16SN0504
CASE NUMBER: 16SN0504
APPLICANT: Windswept Development LLC
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY, VIRGINIA
Magisterial District: MIDLOTHIAN
ADDENDUM
2200 N Otterdale Road
Board of Supervisors (BOS)
Public Hearing Date:
OCTOBER 28, 2015
BOS Time Remaining:
365 DAYS
Applicant’s Agent:
ANDREW M. SCHERZER
(804-794-0571)
Applicant’s Contact:
WINDSWEPT DEVELOPMENT LLC
(804-530-4614)
Planning Department Case Manager:
DARLA ORR (804-717-6533)
APPLICANT’S REQUESTS
REQUEST I: Amendments to Proffered Condition 3 of Case 05SN0329 to increase density and to
Proffered Condition 3 of Case 14SN0578 relative to cash proffers for the proposed additional
units.
REQUEST II: Exception to street access requirements to permit more than fifty (50) lots off of one (1)
access to a public road. Specifically, the applicant is requesting approval to permit a maximum of
sixty-two (62) lots off of one (1) access.
Expansion of a single-family residential subdivision, being developed as St. Ives subdivision, is
proposed. An additional 16 lots are proposed resulting in a maximum of 62 lots, yielding 1.2 dwelling
units per acre.
Note:
Conditions may be imposed or the property owner(s) may proffer other conditions.
ADDENDUM
The purpose of this Addendum is to provide revised comments received from the Environmental Engineering
Department.
Environmental Engineering comments are provided on Page 4.
Staff continues to recommend denial of this request as outlined on the following page.
Providing a FIRST CHOICE community through excellence in public service
RECOMMENDATIONS
RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF REQUESTS I (Zoning Amendments) AND
II (Street Access)
Addresses development impacts for additional dwe4llings,
PLANNING
with school cash proffer equal to full calculated impact
COMMISSION
Density is compatible with area development
(9/15/2015)
Street access exception prevents additional stream crossing
Ayes: Gulley, Waller, Patton and Wallin
Nays: Brown
RECOMMEND DENIAL OF REQUEST I (Zoning Amendments)
While the proposal addresses development impacts, it exceeds
residential density recommended by the Comprehensive Plan
STAFF
RECOMMEND DENIAL OF REQUEST II (Street Access)
Insufficient justification offered for granting exception
216SN0504-2015OCT28-BOS-ADD
SUMMARY OF IDENTIFIED ISSUES
Department Issue
Request I (Zoning Amendments)
Exceeds maximum density recommended as appropriate by
Comprehensive Plan (1.2 rather than 1 dwelling unit per acre)
PLANNING
Request II (Street Access)
Insufficient justification offered to support requested exception,
as outlined in the Subdivision Ordinance
BUDGET AND
MANAGEMENT
Cannot support exception to street access requirements to permit more
FIRE
than fifty (50) lots off of one (1) public road access
PARKS AND
RECREATION
LIBRARIES
SCHOOLS
CDOT
VDOT
UTILITIES
ENVIRONMENTAL
ENGINEERING
316SN0504-2015OCT28-BOS-ADD
ENVIRONMENTAL
Drainage, Erosion and Water Quality
Staff Contact: Scott Dunn (804-748-1030) dunns@chesterfield.gov
While final determination can only be made based on submittal of construction plans, the schematic
conceptual plan presented with the exception request will have the least environmental impact as
compared to a second road access on N Otterdale Rd.
416SN0504-2015OCT28-BOS-ADD
CASE NUMBER: 16SN0504
APPLICANT: Windswept Development LLC
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY, VIRGINIA
Magisterial District: MIDLOTHIAN
STAFF’S ANALYSIS
2200 N Otterdale Road
AND
RECOMMENDATION
Board of Supervisors (BOS)
Public Hearing Date:
OCTOBER 28, 2015
BOS Time Remaining:
365 DAYS
Applicant’s Agent:
ANDREW M. SCHERZER
(804-794-0571)
Applicant’s Contact:
WINDSWEPT DEVELOPMENT LLC
(804-530-4614)
Planning Department Case Manager:
DARLA ORR (804-717-6533)
APPLICANT’S REQUESTS
REQUEST I: Amendments to Proffered Condition 3 of Case 05SN0329 to increase density and to
Proffered Condition 3 of Case 14SN0578 relative to cash proffers for the proposed
additional units.
REQUEST II: Exception to street access requirements to permit more than fifty (50) lots off of
one (1) access to a public road. Specifically, the applicant is requesting approval to permit a
maximum of sixty-two (62) lots off of one (1) access.
Expansion of a single-family residential subdivision, being developed as St. Ives subdivision, is
proposed. An additional 16 lots are proposed resulting in a maximum of 62 lots, yielding 1.2
dwelling units per acre.
Notes:
A.Conditions may be imposed or the property owner(s) may proffer other conditions.
B.Proffered conditions, conditions of Cases 05SN0329 and 14SN0578 and a conceptual subdivision layout
are located in Attachments 1 - 4
Providing a FIRST CHOICE community through excellence in public service
RECOMMENDATIONS
RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF REQUESTS I (Zoning Amendments) AND
II (Street Access)
Addresses development impacts for additional dwe4llings,
PLANNING
with school cash proffer equal to full calculated impact
COMMISSION
Density is compatible with area development
(9/15/2015)
Street access exception prevents additional stream crossing
Ayes: Gulley, Waller, Patton and Wallin
Nays: Brown
RECOMMEND DENIAL OF REQUEST I (Zoning Amendments)
While the proposal addresses development impacts, it exceeds
residential density recommended by the Comprehensive Plan
STAFF
RECOMMEND DENIAL OF REQUEST II (Street Access)
Insufficient justification offered for granting exception
216SN0504-2015OCT28-BOS-RPT
SUMMARY OF IDENTIFIED ISSUES
Department Issue
Request I (Zoning Amendments)
Exceeds maximum density recommended as appropriate by
Comprehensive Plan (1.2 rather than 1 dwelling unit per acre)
PLANNING
Request II (Street Access)
Insufficient justification offered to support requested exception,
as outlined in the Subdivision Ordinance
BUDGET AND
MANAGEMENT
Cannot support exception to street access requirements to permit more
FIRE
than fifty (50) lots off of one (1) public road access
PARKS AND
RECREATION
LIBRARIES
SCHOOLS
CDOT
VDOT
UTILITIES
ENVIRONMENTAL
ENGINEERING
316SN0504-2015OCT28-BOS-RPT
416SN0504-2015OCT28-BOS-RPT
Map 2: Comprehensive Plan
Classification: LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL
The designation suggests the property is appropriatefor low density residential use with a maximum
of 1 dwelling unit per acre.
Map 3: Surrounding Land Uses & Development
N Otterdale Rd
Single family residential –
Brookcreek Crossing,
Rosemont and Salisbury
Route 288
N Otterdale Rd
Commercial and office use
– Watkins Center
516SN0504-2015OCT28-BOS-RPT
PLANNING
Staff Contact: Darla Orr (804-717-6533) orrd@chesterfield.gov
ZONING HISTORY
Case Number BOS Action Request
Rezone 50.7 acres from A to R-12 with Conditional Use
Limited to 46 lots
o
Transportation contribution for N. Otterdale Road
o
APPROVED
05SN0329
extension with initial development
3/8/2006
Optional senior occupancy
o
Conditions addressed buffers; architecture and
o
driveway treatment; open space; setbacks; and access
Amendment to Case 05SN0329 to:
Modify architectural standards, reduce garage
o
setbacks, and modify cash proffer relative to credit for
road improvements
Delete age restriction and upfront transportation
o
APPROVED
14SN0578 contribution
7/23/2014
N Otterdale Road extension planned to be built with
o
first phase of development
Approved conditions addressed: architecture and building
materials; landscaping; construction hours; setbacks for
front loaded garages and impacts on capital facilities
PROPOSAL
Amendments to the existing zoning and relief to street access requirements are proposed to permit
expansion of a single-family residential development, known as St. Ives subdivision. This
development was approved in 2005 with 46 lots on 50.7 acres yielding 0.9 dwelling units per acre,
in compliance with the Plan’s recommended density of 1 dwelling unit per acre.
REQUEST I (AMENDMENTS –DENSITY AND CASH PROFFERS):
With the proposed amendment to Proffered Condition 3 of Case 05SN0329, the permitted
density would increase from 46 to 62 lots. This would yield a density of 1.2 dwelling units per
acre, exceeding the Plan’s recommended density of 1 dwelling unit per acre.
Details regarding the amendment to cash proffers (Proffered Condition 3 of Case 14SN0578) may
be found in the “Financial Impact on Capital Facilities” section.
REQUEST II (RELIEF TO STREET ACCESS REQUIREMENTS):
To provide emergency vehicles access should one (1) entrance into a development become
blocked during an emergency situation, the Subdivision Ordinance (Section 17-76) requires a
second public road access for developments with a cumulative total of more than fifty (50) lots.
616SN0504-2015OCT28-BOS-RPT
The applicant is seeking relief to this street access requirement to permit sixty-two (62) lots to
be recorded off of the one (1) public road access to North Otterdale Road.
Through the zoning process, the Planning Commission may grant relief for a maximum of sixty-
two (62) lots off of one (1) access if a preliminary tentative plat is submitted with sufficient
documentation that clearly demonstrates:
A.Existing severe topographic, physical or extenuating circumstances exist so that
there is no other practical means of providing another access; and
B.Financial hardship is not the principal reason for the waiver; or
C.Without granting relief to these requirements traffic on an existing local street will
exceed the Planning Commission’s Stub Road Policy as determined by the Director of
Transportation.
The applicant has provided a conceptual subdivision layout and statement that an RPA through the
property would make it “impractical to build a second access to North Otterdale Road.” The
conceptual plan and justification do not demonstrate sufficient documentation to demonstrate
relief is appropriate. (Attachment 4)
Staff cannot support this request for relief:
Approval of this request would allow development of additional lots contrary to the
recommended density of the Plan
The request fails to meet the Ordinance criteria underwhich relief should be granted
716SN0504-2015OCT28-BOS-RPT
FINANCIAL IMPACT ON CAPITAL FACILITIES
Budget and Management
Staff Contact: Natalie Spillman (717-8767) spillmann@chesterfield.gov
The need for schools, parks, libraries, fire stations and transportation facilities in this area is
identified in the County’s adopted Public Facilities Plan, Thoroughfare Plan and Adopted Capital
Improvement Program and further detailed by specific departments in the applicable sections of
this request analysis.
This proposed development will have an impact on capital facilities. Staff has calculated the fiscal
impact of every new dwelling unit on schools, roads, parks, libraries and fire stations at $23,418 per
unit.
The original zoning Case (05SN0329) was approved in March 2008 with a density of forty-six (46)
units and with cash proffers based on age and non-age restricted options and a lump sum payment
to address transportation improvements. This case was amended in July 2014 (14SN0578), which
deleted the age restricted proffer as well as amended the cash proffer to the amount of $11,262, to
be allocated $1,198 for parks and recreation, $310 for libraries, $681 for fire and $9,073 for schools
and proffered road improvements in lieu of the transportation cash proffer. The applicant has
requested to amend the previously approved cases by modifying conditions in Case 05SN0329
relative to density and Case 14SN0578 relative to cash proffers.
The applicant has requested to increase the density by sixteen (16) units, for a maximum density of
sixty-two (62) units. To address the impact of this development on capital facilities, the applicant
has requested to modify the existing cash proffer condition which maintains the current amount of
$11,262 for the first forty-six (46) units and adds language for the remaining sixteen (16) lots to pay
the current maximum of $18,966. All other applicable conditions of the previously approved cases
would still apply, including the proffered transportation improvements in Case 14SN0578.
In this case for the additional sixteen (16) lots the applicant has proffered the full calculated
amount of $9,648 for schools (in lieu of $7,814), while allocating the remaining balance of the
$18,966 pro-rated among the other facility costs as follows: $911 for parks, $215 for libraries, $583
for fire stations and $7,609 for roads. While this deviates from the Board’s pro-rated category
allocations, staff is supportive of this proffer as a means to better address the impact of this
proposal on school capital facilities.
Note that circumstances relevant to this case, as presented by the applicant, have been reviewed,
and it has been determined that it is appropriate to maintain the current cash proffer of $11,262
on the first forty-six (46) units and accept the maximum cash proffer of $18,966 for the remaining
sixteen (16) units.
816SN0504-2015OCT28-BOS-RPT
16 (Potential Units)
Per Dwelling Unit Impact on Capital
Facilities
Facility Cash Proffer on Existing Applicant's Proposal
FY16 Calculated Impact
Categories Zoning – 46* (Current BOS Maximum)
Schools $9,648 $9,073 $9,648
Parks$1,347 $1,198 $911
Libraries$318 $310 $215
Fire Stations $861 $681 $583
Roads$11,244 $0 $7,609
Total $23,418 $11,262 $18,966
Overall Impact on Capital Facilities
Schools $154,368 $417,358 $154,368
Parks $21,552 $55,108 $14,576
Libraries $5,088 $14,260 $3,440
Fire Stations $13,776 $31,326 $9,328
Roads $179,904 $0 $121,744
Total $374,688 $518,052* $303,456
*The total overall impact on capital facilities for the cash proffer on existing number of units is
calculated against the proffered maximum number of units (46) per Case 05SN0329. Actual number
of units and corresponding impact may vary.
916SN0504-2015OCT28-BOS-RPT
PUBLIC FACILITIES
FIRE SERVICE
Staff Contact: Anthony Batten (717-6167)battena@chesterfield.gov
The mission of Fire and Emergency Medical Services (EMS) is to protect life, property and the
environment through a comprehensive fire and life safety program that ensures an adequate and
timely response to emergencies. The Public Facilities Plan, as part of the Comprehensive Plan,
indicates:
County-wide Fire & EMS Service Information & Needs
New5
Recommendations for Fire Stations
by 2022
Replacement/Revitalization4
Fire 24%
1
2011 Incidents as a percent of total
EMS (Emergency Medical Services)76%
Fire/EMS Increases in Call Volume
44%
from 2001 and 2011
County Population Increase from
17%
2001 to 2011
1
With the aging of population, medical emergency incidents are expected to increase faster than the rate of population
growth over time.
Fire Service - Project Impacts
Estimated Number of Calls for
Service Annually (For 16 additional 3
units)
Applicant’s Proposal to Address
Offered in accordance with Policy
1
Impacts
Proffered Condition 2
1
The financial impact of residential development on fire facilities is addressed in the “Financial Impact on Capital
Facilities” section of the report.
Additional Information:
Fire and EMS does not support the request to allow sixty-two (62) lots off of one (1) point of access.
When the property is developed, the number of hydrants, quantity of water needed for fire
protection, and access requirements will be evaluated during the plans review process.
Information relative to nearby fire and emergency service facilities can be found in Attachment5.
1016SN0504-2015OCT28-BOS-RPT
PARKS AND RECREATION
Staff Contact: Brian Geouge (318-8720) geougeb@chesterfield.gov
The County supports a high-quality park system to provide residents and visitors with equitable
access to active and passive recreation opportunities. The Public Facilities Plan, as part of the
Comprehensive Plan, indicates:
County-wide Parks and Recreation Needs
Park TypeNumber of New Parks Aggregate Acreage
Regional 3600
Community 10 790
Neighborhood 9180
Special Purpose 3 1 -
2
Urban - -
Linear 3 - -
1
The Public Facilities Plan notes facility recommendations for water-based parks. All other facilities are acquired and
developed on a site-by-site basis.
2
Facilities are recommended in urban areas where there is limited acreage available for park development.
3
Facility needs are assessed on a site-by-site basis as recommended in the Public Facilities Plan.
Parks and Recreation – Project Impacts
5.9 Acres of Regional, Community and/or Neighborhood
2012 County Level of Service
parkland per 1,000 persons
9 Acres of Regional, Community and/or Neighborhood
Target Level of Service
parkland per 1,000 persons
Offered in Accordance with Policy
Applicant’s Proposal to Address
1
Proffered Condition 2
Impacts
1
The financial impact of residential development on parks facilities is addressed in the “Financial Impact on Capital
Facilities” section of the report.
Additional Information:
Information relative to nearby parks and recreation facilities can be found in Attachment 5.
1116SN0504-2015OCT28-BOS-RPT
LIBRARIES
Staff Contact: Debra Winecoff (751-4475) winecoffd@chesterfield.gov
The public library system’s role in the county has expanded beyond its traditional function as a
resource for information and materials, and now serves as a community gathering place for
educational, cultural and informational services; community support during emergencies;
economic development; and revitalization activities. The Public Facilities Plan, as part of the
Comprehensive Plan, indicates:
County-wide Library Needs
Facility ActionCounty-wide Facility Needs
Expand or Replace 5 Libraries
Construction of New 5 Libraries
Facilities
1 Community Arts Center
Libraries -Project Impacts
Applicant’s Proposal to
Offered in accordance with Policy
1
Address Impacts
Proffered Condition 2
1
The financial impact of residential development on library facilities is addressed in the “Financial Impact on Capital
Facilities” section of the report.
Additional Library Information:
Information relative to nearby library facilities can be found in Attachment 5.
1216SN0504-2015OCT28-BOS-RPT
SCHOOLS
Staff Contact: Atonja Allen (804-318-8740) atonja_allen@ccpsnet.net
Highperforming, high quality public schools contribute to the quality of life and economic vitality of
the County. The Comprehensive Plan suggests a greater focus should be placed on linking schools
with communities by providing greater access, flexible designs and locations that better meet the
needs of the communities in which they are located. The Public Facilities Plan, as part of the
Comprehensive Plan, indicates:
County-wide School Needs
School Types Facilities to Revitalize/Replace New Facilities
Elementary 16 3
Middle 62
High23
Technical - 1
Schools -Project Impacts
Elementary 3
Middle 2
Average Student Yield
High 2
Total 7
Applicant’s Proposal to Offered in Accordance with Policy
1
Address Impacts Proffered Condition 2
1
The financial impact of residential development on school facilities is addressed in the “Financial Impact on Capital
Facilities” section of the report.
Additional Information:
After review of this request, based on current school assignments and student enrollment the
proposed rezoning case will have an impact on schools. It is possible that over time this case,
combined with other tentative residential developments and other zoning cases in the area will
continue to push these schools to their capacity and therefore impact the capacity of facilities
division-wide.
Information relative to schools currently serving area can be found in Attachment 5.
1316SN0504-2015OCT28-BOS-RPT
COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Staff Contact: Jim Banks (804) 748-1037 banksj@chesterfield.gov
The Comprehensive Plan, which includes the Thoroughfare Plan, identifies county-wide
transportation needs that are expected to mitigate traffic impacts of future growth. The
anticipated traffic impact of the proposal has been evaluated and recommendations are detailed in
the chart below:
Recommendation Applicant’s Proposal
Cash Proffer Policy
Offered in Accordance with Policy
Proffered Condition 2
VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Staff Contact: Brian Lokker (804-674-2384) brian.lokker@vdot.virginia.gov
No comment
1416SN0504-2015OCT28-BOS-RPT
WATER AND WASTEWATER SYSTEMS
Staff Contact: Jamie Bland (804-751-4439) blandj@chesterfield.gov
The request will have a minimal impact on the public utility systems. Theproposal’s specific impacts
are detailed in the chart below:
Water and Wastewater Systems
Currently Size of Existing LineConnection Required by County Code?
Serviced?
Water No 16” Yes
Wastewater No 15” & 21” Yes
Map 5: Existing Water & Wastewater Systems
1516SN0504-2015OCT28-BOS-RPT
ENVIRONMENTAL
Drainage, Erosion and Water Quality
Staff Contact: Doug Pritchard (804-748-1028) pritchardd@chesterfield.gov
Environmental Engineering has no comment on this request.
1616SN0504-2015OCT28-BOS-RPT
CASE HISTORY
Applicant Submittals
7/6/2015 Application submitted
8/17, 8/20 Applicant submitted amendments to proffered conditions and the conceptual
& 9/2/2015 subdivision layout
Community Meeting
8/19/2015 Issues Discussed:
Sidewalks should be provided on both sides of roads
All requirements of St. Ives should be maintained
Over-crowding and relief plans for Watkins Elementary
Planning Commission Meeting
9/15/2015Citizen Discussion
No one spoke to support or oppose the case
Applicant Discussion
Proposal offers full cash proffer for additional lots
Minimal increase in density over Planrecommendation
Exception to second access will avoid impact on creek and RPA
Commission Discussion
Mr. Waller stated expansion would meet conditions approved in original
case; full cash proffer is offered for additional units with Schools
receiving an amount equal to full calculated impact; and density is
compatible with area development
School analysis of capacities and district boundaries
Dr. Brown expressed safety was his concern and he could not support
approving more than 50 lots off of 1 access
Dr. Wallin indicated additionallots werebetter use for neighborhood
than large BMP originally planned.
Recommendation: APPROVAL AND ACCEPTANCE OF THE
PROFFERED CONDITIONS IN ATTACHMENT 1
Motion: Waller Second: Patton
AYES: Gulley, Waller, Patton and Wallin
NAYS: Brown
The Board of Supervisors on Wednesday, October 28, 2015, beginning at 6:30 p.m., will
consider this request.
1716SN0504-2015OCT28-BOS-RPT
ATTACHMENT 1
PROFFERED CONDITIONS
Note:
(CPC) – Recommended by the Planning Commission
With the approval of this request, Proffered Condition 3 of Case 05SN0329 and Proffered Condition
3 of Case 14SN0578 shall be amended as outlined below. All other conditions of Cases 05SN0329
and 14SN0578 shall remain in force and effect.
Proffered Condition 3 of Case 05SN0329 shall be amended to read as follows:
(CPC)1. The maximum density of this development shall not exceed sixty-two (62) lots. A
maximum of forty-five (45) lots shall be permitted on GPIN 718-713-4861 and a
maximum of seventeen (17) lots shall be permitted on GPIN 718-714-0248 and 717-
714-5888. (P)
Proffered Condition 3 of Case 14SN0578 shall be amended to read as follows:
(CPC)2. Cash Proffer: The applicant, sub-divider, or assignee(s) shall pay the following to the
County of Chesterfield, for infrastructure improvements within the service district for
the property:
A.For the first 46 dwelling units, the applicant, sub-divider, or assignee(s) shall pay
the following to the County of Chesterfield, prior to the issuance of a certificate
of occupancy for infrastructure improvements within the service district for the
property, unless state law prevents enforcement of that timing:
i.$11,262.00 per dwelling unit, for the period beginning the July 1 preceding
the Board of Supervisor’s approval of the case through July 1 four years later,
as which point the amount will be adjusted for the cumulate change in the
Marshall and Swift Building Cost Index during that time period. At the time of
payment $11,262.00 will be allocated pro-rata among the facility costs as
follows: $1,198.00 for parks and recreation, $310.00 for library facilities,
$9,073.00 for schools and $681.00 for fire stations.
ii.Thereafter, the per dwelling unit cash proffer amount shall be automatically
adjusted annually, by the annual change in the Marshall and Swift Building
Cost Index on July 1 of each year;
iii.Cash proffer payments shall be spent for the purposes proffered or as
otherwise permitted by law.
iv.Should any impact fees be imposed by the County of Chesterfield at any time
during the life of the development that are applicable to the property, the
1816SN0504-2015OCT28-BOS-RPT
amount paid in cash proffers shall be in lieu of or credited toward, but not be
in addition to, any impact fees, in a manner determined by the County. (B &
M)
B.For each dwelling unit in excess of 46, the applicant, sub-divider, or assignee(s) shall
pay the following to the County of Chesterfield, prior to the issuance of a building
permit for infrastructure improvements within the cash proffer service district for
the property, unless state law prevents enforcement of that timing:
i.$18,966.00 per dwelling unit for the period beginning the July 1 preceding
the Board of Supervisors’ approval of the case through July 1 four years later,
at which point the amount will be adjusted for the cumulative change in the
Marshall and Swift Building Cost Index during that time period. The $18,966
will be allocated pro-rata among the facility costs as follows: $9,648.00 for
schools, $911.00 for parks and recreation, $215.00 for library facilities,
$7,609.00 for roads, and $583.00 for fire stations.
ii.Thereafter, the per dwelling unit cash proffer amount shall be automatically
adjusted, annually, by the annual change in the Marshall and Swift Building
Cost Index on July 1 of each year.
iii.Cash proffer payments shall be spent for the purposes proffered or as
otherwise permitted by law.
iv.Should any impact fees be imposed by the County of Chesterfield at any time
during the life of the development that are applicable to the property, the
amount paid in cash proffers shall be in lieu of or credited toward, but not be
in addition to, any impact fees, in a manner determined by the County. (B &
M)
1916SN0504-2015OCT28-BOS-RPT
ATTACHMENT 2
CASE 05SN0329
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
2016SN0504-2015OCT28-BOS-RPT
2116SN0504-2015OCT28-BOS-RPT
2216SN0504-2015OCT28-BOS-RPT
2316SN0504-2015OCT28-BOS-RPT
2416SN0504-2015OCT28-BOS-RPT
2516SN0504-2015OCT28-BOS-RPT
2616SN0504-2015OCT28-BOS-RPT
ATTACHMENT 3
CASE 14SN0578
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
2716SN0504-2015OCT28-BOS-RPT
2816SN0504-2015OCT28-BOS-RPT
2916SN0504-2015OCT28-BOS-RPT
3016SN0504-2015OCT28-BOS-RPT
3116SN0504-2015OCT28-BOS-RPT
3216SN0504-2015OCT28-BOS-RPT
3316SN0504-2015OCT28-BOS-RPT
3416SN0504-2015OCT28-BOS-RPT
3516SN0504-2015OCT28-BOS-RPT
ATTACHMENT 4
CONCEPTUAL SUBDIVISION LAYOUT and JUSTIFICATION REQUEST II
August 19, 2015
3616SN0504-2015OCT28-BOS-RPT
ATTACHMENT 5
SUPPLEMENTAL PUBLIC FACILITIES STATISTICS
SUPPLEMENTAL PUBLIC FACILITIES STATISTICS
Schools Currently Serving Area
Watkins
Midlothian Midlothian
Elementary
Middle School High School
School
Capacity
Functional Functional Functional
MembershipMembershipMembership
% Capacity
% Capacity% Capacity
CapacityCapacityCapacity
Categories
Current
and
Projected
2014 1011 818124 1225 1506 81 1472 1569 94
2
Figures
2015 1033 -126 1206 - 80 1548 - 99
2016 1051 -128 1213 - 81 1591 - 101
2021 1072 -131 1211 - 80 1802 - 115
Trailers Number of
3 - 0
1
Trailers
1
Trailers are not identified in the staff report for schools under 90% capacity.
2
Disclaimer: Please note that Projected Membership AND Functional Capacity are updated on an ANNUAL BASIS.
They are based on the September 30 membership and Space Utilization Study Report for a given year. School
boundary adjustments may be made to address over capacity levels.
Nearby Public Facilities
Fire Station Midlothian Fire Station, Company Number 5
EMS Facility Forest View Volunteer Rescue Squad
Library Midlothian Library
Parks & Recreation Watkins Annex and Mid-Lothian Mines Parks
3716SN0504-2015OCT28-BOS-RPT