Loading...
1987-02-25 PacketCHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA MEETING DATE: February 25, 1987 ITEM NUMBER: SUB4ECT: Richmond Renaissance Project XXI Presentation Yon. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION Mr. Brenton S. Halsey, Chairman of Richmond Renaissance, and others will be present. PREPARED BY:, ATTACHMENTS: YES [] NO ~x SIGNATURE: ~/O[J'NTY ADMINISTRATOR RICHMOND XXI PROJECT Prepared For Richmond Renaissance TABLE OF CONTENTS II. III. I . INTRODUCTION EXECUTIVE SUMMARY SUMMARY OF THE IMAGE FOUNDATION IV. THE PROCESS--NEXT STEPS V. INTERVIEW RESULTS RICHMOND XXI PROJECT I. INTRODUCTION The objective of the RICHMOND XXI PROJECT is to focus the major growth and city enhancement opportunities of Richmond through an image and theme program which will spearhead business growth, city enrichment and broadening of the tax base. The image and theme package will provide a rallying point for the community, and more importantly, will provide the key promotion and development groups in Richmond a vehicle, or common platform from which to tell Richmond's story. Through this program, promo- tional efforts in Richmond will become more consistent, more highly visible and more effective. Identifying the various alternatives and suggestions which will assure the greatest likelihood of success for the program has been a major aspect of the research phase of RICHMOND XXI. Their merit, as well as their priority rankings and complex inter-relationships are examined in this summary report. Sixty-six persons selected by Richmond Renaissance have been interviewed for this project by Glenn Monigle and Associates, Inc. Persons interviewed included: concerned private citizens, historians, members of the business community, the financial industry, law, public and private education, the arts and sciences, real estate, journalism, lodging, food and government. This summary report will present strategic recommenda- tions, as well as overall evaluation of key data gathered in the interviews and research conducted by Glenn Monigle and Associates, Inc. Richmond X~I Page 2 II, EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The following communications strategy is recommended to effectively achieve the long range goals of the RICHMOND XXI PROJECT: Utilization of the following three (3) primary OBJECTIVES for all promotional and developmental activities: Objectives Attraction of First and Second Tier Corporations While Maintaining Present Ones Convention Business Tourism These three primary elements which comprise the focus of the image and theme program are relatively equal in importance to one another. Additionally, they provide logical interrelationships to one another, as well as the necessary flexibility to serve as long-range and short-range OBJECTIVES. This program, in its most basic terms, is selling Rich- mond "as a place" for commerce, as opposed to focusing upon any single feature or attraction. Richmond--THE PLACE--offers a bountiful array of activities, opportunities and alternatives which are appealing to the business sector, the convention business and tourism, in general. Richmond XXI Page 3 '" THE IMAGE FOUNDATION (Promotable Features) are assets which are structured to meet the overall OBJECTIVES from their role as major support mechanisms: The Image Foundation I Strategic Geographic Proximity General Quality of Life Present BuSiness Environment James River Developments Cultural Amenity Package Natural and Architectural Beauty Historic Heritage Through interviewing and research, these seven (7) assets which comprise the IMAGE FOUNDATION have been identified as the vehicles/mechanisms to be utilized in the majority of promotional efforts. In Section III, a summary of the key ingredients within each of these promotable features is presented. Richmond XXI Page 4 '" Though not listed specifically as a "Promotable Feature", the role of the numerous PARTNERSHIPS in Richmond is viewed as crucial to the overall image and theme program. The various socio-economic, multi- racial and cross-cultural partnerships, agencies and special interest groups in Richmond have demonstrated their ability to direct the city into progressive, well-planned thought and action. The SYNERGIES of these groups must be directed into a unified effort which has the total city as their focus. To a large degree, these partnerships will serve as major rallying points for the population. Their ability to tell the "same story"--with the same overall goals in mind--will have a great bearing on the likelihood of success of the project. AMENITY ASSETS are the attributes of Richmond which require additional strengthening to support the attainment of the OBJECTIVES and to supplement the IMAGE FOUNDATION: Amenity Assets il Downtown Nightlife Transportation Signage and I I i Downtown Retailing I Synergy of Local Partnerships and Agencies Convention Center Visitors Center River Development Programs Perceptions and Promotion of Public Education II ~ Regional Government , i Cooperation Richmond XXI Page 5 -' III. SUMMARY OF THE IMAGE FOUNDATION (Promotable Features) Richmond lends itself to the American ideals of family, commerce and the pursuit of happiness in many ways. Richmond's location, access and array of educational and cultural activities make it a great place for conducting business or visiting (either through the convention business or tourism): Ae GEOGRAPHIC PROXIMITY for Richmond to the major population centers and commercial markets is excellent. Within a 500 mile radius (one day drive or an approximate i hour air flight) is: 50% of U.S. population 55% of U.S. manufacturing activity 60% of U.S. corporate headquarters These statistics demonstrate Richmond's attractive- ness as a center or hub for business and commerce on a national and regional basis. Equally impor- tant are the potentials for Richmond in promoting itself as a hub city for conventions and tourism. Many prominent U.S. historical locations, the Atlantic beaches, Blue Ridge Mountains and a nationally prominent amusement park are all within an easy 2-hour drive by car. The existing and planned lodging and convention facilities are positive aspects for Richmond's promotional efforts: Washington, D.C. Williamsburg Jamestown Blue Ridge Parkway Virginia Beach Yorktown Mount Vernon Kings Dominion 100 miles 51 miles 60 miles 95 miles 107 miles 64 miles g6 miles 25 miles Richmond XXI Page 6 -- GENERAL QUALITY OF LIFE in Richmond is represented by the following information: - Cost of living lower than U.S. average - Excellent climate Educational system is well balanced. 9 local colleges and 30 colleges within 150 miles Health care facilities/services are nationally recognized - Tax rate low compared to U.S. and S.E. region - Parks and recreation system is well developed Cultural activities are numerous - museums, historical sites, galleries, symphony, ballet, theater, opera, concerts, sports and libraries Though Richmonders often tend to take their quality of life for granted, the opinion leaders inter- viewed supported the data obtained from research which shows that this community is well-balanced, culturally strong and an increasingly progressive place to live and work. The quality of life is hard to pin-point in any community, but these key points are important to a business or a family con- sidering Richmond as a "new" home--or as a place to CONTINUE to call home. LOCAL BUSINESS AND COMMERCE is generally stable, well-balanced and diverse enough to withstand many of the economic issues confronting many other cities of its size, as well as those considerably larger: Diversity of non-agricultural industries are represented by these statistics: Retai 1/Whol esal e Government Services Manufacturing Fi nance/Insurance Transport at i on/Communi cations Construction 25% 21% 19% 16% 8 6% 5% .l Richmond XXI Page 7 Other important factors in retaining existing business and commerce, as well as in attracting relocations: - 4.3% unemployment rate is below U.S. average - Northern~most "Right to Work" state - 90% of work force is non-union Unemployment Insurance and Workers Compensation is lower than U.S. average, as well as Georgia, Kentucky, Maryland, Tennessee, North Carolina and South Carolina Higher percentage of skilled white collar professionals than U.S. and South Atlantic averages Commercial center of Virginia for: finance, insurance, manufacturing, distribution and government HISTORIC HERITAGE is a major promotional aspect to be utilized in propelling Richmond into the next century. With few exceptions, Richmond is nearly unrivaled in its availability and access to important American historical sites, shrines and museums: State Capital Building (Capital of Virginia since 1789) George Washington Statue in Rotunda of Capital Building St. John's Church - John Marshall House - Edgar Allen Poe Museum - Kanawha Canal area Museum of the Confederacy (Capital of the Confederacy during Civil War) - Richmond National Battlefield Park - Monument Avenue - Virginia Historic Landmarks Commission Richmond XXI Page - Virginia Historical Society at Battle Abbey - Valentine Museum - Hanover Court House - Plantation Area along Lower James River - Hollywood Cemetery - Virginia House - Black History Museum Many other historically significant locations from Colonial and Civil War eras The sense of pride in American History which Rich- monders express is strong, and can be further developed through consistent, well-managed pro- motional programs for tourism and the convention business (a natural off-shoot into tourism). Communicating the pride of heritage is a strong promotional tool which can be used progressively and not in some effort to remain locked into the past. Historic Heritage is a viable tool in cul- tivating Richmond's future. THE JANES RIVER is unquestionably Richmond's most visible "single" feature. Research and the interviews ranked it as a high priority feature for promotional purposes and development, but not as the focus of OBJECTIVES for the achievement of the project's goals. Various improvements underway on or near the James River include: White water rapids which are acclaimed nationally James River Park (Belle Isle and Southshore area, Pony Pasture Wetlands, Hugenot Woods Section) James River Discovery Program. (Canal Walk from the Capital to the river/ Brown's Island redevelopment/ Tredegar Street improvements/ Bell Isle developments, bridges and the Environmental Center) River rides through the plantation area along the Lower James River Richmond XXI Page 9 Other possible river related developments and improvements could include: - Penitentiary Site redevelopment - Southshore Area (owned by Overnite) redevelopment - Old Pump House (Byrd Park) refurbishing - North Bank Park improvements - Limited revitalization of commercial fishing, as well as re-introduction of new fish species to the river environment. The CULTURAL AMENITY PACKAGE available in Richmond is excellent, and provides numerous options and opportunities to citizens, conventioneers, tourists and the business community in general. - Numerous art galleries - The Virginia Museum - V.C.U. Arts Department & Performing Artists Series - Carpenter Center for the Performing Arts - Virginia Repertory Theater Group - Theater 4 and the Children's Theater - Richmond Ballet and Concert Ballet of Virginia - Richmond Symphony and Sinfonia - School of Richmond Ballet - Virginia Opera Association performances - Dogwood Dell - Carillon - The Empire Theater - The Barksdale (Hanover) - Swift Creek Mill Playhouse (Chesterfield) Richmond XXI Page 10 The Children's Theater of Richmond School for the Performing Arts in the Richmond Community (SPARC) Richmond Chorale Over 80 libraries in Richmond representing public branches, collegiate, special interest, corporate and state Festival of Arts Series summer performances (since 1956) sponsored by the Department of Recreation and Parks and the Business League Facilities for the public include: - Richmond Coliseum - Convention Center - University of Richmond (City) Stadium - City Arena - The Mosque - The Diamond (baseball) NATURAL AND ARCHITECTURAL BEAUTY in Richmond is abundant. The diversity in the architectural composition in Richmond blends with the climatic conditions to create a livable location steeped in tradition, yet open to progressive trends in modern architecture and construction: Natural: - Over 11,000 acres of city parks in Richmond - The James River - Naturally lush vegetation throughout the entire area Architectural: - Mixture of representative architectural movements dating from the Colonial to Civil War Period (in residential and commercial use) - European-styled architecture is well-represented Richmond XXI Page 11 ..~ - Diversity in architectural styles of the Richmond skyline including the James Center complex, several banking facilities, several new hotels and many other commercial developments - Restoration of numerous historically significant buildings, streets and neighborhoods - Overall blending of Old Richmond and New Richmond Page 12 IV. THE PROCESS--NEXT STEPS Following adoption of the Strategic Recommendations, the following steps are suggested in beginning the process of image and theme development: 1. Gaining the support and consensus of the key public and private agencies, partnerships and groups currently participating in various development and promotion of Richmond: The specific groups to be brought into play are numerous, but might include: Central Richmond Association, Downtown Presents, Richmond Renais- sance, ConTour, Richmond-On-The-James, Historic Richmond Preservation, Arts Council of Richmond, Department of Recreation and Parks, Richmond Publishing (both newspapers), Metropolitan Economic Development Council (MEDEC), Metropolitan Chamber of Commerce, Richmond Public Schools, the higher education community, State Tourism Board, State Industrial Commission, representatives from all historic sites/shrines/museums, and numerous other groups (civic, social and business). Agreement on "one story" for promotional purposes is critical for the program. Each group will have its own areas of expertise, but SYNERGIZING their efforts is invaluable for the project's success. 2. Gaining the support and consensus of the Business and Commerce Community: Their active participation in the program on an on-going basis is essential in promoting Richmond as a place for conducting business. As examples of Richmond's conducive business environment, their active and visible presence must be maximized. They are part of the city, and will benefit greatly from the success of the RICHMOND XXI PROJECT. Assignment of responsibilities for selection of specific leadership for the implementation of the program, as well as selection of an ad agency or public relations firm to further develop and coordinate the image promotion: Someone or some group needs to he in charge of this complex program. Rapid, flexible decision making will be necessary as the program evolves. A final authority for administrative decisions must be clearly established. Page 13 Consistency and coordination of the many aspects of the program will be a challenging management opportunity. Strong central management of the program is recommended to avoid natural "turf protection" and special interests which could occur. The scope of the project must be the single priority of leadership. Long-range success is dependent upon sound leadership. Funding, and the organization of means for continued funding of the program: Initial funding must be carefully measured and evaluated. Short-circuiting of the program because of money shortages is an issue which needs to be considered at all times. It is imperative that leadership maintain a highly professional, efficient and coordinated marketing campaign with enough flexibility to adapt to changes in marketing trends and strategies. The costs of any viable marketing program will be high, so it is important to not sacrifice quality for minimal savings of money. The long-range benefits must be kept in focus. Development and implementation of support communi- cations: This entails agreement upon final name identifica- tion, as well as graphic identification for the program. Standardization on all graphic applications for all uses must be established and be able to be enforced by leadership. The graphic images seen by the vari- ous publics who will become Richmond's audiences must be absolutely consistent. The program is too costly and complex to permit incorrect or inconsis- tent images from being presented. Applications of the graphics for the image and theme are numerous: signage banners billboards advertising displays stationery bumper stickers press releases brochures sponsorship endorsements ~lcnmon~ Ax! Page 14 Additional applications would include: - newsletters - special activities - seasonal programs - special street lighting - special road signage - kiosks in downtown and other areas - transportation (bus system, city vehicles, etc.) Summary: The entire promotional campaign must be designed in such a way as to endure the inevitable changes in local and regional leadership, as well as national and local marketing trends. It is essential that this be a flexible, well-man- aged and coordinated communications program to allow for the unforeseen problems which might Occur. Leadership must be exacting in its mandate and role, and in its willingness to make some very sensitive and difficult decisions in assuring the success of the RICHMOND XXI PROJECT. Richmond XXI Page 15 V. INTERVIEW RESULTS The information gathered during the interviewing process played an important role in the development of the Strategic Recommendations. The opinions of those who were interviewed were balanced against the compara- tive urban research and other expertise. The following is a capsulization of the statistical findings gathered in interviews conducted during June 1986 in Richmond, Virginia. Items are listed in their "order of importance" according to actual "priority" rankings expressed by those interviewed. All "priority rankings" obtained in these interviews in the categories of OBJECTIVES, THE INAGE FOUNDATION and ANENIT¥ ASSETS were strictly voluntary and not suggest- ed or solicited by the interviewers in any manner. All responses were the result of, or in answer to open- ended questions pertaining to these three (3) categor- ies. Priority rankings are based upon the frequency of repetition. A. OBJECTIVES On the survey, this section was entitled, 'Amenity OpPortunities,,, and referred to the st" long- "be range and short-range targets which would increase the city's ability to achieve the overall goals of the RICH~)OND XXI PROJECT. These items are ranked according to the total number of times each "Target" was suggested as a first or second "top priority" OBJECTIVE by those interviewed: 1. Convention Business and Tourism 2. James River 3. Corporate/Business Retention and Attraction of Relocating Business 4. Downtown Housing 5. Image Promotion 6. Transportation 7. Public Education 8. Downtown Nightlife 9. Airport 10. Historic Neighborhoods Restoration 11. Regional Government Structuring 2 and Cooperation 3 12. "New" Single Major Attraction 1 All other suggested "Targets" received 6 votes. Priority #1 ~2 9 11 9 8 6 9 8 6 11 3 6 4 5 4 3 4 4 I 0 1 Page 16 THE IMAGE FOUNDATION was referred to as "Natural Amenity Features' on the survey. These are considered as the existing "Promotable Features" of Richmond which are currently structured to serve best as major supporting mechanisms/features for attaining the overall OBJECTIVES. Their priority ranking is based upon the total number of times the respondents rated each "Feature" as a first or second "top priority". 1. Geographic Proximity 2. The People 3. Quality of Life 4. Corporate/Business Diversity and Leadership 5. Historic Heritage 6. James River 7. Natural and Architectural Beauty 8. Cultural Amenity Package 9. Local and Regional Government 10. Openness of Society Priority #1 #2 12 10 11 4 9 4 7 6 8 4 9 2 4 4 4 3 2 5 3 2 All other suggested "Features" received 18 votes AMENITY ASSETS are the attributes and assets of Richmond which require additional attention and strengthening to fully benefit the city's image program. It was called the "Obvious Deficiency" section on the survey, and referred to assets which are currently perceived as impeding the city's growth and promotion plans. These are ranked according to the total times each AMENITY ASSET was rated as a first or second "top priority" Deficiency by those interviewed. Priority #1 ~2 1. Regional Government Cooperation "9 9 2. Airport 9 6 3. Lack of an Image 6 3 4. James River 4 4 5. Crime 5 2 6. Public Schools 5 2 7. Taxi System 2 3 8. Racial Situation 2 3 9. Historic Heritage 3 1 10. Economic Inequities I 2 All other suggested "Deficiencies" received 13 votes CHESTERFI ELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA MEETING DATE: February 25, 1987 ITEM NUMBER: 7oBo SUBJECT: Resolution Recognizing Mrs. Katherine C. Godsey Upon Her Re ti rement COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION Whereas, Mrs. Katherine C. Godsey has retired from the Registrar's Office, Chesterfield County, on January 1, 1987; and Whereas, Mrs. Godsey had provided nineteen years of quality service to the citizens of Chesterfield, serving as a loyal and conscientious Assistant Registrar. She has always been willing to serve on committees and help wherever she was needed. She will leave a void in the Regis- trar's Office and will be deeply missed. Her co-workers' wish for her is to have many enjoyable retirement years. Whereas, Chesterfield County and the Board of Supervisors will miss Mrs. Godsey's diligent service. Now, Therefore, Be It Resolved, that this Board of Supervisors publicly recognizes Mrs. Godsey and extends on behalf of its members and the citizens of Chesterfield County their appreciation for her service to the County. ATTACHMENTS: YES [3 NO [] And, Be It Further Resolved, that a copy of this Resolution be presented to Mrs. Godsey and that this Resolution be permanently recorded among the papers of this Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County, Virginia. r erick W. Willi~x~,Jr. Director, Human Resource Management SIGNATURE: ~ ...... cOU~DMi NiSTRATOR f~ ¢~2 CHESTERFI ELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGE NDA MEETING DATE SUBJECT: February 25, 1987 ITEM NUMBER:_, 7.C. Resolution Recognizing Outstanding Efforts of the Easter Seal Society COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION The Board is requested to adopt the attached resolution which will be presented by Mr. Daniel at the Easter Seal Telethon in March. PREPARED BY;_ ATTACHMENTS: YES E~ NO ri COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOGNIZING OUTSTANDING EFFORTS OF THE EASTER SEAL SOCIETY WHEREAS, the Easter Seal Society has provided services to disabled children and adults in Virginia since 1944; and WHEREAS, the Society operates speech centers across the State and provides direct, rehabilitative services such as wheelchairs and braces to people in need; and WHEREAS, the Society sponsors Stroke Clubs and Voice Clubs and operates Camp Easter Seal East and West in an effort to improve the quality of Life for disabled persons. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors encourages the support of all its citizens to aid the Society through volunteer actions and through contributions to make the 1987 campaign even more successful for those who are aided by the untiring and enthusiastic efforts of the Easter Seal Society as demands for human service programs are ever increasing. CHESTERFI ELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA MEETING DATE: SUBJECT: February 25, 1987 ITEM NUMBER: MODEL COUNTY GOVERNMENT DAY 7oD. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION The Youth Services Commission requests the Board of Supervisors to designate May 6, 1987 as Model Government Day. In preparation for this event, several training sessions are held with the students to familiarize them with the day's requirements and activities. March 25, 1987 will be a day of training during which students will tour County facilities, attend the Board of Supervisors' meeting, meet with Board members, and visit with the various County officials whose positions they will assume. Ms. Lee Chase, Program Specialist for Social Studies, will make a few brief remarks to the Board on March 25, 1987. Board Action Requested 1. Adopt the attached resolution proclaiming May 6, 1987 as Model County Government Day. 2. Allot time at the Board of Supervisors meeting on March 25, 1987 to welcome Ms. Lee Chase and the students. ATTACHMENTS: YES [~ NO [] 3. Meet with the students acting as the Board of Supervisors from 11:30 a.m. to noon following the March 25th meeting. ffo~ert/L. Masden Assistant County Administrator/Human Servic(~s SIGNATURE: C OU N~~N ! STRATOR DECLARING May 6, 1987 Model County Government Day WHEREAS, Students in the eleventh and twelfth grades in Chesterfield County Schools have been studying local government; and WHEREAS, Through a competitive process, a special group of these students have been selected to represent their schools in portraying the roles of County Officials on May 6, 1987; and WHEREAS, An understanding of the process and functions of local government is a key ingredient to effective citizenship; and WHEREAS, The Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors recognizes the importance of young people having opportunities to learn about their government in order to become informed, active citizens; and WHEREAS, The Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors supports activities that cultivate leadership among the youth of Chesterfield County. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors that the 6th day of May, 1987 is hereby proclaimed Model County Government Day in Chesterfield County and that this observance is called to the attention of all citizens. PRINCIPAL CEREMONIES AND ACTIVITIES FOR THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AND COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR Model County Government Day March 25 and May 6, 1987 DAY/TIME ACTIVITY OFFICIAL REQUESTED March 25 9:00-11:30 Students attend Board of Supervisors meeting; Board will be asked to adopt a resolution proclaiming May 6 Model County Government Day; students will be introduced to the Board by a School Board staff member. Board of Supervisors March 25 ll:30-Noon March 25 3:00-4:00 Students assuming Board of Supervisors' roles meet with Board members Students attend a 30 minute introductory meeting with their County Official hosts Board of Supervisors County Officials May 6 8:00 a.m. Mr. Hedrick welcomes students at Voc Tech Center breakfast; Dr. Sullins will address the students as well. Mr. Hedrick May 6 9:15-11:45 Students meet and work with their County Official hosts County Officials May 6 3:15-4:00 Chairman of the Board of Supervisors addresses students at the Closing Ceremony; Chairmen of the School Board and Youth Services Commission will speak and hand out certificates Chairman of the Board of Supervisors CHESTERFI ELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA MEETING DATE' February 25, 1987 ITEM NUMBER' 7oE. .SUBJECT: Resolution Recognizing Dr. W. Clinton Pettus for Outstanding Public Service COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION The State Council of Higher Education has established an annual award program for faculty members in State Institutions of Higher Education for outstanding instruction, research and public service. Dr. W. Clinton Pettus, Dean, School of Natural Science, at Virginia State University has been nominated for this year's award for outstandin< public service. The Board is requested to adopt the attached resolution. ATTACHMENTS: YES :![] NO [] SIGNATURE: COUNTY ADMI NISTRATOR RESOLUTION ON DR. W. CLINTON PETTUS WHEREAS, the State Council of Higher Education has established a program for annual recognition of faculty members in State Institutions of Higher Education for outstanding contributions in Instruction, Research and Public Service; and WHEREAS, Dr. Clinton Pettus, Dean of School of Natural Sciences at Virginia State University is a candidate for the award for outstanding public service by a faculty member; and WHEREAS, Dr. Pettus has provided critical leadership on Chesterfield County's Community Services Board for six (6) years in various capacities including chairman and vice chairman; and WHEREAS, Dr. Pettus provided the principal leadership on the recent countywide Human Service needs assessment requested by the Board of Supervisors and the Board of Trustees of the Greater Richmond United Way; and WHEREAS, Dr. Pettus has served the county and his local community in numerous capacities at great sacrifice to himself and his family. NOW,~EREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County that the State Council of Higher Education is hereby urged to carefully consider Dr. Pettus for the award of Outstanding Faculty Member in the Commonwealth of Virginia for his dedicated public service. BE IT RESOLVED FURTHER, that the Board of Supervisors hereby expresses its sincere appreciation to Dr. Pettus for his dedicated public service to the County of Chesterfield and his fellow citizens. SIGNS MAPS POTENTIAL COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH NAME CHANGE (POWHITE PARKWAY TO CHESTERFIELD PARKWAY) On 2-4-87 discussions were held with VDHT representative Everett Convington, Assistant District Engineer in charge of maintenance. He consulted with Ste~e Hern, VDHT sign engineer. They raised the following issues: 1) Height of letters on current signs conforms to Interstate standards. 2) Adding five additional letters will necessitate a longer sign rather than an overlay. 3) If an overlay were used on such signs, letters would be substandard and would not conform to other letters on the same sign. 4) Some signs that could be salvaged will have to go back to the sign shop for overlays instead of being done in the field. 5) Special equipment rented. (cranes) would have to be 6) Traffic control especially on overheads and cantilevered signs will be difficult and expensive. 7) VDHT may ask us to bear' the cost of replacing similar signs on 1-195, 1-95- and 1-64 where "Powhite Parkway" appears. 8) The City of Richmond may ask us to bear the cost of replacing their signs referring to the "Powhite Parkway." 9) VDHT is proceeding with signs Extension." for "Powhite Their initial cost estimate: $75,000 Detailed cost analysis will be done by VDHT on request. Estimate 40 man hours each for an engineer and helper. R.M.A., City of Richmond, VDHT, AAA and other private maps would be inaccurate. R.M.A. currently has approximately 120,000 maps on hand. Cost to replace R.M.A. maps 250,000: $6,250 CHESTERFI ELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA MEETING DATE SUBJECT: February 25, 1987 ITEM NUMBER; 9.a. Guidelines relating to the extension of utility lines to promote economic development COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: This item was deferred from the last meeting to allow the Chesterfield Business Council to review the matter further. Mr. Dodd advises they have not had ample time to do so and he will be requesting an additional deferral. Since this was a public hearing and deferred to a specific date and time, it had to be placed on the agenda for consideration the deferral. SUMMARY OFINFORMATION: Mr. Dodd and other members of the Board of Supervisors have requested the preparation of guidelines to further define Sections 20-1.31(c) and 20-1.44(c) of the County Code (see attached) relating to the extension of utility lines which promote the economic development of the County. The following represent guidelines that the County recommends utilizing in considering financial participation in the extension of utility lines to encourage economic development: The project developer agrees to match the County contribution on a three-dollar County:one dollar developer ratio; The estimated increased property tax revenue above tax revenue that would be received if the property developed low density residentially will offset the County's cost of utility extension within three (3) years of issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy; Continued next page - ATTACHMENTS: YES I~ NO [] PREPARED BY~~ Sale, Asst. County Administrator for Development SIGNATURE. COUNT't:' ADMINISTRATOR Page Two - Extension of Utility Lines - Economic Development Ce The project developer agrees to post a performance bond to repay County costs for utility extension if the proposed industrial development does not occur as proposed within two (2) years and resultant tax revenue does not occur within three (3) years of issuance of Certificate of Occupancy; The eligible economic development users include all uses permitted in the M-l, M-2 and M-3 zoning districts except mobile homes and professional offices. Recommendation: The suggested guidelines. Board of Supervisors approve the pb Attachment Chapter 20. Utilities Section 20-1.31(c) In those limited circumstances where the extension of a water line using county funds will promote the economic development of the county and where it is not practical for the properties to be served to fund all or a portion of such extension costs, the county may agree to fund such extensions upon terms and conditions imposed by the county. Such extension should be calculated to result in tangible and definable economic development within the county and may not be used for extensions to serve new residential growth or commercial growth that is likely to occur in the absence of county funding. Any such extensions for economic development must be added as a project to the Utilities Capital Improvement Program. Section 20-1.44(c) In those limited circumstances where the extension of a sewer line using county funds will promote the economic development of the county and where it is not practical for the properties to be served to fund all or a portion of such extension costs, the county may agree to fund such extensions upon terms and conditions imposed by the county. Such extension should be calculated to result in tangible and definable economic development within the county and may not be used for extensions to serve new residential growth or commercial growth that is likely to occur in the absence of county funding. Any such extensions for economic development must be added as a project to the Utilities Capital Improvement Program. CHESTERFI ELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA MEETING DATE: SUBJECT: February 25, 1987 APPOINTMENTS DRUG ABUSE TASK FORCE ITEM NUMBER: 9.Bo COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Mr. Daniel should nominate two people to serve on the Drug Abuse Task Force representing Dale District. PREPARED BY;. ATTACHMENTS: YES I'1 NO ~ SIGNATURE: COUNTY'" ADM I NI STRATOR CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA MEETING DATE: February 25, 1987 ITEM NUMBER: III 10. SUBJECT: Public Hearing to Consider Adoption of an Ordinance Permitting Local Enforcement of a Building Maintenance Code as a Portion of the Uniform Statewide Building Code COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION Currently under state law the County's Building Official is required to enforce Volume I of the Virginia Uniform Statewide Building Code ("VUSBC") regulating new construction. Effective October 1, 1986, localities were given the option to enforce Volume II of the VUSBC regulating the maintenance of existing buildings. Since 1983, the Building Official has been authorized to inspect existing structures for proper maintenance in accor- dance with VUSBC. However, if, upon inspection, a problem is discovered, he. can only encourage the owner to remedy the defect. He cannot compel correction unless the problem is so severe that the lives or health of County residents other than the occupants of the building are endangered. (Continued) ATTACHMENTS: YES '~ NO [] Steven L. Micas County Attorney SIGNATURE: COUNTY A~MI N ISTRATOR Agenda Item February 25, 1987 Page 2 Under Volume II of the VUSBC, referred to as the Building Maintenance Code, localities are given the option to provide their building officials with authority to ensure that existing buildings are properly maintained and are not permitted to deteriorate to an unsafe condition for the occupants. Although the Building Maintenance Code, if incorporated into the County Code, would allow VUSBC standards to be enforced in all existing buildings, the County's Office of Building Inspection, consistent with current practice, would not inspect owner-occupied single- family dwellings and would continue to handle inspections on a complaint basis. Therefore, the only change in the office's current program that would occur as a result of the attached ordinance, would be to give the Building Official the legal authority to compel, rather than merely encourage, compliance with the building code in an existing structure. Since the Building Official already has personnel on his staff to perform inspections on existing structures, no addition- al personnel will be required if the attached ordinance is adopted. Furthermore, he has discussed the ordinance with the building community which has raised no objections to its adoption. The City of Richmond has already adopted the Building Maintenance Code and at least forty other localities, including Henrico County are preparing to present similar ordinances to their governing bodies. cd11048:85C16 AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND ARTICLE I, CHAPTER 6 OF THE CODE OF THE COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD, 1978, AS AMENDED BY ADD I NG SECT I ON 6-2.3 AUTHORIZING THE BUILDING OFFICIAL TO ENFORCE VOLUME II OF THE VIRGINIA UNIFORM STATEWIDE BUILDING CODE BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfieild Cc. ur~t y: (1) That the Code of the County of Chesterfield, 1978, as amended, is amended by adding Section 6-2.3 as follows: Section 6-2.3 Mainter~ance Code. Same - Authnrity to er, force the Buildii~_~ In addition to the authority otherwise chapter, the building official shall have er~force the provisions of Vol u~e II of the Statewide Building Code, 1984 editiorb or knowr~ as the Building Mair~tenance Code. grant ed by the authority Virginia Uni fo~i~m as may be amendeqi, call 1051 :PC THE RICHMON NEWS Th~s lished , City r~f ~ichmond, State of Virginia. O CHESTERFI ELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGE NDA MEETING DATE: February 25, 1987 SUBJECT: REGIONAL FARMERS' MARKET SUPPORT ITEM NUMBER: ll.A. COUNTY ADMIN'ISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The legislature established a Virginia Farmers' Market Board to establish a network of farmers market facilities across the state. Originally, the Richmond area was identified as the location of one of these facilities. Virginia Department of Agriculture officials estimate that this network could generate $40 - $50 million annually in gross market sales, Consequently, many localities have expressed an interest in having one of these facilities in their area. A facility of this type in the Richmond Metropolitan area would open a new avenue of marketing for the farmers in Chesterfield County. Endorsement of the attached resolution would keep the Farmers' Market Board aware of the importance of locating one of these facilities in the Richmond Metropolitan area. PREPARED BY; Richard A. Nunnallv / ATTACHMENTS: YES ~ NO r'l SIGNATURE: ~ / '~C'~OUNTY ADMINISTRATOR RIg$OLI~ION WHEREAS, the General Assembly authorized the formation of the Virginia Farmers' Market Board, a mechanism for creating a network of wholesale, shipping point and retail farmers'imarkets throughout the Commonwealth; and WHEREAS, the Virginia Farmers' Market Board has been empowered by the legislature to establish a network of farmers' market facilities across the state; and WHEREAS, localities across the state have ekpressed their interest and support for the development of a farmers' market network by offering valuable land for locating a market facility; and WHEREAS, the Richmond Metropolitan area anticipates such facilities will enhance the marketing and financial status of Virginia agriculture and well as the local economy; and WHEREAS, four traditional farmers have converted all or part of their land to the production of fruits, vegetables and other horticultural crops; and WHEREAS, seven additional operators are cUrrently producing only horticultural crops such as, fruits, vegetables, and Christmas trees; and WHEREAS, Chesterfield County farmers will benefit from this outlet for marketing their locally grown commodities. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors endorses the development of a wholesale distribution farmers' market facility for the Richmond Metropolitan area, to serve as the centralized marketing hub for this statewide marketing network. RESOLUTION WHEREAS, the General Assembly authorized the formation of the Virginia Farmers' Market Board, a mechanism for creating a network of wholesale, shipping point and retail farmers'imarkets throughout the Commonwealth~ and WHEREAS, the Virginia Farmers' Market Board has been empowered by the legislature to establish a network of farmers' market facilities across the state; and WHEREAS, localities across the state have expressed their interest and support for the development of a farmers' market network by offering valuable land for locating a market facility; and WHEREAS, the Richmond Metropolitan area anticipates such facilities will enhance the marketing and financial status of Virginia agriculture and well as the local economy; and 'WHEREAS, four traditional farmers have converted all or part of their land to the production of fruits, vegetables and other horticultural crops~ and WHEREAS, seven additional operators are currently producing only horticultural crops such as, fruits, vegetables, and Christmas trees; and WHEREAS, Chesterfield County farmers will benefit from this outlet for marketing their locally grown commodities. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors endorses the development of a wholesale distribution farmers' market facility for the Richmond Metropolitan area, to serve as the centralized marketing hub for this statewide marketing network. RESOLUTION WHEREAS, the General Assembly authorized the formation of the Virginia Farmers' Market Board, a mechanism for creating a network of wholesale, shipping point and retail farmers' markets throughout the Commonwealth; and WHEREAS, the Virginia Farmers' Market Board has been empowered by the legislature to establish a network of farmers' market facilities across the state; and WHEREAS, localities across the state have expressed their interest and support for the development of a farmers' market network by offering valuable land for locating a market facility; and WHEREAS, the Richmond Metropolitan area anticipates such facilities will enhance the marketing and financial status of Virginia agriculture and well as the local economy; and WHEREAS, Chesterfield County farmers will benefit from this outlet for marketing their locally grown commodities; NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors endorses the development of a wholesale distribution farmers' market facility for the Richmond Metropolitan area, to serve as the centralized marketing hub for this statewide marketing network. CHESTERFI ELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA MEETING DATE: February 25~ 1987 SUBJECT: COntract Award - Roof Design Work ITEM NUMBER: ll.B. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: This item requests Board approval for the County Administrator to enter into a contract with Moseley Hening Associates (MHA) for design work and direct supervision to replace roofs on four County Buildings. Architectural services are necessary because the nature of restoration and repairs requires complete removal and replacement of the old roofs. Proposals have been solicited, received and evaluated for analysis, design and replacement of new roofs on the following buildings: Juvenile Courts, Board Room, Circuit Court Record Room and original portion of Circuit Court Clerk's Office. A total of over 32,000 square feet of roof area is included in this contract. An evaluation committee made up of representatives of General Services, Construction Manage- ment and Purchasing Departments reviewed 8 proposals, interviewed 4 firms and recommends MHA of Richmond as the best qualified firm to perform the design work. The committee has negotiated a design fee of $17,710 ($11,710 for design and up to a maximum of $6,000 at $40 hour for direct supervision of contractors). Funds for design are available in the Buildings and Grounds maintenance capital operating budget. It is anticipated that sufficient funds for construction will be available after bids are received in the late spring to complete work by this summer. (Cont. next page) ~Y. ohn R. Boykin, ~. ~ Assit. Director/General Services ATTACHMENTS: YES [] NO r'~ SIGNATURE: , COUNTY ADMI NISTRATOR Page 2 February 25, 1987 Action Required by Board: Authorize the County Administrator to enter into a contract with MHA for roof design and construction inspection. CHESTERFI ELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AG E NDA MEETING DATE: February 25, 1987 SUBJECT: REGIONAL FARMERS' MARKET SUPPORT ITEM NUMBER: ll.A. COUNTY ADMIN'ISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION The legislature established a Virginia Farmers' Market Board to establish a network of farmers market facilities across the state. Originally, the Richmond area was identified as the location of one of these facilities. Virginia Department of Agriculture officials estimate that this network could generate $40 - $50 million annually in gross market sales, Consequently, many localities have expressed an interest in having one of these facilities in their area. A facility of this type in the Richmond Metropolitan area would open a new avenue of marketing for the farmers in Chesterfield County. Endorsement of the attached resolution would keep the Farmers' Market Board aware of the importance of locating one of these facilities in'the Richmond Metropolitan area. PREPARED BY~ , Richard A. Nunnally _ ATTACHMENTS: YES IFI NO [] RESOLUTION WHEREAS, the General Assembly authorized the fbrmation of the Virginia Farmers' Market Board, a mechanism for creating a network of wholesale, shipping point and retail farmers'imarkets throughout the Commonwealth; and WHEREAS, the Virginia Farmers' Market Board has been empowered by the legislature to establish a network of farmers' market facilities across the state; and WHEREAS, localities across the state have ekpressed their interest and support for the development of a farmers' market network by offering valuable land for locating a market facility; and WHEREAS, the Richmond Metropolitan area anticipates such facilities will enhance the marketing and financial status of Virginia agriculture and well as the local economy; and WHEREAS, four traditional farmers have converted all or part of their land to the production of fruits, vegetables and other horticultural crops; and WHEREAS, seven additional operators are cUrrently producing only horticultural crops such as, fruits, vegetables, and Christmas trees; and WHEREAS, Chesterfield County farmers will benefit from this outlet for marketing their locally grown commodities. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors endorses the development of a wholesale distribution farmers' market facility for the Richmond Metropolitan area, to serve as the centralized marketing hub for this statewide marketing network. RESOLUTION WHEREAS, the General Assembly authorized the formation of the Virginia Farmers' Market Board, a mechanism for creating a network of wholesale, shipping point and retail farmers'imarkets throughout the Commonwealth; and WHEREAS, the Virginia Farmers' Market Board has been empowered by the legislature to establish a network of farmers' market facilities across the state; and WHEREAS, localities across the state have expressed their interest and support for the development of a farmers' market network by offering valuable land for locating a market facility; and WHEREAS, the Richmond Metropolitan area anticipates such facilities will enhance the marketing and financial status of Virginia agriculture and well as the local economy; and WHEREAS, four traditional farmers have converted all or part of their land to the production of fruits, vegetables and other horticultural crops; and WHEREAS, seven additional operators are currently Producing only horticultural crops such as, fruits, vegetables, and Christmas trees; and WHEREAS, Chesterfield County farmers will benefit from this outlet for marketing their locally grown commodities. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors endorses the development of a wholesale distribution farmers' market facility for the Richmond Metropolitan area, to serve as the centralized marketing hub for this statewide marketing network. RESOLUT I ON WHEREAS, the General Assembly authorized the formation of the Virginia Farmers' Market Board, a mechanism for creating a network of wholesale, shipping point and retail farmers' markets throughout the Commonwealth; and WHEREAS, the Virginia Farmers' Market Board has been empowered by the legislature to establish a network of farmers' market facilities across the state; and WHEREAS, localities across the state have expressed their interest and support for the development of a farmers' market network by offering valuable land for locating a market facility; and WHEREAS, the Richmond Metropolitan area anticipates such facilities will enhance the marketing and financial status of Virginia agriculture and well as the local economy; and WHEREAS, Chesterfield County farmers will benefit from this outlet for marketing their locally grown commodities~ NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors endorses the development of a wholesale distribution farmers' market facility for the Richmond Metropolitan area, to serve as the centralized marketing hub for this statewide marketing network. CHESTERFI ELD COUNTY BOARD OF' SUPERVISORS AGENDA MEETING DATE' lq"C, hl"llRl~ ?~¢ 1 qR? ITEM NUMBER: ~UBJECT: Appointment of Preservation C~,,~Httee Members ll.C. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION Section 21-202 of the Historic Districts and Landmarks ordinance requires a Preservation ConTaittee of seven (7) members to be appointed by the Board of Supervisors; of which, one member is to be an architect or landscape architect, another to be a contractor, another to be a representative of a local historical society, and one member to be a representative of the State Division of Historic Landmarks. In order to create Preservation CuL~t~ttee continuity, three members should be appointed for three year terms, two members for two year terms, and two members for one year terms. Mr. Dodd will be nominating Mr. ~ryan Walker and Mr. Jim Daniel for appointment. ATTACHMENTS: YES I-1 NO PREPARED B J.~34~ ~'. - ~' Yk T~o~as E. Jaco~on Director of Planning AG2FB142/lb SIGNATURE: ADM I N I STRATOR CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGE NDA MEETING DATE: February 25, 1987 ITEM NUMBER: 11. D. 1. SUBJECT: Set Public Hearing Date to Consider Conveyance of a Parcel in the Airport Industrial Park to Mr. & Mrs. George A. Kcraget, and Authorize County Administrator to Execute a Contingent Sales Contract COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION Mr. & Mrs. George A. Kcraget desire to purchase a 2.5 acre + tract on the southwest corner of Virginia Pine Court at $25,000 pe--r acre (see attached map). The parcel is bounded by Engineering Virginia, Industrial Machine, Sealeze, and the County of Chesterfield. A purchase agreement has been prepared and the County Administrator should be granted execution authority. The Kcragets plan to construct a 10,500 square foot facility to be used for custom cabinet and millwork manufacture. The company will employ up to ten persons. Investment value is estimated at $400,000. RECOMMENDATION Board authorize the County Administrator to execute sales contract and set March 25, 1987, as the public hearing date to consider this conveyance. Attachments AGI7F26/dem ATTACHMENTS: YES ~ NO I-1 ~anley ~. ~alderson, Jr. / D ire_c tol~ff Economic / Development SIGNATURE: COUNTY ADM I N! STRATOR ,/ Ill "?RRCE'. :0' n,. 0 · CHESTERFIELD COUNTY' BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA MEETING DATE: February 25, 1987 ITEM NUMBER: ll.D.2. Chesterfield Airport Industrial Park: Establishment SUB4ECT: of Interim Sale Price COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION This is a request to establish an interim sale price for property in the Chesterfield County Airport Industrial Park to be set at $37,500 per acre for all land versus current prices of $25,000 and $32,500 (taxiway frontage). The County has received a letter of intent to purchase land in the Chesterfield Airport Industrial Park (see attached). The client understands that the current established selling price is $25,000 per acre but, at the instruction of the Administration, they have been informed that a quoted contractual price may be higher if so determined. Although 'the County is exploring outside appraisal of the Airpark property for future sales, a firm price quote to this prospect is needed so as to respond to the client in a timely manner and not risk the loss of this sale. Development and use of this property by this prospect represents a potential for substantial revenues for the County. The prospect plans to construct a 30,000 square foot facility and locate its corporate headquarters, as well as an operations facility, in the Airpark. Continued next page- PREPARED BY;~~~--~ / ~tan~ R. Balderson, Jr. Director of Economic Development ATTACHMENTS: YES I~ NO [] SIGNATURE :" COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR Agenda Item Chesterfield Airport Industrial Park: Interim Sale Price February 25, 1987 Page Two Establishment of At best, it will take three months to receive an independent appraisal of the land. On August 13, 1986, Mr. Applegate requested a price structure review for the sale of property at the Airport Industrial Park. Economic Development conducted a review and recommended a price increase based on comparisons of County industrial parks, and freestanding sites (see attached). The County Assessor, after an informal review of Economic Development's conclusions, has indicated the price change recommended appears reasonable. RECOMMENDATION Establish an interim sale price for property in the Chesterfield County Airport Industrial Park to be set at $37,500 per acre for all land versus current prices of $25,000 and $32,500 ( taxiway frontage ) . ~ pb Attachments 4237 CAROLINA AVENUE, RICHMOND, VIRGINIA 23222/804-329-1332 OFFICES: LYNCHBURG, CHARLOTTES~ .f.~. & }:{Ar .W. fGH-DURHAM January 20, 1987 Mr. Richard Franklin Marketing Specialist Department of Economic Development P.O. Box 40 Chesterfield, Virginia 23832 RE: Chesterfield County Airport Industrial Park Land Purchase Dear Mr. Franklin: This letter is to serve as notice of our intent to purchase land in the Chesterfield County Airport Industrial Park. This land will be improved by construction of a warehouse facility and our corporate headquarters. Operations and management staff from Richmond and Lynchburg, Virginia and from Chesterfield County will be relocated to the Park. The Young Companies would like to immediately pursue selection of six (6) acres either fronting on Reycan Road or Whitepine Road. Improvements will consist of approximately 30,000 sq.ft, of ware- house space and approximately 3,000 sq.ft, of general office space. It is our understanding that the purchase price for land in the Park is currently $ 25,000.00 per acre and is subject to approval by the County Board of Supervisors. We also understand that normal contingencies of zoning, financing, and soil suitability for construction would be covered in a formal purchase contract. We are desirous of starting this project quickly and ask for your assistance in locating the best site at current rates. DCY/dk v ~- BOARD OF SUPERVISORS R. GARLAND DODD , CHAIRMAN BERMUDA DISTRICT HARRY G. DANIEL, VICE CHAIRMAN DALE DISTRICT G. H. APPLEGATE CLOVER HILL DISTRICT JOAN GIRONE MIDLOTHIAN DISTRICT JESSE J. MAYES MATOACA DISTRICT CHESTERFIELD COUNTY P.O. BOX 40 CH ESTER FIELD,.VIRGINIA 23832 COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR RICHARD L. HEDRICK MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors Richard L. Hedrick, County Administrator Stanley R. Balderson, Jr., Director of Economic De August 29, 1986 Recommended Increase in Per Acreage Sale Price of Chesterfield County Airpark Property On August 13, 1986, Mr. Applegate requested that we review the price structure for the sale of property at the County's Industrial Park. The review has been accomplished and, based on comparison of County industrial parks and free- standing sites (see attached), we recommend that the property in the Airpark be offered at $37,500 per acre as opposed to the current price of $25,000 per acre with the ~xception that property fronting any airport taxiway having access thereto, be sold at $40,000 per acre as opposed to the current $32,500 per acre price. We are basing this recommendation on general inflationary factors, the price comparisons and differentials exemplified in the attached material, and a very strong belief that area improvements including the 288 construction has increased the value of this very marketable property. cc: Richard F. Sale, Assistant County Administrator for Community Development SB6AU53/dem E ,0NOMIC DEVELOPMEN, CHESTERFIELD COUNTY Freestanding Sites Me Be e me e 10. 11. 12. Alverser Road -- Tax Map 16-8 (i) Parcels 4 and 6 6 acres -- Office zoning -- $105,000/acre Halinda -- Tax Map 79-10 (1) Parcel 3 38 acres -- $36,400/acre Lone Star -- Tax Map 98-7 (1) Parcel 1 95 acres -- $5,263/acre Pruitt -- Tax Map 98-11 (1) Parcel 7 99 acres -- Zoning: A -- $25,000/acre Hanbury -- Tax Map 98-16 (i) Parcel 9 36 acres -- Zoning: M-3 -- $40,000 - $50,000/acre Arundel/Walthall -- Tax Map 115-13 (1) Parcel 2 70 acres -- Zoning: A -- $5,000/acre Shoosmith; Old Stage Road -- Tax Map 116-4 (1) Parcel 1 4 acres -- Zoning: M-3 -- $30,000/acre Will-Car -- Tax Map 117-10 (i) Parcel 16 60 acres -- Zoning: M-2 -- $16,529/acre Ramblewood Road -- Tax Map 117-13 (2) Parcels 15 and 16 3 acres -- Zoning: M-3 -- $25,000 Albar -- Tax Map 134-1 (1) Parcel 14 8 acres -- Zoning: M-1 -- $20,000 - $60,000/acre Ruffin Mill Road -- Tax Map 149-8 (1) Parcel 5 20 acres -- Zoning: M-1 -- $15,000 - $20,000/acre Tax Map 150-13 (1) Parcel 2 186 acres -- Zoning: A -- $5,000 - $7,000/acre mean = 31,266 median = 25,000 LST 6AU 36/-clem E DNOMIC DEVELOPMEN CHESTERFIELD COUNTY Name Johnston-Willis Center Sommerville Southport CSX Industrial Bermuda Industrial Airport Industrial Walmsley Industrial INDUSTRIAL PARKS Zoning. M-1 M-1 M-1 M-1 M-i M-1 M-1 Acreage 10 150 None 5O 150 30O 15 Sellin~ Price $100,~00/acre $ 72,500/acre $ 65,000/acre $ 40,000/acre $30 - 35,000/acre $25 - 32,500/acre $40 - 45,000/acre mean = 55,714.3 median = 40,000 combined mean = 38,549.5 combined median = 33,750 L~T~lU371hem CHESTERFI ELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AG E NDA MEETING DATE: February 25, 1987 ITEM NUMBER; ll.D.3. SUBJECT: Resolution confirming the proceedings of the Industrial Development Authority of the County of Chesterfield approving the issuance of revenue bonds to Linwood R. Lucord, Jr. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: On February 18, 1987, the Chesterfield Industrial Development Authority held a public hearing to consider industrial revenue financing not to exceed $650,000.00 for Linwood R. Lucord, Jr. The Board needs to confirm the issuance of Industrial Revenue Bonds by the adoption of a Resolution. The Resolution certifying the Authority's action has been prepared by Williams, Mullen, Christian & Dobbin, counsel for Linwood R. Lucord, Jr. Linwood R. Lucord, Jr. plans to construct and equip a 15,000 square foot facility to be leased to and operated by Feed Water Systems, Inc. The facility will be located on a 2.8 acre ~ parcel in the Chesterfield Airpark. ATTACHMENTS: YES [] NO [] SIGNATURE: / Stanl/y/~. Bal~erson, Jr., Directo Depa~P~ent of Economic Development COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR 0 31 RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD, VIRGINIA WHEREAS, the Industrial Development Authority of the County of Chesterfield (the Authority) has considered the application of Linwood R. Lucord, Jr. (the Applicant), for the issuance of the Authority's industrial development revenue bonds in an amount not to exceed $650,000 (the Bonds) to assist in the financing of the Applicant's acquisition of land and construction and equipping of a manufacturing facility (the Project) to be located on approximately 2.8 acres of land which fronts 350 feet on the south side of Reycan Road, commencing 350 feet southwest of the west line of Whitepine Road, in the Chesterfield Airport Industrial Park in Chesterfield County, Virginia, and has held a public hearing thereon on February 17, 1987; and WHEREAS, the Authority has requested the Board of Supervisors (the Board) of the County of Chesterfield, Virginia (the County), to approve the issuance of the Bonds to comply with Section 147(f) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended; and WHEREAS, a copy of the Authority's resolution approving the issuance of the Bonds, subject to terms to be agreed upon, a record of the public hearing and a "fiscal impact statement" with respect to the Project have been filed with the Board; BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD, VIRGINIA: 1. The Board of Supervisors of the County of Chesterfield, Virginia, approves the issuance of the Bonds by the Industrial Development Authority of the County of Chesterfield for the benefit of Linwood R. Lucord, Jr., to the extent required by said Section 147(f), to permit the Authority to assist in the financ- ing of the Project. 2. The approval of the issuance of the Bonds, as required by Section 147(f), does not constitute an en- dorsement of the Bonds or the creditworthiness of the Applicant, but, as required by Section 15.1-1380 of the Code of Virginia of 1950, as amended, the Bonds shall provide that neither the County nor the Authority shall be obligated to pay the Bonds or the interest thereon or other costs incident thereto except from the revenues and moneys pledged therefor, and neither the faith or credit nor the taxing power of the Commonwealth, the County nor the Authority shall be pledged thereto. 3. The Board hereby authorizes and directs the County Administrator of the County to make application on behalf of the Applicant to the Allocation Administrator, pursuant to Executive Order No. 28 (86) issued by the Governor of Virginia, for an allocation from the State Allocation for the Project, in accordance with the pro- visions of said Executive Order. 4. This resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption. -2- CERTIFICATE The undersigned Secretary of the Industrial Development Authority of the County of Chesterfield (the Authority) hereby certifies as follows: 1. A meeting of the Authority was duly called and held on February 17, 1987, at 3:30 o'clock p.m. in the Board Room at the Chesterfield County Airport Terminal Building, Chesterfield, Virginia. The meeting was open to the public, and persons of differing views were given an opportunity to be heard. At such meeting all of the Directors of the Authority were present or absent throughout as follows: PRESENT: William F. Seymour, III James A. Spencer Thomas Steger Knox W. Ramsey ABSENT: Curtis C. Duke Gary W. Fenchuk Robert L. R. Goyne, Jr. 2. The Chairman announced the commencement of a public hearing on the application of Linwood R. Lucord, Jr., and that a notice of the hearing was published once a week for two consecutive weeks, the first publication being not more than 28 days nor less than 14 days prior to the hearing in a newspaper having general circulation in the County of Chesterfield, Virginia (the Notice). A copy of the Notice and a certificate of publication of such Notice have been filed.with the records the Authority: of the Authority and are attached hereto as Exhibit A. The following individuals appeared and addressed R. Hart Lee Linwood R. Lucord, Jr. A reasonably detailed summary of their statements together with the fiscal impact statement required by the Industrial Development Revenue Bond Act is attached hereto as Exhibits B and C. 4. Attached hereto as Exhibit D is a true, correct and complete copy of a resolution (the Resolution) adopted at such meeting of the Authority by a majority of the Directors present at such meeting, with the ayes and nays being recorded in the minutes of such meeting as follows: Director William F. Seymour, III James A. Spencer Thomas Steger Knox W. Ramsey Vote Aye Aye Aye Aye The Resolution constitutes all formal action taken by the Authority at such meeting relating to matters referred to in the Resolution. The Resolution has not been repealed, revoked, rescinded or amended and is in full force and effect on the date hereof. -2- WITNESS my hand and the seal of the Authority this 17th day of February, 1987. Secra~r~, ~d~st~r~-al ~~p~ent Authority o~f~the Co~t~ of Chesterfield (SEAL) A - Copy of Notice, Certified by Newspaper B - Summaries of Statements C - Fiscal Impact Statement D - Inducement Resolution -3- Exhibit A INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF THE COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD (Linwood R. Lucord Project) [ INDUIi, TRIAL Jr., vd#~l- I~'#1¢#)ml INIC~ of I:IUll ~~~1~,2112 ~ ~ A~ ~ mon~, Vlrglnl~ 23230 (the ~, ~ tO~l~ ~ ~ (~ ~) m m 17,~ ~ to~ ~ ~ =.m. ~ ~ 17,1 m--~t~I~l ~ i. A c~y ot I~l My Co~ Publisher oi' THE RICHMOND TIMES-DISPATCH Ciri:il lq~r~ _7. ' This is to certify that the attached was published in The Richmond Time,~-Dispatch, a newspaper published in the City of Richmond. State of Virginia. FEB ~1987 FEB 1 ~ 1987 FEB 3 1987 (/['-~"e lrst ineertion being giYen .......................................................... I t~Flsu~hs~iJ3~l.before me ' -- I State ofVirgini~ichmond:I ~ ~I~~'~-':~::' .................. ~i~'~ ................... Exhibit B INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF THE COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD Application of Linwood R. Lucord, Jr. Summary of Statements at Public Hearinq R. Hart Lee, an attorney with Williams, Mullen, Christian & Dobbins, P.C., counsel for Mr. Lucord and proposed bond counsel for the issue, introduced himself and Mr. Lucord and described the proposed bond financing for a manufacturing facility to be leased to Feed Water Systems, Inc., Mr. Lucord's company. Mr. Lee described the relationship of the bond-financed plant to the adjacent administrative and sales offices, which would also be used by Feed Water Systems, as well as by Berkness Control and Equipment Corporation, an affiliate company. The current federal tax law on industrial development bonds prescribes that only "manufacturing facilities" be financed, and Mr. Lucord's financing has been structured so that the pro- ceeds of the Authority's bonds are used only to pay for the manufacturing portion of the entire facility. Mr. Lucord described the operations to be carried on in the financed facility, including the manufacturing and assembly- lng of water treatment systems and the processing of water from customers to remove waste materials. Mr. Lucord described the scope of his company's business and significant customers. Exhibit C FISCAL IMPACT STATEMENT February 17, 1987 Date Linwood R. Lucord, Jr. Applicant Manufacturing Plant for Water Treatment Systems (Feed Water Systems, Inc., Lessee) Facility Maximum amount of financing sought Estimated taxable value of the facility's real property to be constructed in the municipality Estimated real property tax per year using present tax rates Estimated personal property tax per year using present tax rates Estimated merchants' capital tax per year using present tax rates Estimated dollar value per year of goods and services that will be purchased locally Estimated number of regular employees on year round basis Average annual salary per employee 650,000 800,000 8,320 5,253 N/A 186,000 25-30 24,000 William F. Seymour, III Authority Chairman INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF THE COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD Name or Authority ECODEV/INDUSTRIAL DEV AUTHORITY/jac 2O Exhibit D RESOLUTION OF THE INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF THE COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD REGARDING INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT REVENUE BONDS OR NOTES FOR THE PURPOSE OF FINANCING A FACILITY TO BE LOCATED IN THE COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD, VIRGINIA WHEREAS, the Industrial Development Authority of the County of Chesterfield (the "Authority") is empowered by the Industrial Development and Revenue Bond Act (the "Act") to issue its revenue bonds or notes for the purpose of promoting industry, developing trade and inducing industrial and commercial enterprises to locate in or remain in this Commonwealth, for the benefit of the inhabitants of this Commonwealth and for the increase of their commerce, and to promote the safety, health, welfare, convenience, and prosperity of the citizens of Virginia; WHEREAS, the Authority has received a request from Linwood R. Lucord, Jr. (the "Applicant"), dated January 20, 1987, requesting that the Authority issue its revenue bonds or notes to assist in the financing of the acquisition of land and construction and equipping of a manufacturing facility (the "Project") on land located in the County of Chesterfield, Virginia (the "County"); WHEREAS, the Project will be leased to and operated by Feed Water Systems, Inc., a Virginia corporation (the "Company"), controlled by the Applicant; WHEREAS, preliminary plans for the acquisition, construction and equipping of the Project have been described to the Authority by a representative of the Applicant; WHEREAS, after due publication of notice as required by the Act, the Authority has held a public hearing on the issuance of the Bonds, as required by the Act; WHEREAS, after careful study of the nature of the aforesaid undertaking, the Authority has determined that such assistance will induce the Applicant to locate its facility in the County and to create and maintain jobs and employment and thereby benefit the inhabitants of the County and the Commonwealth of Virginia, either through the increase of their commerce, or through the promotion of their safety, health, welfare, convenience or prosperity; WHEREAS, the estimated cost of the acquisition, construction and equipping of the Project and certain expenses of issue will require an issue of revenue bonds or notes in the aggregate principal amount not to exceed $650,000. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF THE COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD: 1. It is hereby found and determined that the acquisition, construction and equipping of the Project will be in the public interest of the County, will bring additional revenues and employment into the County and will benefit the County and the -2- Commonwealth of Virginia and its inhabitants through the increase of their commerce or through the promotion of their safety, health, welfare, convenience or prosperity. 2. To induce the Applicant and the Company to locate the Project in the County, the Authority hereby agrees to assist the Applicant in every reasonable way to finance the acquisition, construction and equipping of the Project and to undertake the issuance of its industrial development revenue bonds or notes in an amount not to exceed $650,000 (the "Bonds") upon terms and conditions mutually agreeable to the Authority and the Applicant. The Project shall be sold to the Applicant under an installment sales agreement or deed of assumption with payments sufficient to pay interest on and premium (if any) and principal of the Bonds. The Bonds will be issued pursuant to documents satisfactory to the Authority and a Trustee (or the purchaser of the Bonds) which will set forth the form and terms of the Bonds and which will mortgage the Project and either assign the Authority's rights to payments under the installment sales agreement to the Trustee (or the purchaser of the Bonds) or provide for the assumption by the Applicant of the Authority's obligation to pay the principal of and premium (if any) and interest on the Bonds for the benefit of the bondholders. The Applicant shall in turn lease the Project to the Company, under a net lease with payments sufficient to pay principal of and -3- premium (if any) and interest on the Bonds, which lease shall also be assigned to the Trustee (or the purchaser of the Bonds) for the benefit of bondholders. Such Bonds shall be issued after the Authority has received the approving opinion of Bond Counsel as to the qualification of the Bonds under the Act. 3. It having been represented to the Authority that it is necessary to proceed immediately with the planning of the acquisition, construction and equipping of the Project, the Authority hereby agrees that the Applicant may proceed to develop further plans for the acquisition, construction and equipping of the Project, enter into contracts for the construction of and acquisition of materials and equipment for the Project, and take such other steps, including interim borrowing, as the Applicant may deem appropriate in connection therewith, including the location of a purchaser or purchasers for the Bonds, provided that nothing herein shall be deemed to authorize the Applicant to obligate the Authority without its consent in each instance to the payment of any moneys or the performance of any acts in connection with the Project. The Authority agrees that the Applicant may be reimbursed from the proceeds of the Bonds for all expenditures so made and costs so incurred by it, insofar as such expenditures and costs are properly reimbursable under the Act and other applicable state and federal laws. -4- 4. In connection with the issuance of the Bonds, if necessary, the Authority shall accept from or on behalf of the Applicant conveyance of parcels of or easements on land in the County on which the Project is or is to be located. The officers of the Authority are hereby authorized and directed to accept and have recorded a proper deed or deeds in connection with such conveyance. If for any reason the Bonds are not issued, it is understood that the Authority shall reconvey any such property or easements to or on behalf of the Applicant without cost other than the expense of preparation and recordation of such deed or deeds of conveyance, which costs shall be paid by the Applicant. 5. The Authority hereby appoints Williams, Mullen, Christian & Dobbins, P.C., of Richmond, Virginia, as Bond Counsel to supervise the proceedings and approve the issuance of the Bonds. It is the judgment of the Authority that, in the public interest, the services of Bond Counsel should not be acquired through competitive bidding. 6. All costs and expenses in connection with the financing and the acquisition, construction and equipping of the Project, including the fees and expenses of the Authority, Bond Counsel, Authority counsel and advisory architectural consultant, if any, shall be paid from the proceeds of the Bonds or from other funds provided by the Applicant. If for any -5- reason such Bonds are not issued, it is understood that all such expenses shall be paid by the Applicant and that the Authority shall have no responsibility therefor. 7. This resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption and shall remain in full force and effect, unless sooner modified, extended or rescinded by resolution of the Authority, until the first meeting of the Authority held more than one year from the date of adoption of this resolution. 8. By adoption of this resolution, the Authority intends to take "official action" towards the issuance of the Bonds within the meaning of Section 147(f) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, and applicable regulations thereunder. 9. The Authority hereby recommends that the Board of Supervisors of the County of Chesterfield, Virginia (the "Board'.), approve the issuance of the Bonds. -6- CHESTERFI ELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AG E NDA MEETING DATE: February 25, 1987 ITEM NUMBER: ll.D.4. SUB4ECT: Consideration of an Agreement Permitting Greater Richmond Transit Corporation to Operate Within the County and Waiving the Requirements of a Third Party Surety Bond COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION' ATTACHMENTS: YES~. NO [] The State Corporation Commission ("SCC") has determined that state law requires the Greater Richmond Transit Corporation ("GRTC") to supply the SCC with a liability bond as a condition to providing service-in or through the counties adjacent to the City of Richmond. GRTC provides service in the County under route approval granted by the SCC within a Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity. GRTC is currently self-insured for liability claims and cannot obtain third party insurance coverage at an economically practical price. The SCC will waive the bond requirement if GRTC enters into contractual agreements with Chesterfield and Henrico in which both counties agree to allow GRTC to operate within the counties and to protect against liability claims through a self-insurance program. The attached agreement authorizes GRTC to continue to traverse the County for certain City routes and to provide services on the same routes as exist today. The agreement does not provide for operating subsidies and either party may revoke the agreement upon thirty (30) days written notice. The agree- ment does not create any liability risks to the County that do not already exist today. Steven L. Micas County Attorney cd11109:85C16 SIGNATURE: '/COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR Agenda Item February 25, 1987 Page 2 The current GRTC Certificate expires on March 1, 1987 and if the Board declines to enter into the agreement GRTC will be required to either purchase liability insurance at an expensive price or, more likely, discontinue service in Chesterfield. Recommendation: Authorize execute the attached agreement. the County Administrator to cd11109:85C16 AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT made this day of . ~ , 1987 between GREATER RICEMOND TRANSIT CCMPANY ("GRTC"), a Virginia public service corporation with its principal office located at 900 East Broad Street, Richmond, Virginia and the COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD, VIRGINIA ("the County"), a political subdivision of the Commonwealth of Virginia. WI TNT S SET~{: WHEREAS, GRTC has been authorized by the State Corporation Commission ("SCC") to operate a passenger service along those routes and to those points within the County that are set forth in Appendix A, which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference; and WHEREAS, GRTC desires to enter into a contract with the County to operate passenger service along the aforesaid routes and to the aforesaid points pursuant to the provisions of Sec. 56-274(11), Code of Virginia, as amended, and to thereby eliminate the necessity to maintain its Certificates of Public Convenience and Necessity with the SCC regarding the aforesaid routes and points; and WHEREAS, the County is empowered to enter into this Agree- ment pursuant to Sec. 15.1-526.2 of the Code of Virginia (1950), as amended; and WHEREAS, the Chairman of the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors has been authorized to enter into this Agreement by the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors; and WHEREAS, GRTC'S Board has authorized GRTC's President and General Counsel to enter into this Agreement; NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises and obligations of each as hereinafter set forth, it is mutually agreed as follows: 1. GRTC shall be permitted to provide bus passenger service along those routes and to those points in the County as set forth in Appendix A, which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, and will not totally eliminate service along such routes without first complying with the provisions of paragraph 5 of this Agreement. 2. In order to provide satisfactory services, GRTC shall provide, operate and maintain buses suitable for such operation. GRTC shall also provide the personnel to operate and maintain the buses, and GRTC shall have full control over and be responsible for the hiring and supervision cf such personnel as well as for the payment of all salaries an~ wages, workmen's compensation and all other employee benefits of ~such personnel. Further, GRTC shall provide public liabilit~~ ~r~.d damage self-insurance in the same manner as GRTC is sel f- i~'.~u~r ed for its non-County opera- tions, for the operations here~.~3er. It is the intention of the parties that, in the undertakf~a~,~ herein described, GRTC shall be an independent contractor. G.~5~C ~.~hall be liable for any neg- ligent acts or omissions and all claims, damages, costs and expenses, resulting in bodily injuries or death of persons or damages to or destruction of property, or for any other cause, resulting from or arising out of GRTC's performance and its operation of the aforesaid passenger service under this Agree- men t. 3. The County, by entering into this Agreement, incurs no obligation other than to permit GRTC to use the designated routes to provide bus passenger service as set forth herein. 4. Other than providing the bus service in the manner and to the extent described, GRTC shall have no responsibility for the creation, maintenance or upkeep on any parking facilities related, or that may be related, to this service. 5. Either party shall have the right to terminate this Agreement by giving thirty (30) days' written notice to the other party of its intention to do so, provided, however, that GRTC may reduce such service immediately upon written notice to the County that GRTC does not have sufficient fuel to perform its obliga- tions herein. GRTC's determination as to whether it has suffi- cient fuel shall be final. 6. No waiver, alteration, or modification of any of the provisions hereof shall be binding unless in writing and signed by a duly authorized representative of GRTC and the County. Except as herein expressly provided to the contrary, the provi- sions of this Agreement are for the benefit of the parties hereto and are not for the benefit of any other person. This agreement shall not be assigned by either party without the prior written consent of the other party. 7. All notices permitted or required to be made pursuant to this Agreement (unless a different address or addressee is desig- nated in writing by the president of GRTC or the Chairman of the County Board, as the case may be) shall be sent to Mr. Henry C. Church, General Manager, Greater Richmond Transit Company, P.O. Box 27323, Richmond, Virginia 23261 on behalf of GRTC and to Mr. Richard Sale, Assistant County Administrator for Development at P.O. Box 40, Chesterfield, Virginia 23839~ on behalf of the County. 8. This Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the Commonwealth of Virginia. The undersigned represent that they have authority to execute this Agreement on behalf of the respec- tive parties. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused their names to be signed to this Agreement, by their duly authorized officers. Attest: GREATER RICHMOND TRANSIT COMPANY General Counsel Attest: President COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD County Clerk Chairman, Board of Supervisors APPENDIX A Description of Routes in Chesterfield County (a) Beginning on Petersburg Turnpike (U.S. Route No. 1) at the point where the 1942 corporation line of the City of Richmond crosses said turnpike and running southwardly along said turnpike to a point approximately 7/10th of a mile to the south gate of the duPont Plant, thence returning over the same route to the point of beginning. (b) From the city limits of the City of Richmond along Forest Hill Avenue to Virginia Route 147 (Huguenot Road) in Chesterfield County to the intersection of Virginia Route 147 and Old Gun Road, re-entering the City of Richmond at the intersection of Virginia Route 147 and Old Gun Road, and serving that area of the city. On the return trip, from the city limits at Stony Point Road and Virginia Route 147 (Huguenot Road) to Buford Road in Chesterfield County, along Buford Road to Forest Hill Avenue to the Richmond city limits. (c) From the corporate limits of the City of Richmond via Jefferson Davis Highway to Goolsby Avenue to Pembroke Street to Cogbill Road to Jefferson Davis Highway to the corporate limits of the City of Richmond. STATE CORPORATION COMMISSION CERTIFICATE OF PUBLIC CONVENIENCE AND NECESSI~ NUMBER hereby au~ho~ze~ ~o ~utni~h service, by means o[ motor propelle~ vehicles between: ~TS BH0~ IN APP~IDIX A ~TT.~C~ %'0 ~{D ~btDE A PMIT OF THIS C~TIFICATE in accordance with Time Schedules and TarifJs o/rates or fares and charges on file with the Commis. sion, and subject to conditions and limitations noted below' CONDITIONS: All motor vehicles operated under ,and by virtue and authority of this Certificate must be operateJ Title 56, Code of Virginia, and applicable rules and regulation in accordance with Chapter 12 of the State Corporation Commission. LIMITATIONS: Dated at Richmoz~d, Va. (This is a transfer previously hold by ¥1rgiula Transit Company ~ cancollation of Certificates P-i~,., p-1449, P-196J, P-196~ ~ P 2116) of certificates STATE CORPORATION COMMISSION By PRESTON C. SHANNON Com,nisdo.er 0 t A~a~ A COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA STATE CORPORATION COMMISSION RICHMOND APPENDIX A Description of routes - Certificate No. p-2~46 . ~C~ ~r~Rictimo.d~nLa~eslde Avenue, northwardly along akeside Avenue to mllX d Woodman Road, alo~g-~oO~mgRoad to Vernon ~oa~, ~) ~' along Vernon Road to Hermi~ge Road, along 0~ Hermitage Road to Llnbrook Drive, along L~b~ook B]~/~O 0rive to Hill~rd Road, along Hi~iar~ Road to Woo~row Tarrace,'~'~tong Woo~row Terrace to ~ple- wood Avenue,.along ~plewoo~ Avenue to---Cedar Croft Street, along Oeaar Croft Street %o D~barton... Avenu~.,-'along D~barton Avenue to ~kesi~e Avenue an~..southwar~ly along ~esi4e Avenue ~o the po~t'-. ~/begi~ing. (b) Begging at the corporate l~its of the 0ity of Ric~ona and Meadowbriage Roa~, thence along Meadowbridge Road to the ~in Gate of the Gro~4s of Atlantic R~al ~positlon, Incorporate~, at Lab~n~ Avenue (He~lco Co~[y), and ret~ning along ~b~'n~ Avenue to Ric~on~-Henrico Turnp~e [o ~he Ric~ona City l~its. LI MITAT I0N ~ (The passenger Ous service herein authorizea ls no~ =o be continuous to ann from said exposition gro~s, bun i% Is to be ~intaine~ an~ opera,ca merely ~o proviae reasonably adequate transportation to patrons a~ten~ing events within ~he exposition gro~as of Atlantic R~al ~position, Incorporated, at such t~es as such events a~e actually in progress). (c) ~eginnlng on Petersb~g T~npike (U. S. Route N~I) at the peri where the 1942 corporation l~e of City of Ric~ond crosses said t~np~e and r~ning sou~hwaraly along sal~ ~npike to a po~t approx- d~ont P~nt, thence re~nxng ever =ne s~e to ~he po~ of begi~lng. / LIMITATION: / (Provided that %his certificate ann the o~aer . { authorizing the same s~ll no~ in any ~nner b=~ construe~ as limiting, d~ls~, or ~pair~n~ any of ~he rights now held by Caroli~ Coach Comp~ of ~lrg~la ~der any exis~g certificates; nor s~ll this cer~lfica%e be transferable =o anyone / other t~n the holder, present or furze, of the / City of Ric~on4's franc~se for passenger bus / service: nor shall ibis certificate ever become / ~ar% of, or be usea as a basis for, any o[here~0 .artificate route or right by this or any otb concern or carrier). ' COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA STATE CORPORATION COMMISSION RICHMOND Page 2- Bet~'een Pilots Lane and Richmond City Limits in Henrico County, Virginia, thence along pilots Lane to Laburnum Aver, me, along Laburnum Avenue to Ricl~mond City Limits, and returninE over same routing to point of beginnix~. Between City of Richmond and Lakeside area in Henrico ,-~o~y, us~g Rlc~ond-Pe~ersb~ ~.~npike, over fol- :~.a~-~ow~ router From Interc~nge 15 along ~keside Avenue (Route 161), alo~ Hllliard Road (Route 356), alon= Woodrow Terrace, along ~plewood Avenue, along Cedar Croft Street, alo~ D=barton Avenue, along ~Xeside Avenue and In~erc~nge 15. Begging at the City l~its of Ric~o~ on Cary Street Road (Route 157), thence along Cary $treet Road to River Road, thence,River Road to ~he River Road Shoppi~ Center, thence via Cary Street Road (Route 1~7)~ to the City limits · (g) Fz~om Stapl~s ~iill I~oad and Mon~,)nt Avenu~ in the City ~.~.~,: ~ ~9~ Ric~ond, westward along ~n~en~ Avenue ~o~,ty to Wlllo~ La~n Drive, along l~illcw ~n Drive '~'yth~ Avenue, along Wy~he Av~ae to B~d Avenue, along Byrd Avenue to ~,~onm-~ent Zv.~n',~.~ an,~ return alor~ ~on~ent Avenue to the City l~its. (h) From Broad Stree~ Road and Richmond City Limits (Route Nu. 250), He~'~lco Co~ty, Virginia, thence along Broad Street Road ~o Willow ~wn Drive, thence ~ou~hwardly ~lo~g Willow ~-~a Drive ~ ~rXel Road~ thence west- mardly along ~rk~l Road %o B~d Avenue~ thence '~a~'diy along Byx'd Avenue to Fitzh~h Avenue, ~hence eastwardly alo~ Fitzhugh A~enue $o Willow ~n Drive, thence n,r%hwardly ca Willow ~wn Drive ~o ~oad S~reet Road~ thence e~stwardly on Broad Stree~ Road to the City l~its. (i) ~ He~lCo Co~ty: From the ~terseetion of B~d ~ AVenue and Mo~en~ Avenue westward along Mon~ent ,k~ Avenue to Llbbie Avenue, left on Libbie Avenue to D~am Btreet, right on D~ Street to Bremo Road, right on Bremo Bead to ~ent Avenue, east a~ng Mon~ent ~ck to B~d Street. (J) ~ Ee~ico Co~ty~ From the intersection of ~n~ent ~/~[~[[~oAvenue a~ Peachtree Boulevard, northward on P~chtree' Boulevard to Yitzhugh Avenue, westward on Fitzhugh Avenue to Libb[e Avenue, southward on LibBie Avenue ~~[~O to the ~tersectiom of ~n~ent and Libbie Avenues, rejoining present rou~e. COMMONWEALTH OF' VIRGINIA STATE: CORI~)RATION COMMISSION RICHMOND APPEI'IDIX A In Hem'lco CountT~ From the ~ntersect~on of 2j&rd Street and the R~c~ond CSty-H~co ~o~ty north a~o~ 2~rd ~treet to Coo~ ~ne~ ~est a~on~ Coo~ ~ne to 2~st ~treet, a~ re~n south alon~ ~e. STATE CORPORATION COMMi$51ON CERTi FI CATE OF PUBLIC' CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY NUMBER-- P-2542 GREATER RZCHNOND TRANS[T COMPAN¥ RICHMOND, VIRGINIA (P. O. Box 27323) (Zip 23261)______. hereby ~uthor~zed to ~urnhh PASSENGER service, by '.means o] motor propelled vehicles From the city limits of the City of Richmond along Forest Hill Avenue to Virginia Route 147 (Huguenot Road) in Chesterfield County to the intersection of Virginia Route 147 and Old Gun Road, re-entering the City of Richmond at the intersection of Virginia Route 147 and Old Gun Road, and serving that area of the city. On the -eturn trip, from the city limits at Stony Point Road and Virginia Route 147 (Huguenot t,ad) to Buford Road in Chesterfield County, along Buford Road to Forest Hill Avenue to the Richmond city limits. in accordance with' Time Schedules and Tar~ff.r o/rates ov ]ares and charges on file with the Commit- sion, and subject to conditions and limitations noted below: CONDITIONS: All motor vehicles operated under and by v~rtue and authority of this Certificate must be oper,:~ted in accordance with Chapter 12 Title 56, Code of Virginia, and applicable rules and regulations o] the State Corporation Commission. LIMITATIONS: No passenger shall be picked up or discharged at any point in Chesterfield County except along Virginia Route 147 (Huguenot Road) (Order in Case No. MCS810008, dated May 5, 1981, amended limitation allowing pickup and discharge along Virginia Route 147 (Huguenot Road)) Dated at Richmond, Va. May 1 S, 'sis certificate Cancels Certificate P-2541. STATE CORPORATION COMMISSION' By I~i~'$'1'0~ ¢' ~t)1~ GO I O W ^L'rH ov cERTIFICATE OF PUBLIC CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY P-2501 NUMBER- GREATER RIC/H4OND TRANSIT COMPANY Richmond. Virginia PASS;-NGE~ ---- is hereby authorized to furnish service, by means of motor propelled vehicles ~: From the corporate limits of the Richmona. via Edgelawn. thence via Henrico Arms Place. and thence via Darbytown Road to the corporate limits of the City of Richmond. m accordance with Time Schedules and Tariffs of rates or fares and charges on file with the Commis- sion, and subject to conditions and limitations noted below: CONDITIONS: All motor vehicles operated under and by virtue and authority o! this Certificate must be operated in accordance with Chapter 12 Titie 5 6, Code of Virginia, and applicable rules and regulations ol the State Corporation Commission. LIMITATIONS: Dated at Richmond, Va. auxy 3o. ]9 v_L 6 STATI~ CORPORAIION COMMISSION PRESTON C. SHANNON By Co,,,nis.Ho"er STATE CORPORATION COMMISSION CERTIFICATE OF PUBLIC CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY NUMBER is hereby autho~zed to ]urnhh Pa~-~mt~r service, by means of motor propelled vehicles~t~. A~ to P~rek~ S~ ~o ~gb~ ~ ~o Jefferson ~c~ in accordance with Time Schedules and TarffJs of rates or fa~es and charges on file with the Commit,, sion, and subject to conditions and limitations noted below: CONDITIONS: All motor vehicles operated under and by v~tue and authority of this Certificate must be operated in a~eordance with Chapter 12 Title 56, Code o/Virginia, and applicable rules and regulation.; of the State Corporation Commission. LIbIITATIONS: Dated at Richmond, Va. r,~r.~r 110. 197~ _. STATE CORPORATION COMMISSION l~7.$'l'0tl C. Stlat~0U GREATER RICHMOND TRANSIT COMPANY Agreement .Amending paragraph 2 on pages 2 and 3 2. In order to provide satisfactory services, GRTC shall provide, operate and maintain buses suitable for such operation. GRTC shall also provide the personnel to operate and maintain the buses, and GRTC shall have full control over and be responsible for the hiring and supervision of such personnel as well as for the payment of all salaries and wages, workmen's compensation and all other employee benefits of such personnel. Further, GRTC shall provide public liability and damage self-insurance in the same manner as GRTC is self-insured for its non-County operations, for the operations hereunder. Annually no later than February 1, GRTC agrees to supply the County with documentation indicating the manner in which it will fund and manage its self-insurance program during the succeeding year. It is the intention of the parties that, in the undertaking herein described, GRTC shall be an independent contractor and that this contract shall not create any third party beneficiaries with any legally enforceable rights. GRTC shall be liable for any negli- gent acts or omissions and all claims, damages, costs and ex- penses, resulting in bodily injuries or death of persons or damages to or destruction of property, or for any other cause, resulting from or arising out of GRTC's performance and its operation of the aforesaid passenger service under this Agree- ment. /cd11122:86C30 CHESTERFI ELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA MEETING DATE: February 25~ 1987 SUBJECT: State Road Acceptance ITEM NUMBER: 11. E. 1. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION DALE DISTRICT: . Kings Forest, Section 9 and a portion of Sections 10 and 3 MATOACA DISTRICT: A Portion of Chesterfield Meadows Drive ATTACHMENTS: YES I~ NO [] SIGNATURE: R'~chAr~ M/~:'Hc~,lfish, P.E. Director Environmental Engineering ddu'~T~' ADMINISTRATOR MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: SUBJECT: MEETING DATE: Board of Supervisors Environmental Engineering State Road Acceptance - Kings Forest, Section 9 and a portion of Sections 10 and 3 February 25, 1987 Manuel Street: Beginning at the intersection with Canute Drive, State Route 2828, and running southerly to the inter- section with Thierry Street, then continuing southerly to the intersection with Manuel Court, then continuing southerly to the intersection with Doriu$ Drive, then continuing southerly to end in a dead end. Manuel Court: Beginning at the intersection with Manuel Street and running westerly to end in a cul-de-sac. Dorius Drive: Beginning at the intersection with Manuel Street and running westerly to tie into existing Dorius Drive, State Route 2805. KINGS FOREST SECTION 9 ~ o portion of SECTIONS I0 I~ $ MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: SUBJECT: MEETING DATE: Board of Supervisors Environmental Engineering State Road Acceptance - A Portion of Chesterfield Meadows Drive February 25, 1987 Chesterfield Meadows Drive: Beginning at the intersection with Iron Bridge Road, State Rouqe 10, and running easterly to tie into existing Chesterfield Meadows Drive in Wrexham Estates Phase I. CHESTERFI ELD MEADOWS DRIVE CHESTERFI ELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA L. MEETING DATE: SUBJECT: February 25, 1987 ITEM NUMBER: ll.E.2. Request by Bensley-Bermuda Volunteer Rescue Squad to Amend 1987 Bingo Permit COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The Bensley-Bermuda Volunteer Rescue Squad has submitted a request to amend its 1987 bingo permit to change the day on which its bingo games are held from Friday to Wednesday. Under Virginia law, a bingo permit is valid at the location, time and day of the week indicated in the application and subsequently approved by the Board. Because the Board issues the original bingo permit and is responsible for its regulation, the Board must authorize a change in the terms of the permit. Staff has reviewed this request and determined that it meets statutory requirements. Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Board of Supervi- sors approve the rescue squad's request to change the day of its bingo games from Friday to Wednesday night. ATTACHMENTS: YES ~ NO I-I PREPARED BY;,.~'~''t''''~ ~ Steven L. Micas County Attorney cd11108:85C16 SIGNATURE: C/O'UNTY ~.DMIN! STRATOR /- BENSLEY BERMVr A VOL. RESCV SQUAD P. O. BOX 657 PIt. 748-6122 CHESTER. VA. 23831 February 11, 1987 Mr. Richard Hedrick County Administrator Chesterfield County Post Office Box 40 Chesterfield, VA 23832 Dear Mr. H~dr.ick~ Bensley-Bermuda Volunteer Rescue Squad wou].d like to amend our Bingo Permit to reflect a change in the day of the week. The reason for this request is due to our reorganization of the game. Bensley Rescue Squad requested in our old Permit Request to operate on Friday nights at 7:00pm. We have yet to begin to operate our game on that evening. Our new coordinator has decided that Wednesday evenings are the best day of the week in this area due to a lack of Bingo games being played on that day. Bensley wishes to began to operate our Bingo games on evening at 7:00pm once the Bosrd of Supervisors have this request. An early reply is greatly appreciated. Wednesdoy approved If you have any questions hesitate to ca|l. concerning this matter, please do not Sincerely, L) /~ L' .~, Stan Orchet President CHESTERFI ELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGE NDA MEET lNG DATE: SUBJECT: February 25, 1987 ITEM NUMBER: Request for Bingo/Raffle Permit ll.E.3. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION The County Attorney's Office has reviewed the following application for a raffle permit and has determined that the application meets all statutory requirements: Organization Type Year Future Homemakers of America (Monacan High School) Raffle 1987 ATTACHMENTS: YES I-I Steven L. Micas County Attorney SIGNATURE: "COUNTY ADMI NISTRATOR APPLICATION FOR A PERMIT TO CONDUCT BINGO GAMES OR RAFFLES The undersigned applicant, pursuant to Section 18.2-340·1, et. see. of the Code of Virainia, 1950, emended, ~fequests the Board of Supervisors_of Chesterfield County to issue a permit to conduct ~nga games raffles;V__, or both during the [~;~/7 calendar year· This application is for a new i~ or renewal . permit. In support of this application, the applicant offers the following information under oath: 1. A. Proper name of organization: B, C. Address of organization's headquarters: ~-~a~,_~ "3 ~-% [[.~o ! ~'~'~o~'~'r,~'~ Add,ess where all records ef receipts and disbursements are pemanently filed: Name and address'of owner of the property described in C above: E..Address or ~ddresses where'b~3zg~ill be held or raffle drawings conducted: NOTE: THIS PERMIT IS VALID ONLY AT THE ABOVE LOCATION. F. Dates or days of week and times of day when ~;: or raffles will be held at above address or addresses: '~'~rC.~[ ~j '1~ ~"~/ . G. Time patrons are admitted and sales begin: }~C~%~.. I --- ~i~ 2. A. Date when organization was founded: ~'~(CC_ ~[^~ B. Has your organization been in existence and met regularly in Chesterfield County for two years immediately prior to making this application? Yes ~ No . C. Is your organization currently and has. your organization always been operated in the past as a non- profit organization? Yes /~ Nc . D. Internal Revenue Code section under which tax-exempt stat~s was granted {if applicable): ~.~ ~ , E· Organization's Taxpayer Identification Number: ~'~-_ F. State the specific type and purpose of your organization: 3. If this application is for renewal of a permit, answer A and B below, Were financial reports filed on time and in compliance with applicable legal requirements? Yes__No . Gross receipts from all sources related to the operation of bingo games or instant bingo by calendar quarter for the 12 month period immediately prior to the date of this application: 1st quarter 2nd quarter 4th quarter Officers of Organization: Secretary: ~(2_ ;3~3 . 3rd Quarter Address II 5m Member authorized within the organization to be responsible for conducting and operation of bingo games~ or raffles: Home Telephone Number :~?0 I~r?~.. Business Telephone Number: 7~/~-'~-~ · 6. Do you, each officer, director and member of the organization fully understand each of the following: Am It is a violation of law to enter into a contract with any person,' firm, association, organizatio!'~ [other than another qualified organization pursuant to Section 18.2-340.13 of the Code Virginia), partnership or corporation of any classification whatsoever, for the purpose of organiz? ing, mynaging or conducting bingo games or raffles? Yes ~ No . Bm The organization must maintain and file with the County Internal Audit Department complete recordi~ of receipts and disbursements pertaining to bingo games and raffles as required by State and Country law, a~/~'that such records are subject to audit by the County Internal Audit Department? Yes No C. The organization must remit an audit fee of 1% of gross receipts with the Annual Financial Repo~ not later than November I unless gross receipts are less than SE,O00? Yes '~/ No . Dm The organization must furnish a complete list of its membership upon the request of the Internal Audit Department or other designated representative of the Board of Supervisors? Yes ty/ No . Coun~~ Any organization found in violation of Section 18.2-340.10 of the Code of Virginia authorizing thi~J permit is subject to having such permit revoked and.'any organization or person, shareholder, agent,. member or employee of such organization who violated Section 18.2-340.10 or Article 1.1 of Chapte,- 8 of Title 18.2 of the Code of Virginia may be guilty of a felony? Yes V/ No . 7. Has your organization attached to this application each of the following? A copy of the organization's charter, articles of incorporation, bylaws, and other legal document.~ which describe the specific purposes for which the organization is chartered or organized? Yes ~ No . A copy of a resolution of thy. organization's board of' directors authorizing the undersigned apply for this permit? Yes~/ No · . A chec~ in the amount of ~25.00 payable to Treasurer, Chesterfield County as an application fee? Yes ~ No . D. Additional pages where necessary to fully complete this application? Yes / No . 8. Have you and each officer of your organization read the attached permit and do you a~ each of you agr~e on behalf of the organization to comply with each of the conditions therein? Yes_~__ No . I hereby swear or affirm under the penalties of perjury.as set forth in Section 18.2-434 of the Code ~:~[ Virginia, that all the above questions have been completely answered and that all the statements here~i~ are true to the best of my knowledge, information and beliefs. WITNESS the following signatures and seals: Signature of Applicant ) / '/. STATE OF VTRGTNIA COUNTY OF [~ESTERFIELD Title I, ~-t~'~-L~l~ ,~ Notary Public in and for .the County and State aforesaid, do here~y cert~jfy tha~/ ~ ~ ~(~(~r(~(]t~l~i~)capacity ' DH~ organization and whose ,ame ,s signed to the foregoing appeared before me this ~ay acknowledged, subscribed ~nd swore the same before me in the jurisdiction aforesaid. Given under My Commission Expires: ~ ~ ~otery Public CO~STITUIIOI~ FOR MONACAZ~ C}tAP'iEi, FUTURE HOMEMAKERS OF ~4ERICA Section 1 Section 2 ARTICLE I Name - Sponsor - Purposes Name The organization shall be known as the Monacan Chapter, Future Homemakers of America which is a duly chartered member of the national and state organizations, Future Homemakers of America. Sponsor The advisor of the organization shall be the home eco- nomics teacher or teachers in the school. The chapter head- quarters shall be located in the school and shall function as a part of the home economics program. One teacher of the Home Economics Education staff shall serve as adviser and administration officer. Other home economics teachers sha~] serve as assistant advisers. (Y.:~'icct!ves and Purposes The general objective of the organization shall be to help individuals improve personal, family and community living. through organized group and individual activities as a part of the home economics education program in the school. The over-all goal of the association is to help youth assume their roles in society through home economics education in areas of personal growth, family life, vocational preparatlon. and community involvement. To emphasize specific parts of this over-all goal, Future Homemakers of America have eight purposes. They are: To provide opportunities for self-development and prep- aration for family and community living and for employment To strengthen the function of the family as a basic unit of society To encourage democracy through cooperative action in the home and community To encourage individual and group involvement in helping achieve worldwide brotherhood between youth and adults To provide opportunities for decision-making and for assuming responsibility To become aware of the multiple roles of men and women in today's society To develop interest in home economics, home economics careers, and related occupations ARTICLE II The Emblem The emblem of the local chapter of the Future Homemakers shall be the emblem of the Virginia Future Homemakers of America. ARTICLE III Membership The local organization shall consist of the students within the boundary of the school. A ci~apter may b~' forn~ed wimrever a group students enrolled in home economics classes shall meet together under the guidance of the home economics teacher or teachers, and with the approval of the high school principal, adopt a program of work and elect officers. A. Affiliation of members with local organization ~ne members shall affiliate with the local chapter bcforc October 15 of the fiscal year by paying their chapter dues. B. Chapters in Good Standing Chapters in good standing shall be those which maintain policies consistent with those of the state and national organizations and otherwise fulfill the requirements for affiliation. C. Chapter Members The types of members within the chapter shall be: 1. Active Members or senior high school or previously so enrolled, shail be eligible for membership in any certified chapter of the state organization. Such members may retai~ active membership during thc t:ira~ the junior and senior high school. Activt~ members shall be eligible to participate in chapter programs and projects, to hold office, and to be a voting member in all business sessions. 2. Honorary Members Honorary membership shall be awarded to individuals who have contributed to the advancement of the home economics education program in the high school and the chapter of the Future Homemakers of America. The chapter may determine the number of honorary memberships to be awarded each year and the procedure for selecting nominees for receiving this award. ARTICLE IV Affiliation The Monacan Chapter, Future Homemakers of America, shall, be an affiliate of the Dellwood Federation, Future Homemakers of America; Virginia Association, Future Homemakers of America. and the National Association, Future Homemakers of t~nerica. Section 1 Section 2 Section 3 ARTICLE V Officers Officers The local organization shall have the following officers: president, vice-president, secretary, treasurer, historian, and reporter. l'erm of Office The officers shall be elected for a term of one year and shall assume their duties at the end of the school session to serve the following year. Qualifications Candidates for chapter office shall have the following qualifications: a. One year of home economics and shall be enrolled in home economics while holding office, if possible. b. A satisfactory scholastic rating. c. }lave received or bt, working: o~ one dc:,ree of achiover~,e~t. - 4 - 5ectio~~, 4 Vacancies In the event an office becomes vacant due to transfer out of Monacan, illness, or other reason, the executive council with the approval of the adviser, shall have the power to fill the Vacancy. Section 1 Section 2 Section 3 Section 4 Section 5 Section 6 ARTICLE VI Duties of Officers President The president shall preside at all regular and special meetings. He/she shall appoint all co~ittees not otherwise selected to carry out the work of the chapter and shall be an ex-officio member of them. He/she shall be chairman of the constitution committee. Vice-President The vice-president shall be the chairman of the program committee. Me/she shall preside at meetings in the absence of the president, and will be an ex-officio member of ail committees when needed. Secretary The secretary shall keep a written record of all meetings, and a complete roll of the membership of the chapter. He/she shall take care of all official correspondence of the chapter, and write all invitations and thank you notes. Treasurer ~le treasurer shall be responsible for thc financi~l transactions of the chapter. He/she shall serve as co-chairman of the finance committee. Reporter The reporter shall be responsible for the publicity of the chapter. He/she shall serve as co-chairman of the publicity committee. His toriau The historian shall be the chapter photographer and shall compile a chapter yearbook of all activities. He/she shall be responsible for the installation se~zices of the chapter. - 5 - IIk~C~on ! Section 2 Section 3 Section 4 Section 5 ARTICLE ¥ii Nomination and Election of Officers Selection of Nominees The president shall appoint a nominating committee to select and present a slate of officer candidates to the chapter. The chapter nominating committee shall review the qualifications of candidates and select an officer candidate for each office. Presenting Slate of Officer Candidates The chapter nominating committee shall prepare and present the slate of officers to the chapter at the April meeting. Nomination from the Floor Nominations may be made from the floor at the chapter meeting. Election of Officers The chapter members shall vote following the presentation of the slate of candidates at the April meeting. State Officer Candidates The chapter shall have the privilege of selecting ~e nominee ms a state officer candidate. Section 1 Section 2 ARTICLE VIII Advisers Chapter Advisers Home Economics teachers in the high schools in which chapters are located shall be advisers to the chapters. The Home Economics teacher(s) at Monacan shall be the chapter adviser(s). Duties of Chapter Advisers The Chapter advisers shall have the following duties. He/she ~hall: 1. Be administrative officer for the chapter 2. Be responsible for funds 3. Give overall guidance in setting up the program of work Bt responsibl~ ~or c~;ta!~lishing [.~iicic~ ti~,~t those of the national and state organizations - 6- Section 1 Section 2 Seek the advice and approval of school administrators regarding all policies and major activities carried out by the chapter Give guidance to individuals, members and chapter committees ARTICLE IX Executive Council and Advisory Boards Chapter Executive Council The elected chapter officers compose the executive council. The chapter adviser(s) shall serve as official adviser(s) to the council. The executive council shall: a. Be responsible for planning ways of facilitating the chapter program of work. b. Approve the work of all chapter committee?~. c. Make decisions regarding the expenditure of funds. d. Determine thc program for the chapter mcetin~.~ and the business to be brought before tile members. e. Conduct much other business as shall facilitate the progress of the organization. Chapter Advisory Board ~e advisory board shall bc composed of the home economics teacher, the high school principal, and the area supervisor. The advisory board shall have the following duties: a. Serve in an advisory capacity to the chapter executive council. b. Determine policies and long time procedures that affect the organization. c. Approve the budget to be presented ~e the chapter executive council. d. Determine the time and place of chapter meetings. e. Take action r~'~ar(!~n:~ ~;~eci~] ~r~ ]e~.-.~ ,'~::~,-,~'~ti~,~ organization. Section 3 Section 1 Section 2 Section 3 Section 4 Meetings The regular meeting shall be held during class time as determined by the chapter advisor and the executive committee. ARTICLE X Emblem Emblem for Members Ail members of the chapter shall be entitled to wear the national emblem and the official guards. Emblem for Honorary Members tlonorary members (women) shall be entitled to wear the emblem and the official H guard. Honorary members (men) shall be entitled to wear the official key. Emblem for Advisers Chapter advisers shall be entitled to wear the emblem and the official A guard. Emblem for Chapter Parents Chapter parents shall be entitled to wear t{~c ~ffJc~aJ en~lem and the P guard. Section 1 Section 2 Section 3 ARTICLE XI Dues - Fiscal Year - Budget Chapter, State, and National Dues Individual membership dues in the organization shall be determlned by the chapter executive council. Membership dues together with themames of members and a copy of the chapter program of work shall be forwarded to the area supervisor prior to December 1 annually, by the chapter adviser. National dues for chapter members are forwarded to the national adviser by the state adviser. Fiscal Year The fiscal year shall be July 1 through June 30. Budget · h~ budget shall be prepared by the chapter treasurer ia cooperation w~tb the chapter adviser. It shall be approved by ti~c chapter exccul, ivc ceuncil and the advisory board. ton 2 -8- ARTICLE XII Standing Committees Appointment The president shall appoint, after consultation with adviser, the members of all committees. Committees to be Appointed ~le need for committees will be determined by the executive council at its first meeting after reviewing the work of the committees of the previous year and considering a program of work for the current year. The following committees shall be appointed to carry out the work of the organization: (1) program of works (2) consti- tution; (3) membership; (4) finance; (5) records and yearbook; (6) publicity; and (7) degrees. CHESTERFI ELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGE NDA MEETING DATE: SUBJECT: February 25, 1987 ITEM NUMBER;,., ll.F.1. UTILITY PUBLIC HEARING: Ordinance to Vacate a Portion of a 16' Drainage Easement within Lot 17, Block C, Section A, Bailey Ridge Estates COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION' Staff is requesting the Board to adopt an ordinance to vacate a portion of a 16' drainage easement within Lot 17, Block C, Section A, Bailey Ridge Estates. A dwelling has been located on this lot that is encroaching into the drainage easement as shown on attached plat. Potts and Minter professional land surveyors, have submitted an application requesting the vacation of a portion of the 16' drainage easement. St'aff has reviewed the requests and recommends approval. Staff recommends that the Board adopt the ordinance to vacate a portion of a 16' drainage easement within Lot 17, Block C, Section A, Bailey Ridge Estates. District: Matoaca Recommend Approval ATTACHMENTS: YES I~'' NO D SIGNATURE: _ /~C~--UN~Y ADMI NISTRATOR >0 1 · ,,?0 t Rtchmond Church PLAT SHOWING A PORTION OF A DRAINAGE EASENENT TO BE VACATED ON LOT 17, BLOCK "C", PLAN OF "BAILEY RIDGE ESTATES", SECTION "A", IN TIIE " "~b,,~"- MATOACA DISTRICT OF CItESTERFI ELD ~.l COUNTY, VIRGINIA. /SCALE: 1"=25' FEBRUARY 4, 1987 D6£P HOZ Z 0t~ CO#lTl' Potts and Minter Professional Land Surveyors 101308 HULL STREET ROAD, MID., VA, 23113, ?45-28?6 J.N. ~607-11 CHESTERFI ELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA MEETING DATE: SUBJECT: February 25, 1987 ITEM NUMBER; Right of Way for Turner Road ll.F.2. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: ? SUMMARY OF INfQRMATION; S~ ~Hu~sts the Board to authorize__ the County Administrator to accept a deed from John C. ~llather f~r ~ 45' wide strip of land from the centerlin~/o~ ~Turner ROSa across his property and authorize the Cou~yy 3~ministrator to sign an option- agreement with The Sta~e_Department of Transportation for the conveyance of ~5~ feet from the centerline. Staff also requests the Board to set a public hearing for March 25, 1987, at 9:00 a.m. for approval of the conveyance. Since the State Department of Highways and Transportation is ready to advertise this project, staff recommends that the Board authorize the County Administrator tc sign a rigkt cf entrV letter to the State Department of Highways and Transportation to prevent delay in advertising the project. Staff recommends that the Board authorize the County Administrator to accept the deed from Mr. Cullather, sign the option with the State Department of Highways and Transportation, set a public hearing for March 25, 1987, at 9:00 a.m. and sign the right of entry letter with the State Department of Highways and Transportation. District: Clover Hill ~EPARED BY;.~~ ~ Reco ...... end ApproVal ATTACHMENTS' YES ~/~ NO ~ SIGNATURE: · /'dS~NTY ADMINISTRATOR 700 7,~ 4 ,? CHESTERFI ELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA MEETING DATE: SUBJECT: February 25, 1987 ITEM NUMBER: ll.F.3.a. Contract for Installation of a Water Line for Cove Ridge Section II COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OFINFORMATION: Staff requests that the Board approve the following contract: Water Contract Number W86-21CD, Cove Ridge - Section II: Developer: Brandermill Contractor: R. M. C. Contractors, Inc. Total Contract Cost: $71,174.00 Refund through Connections: Cash Refund: Total Estimated County Cost: $18,900.00 $ 3,137.34 $22,037.34 Estimated Developer Cost: $49,136.66 Number of'Connections: 36 Code: Transfer $3,137.34 from 5H-5724-2009 to 5H-5724-7269 for cash refund. This is a portion of a 16" water line that will be needed to serve the property west of the Swift Creek Reservoir along Genito Road. Staff recommends that the Board approve the contract and authorize the County Administrator to execute any necessary documents and approve the $3,137.34 transfer. District: Midlothian Recommend ApproVal ATTACHMENTS: YES[;/' NO [] PREPARED BY; _ SIGNATURE: ,.---'~ /? / ~:~Ij~4T'Y ADMINISTRATOR CHESTERFI ELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGE NDA MEET lNG DATE' SUBJECT: February 25, 1987 ITEM NUMBER: ll.F.3.b. Approval of Agreement with the Virginia Department of Transportation for Adjustment of Utilities on Route N,,mher 145 (Centralia Road) COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION This agreement provides for adjustment of utilities for proposed reconstruction of the intersection of Route 145 and Hopkins Road. The Highway Department is responsible for 60.98% of the cost of the water facility adjustments and the County will be responsible for 39.02%. Staff has reviewed this agreement and recommends that the County Administrator be authorized to execute this agreement on behalf of the county subject to review and approval of the County Attorney. The CountY's cost for relocating these water lines will be funded from 5H-5835-400E, miscellaneous highway projects. District: Dale/Bermuda Reco-,,-end Approval ATTACHMENTS: YES ~ NO [] SIGNATURE: COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR I.:'0 \ ;O~-$T \ J / / / / / / / / / CLue I 1.00 i 0.?,~ 3ELLWO00 This Pr o ~c~t ! ./ CHESTERFI ELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA MEET lNG DATE' SUBJECT: February 25, 1987 ITEM NUMBER; ll.F.3, c. Acceptance of Deed of Dedication along Warbro Road from Randolph Kelly and Carol D. Shively COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION Staff requests the Board accept the conveyance of a 5' strip of land along Warbro Road from Randolph Kelly and Carol D. Shively, and authorize the County Administrator to execute the necessary deed. It is the policy of the County to acquire right of way whenever possible through development to meet the ultimate road width as shown on the Plan 2000. The dedication of this right of way conforms to that plan. Staff recommends that the Board accept the conveyance of this right of way and authorize the County Administrator to execute the necessary deed. District: Clover Hill Recommend Approval ATTACHMENTS: Y E~' NO ri SIGNATURE: /~ ' ADM I N I STRATOR le 7:"/vL 48. ,7 (/) ~,0 I.,,= I IQ. OZI-' ' / C o.og'~ PLAT SHOWING A 5' STRIP OF LAND ACROSS TIlE PROPERTY OF RANDOLPH KELLY SHIVELY TO BE DEDICATED TO THE COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD. SITUATED ON THE EASTERN LINE OF WARBRO ROAD IN THE CLOVER HILL DISTRICT OF CHESTERFIELD COUNTY , VIRGINIA SCALE: 1":50 ' JULY 19, 1986 Potts and Minter Professional Land Surveyors 10138B HULL STREET ROAD, MID. VA. 23113. T4S-2IT~ J.N. 8511-30 CHESTERFI ELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA L. MEETING DATE' SUBJECT: February 25, 1987 ITEM NUMBER;. ll.F. 3. d. Acceptance of Deed of Dedication along West Hundred Road from Hugh A. and Deborah P. Cline COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION Staff requests the Board accept the conveyance of a 15' strip of land along West Hundred Road from Hugh A. and Deborah P. Cline, and authorize the County Administrator to execute the necessary deed. It is the policy of the County to acquire right of way whenever possible through development to meet the ultimate road width as shown on the Plan 2000. The dedication of this right of way conforms to that plan. Staff recommends that the Board accept the conveyance of this right of way and authorize the County Administrator to execute the necessary deed. District: Bermuda Reco,,,aend Approval ATTACHMENTS: YES '~ NO [] SIGNATURE: ~OU~Y ADMI N¥~TRATOR N / / t / / / / / A 41 ! t' I I I OR I / / t ' CHESTER % I I I I t I P~ge 41 ' \ \ \ / O0 ! I / This is to certify that I made an accurate fiel(~ survey of the premises shown hereon; that ail improvements and easements known or visible are shown hereon; that there are no encroachments by improvements either from aQjoining premises or from subject premises upon adloinilqg premises other than shown hereon.77'~.;S LOCK£ No. 970 ,,Z:~Cl,mc~l ,d=j'' L~/~ c/c. //6 - .7 /"/O,~T/"/ L,//¥,E:, O~= ,I(_.,,',~_2~T /-I/_/,/"/DP-_.,P_,~EL'~j. Z3 ~ Date:_~ep~. ,~ Scale:/"= 60' /..,Y/YYO' ~ .OI~T~IC, T BAT ,ZER AND A~;~OCIATES. INC. Job No.: ~'- ~'_..~ · PLAN N ERS' ARCH ITECTS · ENGIN EERS- SURVEYORS- 501 Branchway Road · Richmond, Virginia 23236.794-0571 REFLECTIN(~ TOIVI~ROW CHESTERFI ELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGE NDA MEETING DATE: SUBJECT: February 25, 1987 ITEM NUMBER; Acceptance of Deed of Dedication Branch from Perry G. Miles ll.F.3, e. along Reedy COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Staff requests the Board accept the conveyance of a 25' strip of land along Reedy Branch Road from Perry G. Miles, and authorize the County Administrator to execute the necessary deed. It is the policy of the County to acquire right of way whenever possible through development to meet the ultimate road width as shoWn on the Plan 2000. The dedication of this right of way conforms to that plan. Staff recommends that the Board accept the conveyance of this right of way and authorize the County Administrator to execute the necessary deed. District: Matoaca Recommend Approval ATTACHMENTS: YES ~ NO [] SIGNATURE: PREPARED BY;. ~ ~UiF~FI~' ADMINI STRATOR N A iI 52 /. ! I JOIN5 ~o I I CHESTERFI ELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA MEETING DATE: SUBJECT: February 25, 1987 ITEM NUMBER; ll.F.3, f. Approval of a Deed of Correction from Southeastern Associates, Incorporated COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION Staff is requesting the Board to authorize the Chairman of the Board and the County Administrator to execute a deed of correction from Southeastern Associates, Incorporated, a Virginia Corporation. Southeastern Associates, Incorporated granted the County a (variable width strip of land, north of the existing Mall Drive,% which contained an incorrect description of the property. Southeastern Associates, Incorporated request the County to accept a deed of correction to correct that description. This has been reviewed by staff and staff recommends that the Board authorize the Chairman of the Board and the County Administrator to execute the deed of correction. District: Midlothian Recommend Approval ATTACHMENTS: YES I~ NO [] SIGNATURE: '/'d"GUNTY ADMI NI STRATOR .i Pond "\% YOUNG P~ge ? £G£ CHESTER- FIELD M ALL RICHMOND 7 La, CHESTERFI ELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGE NDA MEETING DATE: SUBJECT: February 25, 1987 ITEM NUMBER: ll.F.4. Report of Water and Sewer Contracts by Developers COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION The following water and sewer contracts were executed by the County Administrator: S87-16D Silver Birch Clover Hill Developer: Investors Woodlake Development Corp. Contractor: RMC Contractors,Inc. Number of Connections: 37 $69,234.00 S87-17D Pleasant Grove Clover Hill Developer: Investors Woodlake Development Corp. Contractor: RMC Contractors, Inc. Number of'Connections: 30 $44,104.00 S87-4D St. Regents Lake Developer: R. E. Collier, Inc., Builder Contractor: Lyttle Utilities, Inc. Number of Connections: 54 Clover Hill $70,403.00 (Continued on next page) ATTACHMENTS: YES 0 NO SIGNATURE: C o~A%~, N! STRAT OR Agenda Items February 25, 1987 Page 2 e 10. S87-13D Cline Tire Store Bermuda Developer: Hugh A. Cline Contractor: Best Backhoe and Excavating, Inc. Number of Connections: 2 $11,604.00 S87-11D Sommerville Section 2 Developer: Sommerville Development Corp. Contractor: RMC Contractors, Inc. Number of Connections: 6 Midlothian $14,497.00 S87-12D Beechwood Point Phase II Clover Hill Developer: Investors Woodlake Development Corp. Contractor: RMC Contractors, Inc. Number of Connections: 14 $20,547.00 W87-20D Beechwood Point Phase II Clover Hill Developer: Investors Woodlake Development Corp. Contractor: RMC Contractors Number of Connections: 13 $10,940.00 W87-15D St. Regent's Lake Phase I Developer: R.E. Collier, Inc. Contractor: Lyttle Utilities Number of Connections: 53 Clover Hill $32,568.75 W87-13D B&B Parcel 910 Bermuda Developer: B&B Amusements Co., Inc. Contractor: Nelson-White Construction Management Corp. Number of Connections: 1 $13,505.00 W87-18D Sommerville Section 2 Developer: Sommerville Development Corp. Contractor: RMC Contractors Inc. Number of Connections: 10 Midlothian $24,054.00 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISOR~ AGENDA RE PORTS MEETING DATE: ...... February 25, 1987 ~ Report on Future Needs of Chesterfield County Library System ll.G. The Virginia Commonwealth University Center for Public Affairs and the Department of Urban Studies and Planning conducted a study of the present and future needs of the Chesterfield County Public Library System. The study consisted of random telephone surveys of citizens at large and known library patrons to ascertain their feelings about present and proposed library services and policies and how the library can improve its usefulness to our citizens. The study also makes recommen- dations for new branches which are needed at this time and others which will be needed after 1993. The report also make recommendations for operational improvements. We are requesting a work session with the Board to present the findings of the study. In addition, the library director proposes to outline the need for upgrading present facilities. In the meantime, if you have any questions regarding the survey, please contact Dr. Robert Wagenknecht at 748-1765. The report should be officially received by the Board at this time. Staff will be making a presentation. ATTACHMENTS: YES I~ NO C! SIGNATURE: "COIfJNTY ADMINISTRATOR Recommendations of Library Director Concerning Present Facilities Enlarge Central Library in order to: -house central collection of 185,000 volumes (have 90,000 volumes now) -increase present 111 reader seats to 177 -enlarge technical processing department which pre- pares books for public use for all facilities -rearrange administrative areas for increased efficiency -increase flexibility of meeting room facility -develop special collection facilities and areas (e.g. local history, quiet study area, computer reference area ) -provide additional parking area Existing Problems at Central The Central library's collections require Library receives frequent patron complaints. pace with population growth. substantial improvement. Collection has not kept All available seats are frequently taken, particularly after school, evenings and on Saturday. Staff are frequently called upon to advise patrons concerning times to visit when the library is less crowded. Even though shelving capacity was recently enlarged there is presently insufficient space to house collections. Because of insufficient public shelving space many oversized books, two thirds of the paperback collection and a major part of the record and large type book collections are housed in work areas where the public cannot have access to them. In the non fiction area shelving is so tight that pages cannot keep books in order, thereby making it impossible for staff or public to find them. Thirteen shelves in the stacks are currently devoted to shelving returned books until space opens up on the public shelves. These popular books are thus unwillingly withheld from circulation. Frequent complaints are received from patrons who must wait in line to use catalogs. The only way to increase catalogs is to further decrease public seating. Staff lounge seats an absolute maximum of eight, which is far too small for staff of 44 plus volunteers. Technical processing department must be expanded and rearranged in order to efficiently handle present work load. At present department is too small and scattered around building. Replace Chester branch in order to: -adequately house present collection of 50,000 volumes -increase public seats from 30 to 58 (Chester has 2/3 the seating capacity of Ettrick-Matoaca) -provide public meeting area -better arrange internal spaces for improved supervision Please Note: According to Robert Rivers and Bernie Schmelz it will be more cost effective to replace than to renovate pres- ent building. Existinq Problems at Chester Circulation desk area is too small for both patrons and staff. results in congestion and confusion. This Branch has insufficient seating. in adult study area. There are only 20 chairs available Adult fiction and non fiction shelves are severely overcrowded. Part of the collection (over 750 books) is regularly shelved away from public view because of lack of space. Library must weed a book to add a book. Library restricts the number of duplicate copies of new and frequently requested titles because of shelving limitations. Reference shelves are so crowded with needed and well-used materials that library cannot order needed new reference titles, especially multi-volume reference sets such as literature criticism and analysis, material on other countries and current health topics. There is no .separate reference seating. Over 600 recordings are stored in workrooms because there is no room to display them to the public. There is no space available to house and display audiocassettes or compact discs without dropping something else. Work surfaces are so limited that two tasks cannot be performed at the same time, such as cleaning records and repairing books. These two jobs have been done recently by volunteers at the library; thus volunteers must be scheduled when work space is available. Work surface is so -2- limited that it must be cleared for daily delivery of mail and material from other branches. Work surface cannot be significantly increased without enlarging work room. Over 450 children's books cannot be shelved where the public can have access to them because of lack of shelving space. To increase shelving space room must be enlarged. The steps to the lower level of the children's room make transporting books from one level to the other difficult. Steps also make lower level inaccessible to the handicapped and to mothers with babies in strollers. Oue to lack of a meeting room the only activities and programs for children in the library are limited to three regularly scheduled story times year-round and summer time movies. Whenever there is any activity/program occurring in the children's room (the only place for such) the children's room is not accessible to other patrons seeking children's books. Groups wishing to use meeting room are regularly turned down. There is insufficient seating in the children's room. Far more than the present 12 seats are needed yet there is no space for additional seating. Because this is the only seating available for school groups visiting the library teachers must be asked to bring on!y a limited number of students when they come. Enlarge Bon Air, Midlothian and La Prade branches in order to: -increase book stock to 65,000 -increase public seating capacity to 68 -increase flexibility of meeting room -improve internal organization of public and work area Existing Problems at Bon Air Staff receive frequent complaints about noise and crowdi'ng. Complaint concerning noise is supported by Virginia Commonwealth University survey. Separate children's roemwill help reduce noise level. Shelving inadequate for existing adult collection; 10 to 15% of collection must be housed away from public view. Need for larger adult collection is frequently expressed by public. is impossible to enlarge collection unless building is enlarged. It More seating space is necessary. only. There is frequently standing room -3- A larger meeting room which can be divided into two parts is necessary. At least 100 requests for use were denied last year because meeting room was already booked. Yet at least 39 times last year room was used by just two people. A larger partitioned room could allow use by two groups simultaneously. Maximum use is not made of periodicals because of inadequate display due to lack of space. lhirty-five percent of the requests for magazines the l~bra~y owns cannot be filled because older issues are routinely discarded due to lack of space. Existing Problems at Midlothian Lack of noise control and crowding are constant patron complaints. There is not enough public seating, expecially on nights and Saturdays during the school year. For example, on October 20, 21 and 23 library had standing room only. Library will be out of space to store, comprehensively, back issues of magazines after 1988. Duplicate copies and lesser used books are now being stored in the workroom.. A 20-volume set, THE OCEAN WORLD OF JACQUES COUSTEAU, is also being stored in back due to space limitations. We are quickly running out of space in the Reference Area for additional reference tools. About half of our Large Type Book collection is currently stored in a closet. Shelf space needs to be increased. Books are often jammed so tightly together, to fit them in, that patrons must fight to get them out. There is not enough space at the Return Counter to set returned items and to accommodate several people paying fines, asking questions, and conducting business at one time. Library has currently run out of room. at the circulation desk for reserved books waiting to be picked up. )~eeting room is inadequate to meet demand. Existing Problems at La Prade Inadequate space for existing collection. Books by authors of fiction whose last names start with last four letters of alphabet are not available for examination by public. Duplicate volumes of needed titles which library owns are not available for examination by public. Fiction shelving is so crowded that returned books fre- quently cannot be inmnediately reshelved thereby depriving public of most popular books. Adequate area for needed shelving does not exist. The 16 adult seats in the library are inadequate to meet the need. People must wait for seats or leave the library. There is no area in which one may sit down and read periodicals. When this area was first taken over by shelving library received over 50 complaints per month. Periodicals over 3 years old are discarded because there is no place to store them in spite of fact library routinely receives requests for older periodical issues. A 2 month survey of business reference questions showed that 64% were not answered due to a lack of materials. There is no space to put additional materials in present building. Library receives an average of 12 complaints per week regarding noise and crowded conditions. The branch receives continuing expressions of dissatisfaction concerning reference and adult non fiction collections. CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA MEETING DATE: February 25, 1987 11. H.1. REPORT ON: GENERAL FUND BALANCE, STATUS OF GENERAL FUND CONTINGENCY, SCHEDULE OF CAPITALIZED LEASE PURCHASES, ROAD RESERVE FUNDS, SCHEDULE OF SCHOOL LITERARY LAONS AND DISTRICT ROAD AND STREET LIGHT FUNDS ATTACHMENTS: YES ~ NO r'l I~t(tNATUE: //7////// _. . _ coUi~TY N:)MINISTRATOR J Board Meeting Date 07/01/86 07/01/86 07/01/86 07/09/86 07/09/86 07/23/86 08/13/86 09/24/86 10/22/86 01/14/87 02/11/87 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY GENERAL FUND BALANCE February 18, 1987 Description FY87 Budgeted Beginning Fund Balance Add to Fund Balance in FY87 Budget Reserve for Future Debt Debt Service - Reduction of FY87 interest expense due to refunding a portion of the 1981 bonds MH/MR - Fund critical needs Board Miscellaneous - Paint Water Tank Old Stage Road - Waterline extension Leaf Collection Chester Landfill Groundwater Program Jail Addition Architectural Services County Museum - County History Book Project ($8,000 for author fees and $25,333 for publication) Amount +790,300 3,765,500 + 78,400 85,900 25,000 37,500 116,500 60,000 31,850 20,694 Balance $10,322,758 11,113,058 7,347,558 7,425,958 7,340,058 7,315,058 7,277,558 7,161,058 7,101,058 7,069,208 7,048,514 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY STATUS OF GENERAL FUND CONTINGENCY ACCOUNT February 18, 1987 Date 07/01/86 07/09/86 08/13/86 09/10/86 09/26/86 10/08/86 11/26/86 02/14/87 Department/Description Original FY87 Budget Appropriation Chamber of Commerce proposal for Richmond SBA 503 Certified Development Co. YMCA in Chester/Route 10 - Donation Fire Department - Increase per call paid to volunteers from $1 to $3 Airport - Renovate terminal building Donations - Petersburg Symphony - additional Fire Dept. - Paving of parking lot at Enon Volunteer Fire Station. Museum - County History Book Project ($8,000 for author fees and $25,333 for publi- cation) Amount 16,860.00 23,501.00 29,000.00 7,500.00 5,000.00 5,500.00 12,639.00 Balance $100,000.00 83,140.00 59,639.00 30,639.00 23,139.00 18,139.00 12,639.00 Prepared by ~counting Department February 18, 1987 SCHEDULE OF CAPITALIZED LEASE PURCHASES Description Original Date Date Lease Lease Lease Outstanding Purchase Purchase Purchase Balance Amount Began Ends 12/31/86 Major Capital Facilities Lease Purchase: Data Processing, Human Services, Courts Building Vehicle and Communi- cations Mainten- ance Building Subtotal Major Equipment Lease Purchase: Communications Equipment: Microwave System 800 MHz System Mobile Radios - Police Automatic Call Distributors Subtotal Leaf pickup equipment Data Processing equipment Accounting System $ 2,106,355 12/85 6/01 5,168,170 12/85 6/01 14,440,475 12/85 6/01 21,715,000 1,000,000 22,715,000 9/82 6/90 1,338,333 5/81 4/88 2,888,682 10/84 7/91 762,170 12/86 6/91 189~897 5,179,082 12/86 6/91 214,819 12/86 6/91 300,705 8/85 8/89 250,000 10/84 9/91 $ 1,990,925 4,884,950 * 13~649,125 20,525,000 551,205 21,076,205 308,204 2,052,634 762,170 189,897 3,312,905 211,595 199,298 178,490 Description Original Date Date Lease Lease Lease Outstanding Purchase Purchase Purchase Balance Amount Began Ends 12/31/86 Fire Trucks Voting Machines Subtotal 404,912 1/83 12/87 91,745 132,800 7/85 6/90 99,445 1,303,236 780~573 Routine Equipment Lease Purchase: Microfilm Equipment Vehicles: County Schools Printshop Equipment Copiers Nursing Home Copier Utilities Copier Airport: Fuel Truck Subtotal 75,640 4/85 3/90 52,312 29,853 12/84 11/87 10,056 39,804 12/84 11/87 13,512 52,613 4/84 9/88 14,709 23,530 12/83 12/90 12,769 6,836 9/83 8/88 1,242 14,960 7/84 6/89 8,223 22,907 12/86 6/91 22,907 266,143 135,730 TOTAL $29,463,461 $25~305~413 * On September 24, 1986, the Board of Supervisors approved a supple- mental lease purchase for $5,500,000 to increase the financing of the construction of the Courts Building. Board Meeting Date CHESTERFIELD COUNTY ROAD RESERVE FUNDS February 18, 1987 Description 05/09/84 Route 36 Ettrick - Appropriated for design contract with VDH&T $ 10/10/84 Route 10 - Design work for widening through Chester 10/10/84 Route 36 Ettrick - Additional funds for design contract with VDH&T 08/28/85 Route 36 Ettrick - Transferred General Funds to Ruffin Mill Road project 08/28/85 Route 36 Ettrick - Use of Revenue Sharing funds 03/12/86 Route 36 Ettrick - Reduce Revenue Sharing and add back General Funds 03/12/86 Route 10 - Reduce General Funds and add Revenue Sharing Funds $133,000 05/28/86** Route 36 Ettrick - Appropriate Reserve funds 05/28/86** Route 10 - Appropriate Reserve funds Total Project Appropriation Rt. 36 Ettrick 150,000 165,000 (133,000) 133,000 2,500,000 2,815,000 Rt. 10 Chester $ 350,000 0 1,485,000 1~835r000 * $4,500,000 was reserved 7/1/84 for these projects. **Chester project loaned the Ettrick project $165,000 5/28/86. Prepared by Budget &Management February 18, 1987 Sr'J~'~ULE OF S~'~OOL ~ LOAI~'S Proiect Greenfield & Watkins Grange Hall Harrowgate Swift Creek Jr. Providence Jr. Robious Jr. Salem Jr. Manchester MonacanHigh Total Matoaca Elementary Clover Hill High Manchester Nigh Total Bellwood Beulah Bon Air Chalkley Crestwood Curtis Davis F. C. Elem. L. C. Bird Matoaca High Meadowbrook Thomas Dale Total O. B. Gates Genito Road Elem. New Midlothian High Total Ettrick Gordon Harrowgate Carver Jr. Chester Middle F. C. 3r. Total Approved By Board Of Supervisors Date Amount CONVERSION Date Amount 1979 $ 1,500,000 12/15/79 $ 1,340,O75 3/26/80 1,000,000 6/1/82 1,000,000 3/26/80 750,000 8/1/81 553,4~1 3/26/80 750,000 8/1/81 537,184 3/26/80 750,000 5/1/82 627,942 3/26/80 750,000 3/1/83 566,008 3/26/80 750,000 3/1/83 547,760 3/26/80 750,000 2/1/82 750,000 3/26/80 750,000 5/1/82 520,539 6,250,000 5,102,874 Balance FY LOANTO 02/17/87 Be Paid Out 871,650 2000 800,000 2002 415,500 2002 403,500 2002 502,400 2002 452,800 2003 438,400 2003 562,500 2002 416,000 2002 3,991,100 7/1/81 1,000,000 4/1/83 1,000,000 850,000 7/22/81 1,000,000 3/1/84 966,854 821,950 7/22/81 1,000,000 6/1/84 1,000,000 900,000 2,000,000 1,966,854 1,721,950 1/13/82 600,000 3/1/85 600,000 540,000 1/13/82 750,000 12/15/85 750,000 712,500 1/13/82 1,000,000 3/1/85 1,O00,000 900,000 1/13/82 600,000 3/1/85 600,000 540,000 1/13/82 600,000 3/1/85 600,000 540,000 1/13/82 600,000 3/1/85 600,000 540,000 1/13/82 600,000 3/1/85 600,000 540,000 1/13/82 600,000 3/1/85 600,000 540,000 1/13/82 1,000,000 11/1/84 980,315 882,000 1/13/82 1,000,000 11/1/84 1,000,000 900,000 1/13/82 500,000 1/1/84 500,000 425,000 1/13/82 1,000,000 6/1/85 1,000,000 950,000 8,850,000 8,830,315 8,009,500 2124182 2,000,000 911184 2,000,000 2/24/82 2,000,000 9/1/85 2,000,000 2/24/82 2,000,000 2/1/85 2,000,000 6,000,000 6,000,000 1,800,000 1,900,000 1,800,000 5,500,000 2003 2004 2004 2005 2006 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2004 2004 2004 2005 2004 2006 2005 7/27/83 2,000,000 8/1/87' 2,000,000 2,000,000 2006* 7/27/83 750,000 2/1/87' 750,000 750,000 2006* 7/27/83 750,000 2/1/87' 750,000 750,000 2006* 7/27/83 750,000 8/1/87' 750,000 750,000 2006* 7/27/83 500,000 2/1/87' 500,000 500,000 2006* 7/27/83 500,000 2/1/87' 500,000 500,000 2006* 5,250,000 5,250,000 5,250,000 Project Hopkins West Prov. Elem. Monacan High Total Enon Elem. Hening Watkins Total 360 West Elem. Enon Elem. Addl. Approved By Board Of Supervisors Date Amount 3/28/84 $ 1,500,000 3/28/84 2,000,000 3/28/84 1,500,000 5,000,000 CONVERSION Balance Date Amount 02/17/87 6/1/87' $ 1,500,000 $ 1,500,000 6/1/87' 2,000,000 2,000,000 6/1/87' 1,500,000 1,500,000 5,000,000 5,000,000 12/12/84 1,500,000 6/1/87' 1,500,000 1,500,000 12/12/84 750,000 6/1/87' 750,000 750,000 12/12/84 1,000,000 6/1/87' 1,000,000 1,000,000 3,250,000 3,250,000 3,250,000 2/13/85 2,000,000 6/1/87' 2,000,000 2,000,000 Be Paid Out 2007* 2007* 2007* 2007* 2007* 2007* 2008* 4/25/85 500,000 6/1/87' 500,000 500,000 2007* L. C. Bird 6/26/85 1,500,000 6/1/87' 1,500,000 1,500,000 Chester Middle 6/26/85 1,500,000 12/1/87' 1,500,000 1,500,000 Tech Center 6/26/85 500,000 12/1/87' 500,000 500,000 Clover Hill High 6/26/85 2,000,000 12/1/87' 2,000,000 2,000,000 Crestwood Elem. 6/26/85 300,000 12/1/87' 300,000 300,000 Davis Elem. 6/26/85 300,000 12/1/87' 300,000 300,000 O. B. Gates 6/26/85 1,500,000 12/1/87' 1,500,000 1,500,000 Meadowbrook 6/26/85 1,000,000 12/1/87' 1,000,000 1,000,000 Midlothian High 6/26/85 1,750,000 6/1/87' 1,750,000 1,750,000 New Elem. (Central) 6/26/85 2,000,000 12/1/87~ 2,000,000 2,000,000 New Elem. (Genito) 6/26/85 2,000,000 12/1/87' 2,000,000 2,000,000 New Elem. (360/Courthouse) 6/26/85 2,000,000 12/1/87' 2,000,000 2,000,000 Providence 3r. 6/26/85 750,000 12/1/87' 750,000 750,000 Wells Elem. 6/26/85 1,750,000 12/1/87' 1,750,000 1,750,000 Total 18,850,000 18,850,000 18,850,000 6/25/86 1,000,000 12/1/88' 1,000,000 1,000,000 Meadowbrook TOTAL LITERARY LOANS $60,090,118 $61,450,000 $56,794,200 2008~ 2008~ 2008* 2008* 2008* 2008* 2008* 2008* 2008* 2008* 2008* 2008* 2008~ 2008~ 2009* Estimates 0 0 0 ~-I 0 0 0 · ~ 0 0 I J3 0 0 0 4J 0 0 0'~ 0 0 0 0 ~ 0 0 0 0 0 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGE NDA MEETING DATE: February 25, 1987 ll.H.2. REPORT ON: ROADS ACCEPTEQ INTO STATE SECONDARY SYSTE~ ATTACHMENTS: YES XE~ NO [] $1GNATUflI[: COUNTY al:~l~ ,T RAY D. PETHTEL COMMISSIONER COMMONWEALTH o[ VIRQINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 1401 EAST BROAD STREET RICHMOND, 23219 February 5, 1987 OSCAR K. MABRY DEPU~ COMMISSIONER Secondary System Additions Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors County of Chesterfield P. O. Box 40 Chesterfield, VA 23832 Members of the Board: As requested in your resolution dated August 14, 1985, the following additions to the Secondary System of Chesterfield County are hereby approved, effective February 5, 1987. ADDITIONS LENGTH POWDERHAM SUBDIVISION - SECTIONS B&C Route 1237 (Ellesmere Drive) - From 0.07 mile southeast of Route 1014 to Route 1068 Route 3355 (Edmonthorpe Road) - From Route 1237 to Route 3356 Route 3356 (Cassaway Road) - From Route 1237 to 0.05 mile north of Route 3355 Sincerely, Deputy Commissioner 0.43 Mi. 0.25 Mi. 0.21 Mi. TRANSPORTATION FOR THE 21 ST CENTURY RAY D. PETHTEL COMMISSIONER COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 1401 EAST BROAD STREET RICHMOND, 23219 February 12, 1987 OSCAR K. MABRY DEPUTY COMMISSIONER Board of Supervisors County of Chesterfield P. O. Box 40 Chesterfield, VA 23832 Secondary System Abandonment Chesterfield County Members of the Board: As requested in your resolution dated January 9, 1985, the following abandonment from the Secondary System of Chesterfield County is hereby approved, effective February 12, 1987. ABANDONMENT LENGTH Route 2540 (Savoy Road) - From Route 1990 to 0.03 mile west of Route 1990 0.03 Mi. Sincerely, Deputy Commissioner TRANSPORTATION FOR THE 21 ST CENTURY CHESTERFI ELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA MEETING DATE: SUBJECT: February 25, 1987 Lunch ITEM NUMBER: ll.I. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION The Board has been invited by the Chesterfield County Museum Committee for lunch. PREPARED BY: ATTACHMENTS: YES I-I NO I~ SIGNATURE: COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR 'J 9:'; BOARD OF SUPERVISORS R. GARLAND DODD ,CHAIRMAN BERMUDA DISTRICT HARRY G. DANIEL, VICE CHAIRMAN DALE DISTRICT G. H. APPLEGATE CLOVER H ILL DISTRICT JOAN GIRONE MIDLOTHIAN DISTRICT JESSE J. MAYES M ATOAC A DISTRICT CH ESTER FI ELD COUNTY P.O. BOX 40 CHESTERFIELD, VIRGINIA 23832 COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR RICHARD L. HEDRICK TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: The Honorable Members of the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors Richard L. Hedrick~__~~nistrator Stanley R. Ba!d~n,_Jr. -- ' ~ Economic Development Director February 25, 1987 European Marketing Program - Funding 2. 3. 4. $236,071.00 in Airpark Reserve Fund Additional $147,500.00 of revenue under contract. Total - $383,571 in Airpark Reserve Fund. Requested appropriation from Airpark Revenue Fund a. $13,500 - complete current contract with Contrade b. $16,500 - to extend Contrade contract through June 1987 c. $23,000 - for 1987 (first two weeks in May) European Marketing Trip. Total appropriations - $53,000 Air Park Reserve Fund balance after above noted appropriations - $330,571. SB7F52/dle BOARD OF SUPERVISORS HARRY G. DANIEL, CHAIRMAN DALE DISTRICT JESSE J. MAYES, VICE CHAIRMAN MATOACA DISTRICT G. H. APPLEGATE CLOVER HILL DISTRICT R. GARLAND DODD BERMUDA DtSTRICT JOAN GIRONE MIDLOTHIAN DISTRICT CHES TERFIEL D C 0 UN T Y P.O. Box 40 CHESTERFIELD, VIRGINIA 23832 RICHARD L. HEDRICK COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Richard L. Hedrick, County Administrator Richard F. Sale, Assistant County Administrator for Development~'~~~--- February 25, 1987 European Trip/Foreign Recruitment Each Member of the Board was contacted regarding a) continuation of foreign business recruitment via contract with CONTRADE and b) European marketing trip. Three Members of the Board indicated a desire to discuss this further over lunch/dinner. One Member suggested a year's deferral because of the County's financial situation and another Member agreed with the recommendation included in your memorandum of February 3, 1987 (copy attached). pb Attachment BOARD OF SUPERVISORS HARRY G. DANIEL, CHAIRMAN DALE DISTRICT JESSE J. MAYES, VICE CHAIRMAN MATOACA DISTRICT G. H. APPLEGATE CLOVER HILL DISTRICT R. GARLAND DODD BERMUDA DISTRICT JOAN GIRONE MIDLOTHIAN DISTRICT CHESTERFIELD COUNTY P.O. Box 40 CHESTERFIELD, VIRGINIA 23832 RICHARD L. HEDRICK COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Richard L. Hedrick, County Administrator Richard F. Sale, Assistant County Administrator for Development~'~~z---- February 25, 1987 European Trip/Foreign Recruitment Each Member of the Board was contacted regarding a) continuation of foreign business recruitment via contract with CONTRADE and b) European marketing trip. Three Members of the Board indicated a desire to discuss this further over lunch/dinner. One Member suggested a year's deferral because of the County's financial situation and another Member agreed with the recommendation included in your memorandum of February 3, 1987 (copy attached). pb Attachment BOARD OF SUPERVISORS HARRY G. DANIEL, CHAIRMAN DALE DISTRICT JESSE J. MAYES, VICE CHAIRMAN MATOACA DISTRICT G. H. APPLEGATE CLOVER HILL DISTRICT R. GARLAND DODD BERMUDA DISTRICT JOAN GIRONE MIDLO~'HIAN DISTRICT CHESTERFIELD COUNTY P.O. Box 40 CHESTERFIELD, VIRGINIA 23832 RICHARD L, HEDRICK COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: The Honorable Members, Board of Supervisors / Richard L. Hedrick, County Administrato~ February 3, 1987 Economic Development - Foreign Recruitment Program Chesterfield County's efforts to recruit foreign invest- ment primarily involve four separate but related activi- ties: MEDC - the ' County participates in MEDC which develops/identifies projects, both foreign and domestic, that are interested in a central Virginia location. MEDC staff works to attract the prospect to the Richmond area and staff from participating jurisdictions work to attract the prospect to their jurisdiction. CONTRADE - the County has an agreement with Contrade International of America to identify and work with foreign businesses that may be interested in a Chesterfield County location. In addition, Contrade also works to identify and expand markets in Europe for firms doing business in Chesterfield County. European Marketing Trip - this activity is designed to introduce foreign businesses possibly interested in a U.S. location to representatives of Chesterfield County in order to educate the prospective firm about the advantages of a Chesterfield County location and to demonstrate the County's interest in positively working with the firm in their location plans. Page ~wo STATE - the State Department of Economic Develop- ment actively recruits overseas prospects and has offices staffed in various overseas loca- tions. Through MEDC, the County participates in this recruiting effort by responding to businesses referred. Economic Development generally and foreign business recruitment in particular is expensive and does not guarantee quick results. However, if a community is to remain competitive, it must participate in a program if it expects to attract overseas business. Chesterfield County's contract with Contrade is for an amount not to exceed $117,000. To date, approximately $71,583.22 has been appropriated; $13,500 additional is needed to finalize the contract through its completion date of March 10, 1987. An additional contract through June 30, 1988 will cost an estimated $92,500. The proposed Spring 1987 European Marketing Trip is estimated to cost $33,000 of which $10,000 has been included in the Department of Economic Development's fiscal 1987 budget. In order to finish the current contract with Contrade plus extend the contract through June 1988, an additional $106,000 is needed; an additional $23,000 is needed for the European Marketing Trip. In summary, $129,000 is needed to continue these two activities of the Foreign Recruitment Program. To date, both of these activities have identified prospec- tive foreign firms but no firms have, as yet, relocated to Chesterfield County as a result of these activities. Assurances cannot be made that such relocations will be forthcoming through continuation of these activities. RECOMMENDATION Given the relative cost of these two activities, the uncertainty for near-term results, and other demands being placed on limited County resources, it is recommend- ed that the County: Page Three a) b) focus its foreign recruitment efforts via its participation in MEDC finish payment of its contract with cONTRADE and discontinue further association discontinue the annual European Marketing Trip. If the decision is made not to extend the contract with Contrade and to discontinue the European Marketing Trip, the $13,500 yet remaining to be appropriated in the Contrade contract could come from the Department of Economic Development as follows: $10,000 from funds appropriated for the European trip and $3,500 to be absorbed. The Director of Economic Development does not share the above recommendation. Rather, he "believes that the County has invested $137,000 in a foreign program which has not been given a reasonable period of time and opportunity to prove its worth. Given this point in time, Chesterfield's expenditure in this portion of the program is optimum. If the program is curtailed or severely limited, our investment in both time, as well as money, will have been wasted. Equally as important, European prospect contacts, and relationships with both public and private European economic development entities that have been formed through Contrade's efforts will be severely jeopardized, if not altogether lost." The County is facing some difficult decisions in the upcoming budget process. We feel that the money spent on economic development should maximize the expected return. We have many demands in our economic development program competing for limited dollars. We think we can achieve better results for the money invested by enhancing our domestic effort and working on a regional and state basis for foreign recruitment. Page Four RECOMMENDED ACTION: If the Board agrees with the above action, we will terminate the contract with Contrade. If any Board member wants to have this issue placed on the agenda for other action, we will proceed with that action. Dick Sale will contact each of you before the next agenda urocess. If you have any questions about the program, please contact Dick Sale, Stan Balderson or me. pb