The URL can be used to link to this page

07-27-2005 PacketCHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OFSUPERVlSORS AGENDA Page I of I Meetin~ Date: July 27, 2005 Subiect: County Administrator' s Comments County Administrator's Comments: Item Number: 2.A. County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Summary of Information: Mr. Ramsey will recognize Sheriff Williams for receiving 100% Compliance with Standards for Jails from the Board of Corrections. Preparer: Lisa Elko Attachments: -~ Yes Title: Clerk to the Board No l#000001 I CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page I of I Meetin~l Date: July 27, 2005 Subiect: County Administrator' s Comments County Administrator's Comments: Item Number: 2.B County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Summary of Information: Dr. Nelson will make a presentation to the Board this season for West Nile Virus. of Supervisors regarding Preparer: Lisa Elko Title: Attachments: -~ Yes No Clerk to the Board eO00002 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page I of 2 Meetin~l Date: July 27, 2005 Item Number: 2.C. Subiect: County Administrator's Comments County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Summary of Information: The Government Finance Officers' Association recently notified the Accounting Department that the County's Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR) for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2004 received a Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in Financial Reporting. The Certificate recognizes that the County's CAFR is a high-quality, easily readable and understandable document designed to meet the information needs of citizens, investors, and other financial report users. This is the 24~ consecutive year that the Accounting Department has achieved this highest form of recognition in governmental accounting and financial reporting. Preparer: Mary Lou Lyle Title: Director of Accounting Attachments: Yes No # 000003 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page I of I Meetin~l Date: Subject: July 27, 2005 Item Number: 5.A. Resolution Recognizing Chesterfield County's 2005 National Football League's Pro-Bowl Players County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Adoption of attached resolution. Summary of Information: Board Members are requesting the recognition of Mr. William Henderson, Mr. Rudi Johnson and Mr. James Farrior, as Chesterfield County's 2005 National Football League's Pro-Bowl players. Preparer: Lisa H, Elko Attachments: Yc$ Title: Clerk to the Board [-~No ~00004 RECOGNIZING CHESTERFIELD COUNTY'S 2005 NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE'S PRO-BOWL PLAYERS WHEREAS, it has long been recognized that ~A Sound Mind in a Sound Body" is desirable in our nation's students; and WHEREAS, with this in mind, Chesterfield County's public schools offer a wide variety of athletic opportunities to their students; and WHEREAS, the physical fitness and healthy lifestyle habits students acquire can stay with them throughout their lives; and WHEREAS, some students continue their athletic careers after graduating from Chesterfield County high schools; and WHEREAS, Fullback William Henderson of Green Bay and Running Back Rudi Johnson of the Cincinnati Bengals, both Thomas Dale High School graduates, and Pittsburgh Steelers Linebacker James Farrior, a Matoaca High School graduate, were all 2005 National Football League Pro-Bowl players; and WHEREAS, all three of these players also were members of the Chesterfield Quarterback League; and WHEREAS, their practice sessions and games held in Chesterfield County prepared them for the professional success they would later enjoy; and WHEREAS, these three young men are positive role models for other young athletes. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors, this 27th day of July 2005, publicly recognizes Mr. William Henderson, Mr. Rudi Johnson and Mr. James Farrior as fine examples of Chesterfield County Schools and the Chesterfield Quarterback League, and on behalf of all Chesterfield County residents, extends to these three gentlemen congratulations and best wishes for continued success. 600005 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page I of I Meetin~l Date: Subiect: July 27, 2005 Item Number: 5.B. Resolution Recognizing Lieutenant James R. Picardat, Chesterfield Fire and Emergency Medical Services Department, Upon His Retirement County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Adoption of attached resolution. Summary of Information: Staff is requesting the recognition of Lieutenant James R. Picardat, upon his retirement on May 1, 2005, after serving the county for over 28 years with dedicated service. Preparer: Chief Frank H. Edwards, Jr. Attachments: Yes ~-] No Title: 2® Deputy Fire Chief Ooo6 RECOGNIZING LIEUTENANT JAMES R. "RANDY" PICARDAT UPON HIS RETIREMENT WHEREAS, Lieutenant James R. ~Randy" Picardat retired from the Fire and Emergency Medical Services Department, Chesterfield County, on May 1, 2005; and WHEREAS, Lieutenant Picardat began his service on August 9, 1976, graduated from Recruit School #7, and has faithfully served the county for over 28 years in various assignments as a firefighter at the Chester Fire Station, the Ettrick Fire Station and the Bon Air Fire Station; as a sergeant at the Buford Fire Station; as a lieutenant at the Dutch Gap Fire Station, the Bensley Fire Station and the Ettrick Fire Station; and as an Assistant Fire Marshal in the Fire and Life Safety Division; and WHEREAS, Lieutenant Picardat was recognized by many of his peers for his faithful service, professionalism, positive attitude, cooperation with others, and development of firefighters for promotion; and WHEREAS, Lieutenant Picardat worked diligently to make Chesterfield County a safer community by providing safety inspections of county businesses while working in the Life Safety Division and educating citizens of all ages by teaching fire and life safety education programs throughout his entire career; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors, this 27th day of July 2005, publicly recognizes the contributions of Lieutenant James R. ~Randy" Picardat, expresses the appreciation of all residents for his service to the County, and extends their appreciation for his dedicated service and their congratulations upon his retirement. AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that a copy of this resolution be presented to Lieutenant Picardat and that this resolution be permanently recorded among the papers of this Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County, Virginia. 000007 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page I of I Meetin~l Date: July 27, 2005 Item Number: 5.C. Subiect: Recognizing Mr. Richard K. Nowell, Fleet Management Division Automotive Technician, Upon His Retirement, for 33 Years of Dedicated Service to the County County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Adoption of attached resolution. Summary of Information: Staff requests the Board adopt the attached resolution recognizing Mr. Richard K. Nowell for 33 years of service to Chesterfield County. Preparer: Francis M. Pitaro Title: Director, General Services Attachments: Yes ~-] No L~O008 RECOGNIZING MR. RICHARD K. NOWELL UPON HIS RETIREMENT WHEREAS, Mr. Richard K. Nowell retired July 1, 2005 after providing thirty-three years of dedicated and faithful service to Chesterfield County; and WHEREAS, Mr. Nowell began his service July 1, 1972 as a firefighter, in the Chesterfield County Fire and Emergency Medical Services Department and served for twenty years; and WHEREAS, Mr. Nowell served as automotive technician, in the Department of General Services, Fleet Management Division for thirteen years; and WHEREAS, Mr. Nowell has seen the county fleet grow to its present size of more than 2,400 vehicles; and WHEREAS, Mr. Nowell always performed his duties and responsibilities in an excellent manner and placed the welfare and safety of citizens and fellow county employees above his own personal comfort and feelings and will be missed by his fellow co-workers. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors, this 22nd day of June 2005, publicly recognizes Mr. Richard K. Nowell and extends appreciation for his thirty-three years of dedicated service to the county, congratulations upon his retirement, and best wishes for a long and happy retirement. 000009 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page I of I Meetin~l Date: July/27, 2005 Item Number: Subiect: Deferred Item - Zoning Case 04SN0207 - Dart II LLC County Administrator's Comments: State law changes on July 1st now require modifications to cash proffer language related to the length of time to spend funds. This change required that this case have a public hearing. The case should be limited to the cash proffer issue only. County Administrator: ~ Board Action Requested: Summary of Information: On May 25, 2005, the Board held and closed the public hearing on the above zoning case and deferred action to July 27, 2005. New state law effective July 1st renders the existing cash proffer for this case unenforceable. Because of the change in state law, Mrs. Humphrey has agreed to reopen the public hearing solely to allow consideration by the Board of an amended cash proffer offered by the applicant that complies with state law. Accordingly, the case has been advertised for a public hearing at 7:00 p.m. during your normal zoning docket. Preparer: Kirkland A. Turner Title: Director of Planning Department 0505(23) :69494.1 Attachments: No CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page I of 3 Date: Juh 2005 Item Number: 8.A. Subject: Annual Cash Proffer Information, Adoption of Maximum Per Dwelling Unit Cash Proffer for Fiscal Year 2006 and PolicyChanges~~~~~ County Administrator's Comments: ~~~J County Administrator: Board Action Requested: After a brief presentation, the Board is requested to set the maximum cash proffer amount per dwelling unit for FY2006, adopt the Marshall & Swift Cost Index increase for existing cash proffer cases, and approve changes to the cash proffer policy. Summary of Information: Staff annually calculates the per residential dwelling unit impact on select capital facilities and evaluates the Board's cash proffer policy for possible amendments. These findings are reviewed with the Board and the Board sets a maximum amount for the coming fiscal year. Since inception of the legislated authority to accept cash proffers, the Board has from time to time amended its policy and revised its maximum per dwelling unit cash proffer amount that can be accepted from zoning applicants. The current maximum cash proffer is $11,500 per dwelling unit, last set in 2004. This year staff has calculated an impact of $17,525 per dwelling unit. The cost increase is due to changes in the variables to calculate the road and school capital facility impacts. Preparer: RebeccaT. Dickson Title: Director, Budget and Management Attachments: Yes No 0000~.~. CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 2 of 3 Meeting Date: July 27, 2005 Summary of Information (continued) The school impact figure has been adjusted using the average number of students per household in the newest households rather than all households in the county. The road cost reflects a higher cost recovery rate for residentially generated trips. The Planning Commission and staff analyzed differential cash proffer concepts over the past year and have concluded that differential cash proffers would not materially impact the overall rate or pattern of development in the county. Accordingly, staff recommends that the Board adopt a single maximum amount. The Board could adopt a maximum acceptable amount up to the calculated costs of $17,525 per dwelling unit. Staff is recommending a maximum amount of $17,000 per dwelling unit. In addition, staff recommends that the Board adopt the Marshall & Swift Building Cost index increase of 9.3% for cash proffer cases already approved. While the change in the index is higher than in recent years, it is reflective of the trends in the construction market. Policy amendments address one item initiated in the Board's June 2004 retreat and a required legislative change. The legislated change mandates a new time frame for spending collected cash payments for cases approved on or after July 1, 2005, establishes provisions for alternative uses of collected payments, and specifies how collected funds would be used if not spent within the established time periods. Under the new legislation, a locality must cause a project to start within 7 years of receiving all of the proffered payments for a particular case. The Board's policy allows 15 years from the time of collection to spend the money. This legislated change will not have a negative impact on the county. At the June 2004 retreat, the Board initiated establishing a policy for dealing with cases under review that may cross annual calculation periods. Under the proposal, cases will be evaluated under the cash proffer amount in place at the time an application is filed and will be subject to one change in the calculated amount. This approach is recommended by the Planning Commission and staff. Staff recommends that cases decided by the Planning Commission prior to July 27, 2005 be exempt from this change to allow a transition period for cases currently in process. Previous practice entailed cases being evaluated under the cash proffer amount in place at the time a case was first heard by the planning commission. Cases were not subject to increases thereafter. This did cause some cases to be filed prematurely. CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 3 of 3 Meeting Date: July 27, 2005 Summary of Information (continued) Also note that the policy now includes language reflecting the Board action of June 2004 to discontinue credits for existing development while still retaining flexibility to give credits based on higher design/ development standards. Staff met with leaders of the development community July 12 to review the recommendation and policy changes. CHESTERFIELD COUNTY, VIRGINIA CASH PROFFER POLICY A. General Guidelines Pursuant to this policy, staff will (i) calculate the annual net cost of public facilities, (ii) calculate the fiscal impact of a rezoning request that permits residential uses and (iii) administer the collection and expenditure of proffered funds. The Board will accept cash proffers for rezoning requests that permit residential uses in accordance with this policy. However, the Board may also accept cash, land or in- kind improvements in accordance with county and state law. Transportation proffers for non-residential rezonings shall be computed by the Transportation Department on the same basis utilized prior to July, 1989, and at the Board's option, may include cash instead of improvements. Any cash proffer policy must meet a "reasonableness" or "rough proportionality" test, which requires the Board to determine in each zoning case whether the amount proffered is related both in nature and extent to the projected impact of the proposed development on public facilities. Through this policy, staff will be able to recommend a maximum proffer in each case that meets this test of reasonableness. o Staff determines the cost of public facilities generated by new growth by relying on the assumption that any revenue derived from growth (residential and commercial real estate taxes, sales taxes, fees, etc.) will pay all the normal operating costs for services to residents of new developments with no funds remaining to pay for the cost of public facilities needed to serve these residents. State and county laws permit the Board to accept cash proffers to fund the public facility needs generated by any new residential development. In determining the net cost per dwelling unit of a public facility, staff relies on countywide averages, where possible. In addition, staff will consider the five components described below, as well as any other unique circumstances of which staff is aware, related to an individual zoning case. o To determine how and where a proffer will be spent, the County is divided into geographic or service districts. For facilities which have a Countywide service district, (parks, libraries and fire stations), the proffer may be spent Countywide. For roads and schools, the proffer will be spent within smaller service districts as described below. 1014:23056.1 0000:1.4 o The following public facilities will be funded by cash proffers: schools, roads, parks, libraries and fire stations. The County does not currently accept cash proffers to fund public facilities such as jails, landfills and other government facilities. A development proposal's impact on capital facilities will be evaluated based on the gross number of proposed dwelling units. When calculating the gross number of dwelling units, staff will: a.) use the lesser of average actual recorded lot yields and the number of dwelling units proffered by the applicant and, b.) not give credits for those dwelling units permitted under existing conditions of zoning or agricultural lots, and will not consider the transferring of allowable units from other properties. The Board may consider development proposals that include substantial upgrades to current design/development standards and ordinance requirements as justification for accepting reduced cash proffer payments for the pre-existing lot yield. Pre-existing lot yields will be calculated using average actual recorded lot _yields provided the applicant has not otherwise submitted documentation indicating higher lot yields in conformance with existing ordinances and reflective of site specific physical features. o A development proposal's fiscal impact on capital facilities shall be established under the Board of Supervisors' cash proffer policy that is in effect at the time the application is submitted; however, if the Board of Supervisors changes the cash proffer policy while the application is still pending, the revised cash proffer policy shall be applied to the development proposal. A pending development proposal shall be subjected to only one revision, such revision being the first revision following the submission of the application. Cases decided by the Planning Commission prior to July 27, 2005 are exempt from this section. B. Methodology and Policy Terms There are five "components" involved in calculating what a new dwelling unit will cost the County in terms of providing public facilities. The components are as follows: 1014:23056.1 2 0000 .5 ao Demand generators - Staff uses the weighted average of single family and multi-family persons per household (2.79 for FY99) and an average number of students per household (.56 for FY99) to calculate demand generators (number of people and number of students) associated with a new dwelling unit. bo Service levels - Staff calculates existing service levels for each type of facility for which a cash proffer will be accepted. Examples of service levels are: 5.53 acres of park land per 1,000 people, 2.34 library books per person, and 99 square feet of space per elementary school child. (Service levels are calculated annually) Co Gross cost of public facilities. - Staff calculates the gross cost of public facilities. The term gross cost is used because a credit (described in (d) below) for anticipated future revenues from a new dwelling unit will be applied against the gross cost. For example, to calculate the gross cost of park facilities, multiply the average persons per dwelling unit by the cost per acre of park land plus improvement cost per acre of park land times the acres per capita. Credits - Staff calculates a credit to apply against the gross cost for each public facility. Chesterfield has issued and plans to continue to issue general obligation bonds to finance the construction of public facilities. Residents of new developments will pay real estate taxes to the County and a portion of these taxes will go to help retire this debt. So that new dwelling units are not paying twice (once through payment of a cash proffer and again through real estate taxes) a credit is computed. eo Net cost - Staff calculates the net cost per public facility or maximum cash proffer. This is the gross cost [(B)(1)(c)] per public facility minus the applicable credit [(B)(1)(d)] per public facility. ° There must be a relationship between the rezoning itself and the need for a public facility. In order to ensure that money proffered by an applicant is used to fund the public facilities necessitated by the development, geographic service areas or districts are established across the County. ao Since parks, libraries, and fire stations serve the entire County, the geographic service districts for these facilities are determined to be Countywide. Rezoning requests can be analyzed on a countywide basis to determine their impact on these facilities and proffers may be spent to fund these facilities Countywide. 1014:23056.1 3 O00O .G bo Rezoning requests can be analyzed on a countywide basis to determine their impact on schools. In order to ensure that money proffered by an applicant is used to fund the public facilities necessitated by the development, the county is divided into three geographic service districts corresponding to the attendance zones of grouped high schools. District one corresponds to the combined attendance zones for James River, Midlothian and Monacan High Schools, District two corresponds to the combined attendance zones for Clover Hill, Manchester and Matoaca High Schools, and District three corresponds to the combined attendance zones for Meadowbrook, Bird and Thomas Dale High Schools. Funds collected from a development within a District will be spent on school improvements within that District or for any school improvement which provides relief for the District in which the development is in. Co With respect to roads, rezoning requests are analyzed based on two geographic service districts, one north of Route 360 and one south of Route 360, to determine costs and impact. These service districts are used to calculate a road cost per dwelling unit. The Transportation Department has identified 19 traffic sheds across the County and money collected from a development within a particular shed will be spent on road improvements within that shed or on roads that provide relief to that shed. ° In some instances, a rezoning applicant may wish to mitigate the development's calculated impact on public facilities by dedicating property or doing in-kind improvements in lieu of all or a portion of the cash proffer. For property designated for dedication (excluding roads) staff will follow the County's "Procedure for Acquisition of Private Property for Public Use". The value of donated land generally will be based on the current assessed value of the property, not to exceed the cost per acre used in the calculation of the proffer. The value of improvements shall be the estimated cost as if constructed by a governmental entity. If the dedication or in-kind improvement does not fully mitigate the development's calculated impact on public facilities, then the dedication and/or improvement's value may be applied as a credit against the development's calculated impact on the applicable public facility. The credit cannot exceed the development's calculated impact on the applicable public facility. If the value of the dedication or improvement is more than the calculated impact, the County may pay the difference. Credit for roads may be allowed for off-site land dedication or improvements, as recommended by the Transportation Department. ° The County will continue to consider any unique circumstances about a proposed development that: (i) mitigate the development's projected impact on public 1014:23056.1 4 0000:1.7 o facilities; and (ii) create a demonstrable reduction in capital facility needs. Unique circumstances may include, but not be limited to, participation in regional road projects and elderly housing projects. Either the county, the zoning applicant or any other person may identify such mitigating circumstances. Payment of the cash proffer for residential development must occur prior to release of a building permit. Timing for dedication of property or in-kind improvements should be specified in the proffer. Cash proffers, property dedications and in-kind improvements must be used for projects identified in the Capital Improvement Program. The Capital Improvement Program is based in part on the County's Public Facilities Plan, which projects long-term facility needs. Cash proffer payments shall be used to fund schools, roads, parks, libraries and fire station capital facilities. Payments shall be expended in accordance with state law. Adjustments in the cash proffer amount may be considered every fiscal year. Staff will recompute net costs based on the current methodology and recommend adjustments. Any adjustments would be effective upon adoption, but no sooner than July 1 of the new fiscal year. The maximum cash proffer that the Board will accept from residential rezoning applicants is $17,000.00 per dwelling unit if paid prior to July 1, 2006, and $17,000.00 per dwelling unit plus the Marshall Swift Building Cost Index for payments made after June 30, 2006. Revised: July 27, 2005 1014:23056.1 0600J-8 CD CD 0000~9 W ! lB W 000020 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 / / I II 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 c:::) c::) ~ o o o o o o 0 0 0 0 0 0 c~ c~ O000~g.3 0 0 000024 mi 000025 00O026 z~'O 0 ~ ~:~ EF~ 0~ 0 ~ E 0 0 E ~ ~ ~ o -. = ~ ~ lm 0 0 0 0 000029 0 0 ~0 ~0 0 0 000030 O00O31 © © 000032 0 o 0 0~' 000033 i I ~- I ~'00~ ~O~ om~c ~'? .<mm_ ~ --.~0 ~0 000034 I1 I ll / 00003S ~ X o "~ ?m K co 0 .n 0 ~ 00 .-~ ~ 000036 000037 © © O000B$ X C) C) 000039 000040 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page I of 2 Meetin~l Date: Subiect: July 27, 2005 Item Number: 8.B.1. Nomination/Appointment to the Community Criminal Justice Board County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: It is requested that the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors approve the nominees for appointment to the Community Criminal Justice Board (CCJB) for two-year terms according to the adopted by-laws of the Community Criminal Justice Board. Appointments correspond to prescribed positions in the Code of Virginia. Summary of Information- The Community Criminal Justice Board (CCJB) serves the 12th Judicial Circuit Court consisting of Chesterfield County and the City of Colonial Heights. The purpose is to provide for the development, evaluation and planning of community programs and services for the court in diverting offenders from local correctional facilities. At the June 14, 1995 meeting, the Board adopted a resolution entitled Joint Resolution Providing for the Implementation of the Comprehensive Community Corrections Act (CCCA) and the Pretrial Services Act (PSA); Establishment of the Chesterfield County and City of Colonial Heights Community Criminal Justice Board; and provisions for Joint Exercise of Powers. The resolution designated the membership by position, according to the Code of Virginia. The Community Criminal Justice Board members serve for two-year staggered terms; thus ten members are appointed each year. Preparer: Bradford S. Hammer Title: Deputy County Administrator Attachments: Yes ~ No 000041 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 2 of 2 It is requested the following individuals be appointed to the Community Criminal Justice Board for a two-year term to commence July 1, 2005 and ending June 30, 2007. The Honorable Jerry Hendrick, Jr. The Honorable Philip V. Daffron The Honorable Mike Lee Raeford W. Walker Elvira Shaw Bradford S. Hammer William W. Bradham, Jr. Clarence G. Williams Dr. John Morgan D. Gregory Carr (Juvenile & Domestic Relations Court) (General District Court) (Commonwealth's Attorney) (Colonial Heights Citizen) (Colonial Heights Citizen) (Chesterfield Representative) (Chief Magistrate) (Sheriff) (CSB) (Defense Bar) It is requested the following individual be appointed to serve the remainder of a two-year appointment that began July 1, 2004 and ends June 30, 2006. Brad Peebles (Educator) Under the existing Rules of Procedure, appointments to Boards and Committees are nominated at one meeting and appointed at the subsequent meeting unless the Rules of Procedure are suspended by a unanimous vote of the Board members present. Nominees are voted on in the order in which they are nominated. 000042 Bradford S. Hammer Deputy County Administrator Chesterfield County, Virginia Human Services Administration 9901 Lori Road, Room SOO - P.O. Box 40 - Chesterfield, VA 23832 Phone: (804) 748-1350 - Fax: (804) 748-39S2 - Internet: chesterfield.gov TO: Honorable Members, Board of Supervisors Lane B. Ramsey, County Administrator FROM: Bradford S. Hammer, Deputy County Administrator for Human Services DATE: June 29, 2005 SUBJECT: Appointments - Community Criminal Justice Board The Community Criminal Justice Board (CCJB) serves the 12th Judicial Circuit consisting of Chesterfield County and the City of Colonial Heights. The purpose is to provide for the development, evaluation and planning of community programs and services for the court in diverting offenders from local correctional facilities. In September 1994, the General Assembly adopted legislation that created the Comprehensive Community Corrections Act and the Pretrial Services Act. These Acts required the creation of a Community Criminal Justice Board (CCJB). At the June 14, 1995 meeting, the Board of Supervisors adopted a Joint Resolution with the City of Colonial Heights creating the Community Criminal Justice Board. On June 13, 1995 the City of Colonial Heights adopted a similar resolution. Sixteen (16) of the twenty (20) Board appointments are in categories prescribed in the Code of Virginia. Four (4) appointments are discretionary with two (2) coming from Colonial Heights and two (2) coming from Chesterfield County. The two (2) discretionary appointments available at this time are from the City of Colonial Heights. To improve continuity, terms were staggered with one half of the members appointed in one year and one half of the members appointed in the following year. The attached lists will show the proposed nominees in bold with addresses and phone numbers. On June 7, 2005 the City of Colonial Heights reviewed a similar list of nominees. All nominees except Brad Peebles are currently serving on the Community Criminal Justice Board. The Executive Committee of the CCJB has recommended all nominees for reappointment. All have agreed to serve if reappointed. Both Chesterfield and the City of Colonial Heights must confirm all nominees. We respectfully request the Board to consider appointing these nominees for two-year terms as outlined in the attachment. grp Attachments Providing a FIRST CHOICE community through excellence in public service O0004B ®e CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page I of 4 Meetin~l Date: July 27, 2005 Item Number: 8.B.2. Subiect: Nominations/Appointments to the Youth Services Citizen Board County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Nominate/appoint members to serve on the Youth Services Citizen Board. Summary of Information: The purpose of the Youth Services Citizen Board (YSCB) is to advise the Board of Supervisors regarding planning and policies affecting youth development and to provide a community forum to focus on youth issues. TERMS EXPIRING The terms of appointment for the following youth members of the YSCB expired June 30, 2005: Marcus Childress, Thomas Dale High School, Bermuda District Brittney Walls, Thomas Dale High School, Bermuda District Cari Mueller, Clover Hill High School, Clover Hill District Toral Gandhi, Clover Hill High School, Clover Hill District Preparer: Jana D. Carter Title: Director, Youth Planning and Development Attachments: Yes No #000045 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 2 of 4 Sarah Adcock, Monacan High School, Clover Hill District Virginia Fuller, Monacan High School, Clover Hill District Andre Walters, Meadowbrook High School, Dale District Xuan Pham, Meadowbrook High School, Dale District Amanda Seymour, L.C. Bird High School, Dale District Katy Greenly, L.C. Bird High School, Dale District Devan Vaughan, Matoaca High School, Matoaca District Bryce Burton, Matoaca High School, Matoaca District Candace Rheinhart, Manchester High School, Matoaca District Tabitha Ballard, Manchester High School, Matoaca District Katie Valentine, Midlothian High School, Midlothian District Jennifer Barlow, Midlothian High School, Midlothian District Lauren Edwards, James River High School, Midlothian District Mary Conkright, James River High School, Midlothian District The terms of appointment for the following adult member expired June 30, 2005: Nicholas Malone, Clover Hill District APPOINTMENTS Bermuda District. Supervisor King has recommended that the Board reappoint Brittney Walls, a student at Thomas Dale High School, to the Youth Services Citizen Board for a term from July 1, 2005 through June 30, 2006. Mr. King also recommends that the board nominate and appoint Samori Robinson, a student at Thomas Dale High School, to the Youth Services Citizen Board for a term from July 1, 2005 through June 30, 2006. Ms. Walls and Mr. Robinson meet all eligibility requirements to fill the vacancies and have indicated their willingness to serve. Clover Hill District. Supervisor Warren has recommended that the Board reappoint Carl Mueller, a student at Clover Hill High School, to the Youth Services Citizen Board for a term from July 1, 2005 through June 30, 2006. Mr. Warren also recommends that the board reappoint Nichol&s Malone, an adult from the Clover Hill District, to the Youth Services Citizen Board for a term from July 1, 2005 through June 30, 2008. 000046 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 3 of 4 Supervisor Warren also recommends that the Board nominate and appoint Andrew Deitrick and Julie Burns, both students at Monacan High School, and Nicole Lawrence, a student at Clover Hill High School, to the Youth Services Citizen Board for a term from July 1, 2005 through June 30, 2006. Ms. Mueller, Mr. Malone, Mr. Deitrick, Ms. Burns and Ms. Lawrence meet all eligibility requirements to fill the vacancies and have indicated their willingness to serve. Matoaca District. Supervisor Humphrey has recommended that the Board reappoint Bryce Burton, a student at Matoaca High School, and Tabitha Ballard, a student at Manchester High School, to the Youth Services Citizen Board for a term from July 1, 2005 through June 30, 2006. Supervisor Humphrey also recommends that the Board nominate and appoint Cody D&nford, a student at Matoaca High School, and Jamie Brindle, a student at Manchester High School, to the Youth Services Citizen Board for a term from July 1, 2005 through June 30, 2006. Ms. Burton, Ms. Ballard, Mr. Danford and Mr. Brindle meet all eligibility requirements to fill the vacancies and have indicated their willingness to serve. Dale District. Supervisor Miller has recommended that the Board reappoint Amanda Seymour, a student at L.C. Bird High School, and Andre Walters, a student at Meadowbrook High School, to the Youth Services Citizen Board for a term from July 1, 2005 through June 30, 2006. Supervisor Miller also recommends that the Board nominate and appoint Sarah Hill, a student at L. C. Bird High School, to the Youth Services Citizen Board for a term from July 1, 2004 through June 30, 2005. Mr. Miller also recommends that the board appoint Crystal Thornhill, a student from Meadowbrook High School, to the Youth Services Citizen Board for a term from July 1, 2005 through June 30, 2006. Ms. Seymour, Mr. Walters, Ms. Hill and Ms. Thornhill meet all eligibility requirements to fill the vacancies and have indicated their willingness to serve. 000047 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 4 of 4 Midlothian District. Supervisor Barber has recommended that the Board reappoint L&uren Edwards, a student at James River High School, and Katie Valentine, a student at Midlothian High School, to the Youth Services Citizen Board for a term from July 1, 2005 through June 30, 2006. Ms. Edwards and Ms. Valentine meet all eligibility requirements to fill the vacancies and have indicated their willingness to serve. Under existing Rules of Procedure, appointments to boards and committees are nominated at one meeting and appointed at the subsequent meeting unless the Rules of Procedure are suspended by a unanimous vote of the Board members present. Nominees are voted on in the order in which they are nominated. CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page I of 3 Meetin~l Date: July27, 2005 Item Number: 8.C. Subiect: Streetlight Installation Cost Approvals County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: This item requests Board approval of new streetlight installations in the Clover Hill and Dale Districts. Summary of Information: Streetlight requests from individual citizens or civic groups are received in the Department of Environmental Engineering. Staff requests cost quotations from Dominion Virginia Power for each request received. When the quotations are received, staff re-examines each request and presents them at the next available regular meeting of the Board of Supervisors for consideration. Staff provides the Board with an evaluation of each request based on the following criteria: 1. Streetlights should be located at intersections; CONTINUED NEXT Preparer: Richard M. McEIfish Attachments: Yes -~No Title: Director, Environmental En,qineerinq # 000049 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 2 of 3 Summary of Information: (Continued) o There should be a minimum average of 600 vehicles per day (VPD) passing the requested location if it is an intersection, or 400 VPD if the requested location is not an intersection; ° Petitions are required and should include 75% of residents within 200 feet of the requested location and if at an intersection, a majority of those residents immediately adjacent to the intersection. Cost quotations from Dominion Virginia Power are valid for a period of 60 days. The Board, upon presentation of the cost quotation may approve, defer, or deny the expenditure of funds from available District Improvement Funds for the streetlight installation. If the expenditure is approved, staff authorizes Dominion Virginia Power to install the streetlight. A denial of a project will result in its cancellation and the District Improvement Fund will be charged the design cost shown; staff will notify the requestor of the denial. Projects cannot be deferred for more than 30 days due to quotation expiration. Quotation expiration has the same effect as a denial. CLOVER HILL DISTRICTs In the Lands End Subdivision: Harbour Pointe Road, in the cul-de-sac Cost to install streetlight: $7,402.77 (Design Costs $185.86) Does not meet minimum criteria for intersection or vehicles Der day In the Chestnut Hills Subdivision: Intersection of Grassy Knoll Lane and West Providence Road Cost to install streetlight: $890.71 (Design Costs $185.86) Does not meet minimum criterion for vehicles Der day CONTINUED NEXT PAGE 000050 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 3 of 3 Summary of Information: (Continued) DALE DISTRICT: In the Garland Heights Subdivision: · Intersection of Hopkins Road and Vauxhall Road Cost to install streetlight: $266.25 (Design Costs $185.86) Meets minimum criteri& Vauxhall Road, vicinity of trailers at Falling Creek Elementary School, on north side of street. Cost to install streetlight: $977.97 (Design Costs $185.86) Does not meet minimum criteria for intersection or vehicles per day For information regarding available balances in the District Improvement Fund accounts, please reference the District Improvement Fund Report. 00005~1, STREETLIGHT REQUEST Clover Hill District Request Received: August 10, 2004 Estimate Received: June 7, 2005 Estimate Requested: August 10, 2004 Days Estimate Outstanding: 301 NAME OF REQUESTOR: Ms. Jane Pritz ADDRESS: Brandermill Community Association 3001 East Boundary Terrace Midlothian, VA 23112 REQUESTED LOCATION: Harbour Pointe Road, in the cul-de-sac Cost to install streetlight: $7,402.77 POLICY CRITERIA: Intersection: Vehicles Per Day: Petition: Not Qualified, location is not an intersection Not Qualified, less than 400 vehicles per day Qualified Staff Comments: This request was submitted by Ms. Pritz on behalf of the Brandermill Community Association for the residents of the Lands End subdivision. 000052 Street Light Request Map July 27, 2005 This map is a copyrighted product of the Chesterfield County GIS Office. Street Light Legend ~ existing light · requested light N This map shows citizen requested streetlight installations in relation to existing streetlights. Existing streetlig ht info rmation was obtained from the Chesterfield County Environmental Engineering Department. 62O 310 620 Feet 000053 STREETLIGHT REQUEST Clover Hill District Request Received: October 10, 2004 Estimate Received: June 7, 2005 Estimate Requested: October 10, 2004 Days Estimate Outstanding: 240 NAME OF REQUESTOR: Ms. Audrey S. White ADDRESS: 2309 Grassy Knoll Lane Richmond, VA 23236 REQUESTED LOCATION: Intersection of Grassy Knoll Lane and W, Providence Road Cost to install streetlight: $890,7'1 POLICY CRITERIA: Intersection: Vehicles Per Day: Petition: Qualified Qualified Qualified Requestor Comments: "1 hope something can be done about this streetlight request. The more people I talk to, the more agree we need a streetiight for both safety and to find roads at night." 000054 Street Light Request Map July 27, 2005 This map is a copyrighted product of the Chesterfield County GIS Office. Street Light Legend ~ existing light · requested light N This map shows citizen requested streetlight installations in relation to existing streetlights. Existing streetlight information was obtained from the Chesterfield County Environmental Engineering Department. 240 120 240 Feet 000055 STREETLIGHT REQUEST Dale District Request Received: April 7, 2005 Estimate Received: June 21,2005 Estimate Requested: April 7, 2005 Days Estimate Outstanding: 75 NAME OF REQUESTOR: Mr. Wilbur G. Jamison ADDRESS: 4109 Vauxhall Road Richmond, VA 23234 REQUESTED LOCATION: Intersection of Hopkins Road and Vauxhall Road Cost to install streetlight: $266.25 POLICY CRITERIA: Intersection: Vehicles Per Day: Petition: Qualified Qualified Qualified Requestor Comments: "Hopkins Road is a fairly narrow road, twenty two (22) feet wide with seven (7) inch or less earth type shoulders, a two lane black top, and with shallow to fairly deep earth type ditches on each side of the road with moderate to increasingly heavy traffic. "Streetlighting at this location will provide additional security and be a great aid in assisting the elderly, partially disabled and other pedestrians who walk for pleasure and health reasons. The light will illuminate the area for a great distance and therefore make walking, biking, and driving less hazardous. "This lighting, in conjunction with the requested light on the north side of Vauxhall Road will help discourage vandalism activities by reducing the advantage of darkness and adding additional security for the classroom trailers at Falling Creek Elementary School." 000056 STREETLIGHT REQUEST Dale District Request Received: April 7, 2005 Estimate Received: June 21,2005 Estimate Requested: April 7, 2005 Days Estimate Outstanding: 75 NAME OF REQUESTOR: ADDRESS: Mr. Wilbur G. Jamison 4109 Vauxhall Road Richmond, VA 23234 REQUESTED LOCATION: Vauxhall Road, on the north side Elementary School Cost to install streetlight: $977.97 adjacent to the trailers at Falling Creek POLICY CRITERIA: Intersection: Vehicles Per Day: Petition: Not Qualified, location is not an intersection Qualified Qualified Requestor Comments: "Vauxhall Road is a blacktop two lane road running west from Hopkins Road. On the north side of the road, beyond the school parking lot exit, for about 500 feet there is brush over hanging the roadside ditch. This results in pedestrians blending in with the background and makes them difficult to see. Combined with the lack of a roadside shoulder or sidewalk, this forces pedestrians to either walk well into the road or push their way through the underbrush. "Installing a light at this location will be an added safety factor and help to eliminate the near misses that have been observed in the evenings and sometimes in the early part of the morning when some of the parents occasionally walk their children to school. This light would also serve to light the area around the class room trailers at the elementary school." 000057 Street Light Request Map July 27, 2005 This map is a copyrighted product of the Chesterfield County GIS Office. Street Light Legend ~ existing light · requested light N This map shows citizen requested streetlight installations in relation to existing streetlights. Existing streetlight information was obtained from the Chesterfield County Environmental Engineering Department. 4OO 200 400 Feet 000058 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page I of I Meetin~l Date: Subject: July 27, 2005 Item Number: 8.D.l.a. Resolution Recognizing Lieutenant Lanney C. Jones, Chesterfield Fire and Emergency Medical Services Department, Upon His Retirement County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Adoption of attached resolution. Summary of Information: Staff is requesting the recognition of Lieutenant Lanney C. Jones, Chesterfield Fire and Emergency Medical Services Department, Upon His Retirement on September 1, 2005, after serving the county for 20 years. Preparer: Chief Frank H. Edwards, Jr. Title: 2® Deputy Fire Chief Attachments: Yes ~ No # 000059 RECOGNIZING LIEUTENANT LANNEY C. JONES UPON HIS RETIREMENT WHEREAS, Lieutenant Lanney C. Jones will retire from the Chesterfield Fire and Emergency Medical Services Department, Chesterfield County, on September 1, 2005; and WHEREAS, Lieutenant Jones attended Recruit School Number 15 in 1984 and has faithfully served the county for 21 years in various assigr~raents as a Firefighter at the Chester and Dutch Gap Fire Stations; as a Sergeant and Lieutenant at the Clover Hill Fire Station; as a Lieutenant in the Emergency Medical Services Division and Chief Flight Paramedic at EMS Med-Flight I; and WHEREAS, Lieutenant Jones received two Emergency Medical Service Awards for his actions on March 6, 1990 and October 10, 1992 during the successful resuscitation of citizens in cardiac arrest; and WHEREAS, Lieutenant Jones has served in the position as Chief Flight Paramedic for EMS Med-Flight I for over nine years, faithfully serving the citizens of the Central Virginia Region; and WHEREAS, during his tenure as Chief Flight Paramedic, Lieutenant Jones established and fostered a cooperative and effective working relationship with the Virginia State Police; and WHEREAS, while assigned to Med-Flight I, Lieutenant Jones worked effectively with the leadership and staff of 33 counties, 16 hospitals and 88 emergency medical service agencies throughout the Central Virginia Region; and WHEREAS, Lieutenant Jones was instrumental in obtaining a second flight paramedic position for EMS Med-Flight I in 2003, and was also instrumental in expanding a cooperative relationship with local fire and EMS departments to provide additional paramedics for EMS Med-Flight I; and WHEREAS, Lieutenant Jones received a Unit Citation for his actions on April 13, 2003 during the rescue of four teenagers from the Appomattox River; and WHEREAS, Lieutenant Jones was recognized as Outstanding Career Officer of the Year in 2003; and WHEREAS, Lieutenant Jones was nominated by the Old Dominion Emergency Medical Services Alliance for the 2003 Governor's Award for Outstanding Pre-Hospital Provider; and WHEREAS, Lieutenant Jones has faithfully served as an active member of the State Emergency Medical Evacuation Committee. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors recognizes the contributions of Lieutenant Lanney C. Jones, expresses the appreciation of all residents for his service to the county, and extends appreciation for his dedicated service and congratulations upon his retirement. 000060 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page I of I Meetin~l Date: Subject: July 27, 2005 Item Number: 8.D.l.b. Resolution Recognizing Ms. Jo Amy Davis, Chesterfield Fire and Emergency Medical Services Department, Upon Her Retirement County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Staff requests the Board adopt the attached resolution. Summary of Information: Staff requests the Board adopt the attached resolution recognizing Ms. Jo Amy Davis for 29 years of service to Chesterfield County. Preparer: Paul Mauger Attachments: Yes ~ No Title: Fire Chief 000061 RECOGNIZING FIRE AND LIFE SAFETY EDUCATOR JO AMY DAVIS UPON HER RETIREMENT WHEREAS, Fire and Life Safety Educator Jo Amy Davis retired from Chesterfield Fire and Emergency Medical Services, Chesterfield County, after 29 years of service, on July 1, 2005; and WHEREAS, Ms. Davis began her service with Chesterfield Social Services as a Child Protective Services Social Worker from 1976 until 1983; and WHEREAS, Ms. Davis worked in the Child Welfare Bureau and Division of Licensing for the Commonwealth of Virginia Department of Social Services from 1983 until 1988; and WHEREAS, Ms Davis returned to Chesterfield in 1988, serving as the Executive Assistant to the County Administrator from 1988 through 1992; and WHEREAS, Ms Davis began working for Chesterfield Fire and Emergency Medical Services in February 1992 as the Community Based Program Manager; and WHEREAS, Ms Davis helped develop the county TQI program, and was in the first graduating class of TQI University; and WHEREAS, Ms Davis taught all of the initial TQI classes to the Chesterfield Fire and Emergency Medical Services staff; and WHEREAS, Ms Davis has been a member of the Emergency Operations Center Response Team since 1992; and WHEREAS, Ms Davis represented Chesterfield Fire and Emergency Medical Services on the Health Track Committee from 1992 until 2003, assisting with the organization and operation of the County Health Fair; and WHEREAS, Ms. Davis founded THE BEACON and the Community newsletter, serving as editor and publisher; and WHEREAS, Ms. Davis was transferred to the Fire and Life Safety Division as a Fire and Life Safety Educator; and WHEREAS, Ms. Davis started the CERT program in Chesterfield County by writing grants, obtained the funding and built a training team; and as of today, 200 citizens have been trained; and WHEREAS, Ms. Davis developed the fourth grade fire safety program on PowerPoint; and WHEREAS, Ms. Davis has educated approximately 15,000 fourth grade students in the area of fire safety in the past ten years. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors recognizes the contributions of Fire and Life Safety Educator Jo Amy Davis, expresses the appreciation of all residents for her service to the county, and extends appreciation for her dedicated service and congratulations upon her retirement. 000062 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page I of I Meetin~l Date: July 27, 2005 Item Number: 8.D.1.c. Subject: Resolution Recognizing August 1-7, 2005, as ~International Clown Week" County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Mr. Barber requested that the following resolution be adopted. Summary of Information: Mr. Barber requests that the Board of Supervisors adopt this resolution in recognition of the important role that clowns play in bringing smiles, hope and joy to others. Preparer: Donald J. Kappel Title: Director, Public Affairs Attachments: Yes -]No 000063 RECOGNIZING AUGUST 1-7, 2005 AS ~INTERNATIONAL CLOWN WEEK" WHEREAS, clowns have long been known as ambassadors of joy and goodwill; and WHEREAS; President Richard M. Nixon issued a proclamation establishing "National Clown Week" in August 1971; and WHEREAS, the resolution recognized that clowns bring happiness to children and adults around the world; and WHEREAS, during the week of August 1 to August 7, 2005, clowns will be participating in special activities to mark "International Clown Week" by sharing laughter, happiness and cheer with those confined to hospitals and nursing homes; and WHEREAS, during this same period, and every day, clowns will bring their special gift of merriment to activities and communities across the nation; and WHEREAS, in a world where daily headlines and newscasts can bring news of events around the world that are filled with sadness and tragedy, clowns provide happier times; and WHEREAS, in recognition of the efforts of all clowns to spread their joy and bring laughter, "International Clown Week" has been proclaimed for the week of August 1-7, 2005. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors recognizes the special role that clowns play in bringing smiles, hope and joy to millions of people all across the globe, including here in Virginia; wishes clowns everywhere continued merriment, and thanks them for the important role they play in our lives. 000064 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page I of I Meetin~l Date: July27, 2005 Item Number: 8.D.l.d. Subiect: Resolution Recognizing Mrs. Gloria M. Thysell, Information Systems Technology Department, Upon Her Retirement County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: The adoption of the attached resolution. Summary of Information: Mrs. Gloria M. Thysell retired from the Information Systems Technology Department after having provided over 23 years of service to the citizens of Chesterfield County. Preparer: William G. Russell Title: Acting Director of IST Attachments: Yes ~ No # 000065 RECOGNIZING MRS. GLORIA M. THYSELL, UPON HER RETIREMENT WHEREAS, Mrs. Gloria Thysell will retire from the Chesterfield County Information Systems Technoloqy Department on August 1, 2005, after providing 23 years of quality service to the citizens of Chesterfield County; and WHEREAS, Mrs. Thysell has faithfully served the county in the capacity of Application Team Leader for the Information Systems Technology Department; and WHEREAS, Mrs. Thysell has provided leadership to her team supporting the Community Development Division; and WHEREAS, Mrs. Thysell has provided quality support to the Community Development Division by developing and implementing business software solutions which have served the division and enhanced citizen services; and WHEREAS, Mrs. Thysell has provided quality support to the Central Library in their use of technology to implement their Circulation System; and WHEREAS, Mrs. Thysell has provided leadership and support for the development and implementation of the county's Geographic Information System (GIS); and WHEREAS, Mrs. Thysell has provided direction and quidance to her staff in developing effective, efficient, and reliable business software solutions; and WHEREAS, Mrs. Thysell has provided outstanding leadership in the analysis of business processes and the design of business software solutions; and WHEREAS, Mrs. Thysell's character, high ethical standards, dedication to Chesterfield County, and commitment to excellence are a model for all county employees; and WHEREAS, Mrs. Thysell has developed and maintained a technically proficient staff within IST to develop and support business software solutions; and WHEREAS, Mrs. Thysell has demonstrated compassion for willingness to assist staff, and been a model for integrity; and others, a WHEREAS, Mrs. Thysell has created a collaborative environment where her team members have developed new skills and kept pace with the changing technology environment; and WHEREAS, Mrs. Thysell has encouraged and challenged her team to achieve their own professional goals; and WHEREAS, Mrs. Thysell has provided the Chesterfield County Information Systems Technology Department with many years of loyal and dedicated service; and WHEREAS, Chesterfield County and the Board of Supervisors will miss Mrs. Thysell's dedicated service. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors recognizes Mrs. Gloria Thysell, and extends on behalf of its members and the citizens of Chesterfield County, appreciation for her service to the county, congratulations upon her retirement, and best wishes for a long and happy retirement. 000066 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page I of I Meetin~l Date: July 27, 2005 Item Number: 8.D.l.e. Subiect: Approval of a Resolution Designating Gravesend, Relationship for the Chesterfield 2007 and Jamestown 2007 Celebrations County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: England in a Twinning Board Action Requested: Approval of the attached resolution and establishment of the twinning relationship with Gravesend, England. Summary of Information: The attached resolution and historical reference survey document the relationships between Pocahontas and Chesterfield County and with her gravesite located in Gravesend, England. Gravesend, England has requested this twinning relationship because Pocahontas married John Rolfe who lived in the Bermuda District of Chesterfield County. The twinning relationship is largely symbolic because the marriage with John Rolfe established her relationship with England and the grave site at Gravesend represented the end. This resolution will be carried by a special delegation from Virginia representing Indians and Colonists and presented to officials of the Town of Gravesend and the Gravesham Borough Council. Preparer: Bradford S. Hammer Title: Deputy County Administrator Attachments: Yes ~ No OOO067 ESTABLISHING THE TWINNING RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE TOWN OF GRAVESEND AND BOROUGH OF GRAVESHAM, ENGLAND WHEREAS, the Commonwealth of Virginia has acknowledged the importance of the founding of Jamestown in 1607 to the nation and to Virginia; and WHEREAS, the County of Chesterfield has agreed to participate in the 400tn birthday of Jamestown through the celebration of "Chesterfield 2007 - 400 years"; and WHEREAS, the County of Chesterfield has a historic linkage with Jamestown through the Citie of Henricus and the home of John Rolfe and Pocahontas; and WHEREAS, the Borough of Gravesham, England and the Town of Gravesend, England have requested a twinning relationship with Chesterfield County acknowledging the historical connection between the two localities and the life of Pocahontas; and WHEREAS, the year 1607 represents the beginning through Jamestown and the year 1617 represents the end of Pocahontas's life at Gravesend; and WHEREAS, the consummation of a twinning relationship between the County of Chesterfield and the Town of Gravesend and the Borough of Gravesham will honor and promote the life of Pocahontas. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors, this 27th day of July 2005, publicly agrees to establish a twinning relationship with the Town of Gravesend and the Borough of Gravesham, England. AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that a copy of this resolution be provided to the Mayor of Gravesend, England and to the Chairperson of the Borough of Gravesham, England to acknowledge the beginning of the twinning relationship. 000065 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page I of I Meetin~l Date: July 27, 2005 Item Number: 8.D.l.f. Subject: Recognizing Mr. Christopher A. Hurley and Mr. Conor Blaine Wakeman Upon Attaining Rank of Eagle Scout County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Adoption of attached resolution. Summary of Information: Staff has received requests for the Board to adopt resolutions recognizing Mr. Christopher A. Hurley, Troop 840, and Mr. Conor Blaine Wakeman, Troop 829, upon attaining the rank of Eagle Scout. Preparer: Lisa Elko Title: Clerk to the Board Attachments: Yes ~ No 000069 WHEREAS, the Boy Scouts of America was incorporated by Mr. William D. Boyce on February 8, 1910, and was chartered by Congress in 1916; and WHEREAS, the Boy Scouts of America was founded to build character, provide citizenship training and promote physical fitness; and WHEREAS, after earning at least twenty-one merit badges in a wide variety of skills including leadership, service and outdoor life, serving in a leadership position in a troop, carrying out a service project beneficial to his community, being active in the troop, demonstrating Scout spirit, and living up to the Scout Oath and Law; and WHEREAS, Mr. Christopher A. Hurley, Troop 840, sponsored by Saint Michael's Episcopal Church, and Mr. Conor Blaine Wakeman, Troop 829, sponsored by Saint Matthias' Episcopal Church, have accomplished those high standards of commitment and have reached the long-sought goal of Eagle Scout, which is earned by only four percent of those individuals entering the Scouting movement; and WHEREAS, growing through his experiences in Scouting, learning the lessons of responsible citizenship, and endeavoring to prepare himself for a role as a leader in society, Christopher and Conor have distinguished themselves as members of a new generation of prepared young citizens of whom we can all be very proud. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors recognizes Mr. Christopher A. Hurley and Mr. Conor Blaine Wakeman, extends congratulations on their attainment of Eagle Scout, and acknowledges the good fortune of the county to have such outstanding young men as its citizens. 000070 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page I of I Meetin~l Date: July27, 2005 Item Number: 8.D.l.g. Subiect: Resolution Recognizing August 2, 2005, as "National Night Out" in Chesterfield County County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Summary of Information: This resolution is to recognize August 2, 2005, as National Night Out" in Chesterfield County. Preparer: Bryan Miltenber.qer Title: Crime Prevention Officer Attachments: Yes No OOO0'73. RECOGNIZING AUGUST 2, 2005 AS "NATIONAL NIGHT OUT" IN CHESTERFIELD COUNTY WHEREAS, each year in August, communities across the nation band together to demonstrate their unity in the fight against crime; and WHEREAS, this show of solidarity by law-abiding citizens has been named "National Night Out"; and WHEREAS, the National Night Out event taking place on August 2, 2005 will be the 22nd annual event of this type; and WHEREAS, last year's National Night Out campaign involved citizens, law enforcement agencies, civic groups, businesses, neighborhood organizations and local officials from 10,000 communities in 50 states, U.S. territories, Canadian cities and military bases worldwide; and WHEREAS, National Night Out is designed to heighten crime and drug prevention awareness; and WHEREAS, this event also generates support for, and partici'~ation in, local anti-crime programs; and WHEREAS, National Night Out strengthens neighborhood spirit and the relationships between police and the communities; and WHEREAS, these events send a message to criminals that the communities are organized and fighting back against crime; and WHEREAS, Chesterfield County has as one of its strategic goals: ~To be the safest and most secure community compared to similar jurisdictions"; and WHEREAS, National Night Out is an important component in the effort to achieve that goal. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors hereby recognizes August 2, 2005, as "National Night Out" in Chesterfield County, Virginia; thanks police, neighborhood watch groups and all others who have joined to prevent crime; and urges all residents and businesses in Chesterfield County to turn on their porch lights and other exterior lights and to gather with friends and neighbors on August 2, 2005 to demonstrate their unity in the fight against crime. O00072 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page I of I Meetin~l Date: July 27, 2005 Item Number: 8.D.l.h. Subject: Resolution Recognizing Mrs. Mary Lou Sapko, Social Services Department, Upon Her Retirement County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Staff requests the Board adopt the attached resolution. Summary of Information: Staff requests the Board adopt the attached resolution recognizing Mrs. Mary Lou Sapko for 20 years of service to Chesterfield/Colonial Heights Department of Social Services. Preparer: Sarah C. Snead Attachments: Yes ~ No Title: Director-Social Services #000073 RECOGNIZING MRS. MARY LOU SAPKO UPON HER RETIREMENT WHEREAS, Mrs. Mary Lou Sapko began her tenure in public service with Chesterfield County as a Social Work Aide in the Department of Social Services on February 4, 1985; and WHEREAS, Mrs. Sapko has worked tirelessly to promote the safety and well being of the children and families with whom she has worked; and WHEREAS, Mrs. Sapko has been committed to promoting quality parenting education through instruction and example; and WHEREAS, Mrs. Sapko has represented the Department of Social Services as a member of numerous committees that promote the dignity and self worth of our customers; and WHEREAS, Mrs. Sapko has availed herself of numerous training opportunities to enhance her professional growth and development; and WHEREAS, Mrs. Sapko has been a role model for teamwork and professionalism to her colleagues both in and outside of Chesterfield County. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors recognizes the outstanding contributions of Mrs. Mary Lou Sapko, expresses the appreciation of all residents for her service to the county and offers congratulations upon her retirement. 0000'74 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page I of I Meeting Date: July 27, 2005 Item Number: 8.D.1.i. Subiect: Recognizing Gerard W. Smith, Radio Shop Supervisor, Upon His Retirement, for 20 Years of Dedicated Service to the County County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Adoption of attached resolution Summary of Information: Staff requests the Board adopt the attached resolution recognizing Radio Shop Supervisor Gerard W. Smith for 20 years of service to Chesterfield County. Preparer: Francis M. Pitaro Title: Attachments: Yes ~ No Director, General Services # 000075 RECOGNIZING MR. GERARD W. SMITH UPON HIS RETIREMENT WHEREAS, Mr. Gerard W. Smith retired July 1, 2005 after providing twenty years of dedicated and faithful service to Chesterfield County; and WHEREAS, Mr. Smith began his service May 20, 1985 as a Communication/Electronic Supervisor, in the Department of General Services, Radio Shop Division, when it was a two-man operation; and WHEREAS, Mr. Smith has seen the county's radio system grow from two towers to ten towers and two technicians to fourteen; and WHEREAS, Mr. Smith was instrumental in the planning and installation of the regionally integrated 800 Megahertz Trunking Radio System in conjunction with Richmond and Henrico County; and WHEREAS, Mr. Smith oversaw the installation of the county's Mobile Data System providing instant access to information for Police and Fire personnel; and WHEREAS, Mr. Smith was selected as the Department of General Services' Employee of the Year for the years 1988 and 1992, based on his performance of duty, the superb efficiency demonstrated, his technical and supervisory talents and the always operational communications system; and WHEREAS, Mr. Smith always performed his duties and responsibilities in a professional manner and placed the welfare and safety of citizens and fellow county employees above his own personal comfort and feelings and will be missed by his fellow co-workers and customers. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors recognizes Mr. Gerard W. Smith and extends appreciation for his twenty years of dedicated service to the county, congratulations upon his retirement, and best wishes for a long and happy retirement. 000076 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page I of I Subject: Recognizing Ms. Rebecca Marie Chapin Upon Attaining the Gold Award County Administrator's Comments. County Administrator: t~'\~~ Board Action Requested: Adoption of attached resolution. .Summary of Information: Staff has received a request for the Board to adopt a resolution recognizing Ms. Rebecca Chapin, Troop 586, upon attaining the Gold Award. Preparer: Lisa Elko Title: Clerk to the Board Attachments: Yes ~-~ No RECOGNIZING MS. REBECCA MARIE CHAPIN UPON ATTAINING THE GOLD AWARD WHEREAS, the Girl Scouts of the United States of America is an organization serving over 2.6 million girls and was founded to promote citizenship training and personal development; and WHEREAS, after earning four interest project patches, the Career Exploration Pin, the Senior Girl Scout Leadership Award, the Senior Girl Scout Challenge, and designing and implementing a Girl Scout Gold Award project; and WHEREAS, the Gold Award is the highest achievement award in Girl Scouting and symbolizes outstanding accomplishments in the areas of leadership, community service, career planning, and personal development; and WHEREAS, the Girl Scout Award can only be earned by girls aged 14-17 or in grades 9-12 and is received by less than six percent of those individuals entering the Girl Scouting movement; and WHEREAS, Ms. Rebecca Marie Chapin, Troop 586, sponsored by Beulah United Methodist Church, has accomplished these high standards and has been honored with the Girl Scouts of America Gold Award by the Commonwealth Girl Scout Council of Virginia; and WHEREAS, growing through her experiences in Girl Scouting, learning the lessons of responsible citizenship, and priding herself on the great accomplishments of her country, Rebecca is indeed a member of a new generation of prepared young citizens of whom we can all be very proud. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors recognizes Ms. Rebecca Marie Chapin, extends congratulations on her attainment of the Gold Award and acknowledges the good fortune of the county to have such an outstanding young woman as one of its citizens. CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page I of 2 Meeting Date: July 27, 2005 Item Number: 8.D.2.a. Subject: Set Public Hearing Date to Consider Amending Section 17-73 of the Subdivision Ordinance Relating to Standards for Paving of Streets and Acceptance Into the State System County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: The Board of Supervisors is requested to set a public hearing date of August 24, 2005 to amend Section 17-73 of the Code of the County of Chesterfield 1997. Summary of Information: This item is to request that the Board of Supervisors set a public hearing date of August 24, 2005 for discussion of an amendment to the subdivision ordinance. This amendment would allow a developer, at his option and at time of recordation, to post a bond for 125 percent of a development's construction allowing builders to obtain 100 percent of their building permits. This bond could be reduced only once during development of the subdivision by 40 percent. District: Countywide Preparer: Richard M. McEIfish Attachments: Yes Title: Director, Environmental Engineerina ---]No # 000077 AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE CODE OF THE COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD, 1997, AS AMENDED, BY AMENDING AND RE-ENACTING SECTION 17-73 RELATING TO STANDARDS FOR PAVING OF STREETS AND ACCEPTANCE INTO THE STATE SYSTEM BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County: (1) That Section 17-73 of the Code of the County o£ Chesterfield, 1997, as amended, is amended and re-enacted to read as follows: Sec. 17-73. Installation of improvements and bonding. (a) Prior to record plat approval, after all other required approvals are obtained, all improvements shown on the approved construction plans shall be completed to the satisfaction of the directors of environmental engineering and utilities, at the expense of the subdivider. In lieu of actual completion of the required improvements, the subdivider may record a plat by furnishing to the director of environmental engineering surety in the form approved by the county attorney's office consisting of: (1) A certified check; (2) Cash escrow; (3) A surety bond; or (4) A bank's letter of credit. The amount of the surety shall be sufficient to cover the costs and guarantee the installation and completion of all required improvements. The surety amount shall be approved by the director of environmental engineering based upon unit prices for new construction in the county. The surety may also include a reasonable allowance for estimated administrative costs, inflation and potential damage to existing streets or utilities which shall not exceed 25 percent of the estimated construction costs. If the subdivider proceeds by this method, the subdivider shall install and complete the required improvements to the satisfaction of the director of environmental engineering subject to the following conditions: (1) The streets shall be accepted into the state system not more than two years after the date of plat recordation. (2) No more than 60 percent of the building permits in any recorded section of a residential or residential townhouse subdivision shall be issued until the paving requirements in that section have been completed. (3) Nc. Except as provided in subparagraph (4) below, no more than 90 percent of the building permits in any section of a residential or residential townhouse subdivision shall be issued until the streets have been constructed to state standards and accepted into the state system as applicable. (4) If the subdivider wishes to be eligible to have 100% of the building permits in a residential or a residential townhouse subdivision released prior to the streets having been completed and accepted into the state system, the subdivider must initially provide surety in an amount equal to 125% of the costs of all the OOO0?8 2723(05):68491.2 1 improvements shown on the approved construction plans. In addition, the subdivider must waive, by contract, its right to partial releases of the surety as provided under subparagraph (b) of this section and Va. Code § 15.2-2241; instead, the subdivider will be entitled to only one partial release of not more that 40% of its surety available once 90 percent of the building permits in any section have been issued. (4-)(5) An extension may be approved by the director of environmental engineering to condition three ~. (b) Surety reductions, as approved by the director of environmental engineering may be made in a cumulative amount of not more than 90 percent of the total cost of satisfactorily completed required improvements. Surety reductions based upon the percentage of improvements completed may not occur before the completion of at least 30 percent of the improvements. The director of environmental engineering shall not execute more than three surety reductions in any 12-month period per bonded subdivision section. Upon final completion and acceptance of said improvements in residential or residential townhouse subdivisions with streets, the release of any remaining surety shall be subject to the requirements of section 17-74. For the purpose of final release, the term "acceptance" shall be defined as the date of the meeting of the county's board of supervisors (board), at which the board is formally advised of the street acceptance by VDOT and assignment of the state route number(s). Upon final completion and acceptance of said improvements in residential townhouse subdivisions, the release of any remaining surety shall be subject to requirements of section 17- 74. For the purpose of final release the term "acceptance" shall be the date of the written notice to the subdivider of the completion of the required improvements to the satisfaction of the director of environmental engineering. (2) That this ordinance shall become effective immediately upon adoption. 2723(05) :68491.2 2 0 0 0 0~7 9 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page I of Meetin~l Date: July 27, 2005 Item Number: 8.D.2.b. Subiect: Set Public Hearing Date to Consider Proposed Minor Amendments to the Chesapeake Bay Preservation Ordinance of the Zoning Ordinance County Administrator's Comments: ~_~o/ County Administrator: ~ Board Action Requested: The Board of Supervisors is requested to set a public hearing date of August 24, 2005 to amend and re-enact Sections 19-25, 19-232, 19-233, 19-236 and 19- 301 of the Code of County of Chesterfield 1997. Executive Summary: On November 26, 2004, the Board of Supervisors adopted amendments to the county's Chesapeake Bay Preservation Ordinance. After the board's adoption, the amendments were submitted to the Chesapeake Bay Local Assistance Board (CBLAB) for their review and approval. Although the amendments were approved, five conditions were imposed requiring several minor changes to the amendments as adopted by the Board of Supervisors. Accordingly, staff has revised the ordinance to include the changes called for by CBLAB. The amendments also provide for a fee to cover the costs of hearings, advertising and notices for application to the Board of Supervisors seeking an exception to the Resource Protection Act regulations. The proposed amendments and an explanatory summary are attached for your consideration and the amended verbiage is underlined. These proposed changes do not alter the intent of the amendments adopted on November 26th. Staff from the Department of Conservation & Recreation's Division of Chesapeake Bay Local Assistance has approved the draft amendments. Preparer: Richard M. McEIfish Attachments: Yes Title: Director, Environmental Engineering [--~ No # 000080 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 2 of 2.- Summary of Proposed Revisions: Sec. 19-25. Fees. The amendments also provide for a fee to cover the costs of hearings, advertising and notices for application to the Board of Supervisors seeking an exception to the Resource Protection Act regulations Sec. 19-232 (d). Resource protection area regulations. The section that provides for the director of environmental engineering to administratively grant exceptions has been clarified regarding the procedures by which such exceptions are granted. Sec. 19-233 (g). General performance criteria. The section relating to BMP maintenance has been clarified to provide that while apartments are exempt from the requirement for a surety bond, bank letter of credit or cash escrow for BMP maintenance, they are not exempt from the general requirement to enter into and comply with a BMP maintenance/easement agreement. Sec. 19-233 (h). General performance criteria. The exemption provided for agricultural uses has been clarified to stipulate that such uses are not exempt from the requirement to complete a soil and water quality conservation assessment; Sec. 19-236. Nonconforming uses, vested rights and other exceptions. The provision that allows administrative exceptions for the expansion of nonconforming structures has been amended to clarify that such exceptions are not permitted for accessory structures. Sec. 19-301. Definitions. Definitions for highly erodible soils and permeable soils have been amended and a definition for public road added, to conform to the new definitions for these items in the Chesapeake Bay Preservation Area Designation and Management Regulations. District: Countywide 00008:1. AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE CODE OF THE COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD, 1997, AS AMENDED, BY AMENDING AND RE-ENACTING SECTIONS 19-25, 19-232, 19-233, 19-236, and 19-301 RELATING TO THE CHESAPEAKE BAY PRESERVATION ACT REQUIREMENTS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE AND PROVIDING FOR AN APPLICATION FEE FOR CERTAIN RPA EXCEPTIONS FROM SUCH REQUIREMENTS BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County: (1) That Sections 19-25, 19-232, 19-233, 19-236, and 19-301 of the Code o£ the County of Chesterfield, 1997, as amended, are amended and re-enacted to read as follows: Sec. 19-25. Fees. The following fees, which include the costs of hearings, advertisements and notices when required, shall be deposited simultaneously with the filing of the application: ooo (1) Modifications to development standards and requirements: (1) Any request for R, R-TH, R-MF, MH or A uses... 300.00 (2) Any request for O, I or C uses... 240.00 (m) Application to Board of Supervisors for RPA exception per 19-235(b)(2) . . . $1,500.00 ~-,/r~ (n)Deferral/remand requests by the applicant, per request: (1) Remand request to planning commission: a. Any request for R, R-TH, R-MF, MH or A uses... 50 percent of original case fee ooo Sec. 19-232. Resource protection area regulations. In addition to the general performance criteria set forth in section 19-233, the criteria in this section are applicable in resource protection areas. ooo (d) Permitted encroachments into the RPA buffer area. (1) When the application of the RPA buffer area would result in the loss of a buildable area on a lot or parcel recorded prior to October 1, 1989, encroachments into the RPA buffer area may be ~" ..... '~ ~' ..... ~, n~ ad~*~n~ .......... v ...... , permitted by the director of environmental engineering. A written request shall identify the impact of the proposed exception on water quality, on public safety and on lands within the resource protection area through the completion of a water quality impact assessment that complies with section 19-232(e) and shall be in accordance with the following criteria: 1923:68762.1 000 082 Revised 06/03/05 8:39 AM a. Encroachments into the RPA buffer area shall be the minimum necessary to achieve a buildable area for a principal structure and necessary utilities. b. Where practicable, a vegetated area that will maximize water quality protection, mitigate the effects of the RPA buffer area encroachment, and is equal to the area of encroachment into the RPA buffer area shall be established elsewhere on the lot or parcel. c. The encroachment may not extend into the seaward 50 feet of the RPA buffer area. (2) When the application of the RPA buffer area would result in the loss of a buildable area on a lot or parcel recorded between October 1, 1989 and March 1, 2002, encroachments into the RPA buffer area may be allowed through an administrative process in accordance with the following criteria: a. The lot or parcel was created as a result of a legal process conducted in conformity with the county's subdivision ordinance; b. Conditions or mitigation measures imposed through a previously approved exception shall be met; c. If the use of a Best Management Practice (BMP) was previously required, the BMP shall be evaluated to determine if it continues to function effectively and, if necessary, the BMP shall be reestablished or repaired and maintained as required; d. The requirements of section 19-232(d)(1) shall be met. (3) When the application of the RPA buffer area would result in the loss of a buildable area on a lot or parcel created as the result of bankruptcy, condemnation or threat of condemnation, judicial partition or judicial action relating to a decedent's estate, encroachments into the RPA buffer area may be allowed through an administrative process in accordance with the requirements of 19-232(d)(2)(b), (c) and (d). ooo Sec. 19-233. General performance criteria. Any use, development or redevelopment of land within a Chesapeake Bay preservation area shall meet the following performance criteria: ooo (g) Where the best management practices utilized in a commercial development require regular or periodic maintenance in order to continue their functions, such maintenance shall be ensured by a maintenance/easement agreement, commercial surety bond, bank letter of credit or other assurance satisfactory to the director of environmental engineering. Where the best management practices utilized for a residential development require regular or periodic maintenance in order to 1923:68762.1 000082 Revised 06/03/05 8:39 AM continue their functions, such maintenance shall be ensured by a commercial surety bond, bank letter of credit or cash escrow in an amount equal to $100.00 for each dwelling unit in a residential development. The requirement for a surety bond, bank letter of credit or cash escrow excludes apartment developments outside the Swift Creek Reservoir Watershed. The form of any bond or letter of credit provided pursuant to this section shall be subject to approval by the county attorney. (h) Land on which agricultural activities are being conducted, including but not limited to crop production, pasture, and dairy and feedlot operations, shall have a soil and water quality conservation assessment conducted that evaluates the effectiveness of existing practices pertaining to soil erosion and sediment control, nutrient management, and management of pesticides and, where necessary, results in a plan that outlines additional practices needed to ensure that water quality protection is being accomplished consistent with the Chesapeake Bay Preservation Act and this division. Except for the requirement for a soil and water quality conservation assessment, RMA performance criteria shall not apply to land used for agricultural purposes. ooo Sec. 19-236. Nonconforming uses, vested rights and other exceptions. (1) In addition to the requirements of this chapter, no use which is nonconforming to the requirements of this division, in a Chesapeake Bay preservation area, shall be enlarged, extended, reconstructed, substituted or structurally altered unless the director of environmental engineering grants an exception pursuant to section 19-235, and also finds that: (a) There will be no net increase in the nonpoint source pollution load; and (b) Any development or land disturbance exceeding an area of 2,500 square feet complies with all erosion and sediment control requirements of chapter 8 and division 4 of article IV of this chapter. This exception for non-conforming uses is not available for accessory structures. (2) This division shall not be construed to prevent the reconstruction of pre-existing structures within Chesapeake Bay Preservation Areas from occurring as a result of casualty loss unless otherwise restricted by applicable ordinance. (3) The provisions of this division shall not affect the vested rights of any landowner under existing law. (4) The provisions of this division shall not be construed to require or allow the taking of private property for public use without just compensation. ooo Sec. 19-301. Definitions. For the purposes of this chapter, the following words and phrases shall have the following meanings: ooo Highly erodible soils: Soils (excluding vegetation) with an erodibility index (EI) from sheet and rill erosion equal to or greater than 8. The erodibility index for any soil is defined as the product of the formula RKLS/T, .,..4~c;~.4 ~.., ~u~ ,,~a e .... ..;,., ^ ~ m e ^ ~ ~,~ ..... ,,, ^c ^ ...~,,~, ~ n 1923:68762.1 Revised 06/03/05 8:39 AM 000084 Conser~:atlcn Service, where K is the soil susceptibility to water erosion in the surface layer, R is the rainfall and runoff, LS is the combined effects of slope length and steepness, and T is the soil loss tolerance. Highly permeable soils: Soils with a given potential to transmit water through the soil profile. Highly permeable soils are identified as any soils having a permeability equal to or greater than six inches of water movement per hour in any part of the soil profile to a depth of 72 inches (permeability groups "rapid" and "very rapid") as found in the "National Soils Handbook" of Jqa-l-y ~ ,, .......... November 1996 in the Field Office Technical Guide" of the U.S. Department of Agriculture Soil Natural Resources Conservation Service. ooo Public road: A publicly owned road designed and constructed in accordance with water quality protection criteria at least as stringent as requirements applicable to the Virginia Department of Transportation, including regulations promulgated pursuant to (i) the Erosion and Sediment Control Law (§ 10.1-560 et seq. of the Code of Virginia) and (ii) the Virginia Stormwater Management Act (§ 10.1-603.1 et seq. of the Code of Virginia). This definition includes those roads where the Virginia Department of Transportation exercises direct supervision over the design or construction activities, or both, and cases where secondary roads are constructed or maintained, or both, by a local government in accordance with the standards of that local government. This definition applies only to Article IV, Division 4 (Chesapeake Bay Preservation Areas) of this chapter. (2) That this ordinance shall become effective immediately upon adoption. 1923:68762.1 Revised 06/03/05 8:39 AM 000085 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page I of 2 Meetin~l Date: July 27, 2005 Item Number: 8.D.2.c. Subject: Set Public Hearing to Amend Sections 19-185, 19-192, 19-195, 19-199, and 19-523 of the Code of the County of Chesterfield, 1997, as Amended Relating to Setbacks in Industrial Zoned Districts County Administrator's Comments= /?~ ~-~L/~ //~~ ~, ~ County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Board of Supervisors set August 24, 2005 for a public hearing to consider amendments to the Code of the County of Chesterfield. Summary of Information: The Planning Commission held their public hearing on the attached industrial zoning district setbacks and buffer ordinance amendments on June 21, 2005. One citizen spoke asking how these amendments would affect the area near her residence. Following their public hearing, the Planning Commission unanimously recommended denial of the ordinance amendment relating to the I-1 Zoning District, and unanimously recommended approval of the ordinance amendments relating to I-2 and I-3 Zoning Districts and to the amendments to the buffer matrix. These amendments are attached. The Planning Department has a continuing project to update the zoning and subdivision ordinances in response to the needs of our citizens, the development community and code enforcement activities. These amendments are in response to property owner concerns that the large industrial district setbacks adopted in the 1972 Zoning Ordinance are not necessary today because the county-wide development standards adopted in 1994 provide appropriate transitions between uses. These standards include buffers, screening of loading and outside storage areas, lighting controls, and architectural controls including screening of mechanical equipment. Preparer: Kirkland A. Turner Attachments: Title: Director of Planninq C:DATA/AGENDA/20031JUNE231AMENTS/GOK Yes ~ No 000056 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 2 of 2 Summary of Droposed industrial zoning districts and buffer ordinance amendments (sections 19-185, 19-192,19-195, 19-199, and 19-523) The amendment will make the following changes to each of the industrial zoning districts (I-l, I-2 and I-3): · Delete the additional setback requirement stated in each of the industrial zoning districts. · Increase the application of landscaped buffers between industrial districts and properties zoned A (agriculture) that have a residential use or that may include residential uses in the future. The amendment also reapplies the I-3 industrial district setback of 300 feet to junkyards that are listed as a restricted use in I-3 Districts. 000087 AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE CODE OF THE COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD, 1997, AS AMENDED, BY AMENDING AND RE-ENACTING SECTION 19-185, 19-192, 19-195, 19-199 AND 19-523 RELATING TO SETBACKS IN INDUSTRIAL ZONED DISTRICTS BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County: (1) That Sections 19-185, 19-192, 19-195, 19-199 and 19-523 of the Code of the Count~ of Chesterfield, 1997, as amended, are amended and re-enacted to read as follows: Sec. 19-185. Required conditions. In addition to the other requirements of this chapter, the conditions specified in this section shall be met in the I-1 District. (a) All uses, including storage, shall be conducted entirely within an enclosed building, except for accessory parking, loading and unloading facilities, and vehicle storage as allowed per section 19-181 (j). (b) The uses permitted in this district shall be those uses which are dependent upon raw materials first processed elsewhere. ..................... j .... , .................... , ~,,..,.,j..,~,, tO ...... n ~t) (c) Loading areas shall be oriented away from any existing R, R-TH or R-MF District or property currently zoned agricultural and shown on the comprehensive plan for residential use. O00 Sec. 19-192. Required conditions. In addition to the other requirements of this chapter, the conditions specified in this section shah be met Jn the I-2 District. (a) The uses permitted in this district are those uses which are dependent upon raw materials first processed elsewhere. OOO Sec. 19-195. Uses per~tted with certain restrictions. The following uses shall be pe~tted in the I-3 District, subject to compliance with the following conditions and other applicable stand.ds of this chapter. If the following restrictions cannot be met, these uses may be allowed by con~tional use, subject to the provisions of section 19- 13: (c) 1923:65486.3 Junkyards provided that: O00 3 000085 (1) Such use is set back at least 100 feet from rights-of-way, 200 feet from any O, C or I-1 District and 300 feet from any A, R, R-TH, or R-MF District, subject to section 19- 000 Sec. 19-199. o .... .'.~a ....-.m:.,.,. Reserved. 000 Secs. 19-523. Buffer width matrix. The required width of buffers shall be determined from the following matrix. The left column of the matrix represents the zoning of the lot on which the buffer must be provided and the top column of the matrix represents the zoning district of property contiguous to the zoning lot. The interior numbers in the matrix represent the width in feet of the required buffer on the zoning lot. However, whenever the primary_ use on a parcel zoned O, C or I is a single family residential subdivision, adjacent parcels shall be required to apply the buffer matrix below as though the property is residentially zoned. BUFFER WIDTH MATRIX TABLE INSET: R-7/88 A* R-TH/R-MF MH Districts A* + + R-7/88 _+ + R-TH/R-MF + 50** MH Districts + 50** O-1 + 40 0-2 + 5_0_0 C-1 + 4_9.0 C-2 + 5_._Q0 c-3 + 75 C-4 + 75 C-5 + 100 I- 1 + 50 50 1-2 + (75) 75 I-3 + (100) 100 *Note: In all zoning districts except Industrial zoned districts, tgbuffers are only required adjacent to property zoned "A" when the property is vacant and its designation on the comprehensive plan is for residential uses. Property zoned I-1 through 1-3 requires a buffer when adjacent to property zoned "A" that is occupied by a residential use or the property is designated on the comprehensive plan for residential uses. **Note: Where property zoned R-7 through R-88 is adjacent to property zoned R-TH, R-MF, or MH, a buffer shall be required on the R-TH, R-MF, or MH property. No buffers are necessary_ between any single-family residential districts unless required by the board of supervisors, 1923:65486.3 4 0 0 0 0;~ ~ planning commission (modification to development standards and requirements only) or board of zoning appeals. (2) That this ordinance shall become effective immediately upon adoption. 1923:65486.3 5 0 0 0 0 9 0 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page I of 2 Meetin~l Date: Subject: July 27, 2005 Item Number: 8.D.3. Approval of FY2006 Chesterfield Community Services Board Performance Contract County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Approve the FY06 Performance Contract between the Chesterfield Community Services Board and the Virginia Department of Mental Health, Mental Retardation, and Substance Abuse Services. Summary of Information: The State Code of Virginia Section 37.1-198 requires the governing body of each CSB to approve the annual performance contract through a formal vote. The CSB Board signed the FY06 Performance Contract at a regular meeting held on June 16, 2005. The performance contract describes the scope and requirements of both the CSB and State and includes exhibits that detail: all revenues, costs, number of persons projected to be served, and the types of services to be provided. The performance contract provides resources for infants, children, adolescents and adults in areas of mental health- $8,853,500, mental retardation-S15,551,100 and substance abuse-S3,900,832 for a total of $28,305,432. These funds were made a part of the FY2006 county budget. A copy of the performance contract document is filed with the Deputy County Administrator, Human Services. Preparer: Geor.qe Braunstein Title: Executive Director Attachments: ~-~ Yes No OOO091 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page I of I Meetin~l Date: July 27, 2005 Subiect: State Road Acceptance County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Item Number: 8.D.4. Summary of Information: Bermuda: Dale: Clover Hill: Matoaca: Duxton Winfree's Colony Burray at the Highlands Lyndenwood at the Highlands Oak Lake Business Center, Phase 1 Rivers Trace, Section D Tanner Village, Section B; remainder of Preparer: Richard M. McEIfish Attachments: Yes Title: Director, Environmental En,qineerinq ]-~No 000092 TO: Board of Supervisors FROM: Department of Environmental Engineering SUBJECT: State Road Acceptance- DUXTON DISTRICT: BERMUDA MEETING DATE: 27 July 2005 ROADS FOR CONSIDERATION: DUXTON CT DUXTON DR Vicinity Map: DUXTON Produced By Chesterfield County GIS 000093 TO: Board of Supervisors FROM: Department of Environmental Engineering SUBJECT: State Road Acceptance - WINFREES COLONY DISTRICT: BERMUDA MEETING DATE: 27 July 2005 ROADS FOR CONSIDERATION: WlNFREE CIR WINFREE ST Vicinity Map: WINFREES COLONY Produced By Chesterfield County GIS OOO094 TO: Board of Supervisors FROM: Department of Environmental Engineering SUBJECT: State Road Acceptance - BURRAY AT THE HIGHLANDS DISTRICT: DALE MEETING DATE: 27 July 2005 ROADS FOR CONSIDERATION: BURRAY CT BURRAY RD Vicinity Map: BURRAY AT THE HIGHLANDS Produced By Chesterfield County GIS 000095 TO: Board of Supervisors FROM' Department of Environmental Engineering SUBJECT: State Road Acceptance - LYNDENWOOD AT THE HIGHLANDS DISTRICT: DALE MEETING DATE: 27 July 2005 ROADS FOR CONSIDERATION: MACANDREW CT MACANDREW LN MACANDREW PL Vicinity Map: LYNDENWOOD AT THE HIGHLANDS W Produced By Chesterfield County GIS 000096 TO: Board of Supervisors FROM: Department of Environmental Engineering SUBJECT: State Road Acceptance - Oak Lake Business Center, Phase 1 DISTRICT: CLOVER HILL MEETING DATE: 27 July 2005 ROADS FOR CONSIDERATION: OAK LAKE BLVD OAK LAKE CT Vicinity Map: Oak Lake Business Center, Phase 1 OAF, LAKF-- CT rNIT Produced By Chesterfield County GIS 000097 TO: Board of Supervisors FROM: Department of Environmental Engineering SUBJECT: State Road Acceptance - RIVERS TRACE, SEC D DISTRICT: MATOACA MEETING DATE: 27 July 2005 ROADS FOR CONSIDERATION: DEVLIN DR PYPERS POINTE DR ST AUDRIES DR Vicinity Map: RIVERS TRACE, SEC D Produced By Cheste~eld County GIS 000098 TO: Board of Supervisors FROM: Department of Environmental Engineering SUBJECT: State Road Acceptance - TANNER VILLAGE, SEC B; REMAINDER OF DISTRICT: MATOACA MEETING DATE: 27 July 2005 ROADS FOR CONSIDERATION: JEFFRIES TER Vicinity Map: TANNER VILLAGE, SEC B; REMAINDER OF ! Produced By Chesterfield County GIS 000099 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page I of 2. Meetin~ Date: July 27, 2005 Item Number: 8.D.5. Subiect: Approval of Utility Contract for Bendahl Valley - Section A, Contract Number 04-0128 County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors approve this contract and authorize the County Administrator to execute any necessary documents. Summary of Information: This project includes the extension of 2,208 L.F.± of 15" oversized wastewater lines which includes 1,222 L.F.± of offsite wastewater lines. The Developer is required to have an 8" wastewater line to serve his development. Staff has requested that the wastewater lines be oversized to provide service to the adjoining properties. In accordance with the ordinance, the Developer is entitled to refunds through connection fees for the construction cost of the oversized and offsite improvements. Developer: Ben Val Development Company, LLC Contractor: R. J. Smith Construction Inc. Contract Amount: Estimated County Cost for Oversizing .................. $17,664.00 Estimated County Cost for Offsite ..................... $22,755.00 Estimated Developer Cost ............................. $360,368.29 Estimated Total ...................................... $400,787.29 Code: Refunds thru Connections - Oversizing Refunds thru Connections - Offsite 5N-572VO-E4C 5N-572VO-E4D District: Dale Preparer: Craig S. Bryant Attachments: Ycs Title: [--] Director of Utilities ~O00~LO0 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 2 of 2 Meeting Date: July 27, 2005 Bud.qet and Management Comments: This item requests that the Board approve a contract to R.J. Smith Construction, Inc. for the Bendahl Valley, Section A wastewater line project. County ordinance entitles the developer to refunds through connection fees and funding for refunds has been appropriated in the FY2006 budget. No additional appropriation is necessary to cover the cost for this project. Preparer: Rebecca T. Dickson Title: Director, Budget and Manaqement 000:1.0 . VICINITY SKETCH Bendahl Valley Sec. - A County Project # 04-0128 Proposed 15" Wastewater Line Co. Proj. #04-0128 Proposed Oversized 15" Wastewater Line Co. Proj. # 04-0128 Proposed Bendahl Valley - Sec. A Subdivision Co. Proj. #04-0128 N Chesterfield Count,/Department of Utilitie~ 00010;8 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page I of 5 Meetin~l Date: July 27, 2005 Item Number: 8.D.6. Subject: County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Acceptance and Appropriation of Funds from Department of Environmental Quality; Appropriation of Construction Funds and Approval of Construction Contract for 5911 Nena Grove Lane (formerly Carver Heights Drive) Water Improvements - County Project Number 94-0127 Board Action Requested: Accept and appropriate funds from DEQ; appropriate $30,000 from Utilities water fund balance to 5H-58350-940127E; award construction contract for the 5911 Nena Grove Lane Water Improvements to Perkinson Construction, LLC in the amount of $52,668; and authorize the County Administrator to execute all necessary documents. Summary of Information: As the result of recent issues relating to the environmental impact of the soil conditions within the Carver Heights Mandatory Water Connection Area, it was brought to the County's attention that there is an existing structure within the Mandatory Water Connections Area [as defined by Section 18-63.(a) of the county code] that does not have public water available without having to extend the public water lines. The property is owned by W.T. Curd, Jr. Contractor, Inc., which is located at 5911 Nena Grove Lane. In the early 1980's, the Board approved the creation of the Mandatory Water Connection for the Carver Heights Area. On August 22, 1984, the Board approved funding a project to extend public water lines to those properties within this area, however, the Curd property was not served. Staff has obtained funding from the Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ). We have secured an Agreement whereby they will contribute 50% of the total construction cost. Preparer: Craig S. Bryant Attachments: Ycs Title: Director of Utilities #000~1.03 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 2 of ~ This project includes 960 L.F. of 8" and 966 L.F. of 2' water lines. Staff has reviewed the bids and recommends award to the lowest bidder Perkinson Construction, LLC. Staff requests that the Board appropriate the necessary funds, accept a 50% contribution from DEQ and award the construction contract. District: Bermuda 000'104 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 3 of 3 Meeting Date: July 27, 2005 Budget and Management Comments: This item requests that the Board approve a construction contract in the amount of $52,668 to Perkinson Construction, LLC to construct a public water line at 5911 Nena Grove Lane. The Board is requested to authorize the acceptance and appropriation of a contribution from the Department of Environmental Quality of 50% of the contract amount or $26,334. The Board is also requested to authorize the transfer and appropriation of $30,000 from the water fund balance to cover the remainder of the contract amount and any unforeseen additional expenses. Sufficient funds are available in the water fund to transfer to the project. Preparer: Rebecca T. Dickson Title: Director, Budget and Management 000~05 VICINITY SKETCH 5911 Carver Heights Dr.- WfL County Project # 94-012 7 ~ Proposed 8" .Waterline II c~. Proj. # 94 0127 ..______.x ii~lii-~-i~--ll · · · ~ · · ~i GHTS Proposed 2" Water Service Line To Curd Co. Proj. # 94-0127 // z / Z 12601 rrl r"' 5911 5913 W S I llcl eq4al~ 333~33 ~et 000106 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page I of 2 Meetin~l Date: July 27, 2005 Item Number: 8.D.7.a. Subiect: Lease of Property for the Office of the Chesterfield/Colonial Heights Adult Drug Court County Administrator's Comments: ~_~~//~J /~/~4-~4/ County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Approve a lease with Daniel's Rental, for 5782 square feet of office space at 11745 Chester Road, for the Office of the Chesterfield/Colonial Heights Adult Drug Court and authorize the County Administrator to execute the lease agreement. Summary of Information: Staff has negotiated a six-month Lease, with an option for an additional four years, for office space beginning August 1, 2005 with the following monthly rents: August 1, 2005 - January 31, 2006 $4,000.00 Optional years February 1, 2006 - January 31, 2010 $4,000.00 Funds for the current year are in the operating budget. Future years rent payments are subject to grant funding for the program and annual appropriation by the Board. District: Bermuda Preparer: John W. Harmon Attachments: Ycs No Title: Ri.qht of Way Mana,qer 000~.08 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 2 of 2 Meeting Date: July 27, 2005 Budget and Management Comments: The Drug Court is requesting that the Board approve a lease and the County Administrator be authorized to execute the lease agreement. The additional leased office space will be used for Drug Court staff hired as a result of a new Adult Drug Court grant from the federal government. Funds are available and have been budgeted in the Drug Court's FY06 budget. Payment of rent in future years is subject to grant funding per the lease agreement. Preparer: Rebecca T. Dickson Title: Director, Budget and Manaqement 000'~09 VICINITY SKETCH LE. ISE OF PROPERTY FOR THE OFFI(~ OF THE CHESTERFIEL D/COL O?~LL4L HEIGHTS AD UL T DR UG C70 UR T 11745 Chester Rd N Chesterfield Coun~ Department of Utilities 1 la¢i eq~al~ 156.~'/' eat 000~1,10 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page I of Z Meeting Date: July 27, 2005 Item Number: 8.D.7.b. Subject: County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Renewal of Lease of Property for the Office of Social Services Board Action Requested: Approve a lease with CS Development Company, Inc., for 3304 square feet of office space at 9854 Lori Road, for the Department of Social Services and authorize the County Administrator to execute the lease agreement. Summary of Information: Staff has negotiated a three-year renewal, of its existing lease for office space beginning September 1, 2005 with an option for an additional two years, with the following monthly rents: September 1, 2005 - August 31, 2006 September 1, 2006 - August 31, 2007 September 1, 2007 - August 31, 2008 $4,405.33 $4,537.49 $4,673.61 Optional years September 1, 2008 - August 31, 2009 September 1, 2009 - August 31, 2010 $4,813.82 $4,958.23 Funds for the current year are in the operating budget. Future years rent payments are subject to annual appropriation by the Board. District: Dale Preparer: John W. Harmon Title: Right of Way Manager Attachments: Yes ~-~No #o00ili CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 2 of 2 Meeting Date: July 27, 2005 Budqet and Mana.qement Comments: This item requests that the Board approve a three-year renewal of an existing lease for office space for the Department of Social Services with an option for an additional two years. The first year's rent, beginning September 1, 2005, will be $52,863.96($4,405.33 monthly) and sufficient funding is included in the FY2006 operating budget to cover the expense. Future years rent payments will be included in proposed budget submissions to the Board and subject to annual appropriation. Preparer: Rebecca T, Dickson Title: Director, Budget and Management 000~.~.2 VICINITY SKETCH Renewal of Lease of Property for the Office of Social Services 9854 Lod Rd CT RD DR N Chesterfield County Department of Utilities 1 Iici eqlal~ 333,33 000~'13 THE HI~ ~oMP~IE~ III III I. ~ ~ I COURT SQUARE OgRCE COMPLEX [ ~ [ ~ ~ ~ [ S l ---,--~IP[A~S[NI'~IO~ 000:1. .4 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page I of I Meetin~l Date: July 27, 2005 Item Number: 8.D.8.a. Subiect: Request Permission for a Proposed Shed to Encroach Within a Portion of a Sixteen-Foot Sewer Easement Across Lot 10, Chester Grove, Section A County Administrator's Comments= //~LO-Y;4~-~ J //~~ County Administrator: BoardActionRequested: Grant Anthony Clark, Sr., permission for a proposed shed to encroach within a portion of a 16' sewer easement across Lot 10, Chester Grove, Section A, subject to the execution of a license agreement. Summary of Information: Anthony Clark, Sr., has requested permission for a proposed shed to encroach within a portion of a 16' sewer easement across Lot 10, Chester Grove, Section A. This request has been reviewed by staff and approval is recommended. District: Bermuda Preparer: John W. Harmon Title: Right of Way Manager Attachments: Yes No #000 . 5 VICINITY SKETCH REQUEST PERMISSION FOR A PROPOSED SHED TO ENCROACH WITHIN A PORTION OF A SIXTEEN POOT SEWER EASEMENT ACROSS LOT 10 CHESTER GROVE SECTION A iTS DR PINEY RIDGE C Chesterfield County Department of Utilities 1 I~ci eq~al~ ~B/eet 000~-6 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of I Meetin~l Date: July 27, 2005 Item Number: 8.D.8.b. Subiect: Request Permission for a Proposed Fence to Encroach Within a Sixteen-Foot Drainage Easement Across Lot 40, Tanner Village, Section A at Charter Colony County Administrator's Comments: ~~~J ~//~o~( County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Grant Robert Alan Weinstein and Virginia Seidel Weinstein, permission for a proposed fence to encroach 4' into a 16' drainage easement across Lot 40, Tanner Village, Section A at Charter Colony, subject to the execution of a license agreement. Summary of Information: Robert Alan Weinstein and Virginia Seidel Weinstein, have requested permission for a proposed fence to encroach within a 16' drainage easement across Lot 40, Tanner Village, Section A at Charter Colony. This request has been reviewed and Environmental Engineering recommends approval of a 4' encroachment in the easement. District: Matoaca Preparer: John W. Harmon Title: Right of Way Manager Attachments: --]No VICINITY SKETCH REQUEST PERMISSION POR A PROPOSED PENCE TO ENCROACH WITHIN A 16' DRAINAGE EASEMENT ACROSS LOT 40 TANNER VILLAGE SECTION A AT CHARTER COLONY t ES PL Chesterfield Counb/Department of Utilities 1 lick eqlal~ 416~7 tat O00:L'IS XXX- LICENSED ARE,A~ \ E54 SILT I CONSTRUCTION .251"x Robert A. Weinstein Virginia Weinstein 1519 Camack Place DB. 6411 PG. 477 PIN: 725698325300000 LL]T 32 ,I SiLT FENCE 853 % \ r.7' / / LDT 4I PROPDSEJ~ [HPRDVEHENT$ 13N LOT 40 TANNER VILLAGE SECT!ON A at. CHARTER CDLI3NY ZONED FRONT=30' (DEVELOPER) REAR=~5° CnRHER ¢SACK" Tn BACtOmt5° CORNER (g/~'l< TO SIDE)=ED' REVISE]~ OCT. ~7, e004 CNEV HOUSE DN LDT~_ ~J CIVIL ENGINEERS, PLANNERS & LAND ~URVEYDRS 7309 ~VER GREEN :~ p.~ B~X 5t7 HECHAHICSV]LLE, :jDATE,~Y 3, ~004 SCALE~ l' ' 30' _ %lTOClhllb :~AVH 8'1=16703 O00119 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page I of I Meetin~l Date: Subiect: July 27, 2005 County Administrator's Comments: Item Number: 8.D.8.c. Request Permission for an Existing Fence to Encroach Within a Sixteen-Foot Drainage Easement Across Lot 35, Tanner Village, Section A at Charter Colony County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Grant Michael J. Cranston and Faith A. Cranston, permission for an existing fence to encroach 3' into a 16' drainage easement across Lot 35, Tanner Village, Section A at Charter Colony, subject to the execution of a license agreement. Summary of Information: Michael J. Cranston and Faith A. Cranston, have requested permission for an existing fence to encroach within a 16' drainage easement across Lot 35, Tanner Village, Section A at Charter Colony. This request has been reviewed and Environmental Engineering recommends approval of a 3' encroachment in the easement. District: Matoaca Preparer: John W. Harmon Title: Ri.qht of Way Manaqer Attachments: Yes J--]No 000~.;~0 VICINITY SKETCH REQUEST PERMISSION FOR AN EXISTING FENCE TO ENCROACH WITHIN A 16' DRAINAGE EASEMENT ACROSS LOT 35 TANNER VILLAGE SECTION A AT CHARTER COLONY T %\ ,ES PL Chesterfield County' Department of Utilities 1 Ikc:k eqlal; ~,16~? l~et XXX- LICENSED F- ~icha~l J, Cranston Faith A. Cranston 1506 Jeffries Way DB. 5999 PG. 375 PIN: 725698386900000 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page I of I Meetin~l Date: July 27, 2005 Item Number: 8.D.8.d. Subiect: Request Permission for an Existing Fence to Encroach Within a Sixteen-Foot Drainage Easement Across Lot 32, Tanner Village, Section A at Charter Colony County Administrator's Comments= ,/"~~ County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Grant Garrett W. Noegel and Erin S. Noegel, permission for an existing fence to encroach 4' into a 16' drainage easement across Lot 32, Tanner Village, Section A at Charter Colony, subject to the execution of a license agreement. Summary of Information: Garrett W. Noegel and Erin S. Noegel, have requested permission for an existing fence to encroach within a 16' drainage easement across Lot 32, Tanner Village, Section A at Charter Colony. This request has been reviewed and Environmental Engineering recommends approval of a 4' encroachment in the easement. District: Matoaca Preparer: John W. Harmon Title: Right of Way Manaqer Attachments: '-] No #000123 VICINITY SKETCH REQUEST PERMISSION FOR AN EXISTING FENCE TO ENCROACH wrrHIN A 16' DRAINAGE EASEMENT ACROSS LOT 32 TANNER VILLAGE SECTION A AT CHARTER COLONY T ~,ES PL Chesterfield County Department of Utilities 1 lick 000~.24 XXX LICENSED AREA ! Or/adp I17 GARRETT W. NOEGEL " , ERIN S. NOEGEL e, t t t 1524 JEFFRIES WAY DB. 5838 PG. 604 ~ PIN: 725698465100000 000~.25 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page I of I Meetin~l Date: July 27, 2005 Item Number: 8.D.8.e. Subiect: Request Permission to Install a Private Sewer Service Within a Private Easement to Serve Property at 10310 Memory Lane County Administrator's Comments= /~)~~ J /~~ County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Grant PBR Enterprises LLC, permission to install a private sewer service within a private easement and authorize the County Administrator to execute the sewer connection agreement. Summary of Information: PBR Enterprises LLC, has requested permission to install a private sewer service within a private easement to serve property at 10310 Memory Lane. This request has been reviewed by staff and approval is recommended. District: Bermuda Preparer: John W. Harmon Title: Right of Way Manager Attachments: Ycs No #000126 VICINITY SKETCH REQUEST PERMISSION TO INSTALL A PRIVATE SEWER SERVICE WITHIN A PRIVATE EASEMENT TO SERVE PROPERTY A T 10310 MEMORY LANE RD C 1. EVERGREEN ARBOR PL 2. PINTAIL LANDING PL 3. AUTUMN LANDING CT 4. BENTTREE PL 5. BEL ARBOR DR 6. MAPLE LAN DING PL 7. ARBOR TER Chesterfield County Department of Utilities 1 Iml eq~al~ ~nl~et O00ig? N/F. PAUL RIDEOUT , GPIN 773-660-9985 I I .... DB.2170 PG.57 N 366069 .71 I 10310 MEMORY LANE ~ E' 117741~3 38 ZONED 0-2: .~--~'--, ._~' . · _N7o' 1.~'54,"E.. 204.11 \.~.\ \ ~ I · 16' SEWER ~ / ~ N 3660'671.90 ~SEMENT ~ E 1177~163.31 44.14~ SHIRL~ L. HENNESS~ 'GPIN: 774-660-0957 DB.3287 PG.156 ~o c 10320 MEMORY ~NE ~ ~ .... " ~'. .... i : · , 2 ,~ ,R=522.40' /.L~55~31' ~; ~ . ............ ........ 153.32' ~ ~ .... "' ' '"" ST RTE N0.929 60' R/W PLAT SHOWING A (PRIVATE) 16' SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT, ACROSS THE PROPERTY OF THE SHIRLEY L. HENNESSEY 'BERMUDA DISTRICT CHESTERFIELD'COUNTY, VIRGINIA JN: A05-101 ~KF. VIN L. I~LOYD, P.E., SCALE 1' = 60' / I ~o,~',~o J \ · P.O. J~OX 1!78 DATE 02/t8/05 Ch, esterf~,egd. V~,?'gi~ic~ 23832 R~: 06/14/05 COUN~ PROJ. NO. 05-00~5 P~o=e · (804) 778-4518 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page I of I Meetin~l Date: July 27, 2005 Item Number: 8.D.8.f. Subject: Request Permission for a Proposed Fence to Encroach Within a Sixteen-Foot Drainage Easement Across Lot 49, Mallory Village Section A at Charter Colony County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: BoardAction Requested: Grant Gregory T. Snidow and Karen J. Snidow, permission for a proposed fence to encroach within a 16' drainage easement across Lot 49, Mallory village Section A at Charter Colony, subject to the execution of a license agreement. Summary of Information: Gregory T. Snidow and Karen J. Snidow, have requested permission for a proposed fence to encroach within a 16' drainage easement across Lot 49, Mallory Village Section A at Charter Colony. This request has been reviewed by staff and approval is recommended. District: Matoaca Preparer: John W. Harmon Title: Ri.qht of Way Mana.qer Attachments: Yes ---] No #0001;~9 VICINITY SKETCH REQUEST PERMISSION POR A PROPOSED PENCE TO ENCROACH WITHIN A 16' DRAINAGE EASEMENT ACROSS LOT 49, MALLORY VILLAGE SECTION A AT CHARTER COLONY AGEE TER AG1 Z I- O2` ;iR Chesterfield County Department of Utilities O0O3.8O ×- LICENSED AREA GREGORY T. SNIDOW KAREN J. SNIDOW 1441 LUNDY TERRACE DB. 6473 PG. 163 PIN: 7236995383 1..o[ 50 Lo~ 45 I.;.." ;E, qi':llT!P~ APE ~ TO DI,'~LLII,~. , ...IMPROVEMENTS ON LOT 49, SECTION A "MALLORY VILLAGE" MATOACA DISTRICT CHESTERFIELD CO., VA. DATE: June 22, 2005 8CAl..E: 1' = 30" l oseph, Cox & Associates, Ix c. 1005 Hu~uend. Road, Suite 30a. Richmond. VA 23235 (804) 8g?-~87 Fa (~04) ~'i'..~ CIV:L ENGINEERING LAND SURVEYING LAND PLANNING · ;i"L.~,'T"~':'~: ;'~': :. "~,.~r,~OO~/ & Karon 81'J__'~-- [ JOB NO.:, 252~1 , CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page I of I Meetin~l Date: July 27, 2005 Item Number: 8.D.8.g. Subiect: Request Permission for a Proposed Fence to Encroach Within a Sixteen-Foot Drainage Easement Across Lot 52, Mallory Village, Section A at Charter Colony County Administrator's Comments= //~~ ~ County Administrator: BoardAction Requested: Grant Mark J. Sowers and Kimberly H. Sowers, permission for a fence to encroach within a 16' drainage easement across Lot 52, Mallory Village, Section A at Charter Colony, subject to the execution of a license agreement. Summary of Information: Mark J. Sowers and Kimberly H. Sowers, have requested permission for a fence to encroach within a 16' drainage easement across Lot 52, Mallory Village, Section A at Charter Colony. This request has been reviewed by staff and approval is recommended. District: Matoaca Preparer: John W. Harmon Title: Ri.qht of Way Mana.qer Attachments: Ycs --]No 000~.32 VICINITY SKETCH REQUEST PERMISSION FOR A PROPOSED PENCE TO ENCROACH WITHIN A 16' DRAINAGE EASEMENT ACROSS LOT 52 MALLORY VILLAGE SECTION A AT CHARTER COLONY AGEE TER :iR Z N Chesterfield Coun~ Department of Utilities I b¢i eqlal~ ;,16~T 000133 XXX - LICENSED AREA ~.66' · a7o PRDP[I$~ ]HPRL1VET~N: 270 CO~TItUCTIOIq ENT~ \ \ Liar' 4~ Mark J. Sowers Kimberly H. Sowers 14779 Rolling Spring Drive DB. 6382 PG. 313 PIN: 723699688500000 260 , % /.aT SILT APPROVED P.13. I~X SI7 HECHAN~CSVILL.E:, V'%, $ECTRW A ....... at ,CH4RTER ICDL~Y ,,Tr.,acT. ~; ~o~ sclc., l' . 3o rOACA DZSTRICT CHE~TERIIr1'G"LD COUNTY. VZRI~£NI~A ~ ----~ ,C~'~$~-[~ ' ' I Irllt ......... NO, 16.774-- P0'30:=76 ' ' ' 000134 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page I of I Meetin~l Date: July 27, 2005 Item Number: 8.D.8.h. Subject: Request Permission for a Proposed Sign to Encroach Within a Sixteen-Foot Water Easement Across the Property of First States Investors 3099, LLC at 13710 Midlothian Turnpike County Administrator: BoardAction Requested: Grant First States Investors 3099, LLC, permission for a proposed sign to encroach within a 16' water easement across its property at 13710 Midlothian Turnpike, subject to the execution of a license agreement. Summary of Information: First States Investors 3099, LLC, has requested permission for a proposed sign to encroach within a 16' water easement across its property at 13710 Midtothian Turnpike. This request has been reviewed by staff and approval is recommended. District: Midlothian Preparer: John W. Harmon Title: Right of Way Manager Attachments: Ycs --] No ~00~35 VICINITY SKETCH REQUEST PER. MISSION FOR .4 PROPOSED SICrN TO EN(TRO.4CH WITHIN.4 S.L~,.'TEEN FOOT tE4 TER E,4SE~$1ENT.4CROSS THE PROPERT~ OF FIRST ST.4TES ~?ESTORS 309~ LLC,4T 1~Y10 ~DLOTHL4N TURNPIKE RD L~ D~ Or [] SQ Q 0 LN ~ 000~.36 Chesterfield County Department of Utilities 1 lick eq~a~ ~B/eet / / '// 0005.37 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page I of I Meetin~l Date: July 27, 2005 Item Number: 8.D.8,[. Subiect: Request Permission for a Sign to Encroach Within a Fifteen-Foot Water Easement Across Property of Chester Medical Office Center Association County Administrator's Comments: /~_~.~~ A~ County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Grant Chester Medical Office Center Association permission for a sign to encroach within a 15-foot water easement across its property, subject to the execution of a license agreement. Summary of Information: Chester Medical Office Center Association has requested permission to move its existing sign into a 15' water easement across its property as shown on the attached sketch. This request has been reviewed by staff and approval is recommended. District: Bermuda Preparer: John W. Harmon Title: Right of Way Manager Attachments: Ycs No #000:1.35 VICINITY SKETCH REQUEST PE~'fflSSION FOR A ,~TGN TO ENCR OA CH I~ITHIN ,4 FIFI"EEN FOOT I~E4 TER E.4SEMEN'T ,4 CR 05~$' PR OPER TY OF CHESTER MEDIC.4L OFFICE C~NTER A,$',$'OCL4 TION 1. GRAND OAKS FOREST CIR 2. GRAND OAKS FOREST CT 7 · GRAND OAKS FOREST DR · GRAND OAKS FOREST ClR · CHESTER SQUARE RD · CHESTER SQUARE AVE N Chesterfield County Department of Utilities 1 b¢i eq~al~ ~]B/eet 000:1.39 4-5-0~ Revised 5-27-05 Medical Cem~r Ealranc~ Visibility Study 000:1.40 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page I of I Meetin~l Date: July 27, 2005 Item Number: 8.D.q. Subject: County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Request to Quitclaim a Portion of a Sixteen-Foot Water Easement and a Sixteen-Foot Drainage Easement (Public) Across Property of Wal- Mart Real Estate Business Trust Board Action Requested: Authorize the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors and the County Administrator to execute a quitclaim deed to vacate a portion of a 16' water easement and a 16' drainage easement (public) across the property of Wal-Mart Real Estate Business Trust. Summary of Information: Wal-Mart Real Estate Business Trust has requested the quitclaim of a portion of a 16' water easement and 16' drainage easement (public) across its property as shown on the attached plats. Staff has reviewed the request and approval is recommended. District: Clover Hill Preparer: John W. Harmon Title: Right of Way Manager Attachments: Ycs No 000~.4~. VICINITY SKETCH REQUEST TO QUITCLAIM A PORTION OF A 16' WATER EASEMENT AND A 16' DRAINAGE EASEMENT (PUBLIC) ACROSS THE PROPERTY OF WAL-MART REAL ESTATE BUSINESS TRUST N $ Chesterfield County Department of Utilities 000~.42 O0O148 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page I of I Meetin~l Date: July 27, 2005 Item Number: 8.D.10.a. Subiect: Acceptance of a Parcel of Land Adjacent to the North Right of Way Line of Cogbill Road from H. Wayne Hamlett and Teresa J. Hamlett County Administrator's Comments: //~__~.&. J County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Accept the conveyance of a parcel of land containing 0.012 acres adjacent to the north right of way line of Cogbill Road from H. Wayne Hamlett and Teresa J. Hamlett, and authorize the County Administrator to execute the deed. Summary of Information: Staff requests that the Board of Supervisors accept the conveyance of a parcel of land containing 0.012 acres adjacent to the north right of way line of Cogbill Road (State Route 638). This dedication is for Cogbill Road Shoulder Widening. Approval is recommended. District: Dale Preparer: John W. Harmon Title: Ri,qht of Way Manaqer Attachments: Ycs ---]No #000~44 VICINITY SKETCH ACCEPTANCE OP A PARCEL OP LAND ADJACENT TO THE NORTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF COGBILL ROAD FROM H WAYNE HAMLETT & TERESA J HAMLETT RD W ROCK SPRING STEi 000~.45 Chesterfield County' Department of Utilities Ibct eq~al~ 666.67 THIS PARCEL OF LAND WAS TRANSFERED TO HERBERT W. HAMLETT AND ~ERESA J. HAMLETT FROM JOHN K. AND NITA T. ,JACKSON IN DB.1675 ,,A P0.3371 BUT HAD PREVIOUSLY BEEN TRANSFERED ~. (~ % BY THE JACKSONS TO THE HAMLETTS IN DB.16533 ~ -(3 _,_ AREA TAKE. fOR rOOT "OW ., %-~'~'~_ ~ BY DB 21330 PO. 1844 FROM ~" ... 0~ -- JOHN K. ;JACKSON AND NITA S57'57'.0.6"W ~ · ,~ m. JACKSON AS RECORDED 4 7 45 \ 4~-0 '1' JAN. 1991. JOHN K. JACKSON ' X O(~ ~.. C) AND NITA T. JACKSON SOLD L2 \ ~'~' THIS PROPERTY TO H. ,,,=-0",~,"~"," ~ ~.~O O-''~-~''O J WAYNE HAMLETT AND r~aw_/_o.,~,o r.. ~ . ~..3~3:~O) TERESA J HAMLETT BY D B 1 9,.5 ~ ~ ~ · ' · ' ~ I RECORDED .3 MAY 1984. THIS ~ u ~v~,~ U~M~L-'~- \ IS A 0.012 ACRE PARCEL. ~ ri. vv~H~= n~m~.~l ~ ~ & TERESA 3, HAHL~ ~ D.B. 1653 PG. 1875 ~ ~ 5[[8 COGB[LL ROAD ~ --. T~ ED NO,: 776683776400000 X ~ ~16' DRAINAGE ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ EASEMENT ~ / . ~ TE~PO~RY CONSTRUe[ON ~ X ~~&~. t~.~ ~ ~EMENT ~~~R~_ .... MARY H. · 1-26-05 ~ ~ PERMANENT VDOT SLOPE~0 ~U~~O E 11776767.40 AND D~NA6E ~SENENT (2,350 Sq. ~.) ~v]seD: ~ES~UA~V ZZ, ZOOS P~T SHOWING A VAE~B~ WIDTH TENPO~RY 20 0 lO 20 40 CONSTEU~ON EASENENT AND A VAEIABLE WIDTH PERNANENT VDOT SLOPE AND ~.~c s~ z"=~o' D~INAGE ~SENENT ACEOSS THE PEOPEE~ NOTE: OF mis PLAT WAS PREPARED ~THOUT ~E H. WAYNE HAMLE~ & BENEFIT OF A TI~E BINDER. THEREFORE A~ ~X,ST~N~ ~*S~,TS a*~ ,OT a~ TERESA 3. HAMLE~ SHO~. ~E6[N~ I No~m~ I W~6[N~ DALE DI~ Cheste~eld Count, Va ~S D~W[NG P~D AT ~ B~CHWAYOFRCE Y~R~]ON~Z~O~, DATE:JAN, 26, 2005 S~LE: 21~ ~Ddve I ~,V4232~ SHE~ 1 OF i 3.N.: 21229 TEL ~.419.1~20 F~ ~.~.2~5 ~.U~ons.com Site Dewlopmlnt I RilldenUil I Znfrml~u~u~ ~ Technology D~WN BY: H.S.F. CHECK BY: P.N.H. II ONS GROUP 00014{; CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page I of I Meetin~l Date: July 27, 2005 Item Number: 8.D.10.b. Subiect: Acceptance of a Parcel of Land Extending East from Springford Parkway from Westbridge Development, Incorporated County Administrator's Comments: j/~~/.~.~/ County Administrator: BoardAction Requested: Accept the conveyance of a parcel of land containing 3.25 acres extending east from Springford Parkway (State Route 659) from Westbridge Development, Inc., and authorize the County Administrator to execute the deed. Summary of Information: It is the policy of the county to acquire right of way whenever possible through development to meet the ultimate road width as shown on the County Thoroughfare Plan. The dedication of this parcel conforms to that plan, and will decrease the right of way costs for road improvements when constructed. District: Matoaca Preparer: John W. Harmon Title: Riqht of Way Manager Attachments: #000147 VICINITY SKETCH ,4 CC'EPTANCE OF.4 P4R (_'EL O_F L.4 ND E.¥TENDING EAST FRO21 SPREe: GFORD P.4RIi I'1.41 FR 05I t ¢']E,$'TB RID GE DE I'~EL OPMEN T I~rC N s Chesterfield County Department of Utilities 000'148 000~-69 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page I of 2 Meetin~l Date: July/27, 2005 Item Number: 8.D.l~a. Subiect: Transfer of $2,040 in Midlothian District Improvement Funds to the Police and Parks and Recreation Departments and to the School Board to Defray the Costs of the Midlothian Village Day Festival County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: The Board of Supervisors is requested to transfer $2,040 in Midlothian District Improvement Funds to the Police and Parks and Recreation Departments and to the School Board to rent space and equipment and to provide services for the Midlothian Village Day Festival. Summary of Information: Supervisor Barber has requested the Board to transfer $2,040 in Midlothian District Improvement Funds to pay a portion of the costs incurred by the County to supply equipment, police, parks and recreation services, and school space for the Midlothian Village Day Festival. The Festival is a long- standing event that is co-sponsored by the County pursuant to a written agreement and is open to the general public. The Police and Parks and Recreation Departments and the School Board have traditionally given assistance to the Festival and the requested funds will help defray the costs incurred by these departments to rent equipment and space and provide services and facilities, which the departments previously planned to provide. Of the $2,040, $250 of the amount will be transferred to the Police Department to provide uniformed officers; $1,365 will be transferred to Parks and Recreation to rent tables, chairs, a stage platform and other equipment, Preparer: Rebecca T. Dickson Title: Director Budqet and Manaqement 0425:694?6. ! Attachments: Ycs -]No 9 00150 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 2 of 2 and to publicize the event as well as cover the expense of a U-Haul trailer to transport the items to the festival site; and $425 will be transferred to the School Board for the cost of renting Midlothian Middle School and providing custodial services. This request originally came from the Midlothian Junior Women's Club. The County is legally prohibited from donating money to this organization. The Board is authorized, however, to defray the cost incurred by County departments and the School Board for civic events which the County has traditionally sponsored pursuant to a co- sponsorship agreement and which are open to the general public and serve a community-wide audience. For information regarding available balances in the District Improvement Fund accounts, please reference the District Improvement Fund Report. 000151 ~:0 'd J'UN-21-2BI35 11:84 CHESTERFIELD Co. DISTRICT I1~ A ~£ :~ S00C-80-9~£ 804 ?IY 6~Y M.~ix~.~ Post-it' Fax Note 7671, This application must be compl .......... u ........ , ~ ~,~ ~,uunty cart consider a request for funding with Distrk;t Improvement Funds. Completing and signing this form does not mean that you will receive funding or that the County can legally consider your request. Virginia law places substantial restrictions on the authority of the County to give public funds, such as District Improvement Funds, to private persons or organizations and these restriotions may preclude the County's Board of Supervisors from even considering your request. What is the name of the applicant {person or organization) making this funding request? /qi lcrkh' cu't Z, n,or, If an organization is the applicant, what is 'the nature and purpose of the organization? (Also attach organization's most recent articles of incorporation and/or bylaws to application.). _ What is the amount of funding you are seeking? J Aoqo.oo Describe in detail the 'funding request and how the money, if approved, will be spent. Is any County Department involved in 't~e project, event or program for which you are seeking funds? If this request for funding will not fully fund you. r activity or program, what other individuals or organizations will provide the remainder of the funding? 0407;23380.1 000152 £0'd X96 ~£:~I JUN-2~-2005 11:04 CHESTERFIELD Co, 804 ?17 6297 Pege 2 tf applicant is an organization, answer the following: Is the organization a corporation? Is the organization non-profit? Is the organization tax-exempt? Yes v// No Yes No -- Yes No o What is the address of the applicant making this funding request? What is the teJephone number, fax number, e-mail address of the applicant? Signature of applicant, If you are signing on behalf of an organization you must be the president, vice-president, ohairman/director or vice-chairman of the organization. Title [if signing on behalf of an orga.izatio.) Printed Ndrne ' 0407:233 f~O. 1 000153 TOTRL"~.~2 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page I of 2 Meetin~l Date: Jul}/27, 2005 Item Number: 8.D.11,.b. Subiect: Donate a Total of $6,000 (Bermuda - $3,000, Matoaca - $3,000) from the District Improvement Fund to The Shepherd's Center of Chesterfield County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: The Board of Supervisors is requested to donate a total of $6,000 (Bermuda - $3,000, Matoaca - $3,000) from the District Improvement Fund to The Shepherd's Center of Chesterfield. Summary of Information: The Shepherd's Center of Chesterfield ("Center") is a non-profit corporation which provides a variety of services to the elderly including recreational and daycare programs that promote independent functioning for the elderly and help to delay the need for more restrictive and costly long-term care for elderly citizens. The County provides additional funding to the Center through the County's Community Contracts program. For FY2006, the Board authorized funding in the amount of $9,000. In the past, the County had no legal authority to give funds directly to the Center since it was not a qualifying organization under §15.2-953 of the Virqinia Code. The 2004 General Assembly amended §15.2-953 to add organizations, like the Shepherd's Center, who provide recreational and daycare services to persons over 65, to the list of organizations to which Preparer: Rebecca T. Dickson Title: Director of Budqet 0425:69474.1 Attachments: Yes ~] No # 000'154 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 2 of 2 the Board can donate public funds. Accordingly, the Board is legally authorized to make this donation. In addition, even though the Center does have an affiliation with religious organizations and maintains its office in a church, the County cannot, under federal law, treat the Center differently from other non-profit organizations, such as the Senior Center of Richmond, which provide services to the elderly. The donated money will be used by the Center to service the increasing elderly population of the County. For information regarding available balances in the District Improvement Fund accounts, please reference the District Improvement Fund Report. 000:1.55 Jun ~u ,uq u~:lup DISTRICT IMPROVEMENT FUNDS APPLICATION This application must be completed and signed before the County can consider a request for funding with District Improvement Funds. Completing and signing this form does not mean that you will receive funding or that the County can legally consider your request. Virginia law places substantial restrictions on the authority of the County to give public funds, such as District Improvement Funds, to private persons or organizations amd these restrictions may preclude the County's Board of Supervisors from even considering your request. What is the name of the applicant (person or organization) making this funding request? If an organization is the applicant, what is the nature and purpose of the organization? {Aisc attach organization's most recent articles of incorporation and/or bylaws to ~_.~._ , , application.) , ~ . ~:~e__ What is the amount of funding you are seeking.? ¢¢/¢ j 000, Describe in detail the funding request and the money, if approved, will be spent. Is any County Department involved in the project, event or program for which you are seeking funds? If this request for funding will not fully fund your activity or program, wha~ other individuals or organizations will provide the remainder of the funding? 040'7:23380. I 000156 ~UN-30-2005 15:07 96X P.02 Page 2 If applicant is an organization, answer the following: Is the organization a corporation? Js the organization non-profit? Is the organization tax-exempt? Yes w'"' No Yes ~/ No Yes ¢ No What is the address of the applicant making this funding request? What is the telephone number, fax number. e-mail address of the applicant? gt 4 ---zO / I Signature of applicant. If you are signing on ~easq ~dZeant ire' n~r~m amn ,u~ itr e~;o Title (if signing on behalf of an organization) Printed Name 0407:23380. I 000 .5'7 3UN-30-2005 ~5:07 97Z P.03 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page I of I Meetin~l Date: July 27, 2005 Subject: Donate $1500 ($7500 Total) From Each District Henricus Foundation for Henricus Publick Days County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Item Number: 8.D.1~c. Improvement Fund to the Board Action Requested: The Board is requested to donate $1500 ($7500 total) from each of the Districts from their District Improvement Funds to the Henricus Foundation to offset the cost of providing a shuttle service for Henricus Publick Days. Summary of Information: The Supervisors have requested the Board to donate $1500 ($7500 total) from each of the District Improvement Funds to the Henricus Foundation to offset the cost of providing shuttle services for citizens attending Henricus Publick Days. Henricus Publick Days promote educational programs relating to the history and preservation of Henricus Park. The Henricus Foundation is a non-profit, tax-exempt organization dedicated to the preservation and history of Henricus Park. The Board is authorized under Va. Code §15.2-953B to'make donations to non-profit organizations which are formed to commemorate historic events and can, therefore, legally donate funds to the Foundation. For information regarding available balances in the District Improvement Fund accounts, please reference the District Improvement Fund Report. Preparer: Rebecca T. Dickson Title: Director, Budqet & Manaqement 0425:69475.1 Attachments: Yes ~ No # 000:1.58 RPR-1~4-2t~5; 13:2~ CHESTERFIELD Co. DISTRICT IMPROVEMENT FUNDS APPLICATION '717 629? P.02 This application must be completed and signed before the County can consider a request for funding with District Improvement Funds. Completing and signing this form does not mean that you will receive funding or that the County can legally consider your request. Virginia law places substantial restrictions on the authority of the Cotmt¥ to give public funds, such as District Improvemem Funds, to private persons or organizations and lheee restrictions may preclude the County's Board of Supervisors from even ©onsideHng your request. What is the name of the applicant (person or organization) making this funding request? If an organizalion is the applicant, what is the nature and purpose of the organization? (Also attach organization's most recent articles of incorporation and/or byJews to application.) What is the amount of funding you are seeking? Describe in detail the funding request and · how the money, if approved, will be spent. 7, 5oq.__ Is any County Department involved in the project, event or program for which you are seeking funds? If this request for funding will not fu/ly fund your activity or program, what other individuals or organizations witl provide the remainder of the funding? 0407:2.1~$0. ! 000159 i-r. · i~-I~I-L:~ 13:23 CHEST£1~IELD Co. I~ 717 629? P.03 Page 2 if applicant is an organization, answer the following: is the organization a corporation? Is the organiz~rtion non-profit? Is the organization tax-exempt? Yes _. ~, No Yes / No Yes :/ No What is the address of the applicant making this funding request? What is the telephone number, fax number, e-mail address of the applicant? Signature of applir, anl. If you are signing on behalf of an organization you must be the president, vice-president, chairman/director or S~g~ Title (if signing on behslf of an organization) Printed Name Date 0407:2t.180,1 TOTRL P. 03 000160 The Henricus Foundation is requesting $7,500 in District Improv~ Funds to help underwrite the almost $16,000 in expenses related to Publick Day. This support would also provide Henrieus with the ability to ~gni6eantly increase promotion and site activity resulting in enhanced attendance and admission revenue. Funding for entertainment and demonstrators will ensure a quality Publick Day which is Henricus' largest and most popular anm~__a! event. The date ofthe event (September 17~ will also serve as the first of two Chesterfield County Days where all residents of Oaestex~ld will be admitted free of charge. Based on past attendance, nearly 2000 County residents are anticipated. This represents nearly $8,000 in revenue which the Foundation would not receive. Total expenses are $15,700. The $7,500 support we are requesting l~om the County would provide nearly half of the total funds required and would not only offset the loss in potential revenue but enable the Foundation to significantly promote a major event, enhancing the image of Chesterfield County within the Riehmo~ nd region as it indicates the quality of events and programs that are offered in the County. 000161 HENRICUS FOUNDATION PUBLICK DAY 2005 BUDGET District Improvement Funds Promotion/Advertising inc. banners Entertainment Puppeteers 2 musical groups (@ $300 each) Indian dancers and musicians Indian storyteller African-american storyteller Demonstrators Blacksmith 2 woodworkers Potter Basketmaker Trading company Spinners/weavers Buses ( total of 4) Total, District Improvement Funds HenHcus Foundation Staffing ( 12 people x 30 hours x $10/hr) Craft supplies Site work and materials Promotion/Advertising Chesterfield police overtime Miscellaneous expenses Total, Henricus Foundation TOTAL PUBLICK DAY EXPENSES $3OO 6OO 750 3OO 3OO 250 500 250 250 250 250 $2,500 2,250 1,750 1,000 $7,500 $3,600 500 600 2,000 1,000 500 $8,200 $15,700 000162 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page I of 2 Meetin~l Date: July27, 2005 Item Number: 8.D.12. Subject: Approval of Allocation of $475,000 from the Utility Inducement Fund to Pay for Extending Existing Public Wastewater Lines to Accommodate Future Development of Meadowville Technology Park and Approve the Construction Contract for County Project Number 00-0166 to G. L. County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Howard, Incorpgrated Board Action Requested: Staff recommends that the Board approve a $475,000 allocation from the Utility Inducement Funds to design and install the wastewater lines to properties on the south side of Meadowville Road; waive the requirement that the economic development prospect post a performance bond to guarantee repayment to the County and the requirement that the County's share of the total cost does not exceed 75%; award a construction contract to G. L. Howard, Inc.; and authorize County Administrator to execute any necessary documents. Summary of Information: The County has adopted a Utility Inducement Program to fund the extension of water and wastewater lines for economic development projects by advancing funds for utility extensions to serve proposed projects. In furtherance of the Department of Economic Development's marketing strategies for the Meadowville Technology Park, and to prepare a site for two prospective tenants, it is necessary to move forward with these extensions in order to ensure that the properties are ready for development in early 2006. Specifically, this utility project includes 1,896 feet of 18", 1,225 feet of 21", and 1,319 feet of 27" wastewater lines. Our consultant, Timmons Group, has reviewed the bids and recommends awarding the project to the lowest bidder G.L. Howard, Inc. While there are no guarantees that the two prospects currently considering Preparer: James G. Dunn Attachments: Title: Director, Economic Development 0505:69588.1 Yes ~'~ No CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 2 of 2 .Meeting Date: July 27t 2005 the site will, agree to locate within the Park, their decision is contingent upon the County's ability to meet their construction schedules; therefore, we must proceed with this infrastructure project in order to meet their requirements. In addition, several recent high tech prospects have eliminated Meadowville Technology Park for further consideration due to concerns that the County would be unable to meet their construction schedules without utility and road upgrades already underway or completed; therefore, this action will significantly improve the opportunities to attract other users, even if the two with whom we are currently involved do not choose to locate at the Park. Since there are no guarantees that the prospects will actually locate within the Park, Staff requests that the Board waive its normal policy of requiring the prospect to post a performance bond guaranteeing that it will repay the County's advance of Utility Inducement Funds and its policy to limit the County's share of the construction cost to 75%. CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page I of 2 Meetin~l Date: Subiect: July 27, 2005 Item Number: 9. Claim of Viking Enterprise, Incorporated for $86,531.00 in Additional Compensation for the River's Bend Fire Station Construction Contract County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Staff recommends that the Board deny the claim of Viking Enterprise, Inc. Summary of Information: Viking Enterprise, Inc., has brought this claim for $86,531.00 in additional compensation related to its construction of the River's Bend Fire Station. A copy of Viking's claim is attached. In 2002, the County entered into a contract with Viking for the construction of the new River's Bend Fire Station, for the contract price of $2,058,000.00. This claim arises out of the inadequate performance of the concrete pour for the fire apparatus bay by Viking's subcontractor, Nordic Construction. Since the pour did not meet the contract specifications, causing the concrete to be unacceptable, the County required Viking to remove the deficient concrete and perform a second pour that conformed to contract specifications. Viking is now requesting payment for the second pour, even though the second pour was necessitated by the failure of Viking's subcontractor, for whom Viking is legally responsible. Preparer: Steven L. Micas Attachments: Yes ~ No Title: County Attorney 0505: 69452.3. #000~.63 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 2 of 2 During the first concrete pour, which was performed in late July of 2003, Viking's subcontractor did not have a sufficient work crew available to insure that the freshly poured concrete was protected against premature drying and the late summer temperatures, as required by the contract specifications. As a result, the cement did not harden or hydrate properly, which caused the poured concrete to be left with a rough, uneven surface full of whorls and ridges. Such a surface is inconsistent with the monolithic slab pour requirements of the contract specifications and is inappropriate for a fire station apparatus bay. In its correspondence with the County, Viking acknowledged the deficiency of the concrete as poured in late July, 2003, but requested that it be allowed to repair the deficient concrete rather than replace it. However, since the concrete had already hardened in its roughened condition, it could not be smoothed out appropriately and as a result, the project architect properly and in accordance with the contract, refused Viking's request to repair the improper concrete. Accordingly, Viking was contractually required to remove the concrete. A second pour was conducted by Viking's subcontractor in September, 2003. The second pour was performed in accordance with the contract specifications and resulted in a proper, smooth concrete finish. Since it was Viking's subcontractor's failure to comply with the contract specifications which caused the concrete to be deficient and to require its replacement, the County is not responsible for the cost of the second pour. Accordingly, staff recommends denial of Viking's claim. 0505:69452.1 000164 Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors P.O. Box 40 Chesterfield, Va. 23832 Attn: Mr. Edward Barber, Chairman RE: Rivers Bend Fire Station #18 901 Bermuda Hundred Road Invitation for Bid # 02-2138-8736 Dear Mr. Barber, On September 6, 2002, Viking Enterprise, Inc. entered into a contract with Chesterfield County for the construction of a new fire station facility as referenced above. During the course of construction, Viking installed a concrete slab in the apparatus bay which was subsequently rejected by the owner's representative and the later, the architect. Although Viking was not in agreement with this determination, the slab was removed and replaced and Viking submitted a claim for the costs incurred (PCO #30, copy enclosed). This claim was rejected by the owner's representative and the architect. The purpose of this letter is to inform you that Viking Enterprise, Inc. stands by its original claim, and as required by the State Code of Virginia, please allow this letter to serve as notification to the Board of such. The amount of the claim for replacing the slab in lieu of repairing, as allowed by project specification section 03300 paragraph 3.8 "Concrete Surface Repairs" is $86,531.00. Viking also reserves the right to claim interest having accrued since November 2003. I ask that you review this claim with the Board and respond to me at your earliest convenience. If you have any questions or comments or fred yourself in need of more information, please contact me at 23 !- 1155 extension 307. Thank you for your consideration. I look forward to your response. Sincerely, President Cc: christopher G. Hill - Meyer, Goergen & Marrs, P.C. OO0 IG5 110 GIANT DRIVE R!CH,~,IOND, VA 23224 COMMERCIAL CONTRACTORS SINCE 1968 804/231-1155 FAx 804/231 ~2414 110 Giant Drive Richmond, VA 23224 (804) 231-1155 Fax (804) 231-2414 www.viicin~~.com Hughes Group Architecls- John Spence Frmm Yancey Snavely (703) 834-1752 Paaem 21 (703) 437-6600 Date= October 30, 2003 River's Bend Fire Sta'don John, Attached you will find a copy of PCO #30 REVISED which deals with the additional costs incurred due to the removal of the apparatus bay slab. These costs include charges to repair/rework damaged conduit under the slab and to repair the floor drains. Damage to the conduit and drains occurred as the slab pieces were lifted out of the bay by the £orklifl, The revised cost for the replacement of the apparatus bay slab is $86,531.00. Please include this change on the next change order issued for this project. If any questions arise during your review of this information, please contact me at 231-1155. Thanks, Yancey Snavely 000166 iKiNG 110 Giant Drive Richmond, va. 23224 (804) 231-1155 Fax (804) 231-2414 POTENTIAL CHANGE ORDER To: Hughes Group Architects Attn: John Spence Project: River's Bend Fire Station #18 Re: Replace apparatus bay slab in lieu of surface repairs Material & Equipment Breakdown (includin¢~ taxes and fmic Date: October 30, 2003 PCO~ 30 REVISED Material subtotal Direct Labor Manhours Rate Cost 1 $0.00 2 $0.00 3 $0.00 4 $0.00 5 $0.00 Subtotal $0.00 Ins & Taxes ( 35%) $0.00 Total Testing and cleanup ( 7% of labor total) Tool Replacement ( 5% of labor total) Time Extension - days x $ / day 15% overhead on direct costs Subcontractors Nordic Construction $63,114.00 Hill Electrical $14,290.00 Statewide Plumbin~l $482.00 10% overhead on subcontractor(s) Subtotal Subcontractor total Total $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $77,886.00 $7,788.60 $65,674.60 $656.40 $66,531.00 000:1.6'7 october 16, 2003 To: Viking Enterprise, Inc. 110 GiantDrive Suite A Richmond, VA 23224 Ath%: Yancey Snavely Re: Riversbend Fire Station ~18 Your No. Our Proposal #: Gentlemen: 510'-10 Type: Forwarded herewith is our proposal to perform the following work: Lump Sum Price: Twelve Thousand Eight Hundred Sixty Three Dollars ($12,863.00) ~ New Quotation ~ Con~act Decrease Description: Multiple dates - extra work - September/October Repairing damaged under slab conduit Contract Increase Exceptions: This proposal will require 0 days extension to the contract, it is good for n/a days, and does not include any amounts for events beyond our control such as acceleration of work, delays, disruptions of schedule or impact costs. Work sheet attached: ~c Yes No Signature G. 0 ' Brien Project Manager Title Wkite: Original Yellow: File 0003.68 '~00'0.169 000170 0171 II I{ 000177 I 000175 September 29, 2003 To: Viking Enterprise, Inc. 110 Giant Drive Suite A Richmond, VA 23224 Attn: Yancey Snavely Re: Riversbend Fire Station ~18 Your No. Our Proposal #: Gentlemen: 510-9 Type: Forwarded herewith is our proposal to perform the following work: Lump Sum Fourteen Hundred Twenty Seven Dollasrs ($1,427.00) Price: New Quotation [21 Contract Decrease Kit Contract Increase Description: Multiple Dates' - Extra Work - September JOB -#._ ] COST Exceptions: This proposal will require 0 days extension to the contract, it is good for n/a days, and does not include any amounts for events beyond our control such as acceleration of work, delays, disruptions of schedule or impact costs. Work sheet attached: ~ Yes 121 No Project Manaqer Yellow: File White: Orizinm 000 .$0 DURATION ESTIMATE RECAP EST. NO. DUE DATE _ ADDENDA N~IHMEBVR ITEM QUOTED pR!r_-En -- MAi PHIAL _ / >-.~.~ ~,~_ /~//~ ~,~ I IN t-Il IIII ~1~,~ I IIIl't~J'I~ - II ll"""" "'""l IIIIIIt Illl IIIIIII I IIII II II It111 IIIII ( I M.H. / S.F. ....... ~tSj=.. TOTAL ,.-J MATERIA~ _ DIRECT JOB COST (NON OVERHEAD) SUMMARY c~.,. ' .RA.c. ov~..~ ~ ~ ~0 .... ~.~c~.~.~ IIIII ..o~. IIIII PRICING SHEET 0~.84 STATEWIDE PLUMBING, LLC 2612-A GOODES BRIDGE ROAD, SUITE 102 RICHMOND, VA 23224 (804) 674-6999 FAX (804) 674-9699 CHANGE ORDER RE: DATE: WE HEREBY SUBMIT CHANGES FOR ADDITIONAL WORK FOR AS PER BREAKDOWN: ADDITIONAL CHARGE FOR WORK ABOVE IS:. ts"g PAYMENT WILL BE MADE AS FOLLOWS: ~ CHANGE ORDERS: STATEWIDE PLUMBING LLC WIlL NOT EXECUTES CHANGE ORDERS UNLESS .aN EXECUTED/SIGNED COPY OF THE CH2MNGE 0RDEK HAS BEEN ILETUI~NED TO STATEWIDE PLUi~ffiING, LLC. ABOVE ADDITIONAL WORK TO BE PERFORMED UNDER SAME CONDITIONS AS SPECIFIED IN ORIGINAL CONTRACT UNLESS OTHERWISE STIPULATED. DATE:/~ --~_,-' O > AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE: WE HEREBY AGREE TO FURNISH LABOR AND MATERIALS COMPLETE IN ACCORDANCE WITH 'tHE ABOVE SPECIFICATIONS. AT ABOVE STATED PRICE. CONTRACTOR'S APPROVAL DATE: 000 .86 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page I of G Meetin~l Date: July 27, 2005 Item Number: Subiect: Developer Water and Sewer Contracts County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: 10.A. Board Action Requested: The Board of Supervisors has authorized the County Administrator to execute water and/or sewer contracts between County and Developer where there are no County funds involved. The report is submitted to Board members as information. Summary of Information' The following water and sewer contracts were executed Administrator: 1. Contract Number: Project Name: Developer: Contractor: Contract Amount: District: by the County 97-0152 Crescent Park, Lot #'s 1-9, Block 7, Oak Lawn Street Premium Homes, LLC Perkinson Construction Company Water Improvements - Wastewater Improvements - Bermuda $28,224.00 $17,806.00 Preparer: Craig S. Bryant Attachments: ---]Yes No Title: Director of Utilities 0001.87 Agenda Item July 27, 2005 Page 2 o Contract Number: Project Name: Developer: Contractor: Contract Amount: District: Contract Number: Project Name: Developer: Contractor: Contract Amount: District: Contract Number: Project Name: Developer: Contractor: Contract Amount: District: Contract Number: Project Name: Developer: Contractor: Contract Amount: District: 00-0100 Second Branch Baptist Water Second Branch Baptist Church Bookman Construction Company Water Improvements - Matoaca $62,010.00 02-0438 Southcreek, Section 9 800 Center, Incorporated Castle Equipment Corporation Water Improvements - Wastewater Improvements - Bermuda $62,185.00 $103,328.02 03-0090 Gill Grove Baptist Church - 10726 River Road Gill Grove Baptist Church Perkinson Construction Company Water Improvements - Matoaca $43,332.00 03-0163 Mexico Restaurant at 360 and Temie Lee Parkway Garcia Real Estate II, LC Perkinson Construction Company Water Improvements - Clover Hill $7,501.00 000 88 Agenda Item July 27, 2005 Page 3 o o Contract Number: Project Name: Developer: Contractor: Contract Amount: District: Contract Number: Project Name: Developer: Contractor: Contract Amount: District: Contract Number: Project Name: Developer: Contractor: Contract Amount: District: Contract Number: Project Name: Developer: Contractor: Contract Amount: District: 03-0174 Matoaca Christian Fellowship - River Road Trustees, Matoaca Christian Fellowship Possie B. Chenault, Incorporated Water Improvements - Matoaca $9,600.00 03-0204 Salisbury Presbyterian Church Sewer Extension Salisbury Presbyterian Church Bookman Construction Company Wastewater Improvements - Midlothian $108,162.00 03-0286 Oaklake - Builders Choice 2 William B. & Gene H. DuVal DuVal Development Incorporated Water Improvements - Wastewater Improvements - Clover Hill $22,874.79 $9,487.46 04-0001 Goodwyn Lumber - Bellwood Road Bellwood Investments, LLC Lyttle Utilities Incorporated Water Improvements - Bermuda $22,215.00 000:1.89 Agenda Item July 27, 2005 Page 4 10. 11. 12. 13. Contract Number: Project Name: Developer: Contractor: Contract Amount: District: Contract Number: Project Name: Developer: Contractor: Contract Amount: District: Contract Number: Project Name: Developer: Contractor: Contract Amount: District: Contract Number: Project Name: Developer: Contractor: Contract Amount: District: 04-0061 Riverdowns - King's Farm, Section 5 River Downs, LC Excalibur Construction Corporation Water Improvements - Wastewater Improvements - Midlothian 04-0105 Wellington Farms, Section E Miles and Wells, a Partnership R.M.C. Contractors, Incorporated Water Improvements - Wastewater Improvements - Bermuda 04-0126 Salisbury Village Salisbury Corporation R.M.C. Contractors, Incorporated Water Improvements - Wastewater Improvements - Midlothian 04-0224 Ivey Stone, Section 2 at Southbend Southbend Landing LLC R. J. Smith Construction, Incorporated Water Improvements - Wastewater Improvements - Bermuda $74,316.00 $97,738.00 $132,762.00 $59,190.00 $19,829.00 $20,554.00 $127,272.00 $100,423.00 OO0190 Agenda Item July 27, 2005 Page 5 14. 15. 16. 17. Contract Number: Project Name: Developer: Contractor: Contract Amount: District: Contract Number: Project Name: Developer: Contractor: Contract Amount: District: Contract Number: Project Name: Developer: Contractor: Contract Amount: District: Contract Number: Project Name: Developer: Contractor: Contract Amount: District: 04-0274 Katherman Harbourpoint II Katherman Investments, Incorporated Bookman Construction Company Water Improvements - Wastewater Improvements - Clover Hill $95,729.00 $76,750.00 04-0353 Blackwood Shops - Hull Street Road Southshore Shops, LLC Richard L. Crowder Construction Company Water Improvements - Wastewater Improvements - Clover Hill $88,198.23 $19,597.66 04-0471 National Welders Chesterfield Plant Expansion National Welders Supply Company Incorporated Gerald K. Moody Inc. T/A Southern Construction Co. Water Improvements - $6,175.00 Bermuda 04-0494 Market Square - Lifestyle Builders Market Square Commercial Associates LLC R. J. Smith Construction Incorporated Water Improvements - Wastewater Improvements - Clover Hill $65,854.94 $80,522.27 Agenda Item July 27, 2005 Page 6 18. Contract Number: Project Name: Developer: Contractor: Contract Amount: District: 05-0039 Priority Toyota Ellmer Properties Chesterfield LLC Castle Equipment Corporation Water Improvements - Wastewater Improvements - Bermuda $58,913.20 $25,425.27 19. Contract Number: Project Name: Developer: Contractor: Contract Amount: District: 05-0047 Johnston Willis Sari Medical Office Building J. W. Virginia, LLC Mayton Construction, Incorporated Water Improvements - Wastewater Improvements - Midlothian $62,623.00 $23,730.00 000192 AGENDA Meetin~l Date: July 27, 2005 Item Number: 10.B. Subject: Status of General Fund Balance, Reserve for Future Capital Projects, District Improvement Fund, and Lease Purchases County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Summary of Information: Preparer: Lane B. Ramsay Title: County Administrator Attachments: / Yes --] No BOARD MEETING DATE 07/01/04 07/01/04 07/01/04 07/01/04 11/23/04 11/23/04 11/23/04 11/23/04 11/23/04 11/23/04 07/01/05 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY GENERAL FUND BALANCE July 27, 2005 DESCRIPTION FY2005 Actual Beginning Fund Balance Hurricane Isabel accrual FY2005 Adjusted Beginning Fund Balance FY05 Addition to Fund Balance Designate excess revenue (County) for non-recurring items in FY2006 Designate excess expenditures (County) for non-recurring items in FY2006 Designate excess expenditures (Schools) for non-recurring items in FY2005 FY04 Results of Operations - restore CSA fund balance shortfall for use in FY2005 FY04 Results of Operations - Bond referendum expenditures in FY2005 FY04 Results of Operations - Pay plan adjustments in three departments in FY2005 FY06 Budgeted Addition to Fund Balance *Pending outcome of FY2005 Audit Results AMOUNT (3,379,255) 750,000 (2,163,220) (226,540) (3,077,862) (90,237) (6O,O0O) (257,800) 1,000,000 BALANCE $49,403,714 $46,024,459 $46,024,459 $46,774,459 $44,611,239 $44,384,699 $41,306,837 $41,216,600 $41,156,600 $40,898,800 $41,898,800 000194 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY RESERVE FOR FUTURE CAPITAL PROJECTS TRADITIONAI.LY FUNDED BY DEBT July 27, 2005 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2004 BEGINNING JULY 1, 2003 Board Meeting Date 4/9/2003 4/9/2003 7/23/2003 Description FY04 Budgeted Addition FY04 Capital Projects National search for a developer to revitalize the Cloverleaf Mall area 10/22/2003 Debris pick-up program due to Hurricane Isabel 4/14/2004 To General Services for building unexpected repairs and maintenance items incurred during FY04 4/14/2004 Tff to Sheriff for start-up expenses and capital for new replacement jail project 4/14/2004 Designate funding for police vehicles associated with the new COPS grant. Funds to be transferred to Police in FY2006 6/25/2004 Transfer for purchase of Public Safety command vehicle FOR FISCAL YEAR 2005 BEGINNING JULY 1, 2004 4/14/2004 FY05 Budgeted Addition 4/14/2004 FY05 Capital Projects 7/28/2004 Pre-development studies for Cloverleaf Mall 8/11/2004 Deposit on acquisition of the mall buildings at Cloverleaf Mall 9/3/2004 Purchase of public safety equipment for search and rescue, natural disasters and other emergency situations 10/13/2004 Operating costs associated with Cloverleaf Mall for 2004/2005 Amount 9,354,000 (8,559,300) (44,000) (1,000,000) (125,000) (260,00O) (500,000) (36,52O) 9,600,000 (8,496,900) (65,000) (250,000) (59,600) (500,000) Balance 12,047,512 3,488,212 3,444,212 2,444,212 2,319,212 2,059,212 1,559,212 1,522,692 11,122,692 2,625,792 2,560,792 2,310,792 2,251,192 1,751,192 000195 10/13/2004 10/13/2004 11/10/2004 3/23/2005 4/13/2005 5/25/2005 6/22/2005 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY RESERVE FOR FUTURE CAPITAL PROJECTS TRADITIONAl J X FUNDED BY DEBT July 27, 2005 Debt Service costs associated with IDA loan for Cloverleaf Mall Other Cloverleaf Mall operating costs (including costs associated with the acquisition of additional property) Woodmont Drive road and waterline repairs resulting from damage from Tropical Storm Gaston Woodmont Drive road and waterline repairs: bids exceeded staff estimates Chesterfield Aviation Museum Return of unspent funds: Woolridge Road Extension, Coalfield Rd & Rt. 360 project (transferred 9/25/96) Transfer to Schools: Cosby Road High School generator FOR FISCAL YEAR 2006 BEGINNING JULY 1, 2005 4/13/2005 FY06 Budgeted Addition 4/13/2005 FY06 Capital Projects (300,000) (250,000) (30,455) (6,711) (149,300) 306,485 (IS0,000) 9,492,000 (7,760,500) 1,451,192 1,201,192 1,170,737 1,164,026 1,014,726 1,321,211 1,171,211 10,663,211 2,902,711 00019(; 000197 Prepared by Accounting Department June 30, 2005 SCHEDULE OF CAPITALIZED LEASE PURCHASES Date Began 04/99 1/01 04/01 11/00 09/01 03/03 03/04 10/04 11/04 12/04 12/04 5/05 APPROVED AND EXECUTED Description Public Facility Lease - Juvenile Courts Project Certificates of Participation- Building Construction, Expansion and Renovation; Acquisition/Installation of Systems School Copier Lease #2 - Manchester High School School Copier Lease #3 - Chester Middle School School Server Lease Certificates of Participation - Building Construction, Expansion and Renovation Certificates of Participation - Building Construction, Expansion and Renovation; Acquisition/Installation of Systems Cloverleaf Mall Redevelopment Project School Archival/Retrieval System Lease Energy Improvements at County Facilities Energy Improvements at School Facilities Certificates of Participation - Building Acquisition, Construction, Installation, Furnishing and Equipping; Acquisition/Installation of Systems Original Amount $16,100,000 13,725,000 20,268 20,268 278,372 6,100,000 21,970,000 9,225,000 21,639 1,519,567 427,633 14,495,000 Date Ends 11/19 11/21 03/06 09/05 07/05 11/23 11/24 10/06 01/08 12/17 12/10 11/24 Outstanding Balance 06/30/05 $12,075,000 10,965,000 3,684 1,257 58,647 5,780,000 21,970,000 9,225,000 17,699 1,519,567 427,633 14,495,000 TOTAL APPROVED AND EXECUTED PENDING EXECUTION Descr~tion $83.902.747 $76.538.487 Approved Amount O0019S CHESTERFIELD COUNTY ~~ BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page I of 1 AGENDA Meetin~l Date: July27,2005 Item Number: 10.C. Subiect: Roads Accepted into the State Secondary System County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator:~~_._._J~~ Board Action Requested: Summary of Information: Preparer: Lisa H. Elko Title: Clerk to the Board Attachments: 1Yes I--]No # ~00199 0 ~ 0~0200 00020~ 0~)0203 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page I of I Meetin~l Date: July 27, 2005 Item Number: 10.D. Subiect: Report of Planning Commission Substantial Accord Determination on VA 1084 K Commonwealth Center, ~ommunications Tower (Case 05PD0359) County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: On June 21, 2005, the Planning Commission confirmed the Planning Director's decision that Case 05PD0359 is in substantial accord with the Comprehensive Plan. Staff recommends no action. Summary of Information: The Commission confirmed the Planning Director's decision that this request is substantially in accord with the Comprehensive Plan. State law provides that the Board may overrule the Planning Commission's determination or refer the matter back to the Planning Commission for an additional public hearing and decision. If the Board takes no action, the substantial accord determination will become final. Staff recommends no action. Preparer: Kirkland A. Turner Title: Director of Planning Attachments: Yes ~ No #000;804 I I I '.41, 000:805 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page I of I Meetin~l Date: July27, 2005 Item Number: 11. Subiect: Closed Session County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Summary of Information: Closed session pursuant to § 2.2-3711(A) (7), Code of Virqinia, 1950, as amended, for consultation with legal counsel on specific legal matters regarding an allegation of regulation of interstate commerce at a private landfill located in the County. Preparer: Steven L. Micas Attachments: ['~ Yes No Title: County Attorney 050:69495.1 ~00;~06 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page I of I Meetin~l Date: July 27, 2005 Item Number: 1.g.A. Subiect: Resolution Recognizing Ms. Frances B. Daniel, Social Services Department, Upon Her Retirement County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Staff requests the Board adopt the attached resolution. Summary of Information: Staff requests the Board adopt the attached resolution recognizing Ms. Frances B. Daniel for 36 years of service to Chesterfield/Colonial Heights Department of Social Services. Preparer: Sarah C. Snead Title: Director-Social Services Attachments: Ycs r--]No #000207 RECOGNIZING MS. FRANCES B. DANIEL UPON HER RETIREMENT WHEREAS, Ms. Frances B. Daniel began her career at the Chesterfield-Colonial Heights Department of Social Services on August 21, 1969 and has been a dedicated and loyal employee for 36 years; and WHEREAS, Ms. Daniel has excelled in providing outstanding customer service to the agency's many customers and the citizens of Chesterfield County and Colonial Heights; and WHEREAS, in addition to providing administrative support to the Assistant Director of Benefit Programs, Ms. Daniel performed many other duties on behalf of the entire department; and WHEREAS, Ms. Daniel served as secretary of the department's Quality Council, and also participated as a valued member of many agency goal groups; and WHEREAS, Ms. Daniel represented the agency as a volunteer with the American Heart Walk; and WHEREAS, Ms. Daniel will take with her a vast knowledge of the history of the Social Services Department and its extensive changes and growth over the years. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors, this 27tn day of July 2005, publicly recognizes the outstanding contributions of Ms. Frances B. Daniel, expresses the appreciation of all residents for her service to the county and offers congratulations upon her retirement. AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that a copy of the resolution be presented to Ms. Daniel and that this resolution be permanently recorded among the papers of this Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County, Virginia. 000 08 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page I of I Meetin~l Date: July 27, 2005 Item Number: 15.B. Subiect: Resolution Recognizing Mr. Christopher H. Davis, Mr. Elliot R. Meek, Mr. Kevin Daniel Irby, Mr. Kevin Leahy, Mr. Joseph Edward Loeffler, and Mr. Michael P. Baker, Ail from Troop 876, Sponsored by Mount Pisgah United Methodist Church, Upon Attaining Rank of Eagle Scout County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Adoption of the attached resolution. Summary of Information: Staff has received requests for the Board to adopt resolutions recognizing Mr. Christopher H. Davis, Mr. Elliot R. Meek, Mr. Kevin Daniel Irby, Mr. Kevin Leahy, Mr. Joseph Edward Loeffler, and Mr. Michael P. Baker, all from Troop 876, upon attaining the rank of Eagle Scout. Ail will be present at the meeting, accompanied by members of their families, to accept the resolutions. Preparer: Lisa H. Elko Title: Clerk to the Board Attachments: Yes ~ No 000209 WHEREAS, the Boy Scouts of America was incorporated by Mr. William D. Boyce on February 8, 1910, and was chartered by Congress in 1916; and WHEREAS, the Boy Scouts of America was founded to build character, provide citizenship training and promote physical fitness; and WHEREAS, after earning at least twenty-one merit badges in a wide variety of skills including leadership, service and outdoor life, serving in a leadership position in a troop, carrying out a service project beneficial to their community, being active in the troop, demonstrating Scout spirit, and living up to the Scout Oath and Law Mr. Elliot R. Meek, Mr. Christopher H. Davis, Mr. Kevin Daniel Irby, Mr. Joseph Edward Loeffler, Mr. Kevin Leahy and Mr. Michael P. Baker, all of Troop 876, sponsored by Mount Pisgah United Methodist Church, have accomplished those high standards of commitment and have reached the long-sought goal of Eagle Scout which is received by only four percent of those individuals entering the Scouting movement; and WHEREAS, growing through their experiences in Scouting, learning the lessons of responsible citizenship, and endeavoring to prepare themselves for roles as leaders in society, Elliot, Chris, Kevin, Joey, Kevin and Michael have distinguished themselves as members of a new generation of prepared young citizens of whom we can all be very proud. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors, this 25th day of May 2005, hereby extends its congratulations to Mr. Elliot R. Meek, Mr. Christopher H. Davis, Mr. Kevin Daniel Irby, Mr. Joseph Edward Loeffler, Mr. Kevin Leahy and Mr. Michael P. Baker, and acknowledges the good fortune of the county to have such outstanding young men as its citizens. 0002 0 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page I of I Meetinv Date: Jul}/27, 2005 Item Number: 15.C. Subject: Resolution Recognizing Thomas Dale High School Boys Varsity Soccer Team as State Champions County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: The Honorable R. M. ~Dickie" King, Jr. has requested that the Board of Supervisors commend and recognize the Thomas Dale Knights Boys Varsity Soccer Team for its superior achievement and representation of Chesterfield County and its residents. Summary of Information: The Thomas Dale Knights Boys Varsity Soccer Team completed the 2005 season with a 24-0 record, winning the Central District Regular Season Championship and the Central Region Championship and they were the State AAA Champions. Preparer: Michael S. Golden Title: Director, Parks and Recreation Attachments: Yes [~No 000Zll RECOGNIZING THE THOMAS DALE HIGH SCHOOL BOYS VARSITY SOCCER TEAM FOR ITS OUTSTANDING ACCOMPLISHMENTS WHEREAS, participation in high school sports has long been an integral part of Chesterfield County's educational, physical and emotional development for students; and WHEREAS, Mr. Mark Fowler, coach of the Thomas Dale High School Boys Varsity Soccer Team completed his eleventh year as coach and was named Central District, Central Region, Tri-City and State Triple A Coach of the Year; and WHEREAS, under the guidance and direction of Coach Fowler and his staff, the 2005 Thomas Dale Knights finished the season with an overall record of 24-0; and WHEREAS, the Thomas Dale Knights were the Central District Regular Season Champions; and WHEREAS, the Knights were the Central Region Champions; and WHEREAS, the Thomas Dale Knights were the State AAA Boys Soccer Champions; and WHEREAS, the Knights Sportsmanship Award. were also awarded the State AAA NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors, this 27th day of July 2005, publicly recognizes the Thomas Dale High School Boys Varsity Soccer Team for its outstanding representation of Chesterfield County, commends the AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors, on behalf of the citizens of Chesterfield County, commends the 2005 Thomas Dale Knights for their commitment to excellence and sportsmanship and expresses their best wishes for continued success. oooZ .z CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page I of q Meeting Date: July 27, 2005 Item Number: 17.A. Subiect: Public Hearing to Consider an Ordinance to Establish the ~Beckham Drive Sewer Assessment District" for Four Lots in the Englewood Subdivision County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Staff requests that the Board of Supervisors adopt the attached ordinance to establish the ~Beckham Drive Sewer Assessment District", appropriate funds in the amount of $40,500 for the project from the sewer fund balance, and set interest rate based on the index of average yield on United States Treasury securities adjusted to a constant maturity of one year as made available by the Federal Reserve Bank at the time the assessment ordinance is adopted. Summary of Information: On October 22, 2003 the Board of Supervisors created the 24-1ot ~Englewood Sewer Assessment District". That sewer line extension is currently under construction. The Utilities Department has received a request to create an assessment district for an additional four (4) lots. This will necessitate deviating from the County's design/construction specifications to allow less than the normal minimum ground cover over a sewer line, and will require lowering an existing water line. Three (3) of the four property owners support creation of the assessment district. A public hearing was held on May 25, 2005. One property owner spoke in opposition, citing no problems with an existing septic system since repairs were done about 5 years ago. The Board postponed action on the matter until their June 22, 2005 meeting, and requested that the Utilities Department provide the Board with information regarding the current conditions of the existing septic systems and options, other than the assessment district, that the property owners may have investigated. At the June 22, 2005 meeting the Board postponed action until their July 27, 2005. In response to the Board's request Utilities Department staff contacted each of the property owners to determine if they had experienced problems with their septic systems and to arrange for inspections by the Health Department. Preparer: Craig S. Bryant Attachments: Yes ~-~ No Title: Director of Utilities 000; 3.3 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 2 of q Meetin l Date: May 25, 2005 o o o 9416 Beckham Drive Mrs. Apperson indicated she has experienced no problems with her septic system. Health Department records indicate the septic tank was last pumped out on 11/15/2000. An inspection was performed and the system was found to be functioning properly. The site was evaluated for installation of a new system and the estimated cost is $8,950. 9417 Beckham Drive Mr. Andes indicated that he has his system pumped out frequently, usually every 6 months to 1 year. He also said that there has been an occasion where the effluent has come out of the tank. He says that no two people take showers at the same time and everyone in the family is very cautious not to overload the system. He looked into alternatives and was given a price of $14,000 to install a low-pressure mound system, but opted not to pursue this alternative because of aesthetics since it would be in the front of the house. He also said that the life expectancy of such a system could be only 3-5 years. Health Department records indicate the system was last pumped out on 7/31/2000. An inspection was performed and the system was found to be functioning properly. The site was evaluated for installation of a new system and the estimated cost is $7,450. 9427 Beckham Drive Mrs. Ott indicated she had experienced a problem with roots in her septic system about three years ago, which was corrected. When a survey was conducted to determine if her property could be served by an extension of the public sewer line the septic tank was found to be full and the tank was pumped. The Health Department performed an inspection and found the system to be functioning properly. There was no record of the septic system having been previously pumped. The site was evaluated for installation of a new septic/drainfield system and the estimated cost is $20,350. 9426 Beckham Drive Ms. Harwell previously indicated that her system had been repaired in the past few years and the system was functioning properly so inspection by the Health Department was not requested. 0002'14 Meetin l Date: May 25, 2005 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 3 of ~/ If an assessment district is created, the County will initially pay all engineering, construction and other costs to extend a public sewer line that will serve 9416, 9417, 9426 and 9427 Beckham Drive. The sewer assessment on each lot may be paid in a lump sum or over a 20-year period in semi-annual installments. Property owners, who occupy a home within the assessment district, and who are aged 65 or over, may qualify to have their assessment payments deferred until ownership changes. The property owners will also pay interest at a rate, which will be the index of average yield on United States Treasury securities adjusted to a constant maturity of one year, as made available by the Federal Reserve Bank at the time the assessment ordinance is adopted. A lien in the total amount of the assessment for each property will be recorded. The total estimated cost for the additional sewer line extension is $40,500 The proposed ~Beckham Drive Sewer Assessment District" would include four (4) lots, with the assessment per lot being $10,125. Of the four property owners, three (75%) are in support and one (25%) is in opposition. In order for the Board to create the ~Beckham Drive Sewer Assessment District", at least 2/3 members (4 out of 5) must be in favor of adopting the attached ordinance. A map of the proposed assessment district, and a list of the property owners and assessments are also attached. 0002 $ CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 4 of 4 Meeting Date: July 27, 2005 Bud_~et and Mana.qement Comments: This agenda item requests that the Board hold a public hearing to consider an ordinance to establish a sewer assessment district on Beckham Drive. This item also requests that the Board authorize the appropriation of funds in the amount of $40,500 for the sewer line extension project and set an interest rate at the index of average yield on United States Treasury Securities adjusted to a constant maturity of one year as made available by the Federal Reserve Bank at the time the assessment ordinance is adopted. Funding in the amount of $40,500 is available in the Sewer fund balance to complete the sewer line extension project. Preparer: Rebecca T. Dickson Title: Director~ Budget and Manaqement 000;~.6 AN ORDINANCE CREATING THE BECKHAM DRIVE SPECIAL TAX OR ASSESSMENT SEWER DISTRICT, IMPOSING ASSESSMENT AGAINST LAND OWNERS IN THE DISTRICT AND PROVIDING FOR SUSPENSION OF PAYMENT FOR CERTAIN ELDERLY OWNERS BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County: (1) That the Beckham Drive Special Tax or Assessment Sewer District is created as follows: Section 1. Definitions. In the context of this ordinance, the following words shall have the following meaning: District: The Beckham Drive Special Tax or Assessment Sewer District. Map of the District: The map entitled "Beckham Drive Sewer Assessment District" prepared by the County Department of Utilities, which map is on file with the director of utilities. Section 2. Establishment of the Beckham Drive Special Tax or Assessment Sewer District. Pursuant to Code of Virginia, Section 15.2-2404 et seq., there is hereby created in the county the Beckham Drive Special Tax or Assessment Sewer District. The area of the district shall be and the same is hereby fixed within the boundaries depicted on the map of the district. Section 3. Construction of certain sewer facilities in and adjacent to the district. The utilities department shall cause to be constructed in and adjacent to the district the sewer line and appurtenant facilities depicted on the map of the district. Section 4. Taxes or assessments upon owners of property located within the district. The cost of construction of the sewer line and appurtenant facilities located within the district shall be apportioned among the owners of property abutting the sewer line. The amount of the tax or assessment charged to each such owner shall be one fourth (1/4) of the total cost of the improvements constructed within the district, including the legal, financial and other directly attributable costs incurred by the County. The one fourth (1/4) charge shall be assessed against each lot located in the district. The amount finally taxed or assessed against each landowner shall be reported to the treasurer as soon as practicable after completion of the sewer line and appurtenant facilities located within the district, and the treasurer shall enter the same as provided for other taxes. Section 5. Installment payment of assessments. Any person against whom an assessment provided for in this article has been finally made shall pay the full amount of the assessment provided for in this article, on the due date of the first tax bill on which such assessment is shown. In no event, however, shall any part of the assessment be due prior to the completion of the sewer line and appurtenant facilities constructed pursuant to this article. As an alternative to payment as provided above, a person against whom an assessment provided for in this article has been made may pay such assessment in forty (40) equal 000gl? semiannual principal installments over a period of twenty (20) years, together with simple interest on the unpaid principal balance at an annual rate equal to the index of average yield on United States Treasury Securities adjusted to a constant maturity of one year as made available by the Federal Reserve Bank on the date when this ordinance was adopted. The first of such installments shall be due on and interest on the unpaid principal balance shall accrue from the date on which the full amount of the assessment would otherwise have been due as provided above. Section 6. Suspension of payment of assessments. Payment of assessments otherwise due under this ordinance shall be suspended for any owner who owned property on the day the ordinance creating the assessment district was adopted and who occupies a residential building located on the property and is 65 years of age or older. However when the property is no longer occupied by a person who is 65 years of age or older or is conveyed to another person or persons, irrespective of the age of the person or persons to whom the property is conveyed, the suspension of payments shall cease and the entire assessment, including accrued interest, shall be immediately due and payable. It shall be the obligation of any such owner to provide a driver's license or other photo identification establishing proof of age satisfactory to the director of utilities in order for such suspension to become effective. Section 7. This ordinance shall not be set out in the County Code but shall be kept on file in the office of the director of utilities. (2) This ordinance shall be in effect immediately upon its adoption. 0002't8 BECKHAM DRIVE SEWER ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 2502 2500 % '"~2450 \ 2440 ~~ 2448 9514 9505 9528 9523 9504 9447 9520 2324 9446 9429 9512 2332 9436 9427 9504 I I I 2430 9426 9417 9422 2333 9416 9407 2300 2252 2420 9406 243' 2421 2411 ! ! 2401 9320 9310 CEDAR CREST 9311 93099: D Proposed Assessment District Proposed Manhole Proposed Wastewater F'~ Proposed Parcels for Assessment Distdct Chesterfield County Department of Utilities 1 inch equals 125 feet 000219 BECKHAM DRIVE SEWER ASSESSMENT DISTRICT D Proposed Assessment District 0 Proposed Manhole ~ Proposed Wastewater '---]Proposed Parcols for Assessment District Chesterfield County Department of Utilities 1 inch equals 400 feet 000; 0 P. O, Box 85~3 Richmend, Vir§inia 23293-~01 220g0f CHF,~TE~'FfFJ D ~ ~de ~scdption Ad Size Tota~ PubliSher of 07/13/2005 07/20/2005 The first insertion being ~ befere 2I 13993 Su CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page I of 3 Meetin~l Date: Jul~f 27, 2005 Item Number: 17.B. Subiect: Public Hearing to Amend Section 14-23 and Repeal Section 14-24 of the County Code Relating to Use of Alcohol on Certain Public Property County Administrator's Comments= /?~~c~ ~~ County Administrator: Board Action Requested: The Board is requested to hold a public hearing to consider amending § 14-23 and repealing § 14-25 of the County Code relating to the use of alcohol on certain public property. Summary of Information: The County has for many years prohibited by ordinance the use of alcohol in County parks and on all other County property such as Henricus, Eppington, Castlewood and Magnolia Grange. The Henricus Foundation has recently requested that the County consider changing its ordinance to allow the consumption of alcohol at Henricus. The Henricus Foundation has indicated that they have lost several opportunities to rent the indoor facility for special events due to the prohibition on the use of alcohol. The Historical Society, which operates Magnolia Grange and Castlewood, also supports lifting the restriction. The proposed ordinance would limit alcohol consumption to Henricus, Eppington, Castlewood, Magnolia Grange and the senior center at Huguenot Park when it is constructed. State law allows the County to permit the use of alcohol on its property so long as the use complies with Alcohol and Beverage Control ("ABC") regulations and any restrictions the ABC imposes through its "special events" permits. In addition, the proposed ordinance amendment requires the Parks and Recreation Department to adopt County regulations that would also govern Preparer: Steven L. Micas Title: County Attorne¥ 0623 (00) :69473.1 (68962.1) Attachments: Yes ~ No 000221 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 2 of 3 use of alcohol on County property through an administrative application process similar to that currently used for outdoor music festivals. Under the permit process, the following general restrictions would apply in addition to other restrictions that Parks & Recreation deems appropriate based on individual permit requests: Permits for events using alcohol will be restricted to individuals holding private functions. Additionally, the Henricus Foundation, Eppington Foundation and Chesterfield Historical Society may use alcohol at invitation-only events they sponsor. 2. Sale of alcohol will be prohibited. 3. Alcohol will be permitted only in the following designated areas: ao Henricus Historical Park - Alcohol will be permitted at events in the Educational Center (first floor); outside the Educational Center within 50 yards; in Mt. Malady; outside Mt. Malady but within the perimeter barrier. bo Eppington - Alcohol will be permitted in the first floor of the house for Eppington Foundation sponsored activities only. Public rentals will be permitted outside the house within 100 yards. Castlewood - Alcohol will be permitted only in the ballroom and only for Historical Society sponsored activities. Public rentals will be permitted outside the rear of the building within 50 yards. do Magnolia Grange - Alcohol may be permitted only on the first floor and only for Historical Society sponsored activities. Public rentals will be permitted outside the rear of the building within 50 yards. The number of attendees at an event will be limited to a number that can be appropriately accommodated at the requested facility, considering security, parking limitations, and other factors. 5. Fees for rental of the facilities will be established. 6. A $150 damage/clean-up deposit will be required. o Insurance coverage as recommended by the County's Risk Manager will be required. 8. The County may require the provision by the applicant of additional 0623(00) :69473.1(68962.1) CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 3 of 3 security and the permit holder will be required to remain on the premises at all times during the event. o The County will remove any persons from County property who do not follow the ABC banquet license conditions and County regulations and reserves the right to prohibit their future use of County facilities. 0623(00) :69473.1(68962.1) O00;~;~G AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE CODE OF THE COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD, 1997, AS AMENDED, BY AMENDING AND RE-ENACTING SECTION 14-23 AND REPEALING SECTION 14-24 RELATING TO USE OF ALCOHOL ON PUBLIC PROPERTY BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County: (1) That Section 14-23 of the Code of the County o£ Chesterfield, 1997, as amended, is amended and re-enacted and section 14-24 is repealed to read as follows: Sec. 14-23. Drinking alcoholic beverages, or tendering same to another, in a county park. (a) No person shall possess opened alcoholic beverage containers or drink an alcoholic beverage or tender a drink of an alcoholic beverage to another in a county park provided, however, that alcoholic beverages may be consumed at an event held at the following locations: Henricus, Eppington, Castlewood, Magnolia Grange and the senior center at Huguenot Park after obtaining a valid banquet license issued by the Virginia Department of Alcohol Beverage Control and agreeing to comply with the terms of a special permit issued by the county administrator. The county Department of Parks and Recreation shall promulgate regulations for the issuance of permits authorized by this section. (b) No person shall possess opened alcoholic beverage containers on any county property used for a school or on any street, road, or highway located in the county. (-b) (c) Violation of this section shall constitute a class 4 misdemeanor. 'NT ........ k,~ll ............ ,-1 ,~lr, r,l~,-~lir, 1., ........... t,-,;, ; ....... *-, park t--,..:e, ........ publ':c ..... t. (2) That this ordinance shall become effective immediately upon adoption. 0623(00):68962.1 000224 An Aff~ate of ~ed~a Genem~ Richmond, Vi~ini~ 23293400~ ~s~iption Ad Size Total C~st HERE Media General Operations, Publisher of THE RICHMOND TIMES~D~SPATCH This is to certify that the attached TAKF: N©TICETAKF; N(~TW~'~ was published by R~chmomd ~mes~D~s~tch, ~c~ ~ the City ~f R~chmo~d~ Stme ~f Vkg~a, on the fo~W~g dates: 07/13/2005 07/20/2005 The first insert]on being g~ven,. Newspaper reference: 2114000 Sworn to and subscribed before State of Virginia city of ~ic~ond My C°mm~ss~on expkes K~MBERLY HARRIS NOTARY PUBUO ;OM~ONWEALTH OF VtRGIN~A CO~,'~M EXPS~ JAN. 3t. 2009 TH~$ ~$ NOT A B~LL PLEASE PAY FRO E. THANK CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page I of 2 Meetin~l Date: Subject: July 27, 2005 Item Number: 13.C. to The Plan for Villaqe Plan and Public Hearing for The Chester Plan, an amendment Chesterfield, including replacement of the Chester amendments to the Central Area Plan and the Thorouqhfare Plan County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Approval of The Chester Plan, an amendment to the Plan for Chesterfield, including replacement of the Chester Villaqe Plan and amendments to the Central Area Plan and the Thorouqhfare Plan, as recommended by the Planning Commission, with an additional revision to the definition of Neighborhood Mixed Use as recommended by staff. Summary of Information: The Planning Commission held their public hearing on The Chester Plan on April 19, 2005. After revisions requested by Mr. Wilson, the Planning Commission recommended approval of the Plan on May 17, 2005. Major Recommendations of the Plan include: · Allow adaptive reuse of historic structures · Implementation of a pedestrian network · Adoption of design guidelines for the Route 10 corridor · Decreases in residential density from the current plan · Limitation on new multi-family development · Reduction of West Hundred Road from a 90 foot Major Arterial to a 70 foot Collector between Branders Bridge Road and Route 10 Preparer: Kirkland A. Turner Title: Director of Planning Department Attachments: No #000225 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 2 of 2 · Deletion of the proposed Collector from Centralia Road south to the proposed North/South Arterial along the old Seaboard Coast railroad · Deletion of the proposed Major Arterial (Hopkins Road Realigned) from just south of Route 288 overpass to Chester Road across from Hamlin Creek Parkway Subsequent to the Planning Commission's recommendation to approve The Chester Plan, staff identified and now recommends approval of the following revised definition for Neighborhood Mixed Use on page 8 of the plan. This change further clarifies the types and mixes of uses considered appropriate within the Neighborhood Mixed Use areas suggested on The Chester Plan. Original definition: ~Neighborhood Mixed Use: A mix of neighborhood scale retail and service, professional and administrative offices, along with residential developments of varying densities. Supporting, neighborhood-scale retail and service uses would be appropriate when part of a mixed use development of aggregated acreage under a unified plan of development. R-MF, R-TH, 0-2, C-2" Revised definition as recommended by staff: ~Neighborhood Mixed Use: Professional and administrative offices, along with residential developments of varying densities. Neighborhood-scale retail and service uses that serve primarily office and residential developments would be appropriate when part of a mixed use development of aggregated acreage under a unified plan of development and when located with access to intersecting transportation corridors. R-MF, R- TH, 0-2, C-2" The note for this land use in the Plan document would remain unchanged. 000226 The Chester Plan As Recommended for Approval By The Chesterfield County Planning Commission May 17, 2005 000~;~'7 THE PLAN FOR CHESTERFIELD The Chester Plan THE CHESTER PLAN Prepared by the Chesterfield County Planning Department P. O. Box 40 Chesterfield, VA 23832 804/748-1 O55 www.chesterfield.gov/plan Introduction Study Area Boundaries The boundary of the Chester Plan study area includes the geography of the Chester Villa,qe Plan (1989). Generally, to the north, Route 288 is the boundary; to the east, Jefferson Davis Highway; Happy Hill and Baldwin Roads to the south; Branders Bridge Road to the southwest; and Chalkley, Centralia, and Hopkins Roads to the northwest. Changes from the 1989 geography include: the addition of the Carver Heights neighborhood and the neighborhood centered in the historic Centralia area around Old Lane and Hopkins Road. The plan area is approximately 10.5 square miles, comprising about two percent of the land area of the county. Magisterial District The Plan study area is almost entirely contained within the Bermuda Magisterial District, with a small portion of the Plan area (north of Centralia Road) located in the Dale Magisterial District. How this Plan Works The Chester Plan amendment, once adopted by the Board of Supervisors, will become part of The Plan for Chesterfield, the county's comprehensive plan. The Plan for Chesterfield is used by county citizens, staff, the Planning Commission and the Board of Supervisors as a guide for future decisions affecting Chesterfield County including, but not limited to decisions regarding future land use, transportation networks and zoning actions. Once the Chester Plan is adopted, it will replace the existing Chester Village Plan (adopted in 1989) and two small areas of the Central Area Plan (adopted in 1997). Staff Analysis The Planning Department, in conjunction with other county departments, assessed existing conditions within the Chester area and performed an analysis of land use and public facilities needs and trends in the area. The results were summarized and shared with public officials and interested citizens. These assessments and analyses, along with citizen input, form the basis for the goals and recommendations of the plan. The complete text of the analyses performed are available from the Planning Department. Citizen Participation Planning Department staff, together with representatives from other county departments, maintained close contact with the community organizations that serve Chester and over the course of the plan process, over 20 meetings were held with citizens. Citizens shared their concerns and ideas with staff, and offered their input to the vision, goals, recommendations and land use for the area. A Plan for Action The Chester Plan should guide future development in ways that provide balanced benefits to the community, property owners, existing citizens and future citizens. The land use plan makes no attempt to determine the current or short-term marketability of any one parcel for any particular land use. Rather, it attempts to anticipate future needs for broad categories of uses throughout the study area for the next 20 years. The Plan does not rezone land, but may suggest Ordinance amendments and other actions. Finally, the plan suggests the proper relationship between differing land uses within the community. 4/28/2005 I Planning Commission Draft O00; ; S THE PLAN FOR CHESTERFIELD The Chester Plan To provide this guidance, and allow citizens to anticipate the nature of future development, the Board of Supervisors and Planning Commission have incorporated guidelines into Plan amendments through goals and recommendations. Vision A group of Chester citizens met on March 2nd, 2004 with Planning Department staff to discuss their vision for the future of Chester. The vision statement is broad in nature and describes the community's idea of what Chester would be like if it was perfect. Vision statements are not meant to be achievable or practical; rather, they are meant to provide a mental picture of what could be. This mental picture assists the community in deciding what projects or actions are worthwhile. The implementation of a vision statement occurs over time and through the actions of many people and organizations. The inclusion of the vision statement in the plan is meant to guide and inform readers about what the community hopes for the future; it is not meant to imply that the Plan can achieve these outcomes. The Plan is only one small part of the community's future. Chester is a healthy, walkable community with a charming, identifiable core where residents and visitors are drawn to the amenities found there, including a magnificent, well used library and community arts center. The historic villages of Chester and Centralia are preserved and enhanced and attract residents and visitors. There is a thriving and friendly small business community with all buildings occupied in the village. People can walk from home to the village center, along tree lined streets, their completed linear park, or to the many pocket and community parks in the area. The neighborhoods are well organized, connected to the pedestrian network, and participate actively in community evens and organizing block parties. There is well maintained, efficiently planned high quality transportation network that includes excellent roads, alternative transportation to Richmond, and a high speed rail access in the village. Goals and Recommendations Chester Plan Area The Introduction to the Plan for Chesterfield encourages the shaping of Chesterfield's communities by molding development into well designed and attractive communities of special character. To this end, the Introduction suggests that functionally and visually distinctive communities and historic villages, such as Chester, together with the surrounding natural resources and community character, should be preserved. Village character can be achieved through the provision of village type streetscape improvements, including sidewalks, streetlights and street trees. It also includes compatible architecture and mixed use development in the village center. To these ends, the Land Use Plan and Goals and Recommendations of The Chester Plan are designed to encourage village type and scale development within the village center, with decreasing densities of residential development as one moves further from the center of the village. Design standards for the Route 10 corridor and plan wide recommendations for a pedestrian network are also part of the strategy to maintain Chester's special sense of community. The Goals and Recommendations that best apply to the Chester Plan study area are: Goal 1 Ensure that new residential proposals are representative of, and compatible with, existing and anticipated area residential development: Actions that stabilize and improve the health of existing neighborhoods forestall decline and blight and contribute to the overall health of the larger community. Recommendations Continue to use the Plan and the zoning process to encourage new residential zoning with sole access through an existing or planned subdivision to meet or exceed the average lot size of, and have a density equal to or less than, the existing subdivision. 4/28/2005 2 Planning Commission Draft 000229 THE PLAN FOR CHESTERFIELD The Chester Plan Additional multi-family development in the Chester Plan area is not encouraged outside of the Neighborhood Mixed Use area. There are a variety of housing types and an adequate supply of affordable housing in the overall community, and additional development in transitional areas (designated for office-residential mixed use) should be focused on single-family residential of up to four units to the acres, duplexes and age restricted developments such as zero-lot line homes or townhouses. Develop a countywide program to explore criteria and methods for voluntary down-zonings in areas currently zoned for R-7 and R-9 uses. The program would look at appropriate locations, land use plan designations, the availability of utilities and aggregation of properties to create larger areas of less dense zoning, as opposed to a patchwork quilt of zoning categories in a particular area. As appropriate criteria are determined, property owners could be contacted by the county to determine interest in a county initiated down-zoning. All down-zonings would be voluntary. As a pilot project for the program three property owners in the Centralia area have expressed interest in down-zoning their property. Residential developments of varying densities and lot sizes encourage variety in residential areas and offer county citizens a choice of neighborhoods, living environments and lifestyles. Limitations and opportunities: New subdivisions developing within the study area increase the availability of housing in this part of the county. However, such residential development should be designed to protect existing neighborhoods and enhance the larger community, especially where there is an existing development pattern that is less dense than the allowed density of the new subdivision. The county has limited statutory ability to demand less dense development in these locations. Goal 2 Protect and preserve historic and cultural resources. Several sites and structures within the study area have historic or cultural significance. Chester retains 60 structures catalogued by Jeffrey O'Dell, in his book, Chesterfield County: Early Architecture and Historic Sites (1983). There are also many other historic structures that should also be noted and retained. In Chesterfield County, there are currently 39 historic landmarks that have been designated through the county's Historic Districts and Landmarks Ordinance. Eleven of these designated landmarks are in the Chester Plan area. The Ordinance provides regulatory protection to a structure by providing review of alterations. Addition to the list is voluntary, and is managed by the Preservation Committee. Recommendations Encourage the preservation of identified historic structures in the Chester area by allowing adaptive reuse that is compatible with existing and anticipated area development. Specifically, historic structures may be appropriate for light commercial uses if the property owner is retaining the structure, is willing to have it designated as a Chesterfield County historic landmark, and mitigates impacts of commercial development on the surrounding properties. Due to the rural residential nature of the Centralia community, adaptive reuse of historic structures in the Centralia community west of the railroad tracks is not appropriate. The Introduction to the Plan For Chesterfield encourages the identification and preservation of lands, sites and structures that have archeological and/or historic significance. To this end, Comprehensive Plan amendments attempt to identify structures and sites within study area boundaries that have historic 4/28/2005 3 Planning Commission Draft 000; ,30 THE PLAN FOR CHESTERFIELD The Chester Plan or cultural significance. Protection of such structures and sites offer the best opportunities for presenting and interpreting the county's historic and cultural heritage. Limitations and opportunities: Chester was founded by Charles Stebbins and Joseph Snead, who platted the streets and lots for the village in the mid 1850's at the intersection of two railroads. The streets drawn by Stebbins and Snead are: Petersburg, Winfree, Richmond and Percival streets, running approximately east-west. The cross streets are: Dodomeade, Gill, Curtis, West, Snead, Stebbins, and Daniel. The village had convenient railroad access, easy road access to the Petersburg-Richmond Turnpike, and bordered current Route 10, which was, even then, a major thoroughfare. The study area also includes the historic settlement of Centralia. Centralia was a train stop on the line from Richmond, and was a busy neighborhood when regular train service was available. It has several historic homes still existing today, and the benefit of the existing setting, which retains its sense of history. Many of the early homes of Chester are still in place today, and there has been increased interest in the last several years in rehabilitating these historic homes. *- The source for the historic summary is Chesterfield County, Earlv Architecture and HistQd(;: Sites. by Jeffrey O'Dell. Goal 3 Create a network of safe and pleasant biking and walking routes throughout the community. Numerous customer contacts made through the customer service process have emphasized the value of a community connected by a pedestrian network. While citizens recognize that this is a long term goal that will be achieved through a focused effort, the Chester Plan seeks to provide the guide for the future network. The Land Use Plan map recommends a comprehensive pedestrian network which would be made up of both trails and sidewalks. Where there was interest and consensus on the value of a pedestrian network connection, the segment is shown on the map. No evaluations were made as to the practical or physical limitations of any particular connection. Therefore, not every connection will occur. The map is intended to provide guidance for where a pedestrian network should be pursued. Recommendations Adopt an amendment to the Zoning Ordinance requiring the development of trails and sidewalks with new development in areas with designated pedestrian network corridors where appropriate and as shown on the land use plan map. For future road construction projects, including upgrades and expansions, on roads designated to include a pedestrian network, addition to the pedestrian network should be included as part of the project where practical and supported by the community and those property owners most affected. · When new sidewalks are constructed in the area, where space allows, a planting strip of street trees should separate the sidewalk from the street. Enhanced crosswalks for Chester should be provided. Based on citizen comments, some of the locations that are priorities for these improvements are: at major intersections along Route 10, near schools and parks, and at intersections of arterial and collector roads. Crosswalks should be designed as visual enhancements, alerting drivers to pedestrian use in these locations. Consider enhancing crosswalks with additional signage; pavement markings; and brick pavers, stamped concrete, stamped asphalt, or other such material. Crosswalk improvements within public rights of way must be designed and constructed to the Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) standards. 00023 4/28/2005 4 Planning Commission Draft THE PLAN FOR CHESTERFIELD The Chester Plan Limitations and Opportunities One limitation, as true for most construction projects, to the development of a pedestrian network in the Chester Plan area is financial. Implementation of a pedestrian network could be provided through development and/or public read projects. Citizen action will be necessary if the pedestrian network is to be implemented. Some citizen actions that could assist in the development of the network are: grant writing, education, or seeking property donations. Other limitations to the development of new trails and sidewalks could include the provision of right of way, particularly in areas that are already developed, and various concerns of adjacent property owners. While a pedestrian network is broadly supported in concept, there may be areas that are shown for improvement where a sidewalk or trail may not be desired based on more detailed information. The pedestrian network is anticipated to be comprised of a combination of sidewalks and trails. Generally, trails are better suited to locations adjacent to creeks or located in Resource Protection Areas. Sidewalks are better suited to locations along roadways. Goal 4 Ensure that office and commercial development and redevelopment within the Route 10 corridor and the Nei,qhborhood Mixed Use area promote and enhance the visual appeal of the community. Citizens participated in a visual preference survey as part of the plan process. The results of the survey confirmed their interest and commitment to a village or town style streetscape and traditional architectural styles, particularly Arts and Crafts, Federal, Georgian, and Colonial Revival styles. In many areas, particularly the area designated on the plan for Neighborhood Mixed Use, the Route 10 corridor and the Chester Road corridor, citizens were particularly concerned about the architectural appearance of new development and redevelopment, and its transition to existing residential areas. Recommendations Adopt design guidelines for future development along the Route 10 corridor from Route 1 to Chalkley Road. The design guidelines should replace and simplify the existing ordinances for the area, allowing flexibility where needed and improving architectural standards. Utilize the new design standards to maintain a distinctive edge between the village core area and the outskirts of the village. Higher densities and scales, along with reduced setbacks, should be limited to the area along Route 10 bounded by Womack and Osborne Roads. Existing standards for the area east of Osborne Road address density and scale issues for that area. Standards for the area west of Womack Road should be based upon the county Emerging Growth standards, with additional architectural standards. While the plan map is parcel specific and makes recommendations regarding transitions between commercial, office and residential land uses, there may be parcels directly adjacent to these transitions that would be appropriate for the adjacent land use. Non-residential land development that includes land designated on the plan for residential uses that are immediately adjacent to land designated for non-residential uses may be appropriate under certain circumstances. These include: adjacent lots are combined to create better transitions to adjacent residential land uses, access is limited to the parcel designated for non-residential uses on the comprehensive plan, and topographical features or natural breaks are used for transitions. Limitations and Opportunities Existing zoning and land use patterns within the study area reflect a mix of office and residential zoning and land uses, with some commercial uses and several public/semi-public uses along Route 10. 4/28/2005 5 Planning Commission Draft 00023 THE PLAN FOR CHESTERFIELD The Chester Plan Opportunities exist to preserve and enhance the existing function and visual appeal of Route 10 and the village commercial area as the center and focus for social activity and community identity within Chester. Goal 5 Adopt an ordinance requirin.q the use of the public water and wastewater systems. Recommendation · Amend the Subdivision and Utilities Ordinances to require mandatory connection to the public water and wastewater systems except for large lot residential development. Limitations and opportunities: The Chester Plan area has adequate water and wastewater facilities to serve existing and future development. So that future development and redevelopment are orderly and predictable the plan recommends that new development be served by the public water and wastewater systems. Subsequently, the Subdivision and Utilities Ordinances will be amended to require use of the public water and wastewater systems. Goal 6 Provide a safe, efficient and cost effective transportation system: The County Thorou,qhfare Plan, which was originally adopted by the Board of Supervisors in 1989, identifies right-of-way classifications of existing roads, and right-of-way classifications and general alignments of future roads. As development occurs inside the Chester Plan area, in other areas of the County, and in the region, road improvements will be needed in this area to accommodate increasing traffic volumes and reduce congestion. Recommendations Adopt the Thorou,qhfare Plan as shown, including: (1) the reduction of West Hundred Road from a 90 foot wide Major Arterial to a 70 foot wide Collector between Branders Bridge Road and Route 10; (2) the deletion of the proposed Collector from Centralia Road south to the proposed North/South Arterial that is within the County-owned 100 foot wide right-of-way along the old Seaboard Coast Line railroad; and, (3)the deletion of the proposed Major Arterial ("Hopkins Road Realigned") from just south of the Route 288 overpass to Chester Road across from Hamlin Creek Parkway. Use the zoning and development review processes to encourage development proposals to conform to the Thorou,qhfare Plan with respect to the construction of road improvements and the dedication of rights-of-way. Use the zoning and development review process to encourage development proposals to include mitigation of their traffic impacts by providing road improvements and controlling the number of direct accesses to major arterial and collector roads. · As improvements are provided on roads identified in the County's Bikeway Plan, consider incorporating bicycle facilities. Limitations and Opportunities In the Chester Plan area, existing development limits the opportunities to plan for additional new roads. The limited potential for new roads in this area of the county will make it necessary for existing roads to carry the majority of the traffic generated by future development. Without improvements, these roadways will become congested. 4/28/2005 6 Planning Commission Draft O O O THE PLAN FOR CHESTERFIELD The Chester Plan The current Six-Year Improvement Program includes three road improvement projects within the Chester Plan area: (1) Branders Bridge Road - shoulder improvements, from Carver Heights Drive to Bradley Bridge Road (scheduled for Spring 2007); (2) Chalkley Road - improve the curve south of Centralia Road, between Gravel Neck Road and Inge Wood Circle (scheduled for Spring 2006); and, (3) Hopkins Road - improve sight distance in the curve west of Old Lane (scheduled for Spring 2005). Staff recommends that two new roadway facilities remain on the Thoroughfare Plan in the Chester Plan area: 1. North/South Collector - this roadway would provide a new connection between Route 10 and Ecoff Avenue. This road is anticipated to be constructed in conjunction with future development. It is recommended to have a right-of-way width of 70 feet. 2. North/South Arterial - In the eady 1980's, the County acquired from the then Seaboard Coast Line Railroad a right-of-way, approximately 100 feet in width, from Chester Road to Branders Bridge Road. The alignment of this North/South Arterial falls within the abandoned railroad right-of-way. It is unlikely that this roadway will be completed in conjunction with future development. Public funds will have to be provided for its completion. Note: The land use plan identifies a pedestrian network adjacent to this right of way. The pedestrian facility could be provided as sidewalks along the road or as a trail outside of the 100 foot wide right of way. If the Chester area was to "build-out" in accordance with the land use recommendations of the existing 1989 Chester Villa,qe Plan, another 4,345 residential units (single family, apartments, and townhouses) and 786,750 additional square feet of commercial and office development could result. This future development could add approximately 55,425 vehicle trips to area roads each day. The recommendations of this draft Plan could result in 715 fewer residential units, and 12,610 more square feet of commercial and office development at "build-out". This level of development could result in approximately 4,900 fewer vehicle trips each day than "build-out" under the current Plan. The County's Bikeway Plan was adopted by the Board of Supervisors in 1989. The purpose of the Bikeway Plan is "to designate a coordinated system of bike facilities to connect County and State parks with other high bike traffic generators such as schools." In the Chester Plan area, Route 10, Osborne Road, Branders Bridge Road, and Happy Hill Road are designated in the Bikeway Plan as part of the "bikeway network". In accordance with the Bikeway Plan, staff will consider including bike facilities along these roads in conjunction with future road improvements. The Virginia Department of Rail and Public Transportation (VDRPT) has High Speed Rail environmental studies underway that may effect the Chester Plan area. The South East High Speed Rail would utilize a corridor connecting Washington, D.C. to Charlotte, North Carolina via Richmond. The South Hampton Roads High Speed Rail would utilize a High Speed Rail corridor connecting Richmond and South Hampton Roads. Possible routes for these corridors ara the existing or abandoned CSX rail line through Chester. A final decision will be made upon completion of the Tier II study. The Board has taken a position opposing the use of the abandoned rail line. The county continues to work with the VDRPT on the specifics of the rail corridor through Chesterfield County. Staff will continue to evaluate development proposals and recommend that mitigating road improvements are provided that will address their traffic impacts. The improvements may include the construction of new roads, right-of-way dedications, pavement widening and construction of turn lanes, horizontal and vertical alignment improvements, control of access, and ditch relocation to provide adequate shoulders. The eastern part of the plan is within the Jefferson Davis Highway Enterprise Zone. Based on the Board of Supervisors policy regarding development within the Enterprise Zone, road improvements are not required by the county. Road improvements may be required by the Virginia Department of Transportation. 4/28/2005 7 Planning Commission Draft THE PLAN FOR CHESTERFIELD The Chester Plan Land Use Cate.qories Residential (1 dwelling per acre or less) Residential (1.5 dwelling per acre or less) Residential (2.5 dwellings per acre or less) Residential (7.0 dwellings per acre or more) Residences, and places of worship, schools, parks and other similar public and semi-public facilities. Note: In this category, new multi-family development (including apartments, townhouses, as well as individual buildings with multiple units) is not appropriate. Conservation/Recreation Under circumstances that ensure compatibility with existing and/or anticipated area residential development, publicly owned land or land held in public or private trust for the purpose of preserving and promoting its natural function, character and/or historic significance (such as floodplains, wildlife habitat, open space, conservation areas, historic sites, etc.). Public access for recreational purposes may also be appropriate. Generally such areas should follow the line of the resource protection area, or extend 300 feet landward from the edge of a stream or river, whichever is the greater distance. Should such land be transferred to private ownership or other uses, the appropriate uses would be those that are compatible with surrounding existing or anticipated development, as reflected by existing land uses, zoning, and/or the recommended land uses on the adopted Plan. Public Publicly owned properties (county, state and federal), including schools, parks, cemeteries and other public facilities, as well as underutilized or vacant land. Should such land be redeveloped for other uses, the appropriate uses would be those that are compatible with surrounding existing or anticipated development, as reflected by existing land uses, zoning, and/or the recommended land uses on the adopted Plan. Note: In this category, new multi-family development (including apartments, townhouses, as well as individual buildings with multiple units) is not appropriate. Residential development should be comprised of single family homes of densities up to four units to the acre, duplexes, or age restricted developments such as townhouses or zero lot line homes if designed to look like single family homes. Neighborhood Mixed Use A mix of neighborhood scale retail and service, professional and administrative offices, along with residential developments of varying densities. Supporting, neighborhood-scale retail and service uses would be appropriate when part of a mixed use development of aggregated acreage under a unified plan of development. R-MF, R-TH, 0-2, C-2 Note: Development in this area should be designed and modeled on the scale, architecture, and pattern of development of a traditional village center or small community downtown. Higher densities than currently exist are not precluded, but should be designed to add to the village feel and appearance. Parking should be consolidated within projects and located to the rear of the development, locating buildings closer to the roadway to facilitate the 'downtown' appearance of development. Encouraged architectural styles are Arts and Crafts, Federal, Georgian, and Colonial Revival. Office/Residential Mixed Use Professional and administrative offices, along with residential developments of varying densities. Supporting retail and service uses would be appropriate when part of a mixed use center of aggregated acreage under a unified plan of development and when located with access to intersecting transportation corridors. R (various), 0-2 Note: In this category, new multi-family development (including apartments, townhouses, as well as individual buildings with multiple units) is not appropriate. Residential development should be comprised 4/28/2005 8 Planning Commission Draft THE PLAN FOR CHESTERFIELD The Chester Plan of single family homes of densities up to four units to the acre, duplexes, or age restricted developments such as townhouses or zero lot line homes if designed to look like single family homes. Community Mixed Use Community scale commercial uses, including shopping centers, service and office uses that serve community wide trade areas. Residential uses of various types and densities may be appropriate if part of a larger mixed use project and the design is integrated with other uses. C-3 Note: In this category, new multi-family development (including apartments, townhouses, as well as individual buildings with multiple units) is not appropriate. Residential development should be comprised of single family homes of densities up to four units to the acre, duplexes, or age restricted developments such as townhouses or zero lot line homes if designed to look like single family homes. Commercial General commercial uses, including automobile oriented uses and light industrial uses. Residential uses of various types and densities may be appropriate if part of a larger mixed use project. C-5 Note: In this category, new multi-family development (including apartments, townhouses, as well as individual buildings with multiple units) is not appropriate. Residential development should be comprised of single family homes of densities up to four units to the acre, duplexes, or age restricted developments such as townhouses or zero lot line homes if designed to look like single family homes. Map Notes: Note 1: More intense residential uses such as age restricted townhouses and zero-lot line developments may be appropriate in this location if sufficient size and shape of property is aggregated to ensure a quality development with appropriate transition from the existing commercial to the adjacent single-family neighborhood and adequate access is provided. 000; 36 4/28/2005 9 Planning Commission Draft THE PLAN FOR C~STE~IELD The Chester Plan Major Roads Streets Streams Lakes/Ponds Parcels [-~ Residential: 1.0 unit/acre or less ~_~1 Residential: 1.5 units/acm or less ~ Residential: 2.5 units/acre or less l Residential: 7.0 units/acre or more ~ Neighborhood Mixed Use ~ Office/Residential Mixed Use Land Use 1 Community Mixed Use ~ Conservation/Recreation 1 Commercial 1 Public 4/28/2005 10 000;837 Planning Commission Draft THE PLAN FOR CHESTERFIELD The Chester Plan Proposed Thoroughfare Plan Umited Aooess Intemhamge NUmited (200~) E)dstJng Aooess /' ~? MaJorArbirial (t20;200') E~sting ~ ,4~ M-jor Arteri"d (90') Existing / I ~dorArtedui (SO') Proposed Colleotor (70*) Exiseng /%~ Colleotor (70*) Proposed Chester Plan ~-~ Boundary 4/28/2005 11 000238 Planning Commission Draft Ar~ Affitiate of Media Geae~a~ AdvertisiaS Affida'~t P. O~ 8o× 85333 hmond, Vi~ in ia 23293-0001 (8O4) O49~00 07/7~0/2005 l~te ~de ~$criptioa Ad Size Total L:ost ] 0W20/~005 )2'1 TAKNN©T~CRTAk~RMOT{f:RTHAT'FHRF~©ARD© ZOO x 76¢0 ~_51N~6 THE RICHi~OND T]MES-DISP This ~s to certify that the attached was published by Rich~ Ti~es~spatch~ ~c~ ~ R~ch~ond~ state of Vkg~a, on the fo~]~w~n~ dateS: 07/13/2005 07/20/2005 The first ~nseA~oa being given .... Newspa~r reference: 2t 18091 Sworn to and subscribed before State of V~rcnia C~y of Rie~m°nd ~Y C~mm iss~on expires Supe OTAR¥ ?USL C ?OMMONWEALN OF VIRGINIA MY ¢OMM EPS JAf'¢~ 3~ 20Pc CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page I of ~ Meetin~l Date: July 27, 2005 Item Number: 17.D. Subiect: A Public Hearing to Consider Amending Section 17-5 of the Code of the County of Chesterfield, 1997, as Amended Relating to Subdivision Plat Restriction, Approval and Exemption Provisions County Administrator's Comments: //~~(~ County Administrator: Board Action Requested: The Planning Commission and staff recommend that the Board of Supervisors approve this amendment to the Code of the County of Chesterfield. Summary of Information: The Planning Commission held their public hearing on the attached subdivision ordinance amendment on April 19, 2005. No one spoke at the public hearing. Following the public hearing, the Planning Commission unanimously recommended approval of the attached subdivision ordinance amendment. This is an amendment to Section 17-5 of the Subdivision Ordinance to clarify the Subdivision Ordinance by creating a cross-reference in Section 17-5 (which restricts the recordation, transfer, and sale of subdivisions without an approved plat) to advise the reader of the availability of an exception to these restrictions as provided under Section 17-44 of the Subdivision Ordinance. These ordinance sections are primarily used for the purpose of transferring ownership of commercial, office or industrial property prior to the site plan review process. Also, it is sometimes used to transfer larger tracts of residential land from a holding company to a development company prior to the regular subdivision review process. Preparer: Kirkland A. Turner Title: Director of Planninq Attachments: Yes ~ No # 000239 AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE CODE OF THE COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD, 1997, AS AMENDED, BY AMENDING AND RE-ENACTING SECTION 17-5 RELATING TO SUBDIVISION PLAT RESTRICTION, APPROVAL AND EXEMPTION PROVISIONS BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County: (1) That Section 17-5 of the Code of the Coun~ of Chesterfield, 1997, as amended, is amended and re-enacted to read as follows: Sec. 17-5. Transfer or sale without approved plat prohibited. No person shall subdivide land without making and recording a plat of the subdivision and without fully complying with the provisions of this chapter of the Code. No plat of any subdivision shall be recorded unless and until it has been submitted to and approved by the planning commission or director of planning, except as provided for in section 17-44. No person shall sell or transfer any lot or parcel of an unrecorded subdivision, before a plat has been duly approved and recorded in the circuit court clerk's office. (2) That this ordinance shall become effective immediately upon adoption. 000240 P, O. Box 8§333 Richmond, Virginia 23293 ~scdption Ad Size Tota[ ~st ~ ATTACH HERE ~ed~a General OperatiOr~s, Inc, Publisher of THE R]CH~ON D TidES-DiSPATCH This is to cert~ that the attached TARq~, N'(}THiRTAKR R?hmond, State of V~rfnia, o~ the following dates: 07/~3/2005 07/20/2005 The firsl ir~se~ierl bain9 9ivan,.. Newspa~r reference: 2] 13389 SwOrn to and subscribed before ©7I~ %t20{N State of Virginia ~y Cammissiar~ expires K~MBERLY HARRIS NoTARy PUBLIC COM~A©NWEALTH OF VIRGINIA ~¥ COMM. EPS, JAN, 3t 2009 THiS iS N A ANK YOU CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page I of 2 Meetin~l Date: July 27, 2005 Item Number: I~I.F. 'Subiect: A Public Hearing to Consider Amending Sections 19-65, 19-66, 19-102, 19- 103, 19-107.1, 19-108, 19-124, 19-301, and 19-510 of the Code of the County of Chesterfield, 1997, as Amended Relating to Home Occupations County Administrator: ~ Board Action Requested: The Planning Commission and staff recommend that the Board of Supervisors approve these amendments to the Code of the County of Chesterfield. Summary of Information: The Planning Commission held their public hearing on the attached zoning ordinance amendments on April 19, 2004. One person spoke in opposition and one person spoke in favor of these amendments which concern home occupations, truck parking and tow vehicles. Following the public hearing, the Planning Commission deferred these amendments to its April 21, 2005, meeting and then to its May 17, 2005 meeting. On May 17, 2005, the Planning Commission unanimously recommended approval of the enclosed ordinance amendments. These ordinance amendments accomplish two separate tasks: (1) changing home occupations from an accessory use to a restricted use in residential and agricultural districts, revising some home occupations conditions, and adding some additional categories of businesses that may not be conducted Preparer: Kirkland A. Turner Title: Director of Plannin,q Attachments: Ycs No 000245 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 2 of 2 from the home; and (2) making truck parking a restricted use in residential districts, with specific provisions for tow vehicles Home O¢cuDations Home occupations will be moved from accessory to restricted uses. The definition of home occupation, section 19-301, will be amended to delete the specific listed restrictions, which are instead moved into the restrictions for the home occupation restricted use. Additional restrictions for home occupations are proposed as follows: to permit only one home occupation per dwelling unit, to permit non family member employees, to permit certain external alterations to the property, to allow some commodity storage, to restrict equipment storage, to restrict tow vehicle parking as part of a home occupation and to restrict the number of clients on the property at one time. Finally, the amendments will prohibit dance studios, motor vehicle repair, motor vehicle painting or body work, motor vehicle detailing, private clubs and trash collections as home occupations. Commercial Vehicle Parkin~ Truck parking in R, R-TH, R-MF Districts will be deleted from section 19- 510 and, instead, parking commercial trucks, commercial vehicles, public service vehicles or school buses will be made a restricted use in those districts, subject to weight and axle restrictions. There are also proposed restrictions specific to tow vehicles, including allowable weight and type of vehicle, lot size and need for screening, and load restrictions. 000246 AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE CODE OF THE COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD, 1997, AS AMENDED, BY AMENDING AND RE-ENACTING SECTION 19-65, 19-66, 19-102, 19-103, 19-107.1, 19-108, 19-124, 19-301 AND 19-510 RELATING TO HOME OCCUPATIONS BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County: (1) That Sections 19-65, 19-66, 19-102, 19-103, 19-107.1,19-108, 19-124, 19-301 and 19-510 of the Code of the County of ChestertSeld, 1997, as amended, are amended and re- enacted to read as follows: Sec. 19-65. Uses permitted with certain restrictions. The following uses shall be permitted in the R-88 District subject to compliance with the following conditions and other applicable standards of this chapter. If these restrictions cannot be met, these uses may be allowed by conditional use, subject to section 19-13: ooo (e) Home occupation, provided that: .(J.) No more than one home occupation shall be permitted within each dwelling unit. No employees shall be permitted to work on the premises other than family member employees that live on the premises, The use is within a dwelling, accessory_ structure or both provided that the total area for the use does not exceed 25% of the floor of the dwelling or 250 square feet, whichever is greater, The use is clearly incidental and secondary_ to the use of the property for dwelling purposes and no external alterations, which would cause the premises to differ from its residential character by the use of colors, materials, lighting, or construction, are permitted, (5) No commodity is stored or sold on the premises except for light inventory_, No more than one vehicle and one single axle trailer not exceeding 13 feet in length and 3,200 pounds used in conjunction with the home occupation may be parked on the premises. No equipment shall be stored outside the dwelling or accessory structure that would indicate that a business is being conducted on site except for equipment stored on the vehicle or trailer used in conjunction with the business. The vehicle and equipment for a home occupation shall be parked on the premises where the home occupation is conducted, but a trailer must be parked, except for loading or unloading, either in the rear yard or so that its view is screened from adjacent properties or public roads. A vehicle used for towing shall not be permitted to have a vehicle in tow or on its flatbed while it is parked 2723:68504.4 3 Revised 05/25/05 4:53 PM 000 ~J:~7 on the premises, and No assembly or group instruction shall be permitted with a home occupation. Individual instruction on a one to one basis is permitted. Only one client may be on the property at any one time. (f) Parking and storage of any commercial truck, commercial vehicle, public service vehicle or school bus provided that no such vehicle shall exceed 6,000 pounds or have more than two axles, except tow vehicles may exceed 6,000 pounds or have more than two axles. The restriction in this subsection shall not apply to (i) trucks, vehicles or buses on the premises while loading or unloading; or (ii) trucks or vehicles parked on a farm where the parking is incidental to the farming use being conducted on the property. _0.) Parking of no more than one tow vehicle, provided: The vehicle shall be of wrecker or roll back body style. b_ The vehicle shall not exceed 16,000 pounds. The vehicle shall be located on a lot three acres or greater or shall be parked under a carport or within a garage or shall be parked so that its view is screened from adiacent properties or public roads. d_ The vehicle shall not be permitted to have a vehicle in tow or on its flatbed. Sec. 19-66. Accessory uses, buildings and structures. The following accessory uses, buildings and structures shall be permitted in the R-88 District: OOO ¢-'-) (b) Tennis courts and similar recreational facilities. (-d-) ~ Swimming pools and adjoining deck areas; provided that no swimming pool wall shall be located within six feet of an adjacent lot or parcel nor in a required front or comer side yard. ¢Y) (d) Temporary buildings or trailers devoted to purposes incidental to construction activities taking place on the premises; provided that such buildings or trailers shall be removed upon completion or abandonment of the work. Signs. Other accessory uses, buildings and structures not otherwise prohibited, customarily accessory and incidental to any permitted use. OOO 2723:68504.4 Revised 05/25/05 4:53 PM 0001 45 Sec. 19-102. Uses permitted with certain restrictions. The following uses shall be permitted in the R-TH District subject to compliance with the following conditions and other applicable standards of this chapter. If these restrictions cannot be met, these uses may be allowed by conditional use, subject to section 19-13: ooo (e) Home occupation, provided that: (1) No more than one home occupation shall be permitted within each dwelling unit. (2) No employees shall be permitted to work on the premises other than family member employees that live on the premises, (3) The use is within a dwelling, accessory structure or both provided that the total area for the use does not exceed 25% of the floor of the dwelling or 250 square feet, whichever is greater, (4) The use is clearly incidental and secondary to the use of the property for dwelling purposes and no external alterations, which would cause the premises to differ from its residential character by the use of colors, materials, lighting, or construction, are permitted, (5) No commodity is stored or sold on the premises except for light inventory_, (6) No more than one vehicle and one single axle trailer not exceeding 13 feet in length and 3,200 pounds used in coniunction with the home occupation may be parked on the premises. No equipment shall be stored outside the dwelling or accessory_ structure that would indicate that a business is being conducted on site except for equipment stored on the vehicle or trailer used in conjunction with the business. The vehicle and equipment for a home occupation shall be parked on the premises where the home occupation is conducted, but a trailer must be parked, except for loading or unloading, either in the rear yard or so that its view is screened from adjacent properties or public roads. A vehicle used for towing shall not be permitted to have a vehicle in tow or on its flatbed while it is parked on the premises, and No assembly or group instruction shall be permitted with a home occupation. Individual instruction on a one to one basis is permitted. Only one client may be on the property at any one time. (f) Parking and storage of any commercial truck, commercial vehicle, public service vehicle or school bus provided that no such vehicle shall exceed 6,000 pounds or have more than two axles, except tow vehicles may exceed 6,000 pounds or have more than two axles. The restriction in this subsection shall not apply to (i) trucks, vehicles or buses on the premises while loading or unloading; or (ii) trucks or vehicles parked on a farm where the parking is incidental to the farming 2723:68504.4 5 Revised 05/25/05 4:53 PM 0002Z~:9 use being conducted on the property. (1) Parking of no more than one tow vehicle, provided: ao The vehicle shall be of wrecker or roll back body style. b_ The vehicle shall not exceed 16,000 pounds. The vehicle shall be located on a lot three acres or greater or shall be parked under a carport or within a garage or shall be parked so that its view is screened from adjacent properties or public roads. d_. The vehicle shall not be permitted to have a vehicle in tow or on its flatbed. ooo Sec. 19-103. Accessory uses, buildings and structures. The following accessory uses, buildings and structures shall be permitted in the R-TH District: ooo ~-) (b) Tennis courts and similar recreational facilities. (-~ (c) Swimming pools and adjoining deck areas; provided that no swimming pool wall shall be located within six feet of an adjacent lot or parcel nor in a required front or comer side yard. (-e-) (d) Temporary buildings or trailers devoted to purposes incidental to construction activities taking place on the premises; provided that such buildings or trailers shall be removed upon completion or abandonment of the work. ~ (e) Signs. (-g-) (f) Other accessory uses, buildings and structures not otherwise prohibited, customarily accessory and incidental to any permitted use. ooo Sec. 19-107.1. Uses permitted with certain restrictions. The following uses shall be permitted in the R-MF District subject to compliance with the following conditions and other applicable standards of this chapter. If these restrictions cannot be met, these uses may be allowed by conditional use, subject to section 19-13: ooo (d) Home occupation, provided that: (1) No more than one home occupation shall be permitted within each dwelling unit. (2) No employees shall be permitted to work on the premises other than family 2723:68504.4 6 000250 Revised 05/25/054:53 PM member employees that live on the premises, (3) The use is within a dwelling, accessory structure or both provided that the total area for the use does not exceed 25% of the floor of the dwelling or 250 square feet, whichever is greater, (4) The use is clearly incidental and secondary to the use of the property for dwelling purposes and no external alterations, which would cause the premises to differ from its residential character by the use of colors, materials, lighting, or construction, are permitted, (5) No commodity is stored or sold on the premises except for light inventory, (6) No more than one vehicle and one single axle trailer not exceeding 13 feet in length and 3,200 pounds used in conjunction with the home occupation may be parked on the premises. No equipment shall be stored outside the dwelling or accessory structure that would indicate that a business is being conducted on site except for equipment stored on the vehicle or trailer used in conjunction with the business. The vehicle and equipment for a home occupation shall be parked on the premises where the home occupation is conducted, but a trailer must be parked, except for loading or unloading, either in the rear yard or so that its view is screened from adjacent properties or public roads. A vehicle used for towing shall not be permitted to have a vehicle in tow or on its flatbed while it is parked on the premises, and (7) No assembly or group instruction shall be permitted with a home occupation. Individual instruction on a one to one basis is permitted. Only one client may be on the property at any one time. (e) Parking and storage of any commercial truck, commercial vehicle, public service vehicle or school bus provided that no such vehicle shall exceed 6,000 pounds or have more than two axles, except tow vehicles may exceed 6,000 pounds or have more than two axles. The restriction in this subsection shall not apply to (i) trucks, vehicles or buses on the premises while loading or unloading; or (ii) trucks or vehicles parked on a farm where the parking is incidental to the farming use being conducted on the property. Parking of no more than one tow vehicle, provided: The vehicle shall be of wrecker or roll back body style. The vehicle shall not exceed 16,000 pounds. The vehicle shall be located on a lot three acres or greater or shall be parked under a carport or within a garage or shall be parked so that its view is screened from adjacent properties or public roads. O00ZSl 2723:68504.4 Revised 05/25/05 4:53 PM do The vehicle shall not be permitted to have a vehicle in tow or on its flatbed. ooo Sec. 19-108. Accessory uses, buildings and structures. The following accessory uses, buildings and structures shall be permitted in the R-MF District: ooo (-c-) Lb.) Recreational facilities as required for the project and that primarily serve the surrounding residential community. (~) (c) Management office and maintenance buildings for the project. (~) (ct) Temporary buildings or trailers devoted to purposes incidental to construction activities taking place on the premises; provided that such buildings or trailers shall be removed upon completion or abandonment of such work. (-0 (e) Signs. (-g) (f) Other accessory uses, buildings and structures not otherwise prohibited, customarily accessory and incidental to any permitted use. ooo Sec. 19-124. Uses permitted with certain restrictions. The following uses shall be permitted in the A District subject to compliance with the following conditions and other applicable standards of this chapter. If the following restrictions cannot be met, these uses may be allowed by conditional use, subject to section 19-13: ooo (e) Home occupation, provided that: (1) No more than one home occupation shall be permitted within each dwelling unit. No employees shall be permitted to work on the premises other than family member employees that live on the premises, The use is within a dwelling, accessory structure or both provided that the total area for the use does not exceed 25% of the floor of the dwelling or 250 square feet, whichever is greater, The use is clearly incidental and secondary to the use of the property for dwelling purposes and no external alterations, which would cause the premises to differ from its residential character by the use of colors, materials, lighting, or construction, are permitted, 2723:68504.4 Revised 05/25/05 4:53 PM (5) No commodity is stored or sold on the premises except for light inventory, No more than one vehicle and one single axle trailer not exceeding 13 feet in length and 3,200 pounds used in conjunction with the home occupation may be parked on the premises. No equipment shall be stored outside the dwelling or accessory structure that would indicate that a business is being conducted on site except for equipment stored on the vehicle or trailer used in conjunction with the business. The vehicle and equipment for a home occupation shall be parked on the premises where the home occupation is conducted, but a trailer must be parked, except for loading or unloading, either in the rear yard or so that its view is screened from adjacent properties or public roads. A vehicle used for towing shall not be permitted to have a vehicle in tow or on its flatbed while it is parked on the premises, and Sec. 19-301. No assembly or group instruction shall be permitted with a home occupation. Individual instruction on a one to one basis is permitted. Only one client may be on the property at any one time. 000 Definitions. OOO Home occupation: Any occupation, profession, enterprise or activity conducted ~ ............ t.~o fa.mi!) ...................· . . . cf a ' on *~-.,,,~ ..... v.,,....,.~o;°~° which is incidental and secondly to the use of the presses as a dwelling, including but not li~ted to the home office of a member of a recognized or licensed profession, such as an attorney, physician, dentist, cegified massage therapist as defined in County Code ~ 15-91, musician, mist, real estate salesperson or broker, or engineer~: Pe~tted home occupations shall not include animal hospitals or kennels, beauty p~lors, b~bershops, dance studios, motor vehicle rep~r, motor vehicle p~nting or body work, motor vehicle detailing, nursing homes, convalescent homes, mst homes, private clubs, tourist homes, ~ash collection or si~l~ establishments offehng services to the general public. OOO 000953 9 2723:68504.4 Revised 05/25/05 4:53 PM Sec. 19-510. Restrictions and limitations--Agricultural, residential, residential townhouse~ multi-family residential, manufactured homes. (a) Parking and storing recreational equipment in R, R-TH, MH and R-MF Districts: (1) In all MH-2, MH-3, and R Districts, only two items of recreational equipment may be parked on a zoning lot for each dwelling unit thereon, outside of a totally enclosed building. Further, all recreational equipment shall be parked or stored in a rear yard, except for loading or unloading, and shall be set back at least ten feet from the rear lot lines and five feet from the side lot lines. No trailer or vehicle shall have its wheels removed except for repair purposes. (2) No recreational equipment shall be used for living or business purposes or connected to utility services except for maintenance purposes. (3) In R-TH, and R-MF Districts, parking and storing recreational equipment shall be prohibited unless a common storage area(s) is (are) provided for the parking. Parking spaces for recreational equipment and/or vehicles shall be in addition to that required for parking private vehicles. The storage area(s) shall be effectively screened from view. ~ (b) P~ng ~eas for five or more vehicles on lots in A, R, ~ and R-TH ~stdcts, which ~e not used for residential pu~oses, shall confo~ to the p~ng requirements as though the propeay were located in an O, C or I Distdct. (2) That this ordinance shall become effective immediately upon adoption. 2723:68504.4 10 Revised 05/25/05 4:53 PM 000254 Au Affiliate of ~'~edia Ger~era~ P~ O, 8o× 85333 Richmond, V~inia 23293-0001 (8~) ~9~00 lDate Code ~scription Ad Size Tota~ ~st pu b lisher of THE RICH~ON 07/13/2005 07/20/2005 The first insertion being given .... ~?/~ Newsier reference: 21150d9 S~ CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page I of I Meetin~l Date: July/27, 2005 Item Number: 17.G. Subiect: Public Hearing to Consider Amending County Code Section 2-80 Relating to Juvenile Firefighters County Administrator: Board Action Requested: The Board is requested to hold a public hearing. Summary of Information: The 2005 General Assembly amended the state Code to permit localities to expand their junior firefighter programs to allow participation by juveniles from other localities. Currently, the County Code limits participation to juveniles who reside in the County. This restriction has prohibited some juveniles who live in surrounding localities, but who want to join as members of volunteer fire companies within the County, from obtaining the training they need to participate fully in the junior firefighting program. The Board is requested to set a public hearing for July 27, 2005 to consider amending County Code § 2-80 to (i) eliminate the requirement that junior firefighters be residents of the County and (ii) clarify that those juveniles can seek certification to participate fully in the junior firefighter program. Preparer: Paul W. Mauqer Title: Chief of Fire & EMS 0623: 69471.1 (69155.1) Attachments: Yes ~ No 0002 $ AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE CODE OF THE COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD, 1997, AS AMENDED, BY ADDING SECTION 2-80 RELATING TO PARTICIPATION BY MINORS IN VOLUNTEER FIRE COMPANY ACTIVITIES BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County: (1) That Section 2-80 of the Code of the County of Chesterfield, 1997, as amended, is added to read as follows: Sec. 2-80. Participation by minors in volunteer fire company activities. Pursuant to the authority of Code of Virginia, § 40.1-79.1, the county hereby authorizes any minor 16 years of age or older who resides is a member of a volunteer fire company within the county, with parental or legal guardian approval, to. ..... ~ .... ~,u .... ~ ~,,,.., :~ .. -~,~.,~,~ ~, .... ~,,-,~. ~,: ............... ~,4~a .... ~. ~:.,.~. ~.~o ~.~.~. (i) to seek certification under National Fire Protection Association NFPA 1001, Level One, fire fighter standards, as administered by the Virginia Department of Fire Programs; and (ii) to work with or participate fully in all activities of such volunteer fire company, provided such minor has attained certification under NFPA 1001, level one, firefighter standards and subject to any restrictions that may be imposed by the volunteer fire department or the Chesterfield Fire/EMS Department. The certification record and consent for each participant shall be kept on file in the office of the Chesterfield Fire/EMS Department. 2) That this ordinance shall become effective immediately upon adoption. 0623:69155.1 (This ~s not a b~L P]ea~ pay f~m ~nvo~) P.O. Box 85~3 Richmond, Vi~ irds 23293.0001 (804) ('17t?0/20(N Code ~scrytion Ad Size Tota~ Cost 07/201700~ ~ 2 ~ TAKR 'NOTICRTAKR NCYFICR THAT THR Rf}AR F) HERE IVledia General Operations, I~c. P~blisher of THE R~CH~ON D TI~ES-D~SPATCH This is to certify that the a~ached TA-KR NC')T~CRTA KF. NOIIC~ was publ~sh~ by R~chmo~d ~mes~Dis~tch, ~c. ~ the Ci~ of R~ch~oRd, State of VPcnia, o~ the fo~l~w~ng dates: 07/13/2005 07/20/2005 The first i~se~ior~ being given.. Newsier reference: 2 ] ]4006 Sworn to a~d S~bsodbed before me this State of Vkginia C~ry of RichmOnd ~y CommCS~on expires KIE¢~BERLY HARRIS NOTARY PUBU¢ ;O~P¢IONWEALTH OF ~,~RG COMM. EPS. JAN, 31. 2009 THIS iS NOT A BILL. PLEASE PAY FRO~ iNVOICE. HANK 'YOU CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page I of 2 Meetin~l Date: July 27, 2005 Item Number: ll.H. Subiect: Public Hearing to Consider Amendments to Sections 14-14 Through 14-16 of the County Code Regulating the Use of Pneumatic Guns in the County County Administrator's Comments: /~~~,,~J ~/~h~ County Administrator: ~ Board Action Requested: The Board is requested to hold a public hearing on July 27, 2005, to consider amendments to various sections of the County Code regulating the use of pneumatic guns in the County. Summary of Information: During the work session following the 2004 General Assembly, the Board requested staff to coordinate with the police department updates to the County Code pertaining to the use of pneumatic guns consistent with recent State enabling legislation. The proposed amendments are consistent with State law and are supported by the police department. Particular attention has been paid to the definitions in the County Code, which have been updated to reflect the proliferation of "paintball guns", which may be used for recreational purposes. The proposed amendments specifically address the use of these types of pneumatic guns and further regulate the training requirements for minors, particularly those under the age of 16, who might use pneumatic guns. The proposed amendments also Preparer: Col. Carl R. Baker Title: Chief of Police 68837.1 Attachments: Yes ~ No # oooas? CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 2 of 2 address safety issues, for example, the use of protective eyewear when paintball guns are used. The ordinance will maintain the existing limitations on the use of pneumatic guns in proximity to public roads, parks and schools. The proposed ordinance amendments do not affect the use of firearms or the proper utilization of established target or shooting ranges. The Board is requested to adopt the ordinance amendments after public hearing. A copy of the proposed ordinance is attached. 000;~$$ AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE CODE OF THE COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD, 1997, AS AMENDED, BY AMENDING AND RE-ENACTING SECTIONS 14-14, 14-15 and 14-16 RELATING TO DISCHARGING PNEUMATIC GUNS AND PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County: (1) That Sections 14-14, 14-15 and 14-16 of the Code of the County of Chesterfield, 1997, as amended, are amended and re-enacted to read as follows: Sec. 14-14. Same-~A'.'rguns Pneumatic guns generally. (a) The following words and phrases, when used in Sections 14-14, 14-15 and 14-16, this s~io~, shall have the following meanings: n: ........ k,, .u~ n,~,~,~. , ,-,r ~,~ ..... .~'~o~'~'". Pneumatic gun: Any implement designed gun, that will expel a BB or a pellet by action of pneumatic pressure, including, but not limited to a paintball gun that expels by action of pneumatic pressure plastic balls filled with paint for the purpose of marking the point of impact. Weapons classified as firearms are specifically excluded from this definition. Dealer: A person engaged in the business of selling, renting, lending or otherwise transferring air-gu~ pneumatic guns, projectiles, pistols, revolvers or rifles. Minor: A person under the age of 18 years. Projectile: A fired or otherwise projected object, such as a bullet, having no capacity for self propulsion. (b) No dealer shall sell, lend, rent or otherwise transfer an pneumatic gun air-grin, or projectiles for an pneumatic gun a/~m, to any person whom the dealer knows or has reasonable cause to believe to be a minor. (c) No person shall give, sell, rent, lend or otherwise transfer any pneumatic gun air-grin, or projectiles for a~ pneumatic gun air-g-aa, to a minor, unless the relationship of parent and child, guardian and ward or adult instructor and pupil exists between the person and the minor. (d) Any person violating the provisions of this section shall be guilty of a misdemeanor punishable by a fine of not more than $500.00. 1325:68662.2 000259 Sec. 14-15. Same---Discharging pneumatic guns a~r-,- .......... ~,--~- --r'~-----~--*'~a weapons across highways, etc. (a) No person shall discharge any pneumatic gun '" ...... *'~a .......... *~ ~ on or across any street, sidewalk, alley, public road or public land of the county except on a properly constructed ~ shooting range or on other property where firearms may be discharged. (b) Commerical or private areas designated for use of pneumatic paintball guns may be established and operated for recreational use if in compliance with all other applicable laws or regulations. Equipment designed to protect the face and ears shall be provided to participants at such recreational areas, and signs must be posted to warn against entry into the paintball area by persons who are unprotected or unaware that paintball guns are in use. (c) Any person violating the provisions of this section shall be guilty of a misdemeanor punishable by a fine of not more than $500.00. Sec. 14-16. Same--Discharge of pneumatic guns a:.r er ........ ,..a e,--~, --~- ...... weapon~ by minors. (a) No person ,,.~.,.....~. a..,,.~ ..... ,-o,~ .,.c .l°., .,-.,~,, shall discharge any pneumatic gun air -.v ........ e,.-~,--v .......... ~.,., within 300 feet of the dwelling of another, a business establishment, private building, public gathering or public meeting place., "~ (b) Any minor below the age of 16 who uses of pneumatic guns on private or public property shall be supervised by a parent, guardian, or other adult supervisor approved by a parent or guardian. (c) Minors above the age of 16 may, with the written consent of a parent or guardian, use a pneumatic gun at any place designated for such use by the County or on private property with the consent of the owner. (d) Any minor, whether permitted by a parent or guardian to use a pneumatic gun or not, shall be responsible for obeying all laws, regulations and restrictions governing such use. (e) Training of minors in the use of pneumatic guns shall be done only under direct supervison of a parent, guardian, Junior Reserve Officers Training Corps instructor, or a certified instructor. Training of minors above the age of 16 may also be done without direct supervision if approved by the minor's instructor, with the permission of and under the responsibility of a parent or guardian, and in compliance with all requirements of this section. Ranges and instructors may be certified by the National Rifle Association, a state or federal agency that has developed a certification program, any service of the Department of Defense, or any person authorized by these authorities to certify ranges and instructors. 1325:68662.2 OO0 ~0 (f) Any person violating the provisions of this section shall be guilty of a misdemeanor punishable by a fine of not more than $500.00. (2) That this ordinance shall become effective immediately upon adoption. 000 6 1325:68662.2 An Affiliate of ~edi~ Ge~em] (8~) ~9~00 IDate Code Ad Size Total ~t 07/13/2005 07/20/2005 The first insertion being given .... o?/] 3/20o5 2118117 ~!~BERU¥ HARR!S NOTARY PUBUC OOMNIoNWEALTH OF V~RG!N!A2009 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page I of 2 Meetin~l Date: July 27, 2005 Item Number: 1-/.I. Subiect: Public Hearing to Consider Amendments to County Code Sections 14-9, 14-10 and 14-11 Relating to Carrying Loaded Firearms and Discharging Loaded Firearms on or Near Public Highways, Public Schools, or Public Parks County Administrator'sComments: ~'~---d~"~-,~d/ ,/~~~-'-/-~('4~ ~ Board Action Requested: The Board is requested to hold a public hearing on July 27, 2005, to consider proposed amendments to various County ordinances regulating the carrying and discharging of firearms in the County. Summary of Information' Recently, the police department evaluated the County's existing firearm ordinances. In the course of that review, it was discovered that certain provisions in the State enabling legislation regarding the possession and use of firearms were not specifically set forth in some of the County's ordinances. In discussion with representatives of the Commonwealth Attorney's office, it was concluded that these proposed revisions to the County Code would be appropriate to eliminate any ambiguity should a violation have to be prosecuted by the Commonwealth Attorney's office. Preparer: Col. Carl R. Baker Title: Chief of Police 68823.1 Attachments: Yes [-~ No # 000262 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 2 of 2 With respect to County Code Section 14-9, regarding carrying loaded firearms along public highways, the proposed amendment explicitly states that the section shall not apply to persons carrying loaded firearms in moving vehicles, or to persons acting at the time in defense of persons or property. This language is consistent with the state law. With respect to Section 14-10, regulating discharging of firearms in certain areas where the Board of Supervisors have deemed it unsafe, an exception has been provided for the discharge of a firearm for the killing of deer pursuant to Virginia Code Section 29.1-529. This exception in state law pertains to the special hunting of excessive deer populations under emergency conditions declared by the Virginia Department of Game and Inland Fisheries. This exemption shall apply on land of at least five acres that is zoned for agricultural use. With respect to Section 14-11, which regulates hunting or carrying a loaded firearm near public schools or parks, the same provision relating to the killing of deer under the conditions set forth in Virginia Code Section 29.1- 529 is also specifically set forth. The penalty provisions and the remaining provisions of these Code Sections are not affected by the proposed amendments. Again, these proposed changes are consistent with state law and are supported by the Police Department and the Commonwealth Attorney's Office. The Board is requested to adopt these amendments after the public hearing. A copy of the proposed ordinance is attached. AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE CODE OF THE COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD, 1997, AS AMENDED, BY AMENDING AND RE-ENACTING SECTIONS 14-9, 14-10 AND 14-11 RELATING TO CARRYING LOADED FIREARMS ON PUBLIC HIGHWAYS, DISCHARGING FIREARMS, HUNTING OR CARRYING LOADED FIREARMS NEAR PUBLIC SCHOOLS OR PARKS, AND PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County: (1) That Sections 14-9, 14-10 and 14-11 of the Code of the County of Chesterfield, 1997, as amended, are amended and re-enacted to read as follows: Sec. 14-9. Same - Carrying loaded firearms on public highways. (a) No person shall carry or have a loaded firearm in his possession while standing or walking on any part of a public highway within the county when such person is not authorized to hunt on the private property on both sides of the highway along which he is standing or walking. The provisions of this section shall not apply to persons carrying loaded firearms in moving vehicles, or to persons acting at the time in defense of persons or property. (b) Any person violating the provisions of this section shall be guilty of a misdemeanor punishable by a fine of not more than $100.00. Sec. 14-10. Same--Discharging firearms. (a) No person shall discharge any firearm within the county within 600 feet of a (i) dwelling of another; (ii) business establishment; (iii) public building; (iv) public gathering; or (v) public meeting place. (b) Any person violating the provisions of this section shall be punishable by a fine of not more than $1,000.00. (c) This section shall not apply to a (i) law-enforcement officer in the performance of his official duties; (ii) any person whose discharge of a firearm is justifiable or excusable at law in the protection of his life or property; (iii) the discharge of a firearm for the killing of deer pursuant to Virginia Code Section 29.1-529. This exemption shall apply on land of at least five acres that is zoned for agricultural use; or (i-ii i_x) the discharge of a firearm that is otherwise specifically authorized by law. Sec. 14-11. Same--Hunting or carrying a loaded firearm near public schools or parks. (a) No person shall shoot, hunt or attempt to hunt with a firearm within 100 yards of any property line of any county public school or county park. 000264 1325:68719.3 (b) (c) (d) (2) No person shall transport, possess or carry a loaded firearm within 100 yards of any property line of any county public school or county park. This section shall not apply to lands within a national or state park, state forest or wildlife management area. The provisions of this section shall not apply to the discharge of a firearm for the killing of deer pursuant to Virginia Code Section 29.1-529. This exemption shall apply on land of at least five acres that is zoned for agricultural use. Any person violating the provisions of this section shall be guilty of a class 4 misdemeanor. That this ordinance shall become effective immediately upon adoption. 1325:68719.3 Ar~ Affiliate of ~edi~ Genera~ Advertising Affidavit (This is not a bitl, Pba~ pay from invoi~) ?, O. ~ox 85333 Richmond, Vi~]nb (8O4) I~te ~de ~scr¥fie~ Ad Size Total Cost O?/?.O12fift% 12.1 TAHR M© FICRTAK'E NflTIC'N THAT THE g©ARD © 2.00 x 26 Of) ~27 ~ CH HERE Media General Operations, Publisher of THE RICH~ON D Ti~ES-DISPATCH This is to certify that the attached TAK~', NOTWIRTAHR N©TFtf Was published by Richmond ~mes-Dis~tch, Inc, in the City of RiChmond, State of Vbeni% o~ the following dates: 07/I3/2005 07/20/2005 The first insertion being given... Newsl~ per reference: 21 lg 112 Sworn te and subscribed before 07/1 ?,/2005 gtate of Virginia itY of Richmond By Commission expires NOIAP¢ ?IJSUC 30MMONWEALTH OF k~RGI~IA ',VIY C0~VINI. EPS. JAN~ 31 2009 T HIS IS NOT A BILL. PL~SE PAY FROM INVOICE, HANK YOU CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page I of I Meetin~l Date: July/27, 2005 Item Number: 17.J. Subiect: Public Hearing to Consider Amending County Code § 15-196 Relating to Rates for Taxi Services County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: ~/ Board Action Requested: The Board is requested to hold a public hearing and adopt the attached ordinance after public's comment. Summary of Information: The Central Region Taxicab Advisory Board (~CRTAB"), which is chaired by Mr. Barber, met on June 9, 2005 to review the existing model ordinances in effect in Chesterfield, Henrico, Richmond and Hanover. After holding a public hearing, CRTAB recommended that each locality amend the model ordinance to raise taxicab rates by 10¢ from 30¢ every 1/5 mile to 40¢ every 1/5 mile. CRTAB recommends the change to help the taxicab industry offset the rising cost of fuel and insurance. The taxicab industry has not had a rate increase since 1999. Henrico, Richmond, and Hanover are all holding public hearings in the next several months to consider the rate increase. Passage of the ordinance is anticipated in those localities. Staff recommends approval of the amendment with an effective date of October 1, the date by which the other jurisdictions will have acted. Preparer: Steven L. Micas Attachments: Ycs Title: County Attorney 0623 (00) :69472.1(69183.1) r---] No # 000266 AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE CODE OF THE COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD, 1997, AS AMENDED, BY AMENDING AND RE-ENACTING SECTION 15-196 RELATING TO RATES FOR TAXI SERVICES BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County: (1) That Section 15-196 of the Code of the County of Cheste_rfield, 1997, as amended, is amended and re-enacted to read as follows: Sec. 15-195. Rates--Generally. Except as otherwise provided in this article, it shall be unlawful for the owner or driver of any taxicab to charge a rate above or below the rates established by the board of supervisors. Same--Enumerated; special discount for elderly passengers and disabled Sec. 15-196. passengers. (a) Taxicab drivers shall charge passengers: For the first one-fifth mile... $2.50 For each succeeding one-fifth mile... 9.29 0.40 For each one minute of waiting time... 0.30 For each additional passenger over one (children six years of age or younger, when accompanying a fare-paying passenger, shall not be deemed additional passengers)... 1.00 ooo (2) That this ordinance shall become effective October 1, 2005. 0623:69183.1 0uOF 6? Adw-tisi ng Affi davit (This is not a bill P]ea~ pay f~m invoice) P. O, BOX 85~3 Richmond, Vi~ tnb 23293~0001 (804) e49-~00 ~de ~scr~ptlon Ad Size Total ~st TAKRN©T/T~RTAKRN©TffTFTHATTHRR()ARD© ~f)O X 240fl 4R6_R4 HER~ Media General Operations, Inc. P~blieher of THE RICHMOND TIME~-DISPATCH , This is to certify 'that the atlached TAKR N©TiCETAK'E N(')Tff.t was published by Richmond ~mes-D[s~tch, Inc, in the Ci~ of Richmond, State of VirgiMa, on the foil;wing dates: 07/13/2005 07/20/2005 The first insertion being given.,. News~ ~r relarence: 2114002 Sworn to and subscribed before 07/1 State of Virginia C~y of Richmond KIMBERLY HARRIS NOTARY PUBLIC t-;0MMONWEALTH OF VIR6 NtA ~v C0b~M EXPS, JAN. 3I, 2009 THIS IS NOT A E PAY FROI~ INVOICE, THANK CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page I of I Meetin~l Date: July 27, 2005 Item Number: I';.K. Subiect: PUBLIC HEARING: TO Consider the Conveyance of County Property to the Commonwealth of Virginia County Administrator's Comments= //~~ ,,~~ County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Approve the conveyance of county property to the Commonwealth of Virginia along Jefferson Davis Highway and Milhorn Street and authorize the Chairman of the Board and County Administrator to sign the deeds. Summary of Information: The Virginia Department of Transportation has requested the conveyance of county owned parcels for 1) the Jefferson Davis Highway, Woods Edge Road and Milhorn Street Project, and 2) the Old Stone Bridge over Falling Creek. Conveyance of county property requires a public hearing. Approval is recommended. District: Bermuda Preparer: John W. Harmon Title: Right of Way Manaqer Attachments: Ycs [No "Plot Of 7_0 FOOt. ,R. ig~Of Woy And Old Stone Bridge Located uver ~alllng c'reel~ In Chesterfield County, VlrglnlO Befween The Norfh And SoutA Bound I. ones Of US Route I" Beg. B-601 ~7'70.00 ~26'0 !i i Il " 22.8*0 2.29'0 ( Note ~ Coordinates In Thls Drowlng Are A~$umed SC~E 0 50' 100' Tt~T~$ A. Howfhorne, P. E. R.~lc~ Dote~ ~/S / ~oo ~ D/strict Adrfl, lnlstrotor I lJJilJii'*$ ll~lJ !j J{ h!lt 000~?0 ..... ~'¢' 'Tffft P ? Of P~blisher ~¢ THE R[CHCV'COND Tff~ES~D~SPAT'O~ U//ZU/ZUU5 THiS iS NOT A Bi[ I PLEASE PAY FROM INVOI(;E. THANK YOt~ CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page I of I Meetin~l Date: July27, 2005 Item Number: 19. Subiect: Adjournment and Notice of Next Scheduled Meeting of the Board of Supervisors County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Summary of Information: Motion of adjournment and notice of a regularly scheduled meeting to be held on August 24, 2005 at 3:00 p.m. Preparer: Lisa H. Elko Title: Clerk to the Board Attachments: --] Yes No