01-28-2004 PacketCHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Page I of I
Meeting Date: January 28, 2004
Item Number: 2.A.
Subject:
County Administrator's Comments
County Administrator's Comments:
County Administrator:
Board Action Requested:
Summary of Information:
The Government Finance Officers Association of the United States and Canada
(GFOA), a national organization, each year recognizes budgets which meet
certain rigorous standards. The GFOA has awarded Chesterfield the
Distinguished Budget Presentation Award for the fiscal year beginning July
1, 2003. This is the 20th consecutive year that Chesterfield has won this
award. This is the highest form of recognition in governmental budgeting.
In order to receive the award a government must produce a document that
meets certain criteria as a policy document, as an operation guide, as a
financial plan, and as a communications device.
Staff appreciates the support and leadership of the Board and will continue
to improve the quality and effectiveness of the County's financial plan.
Preparer: RebeccaT. Dickson
Title: Director, Budget and Manaqement
Attachments:
['~ Yes
No
000002
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Page I of I
Meetin~l Date:
Subject:
January 28, 2004
Item Number: 5.A.
Resolution Recognizing Frank Darpli, Ph.D., Mental Health/Mental
Retardation/Substance Abuse Department, Upon His Retirement
County Administrator's Comments:
County Administrator:
Board Action Requested:
Adoption of the attached resolution.
Summary of Information:
The Board is requested to adopt a Resolution recognizing Frank Darpli, Ph.D.,
on the occasion of his retirement following 30 years of service as a
dedicated public mental health professional.
Preparer: Georqe E. Braunstein
Attachments:
Yes ~ No
Title: Executive Director
MH/MR/SA Department
# 000003
RECOGNIZING DR. FRANK DARPLI UPON HIS RETIREMENT
WHEREAS, Dr. Frank Darpli will retire on February 1, 2004 after
providing 30 years of dedicated and faithful service to Chesterfield
County; and
WHEREAS, Dr. Darpli began his career with the Chesterfield County
Department of Mental Health, Mental Retardation, and Substance Abuse in
January 1974 as Director of Adult Services; and
WHEREAS, Dr. Darpli performed admirably in various leadership
positions, including Mental Health Program Evaluator, Director of
Information Systems, and Manager of Psychiatric Rehabilitation Services;
and
WHEREAS, Dr. Darpli pioneered the development of community-based
mental health and substance abuse services in Chesterfield County and
innovative programs such as a novel Intensive Supported Residential
Service which successfully reduced state hospital utilization; and
WHEREAS, Dr. Darpli developed and successfully implemented the
department's first automated Management Information System, the
foundations of which are still being used to date; and
WHEREAS, Dr. Darpli provided outstanding leadership to help create a
comprehensive, fully integrated Psychiatric Rehabilitation Services
System for adults with serious mental illness; and
WHEREAS, Dr. Darpli served as the founding President of the
nationwide CMHC Systems User's Group, leading efforts to develop state-
of-the-art software for the Mental Health, Mental Retardation, and
Substance Abuse field; and
WHEREAS, Dr. Darpli will be sorely missed for his professional
contributions as a champion for the rights and dignity and service needs
of adults with severe mental illness and for his commitment to high
quality mental health, mental retardation, and substance abuse services
to our citizens.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Chesterfield County Board of
Supervisors, this 28tn day of January 2004, publicly recognizes the
contributions of Dr. Frank Darpli, extends appreciation for his 30 years
of dedicated service to the county, and offers congratulations and best
wishes for a long and happy retirement.
AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that a copy of this resolution be
presented to Dr. Darpli, and that this resolution be permanently recorded
among the papers of this Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County,
Virginia.
OOOO04
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Page I of I
Meetin~ Date: January28, 2004 Item Number: 5.B.
Subiect: Resolution Recognizing Master Officer Roberto J. Lopez Upon His
Retirement
County Administrator's Comments:
County Administrator:
Board Action Requested:
The adoption of the attached resolution.
Summary of Information'
Master Police Officer Roberto J. Lopez will retire from the Police Department
after having provided over 25 years of service to the citizens of
Chesterfield County.
Preparer: Lt. Colonel Dennis G. McDonald
Title:
Deputy Chief of Police
Attachments:
Ycs
[-~No
60ooo5
RECOGNIZING MASTER OFFICER ROBERTO J. LOPEZ UPON HIS RETIREMENT
WHEREAS, Master Police Officer Roberto J. Lopez will retire from the
Chesterfield County Police Department on February 1, 2004, after providing 25
years of quality service to the citizens of Chesterfield County; and
WHEREAS, Officer Lopez has faithfully served the county in the capacity of
Patrol Officer, Investigator, Senior Police Officer and Master Police Officer;
and
WHEREAS, Officer Lopez is a 1998 graduate of Chesterfield County's TQI
University; and
WHEREAS, Officer Lopez served as a member of the Police Quality Council
from 1998 through 2000; and
WHEREAS, Officer Lopez has assisted the Department of Motor Vehicles in an
undercover capacity in two separate incidents, which resulted in arrest and
criminal convictions; and
WHEREAS, Officer Lopez has served the department as a valuable resource as
a Spanish translator in literally hundreds of incidents throughout the county;
and
WHEREAS, Officer Lopez served the Hispanic Committee by participation in
the Hispanic Heritage Month celebration; and
WHEREAS, Officer Lopez has received numerous letters of thanks and
appreciation for service rendered from the citizens of Chesterfield County; and
WHEREAS, Officer Lopez has provided the Chesterfield County Police
Department with many years of loyal and dedicated service; and
WHEREAS, Chesterfield County and the Board of Supervisors will miss Officer
Lopez's diligent service.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Chesterfield County Board of
Supervisors, this 28th day of January 2004, publicly recognizes Master Police
Officer Roberto J. Lopez, and extends on behalf of its members and the citizens
of Chesterfield County, appreciation for his service to the county,
congratulations upon his retirement, and best wishes for a long and happy
retirement.
AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that a copy of this resolution be presented to
Officer Lopez, and that this resolution be permanently recorded among the papers
of this Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County.
000006
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Page I of I
Meeting Date: January 28, 2004
Item Number: 5.C.
Subject:
Recognizing Vincent Keith Fisher, Route Collection Crew Member and Heavy
Equipment Operator, Waste and Resource Recovery Division, Upon His
Retirement for Over 27 Years of Dedicated Service to the County
County Administrator's Comments:
County Administrator:
Board Action Requested: Adoption of attached resolution.
Summary of Information:
Staff requests the Board adopt the attached resolution recognizing Vincent
Keith Fisher for over 27 years of service to Chesterfield County.
Preparer: Francis M. Pitaro
Title: Director of General Services
Attachments:
[-'-~ Yes
No
RECOGNIZING MR. VINCENT KEITH FISHER UPON HIS RETIREMENT
WHEREAS, Mr. Vincent Keith Fisher joined the county on August 3, 1976 in
what was then called the county Sanitation Division; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Fisher provided exemplary service to the customers on his
route throughout his 27 years of service; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Fisher has furthered the county's recycling efforts by
collecting tons of used paper from the various county facilities and schools;
and
WHEREAS, Mr. Fisher has worked during adverse weather conditions to plow
roads and clear walkways for citizens and employees; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Fisher has served as a member of the Employee Advisory
Committee for the General Services Department; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Fisher has frequently volunteered to help with various
neighborhood clean-up efforts and has always been willing to do whatever was
required to make the county a better community; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Fisher was always a team player and could be counted on to
do more than his fair share; and
WHEREAS, the Waste and Resource Recovery Division enjoys a high degree
of customer satisfaction due to the customer service efforts of Mr. Fisher.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Chesterfield County Board of
Supervisors, this 28tn day of January 2004, publicly recognizes Mr. Vincent
Keith Fisher; expresses sincere gratitude and appreciation for his years of
service to the citizens of the county and his dedication to excellent
customer service; and extends congratulations on his retirement and best
wishes for a long and happy retirement.
AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that a copy of this resolution be presented
to Mr. Fisher and that this resolution be permanently recorded among the
papers of the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County, Virginia.
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Page I of 2
Meetin~l Date:
Subiect:
January 28, 2004
Item Number: 6.
Work Session on the Proposed FY2005 - 2010 Capital Improvement Program
County Administrator's Comments:
County Administrator:
Board Action Requested:
Hold a work session on the Proposed FY2005 - 2010 Capital Improvement
Program.
Summary of Information:
A work session on the proposed Capital Improvement Program (CIP) has been
scheduled for this date. The proposed CIP encompasses a six-year period,
FY2005-2010. The Program advances priorities established in recent years,
and identifies projects that are proposed to be placed on a referendum in the
Fall of 2004.
The six-year plan proposes expenditures of over $569 million.
the CIP is as follows:
A breakdown of
General County Projects
School Projects
Utility Projects
$201,653,700
224,407,600
143,297,000
Total
$569,358,300
Preparer: Rebecca T. Dickson
Title: ._..Director, Budget & Management
Attachments:
Ycs
-~No
00007 [
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Page 2 of 2
The Proposed CIP, including revenues and specific expenditures will be
reviewed at the work session.
The School Board is currently developing the FY2005-2010 School Capital
Improvement Program with anticipated adoption in late February. As such,
details regarding the School CIP will be presented to the Board of
Supervisors at a later date.
Details of the Utilities Department CIP will be summarized during the
review of the Utilities Department operating budget at a future Board
meeting.
In accordance with the County Charter, the CIP must be adopted by May 1't.
000005
O0000D
·
mind
·
·
O000lO
O000l.:l.
0000~.;~
0000~.4
0000~$
000016
000017
0000~.8
000019
000020
O000:Z~.
O000Z~
0000;~4
o0oo~$
000026
O00097
00002S
000029
000030
ooOoaa.
000032
ooooaa
0000~4
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Page I of 3
Meetin~l Date: January 28, 2004 Item Number: 8.A.
Subiect: Streetlight Installation Cost Approvals
County Administrator's Comments:
County Administrator:
Board Action RequestS.'
This item requests Board approval of new streetlight installations in the
Bermuda and Clover Hill Districts.
Summary of Information-
Streetlight requests from individual citizens or civic groups are received in
the Department of Environmental Engineering. Staff requests cost quotations
from Dominion Virginia Power for each request received. When the quotations
are received, staff re-examines each request and presents them at the next
available regular meeting of the Board of Supervisors for consideration.
Staff provides the Board with an evaluation of each request based on the
following criteria:
1. Streetlights should be located at intersections;
o
There should be a minimum average of 600 vehicles per day (VPD)
passing the requested location if it is an intersection, or 400 VPD
if the requested location is not an intersection;
Preparer: Richard M. McElfish
Attachments:
Yes
CONTINUED N~X? PAGE
Title: Director, Environmental Engineering
No
000035
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Page 2 of 3
Summary of Information: (Continued)
o
Petitions are required and should include 75% of residents within
200 feet of the requested location and if at an intersection, a
majority of those residents immediately adjacent to the
intersection.
Cost quotations from Dominion Virginia Power are valid for a period of 60
days. The Board, upon presentation of the cost quotation may approve, defer,
or deny the expenditure of funds from available District Improvement Funds
for the streetlight installation. If the expenditure is approved, staff
authorizes Dominion Virginia Power to install the streetlight. A denial of a
project will result in its cancellation and the District Improvement Fund
will be charged the design cost shown; staff will notify the requestor of the
denial. Projects cannot be deferred for more than 30 days due to quotation
expiration. Quotation expiration has the same effect as a denial.
BERMUDA DISTRICTs
In the Villas at Rivers Bend Subdivision:
Villas Drive vicinity of 12330
Cost to install streetlight: $901.10
(Design Costs $149.83)
Does not meet minimumcriteri& for intersection or vehicles per day
At the intersection of Centralia Road and Patromdale Drive, upgrade
the existing lamp to standard 8000 Lumen Enclosed Fixture
Cost to install streetlight: $360.71
(Design Costs $139.40)
Meets minimum criteri&
CLOVER HILL DISTRICTs
· In the Surreywood Subdivision
At the intersection of Surreywood Drive and Surreywood Court
Cost to install streetlight: $4,398.66
(Design Costs $92.93)
Meets minimum criteri&
At the intersection of Lancashire Drive and Lancashire Court
Cost to install streetlight: $6,374.06
(Design Costs $92.93)
Meets minimum criteri&
CO~'rm, sD ~x? ~,xe~. 0000.36
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Page 3 of 3
Summary of Information: (Continued)
For information regarding available balances in the District Improvement
Fund accounts, please reference the District Improvement Fund Report.
000037
STREETLIGHT REQUEST
Bermuda District
Request Received: April 28, 2003 Estimate Requested: April 29, 2003
Estimate Received: November 13, 2003 Days Estimate Outstanding: 198
NAME OF REQUESTOR: Mrs. Julie D. Donald
ADDRESS: 12412 Villas Drive
Chester, VA 23836
REQUESTED LOCATION:
Villas Drive, in the vicinity of 12330
Cost to install streetlight: $901.10
POLICY CRITERIA:
Intersection:
Vehicles Per Day:
Petition:
Requestor or Staff Comments:
Requestor states: "A light is needed for safety.
feel safe due to darkness on Villas Drive."
Not Qualified, location is not an intersection
Not Qualified, less than 400 Vehicles per Day
Qualified
We have a lot of people who do not
000038
Street Light Request Map
January 28, 2004
This map is a copyrighted product of
the Chesterfield County GIS Office.
Street Light Legend
~ existing light
· requested light
N
This map shows citizen requested
streetlight installations in relation
to existing streetlights.
Existing streetlight information was
obtained from the Chesterfield County
Environmental Engineering Department.
710
355
710 Feet
00003~
STREETLIGHT UPGRADE REQUEST
Bermuda District
Request Received: July 30, 2003
Estimate Received: November 25, 2003
NAME OF REQUESTOR: Ms. Anita Hill
Estimate Requested: July 30, 2003
Days Estimate Outstanding: 118
ADDRESS:
9800 Centralia Road
Richmond, VA 23237
REQUESTED LOCATION:
Intersection of Centralia Road and Patromdale Drive
Cost to upgrade streetlight: $360.71
POLICY CRITERIA:
Intersection:
Vehicles Per Day:
Petition:
Requestor or Staff Comments:
None
Qualified
Qualified
Not Required, existing streetlight
00004O
Street Light Request Map
January 28, 2004
CENTRALIA RD '~-~'/~ ~3
This map is a copyrighted product of
the Chesterfield County GIS Office.
Street Light Legend
~ existing light
· requested light
N
This map shows citizen requested
streetlight installations in relation
to existing streetlights.
Existing streetlight information was
obtained from the Chesterfield County
Environmental Engineering Department.
180
90
180 Feet
00004~.
STREETLIGHT REQUEST
Clover Hill District
Request Received: August 28, 2003
Estimate Requested: August 28, 2003
Estimate Received: December 17, 2003 Days Estimate Outstanding: 111
NAME OF REQUESTOR:
ADDRESS:
Mr. Paul Grasewicz
Representing the Surreywood Homeowners Association
2212 Lake Surry Drive
Richmond, Virginia 23235
REQUESTED LOCATION:
Intersection of Surreywood Drive and Surreywood Court
Cost to install streetlight: $4,398.66
POLICY CRITERIA:
Intersection:
Vehicles Per Day:
Petition:
Qualified
Qualified
Qualified
Requestor or Staff Comments:
Requestor notes that this location is a school bus stop.
00004;
STREETLIGHT REQUEST
Clover Hill District
Request Received: August 28, 2003
Estimate Requested: August 28, 2003
Estimate Received: December 17, 2003 Days Estimate Outstanding: 111
NAME OF REQUESTOR:
ADDRESS:
Mr. Paul Grasewicz
Representing the Surreywood Homeowners Association
2212 Lake Surry Drive
Richmond, Virginia 23235
REQUESTED LOCATION:
Intersection of Lancashire Drive and Lancashire Court
Cost to install streetlight: $6,374.06
POLICY CRITERIA:
Intersection:
Vehicles Per Day:
Petition:
Qualified
Qualified
Qualified
Requestor or Staff Comments:
None
000043
Street Light Request Map
January 28, 2004
This map is a copyrighted product of
the Chesterfield County GIS Office.
Street Light Legend
~ existing light
· requested light
N
This map shows citizen requested
streetlight installations in relation
to existing streetlights.
Existing streetlight information was
obtained from the Chesterfield County
Environmental Engineering Department.
220
110
220 Feet
000044
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Page I of I
Meeting Date: January 28, 2004
Item Number: 8.B.1.
Subject:
Nomination of Appointment to the Towing Advisory Board
County Administrator's Comments:
County Administrator:
Board Action Requested:
Nominate/Appoint members to serve on the Towing Advisory Board
Summary of Information:
The members of the Towing Advisory Board serve at the pleasure of the Board
and have no set term limits. This is in accordance with the Code of Virginia
§46.2-1217 adopted as County Ordinance, 1997, the (towing) advisory board
shall include representatives of local law enforcement, towing and recovery
operators, and the general public.
Colonel Baker has recommended that the Board nominate and appoint the
individuals listed on the attachment to fill the vacancies on the Towinq
Advisory Board. They meet all eligibility requirements to fill the vacancy
and have indicated their willingness to serve.
Under the existing Rules of Procedure, appointments to boards and committees
are nominated at one meeting and appointed at the subsequent meeting unless
the Rules of Procedures are suspended by a unanimous vote of the Board
members present. Nominees are voted on in the order in which they are
nominated.
Preparer: Carl R. Baker
Title: Chief of Police
Attachments:
Yes ~ No
000045
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
The Honorable Members of the Board of Supervisors
Lane B. Ramsey
January 14, 2004
Nomination/Appointments to the Towing Advisory Board
Staff requests that the following persons be nominated/appointed by the Board of Supervisors to serve on the
Towing Advisory Board.
Mr. Ray Cullop - Ray's Towing
Mr. Fred Key - Keys' Towing
Mr. Ronnie Waters - Ronnie's Wrecker
Mr. Doug Conner - Conner Brothers Body Shops
Sgt. David Deringer - Police, Support Services Division
Officer Howard Barnes - Special Police
If you would like additional information, please contact Colonel Carl Baker at (804) 748-1266.
O00CC
Providing a FIRST CHOICE community through excellence in public service.
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Page I of 2
Meetin~l Date:
January 28, 2004
Item Number: 8.B.2.
Subiect:
Nomination and Appointment of a County Representative to the Richmond
Regional Planning District Commission
County Administrator's Comments:
County Administrator:
Board Action Requested:
Nominate and appointment of County representative to the Richmond
Regional Planning District Commission.
Summary of Information:
The Richmond Regional Planning District Commission consists of 31
representatives. Chesterfield County is represented on the Commission
by four elected officials, one Planning Commissioner, and one citizen.
At their January 20, 2004, meeting the Chesterfield Planning Commission
recommended that the Board of Supervisors appoint Sherman Litton to be a
representative from Chesterfield County to the Richmond Regional
Planning District Commission.
Under the existing Rule of Procedure, appointments are nominated at one
meeting and appointed at the subsequent meeting unless the Rules of
Procedure are suspended by a unanimous vote of the Board members
present.
Preparer:
Thomas E. Jacobson
Title: Director of Planning
C:DATNAGENDN2004/JAN28/1/GOK
Attachments:
-~ Yes
No
#000047
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Page I of I
Meetin~l Date:
January 28, 2004
Item Number: 8.B.3.
Subject:
Nomination and Appointments for the Bermuda District
County Administrator's Comments:
County Administrator,~
Board Action Requested:
Nominate and appointment County representatives
District.
Summary of Information:
for the Bermuda
Under the existing Rules of Procedure, appointments are nominated at one
meeting and appointed at the subsequent meeting unless the Rules of
Procedure are suspended by a unanimous vote of the Board members
present.
Preparer: Lisa Elko
Title: Clerk to the Board
Attachments:
]Yes
No
~)00045
Bermuda District Appointments
COMMITTEE ON THE FUTURE
Mr. Jim Morris - Bermuda District
PARKS AND RECREATION ADVISORY COMMISSION
Mr. Tim Mick - Bermuda District
Mr. Jack Griffin - Bermuda District
DISABILITY SERVICES BOARD
Rev. Clarence Martin - Bermuda District
Rev. Charles Clubb - Bermuda District
COMMUNITY SERVICES BOARD
Ms. Shirley M. Cole - Bermuda District
SOLID WASTE ADVISORY BOARD
Mr. Mike Williams - Bermuda District
000049
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Page I of I
Meetin~l Date: January 28, 2004
Item Number: 8.C.l.a.
Subiect:
Resolution Recognizing Clover Hill Baptist Church for 35 Years of Ministry
and the Faithful Service of Pastor Reverend Calvin Eaves
County Administrator's Comments:
County Administrator:~
Board Action Requested:
Mr. Warren requested that the following resolution be adopted.
Summary of Information:
This resolution recognizes Clover Hill Baptist Church for 35 Years of
Ministry and Reverend Calvin Eaves for his faithful dedication as Pastor of
the Church.
Preparer: Donald J. Kappel
Title: Director, Public Affairs
Attachments:
Ycs
-~No
ooooso
RECOGNIZING REVEREND CALVIN T. EAVES, SR.
AND THE CLOVER HILL BAPTIST CHURCH
WHEREAS, plans for the formation of a new, Independent Baptist
congregation took shape in September 1968 when a group of faithful people
met at a building that formerly housed a cabinet shop, near the entrance
to what is now the Brandermill community; and
WHEREAS, on November 24, 1968, Calvin T. Eaves, Sr. became the
pastor of the new church; and
WHEREAS, on Sunday, February 9, 1969, church officers were elected,
a constitution was adopted and charter members signed the register; and
WHEREAS, the church voted to purchase a 10-acre tract of land on
Courthouse Road; and
WHEREAS, in April 1971, the permanent name of Clover Hill Baptist
Church was selected and building plans were adopted; and
WHEREAS, a bond program was launched and a groundbreaking ceremony
was held, leading to construction of a new building that was occupied on
March 26, 1972 and formally dedicated on Easter Sunday, April 2, 1972;
and
WHEREAS, the church continued to grow, with the addition of a two-
story educational building first occupied in the spring of 1974, and a
bus garage in 1975 to support the growing bus ministry; and
WHEREAS, the church assumed ownership of Richmond Christian School
and its properties on Newby's Bridge Road on May 12, 1976 and later moved
to the Gill School property on Belmont Road in 1983, and the school has a
current enrollment of over 500 students; and
WHEREAS, the Cloverland Day Care program was added in 1978; a
television ministry was begun in 1982; and the church purchased the Gill
School property on Belmont Road in 1983; and
WHEREAS, the church now owns more than 120 acres on three sites and
has an operating budget of approximately $3.5 million; and
WHEREAS, through all of this growth, Reverend Calvin Eaves, with the
able and committed assistance of many others in the church, guided the
church to ever expanded ministries; and
WHEREAS, Reverend Eaves has announced his intention to retire as
pastor effective February 1, 2004; and
WHEREAS, for 35 years, the church has had a significant, positive
impact on the surrounding communities, and on Chesterfield County.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Chesterfield County Board
of Supervisors, on behalf of the citizens of Chesterfield County, extends
its best wishes to the Clover Hill Baptist Church on the occasion of its
35th anniversary; offers its sincere appreciation to Reverend Calvin T.
Eaves, Sr., for his long and dedicated service; and wishes him continued
success and happiness in all his endeavors.
000051
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Page I of I
Meetin~ Date: January 28, 2004
Item Number: 8.C.1.b.
Subiect:
Resolution Recognizing Master Officer William M. Jones Upon His
Retirement
County Administrator's Comments:
County Administrator: ~
Board Action Requested:
The adoption of the attached resolution.
Summary of Information:
Master Police Officer William M. Jones will retire from the Police Department
after having provided 27 years of service to the citizens of Chesterfield
County.
Preparer: Lt. Colonel Dennis G. McDonald
Title: Deputy Chief of Police
Attachments:
-~No
# 00005;
RECOGNIZING MASTER POLICE OFFICER WILLIAM M. JONES
UPON HIS RETIREMENT
WHEREAS, Master Police Officer William M. Jones will retire from the
Chesterfield County Police Department on February 1, 2004, after providing 27
years of quality service to the citizens of Chesterfield County; and
WHEREAS, Officer Jones has faithfully served the county in the capacity
of Sheriff's Deputy, Patrol Officer, Senior Police Officer, and Master Police
Officer; and
WHEREAS, Officer Jones was instrumental in ensuring a smooth transition
and minimal disruption to operations when South District Operations moved to
the new Chester Police Station; his efforts involved working long tedious
hours beyond his normal required duties, not only working on operational
issues, but performing difficult manual labor such as erecting evidence
lockers, setting up the roll call room, work room, storage closets, etcetera;
and because of his personal drive, commitment and unselfish work ethic, the
station was quickly brought up to speed as a functional facility, capable of
providing excellent customer service; and
WHEREAS, Officer Jones also worked hard to prepare the station for the
grand opening ceremonies, which was a successful program that represented the
department well; and
WHEREAS, Officer Jones, in his assignment as a desk officer, has
rendered considerable helpful information and guidance to thousands of
Chesterfield County citizens; and
WHEREAS, Officer Jones has received numerous letters of thanks and
appreciation for assistance rendered in all types of situations; and
WHEREAS, Officer Jones has provided the Chesterfield County Police
Department with many years of loyal and dedicated service; and
WHEREAS, Chesterfield County and the Board of Supervisors will miss
Officer Jones' diligent service.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Chesterfield County Board of
Supervisors recognizes Master Police Officer William M. Jones, and extends on
behalf of its members and the citizens of Chesterfield County, appreciation
for his service to the county, congratulations upon his retirement, and best
wishes for a long and happy retirement.
000053
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Page I of
Meetin~l Date: January 28, 2004
Item Number: 8.C.2.a.
Subject:
Set a Public Hearing to Consider Conveyance of Surplus County
Property on Rivers Bend Boulevard and Authorize Family Time
Courthouse, LLC to Apply for an Amendment to an Existing
Conditional Use Planned Development (95SN0109)
County Administrator's Comments:
Coun~ Administrator: ~
//
BoardAction Requeste:~set a public hearing for February 11, 2004 at 7:00 p.m.
to consider the sale of surplus property to Family Time Courthouse, LLC;
authorize Family Time Courthouse, LLC to apply for an amendment to an
existing Conditional Use Planned Development (95SN0109); and authorize the
County Administrator to execute the contract documents.
Summary of Information:
On January 23, 2002, the Board of Supervisors declared a parcel of land
containing 2.77 acres, more or less, on Rivers Bend Boulevard, PIN:
8156531888, as surplus property and directed staff to offer the property for
sale. Family Time Courthouse, LLC, has made an offer of $200,000.00 for the
property. Family Time Courthouse, LLC proposes to purchase the property as a
site for a child care center. The existing Conditional Use Planned
Development for the property prohibits use of the site for a child care
center, therefore, purchaser wishes to apply for and obtain an amendment
allowing its intended use before it closes on the property. Because the
purchaser does not own the property the Board of Supervisors must authorize
Family Time Courthouse, LLC to apply for the amendment. The public hearing
is required to sell the property.
Approval is recommended.
District: Bermuda
Preparer: John W. Harmon
Title: Ri,qht of Way Mana.qer
Attachments:
Ycs
No
00054
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Page 2 of 2
Meeting Date: January 28, 2004
Bud.qet and Management Comments:
This item is to set a public hearing to consider the sale of surplus property
containing 2.77 acres on Rivers Bend Boulevard, PIN: 8156531888. An offer of
$200,000 has been made by Family Time Courthouse, LLC on the condition that
they apply for and obtain an amendment allowing the property to be used for a
child care center.
Proceeds from the sale of the property will be applied to the Courthouse Road
Fire and Rescue Station capital project. In the event that any of the funds
are not spent at the end of the Courthouse project, remaining funds will be
transferred to the next fire and rescue station scheduled to be built.
Preparer: Rebecca T. Dickson
Title: Director, Budget and Management
000055
' VICINITY SKETCH
Set a Public Headng to Consider Conveyance of Surplus County Property
on Rivers Bend Boulevard and Authorize Family Time Courthouse, LLC
to Apply for an Amendment to an Existing Conditional Use Planned Development
V
O
DR
SUNSET
E HUNDRED RD
N
Chesterfield County Department of Utilities
Right Of Way Office
000056
CHORD ~ ] .~ ~INC ] TAN LE'NG'IH]
37.417' · S 4~"01'87', f ~'.7,.~' I
!1
PHIUP & ROBBIE TRpMP$ON ~
D,B, 3ffl';
T.M 1!
MPN B!
·
~ ~' ~P.
P~CEL A : ~ ~m~s~e"
2.77 AC.
· ~,- N ~0'~ ." ~.7~' N
40.56'
A P~C~ OF ~O CONT~NING
' ~/~2.77 ACR~ ~ ON H~'S DR~
TO BE DEDI~TED TO
~E COU~ OF CHE~RRffLD
T~ER WI~ ~ INGRE~/EGRE~ ~S~EN1
BERMU~ DI~I~
CH~FI~D C~N~ HRGIN~
fe~t
~ ~0~' AUGU~ 13, 1997
C~L~ C, TOWN~ · ASSOC~T~, P.C,
V%Right Of Way~EASEMENTS~'-'ONTRACT~CONTRACT for PURCHASE, DEAN 8156531888,doc~RM~DRS
OOO057
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Page I of 2
Meetin~l Date:
January 28, 2004
Item Number: 8.C.2.b.
Subject:
Set Public Hearing for February 11, 2004 to Consider Adoption of an Ordinance
to Amend the Chesapeake Bay Preservation Ordinance
County Administrator's Comments:
County Administrator: ~
Board Action Requested:
The Board of Supervisors is requested to set a public hearing for February
11, 2004 to consider adoption of an ordinance to amend the Chesapeake Bay
Preservation Ordinance, which is a part of the County Zoning Ordinance.
Summary of Information:
In December of 2001, the State Regulations for the Chesapeake Bay
Preservation Act were amended and became effective in March of 2002.
Accordingly, staff has developed amendments to the Chesapeake Bay
Preservation Ordinance to incorporate the changes, which have been mandated
by the State Regulations. Staff met with representatives of the development
and environmental communities to discuss the draft amendments and received no
substantive comments. At its November 2002 meeting, the Planning Commission
voted unanimously to recommend approval of the proposed amendments. The
following are some of the key proposed changes:
· The ordinance requires an "in-field" verification of whether streams are
perennial, and therefore protected by Resource Protection Areas (RPAs). This
requirement is specifically mandated by the State Regulations.
· The location of BMPs in RPAs would be significantly limited. The
facilities can be placed in the RPA only if it is a regional facility and is
the minimum size necessary.
Preparer:
Joan Salvati
Title: Water Quality Administrator
Attachments:
Ycs
~]No
#000055
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Page 2 of 2
· Requests for exceptions must now go through a formal public hearing process
before a "committee, board, commission or special body." The proposed
ordinance establishes the Planning Commission as the body to hold those
public hearings.
· Provisions are included relating to golf courses. These provisions
represent the codification of conditions that the Board has placed on zoning
cases involving golf courses. A stakeholder group including the development
and environmental communities approved of this language, after receiving
input from several golf course managers.
The Chesapeake Bay Local Assistance Board has given localities until December
of 2003 to adopt the revised ordinance.
000059
AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE CODE OF THE COUNTY
OF CHESTERFIELD, 1997, AS AMENDED, BY AMENDING
AND RE-ENACTING SECTIONS 19-228, 19-229, 19-230, 19-231, 19-232,
19-233, 19-234, 19-235, 19-236, 19-241, 19-242 AND 19-301 RELATING TO
CHESAPEAKE BAY PRESERVATION AREAS
BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County:
(1) That Sections 19-228, 19-229, 19-230, 19-231, 19-232, 19-233, 19-234, 19-235, 19-236,
19-241, 19-242 and 19-301 of the Code of the County of Chesterfield, 1997, as amended, are
amended and re-enacted to read as follows:
DIVISION 4. CHESAPEAKE BAY PRESERVATION AREAS
Sec. 19-228. Resource protection area boundaries.
(a) At a minimum, resource protection areas shall consist of lands adjacent to water
bodies with perennial flow that have an intrinsic water quality value due to the ecological and
biological processes they perform or are sensitive to impacts which may cause significant
degradation to the quality of state waters. In their natural condition, these lands provide for the
removal, reduction or assimilation of sediments, nutrients and potentially harmful or toxic
substances in runoff entering the bay and its tributaries~ and minimize the adverse effects of
human activities on state waters and aquatic resources.
bLb.) Resource protection areas shall consist of:
(-a-) (1) Tidal wetlands.
Nontidal wetlands connected by surface flow ,..~-~ that are contiguous to (i) tidal
wetlands or (ii) water bodies with perennial flow *~"'* ..... ~ .....
(3) Tidal shores.
(4)
A vegetated conservation area a minimum of 100 feet in width, located adjacent
to and landward of the environmental features listed in subsections (1) (-a-) through
(3) (c--) above, and along both sides of any water body with perennial flow
a4~ta-D,-sw~a. The full conservation area shall be designated as the landward
component of the resource protection area.
Such other lands determined by the department of environmental engineering to
meet the provisions of subsection (a) of this section and to be necessary to protect
the quality of state waters.
(c) Designation of the components listed in subdivision (5) of subsection (b) shall not
be subject to modification unless based on a reliable, site specific information as provided for in
9 VAC 10-20-105.
1923:63078.1
Revised 11/07/03 1:45 PM
000060
Sec. 19-229. Resource management area boundaries.
(a) Resource management areas shall include land types that, if improperly used or
developed, have a potential for causing significant water quality degradation or for diminishing
the functional value of the resource protection area.
(b) A resource management area shall be provided contiguous to the entire inland
boundary of the resource protection area. Resource management areas consist of one or more of
the following:
(-a-) (1) One-hundred-year floodplains.
(-b-) (2) Highly erodible soils, including steep slopes.
(e-) (3) Highly permeable soils.
(-d-) (4) Nontidal wetlands not included in resource protection areas.
(-e-) (5) Land areas a minimum of 100 feet in width that are located adjacent to and
landward of every resource protection area.
Sec. 19-230. Chesapeake Bay preservation areas maps.
Chesapeake Bay preservation areas include resource protection areas and resource
management areas. Subject to any adjustments by the director of environmental engineering
pursuant to section 19-231, the boundaries of these areas are ~ included as a map
layer in the County's Geographic Information System (GIS) which is available for viewing in the
department of environmental engineering. This GIS map layer shall serve as the general
determination of the extent of the resource protection area boundary as defined in 9 VAC 10-20-
ou
Sec. 19-231.
boundaries and boundary adjustments.
Site-specific refinements of Chesapeake Bay Area
(a) As part of, or prior to, the zoning application process, or during the review of a
water quality impact assessment pursuant to subsection 19-232(e), a reliable, site-specific
evaluation shall be conducted by the county office of water quality to determine whether water
bodies on or adjacent to the proposed development site have perennial flow. The Resource
Protection Area boundaries for the site shall then be adjusted, as necessary, based on this
evaluation.
1923:63078.1
Revised 11/07/03 1:45 PM
00006 .
(a-) (b) The director of environmental engineering may adjust the delineation of any
resource protection area boundaries when an environmental site assessment prepared by a
qualified expert indicates a need for change based on the environmental features listed in section
.~'n ..v,,.j¥'°t~x 19-228(b)(1) through (d-) (4). The environmental site assessment shall be drawn to
scale and shall clearly delineate such environmental features. Wetlands delineations shall be
performed in accordance with the procedures specified in the most recently approved edition(s)
of the Federal Manual for Identifying and Delineating Jurisdictional Wetlands.
fkx (c)~,~j The director of environmental engineering may adjust the delineation of any
resource management area boundaries when an environmental site assessment prepared by a
qualified expert indicates a need for such change based on the environmental features listed in
section.~ln --~,,,~'~nf"x 19-229(b)(1) through (-e-) (5). The environmental site assessment shall be
drawn to scale and shall clearly delineate such environmental features. Wetlands delineations
shall be performed in accordance with the procedures specified in the most recently approved
edition(s) of the Federal Manual for Identifying and Delineating Jurisdictional Wetlands.
(c) (d) Any person aggrieved by the director of environmental engineering's decision
concerning the boundaries of a resource protection area or a resource management area may
appeal such decision in accordance with section 19-268(d).
(-d-) (e) Boundary adjustments shall not be available to property that is undergoing
redevelopment if, due to previous development of the property, the Chesapeake Bay preservation
area features listed in section~.ln .~....~.~'~'~ 19-228(b)(1) through ~.~'4~ (5) or section ~.ln ~-~.-~'~n~"~ 19-
229(b)(1) through (e-)(5) cannot be determined.
Sec. 19-232. Resource protection area regulations.
In addition to the general performance criteria set forth in section 19-233, the criteria in
this section are applicable in resource protection areas.
....h, .- .... :..~.4:4, :.: ..... .~. ~ .... ~. ...... .:.... .... .4 .... ~ ...... Land development may
be allowed in a resource protection area, subject to the approval of the department of
environmental engineering, only if it (i) is water dependent; (ii) constitutes redevelopment; (iii)
is a permitted encroachment established pursuant to subdivision (d) of this section; (iv) is a road
or driveway crossing satisfying the conditions set forth in subdivision (a)(4) of this section; or
(v) is a flood control or stormwater management facility satisfying the conditions set forth in
subdivision (a)(5) of this section.
(1)
water quality impact assessment in accordance with section 19-232(e)(1) shall be
required for any proposed land disturbance.
(2)
ami-egmpt~;-~. A new or expanded water-dependent facility may be permitted,
provided that:
1923:63078.1
Revised 11/07/03 1:45 PM
3 00006g
(3)
(4)
a. It does not conflict with the comprehensive plan;
bo
It complies with the performance criteria set forth in sections 19-232(b)
and 19-233;
Co
Any nonwater-dependent component is located outside any resource
protection area; and
d. Access shall be provided with minimum disturbance necessary. If
possible, a single point of access shall be provided.
Redevelopment shall be permitted in the Resource Protection Area only if there is
no increase in the amount of impervious cover and no further encroachment
within the Resource Protection Area, and it shall conform to applicable erosion
and sediment control and stormwater management criteria set forth in section 10-
233, as well as all applicable stormwater management requirements of other start
and federal agencies.
Roads and driveways not exempt under section 19-235 (a) (1) may be constructed
in or across Resource Protection Areas only if each of the following conditions
are met:
The department of environmental engineering makes a finding that there
are no reasonable alternatives to aligning the road or driveway in or across
the Resource Protection Area.
bo
The alignment and design of the road or driveway are optimized,
consistent with other applicable requirements, to minimize the
encroachment in the Resource Protection Area and adverse impacts on
water quality.
The design and construction of the road or driveway satisfies all
applicable criteria of this chapter, including submission of a water quality
impact assessment.
The department of environmental engineering reviews the plan for the
road or driveway proposed in or across the Resource Protection Area.
Flood control and stormwater management facilities that drain or treat water from
multiple development proiects or from a significant portion of a watershed may be
allowed in Resource Protection Areas, provided that (i) the department of
environmental engineering has conclusively established that the location of the
facility within the Resource Protection Area is the optimum location; (ii) the size
of the facility is the minimum necessary to provide necessary flood control,
stormwater treatment, or both; (iii) the facility must be consistent with the
Watershed Management Plan for the Swift Creek Reservoir or any other
stormwater management program that has been approved by the Chesapeake Bay
1923:63078.1
Revised 11/07/03 1:45 PM
OOO063
Local Assistance Board as a Phase I modification to the county's Chesapeake Bay
Preservation Act program; (iv) all applicable permits for construction in state or
federal waters must be obtained from the appropriate state and federal agencies,
such as the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers, the Virginia Department of
Environmental Quality, and the Virginia Marine Resources Commission; (v)
approval must be received from the department of environmental engineering
prior to construction; and (vi) routine maintenance is allowed to be performed on
such facilities to assure that they continue to function as designed. It is not the
intent to allow a best management practice that collects and treats runoff from
only an individual lot or some portion of the lot to be located with in a Resource
Protection Area.
(b) Conservation area requirements. The 100-foot conservation area shall be the
landward component of the Resource Protection Area as set forth in subsection 19-228 (b) (4).
Notwithstanding permitted uses and encroachments, as set forth in 19-232 (c) and (d), the 100-
foot conservation area shall not be reduced in width. To minimize the adverse effects of human
activities on the other components of the Resource Protection Area, state waters, and aquatic life,
a 100-foot wide conservation area of vegetation that is effective in retarding runoff, preventing
erosion, and filtering nonpoint source pollution from runoff shall be retained if present and
established where it does not exist. The following criteria shall apply to the 100-foot
conservation area.
(1)
............ ,,.,,,(::, .... ~.,,,~ .,,-.j ,..t.,l...,-, ,,~ ,.., ..........
.... ;.,.~., ~.~, ,h- ,,.., ......... ,; ...... The 100-foot wide conservation area
shall be deemed to achieve a 75% reduction of sediments and a 40% reduction of
(2)
nutrients.
-~'~;*:^-~ ,, . ~"~ .......o*""~',,~ . Where land uses such as agriculture or
silviculture within the area of the conservation area cease and the lands are
proposed to be converted to other uses, the full 100-foot wide conservation area
shall be reestablished. In reestablishing the conservation area, management
measures shall be undertaken to provide woody vegetation that assures the
conservation area functions set forth in this chapter.
1923:63078.1
Revised 11/07/03 1:45 PM
5
000064
(3) Existing vegetation in the conservation area shall not be cleared or disturbed
except (i) as provided in section 19-232(c) and (d) and (ii) with the prior approval
of the water quality administrator. Further, replacement of vegetation with a lawn
shall not constitute compliance with the requirements of 19-232 (b).
(4) All terrain vehicles shall be prohibited in Resource Protection Areas.
(c) Permitted modifications of the conservation area.
~.(1)
In order to maintain the conservation area's functional value, h~ggev, oas existing
vegetation may ~ be removed, subject to the approval of the water quality
administrator, only to provide for reasonable sight lines, access paths, ~
~ general woodlot management and best management practices, including
those that prevent upland erosion and concentrated flows of stormwater, as
follows:
-1-:. a_:
Trees may be pruned or removed if necessary to provide for sight lines
and vistas. If trees are removed, they shall be replaced with other
vegetation that, in the judgment of the water quality administrator, is
equally effective in retarding runoff, preventing erosion and filtering
nonpoint source pollution from runoff.
~ b_ Any ~ path shall be constructed and surfaced to effectively
control erosion.
Dead, diseased or dying trees or shrubbery and noxious weeds (such as
Johnson grass, kudzu, and multifora rose) may be removed and thinning of
trees may be allowed, pursuant to sound horticultural practices at-the
dis ........ 0ft~'e.. ~a~do... ...... ......, ....................... ,- - - · o .... v ............
4:. d_.
For shoreline erosion control projects, trees and woody vegetation may be
removed, necessary control techniques employed and appropriate
vegetation established to protect or stabilize the shoreline in accordance
with the best available technical advice and applicable permit conditions
or requirements.
1
1923:63078.1
Revised 11/07/03 1:45 PM
000065
(2)
On agricultural lands, the conservation area shall be managed to prevent
concentrated flows of surface water from breaching the conservation area and
appropriate measures may be taken to prevent noxious weeds (such as Johnson
grass, kudzu, and multiflora rose) from invading the conservation area. ~
.... 1-,~ ~,4 ....
Agricultural activities may encroach into the conservation area .... ., .........
only as follows:
-lw a_.:
of the full con~ervat!on area. Agricultural activities may encroach within
the landward 50 feet of the 100-foot wide conservation area when at least
one agricultural best management practice which, in the opinion of the
local soil and water conservation district board, addresses the more
predominant water quality issue on the adjacent land is being implemented
on the adjacent land provided that the combination of the undisturbed
conservation area and the best management practice achieves water
quality protection, pollutant removal, and water resource conservation at
least the equivalent of the 100-foot conservation area. If nutrient
management is identified as the predominant water quality issue, a
nutrient management plan, including soil tests, must be developed
consistent with the Virginia Nutrient Training and Certification
Regulations ( 4 VAC 5-15) administered by the Virginia Department of
Conservation and Recreation.
_~;~,~., ...;,u ,u;~ d;..;~;~. Agricultural activities may encroach within
the landward 75 feet of the lO0-foot wide conservation area when
agricultural best management practices which address erosion control,
nutrient management, and pest chemical control, approved by the James
River soil and water conservation district, are being implemented on the
adjacent land. The erosion control practices must prevent erosion from
exceeding the soil loss tolerance levels, referred to as "T," as defined in
the "National Soil Survey Handbook" of November 1996 in the "Field
1923:63078.1
Revised 11/07/03 1:45 PM
000066
Office Technical Guide" of the U.S. Department of Agriculture Natural
Resource Conservation Service. A nutrient management plan, including
soil tests, must be developed, consistent with the Virginia Nutrient
Management Training and Certification Regulations (4 VAC 5-15)
administered by the Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation.
In conjunction with the remaining conservation area, this collection of
best management practices shall be presumed to achieve water quality
protection at least the equivalent of that provided by the 100-foot
conservation area.
The conservation area is not required for drainage ditches associated with
agricultural land if the adjacent agricultural land has in place at least one
best management practices ~n a .... '~ ....... :*~' .......... *;~ ~""
........ .4 ~.., ,,~ ~ .... m ....e..:~ ...~ xxz.+~., r~ ........ +:on r,:~+.~+ which,
in the opinion of the James River soil and water conservation district,
addresses the predominant water quality issues on the adjacent land.
(d) Permitted encroachments into the conservation area.
When the application of the conservation area would result in the loss of a
buildable area on a lot or parcel recorded prior to October 1, 1989, encroachments
into the conservation area may be allowed through an administrative process, in
accordance with the following criteria:
ao
Encroachments into the conservation area shall be the minimum necessary
to achieve a buildable area for a principal structure and necessary utilities.
Where practicable, a vegetated area that will maximize water quality
protection, mitigate the effects of the conservation area encroachment, and
is equal to the area of encroachment into the conservation are shall be
established elsewhere on the lot or parcel.
Co
The encroachment may not extend into the seaward 50 feet of the
conservation area.
do
A written request for an exception to this division's requirements shall be
made to the director of environmental engineering. It shall identify the
impact of the proposed exception on water quality, on public safety and on
lands within the resource protection area through the completion of a
water quality impact assessment that complies with section 19-232 (e).
(c) (e) Water quality impact assessments and resource protection area restoration plans.
(1)
A water quality impact assessment shall be submitted to, and approved by, the
a..o,,,,.,. ^~, .... ~ ......+n~ ~:~.4.~ water quality administrator for any
proposed development within a resource protection area, including any
conservation area modification or r-eduetion encroachment authorized as provided
1923:63078.1
Revised 11/07/03 1:45 PM
8
000067
by section~n ,--~,-w~'~'~'~ 19-232(d), and may be required by the director of
environmental engineering for any other development in Chesapeake Bay
preservation areas based on the site's unique characteristics or the intensity of the
proposed use or development. The purpose of the water quality impact
assessment is to identify and, where applicable, quantify the impacts of proposed
development on water quality and lands in the Resource Protection Areas
consistent with the goals and objectives of the Chesapeake Bay Preservation Act,
this chapter, and to identify specific measures for the mitigation of those impacts.
There shall be two types of water quality impact assessments: a minor assessment
and a major assessment.
ao
Minor water quality impact assessment. A minor water quality impact
assessment shall be required for a development or redevelopment which
involves 2,500 square feet or less of land disturbance. The minor water
quality assessment must demonstrate that the combination of undisturbed
conservation area, restoration plantings and identified best management
practices or measures will be effective in retarding runoff, preventing
erosion, and filtering nonpoint source pollution from runoff. The minor
water quality impact assessment shall include a site drawing, to scale if
practicable, which shows the following:
(i) The location of the resource protection area;
(ii)
The location, and nature and quantification of proposed
encroachments into the resource protection area, including type of
material proposed to be used for access paths, areas of clearing or
grading, location of any structures, drives or other impervious
surfaces;
(iii) Justification for a~y the proposed encroachment;
(iv)
Type and proposed location of any best management practice
facilities or measures; and
(v) Existing and proposed runoff outfalls from the property:;
(vi)
Location and density of existing vegetation on site, including the
number and type of trees and other vegetation to be removed in the
conservation area as a result of the encroachment or modification;
and
(vii)
A restoration plan that includes the replacement of vegetation that
has been removed from the conservation area. The type, quantity
and density of vegetation shall be capable of retarding runoff,
preventing erosion, and filtering nonpoint source pollution from
runoff.
1923:63078.1
Revised 11/07/03 1:45 PM
O00068
Major water quality impact assessment. A major water quality impact
assessment shall be required for a development which exceeds 2,500
square feet of land disturbance. The major water quality impact
assessment shall be prepared by a qualified expert and shall include:
(i) All information required for a minor water quality impact
assessment;
fl~,~,:~, ~.~ ~..,~., ..... A description of the proposed
encroachment including:
A description of the proposed improvements, including
structures (including the type and size), roads, access paths,
irrigations systems, lighting systems, and utilities;
If an access path is proposed, an identification of the
location of the path and the materials that will be used for
the path.
(iii)
....... esc on
of the encroachment site's physical characteristics including:
The site's existing topography, soil characteristics, erosion
potential and hydrology;
A description of wetland areas including their functions and
values;
3_ A description of streams and other water bodies;
Location and density of existing vegetation on site,
including the number and type of trees and other vegetation
categorized by type (e.g. shrubs, trees, groundcover) within
50 feet of the proposed land disturbance.
(iv)
discussion of the potential water quality impacts of the proposed
encroachment, including:
A quantification of any identified impacts on streams or
other water bodies, including potential erosion and
sedimentation that could enter those waters as a result of
the encroachment;
An identification and quantification of any impacts on
wetlands, including impacts on wetland hydrology;
1923:63078.1
Revised 11/07/03 1:45 PM
10
000069
An identification of temporary or permanent impacts to
streams or other water bodies;
An identification of any areas to be disturbed outside the
resource protection area that have the potential to adversely
affect the resource protection area;
o
The limits of clearing, grading and the percent of the site to
be cleared;
Where applicable, an estimation of the pre-construction and
post-construction pollutant loads;
Estimation of the percent increase in impervious cover;
A discussion of the number and type of trees and other
vegetation to be removed in the conservation area as a
result of the encroachment or modification;
A discussion of proposed changes to the site topography
and hydrology and the impacts of those changes on water
quality;
10.
A construction schedule, including the anticipated duration
of construction.
(v)
~n..4....... -----.-- ,-,-..--,,'~; """k ..... A discussion of measures to mitigate the
identified impacts, including:
A Restoration Plan that includes the replacement of
vegetation that has been removed from the conservation
area. The Plan shall include the schedule for replanting,
which shall take into account the appropriate season for
replanting. The type, quantity and density of vegetation
specified shall be capable of retarding runoff, preventing
erosion, and filtering nonpoint source pollution from
runoff. The vegetation specified plantings shall, to the
maximum extent practicable, consist of native species.
A listing of proposed erosion and sediment control
measures, including additional measures that are beyond
those required chapter 8 of the Code of Chesterfield
County;
A listing of best management practices and measures to
reduce impacts on water quality;
1923:63078.1
Revised 11/07/03 1:45 PM
11
oooo?O
A discussion that demonstrates, in a quantifiable manner,
that the combination of revegetation and best management
practices will achieve pollutant removal that is equivalent
to that which is achieved without the encroachment.
o
A listing of other mitigation measures that may be required
by the director of environmental engineering or the water
quality administrator.
(vii)
(e) When a person has violated the requirements of this subsection, the violator shall
submit a resource protection area restoration plan to the water quality administrator for review
and approval. The intent of the restoration plan is to ensure that the resource protection area
function are restored in a manner that will achieve the pollutant removal requirements as defined
in 19-232(b)(1). The restoration plan shall specify the types and number of vegetation to be
planted and a schedule for the installation of the plantings. When determined to be necessary by
the water quality administrator, the violator shall provide surety in an amount sufficient, as
determined by the water quality administrator, to purchase and reinstall any vegetation required
by the restoration plan that has not survived for one year from date of installation. The surety
must be in a form approved by the county attorney's office and may consist of a certified check,
cash escrow, a surety bond, or a letter of credit from a financial institution. The establishment of
a lawn shall not constitute a satisfactory restoration of the resource protection area.
Sec. 19-233. o ................. · ......... ~-*:""~ General performance criteria.
Any use, development or redevelopment of land within a Chesapeake Bay Preservation
Area shall meet the following performance criteria:
(a)
No more land shall be disturbed than is necessary to provide for the ~
proposed use or development.
(b) Indigenous vegetation shall be preserved to the maximum extent
practicable consistent with the use or development allowed.
(c)
Land development shall minimize impervious cover consistent with the use or
development allowed.
(d) ~1%
~f ...... ~- ...... .er oknll k .... ,~ll~a Th .~k; .... *!.,~ C~11 .... ;~. All development
exceeding 2,500 square feet of land disturbance shall be subject to the site plan or
subdivision review processes.
1923:63078.1
Revised 11/07/03 1:45 PM
12
000071
bo
Any land disturbing activity that exceeds an area of 2,500 square feet (including
construction of all single family houses, septic tanks and drainfields, but other
wise as defined in § 10.1-560 of the Code of Virginia) shall comply with the
requirements of the local erosion and sediment control ordinance.
Stormwater management criteria consistent with the water quality protection
provisions (4 VAC 3-20-71 et. seq.) of the Virginia Stormwater Management
Regulations (4 VAC 3-20) shall be satisfied.
(2) (1)The following stormwater management options shall be considered to
comply with the requirements of this subsectionx,~j~.j.[axt' x.
ao
Incorporation on the site of best management practices that achieve
the requlre~ ccntrc!, meet the water quality protection
requirements set forth in this subsection. For the purposes of this
subsection, the "site" may include multiple projects or properties
that are adjacent to one another or lie within the same drainage
area where a single best management practice will be utilized by
those projects to satisfy water quality protection requirements;
bo
Com ance with a ...... ., ----~v ..... ~ ......... ~- '"'""'
OOAQ +k~+ .ok; ......... 1.,~1~.+ .... + ...... 1;+ ..... +~+; ~. the
Watershed Management Plan for the SwiR Creek Reservoir which
has been found by the Chesapeake Bay Local Assistance Bo~d to
achieve water quality protection equivalent to that required by this
subsection;:
Co
VPDES pe~it issued by the Dep~ment of Environmental
Quality, provided the dep~ment of environmental engineering
1923:63078.1
Revised 11/07/03 1:45 PM
13
000072
(h)
specifically determines that the permit requires measures that
collectively achieve water quality protection equivalent to that
required by this subsection.
A
Any maintenance, alteration, use or improvement to an existing structure
w~ich that does not degrade the quality of surface water discharge, as
determined by the director of environmental engineering, may be
exempted from the requirements of this subsection. Any person aggrieved
by a decision of the director of environmental engineering under this
subsection may appeal such decision in accordance with the procedures
provided in section 19-268(d).
~, ..... ~ nlq ..... ~ ................ Sto~water m*n*-~m~nt~ ~ ~ ,
criteria for redevelopment shall apply to any redevelopment.
t-f Where the best management practices utilized in a commercial development
require regular or periodic maintenance in order to continue their functions, such
maintenance shall be ensured by a maintenance/easement agreement, commercial
surety bond, bank letter of credit or other assurance satisfactory to the director of
environmental engineering, t-f Where the best management practices utilized for a
residential development require regular or periodic maintenance in order to
continue their functions, such maintenance shall be ensured by a commercial
surety bond, bank letter of credit or cash escrow in an amount equal to $100.00
for each dwelling unit in a residential development. The requirement excludes
apartment developments outside the Swift Creek Reservoir Watershed. The form
of any bond or letter of credit provided pursuant to this section shall be subject to
approval by the county attorney.
Land on which agricultural activities are being conducted, including but not
limited to crop production, pasture, and dairy and feedlot operations, shall have a
soil and water quality conservation -~ .......... ,4 ~.., ..~ T .... o; .... e~.;~ ..,,4
conducted that evaluates the effectiveness of existing practices pertaining to soil
erosion and sediment control, nutrient management, and management of
pesticides and, where necessary, results in a plan that outlines additional practices
needed to ensure that water quality protection is being accomplished consistent
with the Chesapeake Bay Preservation Act and this division.
1923:63078.1
Revised 11/07/03 1:45 PM
14
000073
The director of environmental engineering may authorize the developer to use a
retention or detention basin or alternative best management practice facility to
achieve the performance criteria set forth in ~ this chapter.
The department of environmental engineering shall require evidence of all
wetlands permits required by law prior to authorizing grading or other on-site
activities.
(k)
Proposed new golf courses and the significant refurbishment of existing golf
courses shall conform to the following criteria. Significant refurbishment entails
complete redesign and construction of existing golf course fairways and greens
and shall ~not constitute simply replanting of grass on existing fairways and
green s:
(1)
A nutrient and pest management plan must be submitted and approved by
the environmental engineering department and the county extension agent
prior to the initiation of golf course operations. All components of the
plan shall be implemented for the life of the golf course.
(2)
As much stormwater runoff as practicable shall be directed to ponds or
golf course features that have a pollutant removal capacity. Where this is
not achievable, all fertilized areas and parking areas must drain through
another form of best management practice (BMP) facility prior to entering
an adjacent water body. The department of environmental engineering
shall approve such BMPs.
Cart paths crossing natural watercourses shall be constructed at least one
foot above the 100-foot floodplain elevation. Such crossing structures
shall employ the column and beam construction method when crossing
resource protection areas, Riparian Corridor Management Areas (as
defined by the Swift Creek Reservoir Management Plan & Maintenance
Program), and wetlands.
Sec. 19-234. Exemptions in resource protection areas.
~-,, ........ : ....~, o~.~:~, ..~,~^, ~, .......... a ~.., ,u~ Virginia e~:,
· .,,., .. ,.,,,, w ""' '~ ~' t'""" ~"t't''~'''''~' '~'J "'"" o,.,,, a a
C ' Th foll0wi g
..................... v .............................. ,~ .............e n
land disturbances in resource protection areas may be exempt from the criteria of section 19-232
provided that, in the judgment of the director of environmental engineering, they comply with
subdivisions 1 through 4 below: (i) water wells; (ii) passive recreation facilities such as
boardwalks, trails and pathways; and (iii) historic preservation and archaeological activities.
Any required permits, except those to which this exemption specifically applies,
shall have been issued;
1923:63078.1
Revised 11/07/03 1:45 PM
15
OOO0?4
Sufficient and reasonable proof is submitted that the intended use shall not result
in an adverse impact on water quality;
(3) The intended use does not conflict with nearby planned or approved uses; and
Any land disturbance exceeding an area of 2,500 square feet shall comply with all
erosion and sediment control requirements of chapter 8 and the Code of
Chesterfield County.
(a)
(3)
(4)
(c---) (b) Silvicultural activities in Chesapeake Bay Preservation Areas shall be exempt
from this division's requirements, provided that such activities adhere to water quality protection
procedures prescribed by the department of forestry in its "Best Management Practices
Handbook for Forestry Operations," as amended. The Virginia Department of Forestry will
oversee and document installation of best management practices and will monitor in-stream
impacts of forestry operations in Chesapeake Bay Preservation Areas. This exemption shall not
apply to land disturbing activities on land in an agriculturally zoned district which is not used
directly for the management of agricultural crops, forest crops and livestock, or land which has
been rezoned or converted, or proposed to be rezoned or converted, at the request of the owner or
previous owner, from an agricultural to a residentially, commercially or industrially zoned
district or use.
1923:63078.1
Revised 11/07/03 1:45 PM
16
000075
Co
~ (c} Nonresidential uses which are located over 100 feet from and are not adjacent to
R, R-MF or R-TH Districts or any property used for residential purposes, schools, child care
centers, playgrounds, shopping centers, libraries, hospitals, public institutions or similar facilities
shall be exempt from the provisions of section~,.,'n ----'~/~~~'~t~w~ .... .~ ..,,,,.'4 w/,~m~'4 19-241.
Sec. 19-235. Exemptions and gexceptions.
~/a~ ..A ~,,,4t+ ......... + ~c ......... +;~. +^ +!~;~ A;..;.;~, ...... ; ..... +~ ~1~11 1~ ~A~ +~
..,u;.u ~ .....~..+~. +~.+ +u ........ + --';" "~+ ~ ~+~+"' + .... ~';~ ~"~+ ....~ .... ..~'~"'~. Public
utilities, railroads, public roads, and facilities exemptions.
(1)
Construction, installation, operation and maintenance of electric, natural gas,
fiber-optic and telephone transmission lines, railroads and public roads and their
appurtenant structures in accordance with (i) the Erosion and Sediment Control
Law (Va. Code §10.1-560 et seq.), and the Stormwater Management Act (Va.
Code § 10.1-603.1 et seq.), or (ii) an erosion and sediment control plan and
stormwater management plan approved by the Virginia Department of
Conservation and Recreation. The exemption of public roads is further
conditioned as follows: optimization of the road alignment and design, consistent
with other applicable requirements, to prevent or otherwise minimize
encroachment in the Resource Protection Area and adverse impacts on water
quality.
(2)
Construction, installation and maintenance of water, sewer natural gas, and
underground telecommunications and cable television lines owned, permitted, or
both, by the county or a regional service authority shall be exempt from this
division's requirements, provided that:
ao
To the degree possible, the location of such utilities and facilities should
be outside resource protection areas.
1923:63078.1
Revised 11/07/03 1:45 PM
17
000076
No more land than necessary shall be disturbed to provide for the
proposed utility installation.
All construction, installation and maintenance of such utilities and
facilities shall be in compliance with any applicable federal, state and local
requirements and permits and designed and conducted in a manner that
protects water quality.
Any land disturbance exceeding an area of 2,500 square feet shall comply
with all erosion and sediment control requirements of chapter 8 and this
division.
(1)
......................... * ..... Exceptions to the requirements of sections
19-232 and 19-233 may be granted, subject to the procedures set forth in 19-
235(b)(2), provided that a finding is made that:
a_ The requested exception is the minimum necessary to afford relief.
Granting the exception shall not confer any special privileges upon the
applicant that are denied by this division to other property owners who are
subject to its provisions and who are similarly situated.
The exception is in harmony with the purpose and intent of this division
and will not result in a substantial detriment to water quality.
The exception request is not based on conditions or circumstances that are
self-created or self-imposed.
Reasonable and appropriate conditions are imposed, as Warranted, that
will ensure that the permitted activity will not cause a degradation of water
quality.
fo
The request is being made because of the particular physical surroundings,
use, shape or topographical conditions of the specific property involved or
property adjacent to or within 100 feet of the subject property, or a
particular hardship to the owner will occur, as distinguished from a mere
inconvenience, if the strict letter of this division is carded out.
(2)
.~,~,4 =': imposed. Exception process.
1923:63078.1
Revised 11/07/03 1:45 PM
18
000077
a_ Exceptions to requirements of section 19-232.
A request for an exception to the requirements of section 19-232,
except for an encroachment permitted under 19-232(d), shall be
made in writing to the planning commission. It shall identify the
impact of the proposed exception on water quality, on public safety
and on lands within the resources protection area through
development of a water quality impact assessment which complies
with section 19-232 (e). Exception requests seeking relief from the
best management practice facility safety measures and design
criteria required in sections 19-241 and 19-242 shall not require the
completion of a water quality impact assessment if the request is
supported by documentation which demonstrates that the request
will not be detrimental to public safety and welfare.
The planning department shall notify the affected public of any
such exception requests and the planning commission shall
consider these requests during a public hearing in accordance with
Va. Code § 15.2-2204, except that only one hearing shall be
required.
The planning commission shall review the request for an exception
and the water quality impact assessment and may grant the
exception with such conditions and safeguards as deemed
necessary to further the purpose and intent of this division only if
the commission makes the findings set forth in section 19-
235(b)(1).
If the planning commission cannot make the required findings or
refuses to grant the exception, it shall return the request for an
exception together with the water quality impact assessment and
the written findings and rationale for the decision to the applicant.
Exceptions to the requirements of section 19-233. Upon written request,
the director of environmental engineering may approve exceptions to the
requirements of section 19-233 when the director finds that the criteria of
section 19-235(b)(1) have been satisfied.
(4)
(5)
1923:63078.1
Revised 11/07/03 1:45 PM
19
000078
Sec. 19-236. Other exceptions.
(1)
In addition to the requirements of this chapter, no use which is nonconforming to the
requirements of this division, in a Chesapeake Bay preservation area, shall be enlarged,
extended, reconstructed, substituted or structurally altered unless the director of
environmental engineering grants an exception pursuant to section 19-235, and also finds
that:
a. There will be no net increase in the nonpoint source pollution load; and
Any development or land disturbance exceeding an area of 2,500 square feet
complies with all erosion and sediment control requirements of chapter 8 and
division 4 of article IV of this chapter.
ooo
Sec. 19-241. Design criteria for all basins.
All basins required by the director of environmental engineering as either a stormwater
management facility or a Best Management Practice for water quality improvement or designed
as a retention or detention facility for any new development or redevelopment of property shall
conform to the following criteria:
(1) Safety criteria.
a. Outflow device safety measures.
If a vertical sided weir box is located within the basin's
embankment, a six-foot fence or dense vegetative barrier, or a
combination thereof, shall be installed as prescribed by the director
of environmental engineering. If a dense vegetative barrier is used,
it shall be designed and installed in accordance with professionally
accepted landscaping practices and procedures. ~
~ The director of environmental engineering shall
approve plans for the vegetative bar, er, includin~ ~hc size and
desc~ption of proposed plant martials. The dense vegetative
b~cr shall bca minimum of six fce~ in width. If a fence or
vegetative ba~cr is mbc established ~ound ~he entire basin
facility in accordance wi~h subsection (1)(b), ~hcn no b~cr or
fence is required ~ound ~hc weir box. If a developer uses a
1923:63078.1
Revised 11/07/03 1:45 PM
20
000079
concrete weir for either the principal or emergency spillway and
the concrete weir is greater than three feet in depth, a pedestrian
crossing or access structure shall be established across the weir. A
fence or vegetative barrier, or combination thereof, may be
substituted if the pedestrian crossing is not practicable.
b. Basin safety measures and dimensions.
The following safety measures shall be required for that portion of
each basin which that has a side slope above the normal water
surface ',;'hic~ that is steeper than 6:1 over a horizontal distance of
20 feet or more.
OOO
If a fence is used, the minimum height of the fence shall be six
feet. The fence may be made of a dense vegetative barrier. If the
fence is made of a vegetative barrier, it shall be designed and
installed in accordance with professionally accepted landscaping
ctices and p ocedu
pra r res ............... .. ~ ..............,
director of environmental engineering shall approve plans for the
vegetative b~er, including the size and description of proposed
plant materials. If a vegetative ba~er is used, the property owner
or developer shall provide to the county a fo~ of surety for the
cost of materials and installation for the proposed plant materials.
Provisions for m~ntenance of and access to the fence or vegetative
ba~er shall be included in the best management practice easement
dedication.
000
Side slopes. The side slopes above the normal water surface
elevation in basins shall be no steeper than 3:1 (horizontal to
vertical). If the excavation of the slope to 3:1 will result in the
removal of dense vegetation or woodland w~:.c~ that is acting to
stabilize the slope, the developer may seek an exception from the
director of environmental engineering pursuant to the provisions of
section 19-235 to leave the slope in its existing condition.
000
Sec. 19-242. Minimum criteria for basins serving as a best management practice for water
quality improvement.
(a) Depth. Basins sized solely as best management practice facilities in conformance with the
Chesapeake Bay Preservation Act shall have a range in depth of three to eight feet to prevent
1923:63078.1
Revised 11/07/03 1:45 PM
21
000080
stratification. For those basins which have been designed with sections which exceed eight feet
in depth, only those portions which are less than eight feet in depth shall be included as part of
the best management practice facility volume. Basins which that are less than one acre in surface
area shall not exceed eight feet in depth.
000
Sec. 19-301. Definitions.
Nontidal wetlands: Those wetlands other than tidal wetlands "that are inundated or
saturated by surface water or groundwater at a frequency and duration sufficient to support, and
that under normal circumstances do support, a prevalence of vegetation typically adapted for life
in saturated soil conditions'_', as defined by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency pursuant
to section 404 of the federal Clean Water Act in 33 CFR 328.3b, ~+~ *'Tc,"e~'e~ ' ~ ' nQ,~ n~
ameeded.
000
Resource protection area: That component of the Chesapeake Bay preservation area
comprised of lands,,,~+ e,, ..... ,,,~,, +u~,,,~ ~,,v,,,_,~~^~:~ adjacent to water bodies with perennial flow that have
an intrinsic water quality value due to the ecological and biological processes they perform or are
sensitive to impacts that may result in significant degradation to the quality of state waters.
000
Silvicultural activities: Forest management activities, including but not limited to the
harvesting of timber, the construction of roads and trails for forest management purposes, and the
preparation of property for reforestation that are conducted in accordance with the silvicultural
best management practices developed and enforced by the State Forester pursuant to Va. Code §
10.1-1105 and are located on property defined as real estate devoted to forest use under Va. Code
§ 58.1-3230.
000
Tidal wetlands: Vegetated and nonvegetated wetlands as defined in Va. Code § 28.2-
1300.
000
000
Water Body with Perennial Flow: A body of water that flows in a natural or man-made
channel year-round during a year of normal precipitation. This includes, but is not limited to
streams, estuaries, and tidal embayments and may include drainage ditches or channels
constructed in wetlands or from former natural drainage ways, which convey perennial flow.
1923:63078.1
Revised 11/07/03 1:45 PM
22
00005 .
Lakes and ponds, through which a perennial stream flows, are a part of the perennial stream.
Generally, the water table is located above the streambed for most of the year and groundwater is
the primary sources for stream flow.
000
Water-dependent facility: A development of land that cannot exist outside of a resource
protection area and must be located on the shoreline because of the intrinsic nature of its
operation. These facilities include, but are not limited to:
(1) Ports.
(2)
The intake and outfall structures of power plants, water treatment plants, sewage
treatment plants and storm sewers.
(3) Marinas and other boat docking structures.
(4) Natural bt;leaches and other water-oriented recreation areas.
(5) Fisheries or other marine resources facilities.
000
(2) That this ordinance shall become effective immediately upon adoption.
1923:63078.1
Revised 11/07/03 1:45 PM
23 00005;
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Page I of 4
Meetin~l Date:
Subiect:
January 28, 2004
Item Number: 8.C.3.
Approval of FY2004 School Board Capital Improvement Plan Mid-Year
Revisions
County Administrator's Comments:
County Administrator: ~
Board Action Requested~//-
The School Board requests the Board of Supervisors to increase the
appropriation in the School Capital Improvements fund by $338,800 by (1)
appropriating $365,000 of School non-Federal Food Service fund balance, (2)
returning $26,200 to the School Federal Food Service fund balance, and (3)
authorize transfers among projects as outlined in attachments.
Summary of Information:
On January 28, 2003 the School Board approved the FY2004 School Capital
Improvement Program totaling $24,632,900, including the use of Virginia
Public School Authority bonds ($16,369,200), state construction funds
($793,000) and CIP reserve ($7,470,700). At the September 23, 2003
meeting, the School Board approved a revision to the CIP to increase
appropriations by $103,894,000 to accelerate the two new high schools and
the conversion of Clover Hill High School to a middle school by entering
into a comprehensive agreement under the PPEA. On December 11, 2003 the
Board of Supervisors approved the construction of only one new high school
under the PPEA agreement and increased the CIP to reflect this decision.
Based upon that action, the School Board at a special called meeting on
December 15, 2003 adjusted the CIP downward by $57,209,500 for a revised
CIP total of $71,317,400. In addition to those revisions, several other
funding issues need to be addressed.
Preparer:
Billy K. Cannaday, Jr., Ed.D.
Title: Superintendent
Attachments:
Ycs
'~No
# 00005,
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Page 2 of 4
The County received notification on October 7, 2003 of $268,875 interest
savings on the refunding of the 1994A VPSA bonds. In the past, any such
savings was used to reduce debt service; however, there is a requirement in
this refunding that the savings be spent on school construction within six
months of the refunding. Because of this requirement, staff is requesting
that these funds replace State capital improvement funds in the Meadowbrook
High School project. The State capital improvement funds can then be
transferred to the School Operating Fund to reduce the amount of debt
service. Appropriation of these funds will be requested during the
quarterly review of the School Operating Fund.
CIP Reserve needs have been reduced by $306,000 (Curtis Elementary $16,000
and Thomas Dale $290,000). Also, both C. E. Curtis and J. G. Hening
Elementary projects are close to completion and there are surplus bond
funds in these projects ($184,000 and $700,000, respectively). These funds
should be transferred to the New Cosby Road High School project.
Funding for two new high schools was included in the Plan with all funding
placed in the Genito Road site project until final approvals had been
received. Since construction of a new high school at the Genito Road site
was not approved in fiscal year 2004, these funds should be transferred to
the New Cosby Road High School Project ($10.2M).
The Clover Hill renovation project is complete. The State funding
remaining in this project ($173,715) will be moved to the Hensley Road
project ($73,715) and the Manchester High renovations project ($100,000).
Chesterfield Community High, Midlothian High, and Monacan High technology
projects are complete and the State funds ($316,475) remaining in these
projects will be used to begin addressing middle school needs. Carver and
Matoaca Middle Schools' technology needs will be met using State
Governor's Technology funds ($111,475 and $205,000, respectively).
Twelve existing Federal Food Service projects (Bellwood, Bon Air,
Crestwood, Curtis, Davis, Falling Creek Elementary, Harrowgate, Bailey
Bridge, Chester, Falling Creek Middle, Manchester Middle, and Midlothian
Middle) are now complete. Eight other projects (Chalkley, Gordon, Grange
Hall, Watkins, Robious Middle, Salem Middle, Swift Creek Middle, and
Perrymont Road) are still in progress. Federal food service funding is
being transferred between projects to cover the needs accordingly. After
all of the capital improvement needs are met, there is a balance of
$26,200 that must be transferred back to the Federal Food Service fund
balance.
000084
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Page 3 of 4
Four existing Non-Federal Food Service projects (L. C. Bird, Clover Hill
High, James River, and Thomas Dale) are now complete. Four other projects
Manchester, Matoaca, Midlothian and Monacan High) are still in progress.
The FY04 Non-Federal Food Service Fund included $365,000 to be used for
these capital improvements; therefore, there is a need to appropriate
these funds to the School Capital Improvements fund to be used as planned.
The revisions described above are summarized on Attachment A and result in
an increase to the School Capital Improvement Fund of $338,800 consisting
of an increase of $365,000 in Non-Federal Food Service funds and a
decrease of $26,200 in Federal Food Service funds. Following approval of
these revisions, all projects are balanced within their current funding
levels.
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Page 4 of 4
Meeting Date: January 28, 2004
Budget and Management Comments:
This item requests approval of numerous changes as outlined in the summary
of information and attachments for School Capital Projects. The net change
being requested is an increase in School Capital Project appropriations by
$338,800. This is being accomplished by an increase in appropriations of
$365,000 in School Non-Federal Food Service revenue and a reduction of
$26,200 in School Federal Food Service revenue.
Preparer: Rebecca T. Dickson
Title: Director, Budget and Manaqement
000086
Attachment A- 1
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS
SCHOOL CIP PROJECT REPORT
CURRENT STATUS (as of December 31, 2003)
New Facilities
New Matoaca High School
New Genito Road High School
New Cosby Road High School
Total New Facilities
Beginning Current Revised Needs Surplus
FY03 Bud¢;et Budaet Bud¢~et (Deficifl
49,133,801 49,234,201 49,234,201 0
11,109,941 11,109,941 909,941 10,200,000
0 46,684,500 58,074,500 (11,390,000)
60,243,741 107,028,641 108,218,641 (1,190,000)
Status
In progress
In progress
Deleted
Renovations
J A Chalkley Renovations
C. E. Curtis Elem Renov/Cafe & Gym
Grange Hall Elem Renovations
Greenfield Elern Renovations
J G Hening Renovations
Bailey Bridge Middle School
Chester Middle Renovations
Clover Hill High Renovations
Manchester HS Renovations
Meadowbrook HS Renovations
Midlothian Field House
Monacan HS Field House
Thomas Dale High Renovations
Technical Center Renovations
Total Renovations
7,094,428 7,094,428 7,094,428 0
3,841,000 3,641,000 3,641,000 200,000
4,417,625 4,417,625 4,417,625 0
4,900,000 4,900,000 4,900,000 0
3,000,000 3,000,0(X) 2,300,000 700,000
5,973,176 5,973,176 5,973,176 0
10,625,341 10,625,341 10,625,341 0
531,988 531,988 358,273 173,715
4,645,220 4,645,220 4,745,220 (100,000)
37,600,878 37,600,878 37,600,878 0
1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 0
999,263 999,263 999,253 0
32,365,592 32,365,592 32,075,592 290,000
9.231.500 9.231.500 9.231.500 0
126,226,010 126,226,010 124,962,295 1,253,715
In progress
Complete
In progress
In progress
Complete
In progress
In progress
Complete
In progress
In progress
New Project
New Project
Complete
In progress
Food Service Prolecta:
Bellwood FS Renovations 182,500
Bon Air FS Renovations 93,100
Chaikley FS Renovations 15,000
Crestwood FS Renovations 126,000
Curtis FS Renovations 59,700
Davis FS Renvoations 80,100
F C Elom FS Renovations 50,600
Gordon Elom FS Renovations 64,300
Grange Hail Elem FS Renovations 425,000
Harrowgate FS Renovations 212,100
Hening FS Renovations 0
Watkins FS Renvoations 84,800
Bailey Bridge MS FS Renovations 250,000
Chester MS FS Renovations 250,000
Failing Creek Middle FS Renovations 71,000
Manchester Middle FS Renovations 83,500
Midlothian Middle FS Renovations 68,500
Robioue Middle FS Renovations 202,500
Salem Middle FS Renovations 160,500
Swift Creek Middle FS Renovations 0
Perrymont Road FS Renovations 45,500
L C Bird HS FS Renovations 0
Clover Hill HS FS Renovations 353,366
James River HS FS Renovations 165,149
Manchester HS FS Renovations 75,000
Matoaca HS FS Renovations 65,000
Midlothian HS FS Renovations 134,337
Monacan HS FS Renovations 0
Thomas Dale HS FS Renovations 182.329
Total Food Service Projects 3,489,880
182,500 164,500 (2,000)
93,100- 65,600 7,500
15,000 20,000 (5,000)
126,000 86,000 40,000
59,700 61,700 (2,000)
80,100 79,600 500
50,600 50,500 0
64,300 64,300 0
425,000 400,000 25,000
212,100 212,100 0
0 0 0
84,800 84,800 0
250,000 76,300 173,700
250,000 250,000 0
71,000 71,000 0
202,500 232,500 (30,000)
160,500 191,500 (31,000)
0 175,000 (175,000)
46,500 21,000 24,500
0 0 0
353,366 355,276 (1,910)
155,149 156,092 (943)
75,000 175,000 (100,000)
134,337 264,337 (150,000)
0 131,643 (131,643)
182.329 182.833 (504)
3,469,880 3,828,680 (338,800)
Complete
Complete
In progress
Complete
Complete
Complete
Complete
In progress
In progress
Complete
Delayed
In progress
Complete
Complete
Complete
Complete
Complete
In progress
In progress
New Project
New Project
Complete
Complete
Complete
In progress
In progress
In progress
In progress
Complete
Supervision/Debt/Other
Supervision & Contingency 8,425,623
School ClP Debt Transfer 8,618,550
Parks & Recreation Maintenance 574,800
School Maintenance 13,079,716
Spring Run Elem/Hensley Road 215,000
Carver Middle Technology 0
Matoaca Middle Technology 0
JRHS Gov Technology 0
Midlothian HS Gov Technology 500,000
Monacan HS Gov Technology 475,000
Chestert'ield Community HS Technology 275,000
Technology Infrastructure & Equipment 3.226.573
Total Supervision/Debt/Other 35.390.261
TOTAL ALL SCHOOL ClP PROJECTS $225,349,893
8,975,623 8,975,623 0
8,618,550 8,618,550 0
574,800 574,800 0
14,279,538 14,279,538 0
215,000 288,715 (73,715)
0 111,475 (111,475)
0 205,000 (205,000)
0 0 0
500,000 349,692 150,308
475,000 326,953 148,047
275,0(X) 256,880 18,120
9.646.873 9.646.873 ~.
4,,3.560.483 43.634.199 (73.715~
$280,305,015 $280,643,815 ($338,800)
in progress
In progress
In progress
In progress
In progress
New project
New project
Complete
Complete
Complete
Complete
In progress
000087
INgW Facilities
New Matoaca High School
New Ganito Road High School
New Cosby Road High School
Total New Facilities
Renovations
J A Chaikley Renovations
C. E. Curtis Elem Renov/Cafe & Gym
Grange Hall Elem Renovations
Greenfield Elem Renovations
J G Haning Renovations
Bailey Bridge Middle School
Chester Middle Renovations
Clover Hill High Renovations
Manchester HS Renovations
Meadowbrook HS Renovations
Midlothian Fiaid House
Monacan H$ Field House
Thomas Daie High Renovations
Technical Center Renovations
Total Renovations
Food Service Prolecta:
Bailwoud FS Renovations
Bon Air FS Renovations
Chaikley FS Renovations
Crestwood FS Renovations
Curtis FS Renovations
Davis FS Renvoations
F C Elem FS Renovations
Gordon Elem FS Renovations
Grange Hall Elem FS Renovations
Harrowgate FS Renovations
Haning FS Renovations
Watkins FS Ranvoations
Bailey Bridge MS FS Renovations
Chester MS FS Renovations
Failing Creek Middle FS Renovations
Manchester Middle FS Renovations
Midlothian Middle FS Renovations
Robious Middle FS Renovations
Saiem Middle FS Renovations
Swift Creek Middle FS Renovations
Per~¥mont Road FS Renovations
L C Bird HS FS Renovations
Clover Hill HS FS Renovations
James River HS FS Renovations
Manchester HS FS Renovations
Matoaca HS FS Renovations
Midlothian HS FS Renovations
Monacan HS FS Renovations
Thomas Daie HS FS Renovations
Total Food Service Projects
Supervision/Debt/Other
Supen~sion & Contingency
School CIP Debt Transfer
Parks & Recreation Maintenance
School Maintenance
Spring Run Elem/Hensley Road
Carver Middle Technology
Matoaca Middle Technology
JRHS Gov Technology
Midlothian HS Gov Technology
Monacan HS Gov Technology
Chesterfield Community HS Technology
Technology Infrastructure & Equipment
Total Supervision/Debt/Other
TOTAL ALL SCHOOL ClP PROJECTS
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS
SCHOOL ClP PROJECT REPORT
RECOMMENDED REVISIONS
1996 GO VPSA ClP State Gov County
Bonds/interest Bonds Reserve Tech & ClP Proffers
(10,200,000)
884,000 10,200,000 306,000
884,000 0 306,000 0
(184,000) (16,000)
793,000
(700,000)
268,875 (793,000)
(290,0O0)
268,875 (306,000)
(793,000)
(173,715)
100,000
524,125
(342,590)
0 0 0 0 0
73,715
111,475
205,000
(150,308)
(148,047)
(18,120)
73.715
($268,875)
o
$o
Food Service
Transfer
0
(7,500)
5,000
(40,OO0)
2,000
(5OO)
0
0
(25,000)
0
0
0
(173,700)
0
0
0
0
30,000
31,000
175,000
(24,500)
0
1,910
943
100,000
(20,000)
150,000
131,643
338,800
Attachment A-2
0
Total
Revisions
0
(10,200,000)
11,390,000
1,190,000
0
(200,000)
0
0
(700,000)
0
0
(173,715)
100,000
0
0
0
(290,000)
0
(1,263,715)
2,000
(7,500)
5,000
(40,000)
2,000
(500)
0
0
(25,000)
0
0
0
(173,700)
0
0
0
0
30,000
31,000
175,000
(24,500)
0
1,910
100,000
(20,000)
150,000
131,643
338,800
0
0
0
0
73,715
111,475
205,000
0
(150,308)
(148,047)
(18,120)
0
73.715
New Facilities
New Matoaca High School
New Genito Road High School
New Cosby Road High School
Total New Facilities
Renovations
J A Challdey Renovations
C. E. Curtis Elern Renov/Cafe & Gym
Grange Hall Elern Renovations
Greanfietd Elem Renovations
J G Haning Renovations
Bailey Bridge Middle School
Chester Middle Renovations
Clover Hill High Renovations
Manchester HS Renovations
Meadowbrook HS Renovations
Midlothian Field House
~ HS Field House
Thomas Dale High Renovations
Technical Center Renovations
Total Renovations
Food Service Prolects:
Betiwood FS Renovations
Bon Air FS Renovations
Chalkisy FS Renovations
Crestwood FS Renovations
Curtis FS Renovations
Davis FS Renvoations
F C Elem FS Renovations
Gordon Elern FS Renovations
Grange Hail Elem FS Renovations
Harrowgate FS Renovations
Hening FS Renovations
Watkins FS Renvoations
Bailey Bddge MS FS Renovations
Chester MS FS Renovations
Falling Creek Middle FS Renovations
Manchester Middle FS Renovations
Midlothian Middle FS Renovations
Robious Middle FS Renovations
Salern Middle FS Renovations
Swift Creek Middle FS Renovations
Perrymont Road FS Renovations
L C Bird HS FS Renovations
Clover Hill HS FS Renovations
James River HS FS Renovations
Manchester HS FS Renovations
Matoaoa HS FS Renovations
Midlothian HS FS Renovations
Monacan HS FS Renovations
Thomas Daie HS FS Renovations
Total Food Service Projects
Supervision/Debt/Other
Supervision & Contingency
School ClP Debt Transfer
Parks & Recreation Maintenance
School Maintenance
Spdng Run Elem/Hensley Road
Carver Middle Technology
Matoaca Middle Technology
JRHS Gov Technology
Midlothian HS Gov Technology
Monacan HS Gov Technology
Chesterfiald Community HS Technology
Technology Infrastructure & Equipment
Total Supervision/Debt/Other
TOTAL ALL SCHOOL CIP PROJECTS
Attachment A-3
0
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS
SCHOOL ClP PROJECT REPORT
EFFECT OF RECOMMENDED REVISIONS
Revised Budget Surplus
w/Adlustmenta (Deficit}
49,234,201 0
909,941 0
58,074,500 0
108,218,641 0
7,094,428 0
3,641,000 0
4,417,625 0
4,900,000 0
2,300,000 0
5,973,176 0
10,625,341 0
358,273 0
4,745,220 0
37,600,878 0
1,000,000 0
999,263 0
32,075,592 0
9.231.500 0
124,962,295 0
164,500 0
85,600 0
20,000 0
86,000 0
61,700 0
79,600 0
50,600 0
64,300 0
400,000 0
212,100 0
0 0
64,800 0
76,300 0
250,000 0
71,000 0
83,500 0
68,500 0
232,500 0
191,500 0
175,000 0
21,000 0
0 0
355,276 0
156,092 0
175,000 0
45,000 0
264,337 0
131,643 0
182.833 o
3,828,680 0
8,975,623 0
8,618,550 0
574,800 0
14,279,638 0
288,715 0
111,475 0
205,000 0
0 0
349,692 0
326,953 0
256,880 0
~.646.873 0
~3.634.199 0
$280,643,815 $0
000089
VIRGINIA: At a regular meeting of the
Chesterfield County School Board held
Tuesday evening, January 13, 2004, at
seven-thirty o'clock in the Public
Meeting Room at the Chesterfield
County Courthouse Complex
PRESENT:
James R. Schroeder, D.D.S., Chairman
Marshall W. Trammell, Jr., Vice-Chairman
Elizabeth B. Davis
Thomas J. Doland
Dianne E. Pettitt
RESOLUTION
WHEREAS CCPS has received notification of VPSA refunding in the amount of $268,875 that
has to be used for school construction within six months; and, WHEREAS these funds will be
used to replace State capital improvement funding in the Meadowbrook High project; and,
WHEREAS the State capital improvement funds can be used to offset debt service and therefore
will be transferred to the School Operating fund for this use; and, WHEREAS a request for
appropriation of these funds to the School Operating Fund will be requested during the quarterly
review of the School Operating Fund; and, WHEREAS several school projects are complete and
the surplus GO bond funds of $884,000 in these projects as well as $306,000 of School CIP
Reserve funds that are available within these projects is requested to be used to fund the New
Cosby Road High School project; and, WHEREAS School Food Services has identified needs
in the Non-Federal Food Service Fund for capital improvements requiring a transfer of $365,000
to the School Capital Improvements Fund to cover renovation projects in various locations; and,
WHEREAS the projects from the Federal Food Service Fund need to be reduced by $26,200
thereby transferring these funds back to the Federal Food Service fund balance; NOW
THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that on motion of Mr. Trammell, seconded by Mrs. Davis,
the School Board requests the Board of Supervisors to appropriate an additional $338,800 to the
School Capital Improvements Fund for revisions as described in this agenda item.
Billy K~fnnaday, Jr., Ed..1~, ul~ri~te~dent
000090
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Page I of 2
Meetin~l Date:
January 28, 2004
Item Number: 8.C.4.
Subiect:
Appropriation of State Regional Reinvestment Funds for the Community
Services Board
County Administrator's Comments:
County Administrator:
Board Action Requested:
Appropriate $149,057 in State funds and create three full time positions to
enhance the Community Services Board's Psychological Rehabilitation Service
Summary of Information:
In partnership with Community Services Boards in Region IV and the State of
Virginia, a reinvestment initiative was begun to improve services for persons
with persistent, long-term mental illness. The reinvestment funds are former
state facility dollars transferred to the region's Community Services Boards
for community services. Major commitments of the initiative are to serve
persons in the least restrictive environment, focus on recovery, develop a
full continuum of care and provide timely services. Regional services have
been developed that provide alternatives to more expensive hospitalization.
The $149,057 in funds will permit the Mental Health, Mental Retardation, and
Substance Department to improve access to specialized services to
Chesterfield consumers by creating new positions for a psychiatric nurse, a
case manager, and a counselor.
Preparer:
Geor,qe E. Braunstein
Title: Executive Director
Community Services Board
Attachments:
-~ Yes
No
00009!
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Page 2 of 2
Meeting Date: January 28, 2004
Budget and Management Comments:
This item requests the Board to appropriate $149,057 in state funds and
create three full time positions with funds provided the Community Services
Board from the State's reinvestment initiative. In the first year, the
$149,057 will be used to pay for the three positions, various office start
up costs, and purchase of service items. Additional funds in the amount of
$163,845 are expected to continue the program in FY05 and will be included
in the county's FY05 budget. It is expected that these funds will continue
to be available for this purpose in future years.
Preparer: Rebecca T. Dickson
Title: Director, Budget and Manaqement
000092
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Page I of I
Meetin~l Date: January28, 2004 Item Number: 8.C.5.
Subiect: Designation of Rights of Way at Courthouse Complex
County Administrator's Comments:
County Administrator: ~
//
Board Action Reques~d~esignate rights of way for Government Center Parkway and
Mimms Drive and authorize the County Administrator to execute the necessary
Declaration.
Summary of Information:
In order for the recently constructed portions of Government Center Parkway
and Mimms Drive to be accepted into the Secondary System of State Highways,
it is necessary for 8.639 acres of county property be designated as public
right of way.
Approval is recommended.
District: Dale
Preparer: John W. Harmon
Title: Ri,qht of Way Mana,qer
Attachments:
Ycs
----]No
d ooo93
VICINITY SKETCH
DESIGNATION OF RIGHTS OF WAY AT COURTHOUSE COMPLEX
el
Chesterfield County' Department of Utilities
1 llok eq~a~ 666E1 l~et
000094
O~ 10(~ PO 1~81
EIT..*~ PUBUC SN~ETY WAY
TAX R'A,~
(~'~c~)
TAX P,~qc~. NO. 771ee3o?3eoo(~o
. COUN'h' Gl~ CHE:~r~RF"II:LO
DO 827 PG
O0 637 RG 24.
9722 LOR~ LANE
TAX P,AR~ NO: 7"~ie(t40t12100000
6801 LUCY CORR BL'Vl).
STA1T ROUI~ NO.
(aO'
OB 21~0 PO 20,3
T'I M'MONS Gl ROiU P "'"~
o° 4D"'e '
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Page I of I
Meetin~l Date: January28, 2004 Item Number: 8.C.6.
Subiect: Acceptance of a Parcel of Land Along the West Right of Way Line of
Otterdale Road from Virginia S. Gobble
County Administrator's Comments:
County Administrator: ~
Board Action Requested: Accept the conveyance of a parcel of land containing
0.128 acres along the west right of way line of Otterdale Road (State Route
667) from Virginia S. Gobble, and authorize the County Administrator to
execute the deed.
Summary of Information:
This dedication is for Magnolia Green Subdivision. Approval is recommended.
District: ~atoaca
Preparer: John W. Harmon
Title: Ri,qht of Way Mana,qer
Attachments:
--]No
000096
VICINITY SKETCH
ACCEPTANCE OF A PARCEL OF LAND ALONG THE
WEST RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF OTTERDALE ROAD
FROM VIRGINIA $. GOBBLE
00097
Chesterfield County Depar[ment of Utilities
1 Iici eq~a~ &16J~?/~et
DONALD F'. GOBBLE AND
WRGINIA $. GOBBLE
0.8. t$tO PC. 455
TAX ID NO.: 70~673524100000
APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF'
CENTERLINE OF' I0' WIDE
CdcP BURIED CABLE
O,B. I686 PG. I650
N
E 11708784.18
CI
R,,,3474.12'
L-I28.90°
T-64,46'
~.2'07'33"
CHD,, S25'35'OO"E
128.90'
VIRGINIA S. GOBBLE
D.B. 1646 PG. 1699
ID NO.:. 708673435400000
6710 OTTERDALE ROAD
V.~R. FID?H VDO~'
O. 050 ACRE
0.~28 ACRE
SAL VA TORE J. CANGIANO
O.B. 3893 PG. 622
TAX ID NO.: 708673297300000
OTTER ~
E. SaDLER
o.B. 1872 Pc. 1oo2 / \
NOTE:
~15 PLAt WAS PREPARED ~r ~g
BEN~r ~ A ~E BINDER, ~EREF~E
EXI~NG EA~MEN~ MAY NO~ BE $HO~,
~IS PLAT REPRE~N~ A ~RREN~ R~O SUR~
ALL IMPRO~MEN~ ARE NOT ~0~.
r780. 7I
708 723.12
~,~'~-ro~-~/~--
WOOLRIDGE ROAD
0 DENOTES ROD FOUND
· DENOTES ROD SE r
PLAT SHOFING 0.128 ACRE OF LAND
TO BE DEDICATED AND A VARIABLE FIDTH
VDOT SLOPE AND DRAINAGE EASEMEN~
ACROSS THE PROPERTY OF
VIRGINIA S. GOBBLE
MATOACA DISTRICT ~ CHESTERFIELD CO., VIRGINIA
GRAPHIC SCALE I INCH ~, 50 FEEl'
~ ~R$ ~ER$
~~PORA~ HE~AR~RS '
711 N. C~R~ ROAD
.... RI~M~0. ~R~NIA 252~-409g
TE~EPHONE: (~4) 794-3500 FAX: (804~ 79~-765~
~ NO.:
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Page I of I
Meetin~l Date: January28, 2004
Item Number: 8.C.7.a.
Subject:
Request to Quitclaim a Portion of a Twenty-Foot Storm Water
Management/Best Management Practice Easement Across the Property of
Selected Investment Holdings, L.L.C.
County Administrator's Comments:
County Administrator: (~
//
Board Action Requeste~:Authorize the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors and
the County Administrator to execute a quitclaim deed to vacate a portion of a
20' SWM/BMP easement across the property of Selected Investment Holdings,
L.L.C.
Summary of Information:
Selected Investment Holdings, L.L.C. has requested the quitclaim of a portion
of a 20' SWM/BMP easement across its property as shown on the attached plat.
Staff has reviewed the request and recommends approval.
District: Clover Hill
Preparer: John W. Harmon
Title: Ri,qht of Way Manaqer
Attachments:
Ycs
-]No
VICINITY SKETCH
REQUEST TO QUITCLAIM A PORTION OF A TWENTY
FOOT SWM/BMP EASEMENT ACROSS THE PROPERTY
OF SELECTED INVESTMENT HOLDINGS, L.L.C.
Y
N
000100
Chesterfield County Department of Utilities
1 llci eqlal~ 6668? l~et
!
I
/
!
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Page I of I
Meetin~l Date: January 28, 2004
Subject:
Item Number: 8.C.7.b.
Request to Quitclaim a Portion of a Sixteen-Foot Water Easement
and a Portion of a Sixteen-Foot Sewer Easement Across the Property
of Katherman Investments, Incorporated
County Administrator's Comments:
County Administrator: (~ ?/
Board Action Requeste.~/Authorize the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors and
the County Administrator to execute a quitclaim deed to vacate a portion of a
16' water easement and a portion of a 16' sewer easement across the property
of Katherman Investments, Inc.
Summary of Information:
Katherman Investments, Inc. has requested the quitclaim of a portion of a 16'
water easement and a portion of a 16' sewer easement across its property as
shown on the attached plat. Staff has reviewed the request and recommends
approval.
District: Clover Hill
Preparer: John W. Harmon
Title: Ri.qht of Way Manaqer
Attachments:
Ycs
--]No
# 000:1.0,?,
VICINITY SKETCH
REQUEST TO QUITCLAIM A PORTION OF A SIXTEEN FOOT WATER
EASEMENT, AND A PORTION OF A SIXTEEN FOOT SEWER EASEMENT
ACROSS THE PROPERTY OF KATHERMAN INVESTMENTS, INC.
el
Chegterfield County' Department of Utilities
1 I~cl ecl~a~ 66EJST
0OO3.03
104
/ II
I
!
I
!
!
!
Ii
II
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Page I of I
Meetin~l Date: January 28, 2004
Item Number: 8.C.8.
Subiect: State Road Acceptance
County Administrator's Comments:
County Administrator:
Board Action Requeste~.
Summary of Information:
Matoaca:
Ashbrook, Section 12
The Village at Swift Creek, Phases I and II
Cameron Bay, Section A
Foxfire, Section 5
Hampton Park, Section 10
Hampton Park, Section 13
Hampton Park, Section 15
Summer Lake, Section 1
Clover Hill and Matoaca:
N Woolridge Rd and Watermill Pkwy
Preparer: Richard M. McElfish
Title: Director, Environmental Engineering
Attachments:
Yes
[--~ No
TO: Board of Supervisors
FROM: Department of Environmental Engineering
SUBJECT: State Road Acceptance- ASHBROOK, SEC 12
DISTRICT: MATOACA
MEETING DATE: 28 January 2004
ROADS FOR CONSIDERATION:
TWISTED CEDAR CT
TWISTED CEDAR DR
TWISTED CEDAR PL
WILLOW WALK DR
WINDING ASH CT
WINDING ASH DR
Vicinity Map: ASHBROOK, SEC 12
000:I.07
TO: Board of Supervisors
FROM: Department of Environmental Engineering
SUBJECT: State Road Acceptance - The Village at Swift Creek Phases I and II
DISTRICT: MATOACA
MEETING DATE: 28 January 2004
ROADS FOR CONSIDERATION:
BRAD MCNEER PKVVY
CRAIG RATH BLVD
Vicinity Map: Brad McNeer Pkwy
~°4,~
1. LOWERY BLUFF WAY
2. CROWNE RIDGE LOOP
Produced By Chesterfield County GIS
000108
TO: Board of Supervisors
FROM: Department of Environmental Engineering
SUBJECT: State Road Acceptance- CAMERON BAY, SEC A
DISTRICT: MATOACA
MEETING DATE: 28 January 2004
ROADS FOR CONSIDERATION:
CAMERON BAY DR
CAMERON BRIDGE CT
CAMERON BRIDGE DR
CAMERON BRIDGE PL
Vicinity Map: CAMERON BAY SEC A
000109
TO: Board of Supervisors
FROM: Department of Environmental Engineering
SUBJECT: State Road Acceptance - FOXFIRE, SEC. 5
DISTRICT: MATOACA
MEETING DATE: 28 January 2004
ROADS FOR CONSIDERATION:
FIRE LIGHT PL
FIRE LIGHT TER
Vicinity Map: FOXFIRE, SEC. 5
pL.
oOoj. .o
TO: Board of Supervisors
FROM: Department of Environmental Engineering
SUBJECT: State Road Acceptance- HAMPTON PARK, SEC. 10
DISTRICT: MATOACA
MEETING DATE: 28 January 2004
ROADS FOR CONSIDERATION:
HAMPTON MEADOWS COVE
HAMPTON MEADOWS TER
Vicinity Map: HAMPTON PARK, SEC. 10
000111
TO: Board of Supervisors
FROM: Department of Environmental Engineering
SUBJECT: State Road Acceptance- HAMPTON PARK, SEC. 13
DISTRICT: MATOACA
MEETING DATE: 28 January 2004
ROADS FOR CONSIDERATION:
HAMPTON COLONY CT
HAMPTON COLONY WAY
HAMPTON SPRINGS RD
Vicinity Map: HAMPTON PARK, SEC. 13
TO: Board of Supervisors
FROM: Department of Environmental Engineering
SUBJECT: State Road Acceptance - HAMPTON PARK, SEC. 15
DISTRICT: MATOACA
MEETING DATE: 28 January 2004
ROADS FOR CONSIDERATION:
HAMPTON BLUFF TER
HAMPTON BLUFF TRL
HAMPTON GREEN DR
Vicinity Map: HAMPTON PARK, SEC. 15
000118
TO: Board of Supervisors
FROM: Department of Environmental Engineering
SUBJECT: State Road Acceptance - SUMMER LAKE, SEC 1
DISTRICT: MATOACA
MEETING DATE: 28 January 2004
ROADS FOR CONSIDERATION:
JAYDEE DR
JAYDEE PL
LAKE SUMMER CT
LAKE SUMMER DR
LAKE SUMMER PL
LAKE SUMMER TER
LAKE SUMMER TURN
STARLEE CT
STARLEE DR
Vicinity Map: SUMMER LAKE, SEC 1
OO0114
TO: Board of Supervisors
FROM: Department of Environmental Engineering
SUBJECT: State Road Acceptance - N Woolridge Rd, Watermill Pkwy
DISTRICT: CLOVER HILL, MATOACA
MEETING DATE: 28 January 2004
ROADS FOR CONSIDERATION:
N WOOLRIDGE RD
WATERMILL PKWY
Vicinity Map: N Woolridge Rd, Watermill Pkwy
4 BILLSTONE PL ,~,~'~ / ~ ~ /-~
COVE RIDGE PL ~T
000115
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Page I of I
Meetin~l Date: January28, 2004
Item Number: 8.C.9.
Subiect:
Request Permission for an Asphalt Driveway and a Wooden Retaining
Wall to Encroach Within a Sixteen-Foot Drainage Easement Across Lot
14, Bayhill Pointe, Section 13
County Administrator's Comments:
County Administrator:
Board Action Requested: Grant Christopher S. Leitch and Michelle D. Leitch
permission for an asphalt driveway and a wooden retaining wall to encroach
within a sixteen foot drainage easement across Lot 14, Bayhill Pointe,
Section 13, subject to the execution of a license agreement.
Summary of Information:
Christopher S. Leitch and Michelle D. Leitch have requested permission for an
asphalt driveway and wooden retaining wall to encroach within a 16' drainage
easement across Lot 14, Bayhill Pointe, Section 13. This request has been
reviewed by staff and approval is recommended.
District: Matoaca
Preparer: John W. Harmon
Title: Ri.qht of Way Mana.qer
Attachments:
¥CS
----] No
000116
VICINITY SKETCH
REQUEST PERMISSION FOR AN ASPHALT
DRIVEWAY AND A WOODEN RETAINING WALL
TO ENCROACH WITHIN A 16' DRAINAGE
EASEMENT ACROSS LOT 14, BAYHILL POINTE,
SECTION' 13
N
000117
817781
.~~ CHRISTOPHER S. LEITCH
MICHELLE D. LEITCH
9024 HIDDEN NEST DRIVE
DB. 5498 PG. 102
PIN: 738668953200000
~/'/~-r/./ ..f~,4-,/,-,, ..
Licensed Area
~ ~/"~'2'. ,ii '/o' z'4s£.
PAIK.,oI~'AL 3URI/£)" / ,t/f,iP ,,¢I.-IflWlN~ Z 07'/'¢. SE£Tll~N /$
BAY/-.IILLPOINT£, M,47'OA~A
' ~,.FI£$'/'£RFI£LD £OUNTF, VIR~,INM.
NOTES:
This sur~*ey ~,&o,prepared wltltout
bot~tt Of a cu~ent trite report.
~emen~,:~.~lst't~t are not shown.
~ts property a~peare ~ ~all ~thin
Zone/~ 7'. , ., ~.~ho~ on H~/FIA
Flood ~'~r~ ~tM Rap.
I h.r~by omrtffy that a9 o[ the field
surly ~a~ sho~ h~reon th~ current
fl~d su~ey"~ade und~ my supe~lalon
correctly sho~ the relation of buitdi~s
m~ o~er at~cture8 Lo the property,line
or ~e land Indicated hereon; that the
wa~ of sam build~s are plumb and
that there ~e no encro~chmen~ of
adjo~t~ b~idi~s or structures onto
said land. no overlap of buildings or
structures from,said land: that there is
no ~stble e~dence of e~semen~, except
As sho~.
FIELD :SURVEY DATE:
JUzr /1, ~ooJ
TAYLOR & TAYLOR, P.C
POWHATAN, V~RGI~IA 231~
(~04)794--7706
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Page I of I
Meetin~l Date: January 28, 2004
Item Number: 8.C.10.
Subject:
Execute the Special Project Service Agreement First Addendum for Residential
Recycling Services with the Central Virginia Waste Management Authority
(CVWMA) to Extend the Contract with Tidewater Fibre Corporation for
Residential Recycling Services for Chesterfield County Through June 30, 2009
County Administrator's Comments:
County Administrator: (~
Board Action Requested: Authorize the County Administrator to sign the Special
Project Service Agreement First Addendum with the Central Virginia Waste
Management Authority (CVWMA) to extend the contract with Tidewater Fibre
Corporation for residential recycling services for Chesterfield County
through June 30, 2009.
Summary of Information
The term of this addendum is the final allowable extension to the Special
Project Service Agreement for residential curbside recycling. This Agreement
shall be effective beginning on July 1, 2004 and ending on June 30, 2009.
Preparer: Francis M. Pitaro
Attachments:
Yes ~ No
Title: Director of General Services
000119
SPECIAL PROJECT SERVICE AGREEMENT HRST ADDENDUM FOR
RESIDENTIAL RECYCLING SERVICES
This ADDENDUM is made by and between the CENTRAL V/RG~ WASTE MANAGEMENT
AUTHORITY (hereinafter designated "CVWMA"), its successors and assigns, having its principal place of
business at 2100 West Labumum Avenue, Suite 105, Richmond, Virginia 23227; and (if executed on the
appropriate page 3 - end - signature page of this agreement).
TOWN OF ASHLAND (ASH),
COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD (CHE),
COUNTY OF GOOCHLAND (GCH),
COUNTY OF HENRICO (I-IEN),
CITY OF COLONIAL HEIGHTS (COL),
CITY OF RICHMOND (RIC)
(Hereinafter designated, collectively, "Participating Local Jurisdictions").
1) Replace Article I - Purpose with the following:
ARTICI,E I - PIIRPOSE
A. The parties have entered into this Addendum pursuant to the authority of the
Virginia Water and Waste Authorities Act (Tile 15.2, Chapter 51 of the Code of Virginia, 1950 as
amended), and the Articles of Incorporation of the CVWMA. Its purpose is to extend the term of
the agreement and revise the terms of the special project for Residential Recycling Service within
the Participating Local Jurisdictions as authorized by Section 11 of the Articles.
B. The Participating Local Jurisdictions agree to participate in the Special Project
according t o t he terms and conditions o f t his Agreement. The Participating Local Jurisdictions
further agree that this Addendum to the Service Agreement shall take effect in each Participating
Locality upon execution and remm of a signed copy of this Addendum to the Service Agreement to
the CVWMA
2)
C. The parties agree that the CVWMA will implement Residential Recycling Services
in accordance with the Residential Recycling Service Contract and Addenda (hereinafter "Service
Contract") between Tidewater Fibre Corporation, Inc. (hereinafter "Contractor") and the CVWMA,
fully executed on November 24, 2003, and effective July 1, 2004.
Replace Article III - Term of Agreement with the following:
ARTICI,E 111 - TERM OF AGREEMENT
The term for this addendum is the final allowable extension to the Service Contract. This
Agreement shall be effective and run concurrently with the Service Contract for a term of five (5)
years beginning on July 1, 2004 and ending on June 30, 2009.
000 .20
SPECIAL PROJECT SERVICE AGREEMENT FOR RESDENTIAL RECYCLING SERVICES Page 1
3) Add to Article VI - Public Awareness and Education Program the following:
4)
F. Public education regarding curbside recycling remains a key component of this
and any successful regional program. The CVWMA will invite a representative from each
participating local jurisdiction to work in concert with the CVWMA staff to develop an
educational program that promotes the regional benefits of the curbside recycling program while
emphasizing the unique issues of each participating jurisdiction. The curbside recycling
educational committee will meet quarterly to coordinate upcoming campaigns and establish
priorities that address specific community needs.
Replace Article VIII - Service Fees Paragraph A. with the following:
ARTICLE VIII - SERVICE FEES
A. The participating Local Jurisdictions shall pay CVWMA for services provided
pursuant to this Agreement as summarized below. The Local Jurisdictions agree to pay any
service fee adjustments approved by the CVWMA, which are required under the Service
Contract implementing this Agreement, or contained in the Agreement, which are applied to all
Participating Local Jurisdictions. Each Participating Local Jurisdiction agrees to pay any service
fee adjustments approved by the CVWMA that result in service implemented in each individual
Participating Local Jurisdiction.
Service Fee
18-gallon Recycling Container
and Delivery Fee, infill and areas
less than 300 dwelling units
18-gallon Recycling Container
and Delivery Fee, areas of 300 or
more new Dwelling units
CVWMA Public Education
Assessment
CVWMA Customer Service
Assessment
Bi-Weekly Service
$1.276
$ 9.00
$ 8.00
$ 0.075 per Dwelling Unit
per month
$ 0.06 per Dwelling Unit
)er month
Weekly Service
$ 2.012
$ 9.00
$ 8.00
$ 0.075 per Dwelling Unit
per month
$ 0.06 per Dwelling Unit
0er month
Adjustments to all Fees and Assessment shall be made annually on July 1 of each year, beginning
on July 1, 2004, based on the increase in the CPI-U for the previous twelve months ending March
31st immediately preceding the anniversary of the Service Contract's effective date. Annual
increases shall not exceed five (5) percent of the previous year's service fees and assessments.
000121
SPECIAL PROJECT SERVICE AGREEMENT FOR RESIDENTIAL RECYCLING SERVICES Page 2
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the CVWMA and the Participating Local Jurisdictions have
caused this Agreement to be executed.
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
McCandlish Holton, P.C.
CENTRAL VIRGINIA
WASTE MANAGEMENT AUTHORITY
E~,edutive Director
Date:
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD
Steven L. Micas
County Attorney
By:
Lane B. Ramsey
County Administrator
Date:
SPECIAL PROJECT SERVICE AGREEMENT FOR RESIDENTIAL RECYCLING SERVICES
3 - CHE - Signature - End
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the CVWMA and the Participating Local Jurisdictions have
caused this Agreement to be executed.
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
McCandlish Holton, P.C.
CENTRAL VIRGINIA
WASTE MANAGEMENT AUTHORITY
~ecutive Director
Date:
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD
Steven L. Micas
County Attorney
By:
Lane B. Ramsey
County Administrator
Date:
000 23
SPECIAL PROJECT SERVICE AGREEMENT FOR RESIDENTIAL RECYCLING SERVICES
3 - CHE - Signature - End
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Page I of I
Meetin~ Date: January 28, 2004
Item Number: 8.C.11.
Subject:
Approval of $123,029 for the Industrial Development Authority to fund the
Acquisition of 9 Acres for the Extension of Meadowville Road and the
Meadowville Technology Park and Authorize the Transfer of $50,000 from the
Industrial Access Road Account
County Administrator's Comments:
County Administrator:
Board Action Requested:
The Board is requested to Authorize $123,029 for the Industrial Development
Authority for the acquisition of Approximately 9 Acres at the Meadowville
Technology Park from H. Gordon Peters and Authorize the Transfer of $50,000
from the Industrial Access Road Account
Summary of Information:
The Industrial Development Authority ("IDA") entered into an exclusive option
agreement dated January 14, 1998 with H. Gordon Peters for the acquisition of
approximately 34 acres of land within the Meadowville Technology Park. The
IDA has agreed to purchase approximately nine (9) acres of property for a
purchase price of approximately $123,029. The property is located south of
Meadowville Road. Four (4) acres are required for road right of way for the
extension of Meadowville Road. The IDA will convey the right of way to the
County after it is acquired. Five (5) acres of the property will be used to
develop industrial sites in conformance with the master plan for the
Meadowville Technology Park.
The IDA's purchase of the property is contingent upon receipt of sufficient
funds from the County. Funding of the $123,029 is available for this use. A
transfer of $50,000 is requested from the Industrial Road Access Account
which will be combined with $73,029 in FY04 budgeted funds for economic
development activities.
Preparer:
James G. Dunn
Title: Director, Economic Development
0623:64076.1
Attachments:
Yes
No
0002 4
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Page I of I
Meetin~l Date: January 28, 2004
Item Number: 8.C.12.
Subiect:
Transfer of Funds to Bermuda District Improvement Fund
County Administrator's Comments:
County Administrator:
Board Action Requested:
The Board is requested to transfer $5,000 each from the Clover Hill, Dale,
Matoaca and Midlothian District Improvement Funds.
Summary of Information:
The balance in the Bermuda District Improvement Fund was depleted by the end
of December 2003. The Board is requested to transfer $5,000 each (total of
$20,000) from the Clover Hill, Dale, Matoaca and Midlothian District
Improvement Funds to replenish the Bermuda District Improvement Fund for the
remainder of FY2004. It is anticipated that the FY2005 budget will include
$48,500 in District Improvement Funds for each magisterial district, which
represents level funding over FY2004.
For information regarding available balances in the District Improvement Fund
accounts, please reference the District Improvement Fund Report.
Preparer: Rebecca T. Dickson
Attachments: ~--] Yes
Title: Director of Budget and Management
No
000 25
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Page I of 2
Meetin~l Date: January 28, 2004 Item Number: 10.A.
Subiect: Developer Water and Sewer Contracts
County Administrator's Comments:
County Administrator: ~
Board Action Requested: The Board of Supervisors has authorized the County
Administrator to execute water and/or sewer contracts between County and
Developer where there are no County funds involved.
The report is submitted to Board members as information.
Summary of Information:
The following water and sewer contracts were executed by the County
Administrator:
Contract Number:
Project Name:
Developer:
01-0225
Newby's Mill and General
Roslyn Development Corporation
Contractor:
Contract Amount:
Lyttle Utilities, Incorporated
Water Improvements -
Wastewater Improvements -
$81,813.25
$85,564.50
District:
Dale
Preparer:
Craig S. Bryant
Title:
Director of Utilities
Attachments:
-'~ Yes
No
)00126
Agenda Item
January 28, 2004
Page 2
Contract Number:
Project Name:
Developer:
Contractor:
Contract Amount:
District:
01-0303
Cloverhill Marketplace Phase I
Cloverhill Development Company, LLC
McLane Construction Company
Water Improvements -
Wastewater Improvements -
Matoaca
$174,680.00
$50,511.00
Contract Number:
Project Name:
Developer:
Contractor:
Contract Amount:
District:
02-0123
Brynmore
R. C. S. Development Corporation
Bookman Construction Company
Water Improvements -
Wastewater Improvements -
Bermuda
$66,305.00
$101,081.00
Contract Number:
Project Name:
Developer:
Contractor:
Contract Amount:
District:
03-0162
Commonwealth Centre - Shooters Hockey Rink
Carr, LLC
J. R. Anderson, Incorporated
Water Improvements -
Wastewater Improvements -
Matoaca
$40,338.00
$21,456.00
000127
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Page 1 of I
Meetin~l Date: January 28, 2004
Item Number: 10.B.
Subject:
Status of General Fund Balance, Reserve for Future Capital Projects,
District Improvement Fund, and Lease Purchases
County Administrator's Comments:
Summary of Information:
Preparer:
Lane B. Ramsey
Title: County Administrator
Attachments:
Yes ~ No
~00128
BOARD
MEETING
DATE
07/01/03
11/25/03
11/25/03
11/25/03
11/25/03
11/25/03
11/25/03
11/25/03
11/25/03
11/25/03
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
GENERAL FUND BALANCE
January 28, 2004
DESCRIPTION
FY2004 Budgeted Beginning Fund Balance
Designate excess revenue (County) for non-recurring items
in FY2005
Designate excess expenditures (County) for non-recurring
items in FY2005
Designate excess expenditures (Schools) for non-recurring
items in FY2005
Designate excess expenditures (Schools) for non-recurring
items in FY2004
FY03 Results of Operations - Police for use in FY2004
FY03 Results of Operations - Fire for use in FY2004
FY2004
FY03 Results of Operations - MI-I/MR/SA for use in
FY2004
FY03 Results of Operations - Projected CSA Shortfall for
use in FY2004
AMOUNT
(102,908)
(3,133,048)
(456,699)
(349,922)
(100,000)
(100,000)
(100,000)
(43,000)
(156,000)
BALANCE
$42,264,186
$42,161,278
$39,028,230
$38,678,308
$38,221,609
$38,121,609
$38,021,609
$37,921,609
$37,878,609
$37,722,609
000 . 9
Board
Meeting
Date
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
RESERVE FOR FUTURE CAP1TAL PROJECTS
TRADITIONALLY FUNDED BY DEBT
January 28, 2004
Description
FOR FISCAL YEAR 2002 BEGINNING JULY 1, 2001
4/4/2001 FY02 Budgeted Addition
4/4/2001 FY02 Capital Projects
7/25/2001 County's Master Plan Update
9/26/2001 Video equipment for Circuit and General District
Courts
10/24/2001 360 West Corridor Plan
11/14/2001 Building Improvements (County Administration)
11/14/2001 Security Enhancements (MI-I/MR and County
Administration)
2/27/2002 Consultant study to develop revitalization/
development strategy for the Cloverleaf Mall Area
4/24/2002 Settlement of the Route 10 widening condemnation
lawsuit with Heritage Chevrolet
4/24/2002 Government Center Parkway Project - partial funding
($1.25 million project)
FOR FISCAL YEAR 2003 BEGINNING JULY 1, 2002
4/10/2002 FY03 Budgeted Addition
4/10/2002 FY03 Capital Projects
8/28/2002 Purchase land for athletic facilities at Spring Run
Elementary School, closing costs, and environmental
assessment
FOR FISCAL YEAR 2004 BEGINNING JULY 1, 2003
4/9/2003 FY04 Budgeted Addition
4/9/2003 FY04 Capital Projects
7/23/2003 National search for a developer to revitalize the
Cloverleaf Mall area
10/8/2003 Debris pick-up program due to Hurricane Isabelle
Amount
8,800,000
(7,579,700)
(85,000)
(90,000)
(70,000)
(170,000)
(107,000)
(50,000)
(250,000)
(75,000)
8,600,000
(7,277,800)
(140,000)
9,354,000
(8,559,300)
(44,OOO)
(1,000,000)
Balance
9,988,012
2,408,312
2,323,312
2,233,312
2,163,312
1,993,312
1,886,312
1,836,312
1,586,312
1,511,312
10,111,312
2,833,512
2,693,512
12,047,512
3,488,212
3,444,212
2,444,212
000 .30
000131
Prepared by
Accounting Department
December 31, 2003
SCHEDULE OF CAPITALIZED LEASE PURCHASES
Date
Began
04/99
06/99
1/01
03/01
04/01
11/00
09/01
03/O3
APPROVED AND EXECUTED
Description
Public Facility Lease - Juvenile Courts Project
School Copier Lease #1 - Manchester High School
Certificates of Participation -
Building Construction, Expansion and Renovation;
Acquisition/Installation of Systems
Telephone System Upgrade
School Copier Lease #2 - Manchester High School
School Copier Lease #3 - Chester Middle School
School Server Lease
Certificates of Participation - Building
Construction, Expansion and Renovation
TOTAL APPROVED
AND EXECUTED
Original
Amount
$16,100,000
43,587
13,725,000
1,222,411
20,268
20,268
278,372
6,100,000
$37,509,906
Date
Ends
11/19
05/04
11/21
03/05
03/06
09/05
07/05
11/23
Outstanding
Balance
12/31/03
$12,880,000
4,333
11,885,000
232,795
10,311
8,206
113,886
6,100,000
$31,234,531
PENDING EXECUTION
Description
None
Approved
Amount
000:1.32
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Page I of I
Meetin~ Date: January 28, 2004
Item Number: 10.c.
Subiect:
Roads Accepted into the State Secondary System
County Administrator's Comments:
Summary of Information:
Preparer: Lisa H. Elko
Title: Clerk to the Board
Attachments:
Ycs
-~No
000~.33
0 0 0
~00i37
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Page I of I
Meetin~l Date: January 28, 2004
Item Number: 10.D.
Subject:
Closed Session
County Administrator's Comments:
County Administrator:
Board Action Requested:
Summary of Information:
Closed session pursuant to § 2.2-3711(A) (7), Code of Virqinia, 1950, as
amended, for consultation with legal counsel pertaining to actual litigation
in the case of Amanda Padula Wilson, et al. v. Board of Supervisors of
Chesterfield County.
Preparer:
Steven L. Micas
Title: County Attorney
0800:64160.1
Attachments:
~]Yes
No
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Page I of I
Meetin~l Date: January 28, 2004
Item Number: 2.B.
Subiect:
County Administrator's Comments
County Administrator's Comments:
County Administrator:
Board Action Requested:
Summary of Information:
Mr. Horace Mann, Colonel, U.S. Army (Retired), President, Chesterfield
Historical Society would like to present the Board of Supervisors with a
copy of "Chesterfield an 01d Virginia County."
Preparer: Lisa Elko
Title: Clerk to the Board
Attachments:
Yes
No
)00001
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page I of 1
~ AGENDA
Meetin~l Date: January 28, 2004 Item Number: 18.
Subiect:
Adjournment and Notice of Next Scheduled Meeting of the Board
of Supervisors
County Administrator's Comments:
County Administrator:
Board Action Requested:
Summary of Information:
Motion of adjournment and notice of a regularly scheduled meeting to be
held on February 11, 2004 at 3:30 p.m.
Preparer: Lisa H. Elko Title: Clerk to the Board
Attachments: --lYes 1No #
O001~t