05SN0185-May25.pdf Os.-cpc-
M. ay 25, 2005 BS
STAFF' S
R.EQUEST ANALY SiS
AND
REC. OMMENDATION
05SN'0185
Conlmercial Lm~d Development
_Midlothian Magismriai District
Southwest quadrant of Mi dloth i an Turnpike and Otterdale Road
.RE.(. UES I:
Rezoning from Agricultural (A)to General industrial (t-2) with Conditional Use to
permi~ commercial uses plus Conditional Use Pl. am~ed Devclopmcm to permit
cxception.s to Ordinance requirements.
PR_OPO~_ ED LAND USE:
A mixture oflight industrial and commercial uses, a~s outlined in Proffer'cA Conditkm
2 are planned.
:PI...A.~'I.N'("~ COMMTSSTON RECOMMENDA-HO'N
RECOMMEND DENIAL.
Messrs. Litton, Wilson, Gecker and Gul.ley
AYES:
i A. 5:
Mr, Bass
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Recommend approval subjec, r to motor vehicle washes not being accepted a~s a pem,.itted usc wflhin
thc area designated as "commercial" on the Master Plan. This recommendation is made for 1he
tbtlowing reason:
Except for the proposed motor vehicle wash use ('Proffered Condition ,.,A. 10. i, ti~e proposed
zoning and land risc comptics with thc Route 288 Corridor Pbm which suggests the request
Pre. riding a FIRS"i Ct lC)ICI;, commmxitv through excelle2ce m p,ablic sex'vice
property is appropriate l'br light industrial/flex use. The Plan fl:u'ther provides tlc.at under
certain circumstances, supporting small scale retail, uses incorporated in.to a larger
development ma5' be appropriate.
(NOTE: CO'ND1TIONS MAY BE IMPOSED OR THE PROPERTY OWNER(S) MAY
PROFFER CONDITIONS. THE CONDI"I1ONS NOTED WITH "STAFF/CPC" WERE AGt¢}!.ED
UPON BY BOTH STAFF AND THE COMMISSION. CONDITIONS WITH ONLY A "STAFF"
ARE RECOMMENDED SOLELY BY STAFF. CONDITIONS WITH ONLY A "CPC" ARE
AI-)'DITIONAL C{)NDITIONS RECOMMENDED BY TIlE PLANNING COMMISSION.)
CONDITION
Setbacks shall conform to setback, requirements for Light Industr/at (I-!7) Districts in
Emerging Growth District ~Xreas, except that:
For the portion of the request property adjacent to Tax IDs 721-708-2383 and 721 -
709-7'721., setbacks shall, be based upon requirements as i.f such. ad. jacen.t parcels are
zoned ibr industrial use. (P)
PROFFERED (70ND1-TIONS
The property o~q~ers and applicant i.a this rezoning case, pm'suant to Section. 15.2-2298 of the Code
o£Virginia (1950 as amended) and the Zoning Ordinance of Chesterfield (7:oumy, for themselves and
their successors or assigms, profl'er that the property under consideration wilt be developed a.ccording
to ~t~c l'bll.owing proilk:rs i'f'; and only il} thc rezoning rcqttcst submitted herewith is granted with only
those conditions agreed to by the owners and applicant. In thc event this request is denied or
approved with conditions not agreed to by the owed.ers and applicant, the proffbrs shall inm~cdiately
be null and vtfid anti of no further lbrce or effect.
1.
Master Plan/Master Road PI~n. The zoning ~nap prepared by AES Consulting
Engineers, dated March 4~ 2005 entitled "Commerce Place M.i. dfotlfim~ Turnpike (Rt.
60) & Route 288 Zoning Bubble Map" shall be considered the .:M'a. ster ['lmm. The
transportation map prepared by AES Constdting Engineers dated March 4, 2005
entitled "Commerce Place (Route 60) &Routc 288 Master Road Plan" shall be
considered the Master Road Plan. (P)
Permitted Uses.
In that area designated as ~'Commercial" on the Master Plan, tlne following
· uses shall bc permitted:
i. uses pertained by-right or u,ith restrictions in the Light Industrial IiI- 1)
District;
2. uses permitted by-right or with restrictions in the Conveaie.nce
Busirmss (C-l) District;
'3. mxist matm%l and supply stores;
2 ~5$ N0t 85-._M2'~_Y25 BOS
service a~id rcla[ed
6.
7.
8.
9.
12.
O.
electrical, plumbing or heating supply sales,
display rooms;
evewear sales and services;
hcalth clubs;
hotels;
locksmith operations;
messenger or telegraph, sen, ices;
motor vehicle washes;
office supply sm.rcs;
photography studios: and
restaurants, to include carry~out and fas't-food.
in that area designated as "'induslriaI" on the Master 'Plan, the tbftowmg usc~
shall bc permitted:
8.
9.
10.
uscs permitted by-right in the Light Industrial (I~ I ) District:
contractor's offices, simps and rc. latcd display rooms;
electrical, plumbing or heath~g supply salcs~ service and. related
display rooms;
health clubs;
hotels;
ice manufacturing;
locksmith operations;
mass transportation;
sat. efli.te dishes, providcd that:
a. tile dishes m'e accessory to a. priucipaI use, and
b. the diameter of'the dish does not exceed twelve (12) ibet; and
sctmols -commercial, trade, business~ vocational and training. (P)
Phasin~ of Commercial Dcvelo~ment. Prior to issuance of any certificate of
occnpancy Ibr any nsc i.~x fl.~at area desig~mted as ;'Conm'tcrcial" on the Master Ptar~, at
least temporaD' certificates of occupancy shall have been granied Ibr at least 40,000
square flzet o.f gross floor area of Light Industrial (I-1) uses identified in Proffered
Condition 2.B. 1. in that area designated as ~q.ndustrial" on the Master iPian. (P)
8 tel
For areas that drain, thrm~gh a. regional B_MP, lemporary basins shall remain in
place ancb'or new BMPs consn'ucted to achieve the .45 phosphorus standard
until the downstream regional BMP into which the development will drain
has beer~ cor:structcd.
For areas thai do not drain through a regional BMP, temporary basins shati
rema.i~ in place and/or new BMPs constructed to achieve the .45 phosphorus
standard until Chesterfield Count' obtains its initial permit far
implemcntatimx of thc Upper Swift Crock Watershed Plm~.
05SN0 t 854VIAY25-B()S
Tiznbennm With the exception of timbering to remove dca(t, dise.ased or dying 1roes
which bas been approved by the Virginia State Department of Forestry, there shall be
no timbering until a. lm~d disturbance permit has been obtained from 1h.c
Environmental Engineering Depm'tment and the approved devices installed. (EE)
Sidewalks. Sidew~ks shall be consm~cted on the, Property on the west side of
O1terdalc Woods Road and both sides of the East~'West Special Access Road Ibr the
entire length of the sub. iect properties a4jacent to such roads. The exact .location and
design of these improvements shatl be deternfined by the Transportation m~d
Planning Departments. (P & T)
...E_'-;~k!'.?~:~g.;6jL~peciat Access Road. Prior to any final site plan approval, up to ninety
(90) tbet of right-ot'~way (as detem~ined by the Transportation Department) through
the property for au East/West Special Access Road shall be dedicated,, free and
unrestricted, to and for the benefit of Chesterfield County. This right-of-way shall be
located as substantially shown on the Master Road Plan. Thc exact location of this
right-of-way shall be approved by the Transportation Department. A ten (I0) foot
landscape strip shall bc prey']dod on both sides of the East,"West Special Access
Road. which strip may include access drives, utilities tu~d signag¢. (T)
Route 60 Access. No direct access shall bc provided fi'om the propers' to Route 60.
Prior to any site plan. approval, m~ access plan for thc East/West Special Access Road
shall be submitted to and approved by the Transportation Department. Access li~om
the Property to tt~c East/West Special Access Road shall conform to. the approved
access plm~. (T)
-I'ransportation Improvements. To provide an adcq't~atc roadway system, the
developer shall be responsible for the following:
Conslruction of additional pavement along the eastbound lames o£Route 60 at
the Otterdale Road intersection to provide a separate right mm lane;
Construction of additional pavement along the westbound lanes of Rot:.tc 60
to provide adequate dtml 1.cfi turn lanes, as detemfined by the 7D'anspo~"tarion
Depmlment, at the existing Route 60/Otterdale Road crossover;
Full cost of traffic signal modification at the Otterdale Road/Route 60
intersection;
Construction o£a six (6) lane divided typical section (i.e. two (2) southbound
lanes and :[~our O) northboand lanes) tbr the Ea_st/'West Special Access Road
at i-m intersection with Roule 60, including relocation el" Otterdale Woods
Road as substantially shox~m on the Master Road Plan. The exact location
and design of these improvements shall bc approved by the Transport. mien
Department;
05SN0185..MA¥25..I~()S
Construction oi'tbur (4) lanes of the East/West Special Access Road through
thc property to VDOT Urban Minor Arterial standards (40 mph) as
substaniialty shown on thc Master Road Plan. The exact locati, on and dcsi~
of this improvement shall be approved by lhe Transportation Departme~.l';
Construction of additional pavement Io provide separate left and right turn.
lm~cs l¥om the East/West Special Access Road to Commerce Place.~ and a
three (3) la.ne typical scclio~ (i.e., two (2) outbound and one (1)
on Commerce Place ar its i~tersection with the East/West Special Access
Road, as determined by the Trm~sporta.tion Department.;
Full cost of traffic signalizmion? if warran!ed as determined by the
Transportation Department, of the intersection of Commerce Place with. the
East/West Special Access Road; and
}:t.
Dedication to Chesterfield County, free and unmstrJ, ctcd? of any 'additional
right-of-way (or easements) required lbr the improvements identified above.
Phashm Plan. Prior to any' llnaI site plan approval, a phasing ptm~ for the required
road imp;'o,~ments as idenlificd herein, sh;dl be submitted m and approved by the
Transt'~rtarion Department. (T)
G'EN EIL,~.L INFORMATION
I,ocaLioB:
South line ot'Midlothian Turnpike, west line of Otterdale Road, and local, ed in. lite southwest
q~.l.adl'm~t of the intersection of these roads. Tax IDs 720-70%6011 and 721-709-2704 and
~.~40 (Sheet 5).
Exi.sti~:
A
Size:
35.1 acres
Ex'isfi~e [,and Use:
Vacallt
5 055N D'185-MA 3:;25-..BC)S
.Adiacen.t Zoning4 and ~md Use:
North
South
East
West
'[-[ and R-9 with Conditional Use Planned Development, Industrial, Multilhmily
Residential or vacant
A.; Southc.m Railroad
A with Conditional Use and A; residential
A; vacm~t
UTILITIES
Publ.ic Water System:
There is an existing twenty-four (24) inch. water tine extendi:i~g along Midlothian Tu.mpike,
adjacent to thc request site. In addition, a sixteen (1611 inch water line extends al.ong
...~tc ~s located within thc botmdaries of the Route 288 Corridor
Otterdale Road. The request s' ~'
Pl~.a_n_...and as such, use of the .public water system is required by County Code.
Public ~¥ astex~ a~er System.:
The request site is located within the bom~dmTies of the Rt. 288 Corridor Plan m~d as such,
use of thc public wastewater system is required by CounD' Code. The req~est site is within
lhe Tomahawk Creek drainage basin. The existing thirty-six (36) inch Tomahawk Creek
n-unk currently terminates approximately 4.5 miles southwest of the request site. The
extension of that trunk would be the natural and planned source of wastcwatcr service to this
site. However, the applicant has requested ~hat the Utilities I)epamne:t~.t consider ali
altema.1ive source that would extend service across Midlothian Turnpike from the existing
eighteen (1.811 inch M'ichaux Creek mink, Inca.ted adjacent to tt~c Salisbury and Rosemom
subdivisions. 'i2~e applicant has submitted a demi'led engineering study, and obtained vcrb'A
concurrence Imm property owners immediately east and west of the request. The wastcwater
line extension as proposed '~,,wuld have the depth and capacity to serve all of the prapellb,'
bounded by Midlothian Turnpike, Rt. 288. and thc Norfolk-Southem Railroad right-of-was;
which is approximately seventy-five (75) acres. Sit,ce this proposal supports orderly
development of the request site and adjacent properties, the t~tilities Department has
approved lifts proposal, sub. iec. t to final construction plan. approval, through the Cmmty's site
plm~ process, and a slimed agreemenl: between thc applicant and adjacent property- owners.
EN VIROiN MEN TAL
Drainage and Erosion:
The major:ity of the property drains west to Re'utc 288 and then via tributaries to Swift Creek
Reservoir. A small portion of the northeast corner dm.ins under Ottcrdale Woods Road.
There are no known on- or off-sim drainage or erosion problems with ~mne m~tici..pated
development. The property is wooded and should not be timbered without first obtaini~g a
~'.~55N£~185..MA'~':25-B(.)S
Im~d-disturbance permit t.~om the Environmental Engineering Depart.meat a~d the approved
devices inslalled. (Proft~red Condition 5)
Thc property drains to thc Swill Creek Reservoir and as such must participate in. thc pro-ra~a
f<~,e contribution for regi. oi~ai BMPs within th.e Upper Swill Creek Watershed Ptm~.
To address concerns relative to post development run off in~:o 'Uppm-Swifi Creek, Proffered
Condition 4 rcqt~ircs tompora~" sediment basins to remain in place an&?or l~ew BMPs
constructed to achieve the 0.45 phospho.ms standard until either the downstream regional
BMP has been constructed or the County obra.ins its i~,itia. I permit for implementation o'f the
Upper Swift Creek Watershed Plan.
PUBLIC FACILITIES
Fire Ser¥4ce:
The Midlofl~ian Fire Station, Company Nmnber 5, and trhe Forest View Volunteer .Rescue
Squad cun:ent.ly provide fire protection and emergency medical service (EMS). This request
will have minimal impact on Fire and EMS. When the prope~%' is developed, the nun~ber of
hydrants, quantity of water needed lbr lire protection, and access requirements will be
cYaluated fluting thc plans review pi'occss.
"['he property is 35.1 acres and is located in the southeast quadrant of the Route
288/Midlothian Turnpike (Route 60) interchange. The applicant is requesting rezoniag that
wotdd permit commercial axed industr/~ uses on the property. This request will nor 1/mit
development to a. specific land use; ttmrc£orc, it is difficult to anticipmc tr~Iic generation.
Based on trip rates for a mixed-use developmel, t including commercial, industrial and oiticc
uses, development could generate approximately 11,000 ave,'age daily i'rips (AD't). These
vehicles will initially be distributed along Route 60, which had a 2004 n~affic cmmt of 25,076
vehicles per da5.". "Ibc capacity of the lbur-lar~e sectio'n of Route 60 between Winterfield Road
a~.~d the cotmrv line J.s acceptable (Level of Service B) tb.r the volume oftraflic it currently
carries.
The 'I'horon:;hfare Plan identifies an east/west major a.l~eriaI through the property wi.th a
recommended right of way v~Sdth of ninety (90) feen The applicant has proffered to dedicate
up to ninety (90) ti:et of right of way through the. property in accordance with that :.P,..!_a.__n_
(Profl]~rcd Condition 8). Due to existing coastraints on lhe property' ca'Ltsed by Route 60 to
the nettle, Otte'rdate Woods Road to the east, and the Norfblk Southern Railroad m thc south,
The Transportation Departmenr has a~'eed that the east/west major m'terial can l~e desigmn.ted
as a "Special Access Road." Setbacks t.Scom special access streets are generally
05sN'Ol 85-M.A.Y25-B(')..q
not required unless they are de~;ermined necessary to achieve sate ingress and egress from the
property to that special access sa-eot.
A "Master Road Plan" was submilted in conjunction with this application, which shows a
general road layout on the property. The Master Road Plan shows tile Special Access Street
aligning the existing crossover on Rome 60 ih.at currcntly serves Otterdale Woods P, oad,
proposes a relocation o-"' Otterdale Woods Road, and construction of a new site road
("Commerce Place"), which will intersect the Special Access Road. The applicant has
proffered that the map prepared by AES Consulting Engineers dated Ma'rch. 4, 2005 entitled
"Commerce Place (Route 60) & Route 288 Master Road Plan" will be considered the Master
Road Plan. (Profl'cred Condition 1)
Development must adhere to tt~c Development Standards Manual in the Zoning Ordiuaacc
relative to access and iniernal circnlmion (Division 5). Access to major arterials, such a.s
Route 60 anti the. Special Access Road, should be controlted. 'lt:c applicant has proffered
that no direct access will bc provided from the property to Route 60 (P:roffcred Condition 9).
Pro. ffered Condition 9 also requires tlmt an access plan be submitted, at. time of site plan
review for Trmnsportation Depamnent approval, which shows access from the property to the
Special Access Road. Access from the prope~.'q/to the Special Access Road will con,fom~ to
~l~e approved access plau.
The traffic impact of this development must be addressed. Thc ~,ppl.i.cant has proffered to: 1 )
construct additional pavement along Route 60 ar 'fhe Otterdale Woods Road intersection 'to
provide a separate right tt,rlf lane: 2) construct additional pavement along Rome 60 to
provide dual leti turn lanes at lhe existing Route 60/Otterdale Woods Road crossover; 3)
provide i.;,~ll cost of traffic signal nqodificarion a.t the Route 60/Ottcrdale Woods Road
intcrscction; 4) construct the Special Access Road as a six (6) lane road I'i.e., ~wo (2)
southbound lanes and four (4) northbound lanes] at its intersection with. Rome 60; 5)
construct four (4) tm~es of the Special Access Road, inck~ding relocation of Otterdale Woods
Road, through the propmW; 6) consn-uct left and right turn lanes along the Special Access
.Road at thc Connnerce Place intersection, based on. Transportation Departmcm standards;
and 7) provide fifll cost oftratlic signalization of the Special Access Road/Commerce Place
intersection, if wan,'anted. (Proffered Condition 10)
At time of site plan rcvi.¢w, specific recommendations will be provided regarding access and
internal circulation.
LAND USE
Comm'ehensive Plan:
'ibc request property lies within the Route 288 Corridor Plan. The Plan recognizes the key'
strategic location of the Rou.te 288 Corridor Ibr i~uturc economic development opportunities
in the northwestern portion of the County~ One goal of the Plan is 'to maximize the economic
dcvclopmenl potcntiai of thc Route 288 Corridor by' preserving large parcels that arc suimblc
8 t')5,<. NUt 8 5-M.A¥2 5. BOS
for economic development, The Plan. £urther discourages encmachme~.~i of residential and
commerci~I uses on these prime economic development sites and suggests thai. add.:itional
commercial uses in this m'ea be ora unique rcgional scale mid design so as not to adversely
impact existing commercial projects w.'i~hin the County.
The pla~ identifies these prime sites for economic development as a Regional Employ:ment
Center, west of Route 288. The Plan suggests the request property' is appropriate ~'or l~ght
industriaL" flex use and not part of the Regional Employment C. eater. St~ggcstcd uses ~.ncI.ude
el'rice, warehouses, and Light industrial (.l-I)and some moderate industrial 0-2)'uses.
Plan fl~rther provides timt under certain circumstances, supporting small scale, retail uses
incorporated into a larger development may be appropriate
Area Develoument Trends:
Properties to tI~e north are zoned Light lndt~stria/(1-1) m~c[ RcsidcntiM. (R-9)and are occupied
by industrial, and multifamily residential uses or are vacm.~t. Snr'rom~di~tg properties to the
south, east and west are zoned Agricultural (Ay and Residential (R~I 5) and are occt:pied bv
singlc t'hm.ily rcsidcntiaI uses or are vacant. It is anticipated that the area immediately
surrounding the request property lo the south, east m~d west will develop l~r light i.nd astrial.
uses, as recommended by the .~.1..~ mad areas to the north v,5.I1 develop tbr light ind~mtria[ and
office/residential mixed uses, as recommended by the Plan.
Use. ]...mil/orions:
A plan has been submitted dividing the property in to two (2'} tracts (Proffered Condition ] ).
Within the area designated as "Commercial", in 'addition to industrial uses, a limited number
ofcotnmcrcial uses are proposed (Proffered Condition 2.A.). With_in the area designated as
'~lndustrial.", in addition to Light industrial (I-1) uses and some General Industrial ('I'-2) uses,
a limited ntm~ber of commerciai uses are proposed. (ProlTered Condition 2.B.)
Similar to the Plan recommendations, the Zxming Ordinance supDorts the provision of limited
mtaiI uses within industrial deveI.opments. The Zoning Ordinm~ce establishes circmnstmqces
tmder which co~nmercial uses are appropriate in an industrial area: commercial uses are
incorporated into a project of twenty-five (251) acres or more., do not exceed thirty (30)
percent of the permitted industrial uses, m-e not located along the periphery ora project, and
are primarily for the convenience of employees of the industrial uses. With this request, ~e
project exceeds the. Ordinance recommended acreage, and tl:~c proposed uses, as conditioned.
will primarily serve the convenience of employees of the industrial uses, except ti. mt motor
vehicle washes should be excluded. The shape of the request property conpled with the
location o£thi: East/West arterial creates difficulty wi'th thc location el' uses as suggested to
bo iocatcd inler~m.liy to rye project.
.]~?~e...].gpm ent Smndarcls:
The request property lies within an Emerging Growth [)istrict Area. The Zoning Ordinance
specifically addresses access, landscaping, [u~chitectural treatm.eni, setbacks, parking, signs,
buffers, utilities and screet~ing, 'l"hc p'[trpose et'the Emerging Growth District Standards is m
promote high quafiD,, welt-designed projects. Any nc~¥ development o£the request properS'
will be subject to these Ordinance standm-ds, except that ti~c Condition provides that setbacks
will conibrm to setback requirements ifbr Light Industrial (I- 1 ) Distri.ct in Ernerging Growth
[)isl. rict areas rather than for propcrtics zoned General Industrial (I-2). In addition, setbacks
will be based upon requirements as if the adjacent parcel to the east (Tax tD 721-709-772t)
is developed ibr industrial use rather titan a single family dwetli..ng. The Plan designates this
property for light industrial use.
Phasing of Commercial Development:
To support the Plan.'s recommendation that commercial uses support iadustrial dcvclopmcm
rather th~m locate, prcmalrtrcly on potential economic development si.les, indtmtria.i uses must
be developed before c~>m:me:rcial uses will be permitted. (Prot'I~zred Condition 31)
CONCLUSIONS
Except for fl~e motor vehicle wash use (Proffered Co:~dition 2.A. I 0.), thc pro[×-~scd industfi~, zoning
and land uses comply with the recommendations of the Route 288 Corridor }':'lan wt~ich suggests the
rcqt,cst property is appropriate ibr light industrial/flex ruse which includes office, warehouses, light
i~dustrial and some moderate industriai uses. Further, the Plm~ suggests that, uader certai~
c.i'rcm~stances, supporting small scale, retail uses incorporated into a larger development may be
appropriate. By including motor vehicle wash use as a nse permitled in tim area designated
~'commerciat" on the. Master Plan, the proposal :fails to limit con~nercial uses to tlaose 'rises wh.icl~
would primarily serve the convcnicnce of the employees ol:'th.e industrial uses. Specifically, staff
recommends tiaat motor vehicle washes not be permilted.
Given the foregoing, approval oi.'tlhis rc'q'uest is recommended, subject to motor vehicle washes
being accepted a.s a permitted use within thc area designated as ~'commercial" on the Master Plan.
CASE H]:STORY
Pianifing Commissi.o~'~ Meeting (3/15/05):
At the request of tlae applicant, the Commission defen'ed this case to A.pri[ 19, 2005.
Stat_l (...~ t6705):
The applicant was ad'viscd in wr/ting that m~y significant, new or revised intbrmafion shmdd
be submitted no later ~ha.a M~rch 2I, 2005~ for consideration at the Commission'~ April t9,.
2005, public hearing.
Also, the applicant was adv'iscd that at $230.00 deferral fee must be paid prior to the
Commission's public hearing.
Applicant (3, _~0/05 m~d 4.,'I./05):
Draft and revised proffered conditions and textual statement were submitted.
Staff (4/5/05):
To date, thc deli.gal lizc has not been paid.
Applicant (4/7/05):
Thc applicant submitted revisions to Prot_Ii~rc.d Condition 9 relative to road improvements.
Applicant (4/15/05):
The deferral fee was paid.
Planning (:mnmission Meeting (4/'I9./05):
The applScant did not accept the recommendation. There was no opposition present.
Mr. Gecker expressed concretes x,etative to the align~ment oflhe east/west major artcrial, and
the designation of the road as a special access road thus allowing reduced setbacks. In
~.ddition? hc provided that .he supports li~t industrial uses, but not the narrow strip of
commercial uses proposed along Route 60, providing that such uses do not comply with the
Plan.
Mr. Bass stated he felt tim parties should work together so ttfis economic devel.opment
opportunity would not be missed.
On motion of Mr. Gccker, seconded by Mr. Wilson, thc Commission recommended denial.
1 7 055N{.1185-MAY25-BOS
AYES: Messrs. Litton. Wilson. Gecker and Gultey.
NAY: Mr. Bass
The Board of Supervisors, on Wednesday, May 25, 2005~. beg:i~mh~.g at 7:00 p.m., will take under
c. onsideration this request.
,~. 2 05SN0185-MAY25~B(;)S
Z
/,
I