04SN0273-Dec15.pdf STAFF'
REQUE
Kahn ProPerties SoUth LLC
Dale .Magisterial District
Northeast
REQUEST: Amendment to
access.
PROPOSED LAND USE:
Commercial uses are planned. Previous conditions of zoning prohibited direct access
PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION
RECOMMEND APPROVAL AND ACCEPTANCE OF THE PROFFERED CONDITION ON
PAGE 2.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Recommend denial for the following reason:
In order to reduce potential congestion and ~accidents, adequate access spacing from a
signalized intersection is critical. The property does not have sufficient frontage on Centralia
Road to provide adequate access separation from the Route 10/Centralia Road intersection.
(NOTE: CONDITIONS MAY'BE IMPOSED OR THE PROPERTY OWNER MAY PROFFER
CONDITIONS. THE CONDITIONS NOTED WITH"STAFF/CPC" WERE AGREED UPON BY
BOTH STAFF AND THE COMMISSION. CONDITIONS WITH ONLY A !'STAFF" ARE
Providing a FIRST CHOICE community through excellence in public service
GENERAL INFORMATION
Location:,
Existing Zoning:
C-2 with Conditional Use Planned Development
Size:
3.0 acres
Existing Land Use.:
Vacant
2 04SN0273-DEC15-BOS
Adjacent Zoning andLand Use:
North - A with Conditional Use'and R-9; Office (Chesterfield Historical SoCiety) and
single family residential
South - C-2 with COnditional Use Planned Development; Commercial
East ,. C-2 with Conditional Use planned Development; Vacant
West - C-3 with Conditional Use Planned Development; Commercial
UTILITIES
public water and
, of, the pub!lc water
Under Case 97sN01'65.
(Proffered- Condition 1)
ENVmoNMENT.~
This request willhave noimpaCt On these facilities.
:'PUB LI C:'F ACIL}~IE.S
:- :_~ : . :', '/.:
Fir'e SerVice:
The Airport Fire Station, 'Company Number 15, currentlY provides'fire prOtecti°n and
emergency medical service (EMS). This request will have only minimal impact on fire and
EMS. When the property is developed, the number of hydrants, quantity of water needed for
fire protection, and access requirements will be evaluated during the plans review process.
TransportatiOn:
In1997, the Board of Supervisors approved reZoning of the property from Agricultural (A) to
Neighborhood, Business (C-2) (Case 97SN0165). As part of that rezoning, the Board
accepted a proffered condition that no direct access will be provided from the property to
Centralia Road (Proffered Condition 7 of Case 97SN0165). The applicant is now requesting
to amend that proffered condition to permit direct access (right-in only) from Centralia Road
(Proffered Condition). In this proffered condition there is no commitment to construct a right
turn lane.
Development must adhere to the Zoning Ordinance relative to access and internal circulation
(Article 7). Traffic generated from development of the property will be initially distributed
along Iron Bridge Road (Route 10), which had a 2004 traffic count of 35,118 average daily
trips (ADT), and Centralia Road which had a 2002 traffic count of 9,900 ADT. The
Thoroughfare Plan identifies both Route 10 and Centralia Road as major arterials. The
property is located at the northeast comer of the Route 10/Centralia Road intersection~ and
has approximately 150 feet of frontage along Centralia Road. Typical access spacing along
roadways such as Centralia Road should be approximately 500 feet. In order to reduce
3 04SN0273-DEC15-BOS
SO~-g ~D~dG-EL250NS'eO 'e
:spuo:t& luomcloloaO([ uOa~v'
· pooqxoqq~!ou pz!luop!soz ~uoou.fpu oql '~.m &!i!q!~udmoo p~
'jo uogoolosd op!,xo:[d :~ql sloaluoo ~.tsop ptm trekI OtllJO suo!s.~o:td ~.~ olq!l~dmoo u~gt. sop
lmn~ool.ttlo:m 'ssooo~ olu!~dozdd~ q).~ uo.Buoo[ s.ttl3
pooqsoqqS!ou u!~oo :~ql solou tmkI oq& 'sam :[op!xtoo osn poxwH
oql slso~ns qo.rq~t 'tmlcI ~zoaV ImlUOD oq~ jo so!:mptmoq
:tmld oa!suoqosdmo9
loofqns aq, t13!~ ssooou
jo
U!lmlUOO aR jo ash 'pox~qs op!ao:td o~ (0910NS£6 osuD
property to the east is zoned C-2 and is Currently vacant. Property to the west is zoned and
developed for commercial uses.
Zoning History_:
On November 28, 1979, the Board of SUpervisors, upon a favorable recommendation from the
Planning Commission, approved rezoning from Residential (R-9) to Agricultural (A) with
Conditional Use to.permit office uSe on a portion of the request property and adjacent property
to the east. (Case 79S101-A)
from the
2) with Conditional Usem permit outside
97SN0165). Conditions of zoning approval he
proPertyto Centralia Road: Access'to CentraliaRoad was to-be viaa future-cross-access tothe
adjacent property to the east.
CONCLUSIONS
AS part .0f rezoning approval for the subject property (Case 97SN01,65), the BOard accepted a
proffered condition th~t~ no direct access Mll be provided from the prOPerty to centralia ROad.
Typical access Spacing'along roadWays such as Centralia Road should.be apprOXimately 500 feet.
Th~ property is located at the northeast comer of the R°nte 10/Centralia R°ad intersection, and only
has approximately 150 feet of frontage along Centralia Road.
In order to reduce potential congestion and accidents, adequate access spacing from a signalized
intersection is critical. The property does not have sufficient frontage on Centralia Road to provide
adequate access seParatiOn i'rom the Ronte 10/Centralia Road interseCtiOn:
Given these considerations, denial of this request is recommended.
CASE HISTORY
Planning Commission Meeting (7/20/04):
The applicant did not accept staff's recommendation, but did accept the Commission's
recommendation. One(l) person spoke in opposition to the request stating safety concerns and
a previous zoning agreement to provide shared access.
Mr: Litton noted the proposal Would allow for a temporary access only, would redUce
congesti°n and meets Virginia Department of Transportati°n standards,
5 04SN0273-DEC15-BOS
AYES: Unanimous.
Board of Supervisors Meeting (8/25/04):
At the request of the applicant, the BOard deferred this case to september 22, 2004.
Staff (8/26/04):
The applicant waS advised in writing that any new or revised information shOuld be submitted
fib'l~i~i?'~l:l'ah A-U~ 30, 2004, for consideration: ...... ' .......... ' at the B'oard's" ......... September 22, 2004, ........ publlc'"" '"
hearing. Also, the applicant was advised that :a $230.00 deferral fee is due prior to the public
hearing.
Staff(9~2~04):
To:date, no new information has been received nor has the deferral feebeen paid.
Staff (9/9/04):
The deferral fee was: paid.
Board of Supervisors Meeting (9/22/04):
At the request of the applicant, the Board deferred this case to December 15, 2004.
Staff (9/23/04):
The applicant was advised in writing that any significant new or revised information should be
submitted no later than October 11, 2004, for consideration at the Board's December public
hearing. The applicant was also advised that a $130.0.0 deferral fee was due.
Applicant (9/28/04):
The deferral fee was paid.
6 04SN0273-DEC15-BOS
Staff (11/23/04):
To date, no new information.has been received.
The Board of Supervisors, on Wednesday, December 15, 2004, beginning at 7:00 p.m., will take under
consideration this request.
7 04SN0273-DEC15-BOS
I
I o
!
~ENT cENTERP~
/
/
/
I
I
CONCEPTUAL PLAN
%.
N.
N.
\
\
\
\
\
\
·
·
/
·
· ·
'04 5~O Z. 73-/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/