78S174STAFF REPORT
DATE:
~t~er--~-l-~7~-~-~C-)-
-~~~q~-{~-~t~
December 13, 1978 (BS)
APPLICANT & CASE NUMBER: SAMUEL H. WEST - 78S174
REQUEST: Rezoninq from Residential (R-7) to Office Business (O)
plus'Conditional Use for Planned Development. Applicant plans to
construct building for professional offices.
GENERAL LOCATION: Bermuda Magisterial District; property fronts
north line of W. Hundred Road and located approx. 270 ft. east of
its intersection with Ecoff Ave. TM 115-6 (6) Nunnally's Addition
Lot 18 (Shee~ 32).
SUBJECT PARCEL: .75 acres, zoned Res (R-7). Residential use.
ADJACENT PROP.ERTY:
use.
Zoned Res (R-7) and Off Bus (O). Residential
UTILITIES, SOILS, DRAINAGE AND EROSION, EASEMENTS:
and sewer available to serve property.
Public water
Soils are sandy loam, gently sloping to sloping and under present
conditions, have only slight chance for erosion. Soils are well
suited for proposed use.
Parcel lies in Great Branch drainage area. Prior to clearing or
construction, site plan and erosion control plan must be approved
by County.
PUBLIC FACILITIES: Property will be served by Chester Fire
Station, Company Number 1. Fire service capability adequate to
serve property.
TRANSPORTATION AND TRAFFIC: Vehicular movements will be distributed
over W. Hundred Road which is adjacent to property and in good
condition.
LAND ASSESSMENT: Appraised value - $28,900. Use should not
have adverse effect on adjacent and area property value.
GERNERAL PLAN: Commercial use.
DISCUSSION: Applicant has entered into real estate purchase
contract with Clara Mitchell, property owner. Applicant
requests rezoning from Residential ~R-7) to Office Business (O)
plus Conditional Use for Planned Development. He plans to construct
building for professional offices. See attached site plan.
The applicant met with Staff to review intended development of the
parcel in question. It was determined that because of the size
and the shape of the parcel, it will be difficult to accommodate
the intended use without variation or exception to the bulk require-
ment applicable in a commercial zone. As a result, the applicant
has requested that consideration of his current application be
deferred to the November 21, 1978 Planning Commission meeting so
that the request might be amended to seek rezoning to Office
Business (O) instead of the originally requested Convenience
Business (B-l). In addition, the amended application will also
request a Conditional Use Planned Development for exceptions to
certain bulk requirements.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
1978 MEETING.
RECOMMEND DEFERRAL TO THE NOVEMBER 21,
CASE HISTORY
CPC
10 17 78:
AT THE REQUEST OF THE APPLICANT, THE COMMISSION DEFERRED
THIS REQUEST 30 DAYS SO THAT THE APPLICANT COULD AMEND
HIS APPLICATION TO REQUEST A CONDITIONAL USE FOR PLANNED
DEVELOPMENT.
Staff has received an amended site plan depicting the proposed
parking and building layout. After further study, Staff recommends
approval of rezoning to the Office Business (O) classification
with a Conditional Use Planned Development subject to the imposition
of the following conditions:
1. The plan prepared by Robert L. Borum, dated October 18, 1978,
shall be considered the plan of development as well as the Master
Plan.
2. The Commission upon approval of this request shall also grant
schema=lc approval of the site plan dated October 18, 1978.
3. Forty-five (45) feet of right-of-way from the centerline of
Route 10 shall be dedicated to and for Chesterfield County, free and
unrestricted. This dedication shall be accomplished
prior to the release of any building permit.
4. The uses permitted shall be limited to those under the Office
Business (O) District. Specifically, business, governmennal or
professional offices, libraries, medical clinics and pharmacies
(drug stores) provided they are located within the same building
or structure housing medical offices or clinics.
-2-
5. The applicant shall be granted the following exceptions to the
bulk requirements:
a. A fifteen (15) foot exception to the twenty (20) foot side
yard building setback requirement, adjacent to the eastern property
line.
b. A twenty (20) foot exception to the fifty (50) foot building
setback requirement from major arterials (Route 10).
c. An exception to the requirement that the parking area be
screened from the property located to the west (Coon's property).
6. A six (6) foot high solid board fence Or vegetative screen shall
be constructed/planted along the northern and eastern property lines
~adjacent to all parking areas.
7. Prior to the release of any building permits, detailed site plans
shall be submitted to the Division of Development Review for
approval.
8. In conjunction with final site plan review, a landscaping plan
shall be submitted to the Division of Development Review for approval.
9. The above noted conditions notwithstanding, all bulk requirements
of the Office Business (0) District shall be applicable.
CPC 11 21 78
CASE HISTORY
Recommended approval of Office Business (O) rezoning
and a Conditional Use for Planned Development subject
to imposition of Conditions ~1 thru ~9 as stated
above.
The Board of Supervisors, on Wednesday, December 13, 1978, be-
ginning at 2:00 p.m. will take under consideration this request
for zoning.
-3-
'i
i
o
WF'$T ~ ~ (OTATE. HwY ~ ~ I0) .
,!