05-25-2005 MinutesBOARD OF SUPERVISORS
MINUTES
May 25, 2005
Supervisors in Attendance=
Mr. Edward B. Barber, Chairman
Mr. R. M. "Dickie" King, Jr.,
Vice Chairman
Mrs. Renny Bush Humphrey
Mr. Kelly E. Miller
Supervisor Absent:
Mr. Arthur S. Warren
Mr. Lane B. Ramsey
County Administrator
SDecial Guest in Attendance:
Senator John Watkins
Staff in Attendance:
Colonel Carl R. Baker,
Police Department
Mr. George Braunstein,
Exec. Dir., Community
Services Board
Mr. Craig Bryant, Dir.,
Utilities
Ms. Marilyn Cole, Asst.
County Administrator
Mr. Charles Dane,
Airport Manager
Ms. Rebecca Dickson, Dir.,
Budget and Management
Mr James Dunn, Dir.,
Economic Development
Mr William Dupler,
Building Official
Mr Robert Eanes, Asst. to
the County Administrator
Ms Lisa Elko, CMC,
Clerk
Mr Michael Golden, Dir.,
Parks and Recreation
Mr. Lawrence Haake, III,
Registrar
Mr. Bradford S. Hammer,
Deputy Co. Admin.,
Human Services
Mr. John W. Harmon,
Right-of-Way Manager
Mr. Russell Harris, Mgr.
of Community Development
Services
Ms. Kathryn Kitchen, Asst.
Supt. of Schools for
Business and Finance
Ms. Mary Lou Lyle, Dir.,
Accounting
Chief Paul Mauger,
Fire and EMS Dept.
Mr. R. John McCracken,
Dir., Transportation
Mr. Richard M. McElfish,
Dir., Env. Engineering
Mr. Steven L. Micas,
County Attorney
Mr. F. O. Parks, Dir.,
Information Systems Tech.
Mr. Francis Pitaro, Dir.,
General Services
Ms. Chris Ruth, Asst. Dir.,
Public Affairs
05-378
05/25/05
Ms. Sarah Snead, Dir.,
Social Services
Mr. Cames J. L. Stegmaier,
Deputy Co. Actmin.,
Management Services
Mr. M. D. Stith, Jr.,
Deputy Co. Actmin.,
Con~uuni ty Development
Mr. Kirk Turner, Dir.,
Planning
Mr. B. R. Wilkinson,
License Inspector
Dr. Jean Warzeski, His.
Soc ~ety Administrator
Mr. Barber called the regularly scheduled meeting to order at
4:07 p.m.
1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES FOR APRIL 27, 2005
On motion of Mrs. Humphrey, seconded by Mr. King, the Board
approved the minutes of April 27, 2005, as submitted.
Ayes: Barber, King, Humphrey and Miller.
Nays: None.
Absent: Warren.
2. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ' S COMMENTS
2.A. BRAC RECOMMENDATIONS UPDATE
Mr. Ramsey stated the Defense Supply Center Richmond was not
only saved, but will grow as a result of the recently
disclosed Department of Defense's BRAC (Base Realignment and
Closure Commission) recommendations for military base
closures. He further stated Fort Lee gained significantly in
the process, with an additional 6,000 military and 1,150
civilian positions. He then called forward Mr~ Jason Gray,
Legislative Assistant to Congressman J. Randy Forbes and
thanked him for his efforts in the BRAC process.
Mr. Gray stated the lengthy process is not over yet and
provided details of the remainder of the process, indicating
that the final BRAC recommendations should be complete in
November 2005. He thanked the county, on behalf of
Congressman Forbes, for its support of the regional BRAC
Advisory Committee. He stated Congressman Forbes will remain
vigilant and keep the county informed throughout the process.
Mr. Ramsey thanked Mr. Dane, the county's Airport Manager for
serving on the BRAC Advisory Committee.
Mrs. Humphrey stated the region provided a tremendous amount
of data to ensure the future of Fort Lee. She ~urther stated
the expansion of Fort Lee will be an extraordinary gain for
the region, and she is glad Chesterfield County had the
opportunity to participate in this successful endeavor
through the Crater Planning District Commission.
05-379
05/25/05
2.B. CERTIFICATION PRESENTATIONS
Mr. Eanes stated General Services' Fleet Management Division
and the Utilities Department Proctor's Creek Waste Water
Treatment Plant recently achieved the Virginia Department of
Environmental Quality (DEQ) Exemplary Environmental
Enterprise (E3) Certification in the Virginia Environmental
Excellence Program. He then introduced Mr. Mike Murphy, DEQ
Division of Environmental Enhancements.
Mr. Murphy provided details of the process through which both
Fleet Management and the Proctor's Creek Waste Water
Treatment Plant received their E-3 Certification. He
congratulated the employees of both operations on their
extraordinary accomplishments.
Mr. Eanes then introduced Mr. Bob Herbert, Fellow, Virginia
Tech Center for the Organizational and Technological
Advancement Program.
Mr. Herbert commended the county on its efforts in the area
of proactive environmental management.
Mr. Murphy presented the E-3 Certifications to Fleet
Management and Utilities Department employees, accompanied by
Mr. Barber and Environmental Manager Jeff Howard, and
congratulated them on this tremendous achievement.
Mr. Ramsey thanked Mr. Murphy and Mr. Herbert for their
leadership in environmental management.
Mr. Barber expressed appreciation to the employees for the
tremendous amount of work involved in achieving these
certifications.
3. BOARD COMMITTEE REPORTS
There were no Board committee reports at this time.
4. REQUESTS TO POSTPONE ACTION, ADDITIONS, OR CHANGES IN T~
ORDER OF PRESENTATION
On motion of Mr. King, seconded by Mr. Miller, the Board
replaced Item 8.C.6., State Road Acceptance; replaced Item
8.C.16.a., Transfer of District Improvement Funds from the
Dale District Improvement Fund to the Parks and Recreation
Department to Purchase a Storage Shed for Athletic Equipment
at the Hening Elementary School Sports Complex; added Item
8.C.17., Transfer of Road Cash Proffer Funds for the Chalkley
Road Shoulder Project; added Item 8.C.18., Appropriation of
Additional Funds for Comprehensive Services; added Item
8.C.19., Approval and Ratification of Construction Contracts
for the Construction of a 'T' Hangar and a Corporate Hangar
for Chesterfield County Airport to 42 Contracting
Incorporated, to Evans Construction Company and to Manning
Construction Company; added Item 8.C.20., Initiation of an
Application to Rezone Certain Parcels Located within the
Route 288 Corridor Plan from Agricultural to I-2 With a
Conditional Use Planned Development to Permit Ordinance
Exceptions; added Item 8.C.21., Authorization to Transfer the
Subordination of the County's Reversionary Interest at Lucy
05-380
05/25/05
Corr Nursing Home to Refinanced Debt; replaced Item 10.B.,
Report on the Status of General Fund Balance, Reserve for
Future Capital Projects, District Improvement Funds, and
Lease Purchases; and adopted the Agenda, as amended.
Ayes: Barber, King, Humphrey and Miller.
Nays: None.
Absent: Warren.
5. RESOLUTIONS AND SPECIAL RECOGNITIONS
5.A. RECOGNIZING MR. RICK PARKS, INFORMATION SYSTEMS
TECHNOLOGY DEPARTMENT, UPON HIS RETIREMENT
Mr. Stegmaier introduced Mr. Rick Parks who was present to
receive the resolution.
On motion of the Board, the following resolution was adopted:
WHEREAS, Mr. Rick Parks will[ retire from the
Chesterfield County Information Systems Technology Depart~nent
on June 1, 2005, after providing 27 years of quality service
to the citizens of Chesterfield County; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Parks has faithfully served the cou. nty in
the capacity of Director for the Information Systems
Technology Department; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Parks has provided leadership for local,
regional and state technology initiatives and policy
development; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Parks graduated from Chesterfield County's
School of Quality in August 2000; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Parks provided direction and guidance to
establish an Information Technology Steering Committee to
ensure organizational involvement in s%rategic planning, and
the prioritization of countywide technology initiatives
aligned with county business goals; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Parks has demonstrated outstanding
leadership as the champion for technology solutions to
promote efficient and effective business operations
throughout the county; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Parks' honorable character, selfless
dedication to Chesterfield County, co~itment to excellence
are a model for all county employees, and his integrity,
ethics and values are guiding principles that place
Information Systems Technology in a professional category
respected throughout the state and nation as a leader in
technology; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Parks has developed and maintaine~ a
technically proficient and professional workforce within
Chesterfield County to deliver reliable, secure and timely
information; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Parks has promoted a departmental culture
that empowers employees to express new ideas and opinions;
his vision, project leadership and willingness to get
05-381
05/25/05
involved are respected throughout the county organization,
and he is an exceptional manager of people; and
WHEREAS, Mr.
trust, optimism,
encouraged; and
Parks has created an environment where
enjoyment, and personal growth are
WHEREAS, Mr. Parks has provided the Chesterfield County
Information Systems Technology Department with many years of
loyal and dedicated service; and
WHEREAS, Chesterfield County and the Board
Supervisors will miss Mr. Parks' diligent service.
of
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Chesterfield
County Board of Supervisors, this 25th day of May 2005,
publicly recognizes Mr. Rick Parks, and extends on behalf of
its members and the citizens of Chesterfield County,
appreciation for his service to the county, congratulations
upon his retirement, and best wishes for a long and happy
retirement.
AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that a copy of this
resolution be presented to Mr. Parks, and that this
resolution be permanently recorded among the papers of this
Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County.
Ayes: Barber, King, Humphrey and Miller.
Nays: None.
Absent: Warren.
Mr. Barber presented the executed resolution and a Jefferson
Cup to Mr. Parks, accompanied by members of his family,
expressed appreciation for his dedicated service and
congratulated him on his retirement.
Mr. Parks thanked the Board for its support over the years
and expressed appreciation to Mr. Ramsey for his and
leadership. He also thanked Mr. Stegmaier and Mr. Hammer for
their support and IST employees for the privilege of guiding
them into a journey of technology.
A standing ovation followed.
5.B. RECOGNIZING SERGEANT ROBERT C. "BOBBY" RICHARDSON,
POLICE DEPARTMENT, UPON HIS RETIREMENT
Colonel Baker introduced Sergeant Robert Richardson who was
present to receive the resolution.
On motion of the Board, the following resolution was adopted:
WHEREAS, Sergeant Robert C. ~Bobby" Richardson will
retire from the Chesterfield County Police Department on June
1, 2005, after providing 30 years of quality service to the
citizens of Chesterfield County; and
WHEREAS, Sergeant Richardson began his service with
Chesterfield County in 1975 as a Water Plant Operator in the
Utilities Department; served as a volunteer Special Police
Officer in 1976; and has faithfully served the Police
Department since February 1978 in the capacities of Patrol
05-382
O5/25/O5
Officert Field Training Officer, Investigator, Detective, and
Sergeant; and
WHEREAS, Sergeant Richardson served on the Special
Weapons and Tactical Team (SWAT) from 1980 through 1982; the
South End Multi-Jurisdictional Drug Task Force for two years;
and on the North End Multi-jurisdictional Drug Task Force,
known as "Troika", for six years, and as supervisor during
the last two of those years; and
WHEREAS, Sergeant Richardson received a commendation for
the achievements of the "Troika" Task Force while under his
supervision, which included the investigation of 27 major
cases, the arrest of 70 offenders and the seizure of over
$500,000 in assets; and
WHEREAS, Sergeant Richardson received a commendation for
his participation in a joint task force composed of the Drug
Enforcement Administration (DEA), Internal Revenue Service
(IRS) and the Chesterfield County Police, after the
investigation of a large-scale marijuana distribution
organization resulted in the arrest and prosecution of tlhree
suspects and the seizure and forfeiture of over $400,000 in
cash; and
WHEREAS, Sergeant Richardson served as the Police
Department's Asset Forfeiture Coordinator, facilitating the
court ordered civil forfeiture of drug assets and property
used during the commission of certain cr~mes; and
WHEREAS, during his career, Sergeant Richardson served
as a Department of Criminal Justice Services certified
instructor in Search and Seizure, Drug Identification and
Investigations, Surveillance Techniques and Asset Forfeiture
for Chesterfield County's Police Training Academy, as well as
regional training academies throughout the state; and
WHEREAS, Sergeant Richardson received the 2003 Major
Mason T. Chalkley Award for Excellence, thereby serving as a
role model for other department members and citizens of
Chesterfield County; and
WHEREAS, Sergeant Richardson has received numerous
letters of thanks and appreciation for service rendered from
the citizens of Chesterfield County and has provided the
Chesterfield County Police Department with many years of
loyal and dedicated service; and
WHEREAS, Chesterfield County and the Board of
Supervisors will miss Sergeant Richardson's diligent service.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chesterfield
County Board of Supervisors, this 25tn day of May 2005,
publicly recognizes Sergeant Robert C. "Bobby" Richardson,
and extends on behalf of its members and the citizens of
Chesterfield County appreciation for his service to the
county, congratulations upon his retirement, and best wishes
for a long and happy retirement.
AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that a copy of this
resolution be presented to Sergeant Richardson, and that this
resolution be permanently recorded among the papers of this
Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County.
Ayes: Barber, King, Humphrey and Miller.
Nays: None.
Absent: Warren.
05-383
05/25/05
Mr. Miller presented the executed resolution and a Jefferson
Cup to Sergeant Richardson, accompanied by members of his
family and Colonel Baker, thanked him for his many
contributions to the county, and congratulated him upon his
retirement.
Sergeant Richardson expressed appreciation to the Board and
Mr. Ramsey for the financial support that has been provided
to the Police Department over the years. He also expressed
appreciation to Colonel Baker and retired Police Chiefs for
the opportunities and support they provided to him, and also
to his family for their support and patience throughout his
career.
A standing ovation followed.
5.C. RECOGNIZING JODY L. BROWN, POLICE DEPARTMENT, UPON HER
Colonel Baker introduced Ms. Jody Brown who was present to
receive the resolution.
On motion of the Board, the following resolution was adopted:
WHEREAS, Jody L. Brown will retire from the Chesterfield
County Police Department on June 1, 2005, after providing 31
years of quality service to the citizens of Chesterfield
County; and
WHEREAS, Jody has served the Police Department in the
capacity of Secretary, Crime and Research Analyst, Senior
Crime Analyst, Police Intelligence Supervisor, and Police
Analysis/Information Coordinator; and
WHEREAS, Jody received a Certificate of Achievement for
the diligent and dedicated work she contributed while serving
as a member of the Police Accreditation Team, and the team's
work resulted in the Police Department becoming fully
accredited in the state of Virginia; and
WHEREAS, Jody has supervised the Crime/Intelligence Unit
of the Police Planning and Information Services Division for
11 years; and
WHEREAS, Jody was the co-founder of the Richmond Metro
Street Crimes Group; and
WHEREAS, Jody was instrumental in forming the Regional
Narcotics Network; and
WHEREAS, Jody received a Certificate of Achievement for
her actions in notifying the Colonial Heights Police of
information possibly connected to a crime under their
investigation, and due to her keen observation skills,
investigators from the Colonial Heights and Chesterfield
Police Departments were able to quickly conclude a robbery
case that resulted in a warrant being obtained for the
suspect; and
WHEREAS, Jody received the Major ~ason T. Chalkley
Supervisory Concern for People award and was also the
recipient of the Civilian Employee of the Year award in 1992,
and again in 2004; and
WHEREAS, Chesterfield County and the
Supervisors will miss Jody's diligent service.
Board of
05-384
05/25/05
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chesterfield
County Board of Supervisors, this 25~n day of May 2005,
publicly recognizes Jody L. Brown~ and extends on behalf of
its members and the citizens of Chesterfield County
appreciation for her service to the County, congratulations
upon her retirement, and best wishes for a long and happy
retirement.
AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that a copy of this
resolution be presented to Jody, and that this resolution be
permanently recorded among the papers of this Board of
Supervisors of Chesterfield County.
Ayes: Barber, King, Humphrey and Miller.
Nays: None.
Absent: Warren.
Mr. King presented the executed resolution to Ms. Brown,
accompanied by Colonel Baker and Captain Steve Neal,
expressed appreciation for her dedicated service, and offered
best wishes on her retirement.
Ms. Brown stated it has been an honor to work for the Police
Department and serve the citizens of Chesterfield County.
A standing ovation followed.
5.D. RECOGNIZIN~ MAY 25,2005, AS ~CHESTERFiELD COUNTY
HISTORY DAY"
Mr. Hammer introduced Mr. Horace Mann, Colonel, U.S. .Army
(Retired), President of the Chesterfield Historical Society,
and newly appointed Historical Society Administrator, Dr.
Jean Warzeski, who were present to receive the resolution.
On motion of the Board, the following resolution was adopted:
WHEREAS, Chesterfield County was founded on May 25,
1749, by the House of Burgesses and was carved from Henrico
County to eliminate lengthy travel by residents from the
southern area to the Courthouse for business and court
proceedings; and
WHEREAS, Chesterfield County received its name from the
Fourth Earl of Stanhope, England's famed Lord Chesterfield;
and
WHEREAS, Chesterfield was first settled in 1611 at the
Citie of Henricus when residents of Jamestown moved upstream
to a "convenient, strong, healthie and sweete seate" for a
new town after conditions at Jamestown were too harsh; and
WHEREAS, in 1612, tobacco was first
scientifically in America at Bermuda Hundred; and
cultivated
WHEREAS, in 1614, Bermuda
incorporated town in America; and
Hundred was the first
WHEREAS, in 1619, Falling Creek was the first iron
furnace in the New World; and
05-385
05/25/05
WHEREAS, in 1622, Mount Malady, near Dutch gap, was the
site of the first American hospital and later the first
school for deaf-mutes at "Cobbs" on the lower Appomattox
River; and
WHEREAS, in 1709, Midlothian produced
commercially mined coal in America; and
the first
WHEREAS, in 1807, Midlothian Turnpike was the first
paved road in Virginia; and
WHEREAS, in 1811 the first commercial tramway was put
into operation; and
WHEREAS, in 1831, the Midlothian to Manchester Railroad
was the first in Virginia; and
WHEREAS, Chesterfield was the rendezvous
recruits during the American Revolution; and
for new
WHEREAS, Drewry's Bluff, which overlooks the James
River, was a Confederate stronghold during the Civil War and
the Howlett Line was a major Confederate line of defense in
defending Chesterfield, Richmond, and Petersburg; and
WHEREAS, Chesterfield has been the site of many firsts,
and it continues to be a first choice community.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chesterfield
County Board of Supervisors, this 25th day of May 2005,
publicly recognizes May 25th as "Chesterfield County History
Day."
Ayes: Barber, King, Humphrey and Miller.
Nays: None.
Absent: Warren.
Mrs. Humphrey presented the executed resolution to Colonel
Mann and Dr. Warzeski and expressed appreciation for their
efforts in promoting Chesterfield's history.
6. WORK SESSIONS
There were no work sessions at this time.
7. DEFERRED IT.S
There were no deferred items at this time.
8. NEW BUSINESS
8.A. STREETLIGHT INSTALLATION COST APPROVALS
On motion of Mr. King, seconded by Mr. Miller, the Board
approved a request for the following streetlight in the Enon
Oaks Subdivision in Bermuda District:
05-386
O5/25/05
Enon Oaks Lane, in the vicinity of 318/324
Cost to install streetlight: $1,523.62
Ayes: Barber, King, Humphrey and Miller.
Nays: None.
Absent: Warren.
8.B. APPOINTMENTS
On motion of Mrs. Humphrey, seconded by Mr. King, the Board
suspended its rules at this time to allow simultaneous
nomination/appointment of a member to serve on the Disability
Services Board.
Ayes: Barber, King, Humphrey and Miller.
Nays: None.
Absent: Warren.
O DISABILITY SERVICES BOARD
On motion of Mr. King, seconded by Mr. Miller, the Board
simultaneously nominated/appointed Ms. Ellen Triable,
representing the county at-large, to serve on the Disability
Services Board, whose term is effective immediately and
expires December 31, 2005.
Ayes: Barber, King, Humphrey and Miller.
Nays: None.
Absent: Warren.
8.C. CONSENT ITEMS
8.C.1. ADOPTION OF RESOLUTIONS
8.C.l.a. RECOGNIZING FIREFIGHTER/CARDIAC TECHNICIAN RUDOLPH
LEWIS, JR., CHESTERFIELD FIRE AND EMERGENCY
MEDICAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT, UPON HIS RETIREMEN]?
On motion of Mr. King, seconded by Mr. Miller, the Board
adopted the following resolution:
WHEREAS, Firefighter/Cardiac Technician Rudolph (Louie)
Lewis, Jr. attended Recruit School #16 in October 1985 and
has faithfully served the citizens of Chesterfield County for
over 19 years in various station assignments as a firefiglhter
at the Chester, Dale and Bensley Fire Stations; as a
Firefighter/Cardiac Technician at the Matoaca and Dutch Gap
Fire Stations, and various other station assignments; and
WHEREAS, Firefighter/Cardiac Technician Lewis
extinguished a fire in a trailer on Elokoman Avenue with a
water extinguisher, without the aid of a hose line, located
the occupant and removed him to the outside; and
WHEREAS, Firefighter/Cardiac Technician Lewis worked as
a member of a team receiving a Unit Citation for treating an
acute asthma patient that would not have survived if not for
the actions of Firefighter Lewis; and
05-387
05~25~05
WHEREAS, Firefighter/Cardiac Technician Lewis responded
to the tornado strike at Wal-Mart in Colonial Heights,
resulting in him transporting eleven patients to Southside
Regional Medical Center; and
WHEREAS, Firefighter/Cardiac Technician Lewis worked
with limited manpower to successfully extinguish a garage
fire and prevent extension before other crews arrived; and
WHEREAS, Firefighter/Cardiac Technician Lewis has served
for over 19 years with Chesterfield Fire and Emergency
Medical Services by responding to the aid of its citizens
with his firefighting and emergency medical skills.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Chesterfield
County Board of Supervisors recognizes the contributions of
Firefighter/Cardiac Technician Rudolph (Louie) Lewis, Jr.,
expresses the appreciation of all residents for his service
to the county, and extends congratulations upon his
retirement.
Ayes: Barber, King, Humphrey and Miller.
Nays: None.
Absent: Warren.
8.C.l.b. AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF A CONTINUING
DISCLOSURE AGREEMENT IN CONNECTION WITH THE
ISSUANCE BY THE VIRGINIA PUBLIC SCHOOL AUTHORITY
(VPSA) OF ITS SCHOOL REFUNDING BONDS SERIES
2003D, A PORTION OF THE PROCEEDS OF WHICH REFUNDED
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY GENERAL OBLIGATION SCHOOL
BONDS, SERIES 1995A AND SERIES 1987
On motion of Mr. King, seconded by Mr. Miller, the Board
adopted the following resolution:
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION AND DELIVERY OF A
CONTINUING DISCLOSURE AGREEMENT IN CONNECTION WITH THE
ISSUANCE BY THE VIRGINIA PUBLIC SCHOOL AUTHORITY OF ITS
SCHOOL FINANCING BONDS (1997 RESOLUTION) REFUNDING SERIES
2003 D, A PORTION OF THE PROCEEDS OF WHICH REFUNDED THE
COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD GENERAL OBLIGATION SCHOOL BONDS,
SERIES 1987 AND 1995A; AND AUTHORIZING ANY OTHER ACTIONS
NECESSARY TO ACHIEVE THE OBJECTIVES CONTEMPLATED HEREBY.
WHEREAS, the Virginia Public School Authority (the
~Authority") pursuant to (i) a bond resolution adopted on
August 13, 1987, as amended and supplemented (the ~1987
Resolution"); (ii) a bond resolution duly adopted on June 26,
1991, as amended, restated and supplemented (the "1991
Resolution"); and (iii) a bond resolution adopted on
October 23, 1997, as amended, restated and supplemented (the
~1997 Resolution") issued bonds (respectively, the ~1987
Resolution Bonds", the ~1991 Resolution Bonds" and the ~1997
Resolution Bonds") for the purpose of purchasing general
obligation school bonds of certain cities and counties within
the Commonwealth of Virginia; and
WHEREAS, the Authority has issued under the 1987
Resolution several series of 1987 Resolution Bonds, including
two series designated as "School Financing Bonds (1987
Resolution) 1987 Series B" (the "Series 1987 B Bonds") and
05-388
05/25/05
"School Financing Bonds (1987 Resolution) 1991 Refunding
Series C" (the ~Series 1991 C Bonds"), of the Virginia Public
School Authority; and
WHEREAS, the Authority used a portion of the proceeds of
the Series 1987 B Bonds to purchase certain duly authorized
and issued general obligation school bonds of the County of
Chesterfield, Virginia (the "County") designated the "County
of Chesterfield General Obligation School Bonds, Series 1987"
(the "1987 Local School Bonds"); and
WHEREAS, the Authority used a portion of the proceeds of
the Series 1991 C Bonds to refund the Series 1987 B Bonds;
and
WHEREAS, the Authority has issued under the 1991
Resolution a series of 1991 Resolution Bonds designated[ as
~School Financing Bonds (1991 Resolution) Series 1995 A" (the
"Series 1995 A Bonds") of the Virginia Public Sclnool
Authority; and
WHEREAS, the Authority used a portion of the proceeds of
the Series 1995 A Bonds to purchase certain duly authorized
and issued general obligation school bonds of the County
designated the ~County of Chesterfield General Obligation
School Bonds, Series 1995A" (collectively, with the 1987
Local School Bonds, the ~Local School Bonds"); and
WHEREAS, the Authority refunded its Series 1995 A Bonds
and a portion of its Series 1991 C Bonds (collectively, the
~Refunded Bonds") from a portion of the proceeds of its
Virginia Public School Authority (1997 Resolution) Refunding
Series 2003 D (the ~Refunding Bonds"), issued under the 1997
Resolution; and
WHEREAS, the Authority in refunding the Refunded Bonds
has pledged the Local School Bonds for the benefit of the
holders of bonds issued under its 11997 Resolution; and
WHEREAS, the Authority is required to assist the
underwriters (the ~Underwriters") of the Refunding Bonds with
their duty to comply with Securities and Exchange Commission
("SEC") Rule 15c2-12 (the ~Rule"); and
WHEREAS, the Authority has requested the County to
execute a Continuing Disclosure Agreement in order for the
Authority to assist the Underwriters in complying with the
Rule; and
WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of the County of
Chesterfield, Virginia considers it to be advisable for the
County to fulfill the request of the Authority to execute a
Continuing Disclosure Agreement.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD
SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD, VIRGINIA:
OF
Continuing Disclosure Agreement.
The Chairman of the Board of Supervisors, the
County Administrator and such officer or officers as they may
designate are hereby authorized to enter into a Continuing
Disclosure Agreement in the form attached as Appendix A
05-389
05/25/05
hereto, containing such covenants as may be necessary in
order for compliance with the provisions of the Rule, and any
other documents the Authority deems necessary to comply with
the SEC rules and any Internal Revenue Service rules and
regulations regarding maintaining the tax-exempt status of
the bonds.
2. Further Actions.
The members of the Board and all officers,
employees and agents of the County are hereby authorized to
take such action as they or any one of them may consider
necessary or desirable in connection with the execution and
delivery of the Continuing Disclosure Agreement and
maintaining the tax-exempt status of the bonds, and any such
action previously taken is hereby ratified and confirmed.
3. Effective Date.
This resolution shall take effect immediately.
And, further, the Board appropriated refunding proceeds of
$467,386 from the Virginia Public School Authority (VPSA),
which will be applied toward design costs associated with the
replacement Clover Hill High School project.
Ayes: Barber, King, Humphrey and Miller.
Nays: None.
Absent: Warren.
8 .C.2.
8 .C.2 .&.
SET PUBLIC HEARING DATES
TO CONSIDER REVISIONS TO THE FY2005 SCHOOL BOARD
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN APPROPRIATIONS
On motion of Mr. King, seconded by Mr. Miller, the Board set
the date of June 22, 2005 at 7:00 p.m. for a public hearing
for the Board to consider increasing the appropriations in
the School Capital Improvements fund by $1,421,500.
Ayes: Barber, King, Humphrey and Miller.
Nays: None.
Absent: Warren.
8.C.2.b. TO CONSIDER AMENDMENTS TO THE SIGN ORDINANCE
On motion of Mr. King, seconded by Mr. Miller, the Board set
the date of June 22, 2005 at 7:00 p.m. for a public hearing
for the Board to consider amendments to Sections 19-635, 19-
636, and 19-637 of the Code of the County of Chesterfield,
1997, as amended, relating to the sign ordinance.
Ayes: Barber, King, Humphrey and Miller.
Nays: None.
Absent: Warren.
8.c.2.c. TO CONSIDER THE FY2006 SECONDARY ROAD IMPROVEP~/~
BUDGET
On motion of Mr. King, seconded by Mr. Miller, the Board set
the date of June 22, 2005 at 7:00 p.m. for a public hearing
05-390
05/25/05
for the Board to consider
Transportation (VDOT) FY2006
Budget for Chesterfield County.
the Virginia Department of
Secondary Road Improvement
Ayes: Barber, King, Humphrey and Miller.
Nays: None.
Absent: Warren.
8.C.2.d. TO CONSIDER THE RECEIPT AND APPROPRIATION OF FU~S
IN DISASTER RECOVERY FUNDING FROM THE FEDERAL
EMERGENCY MANAGEMENTAGENCY
On motion of Mr. King, seconded by Mr. Miller, the Board set
the date of June 22, 2005 at 7:00 p.m. for a public hearing
to consider the receipt and appropriation of $1,883,843.29 in
disaster recovery funding from the Federal Emergency
Management Agency (FEMA) for expenses incurred during
Tropical Depression Gaston.
Ayes: Barber, King, Humphrey and Miller.
Nays: None.
Absent: Warren.
8.C.3. AWARD OF CONTRACT WITH KPMG LLP FOR FINANCIAL AUDIT
SERVICES
On motion of Mr. King, seconded by Mr. Miller, the Board
authorized the County Administrator to enter into a contract
with KPMG LLP for financial audit services.
Ayes: Barber, King, Humphrey and Miller.
Nays: None.
Absent: Warren.
8.C.4. REQUEST FOR A MUSIC/ENTERTAINMENT FESTIVAL PERMIT FOR
RIVERS BEND CONCERT SERIES ON FRIDAY EVENINGS, MAY 27
THROUGH JULY 29, 2005
On motion of Mr. King, seconded by Mr. Miller, the Board
approved a request for a music/entertainment festival permit
for the River's Bend Concert Series for' Friday evenings, May
27 through July 29, 2005 and for rain dates for all Fridays
in the month of August.
Ayes: Barber, King, Humphrey and Miller.
Nays: None.
Absent: Warren.
8.C.5. REQUEST FOR A PERMIT TO STAGE A FIREWORKS DISPLAY AT
SOUTHSIDE SPEEDWAY ON JULY 1, 2005
On motion of Mr. King, seconded by Mr. Miller, the Board
approved a permit to stage a fireworks display at Southside
Speedway on July 1, 2005, with a rain date of September 2,
2005.
Ayes: Barber, King, Humphrey and Miller.
Nays: None.
Absent: Warren.
05-391
05/25/05
8.C.6. STATE ROAD ACCEPTANCE
On motion of Mr. King, seconded by Mr. Miller, the Board
adopted the following resolution:
WHEREAS, the streets described below are shown on plats
recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of
Chesterfield County; and
WHEREAS, the Resident Engineer for the Virginia
Department of Transportation has advised this Board the
streets meet the requirements established by the Subdivision
Street Requirements of the Virginia Department of
Transportation.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that this Board requests
the Virginia Department of Transportation to add the streets
described below to the secondary system of state highways,
pursuant to Section 33.1-229, Code of Virginia, and the
Department's Subdivision Street Requirements.
AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that this Board guarantees
a clear and unrestricted right-of-way, as described, and any
necessary easements for cuts, fills and drainage.
AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that a certified copy of
this resolution be forwarded to the Resident Engineer for the
Virginia Department of Transportation.
Tvi)e Chan¢~e to the Secondary System of State Hi;ihways:
Basis for Change:
Statutory Reference:
Project:
From:
To:
Addition, New subdivision street
§33.1-229
Addition
Southcreek, Section 7
Pleasant Creek Court, State Route Number: 5877
Pleasant Creek Dr., (Rt. 5566)
Cul-de-sac, a distance of: 0.03 miles
Right-of-way record was filed on 10/29/2003 with the Office Of Clerk To Cimuit Court in Plat Book 138,
Page 59, with a width of 50 Ft.
· Pleasant Creek Drive, State Route Number: 5566
From: Woodland Hill Dr., (Rt. 4071)
To: Pleasant Creek PI., (Rt. 5875), a distance of: 0.08 miles
Right-of-way record was filed on 10/29/2003 with the Office Of Clerk To Cimuit Court in Plat Book 138,
Page 59, with a width of 50 Ft.
· Pleasant Creek Drive, State Route Number: 5566
From: Pleasant Creek PI., (Rt. 5875)
To: Woodhugh PI., (Rt. 5876), a distance of: 0.16 miles
Right-of-way record was filed on 10/29/2003 with the Office of Clerk To Circuit Court in Plat Book 138,
Page 59, with a width of 50 Ft.
05-392
05/25/05
From:
To:
Pleasant Creek Drive, State Route Number: 5566
Woodhugh PI., (Rt. 5876)
Pleasant Creek Ct., (Rt. 5877), a distance of: 0.07 miles
·
From:
To:
Right-of-way record was filed on 10/29/2003 with the Office Of Clerk To Circuit Court in Plat Book 138,
Page 59, with a width of 50 Ft.
Pleasant Creek Drive, State Route Number: 5566
Pleasant Creek Ct., (Rt. 5877)
0.04 Mi. S of Pleasant Creek Ct., (Rt. 5877), a distance of: 0.04 miles
Right-of-way record was filed on 10/29/2003 with the Office Of Clerk To Circuit Court in Plat Book 138,
Page 59, with a width of 50 Ft.
· Pleasant Creek Place, State Route Number: 5875
From: Pleasant Creek Dr., (Rt. 5566)
To: Cul-de-sac, a distance of: 0.03 miles
Right-of-way record was filed on 10/29/2003 with the Office Of Clerk To Circuit Court in Plat Book 138,
Page 59, with a width of 50 Ft.
· Woodhugh Place, State Route Number: 5876
From: Pleasant Creek Dr., (Rt. 5566)
To: Cul-de-sac, a distance of: 0.03 miles
Right-of-way record was filed on 10/29/2003 with the Office Of Clerk To Cimuit Court in Plat Book 138.
Page 59, with a width of 50 Ft.
And, further, the Board
WHEREAS, the streets
recorded in the Clerk's
Chesterfield County; and
adopted the following resolution:
described bellow are shown on plats
Office of the Circuit Court of
WHEREAS, the Resident
Department of Transportation
streets meet the requirements
Street Requirements of
Transportation.
Engineer for the Virginia
has advised this Board the
established by the Subdivision
the Virg'inia Department of
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that this Board requests
the Virginia Department of Transportation to add the streets
described below to the secondary system of state highways,
pursuant to Section 33.1-229, Code of Virginia, and the
Department's Subdivision Street Requirements.
AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that this Board guarantees
a clear and unrestricted right-of-way, as described, and any
necessary easements for cuts, fills and drainage.
AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that a certified copy of
this resolution be forwarded to the Resident Engineer for the
Virginia Department of Transportation.
05-393
05/25/05
Basis for Change:
Statutory Reference:
Project:
From:
To:
Type Change to the Secondary System of State Highways:
Addition, New subdivision street
§33.1-229
Stoney Glen South, Section 4
Delamere Drive, State Route Number: 5868
Faraday Dr., (Rt. 5670)
Addition
Woodleigh Dr., (Rt. 5668), a distance of: 0.18 miles
Right-of-way record was filed on 8/23/2004 with the Office Of Clerk To Circuit Court in Plat Book 147,
Page 3, with a width of 50 Ft.
· Faraday Court, State Route Number: 5869
From: Faraday Dr., (Rt. 5670)
To: Cul-de-dac, a distance of: 0.06 miles
Right-of-way record was filed on 8/23/2004 with the Office Of Clerk To Circuit Court in Plat Book 147,
Page 3, with a width of 50 Ft.
· Faraday Drive, State Route Number: 5670
From: Faraday Dr., (Rt. 5670)
To: Faraday Ct., (Rt. 5869), a distance of: 0.03 miles
Right-of-way record was flied on 8/23/2004 with the Office Of Clerk To Circuit Court in Plat Book 147,
Page 3, with a width of 50 Ft.
· Faraday Drive, State Route Number: 5670
From: Faraday Ct., (Rt. 5869)
To: Delamera Dr., (Rt. 5868), a distance of: 0.03 miles
Right-of-way record was filed on 8/23/2004 with the Office Of Clerk To Circuit Court in Plat Book 147,
Page 3, with a width of 50 Ft.
· Faraday Drive, State Route Number: 5670
From: Delamere Dr., (Rt. 5868)
To: 0.03 Mi. E of Delamere Dr. (Rt. 5868), a distance of: 0.03 miles
Right-of-way record was filed on 8/23/2004 with the Office Of Clerk To Circuit Court in Plat Book 147,
Page 3, with a width of 50 Ft.
· Woodleigh Drive, State Route Number: 5668
From: Woodleigh Dr., (Rt. 5668)
To: Delamere Dr., (Rt. 5868), a distance of: 0.09 miles
Right-of-way record was filed on 3/23/2004 with the office Of Clerk To Circuit Court in Plat Book 147,
Page 3, with a width of 50 Ft.
Woodleigh Drive, State Route Number: 5668
Delamera Dr., (Rt. 5868)
0.03 Mi. E of Delamere Dr., (Rt. 5868), a distance of: 0.03 miles
From:
To:
05-394
05/25/05
Right-of-wayreco~wasfiledon~23/2004withtheOffice~Cle~ ~ CimuitCou~inPlatBook147,
Page3, withawidthof5OFt.
Ayes: Barber, King, Humphrey and Miller.
Nays: None.
Absent: Warren.
8.C.7. REQUESTS FOR PERMISSION
8.C.7.&. FROM KEVIN C. AND ALISON C. WYLIE FOR A PROPOSED
FENCE TO ENCROACH WITHIN AN EIGHT-FOOT EASEMENT AND
A TWENTY-FOOT SEWER EASEMENT ACROSS LOT 9, TANNER
VILLAGE, SECTION B AT CHARTER COLONY
On motion of Mr. King, seconded by Mr. Miller, the Board
approved a request from Kevin C. Wylie and Alison C. ~lie
for permission for a proposed fence to encroach within an
eight-foot easement and a 20-foot sewer easement across Lot
9, Tanner Village, Section B at Charter Colony, subject to
the execution of a license agreement. (It is noted a copy of
the plat is filed with the papers of thLs Board.)
Ayes: Barber, King, Humphrey and Miller.
Nays: None.
Absent: Warren.
8.C.7.b. FROM 95-10 DEVELOPMENT, L.C. TO INSTALL A PRIVATE
SEWER SERVICE WITHIN A PRIVATE EASEMENT TO SERVe:
PROPERTY ON GROVER COURT
On motion of Mr. King, seconded by Mr. Miller, the Board
approved a request from 95-10 Development, L.C. for
permission to install a private sewer service within a
private easement to serve property at i[3300 Grover Court and
authorized the County Administrator to execute the sewer
connection agreement. (It is noted a copy of the plat is
filed with the papers of this Board.)
Ayes: Barber, King, Humphrey and Miller.
Nays: None.
Absent: Warren.
8 .C.7 .c.
FROM IRA CLEON DEANER FOR A PROPOSED FENCE TO
ENCROACH WITHIN A SiXTEEN-FOOT DRAINAGE EASEMENT
ACROSS LOT 74, HARTLEY VILLAGE AT CHARTER COLONY
On motion of Mr. King, seconded by Mr. Miller, the Board
approved a request from Ira Cleon Deaner for permission for a
proposed fence to encroach within a 16-foot drainage easement
across Lot 74, Hartley Village at Charter Colony, subject to
the execution of a license agreement. (It is noted a copy of
the plat is filed with the papers of this Board.)
Ayes: Barber, King, Humphrey and Miller.
Nays: None.
Absent: Warren.
05-395
O5/25/O5
8.C.7.d. FROM JEFFREY B. AND ADRIENNE FOSTER FOR A PROPOSED
FENCE TO ENCROACH WITHIN A THIRTY-FOOT DRAINAGE AND
SEWER EASEMENT, A TWENTY-FOOTANDVARIABLE WIDTH
SEWER EASEMENT, AN EIGHT-FOOT DRAINAGE EASEMENT,
AND AN EIGHT-FOOT EASEMENT ACROSS LOT 7, TANNER
VILLAGE, SECTION B AT CHARTER COLONY
On motion of Mr. King, seconded by Mr. Miller, the Board
approved a request from Jeffrey B. Foster and Adrienne Foster
for permission for a proposed fence to encroach within a 30-
foot drainage and sewer easement, a 20-foot and variable
width sewer easement, an eight-foot drainage easement, and an
eight-foot easement across Lot 7, Tanner Village, Section B
at Charter Colony, subject to the execution of a license
agreement. (It is noted a copy of the plat is filed with the
papers of this Board.)
Ayes: Barber, King, Humphrey and Miller.
Nays: None.
Absent: Warren.
8.C.7.e. FROM JOSEPH M. LEATHERWOOD TO INSTALL A PRIVATE
SEWER SERVICE WITHIN PRIVATE EASEMENTS TO SERVE
PROPERTY ON CELEBRATION AVENUE
On motion of Mr. King, seconded by Mr. Miller, the Board
approved a request from Joseph M. Leatherwood for permission
to install a private sewer service within private easements
to serve property at 4220 Celebration Avenue. (It is noted a
copy of the plat is filed with the papers of this Board.)
Ayes: Barber, King, Humphrey and Miller.
Nays: None.
Absent: Warren.
8.C.8. APPROVAL OF UTILITY CONTRACT FOR THE SUI4MER LAKE
SECTION 4 PROJECT
On motion of Mr. King, seconded by Mr. Miller, the Board
approved the following utility contract for Summer Lake,
Section 4, Contract Number 04-0161, which includes the
extension of 1,871 L.F. + of 24-inch oversized wastewater
lines: -
Developer:
Base Camp Holding, LLC
Contractor:
Castle Equipment Corporation
Contract Amount:
Estimated County Cost for Oversizing. $35,549.00
Estimated Developer Cost ......... $502,976.04
Estimated Total ............. $538,525.04
Code: Refunds thru Connections - Oversizing
5N-572VO-E4C
District: Matoaca
(It is noted a copy of the vicinity sketch is filed with the
papers of this Board.)
Ayes: Barber, King, Humphrey and Miller.
Nays: None.
Absent: Warren.
05-396
05/25/O5
8.Co9. ACCEPTANCE OF PARCELS OF LAND
8 .C. 9 .a. FOR THE EXTENSION OF BATTERY DANTZLER ROAD AND
BATTERY DANTZLER COURT FROM BERMUDA TRIANGLE
PROPERTY, L.P.
On motion of Mr. King, seconded by Mr. Miller, the Board
accepted the conveyance of a parcel of land containing a
total of 2.139 acres for the extension of Battery Dantzler
Road and Battery Dantzler Court from Bermuda Triangle
Property, L.P., and authorized the County Administrator to
execute the deed. (It is noted a copy of the plat is filed
with the papers of this Board.)
Ayes: Barber, King, Humphrey and Miller.
Nays: None.
Absent: Warren.
8.C.9.b. ALONG THE NORTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF NORTH
WOOLRID~E ROAD FROM REYNOLDS REAL ESTATE VENTUP~S,
LLC
On motion of Mr. King, seconded by Mr. Miller, the Board
accepted the conveyance of a parcel of land containing 0.047
acres along the north right of way line of North Woolridge
Road from Reynolds Estate Ventures, LLC, and authorized the
County Administrator to execute the deed. (It is noted a
copy of the plat is filed with the papers of this Board.)
Ayes: Barber, King, Humphrey and Miller.
Nays: None.
Absent: Warren.
8.C.9.c. ALONG THE WEST RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF NORTH ARCH ROAD
FROM VERDE INVESTMENTS, INCORPORATED
On motion of Mr. King, seconded by Mr. Miller, the Board
accepted the conveyance of a parcel of land containing 0.038
acres along the west right of way line of North Arch Road
(State Route 672) from Verde Investments, Incorporated, and
authorized the County Administrator to execute the deed. (It
is noted a copy of the plat is filed w~[th the papers of 'this
Board.)
Ayes: Barber, King, Humphrey and Miller.
Nays: None.
Absent: Warren.
8.C.9.d. ALONG THE NORTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF WEST HUNDI~D
ROAD FROM WEST HUNDRED ROAD REALTY, LLC
On motion of Mr. King, seconded by Mr. Miller, the Board
accepted the conveyance of a parcel of land containing 0.009
acres along the north right of way line of West Hundred Road
(State Route 10) from West Hundred Road Realty, LLC, and
authorized the County Administrator to execute the deed. (It
is noted a copy of the plat is filed with the papers of this
Board.)
Ayes: Barber, King, Humphrey and Miller.
Nays: None.
Absent: Warren.
05-397
05/25/O5
8.C.10.
APPROVAL OF A CHANGE ORDER FOR THE MIDLOTHIAN
TURNPIKE WATER LIME, PHASE 2 PROJECT
On motion of Mr. King, seconded by Mr. Miller, the Board
approved Change Order Number 3 for County Project 01-0202,
Midlothian Turnpike Water Line, Phase 2, for an increase of
$126,025.93, and authorized the County Administrator to
execute the necessary documents.
Ayes: Barber, King, Humphrey and Miller.
Nays: None.
Absent: Warren.
8.C.11. AWARD OF CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT TO MID EASTERN
BUILDERS, INCORPORATED FOR THE FALLING CREEK WASTE
WATER TREATMENT PLANT PRELIMINARY TREATMENT UNIT
IMPROVEMENTS AND PROCTORS CREEK WASTE WATER
TREATMENT PLANT PRELIMINARY TREATMENT UNIT
IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT
On motion of Mr. King, seconded by Mr. Miller, the Board
awarded a construction contract for County Project 03-0038,
Falling Creek Waste Water Treatment Plant Preliminary
Treatment Unit Improvements and Proctors Creek Waste Water
Treatment Plant Preliminary Treatment Unit Improvements, to
Mid Eastern Builders, Incorporated in the amount of $618,000;
transferred $350,000 from 5P-58350-000125R to 5P-58350-
030038R, and authorized the County Administrator to execute
the necessary documents.
Ayes: Barber, King, Humphrey and Miller.
Nays: None.
Absent: Warren.
8.C.12. ACCEPTANCE OF GRANTS AND APPROPRIATION OF FUNDS
8.C.12.&. FROM THE PART C PROGRAM FOR THE COMMUNITY SERVICES
BOARD FOR EARLY INTERVENTION SERVICES FOR INFANTS
AND TODDLERS WITH DEVELOPMENTAL MEEDS
On motion of Mr. King, seconded by Mr. Miller, the Board
accepted and appropriated $258,688 in state funds for the
FY2005 Infant and Toddler Connection Part C Program for
Chesterfield County and Planning District 14. (It is noted
no local match is required.)
Ayes: Barber, King, Humphrey and Miller.
Nays: None.
Absent: Warren.
8.C.12.b.
FROM THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY TO PURCHASE TERRORISM RELATED EQUIPMENT
FOR FIRST RESPONDER PREPAREDMESS
On motion of Mr. King, seconded by Mr. Miller, the Board
accepted and appropriated $246,376 in grant funds from the
United States Department of Homeland Security, State Homeland
Grant Program to provide equipment, training, planning and
05-398
05/25/05
exercises for first responders.
is required. )
(It is noted no local match
Ayes: Barber, King, Humphrey and Miller.
Nays: None.
Absent: Warren.
8.C.13. APPROPRIATION OF REVENUE AND EXPENDITURES FOR THE
CHESTERFIELD COMMUNITY SERVICES BOARD BUDGET
8 .C.13 .a.
TO ESTABLISH ANEW COMPREHENSIVE INTENSIVE
COMMUNITY TREATMENT SERVICE
On motion of Mr. King, seconded by Mr. Miller, the Board
appropriated $375,000 in Medicaid revenue and expenditures to
establish a new comprehensive Intensive Community Treatment
Service for adults with persistent or severe mental illness,
and established three full-time positions for the FY2006
Chesterfield Community Services Board budget.
Ayes: Barber, King, Humphrey and Miller.
Nays: None.
Absent: Warren.
8.C.13.b. TO BE USED FOR SELECTED ONE-TIME PURCHASES NEEDED
FOR A NEW DAY SERVICE SITE
On motion of Mr. King, seconded by Mr. Miller, the Board
appropriated $115,000 in revenue and expenditures to be used
for selected one-time purchases needed for a new day service
site as well as to assist with overall budget issues in the
Community Service Board's FY2005 budget.
Ayes: Barber, King, Humphrey and Miller.
Nays: None.
Absent: Warren.
8.C.1~. REQUEST TO QUITCLAIM A SIXTEEN-FOOT WATER EASEME~
ACROSS THE PROPERTY OF RIVERS BEND FTI, LLC
On motion of Mr. King, seconded by Mr. Miller, the Board
authorized the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors and the
County Administrator to execute a quitclaim deed to vacate a
16-foot water easement across the property of Rivers Bend
FTI, LLC. (It is noted a copy of the plat is filed with the
papers of this Board.)
Ayes: Barber, King, Humphrey and Miller.
Nays: None.
Absent: Warren.
8.C.15.
DESIGNATION OF FY2006 CHESTERFIELD ROAD FUND
(REVENUE SHARINg) PROJECTS
On motion of Mr. King, seconded by Mr. Miller, the Board
adopted the attached resolution designating Branders Bridge
Road (Carver Heights Drive to Bradley Bridge Road), Newbys
Bridge Road (Walmsley Boulevard to Falling Creek Bridge), and
Forest Hill Avenue (Huguenot Road to Choctaw Road) as the
05-399
05/25/05
county's FY2006 Chesterfield Road Fund
projects:
(Revenue Sharing)
WHEREAS, Section 33.1-75 of the Code of Virginia permits
the Commonwealth Transportation Board to make an equivalent
matching allocation to any County for designations by the
governing body of up to 25% or $500,000 whichever is greater
of funds received by it during the current fiscal year
pursuant to the "State and Local Fiscal Assistance Act of
1972" for use by the Commonwealth Transportation Board to
construct, maintain, or improve primary and secondary highway
systems within such County; and
WHEREAS, the Commonwealth Transportation Board has
modified the FY06 Revenue Sharing Program; and
WHEREAS, the Virginia Department of Transportation
(VDOT) has notified the County that $1 million is the maximum
amount of Chesterfield County funds that will be matched by
the State during FY06; and
WHEREAS, the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors
has appropriated $1 million for the Chesterfield Road Fund
with the adoption of the FY06 Capital Improvement Program.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Chesterfield
County Board of Supervisors allocates $1 million to be
matched by the State for the FY06 Chesterfield Road Fund
(Revenue Sharing Program).
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that
allocated to the following projects:
the matched funds be
$875,520
Branders Bridge Road (Carver Heights Drive
to Bradley Bridge Road)
Preliminary Engineering, Right-of-way, and
Construction
$437,760 - VDOT and $437,760 - County
$1,000,000
Newbys Bridge Road (Walmsley Boulevard to
Falling Creek Bridge)
Preliminary Engineering, Right-of-way,
and Construction
$500,000 - VDOT and $500,000 - County
$124,480
Forest Hill Avenue (from Huguenot Road
to Choctaw Road) Construction
$62,240 - VDOT and $62,240 - County
Ayes: Barber, King, Humphrey and Miller.
Nays: None.
Absent: Warren.
8.C.16. TRANSFER OF DISTRICT IMPROVEMENT FUNDS
8.C.16.a. FROM THE DALE DISTRICT IMPROVEMENT FUND TO THE
PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT TO PURCHASE A
STORAGE SHED FOR ATHLETIC EQUIPMENT AT THE HENING
ELEMENTARY SCHOOL SPORTS COMPLEX
On motion of Mr. King, seconded by Mr. Miller, the Board
transferred $10,000 from the Dale District Improvement Fund
05-A00
05/25/05
to the Parks and Recreation Department to purchase a storage
shed for athletic equipment at the Hening Elementary School
Sports Complex.
Ayes: Barber, King, Humphrey and Miller.
Nays: None.
Absent: Warren.
8.C.16.b. FROM T~E MIDLOTHIAN, MATOACA, DALE, BERMUDA AND
CLOVER HILL DISTRICT IMPROVEMENT FUNDS TO THE
EPPINGTON FOUNDATION TO COVER COSTS ASSOCIATED
WITH THE COLONIAL HERITAGE FAIR
On motion of Mr. King, seconded by Mr. Miller, the Board
transferred $300 each from the Midlothian, Matoaca, Dale,
Bermuda and Clover Hill District Improvement Funds ($1,500
total) to the Eppington Foundation to cover the costs
associated with the Eppington Foundation Colonial Heritage
Fair.
Ayes: Barber, King, Humphrey and Miller.
Nays: None.
Absent: Warren.
8.C.17. TRANSFER OF ROAD CASH PROFFER FUNDS FOR THE CHALKLEY
SHOULDER PROJECT
On motion of Mr. King, seconded by Mr. Miller, the Board
transferred $1,427,466 in road cash proffers from the
Centralia Road Improvement Project to the Chalkley Road
Shoulder Project and authorized the County Administrator to
proceed with the design, right-of-way acquisition,
environmental permits and advertisement for a construction
contract for the Chalkley Road Shoulder Project.
Ayes: Barber, King, Humphrey and Miller.
Nays: None.
Absent: Warren.
8.C.18. APPROPRIATION OF ADDITIONAL FUNDS FOR COMPREHENSIVE
SERVICES (CSA)
On motion of Mr. King, seconded by Mr. Miller, the Board
appropriated up to $206,900 in additional funds for
Comprehensive Services, of which $134,500 will be provided
from general fund year-end appropriations and $72,400 will be
provided by school appropriations.
Ayes: Barber, King, Humphrey and Miller.
Nays: None.
Absent: Warren.
8.C.19. APPROVAL AND RATIFICATION OF CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTS
FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A ~T' HANGAR AND A CORPORATE
HANGAR FOR CHESTERFIELD COUNTY AIRPORT TO ~2
CONTRACTING INCORPORATED, TO EVANS CONSTRUCTION
COMPANY AND TO MANNING CONSTRUCTION COMPANY
On motion of Mr. King, seconded by Mr. Miller, the Board
ratified the County Administrator's execution of contracts
05-~01
O5/25/O5
with 42 Contracting Incorporated and Evans Construction
Company for the construction of a 'T' hangar and a corporate
hangar at the Chesterfield County Airport.
And, further, the Board approved a construction contract to
Manning Construction Company in the amount of $149,000 and to
Evans Construction Company in the amount of $107,112 for the
hangar projects.
Ayes: Barber, King, Humphrey and Miller.
Nays: None.
Absent: Warren.
8.C.21. AUTHORIZATION TO TRANSFER THE SUBORDINATION OF TH~
COUNTY'S REVERSIONARY INTEREST AT LUCY CORR NURSING
HOME TO REFINANCED DEBT
On motion of Mr. King, seconded by Mr. Miller, the Board
transferred the subordination of the county's reversionary
interest at Lucy Corr Nursing Home to refinanced debt.
Ayes: Barber, King, Humphrey and Miller.
Nays: None.
Absent: Warren.
The following item was removed from the Consent Agenda for
Board discussion:
8.C.20. INITIATION OF AN APPLICATION TO REZONE CERTAIN
PARCELS LOCATED WITHIN THE ROUTE 288 CORRIDOR PLAN
FROM AGRICULTURAL TO i-2 WITH A CONDITIONAL USE
PLANNED DEVELOPMENT TO PERMIT ORDINANCE EXCEPTIONS
Mr. Ramsey stated the county spent a considerable amount of
time developing the Route 288 Corridor Plan, which offers
significant future economic development opportunities. He
further stated the county is at a disadvantage in competing
in the economic development environment because very little
of the property designated for business development has
actually been zoned. He stated staff has reviewed the issue
and is recommending that the Board of Supervisors initiate
the zoning of the business property in the northern area of
the Route 288 Corridor to enhance the county's position to
compete in the economic development world.
Mr. Barber stated, as a result of Senator Watkins' efforts,
the rezoning request will include additional land surrounding
the Watkins property, which could result in much more
comprehensive development of the Route 288 Corridor and will
set the tone for development in the area for many years.
He noted that this area and the Meadowville area will be the
economic engine for our children's livelihood. He stated he
feels very strongly that the county has a good land use plan,
and he wants staff to treat this like any other zoning case
with the proper scrutiny and long-term concessions. He
further stated, although he realizes the process will be
burdensome, he believes the county will be much better served
by rezoning this property in a comprehensive manner.
Mr. Barber then made a motion, seconded by Mr. King, for the
Board to authorize initiation of an application to rezone
05-402
05/25/05
certain parcels located within the Route 288 Corridor Plan
from Agricultural to I-2 with a Conditional Use Planned
Development to permit ordinance exceptions; appoint James
Dunn and Faith McClintic as the Board's agents; and waive the
requirement for rezoning disclosure affidavits.
Mr. King thanked Mr. Ramsey and Mr. Barber for taking the
initiative to bring this request before the Board.
Mr. Miller stated he will certainly support the motion,
although he has concerns with the high fashion mall referred
to in the notes of the Route 288 Corridor Plan, indicating
that he does not believe government should be in the business
of choosing the particular class of business.
Mr. Barber stated he believes brand names were placed in the
Plan as an example of types and styles.
Mr. Barber then called for a vote on his motion, seconded by
Mr. King, for the Board to authorize initiation of an
application to rezone certain parcels located within the
Route 288 Corridor Plan from Agricultural to I-2 with a
Conditional Use Planned Development to permit ordinance
exceptions; appoint James Dunn and Faith McClintic as the
Board's agents; and waive the requirement for rezoning
disclosure affidavits. (It is noted a list of the properties
included in the application is filed with the papers of !5his
Board.)
Ayes: Barber, King, Humphrey and Miller.
Nays: None.
Absent: Warren.
9. HEARINGS OF CITIZENS ON UNSCHEDULED MATTERS OR CLAIMS
0 MR. ROBERT HERNDON HAS REQUESTED THE OPPORTUNITY TO SP]~%K
RE~ARDIN~ "REINSTATIN~ MASS TRANSIT IN CHESTERFIELD
COUNTY"
Mr. Robert Herndon, a resident of the Matoaca District,
stated the Federal Highway Administration through Congestion
Mitigation Air Quality (CEMAQ) funds and the Virginia
Department of Transportation (VDOT) have set aside $1,035,000
for Chesterfield County for a three-year period for the
purpose of bus service expansion in the county. He noted
this plan is included in VDOT's Six-Year Improvement Program,
which was presented to the Richmond Metropolitan Planning
Organization on May 12, 2005. He stated the proposal called
for GRTC to begin service at the Lowes at Winterpock and
Route 360 in July with three buses in the morning and tlhree
in the evening. He further stated, on a daily basis, 62,000
vehicles travel Route 360 from Spring Run Road to Route 288;
35,000 travel from Baldwin Creek Road to Spring Run Road; and
more than 30,000 vehicles per day travel from the county into
the City of Richmond and an additional 25,000-plus going into
Henrico County. He expressed concerns that additional
development approved in the Route 360 Corridor will increase
the already-stressed transportation infrastructure by an
additional 80,000-plus vehicle trips per day. He stated mass
transit will reduce the need to use green space for each new
development in the county; reduce EMS response times; protect
air and water quality; and reduce inordinate traffic delays.
05-403
05/25/05
He further stated adding more pavement may help the flow of
traffic, but it will also increase rather than mitigate
vehicular traffic. He stated the funding represents an
awesome opportunity for the county and urged the Board to
accept the proposal presented to the Metropolitan Planning
Organization to provide a much needed service to the county;
reduce citizens' transportation costs to and from work; and
provide the county with an economic tool. He suggested that
the Board appoint a commission to study mass transit in the
county and present to the Board creative ways to develop a
first-class public transportation system that would serve
county residents, inclusive of all age, abilities, income
levels and all magisterial districts. He volunteered to
serve on such a commission, if the Board desires, and thanked
the Board for the opportunity to speak on this subject.
10. REPORTS
10.A. REPORT ON DEVELOPER WATER AND SEWER CONTRACTS
10.B. REPORT ON THE STATUS OF GENERAL FUND BALANCE, RESERVE
FOR FUTURE CAPITAL PROJECTS, DISTRICT IMPROVEMENT
10 .C.
10 .D.
FUNDS AND LEASE PURCHASES
ROADS ACCEPTED INTO THE STATE SECONDARY SYSTEM
REPORT OF PLANNING COMMISSION SUBSTANTIAL ACCORD
DETERMINATION ON ALLTEL COMPANY - LOCATION
COMMONWEALTH CENTER, COMMUNICATIONS TOWER (CASE
05PD0316)
Mrs. Humphrey requested that information regarding traffic
shed funding data be provided for road projects in future
reports.
On motion of Mrs. Humphrey, seconded by Mr. King, the Board
accepted the following reports: a Report on Developer Water
and Sewer Contracts; a Report on the Status of General Fund
Balance, Reserve for Future Capital Projects, District
Improvement Funds and Lease Purchases; a Report of the
Planning Commission Substantial Accord Determination on
Alltel Company - Location Commonwealth Center, Communications
Tower (Case 05PD0316).
And, further, the following roads were accepted into the
State Secondary System:
ADDITION LENGTH
KING'S FARM, SECION 2
(Effective 3/30/2005)
Brewton Way (Route 5860) - From Post Mill Drive
(Route 5859) to 0.05 mile southeast of Post Mill
Drive (Route 5859)
0.05 Mi.
Pond Chase Court (Route 5858) - From Post Mill
Drive (Route 5859) to Cul-de-sac
0.11 Mi.
Pond Chase Drive (Route 5742) - From 0.01 mile
south of Cotesworth Way (Route 5741) to 0.08
mile south of Cotesworth Way (Route 5741)
0.07 Mi.
05-40&
05/25/05
Post Mill Drive (Route 5859) - From Pond Chase
Drive (Route 5742) to Brewton Way IRoute 5860)
Post Mill Drive (Route 5859) - From Brewton Way
(Route 5860) to 0.01 mile southwest of Brewton
Way (Route 5860)
KING'S FARM, SECTION 4
(Effective 3/30/2005)
Brewton Terrace (Route 5861) - From Brewton Way
(Route 5860) to Cul-de-sac
Brewton Way (Route 5860) - From Brewton Terrace
(Route 5861) to 0.10 mile southeast of Brewton
Terrace (Route 5861)
Brewton Way (Route 5860) - From 0.05 mile
southeast of Post Mill Drive (Route 5859) to
Brewton Terrace (Route 5861)
TARRINGTON, SECTION 1
(Effective 3/30/2005)
Langford Drive (Route 5845) - From Langford
Lane (Route 5844) to Penhurst Road (Route
5846)
Langford Drive (Route 5845) - From Markfield
Drive (Route 5847) to 0.05 mile north of
Markfield Drive (Route 5847)
Langford Drive (Route 5845) - From Penhurst
Road (Route 5846) To Markfield Drive (Route
5847)
Langford Drive (Route 5845) - From Langford
Lane (Route 5844) to Penhurst Road (Route
5846)
Langford Lane (Route 5844) - From Ashwell
Drive (Route 5843) to Langford Drive (Route
5845)
Markfield Drive (Route 5847) - From Langford
Drive (Route 5845) to 0.02 mile east of
Langford Drive (Route 5845)
TARRINGTON, SECTION 1
(Effective 3/30/2005)
Penhurst Road (Route 5846) - From Langford
Drive (Route 5485) to Langford Drive (Route
5845)
Penhurst Road (Route 5846) - From Ashwell
Drive (Route 5843) to Langford Drive (Route
5845)
05-405
0.23 Mi.
0.01 Mi.
0.07 Mi.
0.10 Mi.
0. O4 Mi.
0 10 Mi
0 05 Mi
0 06 Mi
0 10 Mi
0 07 Mi
0 02 Mi
0.13 Mi.
0.05 Mi.
05/25/05
TARRINGTON, SECTION 1 AT ASHWELL DRIVE
(Effective 3/25/2005)
Ashwell Drive (Route 5843) - From Ashwell
Drive (Route 5843) to 0.15 mile east of
Ashwell Drive (Route 5843)
Ashwell Drive (Route 5843) - From Robious
Road (Route 711) to 0.18 mile east of
Robious Road (Route 711)
Ashwell Drive (Roundabout Circle) (Route
5843) - From Ashwell Drive (Route 5843) to
0.05 mile southwest of Ashwell Drive (Route
5843)
Ashwell Drive (Roundabout) (Route 5843) -
From Ashwell Drive (Route 5843) to 0.05 mile
northeast of Ashwell Drive (Route 5843)
TARRINGTON, SECTION 2
(Effective 3/25/2005)
Calcutt Drive (Route 5849) - From Calcutt Lane
(Route 5848) to Grendon Drive (Route 5850)
Calcutt Drive (Route 5849) - From Calcutt Lane
(Route 5848) to Cul-de-sac
Calcutt Lane (Route 5848) - From Ashwell Drive
(Route 5843) to Calcutt Drive (Route 5849)
Grendon Drive (Route 5850) - From Grendon Lane
(Route 5852) to Calcutt Drive (Route 5849)
Grendon Drive (Route 5850) - From Cul-de-sac
to Grendon Lane (Route 5852)
Grendon Drive (Route 5850) - From Hedgeway
Place (Route 5851) to 0.08 mile southeast of
Hedgeway Place (Route 5851)
Grendon Drive (Route 5850) - From Calcutt
Drive (Route 5849) to Hedgeway Place (Route
5851)
Grendon Drive (Loop) (Route 5850) - From 0.08
mile southeast of Hedgeway Place (Route 5851)
to 0.08 mile southeast of Hedgeway Place
(Route 5851)
Grendon Lane (Route 5852) - From Grendon Drive
(Route 5850) to Ashwell Drive (Route 5843)
Hedgeway Place (Route 5851) - From Grendon
Drive (Route 5850) to Cul-de-sac
EDGEWATER, SECTION 6
(Effective 4/15/2005)
Mariners Way (Route 5852) - From Windjammer
Drive (Route 5853) to Cul-de-sac
05-406
0.15 Mi.
0.18 Mi.
0.05 Mi.
0.05 Mi.
0.09 Mi.
0.09 Mi.
0.08 Mi.
0.09 Mi.
0.04 Mi.
0.08 Mi.
0.07 Mi.
0.13 Mi.
0.07 Mi.
0.06 Mi.
0.10 Mi.
05/25/05
Mariners Way (Route 5852) - From Woolridge
Road (Route 668) to 0.12 mile east on
Mariners Way (Route 5852)
Tidal Drive (Route 5855) - From Windjammer
Drive (Route 5853) to Water Shore Drive
(Route 5856)
Water Shore Drive (Route 5856) - From
Windjammer Drive (Route 5853) to Tidal /)rive
(Route 5855)
Windjammer Drive (Route 5853) - From Water
Shore Drive (Route 5856) to Windjammer Way
(Route 5854)
Windjammer Drive (Route 5853) - From Mariners
Way (Route 5852) to Water Shore Drive (Route
5856)
Windjammer Drive (Route 5853) - From Windjammer
Way (Route 5854) to Tidal Drive (Route !5855)
Windjammer Way (Route 5854) - From Windjammer
Drive (Route 5853) to 0.02 mile north of
Windjammer Drive (Route 5853)
EDGEWATER, SECTION 7
(Effective 4/15/2005)
Mariners Place (Route 5857) - From Mariners
Way (Route 5852) to Cul-de-sac
JESSUP FARMS, SECTION G
(Effective 4/29/2005)
Bareback Drive (Route 5863) - From Fairpines
Road (Route 2130) to Bareback Trail (Route 5864)
Bareback Terrace (Route 5864) - From Bareback
Drive (Route 5863) to west to Cul-de-sac
Bareback Terrace (Route 5864) - From Bareback
Drive (Route 5863) to east to Cul-de-sac
Fairpines Lane (Route 5862) - From Calavettie
Drive (Route 5439) to Fairpines Road (Route
2130)
Fairpines Road (Route 2130) - From Bareback
Drive (Route 5863) to Cul-de-sac
Fairpines Road (Route 2130) - From Fairpines
Lane (Route 5862) to Bareback Drive (Route 5863)
Fairpines Road (Route 2130) - From Fairpines
Road (Route 2130) to Fairpines Lane (Route 5862)
Ayes: Barber, King, Humphrey and Miller.
Nays: None.
Absent: Warren.
05-407
0.12 Mi.
0.08 Mi.
0.15 Mi.
0.14 Mi.
0.04 Mi.
0.06 Mi.
0.02 Mi.
0.06 Mi.
0.06 Mi.
0.08 Mi.
0.15 Mi.
0.13 Mi.
0.04 Mi.
0.07 Mi.
0.04 Mi.
05/25/05
11 · DINNER
On motion of Mr. King, seconded by Mr. Barber, the Board
recessed to the Administration Building, Room 502, for
dinner.
Ayes: Barber, King, Humphrey and Miller.
Nays: None.
Absent: Warren.
Reconvening:
12. INVOCATION
Reverend James H. Carey, Jr., Pastor
Methodist Church, gave the invocation.
of Bethia United
13. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG OF THE UNITED STATES OF
AMERICA
Eagle Scout Michael Entwistle led the Pledge of Allegiance to
the flag of the United States of America.
14. RESOLUTIONS AND SPECIAL REC0~NITIONS
i~.A. RECOGNIZING MS. SUZANNE FLEMING, SOCIAL SERVICES
DEPARTMENT, UPON HER RETIREMENT
Ms. Snead introduced Ms. Suzanne Fleming who was present to
receive the resolution.
On motion of the Board, the following resolution was adopted:
WHEREAS, Ms. Suzanne Fleming has devoted 31 years of
service to the families and citizens of Chesterfield and
Colonial Heights; and
WHEREAS, Ms. Fleming has represented the Social Services
Department and the community with pride in her work on a
statewide level through Governor's subcommittees, policy
development, and board memberships; and
WHEREAS, Ms. Fleming has represented the Virginia League
of Social Service Executives in speaking before numerous
legislative committees and served faithfully on the League's
Child Welfare Committee; and
WHEREAS, Ms. Fleming has consistently given of her
personal time and has shared her knowledge on county
committees and task groups; and
WHEREAS, Ms. Fleming was an early champion of
Chesterfield TQI in all phases of implementation and has
fully joined in strategic planning for the department; and
WHEREAS, Ms. Fleming has brought commitment and
enthusiasm to the successful operation of shelters during
times of community disasters; and
05-408
O5/25/O5
WHEREAS, Ms. Fleming has taken a leadership role. in
bringing issues of child protection to the community and
other professionals especially by her leadership of the Cihild
Abuse and Neglect Multidisciplinary Team; .and
WHEREAS, first and last, Ms. Fleming has tirelessly
advocated for department staff and supported their efforts in
all service programs;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chesterfield
County Board of Supervisors, this 25th day of May 21305,
publicly recognizes Ms. Suzanne Fleming, expresses
appreciation for her total devotion to the difficult work of
public service and wishes her well in the fulfilling years to
come.
Ayes: Barber, King, Humphrey and Miller.
Nays: None.
Absent: Warren.
Mrs. Humphrey presented the executed resolution to Ms.
Fleming, accompanied by members of her family, expressed
appreciation for her dedicated service~ and congratulated her
on her retirement.
Mr. Miller presented a Jefferson Cup to Ms. Fleming and
stated she epitomizes the best of leadership in gover~nent
services.
Ms. Fleming expressed appreciation to the Board for the
wonderful memories she is taking with her and for the
professional and personal growth opportunities she received
as a Chesterfield County employee. She thanked the Social
Services staff and leadership for their support over the
years.
A standing ovation followed.
14.B. RECO~NIZiN~ MAY 15-21, 2005, AS "EMERGENCY MEDICAL
SERVICES WEEK" IN CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
Chief Mauger introduced Mr. Les Ryan and Mr. Aaron Chambers,
representing Ettrick-Matoaca Volunteer Rescue Squad; Mr. Rick
Morrow, Mr. Kelly Quinn, Mr. Len Matthews, Ms. Judy Matthews
and Ms. Judy Langford, representing Forest View Volunteer
Rescue Squad; Ms. Kathy Eubank, representing Manchester
Volunteer Rescue Squad; Mr. Gary Frame and Ms. Micky Grodski,
representing Bensley-Bermuda Volunteer Rescue Squad; Captain
Joe Newsome, representing Chesterfield Fire and Emergency
Medical Services; and Ms. Tammy Higgins, representing the
Emergency Communications Center, who were present to receive
the resolution.
On motion of the Board, the following resolution was adopted:
WHEREAS, emergency medical services is a vital public
service; and
WHEREAS, the members of emergency medical services teams
are ready to provide lifesaving care to those in need twenty-
four hours a day, seven days a week; and
05-409
O5/25/O5
WHEREAS, access to quality emergency care dramatically
improves the survival and recovery rate of those who
experience sudden illness or injury; and
WHEREAS, injury prevention and the appropriate use of
the emergency medical system will help reduce national health
care costs; and
WHEREAS, emergency medical services providers have
traditionally served as the safety net of America's health
care system; and
WHEREAS, emergency medical services teams consist of
emergency physicians, emergency nurses, emergency medical
technicians, paramedics, firefighters, communications
officers, educators, administrators, and others; and
WHEREAS, the members of emergency medical services
teams, whether career or volunteer, engage in many hours of
specialized training and continuing education to enhance
their lifesaving skills; and
WHEREAS, the citizens and guests of Chesterfield County
benefit daily from the knowledge and skills of these highly
trained individuals; and
WHEREAS, it is appropriate to recognize the value and
the accomplishments of the emergency medical services
providers from Chesterfield Fire and EMS, Chesterfield
County's Emergency Communications Center, and the Volunteer
Rescue Squads of Bensley-Bermuda, Ettrick-Matoaca, Forest
View, and Manchester.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Chesterfield
County Board of Supervisors publicly recognizes the week of
May 15-21, 2005, as "Emergency Medical Services Week."
Ayes: Barber, King, Humphrey and Miller.
Nays: None.
Absent: Warren.
Mr. King presented executed resolutions to representatives
from each of the rescue squads, Chesterfield Fire and EMS,
and the Emergency Communications Center, and expressed
appreciation for the valuable services provided by the
county's emergency medical services providers.
Each of the representatives expressed appreciation to the
Board for its support of emergency medical services in
Chesterfield County.
14.C. RECOGNIZING BOY SCOUTS UPON ATTAINING TW~ RANK OF
EAGLE SCOUT
14.C.1. MR. THOMAS WALTON-CALE, CLOVER HILL DISTRICT
14.C.2. MR. MICHAEL ENTWISTLE, BERMUDA DISTRICT
14.C.3. MR. JAMES RICHARD MANI, MATOACA DISTRICT
14.C.4. MR. THOMAS SAUNDERS, MIDLOTHIAN DISTRICT
Mr. Hammer introduced Mr. Thomas Walton-Cale, Mr. Michael
Entwistle, Mr. James Mani and Mr. Thomas Saunders, who were
present to receive the resolutions.
05-410
05/25/05
On motion of the Board, the following resolution was adopted:
WHEREAS, the Boy Scouts of ~nerica was incorporated by
Mr. William D. Boyce on February 8, 11910, and was chartered
by Congress in 1916; and
WHEREAS, the Boy Scouts of America was founded to build
character, provide citizenship training and promote physical
fitness; and
WHEREAS, after earning at least twenty-one merit badges
in a wide variety of skills including leadership, service and
outdoor life, serving in a leadership position in a troop,
carrying out a service project beneficial to their community,
being active in the troop, demonstrating Scout spirit, and
living up to the Scout Oath and Law
Mr. Thomas Walton-Cale, Troop 800, sponsored by Bethel
Baptist Church; Mr. Michael Robert Entwistle, Troop 877,
sponsored by Chester Presbyterian Church; Mr. James Richard
Mani, Troop 806, sponsored by Woodlake United Methodist
Church; and Mr. Thomas M. Saunders, Troop 829, sponsored by
Saint Matthias' Episcopal Church, have accomplished tlhose
high standards of commitment and have reached the long-sought
goal of Eagle Scout which is received by only four percent of
those individuals entering the Scouting movement; and
WHEREAS, growing through their experiences in Scouting,
learning the lessons of responsible citizenship, and
endeavoring to prepare themselves fozl roles as leaders in
society, Thomas, Michael, James and Thomas have distinguished
themselves as members of a new generation of prepared young
citizens of whom we can all be very proud.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chesterfield
County Board of Supervisors, this 25th day of May 2005, hereby
extends its congratulations to Mr. Thomas Walton-Cale, Mr.
Michael Robert Entwistle, Mr. James Richard Mani and Mr.
Thomas M. Saunders, and acknowledges the good fortune of the
county to have such outstanding young men as its citizens.
Ayes: Barber, King, Humphrey and Miller.
Nays: None.
Absent: Warren.
Mr. Barber presented executed resolutions and patches tc Mr.
Walton-Cale, Mr. Entwistle, Mr.. Mani and Mr. Saunders,
accompanied by members of their families, congratulated them
on their outstanding achievement, and wished them well in
their future endeavors.
Mr. Saunders expressed appreciation to the Board for the
recognition and also to his parents and scoutmasters for
their support.
Mr. Mani expressed appreciation to the Board for the
recognition and also to his parents, God and others for their
support.
Mr. Walton-Cale expressed appreciation to the Board for the
recognition and also to his parents, members of his troop and
scoutmaster for their support.
05-~11
05/25/05
Mr. Entwistle expressed appreciation to the Board for the
recognition and also to Chester Presbyterian Church and
others for their support.
15. REQUESTS FOR MANUFACTURED HOME PERMITS AND REZONING
PLACED ON THE CONSENT AGENDA TO BE HEARD IN THE
FOLLOWING ORDER~ - WITHDRAWALS/DEFERRALS - CASES WHERE
THE APPLICANT ACCEPTS THE RECOMMENDATION AND THERE
IS NO OPPOSITION - CASES WHERE THE APPLICANT DOES NOT
ACCEPT THE RECOMMENDATION AND/OR THERE IS PUBLIC
OPPOSITION WILL BE HEARD AT SECTION 17
05SN0185
In Midlothian Magisterial District, COMMERCIAL LAND
DEVELOPMENT requests rezoning and amendment of zoning
district map from Agricultural (A) to General Industrial (I-
2) with Conditional Use to permit commercial uses and
Conditional Use Planned Development to allow exceptions to
Ordinance requirements. The density of such amendment will
be controlled by zoning conditions or Ordinance standards.
The Comprehensive Plan suggests the property is appropriate
for light industrial/flex uses. This request lies on 35.1
acres fronting approximately 1,100 feet on the south line of
Midlothian Turnpike, also fronting in two (2) places for a
total of approximately 450 feet on the west line of Otterdale
Road and located in the southwest quadrant of the
intersection of these roads. Tax IDs 720-709-6011 and 721-
709-2704 and 3240 (Sheet 5).
Mr. Turner stated Mr. Barber has requested that Case 05SN0185
be remanded to the Planning commission
Mr. Jim Theobold was present representing the applicant.
Mr. Barber requested that, as soon as the issues of the case
have been thoroughly addressed, the Planning Commission
consider suspending its rules and place the request on its
next agenda. He also requested that the case be double
advertised and placed on the Board's agenda as soon as
possible following the Planning Commission's hearing of the
case.
Mr. Barber called for public comment.
No one came forward to speak to the remand request.
On motion of Mr. Barber, seconded by Mr. Miller, the Board
remanded Case 05SN0185 to the Planning Commission.
Ayes: Barber, King, Humphrey and Miller.
Nays: None.
Absent: Warren.
05SN0181
In Bermuda Magisterial District, JOHN W. ROBERTS requests
rezoning and amendment of zoning district map from General
Industrial (I-2) to General Business (C-5). The density of
such amendment will be controlled by zoning conditions or
05-412
O5/25/O5
Ordinance standards. The Comprehensive Plan suggests the
property is appropriate for commercial use. This request
lies on 7.0 acres fronting approximately 900 feet on the
northwest line of Woods Edge Road across from Walthall
Industrial Parkway. Tax ID 802-637-3630 (Sheet 35).
Mr. Turner presented a summary of Case 05SN0181 and stated
the Planning Commission and staff recommended approval and
acceptance of the proffered conditions.
Mr. Dean Hawkins, representing the applicant,
recommendation is acceptable.
stated the
Mr. Barber called for public comment.
No one came forward to speak to the request.
On motion of Mr. King, seconded by Mr. Barber, the Board
approved Case 05SN0181 and accepted the following proffered
conditions:
Prior to any site plan approval, forty-five (45) feet of
right of way along the north side of Woods Edge Road,
measured from the centerline of that part of Woods Edge
Road immediately adjacent to the property, shall, be
dedicated, free and unrestricted, to and for the County
of Chesterfield. (T)
o
Direct access from the property to Woods Edge Road shall
be limited to one (1) entrance/exit generally located
towards the western part o~ the property. The
Transportation Department may modify this condition to
allow one (1) additional entrance/exit to Woods Edge
Road, generally located at the eastern property line.
This additional entrance/exit shall only be permitted
if, among other things, the westernmost access that
serves Bethesda Baptist Church (Tax ID 802-637-5658) is
closed as determined by the Transportation Department.
The exact location of these entrances/exits shall be
determined by the Transportation Department. (T)
o
Prior to the issuance of an occupancy permit, the
Owner/Developer shall ]De responsible for the
construction of additional pavement along Woods Edge
Road at each approved access to provide right and left
turn lanes, based on Transportation Department
standards. The Owner/Developer shall dedicate, free and
unrestricted, to and for the benefit of the County of
Chesterfield, any additional right-of-way (or easements)
required for the improvements idemtified above. (T)
4. The public wastewater system shall be used. (U)
o
Except for timbering approved by the Virginia State
Department of Forestry for the purpose of removing dead
or diseased trees, there shall be no timbering on the
Property until a Land Disturbance Permit has been issued
by the Environmental Engineering Department and the
approved devices installed. (EE)
6. Permitted uses shall be limited to the following:
a. Hotels
05-413
O5/25/O5
bo
Uses permitted by right in the Light Industrial (I-
l) District
Two (2) restaurants, only one (1) of which may be a
fast food restaurant (T&P)
Ayes: Barber, King, Humphrey and Miller.
Nays: None.
Absent: Warren.
05SN0197
In Dale Magisterial District, KENNETH W. BROADWATER requests
rezoning and amendment of zoning district map from
Agricultural (A) to Residential (R-12). Residential use of
up to 3.63 units per acre is permitted in a Residential (R-
12) District. The Comprehensive Plan suggests the property
is appropriate for residential use of 2.51 to 4.0 units per
acre. This request lies on 8.9 acres fronting approximately
850 feet on the south line of Little Creek Lane,
approximately 180 feet west of Meadwood Circle, also fronting
approximately 300 feet on the north line of Watchrun Drive
across from Watchrun Court. Tax IDs 779-682-5326, 6825 and
7162 (Sheets 12 and 18).
Mr. Turner presented a summary of Case 05SN0197 and stated
the Planning Commission and staff recommended approval and
acceptance of the proffered conditions.
Mr. Wayne Toy, representing
recommendation is acceptable.
the applicant, stated the
Mr. Barber called for public comment.
No one came forward to speak to the request.
On motion of Mr. Miller, seconded by Mr. King, the Board
approved Case 05SN0197 and accepted the following proffered
conditions:
1. Public water and wastewater systems shall be used. (U)
The applicant, subdivider, or assignee(s) shall pay the
following, for infrastructure improvements within the
service district for the property, to the County of
Chesterfield prior to the issuance of building permit:
$11,500.00 per dwelling unit, if paid prior to July
1, 2005; or
bo
The amount approved by the Board of Supervisors not
to exceed $11,500.00 per dwelling unit adjusted
upward by any increase in the Marshall and Swift
Building Index between July 1, 2004 and July 1 of
the fiscal year in which the payment is made if
paid after June 30, 2005.
C ·
In the event the cash proffer is not used for the
purpose for which proffered within 15 years of
receipt, the cash shall be returned in full to the
payer. (B&M)
o
The minimum gross floor area for one story dwelling
units shall be 1600 square feet and dwelling units with
05-414
O5/25/O5
more than one story shall have a minimum gross floor
area of 2000 square feet. (P)
4. Lots shall have a minimum of 12,000 square feet. (P)
o
The maximum number of lots shall be twenty-two (22).
(P)
6. Manufactured homes shall not be permitted. (P)
o
All exposed portions of the foundation of each new
dwelling unit and all exposed piers supporting front
porches shall be faced with brick or stone veneer.
(P&BI)
o
Other than a single private drive to serve the exis!zing
dwelling unit located on Tax ID 779-682-5326, there
shall be no access from the property to Watchlight Road.
o
In conjunction with recordation of the ini~5ial
subdivision plat, thirty (30) feet of right-of-way on
the south side of Little Creek Lane, measured from the
centerline of that part of Little Creek Lane immedia'Sely
adjacent to the property, shall be dedicated, free and
unrestricted, to and for the benefit of Chesterfield
County. (T)
10.
Ail accesses, including driveways, onto Little Creek
Lane shall be located to minimize lights from vehicles
exiting the property from shining directly into dwelling
units located across Little Creek Lane existing at time
of tentative subdivision review. At time of tentative
subdivision review, the exact locations of tlnese
accesses shall be approved by the Transportation
Department, and the access restriction shall be
identified and noted on the record plat. (T)
11.
In conjunction with the initial development on the
property, the ditch along the south side of Little Creek
Lane shall be relocated to provide a six (6) foot wide
shoulder, with modifications approved by the
Transportation Department. The developer shall dedicate,
free and unrestricted, to and for the benefit of
Chesterfield County any additional right-of-way (or
easement) required for this road improvement. (T)
12.
The developer shall provide a ten (10) year ]post
development storm water retention basin with a rel,ease
rate of a two (2) year predevelopment storm on the site
or improve the existing culverts at the end of Watclhrun
Drive to meet current drainage standards. (EE)
13.
Where buffers are required by Subdivision Ordinance on
Little Creek Lane, Watchlight Road and Watchrun drive,
the required landscaping shall be supplemented with two
(2) staggered rows of Leland cypress having an initial
minimum height of four (4) feet and planted ten (10)
feet on center. (P)
Ayes: Barber, King, Humphrey and Miller.
Nays: None.
Absent: Warren.
05.-415
05/25/05
05SN0198
In Clover Hill Magisterial District, FINER HOMES, INC.
requests rezoning and amendment of zoning district map from
Agricultural (A) to Residential (R-12). Residential use of
up to 3.63 units per acre is permitted in a Residential (R-
12) District. The Comprehensive Plan suggests the property
is appropriate for residential use of 1.0 - 2.5 units per
acre. This request lies on 22.9 acres and is known as 4701 N.
Bailey Bridge Road. Tax ID 741-678-5255 (Sheet 16).
Mr. Turner presented a summary of Case 05SN0198 and stated
the Planning Commission and staff recommended approval and
acceptance of the proffered conditions.
Mr. Wayne Toy, representing
recommendation is acceptable.
the applicant, stated the
Mr. Barber called for public comment.
No one came forward to speak to the request.
Mr. Barber stated, although Mr. Warren could not be present
at the meeting, he has indicated that he supports the
request.
Mr. Barber then made a motion, seconded by Mr. Miller, for
the Board to approve Case 05SN0198 and accept the following
proffered conditions:
1. Public water and wastewater systems shall be used. (U)
The applicant, subdivider, or assignee(s) shall pay the
following, for infrastructure improvements within the
service district for the property, to the County of
Chesterfield prior to the issuance of building permit:
$11,500.00 per dwelling unit, if paid prior to July
1, 2005; or
The amount approved by the Board of Supervisors not
to exceed $11,500.00 per dwelling unit adjusted
upward by any increase in the Marshall and Swift
Building Cost Index between July 1, 2004 and July 1
of the fiscal year in which the payment is made if
paid after June 30, 2005.
In the event the cash proffer is not used for the
purpose for which proffered within 15 years of receipt,
the cash shall be returned in full to the payer. (B and
M)
The minimum gross floor area for all dwelling units
shall be 1800 square feet. (P)
4. Manufactured homes shall not be permitted. (P)
Ail exposed portions of the foundation of each new
dwelling unit and all exposed piers supporting front
porches shall be faced with brick or stone veneer. (P)
05-&16
05/25/05
o
There shall be no access to Bailey Bridge Road except
for driveway which is serving exis~ing dwelling. (T)
7. There shall be no more than 2.5 lo~s per acre. P)
o
Except for timbering approved by the Virginza State
Department of Forestry for the purpose of removing dead
or diseased trees, there shall be no timbering on the
property until a land use disturbance permit has been
obtained from the Environmental Engineering Department
and approved devices have been ins~talled. (EE)
o
In conjunction with recordation of the initial
subdivision plat, forty-five (45) feet of right of way
along the eastern line of Bailey Bridge Road, measured
from the centerline of that part of the road immediately
adjacent to the property, shall be dedicated, free and
unrestricted, to and for the benefit of Chesterfield
County. (T)
Ayes: Barber, King, Humphrey and Miller.
Nays: None.
Absent: Warren.
05SR0215
In Clover Hill Magisterial District, BANNER CHRISTIAN SCHOOL
requests renewal of Conditional Use (Case 03SN0285) and
amendment of zoning district map to permit private school use
in an Agricultural (A) District. The density of such
amendment will be controlled by zoning conditions or
Ordinance standards. The Comprehensive Plan suggests the
property is appropriate for medium density residential use of
1.51 to 4.0 units per acre. This request lies on 8.3 acres
and is known as 1501 South Providence Road. Tax ID 755-698-
4828 (Sheet 7).
Mr. Turner presented a summary of Case 05SR0215 and stated
the Planning Commission and staff recommended approval
subject to conditions.
Mr. Tom Burkett, representing the applicant,
recommendation is acceptable.
stated the
Mr. Barber called for public comment.
No one came forward to speak to the request.
In response to Mrs. Humphrey's question, Mr. Turner stated
the applicant will not be required to return to the Board to
renew this conditional use permit again.
In response to Mr. Miller's question, Mr. Turner stated
Planning staff typically does not recommend a time limitation
in these sorts of uses, particularly if they are being tied
to the principal use of the property, which is the church.
He further stated the Planning Commission did not express any
concerns regarding a time limitation.
Mrs. Humphrey made a motion, seconded by Mr. King, for the
Board to approve Case 05SR0215 subject to conditions.
05.-417
05/25/05
Mr. Barber stated Mr. Warren also indicated his support of
this request.
Mr. Barber then called for a vote on the motion of Mrs.
Humphrey, seconded by Mr. King, for the Board to approve Case
05SR0215 subject to the following conditions:
1. The operation of the private school shall be in
conjunction with church use only. (P)
The following setback criteria shall apply to any
outdoor play fields, courts, swimming pools and similar
active recreational areas:
ao
With the exception of playground areas which
accommodate swings, jungle gyms or similar such
facilities, all active play fields, courts,
swimming pools or similar active recreational
facilities which could accommodate organized sports
such as football, soccer, basketball, etc., shall
be located a minimum of 100 feet from adjacent
properties to the north, south and east. Within
this setback, existing vegetation shall be
supplemented, where necessary, with landscaping or
other devices designed to achieve the buffering
standards for fifty (50) foot buffers in the Zoning
Ordinance.
bo
If active play fields, courts, swimming pools and
similar active recreational areas are setback more
than 100 feet from the adjacent properties to the
north, south and east, the landscaping or other
design features described in Condition 2.a. may be
modified by the Planning Department at the time of
site plan review. Such modification shall
accomplish mitigation of the visual and noise
impacts that sports or related activities have on
adjacent properties equivalent to the 100 foot
setback/landscaping requirements described in
Condition 2.a.
C o
Any new playground areas (swings, jungle gyms or
similar such facilities) shall be setback a minimum
of forty (40) feet from all property lines. (P)
Any new development to accommodate the use shall comply
with Emerging Growth District standards for Corporate
Office (0-2) Districts. (P)
Ayes: Barber, King, Humphrey and Miller.
Nays: None.
Absent: Warren.
05SN0218
In Dale Magisterial District, ALLIED (RICHMOND) LAND COMPANY
requests rezoning and amendment of zoning district map from
Corporate Office (0-2) to Residential Townhouse (R-TH) with
Conditional Use Planned Development to permit exceptions to
Ordinance requirements. Residential use of up to 8.00 units
per acre is permitted in a Residential Townhouse (R-TH)
District. The Comprehensive Plan suggests the property is
appropriate for residential use of 7.01 units per acre or
more. This request lies on 6.8 acres fronting approximately
05-~18
05/25/05
400 feet on the west line of Belmont Road, approximately 200
feet north of Stella Road. Tax ID 772-692-3366 (Sheet 11).
Mr. Turner presented a summary of Case 05SN0218 and stated
the Planning Commission and staff recommended approval
subject to one condition and acceptance of the proffered
conditions.
Mr. Miller inquired about the number of units proposed for
the development.
Mr. John Easter, representing the applicant, stated the
proposal includes a single access; therefore, the development
will be capped at 50 units, consistent with the density
specified in the Central Area Plan. He further stated the
recommendation is acceptable.
Mr. Barber called for public comment.
No one came forward to speak to the request.
On motion of Mr. Miller, seconded by Mr. King, the Board
approved Case 05SN0218, subject to the 'following condition:
A temporary model home (sales office) shall be permitted in a
modular office unit provided until such time as the first
occupancy permit for a dwelling unit is issued. (P)
And, further,
conditions:
the Board accepted the following proffered
The applicant in this rezoning case, pursuant to Section
15.2-2298 of the Code of Virginia (1950) (as amended) and the
Zoning Ordinance of Chesterfield County, for itself and its
successors or assigns (the ~Applicant"), proffers that the
property under consideration (the "Property") will be
developed according to the following proffers if, and only
if, the rezoning request submitted herewith is granted with
only those conditions agreed to by the owner and Applicant.
In the event this request is denied or approved with
conditions not agreed to by the Applicant, the proffers s[hall
immediately be null and void and of no further force, or
effect:
Master Plan. The textual statement dated April 11,
2005, shall be considered the Master Plan. (P)
Cash Proffer. The Applicant shall pay the followin!~ to
the County of Chesterfield prior to the issuance of each
building permit for infrastructure improvements within
the service district for the Property:
so
$11,500.00 per dwelling unit, if paid prior to July
1, 2005; or
bo
The amount approved by the Board of Supervisors not
to exceed $11,500.00 per dwelling unit adjusted
upward by any increase in the Marshall and Swift
Building Cost Index between July 1, 2004, and July
1 of the fiscal year in which the payment is made
if paid after June 30, 2005.
C o
Should Chesterfield County impose impact fees at
any time during the life of this development that
05-419
05/25/05
o
o
o
o
are applicable to the Property, the amount paid in
cash proffers shall be in lieu of, or credited
toward, but not in addition to, any impact fees, in
a manner determined by the County
do
In the event the cash payment is not used for the
purpose for which proffered within 15 years of
receipt, the cash shall be returned in full to the
payor. (B&M)
Timbering. Except for timbering approved by the
Virginia State Department of Forestry for the purpose of
removing dead or diseased trees, there shall be no
timbering on the Property until a land disturbance
permit has been obtained from the Environmental
Engineering Department and the approved devices have
been installed. (EE)
Dedication. In conjunction with recordation of the
initial subdivision plat, the Applicant shall dedicate,
free and unrestricted, to and for the benefit of
Chesterfield County, forty-five (45) feet of right-of-
way on the west side of Belmont Road, measured from the
centerline of that part of Belmont Road immediately
adjacent to the Property. (T)
Access Roads. Ail roads that accommodate general
traffic circulation through the development, as
determined by the Transportation Department, shall be
designed and constructed to VDOT standards and taken
into the State System. Setbacks from these roads shall
be as identified for special access streets pursuant to
Section 19-505(b) of the Zoning Ordinance. (T)
Sidewalks and Trails. Sidewalks and trails shall be
provided to facilitate pedestrian access within the
development. Sidewalks shall be provided generally
along each side of interior roads, including access
roads from Belmont Road into the Property, and along
that side of any common driveway or parking area on
which residential units front. Trails shall be provided
generally along the perimeter of the Property. (P)
Street Trees. Street trees in accordance with the
requirements of the Zoning Ordinance shall be installed
along each side of the interior roads and common
driveways, including entrance roads from Belmont Road
into the Property. If existing trees are maintained,
they may be counted toward this requirement. (P)
Tree Preservation Area. A twenty (20) foot tree
preservation strip shall generally be maintained along
the perimeter of the Property adjacent to Tax IDs
7726933904 and 7716927782. This tree preservation area
shall be located in common open space. Within this
area, trees that are six (6) inches in caliper or
greater shall be retained, except that the following
shall be permitted: removal of dead or diseased trees;
utilities crossing the preservation strip in a generally
perpendicular fashion; pedestrian trails; and water
quality or retention/detention facilities. (P)
Landscaping. Landscaping shall be provided around the
perimeter of all buildings, between buildings and
05-420
O5/25/O5
driveways, within medians, and within common areas not
occupied by recreational facilities or other structures.
Landscaping shall comply with the requirements of the
Zoning Ordinance Sections 19-516 through 19-518.
Landscaping shall be designed to: minimize the
predominance of building mass and paved areas; define
private spaces; and enhance the residential character of
the development. The Planning Department, at time of
subdivision tentative review~ shall approve the
landscaping plan with respect to the exact numbers,
spacing, arrangement, and species of plantings. (P)
10.
Building Materials. Dwelling units shall be constructed
with materials such as: brick or stone veneer;
composition, hardiplank, or vinyl siding; and 20-year
asphalt shingles. (P)
11.
Open Space/Recreation Area. A minimum of 0.75 acres of
open space/recreation shall be provided to provide a
focal point. Part of this area shall be ~hardscaped"
and have benches or other amenities that accommodate and
facilitate gatherings. A portion of the focal point may
include area devoted to best management/stormwater
facilities. (P)
12.
Minimum Dwelling Size. The minimum gross floor area for
dwelling units shall be 1,100 square feet. (P)
13.
Access to Belmont Road. Direct access from the Property
to Belmont Road shall be limited to one (1) public road.
The exact location of this access shall be approved by
the Transportation Department. (T)
14.
Garage Orientation. Each townhouse unit shall be
designed and constructed so that it either (a) has no
garage, or (b) has a garage that is side-loaded or rear-
loaded. (P)
Ayes: Barber, King, Humphrey and Miller.
Nays: None.
Absent: Warren.
05SN0244
In Bermuda Magisterial District, JUSTIN L. BURKEY, JR.
requests amendment to zoning (Case 78S154) and amendment of
zoning district map relative to vehicle storage. The density
of such amendment will be controlled by zoning conditions or
Ordinance standards. The Comprehensive Plan suggests the
property is appropriate for community commercial/mixed use
corridor use. This request lies in a General Business (C-5)
District on 1.0 acre and is known as 14910 Jefferson Davis
Highway. Tax ID 800-641-7479 (Sheet 34).
Mr. Turner presented a summary of Case 05SN0244 and stated
the Planning Commission and staff recommended approval.
Mr. Justin Burkey stated the recommendation is acceptable.
Mr. Barber called for Public co~nent.
No one came forward to speak to the re~]est.
05-~21
05/2:5/05
On motion of Mr. King, seconded by Mrs. Humphrey, the Board
approved Case 05SN0244.
Ayes: Barber, King, Humphrey and Miller.
Nays: None.
Absent: Warren.
05SN0229
In Dale Magisterial District, GEORGE P. EMERSON, JR. requests
rezoning and amendment of zoning district map from
Agricultural (A) to Residential (R-40). Residential use of
up to 1.09 units per acre is permitted in a Residential (R-
40) District. The Comprehensive Plan suggests the property
is appropriate for residential use of 1 to 5 acre lots,
suited to R-88 zoning. This request lies on twenty (20)
acres lying approximately 5,900 feet off the east line of
Nash Road, measured from a point approximately 1,175 feet
north of Eastfair Drive. Tax ID 769-652-7448 (Sheet 25).
Mr. Turner presented a summary of Case 05SN0229 and stated
the Planning Commission and staff recommended approval and
acceptance of the proffered conditions.
Discussion ensued relative to the potential number of new
dwelling units.
Mr. Allan Carmody, Budget Manager stated that, in determining
potential number of new dwelling units to be included in the
analysis of the case, staff uses average actual yields based
on a three-year rolling average of what has actually been
produced on properties for any kind of zoning. He further
stated, when an applicant proffers a specific number of units
or a specific density, the information will be provided in
the staff analysis.
Mr. George Emerson stated the recommendation is acceptable.
He stated the development will include approximately eight to
12 units.
Mr. Barber called for public comment.
No one came forward to speak to the request.
Mr. Miller stated it is unusual not to know the number of
units in a proposed development, but he does not believe it
will have a significant impact on the area.
Mr. Miller then made a motion, seconded by Mr. King, for the
Board to approve Case 05SN0229 and accept the following
proffered conditions:
In connection with the Zoning Application filed in connection
with the above property, the Applicant makes the following
proffers: The property owner and developer (the ~Developer"
in this zoning case, pursuant to 15.2-2298 of the Code of
Virginia (1950 as amended) and the Zoning Ordinance of
Chesterfield County for themselves an their successors or
assigns proffer that the development of the property known as
Tax ID No. 769-652-7448-00000 (the ~Property") under
consideration will be developed according to the following
05-422
05/25/05
conditions, if, and only if, the rezoning request applied for
herein is granted. In the event the request is denied[ or
approved with conditions not agreed to by the Developer, the
proffers and conditions shall immediately be null and void
and of no further force or effect. If the zoning is granted,
these proffers and conditions will supercede all proffers and
conditions not existing on the property.
1. (a)
If the existing dam and pond straddling an adjacent
property line is used for the project's BMP, then
it shall be retrofitted to meet current day
standards as outlined in the Environmental
Engineering reference manual to include, but not
limited to, property primary' spillways, emergency
spillways, and structural stability. The retrofit
design shall be performed by a qualified
professional and all remedial action shall take
place in conjunction with that phase of development
which is located within the dam's contributory
drainage way.
(b)
If the proper easements can not be obtained to
retrofit the existing facility, identified in item
l(a), upstream BMPs shall be constructed to render
the existing primary spillways adequate to pass the
ten (10) year storm. (EE)
o
Timbering. With the exception of timbering which has
been approved by the Virginia State Department of
Forestry for the purpose of removing dead or diseased
trees, there shall be no tirmbering on the Property until
a land disturbance permit has been obtained from the
Environmental Engineering Department, and the approved
devices have been installed.
Trail/Open Space along Swift Creek. An open space area,
a minimum of 150 feet in width shall be provided along
the length of Swift Creek from the northern to the
southern parcel boundaries. Within this area the
developer shall provide a trail.. The exact length,
width, and treatment of the trail shall be submitted to
the Department of parks and Recreation for comments.
The open space/trail shall be owned and maintained by
the homeowners Association. (P&R)
Covenants Conditions, and Restrictions. It is the
intention of the Applicant to incorporate the lots in
this parcel into the Community known as the Highlands
and to that end, restrictive covenants shall be recorded
in conjunction with the recordation of any subdivision
plat for the Property, which will subject said lots to
all the covenants, conditions, and restriction currently
in effect in all sections of the Highlands. (P)
5. Manufactured Homes.
ao
Manufactured homes shall not be permitted on the
Property. This proffered condition shall not be
interpreted to prohibit, the installation of any
mobile real estate sales office permitted on the
property by an approved Conditional Use, wlhich
shall not be used for ~elling purposes.
05-423
05/25/05
bo
The following shall be recorded as a restrictive
covenant in conjunction with the recordation of any
subdivision plat for the property: ~No manufactured
homes shall be allowed to become a residence,
temporary or otherwise." (P)
6. Cash Proffer.
ao
Except as otherwise provided herein, for each
single family residential dwelling unit developed,
the applicant, subdivider, or assignee(s) shall pay
$11,500.00 per unit to the County of Chesterfield,
prior to the time of issuance of a building permit,
for infrastructure improvements within the service
district for the Property if paid prior to July 1,
2005. Thereafter, such payment shall be the amount
approved by the Board of Supervisors not to exceed
$11,500.00 per unit as adjusted upward by any
increase in the Marshall and Swift Building Cost
Index between July 1, 2004 and July 1 of the fiscal
year in which the payment is made if paid after
June 30, 2005. The per dwelling unit cash proffer
amount shall be prorated among schools, roads,
libraries, fire stations, and parks and recreation
facilities by the County's Department of Budget and
Management.
bo
If any of the cash proffers are not expended for
the purposes designated by the Capital Improvement
Program within fifteen (15) years from the date of
payment, they shall be returned in full to the
payor. Should Chesterfield County impose impact
fees at any time during the life of the development
that are applicable to the Property, the amount
paid in cash proffers shall be in lieu of or
credited toward, but not in addition to, any impact
fees in a manner as determined by the County.
(B&M)
Ayes: Barber, King, Humphrey and Miller.
Nays: None.
Absent: Warren.
05SN0240
In Bermuda Magisterial District, BELLWOOD ROAD LLC requests
Conditional Use and amendment of zoning district map to allow
General Business (C-5) uses in a General Industrial (I-2)
District. The density of such amendment will be controlled
by zoning conditions or Ordinance standards. The
Comprehensive Plan suggests the property is appropriate for
general industrial use. This request lies on 38.1 acres
fronting approximately 850 feet on the south line of Bellwood
Road, also fronting approximately 650 feet on the east line
of Jefferson Davis Highway and located in the southeast
quadrant of the intersection of these roads. Tax ID 793-674-
2919 (Sheet 18).
Mr. Turner presented a summary of Case 05SN0240 and stated
the Planning Commission and staff recommended approval
subject to one condition.
Mr. Roger Habeck, representing the applicant,
recommendation is acceptable.
stated the
05-424
05/25/05
Mr. Barber called for public conm~ent.
Mr. Roger Habeck, speaking for the Chesterfield Chamber of
Commerce, the Jefferson Davis Enterprise Center and the
Jefferson Davis Association, stated approval of this request
will allow the enterprise center to relocate to a much more
positive location that will be far less expensive to operate
and provide much greater opportunity for start-up business in
the county. He further stated the facility is large enough
that businesses will not have relocate after a three-year
period. He stated this is a wonderful opportunity to grow
small business in the community.
There being no one else to speak to the request, the public
hearing was closed.
Mr. King expressed appreciation to the property owner and to
Mr. Habeck for this endeavor that will allow small businesses
to continue to grow in Chesterfield.
Mr. King then made a motion, seconded by Mr. Miller, for the
Board to approve Case 05SN0240 subject to the following
condition:
In addition to the uses permitted in the General Industrial
(I-2) District, those uses permitted by right or with
restrictions in the General Business ({2-5) District shall[ be
permitted. (P)
Ayes: Barber, King, Humphrey and Mil. ler.
Nays: None.
Absent: Warren.
05SN0192
In Clover Hill Magisterial District, SBF LLC requests
rezoning and amendment of zoning district map from
Agricultural (A) to Residential (R-12). Residential use of
up to 3.63 units per acre is permitted in a Residential (R-
12) District. The Comprehensive Plan suggests the property
is appropriate for residential use of 1.51 to 4.0 units per
acre. This request lies on 10.0 acres fronting approximately
400 feet on the northeast line of Reams Road, also fronting
approximately 600 feet on the southeast line of Arch iHill
Drive and located in the southeast quadrant of the
intersection of these roads. Tax IDs 752-700-2512 and 6421
(Sheet 6).
Ms. Darla Orr presented a summary of Case 05SN0192 and stated
staff recommended approval subject to the applicant
adequately addressing the impact of the proposed development
on capital facilities, noting that the proposed development
complies with the Northern Area Plan. She further sta~zed,
although the cash contribution is appropriate in dollar
amount to that which has consistently been accepted in
accordance with the Board's policy, it fails to address the
impact of the proposed development on schools, libraries,
parks and fire service. She stated the Planning Commission
recommended approval and acceptance of the proffered
conditions, noting that Proffered Condition 8 addresses
needed area road improvements.
05-425
05/25/05
In response to Mr. Miller's question, Ms. Orr clarified that
Proffered Condition 8, which includes a contribution towards
area road improvements in Traffic Shed 4, has been offered in
lieu of a cash proffer and does not offer cash to schools,
fire, parks or libraries.
Mr. Andy Scherzer, representing the applicant, stated
Proffered Condition 8 was offered as a result of
transportation concerns expressed by area residents. He
further stated, because the proposed development includes a
small number of lots, the dollar amount of the cash proffer
would be relatively small if divided among the various
capital facilities and therefore not significant for
individual capital facilities. He stated, because the
proposed development is an in-fill project and it is not
anticipated that other new developments would add cash
proffers for the area, the applicant created a critical mass
of money to address area road issues. He further stated the
Planning Commission saw the merit of Proffered Condition 8
and recommended approval of the request.
Mr. Barber called for public comment.
No one came forward to speak to the request.
Mr. Barber stated Mr. Warren assured him he was comfortable
with the request.
Mr. Miller stated, because schools in this area are under
capacity, the Planning Commission recommended approval and
there is no opposition to the request, he will support it.
Mr. Barber expressed concerns relative to the number of zoned
lots in this school zone that could change school capacity
numbers.
Ms. Cynthia Owens-Bailey stated it is not anticipated that
this request will have a major impact on schools.
Mr. Miller expressed concerns that, although small in-fill
developments may not individually impact schools,
incrementally over a long period of time they could impact
schools.
Ms. Owens-Bailey stated schools sees no capacity issues in
the area of the subject development in the short term.
Mr. Barber inquired whether this proffered condition could
set a precedent for other cases.
Mr. Micas referenced a recent zoning request along Nash Road
where the Board accepted a construction proffer in lieu of a
cash proffer to address important road concerns in the area.
He stated the amount of such a proffered condition must have
a rational relationship to the development itself, indicating
that the cash proffer amount in the Board's policy would be a
reasonable benchmark.
Mrs. Humphrey stated there have been past zoning cases where
cash proffers were grouped in one category or another. She
further stated she would like to hear from Mr. Warren before
accepting the proffered conditions offered by the applicant.
05-426
O5/25/O5
Mrs. Humphrey then made a motiont seconded by Mr. Miller, for
the Board to defer Case 05SN0192 until June 22, 2005.
Mr. Barber inquired whether the applicant had any issues 'with
a deferral.
Mr. Scherzer stated the applicant would accept a 30-day
deferral. He noted Reams Road has a higher accident rate per
trip than the highest intersection accident rate in the
county.
Mr. Barber inquired whether it is the applicant's intention
to apply the cash to improving the intersection of Reams and
Adkins Roads.
Mr. McCracken stated sufficient funding is available now to
address the Reams/Adkins Roads intersection, and additional
funding must be accumulated to address other areas of Reams
Road, including its intersections at Rosegill Road and
Wadsworth Drive.
Mr. Barber called for a vote on the motion of Mrs. Humphrey,
seconded by Mr. Miller, for the Board to defer Case 05SN0192
until June 22, 2005.
Ayes: Barber, King, Humphrey and Miller.
Nays: None.
Absent: Warren.
04SN0207
In Matoaca Magisterial District, DART II LLC requests
rezoning and amendment of zoning district map from
Agricultural (A) to Residential (R-15) with Conditional Use
Planned Development to permit exceptions to Ordinance
requirements. Residential use of up tc 2.9 units per acre is
permitted in a Residential (R-15) District. The
Comprehensive Plan suggests the property is appropriate for
single-family residential use of 2.0 units per acre or less.
This request lies on 302.6 acres fronting approximately 1,400
feet on the east line of Otterdale Road approximately 680
feet north of Woolridge Road, also fronting in two (2) places
for approximately 2,250 feet on the north line of Woolridge
Road approximately 1,400 feet east of Otterdale Road. Tax
IDs 708-675-1560; 708-677-8911; 709-6'75-6985; 709-676-0702,
5333, 6590 and 9324; 709-677-2520, 3264 and 3406; 709-678-
5743; 710-676-0704 and 1579; 710-677--3873; 7i0-678-Part of
7575; 711-677-9367; 711-678-4858; 711-!579-6522; and 712-679-
2887 (Sheet 15).
Ms. Orr presented a summary of Case 04SN0207 and stated an
addendum to Proffered Condition 3 provldes that a minimum of
200 lots will be developed with a reduced lot size and
incorporates the neo-traditional design and typical quality
standards. She provided details of permitted uses within
Tracts A, B, C and D of the subject property. She stated
staff recommended approval subject to the applicant
addressing the location of the commercial node, the focal
point acreage and garage orientation. She further stated,
except for the commercial node, the request conforms to the
Upper Swift Creek Plan. She stated the location of the
commercial node along Woolridge Road does not provide the
05-427
05/25/05
internal focus and the limited service or convenience area
that the Plan envisions. She further stated the request
fails to meet the typical standards established for reduced
lot developments because the focal point at the intersection
of the north/south road and Woolridge Road should be 0.75
acres, and the request also fails to fully minimize the
impact of garage doors facing the street. She noted the
applicant has addressed impacts of the development on capital
facilities. She stated the Planning Commission, on a vote of
3-2, recommended approval and acceptance of the proffered
conditions, indicating that the proposed development complies
with Upper Swift Creek Plan and addresses the impact on
capital facilities. She further stated the Board must
suspend its rules to accept amended Proffered Condition 3.
There was brief discussion relative to focal point acreage.
Hs. Orr stated, the focal point acreage is greater than 0.75
acres overall, but staff would prefer to see the suggested
focal point acreage provided at each of the entrances to the
development.
Mr. Andy Scherzer, representing the applicant, stated the
proposed development is a unique neo-traditional type
village. He further stated the applicant collaborated with
Design Works to provide a product that would appeal to a
variety of people with safer streets; limited access to
Woolridge and Otterdale Roads and a grid of connecting
streets within the development; alleys; and modified setbacks
with buildings closer to the street so that people can get to
know their neighbors better. He stated two or three existing
ponds will be incorporated into the development, and a linear
park will be located along the entire north side of the
property. He further stated the development will include
architectural variety, and at least 100 homes will have front
loaded garages that will be set back 20 feet from the main
structure. He stated the existing barn and riding stable
will be enhanced and incorporated into the development. He
noted the retail and professional space is oriented inward
with required buffers along Woolridge Road. He stated the
developer has provided for open space at the entrance, and
the buffer strip acreage combined with the entrance space is
well in excess of the 0.75 acres staff requires for a focal
point. He stated the developer has agreed to pay the full
cash proffer and will be providing the transportation portion
of the cash proffer up front. He noted the developer will
also provide shoulders, widening and other road improvements
in addition to the cash proffers and will phase high traffic
commercial development after 2008 to allow for road
improvements. He stated the applicant has crafted a first-
class community while addressing neighborhood concerns and
requested the Board's approval of the development.
Hr. Barber called for public comment.
Hr. Ted Lushch, a Hoseley resident, stated the Board deferred
the Glen Abbey Partners case until August 24, 2005 for
additional time to finalize the Upper Swift Creek Plan. He
further stated the proposed development borders the Glen
Abbey property and requested that this case be deferred until
August 24tn and heard at the same time as the Glen Abbey
case.
05-428
05/25/O5
Mr. David Webb, President of the Fox Fire Homeowners
Association, requested that the Board defer the request for
90 days to coincide with the Glen Abbey case. He stated,
although the proposed development is well laid out, citizens
must oppose it because of the lack of adequate infrastructure
due to the cumulative impact of this development and
previously approved developments. He expressed concerns
relative to significant traffic increases on Woolridge Road
and that the gap between providing infrastructure and the
pace of new development keeps widening.
Mr. Greg Blake, a Foxcroft resident, expressed concerns
relative to overcrowding of schools and additional traffic in
the area of the proposed development. He stated development
is outpacing school infrastructural needs. He noted the
Upper Swift Creek Plan is currently being revised, and
requested that the Board either defer or deny the requests.
Ms. Kitty Snow expressed concerns relative to dangerous
conditions of Otterdale, Genito and Woolridge Roads. She
stated the proposed development will increase traffic by over
6,000 trips daily on Otterdale and Woolridge Roads. She
requested that the Board deny the case or at least defer it.
Ms. Mandy Wilson requested that roads and schools be provided
before any additional development is approved for the area.
Mr. Roger Dick, a long-time resident of Woolridge Road,
stated the collector road currently under construction will
relieve traffic on Woolridge Road. He further stated the
developer has shown a great sensitivity to the needs of the
community in trying to address residents' concerns. He
stated the equestrian trails will provide a natural buffer
and help protect the environment.. He noted it will take five
years to develop the property and requested that the Board
consider the property rights of individuals and approve the
proposed development.
Mr. Tom Thomas, owner of Wintergate Farm, stated he supports
the development because his horse facility will be upgraded
and will remain on the property. He further stated the
addition of horse trails will make this the nicest horse
facility in the region and urged the Board to approve the
request.
Ms. Marleen Durfee, representing the Task Force for
Responsible Growth, provided Board members with a letter
regarding the deferral policy instituted February 11, 12004
and requested a response from the county to the issues
raised. She noted that Mr. Bass, Matoaca District Planning
Commissioner, recommended denial of the proposed development.
She stated, although she appreciates safe streets inside the
development, she is looking for safe streets outside of the
development. She expressed concerns relative to increased
traffic accidents and injuries on Woolridge, Otterdale and
Hull Street Roads. She stated she is bothered by the
cumulative effect of developments in this area, and expressed
concerns that Woolridge Road will not be widened until at
least 2017. She further stated the proposed development will
provide a green light for Magnolia Green with the extension
of water and sewer. She stated proffers and densities should
not be the only two things looked at in determining whether a
development is appropriate. She requested that the Board
05-~29
05/2,5/05
defer the request consistent with the deferral policy
instituted February 11, 2004 and send a message to the
citizens that the Board is willing to talk about growth
management in an area that needs it the most.
There being no one else to speak to the request, the public
hearing was closed.
Mr. Scherzer stated the parallel road currently under
construction and the transportation cash proffer being
offered up front by this developer will assist in addressing
transportation issues in the area. He further stated the
proposed development will not stimulate development in
Magnolia Green, indicating that a water line design already
exists on the Woolridge Road side of Magnolia Green, as well
as easements and a sewer line design on the other side of the
creek. He stated he sees the proposed development as
incremental growth and does not see the logic in a revised
Upper Swift Creek Plan making any difference when it comes to
infill development. He further stated this request was filed
prior to the Board's deferral policy and requested that the
Board approve the case and establish a standard for future
development to adhere to.
Mr. Barber stated the applicant has provided a number of
positives, including a new urbanism design; a number of
amenities, including preservation and incorporation of a
horse farm into the development; and a full cash proffer,
including a transportation proffer up front, which will
assist with road construction in the area. He further stated
he believes the proposed development represents all the
facets of smart growth. He stated, although a land use plan
may be under revision, it is not uncommon or unwise to refer
to the current land use plan when reviewing zoning requests.
He further stated he is pleased with the fact that even those
who oppose the case are appreciative of its merits.
Mr. Miller stated this is an excellent planned case, but he
would rather be in a position to support it after having the
benefit of the Upper Swift Creek Plan revision. He noted
there are incremental issues developing all over the county
and stated it is not good planning to selectively approve or
deny zoning requests.
Mr. King stated, although he agrees with Mr. Miller that
there is going to be a time when the Board will need to look
at the critical mass and the problems with infrastructure, he
has always supported property rights. He further stated he
will support a deferral if Mrs. Humphrey chooses to do so.
Mrs. Humphrey stated the review of this zoning request began
well over 18 months ago, indicating that she appreciates the
applicant taking his time and working with the needs of the
community. She further stated this is the most exceptional
zoning case she has seen in the past ten years. She
expressed appreciation to the applicant for offering the
transportation cash proffer up front and keeping the rural
character by maintaining the horse barn, open pasture and
fields. She stated she has had discussions with the
applicant regarding the possibility of a middle school site
on this property and needs additional time to continue the
discussion.
05-430
O5/25/05
Mrs. Humphrey then made a motion for the Board to defer Case
04SN0207 until July 27, 2005.
In response to Mr. Micas's question, Mrs. Humphrey stated she
wants the public hearing for Case 04SN0207 to remain closed.
Discussion ensued relative to acceptance of amended Proffered
Condition 3, which was submitted after the Planning
Commission's hearing of the case.
On motion of Mrs. Humphrey, seconded by Mr. King, the Board
suspended its rules at this time to allow for acceptance of
amended Proffered Condition 3.
Ayes: Barber, King, Humphrey and Miller.
Nays: None.
Absent: Warren.
Mr. King seconded the earlier motion of Mrs. Humphrey for the
Board to defer consideration of Case 0,~SN0207 until July 27,
2005.
In response to Mr. Barber's question, Mr. Micas stated
modifications could still be made to tlne case during the 60-
day deferral period.
Mr. Barber then called for a vote on the motion of ]Hrs.
Humphrey, seconded by Mr. King, for the Board to defer
consideration of Case 04SN0207 until July 27, 2005.
Ayes: Barber, King, Humphrey and Miller.
Nays: None.
Absent: Warren.
Mr. Barber requested a five-minute recess.
Reconvening:
16. PUBLIC HEARINGS
16.A. TO CONSIDER AN ORDINANCE DIVIDING DEER RUN VOTING
PRECINCT IN THE MATOACA DISTRICT INTO TWO PRECINCTS
AND CHANGING THE POLLING PLACE FOR WINTERPOCK VOTING
PRECINCT IN THE MATOACA DISTRICT
Mr. Haake stated this date and time has been advertised for a
public hearing for the Board to consider and ordinance
dividing Deer Run Voting Precinct in Matoaca District into
two precincts and changing the polling place for Winterpock
Voting Precinct from the Winterpock Fire Station to Bethia
United Methodist Church.
Mr. Barber called for public comment.
No one came forward to speak to the ordinance.
On motion of Mrs. Humphrey, seconded by Mr. King, the Board
adopted the following ordinance:
05-431
05/25/05
AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE CODE OF THE COUNTY
OF CHESTERFIELD, 1997, AS AMENDED, BY AMENDING
AND RE-ENACTING SECTION 7-3 RELATING
TO PRECINCT BOUNDARIES AND POLLING PLACES
BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield
County:
(1) That Section 7-3 of the Code of the County of
Chesterfield, 1997, as amended, is amended and re-enacted to
read as follows:
Sec. 7-3. Precinct boundaries and polling places.
The following shall be the precinct boundaries and
polling places for magisterial districts in the county:
DEER RUN VOTING PRECINCT (302):
Beginning at the point where the center line of Baldwin Creek
Road (State Route 730} intersects the center line of U.S.
Route 360 (Hull Street Road); thence eastward along the
center line of U.S. Route 360 (Hull Street Road) to its
intersection with Swift Creek; thence southward along the
center line of Swift Creek to its intersection with Spring
Run Creek; thence along the center line of Spring Run Creek
as it meanders southward to its intersection with North
Spring Run Road (State Route 654); thence westward along the
center line of North Spring Run Road to its intersection with
McEnnally Road; thence westward along the center line of
McEnnally Road to its intersection with Winterpock Road;
thence southward along the center line of Winterpock Road to
its intersection with Beach Road; thence westward along the
center line of Beach Road (State Route 655) to its
intersection with Baldwin Creek Road (State Route 730);
thence northward along the center line of Baldwin Creek Road
(State Route 730) to its intersection with U.S. Route 360
(Hull Street Road), the point and place of beginning.
The voting place for Deer Run Voting Precinct shall be Clover
Hill Library, 6701 Deer Run Drive.
BIRKDALE VOTING PRECINCT (317)
Beginning at the point where the center line of North Spring
Run Road (State Route 654) intersects the center line of
McEnnally Road; thence southeastwardly along the center line
of North Spring Run Road (State Route 654) to its
intersection with Spring Run Road {State Route 662); thence
eastwardly along the center line of Spring Run Road (State
Route 662) to its intersection with Hensley Road (State Route
659); thence southwestwardly along the center line of Hensley
Road (State Route 659) to its intersection with Beach Road
(State Route 655); thence westward along the center line of
Beach Road (State Route 655) to its intersection with
Winterpock Road; thence north along the center line of
Winterpock Road to its intersection with McEnnally Road;
thence eastwardly along the center line of McEnnally Road to
its intersection with North Spring Run Road, the point and
place of beginning.
The voting place for Birkdale Voting Precinct shall be Spring
Run Elementary School, 13901 Spring Run Road.
05-432
O5/25/O5
WINTERPOCK VOTING PRECINCT (306):
Beginning at the point where the center line of U.S. Route
360 (Hull Street Road) intersects the boundary line between
the County of Chesterfield and the County of Amelia as said
boundary line follows the Appomattox River in a
southeastwardly direction to its intersection with the
western line of Nooning Creek as flooded by Lake Chesdin;
thence northwardly along the western line of Nooning Creek
continuing along the center line of said creek to its
intersection with the southwestern boundary line of census
block 1007034014; thence in a northwardly direction along
said boundary line to its intersection with Second Branch
Road (State Route 653); thence northwardly along the center
line of Second Branch Road (State Route 653) to its
intersection with Beach Road (State Route 655); thence
westward along the center line of Beach Road (State Route
655) to its intersection with Baldwin Creek Road (State Route
730); thence northwardly along the center line of Baldwin
Creek Road (State Route 730) to its intersection with U.S.
Route 360 (Hull Street Road); thence westward along the
center line of U.S. Route 360 (Hull Street Road) to its
intersection with the boundary line between the County of
Chesterfield and the County of Amelia, the point and place of
beginning.
The voting place for Winterpock Voting Precinct shall be
Bethia United Methodist Church, 10700 Winterpock Road.
(2) That this ordinance shall become effective immediately
upon adoption.
Ayes: Barber, King, Humphrey and Miller.
Nays: None.
Absent: Warren.
16.B. TO CONSIDER AN ORDINANCE TO ESTABLISH THE ~BECKHAM
DRIVE SEWER ASSESSMENT DISTRICT" FOR FOUR LOTS IN ¶~HE
EN~LEWOOD SUBDIVISION
Mr. Stith stated this date and time has been advertised for a
public hearing for the Board to consider an ordinance to
establish the ~Beckham Drive Sewer Assessment District" for
four lots in the Englewood Subdivision.
Mr. Barber called for public comment.
Ms. Katherine Harwell, a resident of Beckham Drive, stated
she replaced her septic system in 2000 and has had no issues
since the new system was installed. She further stated the
Englewood Sewer Assessment District approved in 2003 excluded
her property and the other three properties proposed for the
Beckham Drive Sewer Assessment District because it was deemed
that it was not feasible to extend the line this far. She
stated the situation has not changed and noted that the new
distric~ will require the relocation of a water line and
there will be less than the normal amount of minimal ground
cover over a sewer line. She stated she is the only one of
the four residents who does not support the district and
expressed concerns that the stipulation for 70 percent
support is unfair with such a small number of properties
05-433
05/2~5/05
involved. She referenced a section of the county code which
requires Health Department certification that a significant
portion of the homes in the area to be served have
experienced well or septic system failure prior to Board of
Supervisors' approval of an extension to serve a developed
area. She further stated it is far more cost effective to
replace a septic system than to incur the expense of an
assessment district, indicating that she strongly opposes
creation of the district.
Mr. Robert Andes stated his family has owned property on
Beckham Drive for 47 years and has had septic system problems
the entire time. He noted that three out of four residents
support the assessment district.
In response to Mr. Barber's question, Mr. Bryant stated the
portion of the county ordinance referred to by Ms. Harwell
does not apply to assessment districts where the owners pay
for installation of the facility, but goes back to when the
Utilities Department funded extensions when the Health
Department deemed there was a need.
Mr. Micas confirmed that the ordinance referred to by Ms.
Harwell referred to situations in which the Board, at county
expense, extended lines. He further stated, under separate
state law, the Board can impose an assessment district for
any reason or no reason.
Mr. Barber inquired whether any of the four properties are in
eminent danger of septic system failure.
Mr. Bryant stated it is his understanding that at least one
of the properties could be in danger. He further stated
these four properties were not included in the Englewood
Sewer Assessment District because it did not appear they
could be served by the extension upon review of preliminary
engineering plans because the line would be too shallow. He
stated, by using a different type of pipe for the extension,
the cover will be reduced to an acceptable level. He further
stated the cost incurred by these four residents will be
approximately $500 less than the cost incurred by the
Englewood Assessment residents.
In response to Mr. Miller's question, Mr. Bryant stated there
is not a minimum number of homes required to establish an
assessment district.
Discussion ensued relative to other options and the expense
involved for the residents to replace their septic systems.
In response to Mr. Barber's question, Mr. Bryant stated there
would be no way to provide a sewer assessment district for
the other three properties without including Ms. Harwell's
property.
Both Mr. King and Mr. Miller inquired about the possibility
of the other residents replacing their septic systems like
Ms. Harwell did.
Mr. Barber stated the neighbors have weighed their other
options. He further stated two septic fields were not
required at the time this subdivision was developed. He
stated, as younger families are moving into older
05-43~
05/25/05
neighborhoods, septic systems are being taxed beyond what
they can handle. He noted that, although the cost for an
assessment district is more expensive than a replacement
system, the interest rate is very low and spread over 20
years. He stated, although Ms. Harwell has a relatively new
septic system, her property value will be impacted by the
failing septic systems of her neighbors. He stated he sees
no hardship in deferring the public hearing for 30 days and
determining whether the other property owners have the option
of replacing their septic systems.
No one else came forward to speak to the issue.
Mr. Miller expressed concerns relative to the assessment
district being punitive to Ms. Harwell.
Mr. Barber made a motion, seconded by Mr. King, for the Board
to defer the public hearing to consider an ordinance, to
establish the Beckham Drive Sewer Assessment District until
June 22, 2005.
Ayes: Barber, King, Humphrey and Miller.
Nays: None.
Absent: Warren.
16.C. TO CONSIDER APPROPRIATION OF ADDITIONAL FUNDS AND
APPROVAL OF CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT FOR RAYON PARK
WASTEWATER iMPROVEMENTS PROJECT
Mr. Stith stated this date and time has been advertised for a
public hearing for the Board to consider appropriation of
additional funds and approval of a construction contract for
the Rayon Park Wastewater Improvements Project.
Mr. Barber called for public comment.
No one came forward to speak to the issue.
On motion of Mr. King, seconded by Mr. Miller, the Board
appropriated $800,000 in additional funds from the Utilities
sewer balance to 5P-58350-000225E; authorized staff to
recommend annual Community Development Block Grant
reimbursement of funds in incremental amounts of $132,000;
awarded a construction contract for the Rayon Park Wastewater
Improvements to R. J. Smith Construction, Incorporated in the
amount of $1,730,391; and authorized the County Administrator
to execute all necessary documents.
Ayes: Barber, King, Humphrey and Miller.
Nays: None.
Absent: Warren.
16.D. TO CONSIDER THE RESTRICTION OF THROUGH TRUCK TRAFFIC
ON FOX CLUB PARKWAY AND FOX CLUB ROAD
Mr. Stith stated this date and time has been advertised for a
public hearing for the Board to consider the restriction of
through truck traffic on Fox Club Parkway and Fox Club Road.
Mr. Barber called for public comment.
05-~35
05/25/05
Mr. Greg Blake, President of the Foxcroft Homeowners
Association Board of Directors, also representing Fox Fire
Homeowners Association, stated he supports the restriction of
through truck traffic on Fox Club Parkway and Fox Club Road,
as well as a four-way stop at the intersections of Fox Club
Parkway and what was formerly known as Village Square
Parkway, which he understands the county's Transportation
Department has requested and the Virginia Department of
Transportation has agreed to install. He referenced an
independent traffic safety analysis, funded by the residents
of Foxcroft and Fox Fire, that has been provided to the
county and requested that the recommended proposals be
studied in detail and a response provided to the residents
who financed the study.
Ms. Mandy Wilson stated she believes this is a move in the
right direction and requested the Board's support of
restricting through truck traffic on Fox Club Parkway and Fox
Club Road.
There being no one else to speak to the issue, the public
hearing was closed.
In response to Mr. Barber's question, Mr. McCracken stated
the extension of the planned east/west road from the school
to Otterdale Road will depend upon future development. He
further stated there have been some discussions with
potential developers regarding the extension.
On motion of Mrs. Humphrey, seconded by Mr. King, the Board
adopted the following resolution:
WHEREAS, the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors
received a request to restrict any through truck or truck and
trailer or semi-trailer combination except pickup or panel
trucks from using Fox Club Parkway and Fox Club Road between
Route 360 and Woolridge Road; and
WHEREAS, the recommended alternate route is Route 360,
Otterdale Road, and Woolridge Road; and
WHEREAS, the Board has conducted a public hearing on the
restriction.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of
Supervisors requests the Virginia Department of
Transportation to restrict through truck traffic on Fox Club
Parkway and Fox Club Road between Route 360 and Woolridge
Road.
Ayes: Barber, King, Humphrey and Miller.
Nays: None.
Absent: Warren.
16.E. TO CONSIDER LEASE OF SPACE IN FIRE STATION 15 LOCATED AT
7300 AIRFIELD DRIVE TO PETROLEUM HELICOPTERS, INCOP~PORATED
FOR EMERGENCY MEDICAL TRANSPORT SERVICE
Mr. Pitaro stated this date and time has been advertised for
a public hearing for the Board to consider lease of space in
Fire Station 15 to Petroleum Helicopters, Incorporated for
emergency medical transport service.
05-436
O5/25/O5
Mr. Barber called for public comment.
No one came forward to speak to the issue.
On motion of Mr. Miller, seconded by Mrs. Humphrey, the Board
approved the lease of space in Fire Station 15 located at
7300 Airfield Drive to Petroleum Helicopters, Incorporated
for emergency medical facility-to-facility transport service.
(It is noted a copy of the lease .is filed with the papers of
this Board.)
Ayes: Barber, King, Humphrey and Miller.
Nays: None.
Absent: Warren.
16.F. TO CONSIDER THE APPROPRIATION OF FEDERAL AND STATE
FUNDS FOR VARIOUS SOCIAL SERVICE PROGRAMS
Mr. Hammer stated this date and time has been advertised for
a public hearing for the Board to consider the appropriation
of $1,172,075 in federal and state funds for various social
service programs.
Mr. Barber called for public comment.
No one came forward to speak to the issue.
In response to Mr. Barber's question, Mr. Hammer stated this
funding was not anticipated and actually meets the demand
needs of the Social Services Department based upon their
current expenditures. He further stated the state did not
project the level of day care, foster care and adoption
expenses that the county incurred this year.
On motion of Mr. Barber, seconded by Mr. Miller, the Board
appropriated $1,172,075 in federal and state funds for
various social service programs.
Ayes:
Nays:
Absent:
Barber, King, Humphrey and Miller.
None.
Warren.
16.G. TO CONSIDER THE DONATION OF 21.9 ACRES, MORE OR LESS,
AT THE COURTHOUSE COMPLEX TO THE HEALTH CENTER
COMMISSION FOR THE COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD
Mr. Hammer stated this date and time has been advertised for
a public hearing for the Board to consider the conveyance of
21.9 acres, more or less, of county property at the
Courthouse Complex to the Health Center Commission. He
further stated the Health Center Commission is concerned that
the consideration price of the acreage was not originally
contemplated and would like additional time to work 'with
Board members and defer the issue until June 22, 2005 after
the public hearing has been closed.
Mr. Barber called for public conm~ent.
Ms. Carol Crosby, Chair of the Health Center Commission,
thanked the Board for its recent zoning approval of the Lucy
05-437
05/25/05
Corr project and requested the Board's support of the
donation of the adjacent 22 acres of land for expansion of
the facility's long-term care community. She stated in 1993,
the Board of Supervisors created the Health Center Commission
for the purpose of operating the nursing home while plans
were underway for construction of the new health care center
and assisted living apartments. She further stated, at that
time, the newly created Health Center Commission asked for
the entire parcel of land now bounded by Courthouse Road,
Courts Complex Road, Government Center Parkway and Lucy Corr
Boulevard. She stated, although the Board did not choose to
convey the entire parcel at that time, the land on which the
original and new building are located was donated to the
Commission and it was understood that the remaining land was
set aside for the Commission's future use. She further
stated in November 2002, the Health Center Commission, with
participation from county officials, developed a five-year
strategic plan for Lucy Corr Village to strengthen its
financial viability so that it would no longer have to rely
on county subsidies. She stated the plan included expansion
of services to offer a full continuing care for county senior
citizens in a campus environment, noting that the expansion
would address many of the needs identified in the Committee
on the Future's report on aging. She further stated the
Health Center Commission supported the amendment to the
Central Area Plan in 2004 provided it would not interfere
with the Commission's plan for expanding Lucy Corr Village.
She stated that, until last month, neither the Board nor
County Administration has communicated any intent to charge
the commission, a public entity of the county, for the land.
She stated the commission has agreed to a number of proffers
for the proposed development, including a significant cash
proffer approximated at $700,000, which was also
unanticipated and has had some impact on the projected
pricing of Lucy Corr Village's services. She expressed
concerns relative to the significant impact of the suggested
$50,000 per acre cost to the project, which was intended to
be affordable for a middle-income population. She stated a
reduced market for the proposed services and lower debt
service coverage ratios would impact the Commission's ability
to sell bonds to support the project. She further stated the
project will add to the county's base of new construction,
provide additional jobs and increase the tax base. She
requested that the Board carefully consider a positive vote
for the donation of land for the Lucy Corr Village expansion
project, which would be a vote for support of the Commission
created by the Board to operate the facility. She stated if
the Board cannot support the donation of the property, then
the Commission is requesting a deferral of the issue.
Mr. Sonny Currin referenced the Meadowville and Cloverleaf
Mall projects that the county is involved in, which could
also be viewed as unfair competition with free enterprise.
He stated his mother has been well cared for at Lucy Corr
Village for 14 years, and requested that the Board donate the
property to the Health Center Commission.
There being no one else to speak to the issue, the public
hearing was closed.
In response to Mr. Miller's questions, Mr. Ramsey stated the
appraised value of the property is between $102,000 and
$137,000 per acre. He further stated, the Health Center
05-438
05/25/05
Commission provided a plan to bring other private medical
facilities to Lucy Corr Village that would generate business
and increase the county's tax base, and the Public Facilities
Plan set aside the subject property for this type of use. He
stated he does not believe it was designated whether the land
was to be donated because it was anticipated at that time
that private facilities would be constructed on the property.
Mr. Miller inquired whether any moral or legal commitments
were made for the county to donate the property to the Health
Center Commission.
Mr. Ramsey stated he was not aware of any such commitments.
In response to Mr. Miller's questions, Mr. Ramsey stated he
does not know how the county acquired the property.
In response to Mr. Miller's question, Mr. Micas stated bond
attorneys and underwriters have indicated that any
requirement for the nursing home to pay the county back for
the value of the land upon conveyance or resale, or upon
default, would jeopardize the financials for their bond
issue, and they were unwilling to agree to that.
Mr. Miller expressed concerns relative to the Board not being
good stewards of the public trust ill the county were to
donate 21.9 acres of taxpayers' assets to the Health Center
Commission. He stated he believes a discounted price of
$50,000 per acre is a substantially generous offer by the
county. He further stated he does not believe donation of
the property to the Health Center Commission is in the best
interest of the county.
Mr. King stated he appreciates the Board allowing the Health
Center Commission to come forward with a proposal for future
development. He further stated, because the property is
located in the Dale District, he will support Mr. Miller's
decision regarding conveyance of the property.
Mrs. Humphrey stated because of the partnership that exists
between the Board and the Health Center Commission, she
believes the Board should grant the deferral requested by Ms.
Crosby.
In response to Mrs. Humphrey's question, Mr. Ramsey stated
staff's attempt to acquire a provision for the Health Center
Commission to pay the county for the land if there was a sale
or default was unsuccessful.
Mr. Micas stated underwriters have indicated that they felt a
repayment requirement would make the bond issue too risky or
uneconomic, but staff will investigate whether other
provisions can be arranged, if the Board desires.
Mr. Barber inquired whether the county could donate a portion
of the property initially with the understanding that, after
the first phase of the development and increased cash flow
for the Health Center Commission, the remainder of the
property would be purchased.
Ms. Leigh Robbins, Acting Executive Director of Lucy Corr
Village, stated the plans call for two phases of the project,
both of which are proposed for the same acreage. She
05-439
05/25/05
suggested a further reduction in the cost of the property,
indicating this could still meet the bonding requirements and
perhaps be acceptable to the Health Center Commission.
In response to Mr. Miller's question, Ms. Robbins stated
additional time is necessary to determine a purchase price
necessary to make the project feasible.
Mr. Miller stated he believes the discounted cost of $50,000
per acre is very generous, since the county would still be
donating approximately $1.5 million in property value to the
Health Center Commission.
Mr. King stated he would support a deferral.
Mr. Miller stated he has no problems with a deferral.
Mr. Miller made a motion, seconded by Mr. King, for the Board
to defer consideration of the conveyance of 21.9 acres, more
or less, at the Courthouse Complex to the Health Center
Commission for the County of Chesterfield.
Discussion ensued relative to the length of deferral time and
whether to keep the public hearing closed.
It was generally agreed that the public hearing would remain
closed and the issue be deferred until June 22, 2005.
Mr. Barber called for a vote on the motion of Mr. Miller,
seconded by Mr. King, for the Board to defer consideration of
the conveyance of 21.9 acres, more or less, at the Courthouse
Complex to the Health Center Commission for the County of
Chesterfield until June 22, 2005.
Ayes: Barber, King, Humphrey and Miller.
Nays: None.
Absent: Warren.
On motion of Mr. Miller, seconded by Mrs. Humphrey, the Board
suspended its rules at this time to consider agenda items
after 11:00 p.m.
Ayes: Barber, King, Humphrey and Miller.
Nays: None.
Absent: Warren.
16.H. TO CONSIDER AN ORDINANCE TO VACATE A SIXTEEN-FOOT
DRAINAGE EASEMENT ACROSS LOT 23, GREENBRIAR
SUBDIVISION, SECTION i
Mr. Stith stated this date and time has been advertised for a
public hearing for the Board to consider an ordinance to
vacate a 16-foot drainage easement across Lot 23, Greenbriar,
Section 1.
Mr. Barber called for public comment.
No one came forward to speak to the ordinance.
On motion of Mr. King, seconded by Mr. Miller, the Board
adopted the following ordinance:
05-440
05/25/05
AN ORDINANCE whereby the COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD,
VIRGINIA, ("GRANTOR") vacates to PROSPECT HOMES OF
RICHMOND, INC., a Virginia Corporation,
("GRANTEE"), a 16' drainage easement across Lot 23,
Greenbriar Subdivision, Section 1, BERMUDA
Magisterial District, Chesterfield County,
Virginia, as shown on a plat thereof duly recorded
in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of
Chesterfield County in Plat Book 1.44, at ?ages 71-
73.
WHEREAS, PROSPECT HOMES OF RICHMOND, INC, petitioned the
Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County, Virginia. to
vacate a 16' drainage easement across Lot 23, Greenbriar
Subdivision, Section 1, BERMUDA Magisterial District,
Chesterfield County, Virginia more particularly shown on a
plat of record in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of
said County in Plat Book 144, Pages 71-73, by TIMMONS GROUP,
dated MAY 21, 2004. The easement petitioned to be vacated is
more fully described as follows:
A 16' drainage easement, across Lot 23, Greenbriar
Subdivision, Section 1, the location of which is
more fully shown on a plat made by TIMMONS GROUP,
dated FEBRUARY 22, 2005, a copy of which is
attached hereto and made a part of this Ordinance.
WHEREAS, notice has been given pursuant to Section 15.2-
2204 of the Code of Virginia, !950~ as amended, by
advertising; and,
WHEREAS, no public necessity exists for the continuance
of the easement sought to be vacated.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE
SUPERVISORS OF CHESTERFIELD COUNTY, VIRGINIA:
BOARD OF
That pursuant to Section 15.2-2272 of the Code of
Virginia, 1950, as amended, the aforesaid easement be and is
hereby vacated.
This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect in
accordance with Section 15.2-2272 of the Code of Virginia,
1950, as amended, and a certified copy of this Ordinance,
together with the plat attached hereto shall be recorded no
sooner than thirty days hereafter in the Clerk's Office of
the Circuit Court of Chesterfield County, Virginia pursuant
to Section 15.2-2276 of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as
amended.
The effect of this Ordinance pursuant to Section 15.2-
2274 is to destroy the force and effect of the recording of
the portion of the plat vacated. This Ordinance shall 'vest
fee simple title of the easement hereby vacated in the
property owner of Lot 23, within Greenbriar Subdivision,
Section 1 free and clear of any rights ~of public use.
Accordingly, this Ordinance shall be indexed in the
names of the COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD as GRANTOR, and PROSPECT
HOMES OF RICHMOND, INC., a Virginia corporation, or its
successors in title, as GRANTEE.
Ayes: Barber, King, Humphrey and Miller.
Nays: None.
Absent: Warren.
05-441
05/25/05
16.I. TO CONSIDER AN ORDINANCE TO VACATE PORTIONS OF
COALFIELD ROAD AND CENTER POINTE PARKWAY WITHIN
~CENTERPOINTE PARKWAY PHASE ONE AND ADDITIONAL RIGHT
OF WAY ON COALFIELD ROAD"
Mr. Stith stated this date and time has been advertised for a
public hearing to consider an ordinance to vacate portions of
Coalfield Road and Center Pointe Parkway within "Centerpointe
Parkway Phase One and additional right of way on Coalfield
Road."
Mr. Barber called for public comment.
No one came forward to speak to the ordinance.
On motion of Mrs. Humphrey, seconded Mr. King, the Board
adopted the following ordinance to vacate portions of
Coalfield Road and Center Pointe Parkway within ~Centerpointe
Parkway Phase One and additional right of way on Coalfield
Road," as shown on the plat filed with the papers of this
Board:
AN ORDINANCE whereby the COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD,
VIRGINIA, ("GRANTOR") vacates to GC REAL ESTATE
CORPORATION, a Virginia corporation, and RIVERSTONE
PROPERTIES, LLC, a Virginia limited liability
company, ("GRANTEE"), portions of a County right of
way known as Coalfield Road within ~CENTERPOINTE
PARKWAY PHASE ONE AND ADDITIONAL RIGHT OF WAY ON
COALFIELD ROAD", MATOACA Magisterial District,
Chesterfield County, Virginia, as shown on a plat
thereof duly recorded in the Clerk's Office of the
Circuit Court of Chesterfield County in Plat Book
73, at Page 29.
WHEREAS, CCA INDUSTRIES, INC., petitioned the Board of
Supervisors of Chesterfield County, Virginia to vacate
portions of a County right of way known as Coalfield Road
within ~CENTERPOINTE PARKWAY PHASE ONE AND ADDITIONAL RIGHT
OF WAY ON COALFIELD ROAD", MATOACA Magisterial District,
Chesterfield County, Virginia more particularly shown on a
plat of record in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of
said County in Plat Book 73, Page 29, by J. K. TIMMONS &
ASSOCIATES, P.C., dated MAY 14, 1990. The portions of right
of way petitioned to be vacated are more fully described as
follows:
Portions of a County right of way known as
Coalfield Road within "CENTERPOINTE PARKWAY PHASE
ONE AND ADDITIONAL RIGHT OF WAY ON COALFIELD ROAD",
the locations of which are more fully shown as
Parcel KD", containing 0.075 acres, and Parcel "E",
containing 0.312 acres, on a plat made by POTTS,
MINTER AND ASSOCIATES, P.C., dated APRIL 30, 2003,
and revised APRIL 14, 2004, MAY 18, 2004 and MAY
11, 2005, a copy of which is attached hereto and
made a part of this Ordinance.
WHEREAS, notice has been given pursuant to Section 15.2-
2204 of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended, by
advertising; and,
05-442
05/25/05
WHEREAS, no public necessity exists for the continuance
of the portions of right of way sought to be vacated.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE
SUPERVISORS OF CHESTERFIELD COUNTY, VIRGINIA:
BOARD OF
That pursuant to Section 15.2-2272 of the Code of
Virginia, 1950, as amended, the aforesaid portions of right
of way be and are hereby vacated.
This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect in
accordance with Section 15.2-2272 of the Code of Virginia,
1950, as amended~ and a certified copy of this Ordinance,
together with the plat attached hereto shall be recorded no
sooner than thirty days hereafter in the Clerk's Office of
the Circuit Court of Chesterfield County, Virginia pursuant
to Section 15.2-2276 of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as
amended.
The effect of this Ordinance pursuant to Section 15.2-
2274 is to destroy the force and effect of the recording of
the portion of the plat vacated. This Ordinance shall vest
fee simple title to Parcel "D" in RIVERSTONE PROPERTIES, LLC,
a Virginia limited liability company, and Parcel "E" in GC
REAL ESTATE CORPORATION, a Virginia corporation free and
clear of any rights of public use.
Accordingly, this Ordinance shall be indexed in the
names of the COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD as GRANTOR, and GC REAL
ESTATE CORPORATION, a Virginia corporation, and RIVERSTONE
PROPERTIES, LLC, a Virginia limited ].iability company, or
their successors in title, as GRANTEE.
Ayes: Barber, King, Humphrey and Miller.
Nays: None.
Absent: Warren.
16.J. TO CONSIDER AN ORDINANCE TO VACATE A FIFTY-FOOT
UNIMPROVED RIOHT OF WAY KNOWN AS BARK TRAIL WITHIN
ARROWHEAD, SECTION 2
Mr. Stith stated this date and time has been advertised for a
public hearing for the Board to consider an ordinance to
vacate a 50-foot unimproved right of way known as Bark Trail
within Arrowhead, Section 2.
Mr. Barber called for public comment~
No one came forward to speak to the ordinance.
On motion of Mr. Barber, seconded by Mr. Miller, the Board
adopted the following ordinance:
AN ORDINANCE whereby the COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD,
VIRGINIA, ("GRANTOR") vacates to JOHN S. ROYER and
JOYCE L. ROYER, ("GRANTEE"), a 50' unimproved right
of way known as Bark Trail within Arrowhead,
Section 2, CLOVER HILL Magisterial District,
Chesterfield County, Virginia, as shown on a plat
thereof duly recorded in the Clerk's Office of the
05-~43
05/25/05
Circuit Court of Chesterfield County in Plat Book
14, at Page 34.
WHEREAS, JOHN S. ROYER and JOYCE L. ROYER, petitioned
the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County, Virginia to
vacate a 50' unimproved right of way known as Bark Trail
within Arrowhead, Section 2, CLOVER HILL Magisterial
District, Chesterfield County, Virginia more particularly
shown on a plat of record in the Clerk's Office of the
Circuit Court of said County in Plat Book 14, Page 34, by J.
K. TIM~4ONS, dated NOVEMBER 12, 1964 and recorded DECEMBER 2,
1964. The right of way petitioned to be vacated is more
fully described as follows:
A 50' unimproved right of way known as Bark Trail
within Arrowhead, Section 2, the location of which
is more fully shown on Exhibit "A" attached hereto
and made a part of this Ordinance.
WHEREAS, notice has been given pursuant to Section 15.2-
2204 of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended, by
advertising; and,
WHEREAS, no public necessity exists for the continuance
of the right of way sought to be vacated.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE
SUPERVISORS OF CHESTERFIELD COUNTY, VIRGINIA:
BOARD OF
That pursuant to Section 15.2-2272 of the Code of
Virginia, 1950, as amended, the aforesaid right of way be and
is hereby vacated.
GRANTEE hereby conveys unto GRANTOR and GRANTOR hereby
reserves an 8' and variable width easement as shown on the
attached plat.
This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect in
accordance with Section 15.2-2272 of the Code of Virginia,
1950, as amended, and a certified copy of this Ordinance,
together with the plat attached hereto shall be recorded no
sooner than thirty days hereafter in the Clerk's Office of
the Circuit Court of Chesterfield County, Virginia pursuant
to Section 15.2-2276 of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as
amended.
The effect of this Ordinance pursuant to Section 15.2-
2274 is to destroy the force and effect of the recording of
the portion of the plat vacated. Since the portion of right
of way within Arrowhead, Section 2 is located on the
periphery of the plat, this Ordinance shall vest fee simple
title to the right of way hereby vacated in the property
owner of Lot 1, Block H, within Arrowhead, Section 2 free and
clear of any rights of public use.
Accordingly, this Ordinance shall be indexed in the
names of the COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD as GRANTOR, and JOHN S.
ROYER and JOYCE L. ROYER, or their successors in title, as
GRANTEE.
Ayes: Barber, King, Humphrey and Miller.
Nays: None.
Absent: Warren.
05-444
05/25/05
16.K. TO CONSIDER THE VACATION OF A PORTION OF BATTERY
DANTZLER ROAD AND BATTERY DANTZLER COURT
Mr. Stith stated this date and time has been advertised for a
public hearing for the Board to consider the vacation of a
portion of Battery Dantzler Road and Battery Dantzler Court.
Mr. Barber called for public comment.
No one came forward to speak to the issue.
On motion of Mr. King, seconded by Mr. Miller, the Board
authorized the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors and the
County Administrator to execute a quitclaim deed to vacate a
portion of Battery Dantzler Road and Battery Dantzler Court.
(It is noted a copy of the plat is filed with the papers of
this Board.)
Ayes: Barber, King, Humphrey and Miller.
Nays: None.
Absent: Warren.
16.L. TO CONSIDER THE VACATION OF PORTIONS OF COALFIELD ROAD
Mr. Stith stated this date and time has been advertised for
the Board to consider the vacation of portions of Coalfield
Road.
Mr. Barber called for public comment.
No one came forward to speak to the issue.
On motion of Mrs. Humphrey, seconded by' Mr. Miller, the Board
authorized the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors and the
County Administrator to execute quitclaim deeds to vacate
portions of Coalfield Road to Riverstone Properties, LLC, GC
Real Estate Corporation and Commonwealth Foundation for
Cancer Research. (It is noted copies of the plats are filed
with the papers of this Board.)
Ayes: Barber, King, Humphrey and Miller.
Nays: None.
Absent: Warren.
17. REMAINING MANUFACTURED HOME PERMITS AND ZONING REQUESTS
There were no remaining manufactured home permits or zoning
requests.
18. ADJOURNMENT
On motion of Mr. Barber, seconded by Mr. King, the Board
adjourned at 11:13 p.m. until June 22, 2005 at 3:00 p.m.
Ayes: Barber, King, Humphrey and Miller.
Nays: None.
Absent: Warren.
ARajnS sYt razor
Edward B. Barber
Chairman
05-445
05/25/O5