12-17-2003 MinutesBOARD OF SUPERVISORS
MINUTES
December 17, 2003
Supervisors in Attendances
Mr. Arthur S. Warren, Chairman
Mr. J. L. McHale, III, Vice Chrm.
Mr. Edward B. Barber
Mrs. Renny B. Humphrey
Mr. Kelly E. Miller
Mr. Lane B. Ramsey
County Administrator
Staff in Attendances
Colonel Carl R. Baker,
Police Department
Mr. George Braunstein,
Exec. Dir., Community
Services Board
Mr. Craig Bryant, Dir.,
Utilities
Ms Jana Carter, Dir.,
Youth Services
Ms Marilyn Cole, Asst.
County Administrator
Mr Richard Cordle,
Treasurer
Ms Rebecca Dickson, Dir.,
Budget and Management
Mr James Dunn, Dir.,
Economic Development
Mr William Dupler,
Building Official
Mr Robert Eanes, Asst. to
the County Administrator
Ms Lisa Elko, CMC
Clerk
Chief Stephen A. Elswick,
Fire Department
Ms. Karla Gerner, Dir.,
Human Resource Mgmt.
Mr. Michael Golden, Dir.,
Parks and Recreation
Mr. Bradford S. Hammer,
Deputy Co. Admin.,
Human Services
Mr. John W. Harmon,
Right-of-Way Manager
Mr. Russell Harris, Mgr.
of Community Development
Services
Mr Thomas E. Jacobson,
Dir., Planning
Mr H. Edward James,
Dir., Purchasing
Mr Donald Kappel, Dir.,
Public Affairs
Mr Louis Lassiter, Dir.,
Internal Audit
Mr Michael Likins,
Coop. Extension Director
Mr Mike Mabe, Dir.,
Libraries
Mr R. John McCracken,
Dir., Transportation
Mr. Richard M. McElfish,
Dir., Env. Engineering
03-1012
12/17/03
Mr. Steven L. Micas,
County Attorney
Mr. Glen Peterson, Dir.,
Community Diversion
Incentive Program
Mr. Francis Pitaro, Dir.,
General Services
Ms. Karen Russell, Dir.,
Risk Management
Mr. James J. L. Stegmaier,
Deputy Co. Admin.,
Management Services
Mr. M. D. Stith, Jr.,
Deputy Co. Admin.,
Community Development
Mr. Thomas Taylor, Dir.,
Block Grant Office
Mr. Warren called the regularly scheduled meeting to order at
3:37 p.m.
1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES FOR NOVEMBER 25, 2003
On motion of Mrs.i Humghrey, seconded by Mr. McHale, the Board
approved the minutes of November 25, 2003, as submitted.
Ayes: Warren, McHale, Barber, Humphrey and Miller.
Nays: None.
2. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS
Mr. Ramsey stated Congressman Randy Forbes recently
provided him with a copy of the remarks he made on July
25, 2003 to the House of Representatives recognizing
Chesterfield County's continuing support of its military
reservists.
Ms. Elko read the Congressional Record of the following
remarks made by Congressman Randy Forbes:
"Mr. Speaker, I rise today to recognize Chesterfield
County, Virginia for their continuing support of our men
and women in uniform.
Chesterfield County rests between the James and
Appomattox Rivers and is a total of 446 square miles.
Its location offers a unique blend of suburbia and the
options of driving to our nation's capital, Virginia's
beautiful beaches or the scenic Blue Ridge Parkway.
The citizens of Chesterfield County not only share a
beautiful community filled with spirit and values. They
also share a sense of honor, duty and commitment through
their support of Virginia's reservists.
It came to my attention in February 2003 that
Chesterfield made a commitment to those working for the
County - a promise to compensate those called up for
duty as part of the Reserves. When a reservist is
mobilized, land leaves his or her civilian job, their
03-1013
12/17/03
o
military salary is almost always much lower than their
civilian salary.
Prior to the war in Iraq, there was an effort by
military organizations to get the word out to their
members that might be asked to serve in the war - the
word was 'save up now to help your family in the
future.' But, often, the small amount of time between
hearing of a possible call-up of your unit, and
preparing to leave is not enough to organize family
finances. Families of those called to serve at a
moment's notice often find themselves in a dire
financial situation.
The citizens of Chesterfield wanted to take care of the
53 Reservists and their families. Together, in a
community-wide effort, the county decided to make up the
difference in salary for the reservists who had been
asked to serve in support of Iraqi Freedom. I can't
think of a better way to honor our men and women in
uniform, who sacrifice so much in the name of freedom.
Mr. Speaker, I congratulate Chesterfield County as they
share in the duty of those serving our country. Most of
us only speak of helping the troops fighting for freedom
each day, the people of Chesterfield County translated
those words into actions. As a member of the House
Armed Services Committee, and as a citizen of this great
nation, it is an honor and a privilege to represent the
people of Chesterfield County, true patriots of our
country."
Ms. Carolyn Cios, Powhatan County Administrator,
expressed appreciation to the Board for allowing
Powhatan to use Mr. Kirk Turner, Development Manager for
Chesterfield County, as Powhatan County's Interim
Planning Director.
Mr. Roy Harrison, member of the Powhatan County Board of
Supervisors, presented a framed plaque to Mr. Turner in
appreciation of the expertise he provided as Interim
Planning Director in Powhatan County.
3. BOARD CO~4ITTEE R~PORTS
There were no Board committee reports at this time.
REQUESTS TO POSTPONE ACTION, ADDITIONS, OR CHANGES IN
ORDER OF PRESENTATION
On motion of Mr. McHale, seconded by Mr. Warren, the Board
added Item 5.F., Resolution Recognizing the Outstanding
Contributions of the Commonwealth Clinic; replaced Item
8.C.l.c., Resolution to Approve the Financing of the
Acquisition, Construction, Installation, Furnishing and
Equipping of Capital Improvement Projects; added Item
8.C.4.b., Set Date for Public Hearing to Consider Increasing
the Appropriation of Anticipated Reimbursements for Hurricane
Isabel Debris Pick-up Program; added Item 8.C.4.c., Set Date
for Public Hearing to Consider the Exercise of Eminent Domain
for the Acquisition of Permanent and Temporary Construction
03-1014
12/17/03
Easements for the Ruffin Mill-Phase II Waterline Project;
added Item 8.C.6.b.1., Transfer of District Improvement Funds
from the Bermuda District Improvement Fund to the
Chesterfield Public Library to Purchase Books on Compact
Discs for the Chester/Enon Library; added Item 8.C.6.b.2.,
Transfer of District Improvement Funds from the Bermuda
District Improvement Fund to the Chesterfield County Fire
Department to Upgrade the Exercise Facilities at the Dutch
Gap Station; added Item 8.C.6.b.3., Transfer of District
Improvement FundS from the Bermuda District Improvement Fund
to the Chesterfield County School Board to Purchase ~The
Educational Enrichment Package" for Six Chesterfield County
High Schools; replaced Item 10.B., Report on the Status of
the General Fund Balance, Reserve for Future Capital
Projects, DistriCt Improvement Funds, and Lease Purchases;
moved Item 15.C , Resolution Recognizing Mrs. Dorothy K.
Jaeckle for Her Contributions to the Chesterfield County
Committee on the Future, to follow Item 5.D., Resolution
Recognizing Lieutenant Thomas E. Stiles, Police Department,
Upon His Retirement; and adopted the Agenda, as amended.
Ayes: Warren, McHale, Barber, Humphrey and Miller.
Nays: None.
Mr. Warren recognized Mr. Harry Daniel, former member of the
Board of SuperviSors, who was present at the meeting.
5. RESOLUTIONS AND SPECIAL RECOGNITIONS
RECO~NIZIN~ CHESTERFIELD COUNTY EMPLOYEES OF THE YEAR
Ms. Cole introduCed the 2003 Employees-of-the-Year, who were
as follows:
Name
Ann Arnold
Janice Blakley
Patsy Brown
Sarah Bodsforth
Chris Bugg
Sherry Brown
Judy Burnett
Alesia Rae Campbell
Brian Dalton
Faith Davis
Keith Diggs
William Ellis
Dicky Fenner
Department
Extension Service
Administration
Accounting
Youth Services
Real Estate Assessment
Human Resource Management
Purchasing
General Services
Environmental Engineering
Risk Management
Fire Training
Emergency Communications
Utilities
03-1015
12/17/03
Laura Glovier
Michelle Gunter
Richard Jones, III
Claudia Lawler
Milton Marsh
Lisa Park
Zackary Robbins
Rose Stanford
Bruce Stokes
Kevin Sutton
Benjamin Thomas
Tammi Tomlinson
Cindy Vaughan
Mike Westfall
Tammy Wiley
David Williams
Susan Wilson
Treasurer
Sheriff
Building Inspections
Mental Health
Parks and Recreation
Health Department
Planning
Community Corrections
Juvenile Detention
Juvenile Probation
Library
Budget and Management
Youth Group Home
Internal Audit
Information Systems Technology
Police Department
County Attorney
Mr. Ramsey presented the Employees-of-the-Year with a plaque
recognizing them as their department's Employee-of-the-Year
and expressed appreciation for their leadership and
dedication.
Mr. McHale expressed appreciation, on behalf of the Board and
the citizens, to each of the Employees-of-the-Year for their
dedicated service.
A standing ovation followed.
5.B. RECOGNIZING AIM-USA FOR A DONATION TOWARDS TH~ 2003
FOURTH OF JULY CELEBRATION SPONSORED BY CHESTERFIELD
COUNTY PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT
Mr. Golden introduced Mr. Jim Johnson and Mrs. Susan Johnson
who were present to receive the resolution.
On motion of the Board, the following resolution was adopted:
WHEREAS, AIM USA provided a generous donation which was
used by the Chesterfield County Parks and Recreation
Department towards the 2003 Fourth of July Celebration; and
WHEREAS, the donation aided in the enhancement of the
Fourth of July Celebration; and
03-1016
12/17/03
WHEREAS, AIM-USA has given back to the community through
sponsorship of a major county special event; and
WHEREAS, through the cooperative efforts of Mr. Jim
Johnson and Mrs. Susan Johnson, the spirit of
community/private partnerships has provided the Department
with increased aWareness to explore similar opportunities for
other programs; and
WHEREAS, Chesterfield County greatly appreciates this
donation and isl looking forward to continuing a strong
relationship with AIM-USA.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Chesterfield
County Board of Supervisors, this 17th day of December 2003,
publicly recognizes AIM-USA and expresses appreciation for
its generous contribution toward the Annual Fourth of July
Celebration.
AND, BE ITl FURTHER RESOLVED, that a copy of this
resolution be presented to AIM-USA and that this resolution
be permanently recorded among the papers of this Board of
Supervisors of Chesterfield County, Virginia.
Ayes: Warren, McHale, Barber, Humphrey and Miller.
Nays: None.
Mr. McHale presented the executed resolution to Mr. and Mrs.
Johnson, accompanied by their infant daughter, Mr. Golden and
Mr. Dave Caras, and expressed appreciation for AIM-USA's
generous contribution.
Mr. Johnson expressed appreciation to the Parks and
Recreation Department for the opportunity to help the youth
of Chesterfield County.
5,Co
RECOGNIZING COMCAST CABLEVISION FOR A DONATION TOWARDS
THE 2003 FOURTH OF JULY CELEBRATION SPONSORED BY
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT
Mr. Golden introduced Mr. Kenneth Dye who was present to
receive the resolution.
On motion of the Board, the following resolution was adopted:
WHEREAS, Comcast Cablevision provided a generous
donation which was used by the Chesterfield County Parks and
Recreation Department for the 2003 Fourth of July
Celebration; and
WHEREAS, thle donation aided in the enhancement of the
Fourth of July Celebration; and
WHEREAS, Comcast Cablevision has given back to the
community through sponsorship of a major county special
event; and
WHEREAS, through the cooperative efforts of Mr. Kenneth
M. Dye, Director of Government Affairs, the spirit of
community/private partnerships has provided the Department
with increased awareness to explore similar opportunities for
other programs; and
03-1017
12/17/03
WHEREAS, Chesterfield County greatly appreciates this
donation and is looking forward to continuing a strong
relationship with Comcast Cablevision.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Chesterfield
County Board of Supervisors, this 17tn day of December 2003
publicly recognizes Comcast Cablevision for its generous
contribution toward the Annual Fourth of July Celebration.
AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that a copy of this
resolution be presented to Comcast Cablevision and that this
resolution be permanently recorded among the papers of this
Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County, Virginia.
Ayes: Warren, McHale, Barber, Humphrey and Miller.
Nays: None.
Mr. McHale presented the executed resolution to Mr. Dye,
accompanied by Mr. Golden and Mr. Dave Caras, and expressed
appreciation for Comcast's generous contribution.
Mr. Dye expressed appreciation to the Parks and Recreation
Department for the opportunity to assist with enhancing the
quality of life of county residents.
5.D. RECOGNIZING LIEUTENANT THOMAS E. STILES, POLICE
DEPARTMENT, UPON HIS RETIREMENT
Colonel Baker introduced Lieutenant Thomas Stiles who was
present to receive the resolution.
On motion of the Board, the following resolution was adopted:
WHEREAS, Lieutenant Thomas E. Stiles will retire from
the Chesterfield County Police Department on January 1, 2004
after providing 26 years of quality service to the citizens
of Chesterfield County; and
WHEREAS, Lieutenant Stiles has faithfully served the
county in the capacity of Patrol Officer, Investigator,
Sergeant and Lieutenant; and
WHEREAS, Lieutenant Stiles served as Class President of
the 6th Basic Police Academy; and
WHEREAS, Lieutenant Stiles was involved in numerous
major cases, two of which involved the abduction and assault
of eight and nine-year-old females, one being highlighted on
the national television show Rescue 911 with William Shatner;
and, in the other case, a confession was obtained and the
suspect pled guilty, which also led to the resolution of an
additional abuse situation involving another minor female,
and the suspects arrested in these cases are still serving
prison time; and
WHEREAS, Lieutenant Stiles served on the TQI Weapons
Committee with the purpose of evaluating and selecting a new
service weapon for the Chesterfield County Police Department,
and the weapon selected is currently still issued by the
department; and
03-1018
12/17/03
WHEREAS, during his tenure as Lieutenant, Lieutenant
Stiles has served as Commander of the Vice and Narcotics
Unit, the Crimes Against Persons Unit, the Crimes Against
Property Unit, the Anti-Crime Task Force Unit, and Lieutenant
of the Support Service Unit; and
WHEREAS, Lieutenant Stiles has received numerous letters
of thanks and appreciation for service rendered from the
citizens of Chesterfield County; and
WHEREAS, Lieutenant Stiles has provided the Chesterfield
County Police Department with many years of loyal and
dedicated service; and
WHEREAS, Chesterfield County and the Board of
Supervisors will!miss Lieutenant Stiles' diligent service.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Chesterfield
County Board of Supervisors, this 17th day of December 2003,
publicly recognizes Lieutenant Thomas E. Stiles, and extends
on behalf of its members and the citizens of Chesterfield
County, appreciation for his service to the county,
congratulations Upon his retirement, and best wishes for a
long and happy retirement.
AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that a copy of this
resolution be presented to Lieutenant Stiles, and that this
resolution be permanently recorded among the papers of this
Board of SuperviSors of Chesterfield County.
Ayes: Warren, McHale, Barber, Humphrey and Miller.
Nays: None.
Mr. McHale presented the executed resolution to Lieutenant
Stiles, accompanied by members of his family and Colonel
Baker, expressed~appreciation for his dedicated service, and
wished him a long and happy retirement.
Mr. Ramsey presented Lieutenant Stiles with a Jefferson Cup,
thanked him for his extraordinary efforts on the TQI Weapons
Committee, and offered best wishes upon his retirement.
Lieutenant Stiles expressed appreciation to the Board for the
recognition.
A standing ovatiOn followed.
RECO~NIZIN~ MRS. DOROTHY K. JAECKLE FOR HER
CONTRIBUTIONS TO THE CHESTERFIELD COUNTY COMMITTEE
ON THE FUTURE
Ms. Mary Kruse introduced Ms. Dorothy Jaeckle who was present
to receive the resolution.
On motion of the Board, the following resolution was adopted:
WHEREAS, the Chesterfield County Committee on the Future
was established in 1987 by the Board of Supervisors and
included in the County Charter for the purpose of assessing
the future and long range challenges facing the county,
advising the Board of Supervisors, and making recommendations
for minimizing the adverse effect of future changes on the
county; and
03-1019
12/17/03
WHEREAS, Mrs. Dorothy Jaeckle was appointed as a member
of the Committee in 1992; and
WHEREAS, Mrs. Jaeckle has served the citizens of the
Bermuda District with distinction; and
WHEREAS, Mrs. Jaeckle served as Vice Chairman from
January 1996 through August 1996 and as Chairman of the
Committee from September 1996 through January 2000; and
WHEREAS, the Committee prepared the strategies for
success report on "Economic Development" making specific
recommendations in the areas of strengthening the county's
workforce, planning for growth and development, and preparing
for the residents' needs and their impact on economic
development; and
WHEREAS, the Committee created the "Neighborhood
Preservation" report developing strategies to strengthen
county communities by offering recommendations related to
community organizations, neighborhood schools, community
safety, crime prevention, and the maintenance,
rehabilitation, and design of public and private facilities;
and
WHEREAS, the Committee prepared the "Youth
Development" report creating recommendations to maximize
the opportunity for Chesterfield County youth to become
engaged contributors within their communities through
community, church, and private organizations,
volunteerism, and school involvement; and
WHEREAS, Mrs. Jaeckle served as the Chairman of the
Committee during the development of the "Youth Development"
report; and
WHEREAS, the Committee completed the "Aging of the
Population" report recognizing the opportunities created by
the growing population of senior citizens, acknowledging the
collective community obligation to meet seniors' needs, and
offering suggestions that address the needs and opportunities
of senior citizens in the areas of health, information
services, mobility, education, social and leisure time,
finances and housing; and
WHEREAS, Mrs. Jaeckle has dedicated countless hours to
the Committee during the past twelve years.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Chesterfield
County Board of Supervisors, this 17tn day of December 2003,
publicly recognizes Mrs. Dorothy Jaeckle and commends her for
her dedication and outstanding service to the Committee on
the Future and to the citizens of Chesterfield County.
AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that a copy of this
resolution be presented to Mrs. Jaeckle and that this
resolution be permanently recorded among the papers of this
Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County, Virginia.
Ayes: Warren, McHale, Barber, Humphrey and Miller.
Nays: None.
Mr. McHale presented the executed resolution to Mrs. Jaeckle
and expressed appreciation for her outstanding contributions
to the Committee on the Future.
03-1020
12/17/03
Mrs. Jaeckle expressed appreciation to Mr. McHale for the
opportunity to serve on the Committee on the Future.
5.F. RECO~NIZIN~ THE OUTSTANDING CONTRIBUTIONS OF THE
COMMONWEALTH CLINIC
Mr. Kappel introduced Dr. Don Yeatts, Medical Director of the
Commonwealth Clinic, who was present to receive the
resolution.
On motion of the Board, the fol. lowing resolution was adopted:
WHEREAS, access to medical care is a vital need for all
Americans; and
WHEREAS; the cost of medical care has risen to the point
that some Americans can no longer afford it; and
WHEREAS, the Commonwealth Clinic at 10930 Hull Street
Road in Midlothian opened in April 2003; and
WHEREAS, the Commonwealth Clinic
charitable organization; and
is a non-profit,
WHEREAS, the clinic's patients are uninsured and are
experiencing financial hardship; and
WHEREAS, most of these patients are referred to the
Commonwealth Clinic by the Chesterfield County Health
Department or the Chesterfield-Colonial Heights Department of
Social Services; and
WHEREAS, since April 2003, the Commonwealth Clinic has
seen more than 400 patients; and
WHEREAS, these patients were provided with a wide range
of ~family practitioner" services; and
WHEREAS, these services were provided free-of-charge by
volunteer care providers; and
WHEREAS, since its inception, the Commonwealth Clinic
has had more than 55 volunteers provide nearly 1,300
volunteer hours; and
WHEREAS, these volunteers include nine doctors and nine
nurse practitioners; and
WHEREAS, more than 50 medical specialists in
Chesterfield County have agreed to serve as additional
medical resources at no charge for clinic patients with
special needs; and
WHEREAS, such dedication and voluntarism are deserving
of appropriate public recognition.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Chesterfield
County Board of Supervisors, this 17th day of December 2003,
publicly recognizes the outstanding contributions of the
Commonwealth Clinic to the health and welfare of Chesterfield
County, thanks the doctors, nurse practitioners and others
who donate so generously of their time and talents, and
03-1021
12/17/03
wishes these true American heroes continued success as they
care for the less affluent of our communities.
Ayes: Warren, McHale, Barber, Humphrey and Miller.
Nays: None.
Mr. Warren presented the executed resolution to Dr. Yeatts
and commended the physicians and other health professionals
who volunteer their services at the Commonwealth Clinic.
Dr. Yeatts expressed appreciation to the Board for the
recognition.
Mrs. Humphrey requested that Mr. Stith provide details to Dr.
Yeatts relative to Block Grant funding opportunities
available for the clinic.
6. WORK SESSIONS
There were no work sessions at this time.
7. DEFERRED ITEMS
0 TO CONSIDER THE PROPOSED SUBDIVISION CONNECTIVITY POLICY
Mr. Kirk Turner stated staff is requesting that the Board
defer action on the policy until February 25, 2004 to analyze
language changes to provide additional protection for
existing neighborhoods.
On motion of Mr. McHale, seconded by Mrs. Humphrey, the Board
deferred action on the proposed Subdivision Connectivity
Policy until February 25, 2004.
Ayes: Warren, McHale, Barber, Humphrey and Miller.
Nays: None.
8. NEW BUSINESS
8.A. STREETLIGHT COST APPROVALS
On motion of Mrs. Humphrey, seconded by Mr. Barber, the Board
approved the following streetlights:
Matoaca District
At the intersection of Bethia Road and Winterpock Road
in the vicinity of Saint Gabriel's Catholic Church
Cost to install streetlight: $2,123.91
Midlothian District
In the Banwell Subdivision:
Hedges Road, in the vicinity of 6831
Cost to install streetlight: $701.89
In the Brookwood Estates Subdivision:
Replace the existing 3000 lumen mercury vapor
03-1022
12/17/03
streetlight at the intersection of Huguenot Road
and Westgate Road with the county standard 8000
lumen sodium vapor streetlight
Cost to replace streetlight: $359.88
Ayes: Warren, McHale, Barber, Humphrey and Miller.
Nays: None.
8 · B · APPOINTMENTS
On motion of Mr. McHale, seconded by Mr. Warren, the Board
suspended its rules at this time to allow simultaneous
nomination/appointment/reappointment of members to serve on
the Appomattox River Water Authority, Chesterfield Community
Services Board, and the Personnel Appeals Board.
Ayes: Warren, McHale, Barber, Humphrey and Miller.
Nays: None.
8.B.1. APPOMATTOX RIVER WATER AUTHORITY
On motion of Mrs. Humphrey, seconded by Mr. Warren, the Board
simultaneously nominated/reappointed Mr. Craig Bryant to
serve on the Appomattox River Water Authority, whose term is
effective January 1, 2004 and expires December 31, 2004.
Ayes: Warren, McHale, Barber, Humphrey and Miller.
Nays: None.
On motion of Mrs. Humphrey, seconded by Mr. Warren, the Board
simultaneously nominated/reappointed Mr. Lane Ramsey to serve
on the Appomattox River Water Authority, whose term is
effective January 1, 2004 and expires December 31, 2004.
Ayes: Warren, McHale, Barber, Humphrey and Miller.
Nays: None.
8.B.2. CHESTERFIELD COMMUNITY SERVICES BOARD
On motion of Mr. Barber, seconded by Mr. McHale, the Board
simultaneously nominated/appointed/reappointed Mr. Angel A.
Torres, representing the county at-large, and Ms. Maria
Brown, representing the Midlothian District, to serve on the
Chesterfield Community Services Board, whose terms are
effective January 1, 2004 and expire December 31, 2006.
Ayes: Warren, McHale, Barber, Humphrey and Miller.
Nays: None.
8 · B · 3 . PERSONNEL APPEALS BOARD
On motion of Mrs. Humphrey, seconded by Mr. Barber, the Board
simultaneously nominated/appointed Ms. Teresa Langley Edwards
to serve on the Personnel Appeals Board, whose term is
effective January 1, 2004 and expires December 31, 2006.
Ayes: Warren, McHale, Barber, Humphrey and Miller.
Nays: None.
03-1023
12/17/03
8. C · CONSENT ITEMS
8 . C · 1 . ADOPTION OF RESOLUTIONS
8.C.l.a. RECOGNIZING MI~. DONALD RAY SAUNDERS, INFORMATION
SYSTEMS TECHNOLOGY DEPARTMENT, UPON HIS RETIREMENT
On motion of Mr. Miller, seconded by Mr. McHale, the Board
adopted the following resolution:
WHEREAS, Mr. Donald Ray Saunders will retire from the
Chesterfield County Information Systems Technology (IST)
Department on January 1, 2004; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Saunders began his public service to the
citizens of Chesterfield County on September 19, 1983, as
Systems Analyst III with the Data Processing Department; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Saunders has faithfully served the county
for 20 years and held numerous positions including systems
analyst III; lead analyst programmer; project manager;
systems development manager - finance, and web services
manager; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Saunders was instrumental in the
implementation of the Student Information System, which
provided enhanced school operations and student information;
and
WHEREAS, Mr. Saunders was a leader in various other
projects including the Personal Property Tax Proration
System, Utility Billing System (CUBIS), HR/Payroll System
(Integral), and the Year 2000 Project; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Saunders has received numerous recognitions
including an Organizational and Managerial Communication
Skills award from the University of Richmond, a First Choice
award for serving on a countywide Y2K taskforce, and created
and led the Web Services team to the development and
implementation of Chesterfield's e-government services; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Saunders has received many letters of
commendation and appreciation for his performance and
dedication to his duties; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Saunders served as team leader of the IST
Quality Council; Chair of the Internet Security Advisory
Group; Advisor for the Information Technology Advisory Group;
and member of the State Applications Development Group, the
ERP team, and the CountyNet Redesign Committee; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Saunders has provided the Chesterfield
County Information Systems Technology Department with many
years of loyal and dedicated service and will be tremendously
missed for the quality and caliber of his commitment to the
success of Chesterfield County's IST operations.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Chesterfield
County Board of Supervisors, this 17th day December 2003,
recognizes the contributions of Mr. Donald Ray Saunders,
expresses the appreciation of all residents for his service
03-1024
12/17/03
to the county, and extends appreciation for his dedicated
service and congratulations upon his retirement.
Ayes: Warren, McHale, Barber, Humphrey and Miller.
Nays: None.
8.C.l.b. RECOGNIZING DEPUTY ALEX E. RAINES, JR., SHERIFF'S
OFFICE, UPON HIS RETIREMENT
On motion of Mr. Miller, seconded by Mr. McHale, the Board
adopted the following resolution:
WHEREAS, Mr. Alex E. Raines, Jr. began working for the
Chesterfield County Sheriff's Office on September 27, 1982;
and
WHEREAS, Deputy Raines served in the jail dealing with
inmates entrusted to the Sheriff's care; and
WHEREAS, Deputy Raines was promoted to the rank of
Corporal in 1986, assisting his sergeant with shift
operations; and
WHEREAS, Deputy Raines took a voluntary reduction in
rank in 1989, to help start the Sheriff's Office Inmate
Workforce Program; and
WHEREAS, during his assignment to that unit, Deputy
Raines received several letters of appreciation and
commendation for the work performed by the inmates under his
supervision; and
WHEREAS, Deputy Raines left the Workforce Program in
1995 and returned to the jail, where he served as a primary
control room operator; and
WHEREAS, Deputy Raines will retire January 1, 2004 after
providing 21 years of service to the Sheriff's Office.
NOW, THERFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Chesterfield
County Board of Supervisors recognizes the contributions of
Mr. Alex E. Raines, Jr., expresses the appreciation of all
citizens for his service to Chesterfield County, and extends
appreciation for his service to the county and their
congratulations upon his retirement, as well as their best
wishes for a long and happy retirement.
Ayes: Warren, McHale, Barber, Humphrey and Miller.
Nays: None.
8.C.l.c. APPROVING THE FINANCING OF THE ACQUISITION,
CONSTRUCTION, INSTALLATION, FURNISHING AND
EQUIPPING OF CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
On motion of Mr. Miller, seconded by Mr. McHale, the Board
adopted the following resolution:
RESOLUTION OF THE BOA~) OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY
OF CHESTERFIELD, VIRGINIA, TO APPROVE THE FINANCING
OF THE ACQUISITION, CONSTRUCTION, INSTALLATION,
FURNISHING AND EQUIPPING OF A NEW COM~JNITY
03-1025
12/17/03
DEVELOPMENT BUILDING, A COUNTY JAIL REPLACEMENT, A
FINANCIAL/HUMAN RESOURCES INFORMATION SYSTEM, AN
EMERGENCY SYSTEMS INTEGRATION PROJECT, THE CHESTER
HOUSE REHABILITATIVE FACILITY AND AIRPORT HANGAR
SPACE AT THE CHESTERFIELD COUNTY AIRPORT, THROUGH
THE ISSUANCE AND FROM THE PROCEEDS OF NOT TO EXCEED
$44,560,000 PRINCIPAL AMOUNT OF CERTIFICATES OF
PARTICIPATION EVIDENCING UNDIVIDED INTERESTS IN THE
RENTAL PAYMENTS TO BE MADE BY THE COUNTY, AS LESSEE,
UNDER A LEASE/PURCHASE AGREEMENT, TO AUTHORIZE THE
REIMBURSEMENT FROM THE PROCEEDS OF SUCH CERTIFICATES
OF PARTICIPATION OF EXPENDITURES TO BE MADE BY THE
COUNTY IN ADVANCE OF THE ISSUANCE AND RECEIPT OF THE
PROCEEDS OF SUCH CERTIFICATES OF PARTICIPATION AND
TO AUTHORIZE APPROPRIATIONS TO PAY COSTS OF THE
ACQUISITION, CONSTRUCTION, INSTALLATION, FURNISHING
AND EQUIPPING OF THE CHESTER HOUSE REHABILITATIVE
FACILITY AND AIRPORT HANGAR SPACE AT THE
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY AIRPORT
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY
OF CHESTERFIELD, VIRGINIA, AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. The Board of Supervisors (the "Board of
Supervisors") of the County of Chesterfield, Virginia (the
"County") hereby approves the financing on behalf of the
County of (a) the acquisition, construction, installation,
furnishing and equipping of a new Community Development
Building, (b) the acquisition, construction, installation,
financing and equipping of a County Jail Replacement, (c) the
acquisition and installation of a new Financial/Human
Resource Information System, (d) the acquisition and
installation of a Emergency Systems Integration Project, and
(e) the acquisition, construction, installation, furnishing
and equipping of the Chester House Rehabilitative Facility,
(f) the acquisition, construction, installation, furnishing
and equipping of Airport Hangar Space at the Chesterfield
County Airport (collectively, the ~Projects"), through the
issuance and from the proceeds of an issue of not to exceed
$44,560,000 principal amount of Certificates of
Participation. The Certificates of Participation will
represent undivided interests in the rental payments to be
made by the County, as lessee, under a Lease/Purchase
Agreement pursuant to which the County, as lessee, will lease
the Project. The rental payments to be made by the County
under the Lease/Purchase Agreement will be subject to
appropriation by the Board of Supervisors.
SECTION 2. The Board of Supervisors hereby authorizes
the County to make expenditures on the Projects in advance of
the issuance and receipt of the proceeds of the Certificates
of Participation and to reimburse such expenditures from the
proceeds of the Certificates of Participation. The adoption
of this resolution shall be considered as an ~official
intent" within the meaning of Treasury Regulation Section
1.1.150-2, promulgated under the Internal Revenue Code of
1986, as amended.
SECTION 3. The Board of Supervisors hereby declares its
intent to (a) appropriate the amount of $1,203,100 to pay
costs of acquisition, construction, installation, furnishing
and equipping of the Chester House Rehabilitative Facility
and hereby authorizes the use of such amount to pay costs of
03-1026
12/17/03
the acquisition, construction, installation, furnishing and
equipping of the Chester House Rehabilitative Facility; and
(b) hereby declares its intent to appropriate the amount of
$900,000 to pay costs of acquisition, construction,
installation, furnishing and equipping of Airport Hangar
Space at the Chesterfield County Airport and hereby
authorizes the use of such amount to pay costs of the
acquisition, construction, installation, furnishing and
equipping of Airport Hangar Space at the Chesterfield County
Airport.
SECTION 4.
adoption.
This resolution shall take effect upon its
Ayes: Warren, McHale, Barber, Humphrey and Miller.
Nays: None.
8.C.l.d. RECOGNIZING MS. CAROL LYNN VANDERHERCHEN, PARKS AND
RECREATION DEPARTMENT, UPON HER RETIREMENT
On motion of Mr. Miller, seconded by Mr. McHale, the Board
adopted the following resolution:
WHEREAS, Mrs. Carol Lynn Vanderherchen retired on August
1, 2003 from the Chesterfield County Department of Parks and
Recreation; and
WHEREAS, Mrs. Vanderherchen was employed by the
Chesterfield County Police Department from October 9, 1984
until February 23, 1999; and
WHEREAS, Mrs. Vanderherchen was the original office
administrator for Chesterfield County/Colonial Heights Crime
Solvers; and
WHEREAS, Mrs. Vanderherchen served as secretary for the
Captain of the Chesterfield County Police Department's
Criminal Investigations Division, for the Crimes Against
Property Unit, and for the Major of the Investigations
Bureau; and
WHEREAS, Mrs. Vanderherchen was the recipient of the
Celebrating Success Award in July 1990; and
WHEREAS, Mrs. Vanderherchen received numerous accolades
from the public and private sector during her tenure with the
Chesterfield County Police Department; and
WHEREAS, Mrs. Vanderherchen served with Chesterfield
County Parks and Recreation Department beginning December 13,
1999, and her invaluable service to the Parks and Recreation
Department included active participation as secretary to the
Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission and the Midlothian
Mines and Railroad Foundation; and
WHEREAS, Mrs. Vanderherchen ably served as Secretary to
the Director of Parks and Recreation; and
WHEREAS, Mrs. Vanderherchen served as the United Way
Fund Coordinator for the Parks and Recreation Department.
03-1027
12/17/03
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Chesterfield
County Board of Supervisors recognizes the outstanding
contributions of Mrs. Carol Lynn Vanderherchen, expresses the
appreciation of all residents for her 18 years of service to
Chesterfield County, and extends appreciation for her
dedicated service to the county and congratulations upon her
retirement, as well as best wishes for a long and happy
retirement.
Ayes: Warren, McHale, Barber, Humphrey and Miller.
Nays: None.
8.C.l.e. RECOGNIZING MR. RUSSELL L. HOLMES, JR., DEPARTMENT
OF LICENSE INSPECTIONS, UPON HIS RETIREMENT
On motion of Mr. Miller, seconded by Mr. McHale, the Board
adopted the following resolution:
WHEREAS, Mr. Russell L. Holmes, Jr. will retire on
January 1, 2004 after providing twenty-five years of
dedicated and faithful service to Chesterfield County; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Holmes began his career with the
Chesterfield County License Inspector's Office in November
1978 as a Deputy License Inspector providing code enforcement
with business license and County license decals; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Holmes provided strong leadership by
empowering creative approaches to providing enforcement
services to the citizens and provided guidance to many
citizens of Chesterfield County, and has been acknowledged
for his many accomplishments of success of those he served;
and
WHEREAS, Mr. Holmes has served to train others within
the department, and worked with other localities in
enforcement issues; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Holmes has represented the Chesterfield
County License Inspector's Office in outstanding service,
and has provided extraordinary service in identifying
those in violation of our county ordinances, and has
worked with many citizens in the development of best
practice to code enforcement; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Holmes is an energetic and enthusiastic
employee for citizens who needed assistance in obtaining
proper licenses, and would always go that extra mile to
achieve a first choice community for all citizens, and
recognized for his commitment, dependability, and leadership
by the county, and is held in highest regard by his
colleagues; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Holmes will be missed for his professional
role of supporting citizens with license issues, and for the
quality and caliber of his commitment and performance as
Deputy License Inspector to the citizens and to Chesterfield
County.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Chesterfield
County Board of Supervisors, this 17th day of December 2003,
recognizes the contributions of Mr. Russell L. Holmes, Jr.,
and extends appreciation for twenty-five years of dedicated
03-1028
12/17/03
service to the county, congratulations upon his retirement,
and best wishes for a long and happy retirement.
Ayes: Warren, McHale, Barber, Humphrey and Miller.
Nays: None.
8.C.l.f. RECOONIZING MR. JOHN HUNTER DAVIS UPON ATTAINING
THE RANK OF EAGLE SCOUT
On motion of Mr. Miller, seconded by Mr. McHale, the Board
adopted the following resolution:
WHEREAS, the Boy Scouts of America was incorporated by
Mr. William D. Boyce on February 8, 1910, and was chartered
by Congress in 1916; and
WHEREAS, the Boy Scouts of America was founded to build
character, provide citizenship training and promote physical
fitness; and
WHEREAS, after earning at least twenty-one merit badges
in a wide variety of skills including leadership, service and
outdoor life, serving in a leadership position in a troop,
carrying out a service project beneficial to his community,
being active in the troop, demonstrating Scout spirit, and
living up to the Scout Oath and Law; and
WHEREAS, Mr. John Hunter Davis, Troop 876, sponsored by
Mount Pisgah United Methodist Church, has accomplished those
high standards of commitment and has reached the long-sought
goal of Eagle Scout, which is earned by only four percent of
those individuals entering the Scouting movement; and
WHEREAS, growing through his experiences in Scouting,
learning the lessons of responsible citizenship, and
endeavoring to prepare himself for a role as a leader in
society, Hunter has distinguished himself as a member of a
new generation of prepared young citizens of whom we can all
be very proud.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Chesterfield
County Board of Supervisors, this 17th day of December 2003,
recognizes Mr. John Hunter Davis, extends congratulations on
his attainment of Eagle Scout, and acknowledges the good
fortune of the County to have such an outstanding young man
as one of its citizens.
Ayes: Warren, McHale, Barber, Humphrey and Miller.
Nays: None.
8.C.l.g. RECOONIZING MS. VIROUS JONESFOR HER SERVICE ON THE
CHESTERFIELD COMMUNITY SERVICES BOARD
On motion of Mr. Miller, seconded by Mr. McHale, the Board
adopted the following resolution:
WHEREAS, Ms. Virous W. Jones, representing the Matoaca
Magisterial District, has served as a dedicated and faithful
member of the Chesterfield Community Services Board since her
appointment by the Board of Supervisors effective January 1,
2001; and
03-1029
12/17/03
WHEREAS, during her term as a member of the Chesterfield
County Community Services Board, Ms. Jones has served with
distinction as a member of the Program Committee and the
Policy Committee; and
WHEREAS, Ms. Jones has for a number of years been an
active volunteer and concerned citizen of Chesterfield
County, serving in numerous leadership capacities including
the Crater Community Hospice Volunteer program,
Chesterfield/Colonial Heights Social Services Board,
Volunteer Services Council of Central State Hospital, the
CARES Board, and the Crater Area AIDS Program Board; and
WHEREAS, the guidance and commitment demonstrated by Ms.
Jones is an important example of effective advocacy in
support of quality human services.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Chesterfield
County Board of Supervisors, this 17th day of December 2003,
hereby expresses its sincere appreciation to Ms. Virous W.
Jones for her continuing efforts to enhance the quality
mental health, mental retardation and substance abuse
services provided for citizens of Chesterfield County.
Ayes: Warren, McHale, Barber, Humphrey and Miller.
Nays: None.
8.C.l.h. RECOGNIZING MS. NANCY K. TURNER, CHESTERFIELD/
COLONIAL HEIGHTS DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES,
UPON HER RETIREMENT
On motion of Mr. Miller, seconded by Mr. McHale, the Board
adopted the following resolution:
WHEREAS, Ms. Nancy Turner began her public service with
Chesterfield County as an Eligibility Worker in the
Department of Social Services on March 2, 1981, having come
to the county with 11 years experience in social services;
and
WHEREAS, Ms. Turner worked with families receiving
assistance under the Aid to Families with Dependent Children
and Food Stamp Programs from 1981 to 1984; and
WHEREAS, Ms. Turner has worked with adults receiving
Medicaid since 1984; and
WHEREAS, Ms. Turner served on the Department of Social
Services Quality County for a term of one year in 1997; and
WHEREAS, throughout her career at the Department of
Social Services, Ms. Turner has served the most vulnerable
citizens of Chesterfield County and the City of Colonial
Heights; and
WHEREAS, Ms. Turner has been a dedicated and loyal
advocate for the citizens of Chesterfield County and the City
of Colonial Heights.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Chesterfield
County Board of Supervisors, this 17th day of December 2003,
03-1030
12/17/03
recognizes the outstanding contributions of Ms. Nancy Turner,
expresses the appreciation of all residents for her service
to Chesterfield County, and extends appreciation for her
dedicated service to the county and congratulations upon her
retirement, as well as best wishes for a long and happy
retirement.
Ayes: Warren, McHale, Barber, Humphrey and Miller.
Nays: None.
8.C.l.i. RECOGNIZING HR. JEROME BROWN, GENERAL SERVICES,
UPON HIS RETIREMENT
On motion of Mr. Miller, seconded by Mr. McHale, the Board
adopted the following resolution:
WHEREAS, Mr. Jerome Brown joined the county on April 1,
1977 in what was then called the County Sanitation Division;
and
WHEREAS, Mr. Brown provided exemplary service to the
customers on his route throughout his 26 years of service;
and
WHEREAS, Mr. Brown has furthered the county's recycling
efforts by collecting tons of used paper from the various
county facilities and schools; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Brown has worked during adverse weather
conditions to plow roads and clear walkways for citizens and
employees; and
WHEREAS, Mr.
Employee Advisory
Department; and
Brown has
Committee
served as a member of the
for the General Services
WHEREAS, Mr. Brown has always been willing to do
whatever was required to make the county a better community;
and
WHEREAS, Mr. Brown was always a team player and could be
counted on to do more than his fair share; and
WHEREAS, the Waste and Resource Recovery Division enjoys
a high degree of customer satisfaction due to the customer
service efforts of Mr. Brown.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Chesterfield
County Board of Supervisors hereby expresses its sincere
gratitude and appreciation to Mr. Jerome Brown for his years
of service to the citizens of the county and his dedication
to excellent customer service.
AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that a copy of this
resolution be presented to Mr. Brown and that this resolution
be permanently recorded among the papers of the Board of
Supervisors of Chesterfield County, Virginia.
Ayes: Warren, McHale, Barber, Humphrey and Miller.
Nays: None.
03-1031
12/17/03
8.C.l.j. RECOGNIZING MASTER POLICE OFFICER C. L. MOORE,
POLICE DEPARTMENT, UPON HIS RETIREMENT
On motion of Mr. Miller, seconded by Mr. McHale, the Board
adopted the following resolution:
WHEREAS, Master Police Officer C. L. Moore will retire
from the Chesterfield County Police Department on January 1,
2004; and
WHEREAS, Officer Moore has provided 32 years of quality
service to the citizens of Chesterfield County; and
WHEREAS, Officer Moore has faithfully served the county
in the capacity of Dispatcher, Patrol Officer, Senior Police
Officer, and Master Police Officer; and
WHEREAS, Officer Moore was selected as Police Officer of
the Year for the year of 1989; and
WHEREAS, Officer Moore served for two years as a member
of the Chesterfield County Police Marine Patrol; and
WHEREAS, Officer Moore received a Certificate of
Commendation for his swift actions and courage when he
responded to an alarm activation at the Central Fidelity Bank
in Ettrick, Virginia; and, after a brief foot pursuit, was
able to apprehend the suspect and assisted by detectives, was
able to obtain information which led to the arrest of three
accomplices and the recovery of a large amount of money; and
WHEREAS, Officer Moore has received numerous letters of
thanks and appreciation for assistance rendered in all types
of situations; and
WHEREAS, Officer Moore has provided the Chesterfield
County Police Department with many years of loyal and
dedicated service; and
WHEREAS, Chesterfield County and the Board of
Supervisors will miss Officer Moore's diligent service.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Chesterfield
County Board of Supervisors, this 17th day of December 2003,
recognizes Master Police Officer C. L. Moore, and extends on
behalf of its members and the citizens of Chesterfield County
appreciation for his service to the county, congratulations
upon his retirement, and best wishes for a long and happy
retirement.
Ayes: Warren, McHale, Barber, Humphrey and Miller.
Nays: None.
8.C.l.k. REC0~NIZING COMMANDER LOUIS W. MOORE, POLICE
DEPARTMENT, UPON HIS RETIREMENT
On motion of Mr. Miller, seconded by Mr. McHale, the Board
adopted the following resolution:
WHEREAS, Mr. Louis W. Moore will retire from the
Chesterfield County Police Department on January 1, 2004
03-1032
12/17/03
after providing 23 years of quality service to the citizens
of Chesterfield County; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Moore began his career with the Police
Department as a Systems and Procedures Analyst and has served
in various capacities and now serves as Commander of the
Administrative Support Bureau; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Moore began the era of personal computing
in the Police Department when he acquired the first personal
computer through a grant and implemented the first
departmental computerized network; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Moore programmed many PC based systems
himself, many of which are still in use today; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Moore has been responsible for all
automation in the Police Department since 1980, including the
highly praised Police Records Management System implemented
in 1999 that completely changed the way in which incident
reporting is accomplished; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Moore has been instrumental in assisting
with the implementation of growth throughout the department
in areas of automation, personnel, finance, and
decentralization to include the North and South District
Stations, and the Clover Hill Police Support Facility; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Moore has provided valuable input to two
police chiefs and their command staff over the years in
numerous areas to include reorganizations, fleet management,
and fiscal management reports of all types for decision
making purposes; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Moore has managed many support functions
within the Police Department, including records, booking,
planning and research, crime analysis, intelligence, traffic
analysis, grant writing, systems support, personnel,
administration, and finance; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Moore was selected as the Police
Department's Outstanding Civilian Employee of the Year in the
year 1985, and again in 2003; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Moore has provided direction and mentoring
to many subordinates; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Moore has provided the Chesterfield County
Police Department with many years of loyal and dedicated
service; and
WHEREAS, Chesterfield County and the Board
Supervisors will miss Mr. Moore's diligent service.
of
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Chesterfield
County Board of Supervisors, this 17th day of December 2003,
recognizes Mr. Louis W. Moore, and extends on behalf of its
members and the citizens of Chesterfield County, appreciation
for his service to the county, congratulations upon his
retirement, and best wishes for a long and happy retirement.
Ayes: Warren, McHale, Barber, Humphrey and Miller.
Nays: None.
03-1033
12/17/03
8.C.1.1.
RECOGNIZING THE CIVIL AIR PATROL ON ITS 62ND
ANNIVERSARY
On motion of Mr. Miller, seconded by Mr. McHale, the Board
adopted the following resolution:
WHEREAS, on December 1, 2003, the Civil Air Patrol, the
civilian volunteer auxiliary of the U.S. Air Force,
celebrated its 62nd anniversary in service to America; and
WHEREAS, the volunteer men and women of the Civil Air
Patrol have served our nation in a variety of roles,
including civil defense, emergency services, search and
rescue, aerospace education and cadet programs; and
WHEREAS, the Civil Air Patrol, in its capacity as the
official auxiliary of the U.S. Air Force, has been actively
engaged in homeland security missions along our nation's
borders and above our cities; and
WHEREAS, Civil Air Patrol pilots were in the skies after
the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, and provided the
first video images of the collapsed World Trade Center; and
WHEREAS, Civil Air Patrol pilots flew observation
flights for law enforcement during the Olympic Games in Salt
Lake City, as well as during the Columbia space shuttle
tragedy, patrolling the entire length of the debris field
working with the Federal Emergency Management Agency and NASA
to search for the remains of the space shuttle and its crew;
and
WHEREAS, the Civil Air Patrol Virginia Wing has 1,800
Virginians serving in its ranks and has established its
headquarters at the Chesterfield County Airport.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Chesterfield
County Board of Supervisors, this 17th day of December 2003,
recognizes the exemplary dedication of the volunteers of the
Civil Air Patrol and the invaluable service they provide to
maintaining homeland security.
Ayes: Warren, McHale, Barber, Humphrey and Miller.
Nays: None.
8.C.2. AWARD A CONTRACT FOR COMMISSIONING SERVICES TO
ENVIRO-MANAGEMENT AND RESEARCH INCORPORATED COMPANY
FOR THE NEW COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BUILDING AND
CUSTOMER SERVICE CENTER
On motion of Mr. Miller, seconded by Mr. McHale, the Board
authorized the County Administrator to execute a contract
with Enviro-Management and Research Incorporated Company
(EMR), in the amount of $132,500, for commissioning services
for the new Community Development building.
Ayes: Warren, McHale, Barber, Humphrey and Miller.
Nays: None.
03-103¢
12/17/03
8 · C · 3 · STATE ROAD ACCEPTANCE
On motion of Mr. Miller, seconded by Mr. McHale, the Board
adopted the following resolution:
WHEREAS, the streets described below are shown on plats
recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of
Chesterfield County; and
WHEREAS, the Resident Engineer for the Virginia
Department of Transportation has advised this Board the
streets meet the requirements established by the Subdivision
Street Requirements of the Virginia Department of
Transportation.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that this Board requests
the Virginia Department of Transportation to add the streets
described below to the secondary system of state highways,
pursuant to § 33.1-229, Code of Virginia, and the
Department' s Subdivision Street Requirements.
AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that this Board guarantees
a clear and unrestricted right-of-way, as described, and any
necessary easements for cuts, fills and drainage.
AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that a certified copy of
this resolution be forwarded to the Resident Engineer for the
Virginia Department of Transportation.
Type Chan~le to the Secondary System of State Highways: Addition
Beels for Change: Addition, New subdivision street
Statutory Reference: §33.1-229
Project: Greyfield Place, Section 4
· Greywater Court, State Route Number: 5565
From: Greywater Dr., (Rt. 5564)
To: Cul-de-sac, a distance of: 0.03 miles.
Right-of-way record was filed on 12/14/1995 with the Office Of Clerk To Circuit Court in Pb.89; Pg.51, with
a width of 43 Ft.
· Greywater Drive, State Route Number: 5564
From: Greyfield Dr., (Rt. 4954)
To: Greywater Ct., (Rt. 5565), a distance of: 0.10 miles.
Right-of-way record was filed on 12/14/1995 with the Office Of Clerk To Circuit Court in Pb.89; Pg.51, with
a width of 43 Ft.
· Greywater Drive, State Route Number': 5564
From: Greywater Ct., (Rt. 5565)
To: Cul-de-sac, a distance of: 0.03 miles.
Right-of-way record was filed on 12/14/1995 with the Office Of Clerk To Circuit Court in Pb.89; Pg.51, with
a width of 43 Ft.
And, further, the Board adopted the following resolution:
03-1035
12/17/03
WHEREAS, the streets described below
recorded in the Clerk's Office of the
Chesterfield County; and
are shown on plats
Circuit Court of
WHEREAS, the Resident Engineer for
Department of Transportation has advised
streets meet the requirements established by
Street Requirements of the Virginia
Transportation.
the Virginia
this Board the
the Subdivision
Department of
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that this Board requests
the Virginia Department of Transportation to add the streets
described below to the secondary system of state highways,
pursuant to § 33.1-229, Code of Virginia, and the
Department's Subdivision Street Requirements.
AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that this Board guarantees
a clear and unrestricted right-of-way, as described, and any
necessary easements for cuts, fills and drainage.
AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that a certified copy of
this resolution be forwarded to the Resident Engineer for the
Virginia Department of Transportation.
Type Change to the Secondary System of State Hlohwavs: Additlpn
Basis for Change:
Statutory Reference:
Project:
From:
To:
Addition, New subdivision street
§33.1-229
Village Woods
Laughlin Way, State Route Number: 5379
Village Woods Ln., (Rt. 5378)
Maughan House Tr., (Rt. 5380), a distance of: 0.05 miles.
Right-of-way record was filed on 7/13/2001 with the Office Of Clerk To Circuit Court in Pb. 119; Pg. 25,
with a width of 50 Ft.
· Maughan House Terrace, State Route Number: 5380
From: Laughlin Wy., (Rt. 5379)
To: Cul-de-sac, a distance of: 0.06 miles.
Right-of-way record was filed on 7/13/2001 with the Office Of Clerk To Circuit Court in Pb. 119; Pg. 25,
with a width of 50 Ft.
· Maughan House Terrace, State Route Number: 5380
From: Laughlin Wy., (Rt. 5379)
To: Cul-de-sac, a distance of: 0.03 miles.
Right-of-way record was filed on 7/13/2001 with the Office Of Clerk To Circuit Court in Pb. 119; Pg. 25,
with a width of 50 Ft.
· Village Woods Lane, State Route Number: 5378
From: Harrowgate Rd. (Rt. 144)
To: Laughlin Wy., (Rt. 5379), a distance of: 0.10 miles.
Right-of-way record was filed on 7/1 3/2001 with the Office Of Clerk To Circuit Court in Pb. 119; Pg. 25,
03-1036
12/17/03
with a width of 50 Ft.
·
From:
To:
Village Woods Lane, State Route Number: 5378
Laughlin Wy., (Rt. 5379)
Cul-de-sac, a distance of: 0.03 miles.
Right-of-way record was filed on 7/13/2001 with the Office Of Clerk To Cimuit Court in Pb. 119; Pg. 25,
with a width of 50 Ft.
And, further, the Board adopted the following resolution:
WHEREAS, the street described below is shown on plats
recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of
Chesterfield County; and
WHEREAS, the Resident EnGineer for the Virginia
Department of Transportation has advised this Board the
street meets the requirements established by the Subdivision
Street Requirements of the Virginia Department of
Transportation.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that this Board requests
the Virginia Department of Transportation to add the street
described below to the secondary system of state highways,
pursuant to § 33.1-229, Code of Virginia, and the
Department's Subdivision Street Requirements.
AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that this Board guarantees
a clear and unrestricted right-of-way, as described, and any
necessary easements for cuts, fills and drainage.
AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that a certified copy of
this resolution be forwarded to the Resident Engineer for the
Virginia Department of Transportation.
Type Change to the Secondary System of State Highways:
Basis for Change:
Statutory Reference:
Addition, New subdivision street
§33.1-229
Project:
From:
Addition
Memphis Boulevard
Memphis Boulevard, State Route Number: 936
0.20 Mi. N of Hull Street Rd., (Rt. 360)
0.26 Mi. N of Hull Street Rd., (Rt. 360), a distance of: 0.06 miles.
Right-of-way record was filed on 8/8/2003 with the Office Of Clerk To Circuit Court in Db.5293; Pg 338,
with a width of 90 Ft.
And, further, the Board adopted the following resolution:
WHEREAS, the street described below is shown on plats
recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of
Chesterfield County; and
WHEREAS, the Resident Engineer for the Virginia
Department of Transportation has advised this Board the
street meets the requirements established by the Subdivision
03-1037
12/17/03
Street Requirements of the Virginia Department of
Transportation.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that this Board requests
the Virginia Department of Transportation to add the street
described below to the secondary system of state highways,
pursuant to § 33.1-229, Code of Virginia, and the
Department's Subdivision Street Requirements.
AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that this Board guarantees
a clear and unrestricted right-of-way, as described, and any
necessary easements for cuts, fills and drainage.
AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that a certified copy of
this resolution be forwarded to the Resident Engineer for the
Virginia Department of Transportation.
T~me Chanae to the Secondary System of State HI;hwavs: Addition
Basis for Change:
Addition, New subdivision street
Statutory Reference: §33.1-229
Project: North Bailey Bridge Road
North Bailey Bridge Road, State Route Number: 651
From:
Existing Intersection of North Bailey Bridge Rd., (Rt. 651) & Hull Street Rd., (Rt.360)
0.07 Mi. N of Hull Street Rd., (Rt. 360), a distance of: 0.07 miles.
Right-of-way record was filed on 6/30/2000 with the Office Of Clerk To Cimuit Court in Db.3855; Pg. 815 &
Pg.818, with a width of Variable.
And, further, the Board adopted the following resolution:
WHEREAS, the streets described below are shown on plats
recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of
Chesterfield County; and
WHEREAS, the Resident Engineer for the Virginia
Department of Transportation has advised this Board the
streets meet the requirements established by the Subdivision
Street Requirements of the Virginia Department of
Transportation.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that this Board requests
the Virginia Department of Transportation to add the streets
described below to the secondary system of state highways,
pursuant to § 33.1-229, Code of Virginia, and the
Department's Subdivision Street Requirements.
AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that this Board guarantees
a clear and unrestricted right-of-way, as described, and any
necessary easements for cuts, fills and drainage.
AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that a certified copy of
this resolution be forwarded to the Resident Engineer for the
Virginia Department of Transportation.
Tvoe Chan;e to the Secondary System of State HighwaYs: Addition
Basis for Change:
Addition, New subdivision street
Statutory Reference:
§33.1-229
03-1038
12/17/03
Project:
From:
Old Hundred Mill, Section D
Mill Bluff Drive, State Route Number: 6022
Mill View Dr., (Rt. 4765)
Waterwheel Dr., (Rt. 5599), a distance of: 0.08 miles.
Right-of-way record was filed on 8/13/2001 with the Office Of Clerk To Cimuit Court in Pb.119; Pg. 83,
with a width of 44 Ft.
· Mill View Drive, State Route Number: 4765
From: 0.10 Mi. E of Old Hundred Rd., (Rt. 754)
To: Mill Bluff Dr., (Rt. 6022), a distance of: 0.21 miles.
Right-of-way record was filed on 8/13/2001 with the Office Of Clerk To Cimuit Court in Pb.119; Pg. 83,
with a width of Variable.
· Millstep Terrace, State Route Number: 5598
From: Waterwheel Dr., (Rt. 5599)
To: Cul-de-sac, a distance of: 0.06 miles.
Right-of-way record was filed on 8/1 3/2001 with the Office of Clerk To Circuit Court in Pb. 119; Pg. 83,
with a width of 40 Ft.
· MIIIstep Terrace, State Route Number: 5598
From: Waterwheel Dr., (Rt. 5599)
To: Cul-de-sac, a distance of: 0.03 miles.
Right-of-way record was filed on 8/13/2001 with the Office of Clerk To Circuit Court in Pb.119; Pg. 83,
with a width of 40 Ft.
· Waterwheel Drive, State Route Number: 5599
From: Mill Bluff Dr., (Rt. 6022)
To: Waterwheel Drive [loop], (Rt. 6021), a distance of: 0.05 miles.
Right-of-way record was filed on 8/13/2001 with the Office of Clerk To Circuit Court in Pb.119; Pg. 83,
with a width of 44 Ft.
· Waterwheel Drive, State Route Number: 5599
From: Waterwheel Drive [loop], (Rt. 6021)
To: Waterwheel Drive [loop], (Rt. 6021 ), a distance of: 0.02 miles.
Right-of-way record was filed on 8/13/2001 with the Office of Clerk To Circuit Court in Pb.119; Pg. 83,
with a width of 44 Ft.
· Waterwheel Drive, State Route Number: 5599
From: Waterwheel Drive [loop], (Rt. 6021)
To: 0.07 Mi. S of Waterwheel Drive [loop], (Rt. 6021), a distance of: 0.07 miles.
Right-of-way record was filed on 8/13/2001 with the Office Of Clerk To Circuit Court in Pb.119; Pg. 83,
with a width of 44 Ft.
· Waterwheel Drive, State Route Number: 5599
From: Mill Bluff Dr.s, (Rt. 6022)
03-1039
12/17/03
To: Millstep Tr., (Rt. 5598), a distance of: 0.11 miles.
Right-of-way record was filed on 8/13/2001 with the Office Of Clerk To Cimuit Court in Pb.119; Pg. 83,
with a width of 44 Ft.
Waterwheel Drive [loop], State Route Number: 6021
·
From:
To:
Waterwheel Dr., (Rt. 5599)
Waterwheel Dr., (Rt. 5599), a distance of: 0.04 miles.
Right-of-way record was filed on 8/13/2001 with the Office Of Clerk To Circuit Court in Pb.119; Pg. 83,
with a width of 44 Ft.
And, further, the Board adopted the following resolution:
WHEREAS, the street described below is shown on plats
recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of
Chesterfield County; and
WHEREAS, the Resident Engineer for the Virginia
Department of Transportation has advised this Board the
street meets the requirements established by the Subdivision
Street Requirements of the Virginia Department of
Transportation.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that this Board requests
the Virginia Department of Transportation to add the street
described below to the secondary system of state highways,
pursuant to § 33.1-229, Code of Virginia, and the
Department's Subdivision Street Requirements.
AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that this Board guarantees
a clear and unrestricted right-of-way, as described, and any
necessary easements for cuts, fills and drainage.
AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that a certified copy of
this resolution be forwarded to the Resident Engineer for the
Virginia Department of Transportation.
Tvoe Chanae to the Secondary System of State Hl~3hwavs:
Basis for Change:
Statutory Reference:
Addition, New subdivision street
§33.1-229
Project:
From:
To:
Addltl0n
Jessup Meadows, Section D
Jeesup Meadows Drive, State Route Number: 3928
Zion Ridge Dr., (Rt. 5275)
0.29 Mi. S of Zion Ridge Dr., (Rt. 5275), a distance of: 0.29 miles.
Righbof-way reco~ was filed on 11/1~2002 with the Off~e Of Clerk ~ Cimu~ ~urt in Pb. 1~; Pg. 28,
with a width ~ 40 R.
And, further, the Board adopted the following resolution:
WHEREAS, the streets described below are shown on plats
recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of
Chesterfield County; and
03-Z040
Z2/~7/03
WHEREAS, the Resident Engineer for
Department of Transportation has advised
streets meet the requirements established by
Street Requirements of the Virginia
Transportation.
the Virginia
this Board the
the Subdivision
Department of
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that this Board requests
the Virginia Department of Transportation to add the streets
described below to the secondary system of state highways,
pursuant to § 33.1-229, Code of Virginia,
Department's Subdivision Street Requirements.
AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that
a clear and unrestricted right-of-way,
necessary easements for cuts, fills and
AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that a certified
this resolution be forwarded to the Resident Engineer
Virginia Department of Transportation.
Type Chan;ie to the Secondary System of State HI;Ihways: Addition
Basis for Change: Addition, New subdivision street
Statutory Reference: §33.1-229
Project: Windsor Park, Section 6
· Princess Mary Place, State Route Number: 5575
From: Princess Mary Rd., (Rt. 4359)
To: Cul-de-sac, a distance of: 0.09 miles.
Right-of-way record was filed on 11/23/1998 with the Office Of Clerk To Circuit Court in Pb.101; Pg. 92,
with a width of 50 Ft.
· Princess Mary Place, State Route Number: 5575
From: Princess Mary Rd., (Rt. 4359)
To: Trumpington Ct., (Rt. 5576), a distance of: 0.10 miles.
Right-of-way record was filed on 11/23/1998 with the Office Of Clerk To Circuit Court in Pb. 101; Pg. 92,
with a width of 50 Ft.
· Princess Mary Road, State Route Number: 4359
From: 0.03 Mi. W of Princess Mary Tr., (Rt. 4397)
To: Princess Mary Pi., (Rt. 5575), a distance of: 0.15 miles.
Right-of-way record was filed on 11/23/1998 with the Office Of Clerk To Circuit Court in Pb.101; Pg. 92,
with a width of 50 Ft.
· Trumpington Court, State Route Number: 5576
From: Princess Mary Pl., (Rt. 5575)
To: Cul-de-sac, a distance of: 0.14. miles.
Right-of-way record was filed on 11/23/1998 with the Office Of Clerk To Circuit Court in Pb. 101; Pg. 92,
with a width of 50 Ft.
· Trumpington Court, State Route Number: 5576
From: Princess Mary PI., (Rt. 5575)
and the
this Board guarantees
as described, and any
drainage.
copy of
for the
03-1041
12/17/03
To: Cul-de-sac, a distance of: 0.08 miles.
Right-of-way record was filed on 11/23/1998 with the Office Of Clerk To Cimuit Court in Pb.101; Pg. 92,
with a width of 50 Ft.
And, further, the Board adopted the following resolution:
WHEREAS, the street described below are shown on plats
recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of
Chesterfield County; and
WHEREAS, the Resident Engineer for the Virginia
Department of Transportation has advised this Board the
street meets the requirements established by the Subdivision
Street Requirements of the Virginia Department of
Transportation.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that this Board requests
the Virginia Department of Transportation to add the street
described below to the secondary system of state highways,
pursuant to § 33.1-229, Code of Virginia, and the
Department's Subdivision Street Requirements.
AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that this Board guarantees
a clear and unrestricted right-of-way, as described, and any
necessary easements for cuts, fills and drainage.
AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that a certified copy of
this resolution be forwarded to the Resident Engineer for the
Virginia Department of Transportation.
Tvoe Chanae to the Secondary System of State Highways: Addltl0n
Basis for Change:
Statutory Reference:
Project:
From:
To:
Addition, New subdivision street
633.1-229
Stonehenge Mews
Blakeeton Court, State Route Number: 2630
0.02 Mi. SW of Blakeston Dr., (Rt. 2752)
Cul-de-sac, a distance of: 0.03 miles.
Right-of-wayr~o~ wasfiled on2/7/2002withtheOff~e Of Clerk ~ CimuitCourtinPb. 123;Pg. 71,with
a width of~Ft.
Ayes: Warren, McHale, Barber, Humphrey and Miller.
Nays: None.
8.C.4. SET DATE FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS
8.C.4.&. TO CONSIDER AMENDMENTS TO THE PLAN FOR CHESTERFIELD
RELATING TO THE ETTRICK VILLAGE PLAN AND RELATED
ZONING ORDINANCES
On motion of Mr. Miller, seconded by Mr. McHale, the Board
set the date of January 14, 2004 at 7:00 p.m. for a public
hearing to consider amendments to The Plan for Chesterfield
relating to the Ettrick Village Plan and related zoning
ordinances.
Ayes: Warren, McHale, Barber, Humphrey and Miller.
Nays: None.
03-1042
12/17/03
8.C.4.c. TO CON~IDER THE EXERCISE OF EMINENT DOMAIN FOR THE
ACQUISITION OF PERMANENT AND TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION
EASEMENTS FOR THE RUFFIN MILL-PHASE II WATERLINE
PROJECT
On motion of Mr.i Miller, seconded by Mr. McHale, the Board
set the date of January 14, 2004 at 7:00 p.m. for a public
hearing to consider the exercise of eminent domain for the
acquisition of permanent and temporary construction easements
for the Ruffin Mill-Phase II Waterline Project.
Ayes: Warren, McHale, Barber, Humphrey and Miller.
Nays: None.
8.C.5. AWARD OF iPROPOSAL FOR THE DEVELOPMENT AND OPERATION
OF A WOOD WASTE PROCESSING AND/OR COMPOSTING FACILITY
AT THE SOUTHERN AREA TRANSFER STATION
On motion of Mr. Miller, seconded by Mr. McHale, the Board
authorized the County Administrator to accept a proposal from
Shoosmith Brothers, Incorporated for the development and
operation of a wood waste processing and/or composting
facility at the Southern Area Transfer Station. (It is noted
this is a multi-year proposal that will be contracted in one-
year increments.)
Ayes: Warren, McHale, Barber, Humphrey and Miller.
Nays: None.
8.C.6.
8.C.6.&.
TRANSFER iOF DISTRICT IMPROVEMENT FUNDS
FROM THE DALE DISTRICT IMPROVEMENT FUND TO THE
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD TO PURCHASE
CAMERAS FOR THE PHOTOGRAPHY DEPARTMENT AT
MEADOWBROOK HIGH SCHOOL
On motion of Mr. Miller, seconded by Mr. McHale, the Board
transferred $1,700 from the Dale District. Improvement Fund to
the Chesterfield County School Board to purchase cameras for
the Photography Department at Meadowbrook High School.
Ayes: Warren, McHale, Barber, Humphrey and Miller.
Nays: None.
8.C.6.b. FROM THE BERMUDA DISTRICT IMPROVEMENT FUND
8.C.6.b.1. TO THE CHESTERFIELD PUBLIC LIBRARY TO PURCHASE
BOOKS ON COMPACT DISCS FOR THE CHESTER/ENON
LIBRARY
On motion of Mr.i Miller, seconded by Mr. McHale, the Board
transferred $1,00!0 from the Bermuda District Improvement Fund
to the Chesterfield Public Library to purchase books on
compact discs fori the Chester/Enon Library.
Ayes: Warren, McHale, Barber, Humphrey and Miller.
Nays: None.
03-1043
12/17/03
8.C.6.b.2.
TO THE CHESTERFIELD COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENT TO
UPGRADE THE EXERCISE FACILITIES AT THE DUTC~ ~AP
STATION
On motion of Mr. Miller, seconded by Mr. McHale, the Board
transferred $16,500 from the Bermuda District Improvement
Fund to the Chesterfield County Fire Department to upgrade
the exercise facilities at the Dutch Gap Station.
Ayes: Warren, McHale, Barber, Humphrey and Miller.
Nays: None.
8.C.6.b.3.
TO THE CHESTERFIELD COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD TO
PURCHASE ~THE EDUCATIONAL ENRiChMENT PACKAGE"
FOR SIX CHESTERFIELD COUNTY HIGH SCHOOLS
On motion of Mr. Miller, seconded by Mr. McHale, the Board
transferred $1,800 from the Bermuda District Improvement Fund
to the Chesterfield County School Board to purchase "The
Educational Enrichment Package" for six Chesterfield County
high schools.
Ayes: Warren, McHale, Barber, Humphrey and Miller.
Nays: None.
8.C.7. APPROVAL OF OPTION AGREEMENT WITH GEORGE EMERSON, ET
AL. AND THE INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY TO PURCHASE 145 ACHES IN THE
BERMUDA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT AND APPROPRIATION OF
FUNDS TO THE INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
On motion of Mr. Miller, seconded by Mr. McHale, the Board
approved an option agreement with George Emerson, et al. and
the Industrial Development Authority (IDA) of Chesterfield
County to purchase 145 acres in the Bermuda Magisterial
District, and appropriated $50,000 to the IDA for the option.
(It is noted a copy of the option agreement is filed with the
papers of this Board.)
Ayes: Warren, McHale, Barber, Humphrey and Miller.
Nays: None.
8.C.8. AWARD OF CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT TO CASPER COLOSIMO AND
SON, INCORPORATED FOR THE BAILEY BRID~E FORCEMAIN -
PHASE III PROJECT
On motion of Mr. Miller, seconded by Mr. McHale, the Board
awarded a construction contract to Casper Colosimo and Son,
Incorporated, in the amount of $1,721,354, for the Bailey
Bridge Forcemain - Phase III Project, and authorized the
County Administrator to execute the necessary documents.
Ayes: Warren, McHale, Barber, Humphrey and Miller.
Nays: None.
8.C.9. ACCEPTANCE OF PARCELS OF LAND
8.C.9.a. ALONG THE WEST RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF OTTERDALE ROAD
FROM CAROL W. BERGER
On motion of Mr. Miller, seconded by Mr. McHale, the Board
accepted the conveyance of a parcel of land containing 0.530
03-1044
12/17/03
acres along the west right of way line of Otterdale Road
(State Route 667i) from Carol W. Berger, and authorized the
County Administrator to execute the deed. (It is noted a
copy of the plat lis filed with the papers of this Board.)
Ayes: Warren, McHale, Barber, Humphrey and Miller.
Nays: None.
8.C.9.b.
FOR THE EXTENSION OF WOOLRID~E ROAD FROM SALVATORE
J. CANGIANO
On motion of Mr.i Miller, seconded by Mr. McHale, the Board
accepted the conyeyance of two parcels of land containing a
total of 7.226 acres for the extension of Woolridge Road from
Salvatore J. iCangiano, and authorized the County
Administrator to ~execute the deed. (It is noted copies of the
plats are filed With the papers of this Board.)
Ayes: Warren, McHale, Barber, Humphrey and Miller.
Nays: None.
8.C.9.c.
ALONG THE SOUTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF ECOFF AVENUE
FROM I~NE W. CARNES AND JOSEPH E. JACKSON
On motion of Mr.i Miller, seconded by Mr. McHale, the Board
accepted the conveyance of a parcel of land containing 0.118
acres along the south right of way line of Ecoff Avenue
(State Route 15102) from Irene W. Carnes and Joseph E.
Jackson, and authorized the County Administrator to execute
the deed. (It is noted a copy of the plat is filed with the
papers of this Board.)
Ayes: Warren, McHale, Barber, Humphrey and Miller.
Nays: None.
8.C.9.d.
ALONG ~ WEST RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF WEST HUNDRED
ROAD FROM XRENE W. CARNES
On motion of Mr.i Miller, seconded by Mr. McHale, the Board
accepted the conveyance of a parcel of land containing 0.013
acres along the west right of way line of West Hundred Road
(State Route 10)i from Irene W. Carnes, and authorized the
County Administrator to execute the deed. (It is noted a
copy of the plat is filed with the papers of this Board.)
Ayes: Warren, McHale, Barber, Humphrey and Miller.
Nays: None.
8.C.9.e.
ALONG THE WEST RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF BELMONT ROAD
FROM THE TRUSTEES OF CHURCH OF COD AT ALPHA Y OMEGA
On motion of Mr.i Miller, seconded by Mr. McHale, the Board
accepted the conveyance of a parcel of land containing 0.740
acres along the west right of way line ,Df Belmont Road from
Trustees of Church of God at Alpha Y Omega, and authorized
the County Administrator to execute the deed. (It is noted a
copy of the plat lis filed with the papers of this Board.)
Ayes: Warren, McHiale, Barber, Humphrey and Miller.
Nays: None.
03-1045
12/17/03
8 .C.9 .f. ALONG THE WEST RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF OTTERDALE ROAD
FROM JOHN S. HINES AND ROSALIE O. HINES
On motion of Mr. Miller, seconded by Mr. McHale, the Board
accepted the conveyance of a parcel of land containing 0.272
acres along the west right of way line of Otterdale Road
(State Route 667) from John S. Hines and Rosalie O. Hines,
and authorized the County Administrator to execute the deed.
(It is noted a copy of the plat is filed with the papers of
this Board.)
Ayes: Warren, McHale, Barber, Humphrey and Miller.
Nays: None.
8.C.9.g. ALONG THE EAST RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF OTTERDALE ROAD
AND THE EAST RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF WOOLRID~E ROAD
FROM STOPF MONTEZ DEVELOPMENT, L.L.C.
On motion of Mr. Miller, seconded by Mr. McHale, the Board
accepted the conveyance of four parcels of land containing a
total of 0.472 acres along the east right of way line of
Otterdale Road (State Route 667) and the east right of way
line of Woolridge Road (State Route 668) from Stopf Montez
Development, L.L.C., and authorized the County Administrator
to execute the deed. (It is noted a copy of the plat is
filed with the papers of this Board.)
Ayes: Warren, McHale, Barber, Humphrey and Miller.
Nays: None.
8.C.9.h. ALONG THE WEST RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF WOOLRID~E ROAD
FROM RICHARD W. STOPF AND LINDA K. STOPF
On motion of Mr. Miller, seconded by Mr. McHale, the Board
accepted the conveyance of a parcel of land containing 0.093
acres along the west right of way line of Woolridge Road
(State Route 668) from Richard W. Stopf and Linda K. Stopf,
and authorized the County Administrator to execute the deed.
(It is noted a copy of the plat is filed with the papers of
this Board.)
Ayes: Warren, McHale, Barber, Humphrey and Miller.
Nays: None.
8.C.9.i. ALONG THE EAST RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF OTTERDALE ROAD
FROM ROBERT W. GLASS AND CATHERINE L. GLASS
On motion of Mr. Miller, seconded by Mr. McHale, the Board
accepted the conveyance of a parcel of land containing 0.063
acres along the east right of way line of Otterdale Road
(State Route 667) from Robert W. Glass and Catherine L.
Glass, and authorized the County Administrator to execute the
deed. (It is noted a copy of the plat is filed with the
papers of this Board.)
Ayes: Warren, McHale, Barber, Humphrey and Miller.
Nays: None.
03-1046
12/17/03
8.C.10.
REQUEST TO QUITCLAIM PORTIONS OF A SIXTEEN-FOOT
SEWER EASEMENT ACROSS THE PROPERTY OF HARBOURSiDE
CENTRE, LLC
On motion of Mr.! Miller, seconded by Mr. McHale, the Board
authorized the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors and the
County Administrator to execute a quitclaim deed to vacate
portions of a siXteen-foot sewer easement across the property
of Harbourside Centre, LLC. (It is noted a copy of the plat
is filed with the papers of this Board.)
Ayes: Warren, McHale, Barber, Humphrey and Miller.
Nays: None.
8.C.11.
APPROVALi OF WETLANDS MITIGATION AGREEMENTS WITH
JAMES R~R MITIGATION LANDBANK, LLC
8.C.11.&.
FOR THE EXTENSION OF MT. HERMON ROAD AT HORNER
PARK
On motion of Mr.~ Miller, seconded by Mr. McHale, the Board
authorized the County Administrator to execute a Wetlands
Mitigation Agreement with James River Mitigation Landbank,
LLC for the extenision of Mt. Hermon Road at Horner Park.
Ayes: Warren, McHale, Barber, Humphrey and Miller.
Nays: None.
8.C.11.b. FOR THE BAILEY BRIDGE FORCE MAIN PROJECT
On motion of Mr.i Miller, seconded by Mr. McHale, the Board
authorized the County Administrator to execute a Wetlands
Mitigation Agreement with James River Mitigation Landbank,
LLC for the Bailey Bridge Force Main Project.
Ayes: Warren, McHale, Barber, Humphrey and Miller.
Nays: None.
8 .C.12. REQUEST TO QUITCLAIM A VARIABLE WIDTH STORM WATER
MANAGEMENT/BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICE EASEMENT AND A
THIRTY-FOOT STORM WATERMANAGEMENT/BEST MANAGEMENT
PRACTICE ACCESS EASEMENT ACROSS THE PROPERTY OF JIM
AND DEBORAH YORKE, L.L.C.
On motion of Mr.i Miller, secolnded by Mr. McHale, the Board
authorized the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors and the
County Administrator to execute a quitclaim deed to vacate a
variable width storm water management/best management
practice easemenl and a 30-foot storm water management/best
management practice access easement across the property of
Jim and Deborah iYorke, L.L.C. (It is noted a copy of the
plat is filed wit!h the papers of this Board.)
Ayes: Warren, McHale, Barber, Humphrey and Miller.
Nays: None.
8.C.13. REQUEST PERMISSION FROM SWIFT CREEK ASSOCiATES, L.P.
FOR LIGHT POLES TO ENCROACH WITHIN A SIXTEEN-FOOT
DRAINAGE EASEMENT
On motion of Mr. Miller, seconded by Mr. McHale, the Board
approved a request from Swift Creek Associates, L.P. for
permission for light poles to encroach within a 16-foot
03-1047
12/17/03
drainage easement, subject to the execution of a license
agreement. (It is noted a copy of the plat is filed with the
papers of this Board.)
Ayes: Warren, McHale, Barber, Humphrey and Miller.
Nays: None.
8.C.1&. APPROVAL OF UTILITY CONTRACT FOR FIVE FORKS VILLAGE
SOUTH, SECTION 2 AND OFFSITE SEWER PROJECT
On motion of Mr. Miller, seconded by Mr. McHale, the Board
approved the following utility contract for Five Forks
Village South, Section 2 and Offsite Sewer, Contract Number
02-0045:
Developer:
Contractor: Bookman Construction
Contract Amount:
Estimated County Cost for Oversizing (Water)
Estimated County Cost for Oversizing
(Wastewater) .................
Estimated County Cost for Offsite
(Wastewater) .................
Estimated Developer Cost ...........
Estimated Total ................
Code: (Refunds thru Connections - Oversizing)
(Refunds thru Connections - Oversizing)
(Refunds thru Connections - Offsite)
District: Dale
Cascade Creek Homes, Incorporated
$34,904.00
$22,135.00
$17,550.00
$492,944.00
$567,533.00
5N-572VO-E4C
5B-572VO-E4C
5N-572VO-E4D
(It is noted a copy of the vicinity sketch is filed with the
papers of this Board.)
Ayes: Warren, McHale, Barber, Humphrey and Miller.
Nays: None.
The following item was removed from the Consent Agenda for
Board discussion:
8 .C.4 .b.
TO CONSIDER INCREASING THEAPPROPRIATION OF
ANTICIPATED REIMBURSEMENTS FOR HURRICANE ISABEL
DEBRIS PICK-UP PR0~RAM
Mr. Warren stated he is an employee of the Virginia
Department of Emergency Management, declared a conflict of
interest under the Virginia Conflict of Interest Act
regarding this issue, and declined to participate in the
matter.
On motion of Mrs. Humphrey, seconded by Mr. Barber, the Board
set the date of January 14, 2004 at 7:00 p.m. for a public
hearing to consider increasing the appropriation of
anticipated reimbursements from FEMA and the State Department
of Emergency Management by an additional $10,500,000 for
Hurricane Isabel debris pick-up.
Ayes: McHale, Barber, Humphrey and Miller.
Nays: None.
Absent: Warren.
03-1048
12/17/03
9. HEARINGS OF CITIZENS ON UNSCHEDULEDMATTERS OR CLAIMS
There were no hearings of citizens on unscheduled matters or
claims at this time.
10. REPORTS
10.A. REPORT ON THE DEVELOPER WATER AND SEWER CONTRACTS
10.B. REPORT ON THE STATUS OF ~ENERAL FUND BALANCE, RESERVE
FOR FUTUREiCAPITAL PROJECTS, DISTRICT IMPROVEMENT
10 .C.
FUNDS AND LEASE PURCHASES
REPORT ON ROADS ACCEPTED INTO THE STATE SECONDARY
SYSTEM
On motion of Mrs.i Humphrey, seconded by Mr. McHale, the Board
approved the following reports: A report on Developer Water
and Sewer Contracts; and a Report on the Status of the
General Fund Balance, Reserve for Future Capital Projects,
District Improvement Funds and Lease Purchases.
And, further, the following roads were accepted into the
state secondary system:
ADDITION LENGTH
ARBOR LANDING, SECTION 6
(Effective 10/10/!03)
Arbor Point Terrace (Route 5570) - From Drayton
Landing Drive (Route 5568) to Cul-de-sac
0.05 Mi
Drayton Landing Court (Route 5569) - From Drayton
Landing Drive (RoUte 5568) to Cul-de-sac
0.06 Mi
Drayton Landing Drive (Route 5568) - From
Ironbridge Parkway (Route 1569) to Drayton
Landing Court (Route 5569)
0.04 Mi
Drayton Landing Drive (Route 5568) - From
Drayton Landing Court (Route 5569) to Arbor
Point Terrace (RoUte 5570)
0.05 Mi
Drayton Landing Drive (Route 5568) - From
Arbor Point Terrace (Route 5570) to Cul-de-sac
0.07 Mi
BON AIR VILLAS
(Effective 10/17/103)
Waters Mill Drive (Route 830) - From 0.04 mile
north of 01d Bon Air/Rockaway Road (Route 718)
to Cul-de-sac
0.05 Mi
CARTERS MILL, SECTION 6
(Effective 10/10/03)
Carters Creek Drive (Route 6003) - From 0.05
mile south of Carters Valley Road (Route 6009)
to Cul-de-sac
0.14 Mi
03-1049
12/17/03
COBBS POINT, SECTION 1
(Effective 10/10/03)
Cobbs Point Drive (Route 5522) - From Cobbs Point
Way (Route 5523) to Cul-de-sac
Cobbs Point Drive (Route 5522) - From Enon Church
Road (Route 746) to Cobbs Point Way (Route 5523)
Cobbs Point Way (Route 5523) - From Cobbs Point
Drive (Route 5522} to Cul-de-sac
FOREST HILL MANOR
(Effective 10/28/03)
Bendemeer Road (Route 2058) - From 0.05 mile
west of Tuscora Road (Route 1975) to Cul-de-sac
GLEN RIDGE, SECTION 1
(Effective 10/10/03)
Glen Ridge Court (Route 5577) - From Village
Square Parkway (Route 3867) to Cul-de-sac
JESSUP STATION
(Effective 10/17/03)
Holden Road (Route 5559) - From Jessup Station
Drive (Route 5560) to Cul-de-sac
Holden Road (Route 5559) - From Jessup Station
Drive (Route 5560) to 0.09 mile west of Jessup
Station Drive (Route 5560)
Jessup Station Court (Route 5557) - From Jessup
Station Drive (Route 5560) to Cul-de-sac
Jessup Station Drive (Route 5560) - From Jessup
Station Place (Route 5558) and Jessup Station
Court (Route 5557)
Jessup Station Drive (Route 5560) - From Jessup
Station Place (Route 5558) and Jessup Station
Court (Route 5557) to Holden Road (Route 5559)
Jessup Station Place (Route 5558) - From Jessup
Station Drive (Route 5560) to Cul-de-sac
MONTCLAIR, SECTION 1, PHASE 1
(Effective 10/10/03)
Bermuda Orchard Road (Route 828) - From Greymont
Lane (Route 5572) to 0.02 mile south of
Greymont Lane (Route 5572)
Bermuda Orchard Road (Route 828) - From Martineau
Drive (Route 4877) to Greyshire Drive (Route 5571)
Bermuda Orchard Road (Route 828) - From Greyshire
Drive (Route 5571) to Greymont Lane (Route 5572)
Greymont Lane (Route 5572) - From Bermuda Orchard
Lane (Route 828) to Greyshire Drive (Route 5571)
03-1050
0.08 Mi
0.13 Mi
0.06 Mi
0.09 Mi
0.08 Mi
0.04 Mi
0.09 Mi
0.09 Mi
0.05 Mi
0.07 Mi
0.03 Mi
0.02 Mi
0.22 Mi
0.18 Mi
0.20 Mi
12/17/03
Greyshire Drive (Route 5571) - From Greymont Lane
{Route 5572) to 0.18 mile east of Greymont Lane
(Route 5572)
Greyshire Drive (Route 5571) - From Bermuda
Orchard Road (Route 828) to Greymont Lane (Route
5572)
SOUTHCREEK, SECTION 6
(Effective 10/10/03)
Grand Forest Terrace (Route 5567) - From Pleasant
Creek Drive (Route 5566) to Cul-de-sac
Pleasant Creek Drive (Route 5566) - From Grand
Forest Terrace (Route 5567) to 0.03 mile south
of Grand Forest Terrace (Route 5567)
Pleasant Creek Drive (Route 5566) - From Walthall
Creek Drive (Route 4067) to Cul-de-sac
Pleasant Creek Drive (Route 5566) - From Walthall
Creek Drive (Route 4067) to Grand Forrest
Terrace (Route 5567)
Walthall Creek Drive (Route 4067) - From 0.03
mile south of Majestic Creek Drive (Route 4516)
to Pleasant Creek Drive (Route 5566)
WHITESTONE, SECTION 4
Scottingham Drive (Route 2728) - From Wadsworth
Drive (Route 2687) to Trickling' Creek Road {Route
5582)
Trickling Creek Road (Route 5582) - From
Scottingham Drive (Route 2728) to Cul-de-sac
WILLESDEN AT STONEHENGE
Farnham Circle (Route 5574) - From Farnham Drive
(Route 2561) to Farnham Drive (Route 2561)
Farnham Court (Route 5573) - From Farnham Drive
(Route 2561) to F!arnham Drive (Route 2561)
Ayes: Warren, McHale, Barber, Humphrey and Miller.
Nays: None.
0.18 Mi
0.22 Mi
0.25 Mi
0.03 Mi
0.09 Mi
0.09 Mi
0.04 Mi
0.06 Mi
0.12 Mi
0.12 Mi
0.05 Mi
11. CLOSED SESSION PURSUANT TO SECTION 2.2-3711(A)(1),
CODE OF VIRGiINIA, 1950, AS AMENDED, RELATING TO THE
PERFORMANCE OF A SPECIFIC EMPLOYEE OF THE COUNTY
On motion of Mr. McHale, seconded by Mr. Warren, the Board
went into a Closed Session pursuant to Section 2.2-
3711(A) (1), Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended, relating to
the performance of a specific employee of the county.
Ayes: Warren, McHale, Barber, Humphrey and Miller.
Nays: None.
03-1051
12/17/03
Reconvening:
On motion of Mr. Barber, seconded by Mrs. Humphrey, the Board
adopted the following resolution:
WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors has this day adjourned
into Closed Session in accordance with a formal vote of the
Board and in accordance with the provisions of the Virginia
Freedom of Information Act; and
WHEREAS, the Virginia Freedom of Information Act
effective July 1, 1989 provides for certification that such
Closed Session was conducted in conformity with law.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, the Board of Supervisors
does hereby certify that to the best of each member's
knowledge, i) only public business matters lawfully exempted
from open meeting requirements under the Freedom of
Information Act were discussed in the Closed Session to which
this certification applies, and
ii) only such public business matters as were identified
in the Motion by which the Closed Session was convened were
heard, discussed, or considered by the Board. No member
dissents from this certification.
The Board being polled, the vote was as follows:
Mr. Miller: Aye.
Mrs. Humphrey: Aye.
Mr. Barber: Aye.
Mr. McHale: Aye.
Mr. Warren: Aye.
12. DINNER
On motion of Mr. Barber, seconded by Mr. McHale, the Board
recessed to the Administration Building, Room 502, for
dinner.
Ayes: Warren, McHale, Barber, Humphrey and Miller.
Nays: None.
Reconvening:
13. INVOCATION
Reverend Calvin Eaves, Pastor of Clover Hill Baptist Church,
gave the invocation.
14. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG OF THE UNITED STATES OF
AMERICA
Eagle Scouts Thomas Anthony Fletcher, Jr. and Matthew William
Piper led the pledge of allegiance to the flag of the United
States of America.
03-1052
12/17/03
15. RESOLUTIONS AND SPECIAL RECOGNITIONS
15.A. RECO~NIZIN~ MRS. SUSAN R. KALAN~ES FOR HER SERVICE ON
THE CHESTERFIELD COMMUNITY SERVICES BOARD
Mr. Braunstein introduced Mrs. Susan Kalanges who was present
to receive the resolution.
On motion of the Board, the following resolution was adopted:
WHEREAS, Mrs. Susan R. Kalanges, representing the
Bermuda Magisterial District, has served as a dedicated and
faithful member of the Chesterfield Community Services Board
since her appointment by the Board of Supervisors in May
1992; and
WHEREAS, during her three terms as a member of the
Chesterfield Community Services Board, Mrs. Kalanges has
served with distinction on the Executive Committee in the
office of Secretary, and the office of Vice Chair as well as
Chair of the Program Committee and Finance Committee, and
member of the Audit Committee, Residential Ad Hoc Committee,
Research Committee, and the Member SMI Planning Team; and
WHEREAS, on behalf of the Chesterfield Community
Services Board, Mrs. Kalanges has been active on the state
level as the HPR IV Representative at state budget hearings
and is recognized as an articulate advocate for quality
behavioral health care; and
WHEREAS, Mrs. Kalanges has for a number of years been an
active volunteer and concerned citizen of Chesterfield
County, serving in numerous leadership capacities including
the Board of Chesterfield Citizens for People with
Retardation, St. Paul's Church Committee for Hull Street
Shelter for the Homeless, and the Army Community Services;
and
WHEREAS, Mrs. Kalanges has been appointed by the
Governor to the Board of the Virginia Office of Protection
and Advocacy and serves on the Board of the Commonwealth
Community Trust; and
WHEREAS, Mrs. Kalanges is acknowledged locally and
throughout the Commonwealth for her steadfast dedication and
genuine concern for persons with mental disabilities.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Chesterfield
County Board of Supervisors, this 17th day of December 2003,
publicly recognizes Mrs. Susan R. Kalanges and expresses
sincere appreciation for her many years of commitment and
significant contributions in the provision of quality mental
health, mental retardation and substance abuse services to
the citizens of Chesterfield County.
AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that a copy of this
resolution be presented to Mrs. Kalanges and that this
resolution be permanently recorded among the papers of the
Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County, Virginia.
Ayes: Warren, McHale, Barber, Humphrey and Miller.
Nays: None.
03-1053
12/17/03
Mr. McHale presented the executed resolution to Mrs.
Kalanges, accompanied by her husband, Mr. Braunstein, and Mr.
Thomas "Mac" Deadmore, former Chairman of the Community
Services Board, and expressed appreciation for her dedicated
service on the Chesterfield Community Services Board.
Mrs. Kalanges expressed appreciation to the Board for the
learning experience she received while serving on the
Community Services Board.
Mr. Deadmore expressed appreciation to Mrs. Kalanges for her
dedicated service.
15.B. RECO~NIZINGMR. JAMES KALANGES FOR HIS SERVICE ON THE
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY SOLID WASTE ADVISORY COMMITTEE
Mr. Pitaro introduced Mr. James Kalanges who was present to
receive the resolution.
On motion of the Board, the following resolution was adopted:
WHEREAS, Mr. James Kalanges represented the Bermuda
District as a member of the Chesterfield County Solid Waste
Advisory Committee from March 1995 to November 2003; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Kalanges provided guidance and assistance
in the development of the county's curbside recycling
program; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Kalanges provided valuable insight while
helping to establish the strategic plan for the Division of
Waste and Resource Recovery; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Kalanges was always cognizant of the
important roles played by both the county and the private
collectors in providing environmentally safe solid waste
management systems in the county; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Kalanges provided wise and professional
guidance to staff on all areas of solid waste management
during his tenure on the Solid Waste Advisory Committee; and
WHEREAS, the division will continue to work with the
solid waste industry to provide county residents with the
best refuse collection services available.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Chesterfield
County Board of Supervisors, this 17tn day of December 2003,
publicly expresses its sincere gratitude and appreciation to
Mr. James Kalanges for his service to the county as a member
of the Solid Waste Advisory Committee representing the
Bermuda District.
AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that a copy of this
resolution is presented to Mr. Kalanges and that this
resolution be permanently recorded among the paper of this
Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County, Virginia.
Ayes: Warren, McHale, Barber, Humphrey and Miller.
Nays: None.
03-1054
12/17/03
Mr. McHale presented the executed resolution to Mr. Kalanges,
accompanied by his wife, and expressed appreciation for his
dedicated service on the Solid Waste Advisory Committee.
Mr. Kalanges expressed appreciation to Mr. McHale for the
opportunity to serve the county, and also to the waste and
recovery staff for their extraordinary efforts following
Hurricane Isabel.
15.D. RECO~NIZIN~ MR. PHILLIP ~. CUNNIN~HAM FOR TWELVE
YEARS OF SERVICE ON THE CHESTErfIELD PLANNING
COMMISSION
Mr. Jacobson introduced Mr. Phillip Cunningham who was
present to receive the resolution.
On motion of the Board, the following resolution was adopted:
WHEREAS, Mr. Phillip G. Cunningham diligently and
effectively served Chesterfield County as the Planning
Commissioner from Bermuda District from January 1992 to
December 2003; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Cunningham provided strong leadership on
the shaping of the growth, development and improvement of
Bermuda District and the entire county during these twelve
years; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Cunningham actively worked for the
improvement of the Jefferson Davis Corridor by hosting
community discussions that led to the adoption of the
Jefferson Davis Corridor Plan; developing unique zoning and
development standards for the corridor; and participating in
discussions that resulted in the creation of the Jefferson
Davis Enterprise Zone; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Cunningham actively participated in the
formation and development of the Jefferson Davis Association;
tirelessly participated in its numerous early morning
meetings; and significantly contributed to many of the
association's successful projects; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Cunningham was an active participant in the
zoning and approval of the award winning Winchester Greens
project; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Cunningham diligently worked for the
improvement of the Village of Chester through negotiation and
successful approval of detailed quality development standards
for the Chester Village Green project; the village-style
design standards for the entire village area; the successful
siting of the library adjacent to the village green; and the
renovation of Thomas Dale High School; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Cunningham actively negotiated many zoning
cases, site plan and subdivision appeals which set a quality
standard for the entire Bermuda District; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Cunningham successfully participated in the
community discussion and development of the Riverfront Plan,
Southern Jefferson Davis Corridor Plan, Consolidated Eastern
Area Plan, Southern and Western Area Plan, and related
ordinances; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Cunningham supported numerous planning
projects which improved the quality of life for all county
citizens; among these were public facility plans and
03-1055
12/17/03
projects, water quality plans and standards, park plans and
projects, growth management initiatives, detailed
communication tower standards, and detailed zoning and
subdivision standards; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Cunningham's contribution and leadership on
Planning Commission committees including the sign ordinance
and manufactured home park issues was especially meritorious;
and
WHEREAS, Mr. Cunningham excelled at working with
citizens, developers, and county staff towards the
development of high quality projects for the benefit of
present and future residents.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Chesterfield
County Board of Supervisors, this 17th day of December 2003,
publicly recognizes Mr. Phillip G. Cunningham and honors his
contributions to the citizens of Chesterfield County.
Ayes: Warren, McHale, Barber, Humphrey and Miller.
Nays: None.
Mr. McHale presented the executed resolution to Mr.
Cunningham, accompanied by his wife, and expressed
appreciation for his contributions to the growth and
development of Chesterfield County.
Mr. Cunningham expressed appreciation to the Board for the
privilege of serving on the Planning Commission and also to
county staff and his wife for their support.
15.E.
RECOGNIZING THE HONORABLE JACK MCHALE FOR HIS
DISTINGUISHED SERVICE ON THE CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD
OF SUPERVISORS
On motion of the Board, the following resolution was adopted:
WHEREAS, Mr. Jack McHale was elected to the Chesterfield
County Board of Supervisors representing the Bermuda District
beginning in January 1992 and served continuously until
December 2003, twice winning re-election; and
WHEREAS, Mr. McHale served as Vice Chairman from
January-September 1994 and again in 2003, and as Chairman in
1995; and
WHEREAS, Mr. McHale is widely respected for his
integrity, judgment and commitment to providing his
constituents and all the residents of Chesterfield County
with the best possible local government services at the
lowest possible cost; and
WHEREAS, during his tenure on the Board, Mr. McHale was
instrumental in obtaining Community Block Grant funds for the
Bensley/Bermuda Volunteer Rescue Squad; the Bensley Community
Building expansion; the Bensley Community Center Operations;
Bensley Volunteer Fire Department vehicles; equipment for the
Centralia Fire Department; Communities In Schools; the
Crescent Park Sewer Line Extension; the Jefferson Davis
Enterprise Center; the Winchester Green Child Development
Center; the Regional Community Leadership Program; Youth
Programs and more; and
03-1056
12/17/03
WHEREAS, with Mr. McHale's leadership, important
technoloqy upgrades were accomplished for Bellwood, Bensley,
Gates, Curtis, Ecoff, Enon and Harrowgate elementary schools
and for Chester Middle School, along with Thomas Dale High
School; and
WHEREAS, Mr. McHale initiated streetlight installations,
Parks and Recreation improvements, many community events and
a wide array of other quality-of-life improvements in the
Bermuda District; and
WHEREAS, during his service on the Board, Mr. McHale was
a stalwart advocate for reducing the county's real estate tax
rate, which was reduced twice by the Board of Supervisors;
and
WHEREAS, Mr. McHale has served the county and the region
in such diverse and vital organizations as the Appomattox
Basin Industrial Development Corporation; the James River
Advisory Council; the Carpenter Center Board of Directors;
the Richmond Metropolitan Convention and Visitors Board of
Directors and Executive Committee; the Richmond Regional
Planning District Commission; the Budget and Audit Committee;
the Chesterfield-Colonial Heights Social Services Board; the
School Board Liaison Committee; the Capital Region Airport
Commission; and the Courts Space and Family Courts Committee;
and
WHEREAS, Mr. McHale was instrumental in the opening of
the new Chester Library, the Jefferson Davis District Police
Station and the Small Arms Training Facility used by the
county's Public Safety personnel; and
WHEREAS, during his service on the Board of Supervisors,
important regional projects reached fruition, including the
new Greater Richmond Convention Center, which is the largest
regional center in Virginia; the widening of Chippenham
Parkway from Hull Street Road to Jefferson Davis Highway; the
widening of Chippenham Parkway from Powhite Parkway to Hull
Street Road; new business locations and expansions totaling
nearly $2 billion in new investments and more than 30,000 new
jobs; and
WHEREAS, Mr. McHale was one of the original proponents
of Chesterfield County's ~Total Quality" initiative, which
has led to AAA bond ratings from all three major bond rating
agencies; attainment of the prestigious U. S. Senate
Productivity and Quality Award; the Award for Continuing
Excellence and many other awards; and
WHEREAS, Mr. McHale will conclude his service on the
Board of Supervisors on December 31, 2003.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Chesterfield
Board of Supervisors, this 17tn day of December 2003, on
behalf of the grateful citizens of Chesterfield County,
extends its sincere appreciation to Mr. Jack McHale for his
selfless and dedicated public service, and wishes him much
happiness and continued success in all his endeavors.
Ayes: Warren, McHale, Barber, Humphrey and Miller.
Nays: None.
Mr. Warren presented the executed resolution to Mr. McHale,
accompanied by his wife and son, expressed appreciation for
his 12 years of distinguished service as a member of the
Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors, and wished him well
in the future.
03-1057
12/17/03
Mr. McHale expressed appreciation to Board members, Bermuda
District citizens and his wife for their support.
A standing ovation followed.
15.F. PRESENTATION BY THE JEFFERSON DAVIS ASSOCIATION TO THE
HONORABLE JACK MCHALE
Mr. Bryan Walker presented Mr. McHale with a plaque from the
Jefferson Davis Association in appreciation of his
contributions to the redevelopment of the Jefferson Davis
corridor and his valued service to the community.
Mr. McHale expressed appreciation to the Jefferson Davis
Association for the recognition and also to Mr. Walker his
contributions to the community.
15.G. RECOGNIZING BOY SCOUTS UPON ATTAINING THE RANK OF
EAGLE SCOUT
15.G.1. MATTHEW JUSTIN MELFA, MIDLOTHiAN DISTRICT
On motion of the Board, the following resolution was adopted:
WHEREAS, the Boy Scouts of America was incorporated by
Mr. William D. Boyce on February 8, 1910, and was chartered
by Congress in 1916; and
WHEREAS, the Boy Scouts of America was founded to build
character, provide citizenship training and promote physical
fitness; and
WHEREAS, after earning at least twenty-one merit badges
in a wide variety of skills including leadership, service and
outdoor life, serving in a leadership position in a troop,
carrying out a service project beneficial to his community,
being active in the troop, demonstrating Scout spirit, and
living up to the Scout Oath and Law; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Matthew Justin Melfa, Troop 829, sponsored
by Saint Matthias' Episcopal Church, has accomplished those
high standards of commitment and has reached the long-sought
goal of Eagle Scout, which is earned by only four percent of
those individuals entering the Scouting movement; and
WHEREAS, growing through his experiences in Scouting,
learning the lessons of responsible citizenship, and
endeavoring to prepare himself for a role as a leader in
society, Matthew has distinguished himself as a member of a
new generation of prepared young citizens of whom we can all
be very proud.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Chesterfield
County Board of Supervisors, this 17th day of December 2003,
publicly recognizes Mr. Matthew Justin Melfa, extends
congratulations on his attainment of Eagle Scout, and
acknowledges the good fortune of the County to have such an
outstanding young man as one of its citizens.
Ayes: Warren, McHale, Barber, Humphrey and Miller.
Nays: None.
(It is noted Mr. Melfa was unable to attend the meeting and
the resolution and patch will be forwarded to him.)
03-1058
12/17/03
15.G.2. BRENT ALEXANDER MATHISEN, MIDLOTHIAN DISTRICT
Mr. Hammer introduced Mr. Brent Mathisen who was present to
receive the resolution.
On motion of the Board, the following resolution was adopted:
WHEREAS, the Boy Scouts of America was incorporated by
Mr. William D. Boyce on February 8, 1910, and was chartered
by Congress in 1916; and
WHEREAS, the Boy Scouts of America was founded to build
character, provide citizenship training and promote physical
fitness; and
WHEREAS, after earning at least twenty-one merit badges
in a wide variety of skills including leadership, service and
outdoor life, serving in a leadership position in a troop,
carrying out a service project beneficial to his community,
being active in the troop, demonstrating Scout spirit, and
living up to the Scout Oath and Law; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Brent Alexander Mathisen, Troop 876,
sponsored by Mount Pisgah United Methodist Church, has
accomplished those high standards of commitment and has
reached the long-sought goal of Eagle Scout, which is earned
by only four percent of those individuals entering the
Scouting movement; and
WHEREAS, growing through his experiences in Scouting,
learning the lessons of responsible citizenship, and
endeavoring to prepare himself for a role as a leader in
society, Brent has distinguished himself as a member of a new
generation of prepared young citizens of whom we can all be
very proud.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Chesterfield
County Board of Supervisors, this 17th day of December 2003,
publicly recognizes Mr. Brent Alexander Mathisen, extends
congratulations on his attainment of Eagle Scout, and
acknowledges the good fortune of the County to have such an
outstanding young man as one of its citizens.
Ayes: Warren, McHale, Barber, Humphrey and Miller.
Nays: None.
Mr. McHale and Mrs. Humphrey presented the executed
resolution and patch to Mr. Mathisen, congratulated him on
his outstanding achievement, and wished him well in his
future endeavors.
Mr. Mathisen expressed appreciation to the Board for the
recognition and also to his parents, Scoutmasters, friends
and others for their support.
15.G.3. MICHAEL GILBERT MCDONOUGH, MIDLOTHIAN DISTRICT
Mr. Hammer introduced Mr. Michael McDonough who was present
to receive the resolution.
03-1059
12/17/03
On motion of the Board, the following resolution was adopted:
WHEREAS, the Boy Scouts of America was incorporated by
Mr. William D. Boyce on February 8, 1910, and was chartered
by Congress in 1916; and
WHEREAS, the Boy Scouts of America was founded to build
character, provide citizenship training and promote physical
fitness; and
WHEREAS, after earning at least twenty-one merit badges
in a wide variety of skills including leadership, service and
outdoor life, serving in a leadership position in a troop,
carrying out a service project beneficial to his community,
being active in the troop, demonstrating Scout spirit, and
living up to the Scout Oath and Law; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Michael Gilbert McDonough, Troop 876,
sponsored by Mount Pisgah United Methodist Church, has
accomplished those high standards of commitment and has
reached the long-sought goal of Eagle Scout, which is earned
by only four percent of those individuals entering the
Scouting movement; and
WHEREAS, growing through his experiences in Scouting,
learning the lessons of responsible citizenship, and
endeavoring to prepare himself for a role as a leader in
society, Michael has distinguished himself as a member of a
new generation of prepared young citizens of whom we can all
be very proud.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Chesterfield
County Board of Supervisors, this 17th day of December 2003,
publicly recognizes Mr. Michael Gilbert McDonough, extends
congratulations on his attainment of Eagle Scout, and
acknowledges the good fortune of the County to have such an
outstanding young man as one of its citizens.
Ayes: Warren, McHale, Barber, Humphrey and Miller.
Nays: None.
Mr. McHale and Mrs. Humphrey presented the executed
resolution and patch to Mr. McDonough, congratulated him on
his outstanding achievement, and wished him well in his
future endeavors.
Mr. McDonough expressed appreciation to his church, family,
friends and fellow scouts for their support.
15.G.4. ANDREW BRANNING KIRK, MIDLOTHIAN DISTRICT
Mr. Hammer introduced Mr. Andrew Kirk who was present to
receive the resolution.
On motion of the Board, the following resolution was adopted:
WHEREAS, the Boy Scouts of America was incorporated by
Mr. William D. Boyce on February 8, 1910, and was chartered
by Congress in 1916; and
03-1060
12/17/03
WHEREAS, the Boy Scouts of America was founded to build
character, provide citizenship training and promote physical
fitness; and
WHEREAS, after earning at least twenty-one merit badges
in a wide variety of skills including leadership, service and
outdoor life, serving in a leadership position in a troop,
carrying out a service project beneficial to his community,
being active in the troop, demonstrating Scout spirit, and
living up to the Scout Oath and Law; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Andrew Branning Kirk, Troop 876, sponsored
by Mount Pisgah United Methodist Church, has accomplished
those high standards of commitment and has reached the long-
sought goal of Eagle Scout, which is earned by only four
percent of those individuals entering the Scouting movement;
and
WHEREAS, growing through his experiences in Scouting,
learning the lessons of responsible citizenship, and
endeavoring to prepare himself for a role as a leader in
society, Drew has distinguished himself as a member of a new
generation of prepared young citizens of whom we can all be
very proud.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Chesterfield
County Board of Supervisors, this 17th day of December 2003,
publicly recognizes Mr. Andrew Branning Kirk, extends
congratulations on his attainment of Eagle Scout, and
acknowledges the good fortune of the County to have such an
outstanding young man as one of its citizens.
Ayes: Warren, McHale, Barber, Humphrey and Miller.
Nays: None.
Mr. McHale and Mrs. Humphrey presented the executed
resolution and patch to Mr. Kirk, congratulated him on his
outstanding achievement, and wished him well in his future
endeavors.
Mr. Kirk expressed appreciation to his parents and members of
his troop for their support.
15.G.5. MICHAEL ANDREW SIDELL, MATOACA DISTRICT
Mr. Hammer introduced Mr. Michael Sidell who was present to
receive the resolution.
On motion of the Board, the following resolution was adopted:
WHEREAS, the Boy Scouts of America was incorporated by
Mr. William D. Boyce on February 8, 1910, and was chartered
by Congress in 1916; and
WHEREAS, the Boy Scouts of America was founded to build
character, provide citizenship training and promote physical
fitness; and
WHEREAS, after earning at least twenty-one merit badges
in a wide variety of skills including leadership, service and
outdoor life, serving in a leadership position in a troop,
carrying out a service project beneficial to his community,
03-1061
12/1'7/03
being active in the troop, demonstrating Scout spirit, and
living up to the Scout Oath and Law; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Michael Andrew Sidell, Troop 876, sponsored
by Mount Pisgah United Methodist Church, has accomplished
those high standards of commitment and has reached the long-
sought goal of Eagle Scout, which is earned by only four
percent of those individuals entering the Scouting movement;
and
WHEREAS, growing through his experiences in Scouting,
learning the lessons of responsible citizenship, and
endeavoring to prepare himself for a role as a leader in
society, Michael has distinguished himself as a member of a
new generation of prepared young citizens of whom we can all
be very proud.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Chesterfield
County Board of Supervisors, this 17th day of December 2003,
publicly recognizes Mr. Michael Andrew Sidell, extends
congratulations on his attainment of Eagle Scout, and
acknowledges the good fortune of the County to have such an
outstanding young man as one of its citizens.
Ayes: Warren, McHale, Barber, Humphrey and Miller.
Nays: None.
Mr. McHale and Mrs. Humphrey presented the executed
resolution and patch to Mr. Sidell, congratulated him on his
outstanding achievement, and wished him well in his future
endeavors.
Mr. Sidell expressed appreciation to the Board for the
recognition and also to his family, friends and members of
his troop for their support.
15.G.6. THOMAS ANTHONY FLETCHER, JR., MATOACA DISTRICT
Mr. Hammer introduced Mr. Thomas Fletcher,
present to receive the resolution.
Jr., who was
On motion of the Board, the following resolution was adopted:
WHEREAS, the Boy Scouts of America was incorporated by
Mr. William D. Boyce on February 8, 1910, and was chartered
by Congress in 1916; and
WHEREAS, the Boy Scouts of America was founded to build
character, provide citizenship training and promote physical
fitness; and
WHEREAS, after earning at least twenty-one merit badges
in a wide variety of skills including leadership, service and
outdoor life, serving in a leadership position in a troop,
carrying out a service project beneficial to his community,
being active in the troop, demonstrating Scout spirit, and
living up to the Scout Oath and Law; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Thomas Anthony Fletcher, Jr., Troop 890,
sponsored by The Brandermill Church, has accomplished those
high standards of commitment and has reached the long-sought
goal of Eagle Scout, which is earned by only four percent of
those individuals entering the Scouting movement; and
03-1062
12/17/03
WHEREAS, growing through his experiences in Scouting,
learning the lessons of responsible citizenship, and
endeavoring to prepare himself for a role as a leader in
society, Tom has distinguished himself as a member of a new
generation of prepared young citizens of whom we can all be
very proud.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Chesterfield
County Board of Supervisors, this 17th day of December 2003,
publicly recognizes Mr. Thomas Anthony Fletcher, Jr., extends
congratulations on his attainment of Eagle Scout, and
acknowledges the good fortune of the County to have such an
outstanding young man as one of its citizens.
Ayes: Warren, McHale, Barber, Humphrey and Miller.
Nays: None.
Mr. McHale and Mrs. Humphrey presented the executed
resolution and patch to Mr. Fletcher, congratulated him on
his outstanding achievement, and wished him well in his
future endeavors.
Mr. Fletcher expressed appreciation to his parents, friends
and others for their support.
15.G.7. MATTHEW WILLIAM PIPER, CLOVERHILL DISTRICT
Mr. Hammer introduced Mr. Matthew Piper who was present to
receive the resolution.
On motion of the Board, the following resolution was adopted:
WHEREAS, the Boy Scouts of America was incorporated by
Mr. William D. Boyce on February 8, 1910, and was chartered
by Congress in 1916; and
WHEREAS, the Boy Scouts of America was founded to build
character, provide citizenship training and promote physical
fitness; and
WHEREAS, after earning at least twenty-one merit badges
in a wide variety of skills including leadership, service and
outdoor life, serving in a leadership position in a troop,
carrying out a service project beneficial to his community,
being active in the troop, demonstrating Scout spirit, and
living up to the Scout Oath and Law; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Matthew William Piper, Troop 890, sponsored
by The Brandermill Church, has accomplished those high
standards of commitment and has reached the long-sought goal
of Eagle Scout, which is earned by only four percent of those
individuals entering the Scouting movement; and
WHEREAS, growing through his experiences in Scouting,
learning the lessons of responsible citizenship, and
endeavoring to prepare himself for a role as a leader in
society, Matthew has distinguished himself as a member of a
new generation of prepared young citizens of whom we can all
be very proud.
03-1063
12/17/03
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Chesterfield
County Board of Supervisors, this 17th day of December 2003,
publicly recognizes Mr. Matthew William Piper, extends
congratulations on his attainment of Eagle Scout, and
acknowledges the good fortune of the County to have such an
outstanding young man as one of its citizens.
Ayes: Warren, McHale, Barber, Humphrey and Miller.
Nays: None.
Mr. McHale and Mrs. Humphrey presented the executed
resolution and patch to Mr. Piper, congratulated him on his
outstanding achievement, and wished him well in his future
endeavors.
Mr. Piper expressed appreciation to his family, scout leaders
and others for their support.
15.G.8. BRANDON-WILLIAM DAVID HAWKINS, BERMUDA DISTRICT
Mr. Hammer introduced Mr. Brandon-William Hawkins who was
present to receive the resolution.
On motion of the Board, the following resolution was adopted:
WHEREAS, the Boy Scouts of America was incorporated by
Mr. William D. Boyce on February 8, 1910, and was chartered
by Congress in 1916; and
WHEREAS, the Boy Scouts of America was founded to build
character, provide citizenship training and promote physical
fitness; and
WHEREAS, after earning at least twenty-one merit badges
in a wide variety of skills including leadership, service and
outdoor life, serving in a leadership position in a troop,
carrying out a service project beneficial to his community,
being active in the troop, demonstrating Scout spirit, and
living up to the Scout Oath and Law; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Brandon-William David Hawkins, Troop 819,
sponsored by Saint John's Episcopal Church, has accomplished
those high standards of commitment and has reached the long-
sought goal of Eagle Scout, which is earned by only four
percent of those individuals entering the Scouting movement;
and
WHEREAS, growing through his experiences in Scouting,
learning the lessons of responsible citizenship, and
endeavoring to prepare himself for a role as a leader in
society, Brandon has distinguished himself as a member of a
new generation of prepared young citizens of whom we can all
be very proud.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Chesterfield
County Board of Supervisors, this 17th day of December 2003,
publicly recognizes Mr. Brandon-William David Hawkins,
extends congratulations on his attainment of Eagle Scout, and
acknowledges the good fortune of the County to have such an
outstanding young man as one of its citizens.
Ayes: Warren, McHale, Barber, Humphrey and Miller.
Nays: None.
03-1064
12/17/03
Mr. McHale and Mrs. Humphrey presented the executed
resolution and patch to Mr. Hawkins, congratulated him on his
outstanding achievement, and wished him well in his future
endeavors.
Mr. Hawkins expressed appreciation to his family, Scoutmaster
and members of his troop for their support.
15.G.9. GERALD TROY BEDFORD, BERMUDA DISTRICT
Mr. Hammer introduced Mr. Gerald Bedford who was present to
receive the resolution.
On motion of the Board, the following resolution was adopted:
WHEREAS, the Boy Scouts of America was incorporated by
Mr. William D. Boyce on February 8, 1910, and was chartered
by Congress in 1916; and
WHEREAS, the Boy Scouts of America was founded to build
character, provide citizenship training and promote physical
fitness; and
WHEREAS, after earning at least twenty-one merit badges
in a wide variety of skills including leadership, service and
outdoor life, serving in a leadership position in a troop,
carrying out a service project beneficial to his community,
being active in the troop, demonstrating Scout spirit, and
living up to the Scout Oath and Law; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Gerald Troy Bedford, Troop 886, sponsored
by Trinity United Methodist Church, has accomplished those
high standards of commitment and has reached the long-sought
goal of Eagle Scout, which is earned by only four percent of
those individuals entering the Scouting movement; and
WHEREAS, growing through his experiences in Scouting,
learning the lessons of responsible citizenship, and
endeavoring to prepare himself for a role as a leader in
society, Gerald has distinguished himself as a member of a
new generation of prepared young citizens of whom we can all
be very proud.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Chesterfield
County Board of Supervisors, this 17th day of December 2003,
publicly recognizes Mr. Gerald Troy Bedford, extends
congratulations on his attainment of Eagle Scout, and
acknowledges the good fortune of the County to have such an
outstanding young man as one of its citizens.
Ayes: Warren, McHale, Barber, Humphrey and Miller.
Nays: None.
Mr. McHale and Mrs. Humphrey presented the executed
resolution and patch to Mr. Bedford, congratulated him on his
outstanding achievement, and wished him well in his future
endeavors.
Mr. Bedford expressed appreciation
scoutmaster for their support.
to his parents and
03-1065
12/17/03
15.G.10. MATTHEW RYAN DEFIBAUGH, DALE DISTRICT
Mr. Hammer introduced Mr. Matthew Defibaugh who was present
to receive the resolution.
On motion of the Board, the following resolution was adopted:
WHEREAS, the Boy Scouts of America was incorporated by
Mr. William D. Boyce on February 8, 1910, and was chartered
by Congress in 1916; and
WHEREAS, the Boy Scouts of America was founded to build
character, provide citizenship training and promote physical
fitness; and
WHEREAS, after earning at least twenty-one merit badges
in a wide variety of skills including leadership, service and
outdoor life, serving in a leadership position in a troop,
carrying out a service project beneficial to his community,
being active in the troop, demonstrating Scout spirit, and
living up to the Scout Oath and Law; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Matthew Ryan Defibaugh, Troop 886,
sponsored by Trinity United Methodist Church, has
accomplished those high standards of commitment and has
reached the long-sought goal of Eagle Scout, which is earned
by only four percent of those individuals entering the
Scouting movement; and
WHEREAS, growing through his experiences in Scouting,
learning the lessons of responsible citizenship, and
endeavoring to prepare himself for a role as a leader in
society, Matthew has distinguished himself as a member of a
new generation of prepared young citizens of whom we can all
be very proud.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Chesterfield
County Board of Supervisors, this 17th day of December 2003,
publicly recognizes Mr. Matthew Ryan Defibaugh, extends
congratulations on his attainment of Eagle Scout, and
acknowledges the good fortune of the County to have such an
outstanding young man as one of its citizens.
Ayes: Warren, McHale, Barber, Humphrey and Miller.
Nays: None.
Mr. McHale and Mrs. Humphrey presented the executed
resolution and patch to Mr. Defibaugh, congratulated him on
his outstanding achievement, and wished him well in his
future endeavors.
Mr. Defibaugh expressed appreciation to his family, fellow
scouts and others for their support.
15.~.11. SHANE MICHAEL ROWLEY, DALE DISTRICT
Mr. Hammer introduced Mr. Shane Rowley who was present to
receive the resolution.
On motion of the Board, the following resolution was adopted:
03-1066
12/17/03
WHEREAS, the Boy Scouts of America was incorporated by
Mr. William D. Boyce on February 8, 1910, and was chartered
by Congress in 1916; and
WHEREAS, the Boy Scouts of America was founded to build
character, provide citizenship training and promote physical
fitness; and
WHEREAS, after earning at least twenty-one merit badges
in a wide variety of skills including leadership, service and
outdoor life, serving in a leadership position in a troop,
carrying out a service project beneficial to his community,
being active in the troop, demonstrating Scout spirit, and
living up to the Scout Oath and Law; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Shane Michael Rowley, Troop 886, sponsored
by Trinity United Methodist Church, has accomplished those
high standards of commitment and has reached the long-sought
goal of Eagle Scout, which is earned by only four percent of
those individuals entering the Scouting movement; and
WHEREAS, growing through his experiences in Scouting,
learning the lessons of responsible citizenship, and
endeavoring to prepare himself for a role as a leader in
society, Shane has distinguished himself as a member of a new
generation of prepared young citizens oil whom we can all be
very proud.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Chesterfield
County Board of Supervisors, this 17th day of December 2003,
publicly recognizes Mr. Shane Michael Rowley, extends
congratulations on his attainment of Eagle Scout, and
acknowledges the good fortune of the County to have such an
outstanding young man as one of its citizens.
Ayes: Warren, McHale, Barber, Humphrey and Miller.
Nays: None.
Mr. McHale and Mrs. Humphrey presented the executed
resolution and patch to Mr. Rowley, congratulated him on his
outstanding achievement, and wished him well in his future
endeavors.
Mr. Rowley expressed appreciation to his family,
leaders, fellow scouts and others for their support.
scout
16. REQUESTS FOR MOBILE HOME PERMITS AND REZONING PLACED ON
THE CONSENT AGENDA TO BE HEARD IN THE FOLLOWING ORDER~
- WITHDRAWALS/DEFERRALS - CASES WHERE THE APPLICANT
ACCEPTS THE RECOMMENDATION AND THERE IS NO OPPOSITION
- CASES WHERE THE APPLICANT DOES NOT ACCEPT THE
RECOMMENDATION AND/OR THERE IS PUBLIC OPPOSITION WILL BE
HEARD AT SECTION 18
03SN0200
In Matoaca Magisterial District, ROCK VIEW HOMES, INC.
requests rezoning and amendment of zoning district map from
Agricultural (A) and Residential (R-7) to Residential (R-12)
with Conditional Use Planned Development to permit exceptions
to Ordinance requirements. Residential use of up to 3.63
units per acre is permitted in a Residential (R-12) District.
03-1067
12/17/03
The density of such amendment will be controlled by zoning
conditions or Ordinance standards. The Comprehensive Plan
suggests the property is appropriate for single family
residential use of 2 units per acre or less. This request
lies on 157.6 acres fronting in two (2) places for a total of
approximately 550 feet on the west line of 0tterdale Road,
approximately 600 feet south of Broadmoore Road. Tax IDs
707-682-4055, 708-681-7138 and 708-683-1628 and 6612 (Sheets
8, 9, 14 and 15).
Mr. Jacobson presented a summary of Case 03SN0200 and stated
the applicant has requested a deferral until January 28,
2004.
Mr. John Easter, representing the applicant,
deferral until January 28, 2004.
requested a
Mr. Warren called for public comment.
No one came forward to speak to the deferral.
On motion of Mrs. Humphrey, seconded by Mr. Barber, the Board
deferred Case 03SN0200 until January 28, 2004.
Ayes: Warren, McHale, Barber, Humphrey and Miller.
Nays: None.
04SN0107
In Dale Magisterial District, JACOBS GLENN LC requests
amendment to zoning (Case 00SN0266) and amendment of zoning
district map to eliminate the requirement to provide an
emergency access. The density of such amendment will be
controlled by zoning conditions or Ordinance standards. The
Comprehensive Plan suggests the property is appropriate for
residential use of 1.0 to 2.5 units per acre. This request
lies in a Residential (R-12) District on 30.0 acres fronting
approximately 800 feet on the west line of Newbys Bridge Road
approximately 100 feet south of Valencia Road, also lying at
the eastern terminus of Jacobs Bend Drive. Tax ID 759-684-
2733 (Sheet 11).
Mr. Jacobson stated Mr. Miller is requesting a deferral until
March 10, 2004.
Ms. Kristen Keatley, representing the applicant, stated that
the deferral is acceptable.
Mr. Warren called for public comment.
No one came forward to speak to the deferral.
Mr. Miller stated he is requesting a deferral until the Board
has had an opportunity to consider the subdivision
connectivity policy because it may be relative to this case.
Mr. Miller then made a motion, seconded by Mr. Warren, for
the Board to defer Case 04SN0107 until March 10, 2004.
Ayes: Warren, McHale, Barber, Humphrey and Miller.
Nays: None.
03-1068
12/17/03
03SN0298
In Clover Hill Magisterial District, HUGH OWENS requests
rezoning and amendment of zoning district map from
Agricultural (A) to Residential (R-12). Residential use of
up to 3.63 units per acre is permitted in a Residential (R-
12) District. The Comprehensive Plan suggests the property
is appropriate for residential use of 2.2 units per acre or
less. This request lies on 20.4 acres fronting approximately
650 feet on the east line of South Old Hundred Road,
approximately 450 feet south of Echo Ridge Drive. Tax ID
732-682-2226 (Sheet 10).
Mr. Jacobson presented a summary of Case 03SN0298 and stated
the Planning Commission and staff recommend approval and
acceptance of the proffered conditions. He noted the request
conforms to the Upper Swift Creek Plan.
Ms. Kristen Keatley, representing the applicant, stated the
recommendation is acceptable.
Mr. Warren called for public comment.
No one came forward to speak to the request.
On motion of Mr. Warren, seconded by Mr. McHale, the Board
approved Case 03SN0298 and accepted the following proffered
conditions:
1. Public water and wastewater shall be used. (U)
o
The applicant, subdivider, or assignee(s) shall pay the
following, for infrastructure improvements within the
service district for the property, to the county of
Chesterfield prior to the issuance of building permit:
ao
$9,000.00 per dwelling unit, if paid prior to July
1, 2003; or
bo
The amount approved by the Board of Supervisors not
to exceed $9,000.00 per dwelling unit adjusted
upward by any increase in the Marshall and Swift
building cost index between July 1, 2002, and July
1 of the fiscal year in which the payment is made
if paid after June 30, 2003.
In the event the cash payment is not used for which
proffered within 15 years of receipt, the cash
shall be returned in full to the payor. (B&M)
The maximum density of this development shall not exceed
31 total lots. Lots accessing solely through Echo Ridge
Subdivision shall be limited to four (4) lots. (P)
Except for timbering approved by the Virginia State
Department of Forestry for the purpose of removing dead
or diseased trees, there shall be no timbering on the
Property until a land disturbance permit has been
obtained from the Environmental Engineering Department
and the approved devices installed. (EE)
Direct access from the property to Old Hundred Road
shall be limited to one (1) public road. The exact
03-1069
12/17/03
o
o
10.
11.
12.
location of this access shall be approved by
Transportation Department. (T)
the
In conjunction with recordation of the initial
subdivision plat, forty-five (45) feet of right of way
along the east side of Old Hundred Road, measured from
the centerline of that part of Old Hundred Road
immediately adjacent to the property, shall be
dedicated, free and unrestricted, to and for the benefit
of Chesterfield County. (T)
To provide an adequate roadway system at the time of
complete development, the owner/developer shall be
responsible for the following:
Construction of additional pavement along 01d
Hundred Road at each approved access to provide
right and left turn lanes, if warranted, based on
Transportation Department standards;
bo
Dedication to Chesterfield County, free and
unrestricted, of any additional right-of-way (or
easements) required for the improvements identified
above. (T)
Prior to any construction plan approval, a phasing plan
for the required road improvements, as identified in
Proffered Condition 7, shall be submitted to and
approved by the Transportation Department. (T)
Ail exposed portions of the foundation of each dwelling
unit shall be faced with brick or stone veneer. Exposed
piers supporting front porches shall be faced with brick
or stone veneer. (P)
The minimum gross floor area for one story dwelling
units shall be 1800 square feet and dwelling units with
more than one story shall have a minimum gross floor
area of 2000 square feet. (BI)
A fifteen (15) foot tree preservation strip shall be
maintained along the Southern property line, adjacent to
GPIN 732-681-4585. Utility easements shall be permitted
to cross this strip in a perpendicular fashion. Any
healthy trees that are six (6) inches in caliper or
greater shall be retained within this tree preservation
strip except where removal is necessary to accommodate
the improvements permitted by the preceding sentence.
This condition shall not preclude the removal of
vegetation from the tree preservation strip that is
unhealthy, dying or diseased. (P)
Prior to tentative subdivision approval, a Phase I
archeological survey shall be performed in accordance
with Archeology and Historic Preservation; Secretary of
the Interior's Standards and Guidelines and provided to
the Chesterfield County Parks and Recreation Department.
(P&R)
13.
Prior to subdivision recordation, the property located
to the north of the intermittent stream (approximately
2.0 acres) shall be dedicated as open space to the Old
Hundred Mill Homeowners Association. (P)
Ayes: Warren, McHale, Barber, Humphrey and Miller.
Nays: None.
03 -1070
12/17/03
04SN0129
In Bermuda Magisterial District, JAMES E. AND BRENDA F.
BRIGGS request rezoning and amendment of zoning district map
from Community Business (C-3) to General Business (C-5). The
density of such amendment will be controlled by zoning
conditions or Ordinance standards. The Comprehensive Plan
suggests the property is appropriate for general commercial
use. This request lies on 0.9 acre lying approximately 310
feet off the west line of Jefferson Davis Highway,
approximately 220 feet north of Southland Drive. Tax ID 798-
655-Part of 2809 (Sheet 26).
Mr. Jacobson presented a summary of Case 04SN0129 and stated
the Planning Commission and staff recommended approval and
acceptance of one proffered condition. He noted the request
conforms to the Chester Village Plan.
Mrs. Brenda Briggs stated the recommendation is acceptable.
Mr. Warren called for public comment.
No one came forward to speak to the request.
On motion of Mr. McHale, seconded by Mrs. Humphrey, the Board
approved Case 04SN0129 and accepted the following proffered
condition:
The public water system shall be used. (U)
Ayes: Warren, McHale, Barber, Humphrey and Miller.
Nays: None.
04SN0134
In Midlothian Magisterial District, FOX RICHMOND GROUP LLC
requests Conditional Use and amendment of zoning district map
to permit an outside public address system. The density of
such amendment will be controlled by zoning conditions or
Ordinance standards. The Comprehensive Plan suggests the
property is appropriate for regional mixed use. This request
lies on 1.6 acres lying approximately 240 feet off the south
line of Robious Road, east of Huguenot Road. Tax ID 740-714-
8131 (Sheet 2).
Mr. Jacobson presented a summary of Case 04SN0134 and stated
the Planning Commission and staff recommend approval subject
to one condition.
Ms. Kristen Keatley, representing the applicant, stated the
recommendation is acceptable.
Mr. Warren called for public comment.
No one came forward to speak to the request.
On motion of Mr. Barber, seconded by Mr. Miller, the Board
approved Case 04SN0134 subject to the following condition:
03-1071
12/17/03
An outside public address system shall be permitted as
accessory to restaurant uses. Such systems shall be limited
to outdoor seating and dining areas. Such system shall not
be audible to any property located in an A, R, R-TH or R-MF
District. (P)
Ayes: Warren, McHale, Barber, Humphrey and Miller.
Nays: None.
04SN0150
In Bermuda Magisterial District, AFFORDABLE RESIDENCES IN
CHESTERFIELD, II requests amendment to Conditional Use
Planned Development (Case 97SN0180) and amendment of zoning
district map relative to density, parking and maximum number
of units. The density of such amendment will be controlled
by zoning conditions or Ordinance standards. The
Comprehensive Plan suggests the property is appropriate for
multifamily residential use of 7.01 or more units per acre.
This request lies on 26.3 acres lying approximately 600 feet
on the north line of Alcott Road approximately 500 feet west
of Jefferson Davis Highway. Tax ID 789-678-Part of 8292
(Sheet 18).
Mr. Jacobson presented a summary of Case 04SN0150 and stated
the Planning Commission and staff recommended approval
subject to one condition and acceptance of one proffered
condition.
Mr. T. K. Somanath, representing the applicant, stated the
recommendation is acceptable. He expressed appreciation to
Mr. McHale for his support of the Jefferson Davis Corridor,
especially the Winchester Greens revitalization.
Mr. Warren called for public comment.
No one came forward to speak to the request.
After brief discussion, on motion of Mr. McHale, seconded by
Mrs. Humphrey, the Board approved Case 04SN0150 subject to
the following condition:
The following exceptions shall be granted for any multifamily
residential development on the property:
so
a 1.8 unit per acre exception to the maximum ten
(10) units per acre density limitation; and
b. a 1.1 parking space per unit exception to the
required two (2) parking spaces per unit
requirement. (P)
(Note: Ail other requirements for multifamily residential
development, as approved with Case 97SN0180, shall be
adhered to.)
And, further,
condition:
the Board accepted the following proffered
The number of dwelling units permitted shall be limited to
310 units, provided that 240 of those units shall be
unrestricted in regards to the age of residents and seventy
03-1072
12/17/03
(70) shall be restricted, except as otherwise prohibited by
the Virginia Fair Housing Law, the Federal Housing Law, and
such other applicable federal, state or local legal
requirements, to "housing for older persons" as defined in
the Virginia Fair Housing Law and shall have no persons under
19 years of age domiciled therein ("Age Restricted Dwelling
Units"). (P & B&M)
(Note: This condition supersedes Proffered Condition 4 of
Case 97SN0180. All other proffered conditions shall remain
in effect.)
Ayes: Warren, McHale, Barber, Humphrey and Miller.
Nays: None.
04SN0169
In Matoaca Magisterial District, TASCON-NORWOOD L.L.C.
requests amendment to Conditional Use Planned Development
(Case 01SN0267) and amendment of zoning district map to
permit exceptions to building and construction materials
requirements and requirements for sidewalks and walkways.
Residential use of up to 10 units per acre is permitted in a
Multifamily Residential (R-MF) District. The Comprehensive
Plan suggests the property is appropriate for community mixed
use with residential densities of 8 to 14 units per acre and
for single family residential use of 2.0 units per acre or
less. This request lies on 27.4 acres fronting approximately
1,350 feet on the west line of North Spring Run Road, also
fronting approximately 1,400 feet on the north line of
McEnnally Road and located in the northwest quadrant of the
intersection of these roads. Tax ID 724-670-5538 (Sheet
15).
Mr. Jacobson presented a summary of Case 04SN0169 and stated
the Planning Commission and staff recommend approval subject
to one condition and acceptance of one proffered condition.
Mr. Steve Settlage, representing the applicant, stated the
recommendation is acceptable.
Mr. Warren called for public comment.
No one came forward to speak to the request.
On motion of Mrs. Humphrey, seconded by Mr. Barber, the Board
approved Case 04SN0169 subject to the following condition:
Sidewalks, Walkways, and Pedestrian Trails. Sidewalks having
a width of three (3) feet shall be provided generally along
both sides of all interior streets, but not along driveways
serving only one or two buildings; provided that, along that
portion of the internal street that generally parallels
McEnnally Road, as shown on the Schematic Plan, if
topographic and dimensional constraints between McEnnally
Road and the pond make provision of sidewalks on both sides
of the street impractical, a sidewalk may be placed on only
one side of that portion of the street. Sidewalks shall also
be provided along the entrance road to North Spring Run Road
and to the adjacent property to the north, identified as Tax
ID 725-671-9228. Walkways shall be provided from the
driveways for individual buildings to the entrances of all
03-1073
12/17/03
dwelling units. Sidewalks and walkways shall be constructed
of exposed aggregate, stamped concrete or masonry pavers.
Walkways to the front doors of the homes shall be of broom
finished concrete. Pedestrian trails shall be provided
around the pond with connections to.the clubhouse area and to
the major internal streets. The exact treatment and location
of these sidewalks and pedestrian trails shall be approved by
the Planning Department at the time of site plan review. (P)
(Note: This condition supersedes Condition 3 of Case
01SN0267.)
And, further,
condition:
the Board accepted the following proffered
Schematic Plan and Elevations. Development of the Property
shall be in substantial conformance with the architectural
appearance shown on the elevations attached hereto as
Exhibits UA" and ~B" with respect to the materials depicted,
which are brick veneer, stone or faux stone (cultured stone),
composition or vinyl siding and 20 year asphalt roof
shingles. Development of the Property shall generally
conform to the Schematic Plan with respect to the general
location of the clubhouse building, open spaces, the
orientation of buildings such that the number of garage doors
opening to any individual street are minimized, and the
clustering of buildings. The location of roads, access,
driveways and parking areas need not be exactly as shown on
the Schematic Plan; however, the concepts of the Plan shall
be generally adhered to such as the orientation of dwelling
units to one another, to open spaces, and to rights of way.
(P)
(Staff Note: This proffered condition supersedes Proffered
Condition 5 of Case 01SN0267. The Exhibits referred to are
contained in Case 01SN0267.)
Ayes: Warren, McHale, Barber, Humphrey and Miller.
Nays: None.
04SN0113
In Matoaca Magisterial District, GLENN M. HILL requests
rezoning and amendment of zoning district map from
Agricultural (A) to Residential (R-12). Residential use of
up to 3.63 units per acre is permitted in a Residential (R-
12) District. The Comprehensive Plan suggests the property
is appropriate for residential use on 1-5 acre lots, suited
to R-88 zoning. This request lies on 20.0 acres fronting
approximately 1,000 feet on the east line of Bailey Bridge
Road, approximately 550 feet south of Battlecreek Drive. Tax
ID 735-670-7636 (Sheet 16).
At Mrs. Humphrey's request, Mr. Warren inquired if anyone was
present to speak to Case 04SN0113. Seeing no one, he called
for the applicant to come forward and the case to be heard on
the consent agenda.
Mr. Delmonte Lewis, representing the applicant, stated the
proposal is for an extension of an existing subdivision;
water and sewer is available; and the applicant has addressed
the impact on capital facilities as well as agreed to provide
03-1074
12/17/03
1,000 feet of road improvements. He requested that the Board
approve the request as recommended by the Planning
Commission.
Mr. Warren called for public comment.
No one came forward to speak to the request.
Mrs. Humphrey stated the applicant has agreed to provide
improvements to a dangerous curve on Bailey Bridge Road and
the development will provide for a second access for the
Winterpock Fire Department to reach the Bayhill Pointe
community.
Mrs. Humphrey then made a motion, seconded by Mr. McHale, for
the Board to approve Case 04SN0113 and accept the following
proffered conditions:
1. Public water and wastewater systems shall be used. (U)
o
With the exception of timbering which has been approved
by the Virginia State Department of Forestry for the
purpose of removing dead diseased trees, there shall be
no timbering on the Property until a Land Disturbance
Permit has been obtained from the Environmental
Engineering Department and the approved devices have
been installed. (EE)
The applicant, subdivider, or assignee(s) shall pay the
following, for infrastructure improvements within the
service district for the property, to the County of
Chesterfield prior to the issuance of building permit:
so
$9,000.00 per dwelling unit, if paid prior to July
1, 2003; or
The amount approved by the Board of Supervisors not
to exceed $9,000.00 per dwelling unit adjusted
upward by any increase in the Marshall and Swift
building cost index between July 1, 2002, and July
1, of the fiscal year in which the payment is made
if paid after June 30, 2003.
C ·
In the event the cash payment is not used for which
proffered within 15 years of receipt, the cash
shall be returned in full to the payor. (B&M)
o
No more than 27 residential lots shall be developed on
the subject property. (P)
Minimum House Size:
Ail dwelling units shall have a minimum gross floor area
of 1,700 square feet except for dwelling units with more
than one story which shall have a minimum gross floor
area of 2,000 sq. feet. (P)
6. Minimum lot area shall be 15,000 square feet. (P)
o
Direct access from the property to Bailey Bridge Road
shall be limited to ()ne (1) Public Road. The exact
location of that access shall be approved by the
Transportation Department. (T)
03-1075
12/17/03
Right of Way Dedication:
In conjunction with the recordation of the initial
subdivision plat or within sixty (60) days of a written
request by the County, forty-five (45) feet of right-of-
way on the east side of Bailey Bridge Road, measured
from the centerline of the part of Bailey Bridge Road
immediately adjacent to the property; shall be
dedicated, free and unrestricted, to and for the benefit
of Chesterfield County. (T)
Construction:
The applicant, subdivider or assignee(s) shall: (1)
dedicate the required right-of-way and construct
additional pavement along Bailey Bridge Road at the
approved access point to provide left and right turn
lanes if warranted, based on Transportation Department
standards. In the event the Developer is unable to
acquire the right-of-way necessary for the road
improvements as described, the Developer may request, in
writing, the County to acquire such right-of-way as a
public road improvement. All costs associated with the
acquisition of the right-of-way shall be borne by the
Developer. In the event the County chooses not to
assist the Developer in acquisition of the "off-site"
right-of-way, the Developer shall be relieved of the
obligation to acquire the "off-site" right-of-way, and
only provide the road improvement that can be
accommodated within available right-of-way as determined
by the Transportation Department; and (2) Construct
additional pavement and shoulder along the south side of
Bailey Bridge Road to provide an eleven (11) foot wide
travel lane, measured from the centerline of the road,
with an additional one (1) foot wide paved shoulder plus
a seven (7) foot wide unpaved shoulder, with any
modifications approved by the Transportation Department
for the entire property frontage. (T)
10.
Phasing Plan:
Prior to any construction plan approval, a phasing plan
for the required road improvements, as identified in
Proffer 9, shall be submitted to and approved by the
Transportation Department. (T)
Ayes: Warren, McHale, Barber, Humphrey and Miller.
Nays: None.
17. PUBLIC HEARINGS
17.A. TO CONSIDER ORDINANCE AMENDMENTS RELATING TO EROSION
AND SEDIMENT CONTROL
Ms. Joan Salvati, Water Quality Administrator, stated this
date and time has been advertised for a public hearing for
the Board to consider ordinance amendments relating to
erosion and sediment control. She reviewed the basis for the
amendments and the process for developing the revisions. She
then reviewed key revisions, including addition of civil
penalties; a provision for issuance of summonses by
environmental engineering inspectors, with the option of
paying the fine directly to the county treasurer; a
requirement that the land owner and/or permit holder will be
held responsible for clean up of sediment that has affected
03-1076
12/17/03
downstream properties and/or waters; addition of verbiage for
a requirement for the designation of a Responsible Land
Disturber (RLD); responsibilities given to RLDs; a provision
that allows the environmental engineer to request any
additional erosion and sediment control measures deemed
necessary; a strengthened provision regarding changes to the
erosion and sediment control plan; new verbiage calling for
additional erosion and sediment control measures for sites
that are adjacent to sensitive environmental areas; and
additional verbiage clarifying that exemptions for
silviculture and agricultural activities only apply to lands
on which those uses are actually being undertaken. She
stated staff feels the proposed ordinance is a part of an
overall effort to reduce sediment from getting into Swift
Creek Reservoir and the county's streams. She further stated
staff recommends adoption of the ordinance, and stressed the
importance of environmental engineering's inspectors
receiving the county's full support in implementing the
ordinance.
When asked, Ms. Salvati stated the Department of Conservation
and Recreation has requested that the county revise its
ordinance and granted an extension until early January 2004.
Mr. Warren called for public comment.
Mr. Mark Singer, Executive Director of the Richmond Municipal
Contractors Association, stated he supports the proposed
ordinance with the addition of amendments to Sections 8-4 and
8-5 relative to what happens when environmental engineering
staff come to a construction site and request an erosion and
sediment control measure that is beyond the scope of an
originally approved plan. He provided copies of the proposed
amended language to the Board and stated the language
represents a balance between staff's needs and contractors'
needs. He requested that the Board approve the proposed
ordinance with the addition of the amended language to
Sections 8-4 and 8-5.
Mr. David Root, representing the
Association, stated he supports
presented by Mr. Singer.
Richmond Homebuilders
the amended language
Dr. Betty Hunter-Clapp, representing Hands Across the Lake,
provided details of pollution caused by construction
projects. She presented photographs depicting sediment in
the Swift Creek Reservoir and expressed concerns relative to
the effectiveness of turbidity curtains. She also provided
photographs depicting muddy discharge from BMPs and expressed
concerns relative to poor performance of normal erosion and
sediment controls in shrink-swell soils/clays. She further
expressed concerns that if more development occurs in the
area, the problems will worsen and requested that the Board
use the tools provided in the new erosion and sediment
control ordinance to look for causes of sedimentation as well
as relief for those causes. She encouraged the Board to
implement usage of a coagulating agent to combine small clay
particles into larger particles that are trapped by
conventional control measures, indicating that anionic PAM, a
polymer safe for drinking water, is one possibility. She
also urged the Board to increase the penalty for failure to
control runoff pollution.
03-1077
12/17/03
Mr. Warren requested that the Board add an increased penalty
for erosion and sediment control violations to the county's
legislative program.
Ms. Diana Parker, representing the Sierra Club, stated she
supports the proposed ordinance and feels additional action
should be taken to protect the county's drinking water
sources.
Mr. David Robinson, James River Soil and Water Conservation
District Director-elect, requested that the word ~may" be
changed to ~shall" in several sections of the proposed
ordinance. He requested that the Board consider providing
the environmental engineering inspectors with the ability to
issue stop work orders. He stated Henrico County requires
that 100 percent of site runoff go through a mechanical
device. He suggested that the Board consider requiring that
any mitigation of Chesterfield wetlands be within
Chesterfield. He requested that the Board approve the
proposed ordinance tonight and then address other issues that
have been raised.
Discussion ensued relative to Mr. Robinson's requests related
to the proposed ordinance.
When asked, Mr. Micas stated the county has the ability to
streamline the stop work order process, indicating that it
has traditionally been considered appropriate for Mr. Ramsey
to issue stop work orders upon the field inspectors'
determinations.
Mr. Bill Hastings stated he supports the proposed ordinance
as well as the modifications suggested by Mr. Robinson. He
stressed the importance of strict enforcement of the
ordinance.
There being no one else to speak to the ordinance amendments,
the public hearing was closed.
Ms. Salvati stated the use of ~may" rather than ~shall"
provides discretion to environmental inspectors, indicating
that a large percentage of erosion and sediment control
violations are corrected in the field. She further stated
staff feels it is important to provide inspectors with the
option of not providing a summons if a contractor is willing
to address the violation, rather than mandating that a
summons be issued. She further stated the county already
requires that the current erosion and sediment control plans
specify 100 percent of all stormwater runoff is captured by a
device.
Mr. Miller inquired about concerns expressed by the Farm
Bureau.
Ms. Salvati stated staff attempted to craft language to
address the concerns raised by the Farm Bureau. She further
stated the revised language was sent to the Farm Bureau on
November 10, 2003 and staff has not received a reply.
Discussion ensued relative to exemption of
property from the proposed ordinance.
agricultural
Ms. Salvati stated the proposed civil penalty of $100 per day
03-1078
12/17/03
per violation of erosion and sediment control standards is
the same as the state's erosion and sediment control
ordinance.
Mr. Micas stated the current ordinance provides for a
criminal penalty of up to $2,000 for violations of erosion
and sediment control standards.
Mr. Miller expressed concerns relative to the exemption
provided in Section 8-2(f) for state highway projects.
Ms. Salvati stated electric, natural gas and other utility
companies must file erosion and sediment control plans with
the Department of Conservation and Recreation, and the
department is responsible for enforcing violations by utility
companies.
Mr. Miller expressed concerns that the Planning Commission
did not review the proposed ordinance because it affects land
use.
Mrs. Humphrey expressed concerns that the county cannot
enforce erosion and sediment control violations of utility
companies. She also expressed concerns relative to the
language proposed in Section 8-2(c) regarding education level
of the person confirming silvicultural practices.
Ms. Salvati stated the language proposed in the Chesapeake
Bay Preservation Act refers to a ~professional arborist."
She further stated the Forestry Department recommended the
education level, indicating that staff was comfortable with
~professional arborist."
Mrs. Humphrey requested that the language, "person holding a
Bachelor of Science degree in forestry" be replaced with
~professional arborist."
When asked, Ms. Salvati stated horse farms would be deemed
bona fide agricultural uses and thus exempt from the proposed
ordinance. She further stated the clearing of property for
the planting of crops would also be considered a bona fide
agricultural use and also exempt from the ordinance.
Mrs. Humphrey stated both the business community and the
environmental community support the proposed ordinance, but
expressed concerns relative to the issues raised by the Farm
Bureau regarding agricultural land uses.
Ms. Salvati stated staff has attempted to address the Farm
Bureau's concerns regarding exemptions for bona fide
agricultural uses.
Mr. Barber expressed concerns relative to the photographs
presented by Dr. Clapp depicting sedimentation in the
reservoir three days after a significant rainfall.
Ms. Salvati stated sedimentation issues occur as a result of
heavy rainfalls and short periods of time between rain
events, indicating that the erosion and sediment control
devices designed to meet the state's minimum standards are
not designed for heavy storms. She further stated concerns
relative to this issue must be addressed at the state level.
03-1079
12/17/03
Mr. Barber requested that the Board include deletion of the
exemption from the proposed ordinance for state highway
projects in its legislative program.
Discussion, questions and comments ensued relative to the
ineffectiveness of turbidity curtains.
Mr. Barber requested additional information relative to
potential dangers to the county's water supply as a result of
using coagulants such as anionic PAM.
Mr. McElfish stated that research is being done regarding
this issue.
Mr. Warren stated he feels the Board needs to act on the
ordinance now and then revise it in the future as necessary.
When asked, Mr. McElfish stated the Department of
Conservation and Recreation extended the date for the county
to revise its erosion and sediment control ordinance until
January 5, 2004.
Mr. Barber stated he would be more comfortable if the
stakeholders met again to discuss the issues raised during
the public hearing before adopting the ordinance.
When asked, Ms. Salvati stated staff supports the amendments
to Sections 8-5(d) and 8-4(2) requested by Mr. Singer.
Mr. Warren made a motion, seconded by Mrs. Humphrey, for the
Board to adopt the proposed ordinance, including the
amendments to Sections 8-5(d) and 8-4(2) and changing the
language in Section 8-2(c) from "person holding a Bachelor of
Science degree in forestry" to ~professional arborist."
Mr. Barber made a substitute motion, seconded by Mr. Miller,
for the Board to defer consideration of the proposed
amendments to the erosion and sediment control ordinance
until January 14, 2004.
Mr. Miller stated he would actually prefer a longer deferral
period. He further stated he feels the Planning Commission
should have had an opportunity to review the ordinance and he
is still confused about the agricultural exemption. He
stated he would not support changing ~mays" to "shalls" as
requested by Mr. Robinson, and indicated he feels there are
still property rights and other issues that need to be
addressed.
Mr. Micas clarified that another public hearing would be
necessary if the Board were to defer the issue because a new
Board of Supervisors commences January 1, 2004.
Mr. Warren called for a vote on the substitute motion made by
Mr. Barber, seconded by Mr. Miller, for the Board to defer
consideration of the proposed amendments to the erosion and
sediment control ordinance until January 14, 2004 and hold a
new public hearing at that time.
Ayes: Barber and Miller.
Nays: Warren, McHale and Humphrey.
03-~080
12/17/03
Mr. McHale stated he feels the Board should adopt the
proposed ordinance now to become compliant with the state,
and then address the concerns raised at a later time.
Mr. Warren called for a vote on his original motion, seconded
by Mrs. Humphrey, for the Board to adopt the proposed
ordinance, including the amendments to Sections 8-5(d) and 8-
4(2) and changing the language in Section 8-2(c) from ~person
holding a Bachelor of Science degree in forestry" to
"professional arborist,# as follows:
AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE CODE OF THE COUNTY OF
CHESTERFIELD, 1997, AS AMENDED, BY ADDING SECTION 8-1.1 AND
AMENDING AND RE-ENACTING SECTIONS 8-1, 8-2, 8-4, 8-5, 8-6,
8-7, 8-8, 8-9, 8-10, 8-111, 8-12, 8-13, 8-14, 8-15 and 8-17
RELATING TO EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL AND ESTABLISHING
CIVIL PENALTIES FOR VIOLATIONS OF THE ORDINANCE
BE IT ORDAINED
Chesterfield County:
by the Board of Supervisors of
(1) That Chapter 8 of the Code of the County of
Chesterfield, 1997, as amended, is amended and re-enacted to
read as follows:
Sec. 8-1. Definitions.
(a) When used in this chapter, the following terms
shall have the following meanings:
Agreement in lieu of a plan: A contract between the
plan-approving authority and the owner that specifies
conservation measures that must be implemented in the
construction of a single-family residence; this contract may
be executed by the plan-approving authority in lieu of a
formal site plan.
Certificate of occupancy: A certificate of use and
occupancy issued under the Uniform Statewide Building Code,
but not including a temporary certificate of use and
occupancy.
Conservation standards: The standards contained in the
Virginia Erosion and Sediment Control Regulations and in
chapter 3 of the current edition of the Virginia Erosion and
Sediment Control Handbook. for controlling erosion and
sedimentation.
County: The County of Chesterfield.
Department:
Recreation.
The State Department of Conservation and
Designated agent: The person designated by the applicant
for a land-disturbance permit to act on behalf of the
applicant and to accept service of legal process for the
applicant.
Development: A tract of land developed or to be
developed as a single unit under single ownership or unified
control which is to be used for any business or industrial
purpose or a subdivision as defined in Chapter 17 of the
Chesterfield County Code.
03-1081
12/17/03
Environmental engineer: The director of the Chesterfield
County Department of Environmental Engineering or his
designee.
Land Disturbance Permit: A permit issued by the
Department of Environmental Engineering for the clearing,
filling, excavating, grading or transporting of land or for
any combination thereof or for any purpose set forth herein.
When the land disturbing activity is in conjunction with the
construction of a dwelling, the building permit issued by the
Building Official shall be the land disturbance permit.
Plan: The erosion and sediment control plan required by
this chapter and by Va. Code §10.1-560, et. seq.
Program authority: The County of Chesterfield. The
Director of the Department of Environmental Engineering, or
his designee, is the designated authority to administer this
program.
Responsible Land Disturber: The individual designated
in writing by the holder of the land disturbance permit to be
in charge of and responsible for carrying out a land-
disturbing activity covered by an approved plan or an
agreement in lieu of a plan. The responsible land disturber
must hold a certificate of competence as provided by Va. Code
§10.1-561.
Single-family residence, separately built: A dwelling
that is occupied exclusively by one family and that is not
located in a residential subdivision.
Silviculture: Forest management, including but not
limited to the harvesting of timber, the construction of
roads and trails for forest management purposes, and the
preparation of property for reforestation that is conducted
in accordance with the silvicultural best management
practices developed and enforced by the State Forester
pursuant to Va. Code §10.1-1105.
Soil and Water Conservation District: The district or
districts established by the Virginia Soil and Water
Conservation Board pursuant to Va. Code §10.1-506, et. seq.
which includes Chesterfield County.
Stabilized land: Land that will withstand normal
exposure to atmospheric conditions without incurring erosion
damage.
Subdivision: Shall have the same meaning as the term is
given in the county's subdivision ordinance.
(b) When used in this chapter, the following terms shall
have the same meaning as set forth in Va. Code, § 10.1-560:
Applicant
Certified inspector
Certified plan reviewer
Certified program administrator
03-1082
12/17/03
Erosion impact area
Land-disturbing activity
Local Erosion and Sediment Control Program
Owner
Permittee
Person
Plan-approving authority
State waters.
Sec. 8-1.1. AdoDtion of State Erosion Control Regulatlons.
Pursuant to Va. Code § 10-562, Chesterfield County
adopts the Virginia Erosion and Sediment Control Regulations
as the authority that governs the County's local erosion and
sediment control program.
Sec. 8-2. ADproval of land-disturbing activity.
(a) Except as provided in this chapter, no person shall
engage in land-disturbing activity unless the person has
obtained a land disturbance permit from the county and is
displaying the permit on the site where the land disturbing
activity is taking place. No person shall install a septic
tank or drain field in a Resource Management Area as defined
in Chesapeake Bay Preservation Ordinance, unless the person
has obtained a land disturbance permit and is displaying a
permit on the site where the septic tank or drain field is
being installed.
(b) Persons who own, occupy or operate private lands on
which agriculture, horticulture or silviculture is practiced
shall be exempt from the recfuirements of this chapter for all
activity that takes place on that land that is exempt from
the definition of land-disturbing activity set forth in Va.
Code, § 10.1-560. This exemption shall not apply to
silvicultural activities if there is full and continued
compliance with silvicultural best management practices,
developed and enforced by tlhe State Forester pursuant to Va.
Code §10.1-1105, during and after the land disturbing
activity. This exemption shall not apply to land disturbing
activities including the clearing of trees for the purpose of
establishing a residential lawn on land in an agriculturally
zoned district where the use is residential. This exemption
shall also not apply to land which has been rezoned or
converted, or which is proposed to be rezoned or converted,
at the request of the o~er or previous owner from an
agricultural to a residential, commercial or industrial
zoning district or use.
(c) General woodlot management conducted on lands that
are in an agricultural zoning district and in conformance
with sound silvicultural practices as confirmed by the State
Forester or professional arborist shall be exempt from the
requirements of this chapter. For the purposes of this
chapter, general woodlot management does not include the
03-1083
12/17/03
removal of stumps except for logging road and log deck
construction.
(d) The removal of uprooted tree stumps resulting from
storm damage shall also be exempt from the requirements of
this chapter.
(e) Electric, natural gas and telephone utility
companies, interstate and intrastate natural gas pipeline
companies and railroad companies shall be exempt from the
requirements of this chapter for projects that are exempt
from local erosion and sediment control regulation pursuant
to Va. Code, § 10.1-563(D); provided, however, that such
companies shall comply with the filing requirements of Va.
Code, § 10.1-563(D), as enforced by the Department of
Conservation & Recreation.
(f) State agency projects are exempt from the
provisions of this chapter except as provided for in Va. Code
§10.1-564.
o o o
Sec. 8-4. Land-disturbance permits.
(a) The environmental engineer shall not issue a land-
disturbance permit to an applicant who has submitted a land-
disturbance permit application unless:
(1)
The applicant has submitted an erosion and sediment
control plan that has been approved by the
environmental engineer as meeting the conservation
standards;
(2)
The owner and responsible land disturber, as
designated by the owner, who are responsible for
implementing and maintaining the erosion and
sediment control plan certify that they will
perform the erosion and sediment control measures
included in the plan and any other erosion and
sediment control measures deemed necessary by the
environmental engineer. When requested by the
owner, permit holder or responsible land disturber,
the environmental engineer shall provide a written
document to the requesting party identifying what
additional measures not included in the approved
erosion and sediment control plan are necessary,
and shall notify the owner of those additional
measures;
(3)
The applicant has paid the program administration
fee and posted the bond, letter of credit or cash
escrow required by this chapter;
(4)
The applicant has implemented and maintained
adequate erosion and sediment control measures for
any land-disturbing activity that has already taken
place;
(5)
Any site plan or improvement sketch required by the
zoning ordinance has been approved by the county
and, when necessary, by the Virginia Department of
Transportation. However, if the grading, drainage,
03-1084
12/17/03
floodplain erosion and sediment control and
Chesapeake Bay Ordinance requirements have been met
to the satisfaction of environmental engineer and
the site plan has been deemed to be substantially
approved by the site plan review team, the
environmental engineer may issue the land
disturbance permit;
(6)
Any tentative subdivision that is required by the
subdivision ordinance has been approved by the
county and any road and drainage plan that is
required by the subdivision ordinance has been
approved by the county and the Virginia Department
of Transportation;
(7) Copies of the following have been provided:
a. Any wetlands permits that are required by
federal or state law have been issued by the
applicable state and federal regulatory agencies,
or documentation has been submitted to the
environmental engineer from a qualified wetlands
expert, approved by the environmental engineer that
establishes that a wetlands permit is not required
by federal or state law; and
b. A Virginia Pollutant Discharge Elimination
System (VPDES) General Permit Registration
Statement and Permit Fee form (as developed by the
Department of Environmental Quality) for
construction sites of one acre or more, if
required.
(8)
The applicant has appointed a designated agent if
the applicant does not reside in Virginia or is a
corporation or a partnership.
(b) Land-disturbance permits shall remain in effect
until the land-disturbing activity for which the permit was
issued has been completed, as determined by the environmental
engineer, unless the permit provides for a different
effective time period or unless the environmental engineer,
or his designee, revokes the permit.
(c) Any person who engages in land disturbing activity
on land which is more than 2,500 square feet in area but less
than 10,000 square feet in area and that is located in a
Chesapeake Bay preservation area shall be issued a land
disturbance permit if the person has received minor site plan
or improvement sketch approval and if there are no erosion
and sediment control violations on the property, without
having to comply with the provisions of subsection (a).
Sec. 8-5. Monitoring Reports and Inspections.
(a) Ail applicants for land-disturbance permits shall
expressly grant the environmental engineer the right to enter
the property at all reasonable times before and after the
permit is issued for the purpose of inspecting the property
to determine whether the requirements of this chapter and of
the approved erosion and sediment control plan are being met.
The environmental engineer shall allow the owner, permittee
03-1085
12/17/03
or other individuals designated by the owner or permittee to
be present during the inspection.
(b) The environmental engineer may conduct pre-
construction meetings with the contractor in charge of
carrying out the approved plan, and the owner and/or
permittee at the site of the land disturbing activity. The
responsible land disturber shall be present at the pre-
construction meeting.
(c) The environmental engineer shall conduct periodic
inspections of land disturbing activity as required by Va.
Code §10.1-566(A) and in accordance with 4VAC50-30-60.
(d) The environmental engineer shall require the
responsible land disturber to inspect the land disturbing
activity on a regular basis, including prior to and
immediately after any runoff producing storm events, as
determined by the environmental engineer; and shall ensure
compliance with the approved plan and/or any other measures
deemed necessary by the environmental engineer. When
requested by the owner, permit holder or responsible land
disturber, the environmental engineer shall provide a written
document to the requesting party identifying what additional
measurers not included in the approved erosion and sediment
control plan are necessary, and shall notify the owner of
those additional measures.
(e) The environmental engineer may require the
responsible land disturber to maintain records of all
inspections by the responsible land disturber and to
determine whether the measures required in the approved plan
are effective in controlling erosion and sedimentation. Any
such records shall be made available to the environmental
engineer for review. If the environmental engineer
determines that records of the responsible land disturber's
inspections must be maintained, such requirement shall be
incorporated in the construction narrative or requested, or
if the requirement is imposed after issuance of the land
disturbance permit, in writing by the environmental engineer.
(f) The environmental engineer may require the
responsible land disturber to ensure that perimeter control
materials have been delivered or, as applicable, are
available or installed prior to the issuance of a land
disturbance permit.
Sec. 8-6. Erosion and sediment control plans.
(a) Applicants for land-disturbance permits shall
submit to the environmental engineer an erosion and sediment
control plan for review by the environmental engineer. The
erosion and sediment control plan shall identify any
Chesapeake Bay preservation areas and shall contain all other
information required by the Virginia Erosion and Sediment
Control Law, the Virginia Erosion and Sediment Control
Regulations, and the Virginia Erosion and Sediment Control
Handbook.
(b) The environmental engineer shall either approve or
disapprove an erosion and sediment control plan within 45
days after it is submitted. All approvals and disapprovals
shall be in writing. When a plan is disapproved, the
03-1086
12/17/03
environmental engineer shall inform the applicant of the
reasons for the disapproval and shall describe modifications
to the plan that must be made in order for the plan to be
approved. The environmental engineer shall grant written
approval of the plan within 45 days of the plan's receipt if
he determines that the plan meets the conservation standards.
As a prerequisite to engaging in the land-disturbing
activities shown on the approved plan, the owner shall
certify that he will properly perform the conservation
measures included in the plan and will conform to the
provisions of this chapter and of Va. Code §10.1-560, et seq.
and shall provide the name of an individual holding a
certificate of competence, as provided by Va. Code §10-1-561,
who will be in charge of and responsible for carrying out the
land disturbing activity. Failure to provide the name of an
individual holding a certificate of competence prior to
engaging in land disturbing activities shall result in the
application of the penalties provided in this chapter.
(c) If the environmental engineer does not approve or
disapprove an erosion and sediment control plan within 45
days after an applicant submits such a plan, the erosion and
sediment control plan shall be approved. However, the
applicant shall fulfill all of the other requirements of
section 8-4 before the environmental engineer issues a land-
disturbance permit to the applicant.
(d) The environmental engineer shall require all
erosion and sediment control plans to comply with the
conservation standards and specifications contained in the
Virginia Erosion and Sediment Control Handbook before they
are approved. In cases where a conflict exists between the
Virginia Erosion and Sediment Control Regulations (4VAC50-30)
and the Virginia Erosion and Sediment Control Handbook, the
terms of the Regulations shall take precedence over the terms
of the Handbook.
(e) For construction sites that are adjacent to
sensitive environmental features such as RPAs, wetlands and
floodplains, the approved plan may incorporate additional
measures required by the environmental engineer to adequately
prevent sediment from entering those resources.
(f) It shall be unlawful for any person to violate the
provisions of an approved erosion and sediment control plan,
or any other erosion and sediment control measures deemed
necessary by the environmental engineer, as provided for in
Va. Code §10.1-560 et. seq. 4VAC50-30-40, and the most
recently approved edition of the Virginia Erosion and
Sediment Control Handbook.
Sec. 8-7. Modifications to an approved plan.
An approved plan may be changed by
authority when:
the plan-approving
(a)
An inspection reveals that the plan is inadequate
to control erosion and sedimentation and to satisfy
applicable laws and/or regulations; or
(b)
The responsible land disturber finds that because
of changed circumstances or other reasons the
approved plan cannot be effectively carried out,
03-1087
12/17/03
and proposed amendments to the plan, consistent
with the requirements of this ordinance, are agreed
to by the plan-approving authority.
Sec. 8-8. Responslbility for the erosion and sediment
control plan.
The owner shall be responsible for preparing, submitting
and implementing the erosion and sediment control plan. The
owner shall also be responsible for the following:
(a) Engaging the services of
disturber as, defined in this chapter;
a responsible land
(b) Maintaining all measures required by the erosion
and sediment control plan;
(c)
Removing erosion and sediment control measures
after the environmental engineer determines that
the land is stabilized;
(d)
Removing all sediment from sediment basins that are
to be converted to permanent best management
practice facilities as required by the
environmental engineer; and
(e)
Ail sediment basins constructed in conjunction with
single family subdivisions that drain to the Swift
Creek Reservoir must remain in place and fully
stabilized until such time as a joint permit from
the US Army Corps of Engineers and the Virginia
Department of Environmental Quality has been
received which allow construction of the regional
BMPs required by Article VI of Chapter 12 of this
Code.
(f)
The restoration or repair of properties and/or
waters that have been adversely affected by the
transport of sediment from the project site which
is deemed necessary by the environmental engineer,
in consultation with the Water Quality
Administrator, or his designee.
Sec. 8-9. Erosion and sediment control plans for land-
disturbing activity in more than one jurisdiction.
Persons who propose to engage in land-disturbing
activity on land which extends into the jurisdiction of
another locality and who have obtained approval of a
conservation plan from the Virginia Department of
Conservation and Recreation, Division of Soil and Water
Conservation shall notify the environmental engineer of the
plan's approval. That approval shall fulfill the requirements
of obtaining approval of an erosion and sediment control plan
under this chapter. The person shall provide to the
environmental engineer written documentation that such
conservation plan has been approved by the Department of
Conservation and Recreation. The person shall also obtain a
land-disturbance permit from the environmental engineer
before engaging in land-disturbing activity in the county.
Sec. 8-10. Revocation of permit.
03-1088
12/17/03
(a) If the permit holder fails to comply with the
erosion and sediment control plan or with the requirements of
the land-disturbance permit, the environmental engineer shall
give notice to the permit holder of the failure to comply and
shall require the permit holder to comply within a specified
period of time. The environmental engineer shall give notice
in the manner that is described in section 8-15. The
environmental engineer shall revoke the land-disturbance
permit if the permit holder has not complied within the
specified time period contained in the notice.
(b) When the environmental engineer revokes a land-
disturbance permit, no land-disturbing activity shall take
place on the site, except for activity that is required by
the environmental engineer and which is directly related to
compliance with the erosion and sediment control plan or the
land-disturbance permit, as set forth in the notice of
failure to comply.
Sec. 8-11. Certification required.
(a) The county's environmental engineer shall at all
times contain among his staff one certified program
administrator, at least one certified plan reviewer, and at
least one certified project inspector. Any person who
received a certificate of competence from the Virginia Soil
and Water Conservation Board for plan review, project
administration or program administration before the mandatory
certification provisions of Code of Virginia, § 10.1-
561.1{A), were adopted shall be deemed to be certified.
(b) Ail erosion and sediment control plans shall be
approved by a certified plan reviewer. All inspections of
land-disturbing activity shall be conducted by a certified
inspector.
Sec. 8-12. Performance bond, cash escrow, or irrevocable
letter of credit.
(a) Applicants shall post a performance bond in favor
of the county with an acceptable corporate surety, in an
amount approved by the enw[ronmental engineer as sufficient
to install the controls specified in the erosion and sediment
control plan. The bond shall be conditioned on the faithful
performance of the approved erosion and sediment control plan
and shall indemnify and save harmless the county from any
loss that results from the applicant's failure to comply with
the requirements of this chapter. The form of the bond shall
be approved by the county attorney.
(b) In lieu of a performance bond, the applicant may
submit to the environmental engineer a cash escrow or an
irrevocable letter of credit which is approved as to form by
the county attorney. The amount of the cash escrow or letter
of credit shall be approved by the environmental engineer in
the manner described in subsection (a).
(c) The amount of the bond, cash escrow, or irrevocable
letter of credit shall include an amount that is equal to ten
percent of the installation cost to cover maintenance costs.
(d) If the owner or ]permit holder does not faithfully
perform the approved erosion and sediment control plan or any
other measures deemed necessary by the environmental
03-1089
12/17/03
engineer, as provided for in Va. Code §10.1-560, et. seq.
4VAC50-30-40, and the most recently approved edition of the
Virginia Erosion and Sediment Control Handbook, the
environmental engineer shall revoke the land disturbance
permit prior to using any funds that are posted to implement
any portion of the erosion and sediment control plan or other
measures deemed necessary by the environmental engineer. The
person who posted the bond, letter of credit or cash escrow
shall increase the bond, letter of credit or cash escrow back
to the original amount approved by the environmental engineer
before the environmental engineer reissues the land
disturbance permit to the permit holder.
(e) Any person who engages in land-disturbing activity
on land that has received minor site plan approval pursuant
to chapter 19 of the Code of Chesterfield County shall be
exempt from the requirements of this section, except that he
must obtain a land disturbance permit.
(f) Within 60 days after all land-disturbing activity
has been completed and the environmental engineer has
determined that all land has been stabilized, any unexpended
or unobligated funds that were posted or deposited with the
environmental engineer pursuant to this section shall be
released or refunded. For the purposes of this section, land-
disturbing activity shall be considered to be complete when a
certificate of occupancy has been issued or, in the case of a
subdivision, when the board of supervisors has adopted a
resolution requesting the state to accept the subdivision
roads into the state highway system.
Sec. 8-13. Fees.
(a) The applicant shall pay a program administration
fee to the county at the time that he submits to the
environmental engineer an erosion and sediment control plan.
The amount of the fee shall be:
(i)
For an erosion and sediment control plan for
land which is 10,000 square feet or larger and
not located in a proposed subdivision:
$1,360.00, plus $50.00 for each acre of land
to be disturbed.
(ii) For an erosion and sediment control plan for
land which is 10,000 square feet or larger and
located in a proposed subdivision: $1,360.00,
plus $50.00 for each lot.
(iii)For an erosion and sediment control plan for
land which is less than 10,000 square feet and
is not to be used for a single-family
residence: $100.00.
(iv) For any building permit application or erosion
and sediment control plan that is to be used
for a single-family residence, separately
built or any amendment thereto that changes
the proposed building footprint from that of
the initial submission: $50.00.
(v)
For resubmission of all or part of an erosion
and sediment control plan for a subdivision or
03-1090
12/17/03
a residential development for which plan
approval has previously been granted, there
shall be a fee of $1,000.00 unless the
resubmittal was requested by or on behalf of
the County.
(b) No program administration fee shall be required for
an erosion and sediment control plan for land-disturbing
activity that takes place in conjunction with a land use for
which a minor site plan has been approved in accordance with
the zoning ordinance.
(c) If a land-disturbance permit is revoked, the
applicant shall pay an a~ninistrative fee in an amount equal
to one-half of the original program administration fee when
the applicant applies to have the land-disturbance permit
reissued.
(d) No business located within an enterprise zone
designated by the Commonwealth of Virginia shall be required
to pay any of the fees described in this section. This
exemption shall continue for the life of the enterprise zone.
Sec. 8-14. Approval required for certain existing
conditions.
{a) It shall be unlawful for any owner of land in an
erosion impact area to willfully permit erosion and
sedimentation of his land to cause reasonably avoidable
damage or harm to adjacent or downstream property, roads,
streams, lakes or ponds.
(b) When the environmental engineer determines that
erosion and sedimentation is occurring in an erosion impact
area, he shall give notice of the erosion and sedimentation
to the land owner in writing at the address for the owner
contained in the real estate assessor's records, and require
the owner to obtain a land-disturbance permit for the purpose
of engaging in land-disturbing activity to control the
erosion and sedimentation. If the owner fails or refuses to
obtain a land-disturbance permit within five days after the
notice is mailed, or if the owner fails or refuses to install
or maintain the erosion and sediment controls required by the
approved erosion and sediment control plan after the land-
disturbance permit is issued and within five days after the
environmental engineer has given him written notice of such
failure or refusal, the owner shall be in violation of this
chapter. The environmental engineer may extend the five-day
period if the owner demonstrates good cause for an extension.
(c) In order to prevent further erosion, the Department
of Environmental Engineering may designate any land within
the County as an erosion impact area.
Sec. 8-15. Noncompliance with this chapter.
(a) If the envirormlental engineer determines that the
permit holder has not complied with this chapter, the erosion
and sediment control plan or the land-disturbance permit, the
environmental engineer shall serve a notice to comply on the
permit holder by:
03-1091
12/17/03
(1)
Delivering the notice to
designated agent and the
disturber;
the owner, his
responsible land
(2)
Mailing the notice by registered or certified
mail, to the address which the owner specified
for receiving notices in the land-disturbance
permit application and the responsible land
disturber; or
(3)
Delivering the notice to the designated agent,
contractor who is supervising the land-
disturbing activity, at the site where the
land-disturbing activity is permitted, or the
responsible land disturber.
(b) The notice shall state the section of this chapter
that has been violated and shall describe the measures that
the permit holder must take to comply with this chapter. The
notice shall also specify the date by which the permit holder
shall comply with this chapter. Failure to comply within the
time specified in the notice shall constitute a violation of
this chapter and the permit holder shall be subject to land
disturbance permit revocation and the penalties provided in
this chapter.
(c) If the permittee has not complied with this chapter
within the time specified in the notice, then, in addition to
the other actions permitted by this chapter, the
environmental engineer may take measures to install ground
cover or other temporary erosion and sediment control devices
that are deemed necessary by the environmental engineer. The
environmental engineer shall document all costs of any
measures and shall notify the landowner, in writing, that the
cost shall be a charge against the bond, letter of credit or
cash escrow that is posted pursuant to this chapter.
(d) If the environmental engineer notifies the County
Administrator of a substantial violation of this chapter, the
County Administrator may, in conjunction with or subsequent
to a notice to comply as specified in this chapter, issue an
order in accordance with Va. Code §10.1-566(C) requiring that
all or part of the land-disturbing activities permitted on
the site be stopped until the specified corrective measures
have been undertaken. In issuing such stop work order, the
land disturbance permit shall be revoked and, where
applicable, all other county permits and inspections for that
project shall be suspended. The stop work order shall also
apply to sewer and water line construction. The order shall
be served in the same manner as a notice to comply, and shall
remain in effect for a period of seven days from the date of
service pending application by the county attorney or permit
holder for appropriate relief to the Circuit Court of
Chesterfield County.
(e) If land disturbing activities commenced prior to
the issuance of a land disturbance permit are causing, or are
in imminent danger of causing, harmful erosion of lands or
sediment deposition in waters within the watersheds of the
state, the environmental engineer may take measures
subsequent to a stop work order as provided in this chapter,
to install any groundcover or other temporary erosion and
sediment control devices deemed necessary. The environmental
03-1092
12/17/03
engineer shall document all costs of such measures and shall
notify the landowner in writing of such costs. The landowner
shall reimburse the County for such costs prior to the
issuance of a land disturbance permit.
(f) Where the identified non-compliance is causing or
is in imminent danger of causing harmful erosion of lands or
sediment deposition in waters within the watersheds of the
state, or where the land-disturbing activities have commenced
without an approved plan and/or land disturbance permit, a
stop work order may be issued without regard to whether the
permittee has been issued a notice to comply as specified in
this chapter. Otherwise, such an order may be issued only
after the permittee has failed to comply with the notice to
comply.
(g) Where the identified non-compliance has caused
significant erosion of lands and sediment deposition in
waters within watersheds of the County, or has adversely
affected downstream properties, the environmental engineer
shall hold the permit holder responsible for any restoration
measures deemed necessary.
(h) If land disturbing activities have commenced
without a land disturbance permit, the environmental engineer
shall issue a notice of permit requirement and a stop work
order for the immediate cessation all of land-disturbing
activities. The issuance of such a stop work order shall
also operate to suspend all other applicable county permits
and inspections. In addition, civil penalties may be imposed
in accordance with this chapter.
o o o
Sec. 8-17. Penalty for vlolatlon of chapter.
(a) A civil penalty in the amount listed on the
schedule below may be assessed against the owner of the
property, unless otherwise specified in this subsection, for
a violation of each of the following offenses:
(i) Commencement of land disturbing activity prior to
the issuance of a land disturbance permit as provided in
Section 8-2(a) shall be a fine of $1,000.
(ii) Vegetative Measures: failure to comply with Minimum
Standards 1,2,3 and 5 shall be a fine of $100.
(iii)Structural Measures: failure to comply with Minimum
Standards 4, 6, 10, 11, 15, and 17 shall be a fine
of $100.
(iv) Watercourse Measurers: failure to comply with
Minimum Standards 12, 13 and 15 shall be a fine of
$100.
(v)
Slope Stabilization/Protective Measures: failure to
comply with Minimum Standards 7, 8 and 9 shall be a
fine of $100o
(vi) Underground Utility Measures: failure to comply
with Minimum Standard 16(a), (b), (c), and/or (d)
shall be a fine of $100.
03-1093
12/17/03
(vii)Erosion Control Standards and Specifications:
failure to comply with any Standards and
Specifications contained in Chapter 3 of the
current edition of the Virginia Erosion and
Sediment Control Handbook shall be a fine of $100.
(viii)Dust Control: failure to comply with the Standard
and Specification 3.39 relating to dust control
shall be a fine of $100.
(ix) Failure of the person responsible for carrying out
the plan to provide the name of an individual
holding a certificate of competence, as provided by
Va. Code §10.1-563, who will be in charge of and
responsible for carrying out the land-disturbing
activity shall be a fine of $100.
(x)
Certified Responsible Land Disturber: failure of
the certified responsible land disturber to fulfill
any responsibilities provided for in this chapter
shall be a fine of $100.
(xi) Failure to obey a stop work order shall be a fine
of $100.
(xii)Failure to stop work when a permit is revoked shall
be a fine of $100.
(xiii)Each day during which the violation is found to
have existed shall constitute a separate offense.
However, in no event shall a series of specified
violations arising from the same operative set of
facts result in civil penalties which exceed a
total of $3,000, except that a series of violations
arising from the commencement of land-disturbing
activities without a Land Disturbance Permit for
any site shall not result in civil penalties which
exceed a total of $10,000. The assessment of civil
penalties according to this schedule shall not be
applied toward the cost of the installation of
conservation measures required on the approved
erosion and sediment control plan and/or any other
measures deemed necessary by the environmental
engineer and shall be in lieu of criminal sanctions
and shall preclude the prosecution of such
violation as a misdemeanor under subsection (a) of
this section.
(xiv)Any civil penalties assessed in accordance with
subsection (b) of this section shall be paid into
the treasury of the County and designated for the
purpose of minimizing, preventing, managing or
mitigating pollution of the waters of the County.
(b) The environmental engineer shall prepare an
Erosion and Sediment Control Civil Violation Summons for use
in enforcing the provisions of this chapter. Such Notice
shall contain the following information:
03-1094
12/17/03
(i) The name and address of the person charged.
(ii) The nature of the violation
Standards and Specifications
being met.
and Minimum
that are not
(iii)The location and dates that the violation
occurred or was observed.
(iv) The amount of the civil penalty established
for the violation.
(v)
The manner, location, and time that the civil
penalty may be paid to the County.
(vi) A statement that it is the right of the
recipient of the Notice to elect to stand
trial for the infraction and the date of such
trial.
(c) The environmental engineer or his designee, after
consulting with the environmental engineer, shall have the
option of serving upon the owner or permittee of the site
upon which the violation occurred the Civil Violation
Summons, without issuing the notice to comply provided for in
Section 8-15 of this chapter. However, the Notice of Civil
Violation shall be served without issuing the notice to
comply only in circumstances where the owner or his
designated agent has demonstrated an unwillingness to comply
with the environmental engineer's verbal instruction to
comply given to the owner or agent. The Notice of Civil
Violation shall be served in the same manner described in
Section 8-15 of this chapter.
(d) Should a Civil Violation Summons be issued as
provided in this chapter, it shall provide that any person
issued the Summons may, within five (5) working days of
receipt of the Summons, elect to pay the civil penalty by
making an appearance in person or by certified mail to the
Chesterfield County Treasurer's Office and, by such
appearance may enter a waiver of trial, admit liability, and
pay the civil penalty established for the violation charged
and provide that a signature to an admission of liability
shall have the same force and effect as a judqment in court;
however, an admission shall not be deemed a criminal
conviction for any purpose.
(e) If a person charged with a Civil Violation Summons
does not elect to enter a waiver of trial and admit
liability, the environmental engineer shall cause the
Sheriff's Department to serve the summons on the owner or
permittee.
(f) Failure to pay the civil penalty, or to contest the
violation, within the tilme period prescribed herein, shall
result in the immediate issuance of a stop work order and the
revocation of the permit.
(g) The environmental engineer may apply to the circuit
court of the county to enjoin a violation or a threatened
violation of this chapter, without the necessity of showing
that there is no adequate remedy at law.
03-1095
12/17/03
(h) Any person who violates any provision of this
chapter may be civilly liable to the county for damages
incurred by the county that result from the violation.
(i) If a person who has violated any condition of a
land-disturbance permit and the environmental engineer agree,
the environmental engineer may issue an order to the person
to pay a specific civil fine not to exceed $2,000.00 for a
violation. Such civil fine shall not be applied toward the
cost of the installation of conservation measures required on
the approved erosion and sediment control plan and/or any
other measures deemed necessary by the environmental
engineer. The fine shall be paid into the treasury of the
County and designated for the purpose of minimizing,
preventing, managing or mitigating pollution of the waters of
the County. If such a civil fine is imposed, no civil
penalty may be imposed pursuant to subsection (a).
(j) The county attorney shall take legal action to
enforce the provisions of this chapter when the environmental
engineer requests him to do so and when there is probable
cause to believe that a violation has occurred.
(k) Without limiting the remedies which may be obtained
in this section any person violating or failing, neglecting,
or refusing to obey any injunction, mandamus or other remedy
obtained pursuant to this section shall be subject, at the
discretion of the court, to a civil penalty not to exceed
$2,000 for each violation. A civil action for such violation
or failure may be brought by the County. Any civil penalties
assessed by a court shall be paid into the treasury of the
County and designated for the purpose of minimizing,
preventing, managing or mitigating pollution of the waters of
the County, except where the violator is the County itself,
or its agency, the court shall direct the penalty to be paid
in the state treasury of the state.
(2) That this
January 1, 2004.
ordinance shall
become
effective on
Ayes: Warren, McHale and Humphrey.
Nays: Barber and Miller.
Mr. Miller excused himself from the meeting.
17.B. TO CONSIDER A THIRD AMENDMENT TO THE FB0 SERVICES AND
LEASE AGREEMENT WITH DOMINION AVIATION SERVICES,
INCORPORATED
Mr. Pitaro stated this date and time has been advertised for
a public hearing for the Board to consider a third amendment
to the FBO Services and Lease Agreement with Dominion
Aviation Services, Incorporated.
Mr. Warren called for public comment.
No one came forward to speak to the issue.
On motion of Mrs. Humphrey, seconded by Mr. Warren, the Board
approved a third amendment to the FBO Services and Lease
Agreement with Dominion Aviation Services, Incorporated.
Ayes: Warren, McHale, Barber and Humphrey.
Nays: None.
Absent: Miller.
03-1096
12/17/03
17.C. TO CONSIDER THE CONVEYANCE OF LEASES OF REAL PROPERTY
AT VARIOUSi PARK SITES AND ATHLETIC COMPLEXES FOR
OPERATION OF FOOD CONCESSIONS BY CO-SPONSORED ATHLETIC
ASSOCIATIONS AND LEAGUES
Mr. Hammer stated this date and time has been advertised for
a public hearing for the Board to consider the conveyance of
leases of real property at various park sites and athletic
complexes for operation of food concessions by co-sponsored
athletic associations and leagues.
Mr. Warren called for public comment.
No one came forward to speak to the issue.
On motion of Mrs. Humphrey, seconded by Mr. McHale, the Board
approved the conveyance of leases of real property for
operation of food concessions at various park sites, as
outlined in the papers of this Board.
Ayes: Warren, McHale, Barber and Humphrey.
Nays: None.
Absent: Miller.
17.D. TO AMEND THE ZONING ORDINANCE RELATIVE TO INCREASING
FINES FOR VIOLATIONS GOVERNED BY CIVIL PENALTIES
Mr. William Poole stated this date and time has been
advertised for a public hearing for the Board to consider an
amendment to the Zoning Ordinance relative to an increase in
fines for violations governed by civil penalties.
Mr. Warren called for public comment.
No one came forward to speak to the ordinance amendment.
On motion of Mrs.i Humphrey, seconded by Mr. Warren, the Board
adopted the following ordinance:
AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE CODE OF THE COUNTY
OF CHESTERFIELD, 1997, AS AMENDED, BY AMENDING
AND RE-ENACTING SECTION 19-6 RELATING TO CIVIL PENALTIES
AND PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY
BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield
County:
(1) That SectiOn 19-6 of the Code of the County of
Chesterfield, 1997, as amended, is amended and re-enacted to
read as follows:
Sec. 19-6. Civilipenalties for certain violations.
(a) Any violation of the following provisions shall be
punishable by a civil penalty of not more than $100.00 for
the initial summons and not more than $250.00 for each
additional summons:
(1) Operation of a business that is not a home
occupation, on ia lot or parcel inside or outside of a
dwelling unit orl accessory building, in any R, R-TH, R-MF or
A district, withOut a special exception or conditional use.
(2) Violation of any condition of zoning and
development approvals and substantial accord
03-1097
12/17/03
approvals for which a public hearing does not occur
that relates to the hours of operation of the use
of land or that relates to reduction or control of
noise from the use of land.
(b) Each day during which any violation of subsection
(a) exists shall constitute a separate violation. However, in
no event shall any such violation arising from the same set
of operative facts be charged more frequently than once in
any ten-day period, nor shall a series of such violations
arising from the same set of operative facts result in civil
penalties which exceed a total of $5,000.00.
(c) The designation of a particular violation of this
section as an infraction pursuant to subsection (a) shall be
in lieu of criminal sanctions, and except for any violation
resulting in injury to any person or persons, such
designation shall preclude the prosecution of a violation as
a criminal misdemeanor.
(d) The director of planning shall cause one copy of a
summons to be personally served upon persons violating the
provisions of subsection (a).
(e) Such summons shall contain the following
information:
(1) The name and address of the person charged.
(2)
The nature of the infraction and the ordinance
provision(s) being violated.
(3) The location, date and time that the
infraction occurred or was observed.
(4)
The amount of the civil penalty assessed for
the infraction.
(5)
The manner, location and time in which the
civil penalty may be paid to the county.
(6)
The right of the recipient of the summons to
elect to stand trial for the infraction and
the date for such trial.
(f) The summons shall provide that any person summoned
for a violation may elect to pay the civil penalty by making
an appearance in person or in writing by mail to the county
treasurer at least 72 hours prior to the time and date fixed
for trial and, by such appearance, may enter a waiver of
trial, admit liability and pay the civil penalty established
for the offense charged. Such summons shall provide that a
signature to an admission of liability shall have the same
force and effect as a judgment of court. However, an
admission shall not be deemed a criminal conviction for any
purpose.
(g) If a person charged with a violation does not elect
to enter a waiver of trial and admit liability, the violation
shall be tried in the general district court in the same
manner and with the same right of appeal as provided by law
or equity and it shall be the county's burden to prove the
violator's liability by a preponderance of the evidence. A
03-1098
12/17/03
finding of liability shall not be deemed a criminal
conviction for any purpose.
(h) The remedies provided for in this section are
cumulative and not exclusive and shall be in addition to any
other remedies provided by law or equity.
(2) That this o~dinance shall become effective immediately
upon adoption.
Ayes: Warren, MCHale, Barber and Humphrey.
Nays: None.
Absent: Miller.
Mr. McHale stated he would like to see the General Assembly
grant the countyI the ability for its zoning inspectors to
issue summons, and requested that the Board consider adding
this issue to its legislative program.
Mr. Miller return!ed to the meeting.
17 .E.
TO CONSIDER THE TAX EXEMPTION REQUEST OF MEALS ON
WHEELS OF i~REATER RIC~OND, INCORPORATED
Mr. Micas stated this date and time has been advertised for a
public hearing for the Board to consider the tax exemption
request of Meals ion Wheels of Greater Richmond. He noted the
exemption would !be capped at $5,000 per year even if the
assessment increased.
Mr. Warren called for public comment.
No one came forward to speak to the issue.
On motion of Mr.i McHale, seconded by Mr. Barber, the Board
approve the taxl exemption request of Meals on Wheels of
Greater Richmond, Incorporated by adopting the following
ordinance:
AN ORDINANCE TO DESIGNATE THE REAL AND PERSONAL
PROPERTY OF MEALS ON WHEELS OF GREATER
iRICHMOND, INC. TO BE EXEMPT
FROM PROPERTY TAXATION
WHEREAS, subsection 6(A)(6) of Article X of the
Constitution of iVirginia, on and after January 1, 2003,
authorizes localities to designate as exempt from local
taxation the real or personal property, or both, owned by a
non-profit organization that uses such property for
religious, charitable, patriotic, historical, benevolent,
cultural, or public park and playground purposes; and
WHEREAS, the County has received a request from Meals on
Wheels of Greater Richmond, Inc. to consider granting it a
tax exemption for real and personal property owned by it in
Chesterfield County; and
WHEREAS, in accordance with Va. Code, §58.1-3651 the
Board has conducted a public hearing and considered each of
the questions required to be considered before adopting an
ordinance granting any such exemption; and
03-~099
12/17/03
WHEREAS, the Board has determined that Meals on Wheels
of Greater Richmond, Inc. meets the requirement for the real
and personal property tax exemption that it has requested by
reason of its being a non-profit organization which uses the
real and personal property for which it is requesting the
exemption for benevolent purposes.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors
of Chesterfield County:
1. Meals on Wheels of Greater Richmond, Inc. is hereby
designated a benevolent and public park and playground
organization within the context of Section 6(A) (6) of Article
X of the Constitution of Virginia.
2. Real and personal property located in Chesterfield
County owned by Meals on Wheels of Greater Richmond, Inc. and
used by such organization exclusively for benevolent purposes
on a non-profit basis as set forth in Section 1 of this
ordinance is hereby determined to be exempt from local
taxation. This exemption shall be contingent on the
continued use of the property in accordance with the purpose
for which the organization is designated as exempt in Section
1.
3. This real and personal property tax exemption shall
be effective as of January 1, 2004.
4. This ordinance shall not be set out in the County
Code but shall be kept on file in the offices of the real
estate assessor and commissioner of revenue.
5. This ordinance shall be in effect immediately upon
its adoption.
Ayes: Warren, McHale, Barber, Humphrey and Miller.
Nays: None.
17.F. TO CONSIDER APPROVING A RESOLUTION REQUESTING THE
ESTABLISHMENT OF A ~NO-WAKE" ZONE FOR A PORTION OF T~
APPOMATTOX RIVER
Mr. Hammer stated a group of property owners located near
Walthall channel on the Appomattox River has requested a ~No-
Wake" zone on a portion of the Appomattox River. He further
stated this date and time has been advertised for a public
hearing to consider establishing a "No-Wake" zone for a
portion of the Appomattox River. He stated staff recommends
approval.
Mr. Warren called for public comment.
Mr. Richard McLaughlin expressed concerns relative to safety
and property damage issues. He stated most boaters seem to
be unaware of the law that requires boats to be at idle speed
at any time it is within 50 feet of a dock or another boat,
indicating that a ~No-Wake" sign would be a reminder for
boaters to slow to this speed. He also expressed concerns
relative to erosion of the riverbank, stating that wave
action of boats has caused catastrophic damage to private
property.
03-1100
12/17/03
Mr. Miller inquired whether signage could be placed in the
area to remind boaters to slow down without creating a "No-
Wake" zone.
Mr. Micas stated! the Board could request the Department of
Game and Inland Fisheries to post a sign, but he does not
know if they would do so.
Mr. McLaughlin Stated the Department of Game and Inland
Fisheries has indicated a "No-Wake" zone must be established
in order to enforce the speeding of boaters.
Mr. McHate statedi boaters would have an option to run at full
speed through the main channel and could avoid the proposed
"No-Wake" zone.
When asked, Mr. iMcLaughlin stated the Walthall channel is
approximately 50-75 feet wide, depending upon the tide level.
Mr. Barney McLaughlin stated he supports the ~No-Wake" zone
because of safetyl, property damage and erosion issues, and he
feels it will remind boaters to slow down.
Ms. Diana Parker,i representing the Sierra Club, stated boats
that make large wakes affect nesting birds on the lake. She
further stated she has seen the damage to Point of Rocks Park
as a result of wave action, and indicated she supports the
~No-Wake" zone.
Mr. Robert BoliCk stated he feels the UNo-Wake" zone is
necessary because of growth in both boating and development
of waterfront prQperty. He expressed concerns relative to
property damage, isafety and erosion, and requested that the
Board support the establishment of the "No-Wake" zone.
Mr. Ron Castlebury, a property owner on the Walthall channel,
stated he does nOt support a "No-Wake" zone because residents
enjoy recreational boating in the residential area of the
channel.
Mr. Wayne Walton stated he does not support the ~No-Wake"
zone, indicating ihe feels the three marina sites on the river
would be commercially impacted by the approval of additional
~No-Wake" zones. ~ He expressed concerns relating to setting a
precedent by approving the proposed ~No-Wake" zone, and then
having to approve additional ones if requested by
constituents to do so.
Mr. Bill Cato, oWner of Appomattox Small Boat Harbor, stated
he does not havei an ongoing problem with excessive wake and
presented a petiltion with 100 signatures opposing the "No-
Wake" zone.
Mr. John Barkley!stated he opposes the "No-Wake" zone.
Mr. John Snead stated he opposes the "No-Wake" zone and has
experienced very little erosion on his riverfront property
due to wakes.
Mr. Gary Lowe stated he supports the "No-Wake" zone.
Mr. Tommy Crump stated there are no "No-Wake" zones in the
Chickahominy River where there are probably 100 times more
03-1101
12/17/03
boats and recreational water vehicles than the Appomattox
River. He further stated he opposes the proposed UNo-Wake"
zone.
Mr. Felix Vozar expressed concerns relative to safety and
environmental issues and stated he supports the "No-Wake"
zone.
Mr. Bob Schrum stated he opposes the UNo-Wake" zone and feels
that people who purchase riverfront property understand there
will be boats and activity on the river and should build
their docks accordingly. He further stated he feels placing
UNo-Wake" zones on the river will set a bad precedent.
Mr. Anthony Zevgolis stated Chesterfield County has huge
areas of marsh and wetlands and is a habitat for wildlife,
and expressed concerns relative to erosion and noise
pollution. He further stated he feels the entire Appomattox
River should be a UNo-Wake" zone, indicating that the rights
of landowners have always prevailed in court over those of
boaters. He stated one boat produces 40 waves at high tide,
and he feels the Board should address the issues of public
safety and property damage by approving the establishment of
a "No-Wake" zone.
When asked, Mr. Zevgolis stated it is a law that boaters are
not to create a wake within 50 feet of any dock, any other
boat that is moored, or people in the water. He expressed
concerns relative to injuries and destruction that can be
caused when boaters do not adhere to this law.
Mr. Miller expressed concerns relative to the necessity of
creating a "No-Wake" zone if this law is already in effect.
Mr. Micas stated it is very difficult to enforce the 50-foot
law, and posting of a UNo-Wake" sign makes the law
enforceable.
Mr. Miller stated he feels the issue is one of courtesy.
Mr. Zevgolis stated the Board could consider placing a speed
limit in the Walthall channel rather than adopting a "No-
Wake" zone. He further stated he feels the localities should
place police boats on the river and arrest boaters that come
through at excessive speeds.
Mr. Barber excused himself from the meeting.
Ms. Andrea Stables stated she opposes the UNo-Wake" zone for
this area because it is considered a pleasure channel.
There being no one else to speak to the issue, the public
hearing was closed.
Mr. McHale expressed concerns relative to the narrow width of
the Walthall channel and stated he feels the public safety
issue is very important.
Mr. McHale then made a motion, seconded by Mr. Warren, for
the Board to adopt a resolution requesting the establishment
of a UNo-Wake- zone on a portion of the Appomattox River.
03-1102
12/17/03
Mr. Miller stated he feels there may be other options to
address the issues short of establishing a ~No-Wake" zone,
indicating he will not support the motion.
Mr. Warren called for a vote on the motion of Mr. McHale,
seconded by Mr. Warren, for the Board to adopt the following
resolution requesting the establishment of a ~No-Wake" zone
on a portion of the Appomattox River:
RESOLUTION REQUESTING THE ESTABLISHMENT
OF Al (~NO-WAKE") MARKER ON A PORTION
OF THE APPOMATTOX RIVER, A CHESTERFEILD COUNTY
PUBLIC WATERWAY
WHEREAS, Section 29.1-744 of the Code of Virginia, 1950,
as amended, allows persons to request the establishment of
"No-Wake" zones on public waterways by submitting an
application to the county for placement of ~No-Wake" markers;
and
WHEREAS, state law further requires that the County
forward the application to the State Department of Game and
Inland Fisheries ifor final approval; and
WHEREAS, landowners have submitted an application for a
~No-Wake" marker downstream from R. Garland Dodd Park at
Point of Rocks, a public waterway located in Chesterfield
County; and
WHEREAS, the application explains that the ~No-Wake"
markers are needed for safety and ecological reasons, as well
as to prevent the destruction of personal property; and
WHEREAS, the county adopted an ordinance allowing for
the establishment of ~No-Wake" zones on July 28, 1999; and
WHEREAS, a Public hearing was duly noticed and held on
December 17, 2003, to receive public comment on the
application.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of
Supervisors of Chesterfield County that the application for a
regulatory marker (~No-Wake") on a portion of the Appomattox
River as described fully in the attached application shall be
forwarded with the approval of this Board to the Director of
the State Department of Game and Inland Fisheries for final
approval.
Ayes: Warren, McHale and Humphrey.
Nays: Miller.
Absent: Barber.
Mr. Barber returned to the meeting.
17.G. TO CONSIDER A PROPOSED CHARTER AMENDMENT REGARDIN~
SUSPENSION FOR THE ELDERLY OF PAYMENT OF ASSESSMENTS
DUE FOR SEWER ANDWATER ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS
Mr. Micas stated this date and time has been advertised for a
public hearing for the Board to consider a proposed charter
amendment relative to suspension for the elderly of payment
of assessments due for sewer and water assessment districts.
03-1103
12/17/03
Mr. Warren called for public comment.
Ms. Diana Parker, representing the Sierra Club, stated she
feels the proposed charter amendment is an example of ~smart
growth" for updating older developments.
There being no one else to speak to the issue, the public
hearing was closed.
On motion of Mr. Barber, seconded by Mr. McHale, the Board
approved the following charter amendment:
Amend county charter to defer payments within residential
water or sewer assessment districts for owners 65 years of
age and older until the property is no longer occupied by a
property owner who is 65 years of age or older:
Chapter 3. Board of Supervisors
3.5 Powers.
o o o
o o o
K. To create or modify assessment districts for local
improvements in accordance with Title 15.2, Chapter 24,
Article 2 of the Code of Virginia. For any such assessment
district created after January 1, 2003, the Board may provide
for the payment of an assessment of costs for improvements,
or of any installment due pursuant to Virginia Code Section
15.2-2413, to be suspended when any owner who owned property
on the day the ordinance creating the assessment district was
adopted and who occupies a residential building located on
the property is 65 years of age or older. However, when the
property is no longer occupied by a person who is 65 years of
age or older or is conveyed to another person or persons,
irrespective of the age of the person or persons to whom the
property is conveyed, the suspension of payments shall cease
and the entire assessment, including accrued interest, shall
be immediately due and payable.
Ayes: Warren, McHale, Barber, Humphrey and Miller.
Nays: None.
(It is noted the General Assembly must approve the charter
amendment before it becomes a part of the county charter.)
17.H. TO CONSIDER AN ORDINANCE TO VACATE A PORTION OF A
SIXTEEN-FOOT DRAINAGE EASEMENT ACROSS LOT 36, SAINT
JAMES WOODS, SECTION K
Mr. Stith stated this date and time has been advertised for a
public hearing for the Board to consider an ordinance to
vacate a portion of a 16-foot drainage easement across Lot
36, Saint James Woods, Section K.
Mr. Warren called for public comment.
No one came forward to speak to the ordinance.
03-1104
12/17/03
On motion of Mrs. Humphrey, seconded by Mr. Warren, the Board
adopted the following ordinance:
AN ORDINANCE whereby the COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD,
VIRGINIA, ("GRANTOR") vacates to VALENTINA
KAMINSKI, ("GRANTEE"), a portion of a 16' drainage
easement across Lot 36, St. James Woods, Section K,
MATOACA Magisterial District, Chesterfield County,
Virginia, as shown on a plat thereof duly recorded
in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of
Chesterfield County in Plat Book 129, at Page 4.
WHEREAS, VALENTINA KAMINSKI, petitioned the Board of
Supervisors of Chesterfield County, Virginia to vacate a
portion of a 16' drainage easement across Lot 36, St. James
Woods, Section K, MATOACA Magisterial District, Chesterfield
County, Virginia more particularly shown on a plat of record
in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of said County in
Plat Book 129, Page 4, by JOSEPH, COX & ASSOCIATES, INC.,
dated AUGUST 19, 2002. The portion of easement petitioned to
be vacated is more fully described as follows:
A portion of a 16' drainage easement, across Lot
36, St. James Woods, Section K, the location of
which is more fully shown on a plat made by BALZER
& ASSOCIATES, INC., dated OCTOBER 21, 2003, a copy
of which is attached hereto and made a part of this
Ordinance.
WHEREAS, notice has been given pursuant to Section 15.2-
2204 of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended, by
advertising; and
WHEREAS, no public necessity exists for the continuance
of the portion of easement sought to be vacated.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE
SUPERVISORS OF CHESTERFIELD COUNTY, VIRGINIA:
BOARD OF
That pursuant to Section 15.2-2272 of the Code of
Virginia, 1950, as amended, the aforesaid portion of easement
be and is hereby vacated.
This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect in
accordance with Section 15.2-2272 of the Code of Virginia,
1950, as amended, and a certified copy of this Ordinance,
together with the plat attached hereto shall be recorded no
sooner than thirty days hereafter in the Clerk's Office of
the Circuit Court of Chesterfield County, Virginia pursuant
to Section 15.2-2276 of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as
amended.
The effect of this Ordinance pursuant to Section 15.2-
2274 is to destroy the force and effect of the recording of
the portion of the plat vacated. This Ordinance shall vest
fee simple title of the portion of easement hereby vacated in
the property owner of Lot 36, within St. James Woods, Section
K free and clear of any rights of public use.
Accordingly, this Ordinance shall be indexed in the
names of the COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD as GRANTOR, and VALENTINA
KAMINSKI, or her successors in title, as GRANTEE.
Ayes: Warren, McHale, Barber, Humphrey and Miller.
Nays: None.
03-1105
12/17/03
Mr. Warren requested a five-minute recess.
Reconvening:
18. REI~ININ~ ~OBILE HO14E PERI, ITS AND ZONIN~ REQUES?~
02SN0209
In Matoaca Magisterial District, SOUTHERN LAND COMPANY LLC
requests rezoning and amendment of zoning district map from
Agricultural (A) to Residential (R-12) with Conditional Use
Planned Development to permit exceptions to Ordinance
requirements. A mixed use development with residential,
office and commercial uses is planned. Residential use of up
to 3.63 units per acre is permitted in a Residential (R-12)
District. The density of such amendment will be controlled
by zoning conditions or Ordinance standards. The
Comprehensive Plan suggests the property is appropriate for
single family residential use of 2.0 units per acre or less.
This request lies on 1,196.2 acres fronting in three (3)
places for a total of approximately 2,800 feet on the north
line of Beach Road, lying across from Coalboro Road and at
the southern terminus of Otterdale Road. Tax ID 714-663-0471
(Sheets 15 and 23).
Mr. Jacobson presented a summary of Case 02SN0209 and stated
the Planning Commission and staff recommend approval and
acceptance of the proffered conditions. He noted the request
conforms to the Upper Swift Creek Plan and addresses the
impact on capital facilities consistent with the Board's cash
proffer policy. He stated the applicant has submitted an
amendment to Proffered Condition 14 to provide additional
landscaping materials adjacent to Ashbrook Subdivision, and
also a new Proffered Condition 17 which addresses additional
water quality provisions consistent with some of the
proffered conditions the Board has received over the last
couple of months with development within the Upper Swift
Creek area.
Mr. John Cogbill commended Mr. McHale on his service as
Bermuda District Supervisor.
Mr. Cogbill, representing the applicant, stated the revised
proffered conditions address recent water quality issues that
have been raised by both the Board and the Planning
Commission. He further stated the proposal addresses the
impact on capital facilities; addresses all on-site and even
some off-site transportation issues at a cost of an
additional $8 million; provides for resources to address the
need for adequate public facilities; provides a 30-foot water
transmission line easement; will bring potable water closer
to citizens on Beach Road; places the burden of construction
for Otterdale Road Extended on the applicant or its
successors; addresses environmental concerns; adds a
requirement to make silt basins into BMPs; and will not have
a significant impact on school enrollment or traffic until
2008 or 2009. He stated growth in the county is still under
control, and it is the only way to pay for infrastructure.
He further stated the project will probably not draw its
first building permit until the end of 2005 or 2006. He
stated the applicant is looking at the possibility of
03-1106
12/17/03
locating an elementary school site on the subject property.
He noted the request is consistent with the Upper Swift Creek
Plan and embraces planned managed growth by developing from
the edge of existing infrastructure and providing for
sequential development to adjacent lands. He stated the
applicant addresses transportation impacts on-site as well as
off-site by building an internal circulation system and
linking the communities through an east-west connector. He
further stated the applicant will continue dialogues with
area residents relative to traffic and other concerns and
requested that the Board approve the proposal as recommended
by the Planning Commission with the amendment to Proffered
Condition 14 and the addition of Proffered Condition 17.
Mr. Warren called for public co~mment.
Ms. Diana Parker, representing the Sierra Club, stated that,
although the applicant has addressed environmental issues and
has proposed a quality development, she does not believe the
area is ready for a development of this magnitude and,
therefore, does not support the request.
Mr. Scott Numeister, a resident of Hampton Park, stated he
opposes poorly managed growth and is concerned that many
Chesterfield County residents are moving to Powhatan. He
requested that the Board use all available tools to address
infrastructure shortfalls before approving any new
development. He expressed concerns that a new elementary
school is not already in the advanced planning stages and
suggested that a comprehensive traffic flow study be
completed of the Hull Street area.
Mr. Shawn Holt, President of the Hampton Park Homeowners
Association, stated he has negotiated with the applicant in
an effort to minimize the effect of the proposed development
on the residents of Hampton Park. He further stated the
proffered conditions address the concerns raised by Hampton
Park residents relative to size and style of homes and an
additional access in the Ashbrook area. He stated the
residents have been assured of a continued dialogue with the
developer, and the Hampton Park Homeowners Board does not
oppose the request.
Mr. Hugh Strickland requested that the Board ensure that
infrastructure is available to support all of the growth that
is planned.
Mr. Bill Hastings stated the residents of the Route 360
corridor have expressed concerns relative to traffic and
school overcrowding. He requested that the Board consider a
90-day deferral and request funding from the county's
legislative delegation for improvements to Hull Street Road
from the Swift Creek Bridge to Hampton Park.
Mr. Peter Stone, a resident of Hampton Park, stated he does
not support the request because the infrastructure is not
available to support the proposed development.
Mr. Mike Wilson stated he feels the Board has the authority
to exercise discretion when determining whether zoning
requests would promote the health, safety and welfare of its
citizens. He further stated the proposed request would have
a devastating impact the 360 Corridor, which is already
03-1107
12/17/03
heavily overburdened. He expressed concerns relative to
increased automobile accidents and delayed fire and rescue
response times, and stated that denying or postponing the
request would benefit all of the constituents involved.
Mr. David O. Webb, a FoxFire resident, expressed concerns
relative to the negative financial impact rapid residential
growth is having on the county. He stated the current cash
proffer system does not cover the cost of the necessary
infrastructure. He provided details of county data regarding
residential lots in the Upper Swift Creek area, indicating
that the citizens are incurring a burden of approximately
$5,300 per lot. He requested that, before approving the
rezoning of any additional residential lots, the Board defer
all rezoning requests for one year until the updated Upper
Swift Creek Plan has been approved; study the option of
staged growth for large developments; request that staff
estimate the current full recovery of infrastructure costs
adjusted annually for inflation; and adopt an ordinance
requiring that once a rezoning request for a large
residential development has been approved, substantial
construction must begin within five years or the applicant
must return to the Board with a new request.
Ms. Marlene Durfee expressed concerns relative to growth
statistics in the Matoaca District as compared with the other
districts. She stated uncontrolled growth puts a hardship on
all facilities and services. She further stated she feels
Woolridge and Otterdale Roads should immediately be placed on
the priority list for improvements. She expressed concerns
relative to increased traffic accidents on roads in the Upper
Swift Creek area. She stated, although the Comprehensive
Plan is expected to be followed for zoning and planning
decisions, it cannot be made permanent or inflexible because
economic and social conditions may change and outdate the
plan. She requested that the Board expand upon what was done
at the Growth Summit and make a sound decision based on all
the information presented. She thanked Mr. Warren for his
foresight in addressing managed growth.
Ms. Kathy Kirk, a resident of FoxFire, referenced a recent
opinion of the Attorney General relative to zoning requests
and adequate public facilities. She further referenced case
law relative to protection against undue density of
population in relation to public facilities. She stated the
Supreme Court of Virginia has acknowledged, and state law
requires, that provisions of a Comprehensive Plan control the
general development of land within a locality, but it does
not by itself act as an instrument of land use control. She
further stated the Supreme Court of Virginia has recognized
that a locality may base its denial of a rezoning request in
part on inconsistencies between the proposed development and
the comprehensive plan. She stated the county's
Comprehensive Plan is a guideline and not an ordinance, and
requested that the Board make a decision that reflects the
current condition and applicability of the Upper Swift Creek
Plan. She expressed concerns that the proposed rezoning
constitutes a threat to the public's health and safety and
requested that the Board deny the request.
Mr. James Adams, representing the Birkdale Community
Association, stated he opposes the request. He suggested
that the Board identify its available authorities and powers
03-1108
12/17/03
relative to rezoning requests and consider implementing a
moratorium on development. He expressed concerns relative to
funding of the infrastructure necessary to support new
residential development and to inadequacy of the current
Upper Swift Creek Plan.
Mr. David Robinson stated he feels the Board should find a
way to deny rezoning requests for whatever reason that can be
found within the interpretation of the county's Comprehensive
Plan. He further stated the Board cannot stop growth and
development, but it can be managed. He expressed concerns
relative to the impact of the proposed development upon the
Swift Creek Reservoir and stated he hopes the Board feels
protection of the reservoir is within the county's
Comprehensive Plan. He requested that the Board find a way
to have the courage to deny the request.
Mr. Warren stated the number one issue raised in the last
Citizens' Satisfaction Survey was lack of adequate growth
management.
Ms. Tracey Williamson expressed appreciation to Mr. McHale
for his 12 years of service on the Board of Supervisors. She
stated the proposal provides for a well-planned community;
exceeds the guidelines set forth by the Upper Swift Creek
Plan; provides cash proffers that are above and beyond those
requested; and implements standards and practices that exceed
the erosion and sediment standards adopted this evening. She
further stated she feels the future extension of the Powhite
Parkway, the widening of Hull Street and completion of the
new high school will address traffic and school concerns that
have been raised and encouraged the Board to approve the
request.
Dr. Betty Hunter-Clapp expressed concerns relative to water
quantity and quality issues if the proposed development is
approved, and urged the Board to deny the request. She
requested that the Board revise the Upper Swift Creek Plan
before approving any additional residential development in
the area. She also requested that the Board devise a process
for citizens to share their concerns with Board members
relative to rezoning requests in a more orderly way.
Mr. Harley Joseph, a Midlothian District resident, stated he
supports the proposal and feels it will be an excellent
development.
Mr. Randy Overby, President of the Ashbrook Community
Association, expressed appreciation to Mrs. Humphrey for
meeting with residents concerning the proposed development.
He stated that, although it may not be the most perfect
timing, the proposed development is well thought out.
There being no one else to speak to the request, the public
hearing was closed.
Mr. Cogbill stated he does not feel the Board can impose a
moratorium on development. He further stated the applicant
has proposed a road connection to Ashbrook and Hampton Park
that will provide much quicker access to emergency services.
He further stated staff has indicated the proffered
conditions adequately mitigate the impact of the proposed
development on capital facilities, thereby insuring adequate
03-1109
12/17/03
service levels are maintained and protecting the health,
safety and welfare of county citizens. He reviewed road
improvements in the area over the past ten years and stated
construction of additional westbound lanes on Route 360 is
underway and additional eastbound lanes are proposed for
FY08-09. He provided photographs of silt barriers, "gutter
buddies," and other tools that will be provided by the
developer to address erosion and sediment control issues and
provided data confirming that the county will have plenty of
potable water for new and existing development. He stated
the proposed development represents planned managed growth
and requested the Board's approval.
Mrs. Humphrey stated she has met with Planning staff
regarding her objectives in revising the Upper Swift Creek
Plan, including additional green space; a collaborative
growth plan and funding opportunity; and reduced density.
She further stated community associations will be involved
with crafting the language of the revised plan. She
expressed appreciation to the developer for not connecting to
the Dry Creek neighborhood.
Mrs. Humphrey then made a motion, seconded by Mr. McHale, for
the Board to suspend its rules to allow for the additional
proffered conditions.
Ayes: Warren, McHale, Barber, Humphrey and Miller.
Nays: None.
Mrs. Humphrey then made a motion, seconded by Mr. McHale, for
the Board to approve Case 02SN0209 and accept the proffered
conditions.
Mr. Barber expressed frustration that the General Assembly
has not enacted adequate public facilities legislation,
indicating that the Board has no authority to deny rezoning
requests if an applicant complies with the tenets of the
Comprehensive Plan and voluntarily offers the maximum cash
proffer.
Mr. McHale stated the Attorney General has indicated the
Board cannot deny a case based upon inadequate public
facilities. He further stated he feels the county is growing
a little too fast, but the Board has a duty to make prudent
decisions consistent with the law.
Mr. Miller stated the Attorney General's opinion indicates
the Board cannot deny rezoning requests solely on the basis
of health, safety and welfare issues. He further stated the
applicant has done everything possible to comply with the
Upper Swift Creek Plan, and he will support the proposed
development.
Mr. Warren stated he feels the applicant has made a great
deal of effort to address the issues expressed by the
community. He further stated citizens are tremendously
frustrated with traffic issues on Route 360, and he does not
feel the Board is adequately addressing growth management in
the county. He stated that, although the General Assembly
has not adequately provided tools for local governments to
manage growth, there are means for managing growth,
indicating that other localities are denying large zoning
cases. He expressed concerns that the Board is not listening
03-1110
12/17/03
to the concerns of the citizens and reminded the Board that
he proposed a moratorium on residential growth a couple of
years ago. He stated that, until the county comes together
with the development community and finds ways to protect the
citizens' quality of life, the Board will continue to have
public hearings with frustrated citizens. He expressed
concerns relative to gridlock of the transportation system,
overcrowded schools, unsafe roads, inadequate Comprehensive
Plan, inadequate cash proffers, and potential health, safety
and welfare issues. He stated he would prefer the case be
deferred.
Mr. Warren then called for a vote on the motion of Mrs.
Humphrey, seconded by Mr. McHale, for the Board to approve
Case 02SN0209 and accept the following proffered conditions:
The Owners and the Developer (the "Developer") in this zoning
case, pursuant to §15.2-2298 of the Code of Virginia (1950 as
amended) and the Zoning Ordinance of Chesterfield County, for
themselves and their successors or assigns, proffer that the
development of the property known as Chesterfield County Tax
Identification Number 714-663-0471 (the "Property") under
consideration will be developed according to the following
conditions if, and only if, the rezoning request for R-12
with a conditional use planned development ("CUPD") is
granted. In the event the request is denied or approved with
conditions not agreed to by the Developer, the proffers and
conditions shall immediately be null and void and of no
further force or effect. If the zoning is granted, these
proffers and conditions will supersede all proffers and
conditions now existing on the Property.
The application contains one exhibit described as follows:
Exhibit A - Plan titled "Preliminary Zoning Map," prepared by
Jordan Consulting Engineers, P.C. and dated June 20, 2001,
last revised September 10, 2002, (the "Plan") is made a part
of this application as Exhibit A, which shall be considered
as a general illustration of the proposed development and
does not reflect a blueprint for future action for the
Property, except as explicitly outlined in the Textual
Statement and the proffered conditions. The Tracts shown on
the Exhibit may be further divided into Sub-Tracts (a
designated portion of the Tract) at the time of site plan or
tentative subdivision review, subject to the provisions
outlined in the Textual Statement and proffered conditions.
1. Utilities.
A conceptual overall water and wastewater systems
plan for this property, accompanied by a utilities
infrastructure phasing plan (the ~Utility Plans "),
shall be submitted to the Department of Utilities
at least thirty (30) days prior to the submission
of the first tentative subdivision, site, or
construction plan for the Property. Should the
Department of Utilities find that later variations
in line sizing and/or location of the lines are
deemed ~significant" changes then the Utility Plans
shall be revised and submitted for re-approval
prior to approval of any additional tentative
subdivision, site, or construction plans for the
Property.
03-1111
12/17/03
b. Public water and wastewater systems shall be used.
C ·
The Developer shall dedicate to the County a water
line easement along the east side of the Otterdale
Road Extension (the North/South Arterial) right-of-
way to facilitate future construction of a planned
water transmission interconnection. The width of
this easement shall be determined by the Utilities
Department prior to, or at the time of submittal
of, the first construction plan for Otterdale Road
Extension or the first tentative subdivision that
incorporates any portion of the Otterdale Road
Extension for County review.
The Developer shall incorporate into the on-site
water distribution system for the development a
water line along the east/west collector road. The
Developer shall construct this line to the
easternmost and westernmost boundaries of this
development. Subject to applicable County
policies, this water line shall be over-sized if
requested by the Utilities Department.
Prior to the issuance of the first building permit
for each tentative subdivision plat (~Plat") or
prior to a building permit for each site plan
(~Plan") approved for the Property, the Developer
shall make payments to Chesterfield County in the
amount of $200.00 per acre (not to exceed an
aggregate payment of $239,400 based upon the total
acreage in the Property) for that particular Plat
or Plan as a contribution towards the expansion of
the Dry Creek Wastewater Pump Station. (U)
Timbering. With the exception of timbering which has
been approved by the Virginia State Department of
Forestry for the purpose of removing dead or diseased
trees, there shall be no timbering on the Property until
a land disturbance permit has been obtained from the
Environmental Engineering Department and the approved
devices have been installed. (EE)
Density. The maximum number of dwelling units permitted
on the Property shall be 2392, except that for each acre
of commercial and/or office uses developed on the
Property the total number of dwelling units shall be
reduced at a rate of two (2) dwelling units/acre.
Commercial or office development shall not include
Cluster Residential, Cluster Condo, Townhouse, or Multi-
Family residential units, or the Recreational Areas (all
as defined in the Textual Statement). (P)
Age Restriction.
Except as otherwise prohibited by the Virginia Fair
Housing Law, the Federal Housing Law, and such
other applicable federal, state, or local legal
requirements, dwelling units may be restricted to
~housing for older persons " as defined in the
Virginia Fair Housing Law and shall have no persons
under 19 years of age domiciled therein (~Age-
Restricted Dwelling Units ").
03-1112
12/17/03
Lots, Tracts, or Sub-Tracts for Age-Restricted
Dwelling Units shall be grouped together on a
particular portion of the Property and shall not be
scattered among other residential dwelling units.
At the time of recordation of a subdivision plat
the lots shall be noted as age-restricted. Any
site plan for Age-Restricted Dwellings Units shall
also note the restriction. (B & M & P)
Cash Proffer.
so
For each dwelling unit developed, except Age
Restricted Dwelling Units, the applicant,
subdivider, or assignee(s) shall pay $7,800.00 per
unit to the County of Chesterfield, prior to the
time of issuance of a building permit, for
infrastructure improvements within the service
district for the Property if paid prior to July 1,
2002. Thereafter, such payment shall be the amount
approved by the Board of Supervisors not to exceed
$7,800.00 per unit as adjusted upward by any
increase in the Marshall and Swift Building Cost
Index between July 1, 2001 and July 1 of the fiscal
year in which the payment is made if paid after
June 30, 2002. If any of the cash proffers are not
expended for the purposes designated by the Capital
Improvement Program within fifteen (15) years from
the date of payment, they shall be returned in full
to the payor. Should Chesterfield County impose
impact fees at any time during the life of the
development that are applicable to the Property,
the amount paid in cash proffers shall be in lieu
of or credited toward, but not in addition to, any
impact fees in a imanner as determined by the
County.
bo
For each Age-Restricted Dwelling Unit developed,
the applicant, subdivider, or assignee(s) shall pay
$4,235.00 per unit to the County of Chesterfield,
prior to the time of issuance of a building permit,
for infrastructure improvements within the service
district for the Property if paid prior to July 1,
2002. The $4,235.00 for any units developed shall
be allocated pro-rata among the facility costs as
calculated annually by the County Budget Department
as follows: $805 for parks, $280 for library
facilities, $312 for fire stations, and $2,838 for
roads. Thereafter, such payment shall be the
amount approved by tlhe Board of Supervisors not to
exceed $4,235.00 per unit as adjusted upward by any
increase in the Marshall and Swift Building Cost
Index between July 1, 2001 and July 1 of the fiscal
year in which the payment is made if paid after
June 30, 2002. If any of the cash proffers are not
expended for the purposes designated by the Capital
Improvement Program within fifteen (15) years from
the date of payment, they shall be returned in full
to the payor. Should Chesterfield County impose
impact fees at any time during the life of the
development that are applicable to the Property,
the amount paid in cash proffers shall be in lieu
of or credited toward, but not in addition to, any
03-1113
12/17/03
o
impact fees in a manner as determined by the
County. (B&M)
Dedication. The following rights-of-way on the Property
shall be dedicated, free and unrestricted, to
Chesterfield County.
ao
These dedications shall be in conjunction with
recordation of the initial subdivision plat or
prior to any final site plan approval for the
development, whichever occurs first. The exact
location of these rights-of-way shall be approved
by the Transportation Department.
(i)
A ninety (90) foot wide right-of-way for
Otterdale Road Extension from its existing
termination to the southern Property line.
(ii) A ninety (90) foot wide right-of-way for the
East/West Connection from the eastern Property
line to the western Property line.
Forty-five (45) feet of right-of-way on the north
side of Beach Road measured from the centerline of
that part of Beach Road immediately adjacent to the
Property frontage shall be dedicated in conjunction
with recordation of the initial subdivision plat or
prior to any final site plan approval for the
development of Property adjacent to Beach Road or
within sixty (60) days after a request by the
Transportation Department, whichever occurs first.
(T)
Access Plan.
o
so
Prior to any site plan or tentative subdivision
approval, whichever occurs first, a conceptual
access plan for 0tterdale Road Extension and for
the East/West Connection shall be submitted to and
approved by the Transportation Department. Access
for this development shall conform to the approved
access plan or as otherwise approved by the
Transportation Department.
bo
There shall be no access or road connection from
the Property to Dry Creek Road.
C o
Access from the Property to Beach Road shall be
limited to Otterdale Road Extension. (T)
Transportation. To provide an adequate roadway system
at the time of complete development, the Developer shall
be responsible for the following improvements.
Alternate road improvements, as requested by the
Developer and approved by the Transportation Department,
which will provide acceptable levels of service as
determined by the Transportation Department, may be
substituted for the road improvements identified in this
condition. If any of the improvements are provided by
others, or if they are determined unnecessary by the
Transportation Department as demonstrated by updated
traffic studies acceptable to the Transportation
Department, then the specific required improvement shall
03-1114
12/17/03
no longer be required by the Developer. The road
improvements shall be phased in accordance with the
phasing plan outlined herein.
ao
Construction of Otterdale Road and Otterdale Road
Extension to VDOT urban minor arterial standards
(50 MPH) with modifications by the Transportation
Department as:
(±)
A four-lane, divided road section from Route
360 to the Hampton Park Drive intersection.
(ii) A four-lane, undivided road section from
Hampton Park Drive through the East/West
Connection intersection to a two-lane road
1,000 feet south of the intersection
(approximately 400' of full width lane with a
600' taper).
(iii) A two-lane, undivided road section from
approximately 1,000 feet south of the
East/West Connection intersection to Beach
Road.
Construction of the East/West Connection to VDOT
urban minor arterial standards (50 MPH) with
modifications by the Transportation Department as a
two-lane, undivided road section from the eastern
Property line to the western Property line.
Construction of left and right turn lanes along
Otterdale Road Extension and the East/West
Connection at each approved access, including at
the Otterdale Road Extension and the East/West
Connection intersection, if warranted, based on
Transportation Department standards.
do
Construction of the Otterdale Road Extension
intersection with Beach Road as a three-lane
section consisting of a northbound lane and two
southbound lanes. The exact length of this
improvement shall be approved by the Transportation
Department.
so
Construction of a right turn lane and a left turn
along Beach Road at the Otterdale Road Extension
intersection.
f o
Construction of dual left turn lanes from westbound
Route 360 to southbound Otterdale Road.
go
Construction of a third left turn lane from
westbound Route 360 to southbound Otterdale Road
with an additional lane of pavement (receiving
lane) from Route 360 to Hampton Park Drive.
Construction of dual right turn lanes along
northbound Otterdale Road at its intersection with
Route 360. The exact length of this improvement
shall be approved by the Transportation Department.
03-1115
12/17/03
me
no
oo
Full cost of traffic signal installation for the
following intersections, if warranted, based on
Transportation Department standards:
(i) Route 360 and Otterdale Road.
(ii) Otterdale Road Extension and the East/West
Connection.
(iii) Otterdale Road and Hampton Park Drive.
(iv) Route 360 and Hampton Park Drive.
Construction of left and right turn lanes along
Otterdale Road at the Hampton Park Drive
intersection, if warranted, based on Transportation
Department standards.
Construction of dual left turn lanes from westbound
Route 360 to southbound Hampton Park Drive with an
additional lane of pavement (receiving lane) on
Hampton Park Drive to Ashbrook Parkway.
Construction of dual right turn lanes along
northbound Hampton Park Drive at its intersection
with Route 360. The exact length of this
improvement shall be approved by the Transportation
Department.
WITHDRAWN
Dedication to Chesterfield County, free and
unrestricted, of any additional right-of-way (or
easements) required for the improvements identified
and phased as outlined herein. In the event the
Developer is unable to acquire the right-of-way
necessary for the road improvements as described,
the Developer may request, in writing, the County
to acquire such right-of-way as a public road
improvement. All costs associated with the
acquisition of the right-of-way shall be borne by
the Developer. In the event the County chooses not
to assist the Developer in acquisition of the ~off-
site" right-of-way, the Developer shall be relieved
of the obligation to acquire the "off-site" right-
of-way, and only provide the road improvement that
can be accommodated within available right-of-way
as determined by the Transportation Department.
The phasing of these improvements shall be as
outlined herein unless otherwise requested by the
Developer and approved by the Transportation
Department.
(i)
Prior to recordation of a cumulative total of
more than 400 single family detached
residential units (or equivalent densities as
approved by the Transportation Department),
the Developer shall construct the improvements
specified in proffers 8.a.(i), 8.f. as dual
turn lanes and 8.h. as a single right turn
lane from northbound Otterdale Road to Route
360, unless it is demonstrated by an updated
03-1116
12/17/03
10.
11.
traffic study (acceptable to the
Transportation Department), that any of these
improvements are not yet needed (as determined
by the Transportation Department) then a
revised phasing plan indicating the changes to
the road improvements shall be submitted to
and approved by the Transportation Department.
(ii) Prior to recordation of a cumulative total of
more than 500 single family detached
residential units (or equivalent densities as
approved by the Transportation Department),
the Developer shall construct the Otterdale
Road Extension in 8.a.(ii) and (iii) from its
existing terminus to Beach Road, 8.d., and
8.e., unless it is demonstrated by an updated
traffic study (acceptable to the
Transportation Department) that any of these
improvements are not yet needed (as determined
by the Transportation Department) (except for
the completion of Otterdale Road Extension
from its then existing terminus to Beach road
as a two-lane road) then a revised phasing
plan indicating the changes to the road
improvements shall be submitted to and
approved by the Transportation Department.
(iii) Prior to recordation of a cumulative total of
more than 1200 single family detached
residential units (or equivalent densities as
approved by the Transportation Department),
the Developer shall construct 8.g., 8.h., 8.k.
and 8.1. unless it is demonstrated by an
updated traffic study (acceptable to the
Transportation Department) that these
improvements are not yet needed (as determined
by the Transportation Department) then a
revised phasing plan indicating the changes to
the road improvements shall be submitted to
and approved by the Transportation Department.
(iv) Prior to recordation of any subdivision plat
or final approval of any site plan a phasing
plan of the remaining road improvements shall
be submitted to and approved by the
Transportation Department. Such phasing plan
shall include the above referenced phases.
(T)
Manufactured Homes. Manufactured Homes shall not be
permitted on the Property. (P)
Buffers Along Roads. The buffers required by Section
17-70 of the Subdivision Ordinance along roads shall be
located within recorded open space. (P)
Transportation Densities. For traffic planning
purposes, the maximum density of the Property shall be
70,000 square feet of shopping center, 30,000 square
feet of general office, 1,220 single family detached
residential units, 650 retirement community units, and
400 condominiums or townhouses or equivalent densities
as approved by the Transportation Department. (T)
03-1117
12/17/03
12.
13.
Covenant. Prior to recordation of any subdivision plat
or final approval of any site plan, the Developer shall
record the following covenant for the Property:
~Certain roads within the Property are intended to
connect to an existing or a future road. Notice is
hereby given to all persons interested in purchasing or
living within the development that such road connections
are planned. Each road that is intended to extend or
connect to other roads is shown on the overall road plan
attached to these covenants. Any such road is also
posted with a sign (located at its temporary terminus)
stating ~Future road extension."" (T)
Pedestrian Tunnel. In conjunction with the construction
of the improvements noted in Proffer 8.a.(ii), the
Developer shall construct a pedestrian tunnel,
acceptable to the Transportation Department, under
Otterdale Road near its current terminus which will link
the existing walking trials within Hampton Park. (T)
14. Landscaping.
15.
In conjunction with the construction of the
improvements noted in Proffer 8.a.(ii), if approved
by the owners of the open space the Developer shall
install a double row of evergreen trees (at least
five feet tall at the time of planting) within the
existing recorded open space that parallels
Otterdale Road and is located within Hampton Park.
These evergreens shall be installed in the open
space where adjacent to the residential lots along
Otterdale Road that are south of the intersection
of Otterdale Road and Hampton Park Drive and north
of the stormwater management facilities. A
landscape plan showing these improvements shall be
submitted to the Planning Department for approval
at the time of submittal of road construction plans
for that section of Otterdale Road set forth in
8.a.(ii). the evergreens shall be installed between
5 feet and 12 feet on center, based on the species
selected by the Developer for such installation.
(p)
bo
A single row of evergreen trees (at least five feet
tall at the time of planting) shall be installed
adjacent to the property line with Ashbrook
Subdivision. This landscaping shall be installed
in recorded open space. The evergreens shall be
installed between five (5) feet and twelve (12)
feet on center, based on the species selected by
the Developer for such installation. A landscape
plan depicting these improvements shall be
submitted to the Planning Department for review and
approval in conjunction with the submission of a
final check plat. The installation of landscaping
may be phased upon approval of a phasing plan by
the Planning Department. (P)
House Size. For lots adjacent to Hampton Park and west
of Otterdale Road Extended, the houses shall have a
minimum gross floor area of 2400 square feet. (P)
03-1118
12/17/03
16.
Open Space. An area of open space shall be established
between Hampton Park and the Property (west of Otterdale
Road) such that lots on the Property adjacent to Hampton
Park shall not include any areas designated as Resource
Protection Areas (~RPA") on county maps, and; provided,
further the open space area between the property line
for the Property and such lots abutting the RPA shall
not be less than 85 feet. (P)
17.
Best Management Practice (BMP) Facility. The developer
shall leave in place the temporary sediment control
devices and/or construct new BMPs or combinations of
BMPs which would achieve a maximum phosphorous runoff
limits required by the Upper Swift Creek Watershed
Ordinance Section 19-235(d)(1)a. until Chesterfield
County obtains its initial permit for the implementation
of the Upper Swift Creek Watershed Plan. (EE)
Ayes: McHale, Barber, Humphrey and Miller.
Nays: Warren.
Mr. Barber requested that, if tools are available
managing growth, they be provided to the Board.
for
Mr. Warren suggested that Board members read the memo
provided by the County Attorney listing ways of managing
growth.
Mr. Warren then made a motion, seconded by Mr. Barber, for
the Board to direct the County Administrator to distribute a
list of growth management tools to the Board of Supervisors.
Mr. Miller expressed concerns that nothing has been done
since the Growth Summit to address the growth management
issue. He stated he would be supportive of any reasonable
growth management tools.
Mr. Warren called for a vote on his motion, seconded by Mr.
Barber, for the Board to direct the County Administrator to
distribute a list of growth management tools to the Board of
Supervisors.
Ayes: Warren, McHale, Barber, Humphrey and Miller.
Nays: None.
Mr. McHale made a motion, seconded by Mr. Miller, for the
Board to suspend its rules to consider items after 11:00 p.m.
Ayes: Warren, McHale, Barber, Humphrey and Miller.
Nays: None.
03SN0312
In Matoaca Magisterial District, VICTOR P. MORRISSETTE
requests rezoning and amendment of zoning district map from
Residential (R-25) to Agricultural (A). Residential use of
up to 1.0 unit per acre is permitted in an Agricultural (A)
District. The Comprehensive Plan suggests the property is
appropriate for residential use of 1 to 5 acre lots, suited
for Residential (R-88) zoning. This request lies on 67.3
acres fronting approximately 1,200 feet on the south line of
Beach Road approximately 400 feet east of Buckhorn Road, also
03-1119
12/17/03
fronting in two (2) places for a total of approximately 220
feet on the east line of Buckhorn Road approximately 800 feet
south of Beach Road. Tax IDs 740-650-6868; 740-651-3549,
6254 and 8357; 741-651-0661 and 3165 (Sheet 24).
Mr. Jacobson presented a summary of Case 03SN0312 and stated
the property was zoned by the Board in 1989 with a
requirement for public water. He further stated the Planning
Commission and staff recommend denial, indicating that the
Board denied a request in 1990 to remove the requirement for
public water.
When asked, Mr. Jacobson stated, if the property is rezoned
to Agricultural, the developer will be able to split the
property into lots of five or more acres. He further stated
there are no proffered conditions relating to manufactured
homes.
Mr. Harley Joseph, representing the applicant, expressed
concerns that the developer did not find out about the
requirement for public water until the request for a building
permit was denied. He stated public water is a mile and a
half away from the subject property and the applicant could
not pay to provide a water line for 30 residential lots.
Mrs. Humphrey requested that the developer provide an
additional proffered condition guaranteeing that no
manufactured homes would be allowed on the subject property.
Mrs. Humphrey then made a motion, seconded by Mr. Warren, for
the Board to defer Case 03SN0312 until January 14, 2004.
Ayes: Warren, McHale, Barber, Humphrey and Miller.
Nays: None.
04SN0120
In Clover Hill Magisterial District, VICTOR MORRISSETTE
requests rezoning and amendment of zoning district map from
Agricultural (A) to Residential (R-12) and relief to street
access requirements. Residential use of up to 3.63 units per
acre is permitted in a Residential (R-12) District. The
Comprehensive Plan suggests the property is appropriate for
residential use of 2.5 units per acre or less. This request
lies on 7.2 acres fronting approximately 200 feet on the east
line of Stigall Drive across from Brandenburg Drive. Tax IDs
744-681-2542 and 4918 (Sheet 16).
Ms. Beverly Rogers presented a summary of Case 04SN0120 and
stated the proposal would allow development of approximately
60 lots with only one access. She stated staff recommended
approval of the rezoning request, but did not recommend
approval of the exception to the second access requirement.
She further stated the Planning Commission recommended
approval and acceptance of the proffered conditions. She
noted the request conforms to the Central Area Land Use Plan.
Mr. Harley Joseph, representing the applicant, stated the
Planning Commission's recommendation is acceptable.
Mr. Warren called for public comment.
03-1120
12/17/03
No one came forward to speak to the request.
On motion of Mr. Warren, seconded by Mrs. Humphrey, the Board
approved Case 04SN0120 and accepted the following proffered
conditions:
The public water and wastewater systems shall be used.
(u)
o
Except for timbering approved by the Virginia State
Department of Forestry for the purpose of removing dead
and diseased trees, there shall be no timbering on the
Property until a land disturbance permit has been
obtained from the Environmental Engineering Department
and the approved devices have been installed. (EE)
Development shall be limited to a maximum of twelve (12)
lots. (P)
The applicant, subdivider~ or assignee(s) shall pay the
following to The County of Chesterfield prior to the
issuance of building permit for infrastructure
improvements within the service district for the
Property:
$9,000 per dwelling unit, if paid prior to July 1,
2003; or the amount approved by the Board of
Supervisors not to exceed $9,000 per dwelling unit
adjusted upward by any increase in the Marshall and
Swift Building Cost Index between July 1, 2002 and
July 1 of the fiscal year in which the payment is
made, if paid after June 30, 2003.
In the event the cash payments not used for the purpose
for which proffered within 15 years of receipt, the cash
shall be returned in full to the payor. (B&M)
5. The minimum gross floor area for dwellings shall be:
a. one story - 1,300 square feet
b. more than one story - 1,850 square feet. (BI)
Ayes: Warren, McHale, Barber, Humphrey and Miller.
Nays: None.
0~SN0115 (Amended)
In Bermuda Magisterial District, CESARE M. EVOLA AND TERESA
B. EVOLA request rezoning and amendment of zoning district
map from Agricultural (A) and Community Business (C-3) to
Neighborhood Business (C-2). The density of such amendment
will be controlled by zoning conditions or Ordinance
standards. The Comprehensive Plan suggests the property is
appropriate for neighborhood mixed use. This request lies on
1.2 acres fronting approximately 200 feet on the north line
of West Hundred Road, across from Inge Road. Tax IDs 814-
652-6781, 7781 and 7994 (Sheet 27).
Ms. Beverly Rogers presented a summary, of Case 04SN0!15 and
stated the Planning Commission and ~taff *~ecommend approval
and acceptance of the proffered conditions. She noted the
request conforms to the Consolidated Eastern Area Plan. She
03-1121
12/17/03
stated concerns were raised at the Planning Commission
meeting by area property owners relative to the potential
closing of a crossover that aligned Inge Road.
Mr. Jeff Collins, representing the applicant,
recommendation is acceptable.
stated the
Mr. Warren called for public comment.
No one came forward to speak to the request.
On motion of Mr. McHale, seconded by Mr. Warren, the Board
approved Case 04SN0115 and accepted the following proffered
conditions:
Direct access from the property to Route 10 shall be
limited to one (1) entrance/exit. The exact location of
this access shall be determined by the Transportation
Department. Prior to any site plan approval, an access
easement, acceptable to the Transportation Department,
shall be recorded from Route 10 to the adjacent property
to the east (Tax ID 8146529588). (T)
Prior to any site plan approval, one-hundred (100) feet
of right-of-way measured from the centerline of Route 10
immediately adjacent to the property shall be dedicated,
free and unrestricted, to and for the benefit of
Chesterfield County. (T)
Prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy, the
developer shall: 1) construct an additional lane of
pavement along Route 10 for the entire property
frontage; and 2) close the existing crossover on Route
10 that aligns with the property and Inge Road, if
approved by VDOT. The developer shall dedicate, free and
unrestricted, to and for the benefit of Chesterfield
County, any additional right-of-way required for these
improvements. (T)
o
The public water and wastewater systems shall be used.
(u)
Ayes: Warren, McHale, Barber, Humphrey and Miller.
Nays: None.
19. ADJOURNMENT
On motion of Mr. McHale, seconded by Mr. Barber, the Board
adjourned at 1:06 a.m. until January 14, 2004 at 4:00 p.m.
Ayes: Warren, McHale, Barber, Humphrey and Miller.
Nays: None.
L~e B. Ramsey ~,~-
County Administrator
Arthur S. Warren
Chairman
03-1122
12/17/03