Loading...
04SN0142-Jan 28.pdfJanuary 28, 2004 BS STAFF'S V QUEST ALYsIs RECOMMENDATION 04SN0142 Huguenot Robious Associates, LC Midlothian Magisterial: District South line of:the Norfolk Southern Railroad REQUEST: Amendmem to Conditional Use Planned Developmem (Case 018N0255) relative to landscaping. Specifically,.the applicant wishes to mOdify. Proffered Condition 12 of Case 01 SN0255 relative to additiOnal landscaping :reqUirements. PROPOSEDLANDUSE: Expansion of a m~-warehouse facility is planned. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION RECOMMEND APPROVAL-SUBJECT TO THE CONDITION ON PAGE 2. STAFF RECOMMENDATION The original conditions of zoning Were negotiated with area propertY owners. After consideration of public input,-should the CommisSion.and Board wish to approve this amendment, imposition of the Condition would be appropriate. (NOTE:'. CONDITIONS MAY BE IMPOSED OR THE PROPERTY OWNER:MAy PROFFER CONDITIONS. THE CONDITIONSNOTED WITH "STAFF/CPC":WERE AGREED UPONBY BOTH STAFF AND THE coMMIssION. CONDITIONS WITH-iONLY A "STAFF" ARE. RECOMMENDED SOLELY BY STAFF. CONDITIONS WITH .ONLY A "CPC" 'ARE ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS RECOMMENDED BY THE PLUG: COMMISSION,) Providing a FIRST CHOICE Community Through Excellence in'Public Service. CONDITION (CPC/STAFF) Additional Landscaping. Within the required setback for the rear boundary adjacent to Chesterfield County Tax IDs 741-714,8181~, 742-7'15,5206; 742-715-5956, 742-715-6245 and 742-715-6432,;the Developer will provide Perimeter landscaping B (option 1I). (P) (Note: This condition supersedes Condition 12 of Case 01 SN0255.) GENERAL INFORMATION Location: South line of the Norfolk Southern Railroad right of way, west of Cranbeck Road. TaxID 741-715-Part of 9831 (Sheet 2). Existing Zoning: A with Conditional Use and Conditional Use Planned Development Size: 1.9 acres Existing Land Use: Vacant Adiacent Zoning and Land Use: North South EaSt West -R-40, A and 0,2 with-Conditional Use Planned Development; Norfolk Southern Railroad right of .way, Bellgrade (a mixed use development) and public/semi- public (church) - R-MF; Vacant - R-MF; Single familY residential or vacant - 0-2 with Conditional USe and Conditional Use PlarmedDevelopment; Industrial (mini-warehouse facility) UTILITIES; ENVIRONMENTAL; AND PUBLIC FACILITIES This proposedamendment will have no impact on these facilities. 2 04SN0142-/AN28-BOS LAND USE Comprehensive Plan: Lies within the boundaries ofthe Northern Area Land Use and Transportation Plan which suggests the pr°Perty is appropriate for office use. Area Development Trends: Adjacent properties to the north are zoned Residential (R-40), Agricultural (A) and Corporate Office' (0-2) and are occupied by the Norfolk Southern Railroadand Huguenot Road rights of way, the Bellgrade development and a church. Adjacent properties to the south and east are. zoned R-MF and are occupied bY a church use or remain vacant; Multi-family residential development is currently under construction on property-tothe east, transitioning to single- family residential land uses east of Cranbeck Road. An existing mini-warehouse facility is located on adjacent property to the west. Zoning Historg: On May 24, 1978, the Board of Supervisors, upon a favorable recommendation from the Planning Commission, approved a ConditionalUse (Case 788046), for an antique shop in an Agricultural (A) District. Approval of Case 78S046 was granted for a limited time period and has s'mce expired. On February 24, 1999, the' Board of Supervisors, upon a favorable recommendation fxom the Planning Commission, approved rezoning from Agricultural(A) to Corporate Office (O-2) with Conditional Use to permit mini-warehouse use and with, Conditional Use Planned Development to permit two (2) dwelling units for the owner/°Perator of the business.and a setback exception. (Case 99SN0183) On August 22, 2001, the Board of Supervisors, upon a favorable recommendation from the Planning Commission, approved rezoning from Corporate Office (O-2) to Agricultural (A) with Conditional Use and Conditional Use Planned Development-to permit mini- storage/mini-warehouse facility, outside storage of boats,- motor vehicles and recreational vehicles and exception to Ordinance requirements. (Case 01SN0255) Current Proposal: Through the original zoning (Case 01 SN0255),-the applicant addressed concerns of adjacent property owners' relative to minimizing the view of the proposed-mini-storage warehouse facility from their properties through Proffered Condition 12-which required additional landscaping along the rear property line. 3 04SN0142-JAN28-BOS The developer is proposing to amend Proffered Condition 12 to provide~for.landscaping in accordance with the current Ordinance rather than requiting!-specific plant materials. Specifically, Proffered Condition 12 readS as follows: 12. Additional'Landscaping. Within the required setbackfor~therearboundary adjacent' to Chesterfield CoUnty lax. ID 742-715-7541, 742'-71!5~7658,and742~715~6929'i the DeVeloper will provide Perimeterlandscaping B :(Option I); however, planting-of leyland cypresses along sUCh rear boundary adjacent to Chesterfield CoUnty Tax iD 742-715-7541, 742-715-7658 and 742-715-6929;such:p!antlngsm be staggered no farther apart than'ten (1~0) feet On center:and to bea:mini~num of slx (6) fee~ (n height at the time of planting; Further, as part of any requiredlandscaping on ithe southern property line, white pines shall be planted along thesouthem boUndary and shall be staggered no farther apart than ten (10)~feet on center:and be a.~umoften(10) to twelve (12) feet in height at the time of~planting~ ~) :. ~ The amended proffer will accomplish the intent of the original eOndi~on._Since the :approval of the original case, adjacent property has been rezoned;toallo;W multi-family residential. development. At the time of the original zoning, the adjacent properties?Were occuPied by single family residential uses. CONCLUSIONS . . The original conditions of zoning were negotiated with area property owners~ After consideration of public input, sh°uld the CommiSsion.and~Board wish to approve~s~amendment~ imposition-of the Condition.would be appropriate. Theamended proffer will aceompli~ll the intent of the original landscaping requirements. CASE HISTORY Planning Commission Meeting (I2/16/03): The applicant accepted the recommendation. There was no opPoSition present. On motion of Mr. Gecker, seconded by Mr. Stack, the CommisSionrecommended approval of this request subject to the Condition on page 2. AYES: Unanimous. The Board of Supervisors, on WednesdaY, January 28, 2004, berg!at 7-~,00 p:.m,, will-take Under consideration this request. 4 04SN0142-JAN28,BOS