13SN0132
CASE NUMBER: 13SN0132 (AMENDED)
APPLICANTS: Chesterfield Business Partners LLC, Eastwood Homes of
Richmond, LLC and Kingsland Towncenter LLC
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY, VIRGINIA
DALE DISTRICT
STAFF’S ANALYSIS
AND RECOMMENDATION
Board of Supervisors Hearing: MARCH 15, 2017
Board of SupervisorsTime Remaining:365 DAYS
Applicants’ Agent:
JACK R. WILLSON III (804-425-9474)
Planning Department Case Manager:
RYAN RAMSEY (804-768-7592)
95.9 Acres – 6900 Iron Bridge Road
REQUEST
(AMENDED) Amendment of conditional uses (Cases 06SN0237 and 07SN0226) relative to
amendment of cash proffers in a Community Business (C-3) District. Specifically, deletion of
Proffered Condition 11 of Cases 06SN0237 and 07SN0226 is requested.
Notes: A. The only condition that may be imposed is a buffer condition. The property owner may proffer
conditions.
B. Proffered conditions, approved conditions of Cases 06SN0237 and 07SN0226, and an approved
architectural theme narrative for the development are located in Attachments 1 - 5.
SUMMARY
A mix of residential housing types, commonly known as the Watermark development, is being
developed. A maximum of 740 dwelling units are permitted, with 436 units impacted by this
request. The current zoning cases and proffered conditions provide specific design and
architectural standards (Summarized on Pages 7 & 8) for residential development that will be
compatible with existing area development.Acash proffer to address the development’s impacts
on roads, parks, libraries, fire stations and schools (Summarized on Page 6) is offered under the
existing zoning case.
To address impacts on roads, applicants have proffered to complete construction of an additional
lane of pavement along Route 10 for the entire property frontage and 2 lanes of a major arterial
(Kingsland Glen Extended) through the property, estimated to be valued at $1,594,185. The
applicants have also proffered to make payments for any unit above the total number of the various
unit types that would result in an impact to roads greater than $1,594,185.
RECOMMENDATIONS
APPROVAL
COMMISSION
AYES: Sloan, Freye, Jones and Wallin ABSTENTION: Jackson
PLANNING AND TRANSPORTATION – APPROVAL
STAFF
Quality design and architecture provide for a convenient, attractive, and
harmonious community.
Providing a FIRST CHOICE community through excellence in public service
RECOMMENDATIONS (CONTINUED)
Development’s traffic impact will be addressed by providing road
STAFF
improvements and cash payments.
SUMMARY OF IDENTIFIED ISSUES
Department Issue
The applicant has not offered to address pedestrian/bikeway connections to
PARKS AND
adjacent developments, as recommended in the Bikeways and Trails Chapter
RECREATION
of the Comprehensive Plan.
213SN0132-2017MAR15-BOS-RPT
313SN0132-2017MAR15-BOS-RPT
TABLE A
REQUEST PROPERTIES
Tax Identification Number Address
770-677-2778 7800 Swanhaven Dr
770-677-4773 6701 Swanhaven Dr
770-677-9777 6210 Kingsland Glen Dr
770-678-8131 6200 Kingsland Glen Dr
771-676-9014 7130 IronBridge Rd
771-677-10846912 Hawser Ln
771-677-1088 6904 Hawser Ln
771-677-1194 6816 Hawser Ln
771-677-1299 6808 Hawser Ln
771-677-1474 6924 Hawser Ln
771-677-1681 6916 Hawser Ln
771-677-1685 6908 Hawser Ln
771-677-1790 6900 Hawser Ln
771-677-1896 6812 Hawser Ln
771-677-2275 7000 Hawser Ln
771-677-2368 7004 Hawser Ln
771-677-2585 6734 Gibe Ln
771-677-2674 7008 Hawser Ln
771-677-2766 7012 Hawser Ln
771-677-2779 6730 Gibe Ln
771-677-2994 6729 Gibe Ln
771-677-3085 6726 Gibe Ln
771-677-3179 6722 Gibe Ln
771-677-3273 7016 Hawser Ln
771-677-3366 7020 Hawser Ln
771-677-3484 6718 Gibe Ln
771-677-3771 7024 Hawser Ln
771-677-3778 6712 Gibe Ln
771-677-3865 7028 Hawser Ln
771-677-3898 6717 Gibe Ln
771-677-4083 6708 Gibe Ln
771-677-4091 6713 Gibe Ln
771-677-4177 6704 Gibe Ln
771-677-4397 6709 Gibe Ln
771-677-4491 6705 Gibe Ln
771-677-4582 6700 Gibe Ln
771-677-4897 6701 Gibe Ln
771-678-1303 6800 Hawser Ln
771-678-1900 6804 Hawser Ln
772-676-2999 7100 Iron Bridge Rd
772-677-3568 6900 IronBridge Rd
413SN0132-2017MAR15-BOS-RPT
Comprehensive Plan
Classification: COMMUNITY BUSINESS & INDUSTRIAL
The designation suggests the property is appropriate for C-3 uses that serve community-wide
trade areas, and I-2 and limited I-3 uses such as moderate to intense manufacturing and uses
which normally have outside storage areas are appropriate. The Plan does not encourage
residential development under these two (2) land use designations. It should be noted,
however, that the allowable land uses were approved prior to the adoption of the Plan.
Surrounding Land Uses and Development
Single-family Residential
(Kings Forest Subdivision)
Kingsland Glen Drive
Single-family
Residential or Vacant
Iron Bridge Road
Single family Residential
(Watermark Subdivision)
513SN0132-2017MAR15-BOS-RPT
PLANNING
Staff Contact: Ryan Ramsey (804-768-7592) ramseyrp@chesterfield.gov
Zoning History
Case Request
Number
C-3 with conditional use and conditional use planned development to permit a mix
of multifamily, townhouse, and single-family residential, office, and commercial uses.
Proffered Condition 4 limited development to 650 units.
Proffered Condition 11 offered a contribution toward the impact on capital
facilities for each dwelling unit in excess of 150:
06SN0237
Non-age restricted-$22,773 ($15,600 escalated by the Marshall and Swift
Approved
Building Cost Index)
(3/2004)
Age restricted-$14,963 ($10,269 escalated by the Marshall and Swift
Building Cost Index)
The staff report for Case 06SN0237 analyzed the impact of the proposed
development on public facilities and the applicant’s offers to mitigate that
impact.
C-3 with conditional use and conditional use planned development to permit
multifamily and townhouse, and single-familyresidential, office, & commercial uses.
Proffered Condition 4 limiteddensity to 90 units.
Proffered Condition 11 offered a contribution toward the impact on capital
facilities for each dwelling unit:
07SN0226
Non-age restricted-$21,186 ($15,600 escalated by the Marshall and Swift
o
Approved
Building Cost Index)
(4/2007)
Age restricted-$13,946($10,269 escalated by the Marshall and Swift
o
Building Cost Index)
The staff report for Case 07SN0226 analyzed the impact of the proposed
development on public facilities and the applicant’s offers to mitigate that
impact.
613SN0132-2017MAR15-BOS-RPT
Chesterfield County Airport Operation Area
The request properties are partially located within the Airport Operation Area, as shown on the
Plan’s Land Use Plan Map. A previous condition of zoning addressed the notification of future
residential development within the Airport Operation Area by requiring the location of the
airport be placed on each subdivisionplat or included in a location plan for required
condominium documentation.
Proposal
Watermark, a mixed-use community,consists of commercial anda variety ofresidential uses,
including multifamily, townhouses, cluster, and single family dwellings. 740 total dwelling units
were permitted under the original zoning cases. As noted in the “Zoning History Section”, cash
proffers were required on a total of 590 dwelling units. Of those, proffers have been paid on 154
units, leaving up to 436 units subject to the cash proffer. Deletion of Proffered Condition 11 of
both zoning cases is requested to relieve payment of cash proffers on these remaining 436 units.
Of these 436 units, preliminary plat approval has been given for forty-nine (49) single-family or
small lot units and 269 townhouses (not including three (3) lots that have transferred to private
property owners). The remaining 118 dwellings could be developed as a mix of multi-family,
townhouse, small lot units or single-family based on the density restrictions set for in Case
06SN0237.
Design Requirements of Cases 06SN0237 and 07SN0226
The following provides an overview of design requirements approved with Cases 06SN0127 and
07SN0226 (Attachments 3-5):
Development Design Requirements
traditional neighborhood development design
requires a mix of residential and non-residential uses within a block and/or building
sidewalks
street trees
on-street parking
open space
alleys
recreational amenities, to include a community clubhouse and pool
approved architectural theme narrative for residential and commercial development,
which requires:
architectural style (traditional or transitional) and variation for townhouse and
o
single-family detached units, including variation in front building facades and
color of exterior building materials
prohibits highly stylized, overstated eclectic design elements, and overly mixed
o
housing styles
variety of architectural features, materials, and color palettes
o
formal arrangement of windows and varied application of porches, stoops,
o
columns, cornices, and trim materials
mitigate impact of garage doors visible to public streetsusing decorative lintels
o
or shed roof overhangs, raised panels or carriage house styles, and prohibiting
flat front garage doors
713SN0132-2017MAR15-BOS-RPT
Design
Quality residential development addresses the Comprehensive Plan goals for a strong and
sustainable neighborhood that is of high quality, visually attractive and well-maintained.
Further, quality development addresses the purpose and intent of the zoning ordinance to
promote the health, safety, convenience, and general welfare of the public to include the
creation of convenient, attractive,and harmoniouscommunities, protection against
overcrowding of land, and protection of the natural environment. As such, developments that
promote unique, viable and long lasting places, and enhance the community are encouraged.
The applicant has proffered the following design and architectural requirements for the
development (Attachment 2 - Proffered Conditions 1-4):
Community recreational facilities
clubhouse (minimum 4,400 square foot) and pool
o
building permit obtained for recreational facilities prior to the release of 150
o
certificate of occupancies for townhouse dwellings
recreational facilities completed prior to the release of 200 certificate of
o
occupancies for townhouse dwellings
facilities to be open to all residents who are active Watermark Homeowners
o
Association members
Variety of siding materials to include vinyl with minimum thickness of 0.44 inches
Hardscaped driveways and front walks
Decorative lamp posts for each townhouse and single-family detached unit
As suggested by Comprehensive Plan goals and zoning ordinance, the proffered conditions of
this current request along with those approved with Cases 06SN0237 and 07SN0226 include
design and architectural elements compatible in quality to the surrounding community.
813SN0132-2017MAR15-BOS-RPT
COUNTY TRANSPORTATION
Staff Contact: Jim Banks (804-748-1037) banksj@chesterfield.gov
Case 06SN0237 limits development on part of the property to 650 dwelling units, and Case
07SN0226 limits development on another part of the property to 90 dwelling units; a total of
740 dwelling units of various residential types (single-family, townhouse and apartment)
(Proffered Condition 4 ofCase 06SN0237 and Proffered Condition 4 ofCase 07SN0226).
Approximately 304 units have been developed. The development of the remaining property is
not limited to a specific land use; therefore, it is difficult to anticipate traffic generation. Based
on an assumed density of 43 single-family units, 267 townhouse units and 126 apartment units
and applying trip generation rates for the various land uses, the proposed development could
generate approximately 2,833 average daily trips. Traffic generated by development of the
property would be initially distributed along Iron Bridge Road (Route 10). With completion of
Kingsland Glen Drive, traffic will also be distributed to Cogbill Road.
Route 10 is a Major Arterial with a recommended right of way width of 120 to 200 feet, as
identified on the County’s Thoroughfare Plan. This section of Route 10 is currently four-lanes
wide. In 2015, the traffic count on Route 10 between Kingsland Road and Cogbill Road was
31,995 (Level of Service “C”).
Cogbill Road is a Major Arterial with a recommended right of way width of 90 feet, as identified
on the County’s Thoroughfare Plan. Cogbill Road is currently two-lanes wide. Sections of the
road have been improved. Other sections of the road are substandard, with approximately 10-
foot lane widths and no usable shoulders. VDOT minimum geometric design standards
recommend this road have 12-foot lane widths and 10 foot shoulders. In 2015, the traffic count
for the section of Cogbill Road west of Route 10 was 5,150 vehicles per day (Level of Service
“D”).
Section 19.1-231 of the County Code outlines the general requirements to meet the needs of
the traffic generated by a proposed development, including acceptable levels of service. This
proposed residential development would contribute to an identifiable need for transportation
improvements.
The property is located within Traffic Shed 7, which encompasses the area of the County
bounded by Hull Street Road, Chippenham Parkway, Route 10, and Route 288. Several roads in
this traffic shed or which serve this traffic shed are substandard, with little or no shoulders,
fixed objects (trees) adjacent to the edge of the pavement, and poor vertical and horizontal
alignments. The traffic volume generated from this proposed residential development will
contribute to an identifiable need for transportation facility improvements to these roads in
excess of existing transportation facility capacity. Roads in this shed or which serve this shed
need to be improved or widened to address safety and accommodate increased traffic,
including the increased traffic from the proposed development.
An applicant may choose to address the development’s impact on the county’s road
transportation network through dedication of property, construction of road improvements, or
a cash proffer. If an applicant elects to offer cash to address the impact on the county’s road
transportation network, Transportation staff has calculated the average impact of a single-
913SN0132-2017MAR15-BOS-RPT
family dwelling unit on the transportation network to be $12,652; however, the Board of
Supervisors has adopted a policy establishing that it would accept a maximum cash proffer of
$9,400 per dwelling unit as addressing the trafficimpacts of residential development, with all of
the funds to be dedicated towards improvements to the road network. The Policy allows the
county to consider mitigating circumstances about a proposed development. In this case, the
residential development is not limited to a specific type. Based on the volume of traffic it
generates:
-family unit traffic impact could be addressed by $9,400 per unit.
it, which generates 63% of the traffic of single-family dwelling unit,
traffic impact could be addressed by $5,922per unit.
-family dwelling unit, traffic
impact could be addressed by $5,640 per unit.
Proffered Conditions 14.A and E of Case 06SN0237 requires the applicant to provide an
additional lane of pavement along Route 10 for the entire property frontage and construct 2
lanes of a major arterial (Kingsland Glen Extended) through the property. Parts of both road
improvements have been completed. The unconstructed portions of these road improvements
have been estimated to be valued at approximately $1,594,185. It should be noted, however,
that the actual cost to provide these improvements could be more or less than this amount.
An approved phasing plan for the property requires the construction Kingsland Glen Extended
prior to recording more than 64 units. The estimated cost of this road improvement has been
valued at approximately $819,555. The traffic impact of 138 townhouse units could be
addressed with a payment of $817,236 ($5,922 x 138). The applicant has proffered to construct
the additional lane of pavement along Route 10 prior to development of more than a total of
138 townhouse units or equivalent traffic impact. (Proffered Condition 6)
The applicant has also proffered to make payments for any residential unit beyond the total
number of units that would result in an impact of $1,594,185 (Proffered Condition 5). Staff
supports the request.
1013SN0132-2017MAR15-BOS-RPT
FIRE AND EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES
Staff Contact: Anthony Batten (717-6167) battena@chesterfield.gov
Mission
The mission of Fire and Emergency Medical Services (EMS) is to protect life, property and the
environment through a comprehensive fire and life safety program that ensures an adequate
and timely response to emergencies.
Response Times
The proposed development is located in the urban response zone for which Fire & EMS has a
goal of responding to at least 90% of the calls for service in under seven (7) minutes. Fire and
EMS is currently unable to meet that goal.
Nearby Fire/EMS Facility
The Dale Fire Station, Company Number 11
Anticipated Fire & EMS Impacts/Needs
Based on an average of 0.197 calls per dwelling, it is estimated that this development will
generate 87annual calls for Fire/EMS services.
Additional Fire and EMS Comments
When the property is developed, the number of hydrants, quantity of water needed for fire
protection, and access requirements will be evaluated during the plans review process.
1113SN0132-2017MAR15-BOS-RPT
SCHOOLS
Staff Contact: Atonja Allen (804-318-8740) atonja_allen@ccpsnet.net
Mission
High performing, high quality public schools contribute to the quality of life and economic
vitality of the County. The Comprehensive Plan suggests a greater focus should be placed on
linking schools with communities by providing greater access, flexible designs and locations that
better meet the needs of the communities in which they are located.
Capital Improvements
The School Board FY2017 adopted Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) continues to support the
2013 voter approved school revitalization program that will replace or renovate 10 schools and
construct 1 new elementary school to add capacity in the Midlothian area.The 10 existing
facilities that are part of the revitalization program are Providence Middle School, Monacan
High School, Manchester Middle School, Beulah Elementary School, Enon Elementary School,
Matoaca Elementary School, Harrowgate Elementary School, Reams Elementary School,
Crestwood Elementary School, and Ettrick Elementary School. The project at Providence
Middle School is currently under construction, and the project at Monacan High School is
complete. Additional information on the CIP can be found in the financial section of the CCPS
Adopted Budget for FY2017.
Anticipated School Impacts
Enrollment
Anticipated Schools Percent of
Functional Number of Current
Student Yield by Currently Total
Capacity Trailers Enrollment
School Type Serving Area Functional
Capacity
Elementary 81 Hopkins 564 5 587 104
Middle 38 Falling Creek125514 1189 95
High54 Bird20205 1829 91
Total \[1\] 173
Note:
\[1\] Based upon average number of students per single family dwelling unit countywide (0.48 students per
unit), townhouse dwelling unit countywide (0.41 students per unit), and multifamily dwelling unit countywide
(0.33 students per unit)
Additional Schools Comments
While this zoning request will not increase the number of dwelling units permitted by the
existing zoning, based on current total school system capacityand student enrollment
projections, it is anticipated that thisdevelopment will have an impact on school capacities
division-wide.
1213SN0132-2017MAR15-BOS-RPT
LIBRARIES
Staff Contact: Jennifer Stevens (804-751-4998) stevensj@chesterfield.gov
Mission
The public library system’s role has expanded beyond its traditional function as a resource for
information and materials, and now serves as a community gathering place for educational,
cultural, and informational services; community support during emergencies; economic
development; and revitalization activities.
Nearby Libraries
Meadowdale Library
Central Library
PARKS AND RECREATION
Staff Contact: Stuart Connock (804-751-4484) ConnockS@chesterfield.gov
Mission
The County supports a high quality park system to provide residents and visitors with equitable
access to active and passive recreation opportunities. The 2012 level of service is 5.9 acres of
regional, community and neighborhood parkland per 1,000 persons whereas thetarget level of
service is 9 acres per 1,000 persons.
Nearby Parks Facilities
Daniel Regional Park
Stratton Community Park
Bird Athletic Complex
Fairgrounds Park
Public Facilities Plan
The Public Facilities Plan identifies the need for a community park, consisting of approximately 90
acres, near this location. Land for this community park has not been acquired.
The Bikeways and Trails Chapter of the Comprehensive Plan recommends that both pedestrian
and bicycle facilities be developed along Route 10 and that connections from routes shown on the
plan be made to adjacent developments.
Bicycle only facilities are located along Ironbridge Road. Existing conditions of zoning require
construction of a sidewalk along Route 10, consistent with the recommendations of the plan. The
applicant has not, however, offered to provide pedestrian and bicycle connections to adjacent
developments, consistent with the recommendations of the plan.
1313SN0132-2017MAR15-BOS-RPT
UTILITIES
Staff Contact: Jamie Bland (804-751-4439) blandj@chesterfield.gov
ENVIRONMENTAL
Staff Contact: Rebeccah Ward(804-748-1028) WardR@chesterfield.gov
VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Staff Contact: Brian Lokker (804-674-2384) brian.lokker@vdot.virginia.gov
This proposal will not impact these facilities.
1413SN0132-2017MAR15-BOS-RPT
CASE HISTORY
Applicant Submittals
8/31/12 Application submitted
1/23/13 Application amended
7/8/13 Revised proffered condition and pattern book of development standards were
submitted
9/26/13 Revised proffered condition were submitted
10/2,
10/15, Revised proffered conditions and a revised design guidelines manual were
10/23, submitted
11/8/13
1/28, 2/10,Revised proffered conditions were submitted
2/11/16
2/18/16 Application amended
3/23/16 Revised proffered condition submitted
9/19, 10/11 Revised application submitted
& 10/17/16
2/10/17 Revised proffered condition submitted
Community Meetings
11/29/16 Issues Discussed
Phasing of recreational amenities
Concerns expressed relative to a reduction in cash proffer payments
Questions concerning how new public facilities will be funded in County
without a cash proffer payment for residential development
1/18/17Issues Discussed
Phasing of recreational amenities for Watermark residents
Concerns expressed relative to a reduction in cash proffer payments
Questions concerning how new public facilities will be funded in County
without a cash proffer payment for residential development
Possible commercial tenants for outparcels fronting Route 10
Planning Commission Meetings
11/15/12 On their own motion and without the applicant’s consent, the Commission
deferred this case to February 19, 2013.
2/19/13 On their own motion and with the applicant’s consent, the Commission deferred
this case to May 21, 2013.
5/21/13 On their own motion and with the applicant’s consent, the Commission deferred
this case to July 16, 2013.
7/16/13 On their own motion and with the applicant’s consent, the Commission deferred
this case to September 17, 2013.
1513SN0132-2017MAR15-BOS-RPT
Planning Commission Meetings (Continued)
9/17/13 On their own motion and with the applicant’s consent, the Commission deferred
this case to November 19, 2013.
11/19/13 At the request of the applicant, the Commission deferred this case to January 21,
2014
1/23/14 Due to inclement weather, the Planning Commission public hearing scheduled for
January 21, 2014 was postponed to January 23, 2014.
At the request of the applicant, the Commission deferred this case to March 18,
2014.
3/18/14 At the request of the applicant, the Commission deferred this case to July 15,
2014.
7/22/14 Due to planned renovations to the public meeting room, the Commission
rescheduled their July 15, 2014 public hearing forJuly 22, 2014.
On their own motion and with the applicant’s consent, the Commission deferred
this case to October 21, 2014 .
10/21/14 At the request of the applicant, the Commission deferred this case to January 20,
2015.
1/20/15 At the request of the applicant, the Commission deferred this case to March 17,
2015.
3/17/15 At the request of the applicant, the Commission deferred this case to June 16,
2015.
6/16/15 The applicant did not accept staff’s recommendation, but did accept the Planning
Commission’s recommendation.
The applicant noted that the original cases allowed for a reduced cash proffer for
age-restricted dwellings, and that this proposal represents a recalibrationof those
figures.
There were no citizens to speak for or against this case.
TheCommission discussed the Board’s history of accepting a reduced cash proffer
for age-restricted dwellings. It was noted the Board would be reviewing the Policy
and any Policy changes should be at the Board level.
On motion of Dr. Brown, seconded by Mr. Gulley, the Commission recommended
approval and acceptance of a proffered condition.
AYES: Messrs. Brown, Gulley, Patton, Waller, and Wallin.
12/20/16 On their own motion and with the applicant’s consent, the Commission deferred
this case to February 21, 2017.
1613SN0132-2017MAR15-BOS-RPT
Planning Commission (Continued)
2/21/17Citizen Comments:
No citizens spoke to the request.
Commission Discussion:
Mr. Jackson advised the Commission that he would abstain from voting on this
case, noting that the Board continued their discussion of the Road Cash Proffer
policy until April.
Recommendation - APPROVAL AND ACCEPTANCE OF THE CONDITION AND
PROFFERED CONDITIONS IN ATTACHMENTS 1 & 2
Motion: Wallin Second: Freye
AYES: Sloan, Freye, Jones and Wallin
ABSTENTION:Jackson
The Board of Supervisors on Wednesday, March 15, 2017, beginning at 6:30p.m., will
consider this request.
1713SN0132-2017MAR15-BOS-RPT
Board of Supervisors
7/22/15 At the request of the applicant, the Board deferred this case to their September
16, 2015 public hearing.
9/16/15 At the request of the applicant, the Board deferred this case to their February 24,
2016 public hearing.
2/24/16 At the request of the applicant, the Board deferred this case to their April 27, 2016
public hearing.
4/27/16 As a result of significant changes to the application subsequent to the
Commission’s action, the Board remanded the case to the Commission for
reconsideration.
1813SN0132-2017MAR15-BOS-RPT
ATTACHMENT 1
CONDITION
Note:
Both the Planning Commission and staff recommend acceptance of the following condition.
With approval of this request, Proffered Conditions 11 of Cases 06SN0237 and 07SN0226 are
deleted for the subject properties only. (P)
1913SN0132-2017MAR15-BOS-RPT
ATTACHMENT 2
PROFFERED CONDITIONS
Note:
Both the Planning Commission and staff recommend acceptance of the following proffered
condition, as offered by the applicant.
The property owner and applicant in this case, pursuant to Section 15.2-2298 of the Code of
Virginia (1950 as amended) and the Zoning Ordinance of Chesterfield County, for themselves
and their successors and assigns, proffer that the property under consideration (“the Property”)
will be developed according to the following proffers if, and only if, the request submitted
herewith is granted with only those conditions agreed to by the owner and applicant. In the
event this request is denied or approved with conditions not agreed to by the owner and
applicant, the proffers shall immediately be null and void and of no further force or effect.
Community Recreational Facility. In addition to the requirements of Proffered Condition
1.
8 of Case 06SN0237, a community clubhouse with a minimum size of 4,400 gross square
feet, architecturally compatible with the adjoining buildings or dwellings, a pool, and
playground area shall be provided. Prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy for
150 townhouse dwelling units (including those units with certificates of occupancy in
Watermark Townhomes, Section 1), building permits shall have been obtained for the
clubhouse and pool. Prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy for 200
townhouse dwelling units (including those units with certificates of occupancy in
Watermark Townhomes, Section 1), the clubhouse shall have been issued a certificate
of occupancy, and the pool and playground area shall be completed for use. This
community recreation facility shall serve and be open to any resident who is an active
member of the Watermark Homeowners Association. (P)
Decorative Lamp Posts. A decorative, pedestrian-scaled, lamp post shall be provided in
2.
the front yard for each single-family or townhouse dwelling. (P)
Acceptable Building Materials. Acceptable siding materials shall include brick, masonry,
3.
stucco, synthetic stucco (E.I.F.S.), or lap siding.Lap siding may be manufactured from
natural wood or cement fiber board or may be premium quality vinyl siding with a
minimum wall thickness of .044 inches. Synthetic Stucco (E.I.F.S.) siding shall be finished
in a smooth, sand or level texture, no rough textures are permitted. (P)
Driveways. All private driveways serving residential uses shall be constructed of either
4.
concrete or asphalt. (P)
Road Cash Proffer. For each dwelling unit the applicant shall pay a cash proffer to the
5.
County of Chesterfield for road improvements within the service district for the
property. Each payment shall be made prior to the issuance of a building permit for a
dwelling unit, unless state law modifies the timing of the payment. The amount of the
cash proffer payments for each unit shall be as follows: single-family, $9,400;
townhouse, $5,922; and apartment, $5,640 (the “Road Cash Proffer Payment”). Once
units have been approved for payments that would exceed a cumulative total of
2013SN0132-2017MAR15-BOS-RPT
$1,594,185, the applicant shall begin making the Road Cash Proffer Payment for any
additional unit(s). (T)
Phasing. Prior to issuance of a building permit for any unit in excess of a cumulative total
6.
of 138 townhouse units or equivalent as determined by the Transportation Department,
the additional lane of pavement along Route 10, as identified in Proffer Condition 14. A
of Case 06SN0237, shall be completed. If the lane of pavement along Route 10 is not
completed, as determined by the Transportation Department, the Road Cash Proffer
Payment shall be made until the additional lane is completed. (T)
2113SN0132-2017MAR15-BOS-RPT
ATTACHMENT 3
APPROVED PROFFERED CONDITIONS & TEXTUAL STATEMENT (06SN0237)
2213SN0132-2017MAR15-BOS-RPT
2313SN0132-2017MAR15-BOS-RPT
2413SN0132-2017MAR15-BOS-RPT
2513SN0132-2017MAR15-BOS-RPT
2613SN0132-2017MAR15-BOS-RPT
2713SN0132-2017MAR15-BOS-RPT
2813SN0132-2017MAR15-BOS-RPT
2913SN0132-2017MAR15-BOS-RPT
3013SN0132-2017MAR15-BOS-RPT
3113SN0132-2017MAR15-BOS-RPT
3213SN0132-2017MAR15-BOS-RPT
3313SN0132-2017MAR15-BOS-RPT
3413SN0132-2017MAR15-BOS-RPT
3513SN0132-2017MAR15-BOS-RPT
3613SN0132-2017MAR15-BOS-RPT
3713SN0132-2017MAR15-BOS-RPT
3813SN0132-2017MAR15-BOS-RPT
3913SN0132-2017MAR15-BOS-RPT
4013SN0132-2017MAR15-BOS-RPT
4113SN0132-2017MAR15-BOS-RPT
4213SN0132-2017MAR15-BOS-RPT
4313SN0132-2017MAR15-BOS-RPT
ATTACHMENT 4
APPROVED PROFFERED CONDITIONS & TEXTUAL STATEMENT (07SN0226)
4413SN0132-2017MAR15-BOS-RPT
4513SN0132-2017MAR15-BOS-RPT
4613SN0132-2017MAR15-BOS-RPT
4713SN0132-2017MAR15-BOS-RPT
4813SN0132-2017MAR15-BOS-RPT
4913SN0132-2017MAR15-BOS-RPT
5013SN0132-2017MAR15-BOS-RPT
5113SN0132-2017MAR15-BOS-RPT
5213SN0132-2017MAR15-BOS-RPT
5313SN0132-2017MAR15-BOS-RPT
5413SN0132-2017MAR15-BOS-RPT
5513SN0132-2017MAR15-BOS-RPT
5613SN0132-2017MAR15-BOS-RPT
ATTACHMENT 5
APPROVED ARCHITECTURAL THEME NARATIVE
5713SN0132-2017MAR15-BOS-RPT