Loading...
04/23/1975 Packet COUNTY OF FAIRFAX OFFICE OF ASSESSMENTS THE MASSEY BUILDING 4100 CHAIN BRIDGE ROAD FAIRFAX, VIRGLNIA' 22030 TO: ALL FAIRFAX COUNTY BUSINESS LICENSEES Enclosed is your 1975 Business License Application which has been pre-printed by computeK:.from your 1974 license. You need only insert info~rpation concerning your gross receipts. If necessary, please make any corrections required. The application you have received must be filed by Jan. 31,. 1975. The rate of tax for each category is shown on the back of this sheet. Your category is shown under the "Ordinance Section" of the license application. These rates are effective as of January 1, 1975. Please do not compute your tax on this application. Also, do not remit payment when filing your application. You will be billed seParately for your license which must be paid by April 15, 1975. You are urged to file your application prior to January 31~ and pay your license tax by April 15th to avoid separate 10% penalties for late filing and/or late payment. The law is inflexible with respect to penalties as well as interest which rm~st be charged for late payment. Enc'losed is a self-addressed envelope for your convenience in filing your license application on time. If you require assistance, please phone my office at 691-2511. Your cooperation in complying with the licensing laws of Fairfax County is appreciated. PFM-AO-55 7s"- ¢? /p?,: ~ .6.,o,, h e, e - ~...... d ,~ o .,,. -,C.. = ~ . 9' BOARD OF SUPERVISORS COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD AGENDA April 23, 1975 9:00 a.m. Approval of Minutes ~ ~ Water Control Board and Corps of Engineers on Appomattox 10:00 County Engineer ~,~,~// Drainage Study UMTA Section 5 Agreement VI Capital Area Agency on Aging - Vacancy VII Game Claims VIII Erroneous Tax Claims 11: 00 a.m. ..~X X Mrs. Knoop - Report on Midl0thian Library Petition on Library 11:30 a.m. ~XI. Mr. William Cox to Speak Pornography and Increase J ->~-" in VEPCO Rates on ~ XII. Budget Request of George W. Moore, Jr. XIII. Bid on Police Van XIV. Recommendation on Money Lending License Tax 12:0_p_O_~oon LUNCH _2:00 p.m. XV. Zoning XVI. Miscellaneous Matters EXPLANATION OF AGENDA I2~,~S April 23, 1975 II. The FloodPlain Studies have been completed on the Appomattox River under the aegis of the Water Control Board. III. Under the County Engineer's agenda, you will note that the Pocono Water Tank will be discussed and the Board is expected to pass a resolution authorizing the purchase of the two homes in question. IV. The Drainage Study will again be discussed by Bill Prosise. Vo The UMTA Agreement is a matter On which the County must agree: it deals specifically with Mass Transit. Lou Barretta would like the Board to fill a yacancy presently existing on the Capital Area Agency on Aging. Mrs. Rose Scutter has been suggested. IX. According to the people in the Midlothian area, Mrs, Knoop has been slow to react on the Midlothian Library. She will give her report at 11:00. Xo The Board should receive a petition left at the Courthouse in support of the Library Branch in Clover Hill. XI. Self-explanatory. XII. The Treasurer is presenting the Board with a copy of his budget as presented to the State Compensation Board. XIV. Jack Williams recommends that the Board do nothing on the money lending license tax until after the next General Assembly. There are a number of casual miscellaneous matters--none of which are of major importance. ~'~;ST ,~F. ALT¥ .~2~O~TG~G~ Corp. Ar, Af[;'~'~ of Firs~ & Merchants Corporation ~510 V~ v Lawn Drive ~ P.O. Box 26~80 Richmond, Virginia 23260 Telephone 804/264-4234 February 11, 1975 Commissioner of Revenue Chesterfield Court Hoase .Chesterfield, Virginia 23832 Attn: Mr. C. E. Jones Dear Mr. ~Jones: The attached license questionnaire was received by this office on February 5, 1975. Previous inquiry of your office had indicated that no license was required of firms such as First Realty Mortgage Corp. .I am attaching a check in the amount of $1,949.49 which is paid under protest. I view the charge as not a license fee but a disguised income tax based not on profits but gross revenues. I feel that the charge is applied in a discriminatory manner i.e. Section 5-103 (Savings & Loan Associations) compared to Section 5-104 which you have indicated applies to this firm. The total of $1,949.49.1icense tax is viewed as excessive when compared to other areas of our operation within and outside the State of Virginia. A total of 2 employes are involved in our Chesterfield office and profits in todays lending market cannot support such charges. Sincerely Dwain Wise, President Encl. DW/] j G;o'~;;,~: Adann-,, M~ri¢;tta Ohio: Colurnbus BUSINESS' LOFESSIONAL AND OCCUPATI0bL _L~ICENSE TAX * 1975 RATES Ordinance Section 25 -38 25 -39 25-~0 25 -41 25 -42 25 -43 25 -44 25-45 25 -46 25 -47 25 -49 25 -50 25 -51 25-52 25 -53 25 -54 25 -55 Category Amusements Builders and Developers Business Service Personal Service Contra¢ tots Hotels & Motels Professionals Renting by Owner Repair Service Retail Merchant Wholesale Merchant Excavators Money Lenders i~'~ Stamp Suppliers Telephone Co. Heat, light, etc. Merchant Placing Vending Machine 1975 Rate $0.26 $0.05 $0.20 $0.22 $O.ll $0.26 $o.3z $0.26 $o.18 $0.17 $0.04 $0.19 $0.16 $0.17 $0.26 $0.24 $0.17 *~Licenses are based on each $100 of gross receipts of the pr&ceding year. The license basis for Builders & Developers is each $100 of gross expenditures. The basis for Wholesale Merchants is each $100 of gross purchases. No license shall be required when the computed annual license tax is less than $10.00. DOUGLAS S. FUGATE, COMMISSIONER LEONARD R. HALL, BRISTOL, BRISTOL DIS~s~'CT HORACE G. FRALIN, ROANOKE, SALEM DISTRICT THOMAS R. GLASS, LYNCHBURG, LYNCHBURG DISTRICT MORRILL M. CROWE, RICHMOND, RICHMOND DA(;TRICT WILLIAM T. RODS, YORKTOWN, SUFFOLK D.rSTPJCT DOUGLAS G. JANNEY. FREDERICKSBURG~ FREDERICK~BURG DISTRICY' RALPH A. BEETON, FALLS CHURCH, CU£PEPER D~STR./CT ROBERT S. LANDES, STAUNTON, ,~TAUNTON D[STR~CT T. RAY HASSELL, III, CHESAPEAKE, AT£ARG/~'.URBA~r CHARLES S. HOOPBR, JR., CREWE, ATLARGE-RURA£ --., oNWEALTFF OF' DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS & TRANSPORTATION 1221 EAST BROAD STREET RICHMOND, 23219 April 18, 1975 JOHN E. HARWOOD DEPUTY COMMISSIONER & CHIEF ENGINEER W. S. G. BRITTON DIRECTOR OF ADMINISTRATION H. GORDON BLUNDON DIRECTOR OF PROGRAM MANAGEMENT J. M. WRAY, JR., DtRECTOR OF OPERATIONS J. P. ROYER, JR. DIRECTOR OF PLANNING P. B. COLDIRON, DIRECTOR OF ENGINEERING IN REPLY PLEASE REFER TO Secondary System Additions Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County Chesterfield Court House, Virginia 23832 Gentlemen: As requested in resolution by your Board on February 12, 1975, the following additions to the Secondary System of Chesterfield County are hereby approved, effective May 1, 1975. .ADDITION SHENANDOAH SUBDIVISION SECTION "E" LENGTH Tuxford Road - Beginning at a point 0.02 mile east of its intersection with Aldersmead Road westerly 0.02 mile to its intersection with Aldersmead Road, thence westerly 0.20 mile to Arkwright Road, thence westerly 0.04 mile to a temporary cul-de-sac. 0.26 Mi. Aldersmead Court -.Beginning at its intersection with Aldersmead Road westerly 0.07 mile to a cul-de-sac. 0.07 Mi. Copies: Mr. A. S. Mattox Mr. J. P. Mills, Jr. Mr. A. S. Brown Mr. L. E. Brett, Jr. Mr. L. H. Dawson, Jr. Mr. E. L. Covington, Jr. - Chesterfield A HIGHWAY IS AS SAFE AS THE USER MAKES IT BOARD OF SUPERVISORS IRVING. HORNER, C#AIRNA# CLOVER #II, L DISTRICT LEO MYERS, vice C#,~IR.AN BERMUDA DISTRI~ COUNTY OF CH C'HESTERFIELD. M. W, BURNETT COUNTY AD~I! N ISTRATOR ESTER VIRGINIA BOARD OF SUPERVISORS J. RUFFiN APPERSON DALE DISTRICT ALDRICH J~ KREPELA ~41DLOTHIAK DISTRICT E. MERLIN O'NEILL, SR. UATOACA DISTRICT FIELD March 6, 1975 ~. Tom Page, Manager Chesterfield County Airport Chesterfield, VA RE: Indemnification by Contractor and Auto Rental Lease Dea~ Tom: I am returning herewith the lease and indemnification agree- ment refe~ed to above, as I believe the~e to be in good form. I had been under the impression you were coming by to pick these pap~s up, b~ since you have not, I take this means to send them on to you. Very truly yours, Mo~t~ ~. Mason County Attorney MEM: mjm En clos ~re LEASE THiS LEASE, made and entered in'to as of the 1st day of July , 1974, by and between the COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD, ~. · ~ ~o,~~ SALES, VTRGTx~T~ hmreinafter referred to as "LESSOR",&. HEARSE & INC., a corporation organized and existing under the laws 0-5 the State of Virginia, hereinafter called "LESSEE"; WZTNESSETH: WH[R~AS~ Lessor owns and operates the Chesterfield County Airport located in Ckesterfield~ Virginia, hereinafter called TO~ ~ - ' - 'the A .... O~T, and- ~fHEREAS, automobile rental service at the Airport is de- sirable for the proper accommoda{ion of passengers arriving at and departing from the Airport; and I~EP~EAS, the Lessor desires to enter into an agreement where- by the Lessee, a qualified operator of an automobile rental service ready and able to perform or see to the performance of said services at the Airport, will furnish or see to the fur~ishing of facilities for use in connection with an automobile rental service and will operate such service. '-~.~, THEREFORE, the parties ' =a,~reto, for and. in consideration of ~%~ reserved and ~ho covenants and agreements contained herein, agree as follows: i. PREb!ISES AND LICENSES= Lessor does hereby demise and let untc the Lessee, and the Lessee does hereby hire and t'ak~ from ~ke Lessor, subject to the terms and conditions hereinafter ztateg, the following premises and facilities, rights, licenses and privileges on and in connection with the property and improve- ments of the Lessor~ known as the Chesterfield County Airport, Federal, State, or Municipal sales or similar taxes, separately s~ated and collected from customers of Lessee, no~ or hereafter levied or imposed; and shall not include any sums received from insurance or other~ise for damage to automobiles.or other property of Lessee or for loss, conversion or abandon- ment of such automobiles; and shall not include any amount paid by customers of Lessee separately billed and stated in car rental contracts as additional charges for ~aiver by Lessee of its rights to recover'damages from customers for damage to the vehicle rented. Deduction shall be made from gross revenues. ' for-uncollected accounts. The term "gross revenue" shall include paid receipts from rent-a-car service originating directly or indirectly from the Chesterfield County Airport, but shall not' include receipts for car rental service otherwise provided by Lessee. (d) Place of Paymen~t. Alt sums due hereunder and the report of gross revenues mentioned in (c) hereof shall be paid or made'.by delivery to Lessor's Airpor~ Manager at his offi'ce at the Airport. Reports of gross revenue shall be in such detail as the Lessor shall reasonably require. S. RIGHFS AND PRIVILEGES OF LESSEE° During the term hereof Lessee shall haYe the righ~ and Lessor hereby gives and grants to the Lessee the fotlo~ving rights and privileges- (a) Si~n~ The righ~ at Lessee's own expense to install and thereafter to operate, and maintain signs, conforming to the general decorative scheme of the Terminal Building, advertising Lessee's business on the premises leased to the Lessee here- under, and at such other place or places in or upon the Airport as may be mutually agreed upon by the parties hereto. year to dispose of automobiles becoming obsolete under the u~-~ltion h~ein contained. (h) Rules and Re&ulations. That it will, at its ~ ~ perform and abide by all regulations, rules own ~xpenses, ke~, or ordinances now in effect or hereafter adopted by the Lessor for ~ ~e operation and management of the Chesterfield County Airport. (a) The Lessee shall keep and hold harmless the Le~=o om and agaznst any and all claims, demands, suits', ~udgments costs and expenses asserted by any person or parsons, mnc!uding agents or employees of the Lessor or the Lessee,~by reason of death or injury to persons or loss or damage to proper~y, resulting from Lessee's operations hereunmer, or sustained in or upon the leased premises or as the result of anything claimed to be done or omitted to be done by Lessee kereunder. (b) _[The Lessee shall, without cost to the Lessor, oo~==n and maintain during the term hereof, automobile public z~s=~aY insurance providing against loss or damage to persons or ~rcaercy from the operation of automobiles hereunder, with z==s~±~-~ limits of ~300.,000/~500,000 for personal injuries to ~'~ ds .... ~ to:an~ one person in any one accident, and $25,000 for dzn~ or property, or as required by the Virginia Department cf '/~-~r Vehicles go~erning operation of vehicles for hire. (c) Lessee shall provide copies of certificates, duly ~ ~ ...... y agenc, evidencing all such insurances to the Lessor. z ~=~.cmobiles comprising said fleet are separately insured ag~+ public liability and property damage in the }imits herein as more particularly hereinafter set forth: (a) Two spaces located at or near the Airport Terminal Building for rental car parking, the said space being more particul.arty described and set out in Exhibit "A" hereto attached . and made a part hereof. The Lessor reserves the right,-if in its opinion it should be necessary or desirable, to ch.ange the location of the exclusive space herein granted, provided such change shall not decrease the area of such space~ (b) Space for parking and keeping additional rental cars-in the general area of the Airport Terminal, the specific .... . .1. ea~zon or.said space to be designated from time to ti~e'by the County Airp6rt Manager as and When additional space is deemed necessary by Lessee to meet public demand for car rental services. (c) Upon completion of the Airport Terminal Building, Lessee shall have the right to office and/or counter~space in said terminal building. The terms and conditions of such~ rental space, shall be as~agreed to by the parties and' made a part of · ~ ~. -_ this~-lease. · commencing on the on the 1st day of as herein provided. TER~[o The term of this Lease shall be for one (1) year, 1st day of July , 1974, and ending July , 1975, unless other~ise terminated 3. USE OF DEMISED PREMISES~ The premises described here- in shall be used by the Lessee for the purpose of providing automobile rental service at the Airport and for the purpose of arranging for such services for passengers and the general public using the Airport, at destinations where automobile rental service is furnished by the Lessee or by other licenseeg of Lessee's licensor. The Lessor hereby grants to Lessee, subject to the terms and conditions hereinafter contained, the right to conduct and operate an automobile rental concession at the Airport for the purposes aforesaid. This concession shall not be construed to be an exclusive concession and the Lessor shall have the right to deal with and perfect arrangements with any otker individual, firm or corporation for engaging in like activities at the Airport or if service provided is not adequate at the end of the contractual period° RENT. (a) Lessee agrees to pay to Lessor as rental for the parking spaces leased to it hereunder and for the rights and privilege= herein granted by the Lessor for the term herein- before set out the sum of Ten Dollars ($10.00) per year for 12~ce~s~ry auto. , z ~ moo_,~e parking space, plus excess rent equal to ten per cent (10%} of all collectable gross receipts~ as herein defined, for each and every length of the term of this Lease _-~ ~r~. -~ ~ ~ ~?nq- (b) Time of Payment° The first payment of rent shall be made pursuant to this Lease Agreement. At the end of the !st quarter of operation after the beginning of lease period an~ end of each quarter,thereafter, the Lessee shall furnish to ~he Lessor a report of Lessee's gross r~enu~ for each'quarter ~ ..... imultaneously pay to the Lessor the minimum'quarterly rental kerein spec ~ed~ for the current quarter. (c) Gross Revenues~ The term "gross revenue" used herein shall mean all the time, trip, mileage, and all other charges (except those specifically herein execpted) from or ~n cennection with the rental or delivery of automobiles by r~-== hereunder, but shall not include the amount of any The lessor, ho~.Tever, retains the right' (1) to approve 'the type and location of signs to be installed~ erected or maintained. (2) to remove, if Lessee fails to do so promptly upon written notice, any signs installed without the approval of Lessor or not maintained in accordance with Lessor's requirements. (b) .Riykt of Removal° The right before or upon termination Of ~' '- -- Ln~ agreement to promptly remove such items as may have been installed in or upon the premises at the Air- port by the Lessee,_ pursuant to paragraph (a) hereof. (c) Use of Roads and Drives. The right to use in co,non with others of Airport ~oads and driveways necessary in the conduct, operation and maintenance of Lessee's concession hereunder. 6o OBLIGATIO>TS OF LES~EEo (a) Payment of Rent. To promptly pay the rent when d"e ~ oth=r ~ =-~-~ ~- obiiga~ions reserved in paragraph 4 hereof. (b) ?ayment of Expenses. That it will meet all ex- penses in connection w~h the use of the leased premises here- unger and the rights and privileges herein granted, including withou~ limitation by reason of emu ~'~ ~'~ taxes perm~ t ..... , ±zcense fees and assessments lawfully levied or assessed ~ ~ ~_e premises or structures and mmprovements at any. time situated thereon, erected by it, and that it w-ill secure ali such permits and licenses° (c) Records and Reports° That it will keep or cause to be kept true, accurate and complete records of business con- aucued hereunder, in such detail as the Lessor shall, specify and The Lessee covenants and agrees: -S- require for verification of the reports required t~y paragraph 4 (b) hereof; and the Lessee further agrees that the Lessor shall have the right, through its agents and representatives, to examine all pertinent records at any and all reasonable times for the purpose of determining the accuracy thereof and of the reports required to be made by Lessee pursuant to paragraph 4 (b) hereof. The Lessee further agrees to furnish to the Lessor not later ~han ninety days (90) after the end of each of Lessee's fiscal years, a statement by a public accountant of the gross receipts of the Lessee from business originating at the Chesterfield County. Airport. Lessor will not divulge confidential information about Lessee's business ~ithou~ prior written approval of Lessee. (d) ~Feeso Lessee co~enants that it ~'ill keep_posted ~zith the Lessor and maintain a full schedule of rental fees and charges made by it for automobile rental services and that it ~zill not amend or ~ary the said schedule so posted with the Lessor ~ithout notifying the Lessor in ~riting. ..-- (e) Fleet. The Lessee s]~ali, - ~ as far as possible, at all times attempt to have available for use by its customers at the Airport a sufficient number of passenger automobiles to supply ~ t._e normal demands of the public for automobile rental. (f) Maintenance. Lessee ~,~'itl furnish good, pror~pt, and efficient ~ser~ice, adequate to ~eet all reasonable demands upon it at the Airport, and it ~vill make available, at its sole expense, rental automobiles in good order, free from know~n mech~anica! defects in a clean, , neat and attractive condition, inside and out. All au~omobmles maintained in the rental fleet shall be current models or prior models which have been available for not-more than t~o (2) years, provided the Lessee may have until May. 1st in each prescribed, u, a presentation and evidence of such fact to the Lessor~ additional public liability insurance shall be waived. Said policy (s) and/or certificate (s) shall be delivered to the Lessor ten (10) days in advance of the effective date thereof. : 8. DEFAULTS. In the event the Lessee shall default in the payment of any sums ~¢hen due hereunder, and such default shall continue for ten Il0) days, or Lessee shall default in the performance of.any other covenants required to be kept by Lessee hereunder and Lessee fails to correct such default within--.fortyr.eight (48) hours after notice thereof from ~L~S'sor to lessee, or if Lessee shall make an assignmen-t for the benefit of creditors or be adjudged a bankrupt, Lessor shall have the right to immediately terminate this agreement, and in the event of such termination Lessee shall have no further rights hereunder and shall thereupon remove from said premises and shall have no further rights or claims thereto, or Lessor may at its discretion correct any such fault ~and ~ Lessee- agrees tO ~raimburse Lessor for any cost incurred by Lessor in so doing. Any forbearance by Lessor of any condition or requirement of this Lease shall not be deemed a ~ai~er'of S a~e. 9~ N=GOTIA~T_ON FOR RENE~.VALo Notwithstanding any other pro¥ision of this agreement, the Lessor reserves the rig~, in its discretion and after conference with the Lessee, if service is not adequate at the Airport, to cancel this agree- ment and terminate the operation of the Lessee at the Airport. The Lessor and Lessee mutually agree, that 60 days prior-to the end term, or any extended term, if this agreement is then -8- in effect, they will enter into negotiations for a renewal or extension of the term herein granted for an additional period of tine. i0. GOVERNMENTAL CONTROL. In the event that the United States Government or _any of its agencies shall occupy the Airport or any substantial part thereof to such an extent as to materially interfere with the Lessee's operations, or in the event of destruction by fire or other cause of ail or a material portion of the Airport or Airport facilities, or if Lesseets operations shall for any reason, through fault of the _ Lessor, be materially interfered-with for a period in excess of fi-~+ .-~ee2 (15) days, then and in any of these events either t-he Lessor or the Lessee shall have 'the right, upon written notice to the +' O~fl~, to ~-~' - c~-.::~inate this agreement and further obligations hereunder o 11. SUBLETTING. The leased premises may not be sublet, in whole or in part, and Lessee shall not assign this assignment ~ prior writ-ten consent of the Lessor, nor permit any zransfer by operation of law of Lessee's interest created hereby o ..... than by merger or consolidation. !2.~NOTICES. , CONSENTS AND APPROVALS. All notices, consents and app~o~als required or authorized by this ~greement knd Lease to :'~.- ~=~-e~ by or on behalf of either party to the other; shall be in ~riting and signed by a duly designated representative of the party by or on whose behalf they are given. Until further notice to the Lessee, the Lessor hereby designates its Airport Manager as its representative to sign such r~otices, consents and approvals on its behalf and until further notice to the Lessor, the Lessee hereby designates as its authorized representative to sign such notices, consents and approvals on its behalf. Notices to the Lessor shall be addressed to it and delivered at the Office of the Chesterfield County Airport either by hand or registered mail, postage prepaid, or at such other place or places as it may hereafter designate by notice to the Lessee in writing. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this ins~:rument to be executed by their duly authorized officers, - --:' .... in d-upticate, ax of the day and year first above written LESSOR' COUNTy/q~)F CHESTERFIeLd, VA . !/ . Attest: .Secretary LESSEE · H~ARoE & A~IBULANCE SALES, INC. ~ Pr~"s ident Attest- - -Sec~'etar? ~/ FRED G. POLLARD CI4AIRMAN JOHN M. RASNICK, JR. Go OF COMPENSATION BOARD P. O. BOX 1177 RICHMOND, VIRGINIA 23209 April 17,1975 INIA. JOSEPH S. JAMES W. H. FORST 23832 Dtlr Hr. Thio vii1 confirm the action taken by the Ceupenoation Board aC its meeting held on April 15, nC vhich ueeCinS you veto pFeaenc and diaeuoaed your lectors of Hatch 13 and ~8, 197§, in vhi~h you requested six addicbnal dei~cies. ~a~ app~v~ ~e ~ltt~l ~8tCtone at an a~l race of $7,0~ ~ch, e~lve aa of ~ce of ~b~nC, ac Chi~ cia a~ agreed Co conal~ C~ mt~er furCher h your ~get for l~ mia underaCood Chat rich Che three new ~oitions, ~ ~uld ~ able Co hire ~ m c~rC~ de.cica ~0 ~r~sfer e~ mn ~c of C~ JeLl ~ be in c~rge of courC~ de. Cleo a~ he ~uld ~FFy over his prem~ uh~, a~ hire one n~ Jailor. Vet7 italy yours, Fred G. Follard, Cbainmm Ixeeuti~e Secretary JJfLlr. ~1 C¢: Soard of Superviooro JOHN H, THOMAS judge To: M. W. Burnett From: P. M. O'Hare The Chesterfield Detention Home would like to purchase and have installed a smoke detection and alarm system for the boys' and girls' sleeping areas. The need for this system was brought to our attention by a safety engineer and the Chesterfield County Fire Marshal. They consented to examine our building for possible hazard and fire risks. From the inspection and planning, safety programs and fire evacuation plans were to result. It was brought to our attention about the possibility of smoke coming from one of the rooms, being pumped into the duct system and then pumped into the other sleeping rooms. Smoke would not necessarily be seen in the halls; there- fore, the staff would not be alerted. The smoke detectors would be placed in the duct systems in the boys' and girls' sleeping areas. In case of smoke this would set off an alarm and alert the staff members, who could then release the children immediately from their rooms. All precautions have been taken to prevent fire. However, the type of child that we often house is capable of destructive acts that could include arson. The smoke detection device would provide us with a system to prevent the horrible possibility that a child could be locked in a smoke filled room with no means of release. This warning system would allow my staff the necessary time to remove the children from their rooms and insure their safety. This system will cost $1,100.00 installed. I respectfully request permission to install this system. PMO'H:rbr James R. tYewell Company ~. o. Box 2972, Richmond, Virginia, 23235 (703) 272-6653 April 14, 1975 Captain Dennis Turlington Fire Prevention Bureau Chesterfield, Virginia 23832 Subject: Smoke Detection System Juvenile Detention Home Chesterfield County, Virginia Dear Captain~urlington: I am pleased to submit the following proposal for your consideration. To furnish and install the following equipment: System A 2 Pyrotronic's CDA Ionization duct type detectors with provision to shut down air handling unit. 2 Remote lamp annunciators to anmunciate fire alarm. Ail for the sum of One Thousand Bight Dollars ($1,080.00). As an alternate (same price) we propose to furnish the following: System B 2 Pyrotronic's CRF Control Panels with provision to shut down Air Handling Units. 7 DI-7 Ionization Detectors 2 Remote lamp annunciator to Annunciate fire alarm. System to be installed to the complete satisfaction of the Chesterfield County Fire Department. Thank you for this opportunity to be of service. Very truly yours; ~IES R. NE~LL COMPANY ~///~./' James R. Newell JRN;lb . .CU.3 / ._ ys'3/ Blair Building 8007 Discovery Drive Box K-176 Richmond, Virginia ~288 TO: SUBJECT: COMMONWEALTH o/VIRC IN][A DEPARTMENT OF WELFARE April 7, 1975 Chairmen of County Boards of Supervisors Mayors of Cities CHILD ABUSE AND NEGLECT LEGISLATION William L ~.ukhard Commissioner Robert L. Masden Deputy Commissioner On Wednesday, March 19, 1975, Governor Godwin signed into law the Amendment in the Nature of a Substitute for House Bill No. 416, commonly known as the Child Abuse and Neglect Bill. This law, to become effective July 1~ 1975, ~..~_laqe primary responsibility for child abuse and neglect activities ~ith the S~.ate Department of Welfare and each local department of public welfare. Enclosed you will find a summary of the major provisions of the new law. They include many additional and expanded child protective services respon- sibilities for local departments of public welfare, such as "the capability of receiving reports or complaints and responding to them promptly on a twenty-four hour a day, seven days per week basis." In conjunction with this capability, local departments will be required to make immediate inves- tigation of all reports and complaints and, "when abuse or neglect is found~ arrange for necessary protective and rehabilitative services to be pro¥ided to the child and his family." The newness of the law and the date of signing by the Governor did not allow the local departments of public welfare to make adequate provision for their expanded child protective services responsibilities in their budget requests. The General Assembly in its Appropriation Act did provide funds to be uti- lized in reimbursing costs at the rate of 80% for providing the necessary services required to implement this legislation. In view of the high public concern about child abuse and neglect and the mandate of the General Assembly of Virginia, the Department of Welfare considers this program to be one of the top priorities for the State and local departments of public welfare. Therefore, your support in providing a supplemental appropriation, jf needed, to furnish adequate funding in order to insure that ~oals and pbjectives of this program can be accomplished will be appreciated. Copy: City Managers County Executives/Administrators Welfare Superintendents/Directors DEPARTMENT OF WELFARE SUMMARY OF MAJOR PROVISIONS OF NEW CHILD ABUSE AND NEGLECT STATUTES CHAPTER 12.1 OF TITLE 63.1 Reporting Provisions 1. An abused or neglected child includes children up to the age of 18. 2. The definition of abuse includes physical or mental injury, neglect, abandonment and sexual abuse. Ail physicians, nurses, social workers, probation officers, teachers (public and private), mental health professionals and law enforce- ment officers are required to report all suspected cases to the local department of public welfare. Any professional failing to report is subject to a fine. 4. Any other person suspecting child abuse or neglect may make a com- plaint to the local department of public welfare. Persons reporting a suspected case or making a complaint are immune from any civil or criminal liability unless one does so with mali- cious intent. B. Responsibilities of Local Departments of Public Welfare 1o Establish child protective services under a departmental coordinator (who may be shared with adjacent departments). 2. Receive reports and complaints on a "twenty-four hours a day, seven days per week basis." 3. Widely publicize a telephone number for receiving reports and com- plaints. Investigate all reports and complaints and transmit information to the central registry for all reports and those complaints that reveal cause to suspect abuse or neglect. Arrange for necessary protective and rehabilitative services to be provided to the child and his family. Report to the Commonwealth's Attorney all cases involving death and injury to the child such that the suspected felony carries a penalty not less than five years imprisonment. 0 Send follow-up reports and a final determination to the central registry within 14 and 45 days, respectively. Foster the "creation, maintenance, and coordination of hospital and community based multi-discipline teams." 9. Report annually on its child abuse and neglect activities. -2- ~esponsibilities of the State Board of Welfare 1. Prescribe reporting form for local welfare department coordinator. 2. Determine reporting interval after initial follow-up report of 14 days. 3. Determine local office staffing and qualifications for personnel. 4. Develop annual report forms. 5. Establish regulations for operation of child protective service unit in the department with the following powers and duties: a. To evaluate and strengthen all local, regional and State pro- grams dealing with child abuse and neglect. To assume primary responsibility for directing the planning and funding of child protective services. This shall include review- ing and approving the annual proposed plans and budgets for pro- tective services submitted by the local departments. c. To assist in developing programs aimed at discovering and pre- venting the many factors causing child abuse and neglect. d. To prepare and disseminate, including the presentation of, educational programs and materials on child abuse and neglect. e. To provide educational programs for professionals required by law to make reports under this chapter. f. Establish standards of training and provide educational programs to qualify workers in the field of child protective services. Help coordinate child protective services at the State, regional and local levels with the efforts of other State and voluntary social, medical and legal agencies. bm Prepare an annual report to be submitted to the Commissioner of Public Welfare and the Governor. This report shall include a compilation of data from the central registry and will inte- grate the reports of the local departments. i. Maintain a central State registry of all reports of child abuse and neglect within the Commonwealth. To provide methods to preserve the confidentiality of all records in order to protect the rights of the child, his parents or guardian. Administrative Release - 3 - April 1, 1975 m The Central Registry shall contain such information as shall be prescribed by Department regulation. The information contained in the central registry shall not be open to inspection by the public; however, appropriate disclosure may be made in accordance with department regulations. D. Advisory Committee An Advisory Committee composed of seven Department heads (or their desig- nees) and seven:persons appointed by the Governor shall meet quarterly to advise the Department, the Board, and the Governor on child abuse and neglect matters. BOARD OF SUPERVISORS IRVING. HORNER, CLOVER HILL DISTRICT LEO MYERS, vici CHAIRMAN BERMU DA DISTRICT BOARD OF SUPERVISORS J. RUFFIN APPERSON DALE DISTRICT ALORICH J. KREPELA MiDLOTHIAN DISTRICT E. MERLIN O'NEILL, SR. MATOACA DISTRICT COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD ESTERFIELD, M. W. BARNETT COUNTY ADL4 [ N IS TRATOR VIRGINIA April 2, 1975 Mr. M. W. Burnett County Administrator Chesterfield Courthouse Chesterfield, VA 23832 Dear Mr. Burnett: As per your request I would like to present the following information on a front loading compactor and dumpsters. Our present contractor, Pryor's Court Refuse Service, is servicing fifty-three (53) four (4) cubic yard containers twice a week, two (2) six (6) cubic yard containers once a week, one (1) five (5) cubic yard container and one (1) three (3) cubic yard container once a week. The cost to the County for this service is $2393.00 per month less terms of twenty (20%) percent ten (10) days or $1914.40 per month if the discount is taken. It is estimated that a new thirty-two (32) cubic yard qompactor would cost approximately $40,000. I would recommend this unit be diesel powered because of fuel and maintenance costs. Ail Hydraulics should be live for speed of operation. There are two possible alternatives in so far as dumpsters are concerned. In talking with Mr. Pryor, he has quoted an estimated rental of $300.00 per month for the use of the fifty-seven (57) dumpsters we are now using. Assuming it is the intent of the County to place twenty-five (25) dumpsters in various locations as well as one at each park location. I would estimate an additional monthly charge of $160.00 or a total of $460.00. If it is decided to purchase dumpsters the initial cost would be approximately $26,000, based on eighty-seven (87) dumpsters at $300.00 each. If purchase is decided I would recommend buying an additional five (5) dumpsters and establish- ing a cleaning station for periodical cleaning. The use of a pick-up truck will also be necessary for the possible relocation of dumpsters. -2- The initial costs to implement this system with County owned equipment and an operator would be approximately $73,500.00. Initial costs of the system using rented dumpsters would be approximately $52,OOO.OO. The above information is presented for your review, I remain Sincerely yours, M. F. Woodfin Director of General Services MFW/j lb cc: C.G. Manuel January 28, 1975 Mr. Melvin W. Burnett Administrator County of Chesterfield Chesterfield, Virginia 23832 Dear Mr. Burnett: President Ford recently signed the National Health Planning and Resources Development Act of 1974 which will result in some changes in the funding of the Capital Area Comprehensive Health Planning Council, Inc. Since it may be necessary to operate through all of this year under the old funding mechanism, we are requesting that each unit of local government in our service area give consideration to funding our Agency in your 1975-76 budget. Despite the inflationary era that we are in, we are not increasing our per capita request ($. 05) from last year. Based on a population figure of 90, 400, provided by the Richmond Regional Planning District Commission, we respectfully request that you consider an appropriation of $4, 520 in your 1975-76 budget. If, prior to July 1, 1975, we find that we do not need as much local funding as we are budgeting for, we will notify you. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, MRB: dh CC' ttista Local government representative MEMORANDUM April 11, 1975 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: Mr. M. W. Burnett, County Administrator Michael C. Ritz, ctor of Planning Zoning matters for Board consideration I have two items which I would like the Board to consider. Rather than bring individual requests for waiver of fees for Mobile home Permits, I would like to request the Board of Supervisors to authorize me to waive the fees administratively when recommended to do so by the Department of Social Services. I will take this to the Board for their consideration. Prior to July 1, 1974 the State law on notification for public hearings of zoning applications permitted the Board of Supervisors to consider on the ~econd Wednesday of every month the zoning appli- cations heard by the Planning Commission on the third Tuesday of the preceeding month. As you remember the 1974 General Assembly changed that notification requirement and, therefore, in June, 1974, the Board of Supervisors agreed to he,ar zoning applications on the fourth Wednesday. The 1975 General Assembly has again revised the notifi- cation requirements so that the Board of Supervisors could return to their previous procedure of hearing zoning applications on the second Wednesday. If the Supervisors desire to change back to the second Wednesday, I need to have adequate notice to change these dates, so if theBoard would like to change the zoning hearings back to the second Wednesday meeting beginning July, I need to know by middle or late May. A dlo th ! mn,~e., ~C113 · eax~ of 3~per~iso~e ~eatePfield ~o~nty ~ester~iel~, ~a. t In regar~ te the pz~poae~ libz,a~j faeility fo~ Mi~lothla~ X ~eoommend the following atepe ~e a~epte~l X. Aooept the ~a_rae~ 9ffeP of land on 0oalftel~ P~ad. 2. ~Itabliah a apeelal tmlt ~aad fop the pu~poae of aoc~umlati~g money fop the eonltx~otion of ~nc~ ltbrariea plated at the time the libx~a.~ ~om~ iamae was voted upon. 4. Eeeea~age Pcsidenta c~e:~ .~. Mi~lothiaa Distriot t~ ,Aae the ~on Ai~ ~i~mar,/ ~Jatil the Mi~lothtlua ~l~ Iz ~empleted on 0oal~i eld 5. ~pe~ ~e money oa ~ental spaoe fop lib=aPiea. 104.0 105.0 109.0 119.0 152.0 200.0 206.0 207.0 210.0 214.0 214.1 215.0 215.1 217.0 218.0 220.0 223.0 226.0 251.0 293.0 294.0 295.0 295.1 296.0 306.0 315.0 319.0 319.t 320.2 403.0 405.0 Proposed Library, Branch Asst. Librarian Clerical Janitor Service Pages Advertising Subscriptions Electric Current Fire Insurance Rent Rental btachines Repairs & biaint. Bldgs. ~ Ground Telephone Postage Travel Purchase Water Sewage [reatnent Data Processing }~spitalization Fica Retirement County Retirenent Group Insurance £1eaning Supplies Books County Office Supplies Library Supplies Non-Book ~l~terials Furniture ~ Fixtures New'O£fice Equipment ~idlothian 15,552 10, $68 5,232 .3,000 4, $68 50 500 6,000 300 20,140 1,120 7OO 1,200 60O 100 100 100 I, 000 200 2,253 85O 200 60 200 45,000 7OO ~00 10,280 1 $13'4; '050 0't3 1975/76 Ft ESOLU T I ON WHEREAS, the goals, objectives and purposes of the Friends of the Ohesterfteld County Public Library are to organize and maintain an association of people Interested in the progress and welfare of the Chesterfield County Public Library; and WHD~EAS, the goals, objectives and purposes of the Friends of the Chesterfield County Public Library are to promote the improvement of the facilities and services of the library so as to Increase its value to the community; and WHEREAS, the Friends of the Chesterfield County Public Library initiated, endorsed, encouraged, promoted and worked'for the passage of the 1972, 1.75 million collar bono referendum for neighborhood libraries for Chesterfield County; and WHEREAS, the 1972 bond referendum for a county wide neighborhood library system for Chesterfield clearly listed priority sites in Bon Air, Matoaca, Ettrick, Mioiothian and Clover Hi I! as well as a headquarters butlding at the Courthouse, expansion of the Chester branch, and additional bookmobile service; and WHEAEA8, preliminary designs for these buildings were in progress at the time of the public's endorsement of the bond referendum; and WHEREAS, the promise was made of land acquisition and detailed designs as soon as the voters approved the referendum; and WHEREAS, the voters endorsed such a plan at the polling place showing good faith in the Chesterfield County Library Board and :the Director and their intention and ability to carry out the commitment made by the voters of Chesterfield County NOW, THEREFUh~E, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Friends of the Chesterfield County Public Library, 34'months later, do hereby express their Oissatlsfaction, disappointment and despair with the handling of the Bond Referendum funds, specifically the undue delay and vacillation in securing sites for Bon Air, Clover Hill and Courthouse and the possible loss of one whole facility (Mtdlothian) cue to rising land and building costs during the period of indecision; and BE ]:T FURTHER RESOLVED, that the above resolution be communicated to the Chesterfield County Library Board of Directors, the Director of the Chesterfield County Public Library and the Chesterfield County Board of Super vi sor s. Passed this 14th day of April, 1975. ecr e~;~r y, ~r~ends cT the Chesterfield County Public Library O~ o 0 0 0 u~ 0 EXHIBIT A-1 RICHMOND METROPOLITAN AUTHORITY CONSTRUCTION COSTS MONTH OF MARCH AND ACCUMULATED THROUGH MARCH 31, 1975 Grading and Earthwork Drainage and Slope Protection Pavement, Subbase and Shoulders Structures Roadway Protective Devices Toll Collection Facilities Other Construction Items Right of Way Engineering Maintenance & Office Equipment General Administration Legal Services Right of Way Administration Advertising & Publicity Financial Construction in Progress Preliminary Expense - City of Richmond MARCH $ 96,482. 5,345. 88,029. 74. 9,942. 2,936. 200. (119,560.) 1~ 606,677. 1,690,125. TOTAL TO DATE $ 3,918,348. 1,918,279. ~2,033,671. 8,522,921. 974,144. 899,461. 1,484,556. 19,661,959. 8,286,935. 29,687. 675,798. 359,325. 91,405. 11,215. 8,097,914. 21~711~889. 78,677,507. 216~383. $ 78,893,890. RICHMOND METROPOLITAN AUTHORITY SCHEDULE OF cONSTRUCTION COSTS THROUGH MARCH 31, 1975 SCHEDULE 1 GRADING AND EARTHWORK DRAINAGE AND SLOPE PROTECTION PAVEMENT, SUBBASE AND SHOULDERS STRUCTURES ROADWAY PROTECTIVE DEVICES TOLL COLLECTION FACILITIES OTHER CONSTRUCTION ITEMS Borings Liquidated Damages Utility Relocations New Utility Construction Maintenance of Traffic & Detours Landscaping Miscellaneous & Force Account Work Damage to Property of Others Railroad Relocations Bridge Demolition RIGHT OF WAY Appraisals, Negotiations & Legal Appraisals, Negotiations - Condemnations Title Search & Abstracting Court Costs Moving Costs Relocation Services Protection of Property Cost of Land - Direct Purchase Cost of Land - Permanent Easements Cost of Land - Temporary Easements Sale of Land to Commonwealth of Va. Cost of Land - Condemnations Demolition Sale of Property MARCH , 96,482. 96,482. $ 3,451. 50. 91. 1,274. 968. 27. TOTAL TO DATE 3,918,348. 1,918,279. 2,033,671. 8,522,921. 974,144. 899,461. $ 191,739. (2,600. 328,060. 608,748. 29,760. 50. 124,225. 16,583. 159,991. 28,000. $ 712,067. 1,645. 191,550. 18,733. 232,437. 28,665. 90,900. 20,274,989. 2,150. 28,545. (1,907,778.) 180,899. 600,444. (555,611.) Continued RIGHT OF WAY (Continued) Rental of Property Real Estate Taxes -2- ENGINEERING General Consultant Aerial Surveys Contract Advertising Traffic Engineering Technical Inspections - Construction Miscellaneous Engineering MAINTENANCE & OFFICE EQUIPMENT Office Equipment Automotive Equipment GENERAL ADMINISTRATION Personal Services - Employees Personal Services - Others Social Security Taxes Employers Contribution - Retirement Employers Contribution - Life Insurance Disability Insurance Hospitalization Insurance Advertisements Telephone & Telegraph Postage Freight, ExPress & Cartage Printing & Binding Photographic & Blueprints Repairs & Maintenance - Equipment Travel Expenses - Employees Travel Expenses - Others Highway Construction Supplies Automotive Maintenance - Materials & Supplies Motor Fuels & Lubricants Educational, Medical, Scientific Supplies Administrative Materials & Supplies Insurance & Surety Bonds Rental of Building & Equipment SCHEDULE 1 MARCH 31~ 1975 $ (516.) ,,$,, 5,345, $ (239,638.) 1,962. .~19, 661, 959. $ 88,029. 88,029. 7,740,062. 110,872. 9,9661 275,129. 144,721. 6,185. 8,286,935. $ 74. 74. 16,597. 13,090. 29,687.. 8,806. 275. 515. 171. 23. 93. 225. 100. 40. 1,699. 68. 54. 516,362. 37,864. 16,099. 11,921. 1,391. 11,809. 2,429. 3,418. 21,000. 4,737. 58. 6,826. 47,230. 2,788. 27,122. 2,119. 206. 20. 1,140. 1,060. 1,276. 1,612. 2. 7,560. 109,638. 74,916. Continued GENERAL ADMINISTRATION (Continued) Other Charges & Obligations Interest Earned Administrative Credits -3- LEGAL Legal Services RIGHT OF WAY ADMINISTRATION .Personal Service - Employees Personal Service - Others Social Security Taxes Employers Contribution - Retirement Employers Contribution - Life Insurance Postage Printing & Binding Photographic & Blueprints Administrative Materials & Supplies Insurance & Surety Bonds Rental of Building & Equipment Other Charges & Obligations ADVERTISING & PUBLICITY Advertisements Public Relation Advisors Photographic & Blueprints FINANCIAL Bond Discount Amortization of Premiums on Investments Amortization of Discounts on Investments Interest Expense Financial Advisor Bond Counsel Trustee Fees Paying Agents Fees Printing Auditing Interest Earned Transfers to Other Funds Transfers from Other Funds Continued SCHEDULE 1 MARCH 31~ 1975 120. (4,467.) 942. 15,087. (54,172.) 193,500. ) 675,798. 2,936. 359,325. $ -0- 63,531. 2,279. 2,936. 1,208. 135. 1,114. 286. 9,320. 2,168. 165. 7,136. 1,127. 91,405. 200. 200. 2,608. 8,600. 7. 215. (119,560.) $ (119,560.) 2,191,105. 11,992. (298,320.) 15,145,629. 156,121. 121,922. 36,987. 2,736. 116,657. 24,718. (8,323,301.) 468,850. (1,557,182.) 8,097,914. -4- CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS Contract C-7 Contract C-8 Contract C-9 Contract C-10 Commonwealth of Va.: Rts. 88 & 195 Contract TF-3 Contract SL-2 PRELIMINARY EXPENSE - CITY OF RICHMOND SCHEDULE 1 MARCH 31, 1975 $ 182,576. 531,818. 480,316. 220,313. 128,972. 18,682. 44,000. $1,606,677. $ 4,155,101. 7,725,909. 6,104,255. 2,552,710. 1,006,421. 123,493. 44,000. $ 21,711,889. 216,383. ~1,690,125. $ 78,893,890. OHm ~ (~ 0 O0 O~ 0 ~ h ~ m~ ~ 0 ~ 0 o3 ~) II EXHIBIT B RICHMOND METROPOLITAN AUTHORITY STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL CONDITION SECTION ONE & BOULEVARD BRIDGE MARCH 31, 1975 ASSETS Cash Investments - Maintenance Accounts Receivable Prepaid Insurance TOTAL ASSETS $155,232. 50,000. 126. 14r906. ~220,264. LIABILITIES Accounts Payable Accrued Payroll Taxes Deferred Income: Tags & Passes Prepaid Tolls Fund Balance - Schedule 3 TOTAL LIABILITIES & FUND BALANCE $13,093. 1,613. $ 4,382. 9,155. 14,706. 192,021. ~220,264__~. II I 0 SCHEDULE 2 RICHMOND METROPOLITAN AUTHORITY OPERATING EXPENSES MONTH OF MARCH AND NINE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 1975 ADMINISTRATIVE Stationery, Printing & Supplies Miscellaneous Administrative Charge Publicity & Public Relations Insurance & Surety Bonds TOLL ACCOUNTING & AUDIT Stationery, Printing & Supplies Money Handling Services TOLL COLLECTION Personal Services - Employees Social Security Taxes Employer Contribution: State Retirement Life Insurance Hospitalization Uniforms & Personal Supplies Stationery, Printing & Supplies Telephone & Telegraph Heat, Light & Power Office Equipment Maintenance Office Equipment Building Supplies & Janitorial Services Miscellaneous Expenses Rental of Automatic Toll EquiPment Materials & Supplies Parts & Supplies - Toll Collecting EquiPment Rent - Toll Plaza Motor Vehicle Operation & Maintenance HIGHWAY LIGHTING Power Miscellaneous Materials & Supplies Contractual Services MARCH 4,467. 500. 1,319. 286. $ 196. 250. 446. $19,865. 1,162. 235. 34. 344. il. 107. 1,385. 16. 547. 5,462. 135. 190. $29,493. $ 1,410. 86. 182. 1,678. TOTAL TO DATE $ 17. 262. 40,200. 4,620. 11,611. 56,710. $ 196. 3,975. 4,171. $177,873. 10,405. 2,038. 293. 2,776. 1,774. 2,885. 871. 6,339. 16. 42. 3,028. 1,407. 48,269. 276. 48. 1,166. 2~065. $261,571. $ 4,999. 86. 244. 182. Continued TRAFFIC CONTROL Miscellaneous MAINTENANCE Roadways Miscellaneous Contractual Services Grounds & Buildings Miscellaneous Materials & Supplies Contractual Services OTHER Trustee Traffic Engineers Accounting & Audits TOTAL TO EXHIBIT B-1 -2- SCHEDULE 2 MARCH 31, 1975 53. $ 1,265. $ 62. 1,133. 1,195. 345. $ 573. 34. 157. 3,693. 502. 4,300. ~38,458. $ 5,384. 3,750. 1,805. ~ 10,939. $345,662. SCHEDULE 3 RICHMOND METROPOLITAN AUTHORITY REVENUE FUND BALANCE MARCH 31, 1975 Fund Balance - July 1, 1974 Net Revenue - Exhibit B-1 REVENUE FUND $176,774. 735t747. '$912,521. Less: Transfers to Interest Account Fund Balance - Exhibit B ~720~500. ~192,021. 0 · 0 C 0 C C 'ii hO 0 0 ~ 0 0 ~ ~-q · o~ I 0 0 ~0 o EXHIBIT D RICHMOND METROPOLITAN AUTHORITY SUBORDINATE NOTE FUND BALANCE SHEET MARCH 31, 1975 ASSETS LIABILITIES & FUND BALANCE Accrued Interest Payable (1) (2) subordinate Notes Due: 1-15-21 ~ 4.53% (3) 1-19-23 ~ 4.57% (4) 1-28-24 ~ 4.64% (3) 7-15-24 ~ 4.64% (4) Total Liabilities Fund Balance $ 502,419. 81,150. 4,604,000. 1,442,000. 2,630,417. $ 9,259,986. (9,259,986. (1) Interest accrued twice during fiscal year from: (a) July 1 to anniversary date of note on anniversary date; (b) Anniversary date of note to June 30 upon fiscal year end at June 30. (2) No interest payment required under contract with City until moneys available in Surplus Fund. (3) Issued in payment of right of way acquired from City. (4) Issued in payment of funds deposited by City to Reserve Fund. EXHIBIT E RICHMOND METROPOLITAN AUTHORITY NOTE PRINCIPAL & INTEREST FUND BALANCE SHEET MARCH 31, 1975 Assets I nye s tme nt s .~2,220,544. Fund Balance Deposit to Fund by City of Richmond Interest Earned $2,050,000. 170,544. ~2t220,544. RICHMOND METROPOLITAN AUTHORITY STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL CONDITION PARKING GARAGE REVENUE BONDS MARCH 31, 1975 Assets Cash With Trustee: Investments: Construction Fund Account Interest Account Deposit With Court - Condemnation Accumulated Construction Costs - Exhibit F-1 $1,400,000.- 116,777. Liabilities Accounts Payable Subordinate Note Due City of Richmond 12-31-14 ~ 6.25% Bonds Payable: Series of 1974 Due 7-1-14 ~ 6% EXHIBIT F $ 44,974. 1,516,777. 16,000. 645,870. ~.2,223,621. $ 14,121. 409,500. 1,800,000. $2,223,621. RICHMOND METROPOLITAN AUTHORITY PARKING GARAGE CONSTRUCTION COSTS MONTH OF MARCH AND ACCUMULATED THROUGH MARCH 31, 1975 EXHIBIT F-1 .Building & Equipment - Building Other Construction Items - Boring Right of Way: Appraisals, Negotiations & Legal Services Cost of Land Acquired by Direct Purchase Engineering - General Consultant General Administration - Insurance & Surety Bonds Legal Services Advertisements & Public Relations Financial: Interest Expense Bond Counsel Trustee Fees Printing Interest Earned Total To Exhibit F MARCH 45,142. 20,213. 1,219. (2,916.) (2,916.) TOTAL TO DATE 82,251. 2,319. 500. 409~500. 410,000. 135,000. 1,219. . 3,021. 350. 49,500. 3,878. 1,350. 96. (43,114.) 11,710. $ 63~ 658. .$ 645,870. ~~~~o~~~~ ~ ~°°°~ooooooooooooooooooo ~~0000000000000000000 O~ o~ ~0~00000000000000~0000 O~ ~0~000~0000~0~~0~0~ 0000000000000000000000000 O000000000000000000000000g 000000000000000000~0000 0 O0 O0 O00 ~ ~0000~0 ~~0~0~ ~o~ H 00000 00000 0 ~0 ~ ~ 0000' ~ 0000 0000 00~ Ob3ff~O 0 u3 0 :1 0~0 ~o~ 0 o 0 ~o oeo :ii o ~ 0 u3 I 4..I 0 · 0 0 0000 hhh~H H t~ ~4 0-~ 4J4~ I ~ 0 ~0 0 ~ pe.~,ty' : ,~ . 'C. B. Form 14 15M 1/73 ~ COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA .~ COMPENSATION BOARD RICHMONI~ INSTRUCTIONS Officers Compensated on Salary Basis-- 1. Prepare this form in trlplicate--orig!nal to accompany request filed with Compensation Board; carbon to accom- pany copy of request filed with local govermng body. 2. It is not necessary for the principal officer to prepare this form in instances where the Compensation Board is re- quested to allow a sum for temporary positions. 3. This form should be filed in alt instances where an increase in salary or new position.is requested. Officers Compensated on Fee Basis--Prepare this form in duplicate, original to accompany estimate of exI)enses filed with the Compensation Board. Also follow instructions 2 and 3. THE COMPENSATION BOARD: Request is made for the allowance of the following reased 1. Name of employee: Lona Mae Buterbauqh rate of pay effective (date) JuL I 2. Present rate of compensation 3. Proposed salary 7/1/75.-1,2/31/75 fa $5064. 4. State whether this employee v¢orks full or part time: 5. State number of hours this employee works each week: 6..Briefly describe the duties of this employee: Account Clerk II 1/1/76-6/30/76 A $5304. Full Time -40 4752. 5184. One 7. Give length of service of this employee: year a. Entrance rate of pay: b. Date and amount of last increase received: Date 12/~/74 c. If employee receives additional compensation from city or county state amount: 8. If employee is to replace another, state name and salary of, former employee: Name Amount $ 9. Give reasons for increasing salary of employee or creating new position, as the case may be: To conform to County Pay Plan. $.4158. Amount $ 240. 7/1/75 - 12/31/75 $5064. 1/1/76 - 6/30/76 5304. Tide of of~c~ COUNTY OF CHESTERFiF[ P Count,/or Clef 'Cancel whlcherer word ta ~o~ mp$~lkmb~e~ C. B. Form 1~ ISM 9/73 ~'~.OMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA ~ COMPENSATION BOARD RICHMOND INSTRUCTIONS Officers Compensated on Salary Basis-- 1. Prepare this form in triplicate--original to accompany request filed with Compensation Board; carbon to accom- pan}- copy of request filed with local governing body. 2. It is not necessary for the principal officer to prepare this form in instances where the Compensation Board is re- quested to allow a sum for temporary positions. 3. 'This form should be filed in all instances where an increase in salary or new position is requested. Officers Compensated on Fee Basis--Prepare this form in duplicate, original to accompany estimate of expenses filed with the Compensation Board. Also follow instructions 2 and 3. THE COMPENSATION BOARD: Request is made for the allowance of the following increased rate of pay effective (date) 1. Name of employee: Violet L. Clements 2. Present rate of compensation 3. Proposed salary 7/!/75-12/31/75 $8172_ 4. State whether this employee works 'full or part time: __ 5. State number of hours this employee works each week: 6, ,Briefly describe the duties of this employee: Accoun%s and Records S~p, ervisor 1/1/76-6./30/76 40 $8856 $ 8160. 8664. 7. Give length of service of this employee: F~/llr~rs a. Entrance rate of pay: b. Date and amount of last increase received: Date 1/1/75 c. If employee receives additional compensation from city or county state amount: 8, If employee is to replace another/state name and salary of former employee: Name Amount $ 9. Give reasons for increasing salary of employee or creating new posi{ion, as the case may be: To conform to County Pay Plan. $ Amount $. 2040. 924. 7/1/75 - 12/31/75 $ 8472. 1/1/76 - 6/30/76 8856. · Omcel whiche~.r wo~cl b no~ spplimbl~. COUNTY O 'd STERFIELD C. B. Form 14 ISM 9/75 COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA COMPENSATION BOARD RICHMOND INSTRUCTIONS Officers Compen~tecl on Salary Basis--- 1 Prepare this form in triplicate--original to accompany request filed with Compensation Board; carbon to accom- pan>' copy of request filed with local governing body. 2. It is not necessary for the priucipal officer to prepare this form in instances where the Compensation Board is re- quested to allow a sum for temporary positions. 3. This form should be filed in all instances where an increase in salary or new position is requested. .Officers Comp~enaated. on Fee Basis--Prepare this form in duplicate, ori~zb~l to accompany e~timate of ex?)~ses fi!e~ w~::h the Compensation B~a~-d. Also fol[0w insiructions 2 and 3. · ' ' - ' THE COMPENSATION BOARD: Request is made for the allowance of the following increased rate of pay effective (date) }1~ 1 ' ~;.75., 19__. 1. Name of employee: Grace T. Kidd 2. Present rate of compensation 3. Proposed salary 7/1/75-12/31/75 $7368. 4. State whether this employee xvorks full or part time: 5. State number of hours this employee works each week: 6. Briefly describe the duties of this employee: Account Clerk III 1/1/76-6/30/76 $7704. Full Time 4O $.7056. 7536. $. 7. Give length of service of this employee: E] oven Years a. Entrance rate of pay: b. Date and amount of last increase received: Date__ 1/1/75 c. If employee receives additional compensation from city or county state amount: 8. If employee is to replace another, state name and salary of former employee: Name Amount $ 9. Give reasons for increasing salary of employee or creating new position, as the case may be: To conform to County Pay Plan $~23 40~ Amount $ ~76.. 1/1/76 - 6/30/76 7704. S~o~v~f~ om~ .Tl:e asurez. 'C.l~cel ~hic. he,~er word ~ ~ mpl~ll~d~le. C. B. Form 1~ 1SM 9/7!1 ~ ~ COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA COMPENSATION BOARD RICHMOND INSTRUCTIONS Officers Compen~atecl on Salary Basis--- 1. Prepare this form in triplicate--original to accompany request filed with Compensation Board; carbon to a¢com- pan)- cop), of request filed with local governing body. 2. It is not necessary for the principal officer to prepare this form in instances xvhere the Compensation Board is re- quested to allow a sum for temporary positions. 3. This form should be filed in all instances where an increase in salary or new position is requested. Officers Comlaen~tedon Fee Basi~--Prepare this form in duplicate, original to accornpany estimate of expenses filed w. ith the Compensad'6fl;B'~aid. Also follow instructions 2 and 3. THE COMPENSATION BOARD: ~"if~F.~'z ][}75 Request is made for the allowance of the ionow~ng . ~ rate of pay effective (date) Helen K. Leonard 1. Name of employee: 2. Present rate of compensation 3. Proposed salary 7/1/75-12/31/75 $770/~. 4. State whether this employee works full or part time: __ 5. State number of hours this employee works each week: 6. Briefly describe the duties of this employee: Account Control Technician __1/1/76-6/30/76 $8088. Full Time 40 __$.7392. $.7896. Eleven years Amount $. 7. Give length of service of this employee: a. Entrance rate of pay: b. Date and amount of last increase received: Date. 1/1/75 c. If employee receives additional compensation from city or county state amount: 8. If employee is to replace another, state name and Salary of former employee: Name Amount $ 9. Give reasons for increasing salary of employee or creating new position, as the case may be: To conform to County Pay Plan. $ 2340. 348. 7/1/75 - 12/31/75 $ 7704. 1/1/76 - 6/30/76 8088. Trn '~ 'Cancel whlchevet word i~ no~ ~ltc~bl~. lC~ C, B. Form 1~ ISM 9/7I COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINI,~~'~ COMPENSATION BOARD RICHMOND INSTRUCTIONS Officers Compensated on Salary Basis-- 1. Prepare this form in triplicate--original to accompany request filed with Compensation Board; carbon to accom- pany copy of request filed with local governing body. . 2. It is not necessary for the principal officer to prepare this form in instances where the Compensation Board is re- quested to allow a sum for temporary positions. 8. This form should be filed in all instances xvhere an increase in salary or new position.is requested. .Officers Compensated on Fee Basis--Prepare this form in duplicate, originai to accompany estimate of expenses filed with the Compensation Board. Also follow instructions 2 and 3. THE COA'~PENSATION BOARD: ,' ....... , . Request is made for the allo~vance of the following _e~[~* ~7c increased rate of pay effective (date) 'J~?! I '- ;~t,~ _, 19 t. Name of employee: Mrs. Rosemary F. Eyler 2. Present rate of compensation 3. Proposed salary 7/1/75-1 ~/_q'l/7~ $703?. 4. State whether this employee works full or part time: __ 5. State number of hours this employee works each week: 6. Briefly describe the duties of this employee: -Account Clerk III ]/]/76-6/30/76 Vnl 1 Ti me 40 $7368. 6720. 7200. 7. Give length of service of this employee: T,_e_D__jfears a. Entrance rate of pay: b. Date and amount of last increase received: Date. J./1/75 c. If employee receives additional compensation from city or county state amount: 8. If employee is to replace another, state name and salary of former employee: Name Amount $ 9. Give reasons for increasing salary of employee or creating new position, as the case may be: To confopm to County Pay Plan. Amount $. 2580. 588. 7/1/75-12/31/75 1/1/76-6/30/76 $7032. 7368. C. B. Form 14 1SM 9/73 ~ COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA COMPENSATION BOARD RICI-IMOND INSTRUCTIONS Officers Compensated on Salary Basis--- 1. Prepare this form in triplicate--original to accompany request filed with Compensation Board; carbon to accom- pan)- copy of request filed with local governing body. 2. It is not necessary for the principal officer to prepare this form in instances where the Compensation Board is re- quested to allow a sum for temporary positions. 3. This form should be filed in all instances where an increase in salary or new position is requested. Officers Compensated on Fee Basis--Prepare this form in duplicate, original to accompany estimate of expenses filed w.ith the Compensation' BOard. Also follow instructions 2 and 3. THE COMPENSATION BOARD: ,,,' Request is made for the allowance of the f°ll°wingl~!~3~'*mcreased rate of pay effective (date) ' !/ -: ~ i~:7!; ., I9. 1. Name of employee: A. R~.e Hall 2. Present rate of compensation 3. Proposed salary 7/1/75-]~/_q1/75 $5064- 4. State whether this employee xvorks full or part time: 5. State number of hours this employee works each ~veek: 6..Briefly describe the duties of this employee: Account Clerk I _1/1/76-6/30/76 $5304. Full Time 4O 4752. 5184. 7. Give length of service of this employee: One___year a. Entrance rate of pay: b. Date and amount of last increase received: Date 12/1,/7 ~ c. If employee receives additional compensation from city or county state amount: 8. If employee is to replace another, state name and salary of former employee: Name Amount $ 9. Give reasons for increasing salary of employee or creating ne~v position, as the case may be: To conform to County Pay Plan. Amount $. 4368. 240. 7/1/75 - 12/31/75 $ 5064. 1/1/76 - 6/30/76 5304. s~,~d~, 0~ i,,i~ om~ Tre asureI, COUNTY Tide of ~tlc* OF CHESTERFIELD ' Carmel whi~ word ~ ~ ~.l~llc:~le. Dsm C. B, Form 14 1SM 9/73 COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA COMPENSATION BOARD RICHMOND INSTRUCTIONS Officers Compensated on Salary Basis--- l. Prepare this form in triplicate--orlg!nal to accompany request filed with Compensation Board; carbon to accom- pany copy of request filed with local governing body. 2. It is not necessary for the principal officer to prepare this form in instances where the Compensation Board is re- quested to allow a sum for temporary positions. 5. This form should be filed in all instances where an increase in salary or new position.is requested. Officers Compensated on Fee Basis---Prepare this form in duplicate, original to accompany estimate of expenses filed with · the Compe.n. sat[o..n B,o. ard. Also fo. llow.!nstructions 2 and 3. THE COMPENSATION BOARD: Request {s made for the aI!owancc of the following increased rate of pay cffect~vc i. Name of employee: Edna K. Mann 2. Present rate of compensation 3. Proposed salarJ/1/75-12/31/75 $8472. 4. State whether this employee works full or part time: 5. State number of hours this employee works each week: 6. Briefly describe the duties of this employee: Account and Records Supervisor $. 8160. 1/1/76-6/30/76 $8856. Fk122. Time 40 8664. Fifteen years Amount $ 7. Give length of service of this employee: a. ]Entrance rate of pay: b. Date and amount of last increase received: Date 1/1/75 c. If employee receives additional compensation from city or county state amount: 8. If employee is to replace another, state name and salary of former employee: Name Amount $ 9. Give reasons for increasing salary of employee or creating new position, as the case may be: To conform t:o County Pa,v Plan, $2040. 708. 7/1/75 - 12/31/75 $ 8/472. 1/1/76 - 6/30/76 8856. Tide ot P. P, HESTERFIELD 'Can~l whichever word i.~ no~ sl~ptlmble. ~ C. B. Form 14- 15M 9/73 CONIMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA COMPENSATION BOARD R ICI-II~IOND INSTRU~IO~S Officers ~mpen~ted on Sal~y Ba~i~ 1. Prepare this ~orm in triplicate~orig~nal to accompany request filed with Compensation Eoard; carbon to accom- pany copy ~ request filed with local go~ermng body. 2. It is not necessary ~or the principal officer to prepare this ~orm in instances where the Compensation Board is re- quested ~o allow a sum ~or temporary positions. 3. This ~orm shouM be flied in ~11 instances where an increase in sMary or new position is requested. Officer~ Compen~t~ on Fee Basi~Prepare this form in duplicate, ori~inxl to accompany esthnate of exper,~es 2~.ed v.'kh 'the c°m~bh'sat'i6fi'~oard. Also f°llo~'sn~tru~ti°ns 2 and 3. ' THE COMPENSATION BOARD~ ' Request is made for the allowance of the .... ~ iacceased rate of pay effective (date) 1. Name of employee: Sarah P. Pampl~n 2. Present rate of compensation 3. Proposed salary7/1/75-12/31/75 $6120. 4. State whether this employee works full or part time: $. State number of hours this employee works each ~veek: 6.: Briefly ~le~rilJg fh'e duties d[ tl~is e~pio'ye~e: -' Account Clerk II 1/1/76-_6~,30/76 $6408. Full Time 40 5808. 6264. Seven years Amount 7. Give length of service of this employee: a. Entrance rate of pay: b. Date and amount of last increase received: Date.. "1 fl fTb c. If employee receives additional compensation from city or county state amount: 8. If employee is to replace another, state name and salary of former employee: Name Amount $. 9. Give reasons for increasing salary of employee or creating new position, as the case may be: To conform to County Pay Plan. $. 2700. 228. 711/75 - 12131/75 $ 6120. 1/1/76 - 6/30/76 6408, - ' $~g~e of pnnd~"officer COUNTY OF %r FERFIELD · Cancel whlchever wout i~ no~ applicable. C. B. Form 14 15N{ 9/73 COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIP'~ COMPENSATION BOARD RICHMOND INSTRUCTIONS Officers Compensated on Salary Basis--- 1. Prepare this form in triplicate--origi, nal to accompany request filed with Compensation Board; carbon to accom- pan3' cop3' of request filed with local governing body. 2. It is not necessary for the principal officer to prepare this form in ii:stances where the Compensation Board is re- quested to allow a sum for temporary positions. ,3. This form should be filed in all instances xvhere an increase in salary or new position is requested. Officers Compensated on Fee Basis--Prepare this form in duplicate, orig{na! to accompany estimate of expenses filed with the Compensation Board. Also follow instructions 2 and 3. ..... · .' :.,:.:[:~?.-. ... ~ ....: - THE COMPENSATION BOARD: .Request is made for the allo~vance of the following increased r:te of pay effective (date) I. Name of employee: Evelyn T, Price 2. Present rate of compensation 3. Proposed salary 7/1/75-12/3:1./75 864_08. 4. State whether this employee works full or part time: 5. State number of honrs this employee works each week: 6. Briefly describe the duties of this employee: Ac~odn't':~erk i'I '" : ~ .... '' _1/1/76-6/30/76 $6696. V~I 1 Tim~ 40 $ 6096. $ 6552. 7, Give length of service of this employee: Eight Years a. :Entrance rate of pay: b, Date and amount of last increase received: Date.. :t-/]./75 c. If employee receives additional compensation'from city or county state amount: 8. If employee is to replace another, state name and salary of former employee: Name Amount $. 9. Give reasons for increasing salary of employee or creating new position, as the case may be: To conform to County Pay Plan. $ 2700. _ Amount $ 552. 7/1/75 - 12/31/75 $6408. 1/1/76 - 6/30/76 6696. 'Cancel whlche~'~ wool i~ m ~l>ptk~ble. C. B. Ft~rm 14 15~I 9/7:t -'- COblMONWEALTH OF VIRGINI''~ COMPENSATION BOARD RICHMOND INSTRUCTIONS Officers Compensated on Salary Basi~- 1. Prepare this form in triplicate--orig!nal to accompany request filed with CompensatiOn Board; carbon to accom- pan)- copy of request filed with local governing body. 2. It is not necessary for the principal officer to prepare this form in instances where the Compensation Board is quested to allow a sum for temporary positions. ,3. This form should be filed in all instances where an increase in salary or new position is requested. Officers Compensated on Fee BasiS--Prepare this form in duplicate, original to accompany estimate of expenses filed xxith the Compensation Board. Also follow instructions 2 and 3. THE COMPENSATION BOARD: Request is rhade for the allowance of the following increased rate of pay efiect~e (date) 1. Nameof employee: Frances C~ Reams 2. Present rate of compensation 3. Proposed salary 7/1/75712/31/75 $5832 4. State whether this employee works full or part time: 5. State number of hours this employee works each week: 6. _,1/1Z_7~6-__6/30/76 $6120. Full Time 40 5520. $. M 5976. Briefly describe the duties of th. is e. mployee: AcC6unt? ~i'er'k'-iI'' ..... ,: ..' 7. Give length of service of this employee: Five years a. Entrance rate of pay: b. Date and amount of last increase received: Date 1/1/75 c. If employee receives additional compensation from city or county state amount: 8. If employee is to replace another, state name and salary of former employee: Name Amount $ 9. Give reasons for increasing salary of employee or creating ne~v position, as the case may be: To conform to County Pay Plan. $ 3610. i92. ~Amount $. 7/1/75- 12/31/75 $ 5832. 1/1/76 - 6/30/76 6120. 'Cancel whiche~r wo~d /~ not ~ppti~d)l[ C. B. Form 14 ~ COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIf~`~ COMPENSATION BOARD RICHMOND INSTRUCTIONS Officers Compensated on Salary Basi~-- 1. Prepare this form in triplicate--original to accompany request filed with Compensation Board; carbon to accom- pany copy of request filed xvith local governing body. 2. It is not necessary for the principal officer to prepare this form in instances where the Compensation Board is re- quested to allow a sum for temporary positions. ,3. This form should be filed in all instances where an increase in salary or new position is requested. Officers Compensated on Fee Basi~--Prepare this form in duplicate, original to accompany estimate of expenses filed with the Compensation Board. Also follow.instructions 2 and 3. THE.COMP.ENSATION BOARD:.. dl& !- 157[ Request is made for the al!owanc~ of the following o~l-r2txeeR: ' '/:',. ' increased rate c~f pay effective (date) '" ' ;':'q t9. !. X;:meof employee: Mrs. Margarek C. Rieves 2. Present rate of compensation 3. Proposed salary. 7/_1/75-12/31/75 4. State whether this employee works full or part time: 5. State number of hours this employee works each week: 6. Briefly describe ~the duties of this employee: ., , , -,.. ~% :: :,;':'. .~:...,~.: ?.,. .~-Acc.oun~c Clerk II ~/1/76-~t6/30/76 $6696. .EtLL1 Time 40 $ 6096. $. 6552. 7. Give length of service of this employee: Eight years a. Entrance rate of pay: b. Date and amount of last increase received: Date. 1/1_~75 c. If employee receives additional compensation from city or county state amount: 8. If employee is to replace another, state name and salary of former employee: Name -Amount $. 9. Give reasons for increasing salary of employee or creating new position, as the case may be: To conform to County Pay Plan. ----Amount 2580. 264. 7/1/75-12/31/75 $6408. 1/1/76 - 6/30/76 6696, "Can~l whlchC~r word Tide of offfc*---- -- COUNTY OF CltESTERFIELD t.!,'12 ?, ,i t':!/!7 C. B. Form 14 liM 9/73 -~' COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA COMPENSATION BOARD RICHMOND INSTRUCTIONS Officers Compensated on Salary Basis.-- 1. Prepare this form in triplicate--original to accompany request filed with Compensation Board; carbon to accom- pany cop), of request filed with local governing body. 2. It is not necessary for the principal officer to prepare this form in instances where the Compensation Board is re- quested to allow a sum for temporary positions. 3. This form should be filed in all instances where an increase in salary or new position is requested. Officers Compensated on Fee Basis--Prepare this form in duplicate, orig'inal to accompany estimate of expenses f-;!ed with the Compensation ~,~ard. Also follow instr.uctions 2 and 3. THE COMPENSATION BOARD:_ . Request is made for the allowance of the following increased !. Name of employee: Janet ~.._ S~vey 2. Present rate of compensation 3. Proposed salary 7/1/75-12/3]/75 $770a_~ 4. State whether this employee works full or part time: 5. State number of hours this employee works each week: 6...Briefly describe ~he duties qr.[his ~ployee: ~ '. · , d.'":':'..~ i' - " '.~ , ; ,' ' ' .. ,, ' · : -~ ~. 'Accoun~ Control Technician rate ,:,t pay effectire ([date) 1/1./76-6/3o/7~$8o8a 7392. 7896. Ful~Time 40 7. Give length of service of this employee: _Tggelve years a. Entrance rate of pay: b. Date and amount of last increase received: Date q/l/75 c. If employee receives additional compensation from city or county state amount: 8. If employee is to replace another, state name and salary of former employee: Name Amount $ 9. Give reasons for increasing salary of employee or creating new position, as the case may be: To conform ¢o County Pay Plan. Amount 2220.___ 576. 7/1/75 - 12/31/75 $ 7704. 1/1/76 - 6/30/76 8088. 'Caac~l whichever word is no~ sppllotbl,. Tide of or, ce COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD Form 1~ ISM 9/75 ~ COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINLa~ COMPENSATION BOARD RICHMOND INSTRUCTIONS Officers Compensated on Salary Ba,is-- 1. Prepare this form in triplicate--original to accompany request filed ~vith Compensation Board- carbon to accom- pany copy of request filed with local governing body. , 2. It is not necessary for the principal officer to prepare this form in instances where the Compensation Board is re- quested to allow a sum for temporary positions. 3. This form should be filed in all instances where an increase in salary or new position is requested~ Officers Compensated on Fee Basls~Prepare this form in duplicate, ori~'inal to accompany estimate of expenses filed with the Compensation Board. Also follow instrnctions 2 and 3. Request is made for the allowance 6f the kdiowing entrance* i~]~([ rate ,-~f' p~y effect/:.:: ('d:~te) · i:2. ,. ,~,,m_of employee: Bonnie J. _~purlock 2. Present rate of compensation 3. Proposed salary_7/~}5-~~. 1/1/78-6/30/76 $5804. w'll $ 5184. 4. State whether this employe~work~full or part time: Full Time 5. 5tare number of hours this employee ~S~~: ~.1 WO~k~ ~ hours each week. 6..~r~e~iy describe the duties of this empIoyee: 7. Give length of service of this employee: Part time pjaypo_ll fei, last a. Entrance rate of pay: b. Date and amount of last increase received: Date_ c. If employee receives additional compensation from city or county state amount: 8. If employee is to replace another, state name and salary of former employee: IN, amc -Amount $. 9. Give reasons for increasing salary of employee or creating new position, as the case may be: To conform to County Pay Plan, yeap. Amount $_ __ 7/1/75-12/31/75 1/1/76-6/30/76 $5064. 5304. COUNTY 0 C,IESTERFIELD 'Cancel whichev.r wor~ is no~ spplfcsbl~. 13~ C. B. Form 1~ 1SM 9/73 ~OMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA COMPENSATION BOARD RICHMOND INSTRUCTIONS Officers Compensated on Salary Ba~i~-- 1. Prepare this form in triplicate--original to accompany request filed with Compensation Board; carbon to accom- pany copy of request filed ~vith local governing body. 2. It is not necessary for the principa, l.officer to prepare this form in instances where the Compensation Board is re- queste, d to allow a sum for temporary potations. 3, This form should be filed in all instances where an increase itt salary or new position is requested. Officers Compensated on Fee Basis~Prepare this form in duplicate, orig'imd to accompany estimate of expenses ~ited with the'Comp'ensati~firB0ayd._Also foll.ow:inst!uctions 2 and 3. THE cOMPENSATION BOARD:. '.'-;-'-;.. Reqt~est is made for the al!owance of the following 1/1/76-6/30/76 $530~. Will work full eime. 40 hours each week 5184. [. Name o± employee: Vickie B, _Teague___ 2. Present rate of compensation 7/1/75-12/31/75 $5064. 3. Proposed salary 4. State whether this employee 5, State number of hours this employe~fl6r~ each week: 6. Briefly de~.~)ibe'/'.f-h~'du'tii/~ of:.th[~-.~rhP!oyee :. , - · - Account Clerk I 7. Give length of service of this employee: a. Entrance rate of pay: b. Date and amount of last increase received: Date c. If employee receives additional compensation from city or county state amount: 8. If employee is to replace another, state name and salary of former employee: Name Amount $. 9. Give reasons for increasing salary of employee or creating new position, as the case may be: To conform with County Pay Plan. Part time payroll for last year. Amount $. 7/1/75-12/31/75 1/1/76-6/30/76 $5064. 5304. 'C.~ncel whiche~' word C. B, Form 14 1SM 9/?3 ~'- ~ THE COMPENSATION BOARD..: Request is made for the allowance of the following increased 1. Name of employee: Mary W. McGuire COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA COMPENSATION BOARD RICHMOND INSTRUCTIONS Officers Compensated on Salary Basis-- 1. Prepare this form in triplicate--original to accompany request filed with Compensation Board; carbon to accom- pan)' cop)' of request filed with local governing body. 2. It is not necessary for the principal officer to prepare this form in instances where the Compensation Board is ques%ed to allow a sum for temporary positions. 3. This form should be filed in all instances where an increase in salary or new position {s requested. Officers Compensated on Fee Basi~Prepare this form in duplicate, original to accompany estimate of expensesfiled with the Compensalio~z~Board. Also follow in{tructions 2 and 3. rate o[ pay effective (date) )'~_, 1~ 2. Present rate of compensation 3. Proposed salary. ..7/1/75-12/31/75 810:680.. 4. State whether this employee works full or part time: 5. State number of hours this employee works each week: 6..Briefly describe the duties of this employee: Deputy Treasurer 1/1_~_76 - 6/30/76 Full Time 40 10,368. $. $11,208 $ 10,944. 7. Give length of service of this employee: Twenty-seven years a. Entrance rate of pay: b. Date and amount of last increase rece{ved: Date ] ,/]/75 c. If employee receives additional compensation from city or county state amount: 8. If employee is to replace another, state name and salary of former employee: Name Amount $. 9. Give reasons for increasing salary of employee or creating ne~v position, as the case may be: To conform to County Pay Plan. $ 1500. Amount $. 360. 7/!/75 - 12/31/75 $10,680. 1/1/76 - 6/30/76 11,208. 'Cancel whlchc*tr wm'd i* no~ BOARD OF SUPERVISORS JRVIN O. HORNER, CHAIRMA~ CLOVER HILL DISTRICT LEO MYERS, V~CE CHAIRMAN BERMUDA DISTRICT BOARD OF SUPERVISORS J. RLIFFIN APP.ER$ON .6, LDR~CH J. KREPELA £. MERLI~ O'NEILL SR. MATO~CA mSTmC~ COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD April 17, 1975 CHESTERFIELD, M. W. BURNETT EXECUTFVE SECRETARY M. W. Burnett County Administrator Chesterfield County SUBJECT: First Realty Mortgage Corporation 7825 Midlothian Pike VIRGINIA Dear Mr. Burnett: Further reference is made to the above firm and their remarks to you regarding this county's high tax rate on their local business license, as set forth under local ordinance, Section 5-104. As you know, this section was re-adopted by the Board in 1973 with the effective date of January 1, 1974. The rate of tax was taken from other sections of the code which applied to other lending businesses in the county. The above firm is located in rental space, which measures less than 1000 square feet. On my two visits to the location, I have never found but one employee in the office, but this office gross receipts for the year 1974 amounted to $249,930.56. This gross was earned from interest made on first mortgage loans and does not include any amount paid on the principal. I!In talking with Mr. Wise, who is president of the above firm, I have found out that he was very active in our 1975 General ssembly, and he was very familiar with Sections 58., of the irginia State Code, mainly Section 58-266.1, which now says hat all business license are frozen until 1976. 2 In view of the above firm's activity in Henrico County, where there business license tax is two and one-half times what they pay in this county, I am of the opinion maybe our rate should remain as is until the 1976 General Assembly convenes, or Henrico county reduces their rate at which time the Board could re-evaluate the request for reduction. In all fairness to First Realty Mortgage and Mr. Wise, it may be that the Board may want to give him ten minutes to speak at any regular Board meeting by invitation only. Hoping I have been of some assistance, I remain Very truly yours, ~: D. Williams, Jr. '~/License Inspector JDWJr: p h ARTICLE XII f,OAN ¢iOMPANti;',S AND BANKERS 5-103. aav'~ngs .... and 'Loan Assoc:,.atlon~' ' ~ ;:]v~'k'v savings and loan association having :0x the~'cforo of fifty dollar~. '.~0ctio~ 5~104. First Mortp~a~e Loans :;,all pay for tho privilege an .,~.t,ual license tax t~a~efor equal to three hundred dollars o~d ~even~y-~_ive hundredths cz one per centum ~-~ ttie a~o~s-', rec~zpt~' o2 'the business in excess of thirty thousand dollars. The "ce~m "~=oss re~ezpts" a~ used in :n~s zecu~on, shall be deemed to mean the ..... s xnte:'est, g~oss discount~ gross con~ission ........ ~.oso receipts earned by means of~ or .... , ' - ....... ' but ~=o~!ui,g from, such fi~ancial transact~ons~ ~n= te~m '~gross receipts" shall not include amounts received as payment of principal. S-_-ction 5-105. Other money !endcrs. Every person, except those engaged in first mortgage loans and first mortgage note purchasing, conducting or engaging in any of the following money lending or note purchasing occupa':ions, businesses or trades, namely; an industrial loan company, or loan or mortgage company, insurance premium finance company, a factor~ a buyer of promissory notes~ deed of ~r~t notes or installment loan agreements~ s!mll pay for the privilege an annual license tax therefor equal to five hundred dollars and one per centum of the gross receipts of ~ho Imsiness in e~rcess of thirty thousand d~ ! ars. The term "gross receipts" as used in :.~ut.~ section, shall be deemed to mean the -" ~ gross discount, gross · .~?:nission or other gross receipts earned b7 ~.~nns of or resu!tin§ from such finoncin! · 7.n:%sactions, but the term "~ross rccei.-.ts'? ~!~9!1 Eot inc].ude amounts received ~ payue/.~ ,~f principal. Every p~rson ~'~ce. nsed undc, r uhct \'frg~n~a ",~c3~ receipts of the busincss in excess cf or:y-eight thousand dollars excluding rci~aymants of primcjpa!. ' ' 5- :3ctzon 1.05 2 Other lenders of conditional sales co~tracts. Every person, other It:mn a person ?q~-,n~a,.~._=._~_ under the Virginfa c~,~,.~..~.,.~ T.cen i.e:~. cn3c.ged in the buoSness o' lending m-,'r=c'e n-',~-.~ for the purchase o::, motor vchicl.es, %. ~.~ ~ . ,'.~-~'~e~'-~n''~ radios oil or gas burners .,~,,~,~,n1.. ~ ~_..~,_ a],pl~ances ~ household fvrnf, ture or equipment o~ any other goods or chattc!s, ...]~,e~ new or used~ secured by a lien on ~ ~ chattels, paying the p~ ~ch~- ,,f any goods or chattels Eot ~he Eu,'cr ax~ -:c:uring the sum so paid by a lien on thc same cr by the purchase from a dealer of FIR. REALTY MORTGAGE Corp. An Affi,,..,e of First & Merchants Corporation 1510 Willow Lawn Drive · P. O. Box 26180 Richmond, Virginia 23260 Telephone 804/264-4234 Mr. M. W. Bnrnett Executive Secretary, Chesterfield County Chesterfield County Court House Chesterfield, Virginia 23832 March 4, 1975 Dear Mr. Burnett: I am directing this correspondence to your attention at the suggestion of Mr. Williams, Commissioner of Revenue's Office for Chesterfield County. On 11 February, 1975, I forwarded to the Chesterfield County Commissioner of Revenue's Office this firm's check in payment of our 1975 license tax. A copy of the forwarding letter is attached for your information. My purpose in writing you is to bring to your attention the enormity of this gross receipts tax and its adverse effect on a desirable and viable business. I fullyunderstand and appreciate the necessity for each business to pay a fair and equitable share of the required tax allocation. However, I do not believe that you or the Board of Supe~zisors intended a tax which heavily penalizes a badly needed business in today's economy nor for the same to be applied in a discriminatory manner as outlined in the attached letter. This firm operates from fourteen locations in the States of Virginia, Maryland, Georgia and Ohio and could not continue to operate profitably if all locations levied a license tax such as contained in your Article XII, Sections 5-104 and 5-105. For your information, I am attaching the license tax basis for Fairfax County, Virginia which I view as a fair and impartial tax. The Cities of Norfolk, Portsmouth and Virginia Beach require a flat-fee charge of approximately $650.00 per year in all cases. Our offices in Maryland, Ohio and Georgia are assessed license fees of $200.00 to $300.00 per location. I respectfully request that a review be made of your Article XII and Sections 5-103, 5-104 and 5-105 and that hopefully a more fair and reasonable license tax will result therefrom. To my knowledge, I do not know of any lender similar to this firm with offices in Chesterfield County. The requested changes perhaps might encourage other lenders to establish offices in your growing community. I congratulate you on your fine personnel within the office of the Commissioner of Revenue. They have been most courteous and helpful. Virginia: McLean, Newport News, Norfolk, Richmond, Roanoke, Portsmouth, Virginia Beach · Maryland: Camp Springs, Rockville, Silver Spring Georgia: Atlanta, Marietta · Ohio: Columbus ~roh H, 1975 P~e 2 I will be happy to provide you with any additional information that you may desire. Sincerely, Dwain Wise President DW/egn Enclosures CC Mr. Irving Homer Chairman, Board of Supervisors Chesterfield County Court House Chesterfield, Virginia 23832 I t / I CASE HISTORY AND PAST COMMISSION AND BOARD ~CTION FOR THIS REQUEST C.P.C. 3 18 75: Approval of this request is recommended, subject to the imposition of the following conditions: 1. This Conditional Use shall be granted to and for Julian Temple only and shall be restricted to the operation of a retail boat sales and accessory sales business. 2. No additions to the existing structure nor any new struc- ture shall be permitted, nor shall any other substantial improvement be made to the property. 3. The access drive and parking area serving this use shall be gravelled. 4. The above noted conditions notwitkstanding the bulk regu- lations as applicable in the B-3 zone shall apply to the use of this parcel. -2- April 23, 1975 (B.S.) CASE NUMBER: 755O50 APPLICANT: Julian Temple ~UEST: A Conditional Use to permit the operation of a boat sales business. PROPOSED USE: Occ~ancy of an existing single family residence for the purpose of selling boats and associated accessories. TAX MAP IEENTIFICATION: Clover Hill Magisterial District, Tax Map Section 28-2 (1) Parcel 4 (Sheet 8). GENERAL LOCA~iON: Boarding the south lot of Route 60 within the right-of-way for the interchange facility at the intersection of proposed Powhite Parkway and Midlothian Turnpike. ACREAGE: Approximately . 7 acres. EXISTING ZOhrR~G: Agricultural (A). EXISTR~G LAND USE (SUBJECT PARCEL): One ranch style single family residence. ADJAC~ AND AHL~ ZONING AND LAND USE: Ail adjacent property is zoned Agricultural (A) with the exception of parcels to the north across Route 60 which are zoned Community Business (B-2). ~he majority of the adjacent property remains vacant and undeveloped however the parcel in question is located within an area of the Route 60 corrider which has experienced relatively heavy comnercial development. PUBLIC FACITITY~q: ~he proposed use should have no impact on either existing or future area public facilities. TRANSPO~rATION ~3~ TRAFFIC: This parcel is located beneath the proposed right-of- way for Po~daite Parkway. It has been the policy of the County not to approve either rezonings or land uses which would permit improvement of the property within the right- of-way of proposed major arterial highways. However, in order to accomodate development while at the sm~ tin~ offering protection of the right-of-way, this policy has been broadened to permit Conditional Use and Special Exception request which allows the right-of-way to be used where circumstances and conditions dictate that no substantial improversnt of the property is made. The subject request represents such a situation. 5he application states that it is the intent to use the existing dwelling for con~nercial purposes. Such use will require no additional structures nor no additions to the existing structure. GENERAL PLAN: Right-of-way for proposed Powhite Parkway. STAFF AN~LYST_S k\~ RECOM~EMDATIONS: As discussed in the paragraph dealing with Transportation mud Traffic, the proposed use as outlined and method of zoning ~ control is Ln keeping with the policy .for permitting development within the right- of-way of Powhite Parkway. It should be noted that similar uses have been permitted in this area and were restricted so as not to permit substantial improvement to the properties involved. over) R-? ,,/,,.,, R-ff 75s050 Conditional Use Scale 1"=500, Sheet 8 STAFF ANalYSIS ~D RECO~4ENDATION: On February 18, 1975 the Commission reviewed the applicant's Declaration of Intent which requested permission to proceed with making application as stated above. The Commission resolved that Mr. Johnson be allowed to proceed subject to the following'instructions: 1. A site plan which will serve as the Master Plan shall be prepared and submitted. This plan shall be drawn to scale showing the loca- tion of existing structures on the parcel, the proposed second dwelling, and the accommodating driveway and parking area. 2. The second dwelling unit shall be located behind the existing residence and towards the interior of the parcel. In making this application Mr. Johnson has submitted the necessary plan as re- quested by the Commission. In addition, review of the plan indi- cates that as instructed by Item 92, the second dwelling unit would be located as desired. In reviewing this request Planning Staff would note that the pro- posed use and structure to be built is in keeping with the policy of permitting second dwellings on parcels when such domiciles provide for either extended family relationships or serve a need in case of hardship. The parcel in question is of sufficient size to accommodate the proposed second dwelling and should be of no detriment to area properties. The size and configuration of adjacent parcels are such that accommodation of a minimal increase in residential density will not alter the lifestyle or appearance of the neighborhood. CASE HISTORY AND P~ST COMMISSION AND BOARD ACTION FOR THIS REQUEST C~P~. 3 18 75: Approval of tke request is recommended, subject to the ~mposition of tke following conditions: 1. This Conditional Use shall be restricted to and for Herbert C. Johnson and the use of his immediate family only. Lease or rental of the second dwelling unit shall not be permitted. 2. A system providing water and a method of sewage disposal shall be approved by the County Health Department prior to the issuance of any building permit. 3. This Conditional Use shall be confined to the erection of only one additional residence on the parcel. The second dwelling shall be located as indicated on the plan presented with the application. The driveway serving the second dwelling unit shall be either paved or gravelled. -2- April 23, 1975 (B.S.) ~Ma~e h--l~-; ~. CASE NUMBER: 75S051 APPLICANT: Herbert C. Johnson REQUEST: A Conditional Use for Planned Development to permit a second dwelling. PROPOSED USE: Applicant desires to construct a second residence to the rear of his existing home so that his son and daughter-in- law may have a place to live. TAX MAP IDE5~IFICATION: Clover Hill Magisterial District, Tax Map Section 63 (1) Parcel 5 (Sheet 21). GENERAL LOCATION: The parcel fronts the northeast line of Claypoint Road southeast of the intersection of Claypoint and Baileys Bridge Roads. ACREAGE (SUBJECT PARCEL): Approximately 4 acres. EXISTING ZONING: Agricultural (A). EXISTING LAND USE (SUBJECT PARCEL): and various outbuildings. A one story single family dwelling ADJACENT AND AREA ZONING AND LAND USE: Ail adjacent property is zoned Agricultural (A) with the exception of property to the west, across Claypoint Road, which is zoned Residential (R-15). Adja- cent property remains either vacant or under agricultural culti- vation or is occupied by single family residences. UTILITIES: Tke use of public water and sewer is not feasible. SOIL PROFILE: 90% of this parcel has soils that are poorly or mode- rately drained with seasonable water tables less than 24 inches in depth. It may be difficult %o find an area to accommodate a well and septic tank. DRAINAGE AND EROSION: The parcel drains toward Swift Creek and no particular drainage or erosion control problems are anticipated. REQUIRED OFF-SITE EASEMENTS: required. An off-site drainage easement may be TRANSPORTATION AND TRAFFIC: The second dwelling will be served by an existing driveway which will be extended past the applicant's home. GENERAL PLAN: Vacant/Agricultural use of the area encompassing the parcel in question. (over) A City of Richmond Office of the City Mans~er Mr. Michael C. Ritz Director of Planning Planning Department Chesterfield, Virginia April 1, 1975 23832 900 East Broad Street, Richmond, Virginia 23219 80 4 · 649-538e~ Dear Mike: Attached is what I hope is the final draft of this Section 5 policy statement. Admittedly, there are a couple of confusing paragraphs, but the intent is for all jurisdictions to participate equally accord- ing to the extent of service which is provided in that jurisdiction. Should you have questions concerning this statement, do not hesitate to call me. Sincerely, Daniel W. Allen Administrative Assistant DWA/j mb Attachment: I City of Richmond Office o£ the City Manager 900 East Broad Street, Richmond, Virginia 23219 804. 649-5386 March 12, Mr. Michael C. Ritz Department of Planning County of Chesterfield Chesterfield, Virginia 23832 1975 Dear Mike: Attached is a revised Page 4 to the Section 5 agreement which addresses the equity of funds credited against a jurisdiction's deficit and the use of Section 5 funds to ensure one-half of the subsidy for any new service. If you have any questions, do not hesitate to call me. Sincerely, Daniel W. Allen Administrative As si stant DWA:jmb Attachment: City of Richmond Office of the City Manager Mr. Michael C. Ritz Director of Planning County of Chesterfield Chesterfield, Virginia March 6, 1975 23832 900 East Broad Street, Richmond, Virginia 23219 804 · 649-5886 Dear Mike: The attached represents an updated draft of the Section 5 policies statement. Please review and let me know if another meeting will be necessary. I want to take this to the GRTC Board at its meeting on March 18th if at all possible. If you have questions concerning any of the sections, please give me a call. Sincerely, Daniel W. Allen Administrative As sistant DWA/jmb Atta chm e nt: March 26, 1975 USE OF FUNDS, UNDER SECTION 5, URBAN MASS TRANSPORTATION ACT OF 1964 AS AMENDED I The purpose of this agreement is to provide a framework by which projects eligible for funding under Section 5 will be identified and eligibility re- requirements fulfilled in order that the region can effectively utilize these funds. II It is mutually agreed that: A. Greater Richmond Transit Company shall serve as the designatedL/'/' recipient of Section 5 funds for the urbanized areas of the Richmond Metropolitan Area. This designation may be supplemented or changed as provided in the regulations issued by the Urban Mass Transporta- tion Administration. B. An annual program of projects for funding under Section 5 of the Urban Mass Transportation Act of 1964, as amended, the total Federal costs of which shall not exceed the amount of funds appor- tioned to the Richmond area, will be developed as a part of the up- dating of the Transit Development Program and will be considered as a part thereof. 1. During the development of the Transit Development Program, Greater Richmond Transit Company shall consult.with a com- mittee composed of a representative from the Virginia Depart- ment of Highways and Transportation, private carriers in the regien, Richmond Regional Planning District Commission and units___oflocal government. Other agencies and organizations who have interest in mass transit services in the region will be invited to submit projects to be included in the Transit Development Program and program of projects. It is the intent of this sub-paragraph to insure that full consideration is given to the ~eeds and views of all in- terested parties prior to final formulation of staff recommen- dations and their presentation to the .Board of Directors of Greater Richmond Transit Company. The Transit Development Program, including the annual pro- gram of projects under Section 5 of the Urban Mass Transpor- tation Act of 1964, as amended, w~i!~ the Richmo,__nd ...... Regional Planning Commission for its review and approval. The review shall be performed by the Transporta- tion Policy Committee for the Commission. In the event that the Transportation Policy Committee does not approve the Transit Development Program adopted by the Board of Directors of Greater Richmond Transit Company, the. Transportation Policy Committee shall meet with representatives of Greater Richmond Transit Company for the purpose of reaching mutual agreement on the program. Should amendments be made to the Transit Development Pro- 'gram during the year, the program of projects may also be amended to reflect service level or monetary changes. Applications based on the annual program of projects shall be sub- mitted by Greater Richmond Transit Company to the U. S. Department III of Transport~ation, Urban Mass Transportation Administration, on behalf of all providers of urban mass transportation services in the urbanized area. Such application will be subject to re- view by local governments under provisions of OMB Circular A-95. General Policy Statements A. Transit services will be provided to the participating counties, at their request pursuant to Section 15.1-526.2 of the Code of Virginia, on the basis of the policy stated in the current Transit Development Program. The total cost of such service to GRTC shall be computed in accordance with the f~ set forth in the cUrrent Transit Development Program and the actual costs of each participating jurisdiction will be reduced to the extent that such total costs are ./~e by the Federal and State governments. ing the procedure outlined for the annual update of the Program. Within the framework of the current Transit Development Program, GRTC capital and operating budgets may be amended by the GRTC Board of Directors to reflect adjustments among line items or:changes in cost levels. GRTC will implement the current Transit Development Program, as approved by the Transportation POlicy Committee, to the extent that its requirements for capital and operating funds are met from full system revenues and funds made available through service payments or grants from Federal, State, and local governmentso De governments "Total system costs" shall mean the entire cost associated with the overall operation of the transit system. Total system cost shall include, but shall not be limited to, the following items of expense: Equipment Maintenance Transportation ' Station ' Traffic and Advertising Insurance and Safety Administrative and General Operating taxes Greater Richmond Transit Company will make maximum use of Federal assistance under the Urban Mass Transportation Act of 1964 and the Federal Aid Highway Act. Funds available under Section 5 of the Urban Mass Transportation Act of 1964 will be used first to assist in replacement of buses which are at least 12 years old, provided that operating and maintenance costs have reached a point where continuance in service is un- economical and second to assist in meeting operating deficits. The amount payable each fiscal year by the participating juris- dictions must equal the total system costs (exclusive of ca~0ital costs) incurred in all operations of the transit system, less total revenues from all sources (exclusive of service payments or operating subsidy grants made by the participating jurisdictions) less operating assistance payments from the Federal and State b. "Total revenues" shall mean all money collected from the operation of the transit system from all sources, but shall not mean money supplied by Federal, State or local jurisdictions in the form of service payments or operating subsidies. ~ ~_ The amount payable by each participating puted by multiplying the total amount payable by all jurisdic- tion by the percentage which the cost of service provided that county, determined in accordance with the formula set forth in the Transit Development Program, bears to total system costs (exclusive of capital costs). The remaining amount, after de- termination of the participating county shares, shall be borne by the City of Richmond. In the event of an eligible new service, the credit to the parti- cipating jurisdiction(s) will, to the extent that funds are avail- able, be 50 percent of the deficit incurred through the operation of that service during the initial six months of operation. For the purpose of this paragraph "New Service" shall mean a new route or a substantial extension of a current route to provide service into an area which is not served by mass transportation service. An amount equal to 5 percent of the funds apportioned in any fiscal year shall be held in reserve at the time of submission of the program of projects to assist in financing new services or cost increases. ~:' It. The participating jurisdictions will also pay an amount equal '~ to the local share of Net Project Cost of acquiring (a) replace-  ment facilities and equipment for system-wide use, and (b) new fixed facilities for system-wide use. The amount to be paid by each participating jurisdiction shall be computed in accordance with a formula set forth in the current Transit Development Program. I. The proceeds of sale of facilities or equipment to be replaced are used to reduce Gross Project Cost, of the replacement items. When facilities or equipment for system-wide use become surplus require- ments, the surplus items shall be sold and the proceeds of sale (after refund of the Federal share, if any) shall be distributed or credited to the participating jurisdictions on the basis of the pro- portion of total system costs (exclusive of capital costs) that each will bear in the current fiscal year. When a particular transit service desired by a participating juris- diction requires the acquisition of additional facilities or equipment, the local share of Net Project Costs shall be prorated among the benefiting jurisdictions in accordance with the .formula set forth in the Transit Development Program. When the facilities or equipment to provide this service become surplus, the proceeds of sale shall be distributed or credited in the same proportions as the original contributions to Net Project Co. sts. Transit facilities and equipment lose their identity when they are incorporated into the system. However, should local jurisdictions legally be required to retain title to equipment, the transit operator IV. will maintain records which will enable him to identify this equipment at the time it is sold or otherwise disposed of. All facilities and equipment will, however, be available for use throughout the system on a fair and equitable basis, in accord~- ance with the Transit Development Program, good transit man- agement practices, and the commitments of GRTC under Title VI of the Civil Richts Act and other Federal-aid requirements. L. Section 5 funds will be made available to private operators who meet the requirements of the Urban Mass Transportation Act and the regulations issued thereunder (including requirements to con- serve energy and improve the efficiency of transit service, re- duced fare for the elderly and handicapped, protection of the in- terests of employees under Section 13 (c), and the establishment of a uniform system of accounts'and records), and who agree to provide service in accordance with the approved Transit Develop- ment Program, to the extent that the participating local jurisdic- tions appropriate matching funds for that purpose or, alternatively, that the private operator can provide matching funds from an eligible source, such as contributions from State or local governmental agencies, non-farebox transit revenues ~out not school service or charter revenues), contributed services, undistributed cash surpluses, replacement or depreciation funds or reserves available in cash, or new capital. The undersigned parties agree to the procedures and policy statements included herein as Providing guidance to the affected agencies in this region for the use of Section 5 funds. Greater Richmond Transit Company Hanover County Henrico County Goochland County Chesterfield County Richmond Regional Planning District Commission City of Richmond LIVESTOCK AND POULTRY CLAIM INVESTIGATION REPORT DATE January 3,1975 I, Warden T,E. Radcliffe on this date investigated the claim of t4 r. Oliver N. Wilson ~ address Rt. 1 15~B Bundle Road Chesterfield~ Virginia for 8 3 Rhode Island Red hens, & Sexlink~ hens and 1 White Rock rooster- 8 lbs. no, Description (kind, ag~, w~ight) ..... which occurred on January 2 19 75 in Chesterfield County. I estimate value of $...~.00 __each, total value $ . ... 2&.. 00 . Authority__Virginia State D~partment of Ag.r. ie?~, ture I (~, did not) witness the actual (killing" ...... ' of the animals claimed. The guilty (dog,x~k~ ~ have not)been (caught,°rkilled) and are described as follows: large w..hite..mlxe..d..breed ..... Damage was done in the following manner: chickens and rooster were let out of coope on owners property to feed on ground, stray dog came into yard and caught __ said chickens. ~nd ro.oste.r. As a result of maiming, 0 of the total claimed above were destroyed by the owner, or by me at the owner's request. Following are witnesses: J_e..an~ Wilson - Wife saw dog after she heard chickens I have investigated this claim as thoroughly as possible, I (have: ~x~) viewed the remains of the animals claimed. I (have,~~ viewed the area where said animals were att. acked along with other physical ~widence and I (have, ~ questioned available witnesses. LIVESTOCK AND POULTRY CLAIM iNVESTiGATION REPORT I, Warden R.N. Mills ~ r. L.F. Clay Richmond, Virginia ' for _ 2 ea. Han-Berk shier pigs, 25 lbs. ea., 9 weeks old no. Description (kind~ age, weight) which occurred on . Aori%.14' __193J__in Chesterfield County. I estimate value of $ .90 per. lb.eacb' total value $ 45.00 A u thor it Y_VirKinia S~at e .Department of A_gri cu~ltu__r_s DATE April 14,1975 on this date investigated the claim of address 300 N. Rowland Street I ~ did not) witness the actual (killing ~ of the animals claimed. The guilty (dog,°rdogs) ~ have not) been (caught,orkilled) and are described as follows: ~nknown. don .or dQgs were not seen Dama e done in the following m~nner._ see att~ached photo~ · g was . As a result of maiming, ___D___of the total claimed above were destroyed bs? the owner, or by me at the owner's request. Following are witnesses' I have investigated this claim as thoroughly as possible. I (have, ~ viewed the remains of the animals claimed. I (have, ~) viewed the area where said animals were att. acked along with other physical evidence and I (have,~ questioned available witnesses. Respectfully, FISCAL YEAR REQUEST c. 1M PORTANT Read instructions tm back of this form before preparing request Chesterfield Cou.ty or City Geo. W. Moore, Jr. Nam~ o~ Otfic~r Treasurer Title o~ COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA COMPENSATION BOARD RICHMOND OFFICIAL SALARY AND EXPENSE REQUEST FORM FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDING JUNE 30, 1976 For use by the Treasurers and Commissioners qf the Revenue of the Counties and Cities of the Commonwealth in sub- mitting request for salary and expense allowance for the fiscal year ending June 30, 1976. NOTE--This f. rm must be executed and filed with the ('ompe,.sation Boar, l IMMEI)IATELY. C.~. Form 4 IMPORTANT Read instructions on back of this form BEFORE l~reparing your xequest I. SAIARIF..q: Prlneipah 4oor,. Geo. W., Jr. Treasure~ mat Name Fivlt Nmne Middle J ob Initial Classification Perm~nt Employees: 31unt. Marian T. 3uterbaugh, Lona M. Acct.Clk. II Acct.Clk. II 21ements, Violet L. Acct.& Rec. Supervi ]yler, Rosemary F. Acct.Clk. III qall, A. Rae Acct.Clk. I Ki4d, Grace T. Acct.Clk. III Leonard, Helen K. Acer.Control Tech. ~anr ]dna K. Acct.& Rec. Supervi ~cGuire, Mary W. Deputy Treasurer Pamplin, Sarah P. Acct. Clk. II Price, .Evelyn T~ Acct. Clk. II Reams~ Frances C. Rieves, Margaret C. Spivey, Janet A. Acct.Clk. II Acct.Clk.'-II Acct.Control Tech. Spurlock, Bonnie Acct.Clk. I Teague, Vickie B. Acct. Clk. I Formerly part-time positions 2. OFFICE EXPENSES: BONDS. INSURANCE, SUPPLIES AND CONTRACTUAL SERVICES: Premium on Official Bonds. Burglary and Other Insurance POPULATION ESTIMATE OI~ CHESTERFIELD COUNTY PLANNER AS OF 1/1175 116,548 POPULATION OF AREA(S} ~kHv~u REQUEST FOR SALARIES AND EXPENSES FOR FISCAL YEAR ENDING JUNE 30, 1976 (Al (B) Annual Rate Supplera~nt~ Approved By Approp~l compenmtion by Bo~ For for F~ Fi~ Ye~ Ye~ End~ June 30, 19756/30/75 15,371. (C) Total 5~808. 4~752. 8~160. 6,720. (1970 U. $. CENSUS) CHESTERFIELD City or Coonty Treasurer Annua~ Rate R~uested For Fiscal Year Ending . June 30, 1976 Exclud~ Supp~mmO 16,056. 6~264. 5~184. 8~664. 7,200. 76,855 (El twezn CoL A and CoL D) 685. 456. 432. 504. 480. 4,752. 5,184. 432. 7,056. 7,536. 480. 7,392. 7,896. 504. 8,160. 8,664. 504. 10,368. 10,944. 576. 6,264. 6,559. 5~808. 6,096. 456. 456 5,520. 5,976. 456 6,096. 6,552. 456 7,392. 7,896. 504 5,184. 5,184 5,184. 5,184 (c) ng June 30, 1975 (D) g 5,100. Difference be- ava CoL D) ' 5,100. THIS SPACE BLANK Tax Tickets for State and Local Taxes CoBectible by County or City Treasurers Stationery, Office Supplies, Printing (forms and letters) and Binding Advertising Newspapers, Handbills, etc. (do not include cost of advertising any list of any delinquent taxes of any kindl Postage and P.O. Box Rent Telephone and Telegraph (Tax excluded) 8,500. 11,500. 800. 900. 20,000. 20,000. 3,800. 4~200. 2,750. 3,250. 3,000, 100. 400, 500. Repairs to Office Furniture and Equipment (includin~ Servic~ Contracts) Other neces~, office expenses (classify by object-of-expenditure~ Tote Office Expenses ~6,950. g '35,850', , ~.. ' 9,100. Do~ble Pedestal. De~k. Total Offic~ ~u~niture and Equipment ~00. ~. MILEAGE ~pM Offic~ on Offici~ Bu~e~ (~r u~ by County Officers only) 4. OFFICE FURNITURE AND EQUIPMENT AND RJ~NTAL OF EQUIPMENT: (urn ~p~ate line ~r de~dption of ~eh pi¢~. Explain need ~r ~ pi~e M ~ace below) 1.. ~o,tage ~eter Rental 0300. s. ?s~ ~o~ .. $10o. 2-~ Sorter Retatal 800. 6. ~yp~u~ uzta~r~ 200. ' 7. '~ l0 Key Adders 800, u. ~ vaA~daters 3uuo. 10. Data Processing- 23,325. ,23,325. , 6,051. 5." ' SON FOR PROPOSED INCREASE IN OFFICE EXPENSES REQUESTED IN ITEMS NO. 2 and 3 Increased cost of supplies and services and cost of mailing larger number of tax bills. EXPLANATION OF NEED FOR EACH PIECE OF OFFICE FURNITRUE AND EQUIPMENT REQUESTED IN ITEM NO. 4 (State ~ to each pi~e whether it will be a replacement) 1. & 2. Rental of equipment used by this office. 3. 4. & 8. Additional equipment needed for operatio~ of office. 5. 6. 7. & 9. Replacing office furniture and equipment more than ten years old amd beyond repa~r~ 10. Rental of equipment used by Data Services Department. LEAVed THI~' COLUM~f BLAN/~ April llth April ,1975, I ~nailed (or dEiveredl · true copy of the foregoing -% C. B~ F.'~rm 14 I~M 9/7:t ~'~OMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA ~ COMPENSATION BOARD RICHMOND INSTRUCTIONS Officers Compensated on S~lsry Basis-- 1. Prepare this form in triplicate--orig!nal to accompany request filed with Compensation Board; carbon to accom~ pany copy of request filed with local governing body. 2. It is not necessary for the principal officer to prepare this form in instances where the Compensation Board is re- quested to allow a sum for temporary positions. 3. This form should be filed in all instances where an increase in salary or new position:is requested. Officers Compens,,te~I on Fee Basig Prepare this form in duplicate, original to accompany estimate of expenses filed with the Compensation Board. Also follow instructions 2 and 3. THE COMPENSATION BOARD: Request is made for the allo~vance of the following eX~i~R*~* increased rate of pay effective (date) 1. Name of employee: Geo. W. Moore, Jr. jUL - JAN 1 1976 , ;9 3. Proposed salary 4. State whether this employee works full or part time: __ 5. State number of hours this employee works each week: 6. ·Briefly describe the duties of this employee: Treasurer Present rate of compensation 7/1/75-12/31/75 $15,672. 1/1/76-6/30/76 $16,440. Full Time 45 ~}5~371. 16,056. 7. Give length of service of this employee: a. Entrance rate of pay: b. Date and amount of last increase received: Date July 1, 1974 c. If employee receives additional compensation from city or county state amount: 8. If employee is to replace another, state name and salary of former employee: Name . Amount $ 9. Give reasons for increasing salary of employee or creating new position, as the case may be: To conform to County Pay Plan. Amount $ 1397. 7/1/75 -12/31/75 $15,672. 1/1/76 - 6/30/76 16,440. 'Cancel whichever wold is m~ .ppll~bl*. C. B. Form"14 15M 1/73 COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA COMPENSATION BOARD RICHMOND INSTRUCTIONS Officers Compensated on Salary Basis-- 1. Prepare this form in triplicate--orig!nal to accompany pany copy of request filed with local govermng body. 2. It is not necessary for the principal officer to prepare quested to allow a sum for temporary positions. 3. This form should be filed in all instances where an increase in salary or new position.is requested. Officers Compensated on Fee Basi~--Prepare this form in duplicate, original to accompany estimate of expenses filed vith the Compensation Board. Also follow instructions 2 and 3. request filed with Compensation Board; carbon to accom- this form in instances where the Compensation Board is re- ., 19 THE COMPENSATION BOARD: Request is made for the allo~vancc of the following increased rate of pay effective (date) 1. Name of employee: Mrs. Marian T. Blunt 2. Present rate of compensation 3. Proposed salary 7/1/75-12/3]/75 @ $61;~rl 4. State whether this employee works full or part time: 5. State number of hours this employee works each week 6..Briefly describe the duties of this employee: Account Clerk II 1/1/76-6/30/765 l~l~] ] rP~ rn~ 40 $ 5808.00 6408. $ 6264.00 7. Give length of service of this employee: ~qi.~St~m-rs a. Entrance rate of pay: b. Date and amount of last increase received: Date c. If employee receives additional compensation from city or county state amount: 8. If employee is to replace another, state name and saiary of' former employee: Name ~Amount $ 9. Give reasons for increasing salary of employee or creating new position, as the case may be: To conform to County Pay Plan. Amount $ 468. 7/1/75 - 12/31/75 $6120. 1/1/76 - 6/30/76 6/408. ' Cancel wMch~ef wo~ TEe r_Tid~ of office COUI' Ty Or CHESTERFIELD RENT ~[~ ~l~l~[I Of ~..~Ze, hereinafter called lease, made this lgth day of February 1975 , beaten Larry A. Barthurst lessor, hereinafter ~lled L~dlord, ~d Temple ~arine, Lid. , a V~g~a ~ration lessee, hereinafter ~lled ren~t: and Winfree H. Slater, Incorporated, Agent, hereinafter called Rental Agent. itn sSet : L~dlord, in ~ndderatlon of the rent which Tenant agre~ to pay, doth demise unto Tenant the following property, to-wit: Real property and improvements thereon kno~ as 8911 Midlothian Turnpike Cheslerfield County, Virginia from the lsl dayof May , 1975 , for the term of one (1) year next ensuing, ~ding on the 30th day. o~ April ,19 76 , ~d ~ding therefor in hw- ful money of the United Stat~ of ~eri~ for ~d during said term the total rent of Three Thousand Nine Hundred and --- 00/%00 Do~ ( $3,900.00 ), payable in monthly instalments as follo~: $325.00 with the signing of lhis lease and $325.00 thereafler commencing June 1, 1975. on the 1St clay of each. and ~a~%~t~ in ~V~CE,o ~, to WI~ H. SLATER, INdoRPO~TmD, Agent, (i~ successors or asmgns), at ~~~~(, ~lchmond, Va.,~s ~e~t of Landlord, without demand being made therefor. The premises are to be used for the following purposes, and no other: · u~omm Sailboat Sales, renga~ls, and repairs, and other' business activities incidental br related thereto. It is covenanted and agreed as ~ollows: (a) This lease is subject to Lessee's obtaining a conditional use permit for the .nduct of its businestrom Chesterfield County prior to May 1, 1975. Any repairs, improvements or alterations thai may be required by Chesterfield County for Lessee's occupancy will be performed at the expense of the Lessee~ but if such repairs, improvements, or alterations are impose,~ as a condition to the issuance of such permit Tenant may, at its option,* (b) Lessor agrees that he will negotiate any sale or lease of the property with the Lessee first before it is offered to the public, i.e. Lessor will offer the property for a period of 30 days al the asking rental or asking sales price prior to placing the property on the open market for either. · terminate this lease without penalty, provided written notice of such termination is given to Landlord within ten (10) days after the issuance of said permit. (c) This lease is subject to Lessee's obtaining a permit to construct a sign on the premises adequate in its opinion for the conduct of its proposed business bythe time that the conditional use permit is issued. CONDITION PREMI~Pa~ RENT: OVERLO,LOI~G ASSIGNING: SUBLETTING UTILITY BILI~ INSURANCE 1. Tenant has examined and knows the condition of the premises. No representation has been made to Tenant by Land- lord, Rental Agent, or anyone as to (a) the condition of the premises; (b) any particular use that may be made of them; and (c) the use to which they may be legally put. Neither Landlord nor Rental Agent is under any duty to instruct Tenant, or any one, as to the use of any appliance, machinery or anything on thc premises. 2. Tenant will pay the rent. Tenant will not overload the building. $. Tenant will not permit the premises to be occupied in whole or in part by any person other than Tenant; will not, with- out the Landlord's written consent, assign or sublet the premises or any par/thereof. Acceptance oI rerlt by Landlord or Rental Agent trom a person other than Tenant shall not constitute consent to an assignment or subletting. 4. Tenant will pay, when due, all bills for gas, water, electricity, telephone and other public utilities used on or charged against the premises. 5. Tenant will pay all excess insurance premiums (i.e., premiums in excess of the usual premiums for a non-hazardous risk) required to be paid by Landlord on any buildings on the premises by reason of Tenant's use or occupancy thereof. 6. Should Tenant receive any notice as to any tax or assessement for local improvements affecting the premises, he will promptly show the notice to Landlord or Rental Agent, and any damage caused Landlord by Tenant's failure to do so shall be paid by Tenant. HOLIDAYS PREMISES PRONOUN~t HEADINGS CONSTRUCTION FINAL WRITL~I duly authorized agent or officer. T~C~ereo~ durlug the ter~ of this lea~e. to such Commission which is hereby made a lien on said premises and has hereinbefore been further secured by providing for the payment of rent to Rental Agent and which, in the event of any such renewal, extension or new lease, shall be still further secured by providing therein for the payment of rent to Rental Agent. Rental Agent shall use its best efforts to collect rent so that the said commission may be paid in installments on the installments of rent as received, and retained by Rental Agent be- fore remitting installments of rent (less installments of commissions); but if any attempt shall be made to deprive Rental Agent of its rights to collect rent, then the whole amount of the commission then unpaid shall, at Rental Agent's option, immediately become due and payable. 20. The Landlord hereby authorizes Rental Agent to institute legal proceedings for the recovery of any rent under this lease, or any renewal or extension thereof/and to employ an attorney for that purpose, and to charge all costs and fees to the Landlord, including a charge of Five Dollars ($5.00) by Rental Agent, for its services in that behalf. 21. Al1 rights and liabilities herein given to or imposed upon any party hereto shall extend to the heirs, executors, ad- ministrators, successors, and, so far as same are not unassignable by the terms hereof, to the assigns of such party. 22. In connection with any act done or suffered by Rental Agent concerning the premises, the Landlord further agrees to save Rental Agent harmless from all fines, judgments, suits, claims, demands, and actions of any kind, and from liability for in- jury suffered by an employee or contractor engaged by the Rental Agent for the benefit of th'e Landlord, not in the permanent employ of said Rental Agent, and from liability for injury or damage to any person whomsoever. 23. If the day on which rent is payable falls on a Sunday or on a holiday made legal by the statutes of V. irginia, it shall be payable on the following secular day. 24. Wherever the word "premises" is used, it means premises .hereby leased. :25. Feminine and neuter pronouns ,hall be substituted for masculine, and plural for singular, wherever the context so requires. 26. Paragraph headings are mere catchwords to indicate the contents of the paragraphs, and are not to be used in con. struing thL, lease. 27. This lease shall be construed in accordance with the laws and statutes of Virginia. 28. This lease represents the final understanding between Landlord, Tenant and Rental Agent, and cannot be changed or modified by anyone except by writing signed by Landlord, ~I~enant and Rental Agent.and endorsed hereon or attached hereto. 29. Larry A. BarChurst, by executing this Iea~e, warrants thac he 1~ the ~ole owner of the premises herein demised, anR that Tenant shall have quiet enjoyment* IN WITNESS VffHEREOF, each {ndivMual party hereto has hereunto signed his or her name and affixed his or htr scaJ, and each corporate party hereto other than Rental A~cnt has caused ~ts name to be s~ncd and {~s sca] to be affixed by its duly authorizcd officers, and Rental Agent .has hereunto caused its name to be signed by its u Landlord Larry A. Barthurst Atte si: (Seal) Audrey A.' ~rnple Secretary ........................................................................................................ (SEAL) Landlord Tenant T ant J~an rem~eT~resident WINFREE H. gLArER. INCORPORATED (Rental Agent~ STATE OF ~ to-wit: OF of , do certify that is/are signed to the writing above, bearing date on the the same before me in my aforesaid. My term of office expires on the day of Given under my hand this day of , a Notary Public for the day of ,19 ,19 , 19 aforesaid in the State , whose name(s) , has/have acknowledged STATE OF OF to-wit: N*tary Public that whose names as r~pectively of . are signed to the writing above, bearing date on the acknowledged the same before me in my , a Notary Public in and for the State and aforesaid, do certify and and day of , 19 , have each aforesaid, and after being duly sworn each of said officers made oath before me that they are authorized to execute the writing for and on behalf of said corporation. My term of office expires on the day of , 19 Given under my hand this day of ", 19 Notary Public ~A~LAGE~, REPAIRI/t-- ALTERA~'ION8 DF~TRUCTION OF BUILDING NOTICE TERMINATION HOLDING O~ SURRENDErING PLACARDING SIIOWING REMEDIF_~ TaR T~NANT°~ BREACH BALE TO T]C/~TANT damage, personal or properS, to Tenant, ~o any occupant of the premises, or to aayone, occasioned by or resulting from elec- trlci~, toilets, breakage or leakage of water, gas or other pipes or of roofs or rain conduits or other leakage or over/tow or any other cause or for any carelessness, negligence or improper condua of Tenant or Tenant's agent, on, in or about the premises, the sidewalk in leant'of the .amc or any place contiguous to the premises~ and neither Landlord nor Rental Agent shall be liable for any da,nages, loss or injury to the person or property of Tenant or any other person suffered on, in or about the presfises or contiguou~ thereto by reason of any present or future latent or other defects ia the prernlses,} t~COpg a~ r;*~y b~ 10. Tenan~ will comply ~hh all lawful requlrcmcnts o[ the Iaea] and state health board~, police ~nd fire dcparnncnts, munlcipa], state and federal au~horltles, and the board of fire underwrkers, respecting the use of the premises; and will ar expense in,tall all roilct~ that may be required, and do any work, except alterations and ~mprovemcnt~ of a structurM nature (includiag roof repairs), which may be ordered by lawful autl~ori~, but ii Tenant, after notice ordering the work~ tail~ to do wlth reasonable prompmess, Landlord, ~hhou~ notice to Tenant, may do it and collect the cost from Tenant. II Landlord i2 re- quired to abate any nuisance on the prcmlse~, he may do ~o without notice to Tenant and Tenant will pay all costs. Tenant wil~ kccp and mMn~ain thc prcmlscs in good repair and condhlon~ keep ia g~ running order the heating rcm, e]ec~rlc wiring, toilets, w~tcr pipes, water, gas and electric fixtures; replace all locks, trhnnfings, glass and plate glass broken during tenancy, regardless of the manner in which same may have bccn broken; unstop all water fixtures fl~at may become choked ~d repair all water pipes and plumbing that may burst If flu:re be any a~r condlrionlng cqulpmcnt, elevah~rs, lifts, machinery or appliances on thc prcmlscs, Tenant will care for, mah~tain, and repair same, will be responsible for billty or clMms ior damages for injuries to persons and property therefrom, and will maintMn, at his own cost for Land- lord's benefit, insurance against injuries thercfl~om to any person or property in an amount satisfactory to Landlord, but not for less than TWENTY THOUSAND DOLLARS. Tenant will not make any altcr~tions o[, additions to or changes in thc premises including improvements, except niter first having tl~e writte~ consent of the Rental Agent or Landlord, and all alterations, changes, and improvements, by whoms~ver made, shall be the property of Landlord. Nnthing contained in tiffs paragraph s~all be construed as rcquiring L~ndlo~ to make any repairs, except alterations and improvements of a struc- tural nature ordered as hcreinabove in this, paragraph 10, set /orth. 11. If, without fauk or negllgcncc of Tenant, thc buiIdings au the premises are, in whole or in part, destroyed by fire or otherwise, or condemned by public authorities, whefl~er by eminc~i domain or otherwise, then, (1) if wholly destroyed or con- demned ~o that all of the buildings on the premhe~ are rendered untenantabIc, thi~ lca~e Shall then terminate, and Tenant shall be liable /or thc rent only up t9 the time of such destruction or condc,matlon, but (2) if only partJaIly destroyed or condemned, and ~till tenantable, Landlord shall, within a reasonable time, repair ~ald building or buildings with a reasonable reduction the rent from the tbne of such partial destruction or condemnation until tl~ere be again on the premises bnildlngs of as much value to Tcnan~ as thc buildings partially destroyed or condemned; provided, however~ that if such partial de~ructlon or condemnation ,hall occur within six month~ prior to ~hc termination o~ this lease, this lease, if Landlord ~o elects, shall rhea terminate and Tenant shah be liable for rent only up to the time of ~uch destruction or condcmnatlon. Tenant zhal] give imm~dlate written notice oi znch destruction or condemnation, whole or partial, to .Landlord or Rental Agent. 12. Any notice permitted or required by (h;s lease may be served by any sheriff; ~ergean~ or constable in h~s cou~ or his city, and,'in addition, i~ such notice is given by Landlord or Rental Agent, it may be given by p'ostlng not,cc on thc premises or by mailing the notice by registered mall, addressed to Tenant, at the premhcs, and, ff the notice js to be given by Tenant, he m~y also give notice by mailing the notic~ by registered mail, w Rental Agent at its address herein given. 13. A written notice of at least THREE MONTHS Prior.to th*e termination 'of this lease of the intention of Tenant to vacate the premises shall be given by Tenant to Landlord or Rental Agent should Tenant desire to vacate and should Landlord desire possession, a written notice of at least THREE MONTHS prior to the termination of this lease shall be given by Landlord or Rental Ageng to Tenant of such desire. 14.~ If notice is given as set forth in paragraph 13, no holding over by Tenant, nor acceptance of rent by Landlord or Rental Agent, shall operate as a renewal or extension of the ease Wltl~out the written consent of Landlord, but in the event no such notice is glven, then this lease shall contlnne in force from year to year, at the last-named rental and subject to all the other pro- visions of this lc'ese, except those obligations, if any, herein' set forth, of Landlord to make alterations or repairs. If Tenant holds over or remains in possessiop or occupancy of the premises after the expiration of the term, or after any sooner termina- tion thereOf, his occupanc'y ahalI be illegal, but, nevertheless, Tenant shall be liable to Landlord~ sq long as Tenant, or any of his property, remain~ on the premises, for the la~t-named monthly rental for each month, or any part thereof and also for arty damages sustained by Landlord by such action by Tenant. 15. Tenant will leave the premises in good repair, and, upon surrender of possession, will have ali rubbish removed, the premises thoroughly cleaned, and deliver to Landlord all keys to the premises, or pay to Landlord the actual cost thereof. 16. Afte~such written notice aa set forthln paragraph numbered 13 has been given, Tenant will permit Landlord or Rental Agent t6 placard the~ premises for rent or for sale in one or more eonsplcuous places on the plate glass wlndo;vs and else- where. Tenant will allow Rental Agent, Landlord or agents, to show the premises, exterior and interior, to any person at any time during business hours during this lease or any extension or renewal thereof. 17. Except by sale in the usual course of trade, Tenant wilt not remove furniture, fixtures and property from the premises without first obtaining the written consent of Landlord and in addition to all of the~ otber remedies provided by law, Landlord shall haves llen against al property on the premhe~,insurance if any, collected therefor, and propertyln the custody of the law, as security for the payment of the rent, and default in obligations hereunder. In case of non-payment of rent or default by Tenant in the performance of any of the obligations of this lea se, Landlord shall have the right, without affecting any othe'r right or additional remedies given under this lease or hy law, ~o sell the personal property, or any part thereof, after ten (10) days written notice to Tenant, at public or private sale and apply the net proceeds, after payment of costs and attorney's fees and other expenses of such sale, ~0 the payment of rent and damagea for said default, paying the surplus, if any, to Tenant. :In addhlon to other remedies provided by law, anti by tbis lease, the Landlord may re-enter for default of five day~ in the payment of rent, or for breach of any obligation contained in this lease. Any re-entry by Landlord may be made without any actual demand being made upon Tenant for rent, or anything else, or without notice given to Tenant, and such re-entry 'shall not prejudice Lamtlord's right to recover all rent accrned or ~add'payable a~' heYe/n provided. Any statute, ordinance or custom calling for notice or for service of process in any other manner thau set forth in this lease~ is bereby waived. Upon the breach of any covenant or undertaking of Tenant herein contained, or upon the failure of Tenant to move into the premises at the beginning of the term, or upon the vacation or abandonment of the premises, or upon the repudiation of this lease by any person then or formerly holding uvder this lease, or the appointment of a fiduciary (other than personal representa- tive), Receiver or trustee of such person or of such person's property or upon the filing of dissolution (if a corporation), bank- ruptcy or insolvency proceedings by 'or against such person, the total rent, whether accrued or not, shall immediately be payable, and Landlord shall have the right to enter the premises, including the right to remove all persons and things, by force or other- w~se, without being liabl'e to any prosecution or damages therefor, to distrain for rent, to recover ~ossess~oa~of the premises, and such damages as Landlord has sustained by reason of the unlawful entry or unlawful detention of the premises by Tenant, and, without any notice to Tenant, Landlord may re-rent for the accmmt of Tenant the premises for the unexph'ed portion the teton; or Landlord may, at his option, immediately terminate the lease, but Landlord's terminating the lea~e, or recovering possession of the premises or the re-renting shall not deprive Landlord of any other action m' remedz ~rovided bv law or by this lease against Tenant for possessibn, for rent, and for damages. ~'~~~~ Ali items of indebtedness or damage which may become due to Landlord by Tenant shall be considered rent, and Landlord shaI1 have the same liens and remedies for the collection thereof as provided herein and by law for their collection. Tenant will pay Landlord and Rental Agent respectively all expendlture~ incurred by them in enforcing the provisions of this lease, including reasonable fees of attorneys and others employed by Landlord or Rental Agent. If Landlord, or Rental Agent, or Tenant fails to insist on the strict abater'anco by the other of any provision of the lease, he shall thereby neither be precluded from enforcing nor be held to have waived any o~ the obligations~ past, present and future, of this lease. 18. Landlord agrees with and for the benefit of Rental Agent as a covenant running with the land, that if Tenant, his successors or assigns (including such person in which Tenant, his successors or assigns, may have an interest as stockholder. lender of money or otherwise), shall, at any time during either the term of this lease, or any renewal or extension thereof, or any new lease of the premises between any person and Tenant, his successors or assigns (including such person in which Tenant, his successors or assigns, may have an interest as stockholder, lender of money or otherwise), purchase the premises, then consideration of Rental Agent's consummatixg this lease, Rental Agent shall receive, on the date the premises are transferred, a sales cmnmission of six per centare (6%) of gross sales pakl. Such commission is in addition to what is provided in para- eraph nmnber 19 and is hereby made a lien on the premises. COMMIIS~IONI~ 19. In consideration of Rental Agent's services in procurin;~ this lease and as a covenant rtmnlng with the land, the' Land- lord covenants with, and for the benefit of the Rental Agent, as foUows:~Rental Agent is to receive a commission of six per centare (6%) of the rent during the term of this lease, and any renewal or extension thereof or any new lease of the premises between any person and Tenant, bis successors or assigns (including such person in which Tenant, his successors or assigns, may have an torts[ a~ ~tockbolder, par~ner, lender nf money or otherwise); a.d no sale, transfer~ ~s~nlnel~{, cancellation .r release (in,*h, di~ IF TgNANT ASSIGNS TI{IS LEASE OR SUBLEASI£S THE PREMISI~S, RENTAl, Ar;I*;N'T WIIA, Ct. IARC, F, A FP;E OF ~0OX $50.00 Landlord and Tenant hereby agree that Tenant may sublease the premi.,e$, or any part thereof, at the ~tme or a dit~erent rental, to , as sub-Tenant ~o long as sub-Tenant doe~ not u~e the premi:e$ for purpos~ other than ~et forth in the lease, but Tenant shall continue liable to Landlord ~or all the covenants and agreements contained in the lease. Given under our hand, and seals this day of , 19 .................................................................... Tenant ..{SEAL) La#dlord 0 r- {a O '13 N ,.r -r 0 :~ z 0 m z ..;) Tenant hereby assigns aa o~ the day of , 19 , the lease to · Until the expiration of the lease Tenant will continue liable ~or payment of rent and the performance of all the provisions of this lease, and waiv~ the requirement, if any, of any notice by assignee, Landlord or Rental Agent of assignee's failure to perform any obligations of this lease. Wx~z~as.q my hand and seal this day of , 19 ...................................................................................... (SEAL) T~nant ~is assignee as above, and having read the lease, Iagree to carry out all it~ provisions. Given under my hand and seal this day of , 19 ................................................ ~ ............. ~:..i ................................ (s~.A~.) /lssitlnee I consent to the above assignment on the conditions above stated. Given under my hand and seal this day of , 19 ......................................................................................... (SEAL) Landlord In consideration of Landlord agreeing to lease to Tenant the premises, the undersigned, ~xl~tc0memmtamma~imm:q~xx~l~h/~rtemeg jointly md severally if there be more than one under- signed, ~ar=tee ~e pa~ent o} rent and the ~rformance of all the provisions of this le~ by Ten~t, his succors and ~igns, =d agree that the mere non-pa~ent o} rent and non-performance of said provisions by the Tenant or succe~ors and ~igns shall create ~ immediate llabili~ on the part of the unde~i~ed m the Landlord ~d his successo~ and ~i~s and to Rent~ Agent. Landlord ~d Rental Agent need not flint exhaust their legal remedies against Tenant or his successors and a~igns before preceding against the undenigned. Neither L~dlord nor Rental Agent is required to notify the undersigned or Tenant of Tenant's f~lure to pay rent or perform as a~oresaid. Wx~ss our h~ds ~d seals: . " 'l'e . e Audrey A. T~ple /~- ~ ...................................................................................... f.~t~ uz N ~ 21 February 1975 Attachment to Application to the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors or Board of Zoning Appeals for a Conditional Use Pormit. I hereby request approval for the use of signs in accordance with zoning regulations for B-3 business as a part of a permit for conditional use of the property in question. very truly yours Julian Temple PcLB 15 F 75S05~ Conditional Use Scale 1" = 600' Sheet 21 M April 23, 1975 (B.S.) CASE NUMBER: 75S047 APPLICANT: ~homas L. Daniel P~QUEST: A Conditional Use to permit the operation of a Truck Terminal. PROPOSED USE: 5he parking of trucks on a vacant parcel. TAX MAP IDENTIFICATIC~: Clover Hill Magisterial District, Tax Map Section 40-2 (1) 12 (Sheet 15). GENERAL LOCATI@~: Fronting the east line of Turner Road north of the intersection of Turner and Walmsley Blvd., in.the vicinty of the Walmsley-Goodes Bridge Road Intersection. ~CHEA~ (SUBJECT PARCEL): Approximately .6 acres. EXISTD~G LAh~ USE (SUBJECT PARC~L): 5his parcel is presently being used for the parking of trucks. TF~NSPOK~ATION k~\~D TRAFFIC: Accesses to the parcel is by means of Turner Road. GENERAL PLAN: Commercial development of the area encompassing the parcel. STAFF ANALYSIS ~l~ RECOFMENDATIONS: As noted above, trucks are now being parked on the parcel. In discussing the request with the applicant, Staff has ascertained that the parkirg of these vehicles at this location would be temporary. A trucking terminal is not ultimate intended use of the parcel. Planning Staff would be opposed to a permanent trucking terminal location because such a use places a heavy demand on area traffic and would be located too close to the intersecticn of Walmsley Blvd. and Turner Road. Such a situation could only result in further traffic congestion in this area. In addition, it is felt that such a use is not in keeping with the type of development that is desired in this area. However, since the applicant has indicated that the parking of these vehicles would only be for a short period of time, Staff feels that the request can be acconmodated without causing harm to either adjacent property or the surrounding neiEbborhood. CASE HISTORY AND PAST COMMISSION AND BOARD ACTION FOR THIS REQUEST C.P.C._3 __18 75: Recommend that this request be approved only if the following conditions are imposed: 1. This Conditional Use shall be granted for a period of time not to exceed a tOtal of six months calculated from the date of approval. (over) 2. No signs shall be permitted. 3. No permanent structures, either directly or indirectly involved in this operation shall be permitted. 4. No more %hah a total of twelve (12) trucks shall be permitted to be parked on the parcel. 5. No trucks shall be parked within fifty (50) feet of Turner Road. -2- C \ % R-T~ Scale: 75s047 <R) Conditional Use Scale 1"=600' Sheet 15 R-7 to B-3 1"=600 ' COMPLAINT ORDINANCE VIOLATION SUMMARY SHEET _Fh4u,,.t~ ,~,~,, ~,,~,~ ,~q .... DATE: Complainant: Mailing Address LOCATION: Street Address Magisterial District Tax Map Sec. ..... Lot, Blk., & Sec. PROPERTY OWNER: Name Date ~ I/s'-17,<' ! ' PHONE: OFFICE 276-783.~ NIGHT-HOLIDAYS 272-2946 RICHMOND, VIRGINIA 23235 .bnua~ 24, Mr. Mtcheel Ptmnlnli ~leld Co~mty Ceue Ham Chmlerfleld Courtly, Vlrgll~te Ret Cemllf~l U=e Petals Tmner ~. & Walm!ey ~t~t. Dear Mr, Kltz: As mqut~ by Section 21-I of fhe Chesfeftetd Cemty Ordlmce, we Imeby ncke application fer a Cond!flonal U~e Pefatt fo alle~ epFfm(~ly ell~t fo fen traa~ vehlcles fo pad( on pmpeW zoned Ni-I on the ee~ slde of Turner ~i ce W, almdey Boulevard This pmpesty ts temper~lly lea~cl te Kenan, Ir.:. · Cemll~ CeaFmy d~e Is new locating a bonch In Rlcbnend, Virginia, hepefutly In CheeN~,eld If we can en'e~e fe~ satisfactory facilities, very truly, TEAVIS IIEAL~ COMPANY J PHONE= OFFICE 276-781~ NIGHT-HOLIDAYS 272-2946 REPRESENTING 360WESTS HOPPING CENTER ROUTE36OWEST & TURNER ROAD CHIPPENHAM MALL ROLFFE360WEST& CHIPPENHAM PARKWAY BUFDRO SHOPPING CENTER ROUTE 60 WEST (NR) BUFORO ROAD SOUTHAMPTON S~;OPPING CENTER FOREST HILL AVENUE & WESTHAM ROAD HUGUENOT VILLAGE ROUTE 147 & ROBIOUS ROAD MEADOWDALE SHOPPING CENTER CHippENHAM PARKWAY & HOPKINS ROAD THE LEA BUILDING 180EASTBELT BOULEVARD MANCHESTER TOWNHOUSES CHIPPENHAM PARKWAY & MANDALAY DRIVE ~ERL~F~U~EA~S. CHIP~NH~ PARKWAYBETWEEN INTERPORT SOUTH TOWNHOUSE WA[~EHOUSE$ TURNER ROAD NEAR RT. 3~0 LEMON TREE SHOPPING CENTER RT, 60 & TURNER ROAD 360 W~EST SHOPP! NG CENTER 7148 HULL STREET ROAD RICHMOND, VIRGINIA 23235 January 24, ]975 Mr. Michael Ritz Planning Commission Chesterfield County Court House Chesterfield County, Virginia 23832 Re .- Conditional Use Permit M-1 Property Turner Rd. & Walmsley Blvd. Dear Mr. Ritz: As required by Section 21-1 of the ChesterField County Ordiance, we hereby make application for a Conditional Use Permit to allow approximately eight to ten transport vehicles to park on property zoned M-1 on the east side of Turner Road at Walmsley Boulevard This property is temporarily leased to Kenan, inc. a Carolina Company who is now locating a branch in Richmond, Virginia, hopefully in Chesterfield if we can arrange for satisfactory facilities. Yours very truly, REALTY COMPANY PLTir:iw Enclosure cc: I. G. Homer, O. D. Rudy, Kenan Transport, Inc., James M. Schiavo BOARD OF SUPERVISORS IRVING. HORNER, CHAIRMAN CLOVER HILL DIRTRH~' LEO MYERS, vici CHAIRMAN BERMUDA DISTRICT BOARD OF SUPERVISORS i J. RUFFIN APPERSON ALDRICH E. MERLIN O'NEILL, SR. COUNTY OF CH ESTERFI. E,_ LD C'HESTERFI£LD. VIRGINIA Mr. P. L. Travis, Jr. Tra~is Realty Company 7148 Hull Street Road Richmond, VA 23235 Re: Conditional Use M-1 Property Turner Road & Walmsley Blvd. Dear Mr. Travis: Section 21-3 (3) of the Chesterfield County Ordinance is the applicable section of the ordinance in applying for a Conditonal Use to permit the parking of transport vehicles on property in Light Industrial (M-i) District. Your application should read; a Conditional Use to permit the operation of a Truck Terminal in a Light Industrial (M-i) District. Your application as submitted is incomplete in that you did not list the adjacent property owners, of subject,~ropert~ and a detailed '±'here must Be two com' s. Maps for each) Sincerely, Chesteen L. Smith Chesterfield County Planning Department CLS.s Enclosure: Two applications CASE HISTORY AND PAST CO~94ISSION AND BOARD ACTION FOR THIS REQUEST C.P.C. 3 18 75: Approval of this request is recommended only if the following conditions are imposed: 1. Prior to the continuance of the operation the Planning office shall be presented with written proof of the following: a. that the operator of the turkey shoot has. obtained, or~ is in the process of applying for a business license, as speci- fied ih Section 5.56 of the County Code. b. that clearance from the Chesterfield Police Department relative to Section 7-11 of the County Code has been obtained. c. that the Police Department has certified that this opera- tion will not violate State and County Weapons Discharge Ordinances as would be applicable under Section 33.1-349 and Section 7-32 of the Acts of Virginia and Chesterfield County Code. d. a clearance from the County Health Department that the operation does not violate State Food and Drink Regulations and that proper facilities for the disposal of human waste are provided for as approved. 2. This permit shall be valid for a period of two year~ subject to review by tke Board upon re-application for reneWal. 3. Hours of operation shall be restricted to between 9:00 A.M. and 7:00 P.M., Monday through Thursday and between 1:00 P.M. and 11:00 P.M. on Friday and Saturday. No Sunday operation shall be permitted. 4. The use of firearms shall be limited to shot guns only. 5. The use of alcoholic beverages shall be prohibited. 6. All parking areas and driveways shall be adequately graded - and either paved or gravelled. 7. Parking spaces shall be provided at a ratio of one space for every two participants. 8. Each space shall be 10 ft. x 20 ft. in size. 9. All driveways and entrances shall be at least 25 ft. in width. 10. Any and all abandoned automobiles, parts thereof and other debris shall be removed from the premises prior to the continuance of this operation. 11. All site, layout and landscaping plans shall be submitted to and approved by the County Planning Department prior to the issuance of any building permit, subject to the provisions established by and set forth in Article 25, Chapter 17 of the County Code. ~ -2- April 23, 1975 (B.S.) March- 18~-t9~~- CASE NUMBER: 75SO48 APPLICANT: C. J. Hubbard REQUEST: A Conditional Use to permit the continued operation of a Turkey Shoot. PROPOSED USE: Turkey Shoot. TAX MAP IDENTIFICATION: Clover Hill Magisterial District; Tax Map Section 49-3 (1) 2 (Sheet 14). GENERAL LOCATION: The parcel in question fronts the west line of Courthouse Road and is situated north of the intersection of Courthouse Road and Route 360. ACREAGE (SUBJECT PARCEL): Approximately 10 acres. EXISTING ZONING: Agricultural (A). EXISTING LAND USE (SUBJECT PARCEL):' One single family residence, various outbuildings and an area and structure being used by the turkey shoot operation. ADJACENT AND AREA ZONING IN LAND USE: All adjacent property is zoned agricultural and is either occupied by.single family dwellings or is vacant and undeveloped. TRANSPORTATION AND TRAFFIC: The existing turkey shoot operation is served by a dirt road which also serves the residence located on the parcel. GENERAL PLAN: Single family residential development of the area encompassing the parcel in question. STAFF ANALYSIS AND RECOMMENDATION: On February 7, !973 the Board of Zoning Appeals considered a request by the applicant to permit the operation of a turkey shoot on the subject parcel. Upon considering thi~ request the Board approved the application sub- ject to the imposition of a number of conditions which govern this business. Among these conditions was a requirement that the 'continued operation of the turkey shoot be renewed at the end of two years. This being the case the applicant is now re- questing a Conditional Use to permit the continued operation. Planning Staff after review of the renewal application, and.after inspection of the site, is of the opinion that permitting the turkey shoot to continue should offer no detriment to the adjacent properties at this time. However, it should be noted that the general area is beginning to develop quite rapidly and the appli- cant should be put on notice that further renewals of this request might not be appropriate in light of increasing residential densities. (over) .ROCKWOOD PARK Scale 75SO48 Conditional Use 1"=600' Sheet COLONEL E. P. GILL CHIEF OF POLICE W. E. MARTIN CAPTAIN OF POLICE COU NTY OF CHESTERFIELD C'HESTERFIELD, VIRGINIA POLICE DEPARTMENT March 3, 1975 Mr. Jim Shrivo County Planning Office Chesterfield, Virginia Re: Turkey Shoot Mr. C. J. Hubbard 2900 Courthouse Road Dear Jim: Mr. Hubbard called me the other day in reference to his conversation with y~u in regards to the Turkey Shoot. He stated that his license is running out March 1, 1975, and that you advised him that he would need the Police Department to check into this again. Please be advised that I have checked the situation, and there is no traffic problem here nor any safety problem with his shoot. The situation seems to be the same as when he applied in 1973 for his license then. I would, therefore, recommend that the application be renewed. Respectfully, Detective Sergeant Mason T. Chalkley Special Assistant to Chief of Police MTC:vlh o State the reason for this request: We wish to build a house large enough to house my family and my wifes parents. My mother-in-law has a heart condition, having recently had a pacemaker installed, and as my wife is a graduate nurse we wish to be in the same house so that my mother-in-law can always have assistance in ?ase of an emergency. April 23, 1975 (B.S.) April 16, 1975 (Applicant) CASE ~JMBLR: 75S049 APPLICANT: James A. Morrison REQUEST: A conditional Use to pern~t the construction ora two family dwelling. PROPOSED L~E: ~he applicant desires to provide separate living quarters for his ~fe's parents. TAX MAP II~.,~FICATION: Midlothian Magisterial District, refer to Bon Air Manor, Block B, Lot 5 (Sheet 8). GENERAL LOCATION: Northwest quadrant of the intersection of Kennerly and Brown Roads ir, Bon Air Manor Subdivision. (SUBJECT PARCEL): Approximately 1 acre. EXISTLNG ZO~fING: Residential (R-15). EXISTI]~;G I~A~D USE (SUBJECT PARCEL): Vacant and wooded. ADJAC~.~1 A~,'rD .AREA ZONING AND LAND L~E: Adjacent property to the south, northwest, southeast and southwest is zoned Residential (R-15) while property to the north- east is zoned Residential (R-7). The majority of adjacent property is occupied by single family dwellings with the exception of property to the south and west which remains vacant and wooded. TRANSPOMr;~ION AND TRAFFIC: A semi-circul~ driveway will serve the residential structure to be erected on the parcel in question. No adverse impact with regard to the proposed access is anticipated. GENERAL PLAN: Single family residential development for the area encompassing the parcel in question. ST~3F ANALYSIS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: The applicant has indicated that it is his intent to construct his home on the parcel in question. It is also his desire that the dwel]ing incorporat~ additional living space to provide a hom~ for his wife's parents. It is stated in the application that his mother-in-/aw has a heart condition and desires to be near her daughter who is a trained nurse and can offer assistance in case of emergency. The applicant has presented a site plau and rendering, with the application which depicts the hoUSe to be erected on the parcel. After reviewing the p]an submitted, Staff is of the opinion that the type of dwelling to be erected is very attractive, and will certainly be in keeping with the residences in the area. ~he design of the structure does not present the USual appearance one nor~e_lly associates with duplex living. (over) CASE HISTORY AND P~ST CO~.~ISSION AND BOARD ~CTION FOR THIS REQUEST C.P.C. 3 18 75: Approval of this request is recommended, subject to the following conditions being imposed: 1. This condition use shall be granted to and for James A. Morrison and shall not run with the land. 2. The structure to be erected on the parcel shall be designed and have an appearance as reflected in the plans and rendering submitted with the application. 3. At no time, sh~ll either of the dwelling units be rented. 4. The driveway and parking area, as depicted on the site plan, shall either be paved or gravelled. Applicant 4 16 75: Requested that this case be withdrawn. -2- IISIII 19 75S0~9 Conditional Use Scale 1"=600, Sheet 8 Planning Department Chesterfield County Chesterfield, Virginia April 16, 1975 23832 Attention: Mr. Stan Balderson, Jr.,Chief Planner Reference: Request for Conditional Use Permit # 75S049 Gentlemen: This is to notify you that we wish to withdraw our request for a conditional use permit for the construction of a two-family dwelling on Block B, Lot 5, Bom Air Manor. Very truly~rs, James A. Morrison 5257 Pinecrest Avenue Richmond, Virginia 23225 JAM/ods ! I Ii Ill ii I ii II ! ii II iI II i \ I II Conditional Scale 1:= gOO' Use Sheet April 23, 1975 (B.S.) Mar ck--1~87--t9~ (P.C. ~ CASE NUMBER: 75SO46 APPLICANt: Maryland Coal and Coke Company REQUEST: A COnditional USe to permit an office building to be operated from an existing single family structure. PROPOSED USE: Office Building. TAX MAP IDENTIFICATION: Midlothian Magisterial District; Tax Map Section 23 (1) Parcels 4 & 6 (Sheet 5). GENERAL LOCATION: The west line of Hallsboro Road north of the intersection of Mt. Herman Road. ACREAGE (SUBJECT P .ARCEL): 5.70 acres. EXISTING ZONING: Agricultural (A). EXISTING LAND USE (SUBJECT PARCEL): The parcel is vacant with the exception of a one story brick single family residence (to be used as the proposed office). The majority of the parcel is wooded. ADJACENT AND AREA ZONING AND LAND USE: Ail adjacent property is zoned Agricultural (A) and is "either being used for agricultural purposes or remains vacant and wooded. TRANSPORTATION AND TRAFFIC: Access to the parcel will be provided by means of a dirt driveway leading to Hallsboro Road. GENERAL PLAN: Vacant/Agricultural use for the area encompassing the parcel. STAFF ANALYSIS AND REcoMMENDATIONS: The applicant has reasonably extensive operations in and around the County of Chesterfield. A large majority of th~ employees of this company live in the area of the request, and it is the desire of the applicant to locate its general corporate offices in this vicinity. It is intended that no other use be made of the parcel other than the offices as indicated. It is also noted that it is not intended to change the exterior appearance of the existing residence. CASE HISTORY AND PAST COMMISSION AND BOARD ACTION FOR THIS REQUEST C.P.C. 3 18 75: Approval, subject to the following conditions: 1. The existing dirt driveway which serves the parcel shall either be paved or gravelled. (over) 2. Parking spaces as required by this use shall be provided and shall be either paved or gravelled. 3. No exterior storage of any materials, tools, equipment or supplies, shall be permitted. This Conditional Use shall be grmnted to and for Maryland Coal and Coke Company exclusively. 4. Only one sign, having an area of not less than two square feet identifying the company's headquarters shall be permitted. A plan for the location and design of this sign shall be sub- mitted to and approved by the Planning Department prior to occu- pancy. 5. No addition to the existing building nor any additional buildings shall be permitted. -2- PROP~.~Y O,~,ER S NAME: MAiLI?[$ ADDP,~ESS: TAX r~AP NO.: LOT or PARCEL: SUBD. NAME: ELOCK: SECTION: F) PROPERTY OWNER'S NAME: ?L%ILING ADDRESS: TAX MAP NO.: LOT or PARCEL: SUBD. NAME: BLOCK: SECTION: s) PROPERTY OWNER'S NAME: MAILING ADDRESS: TAX ~,~P NO.: LOT or PARCEL: SUBD. NAME: BLOCK: SECTION: H) I) PROPERTY OWNER'S NA~YE: I~D. ILING ADDRESS: TAX MAP NO.: LOT or PARCEL: PROPERTY OWNER'S NAME: MAILING ADDRESS: TAX MAP NO.: LOT or PARCEL: SUBD. NAME: BLOCK: SECTION: SUBD. NAME' BLOCK: SECTION: J) K) PROPERTY OWNER'S NAME: ~ILIN~ ADDRESS: TAX I~P NO.: LOT or PARCEL: PROPERTY OWNER'S NAME: MAILING ADDRESS: TAX MAP NO.: LOT or PARCEL: SUBD. NAME: BLOCK: SECTION: SUBD. NAME: BLOCK: SECTION: L) PROPERTY OWNER'S NAME: MAILING ADDRESS: TAX MAP NO.: LOT or PARCEL: SUBD NAP~: BLOCK: SECTION: PROPERTY OWNER'S NAME: MAILING ADDRESS: TAX MAP NO.: LOT or PARCEL: SUnD. NAME: BLOCK: SECTION: PROPERTY OWNER'S NAME: MAILING ADDRESS: TAX MAP NO.: LOT or PARCEL: SUBD. NAME: BLOCK: SECTION: FOR ADDITIONAL SPACE USE THE BACK OF PAGES 2 & 3 -3- ].2) 13) THE APPLICANT HEREWITH DEPOSITS '~'~ · H~ ~'~,E REQUIRED. IS A% aILABL.~ '~" ~ THE PLa:.~:~Ir~O D~PARTMENT~ ROOH 307. CHECK OR MONEY ORDER MUST BE MADE PAYABLE TO: A FEE SCHEDULE TREASURER~ COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD ENCLOSE WITH THIS APPLICATION EITHER THE APPROPRIATE COUNTY TAX ~P OR A SURVEYED PLAT OF THE ENTIRE PARCEL. ENCLOSE WITH THIS APPLICATION ANY PERTINENT SITE PLANS OR TENTATIVE PLATS. NOTE: INCOMPLETE APPLICATIONS MAY DELAY THE SCHEDULING OF REQUESTS. l~) February ~ SIGNATURE oF AOENT ~(Name of De,son othe~ than~ bug actlng ~o~ the applicant, filling out ail o~ a pa~ o£ this apptl- I/WE -EREBY DEPOSE AND SAY THAT ALL OF THE ABOVE STf2TE~'~TS AR'I) THE STATE3~NTS CONTAINED IN ANY EXHIBITS TRANSMITTED ARE TRUE: MARYLAND COAL & COKE COMPANY BYi~ '" //'/ ...... '/ ~PreJident "SIGNATURE OF" APPLICANT " (Same name as used in Item 2-A, Page 1) ,197P · .,SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS?~~, DAY OF MY COMMISSION EXPtRES~, co~:~o= ~ma~ N:v~.~ ~o ~ 19 NOTARY -4- PLANNING D~£ARTMENT CHESTERFIELD COUNTY Chesterfield, VA 23832 Phone 804-?158-1236 ,~ , ROUTING SLIP/') · . ) YOur request ) For your information ) Note and return ) Per our conversation ) Discuss with me ( ) For your signature ( ) Comment~ ( ) Take appropriate action ( ) Please answer ( ) Prepare reply for signature ) For your approval ( ) File :ee Pal~..¢'- q77! Con~:en~s of Site Plan 1. Na~e & Loc (T~ Sec.) of Development 2. Use, A~ea & Zon~m~ of Tract 3. Name & Address cf Owner & Applicant ~. Name & Address cf Person Prep Plan 5. Owner & Zonin~ &~acent l~operties 6. BouMa~y of tra:t-course & diet. 7. Date,Scale,N. Pt & ~ of Shee~3 8. Vicinity Sketch 9. ~WL~nea-Edges & Centerllne .0. Bldg.$etback & Dist.be~. Bldgs. 1. No. Storles-Sq.Pt. Floor Area 2. No. Dwell~ Urdt/0uest Room 3. Sidewalks, Alleys & Easemen=a ~. D~iveway,Ent/~x=,Curb Open,Crosov~. 5. ~k.S~ce, ~k.~ (Sec. 2.~. 1-2&1-8 ) ~. Off S~eet ~adL~ 7. ~/Pr~vate ~. ~blic/~ W.Sys~e ~y~_ 9. Oas, Power, Tel. L~nes & Easem~nts ~. Utility 1. Public Sto~ ~a~age System 2. Existi~ ~ F~i~ To~ 3. Slope,Te~aCe,Re=aln Wall & ~creen ~. L~lts of Estb. 100 ~.Flood Plain ~. Siva (S~. eneral Co~ents:~ ]. a. '{136 Coc~m~ Ro,~ ?acm~om), Vm(:;n~r,x 939,34 ' MARTIN and SONS, INCORPORATED CONTRACTORS Grading, Clearing, Storm Sewer Iastalla~ioas T~rPHONE 275-1670 August 30, 1974 Mr. W. A. Poole Chesterfield County Planning Commission Chesterfield Court Housg Va, Dear Mr. Poolei This letter is in reference to the conversation that you had with Mr. Cartledge concerning the buffer zone in front of the building to be constructed on Iron Bridge Road. In order for us to properly grade this property it was necessary for us to remove some of the trees from this area, however it is our intention to replace these with shrubs having a minimum height of five feet. In the event that this work can not be completed prior to our application for a certificate of occupancy we will have a signed contract to assure that this will be done. Very truly yours, J. _H. MARTI15I & SONS C~NTRACTORS, INC. James H. Martin, Jr. f~ Vice President March 6, I975 Mr. Robert T. Mart~n J. H. Martin & Sons, Inc. 6550 Iron Bridge Road Richmond, VA 23234 Re: Planting Plan for New OFfice Building Dear Mr. Martin: I am in receipt of the Planting Plan for the above referenced project prepared by W. B. Peebles at Southstde Nurseries. The Pinus Strobus between the office building and Route 10 and the Juniper~s Sylvestrls ~emina west of the parking lot shall be planted no farther apart than l0 feet unless a double, staggered row is used. Any areas along the side and rear property lines that were cleared during construction should be' replanted to meet the 20 foot buffer strip requirement in these areas. Care should be used in olantfng the Ilex $oaca 'Foster!' as this plant does not do well in wet areas. If the areas where this Holly is to be used have not been built-uo out of the swampy land, a different species might be more satisfactory. I would suggest that you hold off on the planting around the parking lot until at least Aoril 23rd to vive the Board of Supervisors time to act on your parking lot placement. Any area that is planted now that is damaged in completinz or movin~ your parking lot will .have to be reolanted. '~ ~ If I~L-can be of any assistance, please call me at 748-1236. Sincerely, ' Wlli~am D. Poole Planner ¥~P:h Planned Development request for Colebrook Company (Case #73S145), 3. Pedestrian walkways shall be provided-, marked and shown on the Schematic Plan. These wal~vays shall be placed at appropriate locations to be agreed upon by Planning Staf-f. ... ~. An additional twenty (20) feet of right-of-way shall be dedicated adjacent to the existing twenty (20) foot right-of-way running perpendicular between U.S'. Route 60 and Westfield Drive.. The aforedescrlbed right-of-way shall be constructed to State speci- ficaticns for the entire length of. the parcel. This construction. shall'be accomplished prior to the release'of Occupancy permits. for this phase of the'Shopping Center-development. .. 5. Access from the parcel to the right-of-way which is closest to the right-cf-ways intersection with Route 60 shall be eliminated. ~::.. ~. .~. '7~S9~2 Mr4 J. H. Martin, Jr, again comes requesting re,zOntn~ f~om Res-'' YdentYal (R-7) to General Business (B-3) of a 3.5 acre part of, a P~reel-.- of land of irregular shape in Dale Magisterial District containing I2 acres~ The section of the Parcel this request is on fronts approximately ~$¢~-ft,' on'Iron Bridge Road, extends in a northwestward direction to. a depth of approxLmately 900 ft., and is located approximately 250 northeast of the intersection of Iron Bridge Road and Canasta Drive; .'~' Refer to Tax Map Sec. 66-1 (1) part of,~arcel 3 (Sheet 22). Mr.'Bai~e~$6n states that this case was deferred from the April 16~ . .~ 1974 meeting in order to allow the applicant an opportunity to meet with Planning Staff to attempt to negotiate the proper land use control for the parcel in quest'ion. Mr. Balderson further states that on April ... 29, 1974 a meeting between Mr. Martin and Staff was held and'd.uring .. that meetLug.~l~. Martin indicated, thzt. it was his opinion that the rezoning as requested was appropriate for Route l0 insomuch as iS is. his assumption that strip commercialization of the· corridor was eminent. ~. Balderson states that Mr. Martin further indicate~ that because of his-'cdrrent option agreement for purchase of the subject parcel'he was not inclined to expend more time and what ever additional expense'm~ght be involved in amending the application.t° [.~., seek a Conditional Use for Planned Development as recommended. Mr. Balderson states that on April 13,.1974 the applicant presented a proposed layout, plan. whlchshows an office building which would be setback sixty (60~ £eetlfrom the .property llne, a shop yard and fuel island which would'.b~ 'located· 105"feet from the front property line. ~. Balderson notes that within the sixty (60)foot area extending .. into the i05 ~oot area a parking lot covering approximately~ 40%.of the front portion of the property would be positioned, he notes.the ten (10) foot buffer zones are indicated adjacent to all-'other property lines. Mr. Balderson states that Planning Staff in review of the plan find.s .the concept and. arrangement unacceptable with regard.So proper 'land use control in .light of the in¢~nt of development believed desired for the Route, 10 corridor. He further states tl~t t? proposed vse and for that matter any uses which would be under ~he or~ classification are inappropriate-f'0r Route lO. Ia this particular request Staff is of the opinion 'that the .applicant has given insufficient, consideration to adequately buffering to .proposed heavy commercial, use from adjacent property. . . · ~. Hawkins asks M~. Mart~n why he would not accept a Conditional Use for Planned Development? .. (over) ~ereby M~. Martin responds that he did not feel that this approach was feasible .in light ~of what he ultimately expected would ~occur along Route A represe~tative~of the Chesterfield Civic Associatelon speaks in opposi- tion to this request noting that the Associatiofl, which has ~embership throughout Chesterfield County, is concerned about what the. development philosophy for the Route l0 corridor and what such a philosophy will/~ utimate!y ~llow. H,~ indicates that heavy commercial andindustrial~us.e of this type should be Prohibited since such uses would be detrimental· to existing and future are~residential~d~velopment ~'f~ ~' ~ Mr, Howard~t~e~ that he is concerned'that the proposed rezoning an~~ use indicated would cause a detrimental impact to the area. Mr. Howard a~ks if th%s use could be placed within the interior of°the parcelo~ sinc~ th$ parcel is so large and has aheavy growth of trees. Mr,~Mart'in indicates the site ~ill have to be raised since it is in a~low ~are~ ~n~d~ that it i~ ~he~intention to constru~t'a~ eight (8) foot'fence to screen'~ heavy equipment. ...... '. .~. · ?, Mr. Burnett notes ~hat in his opinion such a use would not be detrimental to the Route t0 Corridor, therefore, it is on motion of Mr. Burnett,''~ seconded by Mr. O'Neill, resolved that the Planning .Commission recommends that the Board of Supervisors approve the aforedescribed rezoning ":' ._ subject to the imposition of the. fOllowing conditions: ",~'..- 1.) A buffer strip of not less lO0~feet in depth shall be.prsvided '-''J along the front property line. 'In this'tO0-foot buffer area. .'- no use with the exception ofl an office building, whi~B ·shall'. be set back no less than 50 feet from the property line and a~' entrance drive having a width·of not more than'.B0 feet may be ~' provided. ~ith the exception of the aforedescribed use.s~ this:~''': :' 100 foot bu~er area shall be left in a natural state with no',~ trees underbrush or other existing vegetation to be removed,.cut""'? :" cleared or'otherwise disturbed. ' .'~' '~.~ 2.) A twenty (20) foot wide buffer area shall be 'provided a~Jacent and'-.',: along to al! other property lines, this buffer shall be left in',& natural state wi'th no trees, underbrush or other vegetation t~' : 'be cut, cleared, 'removed or otherwise disturbed." :~-, · -'. .. ' ' ' ' "? ~.~': ~ 'i-: ~' - '.~. · All voe aye.~ ~" '.~'' -."- ~.' 7~S0~ ~.~. Alv~rnon Smith, Attorney comes rePresent'lng Hardwicke ,Ass~c-. ~a~ requestin~ rezoning from Agricultural (A)~to Residential (R~25) (7.5 acres) of part.of'a.parcel of land in Midlothian Magisterial District containing 76.85 acres~ located approximately 800 ft. off the south/line· of U. S. 60 and lying'between walton Park Road and-the..Plantation Pipe'.'''~ Li~2.Co. easement...Refer to Tax Map Sec. 26 (1) parcel'21 (SBeet ?).~.'.'.' Mr. ~redrick Gray, Attorney representing ar6~ residents who.have coho'em over this request asks that this matter be deferred for a-period'of :' thirty (30) days in order to.allow those that he re~resents-an oppor6U'nity to study the application so that a prop'er response might be .made... Mr. 'Sm~h states'that.should this commission see fit-the applicant would' accept deferral of this case. ..... .., ~ .-~. -' ,"% MEMORANDUM February 12, 1975 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: Mr. O. D. Rudy, Commonwealth's Attorney Mr. J. Schiavo, Zoning Inspector~ Chesterfield County vs. James H. Martin, Jr. 1. On January 28, 1975, James H. Martin, Jr. unlawfully did violate Article 25 Section 25-2 (1) of the Chesterfield County Zoning Ordinance to-wit: construct a parking area which is not in accordance with the approved s~e plan and the condition of zoning. This violation took place at 6550 Iron Bridge Road, Richmond, Virginia 23234. (Tax Map Sec. 66-1 (1) Part of Parcel 3. 2. Summary of the violation: a. On June 12, 1974 the Board of Supervisors approved the rezoning of the subject property from Residential (R-7) to General Business (B-3). This rezoning was approved with the conditions that: 1. A buffer strip of not less 100 feet in depth shall be provided along the front property line. In this 100 foot buffer area no dse with the exception of an office building, which shall be set back no less than 50 feet from the property line and an entrance drive having a width of not more than 30 feet may be provided. With the exception of the aforedascribed uses, this 100 foot buffer e rea. shall be left in a natural state with not trees underbrush or other existing vegetation to be removed, cut cleared or otherwise disturbed. 2. A twenty (20) foot wide buffer area shall be provided adjacent and along to all other property lines, this buffer shall be left in a natural state with no trees, underbrush or other vegetation to be cut, cleared, removed or otherwise disturbed. b. On August 21, 1974 the preliminary site plan for the proposed contractor shop and office was reviewed and the builder and owner advised in writing that "no parking can be within any of the 100 foot buffer area'!. c. On September 9, 1974 the final site plan for this project was approved and a revised plat returned to the builder and owner which removed all parking from the 100 foot buffer zone. Mr. Martin me~ with Mr. W. Poole, Planning Department and discussed the revised plat. d. On January 9, 1975 Mr. W. Poole, Planning Department visited the subject property and found that part of the required parking area had been built in the 100 foot buffer zone. Mr. Poole then advised the Building Inspector and r of the problem. e. On or about January 10, 1975 the Building Inspector advised Mr. Martin of the problem regarding his parking area and that it would have to be removed from the 100 foot buffer are a. f. On January l?, 1975 I inspected this project for Final Occupancy, and found the following: I. Building already occupied. 2. Driveway and parking area not paved. Buffer areas were cleared, not replanted. Parking spaces located in 100 foot buffer zone. ~then spoke to the Building Inspector regarding this problem, and then called Mr. James Martin and advised him we could not recommend occupancy Until he corrected the above problems. I recommended that he remove the parking area from the buffer zone, or request that this condition of zoning be amended to permit parking in the buffer area. g. On January 27, 1975, Mr. W. Poole spoke to Mr. Robert 'Martin and explained the problem regarding the parking and what must be done. Mr. Martin'left'Mr. Poole with the impression that the parking problem was not very important and that it would be taken care of in time. h. On January 28, 1975, I spoke to Mr. Robert Martin and advised him that' in order to show good faith on their part, that they file an application with the Planning Department by COB to amend the conditions of zoning to permit parking in the buffer zone. I further advised that if this was not accomplished we would get a warrant for Mr. James Martin. No application was received on this date. i. On January 29, 1975 I obtained a warrant for Mr. James Martin, Jr. J. On February 4, 1975 Mr. James Martin, Jr. filed the required application to amend the conditions of zoning· k. On February 12, 1975, the General District Court of Chesterfield County (Hon. J. F. Daffron, Jr.) continued this case until May 14, 1975, and instructed Mr. Martin not to pave the subject parking area until this case is resolved. The continuance was granted in order to allow' Mr. Martin time in which to request the Board of Supervisors to amend the conditions of zoning to permit parking in the 100 foot buffer zone. MEMORANDUM February 12, 1975 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: Mr. O. D. Rudy, Commonwealth's Attorney Mr. J. Schiavo, Zoning Inspector~ Chesterfield County vs. James H. Martin, Jr. 1. On January 28, 1975, James H. Martin, Jr. unlawfully did violate Article 25 Section 25-2 (1) of the Chesterfield County Zoning Ordinance to-wit: construct a oarking area which is not in accordance with the approved s~ plan and the condition of zoning. This violation took place at 6550 Iron Bridge Road, Richmond, Virginia 23234. (Tax Map Sec. 66-1 (t) Part of Parcel 3. 2. Summary of the violation: a. On June 12, 1974 the Board of Supervisors approved the rezoning of the subject property from Residential (R-7) to General Business (B-3). This rezoning was aporoved with the conditions that: - 1. A buffer strip of not less 100 feet in depth shall be. provided along the front property line. In this 100 foot buffer area no use with the exception of an office building, which shall be set back no less than 50 feet from the property line and an entrance drive having a width of not more than 30 feet may be provided. With the exception of the aforedescribed uses, this 100 foot buffer area shall be left in a natural state with no trees underbrush or other existing vegetation to be removed, cut cleared or otherwise disturbed. 2. A twenty (20) foot wide buffer area shall be provided adjacent and along to all other property lines, this buffer shall be left in a natural state with no trees, underbrush or other vegetation to be cut, cleared, removed or otherwise disturbed. b. On August 21, 1974 the preliminary site plan for the proposed contractor shop and office was reviewed and the builder and owner advised in writing that "no parking can be within any of the 100 foot buffer area".- c. On September 9, ].974 the final site plan for this project was approved and a revised plat returned to the builder and owner which removed all parking from the 100 foot buffer zone. Mr. Martin met with Mr. W. Poole, Planning Department and discussed the revised plat. d. On January 9, 1975 Mr. W. Poole, Planning DePartmen~t visited the subject property and found that part of the required parking area had been built in the 100 foot buffer zone. Mr. Poole then advised the Building Inspector and I of the problem. ~e. On or about January 10, 1975 the Building Inspector advised Mr. Martin of the problem regarding his parking area and that it would have to be removed from the 100 foot buffer area. f. On January 17, 1975 I inspected this project for Final Occupancy, and found the following: 1. Building already occupied. 2. Driveway and parking area not paved. 3. Buffer areas were cleared, not replanted. 4. Parking spaces located in 100 foot buffer zone. I~then spoke to the Building Inspector regarding this problem, and then called Mr. James Martin and advised him we could not recommend occupancy until he corrected the above problems. I recommended that he remove the parking area from the buffer zone, or request that this condition of zoning be amended to permit parking in the buffer area. g. On January 27, 1975, Mr. W. Poole spoke to Mr. Robert 'Martin and explained the problem regarding the parking and what must be done. Mr. Martin left Mr. Poole with the impression that the parking problem was not very important and that it would be taken care of in time. h. On January 28, 1975, I spoke to Mr. Robert Martin and advised him that in'order to show good faith on their part, that they file an application with the Planning Department by COB to ~mend the conditions of zoning to permit parking in the buffer zone. I further advised that if this was not accomplished we would get a warrant for Mr. James Martin. No application was received on this date. i. On January 29, 1975 I obtained a warrant for Mr. James Martin, Jr. J. On February 4, 1975 Mr. James Martin, Jr. filed the required' application to amend the conditions of zoning. k. On February 12, 1975, the General District Court of Chesterfield County (Hon. J. F. Daffron, Jr.) continued this case until May 14, 1975, and instructed Mr. Martin not to pave the subject parking area until this case is resolved. The continuance was granted in order to allow Mr. Martin time in which to request the Board of Supervisors to amend the conditions of zoning to permit parking in the 100 foot buffer zone. 'JBJECT: Site Plan Review · Pre LJ~/na~? , Contents of Site ~lan R~kl 1. Name & Loc (T~ Sec.) of Development 2. Use, Area & Zonir~ of Tract 3. Name & Address of ~ ~ Applicant ~. N~e & Address of Person Prep Pi~ 5. ~er t Zon~ Adjacent ~opertles ~. ~y of tract-co,se ~ dis~. ~. Date,~cale,N. p~ ~ ! of ~heets ~. Vlc~ity Sketch ~. ~ Lines-~es ~ Centerline 3. Bldg. Setback ~ Dl~t,be~. Bld~s. i. No. ~orles-Sq.Pt. Floor ~ea 2. ~o. ~ell~ Unlt/~uezt ~oom ]. Sidewalks, AXleys ~ ~semen~s -. ~Xve~a~,En~xt,C~b ~en,Croso~. o~ Pmk.'~pace, Prk. I, ct (Sec · 2q · !-2&1-8 ) O.f' St,eet Loadtm~ Spaces(2,.l-7) ~k'-:~/Pr/vate ~anltary System ]. 6a$, Power, Tel. Lines & Easements 3. Utility ;ase~ent~ i. Public S~or~ Drainage System ~. 31ope,Te~ce,~e=ain Wall $ S~reen ;. L~tts of Estb. 100 ~.Flood Plain eel .I ]. H. 31,26 Co~n~u. Rox~ fhc-~xioN~, Vmc~ux 28284 Mr.W.A. MARTIN and SONS, INCORPORATED CONTRACTORS Grading, Clearing, Storm Sewer Installatio~ August 30, 1974 Poole Chesterfield County Planning Commission Chesterfield Court Housg Va. Dear Mr. Poolei T~X~_~ONE 275-1670 This letter is in reference to the conversation that you had with Mr. Cartledge concerning the buffer zone in front of the building to be constructed on Iron Bridge Road. In order for us to properly grade this property it was necessary for us to remove some of the trees from this area, however it is our intention to replace these with shrubs having a minimum height of five feet. In the event that this work can not be completed prior to our application for a certificate of occupancy we will have a signed contract to assure that this will be done. Very truly yours, J.~H. MARTI~ & SONS CONTRACTORS, INC. ·" '~'~"~' '~'~ "t"':" ~'~ /James H. Martin, 'Jice President A buffer strip of not less than 100 ft. depth shall be pro- cided along the front property line. In this 100 ft. buffer area, no use with the exception of an office building, which shall be setback no less than 50 ft. from the property line, and an entrance drive, having a width of not more than 30 ft. may be provided. With the exception of the aforedescribed uses, this i00 ft. buffer area shall be left in a natural state with no trees, underbrush, or other existing vegetation to be removed cut cleared or o-herwise disturbed. A 20 ft. wide buffer area shall be provided adjacent to and along all other property lines. This buffer shall be left in a natur'a! state with no trees, underbrush or other Yege- tation to be cut, cleared, removed or otherwise disturbed. It was the intent that these two conditions be imposed in order to provide protection for the Route 10 corridor and reduce any detrimental impact that might be experienced as a result of high intensity development ahat would be permitted under the General Business (B-3) classification. The Board of Supervisors in con- sidering this request on June 12, 1974, approved the rezoning sub- Ject to the imposition of the above noted conditions. It should be noted that at both the Planning Commission and Board hearings~ the applicant agreed to the conditions imposed, however, when construction occurred on the parcel, both conditions were ignored, and both buffer areas were either partially or entirely cleared. In addition, a parking lot which was prohibited by condition #1, was also constructed in the front buffer area. The applicant is now aledging that he,will landscape part of the required buffer area (condition #2), along the sides of the parcel. By this request, the applicant is asking that he be relieved of the obligations of condition #1, and it is his intent to strip the parcel of what existing vegetation remains. The applicant has further aledged that he will landscape the entire parcel once he is allowed to strip the trees. The intent of both previously imposed conditions was to obscure from site any commercial use which might be made of this parcel. It has been widely assumed that this area should be protected from co~,mercial development as has occurred along Route 1 and Route 60. Although Complete prohibition of higher intensity development is not suggested, it is generally been assumed that such develop- ment would be given special treatment so that neither garrish appearances or adverse traffic situations would result from the uses permitted. With regard to the parael in question, the applicant's attitude and action in this development has been to completely ignore the conditions which were imposed. DENIAL OF THIS REQUEST IS P~COMMENDED~ AND IT IS FURTHER R~COM- MENDED THAT THE APPLICANT BE INSTRUCTED TO RESTORE THE BUFFER AP~AS (AS ~EST AS POSSIBLE) TO THEIR NATURAL STATE. AS PART OF THIS RESTORATION THE PARKING AREA. IS TO BE RE~R~ED AND EVERGREEN, ~LANTS A~D SCHRUBS ARE TO BE PLANTED HAVING A SUFFICIENT DENSITY (2) April 23, 1975 ~(B.S.] March -18, -. t 975--~Pn,~0~-)- CASE NO: 75S045 APPLICANT: J. H. Martin and Sons Contractors, Inc. REQUEST: Amendment to a Condition (#1) which was imposed in the approval o7 rezoning case 74S042 (R-7 to B-3). PROPOSED USE: The applicant wishes to clear the area in front of the equipment contracting office and storage yard which now occupies the parcel. TAX MAP IDENTIFICATION: 3 (Sheet 22). Dale ~agisterial District, T. M. 66-1 (1) GENERAL LOCATION: North side of Iron Bridge Road (Route 10). North- east of the intersection of Ironbridge Road and Canasta Dr. ACREAGE (SUBJECT PARCEL): 3.5 acres. EXISTING ZONING: General Business (B-3). EXISTING LAND USE (SUBJECT PARCEL): The parcel is currently occupied by a Contractor's office and storage yard. ADJACENT AND AREA ZONING AND LAND USE: The majority of adjacent prop- erty is zoned Residential IR-7) with the exception of property to the southwest which is zoned Community Business (B-2) and prop- erty to the south directly across Iron Bridge Road, which is zoned Agricultural (A). The majority of adjacent property is wooded and vacant with the exception of some parcels which have been residentially developed. The parcel to the extreme southwest which is zoned Community Business (B-2) is presently occupied by a Junk yard and automobile repair business. This particular parcel represnets a perineal problem with regard to Code Enforcement. Junked automobiles and parts thereof have-accumulated and are strewn about the property. This constitutes a violation of the zoning ordinance and the owner/operator of the business has been requested on numerous occassions to comply with the Coundy Code. PUBLIC FACILITIES: The requested exception to the previously imposed conditon should have no impact on either existing or future area public facilities. TRANSPORTATION AND TRAFFIC: The parcel has access to Route 10 by means of a single access drive which serves the construction com- pany storage yard and office. STAFF ANALYSIS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: On May 21, 1974, the Planning Com- mission recommended to the Board of Supervisors that they approved ~ rezonlng of the parcel in question from Residential (R-7) to Gen- eral business (B-3) with the stipulation that the following two conditions be imposed: (over) AND HEIGHT UO CREATE A NATURKL LANDSCAPED APPEARANCE. A REPLANT- ING PLAN IS TO BE SUBMITTED TO AND APPROVED BY THE PLANNING DEPART- ~NT~ AND THE WORK IS TO BE ACCOMPLISHED WITHIN 90 DAYS FROM THE DAgE OF RESOLUTION OF THIS REQUEST. SHOULD THE PLANNING COMMIS- SIOi{ FEEL IU APPROPRIATE TO REC0~END THE VAIVING OF CONDITON ~1,__ ALLOWING CCi.iPLETE STRIPPING OF THE NATURAL VEGETATION OF THE PARCEL,._ IT IS RE~O}2.ll~DED THAT A NEff PLANTING PLAN BE SUBMITTED. THE NEW PLA~ SHOULD i~CLUDE AT LEAST THREE AODITIONAL ROWS OF PLANTS AC-' ROSS THE YROl~T PLANTED AT A MAXIMUM 0P 10 FT. FROM THE CENTERS AND AT LEAST 5 FT. TALL UPON INSTALLATION. AT LEAST TWO THIRDS OF THE PLANTS MUST BE EVERGREEN;.. CASE HISTORY AND PAST COMMISSION AND BOARD ACTION FOR THIS REQUEST C.P.C. 3 18 75: Tke Commission votes unanimously to recommend approval of this request. In addition, they agreed that the applicant can start now to clear, drain and fill the buffer area along the front of this parcel. Before the April 23, 1975 meeting of the Board of Supervisors, the applicant shall present to the Planning Department a planting plan for approval. This plan should provide for at least 5 rows of trees (2/3 evergreens) plus ornamentals. The trees should be planted along the front of the property at a maximum of 10 feet from the centers and be at least 5 feet tall at time of installation. This buffer area shall extend back at least 70 feet from the front property line. Additional planting will be necessary wkere any other buffer areas were disturbed. (3) ?i ?58O45 Amendment to Condition Scale 1"=600' Sheet 22 3 March 6, 1975 Mr. Robert T. 9. H. ~smtin & Sons, In~. 6550 Iron B~idge. Road Rlc~nd, VA 2323~ - - Pl~glng PI~ for New OFfice Bulling Dear Mr. Martin:- I am in ~eceipt of the Planting Plar~for the above referenced project prepared by W. B. Peebles at Southside Numseries.~ The Pinus Strobus between-the office building and Route'10 . knd the Juniper~s Sylvestris ~emtna west of the parking lot shall be planted no farther apart than l0 feet unless a double, staggered row is used. Any areas along the side and rear property lines that were cleared during construction should be replanted to meet. the 20 foot buffer strip requirement in these areas... Care~~. should be used in planting the Ilex Spaea 'Posteri, as this plant does not do well in wet areas. If the areas where this Holly is to be used have not been bui!t-u~ ou~ of the swampy land, a different' species-might be more-satisf~eto.r~_ I would suggest that., you. hold off on the planting around the parkin~ lo~ un~il a= leas$ A~ri~ 23rd to give the Board of - Supervisors time to ac~ on you~ parking..lot placement, that is planted now that is damaged in completing, or moving your- parking lot will have to be replanted. If'~-~ be of any assi~tance, please call me at ?~8-1236. Sincerely~ William. D. Poote Planner t J. H. ~rth & Sons, Inc. 65~0 Ironbridge Road Chesterfield County, Virginia February !0, 1975 S irs: MEMBERS: Amtrican A~o~iation o~ ~iurstrym~n Southern ~Yurstr~tntn's A~sociation Virginia Nurstr~en' s Assoc~ion Richmond Nurs~n' s Associa~i~ We resoectfully submit the following proposal. In compliance with requests from J. H. Martin & Sons, Inc., for a screening planting at their grounds, 6550 Ironbridge Road. Chesterfield County , a plan has been submitted by Sonthside Nnrseries, Inc., 9040 Dorsey Road, Richmond, Va. The plan was designed and will be planted by Southside Nurseries, Inc. The objective as presented to planners from Southeide Nurseries, Inc. was to provide an evergreen vegetative screen between the grounds of J. H. Martin and Sons, Inc. and Route 10- Ironbridg~ Road; and between said company and a neighboring unkempt private residence. A p~anting design , as enclosed copy, was made and' has ~been ac(;eate¢~ by the requesting firm. The materials were chosen for their ability to provide the visual screening effect desired, survive the soil atm6~phemic conditionS at the site, ed blend with the existing vegetation. The year-round density, flowering, and berries should be noted for their aesthetic as well as functional qualties. Barrfng continued wet conditions, J, H. Martin & Sons, Inc. has agreed to have all topsoil fillin~ and grading done bm or before March 15, 1975. At the completion of this work and also barring continued wet conditions, Southside will within the following week complete the planting. W. B. Peebles SOUTHS ID]~ N~RSE~RIES INC. .- / ~ ,: _- ,. . /// .,,'./ .;,~---" ,.~ ~ l?BP/eaa t~ Z :z 0'~ o ~ '~ ~ '~ FOR OFF~CE USE ONLY ~ -'~/ of Supervisors Case No. ~ * .~.~. '~', '-~ard of Zoning Ao~eals Fee Receipt No. APPLICATION TO THE CHESTERFIELD COUtITY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OR BOARD OF ZO;.',IING APPEALS THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION SHALL BE TYPED OR PRINTED AND COMPLETED IN FULL 1. EXPLAIN FULLY THE REQUEST DESIRED A) R~O~IN~: From ( ) To ( Type of use(s) proposed: , CONDITIONAL USE: OPERATE GENERAL CORPOraTE OFFICES ONLY FROM AN EXISTING DWELLING C) VARIANCE: D) SPECIAL EXCEPTION~ A) NAME OF APPLICANT: MARYLAND COAL & COKE COMPANY B) MAILING ADDRESS: 2015 STAPLES MILL ROAD, SUITE 18, RICHMOND, VA. 23230 C') TELEHONE NO.: 359-2487 D) NAME OF PRESENT OWNER OF PROPERTY 0~ WHICH THIS REQUEST WILL OCCUR; MARYLAND COAL & COKE COMPANY SPITE 18~. RICHMOND, VA. 23230 E) MAILING ADDRESS: 2015 STAPLES MILL ROAD~) TELEPHONE NO.: 359-2487 G) NAME OF PERSON TO BE NOTIFIED IF OTHER THAN APPLICANT AND/OR PROPERTY OWNER: H) ADDRESS: I) TELEPHONE NO.: IF THE APPLICANT iS NOT THE OWNER OF THE PROPERTY IN QUESTION, EXPLAIN: (A Copy of pending contract or option agreement shall be attached hereto and made a part of this application.) A) c) H) LOCATION OF PROPERTY IN QUESTION (Following information shall be obtained from the Office of the County Assessor, Room 213) MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT B~ TAX MAP NO ~.-..~ L~ ! SEC. NO. D) . SUBDIVISIOL~ NO. E) BLOCK NO, LOT OR PARCEL NO,._. ,"~'"~a/? ~ ¢;) STREET ADDRESS SOURCE OF TITLE FOR ALL ?ROPgR?TgS DEED SOOk PA~E STATE THE REASON . ~'R THIS REQUEST: DESIRE 'l~ LOCATE OFFICES NEAR RESIDENCES OF MOST EMPLOt~CES WHO LIVE IN CHZSTERFIELD COUNTY 6. STATE HOW ~I~IS REQUEST ?!I,.L NOT BE MATERIALLY DETRI[-[ENTAL TO THE '- ADJACENT PROPERTY ~ .... ~ ' ~ v~',~,,m.~o OR THE SURROUNDI[,]G NEIGHBORHOOD: HAVING A $100 MILLION COMPANY LOCATE ITS OFFICES IN THE AREA SHOULD MATERIALLY INCREASE THE VALUE OF SURROUNDING PROPERTY EXPLAIN ANY EXISTING USE PERMIT SPECIAL ~XCEPTi._,N~ CONDITIONAL USE OR VARIANCE GRANTED PREVIOUSLY ON THE PARCEL iN QUESTION: 8. A) EXISTING LAND USE(S): B) EXISTING STRUCTURE(S): ~. USE: ;; C) EXISTIN~ ZONING: A ~'YPE D) TOTAL ACREAGE OF THE REQUEST: GIVE NAMES OF ALL OWNERS ADJACENT, ACROSS THE ROAD OR HIGHWAY AND FACING THE PROPERTY AND ANY OWNERS ACROSS ANY RAILROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY FROM SUCH PROPERTY. IN THE EVENT THE PROPERTY AFFECTED IS SITUATED AT OR WITHIN 100 FEET OF THE INTERSECTION OF ANY TWO OR MORE ROADS OR HIGHWAYS, AT OR WITHIN ONE HUNDRED FEED OF THE INTERSECTION OF ANY ROAD OR HIGHWAY WITH A RAILROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY OR AT OR WITHIN ONE HUNDRED FEET OF THE INTERSECTIOH O? THE RIGHT-OF-WAYS OF ANY TWO RAILROADS, GIVE NAMES OF PROPERTY OWNERS AT ALL CORNERS OF ANY SUCH INTERSECTION. (Following information MUST BE obtained by the applicant from the office of the County Assessor~ Room 213). A) SUBD ~' NAME :~ '-' LOT or PARCEL:'~ ~LOCK':" SECTION LOT or PARCEL SUBD. NAME: BLOCK: SECTION: PROPERTY OWNER'S NAME: MAILING ADDRESS: TAX MAP NO.: SUBD. NAME~ LOT or PARCEL: / ¢"'~ BLOCK: SECTION- PROPERTY OWNER. ' S NAHE'. .~ ~'~Z'7i~;' ~.~ , MAILING ADDRESS: -2- I ! / ! ! ,J, .H, MAR. TIN ~ SO/tlS CONT. /NC. SCAL£: 1%30' $ I -F£ PLA ^pril 23, 1975 ~.~ ..... , 1975 (?.0.) C~£E NUMBER: 75S038 APPLICANT: J. J. H. Corporation ~QUEST: Rezoning from Agricultural (A) to Residential (R~9), PROPOSED USE: A single family subdivision. The request parcels would be a continuation of the Archbrooke Subdivision. TAX MAP IDENTIYZ_CATION: In Clover Hill Magisterial District; Tax Map 28-9 (1) Parcels 2, 4, 7, 11 & 12 (Sheet 8). GENERAL LOCATIO~: Three separate parcels lying northeast of Reams Road in the vicinity of zhe intersections of Arch Hill Drive, Wadsworth Drive with Reams Road. ACREAGE (SUBJECT_ PARCEL): 11.88 acres EXISTING ZONING: Agricultural (A) EXISTING LAND L~E (SUBJECT PARCEL): Two existing single family dwellings. ADJACENT ~]YD AF~A, ZONING AND L~D USE: This zoning is requested on three separate parcels, two of which front Peams Road with the third parcel fronting the proposed ri~nt-of-way for the extension of Powhite Parkway, south of Pocoshock Creek. Adjacent properties surrounding the three parcels are either residentially or agra_culturally zoned and adjacent land has either been developed for single family residential use or remains vacant and/or agriculturally developed. UT~~; SOIL PROFILE; DRA~.~AGE AND EROSION; REQUIRED OFF-SITE EASEMENTS: Information not available at the time of this writing. However it should be noted that public water and sewer is available and will be used in the developn~nt of this project. PUBLIC FACILITY: Development of the parcel in question for single family residential use as intended is in keeping with the normal anticipated impact expected. TRANSPORTATION .~D TRAFFIC: Yhis rezoning and the continued development of Archbrooke Subdi~-ision will provide for the extension of Wadsworth Drive which will provide for another carrier street between Rea~ Road and Route 60. This additional access should assist in providing better means of traffic distribution in the area. GENERAL PLAN: Single family residential development for the area encompassing the parcel in question. ~he extension of Wadsworth Drive is reflected on the Chesterfield County General Plan. STAFF ANALYSIS .~WD RECOMMENDATION: Upon review of the proposed zoning and study of the area ~_n queszion, Staff is of the opinion that single family residential development under the rezoning requested is proper for the parcel. This rezoning will allow the further development of Archbrooke Subdivision and the extension of Wadsworth Drive. ~ne prcposed residential development is in keeping with the existing and planned development of the area. c.P.C. _3 i_~ 75: CASE HISTORY AND PAST CO~4ISSION AND BOARD ACTION FOR THIS REQUEST Approval of the request. RE2D~:DGE ~- ~G 758038 A 1;o Scale 1" = 600' 'Sheet 8 STAFF ANALYSIS AND RECOMMENDATION: Development of the parcel for single family subdivision is in keeping with the general development pat- tern of the area. The rezoning requested is the same zoning which has been applied in adjacent subdivisions. C.P.C. 3 18 75: CASE HISTORY AND PAST COMMISSION AND BOARD ACTION FOR THIS REQUEST Approval of this request is recommended. --¸2-- April 23, 1975 (B.S.) Mare h--t-8~--t-9 ~7~ (~. C.-)-. CASE NUMBER: 75SO39 APPLICANT: Investment Associates REQUEST: Rezoning from Agricultural (A) to Residential(R-15). PROPOSED USE: Single family subdivision (an extension of Loch Braemar). TAX MAP IDENTIFICATION: In Clover Hill Magisterial District; Tax Map 39-13 (1) Parcels 3, 4, & 5 (Sheet 14). GENERAL LOCATION: The north side of Gregory's Mill pond,west of Bexley Subdivision. ACREAGE (SUBJECT PARCEL): 5.57 acres EXISTING ZONING: Agricultural (A) EXISTING LAND USE (SUBJECT PARCEL): Vacant and wooded with the exception of three cinder block residences. ADJACENT AND AREA, ZONING AND LAND USE: The majority of adjacent property is zoned Agricultural (A) with the exception of that to the north wkich is zoned Residential (R-15). Adjacent property remains relatively undeveloped with the exception of the property to the north which is being developed as Loch Braemar Subdivision. UTILITIES: Public water and sewer is available to the site, and should be used in the development of this parcel. SOIL PROFILE: Soils in this area are well drained. Steep slopes in the area may limit use of a small part of the parcel. DRAINAGE AND EROSION: The parcel drains towards Falling Creek and extensive erosi6n control measures will be required in the development of this parcel. REQUIRED OFF-SITE EASEMENTS: No off-site easements will be required. PUBLIC FACILITIES: Development of the parcel for the intended use will have no marked impact on either existing or future area public facilities. TRANSPORTATION AND ~RAFFIC: It is intended that this parcel be served by the extension of Loch Braemar Drive which ultimately intersects with Providence Road north of the request parcel. GENERAL PLAN: Single family residential development for the area - encompassing the parcel in question. (over) ,.% GREGORY'S POND '~L L LADINO LA, IIBIIlII 75S039 A to R-15 Scale 1"= 600' Sheet DON.~LD W. McCoy' L. ST~Cy W~-~,V~. J~. RXC~A~D I~. Wx~iNS dOHN E. R~.Pgl~. J~. N~.x~ V. D~vxs E~o R. Z~V~T, III LAW Oi~i~ICt~S OI~ COY, WEAVER, ~ArI(~GIN$, CLEVELAIWI) ~ RAPER FAYETTEVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA ~8802 February 20, 1975 P. O. BOX 1688 TELEPHOtW-~ 488 - 81Oz~ aA CODE 919 Mr. Gene Freund Professional Builders 2817 Parham Road Richmond, Virginia 23229 Dear Mr. Freund: Mr. Todd Lecka ~called today and asked that I write you .concerning an application-for rezoning of our property there an Richmond to accommodate the construction of mini-warehouses thereon. Please consider this your authority from us to make application for such rezoning in order that mini-warehouses might be constructed on the property. With best wishes. Very truly yours, McC0Y, WEAVER, WIGGINS, CLEVELAND & RAPER ~'l~c~f~rd M. Wiggins RMW/la ..... ' ~ ~ ~"~ when compared ,x. a~ ].arose a ~P~naon as nav' he desired. Tbev ~sie~ h~s own ~adlock and key to ?'~.'w}l door. The _. ...o .... e~.t-ional s'horac~e companies have no privaee soaces and usually pa]ati.ze everything stored and charge ~:or [his i.n and cub service~ i.n adc~it, ion l-he,, ,'.~av ~. In our system the ~s:~r handles his own '-e~onq].nrTs and can have the securi.':-:~ o{ knowing that oPlv ~e '~as the key to Nis look. Ir addition, we are O'l, eN sOvep daYS a wee'k. The bi~ comoanieR are -.-o don'-c ckar~e the {tenant for entry in~-o h'~ as be cares. Our eneine {acilJ. ty is fenced w{%h a ~m_.]ard doq to prevent vandalism and Nurgul. arv. One off the most basic off. human neec!s is storace. "~ven thou,~.~ all o6 us have closets and storerooms within our lJvinq units, few off us ever have enough-. The inewitab!e "Fibber Haree's" c3. o~e~: de~.ze]ops. '.Fb~ ~ o~erF!ew tN} to the attic and then to the garage or [ t~ose ~-~!.la! 1. ovelr--hOO~ storage ] ock~rs in carports '"~ ..... i.t'- ali. the im.oressi~.re ~Nnn'dance of c]_oseh ~-'~ce ~n "o~r ~ew home, i.t only takes a 'few months or avea. r '-~ ~ ~ ] them to overflowinq. Them starts the attic./garame stuff[in~ cycle. This h~]man Phenomenon :~ worl'~-wJde, and not '[so].ated to the rich or poor. "'iv'-'~vone hates Ilo ~hrow away sometbin,,~ off value et- net "' a.-:-'~ ...... ~,:.= i -~ ~'"~ ?:~'"~e men}he',~ r'~;: ' Ne Fa,',.; 1.- ~ ,-. To co~pound this ~roblem, ms th[e ever--increasing affluence o~[ our society in addition to shorter work week~ snd eer].ier retirement. This creates more leisure time goods, e.g. camDinc~ equipment, fishing and hunting eear, scuba diving equ.~pment, water sking and boating equipment, hobbies and shop tools, etc. As most of us are aware, apartments and condominiums are becoming the most popular form of living for not just empty-nester, but many of the young that are deferring families. Very few of these apartments and condominiums have adequate storage therefore increasing the demand for storage. It should be noted that the space needs for businesses and commercial centers is also very great and needs to be considered with the individual needs. Obviously, most merchants can't store large stocks of seasonal inventory in their existing store area when buying in large quantities. The big moving campanies are too expensive for this need not to mention the lack of seven day week availability. The other alternative the merchant has open is to take a lease on a lar- ger than needed warehouse, (space that probably lacks the surcurity that is so necessary). Our system gives him a full time guard, on a month to month'basis, ~with easy access, in as much as all tenants have.their own padlock and key, they are in complete control as t© quali~y of the lock they use and who goes in their unit. .nventory'damage claims need to be argued because they alOnei~handle the goods. As to the businessman, ~he[_usually!~ays office rent from 40¢ to 80¢ per square foot per[month; therefore he's delighted to ren~ space at a reduced cost of 23¢ per square foot per month for whatever term he chooses to store excess office equip- ment, as well as dead file storage, etc. We've had apartment house owners that have guessed wrong on the number of furnished apartments they could rent. In order to avoid putting this excess furniture in a rentable unfurnished apartment, they now store it with us. To sell the furniture would be costly if the trend reverses for furnished units versus unfurnished apartments. Church, school, hospital, and many other institutional users store everything from e~uipment to costumes, (used annually in festivals), etc. Department store Christmas decorations have a]_wavs proved to be a problem in the past, now the mini-storage can solve this problem. The needs go on and on. Ones you wouldn't have expected, and ones yet. to be known. Maybe its to our credit as a nation that our people are thrifty and not inclined to waste. GENERAL PLAN: Commercial development for the area encompassing the parcel with the exception of property to the south which is indicated for development under single and multi-family land use. STAFF ANALYSIS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: Staff is of the opinion that the proposed operation is in keeping with those uses existing and being developed along this section of the Midlothian Turnpike. However, of prime concern in this case is the protection of the single family townhouse development to the south. The use which is proposed is a relatively quiet operation by which most of the activity is restricted to daytime hours. The applicant has indicated that he would be amenable to providing a reasonable setback and buffer so as to further protect the townhouses to the south. The proposed use would involve the construction of approximately 7 buildings housing 16 to 60 storage units each. These units would be of various sizes and intended to serve the various needs of those leasing the units. The preliminary site plan presented with the application indicates that the buildings would be placed parallel to each other and run north to south with driveways located between the buildings. After review of this plan, Staff is of the opinion that one of the buildings should be so positioned as to be parallel to the rear property line, thereby creating a structural buffer which would help to eliminate view of loading and unloading and other activities relative to the proposed use. Staff would propose that the back of this building face the back of the townhouses in Blocks K, L, and M of Providence Green. It is believed by providing a building parallel to the rear property line, develop- ment in this manner would accommodate the same number of units shown on the preliminary plan, while at the same time, offering better land use compatability to the residents of the townhouses to the south. CASE HISTORY AND PAST COMMISSION AND BOARD ACTION FOR THIS REQUEST C.P.C. 3 18 75: Recommend approval of this request allowing development of the parcel to occur as indicated, subject to the following conditions: 1. A buffer strip and setback having a width of not less than 30 feet shall be provided along the south property line. An orna- mental fence (incorporating security features) shall be provided along the property line. This fence shall have a height of not less than 6 feet. The buffer shall be planted so as to insure that no area within the buffer greater than 200 square feet remains clear or open. Staggered rows of a variety of evergreen -2- April 23, 1975 (B.S.) Ma~e~.J~ t 8, 1975--~P.-~. ) CASE NO: 75S042 APPLICANT: Professional Builders, In¢.~ REQUEST: The rezoning from General Business (B-3) to Agricultural(A), and a Conditional Use to permit the construction and operation of a mini warehouse facility. PROPOSED USE: Individual warehouse and storage areas which are in- tended to be rented to the public. TAX MAP IDENTIFICATION: (1) 12 (Sheet 8). Ciover Hill Magisterial District, T.M. 18-16 GENERAL LOCATION: South of Route 60, north of and adjacent to Providence Green Townkouses. ACREAGE (SUBJECT PARCEL): 5.71 acres. EXISTING ZONING: General Business (B-3). EXISTING LAND USE (SUBJECT PARCEL): Vacant and partially wooded. ADJACENT AND AREA ZONING AND LAND USE: Ail adjacent property to the east and west is zoned General B~siness (B-3). Property to the north across Route 60 is zoned Convenience Business (B-2), and property to the south is zoned Residential (R-TH). Adjacent property to the east, west, and north is occupied by various commercial enterprises while property to the south is occupied by the single family townhouse development of Providence Green. DRAINAGE AND EROSION: It is noted by the Engineering Department that in this area a severe drainage problem exists on the subject parcel. The drainage from Hardee's Restaurant and Putt Putt Golf Course is flowing across the Providence Green Townhouse project. Development of the parcel in question will require extensive drainage improvements. These improvements may include either the installation of pipe or providing paved ditches. REQUIRED OFF-SITE EASEMENTS: An off-site drainage easement may be required. PUBLIC FACILITIES: Development of the parcel as intended Should have no more than the normal impact anticipated. TRANSPORTATION AND TRAFFIC: The parcel in question does not front Route 60, but has access thereto by means of a 50 ft. right-of-way, extending southwardly to a depth of approximately 435 ft. It is anticipated that this right-of-way is sufficient to serve as access to the proposed use (See Staff recommendations). (over) trees and shrubs shall be used in the buffer area. A planting and landscaping plan showing the positioning and types of trees and shrubs to be used in this buffer shall be submitted to, and approved by the Planning Department prior to the issuance of any building permit. 2. A setback having a width of not less than 30 feet shall be provided along the east property line (adjacent to the parcels zoned Agricultural (A). An ornamental fence (incorporating security features) shall be provided along this property line. This fence shall have a height of not less than 6 feet. The first 10 feet of the setback shall be an area measured from the property line westwardly and shall be planted so as to ensure that no area greater than 50 square feet remains clear or open. Staggered rows of a variety of evergreen trees and shrubs shall be planted in this area. A planting and landscaping plan show- ing the positioning and types of trees and shrubs to be used in the buffer shall be submitted to and approved by the Planning Department prior to the issuance of any building permit. The remaining 20 feet measured westerly from the 10 foot aisle planted area may be used for parking and driveways, but shall not be used for the erection of any structure. 3. The final site plan shall be drawn to include buildings outside of the buffer areas, parallel to the south and east property lines. A building along the south property line shall not be less than 300 feet in length, and all entrances and exits shall be on the north side of the building. 4. There shall be a minimum separation of 23 feet between buildings. 5. Ail llgktlng must be so installed so as not to project into adjacent properties. A lighting plan shall be presented to and approved as part of the final site plan approval. 6. A minimum of 5 parking spaces (no less than 10 by 20 feet in size) shall be provided in the area of that building to be used as the office. 7. Only one advertising sign shall be permitted, and that sign shall be placed within-the 50 foot right-of-way which will serve the requirements and restrictions governing sign type and location in a B-3 zone. 8. Ail driveways shall be paved. -3- Iiiiiiiiii \ .\' ~ 8-2 ~) ~. - RTH 74S176 Conditional Use Planned Development Scale: 1'=600' Sheet 8 ~ended Condltionsl Use Scale: 1"~00 ' Sh Condi~'~ onal Use Scale:l"=600' Sh 8 75S042 (9) B-3 to A Conditional Use Scale: 1"= 600' Sheet 8 3312 WEST CARY STREET P. O, BOX 7474 RICHMOND, VIRGINIA 23221 PHONE: 355.5733 MEMBER RICHMOND BOARD OF REALTORS VIRGINIA REAL ESTATE ASSOCIATION NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF REAL ESTATE 8OAI~DS INSTITUTE OF REAL ESTATE MANAGEMENT MULTIPLE LISTING SERVICE OF RICHMOND ALL POINTS RELOCATION SERVICE I hereby agree to give 'fhJ r'1: ........ -- ':~. : .... , . r ..... ... ~ .... Dollars ($ _ ':. . -"; -), for the following property, to wit: All that certain parcel or piece of land, with all improvements thereon and all appurtenances thereto belonging, known as Lot ., Block , County/City of , Virginia, also known as "~ .... '"' Virginia. Payable as follows, to-wit: All Cash subject to the following terms and conditions: All cc~sh to seller; sub jo. ct ~) r,,urch:~ (:4 i~,i,':- . ........ are found r.~bove ground debris ,.'.:mi to r~,:,,~Jr ,-~c;7 :;!:r:.:.'~. :- provided the title is free from valid objections, subject to any recorded restrictions and easements now on the prop- erty. Conveyance will be made by General Warranty Deed. Settlement will be made in the office of C. PORTER VAUGHAN, INCORPORATED, lending institution, or clos- ing attorney on or before , 197 ; or as soon thereafter as title can be examined and papers prepared, allowing a reasonable time to correct any objections reported by the Title Examiner. Taxes and rents, if any, will be pro-rated as of day of settlement. If the existing loan is being assumed, the Purchaser will reimburse Seller for amount in escrow account, if any, and accrued items will be prorated as of day of settlement. The risk of loss or damage to said premises by fire or otherwise is assumed by Seller until settlement is made. Seller will deliver actual possession on It is expressly agreed that, notwithstanding any other provisions of this contract the purchaser shall not be obligated to complete the purchase of the property described herein or to incur any penalty by forfeiture of earnest money deposits or otherwise unless the seller has delivered to the purchaser a written statement issued by the Federal Housing Commissioner or Veterans Administration setting forth the appraised value of the property for mortgage insurance purposes of not less than $ ., which statement the seller hereby agrees to deliver to the purchaser promptly after such appraised value statement is made available to the seller. In the event the Purchaser is unable to obtain the loan according to the terms hereinabove stated, all deposits, less out of pocket expenses such as appraisal and credit report, will be refunded to the Purchaser. Purchaser agrees to make prompt and proper application for the loan. I hereby make a deposit of $ to bind this contract, to be held in trust by C. PORTER VAUGHAN, INC., which is to be applied on purchase price; or refunded if title is not good or this offer not accepted within __ days. ShouM either party deJault on the terms o/ this contract, the party so de/aulting shall pax,/or all commissions pitts the cost o[ col!ecting the xame including reasonable attorney's/ecs. ~ Purchaser and Seller understand and agree that C. PORTER vAuGHAN, INC., as Agent, is in no way respon- sible [or the condition or delivery o! the premises, the completion o! any construction or any delay in s~ttlement. "This is a legally binding contract· 1! not tmderstood, seek competent advice." 1 have examined the above property and agree to accept it in its present condition except as may be specified above. No verbal agreement is considered a part of the contract but any signed addition shall form a part of same. I hereby accept the above offer, this ... day of , 19 .... , and agree to pay C. PORTER VAUGHAN, INCORPORATED, Agents, for services rendered, a commission which is. of purchase p~ice. //~ _ // ,,. ' "';.K...:" [SEAL] Seller;~~ Witness the following signatures and seals at Richmond, Va., this .... " __day of 19 [SEAL] [SEAL] Purchaser HOWz,,A.D & UNDERWOOD 'RE. xL'I'ORS, INC. 4222 Bonniebank Road · Richmond, Virginia 23234 Telephone: 275-1451 Real Estate Sale Contract Dollars for tile following property: All that 6~ertain piece, parcel or lot of land with the improvements thereon; known as. provided the title is free frmn valid objections (subject to any restrictions now on the property). Settlement to be made at tile office of Howard & Underwood Realtors, Inc., on or before or as soon thereafter as the title can be examined and papers prepared, allowing a reasonable time to correct any objections reported by the Title Examiner. All rents, taxes, and interest to be prorated as of the date of settlement. The risk of loss or damage to said premises by fire or otherwise is assumed by the Seller until settlement is made. Buyer agrees to accept any reduction in price or terms acceptable to Seller. ~ ~.Actual possession subject to lease of present tenant to be given hereby make a deposit of _Dollars ($. ) to bind this contract which is to be applied on purchase price or reflmded if the title is not good or contingencies not consummated, or forfeited as commission if buyer should default. The parties to this contract hereby acknowledge and agree that Howard & Underwood Realtors, Inc., is the agent who brought about the sale of the property sold herein. In case either of the parties hereto default the party so defaulting agrees to pay the real estate commission and any legal expense incurred to collect commission. Purchaser covenants that this offer of purchase and his execution of the same is made after full inspection of the said property and no representations as to said property or any nnprovements thereon have been made to him by Howard & Underwood Reallors, Inc.. or any of its agents, salesmen or representatives and the said offer of purchase was made by said purchaser relying solely upon his own judgment. If mortgage financing is involved, buyer agrees to cooperate fully with agent and mortgage company. FOR F.H.A. LOANS ONLY It is expressly agreed that, notwithstanding any other provisions of this contract, the purchaser shall not be obligated to complete the purchase of the property described herein or to incur any penalty by forfeiture of earnest money deposits or otherwise unless ll~e seller has delivered to the purchaser a written statement issued by the Federal Housing Commissioner setting forth the appraised value of the property for mortgage insurance purposes of not less than $ , which statement the seller hereby agrees to deliver to the purchaser promptly after such appraised value statement is made available to the seller. The purchaser shall, however,, have the privilege and option of proceeding with the consummation of this contract without regard to the amount of the appraised valuation made by the Federal Housing Commissioner. (;. 1. CLAUSE In the event a G. I. Loan cannot be obtained, any down payment made, less any out of pocket expenses such as credit reports and .appraisal, will be refunded to veteran. TERMITE CLAUSE Tile seller' shall furnish tile purchasers at no cost prior to settlement a written statenrent (or certification) from a recognized exterminator that tllcre is no evidence of termite or other wood destroying infestation in lhe existing conslrttct~on, and, ii' infestation had existed~ it has been correCted and any damage due to infestation has also been corrected. If it is necessary to treat the structure, the purchasbrs wfIl be furnished a termite bond by the sellers at settlement. Purchaser is responsible for termites after recordation of warranty deed of sale. hereby accept thc above offer this day of , 19 .... and agree to convey the above property by General Warranty Deed with the usual covenants of~ title at my (our) expense and agree to pay Howard & Underwood Rea!t.o. rs,,Inc ,. for services rendered a commission o[.... ..... % on the.consideration above mentioned. (SEAL) WITNESS the following signature(s) and seal(s) at Richmond, Virginia, this day of (SEAL) Address (SEAL) (SEAL) .Phone ~ ~ . , .... , .~ I ~.', : ,' ::' ' ','~ ' '~'"" , , ' '": 1910 Byrd Avenue, SuitelG~ .':' ~ ..... '..~.-"' . .. ~'. '.:~d .... .-, .: ~ ~:~: '.'... ~.~ .~ ~' '' r., . !~;'.. ',~J~,s' 't ' . ~ ,, ¢ '~ , · ., , .. ~ · , . Janua~ 22, ~ 1975 ., ... · ....... , . ..,t ......... ,,. ,.~..~ ..... J ..~., t. ~.. ~-,~ ,.: . .~ .... I, - , ~., ,:.~ -~ ,, . ,: .~ ,. ~ ~ , , ,, ~ ,, , ~ ....... .... ~ .' . .. . , : .... I 'Pr"~t'~""::'' ' ' ' ' ' ' ''' ' ' ' '' ~ ' ..:.L' ., ~ ' ~. ~'. . '~. ',. ' I .:'',~.1,' ' : ~ set gte ~to'p rc ase top t.'s_bj t ;'.j .I/.~'.:1...". j his being able to ass~e the .existing first mortgage ~.'![':.:": ~n'the approximate ~o~t of $12',000;00.. ~ :. ~,' .~. : ' ' ~ .~ All other' condztzons .and .requirements in the'contract.:'o~ ', . ~ : . ~ '..' ,.::~'. , '" · ' '~ .... : I 4 . .. j .j: · ... ~,..,:~',. .' " ,i,...., , . , :..., ' ~" ' I'1' 1'' [ I ' ' '~ ' ' '' ' '' . , ' ........ ~ .. '.. I,,, .,' ....· ~ , . ' ' · , ...... :,1 .... '~..~;. ~ ' ..., , ',..: . ~ · .,~.. .... .,,..,... .. ,, ... ~ . · ~~~~' ' ~ ~".~ :"l,I t I' ~ , ' ' · ' ' : : ' · ' h','l ~ ' '' , " I ' I j, PHONE: OFFICE 276-781~ NIGHT-HOLIDAYS 272-2946 REPRESENTING 360WEST SHOPPING CENTER ROUTE36OWEST& TURNER ROAD CHIPPENHAM MALL ROUTE 36~WEST & CHIPPENHAM PARKWAY BUFORD SHOPPING CENTER ROUTE6OWEST (NR) BUFORD ROAD SOUTHAMPTON SHOPPING CENTER FOREST HILL AVENUE & WESTHAM ROAD HUGUENOT ¥iLLAGE ROUTE 147 & ROBIOUS ROAD MEADOWDALE SHOPPING CENTER CHIPPENHAM PARKWAY & HOPKINS ROAD THE LEA BUILDING 180EAST BELT BOULEVARD MANCHESTER TOWNHOUSES CHIPPENHAM PARKWAY & MANDALAY DRIVE CLOVERLEAF SQUARE APTS. CHIPPENHAM PARKWAY BETWEEN RT's INTERPORT SOUTH TOWNHOUSE WAi{EHOUSES TURNER ROAD NEAR RT. 360 LEMON TREE SHOPPING CENTER RT,~& TURNER ROAD 360 WEST SHOPPING CENTER 7148 HULL STREET ROAD RICHMOND, VIRGINIA 23235 October 15, 1974 Mr. Michael Ritz County Planner Chesterfield Court House Chesterfield, Virginia 23832 Re: Proposed Zoning Huguenot Village Shopping Center Rt. 147 (Huguenot Rd.)& Roblous Rd. Chesterfield County, Virginia Dear Mr. Ritz: Enclosed please find a check in the amount of $75 and an application re- questing zoning of the subject property. This letter is being sent prior to the October 28, 1974 deadline to be considered by the Planning Commission at 7 p.m. on November 19, 1974 and at 2 p.m. by the Board of Supervisors on December 26, 1974. This property was previously zoned under the old zoning ordinance as C-2 and which under the new zoning ordinance was automatically zoned B-3. However, during the transition period the subject property was either purposely or inadvertantly labeled B-2. B-2 does not permit zoning for most of our tenants for which we have made application for within the center and, there- fore, we do request a blanket zoning For the entire 33 acres. Thank you For your consideration in recommending this request for us. Yours very truly, PLTir:iw Enclosures CC: Travls Realty Company P. L. Trovls, Jr. T. L. Newton, Ri L. Bullfant., Jr. ALLSTATE COPY G 8-3 PRINTED IN U, TO: Ail Those Interested in the Rezoning Request of Consolidated Sales Co., Inc., Case No. 74S157 FROM' Mr. Michael ~. Ritz, Director of Planning SUBJECT: Deferral of public hearing from Feb. 26, 1975 to April 23, 1975 ~i Mr. Fred Gray, Attorney representing Mrs. Hopper in this case, has requested a deferral of the Board of Supervisors' consideration of this zoning case. As a State Senator, Mr. Gray has the right to ask for deferral of matters he repre- sents for a period of 30 days before to 30 days after a session of the General Assembly. Mr. Gray has asked the Board to defer the case for sixty (60) days or give him notice so that he could advise his client, Mrs. Hopper, to employ other counsel and give that counsel time to prepare. The Board, as a matter of courtesy, has indicated to Mr. Gray that on February 26, 1975 they will defer this case for 60 days. If you have any further questions about this matter, please contact this office at 748-1236. TO: FROM: SUBJECT: All Those Interested in the Rezoning Request of Consolidated Sales Co., Inc., Case No. 74S157 Mr. Michael C. Ritz, Director of Planning Deferral of public hearing from Feb. 26, 1975 to April 23, 1975 Mr. Fred Gray, Attorney representing Mrs. Hopper in this case, has requested a deferral of the Board of Supervisors' consideration of this zoning case. As a State Senator, Mr. Gray has the right to ask for deferral of matters he repre- sents for a period of 30 days before to 30 days .after a session of the General Assembly. Mr. Gray has asked the Board to defer the case for sixty (60) days or give him notice so that he could advise his client, Mrs. Hopper, to employ other counsel and give that counsel time to prepare. The Board, as a matter of courtesy, has indicated to Mr. Gray that on February 26, 1975 they will defer this case for 60 days. ~. If you have any further questions about this matter, please contact this office at 748-1236. un -r- 0 ~ J 23832 I~, V. nM,r4~tt; ~,~smcy Adninistrator OLD GUN ROAD - ROBIOUS CIVIC ASSOCIAI'ION MIDLOTH lAN, VIRGINIA 23113 10?00 Cherokee, Road Eidlothian, Va. 231I3 l? January 1975 Chesterfield County Planning Commission Chesterfield County Courthouse Chesterfield, Virginia Gentlemen: Re: Consolidated Sales Case 74 S 157; Jan. 21, 197~ I have been authorized by the membership of the Old Gun Road - Robious Civic Association, consisting of some 180 homeowners, to state our unalterable opposition to any re- zoning of the tract described above in Case 74 S 157, and known as Huguenot Millage Shopping Center, from B I and B 2 B3. to Our Group feels that the County was indeed liberal, ab initio, in granting the present authority to the developers Of the shopping center; and we are of the opinion that any furthe~ liberalization would but pollute.and prostztute the area to a greater degree. It is quite apparent that this portion of the County is adequately served by shopping facilities, and it would appear that further development would but tend tc siphon off trade already being served. One can see the result of overbuild- ing' of this type of trading center by driving but a few miles to view the horrible example. It is quite urmecessary to comment at length upon what worsened economic conditions can do to such a venture. In many instances the banker and the contractor a~e the only parties to turn a profit; while the neighborhood and the County coffers suffer. I am sure that is is unnecessary to dwell upon the factor of traffic congestion which has already been compounded by the existing mercantile facilities. I sincerely hope that it shall not take some horrible accident involving innocent people, perhaps schoolchildren, to call attention to the inherent dangers of any increased traffic at Huguenot and Robious Roads. Very/truly, ?resident; 3520 Olct Gu~, RoaA W¢~t /~. Midlothian, Virginia 23113 GOMMLII~IITY A$$OGIATIOI~I, lNG. P.O. Box No. ~83 Midlothian, Va. April 7~ 19~75 Mr. I. G. Hornet, Chairman Board of Supervisors County of Chesterfield Chesterfield, Virginia 23832 Dear Sirs: The residents of Winds. or Forest are concerned a~out the re~ zoning request as approved by the Planning Commias.~on on January 21~ 1975, for the Huguenot Village Shopping Center~ We believe that B-3 zoning for any part of the Huguenot Shop~ ping Center is not desirable and would certainly lead to additional requests along Route 147 from Robious Road to Route 60 for B~3 zoning, We believe it is all too likely the end result w©uld be business sites such as used car lots, truck terminals or other types of busi~ ness which would detract from the colonial design generally expected in this area. This would create a volume of traffic greater than the road system could handle and certainly more traffic than any residen- tial area should have. Please think of our area along Route 147 as a residential area with village type business places. Do not allow our area to become a business development like Route 60 and the South Side area, Please vote no on the rezoning request for Huguenot Village Shop~ ping Center. We like the shopping center aa the name implies; a village +~ .... shopping center~ Sincerely, Calvin H. Hancock President, ~indsor Forest Community Association~ Ine cc: Messrs. M. W. Burnett, County Administrator A. J. Krepela, Midlothian D~strict Supervisor , R.W. Smith, Director, Windsor ~orest Comm~ Asso. HH/jc Mr. Irvin G, Horner Chairman, Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors P. O. Box 8988 Richmond, Virginia 23225 71.0~ Fernwood St., #2024 Rz¢'-~ond, Virginia 23228 December 22, 1974 ' 1974 '.~.~, Dear Mr. Hornet,. On September 25, 1974, the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors approved a B-3 zoning request of Mr. P. L. T~'avis representing Consolidated Sales, Inc. for the establishment of a vetez-~nary clinic in the Huguenot Village Shopping Center. Also of record was the approval and recommendation of the same by the Chesterfield Planning Commission on August 20, 1974. There ware no objections from the public to the establishment of a veterinary clinic in this Shopping Center at either of these hearings. Thc clinic was to be built in a wing of the Shopping Center which was._...~.~-~-+~... at th~ +~._..~ of the he~ring and. i~.. which some businesses were already operating. The area zoned for the clinic contained 2,000 square feet and was located at the south end of the Center. On October 8th I was told that the ·space which had been zoned by the Board for use as a veterinary clinic had been rented to another tenant. This new tenant was a larger concern which rented approximately 5,000 square feet including the site zoned for the clinic. ~r. Travis offered me another space of 1,500 square feet but in a different location within the Center. The new lccation is at the southwest end of the shopping arcade, and I belisve it is presently zoned B-2. This site is located in an area more remote from nearby residences than the original site. A site plan is attached for your review. Instead of applying for B-3 zoning for the veterinary clinic in the new location, Mr. Travis has now chosen to apply for a blanket B-3 zoning of the entire Shopping Center. I am aware of the problems surrounding this request and, therefore, ask for the. Board's approval in relocating my approved B-3 zoning to the propose~ site. Ail the provisions stated in my Letter of Intent, dated July 9, 1974,~ will be adhered to in my new location, should my request be granted. A copy of that letter is enclosed for your information. The clinic would be constructed and operated in exactly the same manner as pre- viously approved. Mr. Robert L. Bulifant, Jr.~ the owner of the Shopping Center, has already signed a lease with me for the new site contingent upon proper zoning, indicating his support in making this change, I have encountered considerable financial hardship by not having ~ clinic in which to practice, and I must formulate my future plans as soon as possible. I will, therefore, appre- ciate a timely response from the Board concerning my request. $incerely, David W. Moore DVM Attachments E2oert Howard Leo H. Myers J. R. Apperson A. J. Krepela ~Mi Merlin O'Neill W. Burnett Robert L. Bulifant, Jr. P. L. Travis o/ Z C ~ > il30 Heritage Road Richmond, Virginia 23220 July 9, 1974 Mr. Elbert Howard Chairman, Chesterfield Planning Commission Chesterfield, Vtrgiuia 23832 Dear ~'~r. Howard, My intention in writing this letter is to request a zonin~ variance for the establishment o~ a veterinar2 clinic in the Huguenot Village Shopping Center located in Chesterfield County. My proposed clinic would vary in several significant aspects from the traditional full-service veterinary facility, The clinic design would conform to the traditional architecture of the shopping center and the surrounding area. The pi~2sical structure would be small, limited ko approximately 1200-1500 square feet, and its construction would insure complete sound and odor control. Other features would include convenient parking, no incinerator, and no outdoor runs. Architectural plans are attached. 0nly medical services would be provided. No boarding or grooming of animals -- services often offered by veterinary hospitals -- would be done. These would be referred elsewhere. The emphasis of the praciice would be on outpatient care. Only limited space for overnight housing of post-surgical or critically ill patients would be available. 5. Treatment would be limited to dogs and oats. The clinic would reflect a highly professional atmosphere in all aspects of the business. It would be run on an appointment basis to avoid congestion, and a trained staff would be available. Other veterinary facilities have proven successful in shopping center situations. Dr. Rando!ph H. Adams' clinic in ~iarshfield, ~ss. is one such example. His clinic was featured in "Veterinary Economics" ~ay 1973, and a copy is at~ached for your review. Also, a similar facility is being constructed at the Four Seasons Shopping ~all in Charlottesville, Virginia. I am confident that should favorable consideration of my request be received, my clinic would provide a needed service to the a~ea. I will adhere to those restrictions placed upon myself and those which the Planning Commission deems necessary in the best interest of the community. Should additional information or details of my proposed plans be needed, I will be glad to make them available or meet with you at your convenience. Sincerely, David W, Moore Attachmsr~,ts at establishing the right to develop the parcel (or portions thereof) .... for less restrictive uses than those which were invisioned or intended when the parcel was originally zoned. As noted in the section dealing with transportation and traffic, increased Commercial zoning in this area permitting higher intensity development will result in creating a traffic generator which will obviously impact the area and cause a detriment to the safety and welfare of all motorists in particular, the area residents using the roads in the vicinity of the shopping center. Planning Staff is of the opinion, that in the best interest of the Robious Community, high intensity rezoning and development of the parcels adjacent to the intersection should not be permitted without careful consideration of the traffic generating impact of such rezoning. More directly to the case in point, the existing zoning should not be' increased. As exemplified by the existing Commercial Use, it is noted that this development has been a contributory factor to the traffic problem. It is apparent £rom the current request, that the applicant/ developers have completely ignored the fact that further high intensity use may quite easily create a more adverse traffic situation which is in direct opposition to the public good. As has been pointed out, in reports dealing with similar requests in the past, the original zoning approval was tempered by the belief that such rezoning would result in a low intensity commercial use which would be controlled so as not to create a detriment to either area development or vehicular traffic. The first rezoning from the Agricul- tural (A) classification was approved by the Board of Supervisors on October 14, 1959. An area containing 27.6 acres with the majority of its' frontage on Robious Road was rezoned to General Business (C-2) while a 2.3 acre parcel fronting along the east line of Huguenot Road was zoned Local Business (C-I). The zoning of these parcels were opposed by a number of adjacent and area residents and the property owners as well as the Old Gun Road Robious Civic Association. As evidenced by the record of that meet- ing area opposition was based upon the following reasons: a. Existing shopping facilities and existing zoning permitting such facilities are sufficient to serve the area. Establishment of a shopping center at the proposed location will detract from the value of Residential property in the area. c. Creation of~an extremely hazardous traffic situation at the intersection 'of Robious Road and Route 147. d. Encouraging undesireable elements and activities which would not be in keeping with adjacent Residential use. e. Unavailability of public utilities and poor area drainage. f. ]~o binding controls or guarantees that the shopping center as proposed would either be built as indicated by the developer or suffialently restricted to prevent a detriment to the area. The record also indicates that proponants of the proposed rezoning offered the following reasons for rezoning: The land in question is swampy and will have to be drained in order to develop the site. Draining of such a swampy area will be an advantage to the community. (2) Apri~-~23, 1975 (B.S.) Jamaary~,°7 ~ (P.C.) CASE NLU~BER: 74S157 APPLICANT: Consolidated Sales Company Inc. REQUEST: .Rezoning from Con~ianae (B-I) and Community Business .(B-2) to General Business (B-3). PROPOSED USE: Heavy Commercial Development (Shopping Center complex). TAX MAP IDENTIFICATION: Midtothian Mag. Dist. T. M. 8-16 (1) 5 (Sheet 2). GENERAL LOCATION: Southeast corner of the intersection formed by Robious Road, Route 147, and the ~outhern Railway Tracks. ACREAGE (SUBJECT PARCEL): Approximately 33 acres. EXISTING ZONING: Community Business (B-2) for approximately 27 acres of the parcel and Convenience Business (b-l) zoning for the remainder. EXISTING LAND USE (SUBJECT PARCEL): Huguenot Villag~'Shopping Center. ADJACENT AND AREA ZONING AND LAND USE: The majority of adjacent property is either Residentially or Agriculturaly zoned with the exception of property to the south which is zoned Convenience Business (B-I). Adjacent property is either vacant and wooded or has been developed for single and multi-family Residential use with the exception of property to the south which is being developed under the Convenience Business (B-i) zone. Property to the west has been developed primarily for recreational purposes through an operation of the Briarwood Swim and Racket Club. UTILITIES: Public water, and sewer is being used in the development of the parcel. DRAINAGE AND EROSION: Area drainage problems have occurred, however current development is assisting in solving these problems. TRANSPORTATION AND TRAFFIC: Planning Staff and Commission as well as the Board of Supervisors, in considering past requests for heavy com- mercial rezoning for this parcel and adjacent property have been quick to take into account the obvious disadvantages of approving such requests which would allow land uses that generate more traffic, and further imoact the poorly alligned intersection formed by Route 147, Robious Road, and the railroad tracks. These requests have been denied because of the belief that the higher zoning and resultant development of the parcel would be detrimental to the safety and welfare of those residing in the area, and those using the intersection. 3ENERAL PLAN: Commercial Development for the area encompassing the parcel. STAFF ANALYSIS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: In the recent past, the developer and his represenatives have made a number of requests which were directed (over) These uses, and their general location appeared acceptable to the area opposition, however the developer rejected the idea of seeking a Conditional Use for Planned Development and indicated that he intended to proceed with pursuing the rezoning of the parcel to the General Business (B-3) Classification. ?.C. 1 21 75: Recommended approval of rezoning to the General Business ~B-3-~ ci~ssification of ali the area curr~ently ~oned Comm. u.~ity Busi- ness (B-2) and rezoning to the Community Business (B-2) classification of that portion of the area currently zoned Convenience Business (B-i) this portion being the area shown for a restaurant on the applicant- developers approved site plan. Staff Memo 2 13 75: Mr. Fred Gray, Attorney representing Mrs. Hopper in this case, has requested a deferral of the Board of Supervisors' consideration of this zoning case. As a State Senator, Mr. Gray has the right to ask for deferral of matters he represents for a period of 30 days before to 30 days after a session of the General Assembly. Mr. Gray has asked the Board to defer the case for sixty (60) days or give him notice so that he could advise his client, Mrs. Hopper, to employ other counsel and give that counsel time to prepare. The Board, as a matter of courtesy, has indicated to Mr. Gray that on February 26, 1975 they will defer this case for 60 days. b. Ail of the buildings constructed in the shopping center will be of Colonial architecture, similar to the buildins constructed in the shopping center in Henrico County at the north end of the Huguenot bridge. c. This will be the only shopping center in the Bon Air area. d. Adequate parking would be insured by the Chesterfield County Zoning Ordinance. e. The shopping center will serve futura residential development of the area westwardly to the James River. f. Plans and specifications of the p~oposed shopping center would be submitted for approval to the Board of Supervisors. On March 12, 1969, the Board reviewed a request for General Business (C-2) rezoning of a parcel containing approximately 20 acres lying to the south and west of the previously zoned parcel. Although no op- position appeared at this meeting, it was noted that caution should be excersised in permitting additional commercial zoning in this area. It was therefore resolved that the requested C-2 rezoning be rejected, and no greater zoning than Local Business (C-i) be permitted. On May 10, 1972, property between these two parcels was zoned Local Business B-i). Again, the Board rejected a request for C-2 rezoning and it was stated that heavier commercial uses should be restricted to the area then classified C-2. Since these original zonings, developers of this area have pressured the County to permit expanded Commercial uses by approving less restric- tive Co~mercial zoning. In these requests, portions of the shopping center would have been rezoned to General Business (B-3) for specific uses. The Board of Supervisors did in fact, approve one such rezoning to allow the use of a Veteranary Clinic, however the developers of Huguenot Village chose another use for this site. The current request now proposes that the entire shopping center area be rezoned General Business (B-3). It is argued that this zoning more closely approximates the B-1 and C-2 zonings previously granted. Planning Staff is of the opinion that B-3 rezoning would permit uses which go beyond those that would have been permitted under C-1 and C-2. It is also believed that at the time, portions of the property were zoned local Business (C-i), such rezoning was granted with the under- standing that development of this parcel be restricted to less intense uses than now appears to be desired by the developer. IN CONSIDERING BOTH THE INTENT OF THE PAST REZONINGS, AND THE ADVERSE IMPACT OF HEAVY COMMERCIAL USE WILL HAVE ON THE GENERAL AREA, PLANNING STAFF IS OF THE OPINION THAT THIS REQUEST SHOULD BE DENIED. CASE HISTORY PAST COmmISSION AND BOARD ACTION FOR THIS REQUEST: ?.C. 11 19 7~:~ Deferred this request for furt~er~ study.~ The. applicant agreed to meet~ with the Planning Staff and area opposition to discuss the possibility of amending the application to seek a Conditional Use for Planned Development as opposed to Conventional rezoning. As a result of this deferral, Staff met with the applicant and his repre- senatives as well as represenatives of area property owners. Permitting appropriate uses and their arrangement on a Master Site Plan were II ~ it 401, B-I :-B-i & B-2 to B-3 Scale: 1"=600' Shee,t \II / ,4 TAKE NOTICE That the Board of Supervisor~Chesterfield County will, on Wednesday, April 23, lg75, beginning at[2:Ol~P.M., in the County Board Room at Chesterfield Courthouse, Virg~l'rl'~, take under consideration the rezoning and the granting of Conditional Uses on the parcels of land described herein. Copies of these amendments are on file in the Planning Department, Room 307, Office Building, Chesterfield Courthouse, Chesterfield, Virginia, for public examination between the hours of 8:30 A.M. and 5:00 P.M. of each regular business day. APPLICANT AND/OR AGENT MUST BE PRESENT AT HEARING All persons favoring or opposing the granting of the above requests are invited to appear at the time and place herein stated. Stanley R. Balderson, Jr. Chief Planner B.S. - April 23, 1975 *74S157 In Midlothian Magisterial District Consolidated Sales Co., Inc. Jrequests the rezoning from Convenience Business (B-l) and Community Busi- ness (B-2) to General Business (B-3) of a parcel of land of irregular shape, containing 33 acres, fronting approx. 1200 ft. on Huguenot Road, also fronting approx. 800 ft. on Robious Road, and being located in the south quadrant of the intersection of the aforementioned roads. T.M. 8-16 (1) 5 (Sheet 2). 75S038 In Clover Hill Magisterial District JJH Corporation requests re- zoning from Agricultural (Al to Residential (R-9) of 3 parcels of land containing ll.8 acres; parcel A fronts 220 ft. on Reams Rd. and is locat- ed approx. 1500 ft. southeast of its intersection with Rosegill Road; parcel B fronts 195 ft. on Reams Rd. and is located approx. 650 ft. southeast of its intersection with Rosegill Rd.; parcel C is located approx. 1250 ft. off the northeast line of Reams Rd. measured from a point 650 ft. southeast of the intersection of Reams Rd. and Rosegill Rd. T.M. 28-9 (1) 2, 4, 7, ll & 12 (Sheet 8). 75S03g In Clover Hill Magisterial District Investment Associates requests rezoning from Agricultural (Al to Residential (R-15) a 5.57 acre parcel located at the southeast terminus of Loch Braemar Drive and being bounded on the south by Gregory Pond. T.M. 39-13 (1) 3, 4 & 5 (Sheet 14). ,/~._~5S041 In Dale Magisterial District Latane T. Jenkins requests rezoning ~-F~'~ ~gricultural (Al to Residential (R-25) of a 25 acre parcel fronting approx. 450 ft. on Woodpecker Road and being located approx. 400 ft. southeast of its intersection with Bundle Road. T.M, lll (1) 30 (Sheet 30)~ 75S042 In Clover Hill Magisterial District Professional Builders, Inc. requests rezoning from General Business (B-3) to Agricultural (Al plus a Conditional Use to permit the construction of a mini-warehouse facility on a 3 acre parcel fronting approx. 50 ft. on Midlothian Turnpike, extend- ing southwardly 436 ft., the parcel then having a width of 337 ft. and extending to a depth of approx., 480 ft. and the entrance to the parcel being located approx. 450 ft.~ast of the intersection of Ruthers Road and Midlothian Turnpike. T.M. 18-16 (1) 12 (Sheet 8). ~)~5~044 In Bermuda Magisterial District Billy D. & Peggy L. Walters request rezoning from Community Business (B-2) to General Business (B-3) of a .50 acre parcel fronting approx. 70 ft. on Chester Rd. and being located approx. 300 ft. south of its intersection with Centralia Rd., and better known as 10301 Chester Rd. T.M. 97-6 (1) 15 (Sheet 32). 75S045 In Dale Mag. Dist. J. H. Martin & Sons Contractors, Inc. requests }~an amendment of Condition No. 1 in rezoning case #74S042 to permit park- ing in a lO0 ft. buffer area which shall be set back no less than 50 ft. from the front property line, on a 3.5 acre parcel fronting approx. 575 ft. on Iron Bridge Rd. and being located approx. 250 ft. northeast of the intersection of Iron Bridge Rd, and Canasta Dr. T.M. 66-1 (1) 3 (Sheet 22). wThis case was deferred by the Board of Supervisors at a previous meeting to their April 23, 1975 meeting. B.S. - April 23, 1975 75S046 In Midlothian Mag. Dist. Maryland Coal and Coke Company requests a Conditional Use to permit use of an existing structure for an office building in an Agricultural (A) District on a 5.78 acre parcel fronting approx. 70 ft. on Hallsboro Rd. and being located approx. 2000 ft. north of the intersection of Hallsboro Rd. and Mt. Merman Rd. T.M 23 (1) 4-6 (Sheet 5). 75S047 In Clover Hill Mag. Dist. Thomas L. Daniel requests a Conditional rD'se to permit the operation of a Truck Terminal in a Light Industrial (M-l) District on a one acre parcel fronting approx. 200 ft. on Turner Rd. and being located approx. 200 ft. north of the intersection of Turner Rd. and Walmsley Blvd. T.M. 40-2 (1) 12 (Sheet 15). 75S048 In Clover Hill Mag. Dist. C. J. Hubbard requests a Conditional ~Use to permit the continued operation of a Turkey Shoot on a lO acre par- cel fronting approx. 400 ft. on Courthouse Rd. and being located approx. 2700 ft. northwest of its intersection with Hull Street Rd. T.M. 49-2 (1) 2 (Sheet 14). ~ 7~.o pin Midlothian Mag. Dist. James A. Morrison requests a Conditional ermit the construction of a two-family dwelling in a Residential ,_w~J~15) District on a .72 acre parcel fronting 140 ft. on Brown Rd., also jJJw~/~Tronting 225 ft. on Kennerly Rd., and being located in the southwest quadrant of the intersection of the aforementioned roads. Refer to Bon Air Manor, Blk. B, lot 5 (Sheet 8). 75S050 In Clover Hill Mag. Dist. Julian Temple requests a Conditional Use to permit the operation of a Boat Sales Business in an Agricultural (A) District on a .70 acre parcel fronting approx. 120 ft. on Midlothtan Turnpike and being located approx. 1200 ft. west of its intersection with Wadsworth Dr., and better known as 8911Midlothian Turnpike. T.M. 28-2 (1) 4 (Sheet 8).,, 'C 1. e r F 75S051 In Uill ~ag. D!s~t. Herbert C. Johnson requests a Condi- tional Use .~:~ : -~,~ ~Jc'~c,~,..~ to permit a second dwelling on a 4 acre parcel fronting approx. 225 ft. on Claypoint Rd. and being located 900 ft. south of the intersection of Bailey Bridge Rd. and Claypoint Rd., and better known as 5105 Claypoint Rd. T.M. 63 (1) 5 (Sheet 21). plan kas been presented with the rezoning application. This plan indicates that an access road would extend southwesterly through the parcel and serve the proposed development. Plan- ning Staff is of the opinion that this access road should stub adacent property to the south; however, further consideration and appropriate recommendations will be made at the time the tentative subdivision plan is reviewed by the Commission. GENERAL PLAN: Vacant/Agricultural development of the area encom- passing the parcel in question. STAFF ANALYSIS AND RECOMMENDATION: The rezoning requested and the development indicated is in' keeping with the general development pattern anticipated fbr this area of the county. C.P.C. 3 18 CASE HISTORY AND PAST COMMISSION AND BOARD ACTION FOR THIS REQUEST 75: Approval of the request is recommended. April 23, 1975 (B.S.) March - ~187-~97'$--~P~e~. ~ CASE NO. 75SO41 APPLICATION: Latane T. Jenkins REQUEST: The rezoning from Agricultural (A) to Residential (R-25). PROPOSED USE: Single family subdivision (Beach Estates). TAX MAP IDENTIFICATION: Dale Magisteria'l District Tax Map 111 (1) 30 (Sheet 30). GENERAL LOCATION: Southeast of the intersection of Bundle and Woodpecker Roads. ACREAGE (SUBJECT PARCEL): 22.30 acres. EXISTING ZONING: Agricultural (A). EXITING LAND USE (SUBJECT PARCEL): Vacant and wooded. ADJACENT AND AREA ZONING AND LAND USE: All adjacent property is zoned Agricultural. (A) and remains either vacant and wooded or is occupied by single family dwellings on individual parcels. Prop- erty to the southeast and east of the request parcel is part of Pocahontas State Park. UTILITIES: Public water and sewer is not available to the site. It is recommended that the applicant meet with the Engineering Depart- ment to discuss the possible use of a central well system. SOIL PROFILE: Low acreas in the parcel are poorly suited for housing. Po~entiai for development is low unless public water is made available. DRAINAGE AND EROSION: The parcel drains towards Swift Creek, and it is noted that some areas are poorly drained. An erosion control plan will have to be approved prior to any clearing or grading. REQUIRED OFF-SITE EASEMENTS: An off-site drainage easement may be required. PUBLIC FACILITIES: Development of the parcel by the use intended should cause no detrimental impact to either existing'or future area public facilities. TRANSPOF. TATION AND TR~3FIC: ~t is proposed that ~he parce'l ~n qUestion be subdivided for single family use. A preliminary tentative (over) 75S0ql A to R-25 Scale 1"= 600' Sheet 30 I! ,PLANNING DEPT. GENERAL PLAN: Commercial development of the area encompassing the parcel in question. STAFF ANALYSIS AND RECOMMENDATION: Generally speaking this area has not developed to its full commercial potential; when such development occurs, it is expected that a reasonable buffer and line of demarcation between commercial and residentiaI/agricuIturai land use .should be established. Great Branch, a tributary of Proctor's Creek, forms the eastern border of the parcel in question as well as the border for adjacent properties. The creek crosses Chester Road approximately 800 feet south of the request parcel. It should be noted that Community Business (B-2) zoning currently exists on the west side of Chester Road and extends to a depth of 600 feet south of the parcel. In considering the existing zoning and physical features natural to the area, it is reason- able to assume that the extension of commercial zoning and its resulting land use should generally be controlled to the south and east by the limits of Great Branch. In addition, the rear portions of the properties facing Chester Road and backing to Great Branch should also be buffered in order to protect loWer intensity land uses which might be developed east of the creek. The parcel in question extends to a depth approximately 550 feet. As indicated by drawings submitted with the application, the applicant intends to use only the front portion of the parcel (approximately the first 200 feet). This being the case, Staff would recommend that a buffer of no less than 50 feet be'provided from the west line of the creek. CASE HISTORY AND PAST COMMISSION AND BOARD ACTION FOR THIS REQUEST C.P.C. 3 18 75: Approval of this request is recommended, subject to a buffer strip being provided-running the width of the entire parcel. This buffer shall have a depth of not less than 50 feet being measured from the west line of Great Branch. The buffer shall be left in a natural state. April 23, 1975 (B.S.) March-t8~, .. 1-975--/P~-~- CASE NUMBER: 75S044 APPLICANT: Billy D. & Peggy L. Walters REQUEST: Rezoning from Community Business (B-2) to General Business (B-3). PROPOSED USE: Automobile body, fender, painting and repair shop. TAX MAP IDENTIFICATION: In Bermuda Magisterial District; Tax Map Sec. 97-6 (1) Parcel 15 (Sheet 32). GENERAL LOCATION: Fronting the east line of Chester Road, south of the intersection of Chester and Centralia Roads. ACREAGE (SUBJECT PARCEL): Approximately 1/2 acre. EXISTING ZONING: Community Business (B-2). EXISTING LAND USE (SUBJECT PARCEL): Vacant and partially wooded. ADJACENT AND AREA, ZONING AND LAND USE: Adjacent property to the north and west is zoned Community Business (B-2) while property to the south and east is zoned Agricultural (A). Property to the west is occupied by an existing automobile body and fender shop (part of the applicant's overall operation}. Property to the north is occupied by a rope company, property to the south is ~occupied by a single family dwelling and property to the east is vacant and undeveloped. UTILITIES: Public water is available and would be required in the development of this site. Public sewer is not available. SOIL PROFILE: Soils on this parcel are poorly drained with a seasonal water table and depths ranging from 6 to 18 inches. Wet soils will cause delays in construction and possible foun- dation failures. DRAINAGE AND EROSION: The parcel drains towards Proctor's Creek and particular measures will have to be taken to protect the creek at the rear of the property. Straw bales should be used to protect against siltation. REQUIRED OFF-SITE EASEMENTS: No off-site easements will be required. PUBLIC FACILITIES: 'Development of the parcel for the proposed use should have little or no impact on either existing or future area public facilities. TRANSPORTATION AND TRAFFIC: Access to the parcel would be from Chester Road. (over) M./ Illlllllllllllllllllll I!1111111111 E IIIIlllllllllllllll / / II '1 75S0~ ~ B-2 to B-3 ~ Scale 1"= 600' Sheet 32 ~ {3O 0 3:- C~ 0 0 C~ -0 0 :;ID' BOARD OF SUPERVISORS COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD AGENDA April 23, 1975 9:00 a.m. t0:00 a.m~ 11:00 a.m. 11:30 12:00 Noon 2:00 p.m. III. IV. V. VI. VII. VIII. IX. X. XI. XII. XIII. XIV. XV. XVI. Approval of Minutes Water Control Board and Corps of Engineers on Appomattox County Engineer Drainage Study UMTA Section 5 Agreement Capital Area Agency on Aging - Vacancy Game Claims Erroneous Tax Claims Mrs. Knoop - Report on Midlothian Library Petition on Library Mr. William Cox to Speak on Pornography and Increase in VEPCO Rates~ Budget Request of George W. Moore, Jr. Bid on Police Van Recommendation on Money Lending License Tax LUNCH Zoning Miscellaneous Matters Proposed Library, MidlOthian 1975/76 Branch Assistants Assistant 7;776 76 Lib{ 'an [ce Travel Mileage VLA COnference Workshop Furniture 5.Fixtures ,4~Desks 4 Chairs 5 ~°k ~rucks 6 £ik :st~p stools Libra~/ $10,368' 5,232 3,000 4,568 1/2 position and to: move 40 hrs. Per Week $2.00. Ja . is' 1 76 $2.:( $-" i00' 480 200 500.' 100 200 · '9,000 $1o,2So Office Equipment "CorrehtionaI" typewriter Typing'T V .le ~e~spaper Rack, 600 SO 300 50 50 Instant Library -' Alternative to Renting Bro~Dart, Inc. offers instant libraries in two sizes 12' X 50', which houses 4,700 volumes for $31,000 and 12' X 60', which houses 6,.100 volumes and costs $$$,000. These prices include furniture, shelving, toilets, carpets or tile. They Will' also offer books at $7 to $8 per volume processed. That would be $37,600 for the smaller collection and $$0,.000 for the .larger. One of tlhe most attractive'~features isthe guaranteed 90 day delivery. No. 14 SU JECT. SURVEYING The County shall require that all developers of tentative site plans for subdivisions and sites use County topographic maps, if available, or other equivalent topographic maps as approved by the County. The County shall require each developer to pay the County $10.00 per lot for subdivisions and$50.O0 per acre for all other developments (other than single family dwellings) to be used for tieing the property into the State grid system when the County feels it is feasible. The County shall credit the amount paid for County topographic maps to the above costs. Monuments shall be installed in all subdivisions at all block corners, angle points, radial points of curve in streets, and at intermediate points along streets or boundary lines where monuments cannot readily be seen one from the other. The exact location of such monuments shall be approved by the engineer. The monuments shall be either concrete block at least (20) inches long by six (6) inches square with an iron corner, granite stone with sharp well-defined corners of the same dimensions, or 1" center punched steel rods 36" long. The replacement of any monuments removed or destroyed during the development of the subdivision shall be the responsibility of the subdivider. When a development is tied into the State grid system by the County, all surveys in that development must be based on the State grid system. CONTENTS MEMORANDA SUBJECT NUMBER General Policy for Subdivision Drainage ........... 1.0 Subdivisions and Site Development FTans ........... 2.0 Curb and Gutter ............ · ........... 3.0 Flood Plains ........................ 4.0 Off-Si te Drainage ...................... 5.0 Design Frequency .................... ~ .6.0 Erosion Control ...................... 7.0 Hydrology .......................... 8.0 Open Channels ........................ 9.0 Culvert .................... · ...... 10.0 StomSewers ....................... 11.0 Performance Bonds ..................... 12.0 Road Designs and Construction ............... 13.0 Surveying ......................... 14.0 Glossary ............... ........... 15.0 Appendix A. B. C. D. E. F. G. H. Table of Runoff Coefficients (c) Intensity - Frequency - Duration Curves~ Standard Location of Entrance Culverts Table of Allowable Velocities in Channels Process Diagrams Table of Suggested "N" Factors Subdivision Bond Fora Si 1 tati on Agreement Form SUBJECT: Definition of Adequate Drainage No. 1.1 Adequate drainage must have the hydraulic characteristics to accomodate the maximum expected flow of storm waters for a given watershed, or portion thereof, for ~ specified duration and intensity of rainfall. It. should be. designed to account~for (l)'both off-site and'~o~site stormwaters~ fncluding storm, waters coming onto a given tract from upstream, {2) discharging said water into a natural watercourse, and {3) conveying said water to°a point where it will flow by gravity into a stream, water channel or watercourse, or. where it can be connected into existing facilities of sufficient capacity to receive the same. Drainage structures should be constructed in sgch a manner that they can be maintained at reasonable cost. To facilitate design, construction, and maintenance, said .drainage should meet or conform insofar as practical' to County and Virginia State Highway Department Standards. Determination of the size and capacity of an adequate drainage system shall take into account the planned development in the watershed or affected portions thereof as shown on Chesterfield General Plan - Land Use. The design should not adversely affect adjacent or neighboring properties. Revised - December 10, lg74 · - No. 1.0 SUBJECT: General Policy for Subdivision Drainage It is recognized that the public demand for adequate drainage within and adjacent to subdivisions requires the attention of qualified professionals to the problems of design, construction and maintenance of these'subdivisions: Inthis light; iris desired ~qat engineers seek and apply the most up to date technical infcrmation available and treat every.problem separately in order to cbtain the best design possible. However, in order to obtain a degree of uniformity and orderly development in the County, it is necessary that certain phases of design and construction be made a matter a policy. The following memoranda contains certain specifio require- ments based on State Codes, County Codes, Ordinances, Resolutions and Policies as well as specific standards of the Virginia Department of Highways. Also, certain guide lines for design are set forth; however, these are not to be considered so complete that non-engineers can reach conclusive determinations through their use. As new .and better basic design criteria becomes available and as State and County regulations change, .subsequent memoranda will be issued to either supplement or repeal existing requirements. Unless otherwise stated herein, all work and materials shall conform to the most current editions of the "Road and Bridge Specifications" and the Road Designs and Standards" of the Virginia Department of Highways. No. 3.0 SUBEJCT: Curb and Gutter Curb and gutter shall be required for all new development in all zone districts of R-TH, MH-1, MH-2, Business districts, and R districts with use permits for Multiple Family and Condominiums. Curb and gutter shall be required on all new streets in all R di.stricts in which building lots are established with less than 75 feet of street frontage, exclusive of cul-de-sacs. Whenever curb and gutter becomes a requirement, the County may allow the owner to substitute grassed and paved ditches in accordance with memoranda 6, 7, 8, 9, and 10. For subdivisions, the Planning Commission may approve , the substitution of ditches for curb and gutter at the time of tentative approval. All other requests for substitution shall be handled administratively by the County staff. Revised January 31, 1975 SUBJECT: Flood Plains No. 4.0 General: In recognition of the County's desire to preserve the natural beauty and characteristics of flood plains, it is the intent that this problem be realistiCally handled. The County. p~efert ta~awflood-plains remain in their natur~t state but it recognizes thatwhmever the balance established by nature. .bebveen a watershed and its naturally stabilized drainageways is disturbed that some corrective m~asures may have to be taken to restore the balance and to avoid downstream flooding and damage. Therefore, it is recognized that some improvements may have to be made within flood plains, streams and/or drainageways in such a manner that the increased runoff from changes or improvements within the watershed may be accomodated withou~ unacceptably elevating flood plain or stream levels particullarly within improved or developed areas. This,.may take the form of stream bed clearing, removal of obstructions, reduction of constrictions, stabilization of stream bottoms and/or banks or areas to eliminate or reduce erosion, widening deepening or realigning of streams to provide the necessary hydraulic characteristics to accomodate the anticipated stormwater flow without damaging adjacent properties. These improvements may include the removal of silt and debris which may clog or damage downstream drainage structur6s or property, the filling .or drainage of ponding areas and stagnant pools which are potential vermin shelters and mosquito breeding areas. Recognizing the right of a land owner to the full lawful use of his land and the County's responsibility for the protection of the health, safety, and welfare of all of its citizens,.back water areas maybe filled.when they are not required as safety valves or temporary retention reservoir to control downstream runoff intensity so long as the necessary drainageway is preserved and filled or excavated areas are adequately stabilized against erosion. Oest gn: The computation of flood plain areas {land subject to inundation by fl.ood waters) is to be given consi'deration by engineers who are skilled in and familiar with this particular type of engineering problem. It is expected that all flood plains be based on the balance of energy concept of computing water surface. profiles. The engineer shall submit complete documentation of all computations for flood plains which shall include: a. Topography of the contributing watershed, profiles of the reach of stream in question, cross sections of the stream in question and data concerning any constrictions or control points which may affect the flow. b. Runoff computations based on either the "Rationa) Formula' or other suitable method, c. Water surface profile computations.* SUBJECT: Flood Plains Flocd plain computations will be made whenever the contributi'ng watershed is greater than 100 acres, however, certain instances may necessitate such computations for smaller areas. The computations should reflect ultimate development in .the upstream watershed as shown on Chesterfield General Plan - Land Use in selecting design discharge and downstream restrictions in determining back¥iater conditions, References: 1. "Open Channel Hydraulics" by V. T. Chow 2. "Hydrologic and Hydraulic Analysis" Engineering Manual 110-2-1409 Department of the Army Corps of Engineers When computations are made by electronic computer the Engineer need not submit computations, however the County Engineer should be informed of what program was used and, if not previously approved, a printout of the program should be provided. Where Corps of Engineers Flood Plain Data is available, the 100 year flood plain shall be plotted using the values given for the Intermediate Regional Flood and no floor elevation shall be below the values for the standard Project Flood. 4. County Approval is required for any filling of flood plains. NO. 5.0 SUBJECT: Pol'icy On Off-Site Drainage Improvements A definite increase in the amount and rate of storm runoff is usually associated v~th land development. This increase causes an imbalance in the natural waterways established by nature which must be given due consideration to prevent downstream flooding and damage. In the interest of'the health, safety., an~we.tfa.re, of ~ll.~ when the appropriate land use has been determined for any area to be developed, the County reserves the right to require the developer to show that off-site downstream drainage can be accomodated (cOnsidering the Planned development of the contributing watershed) without damage to existing facilities or properties before such development is approved for construction. The entire cost of off-site improvements will be financed by the developer or the funds for improvement will be obtained by a proportionate sharing plan as established under 15.1-466 (J) of the Virginia State Code. Revised - December 10, 1974 No. 5.1 SUBJECT: Policy On Proportionate Cost - Off-site Drainage Improvements Chesterfield Subdivisil~.nl..~egulations, Sec. 7.2-1. "The subdivider or developer of land shall pay or provide for the payment of his pro rata share of the cost of providing reasonable and necessary sewerage and drainage facilities, located outside the property limits of the land owned or controlled by him but necessitated'or required, at least in part, by the construction or improvement of his subdivision or development in areas within the County where there has been established a general sewerage and drainage program having related and common sewer and drainage conditions, and within which the land owned or controlled by the subdivider or developer.is located; and in which areas a total estimated cost of ultimate sewerage and drainage facilities required adequately to serve the related and common area has been established. Such pro rata share shall be limited to the proportion of such total estimated cost which the increased sewage flow and/or increased volume and velocity of storm water run- off to be actually caused by his subdivision or development bears to total estimated volume and velocity of such sewage and/or runoff from such area in its fully developed state. Each such payment received shall be expended only for the construction of those facilities for which the payment was required, and until so expended shall be held in an interest bearing account for the benefit of the subdivider or developer; provided, however, that in lieu of such payment the governing body may provide for the posting of a bond with surety satisfactory to it conditioned on payment at commencement of such construction." Revised January 31, 1975 SUBJECT: Policy On Retention Of Storm Waters No. 5.2 It ~s the intent of this policy to encourage the use of various methods for the on-site retention of storm waters in the interest of minimizing the adverse effects of increased storm water runoff, (resulting from development of land within the County), on downstream drainage ways such as stream valley pam)~s and natural, flood, pl~in~,. Some m~tho,d~ a~a ~iscus,sed, in the, followin~ paragraphs but new approache-~ to accomplish this are to be encouraged. Temporary on-site retention of'storm water is desirable in many cases to alleviate existing downstream drainage problems and to preclude the develop- ment of new ones. It is mandatory where the existing d~nstream drainage system is clearly inadequate and its expansion is either financially prohibitive or aesthetically unacceptable. The release rate from any temporary ponding area should approximate that of the area prior to the proposed development for the design storm, but adequate alternate drainage must be provided to accomodate major storm flows. The roof tops of buildings may be used for this purpose but care should be taken to design the buildings to accomodate the additional live loading involved and to design roof storage to adequately overtop if normal storage area drains are possible. Retention pools or basins in parks, pqaying fields, parking lots or storage areas can be constructed to reduce peak runoffs downstream by providing temporary on-site storage. Care must be taken to insure that such temporary ponds do not become nuisances or health hazards. The maintenance responsibility will be clearly stated on the plans. Pervious material may be used where practicable as an alternative to. parking area paving, which would allow the storm water to be more readily absorbed by the ground rather than adding to additional runoff. This practice is not applicable to areas where a high water table exists or where subsoil conditions are not suitable. No. ,5.3 SUBJECT: Off-Site Drainage Easements On'all subdivision or other development plans subject to Virginia Department of Highways review, drainage easements where required from s:u~i~isi~n ~t~e,et~ must extend to a natural watercourse, as. define~ on page 47 of the State Highway Drainage Manual. These drainage easements must be described on plans by metes and bounds, including profiles and random cross- sections which are to reflect all proposed improvements. No. 6.0 SUBJECT: Design Frequency 1. Culverts under primary roads , minimum of 25 year design. ~., C~lve~ts under secondary roads - minimum of l0 year design. 3. Storm sewers and open channels- minimum of l0 year design. *4. Curb and gutter and drop inlets - minimum of 2 year design. 5. Flood plains - varies (generally 100 year for residentiali. 6. Structures or channels for erosion ~ generally use the 2 or l0 year design to determine if erosion is probable. ~here a l0 year storm will cause waterto overflow the road right of way and flow onto private property, the inlets shall be designed to contain the lO year s~orm within the right of way or appropriate overflow strutures and easements provided. No~ 7.0 SUBJECT: Erosion Control It i's the developers responsibility' to make sure he is in comT14,anee with the Erosion and Sedimentation Control Ordinance and Policy. All contractors working for the developer shall be instructed by the developer to adhere strictly to all County erosion and sedimentation control requirements, EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL ORDINANCE AN ORDINANCE to amend and reordain the Code of the County of Chesterfield, Virginia, by adding thereto a new Chapter,. Chapter 16A, Sections 16A-1 through 16A-6 entitled Erosion and Sedimentation Control, to provide for control o~ erosion and sedimentation relating to subdivisfons, site development', and miscell'an~ou$ clearing and grading of natural terrain. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD, VIRGINIA: 1. That the Code of the County of Chesterfield, Virginia be amended and reordained by adding thereto a new chapter, Chapter 16A, Sections 16A-1 through 16A-6 to read as follows: CHAPTER 16A EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL Sec. 16A-l: In the further interest of health, safety and welfare of the general public, the County shall require the landowner or developer to submit erosion. and sedimentation control plans. In the event that any landowner or developer shall intend to make changes in the contour of any land in excess of one acre proposed to be subdivded, developed ot changed in use by gradin~ filling, excavating, or the removal or destruction of the natural topsoil, trees, or other vegetative covering thereon under a building permit, site development plan, subdivision plat, or otherwise, the same shall only be accomplished after the landowner or developer of said land, or his agent, has submitted to the County, a plan for Erosion and Sedimentation Control, unless the County has preciously determined that plans are not necessary. Installation of utility lines and improvements shall fall under this ordinance with the exception of installation and maintenance of pipes, cables, poles, and the like on occupied industrial sites. Clearing of land for the construction of a single family residence, no~ within a subdivision; agricultural operations requiring the tilling of soil for each seasonal tilling activity; and ornamental or kitchen garden activities shall not fall under the terms of this ordinance. Not withstanding the exceptions for parcels one acre or less not within a subdivision, and the construction of a single fanily residence not withing a subdivision, if soil and runoff conditions warrant, the County may required the landowner or developer to comply with all provisions of this ordinance, Sec. 16A-2: Adequate controls of erosion and sedimentation shall be provided. The intent of the proposed activity shall be submitted to the County and adequate plans/specifications in accordance with recognized standards for design and engineering criteria. Areas to be disturbed by clearing or gra,d~i~g on~ ~h,ich uns~table or erodible soils exis. t sha-~l~ be specifically indicated. Such areas will be identified by use of soil maps of Chesterfield County or by use of supplemental soil surveys prepared by a professional Soil Scientist. Sec. 16A-3: Design criteria, including but.not limited to that available from the County of Chesterfield and the James River Soil and Water Conservation'District, may be used as a guide by the landowner or developer's consultant in the preparation of erosion and sedimentation control plans/ speci fi cations, Sec. 16A-4: The aforesaid landowner or developer shall post with the County, a guarantee in accordance with the current County Subdivision and Land Development policy. Sec. 16A-5: Any party aggrieved by a decision of an a&ninistrative officer relative to interpretation and application of this ordinance may appeal such decision to the Board of Supervisors. Sec. 16A-6: If required, plans for the control of erosion and sedimentation shall be submitted to the County prioe to or at the time construction plans are submitted. Such plans/ specifications shall be approved by the County prior to any activity. During the planning and construction phases, consultive technical assistance will be furnished by the County, if requested by the landowner or developer, or his consultant. 10/2S/72 EROSION CONTROL POLICY Enforcement of Erosion and Siltation Control'Ordinance Responsibilities and Procedures Engineerin9 Department l. This department has primary responsibility for enforcing the requirements of the Erosion and Sedimentation Control Ordinance; for mon~oring the erosion and siltation control program as a whole; and for specific review from the initial submission to final approval of all site plans and subdivision plans. 2, The Engineering Department will review all School Board and Utility Department projects for adherence to the same standards of erosion and siltation control as required for private developers and/or landowners and will insure that easements needed for proper control are s. pecified. 3. All requests for clearing and grading permits, building permits, and other activities involving clearing, grading, filling and construction will be routed to Engineering Department for determination of erosion and siltation control requirements. 4. Whenever a determination is made that erosion and siltation controls are required, the Engineering Department will issue a grading permit only after it has determined the estimated cost of providing this control and the owner or develgper has entered into an agreement with the County. 5. The Engineering Department field inspectors have primary responsibility for field inspection to insure that the erosion and siltation control measures shown on approved grading plans or site and subdivision plans are actually provided. Fie)d inspectors are authorized to modify the requirements shown on plans where necessary to conform to field conditions or to insure effective control. Major changes.will be cleared through the design section of the Engineering Department. Serve On: Location and Name of Development You are hereby notified that you are in violation of County Ordinance ~ (reference Chapter 16A, Erosion and Sedimentation Control, of the Code of the County of Chesterfield), which provides for the control of erosion and sedimentation of the terrain of Chesterfield County. To Wit: Failure to correct this violation within seventy-two (72) hours from the day of receipt of this notice shall be deemed a default under your agreement. COunty Engineer Date Developer/Builder Date Revised- December 10, 1974 Proce.ss~n~ of Violations In all cases where violations of the ordinance are noted, a Notice of Violation is to be prepared, signed by the County Engineer or deputies designated by him. This notice is to be sent by registered mail to the owner. The Building Inspector and Planning Department will.~ Qn. receipt of a Notice of Violation, insure that alt permits are to the violating developer until they are notified by the Engineerin§ Department that the violation is corrected. Revised - December 10, 1974 No. 8.0 SUBJECT: Hydrology Within subdivisions and commercial developments the "Rational Formula" will generally be considered relaible for computing peak run-off. For large watersheds of 200 acres or larger other nethods Q: CIA Where Q:-Peak discharge, CFS C=Run,off ratio I:Rainfall intensity, tn./hr.. A:Drainage area, acres The run-off ratio (C) shall be arrived at by giving due consideration to the existing or the ultimate development in the upstream watershed as shown on the Chesterfield General Plan - Land Use. The values of C shown in Part A of the Appendix may be used as a guide unless calculations are made to indicate that higher or lower values should be used. The rainfall intensity (I) should be determined from the Richmond area curve shown in Part B of the Appendix. Accurate use of this graph is highly dependent upon the estimate of the time of concentration (tc). Tc may be estimated by using the charts on pages 68 and 69 of the "Drainage Manual" of the Virginia Department of Highways 1967 edition.. Revised 1972. " No. 9.0 SUBJECT: Open Channels Open channels within subdivisions will not be allowed'therein .except under the following conditions: 1. Whenever the longitudinal slope is less than 0.75%, the channel shall be paved. '2.. The COunty sha?T determine whether the channe'l paved to the depth of a 2 year or a 10 year storm. 3. Whenever the depth of the channel from the invert to the' top of the side slopes (when the side slopes are 4:1 or steeper) exceeds 1.5', the flow shall be piped. However,. should the required pipe size exceed a 60 inch in diameter round pipe (or equivalent) the County may allow an open channel (with the design of the channel .subject to the County Engineer's approval). OPen channels within zones other than residential shall be allowed subject to conditions 1 and 2 in the preceding paragraph. All open channels which require paving should be paved with Class A3 concrete in accordance with Virginia Department of Highways Standards and Specifications. Asphalt paved channels in accordance wi th Virginia Department of Highways Standards and Specifications may be accepted within road rights of way only. Channel side slopes which are not 'to be paved shall be seeded until a "good stand" of grass is obtained. A table of suggested "N" or friction factors is shown in Part F of the Appendix. When .computing the velocity of flow to determine if erosion is likely, a friction factor of 0.03 shall be used with the Manning formula. When the paving is terminated in an open channel, adequate safegaurds should be provided to prevent erosion. A cut-off wall should always be proveded for on the plans and should be supplemented with rip-rap where necessary. Generally, whenever the outlet velocity from a pipe.or paved channel is 10 F.P.S. or greater, some type of erosion control will be required~ *Whenever the velocity of flow of the 5 year storm exceeds 2.5 F.P.S. based on "N" : O.03, sod or jute mesh (determined by County) may be used for V5 up to approximately 3.5 F.P.S. based on "N" = 0.05. .If V5 exceeds 3.5 F.P.S. using "N" : 0.05, the channel shall be paved to the depth of the l0 year storm. No. 10.-0 SUBJECT: Culverts A. Culverts at Road Cwossings The minimum size culvert for a road crossing shaT)' be 15 inches in diameter. Culverts shall be designed using the methods. and charts of the U. S. Bureau of Public Roads, Circular Number 5. Generally the depth of submergence of culverts should not be greater than 1.5 times the vertical dimension of the culvert, however, the amount of inundation of upstream area should be a prime factor influencing the selection of the allowable depth. B. Entrance Culvertm All entrance culverts will'be noted on the plans as to size and type of material. All Entrance culverts are to be installed in accordance with part C of the Appendix. All materials for culvert pipe shall conform with the standards and specifications of the Virginia Highway Department. When the calculated outlet velocity for any culvert becomes grea~er than the allowable velocity {see page 172 of the ':b'rainage Manual" of the Virginia Department of Highways, 1967 edition, revised 1972) consideration shall be given .to providing erosion control. No. 11.0 SUBJECT: Storm Sewers Storm sewers as defined in Memoranda Number 14 shall be designed to flow less than full for the design storm. On occasions when the first pipe in a storm sewer is projecting from a fill or extending into a channel that pipe should be designed as a culvert to determine the headwater depth. * When there is a change in pipe sizes at a manhole of a storm sewer system, the practice of matching crowns of the two pipes shall be followed. Generally, a decrease in pipe size in the downstream direction shall not be allowed. The minimum sizes of pipe to be used will be 12 inch where the distance between access openings is 50 feet or less and 15 inches where access openings exceed 50 feet. There shall be a minimum of 1 foot cover from the ~ottom of curb to top of pipe when pipe is in street right of way and a minimum of 2 feet Cover from finished ground surface to top of pipe when outside of street right of way unless otherwise approved by the'County Engineer. All materials for pipes and appurtenances Shall conform to the current standards and specifications of the Virginia Department of Highways. Curb inlets shall be designed for the 2year, 15 minute storm with a maximum allowable spread from the face of the curb of 8 feet. Flow in curb and gutter streets shall not be allowed to cross intersections on the surface when the spread in the upstream gutter is greater than 6 feet. When flow is allowed to cross intersections on the surface, Use shall be made of a valley gutter with a width of at least 8 feet. ll~e spread in the curb & gutter approaching sag inlets shall be checked on a O.OO1 ft/ft slope and where spread is excessive, inlets shall be added. All driveway entrances shall be paved at least 3½ feet back from the face of the curb. The elevation of the driveway 3½ feet from the face of the curb shall be not less than the elevation of the top if curb. Curb cuts may be made at the time of lot development. *On all subdivision or other development plans subject to Virginia Department of Highways review shall have all proposed storm sewer supporte~ by hydraulic grade line computations in accordance with Virginia Department of Highways LoCation and Design Division Instructional and Information. Memorandum LD-72{D)-67 {copy attached). No. 12.0 SUBJECT: Subdivision and Perfo~ance Bonds Each set of road and drainage plans submitted for approval shall be accompaniedby an itemized, cost estimate for the purpose of determining the a~unt of bond to be fur~ished the County. This bond will be due on the dar that the subdivision is to be recorded or {for site development)' when a building permit is to be issued. The cost estimate shall include all drainage pipe, catch basins, etc. all paved channels, road construction items, grading items - stone points, etc., which will be located in a public right of way or easement. Performance.bonds or subdivision bonds will be accepted by the County from the landowner, the developer or the contractor. Where several contractors are involved, the bond will be accepted by the County from only one prime contractor, the landowner, or the developer at the time of recordation. _~heCounty will set a date for the completion of all items shown on the raod and drainage plans. The County will consider an extension of the completion date if requested by the person who is bonded. Bonds will remain in effect for a maximum period of one year after improvements are inspected and approved by the County. If the developer does not maintain the roads and drainage structures prior to final acceptance by the County and the State, the County may have the work done and bill the obligor of the subdivision bond for the work. Revised - December 10, 1974 No. 14.0 SUBJECT: Surveying All recorded plats, drawings, etc. shall have_~t least two (2) points identified by coordinates based on the Virginia State Grid~Ssstem. Where Existing control is not available'-t~e ~ounty ~ngin666 m~y approve the u~'~ of bearings basedon, lrue Monuments shall.be installed in'all subdivisions at all block corners, angle points, radial points of curve in streets, and at intermediate points along streets or boundary lines where monuments cannot readily be seen one from the other. The exact location of such monuments shall be approved by the engineer. The monuments shall be either concrete blocks at least {20) inches long by six inches square with an iron corner, granite stone with sha. rp well-defined corners of the sa~e dimensions, or l" center punche(i steel rods 36" long. The replacement of any monuments removed or destroyed during the development of the subdivision shall be the responsibility of the subdivider, At least two County monuments shall be set in each subdivision. Revised - December 10, 1974 No. 15.0 SUBJECT: Glossary 1. Subdivision Development - See section 16-1 of the Chesterfield County Code. 2. Site Development - All co~ercial, industrial, mUltiple family, or mobile home park development for which a building permit must be issued. Examples would be apartment projects, shopping centers, trailer parks, fndbstrial' building, etc, Culvert - A closed conduit or waterway carrying water through an embankment. Usually consists of a single straight structure of symmetrical shape which has a large ratio of length to width. 4. Storm Sewer System - Lateral and long)tudinal pipes connecting a series of inlets. 5..Natural watercourse and natural waterway may be used interchangably. Natural watercourse is defined On page 47 of the State Highway Drainage Manual. Revised - December 10, 1974 r~ ES~LUT ION WHEREAS, the goals, objectives and purposes of the Friends of :the Ohesterfield County Public Library are to organize and maintain an association of people Interested in the progress and welfare of the Chesterfield County Public Library; and WHBkEAS, the goals, objectives and purposes of the Friends of the Chesterfield County Public Library are to promote the improvement of the facilities and services of the library so as to Increase its value to the community; and WHEREAS, the Friends of the Chesterfield County Public Library tnitlated~ endorsed~ encouraged, promoted and worked for the passage of the 1972, 1.75 million dollar bono referendum for neighborhood libraries for Chesterfield County; and WHEREAS, the 1972 bond referendum for a county wide neighborhood library system for Chesterfield clearly listed priority sites in Bun Air, Matoaca, Ettrick, Mldlothian and Clover Hill as welt as a headquarters but Idlng at the Courthouse, expansion of the Chester branch, and additional bookmobile service; and WHEREAS, preliminary designs for these buildings were in progress at the time of the public's endorsement of the bond referendum; and WHEREAS, the promise was made of land acquisition and detailed designs as soon as the voters approved the referendum; and WHEREAS, the voters endorsed such a plan at the polling place showing good faith In the Chesterfield County Library Board and 'the Director and their intention and ability to carry out the commitment made by the voters of Chesterfield County NOW, THEREFURE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the _Friends of the Chesterfield County Public Library, 3A~ months later, do hereby express their dissatisfaction, disappointment and despair with the handling of the Bond Referendum funds~ specifically the undue delay and vacillation in securing sites for Bun Air, Clover Hill and Courthouse and the possible loss of one whole facility (Midlothian) due to rising land and building costs during the p~riod of indecision; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the above resolution be communicat-ed to the Chesterfield County Library Board of Directors, the Director of the Chesterfield County Public Library and the Chesterfield County Board' of 8upervi sots. Passed this I/~th day of April, 197_5. Secr e;~ar y, Fr.f ends of the Chesterfield County Public Library Proposed Library, Midlothian' 1975/76 104.0 105.0 109.0 119.0 152.0 200.0 206.0 207.0 210.0 214.0 214.1 215.0 215.1 217,0 218.0 22O.0 225.0 226.O 251.0 293.0 294.0 295.0 295. I 296.0 5Ob. 0 3IS.O 319.0 319.1 320.2 403.0 405.0 Branch Asst. Librarian Clerical Janitor Service Pages Advertising Subscriptions Electric Current Fire Insurance Rent Rental ~lachines Repairs & ~aint. Bldgs. [ Ground Telephone Postage Travel Purchase Water Sewage ['reatment Data Processing Hospitalization Fica Retirement County Retirement Group Insurance Cleaning Suppl}es Books County Office Supplie-5 Library Supplies Non-Book Materials Furniture& Fixtures New Office Equipment 15,552 10.368 5,232 3,000 4,368 50 500 ~,000 300 20,140 1,120 50 70O 1,200 600 100 .100 I00 1;000 20O 2,253 850 20O 6O 200 45;000 700 2,500, 900 10,280 ~ l,OSO $13~.673 Agenda - Engine=~ing and Utilities Departm~tnt Page 2 April 23, 1975 (1) /(2) Resolution authorizing condemnation proceedings against the following properties: Project 7032-2 Hugh C. B~arnes, Jr. and Barbara Bo Barnes Offer: $125.00 Project 7032-2 Leon So Cashwell & Alberta W. Cashwell Offer: $125.00 Project 7032-6B Harry B. Wilkinson and Ruby B. Wilkinson Offer: $25.00 Project 7032-6B Agnes E. Spivey Offer: $25.00 Set public hearing date on Chesterfield General Plan - Master Drainage Plan Route 147-Route 60 Discuss request from Mr. Green concerning participation ~y County in correcting pond overflow in Victoria Hills. Discuss drainage project in Shenandoah Subdivision. Miscellaneous Robert A. Painter County Engineer April 18, 1975 April i~, 1975 1~. Roberz Ao Pa~n~e~ County EnsAnee~, County of Chesterfield, Deaz Nr. Painter: The felX~w~n~offers have been made and re£uaed. These o~fers are fo~ a sewer easemen~ agreemen~ on Pro3ee~ No. 7032-2: &~u~h C. Barnes, Jr., Leon S. ~&shwell & Alberta W. C~shwell 125.00 125.00 The f~ll~vtn~offers have been nsadeand reused. ~se o~ero are f~r a never eaommm~ asreeme~ on ProJec~ Ho. 7032-6B: ttazt~. ~lkinson & Ruby B, ~tlktnson $ 25.00 Sever Agnes E. SpLvey $ 25.00 Se~r adviotn~ cnese people of the Board's Action on Honday, April 28, Sincerely, A. ,$ B~lSe8 ~rB/mb Righ~ cf ~ay ~ngineer ce: A. $. Krepela, Supervisor - Mtdlo~hian Dioc~ic~ e: M. ~. Burne~t, Coun~yAdmt~iltrltor Jo~ E. PIcDoN~LD, I~EVERLEY L. CRU/~P i%{cDONALD & CRUMP PROFESSIONAL C o RPO ~-~TI O IV RIChmOND, VIRGINIA 28219 TELEPHONE (80~) 648-445~ April 21, 1975 Mr. M. W. Burnett, County Administrator County of Chesterfield, Virginia Chesterfield CourthOuse, Virginia 23832 Re: The County of Chesterfield, Virginia - Project No. 7032-2/25, Property of Leon S. CashWell and Alberta W. CashWell Dear Mr. Burnett: We represent the CashWells in connection with the above proposed sewer project for Crestwood Farms Please refer to the letter of Mr. A. J. Bridges dated April 7, 1975 to the Cashwells. Please be advised that :the Cashwells objeCt to any further proceedings in this matter on the grounds that the County of Chesterfield is seeking to take a private property right :from them without comPliance With ~11 of Article I of the Constitution of Virginia. This section of the Constitution of Virginia has'not been complied with since private property is being taken from Mr. and Mrs. CashWei1 withOut just compensation being paid. Mr. and Mrs. Cashwell also object to the passage of any County Ordinance in connection with this projeCt which authorizes condemnation across their property on the grounds that negotiations for the acquisition of their property have not been conducted as required by Chapters 1.1 and 6 of Title 25 of the Code of Virginia (i950), as amended. I understand that a proposed County Ordinance to authorize the condemnation of an easement across the rear of the CashWells' property will be considered at the regularly scheduled meeting of the Chesterfield Board of Supervisors on Wednesday,'April 23, 1975. On that date it is necessary that I be in the Circuit Court of Stafford County, Virginia in connection with ithe trial of another April 21, 1975 Mr. M. W. Burnett Page 2 matter. Accordingly, I trust that the Board of Supervisors will be apprizedof the contents of this letter. I have discussed this matter with Mr. Mason, the County Attorney, and by copy of this letter I am confirming my previous representations to his office. Very truly yours, JEMcD,JR/dww CC: MCDONALD & CRUMP, P.C. / ~99'E. /~cD~i~ald, Jr. Mr. A. J. KrePela, SuPervisor- Midlothian District Mr. Robert A. Painter, County Engineer Mr. A. J. Bridges, Right of Way Engineer Mr. J. C. Falconer, County AsseSsor Morris E. Mason, Esquire, County Attorney Mr. L. S. Cashwei1 COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD CHESTERFIELD, VIRGINIA Aprtl 15, 1975 Mr. 14elvtn Corso Barton - Corso &Asso~. 2709 Turner Road Richr, mnd, Virginia Policies and Guidelines for the Preparation of Subdivision Plans and Site Development Plans for Roads, Drainage and Erosion Control (;4emoranda Ho. 9--Open Channels) and (~emoranda Ho. 14--Surveying) Dear Mr. Corso: I have reviewed your requested change in memoranda no. 9 relating to open channels and I feel that the note as shown on the attached sheet will satisfy the objections you listed in your letter of April 10. I do not agree with your suggested change for memoranda no. 14 {surveying). ~asically, you said that all use of County ~onumentations should be on a voluntary basis.and that it was not economically feasible for developers to tie their surveying into County monuments. I believe the suggested policy as outlined on the attached sheet will satisfy your main objections to the memoranda as written. I feel that the County should collect a certain sum of money from each developer to be used for tieing all developments into the State grid system. The County then can determine whether or not the developnent will be tied into the State system at the present time. If the County feels it is feasible, it will provide the developer with control monuments based on the State grid system. If it is not feasible at the present time, then the County FJay wait until a furture date to provide the control monuments for the development. If you have any questions, please call. Sincerely, ....... cc: Hr. R. A. Painter William A. Prostse, Jr. Assistant County Engineer April 10, 1975 Mr. William A. Prosise, Jrj, P.E. Assistant County Engineer. County of Chesterfield Chesterfield, VA 23832 Re :. Policies and Guidelines for the preparation of Subdivision Plans and Site Development Plans for Roads Drainage and Erosion Control (Memoranda No. 9--0pen Channels) and (Memoranda No. 14--Surveying) Dear Bill: We feel that Memoranda No. 9 relating to open channels should incorporate some type of wording that would indicate that this does not apply to normal roadside ditches. Regarding Memoranda No. 14 (Surveying), it is our opinion that it is not economically feasible to tie our surveys into county monu- mentation at this time. This is due to the lack of monumentation. If this requirement were made mandatory at this time, the cost could be prohibitive to some people to have their land surveyed. We would like to have the pight to tie our subdivision work to the monumentation for the purpose of utilizing the available topography. It is our opinion that on large subdivisions most surveyors woul~ do this. SUBJECT: No. 9.0 Open Channels Opeq channels within subdivisions will not be allowedltherein .except under the following conditions: 1. Whenever the longitudinal slope is less than 0.75%, the channel shall be paved. *2. The County shall determine whether.the channeI, w~l! be paved to the depth of a 2 year or a l0 year storm. **3. Whenever the depth of the channel from the invert to the' top of the side slopes (when the side slopes are 4:1 or steeper) exceeds 1.5', the flow shall be piped. However,. should the required pipe size exceed a 60 inch in diameter round pipe (or equivalent) the County may allow an open channel (with the design of the channel subject to the County Engineer's approval). Open channels within zones other than residential shall be allowed subject to conditions 1 and 2 in the preceding paragraph. Alt open channels which require paving should be paved with Cl=.ss ~3 concrete in accordance with Virginia Department of Highways Standards and Specifications. Asphalt paved channels in accordance with Virginia Department' of Highways Standards and Specifications may be accepted within road rights of way only. Channel side slopes which are not 'to be paved shall be seeded until a "good stand" of grass is obtained. A t~_ble of suggested "N" or friction factors is shown in Part F of the Appendix. When .computing the velocity Of flow to . determine if erosion is likely, a friction factor of 0.03 shall'be used with the h'.anning formula. When the paving is terminated in an open channel, adequate safega~rds should be provided to prevent erosion. A cut-off wall should always be proveded for on the plans and should be supplemented -with ri~-rap where necessary. Generally, whenever the outlet velocit~ from a pipelor paved channel is l0 F.P.S. or greater, some type of erosion control will be required~ *Whenever the velocity of flow of the 5 year storm exceeds 2.$ F.P.S. based on "N" = O.03,sod or jute mesh (determined by County) may be used for V5 up to approximately 3.5 F.P.S. based on "N" : 0.05. If V5 exceeds 3.5 F.P.S, using "N" :. 0.05, the channel shall be paved to the depth of the lO year store. **The term channel in this paragraph refers to all channels' with the exception t:]at roadside di'tches are not required to meet this criteria.' Roadside ditches are to meet Virginia Department of High-~ ways criteria on the depths of roadside ditches. I~ I III. ENGINEERING AND UTILITIES DEPARTMENT COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD AGENDA FOR THE MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS APRIL 23, 1975 Presentation of Flood Plain StudY of Appomattox River by State Water Control Board and Corps of Engineers. Discuss Pocono Ground Level Water Tank. Approval of water contracts: (1) W75-30D Briarwood Hearth, Phase II $4,223.25 Contractor: Go P. Clay Company (2), W75-33D Spruce Avenue $5,167.00 Contractor: Stamie E. Lyttle Company, Inc. Report on water extension to serve Mount Blanco. Approval of sewer contracts: (1) S75-19D Briarwood Hearth, Phase II Contractor: G. P. Clay Company $12,327.00 Request for fifteen (15) sewer connections for Bury Subdivision. Consideration of recommendation for extension of time on the following projects: (1) S73-23T (2) s73-25T (3) (4) S73-31T Davisco, Incorporated. W. C. English Stamie Eo Lyttle Company, Inc. Stamie~E. Lyttle Company, Inc. Roanoke Construction Company Request from Co L. Bassett for sewer extension to serve Lot 30, Block R, Section H-I, Salisbury Subdivision. Request for clarification in the amount and method of pasnnent by The Colebrook Company for the ext~ension of the-Midlothian Subtrunk sewer, Contract S74-30T. Consideration of engineering design fee for Bailey Bridge Pumping Station, Contract S73-10CD. Request for sewer service for Gill School.