04SN0133-Jan 28.pdf STAFF'S
REQUEST ANALYSIS
RECOMMENDATION
xT ..... ~-~- ,o ~nn~ CPC
January 28, 2004 BS
04SN0133
Gary T, and Bonnie A. Jennings
Matoaca MagiSterial District.
Grange Hall Elementary School, Swift Creek Middle School and .
Clover Hi'Il High School' AttendanceZones
South line of Hull Street Road
REQUEST: Rezoning from Agricultural (A) to Residential (R-12) on 29.8 acres plus a
Conditional Use Planned Development on 73 acres relative to access in. an
Agricultural (A) District.
PROPOSED LAND USE:
A single family residential subdivision with a mmm of fiflT-five (55) lots is
planned, yielding a density of approximately 1.9 :dwelling unitsper acre;
PLANNING COMM/SSION RECOMMENDATION
RECOMMEND APPROVAL AND ACCEPTANCE OF. THE PROFFERED CONDITIONS ON
PAGES 2 THROUGH 4.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Recommend denial for the following reason:
Although the Upper Swift Creek,Plan suggests that the,northemportionof the property,.
north of the future. Hampton Park Drive Extended, is appropriateforoffice and residential
development of up to ten (10) units per acre, while the southern portion :of the property,
south of the proposed Hampton Park Drive Extended, is aPPropriate for single family
residential development of two (2) units per acre or less, the :~equest falls to address
Providing a FIRST CHOICE Community Through Excellence in Public Service.
· Transportation e'oncems relative' to the separation of access points along Hull Street Road
(Route 360), as discussed herein.
(NOTE: 'CONDITIONS MAY BE IMPOSED OR THE PROPERTY OWNER MAY PROFFER
CONDITIONS ON THE CONDITIONAL USE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PORTION OF
THE REQUEST. THE ONLY CONDITION THAT MAY BE IMPOSED ONTHE REZONING
PORTION OF THE REQUEST IS A BUFFER CONDITION. THE-PROPERTY OWNER(S)
MAY PROFFER OTHER CONDITIONS. THE CONDITIONS NOTED WITH-"STAFF/CPC"
WERE AGREED UPON.' BY BOTH STAFF AND THE .COMMISSION. CONDITIONS WITH
ONLY A "STAFF" ARE RECOMMENDED SOLELY BY' STAFF; CONDITIONS WITH
ONLY A "CPC" ARE ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS RECOMMENDED BY'THE PLANNING
COMMISSION.)
PROFFERED CONDITIONS
(cpc)
(cPc)
(cpc)
(cpc) 4.
Public water and wastewater shall be used. (U).
The applicant, subdivider, or assignee(s), shall pay the following to the
county of Chesterfield prior to the issuance of ~a building permit, for
infrastructure improvements with in the service district for the property:
Ce
$9,000:00 per dwelling unit, if paid priorto July 1, 2003; or
The.mOunt approved by the Board of Supervisors not to exceed
$9,000:00 per dwelling unit adjusted upward bY any increase in the
Marshall' and Swift building cost index :between July 1,2002, and
July 1 of the fiscal year in which the payment is made if paid after
June 30, 2003.
In the. event the cash payment is not Used for which proffered
within 15 years of receipt, the cash shall be .returned in full to the
payor, lB&M)
Except for timbering approved 'by the Virginia State Department-of
Forestry for the purpose of removing dead or ddiseased trees, there shall be
no timbering on the Property 'until a land disturbance permit has been
obtained from. the Environmental Engineering Departmem. and the
approved devices installed. (EE)
Direct access from the property to Hull Street.Road (Route 360)shall be
limited to one O)public road (the "PublicRoad'). The exact location of
this access-shall be approved by the TranSportation Department. Prior to
any construction plan approval, an access .:easement acceptable to the
Transportation-Department shall be recorded from the Public Road to .the
adjacent property to the east (Tax ID # 708-667-8988) and to.the adjacent
property to the west (Tax ID # 708-666-5170). (T)
2 04SN0133-JAN28-BOS
(cpc)
(cPc)
(cpc)
e
In conjunction with the recordation of the initial Subdivision plat, one
hundred (100) feet-of right ofway on the south' side of Hull Street Road,
measured from the centerline of that part of Hull Street Road immediately
adjacent tothe property, shall be dedicated, free and unrestricted, to and
for the benefit of Chesterfield.County. (T)
In conjunctiOn with recordation of the initial subdivision plat a ninety (90)
foot wide fight-of-way for an east/west' arterial ("Hampton park Drive
Extended") from the eastern property line to the western Property line shall
be dedicated, free and unrestricted, to and for the benefit of Chesterfield
County. The exact location of this right;of-way shall.be approved bythe
Transportation Department. (T)
To provide an adequate roadway system-.at the rune of complete
development, the Owner/developer shall be responsible for the following:
ao
Construction of additional-pavement along Route 360 at the Public
Road intersection to provide a right turn lane, if warranted, based
on TranSportation Department standards;
Closing the existing crossover on :Route 360 located approximately
two hundred (200) feet east of the property and construction 0fa
new crossover, including left mm lanes along both the eastbound
and westbound lanes, on Route 360at the Public Road intersection.
If the Virginia Department of TransportatiOn does not approve the
closing of the existing crossover, and constructing the new
crossover, the developer shall' .then. be required to construct an
eastbound left turn lane at the existing-crossover on Ronte 360
located approximately two'hundred (20'0) feet east of the property;
Construction of two (2) lanes of Hampton Park Drive Extended
through the property.to VDOT urban minor arterial standards (50
mph), with modifications approved by the Transportation
Department;
Construction of the Public Road as a three (3)'lane typical section
at the Route 360 intersection~ The exact length of 'this
improvement shall be determined by the TransPortation
Department;
go
Construction of an additional lane of pavement along Route 360
from the Public Road to the eastern property .line of the adjacent
parcel (Tax ID 708'667-8988);
3 04SN0133-JAN28-BOS
(cpc)
(cpc)
(CPC)
(CPC)
(cpc)
(cpc)
o
10~
ll.
13.
Construction of a twenty-four (24). foot access drive from the
public rOM to the adjacent property (Tax ID 708-667-8988): The
exact location and treatment of'this improvement shall be
-determined-by the Transportation Department. --
Dedication to Chesterfield County, free and unrestricted, any
additional- right-of-way (or easements) reqUired:~ for the
improvements idemifi,e,d_ abov,e,, In the eventthe develOper is
unable to'acquire any off-site ~ right-of-way that is neceSsa~ for
anyimprovement described in 7 a~, .the?developer.may request, in
writing, that the County acquire:sUChright,of, wa¥ as a'pub}ic road
improvement. All costs associated w/th the acquisition. :of the'
right-of-way shall be bOrne by:the developer.. In-the evem,the
County chOoses not to assist the develOper in acquisition:of the -.
"off, site", right.of, way, the developer sh~l be relieved .'of the
obligation m acquire' the "off-site" right~,of~Way;and shall prOvide
the roM.improvements within available fightzof_Way as determined
bythe Transportation Department. (T)
Prior to any construction plan approval,, a phasing .Plan for the required
road improvements, as identified in Proffer~ C;ndition. 7, sh~ll .be
submitted to .:and~ 'approved .by the Transportation', ~:Departmentf The
.approved phasing Plan shall include proving the.imProvements described
m proffered conditions. 7a,'. 7b, 7e, 7f and 7g .in eonj:unetion with' initial
development.on the property. (T)
The property located north of the proposed east/west arterial or zoned
Agfic_~.tur~ (A),and defined bY the l~tSof this zo~grequest shall:: not
be subdivided other than for the Public Road:.or for the'Hampton?ark
Drive Extendedrights of way,. nor shall any residential building 'permit be
issuedon suchpmperty. ~) '"'
The existing pond shall remain. (EE)
All exposed portionS of the foundation of each' dwelling Unit shall be faced
with brick or stone veneer. Exposed piers supPo~g -from porches shall
be faced with brick or stone veneer. (P)
The minimum gross floor area for dwelling units shall be 2500 square feet.
The maximum: density of this developmem shall not exceed '55 total lots:
(P)
4 04SN0133-JAN28cBOS
GENERAL INFORMATION
Location:
South line of Hull Street Road, approximately 2,300 feet east of Baldwin Creek Road.
Tax IDs 708-665-9636; 708-666-7360 and 9340; 708-667,7101 and .8937; and 709-665-
3176; 709-666-2039, 3731 'and 4163' (Sheets 15 and 23).
Existing Zoning:
A
Size:
37.7 acres
Existing Land Use:
Single family residential or vacant
Adjacent Zoning and Land Use:
North - C-2, C-3 and C-5; Commercial, single family residential or vacant
South -- A; Vacant
'East - A and R-9; Vacant
West - A; Single family residential or vacant
UTILITIES
Public Water System:
There is an existing twenty~four (24) inch water line that extends .along the north side of
Hull Street Road and terminates adjacent to .Hampton Park Drive, approximately 7,200
feet east of this site. In addition, there is an existing tWelve (12) inch water line that
extends along the north side.of Hampton Park Drive and terminates approximately 1,600
feet east of this site. Use of the.public water system is intended. (Proffered Condition .1)
Computer generated flow tests have been performed to evaluate the water pressure and
flows available to serve this site. Tests indicate that a portion of this'site, when served
only by an extension from the tWelve (12) inch water line in Hampton Park Drive, may be.
unable to achieve minimum fire flows of 1,000 gpm at 20: psi residual, Depending upon
Fire Department requirements, it may be necessary to provide for extension of a twelve
(12) inch or larger water line across HullStreet Roadto allow for a future eonneefionto
the-twenty-four (24) inch water line. Further evaluation Will be necessary to determine if
5 04SN0133-JAN28-BOS
portions of this 'site will have dOmestic static pressures of less than 40 psi and provision
made to provide individual booster pumps where needed.
Public WasteWater System:
There is an existing fifteen (15) inch wastewater trunk line extending along a portion, of '
Dry Creek that terminates south:of Hampton Valley Terrace,_. approximately 3,600'feet
southeast of this site. The request.site is within the boundary.of the Upper Swift Creek
Plan which recommends use of the public wastewater system. Use of the public
wastewater system is intended. (Proffered Condition 1)_~
ENVIRONMENTAL
Drainage and Erosion:
The subject property drains'to the east and then via tributaries .to Dry Creek:and Swift
Creek Reservoir. There are currently no on- or off-site.'erosion Problems with-none
anticipated after development. 'The parcel is partially wooded and;-a~ such; shoUld~.not be
timbered without obtaining a land disturbance pemfit, Thi. s:.~l insure' that adeqnate
erosion cOntrol measures are in plaCe prior m any landdisturbance.. (Profferedcon/dition
Water Qualitv:
The property is situated in the Upper Swift Creek Reservoir ~ge basin and, as such,
will be subject to a pro,rata:fee for construction of regi~mal B~S and maintenance fee.
The applicant has proffered'to retain the eXisting pondlOeated:0nl, the pr°petty,-which:will
provide additional filtering of pollutants. (proffered Condition ~0)'
PUBLIC FACILITIES
The need: for fire, school, library, . park and transportation facilities;i-is identified in the:pUblic
FacilitieSPlan, the Thoroughfare Plan:and the Capital Improvement' P~ogram:. This development
will have an-impact on these facilities;
Fire Service.:
The Public. Facilities Plan indicates that emergency serviccsealls:are :expeCted.to:increase
forty-five (45) Percent by 2015;, Eight (8) new fi~e/re~cUe~S~tio~ iare~recomme~ded fot~
construction by 2015 inthe Plan: Based on fifty-five (sS):dweit g. units, this reqUest.~ll:
generate approximatelY, nine (9) calls for fire.and emergency me~cal- Services each.yea~.
The apPlicant has addressed the-impact on fire service~. (pmffei~ed Condition 2):"
The 'Clover Hill Fire/ResCue Station, Company Number-17, .currently provides, fire
protection and emergency medical service. When the prope~ is'develoPed, the.number
6 :04SN0t 33,JAN2.82BOS
of hydrants, quantity of water needed for fire protection and access requirements will be
evaluated during the plans review process.
Schools:
Approximately thirty (30) school age children will be generated by this development.
The site lies in the Grange Hall Elementary School attendance zone: capacity- 828,
enrollment - 622; SWift Creek Middle School zone:, capa~ty- 1,027, enrollment -
1,436; and Clover Hill High School zone: capacity.- 1,582, enrollment- 2,030.
This development will have impact on the middle and high schOols involved2 Two (2)
new high schools, proposed to be built by 2006, would replace Clover Hill High School
and relieve Manchester High.
,There are' currently eight (8): trailers at' Swift Creek Middle.and. Seventeen (17) trailers at
Clover Hill High School. 'The applicant has agreed to participate in the cost of providing
for area school needs. (Proffered Condition 2)
Libraries:
COnsiStent with Board of Supervisors' Policy, the impact of. development on library
services, is assessed County-wide. Based on projected, population growth, the' Public
Facilities Plan identifies a need for additional library space, throughout the County. Even
if the' facility improvements, that have been made since the. Plan-was published are taken
into account, there is still an unmet need for additional library space thrOughout the
County.
This development would imPact the existing .Clover Hill .-library or one (1)'of the
proposed new facilities for the western part of the County. in-the Geuito Road and west
Beach Road areas. The applicant has offered measures to assist lin addressing the impact
ofthisdevelopment on these faci~ties. (Proffered Condition 2)
Parks and Recreation:
The Public Facilities Plan identifies the need for four (4) new regional parks. In addition,
there is currently a shortage of community park acreage in the County. The Plan
identifies a need for 625 acres of regional park .space and 116 acres Of C6fnmunity park
space by 201'5. 'The Plan also-identifies the need for neighborhood parks and special
purpose parks and makes suggestions for their locations.
The applicant has offered measures to assist in addressing the impact of this proposed
develo'~ment on these Parks and Recreation facilities. (Proffered Condition 2)
7 04SN0133-JAN28-BOS
Transportation:
The property (approximately thirty-eight (38)acres) is currently, zoned Agricultural (A)
and is located just west of the Hampton park Subdivision on the south side of Hull Street
Road (Route 360). The applicant is requesting rezoning fxom Agricultural (A)to
Residential (R-12) on 29~8 acres and a Conditional Use Planned. Development (CUPD) to
permit eoustruefion of public road(s) on 7.9 aeres~ The applicant has proffered to limit
development to a maximum of fifbj-five (55) loTM (proffered Condition 13). Based on
single .family trip rates, development could generate-approximately 600 average daily
trips. These vehicles will be distributed along_Route 360, which had a 2003 traffieeotmt
of 20,451 vehicles per day. between Skinquarter Road. and Woodlake Village Parkway:.
The Thoroughfare Plan identifies Route 360 as a major'arterial with: a-reCommended right-
of way Width of 120 to 200 feet, The applicant has proffered to dedicate: 1~00 feet ofright
of way on the south side.of Route360, measured fxomthe eenteryme, in~ accordance with
that Plan. (proffered Condition 5)
The Thoroughfare Plan also identifies an east/west ..arterial ("Hampton'.Park Drive
Extended") that passes through the property. Thi's proposed .~oadWay:.extends fr6m the
current endpoint of Hampton!Park. Drive ~ugh the proPe~:west-~o Doss ROad.. The
applicant has proffered to dedieate a ninety (90)foot'wi& ;~fight ~'of. Way through '. the
property in accordance with that.Plan.. (proffered Condition.6) - ~
Staff Cannot support.the applicant's proposed access .to .Route 3160, Access'to' major
arterials,, such as Route 360, should be controlled: Due to-the-existing.accesses along!this '
section of Route 360 and the limited. Route 360 fron-.tage~. Of the subject property
(approximately 100 feet)i direct a~eess should: not. be Pr%id~°m the sul~jeet -i~r4er~t
to:'i~oute 360. In conj~eti°n with.develOPment (e~nVe~exiee .~store) on the. ~tdJ~teerit
parcel to'the east,' two (~2)':directaeeesses we;e provided :tO:Rodte 36.0. ~e apPliea~it has
Proffered 'to limit direct .aceesSfroTM the proper~r to RoUte.360ito~ one(l!) pUblie- road; -the
"Public Road" (proffered .. condifi°n 4). Constmcfionofthe (Public Road will.result in'
approximately 100 feet Of sep~ation between .the Public. l~ad:.and: the convenience-
Store's westernmost access.. Access spacing along major .ar~efifls such 'as' Route 360'
Should be approximatelY 500 feet.
The traftie impact of this development must :be addressed. The'. applicant has proffered
to: 1) construct additionalpavex~nt along Route .360: at the:P~blie ROad interleetion to'
provide a right turn lane; 2)e°nstmet two (2)lanes of~Hampt°n Park Drive EXtended
through the property; 3).eonstmetthe Public:Road-as :a:three(3) lane'~ieal sectiOn at its
intersection with Route' 360; and4) construct an additi0~ lane ofpavement along :Route
360 ~Om the Public Road toi~the eastern property line of theadjaeent pared (Tax .ID 708,
667-8988); 5) construct an access road f~on~ th~ eubnc-ROad ti the.afijaeent':eonvenienee
store property; and6)Close,the existing crossover-on RoUte 356Oloe ted just east of the
site, and construct a new crossover, including left mm tanesal0ngboth:the eastbound and
wedtbound ~anes, at the-~pubnc Road interseefion~ '(Note(' the eX~sting Route '360
8 04SN0133-JAN28-BO8'.
crossover currently serves the Convenience store on the south side of Route 360 and
undeveloped commercially zoned property on the north side of Route 360). If the
Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) does not approve the closing of the
existing' crossover and constructing the new crossover, the developer will be relieved of
these requirements and will then be required to provide adequate left-turn lanes at'the
existing crossover on ROute 360located just east of the .property; . (Proffered Condition 7)
The developer may need to acquire ,off-site" fight of way to provide the' right turn lane
along Route 360 at the Public Road intersection. According to Proffered Condition 7, if
the developer is unable to acquire the right of way for this improvement, the developer
may request the County to acquire the right.of way as a public road improvement. All
costs associated with the acquisition will be borne by the developer.. If the County
chooses not to assist with the fight of way acquisition, the developer will'not be obligated
to acquire the "off-site" fight .of way, and will only be.Obligated to construct road
improvements within available-fight of way.
Area roads need to be improved to address safety and accommodate the increase in traffic
generated by this development. The 2001 traffic volumes along the section of Route 360
from Otterdale Road to-Route 28-8 range from 15,000 to- 61,000-vehi¢les~per day. The'
volume of traffic from Woodlake.Village Parkway to Route 288 exceeds the capacity.of
the road, and drivers experience extreme congestion,, especially: during pe.ak periods;: The
Virginia Department of Transportation's Six-Year Improvement Program includes a
project to widen Route 360to six. (6) and eight (8) laneS?f~om Swift Creek~to Winterpock
Road, The Plan designates previous funds forconstruction of additional westbound lanes
on Route 360, and provides supplemental funding for the remainder of the'project inthe
fifth (FY08) and sixth (FY09) years of the Plan. No additionalmad improvement projects
in this area of the County are included in.the Six-Year:Improvement Plan. The applicant
has proffered to contribute cash, in an amount consistent with~the"BOard of Supervisors'
Policy, toWards mitigating the traffic impact of this development. (Proffered COnch'tiOn 2)
As previously stated, the proposed access to Route 360 is not acceptable; therefOre~ the-
Transportation Department cannot support this request:
9 04SN0133-JAN28-BOS
Financial Impact on Capital Facilities:
· e :Rtnvrr
Potential Number °fNew Dwelling Units 55*
Population Increase 149.60
2.72.
Number of New Students
Elementary 13.20 .. :0.24
Middle ' 7.15 0.13
High 9.35 0.17
TOTAL' 29.70 - 0.54
Net Cost for Schools - 266,585 4,847
Net Cost for Parks 38,115 693
Net Cost for: Libraries 20,625
Net Cost for Fire Stations ' ',.,. ,,,,J ' '-~.
~'~,n~ · ~n~.
Average Net' Cost for Roads 225,995 ' 4,1:09
*Based on a proffered maximum number of lots. Actual number Of l°ts and .corresponding
impact may vary. (Proffered Condition 13)
As noted, this proposed development Will have an impact on 'capital facilities. Staff .has
calculated the fiscal impact of every new dwelling unit on schoolS;: roads, parks, libraries and fire
stations at $10,425 per unit. The. aPplicant has beenadvised ~that a maximum, proffer of $9;000
per unit would defray the cost of the capital facilities necessitated by thiS-prOposed development.
Consistent With :the Board of SupervisOrs' Policy, and~proffers accepted from other apPlicants,
the applicant has offered cash to assist-in defraying the cost of this~proposed zoning on such
capital facilities. (Proffered Condition 2)
Note that circumstances relevant to this case, as presented by the applicant, have been reviewed
and it has been determined that itis appropriate to accept the maximum cash proffer in this case.
LAND USE
Comprehensive Plan:
Lies Within the boundaries of the Upper SWift Creek. Plan which suggests the .northern
portion of the property, north of the future Hampton Park Drive EXtended, is appropriate
for office and residential development of up to ten (10)'units per acre, while the southern
10 04SN0133-JAN28-BOS
portion of the property, south of the proposed Hampton Park' Drive Extended, is
appropriate for single family residential development of two (2) units per aero or lesS.
Area Development Trends:
Properties to the north are zoned Neighborhood Business (C-2), Community Business(C-
3) and General Business (C-5) and are occupied by a single family dwelling.or are
currently vacant. Properties to .the south and west are-zoned: Agricultural (A) and:are
developed for single family uses-.or are currently vacant. Properties .to.the eastarezoned
Agricultural (A) or Residential(R-9) and are Currently vacant or pending subdivision.plan
approval as part of the Hampton Park Subdivision development.. It ;is antiCipated-that:-
residential, zoning and land use patterns will eontinuesoUtho, f:the 'future Hampton Park
Drive Extended consistent with densities suggested by the Planl.
Density:
A maximum of fifty-five (55)lots on the property, yielding a densi~ ofapproximately 1~.9
units per~aere, has been proffered, (Proffered Condition'13~:i .
Dwelling. Size and Architectural Treatment:
Proffered' conditions address minimum house siZe and foundafion::.and exposed ;pier
. treatment. (Proffered ConditiOns 11 and 12) ': '
Limitations~on Parcel Division:
As previously noted, with: approval of this request, ~proPe~' no~' of the: proposed
HamPton.Park Drive 'Extended collector will remS(zOned ~grie~tural (A). ~tha
Conciiti°nal Use Planned. Devel°Pmem to pemaltthe. a:of,the Public ~°adand
Hampton Park Drive EXtender's.to Serve the proposed :re deVeloPment :: to the
sou~. With the extension iof these. rights'of way lhroU~!ithe subject pr0pe~, :. the
potential. exists for the property-north of HamptOn park:. Dh'vel. Extended~. as .w~ll:?.~S anY
residual AgriculturallY-~.oi~ed prOperty that"may: be,' locatedi s~uth .Of. the' establishe~. '
ali~ment of this road,to be divided into parcels for :resiCl~nfial; deVelopmem that: are
exempt ~ffom.the subdivision review procesS. To addresSis~Concems relati% to 'the
creati°n of individual parCelS outside of the subdivisi°n :pro%sS whieh have aeeess to
these prOPosed roads,,: i'roffered ConditiOn 9 precludeS:the- bdi si°n of bOth prope
north ;f,Hampton Park Drive EXtended as well ;as any o'f-:-~e Subjeot Agfieul~ai (,~)
property except for the establishment of these rights of Way..-FUrther~ no residential
building permits would be isSUed on such propexties.
CONCLUSIONS
Although the 'Upper Swift Creek Plan suggests that the northern portion of the propextY,, north- of
the future Hampton Park DriVe Extended, is appropriate for-office!and, residenfialdeveloPment of
11 1048N01'334AN28-BOS
up to ten (! 0) units per acre, while the southern portion of the property, south of the proposed
Hampton Park Drive Extended, is appropriate for single family residential development of two
(2) units per acre or less, the request fails to.address Transportation concerns. Specifically, 'due to
the existing accesses along this section of Route 360 and the.limited Route 360 frontage of the
subject, property, direct access should not be provided from the subject, property to Route- 360.
As.proposed, construction of the Public Road will result in approximatelY. 100 feet of separation
between the Public Road and the Westernmost access of the adjacent commercially, develOped
property to the west, whereas such spacing along major arterials should be approximately 500
feet.
Given these .c0nsiderations, denial of this request is recommended.
CASE HISTORY
Planning Commission Meeting (11/18/03):
At the request of the applicant, the Commission .deferred this ease. to their December 16,
2003, public hearing.
Staff (1.1/19/03):
The applicant was advised in writing that any significant new or revised information
should, be submitted no later than November 24; 2003, -for conSideration~at: the
Commission's December public :hearing. Also, the applicant was advised that a$50~0;00
deferral 'fee must be paid prior to the Commission's public heating,
Staff(Il/26/03):
To 'date, no new information has been submitted nor-has thei$500.00: deferral fee been
paid.
ApPlicant (12/2/03):
The deferral fee was paid.
Applicant (12/15/03 and 12/16/03):
Revised proffered conditions were .submitted to address construction of turn lanes .and.
access to property to the east.
12 04SN0133-JAN28"Bos
Planning Commission Meeting (12/16/03):
'The-applicant did not accept stows recommendation,but accepted the .CommisSion, s
recommendation. There was:opposition, present. Concerns Were.expressed relative tothe
relocation of the crossover on'Route 360 and its affect-On_: access ~for existing and
proposed area businesses.
In response to questions of'Messrs. Stack and Cunningham, Mr. MeCraeken indicated
that crossovers must serve 'more than a single parcel and:~ that 'the Transportation
Department could not support.this request without the closure of the existing crossover,
Mr. Stack noted that .with future growth along the westem~ Route 360 cOrridor, the
crossover'would eventually be' clOSed, that proffered condifions~Provide for an alternative.
access to the adjacent eastern commercial development thrOugh the SubjeCt prope~;.and
that this will result in the adjacent commercial development ha~g.'.two {2) accesseS.
On motion of Mr. Stack, seconded by Mr. Cunningham, the Commigsion recommended'
approval of this request and acceptance of the proffered condifi6ns on pages2 through 4.
AYES: Unanimous. '
The Board of.Supervisors, On Wednesday, January 28, 2004, berg at 7:00 p,m., will, take
under consideration this request,
13
04SN0133 -JAN2:8-Bos'