Loading...
05SN0104-Dec15.pdfDecember 15, 2004 BS STAFF'S REQUEST ANALYSIS AND RECOMMENDATION 05SN0104 Commercial Land Development Matoaca Magisterial District North line of Hull Street Road REQUEST: Rezoning from Agricultural (A) and General Business (C-5) to Community Business (C-3) with Conditional Use Planned Development to permit exceptions to Ordinance requirements. PROPOSED LAND USE: Commercial uses are planned. An exception is requested to reduce setbacks for building, parking and driveways from thirty (30) to ten (10) feet adjacent to the Residential Townhouse (R-TH) District to the north. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION RECOMMEND APPROVAL SUBJECT TO THE CONDITION AND ACCEPTANCE OF THE PROFFERED CONDITIONS ON PAGES' 2 AND 3. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Recommend approval for the following reasons: Ao Although the Upper Swift Creek Plan suggests the property is appropriate for office uses, adjacent properties to the east and west permit commercial uses, many of a similar or greater intensity to the proposed uses. Through design controls, appropriate land use transitions will be provided between the Route '360 commercial corridor and the residential development to the north. Providing a FIRST CHOICE community through excellence in public service The requested setback exception would accommodate design standards consistent with those applied to other adjoining commercially-zoned properties. (NOTE: CONDITIONS MAY BE IMPOSED OR THE PROPERTY OWNER MAY PROFFER CONDITIONS. THE CONDITIONS NOTED WITH "STAFF/CPC" WERE AGREED UPON BY BOTH STAFF AND THE COMMISSION. CONDITIONS WITH ONLY A "STAFF" ARE RECOMMENDED SOLELY BY STAFF. CONDITIONS WITH ONLY A "CPC" ARE ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS RECOMMENDED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION.) CONDITION (STAFF/CPC) The Textual Statement dated July 7, 2004 shall be considered the Master Plan. PROFFERED CONDITIONS The property owners and applicant in this rezoning case, pursuant to Section 15.2-2298 of the Code of Virginia (1950 as amended) and the Zoning Ordinance of Chesterfield County, for themselves and their successors or assigns, proffer that the property under consideration will be developed according to the following prOffers if, and only if, the rezoning request submitted herewith is granted with only those conditions agreed to by the owners and applicant. In the event this request is denied or approved with conditions not agreed to by the owners and applicant, the proffers shall immediately be null and void and.of no further force o? effect.. (STAFF/CPC) 1. No Loading. There shall be no loading areas between any buildings and the northern property line. (P) (STAFF/CPC) 2. Public Utility. The public wasteWater system shall be utilized. (U) (STAFF/CPC) 3. Transportation. Prior to any site plan approval, one hundred (100) feet of right of way on the north side of Route 360 measured from the Centerline of that part of the roadway immediately adjacent to the property shall be dedicated free and unrestricted to and for the benefit of Chesterfield County. Direct access from the Property to Route 360 shall .be limited to one entrance/exit. This entrance/exit, shall be designed to permit, right tums only. 'The exact location of this entrance/exit shall be determined by the Transportation Department. Co To provide an adequate roadway system, the owner/developer shall be responsible for the following: 2 05SN0104-DEC15-BOS construction of an additional lane of pavement along Route 360 for the entire property frontage; ii. construction of additional pavement along Route 360 to provide a separate right mm lane at the approved entrance/exit, based on Transportation Department standards; and dedication to Chesterfield County, free and unrestricted, of any additional right-of-way (or easements) required for the improvements identified above. do Prior to any site plan approval, a phasing plan for the required road improvements, as identified in condition 3.c., shall be submitted to and approved by the Transportation Department. (T) GENERAL INFORMATION Location: North line of Hull Street Road, east of Cosby Road. Tax IDs 718-671-3035 and 4837 (Sheet 15). Existing Zoning: A and C-5 Size: 1.5 acres Existing Land Use: Single family residential or vacant Adjacent Zoning and Land Use: North South East West - R-TH with COnditional Use Planned Development; Vacant - A; Single family residential or vacant - C-5; Commercial - C-3; Office UTILITIES Public Water System: 3 05SN0104-DEC15-BOS A twenty-four (24) inch water 'line extends along the. north side of Hull Street Road within an easement across this site. Use of the public water system to serve this site is required by County Code.~ Public Wastewater System: There is an existing eight (8) inch wastewater collector line that terminates approximately 260 feet south of Manor Gate Place, at a point approximately 990 feet north of the request site. There are plans to extend the public wastewater system in conjunction with the development of The Villas at Dogwood and upon completion; the public wastewater sYstem will be approximately 100 ~'eet north of this site. Use of the public wastewater system is intended. (Proffered Condition 2) ENVIRONMENTAL Drainage and Erosion: This request will have a minimal impact-upon these facilities. PUBLIC FACILITIES Fire Service: The Clover Hill Fire Station, Company Number 7, currently provides fire protection and emergency medical service. This i~equest will have minimal impact, fire and EMS. When the property is deVeloped~ the number of hydrants, quantity'of water needed for fire protection, and access requirements will be evaluated during the plans review process. Transportation: The subject property consists of 0.7 acre currently zoned Agricultural (A) and 0.8 acre currently zoned General Business: (C-5). The property is located On the north side of Hull Street Road (Route 360) between Woodlake Village Parkway and Cosby Road. The applicant, is requesting rezoning of.the.entire property to Community Business (C-3). This request will not limit development to a specific land-use; therefore, it is difficult to anticipate traffic generation. Based on fast food restaurant with drive, through window trip rates, development could generate 2,500 average' daily trips. Traffic generated by this development will initially be distributed along Route .360, which had a 2003 traffic volume of 44,941 vehicles per day between Woodlake Village Parkway and Winterpock Road. Based on the current volume of traffic during peak hours, Route 360 in this area is functioning at an acceptablelevel (Level of Service D). 4 05SN0104-DEC15-BOS Development must adhere to the Development Standards Manual in the Zoning Ordinance relative to access and internal circulation (DiVision 5). Access to major arterials, such as Route 360, should be controlled. The applicant has proffered that direct access from the property to Route 360 will be limited to one entrance/exit (Proffered Condition 3b). This access was constructed on that part of the property cUrrently zoned C-5 in conjunction with development of the approved, mini-storage facility on the adjacent property to the east. The applicant owns additional property to the east and plans to construct another entrance/exit that will be also be designed to serve this property. The traffic impact of this' development must be addressed. The applicant has proffered to: 1) construct an additional lane of pavement along Ronte 360 for the entire property frontage, and 2) constmct'a separate right turn lane along Route 360 at the approved access based on TransportatiOn Department standards (Proffered Condition 3c). If an additional access is constructed to serve the adjacent property to the east, then constmction of the separate right mm lane is not anticipated to be warranted. At time of site plan review, specific recommendations will be made regarding intemal circulation. LAND USE Comprehensive Plan: Lies within the 'boundaries. of. the Upper Swift Creek Plan' which suggests the property is appropriate for office uses. The property is bound by General 'Business (C-5)' zoning to the .east and Community Business (C-3) zoning to the westthat permit many commercial uses of similar or greater intensity to the proposed uses. Assuch, the requested C-3 zoning would be appropriate in maintaining consistency with existing land use patterns provided, through design controls, appropriate land use transitions will be provided-between the Route 360 commercial corridor andthe residential development to the north: Area Development Trends: Property to the north is zoned Residential Townhouse (R-TH) and is under plans review for The' Villas at DogwoOd park Subdivision. Properties along the south 'line of Hull Street Road are currently zoned Agricultural (A) and occupied by single family residences or remain vacant. Property to the east is zoned General Business (C~5) and is developed as part of Woodlake Commercial. Park -and prOperty "to'the west is 'zon~d"Community Business (C-3) and is developed as a dental office.. It is anticipated that any infill development would be consistent with the adjoining Commercial development pattern While providing appropriate transition adjacent't0 the fUtUre reSidential'development to the north. 5 05SN0104-DEC15-BOS Zoning History: The portion of the subject property that is currently zoned General Business (C-5), along with the adjoining C-5 properties to the east, were zoned onor before 1972, predating the adoption of the Upper Swift Creek.Plan in 1991. Site Design: Currently, the request property lies within an Emerging Growth Area and the Route 360- Corridor West Design Area. Development of the. site must conform to the requirements of the Zoning Ordinance which address access, parking, landscaping, architectural treatment,.sign~, buffers, utilities and screening of dumpsters, loading areas, and setbacks, as noted herein. Architectural Treatment: The subject property lies within the Route 360 Corridor West in the mixed use corridor area of the Upper Swift" Creek Plan. All buildings must be compatible with residential architecture. This property.is:to be' developed as part of the adjacent commercial project to the north and east. Within a pi?oject, compatibility may be achieved through the use of a residential architectural-style uSing materialS, fenestration, scale and other architectural features appropriate to that style. Building Setbacks: Currently, the OrdinanCe requires a 'minimum'thirty (3'0)foot side yard setback for buildings, parking and driveways adjacent to a Residential Townhouse (R-TH) District. This setback would apPly alOng the northern boundary of the subject property. The applicant has requested a reduction in this setback to a-minimum often (10)feet, being the same standard applied to-C~3 Districts when-adjacent to O,-C or I Districts. This is consistent with the setback applied to the adjacent-Woodlake Commercial Park to the east, which received site plan.approval at a time when theR-T~H property was-zoned C-3. Further, conditions of zoning.apPlicable to the R-TH: property, require a fifty (50)-foot landscaped setback between-thenorthem boundary _-of the subject' property and the proposed units within the- R~TH, tract' prOViding transition-betWeen~-,these -propoSed commercial and residential~uses. Loading Areas: The Ordinance requires that sites be designed and buildings oriented so that loading areas are screened from the Residential Townhouge~ (R-TH) District to-the north and from public fights of way. To further address transition fromthis development to-the future adjacent townhouse project, prOffered Condition 1 requires that no :loading areas be permitted' between 'any -buildings 'and the'. noi'thern property line,' thereby' having the 6 05SN0104-DEC15-BOS buildings provide both visual and spacial separation between the loading areas and the residential units. Buffers: With the approval of this request, outside storage would be permitted as a restricted use. OUtside storage areas must not exceed ten (10) percent of the gross floor area for the principal use and must be screened from view of adjacent properties which have no such areas and public rights of way. Adjacent property to the north is zoned Residential Townhouse (R-TH). The Ordinance requires a minimum seventy-five (75) foot buffer along this northern property boundary of the request site. It is anticipated that, at the time of site plan review, the developer will be seeking a modification to this buffer requirement, which the Planning Commission may grant under certain circumstances. CONCLUSIONS Although the Upper Swirl Creek Plan suggests the property-is appropriate for office uses, adjacent properties to the east and west permit commercial uses, many of a similar or greater intensity to the proposed uses. Further through design controls, appropriate land use transitions will be provided between the Route 360-commercial.corridor and the residential development to the north. The requested setback exception would accommodate design .standards consistent with those applied to other adjoining commercially~zoned properties. Given these considerations, approval of this request is recommended. CASE HISTORY Planning Commission Meeting (11/16/04): The applicant accepted the recommendation. There was no opposition present: On motiOn of Mr. Bass, seconded by Mr. Litton' the Commission recommended approval subject to the condition and acceptance of the proffered conditions on pages 2 and 3. AYES: Unanimous. The Board of Supervisors, on Wednesday, December 15, 2004, beginning at 7:00 p.m., will take under consideration this request. 7 05SN0104-DEC15-BOS TEXTUAL STATEMENT We are requesting to rezone the Property' from C-5 and A to C-3 with CUPD for relief from the side yard setback. Specifically, we are requesting to reduce the side yard setback on the northern side of the Property from 30 (thirty) feet as required to 10 (ten) feet. JUSTIFICATION While the land use plan suggests mixed use corridor/office, the Property .is adjacent to C-3 and C-5 zoning and is being incorporated into the new shopping center being developed to the east, thus, the request for retail uses is. consistent with area development. Furthermore, the Applicant has included in the request a portion of the unconditional C-5 zoned property to the. east in order that.the conditions and requirements that would be on the sm all A-zoned parcel may be spread over part of the unconditional C-5 property to provide additional assurances of quality deVelopment. The request to reduce the sideyard setback is in keeping with what was approved on the adjacent C-5 shopping center parcel to the east. That. center was developed when the adjacent Margaret Cross parcel ~was zoned commercial and the setback requirements were different. Since then, the Margaret Cross property was rezoned to residential and the requffed setbacks for the remainder of the proposed shoppingcenter changed. In order to continue the development of the shopping center in a coordinated fashion, the reduction to the required side yard setback on the northern-property lineis reasonable. The Applicant will continue the landscaping along the .northern property line as has been previously approved by the County for the Applicant's adjacent property. That property line abuts a road serving adjacent residential property; the houses on the other side of the road do not face the road. #579887 vl 028091.00002