The URL can be used to link to this page

01/10/01 PacketCHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Meeting Date: January 10, 2001 Item Number: 1.A. Subject: Election of Chairman and Vice Chairman County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Summary of Information: The Board's first order of business is the election of Chairman and Vice Chairman for 2001. The County Administrator presides over the meeting until the election of Chairman. Nominations do not require a second. Lisa H. Elko Attachments: [~-] Yes No Title: Clerk to the Board # ~01 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Meeting Date: January 10, 2001 Item Number: i.B. Subject: Nomination/Appointments to Various Boards and Commissions County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Summary of Information: Each year at the organizational meeting, the Board must make a number of appointments to various Boards and Commissions. In addition, there are a number of appointments to committees appointed by the Chairman. See attached list. Preparer: ~ tL~,.~ ~~ Lisa H. Elko Attachments: ]Yes No Title: Clerk to the Board BOARD APPOI~MENTS CURRENT MEMBERS TRI-CITIES AREA METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION (CRATER MPO) Term would be one year beginning January 1, 2001 and expiring December 31, 2001. Mrs. Renny B. Humphrey METROPOLITAN RICHMOND CONVENTION & VISITORS BUREAU (MRC&VB) Appointment is for term expiring 12/31/00 Mrs. Renny B. Humphrey Term would be for one year beginning January 1, 2001 and expiring December 31, 2001 (Rules Call for an Elected Official to Serve as Representative) (Change in policy no longer calls for the Chief Elected Official to serve.) CAPITAL AREA WORKFORCE INVESTMENT POLICY BOARD AND CRATER WORKFORCE INVESTMENT POLICY BOARD Unspecified Term Mr. Bradford Hammer CARPENTER CENTER BOARD OF DIRECTORS Ex-officio capacity Mr. J. L. McHale, III MAYMONT FOUNDATION Term would be one year beginning January 1, December 31, 2001. Mr. Kelly Miller 2001 and expiring SOCIAL SERVICES Mr. Jack McHale is not eligible to be reappointed - Mr. Miller Recommended Term would be for three years beginning January 1, 2001 and expiring December 31, 2003 004 CHAIRMAN' S APPOINTMENTS CURRENT MEMBERS BUDGET AND AUDIT COMMITTEE Unspecified Term Mr. J. L. McHale, III Mr. Arthur S. Warren COUNTY EMPLOYEE BENEFITS COMMITTEE Unspecified Term Mr. Edward B. Barber Mrs. Renny Bush Humphrey DRUG COURT COMMITTEE Unspecified Term Mr. Kelly E. Miller Mr. J. L. McHale, III SCHOOL BOARD LIAISON COMMITTEE Unspecified Term Mr. Arthur S. Warren Mr. Edward B. Barber SOLID WASTE ADVISORY COMMITTEE Appointment is for term expiring 12/31/00 Mrs. Renny Bush Humphrey Mr. Kelly E. Miller Term would be a one year term beginning January 1, 2001 and expiring December 31, 2001. COALITION OF HIGH GROWTH COMMUNITIER Unspecified Term Mr. Jack McHale recom~nended CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Meetin~ Date: January 10, 2001 Item Number: 1.c. Subject: Adoption of Procedures of the Board of Supervisors Governing Meetings in 2001 County Administrator's Comments: County Ad mi nistrator: Board Action Requested: Adoption of Procedures of the Board of Supervisors for 2001 Summary of Information: Each year the Board of Supervisors adopts procedures governing meetings at the organizational meeting in January. Staff recommends no changes this year. Preparer: Steven L. Micas Attach ments: Title: County Attorney 0800:51755.1 (538.21) 2001 PROCEDURES OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Chesterfield County, Virginia 2888 2001 PROCEDURES OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of the County of Chesterfield in accordance with Section 3.4 of the County Charter that the following rules of procedures shall govern the conduct of meetings and work sessions of the Board of Supervisors during the 2000 2001 calendar year. Presiding Officer Section 1. The Board's parliamentary procedures shall be Robert's Rules of Order, a g/lam~al of General Parliamentary Law, to the extent compatible with law and the historical practices of the Board of Supervisors. The County Attorney shall act as parliamentarian to the Board. Any questions involving the interpretation or application of Robert's Rules shall be addressed to the County Attorney. Section 2. The Chairman, or the Vice-Chairman, or in their absence, the most senior member of the Board alphabetically, shall preside at all meetings of the Board, and on the appearance of a quorum shall call the meeting to order and the Board shall then proceed with /ts business. Section 3. The presiding officer shall preserve order and decorum. He may speak, make motions, and vote on all questions and he shall decide questions of order and procedure. The Chairman may set reasonable time limits for speakers and public hearings; provided that by majority vote the Board may reject such time limits. Quorum Section 4. A quorum shall consist of at least three members of the Board. A majority of a quorum shall be sufficient to carry any question except tax issues, incurring of debt and appropriations in excess of $500.00 all of which shall require a majority of the full Board for adoption. No Board member is required to vote on any question, but an abstention, although not a vote in favor of carrying a question, shall be counted as a vote for the purpose of determining a quorum. A tie vote shall defeat the motion, resolution or issue voted on, provided that all zoning cases must be disposed of by a motion approved by a majority of those voting. An abstention defeats a motion requiring a unanimous vote. The Board shall not designate a tie breaker pursuant to {} 15.2-1421 of the Code of Virginia. 0800:538.21 (Adopted at 01/10/01 B/S mtg) Order of Business Section 5. The order of business at a regular meeting of the Board shall be as follows beginning at 4:00 p.m. or an alternative specified meeting time: (a) Approval of minutes of the previous meeting. Reading of the minutes shall be automatically dispensed with. (b) County Administrator's comments. (c) Board Committee reports. (d) Requests to postpone action, additions, deletions or changes in the order of presentation with respect to any matter on the agenda. (e) Special resolutions of recognition. (f) Work sessions. (g) Deferred agenda items not requiring a public hearing. (h) New County business not requiring a public hearing including deferred and new appointments. (i) Hearings of citizens on unscheduled matters involving the services, policies and affairs of the county government or claims against the Board. (j) Reports. (k) Dinner at 5:00 p.m. (1) Non-sectarian invocations followed by the pledge of allegiance at 7:00 p.m.. (hq) Special resolutions of recognition not heard at the afternoon session. (n) Deferred public hearings. (o) Zoning and mobile home public hearings placed on the consent agenda by the Planning Department. 0800:538.21 (Adopted at 01/10/01 B/S mtg) (p) Hearings of citizens on unscheduled matters or claims not heard at the afternoon session. (q) Remaining public hearings or zoning public hearings based on appropriate meeting date. (r) Adjournment. The Board shall confine their decisions to the matters presented on the agenda. Section 6. Any citizen desiring to present any matter concerning the services, policies and affairs of the County or claims against the Board shall be allotted appropriate time to present his case by the presiding officer. The presentation of the claim shall not exceed 30 minutes and each speaker may not exceed 5 minutes. Every citizen desiring to present a matter to the Board shall by noon on the 6th calendar day prior to the meeting notify the Clerk of his intent to speak and the topic. The notice shall describe in detail the nature of the issue to be presented to the Board and the remedy, if any, that the citizen will ask of the Board. No citizen shall speak on any matter of business which is a subject on the Board's agenda for that day. Citizens may not yield time to another speaker. After the County Administrator submits a budget, comments on the budget shall be confined to advertised public hearings until the budget is adopted. Persons appearing before the Board will not be allowed to: (a) Campaign for public office; (b) Promote private business ventures; (c) Address matters within the administrative province of the County Administration; (d) Engage in personal attacks; (e) Use profanity or vulgar language; (f) Address pending litigation; or (g) Speak to matters previously presented to the Board by the speaker unless the County Administrator has made a recommendation. 0800:538.21 (Adopted at 01/10/01 B/S mtg) Section 7. Any person speaking to a matter shall be limited to such period of time as shall be allotted by the presiding officer when necessary to preserve order and the efficiency of the meeting. The Board may accept written comments in lieu of oral statements. Any person may publicly speak to an item on that meeting's "Consent Agenda" for up to three minutes so long as the Board votes to remove a consent item from the consent agenda for public comment. Section 8. The order of business at a special meeting shall follow that of a regular meeting to the greatest extent possible. Minutes of Meeting Section 9. The Clerk of the Board shall prepare and maintain adequate minutes of the proceedings of the Board in accordance with the requirements of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended. Each recorded vote shall indicate how each member of the Board voted. Preparation of minutes will not include every aspect of the Board's meetings relating specifically to discussion and debate but will include all significant events relating to official action. Minutes shall be included as part of the agenda package for the subsequent meeting of the Board. Section 10. The Board may correct its minutes after approval of the minutes only upon a clear showing that a clerical or administrative mistake was made. Agenda Section 11. The County Administrator shall prepare an agenda for each regular or special meeting of the Board on which shall appear the title of each matter on which action is to be taken at that meeting. The agenda for each regular meeting shall (a) be prepared at least five days prior to the meeting, (b) be promptly mailed or delivered to each member of the Board or placed in the repository assigned to such Board member, and (c) be distributed to appropriate officers and employees of the county government and members of the public and media requesting copies. Section 12. Upon a majority vote of the Board of Supervisors any item may be added when the agenda is voted on and the ChailTnan may allow any agenda item to be called out of sequence. 0800:538.21 (Adopted at 01/10/01 B/S mtg) Section 13. Any matter not on the scheduled agenda, may be heard after the agenda has been approved by the Board only upon the unanimous vote of the Board members present. Any such matter must be of an emergency nature, vital to the continued proper and lawful operation of the County. Section 14. No matter on the scheduled agenda shall be considered after 11:00 p.m. without the unanimous consent of the Board. Any matter not heard shall be automatically continued to the next scheduled meeting of the Board. Motions Section 15. When a motion is under debate no additional motions may be made except a motion to withdraw, to defer, to substitute, or to amend. If the maker of a motion and the member seconding the motion agree, a motion may be amended or withdrawn. Such motions shall take precedence in the order listed above. Only one substitute motion shall be in order for a principal motion. All motions to defer shall be to a date certain. Prior to voting on a motion to defer, the Board shall hear public comments on the issue of deferral if the scheduled item requires a public hearing. Reconsideration of Ordinances, Resolutions and Motions Section 16. Any vote by a member of the Board is final once cast. Planning Commission decisions are final once made. No ordinance, resolution or motion previously voted upon by the Board shall be brought forward for reconsideration during the same meeting of the Board. Debate Section 17. Each member of the Board may participate in discussion of any issue only after being recognized by the Chairman. The Chairman shall not recognize a motion to "Call the Question" until every member desiring to speak has had a chance to speak. At the conclusion of debate, the question shall be called and no further debate shall be in order. Requests relating to criticisms or concerns regarding the administration of the County, except when related to agenda items, shall not be presented or raised at a meeting of the Board unless first submitted in writing to the County Administrator and unless his response fails to resolve the issue. 0800:47742.1 5 Regular Meetings Section 18. Each year at its organizational meeting the Board shall set the regular meeting times and dates for the following year provided, however, that the Board shall meet at least once each month. Whenever the regularly scheduled meeting date shall fall on a legal holiday, the regular meeting of the Board shall be held on the following day in accordance with § 15.2- 1416 of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended. The Chairman may cancel any meeting because of inclement weather and should reschedule any canceled meeting at the earliest possible date by sending written notice to each member of the Board. Special Meetings Section 19. Special meetings of the Board may be called by two members of the Board or the Chairman in accordance with §§ 15.2-1417 and 15.2-1418 of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended. Upon making such request the Clerk shall specify the matters to be considered and shall notify in writing all members of the Board and the County Attorney immediately. The meeting may be held only if waivers are signed by every member of the Board and the County Attorney or if every member and the County Attorney attend the special meeting. Appointments Section 20. Appointments to committees of the Board and to authorities, boards and commissions shall be made only by resolution adopted by a majority of the full Board at a meeting subsequent to the meeting when the name has been offered to the Board for consideration. Prior to consideration of the nomination, the nominee shall be notified to determine his willingness to serve and to determine if he meets the minimum qualifications for such appointment. Committees Section 21. The Board may create committees and shall appoint members to such committees. Committees may hold hearings and perform such other duties as may be prescribed. A committee may be instructed concerning the form of any report it shall be requested to make and a time may be fixed for submission of any report. 0800:47742.1 6 Zoning Section 22. With the exception of zoning cases which have been scheduled for a public hearing before both the Chesterfield Planning Commission and the Board of Supervisors in the same month, no zoning case shall be considered by the Board of Supervisors if amendments, changes, withdrawals, or proffers have been submitted by the applicant after the case has appeared in the newspaper pursuant to the required publication. All such cases shall be deferred to the next appropriate Board meeting for consideration after proper readvertising. Section 23. If a majority of the Board is not reelected, no zoning case shall be considered by the Board of Supervisors after November, 2003 until the organizational meeting in January, 2004 unless such delay would exceed twelve months for that case. Amendment of Rules Section 24. The rules of procedure of the governing body may be amended at any time during the year by a unanimous vote of the full Board. Section 25. The Board of Supervisors may suspend the application of any section of these rules by a unanimous affirmative vote of all Board members present at any time during the agenda. Section 26. A Deputy Sheriff shall serve as Sergeant at Arms. 0800:47742.1 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Meeting Date: January 10, 2001 Item Number: l.D. Subject: Setting of Regular Meeting Dates for 2001 County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Summary of Information: The Board should establish its schedule for regular meeting dates and times for 2001. Staff recommends approval of the attached schedule. Staff may request earlier meeting times for work sessions or budget meetings. Lisa H. Elko Attachments: -] Yes No Title: Clerk to the Board BOARD OF SUPERVISORS REGULAR MEETING DATES FOR 2001 January 10, 2001 at 4:00 p.m.* January 24, 2001 at 4:00 p.m. February 21, 2001 at 4:00 p.m. February 28, 2001 at 4:00 p.m. March 14, 2001 at 4:00 p.m. March 21, 2001 at 4:00 p.m. April 4, 2001 at 4:00 p.m. April 25, 2001 at 4:00 p.m. May 23, 2001 at 4:00 p.m. June 20, 2001 at 3:00 p.m. July 25, 2001 at 3:00 p.m. August 22, 2001 at 3:00 p.m. September 12, 2001 at 4:00 p.m. September 26, 2001 at 4:00 p.m. October 10, 2001 at 4:00 p.m. October 24, 2001 at 4:00 p.m. November 14, 2001 at 4:00 p.m. November 28, 2001 at 4:00 p.m. December 19, 2001 at 4:00 p.m.** * 4:00 p.m. start time was the preference of the majority of the Board members ** Third Wednesday (to allow time to advertise zoning cases) Special Meeting Dates for 2001 Budget Public Hearing - March 21, 2001 at 7:00 p.m. Public Meeting Room CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Meetin~l Date: January. 10, 2001 Subiect: County Administrator's Comments Item Number: 3. County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Summary of Information: The Chesterfield_~.0mmunitv Services Board_has been informed by CARF (The Rehabilitation Accreditation Commission), that all. mental health, mental ret_ardatio.p and substance abuse Droaram~ and se~-vlCes have been accredited ~r a ~erlod 0-f thre~/"~: including the'""~vis'~on~' of: Psychosocial ~ehaDiii~atlon; Integrated Behavioral Health' Programs; Employment Services; and, Community Services. This accreditation outcome represents, the hi~hes~ level of accreditation.,' markin--~~e- sec'~nd cons~utiy~ ~-year accreditation awarded to thee Chesterfield ~-S~ by CARF, an international accred[tat!on .~od~. According to Donald E. Galvin, Ph.D., P~ident an~ CEO of CARF, "the Chesterfield Community Services Board has put itself through a rigid peer review process and has demonstrated that its programs and services are of the highest quality, measurable, and accountable.,, This accreditation extends through October 2003, and is a noted achievement and indication of the dedication and commitment of the Chesterfield CSB to improve the quality of lives of coUnty residents who receive behavioral health services. Preparer: /fx'/~Z~//: ~ Title: Director /.~ G~0rg~Braunstein~ Executive AEachmentS: [ [ Yes No # ~_~ CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 2 Meeting Date: January 10, 2001 Item Number: 7. Subject: Work Session to Provide Board of Supervisors Information Regarding the Neighborhood Strategy County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Summary of information; The Neighborhood Strategy Team was appointed by the County Administrator in 1999 to focus on the development of a strategy for the County regarding neighborhoods and their future health. The Neighborhood Strategy Team concludes: The County's communities are relatively healthy with few blighted areas: the goal is to maintain that health. The health of communities is a major County-wide planning issue with major economic impact. Programs to maintain the health and vitality of County communities will yield major community and countywide benefits, "An ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure." During the work session the following highlights regarding recommendations of the Neighborhood Strategy will be covered. Neighborhood Strategy Recommendations: the Mobile Home Park Improvement Enforce the Code Zoning Ordinance Amendment Proposal to redevelop most blighted trailer courts Preparer: ~ ~'. (~Lo~, Title: Dkector of Planning Thomas E. Jac6bson C:DATA/AGENDA/2001/JAN1001.4/GOK Attachments: I I Yes No # CHESTERFIELD COUNTY · BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 2 of 2 Meeting Date: January 10, 2001 Item Number: Summary of Information: (Continued) Community Support Teams - Realignment of County staff community organizations Training and support beginning in early 2001 to support Proactive Code Enforcement Other Support Actions Community articles in Community Shopper Community/Neighborhood Website State of the County's.Communities annual report Community Policing: incrementally expanded program Identify focal points for communities Landscaping/streetscape improvements along major roads and gateways Tax Incentives New industrial/commercial structures incentive program Continue residential incentive program Blight Eradication Additional building inspectors Demolition Program: These recommendations should be implemented incrementally over a period of time. For next year staff is recommending, through the Budget Process, the following: Create a Demolition Fund in the CIP Expansion of the Proactive Code Enforcement Program Start a Blight Eradication Program 1998 2OOO 2002 2OO4 2OO6 2OO8 2010 2012 2014 2016 2018 2020 Assesments 0 0 0 0 C~ C) C) C) C} C~ 0 C} C} 0 0 0 0 0 0 I I I I I I I I I I I I I ~ I I I I I I I [ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I [ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I · · · ~~> ~o 0 ~ 0 ~ '('D o ~ o ~ 0 0 ~ CD CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Meetin~l Date: Janua~ 10, 2001 Item Number: 6. Subject: Resolution Recognizing ~he Members ~ the Tax Structure Committee County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Adoption of the attached resolution Summary of Information: The Tax Structure Committee worked diligently for ten months to recommend a stable tax structure that fairly balances the responsibility for service delivery among all segments of the community. The Committee submitted its final report to the Board on November 21, 2000. Rebecca T. Dickson Title: Director, Budget & Management Attachments: Yes ~ No RECOGNIZING MEMBERS OF THE TAX STRUCTURE COMMITTEE WHEREAS, in January 2000, the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors appointed a Tax Structure Committee to study the County's current tax structure to ensure its equity, viability and appropriateness for the future; and WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors desired that the Committee's membership represent the interests of citizens and businesses throughout the County and appointed members from a variety of backgrounds, avocations, and community groups; and WHEREAS, the Committee was charged with recommending a stable tax structure that fairly balances the responsibility for service delivery among all segments of the community; and WHEREAS, the Committee's recommendations were to be consistent with the County's economic development priorities; and WHEREAS, the Committee's recommendations were to be revenue-neutral and could include items that would require General Assembly approval; and WHEREAS, after an initial data gathering process, the Committee divided into three subcommittees to examine business taxes and economic development strategies, to review individual and residential taxes, and to provide strategic planning for the Committee; and WHEREAS, the Committee and subcommittees met biweekly from February 2000 to November 2000 and worked diligently for those ten months evaluating and considering the current tax structure and potential recommendations; and WHEREAS, the Committee held two public hearings to receive citizen input on preliminary ideas of the Committee and then presented its findings and recommendations to the Board of Supervisors on November 21, 2000. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors expresses its gratitude and appreciation to the members of the Tax Structure Committee and publicly recognizes the members of the Committee: Mr. Gary Thomson, Mr. Dick Arnold, Mr. Bill Baxter, Mr. Larry Belcher, Dr. Walter Beam, Mr. Ike Carmichael, Mr. Steven Erie, Mr. Robert Franklin, Mr. Frank Genovese, Ms. Patricia Harper, Mr. Mark Long, Mr. Robert Palmer, Mr. David Robinson, Ms. Susan Sprigg, and Mr. James Traudt for their diligent work on and their dedicated service to the citizens of Chesterfield County. AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that a copy of this resolution be presented to the members of the Tax Structure Committee and that this resolution be permanently recorded among the papers of this Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County, Virginia. CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 2 Meeting Date: Januazlz 10, 2001 Item Number: ., Subject: Deferred Streetlight Installation Approvals County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: This item requests Board approval of Deferred Streetlight Installations in the Bermuda District. Summary of Information: Streetlight requests from individual citizens or civic groups are received in the Department of Environmental Engineering. Staff requests cost quotations from Virginia Power for each request received. When the quotations are received, staff re-examines each request and presents them at the next available regular meeting of the Board of Supervisors for consideration. Staff provides the Board with an evaluation of each request based on the following criteria: o Streetlights should be located at intersections; There should be a minimum average of 600 vehicles per day (VPD) passing the requested location if it is an intersection, or 400 VPD if the requested location is not an intersection; Petitions are required and should include 75% of residents within 200 feet of the requested location and if at an intersection, a majority of those residents immediately adjacent to the intersection. Richard M. McElfish Attachments: CONTINUED NEXT PAGE Title: Director, Environmental Engineering Yes ~--~ No CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 2 of 2 Summary of Information: (Continued) Cost quotations from Virginia Power are valid for a period of 60 days. The Board, upon presentation of the cost quotation may approve, defer, or deny the expenditure of funds from available District Improvement Funds for the streetlight installation. If the expenditure is approved, staff authorizes Virginia Power to install the streetlight. A denial will cancel the project and staff will so notify the requestor. A deferral will be brought before the Board again when specified. BERMUDA DISTRICT: In the Southcreek Subdivision - The homeowners association has notified this office of their priority of installation for their requested streetlights (listed below). Virginia Power cost noted are the latest cost estimates for these projects, effective starting December 28, 2000. Staff notes that these costs reflect increases over those reported at the May 24, 2000, Board meeting of $1,234.09 for the Jumping Mallard Place project and $1,321.31 for the Broadbill Drive project. Deferred from the May 24, 2000 meeting, two streetlight installations in the Southcreek Subdivision: Jumping Mallard Place, in the cul-de-sac, South Creek Cost to install light: $ 6,554.81 Does not meet minimum critera for intersection or vehicles per day Broadbill Drive, in the cul-de-sac, South Creek Cost to install light: $ 7,038.85 Does not meet minimum critera for intersection or vehicles per day For information regarding available balances in the District Improvement Fund accounts, please reference the District Improvement Fund Report. STREETLIGHT REQUEST Bermuda District Request Received: May 1, 1998 Estimate Requested: May 4, 1998 Estimate Received: November 4, 1998 NAME OF REQUESTOR: ADDRESS: Days Estimate Outstanding: 184 Cost to install light: $ 6,554.81 Sandra Donohoo Board of Directors, Southcreek Homeowners Association 1701 Southcreek Drive Colonial Heights, VA 23834 REQUEST IS NOT AT AN INTERSECTION. REQUESTED LOCATION IS: Jumping Mallard Place, in the cul-de-sac, South Creek POLICY CRITERIA: Intersection: Vehicles per Day: Petition: Not Qualified, location is not an intersection Not Qualified, less than 400 VPD Qualified Staff or Requestor Comments: No requestor comments. Staff notes that this project was originally presented to the Board on November 24, 1998. It was deferred at the August 25, 1999, October 27, 1999, and May 24, 2000, meetings. Representatives from the subdivision homeowners association have identified this location as their number 1 priority. Staff notes that the cost for this installation has increased by $1,234.09 since the May 24, 2000, Board of Supervisors meeting. This location is not a school bus stop. STREETLIGHT REQUEST Bermuda District Request Received: May 1, 1998 Estimate Requested: May 4, 1998 Estimate Received: November 4, 1998 Days Estimate Outstanding: Cost to install light: $ 7,038.85 NAME OF REQUESTOR: Sandra Donohoo ADDRESS: 184 Board of Directors, Southcreek Homeowners Association 1701 Southcreek Drive Colonial Heights, VA 23834 ~--~ REQUEST IS NOT AT AN INTERSECTION. REQUESTED LOCATION IS: Broadbill Drive, in the cul-de-sac, South Creek POLICY CRITERIA: Intersection: Vehicles per Day: Petition: Not Qualified, location not an intersection Not Qualified, less than 400 VPD Qualified Staff or Requestor Comments: No requestor comments. Staff notes that this project was originally presented to the Board on November 24, 1998. It was deferred at the August 25, 1999, October 27, 1999, and May 24, 2000, meetings. Representatives from the subdivision homeowners association have identified this location as their number 2 priority. Staff notes that the cost for this installation has increased by $1,321.31 since the May 24, 2000, Board of Supervisors meeting. This location is not a school bus stop. Street Light Request Map ~UTHC~£E~ DR Street Light Legend ~ existing light ~ requested light This map shows citizen requested streetlight installations in relation to existing streetlights. E~ting streetlight information was obtained from the Chesterfield County Environmental Engineering Department. CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page I of I Meetin~l Date: January 10, 2001 Item Number: 8.no SubieCt:Nominations/Appointment/Reappointment of County Representative to the Solid Waste Advisory Committee (SWAC) County Administrator's Comments: Coun~ Administrator: ~ Board Action Requested: Request the board appoint? a representative from the Midlothian District to the Solid Waste Advisory Committee Summary oflnformation: Mr. Paul R. Swenson, Midlothian Magisterial District, has expressed his desire and willingness to fill the current vacancy on the Solid Waste Advisory Committee. Mr. Swenson is a long time resident of the Midlothian district and has been active within the community. In his current capacity as Vice-President with Shoosmith Bros. Inc., he brings a solid waste industry perspective that is beneficial to this committee. Mr. Barber has recommended that the Board nominate/appoint Mr. Swenson to the Solid Waste Advisory Committee. Member Term Expires Mr. Paul R. Swenson December 31, 2003 Under the existing Rules of Procedure, appointments to boards and co~mnittees are nominated at one meeting and appointed at the subsequent meeting unless the rules of procedure are suspended by a unanimous vote of the Board Members present. Nominees are voted on in the order in which they are nominated ~ Fr~cis M. Pitaro ~' Title:Director of General Services Attachments: [~Yes No CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 2 Meeting Date: January 10, 2001 Item Number: 8oBo Subject: Streetlight Installation Approval County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: This item requests Board approval of a New Streetlight Installation in the Bermuda District. Summary of Information' Streetlight requests from individual citizens or civic groups are received in the Department of Environmental Engineering. Staff requests cost quotations from Virginia Power for each request received. When the quotations are received, staff re-examines each request and presents them at the next available regular meeting of the Board of Supervisors for consideration. Staff provides the Board with an evaluation of each request based on the following criteria: 1. Streetlights should be located at intersections; There should be a minimum average of 600 vehicles per day (VPD) passing the requested location if it is an intersection, or 400 VPD if the requested location is not an intersection; o Petitions are required and should include 75% of residents within 200 feet of the requested location and if at an intersection, a majority of those residents immediately adjacent to the intersection. CONTINUED NEXT PAGE Preparer: Title:Director, Environmental Richard M. McElfish EnGineering Attachments' Yes ~ No CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 2 of 2 Summary of Information' (Continued) Cost quotations from Virginia Power are valid for a period of 60 days. The Board, upon presentation of the cost quotation may approve, defer, or deny the expenditure of funds from available District Improvement Funds for the streetlight installation. If the expenditure is approved, staff authorizes Virginia Power to install the streetlight. A denial will cancel the project and staff will so notify the requestor. A deferral will be brought before the Board again when specified. BERMUDA DISTRICT: In the Walthall Mill Subdivision Quarterpath Lane and Walthall Drive Cost to install streetlight: $2,615.40 Meets minimum criteria For information regarding available balances in the District Improvement Fund accounts, please reference the District Improvement Fund Report. STREETLIGHT REQUEST Bermuda District Request Received: January 12, 2000 Estimate Received: December 28, 2000 NAME OF REQUESTOR: ADDRESS: Estimate Requested: January 13, 2000 Days Estimate Outstanding: 350 Cost to install light: $ 2,615.40 Mr. Kenneth Coleman 620 Quarterpath Lane Colonial Heights, VA 23834 REQUESTED LOCATION: Quarterpath Lane and Walthall Drive POLICY CRITERIA: Intersection: Vehicles per Day: Petition: Qualified Qualified Qualified Staff or Requestor Comments: Requestor states: "The residents believe that these lights will provide a measure of safety for people walking in the neighborhood in the evening and assist emergency vehicles in locating streets." Staff notes that this location is a school bus stop. Street Light Request Map anua 10, 2001 CROSSING OUARIE~AIH ~ ~ c~ ots ol~ Street Light Legend existing light requested light I ° = 721.~ f~et This map shows citizen requested streetlight installations in relation to ~cisting streetlights. Existing streetlight information was obtained from the Chesterfield County Environmental Engineering Department. CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page I of ~ Meeting Date: January 10, 2001 Item Number: 8.C.1. a. Subject: Set a Public Hearing to Consider Amendments to the Subdivision, Zoning and Utility Ordinances County_ Administrator's Comments: County_ Administrator: Board Action Requested: Staff recommends the Board of Supervisors set a public hearing for the first Board of Supervisors meeting in February 2001, to consider amendments to the Subdivision, Zoning and Utility Ordinances Summary of information; In 1998, a process began to review and revise the Subdivision Ordinance. The current Subdivision Ordinance was adopted in 1988 and requires revisions to conform to current state codes, court decisions and to concur with current practices. The Subdivision Team consisting of representatives from each of the County development departments and VDOT, partnered with representatives of theHome Builders Association of Richmond to revise the ordinance. Changes are also proposed to the Zoning Ordinance relating to the subdivision process. On November 16, 2000, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on the amendments to the Subdivision and Zoning Ordinances. On December 19, 2000 the Planning Commission recommended that the Board approved the attached ordinance amendments. The major improvements to the subdivision process that will be enacted Preparer: AttaChments: Yes ~-] No Title: Director of Planning C:DATA/AGENDA/2001/JAN 1001.1/GOK CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 2 of 2 Meeting Date: January 10, 2001 Item Number: Summary of Information: (Continued) with this amendment are: new process for minor subdivisions up to five (5) lots; new process to review agricultural property divisions prior to recordation to minimize creation of illegal lots; modification of subdivision access standards to balance the desire to minimize traffic on residential streets and provide adequate access for police, fire and rescue personnel. Should the Board approve the amendments to the Zoning and Subdivision Ordinances per the Planning Commission,s recommendation, Section 18-64 of the Utility Ordinance also needs to be amended to ensure consistency between the various sections of the County Code. A copy of the proposed amendments is attached. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY SUBDIVISION, UTILITY AND ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENTS These amendments to the Subdivision, Utilities and Zoning Ordinance incorporate the following major actions: · Minor Subdivisions. A new process has been developed to make it easier to subdivide up to five (5) lots when no new streets will be developed. This process will be quicker and less costly than the current process. · Parcel Subdivisions ( Road stripped parcels ) This new process will provide a review of the division of agricultural parcels to determine that the proposal meets the minimum standards to be exempt from the formal subdivision process. This process is designed to assure that these divisions are legal and that Planning can recommend approval of building permits once the parcels are recorded. The Clerk of the Circuit Court was a key partner in this change. · Subdivision access standards Existing subdivision access standards are being changed to better assure that the amount of traffic on residential streets is minimized and that safe access can be maintained for police, fire and rescue personnel. The current standard allows only fifty (50) homes to be constructed on a single access. Numerous exceptions have been granted to this standard over the years. The new standard will allow up to 100 homes on collector streets and attempts to minimize exceptions to assure safe access. Match ordinance to State Code and case law. The existing ordinance does not comply with recent changes in the State Code including changes which effect the Health Department's review of lots that have septic systems. There have also been several court cases which have required changes to the current ordinance. Improve the organization and clarity of the ordinance Numerous changes were made to describe the subdivision process more clearly, def'me terms and incorporate current development policies. Parcel'Line Modifications. The current ordinance makes it difficult for owners of older parcels of land to make minor changes to the size and shape of their property. A more streamlined process has been developed to address this need. ATTACHMENT 1 AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE CODE OF THE COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD, 1997 AS AMENDED BY AMENDING, AND RE-ENACTING SECTIONS 17- 1 THRU 91 RELATING TO SUBDIVISION OF LAND BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County: (1) That Sections 17-1 et seq. of the Code of the Count. of Chesterfield. 1997, as amended, is amended and re-enacted to read as follows: Subdivision Ordinance ARTICLE I. IN GENERAL Sec. 17-1. Purpose of chapter. Sec. 17-2. Definitions. Sec. 17-3. Interpretation of chapter. Sec. 17-4. Administration of chapter. Sec. 17-5. Transfer or sale without approved plat prohibited. Sec. 17-6. Building permits restrictions Sec. 17-7. Tentative and final approved plats to comply with chapter. Sec. 17-8. Alternatives to chapter provisions---General. Sec. 17-9. °--- o,~,~--, ,,~,..,,,,~ ,~ ~uv,~,.~,[,. Conditions. Sec. 17-10. "--- oo~,~--,~u,,~,,u~,,. Planned developments Sec. 17-11, Fees. Sec. 17-12. Legal remedies for violations. Sec. 17-13. Penalties. Secs. 17-14--17-30. Reserved. ARTICLE II. PLATS AND PLATTINCr*- DIVISION 1. GENERALLY Se 17 31 Subdi isi '"~-'-'--' ....." ':-- by -'-' ....... ~'-'---~' ....1 yo Sec. 17 32" .... "-- -' ..... : ...... ~ ...... "~-' --"~:-':-:'- fo bdivision - · ¥ ~;I, bO~l.lUll, ~J,I[~.~IIXtlUII, ~,~l.b,~ Ul I.~,~bUI~I~,U 3tILlUI¥1~IUII,Procedure r Su approval, Sec. 17-33. Restttxii~i~ion. Procedure for appeals, Sec. 17-34.,,~,~ ~ ...... · ~,,~ ac. as v~u,.o~,~,~. Vacation. alteration, etc, , of recorded subdivision Sec. 17-35· *' . ,u,~,~,,,,,,~ ,u, ~,,o,~¥,,,u,, approval. Amended and resubdivision plats. Sec. 17-36. Recordation of plat prior to compliance with zoning ordinance prohibited. DIVISION Sec. Sec. Sec. Sec. 2. PREPARATION AND CONTENTS OF TENTATIVE PLATS 17-37. Generally. 17-38. Required information. 17-39. Plat skctch rcquircd. Plat reduction required. 17-40.~mtfi've~. Overall conceptual subdivision plan. DIVISION 3. PREPARATION AND CONTENTS OF FINAL CHECK AND RECORD PLATS* Sec. 17-41 '~:--' -' .......... : - - -" ..... :-- -~' ......... ~ ' · ~'i,iai },iaL .,aJ wu,~,tutu a~x ut put,uti ut apt,.uvvu tentativeat. General. Sec. 17-42. '--'-'--':-- ~' ..........' ,~vv-,.--,,- ,,,, -t4,,,,*,-. Subdivision Review, Sec. 17-43. Flint-phi. Required information. DIVISION 4. PREPARATION AND CONTENTS OF FINAL CHECK AND RECORD pLATS FOR RESIDENTIAL PARCEL SUBDIVISIONS AND PARCEL PROPERTY I JNE MODIFICATIONS Sec. 1744. General. Sec. 17-45. Procedure for residential parcel subdivision and property, line modification approval, Sec. 17-46. Residential parcel subdivision and parcel line modification plat requirements Secs. 17-47--17-60. Reserved, ARTICLE III. DESIGN STANDARDS DIVISION 1. GENEP,,ALLY MINIMUM STANDARDS AND REQUIRED IMPROVEMENTS Sec. 17-61· Conformity to applicable rules and regulations. 17-62. Standard conditions. Sec. Sec. 17-63. Sec. 17-64. Sec. 17-65. Sec. 17-66. Sec. 17-67. Sec. 17-68. Sec. 17-69. Sec. 17-70. Setbacks. Sec. Sec. Sec. Sec. Lniprovcmcnts --Rcquircd. Floodplains, Preservation of natural features and ame~ties. .................' ' Prop ~ kers / Geodetic Monments corncrs.~ ..... ":~ Easements --~,~-~-,~ ~-~ v~. Street n~es and street signs. 17-71 · ~o,~ use. Designation of land for public use~ 17-72. ~'~-~ · ',~ ~--~ ~,~,~--~. Improvements - Required, 17-73.~ Imallation of improvements aM bonding, 17-74. o,~.~,.~..,,~ Maintemnce requirements and homing. I I - I ~, UIIg~I[IU~II~III[ ULIII[IU3. I I - I U, U L/IIL~ casements. I%77. o DIVISION 2. ~, ,-~'~,'.- o ~,',~, ~, ~,.,..- o* STREET STANDARDS Sec. 17-75 78.-6enerat~. General, Sec. Sec. Sec. Sec. Sec. Sec. o,,. ~,,t,,_,,u~ ,,u .-r,.t~,,7~. Access to arterial or collector streets 17 78 o, , ............ ,_, .... 11 ..... Street rieht 0f-way width - o~. o.,~,~, ttt~-,-,,t-,~.j ,~t,~,.. Cul-de-sac streets. 17 80 °" '"" ~ ..... ~'---' ---' ....... int ti - oJ. ',.-ut-u~,-aa~.,a O[ uuau-uitu a;t~a.,ca. Street ersec ons, 17-81 o, .._,~, o... ~..tt-~.,~,~.~. Alleys, 2 C 38 Sec. 17-82 o~ ,, ......· · o~,. o[~[ h-itcrs¢ctior~. Sidewalks. DIVISION 4. LOTS 3 LOT AND PARCEL STANDARDS Sec. 17-83-90w. Minimum requirements. Sec. 17-84 "' Size of lots served by ........ -'--~' ' ~,u,w.uu,a~ septic on-site disposal-systems-. Secs. 17-85-91. Reserved. Chapter 17 SUBDIVISION OF LAND ARTICLE I. IN GENERAL Sec. 17-1. Purpose of chapter. This chapter is adopted for the following purposes: (a-l-) To promote the public health, safety, convenience and general welfare. (b-2) To further the orderly layout and use of land. (c5) To avoid undue concentration of population and overcrowding of land. (d_4) To lessen congestion in the streets and highways. (~-5) To provide for adequate light and air and for idemifying soil characteristics. (f-6) To facilitate adequate provisions for transportation, water, wastewater sewage, storm drainage, schools, parks, piaygrotmd~, and other public requirements. (g~) To provide for adequate access and mitigating street improvements proper ingrc$~ and egress. (h-8) To ensure proper legal description and proper monumenting of subdivided land. (_i-9) To promote seem, e safety from fire, flood, panic, and other dangers. Q_t-0) To facilitate the further resubdivision of tracts or parcels of land. (k) To promote the preservation and integration of environmental resources into subdivision layouts. (1) To minimize the irnpact of development on environmental resources. These regulations are established with reasonable consideration of the character of the county with a view toward conserving the value of buildings upon the land and providing the best possible environment for human habitation. It is intended that these regulations shall supplement and facilitate the enforcement of the provisions and development standards contained in the Uniform Statewide Building Code, chapters 18 and 19 of this Code, thc ...:,:.:A_,,t,,,~,,~,~,~t-,-,-' ........... ~,,,,~,,~ watcr ~' ~,,~, ,,,,~.~,.,~,~ aii,~ the comprehensive general plan.~ and other applicable laws and regulations. A copy of this chapter shall be maintained on file in the office of the director of planning. (Cd '"'° §,o~ ~, 0 ~ i:7/o, lo.x-x! State law reference(s). Code of Virginia. §§ 15.2.2240-2241. Sec. 17-2. Definitions. ,, ,~t t,,,~,..,~,,,,~ ~,~ ,-~ ,~--v-t~, Tthe definitions contained in this section shall be observed and applied, except when the context clearly indicates otherwise: Access; The right to cross between public and private property allowing pedestrians and vehicles to enter and exit property.. Adjacent: Property having a common boundary other than across a street or alley. lilt tUtlilLJ [lllt~tUl UI [Jl~lllll/il~ UI 1113 tlt31~ll~t 113 tilt IJiU¥I3IUII~ UI till3 tli~[JLtl I~tltlllt, Best Management Practice (BMP): As defined by chapter 19. Block: As defined bv chanter 19. ' tract Buff_er: A designated area of existing or proposed vegetation, berms, fences or walls intended to address at least one of the following: 1. provide open space between streets, properties and certain uses, 2. preserve existing vegetation or provide for vegetation. 3. provide transition and separation, 4. reduce noise and glare, 5. maintain privacy, and 6. restrict vehicular access, A buffer may also be a designated area of vegetation intended to provide open space between areas zoned for or used for residential or residential townhouse uses and sensitive environmental or topographic features or historic features to preserve existing vegetation, provide transition and separation, maintain privacy, and control access. Buildablefootprint: The area of the building envelope which is in compliance with the buildinff site standards as specified in this code by having sufficient area to contain the planned structures, but in no case shall any of the four sides of the buildable footprint for single family detached units have a minimum perpendicular interior dimension less than twenty-five (25) feet or as required to meet conditions of zoning. Buildable footprints depicted on plats shall demonstrate the ability_ 5 of the subdivider to comply with all standards and on lots or parcels with on-site disposal SYStems that the buildable foo~rint location does not encroach upon the approved disposal site. Buildable lot: A lot that is recorded in accordance with provisions of the Code as well as state law and that has at least one building envelope. Buildable parcel; A parcel that is recorded in accordance with provisions of the Code as well as state law and that has at least one building envelope. Building: As defined bv chavter 19. A ............ ,_..:,~ ~,__ .,_ ...... , ...... Building envelope: The area of the lot or parcel which is in compliance with the building site standards as specified in this code. All building envelopes shall have sufficient area to contain the planned structures, but in no case shall any of the four sides of the building envelope for single family detached units have a minimum perpendicular interior dimension less than twenty-five (25) feet or as required to meet conditions of zoning, Building envelopes shall not include easements unless otherwise approved by the applicable authority, Building setback line: A line or-lines within a lot or parcel,,-" ,,,,~'---' so designated on a recorded plat or as otherwise established by law the Code, and that defines the building envelope. Building setback line. pont: As defined by chapter 19. Chesapeake Bay. Preservation Act ( CBpA ): The Chesapeake Bay Preservation Act, Virginia Code ~__~ 2100 et seq. Code: The Chesterfield County Code of Ordinances as adopted and amended. Common open space: An area or areas within a development designed and developed for the use or enjoyment of all residents of the development and whose title is or will be held by a homeowners association, Common open space is not a buildable lot. Commonwealth: The Commonwealth of Virginia. Comprehensive Ccncralplan: T-he-ptarrAn overall guide to manage Chesterfield County's physical growth adopted pursuant to detinea~xt°oY the Code of Virginia, §§ 15.1466.1. !5.2-2223 et seq. Construction plans: A set of drawings and related specifications for the construction of facilities within or serving a subdivision including, but not limited to. streets, water and wastewater systems, stormwater improvements. Count_: Chesterfield County. Virginia, 6 Cul-de-sac: A street with only one outlet to another street and having an appropriate terminus terminai for the safe and convenient reversal of traffic movement. A "~"~ ,,, · ,~, .,,~ Director of/Chief of'. As defined by chapter 19. Easement: As defined by chapter 19. A ~.,,. ,,~ a p,,~p~,L~ ,~,,~ ,,~ ,L~ ,~ ,,, ~,,, ,,,, p,,o,,. Engineer: An engineer licensed by the Commonwealth. Flag lot: A lot which has a narrow appendage providing the required street frontage and through which access is provided to an enlarged portion of the lot typically located behind another lot that abuts the street, Flag lots shall only be utilized to protect or limit impacts to environmental or historic resources. Frontage: As defined by chapter 19. Geographic information system ( GIS ): Geographic information system owned and operated by the county. Highway engineer: The Virginia Depamnent of Transportation resident engineer or their designee serving the County. ll,.,il)~/t,~t~L L%J WIII%~il %JWiil.,13 ~Yl k/~,~.,LI~JO. IIL~ ~Jl O~IJLLLLIII~ [Jl~.Yp~..,l.L.y I.J* llJ, llkJ-i3 O.11%1 ~,Jklil,~{. [J~,I~UII3 110.¥%., llU U~., U~,L~.,IIIIIIIL. U U.y LIIk., [.Jtlt/ll%., O~M. LIIUIILJ II~I. VIII[ JLI-IIDUIk.,LIUII U¥1,.,I ~tlk.,ll [IOillk.,Way. Lot: As defined by. chapter 19, Api¢cc or parccl ,~-~' ,,-,,,.,. ....... .,.,,,,:"-"- a o,.,.o..,.,o,.~,.,. $c~~,,,. bj rnctcs and Lot As definedb hte 19 A · corner: v c aD r , 7 Lot depth; As defined by chapter 19. Lot, interior: As defined by chapter_ 19. A'tuL .... uL.~t'--- "---..,,. a ~.~, ~. Lot. recorded: As defined by chapter 19. Lot, through: As defined by cha~ter 19. A' ..... Lot, width of: As defined bv chaoter 19. ""-- ~---: ..... ,..1~' ...... t. ......... 1.~ ~'-.3~ 11--~-~;f a 1~. . - I IIU ll~llfiUll[~l ~13~11~ U~gW~II HIU 31~U 1111~3 ___ lug Natural riparian corridor: Naturally vegetated buffer areas adjacent and contiguous tO streams which may include non-isolated wetlands and other water bodies. No Building Permit ( NBP): Lot requires inspection prior to issuance of building permit which serves as the Land Disturbance Permit for single family residential construction, On-site disposal system: A sewage disposal system or any other sewage treatment device not connected to the County's public wastewater system approved by the county health department as being in accordance with the rules and regulations of the state department of health and applicable provisions of this Code. Overall conceptual subdivision plan: A preliminary plan depicting the general layout of street rights of way. lots. major utility, lines and drainage facilities as specified in sec. 17-40. Owner: Any person, group of persons, firmf_s~ or-firms, corporation.(~l m---em'pomtiom, or any other legal entity having legal title to the land sought to be subdivided under this chapter. Parcel: Land not part of a lot-subdivision. Planned deve ment: As defined by. chapter_ 19. ~"-**t~ .... o..o,~,o~.,,,~--'---'-- ut-~' ,,,.~--- or niorc .,,L= ~.,~, ~,,t~t~- ~,~11~,~i3 UI UIJ~,,IO. LI~/IB I:l~,~t.~,./IU. lll[ I.U gl. Il gll. JIJlU¥1.~J. lllO. i~l.~.~l lJll:lll WlII~II lllaaV lll~,.~llJ.~.l&~ iiiU. iLii. JiU lglll~L I. ID[,,D, Planning Commission: As defined by chapter 19. 8 p ~, u-ro-os¢~' ---'- -' :--:-: -- '- .... -' .... Plat, amended: A recorded alteration A-resttt:division of a recorded plat mbdivision, or portion thereof, which does not involve a change in property lines. ~ Amendmenks may include, but are not limited to, name changes and corrections relating to metes and bounds descriptions, coordinate points, correction-of floodplain limits lines, wetland limits, RPA lines, setback lines, drainage easements, buffers, misnumbered lots and text,.~--: .... o},,..,.,,'--' words. Plat, final check: The plat plan of a proposed subdivision of land which meets all the requirements of this chapter and chapter 19 of this Code., including any accompanying material, as described in division 3 of article II of this chapter, submitted for review and comment purposes prior to the proposed record plat submission. Plat, record: The plat plan of a subdivision of land which meets all the requirements of this _~ .t:_ ~._ 4_ including any accompanying material chapter and chapter 19 as well as state laws u~ as described in division 3 of article II of this chapter, that has been recorded by the clerk of the circuit court of the county_. Plat, resubdivision: :am-atmhoeieed A recorded change in a recorded plat sttbdivision which invol line alterations __... .... , .... t_A --Al .... ~' ...... 1 ..... .'~-- A~ ........ 11 .... .......... ~ ...... "-' ............ ' .....": ...... Resubdivisions may include, but are not limited to. combining lots. dividing a lot between adjacent lots and alterations of lot lines. Plat, tentative: A plan map showing the reauired_ information for ,,.,..,~-':A-' ,,,,.,,,,,.~ ........ ,.,," a proposed subdivision, in accordance with section 17-38. reviewed and ar)proved by mbmitted-to the director of planning or planning commission for purposes of determining conceptual conformity, with article II division 2 Plat. tentative a4iusted: A plat showing a change(s) to an approved tentative plat. An adjusted tentative is used when change(s) effect more than ten (10) percent of the lots or alters the street layout or which requires changes to approved conditions to achieve conformance with construction plans. Adjusted tentative plats are reviewed and approved by the director of planning in accordance with section 17-32 (al (1)(A) or if the adjusted plat is for a tentative approved by the planning commission, it shall be reviewed and approved by the planning commission in accordance with section 17-32 (a) (1)(B). Plat. tentative substitute: A plat intended to replace an approved tentative plat in accordance with the requirements of section 17-4. showing minor changes including but not limited tO; subdivision or street name change(s), an alteration of not more than ten (10) percent of the lots and that does not alter the street layout nor change conditions to achieve conformance with construction plans. Property: Any piece, tract, lot, parcel of land or several of the same collected together for the purpose of subdividing. Right-of-way: the property., or interest therein, dedicated for use as a public street which is in or is designated to become part of the Virginia state transportation system. A piece ,,, ~L,~, ,,, ,~,,, Roadway: That portion of a street used primarily for paved for use by vehicular traffic. Resource Management Area ( RMA ): Resource management area as defined and regulated by chapter 19. Resource Protection Area ( RPA ): Resource protection area as defined and re~lated by chapter 19, Setbacks: A series of lines established on a lot or parcel based upon the minimum applicable yard requirements set forth in chapter 19. this chapter or otherwise set forth in the Code beyond which no structure may be constructed. Stormwater Management (SWM): Measures taken to mitigate the impact of stormwater on the hydrologic cycle resulting from changes to the landscape which occur when land is developed. Stormwater Management / Best Management Practice (SWM/BMP): A facility or system whose purpose is to impact storm water management from both a water quantity and water quality standpoint. ~street,_~Arterial: As defined bv chamer 19, 10 413 ~stre ll As defined b h 19 et,_co ector: v c doter A ...... ,,x ayocwi.i .,x ott~to~ ilia[ uxo.,ou[wo .axxx,. Street. eyebrow loop: A portion of a local street that has an enlarged right of way area upon which lots front, incom_ orating an area of pavement that is separated from the travel lanes by a small landscaped island or an extended pavement width. Eyebrow loop streets are not permitted on residential collectors, collectors, or arterial streets. The maximum depth of an eyebrow loop street shall be less than two (2) times the required right of way width as measured from the adjacent right of way line of the through street to the inside right of way line of the eyebrow or similar location if the eyebrow is totally contained within right of way. Street, limited access: As defined by chapter 19. Street. loop: A local street that has two (2) points of intersection onto a street, The minimum depth of a loop street shall be not less than three (3) times the required right of way width as measured from the adjacent right of way line of the through street to the inside right of way line of the loop or similar location if the loop is totally contained within right of way. Street. residential collector: A street which is projected to carry average daily traffic volumes above the acceptable level established by the planning commission Stub Road Policy and typically does not permit access to individual lots except as provided for by section 17-77. Stre ~Stub-rmd __ 1--. 1.~-- '~ .... 1 ................ on a subdivision plat to,~,.,,.,-'---' ,..,~---' ~,,--- terminate at adjacent property to provide access for future development. Structure: As defined by chapter 19. Subdivider: Any owner, proprietor or contract purchaser of a lot or tract of land person as '- ...... :-- ~ "-"'1-:- their duly pla o~ ~,.,..,~., ~-.. ,,, .,,~ Code or authorized representative of-an-ewner includine nners, architects, landscape architects, surveyors, engineers and others having training and experience in subdivision planning or design, who undertakes the subdivision of land as defined herein. OUUtlI¥1~IUII. lll~ tll¥1~lUll UI O. il,~ }J~ll~,l.,i UI IClIlti IUI I~,31tI[,IILIIll tl~k,j lll{,t} {-WU Ui i-l-iO[C, IUL3 iii~' oi~e 11 Subdivision. Lot: The division of any parcel of land for residential or residential townhouse use, into two or more lots. any one of which is less than five (5) acres, or which has street frontage on which access is located of less than three hundred (300) feet or two hundred and fifty. (250) feet if a legally established access shared by no more than two lots is used, for the purpose, either immediate or future, of transfer of ownership or development for residential or residential townhouse use. Lot subdivisions shall exclude: (a) Family subdivisions as defined in residential parcel subdivision. (b) Granting or extinguishing easements, and division of land for augmented estates, subordination or lien priority, plats of confirmation and open space not directed at the creation of lots or parcels for sale, and not done for the purpose of circumventin~ this chapter, (c) Division of any parcel of land for residential use. into two or more parcels which are each more than five (5) acres. (d) Division of land with commercial or industrial zoning as defined by chapter 19 of this code for the purpose of office, business, or industrial development. Subdivision. Conventional: A subdivision for single family dwellings or two family dwellings as defined in chapter 19. including but not limited to: dwellings with standard lot setbacks, dwellings with specified bulk rea_uirements, zero lot line dwellings, z-lot dwellings, and cluster dwellings, Subdivision, Minor: A lot subdivision which is exempted from the tentative plat approval 12 requirement and conforms to all of the following: (a) Not more than five (5) lots fronting on an existing local street: (b) Does not create any new streets: (c) Does not require the extension of wastewater or water lines: (d) Does not require the installation of stormwater improvements as determined by the director of environmental engineering: (e) Is in compliance with provisions of the Chesapeake Bay Protection Act by having an average lot size of one acre. is opted out. and is outside the Swift Creek Reservoir drainage area: (fl Conforms to the provisions of this chapter: (g) Provides for right of way as shown in the thoroughfare plan and bulk requirements of the zoning ordinance. Subdivision. Residential Parcel: The division, per article II division IV, of any parcel of land for residential use. into two (2) or more parcels all of which are more than five (5) acres, and which; 1. have frontage of not less than three hundred (300) feet or two hundred and fifty. (250) feet if a legally established access shared by no more than two parcels is used on an existing street, and: 2. access to the parcel is provided within the area of required frontage, and: 3. the required minimum parcel width, per 1. above, is maintained for a depth required to create a five (5) acre parcel or in an arrangement approved by the director of planning after determining that the configuration is appropriate based upon limitations imposed by the parcel shape and environmental features on the parcel and is not for the purpose of circumventing this subsection. (a) Residential parcel subdivisions shall include; Family subdivisions which shall be defined as a single division of land to create a lot or a parcel for the purpose of a sale or gift tO a member of the immediate family of the property owner including a partition of property_ owned by immediate family members. Only one such division shall be allowed per family member and shall not be for the purpose of circumventing this chapter. For the purpose of this subsection, a member of the immediate family shall be defined as any person who is a natural or legally defined offspring, spouse, sibling, grandchild, grandparent or parent of the owner. Family subdivision shall comply with all applicable requirements of the zoning ordinance and the standards set forth in this chapter. Access shall be provided as required by the Code of Virginia, (b) Residential parcel subdivisions shall exclude: Granting or extinguishing easements, and division of land for augmented estates, subordination or lien priority., plats of confirmation and open space, not directed at the creation of lots or parcels for sale. and not done for the purpose of circumventing this chapter. 13 C 49 Subdivision. parcel prqt)erty line modification: An existing legally created parcel that may or may not meet the current area or dimensional requirements of this chapter and chapter 19 may be altered to increase the parcel area subject to the requirements of section 17-44 Subdivision. recorded: A subdivision that has been approved by the county_ in accordance with this chapter and has been duly recorded by the clerk of the court of Chesterfield County.. Subdivision. Townhouse: A subdivision for townhouses as defined in chapter 19. Subdivision. unrecorded: A proposed tentative or final check plat that has been officially submitted for approval by the county, in accordance with this chapter and has not been recorded by the clerk of the court of Chesterfield County. Subdivision dmi$m standards: The basic land-planning standards established in this chapter and chapter 19 as guides for the preparation of~ plats. Surveyor: A certified land surveyor authorized under the laws of the C¢ommonwealth. Tract: See Parcel. Vicinity sketch: A location map of the subdivision with the existing streets and street names which provide access shown to a scale of one inch equals 2,000 feet. Water supply, individual well: A well supplying a source of water to one lot. Water supply, public system: A water supply and distribution system owned and operated by the county. Wastewater. public system: A wastewater system owned and operated by the county. Wetlands: As defined by chapter 19. Cross reference(s)--Definitions and rules of construction generally, § 1-2. State law reference(s). Code of Virginia. §_~ 15.2-2240. Sec. 17-3. Interpretation of chapter. (a) The provisions of this chapter are ~,la,, ~ ,l~,,, .u ~,~ the minimum requirements for the promotion of the public health, safety, convenience and general welfare. 14 (b) Where the conditions imposed by an)' provisions of this chapter ...... = .... '--':-':-:-- -" '---' diffe th -"= ..........' :-': ..... ' ....... ' :-': .... ~--- abl diti imposed by any other provisions of this chapter or of any other applicable ia~;-ordvame~. t,~,~..L.,,.,'-': ..... t~.t,~.'- ,~t-- regulation of any kind, the regulations which are more restrictive and impose higher standards or requirements shall govern. (c) This chapter is not intended to invalidate abrogate any easement, covenant, or other private agreement; provided, that where the regulations of this chapter are more restrictive or impose higher standards or regulations than such easement, covenant, or other private agreement, the requirements of this chapter shall govern. Sate law reference(s). Code of Virginia. 15.2-2240. Sec. 17-4. Administration of chapter. (a) The agent director of planning is hereby delegated the authority to administer this chapter. (b) The agent director of planning shall perform all duties regarding subdivision and subdividing in accordance with this chapter and applicable state law. c ~. L.,. t,~-,,----~ ,,t .l~ ,~uL.~,, T__the director of arming agent may call on o ons or decisions, either verbal or written, from county officials in considering details of any submitted plat. of planning agent may, from time to time, establish any reasonable administrative procedures deemed necessary for the proper administration of this chapter. (e) The director of planning may accept a substitute tentative plat in lieu of the approved tentative plat. The director shall, as a part of the acceptance, determine that the substitute plat has no substantive impact on an appealable issue. The director shall advise the ~ubdivider if the plat is acceptable without providing additional notice or appeal rights. Cf-e) Notwithstanding the above, the directors of environmental engineering, transportation and utiliti~ shall.,~ = ..... ~,, ut~=-~...,~-' ...... ~,~ administer the improvements required by section~ 17- 72-74-630~. State law reference(s).--~,~.,..,[, 15 Sec. 17-5. Transfer or sale without approved plat prohibited. No person shall subdivide land without making and recording a plat of the subdivision and without fully complying with the provisions of this chapter of the Code. No plat of any subdivision shall be recorded unless and until it has been submitted to and approved by the planning commission or director of planning. No person shall sell or transfer any lot or parcel of an unrecorded subdivision, before a plat has been duly approved and recorded in the circuit court clerk's office. ( ) '~-: .... ':-- Code of Virginia, § ~,o.,--~,., = ' ~'"' 15,2-2254, State law reference s :--Basis of ~,~ ~,~,~.,,,~, Sec. 17-6. Building permits restrictions.,,,~--' to b~- ,~..,d' ..... (a) No building permit shall be issued for the construction of any building or structure on a lot or parcel if the lot or parcel is created or established in violation of the provisions of this chapter. (b) No building permit shall be issued on a proposed lot that has not been recorded. (c) No building permit shall be issued on a 10t or parcel which is not in compliance with Chapter 8 of the Code of Chesterfield County. (d) No building permit shall be issued on parcels recorded after (INSERT DATE ) that have not been reviewed and approved in accordance with article II division 4 of this chapter, (e) No building permit shall be issued on a lot or parcel until such time the countY has assigned all necessary coding and addressing. (f) Parcels and / or lots recorded prior to January 1, 1980 shall be considered buildable if they meet all standards relative to the appropriate zoning district. If frontage and width standards cannot be met. the parcel or lot is eligible to apply for a variance. (g) Parcels recorded between January_ 1. 1980 and August 24, 1988. shall be considered buildable if.. (1) The parent parcel was only split once into two (2) parcels, each meeting all zoning standards, or (2) The parent parcel was split for immediate family members. If all zonine standards cannot be met. the parcel or lot is eligible to apply for a variance, or 16 (3) The parent parcel was split several times into "exemption lots" whereby each lot has a minimum of thirty-thousand (30.000) square feet and a minimum of one hundred and twenty-five (125) feet of frontage, provided that seventy-five (75) feet from the center line of the street the parcel width measures a minimum of one hundred and fifty. (150) feet. The last parcel remaining may meet the minimum standards relative to that zoning district. Parcels recorded between August 25. 1988 and June 22. 1993. shall be considered buildable (1) The parent parcel was only split into parcels containing a minimum of five (5) acres and a minimum of two hundred (200) feet of frontage and a minimum of one hundred and fifty feet of width at the required minimum building setback or building location, or (2) The parent parcel was split for immediate family members. cannot be met. the parcel is eligible to apply for a variance. If all zonine standards (3) The utilities and health department confirm that the parcel complies with the utility. connection requirements or the increased bulk standards related to the usage of well and septic. (i) Parcels recorded between June 23. 1993 and June 30. 1999. shall be considered buildable if the utilities and health departments confirm that the parcel cornplies with the utility connection requirements or the increased bulk standards related to the usage of well and septic, and; (1) The parent parcel was only split into parcels containing a minimum of five (5) acres and a minimum of three hundred (300) feet of frontage or two hundred and fifty. (250) feet of frontage if there is a shared common access and a minimum of one hundred and fifty (150) feet of width at the required minimum building setback or building location, or (2) The parent parcel was split for immediate family members. If all zoning standards cannot be met. the parcel or lot is eligible to apply for a variance, (j) Parcels recorded between July 1. 1999 and ( INSERT DATE ), shall be considered buildable if the utilities and health departments c0nfn'm that the parcel complies with the utility, connection requirements or the increased bulk standards related to the usage of well and septic, and; (1) The parent parcel was only split into parcels containing a minimum of five (5) acres and a minimum of three hundred (300) feet of frontage or two hundred and fifty. (250) feet of frontage if an access shared by no more than two lots or parcels is used, for a depth of one thousand (1000) feet or that necessary to create a five (5) acre parcel. Access to the lots or parcels shall be from the location of the frontage, or (2) The parent parcel was split for immediate family members. If all zoning standards cannot be met. the parcel or lot is eligible to apply for a variance. 17 State law reference(s). Uniform Statewide Building Code.(USBC) ~ 108.1. Sec. 17-7. Tentative~ and final check and record ~ plats to comply with chapter. No plat of a subdivision shall be approved which does not comply with all of the provisions of this chapter. State law reference(s). Code of Virginia. $$ 15.2-2254. Sec. 17-8. Alternatives to chapter provisions~merafly. Unless mandated by state code. ~Nhea the director of planning or planning commission fmds-th~ · ~...u., ~.,~L ~u-*t~,*--~ ~-. --~ ,~..~,ter, he may approve alternatives to the _eeneral teetmieat provisions of this chapter in cases of unusual situations or where strict adherence to these general re_inflations would result in substantial injustice or hardship, The director of planning may refer any request to the planning commission, imso-far-as _Ssuch alternatives shall substantially comply with the provisions of this chapter so that subsmmiat justice may be done and the public interest secured_.,-~q~aS-ed~ma Ssuch alternatives shall not have the effect of nullifying the intent and purpose of this chapter; and =--'1-.~ .,~. .......~., ~,~,:-'--' "--'~.[ the alternative,~.~,.L,~: ....... ,~' planrdng shall be appro ed ~' ..... : ....... 1- ...... -'-~ .... ~' '1--'- ~- ...... unlessnhe -1--" "t,,,- ~*~ ~,,,,~,,~ ~,,~*~,~L~u by the subdivider presents evidence that: in (a_{) The granting of the alternative will not be detrimental to the public safety, health or welfare, or injurious to other property or improvements in the neighborhood in which the property is located~; (12-2) The conditions upon which the request for an alternative is based are unique to the property for which the alternative is sought, and are not applicable, generally, to other property,; (cS) Because of the particular physical surroundings, shape or topographical conditions of the specific property involved, a particular hardship to the owner would result, as distinguished from a mere inconvenience, if the strict letter of the provisions of this chapter were carried out-and (d--4) The purpose of the alternative is not based exclusively upon a financial consideration. State law reference(s), Code of Virginia. ~ 15.2-2242, 18 Sec. 17-9. Conditions. In approving alternatives, the director of planning or planning commission may impose such conditions specifically related to the impact of the proposed subdivision as may be deemed necessary to secure substantially the objectives of the standards and requirements of This Code. State law reference(s). Code of Virginia. ~ 15.2-2242. Sec. 17-10. Planned developments. The standards and requirements of this chaPter may be modified in the case of planned developments when the planning commission or director of planning finds the developments provide adequate public spaces, improvements for the circulation of traffic, recreation, light, air, stormwater management, and public utilities service needs for the fully developed tract, and also provide such covenants or other legal provisions as will assure conformity and achievement of the cornprehensive plan. State law reference(s). Code of Virginia, § 15.2-2242, Sec. 17-11. Fees. The fees for processing subdivisions by the county shall be payable upon submission of the plats to the county for tentative or final approval and shall be equal to the following: Tentative subdivision approval, or resubmittal of an expired previously approved tentative: (la) Original submittal, including up to two resubmittals... $300.00 Plus, per lot... $20.00 (2_b) Renewal of previously approved tentative, including up to two resubmittals in accordance 19 with provisions of Section 17-32... $300.00 Plus, per lot... $20.00 (3e) Third and subsequent submittal for (D and (2) -~ --:-:--' u~ .... Ul Uli~lil~tl Ui i~l~VIUU~iJ L~.,,~,,~, per submittal... $ 200.00 (4_~) Substitute to approved tentative, per submittal c~... $50.00 1 (5 ¢) Adjusted tentative for previously approved tentative, including up ~o t~o ~csubmR~ls, ~300.00 Plus. pc~ lo~ ( beyond ~clvc monks oF ~pp~ovnl ), . , Thkd and subsco~cn[, pc~ submittal . . $200.00 (b) Final check. ~cndcd aud ~csubdivision pla~ ~cvic~; (i ~) F~I check plat subdivision ~nd minoc subdivision c~vic~ ~... ~d~0.00 ( O~y one base Fc~ ~ill bc ~qukcd Fo~ final ohcck pla~s ~cquimd to bc submi~cd in muRip{~ scctio.s duc to p~ovisions o~ ~c~tion 17,42. ) Plus, pc~ lot... (2) Final check msubdivision plat mvic~ ~. , , S~O0,00 Plus. pc~ lo~... ~.00 (3) Fiual check am~udcd pl~t c~vi~ ~.. , $300,00 Plus. pcc 1o~, ·, S~,00 (c) Residential pamcl subdivision .... $3~.00 pc~ (d) Parcel linc modification ~cvi~ ..... ~2~.00 pc~ (~ OnsRc sc~a~c disposal system ~oils analysis mvic~ .,.Si~ pc~ 2O State law reference s .--~,u~,~[j ,~ ,~,~,,~[j L,, t~,~w,~ ~,~, ~,.,~ ~,~ w-- r¢¥icw, Code o a, § ~ 15.2-2241. Sec. 17-12. Legal remedies for violations. (a) In addition to the penalties sr~ecified in section 17-13, - .... :~A~ ~__ .,__ _.:_,_.:A_ _~: ~.. ehapt~, the county administrator or director of planning agent may institute any appropriate action or proceedings by"U"--:"'"~L'"~I-'A-- or ,,-"-u,~. .... w,,~:--, to prevent such violation or attempted violation of this chapter and to restrain, correct or abate such violation or attempted violation, or to prevent any (b) The board may exempt a parcel from the Subdivision Ordinance as a condition of a CUPD when requested in writing by a bona fide purchaser of such parcel without notice that the parcel was created in violation of the provisions of this chapter where the following additional circumstances exist: 1. The parcel is zoned Agricultural (A); and 2. The parcel is located in an area that is designated for rural conservation on the Comprehensive Plan; and 3. A building permit was issued for the parcel at a time when the parcel was legally configured. State law reference(s), Code of Virginia, § 15.2-2241, -2254, -2255. Sec. 17-13. Penalties. Any person violating the provisions of this chapter shall be subject to a judicially imposed fine in the appropriate cour~ of not more than $500.00 for each lot or parcel of land so subdivided or transferred or sold; the description of such lot or parcel by metes and bounds in the instrument of transfer or other document used in the process of selling or transferring shall not exempt the transaction from such penalties or from the remedies herein provided. State law reference(s).--Basis,,~' "-:-[~.~ section. Code of Virginia, § 1J. I-~'~ I Secs. 17-14--17-30. Reserved. 21 ARTICLE II. PLATS AND PLATTING DIVISION 1. GENERALLY Sec. 17-31. SubdivisionPai-h,~-l,,,- ' .......... - -- '--- '- -" ...... ' · ....' ' ..... · ~- The director of planning or the planning commission, in the examination of subdivision plats for approval, -- ~ :- '~- .... ':--':-- -~ "-'- -'- ...... tequit~ts-of ,~,,~ -~ -,~ -w-,---,,- ,,~ ,,l~ ,..,~v~, shall take into consideration the the Comprehensive Plan, the community~_and the best layout use of the land being subdivided. Pattieu~ Aattention shall be given to items including but not limited to: rights of way width, and location of streets, suitable sanitary utilities, stormwater management ~..~.,~,.~ ~.,...~, lot sizes ,~,. arrangements, and_oublic facility as .... ,,,," as ,,~,~,, requirements such as parks mxt~ptaygrenmds, schools and recreation sites, and other facilities publ/e-uses. State law reference(s)~ Code of Virginia, § 15.2-2241. Sec. 17-32 Procedure for lot subdivision approval, (a) Following is a summary, of the approval procedure for sUbdivisions. (1) All proposed lot subdivisions, except minor and parcel subdivisions, must submit a tentative plat for approval in accordance with division 2 of this article. Tentotive plats are submitted to the director of planning. The subdivider may specify, whether the ~lat is to be reviewed administratively or by the planning commission. An overall conceptual subdivision plan shall be submitted if the subdivision will be developed in phases, contains mixed uses, or if such a plan is required by a condition of zoning. Changes to an approved tentative plat shall be submitted as an adjusted plat or a substitute plat. in accordance with section 17-4, (4) Approved tentative plats shall be valid for five (5) years from the date of approval, 22 O58 Adjusted and substitute tentative plats shall expire on the date of the initial tentative expiration, Once a tentative plat is approved, construction plans may be submitted for undeveloped subdivisions. The construction plans shall be submitted to the director of environmental engineering. Once construction plans are approved, a land disturbance permit may be i. ssued, Final check plats may be submitted for approval any time after approval of a tentative plat and construction plans, if required. Final check plats are required for all previously unrecorded lot subdivision plats, amended or resubdivision plats and minor subdivisions, After the final check plat has been reviewed and commented upon by the planning commission or director of planning, the subdivider may subtuit the record plat for recordation. Once the record plat ha~q been recorded, lots in the subdivision may be sold, (.8) Changes tO a record plat may be made by submitting an amended or resubdivision plat in accordance with sections 17-35 and 36. _Co) Procedure for Approving Tentative Plats. Adjusted Tentative Plats and Tentative Renewals. (1) Unless otherwise required, completed applications and plats submitted by subdividers tO the director of planning, shal! be reviewed and approved under the administrative review and approval procedure set forth in subsection (A) of this section unless the subdivider elects to submit the completed application and plat for review and approval under the planning commission review and approval procedure set forth in subsection (B) of this section. During the administrative review procedure, the subdivider or director of Planning may amend the application and refer the plat to the planning commission for approval, The submission to the director of planning of a completed application shall grant the county and its agents the right to enter the property at all reasonable, times for the purpose of inspecting the property in conjunction with the review of the proposed subdivision. (A) The following procedure shall be followed for administrative review and approval of tentative plats and adjusted tentative plats; (i) The subdivider shall prepare a tentative plat for all proposed subdivisions excluding minor subdivisions in accordance with the provisions of division 2 of this article.-and submit such plat to the director of planning who shall determine that the plat is in Conformity with the provisions of this chapter, and obtain recommendations from the applicable departments and other public entities, The subdivider shall have the right to defer receipt of the recommendations for a maximum of ninety (90) calendar days fror,, the date of submission, The deferral request shall be made in writing to the director of planning. After receipt of such recommendations, the director of planning shall'. 23 1. Approve such graphically correct tentative plat submission with or without conditions. Approval shall be made not less than twenty-two (22) calendar days nor more thirty (30) calendar days after receipt of a complete tentative plat submission unless the subdivider requests a deferral, or 2. Disapprove the tentative plat providing written findings giving specific reasons for disapproval to the subdivider within thirty (30) calendar days after receipt of a completed tentative plat submission unless the subdivider requests a deferral. Such reasons shall relate to issues which prevent the approval of the plat. 3. Refer the plat to the planning commission for review, if the director receives written request from an adjacent property, owner or property, owner directly across the street from the property_ or an adjacent property owner within fifteen (15) calendar days of the date of the sign posting and such request relates to the proposed location of streets, water, wastewater, stormwater conveyance systems and stormwater facilities or to the implementation of conditions of zoning required to be complied with at time of tentative plat approval, 4. If the director of planning fails to approve or disapprove a tentative plat adjusted plat or tentative renewal within sixty_ (60) calendar days after submittal of the tentative, unless the subdivider requests a deferral, the subdivider may petition the Chesterfield Circuit Court in accordance with state law. (ii) Approved tentative plats shall be valid for five (5) years from the date of approval. Adjusted and substitute tentative plats shall expire on the date of the initial tentative expiration. (iii) Tentative plat renewals shall be prepared and submitted in accordance with section 17 32 (b) for initial tentative plat approval. Applications for tentative renewal shall be submitted at least thirty (30) calendar days prior to expiration, The director of planning may renew tentative plats for additional five-year periods subject to all previously imposed conditions or irnpose new conditions based upon applicable codes and ordinances not in effect at the time of the original approval or changes in the built environment. When thc subdivider proposes changes to the approved tentative, renewal requests shall be evaluated by the director of planning who may deem the submission to constitute a new tentative plat, (iv) The Planning commission reserves the right to recall any portion of an approved tentative plat that has not been recorded, 03) The following procedure shall be followed for planning commission review and approval of tentative plats; (i) The subdivider shall prepare a tentative plat which is in accordance with the provisions 24 060 of division 2 of this article. The director of planning shall obtain the recommendations from the applicable departments and other public entities and submit a report to the planning commission outlining the recommendations. After receipt of such report, the planning commission shall make one of the following two decisions. 1. Approve such tentative plat with or without conditions within six .I~ (60) calendar days after submission of the completed application including a referral of the final approval to staff to insure that any required graphical changes are made, Deferral of approval of the plat at the subdivider's request to enable the subdivider to make changes shall be deemed tO extend the decision deadline date. 2. Disapprove the tentative plat within sixty (60) calendar days after submission of the completed application. Written findings giving specific reasons for disapproval shall be reported to the subdivider at the time of disapproval. Such reasons shall also state the modifications or corrections as will permit approval of the plat. Deferral of approval of the plat at the subdivider's request to enable the subdivider to make changes shall be deemed to extend the decision deadline date If the planning commission fails to approve or disapprove a tentative plat. adjusted plat or tentative renewal within six.ty (60) calendar days after submission of the comr~leted application the subdivider may petition the Chesterfield Circuit Court in accordance with state law. An_v deferral at the subdivider's request shall be deemed to have extended the decision deadline date. (ii) Approved tentative plats shall be valid for five (5) years from the date of approval. Adjusted and substitute tentative plats shall expire on the date of the initial tentative expiration, (iii) Unless specifically approved otherwise, adjustment or renewal of tentative plats approved by the planning commission will be performed by the planning commission pursuant to provisions of Section 17-32 (b) (1) c. (iv) The plavning commission reserves the right tO recall any portion of an approved tentative plat that has not been recorded. (C) Procedure for posting of public notices on property, (i) The director of planning upon receipt of a tentative, adjusted tentative, tentative renewal or minor subdivision tirol check plat application shall post a sign on the subject property to inform the public of the application. Such posting must occur for at least twenty-one (21) calendar days before: 1. the planning commission hearing on any adjusted tentative, tentative renewal or minor subdivision final check plat. or 2. the date of administrative approval of a tentative, adjusted tentative, tentativc 25 renewal or minor subdivision final check plat, (ii). No approval of an initial tentative submission may occur until after the twenty-one (21) day notice period. An application will not be considered complete until the twenty- one (21) day notice period has expired. If the director of planning receives written notice from an adjacent property owner or property owner directly across the .street from the property, or an adjacent property owner concerned about conditions solely relating to the proposed location of streets, water, wa~tewater, stormwater conveyance systems, and stormwater facilities or to the implementation of conditions of zoning required to be complied with and irnplemented at the time of tentative approval, within fifteen (15) calendar days of the posting of the sign for a plat under administrative review, the director shall refer the plat to the planning commission for review. The review will be conducted as set forth in subsection (B), (iii) The notice provided for by this section shall also be posted at reasonable interv.a.l.q along streets abutting the subject property, or. if there is no abutting street, then at the proposed street entrance to the property. The notice shall be posted in locations so as to be reasonably visible from the street(s). The validity of any action on an application, or an appeal as provided for in this section, shall not be affected by the ur_authorized removal of a notice which has been duly posted in accordance with this section. (D) Procedure for Review of Construction Plans (ii) (iii) Prior to submitting construction plans, subdividers shall obtain tentative plat approval. All construction plans shall be submitted to the director of environmental engineering for distribution to applicable departments and agencies for review and approval. Issuance of a land disturbance permit by the erosion and sediment program administrator shall constitute notification that the construction plans have been approved, (E) Procedure for Review of Final Check Plats. (i) Prior to submitting final check Plats for subdivisions that require construction plans subdividers shall submit those plans and obtain approval from the director of environmental engineering. (ii) Final check plats shall be submitted for all previously unrecorded subdivision plats amended or resubdivision plat and minor subdivisions. 1. The subdivider shall prepare and submit to the director of planning paper copies of the final check plat incorporating all requirements of an approved and non expired tentative plat and approved construction drawings and in accordance with 26 the provisions of division 3 of this article. However. the tentative plat may expire during the final check process, 2. A subdivider proposing an amended or resubdivisi0n plat shall prepare and submit to the director of planning paper copies of the final check plat in cornpliance with the provisions of division 3 of this article, 3. A subdivider proposing a minor subdivision shall prepare and submit to the director of planning paper copies of the final check plat in compliance with the provisions of division 3 of this article. Conditions irnposed on the project resulting from the review of a minor subdivision shall be considered tentative plat approval conditions. Notice of the proposed minor subdivision shall be posted on the affected property as required in section 17-32, Administrative delivery, of conditions to the subdivider shall constitute a final review of the plat, (iii) The director of planning shall review the fin.a! check plat and all necessary_ certificates to determine its conformity_ with the approved tentative plat if applicable and the requirements established in this chapter and obtain comments from other departments and public entities within thirty. (30) calendar days of its submission unless the time is extended by written request of the subdivider, The director of planning shall notify_ the subdivider of required changes to inco~orate in the preparation of the record plat: or send such plat to the planning commission for their recommendation as to final action thereon if the subdivider and director of planning differ as to the plats compliance with requirements of the Code or tentative conditions, (iv) The director of environmental engineering shall review the plat and verify, the items required in section 17- 43 have been provided, and 1. The Richmond Regional /Crater Planning District road name approval is current. 2. Payment in the appropriate amount, made to the treasurer of Chesterfield County.. has been provided for new street signs and the streetlight fees including the program administration fee, 3. All bonding required by section 1%73 is in force. 4. A copy of the subdivider's snow removal contract has been received, 5. All erosion control ordinance requirements, including satisfactory implementation and/or maintenance of erosion control measures in the field, have been fulfilled, 6. No areas within any proposed subdivision or resubdivision plat shall be set 27 aside for future use or otherwise carry the designation "reserved." (v) After the final check plat has been reviewed and commented upon by the director of planning, the subdivider may submit the record plat for recordation inco~orating the final check plat comments, (vi) Final check plat review comments are valid for a period of six (6) months durin~ which time the record plat must be submitted for approval. If record plats are not submitted within this period, the subdivider shall submit a new application, fee and final check plat for review, (F) Procedure for Approval of Record Plats. (i) The subdivider shall submit to the director of planning one (1) print conforming tO the, Virginia State Library. and Archives Standards for plats and two (2) transparencies (photographic positive polyester film) of the record plat. (ii) An authorized staff member of the planning department shall review and sign the plat if it is determined to be in compliance with the planning department's final check comments. The plat will then be forwarded tO the director of environmental engineering. (iii) After the authorized staff member of the planning department signs the plat, the director of environmental engineering shall review the plat and verify_ the items required in section 17-43 have been provided and, 1. The plat has been approved for recordation by the assessor's office and GIS to include House Numbering, 2. The Richmond Regional/Crater Planning District road name approval is current. 3. Payment in the appropriate amount, made tO the treasurer of Chesterfield County, has been provided for new street signs and the streetlight fees including the program administration fee. 4. All bonding required by section 17-73 is in force 5. A copy of the subdivider's snow removal contract has been received. 6. All erosion control ordinance requirements, including satisfactory irnplementation and/or maintenance of erosion control measures in the field, have, been fulfille0, If the plat is determined to be in compliance with the above and applicable sections of thc Code. the director of environmental engineering shall sign the plat, The director of 28 environmental engineering shall not approve a plat that has not been verified by either the director of utilities as meeting utility, requirements or the director of the health department if utilizing wells and/or on-site disposal. The subdivider shall have six (6) months from the date of submission of the record plat to achieve compliance and obtain approval from the director of environmental engineering, If the subdivider fails to obtain approval within that timeframe, the subdivider shall resubmit the plat, with a new application and fee beginning at the final check plat submission. The tentative plat must be current if a resubmission is required. (iv) The director of environmental engineering shall return the plat to the director of planning who shall sign the plat upon receipt. The director of planning shall not approve a plat for recordation that has not been approved by the director of environmental en_eineering. Administrative approval or disapproval shall constitute a final decision on the plat, Once the plat has been approved by all applicable departments, the director of planning shall submit the print to be recorded in the clerk's office of the circuit court of the county, retain one mylar for the planning department and send the second mylar to the environmental engineering department, State law reference(s). Code of Virginia §15.2-2258 - 2261, D%.,~LIUII I t-.Jo[l/g,, ~LIIU U ~It, IIUK{,[ LII~ L~.~IIL4J, LIyU {;llylJiUViJ.1 UUIUI I~tlD%.~ l%~ltlll~,~U OJ /)¢~.~LIUII I I Sec. 17-33. Procedure for appeals (a) If the director of planning or the planning commission does not act upon the proposed tentative plat within sixty (60) calendar dayS from the date the completed armlication has bee,, submitted, the subdivider, after ten (10) calendar days written notice to the pl~,~ning commission, may petition thc circuit court of the county to decide whether the plat should or should not 29 approved in accordance with state law. Deferral of approval of the tentative plat at the subdivider's request to enable the subdivider to make changes shall be deemed to extend the decision deadline date, ~) If the director of planning or the planning commission takes action on a tentative plat and the subdivider contends that such action was not consistent with this chapter, or was arbitrary, or capricious, an appeal may be filed with the circuit cour[ of the county in accordance with state !aw, (c) If the director of planning or the planning commission does not act upon the proposed final check or record plat within sixty. (60) calendar days from the date the application was submitted, the subdivider, after ten (10) calendar days written notice to the planning commission, m.a.y ~tition the circuit court of the county to decide whether the plat should or should not be approved in accordance with state law. Deferral of approval of the plat at the subdivider's reouest to enable the subdivider to make changes shall be deemed to extend the decision deadline dhte. (d) If the director of planning or the planning commission takes action on a final check or record plat and the subdivider contends that such action was not consistent with this chapter, or wa.,: arbitrary, or capricious, an appeal may be filed with the circuit court of the county in accordance with state law, State law reference(s). Code of Virginia. _~ 15.2-2259, 2260. Sec. 17-34. Vacation, alteration, etc,, of recorded subdivision. Record plats may be changed, altered or vacated as provided by state law and ~ 16-31 of thc~ State law reference(s). Code of Virginia. $~ 15.2.2270 to - 2278. 30 OGG ~Ut~ll IIIUUlIIk~CLtlUIID k]/ corrections aa 31 UlCUipUlaCUl~ all I~Ii~U lllUUillCatlUl~ LU Ui~ t~ll~tiV¢ plat ~l~appiu~ ~g~ll 1111~1 plat. lllU ~ll~tUl vi ~1~1~11~ ~llall ll~t aD,luau a ~lat ivl l~vluatlUll ~UUIIUL plO, La XUI 32 LJ.l~ _IJIO-L 131J. Utlik/ UL ~)/zuu. IiJ J.J. UL Lit.,, d._lJLYlUyi.,ikl. 111~.* k,~UIII L ~110.11 ll~(iJ. LJ. lk, III~ZLLLI.,I glll.U. J. IJ. OJ'kq,., (11J. U I. ail ~liJ~Yiil~llUl¢ I~Litlii¢iXXUXiL~ UI LILU &UXUIi~ UIUIIXalIL~L~ ~ii~lii UI. ilIUL. · J. k.~Uiliil~.,L v~itli "'ii a[Y~YlU¥~,,ki ~Uilk~l.~[YC Uk~¥t,,iUpilik,liL pi~}il. 33 34 0 VO llI~ Ill.lit ~ll~al IIUL [lClllL I~((%IV~i L~J Ct ~tLUtlI¥1~IUII pIUiJU3(11 Il (lllJ UI LII~ IUIIUYYIII[ 35 Sec. 17-35. Amended and resubdivision plats, (a) All amended or resubdivision plats shall be submitted to the director of planning for review prior to recordation. If based upon a review of the proposed alteration to the record vlat. the director of planning determines that the changes to the record plat are of a sufficient m~gnitude to require a new tentative plat. the amended or resubdivision plat shall not be approved and a new tentative plat must be submitted and ar)proved in accordance with Section 17-32 (1). No amended or resubdivision plats shall be recorded until approved in the same manner as record plats per section 17-32 (5), (b) In districts zoned for residential or residential townhouse uses, no resubdivision shall be approved where the newly created lot(s) are smaller than the average lot size and lot width of other lots in that block. However, this requirement shall not apply to the resubdivision of lots within an existing subdivision where the purpose is to adjust lot lines and no new lots are created, or where the resubdivision involves a submission of a new tentative plat that incorporates mor~i: than ninety_ (90) percent of the originally recorded block Or section. State law reference(s). Code of Virginia, § 15.2-2275. Sec. 17-36. Recordation of subdivision plat prior to compliance with zoning ordinance prohibited. pl ---'-":-':--'-- -" .... by No at for a lot subdivision,,,-" a o,~,_,~,,o,,.,, ,.,{ ,,l,u shall be recorded .............. ,,,,~ ~uo,~lv,,~e~ unless and-until the land area is included within a residential, or townhouse residential zoning district or is a residential use in a commercial zoning district as defined by chapter 19 of this Code. ,,---,- ,,,,,o § ,o 17) State law reference(s). Code of Virginia. ~ 15.2-2254, 36 DIVISION 2. PREPARATION AND CONTENTS OF TENTATIVE PLATS* Sec. 17-37. Generally. (a) Every proposed lot-subdivision excluding minor subdivisions shall be submitted to the director of planning or the planning commission for tentative approval in accordance with the provisions of section 17-32 55 in the form of a tentative plat prior to the submission of a f'mal check plat. The tentative plat is not intended to be a f'mal check plat and shall be prepared in such form as not to be confused with a final check plat. Its purpose is to show graphically all facts needed for to enable the director of planning or the planning commission and other public entities bodies to determine whether the proposed subdivision layout of-theqand in qu¢$tioii is in compliance with state law. the Code and conditions of zonine approval. --""' ....... ~' ..... '- ..... ~' · pubHeqatere~. The plat shall be prepared by the subdivider ( i.e., the owner of the land. planners, architects, landscape architects, surveyors, engineers and others having training and experiencc~ in subdivision planning or design). (b) The graphic and descriptive items set out in sections 17-38,~,,~---' 17-40 are required to be shown on the tentative plat. The lack of information under any item specified herein, or improper information supplied by the subdivider, may be cause for rejection as an incomplete application or disapproval of a tentative plat or rcjcction ,~ an .~,~.,vl,~L~ ,~vt~-,~--,,-. t,~,~,~,~ ~, o, ~.o.' o ~-.o)~ ~ ° * State law reference,. ~--,,~-~2 ,,~ ~,,.,,.,~ ,,, supcrvisors to ..... : ........ :-- pl .,~w'-,~ -,-l[-[~,,~ at Code of Virginia. § 15 ' ~'' ~ Sec. 17-38. Required information. Written application for approval by the mmer~x-~ subdivider owncr's rcprcscntativc, shall accompany eachjj&!lliggl_9.~ tentative, substitute, adjusted, or tentative renewal plat. The tentative plat shall be drawn at a scale no greater than one inch equals fifty. (50) feet for townhous~: subdivisions: other subdivisions shall be at a scale of one inch equals one hundred (100) feet. Variations in scale may be made upon request at the discretion of the director of planning, plat shall show correctly the following information: (a{) Name for file identification la. Name of subdivision if property is within an existing subdivision. Proposed name~,, ,u, w. ....., ~. [Jl~..vluu~lj plaLtl.~uaUOUlVlOlUll. 111¢ IJi,opua¢U llatllc which shall not duplicate the name of any existing or tentatively ar>proved proposed subdivision or scrics of names of streets or commercial developments in--the county. (bi) Location and description of the property. Location of property by tax identification 37 073 number(s) pareekntm~ers as designated on county tax property maps. Basic facts and proposals pertaining to the property shown as general notes:r Ia. Size of-traet in acres7 or of ,~,~,.~ ~ki~,. any, in square feet. 2b. Existing zoning classification(s), and applicable zoning cases number(~) of subject th rty ---' --': ............... -' ' e prope ,,,u auda~ix, p~kip~xty, 3. Proffers and / or conditions of zoning and ~chematic plan conditions. 4_e. Number of lots proposed in subdivision. 5d. Area of lots, streets, open space and common space proposed: minimum, average and maximum lot size in square feet. fie. Proposed use type of water and wastewater scwcr facilities. 7__,. Method of street stormwater conveyance, illikilillatikiil aa Lki ii[iiLa-kil-WaJ allU ~Oa[.~IIXViiLa. ~..~itaClUii kix ~liiJ UAi3Lili[ legal II[IIL-~JI-W~I..y ~.Jl ~.~O.a~lll~,~ll~ ~1.11~.~[111[ [11~ IJl~JtJ~lL,y. [bkikl[.~ lJl *o~ 10. 1-1 A~-iyki,.~"- ......... t,~kit-,.,~,,~*,' ..... ~-,~-~' ..3- _Pparcels or land intended to be dedicated7 or conveyed,~m'ese-r~t for public use, and the conditions proposed for such disposal and use as specified in sections 17 71 - Date. revision dates, and scale. The name. mailing address, street address, phone number, and fax number and e mail address if available of the owner(s), proposed owner(s) and the subdivider 11. The method by which Chesapeake Bay Protection Act ( CBPA )cornpliance is achieved. Basic facts and proposals pertaining to the property including the following shall be graphically shown; 1. Graphic scale. North American Datum (NAD) 83 north arrow and vicinity_ map. 2. The length and bearing of the exterior boundaries of the subdivision. Dimensions 38 0?4 !0. .11. shall be expressed in feet at a minimum to the first decimal point. Adjacent subdivision name(s), adjacent parcel owner name(s) and tax identification number(s), side boundary, lines of adjoining lots and parcels and county boundary. line if applicable, Existing zoning boundaries on the property and adjacent property_. Location. width, state route numbers and names of all existing and platted streets, alleys, and other rights of ways and existing onsite and offsite easements, buildings, bridges, on or adjacent to the tract and other pertinent data as determined by the director of planning. Layout. and width, of all proposed lots. streets with centerline curve data and names per County ordinance, alleys, sidewalks, offsite easements for wastewater, water and stormwater intended to serve the property. All lots shown shall be, buildable lots (this may require a building envelope tO be shown). The layout and size of the existing and proposed wastewater, water m,ains, fire hydrants, and existing storm sewers/culverts, and other underground structures within the tract or immediately adjacent thereto, The utility layout shall be consistent with the County's water and sewer specifications and procedures. Any deviation must be requested in writing and approved by the director of utilities. Water and wastewater connections shall be graphically shown where feasible. otherwise a note indicating the approximate distance and contract number of the existing water / wastewater line(s). Water and wastewater lines shown shall not be located within any stormwater management or best management plan facility unless approved by the directors of environmental engineering and utilities. Approximate dimensions of lots and sequential lot numbers. Proposed front building setback lines on lots where the minimum 10t width is not met at the minimum setback line, Labeled contours at vertical intervals of not more than five (5) feet and at more frequent intervals if required by the director of planning for land with flat topography. Labeling shall occur at ten (10) foot vertical interval. Source of topography and mean sea level datum shall be stated on the plat. U.S. Geologic, Survey (USGS) quadrangle sheets shall not be an acceptable source. All existing USGS or county control monuments for surveying purposes located on the property.. The limits of established watercourses, drainage ditches, manmade open channels, floodplains, preliminary, wetland boundaries, conservation areas. RPAs. RMAs, and anproximate location and surface area of BMP's. 39 12, Chesapeake Bay preservation areas described in chapter 19, 13, All proposed street names per county ordinance. 14, The location and approximate size of any cemeteries, grave, object or structure marking a place of burial. 15. Recorded sections depicting the actual recorded layout with recordation dates and state route numbers on streets shall be clearly shown for tentative renewals, amended or substitute Plats, 16, The location and width of any required buffers, landscape strips or tree preservation areas. (e) An overall conceptual subdivision plan must be submitted in accordance with section 1740 by (1) subdividers seeking tentative approval for a subdivision in phases, or (2) subdividers proposing a development that contains mixed uses. although all uses may be residential in nature, or (3) subdividers required by zoning to submit an overall concePBml subdivision plan. The portion of the plan covered by the tentative plat must be outlined. The overall conceptual subdivision plan shall be updated to reflect previously approved layouts and shall be submitted with each initial tentative, tentative renewal, amended or substitute tentative plat submission. Special Limited Power of Attorney only for nonowner/developer submissions. Water flow calculations shall accompany the initial tentative plat submittal. Flow requirements shall meet Fire Department regulations, Flow test submittal requirements shall be per Chesterfield Department of Utilities specifications, ih) Chesapeake Bay Preservation Act plan and calculations, (i) Letter from the appropriate regional planning district commission indicating approval of all street names. (,i) Virginia Department of Transportation checklist shall accompany initial submission. (k) Every ·,,, tentative plat must have ~-~" . ~,,.,, o,..,.~w~,, ,~,~.,,~,[ complete information to be accer~ted. -~_.,_ ~ Subdivisions that contain easements for petroleum or natural gas-based products shall provide the easement holder with a copy of the tentative plat. Evidence of the submission shall be provided to the director of planning. State law reference(s). Code of Virginia. ~_~ 15.2-2240 to -2242.-2258,- 2260, 40 076 Sec. 17-39.1'Ia~ sketch required. Plat reductions required. Fi I31fl. L ~,IkL~Lg-II ~llall Ug- ~)tlb'llllLLg-tl W'AU.I (111 Lg-llLfl,LlYg- id/iiL~). I,L, lYUAv .LYlO~ (a) A reduced copy of the tentative plat to 8,5 x 11 inches shall accompany each submission, (b) A copy of the tentative plat on a maximum sheet size of 24 x 36 inches shall accompany each submission if the overall rflat_ exceeds one sheet of this size. '~" (c) If available, upon request a digital copy of the plat shall be supplied in a format acceptable to the director of environmental engineering, State law reference(s), Code of Virginia, § 15.2-2260, [Jlfl,L i~llfl,ll i~llk~lq/ g-k~llSg-~l~ ~111 l/i~ ltl,g-g- LII5 [IJ L/fl, Lg-, ~)g-fl. lg-m fl,lltl IIUIUI IJUIIIL. ~/a] lilt, lYllJlyu/)k~u. ~uUU. IYl/)lUll llfllllg- fl,llU. IL/) 1Ug, fl,LIUll. Oral Yg-.yU.L UI g-ll~lllg-g-.L .L. Ilg-].~9'fl,llll{'~ LI.I~,.,, .L.,JI(XL,~ CTIIU. LIIU ~ULLlg-g- UI LILIg- WILII ~,,J-g-g-~J. UUUK .Lt.,,lg-lg-llg-~,,,~. I,d] bUg-al, lUll fl,llU llfl,lllg-~ UI O. ti. Jllg-g-lll. i)llUUl¥1~lUll~ fl, llti Llig- U!~'II~,I~ UI d, UIUIIIIII~_.~ ~ IJfl,lt, g-l~ OlF 41 077 /'1 Ah A 11 ~.1 IJ 111~' lUg, al. lUll UI O.,ll.y i~l~lYL,,~ UU.~..,~,I. Ui ~LItI~LU.I~.., llld. ll~Ul~ II. ,[JldL,4.,. UI L/UXI~3,1. Sec. 1%40. Overall conceptual subdivision plan. When required for tentative plat approval per section 17-38, an overall conceptual subdivision plan shall be prepared by the subdivider to cover all area up to the limits of the parcel(s) thai was zoned. The conceptual subdivision plan shall be drawn at a scale that will fit on a sheet size of 24 x 36 inches. The plat shall show correctly the following information: /al Name for file identification. (b) Location and description of the property, Location of property by tax 42 (c) (d) identification number(s) as designated on county property maps. Basic facts and proposals pertaining to the property including the following in general notes: 1. Overall size in acres, Existing zoning classification(s).applicable zoning case(s), and zoning boundaries of the property, and adjacent property. 3. Approximate number of lots, 4. Proposed use of water and wastewater facilities. 5. Date. revision dates, scale. The name. mailing address, street address, and phone number and fax number and e-mail address if available of the owner(s), proposed owner(s) and the subdivider, Basic facts and proposals pertaining to the property including the following in graphic form: 1. Graphic scale, north arrow and vicinity m,ap. Subdivision names and side boundary, lines of adjoining lots and parcels. Existing zoning boundaries of the property and adjacent property. Location. and names of all existing and platted streets, Approximate location of all thoroughfare plan and residential collector streets, g pedestrian circulation layout. Residential pods with approximate acreage and densi .ty. Access poinB from pods to the roadway network. Any pod submitted for tentative approval shall be shown as depicted on that plat. Approximate layout of large water mains, trunk wastewater lines, limits of established floodplains, available wetland data, conservation areas, RPA limits. RMAs location, and location of proposed BMP's. Contours at vertical intervals properly labeled of not more than five (5) feet, 43 8. Parcels or land intended to be dedicated or conveyed for public use. State law reference(s). Code of Virginia. ~ 15,2-2260, DIVISION 3. PREPARATION AND CONTENTS OF FINAL CHECK AND RECORD PLATS*- Sec. 17-41. General1, ,,' ..... Final check and record plats may constitute all or only a portion of the area contained in the approved tentative plat and approved construction plans; provided, that the public improvements to be constructed in the area covered by the final check and record plat are sufficient by and of themselves to accomplish a proper development and to provide adequately for the health, safety and convenience of the proposed residents therein and for adequate access to adjacent areas. The section limits of the final check and record plats shall have a contiguous lot and street network State law reference(s). Code of Virginia, § 15.2-2241. Sec. 17-42. Subdivision Review ' ~rv..,~,~L,,,-. for approval. A complete afirpplication by fhe-ownea'-~e the subdivider owncr's reprcscntativc for approval shall accompany each final check and record plat. Such application shall include and--eonm/n the following information: (a2) An_v e~xisting or proposed covenants and homeowner association documents required by section 19-560 if applicable or if required by zoning or tentative condition,--ff--a~. (bS) Name and mailing address, street address, ~ telephone number, and fax number and e-mail address if available, of the owner, subdivider en'qfi~tge~t and the certified professional engineer as applicable or land surveyor who prepares the plat. (.C~) 1. Whenever any pond, lake or similar body of water is proposed to be located within 10tS ~,~ aujavut,~ -u auuu, vm,Ofi, the subdivider ~' .... ' .... ' u,~,.,,_,~,~, or cnginc¢, shall present a plan to the director of environmental engineering and the county attorney's office for review and approval outlining any construction to occur and a proposed plan for the indemnification and perpetual maintenance of any such body of water. 2. Whenever any pond. lake or similar body of water is proposed to be located within common area or open space, the subdivider shall present the recorded articles of incorporation for a homeowners association and draft restrictive covenants to the director 44 )UO of environmental engineering and the county attorney's office for review and approval. These documents shall outline any construction to Occur and shall contain a proposed pl.an noting the indemnification and responsibilities of the homeowners association in any perpetual maintenance of any such body of water. (d) Payment in the appropriate amount for new street signs and for the streetlight fees including the program administration shall be submitted to the director of environmental engineering with the record plat. (e) A copy of the valid snow removal contract shall be submitted to the director of environmental engineering with the final check plat or prior to submission of the record plat. (f) A letter from the appropriate regional review agency indicating approval of all street names if requested by the director of environmental engineering t,~,,u,~ ~,,o, § ~o..-,~3) State law reference(s). Code of Virginia. ~ 15.2-2241, Sec. 17-43. Required information Fhial plat. The final check and record plat sheet(s) shall be 16 inches by 24 inches and shall be prepared~ signed and sealed by a certified professional engineer as applicable or land surveyor. The final check and record plat -~"~- ....'-~:---'~:--- ,,. ~.,. ,~,o,,,.,~,,. shall conform to the approved hyemtxyf-h~ tentative plat and atmroved_ _ construction _t~lans, ---'~--....~ changes arc a~,v,,.,,,~,~ ~,,,~ The final check and record _t)lats shall show on its ~,~"-~ the following information: (a-l:) ° ....... ~' ':"- ~' "- ......... ~' '~-- '--~ --'~:-"~'~" Surveyor' certification stati "To the best of mY knowledge and belief all of the requirements as set forth in the ordinance for approving plats of subdivisions in Chesterfield County. Virginia have been cornplied with. Monuments will be set by ( insert date)." (h~) Subdivision certificate stating "The platting or dedication of the following described land (here insert a correct description of the land to be subdivided) is with the free consent and in accordance with the desire of the undersigned owners, proprietors and trustees, if an.v. All easements and streets are of the width and extent shown and are dedicated to the County of Chesterfield free and unrestricted by any previous agreements or easements except as noted on this plat as of the time of recordation, The dedication of easements to the County of Chesterfield. includes granting the right to make reasonable use of adjoinin_v land for construction and maintenance of public facilities within the boundaries of easements shown hereon. All easements are for surface and underground drainage and underground utilities except as restricted in use on this plat." If there is an easemeni granted for street light installation it shall be included in this statement and read as follows "An additional easement of five (5) feet on all lots ad_iacent to right of ways is dedicated 45 to the County of Chesterfield for future street light installation." This statement shall be siened bv such person and duly notarized, signed by "-- t-,*,-~,-~,-. ,-- -~,.. --,- t-,,-[ setting (ca) Source of title ~'--: .... ' ..... ,..,,~;,,~l ~ ,.~,.,~,~,.,. signed by the preparer of the plat setting forth the ~ource of the title of the owner(s) of the land subdivided indicating the date. deed book and page and the place of record of the last instrument in the chain of title. When the plat is of land acquired from more than one source of title, the outlines of the several parcels shall be indicated uuon such ulat. ~5-) The followine_ information shall be noted on the plat; ~,A ,, notes as pe~ment' '-[,, "--,,,~ (1) lam use. (2) zo~g classification(s), applicable zo~ng case number(s), Proffers, coMitions of zo~g. schematic and / or tentative plat conditio~ relating to co~tmction such as bulk exceptions, minimum square footage, colors, required improvements 0n lots or restrictions on lots, (3) me,od of street drainage. (4) method of wastewater aM water. (5) total number of lots. (6) area in lots. streets, and open ~pace, (7) total subdivision acreage. Property location as to corresponding county tax identification numbers tax-map fi'-h) Vicinity map. (g) Sequentially numbered lots, [~] l t/L/ti ~ll[,~ll BIIUlqii UII Lilt [.Jlllt~ ilI~,~iLlt~ill~ 3LIt,.~,.,L3 /liitl LULIII llJ.[,~ll U[,~UI~.~I:I. Lk~.J. Ltl lJLltJiib [i~e. 46 ~iuj i u}~li llLllllUk, l Ui IUL~ III~.~IUU~U UII LIIL~ .(hi-t-) Area in square feet Selmre-foota~ of each individual lot, if requested by the director of planning depama'mat. 2t-2-) Date, scale and north arrow per NAD83. ~it-3-) Thc exact length and bearing of all lot lines and cumulative total of each perimeter tangent dimension. The following information shall be shown in a curve table for each non-tangent curve in the survey: chord bearing, chord distance, radius, delta, tangent and arc length. 1~-1-4) Location; and width and-s/ze of all street rights-of-way and easements. Where any easement bisects a lot. provide tiedowns to property corners. (1) All street names per county ordinance, approved by the director of environmental engineering. BI~t-5-) Location itll0.JsTl~Oing ~ to include conservation areas and areas of wetlands if applicable, of RPA'$ floodptaim-with tielines or tiedowns. (n) A note has been provided with an asterisk on each lot between RPA limits and creek. "Conservation area to remain in its natural state, no structure tO be located within the (o) Location of U.S, Army Corps of Engineers (USACOE) or Commonwealth of Virginia jurisdictional wetlands and waters of the United States and associated building setbacks ~) A note with corresponding reference Symbol for wetlands stating "U.S. Army Corps of Engineers or Commonwealth of Virginia jurisdictional wetlands not to be disturbed without written permission from the Corps or the Department of Environmental Quali _ry." (q) Location and labeling of floodplains with survey tielines and / or tiedowns and backwater location(s) and elevation(s). (r 36) Those areas to be dedicated for public use in accordance with section 1%71, t-748. (.~_-t-7) Two Vireinia state olane system coordinate points (t) Location of existing U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) or county monument, if located within the subdivision, 01-1-8-) The location of any cemeteries, grave, object or structure marking a place of burial 47 and associated access easement. ~_-1-9-) Chesapeake Bay preservation areas described in chapter 19. (w) A note indicating the method of CBPA cornpliance, the type of facili .ty utilized, as well as the recordation information. (X) SWM/BMP maintenance responsibilities. (y) A note indicating that the BMP/storm water management maintenance agreement has been recorded including the deed book and page number reference for the agreement. (z) A note indicating that any BMP contained within the lot limits will become the sole maintenance responsibili .ty of the lot owners. (aa) Location and labeling of open space and common areas as to ownership and maintenance responsibilities. (bb) Minimum finished floor (MFF) elevations for lots, as applicable, (cc) Minimum crawl space (MCS) elevations for 10ts, as applicable. (dd) Lots are shown as NBp as appropriate. (ee) Location and labeling of buffers, landscape strips or tree preservation areas as to width, and applicable restrictions. State law reference(s)~ --'-¢u-'~'[,. ~,~ ~.~a~ w,~[~, Code of Virginiar § §~.,.~--.,,~' ~ ~ ~"~- 15,2-2241,- 2262. DIVISION 4. PREPARATION AND CONTENTS OF FINAL CHECK AND RECORD PLATS FOR RESIDENTIAL PARCEL SUBDIVISION AND PROPERTY LINE MODIFICATION Sec. 17-44. General (a) Any plat for non-residential usage shall be prominently labeled by the subdivider "Not for residential use" and the following statement" I, (INSERT NAME) affirm that I am the owner of the property_ depicted on this plat and do hereby affirm that the sale/transfer of this property is not for purposes of creating a parcel for residential use". With these two notes, the plat will not be subject to a review in accordance with this division. NO residential building permit will be approved on plats so labeled. No parcel plat shall be recorded that does not have these statements or does not comply with (b). 48 '"r (b) Subdividers. that intend that the property, shall be eligible to hay6 a residential building permit issued on it. shall submit the plat for review and approval in accordance with this chapter. There will be a two step process for review and approval. The first step will be the submission of a final check plat and the second step will be the Submission of the record plat. When the record plat is approved, it will be stamped, signed by the director of planning and recorded with the clerk of the court indicating the plat was determined to be in compliance as a parcel for residential usage in accordance with this division. (1) A residential parcel subdivision does not require the submission of a tentative plat. The subdivider may elect to submit a preliminary layout to the director of planning to obtain comments to guide the layout of the final check and record plats. The final check and record plat may constitute all or only a portion of the area contained in the parent parcel provided that the size of the remainder of the parent parcel after subdivision meets the minimum standards for a parcel. When the plat does not contain all of the area of the parent parcel, a sketch of the residential parcel subdivision in relation to the parent parcel shall be included on the plat. (2) The review will determine consistency with the comprehensive plan with respect to historic and visual resources: compliance with the applicable sections of the zoning ordinance dealing with residential uses. setbacks and parcel size: applicable sections of this chapter dealing with parcel width, frontage, and size: the general location of lakes, ponds, streams and RPA's as shown on the GIS; and requirements of the health department for wells and on-site wastewater disposal systems. (c) Parcel line modification plats may be submitted for an existing parcel that does not meet the current area or dimensional requirements of chapter 19. The existing parcel may be altered to increase the area subject to the following: (1) The parcel from which land is being transferred shall meet all applicable standards of this ch~ter and chapter 19 after the transfer is accomplished, A parcel line modification will not make a parcel buildable that was not created in accordance with the standards-in place at the time of its recordation unless it brings the resulting parcel into compliance with current standards. The parcel line modification does not create a new parcel, (2) The resulting parcel shall not become peculiarly shaped due to transfer, (3) The bulk standards on the resulting parcel will be based upon the applicable requirements at the time of the original recordation. (4) The plat shall show the original and proposed parcel boundaries and an original recordation date. with the deed. will. or plat book and page, State law referenCe(s). Code of Virginia. ~ 15.2-2241,- 2244. Sec.17-45. Procedure for residential parcel subdivision and parcel property line modification 49 approval. All completed applications and plats shall be submitted by subdividers to the director of planning to be reviewed and approved administratively as set forth below. During the review, the subdivider or director of planning may amend the application and refer the plat to the planning commission for approval. The submission to the director of planning of a cornpleted application shall grant the county, and its agents the right tO enter the property at all reasonable times for the pu~ose of inspecting the property, in conjunction with the review of the proposed subdivision. (a) The following procedure shall be followed for review of the residential parcel subdivision and parcel line modification final check plats: (1) The subdivider shall submit to the director of planning a completed application and three (3) prints of the proposed parcel line modification or residential parcel subdivision. Additionally. subdividers seeking approval for a residential parcel subdivision sh.a!l submit a copy of the report required by section 17-84 for the health depa .rtment use in conducting the on-site review. The subdivider may submit the report to the health department prior to submission of the final check plat. The review of the health department may take up to sixty (60) calendar days in accordance with state law. The on-site review shall be conducted in accordance with Code of Virginia § 32.1-163.5, (2) Within three (3) business days. an authorized staff member of the planning department shall review the plats for consistency with the requirements of this chapter, applicable sections of the zoning ordinance, the general location of lakes, ponds, streams, and RPA's. and consistency section with 19-508 for historic and visual resource sites included in the comprehensive plan. (3) The director of planning shall compile all comments including any from the health department after completing their on-site review and prepare a composite plat depictin~ any graphical changes required to the plat. (A) If the plat complies with all requirements, the composite final check plat shall be so noted and returned to the subdivider with any comments (B) If the plat does not comply with all requirements, the final check plat and a written explanation of the required changes sholl be returned to the subdivider for modification and resubmission. Co) The following procedure shall be followed for approval of residential parcel subdivision and parcel line modification record plats: (1) The subdivider shall submit to the director of planning four (4) prims conforming to the Virginia State Library and Archives Standards for record plats. (2) Within two (2) business days after submittal, an authorized staff member of the 50 planning department shall determine if the plats comply with the final check plat comments, and if determined to be in compliance shall stamp the plats, and forward them to the director of planning for ~igning, The stamp shall indicate that the plat is for residential purposes and has been reviewed and determined to be in cornpliance with the requirements of this division, Parcels exempted from the requirements of this division will not be eligible to obtain a residential building permit until such time it is reviewed and approved under the requirements of this division.. A. If the plat is not approved, the plat shall be returned to the subdivider with written findings giving specific reasons why the plat was not approved. Such reasons shall provide in general terms the modifications or corrections that will permit approval of the plat. (c) One (1) copy of the stamped signed plat shall be recorded in the clerk's office of the circuit court of the county. One (1) copy will be retained by the planning department, One (1) will bc forwarded to GIS. One (1) copy will be returned to the subdivider. (d) After recordation, the subdivider shall be permitted to sell parcels. State law reference(s). Code of Virginia. _~§ 15,2-2241,- 2244. Sec. 17-46. Residential parcel subdivision and parcel line modification plat requirements (a) A cornplete application by the subdivider for approval shall accompany each record plat, (b) The maximum record plat sheet size shall be 16 inches by 24 inches and shall be prepared, signed and sealed by a certified land surveyor. An area of four (4) inches by three (3) inches shall be left clear for the approval stamp, (1) The record plat shall have the following certificate~- (A) Surveyor's certification stating "I have personally read and believe to the best of my knowledge that the requirements for residential parcel, subdivisions and property_ lin~, modifications aS to required area, minimum width, frontage standards and the zoning ordinance for required parcel area and setbacks in Chesterfield County, Virginia has bee~! cornplied with. Plat bearings reflect NAD 83," (B) Source of title signed by the preparer of the plat setting forth the date, deed or will book and page. and the place of record of the last instrument in the chain of title, When the plat is of land acquired from more than one (1) source of title, the outlines of the several parcels shall be indicated upon such plat, (C) Advisory certificate "This plat is prepared on the basis of field surveys. Th~: 51 mapping information is not intended to represent all topographic and environmental features on the parcel which could limit or preclude buildability, Additional engineering research on such items as but not limited to: wetlands, floodplains, adequate culverts for driveways crossings of streams or floodplains, etc. may be required based upon individual parcel requirements at time of building permit review," (2) The record plat shall have the following information in notes' (A) Method of wastewater and water service, (B) Total number of parcels. (C) Total acreage, (D) Existing county tax identification numbers for each parcel involved. (3) The record plat shall graphically show the following: (A) Vicinity map, ~) Sequentially numbered parcels. (C) Area in acres of each parcel. (D) Date. scale and north arrow and bearings per NAD 83. (E) The length and bearing of all parcel lines and cumulative total of each perimeter tangent dimension referenced to NAD 83. The following information shall be shown in a curve table for each non-tangent curve in the survey; chord bearing, chord distance, radius, delta, tangent and arc length. (F) The location and labeling of lakes, ponds, streams, RPA's, historic sites or visual resources, (G) Two (2) Virginia state plane system coordinate points per NAD 1983 when new property, lines are not contiguous with existing property lines (H) The location of any cemeteries, graves, objects or structures marking a place of burial and associated access easement. State law reference(s)Code of Virginia, §§ 15,2 -2262, -2264. Secs. 17-47 4~--17-60. Reserved. 52 ARTICLE III. BEStCrN STANDARDS* DIVISION 1. MINIMUM STANDARDS AND IMPROVEMENTS REQUIRED 6E-NE-R:A-L-L-Y Sec. 17-61. Conformity to applicable requirements rules and regulations. ., ,~..,~,., ~., .,.. ,~..~,~,, ~.~..~ ~o,,o,,~ .~,,_ Aall subdivision ats shall co wi~ ~e foil ing' ........ ~: ........ ' .... ~ .... '~':~-- ~ appli bl (a-l-) The provisions of the Code of Virginia, tit. 15. I,,...-~- ..," ,~,.--' 7 t~r° ,,o. ~ ~-.,~,o' ~= ,.,-' seq.]Title 15.2 Chapter 22 Article 6 (.Virginia Code §§ 15.2-2240 through 15,2-2279). (.bi Chapter 8 of the Code of Chesterfield County, Erosion and Sediment Control Ordinance. (c~) Chapter 18 of the Code of Chesterfield County, Water and Sewer Ordinance. (d--2) Chapter 19 of the this Code of Chesterfield County, Zoning Ordinance. (e3) The Chesterfield General "" .... -' ....-' ...... '- ..... Comprehensive Plan_ (1~-¢) Code of Virginia, Title tit. 32.1, and the requirements rules of the state health department relating to lot size and lot elevation if the subdivision is not served by a public wastewater System sewer and provision for such service has not been made. (g_5) The requirements rules of the Virginia Ddepartment of T_transportation and the county transportation department including access control, rights of way dedication and construction of mitigating street improvements as relating to safety of acccss and the preservation of the public interest --~: (h-7) Other applicable laws, ordinances,_Policies -rotes and reaukements .,.s,.,..,,.is.'-'-'-- ~ State law reference(s). Code of Virginia..~ 15.2 -2260 53 ~,1] I IIUi Lt./ gl. liar I(IlIU-tlIDLUIUIII[ (lg, Ll¥lL.y UI g,UIILUIU~IXXb~., UIL~I~.,UIj (111 UIU31UII {lllti D~.,UJlIIr~LIL~LXUil ali ~.11] 11 I~..L.J. LI[.,.~L~,t~I) LII~,,, O._l.)_[Jll~O.,llL ,%8!n!1 DUUIIJ_I.L ~,.~gLI~.LIIO..LI~JII~ v~,~lli,ylll~ ItJL CI/L~I L/I VVIULil LU LIIL., .[.JllllLI. IIII~ IIUUIIII~LIUII UII [11~, ~/l~t. Sec. 17-62. Standa_rd conditions, The applicability of the following requirements will be determined at the time of tentative plat approval The subdivider will be notified of the applicable requirements in the approval letter, The requirements will be referred to as standard conditions without citing th-ii subsection. Cornpliance with these standard conditions must be achieved by the time of subsequent plan and plat submithal, (a) The requirements of the Environmental Engineering Reference Manual. Co) The requirements associated with obtaining a land disturbance permit from the environmental engineering department by; (i) providing satisfactory, documentation that all applicable federal and state wetlands permits have been obtained (ii) obtaining a land use permit from the Virginia Department of Transportation allowing access onto and construction within state maintained right of way. (c) The subdivider shall provide access easement(s) to the SWM/BMP(s) as required acceptable to the environmental engineering department prior to or in conjunction with recordation. 54 ODO (d) The dimensions and approximate location of all easements shall be shown on all final check and record plats. (e) A twenty-five (25) foot minimum setback shall be provided from the 100-year floodplain / backwater. (f) A twenty-five (25) foot minimum setback shall be provided from wetlands. (g) A twenty-five (25) foot minimum setback shall be provided from conservation areas. (h) Any required buffers are subject to the requirements of section 17-70. (i) Buffers areas are exclusive of setbacks, (j) A twenty (20) foot minimum setback for all structures shall be provided from any petroleum product transmission pipeline easement or thirty-five (35) feet from the pipeline whichever is greater, (k) The subdivider shall provide horizontal control for the f'mal check and record plat tied into the Virginia Coordinate System. south zone, Boundary tiedown will be accomplished by X and Y coordinate values being designated for at least two points (1) Copies of any restrictive covenants required as a condition of zoning shall be filed with the director of planning and county attorneys' office for a review to determine consistency with thc, conditions of zoning. The required restrictive covenants shall be recorded in conjunction with thc record plat. Subsequent changes to restrictive covenants are not subject to review or approval by the County. (m) Copies of all required articles of incorporation for homeowners associations shall be filed with the director of planning and the county attorney's office for review and approval prior to recordation of any section, When SWM/BMP facilities are to be maintained by a homeowners association, the articles of incom_ oration must also be submitted to the director of environmental engineering for review and approval. When there are private streets, alleys or sidewalks to be maintained by a homeowners association, the articles of incorporation must also be submitted to the director of transportation for review and approval (n) Final check and record plats for subdivisions adjacent to or including existing and proposed residential collector, collector and/or arterial streets shall show the proposed right of way location. (o) Every_ residential lot. except those lots in a subdivision for townhouses, shall front on a local street except as may be provided for in section 17-77, (p) Prior to plat recordation of any residential subdivision that includes streets, sidewalks wastewater, water, stormwater improvements and/or other improvements, the subdivider shall 55 provide the county with a surety bond in the amount equal to the construction COSt of all unimplemented !mprovements and 10% of the construction costs of all satisfactorily implemented improvements, with a minimum bond amount of not less than 10% of the total project costs. prior to submittal of the bond for approval, an itemized cost estimate for streets, sidewalks. wastewater, water, stormwater and other improvements establishing the required bond amount shall be submitted to. reviewed and approved by the director of environmental engineering and coun~ attorney's office. (q) Prior to plat recordation of any townhouse subdivisions that includes streets, private acccssway$ and parking areas, sidewalks, wastewater, water, stormwater improvements and/or other improvements the subdivider, shall provide the county with a surety, bond in the amount equal to the construction cost of all unimplemented irnprovement$ and 10% of the construction COSTS of all satisfactorily implemented improvements, with a minimum bond amount of not less than 10% of thc total project costs. Prior to submittal of the bond for approval, an itemized cost estim.ate for streets and other paving, sidewalks, wastewater, water, stormwater improvements. and other improvements establishing the rea_aired bond amount shall be submitted to. reviewed and approved by the director of environmental engineering and county attorney's office. (r) Prior to board of supervisors adoption of a resolution to accept the streets into the state system. the COnstruction of all improvements shall be acceptable to the directors of environmental engineering and utilities. (S) The subdivider shall place the following note on the final check and record plats and enforce the restriction through covenants: "No structure embellishments will be allowed on right of way without the commitment of. or issuance of a VDOT land use permit. Within the ten (10) foot clear zone ( measured from the edge of the street pavement out ten (10) feet ). no structural . embellishment will be permitted that is closer than two (2) feet from the edge of pavement of the street or higher than six (6) inches above the surface of the drive." ~.~ I I '[I,J, lllllll (I T [III[JIII3'-II. IC:I.IIIII I;;tlo 56 (2) Fo 093 U~IU~UI IXU~U LU Ig~ ~UIIIt UI IlAL¢ID~tlUII ~ltll Ll1~ ~tSlll UUUIIU~I~ 1111~ UI I ~l~l 79 lfl& ~:~-v~,~-o:-~ _~ ....... ~: ..... :.~ ~,~ ~ ..... ~___,_..~ .......... ~: ....... ~ ........... ~ _, ....~ U¢L~UUII UII~DL~III~IU ~llL~ ailU I ~11~11 ~llt~ LU ltd ~it UI lllt~i~tl~ll ~IUI ~1~ ~llL~l 1~1~ 094 ~J l-iil~ ~UUUI¥1~IUII ~i~iILk, LI L~,,IIiI1Li¥U ~tppIUVill pliUl LU J~ilUai~ ~1~ l]OO~ ~llall U~ UiUIIipL ILUIII Lli~ I~II~III~IIL~ UI ~UU~LIUII~ ~J~ ~UJ~ ~ilU ~lJ~lJ~ ~J ~IIU ~JJ UI UII~ ~LIUII UIUU~ L~II~LIV~ Sec. 1%6]. (a) No l~d shall be subdivided uffiess it co~lies with ~ticle III, division 3 of chapter 19 and · e Envko~enml Eng~eer~g Reference Manual as dete~ined by ~e director of cnvironmen~l engineering. Cross reference(s)--Floodplain districts. ~ 19-55 et seq, State law reference(s). Code of Virgi~a, ~ 15.2-2241(3). 59 Sec. 17-64. Preservation of natural features and historic resources. Trees. streams and natural riparian corridors which would add value to developments or tO the county_ as a whole, shall be protected whenever practicable in the design of the subdivision. Historic sites, features and similar amenities and assets, including identified visual resource~ adopted as part of the county's comprehensive plan shall be identified on all plats and be protected as provided for in County Code section 19-508, No filling within the natural features shall be permitted to circumvent any applicable part of the Code J,.J. Sec. 17-65. Property markers / Geodetic Monument~ Property_ markers shall be installed in all subdivisions at all lot comers, angle points, radial points .of curves in streets, and at all intermediate points along streets or property lines where property. markers cannot readily be seen one from the 9ther. The replacement of any geodetic control monuments, including but not limited tO National Oceananic and Atmospheric Administration/National Geodetic Survey (NOAA/NGS). United States Geological Survey (USGS). and county control monuments, removed or destroyed during the development of the subdivision shall be the responsibility of the subdivider, State law reference(s). Code of Virginia § 15,2-2241 (7), 6O t')'._)6 Sec. 17-66. Stormwater Drainage, (a) All proposed stormwater drainage systems shall be separate and independent from any wastewater system, Stormwater facilities including but not limited tO underground pipes, culverts, inlets, catchbasins, open ditches, stormwater management basin/ponds, and BMP's, as determined by the director of environmental engineering shall provide for the adequate discharge of surface water via gravity, flow into adequate natural drainage courses and shall be installed according to construction plans approved by the director of environmental engineering, (b) All stormwater drainage facilities installed in the subdivision shall be sized and installed to accommodate the runoff from the contributing watershed based on ultimate development as determined by the comprehensive plan. (c) All facilities shall conform to the design requirements of the Environmental Engineering Reference Manual, State law reference(s). Code of Virginia. 815.2-2241 ,(4) Sec. 1%67. Streetlighting, (a) Streetlighting shall be provided and installed in residential and residential townhouse district:; and commercial districts with residential development at certain intersections and along arterial or collector streets for safe .ty. Lighting shall be installed in accordance with the street light policy approved by the board of supervisors and administered by the environmental engineerinL, department through the construction plan/fin.al check plat review process. (b) All installation costs of streetlighting shall be the responsibility of the subdivider. The subdivider sha.!! provide full payment to the county of all installation charges estimated by thc, utili _ty company as well as administrative costs to the county. 61 Reference -- Board of Supervisors Street Light Policy State law reference(s). Code of Virginia. _~ 15.2-2241(5) See. 17-68. Easements, Easements for public use shall be provided tO the County to include but not limited to; (a) Easements sixteen (16) feet in width for proposed or possible water, wastewater and drainage improvements. (b) Easements eight (8) feet in width shall be provided along the rear of the lot. (c) Easements of eight (8) feet in width along the side lot lines where the side property_ line is the rear of another lot, (d) Easements of variable width may be required for Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) slope, drainage, and sight distance easements identified o, construction plans. (e) The County may require specific easements to address conditions of zoning, tentatiw: plat and construction plan approval. (O Easements of greater width may be reoyired by the director of environmental engineering for drainage purpOses or by the director of utilities for utility_ purposes. State law reference(s). Code of Virginia. ~ 15,2-2241( 3.6 ) 62 IUIlll }~l~tL (t~lU¥(tl U~ IUIIU~IIIII~ LU tll~ UU(IIU UI ~U~gl Yl~l~ ~ ~¢1t111¢~ ~lJ~9 ¢~11 ~iu~ j ~lg~ ~U~IL~ j ~U~ Will Ub ~IUY~U U~ Uik kU~IIL~ LU ~UaL~IL~ UI~ H~II~LLUIi allU ~UIII~Z~LZUII UI ~U~IL ...... ' county -- ~ pIUU~ U~ Ull~ IIIULIIUUj UIU ~UUUIVlUUI ~il~ll ~t ~ LUllS) ~uuj~c t~ LILU appIUVal ul LII~ ~ilL9 U~ U~¢IIIII~ ~UU~ U~¢IIUI~ p~l IU~J. aL UI¢ UIIU UI LIIdL p~llUU Ul¢ a~¢llt ~llall a~ 11~¢¢~a~ ~UMIYI~I/M~Y~I~i Will II~Y~ ~ IIIGAUIIUIII UI LWU ~al~ ~U CUIIIpI¢~U ail UIIpIUYUIII~IILD ~IIU tll~ IUIIU~UI~ CUIIUItlUII~ ~11~11 ~Fply. 63 ('),(_)9 · ., o, §'°~o. 1-32) Sec. 17-69. Street and subdivision names and street (a) Street and subdivision names shall not duplicate the name of an existing or tentatively approved street, site. or subdivision, The naming of strecB within a subdivision may, tO a limited extent, duplicate the subdivision name. Streets that are continuations of other streets shall bear the name of the existing street. The naming of proposed streets shall comply with the County Street Naming and Building Numbering Ordinance. Chapter 16, and approved by the director of environmental engineering and the appropriate regional planning district commission. (_b) The subdivider shall fund the fabrication and installation of street signs showing the names of streets at intersections in the subdivision in accordance with section 16-14 of the Code. (c) If the subdivider elects to install custom street signs, they shall conform to desie,, specifications approved by the director of environmental engineering and VDOT at the time construction plan approval, Installation of custom street signs by the subdivider does not reliew: them from the financial responsibilities of funding in (b) above. (d) All street signs shall be made of a material and located to be clearly visible by day and by night. ...... , --, ...... 'L p _t._,, t. .... :._t.,_. : ......... J ~uV .L .... i_..~:_.:~__ 2_._ L: .... ~_..~:_.:_:___ ___! lO0 64 v.-.,.-,-,-. -:,,o, § Ig.1-33) Sec 17-70 Buffers and Special Setbacks. (a) For lots which have a tentative plat approved after ( INSERT DATE ), buffers shall be exclusive of easements which are generally parallel to the buffer, required setbacks and street cut and fill slopes, and shall be preserved in an undisturbed condition unless otherwise approved by the director of planning. Easements crossing buffers shall generally be at right angles or shall cross the buffer so as to have the least impact to the buffer. (b) Post construction vegetation within the buffer shall meet a standard of not less than one a~.d one half ( 1 ½ ) times the Perimeter Yard Landscaping "C" quantity requirements as defined in County. Code section 19-518 prorated for every_ twenty-five (25) feet of depth., If in,qufficient vegetation exists within the buffer as determined by the director of planning, the subdivider shall submit a landscape plan to the director of planning for review and approval prior to release of the final check plat review comments. The subdivider shall install the required plant material prior to recordation. If conditions do not exist for good plant survival as determined by the director of planning, surety shall be provided to the county in the amount sufficient to guarantee the installation approved by the director of planning and in a form as indicated in section 17-73 (a)_ The planning department shall hold an.v required surety, Any such installation shall be cornpleted prior to state acceptance of the subdivision's streets. (c) Buffers of the following minimum width shall be provided adjacent to existing and proposed streets with the following classifications: (1) Arterial streets - fifty. (50) feet. (2) Collector streets - thirty-five feet (35), (3) Residential collector streets - thirty. (30) feet. (4) Local streets to negate double frontage condition - twenty (20) feet. (d) Adjacent to limited access streets, a setback distance of two hundred (200) feet, exclusive of required yards, shall be provided from the limited access street right of way, unless a noise study demonstrates that a lesser distance is acceptable as approved by the director of transportation. Natural vegetation shall be retained within the setback area unless removal is required to install noise attenuation measures or is approved by the planning commission. (e). Setbacks from temporary turnarounds easements shall conform to permanent cul-de-sac right of way standards, 65 I01 (13 A minimum setback for all structures of twenty (20) feet shall be provided from any petroleum product transmission pipeline easement or thirty-five (35) feet from the pipeline whichever is greater. State law reference(s). Code of Virginia. _~, 15.2-2279 l~LllI, J. Ii) ~L.,IX~.,,IO.L~vU I.).y Llilv until 66 Sec. 17-71. Designation of land for public use. (a) All subdivisions shall comply with the conditions of zoning requiring dedication or reservation of land for possible acquisition for public uses including but not limited to: parks, schools. libraries, fire stations, etc, (b) Tentative plats shall accommodate planned public uses as required by conditions of zoning. Whenever a tract includes a proposed site for such use, it shall be suitably incorporated by the subdivider into the plat after the planning commission or director of planning determines whether such property, is needed by the county, (c) The planning commission or director of planning, based upon conditions of zoning, shall verify_ whether the land is to be: 1. dedicated to the County by the subdivider, or; 2. made available for acquisition by the County, (d) The planning commission or director of planning shall verify, that the land is; 1. required for the proposed public use, and; 2. suitable for the proposed public use. If the planning commission or director of Planning determines that the land is not required, the director shall advise the ~ubdivider of said determination and. if allowed by conditions of zoning, shall advise the subdivider as tO the ability_ to rearrange lots in the proposed subdivision to incorporate the land, If the planning commission or director of planning determines that the land is not suitable for the proposed use. the planning commi.qsion or director may refuse to approve such dedication or configuration and require the rearrangement of lots in the proposed subdivision, (e) After the planning commission or director of planning verifies that the land is: 1. required to be dedicated and appropriate for the proposed public use. the subdivider shall be informed of this finding, and shall proceed with the tentative plat approval process, When the plat is recorded, such recordation shall constitute acceptance of the land for the designated public purpose, 2. required to be made available for acquisition, and appropriate for the proposed public., use. the subdivider shall be informed of this finding. The director of planning may also propose alternate areas on the subject parcel for acquisition. The director of planning and the appropriate county officer or other public entity involved in the acquisition or use of each such site shall seek a commitment tO purchase such site by the board of supervisors and shall include an estimate of the time required to cornplete the acquisition, The plannin~ commission or director of planning shall not approve the tentative plat for a minimum of thirty (30) calendar days to allow the board of supervisors to act. (a) If the planning commission or director of planning receives an affirmative 67 action, the subdivider shall designate on the tentative plats that area proposed to be acquired by the board of supervisors, (b) If the planning commission or director of planning receives a negative reply, the subdivider shall be advised to incorporate the area as lots on the tentative plat. 31J.~.ll [./IUIJU3~.I3 ~.UiiiI~JiJ I/ItlLII LII~ I~.~[LglIJ. I~IUII3 UI tIl~ ~JUlIL,y IIVUUlJI~I. III IIIO~IIO~III~IIL I. Jl~gllllJ&l~,.~. Sec. 17-72. Improvements--Required. (a) Unless the director of transportation can determine required mitigating street improvements, a traffic impact analysis based upon transportation department standards shall be submi_tted to. and approved by. the director of transportation if; (1) The proposed development is expected to generate 10.000 average daily trips (ADT) or more. based on trip generation rates a~ defined by the Institute of Transportation Engineers' publication. "Trip Generation, "as amended. (2) The director of transportation requests the analysis because the proposed development is expected to significantly impact the transportation network (b) The director of transportation shall determine the transportation improvements necessary_ to accommodate a proposed subdivision and to provide a safe and efficient access in accordance with (1) The thoroughfare plan or other existing or planned transportation improvements (2) Maintenance of a minimum D level of service based upon a twenty (20) year traffic demand projection, as provided by the director of transportation, or in areas designated by the director of transportation, no level of service below that which currently exists. (c) The subdivider shall be responsible for provision of transportation improvements, the need foi which is generated by the development, as determined by the director of transportation, (d) The director of transportation shall be responsible for determining the functional classification of streets. (e) The director of transportation may require development restrictions to achieve acceptabh: 68 levels of service, as outlined in this subsection. (f) The subdivider shall at his expense satisfactorily construct or provide any street, curb, g-utter. sidewalk, surface drainage, stormwater facility., wastewater system, waterline, as part of a public system and other improvements dedicated to the public use. and maintained by the county, the commonwealth, or other public agency, and for the provision of other site improvements for vehicular ingress and egress, including traffic signalization and control, for streets, for structures necessary_ to ensure stability of critical slopes, and for stormwater management facilities and for items associated with the construction of said improvements as indicated on the approved construction plans and as determined to be necessary in the field by the county based upon site conditions. The sale of the lot(s) does not absolve the subdivider from this responsibility prior to state acceptance of streets and for a period of one (1) year after the streets are taken into the state system, (g) The subdivider shall at his expense satisfactorily construct or provide a. ny private street, alley accessway, curb. gutter, sidewalk, surface drainage, stormwater facility, wastewater system waterline, as part of a private system and other improvements dedicated for the use by home owners of the subdivision, and owned and maintained by the homeowners association or individu.al lot owners, and for the provision of other site related improvements for vehicular ingress and egress., including traffic signalization and control, for accessways, or streets, for structures necessary to ensure stability of critical slopes, and for storm water management facilities and items associated with the construction of said elements as indicated on the approved construction plans and as determined to be necessary, in the field by the county based ut>on site conditions. The sale of the lot(s) does not absolve the subdivider from this responsibility for a period of one (1) year from the date of issuance of the last certificate of occupancy permit. (h) The subdivider of land shall pay or provide for the payment of his pro rata share of the cost of providing reasonable and necessary_ wastewater, water and stormwater facilities, located outside the property limits of the land owned or controlled by him but necessitated or required, at least in part. by the construction or improvement of the subdivision: however., no such payment shall be required until such time as the board of supervisors establishes a general wastewater; water, and drainage improvement program for an area having related and common wastewater, water; and drainage conditions and within which the land owned or controlled by the subdivider is located or the board of supervisors has committed itself by ordinance to the establishment of such a program. Said pro rata share shall be limited to the proportionate share of total estimated cost of ultimate wastewater, water and stormwater facilities based upon demand or projected flows required to adequately serve a related and common area. when and if fully developed in accord with the adopted cornprehensive plan. that shall be borne by each subdivider within the area. Such share shall be limited to the proportion of such total estimated cost which the increased sewage flow or increased volume of stormwater runoff to be actually caused by the subdivision bears to total estimated volume and of such sewage or runoff from such area in its fully developed state. In calculating the volume and velocity of stormwater runoff, the county shall take into account the effect of all onsite stormwater facilities (SWMs) or best management practices (BMPs) constructed or required to be constructed by the subdivider and give appropriate credit therefor 69 (i) Each such payment received shall be expended only for necessary engineering and related studies and the construction of those facilities identified in the established wastewater, water and stormwater program: however, in lieu of such payment the board of supervisors may accept the posting of a personal, corporate or property bond. cash escrow or other method of performance guarantee satisfactory, to the board conditioned on payment at commencement of such studies or construction, The payments received shall be kept in a separate account for each of the individual improvement programs until such time as they are expended for the improvement program. All bonds, payments, cash escrows or other performance guarantees hereunder shall be released and used. with any interest earned, as a tax credit on the real estate taxes on the property if construction of the facilities identified in the established water, sewer and stormwater programs is not commenced within twelve (12) years from the date of the posting of the bond. payment.. cash escrow or other performance guarantee. (j) Any funds collected for pro rata programs under this section prior to July 1. 1990. shall continue to be held in separate, interest bearing accounts for the project(s) for which the funds were collected and any interest from such accounts shall continue to accrue to the benefit of the subdivider until such time as the project(s) are completed or until such time as a general water wastewater and stormwater improvement program is established to replace a prior wastewater and drainage improvement program. If such a general improvement program is established, the board of supervisors may abolish an.v remaining separate accounts and require the transfer Of the assets therein into a separate fund for the support of each of the established wastewater, water, and stormwater programs. Upon the transfer of such assets, subdividers who had met the terms of any existing agreements made under a previous pro rata program sba, Il receive any outstanding interest which has accrued up to the date of transfer: and such subdividers shall be released from any further obligation under those existing agreements. All bonds, payments, cash escrows or other performance guarantees hereunder shall be released and used. with any interest earned, as a tax credit on the real estate taxes on the property if construction of the facilities identified in the established water, wastewater and stormwater programs is not commenced within twelve years from the date of the posting of the bond. payment, cash escrow or other performance guarantee. (k) Connection to the county water supply system shall be required in any of the following circumstances except as may be waived by the planning commission per County Code section 18- 63: (1) When any lot in the subdivision has an area of less than forty, thousand (40.000) square feet. or; (2) When an_v parcel recorded after ( INSERT DATE ) has an area less than one (1) acre, Parcels created prior to this date are subject to requirements in place at the time of their recordation, and (3) When an existing water line is less than two hundred (200) feet from an_v property_ linc of the lot for which a building permit application has been made for a new structure, or; (4) When a lot is located within the Southern and Western Plan area unless residential 70 zoning was obtained for such subdivision prior to June 23, 1993. or: (5) When a lot is located within the Route 288 Corridor Plan area unless residential zoning was obtained for such subdivision prior to May 25, 1999, (1) The subdivider shall provide payment to the director of the utility department based upon an approved engineers's estimate sufficient to cover the cost of water line installation in conjunction with the submission of the final check plat for any subdivision within two (2) miles of an existing water line if the existing water line has sufficient hydraulic capacity, to provide the required quality, and quantity to serve the proposed development, or within two (2) miles of a subdivision that wilt use public water, when the lot size in the proposed subdivision is greater than one acre but less than five (5) acres. The distance to the nearest water line shall be determined by using the most reasonable route, as determined by the director of the utilities department. The payment made under this subsection shall be used solely for the installation of water lines within the proposed subdivision. Until such time as the water lines are extended to the proposed subdivision and installed within the subdivision, the subdivider shall comply with requirements of section 17-77 (m) Individual wells may be used to provide water for domestic consumption subject to the following conditions; (1) All lots in the subdivision shall have an area of more than forty thousand (40,000) square feet. be located more than two (2) miles from an existing water line and are not subject to the mandatory connection requirements in section 17-72 (k) (4 and 5); and (2) A hydrologic study shall be submitted by the subdivider to the health department for review and comment which provides a scientific determination that there is an adequate quality and quantity of potable water in the underlying aquifer under both "normal" and "drought" conditions for the area under consideration; and (3) Prior to issuance of a building permit, the well shall be installed on the lot and the well water shall be tested and approved by the health department; and (4) The Chesterfield local health department shall enforce this and other applicable secti0m of the Code relating to well construction and well permitting requirements of the Commonwealth, (nj Connection to the county wastewater supply system shall be required in any of the followin~ circumstances except as may be waived by the planning ¢0mmissi0n per County. Code section 18 64; (1) When any subdivision recorded after (INSERT DATE ) has an average lot area of less than forty_ thousand ( 40.000 ) square feet. or less than ninety (90) percent of the lots have an area of forty thousand (40.000) square feet. or any 10t has an area of thirty. thousand (30.000) square feet. 71 (2) When any parcel recorded after (INSERT DATE) has an area less than one (1) acre. Parcels created prior to this date are subject to requirements in place at the time of their recordation. (3) When an existing wastewater line is less than two hundred (200) feet from an.v property. line of the lot or parcel for which a building permit application has been made for a new structure. (4) When the lot is located within the Southern and Western Plan area unless residential zoning was obtained prior to June 23. 1993. (5) When the lot is located within the Route 288 Corridor Plan area adopted unless residential zoning was obtained prior to May 25. 1999. (o) Any subdivision granted tentative approval prior to January 27. 1988. shall be exempt from the requirements of subsections (k). (1). (m). and (n)(1). (2) and (3) of this section unless tentative approval has expired. State law reference(s). Code of Virginia. ~ 15.2-2241(5). 2243, Sec. 17-73. Installation of improvements and bondin_~. (a) Prior to record plat approval, after all other required approvals are obtained, all improvements shown on the approved construction plans shall be completed to the satisfaction of the directors of environmental engineering and utilities, at the expense of the subdivider. In lieu of actual completion of the required improvements, the subdivider may record a plat by furnishing tO the director of environmental engineering surety in the form at>proved by the county attorney's office (1) a certified check; (2) cash escrow; (3) a surety bond: or (4) a bank's letter of credit. 72 The amount of the surety, shall be sufficient to cover the costs and guarantee the installation and cornpletion of all required improvements. The surety amount shall be approved bv the director of environmental engineering based upon unit prices for new construction in the county_. The surety may also include a reasonable allowance for estimated administrative costs, inflation and potential damage to existing streets or utilities which shall not exceed twenty-five (25) percent of the estimated construction costs. If the subdivider proceeds by this method, the subdivider shall install and cornplete the required improvements to the satisfaction of the director of environmental engineering subject to the following conditions: (1) The streets shall be accepted into the state system not more than two (2) years after the date of plat recordation. (2) No more than fifty (50) percent of the building permits in any recorded section of a residential or residential townhouse subdivision shall be issued until the paving requirements in that section have been completed, (3) No more than eighty (80) percent of the building permits in any section of a residential or residential townhouse subdivision shall be issued until the streets have been constructed to state standards and accepted into the state system as applicable. (4) An extension may be approved by the director of environmental engineering to condition three (3) directly above. (b) Surety reductions, as approved by the director of environmental engineering may be made in a cumulative amount of not more than ninety (90) percent of the total cost of satisfactorily cornpleted required improvements, Surety reductions based upon the percentage of improvements completed may not occur before the completion of at least thirty. (30) percent of the improvements The dkector of environmental engineering shall not execute more than three (3) surety reductions in any twelve (12) month period per bonded subdivision section, Upon final cornpletion and acceptance of said improvements in residential or residential townllouse subdivisions with streets, the release of any remaining surety shall be subject to the requirements of section 17-74. For the purpose of final release, the term "acceptance" shall be defined as the date of the meeting of the county's board of supervisors ( board ) at which the board is formally advised of the street acceptance by VDOT and assignment of the state route number(s), Upon final completion and acceptance of said improvements in residential townhouse subdivisions the release of any remaining surety shall be subject to requirements of section 17-74. For the purpose of final release the term "acceptance" shall be the date of the written notice to the subdivider of the completion of the required improvements to the satisfaction of the director of environmental engineering, State law reference(s), Code of Virginia. t 15,2-2241(5), 73 Sec. 17-74. Maintenance and bonding. (a) The subdivider shall be required to maintain and assume liability for the construction and maintenance of all required improvements per section 17-73, This includes but is not limited to snow removal on streets and sidewalks until acceptance of said improvements by the county, state or third party approved by the director of planning. (b) The subdivider shall be requked to provide surety in an amount of ten (10) percent of the cost of the required improvements as approved by the director of environmental engineering, in a form as outlined in section 17-73 to assure the satisfactory, maintenance of the required improvements for a period of one (1) year after the date of their acceptance in accordance with section 17-73. State law reference(s). Code of Virginia, § 15.2-2241 (5) 74 ~.,.~,.,,.,~ .~o, § Ig.1-38) DIVISION 2. STREET STANDARDS Sec. 17-75. General, The purpose and intent of this section is to regulate residential and residential townhous¢ development in order to maintain or improve the level of service of streets: to minimize the number of access points to streets: to promote the ability of travel between subdivisions; to ensure that the existing and proposed transportation facilities are adequate to accommodate the traffic generated by the proposed development: to ensure that appropriate traffic mitigation measures are provided: to provide appropriate pedestrian circulation networks among residential. residential townhouse, commercial, and recreational areas and public facilities: and to enhance safe _ty and convenience for the public. Loop. eyebrow loop. residential collector, cul-de-sac and local streets within a subdivision shall at a minimum, comply with the following VDOT road standards: Subdivision Street Requkements (SSR% 24 VAC 30-9-10 as amended and the VDOT Pavement Design Guidelines for Secondary Roads as applicable unless otherwise specified herein. All limited access, arterial ( principle and minor ) and collector streets shall comply with the VDOT Road Design Manual for urban streets. State law reference(s). Code of Virginia..~ 15.2-2241.(2) Sec. 17-76, Arrangement, (a) Streets shall be designed to ensure proper integration and coordination with other existing recorded or planned streets within and contiguous tO the subdivision. Subdivision layouts ~hall be arranged to maintain proper relationship to topographical conditions and natural terrain features such as streams and existing vegetation. Streets shall be designed to facilitate public convenience 75 iii and safety, including adequate access for emergency services equipment. Local streets within residential and residential townhouse developments shall not be used as access to commercial or industrial uses as indicated in chapter 19, The director of transportation shall consult the comprehensive plan when reviewing a proposed street layout, (b) All streets shall be designed and constructed in accordance with this chapter, the current standards and specifications of the Virginia Department of Transportation. or County. standards, whichever are more stringent, (c) Residential collector streets shall be arranged to; (1) facilitate conformance to the Planning Commission Stub Road Policy, (2) facilitate traffic circulation from one subdivision to another on non-thoroughfare streets, and (3) require the minimum number of street intersections with arterial and collector streets necessary to provide convenient and safe access to property.. (d) Local streets shall be arranged to: (1) conform to the Planning Commission Stub Road Policy, (2) discourage speeding and cut through traffiC, (3) permit effective stormwater drainage and efficient utility systems, (4) require the minimum number of street intersections with arterial and collector streets necessary to provide safe access to property., and (.5) minimize irnpacts to topographic and environmental features (e) The use of residential collector streets, curvilinear streets, cul-de-sacs, or looped streets may be required in conventional subdivision design. (f) To facilitate orderly development, the necessary rights-of-way and easements for stub streets to provide adequate access to adjacent property (.not included in the tentative) shall be dedicated to the boundary_ lines of the tract to be subdivided, in locations that are compatible with future development of the ad_iacent tract. This requirement may be waived if, in the opinion of the directors of transportation and planning or the planning commission, such stub streets are not necessary, or desirable for the coordination of the layout of the subdivision with the existing street, s or the most advantageous future development of adjacent tracts, When the adjacent property, is developed, the subdivider of such property shall extend the streets and utility service tO connect with the adjacent existing subdivision unless such connections are waived by the planning commission or director of planning, after review by the directors of transportation and fire, or are in violation of zoning conditions or requirements of this chapter. (g) The necessary, rights-of-way and easements for stub streets to provide adequate access to th~: adjacent property, shall be dedicated at the time a subdivision is recorded, (h) Subdivisions shall adequately accommodate continuity of streets and shall provide for pr0pe~' extension to subsequent phases and development of adjacent property, as determined by th~, director of planning, the director of transportation and the chief of the fire department. 76 (1) A local street shall provide sole access to a cumulative total of no more than fifty (50) lots. (2) The first street into the subdivision shall be designed and constructed as a residential collector if: a. the number of lots shown on the tentative plat. accessible by only one street. connected to a suitable street with two (2) points of access, is in excess of fifty (50) lots but less than one-hundred (100) lots, or b. the connection to an adjacent Undeveloped parcel as required by section 17-76 (g) or existing stub is anticipated to generate traffic volumes in excess of the Planning Commission Stub Road Policy on any subdivision street, or c. the street is identified on the thoroughfare plan. The street design shall comply with the classification as identified on the plan. (3) A second street, providing access to all lots. shall be constructed prior tO, or in conjunction with. the recordation of the fifty-first (51S0 lot unleSS: (a) a residential collector, collector or arterial street, with only one way in and out.(ie, a dead end) is proposed to provide access to more than one hundred (100) lots. Residential collectors shall be shown tO the limit of the tentative and/or parcel line as applicable, Bonding shall not be required for any unbuilt section. (4) The director of transportation shall determine the maximum number of lots for which a residential collector, connected to two (2) suitable street(s) with two (2) points of access, may provide access, (5) Relief to these requirements may be granted by the planning commission or director a. existing severe topogr~hic, physical or exten-ating circumstances exist $0 tha,t there is no other practical mean~ of providing another access, and b. financial hardship is not the princ~al reason for the waiver. c. In addition, the planning commission may grant relief tO these requirements if the resultant traffic on a local street will exceed the Planning Commission's Stub Road Policy as determined by the director of transportation. (i) Subdividers of all parcels or lots Iocated at existing or proposed crossovers, and any break in the median of a divided street.- shall submit and receive approval of a plan which addresses access for the surrounding area from the director of transportation, prior to tentative subdivision 77 approval. The director of transportation may require the owner(s! of such parcels or lots to provide access to adjacent properties. (il Curb and gutter shall be required on all local streets in all subdivisions, where the average lot has less than one hundred (100! feet of street frontage. The calculation excludes those lots fronting on the radial terminus of a cul-de-sac. Curb and _m~tter installation may be waived, in whole or in part. by the director of planning or planning commission tO preserve the existing neighborhood local street drainage method. (k) The minimum pavement design for all local streets, residential collector streets, private streets. alleys and accessways in any subdivision shall have at a minimum two (2) inches of bituminous concrete including the surface course. (Il Design standards for arterial and collector streets shall be approved by the director of transportation, except no street shall have a design less than VDOT standards. State law reference(s!. Code of Virginia. ~ 15,2-2241,(2- 4) Sec. 17-77. Access to arterial or collector streets, (al The director of transportation shall approve direct access to arterial and collector streets from subdivisions that border on or contain an existing or proposed arterial or collector street, Each subdivision shall be limited to one (l! direct access unless an access plan is submitted to and approved by the director of transportation for more than one (1) access. (b) No lot shall access on an existing or proposed arterial, collector street or residential collector unless approved by the director of transportation, State law reference(s!. Code of Virginia..~ 15.2,2241, 78 iJ. 4 Sec. 17-78. Street right-of-way width. Right of way of all streets shall be determined by the director of transportation: except, that no street shall have a street right-of-way width less tha. nn VDOT standards or as identified on th,.; thoroughfare plan, State law reference(s), Code of Virginia. ~ 15.2-2241 o,:,~. 17 79 ' FI. Il LIIO'IUU-~IIItlIU3 3,1ta!t IJL~ IJIL/[j~.~iiJ I~,,dO. LL~U. LO' i:)lJL, l.~ilJ, I LIIJ. IIIL~ ~L, II'~II1LDI_3 3U.L, II C13 IIlLILI3LII[..3~ .[JaLLV*.~lll O'I ~..,AI3LIXXi~ dlt~J. _[,JIO'_IJ~,JDL.,%J. tO. ItU 79 !15 (k) "----' -- J [1] 111~,~ JllllJllllL{lll ,[.JCLVk,,III~LJ.L kl%~i)I~il LUX ail itYll~.13 ui o-o OiL ....... uua CO~CrCtC. m~: ...... :_:__ * .... any .... ~ '-" ....... ~ a~d Sec 17-79. Cul-de-sac streets. Cul-de-sac streets shall not provide access to more than fifty. (50) lots. Cul-de-sac streets with less than twenty-five (25) lots shall provide a minimum pavement radius of thirty.-five (35) feet. Cul de-sac streets with greater than twenty-five (25) lots shall urovide a minimum t)avement radius of forty.-five (45) feet, ' ' - - 8O Temporary turnarounds shall comply with the previous stated pavement radius standards, Temporal_ turnarounds within the limits of the tentative plat shall, at the direction of the director of environmental engineering, be constructed on easements beyond the limits of the record plat, On temporary turnaround.q not so constructed, building setbacks shall conform to dedicated cul-de sac standards. State law reference(s). Code of Virginia. ~ 15.2-2241 Sec 17-80. Street intersections (a) Street intersections along one side of an existing or proposed street shall align with any existing or proposed intersections on the opposite side of such street unless otherwise approved by the director of transportation and VDOT. Street jogs with centerline offsets of less than one; hundred and fifty (150) feet shall be prohibited. Where streets intersect arterial or collecto, streets, their alignment shall be continuous or separated by a distance between centerlines determined by the director of transportation. (b) Alley intersections with streets shall be constructed to VDOT entrance standards, (c) At any street intersection sight distance easements per VDOT standards may be required. (d) Adequate paved radii shall be provided at all imersections. Generally in convemional subdivision design the minimum corner radius shall be thirty-five (35) feet for local streets aml fifty. (50) feet for other streets. In nonconventional subdivisions, the minimum turning radii shall be approved by the fire chief, director of transportation and VDOT based upon a demonstrated ability to provide for adequate emergency vehicle access. 81 (e) Local streets shall intersect with residential collector streets or with the street that provides primary_ access to the subdivision at a point beyond the vehicle stacking area of the intersection of that street with an arterial or collector street. State law reference(s). Code of Virgini.a, § 15.2-2241 Sec. 17-81. Alley~, (a) Dead-end alleys are prohibited unless adequate turnaround facilities are provided at th,.: terminus, (b) Alleys are not required by the county, and therefore shall not be dedicated as rNht of way, They shall be shown as common area or in a form approved by the directors of r~l-annin~ and transportation and owned and maintained by a homeowners association as specified in section 19 560. State law reference(s). Code of Virginia. _~ 15.2-2241 82 //"~J- ln'"/O 0 10 I 44\ Sec. 17-82. Sidewalks. Subdividers shall provide sidewalks in accordance with the Planning Commission Residential Sidewalk Policy on all streets where they qualify_ for VDOT or county, maintenance, and any additional or other locations if required as a condition of zoning. Exceptions to the Planning Commission Residential Sidewalk Policy shall be at the discretion of the planning commission or directors of transportation and planning, Sidewalk requirements shall be determined through the tentative subdivision process unless otherwise determined by the county. The sidewalks shall be shown on the tentative plat and the overall conceptual plan. as applicable. Construction may be phased as approved by the county.. but as a minimum, shall be bonded and constructed with each section recorded through which the sidewalk passes, The subdivider shall construct all required sidewalks per the Residential Sidewalks Requirements and Procedures. Where sidewalks quali .fy for maintenance by VDOT or the County. they shall be designed and installed in accordance with VDOT subdivision street requirements, For all private sidewalks, the subdivider shall demonstrate a design and long term maintenance; responsibility in accordance with section 19-559 1 83 DIVISION 3. LOT AND PARCEL STANDARDS, Sec. 17-83. Minimum Requirements, (a) In general, the size. shave orientation, and soils of lots and parcels shall be appropriate for the location of the subdivision and for the .type of development. Lot dimensions shall conform to the requirements of chapter 19 or conditions of zoning approval. (b) Lots and parcels to be served by on site wastewater disposal systems shall comply with the rules of the health department and the provisions of section 17-84 and chapter 12 of this Code (c) If a subdivision borders on or contains an existing or proposed arterial or collector street, the director of transportation may require the subdivider to limit access to said street(s) requiring a local street design utilizing a series of cul-de-sacs and/or loop streets, The lots shall only be, entered from such a local street, and a buffer as required in section 17-70 shall be provided alone the lot lines adjacent to the arterial or collector street, (d) Where lots are permitted to front on an arterial, collector or residential collector street as provided for by section 17-77, the minimum building setback line shall be increased by an additional twenty-five (25) feet. except where a specified distance is approved by conditions of zoning. (e) Lots and parcels shall be laid out so as to enable positive drainage to be provided away from all buildings. Individual lot and parcel drainage shall be coordinated with the general star'water drainage pattern for the area. Drainage shall be designed so as to avoid concentration of stormwater discharging into inappropriate receiving areas within. 10tS, The director of environmental engineering may require the subdivider to depict the building envelope as established by a professional engineer on the final check and record plats. (f} Lots and lot lines shall comply with the following standards; (1) All lots shall be buildable lots with at least one building envelope, (2) Lots at right angles to each other shall be avoided where possible. (3) Double frontage lots are permitted only when one street frontage incorporates a buffer or where required to overcome specific disadvantages of topography, (4) Lots shall not contain peculiarly shaped elongations solely to provide. necessary, square footage of area which would be unusable for normal purposes. (5) Lots shall not contain isolated remanents separated from the major portion of the lot by a creek or drainageway which would be unusable for normal purposes unless located on the perimeter of the tract. (6) Comer lots shall be of sufficient width to provide the applicable front / comer yard setbacks, (7) Side lot lines shall be approximately at right angles or radial to street lines. (8) The building envelope shall be within county boundary_ lines and within a single zoning case boundary. 84 (~) Parcels and parcel lines shall comply with the following standards: (1) All parcels shall be buildable parcels with at least one building envelope (2) Parcels at right angles to each other shall be avoided. (3) Double frontage parcels shall be avoided, (4) Parcels shall not contain peculiarly shaped elongations solely to provide necessary_ square footage of area which would be unusable for normal purposes, (5) Parcels shall not contain isolated rernauents separated from the major portion of the lot by a creek or drainageway, (6) Corner parcels shall be of sufficient width to provide the applicable front / comer yard setbacks. (7) Side lot lines shall be ar)proximately at right angles or radial to street lines. (8) The building envelop shall be within county boundary lines and within a single zoning case boundary., if applicable, (h) Flag lots shall be designated during the review of the tentative plat. The director of planning may require the subdivider to establish the location and orientation of residences located on and abutting flag lots for determining lot size compliance. The narrowest portion of an_v flagpole. pipestem or other nomenclature for the narrow access portion of the lot shall be thirty_ (30) feet. This portion of the lot is not considered buildable, The lot area requirements shall be met in thc., buildable portion of the lot. Flag lots shall only be utilized to protect or limit impacts to environmental or historic resources. State law reference(s), Code of Virginia. _~ 15.2-2241. U,.-,~u~ x .~ / o ~ ~ x o. J. Sec. 17-84 Standards for lots and parcels served by on-site sewaee disposal systems (a) All subdivisions for which residential zoning was obtained prior to~ebruary. 23. 1989 utili×ino on-site sewage disposal systems shall comply with the bulk requirements in place at the time 0~ zoning and the requirements of section 17-84 (b) (5) to (7). Lots which were recorded aftel' January_ 1. 1991 and prior to ( INSERT DATE ) shall COlllply with section 17-84 (b) (1) tO (4). (b) All lot subdivisions for which residential zoning was obtained after February. 23. 1989 utilizing, on-site sewage disposal systems and have not been recorded shall comply with the following' (1) The average lot size shall be no less than forty_ thousand (40.000) square feet, 85 (2) At least ninety (90) percent of the lots shall be at least forty thousand (40.000) square feet in size, (3) The minimum lot size shall be thirty, thousand (30.000) square feet in size. (4) All lots shall have a minimum lot width of one hundred and twenty (120) feet measured at the building line, (5) At the time of submission of construction plans, the subdivider shall submit a report from a certified soil scientist or an authorized on site soil evaluator to the director of the health department certifying that all on site sewage disposal system sites on lots within the subdivision comply with the Board of Health and County ordinances which regulate on-site sewage disPosal systems. The Chesterfield local health d~artment shall enforce this subsection and other applicable sections of the Code as relating to onsite sewage disposal system requirements of the Commonwealth. The certified s0il scientist or authorized onsite soil evaluator shall provide a report for each proposed lot which at a minimum contains; a. information on borings for no less th.an three (3) holes in the proposed drainfield site if the profile is uniform, b. a descrction of the soil characteristics at the proposed system site, with soil profiles tO a minimum depth of five (5) feet for each of thc holes. c. an estimated percolation rate of the soils at the proposed drain field depth, d. the scaled location of the proposed sewage disposal system and drain field, the reserve site. and the proposed buildable footprint on the lot. e. a recommended installation depth of the proposed system, f. the slope of the proposed drain field area, g. depth to rock or impervious strata. h. depth to seasonal water table. i. maximum projected sewage flow for the proposed lot. If design restrictions are imposed on the lot. they shall appear on the final check and record plats. (6) The subdivider shall provide sufficient information regarding the location of the proposed onsite sewage disposal drain field sites for an agent of the County to field verify_ the findings of the certified soil scientist or onsite soil evaluator, The sites shall be well marked on the lot, At the request of the director of th~: health department, the certified soil scientist or the site soil evaluator shall accompany the agent of the County to the proposed primary, and secondary system sites and locate them. In con_Junction with submission of the constructio,, plans, the subdivider shall submit a home site planing layout prepared by thc, certified soil scientist for review and approval by the director of the health d~artment. Construction plans shall show all const~ction limits that are outside the limits of the right of way. The record plat will not be approved until the o, site review is completed, The director of the health department shall advise th~; director of environmental engineering when the record plat may be signed 86 1;,',2 (7) Disposal sites shall not encroach on or be encroached on by easements RPA's. buffers or construction limits of streets. (b) No subdivision of land within the Southern and Western Plan Area for which residential zoning is obtained after June 23. 1993 may utilize on-site wastewater disposal systems unless all lots in such subdivision are at least one acre in size and located in those areas designated in the. county's cornprehensive plan for single-family residential use in the lowest density category., (Areas colored tan on the Southern and Western Area Land Use Plan.) (c) No subdivision of land within the Route 288 Corridor Plan Area for which residential zoning is obtained after May 25. 1999 may utilize on-site wastewater disposal systems unless all lots in such subdivision are at least one acre in size and located in those areas designated in the county's comprehensive plan for single-family residential use in the lowest density category.. (Areas colored tan on the Route 288 Corridor Plan,) Cross reference(s)-Septic tanks and septic systems..~ 12-11 et seq, State law reference(s). Code of Virginia. ~ 15,2-2242 87 lO. id. IUD GL DtJ. k.,k.,t IIIL~,/~,~..,%.~LIUII~ i)ll~lll Ui.. ~,'J lk.-%~L IUIll./k~O.l ~LI%..4.-L~ CtlIU. J..~ ll%.~t..~L / §101 /IO) //'"l__J_ 1("1"'~0 e 10 I 4{-I\ 88 I, IlJ 111 ~.11t.~1111) tlll,~ ,~l/.~k.~ i311o~Iyt.~ llllId, tJIII,~IILO. LIUII fYI LULl, 3111:111 LU Lll%~ l~%~t~il%~lll~lit~ UI ~iiClp[~l 1] UI UilO [,U] lX[,,31UL~IILIIII_IULi~ LU UI~ D~'I Y~.~L.L u.,y ~.UIIY~.,IILIUIll/I l,./LJ. YCLtJ~v UI .I/I~J.IYIU. LICLI D%.~Vy~.,,J. CLi~.~ LIiD_I~LjD,.aI ~-,,o. uu,,,l,ty w,ui u,v tui¢~ ut uic aumt~ i,uaiu, uul.,at u.cl,[ alu u,u pro-v-i$iOl-~ut ~cuuul.' -/-~- &i~d U~ tm[!L-%~.u.iJ. Li.~ LU ~./IU¥1Ub IUI tllr~ Ull-i3tl~,~bt _lJO~llk. Ul~ ~J. llt.l IUIiIUUI~ lclt,~llltl%.~3 l%.~.ltJ. U~.~U IUI Lllb LJ~./L~ UI U31,~ O~ll~J. Ut,~¥t,~IU~.JIII~,~IIL %.~UllLtvllll. JllJ. LbU.~ (it3 ~.~3t~J. UIIDII%.~U 111%ell~J.~JL~.~l IJ UI LIII3 ~,.-~UUU. Iii] OiUl,~ IUL ~,,,C~ i)lillll Ub Ol. YpiU.6.11ii(21.1vlJIl[ill. ~llI[IL~3 Ui illUiO, l LU i~Li~.k.~L I).II~S. 89 That this ordinance shall be effective January 1, 2001. 90 ATYACHMENT 2 AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE CODE OF TI-IE COUNTY OF CHESTERFIEI.D, 1997, AS AMENDED BY AMENDING AND RE-ENACTING SECTION 19-69, 19-79, 19-89, 19-94, 19-99, 19-105, 19-551 RELATING TO REQUIREMENTS FOR SETBACKS AND FRONTING BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County: (1) That Section 19-69, 19-79, 19-89, 19-94, 19-99, 19-105, 19-551 of the Code of the Count_ of Cheste_ffiel~l, 199Z as amended, is amended and re-enacted to read as follows~' Sec. 19-69. Required conditions. The conditions specified in this section shall be met in the R-88 District. OOO (c) Front yard. Minimum of 75 feet ia depth. On lots located along cul-de-sacs, if the radius of the cul-de-sac is 40 feet or less, the building setback around the cul-de-sac shall be at least 30 feet. ~here When the radius of the cul-de-sac is more 'than 40 feet, the building setback ~ be les~,,,~.~----' .,,,,--' ~-~,,~ ..... ,~,,,,~ than 25 feet. Minimum setbacks shall be increased where necessary to obtain the required lot width at the front building line. Through the subdivision process, an additional setback of up to 25 feet may be added to the minimum setback, if the lot is located along an arterial or collector street. This additional setback requirement will be noted on the. 000 Sec. 19-79. Required conditions. The conditions specified in this section shall be met in the R-25 District. OOO (c) Front yard. Minimum of 50 feet ia depth ~idth. On lots located along cul-de-sacs, if the radius of the cul-de-sac is 40 feet or less, the building setback around the cul-de-sac shall be at least 30 feet. ~ When the radius of the cul-de-sac is more than 40 feet, the building setback shall not be less nc, cd rot be ni6rc than 25 feet. Minimum setbacks shall be increased where necessary to obtain the required lot width at the from building line. Through the subdivision process, an additional setback of up to 25 feet may be added to the minimum setback..if the lc I is located alone an arterial or collector street. This additional setback requirement will be noel on the record plat. OOO Sec. 19-89. Required conditions. The following .conditions specified in this section shall be met in the R-12 District: 000 (c) Front yard. Minimum of 35 feet in depth. On lots located along cul-de-sacs, if the radius of the cul-de-sac is 40 feet or less, the building setback around the cul-de-sac shall be at least 30 feet. W-here When the radius of the cul-de-sac is more than 40 feet, the building setback shall not be less ~,,,.~, ~,~L ~,,~ more than 25 feet. Minimum setbacks shall be increased where necessary to obtain the required lot width at the front building line. Through the subdivision process, an additional setback of up to 25 feet may be added to the minimum setback, if the lot is located along an arterial or collector street. This additional setback requirement will be noted on thc record plat, 000 Sec. 19-94. Required conditions. The conditions specified in this section shall be met in the R-9 District: 000 (c) Front yard. Minimum of 30 feet in depth. On lots located along cul-de-sacs, if the radius of the cul-de-sac is 40 feet or less, the building setback around the cul-de-sac shall be at least 30 feet. W-here When the radius of the cul-de-sac is more than 40 feet, the building setback shall not be less~,,.,.~,-A- ~ .,,L-~' '-~,,.~ more than 25 feet. Minimum setbacks shall be increased where necessary to obtain the required lot width at the front building line. Through the subdivision process, an additional setback of up to 25 feet may be added to the minimum setback, if the lot is located along an arterial or collector street. This additional setback requirement will be noted on the record plat, 000 Sec. 19-99. Required conditions. The conditions specified in this section shall be met in the R-7 District: 000 2 (c) Front yard. Minimum of 30 feet in depth. On lots located along cul-de-sacs, if the radius of the cul-de-sac is 40 feet or less, the building setback around the cul-de-sac shall be at least 30 feet. Where When the radius of the cul-de-sac is more than 40 feet, the building setback shall not be less~,,~,~----' not '~o~ ...... ~,,,,,~ than 25 feet. Minimum setbacks shall be increased where necessary to obtain the required lot width at the front building line. Through the subdivision process, an additional setback of up to 25 feet may be added tO the minimum setback, if the lot is located along an arterial or collector street. This additional setback requirement will be noted on the record plat. 000 Sec. 19-105. Required conditions. The purpose and goal of the following conditions is to create developmems that protect against overcrowding, undue density of population, obstruction of light and air and that are attractive, convenient and harmonious. To this end, buildings should be designed to impart harmonious proportions and to avoid monotonous facades or large bulky masses. Townhouse buildings should possess architectural variety but enhance an overall cohesive residential character. Character should be achieved through the creative use of design elements such as balconies and/or terraces, articulation of doors and windows, sculptural or textural relief of facades, architectural ornamentation, varied rooflines or other appurtenances such as lighting fixtures and/or planting. Townhouse rows of more than six units shall be clustered and employ sufficient variety of setbacks between units to avoid monotonous facades and bulky masses. The conditions specified in this section shall be met in the R-TH District, except as noted in section 19-106: OOO (1) Frontage on public street. All lots shall have frontage on a public street, or access thereto by common right-of-way within 500 feet. Townhouse 10ts not fronting on a public street shall front on paved accessways designed and constructed in accordance with VDOT paving specifications for Subdivisions and Secondary. Roads, OOO Sees. 19-551. Street frontage required--Residential (except for MH-1) and agricultural. (a) Unless otherwise specified and except for farm buildings, a lot outside a subdivision, as defined in section, 17-2 used in whole or in part for dwelling purposes, including permartem manufactured ~ homes, shall have abut--~ at least fifty (50) feet f~Xr..o_~gg~II upon a street. After (INSERT DATE). lots within a subdivision shall have street frontage of at least fifty. (50~ feet upon a local street or thirty at least 1~301 feet on a permanent reeorded cul-de-sac. Frontage of at least thirty. (30) feet may be permitted at the radial terminus of a loop street or on the flagpole portion of a flag lot, but all other lots shall have at least fifty_ (50) feet of frontage, Where lots are permitted to front on arterial, collector or residential collector ~treet the minimum frontage shall be at least fifty_ (50) feet and the number and location of driveways shall be approved by the director of transportation. Parcels as def'med in the Subdivision Ordinance shall have frontage as required by sectiOn 17-2, No lot or parcel abutting the terminus line of a public street shall be considered to have frontage unless it fronts for at least thirty_ (30) feet on a recorded cul-de-sac or the stub street is not anticipated to be extended is approved, through the tentative or minor subdivision plat review process, by the planning commission or the directors of the planning and transportation departments as frontage, A lot or parcel without street frontage may be used for temporary dwelling purposes with a manufactured or mobile home; however, in considering applications for ..... ~ ...... -' ..... '-:'~ home permits and special exceptions, in addition to other land use considerations, due regard shall be given to whether the lot or parcel has ~ at least fifty. ~50) feet ~ tlporrestr~. (b) Unless otherwise specified, no permit for erecting, moving or converting any building on a parcel outside a subdivision, as defined in section, 17-2 shall be issued unless the street adjoining the parcel where the building is to be erected, moved or converted is a part of the state highway system, primary or secondary. This provision shall not apply to farm buildings or other stmctures not designed for human habitation. (2) That this ordinance shall become effective immediately upon adoption. 4 4_..3O ATrAC'BMENT 3 AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE CODE OF THE COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD, 1997, AS AMENDED BY AMENDING AND RE-ENACTING SECTION 19-301 RELATING TO DEFINITIONS BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield Coanty: (1) That Section 19-301 of the Code of the Count. of Cheste~eld, 199Z a~ amended, is amended and re-enacted to read as follows: Sec. 19-301. Del'tuitions. For the purposes of this chapter, the following words and phrases shall have the following meanings' 000 Alley: A passage or way 6pca to ---'-':- -- ' ' v",",~ v. private ......' affording ...... " ....... ,~,~,~,,~,, .,~. ~,,~,~, ,--.,~ ,~,~,,,,,,,~,,. A public or private right-of-way primarily desi_aned to serve as access to the side or rear of those properties whose principal fron_tage is on a streeL Additionally. the alley may be used for drainage and utility_ easements and/or imnrovements 000 Best ]~mnagement L:~lxactices or BMPs: A practice, or a combination of practk~s, that is determined by a state or designated area-wide planning agency, or director of enVironmental ~ to be the most effective, practical means of preventing or reducing the amount of pollution generated by nonpoint-sources to a level compatible with water quality goals. ~ includes, but is not limited to.. detention or retention basins. · ~,, prop¢ abu,..;r.g ,,..,. adc ,~. ux m~x~F~,,,~ au~, 6~ ~C~ = ........ ~-- ~ ........ ~ ........... ~--~ --- ~.~,,j ~, ~,-.~v~-, ~, ~, ~.~ ,,~,~,, A set of adjacent lorn or p~cels bound~ by s~. or by a combination of s~eets ~d public p~. cemeteries, raikoad righ~mf-waY shorel~es of wate~ays, or bounda~ lines of ~e coun~. OOO Building: Any structure, including a pemvanem manufactured or-mobile home, having a roof supported by columns or walls built for the support, shelter or enclosure of persons, animals, chattels Or property of any kind. The word "building" does not include a tent, zcinporaiy inobile home or temporary manufactured home. The word "building" includes.the word "structure." 000 Building setback line. _front: A line within a lot or parcel so designated on a recorded plat or as otherwise established by the Code at the minimum front yard setback distance that defines the front building envelope limits and/or by the location where the lot or parcel achieves the minimum width requirement. If the required width is not met at the minimum front yard setback line. the location of the front building setback line is determined where the minimum required width between the side lines has generally equal angles created by the intersection of the setback line and each side line. The narrowest lot frontage shall always be the front yard. 000 Easement: A grant of rights by a property owner to another individual, group or governmental unit to make..,..[~,~':-:'A-' a specified use of a portion of real property "--~,,L a *w,--,~,~ v~.,v,~,~. 000 000 Frontage: The continuous length of the property line of a lot or parcel of land measured along a single street, against which the land abuts. Access easements do not constitute frontage. Stub streets do not constitute frontage except as permitted in section 19-551. 000 Lot: A single recorded partitioned land area set off by metes and bounds ~ occupied, or intended to be occupied, by a principal building or buildings and accessory buildings and uses, together with such open spaces as are required under this chapter having not less than the minimum area required by this chapter for a lot in the district in which it is situated and fronting on a street except as otherwise permitted in R-TH districts. For purposes of this Chapter only, a T-hemord "lot" includes a the-words "plot," "parcel or ,~,,~ "premises. 000 , comer: IUL ~tILiLLIlI~ ~JiI t~k; i)Ll~t~) ~IH~II UILUI~L aL ~il ~I[IU IIUL UI~I i JO U~IUU3. .... : ..... : .... ~"- ~ .... '-' ':-- -~"- =--" .... : ....... lot im ted the inte tio of ~0 2 streets that generally has an adjacent interior angle not greater than 135 degrees, 0OO Lot, through: A lot having a pair of opposite lot lines along two more or less parallel pubtie streets, and which is not a corner lot. On a "through lot"r Bhoth street lines shall be deemed front lot lines excluding lots that include a buffer along one street in a residential or residential townhouse district. In this situation, the land adjacent to the buffer shall be deemed the rear yard. Lot width: The horizontal distance between the side lines of a lot measured along the minimum front building yard setback line. 000 Planned development: One or more contiguous lots zoned under section 19-14 or one or more contiguous 10tS under single ownership or unified control, planned as a whole for development in a single or programmed series of phases operafiom, in accordance with an approved master plan which may include multiple land uses and as further outlined in section 17-9 and 19-14 as applicable. 000 public right-of-way wMch provides veMcular access to prope~ies, or provides for ~ough traffic, whether designated as an aaerial, collector, residential collector, highway, parkway, street, avenue, road. boulevard, lane. place, cul-de-sac, or a~v o~er public way. A street $hal! be deemed the total length and wid~ of ~e strip of land dedicated 0r designed for public travel, MchdMg such ~rovements reafiked to become pa~ of ~e Virg~a state ~amp0rmti0n system. Street. arterial: A street identified on the thoroughfare plan as a major arterial which provides major circulation movements and accommodates through travel, serves the major cer~ter(s) of activity_, has a high traffic volume, and typically accommodates long and moderate trip lengths, Arterials shall include, but not be limited to. major arterials having a right-of-way width of ninety. (90) feet or one hundred twenty (120) to two hundred (200) feet as determined by the director of transportation, 000 Street, collector: 133 II~.,,J.,?~IlU~JLIJ. UUU*:.)~ Ul~LIIU~UL~';3 Lll_~5 ILUJLII I..11~,, lllCiJUl/llllJ, l~Jl O. lt*~ll'"~l LIIIUU*~IJ. ~l. lJ. 0_1~.,0. LU Liln~JJ. ,.,.,,~,..,.u,.~ .,~ ~.u~,, u,~ ~,,., '.,'*'"IVI~II'..'~I"'-, ~',~ll. A street identified on the thoroughfare plan as a collector that collects traffic from local streets in commercial and industrial areas and neighborhoods and channels such traffic into the arterial systems and typically does not permit access to individual residential or residential townhouse lots. Collectors have a right-of-way width of sixty (60) to seventy (70) feet, as determined by the director of transportation. 000 Street. limited access: A street shown on the thoroughfare plan as a limited access street with fully controlled access that is intended to provide for safe and efficient movement of high volumes of traffic at relatively high speed. Fully controlled access means that the authority, to control access is exercised to give preference to through traffic and is the condition where the right of owners abutting land to access a street is fully or partially controlled by public authority, These streets shall include, but not be limited to. limited access streets with a right-of-way width of two hundred (200) feet. as determined by the director of transportation. The term "limited access street" shall include but not be limited to the words "limited access road(s)", "freeway" and "expressway". 000 Str local A ----' -"-:-'- --:----" ....... : _ 4: .............. ,. .... :__ ,__~ __4 eet, : lUaU WlII~.~II }/llllXallly p~lixlit, ull~w[ a~. [u aou-un~; iailu3 ailuconnccts to ~ A street of limited continuity, used primarily for access to abutting properties and serving local needs, 000 Wetlands' l ,urn a,lu uul~uua~ w~uauds. Areas that are inundated or saturated by surface or groundwater at a frequency and duration sufficient to support, and that under normal circumstances do support, a prevalence of vegetation _typically adapted for life in saturated soil conditions and over which the Commonwealth of Virginia or the U,S. Army Corps of Engineers exercises jurisdiction. Wetlands typically include swamps, marshes, bogs. and similar areas. 000 (2) That this ordinance shall become effective immediately upon adoption. 134 A rACHMENT 4 AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE CODE OF THE COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD, 1997, AS AMENDED BY ADDING SECTION 19-508.1 AND DELETING SECTION 19-571 RELATING TO UNDERGROUND UTILITIES BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of SUpervisors of Chesterfield County: (1) That Section 19-508.1 of the Code of the Count. of Cheste_rfield, 1997, as amended, is added to read as follows: Sec. 19-508.1 Utility lines under_m'ound. All utility_ lines such as electric, telephone. CATV or other similar lines shall be install~l underground. Where transmission lines traverse the property_ proposed for subdivision, the. subdivider shall not be required to place such line underground. This requirement shall apply tO lines serving individual office, commercial and industrial sites as well as to utility lines necessary In addition, all related e _qu~ment for electric, telephone. CATV or similar utilities mu.qt be loc~t.~ underground if placed in the front yard of a residential or residential townhouse lot, (2) That Section 19-571 of the Code of the CoUnt. qf Cheste_r[ield, 199Z as amended, is deleted as follows: (3) That this ordinance shall become effective immediately upon adoption. AI FAC 5 AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE CODE OF THE COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD, 1997, AS AMENDED BY AMENDING AND RE-ENACTING SECTION 19-518 RELATING TO STANDARDS FOR STREET TREES BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County: (1) That Section I9-518 of the COde of the CounU of Cheste_rfield. 1997, as amended, is amended and re-enacted to read as follows: Secs. 19-518. Plant material specifications. 000 .(la) Street Trees: During the subdivision process, required street trees shall be shown on a plan showing the proposed tree locations, species and caliper, and submitted to and approved by the clirector of planning and VDOT. The street tree plan shall be submitted as a part of the cgnstruction plans. (1) Unless otherwise re _maired. trees at a maximum spacing of forty_ (40) feet on center shall be located no greater than five (5) feet outside of the right of way in an easement granted to the homeowners association or within the right of way ff approved by VDOT. For single .trunk trees the minimum allowable caliper measured four (4) feet above trade shall be two and one half (2 1/2 ) inches. Multistem trees shall have a minimum of three canes and be a minimum of ten feet in height. Species selected for planting shall be suitable for ~owing in this vegetative zone and shall'be drought tolerant. The subdivider or developer shall at their expense install all required street trees i~lentified on the approved plans prior to recordation or sure _ty shall be provided in the amount approved by.the director of planning and in a form accepted by the county attorney's office, sufficient to ~arantee installation. Any surety_ shall be held by the director of planning. Installation within a subdivision shall be completed prior to state acceptance of the subdivision's streets. Required street trees shall be guaranteed by the installer .for a period of not less than one (D year. Replacement of dead trees is required in accordance with section 19-518(d). Maintenance responsibilities of the required street trees within a subdivision shall be specified on the final check plan and record plat to be the responsibility of the homeowners association. Street trees, shall not be removed during or after residences are constructed. Trees removed shall be replaced with a like species and in a size comparable to the original planting. (2) That this ordinance shall become effective immediately upon adoption. ATTACHMENT 6 AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE CODE OF THE COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD, 1997, AS AMENDED BY ADDING SECTION 19-559 RELATING TO REQUIREMENTS FOR HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATIONS BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County: (1) That Section 19-559 of the Code of the Count. of Cheste_rfield. 1997, as amended, is added to read as follows: Sec. 19-559. Required Homeowners Association. A homeowner's association shall be re_maired to be formed during the subdivision process when any of the following conditions are proposed: There is. to be commonly held pro~rty or open space: There are to be streets/alleys/vehicular/pedestrian access ways. and/or sidewalks that are not maintained by the county, or VDOT: and (3) There are to be SWM/BMP's located on commonly held property. (Hereinafter these items are referred to as commonly held property_,) In conjunction with the submission of the final check plat. the subdivider shall submit articles of incorporation, bylaws, and restrictive covenant,q (collectively bylaws) to the directOr of planning and the county, attorney's office for review and approval. ,An additional copy shall be submitted for review and approval by the director of environmental engineering if SWM/BMP's are located on commonly held pro_r~rty, ,An additional copy shall be submitted for review and approval by the director of tramport~tion if there are streets/alleys/vehicular/pedestrian access ways. and/or sidewalks that are not maintained by the county or VDOT and an additional copy shall be submitted for review and approval by the director of utilities for all townhouse and private road subdivision,q to address ownership and maintenance responsibilities for an.v privately owned utilities, The following elements shall be incom_orated into the bylaws associatiOn: of the homeowners' (1) the homeowners' association ~hall own and maintain all commonly held open spu_c~- and recreation facilities: the homeowners' association shall be responsible for and required to colleqt sufficient dues that at a minimum provide for; payment of taxes on commonly held property. (3) b~ fund repairs/maintemnce and replacement of facilities in common property.. a homeowners' association required by this section shall not have the ability, to dissolve its existence nor dispose of real property without prior written approval from the directors of planning, environmental engineering and transportation. (4) the maintenance responsibilities of the homeowners association of commonly held property containing a SWM and/or BMP shall be detailed in the restrictive covenants. (5) the maintenance responsibilities of the homeowners association of commonly held property containing streets/alleys/vehicular/pedestrian access ways. and/or sidew.a, lks that are not maintained by the county_ or VDOT shall be detailed in the restrictive covenants. The final check and record plats shall indicate the maintenance responsibili_ty of the homeowners' association. In conjunction with recordation, approved articles of incorporation shall be filed with the Virginia State Corporation commission and shall be recorded with the bylaws of the homeowners assgciation and the restrictive covenants with the clerk of the circuit c0ur~. Subdividers that are required to create homeowners association under this subsection shall fund the financial responsibilities of the homeowners association as identified in (c) above until such time as the operation of the association, as specified in the restrictive covenants, is controlled by the residents of the subdivision, (2) That this ordinance shall become effective immediately upon adoption. ATTACHMENT 7 AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE .C.O.,D_a~_T[~ COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD, 1997, AS AMENDED BY AMENDING AND RE-ENACTING SECTION 18-64 RELATING TO REQUIREMENTS FOR MANDATORY WASTEWATER . CONNECTION IN CERTAIN AREAS BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County: (1) That Section 18-64 of the Code of the County of Chesterfield, 1997, as mended, is amended and re-enacted to read as follows: Sec. 18-64. Mandatory wastewater connection in certain areas. (a) All structures which are located on property that is included in the Southern and Western Area Plan described in the subdivision ordinance and which received zoning approval after June 23, 1993 shall connect to the wastewater system. However, the following structures shall not be required to connect unless connection to the wastewater system is otherwise required by law: (1) Single-family dwellings on lots which are at least forty_ thousand (40.000) square feet one-ae~ in size and which are located in areas that are designated in the comprehensive plan for single-family residential use in the lowest density category (areas colored tan on the Southern and Western Area Land Use Plan); (2) Temporary manufactured or mobile homes; (3) Structures that were authorized by conditional uses .or special exceptions which were renewed after June 23, 1993; (4) Structures that are authorized by conditional uses or special, exceptions that were granted after June 23, 1993 if the use that is permitted by the conditional use or special exception is incidental to a principal use that was previously allowed with a septic system; (5) Governmental structures and institutional buildings; and (6) Residences that are located on lots that are exempt from the requirements of the subdivision ordinance. (b) All structures which are located on property that is included in the Route 288 Corridor Plan Area as shown in the comprehensive plan, and which received zoning approval after May 25, 1999 shall connect to the wastewater system. However, the following structures shall not be required to connect unless connection to the wastewater system is otherwise required by law: (1) Single-family dwellings on lots which are at least forty thousand (40.000) square (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) feet onc acrc in size and which are located in areas that are designated in the comprehensive plan for single-family residential use in the lowest density category (areas colored tan on the Route 288 Corridor Plan area) Temporary manufactured or mobile homes; Structures that were authorized by conditional uses or special exceptions which were renewed after May 25, 1999; Structures that are authorized by conditional uses or special exceptions that were granted after May 25, 1999 if the use that is permitted by the conditional use or special exception is incidental to a principal use that was previously allowed with a septic system; Governmental structures and institutional buildings; and Residences that are located on lots that are exempt from the requirements of the subdivision ordinance. 000 That this ordinance shall become effective immediately upon adoption. CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Meetin~l Date: January 10, 2001 Item Number: 8.C.l.b. Subject: Set a Public Hearing to Consider Amending Sections 9-143 and 9-174 of the County Code to change the Due Dates for the Remittance of Consumer Utility Tax and E911 Tax County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Set a public hearing for January 24, 2001 to consider amending Sections 9-143 and 9-174 of the County Code. Summary of Information: The County Code currently requires that all utility service providers remitting consumer utility taxes to the County submit those taxes no later than the 15th day of the month succeeding the collection of the taxes. The Code of Virqinia was recently amended to permit service providers to remit the taxes up to the last day of the month succeeding the collection of the taxes. Therefore, the County Code must be amended in order to avoid conflicting with state law. The Commissioner of Revenue has also requested that the deadline for the remittance of E911 tax also be changed from the 15th of the month to the last day of the month to be consistent with the new deadline for other utility taxes and for ease of administration. Staff recommends setting a public hearing for January 24, 2001 to consider this change. Preparer: Steven L. Micas Attachments: Yes ~-] No Title: County Attorney 0614(22):51706.1(51705.1) AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE CODE OF THE COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD, 1997, AS AMENDED BY AMENDING AND RE-ENACTING SECTIONS 9-143 and 9-174 RELATING TO BILLING, COLLECTION AND REMITTANCE OF CONSUMER UTILITY TAX AND E911 TAX BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County: That Sections 9-143 and 9-174 of the Code of the Coun~ o_f Chesterfield, 199 7, as amended, is amended and re-enacted to read as follows: Sec. 9-143. Collection and remittance by seller. Every telephone service seller shall collect the tax imposed at the time of collecting its service purchase price and shall pay the taxes collected during each calendar month to the treasurer on or before the last 15th day of the second calendar month thereafter, together with the name and address of any purchaser who has refused to pay the tax. The required report shall be in a form prescribed by the county administrator. Sec. 9-174. Billing, collection and remittance of tax. All service providers under this Article XII shall bill the applicable consumer tax to all users who are subject to the tax and shall remit the same to the commissioner of the revenue for the county on a monthly basis no later than the last 15th day of the succeeding month of collection. Such taxes shall be paid by the service provider to the commissioner of the revenue for the county in accordance with applicable state code ' ':~--:-:- "- j - ,~u~,= § ~o. ,-,.=,,, and remitted in a form approved by the commissioner of revenue. Any tax paid by the consumer to the service provider shall be deemed to be held in trust by such provider until remitted to the county. Failure of the service provider to remit consumer taxes on a timely basis shall subject the service provider to penalties and interest as provided in Section 9-6. (2) That this ordinance shall become effective immediately upon adoption. 0614:51705.1 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Meetin~ Date: January 10, 2001 Item Number: 8.C.2. Subject: Extend the Time for Planning Commission Recommendations for Zoning Ordinance Amendments Relative to Electronic Message Center Signs~ County Administrator's, Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Grant the Planning Commission an additional 100 days to make its recommendation on the Zoning Ordinance Amendments on Electronic Message Centers. Summary of Information: On April 26, 2000, the Board of Supervisors revised its policy relating to Electronic Message Center signs. In conjunction with the policy, the Board directed the Planning Commission to hold public hearings on companion Zoning Ordinance Amendments. Under the Code of Virginia, unless the Board grants additional time, the Planning Commission must make their recommendation at its January meeting or they are deemed to have recommended approval. The Planning Commission has scheduled a public hearing on this matter for February 20, 2001. The Commission is also considering other amendments to the portion of the Zoning Ordinance governing signs. Because it is most efficient to act on all of the amendments at one time, staff recommends that the Board grant the Commission this additional time to make a recommendation on the Zoning Ordinance amendment relative to electronic message centers. Thomas E. Jacobson Title: Director of Planning C: DATA/AGENDA/2000/JAN1001.2/GOK Attachments: Yes No CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page l of I Meeting Date: January 10, 2001 Item Number: 8.C. 3. Subject: State Road Acceptance County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Summary of Information: BERM~TDA: MATOACA: Green Vista at Rivers Bend, Section 1 Rivers Bend, Section 10 Hampton Park Drive and Otterdale Road MIDLOTHIAN: Hawkins Wood at The Grove, Section 1 North Otterdale Road Rosemont, Section F Preparer: Richard M/cElfish- Attachments: Yes ~-~ No Title: Director of Environmental Engineering # 144 TO: Board of Supervisors FRO~ Deparmmt of Environnmtal Engineering SUBJECr: State Road Acceptance - GREEN VISTA AT RIVERS BEND, SEC. 1 DISTRICT: BERMUDA MFF~TING DATE: 10 January 2001 ROADS FOR CONSIDERATION: GREEN VISTA CT GREEN VISTA DR Vicinity Map: GREEN VISTA AT RIVERS BEND, SEC. 1 TO: Board of Superhsors FROIvt ~t of Envirommntal Engineering SUBJF_L~: State Road Acceptance - RIVERS BEND, SEC. 10 DISTRICT: BERMUDA MEETING DATE: 10 January 2001 ROADS FOR (X)NSIDERATION: INVERNF_~ DR INVERNF_SS PL INVERNESS WAY Vicinity Map: RIVERS BEND, SEC. 10 TO: Board of SupelMsors FROM: Depmmmt of Environmental Engineering SUBJECT: State Road Acceptance - HAMPTON PARK DR, OTIE~AI E RD DISTRICT: MATOACA MEETING DATE: 10 January 2001 ROADS FOR CONSIDF_RATION: HAMPTON PARK DR OITERDALE RD Vicinity Map: HAMPTON PARK DR, OTIF_RDAI F, RD 147 TO: Board of Supervisors FRO~ ~t of Envirmamtal Engineering SUBJECt: State Road Acceptance - HAWKINS WOOD AT THE GROVE, SEC. 1 MEETING DATE: 10 January 2001 ROADS FOR CONSIDERATION: BIGGIN POND RD GOSWlCK RIDGE RD GRAVITY Hll L RD GROVE HILL RD HAWKINS WOOD CIR HAWKINS WOOD CT HAWKINS WOOD I_N Vicinity Map: HAWKINS WOOD AT THE GROVE, SEC. 1 TO: Board of Supm'vis~ FRONt I)etmmmnt of Environnmtal Engineering SUBJECT: State Road Acceptance- N OTIERDALE RD MEF~TING DATE: 10 January 2001 ROADS FOR CONSIDERATION: N OTYERDALE RD Vicinity Map: N OTIERDAI ~ RD TO: Board of Supervisors FROlVt ~t of Environrrental Engineering SUBJECt: State Road Acceptance - ROSEMONT, SEC. F MEETING DATE: 10 January 2001 ROADS FOR CONSIDERATION: ,BRIDGE WAY FOII ,¢NSBEE DR LATHAM BLVD LATHAM CT LATHAM PL Vicinity Map: ROSEMONT, SEC. F ?roduco:l by Clle~t~'fteld Cotmty (~S CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Meetin~ Date: January 10, 2001 Item Number: 8.c.4.a. Subject: Approval of Water Contract for Korean Canaan Church Addition - 8001 Walmsley Boulevard - Contract Number 00-0055 County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors approve this contract and authorize the County Administrator to execute any necessary documents. Summary of Information: This project includes the extension of 422 L.F.± of 12" oversized water lines. The Developer is required to have an 8" water line to serve his development. Staff has requested that the water lines be oversized to provide service to adjoining properties. In accordance with the ordinance, the Developer is entitled to refunds for the construction cost of the oversized improvements. Developer: Contractor: Korean Canaan Church of Richmond Champion Construction Company of Virginia Contract Amount: Estimated Total - Total Estimated County Cost: Water (Oversizing) Estimated Developer Cost Code: District: Clove~/~ill Preparer: ./~,/ - - ~// Title: (Cash Refund - Oversizing) $25,375.00 $3,074.00 $22,301.00 5B-572WO-E4C Assistant Director Attachments: Yes ~-~ No CONTRACT NUMBER 00-0055 WYNTREBROOKE DR PROPOSED KOREAN CANON CHURCH ADDITION #00.0055 IROOKE DR KOREAN CANAAN CHURCH ADDITION 8001 WALMSLEY BOULEVARD CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of I Meeting Date: January 10, 2001 Item Number: 8.C.4.b. Subject: Approval of Water Contract for St. Matthias Church Addition - Contract Number 99-0281 County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors approve this contract and authorize the County Administrator to execute any necessary documents. Summary of Information: This project includes the extension of 72 L.F.± of 16" oversized water lines. The Developer is required to have an 8" water line to serve his development. Staff has requested that the water lines be oversized to provide service to adjoining properties. In accordance with the ordinance, the Developer is entitled to refunds for the construction cost of the oversized improvements. Developer: Contractor: St. Matthias Church Decked Out, Inc. Contract Amount: Estimated Total - Total Estimated County Cost: Water (Oversizing) Estimated Developer Cost Code: (Cash Refund - Oversizing) District: Midlothian $9,750.00 $1,904.00 $7,846.00 5B-572WO-E4C ,~///J. E. B~k, Jr. Assistant Director Attachments: Yes ~ No CONTRACT NUMBER 99-0281 Proposed St. Matthias Church Addition #99-0281 Castlestone ROad Oak Lane ST. MATTHIAS CHURCH ADDITION lo4 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Meeting Date: January 10, 2001 Item Number: s.c.5. Subject: Approval of Sewer Contract for WaWa at the Boulders Offsite Sewer Extension - Contract Number 00-0078 County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors approve this contract and authorize the County Administrator to execute any necessary documents. Summary of Information: This project includes an offsite extension of 1,180 L.F.± of 8" wastewater lines. In accordance with the ordinance, the Developer is entitled to refunds through connection fees for the construction cost of the offsite improvements. Developer: Contractor: WPB & DSF, LLC Castle Equipment Corporation Contract Amount: Estimated Total - Total Estimated County Cost: Wastewater (Offsite) (Refund thru connections) Estimated Developer Cost Code: (Sewer - Offsite) District: Midl~ian : L~' . E.~,Jr. Title: $92,939.85 $3,663.00 $89,276.85 5N-572VO-E4D Assistant Director Attachments: Yes [-~ No CONTRACT NUMBER 00-0078 ProposedWaWa at the Boulders #00-0078 Boulder Springs Road TUrnpike WAWA ~ THE BOULDERS OFFSITE WASTEWATER EXTENSION CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Meetin~l Date: January10, 2001 Item Number: 8.C.6. Subject: Approval of Utility Contract for Hampton Park, Sections 11 and 12 - Contract Number 00-0283 County Administrator's Comments:~;~_.~...,7~c4~ J- county Administrator: Board Action Requested: Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors approve this contract and authorize the County Administrator to execute any necessary documents. Summary of Information: This project includes the extension of 306 L.F.± of 18" and 746 L.F.± of 15" oversized wastewater lines. The Developer is required to have an 8" wastewater line to serve his development. Staff has requested that the wastewater lines be oversized to provide service to adjoining properties. In accordance with the ordinance, the Developer is entitled to refunds for the construction cost of the oversized improvements. Developer: Contractor: Hampton Park Associates, LLC RMC Contractors, Inc. Preparer: Contract Amount: Estimated Total - Total Estimated County Cost: Wastewater (Oversizing) Estimated Developer Cost Code: (Refund thru Connection Fees - Oversizing) District: Matoaca /~~~-'~ ~ Title: ,/~' //J. E. Bec~ Jr. $204,026.00 $11,588.00 $192,438.00 5N-572VO-E4C Assistant Director Attachments: Yes ~-~ No CONTRACT NUMBER 00-0283 0 TTERDALE ROAD COSBY ROAD PROPOSED HAMPTON PARI~ SECTION 11 & 12 ~'00-0283 PAI~K 5 HAMPTON PARK, SECTIONS 11 & 12 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Meeting Date: January 10, 2001 Item Number: 8.C. 7. Subject: Request for Permission for a Concrete Driveway to Encroach Within a Sixteen Foot Drainage Easement on Lot 27, Block K, Roxshire, Section 10 County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Reques~d: Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors grant permission for a concrete driveway to encroach within a 16' drainage easement on Lot 27, Block K, Roxshire, Section 10; subject to the execution of a license agreement. Summary of Information: Robert J. Davison has submitted an application requesting permission for a concrete driveway to encroach within a 16' drainage easement on Lot 27, Block K, Roxshire, Section 10. This request has been reviewed by staff and approval is recommended. District: Midlothian Preparer: ~,-~ -~. ~>~,~.~ John W. Harmon Title:Riqht of Way Manaqer Attachments: Yes No '" VICINITY SKETC,? Request Permission for a Concrete Driveway to Encroach within a 16' Drainage Easement on Lot 27, Block K, Roxshire, Section 10 0 0 'LN OLDE TRENADI!R CR cP~ OLDE C~ SILB' RADNO~ SWANH CR 07' .N Chesterfield County Department of Utilities Right Of Way Office 12/14/00 11;45 FAX 8045593418 THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT ON 12,-5-00 ]1 MADE AN ACCURATE FIELO SURVET · OF THE PROPERTY AS SHOWN HEREON; THAT ALL IMPROVEMENTS AND VI$1BIF' D/IDENCE OF F..AS[MENT$ ARE SHOWN HEREON; THAT THERE ARE NO ENCROACHMENTS BY IMPROVEMENTS £1THER FROM ADJOINING PROPERTY OR FRO~ SUBJECT PROPERW UPON ADU01NING 'PROPERTY, OTHER THAN ~ SHOWN HEREON; ACCORDING TO THE · CURRENT FEMA FLOOD RATE MAPS THIS PROPERTY IS LOCATED Wrrl.llN ZONI:' THIS SURVEY WAS PREPARED WITHOUT THE BENEFIT OF A TITLE REPORT. OWNER: ROBERT J. & HELEN P. DAVI~SON DB 1969 PG 1612 TAX MAP NO, 735-715-990§-00000 PUR: MARK W, & HELEN K. PATTERSON LOT 16 LOT 19 ... LOT 27x'-----~x ~( GN~GE CORNER ENCROACHE~ tNTO F. JkSEMENT AS SHOWN [ ON UNE __ CONCRETE ORIV~ NO.' ?..20 t / / 115' SEWER / EASEMENT. ~ / / / / / / / / / / laAletO~/ / / 002 / / LOT 28 LICENSE AREA 16' EASEMENT SCALE 1' = 40' JN 4785 UNE \ \ R=50.O0' L-'54.24' SWANHURST DRIVE 5o' R/W I / / / / / / / / / / / TO S/L EDGEV]EW LA EX?D LOT 26 'PHYSICAL SUI~E'~ PLAT SHOWING IMPROVEMENTS ON IX)T BLOCK K SECTION l0 ROY, SHIRE LOCATED IN ,,THE MIDLOTHIAN DISTRICT CHESTERFIELD COUNTY, VIRGINIA 422{ BONNIE BANK ROAD RICHMOND VIRGINIA 804-271-8038 OF DATE: i 2-5-00 FILE: CSM-4.581 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of I Meeting Date: January 10, 2001 Item Number: 8.C. 8. Subject: Request to Quitclaim a Portion of a Variable Width Drainage Easement Across the Property of Virginia Credit Union, Inc. County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: BoardActionRequested: Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors authorize the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors and the County Administrator to execute a quitclaim deed to vacate a portion of a variable width drainage easement across the property of Virginia Credit Union, Inc. Summary of Information' Virginia Credit Union, Inc., has requested the quitclaim of a portion of a variable width drainage easement across its property as shown on the attached plat. Staff has reviewed the request and recommends approval. District: Midlothian Preparer: ~ 7.--I, (~:~-~ John W. Harmon Title:Right of Way Manager Attachments: Yes No VICINITY SKETCH REQUEST TO QUITCLAIM A PORTION OF A VARIABLE WIDTH DRAINAGE EASEMENT ACROSS THE PROPERTY OF VIRGINIA CREDIT UNION, INC. N VIRGINIA CREDIT~ UNION, INC. CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Meeting Date: January 10, 2001 111111 Item Number: 8.c.9.a. Subject: To Approve a Resolution Concurring With the Inducement Resolution Adopted by the Harrisonburg Industrial Development Authority for the Benefit of the Virginia Public Broadcasting Board County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Adopt the attached resolution. Summary of Information: The Industrial Development Authority of the City of Harrisonburg is assisting Virginia's Public Television Station's with a financing for equipment required for the FCC's mandated conversion to a digital broadcast standard. Under the state code, the governing body of each locality in which this equipment will be located must concur with the Harrisonburg IDA's inducement resolution for the financing. Some of this new equipment will be used by WCVE and WCVW at their Sesame Street location in Chesterfield County. Therefore, the Board is being asked by Harrisonburg's IDA to adopt the attached resolution in order to secure new equipment for these public television stations and to comply with state law. Preparer: ?~ Steven L. Micas Title: County Attorney 0614:51727o1(51735.1) Attachments: Yes RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD, VIRGINIA WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of the County of Chesterfield, Virginia (the "Governing Body") has been asked by the Industrial Development Authority of the City of Harrisonburg, Virginia (the "Harrisonburg Authority") to concur with a resolution of inducement adopted by the Harrisonburg Authority at its meeting held on December 12, 2000, for the benefit of the Virginia Public Broadcasting Board (the "VPBB") to assist in financing the acquisition of certain equipment for the conversion of Virginia's public television stations to the Federal Communications Commission new digital standard (the "Project"); and WHEREAS, § 15.2-4905 of the Industrial Development and Revenue Bond Act, Chapter 49, Title 15.2, Code of Virginia of 1950, as amended (the "Act"), provides that if a locality has created an industrial development authority, no industrial development authority created by another locality may finance a facility located in the first locality unless the governing body of such first locality concurs with the inducement resolution adopted by such industrial development authority; and WHEREAS, a portion of the equipment constituting the Project will be located in the County of Chesterfield, Virginia and operated by the Virginia public television station or stations serving the Chesterfield area and the Governing Body constitutes the highest elected governmental unit of the County of Chesterfield, Virginia; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD, VIRGINIA: The Governing Body concurs with the resolution adopted by the Harrisonburg Authority and approves the loan by the Harrisonburg Authority for the benefit of the VPBB, as required by § 15.2-4905 of the Act. This resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption. Adopted by the Board of Supervisors of the County of Chesterfield, Virginia, this l0th day of January, 2001. [SEAL] Clerk, Board of Supervisors of the County of Chesterfield, Virginia 4 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 2 Meetin~ Date: January 10, 2001 Item Number: 8.c.9.b. Subject: Adoption of a Resolution relating to the FY2001 Lease Purchase Financing County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: The Board is requested to adopt the attached resolution approving the execution and delivery of the necessary agreements and acceptance of a bid for the purchase of the Series 2001 Certificates of Participation. Summary of Information: This item is the last of several Board actions required for the FY2001 lease purchase transaction. This item requests approval of the necessary documents associated with the sale and approval of the acceptance of a bid for the purchase of the Certificates of Participation. Previous actions of the Board established the framework for this financing. The Board has authorized financing the construction of the Juvenile Detention Home, the Information Systems Technology Building Expansion, the Airport Hangar, the Financial/Human Resources Information System and the Community Development Information System through a lease purchase agreement. The Board approved the leasing of real property associated with this sale after a public hearing on November 8, 2000. In addition, the proceeds of this sale are appropriated in the FY2001 Budget and Capital Improvement Program. Rebecca T. Dickson Title: Director, Budget & Management Attachments: Yes [-~No l# 167 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Meetin~ Date: January 10, 2001 (Continued): Page 2 of 2 This sale represents $13,725,000 principal amount of Certificates of Participation, Series 2001. The responsible bidder, whose proposal must represent the lowest true interest cost to the County, and whose proposal must be in accordance with the Detailed Notice of Sale, will be identified on January 10 after the bids are opened. Copies of the lease and related documents are available from the County Attorney's office and will be available at the meeting. RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD, VIRGINIA, APPROVING THE FORM AND THE TERMS, CONDITIONS AND PROVISIONS OF A GROUND LEASE, TO BE DATED AS OF JANUARY 1, 2001, TO BE ENTERED INTO BY AND BETWEEN THE COUNTY, AS LESSOR, AND SUNTRUST BANK OR A WHOLLY-OWNED LEASING SUBSIDIARY THEREOF, AS LESSEE, PROVIDING FOR THE LEASING BY THE COUNTY OF THE SITES OF THE COUNTY'S EXISTING JUVENILE DETENTION HOME, JUVENILE COURTS BUILDING AND INFORMATION SYSTEMS TECHNOLOGY BUILDING AND AN AIRPORT HANGAR AT THE CHESTERFIELD COUNTY AIRPORT AND SUCH BUILDINGS NOW OR HEREAFTER EXISTING THEREON, AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR OR DEPUTY COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR TO EXECUTE AND DELIVER SUCH GROUND LEASE; APPROVING THE FORM AND THE TERMS, CONDITIONS AND PROVISIONS OF A LEASE/PURCHASE AGREEMENT, TO BE DATED AS OF JANUARY 1, 2001, TO BE ENTERED INTO BY AND BETWEEN SUNTRUST BANK OR A WHOLLY-OWNED LEASING SUBSIDIARY THEREOF, AS LESSOR, AND THE COUNTY, AS LESSEE, PROVIDING FOR THE LEASING TO THE COUNTY OF SUCH SITES AND BUILDINGS AND A FINANCIAL/HUMAN RESOURCES INFORMATION SYSTEM AND A COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM TO BE ACQUIRED AND INSTALLED FOR THE COUNTY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR OR DEPUTY COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR TO EXECUTE AND DELIVER SUCH LEASE/PURCHASE AGREEMENT; APPROVING THE FORM AND THE TERMS, CONDITIONS AND PROVISIONS OF A TRUST AGREEMENT, TO BE DATED AS OF JANUARY 1, 2001, TO BE ENTERED INTO BY AND AMONG THE COUNTY, SUNTRUST BANK, AS TRUSTEE, AND SUNTRUST BANK OR A WHOLLY- OWNED LEASING SUBSIDIARY THEREOF, AS LESSOR UNDER THE LEASE/PURCHASE AGREEMENT AND AUTHORIZING THE COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR OR DEPUTY COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR TO EXECUTE AND DELIVER SUCH TRUST AGREEMENT; AUTHORIZING THE MEMBERS OF SUCH BOARD AND THE OFFICIALS AND EMPLOYEES OF SUCH COUNTY TO TAKE FURTHER ACTION TO CARRY OUT THIS RESOLUTION AND THE TRANSACTIONS CONTEMPLATED HEREBY AND BY THE AFOREMENTIONED GROUND LEASE, REAL PROPERTY LEASE/PURCHASE AGREEMENT AND TRUST AGREEMENT; AND MAKING CERTAIN FINDINGS AND DETERMINATIONS WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors (the "Board") of the County of Chesterfield, Virginia (the "County"), has determined that it is advisable for the County to enter into a Ground Lease, to be dated as of January 1, 2001, by and between the County, as lessor, and SunTrust Bank or a wholly-owned leasing subsidiary thereof (hereinafter defined as "the "Leasing Company"), as lessee, providing for the leasing by the County to the Leasing Company of the sites of the County's existing Juvenile Detention Home, Juvenile Courts Building and Information 358813.3 022282 RES Systems Technology Building and an Airport Hangar at the Chesterfield County Airport and such buildings now or hereafter existing thereon and has heretofore conducted a public hearing with respect to the same in accordance with Section 15.2-1800.B of the Code of Virginia, 1950, on November 8, 2000; and WHEREAS, the Board has determined that it is advisable for the County to enter into a Lease/Purchase Agreement, to be dated as of January 1, 2001, by and between the Leasing Company, as lessor, and the County, as lessee, providing for the leasing by the County from such sites and such buildings and a Financial/Human Resources Information System and a Community Development Information System to be acquired and installed for the County; and WHEREAS, the Board has determined that it is advisable for the County to enter into a Trust Agreement (hereinafter defined as the "Trust Agreement"), to be dated as of January 1, 2001, by and among SunTrust Bank, as Trustee (hereinafter defined as the "Trustee"), the Leasing Company and the County; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD, VIRGINIA: SECTION 1. Definitions "Ground Lease" shall mean the Ground Lease, to be dated January 1, 2001, to be entered into by and between the County, as lessor, and the Leasing Company, as lessee. "Lease/Purchase Agreement" shall mean Lease/Purchase Agreement, to be dated as of January 1, 2001, to be entered into by and between the Leasing Company, as lessor, and the County, as lessee, providing for the leasing of the Project to the County. "Leasing Company" shall mean SunTrust Bank, a banking corporation organized and existing under and by virtue of the laws of State of Georgia, or a wholly-owned leasing subsidiary of SunTrust Bank. "Project" shall have the meaning given to such term in Article I of the Lease/Purchase Agreement. "Trust Agreement" shall mean the Trust Agreement, to be dated as of January 1, 2001, to be entered into by and among the Trustee, the Leasing Company and the County. "Trustee" shall mean SunTrust Bank, a banking corporation organized and existing under and by virtue of the laws of the State of Georgia and having a corporate trust office in the City of Richmond, Virginia. 358813.3 022282 RES "2001 Certificates" shall mean the Certificates of Participation, Series 2001, dated January 1, 2001, to be issued under the Trust Agreement. SECTION 2. Findings and Determinations. The Board hereby finds and determines that: (a) The leasing of the Project is presently essential to the County and is anticipated to continue to be essential to the County. (b) The representations set forth in Section 2.1 of the Lease/Purchase Agreement are true and correct on and as of the date of adoption of this Resolution. (c) The statements set forth in Section 4.4 of the Lease/Purchase Agreement accurately reflect the intention of the Board with respect to the subject matter thereof, subject to the qualification recited therein that the Board is not empowered to make any commitment beyond the current fiscal year of the County. (d) A Summary Notice of Sale of the 2001 Certificates (the "Summary Notice of Sale") was published on January 3, 2001, in The Bond Buyer, a financial journal published in the City of New York, New York, and a Detailed Notice of Sale of the 2001 Certificates, dated January 2, 2001 (the "Detailed Notice of Sale"), an Official Bid Form relating to the 2001 Certificates (the "Official Bid Form") and a Preliminary Offering Statement, dated January 2, 2001 relating to the Certificates (the "Preliminary Offering Statement"), were prepared and distributed to prospective purchasers of the 2001 Certificates. (e) The Summary Notice of Sale and the Detailed Notice of Sale provided that sealed bids for the purchase of the 2001 Certificates would be received by or on behalf of the County, at Room 402, 4th Floor, Chesterfield County Administration Building, 9901 Lori Road, Chesterfield, Virginia 23832, until 11:00 A.M., Eastern Standard Time, on Wednesday, January 10, 2001, at which time and place all sealed bids would be publicly opened. (f) Pursuant to the Detailed Notice of Sale, eight (8) bids for the purchase of the 2001 Certificates were received, each accompanied by a certified or bank cashier's good faith check payable to the order of the County of Chesterfield, Virginia, in the amount of $137,250, or in lieu thereof a Surety Bond as provided in the Detailed Notice of Sale. (g) The names of the bidders submitting each such bid and the true interest cost resulting from each such bid are as follows: 358813.3 022282 RES Name of Bidder True Interest Cost ABN AMRO 4.310350% William R. Hough 4.332580 First Union 4.338821 Ferris Baker 4.364599 Merrill Lynch 4.394820 Davenport 4.416362 BB&T 4.480801 Morgan Keegan 4.515463 (h) After due consideration of all such bids, the Board has determined that (i) ABN AMRO (the "Purchaser") is a responsible bidder; (ii) of the bids received, the bid of the Purchaser (the "Bid") is the bid to purchase the 2001 Certificates at the lowest true interest cost, determined in accordance with the provisions of the Detailed Notice of Sale; and (iii) the Bid is the best bid received, is in accordance with the Detailed Notice of Sale and should be accepted. (i) The Board has determined that the Bid, being a bid to purchase the Certificates at a true interest cost of 4.310350%, plus accrued interest from the date of the 2001 Certificates to the date of delivery thereof by the Trustee and payment therefor by the Purchaser, with the 2001 Certificates to bear interest at the rates per annum specified in the Bid, shall be accepted and the 2001 Certificates shall be awarded to the Purchaser. (j) The details of the 2001 Certificates shall be as set forth in the Detailed Notice of Sale, the Preliminary Offering Statement and the Bid of the Purchaser accepted pursuant to Section 2(i) of this Resolution. The 2001 Certificates shall be in the form set forth as Exhibit A to the Trust Agreement and shall bear interest at the rates set forth in the Bid of the Purchaser. SECTION 3. Approval of the Form of the Ground Lease and the Terms, Conditions and Provisions Thereof; Authorization and Direction of Execution and Delivery of the Ground Lease. The form of the Ground Lease presented to and filed with the minutes of the meeting of the Board at which this Resolution is being adopted and the terms, conditions and provisions thereof, are hereby approved, ratified and confirmed, and the County Administrator or any Deputy County Administrator is hereby authorized and directed to execute and deliver to the Leasing Company the Ground Lease in such form, together with such changes as shall be approved by the County Administrator or Deputy County Administrator executing the same upon advice of counsel to the County, such approval to be conclusively evidenced by his execution thereof. SECTION 4. Approval of the Form of the Lease/Purchase Agreement and the Terms, Conditions and Provisions Thereof; Execution and Delivery of the Lease/Purchase Agreement. The form of the Lease/Purchase Agreement presented to and filed with the minutes of the meeting of the Board at which this Resolution is being adopted and the terms, conditions 358813.3 022282 RES and provisions thereof (including in particular the Base Payments required to be paid under Section 4.3(a) thereof as the same shall be set forth in Exhibit C thereto and the other rental payments required to be paid under such Section 4.3(a)) are hereby approved, ratified and confirmed, and, subject to the execution and delivery by the County of the Ground Lease in accordance with Section 3, the County Administrator or any Deputy County Administrator is hereby authorized and directed to execute and deliver to the Leasing Company the Lease/Purchase Agreement in such form, together with such changes as shall be approved by the County Administrator or Deputy County Administrator executing the same upon the advice of counsel to the County, such approval to be conclusively evidenced by his execution thereof. SECTION 5. Approval of the Form of the Trust Agreement and the Terms, Conditions and Provisions Thereof; Execution and Delivery_ of the Trust Agreement; Approval of Appointment of Trustee. (a) The form of the Trust Agreement presented to and filed with the minutes of the meeting of the Board at which this Resolution is being adopted and the terms, conditions and provisions thereof, are hereby approved, ratified and confirmed, and, subject to the execution and delivery by the County of the Ground Lease in accordance with Section 3, the County Administrator or any Deputy County Administrator is hereby authorized and directed to execute and deliver the Trust Agreement to the Trustee and the Leasing Company, together with such changes as shall be approved by the County Administrator or Deputy County Administrator executing the same upon the advice of counsel to the County, such approval to be conclusively evidenced by his execution thereof. (b) The Board hereby approves the appointment of SunTrust Bank as Trustee under the Trust Agreement. SECTION 6. Offering Statement; Continuing Disclosure Certificate; Certificates Concerning Offering Statement; Ratification of Actions Taken With Respect to Summary Notice of Sale, Detailed Notice of Sale, Official Bid Form and Preliminary Offering Statement. The delivery to the Purchaser of an Offering Statement, dated January 10, 2001, relating to the 2001 Certificates, in substantially the form of the Preliminary Offering Statement presented to the meeting of the Board at which this Resolution is being adopted (the "Offering Statement"), after the same has been completed by the insertion of the maturities, interest rates and other details of the 2001 Certificates and by making such other insertions, changes or corrections as the County Administrator, based on the advice of the County's financial advisors and legal counsel (including Bond Counsel), deems necessary or appropriate, is hereby approved; and the Board hereby approves the use by the Purchaser of the Offering Statement and the information contained therein in connection with the sale of the 2001 Certificates. The Preliminary Offering Statement is "deemed final" for purposes of Rule 15c2-12 promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The County Administrator is hereby further authorized to execute and deliver to the Purchaser a Continuing Disclosure Certificate evidencing the County's undertaking, to comply with the continuing disclosure requirements of Paragraph (b)(5) of such Rule 15c2-12 to the extent applicable to the 2001 Certificates, such Continuing Disclosure Certificate to be in substantially the form set forth in 358813.3 022282 RES Appendix C to the form of the Preliminary Offering Statement, together with such changes as shall be approved by the County Administrator upon the advice of counsel (including the County Attorney or Bond Counsel to the County), such approval to be conclusively evidenced by his execution of such Continuing Disclosure Certificate. The County Administrator and the Director of Accounting and the County Attorney are hereby authorized and directed to execute on behalf of the County and deliver to the Purchaser certificates in substantially the forms referred to in the Offering Statement under the caption "CERTIFICATES CONCERNING OFFERING STATEMENT". The Board ratifies the actions taken with respect to the preparation and publication of the Summary Notice of Sale and the preparation and distribution of the Detailed Notice of Sale, the Official Bid Form and the Preliminary Offering Statement, all in the forms presented to and filed with the minutes of the meeting of the Board at which this Resolution is being adopted. SECTION 7. Tax Covenant. The County covenants and agrees to comply with the provisions of Sections 103 and 141-150 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 and the applicable Treasury Regulations promulgated thereunder throughout the term of the 2001 Certificates. SECTION 8. Further Action of the Board and of the Officials and Employees of the County. The members of the Board and the officials and employees of the County are hereby authorized and directed to take any and all such further action as upon advice of counsel to the County they shall deem necessary or desirable in order to carry out, give effect to and consummate the transactions contemplated by this Resolution and by the terms of the Ground Lease, the Lease/Purchase Agreement and the Trust Agreement and by any of the documents referred to herein or therein or approved hereby or thereby. SECTION 9. Repeal of Conflicting Resolutions. All resolutions, or portions thereof, heretofore adopted by the Board which are in conflict or inconsistent with this Resolution are hereby repealed to the extent of such inconsistency. SECTION 10. Effectiveness of Resolution. This Resolution shall be effective from and after its adoption. 358813.3 022282 RES CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Meeting Date: JANUARY 10, 2001 Item Number: 9.¢.9.c. Subject: Approval of Resolution and Request of Recreation Access Grant Funds for Grove Shaft Park Phase I; and Authorization for the County Administrator to Enter Into an Agreement with VDOT for the Construction of the Access Road County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: The Board of Supervisors is requested to approve the attached resolution requesting grant funding up to $75,000, for the construction of an entrance and turn lanes to Grove Shaft Park. The resolution also requests designation of the new roadway as a Virginia Byway. The Board of Supervisors is also requested to authorize the County Administrator to enter into an agreement with VDOT for the construction of the access road. Summary of Information: Property for Grove Shaft Park was donated by an area developer in 2000. Grove Shaft Park is designated a specialty recreational facility in the Park system. The Park is a major historic site within the County, state and region, housing the first deep shaft mining operation and first railroad. Grant funds from the VDOT Recreation Access Program are required to construct the entrance and turn lanes into the Park. Matching funds will not be required by the County. Facilities in this Park will eventually include interpretive areas for coal mining, extensive trail system, restrooms, '~7 '~c areas. Preparer: Title: Director, Parks and Recreation Michael S. Golden Attachments: Yes [~] No WHEREAS, the Grove Shaft Park is owned and is to be developed by the County of Chesterfield as a recreational facility serving the residents of Chesterfield County and adjoining counties; and WHEREAS, the facility is in need of adequate access; and WHEREAS, the right-of-way of the proposed access is provided by the County of Chesterfield at no cost to the state; and WHEREAS, the procedure governing the allocation of recreational access funds set forth in Section 33-136.3, Code of Virginia 1950, as amended, requires joint action by the Department of Conservation and Historic Resources and the Highway and Transportation Board; and WHEREAS, a statement of policy agreed upon between the said Director and Board approves the use of such funds for the construction of access roads to publicly-owned recreational areas; and WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County has duly adopted a zoning ordinance pursuant to Article 8 (Section 15.1-486 et. Seq.), Chapter 11, title 15.1; and WHEREAS, it appears to the Board that all requirements of the law have been met to permit the Director of Conservation and Historic Resources to designate Grove Shaft Park as a recreational facility and further permit the Virginia Highway and Transportation Board to provide funds for access to this public recreation area in accordance with Section 33-136.3, Code of Virginia 1950, as amended; and WHEREAS, the Board acknowledges that pursuant to the provisions of Section 33.1-233, as amended, this road shall be designated a "Virginia Byway" and recommends the State Highway and Transportation Board in cooperation with the Director of Conservation and Historic Resources, take the appropriate action to implement this designation; and further, the Board agrees, that in keeping with the intent of Section 33.1-63, to use its good office to reasonably protect the aesthetic or cultural value of this road. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County hereby requests the Director of Conservation and Historic Resources to designate the Grove Shaft Park as a public recreation area, and to recommend to the State Highway and Transportation Board that the recreational access funds be allocated for an access road to service said Park. AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Virginia Highway and Transportation Board is hereby requested to allocate the necessary recreational access funds to provide a suitable access road as hereinbefore described. CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page I of 1 Meeting Date: January 10, 2001 Item Number: 8.C. 10.a. Subject: Change Order #2 for County Project. #99-0.151 Brandermill W/L Rehabilitation - Phase II County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: The Board of Supervisors is requested to approve Change Order #2 for an increase of $41,656.88 and authorize the County Administrator to execute the necessary documents. Summary of Information: In addition to replacing the water lines, this project also requires the contractor to tamp existing water line and sewerline settlements in the right of way and restore with stone and asphalt. The amount of restoration was unknown until the contractor began tamping the settled areas. This change order represents the restoration of 2909 square yards of restoration. The original construction cost was $221,611.76. new construction cost will be $278,737.52. With this change order, the Funds for this project are available in the current CIP. Preparer: Y . Covin~n~~ Title:Assistant Director of Utilities Attachments: [---~ Yes No 175 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Meeting Date: January 10, 2001 Item Number: 8. c. 10.b. Subject: Change Order #5 for County Project #95-0156R Swift Creek Water Treatment Plant Water Quality Laboratory County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: The Board of Supervisors is requested to approve Change Order #5 for an increase of $20,326.28 and authorize the County Administrator to execute the necessary documents. Summary of Information: Change Order #5 represents the additions of items (list attached) to the contract documents agreed upon by the County, contractor and consultant, Whitman, Requardt and Associates. The original construction cost was $1,923,000.00. With this change order, the new construction cost will be $1,983,110.72. Funds for this project are available in the current CIP. Preparer: Ro~~E. 2. ~~"~ Title: Covington~ Yes ~-~ No Attachments: Assistant Director of Utilities 176 Whitman, Requardt and Associates, LLP CONTRACT # PROJECT: OWNER: 95-0156R/IFB#98/99-2121-8148 Swift Creek Water Quality Lab Department of Public Utilities Chesterfield County, Virginia CHANGE ORDER CHANGE ORDER NO: 005 DATE: October 23, 2000 CONTRACTOR: Southwood Builders, Inc. DESCRIPTION: This change order includes the following additions to the contract documents agreed upon by the County, Southwood Builders Inc. and Whitman, Requardt and Associates, LLP. Item 1' Change order is for additional costs to install a electrical disconnect at the relocated transformer in the Mechanical room. An increase in construction cost of $ 3,335.27 and no time extension is granted for adding the electrical disconnect. Item 2: Change order is for additional costs to modify the grade beams in proximity to the WTP's 30" £mished water pipeline. This extra is in response to Change Bulletin #3. An increase in construction cost of $ 788.00 and a 10 day time extension are granted for modifications to the grade beams. Item 3: Change order is for additional costs to repair the area on the existing WTP building where the existing entrance stairs had been removed. This extra is in response to Change Bulletin #5. An increase in construction cost of $ 2,737.69 and a 4 day time extension are granted for repairing the face of the existing WTP building. Item 4: Change order is for providing an additional duplex electrical receptacle in the Electrical Room. This extra is in response to Change Bulletin #6. An increase in the construction cost of $272.54 and no time extension is granted for the additional duplex electrical receptacle. Item 5: Change order is for painting of the exterior floor beams above the proposed parking area. This extra is in response to RFI #98. An increase in the construction cost of $ 2,004.35 and no time extension is granted for the additional painting. Item 6: Change order is for additional costs to tar coat the exiting paving around WTP building to match the new paving installed as part of this contract. This extra is in response to County request to coat the existing paving areas. An increase in the construction cost of $ 4,082.92 and no time extension is granted for providing the tar coat. Item 7: Change order is for additional costs provide EIFS ceiling fmish in the Vestibule Area. This is in response to item 14.6 of the Progress Meeting Minutes. An increase in the construction cost of $ 795.37 and no time extension is granted. Item 8: Change order is for additional costs to revise the soffit trim on the bridge structure. This extra is in response to WRA's response to RFI #101. An increase in the construction cost of $ 3,072.27 and no time extension is granted for revising the soffit trim installation. Item 9: Change order is for additional costs to remove exhaust hoods from RTU 1 and connect them to RTU 2. This extra is in response to Change Bulletin #7 and WRA's response to RFI #108. An increase in the construction cost of $ 2,391.59 and a 3 day time extension is granted for the HVAC modification. Item 10: Change order is for additional costs to install additional electrical facilities (electrical receptacle, smoke detector, and other minor items) identified by the fire marshall and WRA's response to RFI #85. An increase in the construction cost of $ 846.28 and no time extension is granted for providing the additional electrical facilities. · J:\ 13202\corresp\co004.wpd CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 2 Meeting Date: Subject: January 10, 2001 Item Number: 8.c.11. Award of Construction Contract for County Project ~99-0122B, Midlothian Pump Station and Tank County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: The Board of Supervisors is requested to award the construction contract to Richard L. Crowder Construction, Inc. in the amount of $644,068.00 and authorize the County Administrator to execute the necessary documents. Summary of Information: This project consists of the preliminary sitework at the Watkins Elementary School prior to building the tank and pump station. Work includes onsite water lines, construction of an entrance road from Woolridge Road along the Virginia Power easement, and site grading. Staff received nine(9) bids ranging from $644,068.00 to $1,049,510.01. The lowest bid was in the amount of $644,068.00 by Richard L. Crowder Construction, Inc. The county's engineering consultant, Austin Brockenbrough and Associates, has evaluated the bids and recommends award of the contract to the low bidder, Richard L. Crowder Construction, Inc. Funds are available in the current CIP. Preparer: E. 'Covi~ Title:Assistant Director of Utilities Attachments: Yes -]No BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 2 of 2 SITE 288 (UNDER CONSTRUCTION) NO SCALE CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 3 Meeting Date: January 10, 2001 Item Number: s.c. ll. Subject: Award of Construction Contract for County Project #00-0285, Courthouse Tank Painting County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: The Board of Supervisors is requested to award the construction contract to Brickwood Contractors, Inc. in the amount, $535,000.00, appropriate $210,000 from fund balance and authorize the County Administrator to execute the necessary documents. Summary of Information: This project consists of painting and repairing the Courthouse Tank. When the original appropriation was added to the CIP the tank was in service. During the preparation of the contract documents, the tank level was drawn down and the inside of the tank was inspected by the engineer and staff. At that time, it was determined that the roof beams needed to be seal welded to the roof. This work was added to the painting project. Staff received four(4) bids ranging from $535,000.00 to $638,250.00. The lowest bid was in the amount of $535,000.00 by Brickwood Contractors, Inc. The county's engineering consultant, R. Stuart Royer and Associates, evaluated the bids and recommends award of the contract to the low bidder, Brickwood Contractors, Inc. Preparer: Cr~~?t Title: Director of Utilities Attachments: Yes No BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 2 of 3 The low bid exceeds our existing appropriation and $210,000 will be appropriated from fund balance to cover this shortfall. Funds are available in the current CIP. CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 3 of 3 Meetina Date: Januarv t0. 2001 Number Bud.qet and Manaclement Comments: The Board of Supervisors is requested to award the construction contract for County Project #00-0285, Courthouse Tank Painting, to the low bidder, Brickwood Contractors, Inc. The low bid of $535,000 exceeds funds available in the Tank Rehabilitation project center by $210,000. The Department of Utilities requests that the Board of Supervisors appropriate $210,000 from the Water Operating Fund balance to the Tank Rehabilitation project center to cover the contract cost. Funds are available in the Water Operating Fund for the transfer. Preparerl ~,~-~~'/~l~r"~ Title= Director, Budflet & Manaqement Rebecca T. Dickson LOCATION OF COURTHOUSE TANK CHESTERFIELD, VIRGINIA CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Meeting Date: January 10, 2001 Item Number: 9.C.12. Subject: Initiate an Application for Substantial Accord to Permit a Visitors' Center for the Falling Creek Ironworks Historical Site County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: BoardActio. Reques~d: Initiate an application for substantial accord to permit a Visitors' Center for the Falling Creek Ironworks Historical Site on property at 6407 Jefferson Davis Highway: PIN 791-684-2065 and to appoint Stuart Connock, Parks & Recreation as the Board's Agent. Summary of Information: Substantial accord is required for construction of a Visitors' Center for the Falling Creek Ironworks Historical Site. This site is recommended by the Falling Creek Ironworks Foundation after public meetings were held in the community. District: Bermuda Preparer: Joh~W Title:Riqht of Way Manaqer Attachments: Yes No CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 2 Meetin~ Date: January 10, 2001 Item Number: iO.A. Subject: Developer Water and Sewer Contracts County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: The Board of Supervisors has authorized the County Administrator to execute water and/or sewer contracts between the County and the Developer where there are no County funds involved. The report is submitted to the Board members as information. Summary of Information' The following water and sewer contracts were executed by the County Administrator: Contract Number: Project Name: 96-0299 Montclair Section 1 at South Bend Developer: Southbend Landing, LLC Contractor: A. T. Carr Contractor Contract Amount: Water Improvements - Wastewater Improvements - $323,892.00 $571,137.00 District/~da Preparer: /... . ., . Title: Assistant Director Attachments: [---~ Yes No Agenda Item January 10, 2001 Page 2 o o Contract Number: Project Name: Developer: Contractor: Contract Amount: District: Contract Number: Project Name: Developer: Contractor: Contract Amount: District: Contract Number: Project Name: Developer: Contractor: Contract Amount: District: 99-0311 Tidewater Fiber Corporation @ Old Stage Road Tidewater Fiber II Corporation Shoosmith Brothers Construction Company, Water Improvements Wastewater Improvements - Bermuda Inc. $92,276.00 $80,790.00 00-0149 Moorefield Commons Moorefield Commons L.C. S. W. Rodgers Company, Inc. Water Improvements Wastewater Improvements - Clover Hill $46,455.49 $32,506.42 00-0325 Columbia Gas Fire Line Emerson 1 LLC Castle Equipment Corporation Water Improvements - Bermuda $26,880. O0 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Meeting Date: January 10, 2001 Item Number: iO.B. Su~ect: Status of General Fund Balance, District Improvement Fund, and County Administrator's Commen~: Reserve for Future Lease Purchases Capital Projects, County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Summary of Information: Preparer: Lane B. Ramsey Attachments: Yes [-~No Title: County Administrator BOARD MEETING DATE 07/01/00 11/08/00 11/08/00 11/08/00 12/20/00 12/20/00 12/20/00 12/20/00 12/20/00 12/20/00 12/20/00 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY GENERAL FUND BALANCE January 10, 2001 DESCRIPTION FY2001 Actual Beginning Fund Balance Designate excess revenue (County) for non- recurring Rems in FY2002 Designate excess expenditures (County) for non-recurring items in FY2002 Designate excess revenue (Schools) for non- recurring items in FY2002 FY00 Results of Operations - Fire FY00 Results of Operations - Parks and Recreation FY00 Results of Operations - Police FY00 Results of Operations - Libraries FY00 Results of Operations - School Match Study FY00 Results of Operations - Department Relocation in Administration Building FY00 Results of Operations - Schools unspent General Fund Transfer AMOUNT (4,017,649) (135,725) (3,822,401) (901,800) (171,600) (110,000) (327,200) (92,925) (210,000) (996,388) BALANCE $45,558,346 41,540,697 41,404,972 37,582,571 36,680,771 36,509,171 36,399,171 36,071,971 35,979,046 35,769,046 34,772,658 Board Meeting Date CHESTERFIELD COUNTY RESERVE FOR FUTURE CAPITAL PRO/ECTS TRADITIONALLY FUNDED BY DEBT January 10, 2001 Description Amount FOR FISCAL YEAR 2000 BEGII~q_NG JULY 1, 1999 4/28/99 FY2000 Budgeted Addition 8,034,500 (7,120,900) 4/28/99 FY2000 Capital Projects 8~5~9 Transfer to LaPrade Library Project for construction (150,000) 9/17/99 Partial Release of designation for Henricus Land Purchase based on final grant award 104,425 Transfer to Circuit Court Project for construction of courtrooms/chambers/parking lot 0oo,ooo) 2~3~0 Transfer to Coalboro Road Extended Project for construction in conjunction with Vulcan Materials Company 050,000) 4/12/00 Transfer for Eeoff Avenue Land Acquisition for recreational and athletic facilities (250,000) 5~00 Release desi~ation for FY2000 road projects local match not approved by VDOT: Point of Rocks Road Bike Trail, Phase I Centre Street Streetlight Cogbill Road Sidewalk Salem Church Road Sidewalk 48,000 8,000 26,000 15,200 6/28/O0 Transfer for construction of the range master's and training buildings located at Public Safety Training Facility in Enon. 0oo,ooo) 6/30/00 Return unused funds; closure of various completed projects 30,724 Balance $ 8,650,602 1,529,702 1,379,702 1,484,127 1,184,127 834,127 584,127 681,327 381,327 412,051 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2001 BEG~G JULY 1, 2000 4/12/00 FY01 Budgeted Addition 4/12/00 FY01 Capital Projects 8,400,000 (6,939,600) 8,812,051 1,872,451 C~ Prepared by Aocounting Department Deoember 31,200O SCHEDULE OF CAPITALIZED LEASE PURCHASES Date Began APPROVED ANDEXECUTED Description Date Ends Out.marling Balance 12/31/00 * 12/93 04/99 06/99 Real Property Lease/ Purchase Public Faoility Lease Juvenile Courts Project School Copier Lease $17,510,000 16,100,000 43,587 12/01 11/19 06/04 2,475,000 15,295,000 32,284 TOTAL APPROVED AND EXECUTED $33.653.58~7 $17,802,284 PENDING EXECUTION Description Telephone System Upgrade - Lease Purchase Approved September 13, 2000 Building Construction, Expansion and Renovation and Systems- Certificates of Participation Approved O~tober 25, 2000 Approved Amount $1,222,370 19,885,000 TOTAL APPROVED AND PENDING EXECUTION $21.107.37~0 *Second Refunding of Certificates of Participation, Series 1985 WHEREAS, the Honorable Arthur S. Warren, Supervisor representing the Clover Hill District, served as Chairman of the Board of Supervisors from January 2000 to December 2000, and during this period, demonstrated outstanding leadership and insight in handling many diverse and challenging issues facing the county; was responsive to the needs of citizens; exhibited an unwavering dedication to maintaining a high quality of life for Chesterfield County citizens; and tirelessly promoted Chesterfield County as a FIRST CHOICE community throughout the region, state, and nation; and WHEREAS, Mr. Warren has consistently exhibited fairness, integrity, compassion, and commitment that have been recognized by the Board, citizens, the business community, and local and state officials; and WHEREAS, under Mr. Warren's Chairmanship, the County achieved many successes including achieving a AAA Rating from Standard & Poor's; forming the Tax Structure Committee which presented its recommendations to the Board in November 2000; continuing to target tax reductions such as tax relief for the elderly, enterprise zone and BPOL taxes; approving the implementation of a County-wide BMP maintenance program for residential BMPs and for stream restoration projects; receiving thirteen National Association of Counties (NACo) Awards, as well as thirteen NACo Information Officers Awards; completing the Route 360 West Corridor Design Study and creating the 360 West Corridor Committee; adopting the new Comprehensive Plan Summary; and recognition of the Chesterfield Community Services Board by the Rehabilitation Accreditation Commission for their high quality of services based on national standards for excellence; and WHEREAS, other successes under Mr. Warren's Chairmanship include completion of the new Nursing Home; the backbone for the new Public Safety Communications system; Fire Station 17 in Centralia; and the Clover Hill Sports Complex Phase II project, which includes seven soccer/football fields; substantial progress on the new LaPrade and Chester libraries and the Small Arms Training facility; expanding community policing efforts with the opening of the Jefferson Davis District Police Station; beginning the expansion of the Juvenile Detention Home and Information Systems Technology building; purchasing the 50 acre Grove Shaft Coal Mines Historical Park site, currently under construction; the Route 288 extension from Powhite Parkway to Powhatan Line; the widening of Chippenham Parkway from Powhite Parkway to Hull Street Road; (project now complete), and currently under construction, the widening of Chippenham Parkway from Hull Street Road to Jefferson Davis Highway; the widening of Hull Street Road from Route 288 to Winterpock Road (currently under design) and the van service implementation currently underway. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors publicly recognizes and applauds the untiring efforts displayed by its 2000 Chairman, the Honorable Arthur S. Warren. AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors does hereby present Mr. Warren with a plaque recognizing his distinguished service from January 2000 to Dece~%ber 2000. CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Meeting Date: January 10, 2001 Item Number: 14.A. Su~ect: Resolution Recognizing Miss Elizabeth Catherine Blake Upon Attaining the Gold Award County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Adoption of the attached resolution Summary of Information' The Board is requested to adopt the attached resolution recognizing Miss Elizabeth Catherine Blake, Troop 777, sponsored by Woodlake United Methodist Church, upon attaining the Gold Award. Resides in the Matoaca District. Preparer: ~~ ~_l~ Lisa H. Elko Title: Clerk to the Board Attachments: Ycs No RECOGNIZING MISS ELIZABETH CATHERINE BLAKE UPON ATTAINING THE GOLD AWARD WHEREAS, the Girl Scouts of the United States of America is an organization serving over 2.6 million girls and was founded to promote citizenship training and personal development; and WHEREAS, after earning four interest project patches, the Career Exploration Pin, the Senior Girl Scout Leadership Award, the Senior Girl Scout Challenge, and designing and implementing a Girl Scout Gold Award project; and WHEREAS, the Gold Award is the highest achievement award in Girl Scouting and symbolizes outstanding accomplishments in the areas of leadership, community service, career planning, and personal development; and WHEREAS, the Girl Scout Award can only be earned by girls aged 14-17 or in grades 9-12 and is received by less than six percent of those individuals entering the Girl Scouting movement; and WHEREAS, Miss Elizabeth Catherine Blake, Troop 777, sponsored by Woodlake United Methodist Church, has accomplished these high standards and has been honored with the Girl Scouts of America Gold Award by the Commonwealth Girl Scout Council of Virginia; and WHEREAS, growing through her experiences in Girl Scouting, learning the lessons of responsible citizenship, and priding herself on the great accomplishments of her Country, Elizabeth is indeed a member of a new generation of prepared young citizens of whom we can all be very proud. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors hereby extends its congratulations to Miss Elizabeth Catherine Blake and acknowledges the good fortune of the County to have such an outstanding young woman as one of its citizens. AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that a copy of this resolution be presented to Miss Blake and that this resolution be permanently recorded among the papers of this Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County, Virginia. CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page I of 1 Meeting Date: Subject: January lQ, 2001 Item Number: 14.B. Resolution Recognizing the Matoaca High School Girls Varsity Basketball Team for Their Outstanding Accomplishments During the 2000 Season and for Their Excellent Representation of Chesterfield County County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: The Honorable Renny Bush Humphrey has requested that the Board of Supervisors commend and recognize the Matoaca High School Girls Varsity Basketball Team for their Superior Achievements and Representation of Chesterfield County. Summary of Information' The Matoaca High School Girls Varsity Basketball Team represented Chesterfield County in the AA Girls' State Tournament. Their team compiled a 22-3 record, winning the Southside District and Tournament, Region 1 Regional Championship and were Semi-Finalists in the AA Girls State Tournament. Preparer: ~~.,/'"~ Title: Director, Parks and Recreation ~ichael S."~olden Attachments: Yes ~-~ No RECOGNIZING THE 2000 MATOACA WARRIORS GIRLS VARSITY BASKETBALL TEAM WHEREAS, participation in high school sports has long been an integral part of Chesterfield County's educational, physical and emotional development for students; and WHEREAS, Mr. Charles Payton, Coach of the Matoaca High School Girls Varsity Basketball Team completed his third year of coaching and was named Southside District Coach of the Year (for the second time) and was also named Regional Coach of the Year; and WHEREAS, under Mr. Payton's and his staff's guidance and direction, the 2000 Matoaca Lady Warriors finished the season with an overall record of 22-3; and WHEREAS, the Lady Warriors Tournament Champions; and were the Southside District and WHEREAS, the Lady Warriors were the Region 1 Regional Champions; and WHEREAS, the Lady Warriors were the Semi-Finalist in the AA Girls State Tournament; and WHEREAS, the team members include: Brenna Wolfe, Ureka Pettiford, Tashena Stephenson, Stephanie Cundiff, Renauda Bennett, Alona Abbey, Octavia Thompson, Tamesha Johnson, Angela Edwards, Katie Joyner, Tabitha Connelly, Mildred Lewis, Tiffany Tucker, Leigh-Ann Costley, and Deidre Keys. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors publicly recognizes the 2000 Matoaca High School Girls Varsity Basketball Team for its outstanding representation of Chesterfield County and its commitment to excellence and sportsmanship, and expresses their best wishes for continued success. CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page I of 1 Meetin[I Date: January 10, 2001 Item Number: Subject: Citizen Request To Address The Board Under "Hearings Of Citizens On Unscheduled Matters." County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested' Summary of Information' Mr. James V. Daniels has requested the opportunity to speak concerning the issue of high speed rail as it pertains to Chesterfield County. Preparer: Steven L. Micas Attachments: ~-~No Title:county Attorney 0822:51792.1 LflN6EST&DflNIELS REALTY TEL:804-748-2199 5an 04,Ul U:UU ESTABLISHED 1946 NO.UUI K.UI 4211 OLD HUNDRED RD. P. O. BOX O HE&'"f'EI~, VIRGINIA 23831 January 4, 200.1. · I ELEPHONE: (804) 748-2240 FAX: (804) 74P,.-2199 Ms. Lisa Elko Clerk to the Board of Supervisors Post Office Box 40 Chesterfield, VA 23892 Dear Ms. Elko: I would like to address tbs Board of Supervisors at 7 PM on 3anuary loth, 2001 in the time allo~ed fo~ citizens ~peaking on unscheduled matters. I &ntend Lo address the issue of hish speed rail as it pertains to Chesterfield and to present a solution on the subject for the Chesterfield Business Council. Please call me at the above number to confirm this. es V. Daniels JlqN-04-2881 ~9:2'7 884 '748 2199 P.OI CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page I of 3 ,Meetin~l Date: ,~anuaz7 x0, ~-00x Item Number: 16.A. Subject: Hold a Public Hearing to Revise FY01 School Board Operating Fund Appropriations .County. Administrator's Comments. County Administrator: Board Action Requested: The School Board requests the Board of Supervisors to hold a public hearing to increase estimated revenues in the School Operating Fund by $814,018 and increase appropriations in Instruction by $735,213 and in Pupil Transportation by $78,805 as noted in the attached resolution. Summary of Information: On November 14, 2000 the first quarter review was presented to the School Board reflecting an increase in State revenue of $814,018. The actual September 30 membership of 51,375 reported from the schools, excluding preschool and postgraduate students, reflected an increase of 286 students from the approved budget projection of 51,089. This increase, when factored into the calculation of average daily membership (ADM) upon which State Aid is distributed, results in an increase of approximately $802,900 in those revenue accounts. In addition, State vocational equipment funding increased by $11,118. : B~~~ .~/E Title: SuDerintendent Preparer ill~. . d.D. Yes Attachments: UNo CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 2 of 3 ,,Evaluation/Analysi.~ As a result of this first quarter review, the FY2001 School Board budget is balanced. The anticipated net increase in revenue will be allocated to the Instruction ($735~213) and Pupil Transportation ($78,805) appropriation categories. The allocation to Instruction will more than offset a projected deficit of $62~800, primarily the result of unanticipated expenditures for textbooks and secondary teacher staffing, with $672,391 allocated to an instructional fund balance account for future use. The additional $11,118 of vocational equipment revenue will be allocated to the Instruction appropriation category specifically for vocational equipment. The allocation to the Pupil Transportation appropriation category will offset an over- expenditure related to the addition of seven bus driver positions. These appropriation increases require a public hearing and approval by the Board of Supervisors. CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 3 of 3 Meeting Date: January 10. 2001 Number Bud.qet and Mana.qement Comments' This request is to hold a public hearing to increase the School Board budget in the amount of $814,018. The anticipated revenue increase in the Instruction category of $735,213 will only be offset by $62,800 in projected expenditures. This will leave a total of $672,391, which will be placed in an instructional fund balance reserve account. Future use of these funds has not been determined at this time; however, this source will be available to the School Board for unanticipated needs for the remainder of this fiscal year and/or next fiscal year. This action is required as any appropriation increase above $500,000 necessitates a public hearing. Preparer= Rebecca T. Dickson Title: Director, Budget & Management PRESENT: VIRGINIA: At a regular meeting of the Chesterfield County School Board held Tuesday evening, November 14, 2000, at seven-thirty o'clock in the Public Meeting Room at the Chesterfield County Courthouse Complex Dianne E. Pettitt James R. Schroeder, DDS Elizabeth B. Davis Marshall W. Trammell, Jr. Lloyd A. Lenhart RESOLIJTION WHEREAS the results of this first quarter budget review necessitate two appropriation changes; and, WHEREAS, the School Board policy #712 and the FY2001appropriation resolution language requires School Board and Board of Supervisors approval at this level; NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that on motion of Marshall W. Trammell, Jr. seconded by Lloyd A. Lenhart, that the School Board directs the Superintendent to submit the appropriation changes approved as of this first · quarter (together with a copy of the approved first quarter budget review explaining the changes) to the County Administrator for the Board of Supervisors' approval as required. Appropriation Category Increase Instruction , $ 735,213 Transportation 78,805 $ 814,018 Patricia W. Bartlam, Clerk An Affiliate of l~ledia General Advertising Affidavit (This is not a bill. Please pay from invoice) P.O. Box 85333 Richmond, Virginia 232934)001 (804) 649~6000 ~;c'-ri-pt ion - 01/()3/200 t 121 Ad Size TAKE NOTICETAKE NOTICE THAT THE ROARD O TOO x 21 220806 0110312001 ATTACH Media General Operations, Publisher of THE RICHMOND TIMES-DiSPATCH This is to certify that the attached TAKE NtDTIC. ETAKR was published by RiChmond Newspapers, Inc. in the City of RichmOnd, Stat~ of Virginia, on the following cbt~s: 01/03/2001 The first insertion being given HERE Sworn to and subscribed before ( ~c [_ State of Virginia c,y of My commission expires THIS iS NOT A ~L. P~ASE NvOIcE. THANK YOu CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of I Meetin~l Date: January 10, 2001 Item Number: 16.B. Subject: Public Hearing to Consider the Southern Jefferson Davis Corridor Plan, an Amendment to the County's Comprehensive Plan County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: The Planning Commission and staff recommend the Board of Supervisors adopt the Southern Jefferson Davis Corridor Plan. Summary. of Information: At a public hearing on November 16, 2000, the Planning Commission recommended approval of the Southern Jefferson Davis Corridor Plan. Key recommendations of this Plan Amendment include: Encourage industrial and other employment generating uses, commercial uses and mixed use centers at appropriate locations; Encourage redevelopment of older strip commercial uses; Protect stable residential areas from commercial and industrial encroachment, and from the impacts of nearby commercial and industrial development; Protect residential uses, in areas where redevelopment is deemed appropriate, until redevelopment occurs; Improve the visual environment; Identify and protect historic and cultural resources; Improve the transportation network. A copy of the Southern Jefferson Davis Corridor Plan is attached. Prepareq _./~~~~'~ Title: Director of Planning Thomas E. Jacobson C:DATA/AGENDA/2001/JAN1001.3/GOK Attachments: Yes No THE PLAN FOR CHESTEx~ IELD The $outhern~ferson Davis Corridor Plan Southern Jefferson Davis Corridor Plan Amendment - Executive Summary The Southern Jefferson Davis Corridor study area consists of elements of the Chester Village Plan, the Southern and Western Area Plan and the Central Area Plan. At the time of the adoption of these Plans, it was assumed that in the future a more specific analysis would be performed, and resulting recommendations generated, for the Southern Jefferson Davis Corridor. Key Recommendations of the Southern Jefferson Davis Corridor Plan Industrial corridOr: Reserve and promote land between Jefferson Davis Highway and 1-95, north and south of Walthall Interchange, for industrial and other employment generating uses. Commercial uses: .Provide convenient locations for personal service and retail uses that serve local industries and their employees. Commercial uses that serve larger, regional markets may be appropriate where such uses can easily access 1-95. Mixed use centers: Encourage community-scale and neighborhood-oriented commercial uses, together with integrated office and residential uses, at identified mixed use center sites. Strip commercial corridor zoning and land uses: Encourage redevelopment of older strip commercial uses. Redevelopment should occur in a manner that improves access to area properties. Where appropriate, encourage a greater depth of development that- provides transitional uses adjacent to residential areas. Residential areas: Protect stable residential areas within, and adjacent to,' the study area from commercial and industrial encroachment, as well as from the potential adverse impacts of nearby commercial and industrial development. Residential uses in areas where redevelopment is deemed appropriate should be protected until redevelopment occurs. Visual environment: Encourage adherence to the County's Emerging Growth standards for office, commercial and industrial redevelopment and new construction throughout the entire study-area. Historic resources: Encourage the Preservation Committee to explore designating one or more of the cottage motels along Jefferson Davis Highway, together with the residences and grounds of Arrowfield Estates, as County, State and Federal historic landmarks. Encourage the Chesterfield County Preservation Committee to explore the potential for portions of the study area to qualify for State and Federal Historic District designation. jimc:\data\plans\jdplan\jdexec3.doc THE PLAN FOR CHESTERFIELD The Southern Jefferson Davis Corridor Plan Southern Jefferson Davis Corridor Plan Introduction Study Area Boundaries The Southern Jefferson Davis Corridor Plan study area is bounded by West Hundred Road (Route 10) to the north, Colonial Heights to the south and 1-95 to the east. The western boundary includes primarily parcels with orientation to Jefferson Davis Highway that back up to residential areas oriented away from Jefferson Davis Highway. In many places, natural features (streams and topography) and manmade structures (Happy Hill Road and the CSX Railroad right of way) provide a logical study area boundary. Magisterial Districts The Plan study area lies within the Bermuda and Matoaca Magisterial Districts. HoTM this Plan works The Southern Jefferson Davis Corridor Plan, once adopted by the Board of Supervisors, will become part of The Plan For Chesterfield, the CoUnty's comprehensive plan. The Plan For Chesterfield is used by 'County citizens, staff, the Planning Commission and Board of Supervisors as a guide for future decisions affecting the County including, but not limited to, decisions regarding future land use, road networks and zoning actions. Once the Southern Jefferson Davis Corridor Plan is adopted, it will amend parts of the Central Area Plan (adopted in 1996), the Chester Village Plan (adopted in 1989), the Southern and Western Area Plan (adopted in 1993) and the Thoroughfare Plan (last amended in 1999). Staff Analysis The Planning Departmem, in conjunction with other County Departments, assessed existing conditions within the study area and performed a land use analysis to anticipate development trends in the area to the year 2020. The. results were summarized and shared with public officials and interested citizens and serve as part of the basis for the following key findings and recommendations. A 5 page summary of the existing conditions assessment and the analysis to anticipate development trends is available from the Chesterfield County Planning Department (Southern Jefferson Davis Corridor - Summary of Existing Conditions and Trends). The complete texts of the assessment and analysis are also available in separate documents. These documents are entitled Southern Jefferson Davis Corridor Plan Study Area Existin~g Conditions and Issues and Southern Jefferson Davis Corridor Plan Study Area Land Use Analysis, 2000 to 2020. jimc:\data\plana\jdplan\jdPlan3f, doc ID 1 lDO} THE PLAN FOR CHESTERFIELD The Southern 'efferson Davis Corridor Plan A Plan for Action The Southern Jefferson Davis Corridor Plan should guide future development in ways that provide maximum benefits to Chesterfield County's current and future citizens, land owners, businesses and development community. Specifically, the Code of Virginia defines the primary purpose of the Comprehensive Plan as follows: To guide and accomplish a "coordinated, adjusted and harmonious .development" of County lands "which will, in accordance with present and probable future needs and resources, best promote the health, safety, morals, order, convenience, prosperity and general welfare" of County citizens. The Plan makes no attempt to determine the current or short-term marketability of any one parcel for any one use. Rather, it attempts to anticipate future needs for broad categories of uses throughout the study area for the next twenty years. In addition, the Plan does not rezone land, but serves as a guide for making decisions relative to future rezoning applications. The Plan may also suggest Ordinance amendments and other actions, such as corridor and village design studies and historic designations, which benefit the County. Finally, the Plan attempts to suggest the proper relationship of land uses to one another and to the wider community. Market forces .(availability and price of land, location, character and age of competing businesses, site specifc charac~risties such as topography and visibility from roads, etc.) would decide the desirability of a specific use on one parcel over another, as well as the timing for developing such use, based on the principle of 'highest and best use'. The zoning process would determine the appropriateness of such use on a case-by-case basis by applying principals of desirable land use development patterns embodied in the Comprehensive Plan. To this end, the Planning Department, Planning Commission and Board of Supervisors have incorporated into Plan amendments certain guidelines that promote development patterns which facilitate the orderly, harmonious, predictable and efficient use of the County's most limited resource - - the 446.5 square miles of land and water within its boundaries. These guidelines, as they apply to specific Plan areas of the County, are embodied in the Goals and Recommendations of adopted Plan amendments. jimc: \data\plans\jdplan\jdplan3 f. doc ID 2 k OO THE PLAN FOR CHESTE~2ELD The Southern Jefferson'~avis Corridor Plan Goals and Recommendations - - Southern Jefferson Davis Corridor Plan Area The Goals and Recommendations that most appropriately apply to the Southern Jefferson Davis Corridor Plan study area are: Goal 1 Promote the study area as one of the County's prime locations for.industrial and commercial development: Recommendation Continue to use the enterprise zone to encourage the development of the study area's vacant lands, as well as redevelopment of its older uses, by directing potential new commercial and industrial development to the Southern Jefferson Davis Highway Corridor and to appropriate locations within the corridor as suggested by the Plan. A Countywide pattern of orderly development directs growth to appropriate locations within existing, developed areas, such as the study area. It further encourages fringe development as an orderly extension of these developed areas. The resulting growth pattern ensures efficient use of land by decreasing sprawl, promotes cost-effective use of existing public facilities by promoting infill development and encourages economical extensions of public facilities by minimizing leapfrog development. Further, it stimulates investment and reinvestment in existing viable residential, commercial and industrial areas. This growth pattern also reduces development pressure on areas within the County where the Comprehensive Plan suggests growth should be deferred until orderly extensions of utilities are provided. Limitations and oppommities: The study area is part of the aging suburban area of the County. As such, it lost economic vitality and development potential in recent decades as the relatively undeveloped western portions of Chesterfield County became more attractive to homeowners and businesses. However, the County is coming to recognize the benefits of encouraging reinvestment in aging areas. Specifically, inf'dl development is recognized as having a revitalizing influence in such areas, as well as providing a means to encourage efficient extension and use'of public facilities. The study area is characterized by much vacant land that is already zoned for a variety of commercial and industrial uses. New road construction is enhancing access within the area, as nteell as aocess to larger markets. The study area also encompasses much of the Walthall rprise Zone which has as its objectives: increased private investment and job creation in the area; rehabilitation of the. area's existing, older commercial and industrial structures; jimc: \data\plans\jdplan\jdplan3 f. doc JD 3 ,201 THE PLAN FOR CHESTERFIELD The Southern Jefferson Davis Corridor Plan encouragement of new manufacturing and commercial uses in the area; and revitalization of the area through increased economic activity. Goal 2 Optimize economic development opportunities: The area between Jefferson Davis Highway and 1-95, north and south of the Walthall Interchange, has good access to' regional markets. 1- 95 via Walthall Interchange also provides this area with access to national and international markets through the interstate transportation sYstem, the Port of Richmond and Richmond International Airport. Therefore, this area is identified as one with potential for continued .development of industrial and other employment-generating uses, as well as commercial development that supports these uses and that serve larger markets. Vacant land in this area, as well as improved properties with potential for redevelopment, should be reserved for industrial and other employment generating uses. Commercial development serving the Walthall industrial community and larger markets would also be appropriate near the interchange. New residential development, as well as piecemeal, strip commercial development that serves smaller markets, should generally be discouraged in this area. Recommendations Reserve for industrial and other employment generating uses, and for commercial uses that serves area industries and larger, regional markets, land within the study area that the Plan suggests is appropriate for such industrial and commercial development. Through the zoning process, encourage owners of properties to aggregate acreage in a manner that provides coordinated, safe and efficient access for all parcels to the .transportation network. To this end, projects should be large enough to: provide an internal road and/or driveway network for development; provide stub roads and/or driveways to adjacent properties with development potential; and minimize the need for individual uses to have individual accesses to existing or planned major arterial and collector roads. Through the zoning process, discourage new residential development and piecemeal commercial development from locations the Plan suggests are appropriate for industrial and other employment generating uses and for commercial uses that serVe area industries and larger markets. However, increasing the depth of existing strip commercial zoning and land use along Jefferson Davis Highway may be appropriate, even in areas the Plan suggests should be reserved for industrial uses, where Such zoning action results in parcel aggregation, shared access, redevelopment of older uses, and land use' transitions between such uses and nearby residential areas. Industrial and other employment-generating uses produce tax revenues which defray the costs of providing services to County residents. By facilitating the development of such uses in jimc: \data\plans\jdplan\jdplan3 f. doc JD 4 THE PLAN FOR-CHESTERFIELD. The Southern Jefferson Davis Corridor Plan · appropriate locations, the County continues to provide quality services to its citizens. In addition, such uses provide residents with jobs both within the County and close to home, thereby reducing commuting distances, travel times, traffic congestion, air and water pollution and transportation costs. This, in mm, enhances the quality of life for working citizens and their families. Further, reducing commuting distances reduces the need for additional transportation infrastructure, as well as wear and tear on existing infrastructure. In addition, aggregation of acreage promotes development of internal transportation networks including public streets and private driveways. This, in mm, minimizes the need for direct access to Jefferson Davis Highway, as well as to other major arterial and collector roads, from individual parcels. Limitations and opportunities: Existing residential development in proximity to the Walthall Interchange, together with potential pressure for additional non-industrial development in other parts of the study area may, if not properly evaluated, limit opportunities for economic development. In addition, some properties with economic development potential may have access limitations caused by piecemeal commercial strip zoning and development patterns along Jefferson Davis Highway. However, significant opportunities exist for development of new industrial and other employment generating uses in areas where access and mitigating road improvements can be provided. Goal 3 Encourage the development of Mixed Use Centers: Two opportunity sites have been identified as having potential for a .coordinated development of office, commercial and integrated residential uses. The first opportunity site is the southwestern quadrant of a planned interchange along Jefferson Davis Highway, an area bounded by a planned limited access road to the north and fronting Jefferson Davis Highway to the east and Happy Hill' Road to the south and west. This site has the potential to support a neighborhood-oriented mixed use center. The second opportunity site is an area fronting the north and south lines of Harrowgate Road at its intersection with Jefferson Davis Highway and potentially the north and south lines of Whitehouse Road at its intersection with Jefferson Davis Highway. This site has the potential to support a community-scale mixed use center. Recommendations Through the zoning process, encourage owners of properties the Plan suggests are appropriate for mixed use centers to aggregate acreage large enough to: accommodate a mix of mutually supporting residential, office and commercial uses; improve access to major roads; provide intermediate land use transitions between higher and lower intensity uses; encourage pedestrian circulation; and facilitate consistency of design. jimc: \data\plans\jdplan\jdplan3 f. doe JD 5 ~-i]0 3 THE PLAN FOR CHESTERFIELD The Southern Jeffersoff'~avis Corridor Plan More desirable than the traditional linear 'strip commercial' pat/em of development that currently characterizes much of the study area, a pattern of strategically sized and located mixed use centers, where implemented in the County and in other jurisdictions, has proven to: minimize sprawl and the resulting inefficient use of land and public facilities; improve access to major roads, thereby assisting in minimizing traffic congestion; allow for a mix of mutually supporting residential, office and commercial uses; provide land use transitions between higher ahd lower intensity uses; encourage pedestrian circulation; and facilitate consistency of design (architecture, signage, landscaping, street lighting, etc.). In addition, mixed use centers provide business locations that can serve area residents and workers, further reducing traffic and travel times. The size, location and mix of centers should be determined in part by market area, availability · of adequate access to the transportation system, and availability and suitability of land. In general, however, neighborhood-oriented mixed use centers should be between twenty and forty acres in size and be located on one corner of the intersection of two major arterial roads or on one corner of the intersection of a major arterial road and a collector road. Community- scale mixed use centers should be between fifty and seventy-five acres, be located at the intersections of major arterial roads, and the commercial uses should be located at one corner of the intersection and be surrounded by office and residential use transitions. Limitations and opportunities: 'Existing linear zoning and land use patterns within the study area, together with the infill nature of the study and surrounding areas, may limit opportunities for development of mixed use centers. However, where possible, the nodal, mixed use center pattern of development should be encouraged. Goal 4 Encourage land use transitions: Encourage land use transitions between .less intense uses, such as residential areas, and more intense uses, such as commercial and heavier industrial areas. Recommendations Use the Plan to suggest land use transitions between residential development and commercial and heavier industrial uses. Use the Plan and zoning' process to encourage a greater depth of development that provides less intense transitional uses adjacent to residential areas. The phasing of development should require that transitional uses'be developed prior to, or in conjunction with, development of more intense land uses. jimc:\data\plans\jdplan\jdplan3f, doc JD 6 ;i]0 4: THE PLAN FOR CHESTERFIELD The Southern Jefferson Davis Corridor Plan Where land use transitions are not possible due to existing strip development patterns, use the zoning process to negotiate use restrictions and design standards, for new development and redevelopment requiring zoning action, that protect residential areas from potential adverse impacts generated: by more intense uses. Use the Plan and zoning processes to negotiate use restrictions and/or mitigating design standards on, or the rezoning to less intense land uses of, General Commercial (C-5) zoned properties lying adjacent to residential areas. Mitigating design standards could include limitations on hours of operation and lighting, orientation of buildings to provide screening and sound attenuation, etc. In this regard, encourage owners of parcels requesting zoning for additional commercial zoning in proximity to such C-5 zoned property to process rezonings for both parcels. A hierarchy of land uses, from more to less intense, provides the best protection to residential areas. Other protections (buffers, orientation of uses, and design standards which reduce nuisances such as noise, traffic and light, etc.) are supplemental mitigation to the primary protection provided by physical separation between incompatible uses, but do contribute to the overall appearance and livability of the community. Limitations and opportunities: Much of the existing land use pattern within the study area is characterized by older residential areas adjacent to older commercial strip zoning and uses. In most instances, these residential areas do not have the benefit of buffers or other mitigating design features to lessen the impact of adjacent, commercial activity. This pattern continues with new residential subdivisions in the study area. Specifically, homes in Amherst and Forest Lake Subdivisions have been built in proximity to existing commercial Uses or vacant land zoned for general commercial use. However, in many places, encouraging greater depths of non-residential zoning can afford opportunities to' provide land use transitions between more intense commercial uses and residential areas. In addition, opportunities may occur to negotiate use restrictions, design standards, and/or rezoning to less intense classifications, on C-5 zoned properties that lie adjacent to residential areas. Goal 5 Promote orderly redevelopment trends: New commercial/industrial development and redevelopment within the study area is revitalizing, and in some cases replacing, older commercial and residential uses. While these trends should be encouraged, healthy residential areas should be protected from encroachment. At the same time,, residential areas likely to experience increased pressure for redevelopment to non-residential uses, in areas where redevelopment is deemed appropriate, should be protected until redevelopment occurs. j imc: \data\plans\jdplan\j dplan3 f. doc ID 7 THE PLAN FOR CHESTERFIELD The Southern Jefferson Davis Corridor Plan Recommendations Office, commercial and/or industrial rezoning and redevelopment that has the potential to encroach on existing residential areas should be accomplished on parcels aggregated to sufficient size, design and location to protect the character and environment of the remaining residential uses. New commercial, office and/or industrial uses should not be interspersed with existing residential uses. New commercial, office and/or industrial uses should be designed to discourage increased traffic on local residential streets. The preservation, maintenance and in some cases redevelopment of older areas of the County forestalls decline and blight and contributes to the overall health .of the larger community. Specifically, healthy residential areas, if protected from piecemeal non-residential encroachment, can provide affordable housing without government subsidy, optimize the use of existing infrastructure and contribute to the County-wide goal of minimizing suburban sprawl.. Atthe same time orderly redevelopment of some residential areas, in locations where non-residential uses are deemed appropriate, promotes economic development. Limitations and opportunities: Portions of the study area have experienced redevelopment from residential to commercial and industrial uses in a piecemeal manner, allowing commercial and industrial uses to encroach into residential areas without consideration for the potential adverse impacts these non- residential uses can have on remaining nearby residences. Commercial and industrial redevelopment is expected to continue and 'will most likely exert additional pressure on residential areas located within, or in proximity to, areas that are deemed appropriate for commercial and industrial uses. Oppormrdties exist to ensure that redevelopment, where appropriate, occurs in a manner that protects the character and environment of remaining residential uses. Goal 6 Ensure that office, commercial and industrial development, when viewed from public places~ has visual appeal: New construction or redevelopment within the study area is regulated by zoning conditions and Zoning Ordinance. requirements. Specifically, new construction or redevelopment in the northern portion of the study area from West Hundred Road south to Bermuda Hundred Road, and in the southern portion of the area, from Colonial Heights north to Tinsberry Creek, is subject to Post Development Area standards, while new construction and redevelopment in the remainder of the corridor is subject to the higher, Emerging Growth standards. These standards address access, parking, landscaping, architectural treatment, jimc :\data\plans\jdplan\jdplark3 f. doc JD 8 '~.~,( "'~' ~ ' THE PLAN FOR CHESTERFIELD The Southern Jefferson ZJavis Corridor Plan setbacks, signs, buffers, utilities and screening of dumpsters and loading areas. In particular, the Post Development Areas reflect existing and often older commercial zoning and land use, holding new construction and redevelopment in these areas to a lesser standard. The Emerging 'Growth Area reflects the potential for significant new development and holds such d~velopment to higher standards. Recommendation Through the zoning process, encourage adherence to Emerging Growth development standards for new office, commercial and 'industrial construction and redevelopment throughout the study area. Adherence to Emerging Growth development standards better ensures that new development and redevelopment within the study area has visual appeal. In particular, in recent years new development or redevelopment in the northernmost portion of the study area (a Post Development Area) has been held through zoning actions to higher design standards, resulting in a more visually pleasing environment than would have occurred under Post Development Area standards alone. Encouraging adherence to Emerging Growth standards in areas currently under Zoning Ordinance Post Development standards, as opposed to mending the Zoning Ordinance to require Emerging Growth standards, would continue this process without making existing development non-conforming. Limitations and opportunities: Many older commemial uses within the study area were developed prior to adoption of current Zoning Ordinance development standards. However, as noted herein, new commercial and industrial development and redevelopment within the study area is. revitalizing, and in some cases replacing, older uses.. The County recognizes that new construction and redevelopment should adhere to design guidelines which ensure these uses, when viewed from public places (such as along roads), have visual appeal. In this manner, new construction and redevelopment will contribute to the overall appearance and livability of the community, making surrounding properties more desirable for development and existing residential areas more attractive as places to live. In recent years new development or redevelopment in the northernmost portion of the study area (a Post Development Area) has been held through zoning actions to higher standards. This trend should be encouraged. Goal 7 Protect and preserve historic and cultural.resources: Sites with the study area may potentially have significant historic or cultural significance. These include the cottage motels, at various locations on the east and west lines of Jefferson Davis Highway, and Arrowfield Estates, a cluster of residences located along the north side of Arrowfield Road, east of Jefferson Davis Highway. jimc: \data\plans\j dplan\jdplan3 f. doc JD 9 ;-~07 THE PLAN FOR CHESTERFIELD The Southern Jefferson Davis Corridor Plan Recommendations Encourage the Chesterfield County Preservation Committee to work with the property owner(s) of one or more of the cottage motels to have the property designated as a County, State and Federal historic landmark, a culturally and eventually historically significant reminder of the age of motoring in America that predated the high speed, limited access, interstate highway system. Encourage the Chesterfield County Preservation Committee to work with the property owner(s) of Arrowfield Estates to determine if this property should be designated as a County, State and Federal historic landmark. · Encourage the Chesterfield County Preservation Committee to explore the potential for portions of the study area to qualify for State and Federal Historic District designation. Encourage the preservation of designated structures and/or sites by allowing adaptive reuse that is compatible with existing or anticipated development in the area. Comprehensive Plan amendments attempt to identify structures and sites within study area boundaries that have historic or cultural significance. Protection of such structures and sites offer the best opportunities for presenting and interpreting the County's historic 'and cultural heritage. Adapting these structures and sites to appropriate alternate uses further contributes to ensuring their preservation and maintenance. Limitations and opportunities: Jefferson Davis Highway has a long history as a major transportation corridor; however, few structures or sites of historic and/or cultural significance survive within the stUdy area.. This can be attributed, in part, to the lack of interest in historic preservation in the past which led to destruction of structures and loss of sites from neglect and redevelopment of properties. Very little thought has been given to the preservation of twentieth century sites and structures in Chesterfield County; however, it is conceivable that, as time passes, the cottage motels along Jefferson Davis Highway may become culturally and eventually historically significant reminders of the age of motoring in America that predated the high speed, limited access, interstate highway system. In addition, the residences and grounds of Arrowfield Estates may have historic and/or cultural significance, based on conversations with, and preliminary data provided by, the current property owner which indicates the structures may date to the mid- nineteenth century. Given the well maintained condition of this property and its potential for adaptive reuse, further research into the historical and/or cultural significance of this property is merited. jimc: \data\plans\jdplan\j dplan3 f. doe ID 10 THE PLAN FOR CHESTERFIELD The Southern Jefferson.Davis Corridor Plan Goal 8 Improve the transportation network: As development occurs, provide safe 'and efficient roadways and supporting transportation facilities to mitigate the traffic impact of such development. Recommendations --Amend the Thoroughfare Plan to include the following: 1) identify Walthall Industrial Parkway as a sixty (60) foot collector and; 2) include a proposed sixty (60) foot wide collector from Pine Forest Drive to Walthall Industrial Parkway. An adequate transportation network helps achieve the goal of optimizing economic development by ensuring that roads accommodate the free flow of traffic and provide safe and. efficient access to the regional transportation network. The Thoroughfare Plan identifies the need to improve existing roads, as well as .construct new rOads to accommodate growth. Improvements to existing roads, as well as new road construction, generally include right-of-way dedication, pavement widening, horizontal and vertical alignment improvements, ditch relocation to provide adequate shoulders, and utilities adjustment and/or relocation. Limitations and opportunities Access limitations exist within the study area. In particular, primary access for future development in the southwest quadrant of 1-95 and Route 10 (West Hundred Road), north of John Tyler Community College, may be limited to one intersection along Jefferson Davis Highway, at Weir Road. The capacity of this intersection will determine the development potential of properties in this area. In addition, a public road connection may be needed between Harrowgate Road and Whitehouse Road in order to adequately accommodate traffic generated by future development in the vicinity of the Harrowgate Road/Jefferson Davis Highway intersection. Finally, existing roads throughout the study area need to be improved and new roads constructed to accomm~ new development. However, planned transportation improvements are providing portions of the study area with better access to 1-95. Better access to 1-95 will enhance the area's ability to serve regional markets, as well as national and international markets via the Port of Richmond and Richmond International' Airport. In addition, the Zoning Ordinance requires a coordinated transportation management plan for proposed development to include supporting traffic analysis to identify mitigating road improvements for requested densities to achieve an acceptable level of service. As development in this area continues, additional opportunities to improve ac. cx~s should occur as zoning, mbdivision and site plan actions implement the goals of the Plan. jimc:\data\plans\jdplan\jdplan3f, doc m 11 ;,.'_.[iD THE PLAN FOR CHESTERFIELD .The Southern Jefferson Davis Corridor Plan An opporUmity to provide additional public road access, via a new collector road, has been identified in the southern portion of the study area. This collector road would improve access for existing residential area~, to include Millside Subdivision, as well for area industrial uses. Development proposals in this area should include the dedication of right-of-way and eonsmaefion of any section of this collector road that is located within the property boundaries of the proposed use. jimc: \data\planS\jdplan\jdplan3 f. doc .ID 12 THE PLAN FOR CHESTERFIELD The Southern Jefferson Davis Corridor Plan Land Use Categories Residential (2.51 to 4.0 dwellings per acre) Residences, and under circumstances that ensure compatibility with existing and/or anticipated area residential development, places of worship, schools, parks and other similar public and semi-public facilities. Residential (4.01 to 7.0 dwellings per acre) Residences, and under circumstances that ensure compatibility with existing and/or anticipated area residential development, places of worship, schools, parks and other similar public and semi-public facilities. Neighborhood Mixed Use ~ Neighborhood-oriented commercial uses, including small shopping centers, service and office uses that serve neighborhood-wide trade areas. C-2 Community Commercial/Mixed Use Corridor Community-sCale commercial uses, including shopping centers, service and office uses that serves community-wide trade areas. Residential uses of various types and densities may be appropriate if part of a larger mixed use project and the design is integrated with other uses. C-3 Commercial General commercial uses, including automobile-oriented uses and light industrial uses. Residential uses of various types and densities may be appropriate if part of a larger mixed use project and the design is integrated with other uses. C-5 Light Industry Offices, warehouses and light industrial uses, including research and developmem uses and light manufacturing dependent upon raw materials first processed elsewhere. Moderate industrial uses may be appropriate when designed, located and/or oriented to ensure compatibility with less intense uses, and where appropriate access and transitions are provided. Retail and service uses that serve primarily surrounding permitted uses may be appropriate when part of a larger development. I-1 and I-2 Industrial Manufacturing uses processing raw materials, heavy warehousing and trucking terminals. Retail and service uses that serve primarily surrounding permitted uses may be appropriate when part of a larger development. Heavy industrial uses should be located and designed to mininaize impacts on existing and anticipated area developmem of lesser intensity. I-2 and I- 3 jimc: \data\plans\jdplan\jdplan3f. doc YD 13 Southern Jefferson Javis Corridor Land Use and Trans Plan is .~:fer to -'-~-, ~/~o~ villa~ e Plan' .to & Weste~.-., Refer to, Ruffin 'Mill and should be confirmed with alignments should be verified COlonial Heights 2 Miles An Affiliate of Media General Advertising Affidavit (This is not a bill Please pay from invoice) P.O. Box 85333 Richmond, Virginia 23293-000J (804) 649-6000 ATTN LISA P © ROX 40 i-'-Accou Date Code ............... priori Ad Size 0110~f2.001 121 TAKE '{OTICF, TAKF, NOTICE THAT THE RC)ARD C) 2 00 x 35.00 Media General Operations, Publisher of THE RICHMOND TIMES-DISPATCH This is to certify that the attached TA-~R NOTI~ETA~'F, was published by Richmond Newspapers, inc. in the City of Richmond, state of Virginia, on the folloWing ~ates: 12/27/2000 01/03/2001 nd subscribed before CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Meeting Date: January 10, 2001 Item Number: 16.C. Subject: PUBLIC HEARING: Ordinance to Vacate a Fifty Foot Right of Way Known as Treport Road and Fifteen Foot Temporary Construction Easements Within Salisbury Heathland Section A County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requestsd: Adopt an ordinance to vacate a 50' right of way known as Treport Road between Lot 1, Block C and Lot 16, Block B, and 15' temporary construction easements within Salisbury Heathland - Section A. Summary of Information: Frederick M. Cozad and Linda W. Cozad requested the vacation of a 50' right of way known as Treport Road between Lot 1, Block C and Lot 16, Block B, and 15' temporary construction easements within Salisbury Heathland - Section A. On November 8, 2000 and December 20, 2000, the Board of Supervisors continued the public hearing because of issues relating to access to an adjoining residential development. Use of Treport Road to access the adjoining property is prohibited by zoning. If vacated, a 20' drainage easement will be retained. District: Midlothian Preparer: Jc~nhn W~. H~ar~~ Title:Right of Way Manaqer Attachments: Yes -~No VICINITY SKETCH ORDINANCE TO VACATE A FIFTY FOOT RIGHT OF WAY KNOWN AS TREPORT ROAD AND FIFTEEN FOOT TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENTS WITHIN SALISBURY HEATItLAND - SECTION A OANHU R~T WOODS .t '1 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page I of I Meeting Date: January 10, 2001 Item Number: 16.D. Subject: PUBLIC HEARING: Ordinance to Vacate a Portion of a Sixteen Foot Drainage Easement on Lot 27, Block K, Roxshire, Section 10 County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors adopt an ordinance to vacate a portion of a 16' drainage easement on Lot 27, Block K, Roxshire, Section 10. Summary of Information: Robert J. Davison has submitted an application requesting the vacation of a portion of a 16' drainage easement on Lot 27, Block K, Roxshire, Section 10. This request has been reviewed by staff and approval is recommended. District: Midlothian Preparer: ~o~n w~,Harmon '~j' ~"-~ Title:Riqht of Way Manaqer Attachments: No VICINITY SKETC Ordinance to Vacate a Portion of a 16' on Lot 27, Block K, Roxshire, Drainage Easement Section 10 ~LN OLDE STONI cP,~ SILB~ CR OLDE RADNOR FORES'i' LU SWAN'H ~ c~, CT N Chesterfield County Department of Utilities Right Of Way Office 12,'14/00 11;43 FAX 8045593416 CbYAL~,EB THiS IS 'TO CERTIFY THAT ON 1.,_2-5=.00~ )1 MADE ~ ACCURAT~ FIE. LO SURVEY · OF TH[ PROPERTY AS SHOWN HEREON; THAT ALL IMPROVEMENTS AND VISIBLE EVIDENCE OF F...,IE~EMENTS ARE SHOWN HER[ON; THAT THERE ARE NO ENCROACHMENTS UPON A(~X~OIRING 'PROPERTY, OTHER THAN 'AS SHOWN HEREuN; *~ TO THE · CURRENT F~MA FLOOD RATE MAPS THIS PROPERTY IS LOCATED WITHIN ZONE ~ PORTION OF '16' DRAINAGE EASEMENT TO BE THIS ~LI~ WA~ PREPARED WITHOUT THE OWNER: EOB[ET d. & HELEN P. DAVIII~5ON DB 1969 PG 1612 TAX MAP NO. 753-715-9905-00000 PUR: MARK W. & HELEN K. PATTERSON BENEFIT OF A TITLE REPORT. LOT 16 ,,, LOT 27 x.__.._.~x GARAOE CORNER ENCROACHE.i; INTO EASEMENT AS SHOWN ! \CO~CR[r[ NO.' 2.2Ot LOT 19 COR ON LINE 16' SEWER / v,~.~.[/ / 002 / / LOT ?.8 16' EASEMENT \ \ R=50.O0' L-'54.2¢' SWANHURST DRIVE 50' R/W / / / / / / / / 506.05' TO $/L EDGEY1EW LA EXTD LOT 26 'PHYSICAL SURVEY" PLAT SHOWING IMPROVEMENTS ON LOT 27 BLOCK K SECTION 10 ROY, SHIRE LOCATED IN THE MIDLOTHIAN DISTRICT OF CHESTERFIELD COUNTY, VIRGINIA SCALE 1' =.40' JN 4785 WATSON & ASSOCiATe-S,, t~.C. 422~ 80NNIE BANK ROAD RICHMOND VIRGINIA 804-271-8038 DATE: 12-5-00 FILE: CSM-4-581 ~n Affiliate of Media Oeneral Adve~ising Affidavit (This is not a bill. Please pay from invoice) ~HF,~TRRFII,D C~ RIGHT WAY ~IGHT OF WAY DEPT 6710 W KRAIIgE ROAD CHERTRRFIEI,D VA 23832 'Date Code P.O. Box 85333 Richmond, Virginia 23293-0001 (804) 649-6000 Description Ad Size IAccount Num. 2206R6 Date J 103/2001 Total Cost 01/03/2001 121 TAKE NOTICETHAT ON JANI IARY 10 2001 AT 70 ZOO x 17.00 327.76 ATTACH TAKE NOTICE: That on January 10, 2001, at 7:00 p.m. or as soon thereafter as maybe heard the Board of Supervisors of Chestedield Coun~ at ~s regular meeting place n the Board Room of Chesterfield County/Virginia, will consider the follow ng ordinance for adop- tion AN ORDINANCE to vacate a portion of a 16' drainage easement on Lot 27, Block K, R0xshire,Se~tion 10 as shown on aplat by JORDAN CONSULTING ENGINEERS, P'.C. dated DECEMBER 4, 1987, and recorded in the Clerk's Office, ~rcuit COurt, Ches- tle6.dield County, Virginia in Deed Book 60, at Pages 14, 15 and The complete text of the proposed ordinance and conveyance is ox filedin the office of the Right of Way Manager in Chester. i field County, Virginia and may be examined b~ all interested l parties between lhe hOurS of 8':30 a.m. and 5:0dp.m., Monday/ through Friday, ' HERE Media General Operations, Inc. Publisher of THE RICHMOND TIMES-DISPATCH This is to certify that the attached TAKE NOTICETHAT ON JAN was published by Richmond Newspapers, Inc. in the City of Richmond, State of Virginia, on the following dates: 12/27/2000 01/03/2001 The first insertion being given .... 12/27/2000 Sworn to and subscribed before me this ~ ~- d::i '- C:! [ JAN i 6 200i R""' SECT Notary Public .... '- ~uPervi~or ~d State of Virginia City of Richmond My Commission expires THIS IS NOT A BILL, PLEASE PAY FROM INVOICE. THANK YOU CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Meeting Date: January 10, 2001 Item Number: 16.E. Subject: PUBLIC HEARING: To Consider the Conveyance of Right of Way and Easements along Dundas and Strathmore Roads County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Staff requests that the Board of Supervisors approve the conveyance of a parcel of land containing 0.488 acres and temporary construction easement to the Virginia Department of Transportation, and an easement to Virginia Power, and authorize the Chairman of the Board and the County Administrator to execute the deed and easement agreement. Summary of Information: The right of way and easements at Bensley Elementary School are needed for improvements to the intersection of Dundas and Strathmore Roads. Staff has reviewed this request and recommends that the Board of Supervisors approve the conveyance. District: Bermuda John W. Harmon Title:Riqht of Way Manager Attachments: Yes No '"VICINITY SKETCK' PUBLIC HEARING: To Consider the Conveyance of Right of Way and Easements along Dundas Road and Strathmore Road DR DR IBAL CT LN ~ M~ADoI~'~O STANWIX LN STA NNN\'/- O_.A mr_ PARKDALE CT O/,, :~3\0 E DR BENSL 'URNE R~ RD ~KDALE Chesterfield County Department of Utilities Right Of Way Office i/ ! An ,affiliate of Media General AdvertisinD Affidavit (This is not a bill. Please pay from invoice) CHE,qTERFIT,D CC) RIGHT WAY' RIGHT OF WAY DEPT 6710 W KRATTRE ROAD CHF, STF, R FTF, I ,D VA 23832 P.O. Box 85333 Richmond, Virginia 23293~001 (804) 649-6000 I Account Num. 220686 Date 01103/2001 Date Code Description Ad Size Total Cost 01/03/2001 121 TAKE NOTTC, ETHAT ON JANIIARY 10 2001 AT 70 2_00 x 13.00 125.32 ATTACH TAKE NOTICE: That on Janu~m/! 0~ 2001, at 7i00 p.~rn, or as Sbon thereafter as a?l~be h .ear0, th~.eoat~ of .Sup. erv_lsors.o.f Ch~eld COUnty as ~eguar meeting place In the l~atd ~rn o~ Ch~dt01d County, ~blJa, .will ~onskler the coBveyanee Of a ParCo of La. nd and ~mants for road IrnPr0veme~ to DUddas and ~'a~amrnore Roads, Bermuda Dlstrict,'~erfleld County, Vir, lnla: . : ~ more ~lar deSorlptlon of the Pamol t6 bo qonVoyed and further infofmatbn iS On file in the offlco~0ftheRigfit of WaY Ean, al]or in ~estorfie.fd C. Ounty. Vi[glnlai/~nd may 5e examined by a, ict? parers between fie hours of 8:30 aJn. and 5:00 .~_.m~2M0noay through Fri.daY: HERE Media General Operations, Inc. Publisher of THE RICHMOND TIMES-DISPATCH This is to certify that the attached TAKE NOTTC, F,,THAT ON .TAN was published by Richmond Newspapers, Inc. in the City of Richmond, State of Virginia, on the following dates: 01/03/2001 RECEIVE CHESTERFIE! The first insertion being given .... · 01/03/200'1 JAN 162 UTILITIES [q.~.~ Sworn to and subscribed before me this Notary Public State of Virginia City of Richmond My Commission expires Supervisor L) THIS IS NOT A BILL. PLEASE PAY FROM INVOICE. THANK YOU CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Meeting Date: January 10, 2001 Item Number: 17. Su~ect: Adjournment and Notice of Next of Supervisors County Administrator's Commen~: Scheduled Meeting of the Board County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Summary of Information: Motion of ad~journment and notice of next scheduled meeting on January 2001, at e~.-00 p.m. 24:, Preparer: ~c~aO-- ~~ Title: Lisa H. Elko Attachments' --~ Yes No Clerk to the Board