Loading...
16SN0704CASE NUMBER: 16SNO704 (Amended) APPLICANT: Sports Frog, LLC, Waterford Park, LLC and Waterford Business Center, LC CHESTERFIELD COUNTY, VIRGINIA STAFF'S ANALYSIS Magisterial District: CLOVER HILL AND 13400 Genito Road RECOMMENDATION e1 ' 1749 7 PowHiTE PKWY Board of Supervisors (BOS) Public Hearing Date: SEPTEMBER 28, 2016 BOS Time Remaining: 365 DAYS CRequest Property Applicants' Agent: BRETT BURKHART� N (863-651-3554) �0 Applicant Contacts: oy BRETT BURKHART -off (863-651-3554) l DEREK CHA (804-874-8440) " EGENITO RD MARK SLUSHER (804-697-3551) Planning Department Case Manager: JANE PETERSON (804-748-1045) APPLICANTS' REQUEST (AMENDED) Rezoning from Community Business (C-3) and Light Industrial (1-1) to Regional Business (C-4) with conditional use to permit multifamily, townhouse, outside storage, public address system, electronic message center signs and brewery uses, and conditional use planned development to permit boat sales/service/repair, model homes and exceptions to ordinance standards. A mixed use development to include commercial, and townhouse and multifamily residential uses is planned. In addition, a portion of the property could be developed for industrial uses. RECOMMENDATION On September 20, 2016, the Commission deferred this request to their November 15, 2016 public hearing. Therefore, Staff recommends that STAFF the Board defer the request to their December 14, 2016 public hearing. Note: A complete copy of Staff's Analysis and Recommendation to the Commission is attached. Providing a FIRST CHOICE community through excellence in public service 16SN0704-2016SEPT28-BOS-RPT CASE HISTORY Applicant Submittals 3/10/16 Application submitted 4/6/16 Application amended 9/6/16 9/7/16 Application amended; revised Textual Statement and Proffered Conditions 9/12/16 submitted; revised drafts of Textual Statement and Proffered Conditions 9/13/16 submitted Community Meetings 5/5/16 Issues Discussed: • Anticipated traffic generation and access • Types of outdoor activities and associated noise levels • Development phasing • Types of uses in proximity to adjacent residential development 6/20/16 Issues Discussed: • Existing traffic conditions and transportation impacts of development on access routes/intersections • Proposed transportation improvements and phasing • Lake construction • Size and impacts of outdoor recreation activities and concert venues • Anticipated noise study/limits • Residential development densities Planning Commission Meetings 5/17/16 ACTION — DEFERRED TO COMMISSION'S JUNE 21, 2016 MEETING WITH THE APPLICANTS' CONSENT 6/21/16 ACTION — DEFERRED TO COMMISSION'S AUGUST 16, 2016 MEETING WITH THE APPLICANTS' CONSENT 8/16/16 ACTION — DEFERRED TO COMMISSION'S SEPTEMBER 20, 2016 MEETING WITH THE APPLICANTS' CONSENT 9/20/2016 ACTION — ON THEIR OWN MOTION, DEFERRED TO COMMISSION'S NOVEMBER 15, 2016 MEETING Board of Supervisors Meetings 6/22/16 ACTION — DEFERRED TO BOARD'S AUGUST 24, 2016 MEETING WITH THE APPLICANTS' CONSENT 8/24/16 ACTION — DEFERRED TO BOARD'S SEPTEMBER 28, 2016 MEETING WITH THE APPLICANTS' CONSENT The Board of Supervisors on Wednesday, September 28, 2016, beginning at 6:30 p.m., is scheduled to consider this request. 16SNO704-20165 EPT28-BOS-RPT CASE NUMBER: 16SNO704 (Amended) APPLICANT: Sports Frog, LLC, Waterford Park, LLC and Waterford Business Center, LC CHESTERFIELD COUNTY, VIRGINIA ADDENDUM Magisterial District: CLOVER HILL 13400 Genito Road 1449 Powkil7E PKWY Planning Commission (CPC) Public Hearing Date: SEPTEMBER 20, 2016 CPC Time Remaining: 100 DAYS CRequest Property Applicants' Agent: BRETT BURKHART� N (863-651-3554) �0 Applicant Contacts: oy BRETT BURKHART -off (863-651-3554) l DEREK CHA (804-874-8440) " EGENifo RD MARK SLUSHER (804-697-3551) Planning Department Case Manager: JANE PETERSON (804-748-1045) APPLICANTS' REQUEST (AMENDED) Rezoning from Community Business (C-3) and Light Industrial (1-1) to Regional Business (C-4) with conditional use to permit multifamily, townhouse, outside storage, public address system, electronic message center signs and brewery uses, and conditional use planned development to permit boat sales/service/repair, model homes and exceptions to ordinance standards. A mixed use development to include commercial, and townhouse and multifamily residential uses is planned. In addition, a portion of the property could be developed for industrial uses. ADDENDUM The purpose of this Addendum is to provide revised Virginia Department of Transportation comments. On September 9, 2016, the Virginia Department of Transportation submitted revised comments which are included on the following page. Staff continues to recommend denial of this request as outlined in the "Staff Analysis and Recommendation". Providing a FIRST CHOICE community through excellence in public service VDOT Land Use Regulations Traffic Impact Analysis (24VAC30-155) This rezoning met the threshold for the submittal of a TIA to the Department. The study findings dated July 12, 2016 summarizing impacts to the transportation network and recommended improvements are included in this staff report. The proffered improvements are consistent with the TIA recommendations. (Proffered Condition 7) Access Management (24VAC30-73) The proposed access point locations as identified in the TIA are shown to be in compliance with the Regulation spacing standards. (Proffered Condition 6) Subdivision Street Acceptance (24VAC30-91/92) All proposed roadways anticipated for state acceptance are subject to compliance with the Street Acceptance Regulations and Standards. (Textual Statement V.C.2) Land Use Permit (24VAC30-151) Land Use Permit issuance for the construction of the proffered access points and for the road improvements is subject to design in accordance with Department standards. VDOT will verify design through the County site plan review process. Summary Final approval for the construction of a new Route 288 to Genito Rd. interchange is subject to VDOT review. The Department will evaluate through coordination with the Transportation Department. (Proffered Condition 8) 16SN0704-2016SE PT20-CPC-RPT-AD D CASE NUMBER: 16SNO704 (Amended) APPLICANT: Sports Frog, LLC, Waterford Park, LLC and Waterford Business Center, LC CHESTERFIELD COUNTY, VIRGINIA ADDENDUM Magisterial District: CLOVER HILL � 1+, 13400 Genito Road 1 �1+ 1449 Powkil7E PKWY Planning Commission (CPC) Public Hearing Date: SEPTEMBER 20, 2016 CPC Time Remaining: 100 DAYS CRequest Property Applicants' Agent: BRETT BURKHART� N (863-651-3554) �0 Applicant Contacts: oy BRETT BURKHART -off (863-651-3554) l DEREK CHA (804-874-8440) " EGENifo RD MARK SLUSHER (804-697-3551) Planning Department Case Manager: JANE PETERSON (804-748-1045) APPLICANTS' REQUEST (AMENDED) Rezoning from Community Business (C-3) and Light Industrial (1-1) to Regional Business (C-4) with conditional use to permit multifamily, townhouse, outside storage, public address system, electronic message center signs and brewery uses, and conditional use planned development to permit boat sales/service/repair, model homes and exceptions to ordinance standards. A mixed use development to include commercial, and townhouse and multifamily residential uses is planned. In addition, a portion of the property could be developed for industrial uses. ADDENDUM The purpose of this Addendum is to provide revised Virginia Department of Transportation comments. On September 9, 2016, the Virginia Department of Transportation submitted revised comments which are included on the following page. Staff continues to recommend denial of this request as outlined in the "Staff Analysis and Recommendation". Providing a FIRST CHOICE community through excellence in public service VDOT Land Use Regulations Traffic Impact Analysis (24VAC30-155) This rezoning met the threshold for the submittal of a TIA to the Department. The study findings dated July 12, 2016 summarizing impacts to the transportation network and recommended improvements are included in this staff report. The proffered improvements are consistent with the TIA recommendations. (Proffered Condition 7) Access Management (24VAC30-73) The proposed access point locations as identified in the TIA are shown to be in compliance with the Regulation spacing standards. (Proffered Condition 6) Subdivision Street Acceptance (24VAC30-91/92) All proposed roadways anticipated for state acceptance are subject to compliance with the Street Acceptance Regulations and Standards. (Textual Statement V.C.2) Land Use Permit (24VAC30-151) Land Use Permit issuance for the construction of the proffered access points and for the road improvements is subject to design in accordance with Department standards. VDOT will verify design through the County site plan review process. Summary Final approval for the construction of a new Route 288 to Genito Rd. interchange is subject to VDOT review. The Department will evaluate through coordination with the Transportation Department. (Proffered Condition 8) 16SN0704-2016SE PT20-CPC-RPT-AD D CASE NUMBER: 16SNO704 (Amended) APPLICANT: Sports Frog, LLC, Waterford Park, LLC and Waterford Business Center, LC CHESTERFIELD COUNTY, VIRGINIA STAFF'S ANALYSIS Magisterial District: CLOVER HILL AND 13400 Genito Road RECOMMENDATION e1 ' 1749 7 POWHITE PKWY Planning Commission (CPC) Public Hearing Date: SEPTEMBER 20, 2016 CPC Time Remaining: 100 DAYS CRequest Property Applicants' Agent: BRETT BURKHART� N (863-651-3554) �0 Applicant Contacts: oy BRETT BURKHART -off (863-651-3554) DEREK CHA (804-874-8440) " EGENITO RDD MARK SLUSHER (804-697-3551) Planning Department Case Manager: JANE PETERSON (804-748-1045) This analysis is based upon unsigned draft Proffered Conditions received on September 12, 2016 and revised Textual Statement received on September 13, 2016. The applicants' representative has indicated that signed documents, revised application and disclosure forms will be submitted prior to the Commission's September public hearing. Providing a FIRST CHOICE community through excellence in public service APPLICANTS' REQUEST (AMENDED) Rezoning from Community Business (C-3) and Light Industrial (1-1) to Regional Business (C-4) with conditional use to permit multifamily, townhouse, outside storage, public address system, electronic message center signs and brewery uses, and conditional use planned development to permit boat sales/service/repair, model homes and exceptions to ordinance standards. A mixed use development to include commercial, and townhouse and multifamily residential uses is planned. In addition, a portion of the property could be developed for industrial uses. Notes: A. Since the advertisement, the application has been amended to delete the use exception requests for exposition center, stadium and arena. The secretary to the Commission should acknowledge the amendment. B. Conditions may be imposed or the property owner may proffer conditions. If conditions are imposed, the applicant must agree for the proffered conditions to remain in effect. B. Proffered Conditions, Textual Statement and Exhibit A are found in Attachments 1 & 2 16SNO704-2016SEPT20-CPC-RPT RECOMMENDATION RECOMMEND DENIAL FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS: Comprehensive Plan. • The proposal fails to comply with the guidance of the Comprehensive Plan which suggests a mix of highly concentrated nonresidential uses that serve regional office, commercial, industrial and industrial needs. The application fails to provide for the appropriate mix of such uses. • Further, the development phasing does not guarantee a sufficient amount of nonresidential development prior to construction of residential uses. Impacts on Capital Facilities. STAFF • Application fails to adequately address the impacts on capital facilities • Textual Statement II.F. requiring the Main Lake and associated walks to be open to the public fails to address impacts on Parks and Recreation and is unclear as to its meaning Health, Safety and Welfare. • Untreated stormwater could be used for Recreational Waters • Stormwater is not required to be treated separately from Recreational Waters • Proffered Condition 17 does not address the health, safety and welfare concerns 16SNO704-2016SEPT20-CPC-RPT SUMMARY OF IDENTIFIED ISSUES Department Issue • Fails to comply with Comprehensive Plan guidance relative to the mix of residential and nonresidential uses • Fails to comply with Comprehensive Plan guidance relative to the type of nonresidential uses. The Plan suggests a mixture of highly concentrated nonresidential uses that serve regional commercial, office and light industrial needs. • Fails to guarantee a sufficient amount of nonresidential uses prior PLANNING to residential development • Proffered Condition 17 fails to address health, safety and welfare concerns • Textual Statement II.F. relative to the Main Lake and associated walks and bridges being open to the public is unclear • Textual Statement needs to be modified to include development standards for Tract C BUDGET AND Fails to adequately address the impacts of the residential development MANAGEMENT on capital facilities FIRE, PARKS AND Fails to adequately address the impacts of the residential development RECREATION, on fire, parks and recreation, libraries, schools and transportation LIBRARIES, SCHOOLS, facilities CDOT Fails to address concerns relative to public health, safety and welfare: • Stormwater used for the Recreational Waters is not required to be ENVIRONMENTAL treated ENGINEERING • Stormwater is not required to be treated separately from Recreational Waters The Health Department is reviewing recently submitted Proffered Health Condition 17 16SN0704-2016SEPT20-CPC-RPT 0 16SNO704-2016SEPT20-CPC-RPT Map 3: Surrounding Land Uses ZONING HISTORY Case Number BOS Action Request Amend prior case to allow 1-1 uses plus a variety of use exceptions, to 84SNO020 Approved include but limited to, recreational and boat sales uses for Tracts D and E 1-1 with CUPID to allow use exception, to include but not limited to, 86SNO117 Approved commercial and industrial uses on Tract C 93SNO255 Approved C-3 and 1-1 for Tracts A and B 16SNO704-2016SEPT20-CPC-RPT PROPOSAL A mixed use development to include recreational, retail, townhouses and multifamily residential uses is proposed. In addition, if Tract C is not developed for townhouses, light industrial uses such as those allowed in the Waterford Development could be constructed on Tract C. The following provides an overview of the development's design standards: General Overview of Project Requirements for Overall Details Project The Textual Statement and Plan serves as master plan and outlines Master Plan exceptions to permit various use and development standards exceptions Proffered Condition 1 Urban or traditional neighborhood design standards will be Development Design incorporated into the project. Textual Statement 11. B. 46% of development, or 48 acres, west of Genito Place proposed for townhouse and multifamily residential uses; and 54% of Use Mix and Location development, or 57.2 acres, east of Genito Place proposed for recreational and commercial uses Proffered Condition 1 & Textual Statement 250,000 square feet of Commercial Space (could include recreational uses) based upon a calculation that would allow some Amount of Nonresidential Uses space to be counted at 6 times the actual square footage Proffered Condition 4 & Textual Statement 790 total with a maximum of 390 multifamily units; Development Number of Residential Units of units phased based on amount of Commercial Space Committed, Commenced or Completed Proffered Condition 3 & Textual Statement 11. C. & 11. G. • As recommended by Bikeways and Trails Chapter of Shared Use Path, Sidewalks and Comprehensive Plan, a shared use path will be provided along Pedestrian Amenities Genito Road. • Sidewalks provided along roads and within development Textual Statement H.H. & 1. Street trees, Pedestrian • Street trees and pedestrian streetlights adjacent to sidewalks Lighting &Hardscaped . Hardscaped pedestrian areas encouraged along sidewalks to Pedestrian Areas accommodate outdoor activities Textual Statement II.J., K.& L. In addition to signs allowed by Zoning Ordinance, 1 sign not to Signage exceed 250 square feet and a height of 40 feet along Route 288 Textual Statement II.N.2. 0 16SNO704-2016SEPT20-CPC-RPT General Overview of Commercial Tracts D & E Requirements- Tracts D & E Details • C-4 uses which include outdoor and indoor recreational uses • Residential uses located above nonresidential uses Uses in Tract E • Brewery subject to restrictions • 1 computer controlled variable message sign subject to restrictions Textual Statement VII.A. • C-4 uses which include outdoor and indoor recreational uses • Brewery subject to restrictions • Public address system as accessory to permitted uses Uses in Tract D • 1 computer controlled variable message sign subject to restrictions • 3 portable message signs interior to project • Boat sales, service and repair subject to restrictions Textual Statement VII.B. Generally Emerging Growth Standards, but modified to accommodate the urban and traditional neighborhood development design required by the Development Standards Textual Statement Textual Statement VII.C. & H.B. Noise generated by uses limited to 55 dBA at property lines or surrounding residential subdivisions Textual Statement V11. F.2. pUWPXELg GHYIY,,,. .. % 1 / / Noise ��✓ Ag""' Y", GXPa � Residential uses allowed above nonresidential uses. Total number allowed Residential Units based upon overall development cap of 390 multifamily units. Textual Statement 11. G.& VII.A. 16SN0704-2016SEPT20-CPC-RPT General Overview of Residential Tracts A, B & C Requirements for Details Tracts A, B & C Multifamily Uses • High quality views of water, landscaping or forested areas • Landscape design includes shade trees along roads &sidewalks, within parking areas and between buildings Development Standards • Sodded yards adjacent to roads, driveways, parking areas, between sidewalks and foundation plantings Site Design Textual Statement IV. B. & 11. B. • Front foundation planting beds Density • Stormwater management and best management facilities as visual amenities • Focal points in each tract Development Phasing Textual Statement III.A., B., C., D.& E. • Architectural elevations to include a 3 layer design with first Architecture floors to be constructed of brick, stone or combination thereof • Garage requirements to minimize visual impact Textual Statement III. F. General Overview of Residential Tract A -Multifamily Requirements for Tract A Details Multifamily Uses Textual Statement W.A. Generally R -MF Standards, but modified to accommodate the urban and traditional neighborhood Development Standards development design required by the Textual Statement Textual Statement IV. B. & 11. B. 22 units per acre, up to maximum of 390 units (Tract Density boundaries could be modified to achieve the 390 units) Textual Statement IV. B. & B.A. See discussion under Financial Impact on Capital Development Phasing Facilities Clubhouse, pool & playground to be constructed with Recreational Amenities the phasing of development Textual Statement W.B. 10 16SN0704-2016SEPT20-CPC-RPT General Overview of Residential Tract B -Townhouses Requirements for Tracts B & C Details • Townhouses Uses • Model home subject to restrictions Textual Statement V.A. Generally R-TH Standards, but modified to accommodate the Development Standards urban and traditional neighborhood development design Development Standards for required by the Textual Statement Townhouses Textual Statement V.B.,C. & H.B. 13 units per acre (Tract boundaries could be modified) Density Textual Statement V.B. & H.A. Development Phasing See discussion under Financial Impact on Capital Facilities Density Clubhouse, pool & playground to be constructed with the Recreational Amenities phasing of development-Could be shared with Tract C Development Phasing Textual Statement V.B. General Overview of Residential Tract C Townhouses or Industrial Requirements for Tract C Details • Either townhouses or industrial Uses • Model home subject to restrictions Textual Statement VI.A. The Textual Statement needs to be modified to require R-TH Standards, except where modified to accommodate the urban Development Standards for Townhouses and traditional neighborhood development design required by the Textual Statement. Textual Statement VI.B. &11. B. The Textual Statement needs to be modified to limit to 13 Density units per acre (Tract boundaries could be modified) Textual Statement VI.B. & H.A. Development Phasing See discussion under Financial Impact on Capital Facilities The Textual Statement needs to be modified to require a Recreational Amenities for clubhouse, pool & playground to be constructed with the Townhouses phasing of development -Could be shared with Tract B Textual Statement VI.B. If developed for industrial uses, the development would conform to the existing conditions of zoning for the property Development Standards for Industrial consistent with those of the Waterford development Textual Statement VI. C. 11 16SN0704-2016SEPT20-CPC-RPT Additional Planning Comments: Mix of Nonresidential and Residential Uses As noted, the Comprehensive Plan suggests that the subject property, as well as the surrounding area, would be appropriate for development of an integrated mixture of highly concentrated nonresidential uses which have a regional customer draw. The majority of the uses should be nonresidential, such as corporate office, commercial and light industrial/research and development. Higher density residential uses are appropriate only if they are not the predominate use, and only if developed in conjunction with nonresidential uses. While the application includes the ability to develop the uses envisioned by the Plan, the proposal fails to ensure the appropriate mix of such uses. Further, the Zoning Ordinance provides guidance as to the appropriate mix of nonresidential and residential land uses within regional mixed use areas. The applicant is proposing a mix of 46 percent residential and 54 percent nonresidential. Based upon the guidance of the Plan and Ordinance, staff has typically suggested no more than 30 percent of the land within a regional mixed use area be devoted to residential uses. Staff has discussed this concern with the applicants on numerous occasions and suggested that if Tract C which is currently zoned for light industrial/research and development uses is either withdrawn from the application or limited to its current zoning through the application, the result would be a mix of 32 percent residential and 68 percent nonresidential. Type of Nonresidential Uses and Phasing of Development As noted, the Comprehensive Plan suggests that the type of nonresidential uses be those that have a regional customer draw. Further, the Zoning Ordinance provided guidance as to development phasing in C-4 mixed use development suggesting that prior to development of residential uses a minimum of 50 percent of a project's area which is devoted to nonresidential uses be under construction. Staff acknowledges that the proposed Water Park will bring patrons from both within, and outside of the county, however, the application fails to ensure that other types of nonresidential uses normally found in a project having residential uses will be developed. The plan anticipates a "mixed use development". Typically, mixed use developments include commercial uses which serve and accommodate the daily needs of those who live in the development. The application allows for all uses permitted by right or with restrictions in the C-4 District plus some use exceptions. There is a possibility that the Commercial Space developed on Tracts D and E will be totally recreational and recreationally related (Textual Statement II.D.). In addition, the development phasing will allow 390 multifamily building permits to be released at such time as Phase I of the Water Park and 20,000 square feet of Commercial Space (which could all be related to recreational uses) is Committed and Commenced. There is no guarantee that Phase I and the 20,000 square feet will ever be Completed. (Textual Statement II.C. and II. F.) 12 16SN0704-2016SEPT20-CPC-RPT Design Consistent with the recommendations of the Comprehensive Plan, the Textual Statement requires urban or traditional neighborhood design standards. Further, the architectural design requirements exceed those normally offered with a residential zoning application. (Textual Statement) Health, Safety and Welfare Proffered Condition 17 attempts to address concerns relative to the water quality of the Recreational Waters by requiring that the "applicant" develop a water quality monitoring and maintenance program based on protocols of the Environmental Protection Agency. As written, the proffer does not state as to whether the program will be submitted to any department or agency for review or approval, or if any department of agency would monitor the compliance with an approved program. Further, it is the Planning Department's understanding that the EPA criteria referenced is for natural bodies of water and not manmade water features; therefore the requirement would not sufficient to protect the health, safety and welfare of participants. Thirdly, the term "applicant" should be changed to "developer". The Health Department continues to review the proffer and comments may be revised. (Attachment 4) Main Lake and Sidewalks, Boardwalks and Bridges In an attempt to address impacts on Parks and Recreational Facilities, the Textual Statement, II. F. states that the Main Lake and the associated sidewalks, boardwalks and bridges will be "open to the public". It is unclear as what this statement means, as it is assumed that the entire development will be open for public use. Staff is unsure as to whether the developer intended to mean that the facilities will be open to the public at no charge, only for viewing at no cost, etc. 13 16SNO704-2016SEPT20-CPC-RPT The need for schools, parks, libraries, fire stations and transportation facilities in this area is identified in the County's adopted Public Facilities Plan, Thoroughfare Plan and Adopted Capital Improvement Program and further detailed by specific departments in the applicable sections of this request analysis. This proposed development will have an impact on capital facilities. Staff has calculated the fiscal impact of every new dwelling unit on schools, roads, parks, libraries and fire stations at $23,418 per unit. The applicant has proffered a maximum density not to exceed 790 dwelling units; which consists of a maximum of 390 multi -family units and a maximum density of thirteen (13) townhouse units per acre (approximately 400 townhomes). The applicant has committed through both the Textual Statement and Proffered Conditions to phase the development of this project. Of the 790 total dwelling units, a maximum of 390 multifamily units could be constructed once Phase I of the Water Park as well as 20,000 square feet of Commercial Space has been committed and commenced. The applicant has not offered cash proffer for these multifamily units. Prior to the release of any residential townhouse building permit, Phase I of the Water Park and 20,000 square feet of gross floor area of Commercial Space unrelated to the support of the Main Lake shall be completed, all as described in the Textual Statement II.F. The applicant has proffered cash for up to 300 townhouse units of the 790 total residential units; the applicant has not offered a cash proffer on the remaining 490 potential units to be constructed. More specifically, the applicant has offered cash proffer payments for townhouses with the amount of the payments being varied based on the number of bedrooms. If the townhouse dwelling unit is constructed with 3 or more bedrooms, then the applicant has proffered $18,966 per unit. If the townhouse unit is constructed with 2 or fewer bedrooms, then the applicant has proffered $11,152 per unit. Furthermore, once the applicant has completed a portion of the Water Park and some Commercial Space (Textual Statement II.F. and Proffered Conditions 3 & 4), the applicant can then begin construction on a portion of the residential townhouse units with subsequent requirements for additional Commercial Space before beginning construction of additional townhouse units. Depending on the sequencing of development, based on the proffered conditions, it is possible the applicant may or may not be paying the cash proffer. Therefore, the applicant is not adequately addressing this development's impact on capital facilities. The following chart describes the fiscal impact of this development on capital facilities. 'Scenario A' illustrates all units not paying a cash proffer based on committed, commenced and completed commercial space as described about in the Proffered Conditions and Textual Statement. 'Scenario B' illustrates 300 townhouse units paying $18,966 per unit. In either scenario, the applicant has not 14 16SN0704-2016SEPT20-CPC-RPT offered a cash proffer on 490 units. Again, due to the phasing plan established in the Proffered Conditions and Textual Statement, it is possible the applicant would not pay a cash proffer on any residential unit. Therefore, the actual amount to be collected could range from $0 to nearly $5.7 million with a shortfall ranging from $9.3 million to $15 million. The Board of the Supervisors has from time to time, in recognition of other aspects of the case, approved cases with a reduced cash proffer based on the number of bedrooms in the dwelling unit. The Planning Commission and Board of Supervisors, through their consideration of this request, may determine that there are unique circumstances relative to this request that may justify acceptance of proffers as offered for this case. Per Dwelling Unit Impact on Capital Facilities ) Potential Units -790)'300) Facility Categories FY16 Calculated Impact Current BOS Maximum (Scenario A) Applicant Proposal (Scenario B) Applicant Proposal Variance from Maximum on Scenario A Variance from Maximum on Scenario B* Schools $9,648 $7,814 $0 $7,814 ($7,81.4) $0 Parks $1,347 $1,091 $0 $1,091 ($.,09.) $0 Libraries $318 $258 $0 $258 ($238) $0 Fire Stations $861 $697 $0 $697 ($897) $0 Roads $11,244 $9,106 $0 $9,106 ($9,1.08) $0 Total $23,418 $18,966 $0 $18,966 ($1.8,933) $0 Overall Impact on Capital Facilities Schools $7,621,920 $6,173,060 $0 $2,344,200 ($3,1.73,030) ($3,838,830) Parks $1,064,130 $861,890 $0 $327,300 ($831.,890) ($334,390) Libraries $251,220 $203,820 $0 $77,400 ($103,810) ($123,410) Fire Stations $680,190 $550,630 $0 $209,100 ($330,330) ($341,530) Roads $8,882,760 $7,193,740 $0 $2,731,800 ($7,1.93,740) ($4,431.,940) Total $18,500,220 $14,983,140 $0 $5,689,800 ($14,983,140) ($9,2.93,340) (1) Based on the proffered maximum density of 790 units, 'Scenario A' which would allow the dwelling units to be constructed, not subject to a cash proffer, based on the phasing plan described about in the Proffered Conditions and Textual Statement. (2) Based on the proffered maximum density of 790 units, 'Scenario B' represents 300 townhouse units paying. The variance from maximum calculated on 'Scenario B' represents the difference of the 490 units not paying a cash proffer. 15 16SNO704-2016SEPT20-CPC-RPT FIRE SERVICE Staff Contact: Anthony Batten (717-6167) battena@chesterfield.gov The mission of Fire and Emergency Medical Services (EMS) is to protect life, property and the environment through a comprehensive fire and life safety program that ensures an adequate and timely response to emergencies. The Public Facilities Plan, as part of the Comprehensive Plan, indicates: County -wide Fire & EMS Service Information & Needs Estimated Number of Calls for Recommendations for Fire Stations New 5 Replacement/Revitalization Applicant's Proposal to Address 4 by 2022 2011 Incidents as a percent of total 1 Fire 24% EMS (Emergency Medical Services) 76% Fire/EMS Increases in Call Volume from 2001 and 2011 44% County Population Increase from 17 2001 to 2011 1 With the aging of population, medical emergency incidents are expected to increase faster than the rate of population growth over time. Fire Service - Project Impacts Estimated Number of Calls for 1561 Service Annually The proposal fails to address the impact on fire facilities Applicant's Proposal to Address consistent with the Board's policy Impacts 2 Proffered Conditions 3 & 4 1 Number based on residential only. Nonresidential not calculated into estimate. Z The financial impact of residential development on fire facilities is addressed in the "Financial Impact on Capital Facilities" section of the report. Additional Fire Comments: When the property is developed, the number of hydrants, quantity of water needed for fire protection, and access requirements will be evaluated during the plans review process. 16 16SNO704-2016SEPT20-CPC-RPT PARKS AND RECREATION Staff Contact: Brian Geouge (318-8720) geougeb@chesterfield.gov The County supports a high-quality park system to provide residents and visitors with equitable access to active and passive recreation opportunities. The Public Facilities Plan, as part of the comprehensive plan, indicates: County -wide Parks and Recreation Needs Park Type Number of New Parks Aggregate Acreage Regional 3 600 Community 10 790 Neighborhood 9 180 Special Purpose 3 i - Urban 2 - - Linear 3 - - 1 The Public Facilities Plan notes facility recommendations for water-based parks. All other facilities are acquired and developed on a site -by -site basis. Z Facilities are recommended in urban areas where there is limited acreage available for park development. 3 Facility needs are assessed on a site -by -site basis as recommended in the Public Facilities Plan. Parks and Recreation — Project Impacts 2012 County Level of Service 5.9 Acres of Regional, Community and/or Neighborhood parkland per 1,000 persons Target Level of Service 9 Acres of Regional, Community and/or Neighborhood parkland per 1,000 persons The proffered conditions are dependent upon the timing of Commercial Space construction; therefore, there is no Applicant's Proposal to Address certainty that the impacts on Parks & Recreation facilities Impacts i will be addressed. Proffered Conditions 3 & 4 i The financial impact of residential development on parks facilities is addressed in the "Financial Impact on Capital Facilities" section of the report. 17 16SN0704-2016SEPT20-CPC-RPT LIBRARIES Staff Contact: Jennifer Stevens (751-4998) stevensj@chesterfield.gov The public library system's role in the county has expanded beyond its traditional function as a resource for information and materials, and now serves as a community gathering place for educational, cultural and informational services; community support during emergencies; economic development; and revitalization activities. The Public Facilities Plan, as part of the Comprehensive Plan, indicates: County -wide Library Needs Facility Action County -wide Facility Needs Expand or Replace 5 Libraries Construction of New Facilities • 5 Libraries • 1 Community Arts Center Libraries - Project Impacts 2011 County Level of Service 0.45 square feet of library space per person Standard Level of Service 0.82 square feet of library space per person Applicant's Proposal to The proposal fails to address the impact on library facilities Address Impacts i consistent with the Board's policy Proffered Conditions 3 & 4 1 The financial impact of residential development on library facilities is addressed in the "Financial Impact on Capital Facilities" section of the report. 18 16SNO704-2016SEPT20-CPC-RPT SCHOOLS Staff Contact: Atonja Allen (804-318-8740) atonja_allen@ccpsnet.net High performing, high quality public schools contribute to the quality of life and economic vitality of the County. The Comprehensive Plan suggests a greater focus should be placed on linking schools with communities by providing greater access, flexible designs and locations that better meet the needs of the communities in which they are located. The Public Facilities Plan, as part of the Comprehensive Plan, indicates: County -wide School Needs School Types Facilities to Revitalize/Replace New Facilities Elementary 16 3 Middle 6 2 High 2 3 Technical - 1 Schools - Project Impacts Average Student Yield Elementary 168 Middle 89 High 120 Total 377 Applicant's Proposal to Address Impacts 1 Not fully offered in accordance with policy Proffered Conditions 3 & 4 1 The financial impact of residential development on school facilities is addressed in the "Financial Impact on Capital Facilities" section of the report. Additional School Comments: After review of this request, based on current total school system capacity and student enrollment the proposed rezoning case will have an impact on schools. Over time this case, combined with other active and tentative residential developments and zoning cases will continue to push schools to their capacity and therefore impact the capacity of facilities division -wide. The School Board FY2017 adopted Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) continues to support the 2013 voter approved school revitalization program that will replace or renovate 10 schools and construct 1 new elementary school to add capacity in the Midlothian area of the county. The 10 existing facilities that are part of the revitalization program are Providence Middle School, Monacan High School, Manchester Middle School, Beulah Elementary School, Enon Elementary School, Matoaca Elementary School, Harrowgate Elementary School, Reams Elementary School, Crestwood Elementary School, and Ettrick Elementary School. Additional information on the CIP can be found in the financial section of the CCPS Adopted Budget for FY2017. 19 16SNO704-2016SEPT20-CPC-RPT COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (CDOT) Staff Contact: Jim Banks (804) 748-1037 banksj@chesterfield.gov The Comprehensive Plan, which includes the Thoroughfare Plan, identifies county -wide transportation needs that are expected to mitigate traffic impacts of future growth. The anticipated traffic impact of the proposal has been evaluated and recommendations are detailed in the chart below: CDOT Recommendation Applicant's Proposal Maximum Development 115,000 square feet of retail, 330,000 square feet of business park, 330 Offered as Recommended. apartment, 360 townhomes, 50,000 square feet of restaurants, and a 40- Proffered Condition 5 acre Outdoor Adventure Park; or equivalent development Vehicular Access Control Direct to Genito Road limited to two (2) entrances/exits; one access will be Offered as Recommended. Genito (the "Main Access"), and the second located towards western Proffered Condition 6 property line. Road Improvements • Additional pavement along Genito Road to provide a separate right turn lane at the westernmost access • Additional pavement along Genito Road to provide dual left turn lanes at the crossover that serves the Main Access • Additional pavement along the Main Access to provide a five lane typical at its intersection with Genito Road • Traffic signalization at the Main Access/Genito Road/Kelly Green Drive intersection, if warranted • A two (2) lane road from Genito Place to Tredegar Lake Parkway • Additional pavement along Genito Road at the Charter Colony Parkway/Old Hundred Road/Genito Road intersection to provide dual right turns lanes from westbound Genito Road to northbound Charter Colony Parkway • Traffic signal modification at the Charter Colony Parkway/Old Hundred Road/Genito Road intersection, if warranted • Additional pavement along Charter Colony Parkway to provide southbound dual left turn lanes at the crossover that serves Tredegar Lake Parkway intersection • Additional pavement along Tredegar Lake Parkway to provide a westbound approach of a 3 lane typical section at its intersection with Charter Colony Parkway • Traffic signal modification at the Tredegar Lake Parkway/Colony Crossing Place/Charter Colony Parkway intersection, if warranted 20 16SNO704-2016SEPT20-CPC-RPT CDOT Recommendation (cont.) Applicant's Proposal Road Improvements (cont.) Note: A right-of-way dedication proffer has been offered for the improvements identified above. The proffer states that in the event the developer is unable to acquire any "off-site" right of way, the developer may request the county to acquire such right of way as a public road Offered as Recommended improvement. All costs associated with the acquisition of the right of way Proffered Conditions 7 & 10 will be borne by the developer. In the event the county chooses not to assist the developer in acquisition of the off-site right of way, the developer will be relieved of the obligation to acquire the off-site right of way and will have to provide the road improvements within available right- of-way. Cash Proffer Policy Reference "Financial Impact on Capital Facilities" Section. Proffered Condition 3 Potential Right -of -Way • An Interchange Modification Report (IMR) to determine the feasibility for potential vehicular access from Route 288 to Genito Road (the "Access") will be completed and submitted to the Transportation Department. • If the Access is deemed feasible, land for the Access will be Proffered Conditions 8 & 9 reserved, unless otherwise determined by the Planning Commission. Any land that the Planning Commission determines should be reserved will be reserved for a period of 10 years. Within the 10 year time frame, upon request by the county, the reserved land will be dedicated as right of way. Additional Transportation Comments: Tract C is located within the Powhite Parkway—Charter Colony Parkway Interchange Service District. Property within the Service District is subject to a supplemental real estate tax of $0.15 per $100 of assessed value. If Tract C is developed for townhouses, notice of the Service District will be required on each subdivision plat (Textual Statement Condition VI. B.2). In other residential areas within the Service District, ,homeowners have expressed concern about the supplemental real estate tax even though notice was provided on the subdivision plat. 21 16SNO704-2016SEPT20-CPC-RPT VDOT Land Use Regulations Traffic Impact Analysis (24VAC30-155) The anticipated traffic generated with the proposed rezoning meets the threshold (>5000vpd) for the submittal of a TIA to the Department addressing impacts to the surrounding transportation network. Summary First submission TIA review comments were issued on March 11, 2016. Second study submitted on June 7, 2016 and subsequently approved. (Attachment 3) 22 16SN0704-2016SEPT20-CPC-RPT Water and Wastewater Systems Currently Size of Existing Line Connection Required by County Code Serviced Water No 12" & 16" Yes Wastewater No 8" Yes Map 5: Existing Water & Wastewater Systems =r Ch-t.1116d C—ty D.P-u t tUd}Iti- s 23 16SNO704-2016SEPT20-CPC-RPT Additional Utilities Comments: Wastewater is available to each parcel either though easement or right of way. Water is directly available to the southern two parcels, and will have to be extended along Tredegar Lake Parkway to the northern two parcels. Since it is anticipated that the development will have more than 25 lots, multiple water feeds will be required. There appears to be adequate water and sewer capacity for domestic usage for the type of development anticipated at this time. Proffers limiting the potential impact of the "Recreational Waters" on the public water and wastewater system are acceptable. (Proffered Conditions 2 and 16) The proposed water park intends to utilize private groundwater wells along with rainwater harvesting to fill the water features (Proffered Conditions 2 and 16). The use of wells to fill swimming pools and other similar uses is currently allowable by County Code. The county water system cannot be connected to a water system using wells and/or rainwater. The developer's engineer has indicated that extensive hydrogeological studies have been performed and they engineers are confident that there are adequate groundwater supplies to meet water needs for the Recreational Waters without any connection to the public water system. The Utilities Department also understands that the backwash from the Recreational Waters' filter system will not be directed to the public wastewater system. The only planned use for public water and wastewater is for domestic use within buildings (such as, but not limited to, residential, restaurants, shops etc.). The Proffered Conditions and Textual Statement include language that supports these statements and places limits on the use of the public water system to supplement the "Recreational Waters", specifically during water use restrictions. (Proffered Conditions 2 and 16) Applicant is respectfully reminded of the following items: • A looped water line will be required and evaluated during site plan review; • On-site water and sewer easements must be provided, as determined by the Utilities Department; • The water and wastewater systems appear to currently have capacity to support the domestic usage proposed with this development; and • Unmetered wastewater or stormwater is not permitted to enter the sanitary sewer system. Utilities Conclusion: The Textual statement and Proffered conditions limiting the potential impact of the "Recreational Waters" on the public water and wastewater system are acceptable. It is understood that further analysis and engineering will be required during the design of the "Recreational Waters" plans to establish more details on permissible quantities of supplemental water, etc. The remaining areas of the development are proposing to utilize public water and wastewater service which is required. 24 16SN0704-2016SEPT20-CPC-RPT Issue I Discussion/Conditions Geography • Located within the Nuttree Branch and Falling Creek Watersheds • Southern half of the property located at 2601 Genito Place (Parcel 1) naturally drains toward Genito Road where a culvert array of six pipe barrels conveys the drainage under Genito Road and into the campus area of Clover Hill High School • The portion of the property located at 13400 Genito Road (Parcel 2) closest to Genito Road also drains under Genito Road into the same area of concern as Parcel 1 by way of a 36" reinforced concrete pipe. The remaining portion of Parcel 2 drains in the direction of Colonial Village at Waterford. Infrastructure at the common property line in which to discharge storm drainage from Parcel 2 does not appear to exist. • The property located at 13200 Tredegar Lake Parkway (Parcel 3) was zoned as a part of the Waterford Business Center which has an overall drainage plan in place 25 r.GENITO RD 16SNO704-2016SEPT20-CPC-RPT Tax ID 730 Reference Prafferad Condition 12 �i mom• 7� 25 r.GENITO RD 16SNO704-2016SEPT20-CPC-RPT 26 16SN0704-2016SEPT20-CPC-RPT Stromwater (cont,) Issue Discussion/Conditions • The area downstream of this site has been a serious storm drainage area of concern. The development of the Waterford Park project should mimic the Clover Hill High School drainage plan by diverting as much of the runoff from the property as possible to the roadside ditches within the Route 288 right-of-way. Lake overflow shall be connected to the Route 288 drainage system, and the area of the project which drains to the lake shall be maximized with discharge rates into the Nuttree Branch Watershed held at or below the pre -development levels. • For the portion of the property which drains to the existing culverts under Genito Road, the post -development discharge rates for the 2, 10, 25 and 100 year storms shall be maintained under pre -development discharge rates. Drainage Proffered Condition 11 • For the portion of the property which drains to Colonial Village, the maximum post - development drainage discharge rate for the 100 -year storm shall be based on the minimum capacity of the existing facilities downstream, as well as the recorded 100 - year backwater and/or floodplain shall not be increased. On-site detention of the post -development discharge rate for the 100 -year storm to below the pre - development discharge rate may be provided to satisfy this requirement. Proffered Condition 12 • There is a 42" diameter reinforced concrete pipe within an easement at the rear of 2501 Waterford Lake Drive which was designed to accommodate development of Parcel 3. • The development of Parcels 1 and 2 is subject to the Part IIB technical criteria of the Virginia Stormwater Management Program (VSMP) Regulations for both water Storm Water quality and water quantity • Parcel 3 is included within the master plan for the existing Waterford Lake; Management therefore, the development of this parcel is subject to the Part IIC technical criteria of the VSMP Program Regulations for both water quality and water quantity until July 1, 2019, unless otherwise extended by state regulation • During the construction of Route 288, several cut slope failures requiring the use of riprap for stabilization occurred • To prevent any potential impact on the stability of the existing highway, additional geotechnical information, profiles, and cross sections of the proposed lake and embankment within the Route 288 right-of-way and the proposed ramp area, shall be submitted to the Environmental Engineering Department and VDOT for review and approval to verify that the integrity of the existing infrastructure will not be impacted by the proposed lake prior to final site plan approval of the proposed lake(s). Main Lake Proffered Condition 13 • Prior to final site plan approval of the proposed lake, a dam failure and inundation analysis for the proposed lake shall be submitted to the Environmental Engineering Department for review and approval. Proffered Condition 14 • The size of the main lake(s) will most likely make it subject to the Virginia Dam Safety Regulations. All required permits shall be obtained prior to issuance of a land disturbance permit for any facility subject to the Virginia Dam Safety Regulations. Proffered Condition 15 26 16SN0704-2016SEPT20-CPC-RPT Additional Stormwater Comments: The recreational waters are proposed on a parcel which currently drains in two directions. The northern half of the property drains to Route 288, which places it within the Falling Creek Watershed. The southern half of the parcel drains to six culverts under Genito Road and into the Clover Hill High School campus, which places it within the Nuttree Branch Watershed. The property is not located within the Upper Swift Creek Watershed and will not drain into the reservoir. The topography of the property does not indicate the existence of a perennial stream or drainage feature to continually feed the Recreational Waters; therefore, the use of stormwater, supplemented with ground water wells, is the primary source for the proposed facility. Untreated stormwater contains solid and liquid pollution which can increase bacteria levels and disease -causing organisms. In addition, potential chemical treatment that would be necessary to provide water quality suitable for human recreation and satisfy health regulations may impact the facility from adequately providing the stormwater treatment required by state and county regulations. Stormwater management specifications and guidance for wet ponds include the installation of sediment forebays at each major inlet, a vegetated safety bench at the normal pool elevation, an aquatic bench just inside the normal pool elevation, and warning signs prohibiting swimming. Sediment forebays are needed to capture sediment laden stormwater runoff from parking lots and roadways, which include trash, oils, greases, and other contaminants. These forebays are typically shallow, collect sediment and provide an environment for the growth of disease -causing organisms. Aquatic benches are necessary to enhance nutrient uptakes and provide food and nesting for wildlife, which may pose additional risks to public safety. Stormwater management facilities are designed to capture pollutants from stormwater, as well as bacteria and other pathogens; therefore, swimming in these facilities is typically cautioned against and/or prohibited. As a result of the overall concern for public safety, as well as the design considerations, it is recommended that stormwater management is treated separately from all recreational waters. After reviewing the applicant's request and Textual Statement, staff cannot determine this concern has been adequately addressed and does not support the combined use of stormwater treatment and proposed recreational activities. 27 16SN0704-2016SEPT20-CPC-RPT Stromwater (cont,) Issue Discussion/Conditions • Public policy and stormwater management guidance does not support the use of Recreational untreated stormwater for recreational purposes Waters • It is recommended that stormwater management be treated separately from recreational waters Proffered Condition Not Offered Additional Stormwater Comments: The recreational waters are proposed on a parcel which currently drains in two directions. The northern half of the property drains to Route 288, which places it within the Falling Creek Watershed. The southern half of the parcel drains to six culverts under Genito Road and into the Clover Hill High School campus, which places it within the Nuttree Branch Watershed. The property is not located within the Upper Swift Creek Watershed and will not drain into the reservoir. The topography of the property does not indicate the existence of a perennial stream or drainage feature to continually feed the Recreational Waters; therefore, the use of stormwater, supplemented with ground water wells, is the primary source for the proposed facility. Untreated stormwater contains solid and liquid pollution which can increase bacteria levels and disease -causing organisms. In addition, potential chemical treatment that would be necessary to provide water quality suitable for human recreation and satisfy health regulations may impact the facility from adequately providing the stormwater treatment required by state and county regulations. Stormwater management specifications and guidance for wet ponds include the installation of sediment forebays at each major inlet, a vegetated safety bench at the normal pool elevation, an aquatic bench just inside the normal pool elevation, and warning signs prohibiting swimming. Sediment forebays are needed to capture sediment laden stormwater runoff from parking lots and roadways, which include trash, oils, greases, and other contaminants. These forebays are typically shallow, collect sediment and provide an environment for the growth of disease -causing organisms. Aquatic benches are necessary to enhance nutrient uptakes and provide food and nesting for wildlife, which may pose additional risks to public safety. Stormwater management facilities are designed to capture pollutants from stormwater, as well as bacteria and other pathogens; therefore, swimming in these facilities is typically cautioned against and/or prohibited. As a result of the overall concern for public safety, as well as the design considerations, it is recommended that stormwater management is treated separately from all recreational waters. After reviewing the applicant's request and Textual Statement, staff cannot determine this concern has been adequately addressed and does not support the combined use of stormwater treatment and proposed recreational activities. 27 16SN0704-2016SEPT20-CPC-RPT If the Recreational Waters are classified as a swimming pool, the Recreational Waters would be subject to Virginia swimming pool regulations. However, if the Recreational Waters are not classified as a swimming pool, conditions to address health, safety and welfare cannot be determined without construction details. However, if water sports are anticipated, the Health Department believes that swimming pool water quality standards should be met. There are no guarantees in place to insure that the health issues that arose at a similar facility in North Carolina would not occur, and in fact, a guarantee is an impossibility. Participation in water sports carries some risk. Although the risks cannot be eliminated, they can be reduced. Naeglaria, the agent which caused the North Carolina death, does occur naturally in some Virginia warm water bodies and, although infrequently, cases have occurred in the area. Chesterfield Health Department agents have met with representatives of the proposed project, discussed the issue with the Centers for Disease Control, and consulted with the Office of Environmental Health Services and the Office of Environmental Epidemiology of the Virginia Department of Health. The representatives of the project proposed increase safeguards, but absolute protection cannot be guaranteed. The design of the Water Park and the treatment plans have not been finalized, so it cannot be determined what requirements should be in place, and whether part or all of the facility would be considered a public pool and regulated as such. There are no proposals from the project representatives to check water quality at this time. Lakes are generally unregulated, although local regulations may be established. Project representatives have agreed to follow public health recommendations, but without commitment to specific details of the design, construction, and operation of the features, it is not prudent to suggest regulations. From discussions with the Virginia Department of Health and the Centers for Disease Control, it is apparent that testing for Naeglaria would not be an effective protection, and there are many other disease - causing organism threats that must be considered in addition to Naeglaria. Upon receipt of construction plans, if the Recreational Waters fall within the purview of Health Department regulations requiring that the waters be tested, all such tests would be available to the public, unless an individual's personal health information is involved. The nature and timing of monitoring has not been determined at this time. If a feature of the facility meets the definition of a swimming pool, it will fall under some of the Virginia Department of Health regulations, which spells out monitoring requirements in a specific manner. If it does not, local regulations and/or a legal agreement would have to be established. If any regulation or agreement 28 16SN0704-2016SEPT20-CPC-RPT included monitoring by the Health Department, documentation from that monitoring would be available to the public. There are currently no local regulations. On September 12, 2016, the applicant submitted revised draft proffers which include an attempt to address water quality concerns of the Recreational Waters (Proffered Condition 17). The Health Department has not completed its review of this latest submission. 29 16SN0704-2016SEPT20-CPC-RPT CASE HISTORY Applicant Submittals 3/10/16 Application submitted 4/6/16 Application amended 9/6/16 9/7/16 Application amended; revised Textual Statement and Proffered Conditions 9/12/16 submitted; revised drafts of Textual Statement and Proffered Conditions 9/13/16 submitted Community Meetings 5/5/16 Issues Discussed: • Anticipated traffic generation and access • Types of outdoor activities and associated noise levels • Development phasing • Types of uses in proximity to adjacent residential development 6/20/16 Issues Discussed: • Existing traffic conditions and transportation impacts of development on access routes/intersections • Proposed transportation improvements and phasing • Lake construction • Size and impacts of outdoor recreation activities and concert venues • Anticipated noise study/limits • Residential development densities Planning Commission Meetings 5/17/16 ACTION — DEFERRED TO COMMISSION'S JUNE 21, 2016 MEETING WITH THE APPLICANTS' CONSENT 6/21/16 ACTION — DEFERRED TO COMMISSION'S AUGUST 16, 2016 MEETING WITH THE APPLICANTS' CONSENT 8/16/16 ACTION — DEFERRED TO COMMISSION'S SEPTEMBER 20, 2016 MEETING WITH THE APPLICANTS' CONSENT Board of Supervisors Meeting 6/22/16 ACTION — DEFERRED TO BOARD'S AUGUST 24, 2016 MEETING WITH THE APPLICANTS' CONSENT 6/22/16 ACTION — DEFERRED TO BOARD'S SEPTEMBER 28, 2016 MEETING WITH THE APPLICANTS' CONSENT 30 16SN0704-2016SEPT20-CPC-RPT ATTACHMENT 1 PROFFERED CONDITIONS 16SN0704 Date: September 12, 2016 The property owner and applicant in this case, pursuant to Section 15.2-2298 of the Code of Virginia (1950 as amended) and the Zoning Ordinance of Chesterfield County, for themselves and their successors and assigns, proffer that the property under consideration ("the Property") will be developed according to the following proffers if, and only if, the request submitted herewith is granted with only those conditions agreed to by the owner and applicant. In the event this request is denied or approved with conditions not agreed to by the owner and applicant, the proffers shall immediately be null and void and of no further force or effect. 1. Master Plan. The Plan titled "Waterford Water Park Zoning Uses" prepared by Rummet, Klepper & Kahl, LLP, dated March 3, 2016, and the Textual Statement last revised September 12, 2016, shall be considered the Master Plan.(P) 2. Utilities. Public water and wastewater service will be used for domestic purposes throughout the development. Non -potable water wells may be used for outside recreational and irrigation purposes only.(U) 3. Cash Proffers. Except as outlined in Proffered Condition 4, for each townhouse dwelling unit, the applicant, sub -divider, or assignee(s) shall pay the following to the County of Chesterfield, Virginia for infrastructure improvements within the service district for the property. Payments shall be made prior to the issuance of a building permit for each townhouse unit, unless state law prevents enforcement of that timing: A. $18,966.00 per dwelling unit constructed with three (3) or more bedrooms, for the period beginning the July 1 preceding the Board of Supervisors' approval of the case through July 1 four years later, at which point the amount will be adjusted for the cumulative change in the Marshall and Swift Building Cost Index during that time period. B. $11,152.00 per dwelling unit constructed with two (2) or fewer bedrooms, allocated on a pro -rata bases among the categories for parks, libraries, fire and roads, for the period beginning July 1 preceding the Board of Supervisors' approval of the case through July 1 four years later, at which point the amount will be adjusted for the cumulative change to the Marshall and Swift Building Cost Index during that time period. C. Thereafter, the per dwelling unit cash proffer amount shall be automatically adjusted annually, by the annual change in the Marshall and Swift Building Cost Index on July 1 of each year. D. Cash proffer payments shall be spent for the purposes proffered or as otherwise permitted by law. (B&M) 31 16SN0704-2016SEPT20-CPC-RPT 4. Phasing. A. Until such time as Phase I of the Water Park and the 20,000 square feet of gross floor area of Commercial Space, as described in the Textual Statement, 11. F., are Completed, building permits shall not be released for any townhouse dwelling units. Once Phase I and the described Commercial Space are Completed, building permits may be released for a maximum cumulative total of 150 townhouse dwelling units ("Initial Townhouse Units"). The cash proffer as set forth in Proffered Condition 3 shall be paid for each townhouse unit until such time as a cumulative total of 150,000 square feet of gross floor area of Commercial Space is Committed and Commenced. At that time, no further cash proffer payments shall be due on any of the Initial Townhouse Units that have not been issued a certificate of occupancy. B. Until such time as the 150,000 square feet of gross floor area of Commercial Space is Completed as set forth in Proffered Condition 4.A., building permits for a cumulative total of more than 150 townhouse dwelling units shall not be released. After the 150,000 square feet of gross floor area of Commercial Space is Competed, building permits for an additional 150 townhouse dwelling units ("Additional Townhouse Units") may be issued. The cash proffer as set forth in Proffered Condition 3 shall be paid for each additional townhouse unit until such time as a cumulative total of 250,000 square feet of gross floor area of Commercial Space has been Committed and Commenced. At that time, no further cash proffer payments shall be due on any of the Additional Townhouse Units that have not been issued a certificate of occupancy. C. For purposes of calculating the square feet of Commercial Space set forth in Proffered Conditions 4.A and 4.13: 1. A hotel shall count as 2 times the actual gross floor area of the hotel; 2. An indoor recreation facility shall count 1.50 times the actual gross floor area of the indoor recreational facility; and 3. A white water park shall count as 6 times the actual square footage of the structures associated with the park listed in subparagraphs c through g below. A white water park shall meet the minimum Olympic standards of 250 meters, 1.5% slope, and 12 m3/s (420 cu ft/s) stream flow. The components of the white water park shall contain at a minimum: a. Boat lift b. Pump facility c. Control room- 200 gross square feet of floor area d. Training center -500 gross square feet of floor area e. Employee center -1,200 gross square feet of floor area f. Operations center -2,000 gross square feet of floor area g. Boat and supply storage -3,000 gross square feet of floor area D. In conjunction with submission of a building permit for residential units, documentation shall be submitted as to the amount of Commercial Space Completed and/or Committed and Commenced, as required by this proffer. (B&M) 32 16SN0704-2016SEPT20-CPC-RPT 5. Transportation Densities. The maximum density on the Property shall be 115,000 square feet of retail, 330,000 square feet of business park, 330 apartments, 360 townhomes, 50,000 square feet of restaurants, and a 40 -acre "Outdoor Adventure Park", or equivalent densities as approved by the Transportation Department. (T) 6. Access. Direct vehicular access from the Property to Genito Road shall be limited to two (2) entrances/exits; one (1) access shall be Genito Place which generally aligns the existing crossover on Genito Road (the "Main Access"), and the second shall be generally located towards the western property line. The exact locations of these accesses shall be approved by the Transportation Department. (T) 7. Road Improvements. The owner/developer shall be responsible for the following road improvements. The exact design and length of these road improvements shall be approved by the Transportation Department: A. Construction of additional pavement along the westbound lanes of Genito Road to provide a separate right turn lane at the westernmost access. B. Construction of additional pavement along Genito Road to provide dual left turn lanes at the crossover that will serve the Main Access. C. Construction of additional pavement along the Main Access to provide a five (5) lane typical section (i.e., three (3) southbound lanes and two (2) northbound lanes) at its intersection with Genito Road. D. Full cost of traffic signalization at the Main Access/Genito Road/Kelly Green Drive intersection, if warranted, as determined by the Transportation Department. E. Construction of a two (2) lane road from Genito Place to Tredegar Lake Parkway. F. Construction of additional pavement along the westbound lanes of Genito Road at the Charter Colony Parkway/Old Hundred Road/Genito Road intersection to provide dual right turn lanes from westbound Genito Road to northbound Charter Colony Parkway. G. Full cost of traffic signal modification at the Charter Colony Parkway/Old Hundred Road/Genito Road intersection, if warranted, as determined by the Transportation Department. H. Construction of additional pavement along Charter Colony Parkway to provide a southbound approach that provides dual left turn lanes at the crossover that serves the Charter Colony Parkway/Tredegar Lake Parkway/Colony Crossing Place intersection. I. Construction of additional pavement along Tredegar Lake Parkway to provide a westbound approach that provides a three (3) lane typical section (i.e., a right turn lane, a thru/left lane and a separate left turn lane) at its intersection with Charter Colony Parkway. J. Full cost of traffic signal modification at the Tredegar Lake Parkway/Colony Crossing Place/Charter Colony Parkway intersection, if warranted, as determined by the Transportation Department. K. Dedication to Chesterfield County, free and unrestricted, of any additional right-of-way (or easements) required for the improvements identified above. In the event the developer is unable to acquire the "off-site" right-of-way that is necessary for the road improvements described above, the developer may request, in writing, that the county acquire such right-of-way as a public road improvement. All costs associated with the acquisition of the right-of-way shall be borne by the developer. In the event the county chooses not to assist the developer in acquisition of the "off-site" right-of-way, the developer shall be relieved of the obligation to acquire the "off-site" right-of-way and shall provide the road improvements within available right-of-way, as determined by the Transportation Department. (T) 8. Prior to any site plan approval, an Interchange Modification Report (IMR) to determine the feasibility for potential vehicular access from southbound Route 288 to westbound Genito Road (the "Access") shall be 33 16SN0704-2016SEPT20-CPC-RPT completed and submitted to the Transportation Department. The IMR shall include information deemed necessary by the Transportation Department. (T) 9. If the Access is deemed feasible based on the completed IMR, the right-of-way for the Access shall be reserved unless otherwise determined by the Planning Commission. Such determination shall be based upon, but not limited to, whether the Access would adversely affect economic development, the construction cost estimate outweighs the benefit, or funding may not be available within the foreseeable future. Any right-of-way that the Planning Commission determines should be reserved shall be identified on the initial site plan (the "Initial Site Plan") for any development within Tracts D or E. Such right of way shall be reserved for a period of 10 years from the approval date of the Initial Site Plan. Within the 10 year time frame, upon request by the county, the reserved right -of way shall be dedicated free and unrestricted, to and for the benefit of, Chesterfield County. (T) 10. Transportation Phasing Plan. Prior to any site plan approval, a phasing plan for the required road improvements, as identified in Proffered Condition 7, shall be submitted to and approved by the Transportation Department. (T) 11. For the portion of the property which drains to the existing culverts under Genito Road, the post - development discharge rates for the 2-, 10-, 25- and 100 -year storms shall be maintained under pre - development discharge rates. (EE) 12. For the portion of the property which drains to Tax ID 730-689-7839, the maximum post -development discharge rate for the 100 -year storm shall be based on the minimum capacity of the existing facilities downstream, and the recorded 100 -year backwater and/or floodplain shall not be increased. On-site detention of the post -development discharge rate for the 100 -year storm to below the pre -development discharge rate may be provided to satisfy this requirement. 13. Prior to final site plan approval of the proposed lake(s) set forth in the Textual Statement, II.F.1. as part of Phase I of the Water Park, additional geotechnical information, profiles, and cross sections of the proposed lake and embankment within the Route 288 right-of-way and the proposed ramp area as described in Proffered Condition 9 shall be submitted to the Environmental Engineering Department and VDOT for review and approval to verify that the integrity of the existing infrastructure will not be impacted by the proposed lake. (EE) 14. Prior to site plan approval for Recreational Waters, a dam failure and inundation analysis for the proposed lake shall be submitted to the Environmental Engineering Department for review and approval. 15. If an improvement is subject to Virginia Dam Safety Regulations, all required permits shall be obtained prior to issuance of a land disturbance permit for the improvement. (EE) 16. The primary source of water for Recreational Waters shall be from groundwater wells or storm water. Recreational Waters and any of its treatment backwash by-product shall not be discharged into the public wastewater system. The Recreational Waters may be supplemented with public water in which case the use shall not be classified as a water dependent customer and the maximum withdrawal rate could be limited as conditions dictate such as during mandatory and emergency public water use restrictions. (EE) 34 16SN0704-2016SEPT20-CPC-RPT 17. The applicant will develop a water quality monitoring and maintenance program based on protocols outlined in the Environmental Protection Agency 2012 Recreational Water Quality Criteria. (UNKNOWN) 35 16SN0704-2016SEPT20-CPC-RPT TEXTUAL STATEMENT 16SNO704 Last Revised: September 12, 2016 L Rezone. Rezone approximately 105.2 acres (the "Property") from C-3 and I-1 to C-4 with Conditional Uses and Conditional Use Planned Development to allow use and standards exceptions as described herein, and as provided in the proffered conditions. IL General Conditions for All Tracts. A. Tract Modifications. To accommodate orderly development, the Tracts shall be located as generally depicted on the Master Plan entitled "Waterford Water Park Zoning Uses" dated 3/3/2016, and attached as Exhibit A. Adjustments to Tract boundaries shall be permitted at the time of plan review provided the Tracts maintain their relationship to one another and Tracts A, B and C remain west of Genito Place and Tracts D and E remain east of Genito Place. Further, if Tract C is developed for Light Industrial (I-1) uses, the tract shall have a minimum of 15 acres. Prior to subdivision plan approval for Tracts B or C, the use of Tract C shall be committed. B. Property Design. Development of the Property shall incorporate urban or traditional neighborhood design standards to ensure integration of uses, and to achieve high intensity and density of development. Development shall include a grid of frequently interconnected roads and alleys, sidewalks and public spaces having a pedestrian scale with close attention to walking distances between uses, buildings with shallow setbacks adjacent to sidewalks along roads, on -street parking where appropriate, and pedestrian -scale streetscape and streetlight design, signs and other similar amenities. C. Committed, Commenced and Completed. For the purposes of the Textual Statement and Proffered Conditions, the term "Committed and Commenced" shall mean that land disturbance, full site plan, all required regulatory permits, and building permits have been approved, and construction has commenced. For the purposes of the Textual Statement and Proffered Conditions, the term "Completed" shall mean occupancy permits have been issued or if an occupancy permit is not required, that the use is open to public where applicable, and operational for its intended use. D. Commercial Space. For the purposes of the Textual Statement and Proffered Conditions, the term "Commercial Space" shall mean the gross square footage to be occupied by those uses permitted by right or with restrictions in the C-4 District excluding the Main Lake as defined in Section II.F.l.a of this Textual Statement. 36 16SNO704-2016SEPT20-CPC-RPT E. Recreational Waters. For the purposes of the Textual Statement and Proffered Conditions, the term "Recreational Waters" shall mean a water facility such as the Main Lake, as described in the Textual Statement, IL F. and which accommodates recreational activities and uses. F. Development Phasing. Prior to the release of building permits for any residential dwelling units, the following shall be Committed and Commenced on Tracts D and E: 1. Phase I of the water park which shall, at a minimum, consist of the following: a. Main Lake: A lake or lakes with a combined minimum size of 13 acres which shall be open to the public. b. Cable Ski: A cable suspended approximately 30 feet above a portion of the Main Lake for recreation. The cable shall be a minimum of 1,500 feet in length and pull skiers in a circular motion. c. Rock Climbing: A vertical structure with a minimum surface area of 660 square feet used for recreational climbing. d. Amphitheater: An open air structure with an elevated stage for entertainment. e. Main Building: Minimum 5,000 square feet of gross floor area for checking in participants, locker rooms/changing rooms, merchandise sales, restaurant and administrative offices. f. Parking g. Landscape/irrigation h. Sidewalks/boardwalks/bridges around the perimeter of the Main Lake which shall be open to the public. 2. 20,000 square feet of gross floor area of Commercial Space unrelated to the support of Phase I of the water park as identified in II.F.1. G. Dwelling Units. A maximum of 790 dwelling units shall be permitted. Of those units, a maximum of 390 units shall be multifamily. H. Shared Use Path. A paved shared use path shall be constructed along Genito Road. Such facility shall be constructed generally as outlined in the Bikeways and Trails Plan Facility Guidance Section of the Bikeways and Trails Chapter of the comprehensive plan. The required phasing plan for transportation improvements outlined in the proffered conditions shall include a phasing plan for construction of the path. The phasing of the construction shall be approved by the planning department. The exact facility type, width, design, length 37 16SNO704-2016SEPT20-CPC-RPT and location shall be reviewed and approved at time of plan review. The facility shall either be located in right-of-way or within a county easement. If right-of-way is dedicated along Genito Road is excess of that shown on the Thoroughfare Plan to accommodate the facility, setbacks shall be measured without including the expanded right-of-way, except that the setback shall not be less than 1 foot from the expanded right-of-way. Landscaping or other design measures shall be provided to accomplish the intent of the required setback landscaping. The facility shall be designed to connect to pedestrian and bicycle facilities within the Property. If prior to development, the county adopts a bicycle facility ordinance that would be applicable to the Property, this condition shall be become null and void. L Sidewalks and Pedestrian Amenities Generally. Sidewalks and pedestrian amenities shall be provided along roads, excluding Genito Road and Route 288, and within the Property to connect internal uses, adjacent uses and the Shared Use Path. The exact location, treatment, design and use of sidewalks and pedestrian amenities shall be determined at the time of plan review. J. Exterior Lighting. In addition to the requirements of Section 19.1-205. of the Zoning Ordinance, the following standards shall be met: 1. Pedestrian Streetlights. Along sidewalks and shared use paths adjacent to roads, excluding Genito Road and Route 288, and as appropriate within the Property along sidewalks and pedestrian amenities, pedestrian scale streetlights shall be installed, as determined at the time of plan review. a. Streetlights shall be designed to enhance the pedestrian character and be compatible with development standards of the Property. The design of fixtures, poles and lamp shall be consistent along a road and within each individual tract. b. Streetlights shall be spaced generally 40 feet on center. c. Fixture mounting heights shall be limited to 12 to 15 feet above the finished grade. 2. Other Exterior Lighting. With the exception of pedestrian scale streetlights and as stated herein, exterior lighting shall comply with Sec. 19.1-205 and the following: a. Exterior lighting shall be designed to enhance the character of each tract and be compatible with development standards of the Property. b. Except for lighting to accommodate waterpark activities, freestanding lights shall not exceed a height of 30 feet above finished grade. c. Building mounted lights shall be no higher than the roofline or parapet wall. In each tract, building mounted lighting visible to the public shall be compatible with the architectural style and consistent throughout each tract. 38 16SNO704-2016SEPT20-CPC-RPT K Street Trees. Except for Genito Road, Genito Place, Tredegar Lake Parkway Extended and Route 288, street trees shall be provided along both sides of all roads and within the Property where sidewalks and pedestrian amenities are provided. Street trees shall conform to the requirements of the Zoning Ordinance. The exact location, treatment and design shall be determined at the time of plan review. L. Hardscaped Pedestrian Areas. Except along Genito Road, Genito Place, Tredegar Lake Parkway Extended and Route 288, hardscaped pedestrian areas may be located within required setbacks along roads. Hardscape does not include asphalt. Such areas shall not encroach onto required sidewalks unless approved at the time of plan review. Hardscaped pedestrian areas shall be designed to facilitate, and include amenities to support outdoor gatherings and activity such as outdoor display of goods sold on the premises, dining, temporary vendors, civic or community events, or seating areas. The areas may also include, but are not limited to, pedestrian amenities such as foundation plantings, street furnishings, benches, bike racks and trash receptacles. Notwithstanding the foregoing, no outdoor display of goods, temporary vendors or commercial dining shall be permitted in hardscaped areas in Tracts A, B and C. M. Fencing. Any fencing shall be constructed of decorative maintenance -free material. Chain link fencing shall be prohibited. N. Si2na2e. 1. Freestanding sign structures shall be covered with a material compatible with the architectural treatment of the tract in which located. 2. In addition to the freestanding signs permitted by the Zoning Ordinance and the computer controlled electronic message signs permitted by this Textual Statement, 1 freestanding sign, not to exceed a height of 40 feet and an area of 250 square feet for the Property shall be permitted along Route 288. III. General Conditions for Residential Tracts. The following conditions shall apply to Tracts A and B, and only to Tract C if developed for residential use. A. Site Design Generally. Tracts shall be designed to provide residents with high quality views of water, landscaping or forested areas. Each tract shall either be designed to protect existing trees or to be reforested upon completion of construction. If the site is to be reforested, plans for such shall be submitted for approval. Alternatively, if existing trees are not protected or if the tract is not to be reforested, the layout shall incorporate strong streetscape and plaza designs and sight lines of architectural interest. B. Landscaping and Architectural Plans. In conjunction with construction plan submission for townhouse uses, and in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance for multifamily uses, architectural renderings or elevations and landscape plans shall be submitted for approval. 39 16SNO704-2016SEPT20-CPC-RPT C. Landscaping Overall Design. The overall landscape design shall include trees that provide shade along roads and sidewalks, within parking areas, and in between buildings. The design shall maintain open views for pedestrians and minimize conflicts with pedestrian and parking lot lighting. Trees shall not be required in areas designated and designed for outdoor recreation. a. Unless limited growing area warrants the use of small deciduous trees, trees shall be large deciduous; and b. Clusters of native species of deciduous and evergreen trees shall be planted or maintained to provide a tree canopy between buildings. 2. Sodded Yard Areas. Yards adjacent to a road, driveway, parking area, or between a sidewalk and a foundation planting bed shall be sodded and irrigated. Front Foundation Planting Bed. Foundation planting shall be required along building facades that face a road, driveway, parking area or sidewalk. Unless otherwise approved at the time of plan review based upon a reduced setback along special access roads or to accommodate a hardscaped patio outlined in V.E.l.d., beds shall be a minimum of 8 feet wide measured from the building foundation. Beds shall include a variety of low growing shrubs, ornamental grasses and groundcovers, and medium shrubs, small deciduous or evergreen trees that provide vertical accents at locations away from doors and windows. Plantings shall be spaced according to standards for each plant species. D. Stormwater Management Facility (SWM) or Best Management Practice Basins (BMP). In addition to the requirements for SWM's and BMP's in the Zoning Ordinance, facilities shall be designed as visual amenities. E. Focal Point. Within each tract, a minimum of 0.75 acres of centrally located open space shall be provided as a focal point for those entering the project. The exact location and design shall be subject to review and approval at the time of plan review. Within each focal point area, a minimum contiguous decorative hardscaped area of 8,000 square feet with benches and other amenities that accommodate and facilitate neighborhood gatherings shall be provided. Hardscape does not include asphalt. F. Architecture. Generally. Buildings shall be designed to impart harmonious proportions and avoid monotonous facades or large bulky masses. Buildings shall possess architectural variety while at the same time have an overall cohesive residential character. A variety of building facades shall be used so as to avoid visual repetition. 40 16SNO704-2016SEPT20-CPC-RPT Residential character may be achieved through the creative use of design elements such as, but not limited to, balconies, terraces, articulation of doors and windows, sculptural or textural relief of facades, architectural ornamentation, varied roof lines or other appurtenances such as lighting fixtures and plantings. To horizontally break up the building mass, facades shall either have offsets across the length of the building or an appearance of different buildings connected together. To vertically break up the building mass, facades shall incorporate a 3 layer design that establishes strong images of the first floor and the roof or parapet, unless otherwise approved at the time of plan review based upon a design that accomplishes the spirit and intent of this requirement. All facades shall have comparable fenestration. A 3 layer design includes, but is not limited to, the following elements: a. First Floor: • architectural focus on building entrance • covered porches with columns, balustrades and molding designs • varied brick colors or design ❑ • tall windows with surround designs • visual break between first and upper floors with soldier course, corbelling, or other similar treatment b. Upper Floors: • facade design may have less detail than first floor • windows with surround designs and shorter than first floor windows • prominent balconies or sunrooms with wide columns having a base and capital • columns support elements of an entablature such as architrave, frieze, or cornice c. Parapet/Roof: • roof with elements such as offsets, gables, dormers, cupolas or chimneys to break up mass • flat roof either incorporates a parapet with a variety of ornamental designs or a mansard roof 2. Siding. Except for doors, windows or other architectural features, the first floor facades of buildings shall be constructed of brick, stone, or a combination thereof. Except for doors, windows or other architectural features, facade areas not faced with brick or stone shall employ shake shingle or scallops, board and batten, horizontal lap siding, or a combination thereof. Horizontal lap does not include dutch lap. Siding shall be cement fiber board with a wood grain, or premium quality vinyl with a minimum thickness of .042 inches. Wood trim shall not be permitted. 41 16SNO704-2016SEPT20-CPC-RPT Roof. Dimensional architectural shingles or better having a minimum 30 year warranty and algae protection warranty shall be used. Accent roofing material shall be permitted. G. Special Access Roads. Unless approved at the time of plan review, there shall be no vehicular access from individual lots or buildings to special access roads that provide general circulation. H. Garages. Attached garages shall project no further than the front line of the first floor living area of the dwelling. Detached garages shall be compatible with the architectural style of the residential units served. Garage door design shall complement the architectural style of the unit and shall incorporate architectural elements such as windows and hardware. A projecting architectural element such as an accent roof or pergola shall be provided above garage doors. L Mechanical Equipment. The view of mechanical equipment shall be minimized through integration into the architectural treatment of the building, or use of architectural walls, fencing or landscaping. 42 16SNO704-2016SEPT20-CPC-RPT IV. Tract A. A. Tract A Uses. Uses shall be limited to those permitted by right or with restrictions in the Residential Multi -Family (R -MF) District. B. Tract A Proiect Standards. In addition to the other requirements of the Zoning Ordinance for the R -MF District, the conditions specified in this section shall be met in Tract A. Notes for Tract A -Project Standards [1] The minimum acreage requirement may be modified based upon Tract Modifications that may be approved under IL A. of the Textual Statement. [2] Access drives shall be those that connect residential clusters to roads. The number of required access points shall be provided prior to occupancy of the specified number of units. [3] At time of plan review, additional access points may be required. [4] A community clubhouse with a minimum size of 10 gross square feet per dwelling unit, architecturally compatible with the multi -family buildings in Tract A; a pool; and playground area shall be provided. Prior to the release of certificates of occupancy for more than 25% of the dwelling units in Tract A, building permits shall have been obtained for the clubhouse and pool. Prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy for more than 50% of the dwelling units in Tract A, the clubhouse shall have been issued a certificate of occupancy, and the pool and playground area shall be completed for use. [5] Perimeter Landscaping C shall be installed within the setback. 43 16SN0704-2016SEPT20-CPC-RPT C. Tract A Other Required Proiect Standards. Roads and Private Pavement. Roads and private pavement shall have concrete curb and gutter. D. Tract A Building Standards. In addition to the other requirements of the Zoning Ordinance for the R -MF District, the conditions specified in this section shall be met in Tract A. mM"1;; iM�� A. Individual Building Setbacks (feet) "' 1. Adjacent to property not within the boundaries of this zoning case [21 30 2. Road 121 50 3. Interior private pavement including parking spaces [31 15 30 feet plus 5 feet 4. Distance between buildings for each story above 3141 B. Dwelling Units per Building (maximum) 80 C. Dwelling Units per Floor (maximum) 20 D. Bedrooms per Dwelling Unit (maximum) 2151 E. Principal Building Heights (maximum) 16l Lesser of 4 stories or 52 feet E. Accessory Building Requirements Subject to Section 19.1-304 Notes for Tract A -Building Standards [1] Setbacks may be impacted by Buffer, Setbacks --Generally, Permitted Yard Encroachments for Principal Buildings, Floodplain, Chesapeake Bay or Upper Swift Creek Watershed regulations. [2] Within these setbacks, Landscaping C shall be installed. A buffer shall not be required adjacent to property zoned for multifamily or townhouse use. [3] To accommodate garages within a building, this limitation may be modified at the time of plan review if a decorative hardscaped area with a minimum depth of 20 feet between the building and the sidewalk to accommodate parking tandem to the garage doors is provided and garage doors do not exceed 40 percent of the length of each building facade. [4] This setback may be reduced to 20 feet with the provision of sidewalks between buildings. [5] A maximum of 16 dwelling units may have 3 bedrooms. [6] Height limits are subject to Article IV, Division 2. E. Tract A Other Required Building Standards. Multi -family Balconies or Sunrooms. A minimum of 50 percent of the units in each building shall have a covered balcony. All other units shall have an enclosed sunroom. The balcony or sunroom shall have a minimum area of 60 square feet and a minimum depth of 6 feet. 44 16SNO704-2016SEPT20-CPC-RPT V. Tract B. A. Tract B Uses. Uses shall be limited to those permitted by right or with restrictions in the Residential Townhouse (R-TH) District. In addition, as accessory to townhouse development, a model home shall be permitted subject to the following restrictions: • It is designed to become a permanent home; • In addition to its permanent use as a home, it may be used as a temporary real estate office; • It is used only to market the development in which it is located and not a development outside of the project in which it is located; • It is incidental to construction activity taking place in the development; • It is not the primary real estate office for the company marketing the subdivision; and • It is not used as a construction office, or for the storage of construction equipment or materials. 45 16SNO704-2016SEPT20-CPC-RPT B. Tract B Subdivision Standards. In addition to the other requirements of the Zoning Ordinance for the R-TH District, the conditions specified in this section shall be met in Tract B. Notes for Tract B -Subdivision Standards [1] The minimum acreage requirement may be modified based upon Tract Modifications that may be approved under IL A. of the Textual Statement. [2] Within required common area, except where lots abut a road, a 10 foot wide common area shall be provided around the perimeter of each group of attached lots. [3] Either a single community clubhouse shall be provided to serve the uses in Tracts B and C, or a clubhouse shall be constructed in each of the tracts to serve the uses in each tract. The area of the clubhouse shall have a minimum size of 10 gross square feet per dwelling unit to be served, architecturally compatible with the townhouse units in the tract in which constructed, and a pool and playground area shall be provided to serve residential uses in Tracts B and C. Prior to release of building permits for more than 49 dwelling units in Tracts B and C, building permits shall have been obtained for the clubhouse and pool. Prior to issuance of building permits for more than 98 dwelling units in Tracts B and C, the clubhouse shall have been issued a certificate of occupancy and the pool and playground shall have been completed for use. [4] The length of buildings shall be varied throughout the subdivision. At time of plan review, the limitation on the length may be modified based upon an architectural design that lessens the visual impact of the increased length. 46 16SN0704-2016SEPT20-CPC-RPT C. Tract B Other Required Subdivision Standards. 1. Common Areas Ownership. Areas which are not contained in roads or in lots that are conveyed to individual owners shall be maintained by, and be the sole responsibility of, the developer and/or owner of the townhouse development, unless and until the developer and/or owner conveys such areas to a nonprofit corporate owner, whose members shall be all of the individual owners of townhouses in the development, or to a nonprofit council of co-owners as provided under the Code of Virginia. The land shall be conveyed to, and be held by, the nonprofit corporate owner or the nonprofit council of co-owners and used solely for the recreational and parking purposes of the individual townhouse lot owners. If the developer and/or owner makes the conveyance to a nonprofit corporate owner, deed restrictions and covenants, in a form and substance satisfactory to the county attorney, shall provide, among other things, that any assessments, charges and costs of the maintenance of such areas shall constitute a pro rata lien against the individual townhouse lots, inferior in dignity only to taxes and bona fide duly recorded deeds of trust on each townhouse lot. An applicant seeking to subject property to townhouse development under this section whose ownership or interest in the property is held by a valid lease, shall provide for an initial term of not less than 99 years in such lease. 2. Roads and Private Pavement. Except for alleys, roads and private pavement shall have concrete curb and gutter. All roads that accommodate general traffic circulation through a subdivision, as determined by the director of transportation, shall be designed and constructed to VDOT standards and taken into the state system. 3. Alley Screening. The view of uses within alleys shall be minimized from roads with either a wall, maintenance -free fence, or building design. Walls and fencing shall be compatible the townhomes. 4. Buffer. Required buffers shall be located in common area and comply with requirements of the Zoning Ordinance for buffers. Buffers shall be provided along Genito Place in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance for collector roads. Prior to the first plan approval in Tract B, a commitment shall be made as to the development type for Tract C. If Tract C is designated or used for industrial, a 100 foot buffer shall be provided in Tract B adjacent to Tract C. If townhouse development abuts Light Industrial (I-1) zoning, a 100 foot buffer shall be provided within the townhouse tract adjacent to the I-1 zoning. 47 16SNO704-2016SEPT20-CPC-RPT D. Tract B Lot and Building Standards. A. Lot Standards 1. Lot area (square feet) a. Internal lot 1400 b. End lot 1600 2. Lot width (feet) a. Internal lot 19 b. End lot 22 3. Lot coverage (maximum %) 65 B. Road Frontage for Townhouse Units C. Principal Building Setbacks (feet) 1. Major arterial all yards 50 2. Front yard 131 25 3. Side yard -End unit 5 4. Corner side yard 25 5. Rear yard a. Non through lot 20 b. Through lot 25 D. Dwelling Unit Size 1300 square feet of gross floor area E. Dwelling Unit Width 19 feet F. Principal Building Leight (maximum) [5][6] Lesser of 4 stories or 54 feet G. Accessory Building Requirements Subject to Section 19.1-304 Notes for Tract B -Lot and Building Standards. [1] All lots shall have frontage on a road. If approved by the director of transportation, lots may front on private pavement which has direct access to a public road when the private pavement is designed and constructed in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 17 for alleys and private pavement. [2] Setbacks may be impacted by Buffer, Setbacks --Generally, Permitted Yard Encroachments for Principal Buildings, Floodplain, Chesapeake Bay or Upper Swift Creek Watershed regulations. [3] Minimum setbacks shall be increased where necessary to obtain the required lot width at the front building line. [4] The 4th floor of a unit shall have a patio with an area of at least 33% of the unit footprint. [5] Height limits are subject to Article IV, Division 2. 48 16SNO704-2016SEPT20-CPC-RPT E. Tract B -Other Required Lot and Building Standards. 1. Architecture. In addition to the requirements of III. F. of the Textual Statement, the following requirements shall be met: a. At the time of construction plan submission, elevations depicting the proposed theme shall be submitted for approval; b. Adjacent townhome units shall not have the same facade; c. The front and rear main facades of each townhouse unit shall be varied at least 2 feet from the front and rear main facades of the adjacent unit; d. Each townhome unit shall either have a covered porch with a minimum depth of 5 feet extending for the length of the front facade, excluding the garage; or the front door shall be recessed a minimum of 18 inches from the front facade and a decorative hardscape patio with a minimum area of 100 square feet with adjacent landscaping and/or fencing shall be provided; and e. Accessory buildings shall be sided to match the townhouse units served. 2. Garages. In addition to the requirements of Textual Statement III. H., front loaded garages shall be limited a single bay. VL Tract C. A. Tract C Uses. Tract C shall be developed in its entirety for either townhouse or light industrial uses, as described herein. If developed for townhouses, uses shall be limited to those permitted by right or with restrictions in Tract B. If developed for industrial, uses shall be limited to those permitted by right or with restrictions in the Light Industrial (I-1) District. B. Tract C Required Conditions for Residential Townhouse Uses. 1.Architecture. Such uses shall comply with the requirements for Tract B, but have a different architectural theme. 2.Notice of Service District Assessment. Subdivision plats shall include the following notation: As of the recordation of this plat, this property is located in the Powhite Parkway - Charter Colony Parkway Interchange Service District, which was created pursuant to the Code of Virginia and the Chesterfield County Charter. In addition, to the real estate tax imposed on all county real estate, property located in the Service District which includes this property is subject to a supplemental real estate tax of $0.15 per $100.00 of assessed value. For additional information refer to Chesterfield County 49 16SNO704-2016SEPT20-CPC-RPT Code Sections 9-40 through 9-47 and ordinance recorded in the county circuit court clerk's office in Deed Book 6964, Page 711. C. Tract C Required Conditions for Industrial Uses. Industrial uses shall be subject to the required conditions for Light Industrial (I-1) Districts in an Emerging Growth Design District and the conditions of Zoning Case 86SNO117. VII. Tracts D and E. A. Tract E Uses. Uses shall be limited to those permitted by right or with restrictions in the C-4 Districts except that commercial outdoor recreational uses shall not be permitted. In addition, the following uses shall be permitted subject to the restrictions stated herein: 1. Residential uses located above nonresidential uses. 2. Brewery subject to the following restrictions: a. Use is in conjunction with a permitted use; and b. Brewery goods may be produced for sale on the same site provided no more than 25 persons are engaged in the production. Such persons shall be in addition to those engaged in on-site retail activities. 3. 1 computer controlled variable message electronic sign subject to zoning ordinance requirements for changeable copy signs and the following restrictions: a. Copy shall be limited to a maximum of three (3) lines and shall not move, but may fade; b. The message or display shall be programmed to change no more than once every thirty (30) seconds; c. Sequential messaging shall be prohibited; d. Flashing and traveling messages shall be prohibited; e. Bijou lighting and animation effects shall be prohibited; f. The electronic message center shall be incorporated into an architecturally designed sign structure that is compatible with, and complimentary to, the use it serves; 50 16SNO704-2016SEPT20-CPC-RPT g. Brightness shall be limited in accordance with the Electronic Message Center Policy. The sign shall have a photocell that automatically adjusts the brightness according to ambient light conditions; and h. The sign shall not be visible from Route 288 and shall be located a minimum of 1000 feet from the computer controlled variable message electronic sign in Tract D. B. Tract D Uses. In addition to the uses permitted by right or with restrictions in the C-4 Districts, the following uses shall be permitted subject to the restrictions stated herein: 1.Brewery subject to the restrictions outlined in Tract E; 2. Public address system as accessory to a permitted use; 3. 1 computer controlled variable message electronic sign visible to Genito Place subject to such sign conforming to Ordinance requirements and the following restrictions: a. Copy shall be limited to a maximum of three (3) lines and shall not move, but may fade; b. The message or display shall be programmed to change no more than once every thirty (30) seconds; c. Sequential messaging shall be prohibited; d. Flashing and traveling messages shall be prohibited; e. Bijou lighting and animation effects shall be prohibited; f. The electronic message center shall be incorporated into an architecturally designed sign structure that is compatible with, and complimentary to, the use it serves; g. Brightness shall be limited in accordance with the Electronic Message Center Policy. The sign shall have a photocell that automatically adjusts the brightness according to ambient light conditions; and h. The sign shall not be visible from Route 288 and shall be located a minimum of 1000 feet from the computer controlled variable message electronic sign in Tract E. 4. 3 portable message signs located within the interior of the project, not visible beyond the boundaries of Tract D, advertising activities within the waterpark. 5. Boat Sales, service, repair and rental as accessory to a permitted recreational use subject to the following restrictions: 51 16SNO704-2016SEPT20-CPC-RPT a. A maximum of 10 boats shall be stored; b. Boats shall not exceed a length of 32 feet; c. With the exception of outside storage and display, all other associated activities shall be conducted entirely within an enclosed building; and d. Outside storage and display areas shall be screened from view in accordance with Section 19.1-261 of the Zoning Ordinance. C. Tracts D and E Building and Parking Standards. In addition to the requirements of the Zoning Ordinance for C-4 Districts in Emerging Growth Design Districts, the conditions in specified in this section shall be met in Tracts D and E. 52 16SNO704-2016SEPT20-CPC-RPT M11MINEMIUMMEM A. Building Setbacks (feet)l'l /Required Perimeter Landscaping Notes for Tracts D and E Building and Parking Required Standards. [1] Setbacks may be impacted by Setbacks -Generally, Permitted Yard Encroachments for Principal Buildings, Floodplain and Chesapeake Bay regulations. [2] At least one principal building in a project shall be set back as follows: • 75% or more of the facade shall have a maximum setback of 15 feet; or • if a hardscaped pedestrian area extending from that portion of the building set back greater than 15 feet to the required 8 foot setback line is provided, less than 75% of the facade, but in no case less than 50% of the facade, shall have a maximum setback of 15 feet. [3] Canopies and awnings that create pedestrian arcades shall be permitted to encroach into the required setback and shall not be subject to the limits of Section 19.1-209. [4] Parking shall be set back as follows: • no closer to the road than the rear of the building; or • if there is no building, the greater of either V2 the depth of the lot or no closer to the road than the rear facade setback of the nearest building facing the road. Views of parking from roads shall either be minimized by a building, or 3 to 4 foot high decorative walls, fencing, evergreen hedges or a combination thereof. Hedges shall be maintained at a height of 3 to 4 feet. Walls, fencing and hedges shall be located as follows: • set back from the road at the minimum building setback; or • between the parking and any hardscaped pedestrian area located between the road and the parking area. 53 16SN0704-2016SEPT20-CPC-RPT a. Limited access 40/C b. Genito Road 50/C 1. Road type c. Genito Place 30/A d. Other roads 8[2][31 2. Yard adjacent to I-1 zoning 10/B 3. Interior side and rear yard 0 B. Parking Setbacks(feet)"'/Required Perimeter Landscaping a. Limited access 40/C 1. Road type b. Genito Road 50/C c. Other roads 15 [41 2. Yard adjacent to I-1 zoning 10/B 3. Interior side and rear yard 0 C. Building Heights [sl 1. Hotel, office or building with mixed use of nonresidential and residential Lesser of 6 stories or 85 feet 2. Other Lesser of 4 stories or 52 feet Notes for Tracts D and E Building and Parking Required Standards. [1] Setbacks may be impacted by Setbacks -Generally, Permitted Yard Encroachments for Principal Buildings, Floodplain and Chesapeake Bay regulations. [2] At least one principal building in a project shall be set back as follows: • 75% or more of the facade shall have a maximum setback of 15 feet; or • if a hardscaped pedestrian area extending from that portion of the building set back greater than 15 feet to the required 8 foot setback line is provided, less than 75% of the facade, but in no case less than 50% of the facade, shall have a maximum setback of 15 feet. [3] Canopies and awnings that create pedestrian arcades shall be permitted to encroach into the required setback and shall not be subject to the limits of Section 19.1-209. [4] Parking shall be set back as follows: • no closer to the road than the rear of the building; or • if there is no building, the greater of either V2 the depth of the lot or no closer to the road than the rear facade setback of the nearest building facing the road. Views of parking from roads shall either be minimized by a building, or 3 to 4 foot high decorative walls, fencing, evergreen hedges or a combination thereof. Hedges shall be maintained at a height of 3 to 4 feet. Walls, fencing and hedges shall be located as follows: • set back from the road at the minimum building setback; or • between the parking and any hardscaped pedestrian area located between the road and the parking area. 53 16SN0704-2016SEPT20-CPC-RPT D. Tracts D and E Gasoline Pumps and Associated Drives. Gasoline pumps shall meet the setback requirements for buildings outlined in the Table for Tracts D and E except that along "other roads" the setback shall be increased to 30 feet with Landscaping A. Drives associated with gasoline pumps shall meet the setback requirements for parking outlined in Table A. E. Tracts D and E Parking. At the time of plan review, the director of planning may grant exceptions to parking space requirements based upon the uniqueness and mixture of uses. Consideration shall be given to available off-site spaces, their availability through long term lease agreements, and ease of accessibility to the development. F. Tracts D and E - Other Required Conditions 1. Recreational Use Setbacks and Tree Preservation/Landscaping along Route 288. In addition to required setbacks for buildings and parking from Route 288, all other uses shall be set back 40 feet from Route 288, unless otherwise approved by the planning department. Trees shall be retained with the setback in accordance with the zoning ordinance and where necessary supplemented with Landscaping C. 2. Noise. Noise shall not exceed 55 dBA at the nearest property line in the subdivisions of St. George, Abbot's Mill, Plum Creek at Southridge, Beaver Point, Cradle Hill, Huntsbridge, Quail Hill, Carriage Creek and the neighborhoods of Watch Hill, Bayport Landing, East Bluff, Harbour Bluff, Harbour Hill, Harbour Ridge, Harbourwood, Lands End, North Pointe, Promontory Pointe, Rockport Landing, Spinnaker Cove, Millcrest, Muirfield Green, Autumn Woods, Birnam Woods, Chimney House, Cove Ridge, Deer Meadow, Long Hill, Oak Springs, Shadow Ridge, Turtle Hill, Walnut Creek, Spring Gate, Huntgate Woods, Whispering Oaks, Ridge Creek, McTyre's Cove, Regatta Pointe, Riverbirch Trace, Shallowford Landing, Shallowford Trace, The Oaks, Fortunes Ridge, Nuttree Woods, Pebble Creek, Sagewood, Sterlings Bridge, Stoney Ridge, Timber Ridge, Seven Oaks, Walkers Ferry, Commodore Point, Barnes Spring, Court Ridge, Five Springs, Heritage Woods, Litchfield Bluff, Long Shadow, Old Fox Trail, Planters Wood, Poplar Grove, Thornridge, Winterberry Ridge, Northwich, G1enEagles, Fox Chase, Huntsbridge, Quail Hill, Three Bridges, Steeple Chase, Sandy Brook, Shady Pointe, Two Notch, Copper Hill, Watkins Glen, Tanglebrook, Sutters Mill, Crosstimbers, Cradle Hill, Carriage Creek, Arrowood, Garrison Place, Woodbridge Crossing Greens, and Woodbridge Crossing, collectively and commonly referred to as Brandermill. 54 16SNO704-2016SEPT20-CPC-RPT 44A j 55 x NVId 3NNOZ38 d77 Y 7N '13PVVVOa VINMA 'AINOOO 7731AL53HO 53s1ONINOZ AdVd UJIVM OH038.].LVAA 0/0 Ndd'IHVN ewd xv vo 1Y8fkI XY�Fe fl oor mas INb uva z F],m 44A j 55 16SNO704-2016SEPT20-CPC-RPT x z 16SNO704-2016SEPT20-CPC-RPT i� TIA -ATTACHMENT 3 RICHMOND DISTRICT 2430 Pine Forest Drive Charles Kilpatrick, P.E. COLONIALH HEIGHTS, COMMISSIONER www.VDOT.Virginia.gov July 12, 2015 Jane Peterson Chesterfield County Dept. of Planning 9800 Government Center Parkway PO Box 40 Chesterfield, VA 23832-0040 (Sent Via E-mail) SUBJECT: Waterford Park Rezoning Traffic Impact Analysis Acceptance (Case 16SN0704) NW Quadrant — Route 288 / Genito Rd. (Route 604) 2"d Submission, Study Revision dated May 2016 Dear Ms. Peterson: In accordance with §15.2-2222.1 of the Code of Virginia and the Virginia Traffic Impact Analysis Regulations, 24 VAC 30-155 (also known as Chapter 527), a traffic impact analysis was prepared by RK&K on the rezoning for the proposed development project entitled Waterford Park. The Virginia Department of Transportation (Department) has evaluated the second submission of the subject traffic impact analysis, (hardcopy received on June 7, 2016) and finds that the report conforms to the requirements of Chapter 527 in regard to the accuracy of the methodologies, assumptions and conclusions presented in the analysis. Summarized below are key findings and recommendations as identified in the study as well as comments related to compliance with Access Management Regulation standards. Description Proposed is a 105 acre mixed use commercial development located on a parcel bounded by Route 288 to the east, Genito Road (Rt 604) to the south, Tredegar Lake Parkway to the north and the Village at Waterford Development to the west. At full build out, the proposed development will consist of 330 apartment units, 360 townhomes, 115,000 SF of retail, 50,000 SF of restaurants, 330,000 SF of commercial (business park) and a 40 -acre outdoor adventure park. • Interim site development is anticipated to be constructed and in use by 2020 with build -out anticipated by 2023. The study identified land use phasing is as follows: Ms. Peterson July 12, 2016 Page 2 of 6 Interim (2020) Commercial Office — 75,000 SF Retail — 70,000 SF Restaurant— 20,000 SF Outdoor Adventure Park Build -Out (2023) Apartments -330 units Townhomes-360 units Commercial Office — 255,000 SF Retail — 45,000 SF Restaurants —30,000 SF • For the purpose of this study, the interim phase and build trip generation is as follows (does not include deduction for internal capture and pass -by trips): Interim (2020) Build -Out (2023) Study Area Intersections • Existing Intersections: Weekday Traffic —16,000 VPD AM Peak Hour— 787 Total Trips PM Peak Hour —1,043 Total Trips Weekend Peak -1,882 Trips Weekday Traffic — 24,299 VPD Powhite Parkway/ Charter Colony Parkway/ Old Hundred Rd. (signalized) Charter Colony Parkway / Tredegar Lake Parkway / Colony Crossing Places (signalized) Charter Colony Parkway / Genito Road (signalized) Genito Road / Genito Place / Kelly Green Drive (unsignalized) Genito Road / River City Sportsplex Entrance (unsignalized) Genito Road / Warbro Road / Oak Lake Boulevard (signalized) • Proposed Access/Intersection: Genito Road / Proposed Right-In/Right-Out Access Study Operational Analysis (LOS/Queue) In accordance with the Ch. 527 guidelines evaluated were 2015 existing conditions, 2023 background and build -out conditions (with recommended improvements) and 2029 background and build -out conditions (with recommended improvements). The study also includes an interim analysis assuming a portion of the site will be built by 2020. Additionally provided are 2035 Horizon conditions to satisfy Chesterfield Department of Transportation requirements. The Departments review/comments of the operational analysis do not include the 2035 Horizon conditions. Ms. Peterson July 12, 2016 Page 3 of 6 No -Build Background, 2015 • LOS - All study area intersections operate at an overall LOS of C, D or E during peak hours with the northbound approach at the unsignalized intersection of Genito Road / Genito Place / Kelly Green Parkway operating at LOS F. • Queue - The study analysis indicated queues extending beyond the length of the storage lanes under existing conditions with significant back-ups at the eastbound approach of Charter Colony Parkway/ Powhite Parkway/ Old Hundred Road during the AM peak, the northbound approach of the same intersection during the PM peak, the southbound approach of the Charter Colony at Tredegar Lake Parkway and the southbound approach of Charter Colony Parkway at Genito Road during the PM peak. Interim. 2020 (interim phase development with proposed phased improvements) This analysis was conducted to verify signal warrants at the Genito Road / Genito Place / Kelly Green Drive intersection. Study findings support that the warrants would be met, assuming interim build volumes as proposed and 25% build out of the remaining Village at Waterford Park development. • LOS - The studied intersections of existing Charter Colony / Tredegar Lake Parkway, Charter Colony / Genito Road and Genito Road / Genito Place / Kelly Green Drive and the proposed Genito Road right-in/right-out access operate at an LOS D or greater. No other intersections were analyzed under this scenario. • Queue—The study did not include a queuing analysis for the interim conditions. No -Build, 2023 (future conditions without development or improvements) • LOS - The overall intersection level of service at the Charter Colony Parkway / Tredegar Lake Drive and Charter Colony / Genito Road intersections degrade from an LOS D under 2015 conditions to an LOS E in 2023. All other intersection LOS remains the same as under the No -Build Background conditions. • Queue -The study analysis indicated queues extending beyond the length of the storage lanes with significant back-ups under the 2023 No -Build conditions at the same locations cited under the 2015 No -Build Background conditions. Build, 2023 (future conditions with build -out and proposed improvements) • LOS - The intersection of Charter Colony Parkway / Powhite Parkway degrade to an LOS E during the AM peak and LOS F during the PM peak from the 2023 no -build scenario. All other intersections operate at an LOS D or better. • Queue — Queues continue to extend beyond the length of the storage lanes at several locations with significant back-ups anticipated at the eastbound approach of Charter Colony Parkway / Powhite Parkway / Old Hundred Road during the AM peak and the northbound, westbound and southbound approaches of the same intersection during the PM peak. However, compared to 2023 No -Build conditions, the proposed improvements would Ms. Peterson July 12, 2016 Page 4 of 6 reduce queues along the southbound Charter Colony Parkway approach at Tredegar Lake Parkway and Genito Road during the PM peak hour and along the northbound Kelly Green Drive approach to Genito Road during the AM peak hour. . No -Build 2029 future conditions without development or improvements) • LOS - The intersections of Charter Colony Parkway with Powhite Parkway, Tredegar Lake Parkway and Genito Road all operate at a LOS of D or worse during AM and PM peak hours. All other intersections operate at an LOS D or better. • Queue —The study analysis indicated queues extending beyond the length of the storage lanes with significant back-ups under the 2029 No -Build conditions at the same locations cited under the 2023 No -Build conditions. Build, 2029 (future conditions_ with build -out and 2023 improvements) • LOS - The intersection of Charter Colony Parkway / Powhite Parkway continues to operate at an LOS E during the AM peak and LOS F during the PM peak, as during the 2023 Build conditions. All other intersections continue to operate at an LOS D or better. Queue —Queues continue to extend beyond the length of the storage lanes at several locations with significant back-ups anticipated at the eastbound approach of Charter Colony Parkway / Powhite Parkway / Old Hundred Road during the AM peak and the northbound, westbound and southbound approaches of the same intersection during the PM peak. However, compared to 2029 No -Build conditions, the proposed improvements would reduce queues along the southbound Charter Colony Parkway approach at Tredegar Lake Parkway and Genito Road during the PM peak hour and along the northbound Kelly Green Drive approach to Genito Road during the AM peak hour. Recommended Improvements The following are improvements identified in the study, necessary to mitigate adverse impacts of the proposed development. Interim Phase • Genito Road/ Genito Place/ Kelly Green Drive ■ Widening of Genito Place at Genito Road to provide three approach lanes at the intersection (left only, shared through -left, right only) ■ Construction of traffic signal • Tredegar Cake Parkway Extension Extend the roadway from its current terminus at Waterford Lake Drive to Genito Place. Ms. Peterson July 12, 2016 Page5of6 • Genito Road/New Right-In/Right-Out Driveway ■ Construct new access approximately 425' west of Genito Road / Genito Place / Kelly Green Drive. Provide a right turn lane (100' taper/100' storage) Build -Out Phase In addition to the interim improvements, the following is proposed to be completed, prior to build -out (2023). • Genito Road/ Genito Place/ Kelly Green Drive ■ Construction of a second eastbound Genito Road left turn lane (250' storage) • Genito Road/Charter Colony Parkway ■ Construction of a second westbound right turn lane along Genito Rd. (350' storage) • Charter Colony Parkway at Tredegar Lake Parkway ■ Construction of a second southbound left turn lane along Charter Colony Parkway (300' storage) ■ Modification of the eastbound approach to provide a left only, shared left / through and right only lanes. ■ Modification of the westbound approach to provide a left only, shared left / through and right only (200' storage) lanes. ■ Traffic signal modifications as necessary The feasibility of constructing the noted recommended improvements has not been considered as part of this study. Further evaluation is required to verify any constraints associated with right-of-way acquisition, utility locations and/or other design considerations that may impact the ability to construct. Access Management In addition to the Ch 527 findings noted above, the proposal was evaluated for compliance to the spacing standards found in the Access Management Regulations 24 VAC 30-72 / 24VAC30-73. Identified below are those findings. • The location of the proposed new Genito Road right -in / right -out access and of the proposed signal at the Genito Road / Genito Place / Kelly Green Parkway intersection comply with Regulation spacing standards from other intersections/access points. No further Department evaluation of an exception to the standards is necessary. The purpose of the traffic impacts analysis report and the summary of findings can include assisting the Planning Director, the Planning Commission and/or the Board of Supervisors in their decision-making process regarding the proposed development. I am available at your convenience to meet with County staff and/or Board/Commission members to discuss the findings and answer any questions. I'm also Ms. Peterson July 12, 2016 Page 6 of 6 available upon request to present these recommendations at any public meeting on the above referenced project. Finally, I ask that you arrange to have VDOrs summary of the key findings of the traffic analysis included in the official public records (meeting minutes, staff report) on the proposed project and to have this letter and the traffic impact analysis placed in the case file for the site plan application. The Department will also make these documents available to the general public. Should you have questions, I can be reached at 804-674-2384. Sincerely, Brian Lokker, PE Area Land Use Engineer, Central CC (Via E-mail): S. Simonson (CDOT) J. Kuttesch (RK&K) J. Banks (CDOT) R. Svejkovsky (VDOT) Summary EPA has released its 2012 recreational water quality criteria (RWQC) recommendations for protecting human health in all coastal and non - coastal waters designated for primary contact recreation use. EPA provides two sets of recommended criteria. Primary contact recreation is protected if either set of criteria recommendations are adopted into state water quality standards. These recommendations are intended as guidance to states, territories and authorized tribes in developing water quality standards to protect swimmers from exposure to water that contains organisms that indicate the presence of fecal contamination. EPA last issued ambient water quality criteria recommendations for recreational waters in 1986. EPA issues such recommendations under the authority of the Clean Water Act (CWA). Amendments to the CWA by the Beaches Environmental Assessment and Coastal Health (BEACH) Act of 2000 direct EPA to conduct studies associated with pathogens and human health, and to publish new or revised criteria recommendations for pathogens and pathogen indicators based on those studies. These 2012 RWQC meet those requirements. The 2012 RWQC rely on the latest research and science, including studies that show a link between illness and fecal contamination in recreational waters. They are based on the use of two bacterial indicators of fecal contamination, E. coli and enterococci. The new criteria are designed to protect primary contact recreation, including swimming, bathing, surfing, water skiing, tubing, water play by children, and similar water contact activities where a high degree of bodily contact with the water, immersion and ingestion are likely. The 2012 RWQC offer two sets of numeric concentration thresholds, either of which would protect the designated use of primary contact recreation and, therefore, would protect the public from exposure to harmful levels of pathogens. Illness rates upon which these recommendations are based use the National Epidemiological and Environmental Assessment of Recreational Water (NEEAR) definition of gastrointestinal illness, which is not limited to illnesses which exhibit a fever. The RWQC consist of three components: magnitude, duration and frequency. The magnitude of the bacterial indicators are described by both a geometric mean (GM) and a statistical threshold value (STV) for the bacteria samples. The STV approximates the 90th percentile of the water quality distribution and is intended to be a value that should not be exceeded by more than 10 percent of the samples taken. The table summarizes the magnitude component of the recommendations. All three components are explained in more detail in the sections below. CRITERIA Recommendation 4 Recommendation 2 ELEMENTS Estimated Illness Rate 3011,000 Estimated 11hess Rate 3219,060 Indicator GM STV (M STV (Cru11160 mL} (du1100 inL) efu1100 aIL afur100 mL Enterococci 35 130 30 110 (Marine a frust) E` Mfi 1126 410 100 320 tress Water quality criteria recommendations are intended as guidance in establishing new or revised water quality standards. They are not regulations themselves. States and authorized tribes have the discretion to adopt, where appropriate, other scientifically defensible water quality criteria that differ from EPA's recommended criteria. Enterococci: Culturable enterococci at a geometric mean (GM) of 35 colony forming units (CFU per 100 milliliters (mL) and a statistical threshold value (STV) of 130 cfu per 100 mL, measured using EPA Method 1600, or any other equivalent method that measures culturable enterococci. E. coli: Culturable E. coli at a GM of 126 cfa per 100 mL and an STV of 410 cfu per 100 mL measured using EPA Method 1603, or any other equivalent method that measures culturable E. coli. RECOMMEND,RECOMMENDA I..ION 21, II AGNI.I.. DE Enterococci: Culturable enterococci at a GM of 30 cfu per 100 mL and an STV of 110 cfu per 100 mL, measured using EPA Method 1600, or any other equivalent method that measures culturable enterococci. E. coli: Culturable E. coli at a GM of 100 cfu per 100 mL and an STV of 320 cfu per 100 mL measured using EPA Method 1603, or any other equivalent method that measures culturable E. coli. FOR BO I..H RE .CI II II NDA I..ION Duration and Frequency: The waterbody GM should not be greater than the selected GM magnitude in any 30 -day interval. There should not be greater than a ten percent excursion frequency of the selected STV magnitude in the same 30 -day interval. Similar Protection for Fresh and Marine Waters: The EPA used an analysis of NEEAR water quality data to refine the illness rate estimate for the recommended marine criterion for entercocci. The 2012 RWQC values now protect public health similarly in both marine and fresh waters. A New Measurement Value: EPA is introducing a new term, Statistical Threshold Value (STV), to be used in conjunction with the recommended GM value. New Early Alert Tool: In addition to recommending criteria values, EPA is now also providing states with Beach Action Values (BAVs) for use in notification programs. The BAV is provided for states to use as a precautionary tool to provide an early alert to beachgoers, including families with children. A Single Level of Beach Use: The 1986 bacteria criteria document included four single sample maximum (SSM) values appropriate for different levels of beach usage (use intensities). In the 2012 RWQC, EPA removed those recommendations and instead provided states with optional, precautionary BAVs for use in monitoring and notification programs. More Tools for Assessing and Managing Recreational Waters: EPA is providing information on tools for evaluating and managing recreational waters, such as predictive modeling and sanitary surveys. The Agency is also providing tools for developing site-specific criteria such as epidemiological studies, quantitative microbial risk assessment, and use of alternative indicators or methods. The EPA has developed and validated a molecular testing method using quantitative polymerase chain reaction (gPCR) as a rapid analytical technique for the detection of enterococci in recreational water (EPA Method 1611). For the purposes of beach monitoring, a state may use a gPCR method on a site-specific basis. « • • EPA has put the 2012 RWQC document, support documents, and the Federal Register Notice, in the docket (Docket identification No. EPA -HQ -OW -2011-0466) which can be accessed via EPA's website at htlp://water.epa.gov/scitech/swguidance/standar ds/criteria/health/recreation/index.cfm. You can also contact Sharon Nappier at nappiensharon&epa.gov or (202)566-0740, or contact Tracy Bone at bone tracy(a�epaov or (202) 564-5257 for more information.