The URL can be used to link to this page

03-15-2000 PacketCHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Meeting! Date: March 15, 2000 Item Number: 2. Subject: County Adm~nlstrators Comments - Gubernatorial Appointment of County Staff County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Summary of Information: Allan M. Carmody, Budget Manager in the Department of Budget and Management, has been appointed by Goverm~r e~u mQr~o serve on the Comm nwealth/s Desiqn-Build Construct~o~ M=~oement Review Board. Primary responsibilities i~ciude''making determination~"'o~' publi'~ - bodies' requests for procurement of construction. He will be one of four public body appointees to a nine-member Review Board. Mr. Carmody ~-'S~v~ ~0~r-~ear %erm having previously fulfilled an unexpired term under the Allen Administration. Preparer: ~.-~,~ "~"[ ~ ~' [ d~'~'~ Rebecca T. Dickson Title: Director, Bud,qet & Management Attachments: ~-~ Yes No AI A CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Meeting Date: March 15, 2000 Item Number: 5 .A. Subject: Resolutions Recognizing Mr. Daniel Gecker and Mr. Lloyd Lenhart for Their Service on the Committee on the Future County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Adoption of attached resolutions Summary of Information: qr. Daniel Gecker representing the Midlothian District and Mr. Lloyd Lenhart representing the Matoaca District have resigned from the Committee on the Future following years of active and dedicated service. Preparer: 0~[ ~(~~le Assistant County Administrator ~ri~n E. Cole At tacb-~ents: RECOGNIZING MR. DANIEL A. GECKER FOR HIS SERVICE ON THE COMMITTEE ON THE FUTURE WHEREAS, the Chesterfield County Committee on the Future was established in 1987 by the Board of Supervisors and the County Charter for the purpose of assessing the future and long range challenges which the County will face, advising the Board of Supervisors, and making recommendations to lessen any adverse effect on the County of future changes; and WHEREAS, Mr. Daniel A. Gecker was appointed as a member of the Committee in 1996 and served as Vice Chairman of the Committee from June 1998 through December 1999, and WHEREAS, Mr. Gecker has served the citizens of the Midlothian District with distinction for the past four years; and WHEREAS, Mr. Gecker conducted numerous Committee meetings and public forums and was instrumental in the creation of the Committee's "Youth Development" report; and WHEREAS, the Committee prepared the "Youth Development" report which creates recommendations to maximize the opportunity for Chesterfield County youth to become engaged contributors within their communities through community, church, and private organizations, voluntarism and school involvement; and WHEREAS, Mr. Gecker has dedicated countless hours to the Committee during the past four years. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors publicly recognizes Mr. Daniel A. Gecker and expresses appreciation for his dedication and outstanding service to the Committee on the Future and to the citizens of Chesterfield County. AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that a copy of this resolution be presented to Mr. Gecker and that this resolution be permanently recorded among the papers of this Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County, Virginia. . 03 RECOGNIZING HR. LLOYD A. LENHART FOR HIS SERVICE ON THE COMMITTEE ON THE FUTURE WHEREAS, the Chesterfield County Committee on the Future was established in 1987 by the Board of Supervisors and the County Charter for the purpose of assessing the future and long range challenges which the County will face, advising the Board of Supervisors, and making recommendations to lessen any adverse effect on the County of future changes; and WHEREAS, Mr. Lloyd A. Lenhart was appointed as a member of the Committee in 1998 and has served the citizens of the Matoaca District with distinction for the past two years; and WHEREAS, during Mr. Lenhart's tenure on the Committee, the Committee prepared the "Youth Development" report which creates recommendations to maximize the opportunity for Chesterfield County youth to become engaged contributors within their communities through community, church, and private organizations, voluntarism and school involvement; and WHEREAS, Mr. Lenhart has dedicated countless hours to the Committee during the past two years, including conducting numerous public forums. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors publicly recognizes Mr. Lloyd A. Lenhart and expresses appreciation for his dedication and outstanding service to the Committee on the Future and to the citizens of Chesterfield County. AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that a copy of this resolution be presented to Mr. Lenhart and that this resolution be permanently recorded among the papers of this Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County, Virginia. Meeting Date: March 15t 2000 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Item Number: 5.B. Page I of I Subject: Resolution Recognizing Pohlig Brothers, Inc. for~heir Contribution to Chesterfield County by Naming Them the Chesterfield County Medium Business of the Year for 2000 ,q .~.. County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Adoption of the attached resolution. Summary of Information: Based upon the Board's approved Business Appreciation Award criteria, the Board gives four awards annually, one each to Large, Medium and Small Business, and one to the Developer of the year. The committee submits Pohlig Brothers, Inc. located at 800t Greenpine Road for your approval as the recipient of Chesterfield's 2000 Medium Business Appreciation Award. Pohlig Brothers, Inc. has demonstrated its dedication and commitment as medium business of the year to the community of Chesterfield. Agi2000 Marl5/tls Preparer: ~/James G. Dunn / Title: Director Attachments: Yes ~-]No # ,)05 RECOGNIZING POHLIG BROTHERS, INCORPORATED AS THE 2000 MEDIUM BUSINESS OF THE YEAR WHEREAS, the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors established a Business Appreciation and Recognition Award to recognize existing businesses within the County that contribute to the County's economy and its citizens; and WHEREAS, Pohlig Brothers, Incorporated, a box-making company located at 8001 Greenpine Road in the Chesterfield County Industrial Park, has invested $4.3 million in the construction of a 110,000 square foot production facility on 9.3 acres of land; and WHEREAS, Pohlig Brothers, Incorporated employs 70 people, has been in Richmond for nearly 134 years, and moved to Chesterfield County in April 1996; and WHEREAS, Pohlig Brothers, Incorporated makes custom designed rigid and folding paperboard boxes and other paper products and also manufactures acid free boxes sold to the photography, art and museum markets across the country and exported to Japan and other foreign markets; and WHEREAS, the management of Pohlig Brothers, Incorporated believes that the most valuable resource is its loyal, competent and trained people, and the company continues to improve the quality of its products and services to its customers; and WHEREAS, Pohlig Brothers, Incorporated is involved in many civic activities including the United Way Campaign, the Richmond Private Industry Council and the Goodwill Industry Board, the Maymont Foundation, Greater Richmond Partnership, Greater Richmond Chamber of Commerce, Chesterfield Business Council, Leadership Metro. Richmond, the Rotary Club, Richmond Symphony, and the Richmond Museum of Fine Arts. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors publicly recognizes Pohlig Brothers, Incorporated and expresses its appreciation, on behalf of the County, for their many contributions by recognizing them as the 2000 Medium Business recipient of the Chesterfield County Business Appreciation and Recognition Award. AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that a copy of this resolution be presented to Pohlig Brothers, Incorporated and that this resolution be permanently recorded among the papers of this Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County, Virginia. CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page I of 1 Meetin~q Date: March 15, 2000 Item Number: Subject: Work Session on County Administrator's FY2001 Proposed Budget County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Hold a work session on the County Administrator's FY200t Proposed Budget Summaw of Information: This time has been set to continue work sessions on the County Administrator's FY2001 Proposed Budget. This work session is the second of three work sessions during which staff will present proposed expenditures for FY2001. On February 9th staff presented projected revenues for FY2001. On February 23rd, the School Board, Police Department and Community Development Division made presentations to the Board. On this date, the total FY2001 proposed budget will be presented along with the Human Services Division and the Community Development Block Grant Program. Detailed information on the Fire Department, Management Services Division and other County departments will be presented on March 22. Preparer: Rebecca T. Dickson Title: Director, Budget and Mana,qement Attachments: Yes ~-~No I# , ~071 mmmm 0 0 0 0 0 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I C~SO I I I I I I ~ I I I I lille OUTLINE OF CDBG RFP SUBMISSIONS FOR FY2000-2001 Code Enforcement/Business Revitalization I. Project: Proposer: Description: JeffDavis Corridor Proactive Code Enforcement Specialist - 3rd Year of Funding $48,850 Chesterfield County Planning Department Full-time inspector hired within the Chesterfield County Planning Dept. Inspector is to identify, coordinate & help resolve property maintenance violations within the Jefferson Davis Corridor and the Village of Ettrick; Inspector works w/neighborhoods & business organizations & sets priorities for pro-active code enforcement. Works w/IDA. Note: The Planning Department applied for funding for a second property maintenance inspector to work within the targeted areas. The amount requested for initial funding of this position is $43,287. This position was not recommended to be funded. 2. Project' Proposer: Description: Chesterfield County Workforce Development $50,000 Fresh Start Job Development & Training Program Program is designed to provide employment testing, counseling and job placement services to low/moderate income Chesterfield County residents. Office to be located at Park Lee Apartment Complex and open during the hours of 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. Intake & Assessment will be held on Tuesdays & Thursdays. 90 day follow-up & retention of job; 3. Project: Proposer: Description: Business Revitalization Coordinator $62,300 CDBG Department - Beverley Coleman Full-time Coordinator provides technical assistance to business owners/occupants located within the Urban Enterprise Zone along the Jefferson Davis Corridor and Village of Ettrick. Serves as a liason between the JDA and the CDBG Department. Provides assistance to several neighborhood & business organizations as well as County staff. 4. Project: Proposer: Description: Business Development Opportunities $50,000 Virginia Community Development Loan Fund(VCDLF) - Timothy Hayes, Exec. Director VCDLF is a Virginia Corporation formed in March of 1995. Its mission "Creating alternative models of financing that facilitates community economic development." Since its inception the mission has been achieved primarily through its micro loan program. This program provides Fin- ancing, training and technical assistance to those individuals that lack access to traditional capital, desiring to start new business or expand an existing business. Emphasis is placed on the creation & expansion of small and minority owned businesses. 5. Project: Proposer: Description · Demolition Project - $60,000 Chesterfield County Building Inspections Department - William Dupler, Building Official Demolition and removal of a vacant church building located at the intersection of Chesterfield Avenue and Light Street in the Village of Ettrick. The building is a nuisance and has become a breeding ground for loitering as well as posses an imminent threat to the community. Public Facilities/Improvements Project' Proposer: Description: Purchase of an Ambulance - $101,479 Bensley/Bermuda Volunteer Rescue Squad Funds will be used for the purchase of an ambulance to replace Ambulance 525 for Bensley- Bermuda Rescue Squad. The replacement is part of a strategic plan developed for a schedule of upgrades & replacements for the fleet of ambulances used by the rescue squad. The ambulance is a Type III modular ambulance currently mounted on a Ford E350 chassis. In addition, the unit will be equipped for Advanced Life Support level & used for Basic Life Support incidents. 7. Project: Proposer: Description: Purchase of a Ladder Truck for Bensley Fire Station - $150,000 Chesterfield County Fire Department Funds will be used for the purchase of a standard fu'e department ladder truck for the Bensley Station located at 2836 Dundas Road. This request is for partial funding only. $540,000 will be allocated through the General Fund. 8. Project: Proposer' Description ' Camp Baker ADA Facility Conversion (Multi-Phased Public Imprvt's) $150,000 Richmond Area Association for Retarded Citizens This is a 2nd year request for a multi-phased public facility improvement at Camp Baker, a rustic facility owned by Chesterfield County and leased by the county to the Richmond Area ARC to operate programs for persons with severe disabilities that allow short-term respite for caregivers. The improvements are in accordance to a 10 year Master Plan. Project involves the continuation of on-going construction of a multi-phased project that includes a new dormitory style building at Camp Baker and renovations of several cabins. Project: Proposer: Description: Purchase of 21 Hand-Held Capnographs for CDBG eligible Fire Stations $55,000 Chesterfield County Fire Department Capnograph units will be placed on ambulances & first response vehicles located in CDBG eligible areas. The capnographs will allow skilled volunteers/career paramedics to enhance advanced life support care for residents in the Bensley& Ettrick Communities. Use of these devices will enable the rescue squad to provide critical patient care monitoring during advanced airway procedures. 10. Project: Proposer: Description: Crescent Park Sewer Line Extentiort/Installation-Final Funding $163,000 Chesterfield County Public Utilities Dept. / CDBG Department The project entails the installation ora public sewer line to serve approximately 22 households within the Crescent Park neighborhood. Those households who meet the low/moderate income criteria as defined by HUD will be allowed a grant for the lateral/connection cost. Those who fail to meet the income guidelines will be billed over a period of approximately 36 months the costs associated with the connection fees. Approximate costs will be $1,465.00 plus plumbers fees. 11. Project: Proposer: Description: Ettrick Park Basketball Courts $57,000 Chesterfield County Parks & Recreation Funds would be utilized to provide for the construction/installation of portable basketball courts at the Ettrick Park site. 12. Project: Purchase of Mobile Data Computers in CDBG eligible Communities $100,000 Proposer: Chesterfield County Fire Department Description: The first phase of a project to outfit all emergency medical and fh'e vehicles with this equipment. Devices will be linked to all hospitals which the county delivers patients. It will enable emergency providers to have direct access w/the emergency room staffconcerning patient care. The equipment allows for emergency medical providers to collect important medical information that may be faxed directly to the physician in the receiving Emergency Room. Partial funding is requested for this project. The total project cost is $750,000. Additional funds will be raised through Private & Corporate Foundations. 13. Project: Proposer: Description · Cogbill Road Sidewalk Improvements - $93,800 (Presently ineligible) Meadowdale Area Community Council Request is for match funding for the installation of lighting, sidewalks, curbs & gutters within the Dale Magisterial District along Cogbill Road, south of Chippingham Pkwy, west of Hopkins Road, north of the Meadowdale Library. This project is listed on the Chesterfield County Proposed FY01 Enhancement Projects schedule. 14. Project' Proposer · Description 15. Project: Proposer: Description 16. Project' Proposer- Description: Matoaca Elementary School Playground Improvements $31,000 Matoaca Elementary PTA : Purchase & installation of playground equipment for Matoaca Elementary School. The playground apparatus and equipment will serve children in the kindergarden thru fifth grade As well as the residents of the Matoaca community. $2,000 of District Improvement Funds has been granted for this project. Currently, there is no playground apparatus/equipment at the school previous equipment had been condemned and removed by the County's School Board. Jefferson Davis Police Precinct - 2nd Year Lease Escalation $98,880 Chesterfield County Police Department The Police Dept. proposes to lease an approximately 4,000 square foot single story office building Lease will be for 10 years with rent payable on a monthly basis. Building will be built to the spec- ification of the police department. $ 96,000 figure is based on an annual lease payment of $24 per square foot, approx. 4,000 sq. ft. building. Monthly lease payment ors 8,000 is projected. A definitive site has been chosen along Route 10 in Chester, however no conslruction to date has taken place. Winchester Greens Single-Family Housing Development/Infrastructure Improvt's. - $200,000 Better Housing Coalition - Robert Newman, Operations Director Funds are being requested for the installation of curbs and gutters within the proposed single- family development section of the Winchester Greens (formerly Park Lee) housing complex. 17. Project: Association Hispanic - Americana de Richmond (AHAR Locale) $93,070 Proposer: Josie Guzman, Cultural Coordinator Description: Acquisition & renovation ora building to accomodate office space, dance classes, classroom conversions. Public Services 18. Project: Proposer: Description: Community Corrections Vocational Specialist $49,472 Tara Kunkel, Criminal Justice Planner Activity would be used to fund a vocational specialist position to work with chronically unemployed adult offenders throughout the County that have been placed under the sup- ervision of the Chesterfield County Corrections Services by the courts. 19. Project: Proposer' Description: Spay/Neuter Assistance for Pets of Low/Moderate Income Households $20,000 PetFix Coalition, Jane Lanham - Representative Provide outreach and reduced cost for pet sterilization in CDBG eligible neighborhoods w/ the aim of reducing public health and safety risks. 20. Project' Proposer: Description- Association Hispanic - Americana de Richmond (AHAR Locale) $16,370 Josie Guzman, Cultural Coordinator Administration of a variety of programs to the hispanic community. 21. Project: Proposer: Description: Multi-purpose Building & Learning Center Tutorial Program $44,216 The Children's Home of Virginia Baptist, Inc. - Janice M. Mack, Director Implementation of programs to provide continual educational/tutorial services to participants. The main focus of the multi-purpose building and learning center will be to provide problematic outreach services to the community at large. 22. Project: Ampthill Senior Adult Program $6,000 Proposer' Chesterfield County Parks & Recreation Description: Senior adult program which offers recreational opportunities once a week to participants. Activities include aerobics, instructional classes, arts and crafts, board games & quests speakers. 23. Project: Proposer' Description: 24. Project: Proposer' Description 25. Project: Proposer: Description: Bensley Community Center Operations $50,000 Chesterfield County Parks & Recreation Funds will be used to provide staff & programs directed to seniors & youth. Activities include aerobics, instructional classes, arts and crafts, board games & guests speakers. Bensley Community Center Furnishings $15,000 Chesterfield County Parks & Recreation : Purchase of furnishings & equipment for the new section of the Bensley Community Center. Center will be able to accommodate programs for both seniors and youth in the community. CARES Homelessness Prevention, Transitional Assistance and Shelter Services Programs $15,000 Crisis Assistance Response Emergency Shelter, Inc. - Holvar E. Olson, Exec. Director Program provides Chesterfield County residents with 24 hour, year round emergency shelter services to those victims of domestic violence and the homeless. 26. Project: Proposer: Description · CARITAS Emergency Shelter Program $35,000 CARITAS - Lee Blons, Executive Director Provides Chesterfield Countys homeless residents with emergency shelter during the winter months from October thru March. Services are provided through a variety of member church congregations. 27. Project: Proposer: Description · Connecting Families & Youth At Risk with Community Resources $25,000 Chesterfield County Communities In Schools - Martha J. Frickert, CIS Administrator Provide direct services to students and their families to enhance the potential for students at Bellwood & Chalkley Elementary Schools to experience academic and personal success. Provides comprehensive community-based interventions for at-risk students & their families before the problems occur. 28. Project: Proposer · Description: 29. Project: Proposer: Description: Ettrick Community Building (Operations) $85,000 Chesterfield County Parks & Recreation Programs and recreational opportunities provided 5 days per week for seniors, youth, teens & adults. Activities include aerobics, instructional classes, arts & crafts, board games, guest speakers. Funds are used to pay for part-time salaries, supplies/materials, postage, etc... Regional Community Leadership Development $10,000 Friends Association for Children - John C. Pumell, Exec. Director Program assists residents who live in Chesterfield County public housing communities to acquire the interpersonal and community organization skills needed to organize and promote citizenship programs in their communities. 30. Project: Proposer: Description · Richmond Community Action Program - Chester Shepherd & Outreach Center $10,000 Richmond Community Action Program - Robert Wyune, Exec. Director Program offers a variety of educational and service programs for senior citizens who live in the Chester area. The program is proposed to operate fromthe Chester Presbyterian Church. Seniors would be recruited from low income neighborhoods including trailer parks located along the Jefferson Davis Highway corridor, and Bermuda Run Apartments etc... The purpose of the program is to enrich the lives of older persons and enable them to continue to live independent, meaningful lives. 31. Project: Proposer: Description: 32. Project: Proposer: Description: 33. Project: Proposer: Description: 34. Project: Proposer: Description: 35. Project: Proposer: Description: 36. Project: Proposer: Description: H.O.M.E. - Counseling Services $13,276 Housing Opportunities Made Equal - Constance Chamberlain, Exec. Director Program designed to provide homeownership education, f'mancial counseling, and the home buying process including credit seminars and the loan application process. Marguerite Christian Youth Association - Equipment $7,600 Marguerite Christian Youth Association - Cheryl Engelking, Secretary Purchase of athletic equipment. Bensley Elementary School Tutorial Program $12,000 Bensley Elementary School - Mildred Bell, Principal Provide structured tutorial services for 1 st and 2nd graders on site at Bensley. Instruction will be provided by certified teachers whom work at the school. Transportation services will be provided to the students who participate. Winchester Greens Learning/Resource Center $12,000 Chesterfield Public Library - Sherle Orton Provide residents who live along Jeff Davis Highway and within the Park Lee (Winchester Green) Apartment Complex with access to the library services, materials and technology. The program will be physically housed in a space provided by management of Park Lee. On-line computer & interact access will be made available to the residents. Youth Programs $40,000 Chesterfield County Parks & Recreation Provides a variety of summer and winter youth recreation programs at various sites. Ettrick, Chalkley, Harrowgate, Park Lee and Bellwood. Programs serve children ages 6 - 17. Teen Violence Intervention Project - $ 30,000 (Currently ineligible) Janett Forte, Coordinator, Chesterfield County Domestic Violence Resource Center The Chesterfield County Domestic Violence Resource Center and Theatre IV proposes to implement a model adolescent violence prevention program in the County schools. The play will be presented to all middle and high school audiences, in addition 10 outside performances for parent and citizen audiences will be held. Planning & Administration 37. Project: Proposer: Description: Feasibility Study - $15,000 Jefferson Davis Association - Beverley Coleman, Business Revitalization Coordinator Study to determine the design, composition and location of a business incubator. A $10,000 grant bom the State of Virginia has been received by JDA. The study will be prepared by the Economic Development Staff at Virginia Tech. A:\RAMSEY00.WPD CDBG FY 00-0i' PROJECT FUNDING REQUEST ' ,u, ,,, ~,-.mc homcbuycrs Housing counsciing and dowq~paymcnt asastancc ,x~ ;:~ ,: . Proposer- Housing OpponurJtics Made Equal Description- The HO~,~/Keystone 7~-_ ,~ a ~..;~ p,o~am ~u, dr~,-,..e homebuyers ~s a program mat increases home ownership among iow and moderae income families who would othci~Ssc not bc ~ic to purchase a homc. Traincd counsciors prcp~c thcsc mmmcs for long term homcowncrship. -* ~ ~ ~ ~ ~:~* (i5) new appiicants wkh downpaymenffclosing cost assistance. ~mounr requested, $50.700. Acquisition ana a,,~-,,,, v c,,~pm~,,, assistancc ?roposcr- Ricinnond Habitat t-or iqumanit¥, inc. Description- P~chmond Habitat For Humanity is seeking monies in order to fund acquisition ~,~ s~te deveiopmem cost related to the construaion of single family houses for purcimsc by approvcd iow and modcratc incomc ihmiiics. Thcsc imuscs arc to be bulk upon property currently owned by Habitat and located on Me~ewood Rd.. in the coumv"s Bermuda district, imemions are to build (27) homes by the end of ~c,a~ ~...~ ~'. m_. ' ' ~ ~ ,.~m is rcquircd during ~vvo. o~, mn~,.g to suppo~ thc acvciopmcnt ct seven ~;' ~' u~ ~gg-~ugi dS~al year. ~ount rcqucstca is ~/g,ugg. ~_L,_~_'.,o no__u_'~ng Rehab inspector Proposer-_ c~._~..a,_.,,,.~,,.,.c,a ~ County Block Grant Dcpanmcnt Dcscription- Thc Housing Rchab inspcctor position is of dire nccd ibr purposcs of rcducing thc amount of applicants that are currently on the existing waiting list for rehab services. The Housing inspector position will be a contracted position and wilt be paid on a pcr-housc basis. Thc Housing ~' _ _ mspccmr wm conauct nouang inspcctions and pcribnn work -,,-ritc-ups and cost cstimations of cach homc qualified ilar assistance. The Housing ~ ....... ~'- -'- ... a....~ ' " project ...... x.xa~,~,~,,~r YVlli c~nuu~,, penomc inspections .... O~liU a kUlli[Jlk i, iun inspection once the rehab services nave ueen ~ ~ ~' ' ' - ~'' - aaa _ ' ' cu.,p,e[ea. ~mount requested. $~ 4. 203-K Pro,-mn Proposer- Chesteffieid ~ · ..... ~'= _ ,~o~..,y ~.oc~ Grant Department Description- t ne z~.~-rc ~'rogram is designed to allow tot the purcnase ant; r,.no, ofmodcratc priccd housing. Applicants must bc quaiificd as iow to modcratc income families. This program is '-' ,~a ..... :~. ,q a-, .~. a: ..... '~. intCnu~u tu a~ol~t l 1 ~'/lam,,,~o .,lin uov,.pay m,~nt and closing cost assistance to purchase homes in Chesterfield County. 'Amount requested IS ~DU~UUU. Emcrgcncy Homc Rcpair Prograin Proposer- Cheste~Seid County Block Grant Departmem Descriotion- I ne ~mergenc¥ Home Repair ~' . _ I ll~J~l~,lll iS UU~I[II~;;O tOspecltlCally,,~,,,:-' ,,,,~ ..... and modcratc income famiiics with rcpaking thosc houshng cicmcnts which may provc to bc iifc thrcatcning to thc hcaith and safety, of thc occupants if'ic~ ',,,,,.lo,,, c,~.:~ a By providing such repairs, living conditions will be improved as well as elimination of substandard housing. 'Amount,,q,,~,~, ............ 6. Home 0wncrship Proposer- imeI~'~tith Housing Corporation =..5~:_,:A inteffakh Housing Co~oration will acquire, construct and sell (i0) properties to ,~,s ,,1~ au/o o, ,nw aca mcalan lllCOmc. first amc homcbuycrs with incomcs ~" ~t ~:=., r,' ~ " · mc wm scr~c as acvmopcr of thc work on thc propcmcs and will Dc bring houses up to Housing Quality St~dards. ~=:~ prEiect is to be administered counK~wvidc. This program will providc pro,'mn incomc to thc county. ~mount rcqucstcd ,~o,uu~ of HON~ ~nds. /. mousing KenaDillta[ion Prog~ram Proposcr- EidcrHomcs Corporation Description- rmacrriomcs ......... Corporation wm providc housing rcnau scrviccs to county~ rcsidcnts, which-' ':~ improve the v., , -,:~. ~ ~,,, d v aml,~y, structure ana value of the nome. k is intended that me nous{,g repairs wni result m long-term oencllts to tho including improved appcmmncc, stabihzation of home valuca, and retention of owner occupied swacmrca. This program is to bc adminiatcrcd counts"Mdc. Thc Comprchcnsivc ........ ~ome Ke¢mr Pro,am Wlli permit the expenmture of up to HUD Housing ~uanty 3tana~as. ~sist~ce Will be provide in r.e torm ot tor~veawe loans, inrcrcst-bcaring loans and a combination of forgivcabic ~d intcrcst bering loans. ~i loans will be sccurcd by a Dccd of Trust on thc propc~'. ~nount rcqucstcd is o~UU,UUU. t-lousing Rchabiiita[ioI~'~olnc Ow,-ncrship ~,~,,,~ ,.,omm,~,,[y tJe,eloD-ent and Housing Corporation Proposer- =-' '~- ~ .... :~.~ r, .. ,. - Description- Ettrick Community Development and Housing Co~oration is entering a partnership with .... --:- ~* ' -?: ..... :'' ..... v Irgh,,~ a,atc Om,,.~ =ay ;o purchasc, acmonsn or rchabiiitatc and market a total of cight (8) housing units. Thcsc propcr~ics arc adjaccm to thc school's campus. Thcy will provide home ownership counseling for iow and moderate income residems to enable them to become home owners and to maintain their homes.~,,,,,,a ...... requested for tNs projcct is $466,000. ..... ph ~augmers of Zeio ehad Proposer- Daughters of Zeiophehad, inc. Description- Thc Daughters ofZciophchad i, ,~ ,,,,,~pront group dcdicatcd to cstabiishing a ,h,~ .... ~ = ,:---,,8 pro,mn that will hcip homcicss women bccomc cconomicaiiy indcpcndcnt t~ough a spiritually suppomve traimng program. ~ ne home wm =~ ...... ~u~ [ w o to thee women with a maximum of tHee chidren each. They will be Wuie to may in the home tbr up to (24) ~..,' o m~,,m~ as they pmticipatc in educational and or job training courses and ilnd suitabic housing mid cmpioymcnt. ~mount rcqucstcd is $i39,242.00. i0. Otilcc Spacc Proposcr- ~,~,~, ~,,,,. Housing corporation Description- ~-+ ~:+~ .... . ,,[e,~[,, Housing Co¢oration is requesting ihnding to assist w~tn rentm expense ota new OiilCg. 'i ney .,,, ~ ,~..ng from Limited Panncrsifip. Thc amount of ~ndh{g rcqucstcd is $ i 5,000.00. ,)91 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Meeting Date: March 15, 2000 Item Number: 8 .A. ,Subject: Nomination/Appointment to the Joint Accident Review Board County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: ~~ Board Action Requested: Nominate/Appoint Members to serve on the Joint Accident Review Board Summary of Information: Staff requests that the following persons be nominated/appointed/ reappointed by the Board of Supervisors to serve on the Joint Accident Review Board. The Joint Accident Review Board reviews automobile accidents involving drivers of County and Public School vehicles. Under the existing Rules of Procedure, appointments to boards and committees are nominated at one meeting and appointed at the subsequent meeting unless the Rules of Procedure are suspended by a unanimous vote of the Board members present. Nominees are voted on in the order in which they are nominated. Preparer: Karen Russell Title: Risk Manager Attachments No BO,,~RD OF SDPERVISORS ARTHUR ~. WARREN CHAIRMAN CLOVER HILL DISTRICT RENNY BUSH HUMPHREY VICE CHAIRMAN MATOACA DISTRICT J. L. McHALE, III BERMUDA DISTRICT KELLY E. MILLER DALE DISTRICT EDWARD B. BARBER MIDLOTHIAN DISTRICT CHESTERFIELD COUN (Y P,O. Box 40 CHESTERFIELD, VIRGINIA 23832-0040 (804) 748-1211 MEMORANDUM LANE B. RAMSEY COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: The Honorable Members of the Board of Supervisors Lane B. Ramsey (~~/ February 25, 2000 Nomination/Appointments to the Joint Accident Review Board Staffrequests that the following persons be nominated/appointed/reappointed by the Board of Supervisors to serve on the Joint Accident Review Board. The Joint Accident Review Board reviews automobile accidents involving drivers of County and Public School vehicles. Ralph E. Bartley - Police David L. Daniels - Fire Scott B. Smedley- Utilities Robert J. Pratt - General Services Robert A. Milton - Fleet Management James R. White, Jr. - Risk Management Sharon Utley - School Transportation Robert Campbell - School Facilities Dr. Michael McEvoy - Public Schools Edward S. Guice - Alternate Perry Hornbarger - Alternate Robert B. Wilson - Alternate Jeffrey L. Jeter- Alternate Leonard E. Wells - Alternate Jacob D. Kegris - Alternate Edward T. Atkins - Alternate Preston R. Simmons- Alternate Wayne Kitchen - Alternate The appointees are authorized to assign their board tasks to their designee in the event of the appointee's absence from a regular Joint Accident Review Board meeting. If you would like additional information, please contact Ms. Karen Russell at 796-2128. Providing a FIRST CHOICE community through excellence in public service. ATTACHMENT TO AGENDA ITEM: Nomination/Appointment to the Joint Accident Review Board Background The Joint Accident Review Board was established by the Board of Supervisors in january 1970. The Chesterfield County Public School Administration has participated voluntarily since January 1970. The Board's procedures are governed by Administrative Procedures Policy Number 800-4. Due to changes in staff, the membership of the JARB appointments need to be updated. Why The purpose of the JARB is to make recommendations and take actions to improve motor vehicle safety; and reduce the Public School and County's liability exposure. A driver with repeated poor driving judgement may lose driving privileges. Role The policy applies to all Chesterfield County and Public School employees and volunteers who operate County or School Board owned motor vehicles. It also applies to Chesterfield County Health Department state employees who use County or vehicles trader the COOP agreement. The JARB reviews all motor vehicle accidents to decide whether the vehicle operator did everything reasonably possible to prevent the accident. CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 3 .Meeting Date: March 15, 2000 Item Number: I Subject: Application for and Acceptance of a Virginia Department of Aviation Grant and Associated Appropriation of Funds for an Airport Improvement Project County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: As outlined below, authorize the County Administrator to apply for and accept a State Airport Improvement Grant, appropriation of Grant funds, and award a contract to the lowest bidder. ,Summary of Information: This item requests Board approval to apply for and accept a Virginia Department of Aviation (VDA) Grant, enter into the necessary contracts, and appropriate and transfer funds for a fiscal year 1999/00 Airport Improvement Project. 1. Design, engineering and construction of Helicopter Parking Pads $150,000 This item requests Board approval to appropriate and transfer funds as follows: Preparer: State Appropriation $120,000 Local Match 30,000 $150,000 ~~. Calabro ~'-~ Yes Attachments: No Title: Director, Aviation Services CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 2 of 3 Meeting Date: March 15, 2000 Item Number: Suna~aryof Information: (Continued) Funds are available in the Airport Capital Projects fund. current balance of $216,600. This fund has a Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors: 2. Authorize the County Administrator to accept a VDA Grant for this project and enter into a contract with the Commonwealth of Virginia for expenditure of said funds. 3. Authorize the County Administrator to execute contract amendment number ten (10) with Delta Airport Consultants, Inc. for design, engineering, and consultant services. 4. Authorize the County Administrator to enter into contracts with the applicable lowest responsible bidder. 5. Appropriation of all state ($120,000) and transfer of county funds ($30,000) for this Airport Improvement Project. CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 3 of 3 Meetina Date: March 15. 2000 Number Budclet and Mana.qement Comments' This request is for appropriation of state grant funds in the amount of $120,000 and transfer of local funds in the amount $30,000 to design, engineer, and construct helicopter parking pads at the Chesterfield County Airport. Sufficient funds are available in the Airport capital improvement fund for this transfer. Preparer: Rebecca T. Dickson Title: Director, Budget & Manaqement CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page '1 of 2 Meetin~l Date: March 15, 2000 Item Number: 8.B.2.a. Subject: Consideration of Change Order to RCC Consultants for Reimbursable Expenses County Administrator's Comments: County ~dmini~trator: Board Action Requested: Authorize the County Administrator to execute change order with RCC Consultants, Inc. in the amount of $53,000. Summary of Information: In February, 1997, the County entered into a contract with RCC Consultants, Inc. for consultant service for a new 800 MHZ Trunked Radio System. Although reimbursable expenses are allowed by the contract, the previously approved contract amounts did not include these expenses incurred by RCC Consultants, Inc. Reimbursable expenses, including those incurred to date, are anticipated to be $53,000. Staff requests authorization to increase the purchase order by $53,000. Preparer: Title: Assistant to the County Administrator Attachments: ~--~ Yes No CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 2 of 2 Meetino Date: March 15. 2000 Number Budget and Mana.qement Comments: This change order in the amount of $53,000 for the Emergency Communications Upgrade project adjusts RCC Consultant's professional services contract for rei~urseable expenses. The increase is reflective of anticipated allowable rei~urseable expenses, including those incurred to date. Project funds are available. Preparer: r~v~_','',''-' Title:Director, Budqet&Manaqement RebeccaT. Dickson 099 Meetin~l Date: CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA March 15, 2000 Item Number: Page 1 of 2 8.B.2.b. Subiect: Change Orders to the Design and Construction Contracts for the Juvenile and Domestic Relations Court Project County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested. Authorize the County Administrator to execute offsetting change orders to the design contract with Moseley, Harris and McClintock and the construction contract with Kenbridge Construction Company for the Juvenile and Domestic Relations Court project for additional construction costs associated with an architect/engineer error in the construction documents. Summary of Information: On November 24, 1998, the Board of Supervisors approved the award of a construction contract to Kenbridge Construction Company for the construction of the replacement Juvenile and Domestic Relations Court Facility. After construction was well under way, the contractor discovered an error in the drawings for roof framing that required rework of construction in place. The cost of this rework is $16,455. Execution of these offsetting change orders will cause the architect/engineer to bear the full cost of the error. Preparer: - Francis M P~taro Title: Director of General Services Attachments: [-~ Yes No CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 2 of 2 Meetino Date: March 15. 2000 Number Bud.qet and Mana.clement Comments: This item requests Board approval to authorize the County Administrator to execute offsetting change orders to the design contract with Moseley, Harris and McClintock and the construction contract with Kenbridge Construction Company. Because the two change orders offset each other, there is no financial impact to the project's budget. Preparer: Rebecca T. Dickson Title: Director, Budget & Manaqement 1 01. Meeting Date: March 15, 2000 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Item Number: Page !of2 8.B.3.a. Subject: Resolution Recognizing April 2000 as Confederate History and Heritage Month County_ Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Adoption of attached Resolution Summary of Information: Mr. Barber has requested that the attached resolution be adopted, based on a request by Camp 1343, Sons of Confederate Veterans. This resolution is in recognition of the historical implications and sacrifices of the Confederacy by declaring April 2000 as Confederate History and Heritage Month. .,]~aldJ. Ka~ ' //'; Attachments: Yes [---] No Director, Public AfFairs RECOGNIZING APRIL 2000 AS "CONFEDERATE HISTORY AND HERITAGE MONTH" WHEREAS, it was April when the Confederate States of America began and ended its struggle for independence; and WHEREAS, Virginia has long recognized the men and women of the Confederacy in tribute and with monuments throughout the Commonwealth; and WHEREAS, the officers and enlisted men of the Confederate Army and Navy made many sacrifices on behalf of their cause; and WHEREAS, this unique period in the history of Virginia and our nation deserves appropriate recognition and remembrance; and WHEREAS, it is fitting to respect the honor and quest for self- determination that marked the Confederate States of America; and WHEREAS, at war's end, the Confederate forces pledged their allegiance to the United States of America and returned home in peace to forge a new and unified nation; and WHEREAS, this period in history remains a source of intense pride, honor and respect for millions of Americans who are the descendants of these men and women of the Confederacy. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors hereby recognizes April 2000 as "Confederate History and Heritage Month," and urges all Chesterfield County residents to reflect on this historic period in our nation's past. CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of i Meetin~l Date: March 15, 2000 Recognizing March 2000 as Purchasing Month Item Number: $.B.3.b. County Administrator's Comments: County Admin istrator: Board Action Requested: Consent item resolution to declare March 2000 as Purchasing Month. Summary of Information: Purchasing associations throughout the world participate in Purchasing month as recognition for the purchasing profession and its value to the economic conditions within all localities, states, and nations. Public purchasing requires: that ethical principles govern all conduct; a working knowledge of a wide range of goods and services; up-to-date knowledge of legalities and regulations; ability to communicate and skills to work with a diversity of users and vendors; and technical knowledge in areas such as purchasing methods, contracting, source selection, bidding, negotiation, evaluation methods, scheduling, and contract administration. It is requested that Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors participate in supporting this recognition on a local basis. Attachments: Yes No Title: Assistant Director of Purchasing RECOGNIZING HARCH 2000 AS "PURCHASING HONTH" WHEREAS, the purchasing and materials management prefession has a significant role in the quality, efficiency and prefitability of business and gevernment threugheut the United States; and WHEREAS, the purchasing and materials management prefessien werks fer private and public, and prefit and nenprefit organizations; and WHEREAS, in addition to the purchase of goods and services, the purchasing and materials management profession engages in or has direct responsibility for functions such as executing, implementing and administering contracts; developing forecast and procurement strategies; supervising and/or monitoring the flow and storage of materials; and developing working relations with suppliers and with other departments within the organization; and WHEREAS, the purchasing and materials management profession has tremendous influence on the economic conditions in the United States, with an accumulative purchasing power running into the billions of dollars; and WHEREAS, purchasing or procurement operations range from departments of one person to several thousand; and WHEREAS, governmental purchasing and other associations around the world are sponsoring activities and special events to further educate and inform the general public on the role of purchasing within business, industry and government. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors hereby recognizes the month of March 2000 as "Purchasing Month" in Chesterfield County and encourages all citizens to join in commemorating this observance. Meeting Date: March 15, 2000 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Item Number: Pa-e] of] 8.B.3.¢. Subject: Resolution Recognizing the late Andrew (Angelo) Scmdato County_ Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: ~~ff Board Action Requested: Adoption of attached Resolution Summary_ of Information: Mr. Warren has requested that the attached resolution be adopted. This resolution is in recognition of the late Andrew Scrudato for his leadership and dedication to the citizens of Chesterfield County, the region and the nation. . ,//,~onald J. K~e, '/ ///~,'~- / Attachments: Yes [---] No Director, Public Affairs RECOGNIZING THE LATE ANDREW (ANGELO) SCRUDATO FOR HIS SERVICE TO THE REGION AND NATION WHEREAS, Mr. Andrew (Angelo) Scrudato was born in Jersey City, New Jersey on September 21, 1921; and WHEREAS, Mr. Scrudato served in the Civilian Conservation Corps in the years leading up to World War II; and WHEREAS, Mr. Scrudato also was a World War II veteran who served as a chief radio operator with the Merchant Marine during the Battle of the North Atlantic and throughout World War II; and WHEREAS, Mr. Scrudato left the service in 1945 and began working in the garment industry; and WHEREAS, Mr. Scrudato moved to the Richmond area in 1963 and worked in a leadership capacity in the garment industry until his retirement in 1985; and WHEREAS, Mr. Scrudato was President and CEO of Chesapeake Southern Dress Corporation; Marcath Corporation and Best Manufacturing Corporation; and WHEREAS, Mr. Scrudato was a partner in the ?ocoshock Golf Club located at South Providence Road and Reams Road in Chesterfield County; and WHEREAS, Mr. Scrudato's passing on February 26, 2000 at the age of 78 took from us a patriotic citizen and a dedicated family man, business leader and friend of the community. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors recognizes the late Andrew (Angelo) Scrudato for his service to the region and nation, presents this resolution in his honor to his widow, Ms. Mary B. Scrudato; his son, Mr. Paul Scrudato; and his daughter, Ms. Lisa Olsen, and extends to them the Board's deepest sympathy in their loss. 107 Meeting Date: CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA March 15, 2000 Item Number: Page 1 of_~_3 8 .B.4. ,Subject: School Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Mid-Year Review for FY2000 County Administrator's Comments: CountyAdministrator: BoardAction Requested: The School Board requests the Board of Supervisors to transfer $163,800 from the ClP Reserve for School Projects to the School CIP fund for renovations at Bensley Elementary ($63,800), and at the Thomas R, Fulghum Center ($100,000), and to decrease the Thomas Dale project by $3,293 for the reduction in the State school construction funds. Summary oflnformation: At the mid-year School CIP review, the School Board approved the attached resolution requesting the Board of SuperviSOrS to approve the changes described below. Thomas Dale Renovations ~ State Superintendent's Memo #227, dated December 21, 1999, provided localities with their revised entitlements for FY2000. The school construction funds, which were all budgeted in the Thomas Dale project, have been reduced from $1,531,110 to $1,527,817, This is a reduction of $3,293 that must be taken from the Thomas Dale renovation project at this time. Bensley Elementary Renovations - Costs associated with the renovations at Bensley Elementary were estimated at $43020,000. Purchased services (architect fees and building permits) and construction management costs were higher than anticipated. There is a need to transfer $63,800 of CIP Reserve funds to this project to cover the construction management costs that are estimated to be $68,000 (1.7% of the project cost). Preparer: !~~. B'~ Title: Attachments: Yes ~-~ No Superintendent CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD Of SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page2 of 3 Meeting Date; March 15, 2000 Item Number; Summary of Information (cont.)- Thomas R. Fulghum Center ~ The Southside Church of the Nazarene was acquired by the school system in September 1998 to be used for specialized programs. Initial expenses of $38,015 to prepare the building for occupancy have been expended. Additional renovation costs at this time are estimated to be $100,000. Request is being made to transfer CIP Reserve funds to cover this COst, Reserve for School Capital Projects - The current balance in the CIP Reserve is $353,587. Approval of the recommendations to use $163,800 for the projects described above would leave a balance of $189,787 in that account. CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 3 of 3 Meeting Date: March '15. 2000 Numbl~r Bud_~et and Mana.qement Comments: On February 22, 2000 the School Board took action to request that the Board of Supervisors approve a transfer from the School's CIP reserve in the amount of $163,800 to fund school capital projects. The balance in the School Capital Projects reserve is $353,587; transfer of $63,800 for Bensley Elementary for construction management charges and $100,000 for renovations to the church purchased in September, 1998 will leave an available balance of $189,787. Preparer: Rebecca T. Dickson Title: Director, Budget & Mana.qement _. 110 VIRGINIA: At a regular meeting of the Chesterfield County School Board held Tuesday evening, February 22, 2000, at seven- thirty o'clock in the Public Meeting Room at the Chesterfield County Courthouse Complex PRESENT: Dianne Pettitt, Chairman Marshall W. Trammell, Jr., Vice-Chairman Elizabeth Davis Lloyd A. Lenhart James R. Schroeder, D.D.S. RESOLUTION WHEREAS, the Reserve for School Capital Projects has a current balance of $353,587; and, WHEREAS, the Bensley Elementary renovation project needs management charges funding of $63,800; and, WHEREAS, additional renovation costs are estimated at $100,000 at the Thomas R. Fulghum Center; and, WHEREAS, CCPS received notification of a reduction in State school construction funds of $3,293 through State Superintendent's Memo #227 dated December 21, 1999; NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that on motion of Dr. Schroeder, seconded by Mr. Lenhart, the School Board requests the Board of Supervisors to approve the transfer of $163,800 from the Reserve for School Capital Projects to the School CIP fund for management charges for the Bensley Elementary renovation project, and for additional renovation costs at the Thomas R. Fulghum Center, and reduce the Thomas Dale renovation project by $3,293 to reflect the reduction of State school construction funds for FY2000. Patricia W. ~rtlar~ Clerk~ ~'il'l~an~ C. 13~sher, Jr., Superintendent 111 .New Facilitie,~ Spring Run Elementary New Elementary #2 New Matoaca High School Thomas R Fulghum Center Total New Facilities Renovations Bensley Elem Renovations C. E. Curtis Elem Renov/Cafe & Gym Grange Hall Elem Renovations C. C. Wells Etem. Renovations Chester Middle Renovations L. C. Bird High Renovations Clover Hill Renovations Manchester HS Specialty Center Meadowbrook HS Renovations Monacan HS Specialty Center Thomas Dale High Renovations Technical Center Renovations Total Renovations .,S upe rvision/Debt/Ot he r Supervision & Contingency Financial/Human Resources System School CIP Debt Transfer School Maintenance Technology infrastructure & Equipment Total Supervision/Debt/Other TOTAL ALL SCHOOL CIP PROJECTS CHESTERFIELD COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS SCHOOL CIP PROJECT REPORT CURRENT STATUS (as of December 31, 1999) Beginning Current Revised Needs Surplus _FY00 Budaet Budaet (a~ ~ {_Deficit} 13,045,813 13,045,813 13,045,813 0 710,437 710,437 710,437 0 6,906,700 6,731,700 (a) 6,731,700 0 2,003.015 ~ ~ ~100,000) 22,665,965 22,490,965 22,590,965 (100,000) Ailachmenl A- 1 Memo ,~ 1 Status In progress In progress In progress In progress 4,020,000 4,020,000 4,083,800 (63,800) In progress 300,000 300,000 300,000 0 Delayed 300,000 300,000 300,000 0 Delayed 3,896,519 3,896,519 3,896,519 0 In progress 8,125,341 8,125,341 8,125,341 0 In progress 12,182,390 12,182,390 12,182,390 0 In progress 2.800,000 2,800,000 2,800,000 0 In progress 1.607,729 173,210 (b) 173,210 (0) Newproject 28.890,497 29,065,497 (a) 29,065,497 0 In progress 1,032,800 936,209 (b) 936,209 0 New project 31,592,455 33,123,565 (b) 33,120,272 3,293 In progress 7,100.000 ~ 7,100,000 0 In progress 101,847,731 1 02,022,731 102,083,238 (60,50'~) 6.629.182 6.629,182 6,629,182 (0) In progress 120.000 120,000 120,000 0 New project 6,664,737 6.664,737 6.664,737 0 In progress 6.331,903 10.139,603 (c) 10.139.603 0 In progress 1,2,543,415 14,543,415 ['c) 14,543,415 0 in progress 32 289.237 ~8,096,93¢ §8,096,937 LO) $156,802.933 $162.610,633 $162,771,140 ($!60,507) (a) Funds borrowed in FY99 returned from New Maloaca to Meadowbrook (S175.000) (b) lsl Quader Review rewsed allocahon ol Slate CIP funds: Reduce Manchesler Specially (1.434.519). reduce Monacan Specialty ('S96.591). and increase Thomas Dale ~1 531.110 (c) Budgel i~reased $5.807.700 by BOS 9/8/99 from CIP Reserve ($,3.807.700 to malor mainlenance and $2.0OO.0OO to Technology). 112 New Facilities Spring Run Elementary New Elementary #2 New Matoaca High School Thomas R. Fulghum Center Total New Facilities Renovations Bensley Elem Renovations C. E. Curtis Elem Renov/Cafe & Gym Grange Hall Elem Renovations C. C. Wells Elem. Renovations Chester Middle Renovations L. C. Bird High Renovations Clover Hill Renovations Manchester HS Specialty Center Meadowbrook HS Renovations Monacan HS Specialty Center Thomas Dale High Renovations Technical Center Renovations Total Renovations Supervision/Debt/Other Supervision & Contingency Financial/Human Resources System School CIP Debt Transfer School Maintenance Technology Infrastructure & Equipment Total Supervision/Debt/Other TOTAL ALL SCHOOL CIP PROJECTS CHESTERFIELD COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS SCHOOL CIP PROJECT REPORT RECOMMENDED REVISIONS 1996 GO 1996 GO CtP Other Bonds Interest Reserve Revenue 100,000 0 0 100,000' 0 63,800 0 0 63,800 (3,293) (3,293) $0 $163,800 ($3,293) AttachmenI ~,-2 Memo = i ~ _Total Revisions 0 0 0 100.000 100.000 63,800 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (3.293) 0 60.507 0 0 3 0 0 0 S160507 113 ,.New Facilities Spring Run Elementary New Elementary #2 New Matoaca High School Thomas R. Fulghum Center Total New Facilities _Renovations Bensley Elem Renovations C. E. Curtis Elem Renov/Cafe & Gym Grange Hall Elem Renovations C. C. Wells Elem. Renovations Chester Middle Renovations L. C. Bird High Renovations Clover Hill Renovations Manchester HS Specialty Center Meadowbrook HS Renovations Monacan HS Specialty Center Thomas Dale High Renovations Technical Center Renovations Total Renovations Supervision/Debt/Other Supervision & Contingency Financial/Human Resources System School CIP Debt Transfer School Maintenance Technology Infrastructure & Equipment Total Supervision/Debt/Other TOTAL ALL SCHOOL CIP PROJECTS Attachment A.3 Memo =19 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS SCHOOL ClP PROJECT REPORT EFFECT OF RECOMMENDED REVISIONS Revised Budget Surplus w/Adjustments IDeficit} 13,045.813 0 710,437 0 6,731,700 0 2,103,015 0 22,,590,965 0 4.083,800 0 300,000 0 300,000 0 3,896,519 0 8.125,341 0 12. t $2,390 0 2.800,000 0 173,210 (0) 29065,497 0 936.209 0 33120,272 0 7,100,000 0 102,083,238 (0) 6,629.182 (0) 120.000 0 6.664.737 0 10.139603 0 .1,4,543,415 0 .38,096,937 ~ $162.771,140 ($0) 114 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 2 Meeting Date: March 15, 2000 Item Number: 8.B.5. Subject: Request to Set a Public Hearing Date to Consider the Restriction of Through Truck Traffic on a Section of Bermuda Hundred Road County_ Administrator's Comments: County_ Administrator: Board Action Requested: The Board is requested to set April 12, 2000, as a public hearing date to consider the prohibition of through truck traffic on Bermuda Hundred Road between Meadowville Road and Kingston Avenue. Summary of Information: Mr. McHale requested staff to initiate the process to consider a request to prohibit any through truck or truck and trailer or semi-trailer combination, except pickup or panel trucks from using Bermuda Hundred Road (Route 697) between Meadowville Road (Route 618) and Kingston Avenue (Route 4841). The recommended alternate route is Kingston Avenue (Route 4841), Route 10, Rivers Bend Boulevard (Route 4840), and Meadowville Road (Route 618). The Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) has five (5) criteria it considers when a prohibition is requested. Based on staff's preliminary review, this request will satisfy three (3) of VDOT's five (5) criteria for imposing a prohibition, in that: 1) there is a reasonable alternate route, 2) the route is classified as a local or collector road, and 3) there are 12 dwellings per 1000 feet of roadway along Bermuda Hundred Road. This request will not meet the remaining two (2) criteria in that 1) the volume of through trucks does not exceed VDOT's 50 per day minimum volume, and 2) the accident history of the roadway does not indicate that it is not suitable for truck traffic. A request that satisfies at least three (3) of VDOT's five (5) criteria will generally qualify for a restriction. Preparer: ~ .~C ~'~,~1~ Title: J J. McCracken o'-- Agen447 Director of Transportation Attachments: Yes No CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 2 of 2 Summary. of Information: (Continued) Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Board set April 12, 2000, as a public hearing date to consider a through truck traffic restriction on Bermuda Hundred Road between Meadowville Road and Kingston Avenue, and authorize the advertisement for that hearing. District: Bermuda llG 1-295 1000 0 1000 2000 Feet Proposed Restriction Alternate Route mmm ,m mm mm mmm mmm ,m mm mmmm m mmm Bermuda Hundred Road Through Truck Traffic Restriction CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 2 Meetin~ Date: March 15, 2000 Item Number: 8.B.6. Sub_iect: VDOT's FY01 Primary Preallocation Hearing County_ Administrator's Comments; County_ Administrator: Board Action Requested; The Board is requested to approve the attached priority list of highway projects and statement regarding Chesterfield's primary and interstate road construction needs. Summary_ of information: The Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) will conduct their annual "preallocation" public hearing at 9:00 a.m. on April 5, 2000, in the Harris Hall Auditorium at Virginia State University. The purpose of the hearing is to receive comments from local government officials and citizens that will assist the Commonwealth Transportation Board (CTB) in updating the Six Year Improvement Program. The Six Year Improvement Program identifies road improvements which VDOT intends to construct within the next six years. VDOT's hearing provides the County with the opportunity to recommend priorities to the CTB for Chesterfield's primary and interstate road needs. The County's Secondary Six Year Improvement Program for improvements to the County's secondary road system will be considered by the Board of Supervisors in a separate agenda item. (Continued on next page) Preparer: ~_~/~/~/~, ~~ ~.J. McCracken Agen 443 Attachments: Yes Title: Director of Transportation CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 2 of 2 Summary_ of Information: (Continued) The Board of Supervisors adopted a priority list of projects on February 24, 1999, and presented the list to the CTB at last year's preallocation hearing. Staff recommends the following changes to that priority list: Powhite Parkway widening to four lanes from Route 288 to Coalfield Road should be considered part of the Route 288 Project and added to the Route 288 Project. Route 360 widening to eight lanes from Route 288 to Swift Creek should be added as the County's seventh priority. Huguenot Road widening to six lanes from Route 60 to Alverser Drive should be added as the County's eighth priority. Adjust priority listing. The recommended priority list is shown in Attachment A. A location map and description of each project is shown in Attachment B. A recommended statement to be presented at the public hearing is shown in Attachment C. The total cost of the recommended Chesterfield priority projects is approximately $230 million. The Richmond District consists of fourteen counties and eight cities/towns. The District's total primary and interstate construction allocation for last year was approximately $76 million. Recommendation: Staff recommends: 1) The Board approve the recommended priority list of highway projects; 2) The Chairman of the Board present the approved priority list and the attached statement to the CTB at the public heating; and 3) The approved priority list and statement be forwarded to Chesterfield County's Legislative Delegation. District; Countywide CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS RECOMMENDED PRIORITY LIST OF HIGHWAY PROJECTS MARCH 15, 2000 NEW OLD COST IN PRIORITY PRIORITY PROJECT DESCRIPTION FROM TO MILLIONS 6 Powhite-4 Lanes B. Route 288 Coalfield Rd. $1.0 C. Route 1 1-95 4 4 Route 60 6 Lanes Courthouse Rd. Old Buckingham Rd. 5 5 1-295 Interchange Meadowville Rd. -- 6 7 Centralia Road Intersect. Impr. Route 10 Chester Rd. $6.0 $14.0 $12.0 $2.1 $7.0 $20.0 $4.0 7 - Route 360 8 Lanes Route 288 Swift Creek $1.5 8 - Hu~]uenot Road 6 Lanes Route 60 Alverser Dr. $1.2 9 8 New Freeways Prel. Engr. & A. Coalfield Rd. Route 360 $1.5 (Powhite Pky. Ext., Right-of-Way B. Powhite Pky. Ext. 1-95 $4.5 East/West, C. East/West Freeway 1-85 $1.0 North/South) 10 9 New Freeway Prel. Engr. 11 10 Route 360 6 Lanes 12 11 Signalization Var. Locations 13 12 Sight & Sound Powhite Pky., Barriers Route 288 14 13 Park/Ride Commuter Facilities Parking Lots 15 14 Remove Tolls Powhite Pky. Ext. 1-95 1-295 $0.8 A. Winterpock Rd. Woodlake Pky. $4.8 B. Woodlake Pky. Otterdale Rd. $10.3 Countywide -- $1.0 Countywide -- $15.0 Countywide .- $1.0 Chippenham Pky. Route 288 $60.0 TOTAL $222.7 Project included in VDOT's Current Six Year Improvement Program. * Route 360 from Swift Creek to Winterpock Road - P.E. only, no Construction Funds * Route 10 from 1-95 to Meadowville Road - P.E. only, no Construction Funds Project Recommended to be Added ATTACHMENT A I RECOMMENDED PRIORITY LIST OF HIGHWAY PROJECTS MARCH 15, 2000 NORTH IIIIII PRIORITY PROJECT UNDER CONSTRUCTION QSIGNALIZATION C~SIGHT / SOUND BARRIERS PARK / RIDE FACILITIES QREMOVE TOLLS POWHITE PKY. AI'rACHMENT B I PAGE 1 of 3 e e RECOMMENDED PRIORITY PROJECT DESCRIPTIONS Route 288 North (Lucks Lane to Route 60) Route 288 should remain as the County's first priority. VDOT provides $54 million for Route 288 from Lucks Lane to Route 60 in the current six year improvement program. Construction is anticipated to begin this summer on this section of Route 288. Powhite Parkway, from Route 288 to Coalfield Road, needs to be widened to four lanes due to the construction of Route 288 and should be considered part of the Route 288 Project. This section of Powhite Parkway carries approximately 15,000 vehicles per day and this volume is expected to increase to 40,000 vehicles per day by the year 2015. Route 360 (Swift Creek to Winterpock Road) The widening of Route 360 to eight lanes from Swift Creek to Winterpock Road should be the County's second priority. This section of Route 360 carries between 39,000 and 52,000 vehicles per day and this volume is expected to increase to between 59,000 and 79,000 vehicles per day by the year 2015. Construction funds for this project are not in VDOT's current six year program. ~ ( Route 1 to Meadowville Road ) The widening of Route 10 to six lanes from Route 1 to Meadowville Road should be the County's third priority. This section of Route 10 is carrying approximately 36,000 vehicles per day and this volume is expected to increase to 46,000 vehicles per day by the year 2015. The County has completed design of Route 10 from Interstate 95 to Meadowville Road and the Commonwealth Transportation Board approved the design in fall, 1999. Construction funds for this project are not in VDOT's current six year program. Route 60 (Courthouse Road to Old Buckingham Road) The widening of Route 60 to six lanes from Courthouse Road to Old Buckingham Road should be the County's fourth priority. This section of Route 60 is carrying approximately 40,000 vehicles per day and this volume is expected to increase to 59,000 vehicles per day by the year 2015. This project is not in VDOT's current six year program. Interstate 295/Meadowville Road Interchange Construction of an Interstate 295/Meadowville Road interchange should be the County's fifth priority. This interchange is needed to help promote economic development and to prevent unacceptable levels of service in the future on Route 10, Meadowville Road and North Enon Church Road. The County has completed the design and has the right-of-way needed for construction of the interchange. This project is not in VDOT's current six year program. ~41igaIJa.~ (Route 10 to Chester Road) Intersection improvements at various locations on Centralia Road from Route 10 to Chester Road should be the County's sixth priority. Centralia Road carries approximately 11,000 vehicles per day. A high volume of truck traffic and the lack of turn lanes reduces the operational efficiency of the road. This project is not included in VDOT's current six year program. Route 360 (Route 288 to Swift Creek) The widening of Route 360 to eight lanes from Route 288 to Swift Creek should be the County's seventh priority. This section of Route 360 carries between 52,000 and 63,000 vehicles per day and this volume is expected to increase to between 79,000 and 90,000 vehicles per day by the year 2015. This project is not in VDOT's current six year program. Se 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. Huguenot Road (Route 60 to Alverser Drive) The widening of Huguenot Road to six lanes from Ronte 60 to Alverser Drive should be the County's eighth priority. This section of Huguenot Road is carrying approximately 36,000 vehicles per day and this volume is expected to increase to 52,000 vehicles per day by the year 2015. This project is not in VDOT's current six year program. Powhite Parkway Extension; East-West Freeway; North-South Freeway Preliminary engineering and right-of-way acquisition for thc County's "outer beltway" (Powhite Parkway Extension from Route 288 to Route 360, East-West Freeway from Route 360 to Interstate 95, and North-South Freeway from East-West Freeway to Interstate 85) should be the County's ninth priority. Preliminary engineering is needed to properly identify the location of the "beltway." Right-of-way should be acquired where growth threatens to block the corridors. This project is not in VDOT's current six year program. New Freeway (I-95/I-295 Connector) Preliminary engineering for a connector between Interstate 95 in the Walthall area and Interstate 295 should be the County's tenth priority. The eastern area of the County has been designated for major commercial/industrial development and this area of the County is developing rapidly. As development occurs, Route 10 (from Interstate 95 to the Appomattox River) will be the major highway serving the area. Route 10 will not accommodate the expected traffic from the commercial/industrial developments. Extending the County's planned East-West Freeway from Interstate 95 to Interstate 295 will help reduce traffic on Route 10. Preliminary engineering is needed to determine the feasibility of this connector. This project is not included in VDOT's current six year program. Route 360 (Winterpock Road to Otterdale Road) The widening of Route 360 to six lanes from Winterpock Road to Otterdale Road should be the County's eleventh priority. This section of Ronte 360 carries between 19,000 and 33,000 vehicles per day and this volume is expected to increase to 50,000 vehicles per day by the year 2015. This project is not included in VDOT's current six year program. Signalization (Countywide) The installation of traffic signals at various intersections should be the County's twelfth priority. Signalization requests on primary roads through Board members include; Route 360 at Lynview Drive, Route 360 at Broadstone Road, Route 10 at Ecoff Avenue, Route 10 at Parker Lane, River Road at Picket Avenue and signal improvements along the Route 60 corridor. VDOT's current six year program includes approximately $200,000 each year for signalization needs throughout the entire Richmond District. Sight and Sound Barriers (Countywide) The construction of sight and sound barriers along Powhite Parkway and Route 288 should be the County's thirteenth priority. These barriers are needed to reduce the impacts of the roadways on adjoining neighborhoods. This project is not included in VDOT's current six year program. Park and Ride Facilities (Countywide) Preliminary engineering to identify potential park and ride facility locations should be the County's fourteenth priority. These facilities will be needed in the future to help reduce Countywide traffic congestion. This project is not included in VDOT's current six year program. Remove Tolls on the Powhite Parkway Funding to retire the debt on Powhite Parkway from Chippenham Parkway to Route 288 and allow the tolls to be removed from Powhite Parkway should be the County' s fifteenth priority. VDOT's FY01 PRIMARY PREALLOCATION HEARING April 5, 2000 I am Arthur Warren, Chairman of the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors. I appreciate the opportunity to appear before you today to present Chesterfield County's primary and interstate road needs. For the record, I am submitting Chesterfield County's priority list of highway projects. I believe you have a copy of the list. In the interest of time, I will only address our highest priorities. First, let me thank the Department for the progress we have seen on the Chippenham Parkway project. Completion of the improvements on Chippenham Parkway will be a tremendous benefit to Chesterield and the entire region. Let me again this year thank the Department for its support in getting funding for the construction of ATTACHMENT C PAGE 1OF4 Route 288. The completion of Route 288 remains Chesterfield's highest priority. We are pleased that construction on the first section of Route 288 from Powhite Parkway to Lucks Lane is underway. However, we are concerned that the start of construction on the second section from Lucks Lane to Route 60 has been deferred more than a year from the original schedule for start of construction. We ask that you move forward with advertisement of the next section of Route 288 at the earliest possible date. Also, Powhite Parkway needs to be widened to four lanes from Route 288 to Coalfield Road due to the construction of Route 288. It is requested that this section of Powhite Parkway be added to the Route 288 Project. Now let me talk with you about a couple of our other priorities that still need to be addressed. Route 360 should be widened to eight lanes from Swift Creek to Winterpock Road. This section of Route 360 is carrying 52,000 vehicles per da~. Preliminary ATTACHMENT C PAGE 2 OF 4 engineering on the project is underway. We need money for construction. We. request you transfer funds you already have in your program from the section of Route 360 from Route 288 to Genito Road to the Winterpock section to allow advertisement of this project. Developers are obligated to improve almost half of the Genito section, so the transfer would allow us to get both sections improved. Route 10 in the Enon area is the next project I want to discuss. It needs to be widened to six lanes from Route I to Meadowville Road. Construction plans have been developed for the section from 1-95 to Meadowville Road. The Commonwealth Transportation Board approved the design on this project in September, 1999 and the plans are ready to go to construction. We need funding for at least the first section from 1-95 to Ware Bottom Spring Road. In closing, let me thank you, Mr. Kornblau, the Central Office, District Staff and the Residency with ATTACHMENT C I PAGE 3 OF 4 whom we work on a daily basis, for all of your help. Your staff has done an outstanding job in helping Chesterfield County address some of its transportation needs. We look forward to working with you in the future. I will be glad to answer any questions. ATTACHMENT C PAGE 4 OF 4 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Meeting Date: March 15, 2000 Item Number: 8.B. 7. Subject: Authorization to Appropriate and Transfer $30,000 From the Comprehensive Services Act Fund Balance to Chesterfield Community Services Board for Group Home for Adolescents. Coun _ty Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Staff requests that $30,000 be appropriated and transferred from the Comprehensive Services Act fund balance to Chesterfield Community Services Board to assist with the establishment of a group home for youth with mental retardation and autism. Summary. of Information: This item requests that there be a budget amendment in the amount of $30,000. The funds would be transferred from the Comprehensive Services Act fund balance to Chesterfield Community Services Board. The purpose of the funds are to assist with the start up of a group home for young persons with mental retardation and autism who are currently served in other settings through the Comprehensive Services Act. By operating our own home for autistic kids the County can reduce its annual cost of residential services by $300,000. The funds will be used to furnish a home and purchase a vehicle for transportation. The group home is to be established after the study of two Chesterfield County Process Action Teams. Preparer: Bradford S. Hammer Attachments: ~-~ Yes No Title: Deputy County Administrator CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 2 of 2 Meeting Date: March 15. 2000 Number Bud.qet and Management Comments: The item requests the Board of Supervisors to appropriate $30,000 from the Comprehensive Service's fund balance and transfer those funds to the Chesterfield County Community Services Board. These funds will be used to assist with the start up costs associated with a new group home for young persons with mental retardation and autism. These children are currently being served through other settings through the Comprehensive Services Act. As of June 30,1999, the fund balance for Comprehensive Services is $472,996. As a result of this action, the fund balance will be $442,996. Preparer: Rebecca T. Dickson Title: Director, Budget & Management CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of -3 Meetin~ Date: March 15, 2000 Item Number: 8.B. 8. Subject: Approval of Resolution and Request of Recreation Access Grant Funds for Irvin J. Horner Park and Authorization for the County Administrator to Enter Into an Agreement with VDOT for the Construction of the Access Road County. Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: The Board of Supervisors is requested to approve the attached resolution requesting grant funding up to $350,000 for the construction of an entrance road to Irvin J. Homer Park. The resolution also requests designation of the new roadway as a "Virginia Byway." The Board of Supervisors is also requested to authorize the County Administrator to enter into an agreement with VDOT for the construction of the access road. Summary_ of Information: Property for Irvin J. Homer Park was purchased with funds from the 1996 Bond Referendum. Irvin J. Horner Park is designated in the Parks and Recreation Master Plan as a District Park recreational facility. Grant funds from the VDOT Recreation Access Program are required to construct the entrance road into the Park. Matching funds of $100,000 will be available in the proposed FY2001 Capital Project, to bring the project total to $450,000. Facilities in this park will include 25 acre lake, fishing areas, water access, picnic areas, ball fields, court game area, and trail system. Preparer:M~' '~ '~~ Title: Director, Parks and Recreation Attachments: Yes ~-~ No CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 2 of 3 The Parks and Recreation Department is applying for a VDOT grant totaling $350,000 for construction of an access road to the Irvin Horner Park facility. The County's cost will be to match 50/50 the additional project costs over $250,000 as a stipulation of this grant. The $100,000 match will be paid for from bond fund dollars previously allocated to the Western Area Park project. This grant, if awarded, will provide $250,000 unmatched state dollars for construction of an access road. The next $100,000 of state dollars will need to be matched with $100,000 by the County for a total project cost of $450,000. This grant (totaling $350,000), and County bond fund dollars of approximately $1,450,000 will provide $1,800,000 total funds to develop the first phase of the Irvin J. Homer Park facility. This facility would provide general recreation found at other District Parks within the County, plus a lake. The construction of the access road is anticipated to be completed by the fall of 2001. Operating funding tbr the facility will be addressed in the FY2002 operating budget process. An additional $1,620,000 is included in the adopted FY 2000-2004 CIP for this facility. This FY2004 funding will address dollars needed for ballfields, picnic shelters, bathroom facilities, trails, and other amenities. CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 3 of 3 Meetina Date: March 15. 2000 Number Budqet and Mana.qement Comments: The Board is being asked to approve a resolution requesting Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) grant funding for Irvin J. Horner Park (previously known as Western Area Park), and authorize an agreement with VDOT for the construction of an access road to the park. Funding for both the $100,000 in County matching funds and the $350,000 in grant funds are included in the proposed Capital Improvement Program for FY2001-2005 in FY2001. These funds will allow improved access to the facility. Preparer: %~'~ ~'~- ~);~i/c'''-Y-'x Title: Director, Budqet & Manaqement Rebecca T. Dickson RESOLUTION FOR RECREATIONAL AREA ACCESS ROAD FUNDS IRVIN J. HORNER PARK WHEREAS, the Irvin J. Hornet Park is owned and is to be developed by the County of Chesterfield as a recreational facility serving the residents of Chesterfield County and adjoining counties; and WHEREAS, the facility is in need of adequate access; and WHEREAS, the right-of-way of the proposed access is provided by the County of Chesterfield at no cost to the state; and WHEREAS, the procedure governing the allocation of recreational access funds as set forth in Section 33.1-223, Code of Virginia, 1996, as amended, requires joint action by the Department of Conservation and Historic Resources and the Highway and Transportation Board; and WHEREAS, a statement of policy agreed upon between the said Director and Board approves the use of such funds for the construction of access roads to publicly-owned recreational areas; and WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County has duly adopted a zoning ordinance pursuant to Article 8 (Section 15.2-2280 et. seq.), Chapter 11, title 15.2; and WHEREAS, it appears to the Board that all requirements of the law have been met to permit the Director of Conservation and Historic Resources to designate Irvin J. Homer Park as a recreational facility and further permit the Virginia Highway and Transportation Board to provide funds for access to this public recreation area in accordance with Section 33.1-223, Code of Virginia, 1966, as amended; and WHEREAS, the Board acknowledges that pursuant to the provisions of Section 33.1-233, as amended, this road shall be designated a "Virginia Byway" and recommends the State Highway and Transportation Board in cooperation with the Director of Conservation and Historic Resources, take the appropriate action to implement this designation. Further, the Board agrees, that in keeping with the intent of Section 33.1-63, to use its good office to reasonably protect the aesthetic or cultural value of this road. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County hereby requests the Director of Conservation and Historic Resources to designate the Irvin J. Homer Park as a Hublic recreation area; and to recommend to the State Highway and Transportation Board that recreational access funds be allocated for an access road to service said Park. AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Virginia Highway and Transportation Board is hereby requested to allocate the necessary recreational access funds to provide a suitable access road as hereinbefore described. CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 MeetingDate: March 15, 2000 Item Number: Subject: Acceptance of a Parcel of Land Along the East Right of Way Line of Hopkins Road and North Right of Way Line of Panola Road from Trustees of Richmond KMER Church of the Nazarene County_ Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors accept the conveyance of a parcel of land containing 0.113 acres along the east right of way line of Hopkins Road (State Route 637) and north right of way line of Panola Road (State Route 2463) from Trustees of Richmond KMER Church of the Nazarene, and authorize the County Administrator to execute the necessary deed. Summary of Information: It is the policy of the County to acquire right of way whenever possible through development to meet the ultimate road width as shown on the County Thoroughfare Plan. The dedication of this parcel conforms to that plan, and will decrease the right of way costs for road improvements when constructed. District: Dale . Harmon Attachments: Yes Title: Riqht of Way Manaqer VICINITY SKETCH ACCEPTANCE OF A PARCEL OF LAND ALONG THE EAST.RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF HOPKINS ROAD AND NORTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF PANOLA ROAD FROM TRUSTEES OF RICHMOND KMER CHURCH OF THE NAZARENE CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 MeetingDate: March 15, 2000 Item Number: 8.B.9.b. Subject: Acceptance of a Parcel of Land Along the West Right of Way Line of Bermuda Orchard Lane from Samuel E. Smelly and Virginia W. Smelly County_ Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors accept the conveyance of a parcel of land containing 0.101 acres along the west right of way line of Bermuda Orchard Lane (State Route 828) from Samuel E. Smelly and Virginia W. Smelly, and authorize the County Administrator to execute the necessary deed. Summary_ of Information: It is the policy of the County to acquire right of way whenever possible through development to meet the ultimate road width as shown on the County Thoroughfare Plan. The dedication of this parcel conforms to that plan, and will decrease the right of way costs for road improvements when constructed. District: Bermuda Attachments: Yes ~_~No Title: Riqht of Way Manager VICINITY SKETCH ACCEPTANCE OF A PARCEL OF LAND ALONG THE WEST RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF BERMUDA ORCHARD LANE FROM SAMUEL E. SMELLY ANt) VIRGINIA W. SMELLY RIVER II Bapt isLA~O Exit- 15 \ PRE$~WOHIA FAF~S. Memorial Park ount easant Bapt Co 6 CHARLES E, WOOD CPIN: 8156497,.766 N E 11,716 LINE LI L2 LINE TABLE DISTANCE BEARING S 82'57'47" E 10.50 S 80~7°46' E 10.06 0.101 ACRES SAMUEL E. AND VIRGINIA W. SMELLY GPIN: 8146499831 DB. 1792 PG. 111 13630 BERMUDA ORCHARD LANE SEC TION 2 I N 82'~7'47" ~'''~-- B. 81, PG. 1214,, w 226~.06, LOT I / \ I \ THORNHILL / / \ SECTION i \ P. EI. 71, PG. lOO / \ LOT I I \ I \ / \ I THORNHILL \ / SECTION I \ / i LOT 2 \ II GORDON H, AND MARY JO BENNETT GPIN: 8166485176 DB. 2253 PG. 1545 ,859. 5589 1 I, 716,625, 0244 PLAT SHOWING 0.101 ACRES OF LAND TO BE DEDICA TED TO THE COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BERMUDA DISTRICT ,,~ CHESTERFIELD COUNTY, VIRGINIA TIMMON$ ENGINEERS * ARCHITECTS * SURVEYORS GALE. CHK.: PREVIOUS JOB NO. PRINCE GEORGE OFFICE ~ 4411 CROSSINGS BLVD. GEORGE. VIRGINIA 25875-1455 (804) 458-8685. FAX (804) 751-0798 emoil:-- http://www. Ummons.com - !DATE: 01-17-00 SCALE: 1%100' DRAWN B~ AWE CHECKED B~WMN JOB NO.: 18417 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Meeting Date: March 15, 2000 Item Number: 8.B.9.c. Subject: Acceptance of a Parcel of Land along the North Right of Way Line of Willis Road and West Right of Way Line of Pams Avenue from Sanmukh H. Patel and Rameschandra R. Patel County_ Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: ~ Board Action Requested: Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors accept the conveyance of a parcel of land containing 0.119 acres along the north right of way line of Willis Road (State Route 613) and the west right of way line of Pams Avenue {State Route 626) from Sanmukh H. Patel and Rameschandra R. Patel, and authorize the County Administrator to execute the necessary deed. Summary of Information: It is the policy of the County to acquire right of way whenever possible through development to meet the ultimate road width as shown on the County Thoroughfare Plan. The dedication of this parcel conforms to that plan, and will decrease the right of way costs for road improvements when constructed. District: Bermuda John W. Harmon Attachments: Yes No Title: Riqht of Way Manager 141 VICINITY SKETCH ACCEPTANCE OF A PARCEL OF LAND ALONG THE NORTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF WILLIS ROAD AND WEST RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF PAMS AVENUE FROM SANMUKH H. PATEL AND RAMESCHANDRA R. PATEL EFENSE CORNER BdI I IOLII)A¥ P/U(K ,7 JAMES W. & CAROLYN W. BATTLE DB 1964 PG 67..]. PIN No. 794-671-1448 9020 PAMS AVENUE PIPE/F N74'59'24" E 253.33' N74'59'24"E 10.12' OWNER: SANMUKH H. PATEL DB 3611 PO 71`3 PIN No. 794-671-28,31 2400 WILLIS RD VARIABLE WIDTH R-O-W DEDICATION AREA = 0.119 ACS. N74'54'53" E -~ 238.28' S74'54'53"W WILLIS ROAD (ST. RTE. 61,3) (VAR. WIDTH R/W) 3671207.410 11794193.960 246.92' 5671269.424 11794424.030 S15'48'30"W._.J 15.72' 25 0 50 1 ~)0 ORAPHIC SCALE: 1" = 50' SCALE 1" = 50' JN 3285ROW PLAT OF 0.119 ACRE PARCEL OF LAND TO BE DEDICATED TO THE COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD LOCATED IN THE BERMUDA DISTRICT, CHESTERFIELD COUNTY, VIRGINIA GENE ~/A?SON & ASSOC/A?ES, 4221 BONNIE BANK ROAD RICHMOND VIRGINIA 804-271-8058 DATE: 11-30-99 ~-,_E: ~ cwM-3~ ogRsw X43 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Meeting Date: March 15, 2000 Item Number: ~ Subject: Acceptance of a Parcel of Land Along the East Right of Way Line of Turner Road from New Life Outreach International County_ Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors accept the conveyance of a parcel of land containing 0.064 acres along the east right of way line of Turner Road (State Route 650) from New Life Outreach International, and authorize the County Administrator to execute the necessary deed. Summary of Information: It is the policy of the County to acquire right of way whenever possible through development to meet the ultimate road width as shown on the County Thoroughfare Plan. The dedication of this parcel conforms to that plan, and will decrease the right of way costs for road improvements when constructed. District: Clover Hill Preparer'~h~. 7~a~~ Attachments: Yes No Title: Riqht of Way Manager # 144 VICINITY SKETCH ACCEPTANCE OF A PARCEL OF LAND ALONG THE EAST RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF TURNER ROAD FROM NEW LIFE OUTREACH INTERNATIONAL Spring N8~'1 10.01' IdO~ IWl OF ~IRGINIAI ~ (a=,~N 7S3 7O2 ~ ~ 15' WA'rER ESMT. 1OOO1=034,5 349 De ~35 PO 7 AREA OF DEDICATION TO CHESTERFIELD COUNTY 5926.11 SF (0.064- Ac.) 1027 1033 NEW UFE OUTREACH INTERNA'IIONAL DB 2656 PO 428 GPIN 763 7O2 4989 GPIN 763 7O2 496,3 GPIN 763 702 5354 GPIN 763 702 5145 R-5696.58 Lm227.75 Ton-,113.89 ~.2'17'27' C-,227.74 CHD-S04'52'35~ 1.96' 100 PLAT SHOWING A 0,064 AC, PARCEL FOR DEDICATION ACROSS THE PROPERTY OF NEW LIFE OUTREACH INTERNATIONAL Ct. OVER HILL DISTRICT CHESTERFIELD COUNTY, VIRGINIA L-227.27 Tm-113.65 ~-2'17'27" 0-227.26 CHB-SO4'52'35'E & P.VK]~L 29-I 1100 1~3 205 763 702 1421 3702390.013 E N//F DAW<~3N, HOWA]~) & ~ TAX PARC~. 29-5-(1)-14 DB 656 PG 323 GPIN 763 702 2917 ( m I,'ggT ) inch- 1o0 ft. PROJ[CT~ 99O2O6 CARL E. DUNCAN, ENGINEER ,/ SURVEYOR lg39 CAPEWAY ROAD POWHATAN, ~R~NIA 2313g (804) 598-8240 .DATE: DECEMBER 15, 19991SCALE: 1" = 100' DRAWN BY: KAH CHECKED BY:_ CED JOR NO.: CHESTERFIELD COUNTY _ BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page ~ of ~ Date:. March__~l 5 2000 Item Number: ~L0_~. Subject: County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: c~9 Approval of a Request from Dove Homes, Inc. for an Exception to the Use of Public Wastewater for a Proposed Residential Structure Located at 4410 Tweedsmuir Road Adjacent to the Beckenham Subdivision ! .l ~'. i,~ Board Action Requested: Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors approve Dove Homes, Inc.'s request for an exception to the use of public wastewater. Summary of Information: On February 15, 2000, staff received a letter from Dove Homes, Inc. representing the property owner Bernard Coleman requesting an exception to the use of public wastewater for a proposed home to be located at 4410 Tweedsmuir Road. Under Section 18-61 of the Chesterfield County Code, the Board of Supervisors may grant an exception to the requirement to use public wastewater when a new residential structure requires an onsite wastewater service line of more than 500 feet. The proposed residence will be located such that the onsite wastewater service line will be greater than 500 feet, thereby, qualifying this situation as an exception to the use of public wastewater. District: Matoaca Preparer: Title: Assistant Director Attachments: Yes]INo February 15, 2000 Mr. Craig Bryant Director of Utllttle~ 6710 West Kreuae Road Chesterfield, VA 23832 Dear Mr. Bryant: I am the current owner of the property located at 4410 Twee~l~mulr Ro~, Beekenham Subdivision. I approve of Mr Sandy Haymes requesting an exception to the sewer hookup because of file distance. He has written a contract to purchase this lot from me subject to an approved 4 bedroom septic system, Sincerely, Bernard Coleman 149 FEB-15-2000 11:52 794 7825 ' P.02 4501 2 6427 4418 3 4410 4 8 4427 7 8217 4419 5 9547 ; 6 ,' 9t28 4411 4403 lO 9411 4412 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Meeting Date: March 15, 2000 Item Number: 8.B.10.b. Subject: Request to Install a Private Water Service Within a Private Easement to Serve Property at 13730 Lawing Drive County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors approve a request to install a private water service to serve property at 13730 Lawing Drive and authorize the County Administrator to execute the water connection agreement. Summary of Information: Floyd E. Ragsdale and Connie L. Ragsdale have requested approval to install a private water service within a private easement to serve property at 13730 Lawing Drive. This request has been reviewed and staff recommends approval. District: Bermuda Preparer.~~ ~. ~ J~hn W. Harmon Attachments: Yes No Title: Riqht of Way Manaqer VICINITY SKETCH REQUEST TO INSTALL A PRIVATE WATER SERVICE WITHIN A PRIVATE EASEMENT TO SERVE PROPERTY AT 13730 LAWING DRIVE Mount Minnis Memorial Park HUNGRED ,WALTHALI RUFFIN Fill, L EST: RD WAL'I"HALL PARK CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Meeting Date: March 15, 2000 Item Number: 8.B. 10.c. Subject: Request Permission for Underground Cable to Encroach Within a Sixteen Foot Sewer Easement Across Lot 5, Block E, Beaver Point Subdivision County_ Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors grant Bell Atlantic-Virginia, Inc., permission for underground cable to encroach within 16' sewer easement across Lot 5, Block E, Beaver Point Subdivision; subject to the execution of a license agreement. Summary_ of Information: Bell Atlantic-Virginia, Inc., has requested permission for underground cable to encroach within a 16' sewer easement across Lot 5, Block E, Beaver Point Subdivision. This request has been reviewed by staff and approval is recommended. District: Clover Hill ~hn W. Harmon Attachments: Yes No Title: Riqht of Way Manager # !54 VICINITY SKETCH REQUEST PERMISSION FOR UNDERGROUND CABLE TO ENCROACH WITHIN A SIXTEEN FOOT SEWER EASEMENT ACROSS LOT 5, BLOCK E, BEAVER POINT SUBDIVISION BELL ATLANTIC-VIRGINIA~ INC. GLADSTONE D-TEL Job # __,,~&,~) B, A. Job # ¢~0,~5'"" SHEET ~---~__OF 3 BELL ATLANTIC - VIRGINIA, INC. COUNTY PREPARED BY :~fl/~/~/ CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Meeting Date: March 15, 2000 Item Number: 8.B.11.a. Subject: Award of Construction Contract for County Project #99-0161 Spreading Oak Water Line Rehabilitation County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: c~j Board Action Requested: Staff requests that the Board of Supervisors award the construction contract to Gerald K. Moody T/A Southern Construction Company in the amount of $88,433.95 and authorize the County Administrator to execute the necessary documents. Summary of Information: The project consists of replacement of approximately 743 L.F. of 6" water line and all associated appurtenances in Spreading Oak as shown on the attached map. The new system will provide improved fire protection and! reliability. Staff received three (3) bids ranging from $88,433.95 to $144,730.00. Thc lowest bid was in the amount of $88,433.95 by Gerald K. Moody T/A Southerr Construction Company. The County's engineering consultant, Draper Aden Associates, evaluated the bids and recommends award of the contract to Gerald K. Moody T/A Southern Construction Company. Funds for this project are available in the current C.I.P. Preparer: ~title: Assistant Director of Utilities Attachments: Yes ~----~No SPREADING OAK WATER LINE REHABILITATION COUNTY PROJECT #99-0161 SPREADING OAK CT. SPREADING OAK RD. PROJECT SITE TH£ OAKS SUBOI~qSION VICINITY SKETCH NOT TO SCALE CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Meeting Date: March 15, 2000 Item Number: 8.B.11.b. Subject: Award of Construction Contract for County Project %99-0160 Holly Glen Water Line Rehabilitation Co-nty Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Staff requests that the Board of Supervisors award the construction contract to Gerald K. Moody T/A Southern Construction Company in the amount of $55,406.70 and authorize the County Administrator to execute the necessary documents. Summary of Information: The project consists of replacement of approximately 553 L.P. of 6" and 303 L.F. of 4" water line and all associated appurtenances in Holly Glen as shown on the attached map. The new system will provide improved fire protection and reliability. Staff received three (3) bids ranging from $55,406.70 to $77,756.00. The lowest bid was in the amount of $55,406.70 by Gerald K. Moody T/A Southern Construction Company. The County's engineering consultant, Draper Aden Associates, evaluated the bids and recommends award of the contract to Gerald K. Moody T/A Southern Construction Company. Funds for this project are available in the current C.I.P. Preparer: Roy E. Covin~on, P.E. Attachments: Yes ~--~No ~Title: Assistant Director of Utilities HOLLY GLEN WATER LINE REHABILITATION COUNTY PROJECT #99-0160 PROJECT GARDENGATE · VICINITY SKETCH NOT TO SCALE CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of. 1 Meeting Date: March 15, 2000 Item Number: 8.B.12. Subject: Conveyance of an Easement to Bell Atlantic-Virginia, Inc. County_ Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Authorize the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors and the County Administrator to execute an easement agreement with Bell Atlantic-Virginia, Inc. to install underground fiber optic cable on County property at the Salem Church School Complex to provide service for the new Emergency 911 System. Summary_ of Information: Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors authorize the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors and the County Administrator to execute an easement agreement with Bell Atlantic-Virginia, Inc. to install underground fiber optic cable on County property at the Salem Church School Complex to provide service for the new Emergency 911 System. District: Dale ~ohn W. Harmon Attachments: YesI ]No Title: Riqht of Way Manaqer 161 VICINITY SKETCH CONVEYANCE OF AN EASEMENT TO BELL ATLANTIC-VIRGINIA, INC. o'=C URT;4OUqE ROAD / <~oo..,,-,X.~ /' ~ / i VARIOUS OSTFRBIND ~ ' ! - ~ FAMZLY MEMBERS Denotes CL of 15' Wide Bell Atlantic-Virginia, Inc. Easement Hereby Granted NO RTH COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD SALEM CHURCH ELEMENTARy & MIDDLE SCHOOL COMPLEX G.P.LN. 777-665-1:229-00000- (9600 Salem Church Road, Chesterfieb. I. ['.'41 Existing 25' Chesterfield Cmmty N/F 1 Sewer Easement COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD ] 'F~IRGROUNI~ PROPERTY~ ~ Denotes CL of 15' Wide f' 1~11 Atl~nfie-Virgirfia, Inc. -'--"--"'~__,.o.~ ' -~--...~'%~ ,,~ / (CL u mzocro~, '-"'--- ~- -- :a- o ~ .O~L~ f Cmmly Sewer Easement) ~.,~ \ ×~ "'<.~ / // BELL ATLANTIC EASEME~Nq' C, / X ~..~ ~ . . \ .&>..5%% - D-tel TELECOMMUNICATIONS, INC. a821 BE'I-flLEHEM ROAD RICHMOND, VA 23230 (804) 213-3815 Prepared £or BeE Adandc- Virg4m'a, lac. DISTRICT: DALE B/A .1OB NO: KCO-3557 DATE: 2/10/00 (REVISED a/I/OD) R/W PERMIT NO: BC-101354-R PLAT SHOWING BELL ATLANTIC-VIRGINIA, INC. EASEMENT UPON THE PROPERTY OF COUNTY OF CHES~ERF~LD known as the SALEM CHURCH EL~_MRNTAR Y 8r, MIDDLE SCHOOL COMPLEX TAX MAP PARCEL NO. {G.P. LN.} 777-66,~-1229-00000 (9~0~ Sa/em Clmrch Road, COUNTY: CHESTERFIELD WIRE CENTER: CHESTER PREPARED BY: D-TEL/SHB AREA/TAX DIST': 83000/2199 STATE: VIRGINIA D-TEL.108 NO: 4699 SCALE: 1" = 400' SHEET ~ OF 3_..__~. .,}: .... DENOTES CENTERI rNE OF FIFTEEN FOOT (1._~5') WIDE BELL ATLANT/C-VLRGINIA, INC. EASEMENT. CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Meeting Date: March 15, 2000 Item Number: 8.B.13. Subject: Request to Quitclaim a Portion of a Sixteen Foot Sewer Easement Across the Property of Genito Partnership I County_ Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors authorize the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors and the County Administrator to execute a quitclaim deed to vacate a portion of a 16' sewer easement across the property of Genito Partnership I, a Virginia General Partnership. Summary_ of Information: Genito Partnership I, a Virginia General Partnership has requested the quitclaim of a portion of a 16' sewer easement across its property as shown on the attached plat. Staff has reviewed the request and recommends approval. District: Clover Hill Attachments: Yes --~No Title: Right of Way Manaqer 164 VICINITY SKETCH REQUEST TO QUITCLAIM A PORTION OF A SIXTEEN FOOT SEWER EASEMENT ACROSS THE PROPERTY OF GENITO PARTNERSHIP I LINE TABLE LI S78'52'52"W 10.26' L2 NO1 '45'10"E 13. 99' L3 S01'45'10"W 11.47' L4 S78'52'52"W 10,26' L5 NO1'dS'10"E 26,40' L6 S01'45'10"W 2.~.96' L 7 S87'08'09"E 6. 00' VAR, FffDTH R/W N~'~ ' zi. R=2011,15" R=2011,15' L=IO. O0' L---IO. O0' ~=0077'06" A=00"17'06" T=5.00' T=5,00' 10' WIDE Chd=S 86'54'28" E Chd=S 87'21'49" E SANITAR.Y SEWER EASEMENT ~ ~ Chd=lO. O0' Chd=lO. O0° ~'~ ! L7 / ~'E 11732052.22 ' ~ ~~2~1~:'' u' -../~ _0 EXISE 10' TEMPORARY EASEMENT ~ L ~ ~ L N ~'~',~[,~Z~c~ DB; ~695 P~t814 ~ EA SEMEN T ~ ~ ~ ~ GENITO PARTNERSHIP I ~ ~ DB: 212~ PG: 1112 TAX ID. NO.' 7~2687~969 15401 GENITO ROAD PLA T SHOWING A 10' WIDE SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT & A 10' WIDE TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT TO BE DEDICATED & A PORTION OF AN EXISTING SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT TO BE VACATED ACROSS THE PROPERTY OF GENI TO PAR TNERSHIP I CLOVER HILL D/STRICT ,,-, CHESTERFIELD CO., VIRGINIA COUNTY PROJECT NO.: 98- 0025 40 0 20 40 80 ~II~ . GRAPHIC SCALE I INCH = 40 FEET SURVEYORS * ENGINEERS * PLANNERS CORPORATE HEADQUARTERS N. COURTHOUSE ROAD' V1RCINIA 23236-409c. 794-,3500 , FAX: DATE: 1-14-2000 SCALE: 1"=40' DRAWN BY; M.S.F. CHECKED BY: JOB NO.: 64434 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Meeting Date: March 15, 2000 Item Number: s.n. 14. Subject: initiate an Application for a Mobile Home Permit for 5749 Cogbill Road, Richmond, VA 23234. County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: That the Board of Supervisors Richmond, VA 23234. Summary of information: initiate an Application for a Mobile Home Permit at 5749 Cogbill Road, Mr. Miller, Dale District Supervisor, requests that the Board of Supervisors initiate an application for a mobile home permit on behalf ofBrandon C. Inscoe. During Hurricane Floyd on September, 1999, Ms. Inscoe's home was destroyed beyond repair. A very large tree fell into the middle of the house, destroying the house and much of the contents. She was working out of her home, so she has been unemployed for 6 months. She will receive $9,700 from the Federal Emergency Management Agency to replace her home, but this amount will not be enough to replace a house. Preparer: Attachments: The fee for this mobile home permit would have been $545.00. Lynda F. Price Yes No Title: Emergency Services Coordinator , 1(;7 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 1 of 1 AGENDA Meeting Date: March 15, 2000 Item Number: 8.~.~. Subject: Cancellation of May 24, 2000 Public Hearing to Consider Amendments to County Code § 19-159 Relating to Residential, Multifamily and Townhouse Uses in C-3, C-4 and C-5 Districts. County Administrator's Comme_n~ts~ _,,~ County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Cancel May 24, 2000 Public Hearing to consider amendments to County Code § 19-159 relating to residential multifamily and townhouse uses in C-3, C-4 and C-5 districts. Summary of Information: At its February 23, 2000 meeting, the Board set a public hearing for May 24, 2000 to consider amendments to County Code §19-159 and to reenact those amendments with an effective date of June 21, 2000. The purpose of this action was to allow a developer who received a ruling from the Board of Zoning Appeals permitting a multifamily development to vest his right to construct that development before the new ordinance became effective. The Board previously established an effective date for the ordinance of February 1, 2000 based on staffs' representation that, once the developer had submitted his site plan to the County, his fight to develop would vest. Since that action, a question has arisen whether the site plan must actually be approved, rather than merely be filed, to give the developer vested rights. In light of this issue, the Board was asked to consider extending the effective date of the new ordinance to provide additional time for the developer' s site plan to be approved. At this time, however, the County Administrator has decided that, since the developer and the Board were originally told that vesting occurred when the site plan was filed, and since the site plan was filed prior to the current effective date of February 1, 2000, there is no need to consider further revisions to the effective date of the new ordinance and the developer's project will be considered tc have vested. In light of this history, the Board is requested to cancel the May 24, 2000 public hearing and to direct the Planning Commir~fi~on that it is no longer required to consider the proposed ordinance amendment. P reparel~""~ '~~ Title: Dire ct or of Planning "'~- Thomas E. f~obson Attachments: DYes .No l# [ 0422:48556.1 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page _1 of 1 Meetin~Date: March 15, 2000 Item Number: 10.A. Report On: Developer Water and Sewer Contracts Background: The Board of Supervisors has authorized the County Administrator to execute water and/or sewer contracts between the County and the Developer where there are no County funds involved. The report is submitted to the Board members as information. Summary of Information: The following water and sewer contracts were executed by the County Administrator: Contract Number: Project Name: Developer: Contractor: Contract Amount: District: County Administrator: Attachments: 98-0393 Market Square Elderly Housing at Winchester Greens Market Square Elderly Housing LP Godsey & Son Incorporated Water Improvements - Wastewater Improvements Bermuda Prepared By: /L~/J. E ~.?eck, ~r. Yes No $16,504.00 (Private) CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Meeting Date: March 15, 2000 Item Number: 10.B. Su~ect: Status of General Fund Balance, Reserve for Future District Improvement Fund, and Lease Purchases County Administrator's Commen~: Capital Projects, County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Summary of Information: Lane B. Ramsey Attachments: Yes ~] No County Administrator :1.69 BOARD MEETING DATE 07/01/99 11/23/99 11/23/99 11/23/99 11/23/99 11/23/99 12/15/99 11/23/99 12/15/99 11/23/99 12/15/99 11/23/99 12/15/99 11/23/99 12/15/99 11/23/99 12/15/99 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY GENERAL FUND BALANCE March 9, 2000 DESCRIPTION FY2000 Actual Beginning Fund Balance Designate excess revenue (County) for non- recurring items in FY2001 Designate expenditure savings (County) for non-recurring items in FY2001 Designate excess revenue (Schools) for non- recurring items in FY2001 Designate excess revenue (Schools) for non- recurring items in FY2001 Designate expenditure savings (Schools) for non-recurring items in FY2001 Reappropriation of FY99 County Results of Operations for Police Reappropriation of FY99 County Results of Operations for Parks and Recreation Reappropriation of FY99 County Results of Operations for Libraries Reappropriation of FY99 County Results of Operations for Fire Reappropriation of FY99 County Results of Operations for Presidential Primary Reappropriation of FY99 County Results of Operations for Economic Development Incentives AMOUNT (1,653,055) (793,967) (94,422) (470,514) (1,940,408) (540,800) (280,000) (135,000) (342,000) (lo6,ooo) (75O,OOO) BALANCE $36,694,598 35,041,543 34,247,576 34,153,154 33,682,640 31,742,232 31,201,432 30,921,432 30,786,432 30,444,432 30,338,432 29,588,432 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY GENERAL FUND BALANCE March 9, 2000 11/23/99 12/15/99 Reappropriation of FY99 County Results of Operations for Relocations in Administration Building (100,000) 29,488,432 06/30/00 FY00 Budgeted Addition to Fund Balance 1,246,900 30,735,332 171 Board Meeting Date CHESTERFIELD COUNTY RESEKVE FOR FUTURE CAPITAL PROJE(~i'S TRADITIONALLY FUNDED BY DEBT March 9, 2000 Description Amount Balance FOR FISCAL YEAR 2000 BEGINNING JULY 1, 1999 04/28/1999 FY2000 Budgeted Addition 8,034,500 8,650,602 04/28/1999 FY2000 Capital Projects (7,120,900) 1,529,702 08/25/1999 Transfer to LaPrade Library Project for construction (150,000) 1,379,702 09/17/1999 12/15/1999 02/23/2000 Partial Release of designation for Henricus Land Purchase based on final grant award Transfer to Circuit Court Project for construction of courtrooms/chambers/parking lot. Transfer to Coalboro Road Extended Project for construction in conjunction with Vulcan Materials Company 104,425 (300,000) (35O,00O) 1,484,127 1,184,127 834,127 DISTRICT IMPROVEMENT FUNDS March 9, 2000 District Prior Years FY2000 Carry, Over ApDroDriation Funds Used Balance Bermuda $19,428 $38,500 $33,663 Clover Hill 108,410 38,500 71,971 Dale 41,494 38,500 46,718 Matoaca 53,542 38,500 36,298 Midlothian 100,906 38,500 83,105 County Wide 0 13,500 0 24,265.72 74,938.41 33,275.42 55,744.47 56,301.20 13,500.00 Prepared by Accounting Department February 29, 2000 Date Began 12/88 Description SCHEDULF~ OF CAPITALIZED LEASE PURCHASES APPROVED ANDEXECUTED Airport State Police Hangar Additions County War~house Total * 12~93 Real Property Lease/ Purchase 04/99 Public Facility Lease Juvenile Courts Project Original Amount $128,800 3,31,200 460,000 17,510,000 16,100,000 Date Ends 12/00 12/01 11/19 Outstanding Balanc~ 02/,29/00 $15,019 38,619 53,638 4,835,000 16,100,000 TOTAL APPROVED AND EXECUTED $34,150,649 PENDiNG EXECUTION None *Second Refunding of Certificates of Participation, Series 1985 _'tVa Vleeting Date: March 15, 2000 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1___ of ~ Item Number: 14.A. Subject: Resolution Recognizing Mr. Jay B. Lafler County_ Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Adoption of attached Resolution $ommary_ of Information: Mr. Warren has requested that the attached resolution be adopted. This resolution is in recognition of Mr. Lafler's dedication and support of our youth and of Economic Development through various programs, and for his leadership and commitment throughout the region. ~) ~- ~ ~iTitle: Preparerr//~-//,~~ ~~~ ~" Attachments: Yes ~ No Director, Public Affairs xvsl RECOGNIZING MR. JAY B. LAFLER FOR HIS PARTICIPATION IN AND SUPPORT OF COUNTY AND COMMUNITY INITIATIVES WHEREAS, Mr. Jay B. Lafler has been a resident of Chesterfield County for eleven years and served for six years as the manager of Cloverleaf Mall; and WHEREAS, Hr. Lafler brought "SAFE PLACE," a national program for at- risk youth, to Virginia, and funded it for three years; and WHEREAS, Mr. Lafler was involved with the Cloverleaf School Cash Program, which awarded more than $70,000 to Chesterfield County Schools over the past seven years, and was also involved in the successful "Class Room on the Mall" program; and WHEREAS, Mr. Lafler currently serves as president of the Gateway Business Association; and WHEREAS, Mr. Lafler was an active member of the "Shop Chesterfield" Committee; and WHEREAS, Mr. Lafler was instrumental in bringing the Community Policing Office to Cloverleaf Mall and also lent his support as a sponsor of Chesterfield County's 250th anniversary celebration; and WHEREAS, Mr. Lafler provided space for safe post-prom parties for numerous high schools throughout the County; and WHEREAS, Mr. Lafler has actively participated in Chesterfield County Revenue Forums; Police Block Grant studies; as well as surveys related to the improvement of the Eastern Midlothian corridor; and WHEREAS, Mr. Lafler was the sponsor and creator of the first area- wide "Disability Awareness Resource and Job Fair" in conjunction with Chesterfield County Schools; and WHEREAS, in these and other endeavors, Mr. Lafler has consistently demonstrated outstanding citizenship, civic leadership and a conunitment to caring for his community, and especially for its youth. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors hereby publicly recognizes Mr. Jay B. Lafler, expresses appreciation for his numerous efforts on behalf of the betterment of Chesterfield County and the region, and wishes him well in his new endeavors as Vice President, Commercial Properties Management. AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that a copy of this resolution be presented to Mr. Lafler and that this resolution be permanently recorded among the papers of this Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County Virginia. ' CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Meeting Date: March 15, 2000 Item Number: 14.B. Subject: Resolution Recognizing Dr. Wayne Virag for His Service on the Committee on the Future County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Adoption of attached resolution Summary of Information: Dr. Wayne Virag, representing the Bermuda District, has resigned from the Committee on the Future following years of active and dedicated service. Preparer: ~;k~(,F)i\ {L~ ' Ma'h'fftr' yn/~. dole Title: Assistant County Administrator Attachments: Yes [-~ No l# O( RECOGNIZING DR. WAYNE F. VtRAG FOR HIS SERVICE ON THE COMMITTEE ON THE FUTURE WHEREAS, the Chesterfield County Committee on the Future was established in 1987 by the Board of Supervisors and the County Charter for the purpose of assessing the future and long range challenges which the County will face, advising the Board of Supervisors, and making recommendations to lessen any adverse effect on the County of future changes; and WHEREAS, Dr. Wayne F. Virag was appointed as a member of the Committee in 1992 and has served the citizens of the Bermuda District with distinction for the past eight years; and WHEREAS, Dr. Virag assisted the Committee with the preparation of the County's "Economic Development" strategic plan in 1993 which made specific recommendations in the areas of strengthening the County's workforce, planning for growth and development, and preparing for the residents' needs and their impact on economic development; and WHEREAS, Dr. Virag assisted the Committee with creating the "Neighborhood Preservation" report in 1995 which developed strategies to strengthen County communities by offering recommendations related to community organizations, neighborhood schools, community safety, crime prevention, and the maintenance, rehabilitation, and design of public and private facilities; and WHEREAS, Dr. Virag assisted the Committee with the preparation of the "Youth Development~ report in 1999 which creates recommendations to maximize the opportunity for Chesterfield County youth to become engaged contributors within their communities through community, church, and private organizations, voluntarism and school involvement; and WHEREAS, Dr. Virag has dedicated countless hours to the Committee during the past eight years. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors publicly recognizes Dr. Wayne F. Virag and expresses appreciation for his dedication and outstanding service to the Committee on the Future and to the citizens of Chesterfield County. AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that a copy of this resolution be presented to Dr. Virag and that this resolution be permanently recorded among the papers of this Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County, Virginia. CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Meeting Date: March 15, 2000 Item Number: 14.C. Su~ect: Resolution Recognizing March as Chesterfield County Foreign Language Month County Administrator's Commen~: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Adoption of attached Resolution Summary of Information: Mr. Warren requested that the attached Resolution be adopted. The resolution recognizes the importance of foreign language study in preparing our students to be productive citizens in our global economy. Lisa H. Elko Attachments: Ycs Title: Clerk to the Board RECOGNIZING MARCH 2000 AS "FOREIGN LANGUAGE MONTH" WHEREAS, foreign language skills are vital if the United States is to maintain its competitive status in the world marketplace of goods, ideas, and ideals; and WHEREAS, Chesterfield County recognizes that language advances the cause of understanding, ensures the preservation of culture, and allows us to express both our unity and our diversity and that by learning the languages of others, we broaden our vision of the world and our place in it; and WHEREAS, the mission of Chesterfield. County Public Schools is to work with parents and the community to establish and uphold high academic standards for students and to provide effective programs, facilities, and services which assist and support students in achieving success in school and life; and WHEREAS, more than thirteen thousand Chesterfield County secondary students are involved in the study of French, German, Japanese, Latin, Spanish, and American Sign Language and are successful in competing at the local, state, national, and international levels; and WHEREAS, Chesterfield County Public Schools has its own French and Spanish Immersion Centers; International Baccalaureate Program; Superintendent's Foreign Language Ambassador's Program; Certamina; Congr6s Frangais, Dia de EspaSolizacidn; Kosai City, Japan, Study Abroad Program; Mid-Atlantic Junior Classical League Day; and exchange programs which support proficiency in foreign language study, and that while students may not be able to predict which foreign language will be pertinent in their careers, proficiency in one language provides a foundation for proficiency in other languages; and WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors recognizes that the 21st century mandate for foreign language study focuses on preparing our students to be productive citizens in our global economy. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors hereby publicly recognizes the month of March 2000 as "Foreign Language Month" in Chesterfield County. CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Item Number: 14.D. Meetin~l Date: March 15, 2000 Subject: Recognizing Wayne Mason Herndon, Jr. of Troop 891, Sponsored by Bon Air United Methodist Church Upon Attaining Rank of Eagle Scout County Administrator's Comments: County Admin istrator: ~~ Board Action Requested: Adoption of attached resolution Summary of Information: Staff has received a request for the Board to adopt a resolution recognizing Mr. Herndon of Troop 891 upon attaining rank of Eagle Scout. He will be present at the meeting, accompanied by members of his family, to accept the resolution. Midlothian District Wayne Mason Herndon, Jr. Parents: Wayne & Donna Lisa H. Elko Attachments: Title: Yes [~] No Clerk to the Board WHEREAS, the Boy Scouts of America was incorporated by Mr. William D. Boyce on February 8, 1910; and WHEREAS, the Boy Scouts of America was founded to promote citizenship training, personal development, and fitness of individuals; and WHEREAS, after earning at least twenty-one merit badges in a wide variety of fields, serving in a leadership position in a troop, carrying out a service project beneficial to his community, being active in the troop, demonstrating Scout spirit, and living up to the Scout Oath and Law; and WHEREAS, Mr. Wayne Mason Herndon, Jr., Troop 891, sponsored by Bon Air United Methodist Church, has accomplished those high standards of commitment and has reached the long-sought goal of Eagle Scout which is received by less than two percent of those individuals entering the Scouting movement; and WHEREAS, growing through his experiences in Scouting, learning the lessons of responsible citizenship, and priding himself on the great accomplishments of his Country, Mason is indeed a member of a new generation of prepared young citizens of whom we can all be very proud. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors hereby extends its congratulations to Mr. Wayne Mason Herndon, Jr. and acknowledges the good fortune of the County to have such an outstanding young man as one of its citizens. CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 2 Meeting Date: March 15, 2000 Item Number: 16.A. Subject: Public Hearing for Amendments to the Midlothian Area Community Plan, the Route 288 Corridor Plan and the Upper Swift Creek Plan and Related Ordinance Amendments to Reduce Suggested Densities for Residential Development that Generally Drains to Swift Creek Reservoir County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: 1. The Planning Commission and staff recommend approval of amendments to the Upper Swift Creek Watershed Ordinance to include an estimated 1,000 acres that currently are not subject to the 0.22 lb./acre/year watershed standard. (See attached map entitled Upper Swift Creek Watershed - Additional Acreage) The Planning Commission further recommends reduction of planned residential densities, for Land Use Plans within the Upper Swift Creek watershed, to 2.0 units per acre or less. (See attached map entitled Upper Swift Creek Watershed Plan Areas) Summary of information: 1. Additional Land Subject to the Upper Swift Creek Watershed Ordinance The Planning Commission and staff agree that development on an estimated 1,000 acres within the Midlothian Area Community Plan and the Route 288 Corridor Plan, suggested for residential use of up to 2.5 units per acre and not subject to the higher quality standards of the Upper Swift Creek Watershed Ordinance, should be made subject to the 0.22 lb./acre/year standard. In this manner, water quality within the Reservoir would be better protected as residential development occurs in these areas. Preparer: T~mas E. Jacob o~ Title' Director of Plannillg C :DATA/AGENDA/2000/FEB900.4 Attachments: Yes ~No CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 2 of 2 Meeting Date: March 15, 2000 Item Number: Summary of Information: (Continued.) 2. Plan Amendments to Residential Densities within the Upper Swift Creek Watershed The Planning Commission recommends that Comprehensive Plan suggested residential densities, for properties that drain to Swift Creek Reservoir, be reduced (see attached memorandum dated November 1, 1999). Specifically, the Commission feels that this density reduction will bring the Plan into compliance with the water quality standards of the Upper Swift Creek Watershed Ordinance and further bring the Plan into compliance with the residential densities of projects being developed within the watershed. Planning staff, however, does not support these density reductions. Specifically, the water quality performance standards of the Upper Swift Creek Watershed Ordinance must be met by any residential development regulated by the Ordinance, regardless of the density to which a project is built. Therefore, adequate protection of the Reservoir, without the need to further reduce Plan densities, already exists (See attached memorandum dated October 15, 1999). Note: Attached are two versions of the amendment to the Upper Swift Creek Watershed Ordinance, referencing areas subject to the water quality standards of the Ordinance to include the estimated 1,000 acres that currently are not subject to the 0.22 lb./acre/year watershed standard. The first version (Attachment A) should be approved with the adoption of the Comprehensive Plan amendments recommended by the Planning Commission. The second version (Attachment B) should be approved if the Plan amendments are not adopted. Upper Swift Creek Watershed - Additiona Acreages ar-m--ar1 Upper Swift Creek Watershed (approximate boundaries) Land not subject to the 0.22 standard Rt. 288 Corridor Plan approx. 9 ac. approx. 14 ac. approx. 350 ac. Powhatan approx. 560 ac. Midlothian Area Community Plan approx. 123 ac. 5 Upper Swift Creek Watershed approximate boundary (approx. 34,000 acres) [3, Upper Swift Creek Plan 5 Miles Upper Swift Creek '~ ;atershed Plan Arec-~ Upper Swift Creek Watershed (approximate boundaries) Plan Boundaries Rt. 288 Corridor Plan Powhatan Midlothian Area Community Plan 5 Upper Swift Creek Watershed approximate boundary (approx. 34,000 acres) Upper Swift Creek Plan 0 5 Miles BOARD OF SUPERVISORS HARRY G. DANIEL CHAIRMAN DALE DISTRICT ARTHUR S. WARREN VICE CHAIRMAN CLO~/ER HILL DISTRICT J. L. McHALE, III BERIMUDA DISTRICT REMNY BUSH HUMPHREY MATOACA DISTRICT EDWARD B. BARBER MIDLOTHIAN DISTRICT CHESTERFIELD COUNT P.O. Box 40 CHESTERFIELD, VIRGINIA 23832-0040 (804) 748-1050 LANE B. RAMSEY COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR To: From: D ate: Subject: Chesterfield Coumy Plamng Commission/// omas E. Jacobson, Director of Planning J~ November 1, 1999 Amendments to the Midlothian Area Community Plan, the Route 288 Corridor Plan and the Upper Swift Creek Plan relative to suggested densities for residential development within the Upper Swift Creek Watershed. At a work session on August 17, 1999, you instructed the Planning and Enviromental Engineering Departments to review the suggested residential development density of the Upper Swift Creek Plan (2.2 units per acre of less) for compliance with the water quality performance criteria of the Upper Swift Creek Watershed Ordinance. You reviewed staff's f'mdings at your October 19, 1999, work session, then instructed the Planning Department to prepare Plan amendments that, if adopted, would reduce the suggested residential development densities for properties that drain to the Swift Creek Reservoir. Specifically, the following amendments, if adopted, would lower suggested residential densities for the following areas in the following Plans: Midlothian Area Community. Plan - a new the land use category would be created for areas the current Plan suggests are appropriate for 'Low Density Residential 1.01 to 2.5 units per acre', and which also generally drain to Swift Creek Reservoir. This new category would be 'Low Density Residential 1.01 to 2.0 units per acre'; Providing a FIRST CHOICE Community Through Excellence in Public Service. The Plan for Chesterfield The Midlothian Area Community Plan Amendment Proposed LAND USE PLAN The Midlothian Area Community Plan Amendment An amendment to the Midlothian Area Community Plan Prepared by the Chesterfield County Planning Department INTRODUCTION The purpose of this Plan amendment is to lower the suggested densities of residential development for properties that generally drain to Swift Creek Reservoir. GOALS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Refer to the land use categories of the adopted Midlothian Area Community_ Plan and the attached Plan Amendment map. This Plan amendment suggests that a new the land use category be created for areas the current Plan suggests are appropriate for 'Low Density Residential 1.01 to 2.5 units per acre' and which also generally drain to Swift Creek Reservoir. This new category would be 'Low Density Residential 1.01 to 2.0 units per acre'. (Note: The definitions of land use categories in the Midlothian Area Community_ Plan are included on the Plan map rather than in the text of the document. The attached map reflects the addition of the 1.0 to 2.0 units per acre residential category for areas that generally drain to Swift Creek Reservoir.) Refer to the goals and recommendations of the adopted Midlothian Area Community Plan. E E E I ! ! The Plan for Chesterfield The Route 288 Corridor Plan Amendment Proposed The Route 288 Corridor Plan Amendment LAND USE PLAN Refer to the attached amended land use categories for the Route 288 Corridor Plan and the attached Plan Amendment map. An amendment to the Route 288 Corridor Plan Prepared by the Chesterfield County Planning Department INTRODUCTION The purpose of this Plan amendment is to lower the suggested densities of residential development for properties that generally drain to Swift Creek Reservoir. GOALS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Refer to the goals and recommendations of the adopted Route 288 Corridor Plan. This Plan amendment suggests that the land use category for areas the current Plan suggests are appropriate for 'Low Density Residential 1.01 to 2.5 units per acre', and that also generally drain to Swift Creek Reservoir, be amended to 'Low Density Residential 1.01 to 2.0 units per acre'. (Note: The definitions of land use categories in the Route 288 Corridor Plan are provided in Chart 3, Land Use Categories, within the text of the Plan document. The attached text reflects amendment of the 1.0 to 2.5 units per acre residential category, for areas that generally drain to the Swift Creek Reservoir, to 1.0 to 2.0 units per acre. In addition, the attached Plan map reflects the deletion of the 1.0 to 2.5 units per acre residential category for areas that generally drain to the Swift Creek Reservoir. This map now suggests that such areas may be appropriate for residential use of 1.0 to 2.0 units per acre.) 192 Route 288 Corridor Plan Land Use Categories · Residential (One (1) to two ~ (2Y-~) dwellings per acre): Residences, and under certain circumstances, places of worship, public schools, parks and other similar public facilities. 193 Route 288 Co, ridor Plan Amendn, nt Legend -~ Residential (One dwelling or less par acre) R esidential (1 to 2.0 dwellings per acre) Note: ProJects that drain away from the Swift Creek Reservoir may be appropriate for densities of up to 2.5 units par acre, Office/Residential Mixed Use Neighborhood Mixed Use Light Industrial/Flex reek Refer to Midlothian Area Community Plan Refer to Upper Swift Creek Plan Powhi~te/Route 288 Ar6aPlan (Note: All boundaries are be confirmed with the ~ Department.) Note: Consult the Thoroughfare Plan for detailed information about Thoroughfare Plan roads. This map was prepared by the Chesterfield County Planning Department and is an ArcView GIS applicatioon of Chesterfield County GIS base map data. January 24, 2000 jim c:\data~arcviewproj~,uscplan~Jayout2 75,000 The Plan for Chesterfield The Upper Swift Creek Plan Amendment Proposed The 'Upper Swift Creek Plan Amendment An amendment to the Upper Swift Creek Plan Prepared by the Chesterfield County Planning Department INTRODUCTION LAND USE PLAN Refer to the attached land use categories for the adopted Upper Swift Creek Plan and the attached Plan Amendment map. This Plan amendment suggests that the land use category for areas the current Plan suggests are appropriate for 'Single Family Residential: 2.2 Units/Acre or less' would be amended to 'Single Family Residential: 2.0 Units/Acre or less'. The purpose of this Plat[ amendment is to lower the suggested densities of residential development for properties that generally drain to the Swift Creek Reservoir. GOALS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Refer to the goals and recommendations of the adopted Upper Swift Creek Plan. (Note: The definitions of land use categories in the Upper Swift Creek Plan are provided in the Land Use Categories within the text of the Plarl document. The attached text reflects amendment of the 2.2 units per acre or less residential category to 2.0 units per acre or less. The attached Plan map further reflects this amendment.) 195 Upper Swift Creek Plan Land Use Categories · SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL: 2.20 2.__0.0 units per acre or less Appropriate land uses in these areas include conventional single family housing; churches, synagogues; and public schools, parks and other public uses. Uses permitted in circumstances limiting their negative impacts could include private schools, recreation facilities, and day care facilities· Overall residential density should not exceed two c~d .... - ..... h~ units per acre; however, where new development adjoins existing residential development of a lower density, significant transitional areas of intermediate density must be provided. Such transitions should be gradual, and be based upon characteristics of the land involved depending upon the size and type of buffers and street layout. In addition to conventional single family development, innovative development styles would be appropriate in these areas, when included in large coordinated planned developments. Rural villages of clustered houses ranging from 150 to 500 dwelling units are one such possibility. Such villages could integrate townhouses, apartments, or condominiums with clustered detached single family housing. They could also incorporate a Convenience Node - or possibly a Neighborhood Node, depending on the number of dwelling units in the planned community and on adequate access. (See Convenience Nodes below.) Such villages would be internally focused; would center on a community plaza, green, park, or other facility; would provide a continuous network of pedestrian ways; and would be surrounded by open space. Upper Swift ,.,reek Plan Amendrr' nt C) Legend DSingle Family Residential: (1.0 Units/Acre or less) DSingle Family Residential: (2.0 Units/Acre or less) Note: ProJects that drain away from Swift Creek Reservoir may be appropriate for densities of up to 2.2 Units/Acre. Regional Mixed Use I Community Mixed Use Mixed Use Corridor Conservation: Passive Recreation Conservation: Open Water ~ Community Mixed Use Node Regional Mixed Use Node Refer to Old GunlRobious Plan Refer to Refer to Midl°~hian Area com~'dn_jtY Plan Duval Rd. lib I I Refer to POWhite/Rt. 2~s Area Refer to Southem& Western Area Plan ~ (Editor's Note: Sites for Neighborhood Mixed Use and Convenience Nodes are not shown on this map but may be developed under certain conditions. See Plan text for details.) Note: Consult the Thoroughfare Plan for detailed information about Thoroughfare Plan roads. Southern Area Plan (Note: All boundaries are generalized and should be confirmed with the Chesterfield County Planning Department.) This map was prepared by the Chesterfield County Planning Department and is an ArcView GIS application of Chesterfield County GIS base map data January 24, 2000 imc:\data~arcviewproj~uscplan3~layout2 131,313 Attachment A '~ ~ AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE CODE OF THE COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD, 1997, AS AMENDED BY AMENDING AND RE-ENACTING SECTION 19-238 RELATING TO DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County: That Section 19-238 of the Code 0/' the CounWof Chesterfield' _ ' 1997, as amended, is amended and re-enacted to read as follows: Sec. 1%238. Development regulations. .4my use, development or redevelopment of land in the Upper Swift Creek Watershed shall meet the tbllowing performance criteria: (,a) No more land shall be disturbed than is necessary to provide for the desired use or development; (b) Indigenous vegetation shall be preserved to the maximum extent possible consistent with the use or development allowed: (c) Land development shall minimize impervious cover consistent with the use or development allowed; (d) (1) Stormwater runoff shall be controlled to achieve the following: For any new use or development, the post-development, nonpoint-source pollution runoffloads of phosphorous and lead shall not exceed the following: (i) Phosphorus: The post-development total phosphorus load for residential uses located in areas identified in the aerm:wte~ Midlothian Area Community Plan for Low Density Residential (1.01 to 2.0 units per acre), in the Route 288 Corridor Plan for Residential (1 to 2.0 dwellings per acre), and in the Upper Swift Creek Plan for Single Family Residential: (2.0 Units/Acre or less) shall not exceed 0.22 pounds per acre per year. The post-development total phosphorus load for all 2018.468~3.1 (ii) Lead: 1. other uses shall not exceed 0.45 pounds per acre per year. The post-development total lead load for nonresidential uses and residential uses at a density greater than 2.2 2.0 units per acre located in areas identified for such uses in the comprehensive plan shall not exceed 0.19 pounds per acre per year. OOO (2) That this ordinattce shall become effective immediately upon adoption. 2018:46883.1 2 199 Attachment B ~- A AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE CODE OF THE COUNTY OF CI-~STERFIELD, 1997, AS AMENDED BY AMENDING AND RE-ENACTING SECTION 19-238 RELATING TO DEVELOPMI~NT REGULATIONS BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County: VERSION 2 That Section 19-238 of the Code o£ the Coun~ of Chester_field, 1997, as amended, is amended and re-enacted to read as follows: Sec. 19-238. Development regulations. Any use, development or redevelopment of land in the Upper Swirl Creek Watershed shall meet the following performance criteria: (a) (b) No more land shall be disturbed than is necessary to provide for the desired use or development; Indigenous vegetation shall be preserved to the maximum extent possible consistent with the use or development allowed; (c) Land development shall minimize impervious cover consistent with the use or development allowed; (d) (1) Stormwater runoff.shall be controlled to achieve the following: For any new use or development, the post-development, nonpoint-source pollution runoffloads of phosphorous and lead shall not exceed the following: (i) Phosphorus: The post-development total phosphorus load for residential uses located in areas identified in the UUIII[JI UIIUII~IVU plO. il liJl I U~)It. IUIILIO~I LISID I, Jl ~,,L LIIIIL3 [JUl aerem-k~ Midlothian Area Community Plan for Low Density Residential (1.01 to 215 units per acre), in the, Route 288 Corridor Plan for Residential (1 to 2.0 dwellings per acre) and Residential (1 to 2.5 dwellings per acre), and in the Upper Swit~ Creek Plan for Single Family Residential: (2.2 Units/Acre or less) shall not exceed 0.22 pounds per acre per year. WOO (ii) Lead' VERSION 2 The post-development total phosphorus load for all other uses shall not exceed 0.45 pounds per acre per year. The post-development total lead load for nonresidential uses and residential uses at a density greater than 2.2 2.5 units per acre located in areas identified for such uses in the comprehensive plan shall not exceed 0.19 pounds per acre per year. 00o (2) That this ordinance shall become effective immediately upon adoption. 2014:46883.2 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS HARRY G. DANIEL CHAIRMAN DALE DISTRICT ARTHUR S. WARREN VICE CHAIRMAN CLOVER HILL DISTRICT J. L. McHALE, III BERMUDA DISTRICT RENNY BUSH HUMPHREY MATOACA DISTRICT EDWARD B. BARBER MIDLOTHIAN DISTRICT MEMORANDUM CHESTERFIELD COUNTY P.O. Box 40 CHESTERFIELD, VIRGINIA 23832-0040 (804) 748-1050 LANE B. RAMSEY COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR TO: FROM: DATE: Members of the Chesterfield County Planning Commission Thomas Jacobson, Director of Planning /~ ; ~h~ard M~.~, Director of Environmental Engineering October 15, 1999 SUBJECT: Review of residential density for the Upper Swift Creek Plan (2.2 units per acre or less) to determine if residential projects having a density of 2.2 units per acre can comply with Zoning Ordinance water quality performance criteria (the 0.22 standard) for development within the Upper Swift Creek Watershed. Summary Residential projects developed under various actual and hypothetical scenarios can yield densities of 2.2 units per acre or greater and still comply with the 0.22 standard. However, depending on topography and hydrology which influence the amount of pollutant that can be captured within a given project, compliance with the 0.22 standard can make it difficult to achieve residential densities as high as 2.0 or 2.2 units per acre for typical single family residential subdivisions. When this happens, developers of subdivisions typically choose to reduce the subdivision density to the extent needed to achieve compliance. Under the same set of topographic and hydrologic conditions, residential projects that reduce the percentage of impervious area in ratio to the overall area of a project and that further minimize land disturbance (such as cluster and townhouse projects) may achieve a higher density (units per acre) and, at the same time, comply with the 0.22 standard. An overview of Research The following briefly describes current Zoning Ordinance regulations designed to protect the water quality of Swift Creek Reservoir and anticipates how well recently approved residential projects of various densities will comply with the adopted regulations. Also included is a review of how new residenti'al developments, with a density in the range of 2.2 units per acre, can meet the water Providing a FIRST CHOICE community through excellence in public service. quality performance criteria, and a review of how compliance with this criteria is influencing residential development densities for projects in the Upper Swift Creek Watershed. Current Regulations The Zoning Ordinance addresses protection of water quality through the following Divisions of the Countywide Development Standards (Article IV.): Chesapeake Bay Preservation Areas (Division 4); Upper Swift Creek Watershed (Division 5); and Stormwater Management and Best Management Practice Basins (Division 6). The Upper Swift Creek Watershed Ordinance, in particular, requires new development which drains to Swift Creek Reservoir to meet performance criteria designed to protect water quality of the Reservoir. This criteria requires development to: minimize land disturbance; preserve indigenous vegetation; minimize impervious areas; control of stormwater runoff in a manner that limits phosphorous and other pollutants; and provide for the maintenance of best management practices (BMPs) used to achieve the water quality performance criteria. This Ordinance regulates all new residential, office, commercial and industrial development or redevelopment within the Upper Swift Creek Watershed. All new residential developments, located in areas identified by the Comprehensive Plan as appropriate for residential use of 2.2 units per acre or less, have to meet a specified water quality performance criteria (the 0.22 standard) regardless of the number of units per acre that could be developed based on current or future zoning actions, unless exceptions were granted as provided by the Ordinance. This performance criteria applies to all types of residential projects including, but not limited to, single family residential subdivisions, residential townhouse subdivisions, and multi-family and condominium complexes. Assessing the Design Performance of New Developments Relative to Compliance with Upper Swift Creek Watershed Water Quality_ Regulations Environmental Engineering staff reviewed the design of recently proposed and/or approved residential subdivisions located within the Upper Swift Creek Watershed and assessed their compliance with the 0.22 standard. The subdivisions examined included: Cloverhill Estates and Watermill Phase I, (currently under construction); Edgewater at The Reservoir, (recently recorded); Hampton Park Sections Six through Twelve, (parts of a subdivision granted tentative approval); and a possible residential scenario for DH-Spring Run Extension, part of a zoning request proposing a mix of residential, office and commercial uses along Hull Street Road (see Attachments A and B). These subdivisions range in density from 1.52 (Watermill, Phase I) to 2.27 units per acre (Hampton Park, Sections Six through Twelve). Through the subdivision review process, Environmental Engineering staff determined that these developments will comply with the 0.22 standard using on-site BMPs of various designs. Of particular interest was Hampton Park, Sections Six through Twelve. As noted herein, this subdivision achieved compliance with a density of 2.27 units per acre. BMPs for this subdivision include two wet ponds in series which capture runoff from the subdivision as well as runoff from undeveloped off-site areas. Assessing Possible Development Scenarios Relative to Compliance with Upper Swift Creek :80:3 Watershed Water Quali _ty Regulations Planning and Environmental Engineering staff also analyzed hypothetical development scenarios to determine how well various residential types might comply with the 0.22 standard under similar density and/or site characteristics. Planning staff developed four hypothetical scenarios. Three scenarios reflected conventional single family residential subdivisions having development densities of 1.91, 2.0 and 2.2 units per acre respectively. The fourth reflected a townhouse project having a development density of 2.2 units per acre (see Attachment C). For purpose of this analysis, staff assumed identical topographic and hydrologic conditions for all scenarios. Staff's analysis determined that all four hypothetical scenarios could be designed to achieve compliance with the Ordinance. Staff further determined that, under identical site conditions, the townhouse project could achieve compliance more easily than could a single family residential subdivision of conventional lots of the same or even lesser overall density. This ease of compliance was due primarily to a reduced percentage of overall imperviousness and land disturbance resulting from clustering home sites (see Attachments D and E). It should be noted that scenarios using different site criteria could demonstrate a greater or lesser ability to achieve compliance. Assessing the Impact the Upper Swift Creek Watershed Water Quality Regulations have on Residential Densities Many factors can affect the development densities within residential projects. These include, but are not limited to, market demand for residential type and/or lot size and environmental constraints such as wetlands and Resource Protection Areas. However, as noted herein, compliance with the 0.22 standard has been a significant factor in the design and density of new subdivisions in the Upper Swift Creek Watershed. Specifically, this compliance has generated lower development densities as a means of meeting the 0.22 standard. In general, staff has determined that water quality protection measures, such as BMPs, often consume land that could otherwise be used for residential development, having the effect of reducing development density in much the same way that rights-of-way for roads reduce lot yield (density) from yield calculated on a gross density basis. The ultimate density of development is, therefore, influenced as much by the requirement to comply with the 0.22 standard as by either conditions of zoning approval or the Land Use Plan suggested density. In particular, while the Land Use Plan suggested density plays an important role as a guide in zoning and subsequent project layout, it should be noted that the Plan does not factor into the review and approval process of the Environmental Engineering Department for achieving water quality compliance. Attachment A Analysis of five proposed or approved residential projects Compliance with 0.22 lb/ac/yr Water Quali~ requirement Cloverhill Estates 128 lots / 71.9 acres = 1.78 units/ac gross density. The BMP is a single 50 % efficient wetpond. Capture of the entire subdivision provided 75% of pollutant removal needed for compliance. Capture of 131.5 acres of low impervious off-site area provided the rest of the pollutant removal needed. The project is currently under construction. Watermill Phase 1 103 lots / 67.9 acres = 1.52 units/ac gross density. 30.26 ac in lots, 12.41 ac in r/w, 25.23 ac in open space, 3.48 ac in CUPD recreation and retail. Three BMPs are used. A 40 % wetpond, in series with a 65 % wetpond further downstream, and another 65 % wetpond. 50 acres on-site are captured. Only 2 acres of off-site area were available for capture. The project is currently under construction. Edgewater at The Reservoir 32 lots / 17.1 acres = 1.87 units/ac gross density. of future Woolridge Road extension. 1.5 ac in r/w. Includes compliance for 2.0 acres Three BMPs are used. Two marshy bottom dry ponds in series which capture a total of 13.2 acres on-site and 29.7 acres of undeveloped off-site area. An additional dry pond captures 1.6 acres on-site. The project has been recorded. Hampton Park, sections 6 - 12 148 lots / 65.3 acres = 2.27 units/ac gross density. 9.9 acres in r/w, 13.7 ac in open space. (Zoned prior to 2.2 requirement) Two wet the pond (35% and 50%) BMPs in series provide compliance with 0.22 requirement. 60.3 acres on-site area and 125.7 acres of undeveloped off-site area are captured. The on-site area provides 93.6% off the pollutant capture needed for compliance. Sections 6 & 7 are beginning construction. Sections 8 - 12 have received tentative approval. jimc:\data\plans\usc.wpd 7 DFI - Spring Run Extension (Proposed) 11.6 acres of residential and 22 acres of commercial / office, located between Clover Hill High School and the Southshore subdivision. 11.6 acres * 2.2 units/ac = 25 lots. The topography captures half of the roof and most of the parking lot of Clover Hill High School - I= 35%, 15 acres of commercial - I= 70%, and 1.6 acres residential - I= 23 %, to the proposed BMP. The smallest size and efficiency, 35 %, wetpond provides 0.22 compliance for all the residential and 0.45 compliance for all the commercial. The CBLAD manual P-loading factors for existing off-site areas over 20% impervious (I) provide a higher pollutant generation rate than new development. jimc:\dala\plans\usc.wpd 8 206 Attachment B New Residential Projects within the area suggested on the Upper Swift Creek Plan for Residential Use of 2.2 units per acre or less ~ Edgewater Hampton Park Cloverhill Estates DFI-Spri~ng _Watermill -T Run Extension Attachment C Analysis of three hypothetical residential projects Compliance with 0.22 lb/ac/yr Water Quality requirement The following scenarios were provided by Planning and analyzed by Environmental Engineering. Single Family An R-12 subdivision layout on 43 acres. In the absence of topographical information, it was assumed the BMP captured all the onsite and no offsite area. This topography assumption is not representative of actual projects. The site had an RPA and a BMP located in open space. Under this scenario, R-12 zoning setbacks and minimum lot widths reduced the maximum lot yield to 82, or 1.91 units per acre. Townhouse The layout of an actual project with 94 units was used. 43 acres are required to meet the 2.2 units per acre maximum density. 11 acres of the site are developed, not including the BMP easement. It is reasonable to assume capture of the entire impervious area of the site based on the typical grading and storm sewer systems. Corn ~arison Table Type Density # Lots % P Removal Treatment BMP design Imperv. Required (lb/yr) (lb/yr) (effic. & size) SF 2.2 94 23 16.34 16.77 65 % 100'x300' SF 2.0 86 22 15.48 16.21 65 % 99'x297' SF 1.91 82 21 14.62 15.65 65% 97'x291' TH 2.2 94 10 4.73 5.46 50% 49'x146' 20S Attachment E Hypothetical Townhouse Residential 43 acres 94 lots 2.2 units per acre Richmond, Virginia Advert~s~n 9 Affidavit 220806 CHESTERFIEI ~D VA 238324)04~ ~te Ad Size 03/08/2000 12t TAKE NOTI CETAKE NOTICE THAT THE BOARD 2_00 x 20.00 385.60 ATTACH Media General Operations, Publisher of the R~CHMOND T]lClES-D}SPATCH This is to certi~ that the attached 'T~ NOTICETAiKE NOT[C was pubilished by the Richmond Times. Dispatch in the City of Rich~or~d, State of Virginia, on the fo~lowirig dateS: 03/01/2000 03108/2000 The first insertion being g~ven... 03/01/2000 HERE Sworn te and subscribed befere State of Virginia City of Richmond ~y Commission expires Public O3/31/01 E PAY FRO~ iNVOiCE. THANK YOU HiS iS NOT A BILL. PLEAS CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 MeetingDate: March 15, 2000 Item Number: 16.B, Subject: PUBLIC HEARING: Ordinance to Vacate a Portion of a 16' Sewer Easement Across Lot 29, Block A, Cabin Creek, Section B County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors deny the request to vacate a portion of a 16' sewer easement across Lot 29, Block A, Cabin Creek, Section B, shown on the attached plat. Summary of Information: Cheryl O'Neal has submitted an application requesting the vacation of a portion of a 16' sewer easement across Lot 29, Block A, Cabin Creek, Section B. This case was continued from the January 12, 2000 meeting. This request has been reviewed and staff recommends denial because of the proximity of the house to the sewer line. If the easement is vacated the County would be responsible for any damage to the house caused by the excavation of the sewer line. Staff has recommended approval of a license agreement for the house to encroach within the easement but the applicant has declined. District: Dale Attachments: Yes No Title: Riqht of Way Manaqer ,A k VICINITY SKETCH PUBLIC HEARING: ORDINANCE TO VACATE A PORTION OF A 16' SEWER EASEMENT ACROSS LOT 29, BLOCK A, CABIN CREEK, SECTION B EAGLE EAGLE RUN LA ~OC~D A( /! / U7-/ / / ¢-/0"¢~ Mark B. Beall / Date:/-o?. ¢~ '~J Scale:/"=~:::)' Job No.: £~0~._~/ /.JOB ~'0, 2~X.,,O0~ ".~;'~7-/o/~ -,~- 'ID. A T r-/'l~r~ · '/~)O~//~" '~)"~-/"-/bT'- AND ASSOCIATES INC. ° PLANNERS · ARCHITECTS · ENGINEERS · SURVEYORS · 501 Branchwa¥ Road · Suite 100 - Richmond, VinDinia 23236 · 794~)571 · Fax 794-2635 11038 Lakeridoe Parffwa¥ · Suite 1 - Ashland, Virginia 23005 o (804) 550-2888 · Fax (804) 550-2057 REFLI TOMOIRROW CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page I of I Meeting Date: March 15, 2000 Item Number: 16.C. Subject: Public Hearing to Approve Sale of Approximately 2.5 Acres in the Chesterfield County Airport Industrial Park to Airport Investment, L.L.C. and Consideration of Waiver of County's Right to Repurchase Property Contained in the Airport Industrial Park Restrictive Covenants County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: ~ Board Action Requested: Authorize the sale of approximately 2.5 acres in the Chesterfield County Airport Industrial Park to Airport Investment, L.L.C. and waive fight to repurchase property contained in Section 1.2.(a) and (b) of the Airport Industrial Park Restrictive Covenants. Summary_ of Information: Attachments: Airport Investment, L.L.C. is a subsidiary of Avcom which is an electronics manufacturing company that has been located in Chesterfield County since approximately 1980. Through Airport Investment, L.L.C., Avcom recently purchased a facility located at 7730 Whitepine Road in the Airport Industrial Park. Airport Investment, L.L.C. is now interested in acquiring a 2.5 acre parcel located adjacent to their current facility for future expansion. Airport Investment, L.L.C. has agreed to purchase the property for $55,000 per acre. Airport Investment has also requested as a condition to purchasing the property that the County waive the covenant that gives the County the fight to repurchase the property at the originial sales price in the event construction of improvements on the parcel does not commence within six (6) months. Airport Investment plans to construct an expansion of its existing facility on the parcel, but is only in the planning stages of the expansion. Construction is not likely to begin within six (6) months. Staff recommends approving the sale and the waiver. The right to repurchase was placed in the covenants when the Industrial Park was established to prevent speculative purchases. The park is almost completely developed and speculative purchases are not a risk. Moreover, the County still possesses in the covenants a fight to repurchase the parcel if Airport Investment ever wishes to sell the parcel. Preparer:, ~j~ ~ ~)~ Title: Economic Development 0614:48362.1 220806 AD 03/0g/2000 HERE The first insertion being givem.. t~e of Virgkda it'/of RJchmond My Commi.~sion expires 03/31/01 03/0g/2000 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Meetin_q Date: March 15, 2000 Item Number: 16.D. Subject: Public Hearing for Appropriation of up to $750,000 for Comprehensive Services County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Hold a Public Hearing for the appropriation of up to $750,000 for Comprehensive Services Summary of Information: This date and time has been set for a Public Hearing regarding the appropriation of up to $750,000 in additional state funds for Comprehensive Services. The FY2000 budget was set based on state- provided figures that assumed Medicaid reimbursement would provide offsetting revenue to cover both state and local costs. The Medicaid reimbursement contemplated by the State did not materialize because the State was delayed in receiving federal Medicaid certification approval. This item reflects staff projections of an additional $750,000 in state aid to replace the Medicaid funds which could not be drawn down. The locality has maintained its local contribution for Comprehensive Services and funds are available to draw down these state funds. Prepare.. ~~ ~-~ ~~,/~/~.~Ti~tle: Bradford S. Hammer Attachments: ~-~ Yes Deputy, Human Services No ~S~LD BOAPJD OF SL~ER¥TSORS A~ LISA ~XO P O BOX 4O CPi2ESTE~LD YA 23832,-0040 220806 03/08/2000 T~ NOTI NOTICE TF. AT ~ BO~ 2~00 x 11~00 212.08 PubJisher of the RICHMOND T~ES-D~SPATCM 03/01/2000 03/08/2000 AD HERE Sworn to and ~cribed before State of City' of R~chmond ~y Commi~eion e×pires 03/31/01 03/01/2000 MAR-15-2000 13: 45 P. 02 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Meeting Date: March 15, 2000 Item Number: 16. E. Subject: Amendment to § 5-6 of the County Code to Authorize the Removal of Graffiti at Public Expense CounW Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Amend the existing ordinance to permit the County to remove graffiti at public expense. Summary_ of Information: The current ordinance permits the Building Official to repair or remove graffiti on private buildings that is visible from the public right-of-way and to charge the expense to the property owner. At Mr. Barber's request the Board held a public hearing in December to consider amending the County Code to authorize removal of graffiti at public expense. Since then, we have concluded that there is questionable legal authority to charge property owners for the cost of graffiti removal. At its February 9, 2000 meeting, the Board instructed staffto advertise repeal of the existing ordinance and to present to the Board an ordinance that permits the removal of graffiti at public expense. Under the proposed modified ordinance, the existing ordinance would be repealed and the amended ordinance would provide that graffiti will only be removed by the County at County expense in accordance with administrative procedures. (See attached procedures). Henrico and Richmond currently have similar ordinances. Staffalso investigated the possibility of the cost of graffiti removal being covered by normal property owners' insurance policies. Since standard policy deductibles would normally exceed the costs, it is unlikely that insurance would be a viable option. Further, the City Manager of Richmond has agreed to use city resources to remove a number of the existing graffiti sites in Chesterfield County at no expense to the County. Budget Comments: Preparer: , ~? Title: County Attorney Steven L. Micas 1918:48308.1 Attachments: · Yes [] No [# Current Process ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES FOR GRAFFITI NOTIFICATION 1. Investigate complaint to determine if in compliance with County Ordinance. 2. If in violation, a Notice of Violation is prepared giving the owner thirty days to remove graffiti. Notice is mailed to the property owner and posted at the property if necessary. 3. The complainant is contacted and advised of the status of their complaint. 4. Property is reinspected thirty days after the date of the Notice of Violation for compliance. 5. If not in compliance removal contractor is scheduled by the County without further notice to owner. 6. After removal, bill for costs of removal is forwarded to property owner. If owner fails to pay within 90 days, the bill is forwarded to the County Attorney to attach a lien on the property. Proposed Process 1. Investigate complaint to determine if in compliance with County Ordinance. Owner is mailed a letter advising graffiti must be removed within thirty days or it will be removed without the owner's permission. If the owner completes an authorization form, the County will make arrangements to have the graffiti removed as soon as possible, i.e. before thirty days expires, without any cost to the owner. Complainant contacted and advised of status of complaint. If the authorization form is not returned after thirty days, Building Official will determine if funds are available to pay costs of removal and, if so, the County will schedule the graffiti for removal. Upon removal by contractor, the County pays any cost of removal. 1918:48015.1 AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE CODE OF THE COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD, 1997, AS AMENDED, BY AMENDING AND RE-ENACTING SECTION 5-6 RELATING TO THE REPAIR OR REMOVAL OF THE DEFACEMENT OF BUILDINGS, WALLS, FENCES AND OTHER STRUCTURES BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County: (1) That Section 5-6 of the Code o_f the Coun~ o_f ChesterfieM, 1997, as amended, is amended and re-enacted to read as follows: Sec. 5-6. Authority to remove, repair or secure unsafe or defaced structures. (a) The building official may require property owners to remove, repair or secure any building, wall or other structure which is located on their property and which the building official has determined (-i-) poses a danger to public health or safety m-iii) L__ 110,3 ,~ UK;IO.&,,KSIIIKSIIm (b) If the building official determines that a building, wall or structure poses a danger to bli lth fety ---'-- - J -~' ........... '--~ :- --'--"-'- ~ .......... '-':- -'-'-~ -~' ...... h 11 pu c hea or sa , Ltl 11o.3 ~. UWIgJ. L~GIiiGii[, [,llo.[ lO ¥1OlUIIG Ilk/III O. [JLlldll~ ll~ll[.--k/1--FFggy,he s a cause a notice to be served on the owner of the building, wall or other structure, requiring the owner to remove, repair or secure the building, wall or other structure. The property owner shall be served in person unless he cannot be found after a diligent search, in which case the notice shall be sent by registered or certified mail to the owner at his last known address. A copy of the notice shall also be posted in a conspicuous place on the property on which the building, wall or other structure is located. (c) The property owner shall remove, repair or secure the building, wall or structure, as required by the notice, within 30 days (i) after the notice is issued to the owner; (ii) the notice is mailed to the owner; or (iii) the notice is posted; as provided in subsection (b), whichever is later. If the owner fails to take the action required in the notice within the 30-day period, the building official may remove, repair or secure the building, wall or structure, as required by the notice and the costs and expenses of removing, repairing or securing shall be charged to and paid by the owner of the property and may be collected by the county as taxes and levies are collected. (d) Every charge assessed against the property owner pursuant to subsection (c) shall constitute a lien against the property. ~ The building official may also undertake or contract for the repair or removal of a defacement of: (1) any public building, wall, fence or other structure; or (2) any private building, wall, fence or other structure provided that the defacement is visible from a public right-of-way and the property owner fails to remove or repair the defacement within 30 days of the mailing of written notice to the owner's address as shown on the real property records of the county. At the option of the county administrator, the building official may have the defacement removed or repaired by county employees or agents at county expense. (2) That this ordinance shall become effective immediately upon adoption. 1918:47024.1 2 O, Box 85333 Virginia 23:~93-0001 220806 SORS VA 23832~0040 03/08/2000 t21 TAKE NOTICETAKE NOTICE THAT THE BOAR'D 2.00 x 14.00 269.92 ATTACH PubJisher of the 03/01/2000 03/08/2000 The first insertion being given... 03/0 i/2000 ribed before 03/31/O1 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page lo f4 Meeting Date: March 15, 2000 Item Number: 16 .F. ,Subject: Public Hearing to Consider: FY01 through FY06 Secondary Road Six Year Improvement Plan; FY01 Secondary Road Improvement Budget; Chesterfield Road Fund and Surface Transportation Program Fund Project Development Schedules; and Designation of FY01 Chesterfield Road Fund Projects and Transfer of Funds County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: A public hearing to consider the FY01 through FY06 Secondary Road Six Year Improvement Plan, FY01 Secondary Road Improvement Budget, Chesterfield Road Fund and Surface Transportation Program Fund Project Development Schedules, and Designation of FY01 Chesterfield Road Fund Projects and transfer of funds. Summary of Information: FY01 through FY06 Secondary_ Road Six Year Improvement Plan State statutes enable the Board of Supervisors to prepare and adopt, jointly with the Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT), a Six Year Plan identifying improvements that are anticipated to be made to the Secondary Road System in the County. The proposed Six Year Plan includes the same projects approved by the Board in May 1999 with the inclusion of one new state-funded project (Summit Road Extension), and four new federally-funded safety projects requiring a 10% state match. Two of the projects are Highway/Rail Grade Crossing Safety Improvement Projects at Ramblewood Road and Bellwood Road, and two are Hazard Elimination Safety Improvement Projects at Old Buckingham Road at Unison Drive and Hickory Road near Butler Lane. (Continued next page) Preparer: 6~. J.,]?~'~.~c-'L c.,, Title: R.J. McCracken Agen446 Attachments: Yes ~ No Director of Transportation CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 2 of/, Summary_ of Information: (Continued) The anticipated construction date of several projects has been delayed since the previous Plan. The Robious Road project (Route 60 to Woodmont) has been delayed four months. Lakeview Road/Woodpecker Road intersection project and Branders Bridge Road project (Ronte 10 to Happy Hill Road) have been delayed one year. Newbys Bridge Road project (Walmsley Boulevard to Falling Creek) and Newbys Bridge Road project (Falling Creek to Hagood Lane) have been delayed two years. The Plan has been developed based on an average $11.3 million per year allocation ($8.9 million secondary road funds, $1.4 million anticipated Richmond Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) Surface Transportation Program (STP) funds, and $1.0 million Chesterfield Road funds (VDOT/County matching program). The $11.3 million per year allocation is the same annual allocation that was used to develop last year's Six Year Plan. Details of the Six Year Plan are shown on Attachments A through H. The Surreywood Subdivision street paving project located in the Clover Hill District was approved by the Board on May 25, 1999, with the adoption of the FY00-FY05 Six Year Plan. This project was inadvertently omitted from the information submitted to the Board on February 23, 2000, setting the public hearing. Funding for the project will be transferred from another project in the Clover Hill District. FY01 Secondary_ Road Improvement Budget Each year VDOT requests the Board of Supervisors to approve a Secondary Road Improvement Budget. The budget reflects the first year of the proposed Six Year Plan and identifies specific project allocations for the upcoming fiscal year. Attachments I and J identify the projects and allocations for FY01. .Chesterfield Road Fund Project Development Schedule and Designation of FY01 Projects The County regularly participates in an annual VDOT matching fund program (Chesterfield Road Fund), wherein the County provides $500,000 in anticipation of an equal match (dollar-for-dollar basis) by VDOT. The exact amount of funds to.be matched by VDOT is determined by VDOT after all statewide requests for matching funds have been received. Staff will adjust the specific project allocations once VDOT makes its determination. Salem Church Road and Branders Bridge Road are designated to receive funding in FY01. The County Administrator's recommended FY01 budget includes $500,000 for Chesterfield's local match. Funding for projects is provided on a rotational basis among the magisterial districts. The last Chesterfield Road Fund Schedule was approved by the Board in May 1999. The recommended schedule (Attachment G) is a continuation of the currently approved Schedule with additional FY06 funding for the Dale and Bermuda Districts. CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 3 of 4 Summary. of Information: (Continued) ,Surface Transportation Program The Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) is given the authority to select/approve projects to be funded from Regional "STP" Funds. The Richmond MPO receives approximately $10.2 million each year in regional STP funds. Chesterfield anticipates receiving approximately $1.4 million annually in Regional STP funds. The last STP Fund Schedule was approved by the Board in May 1999. Attachment H identifies the recommended STP Fund Project Development Schedule. Recommendation: Staffrecommends the Board: 1) Adopt the attached resolutions approving the FY01 through FY06 Secondary Road Six Year Improvement Plan approving the FY01 Secondary Road Improvement Budget; and Designating Salem Church Road and Branders Bridge Road as the County's FY01 Chesterfield Road Fund Projects; 2) Transfer from the Road Fund Projects Account $378,765 for the Salem Church Road Project, and $121,235 for the Branders Bridge Road Project, subject to Board adoption of the FY01 Appropriation Resolution and after July t, 2000; 3) Approve the FY01 through FY06 Chesterfield Road Fund Project Development Schedule, and the FY01 through FY06 Surface Transportation Program Fund Project Development Schedule; and 4) Authorize the County Administrator to enter into VDOT/County/consultant/contractor, design, right-of-way acquisition, and/or construction agreements, acceptable to the County Attorney, for the projects. District: Countywide CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 4 of 4 Meeting Date: March 15. 2000 Number Budclet and Mana.qement Comments: This request is to hold a public hearing on the FY01 through FY06 Secondary Road Six Year Improvement Plan, the FY01 Secondary Road Improvement Budget, and Chesterfield Road Fund and Surface Transportation Program Fund Project schedules. With the exception of the $500,000 County road match for projects as outlined in Attachment G, all funding is State or Federal. The FY2001--2005 Proposed Capital Improvement Program recommends $500,000 per year to match the State funds for road projects. Preparer: Rebecca T. Dickson Title: Director, Budget & Manaqement WHEREAS, the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors and the Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) have conducted a public hearing on the FY01 through FY06 Secondary Road Six Year Improvement Plan; and WHEREAS, the Board concurs with the proposed projects identified in the Plan. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors approves the FY01 through FY06 Six Year Secondary Road Improvement Plan as presented by VDOT. March 15,2000 WHEREAS, the Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) has submitted its proposed FY01 Secondary Road Improvement Budget to the County; and WHEREAS, the Budget represents the implementation of the first year of the FY01 through FY06 Six Year Improvement Plan adopted by the Board. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors approves the FY01 Secondary Road Improvement Budget as presented bY VDOT. March 15, 2000 WHEREAS, Section 33.1-75 of the Code of Virginia permits the Commonwealth Transportation Board to make an equivalent matching allocation to any county for designation by the governing body of up to 25% or $500,000 whichever is greater of funds received by it during the current fiscal year pursuant to the "State and Local Fiscal Assistance Act of 1972" for use by the Commonwealth Transportation Board to construct, maintain, or improve primary and secondary highway systems within such county; WHEREAS, the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors anticipates appropriating $500,000 for the Chesterfield Road Fund with the adoption of the FY01 Appropriation Resolution; WHEREAS, the Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) has notified the County that $500,000 is the maximum amount of Chesterfield County funds that will be matched by the State during FY01. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors anticipates appropriating $500,000 to be matched by the State for the FY01 Chesterfield Road Fund (Revenue Sharing Program). BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the matched funds shall be allocated to the following projects: $757,530 $242,470 Salem Church Road from Kingsland Road to Beulah Road Preliminary Engineering, Right-of-Way, and Construction ($378,765 VDOT and $378,765 County) Branders Bridge Road from Route 10 to Happy Hill Road Preliminary Engineering, Right-of-Way, and Construction ($121,235 VDOT and $121,235 County) March 15, 2000 INDEX OF ATTACHMENTS FY01 THROUGH FY06 SECONDARY ROAD SIX YEAR IMPROVEMENT PLAN Attachment A Attachment B Attachment C Attachment D Attachment E Attachment F Attachment G Attachment H Annual Revenue Projections - Countywide Incidental ("Routine") Items - Location Map of Projects - Projects by Magisterial District - Anticipated Project Construction Dates - Specific Yearly Allocations - Recommended Chesterfield Road Fund Project Development Schedule - Recommended Surface Transportation Program (STP) Fund Project Development Schedule FY01 SECONDARY ROAD IMPROVEMENT BUDGET Attachment I Attachment J - Location Map of Projects - Specific Project Allocations March 15, 2000 ANNUAL REVENUE PROJECTIONS FUNDING SOURCE ALLOCATION SECONDARY ROAD REGIONAL SURFACE TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM COUNTY ROAD FUND $8.9 MILLION $1.4 MILLION $1.0 MILLION TOTAL $11.3 MILLION March 15, 2000 AVERAGE ANNUAL ALLOCATION COUNTY-WIDE INCIDENTAL ITEMS RURAl, ADDITION TRAFFIC SERVICES, PIPE INSTALLATION, AND ENGINEERING $133,000 $167,000 TOTAL $300,000 March 15, 2000 ATTACHMENT B [ NORTH PROPOSED SECONDARY ROAD SIX YEAR IMPROVEMENT PLAN FY 01 THROUGH FY 06 0.4 OLD BON AIR RD SP 01 ROBIOU8 RD OLD BUCKINGHAM RD 2.3 0.9 SMOKETREE DR/ sP-oo GORDON SCHOOL 8.0 Beyond OLD HUNDRED RD 13.O su-oo GENITO RD 0.6 OLD HUNDRED SU-00 0.5 sP-Ol GENITO ],4 WOOLRIDGE Beyond 0,5 SU-061 ?BAi~.Ey SU-00 ~" ~IUI¥IIVIII RD ],9 F-00 COAL~ORO'-I 1.7 SPRING ~,UN RD F-05 0,3 ~ sp-o4 RIVERWAY RDx, r 0,3 HENSLEY RD '-- ) F-04 2.7 BEYOND SECOND BRANCH RD QUALL~ RD 1.7 F-OO 0.t SU-03 WILDTURKEY RUN NASH RD 1.5 SU-O3 ES LA PROJECT WITHIN 6 YEAR PLAN · · · PROJECT BEYOND 6 YEAR PLAN FOREST HILL AVE/BUFORD RD SU-00 9.2 COURTHOUSE RD COMPLEIE REAMS RD 0.6 BEYOND 15.0 COURTHOUSE RD uc SUBDIVISION 0,2 WALMSLEY BLVD Complete BRIDGE RD KINGSLAND RD ~.5 Beyond DUNDAS RD 0,7 Su-00 BEULAH RD B,6 Beyond SALEM CHURCH RD s~:04] '\ BELLWOOD RD 0.03 SU-O0 RI , 4.3 ~;OMPLETE LORi ~ ~D 0.03 SU-O0 CENTRE ST ].3 SU-00 i" J-- MAROBRITH RD F-03 HICKORY RD BRANDERS BRIDGE RD 4.9 Sp-05 0,6 LAKEVIEW RD Sp-04 LAKEVIEW RD 0,6 Sp-03 0,6 Sp-02 LEGEND Cost in Constmilllons of $ [ ] Multi Jurisdictional ruction Year W - Winter Sp - Spring Su - Summer F - Fall UC-UNDER CONSI'RUCllON I ATTACHMENT PROPOSED SECONDARY ROAD SIX YEAR PROJECTS FY 01 THROUGH FY 06 BY MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT DISTRICT/ PROJECT FROM TO DESCRIPTION ANTICIPATED START CONSTRUCTION BERMUDA DUNDAS RD CENTRE ST * BELLWOOD RD * RAMBLEWOOD DR MAROBRITH RD BRANDERS BRIDGE RD CLOVER HILL ** COURTHOUSE RD WALMSLEY BLVD WALMSLEY BLVD SMOKETREE DR GORDON SCHOOL RD OLD HUNDRED RD SURREYWOOD SUBDIVISION STRATHMORE RD INTERSECTION TURN LANES SUMMER 2000 RTE 10 0.2 MI. N. RTE 10 WIDEN 4 LANE SUMMER 2000 0.39 MI, E. RTE 301 . PJR CROSSING SUMMER 2000 0.4 MI. N. OF BERMUDA HUNDRED RD R/R CROSSING SUMMER 2000 HAPPY HILL RD DEAD END PAVE GRAVEL RD FALL 2003 RTE 10 HAPPY HILL RD WIDEN 2 LANE SPRING 2005 EDENBERRY DR NEWBY~S BRIDGE HOLRIDGE ST GORDON SCHOOL RD SPIREA RD MILLRIDGE PKY GENITO RD RTE 360 GENITO RD SOUTH RIDGE DR " GENITORD WOOLRIDGE RD NEWBYS BRIDGE RD WALMSLEY BLVD ** REAMS RD ADKINS RD DALE HOPKINS RD INCA DR LORI ROAD RELOC RTE 10 WALMSLEY BLVD TURNER RD ** COURTHOUSE RD GENITO RD ** COURTHOUSE RD RTE 288 SALEM CHURCH RD KINGSLAND RD SALEM CHURCH RD CENTRALIA RD SALEM CHURCH RD HUNTINGCREEK DR NEWBYS BRIDGE RD FALLING CREEK BEULAH RD SALEM CHURCH RD KINGSLAND RD AT REEDY CREEK MA?OACA ~ COURTHOUSE RD GENITO RD ** COURTHOUSE RD RTE 288 GENITO RD COURTHOUSE RD NASH RD BEACH RD SUMMIT ROAD EXT 0.55 MI. S. OF BEACH RD NEWB¥S BRIDGE RD QUALLA RD COALBORO RD 0.6 MI. S. WlNTERPOCK RD ** GENITO RD WOOLRIDGE RD BAILEY BRIDGE RD CLAYPOINT RD * HICKORY RD BUTLER LA LAKEVlEW RD WOODPECKER RD RHODES LANE 0.5 MI. S. WOODPECKER RD WILD TURKEY RUN SADDLEBROOK RD LAKEVIEW RD BRANDERS BRIDGE RD RIVERWAY RD BEACH RD NASH RD MORRISETT RD HENSLEY RD SPRING RUN RD BAILEY BRIDGE RD MANCHESTER H.S. SPRING RUN RD MCENNALLY RD WOODLAKE VILLAGE PKY VILLAGE SQUARE PKY QUALLA RD COURTHOUSE RD SECOND BRANCH RD RIVER ROAD OLD HUNDRED RD OTTERDALE RD QUALLA RD CLAYPOINT RD WOOLRIDGE RD TIMBER BLUFF PKY QUALLA RD SPRING RUN RD MIDLOTHIAN COURTHOUSE RD EDENBERRY DR ROBIOUS RD HUGUENOT RD ROBIOUS RD RTE 60 FOREST HILL AVE BUFORD RD FOREST HILL AVE BUFORD RD OLD BON AIR ROAD IRON MILL RD * OLD BUCKINGHAM RD SILVER CREEK CT ROBIOUS RD JAMES RIVER RD REAMS RD ADKINS RD OLD BUCKINGHAM ROAD RTE 60 LUCKS LA WIDEN 4&6 LANE COMPLETE INTERSECTION TURN LANES UNDER CONSTR INTERSECTION TURN LANES UNDER CONSTR YARROW LA SIDEWALK/BIKE LA SPRING 2000 SMOKETREE DR SIDEWALK SPRING 2000 E. BOUNDARY RD SHOULDERS SUMMER 2000 PLANT MIX STREETS SUMMER 2000 SOU~H RIDGE DR WIDEN 4 LANE FALL 2000 FOX CHASE LA WIDEN 4 LANE FALL 2000 INTERSECTION TURN LANES SPRING 2001 FALLING CREEK BR WIDEN 2 LANE FALL 2004 INTERSECTION TURN LANES SPRING 2007 LAUREL OAK RD WIDEN 2 LANE COMPLETE LORI RD NEW 2 LANE COMPLETE INTERSECTION TURN LANES COMPLETE RTE 360 WIDEN 4 LANE UNDER CONSTR GENITO RD WIDEN 4 LANE UNDER CONSTR BEULAH RD WIDEN 2 LANE SPRING 2001 INTERSECTION TURN LANE FALL 2002 INTERSECTION TURN LANES FALL 2005 HAGOOD LA WIDEN 2 LANE FALL 2005 HOPKINS RD WIDEN 2 LANE SPRING 2008 E OF SALEM CHURCH DRAINAGE FALL 2008 RTE 380 WIDEN 4 LANE UNDER CONSTR GENITO RD WIDEN 4 LANE UNDER CONSTR RTE 360 WIDEN 4 LANE UNDER CONSTR MORRISETT RD NEW 2 LANE UNDER CONSTR 0.6 MI. S. OF BEACH RD PAVE GRAVEL ROAD SUMMER 2000 0.5 MI. E. QUALLA RD WIDEN 2 LANE FALL 2000 RIVER RD PAVE GRAVEL RD FALL 2000 INTERSECTION TURN LANES SPRING 2001 MANCHESTER H.S. WIDEN 2 LANE FALL 2001 OLD TOWN CREEK REALIGNMENT SPRING 2002 iNTERSECTION TURN LANES SPRING 2003 0.7 MI. W. SANDYFORD RD PAVE GRAVEL RD SUMMER 2003 0,2 MI. W. TO DEAD END PAVE GRAVEL RD SUMMER 2003 INTERSECTION TURN LANE SPRING 2004 INTERSECTION REALIGNMENT SPRING 2004 HIGHLAND GLEN DR WIDEN 2 LANE FALL 2004 INTERSECTION REALIGNMENT FALL 2004 SPRING RUN RD WIDEN 2 LANE FALL 2005 BAILEY BRIDGE RD REALIGN CURVES FALL 2005 INTERSECTION TURN LANES SUMMER 2006 RTE 288 WIDEN 2 LANE FALL 2006 1.9 MI. S. OF RIVER RD PAVE GRAVEL RD FALL 2007 DRY BRIDGE RD WIDEN 2 LANE SPRING 2008 SPRING RUN RD WIDEN 2 LANE FALL 2008 RESERVOIR WIDEN 2 LANE SPRING 2010 BEACH RD WIDEN 2 LANE FALL 2012 LUCKS LA WIDEN 4&6 LANE COMPLETE SALISBURY RD WIDEN 4 LANE SPRING 2000 WOODMONT DR WIDEN 4 LANE SPRING 2000 INTERSECTION STREET LIGHT SUMMER 2000 INTERSECTION SIDEWALK SUMMER 2000 WATERS MILL RD WIDEN 2 LANE SPRING 2001 OLDE COALMINE RD WIDEN 2 LANE FALL 2003 COUNTY LINE WIDEN 2 LANE SPRING 2005 INTERSECTION TURN LANES SPRING 2007 ALVERSER DR WIDEN 2 LANE FALL 2010 * NIEW PROJECT ADDED TO PLAN ** PROJECT IN MORE THAN ONE DISTRICT COURTHOUSE RD - RT 288 TO GENITO GENITO RD - COURTHOUSE TO RT 360 COURTHOUSE RD - GENITO TO RT :360 NASH RD - BEACH TO MORRISET[ WALMSLEY BLVD / NEVVBy'S BRIDGE I HOLRIDGE INTERS ROBIOUS RD - RT 60 TO WOODMONT SMOKETREE DR / GORDON SCHOOL RD - SPIREA TO,YARROW ROBiOUS RD - HUGUENOT TO SALISBURY OLD HUNDRED RD - MILLRIDGE TO GENII'O COALBORO RD- 0.6 MI. S. WINTERPOCK TO RIVER NEWBY'B BRIDGE RD - QUALLA TO 0.5 MI. E. QUA/LA DUNDAS RD/STRATHMORE RD INTERS GENiTO RD. 360 TO FOX CHASE BELLWOOD RD AND RAMBLEWOOD RD. RR X-lNG REPLACEMENT SURREYWOOD SUBDMSION PLANT MIX FORE.=/HILL I BUFORD RD SIDEWALK & LIGHTS CENTla. E ST - RT 10 TO 0.2 MI. NORTH SUMMIT RD EXT - 0.55 MI. S. OF BEACH TO 0.6 MI. S. BEACH GENITO RD / WOOLRIDGE RD INTERS SALEM CHURCH RD. KINGSI_AND TO BEULAH OLD SON AIR RD - IRON MILL TO WATERS MILL BAILEY BRIDGE RD. CLAYPOINT TO MANCHESTER H.S~ · HICKORY RD - BUTLER TO OLD TOWN CREEK ~RLEM CHURCH RD I CENTRAl. IA INTERS LAKEVIE~V RD I WOODPECKER RD INTERS RHODES LANE - Cl.5 MI. S. WOODPECKER TO 0.5 MI. W. SANDYFORD WILD TURKEY RUN - SADDLEBROOK W. TO DEAD END MAROBRtTH RD - HAPPy HiLL W. TO DEAD END · OLD BUCKINGHAM RD- SILVER CREEK TO OLDE COALMINE RIVERWAY RD I BEACH RD II~/P_J-~ LAKEVlEW RD I BRANDERS BRIDGE RD INTERS NEWBY'S BRIDGE RD - WALMSLEY TO FALLING CREEK NASH RD * MORRi~ ~ t TO 0.3 MI. 8. HIGHLAND GLEN HENSLEY RD I SPRING RUN RD INTERS BRANDERS BRIDGE RD - RT 10 TO HAPPY HILL ROBIOUS RD - JAMES RIVER RD TO POWHATAN CL SPRING RUN RD - MCENNALLY TO BAILEY BRIDGE NEWBYS BRIDGE RD - FALLING CREEK TO HAGOOD SALEM CHURCH RD I HUNTtNC;-;-~REEK OR INTERS BAILEY BRIDGE RD - M~NCHESTER H.$. TO SPRING RUN WOODLAKE VILLAGE PKY I VILLAGE SQUARE INTERS QUALLA RD - COURTHOUSE TO RT 288 REAMS RD I ADKIN S RD INTERS SECOND BRANCH RD - RIVER RD S. TO DEAD END OlD HUNDRED RD - O7 i e:t<OALE TO DRY BRIDGE BEULAH RD - SALEM CHURCH TO HOPKINS QUALLA RD- CLAYPOINT TO SPRING RUN KINGSLAND RD I REEDY CREEK DRAINAGE IUPR WOOLRIDGE RD. TIMBER BLUFF TO RESERVOIR OLD BUCKINGHAM RD. RT 60 TO ALVERSER QUALLA RD - SPRING RUN TO BEACH Project Begin ~ End * NEW PROJECT.aDDED TO PLAN PROPOSED SECONDARYROAD CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE FY 01THROUGH FY06 1 ATrACHMENTE ! t~ [11 0 m 0 0 Z © < m -I ATTACHMENT F ] Z ~ ~ m ~ ~ Oz~ 0 Z Z ~ ~ m o~- 8~- ~- · ~m o~ om ~m ~ ~ ~zm z o > ~ o ~ o Z ooo ~ ~ ggg ~ o ~0 0 mO z ATTACHMENT G ~ z ~ ~ z ~ ~= ~ ~ ~ o ~ z z~ z~ z~ m ffi m~ m~ z mz §~ ~ ~; ~ o 0 mc .~<m mO Z ATTACHMENT H I NORTH PROPOSED FY 01 SECONDARY IMPROVEMENT BUDGET ROAD 0.06 OLD BUCKINGHAM RD 0.08 SMOKETREE DR/ 0.11 GORDON SCHOOL RD GENITO RD 0.13 BAILEY ROBIOUS RD r-" 0.34 Cb'A-Ll~e~,O 0.05 SUMMIT RD, 0.11 NEWBYS BRIDGE RD 0.13 NASH RD FOREST HILL AVE / BUFORD RD 0.19 COURTHOUSE RD 0.25 WALMSLEY BLVD 0.40 NEVVBYS BRIDGE RD 0.03 DUNDAS RD 0.08 SALEM CHURCH RD 1.26 BELLWOOD RD 0.003 RE /' 0.24 ~-~' / / ,.. '--~ / , ~ __~--' - "-~.LAKEVIEW RD 0.09 ~ HICKORY RD 0.05 0.27 RHODES LA PROJECTS WITH FY 01 ALLOCATIONS COST IN MILLIONS $ I ATTACHMENT I I PROPOSED FY 01 SECONDARY ROAD IMPROVEMENT BUDGET PROJECT FROM TO DESCRIPTION ALLOCATION COUNTY WIDE ITEMS COURTHOUSE RD HOPKINS RD WALMSLEY BLVD NASH RD SMOKETREE DR GORDON SCHOOL RD ROBIOUS RD ROBIOUS RD * RAMBLEWOOD DR FOREST HILL AVE DUNDAS RD * BELLWOOD RD * SUMMIT RD NEWBYS BRIDGE RD GENITO RD COALBORO RD GENITO RD SALEM CHURCH RD BAILEY BRIDGE RD * HICKORY RD SALEM CHURCH RD LAKEVIEW RD RHODES LANE * OLD BUCKINGHAM RD NEWBYS BRIDGE RD VARIOUS LOCATIONS EDENBERRY DR INCA DR TURNER RD BEACH RD GORDON SCHOOL RD SPIREA RD HUGUENOT RD RTE 60 0.4 MI. N. OF BERMUDA BUFORD RD STRATHMORE RD 0.39 MI. E. RTE 30t 0.55 MI. S. BEACH RD QUALLA RD RTE 360 0.6MI. S. WINTERPOCK SOUTH RIDGE DR KINGSLAND RD CLAYPOINT RD BUTLER LA CENTRALIA RD WOODPECKER RD 0.5 MI. S. WOODPECKER RD SILVER CREEK CT WALMSLEY BLVD * NEW PROJECT ADDED TO PLAN LUCKS LA LAUREL OAK RD INTERSECTION MORRISETT RD YARROW LA SMOKETREE DR SALISBURY RD WOODMONT DR HUNDRED RD INTERSECTION INTERSECTION 0.60 MI. S. BEACH RD 0.5 MI. E. QUALLA RD SOUTH RIDGE DR RIVER RD FOX CHASE LA BEULAH RD MANCHESTER H.S. OLD TOWN CREEK INTERSECTION INTERSECTION 0.7 MI. W. SANDYFORD RD OLDE COALMINE RD FALLING CREEK BR MISC WIDEN 4&6 LANE WIDEN 2 LANE TURN LANES NEW 2 LANE SIDEWALK/BIKE LA SIDEWALK WIDEN 4 LANE WIDEN 4 LANE RJR CROSSING SIDEWALK TURN LANES RJR CROSSING PAVE GRAVEL RD WIDEN 2 LANE WIDEN 4 LANE PAVE GRAVEL RD WIDEN 4 LANE WIDEN 2 LANE WIDEN 2 LANE REALIGNMENT TURN LANE TURN LANES PAVE GRAVEL RD WIDEN 2 LANE WIDEN 2 LANE TOTAL $247,134 $248,OOO $240,859 $400,000 $129,000 $83,725 $113,947 $326,384 $352,641 $3,0OO $188,318 $82,000 $3,000 $50 000 $112 000 $2,547 691 $343 544 $1,542 000 $1,255 844 $130 000 $50 000 $1C 000 $94 338 $26[ 456 $5~ 000 $33~000 $8,907,881 FYO1BUD 2-3-00 ATTACHMENT J Wednesday, March 8, 2000 00 brush fn'es ablaze on Sumatra TIlE ~qSOCIATED PRESS "The level o[ air pollution in Pc- countries in the region, In nearby kanbaru is dangerous," said Teuku Singapore, the haze whitened the Alan'isyah, a local government offi- usually blue sky, and the odor of ~, ~ -- As many cial. "It is hazardous and could cause burning wood was detectable in ~0 brash fires raged out of con- lung infections and other health parrs of the island nation. )n Sumatra yesterday, reducing .,.~ ,, Firefighters are not equipped to , ,, . Alamsyah said. dark gray dund hung low .over ~,iinreatened ~e health of millions o[ Many of the fires are in remote lo- to reach them. Firefighters were mbaru, capital of Pdan pro,anci~ pebble over much of Southeast Asia, cations, and firefighters are unable entral Sumatra forcing people to . ... indoors and p~mpting the' gov- This year. ~ri,/oke and haze ~aave also hampered by a lack of equip- one truck that had to be r6peatedly refilled with water. Officials at Singapore's Center for Remote Imagqng and Processing, who have been monitoring the fires via satellite imagery, said there were up to 500 independent fires through- out Sumatra. "The situation is very alarming at the moment," said the center's di- rector Lira Hock. "The co~cer~, is that the wind will change darect!on. Once the southwest monsoon kicks Public Notice The Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors and the Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) will jointly hold a pub- lie hearing on Wednesday, March 15, 2000 at 7 p.m. to update the Six Year Secondary Road Construction Plan for Chester- field County for the period 2000-01 through 2005-06 and to approve the 2000-01 Fiscal Year Budget for secondary road construction. The public heating will be held in the Board of Supervisors' meeting room at the Chesterfield County Main Administration Building at Route 10 and Loft Road. interested citizens may present comments regarding ~e update and ~e budget. Both are available at the VDOT Chesterfield Resi- dency, located at 3301 Specks Drive off Route 360. The tele- phone number is 804-674-2800. TTY users may cab 1-800- 307-4630. tatted blowing across other merit -- many companies had only in, it will blow this way.!' neat to kand out face masks. .. akeaflY S, __--~ IGE', BUY NOW, MENT 'TIL.JULY' CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Meeting Date: March 15, 2000 Item Number: 18. Su~ect: Adjournment and Notice of Next Scheduled Meeting of the Board of Supervisors County Administrator's Commen~: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Summary of Information: Motion of adjournment and notice of next scheduled meeting on March 20, 2000 at 7:30 p.m. at the School Board Administration Building for the Chesterfield County Council of PTAs/PTSAs meeting. Preparer: '~~~ ~ Title: Lisa H. Elko Attachments: [---~ Yes No Clerk to the Board #