01-23-2002 PacketCHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Page 1 of 1
Meeting Date: January 23, 2002
Item Number: 5.
Subject:
Recognition of Dr. Robert E. Wagenknecht for ~is Service to Chesterfield
County Public Library
County Administrator's Comments:
County Administrator: ~/~
Board Action Requested:
Adoption of attached resolution.
Summary of Information:
Dr. Wagenknecht will retire February 1, 2002 after serving as Director of the
Chesterfield County Public Library for nearly 20 years.
Title:Deputy County Administrator
for Human Services
Attachments:
3001
RECOGNIZING DR. ROBERT E. WAGENKNECHT FOR HIS SERVICE
TO THE CHESTERFIELD COUNTY PUBLIC LIBRARY
WHEREAS, Dr. Robert E. Wagenknecht became director of the Chesterfield County Public Library
in May 1982, and established a mission statement which furthered bringing people and information
together, and created library goals that would enable the Library to help people know more about
themselves and their world, supplement formal study and encourage self-education, stimulate
thoughtful participation in the affairs of the community, country and world, and support
educational, civic and cultural activities within the community; and
WHEREAS, Dr. Waqenknecht provided strong leadership throughout his tenure and acted as a
champion of diversity; and
WHEREAS, in 1985 Dr. Wagenknecht worked with Virginia Commonwealth University's Survey
Research Laboratory to conduct a citizen survey to determine county citizens' perceptions of the
library, identify user patterns and assess adequacy of materials and services; and
WHEREAS, in 1986 as a result of the citizen survey, Dr. Wagenknecht oversaw the development
of A Library Service Plan for Chesterfield County which outlined improvements to collections,
library facilities and programs; and
WHEREAS, during his nearly twenty years with Chesterfield County Public Library the
Library's collection doubled in size and total items checked out more than tripled from just under
1 million items in 1982 to over 3.3 million in 2001; and
WHEREAS, Dr. Wagenknecht more than doubled the library square footage from a central library
and five branches with 59,800 square feet, to a central library, eight branches and a public law
library with 153,600 square feet; and
WHEREAS, Dr. Wagenknecht involved citizens in planning new facilities including developing
a program in 1996 for a future community arts center in Chester; and
WHEREAS, in 1996 in response to changing technology, Dr. Wagenknecht oversaw the development
of An Information System Plan for the Chesterfield County Public Library and implemented the new
information system, LINC, in October 1999; and
WHEREAS, Dr. Wagenknecht accomplished these improvements in collections, facilities and
technology while also bringing people and information together through library programs which
fostered the love of reading, promoted life-long learning and provided opportunities for growth
for all our citizens; and
WHEREAS, these Library programs have been recognized both nationally and statewide and have
won 12 NACo awards and six awards from the Virginia Public Library Directors Association; and
W~REA$, Dr. Wagenknecht demonstrated outstanding professional leadership in public
librarianship serving as President or Chairman of the Virginia Public Library Directors
Association, the Capital Area Library Directors, Chesterfield Historical Society of Virginia,
Richmond Philharmonic, WCVE-FM Community Advisory Board, and the Public Library Directors Section
of the Virginia Library Association, along with numerous other organizations; and
WHEREAS, Dr. Wagenknecht exemplifies Thomas Jefferson's thoughts and feelings when he said,
"No one more sincerely wishes the spread of information among mankind than I do, and none has
greater confidence in its effect towards supporting free and good government"; and
WHEREAS, as a result of Dr. Wagenknecht's leadership the Chesterfield County Public Library
will continue to enrich and enhance the quality of life for the citizens of the Chesterfield
County Community in years to come.
0 '30O2
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors publicly
recognizes Dr. Robert E. Wagenknecht for nearly 20 years of service to the county and offers
congratulations upon his retirement and best wishes for the future.
AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that a copy of this resolution be presented to Dr. Wagenknecht
and that this resolution be permanently recorded among the papers of this Board of Supervisors
of Chesterfield County, Virginia.
0 3003
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Page I of 2
Meetin~l Date: Januar~ 23, 2002
Item Number: 6.n.
Subiect: Work Session - Rayon Park Failing Septic Systems
County Administrator's Comments:
County Administrator:
Board Action Requested:
Summary of Information:
Three options have been presented to the Board of Supervisors to address
failing septic systems in Rayon Park. The first option is for property
owners to repair their septic systems with assistance from the Community
Development Block Grant Office for those who qualify. The other two options
would provide sewer service to portions of the Rayon Park subdivision by
establishing sewer assessment districts. The assessment for each buildable
parcel would be limited to $3,000 with Community Development Block Grant
funds covering the remainder of the project cost.
The second option would involve installing sewer lines to provide sewer
service to seven of the eight properties that have been identified as having
failing septic systems. The third option would provide sewer service to all
existing structures in the subdivision.
Preparer:
G~ai~ S. ~ryant
AttaChments:
Ycs
'~No
Title: Director of Utilities
0 ~04
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Page 2 of 2
Summary of Information: (Continued)
Information regarding the proposed assessment districts was sent to each
property owner which included a form to be returned to the Utilities
Department expressing opposition or support. A co~c~unity meeting was held on
November 8, 2001 to explain the process for establishing assessment districts
and to answer questions. The response information for both options is shown
in the attached table. A second community meeting was held on January 10,
2002 to present the results of the survey.
The support for creating an assessment district in Rayon Park is very low
when compared with assessment districts that have been established by The
Board of Supervisors. Staff does not support creating either of the proposed
assessment districts based on the low level of support.
Rayon Park- Survey Results
OPTION "2"
Property Owners Buildable Parcels Existinq Structures
TOTALS 39 52 17
Support 16 19 7
Opposition 15 22 7
No Response 8 11 3
% Support 41% 37% 41%
% Opposition 38% 42% 41%
% No Response 21% 21% 18%
OPTION "3"
Property Owners Buildable Parcels Existinq Structures
TOTALS 96 202 73
Support 38.5 * 72 31
Opposition 41.5 * 101 33
No Response 16 29 9
% Support 40% 36% 43%
% Opposition 43% 50% 45%
% No Response 17% 14% 12%
Note: * indicates that an owner of multiple parcels supported the assessment district for the parcel
on which their residence is located, but were in opposition for the undeveloped property.
Revised: January 17, 2002
0
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Page 1 of 2
Meetin~l Date:
Subject:
Januar~ 23, 2002
Item Number: 6.B.
Work Session on the Proposed FY2003 - 2008 Capital Improvement Program
County Administrator's Comments:
County Administrator: /x~
Board Action Requested.'~/
Hold a work session on the Proposed FY2003 - 2008 Capital Improvement
Program.
Summary of Information:
A work session on the proposed Capital Improvement Program (CIP) has been
scheduled for this date. The proposed CIP encompasses a six year period,
FY2003-2008. The Program advances priorities established in recent years,
and begins to establish projects and priorities for the next referendum.
The six year plan proposes expenditures of over $572 million.
the CIP is as follows:
A breakdown of
General County Projects
School Projects
Utility Projects
$190,091,300
271,772,700
110,888,000
Total
$572,752,000
Preparer:
Rebecca T. Dickson
Title: Director, Budget & Management
Attachments:
Ycs
~]No
I
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Page 2 of 2
Meetin~l Date: Janua~ 23, 2002
The Proposed CIP, including revenues and specific expenditures will be
reviewed at the work session. Highlights of the Schools CIP will also be
presented at this time. Details of the Utilities Department CIP will be
summarized during the review of the Utilities Department operating budget
at a future Board meeting.
In accordance with the County Charter, the CIP must be adopted by May 1st.
The Proposed CIP is attached for your review.
0 ~0~4
0 9027
0 9~
?
~'~
0 0031
0 O08Z
0 0084
0 0035
0 0086
DEPARTMENT OF
BUDGET AND MANAGEMENT
Rebecca T. Dickson
Director
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
The Honorable Members of the Board of Supervisors
Rebecca T. Dicks on, Director, Budget and Manageme/n~/~
January 11, 2002
1996 Referendum Status Report
Attached please find a 1996 Referendum Status Report for Public Safety, Schools, Library and Parks &
Recreation projects.
This information will not be formally presented during the work session on the Proposed FY2003-2008 CIP;
however, staffwill be prepared to address any questions you may have at that time.
Cc: Lane B. Ramsey
0 0087
X
X
X
0 0040
0
0
0
X X X
0 O04Lt
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Page 1 of 2
Meeting Date: January 23, 2002
Item Number: 8.A.
Su~ect:
Nomination/Appointment/Reappointment
Advisory Board
Coun~ Administrators Comments:
to the Keep
Chesterfield Clean
Nominate/Appoint/Reappoint members to serve on the Keep Chesterfield Clean
Advisory Board
Summary of Information:
The Keep Chesterfield Clean Advisory Board is made of citizen
representatives of the five magisterial districts and a representative of
local government. This Board oversees the Litter and Recycling Grant
received by the County from the Department of Environmental Quality. Its
purpose is to ensure that educational pro~rams and activities are conducted
to inform Chesterfield residents of the problems with littering and the
benefits of recycling.
Persons being submitted for Nomination/Appointment/Reappointment:
Joan Cole has served as a Bermuda District Representative on the Keep
Chesterfield Clean Advisory Board and is eligible for reappointment to a
term from February 1, 2002 - January 31, 2003. Mr. McHale concurs with
this
reappointment~~ ~ l
Preparer: ~ ~ Title: Extension Aqent
Suzan Craik
Attachments:
[--~ Yes
No
0 c0044
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Page 2 of 2
Louise Summey has served as a Midlothian Representative on the Keep
Chesterfield Clean Advisory Board and is eligible for reappointment to a
term from February 1, 2002 - January 31, 2003. Mr. Barber concurs with
this reappointment.
Charles Lewis has served as a Dale District Representative on the Keep
Chesterfield Clean Advisory Board and his term expires on January 31, 2002.
Henrietta Yaworsky has expressed interest to serve as the new Dale District
representative for a term from February 1, 2002 - January 31, 2003. Mr.
Miller concurs with this appointment.
Pat Roble has served as a Clover Hill District representative on the Keep
Chesterfield Clean Advisory Board and is eligible for reappointment to a
term from February 1, 2002 - January 31, 2003. Mr. Warren concurs with
this reappointment.
Henrietta Yaworsky has served as the Matoaca District representative and
her term expires on January 31, 2002. As a result of redistricting, Ms.
Yaworsky now resides in the Dale District. She has expressed interest to
serve as the new Dale representative. Mary Clair Thomas has expressed
interest to serve as the new Matoaca District representative for a term
from February 1, 2002 - January 31, 2003. Staff recommends this
appointment. Mrs. Humphrey concurs with this appointment.
Under the existing Rules of Procedure, appointments to boards and
committees are nominated at one meeting and appointed at the subsequent
meeting unless the Rules of Procedure are suspended by a unanimous vote of
the Board members present. Nominees are voted on into the order in which
they are nominated.
0 0045
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Page 1 of 2
Meetin~l Date: January 23, 2002
Item Number: S.B.
Subject:
Acceptance of a Bid to Purchase Chesterfield County General Obligation Public
Improvement Bonds, Series 2002
County Administrator's Comments:
County Administrator: (~
Board Action Requested?
Approval and acceptance of a bid to purchase $23,280,000 principal amount of
Chesterfield County General Obligation Public Improvement Bonds.
Summary of Information:
On December 15, 1997 the Board of Supervisors adopted a resolution approving
the issuance of $215,574,000 principal amount in general obligation public
improvement bonds (the balance between the amount approved in the 1996
referendum and the amount sold in FY1997). Today's sale represents
$23,280,000 principal amount of General Obligation Public Improvement Bonds,
Series of 2002 and represents the final sale from the amount authorized with
the 1996 referendum. In 1996, the county set out to sell bonds over a six-
year period, beginning in 1997; with this sale, the county has met that
timetable.
Preparer:
Rebecca T. Dickson
Title: Director, Budget & Management
Attachments'
Yes
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Meetin~l Date: January 23, 2002
Page 2 of 2
The responsible bidder, whose proposal must represent the lowest true
interest cost to the County, and whose proposal must be in accordance with
the Detailed Notice of Sale, will be identified on January 23 after the
bids are opened. The bond proceeds will be used to fund school and public
safety capital improvement projects.
Summary of 1996 Referendum
Prior Sales
1/23 Sale Total
Schools $158,964,000 $15,835,000
Public Safety 26,571,000 7,445,000
Libraries 10,300,000 0
Parks 9,255,000 0
TOTAL $205,090,000 $23,280,000
$174,799,000
34,016,000
10,300,000
9,255,000
$228,370,000
Bonds are typically sized in $5,000 increments. Of the $228.4 million
authorized, $4,000 will remain authorized but unissued for public safety
improvements due to the inability to meet the sizing increment. An
alternate funding source will be used to keep public safety capital
improvement projects funded at the approved amounts.
0 9047'
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Page 1 of 2
Meetin~l Date: January 23, 2002
Item Number: s.c.
Subject:
Consideration on an Emergency Basis of an Amendment to the County's Land
Use Taxation Ordinance to Extend the Application Deadline
County Administrator's Comments:
County Administrator:
Board Action Requeste .'~
The Board of Supervisors is requested to adopt the attached ordinance on
an emergency basis and to schedule a public hearing for February 13, 2002 to
readopt the emergency ordinance.
Summary of Information:
Pursuant to state law, the County's Land Use Taxation Program
("Program") provides reduced real estate taxes for qualified property owners.
November 1st of each year is the initial deadline for a property owner to
file an application to participate in the Program for the following tax year.
On October 24, 2001, the Board of Supervisors extended that deadline an
additional sixty days to year's end upon the property owner's payment of a
$25 late fee. However, sometimes a Program participant makes changes to his
real property between November 1st and December 31st, such as changing the
acreage, that requires a new application to be filed. It had been the policy
of the Assessor's Office to send a letter to such Program participants that
allowed them 10 days to file a new application to remain in the Program. The
Assessor's Office ceased that policy upon the Board's recent amendment
allowing an extension to the end of the tax year.
'Paul D. Patten 1923:55882.1(55875.1)
Yes I J No
Attachments:
I
Real Estate Assessment
0 004~
Meetin Date:
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
January 23, 2002 Item Number:
Page 2 of 2
Even with this extension, however, some Program participants cannot meet
the deadline when they make property changes on the last few days of the tax
year. For example, the Assessor's Office recently became aware of a
participant who recorded a deed on December 28, 2001 changing his property
acreage who did not have a reasonable opportunity to file a new application.
In addition, four other participants missed the deadline for other reasons.
Program participants who fail to meet the deadline are dropped from the
Program and must pay full market-value taxes on their property for the next
tax year even if the property otherwise meets the Program requirements.
State law allows, and staff recommends, that the Board adopt the attached
ordinance amendment that would extend the deadline to file an application
until thirty days after the County mails notices of real estate assessments.
This mailing usually occurs around January 15th of the new year, thereby
extending the deadline to approximately February 14th. The applicant would
need to pay an extension fee of $25 which would be in addition to the already
enacted late fee of $25.
Staff further recommends that the Board adopt the ordinance on an
emergency basis so that participants who missed the deadline for this tax
year will be able to file an application within thirty days after the mailing
of the assessments. The Board may adopt the ordinance without a public
hearing on an emergency basis. However, the ordinance must be advertised and
readopted after a public hearing in accordance with normal ordinance adoption
procedures. Staff recommends that the Board schedule a public hearing for
February 13, 2002 for the purpose of readopting the ordinance.
0 0049
AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE CODE OF THE
COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD, 1997, AS AMENDED BY
AMENDING AND RE-ENACTING SECTION 9-18 RELATING
TO LAND USE TAXATION APPLICATIONS
BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County:
That Section 9-18 of the Code of the Coun_tv of Chesterfield, 1997, as amended, is
amended and re-enacted to read as follows:
Sec. 9-18. Applications--Required.
(a) The owner of any real estate meeting the criteria set forth in Code of Virginia, §§
58.1-3230 and 58.1-3233(2), may, at least 60 days preceding the tax year for which such taxation
is sought, apply to the county assessor for the classification, assessment and taxation of such
property for the next succeeding tax year on the basis of its use, under the procedures set forth in
Code of Virginia, § 58.1-3236, provided that in any year in which a general reassessment is being
made the property owner may submit such application until the later of 30 days have elapsed after
his notice of increase in assessment is mailed in accordance with the Code of Virginia, §
58.1-3330, or 60 days preceding the tax year. The application shall be on forms provided by the
state department of taxation and supplied by the county assessor and shall include such additional
schedules, photographs and drawings as may be required by the county assessor. An application
fee of $10.00 shall accompany each application. In addition, an application may be filed within no
more than sixty days after the filing deadline specified herein upon payment of a late filing fee of
$25.00. Further, an application may be filed not later than thirty days after notices of assessments
are mailed upon payment of a further extension fee of $25.00.
(b) A separate application shall be filed for each parcel on the land book.
ooo
(2) That this ordinance shall become effective immediately upon adoption.
1923:55875.1
1/10/02 10:20 AM
0 9650
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Page 1 of ~'2
Meetin~l Date:
Subiect:
Januar~ 23, 2002 Item Number:
Transfer of Capital Improvement Reserve for School
Construction to Bailey Bridge Middle School
8.D. 1.
County Administrator's Comments:
County Administrator: ~
Board Action Requested:(.//
The School Board requests the Board of Supervisors to transfer $134,000
from the Capital Improvement Reserve for School Construction to the Bailey
Bridge Middle School project for the design contract.
Summary of Information:
On September 12, 2001, Chesterfield County Public Schools received four
proposals for architectural services for the additions and renovations to
Bailey Bridge Middle School. The architectural selection committee selected
Mosely Harris & McClintock. The committee, Moseley Harris & McClintock, and
school administrative staff worked to determine the scope of the work.
After reviewing the limits of work for the project, Moseley Harris &
McClintock submitted a proposal for architectural services for $376,850,
including site work. On January 8, 2002, the School Board approved this
proposal.
The Bailey Bridge Middle School project currently has an appropriation of
$250,000 appropriated from year-end surplus. Additional funds are needed to
cover the above-mentioned contract and other costs. The current balance in
the Capital Improvement Reserve for School Construction is $190,287;
therefore, a transfer of $134,000 for this project would leave a balance of
$56,287 in the Reserve.
Preparer' ~~,d/~. D.
Attachments: Yes J----J No
Title: Superintendent
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Page 2 of 2
Meetino Date: January 23. 2002 Number
Budget and Management Comments:
The Board of Supervisors appropriated use of $250,000 in FY01 tax
surplus on September 26, 2001 to begin the design phase of the Bailey
Bridge Renovation/Addition Project. On January 8, 2002 the School Board
approved a design contract with Mosely Harris & McClintock for this
project and additional design funding and other costs such as
construction management fees need to be covered. Therefore, the School
Board is requesting that $134,000 be transferred to the Bailey Bridge
Renovation Project from the School's Capital Project Reserve. The
balance in the School CIP Reserve is $190,287; transfer of $134,000
will leave a balance of $56,287.
Preparer:
Rebecca T. Dickson
Title: Director, Budget & Management
VIRGINIA: At a regular meeting of the
Chesterfield County School Board held
Tuesday evening, January 8, 2002, at
seven-thirty o'clock in the Public Meeting
Room of the Chesterfield County
Courthouse Complex
PRESENT:
James R. Schroeder, D.D.S., Chairman
Elizabeth B. Davis, Vice-Chairman
Lloyd A. Lenhart
Dianne E. Pettitt
Marshall W. Trammell, Jr.
RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, the School Board and County Board of Supervisors have agreed to begin the
Bailey Bridge Middle additions and renovations project as soon as possible due to
overcrowding at that facility; and, WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors appropriated
$250,000 of FY2001 additional property taxes for this purpose; and, WHEREAS, the balance
in the Capital Improvement Reserve for School Construction was $190,287 at June 30, 2001;
and, WHEREAS, the contract for architectural services needs to be awarded in the amount of
$376,850 and funds need to be made available to cover other minor project costs (i.e.
construction management charges, advertising); and, WHEREAS, additional funding of
$134,000 is needed to cover the contract and other costs leaving a balance of $56,287 in the
Capital Improvement Reserve for School Construction; NOW THEREFORE BE IT
RF~OLVED, that on motion of Mr. Trammell, seconded by Mr. Lenhart, the School Board
does hereby request the County Board of Supervisors to approve the transfer of $134,000 from
the Capital Improvement Reserve for School Construction to the Bailey Bridge Middle
additions and renovations project in the School Capital Improvements Fund.
Patricia W. Bartlam, Clerk
Bi~ ~. Cannaday, Jr., ~u~lrnt~ndent
0 O05B
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Page I of 2
Meetin~l Date: Januaq/23, 2002
Item Number: 8.D. 2.a.
Subject:
Set Public Hearing Regarding Revisions to the Zoning
Ordinance Site Plan Review Processes and Associated Appeals
Processes
County Administrator's Comments:
County Administrator: ~
Board Action Requested:
S~t February 13, 2002, for a public hearing on revisions to the
Zoning Ordinance Site Plan Review Processes and Associated
Appeals Processes.
Summary of Information:
The primary changes proposed are:
o
3.
4.
5.
Modify site plan review and appeal processes to meet
State Code for the length of time that a final decision
must be rendered on the review of a site plan.
Provide an appeal process for the minor site plan
process.
Establish a list of issues for an approved site plan
which can be appealed to the Planning Commission.
Define who is an aggrieved property owner who can appeal
an approved site plan to the Planning Commission.
Require certain adjusted site plans to be reviewed and
approved by the Planning Commission.
Preparer:
These changes were discussed with the development community at
the December quarterly development meeting and received a
favorable response. The Planning Commission at their December
public hearing recommended approval to the attached amendments
to the site plan section of the Zoning Ordinance. A more
complete explanation of the changes proposed is attached
preceding the proposed ordinance attached.
Attachments:
Thomas E. Jacobson
Yes ~ No
Title: Director of Planning
C:DATAJAG ENDA/2002/JAN2302.1/GOK
# 0 0054
SITE PLAN PROCESS AND APPEALS:
PROPOSED CHANGES TO ZONING ORDINANCE (1/9/02)
Listed below are issues that staff is recommending be addressed through changes in the Zoning Ordinance
ISSUE 1: Length of reviews not to extend beyond 60 days.
By State Code, each review of a site plan should not exceed 60 days from the date a site plan
is submitted. This includes time for staff review, the filing of an appeal, and the plan to be
heard bY the Planning Commission for a final determination. The following language from
the Ordinance affects this overall time schedule:
Administrative site plan review time - Sec. 19-268(c)
Time period for filing an appeal - Sec. 19-268(d)
Time for Commission to hear appeal - Sec. 19-268(d)
60 days
15 days*
60 days**
(* Proposed Ordinance change will reduce this to ten (10) days.)
(** Proposed Ordinance change will require the sixty (60) days to be measured from the date
of plan submittal and not from the date an appeal is filed.)
Most site plans have their final submittal through the Table Review process, which is a one
day turnaround for review and approval. Adding 10 more days for the filing of an appeal
leaves 49 days for staff to bring the appeal to the Commission. This allows the hearing to
occur at a regularly scheduled Planning Commission meeting.
However, if staff approves the site plan at the end of a regular review period (21 days or
more), then an appeal at the end of 10 days may not leave enough time for the appeal to be
heard at a regularly scheduled Planning Commission meeting. Under this scenario, a special
meeting of the Planning Commission would be required to have the final decision rendered
within 60 days of the site plan submission.
ISSUE 2: Fast Track Projects limited by 21 days of public notice prior to approval.
Section 19-265(b) is proposed to allow a site plan to be approved 10 days after written
notification has been sent to adjacent property owners. However, Ordinance retains ability of
an aggrieved property owner to request that the Planning Department use a 21 day public
notice period upon receipt of a written request.
0
SITE PLAN PROCESS AND APPEALS - 1/9/02 - page 2
ISSUE 3: Minor Site Plans cannot be approved if applicant is unable to provide signed receipts of
registered mail sent to adjacent residential properties.
Section 19-266(e) has been changed to allow staff to approve a minor site plan 15 days after
the notice has been sent by registered mail.
ISSUE 4: Minor Site Plan process cannot be used if adjacent residential property owner objects to the
use of the process.
Section 19-266(e) has been changed to delete this restriction and a site plan appeal process
has been added for minor site plans in Section 19-267(g).
ISSUE 5: Zoning Ordinance is not clear as to what issues on a site plan can be appealed.
Section 19-268(d) establishes the list of appealable issues as follows:
(1) designation of Chesapeake Bay Preservation areas;
(2) access and internal circulation;
(3) improvement sketch processing;
(4) location of water and sewer lines;
(5) buffers and screening;
(6) land use transitions;
(7) drainage;
(8) conditions of zoning approval; or
(9) architectural treatment.
ISSUE 6: Zoning Ordinance does not clearly define who is an aggrieved property owner who has an
ability to appeal an approved site plan to the Planning Commission
Section 19-268.1 defines who is "aggrieved" as follows:
(a) A person is "aggrieved"for the purpose of appealing an administratively approved
site plan only if:
1. They are an owner of property adjacent to the site; or
S1TE PLAN PROCESS AND APPEALS - 1/9/02 - page 3
They will be adversely affected by the approval of the site plan in an
immediate and substantial manner not shared by the public generally.
A person shall not be considered adversely affectedforpurposes of this ordinance by
any personal financial hardship anticipated as a result of business competition
associated with the proposed use.
(b)
When an appeal is filed with the Director of Planning, he will forward a copy to the
County Attorney's office that same day for a determination whether the applicant is
an "aggrieved person". Applicants will be sent by first class mail written
notification if they are determined not to be aggrieved. Such notification shall be
sent within 3 business days, and shall advise the applicant of available appeal rights.
ISSUE 7:
Site plan adjustments to approved site plans are not allowed an appeal right by aggrieved
persons. In some instances, such adjustments may affect a case that was originally heard by
the Planning Commission or affect an agreement made with adjacent property owners. The
Ordinance needs language that allows aggrieved persons participation in these circumstances.
Section 19-271 provides new language as follows that would require such adjustments to be
heard by the Planning Commission:
After a site plan has been approved, minor adjustments to the site plan which comply with
the purposes of this article and other provisions of this chapter, with the intent of the
approving bodies in their approval of site plans, and with the general purpose of the
comprehensive plan for development of the area may be approved by the director of planning
with concurrence of the reviewing authorities concerned.
However, this administrative adjustment process is not available for changes that were
involved in an appeal or were made as part of an agreement with an adjacent property
owner or that relate to a condition of zoning requiring planning commission review and
approval. Deviation from an approved site plan without the written approval of the director
of planning shall void the plan and the director of planning shall require the applicant to
submit a new site plan for consideration.
000D'7
AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE CODE OF THE
COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD, 1997, AS AMENDED BY
AMENDING AND RE-ENACTING SECTIONS 19-26, 19-265, 19-266, 19-267, 19-268,
19-269, 19-270 and 19-271 AND ADDING SECTION 19-268.1
RELATING TO SITE PLAN ORDINANCE CHANGES
BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County:
(1) That Sections 19-26, 19-265, 19-266, 19-267, 19-268, 19-269, 19-270 and 19-271 of the
Code of the County of Cheste _r[ield, 1997, as amended, are amended and re-enacted and Section 19-268.1 is
added to read as follows:
Sec. 19-26. Hearings; notification and posting of property.
(a) The adoption of any comprehensive plan, zoning district map or ordinance or amendment
thereto; any request for zoning approval; appeal of a decision by the planning director or other administrative
officer to the board of zoning appeals; application for interpretation of the district map to the board of zoning
appeals; or application for creation of a historic district, or the designation of landmark and landmark sites
shall be advertised by reference, giving a descriptive summary of the proposed action and the place or places
within the county where copies of the proposed action may be examined. In the case of proposed action
which involves an amendment to the zoning district map, the public notice shall state the general usage and
density range of the proposed amendment and the general usage and density, if any, set forth in the
applicable part of the comprehensive plan. None of the above-referenced actions shall be acted upon until
notice of the intention to do so has been published once a week for two successive weeks in a newspaper
published or having general circulation in the county. Such notices shall specify the time and place of
hearing at which persons affected may appear and present their views, and such heating shall be held not less
than six days nor more than 21 days after final publication.
(b) The director of planning shall, at least 21 days before the date of the first hearing on any
request for zoning,~^~ ,,,~ ~ .... ,-~--,r----~.-,~ ..... ~ apprc, val, or appeal of a decision by the planning director or other
administrative officer to the board of zoning appeals, post on the land or building involved in any application
or appeal, a notice of the public hearing as follows:
(1)
The notice shall be posted at reasonable intervals along streets abutting the subject property,
or, if there is no abutting street, then at the proposed public street entrance to the property.
The notice shall be posted in locations so as to be reasonably visible from public roads.
(2) Neither the holding of any public hearing, nor the validity of any action on an application or an
appeal, shall be affected by the unauthorized removal of a notice which has been duly posted in
accordance with this section.
0 O05b
(c) (1) With regard to any action referred to in subsection (a) above, except amendments
to the comprehensive plan, the owner of the affected parcel, as identified in the assessor's
records, and the property owners identified in section 19-24(c) shall be given not less than 15
days' written notice sent by registered, certified or first class mall for any hearing on any such
action. If the written notice is provided by first class mail, the director of planning shall make
affidavit that the mailings have been made and file the affidavit with the papers in the case. If
the public hearing is continued or deferred to a date that has not previously been advertised,
notice shall be remailed. If the public hearing is continued or deferred to a date that has been
previously advertised or if the public hearing is closed and the decision deferred to a later
date, notice need not be remailed.
(2)
With regard to any action referred to in sections 19-16 and 19-17, written notice of any
public hearing on an application to amend a zoning condition or rezone property shall be
given to the last known representatives of all civic associations on the Civic Association
Notice List filed with the planning department operating within the area encompassed by the
property which is subject to the original zoning or condition and to all property owners of
record with the assessor's office whose property was subject to the original zoning or
condition and whose property is located within 1,500 feet of the property which is the subject
of the application.
(d) When a proposed comprehensive plan or amendment thereto, a proposed change in zoning
district map classification, an application for creation of a historic district or the designation of landmarks
and landmark sites or an application for special exception or variance involves any parcel of land located
within one-half mile of a boundary of an adjoining county or municipality, then, in addition to the
advertising and written notification required above, written notice shall also be given at least 15 days before
the hearing to the chief administrative officer or his designee, of such adjoining county or municipality.
(e) Posting and notification of adjacent property owners, as outlined in this section, shall not be
required when: (i) the hearing involves an application for zoning approval of 26 or more parcels of land
initiated by resolution of the planning commission or board of supervisors; or (ii) on appeal when the appeal
involves 26 or more parcels of land; or (iii) the hearing involves an appeal concerning no specific property.
(f) A party shall be deemed to have waived the right to challenge the validity of proceedings for
which written notice is required if the party does not receive the required written notice, but the party has
actual notice of, or actively participates in, the proceedings.
000
Sec. 19-265. Site plan processing.
(a) At the time a site plan is submitted, the applicant shall elect whether to seek approval under
the minor site plan review process, set forth in section 19-267, the administrative site plan review process set
forth in section 19-268 or the planning commission site plan review process set forth in section 19-269. If
the applicant fails to make a selection, his application will be processed under the administrative site plan
review process unless a condition of zoning approval requires the site plan to be submitted to the planning
commission.
0 O05L
(b) The director of planning shall send written notice of site plan submission to adjacent property
owners by registered, certified or first class mail as soon after site plan submission as practicable, but in no
event less than g-l- 10 days prior to approval or disapproval of the site plan. The minimum period for site plan
approval shall be extended to 21 days when an aggrieved person, as defined by Sec. 19-268.1, files a written
request with the Planning Department within 10 days after written notice is sent. If such written notice is
sent by first class mail, the director of planning shall make affidavit that such notice has been sent and shall
file the affidavit with the application. This subsection shall not be applicable to those site plans which are
approved pursuant to the minor site plan review process.
Sec. 19-266. Uses eligible for the minor site plan review process.
The director of planning may approve site plans through the minor site plan review process in
accordance with recommendations by other departments, as necessary, if the following conditions are met:
(a) The proposed building addition or land disturbed is between 2,500 and 10,000 square feet;
(b) Main water and/or sewer extensions are not required;
(c) Industrial uses have independent water supplies sufficient for fire suppression;
(d)
All requisite reviews by the Virginia Department of Transportation can be performed by
Residency Office msidem staff;
(e)
The use is not located adjacent to property zoned R, R-TH or R-MF or occupied by a
residence unless such adjacent property owners are notified by the applicant by registered
mail, return receipt requested, of the proposed minor site plan "--~
~.~-^- ~.. ~h~ ~ .... ~ ~ ..... :~u ,u~ a~,~ ~,, ~._.;.~. The director of planning, may
approve such plan no sooner than 15 days after the applicant sends all required notification.q
by registered mail .... ~* ~ *~ ~ ~.~ ~* ....... :~.~ ~' .... - ..... -~ ........... .n o~_
(f)
The site plan shall not contain substantial access changes, road improvements or internal
traffic circulation changes;
(gh) Required buffers are not affected by proposed improvements or do not require substantial
modification;
(hi,) Drainage improvements do not require dedication of easements to the county; and
The site complies with Chesapeake Bay regulations, either by opting out of the Chesapeake
Bay requirements, conforming by use of an existing BMP or by achieving reduced
imperviousness.
0 oOGO
Sec. 19-267. Minor site plan review process.
(a) The applicant shall submit a preliminary site plan to the director of planning for a
determination of eligibility for the minor site plan review process.
(b) If the site plan meets the criteria set forth in sections 19-264(d) and 19-266 it shall be
forwarded to other departments within the county for review, as necessary. In the event the proposed site
plan does not rneet the eligibility requirements for the minor site plan review process, the applicant shall be
advised to elect between the administrative site plan review process set forth in section 19-268 or the
planning commission site plan review process set forth in section 19-269.
(c) Upon approval, the applicant shall be provided two copies of the approved site plan and shall
be required to maintain one copy on the site at all times.
(d) If the site plan is approved pursuant to this section, the applicant shall not be required to pay
site plan or erosion and sediment control fees.
(.e.f) The director of planning shall approve or disapprove a site plan pursuant to this section in
accordance with the reviewing authorities' recommendations. He shall notify the applicant of his decision to
approve or disapprove the site plan no sooner than -';*u;
....... n 15 days after the applicant sends all notifications
required by 19-266(e) by registered mail ~: ,u~ ,~.,~ ~r ~,,~.~; ~: ^~ ~,,u~ ~ n~ ;~, .... ,:,,.1.1o Te rtl di
........................u.. -- · v .... ,--v ............ e rector
of planning fails to approve or disapprove the site plan within 60 days after it has been officially submitted
for approval, the applicant, after ten days' written notice to the director of planning, may petition the circuit
court to decide whether the site plan should or should not be approved. The cc'.:x shall hear the matter and
f(~g) If the applicant disagrees with the director of planning's final decision, he may file a written
appeal with the planning commission within 15 days of that decision. The commission shall fix a reasonable
time for hearing of the appeal and decide the same within 60 days. The commission may affirm, modify or
reverse the decision. Until the planning commission renders a decision, r,...:~
...... · , .... er-,,-- t~-,od the director
of planning shall not approve the site plan or a building permit for any construction that wo'al~ or could be
affected by the appeal.
f~ Persons with an interest in property adjacent to the site and zoned R, R-TH, R-MF or
0¢copicd by a residence may file a written appeal within 10 days of the decision. Appeals must relate to
matters specified in § 19-268(d). The Commission shall fix a reasonable time for hearing the appeal and
decide the same within 60 days of the applicant's site plan submission. The Commission may affirm,
modify or reverse the decision. Until the planning commission renders a decision, neither a building tx~rmit
nor a land disturbance permit shall be issued for any construction that could be affected by the ap~x~al..In
addition, the director of planning shall issue a stop work order to the applicant instructing the applicant to
cease any construction that could be affected by the appeal.
0 006l
Sec. 19-268. Administrative site plan review process.
(a) All site plans which are properly submitted for administrative review in accordance with the
County' s Site Plan Application and Checklist shall be reviewed and recommended for approval or denial by:
(1) The director of planning relative to:
Compliance with the requirements of this chapter, including, but not limited to,
setbacks, side and rear yards, building height, lot area and lot coverage, fencing,
screening, landscaping, lighting, architectural design, pedestrian access and
conditions of zoning approval.
Location, design and adequacy of automobile parking as to number of spaces, and
square footage per space, including movement lanes and total area.
(2) The director of transportation relative to:
Location and design of vehicular entrances and exits in relation to streets giving
access to the site.
Adequate provision for internal and external traffic circulation, including, but not
limited to, access to adjoining property, traffic-control devices and speed control
devices.
(3) The Virginia Department of Transportation engineer relative to highway matters.
(4) The director of environmental engineering relative to:
a. Adequacy of drainage and erosion control measures.
b. Flood protection.
Co
Compliance with applicable established design criteria, construction standards and
specifications for all required public road and drainage improvements.
do
Compliance with the regulations and requirements of the Chesapeake Bay
preservation areas, Upper Swift Creek watershed areas and floodplain districts.
(5) The director of utilities relative to:
a. Adequacy of water supply and sanitary wastewater facilities.
Compliance with applicable established design criteria, construction standards and
specifications for all required public water and wastewater improvements.
(6)
The building official relative to fire protection and compliance with the provisions of the
county fire prevention code and the Uniform Statewide Building Code.
(7) The director of health relative to private wastewater and water systems.
(8) The chief of police relative to police protection and county safety codes.
(b) The director of planning shall post a sign notifying the public of site plan submission for
administrative review as soon as practicable, but in no event less than g-l- 10 days prior to approval or
disapproval of the site plan. The minimum period for site plan approval shall be extended to 21 days when
an aggrieved person, as defined by Sec. 19-268.1, files a written request with the Planning Department
within 10 days after the sign has been posted. Such posting shall be performed in the same manner required
for public hearings described in section 19-26(b)(1) and (2).
(c) The director of planning shall approve or disapprove site plans in writing, giving specific
reasons in accordance with the reviewing authorities' recommendations. He shall notify the applicant of his
decision to approve or disapprove the site plan within 30 days of the date of submission of the plan, if
practicable. If the director of planning fails to approve or disapprove the site plan within 60 days after it has
been officially submitted for approval, the applicant, after ten days' written notice to the director of planning,
may petition the cimuit court to decide whether the site plan should or should not be approved. :r-he-eeu~
(d) If the applicant disagrees with the final decision of the director of planning, he may file a
written appeal with the planning commission within 15 days of that decision. In addition, any aggrieved
person may file a written appeal of the final decision of the director of planning with the planning
commission within 10 days of that decision. The appeal must explain how the site plan will adversely affect
the person and is limited to the following matters:
(1) designation of Chesapeake Bay Preservation areas;
(2) access and intemal circulation;
improvement sketch processing;
location of water and sewer lines;
buffers and screening;
land use transitions~
f7) .. drainage;
conditions of zoning approval; or
(9) architectural treatment.
""~ Imnd .... * .... ;,;._. The co~ssion shall fix a reasonable time for he~ng the ap~ ~d ~i~ the
sine within 60 days of the applicant's site pl~ sub~ssion. The co~ssion may affim, modify or mve~
0 0063
the decision. Until the planning commission renders a decision, Du~ng *~'.,., ...... ,-re-,--' v-,--,-~"~'4"~ ~
~1.~.1~ ~1~,1
~- ........ +!-,~ ~;*,~ ..~ .... neither a building permit nor a land disturbance permit shall be
issued for any construction that wau!d or could be affected by the appeal. In addition, the director of
planning shall issue a stop work order to the applicant instructing the applicant to cease any construction that
could be affected by the appeal.
Sec. 19-268.1.Qualification as "A~grieved Person".
(a)
only if:
A person is "aggrieved" for the purpose of appealing an administratively approved site plan
They are an owner or lessee of property adjacent to the site; or
They will be adversely affected by the approval of the site plan in an immediate and
substantial manner not shared by the public generally,
A person shall not be considered adversely affected for purposes of this ordinance by any personal financial
hardship anticipated as a result of business competition associated with the proposed use.
(b) When an appeal is filed with the Director of Planning, he will forward a copy to the County
Attorney's office that same day for a determination whether the applicant is an "aggrieved person".
Applicants will be sent by first class mail written notification if they are determined not to be aggrieved-
Such notification shall be sent within 3 business days, and shall advise the applicant of available appeal
rights.
Sec. 19-269. Planning commission site plan review process.
All site plans which are properly submitted for planning commission review in accordance with the
County's Site Plan Application and Checklist shall be reviewed and approved or denied as follows:
(a)
The appropriate departments and/or agencies shall review and make recommendations as
outlined in section 19-268(a).
(b)
The director of planning shall post a notice of the site plan public meeting heem~ in
accordance with section 19-26(b).
(c)
The director of planning shall submit recommendations to the planning commission, The
planning commission shall approve, with or without conditions, or disapprove the site plan in
writing, giving specific reasons in accordance with the reviewing authorities'
recommendations.
(d)
If the planning commission fails to approve or disapprove the proposed site plan within 60
days after it has been officially submitted for approval, the applicant, after ten days' notice to
the commission, may petition the circuit court to decide whether the site plan should or
should not be approved .v,. ....... ~.~, ~ a.~ ~.~, .... .~ ~-~ ...... .~. a.~, :t ~m
v---v-,-...---,.. -..,-2 -..,--,-,--, ----,-,-,--~, -vv.,, .,- ,,- ,-,, an.
(e) If the applicant disagrees with the final decision of the planning commission, he may file a written
appeal with the circuit court within 60 days of that decision. ............ 1-- ..-1,,.11~-1 .... , any.~-~.~ .... .....'~ pzraon .... F;I~ II
0 0064
Sec. 19-270. Site plan approval.
(a) An approved site plan shall become null and void if no significant work is done or
development is made on the site within five years after final site plan approval.
(b) There shall be no cleating or grading of any site without approval of a grading and/or erosion
and sediment control plan by the director of planning and the director of environmental engineering.
Construction or development may begin upon approval of the site plan by the director of planning and of
building permits by the building official.
(c)
(1) Prior to expiration of an approved site plan, the subdivider or developer may request
and the director of planning may grant one or more extensions of such approval for
additional periods as the director may determine to be reasonable, taking into consideration
the size and phasing of the proposed development and the laws, ordinances and regulations in
effect at the time of the request.
(2) If the director of planning denies an extension request, the applicant may file a written
appeal with the planning commission within 15 days of the denial. The commission shall fix
a reasonable time for heating the appeal and decide the same within 60 days. The
commission may affirm, modify or reverse the decision.
Sec. 19.271. Adjustments in approved site plan.
After a site plan has been approved, minor adjustments to the site plan which comply with the
purposes of this article and other provisions of this chapter, with the intent of the approving bodies in their
approval of site plans, and with the general purpose of the comprehensive plan for development of the area
may be approved by the director of planning with concurrence of the reviewing authorities concerned.
However, this administrative adjustment process is not available for changes that were involved in an
appeal or were made as part of an agreement with an adjacent property owner or that relate to a condition of
zonina requiring planning commission review and approval. Deviation from an approved site plan without
the written approval of the director of planning shall void the plan and the director of planning shall require
the applicant to submit a new site plan for consideration.
(2)
That this ordinance shall become effective immediately upon adoption.
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Page I of I
Meetin~l Date: January/23, 2002
Item Number: 8.D. 2.b.
Subiect: Set Date for Public Hearing for Consideration of the Siting of a
Solid Waste Management Facility, as Well as Approval for Waste Material
Management and Disposal, for the Proposed Expansion of the Taylor Road
Construction and Demolition Debris Landfill Owned By S. B. Cox, Inc.
County Administrator's Comments: ,,, ,
County Administrator: (~
Board Action Requeste t public hearing for February 13, 2002 to consider the
siting of, and the management and disposal of waste material within a
proposed expansion of Taylor Road construction and demolition debris landfill
Summan/of Information: Under the County Code every solid waste landfill
facility, or the expansion of such facility, must receive the approval of the
Board of Supervisors both as to the siting of the facility and the management
and disposal operations of the facility. Joyce Engineering has submitted an
application for these approvals to expand the S. B. Cox, Inc. construction
and demolition debris landfill located on Taylor Road, and owned and operated
by S. B. Cox, Inc. After review of the application by staff and by a
consultant engineer (Law-Gibb Engineering), and following modifications by
Joyce Engineering to address concerns raised during the review, the
application is now complete and meets all requirements of the County Code.
Staff, as well as Law-Gibb, find that the proposed facility poses no
substantial present or potential danger to the health, safety, or welfare of
any person or to the environment. Therefore it is the recommendation of the
Solid Waste Division that the applicant be given both siting and
management/disposal approval for this facility. This expansion concurrently
being reviewed also requires zoning approval and the Planning Commission
unanimously recommended approval of the rezoning. There was no public
opposition. The Board will hold a public hearing at this meeting to consider
the rezoning request. Staff recommends that the siting and
management/disposal public hearing be set for the Board's February 13, 2002
meeting.
Preparer:
Attachments:
Yes [-~ No
Title: Director of General Services
0400(22) :55945. i
Executive Summary
S. B. Cox, Inc. is proposing to expand the existing landfill operations at the
Taylor Road Construction and Demolition Debris (CDD) Landfill, Permit No. 270, onto
adjacent property located south and southwest of the existing facility in the Matoaca
Magisterial District of Chesterfield County, Virginia.
Based on the results of a subsurface investigation performed between August and
September 2001, the study area has been determined to be geologically suitable for the
proposed landfill expansion based on Chesterfield County and DEQ siting criteria.
Evaluation of the hydrogeologic and geochemical nature of the uppermost aquifer
indicates that a groundwater monitoring system can be designed for the facility, which
will successfully monitor the uppermost aquifer in accordance with Chesterfield County
and DEQ requirements. Based on the investigative results, a preliminary footprint for
two proposed expansion areas has been devised which meets all set-back and buffer
requirements specified in the Chesterfield County Administrative Code and the VSWMR.
As part of this permit amendment, S.B. Cox, Inc. is proposing to expand the
existing facility boundary from 73 acres to approximately 158 acres. The landfill is
situated on a 257-acre parcel of land owned by S.B. Cox, Inc. Currently, 73 acres of the
parcel are approved for waste management activities under the existing permit. The
proposed lateral expansion (85 additional acres proposed) under this Part A Application
will expand the area allowed for waste management activities to 158 acres. Of the 158
acres, waste disposal activities are proposed for 137 acres, with the remaining 21 acres
reserved for access roads, buildings, leachate management systems, and storm water
conveyance and control systems.
It is anticipated that development of the expansion area will be sequential, i.e.,
each cell will be developed to the fullest extent possible prior to moving disposal
activities to a subsequent cell. The anticipated sequence of site development will include
four separate phases of development. Although the proposed expansion will result in an
increased disposal capacity of the landfill, S. B. Cox, Inc. is not requesting any increase
in the daily disposal volume other than an estimated two percent annual growth
(estimated based on the projected population growth rate and increasing construction
demands for the Taylor Road CDD Landfill service area). The proposed expansion is
consistent with the Central Virginia Solid Waste Management Plan, of which
Chesterfield County is a member.
Based on the information presented herein, the proposed expansion meets state
and local government landfill siting criteria. The proposed expansion is expected to
provide economic benefit to the citizens and businesses of Chesterfield County through
the creation of additional disposal capacity for construction and land clearing debris at a
competitive cost. Based on the current availability of airspace in existing CDD landfills,
which are open to the public and centrally located in or near Chesterfield County, and the
continuing development of the southern and western portions of Chesterfield County, it is
expected that disposal costs for construction and land clearing debris will increase in the
near future if new capacity is not added into the system.
The design, construction and operation of this expansion will fall under the
oversight and inspection of DEQ, just as the existing cell has to date. Further, the
expansion must proceed through the same standard DEQ Part A and Part B Application
process required of new proposed sites. This review step, required by Chesterfield
County Code, is just the first step of a multi-step process designed to protect the health
and safety of the citizens and the environment.
0 0068
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Page 1 of I
Meeting Date: January 23, 2002
Item Number: e.D.3.
Subject:
Request to Quitclaim a Sixteen Foot Sewer Easement Across Property
of Rudolph, Inc. and Alice M. Rudolph t/a Rudolph Construction
Company
County Administrator's Comments:
Coun~ Administrator: ~
Board ActionRequested: Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors authorize
t~e Chairman of the Board of Supervisors and the County Administrator to
execute quitclaim deeds to vacate a 16' sewer easement across property of
Rudolph, Inc. and Alice M. Rudolph t/a Rudolph Construction Company.
Summary of Information:
Balzer and Associates, Inc. has requested the quitclaim of a 16' sewer
easement across property of Rudolph, Inc. and Alice M. Rudolph t/a Rudolph
Construction Company as shown on the attached plat. New easements will be
dedicated to replace this easement. Staff has reviewed the request and
recommends approval.
District: Dale
Preparer: c::::~,.~ 71. ~~
J~hn W. Harmon
Attachments:
Yes ~ No
Title:
Right of Way Mana,qer
0 0069
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Page 1 of 1
Meeting Date: January 23, 2002
Item Number: 8.D. 4.
Su~ect: State Road Acceptance
County Administrator's Comments:
County Administrator: ~/~
Board Action Requested.'~?
Summary of Information:
BERMUDA: Amstel Bluff, Sec. E
CLOVERHILL: Providence Creek, Sec.
E
Preparer: F~I~'~~''
Attachments: Yes
Title: Director of Environmental Engineering
#
TO: Board of Supervisors
FROM: ~ of Environnental Engin~
SIJBJF_LT: State Road Acceptance - AMSTEL BLUFF, SEC. E
DISTRICT: Berrauda
MEbTI'ING DATE: 23 January 2002
ROADS FOR CONSIDERATION:
HIGHCREST RIDGE DR
SANDROCK RIDGE DR
Vicinity Map: AMSTEL BLUFF, SEC. E
Produced by Cheste~dd Co~ty ets
0 0072
TO: Board of Superviso~
FROM~ Departrmnt of Environtmntal Engineering
SUB~: State Road Acceptance - PROVIDENCE CR~, SEC. E
DISTRICT: CLOVER HII,I,
~G DATE: 23 3anuary 2002
ROADS FOR CONSIDERATION:
CR~'7< BOTIDM ~
CP.~BOTIOMWAY
PROVIDENCE CREEK CIR
PROVIDI!!NCE CREEK RD
PROVIDENCE GLEN TN
W PROVIDENCE RD
Vicinity Map: PROVDENCE CREEK, SEC. E
0 0073
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Page I of '~
Meeting Date: January 23, 2002
Item Number'
Subject:
Appropriate Juvenile Accountability Incentive Block Grant Funds from the
Department of Criminal Justice Services
County Administrator's Comments:
County Administrator: ~
Board Action Requested:
Authorize Human Services Administration to receive $46,919 in Juvenile
Accountability Block Grant (JAIBG) funds from the Department of Criminal
Justice Services and authorize an increase in appropriations by $46,919.
Summary of Information:
The Department of Criminal Justice services has allocated $46,919 in JAIBG
grant funds to Chesterfield County and the City of Colonial Heights. The
JAIBG program is intended to address juvenile crime by promoting greater
accountability in the juvenile justice system. A multi-disciplinary committee
of the Community Criminal Justice Board develops the plan for the program.
Preparer:
Bradford S. Hammer
Titl~
Deputy County Administrator
Attachments:
Yes
No
# 0 0074
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Page 2 of 2
Meetino Date: January 23. 2002 Number
Bud.qet and Mana.qement Comments:
This item requests authorization from the Board for acceptance and
appropriation of funds awarded by the Department of Criminal Justice
Services from its Juvenile Accountability Incentive Block Grant (JAIBG)
in the amount of $46,919. The grant period is January 1, 2002, through
December 31, 2002, and must be renewed annually. The grant requires a
$5,213 local match. This match has been identified from Virginia
Juvenile Community Crime Control Act (VJCCCA) funds.
Preparer:
(~',/C~ ~, '-~l'd~---~ Title: Director, Budget & Mana,qement
Rebecca T. Dickson
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Page I of 2
Meetin~l Date: January 23, 2002
Item Number: 8.D.6.a.
Subiect:
Approval of the Purchase of a Parcel of Land for River's Bend Fire
Station #18
County Administrator's Comments:
County Administrator: (~
Board Action Requeste~. Approve the purchase of a parcel of land conta±n±ng 4.022
acres, more or less, for $400,000.00, from Meadowville, LLC, for River's Bend
Fire Station, #18; authorize the County Administrator to execute the sales
contract and deed; declare parcel 815653188800000 surplus and offer the
property for sale; initiate an application to rezone parcel 820651606400000
to 0-2; and, appoint Mike Hatton, Battalion Chief, as the Board's agent.
Summary of Information.
Staff requests that the Board of Supervisors approve the purchase of a parcel
of land containing 4.022 acres, more or less, on Bermuda Hundred Road, for
$400,000.00, plus closing costs which are estimated to be $10,000.00, from
Meadowville, LLC, for River's Bend Fire Station, #18; initiate an application
to rezone the property to 0-2; and, appoint Mike Hatton, Battalion Chief, as
the Board's agent. The purchase is subject to obtaining the necessary zoning
and approvals to use the property as a fire station site. Parcel
815653188800000 was conveyed as a proffer for the River's Bend development
however, the community supports the new site. Staff requests that the
proceeds from the sale be applied to the project.
Approval is recommended.
District: Bermuda
Preparer: ~~ -z_J. ~.,...,,-~ Title:
John W. Harmon
Attachments:
Yes ~ No
Riqht of Way Manaqer
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Page 2 of 2
Meetino Date: Januarv 23. 2002 Number
Budget and ManaRement Comments:
Originally a site for this fire station (parcel 815653188800000) was
donated to the county as part of the Rivers Bend development. Staff
has been advised that locating the station at the original site is no
longer the preferred option; consequently, this alternative site
(parcel 8206510606400000) needs to be purchased.
The proffered conditions of zoning on the county's Rivers Bend site
(parcel 815653188800000) govern the development of this parcel. If the
site is not developed for a fire station/rescue squad facility, it may
be developed for other public uses or non public facilities as mutually
agreed upon by the developer and the county. Staff has been in contact
with the developer and is working to finalize terms of this agreement
that would permit the development of the property with non-public uses.
This item requests approval of the purchase of 4.022 acres of land for
Fire Station #17 (known as Rivers Bend Fire Station in the Capital
Improvement Program) for $400,000, plus $10,000 in closing costs. The
item also requests that the currently owned site (parcel
815653188800000) be declared surplus and offered for sale. Funding is
available in the project; contingency funds and land sale proceeds will
be used for this purpose as staff are exploring cost saving measures to
complete this station and the Reams Road station within the established
appropriations.
Preparer:
Rebecca T. Dickson
Title: Director, Budget & Management
0 0077
EXHIBIT "A"
A = 42'4,.7'I 6"
R = 646.20'
L = 481.82' J
INTERSTATE 295 RAMP
ON
CO~fPILED PLAT /
PARCEL 9' ~
SHOWING ; .. .,,.> .
CONTAININC 4.022 ACRES O-F LAND" ??
THE SOUTH LINE OF BERMUDA HUNDRED' ROAD
BERMUDA DISTRICT ~ CHESTERFIELD COUNTY, VIRGINIA
PREVIOUS JOB NO.
0 0078
ENGINEERS * ARCHITECTS '" SURVEYORS
PRINCE GEORGE OFag~
441~ C.oSSINOS aLVD.
--~ PRINCE GEORGE, VIRGINIA 25875-1455
TELEPHONE: (804) 458-8685 FAX: (804~
QAT~. 10-16-97 SCALE: 1~40'
DRAWN BZ' A~
CHECKED BE' ~ CALC. C~,:
JOB NO.: '
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Page I of ~
Meetin~l Date: January 23, 2002
Item Number: 8.D. 6.b.
Subiect: Approval of the Purchase of a Parcel of Land for Fire Station #20
County Administrator's Comments:
County Administrator~//~
Board Action Requested: Approve the purchase of a parcel of land containing 4.8
acres, more or less, for $100,000.00, from Cheryl G. Binford, for Fire
Station #20; authorize the County Administrator to execute the sales contract
and deed; initiate an application for Conditional Use to permit a fire
station on parcels 745701118800000 and 745702561200000; and, appoint Mike
Hatton, Battalion Chief, as the Board's agent.
Summary of Information:
Staff requests that the Board of Supervisors approve the purchase of an
additional parcel of land containing 4.8 acres, more or less, on Courthouse
Road, for $100,000.00, plus closing costs which are estimated to be
$5,000.00, from Cheryl G. Binford, for Fire Station #20; initiate an
application for Conditional Use to permit a fire station on parcels
745701118800000 and 745702561200000; and, appoint Mike Hatton, Battalion
Chief, as the Board's agent. The purchase is subject to obtaining the
necessary approvals to use the property as a fire station site and provides
for payment of a refundable $5,000.00 deposit.
Approval is recommended.
District: Clover Hill
Attachments: Yes ~ No
I I
Title:
Right of Way Manager
0 007~9
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Page 2 of 2
Meetino Date: January 23. 2002 Number
Budget and Mana.qement Comments:
This request is for approval of the purchase of 4.8 acres of land for
Fire Station #20 (known as Reams Road Fire Station in the Capital
Improvement Program) for $100,000, plus $5,000 in closing costs.
Funding is available in the project; contingency funds will be used for
this purpose as staff are exploring cost saving measures to complete
this station and the Rivers Bend station within the established
appropriations.
Preparer:
Rebecca T. Dickson
Title: Director, Budget & Manaqement
EXHIBIT "A"
======================================================================
:.:.:.:-:.:.:
Chesterfield County Department of Utilities
Right Of Way Office
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Page 1 of 3
Meeting Date: January 23, 2002
Item Number: 8.D. 7.
Sub.iect:
Amendment to the Board Minutes of December 19, 2001
County Administrator's Comments:
County Administrator:
Board Action Re(~uested:
Amend the minutes of December 19, 2001 as indicated below.
Summary_ of Information:
Prior to the vote for Item 8.C.2., State Road Acceptance, add the following:
"And, further, the Board adopted the following resolution:
WHEREAS, the streets described below are shown on plats recorded in the
Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Chesterfield County; and
WHEREAS, the Resident Engineer for the Virginia Department of
Transportation has advised this Board the streets meet the requirements
established by the Subdivision Street Requirements of the Virginia Department
of Transportation.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that this Board requests the Virginia
Department of Transportation to add the streets described below to the
secondary system of state highways, pursuant to ~ 33.1-229, Code of Virginia,
and the Department's Subdivision Street Requirements.
Lisa Elko
Title:Clerk to Board of Supervisors
Attachments:
---]Yes
No
0 O08Z
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Page 2 of 3
AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that this Board guarantees a clear and
unrestricted right-of-way, as described, and any necessary easements for
cuts, fills and drainage.
certified copy of this resolution be
for the Virginia Department of
AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that a
forwarded to the Resident Engineer
Transportation.
Tv=e Chang3e to the Secondary System of State Hi-hwavs: Addition
Basis for Change: Addition, New subdivision street
Statutory Reference: §33.1-229
Project: Whitley Manor, Sec. 2 ~ The Highlands
· Baniff Drive, State Route Number: 5288
From: Whitley Manor Dr., ( Rt. 5287)
To: Hadden Hall Dr., ( Rt. 5283), a distance of: 0.11 miles.
Right-of-way record was filed on 8/31/2000 with the Office Of Clerk To Circuit Court in Pb. 112; Pg.55,
with a width of 50 Ft.
· Hadden Hall Drive, State Route Number: 5283
From: .04 Mi. E of Hadden Hall Ct., ( Rt. 5284)
To: Baniff Dr., ( Rt. 5288), a distance of: 0.06 miles.
Right-of-way record was filed on 8/31/2000 with the Office Of Clerk To Circuit Court in Pb. 112; Pg.55,
with a width of 50 Ft.
· Hadden Hall Drive, State Route Number: 5283
From: Baniff Dr., ( Rt. 5288)
To: Cul-de-sac, a distance of: 0.21 miles.
Right-of-way record was filed on 8/31/2000 with the Office Of Clerk To Circuit Court in Pb, 112; Pg.55,
with a width of 50 Ft.
· Highland Glen Drive, State Route Number: 5160
From: .06 Mi. E. of Hadden Hall Dr., ( Rt. 5160)
To: Whitley Manor Dr., ( Rt. 5287), a distance of: 0.06 miles.
Right-of-way record was filed on 8/31/2000 with the Office Of Clerk To Circuit Court in Pb. 112; Pg.55,
with a width of 70 Ft.
0 0083
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Page 3 of 3
· Highland Glen Drive, State Route Number: 5160
From: Whitley Manor Dr., ( Rt. 5287)
To: .10 Mi. E of Whitley Manor Dr., ( Rt. 5287), a distance of: 0.10 miles.
Right-of-way record was filed on 8/31/2000 with the Office Of Clerk To Circuit Court in Pb. 112; Pg.55,
with a width of 70 Ft.
· Whitley Manor Drive, State Route Number: 5287
From: Highland Glen Dr., ( Rt. 5160)
To: Baniff Dr., ( Rt. 5288), a distance of: 0.13 miles.
Right-of-way record was filed on 813112000 with the Office Of Clerk To Circuit Court in Pb. 112; Pg.55,
with a width of 50 Ft.
· Whitley Manor Drive, State Route Number: 5287
From: Baniff Dr., ( Rt. 5288)
To: Cul-de-sac, a distance of: 0.04 miles.
Right-of-way record was flied on 8/31/2000 with the Office Of Clerk To Circuit Court in Pb. 112; Pg.55,
with a width of 50 Ft."
0 9084
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Page 1 of 1
Meetin~ Date: January 23, 2002
Item Number: 10.A.
Subject: Developer Water and Sewer Contracts
County Administrator's Comments:
County Administrator: ~
Board Action Requeste The Board of Supervisors has authorized the County
Administrator to execute water and/or sewer contracts between the County and
the Developer where there are no County funds involved.
The report is submitted to the Board members as information.
Summary of Information:
The following water and sewer contract was executed by the County
Administrator:
1. Contract Number:
Project Name:
01-0234
Amberleigh - Residential - Section 1
Developer:
Amberleigh LLC
Contractor:
Infracorps of Virginia Incorporated
Contract Amount:
Water Improvements -
Wastewater Improvements -
$26,965.00
$30,200.00
District:
Clover Hill
Preparer: Q-'~.~~¢~. ~.,~/" Title: Director
~ra~ ¢ B~ant
Attachments:
~Yes
No
#
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Page I of I
.Meeting Date: Janua~23, 2002 Item Number: 10.]~.
Sub_iect;
Status of General Fund Balance, Reserve for Future Capital Projects,
District Improvement Fund, and Lease Purchases
County_ Administrator's Comment~.
County Administrator:
Board Action Reauested:
Summary of Information:
Preparer:
.~/ L~'ng~B'. Ramsey
Attachments: Yes
Title:
County. Administrator
BOARD
MEETING
DATE
07/01/01
11/14/01
11/14/01
11/14/01
11/14/01
11/14/01
11/14/01
11/14/01
11/14/01
11/14/01 &
12/19/01'
11/14/01 &
12/19/01'
11/14/01 &
12/19/01'
11/14/01 &
12/19/01'
11/14/01 &
12/19/01'
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
GENERAL FUND BALANCE
January 23, 2002
DESCRIPTION
FY2002 Actual Beginning Fund Balance
Designation for Health Center Commission
Designate excess revenue (County) for non-
recurring items in FY2003
Designate excess expenditures (County) for non-
recurring items in FY2003
Designate excess revenue (Schools) for non-
recurring items in FY2003
FY01 Results of Operations - Schools unspent
General Fund Transfer
FY01 Results of Operations - FY02 One cent tax
rate decrease - Jan. - June (County)
FY01 Results of Operations - FY02 One cent tax
rate decrease - Jan. - June (Schools)
FY01 Results of Operations - Schools - Bailey
Bridge Middle School Design
FY01 Results of Operations - Fire
FY01 Results of Operations ~ Police
FY01 Results of Operations - Libraries
FY01 Results of Operations - Environmental
Management Program
FY01 Results of Operations - CSA Shortfall
AMOUNT
(1,500,000)
(2,636,670)
(9,441)
(6,088,836)
(1,232)
(242,285)
(546,715)
(250,000)
(626,100)
(500,000)
(90,600)
(300,000)
(286,635)
BALANCE
$48,351,214
$46,851,214
$44,214,544
$44,205,103
$38,116,267
$38,115,035
$37,872,750
$37,326,035
$37,076,035
$36,449,935
$35,949,935
$35,859,335
$35,559,335
$35,272,700
Board
Meeting
Date
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
RESERVE FOR FUTURE CAPITAL PROJECTS
TRADITIONALLY FUNDED BY DEBT
January 23, 2002
Description
FOR FISCAL YEAR 2001 BEGINNING JULY 1, 2000
4/12/00
FY01 Budgeted Addition
4/12/00
FY01 Capital Projects
3/06/01
Return unused funds; closure of Wide Area
Network Project
04/04/01
Transfer to Juvenile and Domestic Relations
Courthouse Project
04/25/01 Testing of Comprehensive Plan
Amount
8,400,000
(6,939,600)
561
(325,000)
(360,000)
Balance
8,812,051
1,872,451
1,873,012
1,548,012
1,188,012
FOR FISCAL YEAR 2002 BEGINNING JULY 1, 2001
4/4/01 FY02 Budgeted Addition
4/4/01 FY02 Capital Projects
7/25/01 County's Master Plan Update
9/26/01 Video equipment for Circuit and General
District Courts
10/24/01 360 West Corridor Plan
11/14/01 Building Improvements (County Administration)
11/14/01 Security Enhancements (MH/MR and County
Administration)
8,800,000
(7,579,700)
(85,0oo)
(9O,OOO)
(7o,oo0)
(170,000)
(107,000)
9,988,012
2,408,312
2,323,312
2,233,312
2,163,312
1,993,312
1,886,312
Prepared by
AccOunting Department
December 31, 2001
SCHEDULE OF CAPITALIZED LEASE PURCHASES
Date
Began
04199
06/99
1/01
03/01
04/01
11/00
09/01
APPROVED AND EXECUTED
Description
Public Facility Lease - Juvenile Courts Project
School Copier Lease #1 - Manchester High School
Certificates of Participation/
Building Construction, Expansion and Renovation;
Acquisition/Installation of Systems
Telephone System Upgrade
School Copier Lease #2 - Manchester High School
School Copier Lease #3 - Chester Middle School
School Server Lease
TOTAL APPROVED
AND EXECUTED
Original
.Amount
$16,100,000
43,587
13,725,000
1,222,411
20,268
20,268
278,372
$31,409,906
Date
Ends
11/19
05/04
11/21
03/05
03/06
09/05
07/05
Outstanding
Balance
12/31/01
$14,490,000
23,960
13,725,000
614,349
17,804
16,062
216,106
$29~103,281
PENDING EXECUTION
Description
None
Approved
Amount
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Page I of I
Meetin~l Date:
Januar~ 23,2002
Sub!ect:
Roads Accepted into the State
County_ Administrator's Comments:
Secondary
Item Number: iO.C.
System
County Administrator:
Board Action ReQuested:
Summary of Information:
Preparer:
Lisa H. Elko
Attachments:
Yes
-~No
Title:
Clerk to the Board
0t,94
CH ESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Page I of I
Meetin~l Date: January 23, 2002
Sub!ect:
Resolution Recognizing Bishop Gerald O.
Thirtieth Anniversary in Ministry
County Administrator's Comments:
Item Number:
Glenn Upon the Occasion of His
County Administrator:
Board Action Re~.ue~ted:
Adopt the attached resolution.
Summary of Information:
Mr. Warren has requested that the Board adopt this resolution to be presented
to Bishop Gerald O. Glenn at an upcoming ceremony recognizing him for 30
years of ministry.
Preparer: '-~ff,~'~' Title:
M. D. "Pete" 8tith
Attachments:
Yes ~ No
Deputy County Administrator
RECOGNIZING BISHOP GERALD O. GLENN UPON THE OCCASION
OF HIS THIRTIETH ANNIVERSARY IN MINISTRY
WHEREAS, Bishop Gerald O. Glenn was licensed to preach ministry on January 17,
1972 at Saints Home Church of God in Christ in Buffalo, New York; and
WHEREAS, Bishop Glenn was ordained an Elder in August 1977; and
WHEREAS, Bishop Glenn served as Assistant Pastor at the Prayer Room Church of God
in Christ in Batavia, New York; and
WHEREAS, Bishop Glenn studied theology at Houghton Bible College and Daemen
University; and
WHEREAS, Bishop Glenn served in ministry in Portsmouth, Virginia; Dallas, Texas;
Temple, Texas; and Richmond, Virginia; and
WHEREAS, in 1989, Bishop Glenn became Pastor of the First Union Baptist Church
at Warwick Road and Midlothian Turnpike; and
WHEREAS, in 1995, Bishop Glenn became Pastor of the New Deliverance Evangelistic
Church; and
WHEREAS, in 1998, the New Deliverance Evangelistic Church located in a beautiful
new church on Turner Road in Chesterfield County; and
WHEREAS, Bishop Glenn is a charter member of the Richmond Interfaith Sponsoring
Committee; the New Deliverance Fellowship Conference; and the Coalition to Ensure
Racial Diversity; and
WHEREAS, Bishop Glenn was named a Bishop on April 29, 2000; and
WHEREAS, Bishop Glenn also has an active ministry on local radio and television
stations; and
WHEREAS, Bishop Glenn was asked by Governor Mark Warner to deliver the prayer
during the Gubernatorial Inauguration; and
WHEREAS, Bishop Glenn played an important role in the highly successful
Chesterfield County Confederate Proclamation dialogues, which earned a Virginia
Municipal League President's Award as an outstanding program to increase understanding
among various parties; and
WHEREAS, Bishop Glenn has served as a Chesterfield County Police Chaplain.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors
recognizes the extraordinary leadership of Bishop Gerald O. Glenn, expresses its
appreciation for his years of service and ministry to Chesterfield County citizens, and
wishes him continued success in ministry.
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Page 1 of 1
Mcetin~l Date:
January 23, 2002
Item Number:
16.
Subject:
Public Hearing to Consider Readoption of an Ordinance Extending
the Period for Leaf Burning
County Administrator's Comments:
County Administrator: ~
Board Action Requested:
Readopt the attached ordinance
Summary of Information'
The County Code permits residents of the County to burn leaves
on property where they reside only from March 15 to April 15 from
4:00 p.m. to midnight Monday through Thursday and November 15 to
December 15 from 8:00 a.m. on Monday to noon on Friday. Due to
last fall's drought, Governor Gilmore imposed a leaf burning ban
that precluded County residents from burning leaves during much of
the November 15 to December 15 leaf burning period. As a result,
many citizens were unable to take advantage of the fall leaf
burning period. Accordingly, the Board extended the fall leaf
burning period this year until January 15, 2002, to allow residents
additional time to burn leaves, by adopting the attached ordinance
without a public hearing on an emergency basis on December 19,
2001. In order to validate the ordinance, state law requires that
the ordinance now be readopted after a public hearing.
Preparer: -t.~ ~L. ~ Title: Deputy Chief, Fire Department
Frank H. Edwards (55914. k55693.])
Attachments:
Yes ~ No
AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE CODE OF THE
COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD, 1997, AS AMENDED BY
AMENDING AND RE-ENACTING SECTION 11-41 RELATING
TO BURNING OF LEAVES
BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County:
That Section 11-41 of the Code of the County of Chester_field, 1997, as amended, is
amended and re-enacted to read as follows:
Sec. 11-41. Leaf burning dates and times.
(a) No person in the county may burn leaves from trees on property where they reside,
except: from March 15 to April 15 from 4:00 p.m. to midnight Monday through Thursday and from
November 15 to December 15 from 8:00 a.m. on Monday to noon on Friday; provided, however,
that leaf burning shall be permitted from December 19, 2001 through January_ 18, 2002.
ooo
(2) That this ordinance shall become effective immediately upon adoption.
0505:55693.1
Adopted 12/19/01
0 OvD','
An Affiliate of Media General
Advertisi ng Affidavit
(This is not a bill. Please pay from invoice)
P. O, Box 85333
Richmond, Virginia 23293-0001
(804) 649-6000
~ate
Code Description Ad Size
Account Num. ]
220806
01/1612002
~1 t 1 fi/2~02 121
TAKE, NOTICFF`TAKF, NOTICE, THAT THF BOARD O 2.00 x 23_00
Media General Operations, Inc.
ATTACH
Publisher of
THE RICHMOND TIMES-DISPATCH
This is to certify that the attached TAKF, NOT[CF`TAKE NOTICt~
Was published by Richmond Newspapers, inc, in the City of Richmond,
State of Virginia, on the follOWing dates:
01/09/2002 01/16'2002
The first insertion being given .... 01t09t2oo2
Sworn to and subscribed before
_ __
me this ~, ~
State of Virginia
City of Richmond
My Commission expires
.................. IS NOT A PLE AY F~'~! INVOICE. THANi~ ...... YOU
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Page I of I
Meetin~l Date: January/23, 2002 Item Number: 18.
Sub!ect:
Adjournment and Notice of Next Scheduled Meeting of the Board
of Supervisors
County_ Administrator's Comments:
County Administrator:
Board Action Requested:
Summary of Information:
Motion of adjournment and notice of next scheduled meeting to be held on
February 13, 2002 at 3:30 p.m.
Preparer: _~, fDc~ ~C~
Lisa H. Elko
Attachments:
---]Yes
Title:
No
Clerk to the Board
0 90L8