Loading...
84S172November 28, 1984 BS REQUEST ANALYSIS AND RECOMMENDATION 84S172 C.F. Currin, Jr. Matoaca Magisterial District West line of Iron Bridge Road REQUEST: Conditional Use Planned Development to permit use exceptions in a Residential (R-7) District. RECOMMENDATION Recommend approval for the following reasons: The proposed Conditional use Planned Development is compatible with adjacent zoning and land uses. Through the Conditional Use Planned Development process, the Commis- sion and Board may impose conditions which minimize the impact of commercial development along Route 10 and preclude the possibility of typical strip development. CONDITIONS The following conditions notwithstanding, the plan prepared by Charles C. Townes and Associates, dated 5/18/84, shall be considered the Master Plan. (P) Parcels A, B and C shall be limited to Convenience Business (B-i) uses plus a motor vehicle accessory store and a printing shop and shall comply with the bulk requirements of the Convenience Business (B-i) District, except where otherwise stated herein. (P) Bm Parcels D and E shall be limited to General Business (B-3) and Light Industrial (M-I) uses and shall comply with the bulk requirements of the General Business (B-3) District, except where otherwise stated herein. (?) e Buildings shall be constructed of materials other than cinder block or metal. The specific design and colors shall be approved by the Planning Commission in conjunction with schematic plan review. (P) In conjunction with schematic plan review, a site landscaping plan shall be submitted to the Planning Commission for approval. Plants shall consist of ornamental trees and shrubs. (P) Except directional signs which shall be governed by Zoning Ordinance requirements, one (1) freestanding sign shall be permitted identify- ing this development and the tenants therein. This sign shall not exceed an aggregate area of 100 square feet and a height of ten (10) feet. Individual freestanding buildings shall be permitted building-mounted signs not to exceed an aggregate area of 0.5 square feet for each one foot of building frontage. Business signs may be illuminated, but shall not be luminous. Prior to erection of any signs, a sign package depicting typical colors, materials and styles shall be submitted to the Planning Commission for approval. (P) Additional pavement and curb and gutter shall be constructed along Route 10, as deemed necessary by VDH&T and the Transportation Department. (T) The sixty (60) foot right of way, shown on the Master Plan, shall be eliminated. Access to this development shall be confined to a sin- gle private entrance/exit located =~ the gsuthcrm property linc~ This access shall be designed to allow shared use with future devel- opment to the south. Internal private driveways shall be designed to facilitate vehicular movements between the individual parcels and between the parcels and the existing eighty (80) foot right of way to the north. In conjunction with the first schematic plan submis- sion, a plan for the overall development shall be submitted to the Transportation Department for approval reflecting this condition. This condition may be modified by the Planning Commission at the time of schematic plan review. (T&CPC) The developer shall be responsible for installing additional pave- ment and curb and gutter along the entire property frontage adjacent to the eighty (80) foot right of way to provide a typical section of forty (40) feet, face of curb to face of curb. (T) 10. Curb and gutter shall be installed around the perimeter of all driveways and parking areas. (EE) 11. Prior to obtaining a building permit, a Master Drainage Plan for the entire 11.8 acres shall be approved by Environmental Engineering. (EE) GENERAL INFORMATION Location: West line of Iron Bridge Road, 2,000 feet north of Lewis Road. Tax Map 114-1 (1) Part of Parcel 1 (Sheet 31). Existing Zoning: R-7 Size: 11.8 acres Existing Land Use: Vacant 84S172/BSOCT4/PN Adjacent Zonin~ & Land Use: Utilities: Environmental Engineering: Fire Service: General Plan: Transportation: North - R-7 with Conditional Use Planned Development and Special Exceptions; Offices and public/semi-public (County water tank) South - A; Vacant East - A and B-1 with Conditional Use Planned Development; Vacant West - R-7; Public/semi-public (Southern Area Landfill) 30 inch water line located along Route 10. Use of public water intended. Lies in Swift Creek sewage drainage area. Public sewer not available and extension is not economically feasible. Intends to install individual septic tank and drain- field systems. Private systems must be approved by County Health Department. Drains to Swift Creek. No existing on- or off-site drainage and/or erosion problems. Adequate drainage outfall must be provided in accordance with GC-7 of the Virginia Erosion and Sediment Control Handbook. May be necessary to obtain off-site drainage easements. Concrete curb and gutter should be in- stalled around the perimeter of all drive- ways and parking areas (Condition 9). Mas- ter Drainage Plan should be prepared and approved prior to release of any building permits. (Condition 10) Chester Fire Station, Company #1. At pre- sent, fire service capability adequate. Water flows and fire hydrants must be provided in compliance with nationally rec- ognized standards. Industrial The Master Plan proposes construction of a public road between Parcels A and B. This public road will serve only development of the request parcel and not future area development. The existing public road net- work in the area provides adequate access to the request parcel; therefore, there is no need for public road dedication. Staff recommends that this development be served 3 84S172/BSOCT4/PN by private driveways. The location of the private drive should be confined to the southern property line and designed to allow shared use with future development to the south. Further, internal private drives should be designed to facilitate traffic movements between parcels and to the existing 80 foot right of way which serve the Southern Area Landfill (Condition 8). Additional pavement and curb and gut- ter should be constructed along Route 10 to accommodate turning movements. (Condition ?) DISCUSSION This Conditional Use Planned Development is to permit a commercial/ industrial complex. Parcels A, B and C, containing 3.5 acres, are pro- posed for Convenience Business (B-l) uses and two Community Business (B-2) uses (i.e., motor vehicle accessory store and printing shop) (Con- dition 2). These parcels are located along, or in close proximity to, Route 10. Parcels D and E, containing 8.3 acres, are located on the western portion of the property adjacent to the County's Southern Area Landfill and water tank. These parcels are proposed for General Business (B-3) and Light Industrial (M-I) uses. (Condition 3) Property to the north is zoned Residential (R-7) with a Conditional Use Planned Development and is occupied by professional offices or is being developed as a convenience store. The proposed commercial uses are, therefore, compatible with approved land uses to the north. As pre- viously noted, the Southern Area Landfill and County water tank are located to the west and north. The more intense B-3 and M-1 uses would be located adjacent to these facilities. If conditions are imposed which control the appearance of buildings (Condition 4), require site landscap- ing (Condition 5) and minimize the amount of freestanding signs (Condi- tion 6), the possibility of typical strip commercial development along Route 10 will be minimized and approval of this request would be consis- tent with the Commission's and Board's past actions on property to the north. CASE HISTORY Planning Commission Meeting (10/16/84): The applicant accepted the conditions on pages 1 and 2, with the excep- tion of Condition 8. The applicant indicated that relocation of the access as recommended by Staff would adversely affect the marketing of the property. 84S172/BSOCT4/PN Staff agreed to amend Condition 8 to allow the Commission to modify the condition at the time of schematic plan review when the specific uses are known. On motion of Mr. Belcher, seconded by Mr. O'Connor, the Commission resolved to recommend approval of this request subject to the conditions on pages 1 and 2. AYES: Messrs. Miller, Cowan, O'Connor and Belcher. ABSENT: Messrs. Thomas and Dodd. The Board of Supervisors on Wednesday, November 28, 1984, beginning at 2:00 p.m., will take under consideration this request. 5 84S172/BSOCT4/PN · LANDFILL 84SI72 C.U. PD. SH. 31 ,A v M M A Z CO OF CHESTERFIELD rri wEST HUNDRED ROAD - STATE: ROUTE # I0