13SN0529
CASE NUMBER: 13SN0529(AMENDED)
APPLICANTS: Douglas and Susan Sowers
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY, VIRGINIA
CLOVER HILL DISTRICT
ADDENDUM II
Board of Supervisors Hearing:
JULY 26, 2017
Board of Supervisors Time Remaining:
365 DAYS
Applicants’ Agent:
JAMES W. THEOBALD (804-771-9513)
Applicants’ Contact:
DOUGLAS SOWERS
113 Acres – 2000 Old Hundred Road
(804-794-6836)
Planning Department Case Manager:
RYAN RAMSEY (804-768-7592)
REQUEST
(AMENDED) Amendment of zoning approval (Case 03SN0288) relative to cash proffers, and
transportation improvements and phasing in a Community Business (C-3) District. Specifically,
these amendments to Proffered Conditions 4, 8 and 9 would:
reduce cash payments;
modify standards for road improvements along Old Hundred and Otterdale Roads; and
phase construction of these transportation improvements in conjunction with initial
residential development.
Note:
A.Conditions may be imposed or the property owner may proffer conditions.
B.Revised Proffered Condition7is located in Attachment 1.
SUMMARY
A mixed use development to include commercial, office and various residential housing types
(Cottage Glen) is proposed. Existing zoning would permit a combined maximum of 740 dwelling
units (single family, townhouse and multifamily).
The current escalated cash proffer amount, exclusive of the first 17 dwelling units (723 units), is
$15,166 per dwelling unit, or $8,112 per age-restricted unit. The total potential value of the
applicant’s cash proffer equates to $10,965,018 based on $15,166 per dwelling unit. With this
request, the applicant is proposing to amend the cash proffer payment, specifically by providing
offsite road improvements and a variable, reduced cash proffer amount. The offsite road
improvements are valued at $2,979,010. Staff would be responsible to track the type and number
of units issued a Certificate of Occupancy.
Providing a FIRST CHOICE community through excellence in public service
SUMMARY (CONTINUED)
Once the value for those units reaches $2,979,010, then the applicant has proffered to pay the
following, per unit type: single-family, $9,400; townhouse, $5,922; apartment, $5,640; senior
housing (detached), $4,324; and senior housing (attached), $2,914. Further analysis on the
improvements may be found in the Transportation section of this report.
Amendments to Proffered Conditions 8 and 9 would modify standards for the proposed road
improvements along Old Hundred and Otterdale Roads and provide for theseoff-site
improvements in conjunction with initial residential development.
Conditions proffered with this case provide design and architectural standards (summarized on
pages 5 and 6) that are comparable in quality to that of the surrounding community.
ADDENDUM
The purpose of this Addendum is to provide the Board with a revised Proffered Condition 7.f,
which was submitted by the applicants on July26, 2017. The proffer provides a limitation on the
number of three bedroom apartmentspermitted in the development.
On July 26, 2017, the applicants submitted an additional proffered condition. Specifically, the
applicants offered Proffered Condition 7.f. to require that no more than 20% of the apartments
contain three bedrooms. Staff continues to recommend approval of this request for reasons
noted in the “Staff’s Analysis and Recommendation”.
213SN0529-2017JUL26-BOS-ADD2
CASE HISTORY
Applicant Submittals
4/9/13 Application submitted
10/4/16 Revised proffered conditions were submitted
10/5/16 Revised application submitted
10/31/16 Revised application submitted
12/16/16 & Revised proffered conditions were submitted
2/2/17
2/2/17 Revised application submitted
4/25/17, Revised proffered conditions were submitted
5/17, 6/7,
6/12, 6/20
& 7/26/17
Community Meetings
7/22/13Issues Discussed:
Planned road improvements for development
Location of water and sewer line extensions
Entrance locations to development
Size and design of homes planned for development
Impact of deleting cash proffers on adjoining home values
1/4/16 Applicant advised of requested deferral to March Planning Commission
meeting.
Issues Discussed:
Future area road improvements along Otterdale, Genito and Old
Hundred Roads, and Powhite Parkway Extension
Uses permitted under current zoning
Impacts of residential development on area schools
Planning Commission
1/17/17Action –DEFERRED TO MARCH 21, 2017 AT THE APPLICANT’S REQUEST
3/21/17Action – DEFERRED TO MAY 16, 2017 ON THE COMMISSION’S OWN MOTION
WITH THE APPLICANTS’ CONSENT
5/16/17Action –DEFERRED TO JUNE 20, 2017 ON THE COMMISSION’S OWN MOTION
WITH THE APPLICANTS’ CONSENT
313SN0529-2017JUL26-BOS-ADD2
ATTACHMENT 1
PROFFERED CONDITION
July 26, 2017
7.Development Standardsfor Multifamily Buildings. Development of the Property for
multi-family uses where Multi-Family (R-MF) uses are permitted shall be subject to the
following development standards.
a.Roof materials shall be 30 year architectural/dimensional asphalt composition
shingle.
b.Primary exterior wall materials (exclusive of windows, dormers, gables, doors,
trim, soffit and fascia) shall be brick, stone, cultured stone, stone veneer, fiber
cement siding, engineered wood, vinyl (a minimum of .042” nominal thickness as
evidenced by manufacturer’s printed literature) horizontal lap siding, or a
combination of the forgoing. Both vinyl and cedar shake siding are allowed.A
minimum of twenty percent (20%), in the aggregate, of the front elevation of
each building, excluding windows, doors, breezeways and architectural design
features, shall be of brick, stone or masonry construction.
Additional siding requirements:
i.A variety of facing materials shall be used on the front façade of
any building. A minimum of two facing materials shall be used on
any the front façade of any building.
ii.Buildings with the same color palette, percentages of siding
materials, and landscaping on the front elevation shall not be
permitted side-by-side to create diversity and interest along the
streetscapes.
c.Foundation planting beds shall be required along the entire front façade of
buildings which face public streets, excluding access to porches, patios, and
garages, and shall contain a minimum of fifty (50) percent evergreen material
and have one shrub per three linear feet of foundation planting bed.
d.Street trees shall be planted along each side of the street no more than forty
(40) feet apart, to include entrance roads from public roads into the
development. If existing trees are maintained, and are located along the sides of
the streets, they may be counted toward this requirement.
e.Sidewalks shall be provided on both sides of the streets. The treatment and
location of these sidewalks shall be approved by the Planning Department at the
time of site plan review.
f.The total number of any three bedroom apartment units shall not exceed twenty
percent (20%) of the total number of apartment units.(P)
413SN0529-2017JUL26-BOS-ADD2
CASE NUMBER: 13SN0529(AMENDED)
APPLICANTS: Douglas and Susan Sowers
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY, VIRGINIA
CLOVER HILL DISTRICT
ADDENDUM
Board of Supervisors Hearing:
JULY 26, 2017
Board of Supervisors Time Remaining:
365 DAYS
Applicants’ Agent:
JAMES W. THEOBALD (804-771-9513)
Applicants’ Contact:
DOUGLAS SOWERS
113 Acres – 2000 Old Hundred Road
(804-794-6836)
Planning Department Case Manager:
RYAN RAMSEY (804-768-7592)
REQUEST
(AMENDED) Amendment of zoning approval (Case 03SN0288) relative to cash proffers, and
transportation improvements and phasing in a Community Business (C-3) District. Specifically,
these amendments to Proffered Conditions 4, 8 and 9 would:
reduce cash payments;
modify standards for road improvements along Old Hundred and Otterdale Roads; and
phase construction of these transportation improvements in conjunction with initial
residential development.
Note:
A.Conditions may be imposed or the property owner may proffer conditions.
B.Proffered Condition8is located in Attachment 1.
SUMMARY
A mixed use development to include commercial, office and various residential housing types
(Cottage Glen) is proposed. Existing zoning would permit a combined maximum of 740 dwelling
units (single family, townhouse and multifamily).
The current escalated cash proffer amount, exclusive of the first 17 dwelling units (723 units), is
$15,166 per dwelling unit, or $8,112 per age-restricted unit. The total potential value of the
applicant’s cash proffer equates to $10,965,018 based on $15,166 per dwelling unit. With this
request, the applicant is proposing to amend the cash proffer payment, specifically by providing
offsite road improvements and a variable, reduced cash proffer amount. The offsite road
improvements are valued at $2,979,010. Staff would be responsible to track the type and number
of units issued a Certificate of Occupancy.
Providing a FIRST CHOICE community through excellence in public service
SUMMARY (CONTINUED)
Once the value for those units reaches $2,979,010, then the applicant has proffered to pay the
following, per unit type: single-family, $9,400; townhouse, $5,922; apartment, $5,640; senior
housing (detached), $4,324; and senior housing (attached), $2,914. Further analysis on the
improvements may be found in the Transportation section of this report.
Amendments to Proffered Conditions 8 and 9 would modify standards for the proposed road
improvements along Old Hundred and Otterdale Roads and provide for theseoff-site
improvements in conjunction with initial residential development.
Conditions proffered with this case provide design and architectural standards (summarized on
pages 5 and 6) that are comparable in quality to that of the surrounding community.
ADDENDUM
The purpose of this Addendum is to provide the Boardwith Proffered Condition8, which was
submitted by the applicant and considered by the Commission on June 20, 2017. The proffer
and updated Utilities section were inadvertentlyomitted from the Board’s “Staff’s Analysis and
Recommendation”.
The Commission’s recommendation of approval included Proffered Condition 8, which was
introduced through an addendum to the Commission’s“Staff’s Analysis and Recommendation”.
Both Proffered Condition 8 and the updated Utilities section were inadvertently omitted in the
compilation of the Board’s “Staff’s Analysis and Recommendation” and are now included for the
Board’s consideration.
UTILITIES
Staff Contact: Jamie Bland (804-751-4439) blandj@chesterfield.gov
Additional Utility Comments
A sixteen (16) inch water main is identified in the facilities plan to run along Old Hundred Road,
north of the subject property. It is the policy of the Utilities Department to require water mains to
be installed in easements along roads that are planned for future widening. The applicant has
submitted a conceptual R.O.W. dedicated plat. The applicants are reminded of the policy to
provide two (2) water feeds to residential developments with more than twenty-five (25) lots.
The applicants are reminded of the policy to make sewer available to existing lots without sewer
service whenever possible by the use of easement dedication or extensions during construction
plan review.
Applicants have proffered a water line easement on Old Hundred Road. (Proffered Condition 8)
213SN0529-2017JUL26-BOS-ADD
ATTACHMENT 1
PROFFERED CONDITION
June 20, 2017
Note: Both the Planning Commission and Staff recommend acceptance of the following
proffered condition, as offered by the applicant.
8.Water Line Easement. A waterline easement shall be granted along the right-of-way of
Old Hundred Road as mutually agreeable to the applicant and Utility Department. Such
easement shall be dedicated to the County at the time the property is developed or
when requested by the County, whichever occurs first. The County will prepare the
standard easement documentation and the applicant shall provide the necessary plat.
(U)
313SN0529-2017JUL26-BOS-ADD
CASE NUMBER: 13SN0529(AMENDED)
APPLICANTS: Douglas and Susan Sowers
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY, VIRGINIA
CLOVER HILLDISTRICT
STAFF’S ANALYSIS
AND RECOMMENDATION
Board of Supervisors Hearing:
JULY 26, 2017
Board of Supervisors Time Remaining:
365 DAYS
Applicants’ Agent:
JAMES W. THEOBALD (804-771-9513)
Applicants’ Contact:
DOUGLAS SOWERS
113 Acres – 2000 Old Hundred Road
(804-794-6836)
Planning Department Case Manager:
RYAN RAMSEY (804-768-7592)
REQUEST
(AMENDED) Amendment of zoning approval (Case 03SN0288) relative to cash proffers, and
transportation improvements and phasing in a Community Business (C-3) District. Specifically,
these amendments to Proffered Conditions 4, 8 and 9 would:
reduce cash payments;
modify standards for road improvements along Old Hundred and Otterdale Roads; and
phase construction of these transportation improvements in conjunction with initial
residential development.
Note:
A.Conditions may be imposed or the property owner may proffer conditions.
B.Proffered conditions,conceptual elevations, a garage projectionexhibit and approved conditionsand
exhibits are located in Attachments 1 -6.
SUMMARY
A mixed use development to include commercial, office and various residential housing types
(Cottage Glen) is proposed. Existing zoning would permit a combined maximum of 740 dwelling
units (single family, townhouse and multifamily).
The current escalated cash proffer amount, exclusive of the first 17 dwelling units (723 units), is
$15,166 per dwelling unit, or $8,112 per age-restricted unit. The total potential value of the
applicant’s cash proffer equates to $10,965,018 based on $15,166 per dwelling unit. With this
request, the applicant is proposing to amend the cash proffer payment, specifically by providing
offsite road improvements and a variable, reduced cash proffer amount. The offsite road
improvements are valued at $2,979,010. Staff would be responsible to track the type and number
of units issued a Certificate of Occupancy.
Providing a FIRST CHOICE community through excellence in public service
SUMMARY (CONTINUED)
Once the value for those units reaches $2,979,010, then the applicant has proffered to pay the
following, per unit type: single-family, $9,400; townhouse, $5,922; apartment, $5,640; senior
housing (detached), $4,324; and senior housing (attached), $2,914. Further analysis on the
improvements may be found in the Transportation section of this report.
Amendments to Proffered Conditions 8 and 9 would modify standards for the proposed road
improvements along Old Hundred and Otterdale Roads and provide for theseoff-site
improvements in conjunction with initial residential development.
Conditions proffered with this case provide design and architectural standards (summarized on
pages 5 and 6) that are comparable in quality to that of the surrounding community.
RECOMMENDATIONS
APPROVAL
PLANNING
COMMISSION
AYES: Sloan, Freye, Jones and Wallin ABSTENTION: Jackson
PLANNING AND TRANSPORTATION – APPROVAL
The quality, design and architecture offered by the applicants in this
case provide for a convenient, attractive and harmonious community
STAFF
comparable to the surrounding community.
The development’s traffic impact will be addressed by providing road
improvements and cash payments.
SUMMARY OF IDENTIFIED ISSUES
DepartmentIssue
The Public Facilities Plan suggests:
new middle school in the vicinity of Hull Street and Otterdale
Roads;
SCHOOLS
new high school in the vicinity of Genito and Otterdale Roads.
At this time a budget has not been developed for the acquisition of land or
construction of these school facilities as recommended in the Plan.
The Public Facilities Plan suggests the Midlothian Library should be
expanded/replaced or a new facility shall be constructed in the general
LIBRARIES
vicinity at or near current site. Land for expansion or replacement of this
facility has not been acquired.
213SN0529-2017JUL26-BOS-RPT
313SN0529-2017JUL26-BOS-RPT
Comprehensive Plan
Classification: COMMUNITY MIXED USE & SUBURBAN RESIDENTIAL I
The designation suggests the property is appropriate for mixed use with an integrated mixture
of concentrated commercial and higher density residential uses with public spaces as well as
suburban residential use with a maximum of 2.0 dwellings per acre.
Surrounding Land Uses and Development
Single-family Uses
Old Hundred Road
Otterdale Road
Vacant
Single-family Uses
(New Market Subdivision)
Woolridge Road
413SN0529-2017JUL26-BOS-RPT
PLANNING
Staff Contact: Ryan Ramsey (804-768-7592) ramseyrp@chesterfield.gov
Zoning History
Case Number Request
Rezoning to Community Business(C-3) with Conditional Useand Conditional Use
Planned Development to permit a mix of residential (single family, townhouse
and multifamily), office and commercial uses based upon adevelopment master
plan.
03SN0288
Proffered Conditions included a cash proffer of $9,000 per dwelling unit
Approved
(escalated to $15,166). For any senior housing units, $4,815 per unit
(5/2004)
(escalated to $8,112).
The staff report for this case analyzed the impact of the proposed
development on public facilities and the applicant’s offer to mitigate that
impact.
Design Requirements of Case 03SN0288
Other than a density limitation, there are no existing standards for single family, townhouse and
multifamily development other than as required by ordinance.
Design
High quality residential development addresses the Comprehensive Plan goals for strong and
sustainable neighborhoods that are visually attractive, well-planned and well-maintained.
Further, the purpose and intent of the zoning ordinance to promote the health, safety,
convenience and general welfare of the public includes the creation of convenient, attractive
and harmonious communities, protection against overcrowding of land, and protection of the
natural environment. As such, developments that promote unique, viable and longlasting
places and enhance the community are encouraged.
The following provides an overview of design requirements offered as part of this request
(Attachment 1 – Proffered Conditions):
Single Family
Architectural style compatible with Newmarket subdivision
o
Variety of elevations along a street to avoid monotonous streetscape
o
Façade, foundation, roof and porch treatment
o
Driveway and front walk treatment
o
Light posts and mailbox treatments
o
Sodded and irrigated front and side yards
o
Foundation plantings
o
Screening of utility units (HVAC, generators, etc.)
o
Garages extending beyond front of dwellings consistent with Exhibit B; door
o
treatment
513SN0529-2017JUL26-BOS-RPT
Townhouse
Variety of siding materials, with minimum of two used on front facades
o
Variation in color, siding and landscaping on side-by-side units
o
Foundation and roof treatment
o
Driveway and front walk treatment
o
Sodded and irrigated front and side yards
o
Foundation plantings
o
Sidewalks and street trees
o
Screening of utility units (HVAC, generators, etc.)
o
Front-loaded garages at or behind front of dwellings; door treatment
o
Multifamily
Façade and roof treatment
o
Variety of sidingmaterials, with minimum of two used on front building façades
o
Variation in color, siding and landscaping on side-by-side buildings
o
Foundation plantings, street trees and sidewalks
o
As suggested by the Comprehensive Plan goals and the Zoning Ordinance, the proffered
conditions of this request include quality design and architectural elements that are
comparable to that ofthe surrounding community.
BUDGET & MANAGEMENT
Staff Contact: Natalie Spillman (804-318-8767) spillmann@chesterfield.gov
County finance staff is responsible for managing the finances of the County and making
recommendations to the County Administrator regarding the allocation of available resources
for the provision of services and capital facilities to serve the citizens of the County. Finance
staff will advise the County Administrator if changed economic circumstances require
adjustments to the County’s budget or capital improvement program.
COUNTY TRANSPORTATION
Staff Contact: Jim Banks (804-748-1037) banksj@chesterfield.gov
The applicant proffered to develop a maximum of 85 single-family units, 430 apartment units,
40,000 square feet of general office, and 250,000 square feet of shopping center; or equivalent
development (Proffered Condition 4). The proposed development could generate
approximately 16,607 average daily trips.Traffic generated by development of the property
would be initially distributed to Old Hundred Road and Otterdale Road.
613SN0529-2017JUL26-BOS-RPT
Old Hundred Road is a major arterial with a recommended right of way width of 90 feet, as
identified on the County’s Thoroughfare Plan. Old Hundred Road is currently two-lanes wide.
Sections of the road are substandard, with approximately 10-foot lane widths and no usable
shoulders. VDOT minimum geometric design standards recommend this road have 12-foot lane
widths and 10 foot shoulders. In 2015, the traffic count on Old Hundred Road east of Otterdale
Road was 5,055 (Level of Service “D”).
Otterdale Road is also identified on the County’s Thoroughfare Plan as a major arterial with a
recommended right of way width of 90 feet. Otterdale Road is a two-lane road. Sections of the
road are substandard, with approximately 10-foot lane widths and no usable shoulders. VDOT
minimum geometric design standards recommend this road have 12-foot lane widths and 10
foot shoulders. In 2015, the traffic count on Otterdale Road south of Old Hundred Road was
2,630 (Level of Service “C”).
Section 19.1-231of the County Code outlines the general requirements to meet the needsof
the traffic generated by a proposed development, including acceptable levels of service. This
proposed residential development would contribute to an identifiable need for transportation
improvements. The applicant has offered the following (note: many of these conditions are
currently required by Case 03SN0288):
Road Improvements (Proffered Condition 2)
4-lane divided Woolridge Road Extended from Old Hundred through the Site Road
intersection.
Dual left turn lanes, if warranted, along Woolridge Road Extended at the Site Road
intersection.
Widening/improving Old Hundred Road to a twelve (12) foot wide travel lane, measured
from the centerline of the existing pavement, with an additional four (4) foot wide paved
shoulder plus a four (4) foot wide unpaved shoulder and overlaying the full width of Old
Hundred Road for the entire property frontage.
Construction of left and right turn lanes at each approved access along the Site Road, along
Old Hundred Road, along Otterdale Road, and along Woolridge Road Extended, including
the Old Hundred Road/Woolridge Road Extended intersection.
Full cost of traffic signalization at each approved access including at the Site Road/Old
Hundred Road, Site Road/Woolridge Road Extended, and Old Hundred Road/Woolridge
Road Extended intersections.
Widening/improving Otterdale Road to a twelve (12) foot wide travel lane, measured from
the centerline of the existing pavement, with an additional four (4) foot wide paved
shoulder plus a four (4) foot wide unpaved shoulder and overlaying the full width of
Otterdale Road for the entire property frontage.
713SN0529-2017JUL26-BOS-RPT
The property is located within Traffic Shed 5, which encompasses the area of the County west
of Courthouse Road, north of Hull Street, and south of the Powhite Parkway. Several roads in
this traffic shed or which serve this traffic shed are substandard, with little or no shoulders,
fixed objects (trees) adjacent to the edge of the pavement, and poor vertical and horizontal
alignments. The traffic volume generated from this proposed residential development will
contribute to an identifiable need for transportation facility improvements to these roads in
excess of existing transportation facility capacity. Roads in this shed or which serve this shed
need to be improved or widened to address safety and accommodate increased traffic,
including the increased traffic from the proposed development.
An applicant may choose to address the development’s impact on the county’s road
transportation network through dedication of property, construction of road improvements, or
a cash proffer. If an applicant elects to offer cash to address the impact on the county’s road
transportation network, Transportation staff has calculated the average impact of a single-
family dwelling unit on the transportation network to be $12,652; however, the Board of
Supervisors has adopted a policy establishing that it would accept a maximum cash proffer of
$9,400 per dwelling unit as addressing the traffic impacts of residential development, with all of
the funds to be dedicated towards improvements to the road network. The Policy allows the
county to consider mitigating circumstances about a proposed development. In this case, the
residential development is not limited to a specific type. Based on the volume of traffic it
generates:
A single-family unit traffic impact could be addressed by $9,400 per unit.
A townhouse unit, which generates 63% of the traffic of single-family dwelling unit, traffic
impact could be addressed by $5,922per unit.
An apartment unit, which generates 60% of the traffic of single-family dwelling unit, traffic
impact could be addressed by $5,640 per unit.
A senior housing-detached unit, which generates 46% of the traffic of single-family dwelling
unit, traffic impact could be addressed by $4,324 per unit.
A senior housing-attached unit, which generates 31% of the traffic of single-family dwelling
unit, traffic impact could be addressed by $2,914 per unit.
The Road Cash Proffer Policy states: “Consideration can be given to improvements that have
been constructed within five years as part of an overall development, prior to the traffic impact
of the entire development being present.” The applicant recently completed 2 lanes of
Woolridge Road Extended adjacent to the property frontage. As noted above, the applicant has
proffered to widen/improve Old Hundred Road for the property frontage and widen/improve
Otterdale Road for the property frontage (Proffered Conditions 2c. and f.). All 3 of these items
have been estimated to be valued at approximately $2,979,010, and have been completed or
are proffered to be completed in conjunction with initial residential development (Proffered
Condition 3). It should be noted, however, that the actual cost to provide these improvements
could be more or less than this amount.
The applicant has proffered to make payments for any residential unit beyond the total number
of units that would result in an impact of $2,979,010 (Proffered Condition 1). Staff supports the
request.
813SN0529-2017JUL26-BOS-RPT
VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Staff Contact: Jonathan Phillippe(804-674-2560) jonathan.phillippe@vdot.virginia.gov
VDOT Land Use Regulations
Subdivision Street All internal development roadways anticipated for State acceptance will be
Acceptance evaluated against the current Subdivision Street Acceptance standards at
(24VAC30-91/92) the time of site plan submittal. (Case 03SN0288, Proffer 12)
Summary VDOT has no comment on the proposed deletion/amendment of the
noted transportation proffers under Case 03SN0288.
Construction of the remaining transportation proffers is subject to
compliance with Department standards. VDOT will verify compliance,
including the evaluation of signal warrants, turn lane capacity analysis,
and the location of the proffered access points through the County site
plan review process. (Case 03SN0288, Proffers 8 and 10)
FIRE AND EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES
Staff Contact: Anthony Batten (804-717-6167) battena@chesterfield.gov
Mission
The mission of Fire and Emergency Medical Services (EMS) is to protect life, property and the
environment through a comprehensive fire and life safety program that ensures an adequate
and timely response to emergencies.
Response Times
The proposed development is located in the rural response zone for which Fire & EMS has a
goal of responding to at least 90% of the calls for service in under twelve (12) minutes. Fire and
EMS is currently unable to meet that goal.
Nearby Fire/EMS Facilities
Airport Fire Station, Company Number 15
Anticipated Fire & EMS Impacts/Needs
Based on an average of 0.17 calls per dwelling, it is estimated that this development will
generate 130annual calls for Fire/EMS services.
Additional Fire and EMS Comments
When the property is developed, the number of hydrants, quantity of water needed for fire
protection, and access requirements will be evaluated during the plans review process.
913SN0529-2017JUL26-BOS-RPT
SCHOOLS
Staff Contact: Atonja Allen (804-318-8740) atonja_allen@ccpsnet.net
Mission
High performing, high quality public schools contribute to the quality of life and economic
vitality of the County. The comprehensive plan suggests a greater focus should be placed on
linking schools with communities by providing greater access, flexible designs and locations that
better meet the needs of the communities in which they are located.
Capital Improvements
The School Board FY2017 adopted Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) continues to support the
2013 voter approved school revitalization program that will replace or renovate ten schools and
construct one new elementary school to add capacity in the Midlothian area of the county. The
ten existing facilities that are part of the revitalization program are Providence Middle School,
Monacan High School, Manchester Middle School, Beulah Elementary School, Enon Elementary
School, Matoaca Elementary School, Harrowgate Elementary School, Reams Elementary School,
Crestwood Elementary School, and Ettrick Elementary School. The project at Providence
Middle School is currently in construction, a new Manchester Middle School is planned for
construction on the existing school site,and the project at Monacan High School is complete.
Additional information on the CIP can be found in the financial section of the CCPS Adopted
Budget for FY2017.
Anticipated School Impacts
Enrollment
Anticipated Percent of
Schools Currently Functional Number of Current
Student Yield by Total
Serving Area Capacity Trailers Enrollment
School Type Functional
Capacity
Elementary 129Evergreen 1126 4 1083 96
Middle 62 Tomahawk Creek1301 5 1505 116
High 71 Midlothian 1957 0 1544 79
Total \[1\] 262
Note:
Based upon average number of students per single family dwelling unit countywide at 0.48 students per unit, and per
\[1\]
average number of students per multifamily unit countywide at 0.33 students per unit.
Public Facilities Plan
The Public Facilities Plan recommends a new elementary school be located in the vicinity of Old
Hundred and Otterdale Roads, north of Genito Road and south of Midlothian Turnpike. In
October 2016 the Board of Supervisors approved Case 17PD0105 for substantial accord to
permit an elementary school located at 1501 Old Hundred Road, and the school division has
acquired this property. Post 2020, the Plan also recommends a new high school in the vicinity
of Genito and Otterdale Roads northwest of Swift Creek Reservoir, however at this time a
1013SN0529-2017JUL26-BOS-RPT
budget has not been developed for the acquisition of land or construction of this school facility
as recommended in the Plan.
Additional Schools Comments
Case 13SN0529 permits 740 dwelling units, to include 70 single family units, and an unspecified
mix of townhouse, and multifamily dwelling units. Per the original zoning case, a maximum of
670 multifamily units may be permitted. Student yield calculations are based on 70 single
family units, and 670 multifamily units.
LIBRARIES
Staff Contact: Jennifer Stevens (804-751-4998) stevensj@chesterfield.gov
Mission
The public library system’s role in the county has expanded beyond its traditional function as a
resource for information and materials, and now serves as a community gathering place for
educational, cultural and informational services; community support during emergencies;
economic development; and revitalization activities.
Nearby Library
Midlothian Library
Public Facilities Plan
The Public Facilities Plan suggests the Midlothian Library should be expanded/replaced or a
new facility shall be constructed in the general vicinity at or near current site. Land for
expansion or replacement of this facility has not been acquired.
PARKS AND RECREATION
Staff Contact: Stuart Connock (804-751-4484) ConnockS@chesterfield.gov
To date, no comments have been received.
UTILITIES
Staff Contact: Jamie Bland (804-751-4439) blandj@chesterfield.gov
ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING
Staff Contact: Rebeccah Ward (804-748-1028) WardR@chesterfield.gov
This request will not impact these facilities.
1113SN0529-2017JUL26-BOS-RPT
CASE HISTORY
Applicant Submittals
4/9/13 Application submitted
10/4/16 Revised proffered conditions were submitted
10/5/16 Revised application submitted
10/31/16 Revised application submitted
12/16/16 & Revised proffered conditions were submitted
2/2/17
2/2/17 Revised application submitted
4/25/17, Revised proffered conditions were submitted
5/17, 6/7 &
6/12/17
Community Meetings
7/22/13Issues Discussed:
Planned road improvements for development
Location of water and sewer line extensions
Entrance locations to development
Size and design of homes planned for development
Impact of deleting cash proffers on adjoining home values
1/4/16 Applicant advised of requested deferral to March Planning Commission
meeting.
Issues Discussed:
Future area road improvements along Otterdale, Genito and Old
Hundred Roads, and Powhite Parkway Extension
Uses permitted under current zoning
Impacts of residential development on area schools
1213SN0529-2017JUL26-BOS-RPT
Planning Commission
1/17/17Action –DEFERRED TO MARCH 21, 2017 AT THE APPLICANT’S REQUEST
3/21/17Action – DEFERRED TO MAY 16, 2017 ON THE COMMISSION’S OWN MOTION
WITH THE APPLICANTS’ CONSENT
5/16/17Action –DEFERRED TO JUNE 20, 2017 ON THE COMMISSION’S OWN MOTION
WITH THE APPLICANTS’ CONSENT
6/20/2017Citizen Comments:
No citizens spoke to this request.
Commission Discussion:
Mr. Jackson advised the Commission that he would abstain from voting on this
case, noting his continued discussions with the County Administration relative
to information provided in the staff report.
Recommendation –APPROVAL AND ACCEPTANCE OF THE PROFFERED
CONDITIONSIN ATTACHMENT 1
Motion: Freye Second: Wallin
AYES: Sloan, Freye,Jonesand Wallin
ABSTENTION: Jackson
The Board of Supervisors on Wednesday, July 26, 2017, beginning at 6:00 p.m., will consider
this request.
1313SN0529-2017JUL26-BOS-RPT
ATTACHMENT 1
PROFFERED CONDITIONS
June 12, 2017
Note: Both the Planning Commission and Staff recommend acceptance ofthe following
proffered conditions, as offered by the applicant.
The property owners and applicant in this rezoning case, pursuant to Section 15.2-2298 of the
Code of Virginia (1950 as amended) and the Zoning Ordinance of Chesterfield County, for
themselves and their successors or assigns, proffer that the property under consideration (the
“Property”) will be developed according to the following proffers if, and only if, the rezoning
request submitted herewith is granted with only those conditions agreed to by the owners and
applicant. In the event this request is denied or approved with conditions not agreed to by the
owners and applicant, the proffers shall immediately be null and void and of no further force or
effect.
The Applicant amends Proffered Condition 4 of Case No. 03SN0288 to read as follows:
1.Road Cash Proffer. For each dwelling unit the applicant shall pay a cash proffer to the
County of Chesterfield for road improvements within the service district for the
property. Each payment shall be made prior to the issuance of a certificate of
occupancy for a dwelling unit, unless state law modifies the timing of the payment. The
amount of the cash proffer payments for each unit shall be as follows: single-family,
$9,400; townhouse, $5,922; apartment, $5,640; senior housing (detached), $4,324; and
senior housing (attached), $2,914 (the “Road Cash Proffer Payment”). Once units have
been approved for payments that would exceed a cumulative total of $2,979,010, the
applicant shall begin making the Road Cash Proffer Payment for any additional unit(s).
(B and M)
The Applicant amends Proffered Condition 8.b.i. of Case No. 03SN0288 to read as follows:
2.Construction. In order to provide an adequate roadway system, the applicant or his
assignee shall be responsible for the following road improvements:
a. Construction of a four (4) lane divided facility for Woolridge Road Extended, to
VDOT Urban Minor Arterial standards (50 MPH) with modifications approved by
CDOT, from Old Hundred through the Site Road intersection. The exact length of
this improvement shall be approved by CDOT;
b. Construction of additional pavement along Woolridge Road Extended at the Site
Road to provide dual left turn lanes, if warranted as determined by CDOT. The
exact length of this improvement shall be approved by CDOT;
c. Widening/improving the south side of Old Hundred Road to a twelve (12) foot
wide travel lane, measured from the centerline of the existing pavement, with an
additional four (4) foot wide paved shoulder plus a four (4) foot wide unpaved
shoulder and overlaying the full width of Old Hundred Road with one and one-
1413SN0529-2017JUL26-BOS-RPT
half (1.5) inches of compacted bituminous asphalt concrete, with modifications
approved by the Transportation Department, for the entire property frontage;
d. Construction of left and right turn lanes at each approved access to the Property
along the Site Road, along Old Hundred Road, along Otterdale Road, and along
Woolridge Road Extended, including the Old Hundred Road/Woolridge Road
Extended intersection, as determined by CDOT;
e. Full cost of traffic signalization at each approved access including at the Site
Road/Old Hundred Road, Site Road/Woolridge Road Extended, and Old Hundred
Road/Woolridge Road Extended intersections, if warranted as determined by
CDOT:
f. Widening/improving the east side of Otterdale Road to a twelve (12) foot wide
travel lane, measured from the centerline of the existing pavement, with an
additional four (4) foot wide paved shoulder plus a four (4) foot wide unpaved
shoulder and overlaying the full width of Otterdale Road with one and one-half
(1.5) inches of compacted bituminous asphalt concrete, with modifications
approved by the Transportation Department, for the entire property frontage;
g. Any rights of way necessary for improvements specified in Proffered Condition 2.
In the event the developer is unable to acquire the right of way necessary for
these road improvements, the applicant or his assignee may request, in writing,
the County to acquire such right of way as a public road improvement. All costs
associated with the acquisition of such right of way shall be borne by the
applicant or his assignee. (T)
The Applicant amends Proffered Condition 9 of Case No. 03SN0288 to read as follows:
3.Phasing Plan. Prior to recordation of the initial subdivision plat or prior to any site plan
approval, whichever occurs first, a phasing plan for the required road improvements, as
identified in Proffered Condition 2, shall be submitted to and approved by the
Transportation Department. The approved phasing plan shall require that in
conjunction with the initial residential development, the road improvements described
in Proffered Conditions 2.c. and 2.f. shall be provided. The approved phasing plan shall
also require that prior to issuance of an occupancy permit for any non-residential use,
the road improvement described in Proffered Condition 2.a. shall be provided.(T)
New Proffered Condition 4 is hereby provided:
4.Maximum Development. The maximum development shall be 85 single-family units,
430 apartment units, 40,000 square feet of general office, and 250,000 square feet of
shopping center; or equivalent development as determined by the Transportation
Department.(T)
1513SN0529-2017JUL26-BOS-RPT
New Proffered Condition 5 is hereby provided:
5.Development Standards for Residential Townhouses. Development of the RTH portion
of the Property for townhomes where Townhouse Residential (R-TH) uses are permitted
shall be in general conformance with the architectural appearance shown on the eight
elevations attached hereto as Exhibit A.
a.Roof materials shall be 30 year architectural/dimensional asphalt composition
shingle.
b. There shall be a minimum vertical height of eighteen (18) inches of brick, stone
or stone veneer above grade utilized on slab-on-grade foundations on all front
and side elevations to present the appearance of a crawl space.
c.Primary exterior wall materials (exclusive of windows, dormers, gables, doors,
trim, soffit and fascia) shall be brick, stone, cultured stone, stone veneer, fiber
cement siding, engineered wood, vinyl (a minimum of .042” nominal thickness as
evidenced by manufacturer’s printed literature) horizontal lap siding, or a
combination of the forgoing. Both vinyl and cedar shake siding are allowed.
Additional siding requirements:
i. A variety of facing materials shall be used on the front façade of
any building. A minimum of two facing materials shall be used on
the front façade of any unit.
ii. Buildings with the same color palette, percentages of siding
materials, and landscaping on the front elevation shall not be
permitted side-by-side to create diversity and interest along the
streetscapes.
d. Concrete or asphalt driveways shall be required. This may include pavers as well
as stamped concrete driveways. Gravel driveways shall not be permitted.
e. Sod and irrigation shall be required for front and side yards of all buildings of
attached townhome units, except where such yards have been improved with
hardscape, planting beds or other portions of the yard where grass is not grown.
f. Any front-loaded garages shall not extend beyond the front plane of the house.
The visual impacts of garage doors on dwellings facing streets shall be minimized
through the use of architectural fenestration and/or orientation. Flat panel
garage doors shall be prohibited.
g. A minimum of a three (3) foot wide concrete front walk shall be provided to the
front entrance of each dwelling unit, to connect to drives, sidewalks or street.
1613SN0529-2017JUL26-BOS-RPT
h. Heating, Ventilation and Air Conditioning (HVAC) Units and Any Whole House
Generators. Units shall initially be screened from view of public roads by
landscaping or low maintenance material, as approved by the Planning
Department.
i.Street trees shall be planted along each side of streets at no more than forty (40)
feet apart, to include entrance roads from public roads into the development. If
existing trees are maintained, and are located along the sides of the streets, they
may be counted toward this requirement.
j. Sidewalks shall be provided on both sides of the streets. The treatment and
location of these sidewalks shall be approved by the Planning Department at the
time of site plan review.
k. Foundation planting beds shall be required along the entire front façade of
buildings which face streets, excluding access to porches, patios, and garages,
and shall contain a minimum of fifty (50) percent evergreen material and have
one shrub per three linear feet of foundation planting bed. (P)
New Proffered Condition 6 is hereby provided:
6.Development Standards for Detached Single-Family Dwellings. All detached single-
family dwellings developed on the Property shall be subject to the following
development standards.
a. Style and Form.
i.The architectural styles shall use forms and elements compatible with
those in the Newmarket subdivision in Chesterfield County, Virginia. The
same architectural style of dwelling unit frontal elevations shall not be
located on either side of or directly across from each other, but this
requirement shall not prevent a dwelling unit from having the same
frontal elevations as a dwelling unit located diagonally across from said
dwelling unit.
ii.The main body of each single family detached dwelling unit shall be a
minimum of thirty (30) feet in width. No single story home shall be
located on either side of or directly across from another single story
home, but this requirement shall not prevent a single story home from
being located diagonally across from another single story home.
1713SN0529-2017JUL26-BOS-RPT
b. Exterior Facades.
i.Façade Materials. At least 50% (5 in 10) dwelling units constructed shall
have brick, stone or masonry fronts that cover a minimum of 20% of the
front façade (which façade shall exclude gables, windows, trim, and
doors). Other acceptable siding materials are stucco, synthetic stucco
(E.I.F.S.), or horizontal lap siding. Horizontal lap siding may be
manufactured from natural wood or cement fiber board or may be
premium quality vinyl siding with a minimum wall thickness of .042
inches. Synthetic Stucco (E.I.F.S.) siding shall be finished in a smooth,
sand or level texture with no rough textures permitted.
ii.Color. Elements of exterior facades (which include cladding, trim, and
doors) shall include a minimum of three (3) colors, except a minimum of
two (2) colors shall be included if the cladding is white.
c.Foundations. All foundations shall be faced entirely of brick and/or stone.
Synthetic or natural stucco foundations may be permitted for facades
constructed entirely of stucco.
d. Roofs.
i.Varied Roof Line. Varied roof designs and materials shall be used on
facades of dwellings that face a street. Main roof pitch shall be 7/12, and
there shall be a minimum roof overhang of twelve (12) inches on main
gables. Roof pitch may be decreased to match the architectural style of
the home, i.e. Pacific, Northwest, Modern, Craftsman, etc. Porches and
dormer pitches may be less than 7/12.
ii.Roof Materials. Roofing material shall be dimensional architectural
shingles with a minimum 30 year warranty. All flashing shall be copper
or pre-finished aluminum (bronze or black).
e. Porches, Stoops and Decks.
i.Front Porches. Individual porches and porticos shall be one-story in
height. Extended front porches shall be a minimum of 5’ deep. Handrails
and railings, when required by building code, shall be finished painted
wood or metal railing with vertical pickets, swan balusters or other
products of equal quality. Pickets shall be supported on top and bottom
rails that span between columns. Columns supporting roofs of porches,
porticos and covered stoops on street facing facades, shall be masonry
piers, tapered round (Tuscan or Doric) column, or square box columns a
minimum of 6” square as appropriate to the character of the unit. Other
high quality columns may be approved. Wooden front porches shall
1813SN0529-2017JUL26-BOS-RPT
include painted pickets, a painted band, and painted or vinyl lattice
underneath such porches.
ii.Rear Porches. All rear porches visible from public rights of way shall have
lattice or higher quality screening spanning between columns. Handrails
and railings, when required by building code, shall be finished painted
wood or metal railing with vertical pickets, swan balusters or other
products of equal quality.
f. Direct Vent Fireplaces. Direct vent gas fireplace boxes which protrude beyond
the exterior plane of the unit, are not permitted on front facades. All the exterior
materials and finishes used to enclose the fireplace box must match the adjacent
façade.
g. Front Walks/Driveways.
i.All private driveways serving residential uses shall be constructed of
either concrete or asphalt. This may include pavers as well as stamped
concrete driveways. Private driveways shall not require curb and gutter.
ii.A minimum of a three (3) foot wide concrete front walk shall be provided
to the front entrance of each dwelling unit, to connect to drives,
sidewalks or street.
iii.One (1) lamp post shall be provided in the front yard of each dwelling
unit. The design of such lamp posts shall be consistent throughout the
Property.
iv.If individual mailbox units are provided for each lot, the design of such
mailboxes shall be consistent throughout the development.
h. Landscaping and Yards. All front and side yards shall be sodded and irrigated.
Foundation planting beds shall be provided along the front façades of dwelling
units. Foundation planting beds shall be a minimum of four (4) feet wide as
measured from the foundation. Planting beds shall be defined with a trenched
edge or suitable landscape edging material. Planting beds shall include medium
shrubs spaced a maximum of four (4) feet apart. Corners shall be visually
softened with vertical accent shrubs (2-4’ in height) or small evergreen trees (5-
7’ in height) at the time of planting.
i.Garages. Any garages shall be permitted to extend past the front line of the
main dwelling provided that the architectural treatment of the garage (with
respect to fenestration, foundation treatment, and/or orientation) generally
conforms to the example photo attached hereto as Exhibit B. Flat panel garage
doors shall be prohibited.
1913SN0529-2017JUL26-BOS-RPT
j. Heating, Ventilation and Air Conditioning (HVAC) Units and Any Whole House
Generators. Units shall initially be screened from view of public roads by
landscaping or low maintenance material, as approved by the Planning
Department. (P)
2013SN0529-2017JUL26-BOS-RPT
New Proffered Condition 7 is hereby provided:
7.Development Standards for Multifamily Buildings. Development of the Property for
multi-family uses where Multi-Family (R-MF) uses are permitted shall be subject to the
following development standards.
a. Roof materials shall be 30 year architectural/dimensional asphalt composition
shingle.
b. Primary exterior wall materials (exclusive of windows, dormers, gables, doors,
trim, soffit and fascia) shall be brick, stone, cultured stone, stone veneer, fiber
cement siding, engineered wood, vinyl (a minimum of .042” nominal thickness as
evidenced by manufacturer’s printed literature) horizontal lap siding, or a
combination of the forgoing. Both vinyl and cedar shake siding are allowed. A
minimum of twenty percent (20%), in the aggregate, of the front elevation of
each building, excluding windows, doors, breezeways and architectural design
features, shall be of brick, stone or masonry construction.
Additional siding requirements:
i.A variety of facing materials shall be used on the front façade of any
building. A minimum of two facing materials shall be used on any the
front façade of any building.
ii.Buildings with the same color palette, percentages of siding materials,
and landscaping on the front elevation shall not be permitted side-by-
side to create diversity and interest along the streetscapes.
c. Foundation planting beds shall be required along the entire front façade of
buildings which face public streets, excluding access to porches, patios, and
garages, and shall contain a minimum of fifty (50) percent evergreen material
and have one shrub per three linear feet of foundation planting bed.
d. Street trees shall be planted along each side of the street no more than forty
(40) feet apart, to include entrance roads from public roads into the
development. If existing trees are maintained, and are located along the sides of
the streets, they may be counted toward this requirement.
e. Sidewalks shall be provided on both sides of the streets. The treatment and
location of these sidewalks shall be approved by the Planning Department at the
time of site plan review. (P)
2113SN0529-2017JUL26-BOS-RPT
ATTACHMENT 2
EXHIBIT A -TOWNHOUSE ELEVATIONS
2213SN0529-2017JUL26-BOS-RPT
2313SN0529-2017JUL26-BOS-RPT
2413SN0529-2017JUL26-BOS-RPT
2513SN0529-2017JUL26-BOS-RPT
ATTACHMENT 3
EXHIBIT B – GARAGE PROJECTION EXAMPLE (SINGLE-FAMILY)
2613SN0529-2017JUL26-BOS-RPT
ATTACHMENT 4
APPROVED CONDITIONS (03SN0288)
2713SN0529-2017JUL26-BOS-RPT
2813SN0529-2017JUL26-BOS-RPT
2913SN0529-2017JUL26-BOS-RPT
3013SN0529-2017JUL26-BOS-RPT
3113SN0529-2017JUL26-BOS-RPT
3213SN0529-2017JUL26-BOS-RPT
ATTACHMENT 5
APPROVED TEXTUAL STATEMENT (03SN0288)
3313SN0529-2017JUL26-BOS-RPT
3413SN0529-2017JUL26-BOS-RPT
ATTACHMENT 6
APPROVED MASTER PLAN (03SN0288)
3513SN0529-2017JUL26-BOS-RPT