2021-06-23 MinutesBOARD OF SUPERVISORS
MINUTES
JUNE 23, 2021
Supervisors in Attendance:
Mr. James M. Holland, Chair
Mr. Christopher M. Winslow, Vice Chair
Mr. James A. Ingle, Jr.
Mr. Kevin P. Carroll
Ms. Leslie A. T. Haley
Dr. Joseph P. Casey
County Administrator
Mr. Holland called the meeting to order at 2:00 p.m. He
requested all individuals in the Public Meeting Room to only
sit in designated seats, maintain spatial distancing from
others, and not congregate in groups.
1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
On motion of Ms. Haley, seconded by Mr. Ingle, the Board of
Supervisors approved the minutes of May 26, 2021, as submitted.
Ayes: Holland, Winslow, Ingle, Carroll and Haley.
Nays: None.
2. REQUESTS TO POSTPONE AGENDA ITEMS AND ADDITIONS,
DELETIONS OR CHANGES IN THE ORDER OF PRESENTATION
On motion of Mr. Winslow, seconded by Ms. Haley, the Board
removed from Work Sessions Item 3.E. Economic Development
Authority Property Acquisition Opportunity, and moved from the
Consent Agenda to New Business Items 12.B.14, Revisions to 2021
Rules of Procedure to Incorporate Best Practices Utilized
During COVID-19 Emergency and 12.B.18, Transfer $5 Million to
the EDA to Purchase Property Commonly Known as Southside
Speedway, and approved the agenda, as amended.
Ayes: Holland, Winslow, Ingle, Carroll and Haley.
Nays: None.
3. WORK SESSIONS
21-321
6/23/2021
3.A. EVERYDAY EXCELLENCE - EMPLOYEE
MEDICAL CENTER
Ms. Mary Martin Selby, Director of Human
Resources,
recognized
Ms. Laura Jensen, Nurse Practitioner
and Practice
Manager
for
the Employee Medical Center (EMC).
She provided
facts
and
figures of the many ways Ms. Jensen
has supported
county
and
Schools employees during the pandemic.
She stated
during
the
ice storm in February, Ms. Jensen
drove to the
EMC in
the
21-321
6/23/2021
middle of the night to preemptively move COVID-19 vaccines to
the Emergency Operations Center refrigerator, thereby saving
the temperature -sensitive vaccines from a power outage that
affected the EMC. She shared how Ms. Jensen worked almost
nonstop through the pandemic with little or no time off, and
how she volunteered on the weekends at Mental Health Support
Services' Galloway House when it was short-staffed. She stated
Ms. Jensen also volunteered with the Medical Reserve Corps to
provide COVID-19 testing. She announced Ms. Jensen was one of
ten nurses to be featured in the Richmond Times -Dispatch in
honor of National Nurses Week in May. She recognized Ms. Jensen
for her dedication, hard work, and everyday excellence.
Mr. Winslow encouraged a round of applause for Ms. Jensen, whom
he called a hero, and he thanked her for her diligence and
selflessness.
Mr. Holland thanked Ms. Jensen for her perseverance and
expressed appreciation for the difference she makes for
Chesterfield County.
3.8. HOUSING MARKET UPDATE
Mr. Jesse Smith, Deputy County Administrator, provided
statistics of the county's robust housing inventory totaling
140,804 units as of December 2020. With regard to the housing
pipeline, he stated there are almost 41,000 units that are
zoned and in some stage of development in the county. He
provided a chart of Permits Issued, 2017 to present, and
estimated there are 10 to 15 years of inventory. He then
introduced Ms. Greta Harris, President and Chief Executive]
Officer of the Better Housing Coalition, to provide an update
on projects in the county.
Ms. Harris stated the Better Housing Coalition (BHC) believes
where a person lives can change their life. She further stated
the Partnership for Housing Affordability conducted a study
which concluded the RVA region needs 20,000 units of affordable
housing to meet various housing needs across the socioeconomic
spectrum. She provided details of BHC's community and economic
impacts, noting it has invested $250 million into the region
yielding 1,600 rental apartments in 17 different communities.
She stated BHC is currently working on approximately $150
million of development that will yield over 1,000 rental and
homeownership opportunities for families. She discussed
various projects currently in progress in the county such as
Market woods, Colbrook, and Horner. She also discussed other
projects in the region including Cameo in the City of Richmond,
Carter Woods III in Henrico County, and the Armstrong and
Highland Grove subdivisions in the City of Richmond. She closed
with statistics of five young Black men in America today,
noting three would graduate from high school; two would be
involved in the criminal justice system; one would not live to i
the age of 25 because of a violent crime or incident; two would J
go to a four-year college; and one would graduate in four
years. She stated society can and should do better, and BHC
strives to work with localities to create quality places at
affordable prices for families to thrive. She thanked the Board
21-322
6/23/2021
for its partnership and looked forward to doing more in the
county.
Mr. Holland thanked Ms. Harris and stated he was impressed with
her discussion of the housing inventory in the county and the
City of Richmond. He further stated housing is fundamental to
the essence of a great community, and the goal is to have all
five young Black men doing productive work. He stated he knows
the challenges faced by young African American males, having
j been one himself coming up from the poorest of communities. He
l`r further stated by the grace of God he rose up to be the first
African American to chair the Board of Supervisors. He
applauded BHC for the work it is doing.
Ms. Harris added there are noticeable differences between BHC
and for-profit developers such as retention of properties,
self-management of properties, provision of services to
residents to help them thrive and be contributing citizens in
the region, assistance for senior citizens to age in place,
career navigation for working adults, and cultural and
educational enrichment services for young people including
scholarships to help them further their education.
Mr. Holland stated he has always championed financial literacy
and time management skills.
In response to Ms. Haley's question relative to identification
of opportunities for properties, Ms. Harris stated
opportunities are sourced in a variety of ways. She further
stated the Horner property in the county was identified
following a request from the Community Services Board which
needed housing for its consumers. She stated another way to
identify a property is to partner with localities to address a
pain point such as Park Lee Apartments, which were taken from
a liability to an asset. She further stated BHC will
occasionally work with brokers. She stated one of its biggest
needs is finding developable parcels in order to bring its
product throughout the region.
Ms. Haley stated it is important to recognize there is a need
for affordable housing across the districts and to maximize
conversations which will achieve a comfort level.
Ms. Harris concurred and stated BHC welcomes the opportunity
to provide quality, service -enriched affordable housing
throughout all aspects of the region and throughout all areas
of the county. She further stated most of its developments are
in emerging sections of each locality where it must fight the
"not in my backyard" mentality and misconceptions about
affordable housing. She stated every successful locality has
housing options for citizens across the socioeconomic spectrum,
and BHC works in partnership to try to continue to address it
with more development and preservation and good policies at
the local jurisdictional level.
Mr. Winslow thanked Ms. Harris for the work on Stigall Drive.
He inquired whether BHC tracked any measurements of success in
bringing residents up out of poverty.
21-323
6/23/2021
Ms. Harris stated there is tracking of residents through annual
income verifications. She stated at the time BHC inherited Park
Lee Apartments, the average income was $10,000, and today
Winchester Green is the epitome of a mixed income community
with an average salary of just under $30,000 per household.
She further stated each year some residents do not renew their
leases because they have been able to save money to buy a home.
She stated in the future she would like to share more data
about the economic mobility that affordable housing gives
households to change the trajectory of their lives for the i
better. She thanked Dr. Casey for his support. J
Mr. Ingle stated despite citizens' reservations about the
density of affordable housing in his district, they have come
out in support of BHC projects because it has done such a good
job of managing its developments. He thanked Ms. Harris for
the service her organization provides to his community.
Ms. Harris stated she would take those compliments back to the
team.
Mr. Carroll stated he used to patrol Park Lee Apartments as a
young police officer, and one of the first murder cases he
worked on occurred there. He further stated the living
conditions were very bad back then, but today Winchester Green
is a great success story.
Mr. Holland thanked Ms. Harris for the great work.
Ms. Danna Markland, Chief Executive Officer of the Home
Building Association of Richmond (HEAR), provided the Board
with an update on the housing market in the county. She stated
buyers are saying they can no longer afford homes in today's
market. She further stated the average new home price in the
county for the first quarter of 2021 was $404,164. Relying on
an internal HEAR report among approximately 20 builders, 19 of
whom build in the county, she stated from April to May there
was a 15 percent increase in the rate of cancellations, meaning
that people who signed contracts could longer afford the home
they intended to move into this summer. She discussed the
causes of skyrocketing costs which include lumber prices,
material delays, allocation limits, and skew optimization. She
provided the Board with a timeline of the Wells Fargo Housing
Market Index from January 2020 to the present, noting the
current reading of 81 is its lowest point in the last 13 months.
She stated a single-family home that cost $250,000 15 months
ago will cost $300,000 today, and multifamily will cost a
minimum of $20,000 more per unit. She further stated builders
are putting themselves in a self-induced coma with sales
because they cannot manage the volume and they cannot absorb
the price volatility. She provided charts of the Five Most
Active Chesterfield Communities During the First Quarter of
2021; A Comparison of New and Pre -Owned Home Average Prices
during the first quarter of 2021; and Chesterfield Communities
with Increases of Ten or More Issued Permits in the Fourth
Quarter 2020. She stated the county is doing a great job of
shifting inventory to offer a more diverse product base. She
further stated Chesterfield County posted the only decline in
lot closings in the region comparing the first quarters of 2020
and 2021. She stated this is evidence of what she has heard
21-324
6/23/2021
from every single builder which is they are running out of lots
in Chesterfield County to replenish inventory. She provided
the Board with a chart of Average Lot Prices by Jurisdiction
comparing the first quarters of 2020 and 2021 and noted lot
prices in the county did decrease by approximately $1,700. She
discussed a March 2021 analysis conducted by MarketGraphics
Research Group which estimated the county will need 14,504 lots
over the next five years. She stated the county and HBAR will
have to work together to rezone inventory to deliver to
Chesterfield residents. She then discussed single-family
neighborhoods intentionally built for rent which are becoming
a viable alternative to apartments and for -sale townhomes. She
stated there are a handful of builders who are interested in
deploying and doing it well, and the county and HBAR should
discuss it as a product mix option.
In response to Ms. Haley's question relative to increasing
available lots, Ms. Markland stated a part of it is educating
the constituency about how a growing and thriving community
builds more homes purposefully and in the right measure. She
further stated it is a question of economics and quality of
life.
Mr. Winslow noted the Clover Hill District is fairly built out,
and there are limited green space areas. With regard to the
rental neighborhood product, he expressed his concerns relative
to management and lack of national experience and stated he
would like to understand the risks for a locality to offer that
type of product.
Ms. Markland stated the Richmond market is very different from
the national market. She further stated there are many more
homegrown businesses who live in this region and understand
their reputation is on the line if they fail to produce and
manage a for -rent neighborhood appropriately. She stated she
will have a discussion as to how those concerns can be eased
and what the approach looks like.
In response to Mr. Ingle's question relative to putting a
homeowners association (HOA) in place, Ms. Markland stated she
did not know the answer, but she could add the question to the
agenda.
Mr. Ingle stated he is excited for the one -over -one unit for
his district which is about 900 square feet over 900 square
feet and can be done on about five acres to make it viable.
Mr. Carroll stated the Board is aware of what is happening with
the market. He further stated another factor driving the
problem is the lack of workers to complete the jobs. He stated
part of the balance is providing infrastructure such as fire
stations, police stations, and schools. He noted there is a
lot of land in the Matoaca District, but the Board needs to be
mindful of infrastructure.
Mr. Holland thanked Ms. Markland for the presentation. He asked
Dr. Casey to look at the issue more in the upcoming months and
necessary zoning updates. He stated the Board wants to drive
costs down where it can and make the community affordable.
21-325
6/23/2021
In response to Mr. Carroll's question relative to what the
Board can do to drive costs down, Ms. Markland stated HBAR is
working on that, and one element is building efficiencies into
the technical review committee process.
Ms. Laura Lafayette, Chief Executive Officer of the Richmond
Association of Realtors, provided the Board with a local market
update. She reviewed key metrics for single-family homes in
May 2021 and year-to-date. She stated 2020 was the best year
of this century in real estate, and 2021 is on track to outpace
2020 despite the lack of inventory. She further stated
Chesterfield is leading the way in terms of residential sales.
She stated inventory is down, pending and closed sales are up,
and days on the market have been cut in half. She stated the
pace of absorption exacerbates the feeling that inventory is
lacking. She pointed out the increase in average sales price
by 17 percent which is not a sustainable pace. She stated day
after day more and more people are being priced out of the
opportunity to own a home. She discussed the percent of
original list price received which indicates buyers must offer
more than asking price. She then reviewed the key metrics for
condominiums and townhouses. She provided graphics of Median
Sales Price for Single Family Homes and Condominiums and
Townhouses. She provided data comparing the county to
neighboring localities. She stated the gross income needed to
buy a house based on the county's average sales price of
$361,033 is approximately $4,400 monthly or $52,800 annually.
She provided a graph of salaries for various occupations, a
number of which are essential workers, and showed the
difficulty of affording a home on those salaries. She stated
collectively there is more concern about this issue than she
has ever seen, and strategies need to be developed to ensure a
range of household opportunities for the needs across the
county.
Mr. Winslow stated the graph of salaries is the most important
slide he has seen because it shows the people who are not being
reached with the county's current housing options. He further
stated the Board is open and wants to continue to have
conversations and work to be innovative in the area of
affordable housing.
In response to Mr. Ingle's question relative to condensing too
much affordable housing into one area, Ms. Lafayette stated
she believes the county is at an advantage when there are mixed
income communities whether they are naturally occurring or not.
She further stated there is a difference between a
concentration of poverty versus a mixture of incomes. She
stated concentrating poverty is not the best public policy,
and the goal is to give everyone the opportunity to live in
communities of opportunity which means affordable housing
throughout the jurisdiction.
Discussion ensued relative to the various factors which
contribute to a successful community.
Mr. Holland expressed appreciation for the presentation.
21-326
6/23/2021
3.C. CUSTOMER SERVICE/ONE-STOP SHOPPING UPDATE
Mr. Matt Harris, Deputy County Administrator, provided the
Board with an overview of the work session and introduced the
presenters.
Mr. Dave Goode, Constituent and FOIA Liaison, discussed the
implementation of the GovQA web portal designed to receive,
manage, and respond to Freedom of Information Act records
requests. He demonstrated use of the portal and discussed the
system's efficiencies, including calculation of due dates,
color -coded prioritization of requests, and redaction tools.
He provided details of the rates used to calculate costs,
noting no charges are assessed on requests under $20. He stated
the GovQA system is able to report on how well the county is
processing FOIA requests.
In response to Mr. Winslow's question relative to analysis of
commonly requested items that may already exist as public
records, Mr. Goode stated staff does conduct such an analysis.
He further stated GovQA has a trending topics category which
staff will be utilizing going forward.
Mr. Mike Nannery, Assistant Director of Utilities, provided
details of the current cohort of Emerging Senior Leaders (ESL)
which was instructed to document all changes to county
operations necessitated by the pandemic. He stated 148 items
were identified, the vast majority of which were labeled as
successful. He further stated two items presented as
opportunities warranting further investigation, the most
important of which was the need for more technology and
equipment to support a remote workforce. He stated this issue
was addressed with the use of Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and
Economic Security (CARES) Act funds. He further stated the
other item of importance was the need for a one-stop shop to
assist customers who most frequently visit the county complex
for in-person transactions, which was also one of Dr. Casey's
FY2021 priorities. He stated a multi -departmental steering
committee will be commissioned and will utilize the ESL's
findings as a springboard to launch further refinement of these
two concepts.
Ms. Khara Durden, Director of Internal Audit, provided the
Board with an update on the county's new Public Portal for
Concerns and Assistance which allows citizens to obtain help
or file a report on topics such as crime; drainage issues; and
fraud, waste and abuse, among many others. She provided the
Board with a demonstration of the fraud, waste and abuse
reporting form and stated the citizen will receive an email
confirmation of their submission containing the contact
information for the responsive department. She further stated
some concerns must be reported directly to the department. By
way of example, she discussed Social Services concerns and
stated the portal will display the pertinent phone numbers
instead of a reporting form. She stated the goal of the portal
is to improve communications with citizens and facilitate the
reporting of concerns.
21-327
6/23/2021
3.D. FINANCIAL AND FEDERAL FUNDING UPDATE
Mr. Gerard Durkin, Budget Director, provided the Board with an
overview of several financial and federal funding items on the
evening agenda. He stated FY2021 is projected to end with a
positive year-end surplus which was driven by sales and real
estate tax collections. He reviewed action items relative to
county and Schools year-end requests; the Dominion Memorandum
of Understanding (MOU); the Central Virginia Transportation
Authority (CVTA); and Elementary and Secondary School
Emergency Relief (ESHER) II and III funding.
Mr. Matt Harris provided details of the Schools Amended FY2022
Budget effective July 1, 2021. He stated revised state revenue
estimates may increase by up to $16.5 million. He further
stated Schools has divided those funds into ESSER positions;
the Teacher Pay Plan; and additional compensation and other
school initiatives.
In response to Ms. Haley's question relative to how the Board
would be acting on the $16.5 million, Mr. Harris stated staff
recommended the Board appropriate only $12.4 million at this
time. He further stated staff will bring back the remainder
for appropriation at a later date, thereby providing
flexibility heading into the fall. He then provided details of
American Rescue Plan Act (ABPA) funds totaling $68.4 million.
He stated the first of two $34.2 -million payments has been
received. He further stated the county is best served by
waiting until mid-July to finalize the full plan and present
it to the public because the federal guidance is constantly
changing.
Mr. Holland agreed that mid-July would be an appropriate time J
for the Board to receive definitive information ahead of its
July meeting.
Mr. Harris then provided details of the Emergency Rental
Assistance (ERA) item on the Consent Agenda to accept and
appropriate an additional $8.4 million to support costs
associated with emergency rent and utility relief assistance
and homelessness prevention.
3.E. 2021 GENERAL ASSEMBLY LEGISLATION
Mr. Jeff Mincks, County Attorney, provided the Board with an
overview of 2021 General Assembly legislation affecting the
county. He stated this year there were no bills requiring
changes to the County Code, but there were six optional items
for consideration. He further stated staff recommended the
Board set a public hearing in August to consider increasing
the fine for the dumping of trash from $250 to $500. He provided
details of two items pertaining to solar energy projects and
one item pertaining to outdoor refreshment area licenses and
stated staff would study these items and bring recommendations
to the Board in December. He stated another item pertains to
the authority of the county administrator to reduce speed
limits on a case-by-case basis in Business and Residential
zoning districts, and staff recommended referral of this item
to the Police Department which will make its recommendation to
21-328
6/23/2021
the Board in October. He further stated the last item pertains
to creating a new personal property tax classification for
motor vehicles that weigh over 10,000 pounds used to transport
passengers and permitting the setting of a lower tax rate. He
stated staff will determine the fiscal impact of a possible
tax rate decrease and make a recommendation to the Board as
part of the budget process.
C3.F. COMMUNITY OPERATIONS PROJECTS OVERVIEW
Mr. Scott Zaremba, Deputy County Administrator, provided the
Board with an overview of two Community Operations projects on
the Consent Agenda. He first discussed the Fleet Maintenance
Facility which will replace the Walmsley bus garage and
primarily serve school buses, fire apparatus, and dump trucks.
He stated the project includes construction of administrative
offices to replace trailers presently occupied by Fleet staff.
He further stated the Radio Shop will move into a newly
renovated area in what is currently the heavy vehicle repair
space. He stated work on the facility will commence later this
summer and should be complete by this time next year. He
further stated the consent item is for the approval of a
construction contract for $8.7 million. He then discussed the
development of the Brown and Williamson conservation area. He
stated Parks and Recreation is requesting authorization to
apply for a $400,000 grant and to execute the grant agreement
and construction contract should the grant be awarded. He
further stated a required local match of $120,000 is available
and has already been appropriated in Capital Improvement
Program (CIP) funds. He stated the grant will provide funding
for approximately two miles of walking trails and trailhead
parking and open the area for much greater usage and additional
programming. He expressed his hope that the county would be
notified of the grant award in August or September which will
then give the county three years to design, permit, and
construct the improvements. He stated staff recommended
approval of both items on the Consent Agenda.
3.G. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CONSENT AGENDA OVERVIEW
21-329
6/23/2021
Mr. Jesse Smith provided the Board with an overview of
Community Development items on the evening agenda. He first
discussed the resolution requesting the Commonwealth
Transportation Board to change the name of Jefferson Davis
Highway to Route 1. He then provided details of agenda items
to award construction contracts for the Midlothian Water Tank
and Chesdin Pump Station Bypass Connections Project; the
Anderson Pump Station VFD Upgrades Project; and the Elkhardt
Road (Ruthers Road/Pocoshock Boulevard to Elmart Lane)
Improvement Project. He reviewed the agenda items to Authorize
the Receipt and Appropriation of $8,383,893 in Federal
Emergency Rental Assistance (ERA) Funding from the U.S.
Department of Treasury for Use by the County to Support Costs
Associated with Emergency Rent and Utility Relief Assistance
and Homelessness Prevention; Designation of Chesterfield
Revenue Sharing Projects; Approval of Extension of the Route
1 Incentive Policy; and Street Name Change of Gryphon Road to
Olde Stonegate Road.
21-329
6/23/2021
4. REPORTS
4.A. DISTRICT IMPROVEMENT FUNDS (DIF) MONTHLY REPORT
The Board accepted the Monthly Report on District Improvement
Funds.
5. FIFTEEN -MINUTE CITIZEN COMMENT PERIOD ON UNSCHEDULED
MATTERS
Mr. Roland Stokes addressed the Board relative to prioritizing
the construction of the Coghill Road county park.
Mr. Holland expressed appreciation to Mr. Stokes for his
remarks and stated the county is moving up construction of the
park.
6. DINNER
On motion of Ms. Haley, seconded by Mr. Carroll, the Board
recessed for dinner.
Ayes: Holland, Winslow, Ingle, Carroll and Haley.
Nays: None.
Reconvening:
Mr. Holland requested all individuals in the Public Meeting
Room to only sit in designated seats, maintain spatial
distancing from others, and not congregate in groups. He stated
he verified that all Board members received copies of the
comments posted to the online comment portal for their
consideration. He further stated the comments are part of the
public record and can be viewed on the Board of Supervisors
webpage.
7. INVOCATION
The Honorable Chris Winslow, Clover Hill District Supervisor,
gave the invocation.
8. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Eagle Scout Paul D. Gholson, III led the Pledge of Allegiance
to the Flag of the United States of America.
9. COUNTY ADMINISTRATION UPDATE
9.A. RIVERSIDE REGIONAL INMATE UPDATE
Dr. Casey stated 68 out -of -compliant Chesterfield inmates have
been transferred to state custody in the 45 days since the
Board sent the letter to the Governor's Office. He further
21-330
6/23/2021
j
stated there are currently over 125 additional state -
responsible inmates, and he expressed his hope that the state
will continue to move that population to state facilities. He
stated presently there are 477 Chesterfield inmates at
Riverside Regional Jail, which is down from 560 on May 1, 2021.
9.B. UNC STUDENT PROJECT - PARKS AND RECREATION
Dr. Casey stated the University of North Carolina provides a
fully funded educational experience for exceptional students,
and Parks and Recreation was chosen as a destination site for
the students to work on a civic collaboration project between
Parks and Recreation and Sportable. He introduced Ms. Kate
Stukenborg, who was one of five students on the team, to
provide a summary of the project.
Ms. Stukenborg stated the civic collaboration team is working
with Parks and Recreation on the accessibility of the Fall Line
Trail. She provided details of the team's research on ways to
make the trail inclusive and accessible. She stated the team's
final report containing recommendations should be available
mid-July.
9.C. EXPIRATION OF LOCAL STATE OF EMERGENCY
Dr. Casey stated the Governor is expected to let the state of
emergency expire at the end of the month, and it is Dr. Casey's
intention to let the local state of emergency expire at the
same time. He further stated he would work with the County
Attorney to determine the manner in which to repeal the local
Continuity of Government ordinance prior to its expiration in
September. He stated there is an agenda item to amend the
Board's Rules of Procedure to incorporate some beneficial
practices adopted during the pandemic. Lastly, he announced
the production of a COVID-19 wrap-up video featuring
Chesterfield Health District Director Dr. Alexander Samuel,
Chesterfield Fire and EMS Chief Loy Senter, and Deputy County
Administrator Dr. James Worsley. He stated there would be no
more formal, detailed updates going forward unless there is an
issue or topic of interest to the Board.
9.D. BUDGET DIRECTOR INTRODUCTION
Dr. Casey announced Mr. Gerard Durkin has been selected as the
21-331
6/23/2021
county's new Director of Budget and Management. He stated Mr.
Durkin has
been with the county since 2018
serving in various
leadership
roles including Budget Manager
and Acting Budget
Director.
He further stated Mr. Durkin
brings a strong
background
in economic forecasting and analytics,
and he has
introduced
a strong data -driven culture in
the department.
Mr. Durkin
expressed appreciation for being
selected. He stated
he is privileged and proud to serve in the
community in which
he lives.
21-331
6/23/2021
9.E. OTHER COUNTY ADMINISTRATION UPDATES
Dr. Casey recognized Ms. Donna Arrington, Director of
Accounting, and Ms. Lindsey Thornton, Assistant Director of
Accounting, and announced the county's FY2020 audit report was
awarded a Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in
Financial Reporting by the Government Finance Officers
Association. He stated this is the highest form of recognition
for an audit report that meets many standards of disclosures
and public information. He further stated this is the 40th
consecutive year the county has received this prestigious
award.
10. BOARD MEMBER REPORTS
Mr. Ingle invited Dr. Chris Jones, Principal of Thomas Dale
High School, and members of his staff to provide the Board with
an overview of the WeatherSTEM device installed at Thomas Dale.
Dr. Jones expressed his pride in serving the students and
families of Thomas Dale High School. He introduced Mr. Ricky
Talman, Director of Student Activities, and Mr. Mike Puglia,
Athletic Trainer, and praised them for their great work on the
WeatherSTEM project.
Mr. Talman provided the Board with a history of the project
which began two years ago with the goal of protecting students
from extreme temperatures and severe weather events. He stated
the weather station has been beneficial not only to Thomas Dale
but also to other county schools seeking minute -by -minute
weather updates. He further stated the weather station serves
a great purpose for the community.
Mr. Puglia discussed the desire to protect the health and
wellbeing of every single student athlete in county schools.
He provided details of the many ways in which the weather
station contributes to this goal.
Mr. Ingle stated the weather station was beneficial for the
many outdoor high school graduations this year.
Ms. Haley announced the kick-off of National Night Out on June
26, 2021 at 5:00 p.m. at Westchester Commons. She stated the
county receives national and state recognition for excelling
at this annual event.
Mr. Carroll congratulated the recent high school graduates. He
stated they are a great group of kids who will hopefully live,
work, and play in the county.
Mr. Winslow announced the ribbon cutting ceremony for the new
Reams Road Elementary School to be held on June 24, 2021 at
11:30 a.m.
Mr. Holland announced he had the honor to speak at the first
Chesterfield County Juneteenth Celebration. He discussed the
importance of June 19, 1665 when 250,000 slaves in Texas
learned of their freedom two and one-half years after the
signing of the Emancipation Proclamation. He thanked the many
21-332
6/23/2021
people involved in planning the event. He noted both the
President and the Governor have recognized Juneteenth as a
holiday, and he directed Dr. Casey and Human Resources to look
at making it an official county holiday. He also announced his
attendance at the Bird and Meadowbrook high school graduations.
He congratulated the graduates and wished them well.
11. RESOLUTIONS AND SPECIAL RECOGNITIONS
�. 11.A. RESOLUTION RECOGNIZING MR. PAUL D. GHOLSON, III
UPON ATTAINING THE RANK OF EAGLE SCOUT
Ms. Susan Pollard, Director of Communications and Media,
introduced Mr. Paul D. Gholson, III, who was present to receive
the resolution.
On motion of Mr. Winslow, seconded by Mr. Holland, the Board
adopted the following resolution:
WHEREAS, the Boy Scouts of America was incorporated by
Mr. William D. Boyce on February 8, 1910, and was chartered by
Congress in 1916; and
WHEREAS, the Boy Scouts of America was founded to build
character, provide citizenship training and promote physical
fitness; and
WHEREAS, after earning at least 21 merit badges in a wide
variety of skills including leadership, service and outdoor
life, serving in a leadership position in a troop, carrying
out a service project beneficial to their community, being
active in the troop, demonstrating Scout spirit, and living up
to the Scout Oath and Law, Mr. Paul D. Gholson, III, of Troop
876, sponsored by Mt. Pisgah United Methodist Church, has
accomplished those high standards of commitment and has reached
the long -sought goal of Eagle Scout, which is received by only
four percent of those individuals entering the Scouting
movement; and
WHEREAS, growing through his experiences in Scouting,
learning the lessons of responsible citizenship, and
endeavoring to prepare himself for a role as a leader in
society, Paul has distinguished himself as a member of a new
generation of prepared young citizens of whom we can all be
very proud.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chesterfield
County Board of Supervisors, this 23rd day of June 2021,
publicly recognizes Mr. Paul D. Gholson, III, extends
congratulations on his attainment of Eagle Scout, and
acknowledges the good fortune of the county to have such an
outstanding young man as its citizen.
Ayes: Holland, Winslow, Ingle, Carroll and Haley.
Nays: None.
Ms. Haley presented the executed resolution and patch to Mr.
Gholson, accompanied by members of his family, congratulated
21-333
6/23/2021
him on his outstanding achievements and wished him well in
future endeavors.
Mr. Gholson provided details of his Eagle Scout project which
resulted in the collection of over 2,600 pounds of food for
the Chesterfield Food Bank.
11.3. RESOLUTION RECOGNIZING MR. CHARLES T. MAGUIRE FOR
HIS SERVICE AS A MEMBER OF THE HEALTH CENTER
COMMISSION (HCC) FOR THE COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD
Mr. Derrick Kendall, Chief Executive Officer of Lucy Corr,
introduced Mr. Charles Maguire, who was present to receive the
resolution.
On motion of Mr. Holland, seconded by Mr. Carroll, the Board
adopted the following resolution:
WHEREAS, Mr. Charles T. "Chuck" Maguire has served as a
volunteer representative on the Chesterfield County Health
Center Commission for two consecutive four-year terms
beginning from July 1, 2013 until June 30, 2021, serving with
devotion and integrity admired by all; and
WHEREAS, during Mr. Maguire's tenure he served with
leadership and dedication in many capacities including that of
Chair and Vice -Chair and he provided guidance to both the
Finance and Strategic Planning Committees on which he served;
and
WHEREAS, Mr. Maguire drew on his strong financial
knowledge and distinguished career in banking and commercial
lending to help the Commission fortify its financial position
and navigate its way through various economic challenges; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Maguire brought to the Commission a solid
sense of discipline and focus through his highest standards of
professional ethics and personal integrity; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Maguire's faith and personal family
experiences brought to the Commission a unique perspective
regarding daily operations and the allocation of resources
necessary to ensure the provision of compassionate care to Lucy
Corr residents; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Maguire worked tirelessly to support the Lucy
Corr mission, vision and values; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Maguire has shown such an unwavering and
selfless commitment to serve that it has brought recognition
and credit not only to himself, but also to Chesterfield
County, the Chesterfield County Health Center Commission and
Lucy Corr.
i
`•!
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chesterfield
County Board of Supervisors and the Chesterfield County Health
Center Commission, this 23rd day of June 2021 publicly
recognize the outstanding contributions of Mr. Charles T.
"Chuck" Maguire and extend, on behalf of their members, Lucy
21-334
6/23/2021
Corr, and the citizens of Chesterfield County, their sincere
appreciation for his service and dedication to improving the
quality of life to those we serve.
AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that a copy of the resolution
be presented to Mr. Maguire and that this resolution be
permanently recorded among the papers of the Board of
Supervisors of Chesterfield County, Virginia.
Ayes: Holland, Winslow, Ingle, Carroll and Haley.
Nays: None.
Mr. Carroll presented Mr. Maguire with the executed resolution
and expressed gratitude for his skills and talent which have
greatly benefitted the community.
Mr. Maguire expressed appreciation for the recognition and
stated he feels blessed to have seen another aspect of humanity
not often seen in the banking environment.
11.C. RESOLUTION RECOGNIZING MR. JEFFERY L. FRANKLIN,
UTILITIES DEPARTMENT, UPON HIS RETIREMENT
Mr. George Hayes, Director of Utilities, introduced Mr. Jeffery
Franklin, who was present to receive the resolution.
On motion of Mr. Holland, seconded by Mr. Carroll, the Board
adopted the following resolution:
WHEREAS, Mr. Jeffery L. Franklin joined Chesterfield
County on May 14, 1984, as a Financial System Accountant in
the Accounting Department, was promoted to Financial Systems
Supervisor in 1986, Accounting Manager in 1992, Assistant
Director of Utilities for Finance and Administration in August
2003; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Franklin will retire from the county on
August 1, 2021, after more than 37 years of dedicated service;
and
WHEREAS, Mr. Franklin graduated Magna Cum Laude from
Virginia State University with a Bachelor of Science in
Accounting; and
WHEREAS, in 2002, Mr. Franklin was the team lead in
implementing Governmental Accounting Standards Board Statement
Number 34, resulting in significant changes to the financial
statements and notes in the Comprehensive Annual Financial
Report; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Franklin was the team lead for the 2007
Revenue Bond Sale for the Department of Utilities, resulting
in a Triple -AAA bond rating, the highest bond rating achievable
from all three rating agencies, an outstanding achievement
maintained for his entire career, significantly contributing
to affordable utility rates for our customers; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Franklin continuously improved the
Department of Utilities through his active service in numerous
21-335
6/23/2021
committees including Chair of the Performance Council, All -
Staff Committee, Policy and Procedures Committee; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Franklin was project sponsor for the new
Customer Information System in 2011, improving the service to
customers and operational process for staff; and
WHEREAS, in 2016, Mr. Franklin was team lead for the
issuance of the 2016 refunding bonds to refinance the 2007 and
2009 water and sewer bonds, obtaining an astonishing 1.13
percent true interest rate, saving our utility customers over
$9 million; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Franklin was project team leader for the
ongoing Advanced Metering Infrastructure project which will
replace all of the county's 120,000 water meters with smart
meters, enhancing customer service, operational efficiency,
environmental stewardship; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Franklin was committed to improving our
community as evident through his service on the United Way
Campaign Committee, serving as Supervisory Committee Chair for
the Chesterfield Federal Credit Union; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Franklin was committed to supporting
excellence and quality in local government.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chesterfield
County Board of Supervisors, this 231d day of June 2021,
publicly recognizes the outstanding contributions of Mr.
Jeffery L. Franklin, expresses the appreciation of all citizens
for his service to Chesterfield County, and extends
appreciation for his dedicated service to the county,
congratulations upon his retirement, and best wishes for a long
and happy retirement.
AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that a copy of this resolution
be presented to Mr. Franklin, and that this resolution be
permanently recorded among the papers of this Board of
Supervisors of Chesterfield County, Virginia.
Ayes: Holland, Winslow, Ingle, Carroll and Haley.
Nays: None.
Mr. Holland presented the executed resolution to Mr. Franklin,
accompanied by members of his family, and expressed
appreciation for his outstanding service as well as his ethics,
integrity, and faith.
Dr. Casey presented Mr. Franklin with an engraved brick,
expressed appreciation for his many years of dedicated service
to the county and wished him well in his retirement.
Mr. Franklin expressed appreciation for his faith, family, and
many county directors and staff with whom he worked during his
career.
A standing ovation followed.
21-336
6/23/2021
12.A. APPOINTMENTS
13.A.1. HEALTH CENTER COMMISSION (HCC) FOR THE COUNTY OF
CHESTERFIELD
On motion of Mr. Winslow, seconded by Ms. Haley, the Board
nominated/appointed/reappointed Mr. Hobart Harvey, Dr. Ajit
Singh, and Ms. Sarah Snead to serve as At -Large Commissioners
to the Health Center Commission for the County of Chesterfield,
whose terms are effective July 1, 2021 and will expire June
30, 2025.
And, further, the Board nominated and appointed Mr. Ralph
Taylor to fill the vacancy created by the resignation of Mr.
Vernon Baker, whose term is effective July 1, 2021 and will
expire June 30, 2023.
Ayes: Holland, Winslow, Ingle, Carroll and Haley.
Nays: None.
12.A.2. COMMUNITY CRIMINAL JUSTICE BOARD
On motion of Ms. Haley, seconded by Mr. Ingle, the Board
nominated/appointed/reappointed the following individuals to
serve as members on the Community Criminal Justice Board, whose
terms are effective July 1, 2021, and will expire June 30,
2023:
Honorable Stacey Davenport, Commonwealth's Attorney,
` Chesterfield County
Honorable Matthew D. Nelson, General District Court Judge
Honorable M. Duncan Minton Jr., Juvenile and Domestic
Relations Court Judge
Dr. James Worsley, Chesterfield County Government
Representative
Mr. Daniel J. Holser, Chief Magistrate, Chesterfield County
Mr. Michael Sorensen, Colonial Heights Citizen Representative
Mr. William E. Feasenmyer, Colonial Heights Citizen
Representative
Honorable Alfred Gray Collins, III, Commonwealth's Attorney,
City of Colonial Heights
Sheriff Karl Leonard, Sheriff, Chesterfield County
Ms. Ashley Slone, Defense Attorney
Ms. Kelly Fried, Executive Director, Chesterfield Department
of Mental Health Support Services
Ayes: Holland, Winslow, Ingle, Carroll and Haley.
Nays: None.
12.A.3. SOCIAL SERVICES BOARD
On motion of Mr. Ingle, seconded by Ms. Haley, the Board
nominated and appointed Ms. Angie Grant and Mr. James Payne,
Jr., to serve as at -large representatives on the Social
Services Board, whose terms are effective July 1, 2021, and
will expire June 30, 2025. (It is noted that one Colonial
21-337
6/23/2021
Heights position converts to a Chesterfield position at the
end of Ms. Betsy Luck's term which expires June 30, 2021.)
Ayes: Holland, Winslow, Ingle, Carroll and Haley.
Nays: None.
12.A.4. BOARD OF BUILDING/FIRE CODE APPEALS
On motion of Ms. Haley, seconded by Mr. Ingle, the Board
nominated and reappointed Mr. Jack Wilson and Mr. Christian
Eudailey to serve as at -large representatives on the Board of
Building and Fire Code Appeals, whose terms are effective July
1, 2021, and will expire June 30, 2024.
Ayes: Holland, Winslow, Ingle, Carroll and Haley.
Nays: None.
12.A.5. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
On motion of Mr. Winslow, seconded by Ms. Haley, the Board
nominated and reappointed Mr. John Cogbill, III, to serve as
an at -large representative on the Economic Development
Authority, whose term is effective July 1, 2021, and will
expire June 30, 2025.
Ayes: Holland, Winslow, Ingle, Carroll and Haley.
Nays: None.
Mr. Ingle stated there is confusion in the community about the
roles of the Department of Economic Development and the
Economic Development Authority. He directed staff to hold a
work session next month to explain the differences between
their roles.
12.B. CONSENT ITEMS
12.8.1. ADOPTION OF RESOLUTIONS
12.B.1.a. RESOLUTION RECOGNIZING MRS. DEBRA H. GRANTHAM,
EMERGENCY COMMUNICATIONS CENTER, UPON HER
RETIREMENT
On motion of Ms. Haley, seconded by Mr. Ingle, the Board
adopted the following resolution:
WHEREAS, Mrs. Debra H. Grantham began her public service
with the County as a Police Dispatcher on September 3, 1991 in
the Emergency Communications Center, and faithfully served
Chesterfield County for over 29 years until June 1, 2021; and
WHEREAS, Mrs. Grantham was able to adapt to the ever-
changing environment and growth within Chesterfield County and
the Emergency Communications Center including the
Consolidation of the Emergency Communications Center, upgrades
of the enhanced 9-1-1 system, county's radio system, and
Computer -Aided Dispatch System throughout her career; and
21-338
6/23/2021
WHEREAS, Mrs. Grantham has provided a high level of
commitment to her work performance as a thorough and
conscientious employee; and
WHEREAS, Mrs. Grantham has provided the Emergency
Communications Center and Chesterfield County with many years
of loyal and dedicated service; and
WHEREAS, Chesterfield County and the Board of Supervisors
thank Mrs. Grantham for her diligent service.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chesterfield
County Board of Supervisors, June 23, 2021 recognizes Mrs.
Debra H. Grantham, and extends on behalf of its members and
the citizens of Chesterfield County, appreciation for her
service to the county, congratulations upon her retirement,
and best wishes for a long and happy retirement.
Ayes: Holland, Winslow, Ingle, Carroll and Haley.
Nays: None.
12.B.1.b. RESOLUTION RECOGNIZING MR. GARLAND L. BLANTON,
III, UTILITIES DEPARTMENT, UPON HIS RETIREMENT
On motion of Ms. Haley, seconded by Mr. Ingle, the Board
adopted the following resolution:
WHEREAS, Mr. Garland L. Blanton, III, will retire from
the Chesterfield County Utilities Department on July 1, 2021,
after faithfully serving the county and its citizens for more
than 24 years; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Blanton began his career with Chesterfield
County on June 16, 1997, when he was hired by the Chesterfield
21-339
6/23/2021
WHEREAS, Mrs. Grantham has significantly impacted
Emergency Communications by serving in a multitude of positions
during her career to include Dispatcher, Cross -trained
Dispatcher, and Communications Training Officer, during her
twenty-nine years; and
WHEREAS, Mrs. Grantham received a Commendation Award from
the Chief of Police in 2006, the ECC Employee of the Quarter
(Leap -Up Award) in 2009, a Chesterfield Fire and EMS Life Save
Award in 2021; and
WHEREAS, Mrs. Grantham served on the Emergency
Communications Quality Council for several years; and
WHEREAS, Mrs. Grantham remained certified as an Emergency
Medical Technician for over 29 years; and
WHEREAS, Mrs. Grantham assisted with NCIC/VCIN vehicle
validations to keep the county in compliance with state and
federal regulations; and
WHEREAS, Mrs. Grantham displayed a helpful, courteous,
and caring attitude while working with internal and external
customers; and
WHEREAS, Mrs. Grantham has provided a high level of
commitment to her work performance as a thorough and
conscientious employee; and
WHEREAS, Mrs. Grantham has provided the Emergency
Communications Center and Chesterfield County with many years
of loyal and dedicated service; and
WHEREAS, Chesterfield County and the Board of Supervisors
thank Mrs. Grantham for her diligent service.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chesterfield
County Board of Supervisors, June 23, 2021 recognizes Mrs.
Debra H. Grantham, and extends on behalf of its members and
the citizens of Chesterfield County, appreciation for her
service to the county, congratulations upon her retirement,
and best wishes for a long and happy retirement.
Ayes: Holland, Winslow, Ingle, Carroll and Haley.
Nays: None.
12.B.1.b. RESOLUTION RECOGNIZING MR. GARLAND L. BLANTON,
III, UTILITIES DEPARTMENT, UPON HIS RETIREMENT
On motion of Ms. Haley, seconded by Mr. Ingle, the Board
adopted the following resolution:
WHEREAS, Mr. Garland L. Blanton, III, will retire from
the Chesterfield County Utilities Department on July 1, 2021,
after faithfully serving the county and its citizens for more
than 24 years; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Blanton began his career with Chesterfield
County on June 16, 1997, when he was hired by the Chesterfield
21-339
6/23/2021
County Utilities Department as a Laboratory Technician at the
Proctors Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant; and
WHEREAS,
Mr.
Blanton completed his career
with
Chesterfield
County
as a Principal Plant Operator at
the
Falling Creek
Wastewater Treatment Plant; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Blanton supported the department's role of
being a responsible protector of the environment by providing
wastewater treatment that is safe, reliable, and
environmentally sound; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Blanton continuously utilized his knowledge
of the operations and equipment of the Proctor's Creek
Wastewater Treatment Plant and the Falling Creek Wastewater
Treatment Plant to ensure effluent quality that met state
discharge permit requirements; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Blanton's daily efforts contributed to the
county's wastewater treatment facilities' receiving numerous
awards over the years from regulatory agencies and wastewater
industry associations; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Blanton helped Chesterfield County Utilities
achieve both Silver and Gold Peak Performance Awards from the
National Association of Clean Water Agencies for exceptional
performance and effluent quality at the Falling Creek
Wastewater Treatment Plant; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Blanton acted as an exemplary steward of the
public trust by working with fellow operators to optimize plant
operations in the most cost-effective and efficient manner;
and
WHEREAS, throughout his career with Chesterfield County,
Mr. Blanton displayed dependability, aptitude, good character,
and high values.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chesterfield
County Board of Supervisors recognizes the contributions of
Mr. Garland L. Blanton, III, expresses the appreciation of all
residents for his service to the county, and extends their
appreciation for his dedicated service and their
congratulations upon his retirement.
Ayes: Holland, Winslow, Ingle, Carroll and Haley.
Nays: None.
12.S.1.c. RESOLUTION RECOGNIZING MS. MARY ELLERS, MENTAL
HEALTH SUPPORT SERVICES, UPON HER RETIREMENT
On motion of Ms. Haley, seconded by Mr. Ingle, the Board
adopted the following resolution:
WHEREAS, Ms. Mary Ellers was hired by Chesterfield County
Mental Health Support Services as a part-time Residential
Counselor for Chesterfield Residential Services on August 30,
2004 and was promoted to full-time Residential Counselor on
June 1, 2005; and
21-340
6/23/2021
j
j
WHEREAS, Ms. Ellers came to Chesterfield Service
Coordination as a full-time ID/DD Support Coordinator in
February 2007; and
WHEREAS, Ms. Ellers served for five years on the Service
Coordination Dual Diagnosis Team; and
WHEREAS, Ms. Ellers provided Aid to Capacity evaluations
to assist individuals with disabilities with decision-making
support; and
WHEREAS, Ms. Ellers participated on Chesterfield's
Quality Assurance Team in Service Coordination to help improve
quality and maintain excellence in record keeping; and
WHEREAS, Ms. Ellers secured resources for individuals
with disabilities to allow them opportunities to live
successfully in the community; and
WHEREAS, Ms. Ellers accessed resources through assisted
technology and environmental modifications to improve
individuals' quality of life; and
WHEREAS, Ms. Ellers provided dedicated and innovative
service and will be missed by the individuals in her care and
their families as well as staff.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chesterfield
County Board of Supervisors, this 23rd day of June 2021,
publicly recognizes the outstanding contributions of Ms. Mary
Ellers and extends appreciation, on behalf of its members and
the citizens of Chesterfield County, for 16 years of service,
` congratulations upon her retirement, and best wishes for a
long, happy and healthy retirement.
Ayes: Holland, Winslow, Ingle, Carroll and Haley.
Nays: None.
12.B.1.d. ABSOLUTION RECOGNIZING FIREFIGHTER VICTOR L.
HENDERSON, FIRE AND EMS DEPARTMENT, UPON HIS
RRTTRRMF.N
On motion of Ms. Haley, seconded by Mr. Ingle, the Board
adopted the following resolution:
WHEREAS, Firefighter Victor L. Henderson will retire from
the Chesterfield Fire and Emergency Medical Services
Department, Chesterfield County, on June 1, 2021, and has
faithfully served the County of Chesterfield and its citizens
for 25 years in various assignments; and
! WHEREAS, Firefighter Henderson attended Recruit School
#26 in 1996; and
WHEREAS, Firefighter Henderson has served as a
firefighter at the Buford, Chester, Bon air, Dale, River's
Bend, Manchester, and Harrowgate Fire and EMS Stations; and
21-341
6/23/2021
WHEREAS, Firefighter Henderson served as a member of the
Honor Guard for 25 years; and
WHEREAS, Firefighter Henderson was awarded an EMS Unit
Citation for extraordinary patient care to a patient with a
self-inflicted gunshot wound in 2010; and
WHEREAS, Firefighter Henderson was awarded an EMS Unit
Citation for extraordinary performance in response to a vehicle
accident, providing care to a patient who had been ejected in
2011; and
WHEREAS, Firefighter Henderson was awarded an EMS Life
Save Award for outstanding performance for treating a patient
in cardiac arrest in 2013; and
WHEREAS, Firefighter Henderson was awarded an EMS Unit
Citation for a patient in ventricular fibrillation in 2015;
and
WHEREAS, Firefighter Henderson was awarded a Unit Life
Save Award for teamwork and commendable performance involving
a patient in cardiac arrest in 2016; and
WHEREAS, Firefighter Henderson was awarded a Unit
Citation for exemplary teamwork resulting in a patient's
survival of life-threatening injuries in 2019.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chesterfield
County Board of Supervisors recognizes the contributions of
Firefighter victor L. Henderson, expresses the appreciation of
all citizens for his service to the county and extends
appreciation for his dedicated service and congratulations
upon his retirement.
Ayes: Holland, Winslow, Ingle, Carroll and Haley.
Nays: None.
12.B.1.e. ABSOLUTION RECOGNIZING CORPORAL CHAD I. SIMPSON,
POLICE DEPARTMENT, UPON HIS RETIREMENT
On motion of Ms. Haley, seconded by Mr. Ingle, the Board
adopted the following resolution:
WHEREAS, Corporal Chad I. Simpson will retire from the
Chesterfield County Police Department on July 1, 2021 after
providing over 21 years of quality service to the residents of
Chesterfield County; and
WHEREAS, Corporal Simpson began his career as a pre -
certified law enforcement officer, bringing to Chesterfield
County the skills and knowledge of a veteran police officer;
and
WHEREAS, Corporal Simpson faithfully served the county as
a Police Officer, Senior Police Officer, Master Police Officer,
Career Police Officer and Corporal; and
21-342
6/23/2021
WHEREAS, Corporal Simpson, during his tenure, also served
as a Field Training Officer, Desk Officer Project Lifesaver
equipment operator and as a member of the Special Response
Unit; and
WHEREAS, Corporal Simpson received an Achievement Award
for his detailed investigation involving vending machine
robberies and, utilizing citizen reports, he was able to
locate, identify and arrest the suspect; and
`.. WHEREAS, Corporal Simpson was recognized with a Chief's
Commendation for his proactive police work and teamwork during
a narcotics surveillance operation that resulted in the
recovery of various narcotics, drug paraphernalia and cash as
well as the arrest of the suspect; and
WHEREAS, Corporal Simpson and fellow members of the K-9
Unit were presented with a Unit Citation commending their
policing skills while working with their canine partners, and
their exemplary service over a multi-year period resulted in
the arrest of over 1,500 individuals involved in narcotic
crimes and other criminal activity; and
WHEREAS, Corporal Simpson has been an experienced drug
K-9 handler since 2012, achieving great success in locating
illegal drugs, and conducting many K-9 demonstrations for the
community and young children with his canine partners "Ace"
and "Kyber"; and
WHEREAS, Corporal Simpson was recognized by his
supervisors for sharing his extensive knowledge and experience
with fellow employees and taking time as the informal leader
on the shift to mentor younger officers; and
WHEREAS, Corporal Simpson is recognized for strong work
ethic, his teamwork, and excellent communications and human
relations skills, all of which he has utilized within the
Police Department and in assisting residents of Chesterfield
County during his career; and
WHEREAS, Corporal Simpson has received numerous letters
of commendation, thanks and appreciation for services
rendered; and
WHEREAS, Corporal Simpson has provided the Chesterfield
County Police Department with many years of loyal and dedicated
service; and
WHEREAS, Chesterfield County and the Board of Supervisors
will miss Corporal Simpson's diligent service.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chesterfield
County Board of Supervisors publicly recognizes Corporal Chad
I. Simpson and extends on behalf of its members and the
residents of Chesterfield County, appreciation for his service
to the county, congratulations upon his retirement, and best
wishes for a long and happy retirement.
Ayes: Holland, Winslow, Ingle, Carroll and Haley.
Nays: None.
21-343
6/23/2021
12.B.1.f. RESOLUTION RECOGNIZING CORPORAL CARLOS E. GIBSON,
JR., POLICE DEPARTMENT, UPON HIS RETIREMENT
recognition his exhaustive knowledge of the law pertaining to
On motion of Ms. Haley, seconded by Mr. Ingle, the Board
automobile crash situations, his patience and expertise in
adopted the following resolution:
firearms training of new recruits and his dedication to the
WHEREAS, Corporal Carlos E. Gibson, Jr. will retire from
Special Response Unit; and
the Chesterfield County Police Department on July 1, 2021 after
WHEREAS, Corporal Gibson served as Range Master for ten
providing over 26 years of quality service to the residents of
years, where he was directly responsible for firearms training
Chesterfield County; and
for the entire police department, and he implemented new
WHEREAS, Corporal Gibson faithfully served the county as
effective training methods and facilitated cost saving
a Police Officer, Senior Police Officer, Master Police Officer,
measures for replacement weapon purchases; and
Career Police Officer and Corporal; and
WHEREAS, Corporal Gibson achieved Master classification
WHEREAS, Corporal Gibson, during his tenure, served as a
in the Enhanced Service Pistol Division (ESP) of the
Field Training Officer, General Instructor, Expert Firearms
International Defensive Pistol Association, which is
Instructor, Driving Instructor, Mountain Bike Instructor,
considered the hardest in which to obtain a Master ranking;
Special Response Unit member and Crash Team member; and
and
WHEREAS, Officer Gibson received a Chiefs Commendation
WHEREAS, Corporal Gibson served as the first Police
for his diligent work on the Ettrick Task Force, resulting in
Digital Evidence Coordinator where he was responsible for the
a crime reduction, and he was also recognized with a Chief's
administrative oversight of the Body Worn Camera program; and
Commendation for his dedication to training excellence which
WHEREAS, Corporal Gibson was consistently recognized by
resulted in a significant measurable improvement in officer
his supervisors as a consummate professional who is very
shotgun handling skills; and
dedicated, innovative and committed to continuous improvement;
WHEREAS, Master Officer Gibson received a National
and
Service Award for his two-week deployment to Mississippi to
assist local fellow law enforcement officers and the citizens
of Mississippi while under extreme conditions following the
devastation of Hurricane Katrina; and
WHEREAS, Master Officer Gibson was presented with the
Mason T. Chalkley Supervisory Award for Excellence in
recognition his exhaustive knowledge of the law pertaining to
automobile crash situations, his patience and expertise in
firearms training of new recruits and his dedication to the
Special Response Unit; and
WHEREAS, Corporal Gibson served as Range Master for ten
years, where he was directly responsible for firearms training
for the entire police department, and he implemented new
effective training methods and facilitated cost saving
measures for replacement weapon purchases; and
WHEREAS, Corporal Gibson achieved Master classification
in the Enhanced Service Pistol Division (ESP) of the
International Defensive Pistol Association, which is
considered the hardest in which to obtain a Master ranking;
and
WHEREAS, Corporal Gibson served as the first Police
Digital Evidence Coordinator where he was responsible for the
administrative oversight of the Body Worn Camera program; and
WHEREAS, Corporal Gibson was consistently recognized by
his supervisors as a consummate professional who is very
dedicated, innovative and committed to continuous improvement;
and
21-344
6/23/2021
WHEREAS, Corporal Gibson is recognized for strong work
ethic, his teamwork, and excellent communications and human
relations skills, all of which he has utilized within the
Police Department and in assisting residents of Chesterfield
County during his career; and
WHEREAS, Corporal Gibson has received numerous letters of
commendation, thanks and appreciation for services rendered;
and
WHEREAS, Corporal Gibson has provided the Chesterfield
County Police Department with many years of loyal and dedicated
service; and
WHEREAS, Chesterfield County and the Board of Supervisors
will miss Corporal Gibson's diligent service.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chesterfield
County Board of Supervisors publicly recognizes Corporal
Carlos E. Gibson, Jr. and extends on behalf of its members and
the residents of Chesterfield County, appreciation for his
service to the county, congratulations upon his retirement,
and best wishes for a long and happy retirement.
Ayes: Holland, Winslow, Ingle, Carroll and Haley.
Nays: None.
12.B.1.g. RESOLUTION REQUESTING COMMONWEALTH TRANSPORTATION
BOARD TO CHANGE THE NAME OF JEFFERSON DAVIS
HIGHWAY LOCATED IN CHESTERFIELD COUNTY TO ROUTE 1
On motion of Ms. Haley, seconded by Mr. Ingle, the Board
adopted the following resolution:
WHEREAS, On February 3, 2021, the Virginia House of
Delegates voted to rename all remaining portions of Jefferson
Davis Highway in Virginia to "Emancipation Highway" beginning
on January 1, 2022; and
WHEREAS, the bill was approved by the State Senate on
February 25, 2021 and signed into law by Governor Ralph
Northam; and
WHEREAS, Section 33.2-213 of the Code of Virginia
authorizes the Commonwealth Transportation Board (CTB) to give
suitable names to state highways, bridges, interchanges, and
other transportation facilities and change the names of any
highways, bridges, interchanges, or other transportation
facilities forming a part of the systems of state highways;
and
WHEREAS, Section 33.2-213 provides that the Virginia
Department of Transportation shall place and maintain
appropriate signs indicating the names of highways, bridges,
interchanges, and other transportation facilities named by the
CTB and requires that the costs of producing and placing such
signs shall be paid by the localities in which they are
located.
21-345
6/23/2021
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that Chesterfield County,
in accordance with Section 33.2-213 of the Code of Virginia,
does hereby request that the CTB rename the portion of
Jefferson Davis Highway that lies within the boundaries of the
County "Route 1".
AND, BE IT
FURTHER RESOLVED that Chesterfield County will
assume
the costs for the fabrication and installation of the
signs
for this
naming.
3
Ayes:
Holland,
Winslow, Ingle, Carroll and Haley.
Nays:
None.
12.8.2. SET PUBLIC HEARING
12.B.2.a. TO CONSIDER A LEASE AMENDMENT WITH DOMINION
AVIATION SERVICES, INC. FOR CONSTRUCTION OF AN
AIRCRAFT HANGAR AT THE CHESTERFIELD COUNTY AIRPORT
On motion of Ms. Haley, seconded by Mr. Ingle, the Board set
the date of July 28, 2021, for a public hearing to consider a
lease amendment with Dominion Aviation Services, Inc. for
construction of an aircraft hangar at the Chesterfield County
Airport.
Ayes: Holland, Winslow, Ingle, Carroll and Haley.
Nays: None.
12.B.2.b. TO CONSIDER LEASES FOR INSTALLATION OF SOLAR
POWER GENERATION EQUIPMENT ON COUNTY PROPERTY
On motion of Ms. Haley, seconded by Mr. Ingle, the Board set
the date of July 28, 2021, for a public hearing to consider
leases for installation of solar power generation equipment on
county property.
Ayes: Holland, Winslow, Ingle, Carroll and Haley.
Nays: None.
12.B.2.c. TO CONSIDER ACCEPTANCE AND APPROPRIATION OF
$51.4M FEDERAL ELEMENTARY AND SECONDARY SCHOOL
EMERGENCY RELIEF III (ESSER III) FUNDS
On motion of Ms. Haley, seconded by Mr. Ingle, the Board set
the date of July 28, 2021, for a public hearing to consider
acceptance and appropriation of $51.4 million in Federal
Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief III (ESSER
III) funds in FY2022.
Ayes: Holland, Winslow, Ingle, Carroll and Haley.
Nays: None. )
21-346
6/23/2021
12.8.3. AWARD OF CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT
12.B.3.a. AWARD A CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT AND POTENTIAL CHANGE
ORDERS AND APPROPRIATE RESERVES FOR THE FLEET AND
RADIO SHOP CONSTRUCTION AND RENOVATION PROJECT
Ayes: Holland, Winslow, Ingle, Carroll and Haley.
Nays: None.
12.B.3.b. AWARD OF CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT FOR COUNTY PROJECT
#19-0265, MIDLOTHIAN WATER TANK AND CHESDIN PUMP
STATION BYPASS CONNECTIONS PROJECT
On motion of Ms. Haley, seconded by Mr. Ingle, the Board
authorized the Director of Procurement to award the
construction contract to Waco, Inc. in the amount of $568,687
and execute all necessary change orders up to the full amount
budgeted for the Midlothian Water Tank and Chesdin Pump Station
Bypass Connections project.
Ayes: Holland, Winslow, Ingle, Carroll and Haley.
Nays: None.
12.B.3.c. AWARD OF CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT FOR COUNTY PROJECT
#20-0201, ANDERSON PUMP STATION VFD UPGRADES
PROJECT
On motion of Ms. Haley, seconded by Mr. Ingle, the Board
authorized the Director of Procurement to award the
construction contract to Waco, Inc. in the amount of $747,400
and execute all necessary change orders up to the full amount
budgeted for the Anderson Pump Station VPD Upgrades project.
Ayes: Holland, Winslow, Ingle, Carroll and Haley.
Nays: None.
12.B.3.d. AWARD OF CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT FOR THE ELEHARDT
ROAD (RUTHERS ROAD/POCOSHOCK BOULEVARD TO ELMART
LANE) IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
On motion of Ms. Haley, seconded by Mr. Ingle, the Board
authorized the Director of Procurement to (1) award a
construction contract up to $4,000,000 to the lowest responsive
and responsible bidder and (2) execute all necessary change
orders up to the full amount budgeted for the Elkhardt Road
(Ruthers Road/Pocoshock Boulevard to Elmart Lane) Improvement
Project; and it appropriated $67,518 in anticipated VDOT
reimbursements to reflect the full $2,948,480 of Smart Scale
funding allocated to the project.
Ayes: Holland, Winslow, Ingle, Carroll and Haley.
Nays: None.
21-347
6/23/2021
On motion of Ms. Haley,
seconded by Mr.
Ingle, the Board
authorized the Director
of Procurement
to (1) award a
construction contract up to
$8,772,000 to the
lowest responsive
and responsible bidder and (2) approve all
orders, up to the amount budgeted for the
necessary change
project; and it
authorized the appropriation of $1,066,700 in
Fleet/Radio Shop
reserve funds.
Ayes: Holland, Winslow, Ingle, Carroll and Haley.
Nays: None.
12.B.3.b. AWARD OF CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT FOR COUNTY PROJECT
#19-0265, MIDLOTHIAN WATER TANK AND CHESDIN PUMP
STATION BYPASS CONNECTIONS PROJECT
On motion of Ms. Haley, seconded by Mr. Ingle, the Board
authorized the Director of Procurement to award the
construction contract to Waco, Inc. in the amount of $568,687
and execute all necessary change orders up to the full amount
budgeted for the Midlothian Water Tank and Chesdin Pump Station
Bypass Connections project.
Ayes: Holland, Winslow, Ingle, Carroll and Haley.
Nays: None.
12.B.3.c. AWARD OF CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT FOR COUNTY PROJECT
#20-0201, ANDERSON PUMP STATION VFD UPGRADES
PROJECT
On motion of Ms. Haley, seconded by Mr. Ingle, the Board
authorized the Director of Procurement to award the
construction contract to Waco, Inc. in the amount of $747,400
and execute all necessary change orders up to the full amount
budgeted for the Anderson Pump Station VPD Upgrades project.
Ayes: Holland, Winslow, Ingle, Carroll and Haley.
Nays: None.
12.B.3.d. AWARD OF CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT FOR THE ELEHARDT
ROAD (RUTHERS ROAD/POCOSHOCK BOULEVARD TO ELMART
LANE) IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
On motion of Ms. Haley, seconded by Mr. Ingle, the Board
authorized the Director of Procurement to (1) award a
construction contract up to $4,000,000 to the lowest responsive
and responsible bidder and (2) execute all necessary change
orders up to the full amount budgeted for the Elkhardt Road
(Ruthers Road/Pocoshock Boulevard to Elmart Lane) Improvement
Project; and it appropriated $67,518 in anticipated VDOT
reimbursements to reflect the full $2,948,480 of Smart Scale
funding allocated to the project.
Ayes: Holland, Winslow, Ingle, Carroll and Haley.
Nays: None.
21-347
6/23/2021
12.B.4. AUTHORIZE PARTICIPATION IN THE VIRGINIA RECREATIONAL
TRAILS PROGRAM GRANT (RTP) AND AUTHORIZE THE COUNTY
ADMINISTRATOR TO APPLY FOR THE GRANT, EXECUTE GRANT
AGREEMENT, APPROPRIATE FUNDS, AND EXECUTE
CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT AND POTENTIAL CHANGE ORDERS
FOR THE BROWN AND WILLIAMSON CONSERVATION AREA
PROJECT
On motion
of Ms. Haley, seconded
by Mr.
Ingle,
the
Board
adopted the
following resolution:
WHEREAS, under the provisions of Recreational Trails
Program, [RTP], federal funding assistance is requested to aid
in financing the cost of the construction and/or rehabilitation
of recreational trails and trail related facilities; and
WHEREAS, Chesterfield County considers it in the best
public interest to complete the Brown and Williamson
Conservation Area Recreational Trail Project described in the
application, proposal description and environmental screening
application; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the County
Administrator be authorized to make formal application to
Department of Conservation and Recreation [DCR] for funding
assistance; and
WHEREAS, any fund assistance received be used for
implementation and completion of Brown and Williamson
Conservation Area Recreational Trail Project within the
specified timeframe; and
WHEREAS, Chesterfield County hereby certifies that
project funding is committed and will be derived from Parks
and Recreation Capital Improvement Program [CIP]; and
WHEREAS, we acknowledge that we are responsible for
supporting all non-cash commitments to this project should they
not materialize; and
WHEREAS, we are aware that the grant, if approved by the
Federal Highway Administration, will be paid on an 80-20
reimbursement basis. This means we may only request payment
after eligible and allowable costs have already been paid and
remitted to our vendors and evidence of such has been provided
to DCR in the format required by the project agreement; and
WHEREAS, this resolution becomes part of a formal
application to the Virginia Department of Conservation &
Recreation; and
WHEREAS, we acknowledge that we are responsible for
compliance with the National Environmental Policy Act,
Endangered Species Act, Historic Preservation Act and all
applicable state and federal laws provided appropriate
opportunity for public comment on this application; and
WHEREAS, we acknowledge that appropriate opportunity for
public comment has been provided on this application and
evidence of such is a required component for approval; and this
21-348
6/23/2021
resolution was adopted by the Board of Supervisors during the
meeting held on June 23, 2021 at the Chesterfield County
Government Complex, Public Meeting Room, Chesterfield,
Virginia 23832.
Ayes: Holland, Winslow, Ingle, Carroll and Haley.
Nays: None.
/ 12.8.5. ACCEPTANCE AND APPROPRIATION OF FEDERAL VICTIMS OF
(V CRIME ACT (VOCA) REVENUE TO CONTINUE FUNDING 2 iULL-
TIME POSITIONS IN THE DOMESTIC AND SEXUAL VIOLENCE
RESOURCE CENTER (DSVRC)
On motion of Ms. Haley, seconded by Mr. Ingle, the Board
accepted and appropriated $49,622 in federal victims of Crime
Act (VOLA) revenue to continue funding two full-time positions
in the Domestic and Sexual Violence Resource Center (DSVRC).
Ayes: Holland, Winslow, Ingle, Carroll and Haley.
Nays: None.
12.8.6. JAIL MENTAL HEALTH CONTINUATION GRANT PY2022
On motion of Ms. Haley, seconded by Mr. Ingle, the Board
authorized the County Administrator to accept and appropriate
the FY2022 DCJS grant award of $324,073 for continuation of
the Jail Mental Health Program at the Chesterfield County Jail.
Ayes: Holland, Winslow, Ingle, Carroll and Haley.
Nays: None.
12.8.7. AUTHORIZE THE RECEIPT OF $139,237 IN ADDITIONAL
FY2022 FUNDING FROM THE DEPARTMENT OF BEHAVIORAL
HEALTH F DEVELOPMENTAL SERVICES AND 2 NEW FULL-TIME
POSITIONS
On motion of Ms. Haley, seconded by Mr. Ingle, the Board
approved the receipt of funding and two additional full-time
positions for the Community Services Board to expand Step 3
STEP VA Outpatient Behavioral Health Services.
Ayes: Holland, Winslow, Ingle, Carroll and Haley.
Nays: None.
12.5.8. ACCEPT AND APPROPRIATE FEDERAL CORONAVIRUS RESPONSE
AND RELIEF SUPPLEMENTARY APPROPRIATIONS ACT (CRRSA)
GRANT TOTALING 5293.504
On motion of Ms. Haley, seconded by Mr. Ingle, the Board
accepted and appropriated Federal Coronavirus Response and
Relief Supplementary Appropriations Act (CRRSA) Grant Totaling
$293,504 in FY2021.
Ayes: Holland, Winslow, Ingle, Carroll and Haley.
Nays: None.
21-349
6/23/2021
12.B.9. AUTHORIZE A ONE-TIME WAIVER IN FY2021 OF THE
ROLLOVER CAP ON DISTRICT IMPROVEMENT FUNDS TO
MAKE AVAILABLE IN FY2022 FUNDS THAT WERE UNABLE
TO BE SPENT DUE TO THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC
On motion of Ms. Haley, seconded by Mr. Ingle, the Board
authorized a one-time waiver in FY2021 of the rollover cap on
District Improvement Funds (DIF) to make available in FY2022
funds that were unable to be spent due to the COVID-19
pandemic.
Ayes: Holland, Winslow, Ingle, Carroll and Haley.
Nays: None.
12.B.10. APPROVAL OF COUNTY FY2021 YEAR-END ADJUSTMENTS
AND RESERVE REQUESTS
On motion of Ms. Haley, seconded by Mr. Ingle, the Board:
1. Authorized the County Administrator to assign to a revenue
stabilization reserve all unspent, or otherwise
unreserved, FY2021 appropriations that are in excess of
the items detailed in the attached schedules;
2. Appropriated revenues and expenditures for specific
programs as well as authorize reallocations among General
Fund departments and related funds and make adjustments
to revenues and expenditures as outlined on the attached
Schedule A;
3. Appropriated revenues and expenditures and authorize
other adjustments for specific programs, projects, and
non -General Fund departments as outlined on the attached
Schedule B;
4. Authorized the County Administrator to assign and
reappropriate various revenues and unspent expenditures
contingent upon positive results of operations as
determined by the County's financial audit, as outlined
on the attached Schedule C, and reserve all remaining
funds for potential reappropriation during FY2022;
additional requests to commit remaining funds will be
brought to the Board of Supervisors following the
financial audit. and
S. Amended the FY2021 Appropriations Resolution as follows
Schools Operating Fund
Transfer from School Operating $(62,500)
Transfer from CIP $62,500
Transfer from School Operating $(175,000)
Transfer from Food Service $175,000
Total Change - J
(It is noted Schedules A, B, and C are filed with the papers
of this Board.)
Ayes: Holland, Winslow, Ingle, Carroll and Haley.
Nays: None.
21-350
6/23/2021
12.8.11. APPROVAL OF SCHOOLS FY2021 YEAR-END ADJUSTMENTS
AND RESERVE REQUESTS
On motion of Ms. Haley, seconded by Mr. Ingle, the Board:
1. Appropriated revenues and expenditures and authorized
other adjustments for the school division as outlined in
Schedule A, along with any other associated transfers
required as a result of the requested actions;
2. Postponed assignment and re -appropriation of the reserve
requests summarized in Schedule B until after the
completion of the financial audit;
3. Assigned and re -appropriated the reserve requests as
listed in Schedule C; and
4. Authorized the County Administrator to assign to a school
revenue stabilization reserve all unspent, or otherwise
unreserved, funds from FY2021 in excess of the $23.8
million summarized in Schedule B following the completion
of the financial audit.
(It is noted Schedules A, B, and C are filed with the papers
of this Board.)
Ayes: Holland, Winslow, Ingle, Carroll and Haley.
Nays: None.
12.8.12. AUTHORIZE THE RECEIPT AND APPROPRIATION OF
$8,383,893 IN FEDERAL EMERGENCY RENTAL ASSISTANCE
(ERA) FUNDING FROM THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY
FOR USE BY THE COUNTY TO SUPPORT COSTS ASSOCIATED
WITH EMERGENCY RENT AND UTILITY RELIEF ASSISTANCE
AND HOMELESSNESS PREVENTION
On motion of Ms. Haley, seconded by Mr. Ingle, the Board
authorized the receipt and appropriation of $8,383,893 in
Federal Emergency Rental Assistance (ERA) funding from the U.S.
Department of Treasury for use by the county to support costs
associated with emergency rent and utility relief assistance
and homelessness prevention.
Ayes: Holland, Winslow, Ingle, Carroll and Haley.
Nays: None.
12.8.13. DESIGNATION OF CHESTERFIELD REVENUE SHARING
PRn.TF.PTS
On motion of Ms. Haley, seconded by Mr. Ingle, the Board
approved Revenue Sharing Plan Options 1 and 2 (Attachment B)
i and included the $10 million in sources and uses in the Capital
` Improvement Program. (It is noted a copy of Attachment B is
filed with the papers of this Board.)
And, further, the Board adopted the following resolution:
21-351
6/23/2021
WHEREAS, Section 33.2-357 of the Code of Virginia permits
the Commonwealth Transportation Board to make an equivalent
matching allocation to any locality for designations by the
governing body of up to $10,000,000 in funds received by it
during the current fiscal year for use by the Commonwealth
Transportation Board to construct, maintain, or improve
primary and secondary highway systems within such County; and
WHEREAS, the Virginia Department of Transportation has
notified the county that $5 million is the maximum amount of
Chesterfield County funds that can be matched by the state
during FY2023 and FY2024; and
WHEREAS, the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors
will make available $5 million for the Chesterfield Revenue
Sharing Program with the adoption of the FY2023 and FY2024
Appropriation Resolution and other Board action.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chesterfield
County Board of Supervisors appropriates and/or transfers $5
million to be matched by the State for the FY2023 and FY2024
Chesterfield Revenue Sharing Program.
AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the FY2021 matched funds
be allocated to the following projects:
$10,000,000 Woolridge Road (Rt. 288 - Old Hundred Road)
Extension - $5,000,000-VDOT and $5,000,000 -County
AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the FY2024 matched funds
be allocated to the following projects:
$241,618 Woolridge Road (Rt. 288 - Old Hundred Road)
Extension - $120,809-VDOT and $120,809 -County
$2,000,000 Alverser Drive/Old Buckingham Road Roundabout -
$1,000,000-VDOT and $1,000,000 -County
$2,100,000 Turner Road/Jessup Road Roundabout - $1,050,000-
VDOT and $1,050,000 -County
$2,000,000 Route 360/Courthouse Road R -Cut - $1,000,000-VDOT
and $1,000,000 -County
$2,058,382 Matoaca Road/Woodpecker Road Roundabout -
$1,029,191-VDOT and $1,029,191 -County
$900,000 Dundas Road (Rt. 1 - Wentworth Street) Bike and
Pedestrian Improvements - $450,000-VDOT and
$450,000 -County
$700,000 Edenberry Drive/Farnham Drive Mini Roundabout -
$350,000-VDOT and $350,000 -County
AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the County Administrator
or Deputy County Administrator are authorized to execute all
agreements and/or addendums for any approved projects with the
Virginia Department of Transportation.
And, further, the Board adopted the following resolution:
21-352
6/23/2021
J
'
WHEREAS, Section 33.2-357 of the Code of Virginia permits
the Commonwealth Transportation Board to make an equivalent
matching allocation to any locality for designations by the
governing body of up to $10,000,000 in funds received by it
during the current fiscal year for use by the Commonwealth
Transportation Board to construct, maintain, or improve
primary and secondary highway systems within such County; and
WHEREAS, the Virginia Department of Transportation has
notified the county that $5 million is the maximum amount of
Chesterfield County funds that can be matched by the state
during FY2027 and FY2028; and
WHEREAS, the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors
will make available $5 million for the Chesterfield Revenue
Sharing Program with the adoption of the FY2027 and FY2028
Appropriation Resolution and other Board action.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chesterfield
County Board of Supervisors appropriates and/or transfers $5
million to be matched by the State for the FY2027 and FY2028
Chesterfield Revenue Sharing Program.
AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the FY2027 matched funds
be allocated to the following projects:
$2,000,000 Alverser Drive/Old Buckingham Road Roundabout -
$1,000,000-VDOT and $1,000,000 -County
$2,000,000 Turner Road/Jessup Road Roundabout - $1,000,000-
VDOT and $1,000,000 -County
$2,000,000 Route 360/Courthouse Road R -Cut - $1,000,000-VDOT
and $1,000,000 -County
$2,000,000 Matoaca Road/Woodpecker Road Roundabout -
$1,000,000-VDOT and $1,000,000 -County
$1,353,496 Dundas Road (Rt. 1 - Wentworth Street) Bike and
Pedestrian Improvements - $676,748-VDOT and
$676,748 -County
$646,504 Edenberry Drive/Farnham Drive Mini Roundabout -
$323,252-VDOT and $323,252 -County
AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the FY2028 matched funds
be allocated to the following projects:
$2,173,922 Alverser Drive/Old Buckingham Road Roundabout -
$1,167,241-VDOT and $1,167,241 -County
$2,000,000 Turner Road/Jessup Road Roundabout - $1,000,000-
VDOT and $1,000,000 -County
$2,000,000 Route 360/Courthouse Road R -Cut - $1,000,000-VDOT
and $1,000,000 -County
$2,000,000 Matoaca Road/Woodpecker Road Roundabout -
$1,000,000-VDOT and $1,000,000 -County
21-353
6/23/2021
$1,426,078 Dundas Road (Rt. 1 - Wentworth Street) Bike and
Pedestrian Improvements - $713,039-VDOT and
$713,039 -County
$400,000 Edenberry Drive/Farnham Drive Mini Roundabout -
$200,000-VDOT and $200,000 -County
AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the County Administrator
or Deputy County Administrator are authorized to execute all
agreements and/or addendums for any approved projects with the
Virginia Department of Transportation.
Ayes: Holland, Winslow, Ingle, Carroll and Haley.
Nays: None.
12.B.14. APPROVAL OF EXTENSION OF THE ROUTE 1 INCENTIVE
POLICY
On motion of Ms. Haley, seconded by Mr. Ingle, the Board
approved an extension of the Route 1 Revitalization Incentive
Program to December 31, 2021.
Ayes: Holland, Winslow, Ingle, Carroll and Haley.
Nays: None.
12.8.15. STREET NAME CHANGE OF GRYPHON ROAD TO OLDE
STONEGATE ROAD
On motion of Ms. Haley, seconded by Mr. Ingle, the Board
approved the renaming of Gryphon Road in Powderham, Section B,
to Olde Stonegate Road. The Tax ID for the one affected parcel
is 730718874300000 (2706 Gryphon Road).
Ayes: Holland, Winslow, Ingle, Carroll and Haley.
Nays: None.
12.3.16. ACCEPTANCE OF STATE ROADS
On motion of Ms. Haley, seconded by Mr.
Ingle, the Board
adopted the following resolution:
WHEREAS, the streets described below
are shown on a plat
recorded in the Clerk's Office of the
Circuit Court of
Chesterfield County; and
WHEREAS, the Resident Engineer
for the Virginia
Department of Transportation has advised this
Board the streets
meet the requirements established by the
Subdivision Street
Requirements of the Virginia Department of
Transportation.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that
this Board requests
\
i
the Virginia Department of Transportation
to add the streets
`•/
described below to the secondary system
of state highways,
pursuant to Sections 33.2-705 and 33.2-334,
Code of Virginia,
and the Department's Subdivision Street Requirements.
21-354
6/23/2021
AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that this Board guarantees
a clear and unrestricted right-of-way, as described, and any
necessary easements for cuts, fills and drainage.
AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that a certified copy of this
resolution be forwarded to the Resident Engineer for the
Virginia Department of Transportation.
Project/Subdivision: Watermark - Kingsland Glen Drive - Phase IIA
and Phase IIB
Type Change to the Secondary System miles of State Highways:
Reason for Change: New Subdivision Street
Pursuant to Code of Virginia Statute: 533.2-705, 33.2-334
Street Name and/or Route Number
• Kingsland Glen Drive, State Route Number 5445
From: 0.18 miles west of Crosswinds Boulevard, (Route 7594)
To: 0.15 miles east of Roseville Drive, (Route 7513), a
distance of 0.07 miles
Recordation Reference: Deed Book 8157, Page 0998
Right of Way width (feet) = 70
• Kingsland Glen Drive, State Route Number 5445
From: 0.09 miles west of Crosswinds Boulevard, (Route 7594)
To: 0.18 miles west of Crosswinds Boulevard, (Route 7594),
distance of 0.09 miles.
Recordation Reference: Deed Book 8157, Page 0998
Right of Way width (feet) = 70
• Kingsland Glen Drive, State Route Number 5445
ff From: 0.02 miles west of Crosswinds Boulevard, (Route 7594)
To: 0.09 miles west of Crosswinds Boulevard, (Route 7594), a
distance of 0.07 miles.
Recordation Reference: Deed Book 8157, Page 0998
Right of Way width (feet) - 70
And, further, the Board adopted the following resolution
WHEREAS, the streets described below are shown on a plat
recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of
Chesterfield County; and
WHEREAS, the Resident Engineer for the Virginia
Department of Transportation has advised this Board the streets
meet the requirements established by the Subdivision Street
Requirements of the Virginia Department of Transportation.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that this Board requests
the Virginia Department of Transportation to add the streets
described below to the secondary system of state highways,
pursuant to Sections 33.2-705 and 33.2-334, Code of of gVir�inia,
and the Department's Subdivision Street Requirements.
AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that this Board guarantees
a clear and unrestricted right-of-way, as described, and any
necessary easements for cuts, fills and drainage.
AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that a certified copy of this
resolution be forwarded to the Resident Engineer for the
Virginia Department of Transportation.
21-355
6/23/2021
Project/Subdivision: Foxfield Section 3
Type Change to the Secondary System miles of State Highways:
Addition
Reason for Change: New Subdivision Street
Pursuant to Code of Virginia Statute: 533.2-705, 33.2-334
Street Name and/or Route Number
• Swift Fox Drive, State Route Number 7288
From: 0.09 miles northwest of Trail Ride Drive, (Route 7289)
To: Mossy Oak Road, (Route 8129), a distance of 0.03 miles
Recordation Reference: Plat Book 219, Page 70
Right of Way width (feet) = 60
• Swift Fox Drive, State Route Number 7288
From: Mossy Oak Road, (Route 8129)
To: 0.01 miles northwest of Mossy Oak Road, (Route 8129), a
distance of 0.01 miles
Recordation Reference: Plat Book 219, Page 70
Right of Way width (feet) = 60
Mossy Oak Road, State Route Number 8129
From: Swift Fox Drive, (Route 7288)
To: 0.21 miles northeast of Swift Fox Drive, (Route 7288), a
distance of 0.21 miles
Recordation Reference: Plat Book 219, Page 70
Right of way width (feet) = 40
• Mossy Oak Road, State Route Number 8129
From: 0.21 miles northeast of Swift Fox Drive, (Route 7288)
To: The end -of -maintenance, a distance of 0.01 miles
Recordation Reference: Plat Book 219, Page 70
Right of Way width (feet) = 40
And, further, the Board adopted the following resolution
WHEREAS, the streets described below are shown on a plat
recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of
Chesterfield County; and
WHEREAS, the Resident Engineer for the Virginia
Department of Transportation has advised this Board the streets
meet the requirements established by the Subdivision Street
Requirements of the Virginia Department of Transportation.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that this Board requests
the Virginia Department of Transportation to add the streets
described below to the secondary system of state highways,
pursuant to Sections 33.2-705 and 33.2-334, Code of Virginia,
and the Department's Subdivision Street Requirements.
AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that this Board guarantees
a clear and unrestricted right-of-way, as described, and any
necessary easements for cuts, fills and drainage.
AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that a certified copy of this
resolution be forwarded to the Resident Engineer for the
Virginia Department of Transportation.
21-356
6/23/2021
Reason for Change: New Subdivision Street
Pursuant to Code of Virginia Statute: 533.2-705, 33.2-334
Street Name and/or Route Number
• Ellerby Drive, State Route Number 7765
From: 0.03 miles northeast of Glensford Drive, (Route 7764)
To: Ellerby Place, (Route 8287), a distance of 0.03 miles
Recordation Reference: Plat Book 268, Page 4
Right of Way width (feet) = 50
• Ellerby Drive, State Route Number 7765
From: Ellerby Court, (Route 8288)
To: Old Westridge Drive, (Route 8198), a distance of 0.05 miles
Recordation Reference: Plat Book 268, Page 4
Right of way width (feet) = 40
• Ellerby Drive, State Route Number 7765
From: Ellerby Place, (Route 8287)
TO: Ellerby Court, (Route 8288), a distance of 0.05 miles
Recordation Reference: Plat Book 268, Page 4
Right of Way width (feet) = 50
• Ellerby Drive, State Route Number 7765
From: Old Westridge Drive, (Route 8198)
To: The cul-de-sac, a distance of 0.10 miles
Recordation Reference: Plat Book 268, Page 4
Right of Way width (feet) = 40
• Old Westridge Drive, State Route Number 8198
From: Ellerby Drive, (Route 7765)
To: 0.02 miles east, at the beginning of existing Old Westridge
Drive, (Route 8198), a distance of 0.02 miles
Recordation Reference: Plat Book 268, Page 4
Right of Way width (feet) = 40
• Old Westridge Drive, State Route Number 8198
From: Ellerby Drive, (Route 7765)
To: The cul-de-sac, a distance of 0.04 miles
Recordation Reference: Plat Book 268, Page 4
Right of Way width (feet) = 40
• Ellerby Place, State Route Number 8287
From: Ellerby Drive, (Route 7765)
To: The cul-de-sac, a distance of 0.03 miles
Recordation Reference: Plat Book 268, Page 4
Right of Way width (feet) = 40
• Ellerby Court, State Route Number 8288
From: Ellerby Drive, (Route 7765)
To: The cul-de-sac, a distance of 0.05 miles
Recordation Reference: Plat Book 268, Page 4
Right of Way width (feet) = 40
And, further, the Board adopted the following resolution:
WHEREAS, the streets described below are shown on a plat
recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of
Chesterfield County; and
21-357
6/23/2021
WHEREAS, the Resident Engineer for the Virginia
Department of Transportation has advised this Board the streets
meet the requirements established by the Subdivision Street
Requirements of the Virginia Department of Transportation.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that this Board requests
the Virginia Department of Transportation to add the streets
described below to the secondary system of state highways,
pursuant to Sections 33.2-705 and 33.2-334, Code of Virginia,
and the Department's Subdivision Street Requirements.
AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that this Board guarantees
a clear and unrestricted right-of-way, as described, and any
necessary easements for cuts, fills and drainage.
AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that a certified copy of this
resolution be forwarded to the Resident Engineer for the
Virginia Department of Transportation.
Project/Subdivision: Willow Creek Section 5
Tvoe Chance to the Secondary Svstem miles of State Hiqhways:
Addition
Reason for Change: New Subdivision Street
Pursuant to Code of Virginia Statute: 533.2-705, 33.2-334
Street Name and/or Route Number
• Lost Parrish Drive, State Route Number 8165
From: Avening Road, (Route 7588)
To: Stone Church Drive, (Route 8289), a distance of 0.06
miles
Recordation Reference: Plat Book 258, Page 35
Right of Way width (feet) = 44
Lost Parrish Drive, State Route Number 8165
From: Stone Church Drive, (Route 8289)
To: The end -of -maintenance, a distance of 0.03 miles
Recordation Reference: Plat Book 258, Page 35
Right of Way width (feet) = 44
• Lost Parrish Drive, State Route Number 8165
From: 0.02 miles south of Jordans Parrish Road, (Route 8162)
To: Avening Road, (Route 7588), a distance of 0.13 miles
Recordation Reference: Plat Book 258, Page 35
Right of Way width (feet) = 44
Avening Road, State Route Number 7588
From: Lost Parrish Drive, (Route 8165)
To: Existing Avening Road, (Route 7588), a distance of 0.09
miles
Recordation Reference: Plat Book 258, Page 35
Right of Way width (feet) = 40
• Stone Church Drive, State Route Number 8289
From: Lost Parrish Drive, (Route 8165)
To: Longtown Drive, (Route 7678), a distance of 0.03 miles
Recordation Reference: Plat Book 258, Page 35
Right of Way width (feet) = 44
21-358
6/23/2021
• Stone Church Drive, State Route Number 8289
From: Longtown Drive, (Route 7678)
To: The cul-de-sac, a distance of 0.02 miles
Recordation Reference: Plat Book 258, Page 35
Right of way width (feet) = 44
• Longtown Drive, State Route Number 7678
From: Stone Church Drive, (Route 8269)
To: Longtown Court, (Route 8290), a distance of 0.08 miles
Recordation Reference: Plat Book 258, Page 35
Right of Way width (feet) = 44
• Longtown Drive, State Route Number 7678
From: Longtown Court, (Route 8290)
To: Longtown Loop, (Route 8291), a distance of 0.05 miles
Recordation Reference: Plat Book 258, Page 35
Right of Way width (feet) = 44
• Longtown Drive, State Route Number 7678
From: Longtown Loop, (Route 8291)
To: Longtown Loop, (Route 8291), a distance of 0.02 miles
Recordation Reference: Plat Book 258, Page 35
Right of Way width (feet) = 44
• Longtown Drive, State Route Number 7678
From: Longtown Loop, (Route 8291)
To: Existing Longtown Drive, (Route 7678), a distance of
0.04 miles
Recordation Reference: Plat Book 258, Page 35
Right of Way width (feet) = 44
• Longtown Court, State Route Number 8290
From: Longtown Drive, (Route 7678)
To: The cul-de-sac, a distance of 0.04 miles
Recordation Reference: Plat Book 258, Page 35
Right of Way width (feet) = 40
• Longtown Loop, State Route Number 8291
From: Longtown Drive, (Route 7676)
To: Longtown Drive, (Route 7678), a distance of 0.04 miles
Recordation Reference: Plat Book 258, Page 35
Right of Way width (feet) = 65
Ayes: Holland, Winslow, Ingle, Carroll and Haley.
Nays: None.
12.C. TRANSFER $5 MILLION TO THE EDA TO PURCHASE PROPERTY
COMMONLY KNOWN AS SOUTHSIDE SPEEDWAY
Mr. Garrett Hart, Director of Economic Development, provided
the Board with an overview of the opportunity to acquire the
former Southside Speedway property. He provided details of the
purchase of three parcels totaling 47,139 acres on Genito Road
and Oak Lake Boulevard. He stated the purchase price is $4.5
million including a six percent commission. He further stated
the property is zoned C-5, which is the highest and heaviest
commercial zoning in the county.
21-359
6/23/2021
In response to Ms. Haley's request for examples of C-5 zoning,
Mr. Hart stated C-5 zoning would allow heavy retail operations
such as car sales, car shops, engine mechanics, manufacturing,
machine shops, sheet metaling rolling, wire manufacturing,
umbrella manufacturing, recycling, compounding of paper, and
mini storage. He further stated there are hundreds of items
that could go there. He then reviewed the goals of acquiring
the property, which are to enhance the experience for citizens
living in the area and using River City Sportsplex; enhance
the experience for visitors to River City Sportsplex; and
increase the tax base and create jobs. He stated another goal
is to protect the area from non -complementary C-5 uses. He
further stated through this transaction, the Board would
control how the property is developed and used in the future.
He stated this would be a public process which would allow
citizens to provide input on the property's use. He further
stated should the property go on the open market and be sold
to a private developer who intends to take advantage of the C-
5 zoning, there is no requirement for a public hearing or
community meeting. He stated the county's purchase of the
property would allow for citizen input, but a private sector
transaction would not. He further stated the next goal is to
honor the history of Southside Speedway, which is one of the
county's oldest tourism attractions. He stated the last goal,
as with all property acquisitions, is to recoup the county's
investment. He further stated the goal is to incentivize the
private sector to create a tax base and jobs, not compete with
the private sector on real estate. He then discussed the next
steps of the acquisition, the first of which is to work with
Parks and Recreation, Planning staff, the Planning Commission,
and the Board of Supervisors on a plan of development. He
stated this process will take as long as the Board wishes, and
it will involve community meetings and public hearings. He
further stated the Planning Commission and Planning staff are
working on a Genito Small Area Plan update to the Comprehensive
Plan, and this property and its future uses will become part
of that discussion. He stated this will most likely be the
first opportunity for citizens to provide input on the future
uses of the property. He further stated should the Board decide
the uses require rezoning, the rezoning process will provide
multiple opportunities for the public to provide input on the
redevelopment and use of the property.
In response to Mr. Winslow's question relative to how the
county became aware of the property being on the market, Mr.
Hart stated the property was initially under contract by
Crescent Development who was considering a multi -family,
primarily residential use on the property. He further stated
input from Economic Development was required in order to
downzone the property. He stated the developer contacted
Economic Development, the Planning Commissioner, Mr. Winslow,
and Planning staff who concurred that a residential community
encircled by industrial uses would not align with the
Comprehensive Plan. He further stated the company decided it
could not develop the property as it intended, and then
discussions began about the county's interest in purchasing
the property. He stated the Economic Development Authority
(EDA) would be the tool to accomplish the task.
21-360
6/23/2021
In response to Mr. Winslow's question about the future use of
the property, Mr. Hart stated nothing has been predetermined.
He further stated the property has opportunity, but it would
be the vision of the Board to determine how the opportunity is
used.
Mr. Winslow expressed appreciation for Mr. Hart's mention of
the Genito Special Focus Area Plan. He stated there are a
number of different land uses in the area, and he credited Ms.
Gloria Freye, Clover Hill District Planning Commissioner and
Chair of the Planning Commission, for directing staff to make
it a much more visibly pleasing area with the goal of raising
property values. He further stated he believes it will be a
nice community project after receiving citizen input.
Ms. Haley acknowledged the many citizens committed to saving
Southside Speedway. She stated there is nothing in the purchase
that would prohibit the Board from looking at an opportunity
to continue the speedway or some type of venue that expands on
it. She further stated the county's purchase would allow the
Board to control the opportunities and receive citizen input.
She expressed appreciation for the interest and looked forward
to community conversations.
Mr. Hart concurred and stated if the Board wishes to
investigate the continuation of the operation of the facility,
it would be his role to assist anyone who wishes to present
that opportunity to the Board.
In response to Mr. Ingle's request for clarification of Mr.
Hart's role, Mr. Hart stated he was speaking as the Director
of Economic Development reporting on the transaction. He
further stated the EDA would be the tool to purchase the
property.
In response to Mr. Ingle's question relative to the EDA's role
in the transaction, Mr. Hart concurred that the EDA would only
become involved if the Board asked it to facilitate the
purchase and, until then, it has no role in the transaction.
Mr. Ingle stated he has heard from at least one group
interested in preserving the racetrack, and he has received
assurances from Board members and the Department of Economic
Development that the racetrack use has not been prohibited if
a way can be found to make it work. He further stated the Board
does not want a defunct racetrack but having a viable racetrack
that could also serve as a concert venue or some other asset
to enhance River City Sportsplex is not prohibited.
Mr. Hart concurred and stated additional opportunities like
The Lake and other venues that citizens and visitors could
enjoy while participating in tournaments is a goal for the
whole area.
Mr. Ingle stated he received a question relative to why the
item was originally on the Consent Agenda. He further stated
at the time it was placed on the Consent Agenda, the Board did
not ascertain that there would be concern from the citizens.
He stated once the Board became aware of citizen concerns and
the need for further explanation, the Board agreed to move the
21-361
6/23/2021
item from the Consent Agenda. He further stated he received
another question relative to who requested the purchase.
Mr. Hart concurred that the request came from the current
contract holder. He stated the county has a contract with the
current contract holder to assume the existing contract. Mr.
Hart further concurred that the current contract holder reached
out to the county.
In response to Mr. Ingle's question relative to why public
comment was not allowed, Mr. Mincks stated the decision before
the Board was not a public comment item, nor was it a public
hearing item. He further stated there will be other discussions
that will indeed involve the public, but this particular item
does not require that. He stated there were a variety of
decision items on the agenda that were not open for discussion,
and the purchase of the Southside Speedway property happened
to be one of them. He further stated based on the commitment
voiced by the Board, there will be discussions with the public
at the appropriate time.
Mr. Ingle stated he received a question relative to the
definition of the EDA facilitating the transaction. He further
stated the ERA's role is to help with financing or facilitating
any kind of transaction that a private entity would come to
ask them for help with financing.
Mr. Hart concurred with Mr. Ingle's definition.
Mr. Ingle stated the EDA would facilitate any type of
acquisition of property that a Board member or the Board would
direct them to look at to target new businesses to increase
the tax base.
Mr. Hart concurred.
Mr. Ingle stated that is really the full role of the EDA in
this transaction.
Mr. Hart concurred and stated the ERA's role is to assist the
Board in creating jobs, increasing capital investment, and
helping businesses, all of which is accomplished through
financing, development activities, and incentives. He further
stated as with all real estate transactions, the EDA is
assisting at the request of the Board to do the real estate
transaction.
In response to Mr. Ingle's question relative to when the tax
dollars would be recovered and how long the process should
take, Mr. Hart stated it depends on many factors. By way of
example, he discussed Cloverleaf Mall, which took five years
to figure out the development contract before it could be sold.
He stated working with the public, working on the rezoning
case, getting community input, issuing a request for
information (RFI), soliciting developers, and getting the
right developer in place took five years. He further stated
Kroger broke ground 36 months later for a total of eight years.
He stated depending on what process the Board wants to use for
developing the parcel, it could take one or two years which
would be the starting point. He further stated the purchase
21-362
6/23/2021
price is a fair purchase price, the value of the property is
just above the purchase price, and the property is positioned
to sell very quickly if the Board chooses.
Mr. Hart stated Mr. Ingle's remarks were all correct, and it
was a fair price. He further stated eight comparable properties
`` were analyzed for similar sales in the last three years, and
the lowest price was $118,000 per acre while the highest price
was approximately $396,000 per acre. He stated the average was
approximately $160,000 per acre, and the county is paying under
$100,000 per acre.
Mr. Ingle stated the number he had was $92,462 per acre, to
which Mr. Hart agreed.
In response to Mr. Carroll's question relative to what would
happen if the county chose not to purchase the property, Mr.
Hart stated the county is under contract to assume the contract
that closes at the end of June, and there is a $100,000 deposit
at risk.
Mr. Carroll stated by purchasing the property, the county would
be preventing another purchaser from destroying Southside
Speedway and would be giving the community the opportunity to
provide input. He further stated there would be not only a
public hearing, but also community meetings. He stated if there
was an entity interested in revitalization of Southside
[ Speedway, that would be an opportunity for them too. He further
stated if the county does not purchase the property, supporters
of Southside Speedway could be disappointed if a different
purchaser levels the track and does something else with the
property.
21-363
6/23/2021
In response to Mr. Ingle's question, Mr. Hart concurred the
property is open to anyone who wants to purchase it. He stated
once the Board determines what it wants on the property, it is
an open market. He further stated the Board would want an open
market in order to get the highest and best response.
Mr. Ingle stated he received a question relative to who
determines the appropriate use of the property. He further
stated the Board makes the vote, but it does so in conjunction
with listening to the citizens and in consultation with the
community. He stated he received a question relative to the
assessed value versus the contract price. He further stated he
was told by a citizen that the assessed value is $1.7 million,
and the county is looking to purchase the property for $4.5
million. He stated he understood the assessed value was based
on today's use with today's facilities under today's zoning,
and it was also worth what someone is willing to pay for it.
He further stated the current contract was originally written
for $6,360,725 for 42.096 acres, and the new contract is for
$4.5 million and $270,000 in commissions for 47.139 acres,
which is significantly under what someone else was willing to
pay. He stated they would have had to have a different use,
and the Board would not have allowed it, which does affect the
price and is why it came down. He inquired of Mr. Hart if he
had stated any of that incorrectly.
Mr. Hart stated Mr. Ingle's remarks were all correct, and it
was a fair price. He further stated eight comparable properties
`` were analyzed for similar sales in the last three years, and
the lowest price was $118,000 per acre while the highest price
was approximately $396,000 per acre. He stated the average was
approximately $160,000 per acre, and the county is paying under
$100,000 per acre.
Mr. Ingle stated the number he had was $92,462 per acre, to
which Mr. Hart agreed.
In response to Mr. Carroll's question relative to what would
happen if the county chose not to purchase the property, Mr.
Hart stated the county is under contract to assume the contract
that closes at the end of June, and there is a $100,000 deposit
at risk.
Mr. Carroll stated by purchasing the property, the county would
be preventing another purchaser from destroying Southside
Speedway and would be giving the community the opportunity to
provide input. He further stated there would be not only a
public hearing, but also community meetings. He stated if there
was an entity interested in revitalization of Southside
[ Speedway, that would be an opportunity for them too. He further
stated if the county does not purchase the property, supporters
of Southside Speedway could be disappointed if a different
purchaser levels the track and does something else with the
property.
21-363
6/23/2021
Mr. Hart stated based on the volume of requests for Industrial
properties with 100,000- or 200,000 -square -foot buildings for
warehouse and distribution, he could see the property being
sold very quickly.
Mr. Carroll stated some other properties such as Meadowville
Landing have been flying off the shelf, and purchasers have
been building big warehouses and bringing jobs and materials
to the county.
Mr. Hart stated properties of this type sell quickly once they
go on the market. He further stated he could not say what the
purchaser would use the property for, but with the current C-
5 zoning he would expect to see flex industrial or office or
flex warehouse on the property very quickly, and it would
probably go to the group willing to pay the current owners the
highest price.
Mr. Carroll stated it would be prudent for the Board to
intervene and avoid a situation where the community would not
have any input on what happens with the property. He further
stated he was asked by several people to defer Board action,
but he did not want to lose the opportunity and risk the
property getting leveled by another purchaser. He asked the
Southside Speedway supporters present in the audience to stand,
and he noted there were many supporters present. He expressed
appreciation for their interest and stated he looks forward to
community input in the future.
On motion of Mr. Winslow, seconded by Ms. Haley, the Board
approved the transfer of up to $5 million to the Economic
Development Authority to support the purchase of property
commonly known as Southside Speedway.
Ayes: Holland, Winslow, Ingle, Carroll and Haley.
Nays: None.
12.D. REVISIONS TO 2021 RULES OF PROCEDURE TO INCORPORATE
BEST PRACTICES UTILIZED DURING COVID-19 EMERGENCY
Dr. Casey stated the pandemic necessitated a way for citizens
to provide input without attending Board meetings in person
and, accordingly, a digital meeting portal was created to
receive citizen comments. He further stated because the
declaration of local emergency would be expiring soon and the
Continuity of Government ordinance would be subsiding in the
next few months, the Board must revise its Rules of Procedure
to continue receiving citizen comments through the digital
meeting portal. He stated the revisions do not change the
timelines and requirements for citizens wishing to provide
comments in person.
Mr. Holland stated the revisions enhance communications and
the sharing of information with the Board prior to the meeting.
Ms. Haley referenced Section 9b of the Rules of Procedure which
state a person who represents an organization may speak once
at a public hearing for up to five minutes but only if i) three
or more members of the organization are present at the public
21-364
6/23/2021
hearing, and ii) no member of the organization speaks at the
public hearing other than the representative. She stated she
received a concern inquiring about what would happen if
everyone from the organization wanted to speak. She clarified
if everyone from the organization wanted to speak, each person
would get three minutes. She stated if there is a collective
message from an organization, one person would get five minutes
to present the collective message on behalf of the group.
Mr. Mincks concurred with Ms. Haley's explanation.
Dr. Casey clarified that the process for a representative
speaking on behalf of an organization was already in the
existing Rules of Procedure.
Mr. Mincks stated there is no limitation on the number of
comments that may be received through the digital meeting
portal and it can always be used in an unlimited way.
Mr. Carroll stated the digital meeting portal was very helpful
during the pandemic, and he believes it is important to
continue it. He further stated Section 9b of the Rules of
Procedure referenced by Ms. Haley was added by this current
Board at the beginning of its term in 2020.
13. FIFTEEN -MINUTE CITIZEN COMMENT PERIOD ON UNSCHEDULED
MATTERS
Ms. Doris Knick addressed the Board relative to medical
apartheid, mask mandates, and vaccine mandates.
Ms. Brenda Stewart addressed the Board relative to her
experience with the Board of Equalization and her appeal of
the assessment of her family farm.
Mr. Mike Uzel addressed the Board relative to the
qualifications of the Real Estate Assessor. He expressed his
concerns about citizens not being allowed to speak on items
pulled from the Consent Agenda.
At Mr. Holland's request, Mr. Minks reiterated his explanation
of why some items allow for citizen comments while others do
not. He stated the vast majority of items on the agenda are
for Board decision without public comment or public hearing.
With regard to the Southside Speedway item, he stated the Board
has been very clear about committing to public involvement and
public comment.
21-365
6/23/2021
On motion of Mr.
Carroll, seconded by Mr.
Winslow, the
Board
adopted amendments
to the 2021 Rules of Procedure
of the
Board
of Supervisors,
as submitted, to provide
for the receipt of
citizen comments via the Board's digital
meeting portal.
(It
is noted a copy
of the amended Rules of
Procedure are
filed
with the papers
of this Board.)
Ayes: Holland,
Winslow, Ingle, Carroll and
Haley.
Nays: None.
13. FIFTEEN -MINUTE CITIZEN COMMENT PERIOD ON UNSCHEDULED
MATTERS
Ms. Doris Knick addressed the Board relative to medical
apartheid, mask mandates, and vaccine mandates.
Ms. Brenda Stewart addressed the Board relative to her
experience with the Board of Equalization and her appeal of
the assessment of her family farm.
Mr. Mike Uzel addressed the Board relative to the
qualifications of the Real Estate Assessor. He expressed his
concerns about citizens not being allowed to speak on items
pulled from the Consent Agenda.
At Mr. Holland's request, Mr. Minks reiterated his explanation
of why some items allow for citizen comments while others do
not. He stated the vast majority of items on the agenda are
for Board decision without public comment or public hearing.
With regard to the Southside Speedway item, he stated the Board
has been very clear about committing to public involvement and
public comment.
21-365
6/23/2021
Mr. Carl Schwendeman addressed the Board relative to funding
for the repair of medians and sidewalks along Route 60 and the
Southport district.
Ms. Haley encouraged Mr. Schwendeman to email her so she could
provide him with information on the anticipated work.
14. DEFERRED ITEMS
21-366
6/23/2021
14.A. TO CONSIDER THE ISSUANCE BY THE HARRISONBURG
REDEVELOPMENT AND HOUSING AUTHORITY OF UP TO
$19,000,000 OF ITS MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL
RENTAL AFFORDABLE HOUSING FACILITY REVENUE BONDS
TO FINANCE THE ACQUISITION, CONSTRUCTION, AND
EQUIPPING OF THE DEVELOPMENT (BELLWOOD CROSSING)
Mr. Dan Cohen, Director of Community Enhancement, stated this
date and time has been advertised for a public hearing for the
Board to consider the issuance by the Harrisonburg
Redevelopment and Housing Authority of up to $19,000,000 of
its multifamily residential rental affordable housing facility
revenue bonds to finance the acquisition, construction, and
equipment of the Bellwood Crossing development at 8075
Jefferson Davis Highway. He provided details of the resolution
which must be adopted by the Board in accordance with the
Virginia Code.
Mr. Holland called for public comment.
Mr. Charlie Heritage, Managing Partner of South Creek
Development and one of the owners of Bellwood Crossing, LLC,
provided the Board with a rendering of the proposed
development. He provided details of military and trade
positions that would qualify to live in the new residences. He
stated replacing the junkyard with high quality housing at
rents below market would create over $375,000 per year in
disposable income within the corridor which would attract
additional investment in the corridor. He discussed requests
made by the Jefferson Davis Association (SDA) to add 10 one -
bedroom residences, decrease three-bedroom residences, and
work with Planning to allow additional improvements within the
open space. He stated in response to JDA's requests, they added
18 one -bedroom residences and reduced the number of three-
bedroom residences; they expressed willingness to work with
Planning staff to add amenities to the open space area to the
extent permitted by Planning; they added 10 market rate
residences with no income restrictions, with the remainder of
residences at 60 percent area median income (AMI); they added
an initiative for veterans and their family members for 50
percent of the residences; and they will lease up to 10
residences to the Chesterfield County Community Services Board
(CSB). He encouraged the Board to adopt the resolution
supporting the provision of high-quality housing at lower rents
to create disposable income.
Ms. Renae Eldred with the JDA expressed concerns relative to
the amount of affordable housing the county has in one area.
She stated the goal is to revitalize and bring the area up.
She further stated the JDA is not against affordable housing
21-366
6/23/2021
but is against the concentration of people without disposable
income.
Mr. Phil Cunningham with the JDA expressed concerns relative
to the saturation of affordable housing in the Jefferson Davis
corridor and Bermuda District. He stated the JDA board was
opposed to the type funding for this project. He encouraged
the Board to deny the applicant's request.
Ms. Virginia Santos with the Better Housing Coalition and a
resident of the Bermuda District expressed support for the
project.
Ms. Kim Marble with the Route One Association for
Revitalization (ROAR) stated this process has illuminated
concerns with the overlay ordinance such as the elimination of
public input until the very end. She expressed concerns with
the funding source for the project and the overlay.
Mr. Jeff Geiger, representing the applicant, stated the
opposition focused on affordability, incomes, and
concentration of poverty, and Virginia law does not allow for
consideration of those items in terms of these votes. He
further stated the Board would be voting on a resolution
stating safe housing is needed. He stated the project provides
not only safe but high-quality housing at rents below market
rate to create disposable income in the corridor. with regard
to the question of funding, he affirmed the funding would be
in place for 30 years. He discussed efforts to work with the
SDA. He asked the Board to approve the resolution.
There being no one else to speak to the issue, the public
hearing was closed.
On motion of Mr. Ingle, seconded by Mr. Carroll, the Board
denied the request to adopt a resolution affirming the issuance
by the Harrisonburg Redevelopment and Housing Authority of up
to $19,000,000 of its Multifamily Residential Rental
Affordable Housing Facility Revenue Bonds to Finance the
Acquisition, Construction, and Equipping of the Development
(Bellwood Crossing).
Mr.
Ingle:
Aye
Mr.
Carroll:
Aye
Ms.
Haley:
Aye
Mr.
Winslow:
Aye
Mr.
Holland:
Aye
Mr. Holland stated he wants to see improvements in the overlay
process. He expressed his hope that this is not a continuing
situation in the county and that there would be input at the
beginning, not the end, of the process.
21-367
6/23/2021
15.
FOLLOWING ORDER: - WITHDRAWALS/DEFERRA',
WHERE THE APPLICANT ACCEPTS THE RECOMM
THERE IS NO OPPOSITION - CASES WHERE T'.
NOT ACCEPT THE RECOMMENDATION AND/OR T'.
OPPOSITION WILL BE HEARD AT SECTION 18
Ms. Sara Hall stated for each case on the consent agenda, staff
received written confirmation from the applicant that they are
in agreement with the conditions or proffers contained within
the staff report, and they confirmed the conditions or proffers
are reasonable under state law.
gnemntiF
In Dale Magisterial District, the Chesterfield County Board of
supervisors requests conditional use to permit a private school
and conditional use planned development to permit exceptions
to ordinance requirements and development standards and
amendment to zoning district map in a Residential (R-7)
District on 34.61 acres known as 6511 Belmont Road. Density
will be controlled by zoning conditions or ordinance standards.
The Comprehensive Plan suggests the property is appropriate
Suburban Residential II use (2 to 4 dwellings per acre). Tax
ID 768-688-2968.
Ms. Hall presented a summary of Case 20SN0516. She stated staff
received no comments on the case, and the Planning Commission
and staff recommended approval subject to the conditions in
the staff report. \
Mr. Holland called for public comment. `+
Ms. Vickie Stitzer, the Chair of the Board of Directors of
Richmond Christian School, expressed appreciation to the Board
for consideration of the case.
There being no one else to speak to the issue, the public
hearing was closed.
On motion of Mr. Holland, seconded by Ms. Haley, the Board
approved Case 20SN0516 and accepted the following proffered
condition:
1. The Textual Statement dated May 10, 2021 shall serve as
the master plan for the site. (P)
Ayes: Holland, Winslow, Ingle, Carroll and Haley.
Nays: None.
21SN0546
In Midlothian Magisterial
District, Westchester Towns
Development Company, LLC requests
amendment of
zoning approval
(Case 06SN0191) to permit
residential townhouse
use and
amendment of zoning district
map in a General
Industrial (I-
2) District on 13.5 acres
fronting in two
(2) places for
approximately 900 feet along
the west line of
Watkins Centre
21-368
6/23/2021
Parkway, 1,150 feet north of Midlothian Turnpike. Density will
be controlled by zoning conditions or ordinance standards. The
Comprehensive Plan suggests the property is appropriate for
Regional Mixed Use. Tax IDs 716-712-0421; 716-713-4302 and
5621; and 717-712 Part of 1910.
Mr. Holland called for public comment
Mr. Carl Schwendeman requested the owner of the Watkins Centre
to build a bike path or sidewalk from the intersection of
Watkins Centre Parkway to James View Drive.
There being no one else to speak to the issue, the public
hearing was closed.
On motion of Ms. Haley, seconded by Mr. Ingle, the Board
approved Case 21SN0546 and accepted to the following proffered
conditions:
The property owner and applicant in this rezoning case
("Applicant"), pursuant to Section 15.2-2298 of the Code of
Virginia (1950, as amended) and the Zoning Ordinance of
Chesterfield County, for themselves and their successors or
assigns, proffer that the property under consideration (the
(+' "Property") will be developed according to the following
proffers if, and only if, the rezoning request submitted
herewith is granted with only those conditions agreed to by
the Applicant. In the event this request is denied or approved
with conditions not agreed to by the Applicant, the proffers
shall immediately be null and void and of no further force or
effect.
Ms. Hall presented a
summary of Case 21SN0546. She stated staff
shall be considered the Master Plan. (P)
received no comments
on the case,
and the Planning
Commission
recommended approval
subject to
the conditions in
the staff
the final subdivision plan depending on the final soil
report.
studies, RPA lines, wetlands, road design, lot locations,
planting locations and types, amenity locations,
Mr. Gillies stated the
applicant
submitted written
acceptance
Conceptual Layout shall be approved by the Planning
of the conditions.
Commission at the time of plans review. (P)
3. Architecture. (P)
Mr. Holland called for public comment
Mr. Carl Schwendeman requested the owner of the Watkins Centre
to build a bike path or sidewalk from the intersection of
Watkins Centre Parkway to James View Drive.
There being no one else to speak to the issue, the public
hearing was closed.
On motion of Ms. Haley, seconded by Mr. Ingle, the Board
approved Case 21SN0546 and accepted to the following proffered
conditions:
The property owner and applicant in this rezoning case
("Applicant"), pursuant to Section 15.2-2298 of the Code of
Virginia (1950, as amended) and the Zoning Ordinance of
Chesterfield County, for themselves and their successors or
assigns, proffer that the property under consideration (the
(+' "Property") will be developed according to the following
proffers if, and only if, the rezoning request submitted
herewith is granted with only those conditions agreed to by
the Applicant. In the event this request is denied or approved
with conditions not agreed to by the Applicant, the proffers
shall immediately be null and void and of no further force or
effect.
appearance shown on the illustrative architectural
21-369
6/23/2021
1. Master Plan. The Textual Statement dated May 6, 2021
shall be considered the Master Plan. (P)
2. Conceptual Layout. The site shall be developed in general
conformance with the conceptual layout depicted on
Exhibit A attached hereto ("Conceptual Layout"). The
Conceptual Layout is conceptual in nature and may vary in
the final subdivision plan depending on the final soil
studies, RPA lines, wetlands, road design, lot locations,
planting locations and types, amenity locations,
pedestrian connection locations, and other engineering or
design reasons. Any other substantial change to the
Conceptual Layout shall be approved by the Planning
`
Commission at the time of plans review. (P)
3. Architecture. (P)
a. Development of townhome buildings shall be in
general conformance with the architectural
appearance shown on the illustrative architectural
21-369
6/23/2021
elevations shown on Exhibit B, or another
architectural appearance approved by the Planning
Commission at the time of plans review and approval
or subsequent thereto upon request by the owner of
the Property. The illustrative elevations are
conceptual in nature and may vary at the time of
plans review. For example, the location of
materials, types of material, use of stoops, and
architectural detailing may change from building to
building.
b. The rooftop decks shown shall only be incorporated
into the townhome units in accordance with the
following sentence. Rooftop decks, as generally
illustrated on Exhibit B, shall be required on a
minimum of fifty (50%) percent of the townhome units
located on the eastern side of the eastern roundabout
shown on the Conceptual Layout and on a minimum of
twenty-five (25%) percent of the townhome units in
the remainder of the project.
c. Sixteen foot (16') wide units shall only be
incorporated into a townhome building in the
following manner: (i) no more than two (2) sixteen
foot (16') wide units in a four (4) unit building or
less; (ii) no more than two (2) sixteen foot (16')
wide units in a five (5) unit building; and (iii) no
more than three (3) sixteen foot (16') wide units in
a building with six or more units in the townhome
building, unless otherwise approved at the time of
plans review.
d. "Major Architectural Feature" shall mean any one of
the following: color palette, masonry material,
design of siding (e.g. lap, shake, panels of
different design), location of masonry material,
whether a rooftop deck is used on a unit, front entry
or side entry for a unit, whether a box or bay window
is used on a unit, and the location of a box or bay
window on a unit.
e. Units of the same width that are adjacent to each
other in the same building shall have Different Unit
Elevations. "Different Unit Elevations" means that
when comparing the two unit elevations at least one
Major Architectural Feature shall be different.
f. Buildings that have adjacent side elevations or
buildings that have front elevations facing each
other across a street shall have Different Building
Elevations. "Different Building Elevations" means
that when comparing the two building elevations at
least three Major Architectural Features shall be
different.
g. Differences in building or unit elevations shall not
be determined based on muttons, mullions, trim and
other architectural details that are not a Major
Architectural Feature.
21-370
6/23/2021
4. Materials. Acceptable siding materials include brick,
brick veneer, stone, stone veneer, cultured stone, tilt -
up panels, tile, fiber cement siding (such as HardiPlank,
HardieShingle, and HardieTrim), or other masonry
materials, or engineered wood siding (such as LP
SmartSide). Dutch lap, plywood, and metal siding are not
permitted. Other materials may be used for parapets,
cornices, surrounds, trim, architectural decorations, and
other design or architectural elements. No vinyl siding
/' shall be permitted. Roofing material for sloped roofs
l`r shall be standing seam metal, dimensional architectural
shingles, or better with a minimum of 30 -year warranty.
(P)
Front Elevations. On each townhome building, the exterior
portions of the front building wall surface, excluding
windows, doors, breezeways, gables, box bays and other
architectural design features, shall be constructed with
a minimum of fifty percent (50%), in the aggregate,
masonry material, such as brick, brick veneer, stone,
cultured stone, stone veneer, or another masonry
material. (P)
6. High Visibility Side Elevations. The Conceptual Layout
identifies certain lots that are required to have a high
visibility side elevation. A high visibility side
elevation shall employ design features to embellish the
side facade. The design features employed shall include:
(i) a minimum of fifty percent (50%) of the exterior
portion of the side elevation building wall surface,
excluding windows, doors, breezeways, gables and other
architectural design features and (ii) at least one of
the following design elements: gables, dormers, shutters,
other architectural features or the use of enhanced
landscaping to reinforce the streetscape and minimize the
view of the side of the units with shade trees, fences,
garden walls, hedges, shrubs, etc., to help define the
side yard and street edge. (P)
Utilities. Public water and wastewater systems shall be
used. (U)
Wastewater Capacity. The owner of the Property shall
perform a hydraulic analysis of the County's adjacent
wastewater pipes to verify adequate capacity exists prior
to site plan approval. Any capacity related improvements
required to support the demands of this project shall be
reflected on the site plan and will be the responsibility
of the owner of the Property. (U)
9. Street Trees. Street trees shall be planted along the
roads as generally shown on the Conceptual Layout with a
maximum average spacing of forty (40) feet on center. In
the event of conflicts with utilities, easements,
sightlines, entrances and other conflicts, the required
spacing shall be increased. (P)
10. Exterior Lighting. Pedestrian scale light fixtures not
exceeding twenty feet (20') in height shall be located in
the locations generally shown on the Conceptual Layout.
21-371
6/23/2021
Each townhome lot shall have a hard -wired, front yard post
lamp employing a photoelectric cell, instead of a switch.
(P)
11. Pocket Parks. The pocket parks shown on the Conceptual
Layout shall be improved with landscaping, walkways, and
benches, in general conformance with hardscape
improvements design illustrated on the Conceptual Layout,
which designs are conceptual in nature and the actual
hardscape improvements may vary in detail, unless another
hardscape improvement design is approved at the time of
plans review and approval. The landscaping for the pocket
parks shall be submitted with the landscape plan at the
time of plans review. The landscaping for the pocket parks
shall at a minimum create grass areas with trees with at
least two perimeter planting beds with shrubs and the
hardscape improvements generally shown on the Conceptual
Layout, but at least two of the pocket parks shall be
designed with perimeter shrubbery to enclose the pocket
park. The paseos shown on the Conceptual Layout shall be
improved with landscaping and walkways, in general
conformance with the design illustrated as the Conceptual
Layout, which are conceptual in nature and the actual
improvements may vary in detail, unless another
improvement design is approved at the time of plans review
and approval. In addition, the owner of the Property may
add landscaping to shorten views of commercial areas as
shown on the landscape plan to be submitted at the time
of plans review. (P)
12. Ouen Snace Between Townhomes and Main Street Commercial
The common area located between the commercial j
development fronting on Main Street and the townhome lots J
located immediately to the west of the commercial
development fronting on Main Street shall be planted using
the plant types and plant spacing identified in Perimeter
Landscape B. The plant spacing and plant types may be
adjusted to accommodate utility installations and other
improvements as shown on the submitted landscape plan at
the time of plans review. (P)
13. Optional Fencing. In the event fencing is used in common
areas to define the transition from neighboring
commercial uses to the residential uses in the project,
this fence shall be black, decorative and transparent in
design, such as a fence made of low maintenance material
designed to look like a wrought iron fence. (P)
14. Gold's Gym Sidewalk. If the owner of the parcel of land
identified as GPIN 717-712-1910 provides land at no cost
to the owner of the Property, then the owner of the
Property shall construct an approximately three foot (31)
wide to four foot (4') wide sidewalk along the west side
of WC Commons Drive between WC Main Street and the
southern property line of the portion of the project that
is bounded on the north and east sides by WC Commons
Drive. This sidewalk shall be constructed against the
curb with no required utility strip located between the
curb and the sidewalk. This sidewalk shall be constructed
over or around existing improvements with no obligation
21-372
6/23/2021
to relocate any utilities or other improvements. In the
event the sidewalk cannot be constructed over or around
existing improvements without relocation, the County or
a third party shall either pay the relocation cost or the
owner's obligation under this proffer shall be null and
void. In the event a handrail is required along any
portion of the sidewalk, the sidewalk design required by
this proffer shall be modified to remove the requirement
for the handrail. If the sidewalk design cannot be
physically or legally modified, then the owner's
obligation under this proffer shall be null and void.
15. Screening of HVAC Units. HVAC units located on the roof
shall be screened from view from the adjacent public right
of way. HVAC units located on the ground shall be
screened from view by landscaping or low maintenance
material, but if the HVAC unit is located in the rear yard
between driveways then this required screening shall be
provided only on the side of the unit facing the alley.
(P)
Ayes: Holland, Winslow, Ingle, Carroll and Haley.
Nays: None.
21SN0589
In Bermuda Magisterial District, Casey Paminiano requests
rezoning from Residential (R-7) to Corporate Office (0-2) and
amendment of zoning district map on 0.52 acre known as 3815
Hundred Road. Density will be controlled by zoning conditions
or ordinance standards. The Comprehensive Plan suggests the
property is appropriate for Office/Residential Mixed Use. Tax
IDs 791-655-2183 and 2789.
Ms. Hall presented a summary of Case 21SN0589. She stated staff
received no comments on the case, and the Planning Commission
recommended approval subject to the conditions in the staff
report.
Mr. Holland called for public comment
There being no one to speak to the issue, the public hearing
was closed.
On motion of Mr. Ingle, seconded by Ms. Haley, the Board
approved Case 21SN0589 and accepted the following proffered
condition:
1) Prior to commencing the operation of a business on the
subject property, required site plan, and building permits
for site required improvements will be obtained. (P)
Ayes: Holland, Winslow, Ingle, Carroll and Haley.
Nays: None.
21-373
6/23/2021
21SNO603
In Midlothian Magisterial District, Sean Woehrle requests
amendment of zoning approval (Case 05SN0249) to modify
development standards, relative to tree preservation strip and
setback, and amendment of zoning district map in a Residential
(R-15) District on 0.68 acre known as 3625 Stone Harbor Drive.
Density will be controlled by zoning conditions or ordinance
standards. The Comprehensive Plan suggests the property is
appropriate for Low Density Residential use (Maximum of 1
dwelling per acre). Tax ID 726-726-2575.
Ms. Hall presented a summary of Case 21SNO603. She stated staff
received no comments on the case, and the Planning Commission
recommended approval subject to the conditions in the staff
report.
Mr. Holland called for public comment.
There being no one to speak to the issue, the public hearing
was closed.
On motion of Ms. Haley, seconded by Mr. Ingle, the Board
approved Case 21SNO603 and accepted the following proffered
conditions:
1. Use and Location. The proposed pool and patio, as depicted
in Exhibit A, and any drainage improvements designed to
enhance the on-site drainage shall be permitted to be
constructed within the tree preservation strip and
setback. These improvements shall be no closer than 18
feet from the rear property line and no additional
improvements shall be permitted within the tree
preservation area. (P)
2. Landscaping Screening. With the exception of the pool and
patio encroachment as depicted in Exhibit A, the area
within the recorded tree preservation strip shall be
planted in accordance with Condition 14 of Case OSSNO249.
Landscaping shall be provided and maintained as generally
depicted in Exhibit A. (this will include the additional
plantings as noted on the plan.) A landscape plan
providing exact species and number of trees and/or shrubs,
as well as a planting schedule shall be approved by the
Planning Department prior to issuance of a building
permit. (P)
Ayes: Holland, Winslow, Ingle, Carroll and Haley.
Nays: None.
21SNO607
In Clover Hill Magisterial District, Village of Faith J
Ministries requests conditional use for a tattoo parlor and•••••///
amendment of zoning district map in a Community Business (C-
3) District on 1.52 acres known as 10902 Hull Street Road.
Density will be controlled by zoning conditions or ordinance
standards. The Comprehensive Plan suggests the property is
21-374
6/23/2021
appropriate for Community Business use. Tax ID 744-685-2207-
00002.
Ms. Hall presented a summary of Case 21SN0607. She stated staff
received no comments on the case, and the Planning Commission
recommended approval subject to the conditions in the staff
report.
Mr. Holland called for public comment.
(, Mr. Ian Hopkins, the applicant, stated he has been tattooing
for almost ten years and he wants to bring more tattoo business
to the county.
There being no one else to speak to the issue, the public
hearing was closed.
On motion of Mr. Winslow, seconded by Mr. Carroll, the Board
approved Case 21SN0607 subject to the following conditions:
1. Hours of Operation: hours of operation shall be limited
to 7:OOam until 11:OOpm. (P)
2. Use: This conditional use shall be for the operation of a
tattoo shop. (P)
3. Non -Transferable Ownership: This conditional use approval
shall be granted to and for Ian Hopkins, exclusively, and
shall not be transferable nor run with the land. (P)
Ayes: Holland, Winslow, Ingle, Carroll and Haley.
( Nays: None.
21SN0619
In Matoaca Magisterial District, Clover Hill Assembly of God
requests conditional use to permit a private school and child
day care on 8.96 acres with conditional use planned development
to permit exceptions to development standards on 12.96 acres
and amendment of zoning district map in an Agricultural (A)
District known as 12310 Bailey Bridge Road. Density will be
controlled by zoning conditions or ordinance standards. The
Comprehensive Plan suggests the property is appropriate for
Suburban Residential II use (2 to 4 dwellings per acre). Tax
ID 738-674-1979.
Ms. Hall presented a summary of Case 21SN0619. She stated staff
received no comments on the case, and the Planning Commission
recommended approval subject to the conditions in the staff
report.
Mr. Holland called for public comment.
Mr. Dave Anderson, representing the applicant, expressed
appreciation to Mr. Ryan Ramsey, Case Manager, and Mr. Joe
Feest, Planning Manager, for providing excellent customer
service.
21-375
6/23/2021
There being no one else to speak to the issue, the public
hearing was closed.
On motion of Mr. Carroll, seconded by Mr. Ingle, the Board
approved Case 21SN0619 and accepted the following proffered
conditions:
1. Textual Statement. The Textual Statement, dated June 9,
2021, shall be considered the Master Plan. (P)
2. Private School and Child Day Care Uses. Any private school
or child day care use operated on-site in conjunction with
the church use, shall be subject to the conditions of Case
06SN0209. (P)
Staff Note: This condition expands the private school
and child day care uses from a portion of the Property
(4.0 acres) to the entire Property (12.96 Acres).)
Ayes: Holland, Winslow, Ingle, Carroll and Haley.
Nays: None.
20SN0567
In Clover Hill Magisterial District, Lake Adventures, LLC
(project commonly known as The Lake) requests amendment of
zoning approval (Case 16SN0704) relative to cash proffers,
master plan, utilities, transportation improvements, density,
uses, building heights, and phasing plus a conditional use to
permit sales of alcoholic beverages for onsite consumption
within 500 feet of certain schools and amendment of zoning
district map in a Regional Business (C-4) District on 104.58
acres located in the northeast and northwest quadrants of
Genito Road and Genito Place at Route 288. Density will be
controlled by zoning conditions or ordinance standards. The
Comprehensive Plan suggests the property is appropriate for
Regional Mixed Use. Tax IDs 731-689-5633; 731-690-4397; 732-
688-0178; and 732-689-5376.
Mr. Ray Cash presented a summary of Case 20SN0567. He reviewed
the case history and provided details of the proposed changes
to previous cases 16SN0704 and 18SN0833. He stated the Planning
Commission and Planning staff recommended approval subject to
the conditions in the staff report.
Mr. Jack Wilson, representing the applicant, stated the
applicant desires to make the project even more exciting and
bring it up to reflect current market conditions. He further
stated with The Lake being in close proximity to the Southside
Speedway property, the opportunities for synergy in the
corridor are outstanding. He discussed the need for a
conditional use permit to allow for the onsite consumption of
alcohol which was overlooked in the previous case. He stated
the applicant is bringing the project into compliance with the
road cash proffer policy. He provided details of the addition
of the surf pool and stated he believes it will be the largest
in the United States. He discussed the addition of mixed-use
buildings and stated the applicant has ensured the balance
between residential phasing and commercial phasing is
21-376
6/23/2021
maintained. He reviewed the structured parking which
eliminates large parking lots around buildings and provides
for further commercial development around the mixed-use
buildings.
In response to Mr. Ingle's question relative to alcohol sales
within 500 feet of the school, Mr. Wilson displayed the Aerial
and Land Use Plan Map and showed the barriers between the
project and the school.
fir, Mr. Ingle stated he wanted to clarify the location of the
alcohol sales in relation to the school.
Mr. Wilson stated school representatives were invited to the
community meeting to see if there were any issues, and none
were raised.
Mr. Carroll made the distinction that the alcohol sales may be
within 500 feet of the property line, but they are farther away
from the school building.
Mr. Wilson concurred. He stated the ordinance requirement
measures property line to property line as opposed to the
actual proximity to the school facility itself. He further
stated the alcohol sales are much farther away than that.
Mr. Holland called for public comment
Mr. Carl Schwendeman requested the developer to build the
missing section of sidewalk on Charter Colony Road, thereby
There being no one else to speak to the issue, the public
hearing was closed.
Mr. Winslow discussed the history of the case. He expressed
his commitment to obtain exit ramps from Route 288 to Genito
Road. He discussed concerns relative to noise and stated he
believes the orientation of the amphitheater toward Route 288
and the decibel limit have addressed those concerns. He
highlighted the amount of tax base that will be present in this
case which will benefit schools and public safety. He expressed
his hope that The Lake, River City Sportsplex, and future plans
for the Southside Speedway property will reinvigorate the area.
He then made a motion, seconded by Ms. Haley, to approve Case
20SN0567 subject to the following condition:
Alcohol Beverage Consumption Near Public Schools. with the
approval of this conditional use, commercial establishments
seeking to have alcoholic beverage sales for on -premise
consumption are no longer subject to the 500 linear feet
distance limitation from Clover Hill High School, as outlined
in Section 19.1-52.D.2 of the Zoning Ordinance.
(P)
21-377
6/23/2021
connecting to the
Brandermill sidewalk
system and
trails.
Mr. John Hughes,
representing the
Brandermill
Board of
Directors, stated
Brandermill supports
the case.
He further
stated efforts to
address traffic concerns will
make sports
tourism successful
in the Clover Hill
District.
He discussed
the need to connect
Route 288 to Genito
Road.
There being no one else to speak to the issue, the public
hearing was closed.
Mr. Winslow discussed the history of the case. He expressed
his commitment to obtain exit ramps from Route 288 to Genito
Road. He discussed concerns relative to noise and stated he
believes the orientation of the amphitheater toward Route 288
and the decibel limit have addressed those concerns. He
highlighted the amount of tax base that will be present in this
case which will benefit schools and public safety. He expressed
his hope that The Lake, River City Sportsplex, and future plans
for the Southside Speedway property will reinvigorate the area.
He then made a motion, seconded by Ms. Haley, to approve Case
20SN0567 subject to the following condition:
Alcohol Beverage Consumption Near Public Schools. with the
approval of this conditional use, commercial establishments
seeking to have alcoholic beverage sales for on -premise
consumption are no longer subject to the 500 linear feet
distance limitation from Clover Hill High School, as outlined
in Section 19.1-52.D.2 of the Zoning Ordinance.
(P)
21-377
6/23/2021
And, further, the Board accepted the following proffered
conditions:
The property owner and applicant in this case, pursuant to
Section 15.2-2298 of the Code of Virginia (1950 as amended)
and the Zoning Ordinance of Chesterfield County, for themselves
and their successors and assigns, proffer that the property
under consideration ("the Property") will be developed
according to the following proffers if, and only if, the
request submitted herewith is granted with only those
conditions agreed to by the owner and applicant. In the event
this request is denied or approved with conditions not agreed
to by the owner and applicant, the proffers shall immediately
be null and void and of no further force or effect.
With the approval of this request, Proffers 3, 8 and 10 of Case
16SN0704 shall be deleted.
With the approval of this request, Proffer 1 of Case 16SN0704
shall be amended to read as follows:
1. Master Plan. The Plan titled "Waterford Water Park Zoning
Uses" prepared by Rummet, Klepper & Kahl, LLP, dated March
3, 2016, and the Textual Statement last revised May 18,
2021, shall be considered the Master Plan. (P)
With the approval of this request, Proffer 2 of Case 16SN0704
shall be amended to read as follows:
2. Utilities. Public water and wastewater service will be
used for domestic purposes throughout the development.
Non -potable water wells may be used for outside
recreational and irrigation purposes only. The developer
shall perform a hydraulic analysis of the County's
wastewater system to verify adequate capacity exists prior
to any future site plan approval. Any capacity related
improvements required to support the demands of this
development shall be reflected on the site plan and the
responsibility of the developer. (U)
With the approval of this request, Proffer 4 of Case 16SN0704
shall be amended to read as follows:
3. Residential Phasing.
A. Multifamily on Tract A. The multifamily phasing on
Tract A shall be governed by Section II.F. of the
Textual Statement.
S. Until such time as Phase I of the Water Park and the
20,000 square feet of gross floor area of Commercial
Space, as described in the Textual Statement, II.
F., are Completed, building permits shall not be
released for any townhouse dwelling units. Once Jj
Phase I and the described Commercial Space are
Completed, building permits may be released for a
maximum cumulative total of 190 townhouse dwelling
units ("Initial Townhouse Units").
21-378
6/23/2021
C. After a cumulative total of 150,000 square feet of
gross floor area of Commercial Space is Completed,
building permits for an additional 150 townhouse
dwelling units ("Additional Townhouse Units") may be
issued.
D. After a cumulative total of 250,000 square feet of
gross floor area of Commercial Space has been
Committed and Commenced, building permits for the
remaining townhouse units permitted on the Property
may be released.
E. For purposes of calculating the square feet of
Commercial Space set forth in Proffered Conditions
3.0 and 3.D:
1. A hotel shall count as 2 times the actual gross
floor area of the hotel; and
2. Provided that all components of the main water
feature as outlined in Proffered Condition 7
are Completed, the components shall count
41,400 gross square feet toward meeting the
minimum square footage of Commercial Space set
forth in Proffered Conditions 3.B. and 3.C; and
3. Any commercial space in excess of 20,000 square
feet in a Mixed Use Building shall count toward
meeting the minimum square footage of
Commercial Space set forth in Proffered
Conditions 3.0 and 3.D.
F. In conjunction with submission of a building permit
for residential units, documentation shall be
submitted as to the amount of Commercial Space
Completed and/or Committed and Commenced, as
required by this proffer.
Property shall be 143,000 square feet of retail, 225,000
square feet of business park, 830 apartments, 360
21-379
6/23/2021
G. Mixed Use Buildings on Tract E. The mixed use
buildings provided for in Section VII.B. of the
Textual Statement are not subject to any phasing
requirements so long as any such mixed use building
contains a minimum of 20,000 square feet of
Commercial Space on the ground floor of such mixed
use building and are designed and constructed with
structured parking (as defined in section VII.B.l.e
of the Textual Statement). Notwithstanding the
foregoing, building permits shall not be issued for
the first Mixed Use Building until the Operation and
Maintenance Certificate for Virginia Regulated
Impounding Structures set forth in 4VAC 50-20 has
been issued by to the Virginia Department of
Conservation and Recreation for the Main Lake set
forth in Textual Statement 11.F.1.a. (B&M, P)
With the approval of this request, Proffer 5 of Case 16SN0704
shall be amended to read as follows:
4. Transportation Densities. The maximum density on the
Property shall be 143,000 square feet of retail, 225,000
square feet of business park, 830 apartments, 360
21-379
6/23/2021
townhomes, 50,000 square feet of restaurants, 40 -acre
"Outdoor Adventure Park", and 170 hotel rooms, or
equivalent densities as approved by the Transportation
Department. (T)
With the approval of this request, Proffer 7 of Case 16SN0704
shall be amended to read as follows:
S. Road Improvements. The owner/developer shall be
responsible for the following road improvements. The exact
design and length of these road improvements shall be
approved by the Transportation Department:
A. The following on-site road improvements shall be
constructed by the owner/developer.
1. Construction of additional pavement along the
westbound lanes of Genito Road to provide a
separate right turn lane at the Easternmost
Access.
2. Construction of additional pavement along the
westbound lanes of Genito Road to provide a
separate right turn lane at the Westernmost
Access.
3. Construction of additional pavement along
Genito Road to provide dual left turn lanes at
the crossover that will serve the Main Access.
4. Construction of additional pavement along the
Main Access to provide a five (5) lane typical j
section (i.e., three (3) southbound lanes and J
two (2) northbound lanes) at its intersection
with Genito Road.
B. The following off-site road improvements shall be
constructed by the owner/developer.
1. Construction of two (2) lanes of Genito Place
from the proposed five (5) -lane section to
Tredegar Lake Parkway (approximately 1,900
feet).
2. Full cost of intersection control (traffic
signal or alternative) at the Main
Access/Genito Road/Kelly Green Drive
intersection, if warranted, as determined by
the Transportation Department.
3. Construction of a two (2) lanes of Tredegar Lake
Parkway from Genito Place to existing terminus
of Tredegar Lake Parkway (approximately 650
feet).
4. Construction of additional pavement along the
westbound lanes of Genito Road at the Charter
Colony Parkway/Old Hundred Road/Genito Road
intersection to provide dual right turn lanes
21-380
6/23/2021
from westbound Genito Road to northbound
Charter Colony Parkway.
S. Full cost of traffic signal modification at the
Charter Colony Parkway/Old Hundred Road/Genito
Road intersection, if warranted, as determined
by the Transportation Department.
6. Construction of additional pavement along the
southbound lanes of Charter Colony Parkway to
provide dual left turn lanes at the Charter
Colony Parkway/Tredegar Lake Parkway/Colony
Crossing Place intersection.
7. Construction of additional pavement along the
westbound lanes of Tredegar Lake Parkway to
provide a three (3) lane typical section (i.e.,
a right turn lane, a thru/left lane and a
separate left turn lane) at its intersection
with Charter Colony Parkway.
8. Full cost of traffic signal modification at the
Tredegar Lake Parkway/Colony Crossing
Place/Charter Colony Parkway intersection, if
warranted, as determined by the Transportation
Department.
D. The phasing of these improvements shall be as
outlined herein unless otherwise requested by the
Developer and approved by the Transportation
Department.
1. Prior to recordation of or issuance of
certificates of occupancy of a cumulative total
of more than 344 dwelling units, 40 -acre
Adventure Park, and 50,000 square feet of retail
(or equivalent densities as approved by the
Transportation Department), the Developer shall
construct the improvements specified in
proffered conditions S.B.1, 5.3.2 (when
warranted), and 5.B.3.
21-381
6/23/2021
C. Dedication to Chesterfield County, free and
unrestricted, of any additional right-of-way (or
easements) required for the improvements identified
above. In the event the developer is unable to
acquire the "off-site" right-of-way that is
necessary for the road improvements described above,
the developer may request, in writing, that the
county acquire such right-of-way as a public road
improvement. All costs associated with the
acquisition of the right-of-way shall be borne by
the developer. In the event the county chooses not
to assist the developer in acquisition of the "off-
site" right-of-way, the developer shall be relieved
of the obligation to acquire the "off-site" right-
of-way and shall provide the road improvements within
available right-of-way, as determined by the
Transportation Department.
D. The phasing of these improvements shall be as
outlined herein unless otherwise requested by the
Developer and approved by the Transportation
Department.
1. Prior to recordation of or issuance of
certificates of occupancy of a cumulative total
of more than 344 dwelling units, 40 -acre
Adventure Park, and 50,000 square feet of retail
(or equivalent densities as approved by the
Transportation Department), the Developer shall
construct the improvements specified in
proffered conditions S.B.1, 5.3.2 (when
warranted), and 5.B.3.
21-381
6/23/2021
2. Prior to recordation of or issuance of
certificates of occupancy of a cumulative total
of more than 670 dwelling units, 40 -acre
Adventure Park, and 100,000 square feet of
retail (or equivalent densities as approved by
the Transportation Department), the Developer
shall construct the improvements specified in
proffered conditions S.B.4, 5.B.5, 5.B.7, and
5.B.8 (if warranted with addition of right turn
lane).
3. Prior to recordation of or issuance of
certificates of occupancy of a cumulative total
of more than 920 dwelling units, 40 -acre
Adventure Park, and 100,000 square feet of
retail (or equivalent densities as approved by
the Transportation Department), the Developer
shall construct the improvements specified in
proffered conditions 5.B.6, and 5.B.8.
E. Prior to any future development plan approval, a
phasing plan for all the road improvements set forth
in Proffered Condition 5 shall be submitted to and
approved by the Transportation Department and shall
include the above referenced phases (Proffered
Condition 5.D.). Road improvements not addressed in
this phasing plan condition may be warranted or
required prior to the development thresholds noted
above. (T)
With the approval of this request, Proffer 9 of Case 16SNO704
shall be amended to read as follows: J
6. Route 288 Right -of -Way Dedication.
a. Within 120 days of the Board of Supervisors approval
of this request, the owner/developer shall dedicate,
free, to and for the benefit of Chesterfield County,
right-of-way for the potential vehicular access from
southbound Route 288, through the Property, to
westbound Genito Road (the "Route 286 Access"), as
generally shown on a Plat titled "Proposed Genito
Road Exit Ramp Chesterfield County, Virginia Project
No. 13176.0 February 2021", attached as Exhibit
B. The exact location and alignment of this right-
of-way shall be approved by the Transportation
Department. At the time of dedication, the
owner/developer shall retain a temporary
construction easement or license to construct the
improvements shown on approved site plan 18PR0240.
b. If the future Route 288 Access design requires
additional right-of-way dedication (or easements)
that was not accommodated by Proffered Condition
9.a., within ninety (90) days of a written request
\\
■
by the Transportation Department, the
••/
owner/developer shall dedicate, free and
unrestricted, to and for the benefit of Chesterfield
County, any additional right-of-way (or easements)
for the Route 288 Access on the Property at no cost
to Chesterfield County, so long as such dedications
21-382
6/23/2021
do not impact any improvements constructed on the
Property. (T)
With the approval of this request, Proffer 19 of Case 16SN0704
shall be amended to read as follows:
7. The main water feature constructed and operated on the
Property shall be either:
A. A white water park that meets the minimum Olympic
l`r standards of 250 meters, 1.5% slope, and 12 m3/s (420
cu ft/s) stream flow and shall contain at a minimum
the following components:
1. Boat lift
2. Pump facility
3. Control room- 200 gross square feet of floor
area
4. Training center -500 gross square feet of floor
area
5. Employee center -1,200 gross square feet of
floor area
6. Operations center -2,000 gross square feet of
floor area
7. Boat and supply storage -3,000 gross square feet
of floor area. This facility shall not be the
Boat Sales and Storage permitted on Tract D as
provided for in Paragraph VII. A.5 of the Textual
Statement.
B. A surf pool consisting of at least the following
Ayes: Holland, Winslow, Ingle, Carroll and Haley.
Nays: None.
21ANOS4A
In Matoaca Magisterial District, Manage This, LLC; Kristy
Stopf; Karen Marsh; Kimberly Terry; Elicia Lambert; Richard
and Linda Stopf; Stopf Montez Development, LLC; and Daniel and
Jeannette Montez request rezoning from Agricultural (A) to
Multi -Family Residential (R -MF) with conditional use planned
development to permit exceptions to ordinance requirements and
development standards and amendment of zoning district map on
48.4 acres located in the southeast quadrant of Otterdale Road
and Woolridge Road known as 6711, 6721, 6801 and 6811 Otterdale
21-383
6/23/2021
components:
1.
Pool with a minimum size of 1 acre.
2.
Wave generating system of at least 200
ft in
length
3.
Control room - 200 gross square feet
of floor
area
4.
Training center - 500 gross square feet
of floor
area
5.
Employee center -1,200 gross square
feet of
floor area
G.
Operations center -2,000 gross square
feet of
floor area (P & H)
Ayes: Holland, Winslow, Ingle, Carroll and Haley.
Nays: None.
21ANOS4A
In Matoaca Magisterial District, Manage This, LLC; Kristy
Stopf; Karen Marsh; Kimberly Terry; Elicia Lambert; Richard
and Linda Stopf; Stopf Montez Development, LLC; and Daniel and
Jeannette Montez request rezoning from Agricultural (A) to
Multi -Family Residential (R -MF) with conditional use planned
development to permit exceptions to ordinance requirements and
development standards and amendment of zoning district map on
48.4 acres located in the southeast quadrant of Otterdale Road
and Woolridge Road known as 6711, 6721, 6801 and 6811 Otterdale
21-383
6/23/2021
Road and 6501, 6521 and 6611 Woolridge Road. Density will be
controlled by zoning conditions or ordinance standards. The
Comprehensive Plan suggests the property is appropriate for
Suburban Residential I use (Maximum of 2 dwellings per acre).
Tax IDs 708-673-8986 and 9356; 708-674-9214; 709-673-0443,
0697 and 4253; and 709-674-1957.
Mr. Harold Ellis presented a summary of Case 21SN0548 and
stated the Planning Commission recommended approval, but
Planning staff recommended denial because the density is higher
than the Comprehensive Plan.
Mr. Jeff Geiger, representing the applicant, stated the
applicant worked hard to reach out to neighbors and understand
their concerns about development of the property before filing
the request. He further stated one of the important concerns
was the provision of a buffer and the utilities connection
through two particular lots via an existing easement utilizing
directional boring. He stated with the input from neighbors,
the request has been improved from the original vision.
In response to Mr. Carroll's question relative to the
neighbors' drainage concerns, Mr. Geiger stated the applicant
walked the properties to understand their concerns. He further
stated the property slopes from Woolridge Road toward their
lots, and much of the naturally flowing drain field will be
captured within the proposed stormwater system.
Mr. Holland called for public comment.
Mr. Mark Degaraff, representing 20 homeowners in Fox Creek,
concurred that Boone Homes reached out to the homeowners. He i
stated the 50 -foot buffer is extremely important to the
homeowners, and the water basins will reduce the runoff. He
expressed support for the development.
Mr. Carl Schwendeman requested the extension of sidewalks along
Woolridge Road.
There being no one else to speak to the issue, the public
hearing was closed.
On motion of Mr. Carroll, seconded by Mr. Ingle, the Board
approved Case 21SN0548 and accepted the following proffered
conditions:
The property owners and applicant in this rezoning case,
pursuant to Section 15.2-2298 of the Code of Virginia (1950 as
amended) and the Zoning Ordinance of Chesterfield County, for
themselves and their successors or assigns, proffer that the
property under consideration (the "Property") will be developed
according to the following proffers if, and only if, the
rezoning request submitted herewith is granted with only those
conditions agreed to by the owners and applicant. In the event
this request is denied or approved with conditions not agreed
to by the owners and applicant, the proffer shall immediately
be null and void and of no further force or effect. These
proffered conditions include three exhibits: Exhibit A, Unit
Elevations dated January 4, 2021; Exhibit B, Conceptual Master
21-384
6/23/2021
Plan, prepared by Land Planning Solutions dated March 31, 2021:
and Exhibit C, Landscape Buffer, dated October 30, 2020.
1. Master Plan. The Textual Statement dated May 10, 2021,
shall be considered the Master Plan. (P)
2. Elevations and Exterior Facades. Development of the
Property shall be in general conformance with the
architectural appearance shown on the elevations attached
hereto as Exhibit A. Any substantial modifications to
the architectural appearance shown on these elevations
shall be approved by the Planning Commission at the time
of plans review. (P)
a. Roof materials shall be 30 year
architectural/dimensional asphalt composition
shingle or standing seam metal.
b. Street facing facades of each building, in the
aggregate, shall have a minimum of twenty five (25)
percent brick or stone masonry, but in no event shall
a non -street facing facade have less than ten (10)
percent brick or stone masonry. The height of the
brick and stone shall be permitted to vary to allow
for a mixture of design features. Measurement of the
requirement for masonry facade treatment shall be
exclusive of facades within courtyards screened with
a minimum six (6) foot vinyl fence, as well as
windows, gable vents, dormers, doors, front door
alcoves, trim, soffit, fascia, balconies and
porches.
(W C. Dwelling units shall be sided with brick, brick
veneer, stone, stone veneer, cast stone, engineered
wood, horizontal lap, horizontal board and batten or
a combination thereof. Siding may also be
manufactured from natural wood, cement fiber board
or premium quality vinyl siding. Plywood and metal
siding are not permitted. Other materials may be
used for parapets, cornices, surrounds, trim,
architectural decorations, and design elements.
d. Premium quality vinyl is defined as vinyl siding with
a minimum wall thickness of .044" as evidenced by
manufacturer's printed literature.
e. A minimum of two (2) facing materials shall be used
on any facade of all buildings.
3. Age Restriction. All units developed on the Property
shall qualify as "housing for older persons" in accordance
with the criteria set forth in Code of Virginia Section
36-96.7, et al., as amended. Further, the Applicant, prior
to construction of the first multifamily building, shall
prepare and record restrictive covenants that define the
qualification for initial and subsequent occupancy of any
age restricted unit associated with the Property and shall
further restrict households to include at least one (1)
person who is age 55 years or older and to prohibit persons
under 19 years of age. This restriction shall be recorded
21-385
6/23/2021
among the land records of Chesterfield County, Virginia
and encumber the Property prior to the occupancy of any
age restricted unit. (P)
4. Utilities. Public water and wastewater shall be used.
(U)
5. Sidewalks. Sidewalks shall be provided on both sides of
the interior streets. (P)
6. Lighting. Street lights shall be decorative with a
residential character and a non -glare design. Street
lights shall have a maximum height of 15'. Street lights
shall be placed with an average spacing of 200' between
light poles on one side of the street using a staggered
placement on the other side of the street so that the
result is an average spacing of 100' between light poles
on alternating sides of the street. This spacing may be
adjusted in order to avoid conflicts with utilities,
driveway entrances and intersections. (P)
7. Driveways. All private driveways and front walks shall
be "hardscaped" (brushed concrete, stamped concrete,
asphalt or pavers). Front walks shall be a minimum of 3
feet in width. (P)
8. Foundation Treatment. All exposed portions of the
foundation, with the exception of exposed piers supporting
front porches of each new dwelling unit shall be faced
with brick, brick veneer, stone, stone veneer or cast
stone measured to a minimum of eighteen (18") inches above
grade. (P)
9. Foundation Plantings. Foundation planting beds shall be
required along the entire fagade of buildings which face
public streets, excluding decks, stoops, porches, patios,
architectural features and garages, and shall contain a
minimum of fifty (50) percent evergreen material and have
one shrub per three linear feet of foundation planting
bed. (P)
10. Road Cash Proffer. For each dwelling unit, the applicant,
sub -divider, or assignee(s) shall pay $2,914 per dwelling
unit to the County of Chesterfield for road improvements
within the service district for the property. Each
payment shall be made prior to the issuance of a
certificate of occupancy for a dwelling unit unless state
law modifies the timing of the payment. Should
Chesterfield County impose impact fees at any time during
the life of the development that are applicable to the
property, the amount paid in cash proffers shall be in
lieu of or credited toward, but not be in addition to,
any impact fees, in a manner determined by the County.
Cash proffer payments may be reduced for the cost of road
improvements provided by the Applicant, sub -divider, or
assignee(s), as determined by the Transportation
Department. (T)
11. Dwelling Size. The dwelling units shall have a minimum
finished floor area of 1,500 square feet. (P)
21-386
6/23/2021
12. Garage Doors. Any garage doors visible from a street shall
use an upgraded garage door. An upgraded garage door is
C. Application of Anionic PAM, Flexible Growth Medium
and/or a County -approved equivalent shall be applied
to denuded areas during construction and at final
stabilization in the locations shown on plans
approved by Environmental Engineering at the time of
plans review.
` d. If one or more basins will be constructed with a
manmade compacted embankment, the owner of the
Properties shall submit a dam break analysis to the
Department of Environmental Engineering at the time
of plans review. This analysis shall show that no
downstream homes or structures will be impacted in
the event of a dam failure.
e. Sheet flow generated from impervious areas located
on lots that are adjacent to the northern and eastern
property lines shall be collected using stormwater
control measures, such as swales, and diverted to
the new stormwater basins, as approved by the
Director of Environmental Engineering, at the time
of construction plan review.
15. Access. The exact location of each access shall be
approved by Chesterfield County Transportation Department
with each location as generally shown on the Conceptual
Layout. (P)
a. Direct vehicular access to the property from
woolridge Road shall be limited to one (1)
entrance/exit.
b. Direct vehicular access from the property to
Otterdale Road shall be limited to one (1)
21-387
6/23/2021
any door with a minimum of two (2) enhanced features.
Enhanced features shall include windows, raised panels,
decorative panels, arches, hinge straps or other
architectural features on the exterior that enhance the
entry (i.e. decorative lintels, shed roof overhangs
arches, columns, keystones, eyebrows, etc.) Flat panel
garage doors shall be prohibited. (P)
13. Density. Density shall be limited to a maximum of one
hundred ninety-four (194) dwelling units. (P)
14. Environmental Engineering. (EE)
a. Super Slit Fence, or an alternative as approved by
the Department of Environmental Engineering, shall
be provided as a perimeter control in locations where
standard silt fence would have been required.
b. Sediment traps and sediment basins sized at least
25% larger than the minimum Virginia Erosion and
Sediment Control Handbook's Standard shall be
provided.
C. Application of Anionic PAM, Flexible Growth Medium
and/or a County -approved equivalent shall be applied
to denuded areas during construction and at final
stabilization in the locations shown on plans
approved by Environmental Engineering at the time of
plans review.
` d. If one or more basins will be constructed with a
manmade compacted embankment, the owner of the
Properties shall submit a dam break analysis to the
Department of Environmental Engineering at the time
of plans review. This analysis shall show that no
downstream homes or structures will be impacted in
the event of a dam failure.
e. Sheet flow generated from impervious areas located
on lots that are adjacent to the northern and eastern
property lines shall be collected using stormwater
control measures, such as swales, and diverted to
the new stormwater basins, as approved by the
Director of Environmental Engineering, at the time
of construction plan review.
15. Access. The exact location of each access shall be
approved by Chesterfield County Transportation Department
with each location as generally shown on the Conceptual
Layout. (P)
a. Direct vehicular access to the property from
woolridge Road shall be limited to one (1)
entrance/exit.
b. Direct vehicular access from the property to
Otterdale Road shall be limited to one (1)
21-387
6/23/2021
entrance/exit, which may be full access upon approval
by VDOT.
16.
Road Improvements. Prior to issuance of any certificate
of occupancy, the following road improvements shall be
completed, as determined by the Chesterfield County
Transportation Department. Any modification to the
alignment, design and length shown on the Conceptual Plan
and/or specified below shall be approved by the
Chesterfield County Transportation Department. (T)
a
a. Construction of additional pavement along the
northbound lane of Woolridge Ridge at the approved
access into the Property to provide a separate right -
turn lane with 200' of taper and 200' of stacking.
b. Construction of additional pavement along the
westbound lane of Otterdale Road at the approved
access into the Property to provide a separate right -
turn lane with 200' of taper and 200' of stacking.
C. Construction of additional pavement along the
eastbound lane of Otterdale Road at the approved
access into the Property to provide a separate left -
turn lane with 200' of taper and 200' of stacking.
d. Construction of a VDOT standard sidewalk along
Woolridge Road and Otterdale Road for the entire
Property frontage.
e. Dedication to and for the benefit of Chesterfield
County, free and unrestricted of any additional
right-of-way required for these improvements.
17.
Stormwater. The post -development 2, 10 and 100 -year peak
discharge rate shall not exceed the pre -development 2, 10
and 100 -year peak discharge rate, respectively. (EE)
18.
Amenities. A Clubhouse with a park area, other park
areas, and walking trails shall be provided as generally
shown on Conceptual Layout. Other amenities to be
provided include a dog park and a hardscaped patio area
providing seating and outdoor cooking area. (P)
19.
Parking Enforcement. The declaration creating the
restrictive covenants for the condominium association for
this project, and, the condominium association documents,
shall prohibit the parking on one side of internal streets
and shall provide the condominium association the power
to tow vehicles parking on the wrong side of the street.
Further, the condominium association shall work with the
Chesterfield Fire Department, at the request of the Fire
Department, to educate the members on the reason for
limiting parking to one side of internal streets and the
power of the condominium association to tow vehicles.
•/
Upon request from the Fire Department, the condominium
association shall provide the Fire Department with its
operational procedures for towing offending vehicles and
shall modify these procedures as required by the Fire
Department. The recorded declaration and the applicable
21-388
6/23/2021
condominium association documents shall be submitted to
the Planning Department and the Fire Department prior to
the issuance of the first building permit for a
residential dwelling in the project. (P, F)
20. Road Width. The roads shall have a minimum width of
thirty feet (30') from face -of -curb to face -of -curb. (P,
T)
21. Conceptual Layout. The site shall be developed in general
conformance with the layout depicted on Exhibit B
("Conceptual Layout"). The Conceptual Layout is
conceptual in nature and may vary based on the final site
plan depending on the final soil studies, RPA lines, road
design, building footprints, BMP design, other design or
engineering reasons or as otherwise approved by the
Planning Commission at the time of plans review. (P)
22. Utility Easements Through Buffer. Any storm sewer line
and easement installed within the buffer area along the
western property line shall be installed at an angle with
evergreen trees (e.g. Leyland Cypress) planted along the
exterior boundaries of the easement area located within
the buffer area. The intent of this proffer is to minimize
the view shed created in the buffer area by the
installation of the storm sewer line. The exact location
and spacing for these plantings shall be determined at
the time of plans review and approval.
Any sanitary sewer line and easement installed within the
buffer area along the western property line shall be
installed with plantings in general conformance with
Exhibit C. The exact location and spacing for these
plantings shall be determined at the time of plans review
and approval; provided, however, that no trees shall be
planted within the sanitary sewer easement. (U)
Ayes: Holland, Winslow, Ingle, Carroll and Haley.
Nays: None.
21SN0527
In Dale Magisterial District, Kenneth Lankey, Lynda Heithaus,
and Simon Green request rezoning from Light Industrial (I-1)
and Agricultural (A) to Light Industrial (I-1) on 21.43 acres
with conditional use planned development to permit a
contractor's office, shop and storage yard on 13.4 acres and
exceptions to development standards, plus an exception to
Section 18-60 of the Utility Ordinance for connection to the
public wastewater system on 21.43 acres and amendment of zoning
district map fronting approximately 1,700 feet on the north
line of Whitepine Road, 900 feet north of Redpine Road. Density
will be controlled by zoning conditions or ordinance standards.
The Comprehensive Plan suggests the property is appropriate
for Industrial use. Tax IDs 762-674-7547; 762-675-7236; and
763 -674 -Part of 2875.
Mr. Cash presented a summary of Case 21SN0527 which consists
of two requests. He stated the Planning Commission recommended
21-389
6/23/2021
approval of both requests, and staff recommended approval of
Request I, but Utilities recommended denial of Request II.
Mr. Holland called for public comment.
There being no one to speak to the issue, the public hearing
was closed.
On motion of Mr. Holland, seconded by Mr. Ingle, the Board
approved Case 21SN0527 (Requests I and II) and accepted the
following proffered conditions:
The Applicant in this case, pursuant to Section 15.2-2298 of
the Code of Virginia (1950 as amended) and the Zoning Ordinance
of Chesterfield County, for itself and its successors or
assigns, proffer that the property under consideration in this
case number 21SN0527 ("the Property") will be used according
to the following proffers if, and only if, the request
submitted herewith is granted with only those conditions agreed
to by the Applicant. In the event this request is denied or
approved with conditions not agreed to by the owners and
Applicant, the proffer shall immediately be null and void and
of no further force or effect.
The applicants proffer the following conditions:
1. Master Plan. The Master Plan for the Property shall
consist of the following, which are made a part of these
proffered conditions by this reference thereto, and shall
be considered the Master Plan:
a. The Textual Statement dated May 7, 2021.
b. The Conceptual Plan, Exhibit A, Consolidated Plat -
Simon Green - Proposed Acquisition- Chesterfield,
VA, dated 11/14/2020, prepared by KEL. Development
of the Property shall generally conform to the
Conceptual Plan. (P)
2. Dedication. Prior to any site plan approval, dedication
of a seventy (70) foot wide right of way for the proposed
north/south collector from the western Property line,
through the Property, to the eastern Property line,
generally located along the northern property line, free
and unrestricted, to and for the benefit of Chesterfield
County. The exact location of this right-of-way shall be
approved by the Transportation Department. (T)
3. Access. At such time the North/South Collector is
constructed, the Whitepine Road access shall be removed
and access to the Property shall be provided from/to the
North/South Collector, unless otherwise approved by the
Transportation Department. (T)
4. On -Site Detention. The maximum post -development drainage
discharge rate for the 100 -year storm shall be limited to
the maximum capacity of the existing facilities
downstream, as well as the recorded/established 100 -year
backwater and/or floodplain shall not be increased. On-
site detention of the post -development 100 -year discharge
rate to below the pre -development 100 -year discharge rate
may be provided to satisfy this requirement. (EE)
21-390
6/23/2021
7. Future Wastewater Connection. In the event the public
wastewater system is extended to a point within 200 feet
of the property, the public wastewater system shall be
extended to the property a point acceptable to the
Utilities Department and all uses requiring domestic
wastewater shall be connected to the public wastewater
system. (U)
8. Public Water Connection. The proposed development shall
connect to the public water system. The site plan for the
subject property shall include the installation of a fire
hydrant on Whitepine Road at the entrance to the private
road. (U)
Ayes: Holland, Winslow, Ingle, Carroll and Haley.
Nays: None.
16. PUBLIC HEARINGS
16.A. TO CONSIDER CONVEYANCE OF A 40' PERMANENT EASEMENT
AND A 10' TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT TO CO
GAS OF VIRGINIA, INC. AT MIDLOTHIAN HIGH SCHOOL
Mr. Dean Sasek, Real Property Manager, stated this date and
time has been advertised for a public hearing for the Board to
consider the conveyance of a 40 -foot permanent easement and a
10 -foot temporary construction easement to Columbia Gas of
Virginia, Inc. at Midlothian High School. He further stated
Columbia Gas needs the easements to construct additional gas
lines to provide service to the growing Midlothian area. He
stated county and Schools staff have reviewed the request and
recommend approval.
Mr. Holland called for public comment.
There being no one to speak to the issue, the public hearing
was closed.
On motion of Ms. Haley, seconded by Mr. Winslow, the Board
authorized the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors and the
21-391
6/23/2021
5. Public Wastewater Exception. The exception to the use of
the public wastewater shall only apply to the 21.12 acre
parcel, as shown on "Consolidated Plat - Simon Green -
Proposed Acquisition- Chesterfield, VA, dated 11/14/2020,
prepared by KEL", provided the use is limited to a
contractor's office, shop and storage yard use. Any
development of the property for additional lots or uses,
other than the aforementioned, shall be required to
conform to the Code at that time for the provision of
public wastewater. (U)
6. Public Wastewater Easements. Any site plan or building
permit for the subject parcel shall provide and dedicate
public wastewater easements in locations acceptable to
the Utilities Department to accommodate the future
extension of the public wastewater system. Such easements
shall be dedicated prior to the site plan or building
permit approval. (U)
7. Future Wastewater Connection. In the event the public
wastewater system is extended to a point within 200 feet
of the property, the public wastewater system shall be
extended to the property a point acceptable to the
Utilities Department and all uses requiring domestic
wastewater shall be connected to the public wastewater
system. (U)
8. Public Water Connection. The proposed development shall
connect to the public water system. The site plan for the
subject property shall include the installation of a fire
hydrant on Whitepine Road at the entrance to the private
road. (U)
Ayes: Holland, Winslow, Ingle, Carroll and Haley.
Nays: None.
16. PUBLIC HEARINGS
16.A. TO CONSIDER CONVEYANCE OF A 40' PERMANENT EASEMENT
AND A 10' TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT TO CO
GAS OF VIRGINIA, INC. AT MIDLOTHIAN HIGH SCHOOL
Mr. Dean Sasek, Real Property Manager, stated this date and
time has been advertised for a public hearing for the Board to
consider the conveyance of a 40 -foot permanent easement and a
10 -foot temporary construction easement to Columbia Gas of
Virginia, Inc. at Midlothian High School. He further stated
Columbia Gas needs the easements to construct additional gas
lines to provide service to the growing Midlothian area. He
stated county and Schools staff have reviewed the request and
recommend approval.
Mr. Holland called for public comment.
There being no one to speak to the issue, the public hearing
was closed.
On motion of Ms. Haley, seconded by Mr. Winslow, the Board
authorized the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors and the
21-391
6/23/2021
County Administrator to execute an agreement with Columbia Gas
of Virginia, Inc. for conveyance of a 40 -foot permanent
easement and a 10 -foot temporary construction easement. (It is
noted a copy of the plat is filed with the papers of this
Board.)
Ayes: Holland, Winslow, Ingle, Carroll and Haley.
Nays: None.
16.B.
Mr. Sasek stated this date and time has been advertised for a
public hearing for the Board to consider the conveyance of an
18 -foot easement to Columbia Gas of Virginia, Inc. for service
to Moseley Elementary School and Glen Abbey at Magnolia Green
Subdivision. He further stated the request has been reviewed,
and staff recommended approval.
Mr. Holland called for public comment.
There being no one to speak to the issue, the public hearing
was closed.
On motion of Mr. Winslow, seconded by Mr. Carroll, the Board
authorized the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors and the
County Administrator execute an agreement with Columbia Gas of
Virginia, Inc. for conveyance of an 18 -foot easement for
service to Moseley Elementary School and Glen Abbey at Magnolia
Green Subdivision. (It is noted a copy of the plat is filed
with the papers of this Board.)
Ayes: Holland, Winslow, Ingle, Carroll and Haley.
Nays: None.
16.C. TO CONSIDER THE FY2023 AND FY2024 TRANSPORTATION
ALTERNATIVES PROJECTS
J
Mr. Brent Epps, Director of Transportation, stated this date
and time has been advertised for a public hearing for the Board
to consider the FY2023 and FY2024 Transportation Alternatives
Program (TAP) projects. He further stated TAP funding is
intended for smaller scale, non-traditional transportation
projects, and VDOT accepts applications for funding on a
biennial basis. He stated the projects are financed with 80
percent VDOT funds and a required 20 percent local match. He
further stated staff recommended approval of 5 projects:
Courthouse Road (Route 10 to Fallow Drive) Shared Use Path
project, the Fall Line Trail (Shop Street to Chester Linear
Park) project, the Fall Line Trail (West Westover Avenue to
Fairfax Avenue) project, the Route 360 at Courthouse Road
Pedestrian Improvement project and the Route 360 at Turner Road
Pedestrian Improvement project.
Mr. Holland called for public comment.
21-392
6/23/2021
Mr. Carl Schwendeman inquired whether there were any plans to
build new sidewalks along Old Buckingham Road to connect
Huguenot to the Food Lion.
Ms. Haley stated she believed Mr. Schwendeman has her contact
information as Midlothian representative and she would be happy
to discuss that with him.
There being no one else to speak to the issue, the public
hearing was closed.
l`✓ On motion of Mr. Winslow, seconded by Ms. Haley, the Board
adopted the following resolution supporting FY2023 and FY2024
Transportation Alternatives Program (TAP) projects:
WHEREAS, it is necessary that the local governing body
request, by resolution, approval of a proposed transportation
alternatives project.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of
Supervisors of Chesterfield County requests the Commonwealth
Transportation Board provide funding for the Courthouse Road
(Route 10 to Fallow Drive) Shared Use Path project, the Fall
Line Trail (Shop Street to Chester Linear Park) project, the
Fall Line Trail (West Westover Avenue to Fairfax Avenue)
project, the Route 360 at Courthouse Road Pedestrian
Improvement project and the Route 360 at Turner Road Pedestrian
Improvement project.
AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Board hereby agrees
to pay 20 percent of the total estimated cost of $550,000 for
construction of the Courthouse Road (Route 10 to Fallow Drive)
Shared Use Path project, 20 percent of the total estimated cost
of $575,000 for construction of the Fall Line Trail (Shop
Street to Chester Linear Park) project, 20 percent of the total
estimated cost of $350,000 for construction of the Fall Line
Trail (West Westover Avenue to Fairfax Avenue) project, 20
percent of the total estimated cost of $450,000 for
construction of the Route 360 at Courthouse Road Pedestrian
Improvement project and 20 percent of the total estimated cost
of $1,000,000 for construction of the Route 360 at Turner Road
Pedestrian Improvement project.
And, further, the Board, upon approval by VDOT, appropriated
up to $2,925,000 in anticipated VDOT reimbursement, and
transferred up to $565,000 in county appropriations for local
match funds.
Ayes: Holland, Winslow, Ingle, Carroll and Haley.
Nays: None.
21-393
6/23/2021
16.D. CODE AMENDMENT
RELATIVE TO ROUTE 1
RESIDENTIAL OVERLAY
`
AREA BOUNDARY
(21PJ0112)
Mr. Cash stated this
date and time has been advertised for a
public hearing for the
Board to consider
an amendment to the
County Code relative
to the Route 1 Residential Overlay Area
Boundary (21PJ0112).
He summarized the
proposed change to
adjust the southern boundary of the Route 1
Residential Overlay
21-393
6/23/2021
from Osborne Road to Route 288 and to provide a provision to
permit site plans applied for under overlay provisions in the
excluded area to continue, provided they remain valid under
the county's ordinances. He stated the Planning Commission and
Planning staff recommended approval.
Mr. Holland called for public comment.
Ms. Renae Eldred spoke in support of the code amendment.
Ms. Kim Marble with ROAR spoke in support of moving the
boundary to Route 288. She stated ROAR would like to see
additional changes for this overlay to provide community input
early in the process of making those changes.
There being no one else to speak to the issue, the public
hearing was closed.
On motion of Mr. Winslow, seconded by Mr. Ingle, the Board
adopted the following ordinance:
AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE CODE OF THE COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD,
1997, AS AMENDED, BY AMENDING AND REENACTING SECTION 19.1-53
OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE RELATIVE TO ROUTE 1 RESIDENTIAL
OVERLAY AREA
BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield
County:
(1) That Section 19.1-53 of the Code of the County of
Chesterfield, 1997, as amended, is amended and re-enacted, to \\\
read as follows:
Chapter 19.1
ZONING
Sec. 19.1-53. Restricted I scs Listed as"R- or "RS".
Those uses listed as "R" or "RS" in Table 19.1-52.A. shall be permitted in the respective
zoning districts provided that the restrictions as outlined below are met. If the restrictions
cannot be met, the use may be allowed in the respective zoning district through either a
Conditional Use or Special Exception.
000
Dwelling, multifamily
000
2. C-3, C-5 Districts:
a. Project fronts Jefferson Davis Highway north of Osborne Road and south of
Route 288, has a valid site plan submitted prior to June 23, 2021, and property is
recommended for Neighborhood Business, Community Business, Suburban `
Residential II, Residential Mixed Use or Community Mixed Use in the
Comprehensive Plan or project fronts Jefferson Davis Highway north of Route
288 and is recommended for Neighborhood Business, Community Business,
Suburban Residential II, Residential Mixed Use or Community Mixed Use in the
Comprehensive Plan;
b. Except as provided herein, use is located within 500 feet of Jefferson Davis
Highway, this would not preclude accessory parking or buildings from extending
21-394
6/23/2021
21-395
6/23/2021
beyond the 500 feet. Within a development the director of planning may approve
units to be up to 800 feet from Jefferson Davis Highway where:
i, no more than 50 percent of the development's multifamily dwellings
are located beyond 500 feet from Jefferson Davis Highway;
ii. the project has a building containing a permitted principal use within
50 feet of, and directly fronting, Jefferson Davis Highway; and
iii. the impact of such project extension on adjacent residentially zoned
property is mitigated through increased buffer, walls or other site or
building design improvements as approved at time of plan review;
c. Project has a minimum of 100 feet of contiguous frontage along Jefferson Davis
Highway;
d. Project size is no less than 3 acres and no more than 10 acres, provided that
projects of 1.5 acres shall be permitted if located at the intersection of a local road
with Jefferson Davis Highway;
e. Minimum density is 15 dwelling units per acre;
f. In addition to buffers required by Table.19.1-263.A.1.b., where use is located
adjacent to an occupied C or 1 property outside of project, a buffer shall be
provided between use and the adjacent property as required between the
applicable C or I district and a R -MF zoning district;
g. Project meets Northern Jefferson Davis Highway Design District (NJDHDD)
standards as identified in Sec. 19.1-379 except as otherwise stated within this
subsection;
E For projects containing less than 6 acres, buildings shall be a minimum of 3 stories
and a maximum of 4 stories. For projects 6 acres or more, buildings shall be a
minimum of 3 stories and a maximum of 6 stories. In no case shall the height of
a building exceed 3 stories or 40 feet within 100 feet of MH or R districts;
i. The greater of 50 square feet per residential unit or 10 percent of total project area
shall be provided as hardscaped or landscaped common area. Up to 50 percent of
required common area may include rooftop garden space where such space is
commonly accessible to, and provides elements designed to facilitate social and
activity space for, residents;
j. At least 50 percent of residential units located above ground floor shall have a
usable balcony consisting of a minimum area of 5 feet by 8 feet. Through the
utilization of up to two of the below, the percentage of balconies required may be
reduced to no less than 30 percent of residential units located above ground floor
as provided below:
i. 10 percent reduction for the inclusion of commonly shared internal
space a minimum of 20 square feet per residential unit in development
with amenities as deemed appropriate at time of plan review for the
social and recreational activity of residents. Such areas may also
include space intended to serve the educational and occupational
needs of residents but shall be exclusive of any area utilized for
leasing, maintenance or overall management of the development;
ii. 10 percent reduction where project common area is increased by 10
percent and there is the inclusion of outdoor amenities and facilities,
for active or passive recreation as deemed appropriate at time of plan
review for residents such as playground, pool, outdoor kitchen with
patio, patio with furniture, gazebo, walking trails, fitness stations or
similar; or
iii. 10 percent reduction for the provision of rooftop common area.
inclusive of required common area, a minimum of 20 square feet per
residential unit in development for social and recreational activity of
the residents;
At time of plan review, the director of planning may provide proportional
adjustment to the percentages of required balconies where determined that
elements proposed in i, ii, and iii above are included in combination at less that
the provided standards, but in no case shall such adjustment be reduced to less
21-395
6/23/2021
than 30 percent of residential units located above ground floor having the required
balconies.
k.
Buildings shall be designed to impart harmonious proportions and avoid
monotonous facades or large bulky masses. Buildings containing multifamily
units shall possess architectural variety while at the same time have an overall
cohesive urban character. Design elements shall be included such as, but not
limited to, wall offsets, balconies, terraces, articulation of doors and windows,
sculptural or textural relief of facades, banding and patterning of masonry,
architectural ornamentation, varied rooflines, other appurtenances such as
lighting fixtures and plantings that achieve desired design;
1.
The first floor of a building directly fronting Jefferson Davis Highway shalt meet
applicable commercial building code requirements so as to provide for tlexibitity
to accommodate either commercial or residential uses. The first floor of a
building directly fronting a road shall be on grade with adjacent pedestrian
walkway and have a minimum of 12 foot ceilings, or a higher standard if required
by commercial building code, where fronting Jefferson Davis Highway. This is
not intended to preclude the use of an interior elevated floor design for residential
uses to provide privacy;
m.
In addition to requirements of the NJDHDD, architecture for buildings containing
dwellings shall employ masonry at least to top of first floor on all facades visible
from a road;
n.
Commercial uses in the project are limited to those permitted in a C-2 district,
excluding automobile accessory store, automobile rental, automobile self service
station and automobile self service station, unmanned;
o.
Views of parking areas shall be minimized from public rights of way and/or single
family residential properties via a building, landscaping, architectural walls
and/or decorative fencing; and
p.
Administrative site plan review times shall be in accordance with Sec.19.1-30
with the exception that initial review for such projects shall not be acted upon any
sooner than 21 days from the latter of the date of required sign posting or written
notification sent.
000
Dwelling, townhouse
1. C-3, C-5 Districts:
a. Project in which located fronts Jefferson Davis Highway north of Osborne Road
and south of Route 288, has a valid site plan submitted prior to June 23, 2021, and
is recommended for Neighborhood Business, Community Business, Suburban
Residential 11, Residential Mixed Use or Community Mixed Use in the
Comprehensive Plan or project fronts Jefferson Davis Highway north of Route
288 and is recommended for Neighborhood Business, Community Business,
Suburban Residential 11, Residential Mixed Use or Community Mixed Use in the
Comprehensive Plan;
b. Use shall not directly front upon Jefferson Davis Highway, this shall not preclude
fronting upon a local road, provided that in all instances a permitted use shall be
located between townhouse buildings and Jefferson Davis Highway;
c. Project has a minimum of 100 feet of contiguous frontage along Jefferson Davis
Highway;
d. Commercial uses in project are limited to those permitted in a C-2 district,
excluding automobile accessory store, automobile rental, automobile self service
station and automobile self service station, unmanned;
e. Project size is no less than 3 acres and no more than 10 acres;
f Minimum density is 10 dwelling units per acre;
g. 10% of project acreage is provided as recreational area for residents, having active
and passive facilities as deemed appropriate during plan review;
21-396
6/23/2021
V
C
h. In addition to buffers required by Table.19.1-263.A.1.b., where use is located
adjacent to an occupied C or I property outside of project, a buffer shall be
provided between use and the adjacent property as required between the
applicable C or I district and a R-TH zoning district;
i. Project meets Northern Jefferson Davis Highway Design District (NJDHDD)
standards as identified in Sec.19.1-379 except as otherwise stated within this
subsection;
j. Buildings may be up to 4 stories or 50 feet, whichever is less, provided that if
within 100 feet of MH or R district the height shall not exceed three stories or 40
feet;
k. Buildings shall be designed to impart harmonious proportions and avoid
monotonous facades or large bulky masses. Townhouse buildings shall possess
architectural variety while at the same time have an overall cohesive urban
character. Design elements such as, but not limited to, balconies, terraces,
articulation of doors and windows, sculptural or textural relief of facades,
architectural ornamentation, varied rooflines, other appurtenances such as
lighting fixtures and plantings may be used to achieve desired design;
1. Excluding the incorporation of storefront windows, buildings containing
dwellings shall comply with architectural requirements of the NJDHDD and
employ masonry materials on all facades visible from a road;
in. Garages shall be rear loaded and shall be accessed via private pavement. Garage
doors shall not face any road or parking serving commercial use on property that
is open to the public;
n. Views of parking areas shall be minimized from public rights of way and/or single
family residential properties via a building, landscaping, architectural wall and/or
decorative fencing.
o. View of uses in alleys shall be minimized from roads and private pavement, other
than alleys, with a wall, maintenance -free fence, or building design. Utilized walls
and fencing shall be of comparable material and design to that of the townhouses;
and
p. Excluding fencing in n. and o. above, where fencing is utilized on a lot it shall be
constructed of decorative maintenance -free material. Chain link or wood fencing
shall not be permitted.
(2) That this ordinance shall become effective immediately
after adoption.
Ayes: Holland, Winslow
Nays: None.
Ingle, Carroll and Haley.
16.E. CODE AMENDMENT RELATIVE TO RESOURCE PROTECTION AREA
DESIGNATIONS FOR FAMILY SUBDIVISIONS (21PJ0110)
Mr. Cash stated this date and time has been advertised for a
public hearing for the Board to consider an amendment to the
County Code relative to Resource Protection Area (RPA)
Designations for Family Subdivisions (21PJ0110). He reviewed
the current requirements and the proposed changes. He stated
the changes required working with the Department of
Environmental Quality (DEQ) and obtaining its approval. He
further stated the Planning Commission and Planning staff
recommended approval.
Mr. Holland called for public comment.
There being no one to speak to the issue, the public hearing
was closed.
21-397
6/23/2021
On motion of Mr. Carroll, seconded by Ms. Haley, the Board
adopted the following ordinance:
AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE CODE OF THE COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD,
1997, AS AMENDED, BY AMENDING AND REENACTING SECTION 17-56 OF
THE SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE AND SECTION 19.1-S23 OF THE ZONING
ORDINANCE RELATING TO RESOURCE PROTECTION AREA DESIGNATIONS
FOR FAMILY SUBDIVISIONS
BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield
County:
(1) That Sections 17-56 and 19.1-523 of the Code of the County
of Chesterfield, 1997, as amended, are amended and re-enacted,
to read as follows:
CHAPTER 17
SUBDIVISION OF LAND
000
Sec. 17-56. Plan and plat requirements.
000
21-398
6/23/2021
j
Application Type
In addition to any requirements for a specific application,
the following items shall be provided as specified for eacha
m
a
plat or plan type when the applicable column is marked
°-�
dam°-
w
with an "X".
w
a
A. The following shall be provided as general notes:
24. Environmental features:
a. The limits of established watercourses, manmade
drainage conveyance systems, mapped dam break
inundation zones, preliminary wetland boundaries and
X
X
their anticipated impacts, floodplains, conservation
areas, RPAs and approximate location and surface area
of BMPS1131
b. CBPA areas as described in chapter 19.1113111°1
X
X
X
X
c. Location and labeling of conservation areas, wetlands,
RPAs, floodplains, backwater(s), and elevations with
X
X
survey tielines and /or tiedownsl'41
d. CBPA preservation areas described in chapter 19. 1,
with a note indicating the method of CBPA
X
X
compliance, the type of facility utilized, as well as
recordation information
25. A note with corresponding reference symbol for wetlands
stating 'Jurisdictional wetlands shall not be disturbed
X
X
without written permission from the appropriate state
and/or federal agencies"
21-398
6/23/2021
j
[1 ] For preliminary plats, the contact information of the owner, subdivider, and, if known, the
proposed owner. This contact information shall include mailing address, street address,
phone number, fax number and electronic mail address.
[2] Calculations for open space and areas to be conveyed in accordance with Sec. 17-71 shall
include the area for noncontiguous sections and the total area.
[3] If required by the director of planning or director of environmental engineering.
[4] Final plat should reference ownership and maintenance responsibilities.
[51 Provide a note on plat that contains the conditions proposed for such disposal and use as
specified in Sec. 17-71.
[6] USGS quadrangle sheets are not an accepted source for the required information. The
director of environmental engineering may require contour labeling at other appropriate
intervals depending upon plan and topography.
[7] All lots and parcels shall be buildable.
[8] Foran overall conceptual plan, there shall be depicted a general pedestrian circulation layout
and general location of any proposed arterial, collector or residential collector street.
[9] Where any easement bisects a property, provide tie -downs to property corners on final plat.
[10] The utility layout must be consistent with the county's water and sewering specifications
and procedures. Any deviation must be requested in writing and is subject to approval by
the director of utilities.
[I l] For an overall conceptual plan, large onsite and offsite water mains and trunk wastewater
lines along with the corresponding tie in points shall be depicted.
[12] If approved by the director of utilities, where such a depiction is not feasible, a note may be
provided indicating the approximate distance and contract number of the existing water or
wastewater line.
[ 13] For an overall conceptual plan, the general limits of such features shall be provided.
[14] A Resource Protection Area designation may be deferred at time of plan review for a lot or
parcel within a line modification plat where the director of environmental engineering
determines that there is sufficient evidence to suggest environmental features do not exist
on a resulting parcel or the proposed modification is unlikely to affect the buildability of the
resulting lot or parcel. For any plat deferred under this footnote an advisory certificate shall
be provided on the plat which states "The mapping information is not intended to represent
all topographic and environmental features on the lots or parcels which could limit or
preclude the ability to construct a residential dwelling and/or other structures. A Resource
Protection Area designation and/or other additional engineering research on such items as,
but not limited to: soil type, wetlands, floodplains, adequate culverts for driveway crossings
of streams or floodplains, etc. will be required based upon individual lot/parcel requirements
at time of building permit or plan review." In addition, a deed restriction shall be recorded
on each property which states "This lot/parcel was modified without mapping and research
of topographic and environmental features that may limit or preclude the ability to construct
21-399
6/23/2021
Application Type
In addition to any requirements for a specific application,
the following items shall be provided as specified for each
plat or plan type when the applicable column is marked
fi
w
with an "X".W
0
06
a
a.
26. A note with an asterisk on each lot between RPA limits
and water feature(s) stating 'Resource protection area
X
X
(RPA) to remain in its natural state; no structure to be
located within the RPA"
27. A note with corresponding reference symbol for any lot or
parcel which is located, in whole or in part, on a FEMA
floodplain stating "Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of
Occupancy for any dwelling, a FEMA National Flood
X
X
Insurance Program Elevation Certificate, completed by a
licensed professional, shall be filed with the director of
environmental engineering"
[1 ] For preliminary plats, the contact information of the owner, subdivider, and, if known, the
proposed owner. This contact information shall include mailing address, street address,
phone number, fax number and electronic mail address.
[2] Calculations for open space and areas to be conveyed in accordance with Sec. 17-71 shall
include the area for noncontiguous sections and the total area.
[3] If required by the director of planning or director of environmental engineering.
[4] Final plat should reference ownership and maintenance responsibilities.
[51 Provide a note on plat that contains the conditions proposed for such disposal and use as
specified in Sec. 17-71.
[6] USGS quadrangle sheets are not an accepted source for the required information. The
director of environmental engineering may require contour labeling at other appropriate
intervals depending upon plan and topography.
[7] All lots and parcels shall be buildable.
[8] Foran overall conceptual plan, there shall be depicted a general pedestrian circulation layout
and general location of any proposed arterial, collector or residential collector street.
[9] Where any easement bisects a property, provide tie -downs to property corners on final plat.
[10] The utility layout must be consistent with the county's water and sewering specifications
and procedures. Any deviation must be requested in writing and is subject to approval by
the director of utilities.
[I l] For an overall conceptual plan, large onsite and offsite water mains and trunk wastewater
lines along with the corresponding tie in points shall be depicted.
[12] If approved by the director of utilities, where such a depiction is not feasible, a note may be
provided indicating the approximate distance and contract number of the existing water or
wastewater line.
[ 13] For an overall conceptual plan, the general limits of such features shall be provided.
[14] A Resource Protection Area designation may be deferred at time of plan review for a lot or
parcel within a line modification plat where the director of environmental engineering
determines that there is sufficient evidence to suggest environmental features do not exist
on a resulting parcel or the proposed modification is unlikely to affect the buildability of the
resulting lot or parcel. For any plat deferred under this footnote an advisory certificate shall
be provided on the plat which states "The mapping information is not intended to represent
all topographic and environmental features on the lots or parcels which could limit or
preclude the ability to construct a residential dwelling and/or other structures. A Resource
Protection Area designation and/or other additional engineering research on such items as,
but not limited to: soil type, wetlands, floodplains, adequate culverts for driveway crossings
of streams or floodplains, etc. will be required based upon individual lot/parcel requirements
at time of building permit or plan review." In addition, a deed restriction shall be recorded
on each property which states "This lot/parcel was modified without mapping and research
of topographic and environmental features that may limit or preclude the ability to construct
21-399
6/23/2021
a residential dwelling and/or other structures. A Resource Protection Area designation
and/or other additional engineering research on such items as, but not limited to: soil type,
wetlands, floodplains, adequate culverts for driveway crossings of streams or floodplains,
etc. will be required based upon individual parcel/lot requirements at time of building permit
or plan review." For a family subdivision plat resulting in one new parcel created
from a larger undeveloped parcel, a Resource Protection Area designation may be
deferred on the parent parcel where the director of environmental engineering
determines that there is sufficient evidence to suggest environmental features do not
exist on the parent parcel or the proposed subdivision is unlikely to affect the
buildability of the parent parcel. For any such plat an advisory certificate, as
referenced in this section, shall be provided on the plat. Further subdivision of the
parent parcel under this provision will require a Resource Protection Area
000
CHAPTER 19.1
ZONING
000
A. As part of, or prior to, the zoning application or plan review processes, or during the
review of a water quality impact assessment pursuant to Section 19.1-524.E., a
reliable, site-specific evaluation shall be conducted and approved by the
environmental engineering department to determine whether water bodies on or
adjacent to the proposed development site have perennial flow. The Resource
Protection Area boundaries for the site shall then be adjusted, as necessary, based on
this evaluation. Upon the completion of a countywide map depicting streams with
perennial flow, as identified utilizing a scientifically valid method approved by the
State Water Control Board, the site-specific evaluations shall no longer be required.
B. The director of environmental engineering may adjustthe delineation of any resource
protection area boundaries when an environmental site assessment prepared by a
qualified expert indicates a need for change based on the environmental features listed
in Section 19.1-520.B. I through 19.1-520.B.4. The environmental site assessment
shall be drawn to scale and shall clearly delineate such environmental features.
Wetlands delineations shall be performed in accordance with the procedures specified
in the most recently approved edition(s) of the Federal Manual for Identifying and
Delineating Jurisdictional Wetlands.
C. The director of environmental engineering may adjust the delineation of any resource
management area boundaries when an environmental site assessment prepared by a
qualified expert indicates a need for such change based on the environmental features
listed in Section 19.1-521.B. The environmental site assessment shall be drawn to
scale and shall clearly delineate such environmental features. Wetlands delineations
shall be performed in accordance with the procedures specified in the most recently
approved edition(s) of the Federal Manual for Identifying and Delineating
Jurisdictional Wetlands.
D. Any person aggrieved by the director of environmental engineering's decision
concerning the boundaries of a resource protection area or a resource management
area may appeal such decision in accordance with Section 19.1-30.C.
E. Boundary adjustments shall not be available to property that is undergoing
redevelopment if, due to previous development of the property, the Chesapeake Bay
21-400
6/23/2021
preservation area features listed in Section 19.1-520.13. or Section 19.1-521.B. cannot
be determined.
F. A Resource Protection Area designation maybe deferred at time of plan review for a
Line Modification or Family Subdivision plat in accordance with Section 17-56.
(2) That this ordinance shall become effective immediately
after adoption.
Ayes: Holland, Winslow, Ingle, Carroll and Haley.
Nays: None.
16.F. TO CONSIDER THE FY2021 APPROPRIATION OF $22.9
ND SECONDARY SCHOOL EMERI
FUNDS
Mr. Durkin stated this date and time has been advertised for
a public hearing for the Board to consider the FY2021
appropriation of $22.9 million in Federal Elementary and
Secondary School Emergency Relief II (ESSER II) funds. He
further stated the plan includes two years of summer school
($10 million); online learning/digital curriculums ($2
million); personal protective equipment (PPE) and school
safety, touchless equipment ($5.5 million); air quality
maintenance ($1 million); and technology ($2 million).
Mr. Holland called for public comment.
Ms. Wendy Little expressed concerns relative to Schools' use
of CARES Act funding for special needs students such as her
son. She asked that the ESSER funds be allocated to special
needs students.
There being no one to speak to the issue, the public hearing
was closed.
In response to Mr. Winslow's question relative to the
allocation of recovery of learning funds, Mr. Harris stated
staff could get that information to the Board. He further
stated use of ESSER II funds is tightly drawn up, but there
would be more latitude with ESSER III funds. He stated staff
would provide all of the relevant information for ESSER III
funds well ahead of the public hearing in July.
Mr. Holland asked Mr. Harris and Dr. Casey to report back to
him with more details on Ms. Little's particular situation.
Ms. Haley stated she contacted Ms. Dot Hefron on the School
Board regarding Ms. Little's situation, but she was not certain
of the current status.
On motion of Mr. Ingle, seconded by Ms. Haley, the Board
appropriated $22.9 million in Federal Elementary and Secondary
School Emergency Relief II (ESSER II) funds.
Ayes: Holland, Winslow, Ingle, Carroll and Haley.
Nays: None.
21-401
6/23/2021
16.G. TO CONSIDER AMENDMENTS TO THE FY2021 ADOPTED BUDGET
RELATED TO THE REVISED MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING
WITH DOMINION ENERGY
Mr. Durkin stated this date and time has been advertised for
a public hearing for the Board to consider amendments to the
FY2021 Adopted Budget related to the revised Memorandum of
Understanding with Dominion Energy. He further stated the
action is to appropriate $68 million to projects to maintain
and improve access to county facilities impacted by the removal
of coal ash from storage ponds, with $13 million going to Parks
and Recreation projects and $55 million going to transportation
projects.
Mr. Holland called for public comment.
There being no one to speak to the issue, the public hearing
was closed.
On motion of Mr. Carroll, seconded by Ms. Haley, the Board
approved amendments to the FY2021 adopted budget appropriating
$68 million associated with the revised Memorandum of
Understanding with Dominion Energy.
Ayes: Holland, Winslow, Ingle, Carroll and Haley.
Nays: None.
16.H. TO CONSIDER AMENDMENTS TO FY2021 AND FY2022 ADOPTED
BUDGETS FOR THE COUNTY CENTRAL VIRGINIA TRANSPORTATION
AUTHORITY FUND
Mr. Durkin stated this date and time has been advertised for
a public hearing for the Board to consider amendments to the
FY2021 and FY2022 adopted budget for the County Central
Virginia Transportation Authority (CVTA) Fund. He further
stated the action is for the county's appropriations resolution
for capital projects, and no additional spending is proposed.
He stated staff requests the establishment of appropriation
authority for the county for $20.7 million in FY2021 and $20.6
million in FY2022.
Mr. Holland called for public comment.
There being no one to speak to the issue, the public hearing
was closed.
On motion of Mr. Carroll, seconded by Ms. Haley, the Board
approved an amendment creating a budget in both FY2021 and
FY2022 for the separate fund which manages the local portion
of CVTA funds for Chesterfield projects, in accordance with
financial best practices and guidelines set out by the CVTA,
as follows: FY2021 - $20,686,857 and FY2022 - $20,569,600.
Ayes: Holland, Winslow, Ingle, Carroll and Haley.
Nays: None.
21-402
6/23/2021
16.I. TO CONSIDER AMENDMENTS TO THE FY2022 OPERATING AND
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN BUDGETS FOR CHESTERFIELD
COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS AND APPOMATTOX REGIONAL
GOVERNOR'S SCHOOL TOTALING UP TO $12,420,500
Mr. Durkin stated this date and time has been advertised for
a public hearing for the Board to consider amendments to the
FY2022 Operating and Capital Improvement Plan Budgets for
Chesterfield County Public Schools and Appomattox Regional
Governor's School totaling up to $12,420,500. He further stated
l_r revised state revenue estimates may increase by up to $16.5
million, but staff requested only $12.4 million be appropriated
at this time. He stated the additional $4.1 million would
remain as a resource for Schools in the future, and the final
use would depend on other ongoing financial discussions.
Mr. Holland called for public comment.
There being no one to speak to the issue, the public hearing
was closed.
On motion of Mr. Ingle, seconded by Ms. Haley, the Board
adopted amendments to the FY2022 Operating and Capital
Improvement Plan Budgets for Chesterfield County Public
Schools and Appomattox Regional Governor's School totaling up
to $12,420,500.
And, further, the Board adopted the
following resolution:
School Operating Fund
26,918,200
Estimated Revenue
39,949,400
Local Sources
17,260,800
State
409,005,800
Federal
43,711,600
Transfers
28,727,100
Transfer from School CIP to Grants
62,500
Transfer from School Operating to Grants
1,698,700
Transfer from School Food Services to Operating
800,000
Transfer from General Fund
Recurring Baseline
317,744,300
One Time Funding
15,000,000
Debt Service Reserve
-
Use of Assigned Fund Balance/Reserves
Use of Reserves for Food Services
1,491,000
Beginning Balance for Operating
1,000,000
Appropriations
Instruction
553,837,700
Administration
26,918,200
Pupil Transportation
39,949,400
Operatings and Maintenance
65,737,700
Technology
21,695,700
Debt Service
61,439,800
Food Services
28,727,100
Transfer to and/or Assignment for School Capital Improvement Program
9,469,100
Unassigned Fund Balance
-
21-403
6/23/2021
Appomattox Regional Governor's School
Estimated Revenue
Local Sources 3,113,400
State 1,378,700
Appropriations
Education
4,492,100
Schools CIP Fund
Estimated Revenue
Transfer from School Reserve for Future Capital Projects 9,469,100
Transfer from School Food Service 950,000
Note: An additional $5,000,000 in Schools project savings is already appropriated in the Schools
CIP fund that will be reallocated for new projects.
Appropriations
School Capital Projects
10,419,100
Ayes: Holland, Winslow, Ingle, Carroll and Haley.
Nays: None.
16.J. TO CONSIDER ACCEPTANCE AND APPROPRIATION OF UP TO
$68.4 MILLION FOR THE AMERICAN RESCUE PLAN ACT (ABPA)
Mr. Harris stated this date and time has been advertised for
a public hearing for the Board to consider the acceptance and
appropriation of up to $68.4 million for the American Rescue
Plan Act (ARPA). He further stated staff requests holding the
public hearing and then continuing it until July once the final
rules become available.
Mr. Holland called for public comment.
There being no one to speak to the issue, the public hearing
was closed.
Ms. Haley made a motion, seconded by Mr. Ingle, for the Board
to continue the public hearing to consider acceptance and
appropriation of up to $68.4 million for the American Rescue
Plan Act (ARPA) to July 28, 2021.
Mr. Winslow stated it was interesting to note that there was
no one present to speak about all the funds the federal
government is sending localities.
Mr. Holland stated he did receive an email on sidewalks. He
then called for a vote on Ms. Haley's motion, seconded by Mr.
Ingle, for the Board to continue the public hearing to consider
acceptance and appropriation of up to $68.4 million for the
American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) until July 28, 2021.
Ayes: Holland, Winslow, Ingle, Carroll and Haley. J
Nays: None.
21-404
6/23/2021
16.K. TO CONSIDER AN ORDINANCE TO ADJUST THE BOUNDARIES OF
VOTING PRECINCTS 203 AND 209 IN THE DALE MAGISTERIAL
DISTRICT
There being no one to speak to the issue, the public hearing
was closed.
On motion of Ms. Haley, seconded by Mr. Ingle, the Board
adopted the following ordinance:
AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE CODE OF THE COUNTY OF
CHESTERFIELD, 1997, AS AMENDED, BY AMENDING AND
RE-ENACTING SECTION 7-3 REGARDING PRECINCT
BOUNDARIES AND POLLING PLACES
BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield
County:
Mr. Jeff Mincks stated this date and time has been
advertised
Code of the County of
for a public hearing for the Board to consider an
ordinance
as amended, is
amending the County
Code to adjust the boundaries
of voting
precincts 203 and
209 in the Dale magisterial district. He
Sec. 7-3. Precinct
further stated the
amendment is necessary due to
a current
l`r
split in the House
of Delegates line.
of Great Branch to its intersection with Salem Church Road
Mr. Holland called
for public comment.
There being no one to speak to the issue, the public hearing
was closed.
On motion of Ms. Haley, seconded by Mr. Ingle, the Board
adopted the following ordinance:
AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE CODE OF THE COUNTY OF
CHESTERFIELD, 1997, AS AMENDED, BY AMENDING AND
RE-ENACTING SECTION 7-3 REGARDING PRECINCT
BOUNDARIES AND POLLING PLACES
BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield
County:
Bird Voting Precinct (203):
(1) That Section
7-3 of the
Code of the County of
Chesterfield, 1997,
as amended, is
amended and re-enacted to
read as follows:
Courthouse Road (State Route 2099); thence eastwardly along
Sec. 7-3. Precinct
boundaries and
polling places.
center line of Krause Road to its intersection with a creek
0 0 0
known as Great Branch; thence eastwardly along the center line
Bird Voting Precinct (203):
21-405
6/23/2021
Beginning at the point where the center line of Iron
Bridge Road (State Route 10) intersects the center line of
Whitepine Road (State Route 701); thence southwardly along the
center line of Iron Bridge Road to its intersection with
Courthouse Road (State Route 2099); thence eastwardly along
the center line of Courthouse Road to its intersection with
Krause Road (State Route 903); thence southwardly along the
center line of Krause Road to its intersection with a creek
known as Great Branch; thence eastwardly along the center line
of Great Branch to its intersection with Salem Church Road
(State Route 642); thence northwardly along the center line
of Salem Church Road to its intersection with Old Warson Drive
(State Route 1905); thence eastwardly along the center line
of Old Warson Drive (State Route 1905) to its intersection
with a tributary to Proctors Creek; thence northeasterly along
the center line of a tributary to Proctors Creek to its
intersection with a lake known as Salem Woods Lake; thence
northeasterly through the center line of Salem Woods Lake to
its intersection with a tributary to Proctors Creek; thence
northerly through the center line of a tributary to Proctors
Creek to its intersection with Proctors Creek; thence
northerly through the center line of Proctors Creek to its
intersection with Route 288; thence westwardly along the south
21-405
6/23/2021
lanes of Route 288 to its intersection with Salem Church Road
(State Route 642); thence northwardly along the center line
of Salem Church Road to its intersection with Bellmeadows Road
(State Route 1918); thence westwardly along the center line
of Bellmeadows Road to its intersection with Windingrun Lane
(State Route 1919); thence northwardly along the center line
of Windingrun Lane to its intersection with Retriever Road
(State Route (2022); thence westwardly along the center line
of Retriever Road to its intersection with Watchaven Lane
(State Route 2022); thence southwardly along the center line
of Watchaven Lane to its intersection with Huntingcreek Drive
(State Route 1913); thence northwestwardly along the center
line of Huntingcreek Drive to its intersection with Whitepine
Road (State Route 701); thence westwardly along the center
line of Whitepine Road to its intersection with Iron Bridge
Road; thence northwardly along the center line of Iron Bridge
Road to its intersection with Kingsland Creek, the point and
place of beginning.
The voting place for Bird Voting Precinct shall be Bird
High School, 10301 Courthouse Road.
Salem Church Voting Precinct (209):
Beginning at the point where the center line of Centralia
Road (State Route 145) intersects the center line of the
Seaboard Coast Line right-of-way; thence northwardly along the
center line of said right-of-way to its intersection with
Kingsland Road (State Route 611); thence westwardly along the
center line of Kingsland Road (State Route 611) to its
intersection with Salem Church Road (State Route 642); thence
southwardly along the center line of Salem Church Road (State
Route 642) to its intersection with the southbound lanes of
Route 288; thence eastwardly along the southbound lanes of
Route 288 to its intersection with Proctors Creek; thence
southwardly along the center line of Proctors Creek to its
intersection with a tributary to Proctors Creek; thence
continues southwardly along the tributary to Proctors Creek
to its intersection with a lake known as Salem Woods Lake;
thence southwestwardly through the center line of Salem Woods
Lake to its intersection with the tributary to Proctors Creek;
thence southwestwardly through the center line of a tributary
to Proctors Creek to its intersection with Old Warson Drive
(State Route 1905); thence eastwardly along the center line
of Old Watson Drive (State Route 1905) to its intersection
with Thornington Drive (State Route 629); thence eastwardly
along the center line of Thornington Drive (State Route 829)
to its intersection with Shiloh Drive (State Route 750);
thence southwardly along the center line of Shiloh Drive
(State Route 750) to its intersection with Centralia Road
(State Route 145); thence eastwardly along the center line of
Centralia Road (State Route 145) to its intersection with the
Seaboard Coast Line right-of-way, the point and place of
beginning.
The voting place for Salem Church Voting Precinct shall
be Salem Church Middle School. 9700 Salem Church Road.
21-406
6/23/2021
(2) That this ordinance shall become effective immediately
upon adoption.
Ayes: Holland, Winslow, Ingle, Carroll and Haley.
Nays: None.
16.L. TO CONSIDER THE ESTABLISHMENT OF FIVE SATELLITE
ABSENTEE VOTING LOCATIONS FOR ALL PRESIDENTIAL
PRIMARY AND GENERAL ELECTIONS
Mr. Mincks stated this date and time has been advertised for
a public hearing for the Board to consider an ordinance
amending the County Code to establish five satellite absentee
voting locations for all presidential primary and general
elections. He further stated the amendment adds one additional
satellite absentee voting location at Clover Hill Library and
makes clear that all five locations will be use for all general
and presidential primary elections in the future.
Mr. Carroll stated analysis conducted after the most recent
election determined North Courthouse and LaPrade libraries had
the highest absentee voter turnout. He further stated the
request to add this location was made after taking into
consideration the scope and size of the Matoaca District and
the growth and development in both Clover Hill and western Hull
Street.
Mr. Ingle stated he is still looking for a location in the
Bermuda District that makes sense.
Mr. Holland suggested looking at locations near the Bermuda
District boundaries. He stated this ordinance is an excellent
example of local government accommodating citizens who want to
vote. He then called for public comment.
There being no one to speak to the issue, the public hearing
was closed.
On motion of Mr. Carroll, seconded by Ms. Haley, the Board
adopted the following ordinance:
AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE CODE OF THE COUNTY OF
CHESTERFIELD, 1997, AS AMENDED, BY AMENDING AND
RE-ENACTING SECTION 7-4 REGARDING SATELLITE
ABSENTEE VOTING LOCATIONS
BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield
County:
(1) That Section 7-4 of the Code of the County of
Chesterfield, 1997, as amended, is amended and re-enacted to
read as follows:
Sec. 7-4. - Satellite absentee voting locations.
The following are established as satellite absentee
voting locations for all general elections and presidential
primary elections:
21-407
6/23/2021
(1) LaPrade Library, 9000 Hull Street Rd, North
Chesterfield, VA 23236.
(2) Meadowdale Library, 4301 Meadowdale Blvd, North
Chesterfield, VA 23234.
(3) North Courthouse Road Library, 325 Courthouse Road,
North Chesterfield, VA 23236.
(4) Ettrick-Matoaca Library 4501 River Road, South a
Chesterfield, VA 23803. J
(5) Clover Hill Library, 6701 Deer Run Drive,
Midlothian, VA 23112.
(2) That this ordinance shall become effective immediately
upon adoption.
Ayes: Holland, Winslow, Ingle, Carroll and Haley.
Nays: None.
17. REMAINING MANUFACTURED HOME PERMITS AND ZONING REQUESTS
There were no remaining manufactured home permits and zoning
requests.
18. FIFTEEN -MINUTE CITIZEN COMMENT PERIOD ON UNSCHEDULED
MATTERS
There were no requests to address the Board at this time.
On motion of Ms. Haley, seconded by Mr. Carroll, the Board
adjourned at 9:37 p.m. until July 28, 2021, at 2:00 p.m. for
a work session to be held in Room 502.
Ayes: Holland, Winslow, Ingle, Carroll and Haley.
Nays: None.
g
aseydministrator
21-408
6/23/2021
A
A
Attachment A
Board of Supervisors Meeting lune 23, 2021
Citizen Comments on Unscheduled Matters and Public Hearings
Comment
Date
First Name
Last Name
District
Category
Comments
6/21/2021
David
Leffert
Matoaca
Unscheduled
The repaving of roads in
Matter
Stoney Glen West have
been moved back for
consecutive years. They
have not been repaved
for over 25 years and
are a mess. What do we
need to do to get our
roads repaved?
21-409
6/23/2021