91SN0218-Jr~ty-!6~
J~ly 24, 1991 BS
REQUEST ANALYSIS
AND
RECOMMENDATION
91SN0218
Ukrops Supermarkets, Inc.
Matoaca Magisterial District
West line of Memory Lane
REQUEST:
Amendment to Conditional Use Planned Development (Case 84S082)
relative to commercial parking within an Office Business (0) District
and required buffers between the Office Business (0) and Convenience
Business (B-i) tracts.
PROPOSED LAND USE:
An employee parking lot, for an existing grocery store located in a
commercial tract at Chesterfield Meadows, is planned on the Office
Business (0) tract. Pedestrian access, through a buffer located
between the Convenience Business (B-l) and Office Business (O) tracts,
is also planned.
PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION
RECOMMEND APPROVAL SUBJECT TO THE CONDITIONS ON PAGE 2.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Recommend approval for the following reasons:
The proposed parking lot would have no greater impact upon area
development than those Office Business (O) uses currently permitted on
the property.
Given the existing office development on adjacent property to the
east, along Memory Lane, an appropriate land use transition has been
established between commercial and residential tracts within
Chesterfield Meadows.
Amendment of the buffer condition would facilitate pedestrian access
between the office and commercial tracts.
(NOTE: THE CONDITIONS NOTED WITH "STAFF/CPC" WERE AGREED UPON BY BOTH STAFF AND
TttE COMMISSION. CONDITIONS WITH ONLY A "STAFF" ARE RECOMMENDED SOLELY BY STAFF.
CONDITIONS WITH ONLY A "CPC" ARE ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS RECOMMENDED BY TIIE
PLANNING COMMISSION.)
CONDITIONS
(STAFF/CPC) 1.
(STAFF/CPC) 2.
(NOTES: a.
In addition to the uses permitted on the Office Business (0)
tract, parking areas which are accessory to the uses in the
Convenience Business (B-l) tract to the west shall be
permitted. (P)
Pedestrian access through the required buffer between the
Office Business (0) tract and the Convenience Business (B-I)
tract shall be permitted.
These conditions are in addition to the Textual Statement
and conditions of zoning for Case 84S082.
Except as stated herein, all previously imposed conditions
and Textual Statamant for 84S082 remain in effect.)
GENERAL INFORMATION
Location:
West line of Memory Lane, south of Centralia Road.
Tax Map 96-9 (5)
Chesterfield Meadows Office Park, Part of Lot 1 and Tax Map 96-9 (1) Part
of Parcel 1 (Sheet 31).
Existing Zoning:
O and B-1 with Conditional Use Planned Development (Chesterfield Meadows)
Size:
1.2 acres
Existing Land Use:
Vacant
Adjacent Zoning & Land Use:
North - 0 with Conditional Use Planned Development; Vacant
South - 0 with Conditional Use Planned Development; Vacant
East - 0 with Conditional Use Planned Development; Office
West - B-1 with Conditional Use Planned Development; Commercial
PUBLIC FACILITIES
Utilities; Drainage and Erosion; Fire Service; and Transportation:
These amendments will have no impact upon these facilities.
91SN0218/PC/JULY240
LAND USE
General Plan:
Lies within the boundaries of the Central Area Land Use and Transportation
Plan, which designates the property for office and light commercial use.
Area Development Trends:
The request property lies within an office tract of Chesterfield Meadows
mixed use development.
Zoning History:
On November 18, 1984, the Board of Supervisors, upon a favorable
recommendation by the Planning Commission, approved rezoning with
Conditional Use Planned Development on the request property and surrounding
area to permit a mixed use development with residential, office, and
commercial uses (Chesterfield Meadows). Uses on the request property were
restricted to either Office Business (0) or Residential (R-12) uses.
Site Design:
The proposed employee parking lot would occupy the majority of the site and
have vehicular access to Memory Lane. Pedestrian access, between the
parking lot and adjacent commercial tract to the west (Chesterfield Meadows
Shopping Center), would be provided for employees through a previously.
required buffer. Previously imposed conditions of zoning address interior
parking area landscaping and access and would remain applicable if this
request is approved.
Conclusions:
As noted herein, the request property could be developed for a number of
office and residential uses. The proposed employee parking lot would have
no greater impact upon area development than those Office Business (0) uses
currently permitted on the property. In addition, given the existing
office development on adjacent property to the east, along Memory Lane, an
appropriate land use transition has been established between commercial and
residential tracts within Chesterfield Meadows. Therefore, approval of
this request is recommended.
CASE HISTORY
Planning Commission Meeting (7/16/91):
The applicant accepted the recommendation.
There was no opposition present.
3 91SN0218/PC/JULY240
On motion of Mr. Miller, seconded by Mr. Perkins, the Commission
recommended approval of this request, subject to the conditions on pa§e 2.
AYES: Messrs. Warren, Perkins, Miller and Mrs. Boisineau.
A~$ENT: Mr. 5elcher.
The Board of Supervisors on Wednesday, July 24, 1991, beginning at 2:00 p.m.,
will take under consideration this request.
91SN0218/PC/JULY240
A