02-26-1997 MinutesBOARD OF SUPERVISORS
MINUTES
February 26, 1997
Supervisors in Attendance=
Mr. Arthur S. Warren, Chairman
Mrs. Renny B. Humphrey, Vice Chrm.
Mr. Edward B. Barber
Mr. Harry G. Daniel
Mr. J. L. McHale, III
Mr. Lane B. Ramsey
County Administrator
Staff in Attendance:
Colonel Carl R. Baker,
Police Department
Mr. Craig Bryant, Diro,
Utilities
Ms. Marilyn Cole, Asst.
County Administrator
Ms. Faith L. Davis,
Mrs. Doris R. DeHart,
Asst. Co. Admin.,
Legis. Svcs. and
Intergovern. Affairs
Chief F. W. Dolezal,
Fire Department
Mr. William D. Dupler,
Building Official
Mr. Michael Golden, Dir.,
Parks and Recreation
Mr. Bradford S. Hammer,
Deputy Co. Admin.,
Management Services
Mr. Russell Harris,
County Ombudsman
Mr. Thomas E. Jacobson,
Dir., Planning
Mr. Donald Kappel, Dir.,
Public Affairs
Mr. Robert L. Masden,
Deputy Co. Admin.,
Human Services
Mr. R. John McCracken,
Dir., Transportation
Mr. Richard M. McElfish,
Dir., Env. Engineering
Mr. Steven L. Micas,
County Attorney
Mr. Francis M. Pitaro, Dir.,
General Services
Mr. James J. L. Stegmaier,
Dir., Budget & Management
Mr. M. D. Stith, Jr.,
Deputy Co. Admin.,
Community Development
Mr. Frederick Willis, Jr.,
Dir., Human Resource Mgt.
Mr. Warren called the regularly scheduled meeting to order at
4:00 p.m.
1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
On motion of Mr. McHale, seconded by Mr. Daniel, the Board
approved the minutes of February 12, 1997, as submitted6
Vote: Unanimous
,2/26/97
97-111
2. COUNTY ADMINISTRATORtS COMMENTS
Mr. Ramsey introduced Ms. Nell Pace and Mr. R
of the Domestic Violence Intervention Projec
to recognize the Board of Supervisors for th,
program.
Ms. Nell Pace expressed appreciation to tl
support and concern of the Intervention Pr
since inception of the program in May 1996
have been assisted and that the program
percent rate of success. She expressed ap
Humphrey and Mr. Daniel for being at the f¢
program began. She stated that this proje
putting families together and that ChesterfiE
the first in the nation to begin such a prc
stated Mr. Christopher Dardon, a national sp~
in Chesterfield in May, 1997 to speak abou
invited each of the Board members to attend
Mr. Roger Hinde stated that this progra
expressed appreciation to the Board for the
the opportunity to keep this program functi¢
Dger Hinde, members
who were present
~ir support of this
le Board for their
~ject. She stated
, over 150 clients
has a seventy-two
preciation to Mrs.
undation when this
~t has assisted in
~ld County is one of
gram. She further
)kesperson, will be
~ this program and
the meeting.
m is growing and
ir support and for
~ning.
Mr. Ramsey stated that the County is very
very good working relationship with the Vir¢
Transportation (VDOT), particularly in
Safety services. He then introduced Ms. LyI
Ms. Furr introduced Mr. Lynn D. Wagner,
Engineer for the Virginia Department of Tr~
and volunteer County Special Police Officer
Resident Engineer for VDOT. She expressed
Wagner for his assistance and cooperation to
fortunate to have a
nia Department of
_ Fire and Public
ida Furr.
Assistant Resident
.nsportation (VDOT)
and Mr. Jim Smith,
Lppreciation to Mr.
the County over the
years and briefly described many events and
the County. She presented him with a Support
of the Fire Department, for services he has
years.
Mr. Warren expressed appreciation to Mr
assistance, both as a citizen and employe
Department of Transportation.
Mr. Wagner expressed appreciation for the r~
3. BOARD COMMITTEE REPORTS
Mr. Barber stated that his First Monday me
March 3, 1997 with the topic of discussion
Road Widening Project and noted that Mr. Wa
will be the guest speakers. He stated that
with the Commission of the Future of
(Commission under the leadership of Delegat~
noted that some findings will be brought forw
of the summer and noted there are a lot ol
General Assembly has commissioned.
in which he assisted
er Badge, on behalf
provided over the
· Wagner for his
e of the Virginia
~cognition.
~ting will be held
being the Robious
gner and Mr. Smith
le has been working
Public Education
Ted Bennett), and
ard towards the end
studies that the
Mrs. Humphrey stated the Matoaca District Cz ~stituents meeting
will be held March 3, 1997 with the topic ¢.f discussion being
teenage substance abuse throughout the
several teenagers and groups, that have bee!
school youths regarding substance, will be
She further stated that a joint Matoaca and C
Constituents meeting will be held February
Bosher being the guest speaker.
Mr. McHale stated that the Bermuda District C.
will be held February 27, 1997 with the t
being the impact of Welfare Reform on Chest
noted that Ms. Sara Snead, Director of socia
present at the meeting to conduct a prese
Reform.
97-112
~ty and noted that
~ working with high
~he guest speakers.
lover Hill District
18, 1997 with Dr.
)nstituents meeting
Dpic of discussion
.erfield County and
Services, will be
~tation on Welfare
2/26/97
Mr. Warren stated that he attended the Meadowbrook High School
English Class/Debate Team and answered questions from the class.
He stated that he assisted in cutting the ribbon for the Mega
office Furniture Park; that he attended the Bexley Annual
meeting on February 21, 1997 in which Dr. Bosher and Lieutenant
Colonel Dennis McDonald were guest speakers on the topic of
school and public safety issues; that he attended the Manchester
Rescue Squad Annual meeting; that he attended the Gateway
Association meeting with the topic of discussion being the
Eastern Midlothian Corridor Plan; and that he attended a School
Board Network meeting.
Mrs. Humphrey noted that Mr. Patrick Liu, a student in which the
Board recently presented a resolution to for his scholastic
achievements, was recently notified by the National Scholastic
Achievement Organization for receiving a perfect score on his
SAT.
REQUESTS TO POSTPONE ACTION, ADDITIONS, OR CHANGES IN THE
ORDER OF PRESENTATION
On motion of Mr. McHale, seconded by Mr. Barber, the Board moved
Item 5.C., Adoption of Resolution Recognizing Ms. Becky Do York
Upon Her Retirement, to follow Item 8.D.l.b., Adoption of
Resolution Requesting Licensure of Two Additional Beds at the
Group Home and Reimbursement for Construction Costs and added
Item 8.D.15., Allocation of Funds for Construction of new
Lighting Systems at Rockwood Park and Midlothian Middle School
to follow Item 8.D.14., Set Date for Public Hearing to Consider
Changing the Effective Date of the Increase in the E-911 Tax,
and, adopted the agenda, as amended.
Vote: Unanimous
5. RESOLUTIONS AND SPECIAL RECOGNITIONS
5.A. RECOGNIZING DEPUTY RUDOLPH J. JARRELL UPON HISRETIREMENT
Mr. Hammer introduced Deputy Rudolph J. Jarrell who was present
to accept the resolution.
On motion of the Board, the following resolution was adopted:
WHEREAS, Mr. Rudolph J. Jarrell began his public service
with Chesterfield County as a Deputy on February 1, 1977 and has
faithfully served the County for twenty years; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Jarrell retired from the County on November 1,
1996; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Jarrell, through hard work and dedication,
held several positions in the Sheriff's Department; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Jarrell grew with the County and demonstrated
versatility and consistently provided the highest level of
customer service when working with internal and external
customers; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Jarrell, displayed a caring attitude toward
all of his customers, often going out of his way to help those
in need, and demonstrated excellent teamwork skills by always
being available to assist his coworkers; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Jarrell has demonstrated his loyalty to
Chesterfield County through his dedication and caring attitude.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Chesterfield County
Board of Supervisors publicly recognizes Mr. Rudolph J. Jarrell
for his outstanding contributions, expresses the appreciation of
all residents for his service to the County, and extends their
2/26/97
97-113
appreciation for his dedicated service to
congratulations upon his retirement, and th
a long and happy retirement.
AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that a cop5
be presented to Mr. Jarrell and that
permanently recorded among the papers
Supervisors of Chesterfield County, Virgini
Vote: Unanimous
Mrs. Humphrey and Mr. Ramsey presented the
to Deputy Jarrell, expressed appreciation
service to the County, and wished him well
Mr. Jarrell expressed appreciation for tl
stated that it has been a pleasure to wor
County.
5.B. RECOGNIZING SERGEANT WILLIS E. ALLEN
Mr. Hammer introduced Sergeant Willis E. Ail
to accept the resolution.
On motion of the Board, the following resol]
WHEREAS, Mr. Willis E. Allen began his '
Chesterfield County as a Deputy on July'
faithfully served the County for seventeen
WHEREAS, Mr. Allen retired from the Co
1996; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Allen, through hard wol
progressed from the position of Deputy to h~
as Sergeant; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Allen grew with the Count
versatility and consistently provided the
customer service when working with intel
customers; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Allen displayed a caring
of his customers, often going out of his wa
need, and demonstrated excellent teamwork ski
available to assist his coworkers; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Allen has demonstrate¢
Chesterfield County through his dedication a~
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the ~
Board of Supervisors publicly recognizes Mr
for his outstanding contributions, expresses
all residents for his service to the County
appreciation for his dedicated service to
congratulations upon his retirement, and th~
a long and happy retirement.
AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that a copy
be presented to Mr. Allen and that t~
permanently recorded among the papers
Supervisors of Chesterfield County, Virgini
Vote: Unanimous
Mrs. Humphrey and Mr. Ramsey presented the
to Sergeant Allen, expressed appreciation
service to the County, and wished him well
Mr. Allen expressed appreciation for the re
97-114
the County, their
~ir best wishes for
, of this resolution
his resolution be
)f this Board of
xecuted resolution
for his dedicated
in his retirement.
recognition and
for Chesterfield
JPON HIS RETIREMENT
Len who was present
~tion was adopted:
public service with
1, 1979 and has
'ears; and
~nty on November 1,
· k and dedication,
.s current position
y and demonstrated
highest level of
~nal and external
Lttitude toward all
y to help those in
lls by always being
[ his loyalty to
~d caring attitude.
2hesterfield County
· Willis E. Allen,
the appreciation of
and extends their
the County, their
~ir best wishes for
of this resolution
~is resolution be
.f this Board of
xecuted resolution
for his dedicated
.n his retirement.
:ognition.
2/26/97
6. WORK SESSIONS
There were no Work Sessions scheduled at this time.
7. DEFERRED ITEMS
There were no Deferred Items at this time.
8. NEW BUSINESS
8.A. STREETLIGHT INSTALLATION COST APPROVALS
On motion of Mr. McHale, seconded by Mr. Daniel, the Board
approved the following streetlight installation cost approvals:
Bermuda District
Wellington Farms Drive and Gravelneck Drive
Cost to install light: $714.72
Due to safety issues
Krenmore Lane and Wellington Farms Drive
Cost to install light: $607.65
Due to safety issues
Krenmore Lane and Kriserin Circle
Cost to install light: $851.43
Due to safety issues
Dale District
Benika Drive, 6 streetlights on existing poles,
between 5600 and 5654
~No cost to install lights.
Vote: Unanimous
8.B. APPOINTMENTS
On motion of Mr. McHale, seconded by Mr. Daniel, the Board
suspended, its rules at this time to allow simultaneous
nomination/appointment of members to serve on the Accident
Review Board and the Airport Advisory Board.
Vote: Unanimous
8.B.1. ACCIDENT REVIEW BOARD
On motion of Mrs. Humphrey, seconded by Mr. Barber, the Board
simultaneously nominated/appointed Lieutenant Marvin L. Starnes
to serve on the Accident Review Board whose term is effective
immediately and will be at the pleasure of the Board.
Vote: Unanimous
(It is noted that Lieutenant Starnes will fill the vacancy due
to the transfer of Lieutenant D. Courtney Griffin.)
8.B.2. AIRPORT ADVISORY BOARD
On motion of Mrs. Humphrey, seconded by Mr. Barber, the Board
simultaneously nominated/appointed Mr. John Lillard, to serve on
the Airport Advisory Board, whose term is effective immediately
and will expire February 14, 1998.
Vote: Unanimous
2/26/97
97-115
8.B.3. DISABILITIES SERVICES BOARD
On motion of Mr. McHale, seconded by Mr.
simultaneously nominated/reappointed Ms.
representing Bermuda District, to serve
Services Board, whose term is effective
expire December 31, 1998.
Vote: Unanimous
(It is noted that Ms. Bartley this action ]
taken at the February 14, 1997 Board of Super
she was nominated to serve as an Advis(
Disabilities Services Board.)
8.C. AUTHORIZATION FOR ADVERTISEMENT OF TA2
BUDGET PROCESS
Mr. Stegmaier stated that staff recommen
authorize staff to proceed with advertisemen~
and other ordinances relating to the budget ~
advertisements for the Capital Improvement
FY98 Annual Budget. He noted that the public
these items are tentatively scheduled for Ma]
p.m. at L. C. Bird High School. He stated t
be advertising an effective tax rate increas
the State Code, because of the increases i
have occurred in the past year. He furth
proposed budget will include recommendations
structures in the Planning, Environmental En
Inspection, and Utilities Departments. He s
also recommending a minor change in personal
for a specific class of property for motor
and semi-trailers with a gross weight of
which are used to transport property for hir~
engaged in interstate commerce. He noted tha
that the rate of that specific class of prop
rate for machinery and tools, which is cu~
stated that the Commissioner has requested
motor vehicles, trailers, and semi-trailers !
He further stated that other rates are co
practices and noted that, once a rate is ad~
does not have the flexibility to adopt
advertised rate, without going through an¢
process.
Mr. McHale inquired as to whether the rates,
advertising, permit the Board to adjust th
fee? Mr. Stegmaier stated that, if the Board
do an advertisement for the business lice
would allow the Board to adjust the fee.
There was brief discussion relative to the
business license fee; holding a public hearir
as the other budget public hearings, if ti
handle this as part of adopting the FY98 Bu(
placing this issue on a future Board agenda
Mr. Stegmaier clarified that the change in tl
tax fee would take affect for the FY98 busine
which begins in January, 1998 and approx~
$700,000, in anticipated revenue from BPOL, ~
this change.
When asked, Mr. Ramsey stated that the BPOI
implemented by the County last fall, took app
Barber, the Board
Shirley Bartley,
n the Disabilities
mediately and will
;etracts the action
visors meeting when
)ry member on the
RATES FOR THE FY98
~s that the Board
~s for the tax rates
.rocess, as well the
?rogram and for the
hearings regarding
· ch 26, 1997 at 7:00
nat staff will also
e, a requirement of
n assessments that
~r stated that the
for changes in fee
~ineering, Building
tared that staff is
property tax rates
Tehicles, trailers,
over 10,000 pounds
~ by a motor carrier
t the Code requires
srty not exceed the
3rently $1.00. He
that the rate for
)e set at .96 cents.
nsistent with past
~ertised, the Board
a rate above the
ther advertisement
that the Board are
e business license
desires, staff can
~se ordinance that
advertising of the
~g at the same time,
~e Board wishes to
~get; and the Board
to be discussed.
~e business license
ss license tax year
.mately $500,000 -
ould be affected by
changes that were
~oximately $700,000
in revenue from the BPOL tax.
97-116
2/26/97
Mr. Barber stated that when the State made changes in the BPOL
tax, the Board of Supervisors did its due diligence and
implemented tho~se regulations that were dictated by the change
that the General Assembly made in the BPOL tax. He further
stated that he feels it was not the General Assembly's intention
to double tax business owners -- establishing the floor of
$100,000 before anyone pays the BPOL tax and then instituting
the $100 flat fee for everyone. He stated that this created a
hardship for those that reached the $100,000 ceiling, who then
were paying their BPOL tax from the first dollar and also the
$100. He further stated that the General Assembly has mandated
that the County adjust this by eliminating the $100 fee in two
years, however, he feels it would be prudent on the part of the
Board of Supervisors to fully examine eliminating the $100 in
one year.
Mr. Warren stated that this issue seems to be an unfair approach
and appears to be double taxation and that the Board will
address this issue during the next few months.
Mr. Barber made a motion for the Board to authorize the
advertisement of tax rates and other ordinances, the Capital
Improvement Program (CIP), and the FY98 Budget for the FY98
Budget process.
Mr. Warren seconded the motion.
Mr. ~Daniel stated that he will support .the $1.09 to be
advertised because at this time it is in the best interest of
the County, however, he is disappointed because the County has
been on track to reduce the cost of government and to put the
County in the forefront of business managed counties. He
further stated that part of that forefront was to make positive
statements that the Board recognizes that it is because of the
taxpayers at-large that the County has achieved what the public
wants in terms of services. He stated that the Board needs to
have a sound approach to begin a conscientious move to decrease
this rate. He further stated that Chesterfield is currently the
heaviest tax rate urban County and that he hopes the Board can
agree on a method and process to reduce the $1.09 tax rate.
Mr. McHale stated that the Board has worked very diligently over
the past five years to position the County to begin a careful,
deliberate reduction of the County's residential tax rates. He
stated that the burden is now being placed on residential real
estate owners. He stated that this Board, in anticipation of
work that will done by the General Assembly, made changes to the
BPOL taxes that have lightened the load for businesses° He
further stated that the Board needs to begin the process of
reducing the tax rate. He stated that he prefers that the $1.08
tax rate was being advertised. He further stated that he feels
the County.has the finest school system in the area and that the
County has the most affordable housing available. He stated
that Henrico, Dinwiddie, and Prince George are selling
Chesterfield County schools and are taking away County
businesses; that he feels this trend needs to change; and that
reducing the residential tax rate is one way to turn this trend
around. He further stated that he will support the $1.09 to be
advertised, however, urged the Board to reconsider their
position on this issue.
Mr. Barber stated that he feels it is important that the Board
not compare Chesterfield to Henrico County as people are
choosing to live in Chesterfield because of the things
Chesterfield has to offer. He further stated that Chesterfield
has 13,000 more students in its schools than Henrico. He stated
that Chesterfield County government cost each individual less
than it cost individuals in Henrico County. He further stated
that it is important that the Board of Supervisors rely on the
shoulders of County employees as they carry a burden that is far
superior to their counterpart in other places, many times at
less pay. He stated that eighty-three percent of County
2/26/97
97-117
citizens voted to keep services at its current level on the
November, 1996 Bond Referendum, indicative Qf the fact that the
citizens are satisfied with the tax rate a~$1.09. He further
stated that he is confident that keeping ~he tax rate at its
current place is a very fiscally responsibl~position to be in;
that people are respective of the job and services received from
Chesterfield County Government and Schools~ He stated that he
does not feel the same motivation as his colleagues, however, he
does feel the Board should keep the County's service levels
where they are currently.
Mrs. Humphrey stated that she will support t
the $1.09 tax rate. She expressed concerns
meet some of the public safety needs in the
is reduced. She stated that the Board of S
fiscally responsible and that she is comfort
rate.
Mr. Warren expressed appreciation to the Bo.
in moving this issue forward. He stated t
tremendous momentum as it has implemented c.
through Total Quality Improvement and effic
He further stated that the Board will cont~
conservative and move the County forward.
Mr. Warren called for the vote, on the ~
Barber, seconded by him, for the Board
advertisement of tax rates and other ordir
Improvement Program (CIP), and the FY98 Bt
Budget process.
Vote: Unanimous
8,m,
CONSENT ITEMS
8.D.1. ADOPTION OF RESOLUTIONS
8.D.l.a. RECOGNIZING MARCH, 1997 AS "PURCH]
On motion of Mr. Barber, seconded by Mr.
adopted the following resolution:
WHEREAS, the purchasing profession has
in the quality, efficiency, and profitabilJ
government throughout the United States; an(
WHEREAS, in addition to the purchase of
the purchasing profession has responsibility
as executing, implementing, and adminis
developing forecasts and procurement strategi
working relationships with suppliers and witl
within the organization; and
WHEREAS, the purchasing profession has t
on the economic conditions in the Unite(
accumulative purchasing power running int,
dollars; and
WHEREAS, the County of Chesterfield
member and supporter of the National Instit~
Purchasing (NIGP), which is a non-profi'
technical society of purchasing departme~
United States, Canada, Puerto Rico, and the
WHEREAS, the National Institute of Gover
and other associations around the globe, are
and special events to further educate and
public on the role of purchasing within busi]
government.
he advertisement of
how the Board will
County if the rate
~pervisors are very
able with the $1.09
~rd for their unity
hat the County has
)st-saving measures
[ency improvements.
.nue to be fiscally
~otion made by Mr.
to authorize the
ances, the Capital
]dget for the FY98
~SING MONTH"
McHale, the Board
a significant role
ty of business and
oods and services,
for functions such
.tering contracts,
es, and development
~ other departments
~emendous influence
States, with an
the billions of
~s been a charter
[te of Governmental
- educational and
ts throughout the
;irgin Islands; and
3mental Purchasing,
holding activities
inform the general
less, industry, and
2/26/97
97-118
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Chesterfield County
Board of Supervisors hereby recognizes March, 1997 as
"Purchasing Month" for the County and calls to the attention of
all citiZens the economic importance of purchasing contributions
to Chesterfield County.
Vote: Unanimous
8.D.l.b.
REQUESTING LICENSURE OF TWO ADDITIONAL BEDS
AT THE YOUTH GROUP HOME AND REIMBURSEMENT FOR
CONSTRUCTION COSTS
On motion of Mr. Barber, seconded by Mr. McHale, the Board
adoPted the following resolution:
WHEREAS, the Chesterfield Youth Group Home has a
cooperative agreement to serve youth from Henrico County and
Colonial Heights; and
WHEREAS, the Chesterfield Youth Group Home has available
bed space.
NOW, THEREFORE BE.IT RESOLVED, that the Chesterfield County
Board of Supervisors supports and encourages approval by the
Virginia' Board of Juvenile Justice to expand the licensed
capacity of the Chesterfield Youth Group Home from fourteen to
sixteen Youth.
AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors
requests the BOard of Juvenile Justice to reimburse Chesterfield
CountY for the construction cost for these newly licensed beds°
Vote: Unanimous
8.D.l.c. ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION RECOGNIZING MS. BECKY D. YORK
UPON HER RETIREMENT
On'motion of Mr. Barber, seconded by Mr. McHale, the Board
adopted the following resolution:
WHEREAS, Ms. Becky D. York, Human Resources Technician, has
faithfully'served the Chesterfield-Colonial Heights Department
of Social Services for twenty-one years; and
WHEREAS, by providing quality public service, Ms. York has
symbolized the type of employees Chesterfield County seeks; and
WHEREAS, Ms. York has shown tremendous knowledge regarding
the Department and its programs and the ability to relate that
knowledge to others; and
WHEREAS, Ms. York's desire to do a good job has been a
primary factor that has permitted her to perform at a very high
level while always striving for excellence and going beyond the
call of duty; and
WHEREAS, Ms. York has been extremely effective in working
with agency co-workers and all County employees.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Chesterfield County
Board of Supervisors publicly recognizes the outstanding
contributions of Ms. Becky D. York and extends their
appreciation for her dedicated service to the County, their
congratulations upon her retirement, and their best wishes for
a long and happy retirement.
2/26/97
97-119
AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that a cop5
be presented to Ms. York and that this resolu
recorded among the papers of this Board
Chesterfield County, Virginia.
Vote: Unanimous
8.D.2.
APPROVAL OF AUTOMATIC INTERJURISDIC'
FIREFIGHTING-AID AGREEMENT BETWEEN
AND THE CITY OF RICHMOND
On motion of Mr. Barber, seconded by Mr.
approved an Automatic Interjurisdictiona
Agreement between Chesterfield County and th
(It is noted a copy of the Agreement is filed
this Board.)
Vote: Unanimous
8.D.3.
' of this resolution
tion be permanently
of Supervisors of
AUTHORIZATION FOR POLICE DEPARTMENT
GRANTS
8.D.3.a. TO PROVIDE CONTINUED FUNDING FOR
FUNDS, AND EQUIPMENT FOR DRUG ENF~
PROSECUTION
On motion of Mr. Barber, seconded by Mr.
authorized the Police Department to apply fo~
to provide continued funding for overtime, o
equipment of drug enforcement and prosecutior
the necessary funds when approved.
Vote: Unanimous
8.D.3.b.
TO PROVIDE FUNDING FOR THREE SWOR]
OFFICERS FOR LOCAL HIGH SCHOOLS
On motion of Mr. Barber, seconded by Mr.
authorized the Police Department to apply fo
one year federal Department of Criminal Jus~
to provide funding for three sworn School Re
local high schools and to appropriate th
awarded.
Vote: Unanimous
8.D.3 .c.
TO PROVIDE FUNDING FOR PRODUCTION
SEGMENTS
On motion of Mr. Barber, seconded by Mr.
authorized the Police Department to apply fo
Department of Criminal Justice Services grant
for production of Crime Solvers segments and
necessary grant funds, if awarded.
Vote: Unanimous
8.D.4.
STATE ROAD ACCEPTANCE
This day the County Environmental Engineer,
directions from this Board, made report ii
examination of the road in Walthall Creek,
District, and
Whereas, the Resident Engineer for the Vir(
Transportation has advised the Director-
Engineering, the street in Walthall Creek,
97-120
~IONAL
~HESTERFIELD COUNTY
McHale, the Board
Firefighting-Aid
City of Richmond.
with the papers of
O APPLY FOR VARIOUS
)VERTIME, OPERATING
)RCEMENT AND
McHale, the Board
' two federal grants
oerating funds, and
and to appropriate
SCHOOL RESOURCE
McHale, the Board
u continuation of a
:ice Services grant
~ource Officers for
~ grant funds, if
OF CRIME SOLVERS
McHale, the Board
continuation of a
to provide funding
to appropriate the
in accordance with
writing upon his
ection 14, Bermuda
inia Department of
of Environmental
;ection 14, Bermuda
2/26/97
District, meets the requirements established by the Subdivision
Street Requirements of the Virginia Department of
Transportation; and
Whereas, the County and the Virginia Department of
Transportation have entered into an agreement, recorded in Deed
Book 2453, Page 405, January 21, 1994, for all stormwater
detention/retention facilities in the County.
Therefore, upon consideration whereof, and on motion of Mr.
Barber, seconded by Mr. McHale, it is resolved that the road in
Walthall Creek~ Section 14, Bermuda District, be and it hereby
is established as a public road.
And be it further resolved, that the Virginia Department of
Transportation, be and is hereby requested to take into the
Secondary System, pursuant to Section 33.1-229, Code of
Virginia, and the Department's Subdivision Street Requirements,
the following:
Name of Street: Wood Duck Lane Length: 0.23 mile
From: Cul'de-sac, 0.24 mile southwest
of Clear Springs Lane, State Route 4064
To: Existing Wood Duck Lane, State Route 4062, 0.01 mile
southwest of Clear Springs Lane, State Route 4064
Guaranteed Right-of-Way Width: 50 feet.
This request is inclusive of the adjacent slope, sight distance,
clear zone, and designated Virginia Department of Transportation
drainage easements indicated on the development plat.
This road serves 16 lots.
This section of Walthall Creek is recorded as follows:
Section 14, Plat Book 83, Pages 17 and 18, January 12, 1994.
Vote: Unanimous
This day the County Environmental Engineer, in accordance with
directions from this Board, made report in writing upon his
examination of the roads in Hilmar, Section D, Dale District,
and
Whereas, the Resident Engineer for the Virginia Department of
Transportation has advised the Director of Environmental
Engineering, the streets in Hilmar, Section D, Dale District,
meet the requirements established by the Subdivision Street
Requirements of the Virginia Department of Transportation, and
Whereas, the County and the Virginia Department of
Transportation have entered into an agreement, recorded in Deed
Book 2453, Page 405, January 21, 1994, for all stormwater
detention/retention facilities in the County.
Therefore, upon consideration whereof, and on motion of Mr.
Barber, seconded by Mr. McHale, it is resolved that the roads in
Hilmar, Section D, Dale District, be and they hereby are
established as public ~roads.
And be it further resolved, that the Virginia Department of
Transportation, be and is hereby requested to take into the
Secondary System, pursuant to Section 33.1-229, Code of
Virginia, and the Department's Subdivision Street Requirements,
the following:
Name of Street: Pineleaf Drive
From: Beulah Road, State Route 641,
' 0.14 mile west of Hilmar Drive,
State Route 3192
Length: 0.34 mile
2/26/97
97-121
To: Winterleaf Drive, 0.02 mile east
of existing Winterleaf Drive,
State Route 3295
Guaranteed Right-of-Way Width: 50 feet.
Name of Street: Cypressleaf Drive
From: Pineleaf Drive, 0.06 mile
north of Beulah Road, State Route 641
To: Yellowleaf Drive, State Route 3193,
0.03 mile west of Hilmar Drive,
State Route 3192
Guaranteed Right-of-Way Width: 50 feet.
Name of Street: Winterleaf Drive
From: Existing Winterleaf Drive,
State Route 3295, 0.02 mile
west of Pineleaf Drive
To: Existing Winterleaf Drive,
State Route 1973, 0.07 mile
east of Pineleaf Drive
Guaranteed Right-of-Way Width: 50 feet.
This request is inclusive of the adjacent slo
clear zone, and designated Virginia Departmen
drainage easements indicated on the developr
These roads serve 71 lots.
This section of Hilmar is recorded as follo%
Section D, Plat Book 80, Pages 15 and 16, J~
Vote: Unanimous
8.D.5. AMENDMENTS TO BOARD MINUTES OF JANU;
On motion of Mr. Barber, seconded by Mr.
amended the minutes of January 22, 1997 as
FROM:
"This day the County Environmental Engineer,
directions from this Board, made report
examination of the road in Windsor Park,
District, and
Whereas, the Resident Engineer for the Vir¢
Transportation has advised the Director
Engineering, the street in Windsor Park, ~
District, meets the requirements established
Street Requirements of the Virginia
Transportation, and
Whereas, the County and the Virgini
Transportation have entered into an agreemen'
Book
2453, Page 405, January 21, 1994,
Length: 0.15 mile
Length: 0.09 mile
pe, sight distance,
t of Transportation
lent plat.
~s:
Lnuary 22, 1993.
~Y 22, 1997
McHale, the Board
'ollows:
in accordance with
writing upon his
lection 4, Matoaca
inia Department of
of Environmental
~ection 4, Matoaca
by the Subdivision
Department of
~ Department of
2, recorded in Deed
~or all stormwater
detention/retention facilities in the Counts
Therefore, upon consideration whereof, and
McHale, seconded by Mr. Daniel, it is resolv4
Windsor Park, Section 4, Matoaca District,
established as a public road.
And be it further resolved, that the Virg~
Transportation, be and is hereby requested
Secondary System, pursuant to Section ~
Virginia, and the Department's Subdivision S~
the following:
97-122
on motion of Mr.
~d that the road in
and it hereby is
nia Department of
to take into the
3.1-229, Code of
~reet Requirements,
2/26/97
Name of Street: Sylvan Ridge Road
From: Temporary cul-de-sac, 0.66 mile
west of Prince Philip Lane,
State Route 4356
To: Existing Sylvan Ridge Road,
State Route 4358, 0.50 mile
west of Prince Philip Lane,
State Route 4356
Guaranteed Right-of-Way Width: 50 feet.
Length: 0.16 mile
This request iS.inclusive of the adjacent slope, sight distance,
clear zone, and designated Virginia Department of Transportation
drainage easements indicated on the development plat.
This road.serves 12 lots.
This section of Windsor Park is recorded as follows:
Section 4, Plat Book 84, Pages 49 and 50, June 7, 1994o
Vote: Unanimous"
TO:
"This day the County Environmental Engineer, in accordance with
directions from this Board, made report in writing upon his
examination of the road in Windsor Park, Section 4, Matoaca
District,-and
Whereas, the Resident Engineer for the Virginia Department of
Transportation has advised the Director of Environmental
Engineering, the street in Windsor Park, Section 4, Matoaca
District, meets the requirements established by the Subdivision
Street Requirements of the Virginia Department of
Transportation, and
Whereas, the County and the Virginia Department of
Transportation have entered into an agreement, recorded in Deed
Book 2453, Page 405, January 21, 1994, for all stormwater
detention/retention facilities in the County.
Therefore, upon consideration whereof, and on motion of Mr.
McHale, seconded by Mr. Daniel, it is resolved that the road in
Windsor Park, Section 4, Matoaca District, be and it hereby is
established as a public road.
And be it further resolved, that the Virginia Department of
Transportation, be and is hereby requested to take into the
Secondary System, pursuant to Section 33.1-229, Code of
Virginia, and the Department's Subdivision Street Requirements,
the following:
Name of Street: Sylvan Ridge Road
From: Temporary cul-de-sac, 0.54 mile
west of Prince Philip Lane,
State Route 4356
To: Existing Sylvan Ridge Road,
State Route 4358, 0.38 mile
west of Prince Philip Lane,
State Route 4356
Guaranteed Right-of-Way Width: 50 feet.
Length: 0.16 mile
This request is inclusive of the adjacent slope, sight distance,
clear zone, and designated Virginia Department of Transportation
drainage easements indicated on the development plat.
This road serves 12 lots.
This section of Windsor Park is recorded as follows:
97-123
2/26/97
Section 4, Plat Book 84, Pages 49 and 50, J~
Vote: Unanimous"
Vote: Unanimous
8.D.6.
AUTHORIZATION TO TRANSFER FUNDS FOR
BUSINESS CENTER INDUSTRIAL ACCESS Pt
On motion of Mr. Barber, seconded by Mr.
transferred $225,000 from the Industrial Acc
Rivers Bend Business Center Industrial Acces
understanding the funds will be returned t~
fulfilling of the surety obligation.
Vote: Unanimous
8.D.7.
AUTHORIZATION FOR THE VIRGINIA DEPA~
SERVICES TO SUBMIT A GRANT PROPOSAL ~
VIRGINIA FAMILY VIOLENCE PREVENTION
APPROPRIATION OF FUNDS
On motion of Mr. Barber, seconded by Mr.
authorized the Virginia Department of Social
a grant proposal for funding from the Virgin
Prevention program, in the amount of $34,322
position; and to appropriate funds if grant
Vote: Unanimous
8.D.8.
TRANSFER OF THREE CENT ROAD FUNDS
8.D.8.a. BERMUDA DISTRICT FOR ROAD REPAIRS
STREET
On motion of Mr. Barber, seconded by Mr.
transferred $550 in Bermuda District Three (
the Transportation Department for road repai
Street.
Vote: Unanimous
8.D.8.b.
DALE DISTRICT TO PURCHASE PLAYGROUi
O. B. GATES ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
On motion of Mr. Barber, seconded by Mr.
transferred $2,500 in Dale District Three Cen~
School Board to purchase playground equipm~
Elementary School.
Vote: Unanimous
8.D.9.
REQUEST TO QUITCLAIM A TWENTY FOOT
EASEMENT ACROSS PROPERTY OWNED BY MU
On motion of Mr. Barber, seconded by Mr
authorized the Chairman of the Board of Su
County Administrator to execute a quitclaim
twenty foot temporary drainage easement acros~
Mulberry Corporation. (It is noted a copy of
with the papers of this BOard.)
Vote: Unanimous
lne 7, 1994.
THE RIVERS BEND
:OJECT
McHale, the Board
~ss Account for the
s surety, with the
the Account upon
TMENT OF SOCI~T.
FUNDING FROM T~E
PROGRAM AND
McHale, the Board
Services to submit
ia Family Violence
; to establish one
is awarded.
9N TAPPAHANNOCK
McHale, the Board
~ent Road Funds to
us on Tappahannock
~D EQUIPMENT AT
~cHale, the Board
Road Funds to the
~nt at O.B. Gates
~EMPORARY DRAINAGE
5BERRY CORPORATION
KcHale, the Board
)ervisors and the
deed to vacate a
property owned by
the plat is filed
97-124
2/26/97
8.D.10. REQUEST FOR PERMISSION
8.D. 10.a. FROM LINDA J. DRESSLER AND T. ALLEN KELLY TO
CONSTRUCT A GRAVEL DRIVEWAY AND PRIVATE
GAS LINE WITHIN AN EXISTING FIFTY FOOT UNIMPROVED
RIGHT-OF-WAY
On motion of Mr. Barber, seconded by Mr. McHale, the Board
approved a request from Linda J. Dressler and T. Allen Kelly to
construct a gravel driveway and private gas line within an
existing fifty foot unimproved right-of-way, subject to the
execution of a license agreement. (It is noted a copy of the
vicinity sketch is filed with the papers of this Board.)
Vote: Unanimous
8.D.10.b. FROM BARBARA ELLISON MARSHALL AND OLA E. THOMAS TO
INSTALL A GRAVEL DRIVEWAY ON COUNTY PROPERTY
On motion of Mr. Barber, seconded by Mr. McHale, the Board
approved a request from Barbara' Ellison Marshall and Ola E.
Thomas to install a gravel driveway on County property north of
Ecoff Avenue at the terminus of Quay Street, subject to the
execution of a license agreement. (It is noted a copy of the
vicinity sketch is filed with the papers of this Board.)
Vote: Unanimous
8.D.11. ACCEPTANCE OF A PARCELS OF LANn
8.D.11.a. ALONG GENITO ROAD FROM RESERVOIR DEVELOPMENT
CORPORATION
On motion of Mr. Barber, seconded by Mr. McHale, the Board
accepted the conveyance of a parcel of land containing 0.560
acres along Genito Road (State Route 604) from Reservoir
Development Corporation and authorized the County Administrator
to execute the necessary deed. (It is noted a copy of the plat
is filed with the papers of this Board.)
Vote: Unanimous
8.D.11.b. ALONG JEFFERSON DAVIS HIGHWAY FROM WILLIE O. GRUBB
AND FRANCES B. GRUBB
On motion of Mr. Barber, seconded by Mr. McHale, the Board
accepted the conveyance of a parcel of land containing 0.383
acres along Jefferson Davis Highway (U.S. Route 1 & 301) from
Willie O. Grubb and Frances B. Grubb and authorized the County
Administrator to execute the necessary deed. (It is noted a
copy of the plat is filed with the papers of this Board.)
Vote: Unanimous
8.D.11.c. ALONG GENITO ROAD FROM RESERVOIR LAND ASSOCIATES
On motion of Mr. Barber, seconded by Mr. McHale, the Board
accepted the conveyance of two parcels of land containing a
total of 0.36 acres ± along Genito Road (State Route 604) from
Reservoir Land Associates and authorized the County
Administrator to execute the necessary deed. (It is noted a
copy of the plat is filed with the papers of this Board.)
Vote: Unanimous
2/26/97
97-125
8.D.11.d. ALONG GENITO ROAD FROM MOUNT HERM
On motion of Mr. Barberi seconded by Mr.
accepted the conveyance of a parcel of lan(
acres adjacent to and south of the centerl~
from Mount Hermon Baptist Church and auth
Administrator to execute the necessary deed
copy of the plat is filed with the papers of
Vote: Unanimous
8.D.11.e. ALONG GENITO ROAD FROM IRVING. H
On motion of Mr. Barber, seconded by Mr.
accepted the conveyance of a parcel of lan(
acres adjacent to and south of the centerl~
from Irvin G. Horner and authorized the Count
execute the necessary deed. (It is noted a
filed with the papers of this Board.)
Vote: Unanimous
8.D.11.f. ALONG OLD HUNDRED ROAD AND ALONG
WILLIAM W. STONEr J. KENNETH TIMMO
GOODE, TRUSTEES OF ROSE TRUST
On motion of Mr. Barber, seconded by Mr.
accepted the conveyance of four parcels
containing 1.8 acres +, one containing 0.
containing 10.5 acres ±~all along Old Hundre
652), and one containing~0.7 acres ± along
Route 604) from William W. Stone, J. Kenneth
Read F. Goode, Trustees of Rose Trust, and au~
Administrator to execute the necessary deed
copy of the plats are filed with the papers
Vote: Unanimous
8.D.12.
APPROVAL OF WATER CONTRACT FOR THE
BERMUDA HUNDRED ROAD PROJECT
On motion of Mr. Barber, seconded by Mr.
approved the following water contract for
Bermuda Hundred Road Project, which pro]
extension of 816 L.F. of 12 inch water line
County Administrator to execute any necessa~
Developer 423 Third Stre~
Contractor: Mayton ConstI
Contract Amount: Estimated Total -
Total Estimated County Cost:
Water (Oversizing)
(Cash Refund)
Estimated Developer Cost:
Code: (Cash Refund) - Oversizing
District: Bermuda
Vote: Unanimous
DN BAPTIST CHURCH
McHale, the Board
containing 0.056
ne of Genito Road
prized the County
(It is noted a
this Board.)
IRNER
(cHale, the Board
! containing 0.613
.ne of Genito Road
y Administrator to
:opy of the plat is
GENITO ROAD FROM
NS, JR. AND READ F.
McHale, the Board
of land -- one
412 acres ±, one
~ Road (State Route
Senito Road (State
Timmons, Jr., and
~horized the County
· (It is noted a
of this Board.)
CITY ICE - OLD
McHale, the Board
~he City Ice - Old
lect includes the
and authorized the
y documents:
~t Associates, L.P.
uction, Inc.
$35,000.00
97-126
9,270.20
25,729.80
5B-572WO-E4C
2/26/97
8.D.13. AUTHORIZATION FOR THE CHESTERFIELD COMMUNITY SERVICE~
BOARD TO APPLY FOR A DOMESTIC VIOLENCE COUNSELIN~
SERVICE GRANT, ESTABLISH ONE FULL-TIME POSITION,
AND ACCEPT AND APPROPRIATE FUNDS
On motion of Mr. Barber, seconded by Mr. McHale, the Board
authorized the Chesterfield Community Services Board to apply
for a Domestic Violence Counseling Service Grant, in the amount
of $68,863 (includes $50,278 State/Federal and $18,585 match);
to establish one full-time Senior Clinician position; and accept
and appropriate funds, if awarded.
Vote: Unanimous
8.D.14. SET DATE FOR A PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER CHANGING THE
EFFECTIVE DATE OF THE INCREASE IN THR E-911 TAY
On motion of Mr. Barber, seconded by Mr. McHale, the Board set
the date of March 26, 1997 at 7:00 p.m. for a public hearing to
consider changing the effective date of the increase in the E-
911 tax.
Vote: Unanimous
8.D.15. ALLOCATION OF FUNDS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF NEW LIG~'TIN~
SYSTEMS AT ROCKWOOD PARK AND MIDLOTHIAN MIDDLE SCHOOL
On motion of Mr. Barber, seconded by Mr.
allocated $120,000 from the' Capital
construction of new lighting systems at
Midlothian Middle School.
Vote: Unanimous
McHale, the Board
Reserve Fund for
Rockwood park and
9. HEARINGS OF CITIZENS ON UNSCHEDULED MATTERS OR CLAIMm
There were no Hearings of Citizens on Unscheduled Matters or
Claims at this time.
10. REPORTS
On motion of Mr. Barber, seconded by Mr. McHale, the Board
accepted the following reports:
A report on Developer Water and Sewer Contracts and a status
report on the General Fund Balance; Reserve for Future Capital
Projects; District Road and Street Light Funds; Lease Purchases;
and School Board Agenda.
And, further, the Board accepted the following roads into the
State Secondary System:
ADDITIONS
LENGTH
ASHBROOK, SECTION 5 - (Effective 1-31-97)
Route 4202 (Ashbrook Parkway) - From Route 4209
to 0.01 mile West Route 4203
0.27 Mi
Route 4212 (Shady Banks Court) - From Route 4209
to 0.05 mile Southeast Route 4209
0.O5 Mi
Route 4209 (Shady Banks Drive) - From 0.24 mile
South Route 4202 to Route 4202
0.24 Mi
Route 4213 (Shady Banks Road) - From Route 4209
to Route 4214
0.03 Mi
2/26/97
97-127
Route 4214 (Shady Banks Terrace) - From 0.10
mile South Route 4213 to 0.07 mile North
Route 4213
BIRKDALE, SECTIONS 1,2 - (Effective 1/9/97)
Route 5021 (Ainsdale Lane) - From Route 5029
to 0.20 mile Northeast Route 5029
Route 5028 (Old Bond Court) - From Route 502~
to 0.03 mile Northeast Route 5027
Route 5027 (Old Bond Street)~ - From Route
5021 to 0.27 mile Northeast Route 5021
Route 5024 (Royal Birkdale Drive) - From
Route 5024 to Route 5029
Route 5029 (Turning Lane) - From Route 5021
to 0.08 mile North Route 5021
HAMPSTEAD PLACE, SECTION 2 - (Effective 1/31
Route 4962 (Old Hampstead Court) - From
0.16 mile South Route 4963 to Route 4963
Vote: Unanimous
11. DINNER
On motion of Mr. Barber, seconded by Mr.
recessed to the Administration Building, Roo~
meeting with the Committee on the Future.
Vote: Unanimous
The Board of Supervisors met with members ol
the Future to discuss the Committee's current
focus on County youth.
Ms. Dorothy Jaeckle, chairman of the Commit'
reviewed the future report's vision and missJ
report work plan, schedule, and the stat~
project. She stated that the Committee we
public input in conjunction with the report
1997. She noted that the projected compl6
report is March, 1998 and the Committee
presentation to the Board in April, 1998.
The Board expressed appreciation to the CI
presentation and for Undertaking such an imf
Mr. stith then reported on the status of
recommendations, which are being impleme]
Development departments.
It was generally agreed to'adjourn to the ~
Board of Supervisors meeting.
Reconvening:
12. INVOCATION
Mr. Wayne Martin, Pasto]
invocation.
of the Upper Roo~
97-128
0.17 Mi
0.20 Mi
0.03 Mi
0.27 Mi
0.14 Mi
'97)
0.08 Mi
0.16 Mi
McHale, the Board
502, for a dinner
! the Committee on
report, which will
see' on the Future,
on statements, the
is report for the
~uld be collecting
during early fall,
tion date for the
hopes to make its
Immittee for their
ortant issue.
orevious Committee
.ted by Community
mgularly scheduled
Chapel, gave the
2/26/97
13. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG OF THE UNITED STATES OF
AMERICA
Mr. Russell Gulley, Clover Hill District Planning Commissioner,
led the Pledge of Allegiance to the United States of America°
14. RESOLUTIONS AND SPECIAL RECOGNITION~
14.A. PRESENTATION OF THE ANTHOLOGY BOOKLET OF ESSAY WINNERU
FROM THE LIBRARY AND FRIENDS ESSAY CONTEST
Dr. Wagenknecht introduced Ms. Mary Ann Harmon, President of the
Friends of the Library.
Ms. Harmon expressed appreciation to Bell Atlantic for
sponsoring the Library and Friends Essay Contest last spring.
She presented copies of the Anthology to the Board of
Supervisors and introduced Mr. John Lanier, Jr., Miss Courtney
Ward, and Mr. Cameron Baughn, essay contest winners.
Mr. Warren congratulated the essay winners and expressed
appreciation to the Friends of the Library for their efforts and
support of this endeavor.
14.B. RECOGNIZING SUPER RADIATOR COILS AS THE 1996 MEDIUM
BUSINESS RECIPIENT OF THE CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BUSINESS
APPRECIATION AND RECOGNITION AWARD
Mr. Stith introduced Mr. Ray Birk, representing Super Radiator
Coils, who was present to accept the resolution.
On motion of the Board, the following resolution was adopted:
WHEREAS, the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors
established a Business Appreciation and Recognition Award to
recognize existing businesses within the County that contribute
to the County's economy and its citizens; and
WHEREAS, Super Radiator Coils began its operation in
Chesterfield in 1980 with 25,000 square feet and 18 employees;
and
WHEREAS, by increasing penetration into the niche markets,
Super Radiator Coils was able to achieve a thirty percent growth
rate in 1992; doubled the size of its Chesterfield Plant from
25,000 to 50,000 square feet in 1993; .and continued to increase
the growth rate with a 23 percent increase in 1995 and a 7
percent increase in 1996; and
WHEREAS, Super Radiator Coils is preparing for the future
by planning another expansion within the next couple of years
which will increase the square footage from 50,000 to 100,000
square feet and once the expansion is completed, employment is
expected to increase from 65 employees to a high of 175
employees; and
WHEREAS, Super Radiator Coils is a manufacturer of heat
transfer coils, similar to those used in residential air
conditioners and currently are a major supplier of coils used in
the manufacture of refrigerated display cases by Hill PHOENIX,
another Chesterfield company; and
WHEREAS, Super Radiator Coils is a constant supporter of
the Chesterfield County business community through their
involvement and support of the Southport Association and the
Chesterfield Business Council and company representatives have
consistently acted as "Good Will Ambassadors" to visiting
prospects on behalf of Chesterfield Economic Development; and
2/26/97
97-129
WHEREAS, Super Radiator Coils has sp
activities including the Monacan Post Pa
Volunteers, Chesterfield Firefighters, Cheste
the Reams PTA.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that
County Board of Supervisors hereby expresses
behalf of the County, to Super Radiator Coi
contributions.
AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Bc
publicly recognizes Super Radiator Coils a~
Business recipient of the Chesterfield
Appreciation and Recognition Award.
Vote: Unanimous
Mr. Barber presented the executed resolutio
silver plate to Mr. Birk, congratulated him
expressed appreciation for their contributiol
County, and wished them well in their future
Mr. Birk expressed appreciation for the reco¢
opportunity to locate in the County.
15.
15 .A.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
TO CONSIDER THE CONVEYANCE OF A PARC!
COMPOSITION COMPANY, IN THE AIRPORT IN]
AMENDED PRICE
onsored community
'om, Forest View
field Police, and
the Chesterfield
its gratitude, on
[s for their many
~rd of Supervisors
the 1996 Medium
County Business
and an engraved
on their success,
~s to Chesterfield
endeavors.
~ition and for the
,, TO COGHILL
)USTRIAL PARK AT/tN
Mr. Stith stated that this date and time has
a public hearing to consider the conveyan¢
Coghill Composition Company in the Airport In(
amended purchase price. He further stated
price was $57,500 per acre and that the rI
price now is $46,906.78 per acre, which
$25,000 of the original price.
No one came forward to speak in favor of or
On motion of Mr. Daniel, seconded by Mr.
authorized the conveyance of a 2.36 ~cre par
Airport Industrial Park (Airpark) to Co
Company, in the amount of $46,906.78 per
typesetting facility to operate its business
County Administrator to execute the contract
Vote: Unanimous
15 .B.
TO CONSIDER AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE
OF CHESTERFIELD, 1978, AS ~RNDED, BY
21.1-152, 21.1-159, 21.1-160, 21.1-17
21.1-281 RELATING TO DEFINITIONS OF,
FOR, CERTAIN BUSINESSES AND PROFESSIC
Mr. William Poole stated that this date
advertised for a public hearing tocons
relating to definitions of, and use categ¢
businesses and professions. He further
amendment acknowledges that certain uses c~
affect on business investments located arour
that the Planning Commission and staff recomm
proposed
k~een advertised for
le of a parcel to
~ustrial Park at an
that the original
~commended selling
.s a reduction of
gainst this issue.
McHale, the Board
cel of land in the
ghill Composition
:e, to construct a
and authorized the
documents.
CODE OF THE COUNTY
AMENDIN~ SECTION~
3, 21.1-176 AND
AND USE CATEGORIES
NS
~nd time has been
Lder an ordinance
~ries for, certain
stated that the
~n have a negative
.d them. He stated
end approval of the
ordinance. He noted .that the crdinance would be
applicable County-wide, Dot only along port
Turnpike. He stated tha~ the ordinance wou]
of the businesses or professions from locatJ
County, but would allow them to develop witk
in C-5 zoning districts that would afford an .
community to be involvedi in the process and
Supervisors and the Planning Commission a
97-130
ions of Midlothian
d not prohibit any
.ng in Chesterfield
, a Conditional Use
)pportunity for the
give the Board of
chance to develop
2/26/97
appropriate conditions to guide the development of those
businesses on a case by case basis. He stated that if the Board
adopts this ordinance, other portions of the County Code will
need minor modifications for consistency reasons.
Mr. John Easter, a member of the Gateway Business Association,
stated that they support the' proposed ordinance; that this
process has been indicative of ~good partnership between the
County and business; and that he feels adoption of the proposed
ordinance will assist in the vitality of the Midlothian
Corridor.
There being no one else to address this ordinance, the public
hearing was closed.
Mr. Poole clarified that consignment automobile car sales are
defined as a business whose primary purpose is the selling of
other peoples' vehicles. He stated that this ordinance would
not affect them and that any current business, that is legal
today, would become non-conforming. He further stated that if
any business is not legal, this ~ordinance will have no affect
and staff will work with the business to bring them to
compliance. He briefly reviewed the process in which businesses
will have to follow if they are found to be operating an illegal
business.
Mrs. Humphrey expressed concerns relative to there being Matoaca
District constituents that have not had a chance to review this
ordinance who will be affected. She stated that if the Board is
set on moving forward at this time, she would like staff to meet
with her constituents to review this ordinance.
Mr. Warren stated that the message, as he understands, is that
the proposed ordinance will have no negative nor positive impact
on the business that Mrs. Humphrey has concerns. He further
stated that the Board will respect Mrs. Humphrey's view if she
feels there is a need for a delay in implementing this
ordinance.
When asked, Mr. Poole stated that the Planning Commission
unanimously supported the proposed ordinance and the business
community also supports the ordinance.
When asked, Mr. Poole stated~that if businesses are operating
legal, the ordinance will make them legally non-conforming and
they can continue to operate their business. He further stated
that no business will be displaced with a change in ordinance
and that businesses operating illegally will be required to
obtain proper zoning, which would be the case without the
ordinance amendment.
Mr. Daniel stated that the ordinance ~annot address the fact
that a business is currently illegal and that the types of
questions that~have been raised appear to be those that could be
answered administratively. He further stated that he will not
be present at the next Board meeting; that he would like to see
the ordinance adopted this evening; that he feels this is a good
ordinance; and that adoption of this ordinance is long overdue.
Mr. Daniel then made a motion for the Board to adopt an
ordinance relating to definitions of, and use categories for,
certain businesses and professions.
Mr. Barber seconded the motion.
Mr. McHale stated that the language "teal leaf readers" in
Section 21.1-176 (j) in the proposed ordinance should read "tea
leaf readers".
2/26/97
97-131
Mr. Barber stated that there is some concer~
preserve the current high standards in the Cou
changes. He further stated that not all of ~
the proposed ordinance are necessarily bad u
the uses listed are excluded from locating in
that the proposed ordinance would require th
conscious decision in whether to allow cert
locate in the County. He referenced a pawn :
Turnpike in which he has~ visited and state~
such as these deserve an opportunity. He sta
will have to scrutinize these types of aPl
future and that these types of businesses a]
excluded, however, will get the scrutiny ~
Supervisors in order to get a Conditional ~
business. He further stated he feels adoptior
will allow the Board to have'a lot of discI
business corridors throughout the County vial
much stronger voice in how development contim
business corridors.
Mrs. Humphrey expressed concerns about apl
located along the eastern Midlothian corrid~
been a resident of the County for over fifty ~
an establishment for twenty-five years, and h~
stated that if this ordinance is adopted, th~
affected.
When asked, Mr. Poole stated that staff is
with the owner of the business in which
expressed concern. He stated that he suspec
conforming today because it does not co~
setbacks and other development standards.
that he is unsure of the zoning on the prope
is C-5 zoning. He stated that he feels the
will have no impact on the consignment/automo]
He stated that any use that is rendered non-¢
ordinance, will not require that the busin
application and that they could continue opel
without rezoning. He further stated that he
the zoning and use of the business in questi
to Mrs. Humphrey. He stated that if there
staff will also meet with the property owner
Mr. Warren called for the vote on the motion]
seconded by Mr. Barber, for the Board to a~
ordinance:
AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE CODE OF ~
OF CHESTERFIELD, 1978, AS AMENDED, £
SECTIONS 21.1-152, 21.1-159, 21.1-160, 21.
AND 21.1-281 RELATING TO DEFINITIO~
USE CATEGORIES FOR CERTAIN BUSINESSES Al
BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervis.
County:
(1) That Sections 21.152, 159,
21.1-281 of the Code of the County of Ches
amended, is amended to read as follows:
Sec. 21.1-152. Permitted uses--By riqht.
Within any C-2 Dil~trict, no buildin
premises shall be used or arranged or designs
for one (1) or more of t]~e following uses:
(a) Any permi~ted uses in the C-2
(b) Antique ~hops, not to in(
indoor an,~ outdoor flea mark
and consignment stores.
(c) Appliance stores.
(d) Art schools, galleries or mu~
(e) Artist material and supply s~
97-132
about wanting to
nty as development
~he uses listed in
ses; that none of
Chesterfield; and
e Board to make a
ain businesses to
~hop on Midlothian
that businessmen
ted that the Board
~lications in the
ie not necessarily
~rom the Board of
se to operate the
~ of this ordinance
etion to keep the
~le and citizens a
[es in the County's
~rticular business
~r whose owner has
ears, has operated
~s paid taxes. She
s business will be
currently working
Mrs. Humphrey has
ts the use is non-
~ply with current
He further stated
rty, but thinks it
proposed ordinance
)ile sale business.
onforming, by this
ess file a zoning
'ating the business
will follow-up on
on and report back
are any problems,
~ade by Mr. Daniel,
~opt the following
HE COUNTY
Y AMENDING
1-173, 21.1-176
S OF AND
qD PROFESSIONS
)rs of Chesterfield
160, 173, 176 and
terfield, 1978, as
~s, structures or
d to be used except
District.
.lude pawnbrokers,
~ts and secondhand
eums.
~ores.
2/26/97
(f)
(g)
(h)
(i)
(J)
(k)
(1)
(m)
(n)
(o)
(P)
(q)
(r)
(s)
(t)
(u) .
(v)
(w)
(x)
(Y)
(z)
(aa)
(Db)
(cc)
(dd)
(es)
(ff)
(gg)
(hh)
(ii)
(JJ)
(kk)
(11).
(mm)
(nn)
(oo)
(pp)
(qq)
(rr)
(ss)
Automobile self-service stations.
Bicycle sales and rentals.
Catering establishments.
Churches and/or Sunday Schools.
Clothes stores.
Communication studios, offices and stations,
exclusive of towers.
Curio or gift shops.
Department stores.
Delicatessens.
Frozen food locker and sales.
Funeral homes or mortuaries.
Furniture stores.
Health clubs.
Hobby stores.
Jewelry stores:
~Libraries.
Locksmith operations.
Meat markets.
Medical facilities or clinics.
Messenger or telegraph services.
Motor vehicle accessory stores.
Musical instrument stores.
Office supply stores.
Optometrists sales and services.
Paint and wallpaper stores.
Pet shops, incIuding pet grooming.
Philanthropic and charitable uses.
Photography studios.
Post offices.
Radio, television and other home entertainment,
sales and services.
Rental of health and party equipment; and small
home hardware, tools and equipment.
Rest, convalescent homes and other group care
facilities.
Restaurants, to include carry-out restaurants,
but not fast-food restaurants.
Schools--music, dance and business.
Sewing machine sales, instruction, and services.
Sporting goods sales.
Telephone exchanges.
Toy stores.
Travel arranging and transportation ticket
services.
Veterinary clinics.
o o o
Sec. 21.1-159. Permitted uses--By riqht.
Within any C-3 District, no buildings, structures, or
premises shall be used or arranged or designed to be used except
for one or more of the following uses:
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)
(f)
(g)
(h)
(i)
(J)
(k)
(1)
(m)
(n)
(o)
(p)
Any permitted uses as regulated in the C-2
District.
Automobile service stations.
Carpenter and cabinetmakers offices and display
rooms.
Cocktail lounges and nightclubs.
Contractors' offices and display rooms.
Electrical, plumbing or heating supply sales,
service and related display rooms.
Feed, seed, and ice sales.
Fraternal uses.
Greenhouses or nurseries.
Hospitals.
Hotels.
Indoor flea markets.
Laboratories.
Liquor stores.
Motor vehicle washes.
Recreational establishments, commercial-indoor.
97-133
(q)
(r)
(s)
(t)
(u)
(v)
(w)
Repair services, excluding b~
and transmission repair of mot
Restaurants, to include fast-J
with 'or without an outsid~
system.
Schools--commercial, trade,
training.
Secondhand and consignment
motor vehicle consignment lot~
Taxidermies.
Theaters, except drive-in the~
Veterinary hospitals and/or c~
Sec. 21.1-160. Uses permitted with certain
The following uses shall be permitted
subject to compliance with the following col
applicable standards of this chapter.
restrictions cannot be met, these uses
conditional use, subject to the provisions
(a)
(b)
(c)
Unless permitted in the C-3 I
permitted with restrictions ir
Material reclamatio
centers--aluminum, glass an
only, provided that they are
structure and there is no ow
tractor trailers.
Motor vehicle sales and renta
vehicle consignment lots an(
sales and rental, service ar
that:
(i)
Ail such uses shall be
of one hundred (100)
residential and office
currently zoned agricul~
the general plan for res
use. This setback sha
according to section 21
(2)
Storage yards for vehi
repair/painting, aucti
sales, shall be screene(
adjacent properties on wi
not permitted or do nc
public roads or areas
agricultural and shown ¢
for residential or offi¢
(3)
Ail garage-type doors
away from, or screen~
adjacent residential or
external roads or area
agricultural and shown
for residential or offi
(4)
There shall be no
structures for motor ve~
0 0 0
Sec. 21.1-173. Permitted uses--BY riqht.
Within any C-5 District,l no buildings, stru
shall be used, arranged Or designed to be u~
(1) or more of the following uses:
(a) Any permitted uses in the C-[
(b) Any permitted uses in the I-i
(c) Auction sales or salvage bar]
(d) Boat sales, service, repair
97-134
)dy, major engine
:or vehicles.
food and carry-out
public address
vocational and
~tores, excluding
lters.
)mmercial kennels.
~strictions.
the C-3 District
~ditions and other
If the following
~y be allowed by
section 21.1-9:
istrict, any uses
~nthe C'2 District.. .
receiving
paper products
located within a
~_rnight parking of
1, excluding motor
as accessory to
· repair provided
~et back a minimum
eet from adjacent
roperties or areas
:ural and shown on
idential or office
11 be landscaped
1-228(a) (4) .
:les awaiting body
)n or wholesale
f from view of any
rich such yards are
t exist, external
currently zoned
n the general plan
e use.
shall be oriented
d from view of,
office properties,
s currently zoned
,n the general plan
:e use.
elevated display
~icles.
ctures or premises
;ed, except for one
District.
District.
~nd rental.
2/26/97
(e)
(f)
(g)
(h)
(i)
(J)
(k)
(1)
(m)
(n)
Building material sales yards, not
concrete mixing.
Commercial automobile parking.
Contractor's shops and storage yards.
Display houses or "shell'' houses.
Freight forwarding, packing, and
services.
Farm implements and machinery sales,
rental and repair establishments.
Manufactured home, mobile home,
travel trailer sales, service,
rental.
including
crating
service,
modular home,
repair and
Mater.iai reclamation receiving
centers--aluminum, glass and paper products
only.
Motels, motor courts or tourist homes.
Motor vehicle sales, service, repair, and
rental, excluding motor vehicle consignment
lots. '
o o o
Sec. 21.1-176. Conditional uses.
The following uses may be allowed by conditional use in the
C-5 District, subject to the provisions of section 21.1-9:
(a) Any conditional use allowed in the C-3 District,
unless previously permitted in the C-5 District.
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)
(f)
(g)
(n)
(i)
(J)
(k)
(1)
(m)
(n)
Adult bookstores.
Adult mini-motion picture theaters.
Adult motion picture theaters.
Bondsman.
Check cashing establishment.
Indoor flea market.
Massage parlors.
Motor vehicle consignment lots.
Occult Sciences (includes fortune tellers,
palmists, astrologists, numerologists,
clairvoyant, craniologist, phrenologist, card
readers, spiritual readers, tea leaf readers,
prophets and psychics).
Outdoor flea market.
Pawnbroker.
Travel trailer parks.
Subject to 'the requirements hereinbelow set
forth, other uses which are not specifically
enumerated in this chapter and which are of the
same general character as the specifically
enumerated uses allowed in this district. Before
consideration of an application to allow any use
by conditional use pursuant to this subsection,
the director of planning must find in writing
that the proposed use's operating
characteristics are substantially similar to,
and its impact on neighboring properties no
greater than, the operating characteristics and
impacts of the specifically enumerated uses
allowed in this district. Such finding shall be
based upon an analysis of the proposed use,
which includes, among other things,
consideration of the size and proposed
configuration of the site; the size, height and
exterior architectural appearance of any
proposed structure or structures; noise; light;
glare; odors; dust; outdoor activities; traffic;
parking; signage; and hours of operation.
o o o
2/26/97
97-135
Sec. 21.1-281. Definitions.
: 0 0 0
Bondsman: Any person or iestablishment other
indemnity or fidelity and security companl
business of entering intoi or offering to ent
others, for compensation, whether as princip
who shall be in compliance with the requireme:
Article III.
o o o
Check cashing establishments: Any person
engaged in the business of cashing ~checks
orders for compensation, and registered
Corporation Commission pursuant to Va. Code
o o o
Indoor flea market: An ongoing show at a sl
with a single promotor all of which is cz
building enclosed by wallS that consists of ~
more persons selling or offering for sale
merchandise such as hobby! crafts, antiques,
secondhand articles or any combination of the~
shows conducted by nonprofit organizations th
federal taxes by the Internal Revenue.Service
this definition.
o o o
Motor vehicle consignment lot: Any person or e
primary business is the selling of motor vet
for the owner of the vehicle, in return
compensation.
o o o
Occult Sciences: Any person or establishme]
occupation of a fortUne teller, palm~
numerologist, clairvoyant, craniologist, p
reader, spiritual reader, tea leaf reader, pl
advisor or who in any other manner claims o]
fortunes or claims or pretends to disclose m
individuals for any form of compensation.
o o o
Outdoor flea market: An ongoing show at a s.
with a single promotor any part of which is cc
a building enclosed by walls that consists of
more persons selling or offering for sale
merchandise such as hobby crafts, antiques,
secondhand articles or any combination of the
shows conducted by nonprofit organizations t~
federal taxes by the Internal Revenue Service
this definition.
ooo
Pawnbroker: Any person or establishment that
money or other things foriprofit on the pledg~
personal property or Other valuable th
securities or written or!printed evidence o
who deals in the purchasing of personal
valuable things on condition of selling the
seller at a stipulated p~ice.
than a guaranty,
who is in the
er into bonds for
al or surety, and
~ts of Chapter 15,
or establishment
drafts or money
with the State
6.1-433.
ngle location and
~nducted inside a
group of five or
goods, wares or
~rt works, new or
~. Yard sales and
at are exempt from
are excluded from
stablishment whose
~icles as an agent
for any form of
it engaged in the
st, astrologist,
hrenologist, card
:ophet, psychic or
pretends to tell
~ntal faculties of
.ngle location and
nducted outside of
a group of five or
goods, wares or
art works, new or
;e. Yard sales and
.at are exempt from
are excluded from
lends or advances
~ and possession of
.ngs, other than
indebtedness, or
~roperty or other
same back to the
(2) That this ordin~
upon adoption.
Vote: Unanimous
ooo
~nce shall become ef ective
97-136
immediately
2/26/97
15.C. TO CONSIDER AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE CODE OF THE COUNTY
OF CHESTERFIELD, 1978, AS AMENDED, BY AMENDED AND
REENACTING SECTION 8-12 RELATING TO FEES IMPOSED FOR
COLLECTING DELINQUENT TAXES
Mr. Micas stated that this date and time has been advertised for
a public hearing to consider an ordinance relating to fees
imposed for collecting delinquent taxes.
No one came forward to speak 'in favor of or against this
ordinance.
On motion of Mr. Daniel, seconded by Mr. McHale, the Board
adopted the following ordinance:
AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE CODE OF THE COUNTY
OF CHESTERFIELD, 1978, AS AMENDED, BY AMENDING
AND REENACTING SECTION 8-12.6 RELATING TO
FEES IMPOSED FOR COLLECTING DELINQUENT TAXES
BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield
County:
(1) That Section 8-12.6 of the Code of the County of
Chesterfield, 1978, as amended,.is amended and reenacted to read
as follows:
Sec. 8-12.6. Fee imposed for collecting delinquent taxes.
If any person fails to timely pay taxes due the county,
such delinquent taxpayer shall be subject to and liable for a
delinquent tax bill collection fee. The delinquent tax bill
collection fee shall consist of administrative costs, attorney's
fees, and collection agency fees.
Administrative costs shall be:
(1)
Twenty dollars ($20.00) for taxes
after the filing of a warrant
appropriate legal document but
judgment; and
collected
or other
prior to
(2)
Twenty-five dollars ($25.00) for taxes collected
after judgment.
Attorney's fees may be added only if such delinquency is
collected by action of'law or suit in equity. Collection agency
fees may be added if taxes are collected by a private collection
agent.
The entire delinquent tax bill.collection fee imposed by
this section shall not exceed twenty (20) percent of the
delinquent tax bill and shall be in addition to all applicable
penalties and interests.
(2) That this ordinance
immediately upon adoption.
shall become effective
Vote: Unanimous
15.D. TO CONSIDER AN AMENDMENT TO THE FY96-97 BUDGET TO
APPROPRIATE $718,000 IN ANTICIPATED VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT
OF TRANSPORTATION REIMBURSEMENTS FOR THE 1-95/WOODS EDGE
ROAD INTERCHANGE DESIGN PROJECT
Mr. Stith stated this date and time has been advertised for a
public hearing to consider an amendment tot he FY96-97 budget to
appropriated Virginia Department of Transportation
reimbursements for the 1-95/Woods Edge Road Interchange Design
Project.
97-137
2/26/97
No one came forward to speak in favor of or a
On motion of Mr. McHale, seconded by Mr.
appropriated an additional $718,000, in ant
Department of Transportation reimbursements,
Edge Road Interchange Design Project.
Vote: Unanimous
15.E.
TO CONSIDER AN AMENDMENT TO THE FY96-!
APPROPRIATE $3,000,000 ($1.6 MILLION
DEVELOPER CONTRIBUTIONS.AND $1.4 MILL~
ANTICIPATED VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TM
REIMBURSEMENTS) FOR THE WOOLRIDGE ROAD
Mr. stith stated that this date and time has b
a public hearing to consider an amendment to
to appropriate anticipated developer contribu
Department of Transportation reimbursements
Road Extension Project.
No one came forward to speak in favor of or a.
On motion of Mr. Barber, seconded by Mrs. H~
appropriated $1.6 million in antic~
contributions; appropriated $1.4'million in an
Department of Transportation (VDOT) reimburs,
the County Administrator to enter into VDO!
design/right-of-way/construction agreements,
County Attorney, for the Woolridge Road Extel
authorized staff to acquire the right-of-way,
necessary, for the Project.
Vote: Unanimous
16.
REQUESTS FOR MOBILE HOME AND REZONING
97SR0168
In Bermuda Magisterial District, STEPHEN A.
BRIDGET MILLER requested renewal of Mobile Ho
to park a mobile home in a,Residential (R-
density of this proposal is approximately 1.
The Comprehensive Plan designates the propel
community use. This property fronts the sc
Road, approximately 600 feet west of Jeffersor
is better known as 2651 Velda Road. Tax Map 8
(Sheets 23 and 32).
Mr. Jacobson presented a summary of Case 95
staff recommends approval of the request for
to standard conditions. He noted the mobile
an area designated by the Jefferson Davis
commercial use.
Mr. Stephen A. Miller, Jr. stated the
acceptable. There was no opposition present
On motion of Mr. McHale, seconded by Mrs. H1
approved Case 97SR0168 for seven (7) yeas
following conditions:
The applicant shall be the owner ant
mobile home.
No lot or parcel may be rented or le
mobile home site, nor shall any mobil
rental property. Only one (1) mob
permitted to be parked on an individu.
97-138
'ainst this issue.
laniel, the Board
.icipated Virginia
for the 1-95/Woods
;7 BUDGET TO
IN ANTICIPATED'
[ON IN
~SPORTATION
EXTENSION PROJECT
een advertised for
~he FY96-97 Budget
tions and Virginia
for the Woolridge
ainst this issue.
~phrey, the Board
pated developer
ticipated Virginia
~ments; authorized
?/County/Developer
acceptable to the
~sion Project; and
by condemnation if
?ERMITS
MILLER, JR. AND
me Permit 88SR0188
?) District. The
[1 units per acre.
'ty for commercial
uth line of Velda
~ Davis Highway and
2-13 (1) Parcel 40
SR0168 and stated
even years subject
home is located in
orridor Plan for
· ecommendation is
mphrey, the Board
s subject to the
occupant of the
~sed for use as a
home be used for
ile home shall be
lot or parcel.
2/26/97
The minimum lot size, yard setbacks, required front yard,
and other zoning requirements of the applicable zoning
district shall be complied with, except that no mobile
home shall be located closer than 20 feet to any existing
residence.
No additional permanent-type living space may be added
onto a mobile home. 'All mobile homes shall be skirted
but shall not be placed on a permanent foundation.
Where public (County) water and/or sewer are available,
they shall be used.
Upon being granted a Mobile Home Permit, the applicant
shall then obtain the necessary permits from the Office
of the Building Official. This shall be done prior to
the installation or relocation of the mobile home.
Any violation of the above conditions shall be grounds
for revocation of the Mobile Home Permit.
Vote: Unanimous
96SN0290
In Matoaca Magisterial District, HAROLD V. GROOME, JR. requested
amendment to Conditional Use Planned Development (Case 87S096)
to delete the 30% limitation on residential uses on this tract
only. Residential use of varying types and densities as
permitted through previous conditions of zoning for Woodlake is
planned. The density of such amendment will be controlled by
zoning conditions or Ordinance standards. The Comprehensive
Plan suggests the property is appropriate for mixed use corridor
use. This request lies in a Corporate Office (0-2) District on
5.4 acres fronting approximately 526 feet on the south line of
Village Square Parkway, approximately 876 feet west of Woodlake
Village Parkway. Tax Map 74-4 (1) Parcel 6 (Sheet 19).
Mr. Jacobson presented a summary of Case 96SN0290 and stated
that the applicant is requesting that this case be deferred to
the Board of Supervisors meeting of May 14, 1997.
Mr. Harold V. Groome, Jr. stated the recommendation for the May
14, 1997 deferral is acceptable. There was no opposition
present to the deferral·
Mrs. Humphrey recommended that the request be deferred for
thirty days.
No one came forward to speak in favor of or against the
deferral.
Mr. Jacobson stated that the deferral would push the request to
March 26, 1997 in which the Board would hold its budget public
hearings. He suggested that the Board defer the request to
April 23, 1997 because of the Budget process and to allow for
ample advertisement time.
Mr. Groome concurred with deferring the request to April 23,
1997.
Mrs. Humphrey concurred with deferring the request to April 23,
1997. She suggested that the applicant meet with the other
property owners in the area who are also dealing with
transportation issues.
Mr. Groome stated that he has met with the businesses and County
staff in an attempt to address the transportation issues.
2/26/97
97-139
On motion of Mrs. Humphrey~ seconded by Mr.
approved deferred Case 96SN0290 until April
Vote: Unanimous
97SN0116
In Matoaca Magisterial District, RICHARD D. C!
rezoning from Community Business (C-3) to Ge
5). Motor vehicle and boat sales, service, r~
planned. However, with the approval of this
uses would be permitted. The density of such
controlled by zoning conditions or Ordinanc
Comprehensive Plan suggests the property i
commercial/industrial corridor use. This rt
acres known as 16021 Jefferson Davis Highwa]
(1) Parcel 71 (Sheet 41).
Mr. Jacobson presented a summary of Case 97SN(
Planning Commission and staff recommends appr(
of one proffered condition. He noted the r
the Southern and Western Area Plan.
Mr. Richard D. Cuneo, Sr. stated the
acceptable. There was no opposition present
On motion of Mrs. Humphrey, seconded by Mr.
approved Case 97SN0116 and accepted the fl
condition:
Prior to any site plan approval, sixty
of way on the east side of Route 1/301~
centerline of that part of Route
adjacent to the Property, shall be d,
unrestricted, to and for the benefi
County.
Vote: Unanimous
97SN0153
In Dale Magisterial District, PRIMECO PERSO5
L. P. requested Conditional Use Planned Devel
120 foot communications tower in a Resident
The density of such amendment will be co
conditions or Ordinance standards. The
suggests the property is appropriate for resi
to 4.0 units per acre. This request lies o
known as 9569 Alfaree Road. Tax Map 81-13
Section 3, Block E, Part of Lot 10 (Sheet 2
Mr. Jacobson presented a summary of Case 97S}
Planning Commission and staff recommends ap
conditions. He noted the request conforms
Western Area Plan.
Brennon Keen, Esquire, representing the app
recommendation is acceptable. There was no
On motion of Mr. Daniel, seconded by Mr.
approved Case 97SN0153, subject to the foll
1. There shall be no signs permitted to
(p)
In conjunction with site plan
owner/developer shall submit document~
FAA approval is required for the ere¢
If FAA approval is required, prior
building permit, a copy of FAA ~
submitted to the Planning Department.
97-140
McHale, the Board
~3, 1997.
'NEO, SR. requested
neral Business (C-
Ipair and rental is
request other C-5
amendment will be
e standards. The
s appropriate for
~quest lies on 0.9
,. Tax Map 149-15
)116 and stated the
)val and acceptance
~quest conforms to
recommendation is
McHale, the Board
)llowing proffered
(60) feet of right
measured from the
./301, immediately
~dicated, free and
t of Chesterfield
AL COMMUNICATIONS,
.opment to permit a
al (R-7) District.
:trolled by zoning
~omprehensive Plan
~ential use of 1.51
n 0.08 acre parcel
(3) Kendale Acres,
).
)153 and stated the
~roval, subject to
0 the Southern and
licant, stated the
~pposition present.
Barber, the Board
,wing conditions:
identify this use.
submission, the
Ltion as to whether
tion of the tower.
to release of a
Lpproval shall be
(P)
2/26/97
The tower and equipment shall be designed and installed
so as not to interfere with the Chesterfield County
Public Safety Trunked System. At the time of site plan
review, the owner/developer shall submit information as
deemed necessary by the' Chesterfield County
Communications and Electronics staff to determine if an
engineering study should be performed to analyze the
possibility of radio frequency interference with the
County system, based upon tower location and height, and
upon the frequencies and effective radiated power
generated by tower mounted equipment. Prior to release
of a building permit the study, if required, shall be
submitted to, and approved by, the Chesterfield County
Communications and Electronics'staff. (GS)
The developer shall be responsible for correcting any
frequency problems which affect the Chesterfield County
Public Safety Trunked System caused by this use. Such
corrections shall be made immediately upon notification
by the Chesterfield County Communications and Electronics
staff. (GS)
The color and lighting system for the tower shall be as
follows:
bo*
The tower shall be gray or another neutral
color, acceptable to the Planning Department.
The tower shall not be lighted. (P)
Ail driveways and parking areas shall be graveled or
paved and maintained to minimize dust problems and
provide ease of ingress and egress. (P)
Any building or mechanical equipment shall comply with
Section 21.1-248 of the Zoning Ordinance relative to
architectural treatment of building exteriors and
screening of mechanical equipment. (p)
(NOTE: This condition would require the screening of
mechanical equipment located on the building or ground
from adjacent properties and public rights of way.
Screening would not be required for the tower or tower-
mounted equipment.)
At such time that the tower ceases to be used for
communications purposes for a period exceeding twelve
(12) consecutive months, the owner/developer shall
dismantle and remove the tower and all associated
equipment from the property. (p)
In conjunction with the approval of this request, a
seventy (70) foot exception to the fifty (50) foot height
limitation for communications towers in Residential (R-7)
Districts shall be granted. (P)
Vote: Unanimous
978N0159
In Clover Hill Magisterial District, MT. GILEAD BAPTIST CHURCH
requested Conditional Use to permit a child day care facility in
an Agricultural (A) District. The density of such amendment
will be controlled by zoning conditions or Ordinance standards.
The Comprehensive Plan suggests the property is appropriate for
mixed use corridor use. This request lies on 0.7 acres known as
7900 Walmsley Boulevard. Tax Map 39-12 (1) Parcel 50 (Sheets 14
and 15).
2/26/97
97-141
Mr. Jacobson presented a summary of Case 97SN0
Planning Commission and staff 'recommends ape
conditions and acceptance of proffered conditJ
request conforms to the Route 360 Corridor P~
Ms. Shirley Scarborough, representing the app
recommendation is acceptable. There was no c
On motion of Mr. Warren, seconded by Mrs. H'
approved Case 97SN0159, subject to the follo~
The child day care use shall be c
conjunction with church use on the pre
Any new development for child day care
to the requirements of the Route 36,
Guidelines for the Corridor Focus Zone
And, further, the Board accepted the fo
conditions:
At such time as the public water system
to within 200 feet of the site, the own
extend a water line to the site and col
structures to the public water syste]
water line extension shall be designe
and pressure for fire protection p~
appropriate by the Fire Department.
deemed necessary, fire hydrants sha
locations to be approved by the Fire D
At such time as the public wastewate
extended to within 200 feet of
owner/developer shall extend a waste~
site and connect all existing struct~
wastewater system.
The maximum enrollment 'for any day
property shall be thirty-five (35).
limitation may be increased by t
Department provided: 1) left and/ol
are constructed along Walmsley Bouleva
if warranted, based on Transport
standards. The developer shall b~
dedication of all right of way rE
improvements; and 2) access to Wall
limited to one (1) entrance/exit. Th.
access shall be approved by t~
Department.
Vote: Unanimous
97SN0162
In Matoaca Magisterial District, 360 C~
requested rezoning from Agricultural (A) to
(C-4) of 2.5 acres with Conditional Use to
Townhouse (R-TH) and Residential Multi-Famil~
proffered conditions of 219.3 acres curreni
Business (C-4). The density
159 and stated the
roval, subject to
ons. He noted the
.an·
Licant, stated the
)position present.
.mphrey, the Board
Ting conditions:
onducted only in
)erty. (CPC)
use shall conform
Corridor Design
(p)
lowing proffered
has been extended
~r/developer shall
~nect all existing
n. The necessary
d to provide flow
[rposes as deemed
In addition, if
L1 be provided at
epartment.
u system has been
the site, the
~ater line to the
res to the public
care use on the
The enrollment
~e Transportation
right turn lanes
rd at each access,
~ation Department
responsible for
~quired for these
~sley Boulevard is
location of this
Transportation
PITAL PARTNERSHIP
Regional Business
~ermit Residential
(R-MF) uses, plus
ly zoned Regional
~mendment will be
of such ~
controlled by zoning conditions or'Ordinan(:e standards. The
Comprehensive Plan suggests the property is a~propriate for open
space, light commercial and office uses and $~r residential use
of 7.1 units per acre or more. This request ~ies on 221.8 acres
fronting in three (3) places for a total of ~pproximately 3,000
feet on the south line of Hull Street Roag~ also fronting in
three (3) places for a total of.approximately! 2,500 feet on the
east line of Route 288, and fronting approximately 1,200 feet on
the west line of Bridgewood Road. Tax Map (
18, 20 and 21; Tax Map 62-4 (1) Parcels 1 a
(1) Parcels 3, 10 and 20; Tax Map 62-8 (1) Pa
62-11 (1) Parcel 2 (Sheet 20).
97-142
.2-3 (1) Parcels 6,
nd 2; Tax Map 62-7
rcel 9; and Tax Map
2/26/97
Mr. Jacobson presented a summary of Case 97SN0162 and stated the
Planning Commission and staff recommends approval and acceptance
of proffered conditions. He noted the request conforms to the
Powhite/Route 288 Development Area land Use and Transportation
Plan.
Mr. Jim Theobold, representing the applicant, stated the
recommendation is acceptable. There was no opposition present.
On motion of Mrs. Humphrey, seconded by Mr. Barber, the Board
approved Case 97SN0162 and. accepted the following proffered
conditions:
PROFFERED CONDITIONS 1 THROUGH 15 ARE APPLICABLE TO THE 2.4 ACRE
PARCEL TO BE REZONED TO.C-4 (TAX MAP 62-8 (1) PARCEL 9):
Buffer. A one hundred (100) foot buffer shall be
maintained on the Property adjacent to Glen Tara
Subdivision. A six (6) foot high chain link security
fence shall be installed within such buffer upon
commencement of development. The exact location of the
fence shall be determined at the time of site plan
review, The aforesaid buffer shall conform to the
requirements of the Zoning Ordinance, Sections 21.1-226,
21.1-227 except (i) and (j), and 21.1-228.
Access Restriction. No access shall be provided to the
Property from Blockader Lane.
Public Utilities. The public water and waste water
systems shall be used.
Timberinq Restriction. With the exception of timbering
to remove dead or diseased trees which has been approved
by the Virginia State Department of Forestry, there shall
be no timbering until a land disturbance permit has been
obtained from the Environmental Engineering Department°
Transition of Uses. Uses shall be limited to:
ae
de
Rest, nursing, and convalescent homes.
Residential multi-family and townhouses.
Offices: business, governmental, medical or
professional.
Office/warehouses.
Heiqht Limitation. No office building shall exceed two
(2) stories or thirty (30) feet in height, whichever is
less, if located within three hundred (300) feet of Glen
Tara Subdivision.
ArchitectUral Standards--- Non-Residential Buildings.
Ail non-residential buildings to be constructed on the
Proper{y shall be compatible in architectural style,
materials, colors, details and other design features.
Architectural Standards--Multi-family/Townhouses. The
architectural appearance of any multi-family or townhouse
units constructed on the Property shall be similar in
appearance to the Cross Creek, Woodlake Village or
Hunters Chase apartment developments. A minimum of
forty percent (40%) in the aggregate, of the visible
portions of the exterior wall surfaces of such multi-
family/townhouse buildings (chimneys, front, rear and
sides), excluding windows, doors, breezeways and
architectural design features, shall be of brick
construction.
2/26/97
97-143
Minimum Square Footage-Townhouses. Any townhouses
developed on the Property shall have a minimum of one
thousand one hundred (1,100) square feet of gross floor
area for a two (2) bedroom townhouse and a minimum of one
thousand two hundred (1,200) square feet of gross floor
area for a three (3) bedroom townhouse.
10.
Recreational Area Restrictions. No outdoor recreational
facilities shall be constructed within three hundred
(300) feet of Glen Tara subdivision. No outdoor
basketball courts shall be permitted within any multi-
family or townhouse development.
11.
Outdoor Speakers. No outdoor speaker system shall be
installed within any multi-family or townhouse
development on the Property.
12.
Heiqht Limitation-Multi Family. No multi-family
buildings constructed on the Property shall exceed three
(3) stories or forty-five (45) feet in height, whichever
is less, as measured and viewed from the highest finished
grade adjacent to the buildings.
13.
Parkinq Lot Liqhtinq. Parking lot lighting in any multi-
family or townhouse development shall be produced from
concealed sources of light. Parking lot lighting
standards in any multi-family or townhouse development
shall not exceed twenty (20) feet in height and shall be
positioned in such a manner as to minimize the impact of
such lighting off the Property.
14.
Drainaqe. No drainage resulting from the construction of
impervious areas or buildings shall enter Glen Tara
subdivision.
15.
Notification of Site Plan. The Community Manager of the
Brandermill Community Association shall be mailed notices
by the owner/developer of all site plan submissions to
Chesterfield County. Prior to site plan approval, the
owner/developer shall provide the Planning Department
with evidence of such mailing.
THE FOLLOWING PROFFERED CONDITIONS ARE APPLICABLE TO ALL
PROPERTY THAT IS THE SUBJECT OF THIS REQUEST:
16.
Density. No more than four hundred fifty (450)
residential units shall be constructed on the Property
and the property which was the subject of Case No.
95SN0197.
(NOTE: This conditions supersedes Proffered Condition 9
of Case 95SN0197.)
17.
Equivalent Densities. The maximum density of this
development when coupled with that associated with Case
No. 95SN0197 shall be 674,000 square feet of shopping
center, 5,000 square feet of fast food restaurant with
drive-thru window, 200 room hotel and 450 apartment units
or equivalent density as approved by the Transportation
Department.
(NOTE: This condition'supersedes Proffered Condition 18
of Case 95SN0197.)
(NOTE: Ail other conditions of zoning approval for Case
95SN0197 remain in effect.)
Vote: Unanimous
97-144
2/26/97
978N0164
In Matoaca Magisterial District, VIRGINIA ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY
AND PRIMECO PERSONAL COMMUNICATIONS, L. P. requested Conditional
Use Planned. Development to permit a 185 foot communications
tower in a Residential (R-7) District. The density of such
amendment will .be controlled by zoning conditions or Ordinance
standards. The Comprehensive Plan suggests the property is
appropriate for general industrial use. This request lies on
0.6 acres fronting approximately 24 feet on the north line of
Landfill Drive, approximately 720 feet west of Iron Bridge Road.
Tax Map 114-1 (1) Part of Parcel 8 (Sheet 31).
Mr. Jacobson presented a summary of Case 97SN0164 and stated the
Planning Commission and staff recommends approval, subject to
conditions. He noted the request conforms to the Powhite/Route
288 Development Area land Use and Transportation Plan.
Mr. Keen, representing th·applicant, stated the recommendation
is acceptable. He noted that this is an existing Virginia Power
facility compound and that there is fence around the entire
compound, which is ample fence to satisfy Condition #1. There
was no opposition present.
On motion of Mrs. Humphrey, seconded by Mr. Barber, the Board
approved Case 97SN0164, .subject to the following conditions:
The base of the tower shall be enclosed by a minimum six
(6) foot high fence, designed to preclude trespassing.
A detailed plan depicting this requirement shall be
submitted to the Planning Department for approval in
conjunction with final site plan review. (P)
In conjunction with site plan submission, the
owner/developer shall submit documentation as to whether
FAA approval is required for the erection of the tower.
If FAA approval is required, prior to release of a
building permit, a copy of FAA approval shall be
submitted to the Planning Department. (P)
The tower and equipment shall be designed and installed
so as not to interfere with the Chesterfield County
Public Safety Trunked System. At the time of site plan
review, the owner/developer shall submit information as
deemed necessary by the Chesterfield County
Communications and Electronics staff to determine if an
engineering study should be performed to analyze the
possibility of radio frequency interference with the
County system, based upon tower location and height, and
upon the frequencies and effective radiated power
generated by tower mounted equipment. Prior to release
of a building permit, the study, if required, shall be
submitted to, and approved by, the Chesterfield County
Communications and Electronics staff. (GS)
The developer shall be responsible for correcting any
frequency problems which affect the Chesterfield County
Public Safety Trunked System caused by this use. Such
corrections shall be made immediately upon notification
by the Chesterfield County Communications and Electronics
staff. (GS)
The color and lighting system for the tower shall be as
follows:
The tower shall be grey or another neutral
color, acceptable to the Planning Department.
97-145
2/26/97
If lighted, lighting during daylight hours shall
be limited to medium intensity strobe lights
with upward reflection and lighting during night
time hours shall be limited to soft blinking
lights. (p)
Ail driveways and parking areas shall be graveled or
paved and maintained to minimize dust problems and
provide ease of ingress and egress. (P)
Any building or mechanical equipment shall comply with
Section 21.1-248 of the ~Zoning Ordinance relative to
architectural treatment of building exteriors and
screening of mechanical equipment. (P)
(NOTE: This condition would require the screening of
mechanical equipment located on the building or ground
from adjacent properties and public rights of way.
Screening would not be required for the tower or tower-
mounted equipment.)
At such time that the tower ceases to be used for
communications purposes for a period exceeding twelve
(12) consecutive months, the owner/developer shall
dismantle and remove the tower and all associated
equipment from the property. (P)
In conjunction with the approval of this request, a 135
foot exception to the fifty (50) foot height limitation
for communications towers in Residential (R-7) Districts
shall be granted. (P)
Mr. Warren commended the Planning Commission and s~ff for their
e~rt~ 'on zoning requests and working out issues before it
reac~'"~ Board of Supervisors·
16. ADJOUrnmENT
On motion of Mrs. Humphrey, seconded by Mr. Barber, the Board
adjourned at 8:20 p.m. until March 12, 1997 at 2:00 p.m.
Vote: Unanimous
Afthur S. Warren
Chairman
97-146
2/26/97