01-08-1997 MinutesBOARD OF SUPERVISORS
MINUTES
January 8, 1997
Supervisors in Attendance:
Mr. Arthur S. Warren, Chairman
Mrs. Renny B. Humphrey, Vice Chrm.
Mr. Edward B. Barber
Mr. Harry G. Daniel
Mr. J. L. McHale, III
Mr. Lane B. Ramsey
County Administrator
Staff in Attendance:
Chief Carl Baker,
Police Department
Mr. Craig Bryant, Dir.,
Utilities
Mr. Steven Calabro, Dir.,
County Airport
Ms. Marilyn Cole, Asst.
County Administrator
Mr. Richard Cordle,
Treasurer
Ms. Faith L. Davis,
Clerk to the Board
Chief F. W. Dolezal,
Fire Department
Mr. William D. Dupler,
Building Official
Mr. Michael Golden, Dir.,
Parks and Recreation
Mr. Lawrence C. Haake, III,
Registrar
Mr. Bradford S. Hammer,
Deputy Co. Admin.,
Management Services
Mr. Russell Harris,
County Ombudsman
Mr. Thomas E. Jacobson,
Dir., Planning
Mr. Donald Kappel, Dir.,
Public Affairs
Ms. Mary Lou Lyle,
Dir., Accounting
Mr. Robert L. Masden,
Deputy Co. Admin.,
Human Services
Mr. R. John McCracken,
Dir., Transportation
Mr. Richard M. McElfish,
Dir., Env. Engineering
Mr. Gary R. McLaren, Dir.,
Economic Development
Mr. Steven L. Micas,
County Attorney
Mr. Francis M. Pitaro, Dir.,
General Services
Mr. James J. L. Stegmaier,
Dir., Budget & Management
Mr. M. D. Stith, Jr.,
Deputy Co. Admin.,
Community Development
Mr. Frederick Willis, Jr.,
Dir., Human Resource Mgt.
Mr. Daniel called the regularly scheduled meeting to order at
3:05 p.m.
1/8/97
97-1
1. ORGANIZATIONAL MEETING
1.A. ELECTION OF CHAIRMAN AND VICE CHAIRMAN AND CONSIDERATION
OF BOARD APPOINTMENTS
Mr. Ramsey congratulated each of the Board members on their new
election and expressed appreciation to the Board members for
their leadership and a tremendously successful 1996. He stated
the first order of business would be the election of Chairman
and Vice Chairman. He noted nominations do not require a second
and the first nominee to receive a majority vote will be
Chairman for 1997.
Mr. Daniel nominated Mr. Warren to :serve as Chairman for 1997.
Nominations for election of Chairman of the Board of Supervisors
were closed.
The vote on election of Mr. Warren 'to serve as Chairman of the
Board of Supervisors for 1997 was as follows:
Mr. Daniel : Aye.
Mr. Warren : Aye.
Mr. Barber : Aye.
Mrs. Humphrey: Aye.
Mr. Daniel : Aye.
Mr. Warren was elected as Chairman.
Mr. Warren expressed appreciation to the Board for their
confidence in nominating him to serve as Chairman for 1997. He
stated that the Board had a very successful 1996 year and worked
well together as a team and that he looks forward to a very
successful 1997 year. He further stated that the Board has
always come together on issues for the good of the County and
that success this past year was culminated by approval of the
Bond Referendum. He stated that this year the Board will
implement the Referendum; will work hard to protect the County's
drinking water resources; will continue to build on the County's
educational system; and will continue to promote public safety
programs and activities.
Mr. Daniel nominated Mrs. Humphrey to serve as Vice Chairman for
1997.
Nominations for election of Vice Chairman of the Board of
Supervisors were closed.
The vote on election of Mrs. Humphrey to serve as Vice Chairman
of the Board of Supervisors for 199'7 was as follows:
Mr. Warren : Aye.
Mr. Barber : Aye.
Mr. Daniel : Aye.
Mrs. Humphrey: Aye.
Mr. McHale : Aye.
Mrs. Humphrey was elected Vice Chairman.
Mrs. Humphrey expressed appreciation for the Board's confidence
in her ability to serve as Vice Chairman. She stated that 1996
was a learning experience as a new elected official and
expressed appreciation to each of the members of the Board for
their assistance this past year. She further stated that the
Board is serving Chesterfield County citizens very well as
indicated by the passing of the Bond Referendum. She stated
that she looks forward to the upcoming year.
97-2
1/8/97
On motion of Mr. McHale, seconded by Mr. Barber, the Board
suspended its rules at this time to allow simultaneous
nomination/appointment/reappointment of a members to serve on
the Tri-Cities Area Metropolitan Planning Organization; the
Metropolitan Richmond Convention & Visitors Bureau; the Capital
Area Training Consortium; the Carpenter Center Board of
Directors; and the Maymont Foundation.
Vote: Unanimous
0 TRI-CITIES AREA METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION
On motion of Mr. McHale, seconded by Mrs. Humphrey, the Board
simultaneously nominated/reappointed Mrs. Renny B. Humphrey to
serve on the Tri-Cities Area Metropolitan Planning Organization
whose term is effective immediately and will expire December 31,
1997.
Vote: Unanimous
o METROPOLITAN RICHMOND CONVENTION & VISITORS BUREAU (MRC&VB)
On motion of Mr. McHale, seconded by Mrs. Humphrey, the Board
simultaneously nominated/appointed Mr. Arthur S. Warren to serve
on the Metropolitan Richmond Convention & Visitors Bureau
(MRC&VB) whose term is effective immediately and will expire
December 31, 1997.
Vote: Unanimous
o CAPITAL AREA TRAINING CONSORTIUM
Mrs. Humphrey stated that she would like to offer the Capital
Area Training Consortium to the School Board as she feels much
of the issues dealt with by this committee are pertinent to some
of the educational and training programs that the School Board
may be addressing or allow for a County staff person to serve on
this committee.
Mr. Ramsey stated that the By-laws of this organization requires
that the governing bodies must serve on this committee. He
further stated that meeting times for this committee are very
difficult for Board of Supervisor members to attend. He stated
that Mr. Masden currently attends all these meetings and
functions as the County's liaison with the Consortium. He
recommended that Mr. Masden be appointed to the Consortium with
a recommendation that this committee's By-laws be amended to
allow for a staff person to serve rather than an elected
official.
There was brief discussion relative to the Consortium agreement,
not federal funding, requiring that an elected official serve on
Capital Area Training Consortium.
On motion of Mr. McHale, seconded by Mrs. Humphrey, the Board
simultaneously nominated/appointed Mr. Robert L. Masden to serve
on the Capital Area Training Consortium whose term is at the
pleasure of the Board.
And, further, the Board requested that the Consortium's By-laws
be amended to allow that County staff be able to serve in this
capacity rather than an elected official.
Vote: Unanimous
1/8/97
97-3
O CARPENTER CENTER BOARD OF DIRECTORS
On motion of Mr. McHale, seconded by Mrs. Humphrey, the Board
simultaneously nominated/reappointed Mr. J. L. McHale, III to
serve on the Carpenter Center Board of Directors whose term is
at the pleasure of the Board.
Vote: Unanimous
o MAYMONT FOUNDATION
On motion of Mr. McHale, seconded by Mrs. Humphrey, the Board
simultaneously nominated/appointed Mr. Harry G. Daniel to serve
on the Maymont Foundation whose term is effective immediately
and will expire December 31, 1997.
Vote: Unanimous
Mr. Warren confirmed the following committee appointments:
o BUDGET AND AUDIT COMMITTEE
Mr. McHale and Mr. Daniel (Unspecified Term)
o COUNTY EMPLOYEE BENEFITS COMMITTEE
Mr. Barber and Mrs. Humphrey (Unspecified Term)
o COUNTY OFFICE SPACE NEEDS COMMITTEE
Mr. Barber and Mrs. Humphrey (Unspecified Term)
o COURTS SPACE AND FAMILY COURTS COMMITTEE
Mr. Barber and Mr. McHale (Unspecified Term)
o SCHOOL BOARD LIAISON COMMITTEE
Mr. Warren and Mr. Daniel (Unspecified Term)
o SOLID WASTE ADVISORY COMMITTEE
Mrs. Humphrey
(Term would be a one year term beginning January 1, 1997 and
expiring December 31, 1997)
1.B. ADOPTION OF MEETING PROCEDURES GOVERNING BOARD OF
SUPERVISORS
Mr. Micas stated staff is recommending the Procedures Governing
the Board of Supervisors Meetings basically remain the same with
the exception of several changes designed to conform to the
procedures of the Board's actual practices.
After brief discussion, on motion of Mr. McHale, seconded by
Mrs. Humphrey, the Board adopted the meeting Procedures
Governing the Board of Supervisors Meetings for 1997, as
amended. (It is noted a copy of the 1997 Procedures of the
Board of Supervisors is filed with the papers of this Board.)
Vote: Unanimous
97-4
1/8/97
1.C. SETTING OF REGULAR MEETING DATES FOR 1997
Mr. Ramsey reviewed the regular meeting dates for 1996 and
stated the schedule would remain the same. He noted the months
in which there is only one meeting -- July, August, and December
-- the meetings would begin at 2:00 p.m. instead of 3:00 p.m.
and the second meeting in November would be held two days before
Thanksgiving rather than the eve of Thanksgiving. He then
reviewed special meeting dates for 1996 and stated several Board
members have requested a change in the meeting schedule and
could amend the schedule at this time.
Mr. Daniel requested a caveat be included that allows for no new
Agenda Item to begin after 11:00 p.m. during a Board meeting.
Mr. Micas stated that the Board would need to amend its meeting
Procedures to provide that no new Agenda Item would be
considered after 11:00 p.m. without unanimous consensus of the
Board.
After brief discussion, on motion of Mr. Daniel, seconded by Mr.
Barber, the Board adopted the recommended regular and special
meeting date schedule for 1997, as follows:
January 8, 1997 at 4:00 p.m.
January 22, 1997 at 4:00 p.m.
February 12, 1997 at 4:00 p.m.
February 26, 1997 at 4:00 p.m.
March 12, 1997 at 4:00 p.m.
March 26, 1997 at 4:00 p.m.
April 9, 1997 at 4:00 p.m.
April.23, 1997 at 4:00 p.m.
May 14, 1997 at 4:00 p.m.
June 11, 1997 at 4:00 p.m.
July 23, 1997 at 4:00 p.m.
August 27, 1997 at 4:00 p.m.
September 10, 1997 at 4:00 p.m.
September 24, 1997 at 4:00 p.m.
October 8, 1997 at 4:00 p.m.
October 22, 1997 at 4:00 p.m.
November 12, 1997 at 4:00 p.m.
**November 25, 1997 at 4:00 p.m.
December 10, 1997 at 4:00 p.m.
**Due to Thanksgiving Holiday
Vote: Unanimous
On motion of Mr. Daniel, seconded by Mr. Barber, the Board
suspended its rules at this time to add an amendment to the
Procedures of the Board of Supervisors for 1997.
Vote: Unanimous
1/8/97
97-5
On motion of Mr. Daniel, seconded by Mr. Barber, the Board
amended the Procedures of the Board of Supervisors for 1997 to
provide that no new Agenda Item would be considered after 11:00
p.m. during Board meetings without unanimous consensus of the
Board.
Vote: Unanimous
2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
On motion of Mr. Barber, seconded by Mr. McHale, the Board
approved the minutes of December 18, 1996, as submitted.
Vote: Unanimous
3. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS
Mr. Ramsey recognized Mr. Stegmaier and Budget and Management
staff for receiving the Distinguished Budget Presentation Award
from the national Government Finance Officers Association of the
United States and Canada (GFOA) Award. He noted this was the
thirteenth conseCutive year that Chesterfield has won this
Award. He commended Mr. Stegmaier and staff for receiving this
Award.
4. BOARD COMMITTEE REPORTS
Mr. Barber stated that his last "First Monday" meeting was held
January 6, 1997 with Mrs. DeHart, Delegate John Watkins, and
Senator Jack Reid being his guest speakers with the topic of
discussion being upcoming issues to be addressed at the General
Assembly that may affect Chesterfield County and the State of
Virginia. He further stated that he is serving on a study
commission of the General Assembly entitled, "The Commission on
the Future of Public Education". He stated that the
Commission's charge is to look at all innovations and
suggestions that have been brought forward on public education
in Virginia and that the Commission is looking at ways to
improve education in Virginia.
Mrs. Humphrey stated that her last constituents meeting was held
December 3, 1996 with Secretary of Public Safety Jerry Kilgore,
who has recently resigned to run for Attorney General, and the
members of the Domestic Violence Intervention Project being the
guest speakers. She further stated that the meeting had a
tremendous impact on those attending and suggested that the
members of the Domestic Violence Intervention Project may be
able to attend other District constituent meetings to share
their experiences and what they are doing on behalf of the
residents of Chesterfield County.
Mr. McHale stated that over the months before the upcoming
Budget is adopted, his constituents meetings will be featuring
Bermuda representatives from various Boards and Commissions on
the actions of their Board and budget issues that they are
facing.
Mr. Warren stated that his last constituents meeting was held
December 6, 1996 with Mr. Jay Rafler, General Manager of
Cloverleaf Mall, and Captain John Austin, with the County's
Police Department, being the guest speakers with the topic of
discussion being the security and safety at the Mall and the
area's corridor. He further stated that he held the first
session of Chesterfield Matters on January 7, 1997 with his
guest speakers being State Senator Stephen Martin and Delegate
Samuel Nixon with the topic of discussion being 1996
accomplishments in the General Assembly and goals and issues
coming before the Assembly in 1997.
1/8/97
97-6
Se
REQUESTS TO POSTPONE ACTION, ADDITIONS, OR CHANGES IN THE
ORDER OF PRESENTATION
On motion of Mr. McHale, seconded by Mr. Barber, the Board added
Item 9.B.13., Adoption of Resolution Supporting Appointment of
Local Officials to State Committees and Commissions, to follow
Item 9.B.12., Set Date for Public Hearing to Consider an
Ordinance to Amend the Code of the County of Chesterfield, 1978,
as Amended, by Amending and Reenacting Section 8-12 Relating to
Fees Imposed for Collecting Delinquent Taxes; added Item
9.B.14., Approval of Reallocation in Community Development Block
Grant Funds, Appropriation of FY96 Designation of General Fund
Balance, Transfer of Funds from the Debt Service Center, and
Approval of Funding for the Replacement of Athletic Track at
Virginia State University to following 9.B.13.; and replaced
Item 16.D., Public Hearing to Consider Appropriation of 1997
Bond Proceeds and Interest Earnings for School and County
Capital Projects and Issuance Expenses, Adoption of Resolution
Authorizing Issuance of General Obligation Bonds, and Adoption
of Resolution Approving the Preliminary Official Statement for
the Bond Issue and, adopted the Agenda, as amended.
Vote: Unanimous
6. RESOLUTIONS AND SPECIAL RECOGNITIONS
There were no Resolutions and Special Recognitions at this time.
7. WORK SESSIONS
O REGARDING THE CENTRAL AREA PLAN
Mr. Jacobson stated that the Central Area is a solid, livable
community that has room to grow, primarily, in the southern and
western areas. He further stated that the principal issue for
this maturing, suburban area is to preserve and maintain the
area as the stable, healthy suburban community that it is today.
He stated that the major goals for the Central Area Plan are to
maintain the long-term vitality and attractiveness of the
Central Area, preserve the strength and character of this areas
diverse neighborhoods, and accommodate new development within a
planned and functional framework with special recognition of the
County Airport as a development anchor and irreplaceable asset.
He presented an overview of staff's original proposed Plan and
noted that staff intends to increase the amount of planned light
industrial area in the vicinity of the Airport by approximately
1,400 acres. He then presented an overview of a map showing a
detail of the area around the Airport. He stated that staff
continues to recommend light industrial uses in the area north
of Cogbill Road and to the east of Belmont Road -- the Planning
Commission is recommending residential for these areas.
There was brief discussion relative to the difference in staff's
recommendation and the Planning Commission regarding the Plan
being that staff recommends light industrial and the Planning
Commission recommends residential in an area between Cogbill and
Belmont Roads.
Mr. Jacobson introduced Ms. Barbara Fassett, Community Planner
of the Planning Department, to present the Community
Initiatives, primarily, for the northern part of the study
areas.
Mrs. Humphrey excused herself from the meeting.
1/8/97
97-7
Ms. Fassett presented an overview of the Community Initiatives
in the Central Area Plan including the .Meadowbrook Area
Community being the County's first Community Initiative.
Mrs. Humphrey returned to the meeting.
Ms. Fassett reviewed the Community Initiative recommendations
including community identity; community schools; community
beautification; and County organization.
Mr. Barber stated that he hopes community~ wellness is an issue
that continues to generate interest on the part of the
neighborhoods, however, if the interest is not generated or does
not continue, he hopes this initiative will not become a County
function.
Ms. Fassett continued to review Community Initiative
recommendations including the property maintenance program. She
then introduced Mr. Bill Dupler to review the Neighborhood
Property Maintenance Code Enforcement Program relating to
single-family residential rental inspections.
Mr. Dupler presented an overview of the Neighborhood Property
Maintenance Code Enforcement Program for the County that was
basically generated by the Central Area Plan. He stated that
the Planning Commission's recommendations included proactive
neighborhood strategy and rental housing code enforcement
strategy and noted that this Program is not intended to be
limited only to rental property and that the County has the
authority to support this activity by charging a fee. He then
reviewed the annual inspections/biennial inspections program.
When asked, he stated that the rental properties in the areas of
Walmsley Boulevard to the 360 Corridor and Belmont Road up to
Turner Road would not be included in this Program. He stated
that the total annual recurring costs to the County would be
approximately $201,998 and first year start-up costs would be
approximately $65,500.
There was brief discussion relative the first year's cost
estimates being conservative; the mechanism in place to collect
the fees for the inspection; and
Mr. Barber expressed concerns relative to local government
making the assumption that it must make something right when
there necessarily has not been a problem. He stated that he
feels it is the owners and renters responsibility to correct any
problems to property.
There was brief discussion relative to many citizens expressing
their concerns that rental properties are not being maintained
as well as owner-occupied properties.
Mr. Daniel stated that most of the information that has been
presented had come from County citizens through many meetings.
He further stated that he feels a lot of thought needs to go
into this issue and that the public is only looking for a way to
ensure their neighborhood will not go into a state a despair.
Mr. McHale stated that there is a lot of concern that rental
property does not get the care that a resident owner gives and
that the result is a state of deterioration of property. He
further stated that the County will have a major portion of its
housing stock hitting twenty years of age in the next five to
eight years and that he feels the Board needs to be proactive on
this issue. He commended staff for their efforts regarding this
issue.
97-8
1/8/97
Mr. Jacobson stated that seVeral County neighborhoods have
increased in the number of single-family rental homes. He
further stated that these type Programs are a key towards
maintaining and encouraging home ownership within County
neighborhoods.
Mr. Barber stated that this is a new service and a service with
a fee. He further stated that he feels as long as the County
continues to consider new services with fees, the Board needs to
include these fees into the equation of the County's tax items
coming up in the Budget.
Mr. McHale stated that he feels this Program may not be
sufficient. He further stated that he feels as the County grows
and housing stock gets older, a lot of attention needs to be
focused on the homes in the County being maintained at Code. He
stated that a building inspection at sale is one way to ensure
homes are maintained at Code. He further stated that he feels
there is a potential for more rapid deterioration with homes now
being built and that if this Board does not address the issue
now, it will be put in the hands of a future governing body. He
further stated that these are the types of services that should
be paid for by the receivers of the services, regardless if they
want the service or not.
Mrs. Humphrey requested staff to show a land use map displaying
Virginia Power lines before the public hearing begin this
evening on the Central Area Plan.
Mr. Daniel requested staff to also mark the location of the
power lines in the area of Heritage Baptist on the new map.
8. DEFERRED ITEMS
There were no Deferred Items at this time.
9. NEW BUSINESS
9.A. NON-STANDARD STREETLIGHT INSTALLATION COST APPROVALS
On motion of Mr. McHale, seconded by Mr. Barber, the Board
approved the following non-standard streetlight installation
cost approval in the Bermuda Magisterial District:
Installation of sixteen decorative acorn-style 8000 lumen
streetlights
No cost to install lights
Additional annual cost of electrical service to the County:
$1,614.72 per year for both subdivisions
Vote: Unanimous
9.B. CONSENT ITEMS
9.B.1. TRANSFER OF BERMUDA DISTRICT THREE CENT ROAD FUNDS FO~
THE INSTALLATION OF TWO "NO DUMPING" SIGNS AT THE
TERMINUS OF SHOP STREET
On motion of Mr. McHale, seconded by Mr. Barber, the Board
transferred $100 from the Bermuda District Three Cent Road Fund
to the Environmental Engineering Department for the installation
of two "No Dumping" signs at the terminus of Shop Street.
Vote: Unanimous
1/8/97
97-9
9.B.2. APPROVAL OF FY97 NEW SCHOOL BOARD GRANTS
On motion of Mr. McHale, seconded by Mr. Barber, the Board
increased estimated State revenue by $12,000, Federal revenue by
$19,340, local revenue by $165,000; increased the transfer from
the School Operating Fund by $30,000; and increased the
Instruction appropriation category in the School Grants Fund by
$61,505.
Vote: Unanimous
9.B.3. APPROVAL OF FY97 REVISED SC]~OOL BOARD GRANTS
On motion of Mr. McHale, seconded by Mr. Barber, the Board
increased estimated State revenue by $14,663 and estimated
Federal revenue by $195,304; decreased local revenue by $3,475;
and increased appropriations of Instruction by $199,692 and
Administration/ Attendance & Health appropriations by $6,800 in
the School Grants Fund.
Vote: Unanimous
9.B.4. APPROVAL OF AGREEMENT FOR COUNTY ASSISTANCE TO PROVIDE
WATER SERVICE TO POCAHONTAS STATE PARK
On motion of Mr. McHale, seconded by Mr. Barber, the Board
approved an agreement with the Department of Conservation and
Recreation to provide water service to Pocahontas State Park.
Vote: Unanimous
9.B.5. STATE ROAD ACCEPTANCE
This day the County Environmental Engineer, in accordance with
directions from this Board, made report in writing upon his
examination of the roads in Foxcroft, Section IV, Matoaca
District, and
Whereas, the Resident Engineer for the Virginia Department of
Transportation has advised the ]Director of Environmental
Engineering, the street(s) in Foxcroft, Section IV, Matoaca
District, meet the requirements established by the Subdivision
Street Requirements of the Virginia Department of
Transportation, and
Whereas, the County and the Virginia Department of
Transportation have entered into an agreement, recorded in Deed
Book 2453, Page 405, January 21, 1994, for all stormwater
detention/retention facilities in the County.
Therefore, upon consideration whereof, and on motion of Mr.
McHale, seconded by Mr. Barber, it is resolved that the roads in
Foxcroft, Section IV, Matoaca District, be and they hereby are
established as public roads.
And be it further resolved, that 'the Virginia Department of
Transportation, be and is hereby requested to take into the
Secondary System, pursuant to Section 33.1-229, Code of
Virginia, and the Department's Subdivision Street Requirements,
the following:
Name of Street: Houndmaster Road
From: Fox Club Parkway, State
Route 5201, 0.08 mile east
of Fox Briar Road, State Route 5202
Length: 0.12 mile
97-10
1/8/97
To: End of section limits, 0.12 mile
north of Fox Club Parkway, State Route 5201
Guaranteed Right-of-Way Width: 50 feet.
Name of Street: Houndmaster Terrace Length: 0.09 mile
From: End of cul-de-sac, 0.09 mile
west of Houndmaster Road
To: Houndmaster Road, 0.11 mile
north of Fox Club Parkway, State Route 5201
Guaranteed Right-of-Way Width: 50 feet.
Name of Street: Houndmaster Circle Length: 0.04 mile
From: Houndmaster Road, 0.11 mile
north of Fox Club Parkway, State Route 5201
To: End of cul-de-sac, 0.04 mile
east of Houndmaster Road
Guaranteed Right-of-Way Width: 50 feet.
This request is inclusive of the adjacent slope, sight distance,
clear zone and designated Virginia Department of Transportation
drainage easements indicated on the development plat.
These roads serve 25 lots.
This section of Foxcroft is recorded as follows:
Section IV, Plat Book 79, Pages 97 and 98, December 30, 1992.
This day the County Environmental Engineer, in accordance with
directions from this Board, made report in writing upon his
examination of the roads in Foxcroft, Section V, Matoaca
District, and
Whereas, the Resident Engineer for the Virginia Department of
Transportation has advised the Director of Environmental
Engineering, the street(s) in Foxcroft, Section V, Matoaca
District, meet the requirements established by the Subdivision
Street Requirements of the Virginia Department of
Transportation, and
Whereas, the County and the Virginia Department of
Transportation have entered into an agreement, recorded in Deed
Book 2453, Page 405, January 21, 1994, for all stormwater
detention/retention facilities in the County.
Therefore, upon consideration whereof, and on motion of Mr.
McHale, seconded by Mr. Barber, it is resolved that the roads in
Foxcroft, Section V, Matoaca District, be and they hereby are
established as public roads.
And be it further resolved, that the Virginia Department of
Transportation, be and is hereby requested to take into the
Secondary System, pursuant to Section 33.1-229, Code of
Virginia, and the Department's Subdivision Street Requirements,
the following:
Name of Street: Houndmaster Road
From: End of section limits,
0.12 mile north of Fox Club Parkway,
State Route 5201
To: End of cul-de-sac, 0.34 mile from
Fox Club Parkway, State Route 5201
Guaranteed Right-of-Way Width: 50 feet.
Length: 0.22 mile
Name of Street: Foxvale Way Length: 0.10 mile
From: Houndmaster Road, 0.20 mile
north of Fox Club Parkway, State Route 5201
1/8/97
97-11
To: End of cul-de-sac, 0.10 mile east
of Houndmaster Road
Guaranteed Right-of-Way Width: 50 feet.
This request is inclusive of the adjacent slope, sight distance,
clear zone and designated Virginia Department of Transportation
drainage easements indicated on the development plat.
These roads serve 30 lots.
This section of Foxcroft is recorded as follows:
Section V, Plat Book 83, Page 11, January 5, 1994.
Vote: Unanimous
This day the County Environmental Engineer, in accordance with
directions from this Board, made report in writing upon his
examination of the roads in Timbermill North, Matoaca District,
and
Whereas, the Resident Engineer for the Virginia Department of
Transportation has advised the Director of Environmental
Engineering, the street(s) in Timbermill North, Matoaca
District, meet the requirements established by the Subdivision
Street Requirements of the Virginia Department of
Transportation, and
Whereas, the County and the Virginia Department of
Transportation have entered into an agreement, recorded in Deed
Book 2453, Page 405, January 21, 1994, for all stormwater
detention/retention facilities in the County.
Therefore, upon consideration whereof, and on motion of Mr.
McHale, seconded by Mr. Barber, it is resolved that the roads in
Timbermill North, Matoaca District, be and they hereby are
established as public roads.
And be it further resolved, that the Virginia Department of
Transportation, be and is hereby requested to take into the
Secondary System, pursuant to Section 33.1-229, Code of
Virginia, and the Department's Subdivision Street Requirements,
the following:
Name of Street: Timbernorth Trail
From: Existing Timbernorth Trail,
State Route 4364, 0.03 mile
north of Timber Trail Drive,
State Route 4360
To: Cul-de-sac, 0.15 mile north
of Timber Trail Drive, State Route 4360
Guaranteed Right-of-Way Width: 50 feet.
Length: 0.12 mile
Name of Street: Timbernorth Court Length: 0.03 mile
From: Timbernorth Trail, 0.06 mile
north of Timber Trail Drive,
State Route 4360
To: Cul-de-sac, 0.03 mile west of Timbernorth Trail
Guaranteed Right-of-Way Width: 50 feet.
This request is inclusive of the adjacent slope, sight distance,
clear zone and designated Virginia Department of Transportation
drainage easements indicated on the development plat.
These roads serve 17 lots.
97-12
1/8/97
, /
This section of Timbermill North is recorded as follows:
Plat Book 83, Pages 85 and 86, March 2, 1994.
Vote: Unanimous
9.B.6. INITIATION OF ADMINISTRATIVE VARIANCE FOR PROPERTY ON
RUTHERS ROAD
On motion of Mr. McHale, seconded by Mr. Barber, the Board
initiated an administrative variance for property at 722 Ruthers
Road.
Vote: Unanimous
9.B.7. AWARD OF CONTRACT TO AUSTIN BROCKENBROUGH AND
ASSOCIATES; JOHNSON, MIRMIRAN THOMPSON; RUST
ENVIRONMENT AND INFRASTRUCTURE; SITE-BLAUVELT ENGINEERS,
INCORPORATED; AND TIMMONS FOR ANNUAL ENGINEERING
SERVICES
On motion of Mr. McHale, seconded by Mr. Barber, the Board
authorized the County Administrator to execute a contract with
Austin Brockenbrough and Associates; Johnson, Mirmiran Thompson;
Rust Environment and Infrastructure; Site-Blauvelt Engineers,
Incorporated; and Timmons for annual engineering services to
meet the engineering needs of the Transportation Department.
(It is noted the contract shall be effective through January 8,
2000 and renewable for two one year terms.)
Vote: Unanimous
9.B.8. ACCEPTANCE OF A PARCEL OF LAND ALONG BUFORD ROAD FROM
BUFORD ROAD BAPTIST CHURCH
On motion of Mr. McHale, seconded by Mr. Barber, the Board
accepted, on behalf of the County, the conveyance of a parcel of
land containing 0.0015 acres along Buford Road from Buford Road
Baptist Church and authorized the County Administrator to
execute the necessary deed. (It is noted a copy of the plat is
filed with the papers of this Board.)
Vote: Unanimous
9.B.9.
REQUEST TO QUITCLAIM A PORTION OF AN EXISTING SIXTEEN
FOOT WATER EASEMENT ACROSS PROPERTY OF MEADOWDALE REALTY
On motion of Mr. McHale, seconded by Mr. Barber, the Board
authorized the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors and the
County Administrator to execute a quitclaim deed to vacate a
portion of an existing sixteen foot water easement across
property of Meadowdale Realty, LLC. (It is noted a copy of the
plat is filed with the papers of this Board.)
Vote: Unanimous
1/8/97
97-13
9.B.10. REQUESTS FOR PERi
9.B.10.a. FROM MOUNT PIS,
4ISSION
~AH UNITED METHODIS~ CHURCH TO
CONSTRUCT CONCi~ETE CURB AND GUTTER AND A CONCRETE
SIDEWALK WITHIi AN EXISTING SIXTEEN FOOT SEWER
EASEMENT, A TW~
FOOT WATER EAS
On motion of Mr. McHale,
approved a request from Mc
NTY FOOT SEWER EASEMENT, AND A SIXTEEN
~MENT
seconded by Mr. Barber, the Board
.unt Pisgah United MEthodist Church to
construct a concrete curt and gutter and a iconcrete sidewalk
within an existing sixteeln foot sewer easement, a twenty foot
sewer easement, and a sixteen foot water easement, subject to
the execution of a license agreement. (It is noted a copy of
the vicinity sketch is filed with the papers of this Board.)
Vote: Unanimous
9.B.10.b. FROM CHRONOS F~R A PORTION OF A S~DEWALK AND AWNING
TO ENCROACH WI'~HIN AN EXISTING SIXTEEN FOOT WATER
EASEMENT
On motion of Mr. McHale, seconded by Mr. Barber, the Board
approved a request from C~.ronos, L.C. to construct a portion of
a sidewalk and awning to encroach within an existing sixteen
foot water easement, sukject to tlhe execution of a license
agreement. (It is noted~copy of the vicinity sketch is filed
with the papers of this
B0ard~
Vote: Unanimous
9.B.11. CONVEYANCE OF EASEMENT TO VIRGINIA E~ECTRIC AND POWER
COMPANY TO INSTALL UNDERGROUND POWER LINES TO PROVIDE
BACKUP POWER FOR!THE POCONO WATER P~MP STATION
On motion of Mr. McHalel seconded by Mr. ~arber, the Board
authorized the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors and the
County Administrator to iexecute an easeme]lt agreement with
Virginia Electric and Power Company to instal] underground power
lines to provide backup po~er for the Pocono ~
(It is noted a copy of thel plat is filed with
Board.)
Vote: Unanimous
9.B.12. SET DATE FOR A PUBLIC HEARING TO CON
TO AMEND THE coDE OF THE COUNTY OF C
AS AMENDED, BY AMENDING AND REENACT
RELATING TO FEES IMPOSED FOR COLLEC
TAXES
On motion of Mr. McHale, seconded by Mr. Bar
the date of February 26, 1997 for a public h
an ordinance to amend the Code of the Count~
1978, as amended, by amending and reenacI
relating to fees imposed for collecting deli
ater Pump Station.
the papers of this
SIDER AN ORDINANCE
HESTERFIELD, 1978~
SECTION 8-12
~ING DELINQUENT
Uer, the Board set
~aring to consider
; of Chesterfield,
~ing Section 8-12
nquent taxes.
Vote: Unanimous
1/8/97
97-14
9.B.13. ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION SUPPORTING APPOINTMENT
OF LOCAL OFFICIALS TO STATE COMMITTEES AND
COMMISSIONS
On motion of Mr. McHale, seconded by Mr. Barber, the Board
adopted the following resolution:
WHEREAS, the provision of basic services to the citizens
of this Commonwealth is a function and obligation of local
government; and
WHEREAS, the citizens of this Commonwealth hold their
local governments responsible for basic services and hold an
expectation of responsive attention to their needs by their
local governments; and
WHEREAS, the citizens of this Commonwealth elect
representatives to local governing bodies whom they expect to
carry out the wishes of the community in a fiscally sound,
efficient, and effective manner; and
WHEREAS, the local elected officials and their appointed
management directors take very seriously this mandate from the
public to provide for the needs of the community and ultimately
are held responsible for the provision of services to the
citizens; and
WHEREAS, local government is the government closest to the
people; and
WHEREAS, changes made at the State level which alter or
restrict the method of providing basic community services or
which alter, reduce, or eliminate the ability of a local
government to obtain the revenue necessary to provide basic
services to its citizens are decisions which should not be made
without full and thorough consultation with the local
governments impacted by such decisions; and
WHEREAS, the provision of basic services at the local
level and the revenue resources available to the local
government as well as the need for these services and revenues
vary greatly from region to region and from locality to
locality; and
WHEREAS, the local elected officials and their managerial
staffs have greater expertise and knowledge to provide insight
into the needs and financial activities of their own specific
communities than State officials or local officials from other
parts of the State.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, by the Chesterfield County
Board of Supervisors that the Governor of Virginia and the
General Assembly of Virginia be requested to appoint to all
committees and commissions dealing with the provision of
services or the revenue resources of local governments
sufficient numbers of local elected officials and/or local
government managerial staff persons to adequately relate to the
committee or commission the true impact on our community of any
and all decisions contemplated by that committee or commission.
AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that copies of this
resolution be provided to the Governor of Virginia and the
members of the General Assembly who represent our locality.
Vote: Unanimous
1/8/97
97-15
9.B.14. APPROVAL OF REALi4OC~TION OF CO,UNITY DEVELOPMENT
BLOCK GRANT FUNDi[NG, APPROPRIATION OF FY96
DESIGNATION OF Gi~NERAL FUND BALANCEt TRANSFER OF
On motion of Mr. McHale,i seconded by Mr. Barber, the Board
approved the reallocation of $76,325 in Com~nity Development
Block Grant Funds; appropriated FY96 Designation of General Fund
Balance, in the amount ofi$22,000; transferred $1,675 from the
Debt Service Center; and ~pproved the increase in expenditures
of $100,000 in General Fu~d dollars for a replacement track at
Virginia State University~
Vote: Unanimous
10. HEARINGS OF CITIZENS ON UNSCHEDULED ~T~?ERS OR CLAIMS
There were no Hearings of citizens on Unscb
Claims.
11. REPORTS
On motion of Mr. McHale,i seconded by Mr.
accepted the following reports:
A report on Developer Waker and Sewer Contr
report on the General Fund Balance; Reserve
Projects; District Road and Street Light
Purchases.
Vote: Unanimous
12. DINNER
On motion of Mr. McHale, seconded by Mr.
recessed to the Administration Building, Roo
Vote: Unanimous
13. INVOCATION
Bishop George Weegar, with the Church of Jesu
Day Saints, gave the invocation.
14. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE! TO THE FLAG OF THE
AMERICA
Members of Boy Scout Troop 826 led the Pledg
the Flag of the United States of America.
15. RESOLUTIONS AND SPECIAL RECOGNITIONS
15.B. RECOGNIZING MS. GW
DRUMMOND, MS. MELI
MS. CYNTHIA CLARK
DEPARTMENT OF PUBI
Mr. Kappel introduced Ms
Sean Drummond, Ms. Melis:
Ms. Cynthia Clark who we~
eduled Matters or
~arren, the Board
acts and a status
~or Future Capital
Funds; and Lease
~arren, the Board
502, for dinner.
Christ of latter
UNITED STATES OF
~ of Allegiance to
~N SADLER, MS. DAIS~ PRIDGEN, MR. SEAN
~SA WILFONG, MS. DEBORAH HOGSHEAD,
FOR THEIR VOLUNTEER EFFORTS IN THE
IC AFFAIRS
Gwen Sadler, Ms. Daisy Pridgen, Mr.
~a Wilfong., Ms. DebOrah Hogshead, and
e present to accept the resolutions.
97-16
1/8/97
On motion of the Board, the following resolution was adopted:
WHEREAS, the November, 1996 Chesterfield County Bond
Referendum was of vital and far-reaching importance to the
citizens of Chesterfield County; and
WHEREAS, the Public Affairs Department staff needed to
focus on a major communications effort to provide citizens with
the information they needed to make an informed vote; and
WHEREAS, assistance was needed to continue with many
routine, but important public affairs tasks; and
WHEREAS, the Public Affairs Department advertised for
qualified volunteers to assist with taking photographs, writing
articles, performing research, and other tasks; and
WHEREAS, six volunteers particularly distinguished
themselves through diligence, selfless dedication, and high-
quality, professional work; and
WHEREAS, it is appropriate to express the County's
gratitude for that service.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Chesterfield Board
of Supervisors expresses its appreciation to Ms. Gwen Sadler,
Ms. Daisy Pridgen, Mr. Sean Drummond, Ms. Melissa Wilfong, Ms.
Deborah Hogshead, and Ms. Cynthia Clark for their volunteer
efforts in the Department of Public Affairs.
AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that a resolution be
presented Ms. Sadler, Ms. Pridgen, Mr. Drummond, Ms. Wilfong,
Ms. Hogshead, and Ms. Clark and that this resolution be
permanently recorded among the papers of this Board of
Supervisors of Chesterfield County, Virginia.
Vote: Unanimous
Mr. Warren presented the executed resolutions to Ms. Sadler, Ms.
Pridgen, Mr. Drummond, Ms. Wilfong, Ms. Hogshead, and Ms. Clark
and expressed appreciation for their volunteers efforts in the
Public Affairs Department.
15.C. RECOGNIZING BOY SCOUTS UPON ATTAINING RANK OF EAGLE
15.C.1. MR. JOHN G. CASBEER, TROOP 826
On motion of the Board, the following resolution was adopted:
WHEREAS, the Boy Scouts of America was incorporated by Mr.
William D. Boyce on February 8, 1910; and
WHEREAS, the Boy Scouts of America was founded to promote
citizenship training, personal development, and fitness of
individuals; and
WHEREAS, after earning at least twenty-one merit badges
in a wide variety of fields, serving in a leadership position in
a troop, carrying out a service project beneficial to his
community, being active in the troop, demonstrating Scout
spirit, and living up to the Scout Oath and Law; and
WHEREAS, Mr. John G. Casbeer, Troop 826, sponsored by The
Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints, has accomplished
those high standards of commitment and has reached the long-
sought goal of Eagle Scout which is received by less than two
percent of those individuals entering the Scouting movement; and
1/8/97
97-17
WHEREAS, growing t
learning the lessons of
himself on the great acc
indeed a member of a new ~
of whom we can all be ver'
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that
County Board of Supervisors hereby extends i'
to Mr. John G. Casbeer and acknowledges the g
County to have such an )utstanding young ~
citizens.
Vote: Unanimous
~rough his experiel]ces in Scouting,
~esponsible citizenship, and priding
omplishments of hi~ County, John is
eneration of prepa~ed young citizens
proud.
the Chesterfield
2s congratulations
~od fortune of the
~an as one of its
Mrs. Humphrey presented tt~e executed resolution to Mr. Casbeer,
accompanied by members of his family, congratulated him on his
outstanding achievements,l and wished him w~ll in his future
endeavors. ' '
15.C.2. MR. DANIEL B. GARRISON, TROOP 826
On motion of the Board, the following resolu
WHEREAS, the Boy ScOuts of America was
William D. Boyce on February 8, 1910; and
WHEREAS, the Boy Scouts of America was
citizenship training, personal development
individuals; and
WHEREAS, after ear!
in a wide variety of field
a troop, carrying out ~
community, being active
spirit, and living up to
ling at least twent
s, serving in a lea~
service project
in the troop, ds
the Scout Oath and
5ion was adopted:
ncorporated by Mr.
founded to promote
and fitness of
~-one merit badges
'ership position in
~eneficial to his
monstrating Scout
Law; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Danie~ B. Garrison, Troop 826, sponsored by
The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter ! Day Saints, has
accomplished those high standards of commitment and has reached
the long-sought goal of Eagle Scout which i~ received by less
than two percent of those individuals entering the Scouting
movement; and
WHEREAS, growing through his experiences in Scouting,
learning the lessons of iresponsible citize~ship, and priding
himself on the great accomplishments of his County, Daniel is
indeed a member of a new generation of prepared young citizens
of whom we can all be very~ proud.
NOW, THEREFORE BEi IT RESOLVED, that the Chesterfield
County Board of Supervisolrs hereby extends its congratulations
to Mr. Daniel B. Garriso~ and acknowledges the good fortune of
the County to have such ain outstanding young man as one of its
citizens.
Vote: Unanimous
Mrs. Humphrey presented the executed resoluti.)n to Mr. Garrison,
accompanied by members of his family, congratulated him on his
outstanding achievements and wished him well in his future
endeavors.
97-18
1/8/97
15.C.3. MR. NICHOLAS ELI WOOD, TROOP 826
On motion of the Board, the following resolution was adopted:
WHEREAS, the Boy Scouts of America was incorporated by Mr.
William D. Boyce on February 8, 1910; and
WHEREAS, the Boy Scouts of America was founded to promote
citizenship training, personal development, and fitness of
individuals; and
WHEREAS, after earning at least twenty-one merit badges
in a wide variety of fields, serving in a leadership position in
a troop, carrying out a service project' beneficial to his
community, being active in the troop, demonstrating Scout
spirit, and living up to the Scout Oath and Law; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Nicholas Eli Wood, Troop 826, sponsored by
The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints, has
accomplished those high standards of commitment and has reached
the long-sought goal of Eagle Scout which is received by less
than two percent of those individuals entering the Scouting
movement; and
WHEREAS, growing through his experiences in Scouting,
learning the lessons of responsible citizenship, and priding
himself on the great accomplishments of his County, Nicholas is
indeed a member of a new generation of prepared young citizens
of whom we can all be very proud.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Chesterfield
County Board of Supervisors hereby extends its congratulations
to Mr. Nicholas Eli Wood and acknowledges the good fortune of
the County to have such an outstanding young man as one of its
citizens.
Vote: Unanimous
Mrs. Humphrey presented the executed resolution to Mr. Wood,
accompanied by members of his family, congratulated him on his
outstanding achievements, and wished him well in his future
endeavors.
15.C.4. MR. JASON NEIL SPIVEY, TROOP 855
On motion of the Board, the following resolution was adopted:
WHEREAS, the Boy Scouts of America was incorporated by Mr.
William D. Boyce on February 8, 1910; and
WHEREAS, the Boy Scouts of America was founded to promote
citizenship training, personal development, and fitness of
individuals; and
WHEREAS, after earning at least twenty-one merit badges
in a wide variety of fields, serving in a leadership position in
a troop, carrying out a service project beneficial to his
community, being active in the troop, demonstrating Scout
spirit, and living up to the Scout Oath and Law; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Jason Neil Spivey, Troop 855, sponsored by
The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints, has
accomplished those high standards of commitment and has reached
the long-sought goal of Eagle Scout which is received by less
than two percent of those individuals entering the Scouting
movement; and
97-19
1/8/97
WHEREAS, growing t
learning the lessons of
himself on the great acc~
indeed a member of a new t
of whom we can all be ver'
NOW, THEREFORE BE
County Board of Superviso
to Mr. Jason Neil Spivey and acknowledges t~e good
the County to have such ali outstanding youn~man as
citizens.
Vote: Unanimous
(It is noted that Mr. Spi'
therefore, staff will for~
15.A. RECOGNIZING ICI PO2
RECIPIENT OF THE "~
APPRECIATION AND Ri COGNITION AWARD"
Mr. McLaren introduced
Engineering Director, and
ICI Polyester, who was pre~
On motion of the Board, t]~e following resolu~
WHEREAS, the Chesterfield County Boa~
established a Business Appreciation and Rec
recognize existing businesses within the Coun
to the County's economy and its citizens; an~
nrough his experiences in Scouting,
~esponsible citizenship, and priding
~mplishments of his County, Jason is
eneration of prepa]~ed young citizens
proud.
IT RESOLVED, that' the Chesterfield
?s hereby extends i~s congratulations
fortune of
one of its
!
;ey was unable to attend the meeting,
~ard the resolution to him.)
~YESTER AS THE 1996 LARGE BUSINESS
~HESTERFIELD COUNTY~BUSI~ESS
WHEREAS, ICI Polyes
Chesterfield County in 199
230 employees in 1972 to
exceeding $34 million; an~
WHEREAS, ICI Polyes~ er is the leading ms
types and thicknesses of 5he polyester film
WHEREAS, productio~ at ICI Polyester i
15.6 million pounds of polyester fillm in 1973
million pounds in 1995; the Chesterfield s
polyester polymer production plant, a film
related support facilitieS; and major expansi¢
in 1978, 1980, 1982, 1984i, and 1988; and
WHEREAS, ICI Polyester is a staunch
Chesterfield County community through their
charitable organization~ such as the
Association, the American.~eart Association,
as well as emergency services, particularly
Volunteer Fire Department and Bensley Bermud~
Services; and
WHEREAS, ICI Poly
commitment to educational
closely with John Tyler C
Technical Center with
technological background
WHEREAS, ICI Poly~
House for citizens, custo~
to visit and tour tb
understanding and goodwi
~. Peter Neuschul, IManufacturing and
Mr. Jeff Adams, PIoject Director of
~ent to accept the r~solution. Neuschul
~ion was adopted:
?d of Supervisors
ognition Award to
ty that contribute
ter observed its 2Z th anniversary in
6 and has increased in employment from
630 in 1996 with 'an annual payroll
~ster continues t¢
institutions in th~
ommunity College an
the goal of buii[ding
for students; and
nufacturer of many
MELINEX; and
as increased from
to a high of 125.8
itc consists of a
duction plant, and
~s were undertaken
supporter of the
involvement with
American Cancer
nd the United Way,
through the Enon
Emergency Medical
demonstrate its
County by working
the Chesterfield
a stronger
ster has initiatedl a Bi-annual Open
hers, government officials, and others
e ICI facility thereby improving
1 to the benefit of all; and
1/8/97
97-20
WHEREAS, ICI Polyester is a local leader in environmental
solutions which have included a significant increase in
recycling, reduction in waste through continuous process
improvements, and a reduction in air emissions and the company
also works with the Chesterfield County Riverfront Project
Committee to ensure the most advanced habitat preservation
methods are being used.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Chesterfield
County Board of Supervisors hereby expresses its gratitude, on
behalf of the County, to ICI Polyester for their many
contributions.
AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors
publicly recognizes ICI Polyester as the 1996 Large Business
Recipient of the "Chesterfield County Business Appreciation and
Recognition Award".
Vote: Unanimous
Mr. McHale presented the executed resolution to Mr. Neuschul and
Mr. Adams, congratulated them on their outstanding
accomplishments, expressed appreciation for their many
contributions to Chesterfield County, and wished them continued
success.
Mr. Neuschul expressed appreciation for the recognition.
16. PUBLIC HEARINGS
16.A. TO CONSIDER APPROPRIATION OF FY96 SCHOOL EXPENDITURE
Mr. Stegmaier stated that this date and time has been advertised
for a public hearing to consider appropriation $1,143,850 in
FY96 School expenditure savings.
No one came forward to speak in favor of or against this issue.
On motion of Mr. McHale, seconded by Mr. Barber, the Board
appropriated $1,143,850 in FY96 School expenditures savings for
non-recurring expenses in FY97 as follows: ($691,000 in the
School Operating Fund and $452,850 to the Reserve for School
Capital Projects in the General Fund).
Vote: Unanimous
~6.B. TO CONSIDER A CONVEYANCE OF AN APPROXIMATE 2.36 ACRE
PARCEL OF LAND IN THE AIRPORT INDUSTRIAL PARK TO COGHILT,
COMPOSITION COMPANY
Mr. Stith stated this date and time has been advertised for a
public hearing to consider a conveyance of an approximate 2.36
acre parcel of land in the Airport Industrial Park at $57,500
per acre to Coghill Composition Company.
No one came forward to speak in favor of or against this issue.
On motion of Mr. Daniel, seconded by Mr. McHale, the Board
authorized the County Administrator to enter into a sales
contract with Coghill Composition Company, approved as to form
by the County Attorney, and effect the sale of approximately
2.36 acres of land in the Airport Industrial Park at $57,500 per
acre to Coghill Composition Company.
Vote: Unanimous
1/8/97
97-21
16.C. TO CONSIDER AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE
OF CHESTERFIELD BY!AMENDING SECTIONS
229.12, 21.1-229.4, AND 21.1-229.6 RE]
DEVELOPMENT PHOSPHORUS LOADS, BOUNDAR~
ONE ADDITIONAL CLARIFICATION
Mr. Stith stated this datie and time has beer
public hearing to consider an ordinance
development phosphorus loads
additional clarification.I
No one came forward to !speak
ordinance.
~ODE OF THE COUNTY
1.1-229.11, 21.1-
~ATING TO POST-
ADJUSTMENTS, AND
. advertised for a
'elating to post-
boundary adjustments, and one
Mr. Warren stated that ~his ordinance will
affect on the County's drinking water.
Mr. Warren then made a motion, seconded by MI
Board to adopt the following ordinance:
AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE CODE OF T!
OF CHESTERFIELD, 1978, AS A_MENDED, B~
AND REENACTING SECTION 21.1-229.11 RI
ALLOWABLE POST-DEVELOPMENT PHOSPHOROU~
STORMWATER RUNOFF IN THE UPPER SWIFT CR]
BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Superviso
County:
(1) That Section 21.1-229.11 of
County of Chesterfield, 1978, as amended
reenacted to read as follows:
Sec. 21.1-229.11. Development regulations
Any use, development or redevelopment of 1~
performance criteria specified in this secti(
(a) No more land shall be disturbed than is ne
for the desired use or development.
(b) Indigenous vegetation shall be preserv(
extent possible consistent
(c) Land development shal
with the use or developmel
in favor of or against this
have a positive
McHale, for the
E COUNTY
~ AMENDING
~LATING TO
~ LOADS AND
~EK WATERSHED
rs of Chesterfield
the Code of the
is amended and
nd shall meet the
)n.
uessary to provide
~.d to the maximum
with the use and de?elopment allowed.
minimize imperiouS cover consistent
~t allowed..
(d) (1) For any use, dev(~lopment or redevel(
runoff shall be controlle, to achieve the
a. For any new use or development, the pos'
point-source pollution rllnoff loads of pho:
shall not exceed the foll.~wing:
(i) Phosphorus:
1. The post-development total pho~
nonresidential uses and residential uses at
than 2.2 units per acre
~pment, stormwater
_lowing:
z-development non-
~phorous and lead
;phorus load for
a density greater
located in areas identified for such
uses in The Plan for Ches
per acre per year.
2. The post-developmen
uses shall not exceed 0.4
(ii) Lead:
terfield shall notI exceed 0.45 pound
t total phosphorus load for all other
4 pound per acre per year.
97-22
1/8/97
1. The post-development total lead load for nonresidential
uses and residential uses at a density greater than 2.2 units
per acre located in areas identified for such uses in The Plan
for Chesterfield shall not exceed 0.19 pound per acre per year.
2. The post-development total lead load for all other uses
shall not exceed 0.03 pound per acre per year.
b. For redevelopment sites not currently served by water
quality best management practices, the existing non-point-source
pollution runoff loads of phosphorus and lead shall be reduced
by at least ten (10) percent after redevelopment; however, the
loads of such elements need not be reduced below the levels set
forth in subsection (d) (1)a above.
c. For redevelopment sites currently served by water quality
best management practices, the post-development non-point-
source pollution runoff loads of phosphorus and lead shall not
exceed the existing loads or the loads set forth in subsection
(d) (1)a above, whichever are greater.
(2) The following stormwater management options shall be
considered to comply with the requirements of subsection (d) (1):
a. Incorporation on the site of best management practices
that achieve the required control.
b. Compliance with a locally adopted regional stormwater
management program incorporating pro rata share payments
pursuant to the authority provided in Code of Virginia, section
15.1-466(j), that results in achievement of equivalent water
quality protection.
c. Compliance with a state or locally implemented program of
stormwater discharge permits pursuant to section 402(p) of the
federal Clean Water Act, as set forth in 40 CFR parts 122, 123,
124, and 504, dated December 7, 1988.
d. For a redevelopment site that is completely impervious as
currently developed, restoring a minimum of twenty (20) percent
of the site to vegetated open space.
(3) Any maintenance, alteration, use, or improvement to an
existing structure which does not degrade the quality of surface
water discharge, as determined by the director of environmental
engineering, may be exempted from the requirements of this
subsection. Any person aggrieved by a decision of the director
of environmental engineering under this subsection may appeal
such decision in accordance with the procedures provided in
section 21.1-275.
(e) Where the best management practices utilized require regular
or periodic maintenance in order to continue their functions,
such maintenance shall be ensured by a maintenance agreement,
bond or other assurance satisfactory to the director of
environmental engineering.
(f) Land upon which agricultural activities are being conducted
shall have a soil and water quality conservation plan. Such plan
shall be based upon the Field Office Technical Guide of the U.S.
Department of Agriculture Soil Conservation Service and
accomplish water quality protection consistent with this
section. Such a plan shall be approved by the James River Soil
and Water Conservation District by January 1, 1995.
(2) That this ordinance shall become effective immediately upon
adoption.
1/8/97
97-23
And, further, the Board al~opted the following resolution:
~MEND THE CODE OF THE COUNTY
L978, AS AMENDED, BY AMENDING
2TION 21.1--229.12 R~LATING TO
N THE UPPER SWIFT CREEK WATERSHED
BE IT ORDAINED By th Board of Supervisoirs of Chesterfield
County: 1
(1) That Section 21.1-229.12 of the Code of the
County of Chesterfield, 1978, as amended,l is amended and
AN ORDINANCE TO
OF CHESTERFIELD,
AND REENACTING SE
BOUNDARY ADJUSTMENTS I
reenacted to read as foll,
Sec. 21.1-229.12. Supplem~
apDl¥
)ws:
.~ntal requ:[ations; more restrictive
(a) Boundary adjustment: , as provided for in Section 21.1-
229.4, shall not be litted in the Upper Swift Creek
Watershed. The director f environmental engineering shall not
grant an exception to this provision,, provided, however, that an
applicant may seek reli,~f from this prov±sion pursuant to
Section 21.1-12.1.
(b) The regulations for t
serve as a supplement tc
zoning district.
(c) Where there is an5
regulations applicable in
this division and those a~
this chapter, the more
re
(2) That this ordinance
adoption.
And, further, the Board a
AN ORDINANCE TO
OF CHESTERFIELD,
he Upper Swift Cre~
the regulations f
!k watershed shall
or the underlying
conflict between the development
the Upper Swift Cre~k watershed under
,plicable under any pther provision of
~trictive regulations shall apply.
~all become effectiue immediately upon
~opted the following resolution:
.~MEND THE CODE OF THE COUNTY
1978, AS AMENDED, BY AMENDING
]CTION 21.1-229.4 RELATING TO
AND REENACTINGBouNSI,DARY ADJUSTMENTS-/
e Board of SupervisOrs of Chesterfield
BE IT ORDAINED by t~
County:
(1) That Secti
of chesterfield, 1978, as
read as follows'
sec. 21.1-229.4. Boundar'
(a) The delineation of
protection areas or resou~
the director of environmer
Dn 21.1-229.4 of the Code of the County
amended, is amend{ed and reenacted to
adjustments
any of the bound~lries of resource
· ce management areas may be adjusted by
tal engineering where an environmental
delineate such environme
shall be performed consis
most recently approved
Identifying and Delineat
site assessment prepared pya qualified expe~t indicates a need
for such change based upo] the environmental ifeatures listed in
section 21.1-229.1(a) tl~rough (d) or section 21.1-229.2(a)
through (d), respectively,. Any such environmental
site assessment shall be drawn to scale and shall clearly
ntal features. Wetlands delineations
tent with procedures specified in the
~dition(s) of the Federal Manual for
ng Jurisdictional Wetlands.
97-24
1/8/97
(b) Any person aggrieved by a decision of the director of
environmental engineering concerning the boundaries of a
resource protection area or a resource management area may
appeal such decision in accordance with the procedures provided
in section 21.1-275.
(c) The provisions of subsections (a) and (b) of this section
shall not apply to property that is undergoing redevelopment if,
due to previous development of the property, the environmental
features listed in 21.1- 229.1(a) through (d) or 21.1-229.2(a)
through (d) (Chesapeake Bay Preservation Area features) cannot
be determined.
(2) That this ordinance shall become effective immediately upon
adoption.
And, further, the Board adopted the following resolution:
AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE CODE OF THE COUNTY
OF CHESTERFIELD, 1978, AS AMENDED, BY AMENDING
AND REENACTING SECTION 21.1-229.6 RELATING TO
ALLOWABLE POST-DEVELOPMENT PHOSPHOROUS LOADS IN
RESOURCE MANAGEMENT AREAS
BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield
County:
(1) That Section 21.1-229.6 of the Code of the County
of Chesterfield, 1978, as amended, is amended and reenacted to
read as follows:
sec. 21.1-229.6. Resource management area requlations
Any use, development or redevelopment of land shall meet the
following performance criteria:
(a) No more land shall be disturbed than is necessary to
provide for the desired use or development.
(b) Indigenous vegetation shall be preserved to the maximum
extent possible consistent with the use and development allowed.
(c) Land development shall minimize imperious cover consistent
with the use or development allowed.
(d) (1) For any use, development or redevelopment, stormwater
runoff shall be controlled to achieve the following:
a. For any new use or development, the post-development
non-point-source pollution runoff load shall not exceed the
pre-development load, based on the calculated average land cover
condition of the county.
b. For redevelopment sites not currently served by water
quality best management practices, the existing non-point-source
pollution load shall be reduced by at least ten (10) percent
after redevelopment.
c. For redevelopment sites currently served by water quality
best management practices, the post-development non-point-source
pollution runoff load shall not exceed the existing load.
(2) The following stormwater management options shall be
considered to comply with the requirements of subsection (d) (1):
a. Incorporation on the site of best management practices
that achieve the required control.
1/8/97
97-25
b. Compliance with a
management program .incc
pursuant to the authority
15.1-466(j), that results
quality protection.
locally adopted r~gional stormwater
~porating pro rat~ share payments
provided in Code oflVirginia, section
in achievement of! equivalent water
c. Compliance with a s~ate or locally implemented program of
stormwater discharge permits pursuant to sec~ion 402(p) of the
federal Clean Water Act, ~s set forth in 40 CFR parts 122, 123,
124, and 504, dated December 7, 1988.
d. For a redevelopment isite that is comple'zely impervious as
currently developed, restoring a minimum of t~enty (20) percent
of the site to vegetated ~pen space.
(3) Any maintenance, ~lteration, use or limprovement to an
existing structure which does not degrade the iquality of surface
water discharge, as deter~ [ned by the director of environmental
engineering, may be exes)ted from the requirements of this
subsection. Any person ag, rieved by a decision of the director
of environmental engineer.ng under this subsection may appeal
such decision in accordahce with the procedures provided in
section 21.1- 275. !
the
(4) Compliance with ,requirements of suSsection (d) (1) (a)
shall be determined by reference to total p~osphorus loads in
stormwater runoff. The po~t-development total
phosphorus loads in stormwater runoff shal not exceed 0.45
pounds per acre per year.~
(e) Where the best m~nagement practices utilized require
regular or periodic maintenance in order o continue their
functions, such maintenanice shall be ensure~ by a maintenance
agreement, bond or other ~ssurance satisfactory to the director
of
environmental engineering!.
(f) Land upon which! agricultural activities are being
conducted shall have a soill and water quality~onservation plan.
Such plan shall be based ~pon the Field office-- Technical Guide
of the U.S. Department oflAgriculture Soil Conservation Service
and accomplish water quality protection consistent with this
section. Such a plan shal!l be approved by th. James River Soil
and Water Conservation DiStrict by January 1 1995.
(2) That this ordinance shall become effecti~ immediately upon
adoption.
Vote: Unanimous
16.D. TO CONSIDER APPROPRIATION OF 1997 BOND PROCEEDS AND
INTEREST EARNINGS FOR SCHOOL AND COUNTY CAPITAL PRO4ECTS
AND ISSUANCE EXPENSES; ADOPTION OF RESCLUTION AUT~ORIZIN~
ISSUANCE OF GENERkL OBLIGATION BONDS AND ADOPTION OF
RESOLUTION AppRovinG THE PRELIMINARY DFFICIAL STATEMENT
FOR THE BOND ISSUE!
Mr. Stegmaier stated thatlthis date and time ~.as been advertised
for a public hearing to consider appropriation of 1997 bond
proceeds and interest ea
projects and issuance
authorizing issuance of
of resolution approving
the bond issue.
No one came forward to sp
unings for School and county capital
expenses; adoption of resolution
eneral Obligation Bonds; and adoption
he preliminary official statement for
~ak in favor of or against this issue.
97-26
1/8/97
On motion of Mr. Daniel, seconded by Mrs. Humphrey, the Board
appropriated $12.950 million in bond proceeds and interest
earnings for School and County capital projects and issuance
expenses and adopted the following resolution authorizing the
issuance of General Obligation Bonds:
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING AND PROVIDING FOR THE ISSUANCE,
SALE AND DELIVERY OF TWELVE MILLION EIGHT HUNDRED
THOUSAND DOLLARS ($12,800,000) PRINCIPAL AMOUNT OF COUNTY
OF CHESTERFIELD, VIRGINIA, GENERAL OBLIGATION PUBLIC
IMPROVEMENT BONDS, SERIES OF 1997; FIXING THE FORM,
DENOMINATION AND CERTAIN OTHER DETAILS OF SUCH BONDS; AND
PROVIDING FOR THE SALE OF SUCH BONDS AND DELEGATING TO
THE COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR CERTAIN POWERS WITH RESPECT
THERETO
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE
COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD, VIRGINIA:
SECTION 1 (a) Findinqs and Determinations.
(a) Pursuant to Chapter 5.1 of Title 15.1 of the Code of
Virginia, 1950 (the same being the Public Finance Act of 1991),
an election duly called and held under the Public Finance Act of
1991 in the County of Chesterfield, Virginia (the "County"), on
November 5, 1996 and an Order of the Circuit Court of the
County, dated January 6, 1997, the County is authorized to
contract debt and issue its general obligation bonds in the
maximum amount of two hundred twenty-eight million three hundred
seventy-four thousand dollars ($228,374,000) for the purposes
set forth below as follows:
(i) general obligation bonds in the maximum
amount of one hundred seventy-four million seven hundred
ninety-nine thousand dollars ($174,799,000) for capital
school improvements projects in the County;
(ii) general obligation bonds in the maximum
amount of thirty-four million twenty thousand dollars
($34,020,000) for public safety improvement projects in
the County;
(iii) general obligation bonds in the maximum
amount of nine million two hundred fifty-five thousand
dollars ($9,255,000) for park and recreation improvement
projects in the County; and
(iv) general obligation bonds in the maximum
amount of ten million three hundred thousand dollars
($10,300,000) for library improvement projects in the
County.
(b) As of the date hereof, none of such general
obligation bonds authorized by the voters of the County at the
aforementioned election held on November 5, 1996 have been
issued by the County, and the Board of Supervisors deems it
advisable and in the best interests of the County to authorize
and provide at this time for the issuance, sale and delivery of
twelve million eight hundred thousand dollars ($12,800,000)
aggregate principal amount of such general obligation bonds for
the following purposes:
(i) eleven million three hundred thousand
dollars ($11,300,000) for capital school improvement
projects in the County; and
(~i) one million five hundred thousand dollars
($1,500,000) for public safety improvement projects in
the County.
1/8/97
97-27
SECTION 2
of Details of Bonds. (a
costs of the public imp]
described in Section 1 (b
to be issued, sold and d
eight hundred thousand dol
general obligation bonds
known as "County of Chest~
Public Improvement Bonds,
to as the "Bonds").
(b) The B
and will bear interest fr~
Authorization of Issuance and Approval
) For the purpose! of financing the
~ovement projects Qf the county, as
hereof, there areihereby authorized
elivered an issue lof twelve million
lars ($12,800,000) Principal amount of
of the County to be designated and
~rfield, Virginia, General Obligation
Series of 1997" (hereinafter referred
Dnds shall be date~ January 15, 1997
)m their date payable on July 1, 1997
and semiannually on each lanuary 1 and July i thereafter. The
Bonds shall mature and become due and payable on January 1 in
each of the years 1998 to ~017, both inclusive, in the principal
amounts set forth after etch such year belowt
Year of Maturity Year of Matu]ity
(January 1) Principal Amount (January 1 Principal
Amount
1998 $640,C00 2008 $640,000
1999 640,C00 2009 640,000
2000 640,C00 2010 640,000
2001 640,C00 2011 640,000
2002 640,C00 2012 640,000
2003 640,C00 2013 640,000
2004 640,C00 2014 640,000
2005 640,~00 2015 640,000
2006 640,~00 2016 640,000
2007 640,Q00 2017 640,000
(c) (i) The Bonds shall be iss~ed only in fully
registered form. One Bo~d representing eac~ maturity will be
issued to and registered in the name of Cede & Co., as nominee
of The Depository Trust Ccmpany, New York, Ne~ York ("DTC"), as
registered owner of the Bonds and each such Bond shall be
· i s
immobilized in the custod~ of DTC. DTC w~ll~act a securities
depository for the Bonds. Individual purchasDs will be made in
book-entry form only, in he principal amount of $5,000 or any
integral multiple thereof. Purchasers will n~t receive physical
delivery of certificates representing thei~ interest in the
Bonds purchased.
(ii) Principal ~nd interest payment~ on the Bonds will
be made by the County by iwire transfer to D~'C or its nominee,
Cede & Co., as registered bwner of the Bonds, which will in turn
remit such payments to the DTC participant,s for subsequent
disbursal to the beneficial owners of the Bo]ids. Transfers of
principal and interest paYments to DTC participants will be the
responsibility of DTC. Transfers of such payments to beneficial
owners of the Bonds 'Dy DTC participants will be the
responsibility of such participants and othe~ nominees of such
beneficial owners. Transfers of ownership, interests in the
Bonds will be accomplishe~ by book entries made by DTC and, in
turn, by the DTC particip~nts who act on behailf of the indirect
participants of DTC and t~e beneficial owner~ of the Bonds.
(iii) The C~unty will not be responsible or liable
for sending transactio]~ statements or !for maintaining,
supervising or reviewinF records maintained by DTC, its
participants or persons a~ting through such participants or for
transmitting payments t¢, communicating with, notifying or
otherwise dealing with ary beneficial owner of the Bonds. So
long as the Bonds are .n book-en~try only form, the County
Treasurer will serve as Registrar and Paying Agent for the
Bonds. The County reser~ss the riglht to designate a successor
Registrar and Paying Age]~t for the Bonds if the Bonds at any
1/8/97
97-28
time cease to be in book-entry only form.
(d) The Bonds maturing on and before January 1, 2007
shall not be subject to redemption prior to their stated
maturities. The Bonds maturing on and after January 1, 2008 (or
portions thereof in installments of $5,000) shall be subject to
redemption at the option of the County prior to their stated
maturities on or after January 1, 2007 in whole or in part at
any time, in such order as may be determined by the County
(except that if at any time less than all of the Bonds of a
given maturity are called for redemption, the particular Bond or
portions thereof shall be selected by lot), at a redemption
price equal to the principal amount thereof, together with the
interest accrued on the principal amount to be redeemed to the
date fixed for the redemption thereof.
(e) In accordance with the provisions of the Detailed
Notice of Sale of the Bonds authorized hereinafter, bidders may
provide that all the Bonds shall be issued as serial Bonds or
may provide that any two or more consecutive annual principal
amounts shall be combined into one or more term Bonds. If the
successful bidder designates principal amounts to be combined
into one or more term Bonds, each such term Bond shall be
subject to mandatory sinking fund redemption commencing on
January 1 of the first year which has been combined to form such
term Bond and continuing on January 1 in each year thereafter
until the stated maturity date of that term Bond. The amount
redeemed in any year shall be equal to the principal amount of
serial Bonds that would otherwise have matured in such year.
Bonds to be redeemed in any year by mandatory sinking fund
redemption shall be redeemed at par and shall be selected by lot
from among the Bonds then subject to redemption. The County, at
its option, may credit against any mandatory sinking fund
redemption requirement term Bonds of the maturity then subject
to redemption which have been purchased and cancelled by the
County or which have been redeemed and not theretofore applied
as a credit against any mandatory sinking fund redemption
requirement.
(f) If any Bond (or any portion of the principal
amount thereof in installments of $5,000) shall be called for
redemption, notice of the redemption thereof, specifying the
date, number and maturity of such Bond, the date and place or
places fixed for its redemption, and if less than the entire
principal amount of such Bond is to be redeemed, that such Bond
must be surrendered in exchange for the principal amount thereof
to be redeemed and a new Bond or Bonds issued equalling in
principal amount that portion of the principal amount thereof
not to be redeemed, shall be mailed not less than thirty (30)
days prior to the date fixed for redemption by first class mail,
postage prepaid, to the registered owner of such Bond at his
address as it appears on the books of registry kept by the
Registrar for the Bonds. The Registrar shall not be required to
exchange or transfer any Bond later than the close of business
on the forty-fifth (45th) day preceding the date fixed for
redemption of such Bond or any portion thereof. If notice of
the redemption of any Bond shall have been given as aforesaid,
and payment of the principal amount of such Bond (or the portion
of the principal amount thereof to be redeemed) and of the
accrued interest payable upon such redemption shall have been
duly made or provided for, interest on such Bond shall cease to
accrue from and after the date so specified for redemption
thereof. So long as the Bonds are in book-entry only form, any
notice of redemption will be given only to DTC or its nominee.
The County shall not be responsible for providing any beneficial
owner of the Bonds with notice of redemption.
1/8/97
97-29
SECTION 3. ~ppointment of Coqnty Treasurer as
Registrar and Payinq Aqen~i Payment of Bonds;!Bo0ks of Reqistry;
Exchanqes and Transfers oif Bonds.
(a) Appointmen. of Reqistrar. Th~ County Treasurer
is hereby appointed as t~.e Registrar and Paying Agent for the
Bonds (hereinafter referred to as the "Registrar").
(b) Payment of Bonds. (i) At any time during which
the Bonds shall be in full~ registered form, ~he interest on the
Bonds of such series shal~ be payable by che~k or draft mailed
by the Registrar to the r~gistered owners of~ ~he Bonds at their
addresses as the same appear on the books of~egistry as of the
record date for the payment of interest on the Bonds, and the
principal of the Bonds sh~ll be payable at th~ principal office
of the Registrar. i !
(ii) At any timie during which the Bonds shall be in
book-entry form, the principal of and inter,est on the Bonds
shall be payable in accordance with the arra]]gements made with
the depository for the Bonds.
(iii) The p~incipal of and int~rest on the Bonds
shall be payable in such Coin or currency of the United States
of America as at the respective dates of payment is legal tender
for public and private debts. Interest on ~.he Bonds shall be
calculated on the basis o~ a 360-day year co]~sisting of twelve
30-day months.
(c) Books of Registry; Exchanges and Transfers of
Bonds. (i) At all tSmas during whiCh ~ny Bond remains
outstanding and unpaid, the Registrar shall k~ep or cause to be
kept at its principal ~ffice, books of registry for the
registration, exchange 6nd transfer of the Bonds. Upon
presentation at the principal office of the ~egistrar for such
purpose, the Registrar, under such reasonabl~ regulations as it
may prescribe, shall regiSter, exchange, tra]~sfer, or cause to
be registered, exchanged or transferred, on the books of
registry the Bonds as herein set forth.
(ii) Any Bond m~y be exchanged at the principal office
of the Registrar for a l~Ke aggregate principal amount of such
Bonds in other authorized principal amounts of the same interest
rate and maturity.(iii) Any BOnd may, in accordance with its terms,
be transferred upon the bo!oks of registry by ~he person in whose
name it is registered, ~n person or by hi~ duly authorized
agent, upon surrender olf such Bond to the Registrar for
cancellation, accompaniedi by a written inst~'ument of transfer
duly executed by the registered owner in p.
authorized agent, in form~ satisfactory to th~
(iv) Ail transfers or exchanges
Section 3(c) shall be made without expense
owner of such Bonds, except as otherwise he~
except that the Registrair shall require t~
registered owner of thei Bond requesting
exchange of any tax or other governmental cha~
paid with respect to sue
surrendered pursuant to tl
SECTION 4. Ex~
CUSIP Identification Numb
(a) Execution
in the name of the County
of the Chairman and the C
~rson or his duly
Registrar.
~ursuant to this
to the registered
· ein provided, and
~e payment of the
such transfer or
ges required to be
~h transfer or exct~ange. All Bonds
is Section 3(c) shall be cancelled.
cution and Authentication of Bonds;
~rs.
)f Bonds. The Bonds! shall be executed
by the manual or facsimile signatures
erk of the Board of Supervisors, and
97-30
1/8/97
the corporate seal of this Board shall be impressed, or a
facsimile thereof printed, on the Bonds.
(b) Authentication of Bonds. The County
Administrator shall direct the Registrar to authenticate the
Bonds and no Bond shall be valid or obligatory for any purpose
unless and until the certificate of authentication endorsed on
such Bond shall have been manually executed by the Registrar.
Upon the authentication of any Bond the Registrar shall insert
in the certificate of authentication the date as of which such
Bond is authenticated as follows: (i) if the Bond is
authenticated prior to the first interest payment date, the
certificate shall be dated as of the date the Bonds are
delivered to and paid for by the initial purchasers thereof;
(ii) if the Bond is authenticated upon an interest payment date,
the certificate shall be dated as of such interest payment date;
(iii) if the Bond is authenticated on or after the record date
for the payment of interest on the Bonds and prior to such
interest payment date, the certificate shall be dated as of such
interest payment date; and (iv) in all other instances the
certificate shall be dated the date upon which the Bond is
authenticated. The execution and authentication of the Bonds in
the manner above set forth is adopted as a due and sufficient
authentication of the Bonds.
(c) CUSIP Identification Numbers. CUSIP
identification numbers may be printed on the Bonds, but neither
the failure to print any such number on any Bonds, nor any error
or omission with respect thereto, shall constitute cause for
failure or refusal by the successful bidder for the Bonds to
accept delivery of and pay for the Bonds in accordance with the
terms of its proposal to purchase the Bonds. No such number
shall constitute or be deemed to be a party of any Bond or a
part of the contract evidenced thereby and no liability shall
attach to the County or any of its officers or agents because of
or on account of any such number or any use made thereof.
SECTION 5. Tax Covenant. The County covenants and
agrees to comply with the provisions of Sections 103 and 141-150
of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 and the applicable Treasury
Regulations promulgated thereunder throughout the term of the
Bonds.
SECTION 6. Sources of Payment of Bonds. The full
faith and credit of the County are irrevocably pledged to the
punctual payment of the principal of and interest on the Bonds
as the same become due. In each year while the Bonds, or any of
them, are outstanding and unpaid, there shall be assessed,
levied and collected, at the same time and in the same manner as
other taxes in the County are assessed, levied and collected, a
tax upon all taxable property within the County, over and above
all other taxes, authorized or limited by law and without
limitation as to rate or amount, sufficient to pay when due the
principal of and interest on the Bonds to the extent other funds
of the County are not lawfully available and appropriated for
such purpose.
SECTION 7. Form of Bonds. The Bonds shall be in
substantially the form set forth below with such necessary or
appropriate variations, omissions and insertions as are
incidental to their numbers, interest rates and maturities or as
are otherwise permitted or required by law or this resolution:
97-31
1/8/97
UNITED
COMMON
COUNT
GENERAL OBLIGAT
S
REGISTERED
No. R-
MATURITY DATE
JANUARY 1,
REGISTERED OWNER:
PRINCIPAL AMOUNT:
INTEl
CEDE &
STATES OF AMERICA
~EALTH OF VIRGINIA
~ OF CHESTERFIELD
[ON PUBLIC IMPROVEMi
ERIES OF 1997
.EST RATE
~NT BOND
CO.
DATE OF BONDS
The County of Ch
the "County"), a politica
Virginia, for value rec
Registered Owner (named a
Maturity Date (specified
been duly called for pre
redemption price shall ha%
Principal Amount (specifi~
Principal Amount on Jul}
January 1 and July 1 there
interest payment date next
hereof to which interest
of authentication is an
from such interest payme
such date, or unless such
period from the sixteent~
calendar month next prec~
date, in which case from s
has been paid to such date
Amount (each such date is
payment date) at the Intel
by check or draft mailed k
to the Registered Owner in
the books of registry kept
the close of business on
not a business day) of th
interest payment date
Registered Owner as it
Interest on this Bond sha[
day year consisting of tw,
The principal of
payable upon presentation
office of the County Trea
Virginia (the "Registrar"
this Bond are payable in
States of America as at th
REGISTERED
($20,500,000) of like d~
number, denomination, ini
provisions, and is issued
of various public improve
under and pursuant to
Constitution and statute
including Chapter 5.1 of
1950, as amended (the sam
CUSIP NO.
% JANUARY 15, 1997 166393
~sterfield (hereinafter referred to as
1 subdivision of t~ Commonwealth of
eived, hereby promises to pay the
bove), or registered assigns, on the
above), unless this Bond shall have
vious redemption and payment of the
'e been duly made oriprovided for, the
~d above), and to pay interest on such
' 1, 1997 and sem~.annually on each
~fter from the date hereof or from the
preceding the date of authentication
hall have been paidi, unless such date
~nterest payment date, in which case
t date if interest has been paid to
date of authentical~ion is within the
~ (16th) day to th~ last day of the
~ding the following interest payment
uch interest payment date if interest
, until the payment of such Principal
]ereinafter referred to as an interest
est Rate (specified above) per annum,
y the Registrar hereinafter mentioned
whose name this Bond is registered on
and maintained by tlhe Registrar as of
the fifteenth (15t~) day (whether or
e calendar month next preceding each
s payable to thei address of the
~ppears on such books of registry.
1 be calculated on the basis of a 360-
~lve 30-day months, i
and premium, if any, on this Bond are
and surrender hereo~ at the principal
surer of the County in Chesterfield,
The principal of and interest on
such coin or currency of the United
~ respective dates Of payment is legal
;ate debts, i
tender for public and pri~ I
' I
This Bond is on~ of a duly authorized issue of Bonds
(herein referred to as the "Bonds") of the aggregate principal
amount of Twenty Million Five Hundred i Thousand Dollars
~te and tenor herewzth, except for
'.erest rate, maturity and redemption
for the purpose of financing the costs
ment projects of and for the County,
and in full compliance with the
s of the Commonwealth of Virginia,
Title 15.11 of the Code of Virginia,
=_ being the Public Finance Act of
1/8/97
97-32
1991), an election duly held in the County under such Chapter
5.1 on November 5, 1996 and resolutions duly adopted by the
Board of Supervisors of the County under such Chapter 5.1.
The Bonds of the issue of which this Bond is one
maturing on and after January 1, 2008 (or portions thereof in
installments of $5,000) shall be subject to redemption at the
option of the County prior to their stated maturities on or
after January 1, 2007 in whole or in part at any time, in such
order as may be determined by the County (except that if at any
time less than all of the Bonds of a given maturity are called
for redemption, the particular Bond or portions thereof shall be
selected by lot), at a redemption price equal to the principal
amount thereof, together with the interest accrued on the
principal amount to be redeemed to the date fixed for the
redemption thereof.
If this Bond is redeemable and this Bond (or any
portion of the principal amount hereof in installments of
$5,000) shall be called for redemption, notice of the redemption
hereof, specifying the date, number and maturity of this Bond,
the date and place or places fixed for its redemption, and if
less than the entire principal amount of this Bond is to be
redeemed, that this Bond must be surrendered in exchange for the
principal amount hereof to be redeemed and a new Bond or Bonds
issued equalling in principal amount that portion of the
principal amount hereof not to be redeemed, shall be mailed not
less than thirty (30) days prior to the date fixed for
redemption by first class mail, postage prepaid, to the
Registered Owner of this Bond at his address as it appears on
the books of registry kept by the Registrar for the Bonds. The
Registrar shall not be required to exchange or transfer this
Bond later than the close of business on the forty-fifth (45th)
day preceding the date fixed for redemption of this Bond or any
portion hereof. If notice of the redemption of this Bond shall
have been given as aforesaid, and payment of the principal
amount of this Bond (or the portion of the principal amount
hereof to be redeemed) and of the accrued interest payable upon
such redemption shall have been duly made or provided for,
interest hereon shall cease to accrue from and after the date so
specified for redemption hereof.
Subject to the limitations and upon payment of the
charges, if any, provided in the proceedings authorizing the
Bonds of the series of which this Bond is one, this Bond may be
exchanged at the principal office of the Registrar for a like
aggregate principal amount of Bonds of other authorized
principal amounts and of the series of which this Bond is one.
This Bond is transferable by Registered Owner hereof, in person
or by his attorney duly authorized in writing, at the principal
office of the Registrar but only in the manner, subject to the
limitations and upon payment of the charges, if any, provided in
the proceedings authorizing the Bonds of the series of which
this Bond is one, and upon the surrender hereof for
cancellation. Upon such transfer a new Bond or Bonds of
authorized denominations and of the same aggregate principal
amount of the series of which this Bond is one will be issued to
the transferee in exchange herefor.
The full faith and credit of the County are
irrevocably pledged to the punctual payment of the principal of
and interest on this Bond as the same become due. In each year
while this Bond is outstanding and unpaid, there shall be
assessed, levied and collected, at the same time and in the same
manner as other taxes in the County are assessed, levied and
collected, a tax upon all taxable property within the County,
over and above all other taxes, authorized or limited by law and
without limitation as to rate or amount, sufficient to pay when
due the principal of and interest on this Bond to the extent
97-33
1/8/97
other funds of the
appropriated for such pur
This Bond shall
certificate of authentic~
signed by the Registrar.
It is hereby ce]
acts, conditions and thinz
and to have been performe
this Bond and the series
happened and have been pe
and manner as required by
of the series of which
constitutional or statuto
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Co
caused this Bond to be e>
the Chairman of such Board
such Board to be imprint~
signature of the Clerk of
January 15, 1997.
[SEAL]
Attest:
Clerk of the Board of
Supervisors
CERTIFIC~
This Bond is on
the within-mentioned proc~
Registrar
Date of Authentication:
For valued rece
a s s i g n ( s ) a n
(Please print or type na]
code, of Assignee)
PLEASE INS~
OTHER TAX IDENr
the within Bond and all
constituting and app¢
Attorney, to transfer su
registration thereof, witl
]ty are not lawfully available and
Dose.
not be valid or obligatory unless the
tion hereon shall have been manually
~tified, recited and declared that all
~s required to have ihappened, to exist
~ precedent to and in the issuance of
of which it is one, do exist, have
rformed in regular and due time, form
law, and that this Bond and the Bonds
this Bond is one do not exceed any
wy limitation of indebtedness.
unty, by its Board of Supervisors, has
iecuted by the facsimile signature of
; a facsimile of the corporate seal of
~d hereon, attested by the facsimile
such Board.; and this Bond to be dated
Chairman of the Board of
Supervisors
TE OF AUTHENTICATION
e of the Bonds delivered pursuant to
~edings.
County Treasurer, as
By:
ASS IGNMEN~
ived the undersigned hereby sell(s),
transfer(s) unto
premises.
Dated:
]e and address, including postal zip
RT SOCIAL SECURITY !OR
~IFYING NUMBER OF ASSIGNEE
rights hereunder, hereby irrevocably
~inting ,
~h bond on the books kept for the
the full power of substitution in the
1/8/97
97-34
Signature Guaranteed:
NOTICE: Signature(s) must be
guaranteed by a member firm of
The New York Stock Exchange,
Inc. or a commercial bank or
trust company.
(Signature of Registered Owner)
NOTICE: The signature above
must correspond with the name
of the Registered Owner as it
appears on the front of this
Bond in every particular,
without alteration, enlargement
or any change whatsoever.
SECTION 8. Sale of Bonds. (a) There is hereby delegated
to the County Administrator authority to sell the Bonds in
accordance with the provisions hereof at competitive sale at not
less than the principal amount thereof, plus accrued interest
thereon from their date to the date of delivery thereof and
payment therefor, and on such other terms and conditions as
shall be provided in the Notice of Sale thereof. The County
Administrator of the County is hereby authorized to cause to be
published and distributed a Notice of Sale of the Bonds in such
form and containing such terms and conditions as he may deem
advisable, subject to the provisions hereof. In lieu of
publishing the full text of the Notice of Sale in accordance
with the provisions of the immediately preceding sentence, the
County Administrator is hereby authorized cause a Summary Notice
of Sale in such form as the County Administrator shall approve
to be published in The Bond Buyer on a date selected by the
County Administrator and is hereby further authorized to cause
to be prepared and distributed a Preliminary Official Statement
and a final Official Statement, a Detailed Notice of Sale and an
Official Proposal Form relating to the Bonds, such Preliminary
Official Statement, together with the forms of the Detailed
Notice of Sale and Official Proposal Form set forth in Appendix
D thereto, to be in substantially the forms thereof presented to
the meeting at which this resolution is adopted.
(b) The County Administrator of the County is hereby
authorized to receive proposals for the purchase of the Bonds
and to accept the proposal offering to purchase the Bonds at the
lowest true interest cost to the County, computed in accordance
with the provisions of the Detailed Notice of Sale; provided (i)
that such proposal is accompanied by a certified or bank
cashier's check in the amount specified in the Detailed Notice
of Sale payable to the order of the "County of Chesterfield,
Virginia", or in lieu thereof a surety bond meeting the
conditions specified in the Detailed Notice of Sale, and is
otherwise in conformity with the Detailed Notice of Sale; (ii)
that the true interest cost to the County as specified in such
proposal is not in excess of seven and one-half percent (7~%);
and (iii) the redemption premium payable upon the redemption of
the Bonds shall not exceed five percent (5%) of the principal
amount thereof. The County Administrator is hereby further
authorized to determine, or to modify the provisions of this
resolution with respect to, the dated date of the Bonds, the
interest payment dates for the Bonds, the dates on which the
Bonds shall mature, the principal amount of the Bonds maturing
on each such maturity date and the redemption provisions
applicable to the Bonds and to fix the rates of interest to be
borne by the Bonds of each maturity as specified in the proposal
accepted by him in accordance with the immediately preceding
sentence.
(c) The County Administrator is hereby further
authorized to execute and deliver to the purchasers of the Bonds
authorized hereunder a Continuing Disclosure Certificate
evidencing the County's undertaking, to comply with the
continuing disclosure requirements of Paragraph (b) (5) of such
1/8/97
97-35
Rule 15c2-12 to the
Continuing Disclosure Ce]
form set forth in Append
official Statement prese
resolution is adopted, t¢
approved by the County Ad~
(including the County Att
such approval to be concl
such Continuing Discl,
Administrator, the Dire,
Attorney are hereby auth,
purchasers of the Bonds ¢
provided for in the Offic
SECTION 9. Fi
Attorney is hereby autho~
this resolution, certif~
Supervisors to be a tru,
Circuit Court of the Coun
SECTION 10.
Clauses or Provisions.
provision of this rest
unenforceable for any reae
of such section, paragrap~
any of the remaining port
SECTION 11. Hz
the sections of this resol
of reference and shall
interpretation or effect
SECTION 7. ~ ~
take effect upon its adou
And, the
approving the preliminary
further,
~ent applicable toi the Bonds, such
~tificate to be in isubstantially the
ix C to the form Of the Preliminary
nted to the meeting at which this
.gether with such changes as shall be
~inistrator upon the advice of counsel
orney or Bond Counsel to the County),
usively evidenced by his execution of
)sure Certificate.i The County
~tor of Accounting and the County
)rized to execute and deliver to the
~ne or more certificates in the forms
ial Statement relating to the Bonds.
[inq of This Resoldtion. The County
?ized and directed to file a copy of
_ed by the Clerk of the Board of
~ and correct copy hereof, with the
%y of Chesterfield.
ions, Paraqraphs,
· agraph, clause or
held invalid or
Invalidity of Sect
If any section, pa~
~tution shall be
on, the invalidity ~r unenforceability
, clause or provision shall not affect
ions of this resolution.
adinqs of Sections! The headings of
[ution shall be solely for convenience
ot affect the meaning, construction,
,f such sections or Of this resolution.
[fective Date. Thi~
tion.
Board adopted the fol
official statement
THORIZING AND PROVI
N AND DISTRIBUTIO
resolution shall
lowing resolution
[or the bond issue:
DING FOR
N OF A
'FICIAL STATEMENT AND AN
lENT IN CONNECTION 4ITH THE
CE OF AN ISSUE OF COUNTY OF
A RESOLUTION AE
THE PREPARATIC
PRELIMINARY O~
OFFICIAL STATE~
PROPOSED ISSUA~
LIGATION
F 1997
Title 15.1 of the
~lic Finance Act of
the Public Finance
Id, Virginia (the
Election") and an
~d January 6, 1997,
issue its general
CHESTERFIELD, ¥IRGINIA, GENERAL OB
PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT BONDS, SERIES O
WHEREAS, pursualnt to Chapter 5.1 oJ
Code of Virginia, 1950 (the same being the Pul
1991), an election duly c611ed and held under
Act of 1991 in the CoUnty of Chesterfie
"County"), on November 5, 1996 (the "Bond
Order of the Circuit Court of the County, dat~
the County is authorized to contract debt and
obligation bonds in the amount of Two Hu]dred Twenty-Eight
Million Three Hundred Seventy-Four ~housand Dollars
($228,374,000); and ! /
WHEREAS, the Beard of Supervisor~.= pf the County (the
"Board") deems it in the best interest of the county to issue
$12,800,000 principal amDunt of the general obligation bonds
authorized at the Bond El~ction, such bonds to be designated and
known as the "County
Obligation Public Impro~
"Bonds"); and
WHEREAS, the
desirable to authorize
appropriate officials and
of Chesterfield, Virginia, General
;ement Bonds, Series of 1997" (the
oard determines it, is necessary and
the County AdminiStrator and other
employees of the County to prepare and
1/8/97
97-36
distribute, or to cause to be prepared and distributed, to
prospective purchasers of the Bonds a Preliminary Official
Statement of the County relating to the Bonds, and to prepare,
execute and deliver, or cause to be prepared, executed and
delivered, to the representative of the purchasers of the Bonds
a final Official Statement of the County relating to the Bonds;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF
SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD, VIRGINIA:
SECTION 1. Preparation and Distribution of
Preliminary Official Statement and Preparation, Execution and
Delivery of Official Statement. (a) The County Administrator
and other appropriate officials and employees of the County are
hereby authorized and directed to prepare and distribute, or
cause to be prepared and distributed, to prospective purchasers
of the Bonds a Preliminary Official Statement relating to the
Bonds, such Preliminary Official Statement to be in
substantially the form presented to and filed with the minutes
of the meeting at which this resolution is adopted. All actions
taken by the officials, employees, agents and attorneys of the
County with respect to the preparation and distribution of such
Preliminary Official Statement prior to the date hereof are
hereby ratified and confirmed.
(b) The County Administrator and other appropriate
officials and employees of the County are hereby authorized and
directed to prepare, or to cause to be prepared, a final
Official Statement relating to the Bonds, such final Official
Statement to be in substantially the form of the Preliminary
Official Statement with the completion therein of the
information with respect to the interest rates to be borne by
the Bonds as specified by the successful bidder for the Bonds
and other definitive details of the Bonds determined upon the
sale of the Bonds to the successful bidder therefor.
(c) The County Administrator is hereby authorized to
execute and deliver to the representative of the purchasers of
the Bonds the final Official Statement relating to the Bonds in
accordance with the provisions of the Detailed Notice of Sale
relating to the Bonds.
SECTION 2. Preliminary Official Statement "Deemed
Final" for Purposes of Securities and Exchanqe Commission Rule
15c2-12. The Preliminary Official Statement shall be "deemed
final" as of its date for purposes of Rule 15c2-12 promulgated
by the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 ("Rule 15c2-12") except for the
omission of information permitted to be omitted by Rule 15c2-12.
The County Administrator is hereby authorized to execute and
deliver to the representative of the purchasers of the Bonds a
certificate dated the date of the Preliminary Official Statement
stating that the Preliminary Official Statement is deemed final
by the County for purposes of Rule 15c2-12 as of its date.
SECTION 3. Effectiveness of Resolution.
resolution shall take effect upon its adoption.
This
Vote: Unanimous
1/8/97
97-37
16.E. TO CONSIDER THE CZ
PLAN FOR CHESTERFi
Mr. Jacobson stated that
for a public hearing to
further stated that the
suburban area is to pre
stable, healthy suburban
that the community has ro
and western sections ~
recommendations of the col
the neighborhood using a
formation of neighborhoo¢
people who care about
increasing community vi~
markers, events and a var
enhance the image and
community; constructing st
the attractiveness of tl
area; physical improveme
property maintenance imp
recommending an increase
property generally north
Area Land Use Plan by ap
stated that the differs
Commission's recommendat
Planning Commission recom~
Cogbill Road (approximat
density residential rath,
that given the Board of
zoning request last month~
with the Planning Commiss
deleting of the collector
Plan. He then presented
Area Plan showing the are
proposed crosswind runway
outerlimits of approach
voltage lines. When as~
voltage power lines wou]
crosswind runway is built
Mr. Warren stated that a
session of the Board meet
better inform the Board
this evening. He furthe~
been developing over two
Ms. Betty Walker, a resid~
that she is representing
Association who support
single-family rental hous
She further stated that
quality of life is two of
support this program.
Mrs. Humphrey excused hez
NTRAL AREA PLAN, AN AMENDMENT TO THE
ELD AND THE THOROUGHFARE PLAN
his date and time has been advertised
consider the Central Area Plan. He
principal issue for this maturing,
serve and maintain the area as the
~ommunity that it is today. He stated
Dm to grow principally in the southern
~f the Plan. He reviewed major
~munity i~.~-~ative including marketing
variety of techniques; continuing the
organizations to build strength and
their neighborhoods and community;
ibility by promoting use of signs,
iety of other techniques to create and
character of the Meadowbrook area
~reetscape projects to visually enhance
~e Hopkins Road/Meadowdale Boulevard
nts to Meadowbrook High School; and
rovements. He stated that staff is
amount of light industrial uses on
of the Airport on the current Central
proximately 1,100 acres. He further
nce between staff and the Planning
~on regarding the Plan is that the
nends that the area between Belmont and
ely 350 acres) be designated as low
~r than light industrial. He stated
Supervisors decision on the Mulberry
the recomlmendation of staff coincides
[on's recommendation and also includes
from the County's adopted Thoroughfare
an overview of a map of the Central
~ of County Airport operations and the
approach zones to the west and east,
patterns to the Airport, and high
~d, he stated that~ some of the high
.d have to be moved if the proposed
in the future.
work session today at the afternoon
lng regarding the Central Area Plan to
in preparation for the public hearing
~ stated that this is a Plan that has
years.
~nt of Kings Forest Subdivision, stated
~he Kings Forest Neighborhood Watch and
the housing inspection program for
ing program that is part of the Plan.
community safety and maintaining a
their goals and requested the Board to
self from the meeting.
Ms. Nancy Hudson, member (~f the County's Committee on the Future
and President of the Mead.owbrook Area Community Council, stated
that the initial support ~rovided bf· the Plan will help as this
community develops a pla~ for its'own se---~-sufficiency. She
expressed appreciation t9Planning staff for their cooperation
and leadership as the ~ was developed. She requested the
Board to give just consideration to all the issues and adopt the
Plan.
Mrs. Humphrey returned t¢ the meeting.
1/8/97
97-38
Ms. Faris, a resident of Belmont Road, stated that she feels the
Board should further review the Plan and expressed concerns
relative to the negative impact of future Airport noise levels
and lighting to current and future area residents.
Mr. Faris, a resident of Belmont Road, requested the Board to
designate the north side of Belmont Road as residential and not
light industrial and for the Board to further address this issue
before a decision is made. He stated that he feels light
industrial zoning will decrease the property value of area homes
and land. He further stated that he feels a buffer is needed
where light industrial is being recommended.
Ms. Margarette Turner, a resident of Belmont Road, requested the
Board to approve the ninety-five acres along Belmont Road as
residential as opposed to light industrial. She stated that her
mother, who was unable to attend the meeting, also supports
residential zoning for this area.
Mr. Robert Turner expressed appreciation to the Board for their
time and efforts in addressing issues and concerns of the
citizens of Chesterfield County. He stated that he feels the
real objective to this issue is the protection of the County's
present and future investment in the Airport. He further stated
that he feels the proposed rezoning is nothing less than a
devise to ensure that designated land will be available when
as/if needed by the Airport. He referenced Amendment #5 of the
Constitution of the United States and stated that he feels in
order to reserve this property for the future use of the Airport
and related development, he feels the County must invoke some
type of holding action in the zoning process and that in doing
so, he feels there is a destruction of property values and a
deprivation of taking away the control of ownership of property.
He further stated that he feels if the County needs this
property for the Airport, the County should purchase the land
and that since the Airport benefits the entire County, the
entire County should share in the cost of the property. He
stated that he feels the Board should not consider action that
would further the County's objective by financially burdening
unfortunate area landowners.
Ms. Amber Cole, a resident of Newbys Bridge Road, stated that
she feels light industrial zoning along Belmont Road will
negatively impact many area landowners. She requested the Board
to support stopping industrial development at the east side and
north side of Belmont Road.
Ms. Nancy Finch, representing the Citizens of Responsible
Government, stated that they support Planning staff's
recommendation regarding the Plan, specifically, the ratio
regarding large industrial and residential and requested the
Board to support the recommendation of staff.
Mr. Walter Marsh stated that he supports light industrial zoning
on the north side of Belmont/Cogbill Roads. He further stated
that he feels buffers are needed to protect the Airport; that
the County needs less residential housing; that industrial
property is much less noise sensitive; and that expanding the
area of the Plan will have a synergistic affect and will be a
major benefit to the County. He expressed concerns relative to
the Single Family Rental Housing Inspection Program as it
relates to the Plan and referenced the Forth Amendment of the
Constitution of the United States of America.
Mr. Scott McRoberts, representing the Chesterfield Business
Council, stated that they support the Plan as recommended by
staff, however, have not had the opportunity to review the
Single Family Rental Housing Inspection Program. He further
stated that they would like to have the opportunity to review
1/8/97
97-39
and address the Program./ He stated that they are in support of
significant light industrial zoning in the area of the Airport
because they feel light,industrial zoning is the highest and
best use for the area of/the Airport.
Mr. Doug Hackman, owner ¢
stated that he does not
industrial development al
and Belmont Roads. He fu
industrial development ir
Mr. Ed DeGennaro, spoke
Coalition, stated that ti
the Belmont Road area and
f Liberty Farm on Newbys Bridge Road,
support encroachment of any further
ong the corridor between Newbys Bridge
fther stated that he feels the current
the area is adequate.
sperson for the Newbys Bridge Road
hey support residential zoning within
oppose light industrial. He further
stated that they are sqpportive, to a fair degree, of the
Planning Commission's reqommendation regarding eliminating the
light industrial zoning n~rth of Cogbill and Belmont Roads. He
suggested that the BoardI consider 'reducing some of the light
industrial zoning southl of Cogbill Road and that they are
recommending that no light industrial zoning be proposed for the
west side of Cogbill RI)ad. He stated that the Coalition
supports White Pine Ext(
possible and use that are
Moorefield, as opposed t¢
John Cogbill, Esquire,
extension of the area we
extension is suited for
this area be removed fro
stated that he feels the
industrial uses. He sugg
note Plan stating that
appropriate at the north
Centralia Road and Iron 5
Airport height obstructio
He also suggested that ii
the Shoosmith Landfill, t
the Bermuda District ir
addition to the Plan as
owned by the same propel
commended staff for thei~
Mr. Gary Gallager, re
Incorporated, requested
the Plan that would allc
Road and Route 10 propert
Mr. Michael Pace, a re~
understands the desire
expressed concerns relati
so far from the Airport.
property should be zone(
affect of Waterford or Mo(
to review the Plan furth~
There being no one els(
hearing was closed.
Mr. Warren expressed appl
into this issue.
~nded being lowered as far south as
as a project similar to Waterford or
light industrial.
stated that he does not feel the
st along the proposed Whitepine Road
Light industrial zoning and requested
m the Plan for light industrial. He
Belmont Road area is good for light
~sted that the Board consider adding a
neighborhood commercial uses may be
east quadrant of the intersection of
ridge Road and consider incorporating
n limit within the comprehensive plan.
~ order to allow for the expansion of
he Board support including an area of
the southern and western plan in
he feels property near the landfill,
· ty owner, should remain intact. He
efforts in developing the Plan.
presenting Chesterfield Courthouse,
ihe Board to consider an amendment to
w commercial uses at their Centralia
~ident of Burnette Drive, stated he
to protect the Airport, however,
ye to allo%~ing light industrial zoning
He further stated that he feels this
[ at least R-88 or something to the
~refield Park. He encouraged the Board
r before taking action.
to address this issue, the public
· eciation to everyone for their input
97-40
1/8/97
Mr. Daniel stated that it was approximately four years ago when
the call went out to relook at the entire Central Area of the
County. He further stated that at that time, one area of the
District had the opportunity to get a jumpstart on the planning
process. He referenced a past controversial case in which a
developer wanted to place ninety houses on approximately thirty
acres on Newbys Bridge Road and noted many citizens did not
support the request because of the negative impact would have on
the area. He further stated that it was at that time when the
previous Board extended the planning process to include the
Newbys Bridge Road area and other areas of the Central part of
the County. He stated that a land use plan is a guide to
development and is not zoning. He further stated that a land
use plan is not taking or depriving anyone of their land or
constitutional rights. He further stated the a land use plan
can affect, significantly, how landowners think in terms of what
their options for developing their property. He further stated
that a previous Board made a decision that the County needed an
Airport located near the Courthouse and not near industry and
that there would be a small industrial park located around the
Airport. He stated that he agrees that there is no need to rush
to a decision regarding this Plan. He requested staff to
develop some alternative maps with some modifications to compare
to staff's original proposal and the recommendation of the
Planning Commission. He requested that the alternative maps
showing the two owners of the property at Centralia and Route
10; leaving everything to the north side of Cogbill Road and the
vacant property at the Cogbill/Route 10 intersection
residential; taking the direct access off Cogbill Road;
eliminating all light industrial zoning along and north of
Belmont Road; and relocating Whitepine Road (the cut-through
road) further down Newbys Bridge Road. He stated that the Plan
does not preempt any landowner from requesting zoning if they
went through the proper process. He further stated that he has
never seen an economic development ratio between residential and
industry influenced by a land use plan. He stated that the way
to achieve economic health is through direct marketing of the
County and taking all forces that affect economic development
into consideration. He further stated that based on all input
from constituents, area neighborhood associations, the area
Churches, he feels one more alternative map needs to be
developed for Board members showing the requested amendments
before a decision is made on the Plan.
Mrs. Humphrey stated that she is cautious about considering Mr.
Cogbill's amendment to the Plan as constituents in the area of
the Shoosmith property have not had the opportunity to address
this as a community-wide issue. She concurred with Mr. Daniel
that a land use plan is only a plan. She stated she supports a
reevaluation of the Centralia Road/Route 10 corner. She further
stated that the County has entered into a tentative land
agreement with a Fortune 500 commercial company and requested
the Plan be indicative of what Fortune 500 is requesting for
zoning.
Mr. Jacobson stated that staff recommended a less intense use
for the northwest quadrant of the intersection of Centralia Road
and Iron Bridge Road because the property directly backs up to
single-family houses and that in other parts of the County,
where there is the opportunity, staff recommends limiting the
types of uses that can be located directly in homeowners
backyards to office or less intense uses.
Mrs. Humphrey concurred with Mr. Daniel regarding the language
addition to the Plan and expressed concerns relative to more
intense uses in the Route 10 Corridor. She stated that she
feels property at the 288 Interchange should be incorporated
into Plan in the future as this property is critical to the
proper development of the County's government center. She
1/8/97
97-41
further stated that she f~els the County should be conscious of
future plans of Route .0 property owners. She referenced
various road potentials
Ironbridge Road and expr~
uses have been fully
intersection. She stat~
however, feels there is m
the Route 10 area.
Mr. Barber stated that he
and others to discuss th
year, residents were conc~
Newbys Bridge Road. He
put Newbys Bridge Road on
Plan to expedite repairs
to build some roads.
projects comes from comm~
stated that the County
development and that th
residential development k
case similar to the Mulb~
their efforts in this pre
been asked to remain fir
best efforts in planning.
the Planning staffs re
amendments have done to t
that he is unsure whether
reduces the industrial
concerns relative to
residential zoning is ir
feels the County should
County more attractive, ¢
requested staff to provl
impacts of the body of t~
stated he is unsure wheth~
Housing Inspection Progr~
Program. He further stat~
in the area of Kingsland Road and
ssed concerns relative to whether all
identified for the future of this
~d that she feels the Plan is good,
ach potential for more intense uses in
would like to meet with Mr. DeGennarro
e Plan. He further stated that last
~rned about traffic and accidents along
~tated that Mr. Daniel has offered to
the County's Six Year Road Improvement
in that road and the County has offered
He further stated funding for road
rcial and industrial development. He
las become overrun with residential
County cannot continue increasing
ecause the County will be faced with a
~rry request. He commended staff for
cess and stated that staff always has
m in recommending to the Board their
He stated that he would like to see
~ommendation and what the proposed
nat recommendation. He further stated
he can be supportive of something that
portion in the Plan and expressed
increased school overcrowding when
creased. He further stated that he
have products to market to make the
.therwise residents will relocate. He
~de information regarding the fiscal
.e Central Area Plan to the Board. He
~r he supports the Single Family Rental
m and noted the fiscal impact of this
~d that he would like to see any fiscal
impacts of the Plan addressed during the Budget process. He
stated that he concurs that there is no rush in taking action on
this issue this evening./
Mr. McHale commended staf~ and citizens for their involvement in
this process and stated '2hat he feels the Plan is impressive.
He expressed concerns relative to reducing industrial zoning in
the Plan and stated that ~
the ~an will signific~
commercial or industrial
land and will make the
stated that he had very g]
Plan and that he like t¢
action is taken and that
make additions to the Pi~
Mr. Daniel stated that h~
planned, is being removed
the County has not lost o
opportunities in the AJ
industrial zoning. He
vacant land zoned for in¢
.e feels talking industrial property off
~ntly reduce the likelihood that a
developer will be interested in that
~ounty less competitive. He further
· ave concerns about adding areas to the
further address the Plan before any
.e feels it would not be a good idea to
.n at this stage in the process.
does not feel any acreage, as far as
from the Plan. He further stated that
been denied any economic development
.rport area because of the lack of
~tated that the County has a lot of
[ustry.
Mr. Daniel then made a mc
Board to defer consider
amendment to the Plan for
until February 12, 1997 ~or further review.
When asked, Mr. Micas s~ated that if changes
Plan, the Board is not required to extend the
~tion, seconded by Mr. McHale, for the
ation of the Central Area Plan, an
Chesterfield and the Thoroughfare Plan
are made to the
public hearing.
1/8/97
97-42
Mr. Daniel requested that the motion reflect that the deferral
of the Central Area Plan is based on the premises that the
public hearing was closed.
Mr. Warren commended the Board for their time and comments in
debating this issue and stated that these types of debates show
the citizens how important plans are and how important this
Board deliberates on the future of Chesterfield planning.
Mr. Warren then called for the vote on the motion made by Mr.
Daniel, seconded by Mr. McHale, for the Board to defer
consideration of the Central Area Plan, an amendment to the Plan
for Chesterfield and the Thorouqhfare Plan until February 12,
1997, based on the premises that the public hearing regarding
the Plan is closed.
Vote: Unanimous
17. ADJOURNMENT
On motion of Mr. Barber, seconded by Mrs. Humphrey, the Board
adjourned at 9:20 p.m. until January 22, 1997 at 4:00 p.m.
La~h'e/B. Ramse'y ~-~/
county Administrator
Arthur S. Warren
Chairman
97-43
1/8/97