Loading...
08-24-77 PacketPublisher THE RICHMOND NEWS LEADEI AUG 1 0 t977 This fa to certlfv that the attached .............................. ~. was published in The Richmond News Leader. a newspaper pub- lished in the City of Richmond. State of Virginia, AUG The first insertion being AUG 1 0 1977 Notary Pu blic State of Virgmm, City of Rich mond: Mycomm~smon ×p~re 22/26/80 CO, NELL ~A~ fIN S~J~EmV~]~ TIITLE Pubiishe~ THE RICHMOND NEWS LEADER ~k NOT~CE was published in The Richmond News Leader. a newspaper lished ~n the C~ty of Richmond. Sta~e of V[rg~nia~ AUG 1 0 1977 The first .... insertion being g~ven .............................................. DEPARTMENT OJ TATION 23219 August 15, 197'7 County Gentlemen: approved LENGTH west Sincerely, 0~36 Mi. Deputy Commissioner Copies: Mr, E~ L, Chesterfield JOH~I~I~ HARWOOD, COMMISSIONER LEONARD R. HALL, BRISTOL, BRISTOL DISTRICT HORACE G. FRALIN, ROANOKE, SALEM DISTRICT THOMAS R. GLASS, LYNCHBURG, LYNCHBURG DISTRICT MORRILL M. CROWE, RICHMOND, R[CH)/~OND DI,~TR[CT WILL{AM T. ROOS, YORKTOWN, SUFFO£K DI,~TR1CT DOUGLAS G. JANNEY, FREDERICKSBURG, FREDF, RICK,C;BURG DLqTRICT RALPH A. BEETON, FALLS CHURCH, CULPEPER DISTRICT ROBERT S. LANDES, STAUNTON. ,gT,4UNTON DLYTR[CT T. RAY HASSELL, III, CHESAPEAKE,ATL,4RGZ~,-URB/zN CHARLES S. HOOPER,JR.,CREWE,ATLARGE.RURA£ COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS & TRANSPORTATION 1221 EAST BROAD STREET RICHMOND, 23219 August 15, 1977 W. S. G. BRITTON DEPUTY COMMISSIONER & CHIEF ENGINEER LEO E. BUSSER DIRECTOR OF ADMINISTRATION J. M. WRAY, JR. DIRECTOR OF OPERATIONS J. P. ROYER, JR. DIRECTOR OF PLANNING P. B. COLDIRON DIRECTOR OF ENGINEERING H. R. PERKINSON, JR. DIRECTOR OF PROGRAM MANAGEMENT IN REPLY PLEASE REFER TO Secondary System Addition Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County Chesterfield Court House, Virginia 23832 Gentlemen: As requested in resolution by your Board on May 11, 1977, the following addition to the Secondary System of Chesterfield County ~ hereby approved, effective July 1, 1977. AD~.~Z0N ~~P~TION TRACE SUBDIVIS ION Plantation Trace Drive - From: Beginning at Route 659 (Riverway Road) thence west and southwest 0.36 mile~o a cul-de-sac. LENGTH 0.36 Mi. Sincerely, Wo S. G. Britton, Deputy Commissioner and Chief Engineer Copies: Mr. W. P. Tucker Mr. J. P. Mills, Jr. Mr. A. S. Brown Mr. L. E. Brett, Jr. Mr. L. H. Dawson, Jr. Mr. E. L. Covington, Jr. - Chesterfield TRANSPORTATION -- AMERICA'S LIFELINES I I I I ! 1 0 > {3¢ ~.' C 0 ~ CHESTERfiELD CO-U BOARD Of SUPfbVISObS MEETING DATE: August 24, 1977 NTY AGENDA ITEM NUMBER: 3, A, B. C, D&E SUBJECT: - C~Y~JNITY DEVELO~ A. Set Date for Public Hearing on Ordinance Relating to Definition of Stock Farm B. Contract for Sale of 1,0+ acre of l~nd at Airport Industrial Park C. State Road Acceptance Do Save-Harmless Agreement for Clarendon, Section B COUNTYADMINISTRATOR~RECOMMENDATIONORCOMMENTS:- A. September 14, 1977 at 10:00 a.m. is recommended. B. Approval is recommended. C. Approval is recommended. D. Approval is recommended. D=pL=,,b=~ 14, 1;77 an IO:15 a.m. is SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: - ATTACHMENTS:- r':'~ YES r"~ No AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND AND REENACT SECTIONS 15-1 AND 15-4 OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CODE OF THE COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD, 1975, AS AMENDED, RELATING TO STOCK FARMS IN AGRICULTURAL ZONES BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County: (!) That Sections 15-1 and 15-4 o'f the Zoning Ordinance of the Code of the County of Chesterfield are amended and reen- acted as follows: Section 15-1 (a) (b) (c) (d) Ce) (f) U~es permitted. Same as specified for R-40 District. Farming, dairy farming, livestock and poultry raising, including all buildings necessary to such use and the keeping, storage or operation of any vehicle or machin- ery necessary to such Use. Forestry operations and sawmills together with the incidental uses thereof. Graveyards.. Stock Farms"---provided that the' lot' or' parcel has not 'les's th'an~ 'th'ree' ' (~3)' 'acres. Kennels, provided that not more than six (6) dogs are kept and confined to the premises and the lot or parcel has not less than five (5) acres. Section 15-4 Uses allowed by Special Exception, subject to the provisions of Section 27-5. (a) Same as specified for R-40 District. (b) Individual mobile homes for a period not to exceed two years. At the expiration of the two year period a new application may be made for a new Special Exception. The Board of Zoning Appeals may take action on such application without prior notice being published in a newspaper on the date the Board will act on such appli- cation and no notice to adjoining landowners shall be required unless directed by the Board of Zoning Appeals. (c) Outdoor advertising signs subject to Section 24.2-5. (d) StoCk fa'rmS when' *the lot or parcel has l'ess than three '(3)~ acres. 3. REAL ESTATE SALES CONTRACT THIS CONTRACT OF SALE, made this 16th day of August, 1977, by and between R. W. Ad~ms Enterprises, Incorporated, hereinafter called Purchaser, and the County of Chesterfield, hereinafter called Seller, provides as follows: Purchaser agrees to buy and Seller agrees to sell all that ceztain piece, parcel, or lot of real estate, and all improvements and appurtenances thereto belonging, described as follows: 100' road frontage adjoining 7710kquitepine Road and extending in a Southeasterly direction towards Route l0 along Whitepine Road, and extending approximately 525' deep to parallel the existing property line of 771~0 White- pine Road. This lO0' x 525' parcel to be divided from the original Parcel 2 (County Map 79, Deed Book 983, Page 433) located in the Chesterfield Airport Industrial Park, Chesterfield County, Virginia. The purchase price of the property is Twenty Thousand and No/100 Dollars per acre. A deposit of One Hundred and No/100 Dollars ($100.00) is herewith made by the Purchaser, which deposit is to be applied to the purchase price; or refunded if Title is not marketable or any contingency hereof is not fulfilled. Seller agrees to provide Title, free and clear of all encumbrances, tenancies, liens (for taxes or otherwise), except as may be otherwise pro- vided herein, but subject to such ordinary and marketable restrictive covenants and utility and drainage easements as may apply. Seller further agrees to deliver possession of the property to Purchaser on the date of settlement and to pay the expense of preparing the deed of bargain and sale and the Grantor's recording tax. This contract is subject to the following conditions being fulfilled: 1. Purchaser obtaining Conditional Use Permit as applied for on August 5, 1977, by October 26, 1977, or as soon thereafter as possible. £. Purchaser finalizing Lease Agreement with U. S. Army Corps of Engineers by October 22, 1977. The parties hereto acknowledge that' neither has relied upon any oral representation or agreement by the other, and no such oral representation or agreement shall affect in any way the terms of this written agreement. This contract shall be void and the Purchaser shall be under no obligations with respect thereto if same is not accepted by the Seller by August 31, 1977, in which event the Purchaser shall be entitled to a full refund of deposit made herewith. WITNESS the following signatures and seals: (OR SELT,ERS AGENT): PURCHASER (OR PURGHASERS AGENT): -ic e_Presidefft/Treasu~r- (smz) COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD Intracounty Correspondence 3, C, D &E. TO: FROM: SUBJECT: Mike Ri tz R. cElfish Board Agenda DATE: August 17, 1977 (1) State Road Acceptance: A. B. C. D. (2) Save Harmless Agreement: Deerpark Drive - Clover Hill, Section F (Clover Hill District) Archwood Subdivision (Clover Hill District) Brandermill - Litchfield Bluff (Clover Hill District) Clarendon, Section B (Clover Hill District) (3) Set public hearing date for ordinance for changing of ordinance relating to erosion and sedimentation control. ! ! TO: FROM: SUBJECT: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING ROADS TO BE TAKEN INTO THE STATE SECONDARY SYSTEM ITEM NO. Archwood & Shenandoah A & B Kai~htsbrid~e Road - Beginning at its intersection with North Arch Road (State Route 672) westerly .07 mile to its inter- section with Chessington Road thence .06 mile to State maintenance. Earls~ate Road - Beginning at its intersection with Chessington Road northwesterly .06 mile to State maintenance. Chessin~ton Road - Beginning at its intersection with Redbridge Road (State Route 2510) northerly .24 mile to its inter- section with Earlsgate Road thence northerly .16 mile to its intersection with Knightsbridge Road. TO: FROM: SUBJECT: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING ROADS TO BE TAKEN INTO TME STATE SECONDARY SYSTEM ITEM NO. Litchfield Bluff Subdivision in Brandermill (Clover Hill District) Woodbriar Court - Beginning at its intersection with Millridge Parkway, State Route 1920, thence southwesterly 0.06 mile to a cul-de-sac. Woodbriar Ridse - Beginning at its intersection with Woodbriar Court thence westerly 0.06 mile to a cul-de-sac. BOARD OF SUFE~VISORS KHVI~OHHEHTAL EH~IHEERI~ ROADS TO BE TA~EH IHTO THE STATE SECOHDA~! SYSTEH Sreenfield, Sections A & I Eoc,kl, edge Road - Yr~m 1ts interoection wi~Ja Woodmont Road (State Route 198~) westerly .12 mile to a dead end. OranZevood Road - Bal~nnin~ at its intersection with Rockledse Road .1 nile to ice :f. nteFaect:Lo~ u~th Beechdale Road. Deauville Road - Besinn:h~ aC ica intersection v~h Rockledse Road northerly .12 uile to Sr. aCe m~intenance. BOARD OF SUPERVISORS HOADS TO RE TAKEN Ilft~O ~ STATE SECOHDAR! SYSTEH ITEH HO. Greenfield~ Sections A & ! (Continued) ~eechdale Ro~d - BeiinninE at its ~utersectio~ ~rlth ~~le easterly ~14 ~le to State ~ute 1985. MEETING DATE: CHEST ERflEID COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS August 24, 1977 AGENDA ITEM NUMBER: 4 SUBJECT:- DISCUSSION OF SEWER CONNECTION FEE FOR THE SCHOOL ON KRAUSE ROAD COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S RECOMMENDATION OR COMMENTS: - See attached memorandum. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: - ATTACHMENTS:- r~YES r~NO MEETING DATE: CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD Of SUPERVISORS August 24, 1977 AGENDA ITEM NUMBER: 5 SUBJECT:- REQUEST FOR APPROPRIATION OF $29,300 FOR THE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S RECOMMENDATION OR COMMENTS: - Mr. Newman Hamblet, representing the Richmond Chamber of Commerce~ discussed this matter with you on August 15th. The proposal is to form an organization representing Chesterfield, Henrico and Hanover Counties and the City of Richmond with a first year budget of approximately $100,000. A Board of Directors representing the participating jurisdictions would direct the activities of the organization. Approval of the request is recommended. SUMMARYOFINFORMATION:- ATTACHMENTS:- DYES MEETING DATE:, CHEST ERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS August 24, 1977 AGENDA ITEM NUMBER: 9, A, P~ C & D SUBJECT: - P~RSONNEL MATII!RS A, Retire~nent Resolution for Mr. A. L, Greenwood B. Personnel and Salary Review Comnittee Rec~,,,Lendations C. Request of the Police Chief for Additiorml Personnel D. Set Date for Public Hearing on Ordinance Relating to the Establishmemt of a Department of Personnel, etc. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S RECOMMENDATION OR COMMENTS: - A. Recoranend Approval. B. Reconmend Approval. / C. No Recommendation. This is a reconsideration of submitted budget request, D. September 14, 1977, at 10:30 a.m, is recommended.. a previously SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: - ATTACHMENTS:- ~YES r-]NO coo~¥ ~,N ~T~^~__~'S 9. A, It is on motion of the Board resolved that the' following resolution be and it hereby is adopted: WHEREAS, Alton Leon Greenwood will retire from the Chesterfield County Utilities Department on August 31, 1971~ after serving the Department and the County since August 5, 19~~ as a waterworks operator, and WHEREAS, Mr. Greenwood has rendered a valuable service to the people of Chesterfield County and has given unstintingly of his time, efforts and abilities,~including many hours without pay, and WHEREAS, It has been to the credit of the County and its citizens to have Mr. Greenwood as an employee of the Chesterfield County Utilities Department at both the Falling Creek and Swift Creek Water PIants, and WHEREAS, It is the desire of this Board to recognize his faith- ful service to the County and to spread this recognition upon the Minute Book of the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County; therefore · RESOLVED, That this Board publicly recognizes the demanding and diligent service of Mr. A. L. Greenwood and this Board extends on behalf of its members and the people of Chesterfield County their appreciation and gratitude to Mr. Greenwood for his many years of distinguished service to the County and hopes that his retirement shall be long and~ewarding; therefore BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, That a copy of this resolution be presented to Mr. Greenwood and that this resolution be permanently recorded among the papers of the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County, Virginia. August 17, 1977 id TO' FROM' SUBJECT: COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD (For Intracounty Correspondence) Mr. Robert B. Galusha Robert A. Painter ~¢.~z Retirement Resolution DATE:August 17, 1977 In accordance with your request, we are transmitting herewith a sample resolution for the Board of Supervisors concerning the retirement of A. L. Greenwood. RAP:id Enclosure MEMORANDUM: August 16, 1977 To: From: Subject: Mr. N. Meiszer, County Administrator Mr. R. B. Galusha, Personnel Direct~ Recommendations by the Personnel and Salary Advisory Committee, August 12, 1977. The format inclosed is the usual way recommendations by the Committee are presented to the Board for necessary action. The Board generally votes upon the recommendations of the Committee as a whole rather than upon each recommendation unless, of cours~there is disagreement on one or another of the recommendations. When a transaction of funds is involved, the Budget Director reviews the recommendations of the Committee and provides the necessary resolution for Board adoption. In this case we have two actions involved: 1. Approval or denial of the recommendations of the Personnel and Salary Advisory Committee, and if approved; e The adoption of ~he resolution as prepared by the Bu.dget Director to transact the n~er, essary fundi'ng for the request. Lane Ramsey's resolution and recommended transaction is at Inclosure 2. Inclosures - 2 MINUTES PERSONNEL AND SALARY ADVISORY COMMITTEE Personnel and Salary Advisory Committee meeting l:O0 P.M. August 12, 1977 MEMBERS PRESENT: MEMBERS ABSENT: Mrs. J. C. Girone Mr. N. Meiszer Mr. R. Galusha Mr. G. Dodd AGENDA ITEM #l' Miss L. Corr, Director of Social Services, requested the Committee's consider- ation and support to reclassify the existing positions, Director, Grade 30 and Assistant DirectOr, Grade 26 to Grades 31 and 27 respectively. DISCUSSION: Mr. J. R. Apperson, Cha~nanof the Board of Social Services spoke in behalf of Miss Corr's request, indicating that both recommendations had been before the Social Services Board, and had the Board"s enthusiastic support. Speaking for the Board, Mr. Apperson was of the opinion that the additional Federal and State mandated programs had expanded the responsibilities of the two positions significantly to warrant this requested reclassification action. COMMITTEE ACTION: The Committee recommended that the Board of Supervisors approve the reclassifi- cations of the Director and Assistant Director positions from Grades 30 and 26 to 31 and 27 respectively. These actions, if approved, will be effective on the anniversary dates of the incumbents and will' be accomplished with present budget constraints. AGENDA ITEM #2: Chief Eanes, Fire ~epartment, requested the Committee's consideration and support to establish a new position, Clerk Typist II~, within the Fire Department, and that $5,200 be appropri~atedto cover the salary requirement from September 1, 1977 through 1977-78 budget year. DISCUSSION: Chief Eanes justifi'ed the position on the basis of additional work load created by the addition of two paid fire Sub stations and the administrative requirements related thereto. Additionally, necessary administrative responsilbilities have been neglected due to the lack of clerical assistance within the department. COMMITTEE ACTION: The COmmittee's concensus was that the position was necessary and recommended that the Board of Supervisors approve the establishment of one additional Clerk Typist II position within the Fire Department. Additionally~ Mr. Meiszer asked that this action be referred to the Budget Officer for his review and recommendation pertinent to transactiDn of funds. Mr. R. B. Gal usha Recorder/Secretary Mrs. Joan Gi'rone Cha i rman COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD INTRACOUNTY CORRESPONDENCE August 16, 1977 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: Bob Galusha Lane B. Ramsey~ Personnel Action - Personnel and Salary Advisory Cormmittee; August 12, 1977 Per your request I have examined the Fire Department budget for the possible surplus of funds to use for a new Clerk Typist II position. I believe there will be a sufficient surplus there to fund that position due to the delay in filling new positions. Suggested Resolution: On motion of ~ .,.~. , seconded by , it is hereby resolved that $5,200 be transferred from Planned Budget Expense account 111-07120-1060 Compensation of Firemen to Planned Budget Expense account 111-07120-1091 Compensation of Clerical Staff. LBR/lga MEMORANDUM: August 15, 1977 To: From: Subject: Mr. L. Ramsey, Budget Director Mr. R. Galusha, P~rsonnel Dir,~ Personnel Action - Personnel & Salary Advisory Committee; August 12, 1977 At the August 12, 1977 meeting of the Personnel & Salary Advisory Committee, the Committee recommended the approval of a request from Chief Eanes, Fire Department, for the establishment of a new position within his department -- Clerk Typist II. His request included a requirement to provide additional funds of $5,200 to cover the salary from September 1, 1977 through the end of the 1977-78 budget year. Please review this request and provide me an appropriate resolution for Board action. As I will need to finalize my minutes for the Board agenda by Thursday, August 18, 1977, I would appreciate it if you could provide me an appropriate transaction and/or recommendation as appropriate by August 17, 1977. Thank you. 9, D~ AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE CODE OF THE COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD, 1975, AS AMENDED, BY ADDING SECTIONS 16-3 THROUGH 16-11 RELATING TO THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A DEPARTMENT OF PERSONNEL, ESTABLISHMENT OF A PERSONNEL APPEALS BOARD, AND PROMULGATION OF PERSONNEL REGULATIONS BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield Co un ty: (1) That the Code of the County of Chesterfield, 1975, as amended, is amended by adding ~§16-3 through 16-11 as follows: Sec. 16-3. Personnel department - Created; composition. There is hereby created a department of personnel which shall consist of a director of personnel, a personnel appeals board and such employees as may be authorized from time to time. Sec. 16-4. Same - Director of personnel. The director of personnel shall be appointed by the Board of Supervisors upon the recommendation of the County Adminis- trator He shall be chosen on the basis of his general execu- tive and administrative ability and experience, with due regard for his education, training and experience in personnel manage- ment. The director shall appoint the employees of the depart- ment, and shall have general management and control over them. He shall be '~--~sponsible for the formulation and administration of the personne~ policies of the County. In addition, the direc- tor of personnel shall have the authority to interpret and apply ~ the personnel regulations to insure fairness and equity, shall advise the County Administrator on matters concerning personnel administration Within the County, maintain all personnel records and files relating to County employees, and perform such other appropriate duties as the County Administrator may direct. He shall serve ex officio as the secretary of the personnel appeals board, but shall have no vote thereon. Sec. 16-5. Same -. Personnel appeals board - Appointment; terms of office; vacancies; quorum; officers. There is hereby created a personnel appeals board which shall consist of three persons who are not employees of the County who shall be appointed by the Board of Supervisors. Of those first appointed one shall be appointed to serve for one year, one for two years, and one for three years. Thereafter, members shall be appointed for the full term of three years. Vacancies shall be filled by the Board of Supervisors by appoint- ment for the unexpired portion of the term. The personnel appeals board shall annually choose one of its members to act as, chairman. Two members of the board shall constitute a quorum. The members of the board shall serve without compensation. No member of the board shall serve more than two consecutive full ~ terms; provided, that members initially appointed to lesser terms or appointed to fill unexpired terms may thereafter serve two full terms Sec. 16-6. Same - Same - Powers and duties; appeals by employees. (a) The personnel appeals board shall constitute the final authority to rule upon grievances filed by employees under the ' grievance procedure promulgated pursuant to section 16-11. (b) In addition any County employee with.the exception of the County Administrator, Assistant County Administrator, County Attorney and Department Directors/Chiefs, shall have an appeal of right to the board from any a~nistrative action suspending such employee for more than ~~'consecutive work days, demo- tions, changing the classification of such employee adversely, or dismissing such employee, which types of personnel actions are not considered to be subject to the aforementioned grievance procedures. Such appeals shall be made within ten calendar days after the exhaustion of all administrative remedies available to such employee. (c) Within ten working days of receipt of nOtice of such an appeal the personnel appeals board shall convene a hearing which may be in public or in executive session at the option of the appellant and at which the appellant may be represented by legal counsel or by some other person of his own choosing. The County may be represented by counsel or by the head of the department in which the appellant employee is employed. As soon as practicable after such hearing the personnel appeals board shall report in writing its findings and recommendations to the County Admlnlotr~to.., which findings and recommendations are to be merely advisory and in no way mandatory or binding upon the Board of Supervisors who shall have the responsibility for making the final decision. Sec. 16-7. Employee classification plan. A class~ification plan for service shall be recommended by the director'~f ~ersonnel to the County Administrator. It shall set forth titles, duties and specifications for the various kinds of work performed by employees of the County. Changes in the classification plan may be recommended from time to time by the director of personnel and shall take effect when approved by the County Administrator. The class titles set forth in the classi- fication plan shall be used to designate such positions in all official records, documents, vouchers and communications, and no person shall be appointed to or employed in a position within the County service under any class title which has not been recommended by the director of personnel and approved by the County Administrator as appropriate to the duties to be performed. Sec. 16-8. Employee uniform pay plan - Generally. There shall be a uniform pay plan consisting of a salary range for each class of positions in the classification plan, which shall provide for increments within such range to be earned by length of service and satisfactory performance. Each class of positions shall be allocated to a salary range with due regard to the salary ranges for other classes and to the relative difficulty and responsibility of characteristic duties of positions in the class, the desirable qualifications, the prevailing rates paid within the effective recruiting area, and any other factors that have a bearin9' on the adequacy and fair- ness of the range. The pay plan shall be submitted to the Board] of Supervisors by the County Administrator for review and appro-. val. Sec. 16-9. Same - Changes. The director of personnel shall constantly review the pay ranges of classifications within the pay plan and when necessary make recommendations for changes to the County Administrator. The ranges of pay for each class of positions may be changed by the Board of Supervisors upon such recommendation of the County Administrator, provided appropriated funds are available for any increases 'in the ranges. Sec. 16-10. Interpretation. The director of personnel shall be responsible for inter- preting and applying the employees classification plan for ser- vice and the uniform pay plan to personnel questions or problems which are not specifically addressed by the employee classifica- tion plan for service and the uniform pay plan. Sec. 16-11. Administrative personnel regulations. The director of personnel shall prepare and recommend to the County Administrator a grievance procedure and such other administrative regulations as he may consider necessary to carry out the provisions of this ordinance and to provide systematic and equitable handling of the personnel affairs of the County. The director of personnel shall submit any amendments or revi- sions thereto as he shall deem necessary to the County Adminis- trator for final approval or disapproval. Upon approval by the County Administrator such regulations or amendments shall be in force unless rescinded by the Board of Supervisors. After any such personnel regulations are adopted or amended, the Director of Personnel shall take any appropriate actions which are reason- ably calculated to inform all County employees of the provisions of the regulations. MEETING DATE: CHESTE August 24, 1977 RflELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA ITEM NUMBER: 13 SUBJECT:- MISCELLANEOUS MATTERS A. Set Date for Reynolds Aluminum Tour of Plants / ~ Invoice for Appraisal of Old Data Processing Facility ///~. Rescind Motion Appointing Mrs. Girone to SPECTRAN and [,/ / Make Motion to Appoint Mr. Dexter Williams ./ m/. Appointments to the Appomattox Scenic River Committee COUNTY ADMINI~RATOR'S RECOMMENDATION OR COMMENTS: - A. Board members will have to check their calendars. B. Recommend approval. C. Recommend approval. D. Recommend approval of the following people as suggested bv Mr. O'Neill: Dr. Joseph C. Hillier Mr. Warren Purcell Mr. Howard Clayton SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: - ATTACHMENTS:- E]YES r-lNO CHESTE MEETING DATE: August 24, 1977 RFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA ITEM NUMBER: 11 SUBJECT:- ERRONEOUS TAX CLAIMS COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S RECOMMENDATION OR COMMENTS: - Re c on-,~-~en d Approval. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: - There are nine erroneous tax claims for refunds amounting to $178.32. ATTACHMENTS:- r~YEs ~]NO WATSON AND BARTON. il%C. I~EAL ESTATE APPF;~AISEI~S ~: CONSULTANTS 8t5-7OO EAST MAIN STREET RICHMOND, VIRGINIA 23219 13, M. HOWELL WATSON. ~4. A. I.. S. I~. I". A. ROBERT E. BARTON ~. A. I.. S. R. ~'. A. June 28, 1977 TELEPHONE 648-284g Mr. Jack Manuel Acting County Administrator Chesterfield County P. O. Box 40 Chesterfield, Virginia 23832 For Appraisal of Office Building in Courthouse Complex, Chesterfield County, Virginia .......... $300.00x/~/ INVOIC£S CHECF, ED FOR THE FOLLOWING MATCH INVOICE TO P.O.I EXTENSIONS ~~ FILED BY "SERVICE IN VALUATION'~-~ CHESTERFIELD ~o~,t~ ~, ~.~O~o!?!!o. ,~. CFAIR GROUNDS AT CHESTERFIELD COURT HOUSE) Chesterfield, Va. 23832 August 19, 1977 Mr. Nicholas ~iszer County Administrator County of Chesterfield Chesterfield, Virginia 23832 Dear Mr. Meiszer: This letter is to request a renewal of our Bingo Permit for The Chesterfield County Fair Association, Inc. for period August 23, 1977 through August 22, 1978. Enclosed is a check for $10.00 to cover this renewal. /mc Sincerely, J.A. Baicy Fair Manager MEETING DATE: CHESTERFIELD COU BOARD Of SUPfbVI$OR$ August 24, 1977 NTY AGENDA ITEM NUMBER:, 6. A, B, & C SUBJECT: - PUBLIC HEARINGS A. Ordinance Relating to Signing of Subdivision Plats by the County Administrator B. Ordinance Relating to the Requirement for a Second Public Road Access C. Ordinance Relating to the Designation of Assistant Director of Central Accounting COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S RECOMMENDATION OR COMMENTS: - Approval of the three ordinances is recommended° SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: - This date was set for a public hearing on the attached ordinances. ATTACHMENTS:- ~"'] YES r']NO - (7 couNTY 6. A. AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND AND REENACT ARTICLE VII, STAGE C OF THE SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE OF THE CODE OF THE COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD, 1975, AS AMENDED, RELATING TO SIGNING OF SUBDIVISION PLATS BY THE EXECUTIVE SECRETARY BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County: (1) That Article VII, Stage C of the Subdivision Ordinance of the Code of the County of Chesterfield, 1975, as amended, is amended and reenacted as follows: STAGE C. Recorded Plat Upon receipt of a certified copy of the approved final plat, and upon signature and seal by the secretary to the Planning Commission of the plat to be recorded, the SUBDIVIDER files one ~e~-p~ transparency (photographici positive polyester film) with the ~he~e~e~-e~M Chie~ BUilding ~m~e~'~-8~ee Official and one transparency (photographic positive polyester fil'm) with the Environmental Engineering Bepa~men~-~-~he.9~e~e~-~n~ Division. The approved final plat shall be recorded within twelve months of the date of tentative approval, and within ninety days of the date of approval by the See~e~a~-an~-~aN~-D~ee~ Secretary. After recorda- tion, the SUBDIVIDER proceeds to develop and sell the lots of his subdivision. AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND AND REENACT S~CTION 2-16 OF THE CODE OF THE COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD, 1975, AS AMENDED, RELATING TO THE DESIGNATION OF ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF CENTRAL ACCOUNTING BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County: (1) That Section 2-16 of the Code of the County of Chester- field, 1975, as amended, is amended and reenacted as follows: Sec. 2-16. Same--Designation of ~eP~Y~assistant director; bonds Of department members. The director of central accounting shall designate an_ assistant director who shall be an employee of the department of central accounting and wh° shall perform such duties as may be assigned to him from time to time by the director. The ~ep~ ~assistant director shall be covered by a bond as specified for the director. All other employees of central accounting shall be covered by bonds of not less than five thousand dollars conditioned upon faithful performance of duty and running in favor of the county. ERFIELD COUNTY BOARD Of SUPERVISORS CHEST MEETING DATE: August 24, 1977 SUBJECT: - AGENDA ITEM NUMBER: CONSIDER AMENDMENTS TO ORDINANCES RELATING TO DOGS 7 COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S RECOMMENDATION OR COMMENTS: - SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: - A Public Hearing was held on August 15th and there is a recommenda- tion from the Committee appointed to study this matter. The recommendation is enclosed. ATTACHMENTS:- ~]::YES r']NO OUNTY ADII~ N I~/~O R'S A[~ ORDINanCE TO A~,~:ND AND P~EENACT SECTIONS 1-4, 4-3, 4-4, 15-1.~AND 17-3 OF ~7{E CHESTER- FIELD COUI.~TY ZONI}~G ORDINANCE OF THF CODE OF THE COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD, 1975, AS AMENDED REI,AT!~ TO PERMISS!BLF, ~ONES FOR KEN~ELS BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of SuF~ervisors of Chesterfield Co unty: (1) 5~nat sections 1-4, 4-3, 4-4, 15-1 and 17-3 of the Zoning Ordinance of the Code of the County of Chesterfield are amended and reenacted as follows: Se ctiom ~ 1- 4 De fi n itions. (47) KE~{NEL: A place where three or more dogs e~-¢~s more than six m~nth-~--old are kept, either private or for pay or for sale. Section 4- 3 Uses allowed by Conditional Use subject to the provisions of Section 28-2. (a) Stock farms. (~b) Multiple-family dwellings. (~-_c) A dwelling unit separated from ~J%e principal dwelling unit. (ed) Pulalic and private profit making clubs, golf courses, and other recmeational facilities. (~e) Planned Developments. (~) }{ass Transportation. (h~) Two family dwellings. Section 4-4 Uses allowed by Special Exception, subject to t_he provisions of Section 27-5. Section 15-1 Uses permitted. (a) Same as specified for R-40 District. (b) Farming, dairy farming, livestock and poultry raising, including all buildin{3s necessary to such use and the keeping, storage or operation of any vehicle or machinery necessary to s~ch use. (c) Forestry operations and sawmills together with the ~.~.~%~.~al uses thereof. (d) Graveyards. (e) Stock Farms. (f) Kenne lsv-pmew~ea-ehae-mee-m~e-ehan-s~M-%6}-~qs-a~e Section 17-3 Uses allowed by Conditional Use, subject to the provisions of Section 28-2. (I) Any conditional use as allowed in the R-40 District, unless previously allowed in Section 17-1. (2) Jails, prisons, road camps. (3) Cor~mercial automobile parking. (4) Kennels. AT? ORDINA~'~CE TO ~-~END A?~D P.E~NACT SECTIONS 5-13 aND 5-.17 OF T}~E CODE OF THE COD~TY OF CHESTERFIELD, 19 75 , ~$ A~NDED, p~I2%TINC GENERALLY TO DOG LICENSES AND CONF!~rEMENT A~D DISPOSITION OF !)OGS BE IT O~DAI~:~ED by the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County: (1) That sections 5-13 and 5--17 of the Code of the County of Chesterfield are amended ~nd reenacted as follows: Sec. 5-13. Required; term; taxes. (a) It shall be unlawful for any person to own a dog six months old or over, unless such ~.~.og is licensed, as required by bhis section. (b) Dog licenses shall run b? the calendar year from January 1 to Decomber 31, inclusive, and t~he license tax shall be payable on or before February 1 of each license year at the office of the county treasurer and shall be as follows: (1) (2) For a male dog, eh~ee ~iv~ dollars. Unsexed ~ale or Female. For an unsexed male or (3) (4) (5) Female. For a female dog, ~.h~ee f_i~y:_e.= dollars. Kennel. For twenty dogs, fifteen dollars. Kennel. For fifty dogs, twenty-five dollars. (c) Funds collected in the enforcement of this section m~nn=~ as do~ license taxes shall be disposed of in the sam~ ,~ ~ ~ Sec. 5-17. Confinement and disposition of dogs; redemption by .......... ....... 0wn~.r ;:....pOund cha~ge~ ~ (a) The dog warden shall cause to be constructed and main- tained a pound or enclosure and. shall require dogs running at large contrary to the provisions of this article to be confined t~herein. Any do? which has been confined for a period of se~gn working days and has not been claimed by the owner thereof ~ ~b~""destr6Yed by the dog warden or otherwise disposed of in accordance with t.his section; provided, that dogs confined with tags shall not be destroyed until thee owner of such dog has been notified in writing by certified mail at least fifteen days prior to the destruction of the dog. Such notice reg~lrement shall be ~~ mm£f£cient when mailed to the owner's addres~ as on record in the county treasurer's office. (b) Any dog found in the county not vaccinated or not wearing an authentic vaccination taq or license tag as provi-ded · ~. ~ t~e warden, deputy dog in this chapter sh~ll be ~mpoun,~.~,'.~ by .~. ~og wardens or police officers. (c) Any dog confined under any of the provisions of this chapter may be redeemed by its owner at any time after confine- ment, if such dog has been otherwise disposed of under the pro- visions of this section, upon payment of the proper fees. No dog shall be released to any person claiming ownership until proof of current dog license receipt or tag and current valid vaccination certificate are presented~ and by payment to the dog warden of a fee in the amount of ~e-~e~-e3~-~T ten dollars if claimed during the first twenty-four hours of '~po ~h:{ and _.f...~.ve..~ dollars a day .for each additional day thereafter. (d) Any person purchasing a,,~/og f~gm, ~he..,~,ty dog.,po.u~d shall ay ~fee ~of'tan dollars~ SUch money t° De ~xsposed o~ in pound at any time after the confinement period for such dog or dogs expires by selling such dog or dogs to bona fide medical research laboratories. The purchaser of such dogs shall certify to the dog warden on forms furnished by the county dog warden that t~he animsls shall be used for medical research purposes only. MEETING DATE: CHESTERFIELD COUNTY bOARD Of SUPERVISORS August 24 ~ 1977 AGENDA ITEM NUMBER: SUBJECT:- 'Contract W77-76CD Country Place COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S RECOMMENDATION OR COMMENTS:- Recommend Approval SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: - TOTAL CONTRACT COST: EST. COUNTY COST: (through connections) EST. DEVELOPER COST: $29,112.50 $ 4,926.25 $24,186.25 ATTACHMENTS:- ~"] YES r']NO SIGNATU RE: COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S ~Y C h EST'E R f I E L D CO U N TY BOARD'OF SUPERVISORS MEETING DATE: Ausust 24, 1977 AGENDA ITEM NUMBER: 8 SUBJECT:- BID FOR BOOKMOBILE FOR THE COJNTY LIBRARY COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S RECOMMENDATION OR COMMENTS: - The bid of The Gerstenslager Company is recommended for approval. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: - See bid tabulation. ATTACHMENTS:- ~YES r'"lNo SIGNATURE: ' t co u"~ ~; A'b'~ p~ s~/R's BOARD OF SUPERVISORS E. MERLIN O'NEILL. CHAIRMAN MATOACA DISTRICT JOAN GIRONE. VICE CHAIRMAN MIDLOTHIAN DISTRICT C. L. BOOKMAN CLOVI'R HILL DISTRICT J. RUFF'IN APP£RSON DALE DISTRICT GARLAND O0DD SrRM~DA DISTRICT COUNTY ADMINISTRATION' C. G MANUEL 1'From COUNTY AONIINISTRATOR 804 -748-1211 OF CHESTERFIELD CHESTERFIELD, VIRGINIA 23832 TO: Mr. Nicholas M. Meiszer County Administrator FROM: H. Edward James Administrative Assistant Dept. of General Services SUBJECT: Bid Submitted for Approval DATE: August 11, 1977 Invitation #77-105296-3400 for furnishing a Bookmobile for the County Library. Low and only Bid submitted by: The Gerstenslager Co. Total Amount: $41,010.00 HEJ/djr Enclosure ~ ~ .... Baker Equipment Engr Co 1700 Summ±t Avenue P. O. Box 25609 Richmond, VA 23260 -~.ngham GMC Trucks, Inc. 3617 Nine Mile Road Richmond, VA 23223 Blue Bird Body company P. O. Box 42 Greenville, VA 24440 Boyertown Body & Eqp. Co. 230 South ReadSng Avenue Boyertown, PA 19512 Cheek & Shockley Auto Traile~ 600 West Hundred Road Chester, V±rginia 23831 Fruehauf Corporat±on P. O. Box 6697 Richmond, V~ 23230 The Gerste~slager Company 1425 East Bowman Street woos r, ~t[~.: Mr. Darle Daye Hechler Chevrolet, Inc. 4810 N±ne H±le Road .Richmond, VA 23223 International Harvester Compa P. O. Box 6953 R±chmond, VA 23230 (D ~D I c) c) ~'-tl Baker Equipment Engr. Co., 1700 Summit Avenue ?. O. Box 25609 Richmond, VA 23260 Bi~gham GMC Trucks, Inc. '' 3617 Nine Mile Roa'd Richmond, VA 23223 Blue Bird Body Company ~ O P. O. Box 42 O Greenville, VA 24440 Boyertown Body & Eqp. Co. 230 South Reading Avenue Boyertown, PA 19512 Cheek & Shockley Auto Traile~le~ 600 West Hundred Road Chester, Virginia 23831 Fruehauf Corporation P. O. Box 6697 Richmond, VA 23230 The Oerstenslager Company 1425 East Bowman Street ~ooster, Ohio 44691 ~810 N~ne ~le Road R~chmond~ VA 23223 International Harvester Company P. O. Box 6953 Richmond, VA 23230 NOTICE B. S. Auqust 24, 1977 12. That the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County, on Wednesday, August 24, 1977, beginning at 2:30 p.m., in the County Board Room at Chesterfield Courthouse, Virginia, will take under consideration the rezoning and the granting of Conditional Uses on the parcels of land described herein. ~77S094 In Dale Magisterial District, ROCK CONSTRUCTION COMPANY requests rezoning from Agricultural (A) to Residential (R-15) of a 52.1 acre parcel fronting 743.38 feet on Crumpland Road, located approximately 1900 feet ~~7~stheast of its intersection with Q%~lla Road. Tax Map 93 (1) 8 (Sheet 30). 121. In Midlothian Magisterial District, RICHARD F. BOZARD, et. als. request rezoning from Agricultural (A) to Residential (R-40) of a 55 acre parcel fronting 637.32 feet on Winterfield Road, located approximately 1600 feet north of its intersection with Netherfield Drive. Tax Map 7-1 (1) 1 (Sheet 2).  7S021 In Bermuda Magisterial District, FLORINE A. STRICKLAND reauests r~-~ng from Agricultural (A) to Convenience BusineSs (B-l) of a 1..0 acre parcel, fronting approximately 250 feet on Iron Bridge Road, located approximately .200 feet west of its intersection with Womack Road. _Map 115-9 (1) 14-1. (Sheet 32). ~S143 In Bermuda Mag'i~teriai District, REALTY INDUSTRIES requests ] /rezoning from Agricultural (A) to Residential (R-7) and. a Conditional Use to permit the construction of 192 multi-family units on a 16 acre parcel located 308.9 feet off the west line of Jefferson Davis Highway measured from a point approximately 450 feet south of the intersection (underpass) of Jefferson Davis Highway and the SCL Railroad. Tax ~ap 149-3 (1) 1 (Sheet 41); [ ~14J In Midlothi~n Magisterial District IMOGENE A. PURDY requests ~-rezon~ng from Agricultural (A) to General Business (B-3) of a 0.80 acre parcel fronting approximately 140 feet on Midlothian Turnpike located approximately 160 feet west of its intersection with Pocono Drive. '~Map '17-7 (1) 18 (S~eet 8). 47 In Matoaca Magisterial District, REM ENTERPRIZES, INC. requests~ nd[tional Use to Permit the operation of a public and private ciub aha Recreational Facilities in a ConVenience Business (B-l) DiStrict on a 0.60 acre parcel fronting approximately 190 feet on James Street, located approximately 100 feet southwest of its intersection with Chesterfield Avenue. Tax Map 182-9 (8) 1, 2 & 3 Orange Hill, Blodk~L, Lots 1,2 & 3 (Sheet 53/54). 77S1~" In Clover Hill Magisterial District, SOUTHPORT CORPORATI©N, re~e~ts an amendment to a Conditional Use (Case ~73S0!3) to eliminate ~~ 25 foot screen as shown on the Master Site Plan in a Light Industrial (M-l) District on a 71.81 acre parcel frontinq approximately 25~ feet on Midlothian Turnpike, located at~ the intersection of ~4idlothian Turn- ~ike and Southlake Boulevard and known as Southport. Tax ~ap 17-10 (2) 4 & 4-1 Southport (Sheet 8). *These cases were deferred by the Board of Supervisors at a previous meeting to their August 24, 1977 meeting. 1 _ 77S1~'~ In Bermuda Magisterial District, WILLIA_~ E. IRVING & WILLIkM ~. ~~S 'request an amendment to conditions ~1 and ~2! of a Conditional Use (Case #77S022) to allow uses as permitted in a B-1 District and to allow outside storage on a 2.25 acre parcel fronting 243.30 feet on East Hundred Road located approximately 1700 feet west of its intersection with Kingsto~..~Avenue. Tax Map 118-10 (3) 26C Bermuda Ochre, Lot 26 C (Sheet 33). ~7S1_~ In Bermuda Magisterial District TAYLOR-KING ENTERPRISES, INC. ~~t a renewal of a Conditional Use to permit the operation of a T~frkey Shoot in a Light Industrial (M-l) District on a 2 acre parcel, ~art ~f a larger parcel, fronting approximately 375 feet on Wiilis Road and located approximately 150 feet east of its intersection with Southwood Road. Tax Map 82-2 (2) 14 Gravel Pit Farms, Lot 14 (Sheet 23). Copies of these amendments are on file in the Department of Community Development, Development Review Division, 7714 Whitepine Road, Airport Industrial Park, Chesterfield, VA for public examination between the hours of 8:30 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. of each regular business day. APPLICANT AND/OR AGENT MUST BE PRESENT AT HEARING. Ail persons favoring or opposing the granting of the above requests are invited to appear at the time and place herein stated. .. . derson, Jr Chief Division of Development Review 2 J 3'ust 24, 1977 (B.S.) CASE NUMBER: 77S094 APPLICANT: ROCK CONSTRUCTION COMPANY REQUEST'& PROPOSED USE: The rezoning from Agricultural (A) to Residential (R-15). The Applicant plans to subdivide this property and construct approximately 49 single family dwellings. The Planning Commission gave tentative approval to the proposed subdivision of Huntwood on April 26, 1977. GENERAL LOCATION & TAX MAP IDENTIFICATION: In Dale Magisterial District, this parcel lies along the southeast line of Crumpland Road and is located approximately 1900 feet northeast of its intersection with Qualla Road. Tax,Map 93 (1) Parcel 8 (Sheet 30). ACREAGE, EXISTING ZONING, EXISTING LAND USE (SUBJECT PARCEL): 52.1 acres, Agricultural (A), vacant and undeveloped. ADJACENT AND AREA ZONING AND LAND USE: All adjacent property immedicately adjacent to this parcel is zoned Agricultural (A) and is wooded and vacant, except for the property to the west which is zoned Residential (R-7), which is vacant or occupied by single family dwellings. UTILITIES, SOIL PROFILE, DRAINAGE AND EROSION,~REQUIRED OFF-SITE EA'SEMENTS: Public water and sewer is not available to serve this property. Develop- ment of this property under the proposed Residential (R-15) classification with the use of individual septic tanks and wells would permit a density of .approximately 49 lots. Soils on this property are primarily sandy 'loam and wet, gently sloping to sloping and under present conditions, have a' Slight chance for erosion. Due' to soil conditions, it is doubtful if 49 usable lots can be designed based on the use of a septic tank and drainfield system. It is estimated that at least 50% of this parcel is poorly suited for septic tanks and drainfields. Consideration should be given to the location of a drain- field area on each lot prior to recording the record plat. See attached soil study map. This parcel-lies in the Third Branch Drainage Pattern. Due to the topography and soil conditions, drainage and erosion problems are anticipated on this property during its development; therefore, a site plan and erosion control plan should be approved prior to clearing or construction. Off-site drainage easements will be required. PUBLIC FACILITIES: Based on the 1977 average of 0.90 public school students per single family dwelling, approximately 44 puPils would be generated by this development. This subdivision is now within the Winterpock Elementary, Clover Hill Junior High and Senior High School attendance zones. This subdivision will be served by the Clover Hill Fire Station, Company %7, a volunteer unit. Fire service capability for this project will be severely limited due to the lack of an adequate water supply. 1. over TRANSPORTATION & TRAFFI~ Single family developm~ a under the requested Residential (R-15) zoning would result in the generation of approximately 480 average daily traffic based on an estimate of 9.8 trips per single family residence. These vehicular movements would be distributed over Crumpland Road and Christiana Road, now adjacent to or within the proposed development. The State Highway Department's 1976 Secondary Traffic Counts are shown on the attached traffic map. GENERAL PLAN: Agricultural (A) REQUEST ANALYSIS: In this case, the Applicant, who is the property owner, requests the rezoning from Agricultural (A) to Residential (R-15) of the subject property. The Applicant plans to subdivide this property for single family residential use and create approximately 49 building lots. Water and sewer will be provided by individual wells and septic tanks. Drainage will consist of roadside ditches. ALTERNATIVES & MITIGATING MEASURES: Staff notes that Beaverwood Sub- division lies north of this property and is zoned Residential (R-15) and that Rocky Run lies southwest of the proposed development and is also zoned Residential (R-15). Staff finds that the properties adjacent to the subject parcel are primarily zoned Agricultural (A)~ and are large parcels with a good potential for future subdivision. In this situation were public water and sewer will not be available for a considerable period of time, Staff takes the position that zoning control should be exercised whereby larger lot sizes are guaranteed through zoning or order to provide for the eventuality of septic tank and drainfield system failure. In addition, this spediffc_ area is relatively sparcely developed and R-25 rezoning would not be incompatible with adjacent and area future use. C.P.C 5 17 77: B.S. APPLICANT CASE HISTORY AND PAST COMMISSION AND BOARD ACTION FOR THIS REQUEST Recommended approval of the requested Residential (R-15) rezoning. 6 22-77: Further hearing of this request was deferred to the August 24, 1977 Board of Supervisors meeting in order to allow the applicant an opportunity to work out problems relative to access. ~ k2 ~7: Indicated to Staff that an additional sixty (60) day deferral was in order. ./ .-/ ,./ /! CASE NUMBER: 77S121 APPLICANT: RICHARD F. BOZARD, ET.AL. REQUEST AND PROPOSED USE: The rezoning from Agricultural (A) to Resi- dential (R-40). The-Applicant plans to construct 16 single family dwellings on this property. Planning Commission gave tentative approval to the proposed subdivision of Winterfield Ridge on May 24, 1977. GENERAL LOCATION AND TAX MAP IDENTIFICATION: In Midlothian Magisterial District, this parcel fronts along the west line of Winterfield Road and is located approximately 1600 feet north of its intersection with Netherfield Drive. Tax Map 7-1 (1) Parcel 1 (Sheet 2). ACREAGE, EXISTING ZONING, EXISTING LAND USE (SUBJECT PARCEL): Approxi- mately 54 acres, zoned Agricultural (A), vacant and wooded. ADJACENT AND AREA ZONING:AND .LAND USE: Ail adjacent .property is zoned Agricultural (A) except that to the southeast, which is zoned Residential (R-15). The subdivision of Salisbury lies to the southeast of this property, while all other properties are vacant and wooded or occupied by single family dwellings. UTILTTIES, SOIL PROFILE, DRAINAGE AND EROSION, REQUIRED OFF-SITE EASEMENTS: The Applicant plans 'to use individual wells and septic tanks in this development. Staff finds that public water is available to serve this property. A 16 inch water line is located along Winterfield and Netherfield Drive, approximately 1600 feet from this property. It would cost approximately $16,00~ to ~roVide water for thi~ parcel. The Utilities Department currently reports that an average single family residence uses 240 gallons of water per day; therefore, 3840 gallons of water per day would be utilized by this development. These per unit flows are not line design flows because peak flow plus fire service flow must be considered for design purposes. There is an available ~ water treatment capacity of 10 million gallons, per day from Swift Creek,' serving this area with 4 to 6 million gallons per day now being used. This parcel lies in the Roberts Branch Sewage Drainage Area. The closest sewer trunk is located along Falling Creek; therfore, it is not feasible that this parcel be served~by public sewer. The ~oils on this property are primarily sandy loam, gently sloping to steep, and under present conditions, have only a moderate chance for ..~rosion. Better than 80% of the soils on this property are poor for foundations and unfavorable for drainfields. This parcel lies in the Bernard's Creek Drainage Pattern. Due to the topography of this property, drainage and erosion problems are antici- pated during construction; therefore, no clearing should begin until a site plan and erosion control plan have been approved. Off-site drainage easements will be required. PUBLIC FACILITIES: Based the 1977 average of 0.9'~.ublic soho01 students per single f~m~ ly dwelling, approximately 15 students .will be gener~te~ by this., development. This subdivision is now within the Robious Elementary, an~ Junior High Schools and .Mialothian High .School attendance zones,, This subdivision will .be'served by-the Midlothian .Fire Station, Com- pany '%5, a volunteer unit. Fire service capabil, ity will be extremely limite~ unless public water is extended to this property from Winter- field and Netherfield Roads. TRANSPORTATION .AND TRAFFIC: Single family development under the requested R-40 zoning would result .in the generation, of approximately 157 average daily traffic based on an estimate of-9.8-trips per single family - residence. These ~vehicular movements would be distributed over Winterfield Road, '.now adjacent :to .the proposed development. Presently, Winterfield Road is being~hardsur~aced in. the area of .the request and is in fair .to.good condition. The 'Highway Department's 1976 Secondary Average Daily Traffic Count. along Winterfield Road, {n the area of the request, was. 374 ~%DT. GENERAL PLAN: Agricultural (A) use REQUEST ANALYSIS: The .Applicant, who .is the-property owner, requests the rezoning from Agricultural.(A) to Residential (R-40). The Applicant plans to subdivide this-property.and create.16 building lots. The. Applicant states that the.average lot area will be 3..36 acres, the minimum lot area, 1.10 acres and the maximum lot area, _8.00 acres. The Applic.ant plans to use private wells and-septic tanks and to provide roadside ditches. The Planning Commission gave _tentative approval to Winterfield Ridge on May 24, 1977. See attached subdivision plat.' ALTERNATIVES AND MITIGATING MEASURES: 'Staff finds that.the property to the south is zoned Residential (R~15) and~is occupied.by .Salisbur~ Subdivision. Adjacent property to the north, west a-d south is zoned Agricultural (A) and-is large vacantparcels with.a good potential for -future subdivision. Given the conditions.of land use and zoning in the area, the requested R-40 rezoning is appropriate. CASE HISTORY ~ND P~ST COMMIS'SION AND BOARDACTION C.P.C. 6 21 77: Recommended approval of R-40 rezoning. B.S. 7 27 77: Deferred due to the applicants failure to have his case represented. "'*ii: ~i,' .il; 'Z S. August 24, 1977 g~y-~97-~9~-4~P~ M~eh-~7-~gqq-4~=~ CA5-- :iJ_-:~E R: 77S021 A_~?LICA~:T: FLORINE A. STRICKLA~D RE%UEYT ~ PEO?OSED USE: Requests rezoning from Agricultural (A) ~c Convenience Business (B-l). It is the intent of the applicant to construct a real estate office on this parcel. GEXE?J.L LCCATION & TAX MAP IDENTiFiCATION: In Bermuda Magisterial Dis%rlz~, this parcel fronts along the north line of Iron Bridge Road, located approximately 260 feet west of the intersection with Womack Road. Tax Map 115-9 (1) Parcel .14-1 (Sheet 32). AC ..... =-., EXISTING ZONING, EXISTIXG LAND USE (SUBJECT PARCEL): The parce2 is 1 acre in area, is zoned Agricultural (A) and is presently vacant. ~D3ACEXT & AREA ZONING & LAND USE: Adjacent property to the east is zoned Convenience Business (B-l), while all other property is zone~ for Agricultural (A). Adjacent property to the east is occupie~ by a real estate office, while all other adjacent proper5y is occupied by single family-dwellings or remains vacant. UTILITIES, SOIL PROFILE, DRAINAGE & EROSION, REQUIRED OFF-SITE EASEMENTS Public water is located along Route 10, approximately 300 feet west of Buckingham Street. Water is approximately 1200 feet from the subject parcel. The Engineer advise~ that public water is available for development and if extended by the developer would cost auprcximately $24,000. An off-site water easement will b~ required along Route 10. The Engineer recommends that the use of public ~ water be investigated by the applicant.~ This parcel lies in the Proctors Creek drainage area. public sewer on this parcel is not feasible. The use of At the present time, there are no existing off-site drainage or erosion problems on this parcel nor should the proposed project. cause erosion problems. No drainage easements will be required. Soils on this parcel are loamy clay and sand in nature, and the property gently slopes towards Route 10. There is a slight erosion ch=--racterist of the soil. These soils are well suited for roadways and good to fair for building foundations. It is reco~nded that if a septic tank system is used on this property, that the drainfield area be located before clearing for'construction takes place. PUBLIC FACILITIES Development of the parcel in question under cor~.ercial zoning should exercise no additional impact on either existing or future area public facilities. TPA]'E?SF. TATIO/~ ~T?S. FFI~: Althou%h pre!im;~ry plans have not caen sucr:~{%' %.;ith this application, l{'-~s anticipated that %he prcF-osed structure will front along ~oute 10, and access to the parcel would be by Womack Road which is located, to the east. Staff notes that Womack Road is in the State system; however, it remains an unimproved dirt road. It intersects with Route 10 and continues to the north for a distance of approximately 300 feet. There are no plans for a crossover at the intersection of Womack Road and Route 10. Route 10,. itself, at this location has been approved for a 4-lane divided highway. GEI~RAL PLAN: This parcel lies in an area desSgnated for single ~ar~ly residential use. REQUEST ANALYSIS: The applicant has a real estate purchase contract with Norman J. Crowder, the Present property owner. The applicant states that this land is adjacent to the office of Strickland Realty Company, and if the request is approved, she intends to add to the present real estate building at a future time. ALTE~;ATIVES & MITIGATING MEASURES: On January 9, 1974, the Board of Supervisors approved the rezoning from Agricultural (A) to Convenience Business (B-l) on the parcel directly adjacent and to the east of the subject request. The Planning Commission in considering the previous applicantion (Case Number 73S153) noted that the rezoning of the subject parcel might set a precedence for strip co~mercial zoning and use along the newly realigned location of Route 10. It was pointed out by Planning Staff that such use and development would not conform with desirable development' trends intended for the Route 10 corridor between the village of Chester and the County Courthouse Complex. In considering the request, the Commission resolved to recommend that the rezoning be denied but a Conditional Use under the existing agricultural classification be granted for operation of a real estate and professional office subject to a number of conditions. When the matter was presented to the Board, Staff argued that strip commercial zoning would result if B-1 rezoning was approved. In the request now being considered, the applicant is the same individual who requested B-1 rezoning on the adjacent property in 1974. Staff is of the opinion that the current application represents an example of the concern that was expressed in the 1974 case.~ ~ If this request is approved, strip commercial zoning cannot be forstalled along Route 10 and without some sort of planned land use control pattern for this artery, commercial development thereof and resulting problems already experienced by the County will be similar to those problems resulting from the lack of planning for commercial development along the Route 1 and Route 60 corridors. If the westerly route for proposed 1-95 is established, the crossing of Route 10 in this area may prove a more proper location for commercial development. In a~dition,,,~ince the intended use is f~.an office building, rezonin$ the arcel to the B-1 classific ion is neither apprcpriate nor justified since this use can be accomplished in the Office Business (0) .zone. Dmother'land use option would be as previously recommended by the Co~nission in the 1974 r~quest to grant a Conditional Use fcr office operation subject to appropriate conditions. ST~3F RECO:.'2~ENDATION: DENIAL OF THE REQUEST IS RECO~4ENDED. CASE HISTORY AND CO~MISSION AND BOARD ACTION FOR THIS REQUEST. C.P.C. 1 18 77: At the request of the Applicant, this case was deferred- 30 days. The purpose of the deferral was to provide the Applicant time in which to obtain a Contract of Agreement with the property owner. The Applicant has also indicated that rezoning to the Office Business (O) District would be acceptable. C.P.C. 2 15 77: Deferred at the request of the Applicant. Note: After reviewing the Applicant's request for a third deferral, of consideration of this matter, Planning Staff is of the opinion that the Commission should not defer this request any longer. Our office cites that each instance of deferral requires re- notification as prescribed by ~aw, and ~his process is both expensive and cumbersome. .in addition, the Commission's docket as of late has been extremely heavy_ and continued deferrals tend to impede the Commission's review and recommendation process. Wh~t is of more concern however, is the appropriate- ness of the application in light of the property owners-apparent attitude relative to pursuing closing the real estate purchase contract upon which the Applicant is establishing vested interest in making this rezoning request. In ligh~ of these facts, the Division of Development Review would recommend to the Commission that they hear this case on its merits at their March-15, 1977 meeting and all other considerations being equal, dispose of the matter by making the appropriate recommendation and referring the case to the Board of Supervisors for their determination. C.P.C. 3 15 ~77: The Applicant requested that the Commission defer this request 12'0 days in order that she would have time to resolve the contract agreement problems associated with the purchase of this property. Staff is of the opinion that the Applicant is now prepared to move on with the hearing 6f this request a~d' would accept rezoning of this parcel to the Office Business (O) classification.. C.P.C. 7 19 77: It was resolved to recommend Office 'Business (O) zoning subject to the following conditions: A buffer strip having a width of not less than 50 feet shall be provided along VA Highway 10. This buffer shall remain in a natural state and shall not be used for locating buildings, driveways, or parking lots. e Access to this parcel shall be from Womack Road. No access to this parcel shall be permitted either now or in the future from VA 10. 4 \ \ \ 0 .,\ A~ st 24, 1977 (B. S.) ~- ~9 ?-~ 9 ~-~CrPr~ r) CASE NUMBER: 77S143 APPLICANT: REALTY INDUSTRIES REQUEST'& PROPOSED USE: The rezoning from Agricultural (A) to Residential (R-7) and a Conditional Use to permit the construction of 192 multiple family units. GENERAL LOCATION & TAX MAP IDENTIFICATION: In Bermuda Magisterial District, this parcel is located 308 feet off the west line of Jefferson Davis Highway, measured from a point approximately 450 feet south of the intersection (underpass) of Jefferson Davis Highway and the ACL Rail- road. Tax Map 149-3 (1) Parcel 1 (Sheet 41). ACREAGE, EXISTING ZONING, EXISTING LAND USE (SUBJECT PARCEL): area, zoned Agricultural (A) and presently vacant. 16 acres in ADJACENT AND AREA ZONING AND LAND USE: Adjacent property to the north, west and south is zoned Agricultural (A), while property to the south- east and east is zoned General Business (B-3) and Community Business (B-2). Adjacent properties are occupied by single family dwellings or remain vacant. UTILITIES, SOIL PROFILE, DRAINAGE AND EROSION, REQUIRED OFF-SITE EASEMENTS: Public water is available to serve this property. A 24 inch water line is located along the east line of Route 1, opposite this parcel. The Utilities Department currently reports that multiple family units use 150 million gallons of water per day; therefore, 28,800 gallons per day would be utilized by this development. These per unit flows are not line design flows, because peak flow plus fire service flow must be considered for design purposes. This parcel lies in the Ashton Creek Sewer Drainage Area. The use of public sewer is feasible. The closet trunk sewer is located along Ashton Creek, north of this property. The Utilities Department calculates per capita sewage flow at 100 gallons per day for design purposes. Based on an average of 2.5 persons per multiple family dwell- ing unit, approximately 48,000. gallons per day of sewage effluent would be generated for treatment by the proposed apartment project. This project will be served by the Proctors Creek Treatment Plan. Soils on this property are and wet and sandy loam, gently sloping to steep with only a moderate chance for erosion under present conditions. This parcel is divided by upland drains and these areas are poorly suited '"for the proposed project. Low areas should be retained for open space. Chances for severe erosion and sedimentation will increase if clearing is not controlled. This parcel lies in the Ashton Creek Drainage Pattern. Drainage and erosion problems are anticipated during construction; therefore, no clearing or construction shall begin prior to the approval of a site plan and an erosion control plan. Off-site easements will be required for sewer and drainage. PUBLIC FACILITIES: Based on the 1977 average of 0.2D public school students per multiple family dwelling unit, approximately 48 pupils would be generated by this development. This apartment complex is now within the Harrowgate Elementary, Chester Intermediate and Thomas Dale High School attendance zones. This. apartment complex will be served by the Chester Fire Station, Company #1, which is operated by County employees. Fire service capability will be limited due to the distance from the nearest fire station. Fire hydrants will be required throughout the development to compensate for the delay imposed by the distance from the fire station. All units must be provided with 2 independent exit ways from each indivi- dual building. TRANSPORTATION & TRAFFIC: This multiple family development will result in the generation of approximately 1,400 average daily traffic based on an estimate of 7.5 trips per multiple family dwelling. These vehicular movements would be distributed over Jefferson Davis Highway, which is now adjacent to the proposed development. The State Highway Department' 1976 Primary and Secondary Average Daily Traffic Counts are shown on the attached traffic map. Jefferson Davis Highway, in the area of the request, is in poor to good condition. There are no planned improvements for this road in the near future. GENERAL PLAN: Single family residential use. REQUEST ANALYSIS: The Applicant has an option agreement to purchase this property from Suzie M. Hudson. The Applicant requests the rezoning from Agricultural (A) to Residential (R-7) and a Conditional Use to permit the construction of 192 multiple family dwelling units. See attached tentative site plan. ALTERNATIVES AND MITIGATING MEASURES: Staff notes that the property to the north, west and south is zoned Agricultural (A) and are large vacant parcels with a good potential for future subdivision. Staff finds that the property along the east line of Jefferson Davis Highway, opposite the subject property, is zoned General Industrial (M-2) and is large vacant parcels with the Seaboard Coastline Railroad running north-south through these properties. In general, this property has a good potential for future industrial development. Staff believes that in looking at this request, future land use compatibi- lity as well as proper access should be considered. The majority of adjacent property remains undeveloped, vacant wooded land which has potential for development, as noted above. In this respect, reasonable buffering of the parcel should be considered. With regard to access, .'Staff would note that 192 units are planned and access for these units is restricted to Jefferson Davis Highway. Although the site plan presented with the application shows a boulevard type entrance. The internal driveway system that is proposed would preclude a second access for the majority of these units. Specifically, if a single access is allowed, the boulevard entrance should be connected to a loop driveways which could serve all the units from two directions (east & west). With the present plan as proposed a blockage of the driveway in the vicinity of Building 14B at the entrance to the project would prohibit emergency as well as normal vehicular traffic from access to over 3/4 of the unit in the proposed development. In considering other aspects of this use, the below recommended conditions are normal and customary when considering multi-family development in the County. o STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approval of the request is recommended subject to the implementation of the following conditions: 1. A 35 foot buffer strip shall be provided along all property lines. These buffers shall be left in state with no grading or cutting of existing vegetation greater than 3 inches in caliper permitted. The only exception to this requirement shall be the required opening in the east buffer for the access road. 2. A separate parking area shall be established for all boats, campers, and trailers. This area shall contain at least 10 percent of the required automobile parking spaces and shall be in addition to the automobile spaces (346 spaces) required for this 192 dwelling unit development. (It is estimated than an additional 35 spaces would be required for boats, campers and trailers.) 3. All buildings shall be setback a minimum of 15 feet from any parking area and a minimum of 25 feet from any driveway. 4. Building permits shall not be issued for more than 50 dwelling units until such time as a loop driveway, approved by the Division of Development Review, is constructed to provide a second access to the remaining units from the entrance shown on the preliminary plan. The entrance shall b~-twenty feet (minimum) wide roads separated by a minimum 4 foot wide median. * 5. The following recreational facilities shall be provided: a. One tot-lot for each 50 dwelling units. Building permits for these tot-lots shall be required in conjunction with any apart- ment construction. Tot-lots shall be completed with conjunc- tion with apartment occupancy. b. Recreational facilities for adoults shall be expanded to include tennis and swimming and/or a club house building. Permits for these facilities shall be issued prior to the issuance of the building permit for the 101st dwelling unit. These facilities shall be completed prior to the issuance of certificate of occupancy for the 101st unit. e Detailed site plans shall be submitted as Ordinance. required by the Zoning 7. Public water and sewer shall be used. 8: The number of apartments shall not exceed 12 5 units per gross acre. - 9. Any right-of-way required by the State Highway Department for turning lanes or other improvements along Route 1, necessitated by this development shall be deeded to and for the County of Chester- field prior to the issuance of any building permit. 10. Ail driveways and parkings areas shall be paved, curbed and guttered. 11. All structures shall be separated by a minimum of 30 feet. 12. Sidewalks shall be required adjacent to all public parking areas. These walks shall be at least 4 feet in width in the areas where parked automobiles will overhang the sidewalk. On motion of Mr. Currin, seconded by Mr. Belcher, it was resolved to recommend approval of Residential (R-7) zoning and a Conditional Use to permit the construction of 192 multiple family units subject to the following conditions: C.P.C. 7 19 77: C~SE HI~TO~Y AND PAST COMMISSION AND .BOAP~ ACTION FOR THIS REQUEST Approval of the request was recommended subject to the following condition: e * 5. A 35 foot buffer strip shall be provided along all property lines. These buffers shall be left in state with no grading or cutting of existing vege- tation greater than 3 inches in caliper permitted. The only exception to this requirement shall be the required opening in the east buffer for the access road. A separate parking area shall be established for all boatsI campers, and trailers. This area shall contain at least 20 parking spaces in addition to the auto- mobile spaces (346 spaces) required for this 192 dwelling unit development. Ail buildings shall be setback a minimum of 15 feet from any parking area and a minimum of 25 feet from any driveway. Building permits shall not be issued for more than 50 dwelling units until such time as a loop driveway, approved by the Division of Development Review, is constructed to provide a second access to the remain- ing units from the entrance shown on the preliminary plan. The entrance shall be twenty feet (minimum) wide roads separated by a minimum 4 feet wide median. The following recreational facilities shall be provided: One tot-lot for each 50 dwelling units. Building permits for these tot-lots shall be required in conjunction with apartment occupancy. e g e 10. 11. 12. Be Recreational facilities for adults shall be expanded to include 2 tennis'courts and 1 1/2 basketball courts. Permits for these facilities shall be issued prior to the issuance of the building permit for the 101st dwelling unit. These facilities shall be completed prior to the issuance of certificate of occupancy for the 101st unit. Detailed site plans shall be submitted as required by the Zoning Ordinance. Public water and sewer shall be used. The number of apartments shall not exceed 12.5 units per gross acre. Any right-of-way required by the State Highway Department for turning lanes or other improvements along Route 1, necessitated by this development shall be deeded to and for the County of Chesterfield prior to the issuance of any building permit. Ail driveways and parkings areas shall be paved, curbed and guttered. Ail structures shall be separated by a minimum of 30 feet. Sidewalks shall be required adjacent to all public parking areas. These walks shall be at least 4 feet in width in the areas where parked automobiles will overhang the sidewalk. *Change from Staff Recommendation *:%, /'/ st/ zo~l~ 5' ~.'Z'8 W' ,CV.I'?'~,,¢T .. 15003 Happy Hill Road Colonial Heights, Va. 23834 August 19, 1977 Board of Supervisors Chesterfield County Chesterfield Courthouse, Va. 23832 Gentlemen: We are attaching a copy of our letter written in July stating our opposition to the rezoning of property fronting on the Jefferson Davis Highway and extending back to the eastern boundary of our property. This week we received further notice that the case would be con- sidered by the Board of Supervisors at 2:30 p.m., Wednesdays August 24th. Inasmuch as o~r jobs prevent our being present at the public hearing, we would like to reiterate our opposition to the proposed 192 multi-family housing project. Living in a rural area necessitates each family having one or more cars. Even if each family had only one car, there would be an additional 192 vehicles entering and leaving the proposed site creating additional safety hazards to an already dangerous road situation. If single'family housing were constructed on the property, there would not be such a large volume o~ traffic. We believe a personal visit to the site by the Board Members would support our contention. We again respectfully request that the attached copy of our previous letter be considered at the time of the public hearing. Edward S. Eastman, Sr. Vera D. Eastman Colonial Heights, Va. 23834 July 14, 1977 Chesterfield County Planning Commission c/o Mr. Stanley R. Ba!derson, Jr. ~ss~o ~=n~ Secretary ~_ ~nt of Community Development Chesterfield Comnty Cues ~errze~, Va. 2~832 On Tuesday, July i2, we received the a'~tached notice by certified mail. Dme to a prior commitment, we will be in Minnesota on Tuesday, July 19, when the matter is considered by the Planning Commission. ~hat reason, we would like ~his letter introduced as our protest against the proposed rezoning. We have been the owners and residents of 45 acres of land immediately adjacent to the proposed multi-family housing project since 1950. We have been approached many times by individuals wishing to pumchase land but have always refused, preferring the quiet, rural setting. We view -this proposal as detrimental to the residents of the county for several reasons: (1) The entrance and/or exit to the housing project would be on Jefferson Davis Highway at an already dangerous location. Many accidents have occurred at Holt's curve which is just north of the property -~he railroad underpass presents safety hazards to traffic especially in the winter when the roads are icy; the hill beginning at the railroad underpass and continuing past ~he proposed housing site would make entry and exit hazardous because of poor visibility; there is a narrow median s~rip in the highway in front of the property which would make it neces- sary for residents wishing to ~ravei north to go south and then make a U-~urn~ crea-~ing additional hazards. (2) The proposed multi-family development would bring urban problems ~o a ~raditionally rural setting, requiring more fire and police pro~ection.- (3) Multi-family housing would require sewage and water facilities which are not presently available to previously established residences in Bermuda District and at the same time probably increase taxes for the purposes of providing such facilities. (4) Such a large development would, without question, be occupie~ by families with many children requiring additional school facilities and ~an~por~tzon. Are these available at the present or would additional schools or school additions and buses be required? We assume that only those persons owning property immediately adjacent to the development received notices of the public hearing. We believe ~ha~ if other residents of the community were aware of the situation, many more would voice 'their opposition and present other objections than those we have stated. We respectfully request That the Planning Commission consider objections before making their decision in the matter. Sincerely, Edward S. Eastman Vera D. ~.astman A ust 24, 1977 (B.S.) CASE NUMBER: 77S144 APPLICANT: IMOGENE A. PURDY REQUEST'& PROPOSED USE: The rezoning from Agricultural (A) to General Business (B-3). The Applicant has not stated what type of use she plans to make of this property. GENERAL LOCATION & TAX MAP IDENTIFICATION: In Midlothian Magisterial District, this parcel fronts along the north line of ~idlothian Turnpike and is located approximately 160 feet west of its intersection with Pocono Drive. Tax Map 17-7 (1) Parcel 18 (Sheet 8). ACREAGE, EXISTING ZONING, EXISTING LAND USE (SUBJECT PARCEL): Approximately 0.80 acres in area, zoned Agricultural (A) and occupied by a single family dwelling. ADJACENT AND AREA ZONING AND LAND USE: Adjacent property is zoned Agricul- tural (A). Property to the west is occupied by a Mobile Home Park while the remainder of the properties are occupied by single family dwellings or remain vacant. UTILITIES, SOIL PROFILE, DRAINAGE AND EROSION, REQUIRED OFF-SITE EASEMENTS: Public water is on site and available to serve this property. inch water line is located along Midlothian Turnpike. A 16 This parcel lies in the Pocoshock Creek Sewer Drainage Area. The closest trunk sewer is located along Pocoshock Creek. It will cost approximately $40,000 to bring sewer to this property. This property will be served by the Falling Creek Sewage Treatment Plant. Soils are gravelly fine and sandy loam, gently sloping and under present conditions have only a slight chance for erosion. These soils are well suited for the proposed use. This parcel lies in the Powhite Creek Drainage Pattern. Due to topo- graphy, drainage and erosion problems are anticipated during construction. No clearing or construction shall begin until a site plan and an erosion control plan have been approved by the County. Off-site easements will be required for sewage and drainage. PUBLIC FACILITIES: This property will be served by the Midlothian Fire ..Station, Company #5, which is a volunteer unit. Fire service capability in this area is adequate to serve this project. TRANSPORTATION AND TRAFFIC: In the area of the request, Midlothian Turn- pike is in good condition. It should be noted that the Highway Depart- ment's 1976 Primary Road Traffic Count show that the average dailey traffic in this area was 18,475 ADT. GENERAL PLAN: Commercial use. REQUEST ANALYSIS: The Applicant, who is the property owner, requests the rezoning from Agricultural (A) to General Business (B-3). At present, the Applicant has no specific use in mind for the property. ALTERnaTIVES & MITIGATING MEASURES: In this particular situation, the parcel in question lies within an area that within all probability will. be developed for commercial use. Intermittant properties, fronting along Midlothian in the vicinity of the request, have been commercially zoned; however, the Applicant has not demonstrated that there is either a need or justification for zoning the subject parcel to the requested General Business (B-3) classification; this is the highest intense commercial zone. Since no use is intended, the B-1 classification might be the more appropriate classification until such time as a specific use might warrant increased zoning. Moreover, the property to the north, fronting Robious Road will be effected by zoning permitted on the subject parcel. Higher intensity zoning and the resulting land use may have an adverse affect on this adjacent property resulting in pressures for further commercial zoning along Robious Road which heretofore, both the Commission and Board has considered inappropriate. Therefore, as an alternative to the request, the Commission should consider recommending a lesser zoning and/or reasonable buffering along the north property line. ST~3F RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the requested General Business (B-3) zoning be denied and that approval of no higher classifi- cation than Community Business (B-l) be allowed. If a higher commercial classification can, at this time, be justified, then Staff would further recommend that a buffer or not less than 50 feet be provided along the rear property line. This buffer shall consist of the retention of existing vegetation with no trees or shrubs being cut, removed or otherwise disturbed. Areas within the buffer which are clear for 200 square feet or greater shall be planted with evergreen plants and trees. C.P.C. 7 19 77: CASE HISTORY AND PAST COMMISSION AND BOARD ACTION FOR THIS REQUEST It was resolved to recommend Convenience Business (B-i) zoning subject to the condition that a 35'foot wide buffer be provided along rear property line. This buffer shall consist of the retention of the existing ~egetation with no trees or shrubs being cut, removed or otherwise disturbed. Areas within the buffer which are clear for 200 square feet or greater shall be planted with evergreen plants and trees. This buffer shall remain until the property to the rear is zoned for business use. e -: -~[Z:IZII, I l. Ij I il - - MH-I .B~2' . ~gust 24, 1977 (B.S.) CASE NUMBER: 77S147 APPLICANT: REM ENTERPRIZES, INC. REQUEST & PROPOSED USE: A Conditional Use to permit the operation of a puD~£c~and prrvate ~club land indoor recreational facilities. GENERAL LOCATION & TAX MAP IDENTIFICATION: In Matoaca Magisterial District, these lots front along the northwest line of James Street and are lo- cated approximately 100 feet southwest of its intersection with Chester- field Avenue. Tax Map 182-9 (8) Orange Hill, Block 1, Lots 1, 2 & 3 (Sheet 53/54). ACREAGE, EXISTING ZONING, EXISTING LAND USE (SUBJECT PARCEL): Approximately 0.60 acres in area, zoned Convenience Business (B-l) occupied by a Church. ADJACENT AND AREA ZONING AND LAND USE: Adjacent property to the west, north and east is zoned Covenience Business (B-l), while property to the south is zoned Residential (R-7). Adjacent property to the east is occupied by Ettrick Elementary School, while property to the north, west and south is occupied by commercial buildings or single family dwellings. UTILITIES, SOIL PROFILE, DRAINAGE AND EROSION, REQUIRED OFF-SITE EASEMENTS: Public water is available to serve this property. An eight inch water line is located on Chesterfield Avenue. The property will be served by the Ettrick Sanitary District. This property lies in the Appomattox River Sewage Area. The closest trunk sewer is located on Chesterfield Avenue. It will cost approximately $4,000 to bring sewer to this property. The property will be served by the Petersburg Sewage Treatment Plant. Soils are fine sandy loam, gently sloping and under present conditions, have only a slight chance for erosion. This property lies in the James River Drainage Pattern. Due to topo- graphy, drainage and erosion problems are anticipated during construction; therefore, no clearing or construction shall begin until a site plan and erosion control plan have been approved by the County. Off-site drainage easements will be required. PqBLIC FACILITIES: This property will be served by the Ettrick Fire Station, Company #12, which is operated by County employees. Fire service capability in this area is adequate to serve this project. TRANSPORTATION AND TRAFFIC: In the area of the request, Chesterfield Avenue and James Street are in fair condition. .There are no planned improve- ments for these roads in the near future. The State Highway Department's 1976 Primary Traffic Counts are shown on the attached traffic map. GENERAL PLAN: Commercial and single family residential use. REQUEST ANALYSIS: The Applicant, who is the property owner, reauests a Conditional Use to permit the operation of an indoor recreational facility on this parcel. See attached tentative site plan. ALTERNATIVES & MITIGATING MEASURES: This request represents use of an existing building which has previously been used as a Church and in the past.for similar such activities as requested in this application. The Applicant has indicated that the building would be used for wedding receptions, birthday parties, anniversary receptions, civic and social meetings, parties, dances, bingo playing and other uses normally associated with the community building. This structure is located in a B-1 zone and Staff is of the opinion that adjacent uses and zoning are compatible with the use proposed by this application. However, it should be noted that if approved, 48 parking spaces would be needed and driveways and parking spaces would have to be paved as per the require- ment in a B-1 zone. In addition, a 15 foot parking and building would be required from the James Street right-of-way. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Noting land use compability, approval of the request is recommended subject to the following conditions: This Conditional Use shall be granted to and for REM Enterprises, Inc., and shall not be transferrable nor run with the land. ¸2. This Conditional Use shall be granted for a period not to exceed 5 years from date of approval and may be renewed upon satisfactory reapplication and the demonstration that this Conditional Use has not proved a detriment to the neighborhood. e No activities associated with this use shall be held during normal school hours. The above noted conditions notwithstanding all bulk requirments as applicable in the B-1 zone shall be adhered to. The parking requirements are to be met prior to occupancy and a certificate of occupancy from the Building Official shall be acquired prior to using the property for the purposes of this Conditional Use. C.P.C. 7 19 77: CASE HISTORY AND PAST COMMISSION AND BOARD ACTION FOR THIS REQUEST It was resolved to recommend approval of a Conditional Use to permit the operation of public and private club indoor recreational facilities. This Conditional Use shall be granted to and for REM Enterprises, Inc., and shall not be transferrable nor run with the land. 2e e e Se This Conditional Use shall be granted for a period not to exceed 5 years from date of approval and amy be renewed upon satisfactory reapplication and the demonstration that this Conditional Use has not proved a detriment to the neighborhood. No activities associated with this use shall be held during normal school hours. The above noted conditions notwithstanding all bulk requirement as applicable in the B-1 zone shall be adhered to. The uses of this property are restricted to the following: wedding receptions, birthday parties, anniversary receptions, civic and social meetings, parties and dances for special occasions~~, 3 "TTRICK PA RK VIRGINIA STATE COL*L E GE /. ., Im 8-4 8-1 I 18-1 14¢ August 24, 1977 (B. S.) ~a~- ~,- ~qq- qE~ ~ ~ 4 CASE' NI/MBER: 77S148 'APPLICANT: SOUTHPORT CORPORATION REQUEST AND PROPOSED USE: An amendment to Conditional Use (Case ~73S013) to eliminate the 25 foot screen as shown on the Master Site Plan for the Southport Commercial Park. GENERAL LOCATION AND TAX MAP IDENTIFICATION: In Clover Hill Magisterial District, this property fronts approximately 250 feet on the south line of Midlothian Turnpike and is located at the intersection of Midlothian Turnpike and Southlake Boulevard. Tax Map 17-10 (2) Southport, Parcels 4, & 4-1 (Sheet 8). ACREAGE, EXISTING ZONING, EXISTING LAND USE (SUBJECT PARCEL): Approximately 71.81 acres in area, zoned~Lig~t Industrial (M-l). and occupied by several warehouses and office buildings. ADJACENT AND AREA ZONING AND LAND USE: Adjacent property to the north and west is zoned for business, while property to the south and east is zoned Agricultural (A). Adjacent properties are occupied by various types of commercial buildings or remain vacant. UTILITIES, SOIL PROFILE, DRAINAGE AND ERO'SION, REQUIRED OFF-SITE EASEMENTS: This request will have no effect on utilities, soil, drainage and erosion, or require off-site easements. PUBLIC FACILITIES: This request will have no effect on public facilities. TRANSPORTATION AND TRAFFIC: tion and traffic. This request will have no effect on transporta- GENERAL PLAN: Commercial and single family residential use. REQUEST ANALYSIS: The Applicant, who is the property owner, requests an amendment to a Conditional Use (Case ~73S013) to eliminate the 25 foot screen as shown on the Master Site Plan for theSouthport Commercial Park. The Applicant states that the 25 foot screen, where Southport properties abut other industrial and business zoned properties, is not required they state that property owners should have the option to buffer their .facilities from the adjoing properties and to make use of the area in the buffer strip if they feel adjacent properties are not detrimental to their own use. ALTERNATIVEs AND MITIGATING MEASURES: In considering this request, it is important to note emerging lan~ use trends in the area. Generally speaking, property to the west, north and northeast is developing for high intensity commercial use, While property to the south and east re- mains agriculturally zoned and varying proposals for development, including residential, commercial and industrial use have been forthcoming over the past several years. The purpose for the 25 foot screen shown on Southport's original Master Plan was twofold. Initially, the Southport development was represented to be a more sophisticated commercial and industrial park than-what has emerged to date, and it was felt that screening from adjacent commercial properties would protect the integrity of Southport. However, Southport developers have not felt that such protection is necessary. The second reason for imposing the condition was directed at protecting adjacent properties from possible adverse uses within the Southport development. STAFF RECOF~ENDATION: In considering both past and present development of adjacent property zoned General Business (B-3), it is felt that screening on the Southport development should be a matter of choice for the developer; however, given the uncertainty of the development of those adjacent agriculturally zoned parcels, it is further felt that the screening condition should be retained as long as these parcels remain either zoned or developed for agricultural or residential purposes. C.P.C. 7 19 77: CASE HISTORY AND PAST COMMISSION AND BOARD ACTION 'FOR THIS REQUEST It was resolved to recommend approval of an Amendment to Conditional Use 73S103 as follows: The 25 foot screen shown on the applicants original Master Plan shall be revised as follows: Such a screen shall be provided as a buffer strip along all adjacent property zoned either Agricultural or Residential. When the adjacent property is rezoned to a Commercial or Industrial classification, the reauirement for the buffer (i.e. 25 foot screen) shall be null and void. In all instances where the buffer is maintained, it shall constitute existing vegetation in a 25 foot strip. Ayes: Messers: Howard, Belcher, Bookman, Crump, Currin and Williams. ! iiiiiii ~IIiiiliiliiIiiIIPI111 !1 I]'LI''I~ / ! ; ! / / 'cow. :\ · ? LAw 0x-Frc~-s 0BE~SH~L~, HINNAI~IT, DOLBEARE ~c BEALE ONE NORTH FIFTH STREET August 22, 1977 Hon. E. Merlin O'Neill, Chairman Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors P. O. Box 40 Chesterfield, Virginia 23832 Re: Conditional Use 77S148 Southport Corporation Dear ~. O'Neill: On behalf of Weidmul!er Terminations, Incorporated, a neighbor of Southport Corporation and an owner in South- port Industrial Park, I write to express their support of the proposed elimination of the screens on the exterior of the property as the property joins other industriaI and commercial properties. Sincerely, Robert L. Dolbeare RLD:rs CC: Members, Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors Mr. Michael E. Ritz, .Director Community Development Chesterfield County Chesterfield, Virginia 23832 Southport Corporation c/o Mr. George B. Sowers, Jr., .Secretary 10833 ~dlothian Pike Richmond, Virginia 23235 'CASE NUMBER: 77S149 Auqust 24, 1977 (B.S.) APPLICANT: WILLIAM E. IRVING AND WILLIAM M. JONES REQUEST & PROPO'SED USE: An amendment to Conditions 91 & 92 of a Conditional Use ('Case"'"#77S022) to allow uses as permitted in a Convenience Business District and to allow outside sotrage. 'GENERAL' L'OCATION & TAX MAP IDENTIFICATION: In Bermuda Magisterial District, this parcel fronts along the north line of East Hundred Road and is located approximately 1700 feet west of ir'intersection with Kingston Avenue. Tax Map 118-10 (3) Bermuda Orche Lot 26 C (Sheet 33). ACREAGE, EXISTING ZONING, EXISTING LAND USE (SUBJECT PARCEL): Approximately 2.252 acres in area, zoned Agricultural (A) and presently vacant. A~D'JACENT AND AREA ZONING AND LAND USE: Property to the east, south and west is zoned Agricultural (A), while property to the north is zoned Residential (R-7). Adjacent properties are occupied by single family dwellings.or remain vacant. UTILITIES, SOIL PROFILE, DRAINAGE AND EROSION, REQUIRED OFF-'SITE ~ASE.MENTS: This request will have no effect on utilities, soil', drainage 'and erosion, or require off-site easements. 'PUBL'IC FACILITIES: This request will have no effect on publi~ facilities. TRANSPORTATION AND TRAFFIC: pattern in this area. This request will not effect the taaffic GENERAL PLAN: Single family residential use. REQUEST ANALYSIS: The Applicants, who are the property owners, request an amendment to Conditions 1 and 2 of a conditional Use (Case #77S022) to allow uses as permitted in a B-1 District and to allow outside storage. Specifically, th~ ~pplicants, request that. condition #l,~-which reads, "This Conditional Use shall permit the erection and operation of a single structure designed for the purpose of operating a cabinet shop", be changed to read, "This Conditional Use shall permit the erection and operation of a single structure designed for the purpose of operating any of those type businesses permitted in the Convenience Business (B-l) District." A~so, that Condition #2 which reads "No outside storage of materials, equipment, supplies or items for sale shall be permitted", be changed to read, "Outside storage of materials, equipment, supplies or items for sale be permitted." kL~ATI~S~'~&~MI~I~AT'ING~F~E~SURES: -In analyzing this request, it should be noted that in essence, the Applicants are requesting B-1 zoning with a B-3 type provision permitting outside storage. When the original application was made, it was the intent that a cabinet shop be constructed and operated on the parcel and the Commission and Board considered and approved the Conditional Use on that basis. The Applicants now want permission under the Conditional Use for a multitude of commercial purposes with little regulation as to how this use might be accomodated on this site. This requested amendment in the opinion of Staff is opposed to the 'original intent in granting the aforedeScribed Conditional Use. The Commission and Board in denying the Original request for rgzoning the property to Community Business (B-'2) cited that granting a limited Conditional Use such action would reduce t~e potential for uncontrolled strip commercial zoning in this area of the Route 10 corridor. If it is the intent to in fact condone commercial use in this area, then the issue should be faced squarely and this parcel and adjacent properties should be rezoned commercially thereby forestalling wasted effort in half-hearted attempts at establishing land use restraints along this section of Route 10. In considering the application alternatives open to the Commisssion would be (1) approve the application as requested, (2) amend condition ~1 by expanding uses permitted to include all B-1 uses while still retaining condition ~2 prohibiting outside storage of equipment, materials, supplies or items for sale; (3) denial of the applicants request, indicating khe intent to restrict commercial development in this area; (4) deferred the request for a 30 day period allowing amendment to the application requesting either Community Business (B-2) or General Business (B-3) rezoning (General Business (B-3) will permit outside storage whereas Community Business (B-2) will not.) 'STAFP RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that (2) above be approved and the Commission reaffirm its intent to limit commercial use in the area by not condoning unrestricted strip commercial development cf the Route 10 corridor from Hopewell to Jefferson Davis Highway. C.P.C. 7 19 77: CASE HISTORY AND PAST COMMISSION AND BOARD ACTION FOR THIS REQUEST It was resolved to recommend that condition 91 be - amended to include all uses permitted in a (B-l) District plus plumbing and heating sales, ~e_~ and repair. Also that condition #2 be ~A~ .... ~-~~ -. Outside storage of equipment, materials, supplies or items for sale. LEGEND -- -- ...... )- COUNTY"- LINE .1' - 2 ~3.3e' Aug~.~ ~ 24, 1977 (B.S.) ~/-~-~97~- ~C.~ZrC) C~SE NUMBER: 77S151 ~PPLICANT: TAYLOR-KING ENTERPRISES, INC. REQUEST &' P~ROPOSED USE: Renewal of a Conditional Use to permit the operation of a Turkey Shoot. 'GENERAL LOCATION AND TAX MAP IDENTIFICATION: In Bermuda Magisterial DistriCt, this parcel lies along the south line of Willis Road and is located approximately 150 feet east of its intersection with Southwood Road. Tax Map 82-2 (2) Gravel Pit Farms Lot 14 (Sheet 23). ACREAGEr EXISTING ZONING, EXISTING LAND USE (SUBJECT PARCEL): Approximately 2 acres in area, zoned Heavy Industrial (M-3) and occupied by a turkey shoot facility. ADJACENT AND AREA ZONING AND LAND USE: Adjacent property is zoned Heavy Industrial (M-3) and is occupied by single family dwellings or remains vacant. 'UTILITIES,''SOIL' PROFILE, DRAINAGE AND ~ROSION REQUIRED OFF-SITE EASEMENTS: This request will have no effect on utilitieS', soil, drainage and erosion, or require off-site easements. PUBLIC FACILITIES: Operation of this turkey shoot facility will require policing and traffic control as would be normally associated with such an operation. TRANSPORTATION AND TRAFFIC: Relatively heavy amounts of traffic are generated by this use during the hours of operation. Access to this site is by means of a dirt drive-way intersecting with Willis Road. GENERAL PLAN: Industrial use. REQUEST ANALYSIS: The Applicant requests renewal of a Conditional Use to permit the operation of a turkey shoot on this site. This turkey shoot has been in operation for the last 10 years. Previous approvals of this request were granted by the Board of Zoning Appeals on February 7, 1973 and February 18, 1975, and as customary in such matters, a condition restricting the Special Exception for two years from date of approval was imposed. · ~fter reviewing the operation and inspecting the site and surrounding areas, Staff is of the opinion that this continued operation will offer no detriment to either the parcel in question or a~jacent properties provided appropriate and customary conditions 'are imn°se~. ! 1 ALTERNATIVES AND MITIGATING MEASURES: Staff in its review of the current application and upon inspection of the site, is of the opinioN that the operation has not proved a detriment to the area and it is bein~~ conducted in a reasonable and orderly fashion. No complaints with reference to this use have been received by this office. Staff is of the opinion that condition ~2 which previously allowed the use for a period of only 2 years should be amended to permit validity for 5 years. All other conditions are the same as required by other similar type operations within the County and should continue to be imposed. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approval of the request is recommended subject to the implementation of the above noted conditions with condition #2 reading as follows: This permit shall be valid for a period of 5 years, subject to review by the Board upon reapplication for renewal. CASE HISTORY AND PAST COmmISSION AND BOARD ACTION FOR THIS REQUEST C.P.C. 7 19 '77: It was resolved to recommend approval of a Conditional Use to permit the operation of a Turkey Shoot subject to the following conditions: Prior to the continuance of the operation, the Planning Office shall be presented with written proof of the following: That the operator of the Turkey Shoot has obtained or is in process of applying for a business license, as specified in section 5-56 of the County Code. bo That clearance from the Chesterfield Police Department relative to section 7-11 of the County Code has been obtained. Co That the Police Department has certified that this operation will not violate State and County Weapons Discharge Ordinances as would be applicable under Section 33.1 349 Section 7-32 of the Acts of Virginia and Chesterfield County Code. A clearance from the County Health Department that the operation does not violate State Food and Drink Regulations and that proper facilities for the disposal of human waste are provided for as approved. e This permit shall be valid for a period of five years subject to review by the Board upon re-application for renewal. e 10. Hours of operation shall be restricted to between 9:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m. Monday through Thursday and between 9:00 a.m. and 11:00 p.m. on Friday and Saturday. No Sunday operation shall be permitted.. The use of firearms shall be limited to shot guns only. Alcoholic beverages shall be prohibited. Ail parking areas and driveways shall be adequately graded and either paved or re-graveled (it is noted that the existing entrance and drive is in poor condition) prior to the continuance of this operation. Parking spaces shall be provided at a ratio of one space for every two participants. Each space shall be 10 ft. x 20 ft. in size. Ail driveways and entrances shall be at least 25 ft. in width. Any and all abandoned automobiles parts thereof and other debris shall be removed from the premises prior to the continuance of this operation. '-3 -I 'FLOOP REYNOLDS ALUMINUM MILL PRODUCTS DIVISION August 3, 1977 Mr. Garland E. Dodd Supervisor, Bermuda District Chesterfield County~ Vzrginia Dear Mr. Dodd: In reference to our recent conversation and in an effort to promote better communications between our local government and our industrial community~ Reynolds Metals Company hereby extends to the Board of Supervisors an invitation to visit our facilities in Chesterfield. We can arrange a tour in each of our plants on any date the entire Board can mutually agree upon. We may suggest any Monday through Friday during the month of September to avoid the busy vacation season. We may also suggest the tours begin approximately at 10:00 a.m., have lunch with us~ and continue there- after depending on your schedule. We feel we can make your visit pleasant as well as infor- mative and you will get an o~portunity to meet our management teams and the citizens of Chesterfield and the surrounding area that produce our varied aluminum products. We are looking forward to your visit and, if you have any questions regarding times~ dates, etCo~ please contact the undersigned. Very truly yours, REYNOLDS METALS COMPANY W. K. Singleton Government Affairs Representative cc: Walt Amaker - EXO J. J. Tosh - Printing H. I. Coggins - Smelting R. D. Crocker - Plant 44 REYNOLDS METALS COMPANY BELLWOOD EXTRUSION PLANT 1901 REYMET ROAD - RICHMOND, VIRGINIA 23234 703/275-6441 CHEST ERFIELD COUNTY BOARD Of SUPERVISORS MEETING DATE: August 24, 1977 AGENDA ITEM NUMBER: 14 SUBJECT: - PUBLIC HEARING ON ORDINANCE RELATING TO RESPONSIBLE PARTIES FOR SEWER AND WATER CHARGES AND LIENS ON REAL ESTATE FOR UNPAID WATER CHARGES COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S RECOMMENDATION OR COMMENTS: - SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: - This date was set for a public hearing on the attached ordinance. ATTACHMENTS:- ~YES r']NO 14. AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE CODE OF ,THE COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD, 1975, AS AMENDED, BY AMEND~ ING SECTION 20-22 AND ADDING SECTIONS 20-13.1 AND 20-13.2 RELATING TO RESPONSIBLE PARTIES FOR SEWER AND WATER CHARGES AND LIENS ON REAL ESTATE FOR UNPAID WATER CHARGES BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County: (1) That SeCtion 20-22 of the Code of the County of Chesterfield, 1975, 'as amended, is amended and reenacted as follows: Sec. 20'22. ' Ch~ar~es· 'for sewer service' a lien on real estate s e rved. The charges made for sewer service, pursuant to this article, if unpaid shall be a lien on the real estate served by such sewer a~-~he-~w~e~-~-~h provided~~ hOweVer,· that the tenant or residen~t~ o~f such premises shall be liable for the payment of such charges. If the ~w~e~ tenant· or resident of such property fails to pay the charges made for sewer service, they shall be collected by the treasurer of the county in the same manner as taxes and leVies are colleCted. (2) That Sections 20-13.1 and 20-13.2 are added to the Code of the County of Chesterfield, 1975, as amended, as follows: Se'c.~ '20-13. 1~.' 'Charges for water service a lien on real estate s e rye d. The 'cha'rges made for wate'r 'service, pursuant to this article, if unpaid 'shall be a lien on the' ~eal estate~ served by such water,' Provided, however, that the tenant~ or resident of such premises' 'shall be liable fo'r the paymen~t· of such charges. If the 'tenant' or resident~ o'f such.property fails to pay the cha~.es made for water Service, they shall be~ collected by the 'trea~surer Of the ~county 'in the' same manner as taxes and levies 'ar ~' 'co 1 le cte d. SeC. ~20-13.2'. · Delinquent water taxes or charges to be docketed. · If 'any t~aXe's or 'charges made ~for water o~r the use thereof in th~'~' county remain unpaid for a period o~f sixty days then the ~ilities' department shall certify such' ~taxes or charges to the 'treasurer of the coun'ty who shall collect such amount. The t~reas'Urer shall' ~ce~rtify such t'axes' o'r ~charges as being unpaid to the 'clerk of the ~Clrcuit' ~co~urt' who shall 'docket 'the same in the delinquent tax books in his office. WILLIAM U. SAVAGE IRVIN G. HORNER JAMES H. NEWELL SALES HOMES FARMS TIMBER PROPERTY MANAGEMENT HORNER and NEWELL RE~ILTORS P. O. BOX 8908 3707 HULL STREET RICHMOND, VA. 23225 PHONE BE 3-7641 INSURANCE FIRE AUTOMOBILE CASUALTY LIFE MORTGAGE August 23, 1977 Board of Supervisors Chesterfield Co. Chesterfield, VA 23832 Gentlemen: This refers to the ordinance which you passed in February 1976 regarding owners of property being responsible for water bills incurred by tenants. We represent the owners of approximately 40 pieces of real estate in Chesterfield County and speaking for them urge that you repeal this unfair and unjust ordinance. Sincerely, W. U. Savage Vice President WUS/dp MEETING DATE: CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD Of SUPERVISORS August 24, 1977 AGENDA ITEM NUMBER: 16. A&B SUBJECT: - PUBLIC HEARINGS A. Ordinance Relating to Building Permits for Mobile Homes B. Ordinance Relating to Location of Mobile Homes in Residential, Commercial and Industrial Zones and Requirements for Such Location COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S RECOMMENDATION OR COMMENTS: - SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: - This date was set for a public hearing on the attached ordinances. ATTACHMENTS:- BYES r'aNO BOARD OF 5UPERVI$ORS E, MERLIN O NEILL CHAIRMAN JOAN GIRONE V~CE CHAIRMAN MIDLOTHIAN DISTR~CT C. L. BOOKMAN CLOVER HILL DISTRICT J, RUFFIN APPERSON GARLAND DOOD COUNTY Al)MINISTRATION C G N4ANUEL Of CHESTERFIELD CHESTERFIELD, VIRGINIA 23832 MEMORANDUM May 10, 1977 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: Members of the Board of Supervisors Steven L. Micas, County Attorney ~A Report of the Mobile Home Committee Attached for your review are the proposed recommendations of the Mobile Home Committee to amend the County Code and Zoning Ordinance to accomplish the following changes: Prohibit all future parking of mobile homes in any residential district. The Board of Super- visors would continue to hear renewals of pre- viously granted permits, but if they were approved the permit would run with the applicant-owner of the mobile home for an indefinite period of time. As soon as the current holder of the mobile home permit discontinued hi'.: use of the mobile home, the permit would expire and could not be reissued to a new applicant. Applications for individual mobile homes on lots in Agricultural, Commercial and Industrial zones would be treated as special exceptions issued by the Board of Zoning Appeals. The special excep- tion would run with the applicant-owner rather than a set time period. Mobile homes in agricul- tural zones could only be used for a residence by the owner or a member of his immediate family and not for profit, while a mobile home in commercial and industrial zones could be used for either a home or a business. Members of the Board of Supervisors Page 2 May 10, 1977 The Board of Zoning Appeals could grant a special exception permitting the use of a mobile home as temporary living quarters for members of the lot owner's immediate family. The special exception could only be granted in cases of hardship and' for a period not to exceed nine months. A single mobile home permit for $20.00 would be granted by the building inspector's office. The permit would include a building, plumbing and electrical inspection. Add as an ordinance requirement the existing poli- cies that require: a. a single mobile home to be parked on an indi- vidual lot or parcel; b. compliance with minimum lot size, yard set- back, required front yard and other zoning requirements of the applicable zoning district; c. skirting of all mobile homes; and, d. compliance with the registration seal when an owner of a mobile home desires to add to his mobile home. Continuation of existing planning policies concern- ing mobile homes which will be included as conditions in future special exceptions granted by the Board of Zoning Appeals. Since all the changes, except for the change in building inspection fees, involve changes in the Zoning Ordinance, the Planning Commission must consider the changes prior to review by the Board of Supervisors. SLM/j lb MEMORANDUM TO: From: DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CHESTERFIELD COUNTY Board of Supervisors Stanley R. Balderson, Jr., Chie Division of Development Review SUBJECT: Text Amendment #22 (Mobile Homes') to'the Che'sterf~eld Coun't~''zonin~~ Ordinance.~ August 24, 1977 On May 11, 1977, Mr. Steven Micas, County Attorney, made a report to the Board of Supervisors in regard to the parking of Mobile Homes in the County. He advised that the Mobile Home Committee had made a detailed study of this subject, and had discussed changes in County Ordinances and policies designed to insure that the parking of a mobile home is compatible with other existing land use. He presented the fol- lowing recommendations for amendments to the Zoning Ordinance for the Board's review. A copy of this Ordinance is enclosed. Prohibit all future parking of mobile homes in any residential district· The Board of Supervisors would continue to hear re- newals of previously granted permits,' but if tkey were approved, the permit would run with'the ~applicant-owner of' the mobile for an indefinite period of time. As so'on as ~the ~current holder of the mobile home permit discontinued his use 'of the mobile' home, the permit would expire and could not be 'reissued to a new applicant or occupant. (Section 3-13), ~(Section 9-5). ApplicationS'for. ~ndi¥~dual ~ob~le 'k0meS on lots-in Agricultural, Commercial. and Industrial zones would be ~treated as 'special' exceptions issued by the Board of Zoning Appeals.' The'speCial exception would run with 'the applicantLoW~.er rather than a set time period· Mobile homes in agricultural zones ~ould only be used for a residence by the owner or a member of his immediate family and not for profit, while a mobile 'home 'in commercial and industrial zones 'could be used for either a home or business. (Section 15-4), .(SeCtion-17-1 (66)), (Sectio~ 17-4 (2)), (Section 21-1 (24)}, .(Section 21-4 (3)). The Board of Zoning Appeals could grant a special exception permitting the use of a mobile home as temporary living quarters for members of the lot owner's in~,ediate family. The special exception could only be granted in cases of hardship and for a.period not to exceed nine months. (Section 4-4 (i)). Add as an ordinance requirement the existing policies-that require: (section 24-13) a. a single mobile home to be parked on an individual lot or parcel; b. compliance with minimum lot size, yard setback, required front yard and other zoning requirements of the applicable zoning district; c. skirting of all mobile homes; and d. compliance with the registration seal whe~ an owner of a mobile home desires to add to his mobile home. Se Continuation of existing planning policies concerning mobile homes which will be included as conditions in future special exceptions granted by the Board of Zoning Appeals. The Board reviewed the proposed amendments to the Zoning Ordinance and referred the Zoning changes to the Commission for a Public Hearing. On June 28, 1977, the Planning Commission held a Public Hearing on the proposed amendment and resolved to recommend approval of the amendment subject to changing paragraph 4-4 (1) to read "A mobile home to be 'located for a period not to exceed twelve months ... such lots for immediate family." Attached for your information is a Mobile Home Summary Chart reflecting the number of mobile homes located in mobile 'hOme Parks and on individual lots by magisterial district. Enclosures 2. 16. A, AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND AND REENACT SECTION 6-4 OF THE CODE OF THE COUNTY OF ~HESTER- FIELD, 19 75, AS A~ENDED, RELATING TO BUILDING PERMIT FEES FOR MOBILE HOMES BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County: (~1) That Section 6-4 of the Code of the County of Chester- field is amended and reenacted as follows: ~Sec. 6-4. Permit fees. (a) Gen~erally. Unless otherwise excepted, no permit to begin work for new construction, alteration, removal, demoli- tion, or other building operation or construction required by the several provisions of the Virginia Uniform Statewide Building Code shall be issued until the fees prescribed in this section shall have been paid. No amendment to a permit neces- sitating an additional fee because of an increase in the esti- mated cost of the work involved shall be approved until the additional fee has been paid. All such permits shall be issued by the building official on forms approved and furnished by his office. The fees for permits shall be based upon the project cost in accordance with the following schedule: (1) Building: ae Basic building, including signs, two thousand dollars or less ............... $10.00 Each additional thousand ............... 2.50 b. Demolition ............................. 10.00 c. Moving or relocating buildings ......... 10.00 d. Septic tank ............................ 25.00 Mobile home, includinq building, electrical and plumbing ................ 20.00 (2) Mechanical: Heating or air conditioning, two thousand dollars or less ............... $10.00 Each additional thousand ............... 2.50 Replacement of oil or gas tanks over ten gallons ....................... 10.00 c. Replacement of hot water heater ........ 10.00 (3) Plumbing: Se Basic plumbing, four traps or less ..... $10.00 Each additional trap ................... 1.50 be Water, sewer and septic tank con- nections ............................... 10. Of) c. Wells .................................. 10.6 (4) Electrical: Basic electrical, one thousand dollars or less ................................ $10.00 Each additiOnal thousand ............... '5.00 Elevator/escalator, one thousand dol- lars or less ........................... 10.00 Each additional thousand ............... 5.00 (5) Elect'ri'cat~ and plumbing ca~ds:. a. Master card, annually .................. $ 5.00 Examination ............................ 20.00 Journeyman card, annually .............. 5.00 Examination ............................ 10.00 (b) Exemptions from fee requirement: (1) No fee shall be required for building permits for construction when the cost of such construction is less than five hundred dollars and such construction would not involve securing any other permit as required by section 113.01 of the BOCA Basic Building Code. (2) No fee shall be required to be paid for permits to be issued for the construction of buildings designed for and used to house religious assemblies as a place of worship. (c) Filing certificates of cost; adjustment of fee. Upon completion of any building or construction for which a permit is required under the provisions of the Virginia Uniform Statewide Building Code, the applicant shall file with the building offi- cial on forms furnished by him, prior to occupancy or within ninety days after completion, a certificate of actual cost of such building or construction. At the time such certificate of actual cost is filed, the amount of fee required by this section shall be adjusted to the actual cost and either an additional fee paid or a refund made. (d) Disposition of fees. All permit fees required by thisl section shall be paid by the applicant to the county treasurer or his deputy at the time the application for permit is filed with the building official, and upon receipt of such fees, the treasurer shall deposit same to the credit of the county generall fund. AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND AND REENACT ~9-5 AND 15-4 OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CODE OF THE COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD, 1975, AS AMENDED, RELATING TO MOBILE HOME PERMITS IN RESIDEN- TIAL AND AGRICULTURAL DISTRICTS BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County: (1) That ~9-5 and 15-4 of the Zoning Ordinance of the Code of the County of Chesterfield are amended and reenacted as follows: Section 9-5 Required conditions. (1) Lot area. Each dwelling, together with its accessory building, hereafter erected shall be located on a lot having an area of not less than seven thousand (7,000) square feet and a front width of not less than fifty (50) feet. (2) Percentage of lot coverage. Ail buildings, including accessory buildings, on any lot shall not cover more than thirty per cent of the area of such a lot. (3) Front yard. Each lot shall have a front yard having a depth of not less than thirty (30) feet. (.4) Side yard. Each lot shall have two side yards, each having a width of seven and one-half (7%) feet pro- vided, however, that on any lot which was under one ownership at the time of the adoption of this Ordin- ance (1945), which lot has a front width of less than fifty feet and when the owner thereof owns no adjoin- ing land, the width of each side yard may be reduced to not less than ten per cent of width of such lot, but in no event shall the width of either side yard on any be less than five feet. (5) Corner side yard. Each corner side yard shall not be less than twenty-five (25) feet, except that (a) sub- division lots recorded prior to April 1, 1974 shall observe corner side yards of fifteen (15) feet and (b) corner lots back to .back with another corner lot shall have a corner side yard not less than fifteen (15) feet. (6) Rear yard. Each lot shall have a rear yard not less than twenty-five (25) feet i.n depth. Mobile Homes prohibited except under certain conditions. After the effective date of this Ordinance (7-1-71) no premises shall be used for the location of mobile homes, provided, how- ever, that nothing herein shall prohibit those persons who have located a mobile home in an R-7 District by virtue of a permit previously granted from applying for a renewal of said permit so long as it may be granted consecutively by the Board of Zon- ing Appeals, and provided further that after the effective date of this Ordinance a mobile home permit may be granted for the original location of a mobile home in an R-7 District by the Board of Supervisors, which mobile home permit shall specify the location of such trailer on the Premises and assure compliance with health and sanitary requirements of the county. The mobile home permit shall be valid for a period not to exceed ~w~ five years. At the expiration of the time specified on the mobi-~ home permit, an application may be made for renewal of the mobile home permit. The Board of Supervisors and the Board of Zoning Appeals may take action on such applications without prior notice being published in a newspaper of the date the respective Boards will act on such application and no notice to adjoining landowners shall be required unless directed by the Board of SuperviSors or the Board of Zoning Appeals, respectively. Section 15-4 Uses allowed by Special Exception, subject to the provisions of Section 27-5. (a) Same as specified for R~40 District. (~b) Individual mobile homes for a period not to exceed ~w~ five years. At the expiration of the ~w~ five year period a new application may be made for a new Special Exception. The Board of Zoning Appeals may take action on such application without prior notice being published in a newspaper on the date the Board will act on such application and no notice to adjoin- ing landowners shall be required unless directed by the Board of Zoning Appeals. (lc) Outdoor advertising signs subject to Section 24.2-5. AN ORDIN~2{CE TO AMt~D THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CODE OF THE COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD, 1975, AS AMEI~ED, BY ADDING ~3-13 ~tND 24-13 AND AMENDING SECTIONS 4-4, 9-5, 15-4, 17-1, 17-4, 21-1 AND 21-4 RELATING GENERALLY TO LOCATION OF. MOBILE I~OHES IN RESIDENTIAL, COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL ZONES AND REQUIRE- MENTS FOR SUCH LOCATION BE IT ORDA1/~ED by the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County: (1) That the Zoning Ordinance of the Code of the County of Chesterfield, 1975, as amended, is amended by adding ~3-13 and 24-13 as follows: Section 3-13 Mobile Homes Prohibited. No lot or parcel of land located in any residential zone shall be used for the location of a mobile home, provided how- ever, that nothing herein shall prohibit those persons who have located a mobile home in an R-7 District pursuant to a permit granted prior to , 1977 from applying to the Board of Supervisors for a renewal of such permit. The Board of Supervisors shall only grant such pe~-~,~t to the existing holder of a permit and the permit shall be valid for that pe_riod of time during which the occupant continuously uses such site for his residence. At such time as the holder of the permit discontinues use of the mobile home for his residence, the per- mit shall expire and may not be renewed by the Board of Super- visors. Ail mobile home permit renewals shall specify the location of such mobile home on the premises and shall assure compliance with health and sanitary requirements of the County. The Board of Supervisors may revoke any mobile home permit for failure to comply with such health, sanitary and safety require- ments. Nothing herein shall be construed to require the cation of notice to adjoining lando%~ers or prior notice by publication in a newspaper of any hearing to consider the renewal of any mobile home permit. Section 24-13 Regulations applying to }.~bile Homes. The following conditions shall apply to all mobile homes located on individual lots in residential, commercial and industrial zones: (1) Only one mobile home shall be permitted to be parked on an individual lot or parcel. (2) The minimum lot size, ,yard setback, required front yard and other zoning requirements of the applicable zoning district shall be complied with. (3) No additional permanent type living space may be added to a mobile home unless the mobile home and addition were originally designed for that purpose as defined by the registration seal affixed to the unit. (4) Ail mobile homes shall be skirted. (2) That ~4-4, 9-5, 15-4, 17-1, 17-4, 21-1 and 21-4 of the Zoning Ordinance of the Cods of the County of Chesterfield are amended and reenacted as follows: Section 4- 4 Uses allowed by Special Exception, subject to the provisions of Section 27-5. (a) Hospitals, clinics, sanitariums, medical and dental laboratories. (b) Non-profit legal service facilities. (c) Philanthropic and charitable institutions. (d) Non-profit civic, social and fraternal clubs and lodges and recreational facilities and grounds appurtenant thereto. (e) cemeteries, crematories and other places for the dis- posal of the dead. (f) Emergency rescue squad and fire station buildings and grounds .. (g) Utility uses, including but no% limited to. solid waste disposal; communication; water utilities and irrigation; sewage disposal; electric, gas and telephone transmission and pipeline rights-of-ways; gas and pipeline pressure conkrol sta- tions; electricity regulating substations and other electric utilities. Before the Board grants such Special Exception, it shall first obtain a report from the County Planning Commission as to whether or not the facility wo~td be consistent with a comprehensive plan of development for the County or would inter- fere with any of the proposals in such plan. The County Plan- ning Commission must submit its report within sixty (60) days from the receipt of such request for a Special Exception, other- wise, it shall be deemed to have approved such application. Service lines, cables,:.-b~4e~ wires or pipes in easements on public roads, or on public roads or on the premises of indivi- dual consumers shall be permitted without obtaining a Special Exception. (h) Government buildings. (i) Greenhouses, hothouses, and plant nurseries at which the products thereof are sold or offered for sale. (j) A business operated on a lot or parcel inside or out- side of a. dwelling unit or accessory building and not a home occupation, provided the o%n~er or operator of the business resides on the premises. (k) Private schools, colleges, libraries and museums. (1) A mobile home to be located for a period' not to exceed nine months, providing the location of said mobile home is necessary because the principal residence located on the pre- raises has been rendered uninhabitable by fire or other Act of C~d or such mobile home is necessary because of hardship to provide temporary living quarters for a member of the owner of suCh lot's ~mmed~ate' family. (m) Reservea. (n) Family Day Care Momes, Child Care Centers, and Kinder- gartens. (o) Group Care Facility. (p) Landfill operations to include the dumping of stumps and processed materials (not a sanitary landfill). (q) Backyard, attic, and garage sales which exceed seven (7) days in duration. Section 9-5 Required conditions. (2) Lot area. Each dwelling, together with its accessory building, hereafter erected shall be located on a lot having an area of not less than seven thousand (7,000) square feet and a front width of not less than fifty (50) feet. Percentage of lot coverage. All buildings, including accessor~ bui'ldi~, On. ~ny lot shall not cover more than thirty per cent of the area of such a lot. (3) Front yar~. Each lot shall have a front yard having a depth of not less than thirty (30) feet. (4) Side yard. Each lot shall have two side yards, each having a width of seven and one-half (7%) feet pro- v~ded, however, that on any lot which was under one ownership at the time of the adoption of this Ordin- ance (1945), which lot has a front width of less than fifty feet and when the owner thereof owns no adjoin- ing land, the width of each side yard may be reduced to not less than ten per cent of width of such lot, but in no event shall the width of either side yard on any be less than five feet. ~ (5) Corner side yard. Each corner side yard shall not be less than twenty-five (25) feet, except that (a) sub- division lots recorded prior to April 1, 1973 shall observe corner side yards of fifteen (15) feet and (b) Corner lots back to back with another corner lot shall have a corner side yard not less than fifteen (15) feet. (6) Rear yard. Each lot shall have a rear yard not less than twenty-five (25) feet in depth. ~u=u~ou ~-q uses a~loweo Dy Special Exception, subject to the provisions-of Section 27-5. (a) ~.~ as specified for R-40 b.strict. Cb) Individual mobile homes used by the owner or a member of his imm~/iat~ famil~ as a residence and not for profit fee-e-pe~iei-ne~-~-exceed-~we-yeees. maY-~e-ma~e-~o=-e-mew-gpee~e~-Bxee~n= The Boar~ of Zoning Appeals may take action on such application without prior notice being published Xna newspaper on the date the Board will act on such application and no notice to adjoining landowners shall be required unless directed by the Board of Zoning, Appeals (c) Outdoor advertising signs subject to Section 24.2-5. Section 17-1' Uses permitted. Within any B-1 District, no'bu~lding structure, or premises shall be used or arranged or designed to be used in any part except for one or more of the following uses: (1) Any permitted use as regulated in the R-40 D%strict except dwellings; provided, however, that any dwellingS legally existing in this District at the time of adoption of the Ordin- ance of any amendment hereto shall not be subject to the re~ stricttons or non-conforming uses contained herein. (2) Antique shop (3) Appliance store (4) Art school, gallery or museum (5) Artist material and supply store (6) Bakery goods. (7) 'Bank (8) Barber Shop (9) Beauty shop (10) Bicycle sales and rental (11) Book or stationery store (~2) Brokerage (I3) ] Camera store (14) Candy store , (15) Catering establishment (16) Cleaning, pressing and laundry (17) Clothes store (18) Curio or 'gift shop (19)' Drug store (20) Dry goo~s Store '(21) Dairy products store (22) De licatessen (23) Dress shop '(24) Florist shop, greenhouse, nursery (25) Frozen food locker and sales (26) Furniture store (27) Governmental offices _ >,_.. (28) C. rocery store ~::~'..-..:'" ~':"'~.~?~:: (NX) ~ospi~aXs, r~st, nursing, convalescent ho ::-~.. ~'~-:::' ': :'.-:~.~.~-: (33) Laundromats and c . .'._:'~:"~ ;-".:'~:~." . ¢'4~1 .,..,,~ . oin operated dry cleanin · --.:~.~ ..... ica1 faciltt or (42) (43) (44) (45) (46) (47) (48) (49) (5O) .(51) Nursery Bchools, ch11~ or ~ay care centers auu ki~ergartans ' Of'~al. b~linesl and protesiW%nal Of£ac~ supply store Optometrists sales and servioes Paint and wallpaper sales Pet shopl Post .office Photography studio Pharmacy · Radio and television broadcasting studios and offices exclusivm of towers .- (52) Radio, television and other home entertainment sales (53) (54) (55) (56) (57) (58) (59') (60) (61) (62) Sewing machine sales, instruction, Specialty shops Sporting goods sales Shoe repair shop Tailoring and aressmak!ng shops Taxidermy Telephone booth':' Telephone exchanges .Toy store and servioe P~staurants,. not including drive-in establishments Savings a~ loan associations- '--- Self-servioe laundry establishments and service (65) Variety store - ( 66 ) ~ne-m~b$~e-hom~-fo=-~-ew~er-or (67) Travel arr~ging and tr~sporta~ tibet services Section 17-4' Uses all=~ed by Special Exception, s~ect to pro~ston8 of Section 27-~. (1) ~ special exCept~n allowe'~ .tn ~e R-40 District, ~less previo~ly allowe~ ~ Section 17-1. (2) Indivtaual ~bile ho~s for USe as a resiflenCe or 9~rati~ of a busineSS to be cOnducted on '~e preSSes. Section 21-1 uses ~itte~. with~ any M-1 District, no b~l~ing, structure or pre~ses -- - shall be. use~, arr~gea, or flesi~e~to be use~ in ~y part, except for one or more of the following uses= '(1) ~parel-~fl 'other finishe~ proauc~ ~e-~rom f~rics, ~ lea~er, ~ s~lar materials, except lea~er t~- · ning-~ufacturing. - .. . (2) B~e~ pro~uc~-~uf~cturing. . "' ~ (3) Bottling ~ ca~ing ioft flrinks ~d carbonatefl water. .. .:;~ . - ~ . (4) Br~ ~d brushea-~ufacturing,. . . . : .~ · ~u~cs ~ toiletries (coloring only)-~nufac- turing, (12) (13) (15) (16) (17) (18) (19) (20) (21) (22) (23) (24) Costume Jewelry, costume. ce~aneous notions (except precious metals)-manufac- t% ng. Electric lighting and wiring ~quipment, communication equipment (including radio and TV), and electronic components and accessories-manufacturing. Fabricating sheet metal products. Freight forwarding, packaging, and crating services, not including truck terminals. Fur dressing and dyeing. Industrial and vocational training schools. Jewelry, silverware, plated ware-manufacturing. Laboratories and other research and development facil- ities. Lamp shades-manufacturing. Linoleum, asphalt-felt-base, and other hard surface floor and cover-manufacturing. Mortici~n' s goods-manufacturing. Motion picture production. Musical instruments and parts-manufacturing. Pens, pencils, and other office anO artist's materials- manufacturing. (26) (27) (28) (29) (30) (31) (32) (33) (34) (35) (36) (37) Pharmaceutical products-manufacturing. ~rinting, publishing, and allie~ industries.-' Professional offices. Professional, scientific, and controlling instruments; photographic and optical goods; watches and clo-=ks- manufacturing. Rectifying and blending liquors. RoaSting coffee and coffee pro~.ucts and tea-manufac- turing. Spices, flavor extracts, and flavor syrups-manufac- turing. Toys, amusement, sporting, and athletic goods-manu- facturing. Umbrellas, parasols, and canes-manufacturing. Warehouses. ~'~olesaling houses and distributors. Wina, brandy, and brandy spirits-manufacturing. Miscellaneous plastic products-manufacturing. Section 21-4 Uses allowed by Special Exception, subject to the provisions of Sectioh 27"5. '- ' ' (1) Any special exception allowed in the B-3 District. (2) Outdoor advertising signs. (3) Individual mobile homes for use as a residence or operation of a business to be 'conducted on the premises.