2015-08-26 MinutesBOARD OF SUPERVISORS
MINUTES
August 26, 2015
Supervisors in Attendance: Staff in Attendance:
Mr. Stephen A. Elswick, Chairman Mr. Greg Akers, Dir.,
Mr. Arthur S. Warren, Vice Chrm. Internal Audit
Ms. Dorothy A. Jaeckle Dr. Sheryl Bailey, Dep.
Mr. James M. Holland County Administrator,
Mr. Daniel A. Gecker Management Services
Mr. Michael Bacile, Dir.,
Purchasing
Mr. James J. L. Stegmaier Ms. Janice Blakley,
County Administrator Clerk to the Board
Ms. Patsy Brown, Dir.,
Accounting
Ms. Debbie Burcham,
Exec. Dir., Community
Services Board
Mr. Allan Carmody, Dir.,
Budget and Management
Ms. Jana Carter, Dir.,
Juvenile Services
Mr. Richard Cordle,
Treasurer
Ms. Mary Ann Curtin, Dir.,
Intergovtl. Relations
Mr. Jonathan Davis, Dir.,
Real Estate Assessment
Mr. William Dupler, Dep.
County Administrator,
Community Development
Mr. Michael Golden, Dir.,
Parks and Recreation
Mr. Joe Horbal,
Commissioner of the Revenue
Mr. John W. Harmon,
Real Property Manager
Mr. Garrett Hart, Dir.,
Economic Development
Mr. George Hayes, Dir.,
Utilities Department
Mr. Rob Key, Director,
General Services
Mr. Louis Lassiter, Asst.
County Administrator
Mr. Mike Mabe, Dir.,
Library
Mr. Jeffrey L. Mincks,
County Attorney
Ms. Mary Martin Selby, Dir.,
Human Resource Services
Chief Loy Senter,
Fire and EMS
Ms. Marsha Sharpe, Dir.,
Social Services
Mr. Scott Smedley, Dir.,
Environmental Engineering
15-954
08/26/15
Mr. Warren encouraged Dr. Raspiller to give the educational
presentation to the Richmond Regional Planning District
Commission, the Crater Planning District Commission and the
Greater Richmond Partnership.
In response to Mr. Warren's question, Dr. Raspiller stated
students who have transferred to a four-year college and
successfully been placed in an entry-level job return to
share their experiences with undergraduates. He further
stated employers often visit with undergraduates in order to
expand career opportunities and offer tips to enhance their
resume.
In response to Mr. Elswick's question, Dr. Raspiller stated
the presentation will be made at the peer consortium meeting
for John Tyler Community College in the fall, as well as for
the Superintendent of Chesterfield County Public Schools.
2.C.
REPORT ON PROPOSED TRANSFER OF SCHOOLS CONSTRUCTION
PROCUREMENT RESPONSIBILITIES TO COUNTY PURCHASING
DEPARTMENT
Mr. Stegmaier stated the Board set September 16, 2015, for a
public hearing to consider an amendment to County Code
related to New Construction Procurement for Chesterfield
County Schools. He further stated at the time the Board set
the public hearing, they asked staff to prepare a report on
the transfer of procurement responsibilities to the county
purchasing department. He stated county staff worked with
school staff to prepare the report and it has been included
in the agenda packet. He noted no action is required on this
item until after the public hearing on September 16tH
3. BOARD MEMBER REPORTS
Mr. Holland announced he gave welcoming remarks at the
successful CCPL Job Fair at Meadowdale Library on August 19th
He stressed the importance of maintaining an employee within
the county's Economic Development Department whose primary
focus is small business relations. He also announced he
visited 10-15 neighborhoods for National Night Out on August
4th. In regards to county bonds that were sold at an overall
interest rate of 2.46 percent, he stated the economy proves
to be very balanced.
In response to Mr. Holland's comments, Mr. Gecker stated
during the recession, instead of drawing from reserves, staff
was asked to change the policy with regard to reserves from
7.5 to 8 percent. He further stated the county's ability to
handle itself in the post -recessionary period was one of the
reasons Standard and Poor's was able to say the county could
handle credit stresses better than the federal government.
15-957
08/26/15
4. REQUESTS TO POSTPONE AGENDA ITEMS AND ADDITIONS,
DELETIONS OR CHANGES IN THE ORDER OF PRESENTATTnM
On motion of Mr. Warren, seconded by Mr. Holland, the Board
replaced Item 8.B.9., Approval of Lease Purchase Agreement
with Banc of America for the Financing of One Hundred School
Buses.
Ayes: Elswick, Warren, Jaeckle, Holland and Gecker.
Nays: None.
5. RESOLUTIONS AND SPECIAL RECOGNITIONS
5.A. RECOGNIZING THE 2015 NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF COUNTIES
(NACO) AND VIRGINIA ASSOCIATION OF COUNTIES (VACO)
ACHIEVEMENT AWARD WINNERS
Mr. Lassiter stated Chesterfield County is the recipient of
11 Achievement Awards from the National Association of
Counties (NACo) this year for innovative programs and
services. The following recipients were recognized by Mr.
Elswick and Mr. Stegmaier, and department representatives
were presented with the 2015 NACo Achievement Awards:
DEPARTMENT PROJECT
Accounting Open Government Webpage
Adolescent Reporting Program Adolescent Reporting
Program Community
Service
Community Corrections Services Center of Risk
Reduction
Economic Development Sports Tourism
Support to Business
Juvenile Detention Viewing Behavior
Through a Different
Lens: Trauma Informed
Care in Detention
Libraries Community Demographics
and Engagement in
Libraries
STEM Learning with a
Library Robotics Team
MH/MR and Learning and Performance Mental Health First
Aid and Applied Suicide
Intervention Skills
Training for County
Employees
15-958
08/26/15
Police
Utilities
Free Ride Home
Position Readiness
Education Program
(PREP)
Optimizing Performance
Measures to Enhance Ou
Business Practices and
Maintain Excellent
Customer Service
Mr. Dean Lynch, Deputy Executive Director for VACo, presented
the VACo Achievement Award for Created Equal: Engaging the
Community Through Conversation to Library representatives.
Mr. Stegmaier, Mr. Elswick and Mr. Holland congratulated and
highly praised each department on their prestigious
recognitions.
Mr. Mike Mabe and Library representatives expressed their
appreciation for the special recognition.
6. WORK SESSIONS
There were no Work Sessions at this time.
7. DEFERRED ITEMS
There were no Deferred Items at this time.
8. NEW BUSINESS
8.A. APPOINTMENTS
On motion of Ms. Jaeckle, seconded by Mr. Gecker, the Board
suspended its rules to allow simultaneous nomination
/appointment/ reappointment of members to the Lower Magnolia
Green Community Development Authority Board, the Youth
Services Citizen Board, the Community Services Board and the
GRTC Board of Directors.
Ayes:
Nays:
8.A.1.
Elswick, Warren, Jaeckle, Holland and Gecker.
None.
LOWER MAGNOLIA GREEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
BOARD
On motion of Mr. Elswick, seconded by Ms. Jaeckle, the Board
simultaneously nominated/reappointed Mr. Mark Wauford, Ms.
Bethany Miller, Ms. Debra Girvin, Mr. Art Heinz and Mr.
Robert Bullock to serve as members on the Lower Magnolia
Green Community Development Authority Board, whose terms are
effective on September 1, 2015, and will expire on August 31,
2019.
Ayes: Elswick, Warren, Jaeckle, Holland and Gecker.
Nays: None.
15-959
08/26/15
9
9
8.A.2. YOUTH SERVICES CITIZEN BOARD
On motion of Mr. Holland, seconded by Mr. Warren, the Board
simultaneously nominated/appointed/reappointed the following
members to the Youth Services Citizen Board, whose terms are
effective on September 1, 2015, and will expire on June 30,
2016:
Name District
Ms. Sydney Means Dale
Mr. Drew Birchmeir Matoaca
Ms. Aaliyah McLean Matoaca
Ms. Natacha Rangel-Ribeiro Midlothian
Ayes: Elswick, Warren, Jaeckle, Holland and Gecker.
Nays: None.
8.A.3. COMMUNITY SERVICES BOARD
On motion of Ms. Jaeckle, seconded by Mr. Warren, the Board
simultaneously nominated/appointed Ms. Jennifer Davis to
serve as a member on the Community Services Board, whose term
is effective immediately and will expire on December 31,
2017.
Ayes: Elswick, Warren, Jaeckle, Holland and Gecker.
Nays: None.
8.A.4. GRTC BOARD OF DIRECTORS
On motion of Mr. Holland, seconded by Mr. Warren, the Board
simultaneously nominated/reappointed Mr. Daniel K. Smith, Mr.
David Matthews and Mr. Gary Armstrong, to serve on the GRTC
Board of Directors for a one-year term effective October 10,
2015 and expiring October 9, 2016.
And, further, the Board authorized the County Administrator
or his designee to appear at the annual meeting and vote on
behalf of the county for the GRTC Directors appointed by the
Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors and by the Richmond
City Council.
Ayes: Elswick, Warren, Jaeckle, Holland and Gecker.
Nays: None.
8.B. CONSENT ITEMS
8.B.1. ADOPTION OF RESOLUTIONS
8.B.l.a. RECOGNIZING THE E. I. DU PONT DE NEMOURS AND
COMPANY AS THEY CELEBRATE THE 5 OTHANNIVERSARY OF
THE INVENTION OF KEVLAR®
II On motion of Mr. Warren, seconded by Mr. Jaeckle, the Board
adopted the following resolution:
WHEREAS, DuPont's Spruance Plant has been a part of the
Chesterfield County community for more than 80 years,
supporting programs such as "Girls in Science," "First
Virginia Robotics" and "Rebuilding Together"; and
15-960
08/26/15
WHEREAS, the Spruance Plant is DuPont's largest
manufacturing site in terms of both employment and capital
investment; and
WHEREAS, Kevlar° is a name that has become synonymous
with lifesaving products; and
WHEREAS, Kevlar°, a high-strength fiber, was first
developed in 1965 by DuPont scientist, Stephanie Kwolek, a
true pioneer for women in science; and
WHEREAS, Kevlar° is credited with shielding more than
3,000 law enforcement officers and an unknown number of
military personnel from serious injury or death; and
WHEREAS, the company has invested more than $50 million
over the past several years to expand production capacity for
Kevlar° at their Chesterfield County Spruance facility; and
WHEREAS, DuPont scientists have put Kevlar°'s high-
strength but lightweight properties to use in new ways,
including everything from the space shuttle to surfboards and
automobile tires, to protecting the satellites that help make
modern, global communications possible; and
WHEREAS, DuPont, as part of the 50th anniversary of
Kevlar°, has launched the Dare Bigger TM campaign, which
encourages people to submit stories about how Kevlar has
changed their businesses or their lives.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chesterfield
County Board of Supervisors recognizes and congratulates the
outstanding contributions of E. I. du Pont de Nemours and
Company, expresses the appreciation of all residents for its
service to Chesterfield County, and extends congratulations
on the 50th anniversary of the invention of Kevlar°.
AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that a copy of this
resolution be presented to E. I. du Pont de Nemours and
Company and that this resolution be permanently recorded
among the papers of this Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield
County, Virginia.
Ayes: Elswick, Warren, Jaeckle, Holland and Gecker.
Nays: None.
8.B.1.b.
RECOGNIZING COUNTY EMPLOYEES UPON THEIR RETIREMENT
8.B.1.b.l. LIEUTENANT DAVID J. HAMMOND, FIRE AND EMERGENCY
MEDICAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT
On motion of Mr. Warren, seconded by Ms. Jaeckle, the Board
adopted the following resolution:
WHEREAS, Lieutenant David J. Hammond retired from the
Fire and Emergency Medical Services Department, Chesterfield
County, on August 1, 2015; and
15-961
08/26/15
9
19
9
WHEREAS, Lieutenant Hammond attended Recruit School #23
in 1990, and has faithfully served the county and its
residents for 25 years in various assignments; and
WHEREAS, Lieutenant Hammond served as a firefighter at
the Ettrick, Midlothian, Airport and Bensley Fire and EMS
Stations; and
WHEREAS, Lieutenant Hammond was promoted to Lieutenant
in 1999, and served as a company officer at the Clover Hill,
Dutch Gap, and Bensley Fire and EMS Stations; and
WHEREAS, Lieutenant Hammond has been a member of the
Technical Rescue Team since the team's inception in 1998; and
WHEREAS, Lieutenant Hammond was the lead instructor for
Recruit Schools #33 and 434 while assigned to the Training
and Education Division; and
WHEREAS, Lieutenant Hammond was a member of a department
team that was deployed to Baton Rouge and St. Bernard Parish,
Louisiana to assist localities following Hurricane Katrina in
2005; and
WHEREAS, Lieutenant Hammond was recognized with an EMS
Unit Citation for his exceptional teamwork and professional
manner displayed while caring for a citizen in cardiac arrest
in November 2006; and
WHEREAS, Lieutenant Hammond was recognized with a Unit
Citation for his teamwork displayed controlling a fire
resulting in successful search and rescue efforts in
September 2007; and
WHEREAS, Lieutenant Hammond was recognized with a
Lifesave Award for his role in saving the life of a citizen
trapped inside a structure fire in October 2013; and
WHEREAS, Lieutenant Hammond used his computer knowledge
and skills to create a tool that enabled personnel to
accurately and consistently document the delivery, dispensing
and reporting for diesel fuel in the fire stations which is
still in use today, and allows for a quick and accurate
accounting.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chesterfield
County Board of Supervisors recognizes the contributions of
Lieutenant David J. Hammond, expresses the appreciation of
all residents for his service to the county, and extends
their appreciation for his dedicated service and
congratulations upon his retirement.
Ayes: Elswick, Warren, Jaeckle, Holland and Gecker.
Nays: None.
15-962
08/26/15
8.B.1.b.2. FIREFIGHTER DOUGLAS C. AYERS, FIRE AND EMERGENCY
MEDICAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT
On motion of Mr. Warren, seconded by Ms. Jaeckle, the Board
adopted the following resolution:
WHEREAS, Firefighter Douglas C. Ayers will retire from
the Fire and Emergency Medical Services Department,
Chesterfield County, on September 1, 2015; and
WHEREAS, Firefighter Ayers attended Recruit School #23
in 1990, and has faithfully served the county and its
residents for 25 years in various assignments; and
WHEREAS, Firefighter Ayers served at the Manchester,
Clover Hill, Bon Air, Swift Creek, Beach Road and Matoaca
Fire and EMS Stations; and
WHEREAS, Firefighter Ayers was certified as an Emergency
Medical Technician - Cardiac Technician in 1992, and
Paramedic in 1994, providing advanced life support services;
and
WHEREAS, Firefighter Ayers was recognized with an
Emergency Medical Services Award for saving the life of a
newborn baby in December 1991; and
WHEREAS, Firefighter Ayers was recognized with an
Emergency Medical Services Award for saving the life of a
citizen suffering from cardiac arrest in December 1992; and
WHEREAS, Firefighter Ayers was recognized with a Unit
Citation for his teamwork displayed controlling a fire
resulting in successful search and rescue efforts in March
2000; and
WHEREAS, Firefighter Ayers was recognized with a Unit
Citation and Lifesave Award for his teamwork and actions
resulting in saving lives of children trapped inside a house
fire in March 2007.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chesterfield
County Board of Supervisors recognizes the contributions of
Firefighter Douglas C. Ayers, expresses the appreciation of
all residents for his service to the county, and extends
their appreciation for his dedicated service and
congratulations upon his retirement.
Ayes: Elswick, Warren, Jaeckle, Holland and Gecker.
Nays: None.
8.B.1.b.3. SERGEANT BARRY D. BOWMAN, POLICE DEPARTMENT
On motion of Mr. Warren, seconded by Ms. Jaeckle, the Board '�Vj
adopted the following resolution:
WHEREAS, Sergeant Barry D. Bowman will retire from the
Chesterfield County Police Department on September 1, 2015,
after providing over 31 years of quality service to the
residents of Chesterfield County; and
15-963
08/26/15
WHEREAS, Sergeant Bowman has faithfully served the
county in the capacity of Patrol Officer, Detective, Acting
Administrative Lieutenant, Acting Sergeant and Sergeant; and
WHEREAS, during his tenure, Sergeant Bowman has served
in various assignments, including Field Training Officer,
Multi -jurisdictional Interdiction Task Force member, Richmond
Metropolitan Multi -jurisdictional Grand Jury Task Force
member, Police Quality Council member, Asset Forfeiture
Coordinator, Off Duty Sergeant, Field Training Officer
Sergeant, Administrative Sergeant, and K-9 Sergeant; and
WHEREAS, Sergeant Bowman was the recipient of a Chief's
Commendation for his decisive actions and outstanding
leadership in coordinating the successful conclusion to a
dangerous, high speed pursuit; and
WHEREAS, Sergeant Bowman was recognized with a Unit
Citation for his leadership of the K-9 Unit for the exemplary
service provided to the residents of Chesterfield County,
fellow police officers, and for the multi -jurisdictional
support provided to local law enforcement agencies; and
WHEREAS, Sergeant Bowman is recognized for his excellent
communications and human relations skills, his multi -tasking
skills, strong work ethic and teamwork, all of which he has
utilized within the Police Department and in assisting
residents of Chesterfield County; and
WHEREAS, during his tenure, Sergeant Bowman has received
numerous letters of commendation, thanks and appreciation for
services rendered; and
WHEREAS, Sergeant Bowman has provided the Chesterfield
County Police Department with many years of loyal and
dedicated service; and
WHEREAS, Chesterfield County and the Board of
Supervisors will miss Sergeant Bowman's diligent service.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chesterfield
County Board of Supervisors recognizes Sergeant Barry D.
Bowman and extends on behalf of its members and the residents
of Chesterfield County, appreciation for his service to the
county, congratulations upon his retirement, and best wishes
for a long and happy retirement.
Ayes: Elswick, Warren, Jaeckle, Holland and Gecker.
Nays: None.
8.B.1.b.4. CORPORAL JAMES A. FARROW, POLICE DEPARTMENT
On motion of Mr. Warren, seconded by Ms. Jaeckle, the Board
adopted the following resolution:
WHEREAS, Corporal James A. Farrow will retire from the
Chesterfield County Police Department on September 1, 2015,
after providing 24 years of quality service to the residents
of Chesterfield County; and
15-964
08/26/15
WHEREAS, Corporal Farrow has faithfully served the
county in the capacity of Patrol Officer, Senior Police
Officer, Master Police Officer, Career Police Officer and
Corporal; and
WHEREAS, Corporal Farrow has also served as Field
Training Officer and School Resource Officer; and
WHEREAS, Corporal Farrow was the recipient of a
Meritorious Service award for his actions during an attempted
suicide in October 1991, whereby his personal bravery and
self-sacrifice saved the life of an individual, armed with a
shotgun, who was very despondent and suicidal; and
WHEREAS, Corporal Farrow is recognized for his
communications and human relations skills, his
professionalism and teamwork, all of which he has utilized
within the Police Department and in assisting residents of
Chesterfield County; and
WHEREAS, Corporal Farrow has received numerous letters
of commendation, thanks and appreciation for services
rendered; and
WHEREAS, Corporal Farrow has provided the Chesterfield
County Police Department with many years of loyal and
dedicated service; and
WHEREAS, Chesterfield County and the Board of
Supervisors will miss Corporal Farrow's diligent service.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chesterfield
County Board of Supervisors recognizes Corporal James A.
Farrow, and extends on behalf of its members and the
residents of Chesterfield County, appreciation for his
service to the county, congratulations upon his retirement,
and best wishes for a long and happy retirement.
Ayes: Elswick, Warren, Jaeckle, Holland and Gecker.
Nays: None.
8.B.1.b.5.
MRS. DORENA C. OSTWINKLE, POLICE DEPARTMENT
On motion of Mr. Warren, seconded by Ms. Jaeckle, the Board
adopted the following resolution:
WHEREAS, Mrs. Dorena C. Ostwinkle will retire from the
Chesterfield County Police Department on September 1, 2015,
after providing 25 years of outstanding quality service to
the residents of Chesterfield County; and
WHEREAS, Mrs. Ostwinkle has faithfully served the county
in the capacity of Senior Clerk Typist/Receptionist, Senior
Office Assistant, Customer Service Representative and Senior
Customer Service Representative; and
15-965
08/26/15
WHEREAS, Mrs. Ostwinkle and her co-workers were the
recipient of a Unit Citation Award for the professionalism,
dedication and diligence displayed in achieving a 99.7
percent accuracy rate in records management and providing
superior customer service while the department was operating
well below authorized staffing; and
WHEREAS, Mrs. Ostwinkle had an instrumental role in the
relocation of the Record Room to another building, keeping a
Positive attitude during the entire move and ensuring that
the quality of customer service was maintained at the highest
levels; and
WHEREAS, Mrs. Ostwinkle was recognized for her
recommendation to change the paper color VCIN validation
letters to give recipients a visual reminder that an
immediate response was needed, and this suggestion resulted
in nearly a 100 percent return rate eliminating time-
consuming and costly follow-up; and
WHEREAS, Mrs. Ostwinkle was consistently praised during
her career for her diligence in treating each customer with
kindness and respect; and
WHEREAS, Mrs. Ostwinkle was an excellent team player and
always displayed the utmost professionalism in her daily
interactions with internal and external customers; and
WHEREAS, Mrs. Ostwinkle has provided the Chesterfield
County Police Department with many years of loyal and
dedicated service;'and
WHEREAS, Chesterfield County and the Board of
Supervisors will miss Mrs. Ostwinkle's diligent service.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chesterfield
County Board of Supervisors recognizes Mrs. Dorena C.
Ostwinkle, and extends on behalf of its members and the
residents of Chesterfield County, appreciation for her
service to the county, congratulations upon her retirement,
and best wishes for a long and happy retirement.
Ayes: Elswick, Warren, Jaeckle, Holland and Gecker.
Nays: None.
8.B.1.b.6. SERGEANT CURTIS C. TANNER, SR., POLICE DEPARTMENT
On motion of Mr. Warren, seconded by Ms. Jaeckle, the Board
adopted the following resolution:
WHEREAS, Sergeant Curtis C. Tanner, Sr. will retire from
the Chesterfield County Police Department on September 1,
2015, after providing nearly 32 years of outstanding quality
service to the residents of Chesterfield County; and
WHEREAS, Sergeant Tanner has faithfully served the
county in the capacity of Patrol Officer, Detective and
Sergeant; and
15-966
08/26/15
WHEREAS, Sergeant Tanner has also served as a Field
Training Officer, Evidence Technician, Breathalyzer Operator,
and as a member of the Marine Patrol, Police Quality Council
and Critical Incident Stress Management Team; and
WHEREAS, Sergeant Tanner has been a general instructor
and is recognized as an excellent radar instructor and
veteran driving instructor, tasks which he has performed for
more than 20 years; and IJ
WHEREAS, Sergeant Tanner has served in various
assignments during his career to include lead patrol
sergeant, administrative sergeant, Traffic Unit sergeant,
Community Policing sergeant and School Resource sergeant; and
WHEREAS, Sergeant Tanner received a Life Saving Award
for his quick and efficient efforts in applying pressure to
the wounds of a homicidal and suicidal suspect who had cut
his wrist in an attempt to end his life; and
WHEREAS, Sergeant Tanner was recognized with the Mason
T. Chalkley Supervisory Award for Excellence for his genuine
concern for those under his command and his recognition of
their unique talents and the individualism they possess; and
WHEREAS, Sergeant Tanner is recognized for his excellent
communications and human relations skills, his
professionalism and his teamwork, all of which he has
utilized within the Police Department and in delivering
outstanding customer service to the residents of Chesterfield
County; and I I
WHEREAS, Sergeant Tanner has received numerous letters
of commendation, thanks and appreciation for services
rendered; and
WHEREAS, Sergeant Tanner has provided the Chesterfield
County Police Department with many years of loyal and
dedicated service; and
WHEREAS, Chesterfield County and the Board of
Supervisors will miss Sergeant Tanner's diligent service.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chesterfield
County Board of Supervisors recognizes Sergeant Curtis C.
Tanner, Sr., and extends on behalf of its members and the
residents of Chesterfield County, appreciation for his
service to the county, congratulations upon his retirement,
and best wishes for a long and happy retirement.
Ayes: Elswick, Warren, Jaeckle, Holland and Gecker.
Nays: None.
15-967
08/26/15
8.B.1.b.7. MR. LESTER L. PRYOR, JR., JUVENILE DETENTION.HOME
On motion of Mr. Warren, seconded by Ms. Jaeckle, the Board
adopted the following resolution:
WHEREAS, Mr. Lester L. Pryor Jr. retired from the
Chesterfield County Juvenile Detention Home on August 1,
2015, after providing over 18 years of quality service to the
citizens of Chesterfield County; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Pryor has faithfully served the county's
Juvenile Detention Home in his role of youth supervisor; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Pryor has provided the residents of the
Chesterfield Juvenile Detention Home with quality care and
supervision; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Pryor was certified and served as a
statewide instructor in Handle With Care, the Department of
Juvenile Justice's mandated physical restraint program; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Pryor has dedicated 18-1/2 years of service
to working with troubled youth; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Pryor served with distinction on the
overnight shift for many years, competently and capably
handling the unique challenges of that shift; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Pryor was a TQI graduate and Quality
Council member.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chesterfield
County Board of Supervisors recognizes Mr. Lester L. Pryor,
Jr., and extends on behalf of its members and the citizens of
Chesterfield County, appreciation for his years of loyal
service to the county, congratulations upon his retirement,
and best wishes for a long and happy retirement.
Ayes: Elswick, Warren, Jaeckle, Holland and Gecker.
Nays: None.
8.B.1.b.8. MR. STANLEY A. PEGRAM, UTILITIES DEPARTMENT
On motion of Mr. Warren, seconded by Ms. Jaeckle, the Board
adopted the following resolution:
WHEREAS, Mr. Stanley A. Pegram retired from Chesterfield
County Utilities Department on June 30, 2015; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Pegram began his public service with
Chesterfield County on May 25, 1981, when he was hired by the
Chesterfield Utilities Department as a Laborer I; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Pegram was promoted several times within
his division and has served faithfully as a Principal Labor
Crew Chief from 1996 until his retirement; and
15-968
08/26/15
WHEREAS, Mr. Pegram directed the day-to-day activities
of crews responsible for the maintenance and repair of water
distribution lines and associated appurtenances; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Pegram focused on providing world-class
customer service by consistently meeting or exceeding
customer expectations; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Pegram continuously utilized his knowledge
of mainline repair techniques and experience to provide water
�4j
service that was safe, reliable and environmentally sound;
and
WHEREAS, Mr. Pegram was highly respected and liked by
his peers and coworkers; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Pegram willingly and faithfully worked
after hours and during emergencies to restore water service
to customers regardless of weather conditions or the time of
day; and
WHEREAS, throughout his career with Chesterfield County,
Mr. Pegram displayed dependability, aptitude, good character
and values.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chesterfield
County Board of Supervisors recognizes Mr. Stanley A. Pegram
and extends on behalf of its members and citizens of
Chesterfield County, appreciation for more than 34 years of
exceptional service to the county.
Ayes: Elswick, Warren, Jaeckle, Holland and Gecker.
Nays: None.
8.B.l.c. IDENTIFYING LAND USES THAT ARE URBAN DEVELOPMENT
AREA (UDA)-LIKE
On motion of Mr. Warren, seconded by Ms. Jaeckle, the Board
adopted the following resolution identifying land uses in the
Comprehensive Plan which meet the intent of "UDA-like" as
defined by the Code of Virginia, Section 15.2-223.1:
WHEREAS, during the 2014 session of the General
Assembly legislation was passed requiring the Commonwealth
Transportation Board (CTB) to develop a statewide
transportation project prioritization process; and
WHEREAS, the prioritization process developed by the
CTB includes, as a first step, screening projects to
determine if they meet needs identified in the state long-
range multimodal transportation plan for Corridors of
Statewide Significance, Regional Networks or Urban
Development Areas; and
WHEREAS, Section 15.2-2223.1 of the Code of Virginia
defines Urban Development Areas (UDAs) as areas designated
by a locality that are appropriate for higher density
development, primarily due to proximity to transportation
facilities, public utilities or areas for redevelopment or
infill; and
15-969
08/26/15
9
WHEREAS, the Chesterfield County Comprehensive Plan
dated October 24, 2012 does not designate specific areas as
UDAs, however, includes land use categories in Chapter 10
(pages 91-113) which meet the intent of Section 15.2-2223.1
of the Code of Virginia, including Regional Mixed Use,
Community Mixed Use, Residential Mixed Use, Medium -High
Density Residential, and High Density Residential, as well
as the following land use categories from area plans:
• Residential 7.01-14 units per acre (Eastern
Midlothian Plan)
• High Density Residential (Jahnke/Chippenham
Plan)
• Residential 7.01-10 units per acre (Jefferson
Davis Corridor Plan)
• Community Commercial
Plan)
• Regional Mixed Use
Plan)
(Jefferson Davis Corridor
(Jefferson Davis Corridor
• Planned Transition Area (Midlothian Area
Community Plan)
• Office/Residential Mixed Use (Northern
Courthouse Road Community Plan)
• Mixed Use Corridor (Route 360 Corridor Plan);
and
WHEREAS, these land use categories incorporate
principals of traditional neighborhood design such as
pedestrian -friendly road design, interconnection of new
local streets to existing streets, connectivity of road and
pedestrian networks, preservation of natural areas, mixed-
use neighborhoods including affordable housing; and
WHEREAS, Chesterfield County anticipates these areas
to develop at a rate proportional to the historic growth
rate of the county; and
WHEREAS, it is beneficial for Chesterfield County to
acknowledge these land use areas as meeting the intent of
Section 15.2-2223.1 in order to pursue funding from the
Commonwealth of Virginia for transportation needs.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chesterfield
County Board of Supervisors identifies the following land
use areas as meeting the intent of Section 15.2-2223.1 of
the Code of Virginia as shown on the map titled "Map of
Proposed UDAs", dated June 2015, prepared by Chesterfield
County Planning Department.
Ayes: Elswick, Warren, Jaeckle, Holland and Gecker.
Nays: None.
15-970
08/26/15
8.B.2.
8.B.2.a.
REQUESTS FOR PERMITS TO DISPLAY FIREWORKS DISPLAYS
8.B.2.a.1.
AT 70 BELLONA ARSENAL
FOR A BIRTHDAY CELEBRATION
On motion of Mr. Warren, seconded by Ms. Jaeckle, the Board
approved a permit for George Hoover to stage a fireworks
display at 70 Bellona Arsenal, Midlothian, Virginia on
Saturday, October 3, 2015, with a rain date of October 4,
2015.
Ayes: Elswick, Warren, Jaeckle, Holland and Gecker.
Nays: None.
8.B.2.a.2. FOR A LABOR DAY CELEBRATION
On motion of Mr. Warren, seconded by Ms. Jaeckle, the Board
approved a permit for George Hoover to stage a fireworks
display at 70 Bellona Arsenal, Midlothian, Virginia on
Friday, September 5, 2015, with rain dates of Saturday,
September 6 or Sunday, September 7, 2015.
Ayes: Elswick, Warren, Jaeckle, Holland and Gecker.
Nays: None.
8.B.2.b.
FOR THE CHESDIN LANDING LUAU
On motion of Mr. Warren, seconded by Ms. Jaeckle, the Board
approved a permit to stage a fireworks display for the
Chesdin Landing Luau on Sunday, August 30, 2015, with a rain
date of September 5, 2015.
Ayes: Elswick, Warren, Jaeckle, Holland and Gecker.
Nays: None.
8.B.3. APPROVAL OF MEMORANDUMS OF UNDERSTANDING
8.B.3.a. BETWEEN THE CHESTERFIELD COUNTY FIRE AND EMERGENCY
MEDICAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT AND THE VIRGINIA STATE
POLICE DELINEATING RESPONSIBILITIES ASSOCIATED WITH
THE MED -FLIGHT AIR MEDICAL TRANSPORT PROGRAM
On motion of Mr. Warren, seconded by Ms. Jaeckle, the Board
approved the Memorandum of Understanding between Chesterfield
County Fire and Emergency Medical Services and the Virginia
State Police delineating responsibilities associated with the
Med-Flight Air Medical Transport Program. (It is noted a copy
of the Memorandum of Understanding is filed with the papers
of this Board.)
Ayes: Elswick, Warren, Jaeckle, Holland and Gecker.
Nays: None.
15-971
08/26/15
8.B.3.b. WITH THE COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, DEPARTMENT OF
EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT FOR THE ALL HAZARDS INCIDENT
MANAGEMENT TEAM
On motion of Mr. Warren, seconded by Ms. Jaeckle, the Board
authorized the Fire Chief of Chesterfield Fire and Emergency
Medical Services to sign and execute a Memorandum of
Understanding document with the Commonwealth of Virginia,
Department of Emergency Management for the Central Virginia
All Hazards Incident Management Team. (It is noted a copy of
the Memorandum of Understanding is filed with the papers of
this Board.)
Ayes: Elswick, Warren, Jaeckle, Holland and Gecker.
Nays: None.
8.B.4. SET DATES FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS
8.B.4.a. TO CONSIDER AN AMENDMENT TO THE COUNTY CODE
RELATING TO BACKGROUND INVESTIGATIONS OF APPLICANTS
FOR EMPLOYMENT WITH THE COUNTY FIRE AND EMERGENCY
MEDICAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT
On motion of Mr. Warren, seconded by Ms. Jaeckle, the Board
set September 16, 2015, for a public hearing for the Board to
consider amending Section 2-72 of the County Code relating to
background investigations of applicants for employment with
Chesterfield County Fire and Emergency Medical Services
Department.
Ayes: Elswick, Warren, Jaeckle, Holland and Gecker.
Nays: None.
8.B.4.b. TO CONSIDER APPROVING THE TRANSFER OF PROPERTY ON
WOODPECKER ROAD TO CHESTERFIELD ALTERNATIVES,
INCORPORATED FOR THE BUILD -A -HOUSE PROGRAM
On motion of Mr. Warren, seconded by Ms. Jaeckle, the Board
set September 16, 2015, for a public hearing for the Board to
consider approving the transfer of property at 19801
Woodpecker Road to Chesterfield Alternatives, Inc. for the
Build -A -House program.
Ayes: Elswick, Warren, Jaeckle, Holland and Gecker.
Nays: None.
8.B.4.c. TO CONSIDER AN AMENDMENT TO THE COUNTY CODE
RELATING TO SIGNS
On motion of Mr. Warren, seconded by Ms. Jaeckle, the Board
set September 16, 2015, for a public hearing for the Board to
consider the proposed amendment to the County Code relative
to signs.
Ayes: Elswick, Warren, Jaeckle, Holland and Gecker.
Nays: None.
15-972
08/26/15
8.B.5.
APPROVAL OF THE CHESTERFIELD COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT
TOWING CONTRACT FEE ADDENDUM
On motion of Mr. Warren, seconded by Ms. Jaeckle, the Board
approved the Chesterfield County Police Department Towing
Contract fee addendum as approved by the Chesterfield County
Police Department Towing Advisory Board.
Ayes:
Nays:
8.B.6.
Elswick, Warren, Jaeckle, Holland and Gecker.
None.
AUTHORIZE THE COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR TO RENEW A HEALTH
CARE CONTRACT WITH ANTHEM BLUE CROSS AND BLUE SHIELD
AND EXECUTE A DENTAL CONTRACT WITH DELTA DENTAL OF
VIRGINIA FOR 2016
On motion of Mr. Warren, seconded by Ms. Jaeckle, the Board
authorized the County Administrator to renew the county's
contract with Anthem Blue Cross and Blue Shield (Anthem) and
execute a contract with Delta Dental of Virginia (Delta) for
2016.
Ayes:
Nays:
8.B.7.
Elswick, Warren, Jaeckle, Holland and Gecker.
None.
RENEWAL OF LEASE OF OFFICE SPACE FOR THE SOCIAL
SERVICES DEPARTMENT
On motion of Mr. Warren, seconded by Ms. Jaeckle, the Board
authorized the County Administrator to execute a lease
agreement for office space with CS Development, Inc. for use
by the Social Services Department.
Ayes:
Nays:
8.B.8.
Elswick, Warren, Jaeckle, Holland and Gecker.
None.
ACCEPTANCE OF GRANT AND APPROPRIATION OF FUNDS FROM
THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY AND
AWARD OF CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT FOR THE MID -LOTHIAN
MINES PARK STREAM RESTORATION
On motion of Mr. Warren, seconded by Ms. Jaeckle, the Board
accepted a grant and appropriated funding up to $421,653, as
anticipated grant funding reimbursements, from the Virginia
Department of Environmental Quality and authorized the County
Administrator to execute any necessary grant -related
documents; awarded the construction contract to Dorin
Landscaping Incorporated in the amount of $349,958; and
authorized the County Administrator to execute the necessary
documents.
Ayes: Elswick, Warren, Jaeckle, Holland and Gecker.
Nays: None.
15-973
08/26/15
8.B.9. APPROVAL OF A LEASE PURCHASE AGREEMENT WITH BANC OF
AMERICA FOR THE FINANCING OF ONE HUNDRED SCHOOL BUSES
On motion of Mr. Warren, seconded by Ms. Jaeckle, the Board
authorized the County Administrator to execute a seven-year
lease purchase agreement, once approved by the County
Attorney, with a fixed interest rate of 1.6918 percent with
Banc of America Public Capital Corporation and appropriated
the associated funds for the financing of 100 school buses.
And, further, the Board adopted the following resolution:
A RESOLUTION OF THE GOVERNING BODY OF COUNTY OF
CHESTERFIELD, VIRGINIA, AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION
AND DELIVERY OF A MASTER EQUIPMENT LEASE/PURCHASE
AGREEMENT WITH BANC OF AMERICA PUBLIC CAPITAL CORP,
AS LESSOR, AND SEPARATE SCHEDULES THERETO FOR THE
ACQUISITION, PURCHASE, FINANCING AND LEASING OF
CERTAIN EQUIPMENT WITHIN THE TERMS HEREIN PROVIDED;
AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION AND DELIVERY OF OTHER
DOCUMENTS REQUIRED IN CONNECTION THEREWITH; AND
AUTHORIZING ALL OTHER ACTIONS NECESSARY TO THE
CONSUMMATION OF THE TRANSACTIONS CONTEMPLATED BY
THIS RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, County of Chesterfield, Virginia (the
"Lessee"), a county duly organized and existing under the
laws of the State/ Commonwealth of Virginia, is authorized by
the laws of the State/ Commonwealth of Virginia to purchase,
acquire and lease personal property (tangible and intangible)
for the benefit of the Lessee and its inhabitants and to
enter into contracts with respect thereto; and
WHEREAS, the governing body of the Lessee (the "Board")
has determined that a need exists for the acquisition,
purchase and financing of certain property consisting of
school buses (collectively, the "Equipment") on the terms
herein provided; and
WHEREAS, in order to acquire such Equipment, the Lessee
proposes to enter into that certain Master Equipment
Lease/Purchase Agreement (the "Agreement") with Banc of
America Public Capital Corp (or one of its affiliates), as
lessor (the "Lessor"), substantially in the proposed form
presented to the Board at this meeting, and separate
Schedules thereto substantially in the form attached to the
Agreement; and
WHEREAS, the Board deems it for the benefit of the
Lessee and for the efficient and effective administration
thereof to enter into the Agreement and separate Schedules
relating thereto from time to time as provided in the
Agreement for the purchase, acquisition, financing and
leasing of the Equipment to be therein described on the terms
and conditions therein and herein provided;
15-974
08/26/15
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT AND IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the
governing body of the Lessee as follows:
Section 1. Findings and Determinations. It is hereby
found and determined that the terms of the Agreement
(including the form of Schedule of Property and the form of
Rental Payment Schedule, both attached thereto), in the form
presented to the Board at this meeting, are in the best
interests of the Lessee for the acquisition, purchase,
financing and leasing of the Equipment.
Section 2. Approval of Documents. The form, terms
and provisions of the Agreement (including the form of
Schedule of Property and the form of Rental Payment Schedule,
both attached thereto) are hereby approved in substantially
the forms presented at this meeting, with such insertions,
omissions and changes as shall be approved by the County
Administrator of the Lessee (the "Authorized Official")
executing the same, the execution of such documents being
conclusive evidence of such approval. The Authorized
Officials are each hereby authorized and directed to sign and
deliver on behalf of the Lessee the Agreement, each Schedule
thereto under which a separate Lease (as defined in the
Agreement) is created, each Rental Payment Schedule attached
thereto and any related exhibits attached thereto if and when
required; provided, however, that, without further
authorization from the governing body of the Lessee, (a) the
aggregate principal component of Rental Payments under all
Leases entered into pursuant to the Agreement shall not
exceed $8,649,800.00; (b) the maximum term under any Lease
entered into pursuant to the Agreement shall not exceed
[seven] years; and (c) the maximum interest rate used to
determine the interest component of Rental Payments under
each Lease shall not exceed the lesser of the maximum rate
permitted by law or [ten percent (10%)] per annum. The
Authorized Officials may sign and deliver Leases to the
Lessor on behalf of the Lessee pursuant to the Agreement on
such terms and conditions as they shall determine are in the
best interests of the Lessee up to the maximum aggregate
principal component, maximum term and maximum interest rate
provided above. The foregoing authorization shall remain in
effect for a period of two years from the date hereof during
which the Authorized Officials are authorized to sign and
deliver Leases pursuant to the Agreement on the terms and
conditions herein provided and to be provided in each such
Lease.
Section 3. Other Actions Authorized. The officers
and employees of the Lessee shall take all action necessary
or reasonably required by the parties to the Agreement to
carry out, give effect to and consummate the transactions
contemplated thereby (including the execution and delivery of
Final Acceptance Certificates, Escrow Agreements and any tax
certificate and agreement, as contemplated in the Agreement)
and to take all action necessary in conformity therewith,
including, without limitation, the execution and delivery of
any closing and other documents required to be delivered in
connection with the Agreement and each Lease.
15-975
08/26/15
9
9
Section 4. No General Liability. Nothing contained
in this Resolution, the Agreement, any Lease, any Escrow
Agreement nor any other instrument shall be construed with
respect to the Lessee as incurring a pecuniary liability or
charge upon the general credit of the Lessee or against its
taxing power, nor shall the breach of any agreement contained
in this Resolution, the Agreement, any Lease, any Escrow
Agreement or any other instrument or document executed in
connection therewith impose any pecuniary liability upon the
Lessee or any charge upon its general credit or against its
taxing power, except to the extent that the Rental Payments
payable under each Lease entered into pursuant to the
Agreement are limited obligations of the Lessee, subject to
annual appropriation, as provided in the Agreement.
Section 5. Appointment of Authorized Lessee
Representatives. The County Administrator of the Lessee is
hereby designated to act as authorized representatives of the
Lessee for purposes of each Lease and the related Escrow
Agreement until such time as the governing body of the Lessee
shall designate any other or different authorized
representative for purposes of the Agreement and any Lease or
Escrow Agreement.
Section 6. Severability. If any section, paragraph,
clause or provision of this Resolution shall for any reason
be held to be invalid or unenforceable, the invalidity or
unenforceability of such section, paragraph, clause or
provision shall not affect any of the remaining provisions of
this Resolution.
Section 7. Effective Date. This Resolution shall be
effective immediately upon its approval and adoption.
Ayes: Elswick, Warren, Jaeckle, Holland and Gecker.
Nays: None.
8.B.10. STATE ROADS ACCEPTANCE
On motion of Mr. Warren, seconded by Ms. Jaeckle, the Board
adopted the following resolution:
WHEREAS, the streets described below are shown on a
plat recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of
Chesterfield County; and
WHEREAS, the Resident Engineer for the Virginia
Department of Transportation has advised this Board the
streets meet the requirements established by the Subdivision
Street Requirements of the Virginia Department of
Transportation.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that this Board requests
the Virginia Department of Transportation to add the streets
described below to the secondary system of state highways,
pursuant to Section 33.2-705, Code of Virginia, and the
Department's Subdivision Street Requirements.
15-976
08/26/15
AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that this Board guarantees
a clear and unrestricted right-of-way, as described, and any
necessary easements for cuts, fills and drainage.
AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that a certified copy of
this resolution be forwarded to the Resident Engineer for the
Virginia Department of Transportation.
Project/Subdivision: Queensgate Section 2
Type Change to the Secondary System miles of State Highways:
1�j
Addition
Reason for Change: New subdivision street
Pursuant to Code of Virginia Statute: §33.2-705
Street Name and/or Route Number
• Miners Trail Road, State Route Number 7777
From: Coalfield Road, (Route 754)
To: Existing End of Maintenance of Miners Trail Road, (Route
7777), a distance of: 0.26 miles.
Recordation Reference: Plat Book 220, Page 67
Right of Way width (feet) = 50
• Miners Trail Court, State Route Number 7819
From: Miners Trail Road, (Route 7777)
To: Cul -de -Sac, a distance of: 0.04 miles.
Recordation Reference: Plat Book 220, Page 67
Right of Way width (feet) = 40
Ayes: Elswick, Warren, Jaeckle, Holland and Gecker.
Nays: None.
8.B.11. REQUEST FOR ENTERTAINMENT FESTIVAL PERMIT FOR SAINT
AUGUSTINE CATHOLIC CHURCH'S FESTIVAL
On motion of Mr. Warren, seconded by Ms. Jaeckle, the Board
granted a music and entertainment festival permit for St.
Augustine Catholic Church's Festival on Saturday, September
12, 2015, subject to the conditions filed with the papers of
this Board.
Ayes: Elswick, Warren, Jaeckle, Holland and Gecker.
Nays: None.
8.B.12. REQUEST TO AID THIBAULT ENTERPRISES, LLC IN THE
ACQUISITION OF OFFSITE SEWER AND TEMPORARY
CONSTRUCTION EASEMENTS TO SERVE ITS COMMERCIAL
DEVELOPMENT ON JEFFERSON DAVIS HIGHWAY
On motion of Mr. Warren, seconded by Ms. Jaeckle, the Board
authorized Right of Way staff to aid Thibault Enterprises,
LLC in the acquisition of sewer and temporary construction
easements to serve its commercial development on Jefferson 1�qj
Davis Highway, subject to the developer executing a contract
agreeing to pay all costs.
Ayes: Elswick, Warren, Jaeckle, Holland and Gecker.
Nays: None.
15-977
08/26/15
8.B.13. ACCEPTANCE OF PARCELS OF LAND
8.B.13.a. ALONG NORTH WOOLRIDGE ROAD FROM BB HUNT, L.L.C.
On motion of Mr. Warren, seconded by Ms. Jaeckle, the Board
accepted the conveyance of a parcel of land containing 0.059
acres along North Woolridge Road from BB Hunt, L.L.C., and
authorized the County Administrator to execute the deed. (It
is noted a copy of the plat is filed with the papers of this
Board.)
Ayes: Elswick, Warren, Jaeckle, Holland and Gecker.
Nays: None.
8.B.13.b. ALONG THE EAST RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF NORTH
OTTERDALE ROAD FROM BROOKCREEK ESTATES OWNERS
ASSOCIATION, INCORPORATED
On motion of Mr. Warren, seconded by Ms. Jaeckle, the Board
accepted the conveyance of a parcel of land containing 0.027
acres along the east right of way line of N. Otterdale Road
from Brookcreek Estates Owners Association, Inc., and
authorized the County Administrator to execute the deed. (It
is noted a copy of the plat is filed with the papers of this
Board.)
Ayes: Elswick, Warren, Jaeckle, Holland and Gecker.
Nays: None.
8.B.13.c. ALONG BIG OAK LANE FROM NHI BICKFORD RE, LLC
On motion of Mr. Warren, seconded by Ms. Jaeckle, the Board
accepted the conveyance of six parcels of land containing a
total of 0.21 acres along Big Oak Lane from NHI Bickford RE,
LLC and authorized the County Administrator to execute the
deed. (It is noted a copy of the plat is filed with the
papers of this Board.)
Ayes: Elswick, Warren, Jaeckle, Holland and Gecker.
Nays: None.
8.B.13.d. ALONG JEFFERSON DAVIS HIGHWAY FROM SEE YUAN CHAN
INVESTMENTS, LLC
On motion of Mr. Warren, seconded by Ms. Jaeckle, the Board
accepted the conveyance of a parcel of land along Jefferson
Davis Highway from See Yuan Chan Investments, LLC, and
authorized the County Administrator to execute the deed. (It
is noted a copy of the plat is filed with the papers of this
Board.)
Ayes: Elswick, Warren, Jaeckle, Holland and Gecker.
Nays: None.
15-978
08/26/15
8.B.13.e. FOR THE ETTRICK-MATOACA LIBRARY FROM THE VISITORS
OF VIRGINIA STATE UNIVERSITY
On motion of Mr. Warren, seconded by Ms. Jaeckle, the Board
accepted the conveyance of a parcel of land containing 3.931
acres for the Ettrick-Matoaca Library from The Visitors of
Virginia State University and authorized the County
Administrator to execute the deed. (It is noted a copy of the
plat is filed with the papers of this Board.)
Ayes: Elswick, Warren, Jaeckle, Holland and Gecker.
Nays: None.
8.B.14. REQUESTS TO QUITCLAIM
8.B.14.a. A THIRTY-FOOT VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF
TRANSPORTATION DRAINAGE EASEMENT, A PORTION OF A
VARIABLE WIDTH WATER EASEMENT AND PORTIONS OF
VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SLOPE
EASEMENTS ACROSS THE PROPERTY OF BB HUNT, L.L.C.
On motion of Mr. Warren, seconded by Ms. Jaeckle, the Board
authorized the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors and the
County Administrator to execute a quitclaim deed to vacate a
30' VDOT drainage easement, a portion of a variable width
water easement and portions of VDOT slope easements across
the property of BB Hunt, L.L.C. (It is noted a copy of the
plat is filed with the papers of this Board.)
Ayes: Elswick, Warren, Jaeckle, Holland and Gecker.
Nays: None.
8.B.14.b. A PORTION OF A TWENTY -FOOT STORM WATER MANAGEMENT
BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICE ACCESS EASEMENT ACROSS
THE PROPERTY OF RREF II - TFC WYNWOOD, LLC
On motion of Mr. Warren, seconded by Ms. Jaeckle, the Board
authorized the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors and the
County Administrator to execute a quitclaim deed to vacate a
portion of a 20' SWM/BMP access easement across the property
of RREF II - TFC Wynwood, LLC. (It is noted a copy of the
plat is filed with the papers of this Board.)
Ayes: Elswick, Warren, Jaeckle, Holland and Gecker.
Nays: None.
8.B.15. REQUESTS FOR PERMISSION
8.B.15.a. FROM RUDOLF BUTZ AND BONNIE J. BUTZ FOR AN
EXISTING AND PROPOSED FENCE TO ENCROACH WITHIN A
SIXTEEN -FOOT DRAINAGE EASEMENT AND AN EIGHT -FOOT
EASEMENT ACROSS LOT 37, STONEMILL, SECTION D
On motion of Mr. Warren, seconded by Ms. Jaeckle, the Board
granted Rudolf Butz and Bonnie J. Butz permission for an
existing and proposed fence to encroach within a 16' drainage
easement and an 8' easement across Lot 37, Stonemill, Section
D, subject to the execution of a license agreement. (It is
noted a copy of the plat is filed with the papers of this
Board.)
Ayes: Elswick, Warren, Jaeckle, Holland and Gecker.
Nays: None.
15-979
08/26/15
9
9
9
8.B.15.b. FROM JOSE C. HERRERA AND MARIA G. HERRERA FOR A
SHED AND CONCRETE PAD TO ENCROACH WITHIN AN EIGHT -
FOOT DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT ACROSS LOT 3,
BLOCK E, TINSBERRY TRACE, SECTION 3
On motion of Mr. Warren, seconded by Ms. Jaeckle, the Board
granted Jose C. Herrera and Maria G. Herrera permission for a
shed and concrete pad to encroach within an 8' drainage and
utility easement across Lot 3, Block E, Tinsberry mace,
Section 3, subject to the execution of a license agree�fn'ent.
(It is noted a copy of the plat is filed with the papers of
this Board.)
Ayes: Elswick, Warren, Jaeckle, Holland and Gecker.
Nays: None.
8.B.15.c. FROM JAMIE REBECCA MOYA FOR A PROPOSED DECK TO,_,...,_,
ENCROACH WITHIN AN EIGHT -FOOT EASEMENT ACROSS LOT
7, BLOCK D, FOXBERRY, SECTION 1
On motion of Mr. Warren, seconded by Ms. Jaeckle, the Board
granted Jamie Rebecca Moya permission for a proposed deck to
encroach within an 8' easement across Lot 7, Block D,
Foxberry, Section 1, subject to the execution of a license
agreement. (It is noted a copy of the plat is filed with the
papers of this Board.)
Ayes: Elswick, Warren, Jaeckle, Holland and Gecker.
Nays: None.
8.B.15.d. FROM KAMRAN RAIKA AND ANA RAIKA FOR A PROPOSED
BOAT DOCK TO ENCROACH IN THE IMPOUNDMENT EASEMENT
FOR SWIFT CREEK RESERVOIR
On motion of Mr. Warren, seconded by Ms. Jaeckle, the Board
granted Kamran Raika and Ana Raika permission for a proposed
boat dock to encroach in the impoundment easement for Swift
Creek Reservoir, subject to the execution of a license
agreement. (It is noted a copy of the plat is filed with the
papers of this Board.)
Ayes: Elswick, Warren, Jaeckle, Holland and Gecker.
Nays: None.
8.B.16. CONVEYANCE OF EASEMENT TO COLUMBIA GAS OF VIRGINIA,
INCORPORATED FOR AN EXISTING PIPELINE AND THE
RELOCATION OF A PORTION OF THE PIPELINE FOR THE NEW
ADDITION TO THE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION BUILDING
On motion of Mr. Warren, seconded by Ms. Jaeckle, the Board
authorized the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors and the
County Administrator to execute an agreement with Columbia
Gas of Virginia, Inc. for conveyance of an easement for an
existing pipeline and the relocation of a portion of the
pipeline for the new addition to the Chesterfield County
Administration Building. (It is noted a copy of the plat is
filed with the papers of this Board.)
Ayes: Elswick, Warren, Jaeckle, Holland and Gecker.
Nays: None.
15-980
08/26/15
8.B.17. APPROVAL OF A CONTRACT FOR THE DONATION OF A PARCEL
OF LAND TO THE COUNTY ADJACENT TO MANCHESTER MIDDLE
SCHOOL
On motion of Mr. Warren, seconded by Ms. Jaeckle, the Board
approved a contract for the donation of a parcel of land
adjacent to Manchester Middle School from Mary Lewellen
Padgett and Larry Scott Daniel and authorized the County
Administrator to execute the contract and deed. (It is noted
a copy of the plat is filed with the papers of this Board.)
Ayes:
Nays:
8.B.18.
Elswick, Warren, Jaeckle, Holland and Gecker.
None.
DESIGNATION OF A TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT AND
CONVEYANCE OF AN EASEMENT TO VERIZON FOR THE
WOOLRIDGE ROAD AND OTTERDALE ROAD IMPROVEMENTS
PROJECT
On motion of Mr. Warren, seconded by Ms. Jaeckle, the Board
designated a temporary construction easement and approved the
conveyance of an easement to Verizon for the Woolridge Road
and Otterdale Road Improvements Project and authorized the
County Administrator to execute the declaration and easement
agreement. (It is noted a copy of the plat is filed with the
papers of this Board.)
Ayes: Elswick, Warren, Jaeckle, Holland and Gecker.
Nays: None.
8.B.19. AWARD OF REQUIREMENTS CONTRACT FOR ELECTRICAL
ENGINEERING SERVICES TO BASKERVILL
On motion of Mr. Warren, seconded by Ms. Jaeckle, the Board
authorized the County Administrator to execute a requirements
contract with Baskervill for electrical engineering services
for various county projects.
Ayes: Elswick, Warren, Jaeckle, Holland and Gecker.
Nays: None.
8.B.20. AUTHORIZATION FOR THE COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR TO
EXECUTE THE SPECIAL PROJECT SERVICE AGREEMENT FOR
COLLECTING, TRANSPORTING AND PROCESSING USED
ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT
On motion of Mr. Warren, seconded by Ms. Jaeckle, the Board
authorized the County Administrator to sign the special
project service agreement with the Central Virginia Waste
Management Authority (CVWMA) for collecting, transporting and
processing used electronic equipment.
Ayes: Elswick, Warren, Jaeckle, Holland and Gecker.
Nays: None.
15-981
08/26/15
9
9
9
8.B.21. APPROPRIATION OF FUNDS RELATED TO TAXATION
MANAGEMENT SYSTEM PROJECT
On motion of Mr. Warren, seconded by Ms. Jaeckle, the Board
appropriated $400,000 in funds from residual judicial sales
proceeds to the Taxation Management System Project.
Ayes: Elswick, Warren, Jaeckle, Holland and Gecker.
Nays: None.
9. REPORTS
9.A. REPORT ON DEVELOPER WATER AND SEWER CONTRACTS
9.B. REPORT ON STATUS OF GENERAL FUND BALANCE, RESERVE FOR
FUTURE CAPITAL PROJECTS, DISTRICT IMPROVEMENT FUNDS AND
LEASE PURCHASES
On motion of Ms. Jaeckle, seconded by Mr. Gecker, the Board
accepted the following reports: a Report on Developer Water
and Sewer Contracts; and a Report on Status of General Fund
Balance, Reserve for Future Capital Projects, District
Improvement Funds and Lease Purchases.
Ayes: Elswick, Warren, Jaeckle, Holland and Gecker.
Nays: None.
10. FIFTEEN -MINUTE CITIZEN COMMENT PERIOD ON UNSCHEDULED
MATTERS
There were no requests to address the Board at this time.
11. DINNER
On motion of Ms. Jaeckle, seconded by Mr. Gecker, the Board
recessed to Room 502 for dinner.
Ayes: Elswick, Warren, Jaeckle, Holland and Gecker.
Nays: None.
Reconvening:
12. INVOCATION/MOMENT OF SILENCE
The Honorable Arthur S. Warren, Vice Chairman, Board of
Supervisors gave the invocation.
13. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG OF THE UNITED STATES OF
AMERICA
Eagle Scout Joseph Corbett led the Pledge of Allegiance to
the Flag of the United States of America.
15-982
08/26/15
14.
14.A.
RESOLUTIONS
RECOGNIZING BOY SCOUTS UPON ATTAINING THE RANK OF
EAGLE SCOUT
Ms. Ruth introduced Mr. Joseph Richard Corbett, Mr. Tyler
Alexander Zawislak, Mr. Ian Alexander Owens, Mr. Joseph
Roosevelt Matthews, Mr. Gabriel Michael Romito, and Mr.
Curtis Don Miles, II, who were present to receive their
resolutions.
On motion of Mr. Gecker, seconded by Mr. Warren, the Board
adopted the following resolution:
WHEREAS, the Boy Scouts of America was incorporated by
Mr. William D. Boyce on February 8, 1910, and was chartered
by Congress in 1916; and
WHEREAS, the Boy Scouts of America was founded to build
character, provide citizenship training and promote physical
fitness; and
WHEREAS, after earning at least 21 merit badges in a
wide variety of skills including leadership, service and
outdoor life, serving in a leadership position. in a troop,
carrying out a service project beneficial to their community,
being active in the troop, demonstrating Scout spirit, and
living up to the Scout Oath and Law, Mr. Joseph Richard
Corbett, Troop 876, sponsored by Mt. Pisgah United Methodist
Church, Mr. Tyler Alexander Zawislak and Mr. Ian Alexander
Owens, both of Troop 2806, sponsored by Woodlake United
Methodist Church, Mr. Joseph Roosevelt Matthews, Troop 2860,
also sponsored by Woodlake United Methodist Church, Mr.
Gabriel Michael Romito, Troop 436, sponsored by St. Bridget
Catholic Church, and Mr. Curtis Don Miles, II, Troop 100,
sponsored by Gillfield Baptist Church, have accomplished
those high standards of commitment and have reached the long -
sought goal of Eagle Scout, which is received by only four
percent of those individuals entering the Scouting movement;
and
WHEREAS, growing through their experiences in Scouting,
learning the lessons of responsible citizenship, and
endeavoring to prepare themselves for a role as leaders in
society, Joe, Tyler, Ian, Joseph, Gabriel and Curtis have
distinguished themselves as members of a new generation of
prepared young citizens of whom we can all be very proud.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chesterfield
County Board of Supervisors, this 26th day of August 2015,
publicly recognizes Mr. Joseph Richard Corbett, Mr. Tyler
Alexander Zawislak, Mr. Ian Alexander Owens, Mr. Joseph
Roosevelt Matthews, Mr. Gabriel Michael Romito, and Mr.
Curtis Don Miles, II, extends congratulations on their
attainment of Eagle Scout, and acknowledges the good fortune
of the county to have such outstanding young men as its
citizens.
Ayes: Elswick, Warren, Jaeckle, Holland and Gecker.
Nays: None.
15-983
08/26/15
9
9
Mr. Elswick, Mr. Gecker and Mr. Warren presented the executed
resolutions and patches to each Eagle Scout, accompanied by
members of their families, congratulated them on their
outstanding achievements and wished them well in future
endeavors.
Each Eagle Scout provided details of their Eagle Scout
project and expressed appreciation to their families and
friends for their support.
14.B. RECOGNIZING MR. LEN TUCK FOR HIS SERVICE AS PRESIDENT
OF THE BON AIR HISTORICAL SOCIETY
Ms. Ruth introduced Mr. Len Tuck, who was present to receive
the resolution.
On motion of Mr. Holland, seconded by Ms. Jaeckle, the Board
adopted the following resolution:
WHEREAS, Mr. Tuck has worked tirelessly over the past
decade as the President of the Bon Air Historical Society to
preserve and promote good stewardship of the historical,
cultural and architectural legacy of Bon Air; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Tuck has spearheaded the restoration of the
Hazen Memorial Library, the first lending library in
Chesterfield County, which was built in 1902, and had fallen
into significant disrepair prior to Mr. Tuck's purchase; and
WHEREAS, the library project is now almost complete, and
Mr. Tuck also has restored the Perrows store building, the
Hazen House, built in 1885, and multiple other properties in
Bon Air, and he is currently planning restoration of the
historic Mercer-Fraker house; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Tuck has helped to open many historic homes
in Bon Air to the community through home and garden tours,
which enabled some of these treasures to be seen by the
public for the first time; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Tuck and his wife Robin have graciously
hosted many social events, including an annual Valentine's
Day Tea, and allowed the use of their property for the long-
running Bon Air Victorian Day Festival and Parade; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Tuck initiated the "Keep Bon Air Beautiful"
campaign and has worked with Norfolk Southern Railway to
ensure and promote the future beautification of the historic
Bon Air depot site; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Tuck has set a very high standard for
integrity in conducting the business of the Bon Air
Historical Society and for the community; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Tuck has served with humbleness while
keeping Bon Air beautiful and promoting better relationships
with the business village and surrounding communities.
15-984
08/26/15
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chesterfield
County Board of Supervisors, this 26th day of August 2015,
publicly recognizes the outstanding contributions of Mr. Len
Tuck, expresses the gratitude of all Chesterfield County
residents for his many years of service, and extends its best
wishes for continued success in all of his future endeavors.
AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that a copy of this
resolution be presented to Mr. Tuck and that this resolution
be permanently recorded among the papers of this Board of
Supervisors of Chesterfield County, Virginia.
Ayes: Elswick, Warren, Jaeckle, Holland and Gecker.
Nays: None.
Mr. Gecker presented the executed resolution to Mr. Tuck and
expressed heartfelt gratitude for his exceptional
contributions and many years of service to the Bon Air
community.
Mr. Tuck sincerely thanked Mr. Gecker for the special
recognition and kind sentiments.
15. FIFTEEN -MINUTE CITIZEN COMMENT PERIOD ON UNSCHEDULED
MATTERS
There were no requests to address the Board at this time.
16. REQUESTS FOR MANUFACTURED HOME PERMITS AND REZONING
PLACED ON THE CONSENT AGENDA TO BE HEARD IN THE
FOLLOWING ORDER: - WITHDRAWALS DEFERRALS - CASES WHERE
OPPOSITION - CASES WHERE THE APPLICANT DOES NOT ACCEPT
LL
ircungiA
In Bermuda Magisterial District, Plantation Haven LLC
requests conditional use planned development to permit
exceptions relative to existing additions to manufactured
homes and amendment of zoning district map in Manufactured
Home Park (MH -1) and General Business (C-5) Districts on 7.1
acres fronting 350 feet on the west line of Jefferson Davis
Highway, 175 feet north of Whitehouse Road, also fronting 620
feet on the north line of Whitehouse Road, 285 feet west of
Jefferson Davis Highway. Density will be controlled by zoning
conditions or ordinance standards. The Comprehensive Plan
suggests the property is appropriate for Community Mixed use.
Tax IDs 799-629-0432 and 1049.
Mr. Turner stated Ms. Jaeckle is requesting a deferral to the
January 2016 regularly scheduled meeting.
The applicant was not present.
Mr. Elswick called for public comment.
No one came forward to speak to the deferral.
On motion of Ms. Jaeckle, seconded by Mr. Holland, the Board
deferred Case 15SNO618 until the January 2016 regularly
scheduled meeting.
Ayes: Elswick, Warren, Jaeckle, Holland and Gecker.
Nays: None.
15-985
08/26/15
PE
9
1SGNn197
In Bermuda Magisterial District, James Queen requests renewal
of temporary manufactured home permit (Case 14SN0137) to
permit a temporary manufactured home and amendment of zoning
district map in a Residential (R-7) District on 2.3 acres
known as 15812 Meridian Avenue. Density is approximately .4
unit per acre. The Comprehensive Plan suggests the property
is appropriate for Suburban Residential II use (2.0 to 4.0
dwellings per acre). Tax ID 796-635-1818.
Mr. Turner stated Ms. Jaeckle is requesting a deferral to the
September 16, 2015 regularly scheduled meeting.
The applicant was not present.
Mr. Elswick called for public comment.
No one came forward to speak to the deferral.
On motion of Ms. Jaeckle, seconded by Mr. Gecker, the Board
deferred Case 15SN0167 until September 16, 2015.
Ayes: Elswick, Warren, Jaeckle, Holland and Gecker.
Nays: None.
15SN0634
In Midlothian Magisterial District, Charter (E & A) LLC
requests amendment of conditional use planned development
(Cases 94SN0138 & 13SN0509) to permit exceptions to density
and residential townhouse standards and amendment of zoning
district map in a Community Business (C-3) District on 10.2
acres fronting 700 feet on the west line of Charter Colony
Parkway, 850 feet south of Midlothian Turnpike, also fronting
550 feet on the east line of LeGordon Drive, 1115 feet south
of Midlothian Turnpike. Density will be controlled by zoning
conditions or ordinance standards. The Comprehensive Plan
suggests the property is appropriate for Planned Transition
Area uses. Tax ID 726 -707 -Part of 3592.
Mr. Turner stated Mr. Gecker is requesting a deferral until
the September 16, 2015 regularly scheduled meeting.
Ms. Adena Patterson accepted the deferral on behalf of the
applicant.
Mr. Elswick called for public comment.
No one came forward to speak to the deferral.
On motion of Mr. Gecker, seconded by Mr. Holland, the Board
deferred Case 15SN0634 until September 16, 2015.
Ayes: Elswick, Warren, Jaeckle, Holland and Gecker.
Nays: None.
15-986
08/26/15
15RW0231
In Matoaca Magisterial District, Timothy Menninger, requests
an exception to Section 19.1-524 of the Chesapeake Bay
Preservation Act requirements of the Zoning Ordinance to
permit encroachment into the Resource Protection Area (RPA)
along the Swift Creek Reservoir as a result of grading and
construction of a private in -ground swimming pool. The
property is located at 13716 Beechwood Point Road, which is
within the Swift Creek drainage basin. Tax ID # 725-679-5088.
Mr. Turner presented a summary of Case 15RW0231 and stated
staff recommended approval, subject to the conditions.
Mr. Timothy Menninger accepted the conditions.
Mr. Elswick called for public comment.
There being no one to speak to the issue, the public hearing
was closed.
On motion of Mr. Elswick, seconded by Mr. Holland, the Board
approved Case 15RW0231, subject to the following conditions:
1. The mitigation measures outlined in the document titled
Water Quality Impact Assessment - 13716 Beechwood Point
Road - Midlothian, Virginia, prepared by Timothy and
Ashley Menninger; dated May 23, 2015 shall be
incorporated and implemented during the plan review
process. (EE)
2. The Department of Environmental Engineering may approve
alternative mitigation measures if it is determined that
such alternatives will not increase impacts to the
Resource Protection Area (RPA) or downstream water
bodies. (EE)
3. As mitigation for the encroachment the applicant shall
maintain erosion and sediment control measures as
required by the Department of Environmental Engineering
and ensure preservation of the remaining vegetation.
(EE)
4. Approval of this exception is for encroachment into the
RPA buffer only and does not guarantee development of the
site as explicitly proposed in the WQIA referenced in
Condition 1 above. Development of the site is subject to
all ordinance requirements, review processes, building
permits and/or other requirements currently adopted at
the time of plans review.
Ayes: Elswick, Warren, Jaeckle, Holland and Gecker.
Nays: None.
15-987
08/26/15
9
9
15SN0653
In Midlothian Magisterial District, Yvette Williams -Patterson
requests conditional use to permit a family day-care home and
amendment of zoning district map in a Residential (R-7)
District on .4 acre known as 2109 Ives Lane. Density will be
controlled by zoning conditions or Ordinance standards. The
Comprehensive Plan suggests the property is appropriate for
Residential use (2.51 to 4.0 dwelling units per acre). Tax ID
763-697-8372.
Mr. Turner presented a summary of Case 15SNO653 and stated
both the Planning Commission and staff recommended approval
and acceptance of the proffered conditions.
Ms. Yvette Williams -Patterson accepted the recommendation.
Mr. Elswick called for public comment.
There being no one to speak to the issue, the public hearing
was closed.
On motion of Mr. Gecker, seconded by Ms. Jaeckle, the Board
approved Case 15SNO653 and accepted the following proffered
conditions:
1. Non -Transferable Ownership: This conditional use
approval shall be granted to and for Yvette Williams -
Patterson, exclusively, and shall not be transferable
nor run with the land. (P)
2. Expansion of Use: There shall be no exterior additions
or alterations to the existing structure to accommodate
this use. (P)
3. Signage: There shall be no signs permitted to identify
this use. (P)
4. Number of Children: This conditional use approval shall
be limited to providing care, protection and guidance to
a maximum of 12 children, other than the applicant's own
children, at any one time. (P)
5. Hours of Operation: Hours and days of operation shall be
limited to Monday through Friday from 7 a.m. to 6 p.m.
There shall be no Saturday or Sunday operation of this
use. (P)
6. Time Limitation: This conditional use approval shall be
granted for a period not to exceed 5 years from the date
of approval. (P)
7. Fenced Outdoor Play Areas: Any outdoor play area and/or
recreational equipment utilized by the family day-care
home shall be located in the side or rear yard of the
property. Within 90 days of approval, outdoor play
and/or recreational equipment areas shall have perimeter
fencing of at least four feet in height, installed
around the equipment or play area. Equipment for outdoor
play areas shall be located no closer than fifteen (15)
feet to the side or rear property lines. (P)
8. Employees: No more than one (1) employee shall be
permitted to work on the premises, other than family
member employees that live on the premises. (P)
Ayes: Elswick, Warren, Jaeckle, Holland and Gecker.
Nays: None.
15-988
08/26/15
15SN0654
In Midlothian Magisterial District, Rouse Properties, Inc.
requests amendment of conditional use (Case 12SN0236) to
modify the location of outdoor uses plus a conditional use on
6.7 acres to permit motor vehicle sales and amendment of
zoning district map in Neighborhood Business (C-2), Community
Business (C-3) and Regional Business (C-4) Districts on 75.2
acres located in the southwest quadrant of Koger Center
Boulevard and Mall Drive; also lying on the north line of
Midlothian Turnpike, east of Huguenot Road. Density will be
controlled by zoning conditions or Ordinance standards. The
Comprehensive Plan suggests the property is appropriate for
Regional Mixed use. Tax IDs 741-709-1430 and 741-711-0904.
Mr. Turner presented a summary of Case 15SN0654 and stated
both the Planning Commission and staff recommended approval
and acceptance of the proffered conditions.
Mr. Brian Wall accepted the recommendation.
Mr. Elswick called for public comment.
There being no one to speak to the issue, the public hearing
was closed.
On motion of Mr. Gecker, seconded by Ms. Jaeckle, the Board
approved Case 15SN0654 and accepted the following proffered
conditions:
The Applicant hereby amends Proffered Condition 1 of Case
12SN0236 to read as follows:
1. The areas designated for continuous outside display of
merchandise for sale, commercial outdoor recreational
establishments, carnival, motor vehicle sales, concert,
festival and movie events shall be limited to the areas
shown on Exhibit A, dated June 9, 2015. (P)
(Staff Note: Except as amended with this case, all other
conditions of Case 12SN0236 shall remain in force and
effect.)
2. Motor vehicle sales shall be limited to an outdoor,
temporary sales event. Motor vehicle sales shall be
limited with the following restrictions:
a. These events shall be permitted no more than two (2)
times a year.
b. Each event shall last a period of no longer than
five (5) days.
C. The events shall be spaced at a minimum interval of
thirty (30) days from the last day of the previously
permitted motor vehicle sales event.
d. Motor vehicle sales shall coincide with the general
business hours of the shopping center.
e. No permanent improvements shall be permitted.
f. Motor vehicle sales shall not be permitted from
November 15th to December 30tH (p)
Ayes: Elswick, Warren, Jaeckle, Holland and Gecker.
Nays: None.
15-989
08/26/15
�J
9
9
15SN0659
In Bermuda Magisterial District, Walthall Self Storage Inc.
requests conditional use to permit an electronic message
center sign and amendment of zoning district map in General
Business (C-5) and General Industrial (I-2) Districts on 22.9
acres known as 14324 Jefferson Davis Highway. Density will be
controlled by zoning conditions or Ordinance standards. The
Comprehensive Plan suggests the property is appropriate for
Neighborhood Business and Industrial uses. Tax ID 800-644-
3883.
Mr. Turner presented a summary of Case 15SNO659 and stated
both the Planning Commission and staff recommended approval
and acceptance of the proffered condition.
Mr. Kerry Hutcherson accepted the recommendation.
Mr. Elswick called for public comment.
There being no one to speak to the issue, the public hearing
was closed.
On motion of Ms. Jaeckle, seconded by Mr. Gecker, the Board
approved Case 15SN0659 and accepted the following proffered
condition:
The Applicant in this case, pursuant to Section 15.2-2298 of
the Code of Virginia (1950 as amended) and the Zoning
Ordinance of Chesterfield County, for themselves and their
successors or assigns, proffer that the property known as
Chesterfield County Tax Identification Number 800-644-
3883("the Property") under consideration will be developed
according to the following amended proffers if, and only if,
the request submitted herewith is granted with only those
conditions agreed to by the Applicant. In the event this
request is denied or approved with conditions not agreed to
by the owner and Applicant, the proffer shall immediately be
null and void and of no further force or effect.
We hereby offer the following proffered conditions:
1. In addition to Ordinance requirements any computer -
controlled, variable message, electronic sign shall
conform to the following standards:
a. Copy shall be limited to a maximum of three
(3) lines and shall not move but may fade;
b. The message or display shall be programmed to
change no more than once every thirty (30)
seconds;
C. Sequential messaging shall be prohibited;
d. Flashing and traveling messages shall be
prohibited;
e. Bijou lighting and animation effects shall be
prohibited;
15-990
08/26/15
f. The electronic message center shall be
incorporated into the existing freestanding
sign; and
g. Brightness shall be limited so as not to
exceed 0.3 foot candles above ambient light as
measured using a foot candle meter at a
distance of 50 feet. The sign shall have a
photocell that automatically adjusts the
brightness according to the ambient light
conditions. (P)
Ayes: Elswick, Warren, Jaeckle, Holland and Gecker.
Nays: None.
15SN0660
In Midlothian Magisterial District, East West Hallsley, LLC
requests rezoning from Agricultural (A) to Residential (R-15)
and amendment of zoning district map on 56.2 acres lying 3300
feet off the western terminus of Brightwalton Road, west of
Farnborough Drive. Residential use of up to 2.90 units per
acre is permitted in the Residential (R-15) District. The
Comprehensive Plan suggests the property is appropriate for
Suburban Residential I use (maximum of 2.0 dwellings per
acre). Tax IDs 707 -698 -Part of 7357 and 708 -697 -Part of 2718.
Mr. Turner presented a summary of Case 15SN0660 and stated
both the Planning Commission and staff recommended approval
and acceptance of the proffered condition. He further stated
the applicant submitted a revision to Proffered Condition 5
that revises the cash proffer allocation to capital
facilities. He stated the applicant has proffered to increase
the allocation of the cash proffer payment for the Schools
capital facilities to be the full calculated impact. He
further stated to facilitate this increase, the applicant
would pro -rate a corresponding reduction in the remaining
capital facilities categories.
Mr. Mincks noted the revision was submitted after public
advertisement of the case and the Board must unanimously
agree to suspend their procedures in order to consider the
revised proffered condition.
Mr. Andy Scherzer, representing the applicant, accepted the
recommendation. He noted the revision was made in order to
provide some encouragement to the community.
In response to Mr. Elswick's question, Mr. Turner stated the
applicant submitted a revision to Proffered Condition 5.
Mr. Elswick called for public comment.
Mr. Rodney Martin, Midlothian District resident, voiced his
support of the request. He expressed concerns relative to
school data based on capacity.
There being no one else to speak to the issue, the public
hearing was closed.
15-991
08/26/15
9
9
On motion of Mr. Gecker, seconded by Mr. Warren, the Board
suspended its rules to allow for consideration of the revised
proffered condition.
Ayes: Elswick, Warren, Jaeckle, Holland and Gecker.
Nays: None.
Mr. Gecker then made a motion, seconded by Ms. Jaeckle, for
the Board to approve Case 15SN0660 and accept the following
proffered condition, as amended:
5. Cash Proffer. For each dwelling unit, the applicant,
sub -divider, or assignee(s) shall pay the following to
the County of Chesterfield, prior to the issuance of a
building permit for infrastructure improvements within
the cash proffer service district for the property,
unless state law prevents enforcement of that timing:
A. $18,966.00 per dwelling unit for the period
beginning the July 1 preceding the Board of
Supervisors' approval of the case through July 1
four years later, at which point the amount will be
adjusted for the cumulative change in the Marshall
and Swift Building Cost Index during that time
period. The $18,966 will be allocated pro -rata
among the facility costs as follows: $9,648.00 for
schools, $911.00 for parks and recreation, $215.00
for library facilities, $7,609.00 for roads, and
$583.00 for fire stations.
B. Thereafter, the per dwelling unit cash proffer
amount shall be automatically adjusted, annually,
by the annual change in the Marshall and Swift
Building Cost Index on July 1 of each year.
C. Cash proffer payments shall be spent for the
purposes proffered or as otherwise permitted by
law.
D. Should Chesterfield County impose impact fees at
any time during the life of the development that
are applicable to the Property, the amount paid in
cash proffers shall be in lieu of or credited
toward, but not be in addition to, any impact fees
in a manner determined by the County.
Ayes: Elswick, Warren, Jaeckle, Holland and Gecker.
Nays: None.
15SN0663
In Bermuda Magisterial District, Henry D. Moore requests
rezoning from Residential (R-25) to Neighborhood Office (0-1)
and amendment of zoning district map on 8.3 acres fronting
430 feet on the east line of Ashton Dell Road, 260 feet south
of West Hundred Road; also fronting 250 feet on the south
line of West Hundred Road, 440 feet east of Ashton Dell Road.
Density will be controlled by zoning conditions or Ordinance
standards. The Comprehensive Plan suggests the property is
appropriate for Residential use (1.5 dwellings per acre or
less). Tax ID 785 -651 -Part of 1484.
15-992
08/26/15
Mr. Turner presented a summary of Case 15SN0663 and stated
both the Planning Commission and staff recommended approval
and acceptance of the proffered conditions.
Mr. Henry Moore accepted the recommendation.
Mr. Elswick called for public comment.
There being no one to speak to the issue, the public hearing
was closed.
On motion of Ms. Jaeckle, seconded by Mr. Gecker, the Board
approved Case 15SN0663 and accepted the following proffered
conditions:
1. No direct vehicular access shall be provided from the
property to West Hundred Road. (T)
2. Permitted uses shall be limited to the following:
a) Nursery schools and child or adult day care centers
b) Offices
c) Church and/or Sunday schools (P)
Ayes: Elswick, Warren, Jaeckle, Holland and Gecker.
Nays: None.
In Midlothian Magisterial District, Jay Hanky requests
rezoning from Agricultural (A) to Light Industrial (I-1) plus
conditional use planned development to permit exceptions to
ordinance requirements and amendment of zoning district map
on 2.7 acres fronting 480 feet on the north line of
Midlothian Turnpike, 670 feet west of Old Otterdale Road.
Density will be controlled by zoning conditions or Ordinance
standards. The Comprehensive Plan suggests the property is
appropriate for Suburban Commercial District use. Tax IDs
723-709-1226 and 3529.
Mr. Turner presented a summary of Case 15SN0666 and stated
both the Planning Commission and staff recommended approval
and acceptance of the proffered conditions.
Mr. Mike Hanky accepted the recommendation.
Mr. Elswick called for public comment.
There being no one to speak to the issue, the public hearing
was closed.
On motion of Mr. Gecker, seconded by Ms. Jaeckle, the Board
approved Case 15SN0666 and accepted the following proffered
conditions:
1. Master Plan: The Textual Statement last revised June
24, 2015; Exhibit A entitled Concept Plan, prepared by
The Bay Companies, Inc. and dated May 4, 2015; and,
Exhibit B entitled Midlothian Storage Center, prepared
by GMF + Associates and dated June 26, 2015; and,
Exhibit C entitled Midlothian Storage Center, prepared
by GMF + Associates and dated July 2, 2015 shall be
considered the master plan. (P)
15-993
08/26/15
9
91
1E
2. Uses:
A. An indoor self -storage warehouse shall be
permitted.
B. Outside storage shall not be permitted. (P)
3. Site Plan: The site shall be developed as generally
depicted on Exhibit A, unless modifications are approved
by the Planning Director at the time of site plan
approval. ( P )
4. Internal Access: Access to individual self -storage
units shall only be permitted using interior doors.
This does not preclude exterior loading areas on the
north and eastern elevations consistent with Exhibit A.
(P)
5. Architecture and Materials: Any building shall be
constructed in compliance with the following:
A. Exterior Elevations: Buildings shall have an
architectural style and use design elements
substantially consistent with the architectural
renderings labeled Exhibit B and Exhibit C.
B. Building Materials: The exposed portions of the
front and side elevations, as depicted on Exhibit
B and C, shall be constructed of brick, masonry
split -faced block, E.F.I.S. and metal wall panels
or equivalent permanent architecturally finished
materials, substantially consistent with those
shown on the exhibits. (P)
6. Access: Direct vehicular access from the property to
Midlothian Turnpike (Route 60) shall be limited to one
(1) entrance/exit, generally located towards the eastern
property line, and shall be limited to right -turns -in
and right -turns -out only. The exact location of this
access shall be approved by the Transportation
Department. (T)
7. Road Improvements: Prior to issuance of any occupancy
permit, the following road improvements shall be
completed, as determined by the Transportation of
Department
A. Construction of additional pavement along the
westbound lane of Route 60 at the approved access
to provide a right turn lane and a pavement taper
on the west side of the approved access. The full
width of the right turn lane shall extend to the
access that serves the adjacent property to the
east (GPIN 723-709-6425). The exact length of
these improvements shall be approved by the
Transportation Department.
B. Dedication to and for the benefit of Chesterfield
County, free and unrestricted of any additional
right of way or easements required for the
improvements identified above. In the event the
developer is unable to acquire the "off-site"
right-of-way that is necessary for the road
15-994
08/26/15
improvements described above, the developer may
request, in writing, that the county acquire such
right-of-way as a public road improvement. All
costs associated with the acquisition of the right-
of-way shall be borne by the developer. In the
event the county chooses not to assist the
developer in acquisition of the "off-site" right-
of-way, the developer shall be relieved of the
obligation to acquire the "off-site" right-of-way
and shall provide the road improvements within
available right-of-way, as determined by the
Transportation Department. (T)
8. Hours of Operation: Hours of operation shall be limited
to between 6:00 a.m. and 10:00 p.m. daily. (P)
9. Burning Ban: The developer shall not use burning to
clear or timber the subject property. (EE)
10. Dedication: Prior to any site plan approval or within
ninety (90) days of a written request by the
Transportation Department, whichever occurs first,
right-of-way to accommodate an additional lane of
pavement along the westbound lanes of Route 60 for the
entire property frontage shall be dedicated, free and
unrestricted, to and for the benefit of Chesterfield
County. The exact dimensions of the right-of-way shall
be approved by the Transportation Department. (T)
Textual Statement
The maximum permitted height for any building shall be
four (4) stories or sixty (60) feet. (P)
Ayes: Elswick, Warren, Jaeckle, Holland and Gecker.
Nays: None.
16CW0103
In Bermuda Magisterial District, Colony Village, LLC,
requests an exception to Section 19.1-524 of the Chesapeake
Bay Preservation Act requirements of the Zoning Ordinance to
permit encroachment into the Resource Protection Area (RPA)
buffer along an unnamed tributary to Proctors Creek as a
result of grading and construction related to parking and
associated appurtenances required for Colony Village Phase
II. The property is located at 10250 Colony Village Way &
10220 Jefferson Davis Highway, which is within the Proctors
Creek drainage basin. Tax ID 794-666 part of 6719 & 794-665
part of 8176.
Mr. Turner presented a summary of Case 16CW0103 and stated
staff recommended approval, subject to the conditions.
Mr. Kerry Hutcherson accepted the recommendation.
Mr. Elswick called for public comment.
There being no one to speak to the issue, the public hearing
was closed.
15-995
08/26/15
9
9
PE
On motion of Ms. Jaeckle, seconded by Mr. Gecker, the Board
approved Case 16CW0103, subject to the following conditions:
1. The mitigation measures outlined in the document titled
Colony Village Apartments Phase II - Major Water Quality
Impact Assessment, prepared by Highmark Engineering, LLC
last revised August 14, 2015 shall be incorporated and
implemented during the plan review process. (EE)
2. The Department of Environmental Engineering may approve
alternative mitigation measures if it is determined that
such alternatives will not increase impacts to the
Resource Protection Area (RPA) or downstream water
bodies. (EE)
3. The applicant shall maintain erosion and sediment
control measures as required by the Department of
Environmental Engineering and ensure preservation of the
remaining vegetation. (EE)
4. Approval of this exception is for encroachment into the
RPA buffer only and does not guarantee development of
the site as explicitly proposed in the WQIA referenced
in Condition 1 above. Development of the site is subject
to all ordinance requirements, review processes,
building permits and/or other requirements currently
adopted at the time of plans review. (EE)
Ayes: Elswick, Warren, Jaeckle, Holland and Gecker.
Nays: None.
15SN0652
In Midlothian Magisterial District, JMS Investments, LLC and
J. Mark Sowers request rezoning from Agricultural (A) to
Residential (R-25) and to permit an exception to Section 18-
60 of the Utility Ordinance for the required public sewer
connection and amendment of zoning district map on 48.7 acres
fronting 825 feet on the west line of Huguenot Springs Road,
330 feet south of Dragonnade Trail. Residential use of up to
1.74 units per acre is permitted in the Residential (R-25)
District. The Comprehensive Plan suggests the property is
appropriate for Corporate Office/Research and Development/
Light Industrial uses. Tax IDs 709 -712 -Part of 8039; 710-713-
3304; 711-712-3380; 711-713-3010; 712-712-2485 and 4599.
Mr. Turner presented a summary of Case 15SN0652 and stated
the Planning Commission recommends approval of the request
because the planned residential use is compatible with
existing area development and sewer easements will facilitate
future connection to the system. He further stated staff
recommends denial of the request because it does not comply
with the Comprehensive Plan, a private system will encourage
future area development that is inconsistent with the
Comprehensive Plan and the extension of a public sewer system
to area properties will be adversely impacted. He stated the
applicant submitted a modified proffered condition that
revises the cash proffer allocation to capital facilities.
The applicant has proffered to increase the allocation of the
cash proffer payment for the Schools capital facilities to
the full calculated impact. He noted a revision to the
proffered condition was submitted after public advertisement
of the case and the Board must unanimously agree to suspend
their procedures in order to consider this revised proffered
condition.
15-996
08/26/15
Mr. Andy Scherzer, representing the applicant, stated the
single-family residential subdivision being planned is in an
unusual geographical position with very strong slopes. He
further stated the proposed residential development is
compatible with an adjacent existing residential subdivision.
He stated the conditions will require the layout of public
sewer easements to facilitate a connection when the system is
available.
Mr. Elswick called for public comment.
There being no one to speak to the issue, the public hearing
was closed.
Mr. Gecker stated he certainly understands why staff has
recommended denial of the request; however, he believes
placing residential in the proposed location is the right
answer.
Mr. Gecker then made a motion, seconded by Mr. Warren, for
the Board to suspend its rules to allow for consideration of
the revised proffered condition.
Ayes: Elswick, Warren, Jaeckle, Holland and Gecker.
Nays: None.
On motion of Mr. Gecker, seconded by Ms. Jaeckle, the Board
approved Case 15SN0652 and accepted the following proffered
conditions, as amended:
1. Utilities. This development shall utilize public water.
(U)
2. Utility Easements. The record plat shall provide for
public sewer easements in locations acceptable to the
Department of Utilities to accommodate the future
extension of public sewer. (U)
3. Dedication. In conjunction with recordation of the
initial subdivision plat or within sixty (60) days from
a written request by the Transportation Department,
whichever occurs first, forty-five (45) feet of right-
of-way along the west side of Huguenot Springs Road,
measured from the centerline of that part of Huguenot
Springs Road immediately adjacent to the property, shall
be dedicated, free and unrestricted, to and for the
benefit of Chesterfield County. (T)
4. Access.
a. Direct vehicular access from the property to
Huguenot Springs Road shall be limited to one (1)
public road. The exact location of this access
shall be approved by the Transportation Department.
b. No stub road right of way shall be recorded to the
westernmost property line, unless adequate
information is provided to the county regarding the
potential development of properties further to the
west (i.e., properties within Powhatan County) and
development of those properties would not result in
a violation of the Subdivision Ordinance on the
property. (P, FD &T)
15-997
08/26/15
19
19
19
5. Road Improvements. In conjunction with initial
development of the property, additional pavement shall
be constructed along Huguenot Springs Road at the
approved access to provide left and right turn lanes.
Any additional right-of-way (or easements) required for
these improvements shall be dedicated, free and
unrestricted, to and for the benefit of Chesterfield
County. (T)
6. Cash Proffers. For each dwelling unit, the applicant,
sub -divider, or assignee(s) shall pay the following to
the County of Chesterfield, prior to the issuance of a
building permit for infrastructure improvements within
the cash proffer service district for the property,
unless state law prevents enforcement of that timing:
a. $18,966 per dwelling unit for the period beginning
the July 1 preceding the Board of Supervisors,
approval of the case through July 1 four (4) years
later, at which point the amount will be adjusted
for the cumulate change in the Marshall and Swift
Building Cost index during that time period.
The $18,966 will be allocated pro -rata among the
facility costs as follows: $9,648.00 for schools,
$911.00 for parks and recreation, $215.00 for
library facilities, $7,609.00 for roads, and
$583.00 for fire stations.
b. Thereafter, the per dwelling unit cash proffer
amount shall be automatically adjusted, annually,
by the annual change in the Marshall and Swift
Building Cost Index on July 1 of each year.
C. Cash proffer payments shall be spent for the
purposes proffered or as otherwise permitted by
law. (BM)
7. Density. The density of this development shall not
exceed one (1) dwelling unit per acre. (P)
8. Architectural/Design Elements.
a. Sidewalks/Driveways
i. Driveways: All portions of driveways and
parking areas shall be hardscaped (concrete,
asphalt or decorative pavers).
ii. Front Walks: A minimum of a four (4) foot
wide hardscaped (concrete or decorative
pavers) front walk shall be provided to each
dwelling unit.
b. Landscaping and Yards
i. Supplemental Trees: Prior to the issuance of
a Certificate of Occupancy for each dwelling
unit, a minimum of one (1) flowering tree
15-998
08/26/15
c.
shall be planted in each front yard. At the
time of planting, these supplemental trees
shall have a minimum caliper of 2" measured at
breast height (4' 10" above.ground).
ii. Front Foundation Planting Beds: Foundation
planting is required along the entire front
fagade of all units, and shall extend along
all sides facing a street. Foundation Planting
Beds shall be a minimum of 4' wide from the
unit foundation. Planting beds shall be
defined with a trenched edge or suitable
landscape edging material. Planting beds shall
include medium shrubs and may also include
spreading groundcovers.
Architecture and Materials
i. Repetition: Dwellings with the same elevations
may not be located adjacent to, directly
across from, or diagonally across from each
other on the same street. This requirement
does not apply to units on different streets
backing up to each other.
ii. Foundations: The exposed portion of any
foundation shall be brick or stone. Synthetic
or natural stucco foundations may be permitted
for fagades constructed entirely of stucco.
Rear walkout basement walls shall be permitted
to be sided or cast concrete painted to match
house.
Exterior Facades: Acceptable siding materials
include brick, stone, masonry, stucco,
synthetic stucco (E.I.F.S), and horizontal lap
siding. Horizontal lap siding may be permitted
to be manufactured from natural wood or cement
fiber board or may be premium quality vinyl
siding. Plywood and metal siding are not
permitted. Additional siding requirements:
1. Where a dwelling borders more than one
street, all street -facing facades shall
be finished in the same materials.
2. Cementitious and vinyl siding is
permitted in traditional wide beaded
styles only, unless otherwise approved by
the Architectural Board for special
design conditions. Premium quality vinyl
is defined as vinyl siding with a minimum
wall thickness of .044".
3. Synthetic Stucco (E.I.F.S.) siding shall
be finished in smooth, sand or level
texture. Rough textures are not
permitted.
15-999
08/26/15
9
MI
D
10
d. Roof Material: Roofing material shall be
dimensional architectural shingles or better with a
minimum 30 year warranty.
e. Porches, Stoops and Decks
i. Front Porches: All front entry stoops and
front porches shall be constructed with
continuous masonry foundation wall or on
12"x12" masonry piers. Extended front porches
shall be a minimum of five (5)' deep. Space
between piers under porches shall be enclosed
with framed lattice panels. Handrails and
railings shall be finished painted wood or
metal railing with vertical pickets or swan
balusters. Pickets shall be supported on top
and bottom rails that span between columns.
Minimum House Size. The minimum gross floor area for
each dwelling unit shall be 2,400 square feet. (P)
Restrictive Covenants. The following restrictive
covenants shall be recorded in conjunction with the
recordation of any subdivision plat or prior to any site
plan approval, whichever occurs first:
(It is important to note that the County will only
ensure the recordation of the covenants and will not be
responsible for their enforcement.)
a. Design Guidelines - A Design Guidelines Manual
shall be created and shall include but not be
limited to the following development criteria:
i. Architectural controls
ii. Garage locations
iii. Recreational amenities
iv. Mailboxes
V. Street and External Lighting
vi. Street Trees
vii. Landscaping
viii. Streetscapes
ix. Fencing
X. Building locations / Yard Requirements
Xi. Driveways
b. Architectural Board - The Architectural Board shall
have exclusive jurisdiction over all original
construction, modifications, additions or
alterations made on or to all existing
improvements, and the open space, if any,
appurtenant thereto on all property. It shall
prepare and, on behalf of the Board of Directors,
shall promulgate application and review procedures,
all as part of the design and developmental
standards. The Architectural Board shall
incorporate the "Design Standards Manual", as
described below in its review and approval of all
applications submitted. Copies of the "Design
15-1000
08/26/15
Guidelines Manual" shall be available from the
Architectural Board for review and use by owners,
builders and/or developers. The guidelines and
procedures shall be those of the Association, and
the Architectural Board shall have sole and full
authority to prepare and to amend the standards
available to owners, builders, and developers only
under extreme circumstances or hardships. Such
circumstances or hardships shall be clearly
demonstrated to be considered for amendment. The
Architectural Board shall initially consist of
three (3) members, all appointed by the Declarant.
At such time as one hundred percent (1006) of all
property has been developed, improved, and conveyed
to purchasers in the normal course of development
and sale, the Board of Directors shall appoint all
members of the Architectural Board. At no time
shall the Architectural Board have fewer than three
members nor more than five (5) members. The
Declarant may, at his option, delegate to the Board
of Directors its right to appoint one or more
members of the Architectural Board. At all times,
at least one (1) member of the Architectural Board
shall be a member of the Association. It is
intended for the Architectural Board to maintain
the character and integrity of the development.
c. Signs - No signs shall be erected or maintained on
any residential property by anyone including, but
not limited to, the owner, a contractor, or a
subcontractor, except as provided for in the
"Development Guidelines Manual" or except as may be
required by legal proceedings. Residential property
identification and like signs not exceeding a
combined total of more than one (1) square foot may
be erected without the written permission of the
Declarant or the Association. Realtor signs "For
Sale" may be erected and are subject to review of
the Declarant or Architectural Board.
d. Condition of Ground - It shall be the
responsibility of each property owner and tenant to
prevent the development of any unclean, unsightly,
or unkempt conditions of buildings or grounds on
his lot. All improvements on each lot shall be kept
in good repair, and where necessary, painted in a
regular basis. No portion of the property shall be
used or maintained as a dumping ground for rubbish.
Outdoor burning of leaves, trash, or other debris
shall not be permitted. All trash, garbage, and
other waste shall be kept in sanitary containers,
which shall be surrounded by a wood or vinyl screen
with such screening to be approved by the ARC, or
otherwise out of sight from the street.
e. Residential Use
- All lots shall
residential purposes exclusively.
portion of a dwelling on a lot as ar
owner or tenants thereof shall be
15-1001
be used for
The use of a
1 office by the
considered a
08/26/15
PE
9
residential use if such use does not create
customer or client traffic to and from the lot. No
structure, except as herein after provided, shall
be erected, altered, placed, or permitted to remain
on any lot other than one (1) detached single
family dwelling and one (1) accessory building
which may include a detached private garage,
provided the use of such accessory building does
not overcrowd the side and provided further that
such building is not used for any activity normally
conducted as business. Such accessory building may
not be constructed prior to the construction of the
main building and approved by the Board.
i. The provisions of this paragraph shall not
prohibit the Developer from using a house as a
model as provided in this Declaration.
f. Enforcement - The Board of Directors reserves the
right to correct any situation, on any lot that
violates the deed restrictions herein. The Board
shall provide written notice to the owner in
violation a minimum of thirty (30) days prior to
any action to be taken by the Board. The Board
shall have the right to correct the violation and
collect reimbursement from the owner of the lot
requiring action. If payment is not made or
arranged for within thirty (30) days of the Boards
request, the Board reserves the right to place a
lien on said property or take any appropriate legal
action necessary. (P)
Ayes: Elswick, Warren, Jaeckle, Holland and Gecker.
Nays: None.
15SNn655
In Matoaca Magisterial District, Dana M. Phinney requests
conditional use to permit a group care facility incidental to
a dwelling and amendment of zoning district map in an
Agricultural (A) District on 2.5 acres known as 9201
Winterpock Road. Density will be controlled by zoning
conditions or Ordinance standards. The Comprehensive Plan
suggests the property is appropriate for Suburban Residential
I use (maximum of 2.0 dwellings per acre). Tax ID 722-663-
7221.
Mr. Turner presented a summary of Case 15SN0655 and stated
the Planning Commission recommended approval of the request
because the use is compatible with existing development and
conditions will minimize impacts on adjacent properties. He
further stated staff recommended denial of the request
because it does not comply with the Comprehensive Plan, the
use is not compatible with existing and anticipated
development and may set a precedent for future similar
requests.
Ms. Dana M. Phinney accepted the recommendation.
Mr. Elswick called for public comment.
15-1002
08/26/15
There being no one to speak to the issue, the public hearing
was closed.
Mr. Elswick expressed his appreciation to the applicant for
offering to care for senior citizens in her home.
Mr. Elswick then made a motion, seconded by Mr. Warren, for
the Board to approve Case 15SN0655 and accept the proffered
conditions.
Ms. Jaeckle recommended having staff review the zoning
ordinance relative to criteria for adult day care homes in
residential areas.
Mr. Holland concurred with Ms. Jaeckle's request and stressed
the importance of accommodating senior citizens.
Mr. Elswick called for a vote on his motion, seconded by Mr.
Warren, for the Board to approve Case 15SN0655 and accept the
following proffered conditions:
1. Non -Transferable Ownership: This conditional use
approval shall be granted to and for Dana Phinney,
exclusively, and shall not be transferable nor run with
the land. (P)
2. Group Care Facility Residents: This conditional use
approval shall be limited to providing group care
services to a maximum of three ( 3 ) adults who reside on
the premises. Any resident receiving group care services
on the subject property shall be a minimum of sixty-two
(62) years of age. (P)
3. Expansion of Use: There shall be no exterior additions
or alterations to the existing structure to accommodate
this use, except alterations to meet Americans with
Disabilities Act (ADA), building code requirements, or
regulatory requirements pertaining to the operation of a
group care facility and the residents receiving group
care in the dwelling. (P)
4. Signage: One (1) sign shall be permitted to identify the
group care facility use. The sign shall not exceed four
(4) square feet in area and three (3) feet in height.
The sign shall not be illuminated. (P)
5. Time Limitation: This conditional use approval shall be
granted for a period not to exceed three (3) years from
the date of approval. (P)
G. Employees: No more than one (1) employee shall be
permitted to work on the premises, other than family
member employees that live on the premises. (P)
Ayes: Elswick, Warren, Jaeckle, Holland and Gecker.
Nays: None.
15-1003
08/26/15
9
15SN0664
In Midlothian Magisterial District, Lee M. Singleton requests
conditional use to permit a contractor's shop and storage
yard (tree service business) and amendment of zoning district
map in an Agricultural (A) District on 2.9 acres known as 901
Ruthers Road. Density will be controlled by zoning conditions
or Ordinance standards. The Comprehensive Plan suggests the
property is appropriate for Residential use (2.51 to 4.0
dwellings units per acre). Tax ID 761-702-9265.
Mr. Turner presented a summary of Case 15SN0664 and stated
the Planning Commission recommended approval of the request
because the conditions will minimize impacts on adjacent
properties. He further stated staff recommended denial of the
request because the request does not comply with the
Comprehensive Plan and the use represents commercial
encroachment within a residential neighborhood.
Mr. Lee M. Singleton accepted the recommendation.
In response to Mr. Decker's question, Mr. Singleton stated he
will be moving his service business once an appropriate
location becomes available.
Mr. Elswick called for public comment.
There being no one to speak to the issue, the public hearing
was closed.
Mr. Gecker stated given the one-year limitation to allow an
established business to move, the request is appropriate.
Mr. Gecker then made a motion, seconded by Ms. Jaeckle, for
the Board to approve Case 15SN0664 and accept the following
proffered conditions:
1. Non -Transferable Ownership: This Conditional Use approval
shall be granted exclusively to Lee Singleton, and shall
not be transferable with the land. (P)
2. Use: This Conditional Use approval shall be for the
operation of a contractor's office and storage yard (tree
service business). (P)
3. Time Limitation: This Conditional Use approval shall be
granted for a period not to exceed one (1) year from the
date of approval. (P)
4. Equipment Storage: As a part of this business, the
following equipment may be stored on the property:
A. Five (5) service trucks
B. One (1) trailer
C. Two (2) tractors No other equipment or materials may
be stored on the property for this use. (P)
5. Location of Use: The use shall be confined to the
existing dwelling, accessory buildings and the storage
areas noted on Exhibit A, dated June 10, 2015. (P)
15-1004
08/26/15
6. Screening: A privacy fence, as shown on Exhibit A, shall
be installed within ninety (90) days of approval. The
fence shall be a minimum of six (6) feet tall, located
within the side yard of the contractor's office, and be
constructed as a wooden board -on -board fence. (P)
7. Employees and Clients: No more than seven (7) employees
shall be permitted to work on the premises. No clients
shall be permitted on the property. (P)
8. Signage: There shall be no signs identifying this use.
(P)
9. Hours of Operation: The contractor's office and storage
yard (tree service business), to include the movement of
equipment, shall be limited to Monday through Friday from
7:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. (P)
Ayes: Elswick, Warren, Jaeckle, Holland and Gecker.
Nays: None.
14SNO559
(AMENDED) In Bermuda Magisterial District, Carrie E. Coyner,
Trustee requests conditional use to permit mining operations
on 50 acres plus conditional use planned development for an
exception to bonding requirements and amendment of zoning
district map on a 348.7 acre tract zoned General Industrial
(I-2) located in the northeast corner of Ashton Park Drive
and Ruffin Mill Road. Density will be controlled by zoning
conditions or ordinance standards. The Comprehensive Plan
suggests the property is appropriate for Industrial use. Tax
ID 813 -639 -Part of 2566 and 815-639-1193.
Ms. Darla Orr presented a summary of Case 14SNO559 and stated
both the Planning Commission and staff recommended approval
and acceptance of the proffered conditions.
Mr. Kerry Hutcherson, representing the applicant, accepted
the recommendation. He stated the developer plans to mine the
proposed area that would eventually serve as a marina for
mixed-use development. He clarified misinformation relative
to the use and stated industrial uses are consistent with the
Comprehensive Plan; traffic on Ruffin Mill Road is an
existing issue and the site plan review process would address
issues raised regarding RPA protection and operational plans.
To address concerns of area citizens, he stated conditions
limit hours of operation on weekdays, with no Sunday
operation permitted and prohibits the use of explosives in
any blasting/mining operations to excavate, break down or
remove product from the property.
Mr. Elswick called for public comment.
There being no one to speak to the issue, the public hearing
was closed.
Ms. Jaeckle stated the applicant and Planning staff worked
very hard to address citizen concerns relative to the case.
15-1005
08/26/15
PE
9
9
Ms. Jaeckle then made a motion, seconded by Mr. Warren, for
the Board to approve Case 14SNO559 and accept the following
proffered conditions:
The Applicant in this case, pursuant to Section 15.2-2298 of
the Code of Virginia (1950 as amended) and the Zoning
ordinance of Chesterfield County, for themselves and their
successors or assigns, proffer that the properties known as
Chesterfield County Tax Identification Number 813-639-2566
and 815-639-1193 ("the Property") under consideration will be
developed according to the following proffers if, and only
if, the request submitted herewith is granted with only those
conditions agreed to by the Applicant. In the event this
request is denied or approved with conditions not agreed to
by the owner and Applicant, the proffer shall immediately be
null and void and of no further force or effect.
1. Transportation of Product. There shall be no
transporting or delivery of any product excavated
from this site to any property in Chesterfield
County unless a land disturbance permit has been
issued for such property. This provision shall not
apply when product excavated from this site is
transported to a permitted operational industrial
facility where such product is a component of the
manufacturing process/product. (EE)
2. Resource Protection Area. Prior to issuance of site
plan approval, the developer shall obtain approval
from the Environmental Engineering Department of a
Resource Protection Area Determination (RPAD) and
shall permit the County to inspect the property to
confirm that the RPA has been properly cordoned off
to avoid disturbance of the RPA by the mining
activities, as determined by the Environmental
Engineering Department. (EE)
3. County Access. The County shall have the authority
to enter the property to monitor on-site activities
as permitted by the property owner and as allowed
by law. (EE)
4. Permitting. Prior to issuance of site plan
approval, the developer shall provide a copy of the
plan and permit approved by the Department of Mines
and Minerals for the mining operations. (EE)
5. Traffic Control Signage. Prior to commencing any
mining operations, the developer shall install
signage to prohibit truck traffic on northbound
Ruffin Mill Road. The exact location, quantity and
design of the signage shall be approved by the
Transportation Department and Virginia Department
of Transportation, if applicable. The developer
shall maintain the signage until all mining
operations on the property have ceased. (T)
15-1006
08/26/15
6. Hours of Operation. The hours of operation shall be
limited to Monday through Friday from 7 a.m. to 6
p.m., and Saturdays from 8 a.m. to 5 p.m. No Sunday
operation shall be permitted. (P)
7. Textual Statement. The textual statement dated
March 18, 2014 shall be considered the master
document for the requested exception to Ordinance
requirements. (P)
8. Protection of Waterways and Wetlands. Prior to the
issuance of site plan approval, the developer shall
provide a copy of the Army Corps of Engineers and
Department of Environmental Quality documentation
necessary for the release of their respective
permits. There shall be no mining in any areas
identified as Wetlands. (EE)
9. Land Disturbance. No land disturbing activities
pertaining to this conditional use shall be
performed on the property unless and until the
Department of Mines and Minerals permit has been
issued on the property. (EE)
10. Blasting Restriction. The use of explosives shall
not be permitted in any blasting/mining operations
to excavate, break down or remove product from the
property. (EE)
11. Time Limit. This Conditional Use shall be granted
for a period of ten (10) years from the date the
site plan is approved by the County. (P)
12. Use Limitation. This conditional use shall be
granted to and for operation by Goodrich River
Trust or by George P. Emerson Jr. or any business
entity for which he is a controlling member. This
conditional use shall not be transferrable or run
with the land. (P)
13. Maximum Area. Mining shall be permitted on a
maximum of fifty (50) acres within the limits of
the area identified as "Mining Area" on Exhibit A,
prepared by Highmark Engineering and dated July 11,
2014. For the purposes of this condition, mining
shall be defined as the breaking or disturbing of
the surface soil or rock in order to facilitate or
accomplish the extraction or removal of minerals.
(P)
14SN0559
TEXTUAL STATEMENT
Carrie E. Coyner Trustee
March 18, 2014
Re: Zoning Application for Carrie E. Coyner Trustee to
request a Conditional Use Planned Development to request
exceptions to ordinance standards relative to use
15-1007
08/26/15
9
F!
9
restrictions on Chesterfield County Tax Identification
Number 813-639-2566 as set forth hereinbelow.
1. The director of planning shall determine that the
site plan and the plan of operations adequately
address the requirements for the restoration of the
land to a safe, stable and usable condition. Bonding
for any or all restoration measures required by the
site plan and plan of operations that is provided to
the Department of Mines and Minerals (DMME) shall
allow the director of planning to waive the
requirement for a separate surety to the county for
those measures covered under the bond to the DMME.
Surety for any restoration measures not covered by
bonding to DMME shall be provided to the county prior
to site plan approval.
Ayes: Elswick, Warren, Jaeckle, Holland and Gecker.
Nays: None.
15SN0665
In Dale Magisterial District, request of Henry E. Myers, Jr.
for rezoning from Agricultural (A) to Community Business (C-
3) and amendment of zoning district map on .8 acre located in
the northeast corner of Iron Bridge Road and Frith Lane.
Density will be controlled by zoning conditions or Ordinance
standards. The Comprehensive Plan suggests the property is
appropriate for Corporate Office use. Tax ID 769 -663 -Part of
9114.
Mr. Ryan Ramsey presented a summary of Case 15SN0665 and
stated a commercial development is planned for the request
property as well as the remainder of the parent parcel that
is located to the north which is owned by the applicant and
zoned Community Business (C-3). He further stated both the
Planning Commission and staff recommended denial of the
request because it does not comply with the Comprehensive
Plan; does not address possible impacts of use on area
development; and is incompatible with area office and
residential development.
Mr. Henry Myers stated he purchased the property sixty years
ago and had it zoned to A and B-2 close to fifty years ago.
He further stated he has elected to pursue rezoning
independent of the remainder of the parent parcel. He stated
the parcel needs to be rezoned to permit Neighborhood
Business uses.
Mr. Elswick called for public comment.
Mr. Ben Myers, son of Henry Myers and part owner of the
subject property, voiced his approval of the rezoning
request. He stated the proposed use compliments what is
already zoned for the parent property. He further stated
architectural standards will be maintained within the
colonial corridor.
There being no one else to speak to the issue,. the public
hearing was closed.
15-1008
08/26/15
Mr. Holland stressed the importance of continuing to improve
the proposed area of the Dale District, central to the
county's government complex. He stated the Dale District is
blessed with outstanding facilities and the very best
architectural standards. He expressed concerns relative to
existing vacancies for retail property along Route 10. He
stated he cannot support the case as presented this evening;
however, he stated he is willing to work with the applicant
to generate the best use for the property. He then
recommended deferring the case for 60 days.
Mr. Henry Myers requested the opinions of other Board members
in order to reach a decent conclusion. He noted he would not
develop the property in any way that would be detrimental to
the county.
Mr. Holland stressed the importance of leaving a legacy for
future generations for the best use of the proposed area.
Mr. Holland then made a motion, seconded by Mr. Warren, for
the Board to defer Case 15SN0665 until October 28, 2015.
Mr. Warren pledged to work with Mr. Holland and stated the
applicant deserves a use that will be compatible to the area.
In response to Ms. Jaeckle's question, Mr. Ramsey stated
commitments to provide mitigating road improvements for the
anticipated traffic impact have not been offered by the
applicant.
In response to Mr. Gecker's question, Mr. Ramsey stated the
Comprehensive Plan suggests Corporate Office uses are
adequate for the request property.
In response to Mr. Gecker's questions, Mr. Turner stated the
proposed zoning is too intense for the location. He further
stated Planning staff is willing to work with the Myers
family to give them uses on the property that will be more
intense for office use; however, proffered conditions would
be needed in order to address possible adverse impacts on
area properties. He stated the applicant believes he would be
able to develop a gasoline station on an adjacent portion of
the property currently zoned commercial and that would comply
with the county ordinance.
Mr. Gecker stated he believes the 60 -day deferral would be a
valuable time for the applicant and staff to work through the
process in order to come up with some solutions.
Ms. Jaeckle stated there is a lot of old zoning along the
Jefferson Davis Highway, and usually applicants proffer out
some of the undesirable uses that would not be appropriate in
those locations today.
Mr. Gecker stated it would be difficult to zone the proposed
property to allow a gas station to be developed.
Mr. Ben Myers clarified a gas station would not be developed
on the request property. He stated the intention is to expand
the location for other reasons. In regards to transportation
and environmental concerns, he stated a site plan has already
addressed those impacts.
15-1009
08/26/15
9
9
9
Mr. Mincks noted rezoning of the parent parcel in conjunction
to the proposed request would need to be remanded back to the
Planning Commission.
Ms. Jaeckle inquired whether a remand back to the Planning
Commission would be a better option for the applicant.
In response to Ms. Jaeckle's inquiry, Mr. Holland stated the
applicant is concerned with the amount of time a remand would
require. He noted the applicant prefers a deferral.
Mr. Elswick stated the will of the Board is for staff to work
diligently with the applicant to determine an appropriate use
of the property.
Mr. Elswick then called for the vote on Mr. Holland's motion,
seconded by Mr. Warren, for the Board to defer Case 15SNO665
until October 28, 2015.
Ayes: Elswick, Warren, Jaeckle, Holland and Gecker.
Nays: None.
17. PUBLIC HEARINGS
17.A. TO CONSIDER AMENDMENTS TO THE COUNTY CODE TO REPLACE
REFERENCES TO CHAPTER 19 WITH REFERENCES TO CHAPTER
19.1
Mr. Mincks stated this date and time has been advertised for
the Board to consider amendments to the County Code to
replace references to Chapter 19 (old zoning ordinance) with
references to Chapter 19.1 (new zoning ordinance).
Mr. Elswick called for public comment.
There being no one to address the issue, the public hearing
was closed.
On motion of Mr. Warren, seconded by Mr. Holland, the Board
adopted the following ordinance:
AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE CODE OF THE COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD,
1997, AS AMENDED, BY AMENDING AND REENACTING SECTIONS
4-11, 4-13, 4-21, 5-7.4, 6-41.1, 8.1, 8-3, 8-6, 8-25, 13-62,
14-32, 15-122.1, 15-122.7, 15-122.9, 15-124, 18-60, and 18-61
RELATING TO CHAPTER 19 and CHAPTER 19.1
BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of
Chesterfield County:
(1) That Sections 4-11, 4-13, 4-21, 5-7.4, 6-41.1, 8.1, 8-3,
8-6, 8-25, 13-62, 14-32, 15-122.1, 15-122.7, 15-122.9, 15-
124, 18-60, and 18-61 of the Code of the County of
Chesterfield,
1997, as amended, are amended and re-enacted, to read as
follows:
15-1010
08/26/15
Chapter 4
ANIMALS AND POULTRY
e
Sec. 4-11. Definitions.
For the purposes of this article, these words and phrases
shall have the following meanings:
MM
Pig or pigs: Swine of all ages and types except
Vietnamese pot-bellied pigs kept as household pets in
compliance with chapter 19.1.
MM
Sec. 4-13. Article supplementary to zoning ordinance.
The provisions of this article are supplementary to the
provisions of chapter 19.1.
Me•
Sec. 4-21. - Definitions.
Kennel: An enclosure in compliance with chapter 19.1 in which
four or more dogs, four months or older, are kept and from
which they cannot escape.
000
Chapter 5
BUILDINGS
000
Sec. 5-7.4. Same—Procedures for declaring blight;
notification of owner, public hearings.
RIM
(e) The planning commission shall determine whether:
(1) The property is blighted;
(2) The owner has failed to cure the blight or present
a reasonable plan to do so;
(3) The plan for the repair or other disposition of the
property is in accordance with the county's
comprehensive plan, zoning ordinance, and other
applicable land use regulations;
15-1011
08/26/15
W,
91
91
(4) The property is located within an area listed on
the National Register of Historic Places or,
pursuant to chapter 19.1 of this Code, is located
within an historic district or is a designated
landmark. In such instances, the planning
commission shall consult with the preservation
committee regarding the proposed repair or other
disposition of the property; and
(5) If the property is to be acquired, whether the
property is occupied for personal residential
purposes and whether it has been condemned for
human habitation for more than one year.
000
Chapter 6
BUSINESS LICENCES
41
Sec. 6-41.1. - Adult business operator.
Every person operating an adult business as defined in
chapter 19.1 shall pay a license tax of $100.00, which shall
be in addition to any other taxes or fees required for the
sale of food and drinks or the provision of services.
ME
Chapter 8
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT
000
Sec. 8-1. - Purpose and authority.
(a) The purpose of this chapter is to ensure the general
health, safety, and welfare of the citizens of the
county and protect the quality and quantity of state
waters from the potential harm of unmanaged stormwater,
including protection from land disturbing activity
causing unreasonable degradation of properties, water
quality, stream channels, and other natural resources,
and to establish procedures whereby stormwater
requirements related to water quality and quantity shall
be administered and enforced.
(b) This chapter is intended to facilitate integration of
the county's stormwater management requirements with the
county's regulations relating to erosion and sediment
control (article II) illicit discharges to the
stormwater sewer system (article III), and the
Chesapeake Bay Preservation Act requirements (chapter
19.1, article V, division 2).
(c) This article is adopted pursuant to Code of Virginia, §
62.1-44.15:27.
MM
15-1012
08/26/15
Sec. 8-3. - Stormwater permit requirement; exemptions.
(a) Except as provided herein, no person may engage in any
land -disturbing activity until a VSMP authority permit
has been issued by the environmental engineer in
accordance with the provisions of this chapter.
(b) A Chesapeake Bay Preservation Act Land -Disturbing
Activity is not subject to general permit coverage,
however it shall be subject to an erosion and sediment
control plan consistent with the requirements of article
II and, if applicable, a stormwater management plan as
outlined under section 8-6, the technical criteria and
administrative requirements for land -disturbing
activities outlined in section 8-9, and the requirements
for control measures long-term maintenance outlined
under section 8-10. Additional requirements relating to
the Chesapeake Bay Preservation Act can be found in
chapter 19.1 (zoning).
Iwe
Sec. 8-6. - Stormwater management plan; contents of plan.
(a) The stormwater management plan, required in section 8-4,
must apply the stormwater management technical criteria
set forth in section 8-9 to the entire land disturbance
activity. Individual lots in new residential,
commercial, or industrial developments shall not be
considered to be separate land -disturbing activities.
The stormwater management plan must also consider all
sources of surface runoff and all sources of subsurface
and groundwater flows converted to surface runoff. The
stormwater management plan shall include the following
information:
(1) Information on the type and location of Stormwater
discharges; information on the features to which
stormwater is being discharged including surface
waters and the predevelopment and post -development
drainage areas;
(2) Contact information including the name, address,
email and telephone number of the owner and the tax
reference number and parcel number of the property
or properties affected;
(3) A narrative, included with the construction plans
submitted for review and approval in accordance
with chapters 17 and 19.1, that includes a
description of current site conditions and final
site conditions;
HOM
Sec. 8-25. - Responsibility for the erosion and sediment
control plan.
The owner shall be responsible for preparing, submitting
and implementing the erosion and sediment control plan. The
owner shall also be responsible for the following:
15-1013
08/26/15
9
9
19
(a) Engaging the services of a responsible land
disturber as defined in this chapter;
(b) Maintaining all measures required by the erosion
and sediment control plan;
(c) Removing erosion and sediment control measures
after the environmental engineer determines that
the land is stabilized;
(d) Removing all sediment from sediment basins that are
to be converted to permanent best management
practice facilities as required by the
environmental engineer; and
(e) All sediment basins constructed in conjunction with
single family subdivisions or sections thereof that
drain to the Swift Creek Reservoir must remain in
place and fully stabilized until such time as
compliance with subsection 19.1-541.4 has been
achieved.
(f) The restoration or repair of properties and/or
waters that have been adversely affected by the
transport of sediment from the project site which
is deemed necessary by the environmental engineer.
000
Chapter 13
MOTOR VEHICLES AND TRAFFIC
inn
Sec. 13-62. - Restriction on keeping inoperable motor
vehicles; removal of such vehicles.
(a) It shall be unlawful for any person, firm or corporation
to keep, except within a fully enclosed building or
otherwise shielded or screened from view, on any
property zoned A, R, R-TH, R -MF, O and C, as those
zoning classifications are defined in chapter 19.1, any
motor vehicle, trailer or semitrailer, as such are
defined in Code of Virginia, § 46.2-100, as amended,
which is inoperable. As used in this section "shielded
or screened from view" means not visible by someone
standing at ground level from outside of the property on
which the subject vehicle is located.
(b) Notwithstanding subsection (a) above, not more than one
motor vehicle, trailer or semitrailer, as such are
defined in Code of Virginia, § 46.2-100, as amended,
which is inoperable may be kept outside of a fully
enclosed building, provided it is shielded or screened
from view by covers, on any property zoned A, R, R-TH,
R -MF, MH -1, MH -2, O and C, as defined in chapter 19.1,
if the vehicle is kept in the rear yard of the property.
The rear yard shall be the yard extending between the
rear line of the lot and the nearest line of the rear of
the main building on the lot.
15-1014
08/26/15
(c) The owners of property zoned A, R, R-TH, R -MF, MH -1, MH -
2, O and C, as defilied in chapter 19.1, shall remove
from their property any inoperable motor vehicles,
trailers or semitrailers which are in violation of this
section, within ten days after being given notice by the
county to remove such inoperable motor vehicles,
trailers or semitrailers. Notice to remove shall be
deemed given when mailed by certified mail, return
receipt requested, to the same address to which real
estate tax bills are mailed to such owners of property.
If the owners of the property do not remove the
inoperable motor vehicles, trailers or semitrailers from
the property within ten days after being given notice to
do so by the county, then the county, its agent or
employees may remove the inoperable motor vehicles,
trailers or semitrailers from the property. After giving
an additional ten days' notice to the owners of the
vehicles, the county may dispose of such motor vehicles,
trailers or semitrailers. Notice of disposal of such
motor vehicles, trailers or semitrailers is given when
mailed by certified mail, return receipt requested, to
the last known address of the owner of the inoperable
motor vehicles, trailers or semitrailers.
Notwithstanding the other provisions of this section, if
the owner of such vehicle can demonstrate that he is
actively restoring or repairing the vehicle, and if it
is shielded or screened from view, the vehicle and one
additional inoperable motor vehicle being used for
restoration or repair may remain on the property.
000
Chapter 14
OFFENSES - MISCELLANEOUS
000
Sec. 14-32. - Operation of hotel or motel; prohibited
conduct.
(a) For the purpose of this section, the terms "hotel" and
"motel" are defined as provided in chapter 19.1 of this
Code. The term "obscene" means that which, considered as
a whole, has as its dominant theme or purpose an appeal
to the prurient interest in sex, such as a shameful or
morbid interest in nudity, sexual conduct, sexual
excitement, excretory functions or products or
sadomasochistic abuse, and which goes beyond customary
limits of candor in description or representation of
such matters and which, taken as a whole, does not have
serious literary, artistic, political or scientific
value.
000
15-1015
08/26/15
9
9
P.1�
Chapter 15
REGULATED OCCUPATIONS AND SERVICES
NN$
Sec. 15-122.1. - Adult business permits required from chief
of police—Application.
(a) Every person desiring a business license to operate an
adult business, as defined in chapter 19.1, shall first
apply to the chief of police, or his designee, for a
permit to conduct such activity. Each such application
shall be accompanied by a fee in the amount of $62.00.
The permit shall be valid for a period of 12 months and
may be renewed subject to the same requirements as the
initial permit.
(b) Information required on the permit application shall
include, but not be limited to, the following:
Res
(9) A description of the intended business activity and, if
adult entertainment as defined in chapter 19.1 is to be
provided, a description of such entertainment.
MW
Sec. 15-122.7. - Regulations pertaining to adult businesses
providing adult entertainment.
(a) For purposes of this section, "adult entertainment" is
defined as dancing, modeling or other live entertainment
if the performers' performance is characterized by an
emphasis on "specified anatomical areas" or "specified
sexual activities" as defined in chapter 19.1, or is
intended for the sexual stimulation or titillation of
patrons.
Ami
Sec. 15-122.9. - Regulations pertaining to all adult
businesses.
(a) Sexually explicit material shall not be displayed in the
windows of adult businesses. Further, adult merchandise
as defined in chapter 19.1 shall not be visible from any
point outside the establishment.
Is
Sec. 15-124. - Regulations applying to adult businesses and
non -adult businesses.
Businesses that offer after May 29, 2002 that portion of
adult merchandise, as defined in chapter 19.1, which is
intended for the sexual stimulation or titillation of patrons
for sale or rent shall not permit entry to persons under age
15-1016
08/26/15
18 or must segregate the adult merchandise from the other
merchandise and structure the display of the adult
merchandise to prevent examination, perusal, or viewing of
such merchandise by juveniles.
000
Chapter 18
WATER AND SEWERS
000
Sec. 18-60. - Required use of utility system.
The distance extensions described in this section shall be
measured from the nearest existing line as measured along the
most reasonable extension route, as determined by the
director of utilities.
A. Residential. For the purposes of this section, the term
"dwelling unit" shall be as defined in chapter 19.1 and
shall not include a dwelling unit that is being rebuilt
due to damage by fire, flood, explosion, earthquake,
storm or other act of God provided such reconstruction
occurs within two years of the damage.
1. Public water system. Connection to the public water
system shall be required for new dwelling units
when:
a) Property line is within 200 feet of a water line
unless the required on-site service line is
greater than 400 feet;
b) Located within a lot subdivision recorded with
requirement for connection;
c) Located within a lot subdivision which is located
in the area shown as "required" on the
residential public water connection area on the
GIS map that receives after March 12, 2014
either:
(i) Preliminary plat approval or
(ii) Final plat approval where there are 50 or
fewer lots and the subdivider has chosen
not to submit a preliminary plat; or
d) Located in a multifamily development.
•SII
Sec. 18-61. - Exceptions to use of utility systems.
A. An exception to the requirements of sections 18-53(a) and
18-60 A.l.c), A.2.c), B.l.a), and B.2. may be granted as
follows:
1. Submission of an application with a $1000.00 fee to the
planning department.
15-1017
08/26/15
9
9
9
2. The director of planning shall process the application
and provide notice as outlined for zoning approval in
chapter 19.1.
3. In conjunction with the director of utilities, the
director of planning shall review the application and
make a recommendation to the planning commission. A
recommendation for the exception approval may include a
recommendation for the imposition of conditions. The
recommendation shall consider whether:
a) The use of a private system will encourage future
area development inconsistent with the comprehensive
plan; and
b) The ability to extend public system to other
property will be adversely affected
000
(2) That this ordinance shall become effective immediately
upon adoption.
Ayes: Elswick, Warren, Jaeckle, Holland and Gecker.
Nays: None.
17.B. TO CONSIDER AMENDMENTS TO THE COUNTY CODE RELATING TO
SMALL CELL TECHNOLOGY
Mr. Robert Clay stated this date and time has been advertised
for the Board to consider amendments to the County Code
relating to small cell technology. He further stated small
cell technology works in tandem with the existing wireless
infrastructure to improve coverage in high -traffic areas and
to increase capacity. He stated currently, small cell units
are not specifically addressed in the Zoning Ordinance and,
as such, are regulated as communications towers. He further
stated the proposed amendment would define and permit small
cells as a restricted use in all zoning districts, subject to
substantial accord determination. He noted should any of
these restrictions not be met, conditional use approval would
be required.
Mr. Elswick called for public comment.
Ms. Lori Schweller, representing Verizon Wireless, expressed
appreciation to the Planning Commission and staff for their
efforts relative to the zoning amendment. She suggested that
communications small cell be treated differently from a
communications tower due to the fee structure.
There being no one else to speak to the issue, the public
hearing was closed.
Mr. Gecker made a motion to adopt amendments to the County
Code relating to small cell technology.
In response to Mr. Gecker's question, Mr. Clay stated the fee
issue did not come up at the Planning Commission meeting, but
afterwards.
15-1018
08/26/15
In response to Mr. Holland's question, Mr. Clay stated the
fee is $7,500 as opposed to $1,400.
Ms. Jaeckle and Mr. Elswick recommended reviewing the fee
schedule.
Mr. Turner stated staff would review the fee schedule
regarding potential fee change for small cell communications
vs. communication towers.
Mr. Elswick called for a vote on the motion of Mr. Gecker,
seconded by Mr. Warren, for the Board to adopted the
following ordinance:
AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE CODE OF THE COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD,
1997, AS AMENDED, BY AMENDING AND RE-ENACTING SECTIONS 19.1-52,
19.1-53, and 19.1-570 OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE
RELATING TO REQUIREMENTS FOR COMMUNICATION SMALL CELLS
BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County:
(1) That Sections 19.1-52, 19.1-53 and 19.1-570 of the Code of the County of
Chesterfield, 1997, as amended, are amended and re-enacted to read as follows:
15-1019
08/26/15
P,r
P -P -ranted by RightRend RS -Per dtrrdwit4Re.fti,d r A=A--ry C-Co�ddanelthe
5=SPerlel Pacepaoa M- hlrnulermredHome Permit
Toning Districts
Use
R-0
R -C
R-TH
R -MF
MH -1
MH -2
MH4
A
0-1
0-2
C-1
C-2
C-3.
C4
C -s
1.1
I-2
I
tin 88
Corrununication
Conurrunicarion
equipment
C
R(2)
P
P
P
main acturin
Conununicarion
oflce
C
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
Comnuin%caion
small cell
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
Communication
studio and station
C
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
Camnan%Gallop
tower
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R j
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
15-1019
08/26/15
P,r
M
1. R-88, R-40, R-25, R-15, R-12, R-9, R-7, R -C Districts
R-TH District
MH -1, MH -2, MH -3 Districts
OPTION 1 -Architecturally incorporated
a. Antenna is architecturally incorporated into the design of a building on
property used primarily for nonresidential purposes such as, but not limited
to, churches or schools;
b. Mechanical equipment associated with the antenna is screened in accordance
with Section 19.1-317.D.1; and
c. At such time that the small cell ceases to be used for communications
purposes for 3 consecutive months, the antenna and all associated equipment
are removed from the property.
OPTION 2- Pole Mounted
a. Antenna is mounted on a pole having a minimum height of 20 feet which
supports an athletic field light, parking lot light, street light or utility line;
b. Antenna does not exceed a height of 10 feet above the height of the pole;
c. Antenna does not protrude more than 2 feet from the pole;
d. A maximum of 1 antenna is located on the pole;
e. Antenna does not exceed a diameter of 16 inches;
f. The visual impact of the antenna and mounting equipment is minimized
through the use of, but not limited to, color, material or design, as
determined by the planning department;
g. Pole -mounted mechanical equipment cabinet does not exceed seven (7)
cubic feet in size;
h. Ground -mounted mechanical equipment associated with the antenna shall be
screened in accordance with Section 19.1-317.D.1; and
i. At such time that the small cell ceases to be used for communications
purposes for 3 consecutive months, the antenna and all associated equipment
are removed from the property.
15-1020
08/26/15
2. R -MF District:
OPTION 1 -Architecturally incorporated
a. Antenna is either architecturally incorporated into the design of a
multifamily building of 2 or more stories, or a building on property used
primarily for nonresidential purposes such as, but not limited to, churches or
schools;
b. Mechanical equipment associated with the antenna is screened in accordance
with Section 19.1-317.13.1; and
c. At such time that the small cell ceases to be used for communications
purposes for 3 consecutive months, the antenna and all associated equipment
are removed from the property.
OPTION 2 -Pole -Mounted
a. Antenna is mounted on a pole having a minimum height of 20 feet which
supports an athletic field light, parking lot light, street light or utility line;
b. Antenna does not exceed a height of 10 feet above the height of the pole;
c. Antenna does not protrude more than 2 feet from the pole;
d. A maximum of 1 antenna is located on the pole;
e. Antenna does not exceed a diameter of 16 inches;
f. The visual impact of antenna and mounting equipment is minimized through the
use of, but not limited to, color, material or design, as determined by the
planning department;
g. Pole -mounted equipment cabinet does not exceed seven (7) cubic feet in size:
h. Ground -mounted mechanical equipment associated with the antenna shall be
screened in accordance with Section 19.1-317.D.1; and
i. At such time that the small cell ceases to be used for communications purposes
for 3 consecutive months, the antenna and all associated equipment are removed
from the property.
3. A District:
OPTION 1 -Architecturally incorporated
a. Antenna is architecturally incorporated into the design of a building on
property used primarily for nonresidential purposes such as, but not limited
to, silos, churches or schools;
b. Mechanical equipment associated with the antenna is screened in accordance
with Section 19.1-317.D.1; and
c. At such time that the small cell ceases to be used for communications
purposes for 3 consecutive months, the antenna and all associated equipment
are removed from the property.
15-1021
08/26/15
9
9
R
OPTION 2 -Pole -Mounted
a. Antenna is mounted on a pole having a minimum height of 20 feet which
supports an athletic field light, parking lot light, street light or utility line;
b. Antenna does not exceed a height of 10 feet above the height of the pole;
c. Antenna does not protrude more than 2 feet from the pole;
d. A maximum of 1 antenna is located on the pole;
e. Antenna does not exceed a diameter of 16 inches;
f. The visual impact of antenna and mounting equipment is minimized through
the use of, but not limited to, color, material or design, as determined by the
planning department;
g. Pole -mounted equipment cabinet does not exceed seven (7) cubic feet in
size:
h. Ground -mounted mechanical equipment associated with the antenna shall be
screened in accordance with Section 19.1-317.D.1; and
i. At such time that the small cell ceases to be used for communications
purposes for 3 consecutive months, the antenna and all associated equipment
are removed from the property.
4. 0-1, 0-2 Districts
C-1, C-2, C-3, C-4, C-5 Districts
I-1 District:
OPTION 1 -Architecturally incorporated
a. Antenna is architecturally incorporated into the design of a building;
b. Mechanical equipment associated with the antenna is screened in accordance
with Section 19.1-317.13.1; and
c. At such time that the small cell ceases to be used for communications
purposes for 3 consecutive months, the antenna and all associated equipment
are removed from the property.
OPTION 2 -Pole -Mounted
a. Antenna is mounted on a pole having a minimum height of 20 feet which
supports an athletic field light, parking lot light, street light or utility line;
b. Antenna does not exceed a height of 10 feet above the height of the pole;
c. Antenna does not protrude more than 2 feet from the pole;
d. A maximum of 1 antenna is located on the pole;
e. Antenna does not exceed a diameter of 16 inches;
f. The visual impact of antenna and mounting equipment is minimized through
the use of, but not limited to, color, material or design, as determined by the
planning department;
g. Pole -mounted equipment cabinet does not exceed seven (7) cubic feet in
size:
15-1022
08/26/15
h. Ground -mounted mechanical equipment associated with the antenna shall be
screened in accordance with Section 19.1-317.D.1; and
i. At such time that the small cell ceases to be used for communications
purposes for 3 consecutive months, the antenna and all associated equipment
are removed from the property.
5. I-2, I-3 Districts:
OPTION 1 -Architecturally incorporated
a. Antenna is architecturally incorporated into the design of a building;
b. Mechanical equipment associated with the antenna is screened in accordance
with Section 19.1-317.D.2; and
c. At such time that the small cell ceases to be used for communications
purposes for 3 consecutive months, the antenna and all associated equipment
are removed from the property.
OPTION 2 -Pole -Mounted
a. Antenna is mounted on a pole having a minimum height of 20 feet which
supports an athletic field light, parking lot light, street light or utility line;
b. Antenna does not exceed a height of 10 feet above the height of the pole;
c. Antenna does not protrude more than 2 feet from the pole;
d. A maximum of 1 antenna is located on the pole;
e. Antenna does not exceed a diameter of 16 inches;
f. The visual impact of antenna and mounting equipment is minimized through
the use of, but not limited to, color, material or design, as determined by the
planning department;
g. Pole -mounted equipment cabinet does not exceed seven (7) cubic feet in
size:
h. Ground -mounted mechanical equipment associated with the antenna shall be
screened in accordance with Section 19.1-317.D.2; and
i. At such time that the small cell ceases to be used for communications
purposes for 3 consecutive months, the antenna and all associated equipment
are removed from the property.
OPTION 3 -View minimized
a. Antenna and mounting equipment are screened from view of adjacent R, R-
TH, R -MF, MH, O, C, or I-1 zoned property, or A property designated on
the comprehensive plan for R, R-TH, R -MF, MH, O, C, or I-1 zoning, and
roads that are designed to accommodate through traffic movements;
b. View of the antenna and mounting equipment from limited access roads is
minimized through site or architectural design, topography, landscaping,
setbacks or other features;
c. Mechanical equipment associated with the antenna is screened in accordance
with Section 19.1-317.D.2; and
d. At such time that the small cell ceases to be used for communications
purposes for 3 consecutive months, the antenna and all associated equipment
are removed from the property.
000
15-1023
08/26/15
9
9
FAI
M
For the purposes of this chapter, the following words and phrases shall have the following
meanings:
000
Communication small cell: Low -powered radio access antenna, together with associated
mounting and mechanical equipment, which extends wireless communications systems
service coverage and increases network capacity, and such antenna is attached either to
a pole which supports an athletic field light, parking lot light, street light or utility line,
or to a building.
000
(2) That this ordinance shall become effective immediately upon adoption.
Ayes: Elswick, Warren, Jaeckle, Holland and Gecker.
Nays: None.
17.C. TO CONSIDER APPROPRIATION OF UP TO $70,000,000 IN
PAYMENT TO THE ESCROW AGENT FOR THE ADVANCE REFUNDING
OF UP TO $70,000,000 OF GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS AND
CLOSING COSTS
Mr. Carmody stated this date and time has been advertised for
the Board to consider appropriation of up to $70,000,000 in
payment to the escrow agent for an advance refunding of up to
$70,000,000 of various outstanding general obligation bonds
and general obligation refunding bonds. He further stated the
state code requires a public hearing for increases in
appropriations that exceed 1 percent of the budget. He noted
the payment for the escrow agent is approximately $65.7
million.
Mr. Elswick called for public comment.
There being no one to speak to the issue, the public hearing
was closed.
On motion of Mr. Warren, seconded by Mr. Gecker, the Board
approved the appropriation of up to $70,000,000 in payment to
the escrow agent for the advance refunding of up to
$70,000,000 of various outstanding general obligation bonds
and general obligation refunding bonds.
Ayes: Elswick, Warren, Jaeckle, Holland and Gecker.
Nays: None.
15-1024
08/26/15
17.D. TO CONSIDER THE EXERCISE OF EMINENT DOMAIN FOR THE
ACQUISITION OF RIGHT-OF-WAY AND EASEMENTS FOR THE OLD
BERMUDA HUNDRED ROAD AT OLD STAGE ROAD INTERSECTION
IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT
Mr. Smith stated this date and time has been advertised for
the Board to consider the exercise of eminent domain for the
acquisition of right-of-way and easements for the Old Bermuda
Hundred Road at Old Stage Road Intersection Improvements
Project. He further stated the county's right-of-way
acquisition consultant has been successful in acquiring
right-of-way and easements from twenty-four property owners
that were impacted by the project; however, the county's
consultant has been unable to reach agreement with two
owners.
Mr. Elswick called for public comment.
There being no one to speak to the issue, the public hearing
was closed.
In response to Ms. Jaeckle's question, Mr. Smith stated he
was able to communicate with the property owner in question.
In response to Mr. Gecker's question regarding the property,
Mr. Smith presented a map showing the property line. He
stated the prescriptive easement covers the existing road,
which will be purchased as feasible right-of-way.
In response to Mr. Gecker's questions, Mr. Smith stated 13
feet are proposed from existing end of pavement. He further
stated a quarter of an acre is in fee right-of-way. He stated
the property owners have some concern relative to the shift
of the road; however, monetary discussions are primarily the
focus at this point. He further stated the county plans to
realign and provide turn lanes to a dangerous curve and high -
accident location. He noted the traffic count is around 6,000
automobiles per day.
Ms. Jaeckle noted the road is an alternate route to Route 10.
Ms. Jaeckle then made a motion, seconded by Mr. Warren, for
the Board to authorize the exercise of eminent domain for the
acquisition of right-of-way and easements from the following
property owners for the Old Bermuda Hundred Road at Old Stage
Road Intersection Improvements Project:
1. Robert Thomas Barfield, 2341 Old Bermuda Hundred Road,
GPIN 8026496358
2. Aubrey S. Hinds, Jr., 2101 Old Bermuda Hundred Road, GPIN
8036481499
Ayes: Elswick, Warren, Jaeckle, Holland and Gecker.
Nays: None.
15-1025
08/26/15
9
9
9
17.E. TO CONSIDER THE EXERCISE OF EMINENT DOMAIN FOR THE
ACQUISITION OF EASEMENTS FOR THE ROUTE 60 (ALVERSER
DRIVE TO OLD BUCKINGHAM
PROJECT
Mr. Smith stated the date and time has been advertised for
the Board to consider the exercise of eminent domain for the
acquisition of easements for the Route 60 (Alverser Drive to
Old Buckingham Road) Widening Project. He further stated
staff has been unable to identify and locate all the owners
of the property despite diligence to do so. He noted the
owners are believed to be the Unknown Heirs of Fannie Webb
Hinton.
Mr. Elswick called for public comment.
There being no one to speak to the issue, the public hearing
was closed.
In response to Mr. Gecker's question, Mr. Smith stated the
resident of the home has no real objection to the project and
voiced her support relative to relocating utilities.
On motion of Mr. Gecker,
authorized the exercise
filing of a certificate
easements on the subject
Turnpike from the Unknown
Route 60 (Alverser Drive
Project.
seconded by Mr. Holland, the Board
of eminent domain including the
of deposit for the acquisition of
parcel located at 12611 Midlothian
Heirs of Fannie Webb Hinton for the
to Old Buckingham Road) Widening
Ayes: Elswick, Warren, Jaeckle, Holland and Gecker.
Nays: None.
17.F. TO CONSIDER THE LEASING OF HENRICUS HISTORICAL PARK
AND APPROVAL OF AN UPDATED OPERATING AGREEMENT WITH
THE HENRICUS FOUNDATION
Mr. Harmon stated this date and time has been advertised for
the Board to consider the leasing of Henricus Historical Park
and approval of an updated operating agreement with The
Henricus Foundation.
Mr. Elswick called for public comment.
Mr. Charlie Grant, executive director of Henricus Historical
Park, recommended approval of the new three-year lease with
two three-year renewal terms and updated operating agreement
for the continued operation of Henricus Historical Park by
The Henricus Foundation.
There being no one to speak to the issue, the public hearing
was closed.
Ms. Jaeckle noted Judge Ernest Gates was one of the original
members who entered into an agreement for the development and
operation of Henricus Historical Park, who recently lost his
wife.
In response to Mr. Holland's question regarding two parcels
of land relative to Richmond, Mr. Grant stated the issue has
not yet been resolved. He further stated there may have been
some surveying marks that were insufficient years ago. He
stated the City of Richmond may have an interest, along with
Henrico County, Chesterfield County and perhaps a private
firm.
15-1026
08/26/15
On motion of Mr. Holland, seconded by Mr. Warren, the Board
approved an updated operating agreement and the leasing of
Henricus Historical Park to The Henricus Foundation.
Ayes: Elswick, Warren, Jaeckle, Holland and Gecker.
Nays: None.
17.G. TO CONSIDER THE CONVEYANCE OF TWO PARCELS OF LAND TO
THE COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, DEPARTMENT OF
TRANSPORTATION FOR THE ROUTE 1/ROUTE 641 (DUNDAS
ROAD) TRAFFIC SIGNALIZ
ON PROJECT
Mr. Harmon stated this date and time has been advertised for
the Board to consider the conveyance of two parcels of land
to the Commonwealth of Virginia, Department of Transportation
for the Route 1/Route 641 (Dundas Road) Traffic Signalization
Project.
Mr. Elswick called for public comment.
There being no one to speak to the issue, the public hearing
was closed.
On motion of Ms. Jaeckle, seconded by Mr. Holland, the Board
approved the conveyance of two parcels of land to the
Commonwealth of Virginia, Department of Transportation for
the Route 1/Route 641 (Dundas Road) Traffic Signalization
Project, and authorized the Chairman of the Board and County
Administrator to execute the deed.
Ayes: Elswick, Warren, Jaeckle, Holland and Gecker.
Nays: None.
18. REMAINING MANUFACTURED HOME PERMITS AND ZONING REQUESTS
There were no remaining requests for manufactured home
permits or rezoning at this time.
19. FIFTEEN -MINUTE CITIZEN COMMENT PERIOD ON UNSCHEDULED
MATTERS
There were no requests to address the Board at this time.
20. ADJOURNMENT
On motion of Mr. Gecker, seconded by Mr. Warren, the Board
adjourned at 8:31 p.m. until September 16, 2015.
Ayes: Elswick, Warren, Jaeckle, Holland and Gecker.
Nays: None.
" s.11510m de"
I. WON. '9
A�J�D�a
Steph n A. Elswick—
Chairman
15-1027
08/26/15
9
9