04SN0133-Feb25.pdfx~ ..... ~,~- ~0 '~n~ CPC
Febm~ 25, 2004 BS
STAFF'S
REQUEST ANALYSIS
RECOMMENDATION
04SN0133
'Gary T. and Bonnie A. Jennings
Matoaca Magisterial District
Grange Hall Elementary School, Swift Creek Middle School and
Clover Hill High School Attendance Zones
South line of Hull Street ROad
REQUEST:
Rezoning from Agricultural (A) to Residential (R-12) on 29.8 acres plus a
Conditional Use planned Development on 7.9 acres relative to access .in an
Agricultural (A) DistriCt.
PROPOSED LAND USE:
A single family residemial subdivision with a maximum of fifty-five (55) lots is
planned, yielding a density of approximately 1.9 dwelling units per acre.
PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION
RECOMMEND APPROVAL AND ACCEPTANCE OF THE PROFFERED CONDITIONS ON
PAGES 2 THROUGH 5.
OxlOTE: PROFFERED CONDITION 14 WAS SUBMITTED SUBSEQUENT TO THE
COMMISSION'S CONSIDERATION OF THIS CASE.)
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Recommend approval for the following reason:
The proposed zoning and land uses conform with the Upper Swift Creek Plan
which .suggests that the northern portion of the' property, north of the future
Hampton Park Drive Extended, is appropriate for office and residential
Providing a FIRST CHOICE CommUnity Through Excellence in Public Service.
development of up to ten (10) units per acre, while the southern portion of the
property, south of the proposed Hampton Park Drive Extended, is appropriate for
single family residential development of two (2) units per acre or less.
The applicant has presented an overall access plan for the area to address
transportation concerns relative to the separation of access points along Hull
Street Road.
(NOTE: CONDITIONS .MAY BE IMPOSED OR THE PROPERTY OWNER MAY PROFFER
CONDITIONS ON THE CONDITIONAL USE PLANNED DEVELopMENT PORTION OF
THE REQUEST. THE ONLY CONDITION THAT MAY BE IMPOSED ON THE REZONING.
PORTION OF THE REQUEST IS A' BUFFER CONDITION. THE PROPERTY OWNER(S)
MAY PROFFER' OTHER CONDITIONS. THE CONDITIONS NOTED WITH "STAFF/CPC"
WERE AGREED UPON BY BOTH STAFF AND THE COMMISSION. CONDITIONS WITH
ONLY A "STAFF" ARE RECOMMENDED SOLELY BY STAFF. CONDITIONS WITH
ONLY A "CPC" ARE ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS RECOMMENDED BY THE PLANNING
COMMISSION.)
PROFFERED CONDITIONS
(STAFF/CPC) 1.
(STAFF/CPC) 2.
(STAFF/CPC) 3.
(STAFF/CPC)
Public water and wastewater shall be used. (U)
The applicant, subdivider, or assignee(s) shall pay the following to
the county of Chesterfield prior to the issuance, of a building
permit, for infrastructure improvements with in the service district
for the prOperty:
A. $9,000.00 per dWelling unit, if paid prior to July 1, 2003; or
The amount approved by the Board of Supervisors not to exceed
$9,000:00 per dwelling unit adjusted upward by any
increase, in the Marshall and Swift building Cost-index
between July 1, 2002,- and July 1 of the fiscal year in which
the payment is made if paid after June 30, 2003.'
In the event the cash payment is not used for which proffered
within 15 years of receipt, the-cash shall be returned in full
to the payor. (B&M)
Except 'for timbering approved by the Virginia State Department of
Forestry for the purpose of removing dead or diseased trees, there
shall be. no timbering on it he Property until, a land disturbance
permit has been obtained from the' Environmental Engineering
Department and the approved devices installed. (EE)
Direct access from the property to Hull Street Road (Route 360)
shall be limited to one (1) public road (the "Public Road"). The
2 04SN0133-FEB25'Bos
(STAFF/CPC)
(STAFF/CPC)
(STAFF/CPC)
o
o
exact location of this access shall be approved by the
Transportation Department. Prior to any construction plan
approval, an:access easement acceptable to the Transportation
Department shall be recorded from the Public Road to the adjacent
property to the east (Tax ID # 708-667-8988) and to the adjacent
-property to the west (Tax ID # 708-666-5170). (T)
In conjunction with the recordation of the initial subdivision plat,
one hundred (100) feet of right of'way on-the south side of Hull
Street 'Road, measured from the centerline of that part of Hull
street Road immediately adjacent to the property, shall be
dedicated, free and unrestricted, to and for the benefit of
Chesterfield County. (T)
In-conjUnction with recordation of the initial subdivision plat a
ninety (90) foot wide right-of-way fOr an east/west arterial
("Hampton Park Drive Extended") from the eastern property line to
the western property line Shall be dedicated, free and unrestricted,
to and for the benefit of Chesterfield County. The exact location of
this right-of-way shall be approved by the Transportation
Department. (T)
To provide an adequate roadway sYstem at the time of complete
development, the owner/developer shall be responsible for the
following:
ao
Construction of additional pax(ement along Route 360 at the
Public Road intersection to provide a right.turn lane, if
warranted, based on Transportation Department standards;
b.
Closing the exist'rog crossover on Route' 360 located
approximately tWo hundred (200) feet' east of the property
and construction of a new crossover, including left mm
lanes along 'both the eastbound and westbound, lanes, on
'Route 360 at the Public Road intersection. If the Virginia
Department of Transportation does not approve the closing
of the existing crossover and constructing-the new
crossover, the developer shall then be required to construct
an eastbound left turn lane at the existing crossover on
Route 360 located approximately two hundred (200) feet
east of the property;
Co
Construction of two (2) lanes of Hampton Park Drive
Extended through the property to VDOT urban minor
3 04SN0133-FEB25-BOS
(STAFF/CPC)
(STAFF/CPC)
arterial standards (50 mph), with modifications approved by
the Transportation Department;
Construction of the Public Road as a three (3) lane. typical
section at the Route 360 intersection. The exact length, of
this improvement shall be determined by the Transportation
Department;
eo
Construction of an additional lane of pavement along Route
360 from the Public Road to the eastern property line of the
adjacent parcel(Tax ID 708-667-8988);
Construction of a twenty-four (24) foot access drive from
the public road to the adjacent property (Tax ID 708-667-
8988). The exact lOCatiOn and treatment of this
improvement shall be determined by the Transportation
Department.
Dedication to Chesterfield County, free and unrestricted,
any additional right-'of-way (or easements) required for. the
improvements identified above. In the event the developer
is unable to acquire any "off-site" right-of-way that is
necessary for any improvement-described in 7 a., the
developer may request, in writing, that the County acquire
such right-of-way as a public mad improvement. All_costs
associated with the acquisitionof-the right-of-way shall be'
borne by the developer. In the event the COunty chooses
not to assist the developer in acquiSition:of the "off-site"
right:of-way, the developer;~shall, be! relieved of the
obligation to acquire the "off-site"right-of-way and' shall
provide' the road improvements within, available' right-of
way as determined bY:the Transportation Department. '(T)
Prior to. any constmcti0n plan approval, a phasing plan for 'the
required road improvements, as identified in Proffered Condition
7, shall be submitted toand approved by the Transportation
Department. The approved phasing Plan shall include providing the '
improvements described in.proffered COnditions '7a, 7b, 7e, 7f and
7g in conjunction with initial development onthe property. (T)-
The property located north of the proposed east/west arterial or
zoned Agricultural (A) and defined bythe limits of this zoning
request shall:not be subdivided other than for the Public Road .or
for the Hampton Park Drive Extended rights-of Way, nor shall any
residential building permit be issued on such property. (P)
4 04SN0133-FEB25-BO S
(STAFF/CPC)
(STAFF/CPC)
(STAFF/CPC)
(STAFF/CPC)
(STAFF)
Location:
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
The existing pond shall remain. (EE)
All exposed portions of the foundation of each dwelling unit shall
be faced with brick or stone veneer. Exposed piers supporting
front porches shall be faced with brick or stone.veneer. '(P)
The minimum gross floor area. fOr dwelling units shall be 2500
square 'feet. (BI)
The maximum density of this development shall not exceed 55
total lots. (P)
Prior to any construction plan approval, a. thirty (30) foot wide
access easement, acceptable to the Transportation Department,
shall be recorded ~om the southern property line of the adjacent
property to the east (Tax ID 708-667-8988) to the access easement
defined in Proffered Condition 4. (T)
GENERAL INFORMATION
South line of Hull Street Road, approximately 2,300 feet east of Baldwin Creek Road.
Tax IDs 708-665-9636; 708-666,7360 and 9340; 708-667-7101 and 8937; and 709-665-
3176; 709-666-2039, 3731 and 4163 (Sheets 15 and 23).
Existing Zoning:
A
Size:
37.7 acres
Existing Land Use:
Single familYresidential or vacant
Adjacent Zoning and Land Use:
North - C-2, C-3 and C-5; Commercial, single family residential or vacant
South - A; Vacant
East - A and R-9;Vacant
West - A; single family residential or vacant
5 04SN0133-FEB25-BO S
UTILITIES
Public Water System:
There is an existing twenty-four (24) inch water line that extends along the north side of
Hull Street Road and terminates adjacent to Hampton Park Drive,. approximately 7,200
feet east of .this site. In addition, there is an existing twelve (12). inch water line that
extends along the north side of Hampton Park Drive and terminates approximately. 1,600
feet east of this site. Use Of the public water system is intended. (Proffered Condition 1)
Computer generated floW tests have been performed to evaluate the water Pressure and.
flows available to serve this site. Tests indicate that a portion of this site, when served
only by an extension from the twelve (12) inch water line in HamptOn park Drive, may be
unable to achieve minimum fire flows of 1,000 gpm at 20 .psi residual. Depending upon
Fire Department requirements, it may be necessary to provide for extension of a twelve
(12) inch or larger water line across Hull Street Road to allow fora future connection to
the twenty-four (24) inch water line. Further evaluation will be necessary to determine if
portions of this site will have domestic static pressures of less than 40 psi and provision
made to provide individual booster pumps where .needed.
Public Wastewater System:
There is an existing fifteen (15) inch wastewater trunk line extending along a portion of
Dry Creek that terminates south 'of Hampton' Valley Terrace, approximately 3,600 feet
southeast of this site. The request site is within the boundary of the Upper Swift Creek
Plan which recommends use of the public wastewater system. Use of the public
wastewater system is intended. (Proffered Condition 1)
ENVIRONMENTAL
Drainage anal Erosion:
The subject property drains to the east and then via tributaries to Dry Creek and Swift
Creek Reservoir. There are currently no on- or off-site erosion problems with none
anticipated after development. The parcel is partially wooded and, as such, should not be
timbered without obtaining a land disturbance permit. This will insure that adequate
erosion control-measuresare in place prior to anY land disturbance. (Proffered Condition
3)
Water Quality:
The property is situated in 'the Upper Swift Creek Reservoir drainage basin and, as such,
will be subject to a pro-rata fee- for construction of regional BMPs and maintenance fee:
The applicant has proffered to retain the existing pond located on the'property, which will
provide additional filtering of pollutants. (Proffered Condition 10)
6 04SN0133-FEB25-BOS
PUBLIC FACILITIES
The need for fire, school, library, park and transportation facilities is identified in the Public
Facilities Plan, the Thoroughfare Plan and the Capital Improvement Program. This development
will have an impact on these facilities.
Fire Service:
The Public Facilities Plan indicates that emergency services calls are expected to increase
forty-five (45) percent by 2015. Eight (8) new fire/rescue stations are recommended for
construction by 2015 in the Plan. Based on fiftyrfive (55) dwelling units, this request will
generate approximately nine (9) calls for fire and emergency medical, services each year.
The applicant has addressed the impact on fire service. (Proffered Condition 2)-
The Clover Hill Fire/Rescue Station, Company Number 7, currently provides fire
protection and emergency medical service. When the property is developed, the number
of hydrants, quantity of water needed for fire protection and access requirements will be
evaluated during the plans review process.
Schools:
Approximately thirty (30) school age children will be generated by this development.
The site lies in the Grange Hall Elementary School attendance zone: capacity - 828,
enrollment -~ 622; Swift Creek Middle School zone: capacity - 1,027, enrollment -
1,436; and Clover Hill High School zone: capacity- 1,582, enrollment - 2,030.
This development will _have impact on the-middle and high schools involved. Two (2)
new high schools, proposed to be built by 2006, would replace Clover Hill High-School
and relieve Manchester High.
There are currently eight (8) trailers at Swift Creek Middle and seventeen (17) trailers at
Clover Hill High School. The applicant has agreed to participate in the cost of providing
for area school needs. (Proffered Condition 2)
Libraries:
Consistent with Board of Supervisors' Policy, the impact of development'-on library
services is assessed CoUnty-wide. Based on projected population groWth, the Public
Facilities Plan identifies a need for additional, library space throughout the CoUntY. Even
if the facility improvements that have been made since the Plan was published are taken~
into accoUnt, there is still an unmet need for additional library space throughout the
County.
This development would impact .'the existing Clover Hill library or one (1) of the
proposed new facilities for the western part of the County in the Genito Road and west
7 04SN0133-FEB25-BOS
Beach Road areas. The applicant has offered measures to assist in addressing the impact
of this development on these facilities. (Proffered Condition 2)~
Parks and Recreation:
The Public Facilities Plan identifies the need for,four (4) new regional parks. In addition,
there is currently a shortage '-of community park acreage in the County. The Plan
identifies a need for 625 acres of'regional park space and 116 acres of community park
space by 2015. The Plan also identifies the need for neighborhood parks and special
purpose parks and makes suggestions for their locations,
The applicant has Offered measures to assist in addressing the impact of this proposed
development on these Parks and Recreation facilities. (Proffered Condition 2)
Transportation:
The property (approximately thirty-eight (38) acres) is currently zoned Agricultural (A)
and is located just west of the Hampton Park Subdivision on the south side of Hull Street
Road (Route 360). The applicant is requesting rezoning from Agricultural (A). to
Residential- (R-12) on 29.8 acres and a Conditional Use Planned Development (CUPD) to
permit construction of public road(s) on 7.9 acres. The applicant has proffered to limit
development to a maximum of fifty-five (55). lots (Proffered. Condition .13). Based on
single family trip rates, development could generate approximately 600 average daily
trips. These vehicles will be distributed along Route 360, which had a 2003 traffic count
of 20,451 vehicles per day between Skinquarter Road and Woodlake Village Parkway.
The Thoroughfare Plan-identifies Route 360 as a major arterial with a recommended right
of way width of 120 to 200 feet. The applicant has proffered to dedicate 100 feet of right
· of way on the south side of Route 360, measured from the centerline, in accordance with
-that Plan. (Proffered Condition 5)
The Thoroughfare Plan also identifies an east/west arterial ¢'Hampton Park Drive
Extended") that passes through the' property. This proposed roadway extends from the
current endpoint of HamptOn. Park Drive through the property west to Doss Road. The
applicant has proffered to dedicate a ninety (90) foOt wide right of way through the
property in accordance with that Plan, (Proffered. Condition 6)
Access to major arterials, such'as Route 360, should be controlled. The applicant has
proffered to limit direct access from the property to Route 360 to one (1) public road (the
"Public Road") and to dedicate access easements from the Public Road to the adjacent
properties to the east (convenience store) and west (Proffered Condition 4). Construction
of the Public Road will result in approximately 100' feet of separation between the Public
Road and the convenience store's westernmost access. Access spacing along major
.arterials such as Route 360 should be approximately 500 feet; however, the applicant has
presented an overall access:plan for the area to address this issue.. (Reference attachment)
8 04 SN0133,FEB25 -BOS
The traffic impact of this development must be addressed. The applicant has proffered
to: 1) construct additional pavement .along Route 360 at the Public Road intersection to
provide a right turn lane;. 2) construct two (2) lanes of Hampton Park Drive Extended
through the property; 3) construct the Public Road as a three (3) lane typical section at its
intersection with Route 360; 4) construct an additional lane of pavement along Route 360
from the Public Road to the eastern property line of the adjacent parcel (Tax ID 708-667-
8988); 5) construct an access road from the Public Roadto the adjacent convenience store
property; and 6) close the existing crossover on Route 360 located just east of the site,
and construct a new crossover, including left turn lanes along both the eastbound and
westbound lanes, at the Public Road intersection (Proffered Condition 7). The existing
Route 360 crossover currently serves the convenience store on the soUth side of Route
360 and undeveloped commercially zoned property on the north side of Route 360. To-
provide shared use of the new crossover, the applicant has proffered to dedicate access
easements from the Public Road to the 'adjacent propertiesto the east (convenience. store)
and west (Proffered Condition 4). The applicant has also prOffered to dedicate anacces~
easement from the southern boundary of the convenience store property to the
aforementioned access easement. (Proffered Condition 14). This easement could result in
improved traffic circulation around the existing convenience store.
If VDOT does not approve closing the existing crossover-and constructing the new one,
the developer will be relieved of the requirement.to construct the new crossover and mm
lanes. In lieu of these improvements; the deVeloper will' be required to provide an
adequate left mm lane at the:existing crossover on .Route 360 located just east of the
property. (Proffered Condition 7)
The developer may need to acquire "off-site" right of way .to provide the right turn lane
along Route 360 at the Public Road intersection.. According to Proffered Condition 7, if
the developer is unable to acquire the right of way for- this improvement, the developer
may request the County. to acquire the right of way asa public road improvement. All
costs associated with the acqUisition will be borne by the developer: If the County
chooses not to assist with the right of Way acquisition, the developer will not be obligated
to acquire the "off-site" right of way, and will only be obligated to constmct road
improvements within available right'.of way. ' '
Area roads, need to be improved to address Safety and accommodate the increase in traffic
generated by this development. The 2001 traffic volumes along the section of Route 360
from Otterdale Road to Route 288 range from 15,000 to 61,000 .vehicles per day. The
volume of traffic from Woodlake Village Parkway to Route 288 exceeds the capacity of
the road, and drivers experience extreme congestion, especially during peak periods. The
Virginia Department of Transportation's Six-Year Improvement prO~ratn'includes a
project to widen Route 360 to six' (6) and eight (8) lanes from Swirl Creek to Winterpock
Road. The Plan designates previous funds for construction' of additional westbound lanes
on Route 360, and provides supplemental funding for the remainder of the project in the
fifth (FY08) and sixth (FY09) years of the Plan. No additional road improvement prOjects
9 04SN0133-FEB25-BOS
in this area of the County are included in the Six-Year Improvement Plan. The applicant
has proffered to contribute cash, in an amount consistent with the Board of Supervisors'
Policy, towards mitigating the traffic impact of this development. (Proffered Condition 2)
Financial Impact on Capital Facilities:
PER UNIT
Potential Number of New Dwelling Units 55* 1.00
Population. Increase 149.60 2.72
Number °fNeTM Students ·
Elementary 13.20 0.24
Middle 7.15 0. ! 3
High 9.35 0.17
TOTAL' 29.70 0.54
Net Cost for Schools ~ 266,585 .. 4,847
Net Cost for Parks ' 38,115 693
Net Cost for Libraries 20,625 . 375
Net Cost for Fire Stations 22,055 401
Average Net'Cost for Roads 225,995 4,109
TOTAL NET COST. 1573,375 . . 110,425
*Based on a proffered maximum, number of lots. Actual number, of lots and corresponding
impact may vary: (Proffered Condition 13)
As noted, this proposed development will have an impact on capital facilities. Staff' has
calculated the fiscal impact of every new dwelling Unit on schools, roads, parks, libraries and fire
stations at $10,425 per unit. The. applicant, has been adVised that a maximum proffer of $9,000
per unit would defray the cost of the capital facilities necessitated by this propOsed development.
Consistent with the Board 'of Supervisors' Policy, and proffers accepted from other applicants,
the applicant has ~effered cash to assist in defraying the cost of this proposed zoning on such
capital facilities. (Proffered Condition 2)
Note that circumstances relevant to this Case, as presented by the applicant, have been reviewed
and it has been determined that it is appropriate to acce' >t the maximum cash proffer in this case.
10 04SN0133-FEB25-BOS
LAND USE
Comprehensive Plan:
Lies within the boundaries of the Upper Swirl Creek Plan which suggests the northern
portion of the property, north of the future Hampton park Drive Extended,' is appropriate
for office and residential develOpment of up to. ten (10) units per acre, while the southern
portion of the property, south of the proposed Hampton Park DriVe Extended, is
appropriate for single family residential development of two (2) units per acre or less.
Area Development Trends:
Properties to the north are zoned Neighborhood Business (C-2), COmmunity Business (C-
3) and General Business (C-5) and are occupied by a single family dwelling or are
currently vacant. Properties to the south and west are zoned Agricultural (A)-and are
developed for single family uses or are currently vacant. Properties to the east are zoned
Agricultural (A) or Residential (R-9) and are currently vacant or pending subdivision plan
approval as part of the Hampton Park Subdivision development. It-iS anticipated 'that
residential zoning and land usepatterns will continue south of the future Hampton Park
Drive Extended consistent with densities suggested by the Plan, - .
Density~
A maximum of fifty-five (55) lOts on the property, yielding a density of approximately 1.9
units per acre, has been proffered. (Proffered Condition 13)
Dwelling Size and Architectural- Treatment:
Proffered conditions address minimum house size and 'foundation and exposed pier
treatment. (Proffered Conditions 11 and 12)
Limitations on Parcel Division:
As previously noted, with approval of this' request, property .north of the proposed
Hampton Park Drive Extended collector will remain zoned Agricultural (A) with a
Conditional Use Planned DeVelopment to permit-the construction of the Public Road-and
Hampton Park Drive Extended to serve the proposed residential development to the
south. With the extension-of these rights of way through .the subject property, the
potential exists for the property north of Hampton Park Drive-Extended, as well as any
residual Agriculturally-zoned property that may be located south' of the established
alignment of this road to be divided into parcels for-residential development that am
exempt fxom the subdivision review process. To address staff concerns relative to-.the
creation of individual parcels outside of the subdivision process which have access .to
these propOSed roads, Proffered'Condition 9 precludes the_subdivision of both property
north of:Hampton Park Drive Extended as well as anyof the subject ~Agricultural (A)
11 04SN0133-FEB25'Bos
property except for the establishment of these rights of way. Further, no residential
building permits .would be issued on such properties.
CONCLUSIONS
The proposed zoning and land uses conform to the Upper Swift Creek Plan-which suggests that
the northern portion of the property, north of the future Hampton Park Drive Extended, is
appropriate for office and residential development of up to ten (10) units per acre, while the
southern portion of the property, South of the proposed Hampton Park Drive Extended, is
apprOPriate for. single family residential development of two (2) units per acre or less.
In addition, the applicant has presented an overall access plan for the area to address
transportation concerns relative to the separation of access points along Hull Street Road.
Given these considerations, approval of this request is recommended.
CASE HISTORY
Planning Commission Meeting (11/18/03):
At the request of the applicant, the Commission deferred this case to their December 16,
2003, public heating.
Staff (11/19/03):
The applicant was advised in writing that any significant new or revised information
should be submitted no later, than November 24, 2003, for consideration at the
Commission's December public heating. Also, the applicant was advised.that a $500:00
deferral fee must be paid prior tothe CommissioWs public hearing.
Staff (11/26/03):
To date, no new information has-been submitted nor has the $500.00 deferral fee been
Paid.
Applicant (12/2/03):
The deferral fee was paid.
12
04SN0133-FEB25-BOS
Applicant (12/15/03 and 12/16/03):
Revised proffered conditions were submitted to address construction of mm lanes and
access to property to the east.
Planning Commission Meeting (12/16/03):
The applicant did not accept staff's recommendation, but accepted.the Commission's
recommendation. There was opposition present. Concerns were expressed relative .to the
relocation of the crossover on Route 360 and its affect on access for existing, and-
proposed area businesses.
In response to questions of Messrs. Stack and Cunningham, Mr. McCracken indicated
that crossovers must serve more than a single parcel and that the Transportation
Department could not support this request without the closure of the existing crossover.
Mr. Stack noted that with future growth along the western Route 360 corridor, the
crossover would eventually be closed, that proffered'conditions provide for an alternative
access to the adjacent eastern commercial development through the subject property;.'and'
that this will result in the adjacent commercial-development having two (2) accesses.
On motion of Mr. Stack, ' seconded by Mr. Cunningham, the Commission recommended
approval of this request and acceptance of the Proffered conditiOns-0n pages 2 through 4.
AYES: Unanimous.
Board of Supervisors Meeting (1/28/04):
The applicant did not accept staffs recommendation but accepted 'the commission's
recommendation.
There was opposition present. Concerns were expressed relative to .closure of. the
crossover on Route 360 that leads into an adjacent business to the east; separation of
access points along Route 360, acquisition of additional right .of way from adjacent
parcels to accommodate an additional lane of pavement to the east; the western extension.
of Hampton Park Drive; and the approval of additional residential development prior to
the adoPtion of the Upper Swift Creek Plan amendment.
Mrs. Humphrey noted that the residential component of the request was consistent with
the current Plan recommendations but that a deferral was appropriate for the. purpoSe of
staff, the applicant and adjacent property owners to seek resolution on access issues.
13 04 SN0133,FEB25 -B oS
On their own motion, the Board deferred this case to the February 25, 2004, meeting to
address access issues.
Staff (1/29/04):
The applicant was advised in writing that any Significant new or revised information
should be submitted no later than February 3, 2004, for consideration at the.'Board's
February public hearing.
Meeting with Area Property Owners, Applicant, Staff and Matoaca District SUpervisor (2/5/04):
A meeting was held to discuss issues relative to access and the crossover on Route 360.
The applicant agreed to proffer dedication of an access easement from the southern
boundary of the adjacent property to the east to ~the access easement referenced in
Proffered Condition 4 to facilitate vehicular circulation within this site.
Applicant (2/9/04):
Proffered Condition 13 was submitted which addresses an additional access easement to
the adjacent property to the east.
The Board of Supervisors, on Wednesday, February. 25, 2004, beginning at 7:00 p.m., will take
underconsideration this request.
14
04 SN0133-FEB2.5 -B OS
%
.%
%
/
/
00
0
o 4~$ N0133- ~