Loading...
05SR0171-July27.pdfJuly 27, 2005 BS STAFF'S REQUEST ANALYSIS AND RECOMMENDATION 05SR0171 Timothy J. Hauler Matoaea Magisterial District 6100 Woodpecker Road REQUEST: Renewal of Conditional Use (Case 03AN0226) to operate a bed and breakfast and special events business incidental to a dwelling unit. PROPOSED LAND USE: Continued operation ora bed and breakfast facility and a special events business, as well as residential use is planned. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION RECOMMEND APPROVAL SUBJECT TO THE CONDITIONS ON PAGE 2. (NOTE: THE APPLICANT HAS REQUESTED DEFERRAL TO THE BOARD'S JANUARY 25, 2006, PUBLIC HEARING.) STAFF RECOMMENDATION Recommend approval for the following reasons: The request allows for the adaptive reuse and preservation of an historic structure. The operation has existed for approximately three (3) years with no apparent adverse impact on area development. The recommended conditions further ensure compatibility with existing and anticipated area development. Providing a FIRST CHOICE community through excellence in public service (NOTE: CONDITIONS MAY BE IMPOSED OR THE PROPERTY OWNER MAY PROFFER CONDITIONS. THE CONDITIONS NOTED WITH "STAFF/CPC" WERE AGREED UPON BY BOTH STAFF AND THE COMMISSION. CONDITIONS WITH ONLY A "STAFF" ARE RECOMMENDED SOLELY BY STAFF. CONDITIONS WITH ONLY A "CPC" ARE ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS RECOMMENDED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION.) CONDITIONS (STAFF/CPC) 1. This Conditional Use shall be granted to and for Timothy J. and Patricia Hauler, exclusively, and shall not be transferable or run with the land. (P) (STAFF/CPC) 2. There shall be no additions or exterior alterations to the existing structures to accommodate this use. (P) (STAFF/CPC) 3. The special events business shall not be open to the public on Sunday thru Tuesday, except during nationally recognized holidays, during which time the use may be open to the public as early as two (2) days before and as late as two (2) days after such holiday. On days the special events business is open to the public, the hours open to the public shall be restricted to between 9:00 a. m. and 11:00 p. m. (P) (CPC) 4. Special events shall be limited to the following: ao Corporate retreats Church retreats Weddings (including rehearsal dinners and bridal luncheons) Receptions (P) (CPC) Attendance at special events shall be restricted to a maximum of 250 individuals at any one (1) function. (P) (CPC) A minimum of one (1) security officer for each one hundred (100) persons shall be provided at all special events to direct traffic in and out of the property and to monitor the lawful conduct of guests attending the event. (P) GENERAL INFORMATION Location: Northwest quadrant of the intersection of Woodpecker Road and John Winston Jones Parkway, and known as 6100 Woodpecker Road. Tax ID 781-626-8240 (Sheet 41). 2 05SR0171-JULY27-BOS Existing Zoning: A with Special Exception Size: 14.5 acres Existing Land Use: Single-family residential and commercial Adjacent Zoning and Land Use: North - A; Vacant South - A; Single-family residential or vacant East - A; Vacant West - A; Vacant UTILITIES Public Water System: The public water system is available to serve this site. A sixteen (16) inch water line extends along the north side of Woodpecker Road adjacent to the request site. The existing structure is served by a private well, and it is the intent to continue to utilize the well. While the County Code requires the use of the public water system for most uses, those uses allowed by Conditional Use which are incidental to a principal use that was previously allowed with a private well are exempt from the mandatory connection. Public Wastewater System: The public wastewater system is not available to serve the request site. County Code allows the use of private septic systems with approval of the Health Department. Private Septic System: Continued and expanded use of the private septic system must be approved by the Health Department. ENVIRONMENTAL Drainage and Erosion: The requested amendment will have no impact on these facilities. 3 05SR0171-JULY27-BOS Fire Service: PUBLIC FACILITIES The Ettrick Fire Station, Company Number 12, and Ettrick Matoaca Volunteer Rescue Squad currently provide fire protection and emergency medical service. This request will not impact fire and EMS. Transportation: The property (14.5 acres) is located in the northwest comer of the Woodpecker Road/John Winston Jones Parkway intersection. The applicant is requesting renewal of a conditional use to permit a bed and breakfast and special events business. Condition 4 will limit the days these uses are open to the public to Fridays, Saturdays and two (2) days before and after national holidays. Due to this limitation, this request will have a minimal impact on the transportation network. LAND USE Comprehensive Plan: Lies within the boundaries of the Southern and Western Area Plan, which suggests the property is appropriate for residential use on 1-5 acre lots, suited to R-88 zoning. Area Development Trends: The area is characterized by single-family residential uses on large lots or is vacant. In addition, a public/semi-public use (Matoaca High School) is located in close proximity to the subject property. Single-family residential development is expected to continue in the area for the foreseeable future. Zoning History: On April 3, 2002, the Board of Zoning Appeals approved a Special Exception to operate a bed and breakfast and special events business from the home on the request site (Case 02AN0207). The uses were permitted to operate for a period not to exceed three (3) years. On December 18, 2002, the Board of Supervisors, upon a favorable recommendation from the Planning Commission and the Preservation Committee, approved landmark designation for the Dellwood structure and foundation located on the request site. (Case 03HP0150) On April 2, 2003, the Board of Zoning Appeals approved an amendment to Special Exception (Case 02AN0207) to permit an increase in the number of individuals allowed to attend any one (1) function at the special events facility (Case 03AN0226). The uses were 4 05SR0171-JULY27-BOS permitted to operate for a period not to exceed two (2) years. Since approval of Case 03AN0226, the Zoning Ordinance has been amended to require that the requested uses may be allowed through the Conditional Use process. Development Standards: The site is currently occupied by the Dellwood plantation home, which has also been used as a bed and breakfast and special events business for the last three (3) years. Conditions should be required which would minimize the impact these uses might have on area development. Condition 1 limits the Conditional Use to the applicant only. Additions or alterations to the existing structure to accommodate the uses should not be permitted (Condition 2). Condition 3 places limitations on the days and hours the special events business may be open to the public. The Commission recommended imposition of Conditions 4 through 6 to address concerns of area residents. Enforcement of these conditions will be difficult. CONCLUSION The request allows for the adaptive reuse and preservation of an historic structure. In addition, through Special Exception, the bed and breakfast and special events business have existed for approximately three (3) years with no apparent adverse impact on area development. The recommended conditions further ensure compatibility with existing and anticipated area development. Given these considerations, approval of this request is recommended. CASE HISTORY Applicant (3/15/05): The applicant requested that Condition 3 be modified. Planning Commission Meeting (3/15/05): The applicant accepted the recommendation. There was opposition present. A request was made for the Commission to defer the request to allow time for the applicant and area residents to develop a list of standards to restrict the intensity of the uses and to limit the Conditional Use for a time period to allow reevaluation of the appropriateness of the use in the future. Mr. Bass suggested imposition of additional conditions. 5 05SR0171-JULY27-BOS On motion of Mr. Bass, seconded by Mr. Gulley, the Commission recommended approval subject to the conditions on pages 2 and 3. AYES: Unanimous. Board of Supervisors' Meeting (4/27/05): On their motion, the Board deferred this case to July 27, 2005. Staff (4/28/05): The applicant was advised in writing that any significant, new or revised information should be submitted no later than May 16, 2005, for consideration at the Board's July 27, 2005, public hearing. Applicant and Staff (6/1/05): A meeting was held to discuss the operation. Applicant and Staff (7/7/05): A meeting was held to discuss the operation and possible amendment of the application. The applicant submitted a request for the Board to defer this case to January 25, 2006. The Board of Supervisors, on Wednesday, July 27, 2005, beginning at 7:00 p.m., will take under consideration this request. 05SR0171-JULY27-BOS ( \ NEIGHBORS OF 6100 WOODPECKER ROAD AND MEMBERS/ ATTENDEES AT NEW HOPE BAPTIST CHURCH CIO BRENDA L. STEWART 591 ! Woodpecker Road, Chesterfield, VA 23838 Phone/Fax: (804) 590-2309 E-ma#: bl-stewart~comcast, net July 27, 2005 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHESTERFIELD BOARD OF SUPERVISORS SUBJECT: Case 05SR0171, Timothy J. Hauler (Dellwood Plantation) You are scheduled to hear subject case this evening. ! did not present this document earlier because I have been attempting to contact the Matoaca Supervisor regarding this case. At this time, I have been unsuccessful in reaching her. As spokesperson for my neighborhood and members/attendees at New Hope Baptist Church (located close to Dellwood), I have built an extensive history on this case through documenting several issues that have arisen regarding compliance with the requirements of the Building Code, Health Department regulations, and zoning ordinances. Please refer to our letter of April 25, 2005, that informed the Board of our request to impose conditions and limitations on the renewal of the conditional use to operate a bed and breakfast and special events business incidental to a dwelling unit. I provided that same letter to the Planning Department. That letter reiterated a deficiency that has existed from the beginning of operation of this businessmthe lack of a commercial occupancy permit. It is noted that a Certificate of Occupancy was issued on June 3, 2005, for 6100 Woodpecker Road establishing a total occupancy load of 49. That number is fewer than the applicants' stated use of 100. It is also noted that the current Staff's Request Analysis and Recommendation dated April 27, 2005 BS, includes under "Private Septic System," the statement: "Continued and expanded use of t,~e private septic system must be approved by the Health Department." We question why that statement did not result in the requirement to have the system approved as a condition precedent to the renewal. If the approval has been granted, then the Staff's document should be corrected. The referenced Staff's document also states under Area Development Trends: "The area is characterized by single-family residential uses on large lots or is vacant." We believe that it would be more descriptive of the transition occurring in this area and more helpful to those considering the impact of approving a special events business with unlimited guests to include the information about the two subdivisions that have been approved to build an additional 120 or more homes in the immediate vicinity of 6100 Woodpecker Road (Dellwood), Another issue that we wish to present is that of enforcement of permit conditions. When people almost half a mile away can stand on the steps of their dwelling and hear the music from the special events loud enough to identify the songs being played, it would seem the noise ordinance is being violated. At 10:10 pm on July 9, 2004, "Truly Madly Deeply" was playing ("1 want to lay like this forever until the sky falls down on me"). At 10:20 pm on that same date, it was Na Na Hey Hey Hey (Kiss Him Goodbye) ("Hey hey, hey, goodbye"). On July 23, 2004, at 10:10 pm the song was "Sweet Home Alabama." The music was still playing at 10:30 pm. The same decibel level has been heard at other times, including last fall and this spring. On July 16, the music was not quite loud enough to identify the title, but it was audible at 10:55 pm. The business is operating without a permit at this time, because the permit expired May 1, 2005. Deferrals result in allowing the applicant to continue to operate in violation of the ordinances without concern for citations because of the forbearance policy that applies while a zoning case is active. However, we would expect that the conditions of the previous permit should be applicable until the renewal is granted. Conditions imposed on the previous permit include one requiring events to end at 10 pm. Given the recent failure to abide by that condition, we would not agree that the closing time should be extended to 11 pm under any renewal. The other concern is that we have been advised by the Planning Department that its enforcement personnel are not permitted on the "Posted" property at 6100 Woodpecker Road. It appears that there will be no effective way to enforce most of the conditions being imposed. In fact, the Staff's document dated April 27, 2005, states: "The Commission recommended imposition of Conditions 4 through 6 to address concerns of area residents. Enforcement of these conditions will be difficult.' Given (1) the failure to obtain the required occupancy permit until after the application for renewal had been forwarded to the Board of Supervisors, (2) the repeated and knowing use of land not zoned for the business, (3) the failure to comply with conditions imposed regarding days of operation (See applicant's statement in Case 03AN0226-APR2-BZA that business use is conducted evenings during the week.), (4) failure to comply with restrictions on the hours of operation (complaints filed with Planning Department), (5) failure to comply with the decibel level allowed for music (complaints filed with Planning Department) and (6) the initial failure to comply with the site plan requirement, we seriously question the basis on which the Board would vote to renew this permit. The County advised this applicant in a letter dated October 3, 2002, that "a conditional use permit from the Board of Supervisors would be necessary for the sale and consumption of alcohol at 6200 Woodpecker Road." If the applicant had an issue with that advice from the Director of Planning, then why did the applicant not challenge it at that time? Instead, the applicant has continued to use the property at 6200 Woodpecker Road and perhaps even 6044 Woodpecker Road in the operation of the special events business even though it was not zoned for the business. That much is clear from the photographs provided with the April 25, 2005, letter to you and from reference to the Dellwood website. The applicant did not even include all property being used in the busines.s in. the zonin,q application submitted for the permit renewal. The applicant signed a zoning application showing that the acreage used in the business was the 14.5 acres comprising 6100 Woodpecker Road, when clearly the applicant has been using 6200 Woodpecker Road in the special events business and perhaps even 6044 Woodpecker Road. The planner on this case has advised that the applicant's intention is to amend the application to include the property at 6200 Woodpecker at some point in the future following appeal of a July 6, 2005, Zoning Certificate issued by the Planning Department advising the applicant that use of the 6200 Woodpecker Road property would require a conditional use permit from the Board of Supervisors. This same issue has been raised repeatedly since the initial application was filed in 2002. The applicant even moved the property line at 6100 Woodpecker Road so that it would be more than 500 feet from the new Matoaca High School property, but continued to use the property at 6200 Woodpecker Road in the business. The tent used for receptions and other structures used in the business are located on property outside the boundaries of 6100 Woodpecker Road, the zoned properly. After continuously violating zoning ordinances and permit conditions, the applicant now requests a deferral of this case until January 2006 to deal with issues that have been outstanding since the business began three years ago. We believe that the open, continuing and multiple violations of various ordinances and conditions make it clear that this applicant does not intend to operate the business in accordance with the County's ordinances and the permit conditions imposed. Unfortunately, our experience shows that enforcement will be negligible to nonexistent. If neighbors call the police regarding the noise level, it will not be a pdority call, especially on the weekend nights when events are most likely and the police are busiest. By the time they arrive, the problem may no longer be evident. In addition, we believe sending a police officer to a judge's residence when that police officer will be continuously appearing before that same judge on police business sets up an uncomfortable situation for the police officer. Most neighbors do not want to place police officers in that position, so they do not call them. Certainly this applicant cannot claim ignorance of the law. We believe that the applicant is using the system to obtain a lengthy deferral to avoid being cited for longstanding violations of ordinances. We ask that you recognize the .documented, repeated failures of this applicant to comply with ordinances and imposed conditions as a lack of good faith on the part of the applicant and refuse to renew the permit because this business constitutes a nuisance to the neighborhood. Because we understand that refusal to renew the permit would have a serious, adverse effect on innocents who have planned special events such as weddings there this summer and fall, we would agree that the business could be permitted to operate under an extension of the previous permit with the previous conditions imposed for the remainder of this year. No new contracts should be allowed. We do not believe you should impose on this neighborhood a business that clearly does not follow the rules and the law until repeatedly pressured to do so. Again, we ask that you deny the renewal while allowing the business to honor its contracts for the remainder of this year only. Should you choose to renew the permit contrary to our requests, we ask that you carefully consider imposing the conditions we requested and require the applicant to reapply within one or two years. NEIGHBORS OF 6100 WOODPECKER ROAD AND MEMBERS/ATTENDEES AT NEW HOPE BAPTIST CHURCH April 25, 2005 Board of Supervisors, Chesterfield County P.O. Box 40 Chesterfield, VA 23832-0040 RE: Request 05SR0171, Timothy J. Hauler Dear Board Member: The Board will hear the referenced case, a renewal of conditional use (Case 03AN0226) to operate a bed and breakfast and special events business incidental to a dwelling unit, on Wednesday, April 27, 2005. Citizens in the area and those attending the New Hope Baptist Church do not support the renewal as proposed. We object to the elimination of almost all conditions previously imposed and the failure to require a renewal. Additional concerns about failure to follow previous restrictions and about enforcement of Chesterfield Code and State Building Code provisions are also documented in the enclosure. Enclosed are petitions and a document that specifies the limitations we are asking you to retain upon renewal. Rationale for the limitations is provided. Only the owners of the five parcels of land directly across the road from 6100 Woodpecker Road were notified of the renewal and the community meeting held by the Planning Department. Because of illness and other factors, none of those residents was at that meeting. Because of other commitments, we are unsure what neighbors will be available to attend Wednesday's meeting to speak at the public hearing. However, we shall be following your action on this case. Please be sure to give full consideration to the requests filed with this letter. Photographs and a copy of an aerial map are enclosed to help in your review. A drive along John Winston Jones Parkway past the Dellwood Plantation would also assist you in confirming the information presented in our request. Sincerely, 4 Enclosures (11 pages) NEIGHBORS OF 6100 WOODPECKER ROAD AND MEMBERS/ATTENDEES AT NEW HOPE BAPTIST CHURCH PETITION TO (1) IMPOSE LIMITATIONS ON TIMOTHY J. HAULER'S RENEWAL OF CONDITIONAL USE TO OPERATE SPECIAL EVENTS BUSINESS AT 6100 WOODPECKER ROAD (CASE 05SR0171); (2) ENFORCE OR REVISE SECTION 19-227 OF THE CHESTERFIELD CODE & (3) ENFORCE BUILDING CODE REQUIREMENT FOR COMMERCIAL OCCUPANCY PERMIT (See attached.) PLEASE SIGN INDIVIDUALLY-- Neighbors NAME ADDRESS PHONE 1 PETITION TO (1) IMPOSE LIMITATIONS ON TIMOTHY J. HAULER'S RENEWAL OF CONDITIONAL USE TO OPERATE SPECIAL EVENTS BUSINESS AT 6100 WOODPECKER ROAD(CASE 05SR0171); (2) ENFORCE OR REVISE SECTION 19-227 OF THE CHESTERFIELD CODE & (3) ENFORCE BUILDING CODE REQUIREMENT FOR COMMERCIAL OCCUPANCY PERMIT (See attached.) PLEASE SIGN INDII'~D UALL Y (Members/Attendees--New Hope Baptist Church) NAME~ ADDRESS PHONE PETITION TO (1) IMPOSE LIMITATIONS ON TIMOTHY J. HAULER'S RENEWAL OF CONDITIONAL USE TO OPERATE SPECIAL EVENTS BUSINESS AT 6100 WOODPECKER ROAD (CASE 05SR0171); (2) ENFORCE OR REVISE SECTION 19-227 OF THE CHESTERFIELD CODE & (3) ENFORCE BUILDING CODE REQUIREMENT FOR COMMERCIAL OCCUPANCY PERMIT (See attached.) PLEASE SIGN INDIVIDUALLY (Members/Attendees--New Hope Baptist Church) NAME OOR SS PHONE CASE 05SR0171 TIMOTHY J. HAULER, 6100 WOODPECKER ROAD REQUEST FOR (1) IMPOSITION OF LIMITATIONS (CONDITIONS), (2) ENFORCEMENT OR REVISION OF SECTION ! 9-227 OF THE CHESTERFIELD CODE AND (3) ENFORCEMENT OF THE BUILDING CODE REQUIREMENT FOR COMMERCIAL OCCUPANCY PERMIT The original request (02AN0207) and the amendment requesting an increase in the number of individuals permitted to attend events (03AN0226) had five conditions imposed on the bed and breakfast business and 14 conditions imposed on the special events business. The renewal request provides for only two conditions that apply to both businesses and one that applies to the special events business while expanding the number of operating days and removing the limitation on total events permitted annually. The Planning Commission recommended extending the hours of operation until 11 p.m., retaining the limitation on individuals to 250 per event and recommended a requirement for a security officer for each 100 guests. In addition to retaining Conditions 1 and 2 as proffered by the applicant, we ask that Condition 3 be modified to specify that the live and DJ music not be allowed at Sunday events out of consideration for the neighborhood and the New Hope Baptist Church. According to Mir. Bass' remarks at the Planning Commission public hearing on this case, the applicant does not plan Sunday events. In that case, this request should not be an issue. The previous requests prohibited special events on Sunday. With the condition prohibiting live and DJ music on Sunday, we will not interpose an objection to expanding the business to those Sundays associated with nationally recognized holidays. Without this condition, we object to expanding the special events business to include Sunday operation. We ask that the approval for this conditional use be limited to three years. At that time the applicant can reapply. The change from permitting a business with more than a dozen conditions that is required to reapply in three years to approving a business with three minimal conditions with no requirement to reapply is too great a leap and is unjustified based on the circumstances. Five houses have been built directly across the road from this business since the initial application. Rezoning provides for building an additional 120 or more houses on property directly to the north and east of the property owned by this applicant. We do not agree that removing almost all the conditions to permit unlimited expansion of the business and permitting the special events business in perpetuity provides adequate protection to the neighborhood. The neighborhood is just developing around this property and the requirement to come back in three years will provide the future neighbors an opportunity to assess the effect of this expanded business on enjoyment of their property. (The business is no longer limited to Fridays and Saturdays or limited as to individuals attending or limited as to total number of events per year.) Another reason to require reapplication is that the business has not complied with the conditions imposed in previous approvals. Condition 3 of both earlier requests limited the special event use to the house and yard. Given the address listed in the case as 6100 Woodpecker Road, one would expect that meant the yard at 6100 Woodpecker. However, it is clear to neighbors, to church members and to anyone else who drives on John Winston Jones Parkway and looks over at the property that the events have not been limited to the house and yard. The structures used for the events are clearly not even on the property at 6100 Woodpecker Road. They are not even on the original "zoning lot" as classified by 2 the Planning Department. This has been brought to the attention of the Planning Department. A review of the aerial Parcel Map of Chesterfield County for this property in conj unction with a drive-by viewing would make this fact obvious. Also see pictures of the structures used in the business at www.dellwoodplantation.com to compare with the photos taken from John Winston Jones Parkway provided with this document. Even though the additional property is owned by the applicant, the use of property other than that zoned for use in the special events business, also raises another question--that of enforcement of Section 19-227 of the Code of Chesterfield. That code section prohibits the sale of alcohol within 500 feet of school property. The tent used for outdoor special events is obviously the site of alcohol service. The applicant's property line tbr 6100 Woodpecker Road was originally within 500 feet of the new Matoaca High School. Subsequently, the property line was moved away from the school. However, moving the property line for 6100 Woodpecker Road and then using other property in the special events business that is even closer to the school than the originally zoned property seems inappropriate. If the county government does not plan to enforce the provisions of Code Section 19-227 against certain types of businesses, then as we have previously indicated, that Code Section should be revised. Until it is, it should be enforced. This use of property not zoned tbr use in the business raises additional questions. Why is this being permitted without requiring the applicant's request to cover all the property, being used in the business? It would seem that if the applicant wishes to use additional property other than that approved by the county for business use, then the application should be modified. Is that not the usual procedure? Why is it not being enforced in this case? Condition 9 of previous approval limited use to a maximum of 250 individuals at any one function. This request removes all such limitations. That is totally unacceptable to the neighborhood. We ask that you retain the limitation of 250 individuals. Condition 10 of previous approvals prohibited parking within the public road rights of way adjacent to this property. We ask that you retain that prohibition. Considering the location of the high school and the approval of a subdivision with approximately 60 homes behind the high school, many future residents and patrons of Matoaca High School will be using John Winston Jones Parkway. We believe retention of this condition is essential. Condition 11 of previous approvals required a security officer at all events with 75 guests or more. That condition has been eliminated. We believe this is entirely inappropriate given the serving of alcohol at events and the number of guests. Other, similar businesses have requirements for a security officer when fewer than 75 guests are present. We believe that this condition must be retained. Condition 12 of previous approvals required serving of alcohol to be discontinued one hour prior to the end of the function. This condition should be retained because of public safety issues. The Planning Commission has recommended extension of operating hours until 11 p.m. This condition will become even more important if the Board accepts that recommendation. As of the date of the Planning Commission public hearing on this request, the business had no commercial occupancy permit. It is obvious from the description of the facilities on the applicant's website and from guests that have attended functions there that more than five people are using the "Manor House" when the function is a paid function hosted by someone other than the applicant. The applicant's spouse also stated in an ABC Department hearing that they would be serving as many as 100 guests in the house fbr rehearsal dinners and other parties as advertised. The business is open all year and is not restricted to holding events outside. Thus, it seems necessary fbr the business to obtain a commercial occupancy permit to comply with the State Building Code. Parcel Map of Chesterfield County Chester6e~d CounW assumes no legal responsibihty for the ini~ation contai~qed on this map~ This map is not to be used fbr land conveyance. The horizontal data is based on the \qa~ State Plane Coordinate system, NZ~ 1983~ The t~pogra:plhic inib~rmation is based on 1989 photog~'~met~~ and NAVD29~ Aerial imagery was taken in February,: ~ Feet 0 45 90 180 by: GIS