2016-10-26 Minutes14
r'
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
MINUTES
OCTOBER 26, 2016
Supervisors in Attendance:
Mr. Stephen A. Elswick, Chairman
Ms. Dorothy A. Jaeckle, Vice Chrm.
Mr. Christopher M. Winslow
Mr. James M. Holland
Ms. Leslie A. T. Haley
Dr. Joseph P. Casey
County Administrator
School Board Members in
Attendance:
Ms. Dianne H. Smith, Chairman
Ms. Carrie E. Coyner, Vice Chrm
Mr. John M. Erbach
Mr. Javaid E. Siddiqi
Mr. Robert W. Thompson
Dr. James Lane
School Superintendent
Legislators in Attendance:
Senator Amanda Chase
Delegate Lashrecse Aird
Delegate Betsy Carr
Delegate M. Kirkland Cox
Delegate Roslyn R. Dance
Delegate Riley Ingram
Delegate Roxann Robinson
Delegate R. Lee Ware, Jr.
16-568
Staff in Attendance:
Mr. Mike Bacile, Dir.,
Purchasing
Ms. Janice Blakley,
Clerk to the Board
Mr. Clay Bowles, Dir.,
General Services
Ms. Patsy Brown, Dir.,
Accounting
Mr. Kevin Bruny, Chief
Learning Officer
Ms. Debbie Burcham,
Exec. Dir., Community
Services Board
Mr. Allan Carmody,
Finance Dir.
Mr. Barry Condrey,
Chief Information Officer
IST
Ms. Mary Ann Curtin, Dir.,
Intergovtl. Relations
Mr. Jonathan Davis, Real
Estate Assessor
Mr. William Dupler, Dep.
County Administrator
Colonel Thierry Dupuis,
Police Department
Mr. Robert Eanes, Asst. to
the County Administrator
Mr. Lawrence C. Haake, III,
Registrar
Mr. John W. Harmon,
Real Property Manager
Mr. Matt Harris,
Budget Director
Mr. Garrett Hart, Dir.,
Economic Development
Mr. George Hayes, Dir.,
Utilities
Mr. Joseph A. Horbal,
Commissioner of the Revenue
Mr. Louis Lassiter, Dep.
County Administrator
Ms. Mary Martin Selby,
Dir., Human Resources
Mr. Jeffrey L. Mincks,
County Attorney
Ms. Susan Pollard, Dir.,
Public Affairs
Ms. Kiva Rogers, Dir.,
Social Services
Chief Edward Loy Senter,
Fire and EMS
Mr. Scott Smedley, Dir.,
Environmental Engineering
Ms. Cindy Smith, Risk
Manager
Mr. Jesse Smith, Dir.,
Transportation
10/26/16
Ms. Sarah Snead, Dep.
County Administrator
Mr. Richard Troshak, Dir.,
Emergency Communications
Mr. Kirk Turner, Dir.,
Planning
Mr. Rick Witt,
Building Official,
Building Inspection
Dr. James Worsley, Dir.,
Parks and Recreation
Mr. Scott Zaremba, Dep.
County Administrator
Mr. Elswick called the regularly scheduled meeting to order
at 3:00 p.m.
1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES FOR OCTOBER 12, 2016
On motion of Mr. Winslow, seconded by Mr. Holland the Board
approved the minutes of October 12, 2016 as submitted.
Ayes: Elswick, Jaeckle, Winslow, Holland and Haley.
Nays: None.
2. COUNTY ADMINISTRATION UPDATE
2.A. EVERY DAY EXCELLENCE
2.A.1. UTILITIES CUSTOMER SERVICE
• Dr. Casey recognized Ms. Delores Glascoe, customer
service representative in the Utilities Department, for
outstanding customer service to a new resident. Ms.
Helene Miroy, a new resident of the county, complimented
Ms. Glascoe on her outstanding customer service.
2.A.2. RECOGNITION OF ROBERT EANES' SERVICE TO CHESTERFIELD
COUNTY
• Mr. Dupler recognized Mr. Robert Eanes for 50 years of
Service to Chesterfield County.
• Mr. Eanes expressed appreciation for the recognition and
also to the previous and current Boards for their
support during his 50 years of service.
2.B. MODEL COUNTY GOVERNMENT
• Students who participated in Model County Government
attended the meeting and were introduced to the Board of
Supervisors.
2.C. ELECTION PREPAREDNESS
Mr. Larry Haake, Registrar, updated the Board on preparations
for the 2016 Presidential election. He noted the Registrar
has processed nearly 10,000 new voters on the rolls in
Chesterfield during August, September and October. He further
noted 7,700 addresses have been updated, 7,300 re -
registrations have been processed, 12,500 absentee ballots
have been sent out, and 3,576 absentee voters have voted in
person as of 1 p.m. today. He stated absentee voting is 13
16-569
10/26/16
lk
P]
A
percent below 2012; however, statewide absentee voting is 50
percent above 2012 numbers. He further stated absentee voting
will continue through November 5, 2016. He stated the county
has two new precincts this year, Dale District, precinct 215
North Bird, and Matoaca District, precinct 318 West Beach. He
stated precincts with more than 4,000 voters will require two
vote counters, and 19 precincts in the county meet this
requirement. He further stated ballots will contain two
amendments to the Virginia Constitution which is likely to
cause delays at polling places. He noted the Registrar's
Office is conducting outreach regarding the amendments in
order to educate voters prior to arriving at the polling
place in an attempt to limit wait times. He further noted
voters should expect large turnout due to Presidential
election. He dispelled various myths related to the voting
process.
In response to Mr. Holland's concerns, Mr. Haake stated most
polling places are at schools; therefore, there will be ample
parking and accessibility for voters. He further stated
deputy sheriffs will be available for traffic and parking
control at polling places. He noted the county will have
sufficient ballots available.
In response to Mr. Elswick's concerns, Mr. Haake stated
traffic control will be at Phillips Fire Station 13 all day
on Election Day. He further stated he will discuss with VDOT
providing traffic signs to slow the flow of traffic on River
Road on Election Day.
Discussion ensued relative to traffic control at the various
precincts.
2.D. OTHER COUNTY ADMINISTRATION UPDATES
• Dr. Casey reported that the county recently received V3
re -certification through the Virginia Values Veterans
Certification Program.
• Dr. Casey introduced Mr. Clay Bowles, who was recently
appointed Director of General Services after serving as
assistant director for the past two years.
Dr. James Worsley, Director of Parks and Recreation,
announced the county's intention to purchase the River City
Sportsplex. He further stated the county will hold an open
house on November 2, from 3-7 p.m. at Clover Hill High School
to discuss the proposed purchase.
3. BOARD MEMBER REPORTS
Ms. Jaeckle stated a Bermuda District community meeting will
be held at Thomas Dale High School on November 7 at 7 p.m. to
discuss school start times.
Ms. Haley thanked everyone who participated in the Midlothian
Village Day event on October 15. She encouraged citizens to
get involved in the Midlothian Village Plan discussions.
On behalf of Ms. Haley, Ms. Gurpeet Sandhu, James River
High School student, announced the Midlothian District will
hold a community meeting on December 14 at 6 p.m. at
16-570
10/26/16
Midlothian Middle School to discuss the final design and
schematic design for the new Midlothian Elementary School.
(It is noted this meeting was later rescheduled to January
17, 2017.)
On behalf of Mr. Holland, Mr. Colin Profitta, L.C. Bird High
School student, announced the Dale District will hold a
community meeting on November 10 at 7:00 p.m. at Bird High
School to discuss school start times.
Mr. Holland announced the Chesterfield Workforce Center
located at 304 Turner Road in the Cloverleaf Office Park is
now open. He stated the new location provides greater access
for persons seeking employment. He further stated the center
has held one hiring event which was attended by 90 job
seekers.
Mr. Winslow announced the Clover Hill District held a
community meeting on Monday, October 24 to discuss school
start times.
At the request of Mr. Winslow, Ms. Madeline Koski, Monacan
High School Student, offered her opinion on proposed school
start time changes. She stated Option 3 would be the best
option to give elementary students opportunity to expend
their energy learning, while offering high schoolers the
opportunity to hold after-school employment or participate in
extracurricular activities.
On behalf of Mr. Elswick, Mr. Max Kruetzer, Cosby High School
student, announced the Matoaca District will hold two
community meetings in the coming months. He stated the first
meeting will be held at Matoaca High School on November 1 at
7:00 p.m. to discuss school start times. He further stated
the Matoaca District will hold a community meeting at Matoaca
Elementary School on December 15 at 7 p.m. to discuss the
final design and schematic design for the new elementary
school.
4. REQUESTS TO POSTPONE AGENDA ITEMS AND ADDITIONS,DELETIONS
OR CHANGES IN THE ORDER OF PRESENTATION
On motion of Ms. Jaeckle, seconded by Mr. Winslow, the Board
added Item 8.B.1., Appointment to the Youth Services Citizen
Board, and adopted the agenda as amended.
Ayes: Elswick, Jaeckle, Winslow, Holland and Haley.
Nays: None.
5. RESOLUTIONS
There were no resolutions at this time.
6. WORK SESSIONS
6.A. PROCESS FOR RESUBMITTAL OF EXISTING ZONING CASES WITH
CASH PROFFERS
Mr. Turner presented a cash proffer rezoning cases overview.
He stated staff added 60 days to the processing time of cash
16-571
10/26/16
F
F
A
proffer cases based upon modifications enacted by the General
Assembly to maintain compliance with the legislation. He
further stated cash proffer rezoning would involve: 1) re-
alignment of Planning Commission zoning case processing
schedules; 2) Planning Commission future agendas; 3)
reformatting rezoning applications to include service level
and facility capacity impacts of nearby public facilities; 4)
Director of Transportation to conduct review of
Transportation Cash Proffer Methodology; 5) working with the
Planning Commission to develop and refine residential quality
concepts; and 6) reviewing by staff, Planning Commission and
Board of Supervisors. He further stated developers are
showing a great deal of interest in reopening past cases.
Mr. Jesse Smith updated the Board on the current status of
meetings with developers regarding the perspective cases and
implications of the new policy. He stated the cash proffer
policy adopted by the Board on September 28 established
$9,400 as the maximum per dwelling unit road cash proffer,
anticipates that the unique circumstances of developments in
revitalization or preservation areas may justify approval
without a proffer in those areas ($0), continues to allow
developers to choose to construct in-kind improvements to
address the development's impacts in lieu of all or a portion
of the road cash proffer ($0 - $9,400), and the county will
consider circumstances that mitigate the proposal's impact,
based on information provided by the applicant's engineer
(<$9,400).
In response to Ms. Jaeckle's concern, Mr. Smith stated the
Board established a maximum and if the impact is more than
the maximum staff would review the case.
In response to Ms. Jaeckle's concern, Mr. Mincks stated it
would always be within the province of the Board to review
safety and welfare concerns and determine if those concerns
were adequately addressed.
Mr. Turner stated the Homebuilders will be providing input
regarding quality concepts or elements that should be
considered. He further stated staff will continue to review
the projects, review and improve the format of reporting, and
continue to work with the development community and the
Planning Commission to clearly identify and express
expectations with regard to quality. He noted staff will
continue to provide the Board with sufficient information to
make informed decisions. He further noted community meetings
will be held for citizen input and the Planning Commission
will thoroughly vet the cases before coming to the Board. He
stated the Board has 12 months to take action on the proffer
cases.
In response to Mr. Holland's inquiry, Mr. Mincks stated the
12 months begins running from the date the request comes
before the Board for the first time.
In response to Mr. Elswick's concerns, Mr. Turner explained
the ability of an applicant to defer the case by their own
choice. He further stated the Planning Commission has up to
100 days to defer a case, or it can be deferred longer with
the applicant's consent. He noted cases should be approved
120 days after filing.
16-572
10/26/16
In response to Ms. Jaeckle's concerns, Mr. Turner stressed
the importance of cash proffers in revitalization areas to
ensure that the county has the type of investment that will
be vital in the future, not only for the short term.
7. DEFERRED ITEMS
There were no deferred items at this time.
8. NEW BUSINESS
8.A. CONSENT ITEMS
8.A.1. ADOPTION OF RESOLUTIONS
8.A.l.a. RECOGNIZING MR. DALE CANNADY FOR HIS SERVICE TO THE
RICHMOND METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY
Mr. Holland commended Mr. Cannady for his outstanding service
to the Richmond Metropolitan Transportation Authority since
2008.
On motion of Mr. Holland, second by Ms. Jaeckle, the Board
adopted the following resolution:
WHEREAS, the Richmond Metropolitan Authority (RMA) was
created by an act of the Virginia General Assembly in 1966,
and was originally tasked with building and maintaining a
toll expressway system for the Richmond area; and
WHEREAS, the role of the RMA expanded, to owning and
operating other facilities, including parking decks and The
Diamond, current home of the Richmond Flying Squirrels; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Dale Cannady was appointed in 2008 to the
Richmond Metropolitan Authority as one of two Chesterfield
County representatives; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Cannady was reappointed by Chesterfield in
2014 when the General Assembly passed legislation to equalize
the Board and change the name to Richmond Metropolitan
Transportation Authority (RMTA); and
WHEREAS, during his tenure on the RMA/RMTA Board, Mr.
Cannady served on the following committees: Finance,
Personnel/Compensation and Benefits, Nominations and
Governance, Regional Projects and Outreach, and Local
Finance; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Cannady was a dedicated board member and
served as the chair for Nominations and Governance, Regional
Projects and Outreach, as well as Local Finance, and he also
served as a facilitator for the 2014 board retreat; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Cannady's community service includes Chair
of the 2001 Richmond area United Way Campaign, Chair of
Hospital Hospitality House, Chair of Prevent Blindness Mid -
Atlantic, and as Interim President of Leadership Metro
Richmond for one year.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chesterfield
16-573
10/26/16
9
Ic
PC
A
County Board of Supervisors recognizes Mr. Dale Cannady and
expresses appreciation for his dedicated and outstanding
service to the Richmond Metropolitan Transportation Authority
on behalf of the citizens of Chesterfield County.
Ayes: Elswick, Jaeckle, Winslow, Holland and Haley.
Nays: None.
8.A.1.b.
RECOGNIZING COUNTY EMPLOYEES UPON THEIR RETIREMENT
8.A.1.b.1. BATTALION CHIEF CORIS D. THROCKMORTON, JR., FIRE
AND EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT
On motion of Mr. Holland, second by Ms. Jaeckle, the Board
adopted the following resolution:
WHEREAS, Battalion Chief Coris D. Throckmorton, Jr.
retired from the Chesterfield Fire and Emergency Medical
Services Department, Chesterfield County, on October 1, 2016;
and
WHEREAS, Chief Throckmorton attended Recruit School #24
in 1993, and has faithfully served the county and its
residents for 23 years in various assignments, from
firefighter to battalion chief; and
WHEREAS, Chief Throckmorton served as a firefighter at
the Wagstaff, Dale and Airport Fire and EMS Stations and in
the Fire and Life Safety Division; and
WHEREAS, Chief Throckmorton was promoted to lieutenant
in 2002 and served in the Fire and Life Safety Division; and
WHEREAS, Chief Throckmorton was promoted to captain in
2004 and served at the Airport Fire and EMS Station; and
WHEREAS, Chief Throckmorton was promoted to battalion
chief in 2006 and served in the Emergency Operations Division
as a battalion chief on "B" shift in the southern, northern
and western battalions; and
WHEREAS, Chief Throckmorton served as a National
Registry Paramedic, Rapid Sequence Intubation Paramedic and
as an Advanced Life Support Field Training Officer; and
WHEREAS, Chief Throckmorton was a Hazardous Materials
Specialist and served on the Hazardous Incident Team for 20
years; and
WHEREAS, Chief Throckmorton served on the Honor Guard
Committee and assisted in the creation of the department's
Honor Guard; and
WHEREAS, Chief Throckmorton served as the team leader
for the Fire Marshal's Law Enforcement Powers Process Action
Team.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chesterfield
County Board of Supervisors recognizes the contributions of
Battalion Chief Coris D. Throckmorton, Jr., expresses the
appreciation of all residents for his service to the county
16-574
10/26/16
and extends appreciation for his dedicated service and
congratulations upon his retirement.
Ayes: Elswick, Jaeckle, Winslow, Holland and Haley.
Nays: None.
8.A.1.b.2. MR. HARRY P. "SKIP" STANLEY, DEPARTMENT OF MENTAL
HEALTH SUPPORT SERVICES
On motion of Mr. Holland, second by Ms. Jaeckle, the Board
adopted the following resolution:
WHEREAS, Mr. Harry P. "Skip" Stanley was hired by
Chesterfield Mental Health Support Services on June 24, 1988,
and will retire November 1, 2016, after providing outstanding
service to the residents of Chesterfield County; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Stanley served in many capacities including
Residential Services Supervisor, ID Service Coordination Day
Program Manager, Interim Chester House Program Manager and
Residential Services Program Manager; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Stanley worked tirelessly with Chesterfield
Alternatives Incorporated (CAI) to develop plans for over 25
homes in the Community Homes Program, secured seven HUD 811
Grants to expand permanent housing opportunities to
individuals with serious mental illness and intellectual
disabilities as well as winning the annual "Bright Idea"
award from the Harvard School of Business for the "Build -A -
House" Program; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Stanley was instrumental in the planning
and development with CAI of four Build -A -House projects;
Church Road, Cogbill, Woodpecker and Pine Forest, in
collaboration with the Chesterfield Community Services Board,
county schools leadership, and County Administration; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Stanley was instrumental in the planning
and development of Pampas House and Galloway Place with both
being certified as ICF -IID facilities in 2011 and 2015,
respectively; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Stanley worked to combat homelessness by
serving on the Board of Homeward, serving as Chairman on the
region's Continuum of Care Process obtaining federal funding
to address homelessness and serving as the county's
representative on the Regional Task Force to End
Homelessness; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Stanley represented the Virginia
Association of Community Services Boards (VACSB)on the State
Housing Disability Commission and served as the county's
representative for 12 years on the Area Emergency Food and
Shelter Program Board helping fund agencies providing
shelter, food and rent to citizens in crisis; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Stanley dedicated his time and knowledge in
the pursuit of better residential services resulting in
numerous NACo and VACo awards for innovations in community
housing including the Build -a -House project; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Stanley consistently demonstrated
16-575
10/26/16
9
P]
CEJ
compassion, empathy and good humor and will be greatly missed
by individuals, families, colleagues and co-workers.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chesterfield
County Board of Supervisors recognizes the outstanding
contributions of Mr. Harry P. "Skip" Stanley and extends
appreciation, on behalf of its members and the citizens of
Chesterfield County, for more than 28 years of dedicated
service to the county, congratulations upon his retirement,
and best wishes for a long, happy and healthy retirement.
Ayes: Elswick, Jaeckle, Winslow, Holland and Haley.
Nays: None.
8.A.2. ACCEPTANCE OF STATE ROADS
On motion of Mr. Holland, second by Ms. Jaeckle, the Board
adopted the following resolution:
WHEREAS, the streets described below are shown on a plat
recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of
Chesterfield County; and
WHEREAS, the Resident Engineer for the Virginia
Department of Transportation has advised this Board the
streets meet the requirements established by the Subdivision
Street Requirements of the Virginia Department of
Transportation.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that this Board requests
the Virginia Department of Transportation to add the streets
described below to the secondary system of state highways,
pursuant to Section 33.2-705, Code of Virginia, and the
Department's Subdivision Street Requirements.
AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that this Board guarantees
a clear and unrestricted right-of-way, as described, and any
necessary easements for cuts, fills and drainage.
AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that a certified copy of
this resolution be forwarded to the Resident Engineer for the
Virginia Department of Transportation.
Project/Subdivision: Collington Section 14
Type Change to the Secondary System miles of State Highways:
Addition
Reason for Change: New subdivision street
Pursuant to Code of Virginia Statute: §33.2-705
Street Name and/or Route Number
• Longtown Drive, State Route Number 7678
From: 0.23 miles West of Ascot Drive, (Route 7677)
To: Avening Road, a distance of: 0.08 miles.
Recordation Reference: Plat Book 244, Page 33
Right of Way width (feet) = 44
• Avening Court, State Route Number 7900
From: Avening Road, (Route 7588)
To: The cul-de-sac, a distance of: 0.03 miles.
Recordation Reference: Plat Book 224, Page 33
Right of Way width (feet) = 40
16-576
10/26/16
• Avening Road, State Route Number 7588
From: Longtown Drive, (Route 7678)
To: Avening Place, (Route 7899), a distance of: 0.04 miles.
Recordation Reference: Plat Book 224, Page 33
Right of Way width (feet) = 40
• Avening Road, State Route Number 7588
From: Longtown Drive, (Route 7678)
To: Avening Court, (Route 7900), a distance of: 0.05 miles
Recordation Reference: Plat Book 224, Page 33
Right of Way width (feet) = 40
• Avening Place, State Route Number 7899
From: Avening Road, (Route 7588)
To: The cul-de-sac, a distance of: 0.03 miles.
Recordation Reference: Plat Book 224, Page 33
Right of Way width (feet) = 40
• Avening Road, State Route Number 7588
From: Avening Court, (Route 7900)
To: Existing Avening Road, (Route 7588), a distance of:
0.03 miles.
Recordation Reference: Plat Book 224, Page 33
Right of Way width (feet) = 40
• Avening Road, State Route Number 7588
From: Avening Place, (Route 7899)
To: End of Maintenance, a distance of: 0.03 miles.
Recordation Reference: Plat Book 224, Page 33
Right of Way width (feet) = 40
Ayes: Elswick, Jaeckle, Winslow, Holland and Haley.
Nays: None.
8.A.3. ADOPTION OF THE 2017 LEGISLATIVE PROGRAM
On motion of Mr.. Holland, second by Ms. Jaeckle, the Board
adopted the 2017 Legislative Program. (It is noted a copy of
the Legislative Program is filed with the papers of this
Board.)
Ayes: Elswick, Jaeckle, Winslow, Holland and Haley.
Nays: None.
8.A.4. ACCEPTANCE OF A PARCEL OF LAND ALONG AWESOME DRIVE
r*xvM bdol WOOLRIDGE ROAD-MOSELEY, LP
On motion of Mr. Holland, second by Ms. Jaeckle, the Board
accepted the conveyance of a parcel of land containing 0.001
acres along Awesome Drive from 6801 Woolridge Road -Moseley,
LP and authorized the County Administrator to execute the
deed.
Ayes: Elswick, Jaeckle, Winslow, Holland and Haley.
Nays: None.
16-577
10/26/16
P]
8.A.5. REQUEST TO VACATE AND REDEDICATE A TWENTY -FOOT WATER
EASEMENT ACROSS THE PROPERTY OF HAMPTON PARK
COMMERCIAL II, LLC
Authorize the Chairman of the Board and County Administrator
to execute an agreement to vacate and rededicate a 20 -foot
water easement across the property of Hampton Park Commercial
II, LLC.
Ayes: Elswick, Jaeckle, Winslow, Holland and Haley.
Nays: None.
8.A.6. SET DATE FOR PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER VARIOUS
CHANGES TO THE COUNTY CHARTER
On motion of Mr. Holland, seconded by Ms. Jaeckle, the Board
set a public hearing for November 16, 2016 to consider
various changes to the County Charter.
Ayes: Elswick, Jaeckle, Winslow, Holland and Haley.
Nays: None.
8.A.7. TRANSFER OF DISTRICT IMPROVEMENT FUNDS FROM THE
BERMUDA DISTRICT IMPROVEMENT FUND TO THE PARKS AND
RECREATION DEPARTMENT FOR RENTALS AND LABOR ASSOCIATED
WITH THE ANNUAL VETERANS DAY CEREMONY AT BENSLEY PARK
On motion of Mr. Holland, seconded by Ms. Jaeckle, the Board
transferred $680 in Bermuda District Improvement Funds to the
Parks and Recreation Department to pay the cost for renting a
tent and chairs and providing labor for staffing and cleaning
the Community Building as part of the annual Veteran's Day
Ceremony at Bensley Park.
Ayes: Elswick, Jaeckle, Winslow, Holland and Haley.
Nays: None.
8.A.8. AUTHORIZE THE COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR TO EXECUTE A LEASE
FOR THE CHESTERFIELD COUNTY CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER AND
APPROPRIATE AND TRANSFER EXISTING FUNDS TO YOUTH
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT
On motion of Mr. Holland, seconded by Ms. Jaeckle, the Board
authorized the County Administrator to execute a lease for
the Chesterfield County Child Advocacy Center and
appropriated and transferred existing funds, up to $150,000,
to Youth Planning and Development.
Ayes: Elswick, Jaeckle, Winslow, Holland and Haley.
Nays: None.
8.B. APPOINTMENTS
On motion of Ms. Jaeckle, seconded by Ms. Haley, the Board
suspended its rules to allow for simultaneous nomination/
appointment to the Youth Services Citizen Board.
Ayes: Elswick, Jaeckle, Winslow, Holland and Haley.
Nays: None.
16-578
10/26/16
8.B.1. YOUTH SERVICES CITIZEN BOARD
On motion of Ms. Jaeckle, seconded by Ms. Haley, the Board
simultaneously nominated/ appointed Ms. Ronique Day, an adult
representing the Bermuda District, to serve on the Youth
Services Citizen Board for a term effective immediately and
expiring June 30, 2019.
Ayes: Elswick, Jaeckle, Winslow, Holland and Haley.
Nays: None.
9. REPORTS
9.A. REPORT OF PLANNING COMMISSION SUBSTANTIAL ACCORD
DETERMINATION FOR CHESTERFIELD COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS
(CASE 17PD0105) TO PERMIT A PUBLIC ELEMENTARY SCHOOL IN
AN AGRICULTURAL (A) DISTRICT
In response to Ms. Jaeckle's concern, Mr. Turner stated in
the Roseland zoning case the applicant could pay cash
proffers or address the impact through the dedication of a
school site. He further stated the school division has
identified the elementary school site. He noted this does not
rule out the potential for future need. He further noted as
the Roseland case moves forward, the need for a school site
will be addressed at that time.
Ms. Haley stated the Roseland project is currently stalled
and there is an immediate need for a school due to
overcrowding at Watkins Elementary.
Mr. Holland expressed concerns regarding capacity at schools
and the need for trailers at the new schools. He stated
future capacity issues should be taken into account when
building new facilities.
Ms. Haley expressed the need to continue to address
teacher/pupil ratio in schools. She commended the school
division for being forward -thinking in the proposed
referendum projects to maximize the use of new schools.
Ms. Jaeckle stated new school designs need to be of adequate
size to accommodate students and special needs.
In response to Ms. Jaeckle's concerns, Mr. Chris Sorenson
stated the budget allows room for expansion and reduction in
teacher/pupil ratio to allow for smaller classrooms.
Discussion ensued regarding classroom size, pupil/teacher
ratio, and factors that are considered in the design plan.
Mr. Sorenson stated the school division is planning for
additional classrooms by elongating the wings of the
buildings.
Mr. Elswick requested that Dr. Casey work with county staff
to provide sewer to the school site efficiently, and cost
effectively.
16-579
10/26/16
P]
It
F
A
A
A
In response to Mr. Elswick's concern, Mr. Sorensen stated
staff has considered the most effective use of the current
sewer line.
On motion of Mr. Jaeckle, seconded by Mr. Winslow, the Board
accepted the report of the Planning Commission Substantial
Accord determination for Chesterfield County Public Schools
(Case 17PD0105) to permit a public elementary school in an
Agricultural (A) District.
Ayes: Elswick, Jaeckle, Winslow, Holland and Haley.
Nays: None.
10. FIFTEEN -MINUTE CITIZEN COMMENT PERIOD ON UNSCHEDULED
MATTERS
There were no requests to address the Board at this time.
11. DINNER
On motion of Ms. Jaeckle, seconded by Ms. Haley, the Board
recessed to the Eanes-Pittman Public Safety Training Center
for a dinner meeting with members of the county's Legislative
Delegation and School Board.
Ayes: Elswick, Jaeckle, Winslow, Holland and Haley.
Nays: None.
Reconvening:
Mr. Elswick thanked members of the Legislative Delegation and
the School Board members for meeting with the Board of
Supervisors.
Ms. Smith called the School Board meeting to order and
thanked members of the Legislative Delegation for attending
the meeting. She mentioned education funding and early
College Academy as items in the schools draft legislative
program.
Dr. Casey welcomed the Legislative Delegation and thanked the
Chesterfield Technical Center Culinary Arts students for the
dinner provided. He stated the county is trying to be
business minded/friendly with a legislative request on
technology zones. He further stated the county is updating
the County Charter to eliminate outdated provisions.
Dr. Lane welcomed the Legislative Delegation and thanked them
for being engaged in Chesterfield County's education process.
He stated Chesterfield County is focused on bringing new and
innovative ideas into the classrooms.
Mr. Matt Harris, Budget Director, presented highlights of the
county's economic backdrop and FY2017 budget outlook. He
stated Blueprint Chesterfield was the county's extensive
effort to align resources with community priorities and a
citizen engagement campaign which identified the top three
community priorities of education, infrastructure/roads, and
public safety. He further stated the key takeaways for the
legislative delegation were: 1) local resource forecast looks
positive, but modest growth; 2) efforts to ensure resources
16-580
10/26/16
invested in line with community priorities; 3) feedback
focused on maintaining strong core services - areas where the
state is a valuable funding partner; 3) core services also
important to sustaining economic development successes; and,
4) crucial for state support to continue.
Dr. Lane addressed the Legislative Delegation regarding
Chesterfield County Schools' successful efforts to put two-
year degree programs into Chesterfield classrooms. He stated
Chesterfield anticipates having a two-year degree program in
every high school in the county within the next five years.
He asked the Delegation to consider legislation that mandates
the community colleges and four-year colleges consider dual -
enrollment students to be equal to students who are taking
courses on community college campuses. He stated by
implementing this program in Chesterfield, we can create a
program rigorous enough for Chesterfield County students to
have the opportunity to gain entrance into a four-year
college having earned their two-year degree in high school
through dual enrollment.
Delegate Cox stated a pilot concept of the two-year degree
program would be a good way to test it. He further stated if
Dr. Lane could show the program had been successful in the
past, it would benefit legislative efforts.
Dr. Lane stated the program is successfully operating in
school systems north of the river. He stated Chesterfield
County cannot partner with four-year colleges without asking
for permission from community colleges due to the way
regulations are written. He stated the program has been
scaled back and Chesterfield wants dual -enrollment students
to have the same benefit as community college students have
in transferring to four-year colleges.
Senator Dance stated the county is bold in the challenges
they have presented.
Delegate Ware commented on Blueprint Chesterfield and that
Chesterfield has the fourth largest employment gain among the
large counties. He inquired about the type of jobs the
number was referring to, and whether they were within the
county.
Mr. Harris stated he would provide detail on these jobs to
the Delegation.
Mr. Elswick requested the Delegation's continued support to
accomplish the county's goals and thanked the Delegation for
their efforts.
Delegate Cox discussed State funding for education and stated
the General Assembly has worked hard to send lottery proceeds
back to the localities and to match the proceeds despite the
state's $1.5 billion deficit. He further stated the
legislature and the county has a great partnership. He then
asked about the implementation of the GO Virginia legislation
as a way to improve the regional economy.
Dr. Casey stated Go Virginia is a tool to focus on jobs that
are closer to where the people live. He further stated Go
Virginia can provide matching funds, seed monies, or other
incentives. He stated the local regional councils are
16-581
10/26/16
PI
9
PI
cM
A
collaborative amongst themselves and understand the assets of
the entire region that they serve.
Dr. Lane commented that he appreciates the flexibility the
General Assembly has given to the county on the financial and
innovation side of education funding. He inquired whether any
thought had been given to detaching the strings tied to
teacher salary increases, and whether there was a plan to
guarantee the state match to the localities in the future.
Delegate Cox stated the General Assembly could look at
eliminating the requirement for a local match if the match
cannot be guaranteed on both sides.
Senator Dance stated the Delegation that represents
Chesterfield County is bipartisan in its representation of
the county. She further stated the team is working hard to
give Chesterfield desired outcomes.
Mr. Elswick stated Chesterfield has submitted 36 projects for
scoring under Smart Scale reflecting growth in the county and
its transportation needs. He further stated the county is
investing local money to jumpstart the projects. He requested
assistance with funding for transportation needs.
Senator Chase stated she is on the Transportation Committee
and would be happy to talk further about the issue.
Ms. Smith thanked the Legislative Delegation for coming to
the county to have these conversations. She further offered
the support of both the school system and the county to the
delegation.
On motion of Ms. Coyner, seconded by Mr. Erbach, the School
Board adjourned at 6:12 p.m. until October 28, 2016 at 1:30
p.m. for a joint work session of the Board of Supervisors and
the School Board in Room 502 at the County Administration
Building to discuss budget priorities.
Ayes: Smith, Coyner, Erbach, Siddiqi, Thompson.
Nays: None.
It was generally agreed that the Board of Supervisors recess
to the Public Meeting Room to continue the regularly
scheduled meeting.
Reconvening:
12. INVOCATION
The Honorable Leslie Haley, Midlothian District Supervisor,
gave the invocation.
13. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG OF THE UNITED STATES OF
AMERICA
Mr. Jesse Smith, Director of Transportation, led the Pledge
of Allegiance to the Flag of the United States of America.
16-582
10/26/16
14. RESOLUTIONS
There were no resolutions at this time.
15. FIFTEEN -MINUTE CITIZEN COMMENT PERIOD ON UNSCHEDULED
MATTERS
There were no requests to address the Board at this time.
16. REQUESTS FOR MANUFACTURED HOME PERMITS AND REZONING
PLACED ON THE CONSENT AGENDA TO BE HEARD IN THE
FOLLOWING ORDER: WITHDRAWALS/DEFERRALS - CASES WHERE THE
APPLICANT ACCEPTS THE RECOMMENDATION AND THERE IS NO
OPPOSITION- CASES WHERE THE APPLICANT DOES NOT ACCEPT
THE RECOMMENDATION AND/OR THERE IS PUBLIC OPPOSITION
WILL BE HEARD AT SECTION 18
1Acun711
In Bermuda Magisterial District, Chesterfield County Board of
Supervisors request conditional use to permit a farm (keeping
of horses) and amendment of zoning district map in a
Residential (R-7) District on 6.1 acres fronting the western
line of Quailoaks Avenue, across from Egee Drive. Density
will be controlled by zoning conditions or Ordinance
standards. The Comprehensive Plan suggests the property is
appropriate for Residential use (2.51 to 4.0 units per acre).
Tax IDs 793-667-3472, 3958, 4349, 4739, 5030, 5487, 6269 and
7050.
Mr. Turner presented a summary of Case 16SN0733 and stated
the Planning Commission and staff recommended approval
subject to the conditions. He accepted the conditions as
agent for the case.
Mr. Elswick called for public comment.
There being no one to address the issue, the public hearing
was closed.
On motion of Ms. Jaeckle, seconded by Mr. Holland, the Board
approved Case 16SN0733, subject to the following conditions:
1. Use: This Conditional Use approval shall be for a stock
farm use, which shall be limited to the keeping of a
maximum of three (3) horses. (P)
2. Non -Transferable Ownership: This Conditional Use
approval shall be granted exclusively to Shirley
Simpson, and shall not be transferable with the land.
(P)
3. Commercial Activity: No commercial activity, such as the
breeding or sale of animals, shall be permitted in
conjunction with this use. (P)
4. Animal Waste: All areas associated with the keeping of
horses (pastures, stables, shelters, etc.) shall be
cleaned and made free of waste on a regular basis. In
addition, the property owner shall employ a means of
eliminating any odor problems and propagation of
insects. (P)
16-583
10/26/16
K
D
lk
14
A
CEJ
5. Existing Improvements. The stable enclosure and pasture
area shall be located on the site as shown on Exhibit A,
dated August 18, 2016. (P)
Ayes: Elswick, Jaeckle, Winslow, Holland and Haley.
Nays: None.
1AQVn7aa
In Matoaca Magisterial District, Bonita M. Ramey and Claude
R. Ramey request a conditional use to permit a second
dwelling and amendment of zoning district map in an
Agricultural (A) District on 104.5 acres known as 12706
Bundle Road. Density will be controlled by zoning conditions
or Ordinance standards. The Comprehensive Plan suggests the
property is appropriate for Rural Residential/Agricultural.
Tax ID 740-642-8670.
Mr. Turner presented a summary of Case 16SN0734 and stated
the Planning Commission and staff recommended approval and
acceptance of the proffered conditions.
Ms. Bonita Ramey stated the recommendation is acceptable.
Mr. Elswick called for public comment.
David Ramey and Jennifer Ramey stated they are supportive of
the case.
On motion of Mr. Elswick, seconded by Ms. Haley, the Board
approved Case 16SN0734, and accepted the following proffered
conditions:
1. Occupancy of the second dwelling unit shall be limited
to: the occupants of the principal dwelling unit,
individuals related to them by blood, marriage, adoption
or guardianship, foster children, guests and any
domestic servants. (P)
2. For the purpose of providing record notice, within
thirty (30) days of approval of this request, a deed
restriction shall be recorded setting forth the
limitation in Condition 1. The deed book and page number
of such restriction and a copy of the restriction as
recorded shall be submitted to the Planning Department.
(P)
Ayes: Elswick, Jaeckle, Winslow, Holland and Haley.
Nays: None.
16SN0736
In Matoaca Magisterial District, Jacqueline S. Tomlin
requests conditional use planned development to permit a
business (fortune teller) incidental to a dwelling and
amendment of zoning district map in an Agricultural (A)
District on 1 acre known as 10446 River Road. Density will be
controlled by zoning conditions or Ordinance standards. The
Comprehensive Plan suggests the property is appropriate for
Residential Agricultural use (maximum of 0.5 dwellings per
acre). Tax ID 755-623-1535.
16-584
10/26/16
Mr. Turner presented a summary of Case 16SN0736 and stated
the Planning Commission and staff recommended approval
subject to the conditions.
Ms. Jacqueline Tomlin accepted the conditions.
Mr. Elswick called for public comment.
There being no one to address the issue, the public hearing
was closed.
On motion of Mr. Elswick, seconded by Ms. Haley, the Board
approved Case 16SN0736, subject to the following conditions:
1. Non -Transferable ownership: This Conditional Use approval
shall be granted exclusively to Jacqueline S. Tomlin, and
shall not be transferable with the land. (P)
2. Use: This Conditional Use approval shall be for the
operation of a fortune teller business, incidental to a
dwelling. (P)
3. Time Limitation: This Conditional Use shall be granted
for a period of five (5) years. (P)
4. Location of Use: The use shall be confined to the
existing dwelling. (P)
5. Employees and Clients: No employees shall be permitted
to work on the premises, other than family member
employees that live on the premises. No clients shall be
permitted on the property. (P)
6. Assembly & Group Instruction: Assembly or group
instruction on the premises shall be prohibited. (P)
7. Equipment/Vehicles. No more than one (1) vehicle
associated with the business shall be parked on the
premises. The vehicle shall not exceed 10,000 pounds or
have more than 2 axles. (P)
8. Signage: There shall be no signs identifying this use.
(P)
Ayes: Elswick, Jaeckle, Winslow, Holland and Haley.
Nays: None.
In Bermuda Magisterial District, Jack N. Harris requests
rezoning from Corporate Office (0-2) to Community Business
(C-3) and amendment of zoning district map on 2.1 acres
fronting 225 feet on the north line of Rivington Drive, 550
feet west of Branders Creek Drive. Density will be controlled
by zoning conditions or Ordinance standards. The
Comprehensive Plan suggests the property is appropriate for
Medium -High Density Residential (Minimum 4.0 to 8.0 dwellings
per acre). Tax ID 777-653-0605.
Mr. Turner presented a summary of Case 17SN0512 and stated
the Planning Commission and staff recommended approval and
acceptance of the proffered conditions.
16-585
10/26/16
Ic
J
Mr. Kerry Hutcherson, representing the applicant, accepted
the recommendation.
Mr. Elswick called for public comment.
There being no one to address the issue, the public hearing
was closed.
On motion of Ms. Jaeckle, seconded by Ms. Haley, the Board
approved Case 17SN0512 and accepted the following proffered
conditions:
The Applicant in this case, pursuant to Section 15.2-2298 of
the Code of Virginia (1950 as amended) and the Zoning
Ordinance of Chesterfield County, for himself and his
successors or assigns, proffers that the property known as
Chesterfield County Tax Identification Number 777-653-0605
("the Property") under consideration will be used according
to the following proffer(s) if, and only if, the request
submitted herewith is granted with only those conditions
agreed to by the Applicant. In the event this request is
denied or approved with conditions not agreed to by the owner
and Applicant, the proffer(s) shall immediately be null and
void and of no further force or effect.
1. Uses: Uses permitted shall be limited to the following:
a. Any permitted use in the C-2 District.
b. Carpenter and cabinetmakers' offices and display
rooms.
C. Contractors' offices and display rooms.
d. Electrical, plumbing, or heating supply sales,
service, and related display rooms.
e. Feed, seed, and ice sales.
f. Greenhouses or nurseries.
g. Home centers.
h. Recreational establishments, commercial -indoor,
including, but not limited to a senior -citizen's
center.
i. Repair services, excluding motor vehicle repair.
j. Restaurants, to include carry -out.
k. Schools - commercial, trade, vocational, and
training.
1. Secondhand and consignment stores, excluding motor
vehicle consignment lots.
M. Veterinary hospitals or clinics and/or commercial
kennels, excluding outdoor runs.
n. Outside storage, as accessory to a permitted use,
including, but not limited to: retail building
materials; construction equipment/materials;
feed/seed items, garden centers, greenhouses, hot
houses; miscellaneous materials for
retail/wholesale sales; provided that:
i. Such uses are screened from view of any
adjacent properties on which such uses are not
permitted or do not exist, and from areas
currently zoned R, R-TH, R -MF, A, O, MH, or I-
1.
ii. No more than ten percent of the gross floor
area of the principal use may be used for
outdoor storage.
iii. Site or architectural design, topography,
landscaping, setbacks or other features shall
16-586
10/26/16
be used to minimize the visibility of the
aforementioned outside storage uses as viewed
from limited access roads.
o. Continuous outside display of merchandise for sale,
as accessory to a permitted use, provided that the
use is limited to either of the following areas:
i. An area located under a covered pedestrian way
that does not exceed 16 feet in width where
other pedestrian ways are not obstructed,
where no more than five percent of the gross
floor area of the principal use is used for
outside display purposes; and
ii. An additional area which conforms to the
parking setback requirements of the district;
screened from view of adjacent properties on
which outside display is not permitted or does
not exist, A property designated on the
comprehensive plan for R, R-TH, R -MF, MH, A, O
or I-1 uses, and external roads; and this
display area plus any permitted outside
storage area does not exceed 10 percent of the
gross floor area of the principal use.
P. Prepared food and fruit and vegetable vendors,
provided that:
i. Only prepared food, fruits, and vegetables
shall be sold;
ii. They shall be permitted only on a lot or
parcel occupied by a permanent use;
iii. They shall be located where improved permanent
parking facilities are available for their
use, provided that the required minimum and
most convenient parking spaces for the
existing permanent use shall be used;
iv. Any temporary structure, vehicle, sign or
other material associated with or resulting
from the use shall be removed from the lot or
parcel no later than 24 hours following the
end of the temporary sale cessation of the
use; and
V. All vendor areas shall be located a minimum of
1,000 feet from any property in an R, R-TH, or
R -MF District or any property currently zoned
Agricultural and designated for residential
use on the comprehensive plan unless the sales
area is separate from the property by a
permanent building, provided that all such
areas shall be located in accordance with the
district's minimum yard setbacks. (P)
2. Architectural Com atibility: For the purposes of
architectural treatment, the Property shall be
considered . as part of a project consisting of
Chesterfield County Tax Identification Numbers 776-653-
9843; and 777-653-2931, 2949 and 4107. (P)
Ayes: Elswick, Jaeckle, Winslow, Holland and Haley.
Nays: None.
16-587
10/26/16
14
A
A
In Midlothian Magisterial District, Bharat Shah requests
amendment of conditional use planned development (Case
80SN0156) relative to uses and amendment of zoning district
map in a Community Business (C-3) District on 1.1 acres known
as 14008 Midlothian Turnpike. Density will be controlled by
zoning conditions or Ordinance standards. The Comprehensive
Plan suggests the property is appropriate for Village Fringe
Area uses. Tax ID 726-708-3588.
Mr. Turner presented a summary of Case 17SN0514 and stated
the Planning Commission and staff recommended approval and
acceptance of the proffered conditions.
Mr. Timothy Seldon, representing the applicant, accepted the
recommendation.
Mr. Elswick called for public comment.
There being no one to address the issue, the public hearing
was closed.
On motion of Ms. Haley, seconded by Mr. Holland, the Board
approved Case 17SN0514 and accepted the following proffered
conditions:
The Applicant hereby amends Condition 1 of Case 80SN0156 to
read as follows:
1. Uses. Permitted uses shall be uses permitted by right,
or with restrictions, in the Community Business (C-3)
District except for the uses listed below, which shall
be prohibited:
i.
Alternative Financial Institutions
ii.
Automobile Vehicle Sales, Repair,
Service and
Rental, including Automobile
Vehicle
Consignment lots
iii.
Automobile Vehicle Wash
iv.
Cocktail Lounges or Nightclubs
V.
Coin Laundry
vi.
Commercial Kennels
vii.
Communication towers
viii.
Fraternal Uses
ix.
Feed, seed and ice sales
X.
Funeral Home or Mortuary
xi.
Halfway Houses
xii.
Home Centers
xiii.
Hospitals
xiv.
Hotels
xv.
Indoor or Outdoor Flea Markets
xvi.
Liquor Store
xvii.
Material reclamation and recycling
centers
xviii.
Motor Vehicle Sales, Repair, Service and
Rental, including Motor Vehicle
Consignment
lots
xix.
Motor Vehicle Wash
xx.
Outside Public Address systems
xxi.
Park and ride lots
xxii.
Restaurant, fast food or drive-in
xxiii.
Tattoo Parlors
xxiv.
Taxidermies
xxv.
Theaters, including drive-in
16-588
10/26/16
xxvi. Veterinary Hospital with outside runs.
xxvii. Sign, computer controlled variable message
electronic
xxviii. Dwelling, townhouse
xxix. Warehouse, accessory to permitted use (P)
(Note: Except as amended herein, all previous conditions
of zoning approved in Case 80SN0156 shall remain in full
force and effect.)
2. External Lighting. Lighting along the perimeter of the
development adjacent to Midlothian Turnpike shall be of
a pedestrian scale. Light fixtures shall be installed
with a design consistent with the Midlothian Village
Guidelines and spaced as may be approved by the Planning
Department at time of site plan review. (P)
3. Road Improvement. Prior to the issuance of an occupancy
permit for any redevelopment or additional development,
as determined by the Transportation Department, a
concreate sidewalk shall be constructed along Midlothian
Turnpike (Route 60) from the existing sidewalk to
Winterfield Road. Any additional right-of-way (or
easements) required for the improvement shall be
dedicated, free and unrestricted, to Chesterfield
County. (T)
Ayes: Elswick, Jaeckle, Winslow, Holland and Haley.
Nays: None.
17SN0544
In Clover Hill Magisterial District, Northside Southside
Partners LLC requests amendment of conditional use planned
development (Case 85SN0074) relative to uses and amendment of
zoning district map in a Corporate Office (0-2) District on
1.9 acres known as 11531 Hull Street Road. Density will be
controlled by zoning conditions or Ordinance standards. The
Comprehensive Plan suggests the property is appropriate for
Corporate Office, Research and Development and Light
Industrial uses. Tax ID 741-682-5835.
Mr. Turner presented a summary of Case 17SN0544 and stated
the Planning Commission and staff recommended approval
subject to one condition.
Ms. Lindsey Burnett, representing the applicant, accepted the
condition.
Mr. Elswick called for public comment.
There being no one to address the issue, the public hearing
was closed.
On motion of Mr. Winslow, seconded by Mr. Holland, the Board
approved Case 17SN0544, subject to the following condition:
In addition to the uses permitted by Condition 2 of Case
85SN0074, the following use shall also be permitted:
a. Beauty Shop, limited to no more than 650 gross
square feet. (P)
16-589
10/26/16
It
Ic
PC
14
D
(Staff Note: Except as amended herein, all previous
conditions of zoning approved in Case 85SN0074 shall remain
in full force and effect.)
Ayes: Elswick, Jaeckle, Winslow, Holland and Haley.
Nays: None.
17SN0500
In Midlothian Magisterial District, Marjorie S. Elliott and
Michael B. Elliott request conditional use to permit
recreational equipment parking and storage and amendment of
zoning district map in a Residential (R-9) District on 0.3
acre known as 1730 Olde Coalmine Road. Density will be
controlled by zoning conditions or Ordinance standards. The
Comprehensive Plan suggests the property is appropriate for
Suburban Residential II use (2.0 to 4.0 dwellings per acre)
Tax ID 734-712-5839.
Mr. Turner presented a summary of Case 17SN0500 and stated
the Planning Commission recommended approval and acceptance
of the proffered conditions. He further stated staff
recommended denial because the parking location has
substantial visual impact on the adjoining neighbor and the
streetscape, and an alternative parking location is
available.
Mrs. Marjorie Elliott and Mr. Michael Elliott, stated the
Planning Commission's recommendation is acceptable.
Mr. Elswick called for public comment.
There being no one to address the issue, the public hearing
was closed.
On motion of Ms. Haley, seconded by Ms. Jaeckle, the Board
approved Case 17SN0500, subject to the following conditions:
1. Non -Transferable Ownership. This Conditional Use approval
shall be granted exclusively to Marjorie S. Elliott and
Michael B. Elliott, and shall not be transferable nor run
with the land. (P)
2. Use. This Conditional Use approval shall be for the
parking of one (1) recreational vehicle having no more
than two (2) axels and no greater than twenty-four (24)
feet in length. (P)
3. Location of Recreational Vehicle. The recreational
vehicle shall be parked within the front yard, as shown
on Exhibit A.
a. The parked recreational vehicle shall be setback a
minimum of ten (10) feet from the rear property
line.
b. The parked recreational vehicle shall be setback a
minimum of fifteen (15) feet from the corner side
property line. (P)
4. Landscaping. Evergreen plantings shall be installed
within the area identified as "Landscaping Area" on
Exhibit A to minimize the visibility of the recreational
16-590
10/26/16
vehicle from the street and adjacent properties. The
Landscaping Area shall include a minimum of two (2)
privets being a minimum of a 3 -gallon plant at the time
of planting and a minimum of two (2) eastern cedars with
a minimum initial height of three (3) feet. A plan
depicting the landscaping shall be submitted to the
Planning Department within thirty (30) days of the
approval of this request and vegetation shall be
installed within thirty (30) days of the approval of
such plan. Other types of evergreen plants may be
substituted for those identified in this condition as
approved by the Planning Department at the time of plan
review. (P)
Ayes: Elswick, Jaeckle, Winslow, Holland and Haley.
Nays: None.
17SN0510
In Clover Hill Magisterial District, John A. Flinn and Peggy
Flinn Norris request a conditional use to permit a business
(septic tank service business) incidental to a dwelling and
amendment of zoning district map in a Residential (R-7)
District on 0.8 acre known as 200 South Providence Road.
Density will be controlled by zoning conditions or Ordinance
standards. The Comprehensive Plan suggests the property is
appropriate for Residential use (2.51 to 4.0 dwelling units
per acre). Tax ID 759-704-2293.
Mr. Turner presented a summary of Case 17SN0510 and stated
the Planning Commission recommended approval subject to the
conditions. He further stated staff recommended denial of the
request because the operation has intensified since the
original application was approved in 1986, and the request
represents encroachment of commercial uses into an
established residential area.
Mr. John Norris, representing the applicants, stated the
applicants accept the proffered conditions.
Mr. Elswick called for public comment.
There being no one to address the issue, the public hearing
was closed.
On motion of Mr. Winslow, seconded by Ms. Jaeckle, the Board
approved Case 17SN0510, subject to the following conditions:
1. Use: This Conditional Use approval shall be for the
operation of a business (septic tank service business),
incidental to a dwelling. (P)
2. Non -Transferable Ownership: This Conditional Use approval
shall be granted exclusively to Peggy Flinn Norris and
John Flinn, and shall not be transferable with the land.
(P)
3. Time Limitation: This Conditional Use shall be granted
for a period of five (5) years. (P)
4. Location of Use: The use shall be confined to the
existing dwelling, accessory buildings and the parking
of vehicles in the graveled parking area that is noted
16-591
10/26/16
Lw--�
P]
A
on Exhibit A, dated August 12, 2016. All work and
operations associated with this business shall be
accomplished on the inside of the existing dwelling or
structures. There shall be no exterior additions or
alterations to the existing structures to accommodate
this use. (P)
5. Outside Storage: Outside storage of materials shall be
prohibited. (P)
6. Employees and Clients: No more than three (3) employees
shall be permitted to work on the premises, other than
family member employees that live on the premises. No
clients shall be permitted on the property. (P)
7. Equipment/Vehicles: As a part of this business, the
following equipment may be stored on the property:
a.
Two
(2)
tanker trucks
b.
Two
( 2 )
vans
C.
Two
(2)
trailers
d.
One
(1)
mini excavator
e.
One
(1)
skid steer.
All driveway and parking areas where these vehicles
travel or are parked shall be graveled. Vehicles and
equipment associated with the business shall be parked in
the area behind the fence and gate, screened from view of
South Providence Road and the adjoining properties to the
south and west. (P)
8. Effluent Storage in Vehicles: No vehicles associated
with this use may return to or be parked at this location
unless all effluent associated with this use has been
properly disposed of. (P)
9. Signage: There shall be no signs identifying this use.
(P)
10. Group Assembly: Group assembly connected with this
operation shall be prohibited. (P)
11. Hours of Operation: The operation of the business (septic
tank service business), to include the movement of
equipment, shall be limited to Monday through Friday from
7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. and Saturday from 8:00 a.m. to
12:00 p.m. There shall be no operation of the use on
Sunday. (P)
12. Deliveries: No deliveries shall be permitted before 8:00
a.m. and after 6:00 p.m. (P)
13. Fence, Driveway Gate & Landscaping: The following
improvements shall be installed or maintained on the
property.
a. Within ninety (90) days of approval of this request,
a six (6) foot tall opaque vinyl privacy fence and
an opaque vinyl driveway gate shall be constructed
as shown on Exhibit A. The existing portion of the
chain-link and slat fence and gate between the
dwelling and southern property line shall be
removed. In addition, the existing six (6) foot tall
16-592
10/26/16
fence chain-link and slat fence along the side and
rear property lines (as shown on Exhibit A) shall be
maintained. These fences and gate shall provide
complete screening of the parking area from South
Providence Road and the adjoining properties to the
north, south and west.
b. The driveway gate shall remain closed at all times,
except to permit ingress or egress for vehicles or
equipment to South Providence Road.
C. Within ninety (90) days of approval of this request,
a landscape plan shall be submitted to the Planning
Department for the approval of foundation and fence
plantings. The foundation and fence plantings shall
be required along the frontage of the dwelling and
the fence visible to South Providence Road. Beds
shall be a minimum 4 foot wide measured from the
dwelling foundation or base of the fence with
plantings spaced a maximum of 5 feet apart. Beds
shall include a mix of small evergreen shrubs having
an initial minimum height of 3 feet, vertical accent
shrubs having an initial minimum height of 4 feet or
small evergreen trees having an initial minimum
height of 4 feet. Approved plantings shall be
installed prior to May 1, 2017. (P)
14. Solid Waste Storage Area: The solid waste storage area
shall be relocated to the area depicted on Exhibit A
within thirty (30) days of approval. The solid waste
storage area shall be screened by the existing fence and
be serviced according to Ordinance requirements. (P)
Ayes: Elswick, Jaeckle, Winslow, Holland and Haley.
Nays: None.
16SN0724
In Clover Hill Magisterial District, PI Tower Development,
LLC requests conditional use to permit a communications tower
in a Residential (R-7) District on 2.3 acres of a 5.8 acre
parcel known as 9600 Reams Road. Density will be controlled
by zoning conditions or Ordinance standards. The
Comprehensive Plan suggests the property is appropriate for
Suburban Residential II use (2.0 to 4.0 dwellings per acre).
Tax ID 750-701 Part of 8674.
Ms. Jane Peterson presented a summary of Case 17SN0510 and
stated the Planning Commission recommended approval subject
to the conditions noting that the tower would be in a wooded
location and size of acreage and monopine design would
minimize visual impacts, and the tower design and height
would maximize number of carriers. She further stated staff
recommended denial because the proposal does not comply with
the Public Facilities Plan or the Telecommunications Tower
Siting Policy.
Mr. Will Shewmake, representing the applicant, stated towers
are a necessity and need to be retrofitted for older
neighborhoods. He further stated the need for better coverage
in the area and the applicant's plan will conceal the tower
and minimize visual impacts on the area. He stated the
Planning Commission's recommendation and proffered conditions
are acceptable to the applicant.
16-593
10/26/16
F
E
E
IN
A
In response to Mr. Winslow's questions, Mr. Shewmake stated
the applicant looked at 20 sites and drove the area looking
for various sites for placement of the tower. He further
stated the land on which the tower would be placed will not
be subdivided and a proffer was submitted to that effect.
Mr. Elswick called for public comment.
Ms. Tammy McCoy Davis stated the photographs shown do not
accurately depict the view of the tower placement. She
presented photographs of a balloon test showing the balloon
is visible from her property. She inquired as to what other
sites were pursued for the tower site. She cited the Bond and
Xue Proximate Impact Study. She further cited the Bond and
Wang Transaction Based Market Study showing a decrease in
adjacent property values. She stated tower placement will
negatively impact the value and resale of homes in the area.
Mr. Thomas Davis stated he has not experienced cellular
service issues in the area that is proposed for the tower and
therefore does not understand the need for the tower.
Mr. Shewmake stated in rebuttal, visual impacts to the area
will be minimal with proffered conditions.
In response to Mr. Holland's concerns, Mr. Shewmake stated
the applicant has looked at shorter towers, but being less
than 150 feet will reduce the number of carriers the tower
could support and ultimately require additional shorter
towers. He further stated the availability of cellular
coverage will increase the appeal of the neighborhood to
younger families.
Ms. Peterson stated in response to Mr. Winslow's concerns the
slickstick would blend with the hardwoods in the area, and
the monopine would blend with the existing trees in the area.
She further stated multiple slicksticks would be required to
support multiple carriers and provide the same coverage as
one monopine.
Mr. Winslow shared two case studies with the Board showing no
decline in home sale prices and assessment values in the
vicinities of towers.
Discussion ensued regarding the necessity of cellular towers
throughout the county.
on motion of Mr. Winslow, seconded by Ms. Jaeckle, the Board
approved Case 16SNO724 and accepted the following proffered
conditions:
1. The tower and access entrance shall be sited on the
property in the location shown on the plans prepared by
B C Architects Engineers, revised August 8, 2016, and
titled "Proposed 148' Monopine in a New Fenced Compound"
(the "Plans"). (P)
2. There shall be no signs permitted to identify this use.
(P)
3. The base of the tower shall be enclosed by a wood board -
on -board fence designed to preclude trespassing and to
screen the base of the tower and ground -mounted equipment
from adjacent properties (the "Fence"). The Fence shall
have a height equal to or greater than the height of the
16-594
10/26/16
tallest ground-based equipment or shelter (excluding the
tower) installed within the 80' x 80, fenced compound.
The fence shall be stained or painted a neutral color.
Sufficient room between the fence and the lease boundary
line shall be maintained to accommodate evergreen
plantings having an initial height and space to provide a
buffer around the fenced compound. A detailed plan
depicting this requirement shall be submitted to the
Planning Department for approval in conjunction with
final site plan review. (P)
4. The color, design and lighting system for the tower
shall be as follows:
a. The tower shall be a monopine design consistent
with the tower elevation contained in the Plans.
The lower braches on the monopine shall be located
no higher on the tower than the height of the
surrounding tree canopy, as determined by the
Planning Department. In no event shall the lower
branches be located higher on the tower than 100
feet from the ground elevation of the tower site.
b. The tower shall not be lighted.
C. No satellite dish or microwave antennas shall be
attached to the telecommunications tower.
d. The tower color shall blend with surrounding
vegetation, as acceptable to the Planning Department.
(P)
5. Any building or mechanical equipment shall comply with
the Zoning Ordinance relative to architectural treatment
of building exteriors and screening of mechanical
equipment in 0, C, and I Districts. (P)
6. Prior to use of this telecommunications tower, the owner
of the tower shall obtain approval of the structural
integrity by a registered professional engineer licensed
in Virginia and a copy of the report file with the
Planning Department. (P)
7. The tower shall not exceed a height of 150 feet, which
includes a 2 foot lighting rod. (P)
8. At such time that the tower ceases to be used for
communications purposes for a period exceeding twelve
(12) consecutive months, the owner/developer shall
dismantle and remove the tower and all associated
equipment from the property. (P)
9. Except for access and any necessary utilities, a tree
preservation area shall be provided outside the compound
on the entire leased portion of the property identified
on the Plans. Within this area, trees a minimum of four
inches in caliper shall be retained. Tree caliper shall
be measured six inches above grade. A plan depicting
this requirement shall be submitted in conjunction with
site plan review for the tower. (P)
10. Use of the property shall be limited to a 150 foot tall
communications tower designed as a monopine. (P)
Ayes: Elswick, Jaeckle, Winslow, Holland and Haley.
Nays: None.
16-595
10/26/16
It
P]
LIJ
A
16SN0717
Ms. Darla Orr presented a summary of Case 16SN0717 and stated
both the Planning Commission and staff recommended denial
because the uses introduce transient occupancy into the
residential neighborhood impacting the use and enjoyment of
area properties for single-family uses. She further stated
the conditions would not fully mitigate the impact on the
neighborhood. She stated the commercial tourist home is using
the web application Air B & B to book the tourist home. She
further stated the applicants have offered conditions with
the case, limiting the usage.
The applicants were not present.
Mr. Elswick called for public comment.
Ms. Luann Proebstle stated she does not support the request
because she is concerned about transient individuals in the
neighborhood; lack of transparency of the business; and the
quality of neighborhood life and safety.
Mr. Melvin Diaz stated he does not support the request
because the home was purchased in a residential neighborhood,
not a multi -use neighborhood.
Mr: Winfree Gilespie stated he does not support the request
because of traffic and safety concerns.
Ms. Angela Shield stated she does not support the request
because of traffic and safety concerns.
Ms. Jenny Arendohl stated she does not support the request
due to the lack of regulation by the county.
Ms. Nataly Amifrani stated she does not support the request
because the neighborhood has a standard that will be
diminished if the business is allowed in the neighborhood.
Mr. Garland Smith stated he does not support the request
because it will have a negative impact on the resale value of
his home and denial will protect the property values in the
neighborhood.
Ms. Wilhelmina Carter stated she does not support the request
because of safety concerns.
Mr. Jerry Dirk stated he does not support the request because
of the transient nature of the business.
Ms. Mary Marshall stated she does not support the request
because it would degrade the aesthetics of the neighborhood
and her property, and she does not want a hotel in her
neighborhood.
Ms. Gayle Payne stated she does not support this request
because of the transient nature of the business. She further
stated she is concerned the business owners have not paid
appropriate taxes.
Ms. Gloria Walters stated she does not support this request
because she purchased her home in a residential area, not a
commercial area, and she does not want Air B&B in her
neighborhood.
16-596
10/26/16
No one else came forward to speak to this request.
Mr. Holland thanked the citizens who came to speak. He
stated the conditions stated by the application will not
appropriately mitigate the impact on the residential
neighborhood, and the applicants have been cited twice for
zoning violations. He further stated the Planning Commission
and staff are suggesting denial of the application.
Mr. Holland then made a motion, seconded by Mr. Winslow, for
the Board to deny Case 16SN0717.
Ms. Jaeckle stated when a commercial entity requests to be
located in a residential neighborhood the support of the
residents is needed.
Mr. Winslow stated a bill was put into the General Assembly
to attempt to regulate Air B&B businesses within the State of
Virginia. He further stated there are studies being done to
determine impacts and provide guidance to localities.
Mr. Elswick thanked the speakers for their interest and
advised them to follow the item through the General Assembly.
Ayes: Elswick, Jaeckle, Winslow, Holland and Haley.
Nays: None.
17. PUBLIC HEARINGS
17.A. TO CONSIDER AMENDING SECTION 9-14 OF THE COUNTY CODE
RELATED TO PROCEDURES FOR APPEALING REAL ESTATE
ASSESSMENTS
Mr. Mincks stated this date and time has been advertised for
a public hearing for the Board to consider an amendment to
Section 9-14 of the County Code related to procedures for
appealing real estate assessments. He stated the amendment
will eliminate the requirement of a citizen having to appear
in person to the Real Estate Assessor to appeal their
assessment. He further stated the postmark would define the
date a receipt of objection to an assessment is filed.
Mr. Elswick called for public comment.
There being no one to address the issue, the public hearing
was closed.
On motion of Mr. Jaeckle, seconded by Mr. Winslow, the Board
adopted the following ordinance:
AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE CODE OF THE COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD,
1997, AS AMENDED, BY AMENDING AND RE-ENACTING SECTION 9-14 OF
THE REAL ESTATE TAX ORDINANCE RELATING TO ASSESSMENTS AND
REASSESSMENTS
BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield
County:
(1) That Section 9-14 of the Code of the County of
Chesterfield, 1997, as amended, is amended and re-enacted to
read as follows:
CHAPTER 9
16-597
10/26/16
It
lk
A
A
REAL ESTATE ASSESSMENTS
Sec. 9-14. - Real estate assessments and reassessments—
Procedures.
The assessor and the board of equalization shall follow
the following procedures in the assessment of real estate in
the county:
(a) The real estate assessment office shall notify each
affected taxpayer in writing on or before February
1 of any year in which the assessor makes a new or
changed assessment. The notice shall be mailed to
the last known address shown on the county land
books.
(b) Any affected taxpayer, or person with a substantial
legal or equitable interest in the property
involved, or any duly appointed representative of
such persons, or any authorized representative of
the county board of supervisors may appear before
the assessor to present objections to the
assessment by filing a written protest on forms
provided by the assessor. The objections shall be
filed with the office of real estate assessments by
March 15 of the year in which the assessor makes a
new or changed assessment. The postmark date shall
be considered the date of receipt of the
objections. An executed and properly notarized
letter from the property owner designating an
appointed representative for the taxpayer shall be
presumed to be a valid designation from the
taxpayer, and the person whose signature is
notarized shall be presumed to have the authority
to designate such representative on behalf of the
taxpayer.
(c) Such person may also, after filing a written
protest with and appearing before the assessor as
provided in subsection (b), file a request for
relief of the assessment with the board of
equalization no later than April 15 of the year in
which the assessor makes a new or changed
assessment. The request shall be made on forms
prescribed by the board of equalization and made
available through the office of real estate
assessments. The postmark date shall be considered
the date of receipt of the request. The board of
equalization of real estate assessments shall
provide all those requesting relief an opportunity
to be heard in person, with witnesses, and by
counsel, but may also allow submissions of
memoranda verified under oath.
E
(2) That this ordinance shall become effective immediately
upon adoption.
Ayes: Elswick, Jaeckle, Winslow, Holland and Haley.
Nays: None.
16-598
10/26/16
17.B. TO CONSIDER AMENDING SECTION 14-23 OF THE COUNTY CODE
PROVIDING FOR APPROVAL FOR SERVING ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES
FOR AFTER-HOURS EVENTS AT COUNTY LIBRARIES BY THE
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR OR HIS DESIGNEE INSTEAD OF THE
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
Mr. Mincks stated this date and time has been advertised for
a public hearing for the Board to consider an amendment to
Section 14-23 of the County Code providing for approval for
serving alcoholic beverages for after-hours events at county
libraries by the County Administrator or his designee instead
of the Board of Supervisors.
Mr. Elswick called for public comment.
There being no one to address the issue, the public hearing
was closed.
On motion of Mr. Holland, seconded by Ms. Haley, the Board
adopted the following ordinance:
AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE CODE OF THE COUNTY
OF CHESTERFIELD, 1997, AS AMENDED, BY AMENDING
AND RE-ENACTING SECTION 14-23 RELATING TO CONSUMING OR
SERVING ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES IN COUNTY PARKS, COUNTY
LIBRARIES, AND OTHER COUNTY PROPERTY
BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield
County:
(1) That Section 14-23 of the Code of the County of
Chesterfield, 1997, as amended, is amended and re-enacted to
read as follows:
Sec. 14-23. Drinking alcoholic beverages, or tendering same
to another, in a county park or at other county facilities.
(a) No person shall possess opened alcoholic beverage
containers or drink an alcoholic beverage or
tender a drink of an alcoholic beverage to another
in a county park or on county property provided,
however, that alcoholic beverages may be served
and consumed at an event held at the following
locations: Mid -Lothian Mines, Henricus, Eppington,
Castlewood, Magnolia Grange, and at the senior
center at Huguenot Park, and at the county
government complex at specific locations approved
and as conditioned by the board of supervisors
after obtaining a valid banquet license issued by
the state department of alcohol beverage control
and agreeing to comply with the terms of a special
permit issued by the county administrator. The
county department of parks and recreation shall
promulgate regulations for the issuance of permits
authorized by this section.
(b) If approved by the County Administrator or his
designee, alcoholic beverages may be served and
consumed at County libraries for events conducted
by or in conjunction with the Friends of the
Library; provided that no such event shall be
approved unless it is to be conducted during hours
when the library is closed to the public. In no
16-599
10/26/16
lk
F
P]
case shall such an event take place unless a
request for approval is made to the County
Administrator at least thirty (30) days prior to
the date for the proposed fund raising event. The
County Administrator may waive the 30 -day
requirement upon a showing of good cause and if he
determines that there is sufficient time for staff
to review the request and recommend appropriate
action. The County Administrator or his designee
may impose conditions on the granting of such
approval in order to ensure the health, safety,
and welfare of the public and the attendees of any
such event. Any such approval by the County
Administrator shall be automatically revoked if
any condition so imposed is not met.
(c) No person shall possess opened alcoholic beverage
containers on any county property used for a
school or on any street, road, or highway located
in the county.
(d) Violation of this section shall constitute a class
4 misdemeanor.
(2) That this ordinance shall become effective
immediately upon adoption.
Ayes: Elswick, Jaeckle, Winslow, Holland -and Haley.
Nays: None.
17.C. TO CONSIDER PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO THE COUNTY CODE
RELATED TO BICYCLE FACILITIES (BICYCLE, PEDESTRIAN AND
SHARED USE PATHS), BUFFERS IN COMMON AREAS AND CORNER
SIDE YARD SETBACKS AND PROPOSED EMINENT DOMAIN POLICY
Mr. Ray Cash stated this date and time has been advertised
for a public hearing for the Board to consider proposed
amendments to the County Code related to bicycle facilities,
buffers in common areas and corner side yard setbacks, as
well as the proposed eminent domain policy. He provided
details of the proposed ordinance amendments. He stated the
ordinance amendment will permit a 20 percent lot -size
reduction for certain residential subdivision lots abutting a
buffer along a road where the buffer is provided in common
area. He further stated the bikeways and trails chapter calls
for an ordinance to be established that would require the
construction of bikeways that are shown on the bikeways and
trails plan with new development. He then stated in preparing
the ordinance amendment, focus was on certain areas such as
setback relief, incentive to allow for certain buffers to be
inclusive of bikeways, and allow for a reduction of the road
buffer in residential areas to accommodate the bikeway. He
stated the amendment also provides for an incentive, which
may grow over time, in regards to reduction in required
parking spaces where developers provided bicycle spaces. He
further stated the provision for certain residential
subdivision lots that abut a bikeway, to have a lot -size
reduction of up to 20 percent, would help to preserve
developer lot yield that could have been lost through
provision of bikeway. He further stated the Eminent Domain
Policy provides that eminent domain authority will not be
used in order to acquire property or easements to provide
bikeways located outside of right-of-way proposed or intended
16-600
10/26/16
to be maintained by VDOT. He stated staff recommends adoption
of the ordinance amendments.
Mr. Elswick called for public comment.
Mr. Freddy Boisseau, a resident of the Bermuda District,
stated he does not support this request because the changes
will negatively impact future residents with smaller lot
sizes, and may affect the value of the property, and make
properties less desirable. He further stated the burden
should be placed on the developers and not the future
residents of the county by minimizing the lot sizes.
Ms. Melinda Aileo stated she supports the request because it
provides more transportation options for citizens.
Ms. Racheal Jordan stated she supports the request because it
provides options for economic growth the county and safer
biking opportunities for all citizens.
Ms. Sabrina Adams stated she supports the request because it
makes the community more pedestrian accessible as well as
offers more transportation opportunities to citizens.
Ms. Miriam Ford, a resident of the Midlothian District,
stated she supports the request because she is a bicycle
commuter and the county needs additional, safe pedestrian
trails.
Ms. Jarica Davis, a resident of the Midlothian District,
stated she supports the request because the county needs safe
pathways for pedestrians throughout the county.
Mr. Ken Robertson stated he supports the request because this
ordinance provides for healthy lifestyle opportunities for
citizens.
Mr. Joe Scarp stated he supports the request because the
ordinance provides additional transportation opportunities
for county citizens.
Ms. Virginia Summers stated she does not support the request
because the pathways will not reduce healthcare problems.
Mr. Mark Endries, a resident of the Dale District, stated he
supports the request because the bikeway/walkway will be an
amenity to the county citizens.
Jerry Truxell stated he supports the request because the plan
would develop Chesterfield County and be an attractive
amenity to proposed businesses.
There being no one else to address the issue, the public
hearing was closed.
In response to Ms. Jaeckle's concerns, Mr. Cash stated the
setbacks will be inclusive of the bikeway and that required
landscaping was to be adjusted accordingly so as to have the
design be aesthetically pleasing to the community and fit
with the character of the area.
In response to Mr. Winslow's comments, Mr. Cash stated the
language of "landscaping or other design measures shall be
provided" leaves some leeway for the Planning Department to
work with the developer to determine the appropriate amount
of landscaping or other design based upon the site.
16-601
10/26/16
It
W
9
In response to Mr. Holland's comments regarding policy
language "gifts and dedications," Mr. Cash stated Item 1 is
something that does not require eminent domain authority and
therefore, the intent is to strike Item 1 from number 4.
Discussion ensued regarding the language related to the
landscaping requirement.
Mr. Mincks stated the landscaping language should read
"Landscaping shall be proportionately reduced by the area
occupied by the bikeway."
Discussion ensued regarding additional documentation
presented by Ms. Jaeckle.
Mr. Elswick stated he would have preferred an ordinance
rather than a policy because the citizens of Matoaca pay
taxes on their land and the county will develop the land for
residents by putting bikeways and trails on their land. He
further stated the maintenance costs need to be taken into
consideration prior to approval of the development of the
bikeways or trails. He inquired about a cost for the appeals
process in Section 19.1-208 and 19.1-30.
In response to Mr. Elswick concerns, Mr. Turner stated the
administrative appeal would be to the Planning Commission, if
the result of the appeal was not satisfactory, there would
then be an appeal to the Courts.
Mr. Winslow stated that he wanted an appeals process placed
in the ordinance. He further stated he supports efforts to
add maintenance costs into the plan.
Mr. Mincks clarified that the approval process is an
administrative appeal to the Planning Commission, with the
next step being court involvement.
Mr. Holland stated he would support the change in language
regarding the appeal process.
Mr. Elswick stated the plan says "bikeways shall be provided"
and there is no relief other than an appeal to the Planning
Commission or to the court.
Mr. Turner stated it will be law if the Board adopts the
ordinance.
Mr. Elswick stated if the ordinance is passed, the county
must act unless the Planning Commission grants relief.
Mr. Mincks stated the Board should vote on the ordinance and
then vote on policy.
Mr. Holland made a motion, seconded by Ms. Jaeckle, for the
Board to adopt the proposed ordinance amendments, subject to
Section 19.1-209.B. being amended to allow required
landscaping to be proportionately reduced by the area
occupied by a bikeway and Section 19.1-208. being amended to
allow maintenance cost to be considered when determining the
feasibility of construction of a bikeway.
Mr. Elswick called for a vote on the motion of Mr. Holland,
seconded by Mr. Jaeckle, for the Board to adopt the following
ordinance:
16-602
10/26/16
AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE CODE OF THE COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD,
1997, AS AMENDED, BY AMENDING AND REENACTING SECTIONS
19.1-27, 19.1-30, 19.1-53, 19.1-61, 19.1-66, 19.1-71, 19.1-76, 19.1-81, 19.1-86, 19.1-92,
19.1-97, 19.1-133, 19.1-208, 19.1-209, 19.1-210, 19.1-211, 19.1-212, 19.1-231, 19.1-236,
19.1-239, 19.1-262, 19.1-263, 19.1-264, 19.1-274, 19.1-304, 19.1-306, 19.1-369, 19.1-550,
and 19.1-570 OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE RELATING TO BIKEWAYS
BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County:
(1) That Sections 19.1-27, 9.1-30, 19.1-53, 19.1-61, 19.1-66, 19.1-71, 19.1-76, 19.1-81,
19.1-86, 19.1-92, 19.1-97, 19.1-133, 19.1-208, 19.1-209, 19.1-210, 19.1-211, 19.1-212,
19.1-231, 19.1-236, 19.1-239, 19.1-262, 19.1-263, 19.1-264, 19.1-274, 19.1-304, 19.1-306,
19.1-369, 19.1-550, and 19.1-570 of the Code of the County of Chesterfield, 1997, as
amended, are amended and re-enacted, to read as follows:
See. 19.1-27. Site Plans Generally.
Chanter 19.1
ZONING
000
111
F. Site Plan Reauired Information. Plans shall be prepared in one or more sheets if
necessary to facilitate review and approval. If prepared in more than one sheet,
match lines shall clearly indicate where sheets join and each sheet shall contain an
overall sketch plan showing the relationship of improvements on each sheet. Scale
shall be 1 inch equals 100 feet or larger for all plan sheets showing buildings or
building lots, and at least 1 inch equals 600 feet for all other plan sheets.
In addition to other information as may be required by this chapter for applications,
a site plan shall include the following information where applicable, and if
applicable, existing and proposed improvements or landscaping:
111
• Roads, parking, buildings, pedestrian access and bikeways:
o roads; entrances, exits, parking to include handicapped and loading
spaces; number of spaces; length and width of spaces; width of
drives; and pavement design detail;
o sidewalks;
o bikeways;
o buildings locations, including distances between buildings; and
o building details including architectural elevations or renderings,
number of stories, gross square feet of each floor, number of
dwelling units, number of lodging rooms in hotel or motel, and
height.
C. Appeals and Transfers.
1. Eligibility and Time Limits for Appeal of Decision or Transfer Request.
16-603
10/26/16
P]
P]
A
a. Applicant. If the planning department approves or. disapproves the plan and
the applicant disagrees with the final decision, he may file a written appeal
with the planning commission within 15 days of the date of the decision.
b. Aggrieved Person. An aggrieved person may request in writing within 15
days of the date of the decision that the application be decided by the
planning commission instead of the planning department. The transfer
request shall explain how the development shown on the plan will adversely
affect the person and is limited to the following matters:
o land use transitions;
o buffers and screening;
o zoning approval conditions;
o architectural treatment;
o features affecting nearby residential areas;
o access and internal circulation;
o Chesapeake Bay Preservation area delineation;
o Improvement sketch processing;
o drainage;
o water and wastewater line location; or
o features affecting public safety.
In addition for the purposes of bikeways as provided in Section 19.1-208, transfer of review
may be requested in accordance with this section provided that the person shall not be
aggrieved solely because they would be reasonably calculated to use such bikeway.
111
Sec. 19.1-53. Restricted l Ises Listed as "R" or "RS".
R -C District:
a. Use is located within the conservation area required by Section 19.1-86.;
b. Maximum of 10 percent, but no less than 2 acres, of the designated
conservation areas is used for community buildings and active recreation
facilities (tennis courts, swimming pools, etc.) and accessory parking;
c. Facilities and related parking are located and designed to minimize impacts
on rural vistas, historic sites and natural resources;
d. With the exception of playground areas (i.e., areas accommodating swings,
jungle gyms, or similar such facilities), outdoor playfields, courts,
swimming pools and similar active recreational areas are set back 100 feet
from single family residential lot lines and 50 feet from roads except when
the ultimate right-of-way has been expanded solely to accommodate a
bikeway required by Sec. 19.1-208, then the setbacks shall be measured
without including the expanded right-of-way. Indoor facilities or parking are
permitted within the 100 feet. Within the 100 foot setback, a 50 foot buffer,
planted at a density of 2.5 times Perimeter Landscaping C, is provided along
the perimeter of active recreational facilities except where adjacent to a
road;
e. Playground areas (i.e., areas accommodating swings, jungle gyms or similar
such facilities) are set back a minimum of 40 feet from property lines. A 40
foot buffer, planted with Perimeter Landscaping C, is provided along the
perimeter of the facilities except where adjacent to roads;
f. Outside public address systems or speakers are not allowed; and
g. Trails are set back 25 feet from property adjacent to the subdivision or single
family residential lot line within the subdivision.
111
16-604
10/26/16
iec. 19.1-61. Required Conditions 11-88 District.
In addition to the other requirements of this chapter, the conditions specified in this
section shall be met in an R-88 District.
A. Lot and Building Standards.
TableRequiredons.. District
'
A. Lot Standards
1. Lot area and width
a. Area (square feet) 88,000
b. Width (feet)
1) Fronting on major arterial 300
2) Fronting on other road 150
2. Lot coverage (maximum %) 20
B. Road Frontage for lots intended for dwelling purposes (feet)
1. Family subdivision lot 15
2. Other lots
a. Permanent cul-de-sac 30
b. Radius of a loop street 30
c. Other roads [41 50
C. Principal Building Setbacks (feet)151
1. Front and
a. Non cul-de-sac 75
b. Permanent cul-de-sac 25
2. Interior side yard 40
3. Corner side yard
a. Through lot, lot back to back with another corner lot, or lot
backing to open sace or common area 171 40
b. Other lot 75
4. Rear yard
a. Non through lot 50
b. Through lot 75
D. Principal Building Heights (maximum)
1. Midlothian Core and
Chester Corridor East Special Design Districts
Lesser of 2.5 stories or 30 feet
2. Other
Lesser of 3 stories or 40 feet
E. Accessory Building Requirements
Subject to Section 19.1-304
Notes for Table 19.1-61.A.
[1] For lots not having direct access onto a major arterial road, lot area may be reduced to 65,340 square
feet or 43,560 square feet with use of public water and wastewater. If lot area is reduced, the maximum
number of lots permitted shall be based upon the calculation as shown in Figure 19.1-61.A.
[2] Subject to the provisions of Chapter 12 relative to use of private onsite water and wastewater facilities,
the area of a lot which shares a common boundary with a buffer or bikeway may be reduced in
accordance with Sec. 19.1-306.
[3] For flag lots, road frontage may be reduced to 30 feet.
[4] Frontage on the terminus of a stub street does not meet the requirements for road frontage unless
through the preliminary plat review process it is determined that extension of the stub street is not
needed to serve future development.
[5] Setbacks may be impacted by Buffer, Setbacks --Generally, Permitted Yard Encroachments for
Principal Buildings, Floodplain, Chesapeake Bay or Upper Swift Creek Watershed regulations.
[6] Minimum setbacks shall be increased where necessary to obtain the required lot width at the front
building line.
[7] Open space or common area shall be a minimum of 15 feet wide for the entire length of the rear
property line.
[8] Height limits are subject to Article IV, Division 2.
16-605
10/26/16
P]
E
A
A
In addition to the other requirements of this chapter, the
conditions specified in this section shall be met in an R-
40 District.
A. Lot and Building Standards
I'able 19.1-66. A. ReqUired Coiiditioiis R-40 District
A. Lot Standards
1. Lot area and width
a. Area (square feet)
40,000 111121
b. Width (feet)
150
2. Lot coverage maximum %)
20
B. Road Frontage for lots intended for dwelling
oses feet
1. Family subdivision lot
15
2. Other lots
a. Permanent cul-de-sac
30
b. Radius of a loop street
30
c. Other roads 141
50
C. Principal Building Setbacks feet)
1. Front yard
a. Non cul-de-sac
60
b. Permanent cul-de-sac
25
2. Interior side yard
20
3. Corner side and
a. Lots recorded on, or after, 4/1/1974
1) Through lot, lot back to back with
another corner lot, or lot backing to
open sace or common area 171
30
2) Other lot
55
b. Lots recorded prior to 4/1/1974
30
4. Rear yard
a. Non through lot
50
b. Through lot
60
D. Principal Building Heights maximum
1. Midlothian Core and
Chester Corridor East Special Design
Districts
Lesser of 2.5
stories or 30 feet
2. Other
Lesser of 3 stories
or 40 feet
E. Accessory Building Requirements
Subject to Section
19.1-304
Notes for Table 19.1-66.A.
1] Lot area requirements
0. may be impacted by the
availability of public
utilities. Refer to
Chapter 12.
[2] The area of a lot which
shares a common
boundary with a buffer or
bikeway may be reduced
in accordance with Sec.
19.1-306.
[3] For flag lots, road
frontage may be reduced
to 30 feet.
[4] Frontage on the terminus
of a stub street does not
meet the requirements
for road frontage unless
through the preliminary
plat review process it is
determined that
extension of the stub
street is not needed to
serve future
development.
[5] Setbacks may be
impacted by Buffer,
Setbacks --Generally,
Permitted Yard
Encroachments for
Principal Buildings,
Floodplain, Chesapeake
Bay or Upper Swift
Creek Watershed
regulations.
[6] Minimum setbacks shall
be increased where
necessary to obtain the
required lot width at the
front building line.
[7] Open space or common
area shall be a minimum
of 15 feet wide for the
entire length of the rear
property line.
[8] Height limits are subject
to Article IV, Division 2.
10/26/16
In addition to the other requirements of this chapter, the conditions specified in this
section shall be met in an R-25 District.
A. Lot and Building Standards.
Table•Cmiditioils R-25 District
A. Lot Standards
1. Lot area and width
a. Area (square feet)
25,000 111121
b. Width (feet)
120
2. Lot coverage (maximum %)
1 25
B. Road Frontage for lots intended for dwelling
purposes (feet)
1. Family subdivision lot
15
2. Other lots
a. Permanent cul-de-sac
30
b. Radius of a loop street
30
c. Other roads 141
50
C. Principal Building Setbacks (feet) 151
1. Front yard
a. Non cul-de-sac
50
b. Permanent cul-de-sac
25
2. Interior side yard
15
3. Corner side yard
a. Through lot, lot back to back with another
corner lot, or lot backing to open space or
common area [71
25
b. Other lot
45
4. Rear yard
a. Non through lot
40
b. Through lot
50
D. Principal Building Heights (maximum)
1. Midlothian Core and
Chester Corridor East Special Design
Districts
Lesser of 2.5 stories
or 30 feet
2. Other
Lesser of 3 stories
or 40 feet
E. Accessory Building Requirements
Subject to Section
19.1-304
Notes for Table 19.1-71.A.
[ 1 ] Lot area requirements may
be impacted by the
availability of public
utilities. Refer to Chapter
12.
[2] The area of a lot which
shares a common boundai
with a buffer or bikeway
may be reduced in
accordance with Sec. 19.1
306.
[3] For flag lots, road frontage
may be reduced to 30 feet.
[4] Frontage on the terminus c
a stub street does not meet
the requirements for road
frontage unless through the
preliminary plat review
process it is determined thz
extension of the stub street
is not needed to serve
future development.
[5] Setbacks may be impacted
by Buffer, Setbacks --
Generally, Permitted Yard
Encroachments for
Principal Buildings,
Floodplain, Chesapeake
Bay or Upper Swift Creek
Watershed regulations.
[6] Minimum setbacks shall b
increased where necessary
000 to obtain the required lot
width at the front building
line.
16-607
[7] Open space or common
area shall be a minimum o
15 feet wide for the entire
length of the rear property
line.
[8] Height limits are subject
Article IV, Division 2.
10/26/16
9
A
In addition to the other requirements of this chapter, the conditions specified in this
section shall be met in an R-15 District.
A. Lot and Building Standards.
A. Lot Standards
1. Lot area and width
a. Area (square feet)
15,000
b. Width (feet)
100
2. Lot coverage maximum %)
30
B.Road Frontage for lots intended for dwelling purposes
feet
1. Family subdivision lot
15
2. Other lots
a. Permanent cul-de-sac
30
b. Radius of a loop street
30
c. Other roads 141
50
C. Principal Building Setbacks (feet) 151
1. Front and
a. Non cul-de-sac
40
b. Permanent cul-de-sac
25
2. Interior side yard
a. Lots recorded after 12/11/1945
15
b. Lots recorded on, or prior to, 12/11/1945
10
3. Corner side yard
a. Lots recorded on, or after, 4/1/1974
1) Through lot, lot back to back with another
corner lot, or lot backing to open space or
common area (71
20
2 Other lot
35
b. Lots recorded prior to 4/1/1974
20
4. Rear yard
a. Non through lot
25
b. Through lot
40
D.Princi al Building Heights maximum
1. Midlothian Core and
Chester Corridor East Special
Design Districts
Lesser of 2.5 stories
or 30 feet
2. Other
Lesser of 3 stories
or 40 feet
E. Accessory Building Requirements
Subject to Section
19.1-304
16-608
Notes for Table 19.1-76.A.
[ 1 ] Lot area requirements
may be impacted by the
availability of public
utilities. Refer to
Chapter 12.
[2] The area of a lot which
shares a common
boundary with a buffer or
bikeway may be reduced
in accordance with Sec.
19.1-306.
[3] For flag lots, road
frontage may be reduced
to 30 feet.
[4] Frontage on the terminus
of a stub street does not
meet the requirements for
road frontage unless
through the preliminary
plat review process it is
determined that extension
of the stub street is not
needed to serve future
development.
[5] Setbacks may be
impacted by Buffer,
Setbacks --Generally,
Permitted Yard
Encroachments for
Principal Buildings,
Floodplain, Chesapeake
Bay or Upper Swift
Creek Watershed
regulations.
[6] Minimum setbacks shall
be increased where
necessary to obtain the
required lot width at the
front building line.
[7] Open space or common
area shall be a minimum
of 15 feet wide for the
entire length of the rear
property line.
[8] Height limits are subject
to Article IV, Division 2.
10/26/16
Sec. 19.1-81. Required Conditions R-12 District.
In addition to the other requirements of this chapter, the conditions specified in this
section shall be met in an R-12 District.
A. Lot and Building Standards.
Table 19.1-81. A. Required Conditioiis R-12 District
A. Lot Standards
1. Lot area and width
a. Area (square feet)
12,000 111121
b. Width (feet)
90
2. Lot coverage (maximum %)
30
B. Road Frontage for lots intended for dwellin
oses feet
1. Family subdivision lot
15
2. Other lots
a. Permanent cul-de-sac
30
b. Radius of a loop street
30
c. Other roads 141
50
C. Principal Building Setbacks feet
1. Front and
a. Non cul-de-sac
35
b. Permanent cul-de-sac
25
2. Interior side yard
10
3. Corner side yard
a. Through lot, lot back to back with another
corner lot, or lot backing to open space or
common area 171
20
b. Other lot
30
4. Rear yard
a. Non through lot
25
b. Through lot
30
D. Principal Building Heights (maximum)
1. Midlothian Core and
Chester Corridor East Special
Design Districts
Lesser of 2.5 stories
or 30 feet
2. Other
Lesser of 3 stories or
40 feet
E. Accessory Building Requirements
Subject to Section
19.1-304
111
16-609
Notes for Table 19.1-81.A.
[ 1 ] Lot area requirements
be impacted by the
availability of public
utilities. Refer to Cha
12.
[2] The area of a lot which
shares a common
boundary with a buffer o:
bikeway may be reduced
in accordance with Sec.
19.1-306.
[3] For flag lots, road fro
may be reduced to 30
[4] Frontage on the terminus
of a stub street does not
meet the requirements fo
road frontage unless
through the preliminary
plat review process it is
determined that extensioi
of the stub street is not
needed to serve future
development.
[5] Setbacks may be impact
by Buffer, Setbacks --
Generally, Permitted Yz
Encroachments for
Principal Buildings,
Floodplain, Chesapeake
Bay or Upper Swift Cre
Watershed regulations.
[6] Minimum setbacks shall
be increased where
necessary to obtain the
required lot width at the
front building line.
10/26/16
E
A
A
Sec. 19.1-86. Required Conditions R -C District.
B. Lot and Building Standards.
I able 19.1-86.13. Required Coilditions R -C District
A. Lot Standards
1. Lot area and width
a. Area (square feet)
111121
12,000
b. Width (feet)
90
2. Lot coverage (maximum %)
30
B.Road Frontage for lots intended for dwelling purposes
31
feet
1. Family Subdivision Lot
15
2. Other Lots
a. Permanent cul-de-sac
30
b. Radius of a loop street
30
c. Other roads 141
50
C. Principal Buildin& Setbacks feet
1. Front yard
a. Non cul-de-sac
35
b. Permanent cul-de-sac
25
2. Interior side yard
10
3. Corner side yard
a. Through lot, lot back to back with another
corner lot, or lot backing to open space or
common area [7]
20
b. Other lot
30
4. Rear yard
a. Non through lot
25
b. Through lot
35
D. Principal Building Height maximum
1. Midlothian Core and
Chester Corridor East Special
Design Districts
Lesser of 2.5 stories
or 30 feet
2. Other
Lesser of 3 stories or
40 feet
E. Accessory Building Requirements
Subject to Section
19.1-304
16-610
for Table 19.1-86.B.
[ 1 ] Lot area requirements
may be impacted by the
availability of public
utilities. Refer to
Chapter 12.
[2] The area of a lot which
shares a common boundary
with a buffer or bikeway
may be reduced in
accordance with Sec. 19.1-
306.
[3] For flag lots, road
frontage shall be reduced
to 30 feet.
[4] Frontage on the terminus
of a stub street does not
meet the requirements for
road frontage unless
through the preliminary
plat review process it is
determined that extension
of the stub street is not
needed to serve future
development.
[5] Setbacks may be
impacted by Buffer,
Setbacks --Generally,
Permitted Yard
Encroachments for
Principal Buildings,
Floodplain, Chesapeake
Bay or Upper Swift
Creek Watershed
regulations.
[6] Minimum setbacks shall
be increased where
necessary to obtain the
required lot width at the
front building line.
[7] Open space or common
area shall be a minimum
of 15 feet wide for the
entire length of the rear
property line.
[8] Height limits are subject
to Article IV, Division 2.
10/26/16
Sec. 19.1-92. Required Conditions R-9 District.
In addition to the other requirements of this chapter, the conditions specified in this
section shall be met in an R-9 District.
A. Lot and Building Standards.
Required Cmditions
A. Lot Standards
1. Lot area and width
a. Area (square feet)
111121
9,000
b. Width (feet)
75
2. Lot coverage (maximum %)
30
B. Road Frontage for lots intended for dwelling purposes (feet) 131
1. Family subdivision lot
15
2. Other lots
a. Permanent cul-de-sac
30
b. Radius of a loop street
30
c. Other roads X41
50
C. Principal Building Setbacks (feet)
1. Front yard
a. Non cul-de-sac
30
b. Permanent cul-de-sac
25
2. Interior side yard
7.5
3. Corner side yard
a. Through lot, lot back to back with another
corner lot, or lot backing to open space or
common area 171
15
b. Other lot
25
4. Rear yard
a. Non through lot
25
b. Through lot
30
D.Princi al Building Heights (maximum)
1. Midlothian Core and
Chester Corridor East Special
Design Districts
Lesser of 2.5 stories
or 30 feet
2. Other
Lesser of 3 stories or
40 feet
E. Accessory Building Requirements
Subject to Section
19.1-304
111
16-611
Notes for Table 19.1-92.A.
[ 1 ] Lot area requirements may
be impacted by the
availability of public
utilities. Refer to Chapter
12.
[2] The area of a lot which
shares a common boundary
with a buffer or bikeway
may be reduced in
accordance with Sec. 19.1-
306.
[3] For flag lots, road frontage
may be reduced to 30 feet.
[4] Frontage on the terminus of
a stub street does not meet
the requirements for road
frontage unless through the
preliminary plat review
process it is determined that
extension of the stub street
is not needed to serve future
development.
[5] Setbacks may be impacted
by Buffer, Setbacks --
Generally, Permitted Yard
Encroachments for Principal
Buildings, Floodplain,
Chesapeake Bay or Upper
Swift Creek Watershed
regulations.
[6] Minimum setbacks shall be
increased where necessary
to obtain the required lot
width at the front building
line.
[7] Open space or common
area shall be a minimum of
15 feet wide for the entire
length of the rear property
line.
[8] Height limits are subject to
Article IV, Division 2.
10/26/16
Ic
A
A
In addition to the other requirements of this chapter, the conditions specified in this
section shall be met in an R-7 District.
A. Lot and Building Standards.
A. Lot Standards
1. Lot area and width for lots recorded prior to 1/1/1989 which received tentative plat approval prior
to 11/13/1985 and such plat has been properly renewed.
a. Area (square feet)
7,000
b. Width (feet)
50
2. Lot area and width for lots where tentative approval is received on or after 11/13/1985
a. Area (square feet)
9,000
b. Width (feet)
75
3. Lot coverage (maximum %)
30
B. Road Frontage for lots intended for dwelling purposes (feet)
1. Family subdivision lot
15
2. Other lots
a. Permanent cul-de-sac
30
b. Radius of a loop street
30
C. Other roads [4]
50
C.Principal Building Setbacks feet
1. Front yard except for Ettrick Special Desi n District
a. Non cul-de-sac
30
b. Permanent cul-de-sac
25
2. Interior side yard
a. Lots recorded after 12/11/1945
7.5
b. Lots recorded on, or prior to, 12/11/1945
5
3. Corner side yard
a. Lots recorded on, or after, 4/1/1974
1) Through lot, lot back to back with another corner lot, or lot 15
backingtoo ens ace or common area [81
2) Other lot
25
b. Lots recorded prior to 4/1/1974
15
4. Rear yard
a. Non through lot
25
b. Through lot
30
D.Princi al Building Heights maximum
1. Midlothian Core and
Chester Corridor East Special Design Districts
Lesser of 2.5 stories or 30 feet
2. Other
Lesser of 3 stories or 40 feet
E. Accessory Building Requirements
Subject to Section 19.1-304
111
16-612
10/26/16
Notes for Table 19.1-97.A.
[ 1 ] Lot area requirements may be impacted by the availability of public utilities. Refer to Chapter12.
[2] The area of a lot which shares a common boundary with a buffer or bikeway may be reduced in
accordance with Sec. 19.1-306.
[3] For flag lots, road frontage may be reduced to 30 feet.
[4] Frontage on the terminus of a stub street does not meet the requirements for road frontage unless
through the preliminary plat review process it is determined that extension of the stub street is not
needed to serve future development.
[5] Setbacks may be impacted by Buffer, Setbacks --Generally, Permitted Yard Encroachments for
Principal Buildings, Floodplain, Chesapeake Bay or Upper Swift Creek Watershed regulations.
[6] For lots located in Ettrick Special Design District:
• Between contiguous developed lots, front yard setback may be reduced to the least front yard
setback of any principal building on any adjacent lot; or
• For other developed lots, front yard setback may be reduced to the front yard setback of any
principal building on the same side of the street and within 200 feet of the lot.
[7] Minimum setbacks shall be increased where necessary to obtain the required lot width at the front
building line.
[8] Open space or common area shall be a minimum of 15 feet wide for the entire length of the rear
property line.
[9] For lots located in Ettrick Special Design District:
• Between contiguous developed lots, through yard setback may be reduced to the least through
yard setback of any principal building on any adjacent lot; or
• For other developed lots, through yard setback may be reduced to the through yard setback of
any principal building on the same side of the street and within 200 feet of the lot.
[10] Height limits are subject to Article IV, Division 2.
16-613
10/26/16
IC
Ic
14
A
A
In addition to the other requirements of this chapter, the conditions specified in this
section shall be met in an A District.
A. Lot and Structure Standards.
Table 19.1-1 33.A. 1. ReqUired Coiiditioiis A District lor lots recorded
A. Lot Standards
oii or after 2 28/2001
1. Excluding family subdivisions, lot area and width for dwelling purposes or manufactured home
a. Area (acres)
5
b. Width (feet)
150
2. Family subdivision lots, lot area and width for dwelling purposes or manufactured home
a. Area (acres) I
I
b. Width (feet) 1
150
3. Lots other than for residential or manufactured home use, lot area and width
a. Area (acres)
I
b. Width (feet)
150
4. Lot coverage (maximum %)
20
B.
Road Frontage for lots intended for dwelling purposes or manufactured home (feet)12,
1. Family subdivision lots
15
2. Other lots
250
C.
Principal Structure Setbacks for lots having road frontage (feet)[']
1. Front yard
150 [41
2. Interior side yard
40
3. Corner side yard
a. Through lot, lot back to back with another corner lot,
or lot backingtoo ens ace or common area 151
40
b. Other lot
75
4. Rear Yard
a. Non through lot
50
b. Through lot
150
D.
Principal Structure Setbacks for which zoning approval has been granted to allow use for dwelling
purposes or a manufactured home without public road frontage (feet)131
1. Front yard
40['1
2. Interior side yard
15
3. Rear yard
25
E.
Principal Structure Heights (maximum) 161
1. Structure Excluding Farm Structure
a. Midlothian Core and Chester Corridor East Special
Design Districts
Lesser of 2.5 stories or 30 feet
b. Other Special Design Districts
Lesser of 3 stories or 40 feet
c. Other Areas
Lesser of 3 stories or 40 feet
2. Farm Structure
a. Midlothian Core and Chester Corridor East Special
Design Districts
Lesser of 2.5 stories or 30 feet
b. Other Special Design Districts excluding Ettrick
Lesser of 3 stories or 40 feet
c. Other Areas
50 feet
F.
Accessory Structure Requirements
Subject to Section 19.1-304
Notes for Table 19.1-133.A.1.
[1] The lot width shall be increased to the minimum required road frontage width for a depth necessary
to create a 5 acre lot or in an arrangement approved by the director of planning based upon
limitations imposed by the lot shape or environmental features.
[2] Frontage on the terminus of a stub street does not meet the requirements for road frontage unless a
determination is made that extension of the stub street is not needed to serve future development.
[3] Setbacks may be impacted by Floodplain, Chesapeake Bay or Upper Swift Creek Watershed
regulations.
[4] Minimum setbacks shall be increased where necessary to obtain the required width at the front
building line.
[5] Open space or common area shall be a minimum of 15 feet wide for the entire length of the rear
property line.
[6] Height limits are subject to Article IV, Division 2.
16-614
10/26/16
Table
prior
A.
19.1-133.A.2. Required Conditions A District for
to 1
Lot Standards
lots recorded oti or afier 5/261988 an(l
1. Lot area and width
a. Area (acres)
I
b. Width (feet)
150
2. Lot coverage (maximum %)
20
B.
Road Frontage for lots intended for dwelling purposes or manufactured home (feet)["
1. Family subdivision lots
15
2. Other lots
50
C.
Principal Structure Setbacks for lots having road frontage (feet)[21
1. Front yard
150 [3] [41
2. Interior side yard
40
3. Corner side yard
a. Through lot, lot back to back with another corner lot, or lot
backingtoo ens ace or common area [51
40
b. Other lot
75
4. Rear Yard
a. Non through lot
50
b. Through lot
150[31
D.
Principal Structure Setbacks for which zoning approval has been granted to allow use for
dwelling purposes or a manufactured home without public road frontage (feet) [21
1. Front yard
40 [4]
2. Interior side yard
15
3. Rear yard
25
E.
Principal Structure Heights (maximum)[61
1. Structure Excluding Farm Structure
a. Midlothian Core and Chester Corridor East
Special Design Districts
Lesser of 2.5 stories or 30 feet
b. Other Special Design Districts
Lesser of 3 stories or 40 feet
C. Other Areas
Lesser of 3 stories or 40 feet
2. Farm Structure
a. Midlothian Core and Chester Corridor East
Special Design Districts
Lesser of 2.5 stories or 30 feet
b. Other Special Design Districts excluding
Ettrick
Lesser of 3 stories or 40 feet
C. Other Areas
50 feet
F. Accessory Structure Requirements
Subject to Section 19.1-304
Notes for Table 19.1-133.A.2.
[1] Frontage on the terminus of a stub street does not meet the requirements for road frontage unless a
determination is made that extension of the stub street is not needed to serve future development.
[2] Setbacks may be impacted by Floodplain, Chesapeake Bay or Upper Swift Creek Watershed
regulations.
[3] For a lot created prior to 6/23/1993 which has a principal building constructed prior to 6/23/1993
with a setback less than 150 feet, the building may be expanded, if the addition is set back at least
the same distance as the existing building, but not less than 40 feet.
[4] Minimum setbacks shall be increased, where necessary, to obtain the required width at the front
building line.
[5] Open space or common area shall be a minimum of 15 feet wide for the entire length of the rear
property line.
[6] Height limits are subject to Article IV, Division 2.
16-615
10/26/16
P]
P]
A
CEJ
Table 19.1-133.A.3. Required Conditions A District for lots recorded prior to 5/26!1988
A. Lot Standards
1. Lot area and width
a. Area (square feet)
15,000111
b. Width (feet)
100
2. Lot coverage (maximum %)
30
B.
Road Frontage for lots intended for dwelling purposes or manufactured home (feet)
1. Family subdivision lots
15
2. Other lots
50
C.
Principal Structure Setbacks for lots having road frontage (feet) 14
1. Front yard
100 151161
2. Interior side yard
a. Lot recorded on, or after, 12/11/1945
15
b. Lot recorded prior to 12/11/1945
10
3. Corner side yard
a. Lot recorded on or after 4/1/1974 that is a Through lot,
lot back to back with another corner lot, or lot backing
too ens ace or common area [71
20
b. Lot recorded on or after 4/1/1974, other lot
35
c. Lot recorded prior to 4/1/1974
20
4. Rear Yard
a. Non through lot
25
b. Through lot
100151
D.
Principal Structure Setbacks for which zoning approval has been granted to allow use for
dwelling purposes or a manufactured home without public road frontage (feet)141
1. Front yard
40161
2. Interior side yard
15
3. Rear yard
25
E.
Principal Structure Heights (maximum) 181
1. Structure Excluding Farm Structure
a. Midlothian Core and Chester Corridor
East Special Design Districts
Lesser of 2.5 stories or 30 feet
b. Other Special Design Districts
Lesser of 3 stories or 40 feet
c. Other Areas
Lesser of 3 stories or 40 feet
2. Farm Structure
a. Midlothian Core and Chester Corridor
East Special Design Districts
Lesser of 2.5 stories or 30 feet
b. Other Special Design Districts excluding
Ettrick
Lesser of 3 stories or 40 feet
c. Other Areas
50 feet
F.
Accessory Structure Requirements
Subject to Section 19.1-304
16-616
10/26/16
Notes for Table 19.1-133.A.3.
[1] Lot area requirements may be impacted by the availability of public utilities. Refer to Chapter 12.
[2] Frontage on the terminus of a stub street does not meet the requirements for road frontage unless a
determination is made that extension of the stub street is not needed to serve future development.
[3] Lots recorded without road frontage prior to 4/28/1976 are not subject to road frontage
requirements. Such lots may be used for dwelling purposes or manufactured home purposes with
zoning approval.
[4] Setbacks may be impacted by Floodplain, Chesapeake Bay or Upper Swift Creek Watershed
regulations.
[5] For a lot created prior to 5/26/1988 which has a principal building constructed prior to 5/26/1988
with a setback less than 100 feet, the building may be expanded, if the addition is set back at least
the same distance as the existing building, but not less than 40 feet.
[6] Minimum setbacks shall be increased where necessary to obtain the required width at the front
building line.
[7] Open space or common area shall be a minimum of 15 feet wide for the entire length of the rear
property line.
[8] Height limits are subject to Article IV, Division 2.
For a development that requires site plan or lot subdivision plat approval, bikeways
shall be provided in accordance with the Bikeways and Trails Plan of the
comprehensive plan and constructed generally as outlined in the Bikeways and
Trails Plan Facility Guidance Section of the Bikeways and Trails Chapter of the
comprehensive plan unless the director of planning determines that construction of
the facility is not feasible due to:
• topography;
• environmental constraints;
• alternative locations or designs accomplish intent of the comprehensive
plan
• adverse impact on subject, or adjacent, development; or
• cost to maintain bikeway.
The exact facility type, width, design and location shall be reviewed and approved by the
planning department at the time of plan review. Bikeways shall either be located in right-
of-way, on county -owned property or within a county easement. Unless otherwise approved
by the transportation department, right-of-way to accommodate bikeways shall be exclusive
of the right-of-way required by Sec. 19.1-209.13. If within a county easement on R, R-TH
or MH -2 property, such easement shall be located in common area, unless otherwise
approved by the planning department. Prior to the recordation of any subdivision lot which
abuts a right-of-way, easement, buffer or common area in which a bikeway is to be located,
such bikeway shall be substantially completed, as determined by the planning department.
16-617
10/26/16
9
P]
IC
A
M
B. Measurement from Roads. Except as provided in 2.
below, setbacks from roads shall be measured from the
ultimate right-of-way unless the existing right-of-way is
wider. The ultimate right-of-way shall be the greater of
that shown on the thoroughfare plan of the
comprehensive plan, set of construction plans approved
by the director of transportation or as may be
determined by the director of transportation. Unless
otherwise determined by the director of transportation,
it shall be assumed that the road will be widened
equally on both sides of the established centerline to the
full designated right-of-way width.
F.
In R -MF, MH -1, MH -3, O, C and I Districts, and on
property occupied by non-residential uses in any
district, when the ultimate right-of-way is expanded
solely to accommodate a bikeway required by Sec.
19.1-208., setbacks shall be measured without including
the expanded right-of-way, except that the setback shall
not be less than 1 foot from the expanded right-of-way.
Landscaping shall be proportionately reduced by the
area occupied by the bikeway.
Notes for Table 19.1.210.A.
[ 1 ] Encroachment shall be no
closer than 5 feet to an
interior side lot line or 10
feet to a front or comer
side lot line.
[2] Side of structure is
considered open if a
maximum of 2 feet of the
height of the side is
constructed of brick,
siding, lattice, louvers or
other building materials.
Any portion of the
structure which complies
with the required
minimum principal
structure yard setback is
not required to be open.
[3] Encroachment shall be no
closer than 5 feet to
interior side lot line.
Lot Subdivision Principal Building Setbacks from
Buffers and Bikeways. Principal building setbacks from a buffer required by Sec.
19.1-263.B. which encroaches into or abuts a lot shall be the lesser of the required
yard setback or 25 feet. On a lot adjacent to property occupied by a bikeway
required by Sec. 19.1-208, a principal building shall be set back the lesser of the
required yard setback or 25 feet.
Table 19.1-210.A. Permitted Yard Encroachment for Principal
Buildings
Front Interior Rear Corner
Side Side
Cornice, eave, sill, leader,
belt course, chimney, 3111
3111
3
3111
canopy or similar
ornamental feature
Uncovered stairs or fire
4.5111
4.5111
4.5
4.5111
escape
Terrace, step, or
landings not higher than
10111
10111
10
10111
the entrance floor of the
building
Bay window or balcony
occupying not more than
3111
3111
3
3111
one-third of the wall
length
Outside storm enclosure
not more than 6 feet in
4111
4111
4
4111
width
V2 required
Attachments open on 3
side yard
sides such as porch,
10
for
10
0
carport, drive-in window
principal
or gasoline canopy 121
structure 131
16-618
Parts of principal buildings
may project into required
minimum yards as shown in
Table 19.1-210.A.:
10/26/16
Roff
Sec. 19.1-213. through 19.1-219. Reserved.
G. Arterials and Collectors.
3. Access Plan. An access plan shall be drawn to scale and include the following,
as deemed necessary by the director of transportation:
o dimensions and distances;
o traffic and pedestrian circulation system;
o location and width of roads, crossovers, driveways, access aisles,
entrances to parking areas, pedestrian ways, bikeways; and
0 other information as may be required.
16-619
10/26/16
It
IC
9
A
A
A
ISec. 19.1-236. Required Parking Spaces per Use.
111
Table 19.1-236.A. ReqUired Number ol'Parkino Spaces
by (Jse
Number of Spaces Required
Specific Use
All Areas Excluding ' '
General Use Category or
. Di
sign istricts
De'
Special De Districts
121131 141,
Size of Use
ial �
t.
Dwelling units except as
2 per dwelling unit
2 per dwelling unit
listed below
Assisted living with
dwelling units (for Assisted
living without dwelling
0.8 per dwelling unit
0.8 per dwelling unit
units see Health Care,
Assisted living)
2 per manufactured
2 per manufactured
Manufactured home
home [6]
home [61
Multiple -family -
Residential Units 151
Occupancy restricted to
"housing for older persons"
as defined by the Virginia
1.2 per dwelling unit
1.2 per dwelling unit
Fair Housing Law with no
residents permitted under
19 years of age
2 per dwelling unit, plus
2 per dwelling unit, plus
I for each 5 dwelling
I for each 5 dwelling
Townhouses
units to be located in
units to be located in
common parking areas
common parking areas
As per Sec. 19.1-235.A.
As per Sec. 19.1-235.A.
I per each 20 persons
enrolled up to a
Adult
maximum of 6 spaces,
plus one for each
employee[7)
4.4 per 1000 s/f of gfa 171
I per each 20 persons
enrolled up to a
Child
maximum of 6 spaces,
plus one for each
employee171
Family day care home
As per Sec. 19.1-235.A.
Asper Sec. 19.1-235.A.
Art, dance, martial arts,
I per 200 s/f of gfa
I per 200 s/f of gfa
music
I per employee, plus I
I per employee, plus I
for each 6 students
for each 6 students
Business or vocational
enrolled (maximum
enrolled (maximum
students on site at one
students on site at one
time)
time)
Grades pre -kindergarten
5 plus I per employee
5 plus I per employee
(maximum on site at
(maximum on site at
tough grade 9
throughone
time)
one time)
I per employee plus I
per employee plus I
I
Grades 10 and higher
for each 6 students
for each 6 students
enrolled (maximum on
enrolled (maximum on
site at one time)
site at one time)
16-620
10/26/16
see Dwelling, assisted
Health Care living with dwelling units)
Clinic: Medical, Dental, As required for Office As required for Office
Optical uses uses
Hospital 1.5 for each bed 1.5 for each bed
Nursing Home 1 for each 4 beds 1 for each ,+ beds
Ambulance
or
Rescue Sauad
16-621
3 for each emergency 3 for each emergency
service vehicle operated service vehicle operate
from site from site
10/26/16
PI
PI
Specific Use
Number of Spaces Required
1 per 100 s/f of gfa of
Areas Eaccludaag
Special -
Sow
Des
---------------------------------------------------
General Use Category
or
Size of Use
1 for each 4 seats of
1 for each 4 seats of
--Hotel-or motel
------------------------------------------------
1 per bedroom
- ----------------------------------------
1 per bedroom
main meeting area
• With cocktail lounge,
Add 1 per 150 s/f of gfa
-----------------------------------------
Add 1 per 150s/f of gf
-
Lodging
_restaurant or nightclub
for such area
------
for such area
1 per 500 s/f of gfa-
• With meeting facility
Add 1 per each 3 seats
---
Add 1 per each 3 seats
5 spaces minimum
Veterinary clinic or hospital
of capacity for such area
of capacity for such are
Arena or stadium
1 for each 4 seats
1 for each 4 seats
uses
Church or other place of
1 for each 4 seats of
1 for each 4 seats
worship
sanctuary or main
sanctuary or main
worshi room ca acity
worshi room ca acity
1 for each 4 beds
Club or lodge------------------------
• Without fixed seats
1 per 100 s/f of gfa of
1 per 100 s/f of gfa of
--------------------------------------------------
-assembly area
_-------------------
assembly
- area-------------
1 for each 4 seats of
1 for each 4 seats of
• With fixed seats
main meeting area
main meeting area
Place of Assembly
capacity
capacity
Theater, sit down
1 for each 3 seats of
I for each 3 seats of
capacity
ca aci
Place of assembly not
otherwise enumerated
see Dwelling, assisted
Health Care living with dwelling units)
Clinic: Medical, Dental, As required for Office As required for Office
Optical uses uses
Hospital 1.5 for each bed 1.5 for each bed
Nursing Home 1 for each 4 beds 1 for each ,+ beds
Ambulance
or
Rescue Sauad
16-621
3 for each emergency 3 for each emergency
service vehicle operated service vehicle operate
from site from site
10/26/16
PI
PI
• Without fixed seats
1 per 100 s/f of gfa
1 per 100 s/f of gfa of
---------------------------------------------------
-assembly area
assembly area
1 for each 4 seats of
1 for each 4 seats of
• With fixed seats
main meeting area
main meeting area
capacity
ca acity
Kennel, commercial
1 per 500 s/f of gfa-
1 per 500 s/f of gfa-
Animal Care
5 spaces minimum
5 spaces minimum
Veterinary clinic or hospital
As required for Office
As required for Office
uses
uses
Assisted living without
dwelling units (for assisted
living with dwelling units
1 for each 4 beds
1 for each 4 beds
see Dwelling, assisted
Health Care living with dwelling units)
Clinic: Medical, Dental, As required for Office As required for Office
Optical uses uses
Hospital 1.5 for each bed 1.5 for each bed
Nursing Home 1 for each 4 beds 1 for each ,+ beds
Ambulance
or
Rescue Sauad
16-621
3 for each emergency 3 for each emergency
service vehicle operated service vehicle operate
from site from site
10/26/16
PI
PI
Specific Use
General Use Category or
Size of Use
10,000 s/f or less of gfa
10,001 to 26,500 s/f of gfa
75,001 s/f or more of gfa
D
it rental
;rvice and service
Number of
All Areas Excluding
1 per 200 s/f of gfa-
5 spaces minimum
1 per 200 s/f for the
first 10,000 s/f of gfa,
plus 1 per 250 s/f in
excess of 10,000 s/f of
1 per 200 s/f for the
first 10,000 s/f of gfa,
plus 1 per 250 s/f in
excess of 10,000 s/f of
1 per 200 s/f for the first
10,000 s/f of gfa, plus 1
per 250 s/f for the next
40,000 s/f of gfa, plus 1
per each additional 300
s/f in excess of 50,000
s/f of gfa
1 per 200 s/f for the
first 10,000 s/f of gfa,
plus 1 per 250 s/f for
the next 40,000 s/f of
gfa, plus 1 per each
additional 300 s/f for
the next 25,000 s/f of
gfa, plus 1 per each
additional 400 s/f in
excess of 75,000 s/f of
3 plus 3 for each
service bav
1 per 400 s/f of gfa of
enclosed sales, rental,
office and parts area
excluding service areas,
plus 1 for each 2500 s/f
of outside display area,
plus 3 for each service
1 per 200 s/f of gfa of
enclosed building
excluding service areas,
plus 3 for each service
16-622
Special Design Districts
Cz1 pT [+1
4.4 per 1000 s/f of gfaI81
4.4 per 1000 s/f of gfa'81
1 per 200 s/f for the
first 10,000 s/f of gfa,
plus 1 per 250 s/f in
excess of 10,000 s/f of
1 per 200 s/f for the first
10,000 s/f of gfa, plus 1
per 250 s/f for the next
40,000 s/f of gfa, plus 1
per each additional 300
s/f in excess of 50,000
s/f of gfal8I
1 per 200 s/f for the
first 10,000 s/f of gfa,
plus 1 per 250 s/f for
the next 40,000 s/f of
gfa, plus 1 per each
additional 300 s/f for
the next 25,000 s/f of
gfa, plus 1 per each
additional 400 s/f in
excess of 75,000 s/f of
3 plus 3 for each
service bav
1 per 400 s/f of gfa of
enclosed sales, rental,
office and parts area
excluding service areas,
plus 1 for each 2500 s/f
of outside display area,
plus 3 for each service
4.4 per 1000 s/f of gfa
enclosed building
excluding service areas,
plus 3 for each service
10/26/16
Specific Use
General Use Category or
Size of Use
uuUppxng %'Unwr
or
Similar Group of
Retail Bniidinac
Number of Spaces Required
All Axis uctg '
SpcciaT }D` 41
of lzl��'t�l
4.4 per 1000 s/f of gfa 14.4 per 1000 s/f of gfa181
16-623
10/26/16
Ic
It
W
Appliance store
1 per 750 s/f of gfa
4.4 per 1000 s/f of gfa
1 per 400 s/f of
1 per 400 s/f of
Building materials sales
enclosed gfa area, plus
1 per 2000 s/f of outside
enclosed gfa area, plus
1 per 2000 s/f of
display area
outside display area
Furniture store
1 per 750 s/f of gfa
4.4 per 1000 s/f of gfa
1 per 200 s/f of gfa in
4.4 per 1000 s/f of gfa
enclosed building
in enclosed building
exclusive of
exclusive of
Retail700
Greenhouse or plant
nursery
greenhouse, plus 1 per
s/f of gfa in
greenhouse, plus 1 per
greenhouse, plus 1 per
700 s/f of gfa in
greenhouse, plus 1 per
700 s/f of outside
700 s/f of outside
display and growing
display and growing
area
area
1 per 400 s/f of
1 per 400 s/f of
Home Center
enclosed gfa area, plus
1 per 2000 s/f of
enclosed gfa area, plus
1 per 2000 s/f of
outside display area
outside display area
Retail Uses Not Otherwise
Enumerated
1 per 200 s/f of gfa
4.4 per 1000s/f of gfaf8l
Vendor, outdoor
5 for each vendor
5 for each vendor
Personal Service
1 per 200 s/f of gfa
4.4 per 1000 s/f of gfa 181
Carry -out
2 per 100 s/f of gfa
Restaurant
Fast food or drive-in
2 per 100 s/f of gfa-
15 space minimum
4.4 per 1000 s/f of gfa181
Sit down
1.5 per 100 s/f of sfa
16-623
10/26/16
Ic
It
W
General Use Category
Office space less than 50%
of the gfa and retail uses
Number of Spaces
Required
.
11114101 C4l
Special Design
Districts
121�t3114)
Specific Use
or.
Size of Use
1 for each employee
I for each employee
(maximum on site at any
(maximum on site at any
one time), plus 1 per 200
one time), plus 1 per 200
s/f of gfa of front
s/f of gfa of front
counter sales and stock
counter sales and stock
area, plus 1 for each
area, plus 1 for each
company vehicle
company vehicle
1 for each employee
1 for each employee
(maximum on site at
(maximum on site at
any one time, plus 1
any one time), plus 1
per 200 s/f of gfa of
per 200 s/f of gfa of
front counter sales and
front counter sales and
stock area, plus 1 for
stock area, plus 1 for
each company vehicle
each company vehicle
Office space less than 50%
of the gfa and retail uses
1 per 400 s/f of gfa
1 per 400 s/f of gfa
are accessory
Office space less than 50%
of the gfa and there are no
1 per 750 s/f of gfa
1 per 750 s/f of gfa
retail uses
Office space more than
50% of the gfa and retail
1 per 300 s/f of gfa
1 per 300 s/f of gfa
uses are accessory
Office space more than
50% of the gfa and there
1 per 400 s/f of gfa
1 per 400 s/f of gfa
are no retail uses
1 for each employee
1 for each employee
(maximum on site at any
(maximum on site at
one time)-
any one time) -
5 space minimum
5 space minimum
1 per 300 s/f of gfa
1 for each employee for
the first 300
employees, plus 1 per
each 2 employees in
excess of 300
(maximum on site at
anv one time)
16-624
1 per 300 s/f of gfa
1 for each employee for
the first 300
employees, plus 1 per
each 2 employees in
excess of 300
(maximum on site at
any one time)
10/26/16
Table 19.1-236.A. Required
NUmber of Parking Spaces
by LJse
Number of Spaces. Required
General Use Category
Specific Use
orSial
Size of Use
DiesigttSpecial,
f73stricts ,
Ii1 tz1131 tal
1 for each 3 karts,
1 for each 3 karts,
Go-kart, bumper boats or
similar use
boats or similar use
accommodated on
track, water or similar
boats or similar use
accommodated on
track, water or similar
facility at any one time
facility at any one time
Golf course
60 per each 9 holes
60 per each 9 holes
Golf driving range
1.2 per each tee
1.2 per each tee
3 for each hole for the
3 for each hole for the
first 18 holes, plus 2
first 18 holes, plus 2
Golf course, miniature
for each hole for the
second 18 holes, plus 1
for each hole for the
second 18 holes, plus 1
for each hole in excess
for each hole in excess
of 36
of 36
Sports playfields, indoor
and outdoor with fixed
1 for each 4 seats
1 for each 4 seats
Recreational
seats .
Sports playfields, indoor
without fixed seats
45 per field
45 per field
Sports playfields, outdoor
without fixed seats
30 per field
30 per field
1 per 90 s/f of
1 per 90 s/f of
Swimming pool
swimming and wading
swimming and wading
area
area
Tennis, racquetball,
squash and handball court
4 per court
4 per court
Volleyball court
12 per court
12 per court
Indoor facilities not
otherwise listed
1 per 200 s/f of gfa
4.4per 1000s/f of
fad
Notes for Table 19.1-236.A.
[1] In the Northern Jefferson Davis Highway Corridor, parking requirements shall be based upon the lesser
of that outlined in the Table or 4.4 per 1000 s/f of gfa.
[2] In the Northern Jefferson Davis Highway Corridor, Employment Center, Special Design Districts and
C-1 Districts, the required number of parking spaces may be reduced by 10% if the development
contains a sidewalk or other pedestrian system which connects, or will connect, to existing or future
sidewalks or pedestrian systems.
[3] In the Northern Jefferson Davis Highway Corridor and Special Design Districts, parking spaces in a
road may be counted toward the required number of parking spaces when more than 1/2 of the space
adjoins the use.
[4] Within a non-residential development adjacent to a bikeway required by Sec. 19.1-208., the number of
parking spaces may be reduced by 1 for each 6 bicycle storage spaces, with a maximum reduction of 3
and provided a minimum of 5 parking spaces shall be provided.
[5] For residential uses, parking spaces within a garage or an enclosed or covered space may be counted
toward parking requirements.
[6] In an MH -1 District, one of the required parking spaces may be located in a common parking area
within the park.
[7] If a drop-off or pick-up area is provided directly from vehicles to the building, stacking space shall be
provided. If such an area is not provided, 5 additional parking spaces shall be installed. If care is
provided for school age children, a sidewalk shall be installed from the building to the school bus stop
for the facility.
[8] In the Ettrick Special Design District, parking requirements for the use shall be based upon 2.2 parking
spaces per 1,000 s/f of gfa.
16-625
10/26/16
P7
lk
Where the required number of parking spaces is reduced as provided in Table 19.1-
236.A., Note 4, the following standards shall be met:
1. Storage spaces which shall include bicycle racks shall be of a shape, location
and design so as to be effectively usable;
2. Storage spaces shall be located as close as practicable to building entrances; and
3. Storage spaces shall either be located within:
• a parking area, but not on required parking spaces or so as to obstruct
vehicular traffic;
• a sidewalk, but not so as to obstruct pedestrian traffic; or
• another area as may be approved through plan review.
B. Permitted Uses in Buffers. Provided that the uses are consistent with the
purpose and intent of buffers, uses permitted in buffers include:
o landscaping and screening as permitted herein;
o signs;
o security fencing;
o utilities which run generally perpendicular through the buffer;
o pedestrian ways;
o bikeways; or
o similar uses as may be permitted through plan review.
In subdivisions, easements or road accesses crossing a buffer shall be permitted
provided they cross the buffer generally at right angles or so as to have the least
impact on the buffer.
D. Permitted Encroachments into Buffers Adiacent to Roads in Subdivisions. The
following encroachments shall be permitted, provided that, at the time of plan
review for a subdivision, the necessity for the encroachment is demonstrated along
with the fact that alternatives to the encroachment are not easily available. The
easement encroachment shall be depicted on construction plans.
2. At time of preliminary plat review, if it is determined, due to unique site
circumstance, that a BMP is required adjacent to a road, the BMP may encroach
as determined by the director of environmental engineering, provided that:
• in addition to the requirements of Section 19.1-212., landscaping, berms,
or decorative fences or features are provided between the lots and the
16-626
10/26/16
road to accomplish the spirit and intent of the buffer requirement and to
preclude access to the road, as determined at the time of plan review.
A. Buffers between Different Zoning Districts.
000
3. Buffers Treatment. Table 19.1-263.A.2.a. outlines the landscaping
requirements for buffers between different zoning districts. If the buffer does not
contain existing vegetation or if existing vegetation is approved for removal, the
requirements of either Table 19.1-263.A.2.a. or Table 19.1-263.A.2.b. may be
used.
Table 19.1-263).A.2.a.
Vegetation
Exists
Buffer Treatment
be Retained
Between
Different
Zoning Districts
where
and
will
TREATMENT
Deciduous/
Large
BUFFER
Small
AndCrround
(Feet)
Loty Sbr
Deciduous/
WIDTH
Deciduous/
;'fie
Evergreen
a round77,
va#; ,
Feet
(Feet)
Linear Feet
Deciduous/
Tree/Linear
Sturub/l ear
[2)
Linear Feet
Feet
Les5t an
-
beds
1/50
Less than
50
1/30
1/50
1/30
1/10
Yes
C
50
1.5/30
1.5/50
1.5/30
1.5/10
Yes
1.5 x C
75
2/30
2/50
2/30
2/10
Yes
2 x C
100
2.5/30
2.5/50
2.5/30
2.5/10
Yes
2.5 x C
Notes for Table 19.1-263.A.2.a.
[1] Between different zoning districts, where a bikeway required by Sec. 19.1-208. is permitted
within a buffer, the director of planning may modify buffer treatment requirements so long as
the resulting improvements and design meet the purpose and intent of buffers.
[2] Evergreen trees may be substituted for a maximum of 50 percent of required small deciduous
trees.
19.1-26').A.2.b. Buffer Treatment Between Different Zoning Districts Where
ApprovedTable
Vegetation Does Not Exist or is
TREATMENT
BUFFER
Small
Low shrub*
WIDTH
Deciduous/
Large
Evergreen
Medium
AndCrround
(Feet)
Linear Feet
Deciduous/
Tree/Liam
Sinub/L near
Cover I in, Tree '
Berm
[2)
Linear Feet
Feet
beef
and S#a�ttb
$eds
Les5t an
1/50
1/50
1/30
1/15
Yes
4' High with
50
1.5/50
1.5/50
1.5/30
1.5/15
Yes
maximum
75
2/50
2/50
2/30
2/15
Yes
side slope of
100
2.5/50
2.5/50
2.5/30
2.5/15
Yes
3:1
Notes for Table 19.1-263.A.2.b.
[1] Between different zoning districts, where a bikeway required by Sec. 19.1-208. is permitted
within a buffer, the director of planning may modify buffer treatment requirements so long as
the resulting improvements and design meet the purpose and intent of buffers.
[2] Evergreen trees may be substituted for a maximum of 50 percent of required small deciduous
trees.
16-627
10/26/16
A
A
B. Buffers Adiacent to Roads in Lot Subdivisions.
Buffer Widths. For a lot subdivision, as defined in Chapter 17, buffers shall be
provided adjacent to roads as outlined in Table 19.1-263.13.1.
Notes for Table 19.1-263.B.1.
[1] Buffer requirements shall not apply to lots recorded prior to 2/28/2001.
[2] Where right-of-way dedication occurs to accommodate a bikeway required in 19.1-208., the
width of the buffer shall be reduced by the width of the right-of-way necessary to accommodate
the bikeway.
[3] In the Upper Swift Creek Special Buffer Area shown on the zoning maps, the buffer width shall
be increased to 100 feet except for lots which received preliminary plat approval prior to
10/10/2007.
B. Subdivision Review. Except for buffers required by zoning approval and when
such approval did not allow modification of the requirements through plan review,
the requirements for buffers in subdivisions may be modified during subdivision
plan review provided that the resulting improvements and design meet the purpose
and intent of buffers and, for buffers adjacent to roads, preclude access to the road.
Where the buffer width is reduced to accommodate a bikeway required by 19.1-
208, the required treatment within the buffer shall be likewise reduced or
alternative treatment may be approved within the reduced width.
For buffers adjacent to roads, modifications shall be limited to relocation of the
buffer area and plantings, or alternative landscaping, as follows:
• reduction of the shrub requirement if it is determined that another
feature, such as topography or existing mature vegetation, would limit
the effectiveness of, or necessity for, shrubs;
• using durable decorative walls or fences, berms, increasing landscaping,
fencing to minimize land disturbance, or subdivision design; or
• significant or unique topographical variation which accomplishes the
spirit and intent of the buffer, and precludes access to the road.
111
Sec. 19.1-274. Sign Setbacks and Lighting.
A. Signs Permitted in VDOT Right -of -Way. In addition to the signs outlined in B.,
the following signs may be placed within the right-of-way if approved by the
Virginia Department of Transportation:
signs posted by, on behalf of, or with permission of, a governmental
agency or public utility;
16-628
10/26/16
• noncommercial signs within a median strip at the entrances to
residential, nonresidential, or mixed use communities; and
• limited duration banners across a road in Special Design Districts related
to a noncommercial activity within the District; and
• other signs permitted by this chapter when located within a right-of-way
expanded solely to accommodate a bikeway required by Sec. 19.1-208.
B. Road Setbacks. Except where expressly stated, signs shall meet the following
requirements:
1. Road Setbacks. Except as outlined herein, setbacks shall be measured from the
existing right-of-way. If a sign is permitted to be located within an ultimate
right-of-way shown on the comprehensive plan, or an existing right-of-way, the
owner shall be responsible for relocating the sign to conform to the setback
requirements at such time that the road is widened. Signs shall conform to the
following setbacks:
a. Except as outlined b., signs shall be set back as follows:
• in Special Design Districts, 5 feet from the right-of-way; or
• in other areas, 20 feet from the edge of the pavement or face of curb as
applicable, but in no case less than 1 foot from the right-of-way.
b. Along the following roads, signs may be located within the ultimate right-of-
way shown on the comprehensive plan if the right-of-way is dedicated, free
and unrestricted, to the county, and either a license agreement is obtained
from the board of supervisors or a permit is obtained from VDOT, as may be
applicable, provided the signs are set back 20 feet from the edge of the
pavement or face of the curb, as applicable:
o Route 60 between the Powhatan County line and Winterfield Road;
o Route 60 between Old Buckingham Road and the Richmond corporate
limits;
o Route 360;
o Route 10 between the Richmond corporate limits and Buckingham
Street;
o Route 10 between Jefferson Davis Highway and the Hopewell corporate
limits;
o Huguenot Road;
o Courthouse Road between Route 60 and Route 360;
o Harrowgate Road; and
o Jefferson Davis Highway.
A. R, MH -2 and MH -3 Districts.
[IIID
16-629
10/26/16
It
P]
A
Notes for Table 19.1-304.A.3.a.
[1] Eaves may encroach 3 feet into required setback.
[2] Setbacks from a buffer required by Sec. 19.1-263.13. which encroach into or abuts a lot shall
be 5 feet.
[3] Setbacks in MH -3 Districts are for individual pad sites.
Notes for Table 19.1-304.A.3.b.
[1] Eaves may encroach 3 feet into required setback.
[2] Setbacks from a buffer required by Sec. 19.1-263.13. which encroach into or abuts a lot shall
be 5 feet.
[3] Setbacks in MH -3 districts are for individual pad sites.
Notes for Table 19.1-304.A.3.c.
[ 1 ] Eaves may encroach 3 feet into required setback.
[2] Setbacks from a buffer required by Sec. 19.1-263.13. which encroach into or abuts a lot shall
be 5 feet.
[3] Setbacks in MH -3 districts are for individual pad sites.
B. R-TH Districts
Notes for Table 19.1-304.B.3.
[1] Eaves may encroach 3 feet into required setback.
[2] Windows, doors or other similar openings shall not be permitted above the lesser of 1 story or 10 feet
[3] A privacy yard having a minimum size of 10 by 25 feet shall be maintained.
[4] To ensure adequate usable open space on each lot, 1 wall of the accessory building shall abut an interior side
property line and maintain a solid wall without windows, doors or other similar openings adjoining the
interior side property line.
[5] Detached accessory building 12 feet or more in height shall meet a setback of 10 feet.
[6] Setbacks from a buffer required by Sec. 19.1-263.13. which encroach into or abuts a lot shall be 5 feet.
[7] Detached accessory building 12 feet or more in height shall meet a setback of 12.5 feet.
In R Districts, the required lot area may be reduced by 20 percent when the lot
shares a common boundary with one of the following:
a bikeway required by Sec. 19.1-208. constructed in conjunction with the
development of the affected lot, and right-of-way in excess of the
ultimate right-of-way is dedicated free and unrestricted, to and for
Chesterfield County, to accommodate the facility;
a bikeway required by Sec. 19.1-208. constructed in conjunction with
the development of the affected lot, and land is dedicated fee simple, to
and for Chesterfield County, to accommodate the facility; or
• a buffer required by Sec. 19.1-263.13.1 and the buffer is located in
common area.
16-630
10/26/16
The length of the common boundary shall be at least the minimum lot width
required for the district. Lot lines shall not be arbitrarily manipulated, as
determined by the planning department, to obtain the required minimum lot width
at the common boundary. In an R-88 District, the minimum lot area for the district
shall be based upon requirements of Table 19.1-61.A. Note 1.
6Sec. 19.1-307. through 19.1-314. Reserved.
111
Sec. 19.1-369. Required Conditions Ettrick Special Design District.
Notes for Table 19.1-369.A.
[1] Setbacks may be impacted by Setbacks -Generally, Permitted Yard Encroachments for Principal
Buildings, Floodplain and Chesapeake Bay regulations.
[2] At least one principal building in a project shall be set back as follows:
• 75% or more of the fagade shall have a maximum setback of 15 feet; or
• if a hardscaped pedestrian area extending from that portion of the building set back greater than
15 feet to the required 8 foot setback line is provided, less than 75% of the fagade, but in no case
less than 50% of the fagade, shall have a maximum setback of 15 feet.
[3] Canopies and awnings that create pedestrian arcades shall be permitted to encroach into the required
setback and shall not be subject to the limits of Section 19.1-210.
[4] Parking shall be set back as follows:
• no closer to the road than the rear of the building; or
• if there is no building, the greater of either '/2 the depth of the lot or no closer to the road than the
rear fagade setback of the nearest building facing the road.
Views of parking from roads shall either be minimized by a building, or 3 to 4 foot high decorative
walls, fencing, evergreen hedges or a combination thereof. Hedges shall be maintained at a height of
3 to 4 feet. Walls, fencing and hedges shall be located as follows:
• set back from the road at the minimum building setback; or
• between the parking and any hardscaped pedestrian area located between the road and the parking
area.
[5] Parking shall not be located between the fagade of any building and the road.
Views of parking areas from roads shall either be minimized by a building, or 3 to 4 foot high
decorative walls, fencing, evergreen hedges or a combination thereof. Hedges shall be maintained at
a height of 3 to 4 feet. Walls, fencing and hedges shall be located as follows:
• setback from the road at the minimum building setback; or
• between the parking and any hardscaped pedestrian area located between the road and the parking
area.
[6] Views of parking from adjacent property designated for single family residential use on the
comprehensive plan shall either be minimized by a building, or 3 to 4 foot high decorative walls,
fencing, evergreen hedges or a combination thereof. Hedges shall be maintained at a height of 3 to
4 feet.
[7] Height limits are subject to Article IV, Division 2.
A. Design Criteria for All Basins. In addition to the requirements of Section
19.1-212, all basins required by the director of environmental engineering as either
a stormwater management facility or a Best Management Practice for water quality
improvement or designed as a retention or detention facility for any new
development or redevelopment of property shall conform to the following criteria:
16-631
10/26/16
lk
Bikeway: Improvement specifically designed and designated to accommodate bicycle
travel whether within a road, shared use path, trail, or other approved facility. A
bikeway may include, or be a part of, facilities which also serve pedestrian or other
modes of non -motorized transportation. The term bikeway includes associated safety
measures such as, but not limited to, signage and road crossings, as well as provisions
for maintenance of the facilities.
Pedestrian way: Circulation system designed to be used primarily by pedestrians.
Shared use path: A form of infrastructure separated from motor vehicle traffic that
supports multiple modes of transportation such as bicycles, wheelchairs, pedestrians
and other non -motorized forms of transportation.
(2) That this ordinance shall become effective immediately upon adoption.
And further, the Board adopted the following ordinance:
AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE CODE OF THE COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD,
1997, AS AMENDED, BY AMENDING AND REENACTING SECTIONS 17-24,17-56,
17-62, and 17-71 OF THE SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE RELATING TO BIKEWAYS
BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County:
(1) That Sections 17-24, 17-56, 17-62, and 17-71 of the Code of the County of
Chesterfield, 1997, as amended, are amended and re-enacted, to read as follows:
Chapter 17
SUBDIVISION OF LAND
1. Sec. 17-24. Posting of public notice.
000
B. The validity of any action on an application, or transfer request as provided for in
this section, shall not be affected by the unauthorized removal of a notice which has
been duly posted in accordance with this section. Such posting shall occur for at
least 21 days before the planning commission hearing or date of administrative
action. No action on the applicable plat application may occur until after the notice
period.
Subdivision Application. If the director of planning receives a transfer request
from an aggrieved person within 15 days of the posting of the sign for a plat
under administrative review, the director shall refer the plat to the planning
commission for review pursuant to Sec. 17-21B. The transfer request shall state
reasons for concerns which shall be limited to conditions relating to streets,
access, water, wastewater, stormwater conveyance systems, stormwater
facilities, bikeways as provided in Sec. 19.1-208 or to the implementation of
conditions of zoning required to be complied with and implemented at the time
of plat approval.
16-632
10/26/16
2. Exception request. If the director of planning receives a transfer request from an
aggrieved person, within 15 days of the posting of the sign for a proposed
exception under administrative review, the director shall refer the exception
request to the planning commission for review pursuant to Sec. 17-8. The
transfer request pursuant to this subsection shall specify reasons for concern
with the granting of the exception.
C. A person is considered aggrieved for the purpose of requesting a transfer of review
to the planning commission as provided in this section if:
1. They are an owner, lessee or contract purchaser of property adjacent to the
subject property; or
2. They are an owner or lessee of property who will be adversely affected by the
approval of the subdivision application or exception in an immediate and
substantial manner not shared by the public generally.
A person shall not be considered adversely affected for purposes of this section by
any personal financial hardship anticipated as a result of business competition
associated with the proposed use.
000
Sec. 17-56. Plan and plat requirements.
It11
In addition to any requirements for a specific application,
Application Type
the following items shall be provided as specified for each
plat or plan type when the applicable column is marked
with an "X".
,a ..,
a
a
a
000
8 a
> �+
o
a
U
a
w
B. The following shall be provided and/or depicted, as
applicable
000
3. Individual lot area in square footage and the square
footage of each lot reduced in size based upon the
X
provisions of Chapter 19.1 regarding buffers and bikeways
000
22. Street, rights-of-way, and easement information:
a. Location, right of way width, state route number, and
name of any existing street within or adjacent to the
X
X
X
subdivision
b. Location, right-of-way width, and name of any
proposed street, bikeway and pedestrian network [81
X
X
X
c. Right-of-way dedication from the centerline of existing
street
X
X
d. All existing and proposed residential collector and local
streets shall be labeled with design traffic volumes
X
e. All arterial, collector, and limited access streets for
which a design is required shall be labeled with
classification, geometric design standard, design speed,
X
and design traffic volumes
f. Proposed streets with centerline curve data and any
sidewalks, pedestrian and bikeway facilities
X
g. Private pavement and fire access lanes
X
X
16-633
10/26/16
F1
P]
!7
D
In addition to any requirements for a specific application,
Application Type
the following items shall be provided as specified for each
plat or plan type when the applicable column is marked14
with an "X".
a
a
000
O a
a
a
a
h. The location, width, and purpose of all existing and
anticipated onsite easements, including any pedestrian,
X
X
X
bikeway and utility easements serving the subdivision
[91
i. The location, width, and purpose of all existing and
proposed offsite easements, including any pedestrian,
X
bikeway and utility easements serving the subdivision
Sec. 17-62. Standard conditions.
10. Final plats shall indicate the existing and proposed right-of-way dedications for all
streets and bikeways within or adjacent to the proposed subdivision.
000
Sec. 17-71. Designation of land for public use.
A. All subdivisions shall comply with the conditions of zoning and Chapter 19.1
requiring dedication or reservation of land for possible acquisition for public uses
including but not limited to: parks, schools, libraries, and fire stations.
B. Subdivisions shall accommodate public uses as required by conditions of zoning
and Chapter 19.1. Whenever a tract includes a proposed public use, it shall be
suitably incorporated by the subdivider into the plat after a determination is made
by the county whether such property is needed.
C. The planning commission or director of planning, based upon conditions of zoning
and Chapter 19.1 shall verify whether the land is to be:
1. Dedicated to the county by the subdivider, or
2. Made available for acquisition by the county.
D. The planning commission or director of planning shall verify that the land is:
1. Required for the proposed public use, and
2. Suitable for the proposed public use.
If it is determined that the land is not required, the director shall advise the
subdivider of said determination and, if allowed by conditions of zoning and
Chapter 19. 1, shall advise the subdivider as to the ability to rearrange lots in the
proposed subdivision to incorporate the land.
If it is determined that the land is not suitable for the proposed use, the planning
commission or director may refuse to approve such dedication or configuration and
require the rearrangement of lots in the proposed subdivision.
E. After it is verified that the land is:
1. Required to be dedicated and appropriate for the proposed public use, the
subdivider shall be informed of this finding, and shall proceed with the
preliminary plat approval process. When the plat is recorded, such recordation
shall constitute acceptance of the land for the designated public purpose.
16-634
10/26/16
2. Required to be made available for acquisition, and appropriate for the proposed
public use, the subdivider shall be informed of this finding. The director of
planning may also propose alternate areas on the subject parcel for acquisition.
The director of planning and the appropriate county officer or other public entity
involved in the acquisition or use of each such site shall seek a commitment to
purchase such site by the board of supervisors and shall include an estimate of
the time required to complete the acquisition. The planning commission or
director of planning shall not approve the plat for a minimum of 30 days to
allow the board of supervisors to act.
a. If the board of supervisors approves the request, the subdivider shall
designate on the plats that area proposed to be acquired by the board of
supervisors.
b. If the board of supervisors denies the request, the subdivider shall be advised
to incorporate the area as otherwise permitted by this chapter on the plat.
000
(2) That this ordinance shall become effective immediately upon adoption.
Ayes: Elswick, Jaeckle, Winslow, Holland and Haley.
Nays: None.
Mr. Holland made a motion, seconded by Ms. Haley, for the
Board to adopt the Eminent Domain Policy.
Discussion ensued regarding the use of eminent domain and the
fact the Board does not believe this will impose on citizen's
property rights.
Mr. Elswick stated that he supports an eminent domain related
ordinance, but not a policy.
Mr. Elswick then called for a vote on the motion of Mr.
Holland, seconded by Ms. Haley, for the Board to adopt the
Eminent Domain Policy.
Ayes: Jaeckle, Winslow, Holland and Haley.
Nays: Elswick.
18. REMAINING MANUFACTURED HOME PERMITS AND ZONING REQUESTS
There were no remaining manufactured home permits or zoning
requests at this time.
19. FIFTEEN -MINUTE CITIZEN COMMENT PERIOD ON UNSCHEDULED
MATTERS
Ms. Jarica Davis requested to comment on the substantial
accord report that was on the afternoon agenda.
Mr. Mincks stated she would not be able to speak to this
topic but could do so at the November 16 meeting.
16-635
10/26/16
Ic
P]
20. ADJOURNMENT
On motion of Mr. Holland, seconded by Ms. Winslow, the Board
adjourned at 9:13 p.m. until October 28, 2016, at 1:30 p.m.
for a joint work session of the Board of Supervisors and the
School Board in Room 502 at the County Administration
Building to discuss budget priorities.
Ayes: Elswick, Jaeckle, Winslow, Holland and Haley.
Nays: None.
Tos'eph P. Casey
County Administrator
Steph n A. Elswick
Chairman
16-636
10/26/16
9
PE
9