The URL can be used to link to this page

2016-09-28 PacketCHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Meeting Date: September 28, 2016 Item Number: 2.A. County Administration Update County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Mr. ion Lugbill, Executive Director with Sportsbackers will update the Board on Sports Tourism in Chesterfield County and the surrounding region. Preparer: Sarah C. Snead — Attachments: Title: Deputy County Administrator 0(;0002 wm 10r 01 0 G a 60) G " -, ') U" ' d� w G G, 0 C , U"o �; n �, ��„ �� c", It kJ 111 100 , LO a"S�'gifEd.,p Cry,. r� Y gay ��Rfi°d1A IM M Meeting Date: September 28, 2016_ Item Number: 2.B. County Administration Update am Fire Chief Edward L. Senter Jr., will provide a brief update on the improvement of Chesterfield's Public Protection Classification (PPC) rating resulting from a recent re-evaluation by the Insurance Services Office (ISO) of the county's fire protection system. Attachments: Yes No Title: Fire Chief If,r What is • The Insurance Services Office(ISO) is the property and casualty insurance risk u rates for residential and commercial poli The Public Protection Classification (PP of a community's fire protection sy Suppression Rating Schedule (FSRS) and to 10: Emergency Communications System (1, Municipal Water Supply System (40%) Fire Department (50%) Community Risk' Reduction Efforts (up syc M�� 01 r"Ll 0 0 13 A Chesterfield Fire and EMS ISO Classification - Decomber 1, 2016 Legend Existing Fite stawns tlj�lltgl 120 Class 2 ISO Class 2Y ISO class'lo)m �� ESO Class 10 UID AM companies th New 111"R, R • Goal; Achlf other count LV:VV.. /E/ addit1( etc.). • Contin E ✓" CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Meeting Date: September 28, 2016 Item Number: 5.A. Resolution Recognizing Lieutenant David J. Higgins, Police Department, Upon His Retirement Adoption of the attached resolution. Lieutenant David J. Higgins will retire from the Police Department on October 1, 2016, after providing 29 years of service to the residents of Chesterfield County. Preparer: —C-o-l-onel ThierrV G. Dupuis Attachments: 0 Yes FIN* Title: Chief of Police RECOGNIZING LIEUTENANT DAVID J. HIGGINS UPON HIS RETIREMENT WHEREAS, Lieutenant David J. Higgins will retire from the Chesterfield County Police Department on October 1, 2016, after providing 29 years of outstanding quality service to the residents of Chesterfield County; and WHEREAS, Lieutenant Higgins has faithfully served the county in the capacity of Patrol Officer, Forensic Detective, Detective First Class, Senior Detective, Master Detective, Career Detective, Sergeant and Lieutenant; and WHEREAS, during his tenure, Lieutenant Higgins also served as Evidence Technician and General Instructor; and WHEREAS, Lieutenant Higgins received the Meritorious Service Award for his work on the Centennial Committee, tasked with documenting the history of the Chesterfield County Police Department and developing a plan for celebrating the 100 -year anniversary, after the committee provided new mission, vision and values statements, a new uniform patch, updated the 124 - page history book and performed a re-enactment of the 1914 Board of Supervisors' formation of the police department; and WHEREAS, Lieutenant Higgins received four Unit Citations during his tenure, two reflecting his dedication and long hours in detailed evidence collection while assigned to Forensics, one for his unit's achievement of significant crime reduction objectives while in Uniform Operations, and one for the major improvement in workflow processes and customer service to the community while serving in the Office of Professional Standards; and WHEREAS, Lieutenant Higgins received the Chief's Commendation for an exhaustive search at a crime scene, which included a three-day examination of the contents of a suspect's car, multiple days spent at the crime scene, and the collection of over 100 pieces of evidence, and his efforts resulted in a guilty murder plea from the suspect; and WHEREAS, Lieutenant Higgins earned an Achievement Award for his participation on the team responsible for the development of a formal Police Awards and Recognition Ceremony to celebrate police officer, civilian and community member honorees in a manner that appropriately distinguishes them in the eyes of their peers, families and fellow residents; and WHEREAS, Lieutenant Higgins was presented with the Achievement Award as a member of the Police Accreditation Team following the successful re- accreditation by the Virginia Law Enforcement Professional Standards Commission, recognizing the Chesterfield County Police Department as an innovative and progressive law-enforcement agency; and WHEREAS, Lieutenant Higgins was consistently recognized for his active role in teaching, coaching and mentoring his subordinates and for always setting a positive example for others to follow; and WHEREAS, Lieutenant Higgins made valuable contributions to the Police History Committee, Recognition and Discipline Committee, Forensic Technician Career Development Committee and the Police Quality Council; and WHEREAS, Lieutenant Higgins is recognized for his excellent communications and human relations skills, his professionalism and teamwork, all of which he has utilized within the Police Department and in assisting residents of Chesterfield County during his exemplary career; and WHEREAS, during his tenure, Lieutenant Higgins has received numerous letters of commendation, thanks and appreciation for services rendered; and WHEREAS, Lieutenant Higgins has provided the Chesterfield County Police Department with many years of loyal and dedicated service; and WHEREAS, Chesterfield County and the Board of Supervisors will miss Lieutenant Higgins, diligent service. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors, this 28th day of September 2016, publicly recognizes Lieutenant David J. Higgins and extends on behalf of its members and the residents of Chesterfield County, appreciation for his service to the county, congratulations upon his retirement, and best wishes for a long and happy retirement. AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that a copy of this resolution be presented to Lieutenant Higgins, and that this resolution be permanently recorded among the papers of this Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County, Virginia. 4 MAN 141' i 61,11 5*ARD OFI.51VERMURS AGENDA Meeting Date: September 28, 2016 Item ilumber: 6.A. Work Session - Social Services Board Presentation a 4r, On behalf of the Chesterfield -Colonial Heights Board of Social Services, the Director of the Chesterfield -Colonial Heights Department of Social Services will present information describing the current Social Services environment, revenue and expenditure totals, accomplishments and challenges facing the agency moving forward. Preparer: Kiva Rociefs Attachments:■ Title: Director, Chesterfield -Colonial Heights Department of Social Services ----------- Our Mi*ssi*on In collaboration with individuals, families and the community, our mission is to provide advocacy and excellent services that encourage self-sufficiency; preserve and restore families; and protect the well-being of children, senior citizens and people with disabilities. . ..... . 1h, anArurzimunity CHESTERFIELD — COLONIAil HEIGHTs DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES In collaboraflon wifth iindiMiduals, fami'llies and the commtniity... Community Engagement Asset based community development CPS mandated reporter training 0 Community education project CHESTERFIELD — COLONTAi, HEIGHTS DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES ff/ R iq ide advocacy and excellent se ices thmi ... provIl MI. encourage self-sufficiency First Choice Community Employment Center 0 465 total participants 0 23 events since Ally 2015 0 Established new partnerships CHESTERFIELD -- COLONIAL HEIGHTS SERVICES .... . ....... . .......... ..... -------------- Commitment to the highest standard of service K WIRM aw r„liquilliplil 1111 1 86% reduction in overdue Medical Assistance reviews Reduced length of thileto process applications from 42 days to 27 days Maintained an average of 98.6% timely completion of SNAP applications for FY 16, exceeding 97% standard CHESTERFIELD — COLONJAL HEIGin's DEPART ENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES .... Protect the well-being of cluldren, senior citizens and people with disabilities In ITY 16_ Children Entering Foster Care 6o * 74 % of youth entered foster care for 56 57 reasons of abuse and/or neglect. 55z 50 * 26 % entered -foster care for non -abuse 45 4$�,��- and neglect reasons (i.e. Delinquency, 40 ............. Relief of Custody, CHINS — Child. In Need of Services) 35 --- ------- 30 29 * 37% of the children who entered. foster 23 care were over the age Of 12 20 IY2012 1+Y2m$FY2014 FY2015 FY2o16 iY CHESTERFIELD — COLONIAL HEIGHTS DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES 0 .... Protect the well-being of 01flAxen, senior citizens and people N"ith disabilities Monthly Average of Youtb in In FY 16... Foster Care 90 _i - 87 % of youth discharged from foster care achieved permanency 35 % were adopted by adoptive families or relatives So 70 6o 50 40 30 FY2012 FY2013 FY2014 FY2015 IY2016 5elieving in (he CHESTERFIELD — COLONIAL HEIGin'sDE'PARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES .... ..... .. .. . ....... .... Protect the well-being of children, senior citizens and. people wl''th d1sal3ifities In FY 16_ Conducted over 250 screenings for Medical Assistance waiver services in collaboration with the Chesterfield. Health Department Recognized as one of the most timely agencies in the state 10/1ll Pellevlrg in [lie CHESTERFIELD - COLONIAL HEIGHTS DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES 0 WADEM M*Icrosoft ii -CRM DynaMICSP CHESTERFIELD -- COLONIAL HEIGHTS DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES mwz Recruitment and Retention m Technology Enhancements CHESTERFIELD - COLONIAL HEIGHTS DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES 0 - Workforce - Customer Service 0 Business Processes Community Engagement CHESTERFIELD -- COLONIAL HEIGHTS DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES Cl� CHESTERFIELD T { L t FBOARD OF SUPERVISORSage 1 of cAGENDA Meeting Date: September 281, 2016 Item Number: 6.B. Cash Proffer Policy Reform The Board is requested to adopt the reformed policy for FY2017. A •, ' 0 The Board of Supervisors has evaluated zoning cases under the guidance of a cash proffer policy since 1989. The policy has been periodically modified since that time. After completing an in depth review based on the Board's request to evaluate the policy and changes in the state code, staff is proposing to reform the existing cash proffer policy. The attached presentation summarizes the recommendations. The proposed policy revision, broadly stated, is designed to encourage appropriate and long lasting residential communities that should enhance property values. The proposal recommends establishing a lower maximum cash proffer dedicated exclusively for transportation projects, thereby preserving alternative capital facility revenue. Establishing a lower maximum; while preserving a revenue source, could constrain long range growth in cash proffer revenues given the sizeable reduction in the maximum cash proffer, but at its current $18,966 maximum, other constraints are arising in having quality projects proceed and targeted revitalization area projects from being submitted. Attachments: Yes N® # BOARD OS j R : P.age 2 fi AGENDA With the cash proffer transition to a $9,400 maximum road proffer that can be used to leverage state revenue sharing and other state/ federal funding models, it is anticipated that such revenue impact may be mitigated. In addition, revitalization and preservation area development in combination with commercial impacts should also provide positive net revenue impacts. Cash proffer revenues provide some diversity among revenues in the Capital Improvement Program (CIP), and likewise alleviate upward pressure on the real estate tax rate. Absent such revenues, the currently adopted CIP would require amendments or alternative revenues in order to deliver the projects in the same timeframe at a time when even greater demands from new housing are placed upon capital facilities. The combined long term effects of constrained cash proffer growth and enhanced property values will be monitored over time to establish a clearer picture of capital funding levels. The revenues would be reported in conjunction with the capital improvement process. A second key element of the proposal is a recommendation to eliminate cash proffers for revitalization -preservation projects, an objective in line with the broadly stated policy goal. Doing so aligns with concepts adopted with the Ettrick Special Area Plan that recognizes reductions in cash proffers as one method to assist in reestablishing older communities. In addition to the cash proffer policy, the Planning Commission is currently discussing residential quality standards that could result in a guidance document for reviewing zoning cases. Through both the cash proffer policy and established guidance on quality standards, staff will be better positioned to strengthen recommendations on zoning cases using clearly communicated policy guideposts. Cash proffer revenues are currently programmed in the adopted FY2017-21 CIP, largely allocated to school and transportation projects. Cash proffer revenues on hand, coupled with projected revenues from already approved cases are believed to be sufficient to fund the planned projects in the adopted CIP. Under the proposal, beyond the approved CIP, staff will monitor cash proffer revenue collections as noted above. The recommended policy revision, if adopted, would be applied to zoning cases not yet approved by the Board of Supervisors. Previously approved cases would remain subject to the conditions and policy approved with such cases. Property owners could however, decide to amend such cases through the zoning process. Staff would evaluate such requests for compliance with existing zoning ordinances, policies and the approved comprehensive plan. Staff recommends that the Board hold the work session and adopt the policy. CHESTERFIELD COUNTY, VIRGINIA ROAD CASH PROFFER POLICY This road cash proffer policy is effective as of September 28, 2016. This policy applies to all zoning applications filed on or after September 28, 2016 as well as any pending zoning case which has not received final action from the Board of Supervisors. Cases approved prior to September 28, 2016 which contain cash proffers will continue to be governed by the earlier cash proffer policy which was reaffirmed by the Board on June 24, 2015. A. General Guidelines New residential development has an impact on the health, safety and welfare of county citizens, especially with respect to use of the county's public facilities. For rezoning requests that permit residential uses, the Board will evaluate and accept proffers for transportation facilities in accordance with this policy. In its review of zoning requests, the Board will consider health, safety and welfare issues and measures taken by zoning applicants to address impacts on transportation facilities in accordance with this policy; however, an application containing proffers that satisfactorily mitigate the impact on transportation facilities may not necessarily satisfy all health, safety and welfare issues. 2. In accordance with Virginia Code § 15.2-2303.4, any cash proffer must be reasonable to be accepted by the Board. A reasonable proffer is offered to address an impact that is specifically attributable to the proposed new residential development. Moreover, the proposed residential development must create a need or a portion of a need for the transportation facility improvement(s) in excess of existing transportation facility capacity at the time of the rezoning, and the proposed development receives a direct and material benefit from a proffer made with respect to such transportation facility improvement(s). Staff determines the cost of transportation facilities generated by new growth by relying on the assumption that any revenue derived from growth (residential and commercial real estate taxes, sales taxes, fees, etc.) will pay all the normal operating costs for services to residents of new developments with no funds remaining to pay for the cost of transportation facilities needed to serve these residents. State and county laws permit the Board to accept cash proffers to fund certain public facility needs generated by any new residential development. 4. Transportation facilities may be funded by cash proffers. Cash proffers will not be accepted to fund other public facilities. 5. A development proposal's impact on transportation facilities will be evaluated based on the gross number of proposed dwelling units and transportation needs related to the proposed development. 6. The Board may consider development proposals that include substantial upgrades to current design/development standards and ordinance requirements as justification for 2723:97339.1 Pagel of4 000032 accepting road cash proffers in amounts less than the full fiscal impact calculated pursuant to the road cash proffer calculation methodology for the pre-existing lot yields. B. Methodology and Policy Terms 1. There are eight steps involved in calculating the impact of a new residential dwelling unit on the transportation network. The components are as follows: a. Demand Generators: Using the County's Land Use Plan parcel -level database for build -out, the transportation model generates and assigns trips to the County's road network, as identified in the Thoroughfare Plan, per Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) standards. b. Typical Improvement Costs: Typical road improvement costs are based on actual construction costs derived from recently completed projects in the county. c. Capacity Improvements: The model calculates the capacity improvements necessary to maintain a Level of Service E network -wide, but the Board could adopt a different Level of Service standard for a particular development, area, or region of the County or for the entire County. d. Gross Cost of Improvements: The model uses the typical road improvement costs and the capacity improvements to calculate the gross cost of the improvements to the network required to maintain a Level of Service E at build -out. e. Credit: The credit is calculated using the average annual amount of funding assigned to network improvements over the upcoming six years and applying that each year until build -out. f. Net Cost of Improvements: The net cost of improvements is calculated by subtracting the credit from the gross cost of improvements. g. Trip Cost: The net cost of improvements is divided by the total number of trips generated. h. The transportation proffer for a dwelling unit is calculated by multiplying the number of trips generated by a typical single family dwelling unit by the trip cost. 2. In order to ensure that money proffered by an applicant is used to fund the transportation facilities necessitated, in whole or in part, by the applicant's development, geographic service areas or districts are established across the County. For road cash proffers, rezoning requests are analyzed based on two geographic service districts, one north of Route 360 and one south of Route 360, to determine costs and impact. These service districts are used to calculate a road cost per dwelling unit. The Transportation Department has identified traffic sheds across the County and money collected from a development within a particular shed will be spent on road improvements within that shed or on roads that provide relief to that shed. 2723:97339.1 Page 2 of 000033 3. An applicant may choose to mitigate the development's calculated impact on public facilities by dedicating property or doing in-kind improvements in lieu of all or a portion of the road cash proffer. For property designated for dedication (excluding roads) staff will follow the County's procedure for "Acquisition of Private Property for Public Use". The value of donated land generally will be based on the current assessed value of the property, not to exceed the cost per acre used in the calculation of the proffer. The value of improvements shall be the estimated cost as determined by the County and calculated as if constructed by a governmental entity. If the dedication or in-kind improvement does not fully mitigate the development's calculated impact on transportation facilities, then the dedication and/or improvement's value may be applied as an offset against, but not more than, the development's calculated impact on the applicable transportation facility. The offset cannot exceed the development's calculated impact on the applicable transportation facility. If the value of the dedication or improvement is more than the calculated impact for the applicable transportation facility, the County may pay the difference. An offset for roads may be allowed if the Transportation Department determines that the impact on roads created by development will be affected by off-site land dedication or improvements. 4. The County will continue to consider any circumstances about a proposed development that: (i) mitigate the development's projected impact on transportation facilities; and (ii) create a demonstrable reduction in transportation facility needs. The County, the zoning applicant, or any other person may identify and demonstrate such mitigating circumstances. 5. The County will consider unique circumstances for revitalization or preservation projects when the development proposal meets established locational or other criteria for revitalization or preservation. For development proposals considered under these circumstances, a road cash proffer will not be accepted. 6. Notwithstanding the provisions of any proffer for a dwelling unit calculated on a per unit basis and accepted in any zoning case, the County will accept the road cash proffer payment on such unit after final inspection but before issuance of a certificate of occupancy, whether temporary or final. Under no circumstances shall the County issue a certificate of occupancy for such dwelling unit until the road cash proffer for the unit has been paid in full to the County. Other proffered cash contributions, the payment of which is tied in the proffer to a particular time or event, shall continue to be payable in accordance with the terms of the proffer. Timing for dedication of property or in-kind improvements should be specified in the proffer. 7. Transportation proffers, land dedications and in-kind improvements must be used for projects identified in the Capital Improvement Program. The Capital Improvement Program is based in part on the County's Public Facilities Plan, which projects long-term facility needs. Transportation proffer payments shall be used to fund transportation facilities. Payments shall be expended in accordance with state law. 2723:97339.1 Page 3 of 000034 8. The Board of Supervisors has established $9,400 as the maximum per dwelling unit road cash proffer that it will accept in a zoning case to address the transportation impacts of a proposed new residential development on the County's transportation facilities. Revised: September 18, 2013 Policy reaffirmed June 24, 2015 Revised: September 28, 2016 2723:97339.1 Page 4 of 4 ®®®® 9/28/2016 Cash Proffer Reform A Transition to Roads and a Stronger Community County Administration September 28, 2016 Agenda 9/28/2016 Cash Proffers In Chesterfield A new ioo.# Armen oy broader obieca ves • Eliminate barriers to desired/appropriate land development • Incentivize revitalization -preservation projects • State code modifications • Reduce confusion and administrative burdens thereby improving zoning/permitting processes Cash Proffers In Chesterfield AcfiaessinceimI • Review with staff (CIP, methodology, constraints) • Meetings with regional peers • Meetings with builders and developers • Meeting with HBA, Realtors Association, Business Assoc. • Feedback from citizens while out in the community • Meetings with Board members, Planning Commission members, School Board members 2 9/28/2016 Cash Proffers In Chesterfield • Methodology established with building industry • Utilized industry recognized impact model • Implemented during strong housing growth periods • Impact calc approximated utility connection charge • Deployed a 3 year phase in approach • Revenue generation much delayed due to existing zoning Elements of Proposal Elievinoosoot ofiatoand /ono/ast/aocommllt7N8s • Existing $18,966: while mathematically sound, creates economic impediments • Propose: $9,400 dedicated for roads • Leverage road proffer with State revenue sharing/ other programs Parks $1,027 n/a rm Transportation $9,605 n/a �r 1 Y .; � $9 3 9/28/2016 Elements of Proposal Encoara9ea10101AN 1,90aad iongiasHngcomNININes • Mitigate reliance on proffer funding source and road calculation volatility • Propose: remove inflation index • When residential -commercial tax base has positive impacts, options include: • Reduced tax burdens • Reduce road proffer • Reinvest in capital/service improvements 4 Fundingfor Infrastructure Residenlisiimpact-eapaciNfeeeomparisen • Engineer -defined for new homes in "service area" • Demands and capacities are driving factors • Existing customers/citizens fees/taxes are for operating costs and overall safety improvements • Goal is to ensure infrastructure is not constrained by growth Elements of Proposal Encoara9ea10101AN 1,90aad iongiasHngcomNININes • Mitigate reliance on proffer funding source and road calculation volatility • Propose: remove inflation index • When residential -commercial tax base has positive impacts, options include: • Reduced tax burdens • Reduce road proffer • Reinvest in capital/service improvements 4 9/28/2016 Elements of Proposal 111COMS1880014010tea9d /899/8sd99cemm99/ties • Individualized reviews result in range: $9,400 to $0 • Propose: examination of transportation needs on case by case basis • Road cash proffer amounts may vary, depending on: • Location of request • Analysis of impacts, based on applicant's engineering • County's Transportation Dept and Developer's engineer review transportation impact • Revitalization and preservation Elements of Proposal E9co9�geappnDp�atea9d /099/0sd9gcemm991aes • Incentivize revitalization -preservation area redevelopment into desired communities • Propose: $0 proffer using defined locations/criteria • Location/criteria presented at Dec. 14th Board meeting • Additional proposals for revitalization -preservation forthcoming: Housing rehabilitation tax program 5 Elements of Proposal E2ce2r OV800rop1atee2d /820/asti20comm22ities • Reduce confusion and administrative burdens • Propose: No annual updates • Eliminate efforts to capture non -road proffer variables that previously impacted proffer calcs Elements of Proposal meoursoesomptlatesnd 182018sb20commomes • Define/improve customer service standards and visionary development goals collaboratively with stakeholders • Propose: create customer -driven input process to assess and improve service levels • Benchmark with best -in -class localities • Analyze private sector provided business models to gain appreciation for cost drivers/ revenue streams • Including impact of time from prolonged processes 9/28/2016 N 9/28/2016 Elements of Proposal Encoarsoesppnvpifateand /ono/asdnocommaoNes • Road proffer revenue mitigates tax rate burden for roads • Citizen expectation that road improvements (with State match) are paid by new developments • Maximize impact and benefit Elements of Proposal Encoaisoeapp1ANIOfeRNA /ono/asdnocommomes • Work with developers, builders, others to lobby for equitable share of state road funding • Propose: Establish legislative initiative for equitable funding to better position transportation sheds for even less reliance on road proffers Elements of Proposal Enc8089e8001401181e8219 /ong/asOngcommamties • Develop process to enable previously approved cases to be re -submitted at current, appropriate case -design standards and proffers • Propose: report back on proposed process by Oct 26th Board meeting Elements of Proposal EncoaIVges001VOI/atesnd /eng/aS9111Comm011j es • Establish distinctions among commercial project categories (residentially -driven vs. jobs -driven) to best position for positive commercial impact • Set goals for quality of life standards, e.g.: • 1:1 jobs to workers ratio • Average commute times < 25 minutes • Connectivity among different properties/ land uses • Propose: address via Comprehensive Plan review, including benchmarked objectives 9/28/2016 E 9/28/2016 Elements of Proposal 111CON81eappropJI81eand 10#0 MOOCOmmumties • Recognize new resident impacts and need for continuum of service, particularly schools • Propose: Continue Five Year CIP planning process • Collaborate with schools/ other prior proffer recipients to establish capital facility metrics • Realize that existing proffer cases in active development provide revenue base • Engage School Board, School Superintendent and school administration in solution discussions Implementation Actions • Effective date: • Cases not yet approved by Board evaluated under new policy • Cases previously approved by Board not affected, unless brought forward by applicant • Any such case subject to complete review under current ordinances, plans and policies 0 Implementation Actions &MOte c%ainotWCOMenprocess • Communication methods • Media outlets • Through existing processes: applicant queries, pre - application conferences, zoning case filings • Notice to developer and professional associations • Sept 27th Quarterly Developers Meeting • Feedback received positive and supportive Cash Proffer Reform A Transition to Roads and a Stronger Community County Administration September 28, 2016 9/28/2016 10 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 1 of 1 AGENDA\�kcnvi*�5 Meetinq D.te: September 28, 2016 Item Number: Deferred Item - Consideration of Code Amendments Relating to Requirements Pertaining to Utility System Connections for Dwelling Units and Manufactured Homes . ;• County Administrator:�� r Hoard Action Reguested: Consider a revised amendment to X18 -60(A) of Chapter 18 - Water and Sewers of the Countv Code. At the August 24, 2016 meeting, the Board of Supervisors held a public hearing to consider amendments to Chapter 18 of the County Code. The public hearing was closed and the Board approved the recommended amendments to the County Code with the exception of language pertaining to X18 -60(A) Required use of the utility system (residential). Action on this section was deferred until the September 28, 2016 meeting while consideration was given to removing the two year limitation for redeveloped lots to utilize their existing private wells or onsite sewer systems. After consultation with the Department of Planning, the Department of Building Inspection and the Health Department, the time limitation has been removed. This allows property owners to continue to use their private systems with health department approval. The property could still connect to the public water and/or wastewater systems, if available. The revised proposed ordinance is attached. -r. George B. Haves P.11 Attachments:No Title: Director of Utilities •' •, ,_�. • DE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County: (1) That Section 18-60 of the Code of the County of Chesterfield, 1997, as amended, is amended and re-enacted, to read as follows: Chapter 18 000 Sec. 18-60. - Required use of utility system. The distance extensions described in this section shall be measured from the nearest existing line as measured along the most reasonable extension route, as determined by the director of utilities. A. Residential.For- the pufposes of this the tema "dwelling unitshall be as defined in ehaptef 19.1 " 9 This section shall not apply to the replacement of a dwelling unit or manufactured home which was served by a private well or onsite sewer system, provided that aad shall not �Nelude n dwelling unit that is being rebuilt due to damage by J flood, J 7 or- other aet of God pfovided sue r-eeanst+ttetien E)eeuf s within two . of the ,aa g -e- a the new dwelling unit or manufactured home uses the private system(s) which were used by the replaced unit or home; and continued use of the existing private system(s) is approved by the health department. 000 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY AGENDA 1 inqSeptember 28, 0 Number:Item 1 Appointment of Trustees to the Supplemental Retirement Plan The Board of Supervisors is requested to",,, appoint a new Trustee to the Supplemental Retirement Plan (Plan). The Plan provides supplemental retirement benefits to long-term employees in leadership positions hired prior to July 1, 2012. The primary responsibility of the Trustees is to administer the Plan for the exclusive benefit of the Participants and their Beneficiaries, subject to the specific terms of the Plan. The Trustees shall have the power and discretion to construe the terms of the Plan and to determine all questions arising in connection with the administration, interpretation, and application of the Plan. The Board of Supervisors shall appoint three (3) or more persons to serve as Trustees at the pleasure of the Board. Mr. Richard Cordle will step down as a Trustee of the Plan on September 30, 2016. Thierry Dupuis, Mary Lou Lyle and Craig Bryant will continue to serve as Trustees. The Board of Supervisors is requested to appoint Scott Zaremba as Trustee, effective October 1, 2016. Mr. Zaremba has indicated his willingness to serve. Preparer: Mary Martin -Selby Title: Director, Human Resource Services Attachments: Yes No ao CHESTERFIELD BOARD OF SUPERVISORSPage 1 of AGENDA Meeting Date: September 28, 2016 Item Number: 8.A.2. Nomination and Appointment of Directors to the GRTC Transit System Board of Directors and Authorization to Elect Directors at the GRTC Annual Meeting The Board is requested to nominate and appoint three directors to the GRTC Board for one-year terms, effective October 10, 2016, and expiring October 9, 2017, and to authorize the County Administrator or his designee to appear at the GRTC annual meeting to vote for the directors appointed by the Board and by the Richmond City Council. GRTC is a publicly -owned corporation which was formed to provide public transportation services in the Richmond regional area. Chesterfield County and the City of Richmond each own 50 percent of the GRTC as its two sole shareholders. GRTC is governed by a six -member board of directors, three appointed by the Chesterfield Board of Supervisors and three by the Richmond City Council. The terms for the county's current GRTC Directors, (Daniel K. Smith, David Matthews and Gary Armstrong), will expire on October 9, 2016. Mr. Smith, Mr. Matthews and Mr. Armstrong have agreed to continue to serve and submitted applications. No other applications were received for appointment to the GRTC Board. Under the GRTC by-laws, the Board may reappoint the current directors Attachments: Yes No # CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 2 of 2 AGENDA Summary of Information: (Continued) to the next term or may appoint new directors. There are no eligibility requirements to serve as a director on the GRTC Board. Board members concur with reappointment of the current directors. Directors are appointed each year for one-year terms beginning in October. The Board is requested to consider nominees for appointment to the GRTC Transit System Board of Directors. Under the existing Rules of Procedure, appointments to boards and committees are nominated at one meeting and appointed at the subsequent meeting unless the Rules of Procedure are suspended by a unanimous vote of the Board members present. Nominees are voted on in the order in which they are nominated. The GRTC Articles require the county and the City of Richmond, as GRTC's shareholders, to vote at the annual meeting for the three directors appointed by the other jurisdiction. The Board should, therefore, also authorize the County Administrator or his designee to appear at the annual meeting and vote on behalf of the county for the GRTC Directors. ��_= •._ .•. Staff recommends the Board: 1) Nominate/ reappoint Daniel K. Smith® David Matthews and Gary Armstrong to serve on the GRTC Board of Directors for the one-year term through October 9, 2017. 2) Authorize the County Administrator or his designee to appear at the annual meeting and vote on behalf of the county for the GRTC Directors appointed by the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors and by the Richmond City Council. CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD - OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA , l;, �BCEN; Meeting Date: September 28, 2016 Item Number: 8.A.3. Nominations/Appointments to the Youth Services Citizen Board Nominate/appoint members to serve on"the Youth Services Citizen Board. The purpose of the Youth Services Citizen Board is to advise the Board of Supervisors regarding planning and policies affecting youth development and to provide a community forum to focus on youth issues, Bermuda District® Supervisor Jaeckle recommends that the Board nominate and appoint Deanndra Richards, a Thomas Dale High School student, for a term of September 1, 2016, through June 30, 2017. Ms. Richards meets all the eligibility requirements to fill the vacancy and has indicated her willingness to serve. Matoaca District. Supervisor Elswick recommends that the board nominate and appoint George O'Brien, a Manchester High School student, for the term of September 1, 2016, through June 30, 2017. Mr. O'Brien meets all eligibility requirements to fill the vacancy and has indicated his willingness to serve. -rCarter Attachments: El Yes Title: Director, Juvenile Services No AGENDA Under the existing Rules of Procedure, appointments to boards and committees are nominated at one meeting and appointed at the subsequent meeting unless the Rules of Procedure are suspended by a unanimous vote of the Board members present. CHESTERFIELD i -BOARD OF SUPERVISORSPage 1 of 1 =ynAGENDA Meetinq Date: September 28, 2016 Item ilumber: 8.A.4. Nomination/Appointment to the Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission County Administrator: Board Action Requested: i Nominate/ appoint one member to serve on the Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission. The Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission is a panel of County citizens who act as a liaison between the public, the Board of Supervisors, and the County Administration. The Commission reviews public input concerning parks and recreation facility development and programs and will work closely with the Department of Parks and Recreation to advise on long- range planning policy directions and other critical issues. Mr. Vincent Burgess fulfilled his ter representative on the Parks and Recreation December 31, 2015. The Board received an Arch, a Clover Hill resident, to serve on recommended that the Board nominate and Hill District vacancy. The term will be expire on December 31, 2019. n as a Clover Hill District i Advisory Commission that ended application from Ms. Mary Ellin. the Commission. Mr. Winslow has appoint Ms. Arch to the Clover effective immediately and will Under the existing Rules of Procedure, appointments to boards and committees are nominated at one meeting and appointed at the subsequent meeting unless the Rules of Procedure are suspended by a unanimous vote of the Board members present. ]Wreparer. James D. Worsley Title: Director,��e Attachments: Yes No CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS 4 , � Meeting Date: September 28, 2016 Item Number: Appointment to the Board of Directors of the Richmond Metropolitan Transportation Authority Count/ Administrator: Board Action Requested: �. The Board is requested to nominate/appoint/reappoint members to serve on the Board of Directors of the Richmond Metropolitan Transportation Authority (RMTA) . In 1966, a Board of Directors was formed to govern the Richmond Metropolitan Authority (RMA). Duties of the Board of Directors include passing resolutions; approving the annual budget; monitoring the organization's finances; voting upon measures; approving debt issuances; setting tolls; and selecting, appointing, supporting and reviewing the performance of the General Manager. In 2014, the name of the RMA Board of Directors was changed to the Richmond Metropolitan Transportation Authority (RMTA). In addition, the Board of Directors was expanded so that Chesterfield, Henrico and Richmond each have five representatives; there is one appointee from the Commonwealth Transportation Board. There are four standing committees (finance, audit, personnel and nominating) on the RMTA Board. These committees direct and assist RMTA staff with policies relating to external and internal auditors; approve human resource decisions affecting RMTA employees; and nominate chair, vice chair and secretary/general counsel positions on the Board. RMTA Board meetings are held monthly. Attachments- El Yes •�6 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Paige 2 of AGENDA The Chesterfield Board of Supervisors appoints five representatives for a term of four years and one of these five representatives may be from the county's Board of Supervisors. The current RMTA Directors appointed by the Board are Dale District Supervisor James Holland, Mr. A. Dale Cannady, Mr. Charles R. "Dick" White, Mr. Gregory Whirley and Mr. Bill Woodfin. Mr. Cannady's term expires September 30, 2016, and he is not seeking reappointment. Board members concur with the appointment of Mr® Lane B. Ramsey for a term effective October 1, 2016, and expiring September 30, 2020. Under the existing Rules of Procedure, appointments to boards and committees are nominated at one meeting and appointed at the subsequent meeting, unless the Rules of Procedure are suspended by a unanimous vote of the Board members present. Nominees are voted on in the order in which they are nominated. f �'lucra« D COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Meeting Date: September 28, 2016 Item Number: 83. Streetlight Cost Approvals This item requests Board approval of streetlight installations in the Matoaca District and authorize the transfer of District Improvement Funds to Streetlights to fund these projects. Requests for streetlights, from individual citizens or civic groups, are received in the Department of Environmental Engineering. Staff requests cost quotations from Dominion Virginia Power for each request received. When the quotations are received, staff re-examines each request and presents them at the next available regular meeting of the Board of Supervisors for consideration. Staff provides the Board with an evaluation of each request based on the following criteria: 1. Streetlights should be located at intersections and 2. A petition is required which must be signed by 75 percent of the residents within 200 feet of the proposed light and shall include a majority of the homeowners living at the proposed locations. O! b' k z -•arer: Scott B. Smedley- •r, Environmental• - r Attachments: Yes ❑ No # CHESTERFIELD COUNTY OF SUPERVISORS Page 2 of iE- ;c Cost quotations from Dominion Virginia Power are valid for a period of 60 days. The Board, upon presentation of the cost quotation, may approve, defer, or deny the expenditure of funds from available District Improvement Funds for the streetlight installation. If the expenditure is approved, staff authorizes Dominion Virginia Power to install the streetlight. A denial of a project will result in its cancellation and the District Improvement Fund will be charged the design cost shown; staff will notify the requestor of the denial. Projects cannot be deferred for more than 30 days due to quotation expiration. Quotation expiration has the same effect as a denial. ® In the Woods at Summerford subdivision At the intersection of Orchid Drive and Orchid Terrace Cost to install streetlight: $859.53 (Design Cost: $435.00) Location meets policy criteria ® In the Bayhill Pointe subdivision At the southeast corner of the intersection of Bailey Bridge Road and Battlecreek Drive Cost to install streetlight: $2,009.99 (Design Cost: $435.00) Location meets policy criteria for intersection and petition, but is within 200 feet of an existing streetlight and would result in a second light at this intersection. For information regarding available balances in the District Improvement Fund accounts, please reference the District Improvement Fund Report. ENUMM ofzm�� NAME OF REQUESTOR: The Woods at Surnmerford Homeowners Associatior,, ADDRESS: Ms. Marcy Peacock, Community Manager 3901 Westerre Parkway Suite 100 Richmond, VA 23233 In the Woods at Surnmerford subdivision At the intersection • Orchid Drive and Orchid Terrace Cost to install streetlight: $859.53 'OLICY CRITERIA: Intersection: Qualified Petition: Qualified Streetlight Reqluest Map September 28, 2016 M1 RFO 00 C HILL C,�, A HILL L LU CO OPORD PK\Jq-$� ................. ------- This map is a copyrighted product of This map shows citizen requested the Chesterfield County GIS Officestreetlight installations in relation to existing streetlights. Streetlight Legend #existing light requested light Nl 700 350 0 700 Feet am, i no nwallm_ � kyj K I I or. ter. E NJ 6M I lot � "'equest Received: April 25, 2016 Estimate Requested: April 25, 201,1t _X 00=33me �� I If NAME OF REQUESTOR: Ms. Tracey O. Papiernik, President ADDRESS.- Bayhill Pointe Homeowners Association 9124 Bailey Oak Drive Midlothian, VA In the Bayhill Pointe Subdivision On the southeast corner of the intersection of Bailey Bridge Road and Battlecreek Drive Cost to install streetlight: $2,009.99 Intersection: Qualified Petition: Qualified Other: Not qualified, installation is within 200 feet of an existing streetlight and would result in a two streetlights at this intersection Requestor Comments: "The Bayhill Pointe Board of Directors requested the street light at the intersection of Battlecreek Drive and Bailey Bridge Road due to the comments received at the 2016 annual meeting in January. Several residents in Bayhill Pointe commented that the turn from Bailey Bridge Road onto Battlecreek Drive was dangerous because it is poorly lit. 11-74URNAM 1 1 fl I R I I LIP: Staff notes that this installation is on the southeast corner of the noted intersection; there is already an existing light on the northeast corner. Approval of funding for this installation also requires the Board of Supervisors grant two exceptions to the Streetlight Policy: (1) to permit the installation of a new streetlight within 200 feet of an existing streetlight and (2) to permit the installation a second light at an intersection. Staff further notes that the total cost of this installation is $4,019.99. The Bayhill Pointe Homeowners Association has agreed to fund $2,010.00 of the cost. Streetlight Request Map September 28, 2016 This map Is a copyhghted product of the, Chesterfield County GIS Office. Streetlight Legend existing light requested light U00 500 Prodw*C� ChastrNO Countj,G4 This map shows cifizen requested streetlight installations in relation to existing streetlights - 1,000 Feet 6 0 I'D CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Meeting Date: September 28, 2016 Item ilumber: &C.1.a.i. Resolution Recognizing Firefighter Frank S. Chinn, Fire and Emergency Medical Services Department, Upon His Retirement Adoption of attached resolution. Firefighter Frank S. Chinn retired from the Fire and Emergency Medical Services Department on January 1, 2016, after providing more than 27 years of service to the residents of Chesterfield County. �Teparer: Edward L. Senter Jr. Attachments: Yes WIM 0 No #-1 4 2 V-1 U �U'U".j RECOGNIZING FIREFIGHTER FRANK S. CHINN UPON HIS RETIREMENT WHEREAS, Firefighter Frank S. Chinn retired from the Chesterfield Fire and Emergency Medical Services Department, Chesterfield County, on January 1, 2016; and WHEREAS, Firefighter Chinn attended Recruit School #19 in October 1988 and has faithfully served the county for more than 27 years in various assignments as a firefighter at the Ettrick, Chester, Dutch Gap, Buford Road, and Clover Hill Fire and EMS Stations and as a Flight Paramedic at Med- Flight; and WHEREAS, Firefighter Chinn graduated from the region's first paramedic class held at the Medical College of Virginia in 1981; and WHEREAS, Firefighter Chinn used his experience and extraordinary skills to perform a surgical airway to a trapped patient involved in a motor vehicle accident in July 1997; and WHEREAS, Firefighter Chinn was recognized with an EMS Unit Citation for a November 1997 incident for his exemplary emergency actions when he assisted in the treatment of a child with severe head trauma; and WHEREAS, Firefighter Chinn was recognized with a Unit Citation for his actions in April 1998, as part of the Med-Flight crew that assisted the Scuba Rescue Team with the water rescue of three victims; and WHEREAS, Firefighter Chinn received the Governor's EMS Award for "Outstanding EMS Prehospital Provider" in 1999; and WHEREAS, Firefighter Chinn was recognized with an EMS Lifesave Award for the successful rescue of two patients involved in a motor vehicle accident that occurred in September 2000; and WHEREAS, Firefighter Chinn was recognized with an Emergency Medical Service Lifesave Award for providing exemplary care to a patient who had been struck by a vehicle while riding a bicycle in an October 2000 accident; and WHEREAS, Firefighter Chinn was recognized with a Unit Citation with the SCUBA Rescue Team for extraordinary teamwork and efforts involving a downed plane in the Swift Creek Reservoir in November 2011; and WHEREAS, Firefighter Chinn was recognized with an EMS Unit Citation for his contribution and exemplary efforts during a vehicle accident in June 2015, while flying with Med-Flight; and WHEREAS, Firefighter Chinn will be remembered for his passion and dedication as an EMS educator and an unparalleled provider, always humble and eager to share lessons learned and experiences few will ever be able to draw from, a true patriarch in EMS who has helped to pioneer the EMS system in Chesterfield Fire and Emergency Medical Services. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors recognizes the contributions of Firefighter Frank S. Chinn, expresses the appreciation of all residents for his service to the county, and extends appreciation for his dedicated service and congratulations upon his retirement. Meeting Date: September 28, 2016 Item Number: 8.C.I.a.2. Resolution Recognizing Mr. Lance E. Mortimer, Information Systems Technology Department, Upon His Retirement Adoption of the attached resolution. Staff requests the Board adopt the attached resolution recognizing Mr. Lance E. Mortimer for 30 years of dedicated service to the Chesterfield County Information Systems Technology Department. -.�_- • •- No WHEREAS, Mr. Lance E. Mortimer will retire from the Chesterfield County Information Systems Technology Department on October 1, 2016, after providing 30 years of quality service to the citizens of Chesterfield County; and WHEREAS, Mr. Mortimer has faithfully served the county in the capacity of principal analyst programmer, application development technician, lead analyst programmer and systems analyst for the Information Systems Technology Department; and WHEREAS, Mr. Mortimer has provided outstanding customer service to all his customers through the years, including Real Estate Assessor's Office, General Services, Treasurer, Planning, Utilities, County Payroll, Human Resource Management and Accounting; and WHEREAS, Mr. Mortimer was instrumental in the implementation of the first Computer Aided Mass Appraisal System, the Chesterfield Quality System, the Waste and Resource Recovery Point of Sale System and the Time and Attendance System; and WHEREAS, Mr. Mortimer worked diligently to prepare the computer systems for the Year 2000 transition, as well as the OS390 mainframe operating system upgrade and the transition to MicroFocus, constantly sharing information and knowledge with co-workers; and WHEREAS, Mr. Mortimer led the effort to modernize the point of sale systems at the General Service Convenience Centers, often working nights and weekends on location in the centers; and WHEREAS, Mr. Mortimer graduated from the Total Quality University and committed himself to education and advancing his technical skills by taking classes in SQL Server Database Development, Crystal Reports Levels 1 and 2, Visual Basic and Project Management; and WHEREAS, Mr. Mortimer was active in department activities, serving as Santa Claus for many years during department Christmas celebrations; and WHEREAS, Mr. Mortimer is a talented and proficient employee who has provided many years of valued service to his customers and has helped his co- workers immensely with his knowledge over the years; and WHEREAS, Chesterfield County and the Board of Supervisors will miss Mr. Mortimer's commitment and dedication to the county. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors recognizes Mr. Lance E. Mortimer, and extends on behalf of its members and the citizens of Chesterfield County, appreciation for his service to the county, congratulations upon his retirement, and best wishes for a long and happy retirement. A 01 1�_" n" � Meeting Date: September 28, 2016 Item Number: &C.1.a.3. Resolution Recognizing Mr. Robert C. Key, Jr., Director, Department of General Services, Upon His Retirement Adoption of the attached resolution. Mr. Key will retire from the Department of General Services as director, effective December 1, 2016, after more than 15 years of service to the citizens of Chesterfield County. "reparer: Rebecca T. Dickson Attachments: 0 Yes F -I No RESOLUTION RECOGNIZING MR. ROBERT C. KEY, JR. UPON HIS RETIREMENT WHEREAS, Mr. Robert C. Key, Jr. will retire from Chesterfield County, Department of General Services, as director, effective December 1, 2016, with more than 15 years of service to Chesterfield County and its citizens; and WHEREAS, Mr. Key began his career with the county in March 2001 as assistant director of the Department of General Services, and through diligent effort and dedication was promoted in October 2007 to his present position of director; and WHEREAS, Mr. Key led a department of several diverse operating divisions, including administration, airport services, buildings and grounds maintenance, capital projects management, document services, energy management, environmental management, fleet services, radio communications, and security management, each providing exceptional services to Chesterfield County citizens and departments; and WHEREAS, Mr. Key has provided exceptional leadership to numerous capital projects resulting in new and renovated county facilities that contribute positively to the quality of life for county residents including the completion of the Harrowgate Road Fire Station, the Fire Logistics Warehouse and the North Courthouse Library; and WHEREAS, Mr. Key was instrumental in securing funding for and completing numerous restoration projects for historic properties including the restoration of the 1917 Courthouse, Castlewood and the Historic Jail; and WHEREAS, Mr. Key implemented numerous energy efficiency measures including the county's first energy services contract and Energy Efficiency Conservation Block Grant; and WHEREAS, Mr. Key raised the bar of excellence through his contributions to strategic planning and total quality improvement by being a key player in the development of the Department of General Services' action planning process that focuses on employee input and takes planning efforts from strategic to operational implementation; and WHEREAS, Mr. Key was instrumental in the implementation of career development programs for automotive technicians and skilled maintenance workers, completion of the Department of General Services' website, implementation of the MAINSTAR facility management work order system, and providing leadership to establish the county's first records management policy; and WHEREAS, Mr. Key fulfilled his obligations as director in a stellar fashion while serving on numerous boards and committees, such as representing Chesterfield County on the Central Virginia Waste Management Authority (CVWMA) Board beginning in July 2010, in which he served as Treasurer, July 2012 to June 2013, as Vice -Chairman, July 2013 to June 2014, and as Chairman, July 2014 to June 2016, and he also served on the Airport Advisory Board, Capital Improvement Plan Committee, Veterans Recognition Committee, Energy Management Team, Fleet Steering Committee, Information Security Steering Committee (ISSC), Information Technology Advisory Group (ITAG), Management Services Performance Council, and the School of Policy and Practice Advisory Board; and WHEREAS, Mr. Key has embraced his role as director throughout his years of service in a professional and dedicated manner resulting in strong customer satisfaction and tremendous contributions to the county's and the Department of General Services' missions, all the while building effective and ongoing relationships both internally and externally. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors recognizes the outstanding contributions of Mr. Robert C. Key, Jr., expresses the appreciation of all residents for his service to Chesterfield County, and extends appreciation for his dedicated service to the County and congratulations upon his retirement, as well as best wishes for a long and happy retirement. R • CAW AGENDA Meeting Date: September 28, 2016 Item Number: &C.1.a.4. 91= Resolution Recognizing Mr. Willie B. Wilson, III, Department of General Services, Buildings and Grounds Division, Upon His Retirement County Administrator - Z"' Board Action Reguested- Adoption of the attached resolution. Mr. Wilson retired from the Department of General Services, Buildings and Grounds Division, on September 1, 2016, after more than 15 years of service to the citizens of Chesterfield County. Attachments: my] No RESOLUTION RECOGNIZING MR. WILLIE B. WILSON, III UPON HIS RETIREMENT WHEREAS, Mr. Willie B. Wilson, III, was hired by Chesterfield County, in February 2001, in the Department of Environmental Engineering as a sign installer; and WHEREAS, Mr. Wilson joined the Department of General Services in the Buildings and Grounds Division in July 2005 as a labor crew chief; and WHEREAS, Mr. Wilson demonstrated his commitment to the county and contributed to a positive work environment; and WHEREAS, Mr. Wilson was always willing to assist the members of the Buildings and Grounds' teams by sharing his knowledge and skills; and WHEREAS, Mr. Wilson strove to improve job efficiency by working with other crafts in the Buildings and Grounds Division, which helped to build a team approach throughout the whole division; and WHEREAS, Mr. Wilson was very safety conscious and did a tremendous job leading Buildings and Grounds' meetings that emphasized the importance of safety; and WHEREAS, Mr. Wilson was a hands-on supervisor and remained with the team until the work was completed; and WHEREAS, Mr. Wilson always demonstrated enthusiasm for his work, provided quality service, and adhered to high ethical standards of behavior; and WHEREAS, Mr. Wilson's pleasant personality enabled him to achieve positive results when dealing with Buildings and Grounds' customers; and WHEREAS, Mr. Wilson supported Chesterfield County's goals, objectives and values through professionalism and teamwork. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors recognizes the outstanding contributions of Mr. Willie B. Wilson, III, expresses the appreciation of all residents for his service to Chesterfield County, and extends appreciation for his dedicated service to the county and congratulations upon his retirement, as well as best wishes for a long and happy retirement. kx>to' < ( 9,a, CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD SUPERVISORS a ¥:va,. BOARD OFSUP«R<ISORS AGENDA ormi /j Meeting Date: September 28«f<V Item © 22 *f»: *2 < ` � Resolution Recognizing Corporal John S. Farmer, Jr., Police Department, Upon His Retirement Adoption of the attached resolution. 2«y«§V«<#f(?\+2v2#2� Corporal John S. Farmer, Jr., will retire from the Police Department on October 1, 2016, after providing over 28 years of service to the residents of Chesterfield County. Prep» f» Colonel Thierry G. Dupuis Attachments: M Yes y2 « RECOGNIZING CORPORAL JOHN S. FARMER, JR. UPON HIS RETIREMENT WHEREAS, Corporal John S. Farmer, Jr., will retire from the Chesterfield County Police Department on October 1, 2016, after providing over 28 years of outstanding quality service to the residents of Chesterfield County; and WHEREAS, Corporal Farmer has faithfully served the county in the capacity of Patrol Officer, Detective, Senior Detective, Master Detective, Career Detective and Corporal; and WHEREAS, during his tenure, Corporal Farmer also served as Field Training Officer and as a member of the Special Response Unit; and WHEREAS, Corporal Farmer had the distinction of being selected as 2011 Detective of the Year; and WHEREAS, Corporal Farmer has been a member of the Fugitive Unit since its inception in 1999; and WHEREAS, Corporal Farmer has served on two task forces to include the Richmond Area Fugitive Task Force, where he served with Virginia State Police authority and the Capital Area Regional Task Force, where he served as a Special Deputy U.S. Marshal; and WHEREAS, Corporal Farmer was the recipient of a Chief's Commendation for his role in reducing the 1700 outstanding warrants by over half during a six- month period through the capture of wanted fugitives and for the development of a "Most Wanted Persons" segment that aired multiple times each day on a Comcast Cable channel; and WHEREAS, Corporal Farmer received two Unit Citations and a Chief's Commendation for his tireless efforts and dedication to duty in apprehending wanted fugitives and reducing outstanding warrants, utilizing innovative investigation approaches, and developing close working relationships and fostering regional cooperation with other federal, state and local agencies; and WHEREAS, Corporal Farmer received a Chief's Commendation working jointly with another detective for his perseverance and determination in arresting an individual who had evaded capture for over a year by using 15 aliases and multiple social security numbers, and the individual was served with 37 felony warrants from Chesterfield County along with 11 warrants from other jurisdictions; and WHEREAS, Corporal Farmer was recognized by local, state and federal agencies for his exemplary efforts in executing warrants leading to the apprehension of a significant number of violent fugitives; and WHEREAS, Corporal Farmer's supervisors consistently cited his persistence, dedication and strong work ethic focused on his relentless pursuit of wanted fugitives while maintaining an upbeat can -do attitude; and WHEREAS, Corporal Farmer was instrumental in convincing two local television stations to begin including segments pertaining to "most wanted fugitives" weekly during their nightly newscasts; and WHEREAS, Corporal Farmer is recognized for his excellent communications and human relations skills, his professionalism and his teamwork, all of which he has utilized within the Police Department and in assisting residents of Chesterfield County; and WHEREAS, during his tenure, Corporal Farmer has received numerous letters of commendation, thanks and appreciation for services rendered; and WHEREAS, Corporal Farmer has provided the Chesterfield County Police Department with many years of loyal and dedicated service; and WHEREAS, Chesterfield County and the Board of Supervisors will miss Corporal Farmer's diligent service. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors recognizes Corporal John S. Farmer, Jr., and extends on behalf of its members and the residents of Chesterfield County, appreciation for his service to the county, congratulations upon his retirement, and best wishes for a long and happy retirement. CHESTERFIELD C' AGENDABOARD OF SUPERVISORS Meetinq Date: September 28, 2016 Item Number: 8.C.l.b. Resolution Recognizing Senior Battalion Chief David C. Creasy, Sr. (Retired), Chesterfield Fire and Emergency Medical Services Department, for His Efforts in Curating the Chesterfield County Fire Museum Mr. Elswick has requested the Board adopt the attached resolution. Senior Battalion Chief David C. Creasy, Sr. (retired) has spent countless hours of his personal time collecting historical artifacts and materials to assemble a visual history of the Chesterfield County Fire Department, now known as Chesterfield Fire and Emergency Medical Services. Preparer: Edward L. Senter Jr. Title: Fire Chief Attachments: Yes No RECOGNIZING SR. BATTALION CHIEF DAVID C. CREASY, SR. FOR HIS WORK ON THE CHESTERFIELD FIRE MUSEUM WHEREAS, Mr. David C. Creasy, Sr. was employed by Chesterfield County Fire and Emergency Medical Services from 1974 until 2001, retiring as a Senior Battalion Chief; and WHEREAS, Chief Creasy served as a volunteer firefighter with the Manchester Volunteer Fire Department from 1968 until his hiring in 1974; and WHEREAS, Chief Creasy has taken a personal interest in the history of the Chesterfield Fire Department, now known as Chesterfield Fire and Emergency Medical Services; and - WHEREAS, Chief Creasy has collected a number of artifacts, photographs and materials related to the history of the fire department; and WHEREAS, Chief Creasy used his vast knowledge of department history and his collection of photographs to publish a book on the history of the Chesterfield Fire Department in 2012; and WHEREAS, Chief Creasy assembled various artifacts and materials to curate a display of fire department history at the Chesterfield County Museum in October 2013; and WHEREAS, Chief Creasy has assisted in obtaining and restoring a 1935 Ford Oren pumper fire apparatus, originally owned by the Ettrick Volunteer Fire Department; and WHEREAS, Chief Creasy has donated numerous documents, artifacts and equipment to develop a permanent display of fire department history; and WHEREAS, Chief Creasy has spent countless hours of his personal time to lead an effort to assemble these historical artifacts, equipment and the Ford Oren pumper to create a fire museum at Chesterfield Fire Station #12 in Ettrick; and WHEREAS, the Chesterfield Fire Museum will open and be officially dedicated on October 2, 2016. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors recognizes the contributions of Chief David C. Creasy, Sr., expresses the appreciation of all residents for his service to the county, and extends appreciation for his dedicated service and contributions in documenting and preserving the history of the fire department. ISE I V 0= 6 1 111 ,..1. Meeting Date: September 28, 2016 Item Number: a.c.l.c. Resolution Recognizing "Paralegals' Week" in Chesterfield County Mr. Elswick requested the attached resolution be adopted, at the request of the Richmond Paralegal Association. This resolution recognizes the outstanding contributions of legal assistants and paralegals in Chesterfield County. Preparer: Janice Blakley Attachments: o RECOGNIZING "PARALEGALS' WEEK" IN CHESTERFIELD COUNTY WHEREAS, legal assistants and paralegals provide skilled and essential professional services to licensed attorneys throughout Virginia; and WHEREAS, legal assistants and paralegals receive formal education and training and gain valuable experience working under the supervision of licensed attorneys; and WHEREAS, the Virginia Alliance of Paralegals Associations (VAPA) issues educational standards and professional guidelines to ensure that legal assistants are competent and knowledgeable about their field; and WHEREAS, the research and administrative work performed by legal assistants and paralegals are essential to the ability of attorneys to provide their clients with quality legal services and representation; and WHEREAS, VAPA member organizations sponsor educational programs, seminars and forums designed to bring legal assistants together to exchange ideas and methods used in their occupation; and WHEREAS, the VAPA encourages legal assistants and paralegals to adhere to a high degree of ethical and professional conduct and proficiency by issuing a code of ethics for legal assistants and paralegals to practice. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors recognizes "Paralegals' Week" in Chesterfield County and calls its significance to the attention of all its citizens. WMEMI AGENDA iFITIMI W& Meeting Date: September 28, 2016 Item Number: 8.C.l.d. Resolution Recognizing October as artoberVA, a Celebration of Arts and Culture Across the Richmond Region oil Adoption of the attached resolution. artoberVA is a month-long celebration of arts and culture held each year in October, in conjunction with National Arts and Humanities month. The goal of artoberVA is to increase awareness of and participation in arts and culture offerings across the region during October and throughout the year. Preparer: Sarah C. Snead Title: Deputy County Administrat Attachments. 0 Yes El No RECOGNIZING A MONTH-LONG CELEBRATION IN OCTOBER OF ARTS AND CULTURE ACROSS THE RICHMOND REGION CALLED artoberVA WHEREAS, Chesterfield County has a thriving arts and culture community and contributes to the Richmond and Tri -Cities Region becoming a destination the world is noticing; and WHEREAS, arts and culture in the region is bringing prosperity to the area; and WHEREAS, Chesterfield County has been making headlines, most recently as "The 17th Best Place to Live in America1° and "One of the 100 Best Communities in America for Young People" and recognizes that a vibrant arts and culture community adds to these accolades; and WHEREAS, Chesterfield County's cultural vibrancy resonates in our theaters, galleries, museums, studios and schools, from the recognition of important heritage at sites such as Henricus Historical Park to the emerging of creative talent represented by the forthcoming Chesterfield Center for the Arts, and many other arts and culture organizations and artists that support the county; and WHEREAS, October is recognized as National Arts and Humanities Month, CultureWorks has chosen October as artoberVA, a month-long celebration of arts and culture throughout the region, and we commit to ensuring every Chesterfield County resident has the opportunity to experience arts and culture where they live, work and play. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors recognizes October as artoberVA for Chesterfield County, Virginia and invite citizens to celebrate, engage and participate in arts and culture as it brings prosperity and vitality to the region. BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 1o1 N AGENDA 4eeting Date: September 28, 2016 Item Number: 8.C.2. Acceptance of FY2017 Highway Safety Project Grants Awarded by the Department of Motor Vehicles County Administrator: Board Action eguested: Accept and appropriate FY2017 Highway Safety Project grants, in the amount of $255,789, from the Department of Motor Vehicles for the purpose of speed and alcohol enforcement activities. • •Int 4TON Grant awards have been made for speed enforcement and DUI enforcement in the total amount of $255,789, to be used for overtime activities and equipment. The Speed Enforcement grant award is $79,540, and the Alcohol Enforcement grant award is $176,249. Funds will support overtime for officer participation in directed patrols and enforcement activities for DUI and speeding. Funds will also support officer participation in one educational conference, and the purchase of equipment, such as radar sets and breathalyzers, to improve the ability of officers to perform the proposed enforcement activities. There is a 50 percent match requirement of $127,894 that covers both grants, which will be met through in-kind fuel expenses incurred during the project activities. The funding for the fuel is already included in the department's FY2017 adopted operating budget. Preparer: Colonel Thierry G. QupL�is Preparer: Allan •• Attachments: D Yes • '• NNIMNIF MmXrre•- .�' .•- - B*ARD OF AS i .a Meeting Date: September 28, 2016 Item Number: B.C.3. Authorize the Receipt and Appropriation of Grant Funds from the Department of Homeland Security for the 2015 Assistance to Firefighters (AFG) Grant Program County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Authorize the Fire and EMS Department to receive and appropriate $405,840 in grant funds from the Department of Homeland Security, 2015 Assistance to Firefighters (AFG) Grant Program, to support the department's officer development program. The Board of Supervisors is requested to approve the acceptance and appropriation of $405,840 in grant funds awarded by the Department of Homeland Security, 2015 Assistance to Firefighters Grant (AFG) Program, for the Chesterfield Fire and EMS officer development program. The grant will support the department's efforts to train and certify all lieutenants, captains and chief officers in accordance with National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) 1021 Standard for Fire Officer Professional Qualifications. The project total for the grant is $446,424, which includes a required $40,584 local match that will be covered by funding in the Chesterfield Fire and EMS Training Division operating budget. The grant will cover instructional costs, training materials and staffing "back-fills" in emergency operations. Preparer: Edward L. Senter, Jr. Title: Fire Chief 000 a,I AGENDA .7` 1,. Meeting Date: September 28, 2016 Item Number: 8.C.4.a. Set Date for Public Hearing to Consider Amending Section 9-14 of the County Code Relating to Procedures for Appealing Real Estate Assessments r1111110 1 Milt The Board is requested to set a public hearing for October 26, 2016, to consider amending § 9-14 of the County Code relating to procedures for appealing real estate assessments. V��MMITVTZFIFFTr Section 9-14(b) of the County Code currently requires property owners who wish to appeal their annual real estate assessment to file an appeal and appear in-person before the real estate assessor to present objections to the assessment. The proposed amendment would eliminate the requirement that property owners appear in-person and would allow them to present their objections by filing the appeal forms provided by the office of real estate assessments. For consistency with the assessor's procedures for formal appeals to the Board of Equalization, the proposed amendment also clarifies that the postmark date on the appeal forms will be considered the date of receipt of the appeal by the assessor's office. In order to simplify the appeal process, the Department of Real Estate Assessments is requesting the amendment to the ordinance to eliminate the requirement for anyone appealing their assessment to appear in-person before the assessor. The department feels that requiring everyone to appear before the assessor may be a deterrent for them to file an appeal. Prep • Real Estate Assessor Attachments: 0 Yes No e��$� �CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARDO SUPERVISORS Page , of AGENDA The attached ordinance reflects the amendment to County Code § 9-14 that is requested by the real estate assessor. Staff recommends that a public hearing be scheduled for October 26, 2016. 4L9ff4fjjL •� BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County: (1) That Section 9-14 of the Code of the County of Chester geld, 1997, as amended, is amended and re-enacted to read as follows: [MM 0 &'1 Ik11 Il DI�T.X`1 �f•Xy►T 1 o1►`II 1G Sec. 9-14. - Real estate assessments and reassessments—Procedures. The assessor and the board of equalization shall follow the following procedures in the assessment of real estate in the county: (a) The real estate assessment office shall notify each affected taxpayer in writing on or before February 1 of any year in which the assessor makes a new or changed assessment. The notice shall be mailed to the last known address shown on the county land books. (b) Any affected taxpayer, or person with a substantial legal or equitable interest in the property involved, or any duly appointed representative of such persons, or any authorized representative of the county board of supervisors may file appear before the assessor to present objections to the assessment by filing a written protest on forms provided by the assessor. itten protest a -a appear be f „v the assesse. nd pr-ese.1341 objeetio s to the assess,,.,or+ The objections shall be filed with the office of real estate assessments by March 15 of the year in which the assessor makes a new or changed assessment. The postmark date shall be considered the date of receipt of the objections. An executed and properly notarized letter from the property owner designating an appointed representative for the taxpayer shall be presumed to be a valid designation from the taxpayer, and the person whose signature is notarized shall be presumed to have the authority to designate such representative on behalf of the taxpayer. (c) Such person may also, after filing a written protest with and appearing before the assessor as provided in subsection (b), file a request for relief of the assessment with the board of equalization no later than April 15 of the year in which the assessor makes a new or changed assessment. The request shall be made on forms prescribed by the board of equalization and made available through the office of real estate assessments. The postmark date shall be considered the date of receipt of the request. The board of equalization of real estate assessments shall provide all those requesting relief an opportunity to be heard in person, with witnesses, and by counsel, but may also allow submissions of memoranda verified under oath. 31:97154.1 (2) That this ordinance shall become effective immediately upon adoption. 31:97154.1 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 1 of AGENDA Meeting.. Set Public Hearing to Consider an Ordinance Providing for Approval for Serving Alcoholic Beverages at After -Hours Events at County Libraries by the County Administrator Instead of the Board of Supervisors The Board is requested to set a public hearing consider the attached ordinance which provides alcoholic beverages at after-hours events at count Administrator instead of the Board of Supervisors. for October 26, 2016, to for approval for serving .y libraries by the County The County Code prohibits the serving or consumption of alcoholic beverages on County property, except at certain locations, such as Henricus, Eppington, Magnolia Grange, and Castlewood where wedding receptions and similar events are held. In 2014, at the request of the Friends of the Library, the Board amended the Code to permit alcoholic beverages to be served at County libraries with approval of the Board. Since that time, the Board has approved four such events. These events have been held at times when the libraries are closed to the public and are typically fund-raising events or recognition ceremonies for major donors. Attachments: 0 Yes E] No Title: County Attorney 0505:97256.1(97103.1) CAESTERFIs OF • Page 2 o 4GEVD& The events that have been conducted at the libraries have all been successful. They have assisted the libraries with their fund raising activities and with increasing the membership and improving the effectiveness of the Friends of the Library. Accordingly, staff believes that it is appropriate to change the county's ordinance to authorize the County Administrator to approve events at libraries where alcoholic beverages are served, rather than the Board. This will permit a more streamlined approval process and remove unnecessary items from the Board's meeting agendas. The attached ordinance authorizes the County Administrator to approve such events so long as they occur during hours when libraries are closed to the public. It also requires approval to be requested at least 30 days before the event, although the County Administrator can waive the 30 -day requirement for good cause and if he determines that there is sufficient time for staff to review the request. The ordinance also permits the County Administrator to impose conditions upon approval of the event when necessary to ensure the health, safety, and welfare of the public and attendees of any such event. 0505:97256.1(97103.1) v �l 4 AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE CODE OF THE COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD, 1997, AS AMENDED, BY AMENDING AND RE-ENACTING 14-23 RELATING TO CONSUMING ALCOHOLIC• .GES IN COUNTY PARKS,OR D OTHER COUNTY PROPERTY BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County: (1) That Section 14-23 of the Code of the County of Chestedeld, 1997, as amended, is amended and re-enacted to read as follows: Drinking alcoholicbeverages, or tendering same to another,county *; at other county (a) No person shall possess opened alcoholic beverage containers or drink an alcoholic beverage or tender a drink of an alcoholic beverage to another in a county park or on county property provided, however, that alcoholic beverages may be served and consumed at an event held at the following locations: Mid - Lothian Mines, Henricus, Eppington, Castlewood, Magnolia Grange, and at the senior center at Huguenot Park, and at the county government complex at specific locations approved and as conditioned by the board of supervisors and o , e as approved ee t n a a,�, +.. �, a� up�sofr ai— after obtaining a valid banquet license issued by the state department of alcohol beverage control and agreeing to comply with the terms of a special permit issued by the county administrator. The county department of parks and recreation shall promulgate regulations for the issuance of permits authorized by this section. If approved by the County Administrator or his designee, alcoholic beverages may be served and consumed at County libraries for events conducted by or in conjunction with the Friends of the Library, provided that no such event shall be approved unless it is to be conducted during hours when the library is closed to the public. In no case shall such an event take place unless a request for approval is made to the County Administrator at least thirty (30) days prior to the date for the proposed fund raising event. The County Administrator mu waive the 30-darequirement upon a showing of good cause and if he determines that there is sufficient time for staff to review the request and recommend appropriate action. The County Administrator or his designee may impose conditions on the granting; of such approval in order to ensure the health, safety, and welfare of the public and the attendees of any such event. Any such approval by the County Administrator shall be automatically revoked if any condition so imposed is not met. 0505:97103.1 1 (bc) No person shall possess opened alcoholic beverage containers on any county property used for a school or on any street, road, or highway located in the county. (ed) Violation of this section shall constitute a class 4 misdemeanor. (2) That this ordinance shall become effective immediately upon adoption. 0505:97103.1 2 ' M! AGENDA gn64P Meefing Date: September 28, 2016 Item t1umber: 8.C.4.c. Set Date for Public Hearing to Consider Proposed Code Amendments Relative to Bicycle Facilities (Bicycle, Pedestrian and Shared Use Paths), Buffers in Common Areas and Corner Side Yard Setbacks and Proposed Eminent Domain Policy (15PJ0115) County Administrator Board Action Requested: Set October 26, 2016 for public hearing on proposed Code Amendments relative to Bicycle Facilities (Bicycle, Pedestrian and Shared Use Paths), Buffers in Common Areas and Corner Side Yard Setbacks and proposed Eminent Domain Policy (15PJ0115). R�m• • •.`i On August 16, 2016, the Planning Commission recommended approval as follows: Proposed Code Amendments Relating Common Areas and Corner Side Yard Setbacks Ayes: Sloan, Freye and Jones Nays: Wallin and Jackson Ayes: Sloan, Freye, Jackson and Jones Nays: Wallin Prep.-r:Turner Attachments: 0 Yes 17 No 91 ffZT4 • T a' r CHESTERFIELD COUNT BOARD •SUPERVISOR AGENDA Details are provided in the attached: • Background Paper -Bikeways and Trails, Buffers in Common Areas and Corner Side Yard Setbacks • Background Paper -Proposed Eminent Domain Policy • Attachment A -Clean Proposed Ordinance • Attachment B-Blackline Proposed Ordinance • Attachment C -Public Comments And Staff Responses Policy on Amendments and : and CORNER SIDE YARD SETBAUS CORNER SIDE YARD SETBACKS The zoning ordinance is one ofmany tools used to implement the comprehensive plan. The Bikeways and Trails Chapter, an amendment to Moving Forward... The Comprehensive Plon/or Chesterfield County, was recently adopted by the Board of Supervisors. The chapter recommends several implementation steps, one of which is to require bikeways shown on the Bikeways and Trails Plan to be constructed in conjunction with new development. In addition, the plan suggests that incentives be offered such as buffer and setback relief in return for provision of bikeways. The term "bikeway" refers to improvements specifically designed and designated to accommodate bicycle travel whether within e road, shared use path, trail, or other approved facility. A bikeway may also include, or be a part of, facilities which serve pedestrians orother modes ofnon- motorized transportation. During review of the possible amendments related to bikeways, staff identified an opportunity to incorporate an additional amendment not directly related to bikeways to encourage required buffers along roads within lot subdivisions to be located within common areas versus individual lots. In addition, unrelated to bikeways, the amendments provide a clarification for setbacks for corner side yard within Residential and Agricultural districts. On August 16, 2016, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on the proposed amendments. On a vote of 3-2, the Commission recommended approval of the proposals subject to limiting those persons who may request a transfer of a plan review to the Planning Commission. The Board of Supervisors, following a public hearing, will make the final decision. Those interested in this project are invited to attend public hearings, and continue to monitor the website for important updates. Prior to formal public meetings and hearings, the proposed amendments were posted to the web for public comment. Based upon the comments received from the web posting, the proposed ordinance was amended to address how someone who is aggrieved by the planning department's decision relative to bikeways would be able tohave their concerns addressed inapublic forum. Comments received and staffs responses are provided in Attachment C. The amendments as recommended by the Planning Commission are attached. Attachment A is a dean version. Attachment B is a blackline version showing the necessary changes to the current ordinance. 111 �� =��`�"� FOR PROVISION OF BICYCLE FACILITIES., BUFFERS IN COMMON AREAS AND CORNER SIDE YARD SETBACKS The ordinance would require that bikeways shown on the Bikeways and Trails Plan of the Bikeways and Trails Chapter be provided in conjunction with new development requiring site plan orlot subdivision plat approval, unless the director of planning determines the provision of such facilities are not feasible based upon criteria outlined in the ordinance. A bilkeway accommodates bicycle travel, whether within a road, shared use path, trail, or other approved facility. If the bikeway facility does not accommodate pedestrians, an additional facility for pedestrians should beconsidered. As outlined in the ordinance, the provision of a bikeway is one of the matters for which an aggrieved person may request Planning Commission consideration of subdivision or site plan. 14 ��_°� �� FOR PROVISION OF BICYCLE FACILITIES,. BUFFERS IN COMMON AREAS AND CORNER SIDE YARD SETBACKS For new developments, incentives would be offered in return for provision of such bikeways. The proposed ordinance suggests the following: �Non-residential Development. w Required setbacks would be reduced by allowing the additional right-of-way dedicated to accommodate a required bikeway to be included when calculating the required setback, provided that at least 1 foot of setback is provided from the additional right-of-way dedicated to accommodate the bikeway; • Required bikeways would be allowed to encroach into buffers provided measures are taken to accomplish the purpose and intent ofthe buffer requirements; and • Required numbers ufparking spaces for developments adjacent to a required bikeway may be reduced by 1 for each G bicycle storage spaces provided, with a maximum reduction of parking spaces. }* SiIDs. Allow business signs to be located within additional right-of-way dedicated toaccommodate a �Lot Subdivisions. • Allow the width of required road buffers to be reduced by the amount ofadditional right-of-way oreasement provided toaccommodate the bikeway; and • Allow a 20 percent reduction in required lot area, as shown onthe following sketch, where the lot shares a common boundary with additional ri8ht'of-vvayorland dedicated to accommodate a bikeway. For example, in an R-12 District, the required lot area would be reduced from 12,000 to 9,GOUsquare feet for lots adjacent � R-12 L.mt Comparison of Lot Area wfth Mikeway in Right+mf-Way,mrLand Dedkomted Q FOR PROVISION OF BICYCLE FACILITIES. BUFFERS IN COMMON AREAS AN1 CORNER SIDE YARD SETBACKS As noted previously, along with the proposed amendments regarding bikeways, an opportunity exists to address a somewhat related concern relative to required buffers along roads. in lot subdivisions, the current ordinance allows required buffers along roads to be on individual lots, holding individual homeowners responsible for maintenance, upkeep and replacement ofdead vegetation. Because the buffers are owned byindividuals rather than a common entity, the long term impact often results in visual inconsistency and zoning violations. To avoid these problems, the preference has always been for such buffers to be located in common open space. However, since the overall lot yield may be reduced or the development may be of insufficient size to support a homeowners' association, the development community has been reluctant to place such buffers in open space. Given the proposed reduction in lot size related to the provision of required bikeways, an opportunity for e similar reduction related to the provision of road buffers in common area exists. This incentive will encourage buffers to be located within common area thereby addressing the issues related to buffers on individual lots. Within lot subdivisions, the proposed amendment would allow a 20 percent reduction in required lot area if the lot shares aboundary common area containing arequired road buffer. Anexample ofthis allowance isshown in the following sketch. Compadson of Lot Area with Buffer ori� Lot vs. �n Common Area Property Line � 11:1311 t of 11.0, Property Line 4 CORNER SIDE YARD SETBACKS Unrelated to bikeways, the amendments correct an omission made during the last recodification of the zoning ordinance by listing all types of corner side yards and their associated setback requirements. I The zoning ordinance is one of many tools used to implement the comprehensive plan. The Bikeways and Trails Chapter, an amendment to Moving Forward... The Comprehensive Plan for Chesterfield County, was recently adopted by the Board of Supervisors. The chapter recommends several implementation steps, one of which is to adopt an ordinance to require bikeways shown on the Bikeways and Trails Plan to be constructed in conjunction with new development. During consideration of the Bikeways and Trails Chapter, concerns were expressed that the county would use eminent domain to acquire land to accommodate the recommended bikeways. In response to this concern, staff was requested to draft a policy that clearly indicates that the county will not exercise eminent domain for any such facilities located outside of Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) right-of-way. The proposed policy isattached. The proposed policy must be considered and approved by the Board of Supervisors. Because the policy relates to the pending bikeways ordinance, the Board requested the Commission take public input during their consideration of the proposed bikeways ordinance. to 1 subject to eliminating the section which stated: "The Board of Supervisors may waive or revoke this policy by majority vote." Prior to formal public meetings, the proposed policy was posted to the web for public comment. Comments received can be found in Attachment C. Those interested in this project are invited to attend public meetings and continue to monitor the website for important updates. DRAFT CHESTERFIELD COUNTY EMINENT DOMAIN ' O (BikewaysPlan) 1. Under applicable law, Chesterfield County is permitted to use the power of eminent domain to acquire private property for public use subject to the requirement to pay just compensation for the property acquired. The County's use of eminent domain must comply with the United States Constitution and the Virginia Constitution. ]Eminent domain may be used to acquire property for public purposes such as, but not limited to: (i) public roads and rights of way, (ii) public facilities such as fire stations, schools and parks, and (iii) public wastewater and water systems. Under Virginia law, each exercise of eminent domain by the County must be authorized by a vote of the Board of Supervisors after conducting a public hearing. 2. On November 18, 2015, the Board of Supervisors amended the Comprehensive Plan for the County by adding a new Chapter 14 titled Bikeways and Trails. This chapter focuses on the development of bicycle, pedestrian and shared use pathway facilities throughout the County. 3. It is the policy of the Board of Supervisors that the County will not use the power of eminent domain to acquire property (including easements) for the development of bicycle, pedestrian or shared use pathway facilities that will be located outside of right-of-way proposed or intended to be maintained by the Virginia Department of Transportation. 4. Notwithstanding the above, this policy does not apply to the acquisition of property for the development of bicycle, pedestrian or shared use pathway facilities: (i) that does not involve the exercise of eminent domain including, without limitation, the purchase of property or acquiring property through gift or dedication and/or (ii) where a person owning an interest in such property is unknown or cannot be located. (Adopted on _ 2016) 1928:95834.4 AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE CODE OF THE COUNTY OF CHESTERFIEL AS BY AMENDING AND REENACTING SECTIONS + • + • + • 19.1-239,19.1-262,19.1-263 and 19-570 • ORDINANCE RELATING # ' l M • - • • - •III II• - • • (1) That Sections 19.1-27, 9.1-30, 19.1-53, 19.1-61, 19.1-66, 19.1-71, 19.1-76, 19.1-81, 19.1-86, 19.1-92, 19.1-97, 19.1-133, 19.1-208, 19.1-209, 19.1-210, 19.1-211, 19.1-212,19.1-231, 19.1-236, 19.1-239, 19.1-262 19.1-263, 19.1-264, 19-274, 19-304, .19-306, 19-369, 19-550, and 19-570 of the Code of the County of Chesterfield.,, 1997, as amended, are amended and re-enacted' to read as follows: F. Site Plan Required Information. Plans shall be prepared in one or more sheets if necessary to facilitate review and approval. If prepared in more than one sheet, match lines shall clearly indicate where sheets join and each sheet shall contain an overall sketch plan showing the relationship of improvements on each sheet. Scale shall be 1 inch equals 100 feet or larger for all plan sheets showing buildings or building lots, and at least 1 inch equals 600 feet for all other plan sheets. In addition to other information as may be required by this chapter for applications, a site plan shall include the following information where applicable, and if applicable, existing and proposed improvements or landscaping: 000 • Roads, parking, buildings,pedestrian access and bikeways: o roads; entrances, exits, parking to include handicapped and loading spaces; number of spaces; length and width of spaces; width of drives; and pavement design detail; o sidewalks; o bikeways; o buildings locations, including distances between buildings, and 1 -Clean ,R /�� 4 , o building details including architectural elevations or renderings, number of stories, gross square feet of each floor, number of dwelling units, number of lodging rooms in hotel or motel, and height. C. Anneals and Transfers. M WE I I I ISM I Il►i ' ii I Ili :!,I 11� I I I a. Applicant. If the planning department approves or disapproves the plan and the applicant disagrees with the final decision, he may file a written appeal with the planning commission within 15 days of the date of the decision. b. Aggrieved Person. An aggrieved person may request in writing within 15 days of the date of the decision that the application be decided by the planning commission instead of the planning department. The transfer request shall explain how the development shown on the plan will adversely affect the person and is limited to the following matters: • land use transitions; • buffers and screening; • zoning approval conditions; • architectural treatment; • features affecting nearby residential areas; • access and internal circulation; • Chesapeake Bay Preservation area delineation-, • Improvement sketch processing; • drainage; • water and wastewater line location; or • features affecting public safety. In addition for the purposes of bikeways as provided in Section 19.1-208, transfer of review may be requested in accordance with this section provided that the person shall not be aggrieved solely because they would be reasonably calculated to use such bikeway. M 2 -Clean 0 ( 0 0, M1 R -C District: a. Use is located within the conservation area required by Section 1.9.1-86.; b. Maximum of 10 percent, but no less than 2 acres, of the designated conservation areas is used for community buildings and active recreation facilities (tennis courts, swimming pools, etc.) and accessory parking; c. Facilities and related parking are located and designed to minimize impacts on rural vistas, historic sites and natural resources; d. With the exception of playground areas (i.e., areas accommodating swings, jungle gyms, or similar such facilities), outdoor playfields, courts, swimming pools and similar active recreational areas are set back 100 feet from single family residential lot lines and 50 feet from roads except when the ultimate right-of-way has been expanded solely to accommodate a bikeway required by Sec. 1.9.1.-208, then the setbacks shall be measured without including the expanded right-of-way. Indoor facilities or parking are permitted within the 100 feet. Within the 100 foot setback, a 50 foot buffer, planted at a density of 2.5 times Perimeter Landscaping C, is provided along the perimeter of active recreational facilities except where adjacent to a road; e. Playground areas (i.e., areas accommodating swings, jungle gyms or similar such facilities) are set back a minimum of 40 feet from property lines. A 40 foot buffer, planted with Perimeter Landscaping C, is provided along the perimeter of the facilities except where adjacent to roads; f. Outside public address systems or speakers are not allowed; and g. Trails are set back 25 feet from property adjacent to the subdivision or single family residential lot line within the subdivision. 3 -Clean "I'll 0 "'1 b .3 In addition to the other requirements of this chapter, the conditions specified in this section shall be met in an R-88 District. A. Lot and Building Standards. Lot Standards 1. Lot area and width a. Area (square feet) 88,000 b. Width (feet) 1) Fronting on major arterial 300 2) Fronting on other road 150 2. Lot coverage (maximum %) 20 B. Road.Fronta e for lots intended for dwelling purposes (feet) 1. Family subdivision lot 1.5 2. Other lotstil a. Permanent cul-de-sac 30 b. Radius of a loop street 30 c. Other roads [41 50 C. Principal Building Setbacks (feet) 151 I. Front yard161 a. Non cul-de-sac 75 b. Permanent cul-de-sac _ 25 2. Interior side yard 40 3. Corner side yard y' a. Through lot, lot back to back with another corner lot, or lot backing to open space or common area 171 40 b. Other lot 75 4. Rear yard j a. Non through lot 50 b. Through lot 75 D. Principal Building Heights (maximum) 1. Midlothian Core and Chester Corridor East Special Design Districts Lesser of 2.5 stories or 30 feet 2. Other Lesser of 3 stories or 40 feet E. Accessory Building Requirements Subject to Section 19.1-304 4 -Clean Notes for Table 19.1-61.A. [1] For lots not having direct access onto a major arterial road, lot area may be reduced to 65,340 square feet or 43,560 square feet with use of public water and wastewater. If lot area is reduced, the maximum number of lots permitted shall be based upon the calculation as shown in Figure 19.1- 61.A. [2] Subject to the provisions of Chapter 12 relative to use of private onsite water and wastewater facilities, the area of a lot which shares a common boundary with a buffer or bikeway may be reduced in accordance with Sec. 1.9.1.-306. [3] For flag lots, road frontage may be reduced to 30 feet. [4] Frontage on the terminus of a stub street does riot meet the requirements for road frontage unless through the preliminary plat review process it is determined that extension of the stub street is not needed to serve future development. [5] Setbacks may be impacted by Buffer, Setbacks --Generally, Permitted Yard Encroachments for Principal Buildings, Floodplain, Chesapeake Bay or Upper Swift Creek Watershed regulations. [6] Minimum setbacks shall be increased where necessary to obtain the required lot width at the front building line. [7] Open space or common area shall be a minimum of 15 feet wide for the entire length of the rear property line. [8] Height limits are subject to Article IV, Division 2. 5 -Clean In addition to the other requirements of this chapter„ the conditions specified in this section shall be met in an R-40 District. A. Lot and Building Standards.�� [8] Height limits are subject to Article IV, Division 2. 6 -Clean Notes for Table 19.1-66.A. A. Lot Standards [1] Lot area requirements may be 1. Lot area and width [2] [3] [4] impacted by the availability of public utilities. Refer to Chapter 12. The area of a lot which shares a common boundary with a buffer or bikeway may be reduced in accordance with Sec. 19.1-306. For flag lots, road frontage may be reduced to 30 feet. Frontage on the terminus of a stub street does not meet the requirements for road frontage a. Area (square feet) 40,000 i b. Width (feet) 150 2. Lot coverage (maximum %) 20 B.Road Frontage for lots intended for dwelling purpose (feet) 131 1. Family subdivision lot 15 2. Other lots a. Permanent cul-de-sac 30 b. Radius of a loop street 30 c. Other roads 141 50 C.Princi al Building Setbacks (feet) 151 1. Front yard 161` a. Non cul-de-sac 60 b. Permanent cul-de-sac 25 2. Interior side and 20 unless through the preliminary plat review process it is determined that extension of the stub street is not needed to serve future 3. Garner side yard a. Lots recorded on, or after, 4/1/1974 1) Through lot, lot back to back with another corner lot, or lot backing to 30 development. open space or common area [5] Setbacks may be impacted by Buffer, Setbacks --Generally, Permitted Yard Encroachments for Principal Buildings, Floodplain, Chesapeake Bay or Upper Swift Creek Watershed regulations. 2) Other lot 55 b. Lots recorded prior to 4/1/1974 30 4. Rear yard a. Non through lot 50 b. Through lot 60 D. Principal Building Heights (maximum) 1. Midlothian Core and _ Lesser of2.5 Chester Corridor East Special Design stories or 30 feet [6] Minimum setbacks shall be Districts increased where necessary to obtain the required lot width at the Lesser of 3 stories 2. Other or 40 feet [7] front building line. Open space or common area shall E. Accessory Building .Requirements Subject to Section 1.9.1-304 be a minimum of 1.5 feet wide for the entire length of the rear 000 property line. [8] Height limits are subject to Article IV, Division 2. 6 -Clean In addition to the other requirements of this chapter, the conditions specified in this section shall be met in an R-25 District. '?MriJflr!JJ=Jr,1X Notes for Table 19.1-71.A. [8] Height limits are subject to Article IV, Division 2. 7 -Clean [1] Lot area requirements may be A. Lot Standards impacted by the availability of 1. Lot area and width public utilities. Refer to Chapter a. Area (square feet) 25,000 12. b. Width (feet) 120 2. Lot coverage (maximum %) 25 [2] The area of a lot which shares a B. Road Frontage for lots intended for dwelling purposes (feet) 131 common boundary with a buffer or 1. Family subdivision lot 15 bikeway may be reduced in 2. Other lots accordance with See. 19.1-306. a. Permanent cul-de-sac 30 b. Radius of a loop street 30 [3] For flag lots, road frontage may be c. Other roads 141 50 reduced to 30 feet. C. Principal Building Setbacks (feet) 151 [4] Frontage on the terminus of a stub 1. Front yard I"I street does not meet the a. Non cul-de-sac 50 requirements for road frontage b. Permanent cul-de-sac 25 unless through the preliminary plat 2. Interior side yard 15 review process it is determined that 3. Corner side yard MINE extension of the stub street is not a. Through lot, lot back to back with another needed to serve future development. corner lot, or lot backing to open space or 25 common area[?] [5] Setbacks may be impacted by b. Other lot 45 Buffer, Setbacks --Generally, 4. Rear yard MEM Permitted Yard Encroachments for a. Non through lot 40 Principal Buildings, Floodplain, b. Through lot 50 Chesapeake Bay or Upper Swift �D. Principal Buildi ig Heights (maximum) 181 Creek Watershed regulations. 1. Midlothian Core and Lesser of 2.5 stories Chester Corridor East Special Design or 30 feet [6] Minimum setbacks shall be Districts increased where necessary to obtain Lesser of 3 stories the required lot width at the front 2. Other or 40 feet building line. E. Accessory Building Requirements Subject to Section 19.1-304 [7] Open space or common area shall be a minimum of 15 feet wide for 000 the entire length of the rear property line. [8] Height limits are subject to Article IV, Division 2. 7 -Clean In addition to the other requirements of this chapter, the conditions specified in this section shall be met in an R-15 District. A. Lot Standards 1. Lot area and width a. Area (square feet) b. Width (feet) 2. Lot coverage (maximum %) B.Road Frontage for lots intended for 1. Family subdivision lot 2. Other lots a. Permanent cul-de-sac b. Radius of a loop street c. Other roads 141 C. Princinal Building Setbacks (fect)' 1. Front yard "' a. Non cul-de-sac b. Permanent cul-de-sac 2. Interior side yard a. Lots recorded after 12/11/1945 b. Lots recorded on, or prior to, 12/11/1945 3. Corner side yard a. Lots recorded on, or after, 4/1/1974 1) Through lot, lot back to back with another corner lot, or lot backing to open space or common area 171 2) Other lot b. Lots recorded prior to 4/1/1974 4. Rear yard a. Non through lot b. ThroWzh lot [ITLITOXMIN011M.FMIM3 01 [4] Frontage on the terminus of a stub street does not meet the 40 requirements for road frontage 25 unless through the preliminary plat review process it is 15 determined that extension of the 10 I stub street is not needed to serve future development. 20 N D.Prmcipal Building Heights (maximum) 1. Midlothian Core and Lesser of 2.5 stories Chester Corridor East Special or 30 fieet Design Districts 2. Other Lesser of 3 stories or 40 feet E. Accessory Building Requirements Subject to Section 19.1-304 [5] Setbacks may be impacted by Buffer, Setbacks --Generally, Permitted Yard Encroachments for Principal Buildings, Floodplain, Chesapeake Bay or Upper Swift Creek Watershed regulations. [6] Minimum setbacks shall be increased where necessary to obtain the required lot width at the front building line. [7] Open space or common area shall be a minimum of 15 feet wide for the entire length of the rear property line. [8] Height limits are subject to Article IV, Division 2. 8 -Clean [1] Lot area requirements may be impacted by the availability of public utilities. Refer to [2] The area of a lot which shares a common boundary with a buffer or bikeway may be reduced in accordance with See. 19.1-306. [3] For flag lots., road frontage may be reduced to 30 feet. F15,000Chapterl2. 30 31 15 30 30 50 [4] Frontage on the terminus of a stub street does not meet the 40 requirements for road frontage 25 unless through the preliminary plat review process it is 15 determined that extension of the 10 I stub street is not needed to serve future development. 20 N D.Prmcipal Building Heights (maximum) 1. Midlothian Core and Lesser of 2.5 stories Chester Corridor East Special or 30 fieet Design Districts 2. Other Lesser of 3 stories or 40 feet E. Accessory Building Requirements Subject to Section 19.1-304 [5] Setbacks may be impacted by Buffer, Setbacks --Generally, Permitted Yard Encroachments for Principal Buildings, Floodplain, Chesapeake Bay or Upper Swift Creek Watershed regulations. [6] Minimum setbacks shall be increased where necessary to obtain the required lot width at the front building line. [7] Open space or common area shall be a minimum of 15 feet wide for the entire length of the rear property line. [8] Height limits are subject to Article IV, Division 2. 8 -Clean 1 141 WINIANWAA, W In addition to the other requirements of this chapter, the conditions specified in this section shall be met in an R-12 District. ro agEL-M [8] Height limits are subject to Article IV, Division 2. 9 -Clean [1] Lot area requirements may be A. Lot Standards impacted by the availability of public utilities. Refer to Chapter 12. [2] The area of a lot which shares a 1. Lot area and width a. Area (square feet) 12,000 "1121 b. Width (feet) 90 2. Lot coverage (maximum %) 30 B. Road Frontage for lots intended for dwelling purposes feet) common boundary with a buffer or bikeway may be reduced in accordance with Sec. 19.1-306. [3] For flag lots, road frontage may be 1. Family subdivision lot 15 2. Other lots a. Permanent cul-de-sac 30 b. Radius of a loop street 30 reduced to 30 feet. [4] Frontage on the terminus of a stub street does not meet the requirements for road frontage unless through the preliminary plat review process it is determined that extension of the stub street is not needed to serve future c. Other roads [41 50 C. Principal Building Setbacks (feet) 151 1. Front and a. Non cul-de-sac 35 b. Permanent cul-de-sac 25 2. Interior side yard 10 3. Corner side yard a. Through lot, lot back to back with another corner lot, or lot backing to open space or 20 development. common area 171 [5] Setbacks may be impacted by Buffer, Setbacks --Generally, Permitted Yard Encroachments for Principal Buildings, Floodplain, Chesapeake Bay or Upper Swift Creek Watershed regulations. b. Other lot 30 4. Rear yard MER a. Non through lot 25 b. Through lot 30 D. Principal Building Heights (maximum) I'J I. Midlothian Core and Chester Corridor East Special Lesser of 2.5 stories Design Districts or 30 feet [6] Minimum setbacks shall be increased where necessary to Lesser of 3 stories or 2. Other 40 feet obtain the required lot width at the front building line. Subject to Section E. Accessory :Building Requirements 19.1-304 [7] Open space or common area shall be a minimum of 15 feet wide for 000 the entire length of the rear property line. [8] Height limits are subject to Article IV, Division 2. 9 -Clean 000 B. Lot and Building Standards. A. Lot Standards 1. Lot area and width Front and '"' a. Area (square feet) 12,0001"1" b. Width (feet) 90 2. Lot coverage (maximum %) 30 B.Road Frontage for lots intended for dwelling purposes (feet) 131 1. Family Subdivision Lot 15 2. Other Lots 3. a. Permanent cul-de-sac 30 b. Radius of a loop street 30 C. Other roads [41 50 C.Principal Building Setbacks (feet) Ifl 30 1. Front and '"' 11 a. Non cul-de-sac 35 b. Permanent cul-de-sac 25 2. Interior side yard 10 3. Corner side yard a. Through lot, lot back to back with another corner lot, or lot backing to open space or common area 171 20 b. Other lot 30 4. Rear yard a. Non through lot 25 I b. Through lot 161 F35 D. 1. Midlothian Core and Lesser of 2.5 stories Chester Corridor East Special or 30 feet Design Districts I 2. Other Lesser of 3 stories or 40 feet E. Accessory Building Requirements Subject to Section 19.1-304 [1] Lot area requirements maybe impacted by the availability of public utilities. Refer to Chapter 12. [2] The area of a lot which shares a common boundary with a buffer or bikeway may be reduced in accordance with Sec. 19.1-306. [3] For flag lots, road frontage shall be reduced to ' ) 0 feet. [4] Frontage on the terminus of a stub street does not meet the requirements for road frontage unless through the preliminary plat review process it is determined that extension of the stub street is not needed to serve future development. [5] Setbacks may be impacted by Buffer, Setbacks --Generally, Permitted Yard Encroachments for Principal Buildings, Floodplain, Chesapeake Bay or Upper Swift Creek Watershed regulations. [6] Minimum setbacks shall be increased where necessary to obtain the required lot width at the front building line. [7] Open space or common area 000 shall be a minimum of 15 feet wide for the entire length of the I rear property line. [8] Height limits are subject to Article IV, Division 2. 10 -Clean In addition to the other requirements of this chapter, the conditions specified in this section shall be met in an R-9 District. A. Lot Standards 1. Lot area and width a. Area (square feet) Front yard 161 5=16111111 9,000 b. Width (feet) a. Non cul-de-sac 75 2. Lot coverage (maximum %) b. Permanent cul-de-sac 30 B. Road Frontage for lots intended for dwelling purposes (feet) 131 1. Family subdivision lot 15 2. Other lots a. Permanent cul-de-sac 30 b. Radius of a loop street 30 c. Other roads 141 50 C-Princinal Buildini, Setbacks (feet) 151 Rear and 1. Front yard 161 a. Non cul-de-sac 30 b. Permanent cul-de-sac 25 2. Interior side yard 7.5 3. Corner side and a. Through lot, lot back to back with another corner lot, or lot backing to open space or common area [7] 15 b. Other lot 25 4. Rear and a. Non through lot 25 b. Through lot 30 D.Principal Building Heights (maximum) 1. Midlothian Core and Lesser of 2.5 stories Chester Corridor East Special or 30 feet Design Districts 2. Other Lesser of 3 stories or 40 feet E. Accessory Building Requirements Subject to Section 19.1-304 Notes for Table 19.1-92.A. [1] Lot area requirements may be impacted by the availability of public utilities. Refer to Chapter W 12. [2] The area of a lot which shares a common boundary with a buffer or bikeway may be reduced in accordance with See. 19.1-306. [3] For flag lots, road frontage may be reduced to 30 feet. [4] Frontage on the terminus of a stub street does not meet the requirements for road frontage unless through the preliminary plat review process it is determined that extension of the stub street is not needed to serve future development. [5] Setbacks may be impacted by Buffer, Setbacks --Generally, Permitted Yard Encroachments for Principal Buildings, Floodplain, Chesapeake Bay or Upper Swift Creek Watershed regulations. [6] Minimum setbacks shall be increased where necessary to obtain the required lot width at the front building line. [7] Open space or common area shall be a minimum of 15 feet wide for the entire length of the rear property line. [8] Height limits are subject to Article IV, Division 2. 11 -Clean In addition to the other requirements of this chapter, the conditions specified in this section shall be met in an R-7 District. A. Lot and Building Standards. IN 1 11 11iii i I I A. Lot Standards 1. Lot area and width for lots recorded prior to 1/1/1989 which received tentative plat approval prior to 11/13/1985 and such plat has been properly renewed. 37 a. Area (square feet) 7,000 b. Width (feet) 50 2. Lot area and width for lots where tentative approval is received on or after 11/13/1985 a. Area (square feet) 9,000 b. Width (feet) 75 3. Lot coverage (maximum %) 30 B. Road Frontage for lots intended for dwelling purposes (feet) 1. Family subdivision lot 15 2. Other lots Elm M, UNIM M go= a. Permanent cul-de-sac 30 b. Radius of a loop street 30 C. Other roads [41 50 C.Principal Building Setbacks (feet) 1. Front yard except for Ettrick Special Design District 16]171 a. Non cul-de-sac 30 b. Permanent cul-de-sac 25 47.5;;; 2. Interior side yard a. Lots recorded after 12/11/1945 b. Lots recorded on, or prior to, 12/11/1945 5 3. Corner side yard a. Lots recorded on, or after, 4/1/1974 1) Through lot, lot back to back with another corner lot, or lot backing to open space or common area 181 15 2) Other lot 25 b. Lots recorded prior to 4/1/1974 15 4. Rear yard a. Non through lot 25 b. Through lot "1 30 D.Principal Building Heights (maximum) ['01 1. Midlothian Core and Chester Corridor East Special Design Districts C"' Lesser of 2.5 stories or 30 feet Other Other Lesser of 3 stories or 40 feet j2. E. Accessory Building Requirements Subject to Section 19.1 -304 12 -Clean Notes for Table 19.1-97.A. [1] Lot area requirements may be impacted by the availability of public utilities. Refer to Chapter 12. [2] The area of a lot which shares a common boundary with a buffer or bikeway may be reduced in accordance with Sec. 19.1-306. [3] For flag lots, road frontage may be reduced to 30 feet. [4] Frontage on the terminus of a stub street does not meet the requirements for road frontage unless through the preliminary plat review process it is determined that extension of the stub street is not needed to serve future development. [5] Setbacks may be impacted by Buffer, Setbacks --Generally, Permitted Yard Encroachments for Principal Buildings, Floodplain, Chesapeake Bay or Upper Swift Creek Watershed regulations. [6] For lots located in Ettrick Special Design District: • Between contiguous developed lots, front yard setback may be reduced to the least front yard setback of any principal building on any adjacent lot; or • For other developed lots, front yard setback may be reduced to the front yard setback of any principal building on the same side of the street and within 200 feet of the lot. [7] Minimum setbacks shall be increased where necessary to obtain the required lot width at the front building line. [8] Open space or common area shall be a minimum of 15 feet wide for the entire length of the rear property line. [9] For lots located in Ettrick Special Design District: • Between contiguous developed lots, through yard setback may be reduced to the least through yard setback of any principal building on any adjacent lot; or • For other developed lots, through yard setback may be reduced to the through yard setback of any principal building on the same side of the street and within 200 feet of the lot. [1.0] Height limits are subject to Article IV, Division 2. 13 -Clean I ', . In addition to the other requirements of this chapter, the conditions specified in this section shall be met in an A District. A. Lot and Structure Standards. A. Lot Standards 1. Excluding family subdivisions, lot area and width for dwelling purposes or manufactured home a. Area (acres) 5 b. Width (feet) tip150 2. Family subdivision lots, lot area and width for dwelling purposes or manufactured home a. Area (cres) � I b. Width (feet) 1 150 3. Lots other than for residential or manufactured home use, lot area and width a. Area (acres) I b. Width (feet) 150 4. Lot coverage (maximum %) 20 B. Road Frontage for lots intended for dwelling purposes or manufactured home (feet) 121 1. Family subdivision lots 15 2. Other lots 250 C. Principal Structure Setbacks for lots having road frontage (feet)131 1. Front yard 150 141 2. Interior side yard 40 3. Corner side yard a. Through lot, lot back to back with another corner lot, or lot backing to open space or common area 151 40 b. Other lot 75 4. Rear Yard a. Non through lot 50 b. Through lot 150 D. Principal Structure Setbacks for which zoning approval has been granted to allow use for dwelling purposes or a manufactured home without public road frontage (feet) 131 1. Front yard 40 141 2. Interior side yard 15 3. Rear yard 25 E. Principal Structure Heights (maximum) 1. Structure Excluding Farm Structure a. Midlothian Core and Chester Corridor East Special Design Districts Lesser of 2.5 stories or 30 feet b. Other Special Design Districts Lesser of 3 stories or 40 feet c. Other Areas Lesser of 3 stories or 40 feet 2. Farm Structure a. Midlothian Core and Chester Corridor East Special Design Districts Lesser of 2.5 stories or 30 feet b. Other Special Design Districts excluding Ettrick Lesser of 3 stories or 40 feet c. Other Areas 50 feet F. Accessory Structure Requirements Subject to Section 19.1-304 14 -Clean Notes for Table 19.133.A.1. [1] The lot width shall be increased to the minimum required road frontage width for a depth necessary to create a 5 acre lot or in an arrangement approved by the director of planning based upon limitations imposed by the lot shape or environmental features. [2] Frontage on the terminus of a stub street does not meet the requirements for road frontage unless a determination is made that extension of the stub street is not needed to serve future development. [3] Setbacks may be impacted by Floodplain, Chesapeake Bay or Upper Swift Creek Watershed regulations. [4] Minimum setbacks shall be increased where necessary to obtain the required width at the front building line. [5] Open space or common area shall be a minimum of 15 feet wide for the entire length of the rear property line. [6] Height limits are subject to Article IV, Division 2. 15 -Clean b. Through lot 150131 D. Principal Structure Setbacks for which zoning approval has been granted to allow use for dwelling purposes or a manufactured home without public road frontage (feet)l'l 1. Front yard 40 141 2. Interior side yard 15 3. Rear yard 25 E. Principal Structure Heights (maximum)161 1. Structure Excluding Farm. Structure a. Midlothian Core and Chester Corridor East Lesser of 2.5 stories or 30 feet Special Design Districts I b. Other Special Design Districts Lesser of 3 stories or 40 feet C. Other Areas Lesser of 3 stories or 40 feet 2. Farm Structure a. Midlothian Core and Chester Corridor East Lesser of 2.5 stories or 30 feet Special Design Districts b. Other Special Design Districts excluding Lesser of 3 stories or 40 feet Ettrick C. Other Areas 50 feet F. Accessory Structure Requirements Subject to Section 19.1-304 11rdraim. Notes for Table 19.133.A.2. [1] Frontage on the terminus of a stub street does not meet the requirements for road frontage unless a determination is made that extension of the stub street is not needed to serve future development. [2] Setbacks may be impacted by Floodplain, Chesapeake Bay or Upper Swift Creek Watershed regulations. [3] For a lot created prior to 6/23/1993 which has a principal building constructed prior to 6/23/1.993 with a setback less than 150 feet, the building may be expanded, if the addition is set back at least the same distance as the existing building, but not less than 40 feet. [4] Minimum setbacks shall be increased, where necessary, to obtain the required width at the front building line. [5] Open space or common area shall be a minimum of 15 feet wide for the entire length of the rear property line. [6] Height limits are subject to Article IV, Division 2. 17 -Clean 11111111111111 ' in�110 Mg I'll A. Lot Standards 1. Lot area and width 7 a. Area (square feet) 15,000"' b. Width (feet) 100 2. Lot coverage (maximum %) 30 B. Road Frontage for lots intended for dwelling purposes or manufactured ]ionic (feet) 121131 1. Family subdivision lots 15 2. Other lots 50 C. Principal Structure Setbacks for lots having road frontage (feet) 141 1. Front yard 100 151161 2. Interior side yard a. Lot recorded on, or after, 12/11/1945 15 b. Lot recorded prior to 12/11/1945 10 3. Corner side yard a. Lot recorded on or after 4/1/1974 that is a Through lot, lot back to back with another corner lot, or lot backing to open space or common area [71 20 b. Lot recorded on or after 4/1/1974, other lot 35 c. Lot recorded prior to 4/1/1974 20 4. Rear Yard a. Non through lot 25 b. Through lot 100151 D. Principal Structure Setbacks for which zoning approval has been granted to allow use for dwelling purposes or a manufactured home without public road frontage (feet) 14, 1. Front yard 40 [61 2. Interior side yard 15 3. Rear yard 25 E. Principal Structure Heights (maximum)181 1. Structure Excluding Farm Structure a. Midlothian Core and Chester Corridor East Special Design Districts Lesser of 2.5 stories or 30 feet b. Other Special Design Districts Lesser of 3 stories or 40 feet c. Other Areas Lesser of 3 stories or 40 feet 2. Farm Structure a. Midlothian Core and Chester Corridor East Special Design Districts Lesser of 2.5 stories or 30 feet b. Other Special Design Districts excluding Ettrick Lesser of 3 stories or 40 feet c. Other Areas 50 feet F. Accessory Structure Requirements Subject to Section 19.1-304 18 -Clean (), () C dr3 Notes for Table 19.133.A.3. [1] Lot area requirements may be impacted by the availability of public utilities. Refer to Chapter 12. [2] Frontage on the terminus of a stub street does not meet the requirements for road frontage unless a. determination is made that extension of the stub street is not needed to serve future development. [3] Lots recorded without road frontage prior to 4/28/1976 are not subject to road frontage requirements. Such lots may be used for dwelling purposes or manufactured home purposes with zoning approval. [4] Setbacks may be impacted by Floodplain, Chesapeake Bay or Upper Swift Creek Watershed regulations. [5] For a lot created prior to 5/26/1988 which has a principal building constructed prior to 5/26/1988 with a setback less than 1.00 feet, the building may be expanded, if the addition is set back at least the same distance as the existing building, but not less than 40 feet. [6] Minimum setbacks shall be increased where necessary to obtain the required width at the front building line. [7] Open space or common area shall be a minimum of 15 feet wide for the entire length of the rear property line. [8] Height limits are subject to Article IV, Division 2. M 1.9 -Clean ' yrs -• � � For a development that requires site plan or lot subdivision plat approval, bikeways shall be provided in accordance with the Bikeways and Trails Plan of the comprehensive plan and constructed generally as outlined in the Bikeways and Trails Plan Facility Guidance Section of the Bikeways and Trails Chapter of the comprehensive plan unless the director of planning determines that construction of the facility is not feasible due to: • ��. ,,fin , • environmental constraints; • alternative locations or designs accomplish intent of the comprehensive plan; or • adverse impact on subject, or adjacent, development. The exact facility type, width, design and location shall be reviewed and approved by the planning department at the time of plan review. Bikeways shall either be located in right-of-way, on county -owned property or within a county easement. Unless otherwise approved by the transportation department, right-of-way to accommodate bikeways shall be exclusive of the right-of-way required by Sec. 19.1-209.8. If within a county easement on. R, R-TH or MH -2 property, such easement shall be located in common area, runless otherwise approved by the planning department. Prior to the recordation of any subdivision lot which abuts a right-of-way, easement, buffer or common area in which a bikeway is to be located, such bikeway shall be substantially completed, as determined by the planning department. ME B. Measurement from Roads. Except as provided in 2. below, setbacks from roads shall be measured from the ultimate right-of-way unless the existing right-of-way is wider. The ultimate right-of-way shall be the greater of that shown on the thoroughfare plan of the comprehensive plan, set of construction plans approved by the director of transportation or as may be determined by the director of transportation. Unless otherwise determined by the director of transportation, it shall be assumed that the road will be widened equally on both sides of the established centerline to the full designated right-of-way width. In R -MF, MH -1, MH -3, O, C and I Districts, and on property occupied by non-residential uses in any district, when the ultimate right-of-way is expanded solely to accommodate a bikeway required by Sec. 19.1-208., setbacks shall be measured without including the expanded right-of- way, except that the setback shall not be less than I foot from the expanded right-of-way. Landscaping or other design measures shall be provided to accomplish the intent of the required setback landscaping of the design district. Eff 20 -Clean F. Lot Subdivision Principal Building Setbacks from Buffers and Bikeways. Principal building setbacks from a buffer required by Sec. 19.1-263.13. which encroaches into or abuts a lot shall be the lesser of the required yard setback or 25 feet. On a lot adjacent to property occupied by a bikeway required by Sec. 19.1-208, a principal building shall be set back the lesser of the required yard setback or 25 feet. M Parts of principal buildings may project into required minimum yards as shown in Table 19.1- 210.A.: f/ �?W' vvs,orner /Front Interior Side Rear Side Cornice, eave, sill, leader, belt course, chimney, 3111 3111 3 31�1 canopy or similar ornamental feature Uncovered stairs or fire 4.5111 4.5111 4.5 4.5111 escape Terrace, step, or landings not higher than the 10111 10111 10 10111 entrance floor of the building Bay window or balcony occupying not more than 3111 3111 3 3111 one-third of the wall length Outside storm enclosure not more than 6 feet in 4111 4111 4 4111 width Attachments open on 3 1/2 required sides such as porch, 10 side yard for 10 0 carport, drive-in window or principal gasoline canoov 121 structure 131 Notes for Table19.1.21O.A. [1] Encroachment shall be no closer than 5 feet to an interior side lot line or 10 feet to a front or corner side lot line. [2] Side of structure is considered open if a maximum of 2 feet of the height of the side is constructed of brick, siding, lattice, louvers or other building materials. Any portion of the structure which complies with the required minimum principal structure yard setback is not required to be open. [3] Encroachment shall be no closer than 5 feet to interior side lot line. 21 -Clean �C Mi� M M M M RU 3. Access Plan. An access plan shall be drawn to scale and include the following, as deemed necessary by the director of transportation: o dimensions and distances; o traffic and pedestrian circulation system; © location and width of roads, crossovers, driveways, access aisles, entrances to parking areas, pedestrian ways, bikeways; and 0 other information as may be required. M 22 -Clean 23 -Clean F'1 11 1 IN ON Number of Spaces Required Specific Use General Use Category Y or All Areas Excluding Special Design Districts Size of Use Special Design Districts 121 [�i[41 [n] 121 PI [4) Dwelling units except as 2 per dwelling unit 2 per dwelling unit listed below Assisted living with dwelling units (for Assisted living 0.8 per dwelling unit 0.8 per dwelling unit without dwelling units see Health Care, Assisted living) Manufactured home 2 per manufactured [61 2 per manufactured 161 home home Multiple -family -Occupancy Residential Units[FI restricted to "housing for older persons" as defined by the Virginia Fair Housing 1.2 per dwelling unit 1.2 per dwelling unit Law with no residents permitted under 19 years of age 2 per dwelling unit, plus 1 2 per dwelling unit, plus 1 Townhouses for each 5 dwelling units for each 5 dwelling units to be located in common to be located in common parking areas parkin areas business frena the Home As per Sec. 19.1-235.A. As per Sec. 19.1-235.A. 1 per each 20 persons enrolled up to a Adult maximum of 6 spaces, plus one for each Day Care employee 171 4.4 per 1000 s/f of gfa['I 1. per each 20 persons enrolled up to a Child maximum of 6 spaces, plus one for each employee 171 Family day care home Asper Sec. 19.1-235.A. As per Sec. 19.1-235.A. Art, dance, martial arts, 1 per 200 s/f of gfa 1 per 200 s/f of gfa music 1 per employee, plus 1 for 1 per employee, plus 1 for Business or vocational each 6 students enrolled each 6 students enrolled (maximum students on (maximum students on site at one time) site at one time) Grades pre -kindergarten 5 plus 1 per employee 5 plus 1 per employee School through grade 9 (maximum on site at one (maximum on site at one time) time) 1 per employee plus 1 for 1 per employee plus 1 for Grades 10 and higher each 6 students enrolled each 6 students enrolled (maximum on site at one (maximum on site at one time) time) 23 -Clean F'1 24 -Clean Number of Spaces RequiredorAll Specific Use 7711112] Areas Excluding Special Design DistrictsSize of Usepecial Design Districts 1211 1141 131 lal Hotel or motel 1 per bedroom 1 per bedroom - —------------------------ + With cocktail lounge, ---------------------- Add 1 per 150 s/f of gfa --___._._-__-__- Add 1 per 150s/f of gfa restaurant or nightclub------ for such area -------- -such -area -for - Add 1 per each 3 seats of Add 1 per each 3 seats of r With meeting facility capacity for such area capacity for such area. Arena or stadium 1 for each 4 seats 1 for each 4 seats 1 for each 4 seats of 1 for each 4 seats Church or other place of worship sanctuary or main sanctuary or main worship room capacity worship room capacity Club_ or lode-------------------------- 1 per 100 s/f of gfa of 1 per 1.00 s/f of gfa of • Without fixed seats assembly area assembly area. 1 for each 4 seats of main 1. for each 4 seats of main r With fixed seats meeting area capacity meeting area capacity 1 for each 3 seats of 1 for each 3 seats of Theater, sit down capacity capacity Place of assemblynot '%/�'��/ Boa ' 6%i%�� o� , civ' f%/ "" '�' ��/ ; ; '� '%' v �'�' �'� otherwise enumerated ------------------------- Ml-, �'�'„% ��"'/"„ 1 per 1.00 s/f of gfa 1 per 100 s/f of gfa of r Without fixed seats -------------------------------------------------------- assembly area __._ ___-_ ._assembly area _--_...___._ 1 for each 4 seats of main 1 for each 4 seats of main • With fixed seats meeting area capacity meeting area capacity 1 per 500 s/f of gfa. 1 per 500 s/f of gfa- Kennel, commercial 5 spaces minimum 5 spaces minimum As required for Office As required for Office Veterinary clinic or hospital uses uses Assisted living without dwelling units (for assisted living with dwelling units see 1 for each 4 beds 1 for each 4 beds Dwelling, assisted living with dwelling units) Clinic: Medical, Dental, As required for Office As required for Office Optical uses uses Hospital 1.5 for each bed 1.5 for each bed Nursing Home 1 for each 4 beds 1 for each 4 beds 3 for each emergency 3 for each emergency service vehicle operated service vehicle operated from site from site 24 -Clean 25 -Clean Specific Use Number of Spaces Required All Areas Excluding Special Design Districts or Size of Use Special Design Districts 121 P1141 [11121 P1 10,000 s/f or less of gfa 1 per 200 s/f of gfa- 4.4 per 1000 s/f of gfa181 5 spaces minimum 1 per 200 s/f for the first 10,001 to 26,500 s/f of gfa 10,000 s/f of gfa, plus 1 4.4 per 1000 s/f of gfOi per 250 s/f in excess of 10,000 s/f of gfa 1 per 200 s/f for the first 1 per 200 s/f for the first 26,501 to 50,000 s/f of gfa 10,000 s/f of gfa, phis 1 10,000 s/f of gfa, plus 1 per 250 s/f in excess of per 250 s/f in excess of 10,000 s/f of gfa 10,000 s/f of 1la1$1 1 per 200 s/f for the first 1 per 200 s/f for the first 10,000 s/f of gfa, plus 1 10,000 s/f of gfa, plus 1 per 250 s/f for the next per 250 s/f for the next 50,001 to 75,000 s/f of gfa 40,000 s/f of gfa, plus 1 40,000 s/f of gfa, plus 1 per each additional 300 per each additional 300 s/f in excess of 50,000 s/f s/f in excess of 50,000 s/f of gfa of gfalxl 1 per 200 s/f for the first 1 per 200 s/f for the first 10,000 s/f of gfa, plus 1 10,000 s/f of gfa, phis 1 per 250 s/f for the next per 250 s/f for the next 40,000 s/f of gfa, plus 1 40,000 s/f of gfa, plus 1 75,001 s/f or more of gfa per each additional 300 per each additional 300 s/f for the next 25,000 s/f s/f for the next 25,000 s/f of gfa., plus I per each of gfa, plus 1 per each additional 400 s/f in additional 400 s/f in excess of 75,000 s/f of excess of 75,000 s/f of gfa gfa181 Repair 3 plus 3 for each service 3 plus 3 for each service bay bay 1 per 400 s/f of gfa of 1 per 400 s/f of gfa of enclosed sales, rental, enclosed sales, rental, office and parts area office and parts area Sales or rental excluding service areas, excluding service areas, plus 1 for each 2500 s/f of plus 1 for each 2500 s/f of outside display area, plus outside display area, plus 3 for each service bay 3 for each service bay 1 per 200 s/f of gfa of 4.4 per 1000 s/f of gfa enclosed building enclosed building Self-service and service excluding service areas,, excluding service areas, plus 3 for each service plus 3 for each service bay bay[S] 25 -Clean Zr� 26 -Clean Number of Spaces Required" Specific Use or All Areas Excluding Special Design Districts Size of Use Special Design Districts [21131141 fl) [21131141 4.4 per 1000 s/f of gfa 4.4 per 1000 s/f of gfa"I Appliance store I per 750 s/f of gfa 4.4 per 1000 s/f of gfa I per 400 s/f of enclosed I per 400 s/f of enclosed Building materials sales gfa area, plus I per 2000 gfa area, plus I per 2000 s/f of outside display area s/f of outside display area Furniture store I per 750 s/f of gfa 4.4 per 1000 s/f of gfa I per 200 s/f of gfa. in 4.4 per 1000 s/f of gfa in enclosed building enclosed building exclusive of greenhouse, exclusive of greenhouse, Greenhouse or plant nursery plus I per 700 s/f of gfa plus I per 700 s/f of gfa in greenhouse, plus I per in greenhouse, plus I per 700 s/f of outside 700 s/f of outside display and growing area display and growing area I per 400 s/f of enclosed I per 400 s/f of enclosed Home Center gfa area, plus I per 2000 gfa area, plus I per 2000 s/f of outside display area s/f of outside display area Retail Uses Not Otherwise I per 200 s/f of gfa 4.4 per I OOOs/f of gfal" Enumerated Vendor, outdoor 5 for each vendor 5 for each vendor I per 200 s/f of gfa 4.4 per 1000 s/f of gfiiI8I Carry -out 2 per 100 s/f of gfa 4.4 per 1000 s/f of gfaI81 Fast food or drive-in 2 per 100 s/f of gfa- 15 s ace minimum Sit down 1.5 per 1.00 s/f of gfa 26 -Clean Specific Use General Use Category or Size of Use Number of Spaces 1 for each employee (maximum on site at any one time), plus 1 per 200 s/f of gfa of front counter sales and stock area, plus 1 for each company vehicle 1 for each employee (maximum on site at any one time, plus 1 per 200 s/f of gfa of front counter sales and stock area, plus 1 for each comoanv vehicle JINU W4D 1 for each employee (maximum on site at any one time), plus 1 per 200 s/f of gfa of front counter sales and stock area, plus 1 for each company vehicle 1 for each employee (maximum on site at any one time), plus 1 per 200 s/f of gfa of front counter sales and stock area, plus 1 for each companv vehicle Office space less than 50% of the gfa and retail uses are 1 per 400 s/f of gfa 1 per 400 s/f of gfa Office space less than 50% of the gfa and there are no retail uses Office space more than 50% of the gfa and retail uses are accessory Office space more than. 50% of the gfa and there are no retail uses 1 per 750 s/f of gfa. 1 per 300 s/f of gfa. 1 per 400 s/f of gfa 1 for each employee (maximum on site at any one time) - 5 space minimum 1 per 300 s/f of gfa 1 for each employee for the first 300 employees, plus 1 per each 2 employees in excess of 300 (maximum on site at any one time) 1 per 750 s/f of gfa 1 per 300 s/f of gfa 1 per 400 s/f of gfa 1 for each employee (maximum on site at any one time) - 5 sbace minimum 1 per 300 s/f of gfa 1 for each employee for the first 300 employees, plus 1 per each 2 employees in excess of 300 (maximum on site at any one time) 27 -Clean Specific Use General Use Category or Size of Use Go-kart, bumper boats or similar use Golf course Golf driviru Golf course, miniature Sports playfields, indoor and outdoor with fixed seats Sports playfields, indoor without fixed seats Sports playfields, outdoor without fixed seats Swimming pool Tennis, racquetball, squash and handball court Volleyball court Indoor facilities not otherwise listed Number of Spaces Required 1 for each 3 karts, boats or similar use accommodated on track, water or similar facility at any one time 60 per each 9 holes 1.2 per each tee 3 for each hole for the first 18 holes, plus 2 for each hole for the second 18 holes, plus 1 for each hole in excess of 36 I for each 4 seats 45 per field 30 per field 1 per 90 s/f of swimming and wading area 4 per court 12 per court 1 per 200 s/f of gfa Special Design Districts [21 PI [41 1 for each 3 karts, boats or similar use accommodated on track, water or similar facility at any one time 60 per each 9 holes 1.2 per each tee 3 for each hole for the first 18 holes, plus 2 for each hole for the second 18 holes, plus 1 for each hole in excess of 36 1 for each 4 seats 45 per field 30 per field I per 90 s/f of swimming and wading area 4 per court 12 per court 4.4 per 1000s/f of gfal81 �8- �ealr Notes for "table 19.1-236.A. [1] In the Northern Jefferson Davis Highway Corridor, parking requirements shall be based upon the lesser of that outlined in the Table or 4.4 per 1000 s/f of gfa. [2] In the Northern Jefferson Davis Highway Corridor, Employment Center, Special Design Districts and C-1 Districts, the required number of parking spaces may be reduced by 10% if the development contains a sidewalk or other pedestrian system which connects, or will connect,, to existing or future sidewalks or pedestrian systems. [3] In the Northern Jefferson Davis Highway Corridor and Special Design Districts, parking spaces in a road may be counted toward the required number of parking spaces when more than 1/2 of the space adjoins the use. [4] Within a non-residential development adjacent to a bikeway required by Sec. 19.1-208., the number of parking spaces may be reduced by 1 for each 6 bicycle storage spaces, with a maximum reduction of 3 and provided a minimum of 5 parking spaces shall be provided. [5] For residential uses, parking spaces within a garage or an enclosed or covered space may be counted toward parking requirements. [6] In an NIH -1 District, one of the required parking spaces may be located in a common parking area within the park. [7] 1'f a drop-off or pick-up area is provided directly from vehicles to the building, stacking space shall be provided. If such an area is not provided, 5 additional parking spaces shall be installed. If care is provided for school age children, a sidewalk shall be installed from the building to the school bus stop for the facility. [8] In the Ettrick Special Design District, parking requirements for the use shall be based upon 2.2 parking spaces per 1,000 s/f of gfa. ME Where the required number of parking spaces is reduced as provided in Table 19.1-236.A., Note 4, the following standards shall be met: 1. Storage spaces which shall include bicycle racks shall be of a shape, location and design so as to be effectively usable; 2. Storage spaces shall be located as close as practicable to building entrances; and 3. Storage spaces shall either be located within: a parking area, but not on required parking spaces or so as to obstruct vehicular traffic; ® a sidewalk, but not so as to obstruct pedestrian traffic; or i another area as may be approved through plan review. � �� (k r aro. ✓�'"^ M 111 B. Permitted Uses in Buffers. Provided that the uses are consistent with the purpose and intent of buffers, uses permitted in buffers include: • landscaping and screening as permitted herein; • signs; • security fencing; • utilities which run generally perpendicular through the buffer; • pedestrian ways, • bikeways; or • similar uses as may be permitted through plan review. In subdivisions, easements or road accesses crossing a buffer shall be permitted provided they cross the buffer generally at right angles or so as to have the least impact on the buffer. M1 D. Permitted Encroachments into Buffers Adjacent to Roads in Subdivisions. The following encroachments shall be permitted, provided that, at the time of plan review for a subdivision, the necessity for the encroachment is demonstrated along with the fact that alternatives to the encroachment are not easily available. The easement encroachment shall be depicted on construction plans. M 2. At time of preliminary plat review, if it is determined, due to unique site circumstance,, that a BMP is required adjacent to a road, the BMP may encroach as determined by the director of environmental engineering, provided that: HE • in. addition to the requirements of Section 19.1-212., landscaping, berms, or decorative fences or features are provided between the lots and the road to accomplish the spirit and intent of the buffer requirement and to preclude access to the road, as determined at the time of plan review. 30 -Clean wmi 11111 11111 � 111111 ii r III! ii 111 000 3. Buffers Treatment. Table 19.1-263.A.2.a. outlines the landscaping requirements for buffers between different zoning districts. If the buffer does not contain existing vegetation or if existing vegetation is approved for removal, the requirements of either Table 19.1-263.A.2.a. or Table 19.1-263.A.2.b. may be used. Notes for Table 19.1-263.A.2.a. [1] Between different zoning districts, where a bikeway required by Sec. 19.1-208. is permitted within a buffer, the director of planning may modify buffer treatment requirements so long as the resulting improvements and design meet the purpose and intent of buffers. [2] Evergreen trees may be substituted for a maximum of 50 percent of required small deciduous trees. 31 -Clean I'd Notes for Table 19.1-263.A.2.b. [1] Between different zoning districts, where a bikeway required by Sec. 19.1-208. is permitted within a buffer, the director of planning may modify buffer treatment requirements so long as the resulting improvements and design meet the purpose and intent of buffers. [2] Evergreen trees may be substituted for a maximum of 50 percent of required small deciduous trees. 32 -Clean Buffer Widths. For a lot subdivision, as defined in Chapter 17, buffers shall be provided adjacent to roads as outlined in Table 19.1-263.B.1. Notes for Table 19.1-263.B.I. [1] Buffer requirements shall not apply to lots recorded prior to 2/28/2001. [2] Where right-of-way dedication Occurs to accommodate a bikeway required in 19.1-208., the width of the buffer shall be reduced by the width of the right-of-way necessary to accommodate the bikeway. [3] In the Upper Swift Creek Special Buffer Area shown on the zoning maps, the buffer width shall be increased to 100 feet except for lots which received preliminary plat approval prior to 10/10/2007. 000 000 B. Subdivision Review. Except for buffers required by zoning approval and when such approval did not allow modification of the requirements through plan review, the requirements for buffers in subdivisions may be modified during subdivision plan review provided that the resulting improvements and design meet the purpose and intent of buffers and, for buffers adjacent to roads, preclude access to the road. Where the buffer width is reduced to accommodate a bikeway required by 19.1-208, the required treatment within the buffer shall be likewise reduced or alternative treatment may be approved within the reduced width. For buffers adjacent to roads, modifications shall be limited to relocation of the buffer area and plantings, or alternative landscaping, as follows: 33 -Clean • reduction of the shrub requirement if it is determined that another feature, such as topography or existing mature vegetation, would limit the effectiveness of, or necessity for, shrubs; • using durable decorative walls or fences, berms, increasing landscaping, fencing to minimize land disturbance, or subdivision design; or • significant or unique topographical variation which accomplishes the spirit and intent of the buffer, and precludes access to the road. "I A. Signs Permitted in V Right -of- ay. In addition to the signs outlined in B., the following signs may be placed within the right-of-way if approved by the Virginia Department of Transportation: • signs posted by, on behalf of, or with permission of, a governmental agency or public utility; • noncommercial signs within a median strip at the entrances to residential, nonresidential, or mixed use communities; and • limited duration banners across a. road in Special Design Districts related to a. noncommercial activity within the District; and • other signs permitted by this chapter when located within a right-of-way expanded coley to accommodate a bikeway required by Sec. 19.1-208. B. Road Setbacks. Except where expressly stated, signs shall meet the following requirements: I. Road Setbacks. Except as outlined herein, setbacks shall be measured from the existing right-of-way. If a. sign is permitted to be located within an ultimate right-of-way shown on the comprehensive plan, or an existing right-of-way, the owner shall be responsible for relocating the sign to conform to the setback requirements at such time that the road is widened. Signs shall conform to the following setbacks: a. Except as outlined b., signs shall be set back as follows: • in Special Design Districts, 5 feet from the right-of-way; or • in other areas, 20 feet from the edge of the pavement or face of curb as applicable, but in no case less than I foot from the right-of-way. b. Along the following roads, signs may be located within the ultimate right-of-way shown on the comprehensive plan if the right-of-way is dedicated, free and unrestricted, to the county, and either a license agreement is obtained from the board of supervisors or a 34 -Clean t permit is obtained from VDOT, as may be applicable, provided the signs are set back 20 feet from the edge of the pavement or face of the curb, as applicable: o Route 60 between the Powhatan County line and Winterfield Road; o Route 60 between Old Buckingham Road and the Richmond corporate limits; o Route 360; o Route 10 between the Richmond corporate limits and Buckingham Street; o Route 1.0 between Jefferson Davis Highway and the Hopewell corporate limits; a Huguenot Road; o Courthouse Road between Route 60 and Route 360; o Harrowgate Road; and o Jefferson Davis Highway. 111 11, Notes for Table 19.1-304.A.3.a. [1] Eaves may encroach 3 feet into required setback. [2] Setbacks from a buffer required by Sec. 19.1-263.13. which encroach into or abuts a lot shall be 5 feet. . [3] Setbacks in MH -3 Districts are for individual pad sites. Notes for Table 19,1-304.A.3.b. [1] Eaves may encroach 3 feet into required setback. [2] Setbacks from a buffer required by Sec. 19.1-263.13. which encroach into or abuts a lot shall be 5 feet. [3] Setbacks in MH -3 districts are for individual pad sites. M WE M 35 -Clean Notes for Table 19.1-304.A.3.c. [1] Eaves may encroach 3 feet into required setback. [2] Setbacks from a buffer required by Sec. 19.1-263.13. which encroach into or abuts a lot shall be 5 feet. [3] Setbacks in MH -3 ) districts are for individual pad sites. Fbflffff. 1�� 000 ME Notes for Table 19.1-304.B.3. [1] Eaves may encroach 3 feet into required setback. [2] Windows, doors or other similar openings shall not be permitted above the lesser of I story or 10 feet [3] A privacy yard having a minimum size of 10 by 25 feet shall be maintained. [4] To ensure adequate usable open space on each lot, I wall of the accessory building shall abut an interior side property line and maintain a solid wall without windows, doors or other similar openings adjoining the interior side property line. [5] Detached accessory building 12 feet or more in height shall meet a setback of 10 feet. [6] Setbacks from a buffer required by Sec. 19.1-263.13. which encroach into or abuts a lot shall be 5 feet. [7] Detached accessory building 12 feet or more in height shall meet a setback of 12.5 feet. 36 -Clean 0 (1 In R Districts, the required lot area may be reduced by 20 percent when the lot shares a common boundary with one of the following: a bikeway required by Sec. 19.1-208. constructed in conjunction with the development of the affected lot, and right-of-way in excess of the ultimate right-of- way is dedicated free and unrestricted, to and for Chesterfield County, to accommodate the facility; a bikeway required by Sec. 19.1-208. constructed in conjunction with the development of the affected lot, and land is dedicated fee simple, to and for Chesterfield County, to accommodate the facility; or ® a buffer required by Sec. 19.1-263.13.1 and the buffer is located in common area. The length of the common boundary shall be at least the minimum lot width required for the district. Lot lines shall not be arbitrarily manipulated, as determined by the planning department, to obtain the required minimum lot width at the common boundary. In an R-88 District, the rninimum lot area for the district shall be based upon requirements of Table 19.1-6 I.A. Note 1. M 37 -Clean aj M Notes for Table 19.1-369.A. [1] Setbacks may be impacted by Setbacks -Generally, Permitted Yard Encroachments for Principal Buildings, Floodplain and Chesapeake Bay regulations. [2] At least one principal building in a project shall be set back as follows: • 75% or more of the fagade shall have a maximum setback of 15 feet,; or • if a hardscaped pedestrian area extending from that portion of the building set back greater than 15 feet to the required & foot setback line is provided, less than 75% of the fagade, but in no case less than 50% of the fagade, shall have a maximum setback of 15 feet. [3] Canopies and awnings that create pedestrian arcades shall be permitted to encroach into the required setback and shall not be subject to the limits of Section 19.1-210. [4] Parking shall be set back as follows: • no closer to the road than the rear of the building; or • if there is no building, the greater of either '1/2 the depth of the lot or no closer to the road than the rear fagade setback of the nearest building facing the road. Views of parking from roads shall either be minimized by a building, or 3 to 4 foot high decorative walls, fencing, evergreen hedges or a combination thereof, ',Hedges shall be maintained at a height of 3 to 4 feet. Walls, fencing and hedges shall be located as follows: • set back from the road at the minimum building setback; or • between the parking and any hardscaped pedestrian area located between the road and the parking area. [5] Parking shall not be located between the fagade of any building and the road. Views of parking areas from roads shall either be minimized by a building, or 3 to 4 foot high decorative walls, fencing, evergreen hedges or a combination thereof. Hedges shall be maintained at a height of 3 to 4 feet. Walls, fencing and hedges shall be located as follows: • setback from the road at the minimum building setback; or • between the parking and any hardscaped pedestrian area located between the road and the parking area. [6] Views of parking from adjacent property designated for single family residential use on the comprehensive plan shall either be minimized by a building, or 3 to 4 foot high decorative walls, fencing, evergreen hedges or a combination thereof Hedges shall be maintained at a height of 3 to 4 feet. [7] Height limits are subject to Article IV, Division 2. 38 -Clean A. Design Criteria for All Basins. In addition to the requirements of Section 19.1-212, all basins required by the director of environmental engineering as either a stormwater management facility or a Best Management Practice for water quality improvement or designed as a retention or detention facility for any new development or redevelopment of property shall conform to the following criteria: 111 RON, gg FRON, 111 Bikeway: Improvement specifically designed and designated to accommodate bicycle travel whether within a road, shared use path, trail, or other approved facility. A bikeway may include, or be a part of, facilities which also serve pedestrian or other modes of non -motorized transportation. The term bikeway includes associated safety measures such as, but not limited to, signage and road crossings, as well as provisions for maintenance of the facilities. 000 Pedestrian way: Circulation system designed to be used primarily by pedestrians. DWI Shared use path: A form of infrastructure separated from motor vehicle traffic that supports multiple modes of transportation such as bicycles, wheelchairs, pedestrians and other non -motorized forms of transportation. IM, (2) That this ordinance shall become effective immediately upon adoption. 1928:96807.2 39 -Clean 11 1' P 1!11111 - I RIT11111MR, 1, 1 : That Sections 17-24, 17-56, 17-62, and 17-71 of the Code of the County of Chesterfield, 1997, as amended, are amended and re-enacted, to read as follows: 01PITIUMMI 1430111115132 1111,30111 M 01TV T11111M. 000 M B. The validity of any action on an application, or transfer request as provided for in this section, shall not be affected by the unauthorized removal of a notice which has been duly posted in accordance with this section. Such posting shall occur for at least 21 days before the planning commission hearing or date of administrative action. No action on the applicable plat application may occur until after the notice period. 1. Subdivision Application. If the director of planning receives a transfer request from an aggrieved person within 15 days of the posting of the sign for a. plat under administrative review, the director shall refer the plat to the planning commission for review pursuant to See. 17-21B. The transfer request shall state reasons for concerns which shall be limited to conditions relating to streets, access, water, wastewater, stormwater conveyance systems, stormwater facilities, bikeways as provided in Sec. 19.1-208 or to the implementation of conditions of zoning required to be complied with and implemented at the time of plat approval. 2. Exception request. If the director of planning receives a transfer request from an aggrieved person, within 15 days of the posting of the sign for a proposed exception under administrative review, the director shall refer the exception request to the planning commission for review pursuant to Sec. 17-8. The transfer request pursuant to this subsection shall specify reasons for concern with the granting of the exception. C. A person is considered aggrieved for the purpose of requesting a transfer of review to the planning commission as provided in this section if: They are an owner, lessee or contract purchaser of property adjacent to the subject property; or 39 -Clean 0 4 � 4 2. They are an owner or lessee of property who will be adversely affected by the approval of the subdivision application or exception in an immediate and substantial manner not shared by the public generally. A person shall not be considered adversely affected for purposes of this section by any personal financial hardship anticipated as a result of business competition associated with the proposed use. M Application Type 40 -Clean .. 'O , �a following items shall be provided as specified for each plat or ®� plan type when the applicable column is marked with an 64X11. a w 000 U a a B. The fallowing shall be provided and/or depicted, as applicable 000 3. Individual lot area in square footage 131 and the square footage of each lot reduced in size based upon the provisions X X of Chapter 19.1 regarding buffers and bikeways 000 22. Street, rights-of-way, and easement information: a. Location, right of way width, state route number, and name of any existing street within or adjacent to the X X X X subdivision b. Location, right-of-way width, and name of any proposed X X X X street, bikeway and pedestrian network [sl c. Right-of-way dedication from the centerline of existing X X X street d. All existing and proposed residential collector and local X streets shall be labeled with design traffic volumes 40 -Clean .. 'O , �a rim M 10. Final plats shall indicate the existing and proposed right-of-way dedications for all streets and bikeways within or adjacent to the proposed subdivision. 000 TUIPMOUITI Uffillmom- A. All subdivisions shall comply with the conditions of zoning and Chapter 19.1 requiring dedication or reservation of land for possible acquisition for public uses including but not limited to: parks, schools, libraries, and fire stations. B. Subdivisions shall accommodate public uses as required by conditions of zoning and Chapter 19.1. Whenever a tract includes a proposed public use, it shall be suitably incorporated by the subdivider into the plat after a determination is made by the county whether such property is needed. 41 -Clean Application Type In addition to any requirements for a specific application, the following items shall be provided as specified for each plat or plan type when the applicable column is marked with an PLO 000 6 6 0 e. All arterial, collector, and limited access streets for which a design is required shall be labeled with classification, X geometric design standard, design speed, and design traffic volumes f. Proposed streets with centerline curve data and any X sidewalks, pedestrian and bikeway facilities g. Private pavement and fire access lanes X X X h. The location, width, and purpose of all existing and anticipated onsite easements, including any pedestrian, X X X bikeway and utility easements serving the subdivision 191 i. The location, width, and purpose of all existing and proposed offsite easements, including any pedestrian, X bikeway and utility easements serving the subdivision rim M 10. Final plats shall indicate the existing and proposed right-of-way dedications for all streets and bikeways within or adjacent to the proposed subdivision. 000 TUIPMOUITI Uffillmom- A. All subdivisions shall comply with the conditions of zoning and Chapter 19.1 requiring dedication or reservation of land for possible acquisition for public uses including but not limited to: parks, schools, libraries, and fire stations. B. Subdivisions shall accommodate public uses as required by conditions of zoning and Chapter 19.1. Whenever a tract includes a proposed public use, it shall be suitably incorporated by the subdivider into the plat after a determination is made by the county whether such property is needed. 41 -Clean Attachment A -Clean Proposed Ordinance C. The planning commission or director of planning, based upon conditions of zoning and Chapter 19.1 shall verify whether the land is to be: 1. Dedicated to the county by the subdivider, or 2. Made available for acquisition by the county. D. The planning commission or director of planning shall verify that the land is: 1. Required for the proposed public use, and 2. Suitable for the proposed public use. If it is determined that the land is not required, the director shall advise the subdivider of said determination and, if allowed by conditions of zoning and Chapter 19. 1, shall advise the subdivider as to the ability to rearrange lots in the proposed subdivision to incorporate the land. If it is determined that the land is not suitable for the proposed use, the planning commission or director may refuse to approve such dedication or configuration and require the rearrangement of lots in the proposed subdivision. E. After it is verified that the land is: 1. Required to be dedicated and appropriate for the proposed public use, the subdivider shall be informed of this finding, and shall proceed with the preliminary plat approval process. When the plat is recorded, such recordation shall constitute acceptance of the land for the designated public purpose. 2. Required to be made available for acquisition, and appropriate for the proposed public use, the subdivider shall be informed of this finding. The director of planning may also propose alternate areas on the subject parcel for acquisition. The director of planning and the appropriate county officer or other public entity involved in the acquisition or use of each such site shall seek a commitment to purchase such site by the board of supervisors and shall include an estimate of the time required to complete the acquisition. The planning commission or director of planning shall not approve the plat for a minimum of 30 days to allow the board of supervisors to act. a. If the board of supervisors approves the request, the subdivider shall designate on the plats that area proposed to be acquired by the board of supervisors. b. If the board of supervisors denies the request, the subdivider shall be advised to incorporate the area as otherwise permitted by this chapter on the plat. 000 (2) That this ordinance shall become effective immediately upon adoption. 1928:96743.2 42 -Clean Lt eJ T -11-11C, RWT117�-IUFTIV�WUIW, - r 'IllIVITT"T 'VF-U1�EST'EXFIELV- 1997, AS AMENDED, BY AMENDING AND REENACTING SECTIONS 19.1 -27,19.1 -30,19.1 -53,19.1-61,19.1-66,19.1-71,19.1-76,19.1-81,19.1-86,19.1-9 19.1-97,19.1-133,19.1-208,19.1-209, ]9.1-210,19.1-211,19.1-212,19.1-231,19.1-23 19.1-239, 19.1-262, 19.1-263, 19.1-264, 19-274, 19-304, 19-306, 19-369, 19-550, and 19-570 OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE RELATING TO BIKEWAYS (1) That Sections 19.1-27, 9.1-30, 19.1-53, 19.1-61, 19.1-66, 19.1-71, 19.1-76, 19.1-81, 19.1-86, 19.1-92,19.1-97,19.1-133,19.1-208,19.1-209,19.1-210,19.1-21l, 19.1-212,19.1-231,19.1-236, 19.1-239, 19.1-262, 19.1-263, 19.1-264, 19-274, 19-304, 19-306, 19-369, 19-550, and 19-570 of the Code of the County of Chesterfield, 1997, as amended, are amended and re-enacted, to read as follows: F. Site Plan Reguired Information. Plans shall be prepared in one or more sheets if necessary to facilitate review and approval. If prepared in more than one sheet, match lines shall clearly indicate where sheets join and each sheet shall contain an overall sketch plan showing the relationship of improvements on each sheet. Scale shall be I inch equals 100 feet or larger for all plan sheets showing buildings or building lots, and at least I inch equals 600 feet for all other plan sheets. In addition to other information as may be required by this chapter for applications, a site plan shall include the following information where applicable, and if applicable, existing and proposed improvements or landscaping: Roads, parking, buildings ,pedestrian access and bikeways: • roads; entrances, exits, parking to include handicapped and loading spaces; number of spaces; length and width of spaces; width of drives; and pavement design detail; • sidewalks; • bikeways; • buildings locations, including distances between buildings-, and I-Blackline 0(")GI *,' .w �'43 o building details including architectural elevations or renderings, number of stories, gross square feet of each floor, number of dwelling units, number of lodging rooms in hotel or motel, and height. M M LIMINM WD a NFM a. Applicant. If the planning department approves or disapproves the plan and the applicant disagrees with the final decision, he may file a written appeal with the planning commission within 15 days of the date of the decision. b. Aggrieved Person. An aggrieved person may request in writing within 15 days of the date of the decision that the application be decided by the planning commission instead of the planning department. The transfer request shall explain how the development shown on the plan will adversely affect the person and is limited to the following matters: • land use transitions; • buffers and screening; • zoning approval conditions; • architectural treatment; • features affecting nearby residential areas; • access and internal circulation; • Chesapeake Bay Preservation area delineation; • Improvement sketch processing; • drainage; • water and wastewater line location; or • features affecting public safety. In addition for the purposes of bikeways as provided in Section 19.1-208, transfer of review may be requested in accordance with this section provided that the person shall not be aggrieved solely because they would be reasonably calculated to use such bikeway. Ml 2-Blackline nil a. Use is located within the conservation area required by Section 19.1-86.; b. Maximum of 10 percent, but no less than 2 acres, of the designated conservation areas is used for community buildings and active recreation facilities (tennis courts, swimming pools, etc.) and accessory parking; c. Facilities and related parking are located and designed to minimize impacts on rural vistas, historic sites and natural resources; d. With the exception of playground areas (i.e., areas accommodating swings, jungle gyms, or similar such facilities), outdoor playfields, courts, swimming pools and similar active recreational areas are set back 100 feet from single family residential lot lines and 50 feet from roads except when the ultimate right-of-way has been expanded solely to accommodate a bikeway required by Sec. 19.1-208, then the setbacks shall be measured without including the expanded right-of-way. Indoor facilities or parking are permitted within the 100 feet. Within the 100 foot setback, a 50 foot buffer, planted at a density of 2.5 times Perimeter Landscaping C, is provided along the perimeter of active recreational facilities except where adjacent to a road; e. Playground areas (i.e., areas accommodating swings, jungle gyms or similar such facilities) are set back a. minimum of 40 feet from property lines. A 40 foot buffer, planted with Perimeter Landscaping C, is provided along the perimeter of the facilities except where adjacent to roads; f. Outside public address systems or speakers are not allowed; and g. Trails are set back 25 feet from property adjacent to the subdivision or single family residential lot line within the subdivision. 3-Blackline 04["N"M ',' 1, A, In addition to the other requirements of this chapter, the conditions specified in this section shall be met in an R-88 District. C A. Lot Standards 1. Lot area and width a. Area (square feet) 88,000 b. Width (feet) Front yard''" 1) Fronting on major arterial 300 2) Fronting on other road 150 2. Lot coverage (maximum %) 20 B. Road Frontage for lots intended for dwelling purposes (feet) 2. L Family subdivision lot 15 2. Other lots : Corner side yard -- a. Permanent cul-de-sac 30 b. Radius of a loop street 30 c. Other roadsL4XJ 50 C. Principal Building Setbacks (feet)''--*' 1. Front yard''" ' a. Non cul-de-sac 75 b. Permanent cul-de-sac 25 2. Interior side yard 40 3. Corner side yard -- �91��,�1��ti�1jNIMMPUM a. Through lot lot back to back with another corner lot or lot 7-540 backing to open space or common area 171^' with th eef*eF44 b. , aek to r,,,,a..,,Other lot 4975 4. Rear yard a. Non through lot 50 7!71 b. Through lot 75 D. Principal Building Heights (maximum)'Z'' 1. Midlothian Core and Chester Corridor East Special Design Districts Lesser of 2.5 stories or 30 feet 2. Other Lesser of 3 stories or 40 feet E. Accessory Building Requirements Subject to Section 19.1-304 4-Blackline { ' J -P Notes for Table 19.1-61.A. LILFor lots not having direct access onto a major arterial road, lot area may be reduced to 65,340 square feet or 43,560 square feet with use of public water and wastewater. If lot areasize4 is reduced, the maximum number of lots permitted shall be based upon the calculation as shown in Figure 19.1-6I.A. 1-21 Subject to the provisions of Chapter 12 relative to use of private onsite water and wastewater facilities, the area of a lot which shares a common boundary with a buffer or bikeway may be reduced in accordance with Sec. 19.1-306. [4Laj_For flag lots, road frontage may be reduced to 30 feet. {-}G4] Frontage on the terminus of a stub street does not meet the requirements for road frontage unless through the preliminary plat review process it is determined that extension of the stub street is not needed to serve future development. PJLJ_Setbacks may be impacted by Buffer, Setbacks --Generally, Permitted Yard Encroachments for Principal Buildings, Floodplain, Chesapeake Bay or Upper Swift Creek Watershed regulations. [6LMinimum setbacks shall be increased where necessary to obtain the required lot width at the front building line. .F4}[71 Open space or common area. shall be a minimum of 15 feet wide for the entire length of the rear property line. fq_LU_Height limits are subject to Article IV, Division 2. RE 5-Blackline In addition to the other requirements of this chapter, the conditions specified in this section shall be met in an R-40 District. A. Lot and Building Standards. A. Lot Standards 1. Lot area and width a. Area (square feet) b. Width (feet) 2. Lot coverage (maximum %) B. Road Frontage for lots intended for 1. Family subdivision lot 2. Other lots a. Permanent cul-de-sac b. Radius of a loop street c. Other roads fIxi C.Princioal Building Setbacks (feet) D. 1. Front yard '2" a. Non cul-de-sac b. Permanent cul-de-sac 2. Interior side yard 3. Corner side yard a. Lots recorded on, or after, 4/1/1974 1) Through lot, lot back to back with another corner lot, or lot backing to oven soace or common area 17194ok-4e, 2) b. Lots recorded prior to 4/l/1.974 4. Rear yard a. Non through lot b. Through lot 1. Midlothian Core and Chester Corridor East Special Design Districts 2. Other E. Accessory Building Requirements 60 {x}147 Frontage on the terminus of 25 a stub street does not meet the 20 requirements for road frontage unless through the preliminary plat review process it is determined that extension of the stub street is not needed to serve future -5-430 1 development. {4}f 51 may be impacted -3455 by Buffer, Setbacks --Generally, Permitted Yard Encroachments for 30 Principal Buildings, Floodplain, EM Chesapeake Bay or Upper Swift 50 _Ly ..... Creek Watershed regulations. 60 otes for Table 19.1-66.A. E EI] Lot area requirements may be impacted by the availability of public utilities. Refer to Chapter 12. E21 The area of a lot which shares a 000 150r 20 front building line. I 15 common boundary with a buffer or [7] Open space or common area shall bikeway may be reduced in 30 accordance with See. 19.1-306. 30 {x}[31 For flag lots, road frontage may be reduced to 30 feet. 50 60 {x}147 Frontage on the terminus of 25 a stub street does not meet the 20 requirements for road frontage unless through the preliminary plat review process it is determined that extension of the stub street is not needed to serve future -5-430 1 development. {4}f 51 may be impacted -3455 by Buffer, Setbacks --Generally, Permitted Yard Encroachments for 30 Principal Buildings, Floodplain, EM Chesapeake Bay or Upper Swift 50 _Ly ..... Creek Watershed regulations. 60 {5}f 81 limits are subject b ect to — Z� i Article IV, Division 2. 6-Blackline L6LMmirnum setbacks shall be increased where necessary to Lesser of 2.5 I obtain the required lot width at the stories or 30 feet front building line. I Lesser of 3 stories or 40 feet [7] Open space or common area shall Subject to Section be a minimum of 15 feet wide for theentire length of the rear 19.1-304 RMpeAyline. {5}f 81 limits are subject b ect to — Z� i Article IV, Division 2. 6-Blackline Proposed Ordinance In addition to the other requirements of this chapter, the conditions specified in this section shall be met in an R-25 District. IE N N Lot Standards 1. Lot area and width a. Area (square feet) b. Width (feet) 2. Lot coverage (maximum %) Road Fr mage for lots intended for dwelling purl 1. Family subdivision lot 2. Other lots a. Permanent cul-de-sac b. Radius of a loop street c. Other roads 191 Tincipal Building Setbacks (feet) I . Front yard "' a. Non cul-de-sac b. Permanent cul-de-sac 2. Interior side yard 3. Corner side yard a. Throu2h lot, lot back to back with another corner lot, or lot backing to open space or 17].B__I, ;A- -4h common area _anethef e&ffler_� b. ie baek anothef eeizaef4eAOther 4. Rear yard a. Non through lot b. Through lot 1. Midlothian Core and Chester Corridor East Special Design Districts 2. Other E. Accessory Building Requirements 000 Vii- KV1[1T.XV%EW" PIL4]-Frontage on the terminus of a 50 LILLot area requirements may be 25 impacted by the availability of public utilities. Refer to Chapter 25,OOOW 12. 120 extension of the stub street is not 25 [2] The area of a lot which shares a 4-525 common boundary with a buffer or 15 bikeway mqy be reduced in accordance with Sec. 19.1-306. 30 Permitted Yard Encroachments for 30 [}f31 For flag lots, road frontage 50 may be reduced to 30 feet. PIL4]-Frontage on the terminus of a 50 stub street does not meet the 25 requirements for road frontage unless through the preliminary plat 15 review process it is determined that extension of the stub street is not needed to serve future development. 4-525 f34L5J_Setbacks may be impacted by Buffer, Setbacks --Generally, 2545 Permitted Yard Encroachments for Principal Buildings, Floodplain, Chesapeake Bay or Upper Swift 40 Creek Watershed regulations. 50 jt? Minimum setbacks shall be Lesser of 2.5 stories increased where necessary to obtain or 30 feet the required lot width at the front building line. Lesser of 3 stories or 40 feet 144[71 Open space or common area Subject to Section shall be a minimum of 15 feet wide 19.1-304 _J for the entire length of the rear I property line. t_9LU_Height limits are subject to Article IV, Division 2. 7-Blackline In addition to the other requirements of this chapter, the conditions specified in this section shall be met in an R-15 District. 0 A. Lot and Building Standards. /0 -in A. Lot Standards 1. Lot area and width a. Area (square feet) b. Width (feet) 2. Lot coverage (maximum %) B.Road Frontage for lots intended for 1. Family subdivision lot 2. Other lots a. Permanent cul-de-sac b. Radius of a loop street c. Other roads liar C.PriuCmal Building Setbacks (feet) 1. Front yard a. Non cul-de-sac b. Permanent cul-de-sac 2. Interior side yard a. Lots recorded after 12/11/1945 b. Lots recorded on, or prior to, 12/11/1945 3. Corner side yard a. Lots recorded on, or after, 4/1/1974 1) Through lot, lot back to backwithanother corner lot, or lot backing to open space or common area-171Bael,� to S: de .A_A ll-ano4iff :ore 44 2) 9, ek- to baek --...-.Other lot 15,000- 1 11R}}[31 [1] Lot area requirements may be impacted by the availability of public utilities. Refer to Chapter 12. 21 The area of a lot which shares a 100 30 U11 15 corm on boundary with a buffer 30 or bikeway may be reduced in 30 accordance with Sec. 19.1-306. 50 For flag lots, road frontage may be reduced to 30 feet. Lesser of 2.5 stories ME= 40 25 15 10 -3-520 b. Lots recorded prior to 4/1/1974 20 4. Rear and a. Non through lot 25 b. Through lot 40 D.Principal BuildiLiHei hts (maximum) 1. Midlothian Core and Lesser of 2.5 stories Chester Corridor East Special or 30 feet Design Districts Lesser of 3 stories 2. Other or 40 feet E. Accessory Building Requirements Subject to Section 19.1-304 in {x}[41Frontageon the terminus of a stub street does not meet the requirements for road frontage unless through the preliminary plat review process it is determined that extension of the stub street is not needed to serve future development. {4}[5] Setbacks may be impacted by Buffer, Setbacks --Generally, Permitted Yard Encroachments for Principal Buildings, Floodplain, Chesapeake Bay or Upper Swift Creek Watershed regulations. n Minimum setbacks shall be increased where necessary to obtain the required lot width at the front building line. N-[7] Open space or common area shall be a minimum of 15 feet wide for the entire length o the rear property line. f6JL81 Height limits are subject to Article IV, Division 2. 8-Blackline I F C. ca In addition to the other requirements of this chapter, the conditions specified in this section shall be met in an R-12 District. Lot Standards 1. Lot area and width a. Area (square feet) b. Width (feet) 2. Lot coves e,Lmaximum Lc� Road Frontage for lots intended for dwelling purl 1. Family subdivision lot 2. Other lots a. Permanent cul-de-sac b. Radius of a loop street c. Other roads L431 Principal Building Setbacks (feet) 1. Front yard a. Non cul-de-sac b. Permanent cul-de-sac 2. Interior side yard 3. Corner side yard a. ThrouA lot, lot back to back with another corner lot, or lot backing to ogen space or common area [71Baek, '-- si d .- e0faef-lot U}[5"I Setbacks maybe impacted lot 2-430 by Buffer, Setbacks --Generally, 0 4L 1 Permitted Yard Encroachments fi 25 Principal Buildings, Floodplain, 30 Chesapeake Bay or Upper Swift t Creek Watershed regulations. Lesser of 2.5 stories L�LMinimum setbacks shall be or 30 feet I IMMITNEUMNWHEIM MMMEMMINAMAIM [1] Lot area requirements may be impacted by the availability of public utilities. Refer to Chapter 12. [2] The area of a lot which shares a 12,000 90 30 7feeT)IT-�] common boundary with a buffer or 15 bikeway may be reduced in SEE= accordance with See. 19.1-306, 30 P412L_For flag lots, road frontage may be reduced to 30 feet. 30 50 f34L4L_Fronta.ge on the terminus of 3 35 a stub street does not meet the 5 requirements for road frontage 25 unless through the preliminary plat 10 review process it is determined that extension of the stub street is not needed to serve future _OL 0 q-3 I development. b. Back to baek w -h anetheF eamerOther 4. Rear yard a. Non through lot b. Through lot Principal Building Heights (maximum) 1-61 1. Midlothian Core and Chester Corridor East Special Desian Districts 2. Other E. Accessory Building Requirements ME Lesser of 3 stories or 40 feet Subject to Section 19.1-304 r increased where necessary to obtain the required lot width at the front building line. NEL -Q _ Ten space or common area shall be a minimum of 15 feet wide for the entire length of the rear property line. {-6}[8] Height limits are subject to Article IV, Division 2. 9-Blackline 000 B. Lot and Building Standards. otes for Table 19.1-86.13. [1] Lot area requirements maybe A. Lot Standards impacted by the availability of public utilities. Refer to Chapter 12. [2] The area of a lot which shares a 1. Lot area and width a. Area (square feet) t4 12,000 b. Width (feet) 90 2. Lot coverage (maximum %) 10 common boundary with a buffer or B.Road Frontage for lots intended for dwelling purposes (feet) bikeway may be reduced in 1. Family Subdivision Lot . . . Lj5 accordance with See. 19.1-306. 2. Other Lots [x][31 For flag lots, road frontage shall be reduced to 30 feet. R4L4L_Frontage on the terminus of a stub street does not meet the requirements for road frontage unless through the preliminary plat review process it is a. Permanent cul-de-sac 30 b. Radius of a loop street 30 c. Other roads 191 50 C.Principal Building Setbacks (feet) L541 1. Front and P7T6T a. Non cul-de-sac 35 b. Permanent cul-de-sac 25 2. Interior side 10 yard determined that extension of the stub street is not needed to serve future development. 3. Corner side yard a. Through lot, lot back to back with another A_320 corner lot, or lot backing to open space or common area [719aekte�,ao „>;+1, +> o� {11 [5] may be impacted eefffet4e4 by Buffer, Setbacks --Generally, Permitted Yard Encroachments for Principal Buildings, Floodplain, Chesapeake Bay or Upper Swift Creek Watershed regulations. - b. Bee4-�- w4h-4notlte�_fflef-Other lot 3-20 4. Rear yard a. Non through lot 25 161 b. Through lot 35 D. Winci pal B uilding Height (maximum) `7` 1. Midlothian Core and Lesser of 2.5 stories Chester Corridor East Special or 30 feet L6LMinimum setbacks shall be Design Districts increased where necessary to obtain the required lot width at 2. Other Lesser of 3 stories or 40 feet the front building line. E. Accessory Building Requirements Subject to Section 19.1-304 {x4[71 Open space or common area shall be a minimum of 15 feet wide for the entire length o the rear property line. 000 if require441tfetigit-the subd�vlsiefl pr-eeess, When a lot i's eated alang an atter-ial er eelleetei, stfeet whieh has tie buff@F adjae@n4 te th@ street, th fequifed setback may b -e --led by 254mr. {-6}[81 Height limits are subject to Article IV, Division 2. In addition to the other requirements of this chapter, the conditions specified in this section shall be met in an R-9 District. „ r , A. Lot Standards -.Other lot Notes for Table 19.1-92.A. [1] Lot area requirements may be impacted by the availability of public utilities. Refer to Chapter 12. [22] The area of a lot which shares a 1. Lot area and width a. Area (square feet) 9,000 b. Width (feet) 75 2. Lot coverage (maximum %) 30 B. Road Frontage for lots intended for dwelling purposes (feet) - 1. Family subdivision lot 15 common boundary with a buffer 2. Other lots or bikeway be reduced in a. Permanent cul-de-sac 30 accordance with Sec. 19.1-306. b. Radius of a loop street 30 R4f3] For flag lots, road frontage may be reduced to 30 feet. {-3}[4],,,,,,,,,,,,,_Frontage on the terminus of a stub street does not meet the requirements for road frontage unless through the preliminary plat review process it is determined that extension of the stub street is not needed to serve future development. c. Other roads I'M 50 C.Principal Building Setbacks (feet) = 1. Front yard a_ a. Non cul-de-sac 30 b. Permanent cul-de-sac 25 2. Interior side yard 7.5 3. Corner side yard a. Through lot, lot back to back with another 2-515 corner lot, or lot backing to open space or common area 1'113aek to side eefni4e4 b. Baek to kaek- w.*,., , o� , -.Other lot X25 4. Rear yard a. Non through lot 25 b. Through lot 30 D.Princi al Building Ilei his (maximum) - 1. Midlothian Core and Lesser 2.5 stories Chester Corridor East Special t or 30 feet Design Districts Lesser of 3 stories or 2. Other 40 feet E. Accessory 'Building Requirements Subject to Section 19.1-304 14}f51 Setbacks may be impacted by Buffer, Setbacks --Generally, Permitted Yard Encroachments for Principal Buildings, Floodplain, Chesapeake Bay or Upper Swift Creek Watershed regulations. j61_, -Minimum setbacks shall be increased where necessary to obtain the required lot width at the front building line. 000 [71 Open space or common area shall be a minimum of 15 feet wide for the entire length of the rear property line. 1-54 U Height limits are subject to Article IV, Division 2. 11-Blackline Z ! l r In addition to the other requirements of this chapter, the conditions specified in this section shall be met in an R-7 District. A. Lot and Building Standards. A. Lot Standards 1. Lot area and width for lots recorded prior to 1/1/1989 which received tentative plat approval prior to 1.1/1.3/1985 and such plat has been properly renewed. a. Area (square feet) 7,000 b. Width (feet) 50 2. Lot area and width for lots where tentative approval is received on or after 11/13/1985 a. Area (square feet) 9,000 b. Width (feet) 75 3. Lot coverage (maximum %) 30 B.Road Frontage for lots intended for dwelling purposes (feet) - 1. Family subdivision lot 15 2. Other lots a. Permanent cul-de-sac 30 b. Radius of a loop street 30 c. Other roads UJI 50 C.Principal Building Setbacks (feet) 1=41 1. Front yard except for Ettrick �'�'o 4mge-Ge�Special_Desi,,,n. D_ist_r_ic_t_ = - a. Non cul-de-sac 30 b. Permanent cul-de-sac 2.5 2. Interior side yard a. Lots recorded after 12/11/1945 7.5 b. Lots recorded on, or prior to, 12/11/1945 5 3. Corner side yard a. Lots recorded on, or after, 4/1/1974 1) Through lot, lot back to back with another corner lot, or lot backing X51 s to open space or common area �",Baek to S:de ,,..*r *� o , 2) Back to baek ._ 4 ano, � r Other lot 4-525 b. Lots recorded prior to 4/1/1974 15 4. Rear yard a. Non through lot 25 b. Throu h lot - 30 D.Princi al 'Building Heights (maximum)- 1. Midlothian Core and Chester Corridor East Special Design Districts Lesser of 2.5 stories or 30 feet 2. Other Lesser of 3 stories or 40 feet E. Accessory Building Requirements Subject to Section 19.1-304 Notes for Table 19.1-97.A. [1] Lot area requirements may be impacted by the availability of public utilities. Refer to Chapterl2. [2] The area of a lot which shares a common boundary with a buffer or bikeway mqy be reduced in accordance with Sec. 19.1-306. P113—For flag lots, road frontage may be reduced to 30 feet. P414LFrontage on the terminus of a stub street does not meet the requirements for road frontage unless through the preliminary plat review process it is determined that extension of the stub street is not needed to serve future development. P415LSetbacks may be impacted by Buffer, Setbacks --Generally, Permitted Yard Encroachments for Principal Buildings, Floodplain, Chesapeake Bay or Upper Swift Creek Watershed regulations. P41�l`or lots located in Ettrick Special Design District: • Between contiguous developed lots, front yard setback may be reduced to the least front yard setback of any principal building on any adjacent lot; or • For other developed lots, front yard setback may be reduced to the front yard setback of any principal building on the same side of the street and within 200 feet of the lot. LZLMinimum setbacks shall be increased where necessary to obtain the required lot width at the front building line. M8] Open space or common area shall be a minimum of 15 feet wide for the entire lens h of the rear property line. P4 For lots located in Ettrick Special Design District: • Between contiguous developed lots, through yard setback may be reduced to the least through yard setback of any principal building on any adjacent lot; or • For other developed lots, through yard setback may be reduced to the through yard setback of any principal building on the same side of the street and within 200 feet of the lot. ML19J_Height limits are subject to Article IV, Division 2. M 13-Blackline C C" I , k)U"'_L 11-110 t A. Lot Standards` 1. Excluding family subdivisions, lot area and width for dwelling purposes or manufactured home a. Area (acres) 5 b. Width (feet) �'� 150 2. Family subdivision lots, lot area and width for dwelling purposes or manufactured home a. Area (acres) 1 b. Width (feet) 150 3. Lots other than for residential or manufactured home use, lot area and width a. Area (acres) 1 b. Width (feet) 1.50 4. Lot coverage (maximum %) 20 B. Road Frontage for Lots intended for dwelling purposes or manufactured home (feet)12, 1. Family subdivision lots 1.5 2. Other lots 250 C. ,Principal Structure Setbacks for lots having road frontage (feet)[-', 1. Front yard 150 141 2. Interior side yard 40 3. Corner side yard a. Through lot lot back to back with another corner lot, or lot 7540 backing to open space or common area [51Rn^' *rt '� *' „the eorffep4el b. Baek to b.,ek w„ ,r ^*> a � .Other lot 4,075 4. Rear Yard a. Non through lot b. Through lot 150 D. Principal Structure Setbacks for which zoning approval has been granted to allow use for dwelling purposes or a manufactured home without public road frontage (feet)131 1. Front yard 4141 2. Interior side yard 15 3. Rear yard 25 E. Principal Structure Heights (maximum) 101 1. Structure .Excluding '.Farm Structure a. Midlothian Core and Chester Corridor East Special. Design Districts Lesser of 2.5 stories or 30 feet b. Other Special Design Districts Lesser of 3 stories or 40 feet c. Other Areas Lesser of 3 stories or 40 feet 2. Farm Structure a. Midlothian Core and Chester Corridor East Special Design Districts Lesser of 2.5 stories or 30 feet b. Other Special Design Districts excluding Ettrick Lesser of 3 stories or 40 feet c. Other Areas 50 feet F. Accessory Structure Requirements Subject to Section 19.1-304 1.4-Blackline Notes for Table 19.133.A.1. [1] The lot width shall be increased to the minimum required road frontage width for a depth necessary to create a 5 acre lot or in an arrangement approved by the director of planning based upon limitations imposed by the lot shape or environmental features. [2] Frontage on the terminus of a stub street does not meet the requirements for road frontage unless a determination is made that extension of the stub street is not needed to serve future development. [3] Setbacks may be impacted by Floodplain, Chesapeake Bay or Upper Swift Creek Watershed regulations. L,1J_Minimum setbacks shall be increased where necessary to obtain the required width at the front building line. {4}1-51 Oven space or common area shall be a minimum of 15 feet wide for the entire length of the rear property line. f54LqL—Height limits are subject to Article IV, Division 2. A. Lot Standards 1. Lot area and width a. Area (acres) 1 b. Width (feet) 150 2. Lot coverage (maximum %) 20 B. Road Frontage for lots intended for dwelling purposes or manufactured home (feet)"] 1. Family subdivision lots 15 2. Other lots 50 C. Principal Structure Setbacks for lots having road frontage (feet)121 1. Front yard 150 [3] [41 2. Interior side yard 40 3. Corner side yard a. Through lot, lot back to back with another corner lot, or lot 7440 backing to open space or common area 151Baek to side with b. Back to back ,.,,+r, n -h— arOther lot 4075 4. Rear Yard. a. Non through lot 50 b. Through lot 15 0131 D. Principal Structure Setbacks for which zoning approval has been granted to allow use for dwelling purposes or a manufactured home without public road fronta e (feet)121 1. Front yard 40 [41 2. Interior side yard 15 3. Rear yard 25 E. Principal. Structure Heights (maximuzm')l��-41 1. Structure Excluding Farm Structure a. Midlothian Core and Chester Corridor East S ecial Design Districts Lesser of 2.5 stories or 30 feet b. Other Special Design Districts Lesser of 3 stories or 40 feet C. Other Areas Lesser of 3 stories or 40 feet 2. Farm Structure a. Midlothian Core and Chester Corridor East Special Design Districts Lesser of 2.5 stories or 30 feet b. Other Special Design Districts excluding Ettrick Lesser of 3 stories or 40 feet C. Other Areas 50 feet F. Accessory Structure Requirements Subject to Section 19.1-304 16-Blackline Notes for Table 19.133.A.2. [1] Frontage on the terminus of a stub street does not meet the requirements for road frontage unless a determination is made that extension of the stub street is not needed to serve future development. [2] Setbacks may be impacted by Floodplain, Chesapeake Bay or Upper Swift Creek Watershed regulations. [3] For a lot created prior to 6/23/1993 which has a principal building constructed prior to 6/23/1993 with a setback less than 150 feet, the building may be expanded, if the addition is set back at least the same distance as the existing building, but not less than 40 feet. 1.4j_Minimum setbacks shall be increased, where necessary, to obtain the required width at the front building line. .[44[5] Open space or common area shall be a minfirmin of 15 feet wide for the entire length of the rear property line. P4L�) Height limits are subject to Article IV, Division 2. 17-Blackline �'J A. Lot Standards 1. Lot area and width a. Area (square feet) 15,000"' b. Width (feet) 100 2. Lot coverage (maximum %) 30 B. Road Frontage for lots intended for dwelling purposes or manufactured home (feet) f21131 1. Family subdivision lots 15 2. Other lots 50 C. Principal Structure Setbacks for lots having road frontage (feet)1'1 1. Front yard 100 151161 2. Interior side yard a. Lot recorded on, or after, 12/11/1945 15 b. Lot recorded prior to 12/11/1945 10 3. Corner side yard a. Lot recorded on or after 4/1/1974 that is q TLFhrough lot lot back to back with another corner lot, or lot backing to open space or common area [71_ek !E) side with eemer-let -3-520 20 b. Lot recorded on or after 4/1/1974, baek anethemother lot 2-42' 5 c. Lot recorded prior to 4/1/1974 20 4. Rear Yard a. Non through lot 2 b. Through lot 100151 D. Principal Structure Setbacks for which zoning approval has been granted to allow use for dwelling purposes or a manufactured home without public road frontage (feet)14, 1. Front yard 40 161 2. Interior side yard 15 3. Rear yard 25 E. Principal Structure Heights (maximum)11�'l 1. Structure Excluding Farm Structure a. Midlothian Core and Chester Corridor East Special Design Districts Lesser of 2.5 stories or 30 feet b. Other Special Design Districts Lesser of 3 stories or 40 feet c. Other Areas Lesser of 3 stories or 40 feet 2. Farm Structure a. Midlothian Core and Chester Corridor East Special Design Districts Lesser of 2.5 stories or 'DO feet b. Other Special Design Districts excluding Ettrick Lesser of 3 stories or 40 feet c. Other Areas 50 feet F. Accessory Structure Requirements Subject to Section 19.1-304 9WOR11 "i -------- Proposed Ordinance Notes for Table 19.133.A.3. [1] Lot area requirements may be impacted by the availability of public utilities. Refer to Chapter 12. La]_Frontage on the terminus of a stub street does not meet the requirements for road frontage unless a determination is made that extension of the stub street is not needed to serve future development. R4LaL--Lots recorded without road frontage prior to 4/28/1976 are not subject to road frontage requirements. Such lots may be used for dwelling purposes or manufactured home purposes with zoning approval. f-34L41—Setbacks may be impacted by Floodplain, Chesapeake Bay or Upper Swift Creek Watershed regulations. H4L5J—For a lot created prior to 5/26/1988 which has a principal building constructed prior to 5/26/1988 with a setback less than 100 feet, the building may be expanded, if the addition is set back at least the same distance as the existing building, but not less than 40 feet. LO_Minimuin setbacks shall be increased where necessary to obtain the required width at the front building line. 0171 Open space or common area shall be a minimum of 15 feet wide for the entire length of the rear property line. {-6-}[8] Height limits are subject to Article IV, Division 2. M11 19-Blackline For a development that requires site plan or lot subdivision plat approval, bikeways shall be provided in accordance with the Bikeways and Trails Plan of the comprehensive plan and constructed generally as outlined in the Bikeways and Trails Plan Facility Guidance Section of the Bikeways and Trails Chapter of the comprehensive plan unless the director of planning determines that construction of the facility is not feasible due to: to�oraphy;. 0 environmental constraints,• 0 alternative locations or designs accomplish intent of the comprehensive plan; or 0 adverse impact on subject, or adjacent, development. The exact facility type, width, design and location shall be reviewed and approved by the planning department at the time of plan review. Bikeways shall either be located in right-of-way, on county -owned property or within a county easement. Unless otherwise approved by the transportation department, right-of-way to accommodate bikeways shall be exclusive of the right-of-way required by Sec. 19.1-209.13. If within a county easement on R, R.-TH or MH -2 property, such easement shall be located in common area, unless otherwise approved bv the planning department. Prior to the recordation of any subdivision lot which abuts a right-of-way, easement, buffer or common area in which a bikeway is to be located, such bikeway shall be substantially completed, as determined by the planning department. M B. Measurement from Roads. Except as provided in 2. below, setbacks from roads shall be measured from the ultimate right-of-way unless the existing right-of-way is wider. The ultirnate right-of-way shall be the greater of that shown on the t -Thoroughfare pPlan of the comprehensive plan, set of construction plans approved by the director of transportation or as may be determined by the director of transportation. Unless otherwise determined by the director of transportation, it shall be assumed that the road will be widened equally on both sides of the established centerline to the full designated right-of-way width. In R -MF, MH -I, MH -3, OC and I Districts, and on property occupied by non-residential uses in any district, when the ultimate right-of-way is expanded solely to accommodate a bikeway required by Sec. 19.1-208., setbacks shall be measured without including the expanded right-of- way, except that the setback shall not be less than I foot from the expanded right-of-way. Landscaping or other design measures shall be provided to accomplish the intent of the required setback landscaping of the design district. 20-Blackline OC - =11 F -Des-11t, cSubdivision F±2jt^±sLot Subdivision Principal Building Setbacks from f ers and Bikeways. Principal building setbacks from a buffer required by Sec. 19.1-263.13. which encroaches into mor abuts a lot shall be the lesser of the required yard setback or 25 feet. On a lot adjacent to property occupied by a bikeway required by Sec. 19.1-208, a principal building shall be set back the lesser of the required yard setback or 25 feet. 000 Parts of principal buildings may project into required minimum yards as shown in Table 19.1- 21099.A.: M Nates for Table 19.1.21W.A. [1] Encroachment shall be no closer than 5 feet to an interior side lot line or 10 feet to a front or corner side lot line. [2] Side of structure is considered open if a. maximum of feet of the height of the side is constructed of brick, siding, lattice, louvers or other building materials. Any portion of the structure which complies with the required minimum principal structure yard setback is not required to be open. [3] Encroachment shall be no closer than 5 feet to interior side lot line. 21-Blackline Front Interior Side Rear Corner Side Cornice, eave, sill, leader, belt course,, chimney, 3111 3[11 3 3111 canopy or similar ornamental feature Uncovered stairs or fire 4.5111 4.5111 4.5 4.51�1 esca e Terrace, step, or landings not higher than the 10111 10111 10 10111 entrance floor of the building Bay window or balcony occupying not more than 3111 3111 3 3111 one-third of the wall length Outside storm enclosure not more than 6 feet in 4111 4111 4 4111 width Attachments open on 3V, required sides such as porch, 10 side yard for 10 0 carport, drive-in window or principal izasoline canopv 121 structure [31 M Nates for Table 19.1.21W.A. [1] Encroachment shall be no closer than 5 feet to an interior side lot line or 10 feet to a front or corner side lot line. [2] Side of structure is considered open if a. maximum of feet of the height of the side is constructed of brick, siding, lattice, louvers or other building materials. Any portion of the structure which complies with the required minimum principal structure yard setback is not required to be open. [3] Encroachment shall be no closer than 5 feet to interior side lot line. 21-Blackline M M 000 M 3. Access Plan. An access plan shall be drawn to scale and include the following, as deemed necessary by the director of transportation: • dimensions and distances; • traffic and pedestrian circulation system; • location and width of roads, crossovers, driveways, access aisles, entrances to parking areas, pedestrian ways, bikeways; and • other information as may be required. M 22-Blackline Proposed Ordinance p1mgmal M ME 0/" 111/// /1 EI/1111 1/1 1/10 IN "WMIM ME 000 23-Blackline Number of Spaces Required Specific Use General Use Category or All Areas Excluding , j Districts Special Design Districts Size of Use Special Design Districts 12 ,.7 I f31141 13IL4 I I t1j 121 PI HI Dwelling units except as 2 per dwelling unit 2 per dwelling unit listed below Assisted living with dwelling units (for Assisted living 0.8 per dwelling unit 0.8 per dwelling unit without dwelling units see Health Care, Assisted living) Manufactured home 2 per manufactured 2 per manufactured homelb.fl homeIA41 Multiple -family -Occupancy Residential Units1541 restricted to "housing for older persons" as defined by the Virginia Fair Housing 1.2 per dwelling unit 1.2 per dwelling unit Law with no residents permitted Linder 19 years of age 2 per dwelling unit, plus 1 2 per dwelling unit, plus I Townhouses for each 5 dwelling units for each 5 dwelling units to be located in common to be located in common parking areas parking areas Business from the dome MEMMEMEM As per See. 19.1-235.A. As per Sec. 19.1-235.A. I per each 20 persons enrolled up to a Adult maximum of 6 spaces, plus one for each Day Care employee[241 - 4.4 per 1000 s/f of gfa- I per each 20 persons enrolled enrolled up to a Child maximum of 6 spaces, plus one for each employee1261 Family day care home As per Sec. 19.1-235.A. As per See. 19.1-235.A. Art, dance, martial arts, I per 200 s/f of gfa I per 200 s/f of gfa music I per employee, plus I for I per employee, plus I for Business or vocational each 6 students enrolled each 6 students enrolled (maximum students on (maximum students on site at one time) site at one time) Grades pre -kindergarten 5 plus I per employee 5 plus I per employee School through grade 9 (maximum on site at one (maximum on site at one time) time) I per employee plus I for I per employee plus I for Grades 10 and higher each 6 students enrolled each 6 students enrolled (maximum on site at one (maximum on site at one time) time) 23-Blackline =- Proposed • d 24-Blackline Number of Spaces Required Specific Use or All l Areas Excluding Special Design Districts Size of Use Special Design Districts hl [3iLl' I] l hl 131 Ili Hotel or motel - — ---------------------------------- 1 per bedroom - — — - ------------ 1 per bedroom — ------ --_With Withcocktail lounge, Add 1 per 150 s/f of gfa Add 1 per 150s/f of gfa restaurant-or—nightclub ------ for-such-area -for such area r^w Add 1 per each 3 seats of Add 1 per each 3 seats of With meeting facility capacity for such area capacity for such area Arena or stadium 1 for each 4 seats 1 for each 4 seats Church or other place of 1 for each 4 seats of 1 for each 4 seats worship sanctuary or main sanctuary or main worship room capacity worship room capacity Club or lodge —------------ �,�,/�o�;�; �� , ,,,� �,� , „%ii /,i/,,i,, ;%,/,,% / �,�� ' gig /i�� , ,i,, ,f'✓,,i,< 1 per 100 s/f of gfa of 1 per 100 s/f of gfa of Without fixed seats assembly area assembly area 1 for each 4 seats of main 1 for each 4 seats of main • With fixed seats meeting area capacity meeting area capacity Theater, sit down 1 for each 3 seats of 1 for each 3 seats of capacity capacity Place of assembly not otherwise enumerated — — -Without 1 per 100 s/f of gfa 1 per 100 s/f of gfa of d fixed seats ------------------------------------------------------ assembly areaassembly area 1 for each 4 seats of main 1 for each 4 seats of main e With fixed seats meeting area capacity meeting area capacity Kennel, commercial 1 per 500 s/f of gfa- 1 per 500 s/f of gfa- 5 spaces minimum 5 spaces minimum Veterinary clinic or hospital As required for Office As required for Office uses uses Assisted living without dwelling units (for assisted living with dwelling units see 1 for each 4 beds 1 for each 4 beds Dwelling, assisted living with dwelling units) Clinic: Medical, Dental, As required for Office As required for Office Optical uses uses Hospital 1..5 for each bed 1.5 for each bed Nursing Home 1 for each 4 beds 1 for each 4 beds 3 for each emergency 3 for each emergency service vehicle operated service vehicle operated from site from site 24-Blackline Specific Use General Use Category or . Size of Use 10,000 s/f or less of gfa 10,001 to 26,500 s/f of gfa 26,501 to 50,000 s/f of gfa 50,001 to 75,000 s/f of gfa 75,001 s/f or more of gfa Repair Sales or rental Self-service and service Number of Spaces Required If A—, i,.t ,n 1 per 200 s/f of gfa- 5 spaces minimum 1 per 200 s/f for the first 10,000 s/f of gfa, plus 1 per 250 s/f in excess of 10,000 s/f of gfa 1 per 200 s/f for the first 10,000 s/f of gfa, plus 1. per 250 s/f in excess of 10,000 s/f of gfa 1 per 200 s/f for the first 10,000 s/f of gfa, plus 1 per 250 s/f for the next 40,000 s/f of gfa, plus 1 per each additional 300 s/f in excess of 50,000 s/f of gfa 1 per 200 s/f for the first 1.0,000 s/f of gfa, plus 1 per 250 s/f for the next 40,000 s/f of gfa, plus 1. per each additional 300 s/f for the next 25,000 s/f of gfa, plus I per each additional 400 s/f in excess of 75,000 s/f of 3 plus 3 for each service 1 per 400 s/f of gfa of enclosed sales, rental, office and parts area excluding service areas, plus 1 for each 2500 s/f of outside display area, plus 3 for each service bay 1 per 200 s/f of gfa of enclosed building excluding service areas, plus 3 for each service 4.4 per 1000 s/f of gfW'l 4.4 per 1000 s/f of gfP-71 1 per 200 s/f for the first 10,000 s/f of gfa, plus 1 per 250 s/f in excess of 10,000 s/f of gfat-pl 1 per 200 s/f for the first 10,000 s/f of gfa, plus 1 per 250 s/f for the next 40,000 s/f of gfa, plus 1 per each additional 300 s/f in excess of 50,000 s/f of gfP71 I per 200 s/f for the first 1.0,000 s/f of gfa, plus I per 250 s/f for the next 40,000 s/f ofgfa, plus 1 per each additional 300 s/f for the next 25,000 s/f of gfa, plus 1 per each additional 400 s/f in excess of 75,000 s/f of gfalsaJ 3 plus 3 for each service 1 per 400 s/f of gfa of enclosed sales, rental, office and parts area excluding service areas, plus 1 for each 2500 s/f of outside display area, phis 3 for each service bay 4.4 per 1000 s/f of gfa enclosed building excluding service areas, plus 3 for each service bav[8-71 26-Blackline I :i In Number of Spaces Required Specific Use or All Areas Excluding Special Design Districts 7 Size of Use Special Design Districts 121 f3j_U4 1r1 [21131141 4.4 per 1000 s/f of gfa 4.4 per 1000 s/f of fad- Appliance store I per 750 s/f of gfa 4.4 per 1000 s/f of gfa I per 400 s/f of enclosed I per 400 s/f of enclosed Building materials sales gfa area, plus I per 2000 gfa area, plus I per 2000 s/f of outside display area s/f of outside display area Furniture store I per 750 s/f of gfa 4.4 per 1000 s/f of gfa I per 200 s/f of gfa in 4.4 per 1000 s/f of gfa in enclosed building enclosed building exclusive of greenhouse, exclusive of greenhouse, Greenhouse or plant nursery plus I per 700 s/f of gfa plus I per 700 s/f of gfa in greenhouse, plus I per in greenhouse, plus I per 700 s/f of outside 700 s/f of outside display and growing area display and growing area I per 400 s/f of enclosed I per 400 s/f of enclosed Home Center gfa area, plus I per 2000 gfa area, plus I per 2000 s/f of outside display area s/f of outside display area. Retail Uses Not Otherwise I per 200 s/f of gfa 4.4 per 1000s/f of gfal�1 Enumerated Vendor, outdoor 5 for each vendor 5 for each vendor g ;W01 ON amg� �Pg �/�' ( ug NINE/; I/ / '010 I per 200 s/f o f gfa 4.4 per 1.000 s/f of gfa- Carry-out 2 per 100 s/f of gfa 4.4 per 1.000 s/f of gfP71 Fast food or drive-in 2 per 100 s/f of gfa- 15 space minimum Sit down 1.5 per 1.00 s/f of gfa 26-Blackline Specific Use General Use Category or Size of Use 1 for each employee (maximum on siteatany one time), plus 1 per 200 s/f of gfa of front counter sales and stock area, plus 1 for each company vehicle 1 for each employee (maximum on site at any one time, plus 1 per 200 s/f of gfa of front counter sales and stock area, plus 1 for each company vehicle Office space less than 50% of the gfa and retail uses are 1 per 400 s/f of gfa 1 for each employee (maximum on site at any one time), plus 1 per 200 s/f of gfa of front counter sales and stock area, plus 1 for each company vehicle 1 for each employee (maximum on site at any onetime), plus 1 per 200 s/f of gfa of front counter sales and stock area, plus 1 for each comoanv vehicle 1 per 400 s/f of gfa Office space less than 50% of the gfa and there are no retail 1 per 750 s/f of gfa 1 per 750 s/f of gfa uses Office space more than 50% of the gfa and retail uses 1 per 300 s/f of gfa 1 per 300 s/f of gfa. are accessory Office space more than. 50% of the gfa and there are 1 per 400 s/f of gfa 1 per 400 s/f of gfa no retail uses 1 for each employee (maximum on site at any one time) - 5 space minimum 1 per 300 s/f of gfa 1 for each employee for the first 300 employees, plus 1 per each 2 employees in excess of 300 (maximum on site at any one time) 1 for each employee (naximum on site at any one time) - 5 space minimum 1 per 300 s/f of gfa. 1 for each employee for the first 300 employees, phis 1 per each 2 employees in excess of 300 (maxima n on site at any one time) 27-Blackline 28-Blackline k IiiProposed Ordinance Notes for Table 19.1-236.A. [1] In the Northern Jefferson Davis Highway Corridor,, parking requirements shall be based upon the lesser of that outlined in the Table or 4.4 per 1000 s/f of gfa. [2] In the Northern Jefferson Davis Highway Corridor, Employment Center, Special Design Districts and C-1 Districts, the required number of parking spaces may be reduced by 10% if the development contains a sidewalk or other pedestrian system which connects, or will connect, to existing or future sidewalks or pedestrian systems. L3LIn the Northern Jefferson Davis Highway Corridor and Special Design Districts, parking spaces in a road may be counted toward the required number of parking spaces when more than 1/2 of the space adjoins the use. 134r41 Within a non-residential development adjacent to a bikeway required by Sec. 19.1-208., the number of parking spaces may be reduced by 1 for each 6 bicycle storage spaces, with a maximum reduction of 3 and provided a minimum of 5 parking spaces shall be provided. {4}I51 Por residential uses, parking spaces within a garage or an enclosed or covered space may be counted toward parking requirements. N 61 In an MH -1 District, one of the required parking spaces may be located in a common parking area within the park. {-6-}f71 If a drop-off or pick-up area is provided directly from vehicles to the building, stacking space shall be provided. If such an area is not provided, 5 additional parking spaces shall be installed. If care is provided for school age children, a sidewalk shall be installed from the building to the school bus stop for the facility. RLU__In the Ettrick Special Design District, parking requirements for the use shall be based upon 2.2 parking spaces per 1,000 s/f of gfa. M Where the required number of parking spaces is reduced as provided in. Table 19.1-236.A., Note 4, the following standards shall be met: 1. Storage spaces which shall include bicycle racks shall be of a shape, location and design so as to be effectively usable; 2. Storage spaces shall be located as close as practicable to building entrances; and 3. Storage spaces shall either be located within: 0 a parki.n,_g area, but not on required parking spaces or so as to obstruct vehicular traffic; • a sidewalk, but not so as to obstruct pedestrian traffic; or XWWWO MMMIRM 29-Blackline M1 M B. Permitted Uses in Buffers. Provided that the uses are consistent with the purpose and intent of buffers, uses permitted in buffers include: o landscaping and screening as permitted herein; • signs; • security fencing; • utilities which run generally perpendicular through the buffer-, • _pedestrian wa,14ways; • bikeways; or • similar uses as may be permitted through plan review. In subdivisions, easements or road accesses crossing a buffer shall be permitted provided they cross the buffer generally at right angles or so as to have the least impact on the buffer. M D. Permitted Encroachments into Buffers Adiacent to Roads in Subdivisions. The following encroachments shall be permitted, provided that, at the time of plan review for a subdivision, the necessity for the encroachment is demonstrated along with the fact that alternatives to the encroachment are not easily available. The easement encroachment shall be depicted on construction plans. M 2. At time of preliminary plat review, if it is determined, due to unique site circumstance, that a BMP is required adjacent to a road, the BMP may encroach as determined by the director of environmental engineering, provided that: ME in addition to the requirements of Section 19.1-24-121.2., landscaping, berms, or decorative fences or features are provided between the lots and the road to accomplish the spirit and intent of the buffer requirement and to preclude access to the road, as determined at the time of plan review. 30-Blackline I �19i. 000 Buffers Treatment. Table 19.1-263.A.2.a. outlines the landscaping requirements for buffers between different zoning districts. If the buffer does not contain existing vegetation or if existing vegetation is approved for removal, the requirements of either Table 19.1-263.A.2.a. or Table 19.1-263.A.2.b. may be used. Notes for Table 19.1-263.A.2.a. III Between different zoning districts, where a bikeway required by See. 19.1-208. is permitted within a buffer, the director of planning may modify buffer treatment requirements so long as the resulting improvements and design meet the purpose and intent of buffers. P.4t2]-Evergreen trees may be substituted for a maximum of 50 percent of required small deciduous trees. 3 1 -B lackline 2 R T-121 TOW, Notes for Table 19.1-263.A.2.b. [1] Between different zoning districts, where a bikeway required by See. 19.1-208. is permitted within a buffer, the director of planning may modify buffer treatment requirements so long as the resulting improvements and design meet the purpose and intent of buffers. {x}[21 Evergreen trees may be substituted for a maximum of 50 pet -cent of required small deciduous trees. 32-Blackline Buffer Widths. For a lot subdivision, as defined in Chapter 17, buffers shall be provided adjacent to roads as outlined in Table 19.1-263.B.1. Notes for Table 19.1-263.6.I. [ 1 ] Buffer requirements shall not apply to lots recorded prior to 2/28/2001. [21 Where right-of-way dedication occurs to accommodate a bikeway required in 19.1-208., the width of the buffer shall be reduced by the width of the right-of-way necessary to accommodate the bikeway. f2}[3] fir the Upper Swift Creek Special Buffer Area shown on the zoning maps, the buffer width shall be increased to 100 feet except for lots which received preliminary plat approval prior to 10/10/2007. 000 XCI B. Subdivision Review. Except for buffers required by zoning approval and when such approval did not allow modification of the requirements through plan review, the requirements for buffers in subdivisions may be modified during subdivision plan review provided that the resulting improvements and design meet the purpose and intent of buffers and, for buffers adjacent to roads, preclude access to the road. Where the buffer width is reduced to accommodate a bikeway required by 19.1-208, the required treatment within the buffer shall be likewise reduced or alternative treatment may be approved within the reduced width. For buffers adjacent to roads, modifications shall be limited to relocation of the buffer area and plantings, or alternative landscaping, as follows: reduction of the shrub requirement if it is determined that another feature, such as topography or existing mature vegetation, would limit the effectiveness of., or necessity for, shrubs; 33-Blackline Proposed M.... using durable decorative walls or fences, berms, increasing landscaping, fencing to minimize land disturbance, or subdivision design; or significant or unique topographical variation which accomplishes the spirit and intent of the buffer, and precludes access to the road. LLf A. Sims Permitted in VDOTRight-of-Way. In addition to the signs outlined in B., the following signs may be placed within the right-of-way if approved by the Virginia Department of Transportation: signs posted by, on behalf of, or with permission of, a governmental agency or public utility; noncommercial signs within a median strip at the entrances to residential, nonresidential, or mixed use communities; and m limited duration banners across a road in Special Design Districts related to a noncommercial activity within the District;,.- and • other signs permitted by this chapter when located within a right-of-way expanded soler to accommodate a bikeway required by Sec. 19.1-208. B. Road Setbacks. Except where expressly stated, signs shall meet the following requirements: (toad Setbacks. Except as outlined herein, setbacks shall be measured from the existing right-of-way. If a sign is permitted to be located within an ultimate right-of-way shown on. the comprehensive plan, or an existing right-of-way, the owner shall be responsible for relocating the sign to conform to the setback requirements at such time that the road is widened. Signs shall conform to the following setbacks: a. Except as outlined b., signs shall be set back as follows: 0 in Special Design Districts, 5 feet from the right-of-way; or • in other areas, 20 feet from the edge of the pavement or face of curb as applicable, but in no case less than 1 foot from the right-of-way. b. Along the following roads, signs may be located within the ultimate right-of-way shown on the comprehensive plan if the right-of-way is dedicated, free and unrestricted, to tine county, and either a license agreement is obtained from the board of supervisors; or a permit is obtained from VDOT, as may be applicable:, provided the signs are set back 20 feet from the edge of the pavement or face of the curb, as applicable: 34-B lackl ine o Route 60 between the Powhatan County line and Winterfield Road; o Route 60 between Old Buckingham Road and the Richmond corporate limits; o Route 360; a Route 10 between the Richmond corporate limits and Buckingham Street; o Route 10 between Jefferson Davis Highway and the Hopewell corporate limits; o Huguenot Road; o Courthouse Road between Route 60 and Route 360; o Harrowgate Road; and © Jefferson Davis Highway. ME M Notes for Table 19.1-304.A.3.a. [1] Eaves may encroach 3 feet into required setback. [2] Setbacks from a. buffer required by See. 19.1-263.13. which encroach into or abuts a lot shall be 5 feet. For lots havinf� a bug�f: reee, [3] Setbacks in MH -3 Districts are for individual pad sites [I= Notes for Table 19.1-304.A.3.b. [1] Eaves may encroach 3 feet into required setback. [2] Setbacks from a buffer required by See. 19.1-263.13. which encroach into or abuts a lot shall be 5 feet. Fer lots ha-v;aa a buffef ree@Fded ;n aeeofdanee w4h Seet"on 19.1 263.B., t [3] Setbacks in MH -3 districts are for individual pad sites BE 35-Blackline Notes for Table 19.1-304.A.3.c. [1] Eaves may encroach 3 feet into required setback. [2] Setbacks from a buffer required by See. 19.1-263.13. which encroach into or abuts a lot shall be 5 feet. Fer lots havine a buffer Feeer-ded in aeeef4anee with Section 19.1-26I.B., the aeeesser�' [3] Setbacks in MH -3 districts are for individual pad sites. M Notes for Table 19.1-304.B.3. [1] Eaves may encroach 3 feet into required setback. [2] Windows, doors or other similar openings shall not be permitted above the lesser of I story or 10 feet [3] A privacy yard having a minimum size of 10 by 25 feet shall be maintained. [4] To ensure adequate usable open space on each lot, I wall of the accessory building shall abut an interior side property line and maintain a solid wall without windows, doors or other similar openings adjoining the interior side property line. [5] Detached accessory building 12 feet or more in height shall meet a setback, of 10 feet. [6] Setbacks from a buffer required by Sec. 19.1-263.13. which encroach into or abuts a lot shall be 5 feet. F-Ew [7] Detached accessory building 12 feet or more in height shall meet a setback of 12.5 feet. M 36-Blackline In R Districts, the required lot area may be reduced by 20 percent when the lot shares a common boundary with one of the followLng: a bikeway required by Sec. 19.1-208. constructed in conjunction with the development of the affected lot, and right-of-way in excess of the ultimate right-of- way is dedicated free and unrestricted, to and for Chesterfield County, to accommodate the facility; • a bikewav required by Sec. 19.1-208. constructed in conjunction with the development of the affected lot, and land is dedicated fee simple, to and for Chesterfield County, to accommodate the facility; or • a buffer required by Sec. 19.1-263.B.1 and the buffer is located in common area. The length of the common boundary shall be at least the minimum lot width required for the district. Lot lines shall not be arbitrarily manipulated, as determined bye planning department to obtain the required minimum lot width at the common boundary. In an R-88 District., the minimum lot area for the district shall be based upon requirements of Table 19.1-61.A. Note 1. 37-Blackline M111 Notes for Table 19.1-369.A. [1] Setbacks may be impacted by Setbacks -Generally, Permitted Yard Encroachments for Principal Buildings, Floodplain and Chesapeake Bay regulations. [2] At least one principal building in a project shall be set back as follows: • 75% or more of the fagade shall have a maximum setback of 15 feet; or • if a hardscaped pedestrian area extending from that portion of the building set back greater than 15 feet to the required 8 foot setback line is provided, less than 75% of the fagade, but in no case less than 50% of the fagade, shall have a maximum setback of 15 feet. [3] Canopies and awnings that create pedestrian arcades shall be permitted to encroach into the required setback and shall not be subject to the limits of Section 19.1-2-0-9210. [4] Parking shall be set back as follows: • no closer to the road than the rear of the building; or • if there is no building, the greater of either 1/2 the depth of the lot or no closer to the road than the rear fagade setback of the nearest building facing the road. Views of parking from roads shall either be minimized by a building, or 3 to 4 foot high decorative walls, fencing, evergreen hedges or a combination thereof. Hedges shall be maintained at a height of 3 to 4 feet. Walls, fencing and hedges shall be located as follows: • set back from the road at the minimum building setback; or • between the parking and any hardscaped pedestrian area located between the road and the parking area. [5] Parking shall not be located between the fagade of any building and the road. Views of parking areas from roads shall either be minimized by a building, or 3 to 4 foot high decorative walls, fencing, evergreen hedges or a combination thereof. Hedges shall be maintained at a height of 3 to 4 feet. Walls, fencing and hedges shall be located as follows: • setback from the road at the minimum building setback; or • between the parking and any hardscaped pedestrian area located between the road and the parking area. [6] Views of parking from adjacent property designated for single family residential use on the comprehensive plan shall either be minimized by a building, or 3 to 4 foot high. decorative walls, fencing, evergreen hedges or a combination thereof. Hedges shall be maintained at a height of 3 to 4 feet. [7] Height limits are subject to Article IV, Division 2. ELF A. Design Criteria for All Basins. In addition to the requirements of Section 19.1-2124-, all basins required by the director of environmental engineering as either a stormwater management facility or a Best Management Practice for water quality improvement or designed as a retention or detention facility for any new development or redevelopment of property shall conform to the following criteria: t1i 000 Bikeway: hnprovement specifically designed and designated to accommodate bicycle travel whether within a road, shared use path, trail, or other approved facility. A bikeway may include, or be a part of, facilities which also serve pedestrian or other modes of non -motorized transportation. The term bikeway includes associated safety measures such as, but not limited to, signage and road crossings, as well as provisions for maintenance of the facilities. 000 Pedestrian way: Circulation system designed to be used primarily by pedestrians_, busts or ^*he„ 000 Shared use path: A form of infrastructure separated from motor vehicle trafLc that supports multiple modes of transportation such as bicycles, wheelchairs, pedestrians and other non -motorized forms of transportation. (2) That this ordinance shall become effective immediately upon adolation. 1928:96806.2 39-Blackline Proposed Ordinance BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County: That Sections 17-24, 17-56, 17-62, and 17-71 of the Code of the County of'Chesterfield, 1997, as amended, are amended and re-enacted, to read as follows: Chapter 17 SUBDIVISION OF LAND 000 000 B. The validity of any action on an application, or transfer request as provided for in this section, shall not be affected by the unauthorized removal of a notice which has been duly posted in accordance with this section. Such posting shall occur for at least 21 days before the planning commission hearing or date of administrative action. No action on the applicable plat application may occur until after the notice period. L Subdivision Application. If the director of planning receives a transfer request from an aggrieved person within 15 days of the posting of the sign for a plat under administrative review, the director shall refer the plat to the planning commission for review pursuant to Sec. 17-21B. The transfer request shall state reasons for concerns which shall be limited to conditions relating to streets, access, water, wastewater, stormwater conveyance systems, wid-stormwater facilities, bikeways as provided in Sec. 19.1-208 or to the implementation of conditions of zoning required to be complied with and implemented at the time of plat approval. 2. Exception request. If the director of planning receives a transfer request from an aggrieved person, within 15 days of the posting of the sign for a proposed exception under administrative review, the director shall refer the exception request to the planning commission for review pursuant to See. 17-8. The transfer request pursuant to this subsection shall specify reasons for concern with the granting of the exception. C. A person is considered aggrieved for the purpose of requesting a transfer of review to the planning commission as provided in this section if: They are an owner., ef lessee or contract purchaser of anidja-ee�property_qdjacent to the subject property; or 39-Blackline 2. They are an owner or lessee of property who will be adversely affected by the approval of the subdivision application or exception in an immediate and substantial manner not shared by the public generally. A person shall not be considered adversely affected for purposes of this section by any personal financial hardship anticipated as a result of business competition associated with the proposed use. .; •1111111� 000 In addition to any requirements for a specific application, the Application Type following items shall be provided as specified for each plat or plan type when the applicable column is marked with an FSI QI 000 A" �y V B. The following shall be provided and/or depicted,; as applicable 000 3. Individual lot area in square footage 131 and the square footage of each lot reduced in size based upon the provisions X X of Chapter 1.9.1 regarding buffers and bikeways 000 22. Street, rights-of-way, and easement information: a. Location, right of way width, state route number, and name of any existing street within or adjacent to the X X X X subdivision b. Location, right-of-way width, and name of any proposed X X X X street, bikeway and pedestrian network 1$1 c. Right-of-way dedication from the centerline of existing X X X street d. All existing and proposed residential collector and local X streets shall be labeled with design traffic volumes 40-Blackline In addition to any requirements for a specific application, the Application Type following items shall be provided as specified for each plat or 6 plan type when the applicable column is marked with a 1~' ° 000 = a ) a 6 PLO a Pro e. All arterial, collector, and limited access streets for which a design is required shall be labeled with classification, X geometric design standard, design speed, and design traffic volumes f. Proposed streets with centerline curve data and any X sidewalks, pedestrian and bbikeway facilities g. Private pavement and fire access lanes X X X h. The location, width, and purpose of all existing and anticipated onsite easements, including any pedestrians X X X. bilcewav and utility easements serving the subdivision 191 i. The location, width, and purpose of all existing and proposed offsite easements, including any pedestrian, X bilcewav and utility easements serving the subdivision BE M 10. Final plats shall indicate the existing and proposed right-of-way dedications for all streets and bikeways within or adjacent to the proposed subdivision. M 1 � M r' = M 0 A. All subdivisions shall comply with the conditions of zoning and Chapter 19.1 requiring dedication or reservation of land for possible acquisition for public uses including but not limited to: parks, schools, libraries, and fire stations. B.fe4i-rn zap- p 4sSubdivisions shall accommodate public uses as required by conditions of zoning and Chapter 19.1. Whenever a tract includes a proposed public use, it shall be suitably incorporated by the subdivider into the plat after a determination is made by the county whether such property is needed. 41-Blackline Attachment B-Blackline Proposed Ordinance C. The planning commission or director of planning, based upon conditions of zoning ef and seke atie plan approval, Chapter 19.1 shall verify whether the land is to be: I. Dedicated to the county by the subdivider, or 2. Made available for acquisition by the county. D. The planning commission or director of planning shall verify that the land is: 1. Required for the proposed public use, and 2. Suitable for the proposed public use. If it is determined that the land is not required, the director shall advise the subdivider of said determination and, if allowed by conditions of zoning and Chapter 19.1, shall advise the subdivider as to the ability to rearrange lots in the proposed subdivision to incorporate the land. If it is determined that the land is not suitable for the proposed use, the planning commission or director may refuse to approve such dedication or configuration and require the rearrangement of lots in the proposed subdivision. E. After it is verified that the land is: 1. Required to be dedicated and appropriate for the proposed public use, the subdivider shall be informed of this finding, and shall proceed with the preliminary plat approval process. When the plat is recorded, such recordation shall constitute acceptance of the land for the designated public purpose. 2. Required to be made available for acquisition, and appropriate for the proposed public use, the subdivider shall be informed of this finding. The director of planning may also propose alternate areas on the subject parcel for acquisition. The director of planning and the appropriate county officer or other public entity involved in the acquisition or use of each such site shall seek a commitment to purchase such site by the board of supervisors and shall include an estimate of the time required to complete the acquisition. The planning commission or director of planning shall not approve the pfeliminafy plat for a minimum of 30 days to allow the board of supervisors to act. a. If the board of supervisors approves the request, the subdivider shall designate on the pi:eli,,. inaiFy plats that area proposed to be acquired by the board of supervisors. b. If the board of supervisors denies the request, the subdivider shall be advised to incorporate the area as otherwise permitted by this chapter on theme plat. 000 (2) That this ordinance shall become effective immediately upon adoption. 1928:96744.2 42-Blackline �Q a m z c,aa ` ✓ Q'iJ iter Attachment C •i'�• 1 ., . �to! HIRM, 01 AND RELATED EMINENT DOMAIN POLICE' WEB POSTING -PUBLIC COMMEN'T'S AND STAFF RESPONSES Comment Staff Response I fully support the proposed amendment. It is a great addition to the plan. I fully support the policies and procedures being proposed for the Comprehensive Bike Trails plan. I am glad to see the policy on eminent domain. That policy taken in conjunction with the Bike Trails plan shows again that Chesterfield County is capable of planning for the future while respecting both the past and the rights of individual land owners. I urge you to oppose the proposed bikeways plan and its The proposal does not require that the associated expenditures. This plan is currently unfunded and county build bikeways; rather the would only receive funding when extra funds become available. proposal would require that developers There are never any "extra" funds when government is involved. build bikeways shown on the plan as a Government spends all of the funds taken from the taxpayers' part of new development. Responsibility pockets, and in most cases, much more than is available. With the for future maintenance costs would either current state of the nation's economy and the financial conditions be borne by the Virginia Dept. of present in Chesterfield County, I cannot comprehend expending Transportation or the Chesterfield County such a significant amount of money for such a discretionary Dept. of Parks and Recreation. purpose as building a massive bikeway system. It's as if my government leaders are out searching for new ways to spend money they have not yet taken from my pocket. There are an abundance of "needs" in Chesterfield County and even more "desires." Even though I am a senior citizen who would enjoy riding my bike on long pathways, I will gladly find safe places to do so without asking you to take money from my neighbors' pockets in order to fulfill my "desire." If you want to spend money, take some money from your own funds and build a bikeway for your neighborhood. But don't take my meager Social Security funds to build a bikeway system for a small percentage of citizens that already have much more than I do. Please add my voice to those supporting the implementation of the proposed ordinances for the Bikeways and Trails Plan associated with the County's Comprehensive Plan. These improvements will enhance the quality of life for the citizens of Chesterfield and continue the march to making Chesterfield a "First Choice" community. Thank you for your consideration of this significant and forward thinking effort to promote a healthy lifestyle and reduce the use of vehicles for accessing recreation. Attachment C �� r � u COMMON AREAS D AND RELATED EMINENT DOMAIN POLICY WED POSTING -PUBLIC COMMENTS AND STAFF RESPONSES Comment Staff Res once The proposed plan makes sense to me, and I`m glad to see the process is moving forward! The comprehensive plan for pedestrian and bicycle transport in Chesterfield has been adopted. These ordinances are needed to make that plan actionable. I supported this plan and believe it is long overdue. Please move forward to make this plan a reality and Chesterfield County the forward looking county I had hoped it would be when I moved here a little over 3 years ago. I recently retired and have been asked by doctors to remain active to help combat heart issues. This plan allows my lifetime passion for cycling to be continued for many years to come, safely. Please support the ordinances that will make this plan a reality. Most taxpayers do not have the free time or money to bike or walk regularly. I agree with Items I through 4 of the proposed policy; however, I object to Generally, policies and paragraph 5 as it essentially allows the Board of Supervisors to negate said ordinances provide flexibility. policy. Under no circumstances should property owners rights be overridden, The purpose of the policy is to using eminent domain, to allow public use bike and pedestrian paths to cross emphasize that there is no their property. This opens their private space to public access. What may be intention to use eminent seen as a plan to enhance the community could lead to problems (crime, domain for the purpose of vandalism, trash, pet issues, etc.) for individual property owners. Agree that building bikeways. The for future developments, Planning consider the need for trails and paths in proposed ordinance would dedicated Common areas during the subdivision planning phase. When lots require facilities shown on the are sold, the purchaser can make an informed decision -- are they comfortable plan to be built by the private with property adjacent to trails, paths, or not. sector in conjunction with new development and does not in any way address, or suggest, that the county would construct facilities in existing developments. Amendments to the Comprehensive County Plan for the proposed Bikeways, The proposal is for needs to be delayed. The county is going to take private property, raise my amendments to the Code to taxes, build a boondoggle and waste Millions of $$$$$ on BIKEWAYS. NO require bikeways shown on Thanks! the adopted plan to be built by the private sector in conjunction with new development. Therefore, cost of construction will be borne by new development. Based upon the ordinance, maintenance costs would be borne either by the county or VDOT depending upon the type of facility. 101 Attachment C PROPOSED BICYCLE FACILI'T'IES (BICYCLE, PEDES'T'RIAN AND SHARED USE PA'T'HS) AND BUFFERS IN COMMON AREAS CODE AMENDMENT AND RELATED EMINENT DOMAIN POLICE' WEB POS'T'ING -PUBLIC COMMEN'T'S AND S'T'AFF RESPONSES Comment Staff Res onse First tell us the impact it will have on landowners and tax payers See above response. Please do not IMPOSE the Bikeways zoning regulations on the citizens and developers of Chesterfield County. Most of us are too busy with job, church and children's activities to bike or walk on a regular basis. When we do have the opportunity to bike/walk, we do so in the safety of our own neighborhoods. The benefit of Bikeways to ALL citizens is so limited that we should be spending this valuable time and resources on other pressing problems. Also, we all will have pay the cost and annual maintenance of Bikeways. - original estimate for Bikeways was $350 million but will probably be 3 times that amount when Bikeways is finally completed. The annual maintenance for Bikeways will be staggering. Your help with this problem would be most appreciated. Most of my recommendations reflect changes to decision making authority. Given With a few exceptions, site and the controversial nature of the bike -ways plan, I believe decision making authority subdivision plan review is an for most aspects of this ordnance should reside with the Planning Commission. administrative function through This will ensure public transparency and opportunities for input and understanding which various departments as these changes are implemented. staffs enforce provisions of the 1. 19.1-306 provides authority to the planning department to determine the code. Many sec. of code allow minimum lot width at the boundary of common lots. This authority should reside staff to interpret and implement with the Planning Commission only, the intent of the code. 2. 17-71(c) provides authority to the Planning Commission or director of planning With respect to concerns about to verify whether land is to be dedicated to the county by the subdivider or made handicapped spaces, the VA available for acquisition by the county. This authority should now reside Statewide Building Code exclusively with the Planning Commission. regulates numbers and 3. 17-71(d) provides authority to the Planning Commission or director of planning locations; this ordinance would to verify that the land is: 1. Required for the proposed public use, and 2. Suitable not supersede the building code. for the proposed public use. This authority should now reside exclusively with the Planning Commission. 4. 19.1-239 Bicycle Storage Space Standards provides for bicycle storage spaces should be located as close as practicable to building entrances. This language is in direct conflict with handicap parking spaces for vehicles. This section should be modified to clearly reflect that handicap parking spaces are to be given priority location to building entrances. Bicycle storage spaces should be located to accommodate handicap vehicle parking. 5. 19.1-208 provides authority to the planning department to review and approve bike -way facility type, design and location. This authority should reside with the Planning Commission. The planning department should be given recommendation authority only. 6. 19.1-208 states: If within a county easement on R, R-TH or MH -2 property, such easement shall be located in common area, unless otherwise approved by the Tanning de artment. This authorilX should reside with the Planning Commission. Attachment C PROPOSED BICYCLE FACILITIES (BICYCLE, PEDESTRIAN AND SHARED USE PATHS) AND BUFFERS IN COMMON AREAS CODE AMENDMENT AND RELATED EMINENT DOMAIN POLICY WEB POSTING -PUBLIC COMMENTS AND STAFF RESPONSES Comment On behalf of the Richmond Association of REALTORSO, I would like to offer our full support of the Bikeways & Trails code amendments. We appreciate the time and effort that has gone into crafting it and for allowing members of the community to have a voice in the process. Our staff has looked over the amendments and nothing presents any major concern to us. Additionally, we would like to offer our support of the amendments as they move forward. These are comments on the Proposed Bicycle Facilities (Bicycle, Pedestrian and Shared Use Paths) and Buffers in Common Areas Code Amendment and Related Eminent Domain Policy. I was a supporter of the non -motorized transportation chapter of the Comprehensive Plan last fall. The proposed amendments seem entirely reasonable, and, if adopted, will help facilitate the creation of the paths proposed in the Comprehensive Plan. Let me emphasize that I would not ride a bicycle anywhere in Chesterfield County at present because for me, or for my two elementary school aged grandchildren (who live off Coalfield Road south of Woolridge Road), there is no bicycle route in the county that is safe. To cite three examples in Midlothian: • There is a five-foot bike lane on the north side of Robious Road between Polo Parkway and a few hundred feet west of Salisbury Drive. Last year the County extended that bike lane by constructing a four foot shoulder west to James River Road. But for a potential cyclist like me, a four foot shoulder beside a busy four lane highway with an average speed of 50 mph is not where I want to ride. The standards set forth in the new Chapter approved last fall should require a five-foot bike lane plus a three foot buffer from the travel lanes on a highway like Robious Road. • The bike lanes on Woolridge Rd. between Midlothian Turpike and Coalfield Road are worse. The 45+ mph traffic on Woolridge appears to be as heavy as it is on Robious. I've measured the bike lanes and found that on the north side in some places they are less than three feet wide , and on the south side less than two feet wide. • The two year old paved shoulders along Huguenot Road between Polo Drive and Forest Hill Road are even less safe because of their substandard design, high traffic volumes and speeds on Huguenot Road, and frequent side streets. Yet on the Bicycle Trails plan map in the "Code Amendment Relative to Bicycle Facilities and Lot Size Reductions..." document, the above sections of Robious Road, Woolridge Road and Huguenot Road are shown as "Existing facilities and designated routes on or along roads". To facilitate and encourage safe bicycling in the county, properly designed bikeways are essential. The present code amendments will help, They will help provide enough room in the right of way of roads to be able to construct bikeways that will be safe and comfortable for riders of all skill levels. That is the standard needed so that bikeways will actually be used by a range of Countv residents. Staff Attachment C PROPOSED BICYCLE FACILITIES (BICYCLE, PEDESTRIAN AND SHARED USE PATHS) AND BUF'F'ERS IN COMMON AREAS CODE AMENDMENT AND RELATED EMINENT DOMAIN POLICE' WEB POSTING -PUBLIC COMMENTS AND STAFF RESPONSES Comment Please stop the plans to implement bike trails in the county. This is an expensive plan that would benefit only a few! Peoples privacy and land will be impacted....this is not fair to aW ! Please stop this!! Great! I wholeheartedly support bicycles, pedestrian and shared use paths. (Our county BOS is preparing to hoist new zoning regulations on the backs of taxpayers in support of Bikeways.) Bikeways is still a 350 mile park for the benefits of a few .... and will be paid for by the many/ALL taxpayers. Most taxpayers do not have the free time or money to bike or walk regularly. Those who can, bike and walk in the safety of their own neighborhood. Bikeways is part of a progressive world-wide program to get you out of you cars, out of your single-family homes and into the crowded cities where you can walk or bike to your work and to the grocery store. They want the USA to become Europe. Please delay the new zoning regulations until the impact they will have on landowners, taxpayers and developers is revealed to all taxpayers. We have too many important challenges to be spending value time and staff resources on a program to benefit the few who have the time and money to walk and bike outside their own neighborhood. I have spoken against this at the Board of Supervisors meeting many times as have a large number of people. �..� Irl.•\ � .v i A_ �..x� Attachment C PROPOSED BICYCLE FACILITIES (BICYCLE, PEDESTRIAN AND SHARED USE PATHS) AND BUFFERS IN COMMON AREAS CODE AMENDMENT AND RELATED EMINENT DOMAIN POLICY WEB POSTING -PUBLIC COMMENTS AND STAFF RESPONSES Comment Staff Res onse The proposed County Eminent Domain Policy states that "the County will not Cost estimates provided during use the power of eminent domain to acquire property (including easements) the preparation of the Bikeways for the development of bicycle" paths. But isn't that inconsistent with what and Trails Chapter were the County staff presented concurrently with its proposed ordinance (on page compiled from several sources 18, Section 19.1-208) requiring that the bikeways shall be "provided" by the including Virginia Department landowner as a condition before a site plan or subdivision plat on his or her of Transportation, nearby land can be approved and that construction be "completed" prior to locality projects and county recordation of certain lots? projects. While some figures It appears that the new Section 19.1-208 of the currently proposed Bikeways were estimates based upon Ordinance requires, under various circumstances, that a landowner who wants construction costs only, others to develop his land, would now be required to (1) reserve the land, (2) give were actual project costs the land (or right of way or easement) to the government for free, and including preliminary furthermore requires that the landowner (3) spend money to pay for the engineering, right-of-way bikeways and (4) complete the construction of the bikeways. acquisition, utility relocation During the public hearings, an average figure of a $1,000,000 a mile was and construction. The average communicated for the bikeways, not including the cost or value of the land. figure of $1,000,000 per mile Questions were raised as to where the money was going to come from. Was it would fall into the latter ever represented to the public that the cost of the bikeways was going to be category — based on actual forced onto landowners if they wanted to use their property and get a site plan projects costs including the cost approved? or value of the land. Doesn't the proposed ordinance take private property for a bikeway without requiring compensation, and additionally require the landowner to pay to build the bikeway? Indeed, isn't the regulation (proposed ordinance) itself taking without compensation with legal exposure and potential expense to the County? Including defending claims of inverse condemnation? Don't such a regulatory taking violate Virginia law and doesn't the proposed Ordinance go beyond what was adopted in the Comprehensive "Plan" last year by the prior Board? Some of my clients have urged that the County (1) revise the proposed Ordinance to reflect the voluntary nature of the program and (2) modify the proposed Eminent Domain Policy (sample language attached) to provide that the County will not acquire such property or facilities by regulatory requirements. Suggested Modifications CHESTERFIELD COUNTY EMINENT DOMAIN POLICY (B!keww &Bikeway & Trails Chapter of the Comprehensive Plan) 1_Under applicable law, Chesterfield County is permitted to use the power of eminent domain to acquire private property for public use subject to the requirement to pay just compensation for the property acquired. The County's use of eminent domain must comply with the United States Constitution and the Virginia Constitution. Eminent domain may be used to acquire property for public purposes such as, but not limited to: (i) public roads and rights of way, (it) public facilities such as fire stations, schools and parks, and (iii) public wastewater and water systems. -Under Virginia law, each exercise of eminent domain by the County must be authorized by a vote of the Board of Supervisors after conducting a public hearing. 2. On November 18, 2015, the Board of Supervisors amended the Comprehensive Plan for the County by adding a new Chapter 14 titled Bikeways and Trails. This chapter focuses enof the development of bicycle, pedestrian and shared use pathway facilities throughout the County. 3. it is the policy of the Board of Supervisors that the County will neither use the power of eminent domain nor reeulatory requirement to acquire property (including easements) for the development of bicycle, pedestrian or shared use pathway facilities that will be located outside of right-of-way proposed or intended to be maintained by the Virginia Department of Transportation. 4_ Notwithstanding the above, this policy does not apply to the acquisition of property for the development of bicycle, pedestrian or shared use pathway facilities: (i) that does not involve the exercise of eminent domain or regulatory requirement including, without limitation, the urehase e fjfapert-y ,.. acquiring property through gift or voluntary dedication and/or (ii) where a person owning an interest in such property is unknown or Gann et be, IR_..Hat oA _ 5. The Board of Supervisors may waive or revoke this policy by majority vote. Attachment C PROPOSED BICYCLE FACILITIES (BICYCLE, PEDESTRIAN AND SHARED USE PATHS) AND BUFFERS IN COMMON AREAS CODE AMENDMENT AND RELATED EMINENT DOMAIN POLICE' WEB POSTING -PUBLIC COMMENTS AND STAFF RESPONSES Comment As a resident of Chesterfield, a strong supporter of increased bicycling options for residents, and someone who has worked on transportation issues for a number of years, I would like to commend County Planning staff for the proposed code amendments regarding bike facilities and buffers in common areas. The amendments will foster greater safety for pedestrians and bicyclists, increase the appeal of alternative transportation modes, and quite literally pave the way for the new routes envisioned in the "Bikeways and Trails" chapter of the County's Comprehensive Plan. It is especially encouraging that the amendments will require non-residential development projects going through the site plan or subdivision review processes to provide planned bikeways, with separated shared use paths the preferred facility. Other aspects of the amendment add to its practicality, including the measurement of required setback for non-residential buildings from the original rather than the expanded right-of-way perimeter; the waiving of limited numbers of automobile parking spaces in return for short-term bicycle storage spaces; and the reductions in minimum lot size for properties bordering bikeways. These sensible terms will help make the provision of bikeways and bicycle parking a feasible, attractive opportunity, rather than an onus, for Chesterfield businesses and institutions. One concern is that neither the Comprehensive Plan nor the proposed amendments distinguish between planned on -road facilities (such as bike lanes and wide shoulders) and along -road facilities (such as shared -use paths running parallel to a road). The codified definition for "bikeways" includes both types of improvements, and both are shown in blue on the Bikeways and Trails Plan Map. The determination of the exact type and dimensions of the bike facility will be left to the plan review process. Yet shoulders, bike lanes, and shared -use paths provide vastly different rider experiences and levels of safety. The appropriateness of a given facility varies with traffic volume and speed, number of lanes, and topography. Without direction, developers may choose the cheapest option rather than the safest and most useful one. I would therefore suggest the addition of language stipulating which type of facility must be provided given the site conditions, as other counties have done [see, for example, the Loudoun County Bicycle and Pedestrian Mobility Master Plan, which provides a matrix for choosing facilities based on roads' functional classification and adjacent planned land uses (p.29)]. In addition, the portion of the ordinance that addresses "bicycle storage spaces" could be strengthened by greater specificity. Currently, the proposed code simply requires that storage be designed and located such that it is "effectively usable." More guidance is necessary to ensure that storage is not only usable but also visible and convenient. The proposed code amendment should include items such as: Location of bicycle racks in a well -lit area within x feet of the primary building entrance; Dimensions of the rack and pedestrian access aisle, or minimum distance from a vertical surface; Type of rack used, e.g. inverted "U" racks as recommended by the Association of Pedestrian and Bicycle Professionals, rather than grill racks. Fairfax County offers an excellent example of a bicycle parking policy to promote "ample, safe, and secure" bicycle storage. These modest changes would strengthen the proposed amendments, and I urge their incorporation. Again, I applaud Planning Department staff for developing the proposed code amendments, and I strongly support them. I look forward to the improvements to the bicycle and pedestrian network these provisions will bring and hope that in the future, Chesterfield bikeways and bicycle storage policies will extend to all development in the County— including residential construction. Thank you for your consideration of these comments. Staff �gk7RLp�,O�:, r 19© z„r?RCFP`t COUNTYCHESTERFIELD BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Meeting Date: September 28, 2016 Item Number: 8.C.5. Approval by the Board of Supervisors of the Appointment of Mr. Louis Lassiter and Mr. Scott Zaremba as Deputy County Administrators County Administrator® Board Action Requested: The Board is requested to approve the appointment of Mr. Louis Lassiter and Mr. Scott Zaremba as Deputy County Administrators. Under § 4.2 of the County Charter, the Board must approve the appointment of Deputy County Administrators as recommended by the County Administrator. The County Administrator recommends that the Board approve the appointment of Mr. Louis Lassiter and Mr. Scott Zaremba as Deputy County Administrators effective October 1, 2016. Mr. Lassiter's current position of Assistant County Administrator will be deleted upon his assumption of new Deputy County Administrator position. Mr. Zaremba's position is replacing the vacancy that is currently being served in an interim role by Ms. Rebecca Dickson, whose role ends September 23, 2016. Preparers Dr. Joseph P. Casey Title: County Administrator 0425:97287.1 Attachments: Yes No # . -� Meeting Date: September 28, 2016 Item Number: 8.C.6. Initiate an Application for Rezoning, Plus Conditional Use and Conditional Use Planned Development to Permit a Private School with Customary and Incidental Uses and Exceptions to Ordinance Requirements on a Total of 124 Acres Located at 6050 Newbys Bridge Road and 9721 Burnett Drive Initiate an Application for Rezoning from 'Residential Townhouse (R-TH) to Agricultural (A) of 94 acres, plus Conditional Use to permit a private school with customary and incidental uses and Conditional Use Planned Development to permit exceptions to ordinance requirements on this property and an adjacent 30 -acre parcel zoned Agricultural (A) located at 6050 Newbys Bridge Road and 9721 Burnett Drive (Tax IDs 753-677-8598 and 755-677-2504); appoint Kirkland Turner, Director of Planning, as the Board's agent; and waive disclosure requirements. Virginia law permits the Board of Supervisors to initiate a rezoning application on the principles of good zoning practice and general welfare to consider land uses that are not permitted under current zoning regulations. Consideration of this request will provide for a public process to review and determine if any adverse impacts would be generated on the property(s), on adjacent property owners, or the County in general and, if so, to determine what conditions might alleviate any adverse impacts and enhance land use compatibility. Preparer: Kirkland A. Turner Attachments: Yes ■ CHESTERFIELD COUNT s BOARD OF SUPERVISORII- D Mr. Holland is requesting that the Board initiate an application for a rezoning from Residential Townhouse (R-TH) to Agricultural (A) of 94 acres, plus with a Conditional Use to permit a private school (Banner Christian School) with customary and incidental uses plus Conditional Use Planned Development to permit exceptions to ordinance requirements on this parcel and an adjacent 30 -acre parcel zoned Agricultural (A) District. The ordinance does not permit by right a private school on property zoned for agricultural use. Meetinq Date: September 28, 2016 Item Number: 8.C.7. Acceptance of State Roads ill , , . 6; # Adoption of resolutions for the referenced state roads acceptances. Midlothian District: Hallsley Section 6 Hallsley Section 11 'ier: Scott B. Smedley- Director, Environmental• p - Attachments: Yes ❑IST® TO: Board of Supervisors FROM: Department ofEnviroamental Engineering SUBJECT State Road Acceptance - Hallsley Section 6 DISTRICT Midlothian ROADS FOR CONSIDER -1710M: Col wynBay lDr Drumane Rd Old Castle Ct Old CastleRd Vicinity Map: Hal Isley Section 6 Produced Ep Chmbrrm fzuntj,GE& 'TO: Board of Supervisors FROM: Department of Environmental Engineering SUBJECT State Road Acceptance ® Hallsley Section 11 DISTRICT Midlothian MEE-nNG DATE: September 28, 2016 ROADS FOR CONSIDERATON: OIC Castle Ind Vicinity Map: HaIlsley Section 11 PTOffuzed By cftesbrroAd rountl C.3 COUNTYCHESTERFIELD BOARD AGENDA Meeting Date: September 28, 2016 Item Number: 8.C.8. Approval of Change Order Number Two for the Falling Creek Greenway Improvements Project County Administrator:' Board Action egueste&.— The Board of Supervisors is requested to authorize the Director of Purchasing to execute Change Order Number Two with Dickerson Construction LLC for the Falling Creek Greenway Improvements in the amount of $64,223.05. In March of 2015, the Board approved execution of a construction contract for construction of a 0.4 mile pathway and trail system along Falling Creek, a special event area, two historical interpretation overlooks and a parking lot. County funding for these improvements is supplemented by grant funds from the VDOT Transportation Enhancement Grant Program. This project is the initial phase of planned developments along Falling Creek to showcase its 400 year history and the first segment of the Bikeways and Trails Plan system along Falling Creek. These facilities will provide new access to Falling Creek and will provide historical interpretation of the 1619-22 Ironworks, walking, fishing, and nature observation opportunities for the public. Change Order Number Two will address unforeseen additional costs for undercut of unsuitable soils and stabilization of subsurface obstructions, storm drainage system modifications, storm damage to completed work, adjustments to walking pathways and additional asphalt paving to reduce maintenance costs. Existing appropriations in parks capital improvement projects are sufficient to cover the cost of the change order. -•. -r: James t Worsley . repa Allan Attachments: El Yes �. reap"*R ,. •', •� No0 # " � � 2 y -L Mee�ing Date: September 28, 2016 Itern-ilumber: 8.C.9. Approval of Change Order Number Two for Ettrick-VSU Riverside Trail and Parking Lot County Administrator: Board Action Requested; The Board of Supervisors is requested to authorize the Director of Purchasing to execute Change Order Number Two with Brock Construction, Inc. in the amount of $47,139.79. In March of 2015, the Board approved execution of a construction contract for construction of a parking lot and 0.37 miles of ADA accessible trail. This project is being developed in partnership with VSU and is partially funded through a VDOT Transportation Enhancement Grant Program. The trail and parking area are located on property leased from VSU. This segment is the initial phase of a portion of the Bikeways and Trails Plan along the Appomattox River. The trailhead will be accessed from Main Street. This facility will provide new access to the Appomattox River and provide walking, fishing, and nature observation opportunities for park visitors. The original contract with Brock Construction, Inc. totaled $365,000. Change order number one in the amount of $45,851.06 was issued in January 2016. That change order represented a 12.56 percent increase in the original contract. Change order number two in the amount of $47,139.79, represents a cumulative change in the original contract of 25.48 percent. Per county policy, for construction contracts totaling less than $500,000, all change orders shall be approved by the Board when all change orders collectively increase the amount of the contract by more than 20 percent. ,�"reparer: James D. Worsley Title: Director, Parks and Recreation — Allan Carmody Title: Director, Budget and Manaqemen�- t ac s ® Yes No # . a 4 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY VOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 2 of AGENDA Change Order Number Two will address unforeseen additional costs for removal of rock and unsuitable soils, improve storm water drainage system and addition of stone shoulders along the trail to reduce maintenance costs. Existing appropriations in parks capital improvement projects are sufficient to cover the cost of the change order. CHESTERFIELD COUNTYBOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page of1 �7Rra2ttA ;"AGENDA ate: September 28, 2016 Item Number: 8.C.10.a. Request Permission for Proposed Five -Foot Asphalt Trails and Pedestrian Footbridges to Encroach in Variable Width Storm Water Management System/Best Management Practice (SWM/BMP) Easements, Twenty -Foot Sewer Easements, Sixteen -Foot Sewer Easements, Twenty -Five -Foot Sewer Easements, a Fifty -Foot Sewer Easement and Sixteen -Foot Drainage Easements Within Hallsley, Phase II County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Grant East West-Hallsley, L.L.C. permission for proposed 5 -foot asphalt trails and pedestrian footbridges to encroach in variable width SWM/BMP easements, 20 -foot sewer easements, 16 -foot sewer easements, 25 -foot sewer easements, a 50 -foot sewer easement and 16 -foot drainage easements within Hallsley, Phase II, subject to the execution of a license agreement. East West-Hallsley, L.L.C. has requested permission for proposed 5 -foot asphalt trails and pedestrian footbridges to encroach in variable width SWM/BMP easements, 20 -foot sewer easements, 16 -foot sewer easements, 25' sewer easements, a 50 -foot sewer easement and 16 -foot drainage easements within Hallsley, Phase II. This request has been reviewed by Environmental Engineering, Utilities and the Planning Department. Approval is recommended. District: Midlothian r-reparer:I �. •� • Attachments: Yes No s �r+r.�ti.rr'v VICINITY SKETCH 13hestafield County Dspsmtmpnt -0 Utildes vg I 7� �61 ENCROACHMENT AREAS GPIN Section Lot Easement Deed Page Owner Sheet Encroarhme nt of 5'Asphalt Trail Type Book Numbers Linear Feet S ¢care Feet 710-699-5156 5 Open Space A SWM/BMP 10562 607 East West - Hallsley, LLC 2 181 905 710-699-9913 7 Open Space B Sanitary Sewer 10501 685 East West - Hallsley, LLC 2 38 182 68 220 Sanitary Sewer 7500 274 3 29 1D5 226 1168 Sanitary Sewer 10176 664 711-697-4901) 6 Open Space A East West - Hallsley, LLC 3 35 148 SWWBMP 10301 698 .1 380 1897 Sanitary Sewer P.B.225 58 3 12 - 58 83 416 P.S.Drainage 227 53 4 16 82 Drainage P.B. 227 56 4 16 83 Sanitary Sewer P.B.227 55 4,5 438 2190 Sanita Sewer PA I54 95 711-694.4178 11 Open Space East West- Hallsley, LLC 5 43 216 5 417 2104 Sanitary Sewer 10616 88 5 81 mm 404 6 328 1662 6 77S 3874 710-694-1457 17 Open Space E Sanitary Sewer 10616 88 East West - Hallsley, LLC 7794 3968 8 X07 1534 Sanitary Sewer P.8.2A9 24 7 194 970 709-695-6738 17 22 Private Sidewalk 11318 S35 Hamesinith Construction, Inc. 7 163 819 - 709-695-5449 rl - 23 Sanitary Sewer 10616 88 8 307 1534 ^ ^ 708-695-9766 20 Open Space East West- Hallsley, LLC 8 432 2161 Sewer P.B.Sanitary 239 31-33 8 227 1135 709-696-30R4 19 Open Space B Sanitary Sewer -___ 10616 East West - Hallsley, LLC 8, 9 9,10 5-39 529 2943 2644 703-697-7310 19 Open Space A Last West - Hallsley, LLC Drainage 10926 123 10 123 633 708.697-7781:0�8-6977781 12 �19 Drainage P.8.234 10 East West- 14allMey, LLC 10 278 390 L HALLSLEY DAM 9-9-16 "=100' PEDESTRIAN TRAIL PHASE [I SCALE: 1 JOB NO:C1200423.00 EASEMENTS EXHIBIT SHEET: 1 OF 15 11 CO PR0J # -0320 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY, VA -PLANNERS -ARCHITECTS- ENGINEERS* SURVEYORS- REFLEC-01,10 TOM*AROW 15871 City View Orive ® Suite 200 ® Midlothian, Virginia 23113 - Phone (804) 794-0571 - Fax (804, 794-2635 wwwbalzer.cc \ o Zc� O G� iri Z { yt Z \\ \ Oo p > i F_ _ �j jr m�7 m _ m Zc)m 0 _ m -0 if % Go (A Z i { M ID % M rrl CY3 D fI3 � c9 i�J > cD M V) :EO C) ` G9 CJ7 .i M D Com") G�7 MT � cl) 0 Fri t m a > V) A Y> ",V i C) d �p --jM \ 0 7y M tD � M N DATE HALLSLEY SCALE: 1 "=1 PEDESTRIAN TRAIL PHASE II AND ASSOCIATES iNC. SCALA: 1 °°-1 CO' JOB NO:C1200423.00 EASEMENTS EXHIBIT Iffilklomm SHEET: 2 OF 11 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY, VA -PLANNERS a ARCHITECTS- ENGINEERS- SURVEYORS - 15871 City View Drive ® Suits 200 ® Kcilothiar, Wginia 23113 - Phcne (804) -104-0571 ° Fax (804) 7944,1635 www baizer.cc oc'm > Z CA m Lo rTl x" "'1 0 cn > m r- 0) r a T (o mcn 2Z a m (f) 0 cn 0 C) m U 71 > * -0 p - z z 2 0 M >m Ln F_ It, I z -TI per's r- -9 - 0') r I U > m > r— V) 03 7� 'o m 0 mi *:pmoo zzpo>f- 4N. rri (n z rT, V > rr 0 0 0 m x -0 r Vsrn M --q Z co cc V) C) -'j c') co ug m > c) > M Z 0 m > 0 J A3_1 IA08V )HS 3NIII-131VA, HALLSLEY DATE: 9-9-16 PEDESTRIAN TRAIL PHASE 11 SCALE: 1 "=1 CO' JOB NO:CI200423.00 EASEMENTS EXHIBIT SHEET: 3 OF 11 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY, VA 'PLANNERS - ARCHITECTS - ENGINEERS - SURVEYORS - 15871 City View Drive - Suite 200 - Midlothiar,, Wginja 23113 - Phcne (804) 794-0571 - Fax (804) 794-2635 www.balzer.cc MATC�LHL - I�E AB'RIGHT E MATCPVNESHEET 3 ,NE ... m 0 m 0 m 0 M 0--Q 700 m 0 (A (A > , m > z CD > > 17-U) rt im m > M m > r r- > > (. r- U) -00 r- --f r -r V) :E rm:* > < m p- M > > () -n > 00 M� 0 C) m > m ct) r1l MM- > ti 0 N) A> 0 m M rn Z t1 2 4 r > Ln m 00 m m > CID cl) '> w -'j c MM- M f- > >> 0 Cl m 7 LO r -j 0 1 Go M--� > Z = - V. * M (.0 >------ 7777 -10 M (Am 0 r -0 c- ri �b Q 00 m cn -9 cr) r Q) 7 (A 0 9 1 t S 3NIIHO�LVM .. ...... � "M 138"J I H:)j-'M HALLSLEY 0'... =.,.. DATE: 9-9-16 "=I PEDEST RIAN TRAIL PHASE 11 . SCALE� 1 00' JOB NO:CI200423.00 EASEMENTS EXHIBIT KWA Rill 0 a SHEET: 4 OF 11 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY, VA 15871 LL- City View PLANNERS - ARCHITECTS - ENGINEERS - SUR` R EYORS® TOMORROW C ' )rive ®Suite 200 - Midlolhian, Virginia 23713 - Phone (804) 794-0571 - Fax (804) 794-283,5 www.balzer.ec MATCHLiNE SHEET 6 m ' D 11 C? tX3 P T 00 � o 2 > >' m '— O (A hoz : C� ca Vr Css _ om(A >0 c,� cc -� M'D > 0>, , _. r �f (n 0 �� mZ D . m �4�� r> o i j CT7 4 0 C CC)k t r— Sa -L7 T Ct} o ` C* J oma".. 1 Ci -r1 > 0 G7 HALLSLEY MA590.° /�✓ Z - 1� (7 ga C7 2 , JOB NO: C7200423M EASEMENTS EXHIBIT mZ0O TE L+1 � Ln SHEET:5 OF 11 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY, VA -PLANNERS NEN a ARCHITECTS- ENGINEERS- SURVE O S ° R�gs�ari �fl ToMoRRow > '. C�li�t�pmV) N i m ' D 11 C? tX3 P n' tom' m ,z C� ca Vr Css _ om(A > 0>, , (n 0 m �4�� o C CC)k t HALLSLEY MA590.° DATE: s SCALE: I"= "= 11 QC}' PEDESTRIAN TRAIL PHASE 11 All. les it4c , JOB NO: C7200423M EASEMENTS EXHIBIT SHEET:5 OF 11 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY, VA -PLANNERS NEN a ARCHITECTS- ENGINEERS- SURVE O S ° R�gs�ari �fl ToMoRRow 15871, V,ev/ Drive - Suite 200 • Wdbt pian. `A ginia 2'31,13 ® PhOne {804) 794-0671 + Fax (804) 704-2635 wwmb8Pierxc SHEET 7 0 rn -U jom �9 0 o --q o M> M Le)Z0 0 c) T 21k 5z 7 'b m m 00 M m Ln > -TI 0 'mo 0 U) cn lIj -4 C.0 70 ,g 133H s 3N1 1HolvN HALLSLEY bAM DATE: 9-9-16 PEDESTRIAN TRAIL PHASE 11 AND ASSOCIATES INC SCALE: 1 "=100' JOB NO: 01200423,00 EASEMENTS EXHIBIT SHEET: 6 OF 11 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY, VA - PLANNERS - ARCHITECTS - ENGINEERS - SURVEYORS- ACFLECTINO TO* ..... �'o* 15871 r3itV View DrKe - Suite 200 - Miolothiar. Virginia 23113 ® Phone (804) 794-0571 - Pax (8Q4) 794-2535 mm.bafter.= MATCH LIN E 0 ca C) L4 U) cn 0 m c_n 0 > M m > M W Z 0-0 r-- ':* 41 -U 00 co M;r, m �u (n ::E I > < — () -py E5 > pm 0 0 Z> M.- m 0' -4 j: m r > -TI - > > r z z c)) * 4b, 0 > i :2E m m > f7 i oom— -< SHEET 7 0 rn -U jom �9 0 o --q o M> M Le)Z0 0 c) T 21k 5z 7 'b m m 00 M m Ln > -TI 0 'mo 0 U) cn lIj -4 C.0 70 ,g 133H s 3N1 1HolvN HALLSLEY bAM DATE: 9-9-16 PEDESTRIAN TRAIL PHASE 11 AND ASSOCIATES INC SCALE: 1 "=100' JOB NO: 01200423,00 EASEMENTS EXHIBIT SHEET: 6 OF 11 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY, VA - PLANNERS - ARCHITECTS - ENGINEERS - SURVEYORS- ACFLECTINO TO* ..... �'o* 15871 r3itV View DrKe - Suite 200 - Miolothiar. Virginia 23113 ® Phone (804) 794-0571 - Pax (8Q4) 794-2535 mm.bafter.= MATCHLINE SHEET 0 'W c- ZZ M cil M z Z > W (A M to V) M r1l) I . �9 0 > > r - C/) z --- A cl) (D (A > m > r - n co 7z -p- M %E U 1-4 to j 00 00 cl) m > z /"n/ > r A > 00 Q G) to Cn C:: "n 0 (7) Ul 4, > rrl m r1l r_,- M > Tj > Z (A cn > m 1O)MO m 0 cy) b > C M cri (c) Ln N3 (n > C) > c) 0) > 00 9 133HS 3NIIHOiVIN HALLSLEY DATE: 9-9-16 SCALE: 1 "_ 100' PEDESTRIAN TRAIL PHASE 11 JOB NQ:C1200423.00 EASEMENTS EXHIBIT WON= SHEET: 7 OF 11 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY, VA PLANNERS - ARCHITECTS - ENGINEERS - SURVEYORS- REFLECInNo TomoRR*W 15871 City View Drive - Suite 200 -.Vjdbthian, Virginia 23113 - Phone (804) 794-0571 - Fax (804) 794-2635 vWww.balzer,ce --l- ------ — — — I MATCHUNE SHEET 9 Z 0 > 0 co 0M -rj > 0 9 (/) ZZ 0 u) 01 M r.- (A 1 -0 L11 rTl Dann ILOz M* (n 0> -um C) c -n 63 0 1 M M (n C) 0 0 V) z Lo M z Z riaM M * -V m (p Z-0 z nor'' > c) Z m NJ> N) (A C N3 I 13 C7 cp--- I Qi m T 0 MM r-> >> z C4 > r- (n f- --I m w Z f— t M 'n > m rq I (f) r— cri oma f— a0)0 M ::E -u m (A 0 M z PQ 0 0 > M;ll m�T- r CD a> CO m FT, (3) M 0 > cn 0 -71 vtx j> 0) 0) 0 m !0 (0 � 000, A m cu cn a. 0 M > 0 I 0 r f - z m V) m m 0 HALLSLEY DATE: 9-9-16 PEDESTRIAN TRAIL PHASE 11 SCALE: 1 "=100` JOB NO:C1200423-00 EASEMENTS EXHIBIT SHEET: 8 OF 11 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY, VA - PLANNERS - ARCHITECTS - ENGINEERS - SURVEYORS - 15871 CN View Dive ® Suite 200 - Midlothian, Virginia 23113 - Phone (804) 794-0571 - Fax (804) 794-2635 www.balzer.ce Z 0 > 0 co 0M -rj > 0 9 (/) ZZ 0 u) 01 M r.- (A 1 -0 L11 rTl ILOz M* (n 0> c_q m I cA (A M r- !0 (0 � 000, A m cu cn a. 0 M > 0 I 0 r f - z m V) m m 0 HALLSLEY DATE: 9-9-16 PEDESTRIAN TRAIL PHASE 11 SCALE: 1 "=100` JOB NO:C1200423-00 EASEMENTS EXHIBIT SHEET: 8 OF 11 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY, VA - PLANNERS - ARCHITECTS - ENGINEERS - SURVEYORS - 15871 CN View Dive ® Suite 200 - Midlothian, Virginia 23113 - Phone (804) 794-0571 - Fax (804) 794-2635 www.balzer.ce MATCHLINESREtT 10 0 C) 6 0 (71 z z cn > M ro •—T) Fp z cn C) -0 > 0 - m > T, M r1no 0 > /�� i I r— > r— CA z r— --1 0) U) Fin rT1 m > m (A V 0 --1 cn rq (q (A u cn r - m(')00 -o z U) Z T1 > -- co SM IF C7 C > m 4� <m >* a() 0 > > 0 m(A m cn _0 m W. A/ HALLSLEY DATE: 9-9-16 SCALE: 1"=100* PEDESTRIAN TRAIL PHASE 11 JOB NO:C1200423.00 EASEMENTS EXHIBIT SHEET: 9 OF 11 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY, VA -PLANNERS - ARCKITECTS - ENGINEERS - SURVEYORS- REFLECTiNG TOMORROW 15871 City View Drive-Sute 200- Midlothian, Virginia 23113 -Phone (804) 794-0571 -Fax(8G4)794-2635 www.batzer.ioc c" > -- co SM IF C7 C > m 4� <m >* a() 0 > > 0 m(A m cn _0 m W. A/ HALLSLEY DATE: 9-9-16 SCALE: 1"=100* PEDESTRIAN TRAIL PHASE 11 JOB NO:C1200423.00 EASEMENTS EXHIBIT SHEET: 9 OF 11 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY, VA -PLANNERS - ARCKITECTS - ENGINEERS - SURVEYORS- REFLECTiNG TOMORROW 15871 City View Drive-Sute 200- Midlothian, Virginia 23113 -Phone (804) 794-0571 -Fax(8G4)794-2635 www.batzer.ioc C) 0 c- > > -n F- -6 �g 0 (A u c: > m --j - C-) ZZPCD > m -IN M > mr- r ---A > m 1 0 o c) ni (t0)-Arp M (0 Z—Z ul > W r'j (/) Oma - m (1) -u Fr - (A C) > Fn -0 00 0 c > > '0' m -Tl 0 r- (1) m z e-, q m (A r --j z U) 4LO cn m U) --I > F- rTl c c c) CA c:) 0 C) LTI z rr, > U) -------- c) Q�) > z E� M F- m 71 \ kn 1 0) Z --.- z' (A Lf) > f- <�L I'D 2D �A m Ln MATICHLINE SHEET 9 HALLSLEY DATE: 9-9-16 PEDESTRIAN TRAIL PHASE 11 SCALE: 1 "=100' JOB NO:C1200423.00 EASEMENTS EXHIBIT SHEET: 10 OF 11 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY, VA - PLANNERS - ARCHITECTS - ENGINEERS - SURVEYORS - 15871 City View Drive - Su le 200 - Midlothian, Virginia 231-13 - Phone (8041794-0571 - Fax (604) 794-2635 WWW.balzer.cc SEE OTHER DETAILS TNS SHEET FOR TYP. RMUNG DETAILS _ .... _.t6' MAX WAN HANDRAILS INSTALLED 4x4 P,T. SYP POST _ _ _ _ _ _ AS NECESSARY O '4'-0" G.C. T TL7 CIC.T0c R7 -PROVIDE GRIP TAPE ON i € I I I I I I I t I I I €€ it I I I RAMP SECTIONS 3.5" DECKING € II 11 11 PI 11 IE €1 1E H I SCREWS 18° O.C. P.T. 2X4 DECKING P.T. 2X4 DECKING E 1 II it PI II €! if EI II IE I 0 EACH SEWIt it It 11 It It II Il 11 II I DETAIL N.F.S. €€I ' 11 11 EI It 11 II 13 II I I PLUSH TRANSITION 1X P.T. FINISH BO. !It II II N q i! 1! II II If # NAILED TO 7X12. 1 II II N €1 it if €1 II it € (3)2X 127 P.T. BEAMS 18" O.C_ t .�. _ - 6, j 1/2"0 CARRAGE , BOLT & WASHERS { �� (TYP.) 3' O.C. 4� TRANSITION TO TRAIL 2` FINISH NAILS a CONT. P.. 2X BLOCKING, BOLTED TO TOP OF BEAM TAGGER & NOTCH BEAMS TO (3) P.T. 2X12 SCREWED AY.0 FOOTER AND BRIDGE BEAMS TO TOP DECK t 2*XS" P.T. ANCHOR BOARD ORO. PL. O EA. BEAM FOOTBRIDGE DETAIL THICK REINP. :. WALL. 24" BELOW EX GRADE. 1/2-0 A.B.'S THRU BEAMS INTO WALL HALLSLE`i DATE:9---9_16 PEDESTRIAN WALK PHASE II SCALE:N.T,S.JOB NO:C1200423 FOOTBRIDGE DETAIL SHEET: 11 OF 11 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY, SIA -PLANNERS -ARCHITECTS • ENGINEERS • SURVEYORS - 15871 City View ]Drive • Suite 200 - Midlothian, V;rginia 23`13 a Phone (8O4) 794-0571 a Fax (804) 794-2535 www.balxer.cc e`°foGCHESTERFIELD BOARD OF SUPERVISORSPage 1 of 1 �a AGENDA Meeting Date: Septemb er 28, 2016 Item Number: 8.C.10.b. Request Permission for a Proposed Screen Porch and Landing to Encroach Within an Eight -Foot Easement Across Lot 14, Riverton, Section C 5 Grant John T. Hutchison and Mary Beth Hutchison permission for a proposed screen porch and landing to encroach within an 8 -foot easement across Lot 14, Riverton, Section C, subject to the execution of a license agreement. John T. Hutchison and Mary Beth Hutchison have requested permission for a proposed screen porch and landing to encroach within an 8 -foot easement across Lot 14, Riverton, Section C. This request has been reviewed by Environmental Engineering, Utilities, Planning, Comcast and Verizon. A building permit and administrative waiver to make improvements in the floodplain setback will also be required. Approval is recommended. District: Dale Preparer: John W. Harmon Title: Real Property Manager Attachments: Yes No VICINITY SKETCH Request Permission for a Proposed Screen Porch and Landing to Encroach within an Eight -Foot Easement Across Lot 14, Riverton, Section C C/) W REQUEST PERMISSION FOR A A PROPOSED SCREENED z PORCH AND LANDING . 4L - IN V V 1A N Chestfsfisld Ccouny DLpartmrt of Utilifiss *251 W S I Vch - 416 671W, m Screened Porch 4' x 18' Landing -4'x4' A�( John T. Hutchison Mary Beth Hutchison 3612 Raftersridge Or D8. 5566 Pg. 385 PIN: 730724539000000 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 1 of 1 AGENDA Meeting Date: September 28, 2016 Item Number: &C.10.c. Request Permission for a Proposed Privacy Fence to Encroach Within a Sixteen - Foot Easement and a Sixteen -Foot Drainage Easement Across Lot 32, Walnut Grove, Section 2 MOTI-IT11 =71 • Grant Scott M. Keeven and Tara Michelle �eeven permission for a proposed privacy fence to encroach within a 16 -foot easement and a 16 -foot drainage easement across Lot 32, Walnut Grove, Section 2, subject to the execution of a license agreement. Scott M. Keeven and Tara Michelle Keeven have requested permission for a proposed privacy fence to encroach within a 16 -foot easement and a 16 -foot drainage easement across Lot 32, Walnut Grove, Section 2. This request has been reviewed by Utilities, Environmental Engineering, Planning, Comcast and Verizon. The existing storm sewer will not be affected. Approval is recommended. District. Clover Hill -•. re r: John W. Harmon- Real Property .• Attachments: Yes IST® VICINITY SKETCH Request Permission for a Proposed Privacy Fence to Encroach within a Sixteen -Foot Easement and a Sixteen -Foot Drainage Easement Across Lot 32, Walnut Grove, Section 2 REQUEST PERMISSION FOR A PROPOSED PRIVACY FENCE a ChE-str4field Cnunty D_-radrnert of Utilities ha415:. R7 "tet .t y R I"' 32 1�258.7939 FT 0 • s ES CX +, / a 1. t WAS t • � .9 R r R. y +R R. R f♦ ... .. tr r! ►R + 1• F " s i ice•; 'v '� v rfi-m °/!l \ l 's Yrs • � �: a s: �.� s." i s`:; ._ «_ ..,. /'rri see'.♦ � a s' -i i •,w _� _ .r 1 s � a CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Pageof 1 ' AGENDA Meeting Date: September 28, 2016 Item Number: 8.C.1l.a. Acceptance of Parcels of Land for Henricus Park and the Dutch Gap Conservation Area County Administrator,° Board Action Requested: , Accept the conveyance of three parcels of land containing a total of 120 acres, more or less, for Henricus Park and the Dutch Gap Conservation Area from Vulcan Lands, Inc. and Tarmac Virginia, Inc. and authorize the County Administrator to execute the deeds. Staff requests that the Board of Supervisors accept the conveyance of three parcels of land containing a total of 120 acres, more or less, for Henricus Park and the Dutch Gap Conservation Area. There are current park improvements on these properties that were believed to be conveyed to the county previously. They include portions of the old river bed including "Big Dutch Gap" and property in Henrico County. Approval is recommended. District: Bermuda Preparer: John W. Harmon Title: Real PropertV Manager VICINITY SKETCH 1111111�� q� lipiliq �1114.11,��27%lq N Chesterfield County RigM of Way Office w E Spptember S. 21316 I Mh - 197,,Y, tet - �l (C) 0 1?, ,A- �Nm��mno IT( zm �mc��°Dv if+t�mmz�r�*�N t/IZA-1y"l0� -i momNAz Kmm�mN ism a zom�cn�o� NN ozmm��m�mA 4m;mo=o ADN { -" -Dmf U INNmm.2 m o _ m. pz 3 D rn m N m S y ti =ms�m z�A0o o^m6S 0 - e�o� r o 2 o N COOMY F CH,STERFl p �CWNTY OF HENWCO Il v r� ~ r_, '_;}ilE LINEINE (Pg,56, PC 7223 'r \ r Old Parcel JAMES RIVER y b cl c COMPILED MAP p_ $ i3r TAC a� P&R HENRICUS PARK w: -- rs-roa -nNRe '.011 o$ AND mE 1 O '!.p 1 Bc� dsr Sp,mg, t ,7, Ri. h V7g nia ee".3?2v c ADJACENT PARCELS gN 3 of a 804 g g l rac it r2 ra 1 ~—brockenbrough.com OG R` ` SCIIE CHESTERFELD. HENRICC -COUNTY NRGINIA VMT 9°=i06' RKRURRIp- a00o I gq �gF5 §N � COMPILED MAP MAP SHOWING LAND LYING BETWEEN HENRICUS PARK AND DUTCH CAP LANDING CHESTERFIELD COUNTY VIRGINIA Cwqmplhln North A Benbrough I TAC I CC w—b—thenbrough.c.. CHESTERFIELD BOARD OF SUPERVISORSPage 1 of 1 =¢N AGENDA Meeting D.. September 1 b b. Acceptance of a Parcel of Land Along Belmont Road from Par 5 Development Group, LLC County Administrator Board Action Requested: Accept the conveyance of a parcel Belmont Road from Par 5 Development Administrator to execute the deed. of land containing 0.132 acres along Group, LLC and authorize the County Staff requests that the Board of Supervisors accept the conveyance of a parcel of land containing 0.132 acres along Belmont Road from Par 5 Development Group, LLC. This dedication is to provide the ultimate right of way for Belmont Road and is a requirement for the development of Dollar General at 6219 Belmont Road. Approval is recommended. District: Dale ■ _ •:. ^John W. -Harmon Attachments: E Yes Real PropertV.g- H 1 V �T1 A ® VICINITY SKETCH Acceptance of a Parcel of Land Along Belmont Road from Par 5 Development Group, LLC 1hsst&fiF4d w ty Departni-ent of Utilhies M S & J REALITY, INC. DB 10262, PG 747 GPIN# 76969031600000 lb # 6201 '& 497' TO THE WEST LINE OF TURNER ROAD FULL GOSPEL TABERNACLE TRUSTEE DB 2608, PG 548 GPIN# 769689356500000 #6215 , FULL GOSPEL TABERNACLE TRUSTEE DB 1749, PG 1420 GPIN# 769768618000000 # 4500 S 163, 70 $6 0 _za W PAR5 DEVELOPMENT GROUP, LLC DB 11220, PG 963 GPIN# 769689339200000 — # 6213 PBARIDEEM A DI� CA 5756 SQ.PT. 0.192 ACHE -61 1 SELtAONT ROAD -- ROUTE 651 — VAIRIIABLE WIDTH Q/ 15.76' Ell 1� 13 cr 0 00, Qf cl) 0 N'o co V- P, co a to 30' C /L DB 1387,OG 416 NOTES: D8 13B6, PG 49 1) THIS PLAT REPRESENTS A CURRENT FIELD SURVEY. 2) EASEMENTS MAY EXIST THAT ARE NOT SHOWN. 3) NO CEMETERIES WERE OBSERVED WHILE PERFORMING A PERIMETER SURVEY PLAT SHOWING 0. 132 ACRE PARCEL OF IAND LYING ON THE SOUTH LINE OF BELMONT ROAD STATE ROUTE 651 DALE DISTRICT * CHESTERFIELD COUNTY, VIRGINIA JL SURVEYING, LLC. 0 365 DEEP CREEK ROAD CREWE, VIRGINIA 23930 (434) 645-7960 (888) 504-5252 Fax 4/19/16 jbmtlavelte@yahoo.com 9 Jeffrey S, LaVe�e 0 100 200 300 0 Die. No. r! I DATE: APRIL 19, 2016 SCALE. 1" =100' v A, CD L6 /N-36 0 0 249 Lij E: 1 lZ76 949( pcrcoo 18, S 18.22 S 497' TO THE WEST LINE OF TURNER ROAD FULL GOSPEL TABERNACLE TRUSTEE DB 2608, PG 548 GPIN# 769689356500000 #6215 , FULL GOSPEL TABERNACLE TRUSTEE DB 1749, PG 1420 GPIN# 769768618000000 # 4500 S 163, 70 $6 0 _za W PAR5 DEVELOPMENT GROUP, LLC DB 11220, PG 963 GPIN# 769689339200000 — # 6213 PBARIDEEM A DI� CA 5756 SQ.PT. 0.192 ACHE -61 1 SELtAONT ROAD -- ROUTE 651 — VAIRIIABLE WIDTH Q/ 15.76' Ell 1� 13 cr 0 00, Qf cl) 0 N'o co V- P, co a to 30' C /L DB 1387,OG 416 NOTES: D8 13B6, PG 49 1) THIS PLAT REPRESENTS A CURRENT FIELD SURVEY. 2) EASEMENTS MAY EXIST THAT ARE NOT SHOWN. 3) NO CEMETERIES WERE OBSERVED WHILE PERFORMING A PERIMETER SURVEY PLAT SHOWING 0. 132 ACRE PARCEL OF IAND LYING ON THE SOUTH LINE OF BELMONT ROAD STATE ROUTE 651 DALE DISTRICT * CHESTERFIELD COUNTY, VIRGINIA JL SURVEYING, LLC. 0 365 DEEP CREEK ROAD CREWE, VIRGINIA 23930 (434) 645-7960 (888) 504-5252 Fax 4/19/16 jbmtlavelte@yahoo.com 9 Jeffrey S, LaVe�e 0 100 200 300 0 Die. No. r! I DATE: APRIL 19, 2016 SCALE. 1" =100' CHESTERFIELD BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 1 of I AGENDA , .. Meeting Date: September 28, 2016 Item Number: 8.C.11.c. Acceptance of a Parcel of Land Along Suncrest Drive from Wen Virginia, LLC Accept the conveyance of a parcel of Mand containing 0.033 acres along Suncrest Drive from Wen Virginia, LLC, and authorize the County Administrator to execute the deed. Staff requests that the Board of Supervisors accept the conveyance of a parcel of land containing 0.033 acres along Suncrest Drive from Wen Virginia, LLC. This dedication is for sidewalk improvements in conjunction with the development of the Rockwood Wendy's. Approval is recommended. District: Clover Hill Preparer: John W. Harmon Title: Real PropertV Manager __A Attachments- Yes El No 0 Acceptance of a Parcel of Land Along Suncrest Drive from Wen Virginia, LLC 1A % r�G."63 Acre Dedi c i f or Suncrest Dri �v vv� IX ChestEffield 'County DepeTtmLrt of Utilfties I N",Ih -15F E �7 t�! 00011 Z" Z, 60 0 a IRON ROD OR OTHER SUITABLE MONUMENT TO BE SET AT FUTURE DATE 3524 SUNCREST DR. ✓&W RENTALS LLC D.B. 8742, PG. 71 PARCEL ID 747685469400000 S69' 00' 53"W 5.06 N:336 E:117647565.85907.20 0.033 ACRES ® TO BE DEDICATED lQ, 5y� �9 5.00' N:3685833.21 !!! El 1747581.28 l 20' SMWBMP ACCESS EASEMENT N T 45'99'E c m n ®' 73 9 roovbcpm NiT 14' 07"W 3�.99_,,.,.--"� m til -.l rO-i 26.41..1 5l, 24'°W � N12' 14' D7"W 6.41 6.59 20.00--^"11 AN my g `'1 _ vmcmio in : 577 45' 53"N! 33.44 u am��ym 1 r Sit' 14' 07"E l 90400 HULL STREET RD.rae9. o6 ,.A WEN �/lRG1NL4, LLC / D.B. 11057, PG. 753 - MI ,' PARCEL ID 747685517500000 1.200 tCONTAINING RES- � � 1 l a p N,r 1 r 'g VARIABLE WIDTH , a INN SWMBMP EASEMENT l t S � ` N:3685650.98 1 1 E11747620.80 \ 1 r� Rq, N26' 39' dj 39.14 49,53 l , t N:3685646.60 57i ?Ogsr� 512" 14' E:11747560.79 �3•P,Pe 26.66 `` llll 39' 01"W N3° 3 24.45 �romc�c w�aw�F - s68. 58' - m 16s 5.06 U�n 0 ocs'� m ' � go N:3685624.92 24' SEWER AND WATER EJaSEMENT �„/ / - E:11747525.45 � o �o D.B. 7762, PG. 1091 1.74' / 5 53� SIDEWALK 568 EASEMENT X49' ST P�8185 OVA PG. 453 98' 433, PG 0.8' COUNTY SITE #16PRO153 COUNTY PROJECT 915-0202 0.033 ACRES IL EASEMENT DEDICATION °''� G-7 6 GEORGE L. ? PLAT FOR"=2e YPELER III Y 10400 MIDLOTHIAN unsEa --sv. Li.,No. 209s TURNPIKE aw Z 8-9-2016 CLOVER HILL DISTRICT CHESTERFIELD CO, VA C,7ND SURVF�O� •_NYFELER ASSOCIATES 619 W GARY ST. RICHMOND, VA 23270 o r<: &9 2016 O6°E 07"E 9' WE 504277-4731 vvrwn-yC lerass�ciaMs.mm 13"W w"CHESTERFIELD BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 1 of 1 AGENDA Meeting Date: September 28, 2016 Item ilumber: 8.C.12. Request Permission to Install a Private Water Service Within a Private Easement to Serve a Proposed Business on East Hundred Road • �' 1: . 1 tl 41 County Administrator Board Action eguested:`N p � Grant Torsten E. Peterson, Jr., Trustee of Kingston Four Trust Group permission install a private water service within a private easement to serve a proposed business on East Hundred Road, and authorize the County Administrator to execute the water connection agreement. Torsten E. Peterson, Jr., Trustee of Kingston Four Trust Group has requested permission to install a private water service within a private easement to serve Property on East Hundred Road. This request has been reviewed by the Utilities Department. Approval is recommended. District: Bermuda Preparer: John W. Harmon Title: Real Pr Attachments: Yes ❑ No VICINITY SKETCH Request Permission to Install a Private Water Service Within a Private Easement to serve a Proposed Business on East Hundred Road LN ;< n7 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . REQUEST PERMISSION"TO-, INSTALL. A PROPOSED VVATE SERVICE -ZQJ IC N--SteTfisld Cru rt.y DspartmErt of Util bes N• 3652!9.69-\ E- 11819699 15 £XSTING `7 15' SAN/TARY SEIfR EASEMENT D.B. 2216 P& 563 J- /0.9. _ R B. 79 PGS. 1-6 CP/N.• 8 7 965254 750 000 0 r rt MACS RETAIL, LLC Lr O B. 11090, PG. 545 e 707 BERMUDA HUNDRED RD. S 12;3855" W 297.01' r GP/N.• 81965>4.�8800000 MCOONALD'S CORRORWION( r 2219 PC 6 X/NGST0N 4 1 F I r EXISTING r r PERPETUAL r NON-EXCLUS/!iE INGRESS & EGRESS EASEMENT -4 OB. 27 -._ A35. L 16 YAIyABLE Gf/7cT 697 5 "5Y?,5' W 6%fig5'� 1..04' dg`13.. S 6'P* � , rN. 36520.9922 4S 1SL°�. � EYY21986.5p6 REi1 WI OER OF f ¢951 aq e 77' SAP✓ITARY SE*FR EASEMENT L'1 Ip P. LL 76 PGS'. 7-6 / f If 16' SANITARY -5-r#CR EAS ENT. f f 4, 730 Sr vhf f� N 772710' W(�/y, 6196517A87LI011GY7 )WSR71 E. "TIT&M .87., IMS/71, I f t7 ,47h`GiTldV FGYY9 T,?(1ST G�O.UA f I 73J BEiY4wx MN12 W Ad i I 10' WATERLINE f / EASEMENT 1848 S . (PRIYA)E� BY SEPERATE 7 L 6 / V{ A.,-- 365x&49 A b FUTURE E 1181970.483 L15 F UNE k '1�/� P((F ��_ \\k 15 fii X14 I L16 EX/SMO L7Q .il26'.; PG. ?36 � EX/S77NG DB 8137, M. 909 SYWAFMP EASEMENT EX/STING B. 2859, PG 638 W -R O E,'4s-, ✓ENT O.B. 1721, PG. 690 \ r Q Q 0 h Q 5 N.- 3651770.. 46 F. 11879867.26 WATER EASEMENT (PUBLlCf 104 SF /V.. ..3651!60 84 4 11819864, 53 L/NE TABLE Lr A / LENG L7 S 12;3855" W 297.01' E145T hVIO ZZ ROAL) N 5727725' W 16.00' L3 N ,!2:3855" E 294.25 L4 S 67W95'1- 7Y1835'E15 PLA T SHOMIV6G A Z5 N 74 2.9 40' W 10, 00' L6 N 152020" E 1000' L7 s 74 229 40" E 1000' Lb' S 155020" W 1000' L9 N 7427940" W 87.23' 110 S 5320:32' W 7464' I'll N 7727'10' W 22.37' 112 N 12:3250" E 10.00' L 13 S 7,77,710"F 17.80' Z14 N 5320:32' E 75.19' 115 S 7477940'E 92 Y6' L16 S 155020" W 1000' 16 YAIyABLE Gf/7cT 697 5 "5Y?,5' W 6%fig5'� 1..04' dg`13.. S 6'P* � , rN. 36520.9922 4S 1SL°�. � EYY21986.5p6 REi1 WI OER OF f ¢951 aq e 77' SAP✓ITARY SE*FR EASEMENT L'1 Ip P. LL 76 PGS'. 7-6 / f If 16' SANITARY -5-r#CR EAS ENT. f f 4, 730 Sr vhf f� N 772710' W(�/y, 6196517A87LI011GY7 )WSR71 E. "TIT&M .87., IMS/71, I f t7 ,47h`GiTldV FGYY9 T,?(1ST G�O.UA f I 73J BEiY4wx MN12 W Ad i I 10' WATERLINE f / EASEMENT 1848 S . (PRIYA)E� BY SEPERATE 7 L 6 / V{ A.,-- 365x&49 A b FUTURE E 1181970.483 L15 F UNE k '1�/� P((F ��_ \\k 15 fii X14 I L16 EX/SMO L7Q .il26'.; PG. ?36 � EX/S77NG DB 8137, M. 909 SYWAFMP EASEMENT EX/STING B. 2859, PG 638 W -R O E,'4s-, ✓ENT O.B. 1721, PG. 690 \ r Q Q 0 h Q 5 N.- 3651770.. 46 F. 11879867.26 WATER EASEMENT (PUBLlCf 104 SF /V.. ..3651!60 84 4 11819864, 53 Elf, M 2214 1578/CT, Ch'r ZZ, C!?ll/^V`TY, b4,lFC/N�,4 THIS SURVEY IS SUB -,E -Cr TO ANY EASEMENTS OF RECORD ANO OTHER PER77NEY7- FACTS WHYCH A F/TcE SEARCH MIGHT DISCLOSE Op - RONALD L. LANG Lia No. 003004 Z ` CO. S/7zZ7 PF0112 a as 180 23854' N• 365166233 E. 7>91956T.70. N 772714' W �} r 5 E145T hVIO ZZ ROAL) STATE ROUTE" 10 VAR/ABLE AWY RZW (PUBLIC) 17.8. 1706, PG. 221 PLA T SHOMIV6G A i0' IVA TE -/F LANE EASE��1E/VT �i�R/ilA Tom% A 10;rlO' HIATEP, EASE�/ENT �'i�l/BL/C,� & ' SAtU/T,-PY SE✓iER EASE1�tE/VT (/DM6Z1C) ACPOSS 6;� W. 91. 61;f74x',7,120o%0 Elf, M 2214 1578/CT, Ch'r ZZ, C!?ll/^V`TY, b4,lFC/N�,4 THIS SURVEY IS SUB -,E -Cr TO ANY EASEMENTS OF RECORD ANO OTHER PER77NEY7- FACTS WHYCH A F/TcE SEARCH MIGHT DISCLOSE Op - RONALD L. LANG Lia No. 003004 Z ` CO. S/7zZ7 PF0112 a as 180 CHESTERFIELD zBOARD OF SUPERVISORSPage 1o1 AGENDA Meeting Date: September 28, 2016 Item Number: 8.C.13. Award of Construction Contract for County Project #13-0280, Ashton Creek, Johnson Creek and Beechwood Sewer Rehabilitation The Board of Supervisors is requested to alhorize the Director of Purchasing to award the construction contract to Sak Construction, LLC, in the amount of $1,165,452.50, and execute all necessary change orders up to the full amount budgeted for the Ashton Creek, Johnson Creek and Beechwood Sewer Rehabilitation project. This project consists of the lining of approximately 462 linear feet of fl- inch, 382 linear feet of 18 -inch, 1,715 linear feet of 36 -inch and 1,089 linear feet of 42 -inch existing sanitary sewer. Staff received a total of five bids ranging from $1,165,452.50 to $2,568,050.05. The lowest responsive bid was from Sak Construction LLC, in the amount of $1,165,452.50. The County's engineering consultant, AECOM, has evaluated the bids and recommends award of the contract to Sak Construction LLC, the lowest responsive bidder. Funds for this project are available in the current CIP. District: Bermuda and Dale Preparer: George Hayes, P.E. Title: Director of Utilities Preparer: Allan Carmody Title: Director of Budqet and Manaq��ment ttac ents: Yes N� # ,, k N ;; CHESTERFIELD _f SUPERVISORS Page 1 of 2 " AGENDA Meeti r - ,. . , Lease of Property for Fire and Emergency Medical Services Station 5 Approve a lease with Forest View Rescue Squad for 0.238 acres of land, more or less, with improvements, at 13420 Midlothian Turnpike for Fire and EMS Station 5 and authorize the County Administrator to execute the lease. Staff recommends the Board of Supervisors approve a ten year lease with Forest View Rescue Squad to lease 0.238 acres of land, more or less, with improvements, at 13420 Midlothian Turnpike for Fire and EMS Station 5. Since 1977, the Chesterfield County Fire and EMS Department has been providing fire and Emergency Medical Service (EMS) to the Midlothian area from this station with career staff and apparatus 24 hours per day, 365 days per year. The property was owned by the Midlothian Volunteer Fire Department which disbanded in 2015 and deeded the property to the Forest View Rescue Squad in July 2016. The Fire and EMS Department has worked with county staff and Forest View Rescue Squad in the development of a lease that provides for the co -location of Forest View Rescue Squad and Chesterfield Fire and EMS. .!Teparer: Allan M. CarmodV Title: Director, Budget and Management Attachments- Yes ❑ No # CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 2 of I AGENDA The term of the lease is for ten years with four five-year renewal terms. This lease may be terminated by Forest View with 36 months advance written notice to the county and by the county with 12 months advance written notice to Forest View. Rent will be one dollar per year and the county will pay for all utilities and routine maintenance. The lease is subject to appropriation of funding for rent and operation of the station. Approval of this lease will guarantee the continuation of fire and EMS service to the citizens of the area. Funding for rent, utilities, and routine maintenance for Station 5 are appropriated and available within the FY2017 Fire and EMS operating budget. Approval is recommended. (Strict: Midlothian ImMmmacela ll;lqplll��lll 1 q�millll��llllq 11 i �� I H 1. SYCAMf 11 -1 2. SYCAMIK 0 -:-VtLLAGE FIN NA w F1 r r: Frarl i 1,; 4471 Ra RE VILLAGE DR RE VILLAGE TER RIDGE DR ')"ATE DR 7.NCL N Chesteffield County Right of Way, Office w F- 3e- ptember 9.2'016 I fna, - 2FS --,7 i,G I CHESTERFIELD COUNTY _A, BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page I of 1 AGENDA Meeting Date: September 28, 2016 Item Number: 8.C.15. Request to Quitclaim a Sixteen -Foot Water Easement and a Portion of a Variable Width Sight Distance Easement Across Property of BBHunt, LLC Authorize the Chairman of the BoarA, of Supervisors and the County Administrator to execute a quitclaim deed to vacate a 16 -foot water easement and a portion of a variable width sight distance easement across property of BBHunt, LLC. BBHunt, LLC has requested the vacation of a 16 -foot water easement and a portion of a variable width sight distance easement across its property as shown on the attached plat. This request has been reviewed by county staff and VDOT. A new water easement will be dedicated and a new water line will be constructed. Approval is recommended. District: Midlothian Preparer: John W. Harmon Title: Real Property Manager �_ I Attachments. Yes No VICINITY SKETCH Request to Quitclaim a Sixteen -Foot Water Easement and a Portion of a Variable With Sight Distance Easement Across Property of BBHunt, LLC T1 KE REOUEST TO QUITCLAIM y 0 A 16'WATER EASEMENT PORTION OF A VARIABLE VVDTH SIGHT DISTANCE MARTItV EASEMENT wo Cp 0 T R OOD C4 U// LEE crj C -T /A ii E Chestuffeld County DepaftmEnt Df UtRiss w 4 16 P,7 ',1P I o LE GORDON DRIVE PUBLIC -VARIABLE WIDTH R/W DB.10334 PG,28, PB.220 PGG,,5^^-- N=3707757.90 E=11725880,58 N �o .A d� cro _ (31.84') Cy® BBHUNT, LLC GPIN 7267-07-2550 tiG1 DB11147 PG251 PB.236 PG.87 300 CHARTER COLONY PKWY w EX, VARIABLE WIDTH SIGHT DISTANCE EASEMENT c DB.10655 PG.320 N=3707818.89 E=11726197.83 ORTION OF £X. VARIABLE WIDTH SIGHT DISTANCE EASEMENT DB,10655 PG.320 (0.059 AC TO BE QUITCLAIMED) - N=3707786.06 E=1172641229 r� ct N68'35'35'E a" h S68°59'58'E ' oC N85°06'03'W 6017' L4 N79°50'12'W (32.85') L5 WIDTH SIGHT 114.44' h S13'42'42'W Lg L7 6' WATER 16.00' m = EASEMENT r L6 L9 23 PG,513 85,38' 0AC TO BE 88.36' ri - N=3707786.06 E=1172641229 r� ct N68'35'35'E 2 L2 S68°59'58'E 72.96' L3 N85°06'03'W 6017' L4 N79°50'12'W EX, VARIABLE L5 WIDTH SIGHT 114.44' DISTANCE S13'42'42'W EASEMENT L7 DB.10655 PG.320 16.00' WILLIAM A1579 WITZ 9 l ic. N N,A.D. 83 ..� CHARTER (E&A LLC) GPIN 7267-08-4225 DB,6524 P&936 PB,236 PG,87 200 CHARTER COLONY PKWY N=3707836.52 E=11726244,53 P.O.B, #1 #2 (CO. PROJ. #15-0339) NOTES: RO.B. = POINT OF BEGINING N,T,S. = NOT TO SCALE LINE BEARING DISTANCE Ll N68'35'35'E 85.05' L2 S68°59'58'E 72.96' L3 N85°06'03'W 6017' L4 N79°50'12'W 156,97' L5 N89'27'03'E 114.44' L6 S13'42'42'W 31,50' L7 N76°17'18'W 16.00' L8 N13°42'42'E 31.50' L9 S69'27'03'W 85,38' L10 S80°03'41'W 88.36' Lli N68°59'58'W 144.22' NUMBER DELTA RADIUS ILENGTH CHORD BRG ICHORD TANGENT Cl 37°21'18' 48.50' 31.62' N65*58'22'E 31.06' 16,40' C2 16'03'26' 319.50' 89.54' N76'37'18'E 89.25' 45,07' C3 11°37'17' 280,50' 56,89' N74°24'13'E 56,80' 28.54' C4 34°09'50' 18.50' 11.03' N65'15'18'E 10,87' 5.68' C5 121-22'29-1283.50' 105,76' S86°58'33'E 105,15' 53,50' PLAT OF PDRTION OF EXISTING SIGHT DISTANCE EASEMENT & EXISTING 16' WATER EASEMENT ON GPIN 7267-07-2550 FDR QUITCLAIM DEED TO BBHUNT, LLC MIDLOTHIAN DISTRICT CHESTERFIELD COUNTY, VIRGINIA YOUIVGBLOOD, TYLER & ASSOCIATES, P. C. CIVIL ENGINEERS, PLANNERS & LAND SURVEYORS 7309 HANOVER GREEN DRIVE P.O. BOX 517 MECHANICSVILLE, Vcz, 23111 ATEa AUGUST 9, 2016 SCALE, 1' = 60' BY. CHESTERFIELD BOARD OF SUPERVISORSPage 1 of AGENDA�Kc MeetingSeptember fNumber: Transfer $5,000 from the Matoaca District Improvement Fund to the Chesterfield County Department of Parks and Recreation to Pay Referee Fees for Co -Sponsored, Qualified Athletic Programs Located Within CDBG-Eligible Areas • •:ITOT111TIt =_1 Transfer $5,000 from the Matoaca District ',Improvement Fund to the Chesterfield County Department of Parks and Recreation to pay referee fees for co-sponsored, qualified athletic programs located within CDBG-eligible areas. Chairman Elswick has requested the Board to transfer $5,000 from the Matoaca District Improvement Fund to the Chesterfield County Department of Parks and Recreation to pay football referees for youth football games for co-sponsored youth athletic programs operating within CDBG-eligible portions of the County. Parks and Recreation will manage the funds and make payments to the referees through the Chesterfield Quarterback League for co-sponsored youth athletic programs that are located in CDBG eligible areas and satisfy need - based criteria established by the Department. Parks and Recreation receives requests on occasion from private recreation associations for public funding. While the County cannot donate to private _•� _ `, ** Director,•a-t and Management 04 .•- - 1t •_f• CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORSPage 2 of AGENDA organizations, the County can pay operational costs for co-sponsored recreational programs that are operated within the County and which benefit Chesterfield residents generally. Since this is a transfer of funds to a County department for a co-sponsored recreational program which will benefit County residents, it is a permissible use of District Improvement Funds. For information regarding available balances in the District Improvement Fund accounts, please reference the District Improvement Fund Report. APPLICATION This application must be completed and signed before the County can consider request for funding with District Improvement Funds. Completing and signing this form does not mean that you will receive funding orthat the County can legally consider your request. Virginia |avv places substantial restrictions on the authority of the County to give public funds, such as District Improvement Funds, to private persons or organizations and these restrictions may preclude the County's Board of Supervisors from even considering your request. 1. What is the name of the applicant (person or Ettrick Youth Sports Association organization) making this funding request? 2. If an organization is the applicant, what is the The Ettrick Youth Sports Association (EYSA) is a nature and purpose of the organization? 501(c)(3) nonprofit youth sports organization located in Chesterfield County, Virginia supporting (Attach organization's most recent articles of the youth andfamilies of Ettrick, VA. EYSA provides incorporation and/or bylaws to application.) football, basketball, baseball, and cheerleading for youth ages 5-13 years of age 3. What is the amount of funding you are seeking? $5000.00 4. Describe in detail the funding request and how The funding will be spent on referee fees for Ettrick the money, if approved, will be spent. Youth Sports Association football program through the Chesterfield Quarterback League. 5. Is any Chesterfield County Department involved in the project, event or program for which you Yes are seeking funds? Provide name of other department Chesterfield Parks and Recreation 6. If this request for funding will not fully fund your activity or program, what other individual Will receive funding through fundraising, or organization will provide the remainder of concessi . sons and players fees to supplement. the funding? 01, 7. If the applicant is an organization, answer the following Is the organization a corporation No - corporation Mailing Address Fax Number E -Mail Address Signature of the applicant — If you are signing on behalf of an organization you must be the president, vice-president, chairman/director or vice-chairman. ®ate Received: t Districts -fax jackie.robinson1@yahoo.com - email Ettrick Youth Sports Association Name of A licant i Presigent — Title !f signing on behalf of organization Jack Robinson - printed name 8/9/16 - date Forma updated 2/7/2023 , ax en�o� CHESTERFIELD TY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 1 of 1 1749AGENDA =Ling Date: September 28, 2016 Item ilumber: 8.C.16.b. Transfer of $1,000 in Matoaca District Improvement Funds to the Chesterfield County School Board to Purchase Supplies and Equipment for the Matoaca Middle School MoID Program County Administrator: Board Action Requested:; Transfer of $1,000 in Matoaca District Improvement Funds to the Chesterfield County School Board to purchase supplies and equipment to establish a school- based business as part of the Matoaca Middle School MoID program. Chairman Elswick has requested that the Board transfer $1,000 in Matoaca District Improvement Funds to the Chesterfield County School Board for the purchase of supplies and equipment to establish a school-based business for the Matoaca Middle School MoID program. The program for children with moderate intellectual disabilities (MoID) in grades 6-8 plans to establish a school-based business known as Warrior Paper Works. Students will use recycled paper to create greeting and note cards which will be available for public purchase. The program will assist the children in becoming fully participating members of our community by teaching them life and business skills. All money earned from the sale of the products will be returned to the School Board to help fund the program. The Board can legally transfer public funds to the School Board to purchase supplies and equipment which will be owned by the School Board and used for public educational purposes. For information regarding available balances in the District Improvement Fund accounts, please reference the District Improvement Fund Report. Attachments: Yes Title: Director, Budget & Management 0425:97301.1 No # CHESTERFIELD BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 1 of AGENDA E. Meetinq Date., September 28, 2016 Item Number'. 8.C.17. Acceptance and Appropriation of Federal and State Revenue and Authorization to Create Three Full -Time and Two Part -Time Positions in the Victim/Witness Assistance Program The Board is requested to accept and appropriate $333,300 in federal and state revenue and authorize the creation of three (3) full-time positions and two (2) part-time positions in the Victim/Witness Assistance Program. �MMMM•�� In 2015, Congress increased the federal distribution cap for FY2017 Victims of Crime Act (VOCA) funding from $745 million to $2.361 billion annually. Virginia's additional annual allocation has more than quadrupled. VOCA funding was established in 1984 to fund victim services through fines and fees levied against federal criminal offenders. Use of VOCA funding is restricted to costs for direct services to victims of crime and costs/services to ensure that quality direct services are provided. The Chesterfield County Victim Witness Assistance Program (V/WAP) has received an additional allocation of $333,300 for FY2017 in federal and state funds. Appropriation of these funds will allow the V/WAP to create three (3) full-time case manager positions, two (2) part-time customer service positions, and allow for the purchase of office equipment and supplies for the additional employees. 1111H MIM • T j - - •• ' -l•. - •INUMMMI MIM M-011IRM FILM CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 2 of AGENDA These additional funds and positions will fill a service gap in a program that has experienced a consistently high caseload volume, which has maxed out programmatic resources for more than a decade. During each of the prior five fiscal years, caseloads have run between 250 and 300 cases per full-time employee, well above the state recommendation of 200 cases per full-time employee. The additional resources will allow the V/WAP to purposefully expand services to victims of previously underserved crime types, such as robbery and burglary, thereby meeting service standards. In addition, the V/WAP was recently commended by the Virginia Department of Criminal Justice Services for its efforts to assist other organizations, aiding in the re -certification of Chesterfield County as a Certified Crime Prevention Community. Approval of these additional funds and positions will allow the V/WAP to continue these efforts. The additional funding does not have a local match requirement. It is anticipated that this state and federal funding will be made available on a recurring basis, and the actions requested in this item are contingent upon ongoing funding. If outside resources are eliminated, the five positions and the required funding will be reevaluated during a future budget process. IS A BOARD . .. , A-. 4GEVD4 Meeting Date: September 28, 2016 Item Number: 8.C.18. Authorize Receipt and Appropriation of United States Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Assistance FY2016 Justice Assistance Grant Funds and Appropriation of Asset Forfeiture Funds to Purchase a New Case Management Software System County Administrator:° Board Action Requested: The Board of Supervisors is requested to authorize the receipt and appropriation of $55,163 in US Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Assistance FY2016 Justice Assistance Grant and to Appropriate up to $105,000 in Asset Forfeiture Funds to purchase and install a new case management software system The Commonwealth Attorney's office was recently notified a US Department of Justice grant in the amount of $55,163 to assist with the procurement, installation, and training for a new case management software system had been awarded to the County. The grant requires acceptance by the local governing body in addition to appropriation of the grant funds. Replacement of the current system has been planned for several years. The current system requires a significant amount of duplicated manual data entry and lacks reporting capabilities. Specifications for the new system would include that it be cloud -based and have extensive scanning and reporting capability. If successful, the new system would eliminate the need for manual entry completely, saving countless man-hours and eliminating data entry errors. CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 2 of AGENDA I The total estimated cost to procure the software, cover the cost of modifications that will be required to meet all of the needs of the Commonwealth Attorney's office, and allow for staff training is estimated to be approximately $160,000. Purchase of the system will follow county procurement procedures. After considering grant funds of $55,163, the balance needed up to $105,000 is available in asset forfeiture funds previously received by the Commonwealth Attorney's office. Staff requests acceptance of the grant and appropriation of funds to cover all associated costs. No local funds will be required. CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 1 of 1 AGENDA Meetina Date: SeDtember 28.2016 Item Number: 8.C.19. Comprehensive Services Act (CSA) Year -End Funding Adjustment Appropriate an $890,000 (FY16) year-end adjustment from the Comprehensive Services Act fund. The Board of Supervisors is requested to appropriate $890,000 in CSA fund balance to cover program expenses incurred during FY2016 associated with an increased demand for services and the resulting local match. This increase in demand has occurred statewide and is not exclusive to Chesterfield. The requested appropriation is being made from existing funds on hand in the CSA fund, which are held for these types of instances. Accordingly, this action will have no effect on the general fund. •♦ y Title: Dire Attachments: Yes No CHESTERFIELD GBOARD OF SUPERVISORSPage 1 of 1 AGENDA �aarx�4 Meetinq Date: September 28, 2016 Item Number: 8.C.20. Approval to Extend the Lease of Property at Centre Court for Use by the Economic Development Department County Administrator: , dye Board Action Requested: Approve addendum to extend the lease with Family Holdings, L.C. for office space at Centre Court for the Economic Development Department. • '• Since 1997, the County has leased space at Centre Court for use by the Economic Development Department. The County currently leases 4,741 square feet at a rent of $21.45 per square foot, subject to a 3 percent annual escalator. The current term expires September 30, 2016. Economic Development staff has negotiated a three year extension of the lease for $17.00 per square foot with a 3 percent annual escalation. In addition, the landlord will make certain improvements including replacement of floor tiles and sink in the break room, install a new refrigerator with ice maker, repair counter tops and the fountain in the retention pond and test for and remove any mold found in the leased space. The new term will expire on September 30, 2019. Funds for the current year are already appropriated in the operating budget. Future years' rent payments are subject to annual appropriation by the Board. Approval is recommended. District: Dale Preparer: John W. Harmon Title: Real Property Manager _• -••, •• Director Attachments: Yes No # " i'RGkNi.A,� CHESTERFIELD COUNT BOARD OF SUPERVISORI'L AGENDA Meeting Date: September 28, 2016 Item Number: 8.D. Report on County -School Related Committees The Board is requested to approve the recommendations noted in the report. Attached is a report from the county administrator and superintendent of schools addressing their review and recommendations for the following committees: • Capital Construction Goals and Accountability Committee (CCGAC) • County and Schools Joint Sub -Committee on Employee Benefits (CSJSEB) • Budget and Audit Committee (BAC) • Joint Board of Supervisors -School Board Liaison Committee (JBSSBLC) This report was presented to the Budget and Audit Committee and the Capital Construction Goals and Accountability Committee last week. Preparer Dr. Joseph P. Case Title: County Administrata Attachments: Yes IST® Chesterfield County, Virginia CoUNTY Joseph P. Casey, Ph.D., County Administrator J! j W 0 0 James Lane, Ph.D., Superintendent of Schools T. co 1749 TO: Budget and Audit Committee, Capital Construction and Government Accountability Committee, School Liaison Committee, Compensation and Benefits Committee FROM: Dr. Joseph P. Casey, County Administrator - Dr. James Lane, Superintendent of Schools DATE: September 21, 2016 SUBJECT: Review of County -School Related Committees The County Administrator and Superintendent of Schools were asked by our respective Boards to review the committees for which our board members share committee roles. There are currently four committees comprised of Board of Supervisors and School Board members as follows (current website committee profiles referenced in appendices; including listing of all committee members): ® Capital Construction Goals and Accountability Committee (CCGAC) — Appendix A ® County and Schools Joint Sub -Committee on Employee Benefits (CSJSEB)— Appendix B ® Budget and Audit Committee (BAC) — Appendix C ® Joint Board of Supervisors -School Board Liaison Committee (JBSSBLC or "Liaison") — Appendix D Each of these committees requires the time and attention of elected officials, staff, citizens and .Ai* meda. As part of a "fresh 'look" to address potential redundancies, we were tasked with evaluating these committees and making recommendations. This review was designed to accomplish the following goals: Ensure that the transparency and engagement between media and citizens with their local government is further protected and where possible, improved upon Ensure that all committee meetings have substantive, productive and relevant agendas that mitigate overhead costs associated with committees and make citizen and media efforts to attend such open meetings more efficient ® Get feedback from committee members and regular staff attendees. Results of the Committees reported out to the Board of Supervisors, School Board and citizens. Therefore, the following are initial assessments and recommendations for each committee. V This committee of 12 members includes four elected officials, one planning commission member, three staff and four citizens (architect, chamber representative, and county and school representatives of the two Citizen Budget Advisory Committees (CBAC)). Other regular attendees include the County Administrator, Superintendent of Schools and approximately four other staff. The meeting cycle is the third Wednesday of every month. The CCGAC was created to bring additional focus upon certain matters (e.g., specific school capital projects) that may have otherwise consumed a traditional BAC agenda. When created in January 2015, its purpose was defined to "demonstrate transparency and accountability to the citizens, to ensure school projects (bond referendum) are aligned with the Comprehensive Plan, coordinated with neighborhood revitalization and compatible w/ existing development." Since its inception, many important tasks and subjects have been addressed with additional enhancements being made to transparency, performance and accountability. Examples include: Six bond referendum projects have been started, a capital projects management firm hired to oversee many of the high profile school capital projects and adoption of a prototype model of new elementary schools School Construction procurement responsibilities have transitioned from Schools to County as the County Purchasing Department provides such State Procurement Code compliant services now to all County and School projects To be more transparent, a website portal (Capital Project Status) is under development to track all major capital projects of the County and Schools with anticipation that such website will be publicly available by October I There will always be the need to further review certain projects and processes related to School and County capital projects with a committee. However, the stand-alone nature of such a committee with its focus just on Schools and the related improvements made since this committee was created warrant a fi-esh approach. Therefore, it is recommended that such future CCGAC agenda items be merged into the agenda of the BAC or Liaison Committee, as applicable. The BAC or Liaison Committee can address County and School capital projects of interest as well; including periodic reviews of the new Capital Projects Status website page. The current 2 efforts expended upon everyone, including citizens and media attendees, appear to be better served in their attending a more substantive BAC or Liaison Committee. For more detail on BAC or Liaison Committee and its enhanced scope, please refer to those committee sections of this report. Finally, in recognizing the value that the citizens have provided, it is recommended that three citizens not on the CBAC's be afforded the option to continue serving on either the County or School CBAC. The two CRACs should further focus on capital on a proactive manner and share a joint meeting strategy session annually. This committee of 4 members includes four elected officials. Other regular attendees include the County Administrator, County Budget Director, County HRM Director, Superintendent of Schools, Assistant Superintendent and approximately four additional staff. There is no formal meeting cycle, but generally meets quarterly. Finally, there has been speculation that the CCGAC has continued to an environment of less vendor interest in capital projects and/or higher vender bids. This may be from additional processes and related time for certain capital projects that vendors do not experience with peer localities elsewhere. However, this speculation has not been fully analyzed and would hopefully be a moot topic with fresh role and scope under BAC. If continued speculation were to arise, then further actions to appropriately investigate and audit this topic will be pursued. The topics primarily addressed by the CSJEB focus on healthcare contracts, related employer- employee benefit rates and other employee benefits. Inherently each of these topics is of a fiscal and administrative nature that could easily be accommodated by the BAC. The efforts expended upon everyone, including citizens and media attendees, to attend a brief committee meeting would be better served in their attending a more substantive BAC where the same topics could easily be addressed. For more detail on BAC and its enhanced scope, please refer to the BAC section of this report. . . . . . . . . . . This committee of two County elected officials and three County staff is complimented by the School attendees of two elected officials, the Superintendent of Schools and Assistant Superintendent. Other regular attendees include approximately five staff. There is no formal meeting cycle, but generally meets monthly. This committee has served the County and Schools very well over the years as the primary source for discussions for not just audit and budget topics. Because of the importance of audit - related topics to committee members, citizens and media, the accountability and independence of the Internal Audit Department and external audit contract is paramount to good governance in fact and appearance. Currently, the Internal Audit Director reports to the County Administrator and administratively to the Deputy County Administrator. It is proposed that this position report to the County Administrator and School Superintendent with year-end performance review feedback provided 3 directly from the elected officials via their representatives on this committee. This escalation of the Internal Auditor to having a more direct and accountable relationship directly to elected officials and to the respective chief administrative officers of County and Schools follows best practice concepts of the National Association of Local Government Auditors and other standard setting bodies for internal audit. As shown below: An important topic that appears to be under -represented at the committee level is the periodic review of technology systems and their deployment in furthering customer service, cost, efficient and transparent operations. An annual update would help ensure that our systems are current and meeting the needs of the employees and customers. Finally, to reflect such importance that audit and independence roles are with Chesterfield, and the breadth of financial matters in addition to budgeting, the committee should be renamed Audit and Finance Committee (AFC). This places the word "Audit" first and aligned with traditional Audit Committees of public and private sector institutions and also addresses the re -assigned agenda topics from the CCGAC and CSJBC through the broader title of "Finance." The committee should also formally incorporate the two School Board members as committee members. The committee is proposed to meet five times a year and an example future agenda for the 2017 calendar year recurring topics is as follows (other one-time topical items added as needed with additional meetings also added as needed): ® April: o Internal Audit Reports o Capital Projects Update o External Audit Contract Renewal -Selection ® June: o External Audit Pre -audit Overview o Current Fiscal Year -End Financial Projections o Fund Balance and Debt Policy Compliance Projection o Feedback to County Administrator and Superintendent of Schools on Performance Review of Internal Audit Director August: o Internal Audit Reports o Internal Audit Annual Report o Proposed Internal Audit Plan o Employee Benefits Update • October: o Internal Audit Reports o Capital Projects and Five -Year Plan Update o Financial Policies Update o Next Fiscal Year Budget Process Update o Investment Income and Tax Collection Update o Citizens Budget Advisory Committee Update (County and Schools) • November: o External Audit Post -audit Overview o Draft Prior Fiscal Year Comprehensive Annual Financial Report o Current Fiscal Year-end Financial Projections o Technology Systems Update • December -March: o As needed, related primarily to budget issues that may arise In order to ensure transparency and access to information for citizens, all presentations and reports will be available on the committee website portal and departmental portals as applicable and appropriate under State Code. Finally, as desired by the Schools to help illustrate leadership representation, it is recommended that the Vice -chair of the School Board serve on such committee as standing positions. This committee of 4 elected officials has regular attendees that include the County Administrator, County Budget Director, Superintendent of Schools, Assistant Superintendent and approximately four additional staff. There is no formal meeting cycle, but generally meets quarterly. The JBSSBLC functions well from the perspective of providing a forum outside of BAC to review opportunities for County and Schools to share information, develop strategies and initiatives, and work in a collaborative manner. For topics that have a high fiscal correlation (including capital projects and employee benefits), then such topics are better suited under the BAC. In order to make the committee name less cumbersome, it is recommended to shorten the name to a term that more identifies with the name that this committee is most referred to — "County -School Liaison Committee" (CSLQ. It is recommended that the CSLC meet two times/year and also as -needed. An example 2017 agenda for recurring topics is as follows: May: o State and Federal Legislative Impacts o Survey Results Review o Transparency and Engagement Update o Model Government Update 9 November: o School Performance Update o Collaborative and Consolidated Services Update o State Legislative Agenda Update o Emergency Preparedness Update In order to ensure transparency and access to information for citizens, all presentations and reports will be available on the committee website portal and departmental portals. Finally, as desired by the Schools to help illustrate leadership representation, it is recommended that the Chair of the School Board serve on such committee as standing positions. 1 KI I IN I VWPAMM! I MI-FAVATMIRRI I PROMIG) 1,11-3 6 ® Present this report to the next BAC in November and CCGAC on September 21, 2016, respectively, for further input and feedback (draft concepts of BAC to AFC and Internal Audit structure were discussed at September 19, 2016 meeting). ® If BAC and CCGAC committees provide positive feedback, then prepare the necessary agenda items of CCGAC and CBC into a new AFC Charter (formerly the BAC) with new defined scope of CSLC: o School Board Action: Future selection of respective committee members with consideration to having Vice -chair on AFC and Chair on CSLC as standing positions o Board of Super -visors Action: Board of Supervisor concurrence with new committee organization at September 28, 2016 meeting ® Further promote transparency efforts; including Capital Project Status website portal and other opportunities for citizens and media to have information We hope that this analysis and recommendations meets the respective goals from each of the committee leaders in better positioning the County, Schools, elected officials, staff, citizens and media for more productive, relevant, efficient use of time in addressing the substantive issues that are recurring or one-time. 7 11!m, Jim! Purpose: This Committee was created in 2015 to ensure that both the Board of Supervisors and the School Board demonstrate transparency and accountability to county residents whose funds are being expended for capital projects. Number of Members: 12 — including 2 members of the Board of Supervisors and 2 members of the School Board appointed by respective Chairmen; 1 Planning Commission member; 3 staff persons; 1 member of the County's Citizen Budget Advisory Committee; I member of Schools' Citizen Budget Advisory Committee; I member of the Chesterfield Chamber of Commerce; and I architect Comments: The Liaison Committee will communicate activities of the committee to other Board of Supervisors and School Board members. Term of Service: Serves at the pleasure of respective Chairmen Staff Contact: Allan Carmody - (804) 748-1600 Meeting Dates: Meets regularly as set by Board members. Meeting Location: To be determined Steve Elswick Leslie Haley Carrie Coyner Rob Thompson Dr. Edgar Wallin Mr. John Hilliard Ms. Barbara Mait Mr. Andy Scherzer Mr. Randy Holmes Mr. Allan Carmody Mr. Chris Sorensen Ms. Nita Mensia-Joseph W-� 61 Board •' Supervisors •• Board •'! Board Planning Commission County's CBAC representative Schools' CBAC representative Chesterfield Chamber representative Architect Staff Staff Staff Appendix B - County and Schools Joint Sub -Committee on Employee Benefits (Web9I Profile) Purpose: To assist the Board of Supervisors in fulfilling its oversight responsibilities for the Benefits Plans provided to County and Schools employees. Number of Members: 4 — 2 members of the Board of Supervisors and 2 members of the School Board appointed by the respective Chairmen annually. Comments: The Benefits Committee will communicate activities of the committee to other Board of Supervisors and School Board members. Term of Service: Serve at pleasure of respective Chairmen Staff Contact: Scott Zaremba — (804) 748-1143 Meeting Dates: As required Meeting Location: To be determined Steve Elswick Dorothy Jaeckle Carrie Coyner Rob Thompson ►. �11 WIM" -81ard ot Supervisors School Board School Board I Purpose: The Budget and Audit Committee's purpose is to assist the Board of Supervisors in fulfilling its oversight responsibilities for budgeting, financial reporting, internal control systems, and audit processes. Number of Members: Two members of the Board of Supervisors are appointed by the Board of Supervisors Chairman to serve with the County Administrator, Budget Director and Internal Audit Director on the Budget and Audit Committee. Comments: Additionally, the School Board Chairman appoints two members to represent Schools at Budget and Audit Committee meetings. Current appointees are Carrie Coyner and Javaid Siddiqi. Tenn of Service: Pleasure of the Chairman WETIMly �96 MI Meeting Dates: Meets as necessary Meeting Location: Lane B. Ramsey Administration Building Room 505 Street Address: 9901 Lori Road, Chesterfield VA 23832 "FUCUMTRUKOVIYOOT "I"IME111111:11 IF! I I i jii�� i g qj 1 ", I i � �jqqjlq Ik"Ill Steve Elswick Board of Supervisors Chris Winslow Board of Supervisors KIII =0011,7-337V MON Purpose: This Committee serves as a point of regular contact between the School Board and the Board of Supervisors. Two members of each Board serve on the Committee. Number of Members: 4 — 2 members of the Board of Supervisors and 2 members of the School Board appointed by respective Chairmen. Comments: The Liaison Committee will communicate activities of the committee to other Board of Supervisors and School Board members. Term of Service: Serves at the pleasure of respective Chairmen ff WKWOMWEIR Meeting Dates: Meets regularly as set by Board members. Meeting Location: To be determined i 1 nows si wa ".-m-renn Leslie Haley Board of Supervisors Dorothy Jaeckle Board of Supervisors Dianne Smith School Board John Erbach School Board 11 Purpose: The Committee assists the Board of Supervisors and School Board in fulfilling its oversight responsibilities for budgeting, financial reporting, internal control systems, and audit processes (internal and external). Included in this committee are focus areas of capital -projects, technology and employee benefit strategies. Example of agenda topics include: • Internal Audit Reports • Capital Projects and Five -Year Plan Update • External Audit Contract Renewal -Selection • Technology Systems Update • External Auditor Pre -audit Overview • Periodic Year -End Financial Projections • Fund Balance and Debt Policy Compliance Projections • Proposed Internal Audit Plan • Internal Audit Annual Report • Closed Session with Elected Officials to Provide Feedback for Performance Review of Internal Audit Director • Preliminary Year -End Financial Results • Employee Benefits Update • Financial Policies Update • External Audit Post -audit Overview • Draft Comprehensive Annual Financial Report • Next Fiscal Year Budget Process • Investment Income and Tax Collection Update • Citizens Budget Advisory Committee Update (County and Schools) Number of Members: 4 - Two members of the Board of Supervisors are appointed by the Board of Supervisors Chairman (including Board of Supervisors chairman) and two members of the School Board are appointed by the School Board Chairman (including School Board vice- chairman). Comments: The Committee will communicate activities of the committee to other Board of Supervisors and School Board members; including the posting of agenda, reports, presentations and minutes on the website for engagement with interested parties and transparency of meeting; as applicable and under State Code provisions. Term of Service: Serves at the pleasure of the respective Chairman Meeting Dates: Meets five times/year (April-, June, August, October and November) and other dates as deemed necessary by Committee. Meeting Location: Lane B. Ramsey Administration Building Room 502, 9901 Lori Road, Chesterfield VA 23832 (unless otherwise posted) 12 There is also a County -School Liaison Committee (CSLC) to address all non -audit and fiscal topics (see CSLC for father information) MNWOI� �19 Steve Elswick Board of Supervisors Chris Winslow Board of Supervisors Carrie Coyner School Board Javaid Siddiqi School Board Joseph Casey County Administrator James Lane School Superintendent Greg Akers Internal Audit Director Allan Carmody Budget Director Chris Sorensen Assistant School Superintendent Mary Martin Selby Human Resources Director IN Purpose: This Committee serves as a point of regular contact between the School Board and the Board of Supervisors. While the Audit and Finance Committee (AFC) also represents joint participation of County and School Board members (see AFC for further information), this Committee will focus on other topics of mutual interest. Examples include: • State and Federal Legislative Impacts • Survey Results • Transparency and Engagement • Model Government • School Performance • Collaborative and Consolidated Services • State Legislative Agenda • Emergency Preparedness Number of Members: 4 — 2 members of the Board of Supervisors (including Board of Supervisors vice-chairman) and 2 members of the School Board appointed by respective Chairmen (including School Board chairman). Comments: The Committee will communicate activities of the committee to other Board of Supervisors and School Board members; including the posting of agenda, reports, presentations and minutes on the website for engagement with interested parties and transparency of meeting; as applicable and under State Code provisions. Term of Service: Serves at the pleasure of respective Chairmen Staff Contact: Sarah Snead, Deputy County Administrator Meeting Dates: Meet in June and December, and as needed as determined by the Committee members. Meeting Location: Lane B. Ramsey Administration Building Room 502, 9901 Lori Road, Chesterfield VA 23832 (unless otherwise posted) IK$]MUVMMM Leslie Haley Dorothy Jaeckle Dianne Smith John Erbach 17 a a 0 M8 021 1/:ry1�L Board of Supervisors School Board School Board IWIM I Leal E-%31 1 Ird I In U-J,I,Lg 14 CHESTERFIELD f,BOARD OF SUPERVISORSPage 1 of AGENDA ^± lirl Date: September ,, Developer Water and Sewer Contracts The Board of Supervisors has authori�,,,ed the County Administrator to execute water and/or sewer contracts between County and Developer where there are no County funds involved. The report is submitted to Board members as information. pm��,Mre The following water and sewer contracts were executed by the County Administrator: 1. Contract Number: 04-00186 Project Name: Ashton Creek Business Center Pump Station and Force Main Phase 1 Location: 1600 Ashton Park Drive Developer: Goodrich Rover Trust Contractor: Castle Equipment Corporation Contract Amount: Wastewater Improvements - $ 407,916.00 District: Bermuda Preparer: Michael A. Nannery, P. E. Title: Assistant Director of Utilities Attachments: ❑ Yes No Summary of Information: ( ontinue ) 2. Contract Number: 07-0434 Project Name: Dunollie at the Highlands Location: 12638 Crathes Lane Developer: Touchstone II, LLC Contractor: BE Howerton Construction LLC Contract Amount: Water Improvements - District: 3. Contract Number: Project Name: Location: Developer: Contractor: Contract Amount: District: 4. Contract Number: Project Name: Location: Developer: Contractor: Contract Amount: District: Bermuda 08-0043 Centralia Station Section 1 10401 Centralia Station Smithland Company LLC Godsey & Son Inc. Water Improvements - Wastewater Improvements - Bermuda 08-0074 Autumn Grove Section B 6936 Autumn Point Drive Dean T. Patrick BTS Construction Company Inc. Water Improvements - Wastewater Improvements - Dale $ 124,777.00 $ 355,865.00 $ 508,450.00 $ 77,422.00 $ 36,500.00 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 3 of 6 AGENDA Summary of Information. ( ontinue ) 5. Contract Number: 08-0105 Project Name: Winterfield Park Sections 2, 3, & 4 Location: 1310 and 1320 Winterfield Road Developer: Rebkee Partners Winterfield, LLC Contractor: Richard L. Crowder Construction Co. Contract Amount: Water Improvements - $ 243,686.00 Wastewater Improvements - $ 201,220.00 District: Midlothian 6. Contract Number: 14-0251 Project Name: St. Ives Section 2 Location: 2200 N. Otterdale Road Developer: St. Ives LC Contractor: Richard L. Crowder Construction Co. Contract Amount: Water Improvements - $ 61,727.00 Wastewater Improvements - $ 32,722.00 District: Midlothian 7. Contract Number: 14-0276 Project Name: Watkins Centre Memory Care Location: 650 Watkins Centre Parkway Developer: Watkins Centre Memory Care, LLC Contractor: Engineering Design Technologies Contract Amount: Water Improvements - $ 73,791.00 Wastewater Improvements - $ 35,805.00 District: Midlothian dy F„re 'w4 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ROR Pg 4 of `. 6 AGENDA Sum GDA um ry of Information: (Continued) 8. Contract Number: 15-0087 Project Name: Aldi Inc - Iron Bridge Location: 11100 Iron Bridge Road Developer: Aldi (N.C.), LLC Contractor: F. G. Pruitt, Inc. Contract Amount: Water Improvements - $ 36,498.00 Wastewater Improvements - $ 8,257.00 District: Dale 9. Contract Number: 15-0104 Project Name: Midlothian Village Storage Location: 14316 Midlothian Turnpike Developer: Midlothian Self Storage, LLC Contractor: Imperial Design Builders, Inc. Contract Amount: Water Improvements - $ 30,300.00 Wastewater Improvements - $ 69,750.00 District: Midlothian 10. Contract Number: 15-0129 Project Name: Project Buzzard Location: 1700 Digital Drive Developer: Economic Development Authority of Chesterfield Contractor: George Nice & Sons, Inc. Contract Amount: Water Improvements - $ 184,249.00 Wastewater Improvements - $ 214,272.00 District: Bermuda CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 5 of 6 AGENDA Contract Amount: Water Improvements - $ 122,000.00 Wastewater Improvements - $ 136,000.00 District: 12. Contract Number: Project Name: Location: Developer: Contractor: Matoaca 15-0245 Harpers Mill SW Section 2 8451 Otterdale Road HMG Investments, LLC Richard L. Crowder Construction Co. Contract Amount: Water Improvements - $ 157,031.00 Wastewater Improvements - $ 244,053.00 District: 13. Contract Number: Project Name: Location: Developer: Contractor Matoaca 15-0307 Pamilla at Magnolia Green 17308 Hull Street Road 6801 Woolridge Road - Moseley LP Castle Equipment Corporation Contract Amount: Water Improvements - $ 224,515.00 Wastewater Improvements - $ 305,637.00 District: Matoaca CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 6 of 6 Developer: BB Hunt, LLC Contractor: Piedmont Construction Company Contract Amount: Water Improvements - $ 165,750.00 Wastewater Improvements - $ 188,630.00 District: Midlothian 15. Contract Number: 16-0011 Project Name: CVS Store 10992 Location: 17307 Hull Street Road Developer: Rebkee Partners Winterfield, LLC Contractor: East-West Construction, Inc. Contract Amount: Water Improvements - District: Matoaca $ 63,075.00 ., C;.s ,, CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD O SUPERVISORS AGENDA Meeting Date: September 28, 2016 Item Number: 9.113. Report of Planning Commission Substantial Accord Determination for Chesterfield County Public Schools (Case 17PD0115) to Permit a Public Elementary School in a Residential (R-7) District jffl��. ; County Administrator:ry Board Action Reguested: On September 20, 2016, the Planning Commission determined that the additional acreage to accommodate the proposed new elementary school (a replacement facility for the existing Enon Elementary School) is in substantial accord with the Comprehensive Plan, as per attached (Case 17PD0115). (AYES: Wallin, Freye, Jackson, Jones and Sloan). Staff recommends no action. State law provides that the Board may overrule the Planning Commission's determination or refer the matter back to the Planning Commission for an additional public hearing and decision. If the Board takes no action, the substantial accord determination will become final. Preparer: Kirkland A. Turner Title: Director of Planning Attachments: Yes No # Substantial accord determination to permit a public elementary school in a Residential (R'7) A new elementary school is planned. The new school facility would replace the existing Enon Elementary School, located at 2001 East Hundred Road. Additional acreage is being added to the existing school property to accommodate this school replacement, necessitating substantial accord determination. Notes: A. Conditions may beimposed. B. Revised Condition 2and Exhibit 8are located inAttachments 1and 2. The Planning Commission held a public hearing on this case at their meeting on September 20, 2016. Their determination is provided on the following page. In response to recent site layout changes for outdoor recreational uses, staff recommends a -evision to Condition 2 and the addition of Exhibit B. Providing aFIRST CHOICE community through excellence inpublic service Specifically, Condition 2 was revised to reduce the following setbacks: • Florence Avenue setback from 35'tol5' o Svvinnrnin8 pools to meet normal ordinance requirements • Northern property line (adjoining church property) setback from 35' to l{Y. Afence and modified buffer treatment would still be applied in these reduced setback areas to provide adequate separation and screening of the outdoor recreational uses from adjoining properties (Attachment 2, Exhibit B). While in conformance with nninirnunn Ordinance standards, these reduced setbacks will allow additional area on the request property to be used for outdoor recreational p|avfie|ds. The Commission's determination included the approval of Revised Condition 2(Attachment l). Staff continues to recommend approval of this request as outlined below. PLANNING APPROVAL COMMISSION (9/20/2016) | RECOMMEND APPROVAL • Satisfies the criteria of location, character and extent as STAFF specified in the Code of Virginia • Complies with Public Facilities Plan an element of the Comprehensive Plan • Ordinance and conditions minimize the possibility of any � adverse impact on area properties 2 17PD0115'2016SEP20-CPC-ADD 'i1 � � . � r .�� Note: The following conditions were recommended by both Staff and Planning Commission 1. Design District. Except where the requirements of the underlying Residential (R'7) zoning are more restrictive, as well as the modified setback and buffer requirements outlined in Conditions 2 and 5, development of the property shall conform to the requirements of the Zoning Ordinance for Corporate Office (0'2) Districts in the Enon Core Design District. (P) 2. Recreational Facility Setbacks & Buffer. All playground areas (i.e. area accommodating swings, jungle gyms or similar such facilities) and all outdoor play fields, courts, swimming pools and similar active recreational facilities shall be located a minimum of: a. Thi (35) feet from adjacent properties (owned by others) zoned residential and occupied with residential use. Within the thirty-five (35) foot setback, a buffer consisting of fencing and landscaping shall be provided in accordance with Exhibit A. Nothing herein shall prevent development of indoor facilities within the thirty-five (35) foot setback. b. Fifteen (15) feet from Florence Avenue. Within the fifteen (lG) foot setback, a buffer consisting of fencing and landscaping shall be provided in accordance with Exhibit B. However, any mxinnnning pool shall meet the required nnininnurn setback for these structures located within R Districts. c Ten (10) feet from the future shared property line between the school site and the existing church. Within the ten (10) foot setback a buffer consisting of fencing and landscaping shall be provided in accordance with Exhibit B. (P) 3. Parking Setbacks & Buffer. All parking areas shall be located a minimum of thirty-five (35) feet from adjacent properties (owned by others) zoned for and occupied by residential uses. Within the thirty-five (35) setback, a buffer consisting of fencing and landscaping shall be provided in accordance with Exhibit A. (P) 4. Lighting. Other than security and parking area lighting, there shall be no exterior lighting for any facilities located on the property. (P) �-1��"�r° /� �sm -~ Property Line mm� Greenl1eaf orAmerican 5,-G' High at Planting Fence 10' or 15' Buffer Boundary Minimurnof6'fall 011m Exact location of fence within 1,5:' buff erto be reviewed and approved attime of site plan ...... , Cali, Ir Trees, planted a Im imLim of 10, inimuirn of 10' on 8o VfO 01V .. ... ium . .. 10' or 15' Buffer Boundary STAFFS ANALYSIS AND RECOMMENDATION Board of Supervisors (BOS) Meeting Date: SEPTEMBER 28, 2016 Applicant's Agent: CHRISTOPHER A. SORENSEN (804-748-1729) RYAN RAMSEY (804-768-7592) Magisterial District: BERMUDA 2021 East Hundred Road Request Property Substantial accord determination to permit a public elementary school in a Residential (R-7) A new elementary school is planned. The new school facility would replace the existing Enon Elementary School, located at 2001 East Hundred Road. Additional acreage is being added to the existing school property to accommodate this school replacement, necessitating substantial accord determination. A. THIS CASE IS SCHEDULED FOR A PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC HEARING ON SEPTEMBER 20,2016. B. Conditions may be imposed. C. Conditions and an exhibit are located in Attachments 1 and 2. DETERMINATION PLANNING STAFF WILL ADVISE THE BOARD OF THE COMMISSION'S ACTION COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION RECOMMEND APPROVAL • Satisfies the criteria of location, character and extent as STAFF 0 Complies with Public Facilities Plan, an element of the Comprehensive Plan • Ordinance and conditions minimize the possibility of any adverse impact on area properties Providing a FIRST CHOICE community through excellence in public service () (,", ( ) �1'1?'�� dw �Il�li i c LL hJ Gr ci+ CL Oo C14rf x✓G17� . © ,�� 0 U- .. Elf M r • IL - • • co 0 LLIt .: ,.. P * Y. 1 Y r7 i, 14WNN IIIINYS1��ILWNVY�Mi�YIIQ119NV'IM'�liN�l�l�l'B�INII69'iNIY�fi'�iIN!�VII'I��i"` i n hJ Gr ci+ uz x✓G17� . © ,�� CE Map 2: Comprehensive Plan Classification: NEIGHBORHOOD BUSINESS The designation suggests the property is appropriate for commercial uses that serve neighborhood - wide trade areas. Typical uses could include grocery stones, clothing stones, medical clinics, hardware stones, restaurants or other uses that primarily serve weekly or bi-weekly household needs. 1Subject Property 3500 250 n 500 Mat) 3: Surroundine Land Uses & Develoi3ment 4 17PDO125-2016SEP PROPOSAL A new elementary school, serving as a replacement tothe existing Enon Elementary School, is planned. The existing facility was constructed in 1935, with several additions constructed thereafter. The new facility would be located on approximately 14.2 acres composed of the existing school property and the request property. The facility would include an educational building, parking area, bus loop and outdoor recreational facilities, such as a playground and sports fields. This proposed location is within the existing attendance boundary for Enon Elementary School. Capacity of the elementary school would be for approximately 750 students. PUBLIC FACILITIES PLAN The proposed elementary school satisfies the criteria of location, character and extent as specified in the Code of Virginia. Specifically, the Public Facilities Plan an element of the Comprehensive Plan states that the existing Enon Elementary School should be revitalized or replaced between the years of 2014-2020. Recommended site criteria for new facilities include: • Located on a minimum of twenty (70)acres; • Have direct access toatleast one collector road; • Contain the school's Vvvn athletic fields, practice areas and playgrounds for students as well as for use by the residents in adjoining community (where appropriate); and w Located within residential areas, not along a major arterial road or within e non- residential area. The redeveloped school facility will continue to access Walnut Drive, a local street, within close proximity to East Hundred Road (a major arterial). The school site is located in an existing residential area, on a total of 14.2 acres. Due to area buildout, obtaining additional acreage to achieve a twenty (20) acre site is not possible. The remaining criteria of the Public Facilities Plan would be achieved with the preliminary site design of the school. DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS & SETBACKS Typically nonresidential development would comply with the Enon Core Design District standards within commercial, office or industrial zoning districts. The applicant's request would maintain the site's current residential zoning with substantial accord approval to permit a public school. Therefore, building setbacks would normally comply with residential standards and parking areas setbacks would comply with Enon Core Design District standards. As conditioned, building and parking area improvements on the request property would be regulated by Enon Core Design District standards for the Corporate Office (0-2) District, except where the requirements of the underlying Residential (R-7) zoning are more restrictive or where conditions stipulate a modified setback or buffer requirement (Conditions 2 & 3). To address the potential impact of outdoor recreational facilities near existing dwellings, Condition 2 contains a provision to provide a minimum setback and landscaping treatment (Exhibit A) for outdoor recreational facilities, including playgrounds. A minimum setback and ��r /�� _ _ _,O '^ ~ Stof(Contacv Anthony Batten (804-717-6167) BattenA@chesterfield.gov When the property is developed, the number of hydrants, quantity ofwater needed for fire protection, and access requirements will be evaluated during the plans review process. CONTY DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Staff Contact* Jim Banks (804-748-1037) ban ksj @chesterf ield.gov The Comprehensive Plan, which includes the Thoroughfare Plan, identifies county -wide transportation needs that are expected to mitigate traffic impacts of future growth. The anticipated traffic impact of the proposal has been evaluated and recommendations are detailed inthe chart below: Potential Site Plan Recommendations Right of Way Recordation * 100 feet from centerline along East Hundred Road (Route 10). Vehicular Access Control 0 No direct access to Route 10. Road Improvements • Anadditional eastbound lane along Route lOfor the property frontage. • A separate right turn lane along Route 10 at the Florence Avenue intersection, as required. • Adequate left turn lanes along Route 1Uatthe existing crossovers that serve Florence Avenue and Walnut Drive, asrequired. • Pedestrian accommodations that correspond with the School Transportation Bus Stop /�� VDOT supports the proposed County uses of the subject property for a public elementary school. VDOT acknowledges that the proposed use in this case is strictly a matter for County determination. However, VDOT will review closely the proposed entrance(s) to the site at time of site construction plan development to assure the safe entrance(s) location and vehicular turning movements. No entrances should be allowed on East Hundred Road. Any proposed entrance on Florence Avenue should be located more than 225 feet from the edge of right-of- way on East Hundred Road. 7 17PD0115-2016SEP20-CPC-RPT .? 1 The proposal's impacts on the County's utility system are detailed in the chart below: Water and Wastewater Systems Currently Size of II Existing Line � Connection Required by County Code? Serviced? V, M The proposed use will not impact the public water and wastewater systems. rp� Z 12"WATERLINE, iFa 811 SEWER LINE! Ilk > 447 41 2a2t 7 'At") 40, .7, I- V,11 8 17 P DO 115-2016SE P20 -CPC -RPT DK Chesterfield Cminty Department of Utilities AJG 201 Al SCALE: 1'-2P0 8 17 P DO 115-2016SE P20 -CPC -RPT DK Stormwater Issue Discussion/Conditions • Located within the Johnson Creek Watershed • Approximately two thirds of the site slopes to the northeast to an existing ditch along East Hundred Road and a culvert under Walnut Drive Geography• Remaining one third slopes southeast to an existing culvert under Florence Avenue, which discharges into a natural channel before entering an existing storm sewer system on the Bermuda Hundred United Methodist Church property. The storm sewer system drains to an existing 36 -inch culvert under East Hundred Road, which discharges to a natural channel to Johnson Creek Environmental 0 There are no 100 -year floodplains or Resource Protection Area Features on-site 0 The existing downstream stormwater conveyance channels, systems, and culverts must be evaluated for adequacy per the Virginia Stormwater Management Program (VSMP) Regulations, Drainage and county and VDOT requirements 0 On-site SWM/BMP facilities or downstream drainage improvements may be needed to address water quantity Storm Water 0 The project is subject to the Part 1113 technical criteria of the VMSP Management Regulations for redevelopment for both water quality and water quantity The existing Enon Elementary School site is not currently located within a revitalization area. However, the Plan encourages renovation of existing public facilities in established communities when economically feasible, and when not, rebuilding on or as close as possible to, existing sites. Public facilities such as schools are an integral part of the community fabric and can have a profound impact on the social, economic and physical character of a neighborhood. Public sector investment acts as a catalyst to spur private investment in these areas. The applicant's proposal to replace the existing school facility at and adjacent to its current location would support the Plan's general revitalization goal to encourage public facility parity throughout the County. Design District. Except where the requirements of the underlying Residential zoning are more restrictive, as well as the modified setback and buffer requirements outlined in Conditions 2 and 3, development of the property shall conform to the requirements of the Zoning Ordinance for Corporate Office (0-2) Districts in the Enon Core Design District. (P) 2. Recreational Facility Setbacks & Buffer. All playground areas (i.e. area accommodating swings, jungle gyms or similar such facilities) and all outdoor play fields, courts, swimming pools and similar active recreational facilities shall be located a minimum of thirty-five (35) feet from adjacent properties (owned by others) zoned for residential use or any existing or proposed public road. Nothing herein shall prevent development of indoor facilities within the thirty-five (35) foot setback. Within the thirty-five (35) setback, a buffer consisting of fencing and landscaping shall be provided in accordance with Exhibit A. (P) 3. Parking Setbacks & Buffer. All parking areas shall be located a minimum of thirty-five (35) feet from adjacent properties (owned by others) zoned for and occupied by residential uses. Within the thirty-five (35) setback, a buffer consisting of fencing and landscaping shall be provided in accordance with Exhibit A. (P) 4. Lightin 4 g. Other than security and parking area lighting, there shall be no exterior lightin,,, for any facilities located on the property. (P) 6191�� Spaced approximately S' between raves of treesL, , S 12 17 P D0115-2016SE P20 -CPC- RPT September 28, 2016 Speakers List Afternoon Session 1. Mr. George Beadles 2. Mr. L. J. McCoy 3. Mr. Marcus Squires 9 a L.J. McCoy, Jr President Denisha Potts Vice President Olive Bonaparte Secretary James Clark Treasurer €olArl o 1909 Wednesday, September 28, 2016 To the honorable Chairman of the Board, Vice Chair, board members, and County Administrator Mr. Casey, my name is L. J. McCoy, Jr., president of the Chesterfield NAACP. As you have recognized the disturbance of current events across our country concerning the mistreatment of unarmed African Americans, small matters are often the cause of larger situations. The Tulsa, Oklahoma murder of Mr. Terrence Crutcher who had his hands up, the fatal shooting of Mr. Keith Lamont Scott in Charlotte, North Carolina, and even here in South Boston, Virginia where Mr. Linwood Lambert, Jr. received repeated fatal stun gun hits have all added to the lack of confidence by government officials. We are blessed that those matters have not surfaced into the African American community here in Chesterfield County. Yet, there is an African American community — Carver Heights - that has been making a peaceful plea to say "Hands up, Don't shoot'. This Carver Heights community has recognized, and voiced that it does not welcome additional businesses in their community. With over 100 residents expressing in a signed petition, they strongly believe no other business belongs in their area. Why are you, as county officials, rejecting the voices of your citizens? Their legitimate plea to preserve their neighborhood is being ignored. The community of concerned citizens has spoken. It's now up to the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors to acknowledge their request. Thank you. Resp tfully, L. . Mc Jr. AACP Branch 2 7 Osb r e d. C ester, V 831 804 241-7866 mccovp,itlo@verizon.net 7 /� CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Meeting Date: September 28, 2016 Item Number: 11. Closed Session Closed session pursuant to Section 2.2-3711 (A) (1) , Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended, relating to the performance of a specific county employee. Preparer: Jeffrey L. Mincks Attachments: 11 Yes No Title: County Attorney 0425:95833.1 COUNTYCHESTERFIELD BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Meetin Date: September 28, 2016 Item Number: 15.A. Resolution Recognizing "Christmas Mother Day" in Chesterfield County l County Adrninistratot:-- , Board Action Requested: Adoption of the attached resolution. Dr. Deborah Koller has been elected Christmas Mother for 2016. She will be present at the meeting to accept the resolution. Preparer: Kiva Rogers Attachments: 0 Yes Title: Director, Department of Social Services 11 No "]C ill ii; WHEREAS, most families in Chesterfield County enjoy peace and happiness during the Christmas holidays; and WHEREAS, there are many children and elderly who are less fortunate and do not have the means to enjoy this special time of year; and WHEREAS, the Chesterfield -Colonial Heights Christmas Mother Program has successfully provided food, gifts, books and clothing to many of our citizens in the past; and WHEREAS, Dr. Deborah Koller has been elected Christmas Mother for 2016 and requests the support of all the citizens of Chesterfield County to ensure that those less fortunate may enjoy this special season of the year. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors, this 28th day of September 2016, publicly recognizes October 11, 2016, as "Christmas Mother Day" and urges all residents of Chesterfield County to support this worthy endeavor. AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors publicly commends the Christmas Mother Program for its successful efforts in past years and extends best wishes for a successful 2016 season. AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that a copy of this resolution be presented to Dr. Koller and that this resolution be permanently recorded among the papers of this Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County, Virginia. 1�1' I ') .S i BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 1 of 1 AGENDA Meeting Date: September 28, 2016 Item Number: 15.B. Resolution Recognizing Mr. Attilio Peter Pedroli Upon Attaining the Rank of Eagle Scout County Administrator: Adoption of the attached resolution. Staff has received a request for the Board to adopt a resolution recognizing Mr. Attilio Peter Pedroli, Venture Crew 2831, sponsored by Woodlake United Methodist Church, upon attaining the rank of Eagle Scout. Mr. Pedroli is a resident of the Clover Hill District. He will be present at the meeting, accompanied by members of his family, to accept the resolution. Preparer: Janice Blakley Attachments: 0 Yes No RECOGNIZING MR. ATTILIO PETER PEDROLI UPON ATTAINING THE RANK OF EAGLE SCOUT WHEREAS, the Boy Scouts of America was incorporated by Mr. William D. Boyce on February 8, 1910, and was chartered by Congress in 1916; and WHEREAS, the Boy Scouts of America was founded to build character, provide citizenship training and promote physical fitness; and WHEREAS, after earning at least twenty-one merit badges in a wide variety of skills including leadership, service and outdoor life, serving in a leadership position in a troop, carrying out a service project beneficial to his community, being active in the troop, demonstrating Scout spirit, and living up to the Scout Oath and Law, Mr. Attilio Peter Pedroli, Venture Crew 2831, sponsored by Woodlake United Methodist Church, has accomplished those high standards of commitment and has reached the long -sought goal of Eagle Scout, which is received by only four percent of those individuals entering the Scouting movement; and WHEREAS, growing through his experiences in Scouting, learning the lessons of responsible citizenship, and endeavoring to prepare himself for a role as a leader in society, Attilio has distinguished himself as a member of a new generation of prepared young citizens of whom we can all be very proud. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors, this 28th day of September 2016, publicly recognizes Mr. Attilio Peter Pedroli, extends congratulations on his attainment of Eagle Scout, and acknowledges the good fortune of the county to have such an outstanding young man as its citizen. 17 IM -MEM, Meeting Date: September 28, 2016 Item Number: Resolution Recognizing First Sergeant David Wayne Holland, Virginia State Police, for His Outstanding Service to Chesterfield County County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Mr. Elswick has requested the Board adopt the attached resolution. First Sergeant David Wayne Holland will retire from the Virginia State Police on October 1, 2016, after 48 years of service. Since 1978, First Sergeant Holland has served as the Commander of Area 6, which encompasses the City of Colonial Heights and the Counties of Amelia, Chesterfield, and Powhatan. As Commander of Area 6, he has been extremely supportive of Chesterfield County's public safety divisions. Preparer: Robert L. Eanes — Title: Assistant to the County Administrator Attachments, Yes —1 No # E RECOGNIZING FIRST SERGEANT DAVID WAYNE HOLLAND FOR HIS OUTSTANDING SERVICE TO CHESTERFIELD COUNTY WHEREAS, on April 1, 1968, Mr. David Wayne Holland joined the Virginia State Police as a Probationary Trooper and was assigned to the Richmond Division, Area 4 Office in Mineral, VA; and WHEREAS, prior to joining the Virginia State Police, Mr. Holland proudly served in the United States Army 101st Airborne Division, Fort Campbell, Kentucky; and WHEREAS, on November 10, 1968, Trooper Holland graduated from the Virginia State Police Academy as a member of the 46th Basic Session, was elected President of his Class, and reported for his first patrol assignment to the Chesapeake Division, Area 32 Office in the City of Portsmouth, Virginia; and WHEREAS, from 1968 to 1976, Trooper Holland dutifully patrolled the highways of Portsmouth, Norfolk and Isle of Wight County; and WHEREAS, on July 16, 1976, Trooper Holland was promoted to the rank of Sergeant and transferred to the Culpeper Division, Area 12 Office in the town of Warrenton, Virginia; and WHEREAS, on September 1, 1978, Sergeant Holland accepted a promotion to First Sergeant and transferred to the Richmond Division, Area 6 Office in Powhatan County, Virginia; and WHEREAS, since 1978, First Sergeant Holland has served as the Commander of Area 6, which encompasses the City of Colonial Heights and the Counties of Amelia, Chesterfield, and Powhatan; and WHEREAS, First Sergeant Holland assisted in creation and training of the original Virginia State Police TACT Team; and WHEREAS, First Sergeant Holland graduated from the FBI National Academy in 1985; and WHEREAS, First Sergeant Holland was instrumental in the establishment of the Virginia State Police Funeral Coordinator program in 1993 and the advancement of the program through his exceptional leadership and mentoring; and WHEREAS, in his role as a Virginia State Police Funeral Coordinator, First Sergeant Holland has provided superior service to the department and countless families through his attention to detail, persistence for perfection, and genuine compassion during times of great loss and sorrow; and WHEREAS, First Sergeant Holland and other representatives of Virginia State Police attended the Federal Emergency Management Agency's Emergency Management Institute in 1994, joining more than 80 Chesterfield County public safety personnel in the Community Integrated Emergency Management Course; and WHEREAS, First Sergeant Holland was an original member of the Chesterfield County Emergency Planning Committee; and WHEREAS, First Sergeant Holland has participated in many fraternal organizations in his area of responsibility and has assisted in the planning and carrying out of 12 Virginia gubernatorial inaugurations, reflecting highly on the Virginia Department of State Police; and WHEREAS, as Commander of State Police Area 6, more than 100 troopers were promoted under First Sergeant Holland's leadership; and WHEREAS, First Sergeant Holland has been extremely supportive of the Chesterfield County Fire and EMS Department, the Chesterfield County Police Department, and the Chesterfield County Sheriff's Office; and WHEREAS, First Sergeant Holland has driven Virginia State Police vehicles in all types of conditions for a total of approximately 1.4 million miles over 48 years with no motor vehicle accidents; and WHEREAS, First Sergeant Holland is one of the longest -serving Area Commanders in Virginia State Police history; and WHEREAS, First Sergeant Holland will retire from the Virginia State Police effective October 1, 2016, after faithfully serving the Commonwealth for 48 years; and WHEREAS, First Sergeant Holland is married to Elaine Holland, has two sons, David Holland with the Chesterfield County Fire and EMS Department and Lieutenant Robby Holland with the Virginia State Police, and has four grandchildren, Grace, Leah, Ella, and Jackson. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors, this 28th day of September 2016, publicly recognizes the achievements and cooperative working relationship of First Sergeant David Wayne Holland and expresses appreciation on behalf of all Chesterfield County residents. AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that a copy of this resolution be presented to First Sergeant Holland and that this resolution be permanently recorded among the papers of this Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County, Virginia. Meeting Date: September 28,2016 Item Number: 18.A. Public Hearing for Code Amendment Related to Limited Events on Agricultural (A) Property (17PJ0109) County Administrator: Board Action Reguested4R1 � t Following a public hearing, adopt the attached code amendments. On September 20, 2016, following a public hearing, the Planning Commission on a vote of 5-0 recommended approval of the amendment. (Attachment A) The proposed amendment would allow limited events in an Agricultural District subject to certain restrictions. If the restrictions cannot be met, a Conditional Use may be requested. A limited event is a gathering at which a fee is charged for the purpose of viewing, listening to, or participating in an entertainment or social activity. The proposed amendment would, among other things, allow such uses on a minimum of 50 acres, 4 times in any calendar year. The acreage requirement is intended to minimize the potential impact on adjacent properties and to steer the uses into the more rural part of the county where fewer residential uses that might be impacted exist. The Commission, at their August work session, requested maps showing Agricultural (A) properties of 25 or more and 50 or more acres. (Attachments B and C) Preparer: Kirkland A. Turner Title: Director of Planning Attachments:M Yes IV® CHESTERFIELD COUNTY , T BOARD SUPERVISORS .SOR AGENDA The amendment has been advertised to give the Board flexibility to, among other things, recommend that events be allowed on more or less acreage and establish the circumstances under which the events may occur, such as but not limited to, hours and days of operation, number of participants and improvements permitted to accommodate use. AN ORDINANCE • AMEND THE CODE OF r 1997,AMENDED, AMENDING AND RE-ENACTING SECTIONS 19.1-52,19.1-53 AND 19.1-570 OF VWO'r •, 0XV01011 16y 1r BE I'T ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County: (1) That Sections 19.1.52, 19.1-53 and 19.1-570 of the Code of the County of Chester field, 1997, as amended, are amended and re-enacted to read as follows: •## a. Use is located on a minimum of 50 acres,• b. Use lasts for a single calendar day for a maximum of 18 hours; c. Use occurs a maximum of 4 calendar days per calendar d. Use does not occur on consecutive calendar days. e. Use does not allow overnight stays; f. Permanent facilities, such as, but not limited to, pavilions, stages, auditoriums, bathrooms or booths are not constructed to accommodate the use; g. Temporary improvements to accommodate the use shall be permitted provided they are removed within 48 hours of the event's cessation; and h. If a music or entertainment permit is not required by Article II of Chapter 3 of the county code, a planning permit is obtained from the planning department for the event. Nothing herein shall negate the requirement to obtain a music or entertainment permit if required by the county code. mm ••0 Event, limited: A gathering at which a fee is charged for the purpose of viewing, listening to, or participating in an entertainment or social activity. A limited event shall not include one for which a voluntary donation is accepted in lieu of a fee. (2) That this or&nance shall become effective immediately upon adoption. 1928:96971.1 �, OD 0,2, , , r., CL (D C4 a33 I 4? 0 A�l MR �xCl�monb �zme�-�z�c��ch Advertising Affidavit 300 E. Franklin Street Richmond, Virginia 23219 (804) 649-6208 COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD BOARD OF SUPERVISORS P.O. BOX 40 9901 LORI RD. CHESTERFIELD, VA 23832 Account Number 3005440 Date September 21, 2016 Date Category Description Ad Size Total Cost 09/21/2016 Meetings and Events TAKE NOTICE Take notice that the Board of Supervisors of Ch 2 x 28 L 272.00 Take notice that the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County, Vb- gginia, at an adjoined meeting on Wednesday, September 2& 2016 at 6 30 pm. in the Conrdy Public Meetir� Roam at tf�e Chesterfield Admin- Publisher Of the istration Burdmg, Ibute 10 and Lan Aoad, Chesterfield, Virginia w01 hold a pub4c hearing to uns der AnordinancetoamerdtireCodeoftlueCourdyotChesteriield,1997, Richmond Times -Dispatch I amended by amending and re�nar ting Sea. 19.1.52,19.1.53 and 191.570 rolatim to united events in Agncuhural Districts This ordkiarcewouldallowgatherings,atwiti�afeekcharged,toview, This is to certify that the attached TAKE NOTICE Take notice t was listen or participate m erderWimnerd or social activity under certam circumstances provided itoccurs on50aaaormore After apublic published b the Richmond Times -Dispatch, City hearing, the proposal may be amended to, among aw things, allow p Y patch, Inc. in the Ci of events mMore orless acreage and establish the circumstances Richmond, State underwhichthe events may occir cmon, ae of Virginia, on the following ,suchasbutnotlimitedto,hours g g d ates: and days on which they occur, number of participants and improvements permitted to aceormnodatethe use. A copy of the full text of the ordinance, including the proposed amend- 09/14, 09/21/2016 merit, is on file in the County Administrator's office, Room 504, 9901 Lori Road, Chesterfield County, Virginia and may be examined by all inter- ested Bisons between the tears of 830 Lm and 5:00 p.m, Monday throug ThehW' is The First insertion being given ... 09/14/2016 The hearing s held at a public facility designed to be accessible to per• g sons with disabilities. Any persons with questions on the accessibility of the facility or the need for reasonable accommodations should con- tact Janice Bakley,Clerk to the Board, at 748.12M Persons needingin- terpreter services for the deaf must notify ews the Clerk to the Board no lat• P P er than Friday, September 212016. Sworn to and subscribed before me this �k�,020 ry Public Supervisor KIMBERLY B HARRIS NOTARY PUBLIC State of Virginia Commonwealth of Virginia 356753 City of Richmond My Commission Expires Jan 31, 2017 My Commission expires THIS IS NOT A BILL. PLEASE PAY FROM INVOICE. THANK YOU P�. t7ttCth?;`--' CHESTERFIELD COUNTY tOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Meefing_Date:Septemberi. f` Item t• 18.B. „y Hold a Public Hearing to Consider the FY2018 Transportation Alternatives Project County Administrator: Board Action Requested: 4. The Board is requested to hold a public hearing to consider the FY2018 Transportation Alternatives Project, adopt a resolution of support for the project, upon approval by VDOT, appropriate up to $880,000 in anticipated VDOT reimbursement and transfer $220,000 in county appropriations for local match funds. With the adoption of MAP -21, three programs - Safe Routes to School, Enhancements and Recreational Trails - have been restructured into one program called Transportation Alternatives. Projects eligible for Transportation Alternatives funding include: • On -road and off-road pedestrian and bicycle facilities • Safe routes for non -drivers (children, older adults and individuals with disabilities) to access daily needs • Conversion of abandoned railway corridors to bike and/or pedestrian trails • Construction of turnouts, overlooks and viewing areas • Historic preservation and rehabilitation of historic transportation facilities (Continued on next page) -•. -, Jesse W. Smith Attachments: El M Yes No # ;;Y CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 2 of 3 AGENDA ., 1 Summary of Information: (Continued) • Inventory/control/removal of outdoor advertising • Vegetation management to improve safety, prevent against invasive species and provide erosion control • Archaeological activities relating to impacts from implementation of a transportation project • Environmental mitigation to address stormwater management, water pollution prevention due to road construction or runoff • Wildlife mortality mitigation The deadline for FY2018 Transportation Alternative projects is November 1, 2016. VDOT staff will review project applications for eligibility and the Commonwealth Transportation Board and Transportation Planning Organization will subsequently select projects for funding. Staff recommends continuation of the magisterial district rotation, as utilized previously, for project selection (Dale, Clover Hill, Midlothian, Bermuda, Matoaca). Staff recommends the following project, located in the Dale district, be submitted for consideration: • Stratton Park Pedestrian Improvements - $1,100,000 If selected and approved, this project will require a local match of $220,000; appropriation of $880,000 in anticipated VDOT reimbursements; authorization to proceed with design, right-of-way and construction advertisement. Staff recommends the Board take the following actions for the FY2018 Transportation Alternatives Project, Stratton Park Pedestrian Improvements: 1. Adopt the attached resolution requesting VDOT approval and guaranteeing the local match for Stratton Park Pedestrian Improvement project; 2. If selected and approved, appropriate $880,000 in anticipated VDOT reimbursements; 3. Transfer from the General Road Improvements Account, $220,000 for the local match; 4. Authorize the County Administrator to enter into the customary VDOT/County agreements/ contracts, permits/mitigation agreements, and surety agreements, acceptable to the County Attorney; WHEREAS, it is necessary that the local governing body request, by resolution, approval of a proposed transportation alternatives project. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County requests the Commonwealth Transportation Board provide funding for the Stratton Park Pedestrian Improvements project. AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Board hereby agrees to pay 20 percent of the total estimated cost of $1,100,000 for construction of the Stratton Park Pedestrian Improvements project. bugmOub &MCS -Dispatch Advertising Affidavit 300 E. Franklin Street Richmond, Virginia 23219 (804) 649-6208 COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD BOARD OF SUPERVISORS P.O. BOX 40 9901 LORI RD. CHESTERFIELD, VA 23832 Account Number 3005440 Date September 21, 2016 Date Category Description Ad Size Total Cost 09/27/2016 Meetings and Events CHESTERFIELD COUNTY PROPOSED FY2018 TRANSPOR 2 x 46 L 231.20 CNEMDIEW COJIM PROPOSED FrA18 TRANSPORTATION ALTERNATM PROJECT Take notice that the County Admkuistrator has submitted recommended me Fy2018 TransportationAltarepves Prgect to the Board of Supervi• Publisher of the sons. The Board of Supervises will hdd a public at its regular thehearing ibf �tingen he nsterfIn �IIfGIlS rwj omplez at,0001IronBridge Richmond Times -Dispatch Raa4 Eerf0 Yrrggiia, to considerthe projectThe county mends torfronds al CIObytheCommonwealthTransportation BoardRichmond Area Motropdrlan Flaming Organization for the This is to certify that the attached CHESTERFIELD COUNTY PROPO Projects elible for funding through the Transportation Aftematives was published by the Richmond Times -Dispatch, Inc. in the City of Program include: •On•roadandoff-road pedestrian and bicuclefacilities Richmond, State of Virginia, on the following dates: @Safe routes for norArivers (children, o eradults and individuals with disabilities) to access daily needs • Conversion of abandoned railway corridors to bike and/or 09/21/2016 pedestrian drmouK off overlooks and viewing areas s Historic preservation and rehabilitation 0 historic transportation facilities •Inventory/cordrol/removalof outdoor advertising The First insertion being given ... 09/21/2016 • Vegetation managemerrtto improve salt, invasive species and provide erosion cordrd sArchaeologiciiJactivities relating toimpacts him implementation of an eligible transportation pr Newspaper reference: 0000380220 s Environmental mitigation to address stormwater management, water pollution prevention due to road construction or runoff •NAkB'rfem mitigation Citizens who would ike o comment on the county's proposed Trans. Sworn to and subscribed before me this portati•Dn Alternatives Project are moo to send their comments In wribn8 o the Transportation Department, Chesterfield County, P.D. Boz40,ChesteftVA 23832,AtImiesseSmith. Information regaNing the proposed Tra sportation Aftematives Project is available in the irarspoRation Department, 3rd ADor of the Comma ity Development Building, 9800 Govemnent Center Parkway, Chester• field VA 23832 and may examined by all interested persons between the lours of 8:30 am. and 5:00 p.m, Monday through friday. For further irdomation,please ml (89)74&1037. 6j4N The heartng is held at a public facility designed to be accessible to per. j "Public sons with dis�ilities. Any persons with questions on the attessib lily of the facility or need for reasonable accommodatias should contact Janice Nakley, Clerk to the Board, at (804) 761200. Persons needing y Supervisor interpreterthe rust notify the Clerk o the Board no I Fridayor 23, 2016. KIMBERLY B HARRIS NOTARY PUBLIC State of Virginia Commonwealth of Virginia 356753 City of Richmond My Commission Expires Jan 31, 2017 My Commission expires THIS IS NOT A BILL. PLEASE PAY FROM INVOICE. THANK YOU rA K:.�. AGENDA •`.Septemberis 6 Item ilumber:i. Public Hearing to Consider Amendments to County Code Section 16-2 Regarding Approval of License Agreements by the County Administrator or His Designee County Administrator: W Hoard Action Requested:'. The Board is requested to hold a public hearing to consider amendments to County Code § 16-2 regarding approval of license agreements by the County Administrator or his designee. • Section 16-2 of the County Code requires anyone who does work on County property, including work in a County easement or right-of-way, to receive approval from the Board of Supervisors. Examples of these requests include residents who want permission to construct a fence across a utility easement or a dock in the Swift Creek Reservoir. There is no legal requirement that the Board of Supervisors be the body to grant these approvals. Staff recommends that the Board amend the County Code to authorize the County Administrator or his designee to consider these requests and grant the approvals. Preparer: Jeffrey L. Mincks Title: County Attorney 0623:97293.1(97147.1) Attachments: Yes No •Olivia•• • '.. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County: (1) That Section 16-2 of the Code of the County of Chesterfield, 1997, as amended, is amended and re-enacted to read as follows.- Sec. ollows: Sec. 16-2o Approval required; requirements; inspections® a. No person shall do work of any kind in any street, highway, public right-of-way, easement or other area dedicated to public use within the county, without having first made application, accompanied by a plan or sketch, to the bo-afd—of supr-s county administrator or his designee, and having received from it the county administrator or his designee approval to do the work and use the area. b. All construction or repair work of any nature performed by any person shall be performed according to the approved plans and specifications and the written instructions of the board of sup county administrator or its his designee. The county administrator or his designee, however, is hereby vested with the authority to waive the requirements of formal plans or specifications where the work to be done is of a routine nature and is so limited in scope as not to require detailed plans and specifications for its proper execution. The county administrator or his designee shall be notified immediately upon completion of the work for which the approval was granted in order to enable prompt inspection of the work. (2) That this ordinance shall become effective immediately upon adoption. 0623:97147.1 �Rxcl�monb �zme�-�t��cl� Advertising Affidavit 300 E. Franklin Street Richmond, Virginia 23219 (804) 649-6208 COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD BOARD OF SUPERVISORS P.O. BOX 40 9901 LORI RD. CHESTERFIELD, VA 23832 Account Number 3005440 Date September 21, 2016 Date Category Description Ad Size Total Cost 09/21/2016 Meetings and Events TAKE NOTICE Take notice that the Board of Supervisors of Ch 2 x 20 L 207.20 TAKE NOTICE Take notice that the Boyd of Wrvisors of Chesterfield Coot, Vk• gima, at an adjoumed meeting on Wednesday, September 28, 2016 at 6I pm. inthe County Pubfic Meeting Room aft Chesterfield kdmi . ish tion Budding, Route 10 and Lon Road, Chesterfield, Yrginia, will hold a pubic hearing to consider. An ordinance to amend the Code oftheCountyofChesterfield, 1997, as amended, by amending and re ting Sec 10 relating to approval of license agreements. A icopyof the full tW of the ordinance, including the proposed amend: merit, is on file in the Cut AdminisMhator's office, Room 504, 9901 Lori Road Chesterfied County, YiNinia and may be aninedd by all inter• ested between the hours of 830 am. and iW pan, Monday thr Friday. The hearil is held at a pubic facility designed to be accessible to per• sores with disabilities Any persons with questions on the accessibility of the Wity or the need for reasonable accommodations should con. tact Janice Blaldey, CIdto the Board, at7612K Persons needing 6 terpreter services for the deaf most notify the Clerk tothe Board no lot• ei than Friday, September 4 2016. Publisher of the Richmond Times -Dispatch This is to certify that the attached TAKE NOTICE Take notice t was published by the Richmond Times -Dispatch, Inc. in the City of Richmond, State of Virginia, on the following dates: Uk7i n irrl :7f��i �F�zrS r8 The First insertion being given ... 09/14/2016 Newspaper reference: 0000380205 Sworn to and subscribed before me this No PublicSupervisor KIMBERLY B HARRIS NO TARV PUBLIC Commonwaslth of Virginia State of Virginia 356753 City of Richmond My Commission Expires Jan 31, 2017 My Commission expires THIS IS NOT A BILL. PLEASE PAY FROM INVOICE. THANK YOU acCHESTERFIELD BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 1 of 1 AGENDA Meebing Date: September 28, 2016 Itern-flumber: 18.D. PUBLIC HEARING: Consider the Exercise of Eminent Domain for the Acquisition of a Permanent Drainage Easement for the Old Bermuda Hundred Road at Old Stage Road Improvements Project County Administrator. Board Action Requested: �� g Authorize the County Attorney to proceed with eminent domain for the acquisition of a 10, permanent drainage easement for the Old Bermuda Hundred Road at Old Stage Road Improvements Project and authorization to enter and take such easement prior to eminent domain proceedings. A drainage easement for the Old Bermuda Hundred Road at Old Stage Road Improvements Project is needed across the property of the Heirs of Thomas Howlett and any other unknown owners. County staff was not able, after diligent effort, to identify or locate the heirs or any other owners. The value of the easement is $22.00. The contract for the construction of the Old Bermuda Hundred Road at Old Stage Road Improvements Project has already been awarded. If the county proceeds with eminent domain, a certificate of deposit will be filed with the court, which will allow the county to immediately enter and use the easement so the project can proceed without delay. Sufficient funds are available in the budget to pay the anticipated condemnation costs. Approval is recommended. District: Bermuda Attachments: Yes ❑ No # VICINITY SKETCH PUBLIC HEARING: Consider the Exercise of Eminent Domain for the Acquisition of a Permanent Drainage Easement for the Old Bermuda Hundred Road at Old Stage Road Improvements Project N —Chastofield Courty DePSAM'Ert cf Ufliftes U') 0U-1 o pn CS 0 �., lni Q> Q3 c , lz Srt r,672 �,- 70v35 R, goo F7- Lw to /000 0 �., lni goo F7- Lw to /000 0 �., lni m Advertising Affidavit 300 E. Franklin Street Richmond, Virginia 23219 (804)649-6208 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY RIGHT OF WAY OFFICE 9840 GOVERNMENT CENTER PKWY. P.O. BOX 608 CHESTERFIELD, VA 23832 Account Number 6025752 Date—� September 21, 2016 Date Category Description Ad Size Total Cost 09/2712016 Meetings and Events TAKE NOTICE That on September 28. 2016, at 6:30 p.m. or as 2 x 19 L 105.50 TAIL Nt1nCE he 4='d of pS lip�wrlsof NlsM6d atibre* Wo n It Ike* Roan d1 d Wa ' vi. *W1 tord* N exbasedf enilleatdomain Vtkacqusihm d i drainage easarerlt to the Cid Bemtlda Hurd RW MIX Stage Road Wmft Ned across i parcel of lad Aacerd to Bermu• da pace Sub*w haloq% to the Hen of Thoma$ Hottlett and any otlle<uakl nWK �mlatim regardigtheeasementatlp�itim am fle inthe ' of WeN Way Otfioe in �ester6eld CouAy, Yrgrda ald may � e»nely �I pa9abel1leenthehoursof 6.30 aA and APA,fty dry kiday. The aid atapldktfadl to De aMessbk toper somWhM furry pelsoraNllhquestiora on the aaesslbs'ty d th W orfWfor 1Madnodatimss1ou4coWlal• is t , M %the Boal at 7#121 krm W4 ift• mW snices is kdeaf muse notify the Clakk tots Boal nolater *Septaaber21201Q Publisher of the Richmond Times -Dispatch This is to certify that the attached TAKE NOTICE That on Septe was published by the Richmond Times -Dispatch, Inc. in the City of Richmond, State of Virginia, on the following dates: 09121/2016 The First insertion being given ... 09/21/2016 Newspaper reference: 0000395300 Sworn to and subscribed before me this No Public Supervisor i KIMBERLY 8 HARRIS 1 NOTARY PUBLIC State of Virginia Commonwealth of Virginia 358753 �., City Of Richmond My Commission Expires Jan 31, 2017 My Commission expires THIS IS NOT A BILL. PLEASE PAY FROM INVOICE. THANK YOU BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page I of 1 AGENDA Meeting Date: September 28, 2016 Item Number: 21. Adjournment and Notice of Next Supervisors Scheduled Meeting of the Board of Summary of Information: Motion of adjournment and notice of the Board of Supervisors meeting to be held on October 12, 2016, at 3:00 p.m. in the Public Meeting Room. Preparer: Janice Blakley Attachments: ❑ Yes Wm�fflmlz WITA F770