2017-04-26 MinutesBOARD OF. SUPERVISORS
MINUTES
April 26, 2017
Supervisors in Attendance:
Ms. Dorothy A. Jaeckle, Chair
Ms. Leslie A. T. Haley, Vice Chair
Mr. Christopher M. Winslow
Mr. James M. Holland
Mr. Stephen A. Elswick
Dr. Joseph P. Casey
County Administrator
Ms. Jaeckle called the meeting to order at 3:00 p.m. She
offered her condolences to Ms. Haley on the recent passing of
her father.
1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES FOR MARCH 29, 2017
On motion of Mr. Winslow, seconded by Mr. Holland, the Board
approved the minutes of March 29, 2017, as submitted.
Ayes: Jaeckle, Haley, Winslow, Holland and Elswick.
Nays: None.
2. REQUESTS TO POSTPONE AGENDA ITEMS AND ADDITIONS,
DELETIONS OR CHANGES IN THE ORDER OF PRESENTATION
On motion. of Mr. Holland, seconded by Ms. Haley, the Board
received revised attachments to Item 12.B., Amendment,
Restatement, and Approval of the School Board Supplemental
Retirement Program and approved the agenda, as amended.
Ayes: Jaeckle, Haley, Winslow, Holland and Elswick.
Nays: None.
3. WORK SESSIONS -
3.A. INTRODUCTION OF NEW REGISTRAR
Dr. Casey introduced and welcomed Chesterfield County's new
Registrar, Ms. Constance Tyler. He stated Ms. Tyler began her
career in elections in the City of Richmond as a senior
assistant registrar. He further stated Ms. Tyler currently
serves as the General Registrar and Director of Elections for
Chesterfield County.
Ms. Tyler thanked Dr. Casey and the Board of Supervisors for
the introduction and expressed enthusiasm for her new role as
Registrar..
16-7.60
04/26/17
3.B. REFINANCING OF CHIPPENHAM PLACE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
AUTHORITY
Mr. Harris presented an update to the Board regarding the
refinancing of Chippenham Place Community Development
Authority. He stated the redevelopment of the former
Cloverleaf Mall site into the mixed-use development, now
known as Stonebridge, has been facilitated by the creation of
the Chippenham Place Community Development Authority (CDA).
He further stated the CDA is a financing mechanism that was
used to fund the demolition of the former mall buildings and
construct core infrastructure on the site, with the cost of
those, improvements paid back over time through revenues
(sales and property taxes) generated from the subsequent
development. He stated over time as the development has
matured, the CDA financing has been revised to reflect the
increasing strength of the project. He further stated
Stonebridge has reached a point where the levels'of economic
activity on the site are such that they can fully support a
final iteration of the financing and do so under very
favorable terms. He stated the work session is intended to
discuss the parameters of the proposed final financing for
the project and preview the related actions that are
requested as part of the evening agenda.
Mr. Jay Lafler, former Cloverleaf Mall manager and member of
the CDA, stated there are still areas within the Cloverleaf
Mall redevelopment project that need improvements. He further
stated everyone involved has contributed to the
successfulness of the project. He stated the county should be
very pleased with the investment of the CDA.
Discussion.ensued relative to the mixed -use -development along
Chippenham Parkway and the successful revitalization efforts
due to the creation of the Chippenham Place Community
Development Authority.
3.C. GALLOWAY PLACE UPDATE
Ms. Burcham provided an update to the Board regarding
Galloway Place. She stated approximately eight years ago,
families of individuals with intellectual disabilities with
high medical needs approached the CSB to open an Intermediate
Care facility. She further stated there are currently only
three other ICFs operating in Chesterfield County. She stated
after careful consideration and due diligence by the Board of
Supervisors and the CSB, a new facility was specially
designed and built for this population which opened in August
2014. She further stated the CSB and the Board of Supervisors
agreed that .the operations of the facility would be in
partnership with a private provider. She noted an RFP was
issued with three respondents submitting proposals. She
stated one respondent backed out and the other respondent was
too small of an organization to successfully manage the 12 -
bed facility. She further stated a contract was therefore
awarded to Community Alternatives Virginia, Inc. She stated
in January 2017, after two years of operating the facility,
the CSB was notified by the parent company, ResCare. of their
intent to end the contract in July 2017. She further stated'
after hearing of ResCare's plans, a new RFP was immediately
written and issued on February 22nd of this year and 176
notices of the RFP were sent to firms in the industry as well
as being advertised in the Richmond Times Dispatch. She
16-761
04/26/17
stated the RFP closed on March 30th and there were no
proposals received. She further stated due to the 11
individuals currently residing at Galloway Place who will
need continued care and no other ICF available in
Chesterfield County to take these residents, the CSB will
begin to operate Galloway Place on July 1, 2017. She stated
because the CSB has been paying Community Alternatives
Virginia to operate Galloway Place, there will be no budget
impact to the CSB's Special Revenue Fund; however, the county
will need to create 38 new full-time employees in order to
hire the current staff of Galloway Place and to be able to
continue to operate the facility. She noted this change will
be handled as an amendment to the 2018 county budget
document.
In response to Mr. Winslow's question, Ms. Burcham stated the
Chesterfield Community Services Board's operation of Galloway
Place is a permanent solution and if there are other
interested parties that move into the county, the issue can
be revisited at that time.
Mr. Holland voiced his approval of the county's operation of
the Intermediate. Care Facility and stated the financials are
reasonable.
Ms. Jaeckle voiced her reservations and stated there will
continue to be challenges to successfully manage the very
labor-intensive facilitv.
Discussion ensued relative to the Board's decision to approve
the;Intermediate Care Facility in 2014.
In response to Mr. Winslow's question, Ms. Burcham stated
families of individuals who reside in the facility, as well
as staff, were notified of the changes and were very grateful
to be moving under Chesterfield County's management.
Mr. Elswick asked members of the Community Services Board to
stand to be recognized.
Ms. Burcham stated she would provide an update to the Board
in May relative to Mental Health activities to combat the
opiate epidemic and other substance addictions in
Chesterfield.
3.D. POLICE DEPARTMENT UPDATE
Colonel Dupuis provided an update to the Board of Supervisors
on crime reports, body -worn cameras, and the Commission on
Accreditation for Law Enforcement Accreditation. He stated he
accepted the CALEA Accreditation award on behalf of the
department. He further stated the award is the culmination of
several years of self-evaluation by the department and the
result of a rigorous review Eby a team of independent
assessors and CALEA's commissioners. In regards to crime
statistics, he reviewed calls for service and assists,
robbery and burglary incidents, and motor vehicle thefts. He
stated there has been a 39 percent increase in robberies and
a 54 percent increase in street robberies since- 2012. He
further stated robberies of cell phones and robberies during
drug transactions have also increased.
16-762
04/26/17
In response to Ms. Jaeckle's question, Colonel Dupuis stated
a robbery is theft from a person by force.
He stated since 2012, there has been a 258 percent increase
in handguns stolen, and 217 percent of all guns stolen in
larceny from auto incidents.
In response to Ms. Jaeckle's question, Colonel Dupuis stated
individuals do not remove their valuable possessions and/or
lock their vehicles which can drastically reduce the
likelihood of theft.
In response to Mr. Elswick's question, Colonel Dupuis stated
it is likely more people are carrying handguns; however,
criminal activity runs in cycles based on trends.
In response to Dr. Casey's question, Colonel Dupuis clarified
one incident counts for a vehicle stolen with an individual's
weapon inside.
He then reviewed heroin overdose statistics and stated the
Police Department has seen dramatic increases in heroin
overdoses, especially in 2015 and 2016. He stated the
department is continuing to push out' information and has
started special groups that come together to treat those
afflicted with heroin addiction.
In response to Mr. Holland's question, Colonel Dupuis stated
an individual using heroin needs intervention as it is nearly.
impossible for an addict to quit without professional
assistance.
Discussion ensued relative to the heroin epidemic and the
difficulty of treating addiction without force.
In regards to body -worn cameras, Lieutenant Colonel Dan Kelly
stated 50 body cameras issued to officers were discontinued
after cables between the camera and its controller overheated
on several units. He further stated the problem arose after
two days of training. He stated Chesterfield entered into a
contract last year with Axon and the department plans to
equip 450 officers with the cameras by the end of this year.
In response to Mr. Elswick's question, Colonel Dupuis stated
the cables overheated right away once activated. He further
stated the cables must be breakable for the safety of
officers and maintain a charge. He stated Axon has been very
accommodating thus far and he is confident with the program
and the product.
In response to Dr. Casey's inquiry regarding training,
Lieutenant Colonel Kelly stated last year in anticipation of
receiving the body -worn cameras, every officer had to go
through training as well as an additional four hours of
training this year regarding the policy, possible scenarios
and how to operate the equipment. He further stated for
officers in the field, the camera is on all the time;
however, it is not recording unless the officer starts
recording with a thirty-second buffer. 'He noted officers are
not capable of deleting and/or editing any record6d footage.
In response to Ms. Jaeckle's question, Lieutenant Colonel
Kelly stated docking stations are located in most Police
training and district stations.
In response to Mr. Holland's question, Lieutenant Colonel
Kelly stated unlimited storage, software updates and extended
warranties are provided through the provider.
Discussion ensued relative to the program.
16-763
04/26/17
3.E. DEMOGRAPHICS AND DEVELOPMENT
Mr. Steve Haasch, Planning Manager, and Ms. Chelsea Hartman,
Planner, provided an update to the Board of Supervisors
regarding major demographic trends and projections along with
growth and development information of the county. She stated
since 1970, the county's growth rate has been six times
greater than the US and five times greater that the state and
the region. She further stated though the county's growth
rate has slowed since the peak change during the 19701s, the
county is holding a 1 percent growth rate annually since
2010. She stated as of 2017, there is an estimated population
of 340,000 in the county and projections forecast a continued
slowing of the growth rate due to the aging population and
low birth rate trends. She noted the population is projected
to reach over 392,000 by 2030. She stated the age wave is a
major trend that is being seen today and will become more
prominent into the future. She further stated the 55 and
older population is -expected to grow the fastest between now
and 2030, increasing from one-fourth of the county's
population today, to nearly one-third. She stated along with
aging, the population is growing more racially and ethnically
diverse. She further stated the Hispanic or Latino population
has grown the most significantly with the 234 percent
increase and includes over 25,000 people as of 2015. She
stated as of 2015, Chesterfield County is estimated to have
over 116,000 households, and nearly two-thirds of county
households do not have children under 18 present even though
the majority of households consist of families.
In response to Ms. Jaeckle's question, Ms. Hartman stated the
statistics do not break down the number of children per
household who attend public school, private school or those
who are homeschooled.
Dr. Casey clarified that while 33 percent of households have
school-age children under 18 years old, that percentage
decreases to 23 percent. He stated those trends have declined
significantly since the 1970s.
Ms. Hartman continued her presentation by stating as of 2015,
the county's median household income is $72,609, which
exceeds that of the region, state and nation and indicates a
generally affluent locality. She noted while the county has a
lower poverty rate compared to the region, state and nation,
the number of individuals in poverty is growing with an
increase of 110 percent since 2000.
Discussion ensued relative to increasing poverty data trends
and its relation to the county's diverse population.
Dr. Casey stated an initiative is underway to measure the
able-bodied population and their duration as a client of
Social Services. He noted the state does not track the
duration statistic.
Discussion ensued- relative to integrating affordable housing
and providing transportation along the Jefferson Davis
Corridor.
16-764
04/26/17
Ms. Hartman continued her presentation by stating residential,
construction was at its peak in the mid -1980's and spiked
again in the 2000's until the recession.
In response to Mr. Elswick's question regarding the ideal
growth rate for residential housing, Mr. Haasch stated
because Chesterfield is such a large county, a concentrated
area of growth in the county will have a huge impact on
county services; however, if the growth is spread -out amongst
the acreage of.the county, the population could be absorbed.
He further stated as the growth rate percentage is declining,
the number of people is still significant. He stated the
average number of persons per household is 2.5 and declining.
Dr. Casey noted many suburban counties like Chesterfield do
not have the practices in place to keep up with the
infrastructure. He stated if the county's business model is
not in tune to deploy a new school. or deploy redistricting
where appropriate, it is a pressure point if the growth rate
increase was driven by school age children. He further stated
the growth is commensurate with jobs and other commercial
investments to the tax base.
Mr. Haasch stressed the importance of planning ahead based on
population statistics and service demands.
Discussion ensued relative to refurbishing aging school
facilities and the challenge of established neighborhoods in
conjunction with an increased growth rate.
Ms. Hartman continued her presentation by stating housing
growth has occurred throughout the county and subdivision
growth has been concentrated between Midlothian Turnpike and
Hull Street Road. She stated there are over 200 active
housing projects and these projects have gone beyond zoning
and have approved tentative development plans in place. She
further stated these projects would add over 16,000 housing
units, equivalent ,to about 15 years of growth at current
levels of activity. Mr. Haasch then reviewed the
Comprehensive Plan update meeting schedule.
In response to Ms. Jaeckle's question, Mr. Haasch stated the
joint meeting with the Board of Supervisors and the Planning
Commission regarding the Comprehensive Plan is anticipated to
take 1-2 hours. He further stated he would coordinate with
Ms. Blakley to present the material at a future Board of
Supervisors meeting.
In closing, Mr. Haasch briefly reviewed key issues
highlighted in the presentation.
Ms. Jaeckle stressed the importance of paying attention to
future millennials' desire of placing their children in
private school.
Discussion ensued relative to important issues and
opportunities relative to the county's demographics and
development.
16-765
04/26/17
4. REPORTS
4.A. REPORT OF PLANNING COMMISSION SUBSTANTIAL ACCORD
DETERMINATION FOR CHESTERFIELD COUNTY PUBLIC LIBRARIES
(CASE 17PD0207) TO PERMIT LIBRARY USE IN A COMMUNITY
BUSINESS (C-3) DISTRICT
4.B. REPORT OF PLANNING COMMISSION SUBSTANTIAL ACCORD
DETERMINATION FOR CHESTERFIELD COUNTY PARKS AND
RECREATION (CASE 17PD0218) TO PERMIT A NEIGHBORHOOD
PARK IN A REGIONAL BUSINESS (C-4) DISTRICT LOCATED IN
THE MIDLOTHIAN DISTRICT
The Board took no action on the following reports: a Report
of Planning Commission Substantial Accord Determination for
Chesterfield County Public Libraries (Case 17PD0207) to
Permit Library Use in a Community Business (C-3) District;
and a Report of -Planning Commission Substantial Accord
Determination for Chesterfield County Parks and Recreation
(Case 17PD0218) to Permit a Neighborhood Park in a Regional
Business (C-4) District Located in the Midlothian District.
5. FIFTEEN -MINUTE CITIZEN COMMENT PERIOD ON UNSCHEDULED
MATTERS
Ms. Karen Zimmer urged the Board to continue their support of
Chesterfield County Public Schools.
Ms. Jenefer Hughes urged the Board to continue their support
of Chesterfield County Public Schools.
Dr. Maggie Dolan suggested the Board bring in an outside
consultant for important long -reaching issues.
Ms. Brenda Stewart expressed concerns relative to the process
for adopting ordinances.
Mr. Rodney Martin expressed concerns relative to wasteful
spending and recommended hiring an outside consultant to
review county audit functions.
Reconvening in the Public Meeting Room:
7. INVOCATION
The Honorable Stephen Elswick, Matoaca District Supervisor,
gave the invocation.
8. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Deputy County Administrator Bill Dupler led the Pledge of
Allegiance to the Flag of the United States of America.
Ms. Jaeckle offered her condolences to Ms.
16-766
Haley on the
04/26/17
recent passing of her father.
9. COUNTY ADMINISTRATION UPDATE
9.A. EVERY DAY EXCELLENCE - EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT
PROFESSIONAL OF THE YEAR
Dr. Casey recognized Ms. Sherri Laffoon, an analyst with the
Emergency Management Division of Fire and EMS Department, and
congratulated.- her on being awarded the Warren E. Trent
Individual Achievement Award by the Virginia Emergency
Management Association.
Ms. Jaeckle also congratulated Ms. Laffoon and stated her
husband, Mr. Mike Laffoon also served the county in various
departments.
9.B. OTHER COUNTY ADMINISTRATION UPDATES
• Dr. Casey stated in recognition of Local Government
Education Week, April 1-7, Chesterfield County
government and school leaders served as guest speakers
in civics and economics classrooms through Chesterfield
County Public -Schools.
• Dr. Casey announced that registration is full for the
spring Government Citizens Academy which begins on May
16th. He stated residents will participate in weekly
sessions at various locations learning about the county,
concluding with a graduation ceremony at the June Board
of Supervisors meeting.
• Dr. Casey announced the Government Finance Officers
Association has awarded Chesterfield County's Accounting
Department a Certificate of Achievement for Excellence
in Financial Reporting for its annual financial report
for the .fiscal year that ended June 30, 2016. He
recognized Ms. Patsy Brown and her staff who were in the
audience.
10. BOARD MEMBER REPORTS
Mr. Winslow thanked Mr. Scott Smedley and Environmental
Engineering staff. for their personal attention in assisting
with several Clover Hill constituents on drainage issues. He
also thanked Dr. Deborah Marks and Clover Hill High School
for hosting its art show this past Saturday. Lastly, he
congratulated Ms. Courtney Carpenter, teacher at Evergreen
Elementary School for her successful application for a grant.
from the Greater Richmond Council of Teachers of Mathematics..
Ms. Haley welcomed Boy Scout -Troop 869, chartered at
Salisbury Presbyterian Church in Midlothian, who were in
attendance.- She also announced she attended an intercity
visit to Pittsburg, Pennsylvania. Lastly, she recognized the
Bailey Bridge Middle School 7th grade student Elena Espinal,
accompanied by her mother, who won a contest to design a
commemorative flag for the 400th anniversary of the death of
Pocahontas.
Ms. Lynne Bland, K-12 Instructional Specialist for History
16-767
04/26/17
and Social Science at Chesterfield County Public Schools,
expressed her appreciation to Dr. Casey and Mr. Scott Zaremba
for educating students about the various jobs in local
government.
Mr. Holland. congratulated players of the L. C. Bird Boys High
School Basketball team for their 5A state championship win.
He also announced the Dale District held a joint community
meeting with School Board member John Erbach regarding
citizen input on the Committee on the Future's proposed
recommendations: Safeguarding Financial Security - for
residents.
Mr. Elswick expressed his appreciation to those attending the
meeting.
Ms. Jaeckle recognized and expressed her appreciation to Ms.
Janice Blakley, Clerk, and Ms. Sara Hall, Deputy Clerk, in
observance of Administrative Professionals Day.
11. RESOLUTIONS
11.A. RECOGNIZING MAY AS "OLDER AMERICANS MONTH" IN
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
Ms. Leidheiser introduced Miss Sandhya Gentius-Harris, Miss
Marjorie Rawlings, Miss R'Mia Crutchfield, Miss Maddie Cross,
Miss Kychaun Goode, Mr. Ethan Minter, Miss Kendall Rodriguez,
Miss Virginia Collins, Miss Natalie Sanner, and Miss- Alyssa
Williams.
On motion of Mr. Holland, seconded by Mr. Winslow, the Board
adopted the following resolution:
WHEREAS, Chesterfield County includes a thriving
community of older Americans who richly contribute to our
community; and
WHEREAS, Chesterfield County and the Office of the
Senior Advocate acknowledge that what it means "to age" has
changed - for the better; and
WHEREAS, Chesterfield County is committed to supporting
older adults as they take charge of their health, explore new
opportunities and activities, and focus on independence; and
WHEREAS, Chesterfield County can provide opportunities
to enrich the lives of individuals of all ages by involving
older adults in the redefinition of aging in our community;
promoting home- and community-based services that, support
independent living; encouraging older adults to speak up for
themselves and'others; and providing opportunities for older
adults to share their experiences; and
WHEREAS, many organizations and Chesterfield County
departments provide services and programs to help older
residents in Chesterfield County lead active, fulfilling and
independent lives and to remain in their homes; and
WHEREAS, Chesterfield TRIAD declares the first Wednesday
in May, as Senior Day in Chesterfield County; and
16-768
04/26/17
WHEREAS, the Senior Advocate's office sponsored an essay
contest for fourth and fifth grade Chesterfield County
students to acknowledge positive older adult role models,
celebrate intergenerational relationships and demonstrate
good writing skills, and Sandhya Gentius-Harris of J. B.
Watkins Elementary School is being recognized as the grand
prize winner of the contest in which she acknowledged her
grandfather; and
WHEREAS, the following students are being recognized as
the school winners in the contest: Marjorie Rawlings, Bettie
Weaver Elementary; R'Mia Crutchfield, C. C. Wells Elementary;
Maddie Cross, Crestwood Elementary; Kychaun Goode, Ettrick
Elementary; Ethan Minter, Harrowgate Elementary; Kendall
Rodriguez, Matoaca Elementary; Virginia Collins, Swift Creek
Elementary; Natalie Sanner, J. B. Watkins Elementary; and
Alyssa Williams, Winterpock Elementary; and
WHEREAS, Lois Boone is being recognized as the winner in
the adult essay contest to recognize and celebrate what
getting older looks like today.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chesterfield
County Board of Supervisors recognizes May as "Older
Americans Month" in Chesterfield County and urges every
resident to take time during this month to acknowledge older
adults and the people who serve them as influential and vital
parts of our community.
Ayes: Jaeckle, Haley,.Winslow, Holland and Elswick.
Nays: None.
All Board members and Dr. Casey each congratulated the school
contest winners and stressed the importance of recognizing
older adults and the loved one who inspired their essays.
11.B. RECOGNIZING MS. DAWN MISSORY, DEPARTMENT OF MENTAL
HEALTH SUPPORT SERVICES, UPON HER RETIREMENT
Ms. Burcham introduced Ms. Dawn Missory, who was present to
receive the resolution.
On motion of Mr. Holland, seconded by Mr. Winslow, the Board
adopted the following resolution:
WHEREAS, Ms. Dawn Missory was hired by Chesterfield
Mental Health Support Services on May 4, 1987, and will
retire May 1, 2017, after providing 30 years of outstanding
service to the residents of Chesterfield County; and
WHEREAS, Ms. Missory served in many capacities at
Chesterfield Employment Services (CES) including Data Entry
Operator, Administrative Assistant, Administrative
Supervisor, Administrative Manager and Transit Manager; and
WHEREAS, Ms.. Missory provided oversight and supervision
to CES's transportation service which included the expansion
of its fleet from six vans to 30 vehicles, expanded hours of
operation to over 20 hours a day, and she helped manage a
$1.3 million annual budget; and
16-769
04/26/17
WHEREAS, Ms. Missory -was awarded a grant in 199.6 from
the Department of Rehabilitative Services to computerize
transportation scheduling, was responsible for annual
completion of_ 5310 Grant Applications which resulted in
awards of over 30 vehicles, and submitted a Technology
Improvement Program (TIP) project in 2013 that resulted in
the implementation of GPS in fleet vehicles; and
WHEREAS, Ms. Missory worked with the Department of
Medical Assistance Services (DMAS) to become an authorized
Medicaid Transportation Provider bringing new revenue to
offset transportation expenses;'and
WHEREAS, Ms. Missory developed and provided insight .and
supervision to the Access Chesterfield Program including
working with the Deputy County Administrator of Human
Services to create a voucher program for,elderly, people with
disabilities and low-income residents of Chesterfield, as
well as participating in the Request for Proposal (RFP.)
process to select vendors for this service; and
WHEREAS, Ms. Missory led a team on the Re -Route Project
in 2009, eliminating $35,000 in overtime pay resulting in the
receipt of a NACo award; and
WHEREAS, Ms. Missory completed three County
Certification.Courses: the Supervisory Institute in 1992, the
School of Quality and Continuous Improvement in 2006, and the
School of Leadership and Personal Effectiveness in 2009; and
WHEREAS, Ms. Missory also completed many external
certifications including Community Transit Manager, Training
and Safety Reviewer, Passenger Assistance Safety and
Sensitivity (PASS) Trainer, and CPR/First Aid Trainer, and
she also completed Levels 100 through 40'0 of the Pennsylvania
Transportation Resource and Information Network's
Professional Supervisor Program; and
WHEREAS, Ms. Missory had extensive involvement with
Community Transportation Association of Virginia (CTAV)
including serving on the Board since 2001 and as Vice
President from 2008-2012 and President from 2012-2016, was
twice awarded the CTAV President's Award, participated in
over 20 Paratransit ROADEO competitions and attended 17 EXPOs
which provided training to paratransit providers across the
state; and
WHEREAS, Ms. Missory worked with Chesterfield County
Human Services, the Richmond Chapter of the American Red
Cross, Lucy Corr Nursing Home, Chesterfield County Health
Department and Social Services to form the Human Service
Transit Services; and
WHEREAS., Ms. Missory collaborated with many
organizations including the Governor's Specialized
Transportation Council, Hanover Community Services Board,
Chesterfield County Fleet Steering Committee and other
departments within Chesterfield Mental Health Support
Services.
16-770
04/26/17
. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chesterfield
County Board of Supervisors, this 26th day of April 2017,
publicly recognizes the outstanding contributions of Ms. Dawn
Missory and extends appreciation, on behalf of its members
and the citizens of Chesterfield County, for 30 years of
dedicated service to the county, congratulations upon her
retirement, and best wishes for a long, happy and healthy
retirement.
AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that a copy of this
resolution be presented to Ms. Missory and that this
resolution be permanently recorded among the papers of this
Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County, Virginia.
Ayes: Jaeckle, Haley, Winslow, Holland and Elswick.
Nays: None.
Ms. Jaeckle presented the executed resolution to Ms. Missory
and commended her on her many years of loyal and dedicated
service to Chesterfield County.
Mr. Holland, Ms. Haley, Mr. Winslow and Mr. Elswick expressed
their appreciation to Ms. Missory for her valuable
professionalism and highly praised her many contributions to
the county.
Dr. Casey presented Ms. Missory with an acrylic statue and
county watch, highly praised her outstanding and noteworthy
service and wished her well upon her retirement.
11.C. RECOGNIZING MR. BRYAN H. WALKER FOR HIS SERVICE ON
THE CHESTERFIELD PRESERVATION COMMITTEE
Mr. Turner introduced Mr. Bryan H. Walker, who was present to
receive the resolution.
On motion of Mr. Winslow, seconded by Mr. Elswick, the Board
adopted the following resolution:
WHEREAS, Mr. Bryan H. Walker served as a dedicated and .
faithful member of the Chesterfield County Preservation
Committee since his appointment by the Board of Supervisors
on March 11, 1987; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Walker served ten consecutive terms as the
local historic society representative; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Walker served with distinction as member
of the original organizing committee and for 30 additional
years as a member of the Preservation Committee; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Walker was a diligent and contributing
member of the Preservation Committee and recommended the
local designation of 48 historic sites and structures in
Chesterfield County; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Walker advocated for the preservation and
donation of the site of the Falling Creek Ironworks, the
first iron furnace in America built in 1619, and served for
many years as the first president of the Falling Creek
Ironworks Foundation; and
16-771
04/26/17
WHEREAS, Mr. Walker is a lifelong resident of
Chesterfield County and has been actively involved in
contributing and improving the community by serving on many
other community organizations, including the Chesterfield
Historical Society, the Parks and Recreation Advisory
Committee, the Jefferson Davis Association, the Friends of
Chesterfield's Riverfront, as well as a volunteer at the
Bensley Fire Station; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chesterfield
County Board of Supervisors, this 26th day of April 2017,
publicly recognizes Mr. Bryan' H. Walker" and expresses
sincere appreciation for his many years of commitment and
significant contributions in the promotion and preservation
of the historic fabric of Chesterfield County.
AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that a copy of this
resolution be presented to Mr. Bryan H. Walker and that it
be permanently recorded among the papers of the Board of
Supervisors of Chesterfield County, Virginia.
Ayes:. Jaeckle, Haley, Winslow, Holland and Elswick.
Nays: None.
Ms. Jaeckle presented the executed resolution to Mr. Walker
and expressed her appreciation for his many years of service
and contributions in the historic, preservation of
Chesterfield County. '
Mr. Walker thanked Ms. Jaeckle and members of the Board of
Supervisors for the special recognition and kind sentiments.
Members of the Chesterfield Preservation Committee commended
Mr. Walker for his dedicated and loyal service to
Chesterfield County.
11.D. RECOGNIZING THE 150TH ANNIVERSARY OF FIRST BAPTIST
CHURCH (CENTRALIA)
Ms. Pollard introduced Dr. Wilson Edward Brown Shannon, Dr.
Jane Baskerville and members of the First Baptist Church
(Centralia), who were present to receive the resolution.
On motion of Mr. Holland, seconded by Ms. Jaeckle, the Board
adopted the following resolution:
WHEREAS, on April 7, 1867, just two years following the
end of the Civil War, the First Baptist Church was organized -
under the name of the Salem African Baptist Church, and the
name was later changed to the First Baptist Church
(Centralia); and
WHEREAS, the small group of members who formed this -
church had previously worshiped with the Salem Baptist
Church; and
WHEREAS, with help and blessings from their mother
church, members originally worshiped under a brush arbor on _
the property, then moved to a modest frame structure located
on the west side of the land; and
16-77.2
04/26/17
WHEREAS, the one -acre plot of land on which they
worshiped was given by Mr. and Mrs. P. A. Chalkley, and
lumber for the church was donated by Mr. Ben Duval, members
of Salem Baptist Church; and
WHEREAS, in 1897, that modest sanctuary was erected
under the leadership of the Reverend T. H. Johnson; and
WHEREAS, circa 1910, during the administration of the
Reverend William Thomas, the church was remodeled into the
building we know today as Historic First Baptist (Centralia);
and
WHEREAS, admired for its twin towers, this second church
building combined elements of the Gothic Revival, Colonial
Revival and Shingle styles; and
WHEREAS, in 1950, the Reverend Samuel Moss Carter was
called to be its pastor and served for 40 years; and
WHEREAS, in 1962, the church purchased 72 acres of land,
which it later sold to purchase land for its present site on
Kingsdale Road; and
WHEREAS, on July 1, 1962, a groundbreaking ceremony was
held for the new church, and the congregation attended its
first service at the new site on.August 4, 1963; and
WHEREAS, on Homecoming Sunday, October 21, 1973, ten
years after the new church was built, a ceremony was held to
burn the mortgage to the church, thereby liquidating all debt
held by First Baptist Church (Centralia); and
WHEREAS, Dr. Wilson Edward Brown Shannon was called to
First Baptist in January of 1991, and was installed on March
17, 1991; and
WHEREAS, with a vision for an even greater ministry, Dr.
Shannon is expanding the Samuel Moss Carter Family Life
Center to a 45,000 square foot extension to include Pre -
School accommodations for 150 children, banquet facilities
for 750 occupants,. an indoor Olympic -sized swimming pool, and
other amenities supportive of family life ministry; and
WHEREAS, in 1996, a groundbreaking ceremony was held for
the extension of this Family Life Center under the theme, "It
can be done, and we can do it"; and
WHEREAS, On April 16, 1996, members mourned the loss of
the Historic First Baptist Church (Centralia) by fire; and
WHEREAS, Dr.. Shannon expressed forgiveness for the
arsonists, and told parishioners that "God said to me, Wilson
Shannon, I want you to put it back"!
WHEREAS, Dr. Shannon's pronouncement was the rallying
call to the church community, and members who were
professionals in architectural drafting, brick masonry,
plastering and contracting, in addition to others in the
community, came together to restore the historic church; and
WHEREAS, the renovation was completed in April 1997, and
a grand celebration was held to rededicate the historic
church, just one year after fire devastated it; and
16-773
04/26/17
WHEREAS, on March 19, 2017, Dr. Shannon'and his family
celebrated 26 years of being at the helm of what he calls
"The Flagship Church," and Dr. Shannon takes seriously his
charge to lead the members in keeping the faith and upholding
the legacy of the church for future generations; and
WHEREAS, on November 22, 2014, in recognition of its
architectural and historical significance, parishioners and
the community celebrated the approval of the site of Historic
First Baptist Church (Centralia) as a designated Chesterfield
County Historic Landmark, and a Virginia_ Historical Highway
Marker was installed on November 7, 2015; and
WHEREAS, the First Baptist Church ('Centralia) has always
I ontinued to grow and prosper in fellowship, stewardship and
service to its members and the surrounding -community; and
WHEREAS, the church also has been a spiritual beacon for
its members for 150 years, helping them through the
challenges of independence, the Great Depression, societal
changes, physical growth, world wars, arson, and familial
joys and sorrows.
. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT .RESOLVED that, the Chesterfield
County Board of Supervisors, this 26th day of April 2017, on
behalf of the citizens of Chesterfield County, publicly
recognizes and congratulates the congregation of First
Baptist Church (Centralia) on its 150th anniversary- and
wishes them continued success and joy in all their endeavors.
Ayes: Jaeckle, Haley, Winslow, Holland and Elswick.
Nays: None.
Mr. Holland presented the executed resolution to Dr. Shannon
and Dr. Baskerville, congratulated the congregation on its
150th anniversary, and.wished them continued accomplishments
to grow and prosper in fellowship.
Ms. Jaeckle highly praised Dr. Shannon for his stewardship
and service to the church members and the surrounding
community.
Dr. Baskerville expressed sincere appreciation to the Board
for the special recognition.
12. NEW BUSINESS
12.A. APPOINTMENTS
12.A.1. CENTRAL VIRGINIA WASTE MANAGEMENT AUTHORITY
On motion of Mr. Winslow, seconded by Mr. Holland, the Board
nominated/ appointed Mr. Al Pace as an alternate board member
and reassigned Mr. Clay Bowles to be an alternate of an
existing board member, to serve on the Central Virginia Waste
Management Authority, whose terms are effective immediately
and will expire on December 31, 2020.
Ayes: Jaeckle, Haley, Winslow, Holland and Elswick.
Nays: None.
16-774
04/26/17
12.A.2. CAMP BAKER MANAGEMENT BOARD
On motion of Mr. Holland, seconded by Mr. Winslow, the Board
nominated/ reappointed Mr. James Lumpkin to serve on the Camp
Baker Management Board, whose term is effective May 1, 2017
and will expire on April 30, 2020.
Ayes: Jaeckle, Haley., Winslow, Holland and Elswick.
Nays: None.
12.B. AMENDMENT, RESTATEMENT, AND APPROVAL OF THE SCHOOL
BOARD SUPPLEMENTAL RETIREMENT PROGRAM
Dr. Casey gave some introductory remarks prior to the
presentation by stating the SRP problem has been a growing
outstanding liability issue with Schools since the last time
Schools SRP was before the Board of Supervisors for changes
in 1997. He further stated in recent years, the issue has
been compounded due to stronger accounting standards and
rating agency focus _on pension liabilities. He stated peer
schools have already placed fiscal constraints upon their
plans which has positioned Chesterfield's plan to be one of
the highest pension benefits among its peers. He then
stressed the -importance of the county's Triple AAA bond
rating. He stated a bond rating is more than just the
millions the county saves in getting the lowest interest rate
on a debt issuance. He further stated a bond rating is the
only recognized third party validation to a business or
locality's financial, debt, economic and management
environment. He stated the rating gives existing businesses
comfort in expansion plans and has Chesterfield on short
lists for new business prospects. He further stated for many
of county liabilities *via debt issuances there is an
offsetting asset in the school, road, library, or other asset
built; however, a pension liability has no offsetting asset
and severely constraints the fiscal health of a locality or a
business. He stated the county values its workforce and many
employees came to Chesterfield Schools in good faith for a
fulfilling career and the related salaries and benefits
offered. He noted for those who have a long career with the
county, nearly all of them should not see any impact to their
pension benefit. In closing, he recognized Finance Director
Allan Carmody, Deputy County Administrator Scott Zaremba,
Accounting Director Patsy Brown, County Attorney Jeff Mincks
and staff for their tremendous efforts relative to the
matter. He also noted a proposed revision to Section 5.4 to
expand the Administrative Committee to six persons, three of
whom shall be selected by the County Administrator with one
of the three being a citizen with investment or banking
experience.
Mr. Carmody presented information to the Board relative to
how unfunded liabilities will be mitigated in both dollars
and duration, how the county's triple AAA bond rating will be
preserved with a fiscally prudent plan and how these changes
will ensure that annual appropriations of taxpayer funds will
be reasonable. He stated the School SRP item represents the
culmination of a comprehensive effort put forth by county
staff with expertise in finance, legal, employee benefits,
and pension plan management after receiving a proposal from
the school administration. He further stated the recommended
proposal leans more strongly toward a financial perspective,
16-775
04/26/17
1 i
focused on reducing the unfunded liability, while the school
proposal leans more strongly toward the employee compensation
perspective. He stated the item is .presented for several
reasons: to have the Board amend and restate the school plan
to incorporate 'substantive changes made by the School Board,
but not brought to the Board of Supervisors; the proposal
will improve the financial position of the plan trust fund by
reducing the liability, lowering the required annual
contributions, and advancing the funded status; and the
recommendation also established strengthened plan management
aspects designed to ensure proper and timely payments are
made, including provisions extending the authority to make
such payments to the County Administrator that can be carried
out by an accompanying agenda item presented this evening. He
further stated the proposal is ,designed to reduce the
unfunded liability, reduce pressure on operations, and
improve the funded ratio. He stated the School SRP will,be
better positioned to reach its goal going forward under- the
proposal due to both the plan design and management practices
that will be established. He noted the Administrative
Committee will be tasked with assessing and recommending
appropriate solutions once more information is known.
Mr. Zaremba presented -information to the Board relative to
staff's recommendations for the Supplemental Retirement Plan
design and management_. He stated in addition to the actuarial
assumptions that all plans must make, there are six primary
variables in the Supplemental Retirement Plan that impact,
liability: the percent payout, length of—payout, number of
annual participants, salary -cap, qualifying experience, and
qualifying age. He further stated after discussions with
School Board staff and feedback from many teachers and other
employees, it was very apparent that the number one variable
they wanted to preserve was the percentage payout. He stated
the value of the benefit remains at 175 percent of final
annual compensations. He further stated school committee
proposal recommended a maximum salary on which the benefit
would be calculated of $135,000. He stated because of recent
turnover and retirements at Chesterfield schools, there are
very few employees who earn more than $100,000; therefore,
county staff worked with the Schools' actuary and staff to
have proposals run at a cap of $95,000. He further stated
since a salary cap alone would not reduce future liability to
desired levels, the service requirement of 15 years was
increased to 20 years and the minimum age to retire and
access this benefit was increased to age 55. He stated the
proposed changes will maintain the fiscal integrity and long-
term sustainability of the plan and help protect the county's
AAA bond rating, as well as adopt the best management
practices on the governance of a public pension plan. He then
suggested the following recommendations, the formation of the
Administrative Committee, designed to review and ensure plan
compliance; monitor investment trust - performance; and ensure
that actuarial reports and other requirements are done
accurately and in a timely manner. He stated the
Administrative- Committee will be a joint county -school
committee consisting of three representatives selected by the
School Superintendent and three representatives selected by
Dr. Casey. He noted openings may be filled by employees,
retirees, or citizens with technical expertise on pensions,
investments and banking. He stated there will be an amendment
to the county's financial policies which will document the
county's commitment to making annual required contributions
16-776
04/26/17
and will specify when payments will be made to each of the.
defined benefits plans. In closing, he stated staff believes
the changes detailed in the presentation will position the
Schools' SRP to be financially sustainable while
demonstrating continued support for the hardworking,
dedicated employees of the school system.
In regards to the formation of the Administrative Committee,
Dr. Casey expressed appreciation to citizens and school
employees for their valuable input relative to the plan. He
noted the added slot to the Administrative Committee will be
filled by someone with expertise on investments and banking.
He then clarified the revision to Section 5.4 regarding the
Administrative Committee.
In response to Mr. Holland's question regarding qualifying
experience, Mr. Zaremba stated he does not know the
percentage of career switchers who are enrolled with
Chesterfield County Public Schools.. He further stated
changing the amount of experience required and the age were
the two factors that moved the liability the most.
Mr. Winslow expressed his appreciation to Dr. Casey, county
staff including Mr. Carmody, Mr. Zaremba, Mr. Harris and his
staff for their diligence and work on such an important and
difficult issue. He stated the Supplemental Retirement Plan
was not' properly authorized and has been chronically and
woefully underfunded resulting in an approximate $100 million
shortfall. He.further stated the issue is how the county is
fulfilling the purpose and intent of the SRP for those
depending on it as a supplemental part of; their retirement
while not jeopardizing the county's longstanding excellent
credit. He stated the formula for a sustainable and viable
SRP is to be legal, honor the promise made to the largest
number of school employees possible to the greatest extent
possible and safeguard the county's triple AAA bond rating,
and contain internal provisions requiring both the budgeting
and the funding of the amounts recommended by the plan's
actuary. He further stated Dr. Casey's revised proposal
protects teachers by making the SRP sustainable; it protects
principals to the largest degree reasonably possible; and
most importantly, it protects the public trust.
Mr. Holland stated his intent to disclose that his wife
retired from the school system, completed her SRP year of
service, and'is vested in receiving SRP benefits under the
current Supplemental Retirement Plan. He further stated
nothing done today by the Board affects her benefits;
however, he wanted to make a disclosure and assure the public
that he can participate in the SRP item fairly, objectively
and in the public interest. He stressed the importance of the
county maintaining the triple AAA bond rating. He stated he
would not approve any plan without the appropriate oversight
and believes the proposed revision further strengthens that
notion. He further stated he reviewed extensively the
financial aspect, potential liability, and the related impact
relative to the Supplemental Retirement Plan. He stated he
intends to support the plan, as presented, and vowed to
ensure the plan remains sustainable going forward.
16-777
04/26/17
1
Ms. Haley stated the existing Supplemental Retirement Plan
was in significant jeopardy. She further stated the Board's
commitment was to bring forth a plan that creates security
and maintains fiscal responsibility and integrity to
employees and county citizens. She reassured the audience
that their voices have been heard and their input was taken'
into serious consideration. She expressed her appreciation
and commended county and school staff for their hard work and
determination relative to the plan. She stated she completely
supports the plan, as amended.
Mr. Elswick stated it is the Board's financial obligation to
county citizens and employees to govern responsibly. He
stressed the importance of maintaining the county's AAA bond'
rating and creating a plan that offers the lowest level of
hazard and minimizes impacts. He stated the proposal is
reasonable and will allow the school system to operate it. in
a fiscally appropriate way. He .stressed the importance of
having both entities work closely together on county issues
going forward.
Ms. Jaeckle stated even though the amended plan does increase
the liability, she felt it was worth the' risk to accommodate
the next wave of employees. She further stated the existing
plan is an example of how boards should not create weak
policies and establish future benefits that may impose
decisions on future boards. She stated the current Board has
made it a practice to stay within financial means and not
allow future boards to face unfunded liabilities, whether -it
is pensions, deferred maintenance, or infrastructure. She
further stated although the Board's decision about the SRP
liability is disappointing to some, -the solution allows the
bulk of SRP recipients to have promises kept and maintains
the county's AAA bond rating.
On motion of Ms. Haley, seconded by Mr. Winslow, the Board
approved the School Board Supplemental Retirement Plan, as
amended.
(It is noted a copy of the School Board Supplemental
Retirement Plan is filed with the papers of this Board.)
Ayes: Jaeckle, Haley, Winslow, Holland and Elswick.
Nays: None.
12.C. BUDGET ITEMS.
Mr. Harris provided a brief presentation summarizing the
budgetary recommendations presented in the budget work
session.
In response to Mr. Winslow's question regarding Police
funding, Mr. Harris stated additional funding for Police
recruitment closes the gap historically with Henrico County
and places the county in a very tight competitive place with
Hanover County and the state.
Mr. Winslow voiced his support of the line item.
In response to Mr. Elswick's question
Shelter, Mr. Harris stated splitting up
sequencing will accelerate the project.
16-778
regarding the Animal
some of the design
04/26/17
Discussion ensued relative to authorizing staff to fund the
renovation and design of the Animal Shelter.
Mr. Elswick requested the Board to approve an amendment to
the FY2017 CIP, with adoption, to transfer and appropriate
sufficient funds to the to the Animal Shelter project to
begin engineering and design during FY2018.
In response to Mr. Elswick's question regarding the School
Board Supplemental Retirement Plan, Mr. Harris stated a
considerable portion of school surplus was held on deposit at
year end as overall county fund balance.
12.C.1. ADOPTION OF ORDINANCE AMENDMENTS TO THE COUNTY CODE
RELATING TO UTILITIES USER CHARGES
On motion of Mr. Holland, seconded by Ms. Haley, the Board
adopted the following ordinance:
AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE CODE OF THE COUNTY
OF CHESTERFIELD, 1997, AS AMENDED, BY AMENDING AND
RE-ENACTING SECTION 18-27 RELATING TO UTILITIES USER CHARGES
BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield
County:
(1) That Section 18-27 of
Chesterfield, 1997, as amended,
read as follows:
Sec. 18-27. Utility charges.
the Code of the County of
are amended and re-enacted to
Effective with bills issued on and after July 1, 2017, the
consumer shall pay charges for utility service in accordance
with the following schedules:
(a) Monthly service charges. The monthly service charge
shall be:
(1) Customer cost charge. A -customer cost charge of
$2.54 for each service account. However, customers
who have only a water account or a wastewater account
shall pay a customer cost charge of $5.08.
(2) Commodity cost charge.
(i) Water: $1.88 per 100 cubic feet (Ccf).
(ii) Wastewater: $ 2.15 per 100 cubic feet (Ccf).
(3) Capacity cost charge.
16-779
04/26/17
Customer Class
Meter
Number
Monthly Capacity
Size
of ERU's
Charge
(inches)
per Unit
Water
Wastewa
r'
(i)
Dwelling, single-
5/8
1.00
$ 7.64
$ 14.
LS,
family, including
townhouses and mobile
homes that are not
located in a mobile
home park
Dwelling, two-family
5/8
1.00
7.64
14
5
(per unit)
Mobile homes that are
0.85
6.49
12
3
located in a mobile
16-779
04/26/17
(b) Ancillary charges.
Type
Charge
home park and multiple -
0 0 0
(5)
Strong waste surcharge
BOD Surcharge Rate (RBOD) _ $0.23
family dwellings other
per pound
TSS Surcharge Rate (RTSS) _ $0.21
than multiple -family
per pound
TN Surcharge Rate (RTN) = $1.56
dwellings used
per pound
TP Surcharge Rate (RTP) _ $4.82
exclusively as housing
per pound
(6)
Septage dumping charge
$50.00 per 1,000 gallons
for colleges or
universities (per unit)
(
)
All other customer
5/8.and
1.00
7.64
14.15
classes
1
2.50
19.10
35.38
1 1/2
5.00
38.20
70.75
2
8.00
61.12
113.20
3
16.00
122.24
226.40
4
25.00
1-91.00
353.75
6
50.00
382.00
707.50
8
80.00
611.20
1,132.00
10
115.00
878.60
1,627.25
12
155.00
1,184.20
2,193.25
(
The capacity cost charge for a dwelling that is served by a meter
that is larger than five-eighths inch shall be the capacity cost
charge in subsection (a) (3) (iv) .
(b) Ancillary charges.
. . .
(2) That this ordinance shall become effective July 1, 2017.
Ayes: Jaeckle, Haley, Winslow, Holland and Elswick.
Nays: None.
12.C.2. ADOPTION OF ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING THE ANNUAL TAX
LEVY ON VARIOUS CLASSES OF REAL ESTATE AND PERSONAL
PROPERTY FOR CALENDAR YEAR 2017
On motion of Mr. Holland, seconded by Ms. Haley, the Board
adopted the following ordinance:
16-780
04/26/17
Type
Charge
0 0 0
(5)
Strong waste surcharge
BOD Surcharge Rate (RBOD) _ $0.23
per pound
TSS Surcharge Rate (RTSS) _ $0.21
per pound
TN Surcharge Rate (RTN) = $1.56
per pound
TP Surcharge Rate (RTP) _ $4.82
per pound
(6)
Septage dumping charge
$50.00 per 1,000 gallons
. . .
(2) That this ordinance shall become effective July 1, 2017.
Ayes: Jaeckle, Haley, Winslow, Holland and Elswick.
Nays: None.
12.C.2. ADOPTION OF ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING THE ANNUAL TAX
LEVY ON VARIOUS CLASSES OF REAL ESTATE AND PERSONAL
PROPERTY FOR CALENDAR YEAR 2017
On motion of Mr. Holland, seconded by Ms. Haley, the Board
adopted the following ordinance:
16-780
04/26/17
AN ORDINANCE TO ESTABLISH THE ANNUAL TAX LEVY
ON VARIOUS CLASSES OF PROPERTY FOR THE
COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD
BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield
County:
(1) That for the year beginning on the first day of January,
2017, and ending on the thirty-first day of December, 2017,
the taxes on property in all the Magisterial Districts of the
County of Chesterfield shall be as follows:
Sec. 1. Real Property and Mobile Homes.
(a) Except as provided in Sec. 1 (b), on tracts of
land, lots or improvements thereon and on mobile homes the
tax shall be $0.96 on every $100 of assessed value thereof.
(b) On tracts of land, lots or improvements thereon and
on mobile homes in the Powhite Parkway -Charter Colony Parkway
Interchange Service District the tax shall be the tax
provided in Sec. 1 (a) plus $0.15 on every $100 of assessed
value thereof.
Sec. 2. Personal Property.
(a) On automobiles, trailers, boats, boat trailers,
other motor vehicles and on all tangible personal property
used or held in connection with any mining, manufacturing or
other business, trade, occupation or profession, including
furnishings, furniture and appliances in rental units, the
tax shall be $3.60 on every $100 of the assessed value
thereof.
(b) On aircraft as defined by Section 58.1-3503 and
-3506 of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended, the tax
shall be $.50 on every $100 of the assessed value thereof.
(c) On motor vehicles owned or leased by members of
volunteer rescue squads, volunteer fire departments,
volunteer police chaplains and by auxiliary police officers
as provided in Section 9-57, Code of the County of
Chesterfield, 1997, as amended, the tax shall be $.96 on
every $100 of the assessed value thereof.
(d) On wild or exotic animals as defined by Section
58.1-3506 of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended, the tax
shall be $0.01 on every $100 of the assessed value thereof.
(e) On motor vehicles which use clean special fuels as
defined in Section 46.2-749.3 of the Code of Virginia, 1950,
as amended, the tax shall be $3.24 on every $100 of the
assessed value thereof.
(f) On motor vehicles, trailers, and semitrailers with
a gross vehicle weight of 10,000 pounds or more used to
transport property for hire by a motor carrier engaged in
interstate commerce, the tax shall be $.96 on every $100 of
the assessed value thereof.
(g) On motor vehicles which are specially equipped to
provide transportation for physically handicapped
individuals, the tax shall be $.01 on every $100 of the
assessed value thereof.
Sec. 3. Public Service Corporation Property.
(a) On that portion of real estate and tangible
personal property of public service corporations which has
been equalized as provided in Section 58.1-2604 of the Code
of Virginia, 1950, as amended, the tax shall be $0.96 on
16-781
04/26/17
every $100 of the assessed value thereof determined by the
State Corporation Commission.
(b) The foregoing subsections to the contrary
notwithstanding, on automobiles and trucks belonging to such
public service corporations the tax shall be $3.60 on every
$100 of assessed value thereof.
Sec. 4. Machinery and Tools.
On machinery and tools used in a manufacturing or mining
business the tax shall be $1.00 on every $100 assessed value
thereof.
Ayes: Jaeckle, Haley, Winslow, Holland and Elswick.
Nays: None.
12.C.3. ADOPTION OF THE FY2018 ANNUAL FINANCIAL PLAN,
FY2018-2022 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN, FY2018
APPROPRIATIONS RESOLUTION, AND THE FY2018 COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT AND THE HOME INVESTMENT
PARTNERSHIP ANNUAL PLAN
On motion of Mr. Holland, seconded by Ms. Haley, the Board
adopted the FY2018 Annual Financial Plan, as amended, to
include Mr. Elswick's request to approve an amendment to the
FY2017 CIP, with adoption, to transfer and appropriate
sufficient funds to the Animal Shelter project to begin
engineering and design during FY2018, FY2018-2022 Capital
Improvement Plan, and the FY2018 Community Development Block
Grant and the HOME Investment Partnership Annual Plan.
And, further, the Board adopted the following resolution
appropriating funds for FY2018,-as amended:
RESOLUTION TO APPROPRIATE DESIGNATED FUNDS AND ACCOUNTS FROM DESIGNATED
ESTIMATED REVENUES FOR FY2018 FOR THE OPERATING BUDGETS AND THE CAPITAL
IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FOR THE COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD, VIRGINIA
BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of the County of
Chesterfield:
That for the fiscal year beginning on the first day of July 2017 and
ending on the thirtieth day of June 2018, the'following sections shall be
adopted:
Sec. 1 The following designated funds and accounts shall be appropriated
from the designated estimated revenues for operations and to
provide a capital improvement program for the County. It is the
intent of the Board of Supervisors that general property taxes
levied on January 1, 2017, and due December 5, 2017, be
appropriated for FY2018. These appropriations will be made with
revenues projected with a $.96 real estate tax rate for calendar
year 2017. _
FY2018
General Fund Adopted
Estimated Revenue:; Local Sources
General Property Taxes $432,322,500
Other Local Taxes 119,698,800
Licenses, Permits, & Fees 7,071,100
Fines, Forfeitures & Uses of Money &
Property 3,332,700
Service Charges 12,784,600
Miscellaneous and Recovered Costs 5,752,200
Other Agencies
State and Federal 144,074,600
Other Financing Sources
Use of Restricted, Committed, or
Assigned Fund Balance 15,181,700
Transfer from County Grants Fund 1,447,900
Transfer from Mental Health, Support 446,900
16-782
04/26/17
Services
Transfer from Fleet Management
7
200
Transfer from Water Operating Fund
1
900
Transfer from Wastewater Operating
Fund
1
300
Total Revenues
$742,123
400
Appropriations:
General Government
$56,269,300
Administration of Justice
9,411,00,f-'
Public Safety
171,898,71?
J
Public Works
18,533
500
Health & Welfare
29,229,200
Parks, Recreation, Cultural
21,684,200
Community Development
21,346,200
Debt Service
24,257,300
Operating Transfers
388,881,600
Assignments
612,400
Total General Fund
$742,123,400
Comprehensive Services
Fund
Estimated Revenue:
Reimbursement, Colonial Heights
$469,500
State Aid, Comprehensive Services
8,663,900
Transfer from Social Services
445,200
Transfer from Schools
3,637,600
Transfer from General Fund
1,922,600
Use of Unrestricted Net Assets
556,000
Total Revenues and Funding Sources
$15,694,800
Appropriations:
Operating Expenses
$14,973,600
Addition to.Unrestricted Net Assets
7211200__,
Total Appropriations
$15;694,8f
School Operating Fund
Estimated Revenue:
Local Sources
$20,223,200
State
268,743,500
Federal
37,893,940
Transfer from School CIP
74,000
Transfer from School Operating
450,400
Transfer from School Food Service
700,000
Use of Reserve
4,097,060
Transfer from General Fund:
State Sales Tax
63,219,400
Local Taxes
266,007,200
Prior Year Revenue
7,036,600
Total General Fund
336,263,200
Use of Assigned Fund Balance
1,000,000
Total Revenues and Funding Sources
$669,445,300
Appropriations:
Instruction
$465,370,134
Administration, Attendance & Health
20,776,870
Pupil Transportation
34,627,609
Operations & Maintenance
48,121,136
Technology
12,965,503_
Debt Service
50,293151;
Food Service
26,998,1,'.
Transfer to and/or Assignment for School
Capital Projects
9,292,400
Unassigned Fund Balance, 6/30/2018
1,000,000
Total Appropriations
$669,445,300
Schools - Appomattox Regional Governor's School Fund
Estimated Revenue:
Local Sources
$2,587,800
State
1,321,800
Total Revenues and Funding Sources
$3,909,600
16-783
04/26/17
Appropriations
Education 3,909,600
Total Appropriations $3,909,600
County Grants Fund
Estimated Revenue: Other Governments $12,387,300
Transfer from General Fund 1,334,300
Use of Restricted, Committed, or
Assigned Fund Balance 21,200
Total Revenues and Funding Sources $13,742,800
Appropriations: Adult and Juvenile Drug Courts
$972,200
Community Development Block Grant/HOME
1,592,600
Domestic Violence Prosecutor
84,900
Domestic Violence Victim.Advocate (V -
STOP)
60,400
Mental Health Support Services Grants
2,510,700
Fire and EMS Revenue Recovery
6,520,000
Police Grants
64,800
Technology Trust Fund
215,400
USDA Grant - Juvenile Detention Home
65,000
Victim/Witness Assistance
764,800
Virginia Juvenile Community Crime
Control Act (VJCCCA)
892,000
Total Appropriations
$13,742,800
County CIP Fund
Estimated Revenue: Transfer from General Fund $28,404,000
General Obligation Bonds 12,900,000
Lease Financing 8,100,000
Developer Contributions/Interest
Earnings 7,713,200
Transfer from Cash Proffers_ 513,200
State Funds 10,000,000
Total Revenues $67,630,400
Appropriations: County Capital Projects $59,917,200
Transfer to Capital Projects from Cash
Proffers 7,713,200
Total County CIP Funds $67,630,400
Note: An additional $2,209,793 in county
project savings is already appropriated
in the capital project fund that will be
reallocated for new projects.
Schools CIP Fund
Estimated Revenue: Bond Proceeds $64,924,500
Interest Earnings 74,000
Transfer from Cash Proffer Fund 7,200,000
Trf from School Grant Fund (State
Technology Funds) 1,800,000
Transfer from School Food Service 484,000
Transfer from School Reserve for Future
Capital Projects 7,008,400
Total Revenue and Transfers $81,490,900
Appropriations: School Capital Projects $81,416,900
Transfer to School Operating Fund 74,000
Total Appropriations $81,490,900
Fleet Management and Radio Shop
Estimated Revenue: Fleet Management Charges $18,092,300
Radio Shop Charges 2,058,500
Total Revenue and Funding Sources $20,150,800
16-784
04/26/17
Appropriations: Fleet Management Operations
Radio Shop Operations
Addition to Unrestricted Net Assets
Total Appropriations
Risk Management Fund
Estimated Revenue:
Appropriations:
Healthcare Fund
Estimated Revenue:
Appropriations:
Airport Fund
Estimated Revenue:
Appropriations:
Utilities Funds
Estimated Revenue
Appropriations
Utilities Capital
Project Funds
Estimated Revenue:
Appropriations:
Stormwater Utility
Fund
Estimated Revenue:
Appropriations:
Operating Revenues
Total Revenue
Risk Management Operations
Total Appropriations
Employee Contributions
Employer Contributions
Total Revenue
Operating Expenditures
Total Appropriations
Operating Revenue
State and Federal
Lease Financing
Total Revenue
Airport Operations and Capital Projects
Total Appropriations
Service Charges
Capital Cost Recovery Charges
Other
Use of Unrestricted Net Assets
Total Revenue
Operations
Debt Service
Transfer to Capital Projects Fund
Total Appropriations
Transfer from Improvement/Replacement
Fund
Total Revenue
Capital Projects
Total Appropriations
Transfer from Improvement/Replacement
Fund
Total Revenue
Operating Expenses
Total Appropriations °
Note: $1,987,100 in existing
appropriations will also be used to fund
FY2018 projects.
$17,704,000
2,058,500
388,300
$.20,150,800
$9,339,000
$9,339,000_
t
i
$9, 339, 0(11- /
$9,339,000
$31,195,400
82,304,600
$113,500,000
$113,500,000
$113,500,000
$753,700
200,000
1,800,000
$2,753,700
$2,753,700
$2,753,700
$93,700,000
19,291,000
4,648,200
57,904,300
$175,543,500
$61,854,200
6,990,400
106,698,900
$175,543,500
$106,698,900
$106,698,900
$106,698,900
$106,698,900_
$5,967,400
$5,967,400
$5,967,400
$5,967,400
16-785
04/26/17
Mental Health Support
Services
Estimated Revenue: State $5,019,500
Federal _ 907,400
Other Revenue 21,899,200
Transfer from GF 11,873,000
Total Revenue $39,699,100
Appropriations: Operating Expenses $38,860,100
Transfer to General Fund 446,900
Transfer to Grants 392,100
Total Appropriations $39,699,100
Sec. 2 Subsequent to the appropriations outlined in section 1, the Board
of Supervisors may make additional appropriations if there is an
unencumbered and unappropriated sum sufficient to appropriate.
Sec. 3 The County Administrator may increase appropriations for non -
budgeted revenue that may occur during the fiscal year as
follows: insurance recoveries of -any amount received for damage
to any County property, including vehicles, for which County
funds have been expended; refunds or reimbursements, in any
amount, made to the County for which the County has expended
funds directly related to that refund or reimbursement; and other
revenue not to exceed $50,000.
Budget Change Requests are required when transferring funds
between appropriation categories and capital projects, when
appropriating revenue and expenditures, or when using a reserve.
Approval levels below the County Administrator's $50,000
threshold is delegated at the following increments: $0-10,000
Budget and Management Analyst, $10,001-20,000 Budget and
Management Director, $20,001-50,000 County Administrator. Any
budget change request above $50,000 will be taken to the Board of
Supervisors for approval.
Sec. 4 The County Administrator -, in concert with the Board of
Supervisors - may increase the general fund transfer to schools
and make appropriations in the school operating fund, contingent
upon availability of funds and other circumstances, based on the
following schedule: $3 million on December 15, $3 million on
February 15, and $3 million on May S. Upon completion of the
FY2017 audit, the County Administrator may transfer and
appropriate up to $3 million in the Mental Health Fund to
establish a fund balance.
Sec. 5 - The County Administrator may, as provided herein, authorize the
transfer of any unencumbered balance or portion thereof from one
classification of expenditure to another within the same
department or appropriation category. Unless otherwise provided
below, the County Administrator may transfer up to $50,000 from
the unencumbered appropriated balance and prior year end carry
forward assignments from one appropriation category (including
assigned fund balance) to another appropriation category or
between capital projects. No more than one transfer may be made
for the same item unless the total amount to be transferred for
the item does not exceed $50,000.
The School Board or School Superintendent may make revenue- and
expenditure transfers among school appropriations categories or
between capital projects during the fiscal year with approval
delegated, in aggregate, in the following increments: $0-50,000
Superintendent, $50,001-499,999 School Board, $500,000+ Board of
Supervisors. The School Board and/or the School Superintendent
shall prepare a budget status report reflecting changes to the
approved school budget between appropriation categories or
capital projects, as amended, and present it to the County
Administrator quarterly.
Sec. 6 The County Administrator may approve transfers among County and
Utility funds to enable the capital projects or grants to be
accounted for correctly as long as funding sources are consistent
16-786
04/26/17
and total appropriation is not increased. The County
Administrator is authorized to reallocate funding sources for
capital projects, cash proffers, and debt service payments. Upon
completion of a capital project or grant program, staff is
authorized to close out the project and transfer any remaining
balances to the original funding source. Savings in projects
initiated as part of a major maintenance program are authorized
to be transferred to the corresponding major maintenance account
for future improvements. Staff is authorized to reprogram
Community Development Block Grant funds by closing program cost
centers and transferring funding to newly approved programs based
on adoption by the Board of Supervisors. If outside contributions
or external revenues do not materialize at the level budgeted,
the County Administrator may reduce revenue and expenditure
appropriations to the level received.
The School Superintendent is authorized to reallocate funding
sources for capital projects as long as funding sources are
consistent and total appropriation is not increased. Upon
completion of a capital project or grant program, staff is
authorized to close out the project and transfer any remaining
balances to the original funding source or the Reserve for Future
Projects. Savings in projects initiated as part of a major
maintenance or food services program are authorized to be
transferred to the corresponding major maintenance or food
services account for future improvements. If outside
contributions or external revenues do not materialize at the
level budgeted, the School Superintendent may reduce revenue and
expenditure appropriations to the level received.
Sec. 7 The County Administrator is authorized to transfer among
appropriation categories and/or appropriate funds and assignments
of fund balance in any amount for supplemental retirement,
Workers' Compensation, healthcare, and other compensation -related
costs, as well as for transfers to departments to cover
energy/fuel costs, and funds received from asset forfeitures for
allowable expenditures. Within the healthcare fund, the County
Administrator is authorized to appropriate use of reserves,
interest earnings, and additional employee - or employer
contributions in any amount to pay claims, deductables,
settlements, and any costs associated with_ healthcare.
Sec. 8 All outstanding encumbrances, both operating and capital, in all
County funds up to $150 million, at June 30, 2107 shall be an
amendment to the adopted budget and shall be reappropriated to
the next fiscal year to the same department for which they were
assigned in the previous year. At the close of the fiscal year,
all unassigned appropriations lapse for budget items other than:
those contained in life -to -date funds, budgeted general fund
transfers to life -to -date funds; other use of restricted,
committed, or assigned fund balances; District Improvement Funds;
asset forfeiture funds; grant funds; construction assignments;
assignments for County and School reserves for future capital
improvements; donations received for specific purposes; tax
revenues received for special assessment districts and interest
earnings thereon; Fire and Emergency Medical Services apparatus
and equipment funding; General Services vehicle and equipment
funding; Economic Development incentive funds; and refunds for
off-site and oversized water and wastewater facilities.
Sec. 9 Any funds specifically budgeted to add to an assignment of fund
balance shall be automatically assigned during the year end audit
process. All excess revenues and unspent appropriations in the
telecommunications program is authorized to be automaticly
assigned for future telecommunications upgrades. All excess
revenues in the BPOL program is authorized to be reserved for
future transportation or economic development initiatives. All
revenues from the increased vehicle registration fee received in
excess of those budgeted for the state revenue sharing program
shall be authorized to be reserved for future tranportation
improvements. Any revenues received from the sale of real
property to satisfy delinquent taxes is authorized to be reserved
at year end. Staff is authorized to transfer and appropriate up
to $937,000 from results at year end into the Stormwater Fund for
TMDL related expenses.
16-787
04/26/17
Sec. 10 The County Administrator is authorized to make expenditures from
Trust & Agency Funds for the specified reasons for which the
funds were established. In no case shall the expenditure exceed
the available balance in the fund.
Sec. 11 In accordance with the requirements set forth in Section 58.1-
3524(C)(2) and Section 58.1-3912(E) of the Code of Virginia, as
amended by Chapter 1 of the Acts of Assembly (2004 Special
Session 1) and as set forth in Item 503.E (Personal Property Tax
Relief Program) of Chapter 951 of the 2005 Acts of Assembly, any
qualifying vehicle situated within the County, shall receive
personal property tax relief in the following manner:
a) Personal use vehicles valued at $1,000 or less will be
eligible for 100% tax relief;
b) Personal use vehicles valued at $1,001 to $20,000 will be
eligible for 55% tax relief;
c) Personal use vehicles valued at $20,001 or more shall receive
55% tax relief on the first $20,000 of value;
d) All other vehicles which do not meet the definition of
"qualifying" (business use vehicles, farm use vehicles, motor
homes, etc.) will not be eligible for any form "of tax relief
under this program. Pursuant to authority conferred in Item
503.D of the 2005 State Appropriations Act, the County
Treasurer_ shall issue a supplemental personal property tax
bill in the amount of 100 percent of tax.due without regard to
any former entitlement to state PPTRA relief, plus applicable
penalties and interest, to any taxpayer whose taxes with
respect to a qualifying vehicle for tax year "2005 or any prior
tax year remain unpaid on September 1," 2006, or such date as
state funds for reimbursement of the state share of such bill
have become unavailable, whichever occurs first.
e) Penalty and interest with respect to bills issued pursuant to
this section shall be. computed on the entire amount" of tax
owed. Interest shall be computed at the rate provided in
Section 9-51 of the County code from the original due date of
the tax.
Sec. 1-2 The County Administrator is authorized to assign position
numbers from the Board approved unallocated pool to a specific
department as long as there is sufficient funding appropriated
to cover the personnel costs. No new full-time position
numbers can be created without Board of Supervisor approval.
Sec. 13 The County Administrator, on behalf of the Board of
Supervisors, will ensure that the payment amounts for
defined benefit pension plans for each liability is funded and
paid annually. The County Administrator is authorized to
withhold and adjust general fund contributions to other funds
to make pension plan payments for the respective funds if not
paid on the policy established timeline as applicable.
Ayes: Jaeckle, Haley, Winslow, Holland and Elswick.
Nays: None.
12.D. CONSENT ITEMS
12.D.1. ADOPTION OF RESOLUTIONS
12.D.1.a. RECOGNIZING "NATIONAL LAW ENFORCEMENT WEEK" IN
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
On motion of Mr. Winslow, seconded by Mr. Holland, the Board
adopted the following resolution:
WHEREAS, one of Chesterfield County's five strategic
goals is "to partner with residents to provide a safe and
secure community through prevention, readiness,_ and
professional response and
16-788
04/26/17
WHEREAS, no community goal is more precious and vital
than maintaining the safety of family, self and others we
hold dear; and
WHEREAS, the dedication, steadfastness and bravery of
our law enforcement teams that operate in Chesterfield County
are well known as they provide essential services_ to all
community members; and
WHEREAS, this service, provided 24 hours a day and 365
days a year, is the keystone upon which our quality of life
rests; and
WHEREAS, since the first known line -of -duty death in
1791, over 20,000 law enforcement officers have made the
ultimate sacrifice; on average one officer dies in the line
of duty every 61 hours and as such, there are more than
20,000 names engraved on the walls of the National Law
Enforcement Officers Memorial; and
WHEREAS, in 1962, President John F. Kennedy signed a
proclamation which designated May 15th as Peace Officers
Memorial Day, and the week in which that date fell as Police
Week; and that week is now recognized across the country as
National Law Enforcement Week, honoring the national law
enforcement officers who gave their lives in the line of duty
during the previous year; and
WHEREAS, Chesterfield County is grateful and honored to
have such outstanding and professional individuals serving as
law enforcement officers to protect the health, safety, and
welfare of its community.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chesterfield
County Board of Supervisors hereby recognizes the week during
which May 15th falls as "National Law Enforcement Week" in
Chesterfield County and calls this recognition to the
attention of all its community members, as well as publicly
salutes the service of law enforcement officers in our
community.
Ayes: Jaeckle, Haley, Winslow, Holland and Elswick.
Nays: None.
12.D.1.b. RECOGNIZING THE THIRD WEEK IN MAY AS "EMERGENCY
MEDICAL SERVICES WEEK" IN CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
On motion of Mr. Winslow, seconded by Mr. Holland, the Board
adopted the following resolution:
WHEREAS, providing emergency medical services is a vital
public function; and
WHEREAS, the members of emergency medical services are
ready to provide high quality lifesaving care to those in
need twenty-four hours a day, seven days a week; and
WHEREAS, immediate access to high quality emergency care
dramatically improves the survival and recovery rate of those
who experience sudden illness or injury; and
16-789
04/26/17
WHEREAS, injury prevention and the appropriate use of
the EMS system will help reduce national health care costs;
and
WHEREAS, the emergency medical service is comprised of
emergency physicians, emergency nurses, emergency medical
technicians, paramedics, firefighters, communications
officers, educators, administrators and others; and
WHEREAS, working _together, , Chesterfield County's
emergency crews responds to more than 30,000 medical
emergencies- annually, representing countless hours of
dedicated service to the community; and
WHEREAS, the members of emergency medical, services,
whether career or volunteer, engage in many hours of
specialized training and continuing education to enhance
their lifesaving skills; and
WHEREAS, the residents and guests of Chesterfield County
benefit daily from the knowledge, skills, and dedication of
these highly trained individuals; and
WHEREAS, it is appropriate to recognize the value and
the accomplishments of the emergency medical services
providers from Chesterfield Fire and EMS, DLA Richmond Fire
and Emergency Services, Chesterfield County's Emergency
Communications Center, and the volunteer rescue squads of
Bensley -Bermuda, Ettrick-Matoaca, Forest View, and
Manchester.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that- the Chesterfield
County Board of Supervisors recognizes the third week in May
as "Emergency Medical Services Week" in Chesterfield County.
AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that a copy of this
resolution, be permanently recorded among the papers of this
Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County, Virginia.
Ayes: Jaeckle, Haley, Winslow, Holland and Elswick.
Nays: None.
12.D.1.c. RECOGNIZING COUNTY EMPLOYEES UPON THEIR RETIREMENT
12.D.1.c.1. FIREFIGHTER DONALD W. HALL, FIRE AND EMERGENCY
MEDICAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT
On motion of Mr. Winslow, seconded by Mr. Holland, the Board
adopted the following resolution: .
WHEREAS, Firefighter Donald W. Hall retired from the
Chesterfield Fire 'and Emergency Medical Services Department,
Chesterfield County, on April 1, 2017; and
WHEREAS, Firefighter Hall started his career in Recruit
School ##11 in 1981 and has faithfully served the citizens of
Chesterfield County for over 36 years in various assignments
as a firefighter at the Manchester, Ettrick, Wagstaff,
Midlothian, Bon Air, Dale and Matoaca Fire and EMS Stations;
and
16-790
04/26/17
WHEREAS, Firefighter Hall achieved the Emergency Medical
Technician -Cardiac Certification in 1989; and his Nationally
Registered Emergency Medical Technician -Paramedic
Certification in 1992; and
WHEREAS, Firefighter Hall served in the Chesterfield
Fire and EMS Technical Service Unit for 13 years, and the EMS
Med-Flight program with the Virginia State Police Med-Flight
1 program from 2012 to retirement; and
WHEREAS, Firefighter Hall completed the didactic and
practical requirements from the University of Maryland,
Baltimore County Department of Emergency Health Services to
receive his Critical Care Paramedic certificate in 2010; -and
WHEREAS, Firefighter Hall was recognized with two
Emergency Medical Services Awards for his advanced lifesaving
actions for unresponsive patients in December 1991 and in
July 1992; and
WHEREAS, Firefighter Hall was recognized with a Unit
Citation Award for his actions in April 1994 during. a
successful swift water rescue on the Appomattox River of two
patients clinging to a tree; and
WHEREAS, Firefighter Hall was recognized with an EMS
Lifesave Award and Retail Merchants Association Gold Valor
Award for his heroic actions in October 1998 during a motor
vehicle accident on Iron Bridge Road where he administered
lifesaving EMS procedures while a portable fire extinguisher
had to be used to keep fire off the trapped patient; and
WHEREAS, Firefighter Hall was chosen Chesterfield Fire
and EMS Career Firefighter of the Year in 2000, and he
received the Chief's Award in 2006 recognizing his tireless
efforts in the acquisition, design and deployment of the
Chesterfield County Public Safety Mobile Command Center; and
WHEREAS, Firefighter Hall was recognized with two EMS
Unit Citation Awards for providing exemplary teamwork in
caring for a child who fell out of a moving vehicle in 1997
and an adult who jumped from a moving vehicle in 2012; and
WHEREAS, Firefighter Hall was presented the Shining
Knight Award from the Virginia Commonwealth University Health
System Trauma Program for his exemplary patient care during a
Med-Flight response to assist Goochland County Fire Rescue
with a motor vehicle accident involving a motorcycle in April
2015, that resulted in saving a life; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chesterfield
County Board of Supervisors recognizes the contributions of
Firefighter Donald W. Hall, expresses the appreciation of all
citizens for his service to the county, and extends their
appreciation for his dedicated service and congratulations
upon his retirement.
Ayes: Jaeckle, Haley, Winslow, Holland and Elswick.
Nays: None.
16-791
04/26/17
12.D.1.c.2. MR._ DAVID I. HENIN, BUILDING INSPECTION
DEPARTMENT
On motion of Mr. Winslow, seconded by Mr. Holland, the Board
adopted the following resolution:
WHEREAS, Mr. David I. Henin joined Chesterfield County,
Virginia as a Senior Structural Engineer on December 1, 1986;
and
WHEREAS, Mr. Henin_ used his structural expertise to
verify that many of the largest buildings in the county were
correctly engineered; and
WHEREAS, he received recognition for helping develop the
gatekeeping program as well as development and implementation
of residential plan submission policies; and
F
WHEREAS, Mr. Henin-valued continuous learning, which he
exemplified by learning the non-structural life safety
aspects of the code and performing combination plan reviews;
and
WHEREAS, Mr. Henin earned promotions during his career
with the county leading to his promotion to principal
engineer on January 1, 1990; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Henin's work to provide a safe -built
environment in Chesterfield County has greatly enhanced the
well-being of our residents and visitors; and
WHEREAS, he is known for his technical knowledge of the
profession and dedication in seeking opportunitiesto be a
mentor and share his knowledge and experiences with staff
members and the public; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Henin always performed his job with
kindness and compassion for customers and co-workers; and
-WHEREAS, Mr. Henin generously devoted his time, talent
and leadership to service with the Virginia Structural
Engineers Council throughout his career at Chesterfield
County; and
WHEREAS, he faithfully served the county and - its
residents with honor and integrity; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Henin will retire from the Chesterfield
County Department of Building Inspection on May 1, 2017,
after providing more than 30 years of dedicated service.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE. IT RESOLVED that the. Chesterfield
County Board of Supervisors recognizes Mr. David I. Henin for
his contributions to Chesterfield County, the Commonwealth of
Virginia and both the code enforcement and engineering
professions, expresses the appreciation of all residents for
his service to the county, and extends appreciation for his
dedicated service to the Building Inspection Department and
congratulations upon his retirement.
Ayes: Jaeckle, Haley, Winslow, Holland and Elswick.
Nays: None.
16-792
04/26/17
12.D.1.c.3. CORPORAL MATTHEW T. WILLIAMS, POLICE DEPARTMENT
On motion of Mr. Winslow, seconded by Mr. Holland, the Board
adopted the following resolution:
WHEREAS, Corporal Matthew T. Williams will retire from
the Chesterfield County Police Department on May 1, 2017,
after providing over 27 years of outstanding service to the
residents of Chesterfield County; and
WHEREAS, Corporal Williams has faithfully served the
county in the capacity of Patrol Officer, Senior Police
Officer, Master Police Officer, Career Police Officer, Career
Detective and Corporal; and
WHEREAS, during his tenure, Corporal Williams also
served as a Field Training Officer, Breathalyzer Operator,
Patrol Rifle Operator, Community Policing Officer, General
Instructor, Firearms Instructor and Defensive Tactics
Instructor; and
WHEREAS, Corporal Williams has served in various
specialty units, including the Street Drug Enforcement Unit,
Anti -Crime Unit and Tactical Investigations Unit; and
WHEREAS, Corporal Williams received a Unit Citation for
his teamwork in creating and implementing multiple work
process improvements in the'Tactical Investigations Unit that
resulted in a significant increase in the number of cases
cleared, the number of suspects apprehended, and a sizeable
reduction in the overtime hour. expenditures; and
WHEREAS, Corporal Williams was selected for the Retail
Merchants Association Valor Award; and
WHEREAS, Corporal Williams was the recipient of a
Chief's Commendation for placing himself at personal risk
while assisting another officer in subduing and arresting an
intoxicated subject who had displayed a weapon outside a
restaurant/ lounge; a friend of the subject initiated a fight
with Corporal Williams and was also taken into custody, and
due to the quick thinking and actions of both officers, the
situation was deescalated; and
WHEREAS Corporal Williams is an exceptional detective in
the area of surveillance, and his experience, training,
flexibility, knowledge and leadership has been invaluable to
the Covert Operations Section and the Chesterfield County
Police Department; and
WHEREAS, Corporal
communications and human
ethic, and his teamwork,
the Police Department
Chesterfield County in
exemplary career; and
Williams is recognized for his
relations skills, his strong work
all of which he has utilized within
and in assisting residents of
a professional manner during his
WHEREAS, during his tenure, Corporal Williams has
received numerous letters of commendation, thanks and
appreciation for services rendered; and
WHEREAS, Corporal Williams has provided the Chesterfield
County Police Department with many years of loyal and
dedicated service; and
16-793
04/26/17
l
WHEREAS, Chesterfield County and the Board of
Supervisors will miss Corporal Williams' diligent service. -
NOW-, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chesterfield \
County Board of Supervisors recognizes Corporal Matthew T.
Williams and extends on behalf of its members and the
residents of Chesterfield County, appreciation for his
service to the county, congratulations upon his retirement,
and best wishes for a long and happy retirement.
Ayes: Jaeckle, Haley, Winslow, Holland and Elswick.
Nays: None.
12.D.i.c:4. SERGEANT JERRY L. KENNON, JR., POLICE DEPARTMENT
On motion of Mr. Winslow, seconded by Mr. Holland, the Board
adopted the following resolution:
WHEREAS, Sergeant Jerry L. Kennon, Jr. will retire from
the Chesterfield County Police Department on May 1, 2017,
after providing over 27 years .of outstanding quality service
to the residents of Chesterfield County; and
WHEREAS, Sergeant Kennon has faithfully served the
county in the capacity of Patrol Officer, Senior Police
Officer, Master Police Officer, Master Detective, Career
Police Officer, Corporal and Sergeant; and
- WHEREAS, during his tenure, Sergeant Kennon also served
as a Field Training Officer, General Instructor, Breathalyzer
Operator, Patrol Rifle Operator, K-9 Officer and as a member
of the Marine -Patrol; and
WHEREAS, Sergeant. Kennon was recognized with a Chief's
Commendation for distinguishing himself while assisting in
the search for an armed robbery suspect, and his thorough
interview of the suspect and detailed report documentation
was instrumental in the arrest and clearance of this armed
robbery, as well as six other armed robbery cases in the
surrounding jurisdictions; and
WHEREAS, Sergeant Kennon received a.Lifesaving Award for
the quick actions taken by him and his co-worker to prevent
an individual. from committing suicide; the unconscious
victim, who was found hanging in a shed, was lifted enough to
allow Sergeant Kennon to remove the rope from around his
neck, and the victim was placed on the ground where he
regained consciousness; and
WHEREAS, Sergeant Kennon was awarded an Achievement
Award for 'his actions during an extensive, joint FBI
investigation, into a Counterfeit Products/Money Laundering
Operation, and the investigation yielded hundreds of
thousands of dollars in counterfeit products, fake
identifications, ' and illegal documents and resulted in nine
suspects being arrested on 21 felony charges; and
WHEREAS, while serving as a member of the Crimes Against
Persons Unit, Sergeant Kennon was recognized with an
Achievement Award for working tirelessly with his fellow
detectives to identify, arrest and charge a suspect who had
committed a homicide during a carjacking in Chesterfield
County; and
16-794
04/26/17
WHEREAS, Sergeant Kennon has a "lead by example"
attitude, exhibiting the utmost professionalism of a
Chesterfield County police officer, and he has long
established himself as a leader in the law enforcement field,
is a great source of knowledge, and willingly provides
guidance and direction to other officers; and
WHEREAS, Sergeant
communications and human
ethic, and his teamwork,
the Police Department
Chesterfield County in
exemplary career; and
Kennon is recognized for his
relations skills, his strong work
all of which he has utilized within
and in assisting residents of
a professional manner during his
WHEREAS, during his tenure,
numerous letters of commendation,
services rendered; and
Sergeant Kennon has received
thanks and appreciation for
WHEREAS, Sergeant Kennon has provided the Chesterfield
County Police Department with several decades of loyal and
dedicated service; and
WHEREAS, Chesterfield County and the Board of
Supervisors will miss Sergeant Kennon's diligent service.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chesterfield
County Board of Supervisors recognizes Sergeant Jerry L.
Kennon, Jr. and extends on behalf of its members and the
residents of Chesterfield County, appreciation for his
service to the county, congratulations upon his retirement,
and best wishes for a long and happy retirement.
Ayes: Jaeckle, Haley, Winslow, Holland and Elswick.
Nays: None.
12.D.1.c.5. MRS. STELLA A. OLSEN, UTILITIES DEPARTMENT
On motion of Mr. Winslow, seconded. by Mr. Holland, the Board
adopted the following resolution:
WHEREAS,. Mrs. Stella A. Olsen retired from Chesterfield
County Utilities Department on April 1, 2017; and
WHEREAS, in August 1999, Mrs_ Olsen began her public
service with the Chesterfield County Building Inspection
Department, working as a customer service representative
assisting homeowners and contractors with acquiring permits
and scheduling inspections; and
WHEREAS, in 2001, Mrs. Olsen was promoted while working
for the Building Inspection Department to a citizens
assistance and code compliance coordinator handling citizen
complaints and processing the associated paperwork with the
Citizens Assistance Program; and
WHEREAS, in March 2002, Mrs. Olsen began working with
the Department of Utilities where she served as the secretary
for the Utilities Construction -Inspection Section until her
retirement; and
WHEREAS, Mrs. Olsen was a front-line employee who
proactively developed her administrative, customer service,
and technical skills using classroom and online educational
opportunities, and successfully integrated what she learned
into her job duties; and
16-795
04/26/17
WHEREAS, Mrs. Olsen has always worked diligently to
ensure customers' needs were met in a timely and professional
manner; and
WHEREAS, Mrs. Olsen has displayed a cooperative and
willing attitude whenever her assistance was requested, even
if the tasks required learning new skills and procedures she
was not familiar with; and
WHEREAS, throughout her career with Chesterfield County,
Mrs.. Olsen displayed dependability, good character .and
adhered vigilantly to the Chesterfield County Code of Ethics.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chesterfield
County Board of Supervisors recognizes Mrs. Stella A. Olsen
and extends on behalf of its members and the citizens of
Chesterfield County, appreciation for over 17 years of
exceptional service to the county.
Ayes: Jaeckle, Haley, Winslow, Holland and Elswick.
Nays: None.
12.D.1.d. RECOGNIZING MR. CONNOR WEST UPON ATTAINING THE
RANK OF EAGLE SCOUT
On motion of Mr. Winslow, seconded by Mr. Holland, the Board
adopted the following resolution:
WHEREAS, the Boy Scouts of Americawas incorporated by
Mr. William D. Boyce on February 8, 1910, and was chartered
by Congress in 1916; and
WHEREAS, the Boy Scouts of America was founded to build
character, provide citizenship training and promote physical
fitness; and
WHEREAS, after earning at least twenty-one merit badges
in a wide variety of skills including leadership, service and
outdoor life, serving in a leadership position in a troop,
carrying out a service project beneficial to his community,
being active in the troop, demonstrating Scout spirit, and
living up to the Scout Oath and Law, Mr. Connor West, Troop
819, sponsored by Saint John's Episcopal Church-, has
accomplished those high standards of commitment and has
reached the long -sought goal of Eagle Scout, which is
received by only four percent of those individuals entering
the Scouting movement; and
WHEREAS, growing. through his experiences in Scouting,
learning the lessons of responsible citizenship, and
endeavoring to -prepare himself for a role as a leader in
society, Connor has distinguished himself as a member of a
new generation of prepared young citizens of whom we,can all
be very proud.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chesterfield
County Board of Supervisors recognizes Mr. Connor West,
extends congratulations on his attainment of Eagle Scout, and
acknowledges the good fortune of the county to have such 'an
outstanding young man as its citizen.
Ayes: Jaeckle, Haley, Winslow, Holland and Elswick.
Nays: None.
16-796
04/26/17
12.D.1.e. RECOGNIZING SMART BEGINNINGS GREATER RICHMOND AND
THE LAUNCH OF THE REGIONAL PLAN FOR SCHOOL
READINESS 2017-2020
On motion of Mr. Winslow, seconded by Mr. Holland, the Board
adopted the following resolution:
WHEREAS, in the earliest years, from birth through age
five, children rapidly absorb information, their brains
developing at an exponential rate unmatched in any other
period of life; and
WHEREAS, providing infants and young children with
supportive, nurturing relationships and enriching
environments during this critical phase of development helps
put them on a path to success in later years; and
WHEREAS, investing in children's early development and
school readiness reaps returns across different sectors -
workforce, health care, education, public safety, and
business - resulting in a human capital investment strategy
proven to improve lives and encourage economic growth for the_
Richmond region; and
WHEREAS, quality early childhood services can reduce
socio-economic and health disparities between children of
different backgrounds and provide a stronger foundation for a
healthy start; and
WHEREAS, there are nearly 24,000 children in
Chesterfield County from birth to five -years old, and 72.8
percent of the parents of those children are in the labor
force; and
WHEREAS, the Smart Beginnings Greater Richmond
partnership of more than 110 organizations has raised
awareness about the importance of the early years and
leveraged resources and organizing power to create more
opportunities for families to support a healthy start for
their children; and
WHEREAS, numerous partner organizations in Chesterfield
County contributed to the Regional Plan for.School Readiness
2017-2020, including Chesterfield County Public Schools,
Chesterfield County Public Library, Chesterfield County
Mental _Health Support Services, Chesterfield County Youth
Planning and Development, Chesterfield -Colonial Heights
Families First, Chesterfield Health District, and
Chesterfield -Colonial Heights Social Services; and
WHEREAS, the Regional Plan for School Readiness 2017-
2020 builds on the premise that a strong start for children
of all incomes is good for the economic vitality and well-
being of Chesterfield County and the region; and
WHEREAS, the Regional Plan for School Readiness 2017-
2020 is inspired by the vision that all children from birth
through five in the Richmond region will be healthy, well -
cared for, and ready to succeed,in school, work and in life.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chesterfield
County Board of Supervisors supports the Regional Plan for
School Readiness 2017-2020, and recognizes the many
Chesterfield County agencies and partnerships that
contributed to the development of this new regional plan to
advance school readiness in Chesterfield County and
throughout the region.
Ayes: Jaeckle, Haley, Winslow, Holland and Elswick.
Nays: None.
16-797
04/26/17
12:D..1.f. GUARANTEEING.. COMPL,ETION.OF. WORK WITHIN VIRGINIA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION MOT) RIGHT=OF-WAY
On motion . of Mr . . Winslow, seconded by Mr:.. Holland, the Board
adopted the following resolution:
WHEREAS,it becomes. necessary from. time to time for
Chesterfield County to. obtain .land use._permits from the
Virginia. Department .of Transportation to .install, construct,
-maintain.. 'and operate certain public.. works and public
utilities projects.: along, across.;.. over and upon highway
systems. of the.Commonweaith of Virginia;. and,
WHEREAS,_. expense, damage, or. injury:may .be- sustained by
the:.Commonwealth.of: Virginia as a result of the. granting. to
Chesterfield County by the Virginia Department of
Transportation -of -said permits.for.the.work aforesaid;
NOW., THEREFORE, BE -IT RESOLVED by. the Chesterfield
County Board of Supervisors this 26th day of April, 2017:
Section -,:1: That in.accordan e:with:the provisions.o.f Section
24VAC30.-151-7.20.of the. Land. Use Permit. Regulations of the
Virginia Department: of Transportation, Chesterfield County
does. hereby .grant assurances to. the Virginia Department of..
Transportation.(VDOT.) that it shall in all respects comply
with all of the conditions of the permit or p:ermits:that have
been.. or. .will be, granted to Chesterfield County, and -
guarantees the successful completion of the work, or, if
appropriate, restoration. of the right of way to its original.
condition.
Section. _2: That the County Administrator; or his/her
designee, be., and .hereby is authorized to.execute .on behalf
of Chesterfield County, alllandusepermits and related
document.s.of..the Virginia Department of Transportation.
Section.: 3: That this resolution. shall be:. a continuing
resolution and shall, riot be revoked unless and until sixty
(6.0). days written .notice of any proposed revocation be:
submitted to.the Virginia Department of Transportation.
Section 4: That Chesterfield County shall, if requested by
the::Virginia:Department: of Transportation, provide a letter
that •. commits to using the surety .provided by its contractor
or to have the contractor execute a dual obligation rider
that. .adds the Virginia.: Department of Transportation .as. -an.
additional. obligee,.to the surety. bond provided, to the
locality,:`with.either of these.options guaranteeing the work:
performed within state maintained right -of. -way under the
terms of the -land use permit for that purpose.
BE IT STILL FURTHER RESOLVED that the County
Administrator, or his/her -designee, :be, and hereby is
authorized and directed to procure insurance required by
Section 1 herein..
Ayes.: Jaeckle,. Haley, Winslow, Holland. and Elswick.
Nays None.
16-798.
04/26/17.
12.D.1.g. RECOGNIZING MAY AS "INTERNAL AUDIT AWARENESS
MONTH"
On motion of Mr. Winslow, seconded by Mr. Holland, the Board
adopted the following resolution:
WHEREAS, internal -auditors serve an essential role as.
independent, objective professionals who help organizations
improve their operations and accomplish their objectives;
and
WHEREAS, internal auditors provide a. systematic
approach to evaluate and improve the effectiveness of
managing risks, controls, and processes; and
WHEREAS, internal auditors . raise awareness for
important issues, including reliability and integrity of
information, transparency and compliance with . policies
and regulations; and
WHEREAS, internal auditors analyze their findings and
offer recommendat ions for. management to improve their
operation and/or productivity.; and
WHEREAS, internal. auditors promote an ethical culture
and accountability, and provide methods to report suspected
fraud, waste and abuse; and
WHEREAS, Internal Audit . Awareness Month is an
opportunity to acknowledge the efforts and contributions of
internal auditors to residents and employees in
Chesterfield County.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chesterfield
County Board of Supervisors hereby recognizes the month of
May as "Internal Audit Awareness Month" in Chesterfield
County and .encourages all citizens to join .in commemorating
this observanc-e.
Ayes: Jaeckle, Haley, Winslow, Holland and Elswick.
Nays: None.
12.D.2. APPROVAL OF MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN THE
DEFENSE LOGISTICS AGENCY AVIATION AND THE.
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY .POLICE DEPARTMENT
On motion of Mr. Winslow, seconded by Mr. Holland, the Board
authorized the Chief of Policeto execute the Memorandum of
Understanding with the Defense Logistics Agency Aviation on
behalf of the. Chesterfield County Police Department. (It is
noted a copy of the MOU is filed with the papers of. this.
Board.)
Ayes: Jaeckle, Haley, Winslow, Holland and Elswick.
Nays: None.
16-799
04/26/17
12.D.3. SET DATES FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS
12.D.3.a. TO CONSIDER AN AMENDMENT TO SECTION 9-57 OF THE
COUNTY CODE TO PROVIDE FOR A SEPARATE TAX
CLASSIFICATION FOR MOTOR VEHICLES OWNED OR LEASED
BY AUXILIARY DEPUTY SHERIFFS
On motion of Mr. Winslow, seconded by Mr. Holland, the Board
set a public hearing for May 24, 2017, to consider an
amendment to Section 9-57 of the County Code to provide for a
separate tax classification for motor vehicles owned or,
leased by auxiliary deputy sheriffs.
Ayes: Jaeckle, Haley, Winslow, Holland and Elswick.
Nays: None.
12.D.3.b. TO CONSIDER AMENDMENTS TO SECTION 10-10 OF THE
COUNTY CODE RELATED TO SERVICE FEES FOR EMERGENCY
AMBULANCE TRANSPORT
On motion of Mr. Winslow, seconded by Mr. Holland, the Board
set a public hearing for May 24,,2017, to consider amendments
to the County Code related to service fees for emergency
ambulance transport.
Ayes: Jaeckle, Haley, Winslow, Holland and.Elswick.
Nays: None.
12.D.3.c. TO CONSIDER A PROPOSED CODE AMENDMENT RELATED TO
COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL USES
On motion of Mr. Winslow, seconded by Mr. Holland, the Board
set a public hearing for May 24, 2017, on a code amendment
relating to commercial and industrial uses.
Ayes: Jaeckle, Haley, Winslow, Holland and Elswick.
Nays: None.
12.D.4. AUTHORIZE APPLICATION FOR FEDERAL GRANT ASSISTANCE
FROM THE LAND AND WATER CONSERVATION FUND FOR
FACILITY DEVELOPMENT OF PARKING AREA AND TRAIL
SYSTEM AT BROWN AND WILLIAMSON CONSERVATION AREA ON
THE JAMES RIVER AND TRANSFER AND APPROPRIATION OF
MATCHING FUNDS UPON AWARD
On motion of Mr. Winslow, seconded by Mr. Holland, the Board
adopted and authorized the following resolution in support of
an application for grant funds from the Land and Water
Conservation Fund for development of a parking area and trail
system at Brown and Williamson Conservation Area on the James
River, and authorized the County Administrator to execute the
grant agreement and transfer and appropriate up to $255,000
in matching funds upon grant award:
WHEREAS, under the provision of LWCF, federal funding
assistance is requested to aid in financing the cost of land
acquisition and/or facility development; and
WHEREAS, County of Chesterfield, VA considers it in the
best public interest to complete the land acquisition and/or
development project described in the application;
16-800
04/26/17
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that:
1. The County Administrator, or his designee, be authorized
to make formal application to DCR for funding
assistance; and
2. Any fund assistance received be used for implementation
and completion of (land acquisition and facility
development) within the specified timeframe; and
3. County of Chesterfield, VA hereby certifies that project
funding is currently available and is committed for this
project from the Parks CIP; and
4. We are aware that the grant, if approved by the National
Park Service, will be paid on a reimbursement basis.
This means we may only request payment after eligible
and allowable costs have already been paid to our
vendors and evidence of such has been provided to DCR in
the format required; and
S. We acknowledge that any property acquired and/or
developed with financial aid from the Land & Water
Conservation Fund must be placed in use and be retained
in perpetuity as a public outdoor recreation area in
accordance with the provisions and requirements of the
Land and Water Conservation Fund Act of 1965, as
amended; and
6. We acknowledge that any non -recreational uses may,not be
made of the property without undergoing a conversion of
use process and obtaining approval from the Department
of Conservation and Recreation and the U.S. Department
of Interior/National Park Service; and
7. We acknowledge that we are responsible for compliance
with the National Environmental Policy Act, Endangered
Species Act, Historic Preservation Act, Executive Orders
11988 and 11990 (Floodplain Management .and Wetlands
Protection) and all other applicable state and federal
laws; and
8. We acknowledge that appropriate opportunity for public
comment will be provided on this application and
evidence of such is a required component for approval.
9. This resolution becomes part of a formal application to
the Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation.
Ayes: Jaeckle, Haley, Winslow, Holland and Elswick.
Nays: None.
12.D.5. AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD A CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT AND
CHANGE ORDERS FOR THE ARCH ROAD (ROUTE 60 TO
ARBORETUM PARKWAY) WIDENING AND ROUNDABOUT PROJECT
On motion of Mr. Winslow, seconded by Mr. Holland, the Board
authorized the Director of Purchasing to award a construction
contract, up to $2,700,000, to the lowest responsive and
responsible bidder, and to execute all necessary changes
orders, up to the full amount budgeted, for. the Arch Road
(Route 60 to Arboretum Parkway) Widening and Roundabout
Project.
Ayes: Jaeckle, Haley, Winslow, Holland and Elswick.
Nays: None.
16-801
04/26/17
12.D.6. ACCEPTANCE OF STATE ROADS
On motion of Mr. Winslow, seconded by Mr. Holland, the Board
adopted the following resolution:
WHEREAS, the streets described below are shown on a plat
recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of
Chesterfield County; and
WHEREAS, the Resident Engineer for the Virginia
Department of Transportation has advised this Board the
streets meet the requirements established by the Subdivision
Street Requirements of the Virginia Department of
Transportation.,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that this Board requests
the Virginia Department of Transportation to add the streets
described below to the secondary system of state highways,
pursuant to Section 33.2-705, Code of Virginia, and the
Department's Subdivision Street Requirements.
AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that this Board guarantees
a'clear and unrestricted right-of-way, as described, and any
necessary easements for cuts, fills and drainage.
AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that a certified copy of
this resolution be forwarded to the Resident,Engineer for the
Virginia Department of Transportation.
Project/Subdivision: Rountrey Section 2
Type Change to the Secondary System miles.%of State Highways:
AAAI 1-i nn
Reason for Change: New subdivision street
Pursuant to Code of Virginia Statute: §33.2-705
Street Name and/or Route Number
• Endstone Trail, State Route Number 7930
From: Port Savage Drive, (Route.7352)
To: The cul-de-sac, a distance of: 0.08 miles.
Recordation Reference: Plat Book 231, Page 30
Right of Way width (feet) = 44
• Endstone,Trail, State Route Number 7930
From: Port Savage Drive, (Route 7352)
To: The end of maintenance, a distance of: 0.21 miles.
Recordation Reference: Plat Book 231, Page 30
Right of Way width (feet) = 46
• Rankin Drive, State Route Number 7931
From: Port Savage Drive, (Route 7352)
To: The cul-de-sac, a distance of: 0.06 miles.
Recordation Reference: Plat Book 231, Page 30
Right of Way width (feet) = 40
• Port Savage Drive, State Route Number 7352
From: Rankin Drive, (Route 7931)
To: Distaff Road, (Route 7932), a distance of: 0.06 miles.
Recordation Reference: Plat Book 231,, Page 30
Right of Way width (feet) = 40
16-802
04/26/17
• Graythorne Drive, State Route Number 7934
From: Rankin Drive, (Route 7931)
To: Norland Road (Route 7935), a distance of: 0.03 miles.
Recordation Reference: Plat Book 231, Page 30
Right of Way width (feet) = 50
• Graythorne Drive, State Route Number 7934
From: Rankin Drive, (Route 79 31)
To: The cul-de-sac, a distance of: 0.05 miles.
Recordation Reference: Plat Book 231, Page 30
Right of Way width (feet) = 44
• Graythorne Drive, State Route Number 7934
From: Norland Road (Route 7935)
To: The end of maintenance, a distance of: 0.01 miles.
Recordation Reference: Plat Book 231, Page 30_
Right of Way width (feet) = 50
• Norland Road, State Route Number 7935
From: Graythorne Drive, (Route 7934)
To: Woolridge Road, (Route 668), a distance of: 0.05.miles.
Recordation Reference: Plat Book 231, Page 30
Right of Way width . (feet) = 55
• Rankin Drive, State Route Number 7931
From: Rankin Court, (Route 7933)
To: Graythorne Drive, (Route 7934), a distance of: 0.11
miles.
Recordation Reference: Plat Book 231, Page 30
Right of Way width (feet) = 50
• Rankin Drive, State Route Number 7931
From: Port Savage Drive; (Route 7352)
To: Rankin Court, (Route 7933), a distance of: 0.04 miles.
Recordation Reference: Plat Book 231, Page 30
Right of Way width (feet) = 40
• Distaff Road, State Route Number -7932
From: Port Savage Drive, (Route 7352)
To: The cul-de-sac, a distance of: 0.06 miles..
Recordation Reference: Plat Book 231, Page 30
Right of Way width (feet) = 40
• Port Savage -Drive, State Route Number 7352
From: Endstone Trail, (Route 7930)
To: Rankin Drive, (Route 7931'), a distance of: 0.07 miles.
Recordation Reference: Plat Book 231, Page 30
Right of Way width (feet) = 40,
• Port Savage Drive, State Route Number 7352
From: 0.02 miles north of Bayfront Way, (Route 7351)
To: Endstone Trail, (Route 7930)., a distance of: 0.04
miles.
Recordation Reference: Plat Book 231, Page 30
Right of Way width (feet) = 44
• Distaff Road, State Route Number 7932
From: Port Savage Drive, (Route 7352)
To: The cul-de-sac, a distance of: 0.06 miles.
Recordation Reference: Plat Book 231, Page 30
Right of Way width (feet) = 40
16-803
04/26/17
• Rankin Court, State Route Number 7933
From: Rankin Drive, (Route 7931)
To: The cul-de-sac, a distance of: 0.05 miles.
Recordation Reference: Plat Book 231, Page 30
Right bf Way width (feet) = 40
And, further, the Board adopted the following resolution:
WHEREAS, the street described below is shown on a plat
recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of
Chesterfield County; and
WHEREAS, the Resident Engineer for the Virginia
Department of Transportation has advised this Board the
street meets the requirements established by the Subdivision
Street Requirements of the Virginia Department of
Transportation.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that this Board requests
the Virginia Department of Transportation to add the street
described below to the secondary system of state highways,
pursuant to Section 33.2-705, Code of Virginia, and the
Department's Subdivision Street Requirements.
AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that this Board guarantees
a clear and unrestricted right-of-way, as described, and any
necessary easements for cuts, fills and drainage.
AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that a certified copy of
this resolution be forwarded to the Resident Engineer -for the
Virginia Department of Transportation.
Project/Subdivision: North Otterdale Road Connection
Type Change to the Secondary System miles of State Highways:
Arm; i -i nn
Reason for Change: New subdivision street
Pursuant to Code of Virginia Statute: §33.2-705
Street Name and/or Route Number
• North Otterdale Road, State Route Number 970
From: 0.08 miles north of Creekbrook Drive, (Route 7778)
To: 0.01 miles south of Latham Boulevard, (Route 5094), a
distance of: 0.15 miles.
Recordation Reference: Deed Book 11444, page 709
Right of Way width ,(feet) = 80
Ayes: Jaeckle, Haley, Winslow, Holland and Elswick.
Nays: None.
12.D.7. STREETLIGHT COST APPROVALS IN THE FIVE FORKS VILLAGE
SUBDIVISION AND TRANSFER OF DALE DISTRICT
IMPROVEMENT FUNDS TO STREETLIGHTS TO FUND THE
vRn.-rFrm�
On motion of Mr. Winslow, seconded by Mr. Holland, the Board
approved the following streetlight installation in the Five
Forks Village Subdivision and authorized the transfer of Dale
District Improvement Funds to streetlights to fund the
project:
• In the Five Forks Village subdivision
At the intersection of Five Forks Lane and Mill
River Lane
Cost to install streetlight: $2,500.00
16-804
04/26/17
• In the Five Forks Village subdivision
At the intersection of Five Forks Lane and Waterman
Lane
Cost to install streetlight: $2,500.00
• In the Five Forks Village subdivision
At the Five Forks Lane entrance to the Five Forks
Village
community clubhouse area
Cost to install streetlight: $2,500.00
Ayes: Jaeckle, Haley, Winslow, Holland and Elswick.
Nays: None.
12.D.8. APPROVAL OF DOCUMENTS RELATED TO THE REFINANCING OF
THE CHIPPENHAM PLACE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
On motion of Mr. Winslow, seconded by Mr. Holland, the Board
adopted the following resolution:
RESOLUTION APPROVING A PLAN OF
REFINANCING OF PRIOR OBLIGATIONS ISSUED
BY THE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF
THE COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD AND THE
CHIPPENHAM PLACE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
AUTHORITY, AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF
CERTAIN DOCUMENTS IN CONNECTION THEREWITH
AND APPROVING THE FORMS OF SUCH DOCUMENTS
WHEREAS, the Economic Development Authority of the
County of -Chesterfield (the "EDA") purchased certain property
comprising approximately 83 acres located in the County of
Chesterfield, Virginia (the "County"), formerly known as
Cloverleaf Mall, to be sold and redeveloped into a mixed-use
facility including residential, office, retail and other
commercial space (the "Project") for the public purpose of
facilitating economic development in the County;
WHEREAS, on June 25, 2008, the Board of Supervisors of
the County (the "Board of Supervisors") adopted an ordinance,,
which, among other things, (a) created the Chippenham Place
Community Development Authority (the "CDA") to finance
certain infrastructure improvements related to the Project
(the "Improvements") for the peculiar benefit of the property
owners within and abutting the geographic boundaries of the
CDA's district (the "CDA District") and (b) approved a plan
of financing for the Improvements pursuant to which the CDA
was authorized to issue bonds secured in part by the
collection of special assessments on and tax increment
revenues from the real property comprising the CDA District;
WHEREAS, on June 15, 2011, at the request of the CDA,
the Board of Supervisors adopted an ordinance, which, among
other things, (a) approved the execution of a Memorandum of
Understanding dated as of October 1, 2011 (the "Original
MOU"), between the County, the CDA and Stonebridge Realty
Holdings LLC, providing for the financing of the Improvements
through the payment of special assessments and tax increment
revenues and (b) established and apportioned a special
assessment on the real property comprising the CDA District
in accordance with the Rate and Method of Apportionment of
Special Assessments attached to the Original MOU;
16-805
.04/26/17
WHEREAS, in October 2011, the- EDA issued and sold its
Tax -Exempt Revenue Note (Stonebridge Project), Series 2011
(the "2011 EDA Note"), to Wells Fargo Bank, National
Association ("Wells Fargo"), in accordance with the terms of
a Note Purchase Agreement dated as of October 1, 2011 (the
112011 Purchase Agreement"), and loaned the proceeds of the
2011 EDA Note to the CDA to finance the Improvements, with
the loan to be paid from and secured by payments representing
the collection of special assessments on and tax increment
revenues from certain parcels located in the CDA District
described in the Original MOU and pledged in accordance with
the terms of a Financing Agreement dated as of October 1,
2011, between the EDA and the CDA, and the CDA's Special
Assessment Revenue Note, Series 2011 (the 112011 CDA Note"),
issued pursuant thereto;
WHEREAS, in December 2014, the EDA and Wells Fargo
amended and restated the terms of the 2011 Purchase Agreement
(as amended and restated, the "2014 Purchase Agreement") and
substituted the EDA's Tax -Exempt Revenue Note (Chesterfield
Mall Redevelopment - Stonebridge Project Restatement), Series
2014B (the "2014 EDA Note"), issued pursuant to the 2014
Purchase Agreement, for the 2011 EDA Note;
WHEREAS, pursuant to the terms of a Financing Agreement
dated as of December 1, 2014, the CDA issued its Special
Assessment Revenue Note, Series 2014 (the 112014 CDA -Note"),
in exchange for the 2011 CDA Note to facilitate the amendment
and restatement of the 2011 Purchase Agreement;
WHEREAS, the .CDA and the EDA have adopted resolutions on
April 7, 2017, and April 20, 2017, respectively, approving a
plan of refinancing the Improvements, pursuant to which (a)
the EDA will issue and sell its Tax -Exempt Revenue Refunding
Bond, Series 2017 (the 112017 EDA Bond"), to Pinnacle Public
Finance, Inc. (the "Bank"), and use the proceeds thereof to
refund the 2014 EDA Note, and (b) simultaneously, the EDA
will restructure the obligation of the CDA -represented by the
2014 CDA Note by extinguishing the 2014 CDA Note and
acquiring the CDA's Special Assessment Revenue Note, Series
2017 (the -"2017 CDA Note");
WHEREAS, the EDA and the County administration have
determined that the 2017 EDA Bond shall ,be secured by and
payable from appropriations made by the County (the "Support
Agreement Revenues") pursuant to a Support Agreement (the
"Support Agreement") between the County and the EDA and shall
be further secured by .an assignment of the EDA's rights,
title and interests in the Support Agreement;
WHEREAS, the County desires to amend the Original MOU
to, among other things, provide for the issuance of the 2017
CDA Note and revise the provisions governing the funding
requirements for the Surplus Fund established thereunder; and
WHEREAS, there- have been submitted to this meeting
drafts of the following:
(a) a First Amendment to Memorandum of Understanding
(the "First Amendment") between the County, the
CDA, the EDA and the other owners of -the land
comprising the CDA District; and
(b) the Support Agreement;
16-806
04/26/17
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
OF THE COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD, VIRGINIA:
The following. plan of refinancing the Improvements is
hereby approved. The EDA shall issue the 2017 EDA Bond to
refund the 2014 EDA Note. The EDA shall issue and deliver
the 2017 EDA Bond to the Bank and agree to repay the loan
evidenced thereby pursuant to the terms of a loan agreement
(the "Loan Agreement"). The County shall undertake, subject
to appropriation by the Board of Supervisors, to provide for
the payment of any amounts due under the 2017 EDA Bond,
pursuant to the terms of the Support Agreement. The
obligation of the EDA to make payments under the 2017 EDA
Bond and the Loan Agreement shall be limited to the Support
Agreement Revenues, which shall be assigned to the Bank
pursuant to the Loan Agreement and the Support Agreement.
The 2017 EDA Bond shall be further secured by an assignment
to the Bank of the EDA's rights, title and interests in the
Support Agreement pursuant to the Loan Agreement and the
Support Agreement. In connection with the refunding of the
2014 EDA Note, the EDA shall acquire the 2017 CDA. Note and
extinguish the 2014 CDA Note pursuant to terms -of a financing
agreement. This plan of refinancing shall contain such
additional requirements and provisions as the County
Administrator may approve and determine, in collaboration
with the Chairman or Vice -Chairman of the EDA, to be in the
best interests of the County and the EDA.
As required by Section 1 of the Original MOU, the Board
of Supervisors hereby approves of the issuance of the 2017
CDA Note.
The form of the First Amendment submitted to this
meeting is hereby approved. The County Administrator is
hereby authorized to execute and deliver the First Amendment
in substantially such form, with such completions, omissions,
insertions and changes not inconsistent with this Resolution
as may be approved by the County Administrator, whose
approval shall be evidenced conclusively by the execution and
delivery thereof.
In consideration of the EDA's undertakings with respect
to the 2017 EDA Bond, the County Administrator is hereby
authorized and directed to execute and deliver the Support
Agreement. The Support Agreement shall be in substantially
the form presented to this meeting, which is hereby approved,
with such completions, omissions, insertions or changes not
inconsistent with this Resolution as may be approved by the
County Administrator, whose approval shall be evidenced
conclusively by the execution and delivery thereof.
As provided by the ,Support. Agreement, the Board of
Supervisors hereby undertakes a non-binding commitment to
appropriate to the EDA such amounts as are necessary to pay
the debt service due on the 2017 EDA Bond as well as other
payments due under the Loan Agreement, to the fullest degree
and in such manner as is consistent with the Constitution and
laws of the Commonwealth of Virginia. The Board of
Supervisors, while recognizing that it is not empowered to
make any binding commitment to make such appropriations in
future fiscal years, hereby states its intent to make such
appropriations in future fiscal years, and hereby recommends
that future Boards of Supervisors do likewise during the term
of the Support Agreement -
All other actions of officers of the County in
conformity with the purposes and intent of this Resolution
and in furtherance of the plan of refinancing are hereby
ratified, approved and confirmed. The officers of the County
are hereby authorized and directed to execute and deliver all
16-807
04/26/17
certificates and instruments and to take all such further
action' as may be considered necessary or desirable in
connection with the completion of the plan of refinancing.
All resolutions or, parts of resolutions in conflict
herewith are repealed.
This Resolution shall take effect immediately.
Ayes: Jaeckle, Haley, Winslow, Holland and Elswick.
Nays:, None.
12.D.9. ACCEPTANCE OF PARCELS OF LAND
12.D.9.a. ALONG IRON BRIDGE ROAD AND COGBILL ROAD FROM
GEORGE T. ANDREADIS AND LUANN W. ANDREADIS
On motion of Mr. Winslow, seconded by Mr. Holland, the Board
accepted the conveyance of parcels of land containing a total
of 0.575 acres along Iron Bridge Road and Cogbill Road from
George T. Andreadis and Luann W. Andreadis and authorized the
County Administrator to execute the deed-. (It is noted a copy
of the plat is filed with the papers of this Board.)
Ayes: Jaeckle, Haley, Winslow, Holland and Elswick.
Nays: None.
12.D.9.b. ALONG RUFFIN MILL ROAD FROM CMA PROPERTIES,
INCORPORATED
On motion of Mr. Winslow, seconded by Mr. Holland, the Board
accepted the conveyance of a parcel of land containing 0.11
acres along Ruffin Mill Road from CMA, Properties, Inc. and
authorized the County Administrator to execute the deed. (It
is noted a copy of the plat is'filed with the -papers of this
Board.)
Ayes: Jaeckle, Haley, Winslow, Holland and Elswick.
Nays: None.
12.D.9.c. ALONG IRON BRIDGE ROAD FROM GTALAA, LLC
On motion of Mr. Winslow, seconded by Mr. Holland, the Board
accepted the conveyance of a parcel of land containing 0.095
acres along Iron Bridge Road from GTALAA, LLC, and authorized
the County Administrator to execute the deed. (It is noted -a
copy of the plat is filed with the papers of this Board.)
Ayes: Jaeckle, Haley, Winslow, Holland and,Elswick.
Nays: None.
12.D.9.d. ALONG JEFFERSON DAVIS HIGHWAY FROM H. E. WAMSLEY
TRUCKING, INCORPORATED
On.motion of Mr. Winslow, seconded by Mr. Holland, the Board
accepted the conveyance of a parcel of land containing 0.709
acres along Jefferson 'Davis Highway from H. E. Wamsley
Trucking, Inc. and authorized the County Administrator to
execute the deed. (It is noted a copy of the plat is filed
with the papers of.this Board.) -
Ayes: Jaeckle, Haley, Winslow, Holland and Elswick.
Nays: None.
16-808
04/26/17
12.D.9.e. ALONG OLD OTTERDALE ROAD FROM POWHATAN COMMUNITY
CHURCH, INCORPORATED
On motion of Mr. Winslow, seconded by Mr. Holland, the Board
accepted the conveyance of land of two parcels of land
containing 0.288 acres along Old Otterdale Road from -Powhatan
Community Church, Inc. and authorized the County
Administrator to execute the deed. (It is noted a copy of the
plat is filed with the papers of this Board.)
Ayes: Jaeckle, Haley, Winslow, Holland and Elswick.
Nays: None.
12.D.9.f. ALONG IRON BRIDGE ROAD FROM SOUTHSIDE BAPTIST
CHURCH
On motion of Mr. Winslow, seconded by Mr. Holland, the Board
accepted the conveyance of a parcel of land containing 0.055
acres along Iron Bridge Road from Southside Baptist Church
and authorized the County Administrator to execute the deed.
(It is noted a copy of the plat is filed with the papers of
this Board.)
Ayes: Jaeckle, Haley, Winslow, Holland and Elswick.
Nays: None.
12.D.10. APPROVAL OF THE PURCHASE OF OFF-SITE RIGHT OF WAY
FOR THE BEULAH ELEMENTARY SCHOOL REPLACEMENT
PROJECT
12.D.10.a. FROM BERNARD HUFF, INCORPORATED
On motion of Mr. Winslow, seconded by Mr. Holland, the Board
approved the purchase of two parcels of land containing 0.269
acres, for $8,445 from Bernard Huff, Inc., for road
improvements for the off-site right of way for the Beulah
Elementary School Replacement Project, and authorized the
County Administrator to execute the deed. (It is noted a copy
of the plat is filed with the papers of this Board.)
Ayes: Jaeckle, Haley, Winslow, Holland and Elswick.
Nays: None.
12.D.10.b. FROM KIMBERLY GRAMMER
On motion of Mr. Winslow, seconded by Mr. Holland, the Board
approved the purchase of a parcel of land containing .013
acres for $600 from Kimberly Grammer for road improvements
for the Beulah Elementary School- Replacement Project, and
authorized the -County Administrator to execute the deed. (It
is noted a copy of the plat is filed with the papers of this
Board.)
Ayes: Jaeckle, Haley, Winslow, Holland and Elswick.
Nays: None.
16-809
04/26/17-
12.D.11. DESIGNATION OF RIGHT OF WAY FOR THE NEW BEULAH
ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
On motion of Mr. Winslow, seconded by Mr. Holland, the Board
designated right of way along Beulah Road for the New Beulah
Elementary School and authorized the County Administrator to
execute the designation. (It is noted a -copy of the plat is
filed with the papers of this Board.)
Ayes: Jaeckle, Haley, Winslow, Holland and Elswick.
Nays: None.
12.D.12. REQUESTS TO QUITCLAIM
12.D.12.a. PORTIONS OF A SIXTEEN -,FOOT SEWER EASEMENT ACROSS
PROPERTIES OF EMERSON -ROPER COMPANIES, LLC AND
EVB, INCORPORATED
On motion of Mr. Winslow; seconded by Mr. Holland, the Board
authorized the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors and the
County Administrator to execute a quitclaim deed to vacate
portions of a 16 -foot sewer easement across properties of
Emerson -Roper Companies, LLC and EVB, Inc. (It is noted a
copy of the plat is filed with the papers of this Board.)
Ayes: Jaeckle, Haley, Winslow, Holland and Elswick.
Nays: None.`
12.D.12.b. SIXTEEN -FOOT DRAINAGE EASEMENTS ACROSS THE
PROPERTY OF MACH 39, LLC
On motion of.Mr. Winslow, -seconded by Mr.' Holland, the Board
authorized the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors and the
County Administrator to execute a quitclaim deed to vacate
16 -foot drainage easements across the property of Mach 39,
LLC. (It is noted a copy of the plat is filed with the papers
of this Board.)
Ayes: Jaeckle, Haley, Winslow, Holland and Elswick.
Nays: None.
12.D.13. DESIGNATION OF EASEMENTS FOR THE LEGORDON DRIVE
SIDEWALK PROJECT
On motion of Mr. Winslow, seconded by Mr. ,Holland, the Board
designated a Virginia Department of Transportation sidewalk
easement and a VDOT sight distance easement for the LeGordon
Drive Sidewalk Improvement Project and authorized the County
Administrator to execute the designation. (It is noted a copy
of the plat,is filed with the papers of this Board.)
Ayes: Jaeckle, Haley, Winslow, Holland and Elswick.
Nays: None.
16-810
04/26/17
12.D.14. REQUEST FOR PERMISSION FROM LIM FAMILY PARTNERSHIP
TO INSTALL A PRIVATE WATER SERVICE WITHIN A
PRIVATE EASEMENT TO SERVE PROPERTY ON HULL STREET
ROAD
On motion of Mr. Winslow, seconded by, Mr. Holland, the Board
granted the Lim Family Partnership permission to install a
private water service within a private easement to serve
property at 10800 Hull Street Road, and authorized the County
.Administrator to execute the water connection agreement. (It
is noted a copy of the plat is filed with the papers of this
Board.)
Ayes: Jaeckle, Haley, Winslow, Holland and Elswick.
Nays: None.
12.D.15. DESIGNATION OF A DRAINAGE EASEMENT FOR VIRGINIA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION MAINTENANCE AND A
TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT FOR THE ROUTE 10
AT BRANDERS BRIDGE RIGHT TURN LANE PROJECT
On motion of Mr. Winslow, seconded by Mr. Holland, the Board
designated a drainage easement for VDOT maintenance and a
temporary construction easement for the Route 10 at Branders
Bridge Right Turn Lane Project and authorized the County
Administrator to execute the designation. (It is noted a copy
of the plat is filed with the papers of this Board.)
Ayes: Jaeckle, Haley, Winslow, Holland and Elswick.
Nays: None.
12.D.16. APPROVAL OF A "FIRST AMENDMENT TO AMENDED WATER
CONTRACT" WITH THE CITY OF RICHMOND FOR AN
ADDITIONAL FIVE MILLION GALLONS PER DAY OF WATER
rAPArTTV
On motion of Mr. Winslow, seconded by Mr. Holland, the Board
approved the "First Amendment to Amended Water Contract" with
the City of Richmond in a form acceptable to the County
Attorney and authorized the County Administrator to execute
the necessary documents. (It is noted a copy of the document
is filed with the papers of this Board.)
Ayes: Jaeckle, Haley, Winslow, Holland and Elswick.
Nays: None.
12.D.17. APPROVAL OF LIMITING PARTICIPATION IN THE URBAN
ARCHERY DEER HUNTING SEASON TO THE MIDLOTHIAN
MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
On motion of Mr. Winslow, seconded by Mr. Holland, the Board
authorized the County Administrator to notify the Virginia
Department of Game and Inland Fisheries that Chesterfield
County is limiting participation in the urban archery deer
hunting season to the boundaries of the Midlothian
Magisterial District for the upcoming season.
Ayes: Jaeckle, Haley, Winslow, Holland and Elswick.
Nays: None.
16-811
04/26/17
12.D.18. TRANSFER OF BERMUDA DISTRICT IMPROVEMENT FUNDS TO
THE DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION TO IMPROVE
THE LAWN/SPECIAL EVENTS AREA AND INSTALL BENCHES AT
FALLING CREEK IRONWORKS PARK
On motion of Mr. Winslow, seconded -by Mr. Holland, the Board
transferred $4,200 from the Bermuda District Improvement Fund
to.the Department of Parks and Recreation to improve the
lawn/special events area and install benches at Falling Creek
Ironworks Park.
Ayes: Jaeckle, Haley, Winslow, Holland and Elswick.
Nays: None.
13. FIFTEEN -MINUTE CITIZEN COMMENT PERIOD ON UNSCHEDULED
MATTERS
Mr. David Paxton, representing the_ United States Guard
Auxiliary, Flotilla 31, addressed the Board regarding the
importance of "Safe Boating Week."
Ms. Judy Stoneman expressed concerns relative to increased
traffic associated with development in the Chester area.
Mr. Don Wilms stated the majority of those in attendance
wearing red were mostly the community in support of schools.
Mr. Ben Pearson -Nelson presented the Board with hundreds of
written requests for county citizens urging the Board to
support the teachers' Supplemental Retirement Program and not
to reduce the real estate tax rate.
14. DEFERRED ITEMS
14.A. ROAD CASH PROFFER POLICY UPDATE
Mr. Dupler stated on January 25, 2017 the Board deferred
further consideration of a road cash proffer policy until its
April meeting. He further stated since that time county staff
has been focusing on implementation of the newly adopted cash
proffer policy the Board approved on September 28, 2016. He
stated the adoption did not define what was originally called
"Revitalization and Preservation Areas." In addition, he
stated certain aspects of the road cash proffer policy need
to be further clarified in -order to provide a more consistent
and goal -oriented process. He further stated over ,the course
of the last several months staff has been engaged in a number
of follow-up conversations with the Board as well as members
of the Planning Commission. Subsequently, he stated the Board
and Planning Commission have approved 35 cases since January
resulting in an increased practical understanding of how the
new law and policy come together. In addition, on April 18,
2017, he stated the -Planning Commission approved 18 more
cases, and there are another 14 cases on the board agenda for
this meeting. He further stated because of this experience
and these conversations, staff proposes further
clarifications to the road cash proffer policy. He noted the
proposed changes are highlighted in the draft policy.
16-812
04/26/17
Mr. Winslow stated the stricken language in Section A,
paragraph 4 should be unstricken due to the confusion caused.
He further stated the implementation of the criteria is a
much better approach to doing revitalization analysis because
it is more focused and individualized. He stated there is
certainly more staff time that is going to be required going
forward with the process.
Mr. Winslow then made a motion to adopt the policy and retain
the stricken language, in Section A, paragraph 4, of the Road
Cash Proffer Policy.
Mr. Elswick seconded the motion.
Ms. Haley voiced her support of the motion and concurred with
Mr. Winslow's remarks relative to the implementation of a
criteria -based policy.
In response to Mr. Holland's inquiry, Dr. Casey stated the
goal of the policy is to serve applicants and present staff
reports to the Planning Commission as well as continue to
work with developers to best present zoning cases to the
people. He further stated there may be certain cases where a
developer proposes a project for which it may benefit his/her
project to collaborate with the county to acquire land which
they may not own and would need to fund land acquisition.
Mr. Elswick voiced his support of the motion.
Ms. Jaeckle called for a vote on Mr. Winslow's motion,
seconded by Ms. Haley, for the Board to adopt the Road Cash
Proffer Policy and retain the stricken language in Section A,
paragraph 4.
Ayes: Jaeckle, Haley, Winslow, Holland and Elswick.
Nays: None.
14.B. CONSIDERATION OF AN AMENDMENT TO SECTION 19.1-42 OF
THE COUNTY CODE RELATIVE TO MAILED WRITTEN NOTICE
Mr. Cash stated on March 15, 2017, the Board conducted a
public hearing and deferred action until April 26, 2017. He
further stated the Board requested additional information
regarding the ordinance and practices used to notify
citizens of pending zoning actions. In addition, he stated
the Board requested that staff explore additional
notification avenues. He further stated Mr. Winslow
requested that staff provide a cost estimate of written
notifications based upon the existing ordinance versus the
ordinance outlined in Attachment A. He stated that
comparison includes not only the estimated county cost, but
also the, development community _cost (Attachment D). He
further stated the comparison is based upon a representative
hypothetical case. He stated costs per request can vary
depending upon the size of the property subject to the
zoning proposal. He further stated the second part of the
proposed amendment eliminates a duplication in two sections
of the ordinance related- to notification deadline to
adjacent localities and adds a requirement to notify any
property owner's associations within the development of the
property subject to a zoning proposal.
16-813
04/26/17
if the subject property: is located within 3,000
feet of the boundary of a military base,
installation,. airport, excluding armories
operated by the Virginia National Guard,, the_
commander, of the applicable military operation;'
and
• if the, sub' ect., property., i's located within 3, 0 0 0.
feet. of the boundary of a public use airport,.
the owner of the airport.
b. Amendment to Condition of Zoning,. Conditional Use,
or Conditional Use Planned Development. In addition.,
to those persons outlined in i.a., the planning
department shall notify it writing All owners whose
property was subject to the original zoning or
condition..provided.'such property is located within
1,500 feet of the subject property.
c. Zoning Approval. In.. addition to those persons
outlined in i.a. and 1'b., -if the subject property
is locatedwithin a development containing' open
.Space, the planning department shall notify- in
-writing any incorporated property owner's
association withih.the development.
d. Zoning Ordinance.. Text Amendments *.Decreasing
Allowable Density. Except for the owners of
subdivision lots having less than 11,500 square
feet, th e planning department shall. notify, in
writing, the owners of property which may be
impacted by a. zoning ordinance text amendment that
would decrease the allowable dwelling.unit density
of their lot.
e Zoning Approval for a Communications Tower. In
addition to those persons outlined, in l.a,., 1.b..
and i.c., thepldnningdepartment. shall notify -in
writing all owners of property within 1,500.feet.of.
the subject property.
f. Comprehensive Plan Amendments. The . planning
department. shall provide written notice. of a
proposed - comprehensive plan amendment to the,
following:.
if the proposed: amendment impacts property
within 0.5 miles of the boundary of an adjacent
locality, thatlocality's. chief administrative
officer or designee;
if the subject property is.within 3., 000 feet of. -
the boundary of a military base, installation,
airport, excluding armories. operated by. the
Virginia National Guard, the commander of. the
applicable military operation; and
• if the subject property is. within 3,000 feet of
the boundary of a public use airport, the.owner
of the airport;
if the proposed amendment designates or alters.
previously designated. corridors.. or routes for
16-815
04/26/17
LT/9Z/:�0
9T8 -9T
'auoN :sAPN
•l[0TMsT9 PUP PUPT-[0H 'mOlsu'rM 'AaTPH 'aTN0aer :saAW
'LTOZ
18Z aunr T?qun 9S90NSST as -e0 paaa999P
PaPog auq 'mOTSUTM --iw Ag papuooas 'AaTPH -SW_ _70 UOT-40W u0
'pasoTa SPM buTaPGq
azTgnd auq 'TPaaa.;ap 914-4 o-4 (Pads o-4 auo ou buzaq aaauy
- quawwo0 OzTgnd ao_; PaTT-ea aT-110a-er --syr
•T�aaa�ap
aup pagd000-2 '-qu-eozTdd-e aup buzquasaadaa 'uzTpuoO Apuv -aw
'buzgaaw PaTnpauOS ATaPTnSaa LTOZ '8Z aunr
aqq oq T-eaaajap P BUTgSGnbaa ST AaTPH 'sDq Pa-4-e-qs aauany .-TH
'SE9L PUP :i90Z 'SZTT-60L-SZL !TZT6
'TT69 'THS 'OTZb '8ZSZ 'TT£Z '£T£T-60L-:�ZL sQI xey 'sash
Paas* uOz:�zsu2a1 Pauu-eTd PUP g0zags-rQ TPz3aauiui00 u-eqangns
aoj aq-ezadoadd-e s -r Agaadoad auq sgsaSEns uPTd anzsuagaadwo0
auy -Spappupgs GOUPuzpa0 ao su0TgTPu03 buzuoz Ag
PaTToaquo0 aq TTTM AgTsuGC '9NTduany uPT-ggOTpzyq ;0 ugaou gaaJ
ST8 'PPoH pTazJaaquzM Jo auzT gSaM auq UO -4aa.; 08Z 5uz-4uoa.;
osTP :PPOH pTazgaaquzM JO gsam gaaj 088 'GIlTduany uPTLIgOTPTH
go auzT ggaou auk uo gaaj OS T buzquoaj saa0P L -SZ -uo
d-ew gaza�s-rp butuoz .jo quauipuaw-e PUP squawaaznbaa aouPuzpao
oq suozgdaoxa-4Tuzaad oq quaiudOTaAGP pauuPTd asn TPuozgzpuo0
TMm (8-0) ssauzsng AgzunwmOD oq (8-0) ssauzsng A-4zunwwo0
woag 5uzuozaa gsanbaa OZZ 'dzusaaugapd PuPq uP"ggOTPTW
PUP baaquaaa0 0aP14 'gazagsTC TPzaagSTBPH uPzugoTPTH uI
999ONSST
LT NOISOHS IV CrdVHH HS 'I'IIM
NOIZISOddO 0I'ISfld SI HHHHs-dO/aMV NOIIVCINHNKODH-d HHI
ldH00y YoN SHOa SNvoigddv alli ausHM sasyo - NoilISOddO
ON sI HHHHs a" NollKaldHNNODau HHZ SZdHOOrd INVDIgddy HHS
HHHHM sasyo - sqy-ausaaa7suymyuaHSIM - :uzcri0 oNim ' ma
HH1 NI CrdVHH HS OS VaMHOV INESNOO HHS No aaoygd
mIkozau a" slimad zRoH aauAmovanNvN uoa SSSHnoau *ST
'auoN :SAPN
'}[aTMSTS PUL PUPTTOH 'MOTSUTM 'AaTPH 'aTNDGPf :saAV
' UOTgdops uodn
ZT@4PTpaUWT anrgaagga awooaq TTPgS aDUPUTP.zo STq opus (Z)
Hes,
'buTapaq Aup aao_;aq sAPp .08 go wnwzuzw -e
pa:o{apwgsod aq TTPus a0zgou auq 'sqaodaTP asnazTgnd,
go saaumo ao suozgpaado AaugTTzw -o sa9puPwwo0
0-4 aotgou buzaznbaa SUOTgPDTTddp asOuq aoq •P
'auzTP-2aQ aaz-40N--Z
000
-sagnoa ao sa0Pzaa00
uozSSTwsupaq azag3GT9 pagPubtsap eons JO,
qa-ed AuP'a0 TTP sapnTou-r -4-eu-_ Aaogzaaaq aaznaas
pa-4-eDTJT-4aa0 P LDTM A'4tTTgn 0-rag3aTa 110Pa 'aaow
ao s4TOAOTTX OST ;o SauzT uozsszwsuPa-4 azaqOaTa
17SN0515
In Matoaca Magisterial District, Douglas and Susan Sowers
request amendment of conditional use planned development
(Case 03SN0307) relative to setbacks and to amend, cash
proffers and amendment of zoning district map in a
Residential (R-12) District on 98.7 acres located at the
southeast corner of Spring Run Road and Springford Parkway.
Density will be controlled by zoning conditions or Ordinance
standards. The .Comprehensive .Plan suggests the property is
appropriate for Suburban Residential II use (2.0 to 4.0
dwellings per acre). Tax ID 730-663-3520.
Mr. Turner stated Mr. Elswick is requesting a deferral to the
June 28, 2017 regularly scheduled meeting.
Mr. Kerry Hutcherson, representing the applicant, accepted
the deferral.
In response to Mr. Elswick's question, Mr. Hutcherson stated
the applicant had hoped for a 30 -day deferral, but needs
additional time to address identified issues relative to
transportation.
Ms. Jaeckle called for public comment.
There being no one to address the deferral, the public
hearing was closed.
On motion of Mr. Elswick, seconded by Mr. Winslow, the Board
deferred Case 17SN0515 until June 28, 2017.
Ayes: Jaeckle, Haley, Winslow, Holland and Elswick:
Nays: None.
17SN0557
(AMENDED) In Matoaca Magisterial District, J. Mark Sowers,
Harpers Mill Development Corp. and HMG Investments, LLC
request amendment of conditional use planned development
(Case 02SN0209) to amend cash proffers & amendment of zoning
district map -in a Residential (R-12) District on 888.4 acres
located within the Harpers Mill Subdivision along Amington
Lane, Badestowe Drive, Beach Road, Beyer Road and Place,
Burridge Place, Corsica Drive, Glen Royal Drive, Greenley
Place, Hartridge Drive, Highmarker Court, Level Gauge Lane,
Longlands Road, Morocco Lane and Place, Pullman Lane, Sheldon
Drive, Signal Lamp Road, Talland Drive, Timberstone Drive,
and Traley Court. Density will be controlled by zoning
conditions or Ordinance standards. The Comprehensive Plan.
suggests the property is appropriate for Suburban Residential
I use (maximum of 2.0 dwellings per acre) . Tax IDs 708-663-
6796; 709-663-2165; 709-664-5765; 710-662-3361; 710-663-4184;
711-662-0823, 1313, 1334, 2236, 2515, 2659, 2749, 3238, 3619,
4652, 4661, 4670, 4879, 4943, 5087, 5134, 5295 and 5325; 711-
663-1493, 1684, 1975, 2203, 2467, 3060, 3695, 3787, 4180,
4672, 5504 and 5923; 711-644-1403, 1512, 2031, 2540, 3411,
3620, 3643, 4441 and 8760; 712-660-3954; 712-661-6352; 712-
663-7727; 712-664-0867, 2310, 3384, 3971, -4461, 5491, 6544,
6564, 7443, 7898, 8444, 8678 and 9345; 712-665-7134, 7207,
9321 and 9802; 713-662-9633; 713-663-2879; 713-664-8659; 713-
665-2496; 714-663-2995, 6376, 7172, 7592, 8269, 8789 and
9597; 714-664-4336, 4722, 5350, 5459, 5819, 5870, 6921, 7775,
16-817
04/26/17
78571 7865, 8000, 8096, 8248, 8410, 8739,8930 and 9552; 715-
662-0772; 715-663-0175, 1364, 1391, 2074, 2582, 2891, 3199,
35541 4064, 4381, 4892, 5277, 5749, 6090, 6172, 6646, 6969,
7084, 7543, 7861, 7891, 8270, 8887, 8939, 9295, 9657 and
9838; 715-664-00161 0144, 0425, 1431, 1467, 1908, 2416, 3023,
35081 3839, 4269, 4359, 4535, 5301, 5329, 5351, 5671, 6251,
6669, 6716, 7041, 7352,,7569, 7632, 8103, 8471, 8528, 8955,
94751 9536, 9811, 9857, 9946; and 715-665-6372; 716-661-0756;
716-663-0475, 0685, 0839, 1060, 1739,2063, 2739,-3160, 3191,
35471 4195, 4472, 4551, 4580, 4641, 4662, 5188, 5498, 6859,
7068, 7277, 7286 and 7296, 716-664-0320, 0378, 0759, 0827,
1236, 1279, 1404, 1643, 1661, 2151, 2181, 2200, 2518, 2563,
2926, 3434, 3615, 3842, 4080, 4152, 4272, 4362, 4508,_5609,
5719, 6028, 6337, 6745, 7153, 7405, 7513, 7822, 7968, 8130,
8438, 8746, 8773, 9576 and 9656; 717-663-5056; 717-664-0382,
0560, 0988, 1365, 1396, 2170, 2678, 3187 and 3497; 717-665-
1084, 1223, 1305, 1314, 3009, 3325, 3908, 4434, 4906, 5529,
5809, 6322 and 2174; and 719-666-1003.
Mr. Turner presented a summary of Case 17SN0557 and stated
both the Planning Commission and staff recommended approval
and acceptance of the proffered conditions. He noted the
Board would need to unanimously suspend its rules to consider
the case.
On motion of Mr. Winslow, ,seconded by Mr. Elswick, the Board
suspended its rules to allow for consideration of Case
17SN0557.-
Ayes: Jaeckle, Haley, Winslow, Holland and Elswick.
Nays: None.
Mr. Mark Sowers accepted the recommendation. --
Ms. Jaeckle called for public comment.
There being no one to address the issue, the public hearing
was closed.
On motion of Mr. Elswick, seconded by Mr. Winslow, the Board
approved Case 17SNO557 and accepted the following proffered
conditions:
(Staff Note: Proffered Condition 1 outlined below would
delete Proffered Condition 5 of Case 02SN0209. The following
proffered condition has been offered by the applicant in
addition to deleting Proffered Condition 5 of Case 02SN0209.)
Delete Proffered Condition #5 from 02SNO209
1. Architectural/Design
Elements:
These
Architectural/Design
Elements shall
apply
to all
residential types except
where specified as
provided
herein. (Residential
types are
Single
Family
residential, Cluster
residential,
Cluster
Condo
residential, Townhouse
and Multi -family
uses)
All design elements below are considered minimum
standards. (Exceptions can be granted by the Directory
of Planning on a case by case basis)
i. Driveways: (single family residential only)
All portions of driveways and parking areas shall
be brushed concrete, stamped concrete, exposed
aggregate concrete, asphalt or decorative pavers.
16-818
04/26/17
ii. Front Walks: (All residential types)
A minimum of a three (3) foot wide concrete front
walk shall be provided to each. dwelling unit or
building of multiple units, to connect to drives,
sidewalks or streets.
iii. Landscaping and Yards: (Single Family residential
and multi -family uses)
Front foundation planting beds shall be required
along the entire front facade of all units, and
shall extend along all sides facing a street.
Foundation Planting Beds shall be a minimum of 4'
wide from the unit foundation. Planting beds shall
be defined with a trenched edge or suitable
landscape edging material. Planting beds shall
include medium shrubs, spaced a maximum of four (4)
feet apart. Unit corners shall be visually
softened with vertical accent shrubs (4'-5') or
small evergreen trees (6'-81) at the time of
planting. An alternative to one corner landscaping
treatment shall be one small deciduous tree planted
in the front yard of the dwelling or building.
iv. Sod: (All residential types)
All front, side and corner side yard lawns shall be
sodded and irrigated.
V. HVAC Equipment: (All, residential types)
HVAC equipment shall be placed at the rear of the
dwelling or shall be screened with a framed lattice
or other approved screening enclosure or
landscaping if located on the side of the dwelling.
No HVAC equipment shall be allowed in the front
yard.
vi. Architecture and Materials: (All residential types)
Exterior Facades: Acceptable siding materials
include brick, stone, masonry, stucco, synthetic
stucco (E.I.F.S), horizontal lap siding, vertical
siding, shingles, board and batten siding, and
shake siding. Siding may be permitted to be
manufactured from natural wood, cement fiber board,
or may be premium quality vinyl siding, or other
material approved by the Planning Department.
Plywood and metal siding shall not 'be permitted.
Plywood, metal, PVC, Fypon, vinyl, or other similar
materials may be used for trim and accent features
only.
Additional siding requirements:
a. Premium quality vinyl siding is defined as
siding with a minimum wall thickness of 0.044
inches.
b. Synthetic Stucco (E.I.F.S.) siding shall be
finished in smooth, sand or level texture.
Rough textures.are not permitted.
vii. Eaves: (Single family residential only)
16-819
04/26/17
All gables. located on front and side facades shall
have flying rafters. Overhangs shall be a minimum
of 12 Exceptions to- this requirement can be
granted by the Director of Planning on a case. by
case basis if the architecture of the house does
not warrant the use of flying rafters.
viii.Garage Doors: (All residential types)
Front loaded and corner side loaded garages, shall
use an upgraded garage door.
An upgraded garage door is any door with a minimum
of 2 enhanced features. Enhanced features shall
include; windows, raised panels, decorative panels,
arches, hinge straps or other architectural
features on- the exterior that enhance the entry
(i.e. decorative lintels, shed roof overhangs,
arches, columns, keystones, eyebrows etc.). Flat
panel garage doors are prohibited.
ix. Columns: (Single family,residential only)
Columns on the front or corner sides of the
dwelling, including tapered columns, shall be a
minimum. of 10" diameter. No smaller than 10"
diameter columns shall be allowed unless the
architectural style specifically needs a smaller
size for proper balancing as determined by the
Director of Planning.
X. Foundations: (All residential types)
The exposed portion, of any foundation shall be of
brick, synthetic stone, natural stone' or
combinations thereof. Synthetic or natural stucco
foundations may be permitted for facades
constructed of entirely stucco. Siding step down
foundations shall be permitted on the side and rear
elevations provided that a minimum eighteen (18)
inches of exposed brick or stone shall be.required.
A maximum of two (2) steps shall be permitted on
any elevation.
xi. Roof Material: (All residential types)
Roofing material shall be a material consisting of,,
but not limited to, architectural dimensional
shingles, metal, or rubber membrane, and having a
minimum 30 -year warranty.
xii.. Porches, Stoops and Decks: (All residential types
except multi -family uses)
Front Porches: All front entry stoops and front
porches shall be constructed with continuous
masonry foundation wall or on minimum 12"x12"
masonry piers. Extended front porches shall be a
minimum of five (5)' deep. Space between piers
under porches shall be enclosed with framed lattice
panels. Handrails and railings shall be finished
painted wood or metal railing with vertical pickets
or swan balusters. Pickets shall be supported on
top and bottom rails that span between columns.
There shall be no unpainted vertical surfaces on
decks, porches and stoops on the front or sides of
the house.
16-820
-04/26/17
xiii.Architectural styles: (All residential types except
multi -family uses)
Single family detached dwellings with the same
elevations or color palette may not be located
adjacent to, directly across from, or diagonally
across from each other on the same street.
Townhouse dwellings and attached dwellings with the
same elevations and color palette may not be
located adjacent to or directly across from each
other on the same street. In either case, this
requirement does not apply to dwellings on
different streets backing up to each other.
xiv. Chimneys: (All residential types)
Chimneys: Chimney chases shall be constructed of
brick or stone. Sided chimneys shall be permitted
if, it does not face a street.- The foundation of
any chimney shall match the house foundation. For
gas fireplaces, metal flues may be used on the
roof.
Direct Vent Fireplaces: Direct vent gas fireplace
boxes, which extend beyond the exterior plane of
the dwelling, are not permitted on front facades or
side facades facing a street. The exterior
material and finish used will match the surrounding
facade. (P)
2. Commercial Uses: (Commercial uses only)
Material: All commercial buildings shall have exterior
wall surfaces constructed of brick, stone or cultured
stone, architectural masonry, cementitious siding and
trim, exclusive of windows, doors, cornices, accent
bands, and architectural treatments which may be
constructed of metal, fiberglass, E.I.F.S., stucco, or
other comparable materials as approved by the Director
of Planning. The exposed portion of the exterior wall
surfaces (front, rear and sides) of any commercial
building shall be similar in quality as to architectural
treatment and materials. (P)
Ayes: Jaeckle, Haley, Winslow, Holland and Elswick.
Nays: None.
17cun79n
In Bermuda Magisterial District, Magnolia Lakes, LLC c/o
Roger A. Glover, III requests amendment of zoning (Case
04SN0314) to amend cash proffers and amendment of zoning
district map in a Multifamily Residential (R -MF) District on
5.1 acres located in the northeast and northwest corners of
Iron Bridge Road and Magnolia Shore Lane and at the eastern
terminus of Magnolia Bluff Court. Density will be controlled
by zoning conditions or Ordinance standards. The
Comprehensive Plan suggests the property is appropriate for
Residential use (7.0 dwellings per acre or more). Tax ID
781-653- Part of 1943.
Mr. Turner presented a summary of Case 17SNO750 and stated
both the Planning Commission and staff recommended approval
and acceptance of the proffered condition.
16-821
04/26/17
•
•
Mr. Jim Theobald, representing the 'applicant, accepted the
recommendation.
Ms. Jaeckle called for public comment.
There being no one to address the issue, the public hearing
was closed.
On motion of Ms. Jaeckle, seconded by Ms. Haley, the Board
approved Case 17SN0750 and accepted the following proffered
condition:
The property ,owner and applicant in this case, pursuant to
Section 15.2-2298 of the Code of Virginia (1950 as amended)
and the Zoning Ordinance of Chesterfield County, for itself
and its successors or assigns, proffer that the property
under, consideration will be developed- according to the
following proffers if, and only if, the request submitted
herewith is granted with only those conditions agreed to by
the owners and applicant. In the event this request is denied
or approved with conditions not agreed to*by the owners and
applicants, the proffers shall immediately be null and void
and of no further force or effect.
The Applicant hereby amends Proffered Condition 27 of Case
04SN0314 to read as follows:
1. Cash Proffers: For each dwelling unit, the applicant,
sub -divider, or assignee(s) shall pay $3,854 per dwelling
unit to the County of Chesterfield for road improvements
within the service district for the property. Each
payment shall be made prior to the issuance of a building
permit for a dwelling unit unless state law modifies the
timing of the payment. Should Chesterfield County impose
impact fees at any time during the life of the development
that are applicable to the- property, the amount paid in
cash proffers shall be in lieu of or credited toward, but
not be in addition to, any impact fees, in a manner
Mr. Jim Theobald, representing the applicant, accepted the
recommendation.
Ms. Jaeckle called for public comment.
There being no one to address the issue, the public hearing
was closed.
On motion of Ms. Jaeckle, seconded by Ms. Haley, the Board
approved Case 17SN0750 and accepted the following proffered
condition:
The property ,owner and applicant in this case, pursuant to
Section 15.2-2298 of the Code of Virginia (1950 as amended)
and the Zoning Ordinance of Chesterfield County, for itself
and its successors or assigns, proffer that the property
under, consideration will be developed according to the
following proffers if, and only if, the request submitted
herewith is granted with only those conditions agreed to by
the owners and applicant. In the event this request is denied
or approved with conditions not agreed to*by the owners and.
applicants, the proffers shall immediately be null and void
and of no further force or effect.
The Applicant hereby amends Proffered Condition 27 of Case
04SN0314 to read as follows:
1. Cash Proffers: For each dwelling unit, the applicant,
sub -divider, or assignee (s) shall pay $3,854 per dwelling
unit to the County of Chesterfield for road improvements
within the service district for the property. Each
payment shall be made prior to the issuance of a building
permit for a dwelling unit unless state law modifies the
timing of the payment. Should Chesterfield County impose
impact fees at any time during the life of the development
that are applicable to the property, the amount paid in
cash proffers shall be in lieu of or credited toward, but
not be in addition to, any impact fees, in a manner
determined by the County. (T and B&M)
New Proffered Condition 2 is hereby provided:
2. Additional Quality Features:
a. Sod and Irrigation. Sod and irrigation shall be
required for front, side and rear yards of all
buildings of attached condominium units, except
where such yards have been improved with hardscape,
planting beds or other portions of the yard where
grass is not grown.
b. Foundation Plantings. Foundation planting beds
shall be required along the entire facade of
buildings of condominium units which face public
streets, excluding decks, porches, patios;
architectural features and garages, and shall
contain a minimum of fifty (50) percent evergreen
material and have one shrub per three- linear feet
of foundation planting bed.
c. Minimum Sizes. Condominium units shall have a
minimum gross floor area of 1900 square feet.
d. Garages. All condominium units shall include a
minimum of a two (2) car garage. (P)
Ayes: Jaeckle, Haley, Winslow, Holland and Elswick.
Nays: None.
16-822
04/26/17
16SN0684
(AMENDED) In Dale Magisterial District, Terraforge Ventures
LLC requests amendment of conditional use planned development
(Case 05SN0219) to amend cash proffers, recreational areas
and building materials and amendment of zoning district map
in a Residential (R-12) District on 158.4 acres located along
the east line of Conifer Road, north and south of Sterling
Brook Drive and within the Silverleaf Subdivision along
Silver Mist Avenue, Pennyweight Court, Cannington Drive,
Argent Lane, Etching Street, Chasing Lane and Gleaming Drive.
Density will be controlled by zoning conditions or Ordinance
standards. The Comprehensive Plan suggests the property is.
appropriate for Suburban Residential II use (2.0 to 4.0
dwellings per acre). Tax Ibs 784-675-1052, 7571, 7664, 7678,
7756, 7786, 7952, 7993 and 8299; 784-676-3731, 4223, 4783,
5172, 5220, 5922, 6620, 7319, 7917, 8533, 8606, 8616, 8844,
8961, 9314 and 9443; 784-677-4902; 785-675-1969 and 2669;
785-676-2890, 3117, 3220, 3222, 3324 and 3327; 785-677-3236,
3310, 3658 and 4240 and 786-675-0497.
Mr. Turner presented a summary of Case 16SN0684 and stated
both the Planning Commission and staff recommended approval
and acceptance of the proffered conditions.
Mr. Jack Wilson, representing the applicant, accepted the
recommendation.
Ms. Jaeckle called for public comment.
There being no one to address the issue, the public hearing
was closed.
On motion of Mr. Holland, seconded by Mr. Winslow, the Board
approved Case 16SN0684 and accepted the following proffered
conditions:
The property owner and applicant in this case, pursuant to
Section 15.2-2298 of the Code of Virginia (1950 as amended)
and the Zoning Ordinance of Chesterfield County, for
themselves and their successors and assigns, proffer that the
property under consideration ("the Property") will be
developed according -to the following proffers if, and only
if, the request submitted herewith is granted with only those
conditions agreed to by the owner and applicant. In the
event this request is denied or approved with conditions not
agreed to by the owner and applicant, the proffers shall
immediately be null and void and of no further force or
effect.
1. All dwelling units shall comply with the standards set
forth in Silverleaf Lot Development, Architecture and
Architectural Construction Standards dated March 13,
2017, attached as Exhibit A. (P)
(Staff Note: This condition, which includes reference
to building materials (3.1.a.) supersedes Proffered
Condition 16 of Case 05SN0219 relative to the same)
2. Recreation Area and Focal Point: Within four (4) months
of approval of this request, the clubhouse and pool
shall be completed for occupancy. (P)
(Staff Note: This condition amends Proffered Condition
12 of Case 0SSN0219 relative to the timing for the
provision of the clubhouse and pool. All other
requirements of Proffered Condition 12 would remain in
effect)
Ayes: Jaeckle, Haley, Winslow, Holland and Elswick.
Nays: None.
16-823
04/26/17
16SN0691
(AMENDED) In Matoaca Magisterial District, RREF II -TFC
Greenwich LLC requests amendment of conditional "use planned
development (Case 12SN0226) to amend cash proffers and
architectural standards and amendment of zoning district map
in a Multifamily Residential (R -MF) District on 76.9 acres
fronting 800 feet on the east line of Otterda,le Road, 1,000
feet south of Foxcreek Crossing. Density will be controlled
by zoning conditions or ordinance standards. The
Comprehensive Plan suggests the property is appropriate for
Medium -High Density Residential use (Minimum 4.0 to 8.0
dwellings per acre). Tax IDs 711-671-8840; 712-671-5171; 712-
672-3060; 713-672-0706, 1167 and 5982; 713-673-1820.
Mr. Turner presented a summary of Case 16SN0691 and stated
both the Planning Commission and staff recommended approval
and acceptance of the proffered conditions.
Mr. Jack Wilson, representing the applicant, accepted the
recommendation.
Ms. Jaeckle called for public comment.
There being no one to address the issue, the public hearing
was closed.
On motion of Mr. Elswick, seconded by Mr. Holland, the Board
approved Case 16SN0691 and accepted the following proffered
conditions:
With the approval of this request only Proffered Condition 1
relative to Textual Statement Items III.D.3. (Facade
Repetition) and Item III.D.5. (Exterior Facades) and
Proffered Condition 4 of Case 12SN0226 shall be amended as
provided herein.
The Applicant hereby amends Proffered Conditions 1 and 4 of
Case 12SN0226 to read as follows. Except as modified by this
request all other conditions of Case 12SN0226 shall remain in
force and effect.
1. Master Plan. The Textual Statement dated March 10,
2017, shall be considered the revised Master Plan for
only Item III.D.3. (Facade Repetition) and Item III.D.5.,
(Exterior Facades). All other Items of the Textual
Statement dated November 15, 2013 approved with Case
12SN0226 shall remain in force and effect. (P and BI)
4. Cash Proffers. For each detached dwelling unit, the
applicant, sub -divider, or assignee(s) shall pay $4,324
per detached dwelling unit and for each
attached dwelling unit, the applicant, sub -divider, or
assignee (s) shall pay $2,914 per dwelling unit to the
County of Chesterfield for road improvements within the
.service district for the property. Each payment shall
be made prior to the issuance of a building permit for a
dwelling unit unless state law modifies the timing of
the payment. Should Chesterfield County impose impact
fees at any time during the life of the development that
are applicable to the property, the amount, paid in cash
proffers shall be in lieu of or credited toward, but not
be in addition to, any impact fees, in a manner
determined by the County. (T and B&M)
Ayes: Jaeckle, Haley, Winslow, Holland and Elswick.
Nays: None.
16-824
04/26/17
17wpn17i
In Matoaca Magisterial District, Chesterfield County Parks,
and Recreation Department requests historic landmark
designation for the Pleasant View School and privy (the
designation would extend a distance of 20 feet from both
structures on each side of the structures) in an Agricultural
(A) District on 2 acres known as 18431 River Road. The
Comprehensive Plan suggests the property is appropriate for
Rural Residential/Agricultural use (single family dwelling on
a minimum of 5 acres fronting 250 to 300 feet along existing
public road). Tax ID 700-641-5002.
Mr. Turner presented a summary of Case 17HP0123 and stated
staff, the Preservation Committee and the Planning Commission
recommended approval.
Mr. Stuart Connock, Chief of Parks/Design and Construction,
accepted the recommendation. He noted the presence of special
historical interest related to local, state and national
history.
Ms. Jaeckle called for public comment.
There being no one to address the issue, the public hearing
was closed.
Mr. Elswick made a motion, seconded by Mr. Holland, for the
Board to approve Case 17HP0123.
Mr. Holland and Mr. Winslow voiced their approval and
stressed the importance of preserving the historic landmark.
Ms. Jaeckle called for a vote on the motion made by Mr.
Elswick, seconded by Mr. Holland, for the Board to approve
Case 17HP0124.
Ayes: Jaeckle, Haley, Winslow, Holland and Elswick.
Nays: None.
17upnl7a
In Matoaca Magisterial District, New Dawn Properties, LLC
requests the removal of historic landmark designation for the
parcel of Adventure Hill (retaining the designation for the
house structure and a minimum of 3 acres, but removing the
designation from all outbuildings) in an Agricultural (A)
District on 68.9 acres known as 11801 Winterpock Road. The
Comprehensive Plan suggests the property is appropriate for
Rural Residential/Agricultural use (single family dwelling on
a minimum of 5 acres fronting 250 to 300 feet along. existing
public road). Tax ID 716-650-2544.
Mr. Turner presented a summary of Case 17HP0124 and stated
staff, the Preservation Committee and the Planning Commission
recommended approval, subject to the condition.
Mr. Matt Hamilton accepted the condition.
Ms. Jaeckle called for public comment.
There being no one to address the issue, the public hearing
was closed.
16-825
04/26/17
On motion of Mr. Elswick, seconded by Ms. Haley, the Board
approved Case 17HP0124, subject to the following condition:
This designation shall not apply to any property needed for
any improvements to Winterpock Rd. per the Thoroughfare
Plan. (T)
Ayes: Jaeckle, Haley, Winslow, Holland and Elswick.
Nays: None.
17SN0562
In Clover Hill Magisterial District, Matthew S. Sowers
requests amendment of zoning (Case 06SN0127) to amend cash
proffers and amendment of zoning district map in a
Residential (R-12) District on 21.8 acres located at the
northern terminus of Vickilee Road, the western terminus of
Marblethorpe Road, the eastern terminus of North Vickilee
Road and Vickilee Court. Density will be controlled by zoning
conditions or Ordinance standards. The Comprehensive Plan
suggests the property is appropriate for Residential use (2.5
dwellings/acre or less). Tax IDs 746-699-8830; 747-699-0340,
0744, 1248, 1750, 2453 and 4454.
Mr. Turner presented a summary of Case 17SN0562 and stated
both the Planning Commission and staff recommended approval
and acceptance of the proffered conditions.
Mr. Matthew Sowers accepted the recommendation.
Ms. Jaeckle called for public comment.
There being no one to address the issue, the public hearing
was closed.
On motion of Mr. Winslow, seconded by Ms. Haley, the Board
approved Case 17SN0562 and accepted the following proffered
conditions:
(Staff Note: Proffered Condition 1 outlined below would
delete Proffered Condition 2 of Case 06SN0127. The following
proffered conditions have been offered by the applicant in
addition to deleting Proffered Condition 2 of Case 06SN0127.)
Revise proffered condition ##2 of Case 06SN0127 to read:
1. Road Cash Proffer. For each dwelling unit, the
applicant, sub -divider, or assignees) shall pay $9,400
per dwelling unit (the "Road Cash Proffer Payment") to
the County of Chesterfield for road improvements within
the service district for the property. Each payment
shall be made prior to the issuance of a certificate of
occupancy for a dwelling unit unless state law modifies
the timing of the payment.
a. Within 6 months from the date of rezoning approval,
the applicant shall have the option to notify the
Transportation Department that as an alternative to
making the Road Cash Proffer Payment, the applicant
shall construct an additional lane of pavement (the
"Improvement") along the northbound lanes of
Courthouse Road from the Cherylann Road
intersection south for approximately 400 feet. The
16-826
04/26/17
applicant shall dedicate to and for the benefit of
Chesterfield County, free and unrestricted, any
additional right of way or easements required for
the Improvement. Prior to the issuance of an
occupancy permit, the Improvement shall be
completed or bonded, as determined by the
Transportation Department.
b. In, the event that this project falls into a
revitalization 'or focused reinvestment area as
determined by the Board of Supervisors, the Road
Cash Proffer Payment shall be adjusted to the
appropriate value according to the Chesterfield
County Cash Proffer Policy at the time of zoning.
(T)
2. Architectural/Design Elements: All design elements below
are considered minimum standards. Anything above and
beyond these minimums will also be deemed acceptable.
Exceptions can be granted by the Director of Planning on
a case by case basis and may be appealed to the Planning
Commission.
a. Front Walks & Driveways
i. Front Walks: A minimum of a 42 inch wide
concrete front walk shall be provided to the
front entrance of each dwelling unit, to
connect to drives, sidewalks, or street.
ii. Driveways: All driveways will be paved.
b. Landscaping and Yards
i. Front Foundation Planting Beds: Foundation
planting is required along the entire front
facade of all units. Foundation Planting Beds
shall be a minimum of 4' wide from the unit
foundation. Planting beds shall be defined
with a trenched edge or suitable landscape
edging material. Planting beds shall include
medium shrubs spaced a maximum of four (4)
feet apart. Unit corners shall be visually
softened with vertical accent shrubs (4'-5')
or small evergreen trees (6'-81) at the time
of planting. One vertical accent shrub may be
replaced with a small deciduous tree or medium
shrub (6'-81) planted in the front yard.
C. Architecture and Materials
i. Exterior Facades: Acceptable siding materials
include brick, stone, masonry,
stucco, synthetic stucco (E.I.F.S),-horizontal
lap siding, board and batten siding, and shake
siding. Siding may be permitted to be
manufactured from natural wood, cement fiber
board, or may be premium quality vinyl siding.
Trim and architectural accents may be made of
other materials. Plywood and metal siding are
not permitted. Additional siding
requirements:.
1. Premium quality vinyl is defined as vinyl
16-827
04/26/17
siding with a minimum wall thickness of
.042".
2. Synthetic Stucco (E.I.F.S.) siding shall
be finished in smooth, sand or level
texture. Rough textures are not
permitted.
ii. Eaves: All eaves on the front elevation of
the house will feature 8" minimum flying
rafters.
iii. Variation: Homes directly across from one
another or side by side or diagonally across
shall not be of .the same elevation or color
combination.
iv. Garages:
1. Seventy-five (75) percent of all dwelling
units shall have an attached garage.
2. Front loaded attached garages shall be
permitted to extend as far forward from
the front line of the main dwelling as
the front line of the front porch
provided that the rooflines of the porch
and garage are contiguous. Where the
rooflines arenot contiguous, garages
shall be permitted to project a maximum
of four (4) feet forward of the front
line of the main dwelling.
3. For units that employ a garage and
architectural design similar and
consistent with designs shown in Exhibit
A, Elevations 1 through 4, dated March
13, 2017, garages shall be permitted to
extend beyond the front facade as.
indicated. Elevation 1 shall be
restricted to a maximum of 5 units.
4. Front loaded and corner side loaded
garages shall use an upgraded garage
door. An upgraded garage door is any
door with a minimum of two (2) enhanced
features. Enhanced features shall
include windows, raised panels,
decorative panels, arches, hinge straps
or other architectural features on the
exterior that enhance the entry (i.e.
decorative lintels, shed roof overhangs,
arches, columns, keystones, eyebrows,
etc.) Flat panel garage doors are
prohibited on front loaded and corner lot
side loaded garages.
v. Step-down Siding: Stepping the siding down
below the first floor shall only be permitted
in circumstances of unique topographical
conditions, as determined by the Planning
Department. Step downs shall be permitted on
the side and rear elevations only, with a
16-828
04/26/17
maximum of two (2) steps permitted on any
elevation, and with a minimum separation of
eight (8) feet between steps. A minimum of 24
inches of exposed brick or stone shall be
required.
d. Roof Material: Roofing material shall be
dimensional architectural shingles or better with a
minimum 30 year warranty.
e. Porches & Stoops
i. Front Porches: All front entry stoops and
front porches shall be constructed with
continuous masonry foundation wall or on
12"x12" masonry piers. Extended front porches
shall be a minimum of five (5)' deep. Space
between piers under porches shall be enclosed
with framed lattice panels. Handrails and
railings shall 'be finished painted wood or
metal railing with vertical pickets:, Pickets
shall be supported on top and bottom rails
that span between columns.
ii. Finishes: There will be no unfinished
vertical surfaces on front porches.
f. Fencing
i. All yard fencing will be wood, vinyl, or
aluminum. There shall be no chain link fence
allowed.
ii. Fences may not extend past the front facade of
the house. (P)
Ayes: Jaeckle, Haley, Winslow, Holland and Elswick.
Nays: None.
17SN0598
(AMENDED) In Bermuda Magisterial District, River's Bend East,
LLC requests amendment of zoning (Case 04SN0197) to amend
cash proffers and amendment of zoning district map in a
Residential (R-12) District on 215.9 acres located within the
Meadowville Landing Subdivision along Meadowville Road, North
Enon Church Road, Shallow Cover Drive, Bluewater Terrace,
James Overlook Drive, Court and Circle, Anchor Landing Drive
and Court, Channel View Terrace, Sternwalk Court, Rolling
Tide Court and Sinker Creek Drive. Density will be controlled
by zoning conditions or ordinance standards. The
Comprehensive Plan suggests the property is appropriate for
Low Density Residential use (maximum of 1.0 dwelling per
acre) and Medium -High Density Residential (minimum 4.0 to 8.0
dwellings per acre). Tax IDs 822-661-3043; 822-662-6625, 7732
and 8838; 823-660-1465, 2793, 8580 and 8892; 823-661-0310,
0653, 2779, 3490, 5194, 5418, 6422, 7226, 7971, 8130, 8701,
8711 and 8934; 823-662-5888 and 8124; 824-660-0191, 0279,
2079, 2390, 3689, 3778, 3898, 5677, 5796 and 5887; 824-661-
0060, 0200, 0309, 0541, 1345, 1492, 1627, 2018, 2149, 2833,
2953, 3225, 3757, 3807, 3817, 4642, 4661, 5034, 5268, 5526,
5776, 5805, 5849, 5916, 7263 and 8171; 824-662-0424, 1480,
2105 and 2686; 824-663-2711, 4117 and 7331; 825-660-9979;
825-661-6811; 825-662-7891 and 9097; 825-663-0139 and 7439;
826 -661 -Part of 3992 and 8420; 826-662-5899; 826-663-1603,
3002 and 4301; and 827-662-6147.
16-829
04/26/i7
Mr. Turner presented a summary of Case 17SN0598 and stated
both staff and the Planning Commission recommended approval
and acceptance of the proffered conditions. He noted the
parcels being removed presented in the addendum.
On motion of Ms. Jaeckle, seconded by Mr. Winslow, the Board
suspended its rules to allow for consideration of Case
17SN0598.
Ayes: Jaeckle, Haley, Winslow, Holland and Elswick.
Nays: None.
Mr. Brennan Keene, representing the applicant, accepted the
recommendation. He stated he believes the conditions
proffered is reasonable under state law.
Ms. Jaeckle called for public comment.
There being no one to address the issue, the public hearing
was closed.
On motion of Ms. Jaeckle, -seconded by Ms. Haley, the Board
approved Case 17SN0598 and accepted the following proffered
conditions:
The Developer (the "Developer") in this zoning case, pursuant
to Section 15.2-2298 of the Code of Virginia (1950 as
amended) and the Zoning Ordinance of Chesterfield County, for
itself and its successors or assigns, proffers that the
rezoning and development of the property known as
Chesterfield County Tax IDs 824-662-1480, 824-663-2711, 824-
663-4117, 824-663-7331, 825-663-0139, 825-662-7891, 825-662-
9097, 826-663-1603,,826-663-3002, 826-663-4301, 826-662-5899,
825-663-7439, 823-660-1465, 822-661-3043, 822-662-7732, 822-
662-8838, 823-661-5194, 823-662-8124, 824-662-0424, 824-661-
1492, 823-662-5888, 824-662-2686, 823-660-2793, 823-661-3490,
823-661-2779, 823-661-0653, 823-661-7971, 824-662-2105, 824-
661-0060, 823-66i-0310, 825-661-6811, 826-661-8420, 825-660-
9979, 827-662-6147, 823-660-8580, 823-660-8892, 823-661-8701,
823-661-8711, 824-661-0309, 824-661-0200, 824-660-0191, 824-
660-0279, 824-660-2079, 824-660-2390, 824-661-2018, 824-661-
1627, 824-661-2833, 824-661-3225, 824-661-3817, 824-661-3807,
824-660-3898, 824-660-3689, 824-660-3778, 824-660-5677, 824-
660-5887, 824-660-5796, 824-661-5805, 824-661-5916, 824-661-
5526, 824-661-5034, 824-661-4642, 824-661-5849, 824-661-7263,
824-661-8171, 824-661-5776, 824-661-5268, 824-661-4661, 824-
661-3757, 824-661-2953, 824.-661-2149, 824-661-1345, 824-661-
0541, 823-661-8934, 823-661-8130, 823-661-7226, 823-661-6422,
823-661-5418, 822-662-6625, and a portion of 826-661-3992
("the Property") under consideration will be used according
to the following proffer(s) if, and only if, the request
submitted herewith is granted with only those conditions
agreed to by the Developer. In the event this request is
denied or approved with conditions not agreed to by the
owners and Developer, the proffer shall immediately be null
and void and of no further force or effect.
1. Entryway and Focal Point.
A. Entryway. In order to establish a sense of place
for the Property, the existing entryway consisting
of a decorative sign, landscaping, and two median
islands located between the intersection of
Meadowville Road and Deepwater Cove Drive and the
intersection of Anchor Landing Drive and Deepwater
16-830
04/26/17
2.
K0
N
,Cove Drive shall be maintained by the Homeowner's
Association.
B. Focal Point. The existing clubhouse, fitness
center, pool, and ponds shown on Exhibit A shall be
maintained by the Homeowner's Association and will
serve as a focal point for the Property. (P)
Pedestrian and Vehicular Connectivity. In order to
enhance pedestrian and vehicular connectivity and access
to recreational amenities within the adjacent
subdivisions, at least one side of each street within
the Property shall be constructed with a sidewalk, and
the streets and sidewalks constructed within the
Property shall be connected to one or more streets
within the subdivisions or adjacent parcels that adjoin
the Property to the north and the south. Sidewalks
shall be constructed in accordance with the County's
Residential Sidewalk Policy. The sidewalks and sidewalk
connections described herein shall be completed in
conjunction with the construction of streets within the
Property. (P)
Recreational Amenities. In order to provide residents
of the Property with opportunities to engage in an
active lifestyle, the following existing recreational
amenities shall be made available, subject to and in
accordance with membership rules of the Homeowners'
Association, to residents of the Property: clubhouse,
trails, fitness center, pool, riverwalk trails, cricket
field, and two (2) community docks for river access.
Such recreational amenities shall be maintained by the
Homeowners' Association. The locations of the existing
recreational amenities are shown generally on the
exhibit map incorporated herein and attached hereto as
Exhibit A. (P)
Architectural Design Standards. All dwelling units
developed on the Property shall be, subject to the
following architectural design standards:
A. Style and Form. The architectural styles of all
dwellings shall use forms and elements compatible
with those in the Meadowville Landing subdivision.
B. Exterior Facades. All dwelling units constructed
shall have brick, stone, or masonry fronts that
cover a minimum of 200 of the facade. Other
acceptable siding materials shall include stucco,
synthetic stucco (E.I.F.S.), or horizontal lap
siding. Horizontal lap siding may be manufactured
from natural wood or cement fiberboard or may be
premium quality vinyl siding with a minimum wall
thickness of .042 inches. Synthetic Stucco
(E.I.F.S.) siding shall be finished in a smooth,
sand, or level texture, no rough textures are
permitted.
C. Foundations. All foundations shall be constructed
entirely of brick, stone, or a mixed combination of
both. Synthetic or natural stucco foundations may
be permitted for facades constructed entirely of
stucco.
D. Roofs.
i. Varied Roof Line. Varied roof designs and
materials shall be used on facades of
dwellings that face a street. Minimum roof
pitch shall be 8/12.
ii. Roof Materials. Roofing material shall be
dimensional architectural shingles with a
16-831
04/26/17
minimum 30 -year warranty. All flashing shall
be copper or pre -finished aluminum (bronze or
black) .
E. Porches and Stoops.
i. Front Porches and Stoops. All -front entry
stoops and front porches shall be constructed
with a -continuous masonry foundation wall.
Individual front porches and stoops shall be
one-story in height, or taller if the
porch/stoop design is architecturally
compatible with the dwelling it serves.
Extended front porches shall be a minimum of 5
feet deep. Handrails and railings .shall be
finished painted wood or metal railing with
vertical pickets or swan balusters. Pickets
shall be supported on top and bottom rails
that span between columns. Columns supporting
roofs of porches and stoops shall be masonry
piers, tapered round (Tuscan or Doric) column,
or square box columns a minimum of 8 inch
square as appropriate to the character of the
dwelling unit. All front steps shall be
masonry to match the foundation.
ii. Rear Porches. All rear porches shall be
constructed on masonry or stone piers with
lattice screening spanning between columns.
Handrails and railings shall be finished
painted wood or metal railing with vertical
pickets or swan balusters.
F. Fireplaces, Chimneys and Flues.
i. Chimneys. Sided chimneys are permitted on roof
planes or facades and must have masonry
foundations. Cantilevered chimneys are not
permitted. The width and depth of chimneys
shall be appropriately sized in proportion to
the size and height of the unit. For gas
fireplaces, metal flues may be used on the
roof.
ii. Direct Vent Fireplaces. Direct vent gas
fireplace boxes which protrude- beyond the
exterior plane of the dwelling unit, are not
permitted on facades facing a street. All the
exterior materials and finishes used to
enclose the fireplace box must match the
adjacent facade.
G. Minimum dwelling sizes. The minimum gross floor
area for each single-family dwelling shall be 2,500
square feet.
H. Variation in Front Elevations'. Unless otherwise
approved by the Director of Planning, the following
restrictions are designed to maximize architectural
variety of the houses.
i. The same front elevation may not be located
adjacent to, directly across from, or
diagonally across the street from each other
on the same street.
ii. Variation in the front elevation to address
the paragraph above may not be achieved by
simply mirroring the facade but may be
accomplished by providing at least three (3)
of the following architectural changes:
16-832
04/26/17
(a) adding or removing a porch or covered
entry or increasing or decreasing the
length of the porch or entry
(b) varying the location and/or style of a
front facing gable(s)
(c) alternating the location of the garage
(d) providing different materials and/or
siding types on at least 500 of the
elevation
(e) providing a different roof type/roof line
( P and B I )
5. Front Walks/Driveways.
A. Private Driveways. All private driveways serving
residential uses shall be hardscaped with brushed
concrete or asphalt. Private driveways shall not
require curb and gutter.
B. Front Walks. Front walks shall be provided to each
dwelling unit. Front walks shall be hardscaped
with of brushed concrete or asphalt. Front walks
shall be a minimum of 3 feet wide. (P)
6. Front Loaded Attached Garages. No front -loaded garages
shall be permitted except in the case where a dwelling
includes three garages. In the case where a dwelling
has three garages, no. more than one garage shall be
front -loaded. (P and BI)
7. Landscaping and Yards.
A. Sod and Irrigation. All front yards shall be
sodded and irrigated.
B. Foundation Planting Bed. Foundation planting is
required along all dwelling facades facing a
street. Foundation Planting Beds shall be a
minimum of 4 feet wide measured from the dwelling
unit foundation. Planting beds shall be defined
with a trenched edge or suitable landscape edging
material. Planting beds shall include medium
shrubs spaced a maximum of four (4) feet apart.
Dwelling unit corners shall be visually softened
with vertical accent shrubs 4-5 feet in high at the
time of planting or small evergreen trees 6-8 feet
high at the time of planting. (P)
8. North Enon Church Road Improvements. Prior to
recordation of more than a cumulative total of 89 lots,
the following improvements shall be completed, as
determined by the Transportation Department.
A. Widening. Widening/improving the west side of
North Enon Church Road from the southern boundary
of the parcel identified as GPIN 824-659-8890 to
the intersection of Mount Blanco Road to a twelve
(12) foot wide travel lane, measured from the
centerline of the existing pavement, with an
additional four (4) foot wide paved shoulder plus a
four (4) foot wide unpaved shoulder and overlaying
the full width of North Enon Church Road with one
and one-half (1.5) inches of compacted bituminous
asphalt concrete, with modifications approved by
the Transportation Department.
B. Dedication. Dedication to Chesterfield County,
free and unrestricted, of any additional right-of-
way (or easements) required for the improvements
identified above. (T)
Ayes: Jaeckle, Haley, Winslow, Holland and Elswick.
Nays: None.
16-833
04/26/17
17qun799
In Bermuda Magisterial District, Chesterfield Department of
Emergency Communications requests' conditional use planned
development to permit a communications tower plus exceptions
to ordinance requirements and amendment of zoning district
map in a Residential_ (R-9) District on 56.7 acres lying at
the western terminus of Weir Place, west of Jefferson Davis
Highway. Density will be controlled by zoning conditions or
Ordinance standards. The Comprehensive Plan suggests the
property is appropriate for Conservation/Recreation use. Tax
ID 797-651-8448.
Mr. Turner presented a summary of Case 17SN0726 and stated
both the Planning Commission and staff recommended approval;
subject to the conditions.
Mr; Rich Troshak, Director of Emergency Communications,
accepted the conditions.
Discussion ensued relative to the approval of several
communication tower cases on the agenda.
Ms. Jaeckle called for public comment.
There being no one to address the issue, the public hearing
was closed.
Ms. Jaeckle made a motion, seconded by Mr. Holland, for the
Board to approve Case 17SN0726. -
Discussion ensued relative to the critical need for the
emergency communications towers.
Ms. Jaeckle called for a vote on her motion, seconded by Mr.
Holland, for the Board to approve Case 17SN0726, subject to
the following conditions:
1. The tower shall not exceed a height of 410 feet and
shall be located generally as depicted on the Site
Location Plan prepared by Pyramid Network Services,
LLC., last revised 11-02-16. In addition, the tower,
fencing, and other ground equipment/ improvements shall
be- a minimum of eight (8) feet outside of the
exercise/nature trail around the top of the existing on-
site SWM/BMP basin. (P and EE)
2. There shall be no -signs permitted to identify this use
except those required by FCC or other regulatory body.
(P)
3. The base of the tower shall be enclosed by a minimum six
(6) foot high fence, designed to preclude trespassing.
The fence shall be placed so as to provide sufficient
room between the fence and the property line to
accommodate evergreen plantings having an initial height
and spacing to provide screening of the base_ of the
tower and accessory ground -mounted equipment or
structures from adjacent properties and park facilities.
(P)
4. The property shall be subject to a "Vegetation Retention
Area" of 100 feet along the northern, southern, and
western property boundaries. No trees within the
vegetation retention area may be removed unless such
trees are dead, diseased or dying. (P)
5. The color, design and lighting system for the tower
shall be as follows:
16-834
04/26/17
a. The tower shall be gray or another neutral color,
acceptable to the Planning Department.
b. Unless otherwise required by the FAA, .tower
lighting during daylight hours shall be limited to
medium intensity strobe lights with upward
reflection and lighting during night-time- hours
shall be limited to soft blinking red lights with
upward reflection.
c. The tower shall be a self-supporting lattice
structure.
d. Any satellite dish and microwave dish antennas
attached to the tower shall not exceed eight (8)
feet in diameter and shall be of a neutral color
with no logos. (P)
6. Any building or mechanical equipment shall comply with
the Zoning Ordinance relative to architectural treatment
of building exteriors and screening of mechanical
equipment in O, C and I Districts. (P)
(NOTE: The Zoning Ordinance requires the screening of
mechanical equipment located on the building or ground
from adjacent properties and public rights of way.
Screening would not be required for the tower or tower -
mounted equipment.)
7. Prior to use of this telecommunications tower, the owner
of the tower shall obtain approval of the structural
integrity by a registered professional engineer licensed
in Virginia and a copy of the report filed with the
Planning Department. The tower shall be certified as
structurally sound to accommodate the applicant's
equipment and equipment for four (4) additional
communication service providers. (P)
8. At such time that the telecommunications tower ceases to
be used for communications purposes for a period
exceeding twelve (12) consecutive months, the property
owner(s) and/or lessee(s) shall dismantle and remove the
tower and all associated equipment from the property.
(P)
Ayes: Jaeckle, Haley, Winslow, Holland and Elswick.
Nays: None.
179NO737
In Midlothian Magisterial District, Chesterfield Department
of Emergency Communications requests amendment of conditional
use planned development (Case 99SN0158) to increase the
height of an approved communications tower and amendment of
zoning district map in a Residential (R-40) District on 4.5
acres fronting the west line of James River Road, 800 feet
north of Riverton Ridge Drive. Density will be controlled by
zoning conditions or Ordinance standards. The Comprehensive
Plan suggests the property is appropriate for
Conservation/Recreation use. Tax ID 728-725- Part of 6105.
Mr. Turner presented a summary of Case 17SN0737' and stated
both the Planning Commission and staff recommended approval,
subject to the conditions.
Mr. Rich Troshak accepted the conditions.
Ms. Jaeckle called for public comment.
16-835
04/26/17
Mr. Hunter Coleback, Riverton Civic Association board member,
expressed concerns relative to the placement of the proposed
tower. He questioned if other sites may be more appropriate.
Mr. Robert Thompson, Vice -President of the Riverton Civic
Association, expressed concerns relative to the placement and
height of the proposed tower in Robious .Landing Park. He also
questioned if other sites were considered.
Ms. Janet Benedetti, Riverton resident, expressed concerns
relative to the placement and height of the. proposed tower in
Robious Landing Park. She questioned if other sites may be
more appropriate.
There being no one else to address the issue, the public
hearing was closed. i
Ms. Haley reviewed the proposed emergency communications
system enhancements and benefits. She stressed the importance
of the placement and height of the tower and how those
aspects play in the congruence of an entire regional network.
She stated ensuring the safety of citizens and public safety
personnel is --imperative.
Mr. Troshak stated the improved transmission of public safety
communications benefits the health and safety of citizens and
public safety personnel. He' further stated the increased
tower height is necessary to reduce the number of tower
facilities needed to provide the radio coverage proposed and
to increase the ability for the signal to penetrate larger
structures such as James River High School and other larger
commercial, office and industrial facilities, and government
buildings.
Ms. Haley noted Condition 5 would not permit co -location of
antenna by other users on the tower for reciprocal use. She
stressed the importance of providing essential services to
the public and emergency service personnel.
Ms. Haley then made a motion, seconded by Mr. Elswick, for
the Board to approve Case 17SN0737.
In response to -Mr. Winslow's question regarding co -location,
Ms. Haley stated the Board could revisit the issue to co -
locate and make an amendment once the emergency system is
functional and community need is viable.
Mr. Elswick noted towers have been placed in other county
parks. He stressed the importance of providing essential
services to the public and emergency service personnel,
especially along and on the James River.
Discussion ensued relative to the ability of co -location of
antenna by other users on the tower for reciprocal use.
Mr. Holland stressed the importance of providing critical
services given the topography of the proposed site.
Ms. Jaeckle called for a vote on the motion made by Ms.
Haley, seconded by Mr. Elswick, for the Board to approve Case
17SN0737, subject to the following conditions:
1. With the approval of this -request-, the Proffered
Condition of Case 99SNO158 shall be amended as follows.
All other conditions of Case 99SNO158 shall remain in
force and effect.
16-836
04/26/17
The tower shall not exceed
shall be located generally
Location Plan prepared by
LLC., last revised 11-02-16.
a height of 310 feet and
as depicted on the Site
Pyramid- Network Services,
(P)
The approved tower shall also be subject to these additional
conditions:
2. The tower shall be a self-supporting lattice structure.
(P)
3. Any satellite dish and microwave dish antennas attached
to the tower shall not exceed eight (8) feet in diameter
and shall be of a neutral -color with no logos. (P)
4. Prior to use of this telecommunications tower, the owner
of the tower shall obtain approval of the structural
integrity by a registered professional engineer licensed
in Virginia and a copy of the report filed with the
Planning Department. The tower shall be certified as
structurally sound to accommodate the applicant's
equipment and equipment for four (4) additional
communication service providers. (P)
5. The tower shall only be used for Public Safety Emergency
Communication purposes. Co -location of antenna by other
users shall not be permitted. (P)
Ayes: Jaeckle, Haley, Winslow, Holland and Elswick.
Nays: None.
17SN0738
In Matoaca Magisterial District, Chesterfield Department of
Emergency Communications requests conditional use planned
development to permit a communications tower plus exceptions
to ordinance requirements and amendment of zoning district
map in an Agricultural (A) District on 1'acre fronting 260
feet on the west line of Hull Street Road, 6,400 feet
southwest of Skinquarter Road. Density will be controlled by
zoning conditions or Ordinance standards. The Comprehensive
Plan suggests the property is appropriate for Rural
Residential/Agricultural use. Tax ID 686-665-2775.
Mr. Turner_ presented a summary of Case 17SN0738 and stated
the Planning Commission and staff recommended approval,
subject to the conditions.
Mr. Rich Troshak accepted the conditions.
Ms. Jaeckle called for public comment.
There being no one to address the issue, the public hearing
was closed.
On motion of Mr. Elswick, seconded by Mr. Holland, the Board
approved Case 17SN0738, subject to the following conditions:
1. _ The tower shall not exceed a height of 310 feet and
shall be located generally as depicted on the _Site
Location Plan prepared by Pyramid Network Services,
LLC.,' last revised 11-02-16. (P)
2. There shall be no signs permitted to identify this use
except those required by FCC or other regulatory body.
(P)
16-837
04/26/17
3. The base,of the tower shall be enclosed by a minimum six
(6) foot high fence, designed to preclude trespassing.
The fence shall be placed so as to provide sufficient
room between the fence and the property line to
accommodate,evergreen plantings having an initial height
and spacing to provide screening of the base of the
tower and accessory ground -mounted equipment or
structures from adjacent properties and park facilities.
(P)
4. Except to accommodate access to the tower, the property
shall be subject to a "Vegetation Retention Area" of 40
feet along the eastern perimeter of the property. No
trees within, the vegetation retention area may be
removed unless such trees are dead, diseased or dying.
(P)
5. The color, design and lighting system for the tower
shall be as follows:
a. The tower shall be gray or another neutral color,
acceptable to the Planning Department,.
b. Unless otherwise required by the FAA, tower
lighting during daylight hours shall be limited to
medium intensity strobe lights with upward
reflection and lighting during night-time hours
shall be limited to soft blinking red lights with
upward reflection.
C. The tower shall be a self-supporting lattice
structure.
d. Any satellite dish and microwave dish antennas
attached to the tower shall not exceed eight (8)
feet in diameter and shall be of a neutral color
with no logos. (P)
6. Any building or mechanical equipment shall comply with
the Zoning Ordinance relative to architectural treatment
of building exteriors and screening of mechanical
equipment in O, C and I Districts. (P) ..
(NOTE: The Zoning Ordinance requires the screening of
mechanical equipment located on the building or ground
.-from adjacent properties and public rights of way.
Screening would not be required for the tower or tower -
mounted equipment.)
7. Prior to use of this telecommunications tower, the owner
of the tower shall obtain approval of the structural
integrity by a -registered professional engineer licensed
in Virginia and a copy" of the report filed with the
Planning Department. The tower shall be certified as
structurally sound to accommodate the applicant's
equipment and equipment for four (4) additional
communication service providers and that the fall zone
of the -tower is no greater than the 100 X 100 foot
fenced compound. (P)
8. At such time that the telecommunications tower ceases to
-be used for communications purposes for a period
exceeding twelve (12) consecutive months, the property
owner(s) and/or lessee'(s) shall dismantle and remove the _
tower and all associated equipment from the property.
(P)
9. The tower shall be located so- as not to disturb the
visible chimney and concrete pillars of' the -histori-c
school. Prior to use of the tower, the applicant will
work with appropriate local and state officials to erect
a Virginia Historic Highway Marker to commemorate the
property as the historic site of the Beulah -'Rosenwald,
School at Skinquarter. (P)
Ayes: Jaeckle, Haley, Winslow, Holland and Elswick.
Nays: None.
16-838
04/26/17
17SN0739
In Matoaca Magisterial District, Chesterfield Department of
Emergency Communications requests a conditional use planned
development to permit a communications tower plus exceptions
to ordinance requirements and amendment of zoning district
map in an Agricultural (A) District on 80.7 acres known as
6001 Hickory Road. Density will be controlled by zoning
conditions or Ordinance standards. The Comprehensive Plan
suggests the property is appropriate for Suburban Residential
II use (2.0 to 4.0 dwellings per acre). Tax ID 782-617-2204.
Mr. Turner presented a summary of Case 17SN0739 and stated
the Planning Commission, and staff recommended approval,
subject to the conditions.
Mr. Troshak accepted the conditions.
Ms. Jaeckle called for public comment.
There being no one to address the issue, the public hearing
was closed.
On motion of Mr. Elswick, seconded by Mr. Winslow, the Board
approved Case 17SN0739, subject to the following conditions:
1. The tower shall not exceed a height of 410 feet and
shall be located generally as depicted on the Site
Location Plan prepared by Pyramid Network Services,
LLC., last revised 11-02-16. (P)
2. There shall be no signs permitted to identify this use
except those required by FCC or other regulatory body.
(P)
3. The base of the tower shall be enclosed by a minimum six
(6) foot high fence, designed to preclude trespassing.
The fence. shall be placed so as to provide sufficient
room between the fence and the property line to
accommodate evergreen plantings having an initial height
and spacing to provide screening of the base of the
tower and accessory ground -mounted equipment or
structures from adjacent.properties and park facilities.
(P)
4. A "Vegetation Retention Area" of 100 feet around the
southern, eastern and western perimeter of the tower
site shall be maintained. No trees within the
vegetation retention area may be removed unless such
trees are dead, diseased or dying, or are required to be
removed to accommodate stormwater, drainage or school
facilities. (P)
5. The color, design and lighting system for the tower
shall be as follows:
a. The tower shall be gray or another neutral color,
acceptable to the Planning,Department.
b. Unless otherwise required by "the FAA, tower
lighting during daylight hours shall be limited to
medium intensity strobe lights with upward
reflection and lighting during night-time hours
shall be limited to soft blinking red lights with
upward reflection.
C. The tower shall be a self-supporting lattice
structure.
d. Any satellite dish and microwave' dish antennas
attached to the tower shall not exceed eight (8)
16-839
04/26/17
feet in diameter and shall be of a neutral color
with no logos. (P)
6. Any building or mechanical equipment shall comply with
the Zoning Ordinance relative to architectural treatment
of building exteriors and screening of mechanical
equipment in O, C and I Districts. (P)
(NOTE: The Zoning Ordinance requires the screening of
mechanical equipment located on the building or ground
from adjacent properties and public rights of way.
Screening would not be required for the tower or tower -
mounted equipment.)
7. Prior to use of this telecommunications tower, the owner
of the tower shall obtain approval of the structural
integrity by a registered professional engineer licensed
in Virginia and acopy of the report filed with the
Planning Department. The tower shall be certified as
structurally sound to accommodate the applicant's
equipment and equipment for four (4) additional
communication service providers and that the fall zone
of the tower is no greater than the 100_ X 100 foot
fenced compound. (P)
8. At such time that the telecommunications tower ceases to
be used for communications purposes for a period
exceeding twelve (12) consecutive months, the property
owner(s) and/or lessee(s) shall dismantle and remove the
tower and all associated equipment from the property.
(P)
Ayes: Jaeckle, Haley, Winslow, Holland and Elswick.
Nays: None. _
17SN0740
In Dale Magisterial District, Chesterfield Department of
Emergency Communications requests conditional use planned
development to permit a communications tower plus exceptions
to ordinance requirements and amendment of zoning district
map in an Agricultural (A) District on 211.9 acres located
off the southern terminus of Folkstone Drive, south of
Fairpines Road. Density will be controlled by zoning
conditions or Ordinance standards. The Comprehensive Plan
suggests the property is appropriate for Conservation/
Recreation use. Tax ID 767-680-0720.
Mr. Turner presented a summary of Case 17SN0740 and stated
the Planning Commission and staff recommended approval",
subject to the conditions.
Mr. Troshak accepted the conditions.
Ms. Jaeckle called for public comment.
There being no one to address the issue, the public hearing
was closed.
On motion of Mr. Holland, seconded by Mr. Elswick, the Board
approved Case 17SN0740, subject to the following conditions:
1. The tower shall not exceed a height of 310 feet and
shall be located generally as depicted on the Site
16-840
04/26/17
2
3
4
5
A
7.
go
Ayes
Nays
Location Plan prepared by Pyramid Network Services,
LLC., last revised 11"02-16. (P)
There shall be no signs permitted to identify this use
except those required by FCC or other regulatory body.
(P)
The base of the tower shall be enclosed by a minimum six
(6) foot high fence, designed to preclude trespassing.
The fence shall be placed so -as to provide sufficient
room between the fence and the property line to
accommodate evergreen plantings having an initial height
and spacing to provide screening of the base of the
tower and accessory ground -mounted equipment or
structures from adjacent properties and park facilities.
(P)
A "Vegetation Retention Area" of 100 feet around the
perimeter of the tower site shall be maintained. No
trees within the vegetation retention area may be
removed unless such trees are dead, diseased or dying.
(P)
The color, design and lighting system for the tower
shall be as follows:
a. The tower shall be gray or another neutral color,
acceptable to the Planning Department.
b. Unless otherwise required by the FAA, tower
lighting during daylight hours shall be limited to
medium intensity strobe lights with upward
reflection and lighting during night-time hours
shall be limited to soft blinking red lights with
upward reflection.
C. The tower shall be a self-supporting lattice
structure.
d. Any satellite dish and microwave dish antennas
attached to the tower shall not exceed eight (8)
feet in diameter and shall be of a neutral color
with no logos. (P)
Any building or mechanical equipment shall comply with
the Zoning Ordinance relative to architectural treatment
of building exteriors and screening of mechanical
equipment in O, C and I Districts. (P)
(NOTE: The Zoning Ordinance requires the screening of
mechanical equipment located on the building or ground
from adjacent properties and public rights of way.
Screening would not be required for the tower or tower -
mounted equipment.)
Prior to use of this telecommunications tower, the owner
of the tower shall obtain approval of the structural
integrity by a registered professional engineer licensed
in Virginia and a copy of the report filed with the
Planning Department. The tower shall be certified as
structurally sound to accommodate the applicant's
equipment and equipment for four (4) additional
-communication service providers. (P)
At such time that the telecommunications tower ceases to
be used for communications purposes for a period
exceeding twelve (12) consecutive months, the property
owner(s) and/or lessee(s) shall dismantle and remove the
tower and all associated equipment from the property.
(P)
Jaeckle, Haley, Winslow, Holland and Elswick.
None.
16-841
04/26/17
17gWn741
In Matoaca Magisterial District, Chesterfield Department of
Emergency Communications requests a conditional use planned
development to permit a communications tower plus exceptions
to ordinance requirements and - amendment of zoning district
map in an Agricultural .(A) District on 213.2 acres fronting
4,800 feet on the west line of Mt Hermon Road, 2,300 feet
south of Genito Road. Density will be controlled by zoning
conditions or Ordinance standards. The Comprehensive Plan
suggests the property is appropriate for Conservation/
Recreation use. Tax ID 701 -686 -Part of 3250.
Mr. Turner presented a summary of Case 17SN0741 and stated
the Planning ,Commission and staff recommended approval,
subject to the conditions.
Mr. Troshak accepted the conditions.
Ms. Jaeckle called for public comment.
There being no one to address the issue, the public hearing
was closed.
On motion of Mr. Elswick, seconded by Mr. Winslow, the Board
approved Case 17SN0741, subject to the following conditions:
1. The tower shall not exceed a height of 310 feet and
shall be located generally as depicted on the Site
Location Plan prepared by Pyramid Network Services,
LLC., last revised 11-02-16. (P)
2-. There shall be no signs permitted to identify this use
except those required by FCC or other regulatory body.
(p)
3. The base of the tower shall be enclosed by a minimum six
(6) foot high fence, designed to preclude trespassing.
The fence shall be placed so as -to provide sufficient
room between the fence and the property line to
accommodate evergreen plantings having an initial height
and spacing to provide screening of the base of the
tower and accessory ground -mounted equipment or
structures from adjacent properties and park facilities_.
(P)
4. A "Vegetation Retention Area" of 100 feet around the
perimeter of the tower site shall be maintained. No
trees within the- vegetation retention area may be
removed unless such trees are dead, diseased or dying or
are removed in conjunction with park development. (P)
5. The color, design and lighting system for the tower
shall be as follows:
a. The tower shall be gray or another neutral color,
acceptable to the Planning Department.
b. Unless otherwise required by the FAA, tower
lighting during daylight hours shall be limited to
medium intensity strobe lights with upward
reflection and lighting during night-time hours
shall be limited to soft blinking red lights with
upward reflection.
16-842
04/26/17
C. The tower shall be a self-supporting lattice
structure.
d. Any satellite dish and microwave dish antennas
attached to the tower shall not exceed eight (8)
feet in diameter and shall be of a neutral color
with no logos. (P)
6. Any building or mechanical equipment shall comply with
the Zoning Ordinance relative to architectural treatment
of building exteriors and screening of mechanical
equipment in O, C and I Districts. (P)
(NOTE: The Zoning Ordinance requires the screening of
mechanical equipment located on the building or ground
from adjacent properties and public rights of way.
Screening would not be required for the tower or tower -
mounted equipment.)
7. Prior to use of this telecommunications tower, the owner
of the tower shall obtain approval of the structural
integrity by a registered professional engineer licensed
in Virginia and a copy of the report filed with the
Planning Department. The tower shall be certified as
structurally sound to accommodate the applicant'.s
equipment and equipment for four (4) additional
communication service providers. (P)
8. At such time that the telecommunications tower ceases to
be used for communications purposes for a period
exceeding twelve (12) consecutive months, the property
owner(s) and/or lessee(s) shall dismantle and remove the
tower and all associated equipment from the property.
(P)
Ayes: Jaeckle, Haley, Winslow, Holland and Elswick.
Nays: None.
17SN0744
(AMENDED) In Dale Magisterial District, Therese Riedmuller
and Michael Riedmuller request a conditional use to permit
parking and storage of a recreational vehicle outside the
rear yard and amendment of zoning district map in a
Residential (R-7) District on 0.3 acre known as 6018
Meadowburn Drive. Density will be controlled by zoning
conditions or ordinance standards. The Comprehensive Plan
suggests the property is appropriate for Suburban Residential
II use (2.0 to 4.0 dwellings per acre). Tax ID 782-683-5765.
Mr. Turner -presented a summary of Case 17SN0744 and stated
the Planning Commission and staff recommended approval,
subject to the conditions.
Mr. Winslow clarified the condition of non -transferable
ownership.
Mr. Michael Riedmuller accepted the conditions.
Ms. Jaeckle called for public comment.
Mr. David Styles expressed concerns relative to the
deterioration of the neighborhood and disabled and abandoned
vehicles on the property. He urged the Board to deny the
request.
16-843
04/26/17
There being no one else to address the issue, the public
hearing was closed.
Mr. Riedmuller stated he is asking for permission to park his
recreational vehicle within the side yard.
Mr. Holland noted neighbors who attended the community
meeting were supportive of the applicants' request, as well
as the Planning Commission. J
Mr. Holland then made a motion, seconded by Mr. Elswick, the
Board approved Case 17SN0744, subject to the _following
conditions:
1. Non -Transferable Ownership. This Conditional Use
approval shall be granted exclusively to Therese and
Michael Riedmuller, and shall not be transferable nor
run with the land. (P)
2. Use. This Conditional Use approval shall be for the
parking of a motorhoine having no more than two (2) axels
and no greater than thirty-three (33) feet in length.
(P)
3. Location of Recreational Vehicles. The recreational
vehicle shall be parked within the side and yard, as
shown on Exhibit A. (P)
Ayes: Jaeckle, Haley, Holland and Elswick.
Nays: Winslow.
7 7 awn r7 r,1
In Dale Magisterial District, 3HD Holding Company requests
amendment of zoning (Case 05SN0295) to amend cash proffers
and amendment of zoning district map in a Residential (R-12)
District on 62.8 acres located in the southwest quadrant of
Kingsland and Salem Church Roads. Density will be controlled
by zoning conditions or ordinance standards. The
Comprehensive Plan suggests the property is appropriate for
Suburban Residential II use (2.0 -to 4.0 dwellings per acre).
Tax IDs 776-671-9866; 777-671-1902 and 6199; 778-671-2430;
and 778-672-0924.
Mr. Turner presented a summary of Case 17SN0751 and stated
the Planning Commission and staff recommended approval and
acceptance of the proffered conditions.
Mr. Andy Scherzer, representing the applicant, accepted the
recommendation. He stated he believes the condition proffered
is reasonable under state law.
Ms. Jaeckle called for public comment.
There being no one to address the issue, the public hearing
was closed.
On motion of Mr. Holland, seconded by Mr. Winslow, the Board
approved Case 17SN0751 and accepted the following proffered
condition:
With the approval of this request, Proffered Conditions 2 of
Case 05SN0295 shall be deleted. All other conditions of Case
05SN0295 shall remain in force and effect.
16-844
04/26/17
The Applicant hereby offers the
conditions:
1. Architectural/Design Elements:
a. Driveways/Front Walks
following proffered
i. Driveways: All portions of driveways and
parking areas shall be brushed concrete,
stamped concrete, exposed aggregate concrete,
asphalt or decorative pavers.
ii. Front Walks: A minimum of a three (3) foot
wide concrete front walk shall be provided to
the front entrance of each dwelling unit, to
connect to drives, sidewalks or street.
b. Landscaping
i. Front Yard Tree: One (1) tree per lot shall be
planted or retained along both sides of all
streets. A tree shall be planted or retained
on both street frontages on corner lots. The
tree shall be planted or retained along the
front property line within the street side
half of the required front yard setback. The
front yard tree shall be a large deciduous
tree and have a minimum caliper of 2.5 inches.
Native trees- shall be permitted to have a
minimum caliper of 2 inches.
ii. Front Foundation Planting Beds: Foundation
planting is required along the entire front
facade of all units. Foundation beds shall be
a minimum of four (4) feet wide from the unit
foundation. Planting beds shall be defined
with a trenched edge or suitable landscape
edging material. Planting beds shall include
medium shrubs and may include spreading
groundcovers. A four (4) foot extension of
this bed and plantings shall be provided from
the end of the structure where a side step
down foundation is within fifteen (15) feet of
the front facade.
ii. Front Yards: Except for the foundation
planting bed, all front yards shall be sodded
and irrigated.
C. Architecture and Materials
i. Repetition: Dwellings with the same elevations
may not be located adjacent to, directly
across from, or diagonally across from each
other on the same street. This requirement
does not apply to units on different streets
backing up to each other.
ii. Step-down Siding: Stepping the siding down
below the first floor shall only be permitted
in circumstances of unique topographical
conditions. Step downs shall be permitted on
the side and rear elevations only, with a
maximum of two (2) steps permitted on any
elevation, and with a minimum separation of
16-845
04/26/17
eight (8) feet between steps. A minimum of 24
inches of exposed brick or stone shall be
required, unless a lesser amount is approved
by the Planning Department due to unique
design circumstances.
iii. Exterior Facades: Acceptable siding materials
include brick, stone,- masonry, stucco,
synthetic stucco (E.I.F.S), vinyl siding,- and
approved horizontal lap siding. Horizontal lap
siding may be manufactured from natural wood
or cement fiber board or may be premium
quality vinyl siding. Plywood and metal siding
are not permitted. Additional siding
requirements:
1. Where a dwelling borders more than one
street, all street -facing facades shall
be finished in the same materials.
2. All vinyl' siding shall have a minimum
wall thickness of 0.042".
3. Synthetic Stucco siding shall be finished
in smooth, sand or level .texture. Rough
textures are not permitted.
d. Roof Materials: Roofing material shall be
dimensional architectural shingles or better with a
minimum 30 -year warranty.
e. Porches, Stoops, and Decks
i. Front Porches: All front entry stoops and
,front porches shall be constructed with
continuous masonry foundation wall or on 12" x
12" masonry piers. Extended front porches
shall be a minimum of five (5) feet deep.
Space between piers under porches shall be
enclosed with framed lattice panels. Handrails
and railings shall be finished painted wood,
vinyl rails or metal rail systems with
vertical pickets or swan balusters. Pickets
shall be supported on top and bottom rails
that span between columns.
f. Garages. A minimum of seventy-five (75) percent -of
all dwelling units shall have an attached garage.
Front loaded attached garages shall be permitted to
extend beyond the front facade. if An upgraded
garage door is provided. Corner side loaded garages
shall use an upgraded garage door. An upgraded
garage door is any door with a minimum of two (2)
enhanced features. Enhanced features shall include:
windows, raised panels, decorative panels, arches,
hinge straps or other architectural features on the
exterior that enhance the entry (i.e. decorative
lintels, shed roof overhangs, arches, columns,
keystones, eyebrows, etc.) Flat panel garages doors
are prohibited.
g. Heating, Ventilation and Air Conditioning (HVAC)
Units and Whole House Generators. Units shall
initially be screened from view of public roads by
landscaping or low maintenance material, as may be
approved by the Planning Department. (P)
Ayes: Jaeckle, Haley, Winslow, Holland and Elswick.
Nays: None.
16-846
04/26/17
17SNO764
In Bermuda Magisterial District, Asgard Properties c/o
Priority Toyota David Perno requests amendment to conditional
use planned development (Case 13SN0517) relative to time
extension for a gravel parking area and amendment of zoning
district map in a General Business (C-5) District on 8.6
acres fronting 460 feet on the south line of Ruffin Mill
Road, 2,000 feet southeast of Woods Edge Road. Density will
be controlled by zoning conditions or ordinance standards.
The Comprehensive Plan suggests the property is appropriate
for Industrial use. Tax IDs 805-637-0272-1912.
Mr. Turner presented a summary of Case 17SNO764 and stated
the Planning Commission and staff recommended approval and
acceptance of the one proffered condition.
Mr. Brennen Keene, representing the applicant, accepted the
recommendation.
In response to Ms. Jaeckle's question, Mr. Keene stated the
applicant requests an exception to permit the gravel parking
lot for an additional 10 years or until construction of any
buildings on the property.
Ms. Jaeckle called for public comment.
There being no one to address the issue, the public hearing
was closed.
On motion of Ms. Jaeckle, seconded by Mr. Holland, the Board
approved Case 17SNO764 and accepted the following proffered
condition:
The Owners and the Developer (the "Owners") in this zoning
case, pursuant to §15.2 2298 of the Code of Virginia (1950 as
amended) and the Zoning Ordinance of Chesterfield County, for
themselves and their successors or assigns, proffer that the
development of the Property known as Chesterfield County Tax
Identification Number part of 805-637-0272 (the "Property")
under consideration will be developed according to the
following conditions if, and only if, the rezoning request
for Conditional Use Planned Development ("CUPD") is granted.
In the event the request is denied or approved with
conditions not agreed to by the Owners, the proffers shall
immediately be null and void and of no further force or
effect.
1. The Textual Statement dated December 12, 2016, shall be
considered the Master Plan. (P)
Ayes: Jaeckle, Haley, Winslow, Holland and Elswick.
Nays: None.
17SNO767
In Bermuda Magisterial District, Denise Costley and Keith
Costley request conditional use to permit the parking and
storage of a recreational vehicle outside the rear yard and
amendment of zoning district map in a Residential (R-7)
District on 0.2 acre known as 2837 Laughter Lane. Density
will be controlled by zoning conditions or ordinance
standards. The Comprehensive Plan suggests the property is
appropriate for Residential use (2.5 to 4.0 dwellings per
acre or less. Tax ID 798-648-2951.
16-847
04/26/17
Mr. Turner presented a summary of Case 17SN0767 and stated
the Planning Commission and staff recommended approval,
subject to the conditions. .He noted the applicants were
unable to attend the meeting; however, the conditions were
agreed to in writing.
Ms. Jaeckle called for public comment.
There being no one to address the. issue, the public hearing
was closed.
Ms. Jaeckle made note of the small lot -and stated there was
no opposition to the request.
On motion of Ms. Jaeckle, seconded by Mr. Winslow, the Board
approved Case 17SN0767, subject to the following conditions:
1. Non -Transferable Ownership.. This Conditional Use
approval shall be granted exclusively to Denise and
Keith .Costley, and shall not be transferable nor run
with the land. (P)
2. Use. This Conditional Use approval shall be for the
storage of one (1) recreational vehicle (boat) and no
greater than thirty-four (34) feet in length (includes
trailer) . (P)
3. Location of Recreational Vehicle. The recreational
vehicle shall be covered and stored within the fenced
side yard as shown in Exhibit A. (P)
4. Fence. The existing six (6) foot privacy fence shall
maintained on the property in good condition to minimize
the visibility of the recreational vehicle form the
street and adjacent properties. (P)
Ayes: Jaeckle, Haley, Winslow, Holland and Elswick.
Nays: None.
17SN0768
In Clover Hill Magisterial District, Main Street Homes
requests amendment of zoning (Case 15SN0626) to amend cash
proffers and amendment of zoning district map in a
Residential (R-12) District on 5.8 acres located within the
Lee's Forest Subdivision along Temie Lee Parkway and St.
Elizabeth Drive. Density will be 'controlled by zoning
conditions or ordinance standards. The Comprehensive Plan
suggests the property is appropriate for Suburban Residential
I use (maximum of 2.0 dwellings per acre). Tax IDs 724-672-
4999, 5692, 6385, 7382 and 8479; and 724-673-4105, 5523,
6138, 6420, 7213, 7806 and 8805.
Mr. Turner presented a summary of Case 17SN0768 and stated
the Planning Commission and staff recommended approval and
acceptance of the proffered conditions.
Mr. Andy Scherzer, representing the applicant,. accepted the
recommendation. He stated he believes the conditions
proffered are reasonable under state law.
Ms. Jaeckle called for public comment.
16-848
04/26/17
There being no one to address the issue, the public hearing
was closed.
On motion of Mr. Winslow, seconded by Ms. Haley, the Board
approved Case 17SN0768 and accepted the following -proffered
conditions:
With the approval of this request, Proffered Condition 1 of
Case 15SN0626 shall be amended as outlined below.
1. Cash Proffers. For each dwelling unit, the applicant,
sub -divider, or assignee(s) shall pay $9,400 to the
County of Chesterfield for road improvements within the
service district for the property. Each payment shall be
made prior to the issuance of a building permit for a
dwelling unit unless state law modifies the timing of
the payment. Should Chesterfield County impose impact
fees at any time during the life of the development that
are applicable to the property, the amount paid in cash
proffers shall be in lieu of or credited toward, but not
be in addition to, any impact fees, in a manner
determined by the County. (T)
The Applicant hereby offers the following proffers:
2. Architectural/Design Elements:
a. Driveways/Front Walks
i. Driveways: All portions of driveways and
parking areas shall be brushed concrete,
stamped concrete, exposed aggregate concrete,
asphalt or decorative pavers.
ii. Front Walks: A minimum of a 42 -inch -wide
concrete front walk shall be provided to the
front entrance of each dwelling unit, to
connect to drives, sidewalks, or street.
b. Landscaping
i. Front Yard Tree: One (1) tree per lot shall be
planted or retained. A tree shall be planted
or retained on both street frontages on corner
lots. The front yard tree shall be a large
deciduous tree and have a minimum caliper of
2.5 inches. Native trees shall be permitted to
have a minimum caliper of 2 inches.
ii. Front Foundation Planting Beds: Foundation
planting is required along. the entire front
facade of all units, and shall extend along
all sides facing a street. Foundation Planting
Beds shall be a minimum of four. (4) feet wide
from the unit foundation. Planting beds shall
be defined with a trenched edge or suitable
landscape edging material. Planting beds shall
include medium shrubs and may include
spreading groundcovers. Unit corners shall be
visually softened with vertical accent shrubs
(4'-51) or small evergreen trees (6'-81) at
the time of planting.
16-849
04/26/17
C. Architecture and Materials
i. Style and Form: The architectural styles shall
be interpretations of traditional Richmond
architecture, using forms and elements
compatible with those in the Lees Forest
subdivision such as Georgian, Adam, Classical
Revival Colonial, Greek Revival, Queen Anne,
and Craftsman Styles.
ii. Repetition: Dwellings with the same elevations
may not be located adjacent to, directly
across from, or diagonally across from each
other on the same street. This requirement
does not apply to units on different streets
backing up to each other.
iii. Step-down Siding: Stepping the siding down
below the first floor shall only be permitted
in circumstances of unique topographical
conditions. Step downs shall be permitted on
.the side and rear elevations only, with a
maximum of two (2) steps permitted on any
-elevation, and with a minimum separation of
eight (8) feet between steps. A minimum of 24
inches of exposed brick or stone shall be
required, unless a lesser amount is approved
by, the Planning Department at time of plans
review due to unique design,circumstances.
iv. Exterior Facades: Acceptable siding materials
include brick, stone, masonry, vinyl - siding,
and approved horizontal lap siding. Horizontal
,lap siding may be manufactured from natural
wood or cement fiber board or may be premium
quality vinyl siding with a minimum wall
thickness of 0.042 inches. Plywood and metal
siding are not permitted.
d. Roof Materials: Roofing material shall be
dimensional architectural shingles or better with a
minimum 30 -year warranty.
e. Porches and Stoops
i. Front Porches: All. front entry stoops and
front porches shall be constructed with
continuous masonry foundation wall or on 12" x
12" masonry piers. Extended front porches
shall be a minimum of five (5) feet deep.
Space between piers under porches shall be
enclosed with framed lattice panels. Handrails
and railings shall be finished painted wood,
vinyl rails or metal rail systems with
vertical pickets or swan balusters. Pickets
shall be supported on top and bottom rails
that span between columns.
f. Garages.
i. All units shall have an attached garage. Front
loaded attached garages shall be permitted to
extend as far forward from the front line of
16-850
04/26/17
the main dwelling as the front line of the
front porch provided that the rooflines of the
porch and garage are contiguous. Where the
rooflines are not contiguous, garages shall be
permitted to project a maximum of four (4)
feet forward of the front line of the main
dwelling.
ii. Front loaded and corner side loaded garages
shall use an upgraded garage door. An upgraded
garage door is any door with a minimum of two
(2) enhanced features. Enhanced features shall
include windows, raised panels, decorative
panels, arches, hinge straps or other
architectural features on the exterior that
enhance the entry (i.e. decorative lintels,
shed roof overhangs, arches, columns,
keystones, eyebrows, etc.) Flat panel garage
doors are prohibited.
g. Heating, Ventilation and Air Conditioning (HVAC)
Units and Whole House Generators. Units shall
initially be screened from view of public roads by
landscaping or low maintenance material, as
approved by the Planning Department. (P)
Ayes: Jaeckle, Haley, Winslow, Holland and Elswick.
Nays: None.
17SN0769
In Bermuda Magisterial District, D.K. Walters Builder Inc.
requests amendment of zoning approval (Case 15SN0632) to
amend cash proffers and amendment of zoning district map in a
Residential (R-12) District on 1.1 acres located within the
Holly Haven Subdivision along Osborne Road. Density will be
controlled by zoning conditions or 'ordinance standards.' The
Comprehensive Plan suggests the property is appropriate for
residential use of 2.5 dwellings per acre or less. Tax IDs
794-657-7210 and 8115.
Mr. Turner presented a summary of Case 17SN0769 and stated
Planning staff and the Planning Commission recommended
approval and acceptance of the proffered condition. He
further stated Transportation staff recommended denial
because there are impacts on the road network specifically
attributable to the proposed development that have not been
addressed, including increased traffic volume and safety of
the roads.
Mr. Dan Walters accepted the recommendation. He stated he
believes the condition proffered is reasonable under state
law.
Ms. Jaeckle called for public comment.
There being no one to address the issue, the public hearing
was closed.
On motion of Ms. Jaeckle, seconded by Ms. Haley, the Board
approved Case 17SN0769 and accepted the following proffered
condition:
16-851
04/26/17
1. Architectural/Design Elements:
a. Driveways/Front Walks.
i. Front Walks: A minimum of a 42 -inch -wide
concrete front walk shall be provided to the
front entrance of each dwelling unit, to
connect to drives, sidewalks, or street.
b. Landscaping.
i. Front Yard Tree: One (1) tree per lot shall be
planted or retained. A tree shall be planted
or retained on both street frontages on corner
lots. The front yard tree shall be a large
deciduous tree and have a, minimum caliper of
2.5 inches. Native trees shall be permitted to
have a minimum caliper of 2 inches.
ii. Front Foundation Planting Beds: Foundation
planting is required along the entire front
facade of all units, and shall extend along
all sides facing a street. Foundation Planting
Beds shall be a minimum of four (4) feet wide
from the'unit foundation. Planting beds shall
be defined with a trenched edge or suitable
landscape edging material. Planting beds shall
include medium shrubs and may. include
spreading groundcovers. Unit corners shall be
visually softened with vertical accent shrubs
(4'-51) or small evergreen trees (6'-81) at
the time of planting.
C. Architecture and Materials.
i. Style and Form: The architectural styles shall
be interpretations of traditional Richmond
architecture, using forms and elements
compatible with those in the Holly Haven
subdivision such as Georgian, Adam, Classical
Revival Colonial, Greek Revival, Queen Anne,
and Craftsman Styles.
ii. Repetition: Dwellings with the same elevations
may not be located adjacent to, directly
across. from, or diagonally across from each
other on the same street. This requirement
does not apply to units on different streets
backing up to each other.
iii. Exterior Facades: Acceptable siding materials
include brick, stone, masonry, stucco,
synthetic stucco (E.I.F.S), vinyl siding, and
approved horizontal lap siding. Horizontal lap
siding may be manufactured from natural wood
or cement fiber board or may be premium
quality vinyl siding with a minimum wall
thickness of 0.042 inches. Plywood and metal
siding are not permitted.
d. Roof Materials. Roofing material shall be
dimensional architectural'shingles or better with a
minimum 30 -year warranty.
16-852
04/26/17
e. Porches and Stoops.
i. Front Porches: All front entry stoops and
front porches shall be constructed with
continuous masonry foundation wall or on 12" x
12" masonry piers. Extended front porches
shall be a minimum of four (4) feet deep.
Space between piers under porches shall be
enclosed with framed lattice panels. Handrails
and railings shall be finished painted wood,
vinyl_ rails or metal rail systems with
vertical pickets or swan balusters. Pickets
shall be supported on top and bottom rails
that span between columns.
f. Garages.
i. All units shall have an attached garage. Front
loaded attached garages shall be permitted to
extend as far forward from the front line of
the main dwelling as the front line of the
front porch provided that the rooflines of the
porch and garage are contiguous. Where the
rooflines are not contiguous, garages shall be
permitted to project a maximum of four (4)
feet forward of the front line of the main
dwelling.
ii. Front loaded and corner side loaded garages
shall use an upgraded garage door. An upgraded
garage door is any door with a minimum of two
(2) enhanced features. Enhanced features shall
include windows, raised panels, decorative
panels, arches, hinge straps or other
architectural features on the exterior that
enhance the entry (i.e. decorative lintels,
shed roof overhangs, arches; columns,
keystones, eyebrows, etc.) Flat panel garage
doors are prohibited.
g. Heating, Ventilation and Air Conditioning (HVAC)
Units and Whole House Generators. Units shall
initially be screened from view of public roads by
landscaping or low maintenance material, as
approved by the Planning Department. (P)
Ayes: Jaeckle, Haley, Winslow, Holland and Elswick.
Nays: None.
17SN0752
In Dale Magisterial District, Windermere Development Co LLC
requests amendment of zoning (Case 08SN0254) to amend cash
proffers and amendment of zoning district map in a
Residential (R-12) District on 5.6 acres fronting 575 feet on
the south line of Beulah Road, 300 feet west of Salem Church
Road. Density will be controlled by zoning conditions or
ordinance standards. The Comprehensive Plan suggests the
property is appropriate for Suburban Residential II use (2.0
to 4.0 dwellings per acre). Tax ID 777 -674 -Part of 4696.
16-853
04/26/17
,J
Mr. Turner presented a summary of Case 17SN0752 and stated
both staff and the Planning Commission recommended approval
and acceptance of the proffered condition.
Mr. Andy Scherzer, representing the applicant, accepted the
recommendation. He stated he believes the condition proffered
is reasonable under state law.
In response to Mr. Holland's question regarding the lack of
turn lanes into the proposed development, Mr. Smith stated
the proposed subdivision does not have access to a major
roadway.
Ms. Jaeckle called for public comment.
There being no one to address the issue, the public hearing
was closed.
On motion of Mr. Holland, seconded by Ms. Haley, the Board
approved Case 17SN0752 and accepted the following proffered
condition:
1. Architectural/Design Elements:
a. Driveways/Front Walks
i. Driveways: All portions of driveways and
parking areas shall. be brushed concrete,
stamped concrete, exposed aggregate concrete,
asphalt, or decorative pavers.
ii. Front Walks: A minimum of a three (3) foot
wide concrete front walk shall be provided to
the front entrance of each dwelling unit, to
connect to drives, sidewalks, or street.
b. Landscaping
i. Front Yard Tree: One (1) tree per lot shall be
planted or retained along both sides of all
streets. A tree shall be planted or,retained
on both street frontages on corner lots. The
tree shall be planted or retained along the
front property line within the. street side
half of the required front yard setback. The
front yard tree shall be a large deciduous
tree and have a minimum caliper of 2.5 inches.
Native trees shall be permitted to have a
minimum caliper of 2 inches.
ii. Front Foundation Planting Beds: Foundation
planting is required along the entire front
facade of all units. Foundation beds shall be.
a minimum of four (4) feet wide from the unit
foundation. Planting beds shall be defined
with a trenched edge or suitable landscape
edging material. Planting beds shall include
medium shrubs and may include spreading
groundcovers. A four (4) foot extension of
this bed and plantings shall be provided from
the end of the structure where a side step
down foundation is within fifteen (15) feet of
the front facade.
16-854
04/26/17
c.
Q
e
iii. Front Yards: Except for the foundation
planting bed, all front yards shall be sodded
and irrigated.
Architecture and Materials
i. Repetition: Dwellings with the same elevations
may not be located adjacent to, directly
across from, or diagonally across from each
other on the same street. This 'requirement
does not apply to units on different streets
backing up to each other.
ii. Step-down Siding: Stepping- the siding down
below the first floor shall only be permitted
in circumstances of unique topographical
conditions. Step downs shall be permitted on
the side and rear elevations only, with a
maximum of two (2) steps permitted on any
elevation, and with a minimum separation of
eight (8) feet between steps. A minimum of 24
inches of exposed brick or stone shall be
required, unless a lesser amount is approved
by the Planning Department due to unique
design circumstances.
iii. Exterior Facades: Acceptable siding materials
include brick, stone, masonry, stucco,
synthetic stucco (E.I.F.S), vinyl siding, and
approved horizontal lap siding. Horizontal lap
siding may be manufactured from natural wood
or cement fiber board ..or may be premium
quality vinyl siding. Plywood and metal siding
are not permitted. Additional siding
requirements:
1. Where a dwelling borders more than one
street, all street -facing facades shall
be finished in the same materials.
2. All vinyl siding shall have a minimum
wall thickness of 0.042".
3. Synthetic Stucco siding shall be finished
in smooth, sand or level texture. Rough
textures are not permitted.
Roof Materials: Roofing material shall be
dimensional architectural shingles or better with a
minimum 30 -year warranty.
Porches. Stoops, and Decks
i. Front Porches: All front entry stoops and
front porches shall be constructed with
continuous masonry foundation wall or on 12".x
12" masonry piers. Extended front porches
shall be a minimum of four (4) feet deep.
Space between piers under porches shall be
enclosed with framed lattice panels. Handrails
and railings shall be finished painted wood,
vinyl rails or metal rail systems with
vertical pickets or swan balusters. Pickets
16-855
04/26/17
shall be supported on top and bottom rails
that span between columns.
f. Heating, Ventilation and Air Conditioning (HVAC)
Units and Whole House Generators. Units shall
initially be screened from view of public roads by
landscaping or low maintenance material, as may be
approved by the Planning Department. (P)
2. Sidewalk. A five (5) foot wide concrete sidewalk shall
be provided along Beulah Road for the entire property
frontage. The sidewalk shall be designed and constructed
to VDOT standards. The sidewalk shall be constructed
subsequent to the Beulah Elementary School road
improvements. The sidewalk shall be constructed or
bonded before the issuance of the final certificate of
occupancy, or within six (6) months after the Beulah
Elementary School road improvements are complete,
whichever occurs first. (P)
Ayes: Jaeckle, Haley, Winslow, Holland and Elswick.
Nays: None.
16. PUBLIC HEARINGS
16.A. TO CONSIDER AN ORDINANCE TO VACATE AN EXISTING EIGHT -
FOOT EASEMENT ACROSS LOTS 1-17, WYNWOOD AT FOXCREEK,
.S'RrTTn?J 2
Mr. Dean Sasek stated this date and time has been advertised
for the Board to consider an ordinance to vacate an existing
eight -foot easement across Lots 1-17, Wynwood at Foxcreek,
Section 2.
Ms. Jaeckle called for public comment.
There being no one to address the issue, the public hearing
was closed. -
On motion of Mr. Elswick, seconded by Ms. Haley, the Board
adopted the following ordinance:
AN ORDINANCE whereby the COUNTY OF
CHESTERFIELD, VIRGINIA, ("GRANTOR")
vacates to RREF II -TFC, WYNWOOD, LLC,
("GRANTEE"), an 8' easement across Lots
1-17, Wynwood at Foxcreek, Section 2,
MATOACA Magisterial District,
Chesterfield County, Virginia, as shown
on a plat thereof duly recorded in -the
Clerk's Office, Circuit Court,
Chesterfield County, Virginia in Plat
Book 226, at Page 100.
WHEREAS, RREF II -TFC, WYNWOOD, LLC, petitioned the Board
of Supervisors of Chesterfield County, Virginia to vacate an
8' easement across Lots 1-17, Wynwood at Foxcreek, Section 2,
MATOACA Magisterial District, Chesterfield County, Virginia
more particularly shown on a plat of record in the Clerk's
Office of the Circuit Court of said County in Plat Book 226,
Page 100, by KOONTZ-BRYANT, P.C., dated JULY 15, 2014,
recorded OCTOBER 16, 2014. The easement petitioned to be
vacated is more fully described as follows:
16-856
04/26/17
AN 8' easement, across Lots, 1-17,
Wynwood at Foxcreek, Section 2, the
location of which is more fully shown on
a plat made by KOONTZ-BRYANT, P.C., dated
MARCH 22, 2017, a copy of which is
attached hereto and made a part of this
Ordinance.
WHEREAS, notice has been given pursuant to Section 15.2-
2204 of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended, by
advertising; and,
WHEREAS, no public necessity exists for the continuance
of the easement sought to be vacated.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF
SUPERVISORS OF CHESTERFIELD COUNTY, VIRGINIA:
That pursuant to Section 15.2-2272 of the Code of
Virginia, 1950, as amended, the -aforesaid easement be and is
hereby vacated.
This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect in
accordance with Section 15.2-2272 of the Code of Virginia,
1950, as amended, and a certified copy of this Ordinance,
together with the plat attached hereto shall be recorded no
sooner than thirty days hereafter in the Clerk's Office,
Circuit Court, Chesterfield County, Virginia pursuant to
Section 15.2-2276 of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended.
The effect of this Ordinance pursuant to Section 15.2-
2274 is to destroy the force and effect of the recording of
the portion of the plat vacated. This Ordinance shall vest
fee simple title to the easement hereby vacated in the
property owner of Lots 1-17, Wynwood at Foxcreek, Section 2
free and clear of any rights of public use.
Accordingly, this Ordinance shall be indexed in the
names of the GRANTOR and GRANTEE, or their successors in
title.
Ayes: Jaeckle, Haley, Winslow, Holland and Elswick.
Nays: None.
16.B. TO CONSIDER AN ORDINANCE TO VACATE AND CONVEYANCE OF A
PORTION OF A SEVENTY-FOOT UNIMPROVED COUNTY RIGHT OF
WAY DEDICATED WITH WINTERFIELD STATION SUBDIVISION,
SECTION 1
Mr. Sasek stated this date and time has been advertised for
the Board to consider an ordinance to vacate and conveyance
of a portion of a seventy-foot unimproved county right of way
dedicated with Winterfield Station Subdivision, Section 1.
Ms. Jaeckle called for public comment.
There being no one to address the issue, the public hearing
was closed.
On motion of Mr. Elswick, seconded by Mr. Winslow, the Board
adopted the following ordinance and authorized the Chairman
of the Board of Supervisors and County Administrator to
execute a quitclaim deed to convey a portion of the right of
way:
16-857
04/26/17
AN ORDINANCE whereby the COUNTY OF
CHESTERFIELD, VIRGINIA, ("GRANTOR")
vacates to CECILE M. FUMAGALI-MURON, DREW
WATSON and JENNIFER PEYTON NEUVILLE AKA
JENNIFER WATSON, PETER T. UEBERROTH and
SHELLY ANNE UEBERROTH, husband and wife,
REBKEE PARTNERS WINTERFIELD, LLC, -and
COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD, VIRGINIA,
("GRANTEES"), a 701. unimproved county
right of way within Winterfield Station,
Section 1, MIDLOTHIAN Magisterial
District, Chesterfield County, Virginia,
as shown on a plat thereof duly recorded
in the Clerk's Office, Circuit Court,
Chesterfield County, Virginia in Plat
Book 150, at Page 25.
WHEREAS, REBKEE PARTNERS WINTERFIELD, LLC, petitioned
the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County, Virginia to
vacate a 70' unimproved county right of way within
Winterfield Station, Section 1, MIDLOTHIAN Magisterial
District, Chesterfield County, Virginia, more particularly
shown on a plat of record in the Clerk's Office of the
Circuit' Court of said County in Plat Book 150, Page 25, by
JORDAN CONSULTING ENGINEERS, P.C., dated AUGUST 16, 2004.
The right of way petitioned to be vacated is more fully
described as follows:
A 70' unimproved ,county right of way
within Winterfield Station, Section 1,
the location of which is more fully shown
on a_ plat made by BALZER & ASSOCIATES,
INC., dated JANUARY 27, 2017, and revised
APRIL 5, 2017, a copy of which is
attached hereto and made a part of this
Ordinance.
WHEREAS, notice has been given pursuant to Section 15.2-
2204 of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended, by
advertising; and,
WHEREAS, no public necessity exists for the continuance
of the right of way sought to be vacated.
NOW THEREFORE., BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF
SUPERVISORS OF -CHESTERFIELD COUNTY, VIRGINIA:
That pursuant to Section 15.2-2272 of the Code of
Virginia, 1950, as amended, the aforesaid right of way be and
is hereby vacated. GRANTEES hereby convey unto the GRANTOR
and GRANTOR hereby reserves a variable width water and
drainage easement and variable width water easement within
the right of way vacated, as shown on the attached plat.
This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect in
accordance with Section 15.2-2272 of the Code of Virginia,
1950, as amended, and a certified copy of this Ordinance,
together with the plat attached hereto shall be recorded no
sooner than thirty days hereafter in the Clerk's Office,
Circuit Court, Chesterfield County, Virginia pursuant to
Section 15.2-2276 of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended.
16-858
04/26/17
The effect of this Ordinance pursuant to Sec -tion 15.2-
2274 is to destroy the force and effect of the recording of
the portion of the plat vacated. This Ordinance shall vest
fee simple title to the centerline of the right of way hereby
vacated in the adjacent property owners free and clear of any
rights of public use.
Accordingly, this Ordinance shall be indexed in the
names of the GRANTOR and GRANTEES, or their successors in
title.
Ayes: Jaeckle, Haley, Winslow, Holland and Elswick.
Nays: None.
17. REMAINING MANUFACTURED HOME PERMITS AND ZONING REQUESTS
There were no remaining manufactured home permits or zoning
requests'at this time.
18. FIFTEEN -MINUTE CITIZEN COMMENT PERIOD. ON UNSCHEDULED
MATTERS
Mr. Todd Knode addressed the Board relative to what it means
to be a leader.
19. ADJOURNMENT
On motion of Ms. Haley, seconded by Mr. Holland, the Board
adjourned at 9:59 p.m. to May 24, 2017 at 3 p.m. for a work
session in Room 502 at the.County Administration Building.
Ayes: Jaeckle, Haley, Winslow, Holland and Elswick.
Nays: None.
06seph P. Casey
County Administra
S170/40
Dorot y A. aeckle
Chairman
16-859
04/26/17