Loading...
05SN0272-July27.pdfJu!y ! 9, 2005 CPC July 27, 2005 BS STAFF'S REQUEST ANALYSIS AND RECOMMENDATION 05SN0272 Schoolhouse LLC Bermuda Magisterial District 3909 West Htmdred Road REQUEST: Rezoning from Residential (R-7) to Neighborhood Business (C-2). PROPOSED LAND USE: Commercial uses, as restricted by Proffered Condition 4, are planned. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION RECOMMEND APPROVAL AND ACCEPTANCE OF THE PROFFERED CONDITIONS ON PAGE 2. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Recommend approval for the following reason: While the proposed zoning and land uses do not conform to the adopted Chester Village Plan, the pending amendment to the Plan as recommended by the Planning Commission suggests that under certain circumstances some light commercial uses may be appropriate. (NOTE: THE ONLY CONDITION THAT MAY BE IMPOSED IS A BUFFER CONDITION. THE PROPERTY OWNER(S) MAY PROFFER OTHER CONDITIONS. THE CONDITIONS NOTED WITH "STAFF/CPC" WERE AGREED UPON BY BOTH STAFF AND THE COMMISSION. CONDITIONS WITH ONLY A "STAFF" ARE RECOMMENDED SOLELY BY STAFF. CONDITIONS WITH ONLY A "CPC" ARE ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS RECOMMENDED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION.) Providing a FIRST CHOICE community through excellence in public service PROFFERED CONDITIONS The Owner-Applicant in this zoning case, pursuant to Section 15.2-2298 of the Code of Virginia (1950 as amended) and the Zoning Ordinance of Chesterfield County, for itself and its successors or assigns, proffer that the development of the property known as Chesterfield County Tax ID 790-655-8954-00000 (the "Property") under consideration will be developed according to the following conditions if, and only if, the rezoning request for C-2 is granted. In the event the request is denied or approved with conditions not agreed to by the Owner- Applicant, these proffers and conditions shall be immediately null and void and of no further force or effect. (STAFF/CPC) Prior to site plan approval, a forty-five (45) foot right-of-way on the south side of Route 10, measured from the centerline of that part of Rome 10 immediately adjacent to the property, shall be dedicated free and unrestricted to and for the benefit of Chesterfield County. (T) (STAFF/CPC) (STAFF/CPC) No direct access shall be provided from the property to Route 10. Access shall be limited to one (1) access off of Petersburg Street at rear southem property line. (T) (STAFF/CPC) The property shall not be used for the following uses: (1) Appliance stores. (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) Department stores. Funeral homes or mortuaries. Motor vehicle accessory stores. Pet shops, including pet grooming. Rest, convalescent or nursing homes and other group care facilities. Sewing machine sales, instruction and services. (P) GENERAL INFORMATION Location: Southeast quadrant of the intersection of West Hundred Road and Petersburg Street, and known as 3909 West Hundred Road. Tax ID 790-655-8954 (Sheet 26). Existing Zoning: R-7 Size: 2 05SN0272-JULY27-BOS Existing Land Use: Single family residential Adjacent Zoning and Land Use: North, South and East - R-7; Public/semi-public (School) or vacant West - O-1; Office UTILITIES Public Water System: There is a sixteen (16) inch water line extending along a portion of Petersburg Street, adjacent to this site. In addition, a sixteen (16) inch water line extends along West Hundred Road, adjacent to this site. Use of public water is required by County Code. The existing structure is connected to the public water system. Public Wastewater System: An eight (8) inch wastewater collector line extends along West Hundred Road and continues along Petersburg Street, adjacent to this site. Use of the public wastewater system is required by County Code. The existing structure is connected to the public wastewater system. ENVIRONMENTAL Drainage and Erosion: The property drains toward the intersection of West Hundred Road and Petersburg Street and then leaves the area via Virginia Department Of Transportation storm-sewer systems. There are no existing or anticipated, on- or off-site, drainage or erosion problems. PUBLIC FACILITIES Fire Service: The Chester Fire Station, Company Number 1, and Bensley-Bermuda Volunteer Rescue Squad currently provide fire protection and emergency medical service (EMS) in this area. This request will have minimal impact on fire and EMS. Transportation: The property (0.3 acre) is located on the south side of West Hundred Road (Route 10), east of Petersburg Street. The property is currently zoned Residential (R-7) and a one (1) 05SN0272-JULY27-BOS story structure has been constructed. The applicant is requesting rezoning from R-7 to Neighborhood Business (C-2) to operate a business in the existing structure. This request will not limit development on the property to a specific land use; therefore, it is difficult to anticipate traffic generation. Based on high-turnover restaurant trip rates, development could generate approximately 160 average daily trips. These vehicles will be initially distributed, via Petersburg Street, to Route 10, which had a 2003 traffic count of 32,269 vehicles per day between Jefferson Davis Highway and Chester Road. The capacity of this section of Route 10 is acceptable (Level of Service D) for the volume of traffic it currently carries. The Thoroughfare Plan identifies Route 10 as a major arterial with a recommended right of way width of ninety (90) feet. The applicant has proffered to dedicate forty-five (45) feet of right of way measured from the centerline of Route 10 for the entire property frontage, in accordance with that Plan. (Proffered Condition 1) Development must adhere to the Development Standards Manual in the Zoning Ordinance relative to access and internal circulation (Division 5). Access to major arterials, such as Route 10, should be controlled. The applicant has proffered that no direct access will be provided from the property to Route 10 (Proffered Condition 2). The applicant has also proffered that direct access from the property to Petersburg Street will be limited to one (1) entrance/exit, located at the southern property line (Proffered Condition 3). This access will generally align Dodomeade Street. At time of site plan review, specific recommendations will be provided regarding access and internal site circulation. LAND USE Comprehensive Plan: Lies within the boundaries of the Chester Village Plan, which suggests the property is appropriate for mixed use: neighborhood office and single-family residential use. At their April meeting, the Planning Commission recommended an amendment to the Chester Village Plan. The Chester Plan, as it is known, is scheduled for public hearing before the Board of Supervisors on July 27, 2005. As recommended for approval by the Commission, The Chester Plan suggests office/residential mixed use is appropriate for this area. However, the Plan does allow for some light commercial uses if the property is designated as a Chesterfield County historic landmark and measures are taken to mitigate the impact of commercial development on surrounding properties. The property owner received a favorable recommendation from the Preservation Committee and Planning Commission for landmark designation of the site. The Board of Supervisors is expected to act on the landmark designation request at their July 27, 2005, public hearing. 4 05SN0272-JULY27-BOS Area Development Trends: Area properties are currently zoned for single family residential and office uses and have been developed for public/semi-public (school) and office uses or remains vacant. The Chester Village Plan suggests a continued mixture of office and residential uses along this portion of the Route 10 Corridor. The Chester Plan, if approved, could allow for some light commercial uses in the area. Development Standards: The request property lies within the Chester Village Corridor East area of the Chester Village District. The purpose of the Village District standards is to recognize unique villages within the county and to maintain and reinforce the character, identity and pedestrian scale by continuing and enhancing existing patterns of development. Redevelopment of the site or new construction must conform to the requirements of the Zoning Ordinance, which address street lights, street tree plantings, access, parking, landscaping, architectural treatment, setbacks, signs, buffers, utilities, and screening of dumpsters and loading areas. As previously noted, the Preservation Committee and Planning Commission have recommended approval of landmark designation for the property. The Board of Supervisors is scheduled to conduct a public hearing on the landmark designation on July 27, 2005. Should the landmark designation be approved a certificate of appropriateness must be issued for any construction, alteration or remodeling that would affect the exterior architectural appearance or property. Buffers and Screening: Adjacent property to the south and east is zoned Residential (R-7) and is vacant. The Zoning Ordinance requires a minimum fifty (50) foot buffer along the southern and eastern property boundaries of the request site. At the time of site plan review, the buffer requirements may be waived or modified. In addition, at such time that adjacent residential property is zoned or utilized for a non-residential use, the buffer can be further reduced or eliminated. CONCLUSIONS While the proposed zoning and land uses do not conform to the adopted Chester Village Plan which suggests the property is appropriate for mixed use: neighborhood office and single family residential use, The Chester Plan, a pending amendment to the Chester Village Plan, as recommended by the Planning Commission, suggests some light commercial uses in this area if the property is designated as a Chesterfield County historic landmark and measures mitigate the impact of commercial development on surrounding properties. The property owner applied for landmark designation of the site and received a favorable recommendation from the Preservation Committee and Planning Commission. The Board of Supervisors is scheduled to consider the landmark designation request at their July 27, 2005, public hearing. 05SN0272-JULY27-BOS Also, the proposed zoning and land uses are representative of, and compatible with, anticipated area development suggested by The Chester Plan. Given these considerations, approval of this request is recommended. CASE HISTORY Planning Commission Meeting (7/19/05): The applicant accepted the recommendation. There was no opposition present. On motion of Mr. Wilson, seconded by Mr. Gulley, the Commission recommended approval and acceptance of the proffered conditions on page 2. AYES: Unanimous The Board of Supervisors, on Wednesday, July 27, 2005, beginning at 7:00 p.m., will take under consideration this request. 05SN0272-JULY27-BOS