Loading...
2014-07-23 MinutesBOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES July 23, 2014 Supervisors in Attendance Mr. James M. Holland, Chairman Mr. Stephen A. Elswick, Vice Chrm. Ms. Dorothy A. Jaeckle Mr. Arthur S. Warren Mr. Daniel A. Gecker Mr. James J. L. Stegmaier County Administrator Staff in Attendance: Mr. Greg Akers, Dir., Internal Audit Mr. Mike Bacile, Dir., Purchasing Dr. Sheryl Bailey, Dep. County Administrator, Management Services Ms. Janice Blakley, Clerk to the Board Ms. Patsy Brown, Dir., Accounting Mr. Allan Carmody, Dir., Budget and Management Ms. Jana Carter, Dir., Juvenile Services Mr. Barry Condrey, Chief Information Officer IST Mr. Roy Covington, Dir., Utilities Ms. Mary Ann Curtin, Dir., Intergovtl. Relations Mr. Will Davis, Dir., Economic Development Mr. William Dupler, Dep. County Administrator, Community Development Colonel Thierry Dupuis, Police Department Ms. Kelly Fried, Asst. Dir., Mental Health Mr. Michael Golden, Dir., Parks and Recreation Mr. John W. Harmon, Real Property Manager Dr. Parham Jaberi, Dir., Health Department Mr. Rob Key, Director, General Services Mr. Mike Mabe, Dir., Library Ms. Mary Martin Selby, Dir., Human Resource Services Mr. Jeffrey L. Mincks, County Attorney Ms. Susan Pollard, Dir., Public Affairs Chief Edward L. Senter, Fire Department Ms. Marsha Sharpe, Dir., Social Services Mr. Scott Smedley, Dir., Environmental Engineering Mr. Jesse Smith, Dir., Transportation 14-498 07/23/14 Ms. Sarah Snead, Dep. County Administrator, Human Services Mr. Kirk Turner, Dir., Planning Mr. Scott Zaremba, Dir., Human Resource Programs Mr. Holland called the regularly scheduled meeting to order at 3:00 p.m. 1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1.A. APRIL 23, 2014 REGULAR MEETING 1.B. JUNE 25, 2014 REGULAR MEETING Ms. Jaeckle indicated she is still unclear regarding information on the residential trash relief item that was discussed in the April minutes' dialogue and Board intentions. In response to Mr. Holland's question, Ms. Jaeckle stated she would approve the minutes, as submitted, but wanted to point out that there was no clarity concerning trash collection relief. Mr. Gecker stated the Board should go ahead with approval of the April minutes. He further stated it was certainly his sense of the evening of April 23rd, that the trash collection item was added back into the County Administrator's budget. He stated he understands the import of the highlighted comment made by Mr. Carmody that it was not in the Administrator's budget that came out with the memo from Administration. He indicated the Board acknowledged that it was not within the Administrator's budget, but as an add-on that was proposed as the Board was going through the process. He indicated he believed the item was included in the motion. He stated if it was a sense of the Board that it was included, then it should be completed in order to move forward. Ms. Jaeckle stated she was surprised the item was not included, especially with all the discussion that took place that evening. On motion of Mr. Warren, seconded by Mr. Gecker, the Board approved the minutes of April 23, 2014, and June 25, 2014, as submitted. Ayes: Holland, Elswick, Jaeckle, Warren and Gecker. Nays: None. Mr. Stegmaier stated he has been presented with a few suggestions by Board members relative to how to proceed with the trash collection relief item. He further stated it is clear that the Board intended to continue the program, at least for those members who are currently enrolled. He stated there have been a number of suggestions to freeze the program at its current level and not allow the program to grow with new members. He further stated he believes the program should continue beyond January. He noted the program is already funded within the budget up until January. He stated staff will come back before the Board to determine if the program should be offered to new members or if members who are currently using the service should be grandfathered. J J 14-499 07/23/14 Ms. Jaeckle stated she is content with leaving the program open for current members. She further stated there were Board concerns relative to going back on promises made to those members who depended on the program. She noted the service is contracted and not maintained by a specific department. In response to Mr. Gecker's question, Mr. Stegmaier stated there is a sense of the Board to expect the service to continue through the fiscal year. Mr. Holland acknowledged the passing of retired Lieutenant Colonel Jesse Mayes. He stated Colonel Mayes was a decorated army veteran and was elected, and served two terms on the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors. He asked the audience to observe a moment of silence in his honor. 2. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS 2.A. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT • Mr. Stegmaier was pleased to report that the county's Utilities Department has been recognized by the National Association of Clean Water Agencies (NACWA) with an Excellence in Management Platinum Recognition. He stated the Excellence in Management Program began in 2003 to recognize the significant achievements of member agencies for distinctive utility management. He further stated in order to receive this honor, member agencies are required to implement and sustain, for a continuous three-year period, successful programs that address the spectrum of unique environmental challenges faced by utilities that provide wastewater treatment services to their communities. • Mr. Stegmaier announced the Center for Digital Government has announced the winners of its annual Digital Counties Survey and Chesterfield County ranked seventh this year. He stated Chesterfield has placed in the top 10 five times. He further stated the competition is a collaborative effort by the Center for Digital Government, Government Technology and the National Association of Counties. He further stated this award validates that we continue to make progress on the Board's priority of operating an accessible and open government that uses technology creatively to engage and serve county residents. He stated this award from the Center for Digital Government honors the entire community. • Mr. Stegmaier was pleased to report that the new two- million gallon Robious water tank was recently hoisted in place. He stated the new tank is anticipated to be in service by November. • Mr. Stegmaier announced The Southern Process Expansion at the Sabra Dipping Company facility in South Chesterfield, Virginia received a Temporary Certificate of Occupancy on Friday, July 11th. He stated in doing so, the Dennis Group was able to deliver the building to Sabra weeks ahead of schedule, far exceeding their expectations. He further stated the contractor commented that this could not have been done without. all of the assistance and diligent efforts of everyone within the Chesterfield County Building Inspections Department. 14-500 07/23/14 • Mr. Stegmaier stated there continues to be revitalization progress in a number of areas in the county. He further stated one example is the demolition of the old Meadowbrook Plaza A&P store which began last week to make way for the new Wal-Mart neighborhood grocery that will built this year. In response to Ms. Jaeckle's question regarding the old Meadowbrook Plaza A&P store, Mr. Dupler stated a couple of the shops were also torn down to make way for the new larger store; however, the rest of the shopping center will be renovated. Ms. Jaeckle noted the Bermuda Square Shopping Center in Chester is also being redeveloped. 3. BOARD MEMBER REPORTS Ms. Jaeckle congratulated Ms. Wendy Hughes for winning the Republican primary election for Circuit Court Clerk. She also commended Tracy Seredni and Justin Smith for running in the campaign as candidates. She expressed concerns relative to neighborhoods feeling the negative impact of bank-owned homes and the decline of property values. Mr. Elswick sadly announced the recent passing of retired Deputy Fire Marshal Francis "Frank" Kinnier, Jr., who lost his battle with cancer. Mr. Gecker announced the re-opening of the Bon Air Library. He expressed appreciation to Mr. Roy Covington and Utilities staff for their hard work relative to the placement of the Robious water tank. Mr. Warren announced the opening of the Bojangles in the Bexley area. He also thanked Mr. Stegmaier for providing information to the Board regarding economic development within the county. Mr. Holland announced that he recently attended the annual National Association of County Officials (NACo) conference held in New Orleans and the award luncheon where Chesterfield County received 15 awards. He stressed the importance of youth summer employment programs within the county. 4. REQUESTS TO POSTPONE AGENDA ITEMS AND ADDITIONS, DELETIONS OR CHANGES IN THE ORDER OF PRESENTATION On motion of Mr. Elswick, seconded by Mr. Warren, the Board replaced Item 8.A.3., Appointments to the Community Services Board; and replaced Item 15.A., Resolution Recognizing Boy Scouts Upon Attaining the Rank of Eagle Scout. Ayes: Holland, Elswick, Jaeckle, Warren and Gecker. Nays: None. 5. RESOLUTIONS There were no Resolutions at this time. J J J 14-501 07/23/14 6. WORK SESSIONS There were no Work Sessions at this time. 7. DEFERRED ITEMS There were no Deferred Items at this time. 8. NEW BUSINESS 8.A. APPOINTMENTS Ms. Blakley stated at the June 25 meeting, the Board nominated members to serve on the Camp Baker Management Board and the Richmond Metropolitan Transportation Authority Board of Directors. She further stated therefore, the Board needs to suspend its rules to nominate and appoint simultaneously only for the Community Services Board. On motion of Mr. Gecker, seconded by Ms. Jaeckle, the Board suspended its rules to nominate and appoint simultaneously for the Community Services Board. Ayes: Holland, Elswick, Jaeckle, Warren and Gecker. Nays: None. 8.A.1. CAMP BAKER MANAGEMENT BOARD On motion of Mr. Gecker, seconded by Mr. Warren, the Board simultaneously reappointed Mr. James Lumpkin and Mr. Robert Mills, to serve on the Camp Baker Management Board, whose terms are effective May 1, 2014, and will expire April 30, 2017. Ayes: Holland, Elswick, Jaeckle, Warren and Gecker. Nays: None. 8.A.2. RICHMOND METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY BOARD OF DIRECTORS On motion of Mr. Warren, seconded by Mr. Elswick, the Board simultaneously reappointed/appointed Mr. Charles R. "Dick" White, Mr. Gregory Whirley, Mr. Bill Woodfin and Mr. James M. Holland, to serve on the Richmond Metropolitan Transportation Authority Board of Directors, whose terms are effective immediately, and will expire June 30, 2018. Ayes: Holland, Elswick, Jaeckle, Warren and Gecker. Nays: None. 8.A.3. COMMUNITY SERVICES BOARD On motion of Mr. Gecker, seconded by Mr. Elswick, the Board simultaneously nominated/appointed Mr. Harvey S. Powers and Mr. Patrick Knightly, to serve as at-large representatives on the Community Services Board, whose terms are effective immediately and will expire December 31, 2016. Ayes: Holland, Elswick, Jaeckle, Warren and Gecker. Nays: None. 14-502 07/23/14 8.B. CONSENT ITEMS 8.B.1. ADOPTION OF RESOLUTIONS 8.B.l.a. RECOGNIZING COUNTY EMPLOYEES UPON THEIR RETIREMENT 8.B.1.a.1. MS. DENISE WESTON, SOCIAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT On motion of Mr. Warren, seconded by Ms. Jaeckle, the Board adopted the following resolution: WHEREAS, Ms. Denise Weston began her service with the Chesterfield-Colonial Heights Department of Social Services on February 27, 1995, as an Eligibility Worker; and WHEREAS, Ms. Weston was promoted to Senior Eligibility Worker in January 2001; and WHEREAS, in January 2009, Ms. Weston was promoted to Eligibility Supervisor; and WHEREAS, Ms. Weston had strong knowledge of the Adult Medicaid program, including Aged, Blind, and Disabled and Long Term Care policy; and WHEREAS, Ms. Weston managed a caseload of Medicaid Long Term Care and Auxiliary Grant cases as Senior Eligibility Worker; and WHEREAS, Ms. Weston represented the department in community events, resource fairs, and seminars for elderly and disabled citizens; and WHEREAS, Ms. Weston assisted in providing Disaster Food Stamps to more than 5,000 citizens following Hurricane Isabelle in 2003; and WHEREAS, Ms. Weston was attentive to the needs of customers and exhibited a level of customer service that served as a model for others; and WHEREAS, Ms. Weston served on agency workgroups and led the Senior Eligibility Worker group; and WHEREAS, Ms. Weston consistently demonstrated flexibility and willingness to meet the needs of her team throughout her tenure in the Department; and WHEREAS, Ms. Weston has demonstrated dedication and commitment to serving the citizens of Chesterfield County and the City of Colonial Heights; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors recognizes the outstanding contributions of Ms. Denise Weston, expresses the appreciation of all residents for her services to the county and the City of Colonial Heights and extends its congratulations upon her retirement, as well as best wishes for a long and happy retirement. Ayes: Holland, Elswick, Jaeckle, Warren and Gecker. Nays: None. J J J 14-503 07/23/14 8.B.i.a.2. MR. MARK ASKIN, PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT On motion of Mr. Warren, seconded by Ms. Jaeckle, the Board adopted the following resolution: WHEREAS, Mr. Mark Arkin will retire from the Chesterfield County Department of Parks and Recreation effective August 1, 2014; and WHEREAS, Mr. Askin began his public service with Chesterfield County in May 1978 as a full-time Groundsman, became Park Foreman in July 1979, and was promoted to Park Coordinator in March 1981; and WHEREAS, Mr. Askin was promoted to Chief of Parks in August 1993, was placed in the position of Acting Assistant Director of Parks in October 2010, and became Assistant Director of Parks in June 2011; and WHEREAS, Mr. Askin has been responsible for the coordination of the Schools Ground Maintenance Program and received a letter of commendation from former County Administrator Lane Ramsey; and WHEREAS, Mr. Askin received a TQI Facilitator Certification; and WHEREAS, Mr. Askin has served the Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission with dedication; and WHEREAS, Mr. Askin has served the Eppington Foundation Board and helped to guide them through operations issues at the Eppington site; and WHEREAS, Mr. Askin has been instrumental in the planning, development and maintenance of Henricus Historical Park and without his generosity in time and attention, Henricus would not be what it is today, including all special events planning and execution be it Publick Days, Parade of Lights at Henricus, or more recently The Bermuda Hundred 150tH for Chesterfield County; and WHEREAS, Mr. Askin has during times of natural disasters and snow events helped to guide the county and its citizens safely through extreme conditions and helped to clear county roadways, driveways and parking areas so that county and school facilities were quickly reopened for public use; and WHEREAS, Mr. Arkin was an instrumental leader in the Parks and Recreation Department ISO 14001 certification for implementation of Environmental Management Systems; and WHEREAS, Mr. Askin has received several commendations for outstanding teamwork; and WHEREAS, Mr. Arkin has been an invaluable asset and mainstay in maintaining Chesterfield County Parks to a high- quality level, especially in the areas of workplace safety management and quality improvement; and WHEREAS, Mr. Arkin has always remained steady, dependable and consistent in providing productive and quality work; and 14-504 07/23/14 WHEREAS, Mr. Askin will be greatly missed by his staff, co-workers, supervisors and the citizens of Chesterfield County whom he served. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors recognizes the outstanding contributions of Mr. Mark Askin, expresses the appreciation of all residents for his 36 years of service to Chesterfield County, and extends appreciation for his dedicated service to the county and congratulations upon his retirement, as well as best wishes for a long and happy retirement. Ayes: Holland, Elswick, Jaeckle, Warren and Gecker. Nays: None. 8.B.1.a.3. MR. N. RAY SADLER, ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT On motion of Mr. Warren, seconded by Ms. Jaeckle, the Board adopted the following resolution: WHEREAS, Mr. N. Ray Sadler joined the Chesterfield County Environmental Engineering Department on March 2, 1987, as a Senior Construction Drainage Inspector; and WHEREAS, in 1997, Mr. Sadler transferred to the Water Quality Division as Water Quality Inspector; and WHEREAS, in 2002, Mr. Sadler's position was promoted to Water Quality Compliance Specialist; and WHEREAS, in 2005, Mr. Sadler transferred to the BMP Division as an Administrative Analyst, and in 2013 carried that position over to the Administrative Division; and WHEREAS, during his tenure as Administrative Analyst in the BMP Division, Mr. Sadler developed and implemented a data system for tracking and administrating operation and maintenance inspections for stormwater management facilities; and WHEREAS, Mr. Sadler was selected as the department's Employee of the Year in 2002; and WHEREAS, Mr. Sadler was focused on providing world-class customer service,~consistently meeting or exceeding customer expectations by assuring customer needs were served in an expeditious, courteous, effective and prompt manner; and WHEREAS, Mr. Sadler served on various committees within the department, including serving as the Quality Council Team leader for a number of years; and WHEREAS, Mr. Sadler's humble character, selfless dedication to Chesterfield County and commitment to the Environmental Engineering Department's customer service are a model for all county employees; and WHEREAS, Mr. Sadler has consistently performed his duties and responsibilities in a professional manner and will be missed by his customers and fellow co-workers. J J J 14-505 07/23/14 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors recognizes the outstanding contributions of Mr. N. Ray Sadler, expresses the appreciation of all residents for his service to Chesterfield County, and extends appreciation for his dedicated service to the county and congratulations upon his retirement, as well as best wishes for a long and happy retirement. Ayes: Holland, Elswick, Jaeckle, Warren and Gecker. Nays: None. 8.B.i.a.4. CAPTAIN RUSSELL A. LESCAULT, POLICE DEPARTMENT On motion of Mr. Warren, seconded by Ms. Jaeckle, the Board adopted the following resolution: WHEREAS, Captain Russell A. Lescault will retire from the Chesterfield County Police Department on July 1, 2014, after providing more than 32 years of quality service to the citizens of Chesterfield County; and WHEREAS, Captain Lescault has faithfully served the county in the capacity of Patrol Officer, Forensic Detective, Sergeant, Lieutenant, and Captain; and WHERAS, Captain Lescault has also served as a Department of Criminal Justice certified instructor, a certified Federal Emergency Management Incident Command instructor, former Central Director of the Virginia Internal Affairs Investigators Association, a member of the Chesterfield County's Veteran's Memorial Committee and the chair of the Police Department's Awards Committee; and WHEREAS, during his career, Captain Lescault has served as Shift Lieutenant, Operations Manager of the Emergency Communications Center, Commander of .the Violent Crimes Unit, Inspector of the Office of Professional Standards and Commander of the Special Operations Division; and WHEREAS, Captain Lescault serves as the Administrative Staff Officer for the Chief of Police, and in this capacity, manages and/or facilitates public ceremonies, including memorial services, award functions, department protocol, honor guard and fund raising events for the Police Foundation, Special Olympics and United Way; and WHEREAS, Captain Lescault was the recipient of a Meritorious Service Award for his service on the Chesterfield County Police Department's Negotiations Team for 15 years, five of which he served as Team Commander; and WHEREAS, Captain Lescault has received many Police Department awards, including Service Award, Specialized Service Ribbon, Operational Service Ribbon, Tactical Service Ribbon, Safe Driving Award, the Police Department's Achievement Award, Professionalism Ribbon, Chief's Commendations, Unit Citations, and the Police Department's Award for Supervisory Excellence; and WHEREAS, Captain Lescault is the Police Department's resident historian and spearheaded a very detailed project on researching and cataloging the department's history; and 14-506 07/23/14 WHEREAS, Captain Lescault is recognized for his communications and human relation skills, his professionalism and his teamwork, all of which he has utilized in serving the citizens of Chesterfield County; and WHEREAS, Captain Lescault has received numerous letters of commendation, thanks and appreciation for service rendered; and WHEREAS, Captain Lescault has provided the Chesterfield County Police Department with many years of loyal and dedicated service; and WHEREAS, Chesterfield County and the Board of Supervisors will miss Captain Lescault's diligent service. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors recognizes Captain Russell A. Lescault, and extends on behalf of its members and the citizens of Chesterfield County, appreciation for his service to the county, congratulations upon his retirement, and best wishes for a long and happy retirement. Ayes: Holland, Elswick, Jaeckle, Warren and Gecker. Nays: None. 8.B.1.a.5. CAREER OFFICER OAKER R. COATS, JR., POLICE DEPARTMENT On motion of Mr. Warren, seconded by Ms. Jaeckle, the Board adopted the following resolution: WHEREAS, Career Officer Oaker R. Coats, Jr. will retire from the Chesterfield County Police Department on August 1, 2014, after providing 25 years of quality service to the citizens of Chesterfield County; and WHEREAS, Career Officer Coats began his law enforcement career in 1986 with the Richmond City Police Department; and WHEREAS, Career Officer Coats has faithfully served the county in the capacity of Patrol Officer, Senior Officer, Master Officer and Career Police Officer; and WHEREAS, during his tenure with the Chesterfield County Police Department, Career Officer Coats has served as a Front Desk Officer, Field Training Officer, and Patrol Rifle Operator; and WHEREAS, Career ,Officer Coats was the recipient of a Richmond Retail Merchants Association Valor Award and a Chief's Commendation for his excellent law enforcement skill in defusing a suicide attempt; and WHEREAS, Career Officer Coats was recognized with the Chief's Commendation for his selfless actions while responding to an apartment fire after twice entering the smoke-filled residence to the sound of the victim yelling for help; however, he was unsuccessful in locating him; then, upon the arrival of fire personnel, he was able to direct them to where he had last heard the victim, who was now unresponsive, and the victim was soon located, received medical treatment and survived; and J J J 14-507 07/23/14 WHEREAS, Career Officer Coats is recognized for his communications and human relations skills, his professionalism and his teamwork, all of which he has utilized within the Police Department and in assisting citizens of Chesterfield County; and WHEREAS, Career Officer Coats has received numerous letters of commendation, thanks and appreciation from the citizens of Chesterfield County for service rendered; and WHEREAS, Career Officer Coats has provided the Chesterfield County Police Department with many years of loyal and dedicated service; and WHEREAS, Chesterfield County and the Board of Supervisors will miss Career Officer Coats' diligent service. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors recognizes Career Officer Oaker R. Coats, Jr., and extends on behalf of its members and the citizens of Chesterfield County, appreciation for his service to the county, congratulations upon his retirement, and best wishes for a long and happy retirement. Ayes: Holland, Elswick, Jaeckle, Warren and Gecker. Nays: None. 8.B.l.b. RECOGNIZING "NATIONAL NIGHT OUT" IN CHESTERFIELD COUNTY On motion of Mr. Warren, seconded by Ms. Jaeckle, the Board adopted the following resolution: WHEREAS, each year in August, communities across the nation band together to demonstrate their unity in the fight against crime; and WHEREAS, this show of solidarity by law-abiding citizens has been named "National Night Out"; and WHEREAS, the National Night Out event will take place on August 5, 2014, as the 31st annual event of this type; and WHEREAS, this year's National Night Out campaign will involve citizens, law enforcement agencies, civic groups, businesses, neighborhood organizations and local officials from 10,000 communities in 50 states, U.S. territories, Canadian cities and military bases worldwide; and WHEREAS, National Night Out is designed to heighten crime- and drug-prevention awareness; and WHEREAS, this event also generates support for, and participation in, local anti-crime programs; and WHEREAS, National Night Out strengthens neighborhood spirit and the relationships between police and the communities; and WHEREAS, these events send a message to criminals that the communities are organized and fighting back against crime; and 14-508 07/23/14 WHEREAS, Chesterfield County has as one of its strategic goals: "Partner with residents to provide a safe and secure community through prevention, readiness, and professional response"; and WHEREAS, National Night Out is an important component in the effort to achieve that goal. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors hereby recognizes "National Night Out" in Chesterfield County, Virginia; thanks police, the more than 100 neighborhoods and businesses and all others who will join to prevent crime; and all residents and businesses in Chesterfield County who will turn on their porch lights and other exterior lights and gather with friends and neighbors on August 5, 2014, to demonstrate their unity in the fight against crime. Ayes: Holland, Elswick, Jaeckle, Warren and Gecker. Nays: None. 8.B.2. SET DATE FOR PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER PLANNING DEPARTMENT FEE ADJUSTMENTS On motion of Mr. Warren, seconded by Ms. Jaeckle, the Board set August 27, 2014, for a public hearing to consider Planning Department fee adjustments. Ayes: Holland, Elswick, Jaeckle, Warren and Gecker. Nays: None. 8.B.3. APPROVAL OF A CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER WITH VIRGINIA CONCRETE FOR PHASE II OF THE JEFFERSON DAVIS STREETSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT On motion of Mr. Warren, seconded by Ms. Jaeckle, the Board approved change order number 2 to the contract with Virginia Concrete for Phase II of the Jefferson Davis Streetscape Improvement Project. Ayes: Holland, Elswick, Jaeckle, Warren and Gecker. Nays: None. 8.B.4. APPROPRIATION OF ROAD CASH PROFFER FUNDS AND AWARD OF A CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT FOR THE SPRING RUN ROAD AT HENSLEY ROAD INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENT PROJECT On motion of Mr. Warren, seconded by Ms. Jaeckle, the Board appropriated an additional $160,000 in road cash proffers from Traffic Shed 12 funds and authorized the award of a $243,777 construction contract to Colony Construction, Inc. for the Spring Run Road at Hensley Road Intersection Improvement Project . Ayes: Holland, Elswick, Jaeckle, Warren and Gecker. Nays: None. J J J 14-509 07/23/14 8.B.5. APPROVAL OF SEWER CONTRACT FOR RIVINGTON PLACE - OFFSITE SANITARY SEWER PROJECT On motion of Mr. Warren, seconded by Ms. Jaeckle, the Board approved a sewer contract for Rivington Place - Offsite Sanitary Sewer, and authorized the County Administrator to execute any necessary documents. Ayes: Holland, Elswick, Jaeckle, Warren and Gecker. Nays: None. 8.B.6. APPROVAL OF WATER AND SEWER CONTRACT FOR THE LANDING at SWIFT CREEK, SECTION 1 On motion of Mr. Warren, seconded by Ms. Jaeckle, the Board approved a water and sewer contract for The Landing at Swift Creek, Section 1, and authorized the County Administrator to execute any necessary documents. Ayes: Holland, Elswick, Jaeckle, Warren and Gecker. Nays: None. 8.B.7. REQUESTS TO QUITCLAIM 8.B.7.a. VARIOUS EASEMENTS ACROSS THE PROPERTY OF 318 CALL FED, L.L.C. On motion of Mr. Warren, seconded by Ms. Jaeckle, the Board authorized the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors and the County Administrator to execute a quitclaim deed to vacate a 20' and variable width SWM/BMP access easement, variable width SWM/BMP easements, 16' drainage easement (private) and 16' variable width water easement across the property of 318 Call Fed, L.L.C. (It is noted a copy of the plat is filed with the papers of this Board.) Ayes: Holland, Elswick, Jaeckle, Warren and Gecker. Nays: None. 8.B.7.b. VARIOUS EASEMENTS ACROSS THE PROPERTY OF TRISHUL OF VA LLC On motion of Mr. Warren, seconded by Ms. Jaeckle, the Board authorized the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors and the County Administrator to execute a quitclaim deed to vacate variable width SWM/BMP and SWM/BMP access easements across the property of Trishul of VA LLC. (It is noted a copy of the plat is filed with the papers of this Board.) Ayes: Holland, Elswick, Jaeckle, Warren and Gecker. Nays: None. 8.B.7.c. A PORTION OF A VARIABLE WIDTH STORM WATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICE ACCESS EASEMENT ACROSS THE PROPERTY OF KINGSLAND TOWNCENTER LLC On motion of Mr. Warren, seconded by Ms. Jaeckle, the Board authorized the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors and the County Administrator to execute a quitclaim deed to vacate a portion of a variable width SWM/BMP access easement across the property of Kingsland Towncenter LLC. (It is noted a copy of the plat is filed with the papers of this Board.) Ayes: Holland, Elswick, Jaeckle, Warren and Gecker. Nays: None. 14-510 07/23/14 8.B.8. ACCEPTANCE OF A PARCEL OF LAND ALONG CENTRALIA ROAD AT KEVKEN DRIVE FROM PEGGY YANCEY BRANCH On motion of Mr. Warren, seconded by Ms. Jaeckle, the Board accepted the conveyance of a parcel of land containing 0.010 acres along Centralia Road at Kevken Drive from Peggy Yancey Branch and authorized the County Administrator to execute the deed. (It is noted a copy of the plat is filed with the papers of this Board.) Ayes: Holland, Elswick, Jaeckle, Warren and Gecker. Nays: None. 8.B.9. REQUESTS FOR PERMISSION 8.B.9.a. FROM MICHAEL F. D'AMATO AND AIMEE E. D'AMATO FOR A PROPOSED FENCE TO ENCROACH WITHIN AN EIGHT-FOOT EASEMENT ACROSS LOT 12, KINGHAM AT THE GROVE, CF.C'TTl1N Fi On motion of Mr. Warren, seconded by Ms. Jaeckle, the Board granted Michael F. D'Amato and Aimee E. D'Amato permission for a proposed fence to encroach within an 8' easement across Lot 12, Kingham at the Grove, Section 6, subject to the execution of a license agreement. (It is noted a copy of the plat is filed with the papers of this Board.) Ayes: Holland, Elswick, Jaeckle, Warren and Gecker. Nays: None. 8.B.9.b. FROM EUGENE R. STURT AND JOHN J. STURT, JR. TO INSTALL A PRIVATE WATER SERVICE WITHIN A PRIVATE EASEMENT TO SERVE PROPERTY ON FERNDALE AVENUE On motion of Mr. Warren, seconded by Ms. Jaeckle, the Board granted Eugene R. Sturt and John J. Sturt, Jr. permission to install a private water service within a private easement and authorized the County Administrator to execute the water connection agreement. (It is noted a copy of the plat is filed with the papers of this Board.) Ayes: Holland, Elswick, Jaeckle, Warren and Gecker. Nays: None. 8.B.10. AWARD OF CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTS 8.B.10.a. FOR THE ELKHARDT GROUND TANK PAINTING AND REHABILITATION PROJECT On motion of Mr. awarded a constru in the amount Administrator to noted a copy of Board . ) Warren, seconded by Ms. Jaeckle, the Board ction contract to Manolis Painting Co., Inc. of $324,517 and authorized the County execute the necessary documents. (It is the plat is filed with the papers of this Ayes: Holland, Elswick, Jaeckle, Warren and Gecker. Nays: None. J J J 14-511 07/23/14 8.B.10.b. FOR THE SHAMROCK DRIVE, CROSSVINE DRIVE AND CENTRALIA ROAD WATERLINE REHABILITATION PROJECT On motion of Mr. Warren, seconded by Ms. Jaeckle, the Board awarded a construction contract to Lyttle Utilities, Inc., in the amount of $673,543 and authorized the County Administrator to execute the necessary documents. Ayes: Holland, Elswick, Jaeckle, Warren and Gecker. Nays: None. 8.B.11. APPROVAL OF AMENDMENT TO LEASE OF PROPERTY FOR THE TEMPORARY HULL STREET POLICE STATION On motion of Mr. Warren, seconded by Ms. Jaeckle, the Board approved a one-year extension to the lease with Woodlake Retail, LLC, for 1500 square feet of office space at 6812 Woodlake Commons Loop for the temporary Hull Street Police Station and authorized the County Administrator to execute the lease amendment in a form approved by the County Attorney. (It is noted a copy of the vicinity sketch is filed with the papers of this Board.) Ayes: Holland, Elswick, Jaeckle, Warren and Gecker. Nays: None. 8.B.12. APPROVAL OF THE PURCHASE OF RIGHTS OF WAY AND EASEMENTS FOR THE JEFFERSON DAVIS HIGHWAY - FALLING CREEK IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT On motion of Mr. Warren, seconded by Ms. Jaeckle, the Board approved the purchase of rights of way and easements for the Jefferson Davis Highway- Falling Creek Improvements Project and authorized the County Administrator to execute the deed. (It is noted a copy of the plat is filed with the papers of this Board.) Ayes: Holland, Elswick, Jaeckle, Warren and Gecker. Nays: None. 8.B.13. ACCEPTANCE OF DEDICATION OF RIGHT OF WAY FOR THE JEFFERSON DAVIS HIGHWAY-FALLING CREEK IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT FROM NEW TESTAMENT CHRISTIAN CHURCHES OF AMERICA, INCORPORATED On motion of Mr. Warren, seconded by Ms. Jaeckle, the Board accepted the dedication of right of way for the Jefferson Davis Highway-Falling Creek Improvements Project from New Testament Christian Churches of America, Incorporated and authorized the County Administrator to execute the deed. (It is noted a copy of the plat is filed with the papers of this Board . ) Ayes: Holland, Elswick, Jaeckle, Warren and Gecker. Nays: None. 14-512 07/23/14 8.B.14. APPROVAL OF RIGHT OF ENTRY FOR THE ROUTE 144 - HARROWGATE ROAD PROJECT, AND AUTHORITY TO ENTER INTO FUTURE RIGHT OF ENTRY AGREEMENTS WITH THE COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION On motion of Mr. Warren, seconded by Ms. Jaeckle, the Board approved a request from the Commonwealth of Virginia, Department of Transportation for right of entry on county owned right of way for the construction of drainage improvements and widening along South Street as part of the Route 144 - Harrowgate Road Project, and authorized the County Administrator to enter into future right of entry agreements with the Department of Transportation, subject to the approval of such agreements by the County Attorney. (It is noted that a copy of the plat is filed with the papers of this Board.) Ayes: Holland, Elswick, Jaeckle, Warren and Gecker. Nays: None. 8.B.15. TRANSFER OF DISTRICT IMPROVEMENT FUNDS FROM THE MATOACA DISTRICT IMPROVEMENT FUND TO THE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT TO PURCHASE AND INSTALL CHAIN LINK FENCING AROUND THE BASKETBALL COURTS IN MATAOCA PARK On motion of Mr. Warren, seconded by Ms. Jaeckle, the Board transferred $6,128 from the Matoaca District Improvement Fund to the Parks and Recreation Department to purchase and install chain link fencing around the basketball courts in Matoaca Park. Ayes: Holland, Elswick, Jaeckle, Warren and Gecker. Nays: None. The following item was removed from the Consent Agenda for Board discussion: 8.B.1.a.6. CORPORAL MICHAEL H. CATRON, POLICE DEPARTMENT Mr. Elswick announced on July 16, The Lord's Baptist Church presented Corporal Michael H. Catron with a community service award for crime prevention. He expressed appreciation for Corporal Catron's exceptional service to the county. On motion of Mr. Elswick, seconded by Mr. Gecker, the Board adopted the following resolution: WHEREAS, Corporal Michael H. Catron will retire from the Chesterfield County Police Department on July 1, 2014, after providing 30 years of quality service to the citizens of Chesterfield County; and WHEREAS, Corporal Catron has faithfully served the county in the capacity of Patrol Officer, Senior, Master, Career Police Officer and Corporal; and WHEREAS, Corporal Catron also served as a Field Training Officer, Crime Prevention Officer, School Resource Officer, Drug Awareness Resistance Education (DARE) Officer, Business Watch Coordinator, Project Lifesaver Coordinator and is a Department of Criminal Justice Services (DCJS) Certified Crime Prevention Specialist; and J J J 14-513 07/23/14 WHEREAS, Corporal Catron was recognized with a Chief's Commendation for exceptional performance in the apprehension of two breaking and entering suspects; and WHEREAS, Corporal Catron and other members of the Crime Prevention Section of the Support Services Unit were the recipients of a Unit Citation for their dedication and outstanding service to the Police Department and the citizens of Chesterfield County; and WHEREAS, Corporal Catron assisted in the pilot program for the School Resource Officer Program for the county; and WHEREAS, Corporal Catron developed the county's Project Lifesaver program to serve victims of Alzheimers, dementia and autism; and WHEREAS, Corporal Catron has served on numerous boards, including the Chesterfield Business Council, the Chesterfield Chamber of Commerce, the Hull Street Business Association, the Southport Business Association, the Central Virginia Crime Clinic, the Central Virginia Crime Prevention Association, the Western Business Alliance, the Retail Merchants Association, the Chesterfield County Triad Committee and the Central Virginia Triad Committee; and WHEREAS, Corporal Catron has also served as President of the Richmond Retail Merchants Security and Loss Prevention Association, Chairman of the Chesterfield Business Council's Public Safety Committee, and Treasurer of the Central Virginia Crime Prevention Association; and WHEREAS, Corporal Catron is a regional leader in crime prevention; and WHEREAS, Corporal Catron is recognized for his communications and human relation skills, his professionalism and his teamwork, all of which he has utilized in serving the citizens of Chesterfield County; and WHEREAS, Corporal Catron has received numerous letters of commendation, thanks and appreciation for service rendered; and WHEREAS, Corporal Catron has provided. the Chesterfield County Police Department with many years of loyal and dedicated service; and WHEREAS, Chesterfield County and the Board of Supervisors will miss Corporal Catron's diligent service. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors recognizes Corporal Michael H. Catron, and extends on behalf of its members and the citizens of Chesterfield County, appreciation for his service to the county, congratulations upon his retirement, and best wishes for a long and happy retirement. Ayes: Holland, Elswick, Jaeckle, Warren and Gecker. Nays: None. 14-514 07/23/14 8.C. ADOPTION OF BOARD INVOCATION/MOMENT OF SILENCE POLICY Mr. Mincks stated since 2003, the Board has heard invocations from clergy pursuant to a staff policy which complied with the requirements of the religion clauses of the First Amendment of the United States Constitution, as interpreted by the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals in the case of Simpson v. Chesterfield County. He further stated earlier this year, the United States Supreme Court issued an opinion in the case of Town of Greece v. Galloway, which clarifies First Amendment law in the area of invocations. He stated under the proposed new policy, Board members would give the invocation themselves, on a rotating basis, with the newly-elected Chairperson giving the invocation at the Board's organizational meeting in January. He further stated each Board member could choose to give an invocation or have a moment of silence, and any Board member could choose not to be placed in the rotation to give the invocation. He noted by law, each Board member would have the freedom to choose the content of his or her own invocation, but the invocation may not be used to proselytize or advance any one faith or belief or to disparage any other faith or belief. On motion of Mr. Gecker, seconded by Ms. Jaeckle, the Board adopted the following policy for invocation/moment of silence at Board of Supervisors' meetings: POLICY FOR THE INVOCATION ~ MOMENT OF SILENCE AT BOARD OF SUPERVISORS' MEETINGS [To be effective January 2015] Annually, at the organizational meeting of the Board of Supervisors, the newly-elected Chairperson of the Board shall offer an invocation or moment of silence at the beginning of the evening session of the Board meeting. After the organizational meeting, the Clerk shall then schedule each of the five Board members to offer an invocation or moment of silence in a regular, rotating fashion at all regularly scheduled Board meetings throughout the remainder of the calendar year. Any Board member may elect not to be placed on the rotational schedule for the year. The Clerk shall promptly notify Board members of the meetings for which they are scheduled to offer an invocation or moment of silence. The invocation is for the purpose of invoking divine guidance for the Board in its conduct of public business within the tradition of the American civil religion and is meant to lend gravity to the Board's meeting, to reflect values which have long been part of our Nation's heritage, and to express a common aspiration for a just and peaceful society. To that end, the invocation should be solemn and respectful in tone and invite Board members to reflect upon shared ideals and common ends before they embark on the sometimes fractious business of governing. The invocation must not be used in any fashion to proselytize or advance any one faith or belief or to disparage any other faith or belief. Additionally, both the invocation and-the moment of silence are to be addressed to the other members of the Board, and not to those who are attending the meeting. 14-515 J J J 07/23/14 If a Board member who is scheduled to give an invocation or moment of silence either does not attend a Board meeting for which he or she is scheduled to give the invocation or moment of silence or chooses not to offer an invocation or moment of silence when scheduled to do so, then the next Board member in the rotation shall offer an invocation or moment of silence at that meeting, but the schedule for the remainder of the year shall not be changed as a result. Ayes: Holland, Elswick, Jaeckle, Warren and Gecker. Nays: None. 9. REPORTS 9.A. REPORT ON DEVELOPER WATER AND SEWER CONTRACTS 9.B. REPORT ON STATUS OF GENERAL FUND BALANCE, RESERVE FOR FUTURE CAPITAL PROJECTS, DISTRICT IMPROVEMENT FUNDS AND LEASE PURCHASES On motion of Ms. Jaeckle, seconded by Mr. Warren, the Board approved the following reports: a Report on Developer water and Sewer Contracts; and a Report on Status of General Fund Balance, Reserve for Future Capital Projects, District Improvement Funds and Lease Purchases. Ayes: Holland, Elswick, Jaeckle, Warren and Gecker. Nays: None. 10. FIFTEEN-MINUTE CITIZEN COMMENT PERIOD ON UNSCHEDULED MATTERS Ms. Addie Black expressed concerns relative to the expiration of travel vouchers associated with Access Chesterfield and the need for a larger senior center. Mr. Holland pledged to Ms. Black that her concerns would be addressed. In response to Board member concerns, Ms. Snead stated she was aware of the issue. She clarified that the vendor is not paid until vouchers are used. 11. CLOSED SESSION PURSUANT TO SECTION 2.2-3711(A)(1), CODE OF VIRGINIA, 1950, AS AMENDED, RELATING TO THE PERFORMANCE OF A SPECIFIC COUNTY EMPLOYEE On motion of Mr. Warren, seconded by Mr. Elswick, the Board went into closed session pursuant to Section 2.2- 3711(A)(1), Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended, relating to the performance of a specific county employee. Ayes: Holland, Elswick, Jaeckle, Warren and Gecker. Nays: None. Reconvening: On motion of Ms. Jaeckle, seconded by Mr. Warren, the Board adopted the following resolution: WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors has this day adjourned into Closed Session in accordance with a formal vote of the Board and in accordance with the provisions of the Virginia Freedom of Information Act; and 14-516 07/23/14 WHEREAS, the Virginia Freedom of Information Act effective July 1, 1989 provided for certification that such Closed Session was conducted in conformity with law. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, the Board of Supervisors does hereby certify that to the best of each member's knowledge, i) only public business matters lawfully exempted from open meeting requirements under the Freedom of Information Act were discussed in Closed Session to which this certification applies, and ii) only such business matter were identified in the Motion by which the Closed Session was convened were heard, discussed or considered by the Board. No member dissents from this certification. Mr. Gecker: Aye. Mr. Warren: Aye. Ms. Jaeckle: Aye. Mr. Elswick: Aye. Mr. Holland: Aye. 12. DINNER On motion of Mr. Warren, seconded by Mr. Gecker, the Board recessed to Room 502 for dinner. Ayes: Holland, Elswick, Jaeckle, Warren and Gecker. Nays: None. Reconvening: 13. INVOCATION Reverend Sylvia S. Meadows, Chester United Methodist Church, gave the invocation. 14. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Eagle Scout Andrew Smith led the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag of the United States of America. 15. RESOLUTIONS 15.A. RECOGNIZING MR. ANDREW JOHN SMITH AND MR. SAMUEL CARLTON LEEPER UPON ATTAINING THE RANK OF EAGLE SCOUT Ms. Pollard introduced Mr. Andrew John Smith and Mr. Samuel Carlton Leeper, who were present to receive their resolution. On motion of Mr. Holland, seconded by Mr. Ekswick, the Board adopted the following resolution: WHEREAS, the Boy Scouts of America was incorporated by Mr. William D. Boyce on February 8, 1910, and was chartered by Congress in 1916; and WHEREAS, the Boy Scouts of America was founded to build character, provide citizenship training and promote physical fitness; and J J 14-517 07/23/14 WHEREAS, after earning at least 21 merit badges in a wide variety of skills including leadership, service and outdoor life, serving in a leadership position in a troop, carrying out a service project beneficial to their community, being active in the troop, demonstrating Scout spirit, and living up to the Scout Oath and Law, Mr. Andrew John Smith, Troop 2860, sponsored by Woodlake United Methodist Church, and Mr. Samuel Carlton Leeper, Troop 876, sponsored by Mount Pisgah United Methodist Church, have accomplished those high standards of commitment and have reached the long-sought goal of Eagle Scout, which is received by only four percent of those individuals entering the Scouting movement; and WHEREAS, growing through their experiences in Scouting, learning the lessons of responsible citizenship, and endeavoring to prepare themselves for a role as leaders in society, Andy and Sam have distinguished themselves as members of a new generation of prepared young citizens of whom we can all be very proud. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors, this 23rd day of July 2014, publicly recognizes Mr. Andrew John Smith and Mr. Samuel Carlton Leeper, extends congratulations on their attainment of Eagle Scout, and acknowledges the good fortune of the county to have such outstanding young men as its citizens. Ayes: Holland, Elswick, Jaeckle, Warren and Gecker. Nays: None. Mr. Warren and Mr. Elswick presented the executed resolutions and patches to Mr. MSmith and Mr. Leeper, accompanied by members of their families, congratulated them on their outstanding achievements, and wished them well in future endeavors. Mr. Smith and Mr. Leeper provided details of their Eagle Scout project and expressed appreciation to their families and others for their support. 15.B. RECOGNIZING DISTRICT CHIEF HOWARD C. CANADA, FIRE AND EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT, UPON HIS RETIREMENT Chief Senter introduced District Chief Howard C. Canada, who was present to receive the resolution. On motion of Mr. Holland, seconded by Mr. Warren, the Board adopted the following resolution: WHEREAS, Mr. Howard C. Canada retired from active service and as district chief with the Midlothian Volunteer Fire Department on December 31, 2013; and WHEREAS, having joined the Midlothian Volunteer Fire Department in 1970, Mr. Canada has served the residents of Chesterfield County for 43 years and has dedicated countless hours to their protection; and WHEREAS, Mr. Canada has held various operational positions within the Midlothian Volunteer Fire .Department, including firefighter and motor pump operator; and 14-518 07/23/14 WHEREAS, Mr. Canada served as a lieutenant from 1975 to 1979, and then as a captain from 1989 to 1992; and WHEREAS, Mr. Canada served as assistant district chief for eleven years during two different terms, from 1992 to 1998, and from 2002 to 2005; and WHEREAS, Mr. Canada served as District Chief for twelve years during two different terms, from 1998 to 2001, and from 2006 to 2013; and WHEREAS, Mr. Canada company for seven years, 1990; and WHEREAS, Mr. Canada Tech Forest Fire Crew, Chesterfield and was dep and North Carolina; and also served as the president of the from 1976 to 1979, and from 1988 to served as a member of the Virginia based on his training received in loyed to fires in Virginia, Georgia, WHEREAS, Mr. Canada responded to numerous fires during his service, including the Lodge Building fire at the Old Buckingham Apartments on May 19, 1995, where he was the initial incident commander; and WHEREAS, Mr. Canada received the Outstanding Young Firefighter Award from the Jaycees in 1977; was named the Midlothian Volunteer Fire Company "Officer of the Year" in 2010, 2012, and 2013; was named the Volunteer Fire Officer of the Year for Fiscal Year 2014 for Chesterfield Fire and EMS; and he received the Outstanding Service Award from the New Hope volunteer Fire Department, in Paulding County, Georgia in 1987; and WHEREAS, Mr. Canada served as the President of the Chesterfield Volunteer Fire Chief's Association from 2009 to 2013, helping to provide guidance and leadership to volunteer members throughout Chesterfield County; and WHEREAS, Mr. Canada has been a leading force in integrating career and volunteer personnel assigned to Fire Station #5, creating a cooperative attitude that has served as a model for other companies to emulate; and WHEREAS, Mr. Canada has displayed leadership and cooperation with the department's executive staff in clarifying and updating the department's response practices by converting volunteer personnel serving at Fire Station #5 to duty crews. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors, this 23rd day of July 2014, publicly recognizes the contributions of Mr. Howard C. Canada, expresses the appreciation of all residents for his service to the county, and extends appreciation for his dedicated service and congratulations upon his retirement. AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that a copy of this resolution be presented to Mr. Canada, and that this resolution be permanently recorded among the papers of this Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County, Virginia. Ayes: Holland, Elswick, Jaeckle, Warren and Gecker. Nays: None. J J J 14-519 07/23/14 Mr. Holland presented the executed resolution to Mr. Canada, commended him on his dedication and service to the county, and wished him a long and enjoyable retirement. Mr. Gecker and Mr. Elswick expressed their gratitude for Mr. Canada's faithful service to the county and wished him well in his retirement. Mr. Stegmaier presented Mr. Canada with an acrylic statue and county watch, congratulated him on his retirement and expressed appreciation for his outstanding service to the county. Mr. Canada, accompanied by members of his family, expressed his appreciation to the Board for the special recognition and their kind words. 16. FIFTEEN-MINUTE CITIZEN COMMENT PERIOD ON UNSCHEDULED MATTERS There were no requests to address the Board at this time. 17. REQUESTS FOR MANUFACTURED HOME PERMITS AND REZONING PLACED ON THE CONSENT AGENDA TO BE HEARD IN THE FOLLOWING ORDER: - WITHDRAWALS/DEFERRALS - CASES WHERE THE APPLICANT ACCEPTS THE RECOMMENDATION AND THERE IS NO OPPOSITION - CASES WHERE THE APPLICANT DOES NOT ACCEPT THE RECOMMENDATION AND OR THERE IS PUBLIC OPPOSITION WILL BE HEARD AT SECTION 19 12SN0227 (AMENDED) In Bermuda Magisterial District, Twin Rivers, LLC requests amendment of conditional use planned development (Case 08SN0111) relative to conceptual plan, uses, development standards, access and reduction of cash proffers and amendment of zoning district map in a Community Business (C-3) District on 67.7 acres located in the southwest corner of Meadowville and North Enon Church Roads. Density will be controlled by zoning conditions or ordinance standards. The Comprehensive Plan suggests the property is appropriate for Community Mixed use. Tax IDs 823-659-3856, 6573 and 9483; and 824-659-2386, 5689 and 8890. Mr. Turner stated Ms. Jaeckle is requesting a 90-day deferral to the October 22, 2014 regularly scheduled meeting. Mr. George Emerson accepted the deferral. Mr. Holland called for public comment. Ms. Sandy Pettengill made an inquiry to Ms. Jaeckle as to why there was another request for deferral. No one else came forward to speak to the deferral. Ms. Jaeckle stated the cash proffer policy is currently being analyzed. She further stated Budget staff was asked to take a look at the average value of multifamily units in the county and determine their long-term effects before the Board heard the case. She noted there is no urgency to progress with the proposed development. Ms. Jaeckle then made a motion, seconded by Mr. Gecker, for the Board to defer Case 12SN0227 until October 22, 2014. Ayes: Holland, Elswick, Jaeckle, Warren and Gecker. Nays: None. 14-520 07/23/14 ia~un~~~ In Matoaca Magisterial District, Landing Development Corporation requests amendment of zoning (Case 05SN0193) relative to density, cash proffers, road improvements and recreational facilities and amendment of zoning district map in a Residential (R-25) District on 59.1 acres located in the southeast corner of Crown Point and Woolridge Roads. Density will be controlled by zoning conditions or ordinance standards. The Comprehensive Plan suggests the property is appropriate for Suburban Residential I use (maximum of 2.0 dwellings per acre). Tax IDs 717-681-3039, 6767 and 8129; 717-682-6832; 718-681-3676; and 718-682-3148. Mr. Turner presented a summary of Case 14SN0573 and stated both the Planning Commission and staff recommended approval and acceptance of the proffered conditions. Mr. Larry Horton, representing the applicant, accepted the recommendation. Mr. Holland called for public comment. Mr. Bob Olsen urged the Board to approve the request. He stated he is pleased that the applicant is paying the full cash proffer amount. There being no one else to speak to the issue, the public hearing was closed. Mr. Elswick made a motion to approve Case 14SN0573. Ms. Jaeckle stated when she reviews the logistics of the case she sees what is wrong with the proffer system. She further stated the capacity of Cosby High School is currently at 116 percent, with no new plans for a new high school in the near future. Mr. Elswick stated the Comprehensive Plan calls for the School Board to look at redistricting and leveling out school populations. He further stated Cosby High School is over capacity, but there are ways to address the issue. Mr. Warren seconded Mr. Elswick's motion. He stated the Board approved keeping the current maximum cash proffer amount. He further stated the mathematical calculation includes cumulative development over a period of time. He stated the applicant has met all the requirements, plus the full cash proffer amount to mitigate the impact on capital facilities and believes the case to be very reasonable. Mr. Holland called for a vote on the motion made by Mr. Elswick, seconded by Mr. Warren, for the Board to approve Case 14SN0573 and accept the following proffered conditions: With the approval of this request, Proffered Condition 12 of Case 05SN0193 would be deleted and Proffered Conditions 4, 11, 15 and 17 of Case 05SN0193 would be amended as outlined below. All other conditions of Case 05SN0193 shall remain in full force and effect. The Applicant amends Proffered Condition 4 of Case 05SN0193 to read as follows: J J J 14-521 07/23/14 1. A maximum of 61 lots shall be permitted. The Applicant amends Proffered Condition 11 of Case 05SN0193 to read as follows: 2. Cash Proffers: A. For each dwelling unit, the applicant, sub- divider, or assignee(s) shall pay the following to the County of Chesterfield, prior to the issuance of a building permit for infrastructure improvements within the service district for the property; provided, however, that the period through June 30, 2017, the applicant sub-divider, or assignee(s) shall pay the following to the County of Chesterfield, immediately after completion of the final inspection but before the certificate of occupancy is issued: i. $18,966.00 per dwelling unit, if paid prior to July 1, 2017; or ii. If paid after June 30, 2017, and before July 1, 2018, $18,966.00 per dwelling unit, adjusted for the four year cumulative change in the Marshall and Swift Building Cost Index between July 1 of the fiscal year in which the case was approved and July 1 four years later. Thereafter, the per dwelling unit cash proffer amount shall be automatically adjusted, annually, by the annual change in the Marshall and Swift Building Cost Index on July 1 of each year. B. In the event the cash payment is not used for which proffered within 15 years of receipt the cash shall be returned in full to the payer. C. Should any impact fees be imposed by Chesterfield County at any time during the life of the development that are applicable to the property, the amount paid in cash proffers shall be in lieu of or credited toward but not to be in addition to any impact fees in a manner determined by the County. D. Cash proffer payments shall be spent for the purposes proffered or as otherwise permitted by law. The Applicant amends Proffered Condition 15 of Case 05SN0193 to read as follows 3. To provide an adequate roadway system, the developer shall provide the following improvements with initial development of the property: a. Construction of additional pavement along Woolridge Road at the approved access to provide left and right turn lanes, if warranted, based on Transportation Department standards. 14-522 07/23/14 b. Dedication to and for the benefit of Chesterfield County, free and unrestricted, of any additional right of way (or easements) required for the improvements identified above. The Applicant amends Proffered Condition 17 of Case 05SN0193 to read as follows 4. Recreational facilities shall be limited to a walking path, picnic area, pavilion and pier which would permit observation and launching of personal watercraft such as canoes, kayaks and paddle boats. A maximum of two (2) storage structures for personal watercraft such as canoes, kayaks and paddle boats shall be permitted. The Applicant offers the following additional proffered condition: 5. Architecture/Design Elements A. Front Walks/Drivewavs: 1. A minimum of a four (4) foot wide hardscaped front walk shall be provided from the driveway to each dwelling unit 2. All portions of driveways and parking areas shall be hardscaped. B. Landscaping and Yards 1. Supplemental Trees: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for each dwelling unit, a minimum of one (1) deciduous tree shall be planted in each front yard. At the time of planting, these supplemental trees shall have a minimum caliper of 2" measured at breast height (4' 10" above ground). 2. Front Yards: Except for the foundation planting bed, all front yards shall be sodded. 3. Front Foundation Planting Beds: Foundation planting is required along the entire front facade of all units, and shall extend along all sides facing a street. Foundation Planting Beds shall be a minimum of 4' wide from the unit foundation. Planting beds shall be defined with a trenched edge or suitable landscape edging material. Planting beds shall include medium shrubs and may also include spreading groundcovers. C. Architecture and Materials 1. Repetition: Dwellings with the same J J J 14-523 07/23/14 elevations may not be located adjacent to, directly across from, or diagonally across from each other on the same street. This requirement does not apply to units on different streets backing up to each other. 2. Exterior Facades: Acceptable siding materials include brick, stone, masonry, stucco, synthetic stucco (E.I.F.S), and approved horizontal lap siding. Horizontal lap siding may be manufactured from natural wood or cement fiber board or may be premium quality vinyl siding. Plywood and metal siding are not permitted. Additional siding requirements: a. Where a dwelling borders more than one street, all street-facing facades shall be finished in the same materials. b. Cementitious and vinyl siding is permitted. Premium quality vinyl is defined as vinyl siding with a minimum wall thickness of .044". c. Synthetic Stucco (E.I.F.S.) siding shall be finished in smooth, sand or level texture. Rough textures are not permitted. D. Roof Material: Roofing material shall be dimensional architectural shingles or better with a minimum 30 year warranty. E. Porches, Stoops and Decks 1. Front Porches: All front entry stoops and front porches shall be constructed with continuous masonry foundation wall or on 12"x12" masonry piers. Extended front porches shall be a minimum of five (5)' deep. Space between piers under porches shall be enclosed with framed lattice panels. Handrails and railings shall be finished painted wood or metal railing with vertical pickets or swan balusters. Pickets shall be supported on top and bottom rails that span between columns. 2. Front Porch Flooring: Porch flooring may be concrete, exposed aggregate concrete, or a finished paving material such as stone, the or brick, finished (stained dark) wood, or properly trimmed composite decking boards. Unfinished treated wood decking is not acceptable. All front steps shall be masonry to match the foundation. 14-524 07/23/14 F. Front Loaded Garages: Front loaded garages shall be located no closer to the street than the front facade of the dwelling unit. 6. A twenty (20) foot buffer, exclusive of easements and required yards, shall be provided adjacent to Crown Point Rd from the western terminus of the thirty (30) foot wide tree preservation strip (Condition 9 of Case 05SN0193) This buffer shall be provided in accordance with Zoning Ordinance requirements and shall be supplemented with plantings as necessary to comply with one (1) times Landscape C. Ayes: Holland, Elswick, Jaeckle, Warren and Gecker. Nays: None. 14SN0578 In Midlothian Magisterial District, St. Ives LC requests amendment of zoning (Case 05SN0329) relative to architectural standards, garage setbacks, cash proffers, timbering, age restriction and road improvements and amendment of zoning district map in a Residential (R-12) District on 26.4 acres fronting the northern terminus of North Otterdale Road, north of Paddle Creek Drive. Density will be controlled by zoning conditions or ordinance standards. The Comprehensive Plan suggests the property is appropriate for Low Density Residential use (maximum of 1.0 dwelling per acre). Tax ID 717-714-5888; 718-713-4861; and 718-714-0248. Mr. Turner presented a summary of Case 14SN0578 and stated both the Planning Commission and staff recommended approval and acceptance of the proffered conditions. Mr. Andy Scherzer, representing the applicant, accepted the recommendation. He respectively requested the Board's approval. Mr. Holland called for public comment. Mr. Marshall Guider, Midlothian District resident, expressed concerns relative to disturbance of property and the bossibility of destrovina surrounding wetlands. Mr. Roy Boyle, representing Brookcreek Crossing, requested clarification regarding construction hours and the current percentage of capacity at Watkins Elementary School. Mr. George Emerson stated the cash proffer system is broken and expressed concerns relative to developers paying cash proffers in areas of the county where schools are not over capacity. He stated the case presents an example of how supply and demand can be leveled out in the county. Mr. Paul Grasewicz urged the Board to approve the request. He stated the proffered conditions adequately address the impact of this development on necessary capital facilities. He noted there is still a sharing of the cost of growth between the taxpayer and the developer; however, new growth should pay for itself. There being no one else to speak to the issue, the public hearing was closed. J J 14-525 07/23/14 Mr. Scherzer stated the issues brought up regarding wetlands will be resolved during the normal process. He further stated every development within the county has to go through various permitting processes and received all the appropriate requisite approvals. He stated the Department of Environmental Engineering and the Army Corps of Engineers will make a decision to determine full compliance. He noted the land is currently zoned for the proposed land use. He stated there are additional safeguards for the adjoining neighborhood and significant road improvements relative to the case. Mr. Gecker noted Proffer 7 states there ar-e limitations on timing of construction activity. In regards to wetland delineations, he stated until resolved, a land disturbance permit to commence the development would not be issued by Environmental Engineering. He further stated the issue would be resolved through the Army Corps of Engineers and Environmental Engineering and does not affect the proposed amendments. In regards to school capacity, he stated there are plans within the current CIP for a reliever school for Watkins Elementary. He stressed the importance of the completion of North Otterdale Road to relieve traffic elsewhere in adjoining neighborhoods and significantly reduce fire response times. He noted the developer is constructing the road on both the proposed land use and county owned property. Mr. Gecker then made a motion, seconded by Ms. Jaeckle, for the Board to approve Case 145N0578 and accept the following proffered conditions: With the approval of this request, Proffered Conditions 10, 11 and 16 of Case 05SN0329 shall be deleted and Proffered Conditions 4, 9, 12, 13, 15 and 17 shall be amended as outlined below. All other conditions of Case 05SN0329 shall remain in force and effect. The Applicant amends Proffered Condition 4 of Case 05SN0329 to read as follows: 1. Foundations: The exposed portion of any foundation shall be brick or stone. Synthetic or natural stucco foundations may be permitted for facades constructed entirely of stucco. Rear walkout basement walls may be sided or cast concrete painted to match house. The Applicant amends Proffered Condition 9 of Case 05SN0329 to read as follows: 2. Front Loaded Garages: Front loaded attached garages shall be permitted to extend as far forward from the front line of the main dwelling as the front line of the front porch provided that the roof lines of the porch and garage are contiguous. Where the rooflines are not contiguous, garages shal l be permitted to project a maximum of two ( 2 ) feet forward of the front line of the main dwelling. The Applicant amends Proffered Condition 12 of Case 055N0329 to read as follows: 14-526 07/23/14 3. Cash Proffer: The applicant, subdivider, or pay the following to the County for infrastructure improvements district for the property: assignee(s) shall of Chesterfield, within the service A. For each dwelling unit, the applicant, sub- divider, or assignee(s) shall pay the following to the County of Chesterfield, prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy for infrastructure improvements within the service district for the property; provided however that for the period through June 30, 2018, the applicant, sub-divider, or assignee(s) shall pay the following to the County of Chesterfield, immediately after completion of the final inspection: i. $11,262.00 per dwelling unit, if paid prior to July 1, 2018. Or, if paid after June 30, 2018, and before July 1, 2019, $11,262.00 per dwelling unit, adjusted for the four year cumulative change in the Marshall and Swift Building Cost Index between July 1 of the fiscal year in which the case was approved and July 1 four years later. Thereafter, the per dwelling unit cash proffer amount shall be automatically adjusted annually, by the annual change in the Marshall and Swift Building Cost Index on July 1 of each year. At time of payment $11,262.00 will be allocated pro-rata among the facility costs as follows: $1,198.00 for parks and recreation, $310.00 for library facilities, $9,073.00 for schools and $681.00 for fire stations; ii. If payment is made after June 30, 2019, the amount approved by the Board of Supervisors not to exceed $11,262.00 per dwelling unit pro-rated as set forth in Proffered Condition 8.A.i. above and adjusted upward by any increase in the Marshall and Swift Building Cost Index between July 1, 20018, and July 1 of the fiscal year in which the payment is made if paid after June 30, 2019. B. Cash proffer payments shall be spent for the purposes proffered or as otherwise permitted by law. C. In the event the cash payment is not used for which proffered within 15 years of receipt the cash shall be returned in full to the payer. D. Should any impact fees be imposed by the County of Chesterfield at any time during the life of the development that are applicable to the property, the amount paid in cash proffers shall be in lieu of or credited toward, but not be in addition to, any impact fees, in a manner determined by the County. (B & M) J J J 14-527 07/23/14 The Applicant amends Proffered Condition 13 of Case 05SN0329 to read as follows: 4. Timbering: Timber management, for the purpose of enhancing the health and viability of the forest, under the supervision of a qualified forester, will only be allowed upon the submission and approval of the appropriate forest management plan to include, but not limited to, erosion control, Chesapeake Bay Act/Wetland Restrictions, and the issuance of a land disturbance permit by the Environmental Engineering Department. Any other timbering shall be incorporated into the site development erosion and sediment control plan/narrative as the initial phase of infrastructure construction and will not commence until the issuance of the actual site development land disturbance permit. (EE) The Applicant amends Proffered Condition 15 of Case 05SN0329 to read as follows: 5. Road Improvements: The following road improvements shall be substantially complete, as determined by the Transportation Department, prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy. State acceptance of these improvements shall be achieved within two years of recordation of the initial section unless determined otherwise by the Director of Environmental Engineering. A. Construction of additional pavement along North Otterdale Road Extended at the approved access to provide right and left turn lanes; B. Construction of two (2) lanes of North Otterdale Road Extended, to VDOT Urban Collector Standards (40 mph) with modifications approved by the Transportation Department, from its current terminus in Rosemont just north of the property to its current terminus in Brookcreek Crossing just south of the property, approximately 850 feet; C. Dedication to Chesterfield County, free and unrestricted, any additional right-of-way or easements, required for these improvements. The Applicant amends Proffered Condition 17 of Case 05SN0329 to read as follows: 6. Architectural/Design Elements. A. Front Walks: 1. A minimum of a four (4) foot wide hardscaped front walk shall be provided to each dwelling unit. B. Landscaping and Yards 1. Supplemental Trees: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for each dwelling unit, a minimum of one 14-528 07/23/14 (1) flowering tree shall be planted in each front yard. At the time of planting, these supplemental trees shall have a minimum caliper of 2" measured at breast height (4' 10" above ground). 2. Front Yards: Except for the foundation planting bed, all front yards shall be sodded. 3. Front Foundation Planting Beds: Foundation planting is required along the entire front facade of all units, and shall extend along all sides facing a street. Foundation Planting Beds shall be a minimum of 4' wide from the unit foundation. Planting beds shall be defined with a trenched edge or suitable landscape edging material. Planting beds shall include medium shrubs and may also include spreading groundcovers. C. Architecture and Materials 1. Repetition: Dwellings with the same elevations may not be located adjacent to, directly across from, or diagonally across from each other on the same street. This requirement does not apply to units on different streets backing up to each other. 2. Exterior Facades: Acceptable siding materials include brick, stone, masonry, stucco, synthetic stucco (E.I.F.S), and approved horizontal lap siding. Horizontal lap siding may be manufactured from natural wood or cement fiber board or may be premium quality vinyl siding. Plywood and metal siding are not permitted. Additional siding requirements: a. Where a dwelling borders more than one street, all street-facing facades shall be finished in the same materials. b. Cementitious and vinyl siding is permitted in traditional wide beaded styles only, unless otherwise approved by the Architectural Board for special design conditions. Premium quality vinyl is defined as vinyl siding with a minimum wall thickness of .044". c. Synthetic Stucco (E.I.F.S.) siding shall be finished in smooth, sand or level texture. Rough textures are not permitted. 14-529 07/23/14 J J J D. Roof Material: Roofing material dimensional architectural shingles with a minimum 30 year warranty. shall be or better E. Porches, Stoops and Decks 1. Front Porches: All front entry stoops and front porches shall be constructed with continuous masonry foundation wall or on 12"x12" masonry piers. Extended front porches shall be a minimum of five (5)' deep. Space between piers under porches shall be enclosed with framed lattice panels. Handrails and railings shall be finished painted wood or metal railing with vertical pickets or swan balusters. Pickets shall be supported on top and bottom rails that span between columns. 2. Front Porch Flooring: Porch flooring may be concrete, exposed aggregate concrete, or a finished paving material such as stone, the or brick, finished (stained dark) wood, or properly trimmed composite decking boards. Unfinished treated wood decking is not acceptable.. All front steps shall be masonry to match the foundation. The Applicant offers the following additional proffered conditions: 7. Limitations on Timing of Construction Activity A. Permitted Hours For Construction: 1. Construction activity shall be limited to between the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m. Monday through Friday; 7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. on Saturday; and 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. on Sunday. For the purpose of this condition, construction activity shall be considered land clearing; grading; installation of infrastructure (such as roads, utilities and storm drainage); and construction of a dwelling on a vacant lot. 2. This condition is not intended to restrict the hours of home construction (such as with additions or alterations) once a dwelling is occupied as a residence. 3. Prior to commencing any construction activity, these restrictions shall be posted in English and Spanish on a 2' X 2' sign that is clearly legible from the public right of way at the entrance into the development. Such sign shall be maintained by the developer and shall 14-530 07/23/14 remain until all construction activity is complete. B. Written Notification Prior To Commencing Construction: Prior to any construction activity, the Developer shall notify all adjacent property owners in writing of the anticipated date construction activity will commence. C. Evidence of Performance: Prior to the issuance of a land disturbance permit, the Developer shall provide written confirmation to the Environmental Engineering Department that the sign posting(s) and written notifications have occurred as required by this condition. (P & EE). 8. Landscape Strip: A ten (10) foot wide landscape strip shall be provided adjacent to Tax IDs: 718- 713-8700, 8807, 9014, 9022, 9031, 9238 and 9446. Plantings shall conform to Exhibit A prepared by Balzer and Associates and dated June 6, 2014, or as otherwise approved by the Chesterfield County Planning Department at the time of building permit review. Evergreen plantings shall have a minimum height of six (6) feet at time of planting. Deciduous trees shall have a minimum height of nine (9) feet at time of planting. All plantings within this landscape strip shall be installed on each individual lot prior to the issuance of final occupancy for a dwelling on such lot. (P) Ayes: Holland, Elswick, Jaeckle, Warren and Gecker. Nays: None. '13SN0125 In Clover Hill Magisterial District, request of Viridis Development Corporation for amendment of zoning (Case 06SN0127) to eliminate cash proffers and increase density and amendment of zoning district map in a Residential (R-12) District on 22.6 acres lying at the northern terminus of Vickilee Road, the western terminus of Marblethorpe Road, the eastern terminus of North Vickilee Road and Vickilee Court. Residential use of up to 3.63 units per acre is permitted in the Residential (R-12) District. The Comprehensive Plan suggests the property is appropriate for Residential use of 2.5 dwellings per acre or less. Tax IDs 746-699-8830; and 747-699-0744, 1248, 1750, 2453, 3040 and 4454. Mr. Robert Clay presented a summary of Case 13SN0125 and stated the Planning Commission recommended approval and acceptance of the proffered conditions. He further stated staff recommends denial. He stated the requested modification to density would increase the maximum density of the development from 2.1 to 2.16 dwelling units per acre, resulting in an additional three lots with sole access through Forest Acres Subdivision. He further stated the amendment continues to maintain compatibility with area J J J 14-531 07/23/14 development. He stated the requested modification would also delete the cash proffer in favor of proffered road improvements to mitigate the impact, and the request falls short of adequately addressing the proposed development's impact o~ school, park, library and fire station facilities. Consequently, he stated the county's ability to provide adequate facilities to its citizens will be adversely impacted. He further stated given these considerations, denial of the request to eliminate the cash proffer and approval of the requested increase in density is recommended. Mr. Brennen Keene, representing the applicant, stated the original zoning case was approved in August 2006 with the cash proffer at the time of $11,225 per dwelling unit with the provision of off-site stormwater improvements, subject to the Marshall and Swift Index escalator. He further stated the cash proffer would have been $15,660 if the stormwater improvements could not have been constructed. He stated the applicant is requesting the deletion of cash proffers and is furthermore offering the development of a northbound right turn lane along Courthouse Road at Cherlynn Road to address its impact on transportation. In addition, he stated the applicant is proffering density of no more than fifty lots, and an average lot size of 14,700 square feet, if sole access is provided through Forest Acres Subdivision. He stated if the development does not create the need to expand capital facilities, then no cash proffer should be anticipated. He further stated no individualized determination has been provided in this case as to parks, libraries, fire/EMS and schools, and evidence has been provided by the applicant that shows that there are, in fact, no impacts on the need to expand those capital facilities. He noted other impacts (transportation) have been addressed. In closing, he stated the applicant is improving other county-owned capital facilities impacts (stormwater facilities) at a cost substantially higher than anticipated in the original zoning request and should be considered as an offset for any perceived impacts. Mr. Holland called for public comment. Ms. Sandy Pettengill expressed concerns relative to the elimination of cash proffers. She stated zoning applicants should be held responsible for paying their fair share of the cost of new or expanding public facilities. She urged the Board to deny the request. Mr. Bob Olsen stated the full removal of cash proffers would require infrastructure costs to be endured by existing county residents. Mr. Freddy Boisseau expressed concerns relative to the elimination of cash proffers.. He stated developers should pay their share of the cost to build new or expanding infrastructure. Mr. John Pettengill urged the Board to deny the request. He stated zoning applicants should be held responsible for paying their fair share of impacts made to public facilities. Mr. Paul Grasewicz stated the proposed case amendments do not satisfactorily mitigate the impacts of the subdivision on county public facilities. He further stated the existing zoning provides a reasonable use of the property with 14-532 07/23/14 conditions proffered by the applicant that do address the impacts of the development on capital facilities. He urged the Board to deny the request. Mr. George Robinson, representing the Woodlake Community Association, stated there have been 10 public hearings since November 2012. He further stated focus should be on county- wide public facility and infrastructure needs rather than the needs within a single area. He stated applicants should pay the full cash proffer amount approved by the Board. Mr. Roy Boyle expressed concerns relative to Case 05SN0329 and the North Otterdale extension. There being no one else to speak to the issue, the public hearing was closed. Mr. Keene stated the applicant is proffering transportation improvements that are in lieu of the transportation cash proffer. He noted the drainage issue is not caused by the development, but by upstream and downstream properties. He stated the development is located in an area of the county that needs revitalization. He noted if the county redistricted schools today, there would no longer be any capacity issues. He stated the proposal would have minimal impact on the area's public facilities. In response to Mr. Warren's question regarding the difference between the case approved in 2006 versus the current case, Mr. Clay stated the requested modification to density would increase the maximum density of the development from 2.1 to 2.16 dwelling units per acre, resulting in three lots with sole access through Forest Acres Subdivision. He further stated the requested modification would also delete the cash proffer in favor of proffered road improvements to mitigate the impact of the development on capital facilities. He stated staff is recommending denial of the request to eliminate the cash proffer. In response to Mr. Warren's question, Mr. Carmody stated when looking at the policy and the parameters that are set out for evaluating individual properties, staff has adhered to the policy. He further stated the proposal by the applicant does fall short of adequately mitigating the impacts on four of the five categories of capital facilities, and therefore, does cause some concern for the health, safety and welfare of county citizens. In response to Mr. Warren's question regarding a letter from the applicant's other attorney, Mr. Mincks stated there is a state statute that was effective July 1 that states if a zoning applicant sends a letter in advance of a zoning case and claims that a condition is unconstitutional if a court finds the condition is unconstitutional then there is a presumption that the unconstitutional condition was the basis of the governing body's decision. He further stated the statute pertains to how a dispute would play out in court, but does not change any of the rules as to the appropriateness of the conditions. He stated the rules pertaining to accepting conditions, proffers or denying cases are the same legal rules that have been in effect. He further stated the standard that was upheld in the previous case, which the county is involved in, that established the same test of nexus and if the Board does not believe the applicant in the case in question is proffering necessary impacts generated by the development, then it is appropriate for the Board to deny the case. J J J 14-533 07/23/14 Ms. Jaeckle stated the Board has spent years discussing revitalization and changes that need to be made relative to the divide within the county. She stated there is an opportunity to provide more homeownership to support specific schools to benefit the west portion of the county. She noted the comments made by Planning Commissioners at the February meeting. She stressed the importance of changing the Cash Proffer Policy to address demographics relative to schools. She noted the development is mitigating stormwater drainage issues that will affect other areas. She stated she believes the case promotes flexibility in the policy as a way of supporting revitalization efforts. Mr. Gecker stated there is a continual shift to the northwest, leaving behind some of the eastern areas. He further stated slowly but surely those issues are being addressed through the School Revitalization Plan and the emphasis through the Comprehensive Plan on revitalization. He stated it is interesting to see the evolution of the way cases get argued from FY2000 to today relative to proffers. He further stated in this case in particular it seems that land use does still matter in an area of the county that may need revitalization. He stated the intent was not to cram every lot into every vacant piece of property, but to be more respectful of the land and allow for developments that enhance existing neighborhoods. He further stated the drainage and erosion issues, as noted in the staff report, are significant and really not benefited by the increased density proposed by the applicant. He stated from his perspective, the case is not a case about proffers, and inquired whether the proposal represents the character of development in 2014 that is needed in the area off Courthouse Road. He further stated the applicant should be willing to proffer higher quality than the surrounding area to enhance the existing neighborhoods. Mr. Holland indicated that the focus should be on county-wide public infrastructure needs rather than the needs within a single area. He stated there seems to be some ambiguity relative to infill and revitalization. He noted the applicant does not mitigate the impacts of the development on school, park, library-and fire station facilities. Ms. Jaeckle stressed the importance of incentivizing community reinvestment and noted aging neighborhoods need to attract younger residents. She stated if improvement to the demographics of area schools are not made, nothing will change. She further stated if quality was incorporated instead of the proffers, since the schools are not overcrowded, that would in the long-term be more beneficial to the county than the actual payment of the proffer. Mr. warren stated the county calculates the impact of each residential development on county facilities such as schools, parks, libraries, fire stations and roads. He further stated the county does this calculation every year to make sure it is as accurate as possible . He stated we use a formula that has been tested and found by the courts to be legally proper. He further stated in order to ensure the health, safety and welfare of county residents, and pursuant to state zoning law, developers must then choose how they will account for the impact of their development on public facilities. He stated the county's annual calculation of the impact of residential development on public facilities accurately assesses impact which meets a "rough proportionality" test according to the County Attorney and the courts. He further stated in other words, what is proffered by an applicant must 14-534 07/23/14 be roughly proportional to the impact of the development on these county facilities. He stated that the applicant does not have to make a cash proffer. He further stated cash proffers are just one of many ways that an applicant accounts for the impact of development. He stated he was told by the County Attorney that back in 1996 the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals approved the county's cash proffer analysis in the case of National Association of Home Builders versus Chesterfield County, using the rough proportionality test, and that the United States Supreme Court reaffirmed the rough proportionality test in the 2013 Koontz decision. He further stated here, the applicant is contending that its development will have no impact on schools, parks, fire stations, or libraries. He stated it reaches that conclusion by focusing only on the closest facilities to the development. He further stated the applicant ignores that each resident has an impact which is cumulative to the impact of every other resident. He stated there is no reason to believe that the residents living in this residential development as opposed to other development will somehow have no impact on capital facilities. He further stated children often attend schools outside of their attendance zones, and attendance zone boundaries fluctuate with the school-aged population. Residents enjoy parks and libraries located outside of their immediate neighborhoods. He stated our firefighters respond to fires and emergency situations throughout the county when necessary. He further stated facilities age and need to be expanded or replaced and additional facilities must be built. He stated here, the applicant's zoning application fails to meet the impact of its development on county schools, parks, libraries and fire stations. He further stated he is also concerned with the development's expected drainage impact on the Forest Acres subdivision. He stated the Environmental Engineering Department states that drainage and flooding problems will occur downstream if density of development on the Viridis site increases, as the applicant is requesting. He further stated he could not just turn a blind eye to this problem. He stated all of these reasons and for some reasons set forth in the staff report and for the reasons mentioned at the public hearing tonight, he moved that the Board deny case 13SN0125." Mr. Elswick seconded Mr. Warren's motion. Mr. Holland then called for a vote on the motion of Mr. Warren, seconded by Mr. Elswick, for the Board to deny Case 13SN0125. Ayes: Holland, Elswick, Warren and Gecker. Nays: None. Abstain: Ms. Jaeckle. Ms. Jaeckle noted her vote to abstain was due to the issue of the developer not addressing quality standards. She expressed, concerns relative to the lack of support for revitalization efforts in certain areas of the county. 14SN0572 In Midlothian Magisterial District, Shayma E. Said requests conditional use to permit a stock farm (keeping of fowl) and amendment of zoning district map in an Agricultural (A) District on 2.3 acres known as 1906 ~tterdale Road. Density will be controlled by zoning conditions or ordinance standards. The Comprehensive Plan suggests the property is appropriate for Suburban Residential I use (maximum of 2.0 dwellings per acre). Tax ID 716-697-3404. J J J 14-535 07/23/14 Ms. Jane Peterson presented a summary of Case 14SN0572 and stated the Planning Commission recommended approval and acceptance of the proffered conditions. She further stated staff recommended denial because while the property is zoned Agricultural and is close to the minimum three-acre requirement for by-right stock farm use, and proffered conditions offer standards intended to mitigate the impact of the keeping the additional fowl on adjacent properties, the proposal to continue keeping the additional hens and ducks may have an adverse impact on existing and anticipated single-family residential development in the area. In response to Mr. Gecker's question, Ms. Peterson stated the property is 2.3 acres in area, close to the 3 acres requirement for by-right stock farm use. Ms. Shayma Said stated she accepts the recommendation and urged the Board to approve the conditional use. She stated because of her religion, her family must rely on the chickens and other fowl that they raise for food and nourishment. She noted the property is well-kept and maintained. Mr. Holland called for public comment. Mr. Steve Jones expressed concerns relative to the increased number of fowl on the applicant's property. He inquired about the number of hooved animals allowed on the property. He urged the Board to deny the request. Mr. Gecker noted hooved animals are not allowed on the property. In response to Mr. Warren's question, Mr. Jones stated he lives on the back side of the applicant's property, three lots down. Mr. Gecker also noted that roosters are prohibited. Ms. Sandy Vanover, an adjacent homeowner, stated the Said family has been an asset to the neighborhood. She further stated the fowl present no odor issues or noise concerns, the coop is unnoticeable and the property is well maintained. She urged the Board to approve the request. Mr. Seth Austin, an adjacent homeowner, urged the Board to support the conditional use. Mr. Paul Little commended the applicant's efforts in removing debris and discarded material left on the property by the former owners. He asked the Board to approve the request. Mr. Freddy Boisseau stated the applicant is not creating a trespass or a nuisance to their neighboring property owners. He urged the Board to approve the conditional use. There being no one else to speak to the issue, the public hearing was closed. Mr. Gecker expressed his appreciation for those who spoke to the case. He stated he does not believe the conditional use will adversely impact anyone. Mr. Gecker then made a motion, seconded by Mr. Elswick, for the Board to approve Case 14SN0572. Discussion ensued relative to livestock allowed on the property: 14-536 07/23/14 Mr. Holland called for a vote on the motion made by Mr. Gecker, seconded by Ms. Elswick, for the Board to approve Case 14SN0572 and accept the following proffered conditions: 1. This conditional use shall be granted to and for Shayma Said, exclusively, and shall not be transferable or run with the land. (P) 2. A maximum of thirty-three (33) chickens and ten (10) ducks may be kept on the property. The keeping of roosters shall be prohibited. (P) 3. All chickens and duck area or pen . The pen or corner side yards located a minimum of rear property lines corner side property (P) :s shall be confined to an enclosed shall not be located in the front of the property. The pen shall be fifty (50) feet from the side and and a minimum of 100 feet from line measured from Gamecock Road. 4. No less than 100 square feet of the existing building, which is identified on Attachment 1 as the existing coop and which contains approximately 412 gross square feet, shall be maintained to serve as the coop. There shall be no additions permitted to this building to accommodate the use. A fenced outside run, no less than 500 square feet and no greater than 700 square feet in area, shall be provided. (P) 5. All areas associated with the keeping of chickens (pens, coups, shelters, etc.) shall be cleaned and made free of waste on a regular basis. In addition, the property owner shall employ a means of eliminating any odor problems and propagation of insects. (P) 6. A single row of evergreen trees shall be planted along the northern and western boundary of the outside run to reduce visibility of the run from Gamecock Road and the adjacent property to the west. Within sixty (60) days of the approval of this request, the applicant shall submit a landscaping plan to the Planning Department for review and approval. The approved landscaping shall be installed within ninety (90) days of the approval of the landscape plan. (P) 7. This Conditional Use shall be granted for a period not to exceed five (5) years from the date of approval. (P) Ayes: Holland, Elswick, Jaeckle, Warren and Gecker. Nays: None. 145N0567 In Bermuda Magisterial District, Rivers Bend Medical Office III LLC requests conditional use planned development to permit exceptions to ordinance requirements relative to signage and amendment of zoning district map in a Neighborhood Business (C-2) District on 1.4 acre known as 300 West Hundred Road. Density will be controlled by zoning conditions or ordinance standards. The Comprehensive Plan suggests the property is appropriate for Neighborhood Office use. Tax ID 812-653-2407. J J 14-537 07/23/14 Mr. Ryan Ramsey presented a summary of Case 14SN0567 and stated the Planning Commission recommended approval and acceptance of the proffered condition. He further stated staff recommended denial because the sign standards of the Zoning Ordinance and conditions of zoning provide sufficient freestanding signage to identify the office park project. He stated approval of the request potentially sets a precedent for other projects to seek similar exceptions, thereby resulting in sign proliferation along the Route 10 Corridor. Ms. Carrie Coyner, representing the applicant, stated a second freestanding identification sign for the Rivers Bend Medical Office Park is proposed. She further stated there is a need for businesses located along high-speed arterial roadways to have visibility of project identification signs. She stated the sign would be limited to fifteen feet in height and seventy-five square feet in area with changeable copy. She noted the sign's high-quality design. She respectfully requested the Board's approval. In response to Mr. Holland's question, Ms. Coyner stated the Rivers Bend Medical Office Park, developed in two phases, is currently identified by a freestanding sign located at the northwest corner of West Hundred Road and Rivers Bend Boulevard. She further stated while the ordinance limits this project to one freestanding identification sign, the applicant is requesting a second freestanding project sign to be located to the east side of the Phase 2 entrance. Mr. Holland called for public comment. Mr. Shawn Iker, property manager for the Rivers Bend Medical Park, urged the Board to approve the request. He stated tenants' main priorities are visibility and signage. There being no one else to speak to the issue, the public hearing was closed. Ms. Jaeckle stated she certainly understands the ordinance and the purpose of sign standards; however, signage is very important to small businesses and meets the intended goal. Ms. Jaeckle then made a motion, seconded by Mr. warren, for the Board to approve Case 14SN0567 and accept the following proffered condition: The Applicant in this case, pursuant to Section 15.2-2298 of the Code of Virginia (1950 as amended) and the Zoning Ordinance of Chesterfield County, for themselves and their successors or assigns, proffer that the property known as Chesterfield County Tax Identification Number 812-653-2407 ("the Property") under consideration will be developed according to the following amended proffers if, and only if, the request submitted herewith is granted with only those conditions agreed to by the Applicant. In the event this request is denied or approved with conditions not agreed to by the owner and Applicant, the proffer shall immediately be null and void and of no further force or effect. Master Plan. The Textual Statement dated June 23, 2014 shall be considered the Master Plan. (P) (STAFF NOTE: All previous conditions of zoning approved in Case 87SN080 shall remain in full force and effect.) Ayes: Holland, Elswick, Jaeckle, Warren and Gecker. Nays: None. 14-538 07/23/14 Mr. Mincks specified that the combined and heard as one publi need to be voted on separately. 14SN0575 following two cases could be c hearing; however, they would In Bermuda Magisterial District, Enon Land Company, LLC requests conditional use planned development to permit exceptions to ordinance requirements relative to signage and amendment of zoning district map in a Community Business (C- 3) District on 4.2 acres known as 241 East Hundred Road. Density will be controlled by zoning conditions or ordinance standards. The Comprehensive Plan suggests the property is appropriate for Neighborhood Business use. Tax ID 815-652- 7510. 14SN0576 In Bermuda Magisterial District, Enon Land Company II LLC requests conditional use planned development to permit exceptions to ordinance requirements relative to signage and amendment of zoning district map in a General Business (C-5) Districts on 2 acres known as 200 East Hundred Road. Density will be controlled by zoning conditions or ordinance standards. The Comprehensive Plan suggests the property is appropriate for Neighborhood Business use. Tax ID 814-652- 8334. Mr. Clay presented summaries of Case 14SN0575 and Case 14SN0576 and stated the Planning Commission recommended approval and acceptance of the proffered condition. He further stated staff recommended denial of both cases because the sign standards of the Zoning Ordinance provide sufficient signage to identify a shopping center project. He stated approval of the request potentially sets a precedent for other projects to seek similar exceptions. Ms. Carrie Coyner, representing the applicant, stated freestanding signs for Rivers Bend South and Rivers Bend South II shopping center are being proposed. She further stated there is a need for businesses located along high- speed arterial roadways to have visibility of project identification signs. She stated the applicant is requesting an exception to limitations of the ordinance to replace the existing freestanding project sign with a new sign that is larger in area. She noted the older sign currently in place will be removed upon approval of the request. Mr. Holland called for public comment relative to both cases. Ms. Fran Morris, office manager of Morris Cardiovascular and Risk Reduction Center, stressed the importance of signage for their patients. Dr. Raj Datta, owner of River's Bend Eye Care, also stressed the importance of signage for her patients. Mr. Shawn Iker, property manager for the Rivers Bend Medical Park, urged the Board to approve the request. He stated tenants' main priorities are visibility and signage. He noted the tenants signed a petition in support of the proposal. There being no one else to speak to the issue, the public hearing was closed. 14-539 J J J 07/23/14 Ms. Jaeckle noted that shop visibility is poor and stressed the importance of signage for small businesses within the shopping center. Ms. Jaeckle then made a motion, seconded by Mr. Warren, for the Board to approve Case 14SN0575 and accept the following proffered condition: The Applicant in this case, pursuant to Section 15.2-2298 of the Code of Virginia (1950 as amended) and the Zoning Ordinance of Chesterfield County, for themselves and their successors or assigns, proffer that the property known as Chesterfield County Tax Identification Number 815-652-7510 ("the Property") under consideration will be developed according to the following amended proffers if, and only if, the request submitted herewith is granted with only those conditions agreed to by the Applicant. In the event this request is denied or approved with conditions not agreed to by the owner and Applicant, the proffer shall immediately be null and void and of no further force or effect. Master Plan. The Textual Statement dated June 23, 2014 shall be considered the Master Plan. (P) Ayes: Holland, Elswick, Jaeckle, Warren and Gecker. Nays: None. On motion of Ms. Jaeckle, seconded by Mr. Warren, the Board approved Case 14SN0576 and accepted the following proffered condition: The Applicant in this case, pursuant to Section 15.2-2298 of the Code of Virginia (1950 as amended) and the Zoning Ordinance of Chesterfield County, for themselves and their successors or assigns, proffer that the property known as Chesterfield County Tax Identification Number 815-652-7510 ("the Property") under consideration will be developed according to the following amended proffers if, and only if, the request submitted herewith is granted with only those conditions agreed to by the Applicant. In the event this request is denied or approved with conditions not agreed to by the owner and Applicant, the proffer shall immediately be null and void and of no further force or effect. Master Plan. The Textual Statement dated June 23, 2014 shall be considered the Master Plan. (P) 18. PUBLIC HEARINGS 18.A. TO CONSIDER AMENDING CHAPTER 10, FIRE PROTECTION, OF THE COUNTY CODE Battalion Chief Keith Chambers stated this date and time has been advertised for the Board to consider amending Chapter 10, Fire Protection, of the County Code. He stated the State Department of Housing and Community Development has recently promulgated changes to the VSFPC which will become effective July 18, 2014. He further stated accordingly, the county needs to update the County Code where it refers to the VSFPC to reflect the changes made by the state. He stated these changes are administrative in nature, including changes to the numbering of code sections or clarification of existing language, or a change in the terminology used, but no substantive changes are being made. 14-540 07/23/14 Mr. Holland called for public comment. Mr. Freddy Boisseau inquired about an observation he made relative to operational permit requirements. There being no one else to speak to the issue, the public hearing was closed. On motion of Mr. Warren, seconded by Mr. Elswick, the Board adopted the following ordinance: AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE CODE OF THE COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD, 1997, AS AMENDED, BY AMENDING AND RE-ENACTING SECTION 10-3 RELATING TO THE FIRE PREVENTION CODE BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County: (1) That Section 10-3 of the Code of the County of Chesterfield, 1997, as amended, is amended and re-enacted to read as follows: Sec. 10-3. Fire prevention code-Amendments, additions and deletions. The Virginia Statewide Fire Prevention Code is hereby amended and changed pursuant to Code of Virginia, § 27-97, in the following respects: Chapter 1. Administration and Enforcement 106.3 Inspections: Delete and substitute 106.3 as follows: The fire official is authorized to conduct such inspections as are deemed necessary to determine the extent of compliance with the provisions of this code and to approve reports of inspection by approved agencies or individuals. All reports of such inspections shall be prepared and submitted in writing for review and approval. Inspection reports shall be certified by a responsible officer of such approved agency or by the responsible individual in accordance with the fire official's written policy. The fire official is authorized to engage such expert opinion as deemed necessary to report upon unusual, detailed or complex technical issues subject to the approval of the governing body. The fire official may require the owner or owner's agent to inspect the owner's property or equipment in accordance with guidelines approved by the fire official. 106.8 Plans Review and Certificate of Occupancy: Add section 106.8 as follows: The fire official shall assist the building official in the review of construction plans for compliance with the fire protection provisions of the Virginia Uniform Statewide Building Code for all structures and/or facilities, except detached one- and two-family dwellings, prior to the issuance of a building permit. Furthermore, the fire official shall assist the building official in performing inspections of new systems and structures prior to the issuance of the certificate of occupancy. 106.9 Fire Hydrants: Add section 106.9 as follows: J J .~ 14-541 07/23/14 During the site and/or construction plans review process for construction or change in use of any building or structure, the fire official shall have the authority to require the installation of fire hydrants as he deems necessary to have water available for fire fighting purposes prior to the use of combustible materials in construction being commenced on any floor above the first or ground floor level. Such hydrants shall be accessible to fire fighting apparatus at the time they are installed and at all times thereafter. The fire official will determine the need for fire hydrants based on the use and size of the structure involved and the availability of water in the area of the property. The number of fire hydrants, their placement and the desired flow shall be determined by regulations established from nationally recognized standards. 106.10 Authority to Take Photographs: Add section 106.10 as follows: The fire official or his duly authorized representative is authorized to make sketches and take photographs to document conditions he observes that he believes are violations of the provisions of this code. Subsequent to a fire, explosion, or other emergency, photographs may be taken as are necessary to adequately depict the conditions of the property for the purpose of investigation. No person shall prevent the fire official from making sketches or taking photographs. 107.2 Operational Permits add Table 107.2 as follows: TABLE 107.2. OPERATIONAL PERMIT REQUIREMENTS '.DESCRIPTION rAerosol products. A !. PERMIT !REQUIRED ;(yes or no) n operational No permit is required to manufacture, store or handle an .aggregate quantity of Level 2 or '.Level 3 aerosol products in '.excess of 500 pounds (227 kg) net weight. Amusement buildings. An No ';operational permit is required 'to operate a special amusement ,building. Aviation facilities. An !No .operational permit is required to use a Group H or Group S .occupancy for aircraft servicing or repair and aircraft fuel- servicing vehicles. Additional permits required by other sections of this code include, but are not limited t work, hazardous mate flammable or combusti finishes. rCarnivals and fairs. ..operational permit is Ito conduct a carnival o, hot rials and ble An No required or fair. 14-542 07/23/14 Cellulose nitrate film. An No operational permit is required to store, handle or use cellulose nitrate film in a Group A occupancy. Combustible dust-producing ,No .operations. An operational '' 'permit is required to operate a grain elevator, flour starch mill, feed mill, or a plant pulverizing aluminum, coal, cocoa, magnesium, spices or sugar, or other operations producing combustible dusts as defined in Chapter 2. Combustible fibers. An No operational permit is required for the storage and handling of combustible fibers in quantities greater than 100 cubic feet (2.8 !. m3) . Exception: An operational permit is not required for agricultural 'storage. Compressed gas. An operational !No .permit is required for the storage, use or handling at .normal temperature and pressure (NTP) of compressed gases in excess of the amounts listed below. ' Exception: Vehicles equipped for ~' and using compressed gas as a fuel for propelling the vehicle. PERMIT AMOUNTS FOR COMPRESSED GASES TYPE OF GAS (AMOUNT (cubic ;feet at NTP) Corrosive ',r~ Flammable (except %~ cryogenic fluids and liquefied petroleum gases) Highly toxic ;~ r._. Inert and simple 'E asphyxiant ~ T_._..._.. - --_._... _. _.---_~._. (Oxidizing .(including oxygen) Pyrophoric ~ ~ _____ --- - --- _ -- -y Toxic ~ For SI: 1 cubic foo m2 Covered and open ma An operational perm required for: J J 14-543 07/23/14 1. The placement of retail fixtures and displays, .concession equipment, displays of highly combustible goods and ', 'similar items in the mall. 2. The display of liquid-fired or gas-fired equipment in the mall. 3. The use of open-flame or flame-producing equipment in the I mall. ~__.._-_ __.__ ___ _____- -----_._ ______ _ ____ __.__ _ _ _ _____r Cryogenic fluids. An operational .No permit is required to produce, store, transport on site, use, ',handle or dispense cryogenic fluids in excess of the amounts .listed below. 'Exception: Operational permits ',are not required for vehicles equipped for and using cryogenic ' fluids as a fuel for propelling the vehicle or for refrigerating .the lading. 'PERMIT AMOUNTS FOR CRYOGENIC FLUIDS TYPE OF CRYOGENIC INSIDE iOUTSIDE FLUID ~ BUILDING ' BUILDING (gallons) ~ (gallons) ~_--__ --_ _ _ .;____ _. ___ _.-__-- _____ T_____ ____ ______ ______ ..a Flammable ;More than 1 !60 Inert I60 1500 Oxidizing 10 '50 (includes oxygen) Physical or Any amount ;Any health hazard not ~ !amount indicated above For SI: 1 gallon = 3.785 L. --- ---- .Cutting and welding. An INo operational permit is required !to conduct cutting or welding ', ',operations within the ..jurisdiction. ,Dry cleaning plants. An No operational permit is required to engage in the business of dry "' cleaning or to change to a more hazardous cleaning solvent used in existing dry cleaning ,equipment. YExhibits and trade shows. An No operational permit is required to operate exhibits and trade shows. Explosives, fireworks, and pyrotechnics. An operational 'permit is required for the manufacture, storage, handling, ', 14-544 07/23/14 sale or use of any quantity explosive, explosive materi, fireworks, pyrotechnic spec effects, or pyrotechnic spe~ effects material within the scope of Chapter 56. a. Explosives and blasting agents b. Fireworks, public or private display c. Pyrotechnic special of materials .Exception: Storage in Group or R-5 occupancies of smoke 'propellant, black powder an• small arms primers for pers~ use, not for resale, and in .accordance with the quantity limitations and conditions forth in Section 5601.1, .exception numbers four and Fire hydrants and operational permit to use or operate or valves intended valves. A: is requi: fire hydra for fire suppression purposes which ; installed on water systems ; accessible to a fire appara .access road that is open to generally used by the public Exception: An operational p. is not required for authori .employees of the water comp. .that supplies the system or fire department to use or operate fire hydrants or va: Flammable and combustible 'liquids. An operational pert is required: 1. To use or operate a pipeline for the transportation within facilities of flammable or combustible liquids. This !~ requirement shall not apply to the offsite transportation in pipelines regulated by the Department of Transportation (DOTn) nor does it apply to piping systems. 2. To store, handle or use Class I liquids in excess of five gallons (19 L) in a building or in excess of ten gallons (37.9 'L) outside of a building, except 'that a permit is not required ,for the following: ..~`_--.------__..--------_----_________._.__------__ __.__ _----__e~___-.-- '2.1. The storage or use of Class ~No 'I liquids in the fuel tank of a motor vehicle, aircraft, j J J 14-545 07/23/14 motorboat, mobile power plant or mobile heating plant, unless .such storage, in the opinion of the fire official, would cause an unsafe condition. 2.2. The storage or use of ' '.paints, oils, varnishes or similar flammable mixtures when such liquids are stored for maintenance, painting or similar .purposes for a period of not more than 30 days. 3. To store, handle or use Class ,'~ II or Class IIIA liquids in excess of 25 gallons (95 L) in a building or in excess of 60 gallons (227 L) outside a building, except for fuel oil used in connection with oil- ',burning equipment. 4. To remove Class I or Class II liquids from an underground .storage tank used for fueling motor vehicles by any means .other than the approved, '.stationary on-site pumps !, normally used for dispensing ', 'purposes. ', 5. To operate tank vehicles, ,equipment, tanks, plants, ',terminals, wells, fuel- ' '.dispensing stations, refineries, distilleries and similar ' .facilities where flammable and combustible liquids are produced, processed, transported, stored, dispensed ', or used. 6. To remove, abandon, place ,temporarily out of service (for more than 90 days) or otherwise 'dispose of an underground, 'protected above-ground or above- ':ground flammable or combustible liquid tank. 7. To change the type of contents stored in a flammable or combustible liquid tank to a 'material which poses a greater hazard than that for which the tank was designed and constructed. ' 8. To manufacture, process, ', blend or refine flammable or combustible liquids. ' Floor finishing. An operational 'No permit is required for floor finishing or surfacing operations exceeding 350 square .feet (33 m2) using Class I or Class II liquids. r ---..____ _.._ _.. .._.__--. 'Fruit and crop ripening. An No 14-546 07/23/14 operational permit is required to operate a fruit-ripening, or crop-ripening facility or conduct a fruit-ripening process using ethylene gas. Fumigation, thermal, and ?No .insecticidal fogging. An operational permit is required to operate a business of fumigation, thermal, or insecticidal fogging and to ~! maintain a room, vault or chamber in which a toxic or flammable fumigant is used. ', Hazardous materials. An 'No operational permit is requ' to store, transport on sit dispense, use or handle hazardous materials in exc the amounts listed below. PERMIT AMOUNTS FOR HAZA~ MATERIALS TYPE OF MATERIAL AMOUNT Combustible ;See flat liquids ;and ', combust: liquids Corrosive .materials Gases See comb jgases Liquids X55 gal lc Solids 1,000 p< _ -_._.._ _ _ __ ___ _ r , ______ __._ 'Explosive ; See exp: materials Flammable .materials Gases +See comb ',gases Liquids See flan 'and !combustible ~~;liquids Solids '100 pounds Highly toxic materials i -- ._-- ---_-. _ r___. _. __.__ _.__. _ ,__ ___ _ __. ___. . __ _..-- Gases See compressed ~ ases ' ig j I --. --_.~ 07/23/14 J J J Liquids Class 4 Any amount ' Class 3 1 gallons Class 2 r__.--- _ __ _ - - _ _ _.. __ X10 gallons Class 1 ,55 gallons Solids _ _ _ __ -- __. _____ Class 4 ~ -.. _ _ . __ _. _ _ ___ _. __ __ __a iAny amount Class 3 ----- j 10 poundsb r Class 2 X100 pounds Class 1 X500 pounds Organic peroxides --.._. ___ .. __ . _ ~ .___ __.____. __.._.. __. _-.. _.. _. ..____. ... .... __ _.._ _-- _.._..__ __ r Liquids Class I .Any amount __ __ ___ _ __ _r __ __ _._ ___ _ _ __ _ _ _____ Class II An amount __Y Class III '1 gallon Class IV !2 gallons Class V No permit required Solids Class I ;Any amount , ' Class II Any amount ________ _.. ___ __-.--- Class III _ __ ___ ____ T__.. j10 pounds Class IV X20 pounds ' ~ i _. _ _.._-- _ Class V __..____ ____ _ _ _ _ ____ . r___.___ __________ _. ~_. No permit ' !required fPyrophoric .materials Gases !..See compressed ', ',gases Liquids ;Any amount Solids !Any amount Toxic materials ' Gases ;See compressed ', ;gases Liquids X10 gallons Solids ;100 pounds Unstable (reactive) materials Liquids _. _--- - _-- _ ___ _ , _ _ _ _ ___ _ r---- - ----- - _ Class 4 'Any amount Class 3 !Any amount Class 2 ~5 gallons Class 1 I,10 gallons ___-- _ _ _ Solids Class 4 'Any amount 14-548 07/23/14 ~- Class 3 Any amount Class 2 ;50 pounds J Class 3 Class 2 .Any amount ' j50 pounds ~~ _.__ T_____.-- -___ _ - -- ~ -- Class 1 ;500 pounds ----,- For SI: 1 gallon = 3.785 L, 1 pound = 0.454 kg. a. Twenty gallons when Table 5003.1.1(1) Note k applies and hazard identification signs in ' accordance with Section 5003.5 are provided for quantities of 20 gallons or less. b. Twenty pounds when Table 5003.1.1(1) Note k applies and .hazard identification signs in accordance with Section 5003.5 .are provided for quantities of 200 pounds or less. HPM facilities. An operational permit is required to store, handle or use hazardous production materials. High piled storage. An .operational permit is required to use a building or portion thereof as a high-piled storage .area exceeding 500 square feet (46 m2) . Hot work operations. An operational permit is required for hot work including, but not limited to: 1. Public exhibitions and demonstrations where hot work is conducted. 2. Use of portable hot work equipment inside a structure. '.Exception: Work that is conducted under a construction permit. 3. Fixed-site hot work equipment such as welding booths. '4. Hot work conducted within a hazardous fire area. 5. Application of roof coverings .with the use of an open-flame device. J J 14-549 07/23/14 ~6. When approved, the fire ..official shall issue a permit to carry out a Hot Work Program. This program allows approved 'personnel to regulate their 'facility's hot work operations. The approved personnel shall be trained in the fire safety ', ;aspects denoted in this chapter and shall be responsible for ..issuing permits requiring compliance with the requirements found in this chapter. These .permits shall be issued only to 'their employees or hot work ', operations under their supervision. ', Industrial ovens. An operational 'No permit is required for operation 'of industrial ovens regulated by ' ', Chapter 30. Lumber yards and woodworking ;No plants. An operational permit is required for the storage or processing of lumber exceeding 100,000 board feet (8,333 ft3) (236 m3) . YLiquid-fueled or gas-fueled No vehicles or equipment in assembly buildings. An operational permit is required to display, operate or .demonstrate liquid-fueled or gas-fueled vehicles or equipment in assembly buildings. LP-gas. An operational permit is No required for: 1. Storage and use of LP-gas. ;Exception: An operational permit is not required for individual !containers with a 500-gallon (1893 L) water capacity or less or multiple container systems having an aggregate quantity not ', .exceeding 500 gallons (1893 L), ', .serving occupancies in Group R- 3. ~ '2. Operation of cargo tankers that transport LP-gas. Magnesium. An operational permit 'No is required to melt, cast, heat ..treat or grind more than 10 ;pounds (4.54 kg) of magnesium. Miscellaneous combustible 'No ' ' storage. An operational permit is required to store in any building or upon any premises in excess of 2,500 cubic feet (71 m3) gross volume of combustible ...,empty packing cases, boxes, j 14-550 07/23/14 barrels or similar containers, rubber tires, rubber, cork or similar combustible material. r._ .__.__.~..____v._-____--__._--.---._.____....__.__. _.___._..-___._____~_..w--- Open burning. An operational '.permit is required for the kindling or maintaining of an open fire or a fire on any public street, alley, road, or other public or private ground. Instructions and stipulations of ;the permit shall be adhered to. a. Land clearing and/or property maintenance (90 day permit) b. Tree trimmings and garden trimmings on private property (30 day permit) 'Exception: Recreational fires '.and provided further that the County Administrator may .administratively suspend the .open burning fee for a temporary period of time after any national, state or local '.authority declares a disaster .affecting all or a portion of the County. Yes Open flames and candles. An No .operational permit is required to use open flames or candles in .connection with assembly areas, dining areas of restaurants or drinking establishments. ~ Open flames and torches. An No operational permit is required to remove paint with a torch; or to use a torch or open-flame device in a wildfire risk area. Organic coatings. An operational No permit is required for any organic-coating manufacturing operation producing more than one gallon (4 L) of an organic coating in one day. Places of Assembly. An operational permit is required to operate a place of assembly. Private fire hydrants. An operational permit is required for the removal from service, .use or operation of private fire hydrants. 'Exception: An operational permit is not required for private industry with trained maintenance personnel, private ,fire brigade or fire departments to maintain, test and use .private hydrants. No 1 $400 $0 J J J 14-551 07/23/14 r---- Pyrotechnic special effects ',Yes II$0 material. An operational permit is required for use and handling '~ of pyrotechnic special effects material. Pyroxylin plastics. An No operational permit is required ', for storage or handling of more 'than 25 pounds (11 kg) of cellulose nitrate (pyroxylin) 'plastics and for the assembly or manufacture of articles involving pyroxylin plastics. _._ ......_ ..__._-__... _... _.__... _.._.... __... ..._.___... .. w _.. ~. ..__... __ ...__.. .,... _ _._..____.__..._..._._.__ ___. _. r_._._._ __. Refrigeration equipment. An ;No operational permit is required 'to operate a mechanical refrigeration unit or system ,regulated by Chapter 6. ,Repair garages and service ,No .stations. An operational permit ' is required for operation of repair garages and automotive, marine and fleet service stations. Rooftop heliports. An ,No 'operational permit is required for the operation of a rooftop heliport. Spraying or dipping. An INo operational permit is required to conduct a spraying or dipping operation utilizing flammable or I ' .:combustible liquids or the application of combustible powders regulated by Chapter 24. Storage of scrap tires and tine !No .byproducts. An operational 'permit is required to establish, conduct or maintain storage of scrap tires and tire byproducts 'that exceeds 2,500 cubic feet (71m3) of total volume of scrap tires and for indoor storage of tires and tire byproducts. Temporary membrane structures, No ~ : .tents and canopies. An operational permit is required to operate an air-supported temporary membrane structure or a tent. Exceptions: 1. Tents used exclusively for recreational camping purposes. ' 2. Tents and air-supported structures that cover an area of .900 square feet (84 m2) or less, .including all connecting areas or spaces with a common means of egress or entrance and with an 14-552 07/23/14 occupant load of 50 or less persons. 3. Fabric canopies and awnings open on all sides which comply ',..with all of the following: '3.1. Individual canopies shall have a maximum size of 700 square feet (65 m2). 3.2. The aggregate area of multiple canopies placed side by side without a firebreak clearance of 12 feet (3658 mm) shall not exceed 700 square feet (65 m2) total. 3.3. A minimum clearance of 12 feet (3658 mm) to structures and other tents shall be provided. Tire-rebuilding plants. An ..operational permit is required for the operation and ',maintenance of a tire-rebuilding ,plant. Waste handling. An operational permit is required for the operation of wrecking yards, junk yards and waste material- handling facilities. Wood products. An operational permit is required to store chips, hogged material, lumber or plywood in excess of 200 cubic feet ( 6 m3) . 111.3 Failure to Correct Violations: Delete and substitute 111.3 as follows: If the notice of violation is not complied with within the time specified by the fire official, the fire official may issue a summons for the violation of -the code. The fire official may also request the county attorney to institute the appropriate legal proceedings to restrain, correct or abate such violation or to require removal or termination of the unlawful use of the building or structure in violation of the provisions of this code or of any order or direction made pursuant to the code. 111.4 Penalties: Delete and substitute section 10-6 of the Chesterfield County Code. Chapter 2. Definitions 202.0. General Definitions. Add the following definition: The term "occupant" means any person physically located or situated in or on any property, structure or vehicle irrespective of the length of time or the reason for such occupancy. Chapter 3. General Precautions Against Fire 307.1 Title and Purpose. Delete and substitute section 307.1 as follows: J J J 14-553 07/23/14 This article shall be known as the Chesterfield County Ordinance for the Regulation of Open Burning. The purpose of this article is to protect public health, safety, and welfare by regulating open burning within Chesterfield County to achieve and maintain, to the greatest extent practicable, a level of air quality that will provide comfort and convenience while promoting economic and social development. This article is intended to supplement the applicable regulations promulgated by the State Air Pollution Control Board and other applicable regulations and laws. 307.1.1 Definitions. Delete and substitute section 307.1.1 as follows: For the purpose of this article and subsequent amendments or any orders issued by Chesterfield County, the words or phrases shall have the meaning given them in this section. A. "Automobile graveyard" means any lot or place which is exposed to the weather and upon which more than five motor vehicles of any kind, incapable of being operated, and which it would not be economically practical to make operative, are placed, located or found. B. "Bonfire" means an outdoor fire utilized for ceremonial purposes. C. "Clean burning waste" means waste which does not produce dense smoke when burned and is not prohibited to be burned under this ordinance. D. "Construction waste" means solid waste which is produced or generated during construction of structures. Construction waste consists of lumber, wire, sheetrock, broken brick, shingles, glass, pipes, concrete, and metal and plastics if the metal or plastics are a part of the materials of construction or empty containers for such materials. Paints, coatings, solvents, asbestos, any liquid, compressed gases or semi-liquids, and garbage are not construction wastes and the disposal of such materials must be in accordance with the regulations of the Virginia Waste Management Board. E. "Debris waste" means stumps, wood, and brush from property maintenance and/or land clearing operations. F. "Demolition waste" means that solid waste which is produced by the destruction of structures and their foundations and includes the same materials as construction waste. G. "Garbage" means rotting animal and vegetable matter accumulated by a household in the course of ordinary day to day living. H. "Hazardous waste" means refuse or combinations of refuse which, because of its quantity, concentration or physical, chemical or infectious characteristics may: 1. Cause or significantly contribute to an increase in mortality or an increase in serious irreversible or incapacitating illness; or 2. Pose a substantial present or potential hazard to human health or the environment when improperly treated, stored, transported, disposed, or otherwise managed. I. "Household refuse" means waste material and trash normally accumulated by a household in the course of ordinary day to day living. 14-554 07/23/14 J. "Industrial waste" means all waste generated on the premises of manufacturing and industrial operations such as, but not limited to, those carried on in factories, processing plants, refineries, slaughterhouses, and steel mills. K. "Junkyard" means an establishment or place of business which is maintained, operated,, or used for storing, keeping, buying, or selling junk, or for the maintenance or operation of an automobile graveyard, and the term shall include garbage dumps and sanitary landfills. L. "Landfill" means a sanitary landfill, an industrial waste landfill, or a construction/demolition/debris landfill. See solid waste management regulations for further definitions of these terms. M. "Local landfill" means any landfill located within the jurisdiction of a local government. N. "Occupied building" means any structure occupied or intended for supporting or sheltering any occupancy. O. "Open burning" means the burning of any matter in such a manner that the products resulting from combustion are emitted directly into the atmosphere without passing through a stack, duct or chimney. P. "Open pit incinerator" means a device used to burn waste for the primary purpose of reducing the volume by removing combustible matter. Such devices function by directing a curtain of air at an angle across the top of a trench or similarly enclosed space, thus reducing the amount of combustion by-products emitted into the atmosphere. The term also includes trench burners, air curtain destructors and overdraft incinerators. Q. "Refuse" means trash, rubbish, garbage and other forms of solid or liquid waste, including, but not limited to, wastes resulting from residential, agricultural, commercial, industrial, institutional, trade, construction, land clearing, forest management and emergency operations. R. "Salvage operation" means any operation consisting of a business, trade or industry participating in salvaging or reclaiming any product or material, such as, but not limited to, reprocessing of used motor oils, metals, chemicals, shipping containers or drums, and specifically including automobile graveyards and junkyards. S. "Sanitary landfill" means an engineered land burial facility for the disposal of household waste which is so located, designed, constructed, and operated to contain and isolate the waste so that it does not pose a substantial present or potential hazard to human health or the environment. A sanitary landfill also may receive other types of solid wastes, such as commercial solid waste, nonhazardous sludge, hazardous waste from conditionally exempt small quantity generators, and nonhazardous industrial solid waste. See solid waste management regulations for further definitions of these terms. T. "Smoke" means small gas-borne particulate matter consisting mostly, but not exclusively, of carbon, ash and other material in concentrations sufficient to form a visible plume. J J J 14-555 07/23/14 U. "Special incineration device" means a pit incinerator, conical or tepee burner, or any other device specifically designed to provide good combustion performance. 307.2 Open Burning Regulations-General. Delete and substitute Section 307.2 as follows: A. No owner or other person shall cause or permit open burning or the use of a special incineration device for disposal of refuse except as provided in this ordinance. B. No owner or other person shall cause or permit open burning or the use of a special incineration device for disposal of household refuse or garbage. C. No owner or other person shall cause or permit open burning or the use of a special incineration device for disposal of rubber tires, asphaltic materials, crankcase oil, impregnated wood or other rubber or petroleum based materials except when conducting bona fide fire fighting instruction at fire fighting training schools having permanent facilities. D. No owner or other person shall cause or permit open burning or the use of a special incineration device for disposal of hazardous waste or containers for such materials. E. No owner or other person shall cause or permit open burning or the use of a special incineration device for the purpose of a salvage operation or for the disposal of commercial/industrial waste. F. Open burning or the use of special incineration devices permitted under the provisions of this ordinance does not exempt or excuse any owner or other person from the consequences, liability, damages or injuries which may result from such conduct; nor does it excuse or exempt any owner or other person from complying with other applicable laws, ordinances, regulations and orders of the governmental entities having jurisdiction, even though the open burning is conducted in compliance with this ordinance. In this regard special attention should be directed to Code of Virginia, § 10.1-1142, of the Forest Fire Law of Virginia, the regulations of the Virginia Waste Management Board, and the State Air Pollution Control Board's Regulations for the Control and Abatement of Air Pollution. G. Permitted fires shall be constantly attended by a competent person until they are extinguished. The attendee shall have fire extinguishing equipment readily available for use as deemed necessary by the fire official. H. Upon declaration of an alert, warning or emergency stage of an air pollution episode as described in part VII of the Regulations for the Control and Abatement of Air Pollution or when deemed advisable by the state air pollution control board to prevent a hazard to, or an unreasonable burden upon, public health or welfare, no owner or other person shall cause or permit open burning or use of a special incineration device, and any in process burning or use of special incineration devices shall be immediately terminated in the designated air quality control region. I. The fire marshal or his designee may prohibit all open burning with the exception of those exemptions listed in 307.2.1, when he determines that atmospheric conditions or 14-556 07/23/14 local circumstances make such fires hazardous. Previously issued permits may be extended for the amount of time such prohibition remains in effect. 307.2.1 Exemptions. Delete and substitute subsection 307.2.1 as follows: The following activities are exempted from the above prohibitions to the extent covered by the State Air Pollution Control Board's Regulations for the Control and Abatement of Air Pollution: A. Open burning for training and instruction of government and public fire fighters under the supervision of the designated official and industrial in-house fire fighting personnel; B. Open burning for camp fires or other fires that are used solely for recreational purposes, for ceremonial occasions, for outdoor noncommercial preparation of food, and for warming of outdoor workers; C. Open burning for the destruction of any combustible liquid or gaseous material by burning in a flare or flare stack; D. Open burning for forest management and agriculture practices approved by the state air pollution control board; and E. Open burning for the destruction of classified military documents. F. Open burning for the disposal of evidence under the direction of the Virginia State Police, Chesterfield County Police or the Fire Marshal. 307.2.2 Permissible Open Burning. Add subsection 307.2.2 as follows: A. Open burning is permitted for the disposal of tree trimmings and garden trimmings located on the premises of private property, provided that the following conditions are met: 1. A written permit, valid for 30 days, must be obtained from the Chesterfield Fire & EMS, Fire and Life Safety Division. Application for permit shall include: completed information form, the name, address and telephone number of the occupant and, if different, owner of the property on which the burn is conducted and of any other entity conducting or responsible for the burn. Application shall be submitted to the Fire and Life Safety Division at least 15 days before the desired burn; 2. A copy of the burn permit shall be maintained at the site of the burn, shall be available for review at all times during the burn, shall be displayed so as to be visible from a public roadway and shall be maintained in a manner that protects it from deterioration by weather; 3. The burning shall take place on the premises of the private property from which the trimmings were taken; and all reasonable effort shall be made to minimize the amount of material burned, with the number and size of the piles approved by Chesterfield County Fire & EMS, Fire and Life Safety Division; 4. The location of the burning shall be a minimum of 300 feet from any occupied building unless the occupants 14-557 07/23/14 J J J have given prior written permission, other than buildings located on the property on which the burning is conducted. If the Chesterfield County Fire & EMS, Fire and Life Safety Division determines that it is necessary to protect public health and welfare, it may direct that the above cited distances be increased; 5. All fires must be at least 50 feet from any structure; 6. No regularly scheduled public or private collection service for such trimmings is available at the adjacent street or public road; and 7. Permits for burning tree trimmings and/or garden trimmings shall be limited to two per site per year. B. Open burning is permitted for disposal of debris waste resulting from property maintenance, from the development or modification of roads and highways, parking areas, railroad tracks, pipelines, power and communication lines, buildings or building areas, sanitary landfills, or from any other designated local clearing operations which may be approved by Chesterfield Fire & EMS, Fire and Life Safety Division, provided the following conditions are met: 1. A written permit, valid for 90 days, must be obtained from the Chesterfield Fire & EMS, Fire and Life Safety Division. Application for permit shall include: Fee for permit, completed information form, site plan drawing of burn site, proof of liability insurance for party performing burn, and the name, address and telephone number of the owner and, if different, developer of the property on which the burn is conducted and of any other entity conducting or responsible for the burn. Application shall be submitted to the Fire and Life Safety Division at least 15 days before the desired burn; 2. A copy of the burn permit shall be maintained at the site of the burn, shall be available for review at all times during the burn, shall be displayed so as to be visible from a public roadway and shall be maintained in a manner that protects it from deterioration by weather; 3. The burning shall take place on the site from which the debris waste was generated. All reasonable effort shall be made to minimize the amount of material burned, with the number and size of the debris piles approved by Chesterfield County Fire & EMS, Fire and Life Safety Division; 4. The material to be burned shall consist of brush, stumps and similar debris waste and shall not include demolition material; 5. The location of the burning shall be a minimum of 500 feet from any occupied building unless the occupants have given prior written permission, other than buildings located on the property on which the burning is conducted. If the Chesterfield County Fire & EMS, Fire and Life Safety Division determines that it is necessary to protect public health and welfare, it may direct that the above cited distances be increased; 6. The burning shall be conducted at the greatest distance practicable from highways and airfields; 14-558 07/23/14 7. The burning shall not be allowed to smolder beyond the minimum period of time necessary for the destruction of the materials; 8. The burning shall be conducted only when the prevailing winds are away from any city, town or built-up area; and 9. The permit holder must maintain liability insurance in the minimum amount of $1,000,000.00 general liability coverage at all times while burning is taking place. At the time of permit application, a certificate of insurance coverage shall be submitted to the fire marshal. C. Open burning is permitted for disposal of debris on the site of local landfills provided that the burning does not take place on land that has been filled and covered so as to present an underground fire hazard due to the presence of methane gas, provided that the following conditions are met: 1. A written permit, valid for 90 days, must be obtained from the Chesterfield Fire & EMS, Fire and Life Safety Division. Application for permit shall include: fee for permit, completed information form, site plan drawing of burn site, proof of liability insurance for party performing burn; 2. The burning shall take place on the premises of a local sanitary landfill which meets the provisions of the regulations of the Virginia Waste Management Board; 3. The material to be burned shall consist only of brush, tree trimmings, yard and garden trimmings, clean burning debris waste, or clean burning demolition waste; 4. All reasonable effort shall be made to minimize the amount of material that is burned; with the number and size of the debris piles approved by Chesterfield County Fire & EMS, Fire and Life Safety Division; 5. The location of the burning shall be a minimum of 500 feet from any occupied building unless the occupants have given prior written permission, other than buildings located on the property on which the burning is conducted. If the Chesterfield County Fire & EMS, Fire and Life Safety Division determines that it is necessary to protect public health and welfare, it may direct that the above cited distances be increased; 6. No materials may be burned in violation of the regulations of the Virginia Waste Management Board or the State Air Pollution Control Board. The exact site of the burning on a local landfill shall be established in coordination with the regional director and Chesterfield County Fire & EMS, Fire and Life Safety Division; no other site shall be used without the approval of these officials. Chesterfield County Fire & EMS, Fire and Life Safety Division shall be notified of the days during which the burning will occur; and 7. The permit holder must maintain liability insurance in the minimum amount of $1,000,000.00 general liability coverage at all times while burning is taking place. At the time of permit application, a certificate of insurance coverage shall be submitted to the fire marshal. 14-559 J J J 07/23/14 D. Sections A through C above notwithstanding, no owner or other person shall cause or permit open burning or the use of a special incineration device during the months of May, June, July, August, or September. 307.2.3 Permits. Add subsection 307.2.3 as follows: A. When open burning of debris waste or open burning of debris on the site of a local landfill is to occur within Chesterfield County, the person responsible for the burning shall obtain a permit from Chesterfield County Fire & EMS, Fire and Life Safety Division prior to the burning. Such a permit may be granted only after confirmation by Chesterfield County Fire & EMS, Fire and Life Safety Division that the burning can and will comply with the provisions of this ordinance and any other conditions which are deemed necessary to ensure that the burning will not endanger the public health and welfare or to ensure compliance with any applicable provisions of the State Air Pollution Control Board's Regulations for the Control and Abatement of Air Pollution. The permit may be issued for each occasion of burning or for a specific period of time deemed appropriate by Chesterfield County Fire & EMS, Fire and Life Safety Division. B. Prior to the initial installation (or reinstallation, in cases of relocation) and operation of special incineration devices, the person responsible for the burning shall obtain a permit from Chesterfield County Fire & EMS, Fire and Life Safety Division, such permits to be granted only after confirmation by Chesterfield County Fire & EMS, Fire and Life Safety Division that the burning can and will comply with applicable provisions in Regulations for the Control and Abatement of Air Pollution and that any conditions are met which are deemed necessary by Chesterfield County Fire & EMS, Fire and Life Safety Division to ensure that the operation of the devices will not endanger the public health and welfare. Permits granted for the use of special incineration devices shall at a minimum contain the following conditions: 1. All reasonable effort shall be made to minimize the amount of material that is burned. Such efforts shall include, but are not limited to, the removal of pulpwood, sawlogs and firewood. 2. The material to be burned shall consist of brush, stumps and similar debris waste and shall not include demolition material. 3. The location of the burning shall be a minimum of 500 feet from any occupied building unless the occupants have given prior permission, other than buildings located on the property on which the burning is conducted; burning shall be conducted at the greatest distance practicable from highways and air fields. If the Chesterfield County Fire & EMS, Fire and Life Safety Division determines that i.t is necessary to protect public health and welfare, he may direct that the above cited distances be increased. 4. The burning shall be attended at all times and conducted to ensure the best possible combustion with a minimum of smoke being produced. Under no circumstances should the burning be allowed to smolder beyond the minimum period of time necessary for the destruction of the materials. 14-560 07/23/14 5. The burning shall be conducted only when the prevailing winds are away from any city, town or built-up area. 6. The use of special incineration devices shall be allowed only for the disposal of debris waste, clean burning construction waste, and clean burning demolition waste. 7. Permits issued under this subsection shall be limited to a specific period of time deemed appropriate by Chesterfield County Fire & EMS, Fire and Life Safety Division. 307.2.4 Endangering Other Property. Add subsection 307.2.4 as follows: No person shall kindle or authorize to be kindled or maintain any permitted fire in such a manner that it will endanger the property of another. 307.2.5 Revocation of Permits. Add subsection 307.2.5: A. If any permit holder violates any provision of this ordinance or if any permit holder makes a material misrepresentation on a permit application, The Fire Marshal may require the extinguishments of the fire and the burn permit shall be subject to revocation; B. Permits may be revoked or suspended when smoke, ash or other hazards create a public health or safety concern. 307.4 Fees. Delete and substitute section 307.4 as follows: 1. There shall be no fees for the permit required by Section 307.2.2 (A) . 2. Fees for permits required by section 307.2.2 (B) and (C) and shall be $400.00 307.5 Attendance. Delete the words "Open burning". 308.1.4 Add the following sentences to the end of the opening paragraph of section 308.1.4, prior to the Exceptions, as follows: The owner or manager of any occupancy in Use Group R shall notify their tenants in writing of this code requirement at the time the tenants initially occupy the apartment and annually thereafter. A copy of this written notification shall be available for review by the code official. 308.1.4 Delete exception 2. 311.5 Placards. Delete and substitute section 311.5 as follows: Any building or structure that is vacant or abandoned and is determined by the fire official to be unduly dangerous to firefighting operations due to structural or interior hazards shall be marked as required by Sections 311.5.1 through 311.5.5 or marked as required by the fire official. 315.6 Materials Storage Regulation. Add subsection 315.6 as follows: No person shall store any combustible packing cases, boxes, barrels or similar containers or rubber tires, baled cotton, rubber, cork or other similarly combustible materials of a gross volume of greater than 2,500 cubic feet (70 m3) in any structure or on any premises, except under conditions approved by the code official. J J J 14-561 07/23/14 315.7 Storage, Park or Repair. Add subsection 315.7 as follows No person shall store, park or repair any vehicle, tool or equipment that has a fuel tank that contains a flammable or combustible liquid or liquefied petroleum gas as a source of fuel within or on any occupancy in Use Group R, or part thereof, unless such building or structure is built for the purpose of such storage, parking or repairing in accordance with all requirements of the Uniform Statewide Building Code and this code . The owner or manager of any occupancy in Use Group R shall notify their tenants in writing of this code requirement at the time the tenants initially occupy the apartment and annually thereafter. A copy of this written notification shall be available for review by the code official. This section shall not apply to detached one- and two-family dwellings unless such storage, parking or repairing is conducted as a business. Such businesses must then comply with all applicable provisions of the Uniform Statewide Building Code and the Chesterfield County Code. Chapter 5. Fire Service Features 502.1. General Definitions. Delete and substitute the following definition: Fire Lane. An area designated by clearly visible signs and/or markings in which parking shall be prohibited, whether on public or private property, to ensure ready access for and to fire fighting equipment and facilities. 503.8 Illegal Use. Add subsection 503.8 as follows: 1. No person shall park or leave an unattended vehicle in or otherwise obstruct with a vehicle any designated or marked fire lane. 2. No person shall place or locate any equipment, materials, or any other object in or otherwise obstruct any designated or marked fire lane. 3. The penalty for violation of section 503.8(1) shall be the same as outlined for other parking violations in the Chesterfield County Code. The penalty for violation of section 503.8(2) shall be the same as for all other violations of this chapter. Chapter 9 Fire Protection Systems 901.5.2 Altering or Changing Supervisory Services. Add subsection 901.5.2 as follows: The code official shall be notified prior to any alterations to the supervisory service equipment or if the agent providing supervisory service changes for any required fire protection system. Functional testing shall be conducted prior to the system being returned to service. The level of testing will be determined by the code official. All testing shall be conducted in the presence of the code official and appropriate documentation shall be provided to the code official to verify that the system is being supervised as designed and in accordance with the building code in effect at the time of installation. 901.6.1.1 Limited Area Sprinkler Systems. Add' subsection 901.6.1.1 as follows: 14-562 07/23/14 All limited area sprinkler systems shall be inspected annually and maintained according to NFPA 25 and in accordance with the following standards: 1. The sprinkler control valve shall be permanently marked with a sign stating "Sprinkler Control Valve." Markings made with embossed plastic tape, pencil, ink, crayon, or similar materials shall not be considered permanent. The sign shall be secured with noncorrosive wire, chain, or other means. 2. Markings shall be provided in a conspicuous place at the sprinkler control valve and shall state: "Notify the Fire Department (748-1251) before closing valve." 3. Valves connecting the limited area sprinkler system to the domestic water supply shall be locked open in an approved manner. 901.6.3 Reporting Results of Periodic Tests. Add subsection 901.6.3 as follows: The individual or company performing any test or inspection required under this article shall provide the code official with a complete written record of the test or inspection within 15 days after it is conducted. Such written record shall note plainly which standard, as referenced by this code, was used for the test or inspection. 901.12 Permits Required. All modifications, additions, or repair work beyond the scope of routine maintenance and inspections require permits issued by the Building Official in accordance with the Uniform Statewide Building Code. 904.11.1.1 Manual Operations. Add subsection 904.11.1.1 as follows: Instructions for manually operating the fire suppression system for the commercial kitchen exhaust system shall be posted conspicuously in the kitchen and shall be reviewed periodically with employees by the management. 904.11.6.4 Ventilation System. Add subsection 904.11.6.4 as follows: The ventilation system in connection with hoods shall be operated at the required rate of air movement, and classified grease filters shall be in place when equipment under a kitchen grease hood is used. Cooking appliances, which require a commercial kitchen exhaust hood system, shall not be operated while the fire suppression system or kitchen exhaust system is non-operational or otherwise impaired. 907.9 Nuisance Alarm Activations. Add section 907.9 as follows: The owner and/or the occupant of any structure served by a fire protection system which has activated on two or more occasions when no fire, unsafe condition or other hazard has occurred, shall repair the system or correct conditions which are causing the system to activate. Chapter 10. Means of Egress 1030.10 Marking Means of Egress follows: 14-563 Add subsection 1030.10 as 07/23/14 J J J The code official may require the means of egress through storage areas to be marked, and the owner or his agent shall be responsible for marking and maintaining such aisles as required. Chapter 50. Hazardous Materials - General Provisions 5002.1 Definitions. Delete and substitute the following definition: Hazardous Materials. Those chemicals or substances which are physical hazards or health hazards as defined and classified in this Chapter, whether the materials are in usable or waste condition, including flammable and combustible liquids. Chapter 56. Explosives and Fireworks 5601.1.3.1 Fireworks Prohibited. Add subsection 5601.1.3.1 as follows: Permissible fireworks, as defined in the Statewide Fire Prevention Code, shall not be possessed, stored, sold, used or handled in Chesterfield County. 5601.2.2.1 Violations. Add subsection 5601.2.2.1 as follows: No person shall store, possess, offer for sale, expose for sale, sell at retail or use or explode any fireworks or pyrotechnic special effect materials, except as provided in the rules and regulations issued by the code official for the granting of permits for supervised displays of fireworks or pyrotechnic special effect materials. 5608.1 General. Add the following text to 5608.1: A permit shall be required for the display of fireworks and pyrotechnic special effect materials. 5608.2 Permit Application. Add the following text to 5608.2: Application for permits shall be made in writing at least 60 days in advance of the date of the display or discharge of fireworks or pyrotechnic special effect materials. The sale, possession, discharge and distribution of fireworks or pyrotechnic special effect materials for display shall be lawful only under the terms and conditions, and for the purpose set forth in the permit. A permit shall not be transferable, and shall not extend beyond the dates set forth in the permit. Chapter 57. Flammable and Combustible Liquids 5704.1.1 Prohibited Storage. Add subsection 5704.1.1 as follows: The storage of flammable and combustible liquid shall be prohibited in occupancies of Use Group A, R-1, R-2, and in rental storage facilities. 5706.5.1.6 Fire Protection. Delete and substitute 5706.5.1.6 as follows: Whenever tank vehicles are automatically loaded with flammable liquids at bulk storage terminals without an employee in attendance, the loading rack area shall be protected by a completely automatic fire suppression system 14-564 07/23/14 approved by the code official. The system shall be designed to provide fire protection to both the loading rack and tank vehicles and shall be supervised by an accredited central station facility. Chapter 61. Liquefied Petroleum Gases 6101.4 Emergency Services. Add subsection 6101.4 as follows: Anyone who supplies liquefied petroleum gas service shall have a qualified maintenance person available at all times to assist fire department personnel with emergency incidents involving the service. 6109.13 Delete and substitute section 6109.13 as follows: Protection of Containers. Containers shall be placed in a suitable enclosure or otherwise protected against tampering. The enclosure shall be secured to the sidewalk, concrete pad, or building to avoid tipping or movement of the enclosure. The servicing company's name and 24-hour phone number and "NO SMOKING" signs shall be provided and maintained on the enclosure. Vehicular protection shall be provided as required by the fire official. APPENDICES The following appendices of the International Fire Code, 2012 Edition shall be an enforceable part of this code: Appendix B - Fire-flow Requirements for Buildings Appendix C - Fire Hydrant Locations and Distribution Appendix D - Fire Apparatus Access Roads Exception: Section D106 and Section D107 shall not be included in this code. (2) That this ordinance shall become effective immediately upon adoption. Ayes: Holland, Elswick, Jaeckle, Warren and Gecker. Nays: None. 18.B. TO CONSIDER AN AMENDMENT TO THE FBO SERVICES AND LEASE AGREEMENT WITH DOMINION AVIATION SERVICES, INCORPORATED Mr. Driscoll, Airport Administrator, stated this date and time has been advertised for the Board to consider an amendment to the FBO services and lease agreement with Dominion Aviation Services, Incorporated. He further stated the item was deferred from the May 28, 2014 meeting. He stated at this time, differences in terms and conditions of the proposed amendment remain unresolved to the satisfaction of both parties. He further stated therefore, staff recommends that the Board hold the public hearing as advertised. in order to receive public comment but take no action on the proposed amendment. He stated county staff will continue to negotiate with Dominion in an effort to reach a mutually beneficial agreement and will bring the matter back before the Board at the appropriate time. J J J 14-565 07/23/14 Mr. Holland called for public comment. There being no one to speak to the issue, the public hearing was closed. Mr. Mincks stated once an effort is made to reach a mutually beneficial agreement, staff will bring the matter back before the Board at the appropriate time. He noted a new public hearing will be advertised. No action was taken. 19. REMAINING MANUFACTURED HOME PERMITS AND ZONING REQUESTS There were no remaining requests for manufactured home permits or rezoning at this time. 20. FIFTEEN-MINUTE CITIZEN COMMENT PERIOD ON UNSCHEDULED MATTERS There were no requests to address the Board at this time. 21. ADJOURNMENT On motion of Mr. Warren, seconded by Mr. Elswick, the Board adjourned at 9:27 p.m. until August 27, 2014. Ayes: Holland, Elswick, Jaeckle, Warren and Gecker. Nays: None. Ms. Jaeckle expressed her disappointment relative to how slowly staff is moving in order to pursue revitalization efforts within the county. Mr. Holland expressed his appreciation to those in attendance. // J es/J. egm er ount dministrator 14-566 07/23/14