11-21-2000 MinutesBOARD OF SUPERVISORS
MINUTES
November 21, 2000
Supervisors in Attendance:
Mr. Arthur S. Warren, Chairman
Mrs. Renny B. Humphrey, Vice Chrm.
Mr. Edward B. Barber
Mr. J. L. McHale, III
Mr. Kelly E. Miller
Mr. Lane B. Ramsey
County Administrator
O0-750
Staff in Attendance:
Colonel Carl R. Baker,
Police Department
Mr. George Braunstein,
Dir., Community Services
Board
Mr. Craig Bryant, Dir.,
Utilities
Mr N. E. Carmichael,
Commissioner of Revenue
Ms Marilyn Cole, Asst.
County Administrator
Ms Mary Ann Curtin, Dir.,
Intergovtl. Relations
Ms Rebecca Dickson, Dir.,
Budget and Management
Mr William D. Dupler,
Building Official
Ms Lisa Elko,
Clerk
Chief Stephen A. Elswick,
Fire Department
Mr. Michael Golden, Dir.,
Parks and Recreation
Mr. Bradford S. Hammer,
Deputy Co. Admin.,
Human Services
Mr. John W. Harmon,
Right-of-Way Manager
Mr. Russell Harris,
County Ombudsman
Mr. Thomas E. Jacobson,
Dir., Planning
Mr. Donald Kappel, Dir.,
Public Affairs
Ms. Kathryn Kitchen, Asst.
Supt. of Schools for
Business and Finance
Mr Louis Lassiter, Dir.,
Internal Audit
Ms Mary Lou Lyle,
Dir., Accounting
Ms Faith McClintic, Asst.
Dir., Economic Development
Mr R. John McCracken,
Dir., Transportation
Mr Richard M. McElfish,
Dir., Env. Engineering
Mr Steven L. Micas,
County Attorney
Mr Francis Pitaro, Dir.,
General Services
Mr James J. L. Stegmaier,
Deputy Co. Admin.,
Management Services
ll/21/O0
Mr. M. D. Stith, Jr.,
Deputy Co. Admin.,
Communit
Mr. Thoms
Block G~
Mr. Warren called the regularly scheduled ms
4:03 p.m.
1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES FOR NO%EMBER 8, 200C
On motion of Mrs. Humphrey, seconded by Mr.
approved the minutes of November 8, 2000, a
Ayes: Warren, Humphrey, Barber, McHale and
Nays: None.
o
y Development
s A. Taylor, Dir.,
ant Office
eting to order at
~cHale, the Board
submitted.
iller.
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS
Mr. Ramsey stated that the Virgin/
Transportation (VDOT) awarded a $47 mill
week for the completion of Route 288
County line. He further stated the
announced that they intend to negotia~
proposer for the balance of the Route 28
Pcwhatan line to Interstate 64 as afc
facility, with an anticipated completion
indicated that this is very good news
Ccunty.
Mr. Ramsey stated that the Budget and Alldit Committee met
earlier today with representatives fr¢~m KPMG, LLP, the
Ccunty's independent auditors, to review the FY00
Ccmprehensive Annual Financial Report. He further stated
that each Board member has been presented a copy of the
Report. He then introduced Ms. Elizabel~h Foster, partner
with KPMG, LLP.
Ms. Foster stated that the audit is
received unqualified opinions, which is
opinion that can be received. She fu
KPMG, LLP audited the financial statem~
funds and account groups of the Count
system and also, in separate audit rep
Greater Richmond Convention Center A
activity funds of the School System.
KPMG, LLP provided a management lett~
items of interest to staff, and note
responded fully and KPMG agrees with
She further stated that the firm also
federal funds received by the County and found no
a Department of
.ion contract last
to the Powhatan
t VDOT has also
~e with a private
project from the
ir-lane toll-free
date of 2003. He
for Chesterfield
complete and it
the best possible
rther stated that
,nts of all of the
y and the School
orts, audited the
uthority and the
She stated that
~r discussing two
d that staff has
staff's response.
.udited all of the
qualifications related to that audit
appreciation for the cooperation of C
greatly assisted in KPMG's first yea~
County.
Mr. Ramsey commended Ms. Lyle and member
expressed appreciation for their
preparation for the audit.
00-751
. She expressed
Dunty staff which
of auditing the
of her staff and
efforts towards
11/21/00
3. BOA/~D COMMITTEE REPORTS
Mr. McHale stated that he represented the Board at the Veterans
Day ceremony on November 11, 2000 where the first phase of the
Veterans Memorial Wall was dedicated.
REQUESTS TO POSTPONE ACTION, ADDITIONS, OR CHANGES IN THE
ORDER OF PRESENTATION
On motion of Mr. McHale, seconded by Mr. Warren, the Board
replaced Item 8.B.2.b., Resolution Confirming Proceedings of
the Chesterfield Industrial Development Authority Which Has
Received a Request on Behalf of Grafton Schools, Incorporated,
Requesting that the Authority Concur in the Resolution Adopted
by the Issuer, the Industrial Development Authority of Clarke
County, Virginia, on October 30, 2000; replaced Item 8.B.2.c.,
Resolution Confirming Proceedings of the Chesterfield
Industrial Development Authority for Financing of Industrial
Revenue Bonds for Bon £ecours Health Systems; replaced Item
8.B.2.d., Resolution Approving the Participation of
Chesterfield County in the Statewide Mutual Aid Agreement;
added Item 8.B.9., Conveyance of Easement to Virginia Electric
and Power Company to Install Power Lines to Provide Service to
the New Police and Fire Training Facility; added Item 8.B.10.,
Request for Permission to Stage a Fireworks Display on the
James River Near Dutch Gap; and adopted the Agenda, as amended.
Ayes: Warren, Humphrey, Barber, McHate and Miller.
Nays: None.
5. RESOLUTIONS AND SPECIAL RECOGNITIONS
There were no resolutions or special recognitions at this time.
6. WORK SESSIONS
o TAX STRUCTURE COMMITTEE REPORT
Mr. Ramsey stated that, in January 2000, the Board appointed a
Tax Structure Committee to evaluate the County's tax structure
and recommend a stable, equitable and fair tax structure
consistent with the County's economic development priorities.
He introduced Mr. Gary Thomson, Chairman of the Tax Structure
Committee, to present the Committee's Final Report to the
Board.
Mr. Thomson recognized and expressed appreciation for the
efforts of the committee members and also expressed
appreciatien te Hs. Dickson and Hs. Sheila Hinor, Revenue
Analyst for their invaluable assistance. He stated that the
everall strategy behind the Cemmittee's recommendations is to
make the Ceunty's tax structure a medel of fairness, diversity
and censistency. He reviewed Recemmendation One -- reduce and
then eliminate the Business, Prefessional and Occupatienal
License Tax (BPOL), and stated that repeal ef the BPOL tax
would eventually result in the eliminatien ef $16.5 millien in
revenue per year. He further shared that the Cemmittee also
recommends that new BPOL tax rate classificatiens be
immediately implemented fer certain types ef businesses. He
reviewed Recemmendation Two -- ebtain authority from the General
Assembly to increase lecai eption sales taxes by one-percent
00-752
for the Richmond region,
approximately $25 million in revenue an~
Chesterfield County would receive $12.5 mil
stated that the Committee recommends that ad(
revenue be allocated to capital improvemen~
would have been issued. He reviewed Recom
increasing the motor vehicle decal fee by $5
and stated that this would produce
~ually, of which
lion. He further
~itional sales tax
~s for which debt
nendation Three --
to compensate for
the reduction in revenue from other tax cate!~ories, and stated
that this would generate between $0.8 a~d $1.25 million
annually. He reviewed Recommendation Four --
of fees for emergency medical services {EMS
this would increase revenue by approxima'
annually which would be used to generally
medical services. He then reviewed Recon
reduce real estate taxes by implementing
stated that staff estimates that a four perce
generate approximately $9.6 million annuallf. He noted that
the Committee supports implementing a meals t~x only as a means
for reduction of the real estate tax rate.
There was brief discussion relative to refe
taxes recently held within various localitie:
also to the County's referendum in 1988 fc
support school construction.
Mr. Barber requested that the Board be pro
relative to what was tied to the referendum
which failed in the various State localitie~
Mr. Thomson reviewed Recommendation Six - req
a portion of the State income tax to
alternatively, request that the State
underfunded State mandates in Mental He~
Education. He encouraged the Board to cont
full funding of State mandates. Hz
Recommendation Seven -- request State legislat
definition of manufacturers for business lic
property taxation.
There was brief discussion relative to the
impact to the County of the clarification of
manufacturers.
Mr. Barber questioned the possibilit~
Recommendation Seven in the 2001 Legislativ6
Mr. Carmichael stated that it is not possibl~
potential revenue impact at this time.
Mr. Ramsey stated that the majority of the m~
tax revenue comes from large industry in thc
than ten percent comes from the area that mi(
a clarification in the definition of manufa¢
There was brief discussion relative to addir
State legislation to clarify the definition
for business license and personal property ta
Legislative Program.
Mr. Carmichael stated that he feels it would
the request to the Legislative Program and
Commissioners of Revenue Association of Virc
such a legislative request.
00-753
~upport collection
, and stated that
ely $3.6 million
benefit emergency
mendation Five --
~ meals tax, and
~t meals tax would
rendums for meals
~ in the State and
r a meals tax to
vided information
s for meals taxes
lest the return of
Chesterfield; or
fund currently
~lth, Health and
inue to press for
then reviewed
ion clarifying the
ense and personal
potential fiscal
the definition of
of including
Program.
to determine the
chinery and tools
County, and less
'ht be affected by
turers.
.g the request for
of manufacturers
xation to the 2001
be prudent to add
.ndicated that the
[nia would support
11/21/00
Mr. Warren requested that the recommendation be added to the
2001 Legislative Program.
Mr. Thomson reviewed Recon~endation Eight -- consolidate
functions performed by both County Government and County
Schools, and Recommendation Nine - study the privatization of
current County services. He reviewed areas of potential
privatization including solid waste/recycling collections/leaf
collection; ambulance/EMS services; school bus operation; print
shop; and information technology support.
Mr. Warren indicated that he supports privatization of leaf
collection.
Mr. Thomson reviewed Recommendation Ten -- establish a committee
to study impact fees, proffers and recordation taxes.
When asked, Mr. Thomson stated that the Committee felt the
variations in the amount of cash proffers offered and accepted
was an issue that needed to be studied, and that a clear
process for cash proffers should be implemented.
Mr. Warren stated that the County is exploring the possibility
of impact fees as an alternative to cash proffers.
Mr. Thomson then reviewed Recommendation Eleven -- collect sales
and use taxes due but not paid to the County. He encouraged
the Board to continue to support staff's efforts to identify
and resolve the reporting of sales at the point of sale.
Mr. Miller stated that the recommendations all appear to be for
finding revenue sources and questioned whether or not the
Committee explored expenditures.
Mr. Thomson stated that the Committee reviewed expenditure
trends and examined some specific expenditure areas, but
indicated that its task was primarily limited to the tax
structure of the County.
Mr. McHale stated that he feels the Board should take action as
soon as possible on the recommendation to clarify the
definition of manufacturers for business license and personal
property taxation. He further stated that he feels the issues
of consolidating functions performed by both County Government
and County Schools and privatization of current County services
should be revisited by the Board.
Mr. Warren stated that he feels each of the Committee's
recommendations should be considered individually and
encouraged Hr. Ramsey and County staff to bring forward
specific recommendations as a result ef the Committee's report,
particularly as they relate te the budget. He further stated
that Board members can request that individual recommendations
of the Committee be added for the Beard's agenda as either work
sessions or agenda items.
Hrs. Humphrey suggested, and it was generally agreed that Mr.
Ramsey would direct appropriate staff to prepare a response to
each of the Committee's recommendations.
Mr. HcHale suggested that the Board take a phased approach and
respond quickly te the recommendations that can be responded te
sooner than ethers.
00-754
Mr. Miller expressed concerns relative to n%w taxes and urged
the Board to act cautiously and take as muctl' time as possible
to consider the Tax Structure Committee's r~commendations.
Mr. Warren expressed appreciation to Mr.
leadership and to the members of the Tax St
for their efforts. He requested that Mr.
report to the Board in January or February
progress in responding to the ComMittee's r
7. DEFERRED ITEMS
There were no deferred items at this time.
8. NEW BUSINESS
8.A. ADOPTION OF 2001 LEGISLATIVE PROGRAM
Ms. Curtin briefly reviewed changes reque~
members to the proposed 2001 Legislative Pr<
After brief discussion, the Board added a
County's Legislative Program supporting
definition of manufacturers for business ii{
property taxation.
When asked, Ms. Curtin stated that she feel
proposal to cap cash proffers, but at a leve
harm to Chesterfield County.
Mrs. Humphrey requested that the Board be ko'
status of all legislative proposals relativ
proffers.
Mr. Miller expressed concerns relative t
enforcement of the primary seatbelt law and s
not feel this would be in the best interest o
Mr. Miller then made a motion for the Boz
support request of enforcement of the primal
When asked, Ms. Curtin stated that Colonel
that the support request be included in the
Program.
Due to the lack of a second, Mr. Miller wit~
Mr. Miller then expressed concerns relative t
authority to zoning inspectors and stated tha
the granting of such power is warranted.
that he feels this legislative request w~
County's other legislative requests and sug
eliminated from the County's Legislative Pr(
Mrs. Humphrey indicated that she support~
request.
Mr. Warren stated that, although he recogni
the summons process for zoning violations,
eliminating the request from the Legislativ(
00-755
Thomson for his
:ructure Committee
Ramsey provide a
001 as to staff's
commendations.
~ted by the Board
~gram.
~pport item to the
a study of the
~ense and personal
s there will be a
that will not do
t informed of the
e to capping cash
o supporting the
tated that he does
f County citizens.
~rd to delete the
?y seatbelt law.
Baker recommended
2001 Legislative
~drew his motion.
granting summons
he does not feel
He further stated
.11 discredit the
gested that it be
~gram.
eliminating the
zes problems with
he will support
Program.
ii/2i/O0
Mr. Barber stated that he feels strongly that the process for
correcting zoning violations could be streamlined. He further
stated that the Board has a responsibility to its citizens,
that he feels the request should remain a part of the County's
Legislative Program, and the legislative delegation should make
the determination as to whether or not to bring the request
forward.
Mr. McHale stated that he feels action should be taken relative
to the issue of correcting zoning violations in a more timely
manner and indicated that he feels zoning inspectors should be
empowered to issue summons for zoning violations. He further
stated that he feels there should be tools at the County's
disposal to allow us to be proactive and appropriately
aggressive in solving zoning violations issues. He stated that
he feels trained professional zoning inspectors can address
zoning violations just as well as uniformed police officers and
indicated that he supports the legislative request to grant
summons authority to zoning inspectors remaining a part of the
County's 2001 Legislative Program.
Mrs. Humphrey stated that she feels the item is not yet in a
format to be sent to the legislative delegation and indicated
that she supports eliminating it from the Legislative Program.
Mr. Barber stated that, because of repeated citizen inquiries,
the Board has supported the concept of granting summons
authority to zoning inspectors as a legislative request several
times in past years.
Mr. Ramsey stated that, even though the request was a part of
the County's Legislative Program, it was never introduced by a
member of the legislative delegation.
Mr. Warren stated that he still feels the request should be
eliminated from the Legislative Program at this time. He
further stated that he feels staff should review the process
for correcting zoning violations.
When asked, Ms. Curtin stated that the process for correcting
of zoning violations is handled differently in various
localities.
Mr. Warren suggested that staff explore ways in which other
localities deal with the issue.
On motion of Mrs. Humphrey, seconded by Mr. Barber, the Board
adopted the 2001 Legislative Program, as amended.
Ayes: Warren, Humphrey, Barber, McHate and Miller.
Nays: None.
8.B. CONSENT ITEMS
8.B.1. STATE ROAD ACCEPTANCE
On motion of Mr. McHale, seconded by Mr. Miller, the Board
adopted the following resolution:
WHEREAS, the streets described below are shown on plats
recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of
Chesterfield County; and
ll/2i/O0
00-756
WHEREAS, the Resident Engineer for the
of Transportation has advised this Board th(
requirements established by the Subdivision
of the Virginia Department of Transportatioi
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that tP
the Virginia Department of Transportation t
described below to the secondary system o
pursuant to ~ 33.1-229, Code of Virqinia, an
Subdivision Street Requirements.
AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that this
clear and unrestricted right-of-way, as
necessary easements for cuts, fills and dra
AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that a cert
resolution be forwarded to the Resident
Virginia Department of Transportation.
Type ChanRe to the Secondary System of State Hi.qhways: Addition
Basis for Change: Addition, Access (Local Government Facility §33.1-2
Statutory Reference: §33.1-229
Project: Government Center Parkway
· Government Center Parkway, State Route Number: 4796
From: Lucy Corr BI., (Rt. 4795) [Formally Lucy Corr Ct.]
To: Courthouse Rd. Extended, (Rt. 2099), a distance of: 0.29 miles.
Right-of-way record was filed on 4/19/1999 with the Office Of Clerk To Circuit Court in D
with a width of 120 Ft.
And, further, the Board adopted the followi~
WHEREAS, the streets described below a
recorded in the Clerk's Office of the
Chesterfield County; and
WHEREAS, the Resident Engineer for the V
of Transportation has advised this Board th(
requirements established by the Subdivision S
of the Virginia Department of Transportatio~
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that th
the Virginia Department of Transportation t
described below to the secondary system o
pursuant to ~ 33.1-229, Code of Virginia, an.
Subdivision Street Requirements.
AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that this
clear and unrestricted right-of-way, as d~
necessary easements for cuts, fills and dra
AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that a cert
resolution be forwarded to the Resident
Virginia Department of Transportation.
Type Chan.qe to the Secondary System of State Hi.qhways:
Basis for Change: Addition, New subdivision street
Statutory Reference: §33.1-229
Project:
From:
To:
Seaview @ The Highlands, Sec. 2
Rollingmist Lane, State Route Number: 5291
Seaview Dr., (Rt. 5166)
Shellharbor Ct., (Rt. 5171), a distance of: 0.11 miles.
Addition
00-757
irginia Department
streets meet the
~reet Requirements
is Board requests
o add the streets
state highways,
the Department's
3oard guarantees a
~scribed, and any
_nage.
ified copy of this
Engineer for the
29)
3546; Pg. 241,
lg resolution:
re shown on plats
Sircuit Court of
irginia Department
streets meet the
:feet Requirements
is Board requests
o add the streets
state highways,
the Department's
oard guarantees a
~scribed, and any
_nage.
ified copy of this
Engineer for the
li/~l/O0
Right-of-way record was filed on 9/1811998 with the Office Of Clerk To Circuit Court in Pb. 100, Pg. 53,
with a width of 60 Ft.
· Seaview Court, State Route Number: 5290
From: Seaview Dr., (Rt. 5166)
To; Cul-de-sac, a distance of: 0.09 miles.
Right-of-way record was filed on 9/18/1998 with the Office Of Clerk To Circuit Court in Pb. 100, Pg. 53,
with a width of 50 Ft.
· Seaview Drive, State Route Number: 5166
From: Existing Seaview Dr., (Rt. 5166)
To: Rollingmist Ln., (Rt. 5291), a distance of: 0.22 miles.
Right-of-way record was filed on 9/18/1998 with the Office Of Clerk To Circuit Court in Pb. 100, Pg. 53,
with a width of 50 Ft.
· Seaview Drive, State Route Number: 5166
From: Rollingmist Ln., (Rt. 5291)
To: Cul-de-sac, a distance of: 0.19 miles.
Right-of-way record was filed on 9/18/1998 with the Office Of Clerk To Circuit Court in Pb. 100, Pg. 53,
with a width of 50 Ft.
Ayes: Warren, Humphrey, Barber, McHale and Hiller.
Nays: None.
8.B.2. ADOPTION OF RESOLUTIONS
8 .B.2 .a.
RECOGNIZING MS. PEGGY T. SHOOSMITH, EMERGENCY
COMMUNICATIONS CENTER, UPON HER RETIREMENT
On motion of Mr. McHale, seconded by Mr. Miller, the Board
adopted the following resolution:
WHEREAS, Ms. Peggy T. Shoosmith began her public service
with the County as a Fire Dispatcher with the Fire Department
on July 23, 1984, and has faithfully served Chesterfield County
for sixteen years until September 1, 2000; and
WHEREAS, Ms. Shoosmith grew with the County and Emergency
Communications Center and demonstrated an ability to adapt to
technological change as she went from a period of working
without 9-1-1 and working with an antiquated radio system to
the current period of operating with a state of the art E-9-1-1
system and Trunked Radio System; and
WHEREAS, Ms. Shoosmith displayed a helpful, courteous and
caring attitude while working with internal and external
customers; and
WHEREAS, Ms. Shoosmith has provided a high level of
commitment to her work performance by being a thorough and
conscientious employee; and
WHEREAS, Ms. Shoosmith has provided the Emergency
Communications Center and Chesterfield County with many years
of loyal and dedicated service; and
WHEREAS, Chesterfield County and the Board of Supervisors
will miss Ms. Shoosmith's diligent service.
ii/2i/O0
00-758
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that
County Board of Supervisors recognizes Ms. P
and extends on behalf of its members am
Chesterfield County their appreciation for
County, their congratulations upon her ret
best wishes for a long and happy retirement
Ayes: Warren, Humphrey, Barber, McHale and
Nays: None.
8.B.2 .b.
the Chesterfield
eggy T. Shoosmith,
the citizens of
~er service te the
rement, and their
Iiller.
CONFIRMING PROCEEDINGS OF THE CHESTERFIELD
INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY l~ICH HAS RECEIVED
A REQUEST ON BEHALF OF GRAFTON SC]
INCORPORATED, REQUESTING THAT THE
IN THE RESOLUTION ADOPTED BY THE
INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
VIRGINIA, ON OCTOBER 30, 2000
On motion of Mr. McHale, seconded by Mr.
adopted the following resolution:
WHEREAS, the Industrial Development
County of Chesterfield (the "Authority") h
application of Grafton School, Inc., a V
nonprofit corporation (the "Applicant"), incl
adopted on October 30, 2000 (the "Inducemenl
the Industrial Development Authority of Clark
(the "Issuer"), relating to the issuance
education facilities revenue bonds in an amc
$13,425,000 (the "Bonds") to assist in
refinancing of one or more of the followinc
(collectively, the "Projects"):
(i) acquisition, construction a
approximately 32,000 square foot buildin
4100 Price Club Boulevard in Chef
Virginia, to be used by the Applicant as
and academic center;
(ii) construction of an app~
dormitory and a gymnasium, renovatio
dormitory for classroom, therapy
purposes and related improvements and
such improvements on the Applicant's
Grafton Way in Berryville in Clarke Col
(iii) acquisition and renovation o
35,866 square foot building located at 1
in the City of Winchester, Virginia,
Applicant for offices, adult services,
and maintenance facilities;
(iv) refunding of indebtedness
acquisition of the Applicant's group
County and Frederick County, Virgin
acquisition and improvement of the Appli
described in item (i) above,
and has held a public hearing thereon on Nove
WHEREAS, the Authority has recommended
Supervisors of Chesterfield County.. Virgin
00-759
tOOLS,
AUTHORITY CONCUR
CSSUER, THE
)F CLA1REi~ COUNTY,
Hiller, the Board
Authority of the
as considered the
!rginia nonstock,
uding a resolution
' Resolution"), by
e County, Virginia
of the Issuer's
}unt not to exceed
the financing or
capital projects
d equipping of an
g to be located at
.terfield County,
an administrative
'oximately 75-bed
3 of an existing
id administrative
the equipping of
ain campus at 180
lnty, Virginia;
f an approximately
20 Bellview Avenue
~o be used by the
~nd administrative
incurred for the
homes in Clarke
· a, and for the
cant's main campus
mber 16, 2000; and
that the Board of
ia (the "Board"),
concur in the Inducement Resolution for the issuance of the
Bonds by the Issuer to comply with Section 147(f) of the
Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Tax Code"), and
Section 15.2-4906 of the Code of Virginia (1950), as amended
the "Virginia Code"); and
WHEREAS, a copy of the Authority's resolution concurring
in the issuance of the Bonds to assist with the financing of
the Projects, a copy of the Inducement Resolution, a record of
the public hearing and a "fiscal impact statement" with respect
to that portion of the Projects located in Chesterfield County
have been filed with the Board.
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CHESTERFIELD
COUNTY, VIRGINIA:
1. The Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County,
Virginia, concurs in the Inducement Resolution for the issuance
of the Bonds by the Issuer for the benefit of the Applicant, to
the extent required by the Tax Code and the Virginia Code, to
permit the Issuer to assist in the financing of that portion of
the Projects located in Chesterfield County.
2. The Board's concurrence in the Inducement Resolution
for the issuance of the Bonds, as required by the Tax Code and
the Virginia Code, does not constitute an endorsement of the
Bonds or the creditworthiness of the Applicant.
3. This resolution shall take effect immediately upon its
adoption.
Ayes: Warren, Humphrey, Barber, McHale and Miller.
Nays: None.
8.B.2.d. APPROVING THE PARTICIPATION OF CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
IN THE STATEWIDE MUTUAL AID AGREEMENT
On motion of Mr. McHale, seconded by Mr. Miller, the Board
adopted the following resolution:
WHEREAS, disasters may occur in Chesterfield County and in
any jurisdiction in the state, that stress the resources of
that jurisdiction; and
WHEREAS, the Statewide Mutual Aid Program was developed to
assist cities and counties to exchange emergency response and
recovery services and resources, especially in response to a
major disaster; and
WHEREAS, the Statewide Mutual Aid Program provides for a
two-party mutual aid agreement or contract that can be
consummated quickly, provides form and structure, setting forth
the common procedures and expectations for implementation,
solves potential problems and concerns related to liability,
insurance, and reimbursement up-front; and
WHEREAS, the Statewide Mutual Aid Program makes available
the services of all local government officials, including fire,
police and rescue and provides procedures to assure in advance,
that each deployment is needed and will be cost-effective; and
WHEREAS, the Statewide Mutual Aid Program establishes
simple procedures to assure proper reimbursement and that the
ii/2i/O0
00-760
necessary records are maintained for auditin,
maximizing the reimbursement to localiti
related costs from federal and/or state gov~
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, th~
Supervisors approves the participation of CT
in the Statewide Mutual Aid Agreement.
AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that
resolution and its attachment be permanently
papers of the Board of Supervisors of Ch(
Virginia.
Ayes: Warren, Humphrey, Barber, McHale and
Nays: None.
8 .B.2 .e.
RECOGNIZING MRS. PEARL M. PERKINS
SYSTEMS TECHNOLOGY, UPON HER RETI]
On motion of Mr. McHale, seconded by Mr.
adopted the following resolution:
WHEREAS, Mrs. Pearl M. Perkins retired c
from the Information Systems Technology Depa
WHEREAS, Mrs. Perkins has provided 22
service to the citizens of Chesterfield Cour
WHEREAS, Mrs. Perkins performed ad
accounting functions for the General Services
she always demonstrated a positive and profE
and
WHEREAS, Mrs. Perkins, as Communic~
Specialist, demonstrated exceptional commun
providing quality telephone services; and
WHEREAS, Mrs. Perkins has been formally
external and internal customer service skills
excellence; and
WHEREAS, Mrs. Perkins' active particips
service activities, in particular, the
purposes and for
s of deployment
~rnment sources.
~t the Board of
Lesterfield County
a copy of this
uecorded among the
sterfield County,
[iller.
INFORMATION
.'~.MENT
4iller, the Board
October 5, 2000,
.rtment; and
years of quality
.ty; and
ministrative and
Department, where
ssional attitude;
tions Electronic
ication skills in
/ecognized for her
and commitment to
tion in community
Christmas Mother
Program, exhibited thoughtful concern for hey fellow citizens;
and ly
WHEREAS, Mrs. Perkins has been ve supportive in
volunteering her services to the Voter Registrar's Office over
the last decade; and
WHEREAS, Mrs. Perkins has been involw
Quality Improvement program from the ox
including, her recent graduation from the T,
WHEREAS, Chesterfield County and the Bo
will miss Mrs. Perkins' diligent service; aN
WHEREAS, Mrs. Perkins' cheerfuln
friendliness, and loyalty will be rememberec
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that
County Board of Supervisors recognizes Mrs.
and extends their appreciation for her dedica
00-761
~d with the Total
set, up to and
I University; and
~rd of Supervisors
d
~ss, enthusiasm,
hy all.
the Chesterfield
Pearl M. Perkins
ed service to the
11/Zl/OO
County, their congratulations upon her retirement, and their
best wishes for a long and happy retirement.
Ayes: Warren, Humphrey, Barber, McHale and Miller.
Nays: None.
8 .B.2 .f.
RECOGNIZING MR. JAMES G. LUMPKIN, CHAIRMAN, STATE
MENTAL HEALTH, MENTAL RETARDATION AND SUBSTANCE
ABUSE SERVICES BOARD, UPON HIS RETIREMENT
On motion of Mr. McHale, seconded by Mr. Miller, the Board
adopted the following resolution:
WHEREAS, Mr. James G. "Punky" Lumpkin, resident of Dale
Magisterial District has been a valued member and chairman of
the State Board of Mental Health, Mental Retardation and
Substance Abuse Services since 1990; and
WHEREAS, during this time Mr. Lumpkin has been an
articulate spokesman and advocate for quality mental health,
mental retardation and substance abuse services in Chesterfield
County and across the Commonwealth; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Lumpkin was instrumental in establishing a
specialized program for persons with autism in Chesterfield
County through a public-private cooperative initiative in July,
1989; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Lumpkin has for many years demonstrated his
commitment and support of the programs and services provided
for Chesterfield citizens with behavioral health care needs.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Chesterfield
County Board of Supervisors recognizes Mr. James G. "Punky"
Lumpkin on his retirement from the State Board of Mental
Health, Mental Retardation and Substance Abuse Services and for
his ten years of significant contributions and dedicated
commitment to ensure quality services for persons with mental
disabilities across the Commonwealth and in Chesterfield
County.
Ayes: Warren, Humphrey, Barber, McHale and Miller.
Nays: None.
8.B.2.g. APPROVING THE JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT RESOLUTION
FOR THE COUNTY TO PARTICIPATE IN A PILOT PROJECT
TO PURCHASE ELECTRICITY COMPETITIVELY
On motion of Mr. McHale, seconded by Mr. Miller, the Board
adopted the following resolution:
WHEREAS, the VML/VACo Virginia Power Steering Committee
(the "Committee"), composed of representatives of the County of
Chesterfield and other municipalities and political
subdivisions of the Commonwealth, has for over several decades
negotiated on behalf of such governmental units their purchase
of electricity supply from Virginia Power as a sole source
provider; and
WHEREAS, Section 15.2-1300, et seq. of the Virginia Code
(the "Joint Powers Act") authorizes political subdivisions to
li/2i/O0
00-762
exercise jointly powers they otherwise
exercise independently, under the terms al
forth in the Joint Powers Act; and
WHEREAS, the Electric Utility Restructu
Act") further authorizes municipalities an
subdivisions in the Commonwealth to aggregate
supply requirements for the purpose of their
such requirements from licensed suppliers,
provides that such aggregation shall not requ
WHEREAS, the Virginia Public Procu
"Procurement Act") exempts from its competit
and competitive negotiation requirements (ti
the joint procurement by public bodies, uti
principles, of electricity supply purchas
associations under the conditions set forth
Act; and
WHEREAS, the Committee has voted unani
effort to aggregate local governmental pu
approximately 117,000,000 kwh of annual elect
"Supply") from competitive licensed supplie
period commencing no earlier than Janua
extending through no later than December 31
Period"); and
WHEREAS, the Committee recommends (i) t
joint procurement of the Supply as provided
Joint Powers Association Agreement, a copy of
to and made a part of this Resolution
Agreement"); (ii) that one or more reque
("RFP") be issued requesting licensed
"Proposers") to submit proposals (the "Prop(
the Supply to the interval accounts (the
by the Proposers from among approximately 200
of the municipalities and other political
presently purchase electricity supply fror
(iii) that for the Accounts selected, approx
kwh shall be for schools on Virginia Power's
and 110 and approximately 70% of the kwh
schools on its Rate Schedule 130; and (iv)
contracts for the furnishing of the Supply
Proposer (or Proposers) by considering wh!
are authorized to
~d conditions set
ling Act (the "EUR
t other political
their electricity
joint purchase ef
and the EUR Act
ire licensure; and
rement Act (the
Lve sealed bidding
le "Requirements")
.izing competitive
~d through member
Ln the Procurement
mously to fund an
rchases of up to
ricity supply (the
rs during a pilot
ry 1, 2001, and
2002 (the "Pilot
~e aggregation and
[n the form of the
which is attached
~he "Joint Powers
~ts for proposals
suppliers (the
)sals") to furnish
:counts") selected
interval accounts
subdivisions that
~ Virginia Power;
[mately 30% of the
Rate Schedules 100
~hall be for non-
~hat a contract or
be awarded to the
sh Proposals best
(i) meet the requirements and conditions of
the greatest dollar savings for the aggre
whole; and (iii) offer a price for each Acc(
is projected to be lower than the projectec
otherwise obtain applying the Virginia Power
which the Account would otherwise be served
WHEREAS, the Committee has agreed to
its operating budget in an amount not to exc
the fees and expenses of its counsel, Ch~
L.L.P., and its utility consultant, the C
prepare the documents necessary for the ag~
process, the evaluation of the Proposals,
execution of the contract or contracts {
municipalities and political subdivisions o~
for which the Supply will be furnished; and
WHEREAS, the Committee recommends that
and political subdivisions participating i
process agree to contribute back to the Co~
00-763
the RFP; (ii) offer
gated group as a
)unt selected that
price that would
supply rate under
and
rovide funds from
~ed $40,000 to pay
?istian & Barton,
}lumbia Group, to
rogation, the RFP
~nd the award and
)n behalf of the
~ning the Accounts
~he municipalities
the aggregation
~ittee's budget up
ii/2i/O0
to 25% of the estimated savings projected to be realized with
respect to such of their Accounts, if any, for which the Supply
is to be furnished during the Pilot Period, provided that the
aggregate of such contributions back to the Committee shall not
exceed $40,000; and
WHEREAS, the Committee recommends that the aggregation and
procurement of the Supply for the Pilot Period be effectuated
as provided in the Joint Powers Agreement utilizing competitive
principles pursuant to an exemption from the Requirements; and
WHEREAS, the procurement of the Supply through the Joint
Powers Agreement is structured such that the projected costs of
the electrical energy requirements of Chesterfield County can
only be less than such costs would otherwise be under otherwise
applicable rates, and it has heretofore been determined on
behalf of Chesterfield County that competitive sealed bidding
and competitive negotiations by Chesterfield County for such of
the Supply as may be applicable to any of its Accounts are not
fiscally advantageous to the public; and
WHEREAS, it appearing to the Board of Supervisors of
Chesterfield County that the joint procurement of the Supply
pursuant to the Joint Powers Agreement is otherwise in the best
interests of Chesterfield County.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED that:
(1) The aggregation and joint procurement of the Supply
during the Pilot Period pursuant to the Joint Powers Agreement
is hereby approved.
(2) The Joint Powers Agreement and the performance of the
terms and conditions thereof on behalf of Chesterfield County
are hereby authorized and approved subject to approval as to
form of any Electricity Supply Service Agreement by the County
Attorney.
(3) The County Administrator is hereby authorized and
directed to execute and deliver the Joint Powers Agreement on
behalf of Chesterfield County in substantially the form
presented to this meeting.
(4) The return to the Committee of up to 25% of any
savings projected to be realized by Chesterfield County on any
of its Accounts, as provided in and subject to the overall
limitation set forth in the Joint Powers Agreement, is hereby
authorized and approved.
(5) The payment obligations of Chesterfield County
pursuant to the provisions hereof and the Joint Powers
Agreement shall be subject to annual appropriation of requisite
funds therefor by the County of Chesterfield.
(6) This Resolution shall take effect immediately.
And, further, the Board authorized the County Administrator to
execute the Virginia Governmental Electricity Purchasing
Association Joint Powers Association Agreement and the
Electricity Supply Service Agreement.
Ayes: Warren, Humphrey, Barber, McHale and Miller.
Nays: None.
00-764
8.B.3. TRANSFER OF DISTRICT IMPROVEMENT FU~
8.B.3.a.
FROM THE MATOACA DISTRICT IMPROVE5
PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT Tf
AT ALBERTA SMITH ELEMENTARY SCHOOI
On motion of Hr. HcHale, seconded by Mr.
transferred $2,492 from the Matoaca Distric~
to the Parks and Recreation Department to i
Alberta Smith Elementary School.
Ayes: Warren, Humphrey, Barber, McHale and P
Nays: None.
DS
~.NT FUND TO
INSTALL FENCING
Iiller, the Board
Improvement Fund
nstall fencing at
filler.
8.B.3.b. FROM THE MATOACA DISTRICT IMPROVEb~NT FUND TO THE
POLICE DEPARTMENT TO PURCHASE A C£~PUTER AND CELL
PHONES FOR ETTRICK COMMUNITY POLIf
On motion of Mr. McHale, seconded by Mr.
transferred $3,300 from the Matoaca Distric~
to the Police Department to purchase a comput
for Ettrick Community Policing Office.
Ayes: Warren, Humphrey, Barber, McHale and P
Nays: None.
8.B.4.
APPROVAL OF UTILITY CONTRACT FOR STC
WAREHOUSE
On motion of Mr. McHale, seconded by Mr.
approved the following utility contract f
Warehouse - Contract Number 98-0134, wh~
extension of 919 L.F. + ef twelve inch evers
Stor-All, Ltd.
H & B Construction Comps
Developer:
Contractor:
Contract Amount: Estimated Total -
Total Estimated County Cost:
Water - Oversizing
Water - Offsite
Estimated Developer Cost
Code: (Cash Refund - Oversizing)
(Refunds thru Connection Fees - Of
District: Matoaca
Ayes: Warren, Humphrey, Barber, McHale and P
Nays: None.
8.B.5. ACCEPTANCE OF A PARCEL OF LAND ADJAC
SAFETY TRAINING COMPLEX ON ALLIED Re
On motion of Mr. McHale, seconded by Mr.
accepted the conveyance of a parcel of lan
Public Safety Training Complex from Honeywe
Incorporated, and authorized the County
execute the deed. (It is noted a copy of tP
is filed with the papers of this Board.)
Ayes: Warren, Humphrey, Barber, McHale and ~
Nays: None.
00-765
ING OFFICE
4iller, the Board
Improvement Fund
~r and cell phones
iller.
,R-ALL MINI
~iller, the Board
or Stor-All Mini
.ch includes the
izod water lines:
ny, Inc.
fsite)
iller.
$35,285.00
$7,043.00
$1,582.35
$26,659.65
ENT TO THE PUBLIC
4iller, the Board
adjacent to the
1 International,
Administrator to
e vicinity sketch
[iller.
8.B.6. AUTHORIZATION FOR THE COUNTY TO ENTER INTO A LICENSE
AGREEMENT WITH ROBERT K. WHITE AND DIANE L. WHITE FOR
CONSTRUCTION AND MAINTENANCE OF COUNTY DRAINAGE AND
SEW-ER FACILITIES
On motion of Mr. McHale, seconded by Mr. Miller, the Board
authorized the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors and the
County Administrator to execute a license agreement with Roger
K. White and Diane L. White for the construction and
maintenance of County drainage and sewer facilities.
Ayes: Warren, Humphrey, Barber, McHale and Miller.
Nays: None.
8.B.7. SET DATES FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS
8.B.7.a. TO CONSIDER THE CONVEYANCE OF LEASES OF REAL PROPERTY
AT VARIOUS PARK SITES AND ATHLETIC COMPLEXES FOR
OPERATION OF FOOD CONCESSIONS BY CO-SPONSORED
ATHLETIC ASSOCIATIONS AND LEAGUES
On motion of Mr. McHale, seconded by Mr. Miller, the Board set
the date of December 20, 2000 at 7:00 p.m. for a public hearing
to consider the conveyance of leases of real property for
operation of food concessions at various park sites by co-
sponsored athletic associations and leagues.
Ayes: Warren, Humphrey, Barber, McHale and Miller.
Nays: None.
8.B.7.b. TO CONSIDER THE APPROPRIATION OF FUNDS FOR TWO
SEPAPJ%TE SECONDARY ROAD HIGHWAY PROJECTS
On motion of Mr. McHale, seconded by Mr. Miller, the Board set
the date of December 20, 2000 at 7:00 p.m. for a public hearing
to consider the appropriation of $6.1 million in anticipated
Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) reimbursements for
the Newby's Bridge Road (Walmsley to Hagood) reconstruction
project and $770,000 in anticipated VDOT reimbursements for the
Winterfield/Salisbury intersection project.
Ayes: Warren, Humphrey, Barber, McHale and Miller.
Nays: None.
8.B.7.c. TO CONSIDER FY2002 ENHANCEMENT PROJECTS
On motion of Mr. McHale, seconded by Mr. Miller, the Board set
the date of December 20, 2000 at 7:00 p.m. for a public hearing
to consider FY2002 Enhancement Projects.
Ayes: Warren, Humphrey, Barber, McHale and Miller.
Nays: None.
00-766
li/2i/O0
8.B.8.
REQUESTS FOR PERMISSION
FROM BETTY E. WATTS TO INSTALL A
8. B. 8. a. 'RIVATE WATER
SEWER SERVICE WITHIN A PRIVATE EA: ',EMENT TO SERVE
PROPERTY ON GRAVIER ROAD
On motion of Mr. McHale, seconded by Mr.
approved a request from Betty E. Watts to
sewer service within a private easement to
11301 Gravier Road. (It is noted a copy of
with the papers of this Board.)
Ayes: Warren, Humphrey, Barber, McHale and
Nays: None.
8.B.8 .b.
FROM JESSUP FARMS, L.C. TO INSTAL
SERVICE WITHIN A PRIVATE EASEMENT
JESSUP FARMS, SECTION C
On motion of Mr. McHale, seconded by Mr.
approved a request from Jessup Farms, L.C. tc
sewer service within a private easement to se
Farms, Section C. IIt is noted a copy of
with the papers of this Board.)
Ayes: Warren, Humphrey, Barber, McHale and
Nays: None.
8.B.8.c.
FROM PARKER AND LANCASTER CORPORA
ASPHALT DRIVEWAY TO ENCROACH WITH]
WIDTH AND SIXTEEN FOOT DRAINAGE E~
LOT 4, GRAVITY HILL AT THE GROVE,
On motion of Mr. McHale, seconded by Mr.
approved a request from Parker and Lancaster
asphalt driveway to encroach within a v~
sixteen foot drainage easement across Lot 4
The Grove, Section 1, subject to the execu'
agreement. {It is noted a copy of the plat
papers of this Board.)
Ayes: Warren, Humphrey, Barber, McHale and ~
Nays: None.
8.B.9.
CONVEYANCE OF EASEMENT TO VIRGINIA
COMPANY TO PROVIDE SERVICE TO THE N~
TRAINING FACILITY
On motion of Mr. McHale, seconded by Mr.
authorized the Chairman of the Board of Su
County Administrator to execute an easemer
Virginia Electric and Power Company to inst~
provide service to the new Police and Fire
located on Allied Road.
Ayes: Warren, Humphrey, Barber, McHale and
Nays: None.
00-767
{iller, the Board
install a private
serve property at
the plat is filed
[iller.
A PRIVATE SEWER
TO SERVE LOT 37,
~iller, the Board
install a private
rve Lot 37, Jessup
the plat is filed
[iller.
'ION FOR AN
iN A VARIABLE
~SEMENT ACROSS
SECTION 1
4iller, the Board
2orporation for an
riable width and
, Gravity Hill at
~ion of a license
is filed with the
filler.
,LECTRIC AND POWER
,W POLICE AND FIRE
ditler, the Board
uervisors and the
it agreement with
11 power lines to
Training Facility
[iller.
11/21/00
8.B.10. REQUEST FOR PERMISSION TO STAGE A FIREWORKS DISPLAY
ON THE JAMES RIVER NEAR DUTCH GAP
On motion of Mr. McHale, seconded by Mr. Miller, the Board
approved a permit to stage a fireworks display on the James
River near Dutch Gap on December 9, 2000, with a rain date of
December 10, 2000.
Ayes: Warren, Humphrey, Barber, McHale and Miller.
Nays: None.
The following item was removed from the Consent Agenda for
Board discussion:
8.B.2.c. CONFIRMING PROCEEDINGS OF THE CHESTERFIELD
INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY FOR FINANCING OF
INDUSTRIAL REVENUE BONDS FOR BON SECOURS HEALTH
SYSTEMS
Mr. Barber stated that he has accepted a position on the Board
of Directors for Virginia HealthSource, an affiliate of Bon
Secours Health Systems. He further stated that Mr. Micas has
informed him that it does not represent a conflict of interest
and he is legally permitted to vote on this agenda item.
On motion of Mr. McHale, seconded by Mr. Warren, the Board
adopted the following resolution:
WHEREAS, Bon Secours-St. Francis Medical Center, Inc.
("St. Francis Medical Center"), a Virginia nonstock, nonprofit
corporation affiliated with Bon Secours Health System, Inc., a
Maryland nonstock, nonprofit corporation ("BSHSI"), has
facilities located in the County of Chesterfield, Virginia; and
WHEREAS, the Industrial Development Authority of the
County of Chesterfield (the "Authority"), on November 16, 2000
adopted an inducement resolution (the "Inducement Resolution")
wherein the Authority has agreed to issue not to exceed
$75,000,000 in aggregate principal amount, excluding any
original issue discount, of its Revenue Bonds, Series 2000 (Bon
Secours Health System, Inc.) (the "Bonds"), for the benefit of
St. Francis Medical Center to: (i) pay or reimburse St. Francis
Medical Center for the payment of the costs of acquiring,
constructing and equipping certain medical facilities of St.
Francis Medical Center (the "Project"), (ii) provide working
capital for St. Francis Medical Center, (iii) pay a portion of
the interest on the Bonds, (iv) fund a debt service reserve
fund and (v) pay certain expenses incurred in connection with
the issuance of the Bonds; and
WHEREAS, the Bonds will be issued pursuant to the Virginia
Industrial Development and Revenue Bond Act, Chapter 49, Title
15.2, Code of Virginia of 1950, as amended (the "Act"), and
will be limited obligations of the Authority payable solely
from the revenues and receipts derived from payments provided
by St. Francis Medical Center, BSHSI, and certain other
affiliated corporations; and
WHEREAS, on November 16, 2000, pursuant to the
requirements of Section 147(f) of the Internal Revenue Code of
1986, as amended (the "Code"), the Authority held a public
hearing concerning the proposed issuance of the Bonds; and
11/21/00
00-768
WHEREAS, the Authority has recommended ~nd requested
the Board of County Supervisors (the "Board'~
County, Virginia (the "County") approve th(
Bonds to comply with Section 147 f) of the
15.2-4906 of the Act; and
WHEREAS, copies of the following documen
with the Board: (i) the Inducement Resolutic
public hearing published once a week for two (
(iii) a summary of the proceedings of the pu
(iv) the fiscal impact statement of BSHSI.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, by the
Supervisors of Chesterfield County, Virginie
1. The Board hereby approves the issuan
the Authority for the benefit of St. Francis
the extent required by Section 147(f) of th(
15.2-4906 of the Act, to permit the Authorit
financing of certain medical facilities of S
Center.
2. Approval of the issuance of the Bor
Section 147(f) of the Code does not constitu
of the Bonds or the creditworthiness of St
Center or BSHSI and, as required by Section
Act, the Bonds shall provide that neither t
Authority shall be obligated to pay the Bone
thereon or other costs incident thereto
revenues and moneys pledged therefor, and ne~
credit nor the taxing power of the Commonwe
the County or the Authority shall be pledgec
3. The Board hereby authorizes and di~
the Board to forward a certified copy of this
Authority.
4. This resolution shall take effect im
adoption.
Ayes: Warren, Humphrey, Barber, McHale and ~
Nays: None.
9. HEARINGS OF CITIZENS ON UNSCHEDULED MAT~
There were no hearings of citizens on unsch
claims at this time.
10. REPORTS
On motion of Mr. McHale, seconded by Mr.
accepted a Status Report on the General Func
for Future Capital Projects, District Impr~
Lease Purchases.
Ayes: Warren, Humphrey, Barber, McHale and P
Nays: None.
11. DINNER
On motion of Mr. Miller, seconded by Mr.
recessed to the Administration Building, Rool
Ayes: Warren, Humphrey, Barber, McHale and ~
Nays: None.
00-769
that
) of Chesterfield
issuance of the
Code and Section
~s have been filed
n; (ii) notice of
~onsecutive weeks;
blic hearing; and
Board of County
2e of the Bonds by
{edical Center, to
Code and Section
to assist in the
Francis Medical
ds as required by
te an endorsement
Francis Medical
15.2-4908 of the
~e County nor the
s or the interest
except from the
.ther the faith or
alth of Virginia,
thereto.
ects the Clerk of
resolution to the
nediately upon its
iller.
ERS OR CLAIMS
eduled matters or
~arber, the Board
Balance, Reserve
)vement Funds and
iller.
~cHale, the Board
502, for dinner.
[ller.
ii/2i/O0
Reconvening:
12. INVOCATION
Reverend Wayne Mancari, Pastor of Cornerstone Assembly of God
gave the invocation.
13. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG OF THE UNITED STATES
OFAMERICA
Mr. Paul Brodi, Mr. Shawn Kelly and Mr. Evan Nelms, members of
Boy Scout Treop 829, led the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag
ef the United States ef America.
14. RESOLUTIONS AND SPECIAL RECOGNITIONS
o RECOGNIZING MS. RADA ELLEN OWEN ON HER ATHLETIC ABILITY
AND ACHIEVF/qENTS ON A NATIONAL AND INTERNATIONAL SCALE
Mr. Kappel introduced Ms. Rada Owen who was present to receive
the resolution.
On motion of the Board, the following resolution was adopted:
WHEREAS, Ms. Rada Ellen Owen is a 1996 graduate of
Manchester High School; and
WHEREAS, Ms. Owen went on to win multiple All-America
honors at Auburn University; and
WHEREAS, Ms. Owen represented the United States in the
2000 Olympics in Sydney, Australia; and
WHEREAS, Ms. Owen competed in the 200 meter freestyle and
800 meter freestyle relays; and
WHEREAS, this status, along with her diligence and spirit,
have brought honor to Chesterfield County; and
WHEREAS, such distinction is worthy of recognition by this
Beard and by the citizens ef Chesterfield Ceunty, Virginia.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Chesterfield
County Board of Supervisors publicly recognizes Ms. Rada Ellen
Owen for her athletic ability and her achievements on a
national and international scale, and wishes her well in her
future endeavors in swimming and her other career and athletic
endeavors.
AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that a copy of this
resolution be presented to Ms. Owen and that this resolution be
permanently recorded among the papers of this Board of
Supervisors of Chesterfield County, Virginia.
Ayes: Warren, Humphrey, Barber, McHale and Miller.
Nays: None.
11/21/00
00-770
Mr. Warren presented the executed resolut
accompanied by her parents, congratulated hc
achievements, and wished her success in fut~
Ms. Owen expressed appreciation to ths
recognition and stated that she looks forwa~
Athens in 2004.
15. REQUESTS FOR MOBILE HOME PERMITS AND R~
ion to Ms. Owen,
r on her athletic
re endeavors.
Board for the
d to competing in
,ZONING PLACED ON
THE CONSENT AGENDA TO BE HEARD IN THE ~'OLLOWING ORDER:
- WITHDRAWALS/DEFERRALS - CASES WHERE ]'HE APPLICANT
ACCEPTS THE RECOMMENDATION AND THERE If NO OPPOSITION
- CASES WHERE THE APPLICANT DOES NOT A¢:CEPT THE
~PPOSITION WILL
RECOMMENDATION AND/OR THERE IS PUBLIC
BE HEARD AT SECTION 17
01HP0116
In Bermuda Magisterial District, ROY W. AND
request landmark designation and amendment
map for the SHIRLEY SEMINARY property an{
density of such amendment will be cont~
conditions or Ordinance standards. The C
suggests the property is appropriate for r
1.01 to 2.50 units per acre. This re
Residential (R-7) District on 1.03 acres and
Richmond Street. Tax ID 790-654-0759 (Shec
Mr. Jacobson presented a summary of Case 01
that the Preservation Committee and the P1
recommend approval.
Mr. Roy Scholt stated that the recommendati
There was no opposition present.
On motion of Mr. McHale, seconded by Mrs. H
approved historic landmark designation for th
property and structure, described as follows
The property known as Tax ID 790-654-0759
Shirley Seminary structure located on the p
Ayes: Warren, Humphrey, Barber, McHale and P
~RGARET N. SCHOLT
f zoning district
structure. The
;olled by zoning
Dmprehensive Plan
~sidential use of
~uest lies in a
is known as 12141
t 26).
HP0116 and stated
arming Commission
n is acceptable.
mphrey, the Board
Shirley Seminary
Sheet 26) and the
operty.
iller.
Nays: None.
01SN0119
In Bermuda Magisterial
rezoning and amendment
District, WALMAC, L.L.C. requests
of zoning district map from Light
Industrial (I-1) to General Business (C-5).
such amendment will be controlled by zoni
Ordinance standards. The Cemprehensive ~
preperty is apprepriate for commercial use.
en approximately 5.1 acres frenting approxin
the nerth line ef Ruffin Hill Road, alse fro
line ef Reute 1-95 and is lecated in the her'
the intersectien ef these reads. Tax ID 804-
(Sheet 35).
00-771
The density of
ng conditions or
lan suggests the
This request lies
~ately 450 feet on
.nting on the east
~heast quadrant of
-638-2156 and 5183
ii/2i/O0
Mr. Jacobson presented a summary of Case 01SN0119 and stated
that the Planning Commission and staff recommend approval and
acceptance of the proffered conditions. He noted that the
request conforms to the Southern and Western Area Plan.
Mr. Les Saunders, representing the applicant, stated that the
recommendation is..acceptable.
There was no opposition present.
On motion of Mr. McHale, seconded by Mrs. Humphrey, the Board
approved Case 01SN0119 and accepted the following proffered
conditions:
The first-story facade of any building shall not be
constructed of "Dry-Vit". The first-story facades of all
buildings shall be constructed of brick or other masonry
material. (P)
2. The following C-5 uses shall not be permitted:
Fraternal uses
Liquor stores
Material reclamation, receiving centers-aluminum,
glass, plastic and paper products only
Tire recapping and vulcanizing establishments
Fur dressing and Dyeing
Linoleum, asphalt-felt based and other hard surface
floor cover manufacturing
Mortician's goods manufacturing
Paper recycling by the compaction method
Rectifying and blending of liquors
Wholesaling houses and distributors of alcoholic
beverages
Wine, brandy and brandy spirits manufacturing. (P)
3. The Public water system shall be used. (U)
Prior to issuance of a final certificate of occupancy for
any development that is anticipated to generate traffic
that warrants a left turn lane at the Ruffin Mill Road
Connector/Ruffin Mill Road intersection based on
Transportation Department standards, additional pavements
shall be constructed along Ruffin Mill Road at the Ruffin
Mill Road Connector to provide a left turn lane. The
developer shall dedicate to Chesterfield County, free and
unrestricted any additional right-of-way (or easements)
required for this road improvement. (T)
Ail outside storage and loading areas shall be screened
from view of limited access roads, in accordance with the
screening requirements of the Zoning Ordinance.
Ayes: Warren, Humphrey, Barber, McHale and Miller.
Nays: None.
01SN0134 ~/gD 01SN0135
In Matoaca Magisterial District, CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOA/{D OF
SUPERVISORS AlgD CHESTERFIELD PLANNING COMMISSION request
Conditional Use Planned Development and amendment of zoning
district map to permit exceptions to Zoning and Subdivision
Ordinance requirements. The density of such amendment will be
11/2i/00
00-772
controlled by zoning conditions or Ordinano
Comprehensive Plan suggests the property
rural conservation area use. This req~
Agricultural (A) District en 119.5 acres ftc
places for a total of approximately 1,150 fee
of Moseley Road, approximately 8,450 feet no~
Road. Tax IDs 688-680-5190; 689-679-3986 a
3654 and 8497; 689-681-2037; 689-682-3510;
5980; and 690-681-0614 (Sheets 8 and 14).
Mr. Jacobson presented a summary of Cases 01SI
and stated that the Planning Commission an~
approval subject to conditions.
Mr. Miller stated that he owns stock in two c(
either mortgages or deeds of trust for two
involved in the subject case. He further sta
has informed him that his ownership interest ,
a conflict of interest and he is legally per
this case.
Mr. Kirk Turner, representing the applicant
recommendation is acceptable. He noted
"Skitch" Rudy is present at the meeting,
affected property owners.
When asked, Mr. Rudy stated that the propert5
the Planning Commission's recommendation.
There was no opposition present.
On motion of Mrs. Humphrey, seconded by Mr.
approved Cases 01SN0t34 and 01SN0135 subject
conditions:
The parcels identified as A through D s
the plat prepared by Balzer and As:
September 12, 2000 and entitled "Compil(
Parcels Lying North of Moseley Road", sh
conformance with this plat.
Building permits shall not be issued
parcel until such time as all Tax ID~
parcel have been combined and recorded a
Provided, however, that all parcels shal
and recorded with in six (6) months o
this request. Parcels may, however, be
that shown on the plat provided suc
conforms to the Zoning and Subdivision
With approval of this request, a five ~
to the forty (40) foot required side y
fifty-eight (58) foot exception to the
front yard setback for the principal bt
Tax ID 689-679-6485 (Parcel A) shall be
a seventy-one (71) foot exception to the
front yard setback for the principal bt
Tax ID 690-680-5496 (Parcel F) shall b~
Ayes:
Nays:
Warren, Humphrey, Barber, McHale an¢
None.
00-773
standards. The
appropriate for
est lies in an
nting in four (4)
~ on the west line
;th of Skinquarter
nd 6485; 689-680-
690-680-5496 and
~0134 and 01SN0135
staff recommend
mpanies that hold
of the properties
~ed that Mr. Micas
Joes not represent
mitted to vote on
, stated that the
that Mr. Oliver
representing the
owners agree with
McHale, the Board
to the following
nd F through G on
ociates, revised
d Plat of Several
~11 be recorded in
~n any individual
comprising such
a single parcel.
_1 be reconfigured
the approval of
reconfigured from
~ reconfiguration
Ordinances. (P)
5) foot exception
ard setback and a
required 150 foot
tilding located on
granted. Further,
required 150 foot
lilding located on
granted. (P)
Miller.
il/2i/O0
16. PUBLIC HEARINGS
16.A. TO CONSIDER PROPOSED CHARTER AMENDMENTS
Mr. Micas stated that this date and time has been advertised
for a public hearing to consider proposed Charter amendments to
be taken to the 2001 General Assembly.
No one was present to speak to the ordinance.
When asked, Mr. Micas stated that the references to State Code
being changed in the County Charter do not represent a
substantive change.
On motion of Mr. McHale, seconded by Mrs. Humphrey, the Board
adopted the following ordinance:
AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE CODE OF THE COUNTY
OF CHESTERFIELD, 1997, AS AMENDED, BY AMENDING AND REENACTING
SECTIONS 2.1, 4.2, 5.1, 6.7, 7.4, 7.6 AND 7.7 OF THE CHARTER
BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield
County:
(1) That Sections 2.1, 4.2, 5.1, 6.7, 7.4, 7.6 and 7.7 of
the Charter of the Code of the County of Chesterfield, 1997, as
amended, are amended and reenacted to read as follows:
2.1. General grant of powers.
The powers set forth in title 15.2 of the Code of Virginia
and all other powers which are now or may be conferred upon or
delegated to counties under the Constitution and laws of the
Commonwealth and all other powers pertinent to the conduct of
a county are hereby specifically conferred upon the County of
Chesterfield, and no enumeration of particular powers in this
charter shall be held to be exclusive but shall be held to be
in addition to this general grant of powers. The scope of all
powers conferred by this charter shall be liberally interpreted
so as to best effectuate the responsibility of the board of
supervisors to perform its duty to govern the county.
o o o
4.2. Duties and responsibilities.
The county administrator shall have all the responsibility
and shall carry out all the duties prescribed by ~15.2-407 of
the Code of Virginia, as now and hereafter may be amended and
in addition, such other duties and responsibilities as may be
established by the board of supervisors.
o o o
5.1. Fiscal year.
The fiscal year of the county shall begin on the first day
of July of each year and shall also constitute the budget and
accounting year. Except as provided for in this charter, the
provisions of title 15.2 of the Code of Virginia shall control
the preparation, consideration, adoption and execution of the
budget of the county.
11/21/00
00-774
o o o
§ 6.7. Department of police.
The police department shall be compos
police and such officers, patrolmen and othe]
board of supervisors may determine. The pow(
forth in ~§15.2-1704 and 15.2-1710 of the
shall apply to the police force. The chief ~
responsible for the immediate direction an
department. The chief shall solely, within
subject to the other provisions herein,
promote, and terminate such officers, patrol
He shall also select, employ, promote and tel
warden and his deputies, provided that all ol
§3.1-796.104 of the Code of Virginia remair
chief may adopt rules and regulations for the
in the same manner as rules and regulation:
other departments.
o o o
7.4. Planning department.
The planning department shall be compose
planning and such employees as the board o
determine. The planning department sba
responsibilities as are imposed by general
assigned by the planning commission and boar
The director of planning shall have immedi
control of the department, shall be appoint
administrator and shall serve subject to ti
conditions as are applicable to other depa~
addition to the authority granted to the
appeals pursuant to §15.2-2309 of the Code
board of supervisors by ordinance may authori
planning to grant a variance of not more than
any building setback requirement contained
zoning or subdivision ordinance if he find~
that the strict application of the ordinai
~d of a chief of
~ employees as the
~rs and duties set
Code of Virginia
if police shall be
d control of the
~is discretion and
select, employ,
ten and employees.
?minate the animal
~her provisions of
in effect. The
police department
are adopted for
of a director of
ff supervisors may
11 perform such
Law and as may be
d of supervisors.
ate direction and
ed by the county
.e same terms and
}tment heads. In
board of zoning
of Virginia, the
ze the director of
two (2) feet from
in the county's
in writing; (i)
ce would produce
undue hardship; (ii) that such hardship is hOp shared generally
by other properties in the same zoning distriNt and in the same
vicinity; and (iii) that the authorizatio~of such variance
will not be of substantial detriment to adjScent property and
that the character of the zoning district wi
by the granting of the variance.
o o o
7.6. Substantial accord review of county
Any public area, facility or use owned
Chesterfield within its territorial limit
approved by the board of supervisors followin
held pursuant to the county's zoning ordinan(
from the requirement for submittal to and
county's planning commission or governing hod
of the Code of Virginia, so long as such publ
or use remains subject to the requiremen-
ordinance.
00-775
11 not be changed
facilities.
by the County of
which has been
a public hearing
~e shall be exempt
approval by the
under ~15.2-2232
_ic area, facility
~s of the zoning
ii/ei/O0
7.7. Transportation improvement districts.
The board of supervisors may create transportation
improvement districts relating to interstate, primary and
secondary roads in commercial or industrial areas, subject to
the procedures, conditions and limitations provided in chapter
47 of title 15.2 of the Code of Virginia, to the extent that
such procedures, conditions and limitations are not
inconsistent with the authority granted by this section. The
provisions of ~15.2-4526 and 15.2-4533 of the Code of Virginia
shall apply, mutatis mutandis. The petitions required to
create or enlarge a district must be signed by fifty-one (51)
percent of the owners of land within the proposed district.
Each district which may be created shall include only one
highway project, and the boundaries of one district may not
overlap those of any other district.
(2) That this ordinance shall become effective
immediately upon adoption.
Ayes: Warren, Humphrey, Barber, McHale and Miller.
Nays: None.
16 .B.
TO CONSIDER THE TAX EXEMPTION REQUEST OF THE KIWANIS
CLUB OF CHESTER, INCORPORATED FOUNDATION
Mr. Micas stated that this date and time has been advertised
for a public hearing to consider the tax exemption request of
the Kiwanis Club of Chester, Incorporated Foundation.
On motion of Mr. McHale, seconded by Mrs. Humphrey, the Board
adopted the following resolution:
RESOLUTION SUPPORTING THE DESIGNATION OF PROPERTY OF
THE KIWANIS CLUB OF CHESTER, INC. FOUNDATION AS EXEMPT
FROM TAXATION BY THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF VIRGINIA
WHEREAS, Kiwanis Club of Chester, Inc. Foundation is a
non-stock, non-profit corporation which provides public
services to underprivileged citizens of the County, including
scholarships to graduating seniors of Chesterfield County
Public Schools; and
WHEREAS, Kiwanis Club of Chester, Inc. Foundation owns
real property located in the Bermuda Magisterial District of
Chesterfield County, Virginia at 12321 Richmond Street in
Chester; and
WHEREAS, real property used exclusively for public park
and playground purposes by a qualifying organization shall be
exempt from taxation as authorized by Article X, Section
6(a) (6) of the Constitution of Virginia, upon action by the
General Assembly of Virginia and so long as such organization
is operated not for profit and the property so exempt is used
in accordance with the purpose for which the organization is
classified; and
WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County,
Virginia has considered the following factors before the
adoption of this resolution in support of the tax exempt status
of the Kiwanis Club of Chester, Inc. Foundation as follows:
00-776
1. The Kiwanis Club of Chester, In
exempt from federal income taxation pursuant
of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986.
2. No current annual alcoholic beve
serving alcoholic beverages has been issuec
Alcoholic Beverage Control Board to the
Chester, Inc. Foundation for use on th
property.
3. No director or officer of the
Chester, Inc. Foundation is paid any compens~
the value of the services performed in such
corporation.
4. No part of the net earnings of th
Chester, Inc. Foundation inures to the
individual.
5. The Kiwanis Foundation, Inc. prov
the common good of the public.
6. No part of the activities of the
Chester, Inc. Foundation involves carrying
otherwise attempting to influence legislation
does not participate in, or intervene i~
campaign on behalf of any candidate for publ
7. The Kiwanis Club of Chester, Inc.
rule, regulation,' policy or practice which di
basis of religious conviction, race, color,
origin.
8. This year the above-mentioned prop(
a value of $60,000 and generated $684.00 in (
tax. In 1999, the property generated $684.C
estate taxes.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, by the Bo
of Chesterfield County as follows:
1. That this Board supports the reque
Club of Chester, Inc. Foundation for exemptio
its real property pursuant to Article X, Sect
Constitution of Virginia and the provisions
Title 58.1 of the Code of VirGinia, 1950, as
such exemption should be categorized as
playground.
2. That the County Administrator is d~
a certified copy of this resolution to thc
Chester, Inc. Foundation, so that they i
legislation be introduced in the 2001 Get
achieve the purposes of this resolution.
3. The effective date of this res
November 21, 2000.
Ayes: Warren, Humphrey, Barber, McHale and
Nays: None.
00-777
s. Foundation is
to Section 501(c)
rage license for
· by the Virginia
Kiwanis Club of
e organization's
Kiwanis Club of
.tion in excess of
~osition with the
Kiwanis Club of
benefit of any
des services for
Kiwanis Club of
on propaganda or
The corporation
, any political
ic office.
Foundation has no
~criminates on the
ender or national
rty is assessed at
lounty real estate
0 in County real
~rd of Supervisors
~t of the Kiwanis
from taxation of
on 6(a) (6) of the
of Chapter 36 of
amended, and that
public park and
rected to forward
Kiwanis Club of
lay request that
eral Assembly to
slution shall be
[iller.
17. REMAINING MOBILE HOME PERMITS AND ZONING REQUESTS
01SN0117
In Matoaca Magisterial District, SBA COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION
requests Conditional Use Planned Development and amendment of
zoning district map to permit a communications tower with
height exception in an Agricultural (A) District. The density
of such amendment will be controlled by zoning conditions or
Ordinance standards. The Comprehensive Plan suggests the
property is appropriate for 1.0 to 5.0 acre residential lots.
This request lies on 6.0 acres fronting approximately 70 feet
on the east line of Cattail Road, approximately 1,120 feet
south of Reedy Branch Road. Tax ID 763-632-Part of 7515
(Sheets 33 and 40).
Ms. Beverly Rogers presented a summary of Case 01SN0117 and
stated that staff recommended denial because of the proximity
of the proposed tower site to existing and proposed roads. She
further stated that, to address the recommendations of the
tower siting policy, the Planning Commission and Board have
required a setback of approximately 1,000 feet from existing
roads located in the areas planned for residential development.
She stated that the Planning Commission recommends approval
subject to conditions and indicated that it was the consensus
of the Commission that the site is located in a rural area that
is not anticipated to be developed in the near future.
When asked, Ms. Rogers stated that the proposed thoroughfare
roads will probably be built as the property is developed for
some future use; there is no development currently planned for
which the tower would be an obstruction; and the edge of the
proposed tower site is approximately 900 feet from Cattail Road
and approximately 850 feet from proposed roads.
Mr. Steve Romine, representing the applicant, stated that the
Planning Commission's recommendation is acceptable.
There was no opposition present.
On motion of Mrs. Humphrey, seconded by Mr. McHale, the Board
approved Case 01SN0117 subject to the following conditions:
There shall be no signs permitted to identify this use.
o
The base of the tower shall be enclosed by a minimum six
(6) foot high fence, designed to preclude trespassing. A
detailed plan depicting this requirement shall be
submitted to the Planning Department for approval. (?)
The tower and equipment shall be designed and installed so
as not to interfere with the Chesterfield County Public
Safety Trunked System. At the time of site plan review or
prior to release of a building permit, whichever occurs
first, the owner/developer shall submit information as
deemed necessary by the Chesterfield County Communications
and Electronics staff to determine if an engineering study
should be performed to analyze the possibility of radio
frequency interference with the County system, based upon
tower location, height and upon the frequencies and
effective radiated power generated by tower-mounted
equipment. Prior to release of a building permit, the
study, if required, shall be submitted to, and approved
00-778
by, the Chesterfield County Communicatio
staff. (GS)
The developer shall be responsible fc
frequency problems which affect the Ch
Public Safety Trunked System caused b5
corrections shall be made immediately
up
the Chesterfield County Communication~
staff. (GS)
The color and lighting system for the
follows:
The tower shall be gray or anoth,
acceptable to the Planning Departu
If lighted, lighting during dayli~
limited to medium intensity st~
~s and Electronics
,r correcting any
esterfield County
· this use. Such
}n notification by
and Electronics
.ower shall be as
r neutral color,
ont.
ht hours shall be
~obe lights with
upward reflection and lighting curing night time
hours shall be limited to soft bl nking lights.
c. The tower shall be of a monopole
Any building or mechanical equipment
Sections 19-570 (b) and (c) and 19-
Ordinance relative to screening of mec
and architectural treatment of buildinc
(NOTE: Section 19-570 (b) and (c)
screening of mechanical equipment
accessory boxes located on the buildi
adjacent properties and public rights
would not be required for the tower
equipment.)
At such time that the tower ceases
communications purposes for a period exc
consecutive months, the owner/develope
and remove the tower and all associated
property. (P)
In conjunction with the approval of this
nine {49) foot exception to the 150 foot
shall be granted. (P)
A minimum 100 foot buffer shall be mair
perimeter of the tower site. Access and
use, which may be extended generally per
this buffer, shall be permitted in thi
this buffer, existing healthy trees
caliper ef 2.5 inches shall be maintai
shall be supplemented where necessary
views ef the tower and associated equip~
esign. (P)
shall comply with
5'95 of the Zoning
hanical equipment
exteriors. (P)
}uld require the
nd junction and
~g or ground from
f way. Screening
or tower-mounted
to be used for
eeding twelve (12)
r shall dismantle
equipment from the
request, a forty-
height limitation
rained around the
ntilities for this
~endicular through
~ buffer. Within
having a minimum
ned. These trees
to minimize the
~ent from adjacent
properties and public rights of way. Additional plantings
shall consist of species of trees ~aving an average
minimum mature crown spread of greate~than thirty (30)
feet and a minimum caliper of 2.5 inches at the time of
planting, to achieve minimum density o~ one (1) tree for
each 300 square feet of cleared_area. I
site plan submission, or pri%r to ~'{
building permit, whichever occurs fir
plan depicting this requirement shall b,
Planning Department for review and app:
Ayes: Warren, Humphrey, Barber, McHale and
Nays: None.
00-779
conjunction with
.he releas~ of a
~t, a landscaping
~ submitted to the
;oval. (P)
Iiller.
18. AD JOURNMENT
On motion of Mr. McHale, seconded by Mr. Warren, the Board
adjourned at 7:16 p.m. until December 20, 2000 at 1:00 p.m. for
a reception and session with members of the School Board.
Ayes: Warren, Humphrey, Barber, McHale and Miller.
Nays: None.
Arthur S. Warren
Chairman
11/2i/00
00-780