Loading...
01-12-1972 Packet At a regular meeting of the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County, Virginia, held on January 12, 1972, in the Board Room at Chesterfield Court House, Virginia. RESOLUTION WHEREAS, the State Department of Welfare and Institution has promulgated a plan outlining its proposal for the "takeover" and "administration" of all locally administered welfare programs within the State for submission to the 1972 General Assembly; and WHEREAS, the Chesterfield County Department of Social Services has served, now serves and will continue to serve the citizens of the County of Chesterfield and the City of Colonial Heights effectively and efficiently with untiring diligence and devotion to the people unsurpassed, which service stands widely recognized and publicly acclaimed by the many ci~s and commendations awarded to it; and, WHEREAS, the Chesterfield County Department of Social Services continues to serve the State, and other jurisdictions, as a model agency among agencies; and, WHEREAS, the members of the Chesterfield County Board of Social Services are strongly opposed to state administration of its welfare programs; and, WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County Virginia, deem it unwise, impractical and against the best intere; of the County of Chesterfield and the City of Colonial Heights md their citizens for the State to "takeover" and "administer" it~ Department of Social Services. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County, Virginia, be and they are hereby opposed to any state "takeover" and "administration" of it: Department of Social Services. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Executive Secretary deliver copies of this Resolution to each of the County's representatives in the General Assembly and urge them to broadcasl the opposition expressed in this resolution and solicit support against State administration of its Department of Social Services ~;OUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD' CHESTERFIELD, VIRGINIA III. SI0,07 S. SO :Z4,S71.65 IoquoR from J. R. Bailey for rater ~e4notou to Lo~ 12, Block B, of~ FAIIiIS ~ Farm. IV. Apprereal of ameer ITI-41GD 74~1 V~ Merd of limr Omtrett 171-3~, Ibtr~ md bom, ht th mt of 024,539.00 ~o Van eom Onu~tton baood on the uM of eouereto ptpo. (a) BwLee of. j~ua of Mheon Creek mm~r eomeetioM. (b) ~ letter of Jammry 3, ~72 frou a. G. XarU eoueern~ eeuaeetio~ ~o Aehtou Creek lqoon.  VIZ. be/iv and approval of oeMor ~ ~D 172 1~ 1-9~ 17~ 17i-(CD (b) Bursa Avgnuo adJseent to 1-95 VIII, by'de of stratum of bllvood minor Lasoeu. awvLoe p~opooalm for ens~~ uurk for new Mhton Creek (a) LRker of ~ 6, 1972, St. ttuer~ Ioyer & Aaeoe~. ¢~) LR~r of ~mum~ 7, l~Ta, J. K. Timuas & ddsoeLteeo. (a) Old buu Creek Lqoou°euwr (b) heuLqom COUNTY Of CHESTERFIELD CHESTERFIELD, VIRGINIA XZ. Apprav&~ o2 Chmq;e Ordor Ho. 3, Sram= Con,mt 6Sll-33B.  XIZ. bool~t::Lon dmr. horisLug ~ion proeoodLusa qi~t t~e rolls,us propeRte8 ~ ~ Vira~nh ~ V71-61Cl)/4 IO0.O0 b'71-61C/)/$ 50.00 1971, ~o~ug $1s6:Lg.82, be eh~r~ of£ fm uneol:biRib:Le. BobeR A. Paf. u~Fr ~ 1~ 1972 SEABOARD COAST LINE RAILROAD COMPANY Rec~ Mouat, ~ ~4ro.lAna. 27801. December 20, 19~1. File~ 3.~1~ Beaz~ of ~apervtmerm of Cbmaterfield ~y, C~esterfAeld, Virginia. 23~32. , X hivu been advise~ by e~r ~ee of l~y l~art~at that the weeds at the erceslq of amader, artdge ~ead v~re e~t ~ tht~ e~miag on Dooembor ?. ]:om'm ver2 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS IRVING. HORNER, CHAI'RMAN CLOVER HILL DISTRICT C. J. PURDY BERMUDA DISTRICT J. RUFFIN APPERSON DALE DISTRICT MANCHESTER DISTRICT HERBERT O. BROWNING M ATOACA DISTRICT ANDREW R, MARTIN MIDLOTHIAN DISTRICT COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD CHESTERFIELD, M. W. BURNETT EXECUTIVE SECRETARY VIRGINIA December 22, 1971 Mr. M.W. Burnett, Executive Secretary Chesterfield County Chesterfield, Virginia 23832 Dear Mr. Burnett, If possible, will you obtain authorization for the Department of General Services to sell the old surplus 30 watt radios, at today's board meeting? These units are worth $40.00 on a trade-in basis, however, I have found a buyer willing to give $150.00 each as is. I have discussed this thoroughly with Mr. Manuel and he concurs with this recommendation. Thank you for your interest. Sincerely, Chief of Department CHESTERFIELD FIRE DEPARTMENT RLE: j rb cc: Mr. C.G. Manuel, Director of General Services "~COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD INTRACOUNTY CORRESPONDENCE December 17, 1971 TO: F ROM: SUBJECT: Mr. M. W. Burnett J. R. condrey~/ 1971-72 Budget - Fire Training In November we received $600.00 from ~aPont as payment for training their Fire Brigade. The $600.00 was credited to revenue. chief Eanes requested me to ask the Supervisors on December 22~ to appropriate $600.00 from Unappropriated Surplus to: 11-073-104.0 11-073-311.0 11-073-322.0 Compensation of Instructors Fuel Training Supplies $300.00 200.00 100.00 JRC:gc 3enuazy L0, L972 M~. Robert A. Pa~ter County of Cheste~£LeLd. Cheetarfield, Va.. The follo~i~.~ propercy omar, h.~e re~used use of their Land for proposed rater construction:. OWHER Ma~ V~8~m£a Bu~foot ~;TL-~sCD-1/6 ;;ate= $ 3~5.00 Paul J. Atkins & Anna B. Acki~lt (wife) W71-6LCD/4 Water Thouas M. Taylor & Cazxie H.. Taylor (wife) W7 L-6 lCD/5 ~:do mt feel thac L~rthar naSotiatJ~ns viii be o£ auy value, the=afore, tt is ou~sasted that oondsMmatLon procaedfAss be instituted. Sf~eerely,. A. $.,B;Le~es Rlsht of ~ay En_.~neer Am/nb Copies ~o: Irvin G. ~Hornar, Super"aloof -Clo~r Httl D~striet J. C. FaI~u~, ~ty ~8aer ~. ~. B~ett, ~utive $~reta~ ~0 VtI~ iNI A PLAT Sc, L,WI~,U PRCPCSED 15' WATER EASEmeNT ALG',G PR."~:ER'!' ' :": ':~ " . zL, ~, I T(.: ~ARr','' ViRGIL<lA ~'~ ~'(.~-T AS ~Co~ED IN DEED 7~COK 394 PAGE .~. CLCVER :{ILL DISTRICT CHm~TERFIELD COL:,,.I ~ VIRGILIA ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT CHESTERFIELD COUNTY VIRGINIA SCALE I REVIStO~S /,~:._..... ,-. , j DRAWN ' -' ~-E J '"':"' '' DA "E I REASO~ ' PLAT SHOWING PROPOSED (15'~, WATER EAS~clE~;T ALONG PROPERTY n~ELOIqGI~G TO PAUL J. AND A~NA Bo ATK~NS AS RE-CORDED ii: DEED i~OOK 250, PAGE 147, Alamo DEED ~K 315, PAGE 14." ............................... , CL~VZR ~ILL ~!STP-.ICT C.'..{EST~.FIMLD C~L~Y ~ VIRGINIa& : ALONG PROPERTY A~LLR AS RECOt~DED IN DEED BOOK 280, PAGE 84. C~R HILL DISTRICT G}~STE~IELD COU~y VIRG~ COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD .. ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT STREET NAME RECOMMENDATION TO: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS It is recommended that the Sherbourne Road which enters Hopkins Road from the East be renamed Panola Road. This road is a dedicated road that has just Peen cut in. 'Date Recommended by Approved by cc: Engineering Department August 23, 197] 2709 W:L].!ard Road ~iov. 30, 1965 - l~i~t'Lngs $209.74 i'~ov. 30, 1965 - Fittings 153.82 $363.56 Robert E. Harris (Bankrupt) 10813 b'[id'io~hian Pike 'Richmond ~ Septe'~"~ber 30~ 1.966 - $45.17 Repai~: Septemlocr 30~ 1966 - 67.42 Repair. October 7, 1966 - 18.00 Rent of Equipment January 16, 1967 - 26.13 Rent of Equipment $156.72 J. L. Kent Construction Co~ (Statue of Limitations) 3510 A~no'ns Avenue Richmond, Virginia June 28, 1966 - Inovice 1670 - 1676 $585 Landscapin~ Enz]neering Assoc. ~ Inc.~. 4702 Wistar Road September 10, 1966 (Statue of I,imitations) $60. 3z b~itland Elect. Co., Inc. (Out of Business) P. O.~Box 765 $15.1~ Miller & Smith (Statue of Limitations) Harrowgate Road October 21, 1963 $11.5. S, R. R.i_g~ensbu_r_g~ R. F.D. 1 Glen Allen, Virginia June 28, 1966 (Statue of Limitations) $16.8 George W. Sr~ith: Builder P. O. Box 657 (Out of Business) $9.9 Southeastern Const. Co. P. O. Box 576 (Out of Business) $62.2~ ~..~z_.j!~g. staff( Statue of Limitations ) Foi:esthill Avenue - ..... ~ pO~2A October 27, 1966, Invo~.ce No. !79~ B~!~n. ce due on ~ontract ,:~v I.Undsor Corp. ]Si25 N. Hamilton Street '"' "" '~ " P,a~.'~n,"e due on ~z'¢~, 23, .,9o7 - Invoice No !98a, .9.4.5: ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE REPORT DECEMBER 31, 1971 ALPINE CONSTRUCTION,, ,COJ! 165.3,8 ARCHIE BUIE. DERS,, ii 22.82 jl 22.82 ATLANTIC PUMP , 84.91 84.91 BALDWIN ~ONSTRUCTION, ii 116.27. jj FRED BARNES 53. L t2 53.42' 90 DA~Y$' ' 6 MONTHS !1: Z.YEAR OR TO 6 MONTH.~ TO i YEAR ijOVER 165.38 JOHN P. BL~CK INC. H BROOK HILL~CONSTRUCTIOD C & R BATTERY · CAPITAL SERVICE CO, , W. S. CARN~S INC./ CHESTERFIELD chunky' SCHOOL IOARD , CITY OF RICHMOND COSBY LANDSCAPING ROBERT E,. COSBY DELTA CONSTRUCTION DEPARTMENTi. OF ARMY (BELLWOOD,) ii JAMES D.', DEPRIEST DURRETT ~CO~, STRUCT ION G.E. & WADE EATMON LEONARD L. ilFARBER GENERAL 'FU~D[I C.L. HARTMAN CONST. HAWTHORNE EXCAVATORS R. D. HOLDERFIELD ~ w.M._.U B RD. , l" d~d. JEWE~T KANE PLUMBING & HEATING. GEO. g C'HA~. KCRAG~T ~ LANDSCAPING ENGINEER. i; J. W. LAWLER CON'STR. 83.57 !: 1934.~0 47,00 82.60 I 51648.40 4556.48 19.75 I 48.31 i {i 3-11 j! 83. 7!! 128.97 ,, 37610.?0 19.!5 82.60 48. 1 51.~2 40.00 125000.00 62.83 22.~1 51. '2 125000. 22. 15. { 42.?1 39363.~6 756.~9 572.68 363.56 156.72 28.86 ..241.21 39363.76 756.~9 28.86 , 516.19 51.67 364.26 113.55 27.19 113 .'55 27 9 : 58639. 2 58639.,E2, 1.3920. O0 i: ~ t{ 60.34 ii [ 1{ 23.18 23.18' 1017 ti 788.2~ 47.0t: 14037 62.[3 42. 1 572.68 363.5E 156.72 241.2 516.1~ 1392o.bo ;! I 585.65 60.34 ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE REPORT DECEMBER 31, 1971 PAGE 2 BALANCE / CURRENT ' 90 DAYS TO'i NAME ~I M W. LAWRENCE CONSTR. ~iLINNHAVEN ~OURT 'MAITLAND ELECTRIC CO.. ? R. G. MART:~j__I_NC. 145.69 ii 145.69 ~ ~_0. Q_._0.~o_ :. ~.o.o_.._0_o ': 6 MONTHS :!1 YEAR OR TO I YEAR :,OVER 694.06 65.~2 15.i0 ' t , 106.23 ,;MCGUiIRE VE~'ERANS HOSP. " 115.~0 I. 115.20 Ii MILLER &:, S/~,ITH I 11.5~5 J! j J t 11.,~5 OMEGA, LTDil I 12606 65" 12606 REALTY INDUSTRIES i 46 ~4 46 '4 J RICHMOND~M~TRO. AUTH~. ~ .... 16.~3 INER CONSTRUCTION C0. 497.49 ~OANO~E CONSTrUCTiON ~' t ~ ~ 19.66 ,, 19.~6 ~ -~: ..... 576. ~ OLIVER D~ ~UDY , ]2]~.8~' W. A. SA~D~IDGE ~ ~ CHARLES SI~LEY ~ 57'~3 " ~ ...... 57.~3 ' 18 . 24 ~ i 18 . , . ~ 9.~5 .......... , ..... 9. SOUTHEASTERN CONSTR : 62.~ ; i ...................... 62 ~ I~ ~ '" ~ ............. ~ 225. STATE WATER CONTROL BD 523 20 523 ~0 SWEARINGEN~'REALTY cO [~ " ' ~ : ~ ............ I _ I TAVI nD rn~n ~TR. 18.65 .' UTILITIES DEPT. SAM. T, WAGSTAFF I~ j. A. WALDER INC. I1 ' P. R. WA L CE i 12095.33 332.94 111.48 290.00 t i 12095.33 jJ . . ! . iii.~,8 ~ ] h ti .. WARD & STANCIL INC. O' L. WARR~NER j WILMORE BUILDERS ~,..~I.4MORE REALTY INC. JOHN. A., Z~UN ;J - lO4.2o - lO4.2o ..... 25.3~9 ....... 25. 9 ~ " 4.94" 331110.41 288181.02 'i 18.65 290L 0 954.58~t ; 332 94 220.~0 4.~4 .56.80 30495.q8 !i I1479.33 Jauuary 10, 1972 ENON LAGOON Des ign Capacity Alienable Load (95% of Design) Present Load (i,oo9 @ ~.6) Com~'.~itted: 11 Homes TOTAL People 1,200 1,140 1,121 @ 4 44 1,165 J~n~z~r 5, 1972 BET.T.WOOD MANOR .D~stgn Capacity People 2,000 Allowable Lpad (95% of Design Capacity) 1,900 Present: Load (Nov. 1970~ .COMMITTED: S71-24D - Ramada Inn Motel - 100 Units - 100 People Res~urant- 126 People 226 S?I-26D - Travel Trailer Park - 100 Spaces 100 S71-28D - Econo Travel MoteI - 48 Units 48 S71-32CD - Truck Sales 10 Burge Avenue - Commercial (10 Acres) TOTAL 100 ' 484 1,180 1,664 236 January 5, 1972 Design Capacity Allo~able. Load, 957° of Design Load (Now. 1971) 1. Lake Tree Apts. - 40 Units 2. Creenleigh Trailer Park - 64 Paid 186 by Contract 3. School - Sou~h Chester Rd. - 600 Pupils 4. Thomas - 120 Unit Motel, 96 Seat Restatrant, 3~ Acres commercial §. Alexander Motors 6. Hyde Park - 400 Units 7. Holiday Inn Addition 8. Res~trant - Rt. 1 across from John Tyler 9. Pillow Mobile Home Park - 49 Trailers 10. Hidden Valley, Section 3 I1. Hidden Valley, Section 2, 4, 5 & 6 People 4,050 3,800 120 75O 120 230 4 1,200 68 2O I47 116 628 '3~,403 Sewers Installed - Development not complete 12. Gay Farms - 13 Lots with sewer laterals installed 52 Others 13. Sunoco Station -Rt. 10 - Easement will be required to extend sewer to Thomas and Pillow property. 5 14. American Station, Rt. 10 - Same as # 13 7 1~. Evans Property (Hubbard) 15 Acres Co~m,rcial 18 Acres R-1 460 16. Homestead Motel - 12 Unit Motel) 2 Trailers ) Existing I Apts. ) Proposed 20 Unit Motel Addition 41 17. Longest - Adjacent to Hyde Park, 15 Acres Apts., 540 1,201 :4,604 4,656 ASHTON CREEK - Continued 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. 26. Coyne Chevrolet 20 48 Unit Motel, Res~ant (Martz) 1~0 Petersburg Mutual 8 ~ke~ree - R~der of ? Cay F~ Addlt~n S~dtvtsfon - Old Chester Couch - ~rt~ - Rt. 10 & 22 Acres Co~ercial 1,800 - 2,700 From-Page 1 ~DTOTAL 3,901 4,656 8,557 -2- January 10, 1972 OLD TOWN CR.E~K .Design Capacity Allowable Load (95% of Design) Total Applications as-of November 1971 338 Homes Bu/ldtng Permits issued - Sewer not applied for. Trojan Woods 4 Homes Hickory Hill Estates 19 Homes ~atoa~a Middle School TOTAL In addition there are approximately 154 lo~ in new subdivisions and approx~m~_tely 126 · xist~ng houses o~ lots with service laterals ~-stalled, which is equivalent to approximately TOTAL People 1,127 1,166 1,216 14 68 210 1,508 2,51.6 WATER SUPPLY SEWERAGE SYSTEMS SEWAGE DISPOSAL PARTNERS = l, N. KOON1-Z, P.E. J. A. LIMERICK. JR.. P.E. E. F. MASBIEo JR., P. E. W. CARLE THURSTON ADMINISTRATOR R. STUART ROYER & ASSOCIATES CONSULTING ENGINEERS 1;[14 WILLOW LAWN DRIVE P. O, BOX 8687 RICHMOND, VIRGINIA 23226 AREA CODE 703 282-76;[7 R, STUART ROYER, P.E. SPECIAl. CONSULTANTS: EDWARD Ho RUENL, P.E. E. R. SHARP, P.E. December 9, 1971 REPORTS DESIGNS APPRAISALS ASSOCIATES: R. O. PURYEAR, JR., P.E. S. P. TANSILL, P,E. T. I~. TURNER, JR., P.E. HERBERT WILEY CONSTRUCTION SUPERVISION Mr. R. A. Painter, County Engineer County of Chesterfield Chesterfield Courthouse Chesterfield, Virginia 23832 Enon Lagoon Project 6102-42A Dear Mr. Painter: In accordance with your letter of November 9, 1971, we have studied the alternatives available for increasing the capacity of the Enon Sewage Treatment Facilities from a population equivalent of 1,200 to 3,600. The present treatment facility is a single-cell conventional lagoon having a surface area of three acres. The original State ~ater Control Board Certifi- cate for this lagoon was issued on a loading of 400 persons per acre. On June 8, 1971, we sent to the State Health Department preliminary calcula- tions for converting this lagoon to an aerated type. On September 15, 1971, we received from the Health Department their comments on our proposal. They in effect rejected our proposal in that they will require daal units -2- (two separate lagoons), increasing the pond depth from four to eight feet, and they are critical of cold weather operation of aerated lagoons. The State Water Control Board has set a BOD removal efficiency of 8?% for this facility. To construct an additional pond requires that six or seven acres of land be obtained. Conceivably, the new pond would be constructed and all the flow would be diverted to that pond wbdle the old pond's depth is increased. To increase the depth of a pond as old as this one would be quite an undertaking as the bottom will be wet and muddy presenting problems in using earth moving equipment, There would also be the problem of disposing of waste material. The largest drawback to aerating the lagoons is the Health Department's position on cold weather operation. They have made a study of several aerated lagoons and have found that in the winter the ponds will partially freeze and treatment efficiency is materially decreased. With a State Water Control Board requirement of 87% BOD removal, it is doubtful that an efficiency .of that magni- tude can be maintained at all times. From our discussions with members of the staff of the Health Department it appears that aerated lagoons may be phased out because of cold weather operation requirements. Nevertheless, we investigated the possibility of dividing the existing lagoon in two sections in order to meet the requirement for dual units. This could be done utilizing a dividing ~.mll of sheet piling or asbestos-cement structural sheets attached to piles driven in the bottom of the pond. With minor changes in the configuration of the resulting two cells, the contents could be aerated utilizing brush type aerators rather than conventional spray aerators. The resulting facility would be two so-called oxidation ditches. This approach would not require deepening the pond, therefore,the present treatment could be maintained while the improvements are being made. We believe this would be the least expensiw means of increasing the capacity, however, it is doubtful that approval of the Health Department could be obtained because of the possibility of reduced efficiency during cold weather. Next, consideration was given to providing separate aeration facilities and using the existing pond in its present state as a second step in the treatment process. We proposed the construction of an aeration basin followed by the lagoon with an additional settling tank for the lagoon effluent. There are flow sheets using this method, however, the Health Department was of the opinion that even though the aeration tanks were designed on the extended aeration basis, which places the biological floc in the range of endogenous respiration, there would ultimately be sludge problems in the lagoon. O~r purpose in proposing this flow sheet was to eliminate separate sludge digestion and drying from the process. We believe the flow sheet has merit but it is doubtful that outright approval of the Health Department could be obtained. The remaining alternatives were to consider the construction of separate new treatment facilities and to use the existing lagoon in its present form as an effluent polishing pond. Present State Water Control Board policy is to allow a 3% BOD reduction for a polishing pond. The principal treatment facility when used with a pond need therefore have only an efficiency of 84%. It appears that the most satisfactory method of enlarging the facility is to construct two 1,800 population package treatment plants utilizing the con- tact stabilization method of treatment. The effluent from the contact stabili- zation plant would receive additional treatment in the existing lagoon. There is ample land available on the present County-owned property for the new plant and no additional land need be acquired. We propose that the new ~nits be of steel construction mounted on a concrete slab on grade. It is necessary to pump raw sewage regardless of the type of treatment if the existing lagoon is utilized. There are definite econo- mies to be gained utilizing steel construction. Consideration should also be given to employing screw pumps to lift the raw sewage to the treatment units rather than conventional sewage pumps. Screw pumps, by their nature,pump at a variable rate even though the screw turns at a constant speed. The amount of liquid pumDed by a screw pump is a variable depending on the depth of the liq~,id at the bottom of the screw. Screw pumps are ideal for low lift applications and require a minimum of maintenance. The plant as proposed would employ aerobic digestion of sludge. We suggest that no sludge drying beds be provided at this location, rather the sludge can be periodically hauled by tank truck to the Falling Creek Treatment Plant for de~tering and disposal. To co~ly with current requirements auxiliary power must be provided at the plant. A standby gasoline or diesel generator housed in a simple struc- ture would be adequate. -5- Only the most £ttudamental laboratory facilities would be included as major analytical tests would be run at the Falling Creek Plant. Facilities would be provided for making routine operating tests at this plant. We estimate the construction cost of the pumping station, plant con- raining duplicate 1,800 population units, standby power, etc. would be about $213,OOO. Allowing 20% for Engineering and Oontingencies, the project cost would be about $256,000. The above plant would be adequate for a population of 3,600. The use of above grade steel construction has the further advantage that the units could be salvsged and relocated after the Johnson Creek system is constructed eliminat- ing the need for a separate treatment facility at Enon. It is our conclusion that the most satisfactory solution for increas- ing the capacity of the Enon Treatment Plant is by the addition of duplicate 1,8OO population above grade steel contact stabilization package plants. Respectfully submitted, R. STUART ROYER & ASSOCIATES JAL: jp GENERAL 1714 EAST WASHINGTON STREET TELEPHONE 733-8637 · construction COF]9. CONTRACTORS p.O. BOX 588 · PETERSBURG, VIRGINIA 23803 January 3, 1972 Mr. M. W. Burnett Executive Secretary County o£ Chester£ield Chester£ield, Virginia 23832 RE: Sewer Oormection Route No. 10 and No. 1 Dear Mr. Burnett: I am writing in regard to our conversation on the phone, concerning sewer connection for proposed restaurant and motel on Route 10. Enclosed is all the correspondence, beginning with letter to American Oil Company, the owners, which they forwarded to me as I am under contract to buy the property, also my answer to Mr. Painter in which I gave my plans. Later I talked in person ~th Mr. Welchons and checked the plat to see how we could reach the sewer main from proposed building location. After talking with him a second time he said to write a formal letter with deposit, showing good faith. This I did, later receiving a letter from Mr. Painter stating no room for my sewer connection, and returning my check. I bought the land with the understanding sewer was available. I have tried to comply with Mr. Painter's letter to American 0il Company. I have requested rezoning, signed preliminary lease for restaurant, and now am await- ing final approval o£ loan for motel. This puts me in an embarrasing position, as well as a tremendous money set back, if I can't make sewer connections. I am willing to carry out pay- ment of sewer fees as required. I am appealing to you for help, in that I am at a loss as to exactly what I have to do. Very truly yours, R. G. MARTZ CONSTRUCTION CORP. t cc: Mr. Louis Longest Mr. Robert A. Paint~gBuildlng ~ Greater Community" COUNT.Y OF C H E-ST E R Fi E L D CHESTERFIELD. VIRGINIA September 23, 1971 1,,<: .' Sewe~ Conneccion,..~ - As,:ton Creek Sewerage Frcilit~es American Oil Company O4r&' Post Office Box 507 6""E~. "~" g'altimore, Maryland 21203 :'--'~?. ,/ ~ ~ ,," t' Gentlemen: . C. ~. A sewer extension to serve your property in the t~oute 1 Routeto suffici~tl0 'area-has prepaid been connections authorized by the Board of Supervisors subject bein3jm,4de, to finance the proj~2ct. ~e Asbton Creek sewage treatment plant, which serves this property,~isalllimitedof M in its capacity. Because o~ this, thc County is expressedc°ntactin~an interest-ne propertYin ~- .: = ~°~e~s ~e~zed by this facilicy who have o~ua~n~ng sewer service. %his service will Lc ~271d~ available on ~rs~-co~e first-[~e~e basis. The o~crs ar~ beir~ ,Pdvised that the prepaid c r ~,_oe~.~ ltv and the o~,nections.,~_ will be rcquired in or~;3r to caDac__~, m~;ntnzy servfce cbcrLe~.~ will bc eLaowingj a rensor~ablei in length of time f:~r the building of pre, posed i'2o_ects. S_nce, your cr~e, it is i:nportan~ that the Co.~.ty' ~ k.~ow t:~ de3ires of the property owners in the area before desir,-~:,,:~.., arc :~acc~' '- . , .........¢.~- ex ,--.,:,~u.., ..... zequcs~:Lng a reply from you ,;c an ear!y GENERAL 1 5 ] f ~=A'ST w' AS H NGTON STREET P.O. BOX 588 TELl:PHONE 733-8637 corl:,. CONTRACTORS · PETERSBURG, VIRGINIA 23803 ~Buildlng A Greater Community" COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD CHESTERFIELD, VIRGINIA Re: Se~er Connection to Ash~on Creek in Route i - Route 10 Area ~..~ R G ' '~-- President ,l. G. :.~..tz Construction Corporation 1714 gasg Washington Street Petersburg, Virginia 23803 Dear Mr. Martz: T~is will ackncw!edg¢ your letter of October 14, 1971 concerning the property you purchased from the ;~nerican Oil Company. '~'~,-','~o~ of the limited capacity of the treatment " ' '? :~' the .... ~,~ ', ' ~aci]..t_,.s, co ....... ctzons will ~)e n;~de on a first-borns firs:- serve basis and I shall be .glad to discuss this n~mtter with you fur th~.r. Very truly yours, Robert A. Painter County Engineer P~AP: id MAP~0V ASSOC~ATE~, INC. PETERSBURG, VIRGINIA December 20, 1971 Utility Department County of Chesterfield Chesterfield, Virginia 23832 ATTTh Mr. David H. Welchors RE: Sewer Line Route 1 a Route 10 Parcel 3-1 Section 116-11 Gentlemen: We would like to confirm our request for sewer connection service on the American Oil property on Route 10, adjoining Holiday Inn nea~ Route 1. We expect to get possession of the property in January. We have applied for re~oning of the rear~ acres. As soon as possible, w~ hope to start a small 30 seat restaurant, for which w~ will need sewer service by April 15, 1972. We propose to build a 48unitmotel immediately behind the present American Oil Station We expect to need sewer service for this by June 1, 1972. Enclosed. is $500.0Odeposit for this service. As soon as we get ou~deed and zoning, we can increase this deposit if necessary. Thank you for your continued cooperation. Very t~uly yours, NARNOV ASSOCIATES, INC. R~i: Jb Encl. COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD CHESTERFIELD Vl rtGINIA Pecember 23, 3.971 Mr. R. G. ~artz, President Marnov Associates, Incorporated 2~,., EasC Washington Street Petersburg, VirEinia 23803 bear Mr. t.(mrtz: Re: Se~.;er Service Route 1 - Route 10 ~-mericam Oil Property Parcel 3-1, Section 116-7 ,.our letter of December 2(~, 1971. to Mr. David ,U. Welchons, Assistant County l']nCineer, concerning sewer services for the al)ore proF, erty :sas considered by the Board of' Supervisor~ at their meeting on December 22, 1971. ~e Boar,.[ ~.~as unable to enter into a contract with you as all of the available connections to the Ashton Creek Lagoon bare been allocated. If, for any reason, additional connections should becom3 available, we ~..~iiI get in cont,~:ct wick .you. A.C this meeting, the Board of Supe~isors did aathortze the EngineeringS_ ~'~e.~.zt;~entp.~' '- ~' to proceed w~th. . the necessa~ en~i~earing, s ;~'~ selection, ~.?~rova]. of re~.'.al~c.o~7 .oc.,,ctc~, -- ~'-" '~ ~ etc. for thc construction of a ?~'oposed Se-;,~%:.7;e trea~tont plant on Aohton Crock. t...e ,,;~.o~=nt of ore:~aj.d conuection8 a'va~laple to help finance t~zo · ~roj2ct. If ~.,., "re ~.nterested in Ci"is ty()e of participntion, --~ · ..'_r,,_ ret,~!.n: yo n: $500.~]:0 deposit. Very tr.~ly yo~zrs, Lobe A. Painter Co,.~n tv En~ineer COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD (For Intracounty Correspondence) DATE: January 4, 1972 TO: Mr. M. W. Burnett, Executive Secretary FROM: Start R. Balderson, Jr., Senior Planner SUBJECT: Variance RequeSt - Claudie Swinson's property, Jan. 12, 1972 This parceI is ~zoned Agricultural (A) as are all adjacent properties with 'the excepltion of"that property to the northeast which is zoned General Business ~(C_2)~. This request is made in order to allow the construction of a single family dwelling (indicated "Jim Walters Home") to occur on the parcel-in question. This parcel does not have required street ~frontage ~(Sec. 14-10). Zn revieWing the request Planning Staff is of the opinion that future land uses in the'are~ will eVolVe as ~commercial and/or high density residential development.· Existing oomme~cial and multi-family zoning and land uses couPled withan intersecting minor arterial street ~ (Rt. 360)and a major collector' street (Turner Road) intensifies the potential for~ the estabIishment of this growth pattern. If. uninhibited, scattered single family units are constructed in the area, then lack'of comparability between this type of use and future higher intensity deveIopment may result. In this particular instance 'the ParceI in question is land locked making it unsuitable for residential purposes. This, in effect, offers assistance in land use ControI for the Prot'ection of the areas' future ~development potential. Therefore, Staff would recommend denial of this request and that the parcel owner be advised of area development trends and potential so that he might take best advantage of the Situation. COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD (For Intracounty Correspondence) TO: FROM: SUBJECT: DATE: December 20, 1971 Mr. M. W. Burnett, Executive Secretary Mr. Stanley R. Balderson, Jr., Senior Plann~ Variance Request - Claudie Swinson Property It should be pointed out that the location of this property is in close proximity to Commercial zoning (C-2) which extends along Wayside Drive southwardly from Hull Street Road. More specifically, the property in question is adjacent to a parcel to the northeast which is zoned General Business (C-2). Future land use in this area will more than likely develop commercially or assume high density Re- sidential portions. Should the Board see fit to grant the Variance requested then the parcel should be rezoned to the residential (R-I) classification and all zoning ordinance regulations, concerning building locations, should be met. ~'COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD INTRACOUNT¥ CORRESPONDENCE December 17, 1971 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: Mr. M. W. Burnett J. R. Condrey Land Purchased from Continental Can On December 8 the Supervisors resolved that the County purchase 91.13 acres at $1,150.00 per acre but did not appropriate funds for the purchase. Please ask the Supervisors on December 22 to appropriate $104,800.00 from Unappropriated Surplus to 11-500-600.0, Purchase of Land. JRC:gc 0 © January 6, 1972 E. M. 0neill 21200 Orange Hill Avenue Ettrick, Va. 23803 Dear Mr. 0neill: We the undersigned have been advised that Louis W. Powers has requested rezoning of property, designated lot seven, in Schmidt Sub-division on Pauline Avenue, from residential to business zoning under use-permit. We consider this a misuse of property in question~ in as much as it will introduce busi- ness use into a solid residential community. We respectively request your favorable consideration in this instance. 2-2 ~o RE ~'tSED ACA BOARDS AND CO].E4ISSIONS Planning Commission J. R. Henshaw M. T. Dubus Gordon B. Marshall Charles E. Hawkins Elbert Howard H. O. Browning Board of Zoning ~~ Thomas H. West Aubrey W. Gill B. Chewning Watkins Nathaniel M. Collier, Jr. L. Hunter Beaztey, Jr. School Electoral Board Dr. Henry H. Dodge W. H. (Rex) Jones , Lewis H. Vaden Jr. ppen Spaces Commission Dr. George Ray Partin Mrs. Roger Stone Mr. B. J. Meredith, Jr. Mr. Richard Sprouse Mr. Fred Jurgens' Mr. Michael Ritz Mr. Carl Wise Board of Elections Cecil Turnage Mrs. Meldrone William Fautz Board of Social Services Bennie L. Dunkum Mrs. Louise W. Williams William Ritchie Gordon Crumpler Clyde E. Hart J. Ruffin Apperson Library Board Elton R. Beverly Barbara Booker W. W. Gordon Robert L. Clark Constance Wood ~Richmond Metropolitan Authorit~ C. Porter Vaughan Edwin Brooks R. E. Equalization Board Finley R. Albright W. S. Carnes 'A. J. Goodwyn J. L. Longest Frank L. Holt School Board John W. Russel C. E. Curtis, Jr. Preston T. Holmes Ed Moseley Dr. George R. Partin ., e-30' 7~- JOSEPH $, JAMES AUDITOR aUDITOR OF PUBLIC ACCOUNTS P.O. Box i295 JOHN M. PURCELL,JR. RICH!~OND ~'3210 ASSISTANT December 20, 1971 Your Excellency: We have audited the accounts and records of DOUGLAS Wo MURPHEY, JUDGE of the JUVENILE AND DOMESTIC RELATIONS COURT and CHESTERFIELD COUNTY COURT for the fiscal year ended June 30, 1971, and present our report in the form of the statements immediately following this communication. The audit disclosed that full accounting had been made for all recorded receipts, and that the records had been prepared in an excellent manner. For informative purposes we present below a comparative tabulation of cases disposed of by the Courts for the three-year period ended June 30, 1971, as shown by the records: Types of Cases Year Ended June 30 1969 1970 1971 Civil 5,190 5,292 4,113 Criminal 15,877 14,546 13,646 Juvenile and domestic relation~ 2,228 674 665 Lunacy hearings 72 65 45 Total 23,367 20,577 18,469 The records disclosed that the following surety bonds were in effect: Principal D. W. Murphey, Judge William R. Shelton, Associate Judge John H. Thomas, Substitute Judge Richard M. Crump, Jr., Clerk Mrs. Lucille W. Jansch Mrs. Mary G. Blaquiere Mrs. ~mma Mo Hudson Miss Donna Grimes Miss Gloria R. Atkinson Mrs. Brenda H. Robinson Mrs. Rosa S. Cole Deputy Clerk Surety Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland ~mmu~t 4,000 '4,000 4,OOO 10,000 4,OOO 4,OOO 4,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 We acknowledge the cooperation extended to us during the course of the engagement. AUDITOR OF PUBLIC ACCOUNTS JMP:dbm dbm:7 - 2 - STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL CONDITION At June 30_~ 1971 Exhibit A ASSETS Cash on hand Cash on deposit with: The Bank of Virginia, Chester, Virginia Accounts receivable: Mary Ann Trueheart, J.P. Total $ 1,091.66 19,468.67 38°75 $20,599.08 Commonwealth of Virginia County of Chesterfield Clerk of the Court Collections for others Domestic relations cases Unclassified receipts Depository bonds LIABILITIES Subtotal (Exhibit' A-l) (Schedule 1) Total $ 4.50 30. O0 1.2.5 4.25 770.00 15.00 $ 825.00 _1_~9= 774~ 08 $20~599.08 Items STATt~ENT OF REVENUE RECEIPTS ,AND DISBURSEMENTS Year Ended Jane 3___~0:1971 Balance Disburse- July 1~ Receipts ments 1 9 7 0 Exhibit A,-1 Balance June 30~ 1971 Commonwealth of Virginia: Fines and forfeited recognizances Costs in criminal cases Confiscated money Liquidated damages I Commonwealth's attorney Fees County Courts Weighing Receipts for reportable violations - D.M.V. Game replacement Escheated funds (old out- standing checks) Total County of Chesterfield: Fines and forfeited recognizances $ Commonwealth's attorney Fees Sheriff and deputies County police Law library assessments Total ~_ Clerk of the Court: Fees in criminal cases ~_ Collections for others: Issuing justices $ Sheriffs' and other officers' fees for other localities Witnesses Total ~_ Domestic Relations Cases ~ Unclassified Receipts $ Total receipts, dis- bursements and balances $ a 11 6 70 Mary Ann Truehart - $178~600.77 $178,600o77 $ - - 935.00 93.5000 ~- - 1,267.00 1,267.00 - - 6~199.00 6~199.00 - 1,607.50 1,605.00 2°50 38,327.50 38~325.50 2.00 - 108.00 !08.00 - 43,450.00 43,4,50.00 2.00 2°00 '- 221.75 221075 - $ - $270,718.,52 $270~714,02 $ 4.50 $ 90,8,57,17 $ 90~832.17 $ 2,5,00 1.~607.50 1,605,00 2.,50 6,735.50 6,734.50 1o00 5~736o00 5,734°50 1.50 1,980o00 1 9~80~00 ~- 10~16o17. $106~886o17 ~ 30°00 ~&660_.._~00 ~8o75 _}_ 1,25 $ 29,966.50 $ 29,963.50 $ 3.00a 1,125o75 1~124,50 1~25b 3,80 3.80 - , $ 31~096o05 $ 31~091.80 ~__ 4,25 1~050.00 _~44,187.86 ~344~467,86 L770o00c 15.oo_$ - $ - 15 oo 1,065,00 $765,578°60 $765,818.60 $ 825,00 c 5 4 71 Docket #JoD.5594 GarieDonahay $250~00 6 23 '71 b 5 24 71 Sheriff of Henrico County Docket #JoD,9880 Claude Lunsford 520,00 Balance as above ~770o00 Date Docket Number D E P O S I T O R Y B 0 N D S At June 30~ 1971 Name Schedule 1 Amount 9 7 66 3 22 68 11 20 68 7 11 69 10 30 69 4 20 70 11 4 70 2 1 71 2 25 71 2 25 71 2 25 71 2 25 '71 3 1 71 3 3 71 3 25 71 3 30 71 3 30 71 4 7 71 4 7 71 4 13 71 4 16 71 4 16 7I 4 30 71 5 3 71 5 5 71 5 6 71 5 12 71 5 13 71 5 13 71 5 13 71 5 13 71 5 13 71 5 14 71 5 14 71 5 14 71 5 18 71 5 18 71 5 1,8 71 5 18 71 5 18 71 5 24 71 5 24 71 5 24 71 5 24 71 5 26 71 5 26 71 J.D.-4063 J.D.-3936 J.D.-5966 JoD.-9428 J.D.-5949 J.D.-9767 J.D.-9596 J.D.-10104 89958 89959 89960 89961 90968 J.D.-9863 JoD.-9136 92005 92004 92183 9737 92338 92458 92459 92185 92818 92902 92940 92448 93151 C-42300 93175 93176 C-42304 C-41985 92196 92050 93193 93194 93195 93228 93229 93367 93358 93359 92833 93443 93432 Clyde McCormick Edwin B. Agee Wilfred Conn Eddie Mason Carroll Lewis Edward L. Gravat, Jro William Harper William T. Wikins Jimmy Rufus Johnson Jimmy Rufus Johnson Jimmy Rufus Johnson Jimmy Rufus Johnson Leonard Thornton John Jones Samuel Turner, Jro James Alan Armentrout James Alan Armentrout Thomas George Kerr Alan Theodore Hartsae Brantley Victor Taylor Bainey Gray Goodson Colden Eugene Elswick Ed Higdon Charles Milton Rice James Cary Ralph Allen Tillman James Clinton Lewis Robert Sa Meyers Kenneth George Wolf, Jro Richard James Garrett Richard James Garrett Jason D. Ledbetter Willie Eo Twyman William Howard McCollum Daisy Bartley Adelia R. Onyedibia Adelia Ro Onyedibia Adelia Ro Onyedibia Robert Lee Harrington Alfred Edward Lavoie Eva Brown Watson John Jo Lee John Samuel Higgins John Randon Weeks, Sro William Lucas McFarland David Allen Valfer $ 500,00 500,00 500.00 1,654o58 500.00 500.O0 500.O0 500.00 500,00 500.00 500°00 500,00 100.00 500.00 500.00 200.00 500.00 300.00 300.00 300.00 100.00 100.00 200.00 39.00 500.00 300.00 450,00 500,00 300,00 26,75 2675 41,25 60 O0 400,00 100.00 27°75 27.7,5 27.75 41~ 75 41, o 75 39.75 86.75 47.75 50.00 150,00 17.75 Date Docket Number DEPOSITORY BONDS At June 30~ 1971 Name Schedule 1 ~a~e_! Amount 5 26 71 5 26 71 5 26 71 5 28 71 5 28 71 6 1 71 6 1 71 6 1 71 6 1 71 6 1 71 6 1 71 6 1 71 6 1 71 6 1 71 6 ~1 71 6 1 71 6 1 71 6 1 71 6 2 71 6 2 71 6 3 71 6 7 71 6 7 71 6 7 71 6 7 71 6 7 71 6 7 71 6 7 71 6 7 71 6 7 71 6 7 71 6 7 71 6 8 71 6 9 71 6 9 71 6 9 71 6 9 71 6 9 71 6 9 71 6 9 71 6 9 71 6 9 71 6 9 71 6 9 71 6 9 71 6 9 71 6 11 71 6 15 71 6 15 71 C-42430 C-42429 93442 93497 92662 C-42457 93561 93569 93559 93626 93627 93628 93632 93633 93634 93635 93636 93645 93644 90620 93288 93707 93712 93711 93710 93709 93722 93723 C-42529 93708 93719 C-42325 93739 93807 93793 C-42587 93689 93802 93801 93800 93803 93805 93804 93806 93808 C-42590 JoD.-10711 93852 93939 Ellen C. Sayers Melvin Do Burleigh William Ho Gebhart Joseph H. Simmons James Franklin Wells James Marvin Schenck Cecil Edwin Bransuum Lewis Nichols Torain Joe Walker Broadus Johnnie Lee Currie Tommy Pringle Melvin Leroy Edwards Charles R. Harris Francis Gardner Rossell Joseph Henry Unverdorben Alvin Lee Smalls Obia Harper Charles B. Montgomery John Ellis Montgomery Donald J~ Barrett Larry Dean Carter Thomas R. Hartmann Woodrow Wo Williams Arthur Green Charles Winston Catty Hugh Dan Morrison, Jro Yvonne Ellis George Robulack Kenneth Burl Nichols, Sr. Panl Eugene Holloway Karla Beatrice Semler Winfred Watlington Page R. Gregory Jerome iL. Richards Samuel B. Bowen Raine J, Edwards Vaughn Michael Bright Arthur E0 Gantz Nicholas Mo Scotto Sally Ann Walker Lester Bullock Anna Pearl Leesberg Curtis Lo George Lester Hicks, Jr, Carolyn Yvonne Howard Larry So Beanfield David W. Magee Frances Hollis Haney Lewis George Beutucelli 57~25 57°25 16 25 250 O0 100 O0 300 00 41 75 39 75 35. 75 33° 75 41o 75 50000 41o75 33° 75 33° 75 61~ 75 33~75 33~ 75 33~ 75 50° 00 115o O0 31o 75 32° 75 37~ 75 37° 75 26° 75 33,75 33~75 150o00 41~ 75 47.75 50.00 150~00 50~00 150~00 29° 25 27° 75 31o75 33~ 75 61o75 33° 75 37°75 41o 75 33~ 75 31o 75 23° 25 25° 00 250° 00 16o 25 D E P O S I T O R Y B O N D S Schedule 1 At June 30, 1971 Page 3 Docket Date Number Name Amount 6 15 71 6 15 71 6 15 71 6 15 71 6 15 71 6 15 71 6 15 71 6 15 71 6 15 71 6 15 71 6 15 71 6 15 71 6 15 71 6 15 71 6 15 71 6 16 71 6 16 71 6 17 71 6 20 71 6 21 71 6 22 71 6 22 71 6 22 71 6 22 71 6 22 71 6 22 71 6 22 71 6 22 71 6 23 71 6 23 71 6 23 71 6 23 71 6 23 71 6 23 71 6 23 71 6 23 71 6 23 71 6 23 71 6 23 71 6 24 71 6 25 71 6 25 71 6 25 71 6 28 71 6 29 71 6 29 71 93941 93940 93936 93937 93938 93942 93943 C-42631 93944 93945 93946 93947 93948 93949 93950 93951 93952 93953 93853 93009 94026 C-42697 C-42612 94094 94095 C-42636 94096 94097 J.D.-10460 94024 94137 94138 94045 94145 94146 94148 94149 C-42712 94150 94151 C-42692 92155 C-42754 94250 C-42716 C-42794 C-42196 John Henery McIntyre David Eugene Helms Mance Hardy, Jr. Charles Lacy Council Thomas Joseph Kirk Henry Thomas Smith, Jro Henry Thomas Smith, Jro Tom Lofton Thomas Abbott Littleton James Wilson Robert Watkins Youngblood Ruth Ann Hall Shirley Elizabeth Siebern Thomas Adams John William Adams Eugene David Maldonate Carmine Vitello Richard J. Williams Donnie Wayne Wolfrey Nicholas Chris Doukas Jessie Acrey Doyle M. Moore Powell D. Hinton Emery Loyd Kimball John P. Schlacter Ralph L. Ewell Samuel Dean Tullos Robert G. Johnston Charles Bruce Mollie H. Yates Bobby Holbert Burton Wo Clifton James L. Mebone Arthur J. Marion Arlette S. Tillman Donald L. Bieber Franklin Ro Williams R~ B. Dalton Franklin R. Williams Kenneth Marshall Cole Dennis Eo Aldridge Charles L. Knott, Jro Kenneth Go Wolf, Jr° Douglas Hilton, Jr° Marvin Atkins Alan Ao Gross Victor Broaddus Matthews, Jr° $ 62°75 16o 25 112.75 33,75 33~75 26° 75 26~75 24~ 25 33°75 33°75 33°75 33°75 31o75 86° 75 150,00 31.75 41,75 47°00 500. O0 50.00 100o00 50. O0 50° O0 41,75 33 75 33.25 27 75 27 75 25,00 300, O0 31 75 43 75 62 75 37 75 37 75 31,75 37 75 38 75 100 ~ 00 32 75 50,00 50 ~ 00 300 00 50.00 100o O0 50~ O0 50°00 Total $19,774o08 JOHN M. PURCI;'LL. JR, A~;$1$TANT oYlMONy/EALTI+ AUDITOR OF PUBLIC ACCOUNTS P. O. BOX ~1295 RICHMOND, VIRGINIA 23210 January 19, 1972 Board of Supervisors County of Chesterfield Chesterfield, Virginia 23832 Gentlemen: Daniel A. Robinson & Associates, Certified Public Accountants, Charlottesville, have forwarded to us copies of the report on audit of the accounts and records of the COUNTY OF CMESTERFIELD and GEORGE W. MOORE~ JR.~ TREASURER for the fiscal year ended June 30, 1971. Our~review Of the report indicates that it has been prepared in accord- ance with the specifications furnished by the Auditor of Public Accounts, and the report is therefore accepted by this office. JSJ:ap Very truly yours cc: Daniel A. Robinson & Associates SAFE DRIVING SAVES LIVES VIRGINIA: At a special meeting of the Chesterfield County School Board held at noon Yanuary S, 1972, in the School Administration Building, Chesterfield, Virginia PRESENT: Mr. Z. W. Russell, Chairman Mr. P. T. Holmes, Vice-chairman ]~Zr. C. E. Curtis, Yr. Dr. G. R. Partin Mr. E. A. Moseley, Yr. On motion of Mr. Holmes, the school board directed that the board of supervisors be respectfully requested to approve effective February 1, 1972, the school board's offering of statements of intent to employ current teachers and a maximum of 120 teachers new to the system as possible replacement teachers for the 1972-73 school session. The current salary schedule will be stated with the understanding that such salary will be adjusted in contracts in the event that scale increases are approved in the budget for 1972-73. A copy: teste- Robert A. Lwx, Clerk JOHN TYLER COMMUNITY COLLEGE, Chester, Virginia 23831, Telephone 703/748-2221 IIII January 5, 19 72 Mr. Melvin W. Burnette Executive Secretary County of Chesterfield Chesterfield Courthouse, Virginia 23832 Dear Mel: I write to ask that you bring to the attention of the Board of Supervisors that the term of Mr. T. W. Fisher as a member of the John Tyler Community College Board expired on June 30, 1971, and that a consequent need exists to fill this Chesterfield County position on the latter Board. A most valuable member of our Board, Mr. Fisher has continued to serve in the interim and is eligible for reappointment. Permit me also to take this opportunity to thank you and the Board of Supervisors for your continued support, and to express our pride in the 500 Chesterfield County students who enrolled at John Tyler this fall. I attach copies of the Virginia Community College System's annual report for the past academic year and of a summary sheet regarding John Tyler's current status, and would be happy to provide additional information and/or to meet with the Board of Supervisors at its convenience to discuss the college and its future. Sincerely, R. Walpole / /President of the College, and l/Secretary to the Board JRW/mj s Attachments - 2 Supported by the Commonwealth of Virginia; Cities of Colonial Heights, Hopewell, Petersburg; Counties of Amelia, Charles City, Chesterfield, Dinwiddie, Prince George, Surry, Sussex. CATEGORIES FOR COMMUNITY COLLEGE BOARD MEMBERSHIP Air Conditioning and Heating Agriculture Allied Health Aluminum A r chite ct Associations - Trade Associations - Public Service Automobile Industry Beverages Broadcasting Se rvice Building Materials Business Service Chemical Industry Clothing Industry Coal Industry Communication Service Construction Service Dentistry Dry Goods and General Merchandise Education Electrical Industry and Electronics Engineering Entertainment Finance Firearms and Explosives Fire Fighting and Prevention Food Industry Funeral Furniture and Home Furnishings Gas Industry Glass Industry Gore rnment Hardware Homemaking Ho rticulture Hotels, Resorts and Restaurants Institutions and Hospitals Insurance Iron and Steel Industry Jewelry Laundry, Cleaning and Dyeing Law Law Enfor cement Machinery and Equipment Meat, Dairy, Poultry and Fish Products Medicine Metal, Mining and Refining Mineral Oil Industry Musical Instruments and Merchandise Office Appliances, Equipment and Stationery Optical Goods and Services Osteopathy Paint, Oils and Decoration Paper Industry Pharmacy Photography Plastics Industry Plumbing Power Production Equipment and Supplies Printing and Publishing Public Relations and Advertising Pure Science Real Estate Re creation Refrigeration Religion Rubber Industry Ships and Nautical Equipment Stone Industry Storage Textile Fibers Tobacco Industry T r an s po rtation Vehicle Industry V~erlnary Medicine Wood Industry State Board for Community Colleges Effective 1-1- 72 JOHN TYLER COM~CONITY COLLEGE General .... as one of Virginia's system of comprehensive community colleges, John Tyler offers a spectrum of programs ranging from traditional junior college (i.e., "transfer") curricula in the arts and sciences to preparatory "developmental" offerings in basic verbal and mathematical skills, and emphasizing the job-oriented "occupational-technical" programs in which about two-thirds of its 2,000 students are enrolled. Most programs are two years long and lead to an associate degree; other, shorter programs lead to certificates. Admission to the College is generally open to all who are high school graduates or are at least 18 years old, and who are able to benefit from a program of instruction; admission to a given pro~ram requires meeting qualifications necessary to success in that program. Located near Chester, 13 miles south of Richmond, the College has as its primary service area the cities of Colonial Heights, Hopewell, and Petersburg; the counties of Amelia, Charles City, Chesterfield, Dinwiddie, Prince George, Surry and Sussex; and that portion of Richmond lying south of the James River. There are no dormitories; all students commute. Classes are conducted during weekdays from 8:00 a.m, to 10:30 p.m. and on Saturday morning. History .... in early 1965, an application by cities and counties in the region for establishment of a technical college was approved. Facilities suitable for that limited purpose were designed for an estimated enrollment of the equivalent (i.e., F_ull T_ime ~quivalent, or "F.T.E.") of 600 full-time students. Construction was began in June, 1966, on land donated by Mr. Harold T. Goyne, Sr. Shortly thereafter, the purposes of the College were expanded by the General Assembly to include "transfer" and adult education programs, and what was to have been a technical college became a comprehensive community college. On October 2, 1967, John Tyler opened with 1231 (or an F.T.E. of about 900 students0 Full accreditation was achieved in 1969, the minimum possible time. F~ll 1971 saw 2015 students (an F4~.E. of about 1450) enrolled in 2~programs, of which 18 are occupational-techni,cal. Students... 98% are Virginia residents, and approximately 75% are from the primary service area; 2 of 3 are in occupational programs; 1 in 3 is female; 1 in 4 is a veteran; 1 in . 5 is black; ages range from the teens to the seventies, Focused on career goals, they want to .learn and are serious about it. Faculty.. .... the 80 teaching.faculty average 39 years of age; 2 of 3 are male; 1 in 10 is black. Those teaching ~raditional academic subjects average 8 years' teaching experience and hold masters or doctoral degrees; those teaching occupational-technical subjects average 8 years' experience in those occupations, plus 6 years' teaching experience, and over half hold masters or doctoral degrees. Free from research and' publication pressures, they like to teach and are good at it. Direction .... the College operates under broad direction of the Chancellor of the Virginia Community College System, within policies set by the State Board for Community Colleges, and with active guidance and support from the College's own Board, to which members are appointed by the cities and counties of its service area. Internally, the emphasis is shifting from promotion to management. Thus, major energies are now being directed toward increasing accountability and return on investment by improved use of facilities, greater and more direct contact with current and potential employers of graduates, development of more useful evaluative techniques with respect to faculty and programs, cooperative ventures with other colleges, and rigorous planning for the future. Facilities... built in 1966-67 to serve 600 F.T.E. students in a technical college, current facilities are inadequate for the 1450 F.T.E. students now enrolled in the diversified curricula of a comprehensive community college, and enrollment pressures continue. Appropriate capital funds have been included in our 1972-74 budget, requests to meet these needs. A COPY, TESTE: MACK T. DANIELS, Clezk MACK T. DANIELS CLERK COMMONWEALTH ATTORNEY CIRCUIT COURT CH ESTERFIELD, VIRGI January 4, 1972 Mr. M. W. Burnett Executive Secretary County of Chesterfield Chesterfield, Virginia Dear Mel: ERNEST P. GATeS JUDGE DAVID MEADE WHITE JUDGE I am enclosing a certified copy of an order entered by Judge Gates relative to the Continental Can Company to Chesterfield County transaction. In addition to the fee allowed for the examination of this title, we have applied for title insurance which premium will be $342.10. There is also $9 due toward recordation costs for recording the deed. I would appreciate it if you would present these to the Board for payment. The total payment would be $9 O.lO. Very truly y. ours, Commonwealth s Attorney bhg Enclosure ORGANIZATION SIGNATURE DATE REGULATIOI S FOR TI-IE USE OF RIDING RIItGS, TRACK AND BUILDINGS E'ffective January 1, 1972 all persons and associations desiring to use buildings, grounds and other facilities located at Chesterfield Courthouse for the purpose of a horse show or race will be required to place on deposit a fee of seventy-five dollars ($75.00) prior to the beginning of any event. This fee will cover the use of rings, track, stables and electricity. Thirty-three per cent (33%) of the seventy-five ~ollars ($75.00) deposit will be refunded at the end of all scheduled events provided that all keys, locks and any other property of the County of Chesterfield have been returned to Mr. C'.G. Manuel, Director of General Services. Future use and total thi~rty-three percent (33%) refund will be contingent upon the satJs£actory cleaning of all facilities used including all restrooms and disposal of all waste from stables in a designated area. The County will furnish waste receptacles f~r all paper ~nd other litter collected. All facilities will be ~nspected before and after all events A copy of these regulations must be signed and returned with the necessary deposit before any events can be staged. The duplicate copy is for your records. NAbIE ORGANIZATION SIGNATURE DATE