06SN0127
December 15, 2005 epe
February 21,2006 epe
L^:Lpril 18, 2006 CPC
June 20, 2006 epe
Jul)T 18, 2006 CPC
August 23, 2006 BS
STAFF'S
REQUEST ANALYSIS
AND
RECOMMENDA TION
06SN0127
J. Mark Sowers
Clover Hill Magisterial District
Reams Elementary, Providence Middle and Monacan High Schools Attendance Zones
Northern terminus of Vicki lee Road
REQUESTS:
I. Rezoning from Agricultural (A) to Residential (R-12).
II. Waiver to street connectivity requirements.
PROPOSED LAND USE:
A single family residential subdivision is planned with a minimum lot size of
12,000 square feet. A maximum of 3.63 dwelling units per acres is permitted
within a Residential (R-12) District, yielding approximately eighty-two (82)
dwelling units; the theoretical density permitted in a Residential (R-12) District is
3.05 dwelling units, yielding approximately sixty-eight (68) dwelling units; and
the average actual lots recorded in a Residential (R-12) District, utilizing public
water and sewer, between 2002 and 2004 was 1.99 units per acre, yielding
approximately forty-four (44) dwelling units.
PROFFERED CONDITION 2 WAS AMENDED SUBSEQUENT TO ADVERTISEMENT
OF THE CASE. THEREFORE, THE BOARD WOULD NEED TO SUSPEND THE
PROCEDURES TO CONSIDER THIS CHANGE.
PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION
REQUEST I: RECOMMEND APPROVAL AND ACCEPTANCE OF THE PROFFERED
CONDITIONS ON PAGES 2 THROUGH 5.
Providing a FIRST CHOICE community through excellence in public service
REQUEST II: RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF WAIVER TO STREET CONNECTIVITY
REQUIREMENTS.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Request I:
Recommend approval of the rezoning subject to the applicant adequately
addressing the impact of this development on capital facilities as discussed herein.
This recommendation is made for the following reasons:
A. The proposed zoning and land uses conform to the Northern Area Land
Use Plan which slIggests the property is appropriate for medium density
residential use of 1.51 to 4.0 units per acre.
B. The proffered conditions do not adequately address the impacts of this
development on necessary capital facilities, as outlined in the Zoning
Ordinance and Comprehensive Plan. Specifically, the needs for roads,
schools, parks, libraries and fire stations is identified in the Public
Facilities Plan, the Thoroughfare Plan and the Capital Improvement
Program, and the impact of this development is discussed herein. The
proffered conditions do not mitigate the impact on capital facilities,
thereby insuring adequate service levels are maintained and protecting the
health, safety and welfare of County citizens.
Request II:
Recommend denial of the waiver to street connectivity requirement for the
following reason:
The standards by which an exception to street connectivity should be granted have
not been met.
(NOTE: THE ONLY CONDITION THAT MAYBE IMPOSED IS A BUFFER CONDITION.
THE PROPERTY OWNER(S) MAY PROFFER OTHER CONDITIONS. THE CONDITIONS
NOTED WITH "STAFF/CPC" WERE AGREED UPON BY BOTH STAFF AND THE
COMMISSION. CONDITIONS WITH ONLY A "STAFF" ARE RECOMMENDED SOLELY
BY STAFF. CONDITIONS WITH ONLY A "CPC" ARE ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS
RECOMMENDED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION.)
PROFFERED CONDITIONS
Utilities
(STAFF/CPC)
1.
This development shall utilize public water and sewer. (U)
2
06SN0127-AUG23-BOS
(epc)
(STAFF/CPC)
Cash Proffer
2. Applicant, subdivider, or assignee(s) shall pay the following to the
County of Chesterfield, prior to the issuance of a building permit,
for infrastructure improvements within the service district for the
property:
a.
1. If drainage proffer 9a is to be used, $11,225.00 per
dwelling unit; or the amount approved by the Board
of Supervisors not to exceed $11,225.00 per
dwelling unit adjusted upward times any increase in
the Marshall and Swift Building Cost Index
between July 1, 2005 and July 1 of the fiscal year in
which the payment is made if paid after June 30,
2006. At the time of payment, the $11,225.00 will
be allocated pro-rata among the facility costs as
follows: $3836.00 for schools, $433.00 for parks
and recreation, $6415.00 for roads, $250.00 for
libraries, and $291.00 for fire stations. Payments in
excess of $11,225.00 shall be prorated as set forth
above.
11. If drainage proffer 9b is to be used, $15,600.00 per
dwelling unit; or the amount approved by the Board
of Supervisors not to exceed $15,600.00 per
dwelling unit adjusted upward times any increase in
the Marshall and Swift Building Cost Index
between July 1, 2005 and July 1 of the fiscal year in
which the payment is made if paid after June 30,
2006. At the time of payment, the $15,600.00 will
be allocated pro-rata among the facility costs as
follows: $5331.00 for schools, $602.00 for parks
and recreation, $8915.00 for roads, $348.00 for
libraries, and $404.00 for fire stations.
b. Cash proffer payments shall be spent for the purposes
proffered or as otherwise permitted by law. (B&M)
Timbering
3. Timber management (thinning, etc.) will only be allowed upon
submission and approval of the appropriate management plan to
include erosion control and the issuance of a land disturbance
permit by the Environmental Engineering Department. Any other
timbering shall be incorporated into the construction project
3
06SN0127 -AUG23-BOS
(ST AFF /CPC)
(STAFF/CPC)
erosion and sediment control plan/narrative and will not commence
until the issuance of a land disturbance permit by the
Environmental Engineering Department for subdivision
construction and proper installation of erosion control measures.
(EE)
Architectural Restrictions & Density
4. One story dwellings shall have a minimum gross floor area of 1500
square feet. Dwellings above one story shall have a minimum
gross floor area of 1800 square feet. (P)
5. All exposed portions of the foundations of each dwelling unit shall
be faced with brick veneer. Exposed piers supporting front
porches shall be faced with brick veneer. (P)
6. Any residential lots having sole access through Briarcliff
Subdivision shall have an average lot area of not less than 12,600
square feet. Such lots shall not exceed a density of 2.9 dwelling
units per acre. (P)
7. Any residential lots having sole access through Heatheridge
Subdivision shall have an average lot size of 13,500 square feet.
Such lots shall not exceed a density of 2.7 dwelling units per acre.
(P)
8. Any residential lots having sole access through Forest Acres
Subdivision shall have an average lot size of 17,400 square feet.
Such lots shall not exceed a density of 2.1 dwelling units per acre.
(P)
Drainage
9.
A post development drainage study shall be performed by
the developer from the southern property line of the project
through the existing downstream neighborhoods to the
culvert under Cherylann Road.
a.
The study shall determine the deficiencies in required
capacity, the areas of storm-water inundations and the
hydraulic interrelationships between the existing
storm water conveyance systems.
The study shall propose those onsite and offsite manmade
improvements which will cause the study area to possess
storm drainage capacity that meets, to the maximum extent
4
06SN0127-AUG23-BOS
physically practicable, minimum standards with respect to
required manmade drainage improvements and flood plain
management.
Upon approval by the Environmental Engineering
Department of the drainage improvements called for in the
study, the improvements shall be incorporated into the
construction plans for the project and shall be implemented
as the first phase of development.
The achievement of the storm drainage goals as presented
in herein shall be to the maximum extent practicable as
enabled by the successful level of acquisition of easements
and the issuance of Corps of Engineers and Department of
Environmental Quality permits.
b. In the event that the developer, despite his good faith and
due diligent efforts, is unable to obtain the easements
required for the construction and maintenance of the above
listed improvements, the developer shall request, in writing,
that Chesterfield County acquire such easements. All costs
associated with the acquisition of the easements shall be
borne by the developer. In the event that Chesterfield
County chooses not to assist the developer in acquisition of
the easements, or if the developer, despite his good faith
and due diligent efforts, is unable to obtain the wetlands
permits required to construct the improvements, the
developer shall be relieved of the obligations to make the
drainage improvements listed above and shall instead shall
retain storm-water ansite to meet predevelopment flows.
(EE)
GENERAL INFORMATION
Location:
Eastern terminus of North Vickilee Road and Vickilee Court, northern terminus of
Vickilee Road and western terminus of Marblethorpe Road. Tax IDs 746-699-8830: and
747-699-0340, 0744, 1248, 1750, 2453 and 4454 (Sheet 6).
Existing Zoning:
A
5
06SN0127-AUG23-BOS
Size:
22.6 acres
Existing Land Use:
Vacant
Adiacent Zoning and Land Use:
North - R-15; Single family residential
South - R-7; Single family residential
East - R-9 and A; Single family residential
West - R-9; Single family residential
UTILITIES
Public Water System:
The public water system is available. There is an eXisting eight (8) inch water line
extending along Marblethorpe Road that terminates adjacent to the eastern boundary of the
request site. In addition, there is an existing six (6) inch water line extending along Vickilee
Road that terminates adjacent to the western boundary of this site. Use of the public water
system is intended. (Proffered Condition 1)
Per Utilities Department Design Specifications (DS-21), wherever possible, two (2) supply
points must be provided for subdivisions containing more than twenty-five (25) lots.
Public Wastewater System:
This site is within the Falling Creek Drainage Basin. There is an existing eight (8) inch
wastewater collector line extending along a portion of the southern boundary of this site.
Wastewater service to the majority of the request site will require an extension from this
line. Use of the public wastewater system is intended. (Proffered Condition 1)
ENVIRONMENTAL
Drainage and Erosion:
The subject property drains in three (3) directions. A small portion of the property drains
to the southwest to Heathridge, Section 4. There are currently easements available that
could be utilized for improvements if necessary. Possibly twenty-five (25) percent of the
property drains in this direction. The remaining property drains to the south in two (2)
locations into Forest Acres, Section 2.
6
06SN0127-AUG23-BOS
Recently, the Environmental Engineering Department has been made aware of off-site
drainage problems to the south of the property. Specifically, the Forest Acres
Subdivision, recorded in 1959, was developed prior to the County's enforcement of storm
water regulations. Improvements would be necessary as the existing storm water
conveyance systems are not adequate. As a result, the Environmental Engineering
Department recommends that a post development drainage study be performed from the
southern property line of the project through the existing downstream neighborhoods
through the culvert under Cherylann Road to determine drainage deficiencies. From this
study, the applicant should commit to performing both on- and off-site drainage
improvements that would provide the study area with a storm drainage capacity that
meets, to the maximum extent practicable, minimum standards required for manmade
drainage improvements and flood plain management. Proffered Condition 9 commits to
this study and to the drainage improvements suggested by this study to the maximum
extent practicable. Otherwise, stormwater shall be retained onsite to meet
predevelopment flows.
The property is wooded and, as such, should not be timbered without obtaining a land
disturbance permit from the Department of Environmental Engineering. This will ensure
that adequate erosion control measures are in place prior to any land disturbance.
(Proffered Condition 3)
PUBLIC FACILITIES
The need for fire, school, library, park and transportation facilities is identified in the Public
Facilities Plan, the Thoroughfare Plan and the Capital Improvement Program and further detailed
by specific department, herein. This development will have an impact on these facilities.
Fire Service:
The Public Facilities Plan indicates that fire and emergency medical service (EMS) calls
are expected to increase forty-four (44) to seventy-eight (78) percent by 2022. Six (6)
new fire/rescue stations are recommended for construction by 2022 in the Plan. In
addition to the six (6) new stations, the Plan also recommends the expansion of five (5)
existing stations. Based on forty-four (44) dwelling units, this request will generate
approximately nine (9) calls for fire and emergency medical service each year. The
applicant has not adequately addressed the impact of this development on fire and EMS
facilities. (Proffered Condition 2)
The Co.urthouse Road Fire Station, Company Number 20 provides fire protection and
emergency medical service. When the property is developed, the number of hydrants,
quantity of water needed for fire protection, and access requirements will be evaluated
during the plans review process.
The applicant has requested not to make a street connection to each of the four (4)
existing stub roads. In addition to these connections possibly being required to satisfy
ordinance requirements for the number of access points into this proposed development,
7
06SN0127-AUG23-BOS
in an emergency situation, these connections would benefit both the applicant's project
and the surrounding developments. The Fire Department continues to support
connectivity between subdivisions so that multiple access points are available to assist in
an emergency response.
Schools:
Approximately twenty-four (24) students will be generated by this development.
Currently this site lies in the Reams Elementary School attendance zone: capacity - 661,
enrollment - 560~ Providence Middle School zone: capacity - 1,089, enrollment - 993;
and Monacan High School zone: capacity - 1,692, enrollment - 1,642. The enrollment is
based on September 30, 2005 and the capacity is as of 2005-2006. This request will have
an impact on all schools. There are currently eight (8) trailers at Providence Middle that
are used for various programs.
This case, combined with other tentative residential developments and zoning cases in the
area, would continue to push these schools to capacity, especially at the secondary level.
This case could necessitate some form of relief in the future. The applicant has not
adequately addressed the impact of this development on school facilities. (Proffered
Condition 2)
Libraries:
Consistent with the Board of Supervisors' policy, the impact of development on library
services is assessed County-wide. Based on projected population growth, the Public
Facilities Plan identifies a need for additional library space throughout the County.
Development of the property noted in this case would most likely impact the existing La
Prade Library, the existing Clover Hill Library or a proposed new branch in the Reams-
Gordon. area. A need for additional library space in this area of the County is identified
in the Plan. The applicant has not adequately addressed the impact of this development
on library facilities. (Proffered Condition 2)
Parks and Recreation:
The Public Facilities Plan identifies the need for three (3) new regional parks, seven (7)
community parks, twenty-nine (29) neighborhood parks and five (5) community centers
by 2020. In addition, the Plan identifies the need for ten (10) new or expanded special
purpose parks to provide water access or preserve and interpret unique recreational,
cultural or environmental resources. The Plan identifies shortfalls in trails and
recreational historic sites.
The applicant has not adequately addressed the impact of this development on park
facilities. (Proffered Condition 2)
8
06SN0127-AUG23-BOS
Transportation:
The property (22.6 acres) is currently zoned Agricultural (A), and the applicant is
requesting rezoning to Residential (R-12). Based on single-family trip rates, development
could generate approximately 470 average daily trips. These vehicles could be distributed
through streets in Briarcliff, Heatheridge, Lake Crystal Farms and Forest Acres
Subdivisions to Courthouse Road and Adkins Road which had 2004 traffic counts of
45,119 and 2,789 vehicles per day (VPD), respectively, and to Reams Road which had a
2005 traffic count of 12,555 vehicles per day.
The property has potential access through four (4) stub road rights of way: Marblethorpe
Road at two (2) locations, North Vickilee Road and Vickilee Road. Included in the
Subdivision Ordinance is the Planning Commission's Stub Road Policy. The Policy
suggests that subdivision streets anticipated to carry 1 ,500 VPD or more should be
designed as "no-lot frontage" collector roads. Traffic generated by this development
could travel along streets in Briarcliff, Heatheridge, Lake Crystal Farms and Forest Acres
Subdivisions. Those streets were developed prior to the adoption of the Stub Road Policy.
Marbleridge Road (2004 traffic count of 1,705 VPD), Cherylann Road (2005 traffic count
of 2,474 VPD) and Ronaldton Road (2005 traffic count of 1,358 VPD) are some of the
subdivision streets that are anticipated to be used in traveling to and from this proposed
developmenta Traffic volumes on Marbleridge Road and Cherylann Road currently
exceed the acceptable subdivision street volume as defined by the Stub Road Policy.
However, there is no means of accessing this proposed development that would eliminate
accessibility to those streets.
Area roads need to be improved to address safety and accommodate the increase in traffic
generated by this development. Courthouse Road, Reams Road and Adkins Road will be
directly impacted. Courthouse Road is a six-lane divided facility, and its capacity is
acceptable (Level of Service C) for the volume (45,119 VPD) of traffic it currently
carries. Sections of Reams Road have twenty (20) to twenty-two (22) foot wide
pavement with one (1) foot wide shoulders and substandard vertical and horizontal
aligrunents. Based on the volume of traffic it currently carries (12,555 VPD), this road
operates at capacity (Level of Service E). No road improvement projects in this part of
the county are included in the Six - Year Improvement Plan"! except for safety
improvement projects to construct turn lanes at various intersections along Reams Road
between Adkins Road and Wadsworth Drive. The applicant has proffered to contribute
some money towards mitigating the traffic impacts of the proposed residential
development (Proffered Condition 2). The proffered amount is not consistent with the
Board of Supervisors' Policy. Therefore, the Transportation Department cannot support
this request.
9
06SN0127-AUG23-BOS
Financial Impact on Capital Facilities:
PER UNIT
Potential Number of New Dwelling Units 44* 1.00
Population Increase 119.68 2.72
Number of New Students
Elementary 10.25 0.23
Middle 5.72 0.13 I
High 7.44 0.17
TOTAL 23.41 0.53
Net Cost for Schools 235,312 5,348
Net Cost for Parks 26,576 604
Net Cost for Libraries 15,356 349
Net Cost for Fire Stations 17,820 405
A verage Net Cost for Roads 393,448 8,942
TOT AL NET COST 688,512 15,648
*Based on an average actual density of 1.99 dwelling units per acre. Actual number of lots and
corresponding impact may vary.
As noted, this proposed development will have an impact on capital facilities. Staff has
calculated the fiscal impact of every new dwelling unit on schools, roads, parks, libraries and fire
stations at $15,648 per unit. The applicant has been advised that a maximum proffer of $15,600
per unit would defray the cost of the capital facilities necessitated by this proposed development.
Proffered Condition 2 offers two (2) options for defraying the cost of capital facilities
necessitated by this proposed development. The first offers $11,225 per dwelling unit and
improvements to the drainage system, including off-site work, as identified in Proffered
Condition 9.a. The second provides $15,600 per dwelling unit if the applicant is unable to
construct the drainage option inclusive of off-site improvements but instead retains stormwater
on-site as described in Proffered Condition 9.b. The reduced cash proffer does not mitigate the
impact of the proposed development on the categories of capital facilities noted in the plans
identified above. Consequently, the County's ability to provide adequate facilities will be
adversely affected.
Note that circumstances relevant to this case, as presented by the applicant, have been reviewed
and it has been determined that it is appropriate to accept the maximum cash proffer in this case.
Staff recommends the applicant fully address their impact on all categories of capital facilities.
10
06SN0127-AUG23-BOS
The Planning Commission and the Board of Supervisors, through their consideration of this
request, may determine that there are unique circumstances relative to this request that may
justify acceptance of proffers as offered for this case.
LAND USE
Comprehensive Plan:
Lies within the boundaries of the Northern Area Land Use Plan which suggests the
property is appropriate for medium density residential use of 1.51 to 4.0 units per acre.
The property lies within the boundaries of the draft Northern Courthouse Road Plan
Amendment.
Area Development Trends:
Surrounding properties are zoned Residential (R-15, R-9 and R-7) and are developed as
part of the Briarcliff, Heatheridge and Forest Acre Subdivision developments or are
zoned Agricultural (A) and occupied by single family dwellings on acreage parcels. It is
anticipated that any residential redevelopment of acreage properties in this general area
will be consistent with the recommended densities of the Plan.
Comparison of Lot Sizes and Density:
Currently, the Ordinance requires a mInImum lot size of 12,000 square feet in a
Residential (R-12) District. Access to the subject property may be provided through
Briarcliff, Heatheridge or Forest Acres Subdivisions. Briarcliff Subdivision, Section 4,
contains an average lot size of 12,600 square feet and density of 2.9 dwelling units per
acre; Heatheridge Subdivision, Section 2, contains an average lot size of 13,500 square
feet and a density of 2.7 dwelling units per acre; and Forest Acres Subdivision, Sections
C and D together contain an average lot size of 17,400 square feet and a density of 2.1
dwelling units per acre. In an effort to address compatibility with adjacent developments
through which this property may have sole access, the applicant has addressed average lot
sizes and densities consistent with those of the aforementioned adjacent subdivisions.
(Proffered Conditions 6, 7 and 8)
Dwelling Size and Foundation Treatment:
Proffered Conditions 4 and 5 address mInImum square footages for dwellings and
foundation treatment.
Street Connectivity:
The property has potential access through four (4) stub road rights of way. The applicant
has requested a waiver to the "Residential Subdivision Connectivity Policy" to permit
connection to only one or more of these stub roads. In addition to promoting fire and
11
06SNOI27-AUG23-BOS
emergency services safety, subdivision road connections provide interconnectivity
between residential developments, thereby reducing congestions along collector and
arterial roads and providing a convenient and safe access to neighboring properties.
The "Policy" allows the Board, through the Commission's recommendation, to waive the
requirement for streets in new subdivisions to connect to adjacent public streets that are
designed as local streets, residential collectors and thoroughfare streets. Staff must
evaluate this waiver based upon three (3) criteria: (1) there must be a sufficient number
of other stub streets to adequately disperse traffic and not cause a concentrated use of any
one (1) stub street; or (2) the connection to a particular stub will cause concentrated
traffic at that location; (3) the projected traffic volume on anyone (1) local street within
an existing subdivision exceeds 1,500 vehicle trips per day. As previously noted, streets
within .the adjacent Briarcliff, Heatheridge, Lake Crystal Farms and Forest Acres
Subdivisions were developed prior to the adoption of the 1,500 vehicles per day (VPD)
limitation and, as such, several currently exceed this limitation. However, maintaining all
available stub road connections should disperse the traffic generated by this proposed
development. Limiting stub road connections would put the traffic burden on particular
stub road(s) in violation of the "Policy" standards. As such, staff does not support the
exception to connectivity.
CONCLUSIONS
The proposed zoning and land uses conform to the Northern Area Land Use Plan which suggests
the property is appropriate for medium density residential use of 1.51 to 4.0 units per acre. The
proffered conditions do not adequately address the impacts of this development on necessary
capital facilities, as outlined in the Zoning Ordinance and Comprehensive Plan. Specifically, the
needs for roads, schools, parks, libraries and fire stations is identified in the Public Facilities
Plan, the Thoroughfare Plan and the Capital Improvement Program, and the impact of this
development is discussed herein. The proffered conditions do not adequately mitigate the impact
on capital facilities, thereby insuring adequate service levels are maintained and protecting the
health, safety and welfare of County citizens. In addition, the application fails to address
potential erosion c~ncems.
Further, the application fails to address the standards by which an exception to street
connectivity should be granted per the Board's adopted "Residential Subdivision Connectivity
Policy". Specifically, limiting stub road connections would cause a concentrated use of
particular stub roads and would not adequately disperse the traffic from this proposed
development.
Given these considerations, staff recommends approval of the rezoning (Request I) subject to the
applicant adequately addressing impacts on capital facilities and erosion, as discussed herein.
Further, staff recommends denial of the waiver to street connectivity requirements (Request II).
12
06SN0127-AUG23-BOS
CASE HISTORY
Planning Commission Meeting (12/15/05):
At the request of the applicant, the Commission deferred this case to February 21,2006.
Staff (12/16/05):
The applicant was advised in writing that any significant, new or revised information
should be submitted no later than December 20, 2005, for consideration at the
Commission's February 21,2006, public hearing.
Also, the applicant was advised that a $250.00 deferral fee must be paid prior to the
Commission's public hearing.
Applicant (12/21/05):
The deferral fee was paid.
Applicant (1/6/06):
Revised proffered conditions were submitted.
Area Property Owners, Applicant and Staff (1/19/06):
A meeting was held to discuss this request. Concerns included connectivity to area roads
and the potential transportation impacts; and drainage impacts on Forest Acres
Subdivision.
Applicant (1/26/06,2/8/06 and 2/21/06):
Revised proffered conditions were submitted.
Planning Commission Meeting (2/21/06):
The Commission deferred this request to April 18, 2006, thirty (30) days on their own
motion and thirty (30) days at the applicant's request.
13
06SN0127-AUG23-BOS
Staff (2/22/06):
The applicant was advised in writing that any significant, new or revised information
should be submitted no later than March 27, 2006, for consideration at the Commission's
April 18, 2006, public hearing.
Also, the applicant was advised that a $500.00 deferral fee must be paid prior to the
Commission's public hearing.
Applicant (3/3/06):
The deferral fee was paid.
Applicant (3/27/06):
Revised proffered conditions were submitted.
Planning Commission Meeting (4/18/06):
On their own motion, the Commission deferred this case to June 20, 2006.
Staff (4/19/06):
The applicant was advised in writing that any significant, new or revised information
should be submitted no later than April 24, 2006, for consideration at the Commission's
June 20, 2006, public hearing.
Staff (5/19/06)~
To date, no new information has been submitted.
Planning Commission Meeting (6/20/06):
At the request of the applicant, the Commission deferred this case to July 18, 2006.
14
06SN0127-AUG23-BOS
Staff (6/21/06):
The applicant was advised in writing that any significant, new or revised information
should be submitted no later than June 26, 2006, for consideration at the Commission's
July 18, 2006, public hearing.
Also, the applicant was advised that a $500.00 deferral fee must be paid prior to the
Commission's public hearing.
Applicant (6/27/06):
The deferral fee was paid.
Staff (6/28/06):
To date, no new information has been submitted.
Applicant (7/17/06):
Revised proffered conditions were submitted.
Planning Commission Meeting (7/18/06):
The applicant accepted the Commission's recommendation. There was no opposition
present~
Messrs. Wilson, Litton and Gulley expressed concern relative to Proffered Condition 2
("Cash Proffer") not allowing for escalation of payment. The applicant agreed to modify
the proffer to include the Marshall and Swift Building Cost Index prior to the Board's
consideration of this request.
Mr. Gulley noted that drainage had been a serious issue in this area; that efforts to correct
this existing problem merited special consideration; and that the waiver to connectivity
would result in less disturbance of wetlands and preserve more open space.
On motion of Mr. Gulley, seconded by Mr. Litton, the Commission recommended
approval and acceptance of the proffered conditions on pages 2 through 5.
AYES: Unanimous.
15
06SN0127-AUG23-BOS
On motion of Mr. Gulley, seconded by Mr. Litton, the Commission recommended
approval of waiver to street connectivity requirements as they pertained to N. Vickilee
Road and N. Marlbethorpe Road.
AYES: Unanimous.
Applicant (8/14/06):
Proffered Condition 2 was amended to include the Marshall and Swift Building Cost
Index.
The Board of Supervisors, on Wednesday, August 23,2006, beginning at 7:00 p.m., will take
under consideration this request.
16
06SN0127 -AUG23-BOS
If
>
~
~
....,
CD
CD
LL
o
o
CO
U'J
N
~
.
~
o
I-
I::i<e
~ ..
ON
z&
~~
O~
o
o
CD
o
<(