Loading...
91SN0200July 24, 1991BS REQUEST ANALYSIS AND RECOMMENDATION 91SN0200 Henry E. Myers, Jr. Matoaca Magisterial District Southwest line of Iron Bridge Road REQUEST: Rezoning from Agricultural (A) to Community Business (C-3). PROPOSED LAND USE: Commercial uses are planned. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION RECOMMEND APPROVAL AND ACCEPTANCE OF THE PROFFERED CONDITIONS ON PAGES 2 AND 3. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Recommend approval, subject to the applicant addressing the transportation concerns, as outlined herein. This recommendation is made for the following reasons: The applicant has failed to address the transportation concerns outlined in the Transportation Section of this "Request Analysis and Recommendation." If these concerns are not adequately addressed, denial of this request would be appropriate. Although the Central Area Land Use and Transportation Plan designates the request property and surrounding area for office use, adjacent properties to the southeast, east and west have been zoned and developed commercially. Therefore, the proposed Community Business (C-3) zoning and land uses conform to area zoning and development trends. Adjacent property to the southwest is zoned Agricultural (A) and is currently vacant; however, it is anticipated that this property will eventually be developed for residential uses. Access for any residential development on this property is required, by conditions of a previous zoning, to be provided to Greenyard Road (Case 89SN0104). Therefore, the proposed commercial zoning and land use on the request property should have a minimal impact on future residential development on this adjacent property. The development standards of the "new" Zoning Ordinance and the proffered conditions ensure quality development and further ensure land use compatibility with future area residential development on adjacent property to the southwest. (NOTE: THE CONDITIONS NOTED WITH "STAFF/CPC" WERE AGREED UPON BY BOTH STAFF AND THE COMMISSION. CONDITIONS WITH ONLY A "STAFF" ARE RECOMMEIfDED SOLELY BY STAFF. CONDITIONS WITH ONLY A "CPC" ARE ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS RECOMMENDED BY TI{E PLANNING COMMISSION,) PROFFERED CONDITIONS (STAFF/CPC) 1. The following uses shall be excluded from the permitted C-3 USES: Me g. h. i. Cocktail lounges and nightclubs Fraternal uses Hospitals Hotels Laboratories Pawn shops and second-hand shops Taxidermies Theaters Commercial kennels (STAFF/CPC) 2. (STAFF/CPC) 3. The architectural treatment of all buildings shall be similar to, and equal in quality to, Chesterfield Meadows West Shopping Center. Detailed renderings depicting these requirements shall be submitted to the Planning Department for approval in conjunction with the site plan review. Public sewer shall be used. (STAFF/CPC) 4. Prior to obtaining a building permit, one of the following shall be accomplished for fire protection: For building permits obtained on or before June 30, 1991, the owner/developer shall pay to the County $150.00 per 1,000 square feet of gross floor area. If the building permit is obtained after June 30, 1991, the amount of the required payment shall be adjusted upward or downward by the same percentage that the Marshall Swift Building Cost Index increased or decreased between June 30, 1991, and the date of payment. With the approval of the County's Fire Chief, the owner/developer shall receive a credit toward the required payment for the cost of any fire suppression system not otherwise required by law which is included as a part of the development. OR The owner/developer shall provide a fire suppression system not otherwise required by law which the County's 2 91SN0200/PC/JULY24M Fire Chief determines substantially reduces the need for County facilities otherwise for the protection. (STAFF/CPC) Access to Iron Bridge Road shall be limited to the existing site road that serve the Chesterfield Meadows West Shopping Center located towards the southern property line; a right-turn-in only on Iron Bridge Road located approximately 250 feet north of the site road's intersection with Iron Bridge Road; and one (1) additional entrance/exit located approximately midway between Iron Bridge Road's intersections with Centralia and Krause Roads. The exact location of accesses shall be approved by the Transportation Department. (STAFF/CPC) To provide for an adequate roadway system at the time of complete development, the developer shall be responsible for the following: Construction of additional pavement and curb and gutter along the southbound lanes of Iron Bridge Road for the entire property frontage to provide a turn lane. bo Construction of additional pavement and curb and gutter along the existing site access road at its intersection with Iron Bridge Road to improve the radius along the in-bound lane (i.e., northwest corner of intersection). Closing the existing crossover on Iron Bridge Road adjacent to the property, unless otherwiJe approved by the Transportation Department. (STAFF/CPC) (STAFF/CPC) Full cost of any traffic signal modifications warranted by the proffered improvements, excluding relocation of the pole or upgrade to mast arms, at the Centralia Road/site road/Iron Bridge Road intersection. Prior to any site plan approval, a phasing plan for required road improvements shall be submitted to, and approved by, the Transportation Department. The existing spring site may be renovated and restored. The existing spring site shall not be eliminated by the development of this property.. GENERAL INFORMATION Location: Southwest line of Iron Bridge Road, across from Centralia Road. Tax Map 95-12 (t) Part of Parcel 44 (Sheet 31). 3 91SN0200/PC/JULY24M Existing Zoning: A, and A with Conditional Use Planned Development Size: 3.0 acres Existing Land Use: Office or vacant Adjacent Zoning & Land Use: North - A, and A with Conditional Use; Commercial or vacant South - A; Yacant East - B-B; Commercial West - B-1 with Conditional Use Planned Development; Office and commercial PUBLIC FACILITIES Utilities Water: Use of the public water system is required by Ordinance (Chapter 20, Article II) and intended. Adequate flow and pressure should be available to supply the domestic and fire protection needs for the proposed uses. Wastewater: Use of the public wastewater system intended (Proffered Condition 3) and may be required by Ordinance, if proposed uses utilize more than 3,000 gallons of water per day. Drainage and Erosion: Drains southwest and ultimately to Swift Creek via tributaries and a downstream pond (Tyler's Pond). Existing downstream pond experiencing silt build-up and, due to on-site conditions, the existing dam spillway on this pond is not functioning. Dam failure could occur from additional runoff due to development of the request property. On-site retention/detention should be utilized, based upon a ten (10) year post-development storm event and a two (2) year pre-development release rate. Off-site easements and drainage improvements may be required. Fire Service: Chester Fire Station, Company #1. Provide County water flows and fire hydrants for fire protection purposes in compliance with nationally recognized standards (i.e., National Fire Protection Association and Insurance Services Office). 4 91SN0200/PC/JULY24M The proposed zoning and land uses will generate additional need for fire protection services. Proffers have been received to address this need. (Proffered Condition 4) Transportation: This request will not limit development to a specific land use; therefore, it is difficult to anticipate traffic generation. Based on fast-food restaurant with drive-through window trip rates, development could generate approximately 3,793 average daily trips. These vehicles will be distributed along Iron Bridge Road (Route 10) which had a 1989 traffic count of 23,100 vehicles per day. The Thoroughfare Plan identifies Iron Bridge Road as a major arterial with a recommended right of way width of 120 to 200 feet. The applicant is unwilling to dedicate 100 feet of right of way, measured from the centerline of Iron Bridge Road, in accordance.with that Plan. Development of this property must adhere to the Zoning Ordinance relative to access and internal circulation (Article 7). There is an existing crossover along Iron Bridge Road between the intersections of Krause Road and Centralia Road. In accordance with the approved crossover plan, the applicant has proffered to close that existing crossover. (Proffered Condition 6. c.) In conjunction with development of the adjacent property to the south (i.e., Chesterfield Meadows West Shopping Center), a site access road was constructed on the subject property aligning the Centralia/Iron Bridge Roads intersection. The applicant has proffered that direct access to Iron Bridge Road will be provided via the site access ~oad; an entrance/exit located approximately midway between the intersections of Krause Road and Centralia Road; and a right-turn in-only entrance located approximately 250 feet north of the Centralia Road/site access road/Iron Bridge Road intersection. (Proffered Condition 5) Mitigating road improvements must be provided for the requested densities to achieve an acceptable level of service. The applicant has proffered to construct the following: additional pavement and curb and gutter along Iron Bridge Road for the entire property frontage; additional pavement and curb and gutter along the existing site access road to improve the radius in the northwest corner which will provide a four-lane typical section at its intersection with Iron Bridge Road; and full cost of signal modification at the Centralia Road/site access road/Iron Bridge Road intersection excluding relocation of any poles or upgrade to mast arms (Proffered Condition 6). However, the applicant has not agreed to provide a right-turn lane along Route 10 at each approved access. Without a commitment to dedicate right of way along Iron Bridge Road and provide right-turn lanes, the Transportation Department cannot support this request. 5 91SN0200/PC/JULY24M LAND USE General Plan: Lies within the boundaries of the Central Area Land Use and Transportation plan, which designates the property for office use. Area Development Trends: Property along this portion of Iron Bridge Road is zoned agriculturally or commercially and is occupied by a mix of office and commercial uses or remains vacant. Zoning History: On February 7, 1973, the Board of Zoning Appeals granted a special exception on the request property to permit a two-family dwelling (Case 73A018). On July 24, 1972, the Board of Supervisors, upon a favorable recommendation by the Planning Commission, approved a Conditional Use Planned Development to permit conversion of the previously approved two-family dwelling to office use (Case 74S079). Site Design: The request property lies within an Emerging Growth Area. Within Emerging Growth Areas, uses that have drive-in windows and uses with gasoline pumps are only permitted when incorporated into a project of one (1) or more parcels with an aggregate size of ten (10) acres or more. The request property consists of three (3) acres; however, access to Iron Bridge Road, for the request property and the adjacent shopping center to the south (Chesterfield Meadows West), is designed to be shared. The combined acreage of the request property and adjacent shopping center exceeds the ten (10) acre requirement. Architectural Treatment: In addition to the requirements of the Zoning Ordinance, the applicant has proffered that all buildings will be similar to, and equal in quality to, Chesterfield Meadows West Shopping Center, located on adjacent property to the southeast. (Proffered Condition 2) Buffers & Screening: Adjacent property to the south is zoned Agricultural (A) and is currently vacant. The Plan designates this property for residential use. Therefore, the Zoning Ordinance requires a seventy-five (75) foot buffer along the southern boundary of the proposed Community Business (C-3) tract, adjacent to this agriculturally zoned property. 91SN0200/PC/JULY24M Conclusions: Although the Central Area Land Use and Transportation Plan designates the request property for office use, adjacent properties to the east and west have been zoned and developed commercially. The proposed Community Business (C-3) zoning and land use conform to area zoning and development trends. In addition, although adjacent property to the south is zoned Agricultural (A) and is currently vacant, it is anticipated that this adjacent property will eventually be developed for residential uses. Access for any residential development on this adjacent property is required, by conditions of a previous rezoning, to be provided to Greenyard Road (Case 89SN0104). As a consequence, residential development would be oriented away from commercial development along Iron Bridge Road and towards existing residential development to the south. Given access ~equirements, the development standards of the "new" Zoning Ordinance and the proffered conditions, quality development and land use compatibility, with future area residential development on adjacent property to the south, can be ensured. However, as noted herein, the applicant has failed to adequately address transportation issues, as discussed in the Transportation Section of this "Request Analysis and Recox~endation." Approval of this request would only be appropriate if the transportation impacts are adequately addressed. CASE HISTORY Planning Commission Meeting (6/18/91): The applicant indicated that installation of an additional lane of pavement, in excess of that already proffered, along Route 10 plus dedication of additional right of way along Route 10 would render development uneconomically feasible. The Transportation Department stated that the requested improvements are necessary to facilitate anticipated traffic flows in the area. Mr. Belcher stated that the additional improvements requested by the Transportation Department were excessive and, in his opinion, not exclusively necessitated by this development. The applicant agreed to preserve the historic spring site which is located on the property. On motion of Mr. Belcher, seconded by Mr. Perkins, the Commission reco~nended approval of this request and acceptance of the proffered conditions on pages 2 and 3. AYES: Messrs. Warren, Perkins, Belcher and Mrs. Boisineau. ABSTAIN: Mr. Miller. 7 91SN0200/PC/JULY24M Applicant (7/1/91): The applicant submitted Proffered Condition 8 in writing. The Board of Supervisors on Wednesday, July 24, 1991, beginning at 2:00 p.m., will take under consideration this request. 91SN0200/PC/JULY24M M E ' CO/M/V~ONS · ,4 ,'FIELD · - · ' /'.AEADOV4~: ' ' N THIS PLAT DOE% NoT E'EFLECT THE ADDiTiONAL E~IGHT OF WAY TAKEN FOR TI-IF_ 9klIDENING OF I~OUTE I0 q ISNOZO0-1