Loading...
72-25cs1) 3) A) C) D) E) F) *For office u onl , .... ~ .-~ Y 'CAS '92- *REVIEW BY P. C. AMENDmeNT TO THE ZONING ORDINA~CE T_he followin$ information is to be typed or printed NAME OF APPLICANT: 7-/,,~- TELEPHONE NO.: NA~ OF PRESENT OWNER 0F PROPERTY ON WHICH THIS ~Q~ST WILL IF THE APPLICANT IS NOT THE OWNER OF THE PROPERTY IN QUESTION, EXPLAIN: (Copy of pending contract or option agreement shall be attached hereto and made a part of this application.) LOCATION OF PROPERTY IN QUESTION (Following information to be obtained by the applicant from the Office of the County Assessor) A) MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT ~/~/,~ B) TAX MAP NO.. C) SEC, NO. D) SUBDIVISION NO. E) BLOCK NO. F) LOT OR PARCEL NO. ~ G) STREET ADDRESS · A PLAT OF THIS PROPERTY SHALL BE ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART OF THIS APPLICATION SHOWING THE FOLLOWING: LOCATION BY REFERENCE TO NEAREST ROAD INTERSECTION DIMENSIONS OF SITE (PAGE 1) 4) 5) 6) THE PETITIONER REQUESTS THAT THE ZONING ORDINANCE BE AMENDED TO RECLASSIFY THIS PROPERTY FROM , NO./N/~E NO./NAME STATE THE REASON FOR THIS REQUEST: STATE HOW THIS REQUEST WILL NOT BE MATERIALLY DETRIMENTAL TO THE ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS OR THE SURROUNDINO NEIGHBORHOOD: . ~-/,.,~ ,~ /,--,~.-/:~ ~,.~./,~...~,.,~/,~ ~_..~ ,~.~- ?) STATE ANY EXISTING USE PERMIT OR VARIANCE GRANTED PREVIOUSLY ON THE PARCEL IN QUESTION: 8) EXISTING LAND USE: (PAGE 2) 9) GIVE NAMES OF ALL OWNERS ADJACENT, ACROSS THE ROAD OR HIGHWAY AND FACING THE PROPERTY AND ANY OWNERS ACROSS ANY RAILROAD RIGHT OF WAY FROM SUCH PROPERTY. IN THE EVENT'THE PROPERTY AFFECTED IS SITUATED AT OR WITHIN 100 FEET ON THE INTERSECTION OF ANY TWO OR MORE ROADS OR HIGHWAYS, AT OR WITHIN ONE HUNDRED FEET OF THE INTERSECTION OF ANY ROAD OR HIGHWAY WITH A RAILROAD RIGHT- OF-WAY OR AT OR WITHIN ONE HUNDRED FEET OF THE INTERSECTION OF .-.THE RIGHTS-OF-WAY OF ANY TWO RAILROADS, GIVE NAMES OF PROPERTY OWNERS AT ALL CORNERS OF ANY SUCH INTERSECTION. A) PROPERTY OWNER' S NAME: ~A~'~ ~o~ss,:/~z / ~~/~ ~Ax ~ ~o. ~,~~/~W~. ~o.: s~o~s~o~ ~o.: BLOCK NO.: LOT OR PARCEL NO.: B) C) D) MAILING ADDRESS: TAX MAP NO. , ,, C, NO.: S~DIVISIO~ NO.: BLOCK NO.: LOT OR PARCEL NO.: ,,/~ ............. BLOCK NO.: LOT OR PARCEL NO.: MAILING ADDRESS: . , · ~x ~ ~o.//¢-I~ ~. ~o.: ~ws~o~ ~o.: B~CK NO.: LQT OR PAECEL NO,: .,~ ........... (PAGE 3) E) TAX MAP NO.: .... C. NO.: SUBDIVISION NO.: BLOCK NO.: LOT OR PARCEL NO.: / · ~x ~ ~o.:/t7-I~. ~o.: s~~o~ ~o.: ~oc~ ~o.:.., ~o~ o~ ~A~C~ ~o.:,, /-I, ~AILING ADDRESS: TAX MAP NO.//~'t~EC. NO.: SUBDIVISION NO.: BLOCK NO.: , ~ , LOT OR PARCEL NO.: 3 BLOCK NO.: LOT OR PARCEL NO.: ~ / I) J) PROPERTY OWNER'S NAME: MAILING ADDRESS: TAX MAP NO.: BLOCK NO.: SEC. NO.:_ SUBDIVISION NO.: LOT OR PARCEL NO.: PROPERTY OWNER'S NAME: MAILING ADDRESS: TAX MAP NO.: BLOCK NO.: SEC. NO.: SUBDIVISION NO.: LOT OR PARCEL NO.: (PAGE 4) lO) / THE APPLICANT HEREWITH DEPOSITS THE SUM OF TWENTY DOLLARS ($20.00) ATTACHED TO THIS APPLICATION, TO PAY THE COST OF ADVERTISING NOTICE OF THE HEARING OF SAID BOARD TO ACT ON THIS REQUEST. CHECK OR MONEY ORDER MUST BE MADE PAYABLE TO: TREASU~ER~ COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD, I/WE HEREBY DEPOSE AND SAY THAT ALL OF THE ABOVE STATEMENTS AND THE STATEMENTS CONTAINED IN ANY EXHIBITS TRANSMITTED ARE TRUE. SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT (Same name as used in item l-A, page 1.) SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS..~<P DAvY OF o~ 19 7/. NCFfARY (PAGE 5) P. O. BOX 3513 RICHMOND, VIRGINIA 23234 - Ph. (7'03) 748-4272 TO THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CHESTERFIELD COUNTY: IN THE MATTER OF: 72-25CS Request of H & E Corporation to rezone 8 acres of land ~fronting 431.62 feet on West Hundred Road and 289.15' feet on Branders Bridge Road, from A to C-2 SUMMARY OF ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS' OPPOSITION The undersigned adjacent property owners have previously expressed their opposition to the requested rezoning by Petition to the Planning Commission and by appearance before the Planning Commission on January 18, 1972. On.~that date, after detailed examination of the applicant wi~h respect to ~e'proposed use of the land, and after hearing opposition of ALL adjacent land owners, as expressed by one of them, Thomas J. Sadler, Jr., as their spokesman, the Planning Commission unanimously denied the requested recommendation for rezoning. The basis for the opposition of the adjacent land owners is summarized as follows: (1) The property is surrounded by residences on every side, where resident-owners and taxpayers of long-standing have for many years enjoyed the atmosphere of a quiet rural neighborhood. Immediately to the north -- across Route l0 -- is the home of Mr. and Mrs. Thomas J. Sadler, Jr.; to the south are the homes of Mr. and Mrs. E' C. Pastorfield, Mr. and Mrs. Ira Hepburn, Jr., and Mrs. Virginia C. Hepburn; to the west -- across Branders Bridge Road -- is the home of Mr. and Mrs. J. L. Eyler; and to the east are the homes of Mrs. Meta D. Terrell and Mr. and Mrs. R. L. Turner. The photographs attached, marked "Exhibit of Adjacent Property Owners," depict the type of neighborhood as it now exists.' (2) ~he proposed use of the land would adversely affect the health, safety and welfare of the adjacent property owners by exposing them to noise, increased traffic congestion, unaccustomed commotion, pollution, a.nd apprehension of danger to themselves and their children,~ (3) The proposed use of the land would impair the character of the adjacent land, would be incompatible with the present zoning and would create an unsightly and unattractive view. (4) The proposed use of the land would be likely to substantially reduce and impair the value of the adjacent properties for residential use.~ The adjacent property owners have studied the Zoning Ordinance of the County, and understand by Section 17-24 that "... whenever the Board of Supervisors is authorized under the provisions of this chapter to grant a use permit, then such standards and regulations as are set forth for granting or denying use permits by the Board af Zoning Appeals in Section 17-20 shall apply to the Board of Supervisors in determining whether a use permit shall or shall not be granted." We call your attention to Section 17-20, in particular the following: "In consi~ering an application for a use permit, The Board s~all give due regard to the ~ature and condition of all adjacent uses and structmres, and the probable effect upon them of the proposed use." We respectfully request the Board of Supervisors to allow us to continue the enjoyment of our homes, and to deny the requested rezoning'" WITNESS the following signatures and seals on this day of February, 197~2. ~ STATE OF VIRGINIA COUNTY OF CHF~TER~IELD, -~-~_~ ~ ,.':: therein.' Chester, Virginia .lammry '!2, 1972 Chesterfield County Planning Commission Chesterfield, Virginia Gentlemen: We are concerned citizens of the area of Chesterfield County near the property at the intersection of Brande~s Bridge Road and Route 10, which we understand you have been requested to rezone from A - Agricultural to C-2 - General Business. We call your attuntion to the fact that the property under consideration is surrounded by residences in a very quiet neighborhood, where a number of senior citizens have lived for years. We do not feel it would be right to deprive our senior citizens of their enjoyment of quiet living. The uses which would be permitted by C-2 zoning would have the effect of putting a big, noisy factory in their side yards. Their nerves and their general health would suffer. / There is a school nearby and there are children in the neigh- borhood, too, whose safety would be jeopardized. Some of us are within easy hearing distance; some of us are in sight of the property; some of us pass it going to and from work -- to all of us it seems unreasonable that such location could even be suggested for general business. It would be an eye-sore at a spot which is approximately mid-way between Chester and the Courthouse; it could create traffic problems, health problems, and endanger the safety and welfare of our senior citizens and our children. Please give this matter your careful consideration and protect ,, the rights of our neighbors by refusing to rezone the property. Very tr y yours, ~ ~., , . (This ts a legally binding contract; if not understood, seek competent advice) ., This CONTRACT OF~ PURCHASE~. made in triplicate as of "~.L~. N~ ·, . , 191~ ~k, provides that Puwha.r~gre,s to buy throu%h Realtor, as agent for Seller, and *!1;; a~ees to .Il the folio;tug de.~d ~1--.tee 2;'~; ~mvem~m;~eo~.l~ated in the County or Cie'/ of _.. ¢--~~%~ .~ ~ ~ , Virtinia (all herein ~lled '~ pro~rty'3: VIRGINIA ASSOCIATION OF 'REALTORS -~ REAL ESTATE PURCHASE CONTRACT ' ~,, - and more commonly known as ~a, ~. ~ ~.,.,.~t~.,, ~ ~ ¥(&"~c., ~!la~ ($~), and such purchase price shall be paid as follows: - ' - 2. If either F.H.A. or V.A. financing is involved in this transaction, one of the paragraphs on the reverse hereof shall be a part of this COn. tract of Purchase if such paragraph has been executed by both Purchaser and Seller. 3. P~]rchaser has made a depoait o~,~z_'~,,~,,a~,~_.,,,=':':':':':':':':~ ~ ,,'"~_'~ ~n, ~,.~ Dollars ($ with Realtor, receipt of which is hereby a~cknowled~ed~-a~d such d-cpo~it'shall be held by Rcalto~ in escrow until the date of settlement and thenappliec~ ~o the purchase price, or returned to Purchaser if the title to the preperty is not marketable. 4. Selier agrees to convey thc property to Purchaser by General Warranty De¢¢ with the usual English covcnams of title and free and clear tr0m all enc.umbranees, tenancies, liens (for taxes or otherwise), except as may be otherwise provided above, but subject to applicable restrictive covenan~s':of re, cord: Seller further agrees to deliver possession of the property, to Purchaser on the date of settlement and to pay the expenae of preparing the deed of bargain and sale and the recordation tax applicable to grantors. 5. Settlement shall be made at the offices of Realtor or at_~N,~ n. ~ ~ (-'~ n,~.,_~:~___._._._._._._._~ on or before , or.as soon thereafter as title can be examined and necessary documents prepared, with allow- ance o! a reasom}ble time for Seller to correct any defects reported by the title examiner. 6. All taxes, interest, rent, and F.H.A. or similar escrow deposits, if any, shall be prorated as of the date of settlement. 7. All risk of loss or damage to the property by fire, windstorm, casualty, or other cause is assumed b~ Seller until the date of settlement. . 8. Purchaser and Seller agree that Realtor was the sole procuring cause of this Contract of Purchase. and Seller agrees to pay Realtor for servicea rendered a cash fee of ~- per cent of the purchase price. If either Purchaser or Seller de{gules under thi~ Contract of Sale. such defaulting party shall be liable for the cash fee of Realtor and any expenses incurred by the non-defaulting party, including attorneys' fees, in connection with this transaction and the enforcement of such Contract. 9. Purchaser represents fhal an inspection satisfactory to Purchaser has been made of the property, and Purchaser agrees'to accept the property in its present condition except as may be otherwise provided in the description of the property above. 10. This Contrail of Purchase constitutes the entire agreement among the parties and may not be mcdified or changed except by written instrument executed by all of the parties, including Realtor. I1'~ This Contract of Purchase shall be construed, interpreted, and applied according to the law of the State of Virginia.and shall be binding upon and shall inure to the benefit of the heirs, personal representatives, successors, and assigns of the parties. WITNESS the foll.~wmg signatures and seals: '" Seller ., ...... ..: ............. (SEAL) Seller ~ (SEAL) Realtor (SEAL) Purchaser Deposit Ree'd $\C~C2~, ~ Check / Cash Sales Agent: The foregoing form may only be used by members in good standing of the ¥irginia Association of Realtors. Expressly prohibited are tl~ duplication or reproduction of such form, or the use of the name "Virginia Association of Realtors" m connection with an~ ~ntten form, without the written consent of the Virginia Association of Realtors. Form VAR-600 Rev. ': ~