Loading...
04SN0219-Nov23.pdf~-'ne !'5 '299a CPC' STAFF, S REQUEST ANALYSIS · RECOMMENDATioN .'::... ... . -.- 04SN0219 '~ 2004 BS EcOff Northwest ¢ REOUEST:. Rezoning' from` Neighb°rhood BUsineSs ReSidential ToWnh6~e~2TH). PROPOSED LAND USE: . A'residential planned yielding'a · Condition 9) - -~. . (c~2) PAGES 2 THROUGH 6. Recommend apProval for the f°ll6~gteaS°ns: - -.: ' A. The suggests the includes ~and · Pr6viding a The proposed zoning and land use provide an appropriate transition to both existing and future residential developments located south and west of Ironbridge Boulevard. The proffered conditions address the impacts of this deVelopment on necessary capital facilities, as outlined in the Zoning Ordinance and Comprehensive Plan. Specifically, the needs for roads, schools, parks, libraries and-fire stations is identified in the County's adopted Public Facilities Plan, the Thoroughfare Plan and the Capital Improvements Program and the impact .of this development.is discussed herein. The proffered conditions adequately mitigate the impact on capital facilities, thereby ensuring adequate service levels 'are' maintained as necessary to protect the health, safety and welfare of the County citizens. (NOTE: CONDITIONS MAY BE IMPOSED OR THE PROPERTY OWNER(S) MAY PROFFER OTHER CONDITIONS. THE ,CONDITIONS-NOTED WITH "STAFF/CPC" WERE AGREED UPON BY BOTH STAFF AND THE COMMISSION, CONDITIONS WITH ONLY A "STAFF" ARE RECOMMENDED SOLELY BY STAFF. CONDITIONS. WITH .ONLY A "CPC" ARE ADDITIONAL coNDITIONS RECOMMENDED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION.) PROFFERED CONDITIONS (STAFF/CPC) 1. Public water and wastewater systems shall be Used. (U) (STAFF/CPC) 2. (STAFF/CPC) 3. Except for timbering approved by the Virginia State Department of Forestry for the purpose of removing dead or diseased trees, there shall be no timbering on the Property until a land disturbance permit has been obtained from the Environmental :Engineering Department and the'approved devices have been installed. (EE) . The minimum gross floor area.of each dwelling unit shall be 1,750 square feet. (BI & P) (STAFF/CPC) 4. All exposed portions of the'foundation of each dwelling unit .shall be faced with brick or stone veneer. Exposed piers supporting front porches shall be faced withbrick or stone veneer. (BI & P) (STAFF/CPC) 5. The architectural appearance and materials shall be similar .to ~the building elevations attached as EXhibits "A" and "B', dated 8/1/04, and 'employ .the following materials: brick or stone, veneer, composition siding~ hardiplank'.or vinyl siding and 20 year asphalt shingles, Within each row. of townhonse dwelling units, a minimum of 30% of the dwelling Units shall have front elevations constructed of brick or stone, excluding windowS, doors and O architectural features. A minimum of fifty-one-percent :(51~).-of 2 ' 04SN021.9-NOV23-BOs (STAFF/CPC) (STAFF/CPC) . (STAFF/CPC) o the total units shall initially be constructed with-.a one (1) car . garage. Further, for-townhouse gr°upS-Containing six :(6).0; more :_. unitS, each unit shall initiali~ be!Constructed w~th a ~e (1)':car garage.. (BI& P) All dwelling unitS shall have ?: paved- driVeways. . The eXact-- treatment Shall be approved at.~e 'time:Of tentative [iv plan review. (P) ~ Light poles shall have a maximumheight of fifteen (15) feet; (P)~: $9,000 per dWelling unit,- if paid prior to July 1, 2004; or The amount iapproVe&by the~!B°ard of SUpervisorS'~no~!:to.. 6xCeed $9,0067pe : dWeiiing:.;~t::adjUSted UPwardby.jan'~';:: . increase in the Marshallf~fi:,S~ft-Buildin~ COst i~idex betWeen july 1V2003_andJ~ i of the fiscal 3ear in.i~h-:.} thePaymen~.is made ifpaidP~ior-;to june-30~ 2604. "-- (STAFF/CPC) (STAFF/CPC) (STAFF/CPC) 10. The maximum number of. dWqlingunitS, shall .not-exceed 1 if the. recreational amenities ouflined(in:Pr°ffered Condition provided on-site; however, the:'m~ number of unitS: may ';-be increased:, to ' '. recreational requirements outlined !8. (P) No 11. shall :be'limited to two these ..Prior to the. 'issuance of an. lane shallbe crossoVer Ironbridge ] 3 and for the benefit of Chesterfield- County, free and unrestricted; Or any addiiional fight-of, way (or easements)required, for this improvements. (T) (STAFF/CPC) (STAFF/CPC) (STAFF/CPC) (STAFF/CPC) 12. 13. 14. 15. All roads that accommodate general traffic Circulation through the property, as determined by the TranS, portation Department, Shall be designed and constructed to State standards and, taken into the State System. Setbacks from thesepublic,rOads shall be identified fOr special. access streets pursuant to 'Section 19~505(b)'°f the Zoning Ordinance. This' condition ~ may be modified by the Transportation Departmentif it is determined that the roads.or any part 'of SUch roads cannot be designated;f°r State acceptance:-For any road§ ~.Which accommodate general traffic circulation through the' devel°pmem that are not be :a:Part of the. State SyStem;a plan that insuris the continual mainten~tnce°f the ~privat~'. streets:i~hall be submitted to, and approved by:the Tr~p0i'tationDepartment. (T) AreaS. shall'be provided within-the de~elOpmem t° aceommodatea minimum ~of ten(10) overflOw par~g !spaces-generally as shown on the .cOnceptual site' pian :'Exhibit '"C', ' dated 10/8/04.' ' Such parking shall be in addition to ordinance requirements and maybe proVided Within fight of Waysubj~Ct'~:::VDOT apprOVal ot Comm6n areas. The exact treatment~andiloeation of the..par~g. shall be addressed at the time oftentative subdivisiOn review:. Within 'the area designated as¢ ~additional:- landscaPing_ areaS'' shown on.-concePtual' te.p :an ::!E~bit - C ~ dated 1:0/8/04,, landscaping in a~ldifion':~to: 0id~ee .requirements, shall-libe provided io imi~imizeview'0fthe:umts:ifrom Ir°nbfidge parkway. ~md Ironbn;dge BOulevar&:-:,m..!;exaet:apecies, size .shall be appr°ved at the' time ofsUbdi~si6n-reView. (P) (STAFF/CPC) 16. ^ fi _ (50) property along ~.the western ..- within recorded: (STAFF/CPC) 17. cThe' tentative subdivision Plat s~l:be: Submitted:for' pla, ning ommisSion review and. aPproval?~' set :forth :in' secti°n :I7~23!~°i7 the Subdivision Ordinance: :.The aPpliCant shall notifY:the iast., lmow~.President of the Arbor L~-;H0meowners Association, the Bel Arbor HomeOWners:AsSoCi~ifionl and the Ironbridge 04SN0219-NO¥23~BOS (STAFF/CPC) (STAFF/CPC) 18. 19. Parkway Owners Association on file with the Planning Department at least twenty-One (21)~ days pri°r to thel Planning COmmission's consideration of the tentative subdix4Sion~ of the time and date of tentative.plan consideration. (P) Prior to ~the issuance of building permits for more than fifty (50) dwelling-units, at a minimum, the follOwing recreational facilities shall be completed as determined by the Planning Department: a) b) c) A twenty (20) foot by forty (40).rf0ot sWilnnling pool; A 1,000 gross square .foot accessOry building for the pool; and, One (1) tennis court or basketball Court. The Planning Commission may modify this. condition at the time of tentative 'subdivision review provided an acceptable alternative agreement eXists ·to'provide for active recreational facilities off- site. (Note: · Recreational area required'by the Zoning Ordinance, Section· 19-105(o), must still be proVided On-site.) Any on-siterecreational facilities shall be subject to the folI°wing restrictionS: a) There shall be speakers. b) no .outSide public addresS~ systems .or With the excePtion -of playground areas 'which accommodate Swings, jungle, gyms,, or similar. ·such. facilities, all'outdoOr 'play fieIdsi" COurts, swimming pools and :similar active recreational areas-shall, be located-· a minimum of one-.hundred (100)feet from any: eXisting detached single family residential lot lines·.and a minimum of thirty-five (35) feet from. any existing public road. c) AnY playground areas (i.e., are~.accommodating swings, jungle gyms or similar such facilities) Shall be lo~ated a · minimum of forty (40) feet from ~1 property lines: A forty .(40) foot buffer shall be.'provid~d along the pe~eter-r~f these, recreatiOnal facilities except 'where adjacem'.m any existing or proposed-roads. This . buffer -: shall confOrm.to the requirements of the Zoning Otdinancef0r fiftY.(50) foOt buffers. 04SN0219-NOV23-BOS (STAFF/CPC) 20. d).~', .The location of all active recreational uses shall be -identified in-conjunction With-the'~submittat,of the first tentative subdivision plan. e) "In conjUnction With the recordation of any lot adjacent to active recreational area(s); Such:, area(s)-shall be i~ientifi~d. on the record plat along ~th the Proposed recreatiOnal.useS 'andrequired~bndition~., (P) ' ~ The foil°Wing shall be recorded-as restrictive, covenants in conjunction' With'-the recordation ~of .any: subdivision plat..fo~ :the Property: a. . All'lots shall:be Subject to' ali the covenants, conditionS;and .restrictions curremlyin effect for :the Ironbridge, ProPe~. Owners Association; b. The storage of bOats:and: recreatiOnal vehicles (RVs)0nthe Location: d. No-garage shall be converted to permanent living spaCe.: (P) GENERAL INFORMATION ' ~ Northwest quadrant of Ironbddge parkway and Ironbridge Boulevard., TaxlD 775-656-. 4862 (Sheet 25). . · Existing Zomg: C-2 with Conditional Use Planned Development and O~2 With Conditional~ Use 'P1anned-` el0p ' Dev ment Size: - ' . 20 acres Existing Land Use: - · Vacant 6 04SN0219,Nl Adiacent Zoning and Land Use: North - 0-2 and C-2 with Conditional Use Planned Development; Commercial or vacant South~- C:2 and R-7. with COnditional 'Use Planned: Development; Multifamily, public/semi public, commercial or vacant- East R-15 and R-7 with COnditional Use Planned Development; Single family residential or vacant West -' C-2 with Conditional Use :Planned Development; Vacant UTILITIES Public Water System: The public water system is available to serve this site. A twelve (12) inch water line extends along the western boundary of Ironbridge Boulevard, adjacent tothe request site. In 'addition, a sixteen (16) inch'water line eXtends along Ironbddge parkWay 'adjacent to this site. Use of the .publicwater system is intended and :has,be% pr0ffere~: (~roffered Condition 1) . Public Wastewater System: . The 'public wastewater system is :available tO serve this site. Existing ten (10) inch:and twelve (12) inch wastewater mink lines extend along the northern an-d.east~rn boUn~ of this site.- Use of the public w~tewater system is intended and has. beenProffered!b3 the applicant. (Proffered'COndition 1) ' ': ' '" ' ENVIRONMENTAL Drainage and Erosion: The property drains east under' Ironbfidge .Parkway into Ironbridge :Lake, whiCh/then drains via tributaries to Proctor Creek. There are cUrrently,no 'on--or, off-site er°si6n problems with none anticipated after develoPment: The property is wooded and- should not be timbered without first :0btaininga land disturbance permit froTM the Environmental Engineering DeP~ent and the appropriate erosion and sediment control devices installed. Thiswill insure, that adequate erosiOn control devices are in place pri0r to any timbering, i (Proffered Condition 2) PUBLIC FACILITIES The need for fire, school, library,-park and transportation facilities is identified 'in. the'-Public:. Facilities Plan. the Thoroughfare~Pl~ and the CaPital ImProvement pr°gram~ aud ~er det~ied-~:~ by specific departments in. the apPlicable SectiOn of this reqUest analysis: . _ . - ? 04sN02 'u. °v2 ?Os Fire ServiCe: The Public Facilities Plan-indicates that emergency services calls are expected to increase forty-five (45) percent by 201'5. Eight (8) new fire/rescue stations are recommended for . construction by 2015 in the Plan. Based on 136 dwelling units, this request will generate approximately thirty-one (31) calls for fire and rescue services'each year. The applicant has offered measures to assist in mitigating the impact of this development on fire and rescue services. (Proffered Condition 8) The Chester Fire Station, Company Number t, and Bensley-Bermuda Volunteer ResCUe Squad currently provide fire protection and emergency medical service. When.the property is developed, the number of hydrants~-'quantity of water-needed for fire protection and access requirements will be evaluated during the plans reView process. _ Schools: Approximately-seventy-four (74) school age children will be generated by this development. The site lies in the Ecoff Elementary School: attendance zone: .capacity- 759, enrollment- 798; Carver Middle SchOol zone: capacity- 1,222, enrollment-. 1,287; andClover HiltHigh School zone; capacity ~ 1,674, enrollment- 1,832. Currently, there are four (4) trailers 'at EcoffElementarySchool, nine (9) trailers at Carver Middle School and five (5) trailers at Bird High School 'This .request will, have an impact on schools. The applicant has offered measures to assist :in mitigating the imPact of this. development on school facilities. (Proffered ConditiOn 8) Libraries: Consistent with the Board of Supervisors' Poliey~ the .impaCt of development' on library services is assessed County, wide. Based on projectedPopulation growth, the Public Facilities Plan identifies a need' for additional library sPace throughout' the 'coUnty. Taking intO account the facility improvements:that have been made since the Plan W~s published, there is still an Unmet need for additiOnal, librat3r-spaCe throughout the County. Development of this property woUld most. likely impaCt..the Chester Or Central Libraries. The Plan identifies a need to add library space in this-area of the County: The applicant has offered measures to assist'in mitigating the impact of this development.on library. facilities. (Proffered Condition 8) Parks and Recreation: The Public Facilities Plan identifies the need for four (4) new regional parks. In additiOn, there is currently a shortage of community park acreagein the County. The Plan identifies a need for 625 acres of regional park. space and 116 acres ofeommunity Park spacei by 2015. The Plan also identifies the:need for neighborhOod, parks and Special Purpose parks' 8 04SN0219-NOV23-BOS and makes suggestions for their locations. The Plan also identifies the unmet demand fOr greenways and trails in the County. '"~' ~. · . The applicant has offered measures to assist in addressing.the :imPact of this proposed development on these facilifies~ (Proffered COndition 8):' Transportation: : The property (20 acres) is currently zoned Convenience BuSinesS(c-1)On:sixteen-(16) acres 'and Corporate Office (O~2). on four (4)acres,. The?applicantis requesting reZ°~g ' to Residential Townhouse(R~T~, and has proffe~eda~imum der~ity°t~ 1;36iun~s. :' · (Pr°ffered Condition 9)._B~ed On townhoUse 'irip ra~e~?degelopment coUld generate i apProximately 840 average daily~.trips. These vehicles li be Stributed; Via Iro~i Bddge Parkway, to Iron Bridge P~oad (R~ute 10) which had_ a 2002~i.traffic ,coUnt .of.26,0~0 vehicles per day. The capacity of Route t0 is. acceptable~.~evel of, Servicec)for:the. volume of traffic it currently carries. Staff recommends that all of'the-main streets that..serve:the mWnhouse Units b© accepted. into the State .Highway SYstem,':Having these streetS!atcePted~,~into the State .. HighW~y System .Will insure their' long'term maintenance;:'The:-~p~liC~t~,:hiis~prOffered: t~at:~l '- streets, which accomm°dategeneral traffic Circulati°n~,:~ii :be!i. de~igne~l:and ;ConstruCted to Staie-(i.e., the virginia Department of TranspOmfit~}; siandarcis and 'takenint0:the State System.(Proffered:,C0ndition. 12)~ The cohdition~l°~sstaffl.to?app~°ve ~a*0te!' · streets Within the townhouSe dev0!opment, ifit is~ dete~ed~iti:theye~ttbe d to State standards. If s~ approves any private str~ets;.ithe proffered ¢°nditi~n requires the developer to prOvide a plan-for their contin~.~m~intenance, iThe ap~!iC~t.- has prepared a preliminarylayoutf°r the townhom~e pr°je~(:i~Theiay°utShOWs'thatPU~!ie roads can be provided thr°ughout~the development.: ; i ....: ' : '- The property has frontage al°rig ahe Thoroughfare Plan identifies ese types of roads Should be access Will .be provided fr°nithe property 1 to Iron Bridge Parkway will be limited to two Based on the applicant's preliminary layout, ~these 'exiSting crossovers along ir-°n Bridge Parl~Way; The traffic impact of this 'development muSt constructed as a four (4)lane di~ded median at planned acceSs loeati°ns. .One anticipated to serve this development, Ironbridge Boulevard intersection, applicant has proffered to-· construct additional provide this eastbound'left turn lane. The applicant has proffered to contribute cash, in an mount consistent with the Board of Supervisors' Policy, towards:mitigating the traffic impaetofthe;residential developmem (PrOffered Condition 8)2' AS development cOntinues in!.~s Part of 'the County; i~e volumes on area roads will sUbstantially increase. Cash pmfferS alOne will not co,,er-the cost .of the improvements needed to accommodate..the:.traffc increases. No-. road-_ improVemem projects in this .Part of~the c0untY_are--~inclUded ;in the six,Year Improvement Plan. ' ~ At time of tentative subdivision review, specific reCommendationS will be provided regarding, among other'things, access and the intemal.'street network. : Financial Impact on Capital Facilities: Potemial Number of New DWelling Units · . .~ .:' 13'6' Population Increase '. - ~ ~: · ' ' ". 3'69:92· ' NumberofNew. . Students .''i".. . :' ~(!_.. : :(..: . Elementary ' ' : -. 32~64' ;: Middle - :' ~' '1-7268.." High ' "' ' ..' ~ 23:I2- ' - 0i~t7 · ' i ' ' .' - "' TOTAL ' ' :i ·" '-_ 73~44 Net CoSt for Schools ' "' · ': '-" ' ' 659}i92.. :: Net Cost'forParks "' .- i' . :'94;2~8 '~-.: . - Net Cost.for Libraries ' '. . i . 5}';000: . ' Net Cost;for Fire Stations ~' ~ ' . 54,536 ' . Average'Net C°st for Roads ' '. '.; - 558~824_ -. TOTAL NET COST :-' ::-' .~' I · -' "'~'I~4m;gO0?~l ' "' -::I . ~:'! ~'!:-I":- - . *Based on a proffered maximUm of 13.6 'units unit and rrespo ding impacts maYvary s co n , . . . As noted;' this proposed development, will facilities. calculated, the-- fiscal'impact stations at $10~425 per unit. per unit would defray the Consistent-with the Board applicant has offered cash to aSsist in.defraying the costof:this propoSed zoning ' facilities. (Proffered Condition 8) ' ". ~ . . 04SN0219_NoV23~BOs ~:'!-.~i_i" Note that circumstances relevant to this case,-as presented by .the applicant, .have been reviewed and it has been determined that .it is appropriate to accept the'maximum cash proffer in this case. LAND USE Comprehensive Plan: Lies within the boundaries of..the Ce. ntral. Area,.Plan which-suggests the property is. appropriate for communitY-scale mixed Use which inclUdes lsh°PP~gcenters, commercial and office uses and integratedt°wnhouse andmultifamily residential uses; Area Development Trends: _ surrounding properties to the north'are zoned Corporate Offi~e(Oz2)and NeighbOrho0d Commercial (C-2) and are~°Ccupied by commercial Uses.: or:are-Vacant: _ProPertieSlto~e'-: soUth are zoned Neighborho0d~COmmercial (C-2):and:Residential(R-7) ~With iC°nditi0~ Use planned Developmem. i(Part' of the Ironbfidge'::DeTcei°pment)and. are~ioceupiedibY~ multifamily residential USe,'pubiic/semi-pUblic Use,~'Commemial usei:or.are ~ac~t,_~i' prOperties t° the east are z°ned ReSidenfial.~(R- 15)::and Re_~idenfial (R-7) wi~ Condiii0~;:~; Use Planned Development: and:late ocCupied .by :singie:~:f~i7 residential Use. as Arbor Landing SUbdiVisi0n?iShgi~ family residential use:on'ghall~r.l°tS(clUster)~ of the :.Bel Arbor SubdiviSion' :°r'are. vaeant~:~i. Pi°Peflies~t°-'the West ~are::z~hed Neighb°rhood Commercial (CZ2)iwith Condifi°nai:UseplannedDex, el°Pment~o~;:°f/~e Iron, ridge Development)and~ ar~.Vacant ..... Zoning HiStory: On April 11, 1979, the pl~ng Commission, COnvenienCe DeVelopment on northwest-of its deVeloPment to' multifamily residential~'Ose~i~was-: maXimum of 659 units: request and was and attached On September 10, 1986, the Board of the -PlUg Development boundaries, uses and limited based on A portion of the of Tracts J-5 and D which permitted commercial and office uses and attached (cluster) single family residential useS~ ~ ~ On May 27, 1987, the Board o£ Supervisors, upon a fax~orable recommendation':bY the Planning. Commission, aPProved rezoning from AgriCultural (A) to Residential. ~'15) and ConVenience Business ~4)With COnditional use planned: DeveloPmem, lrezOning from .Residential (R-15) to Convenience Business (B~}) with Conditional Use 'planned Deveiopmem and amendment t°. Conditional UsePl~ed:DevelOpment (Case.86S097) relative to Tract boundaries :and.uses (Case. 8780315); A Portion of the subject property - was included in this request. The; boundaries between Tr~cts.D.& J-5 were:amend~dit0 show the proposed alignments fOr.what.are noWlronbddge BoUlevard and parkway~ request prOPerty was no' longer· designated as part.-of Tract D~ which permitted :attached- (cluster) Single family reSidential-uses but was. now entirely :Withi~ Tract- J-5 iwhiCh permitted commercial and office uses." On October 28, 1987, the Board-of Supervisors, uPon a.favomble recommendation bythe Planning .Commission, aPproved rezoning.::fromA~cUlmral_:(A).t° Office iBusines; (0)'. and. Convenience Business ¢¢1:3.with Conditional::' Use ~planned_ Devel0pmem toi:Pe~ use exceptions and exceptions m the parking~requirement~:!°n 42:4 acres portion of the request proP~.~(Case 87S 114).: A :~ed~use develoPment, with:-b on July 27, 1988, the B°ard of Planning (Ci/ses 78S105, 868097 and; 87S035) business Offices in TraCt. permitted, A uses.permitted on Density: Proffered Condition 9 a density of by Proffered Condition 1.8- reduces the maximum- recreational Development Design: - - ... Development of the property t' Residential Townhouse ~,TH).Zoning DistrictS, : To address concerns of area residents and conditions establish standards: for driveways,.. landscaping, dwelling sizes, architectural treatmem, siguage and. bUffers (Pmffered Conditions 3, 4, 5, 6,. 7, !3, 14, 15 and 16). In addition,-the'Developer has agreed:to' proVide notification of subdivisiOn, submission in eXcess of Ordinance. requirements and to submit the tentative subdivision plat for Planning Commission review and approval. (Proffered Condition 17) Recreational Amenities: In response to concerns, of area residents 'and the Bermuda District .Commissioner, Proffered Conditions 18 and 1'9 require specific actiVe :recreational amenities ;(apool;:' recreational building and a tenniSor basketball cOurt)t° be c°nStmcted :0n-Site sUbject;t0' certain developmem standards Prior to the issuance°fb~ildingPermits for mOre th~ fi~:: (50) dwelling units. Linking the timing of improvements:to the'isSuance of a:Ce~ number of building permits may caUse.tracking/enforcement~iSsues for staff. In addition, Proffered Condition 18 gives 'the.PlmgCommission authority m modify the requirement for construction of on-site recreational.lamenities at the time of tentative subdiVision review pr0Vid~d! an aCceptable .altemative.~agreement.. e>cists~ t° -provide...for these facilities off-site.- i' It. is.limPortant: to note .~at~ eVen?~il~;!:t!ie PlUg.: Co~ssibn modifies the condition, recreational area required by theZ0ning Ordinar~ce must.gfill¢ibe. proVided on-site. · ' . Restrictive Covenants: . - In response to concerns of'area _residems, Proff~red.:'COndition 20. prOVides that5 certain reStrictive covenants Will :be recorded in Subdivision plat for the prope~,- covenants and will not be: reSPonsible for; their recorded, they can be Ch~g~d~.:. Enforcement'..ot administer if the proffer oUtlined sPecificallY, theeXact ': CONCLUSIONS The proposed zoning and land use:confOrm to the Central~Area;:Planwhich suggests the property ..-' is appropriate for community, scale mixed use which includes ~h0PPing :centers, comme;cld:~l: i' office Uses, and integrated to~oUSe and multifamily reSidential USes::In additi0n;:"the:pr°p°~d.: zoning and land use provide-an:aPProPriate transition'mb~th:.::exiSting:.and~futUre developments located soUth and WeSt-0flronbridge Boulevard~ The proffered, conditions adequately address the imPact of this.de,el°proem 'onnecessary!¢apital facilities, as outlined in the Zonin~ ordinance and ComPrehefiSi~e/Pi:~._:'sPecificallY,.-~e,:~ed~ for roads; schools, parks, libradesand-'~e Statiom-:isidem[fi~'d~i:theliC°u~ty~s ad°~ed!Pi~iSlic Facilities Plan, the Thoroughfare Pl~ and the- conditions adequately mitigate the imPact 13 . ·. , . - 04SN0219-NOV23;BOS. - adequate service levels are maintained as necessary to protect.the health, safety and welfare of the County. citizens. Given theSe considerations, approval-of this request'is recommended. CASE HISTORY Planning Commission Meeting (6/15/04): At the request of the applicant the CommissiOn deferred-the request until their September 21, 2004, public' hearing. Staff (6/16/04): The applicant was adviSed'in writing that any si~ficant~newOrxevised information~m~t be re~eired no later' thanjuly 19~:2604, for ~°n~iderati6aat-thec°~sSion's S 21, 2004, public hearing.': Als0~'the applicantwas ad~Sed ;that a $250i00def~?fee must be paid prior to the CommisSion's Septemberihearing; Applicant (6/29/04): The deferral fee was paid~ Staff (7/19/04): ' To.date, no. new or revised information has been?received:. Staff, AppliCant, Area Residents andBermuda District A meeting was with area-citizens proposed proffered of the proposed Landing and Bel architectural treatment, 14- _ ....: - . .: 04SN0219_NOV23~BOS. Planning Commission Meeting (9/21/04): _. At the request of the applicant the Commission deferred the request until their October 19, 2004, public hearing. Staff (9/22/04): The applicant was advised in writing that any significant new or revised information must be received no later than September 27, 2004, for consideration at the Commission's October 19, 2004, public hearing.. Also;~e applicant :was advised that a $500:00 deferral fee must be paid prior to the 'COmmissions October-hearing.. Staff (9/27/04): Staff has commented On two (2) additional' Sets of revised draft 'Proffered conditions, however, no new or revised· information has been received. . ' Applicant (9/29/04): Revised and additional profferedCOnditions were submitted: Staff (9/29/04): ~' Provided comments to applicant' on revised and additional. Proffered conditions Staff, Applicant, Area Citizens .and the-Bermuda District Planning Commissioner (10/5/04): · ~ A meeting was held to diScuss the applicant' s request and proposed proffered condRi0ns..~ -. Citizens expressed concerns relating to the compatibility-0fth¢.:'pr°posed development;to ..'~ their subdivisions. GenerallY,-ithe group agreed that;the applicant had addressed their. previous concerns except :for. whether all units will have garages. Applicant (10/6/04): The $500.00 deferral fee was. paid. 15 04SN0219-NOV23-BOS Applicant (10/8/04): Revised and additional proffered conditions and a revised Exhibit C were submitted. Applicant (10/19/04): Revised Proffered Conditions were submitted. Planning Commission Meeting (10/19/04): The applicant accepted the recOmmendation. There was no opposition presem. On motion of-Mr. Wilson, seconded by Mr. Bass; 'the CommisSion recommended approval and acceptance of the proffered conditions on pages.2 through 6. . AYES:' Unanimous. The Board of Supervisors, on Tuesday, November'23',- 2004,' beginning at 7:00 p.m., will take' ' under consideration this request. . - 04SN0219-NOV23-BOS . · d!!I,Ill.~ j J J" "1 :[", g' tlilljjjj 04: SAIO Z. lc~' Z