03SN0242-Aug27.pdfP~0tmST:
uses in a Li
PROPOSED 'LAND USE:
Commercial
STAFF'S'
RECO~A'~ION
03SN0242
Genuine AutOParts
;;i :;' :; :'.-::! ' ,! -.
PAGE 2,-
AYES:
NAY:
. Industrial
PLUG.
MESSRS.
MR. GECKER.
Recommend denial for the folloWing.re~ons:
A. The proposed
Providing
Bo
Co
The proposed uses are not in ~
relative to the location 'and: land area
Street Road frontage.ofthe'°verall site.
Approval of this request i: eould ~set a preeedem.'
development
(NOTE:' CONDITIONS
CONDITIONS. THE
BOTH STAFF AND THE cO~sSION:
RECOMMENDED SOLELY :BY STAFF.
PROFFERED CONDITIONS
The Owner and Developer (the
the Code of Virginia (1950
themselves:and their successors
known as. Chesterfield
consideration'
approval '
void
force or :effect::''
The application comains one exhibit described as f°l!ows:. '
Exhibit 1 ? Plan,titled "Plat
Virginia~ Prepared for
dated Janua _29;2003.
(CPC)
(CPC) 2.'
(CPC) 3..
(CPC) 4.
98SN01'7~
permitted
Any lighting fixture.
Access
No colOr use'din
building.. NO .
2
m-FOX.ON
Location:
Located on.the north'line of Hull Street Road,'east of:RoUte~:288.: Tax.~ 736_680~:P~ of ~- .
4744 (Sheetl6). ~ ~ · ~ ':': -~ - '~ ,;.i ~ili ·
Existing Zoning:
M with Conditional Use Planned Development:-:
Size:
1.0 acre
Existing Land Use_:
Vacant
Adjacem Zoning and Land Use:
The use 'of the public water and.wastewater systems i~-requir~dib~:~i~i!98~i0!76~! ~!~-.
COndition2i°fCaSe 98SN0176) ' ' - ~¥'--. 'i :z':..-'51~?~!'~'~!i!~:!. :(:'i)'!.:',' -~ "':" i-i,! .~!i~;~'??}~;:...-'
The requested amendment will,haveno impact on'these facilities~~
Fire Service:
The Clover Hill Fire/Rescue Station,
emergency medical service
service.
-pIjBLIC FAC~-ITIES
3
,. ~? ii:03SN0242~32UG27);~Bs:~;
Transportation:
In 1998,
199 acres,, generally
360)/Route
project: The subject
199 acre rezoning
related proffers,
with :development that'
satisfied~
The property is
develop the property
to those uses currently
The requested
the maximum
impact, on-the
development will be
vehicles per day.
At time of site
circulation.
Comprehensive Plan:
Lies within the
Transportation Plan
Area Development. Trends:
A mix of Commercial
e:~pected to continue
Zoning HistorY:
On September 24, 198
the Ping CommissiOn;
with .Conditional
(Case 85S 168)
On July 29, 1998, the Board of Supervisors, upon a favorable recommendation from the
Planning Commission, approved rezoning and Conditional Use Planned. Development on
property which included the request site. (Case 988N0176)
At that time, commercial zoning existed at the northeast quadrant of Hull Street and warbro
Roads. BeCause the Plan suggested that the northwest'quadrant of Hull Street Road and
Route 288-be reserved for future-industrial economic development opportunitiesi therewas
concern that the ultimate zoning .in the area not reduce the amount ofavailable indus~al
land.. As a result, the mount of commercial development Ultimately zoned was limited
based:upOn what was already zoned in the area.
Site Design:.
With the approval of Case 98SN0176, a Master Plan was submitted which.divided the, then
subject property into six (6) tracts, The request property lies withinan Emerging GroWth
Area and is located in what was identified as Tract II~B on the .iiPProX~ed Master-P1an.
DeveloPment in Tract II-B ~must conform to the standards of the Zo~gOrdinanceand~
conditiOns of Case 98SN0176 which address access, Parking, landScapings' architectural
treatment, setbacks, signs, buffers, utilities and screening of dumpsters and lOading:areas.
Tract II~B
Tract II-B, which is generally located in the northeast quadrant of Routes 288and
360 was rezoned to 'Light Industrial E-l) with Conditional Use Planned
Development. Uses permitted on this tract include Light _!ndustfial (I, 1))and
Community Business (C-3) uses, excluding any multi,familY-.or toWnhouse
.residential uses. The lOCafiOnofCommuuity Business(C.3) useS~Was limitedtotwo
(2) out-parcels not to exceed..2'.5 acres located in the southeast cOmer.ofthe tract;and
any Portion of the tract on,the east or north side of the ?M~ Site Road,s, as dePicted'
on the approved Master Plan. The applicant is proposing to'utilize an additional~1.0
acre for commercial' uses.
ArchitectUral Treatment:
Currently, architectural treatmentmusteonform to Emerg~g Growth~DiStfiet and Route 360
West standards.
Proffered conditions further require that all bUildings.be :compatible in~chitecturfl style,
materials, colors and details, which predominate ink,ese. Potions of the devel6Pment
(Pr°ffered Conditions AppliCable~io. ~racts II,B, llI iand:~, ~prOfferOd C0ndifi°n 13'~, cm4e
98sNo 176). In addition, t° addro a conCernS arearesi~en~.'and!.~ei~iover Hill ~iSffict
Planning Commissioner relative to the materials'Used t°iproVideSei/eening of golidW~te:
st°rage areas and ground~mountedmeehauicat equipment;:-the~Plieant;Pr°fferedthat'Such
screening walls would be constructed,of the same rhatefials. ~'~ebail~g andthat accesS,
5 03 SN0242-AUG27-BS!.
Signs:
doors or fences on such areas Would be compatible in color, to ~the bUildingwalls:(PrOffered
Condition 3). Further, the .ord~ce addresses architeCtUralc0mPatibiiitY!int~te .overall:
project. Any development on therequest site would Sfil!beb°Und:by~ffi~se'.:~equirOm%ts~.
Lighting: ·
Conditions of approval fOr Case-98SN0176 allowed:'theheight Of ligh~g fixtures-tO:be
maximUm of thirty-five (35) feet~: Area residents eXptesSea conee~i~ti~!fi~e;o~feet :_~:i,
was eXcessiVe. Proffered Condition 2 reduces the height:to :a m~~!!~f~tWentY~fi~e.~(25).
feet. ' . .;':i';-: .' ' ' .:i ": ~
ReqUirements of the Zoning OrdinanCe address sign standards:-. HOwe~er;.arearesidents~:
ex hssed concerns about thePOsSibility of:de¢orati~ebafid~gandn% beiiig:~ed
on the building. To address .~'S~cOnCem, theapPlicanth~pr°ffe~edno h~?ba~ding;~6Uld.::'
be Used and no decorative banding 0facolor usedin the:pr°p°~edSi~:;f0~i~use:~0ulabe
allowed (Proffered Conditi°n 4).: It shouldbe noted idecOr~tiveba~i~oiildbealiowed.,;~
but cannot be neon or of a color used in signage. - - - .-
CONCLUSIONS ' '
The proposed uses do not comply witth.thePowhite/Route 288Devel°Pment?~ea. Land:USe:~eind::,i~
Transportation Plan which ,
the proposed use' is not in
relative to
of the overall, site.- As previously noted, ~hen the subj
1998, compromises were
have been permitted in the area under':.the previous zoning.
economic development land would'be reg~rved for future
decreases the mount of available
further
with the exceptiOn of 2.5 acres adjaeem..to'the m~site access:
request could set a precedent for ad~ti°nai COmmercial development:~
Street Road Corridor ' ' ' ' -
Given these considerations, denial ofthisrequest is'recommende& ~ - : ~ ' .'
6
03 SN0242-AUG2%BS:.
CAS mszOR¥ ' · .
.Applicant (7/14/03):
The applicant submitted additional prOffered conditions as aresult of Concerns expressed by
a cOmmunity representative and the Distriet'Planning Commissioner.
Planning Commission Meeting (7/1'5/03):
The applicant did not.accept 'staff's recommendatiOn but did. accept the Planning
Commission's recommendation:
There was support present. Th°se in suppOrt indicated the request is nota major deviation
from the original zoning and that it was onlYa.one (!) acre site.
Mr. Gulley noted-the Brandermill Community Association and: area residents support the
request and were involved in. the Original zoning; given how the area has deVeloped, it is:~
logical to continUe commercial develOpment Westward; ~ He aiso noted, X~hile-:the:
industrially-zoned land. inventOry would be decreased by one .(1) acre,: an appliCati0nlhas
been submitted for industrial' zoning on other proper~ in the'area which, if approved, wOuld
increase the industrial inventOry bya greater, mount.
Messrs:-Stack and Gecker expreSsed concernS ab0ut':the.:late submission of proffers.
HoWever, Mr. Stack noted-he Would-suppOrt the:-reqUeSt.' Mrj Gecker indicatedi S~ce
information was submitted tate, .he.could:not suPpOrt a.request to: cOminue commercial:
development in an area designated~for industrial Use without ~g! Sufficient time to ~re~ew
the additional information. He: SUggested a deferrallmig,h~t:be;ap'~r°Priate.. ~ ':-:
On motion of Mr. Gulley, seconded bY Mr. Litton, the Commission recommended approval.-
of this request and acceptance oftheProffered conditionS:on'Pages2 and 3. '
AYES:
NAY:
Messrs. LittOn, Cunningham, GUlley~and Stack.
Mr. Gecker.
The Board of Supervisors, on Wednesday;iAugust 27, 2003, begilmin' g at 7:00 p~m., willtake under ~
consideration this request. ' '
7 03SN0242-AUG27,BS-
APPROVED MASTER :PLAN'
SUBJECT PRC
03SN0242'~ 2-: