08-24-1994 Packet
Matoaca Supervisor Selection
For the official record of our Board,
Whaley Mason Colbert, Chairman of the
Chesterfield County Board of
Supervisors and Matoaca District
Supervisor, died on Wednesday, August
17,1994.
Under the provIsions of our County
Charter, the remaining members of the
Board have 60 days to select a
qualified replacement to fulfill the
remainder of Mr. Colbert's term.
Selection is by majority vote of the
remaining members of the Board. If the
Board is unable to agree on a
replacement within 60 days, the
Judges of the Circuit Court will appoint
a replacement.
The Board of Supervisors will begin
formal consideration of candidates to
fulfill the remainder of Mr. Colbert's
term at our next regular meeting,
Wednesday, September 14. The Board
has until Sunday, October 1 6, to reach
agreement on a replacement before
action by the Circuit Court.
-
To be eligible for the office of Matoaca
District Supervisor an individual must
be a qualified voter and must reside in
the Matoaca District at the time of
selection b t Board. r
Persons who meet these requirements
and desire to serve should submit a
letter to the Clerk to the Board of
Supervisors by the close of business on
Tn ay, September 8.
The letter should be accompanied by a
resume outlining the individual's
qualifications for the office. The letter
and resume may be accompanied by
any other supporting documentation the
individual feels may assist the Board in
its deliberations. Letters, resumes and
any other supporting material submitted
by candidates for the office may
become public records.
If the Board is unable to agree on a
replacement from among those who
apply, it may solicit candidates for the
seat fronl among qualified citizens of
Matoaca District.
-
It is my personal goal to work with this
Board to select as Matoaca Supervisor
an individual who is highly qualified to
represent all the citizens of Matoaca
District. I feel that this person should
be known to the citizens of Matoaca
and be able to vigorously represent
their interests on this Board and with
the County Administration. At the
same time, this person should be a
consensus builder on matters that come
before the Board and in work with our
regional partners.
Are there any questions or comments
from members of the Board?
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Page .J:... of..!-
Meeting Date:
August 24, 1994
Item Number:
2.A.
Subject:
County Administrator Comments
County Administrator's Comments:
:-.
countyAdminlstrator:'Jpf'~ F ~
BoardAction Requested:
Summary of Information : '
Representatives of the Metro Richmond Chamber of Commerce will present the Board of
Supervisors with the print entitled "Richmond on the James" which was commissioned by
the Chamber and depicts Richmond yesterday and today as well as historic areas in
Chesterfield, Henrico and Hanover.
Preparer:~~
Marilyn E. Cole
S.C~
Ex@outi'/8 ./\ssistant
Attachments:
. Yes
D No
I #
001
I
-
-
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
August 24, 1994 AGENDA
Page .J:... of~
Meeting Date:
Item Number:
8.B.7.d.
Subject:
Set Public Hearing to Amend the Zoning Ordinance Relative to Salaries
for Planning Commissioners and Members of the Board of Zoning Appeals
County Administrator's Comments:
~ ~ C^- rrtL ~ a J'- ~ (~/rf"f'
countyAdministrator:W~~ ~ L~
tJ
BoardAction Requested:
Planning Commission requests that Board of Supervisors set September 14,
1994, for a public hearing to amend the Zoning Ordinance relative to
salary increases for Planning Commissioners and members of the Board of
Zoning Appeals.
Summary of Information:
This ordinance will uniformly change Planning Commission and Board of
Zoning Appeals members salaries by the same percentage as adopted by the
Board of Supervisors for County employees.
Currently, salaries for the members of the Planning Commission and Board
of Zoning Appeals are set by separate Board action. The current salary
of the Board of Zoning Appeals is $3,000, with their last increase in
1988. The Planning Commission salary is $8,000, with their last
increase in 1993. Adoption of this ordinance will result in a 3% salary
increase for FY 1994-95.
Also, the ordinance will repeal Article V of Chapter 2 of the Code,
which defines the powers, duties, compensation, etc. of the Planning
Commission and relocate it in the zoning ordinance.
Preparer: ~ { E::-
Title:
Director of Planning
1AUe2494!A.Aem~DA4/qok
I # 090
Attachments:
. Yes
D No
~
-
~~~.:r~?"
.~._1i~"~
'tr~~
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Page -L oli
Summary of Information: (Continued)
Bud2:et and Mana2:ement Comments:
The additional cost associated with these salary increases is approximately
$1,700 per year. The Planning Department will try to absorb this expense
within their FY95 budget, with any necessary adjustment being made at the
end of the fiscal year. A 3% increase will bring the Planning Commission
salaries to $8,240 per year, and the Board of Zoning Appeals members will
be paid $3,090.
f\. il ".L .. 7't....
("","'~ ..C /, i.... .'-'._ ~~. - /'" .-.1
< I~";,/ I ( '/' / 'J /. U "f":h 1 /l-lf.L-'l o.
, r
'James [.L. Stegmaier, Director
./
1# 091
---
--
appointed by the board of supenisors, all ofy;hom shall be residents of the county, qualified
by lcnowbdgc and cJi.'Perienc:; to mal::e decisions on questions or commt:nitJ' g:::-owth ane.
de~,'clopment; pro\ided, that at leust one b.al: of :he members so o.ppoin::d shall be
f:::-eoholders. The board of supervisors may require eacb membe:- of the com..'TIis:ion to to.b;
an oath of office.
(b) One (1) member of the COIE.m:lSSlOn m::)' "je 0. member of :1:1e beard of
:upornsors, md one U) membor m:l)' be 0. me:::nber of tb.e o.dminist:ati\'~ brunch of
government of the county. The term. of each of these two (2) members shall be cocx:ensh'c
'.'lith the :crm of office to which he hus boen elcc:;:;d or appointed, unless :::;:; board ::r
supenisors, at the firs: :-egular moeting each year, appoints others to se:'"':;:; as their
representati'18s. The remainin; members of tho commission :hall serlO for ter:ns of :our (1)
years e:lch. The board of supenisors may establish different tc:-ms of office :cr initial aad
subs;:;quent J.ppointments. \'acancies shall be fillod by appointme::lt for the ur:2;~?ir;:;d ter::l
only. :.'fembers may be remo'1ed for malfeasance in office.
(c) The board of supenisors iliay pro<,idc for:
(1) R.:limbursement of acma! oxpenses inc1.:r:::-;:;d by :nembers of the
comrmSSlOn; or
(2) Compensation to sucb membe:-s, or any of tbc:::n, for the:::-
ser,'Ices; or
(3) Both.
(3) That Section 2.30, of the Code of the County of Chesterfield, 1978, as amended,
is repealed.
Sec. 2-30. Pm'lcrs and duties generally.Revealed.
The county pl~)min; cornmission shall have all the functions, pov.'ers
and duties prescribed :or local plunning :ommissions J)' s'tute 1m,>.
(4) That Division 3 of Article I of Chapter 21.1 of the Code of the Coumv of
Chesterfield, 1978, as amended, is added to read as follows:
Article 1. In General
Division 1. Purpose and Interpretation
Sec. 21.1-1. Purpose of chapter:.
1000:6694.1
-2-
093
-
Sec. 21.1-2. Interpretation and application of chapter.
Sec. 21.1-3. Nonconforming uses.
Division 2. Conformity and Enforcemem
Sec. 21.1-4. Conformity with chapter required.
Sec. 21.1-5. Enforcement.
Sec. 21.1-5.1. Civil penalties for certain violations.
Sec. 21.1-6. Proceedings to prevent construction of building in violation of chapter.
Division 3. Planning Commission.
(5) That Section 21.1-6.1 of the Code of the Countv of Chesterfield, 1978, as
amended, is added to read as follows:
Sec. 21.1-6.1. Qualifications. appointment. removaL terms. comoensation. etc..
of members.
( a) The countv planning comrmSSlOn. hereinafter sometimes referred to as the
commission. shall consist of not less than five (5) nor more than fifteen (15) members.
apoointed bv the board of suoervisors. all of whom shall be residents of the count\'. aualified
bv knowledge and exDerience to make decisions on questions of communitv !ITowth and
develoDment: provided. that at least one-half of the members so aDDointed shall be
freeholders. The board of suoervisors may require each member of the commission to take
an oath of office.
(b) One (1) member of the comrmSSlOn may be a member of the board of
suoervisors. and one (1) member may be a member of the administrative branch of
government of the countv. The term of each of these two (2) members shall be coextensive
with the term of office to which he has been elected or aDooimed. unless the board of
supervisors, at the first rerular meeting each Year, appoints others to serve as their
representatives. The remaining members of the commission shall serve for terms of four (4)
years each. The board of suoervisors mav establish different terms of office for initial and
subsequent aDpointments. Vacancies shall be filled bv aDo ointment for the unexoired term
only. Members mav be removed for malfeasance in office.
(c) (1) Uniform comoensation shall be provided to olanning commission members
for their services and such comDensation shall be increased each fiscal year bv the
percentage authorized bv the board of supervisors for employees at the oroficient level.
1000:6694.1
....
-.)-
094
-
(2) The board of sUDernsors rnav Drovide for reimbursement of actual eXDenses
incurred bv members of the commission.
(6) That Section 21.1-6.2 of the Code of the Counrv ot" Chesterfield, 1978, as
amended, is added to read as follows:
Sec. 21.1-6.2. Powers and duties Q:enerallv.
The countv DlanninQ: commission shall have all the funr-tions. Dowers
and duties Drescribed for local DlanninQ: commissions bv state law.
.'
(7) That Section 21.1-13 of the Code of the Counrv of Chesterfield. 1978, as
amended, is amended and reenacted to read as follows:
Sec. 21.1-13. Board of zoninQ" anneals.
000
(b) Organization: Employees, Removal of Members; Compensation: The board of zoning
appeals shall elect one (1) of its members as chairman to serve for a one (1) year term. Tne
chairman shall preside at all meetings of the board and in his absence, a member designated
by the board of zoning appeals as vice-chairman shall preside. The vice-chairman shall serve
for a term of one (1) year. Such officers may succeed themselves. The board of zoning
appeals shall appoint a secretary whose duty it shall be to keep the minutes and other
records of the actions and deliberations of the board of zoning appeals and perform such
other ministerial duties as the board of zoning appeals shall direct. The secretary shall be
a salaried county employee and shall perform the duties of secretary of the board of zoning
appeals in addition to his other regular duties. Within the limits of funds appropriated by
the board of supervisors, the board of zoning appeals may employ or contract for secretaries,
clerks, legal counsel, consultants, and other technical and clerical services. Members of the
board of zoning appeals shall receive uniform comDensation for their services and such
compensation shall be increased each fiscal vear bv the percentaQ"e authorized bv the board
of sunervisors for ernnlovees at the proficient level mn)' ;:"cc~ive s'J.ch compcr:s:.::on o..s :::ny
be authorized by tho boarc: of super1isors. Any board of zoning appeals member may be
removed for malfeasance, misfeasance or nonfeasance in office or for other just cause, by
the court which appointed him, after hearing held after at least fifteen (15) days' notice.
000
(8) That this ordinance shall become effective immediately upon adoption.
~.
1000:6694.1
-:1_
095
~.
-
-
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Page ~of~
Meeting Date:
August 24, 1994
Item Number:
11.
Subject:
EXECUTIVE SESSION
County Administrator's Comments:
CountyAdmlnlstrator: 'JHuf'~ ~ ~ ~
BoardAction Requested:
Summary of Information:
Executive Session, pursuant to ~ 2.1-344.A.7., Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended, for
consultation with legal counsel regarding legal issues arising out of the renewal of the cable
television franchise.
Preparer:
Title:
County Attorney
0603:7240.2
1#
:14~7
Attachments:
. Yes
D No
-
-
MOTION:
DATE:
SECOND:
RE:
CERTIFICATION OF EXECUTIVE SESSION
HELD IN CONFORMANCE WITH LAW
WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors has this day adjourned
into Executive Session in accQrdance with a formal vote of the
Board, and in adcordance with the provisions of the Virginia
Freedom of Information Act; and
WHEREAS, the Virginia Freedom of Information Act effective
cluly 1, 1989, provides for certification that such Executive
Session was conducted in conformity with law.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of County
Supervisors does hereby certify that to the best of each
member's knowledge, i) only public business matters lawfully
exempted from open meeting requirements under the Freedom of
Information Act were discussed in the Executive Session to
which this certification. applies, and ii) only such public
business matters as were identified in the Motion by which the
Executive Session was convened were heard, discussed or
considered by the Board. No member dissents from this certifi-
cation.
Vote:
(by roll call)
The Board being polled, the vote was as follows:
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT DURING VOTE:
ABSENT DURING MEETING:
**CERTIFIED**
CLERK TO THE BOARD
1.48
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Page -L of...L
Meeting Date:
August 24, 1994
Item Number:
8.B.6.
Subject: Amendment to Minutes of June 22, 1994
County Administrator's Comments:
~ /l-~
CountyAdrnlnistrator: ~~. k ~
V
BoardAction Requested:
Amendment to minutes of June 22, 1994.
Summary of Information:
At the Board meeting on June 22, 1994, the Board held a public hearing
to consider granting Chesterfield Cablevision, Incorporated a renewal
of its cable television franchise and to adopt amendments to Chapter 7
of the Code of the County of Chesterfield, 1978, as amended, relating
to providing cable television services in the County. Presentations
were made by Mr. Mike Chernau, Assistant County Attorney, and Mr. Buck
Dopp, General Manager of Comcast.
In transcribing the minutes, staff inadvertently referred to comments
expressed by Mr. Chernau as those of Mr. Dopp, therefore, staff
requests the Board amend the minutes as follows:
Preparer:
0~ 7r7. y:;~
Teresa M. Pitts
Title:Clerk to the Board of
Supervisors
I #
075
Attachments:
DYes
. No
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Page 2.. ol2..
Summary of Information: (Continued)
FROM:
"Mr. Mike Chernau, Assistant County Attorney, stated this date
and time has been advertised for a public hearing to consider
granting Chesterfield Cablevision, Incorporated a renewal of its
cable television franchise and to adopt amendments to Chapter 7
of the County Code related to providing cable television services
in the County. He further stated staff has negotiated an
agreement with Comcast which will provide the County with the
most powerful cable system in the Richmond metropolitan area and
greater broadcast potential than any system in the region and
briefly reviewed the agreement. He then introduced Mr. Charles
"Buck" Dopp, General Manager of Comcast.
Mr. Dopp stated in exchange for a 15-year renewal with
Comcast, Comcast will upgrade its system to 750 mhz or 100
channel capacity within three years; provide expanded
governmental, educational, and public access channels; provide a
Public Safety Channel and equip the new Public Safety Training
Center with the capability of broadcasting training material over
the subscriber network to remote locations; construct a return
line from Manchester High School and provide equipment to allow
production and broadcasting of educational programs over the
subscriber network; connect the new James River High School and
Fire station Number 15 with basic service at no cost; and
purchase a teleprompter for its studio on Ironbridge Road. He
further stated Comcast has also agreed to provisions in the
amended ordinance which will strengthen guarantees of high
customer service standards; make line extensions easier and
quicker than under current requirements; and will require Comcast
to submit to performance reporting requirements and public
evaluations every two years. He stated if the County commits to
purchase the requisite terminal equipment and pay the rates
calculated, Comcast will commit to provide Institutional Network
(INET) services. He further stated Comcast's goal is to provide
a broad array of services that will allow customers to choose and
requested the Board to accept Comcast's franchise proposal."
TO:
"Mr. Mike Chernau, Assistant County Attorney, stated this date
and time has been advertised for a public hearing to consider
granting Chesterfield Cablevision, Incorporated a renewal of its
cable television franchise and to adopt amendments to Chapter 7
1#
076
,"
-
--
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Page ~ 01:2...
Summary of Information: (Continued)
of the County Code related to providing cable television services
in the County. He further stated staff has negotiated an
agreement with Comcast which will provide the County with the
most powerful cable system in the Richmond metropolitan area and
greater broadcast potential than any system in the region and
briefly reviewed the agreement including Comcast providing
equipment to allow production and broadcasting of educational
programs over the subscriber network and purchasing a
teleprompter for its studio on Ironbridge Road. He then
introduced Mr. Charles "Buck" Dopp, General Manager of Comcast.
Mr. Dopp stated in exchange for a 15-year renewal with Comcast,
Comcast will upgrade its system to 750 mhz or 100 channel
capacity within three years; provide expanded governmental,
educational, and public access channels; provide a Public Safety
Channel and equip the new Public Safety Training Center with the
capability of broadcasting training material over the subscriber
network to remote locations; construct a return line from
Manchester High School; and connect the new James River High
School and Fire station Number 15 with basic service at no cost.
He further stated Comcast has also agreed to provisions in the
amended ordinance which will strengthen guarantees of high
customer service standards; make line extensions easier and
quicker than under current requirements; and will require Comcast
to submit to performance reporting requirements and public
evaluations every two years. He stated if the County commits to
purchase the requisite terminal equipment and pay the rates
calculated, Comcast will commit to provide Institutional Network
(INET) services. He further stated Comcast's goal is to provide
a broad array of services that will allow customers to choose and
requested the Board to accept Comcast's franchise proposal."
1#
077
I
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Page .2:-of~
Meeting Date: August 24, 1994
Item Number:
2.B.
Subject: County Administrator Comments
1994 National Association of Counties Awards
County Administrator's Comments:
countyAdminmtrator:~c/~ f/4
BoardAction Requested:
Summary of Information :
At the recent meeting of the National Association of Counties in Clark
County, Nevada, Chesterfield County received 20 NACo Achievement
Awards and 1 Excellence Award from the National Association of County
Information Officers (NACIO).
These awards represent high level of services and programs on the part
of our employees in Chesterfield County and demonstrate our commitment
to our mission of "Providing a first choice community through
excellence in public service."
It is a pleasure to present these awards to the following departments
(see attached) :
Preparer:
Title: Executive Assistant
Attachments:
. Yes
D No
I #
002
I
1994 NACo ACHIEVEMENT AWARD APPLICATIONS
DEPARTMENT
PROJECT
Budget and Management (2)
Jay Stegmaier
Economic Development, Strategies for
Success
Total Quality Improvement - Strategic
Quality Plan
County Administration (3)
Lane Ramsey
Historic Regional Summits *
Central Virginia Coalition *
Regional InterCity Visit Follow-up
Presentation *
Emergency Communications
Tom Hanson
Standing Operation Procedures (Personnel
Manual)
Extension Service
Suzan Craik
Chesterfield to the Chesapeake
Fire Department
Robert Eanes
Emergency Medical Services Infection
Control Program
Human Resource Management (2)
Kevin Bruny
Mary Martin Tucker
1993 Supervisory Leadership Institute:
Leadership for Continuous Improvement
An Equal Opportunity Employer...By Choice
Internal Audit
Lou Lassiter
Charitable Gaming (Bingo/Raffle) Seminar
Central Library (2)
Dr. Robert Wagenknecht
In the Bag Program
Book Talk Program
Mental Health/Mental Retardation (2)
Burt Lowe
Consumer Run Helpline
Immediate Services Team (1ST) Project
Planning Department (2)
Debra Burrell
Tom Jacobson
Annual Report
County-wide Zoning Conversion
Social Services
Jean Smith
Virginia Incentives to Advanced Learning
Office on Youth (2)
Barbara Bennett
Youth Needs Symposium
The "Solutions" Program*
*Regional Cooperation Initiatives
003
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
Department of
NEWS AND INFORMATION SERVICES
KENNETH N. PERROTfE
Director
(804) 748-1161
Fax (804) 748-3952
July 25, 1994
P. o. Box 40
Chesterfield, VA 23832
or
Room 500
County Administration Building
FOR JMl\tffiDIATE RELEASE
COUNTY PROGRAMS WIN 20 ACHIEVElYffiNT AWARDS
Of the 27 entries from Chesterfield County in the 1994 National Association of Counties
Achievement Awards program, 20 were selected to receive awards. The program, now in its
22nd year, recognizes programs developed by county governments in response to particular
concems or problems.
The awards will be presented at the annual NACo conference, July 31 - August 4 in Clark
County, Nev.
County departments that received awards are:
Budget and lVlanagement, for enacting the "Total Quality Improvement" (TQI) program
that is expected to increase productivity, reduce costs and enhance employee morale, and for a
report, Economic Development in Chesterfield County: Strategies for Success, which includes
recommendations in the areas of strengthening the workforce, growth and development, and
residents' needs.
County Adminstration, received three awards for its involvement in Historic Regional
Summits that were held to focus on important issues such as economic development and water
strategies, for its presentation following the first regional intercity visit, and for its involvement
in the Central Virginia Coalition.
Emergency Communications, for its personnel manual, Standing Operation Procedures,
which outlines the mles and regulations that govem the communications center.
-more-
004
Providing a .!Pirst Choice community through excellence in public service.
-
1994 NACo Awards
July 25, 1994
Page 2
Extension Services, for its "Chesterfield to the Chesapeake" program. An educational
retreat was held to increase awareness among youth about management and conservation
measures to preserve and protect our water quality.
Fire Department, for enacting its "Emergency Medical Services Infection Control"
program for the protection of citizens and employees. This program is in response to the
increased awareness of infectious diseases that has been heightened by the epidemic of such
vimses as AIDS and Hepatitis.
Human Resource Management, for development of "An Equal Opportunity
Employer.. .By Choice" program, which takes an assertive approach to cultural diversity in the
workforce, and for its 1993 Supervisory Leadership Institute: Leadership for Continuous
Improvement. Created as part of TQI, this program assists front-line supervisors with identifying
and developing leadership skills that are essential in a continuous improvement environment.
Internal Audit, for the formation of its Charitable Gaming (Bingo/Raffle) Seminar that
educates volunteer citizens about complying with the complex State of Virginia charitable gaming
laws.
Central Library, for its "In the Bag" program, where bags of books are delivered to day
care centers and Head Start groups for use with preschool children, and for its "Book Talk"
program. Through discussion of chosen books, young adults are encouraged to continue reading
for pleasure.
Mental Health/Mental Retardation, for creation of its Consumer Run Helpline that
assists consumers with developing personal support networks to achieve community integration,
and for its Immediate Services Team (IST) project that focuses on providing immediate support to
all county residents who request mental health services.
Planning Department, for its county-wide zoning project that converted the zoning and
changed the development standards on 4,000 parcels of land in an urbanizing locality, and for its
1993 Annual Report.
Social Services, for developing the "Virginia Incentives to Advanced Leaming" program,
which is a joint effort of the Social Services Department and Falling Creek Middle School. This
tmancy and dropout prevention program addresses barriers to school success and highlights
parental involvement. It targets low income and disadvantaged families.
Office on Youth for its annual Youth Needs Symposium, which orchestrates the
parcipitation of all citizens in identifying needed services for youth and families, and for its
"Solutions" program, a violence prevention program developed by youth for youth.
-1110re-
005
.-
1994 NACo Awards
July 25, 1994
Page 3
Chesterfield County Administrator Lane B. Ramsey had this to say about the NACo
awards program:
"We're proud of all the departments that submitted entries in the National Association of
Counties program and won achievement awards. The awards are being presented to a wiele range
of departments across a diversity of programs and products and really represent a lot of hard
work and talent by our county work force. The awards speak to the reputation for quality and
leadership Chesterfield County enjoys in the public sector and we're honored by the recognition. -
In a sense, it shows that the real winners are the citizens of Chesterfield County."
* * * * * * * *
006
-
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Page ....L of...1...
Meeting Date: A.ugust 24, 1994
Item Number:
2.C.
Subject:
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS
County Administrator's Comments:
countyAdmini_or:~a/~ )=~
BoardAction Requested:
Summary ofInformation:
Mr. Bradford S. Hammer, Deputy County Administrator for
Management Services, will present an update on the LaPrade and
EttrickjMatoaca Branch Libraries.
Preparer:
tJ Ai.? 'tt' 0(. II / '.Iffl J-;
Theresa M. Pitts
Title: Clerk to Board of Supervisors
Attachments:
DYes
. No
I # 007
-
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Page L of...!....
Meeting Date: August 24, 1994
Item Number:
5.
Subject:
RECOGNITION OF WRIC TV 8, LESLIE PALOTTA, MORNING AND NOON
ANCHOR, JOHNSTON-WILLIS HOSPITAL, AND WILLIAM D. JACOBSEN,
ASSOCIATE ADMINISTRATOR FOR THEIR SUPPORT TO THE CHESTERFIELD
EMERGENCY PLANNING COMMITTEE
County Administrator's Comments:
~~
County Administrator: ~~ ~ f-v~
~t/
BoardAction Requested:
The staff requests that the Board adopt a resolution recognlzlng WRIC
TV 8, Leslie Palotta, Morning and Noon Anchor, Johnston-Willis Hospital,
and William D. Jacobsen, Associate Administrator.
Summary of Information:
WRIC-TV 8 and Leslie Pallotta have produced and aired four, thirty-second
public service announcements for the citizens of Chesterfield County.
Johnston-Willis Hospital has donated the funding and William D. Jacobsen
has donated many hours of his time to produce the public service
announcements. Mr. William D. Jacobsen, Associate Administrator for
Johnston-Willis Hospital, has served on the Chesterfield Emergency
Planning Committee for over two years and as a Public Information
Subcommittee Chairman for over one year.
preparer:~)-~~ \~
Robert L. Eanes 8-15-94
Title:
FirA ~hiAf
Attachments:
. Yes
D No
I #
008
-
RESOLUTION RECOGNIZING WRIC TV, LESLIE PALLOTTA
JOHNSTON-WILLIS HOSPITAL, AND WILLIAM 0 JACOBSEN
FOR THEIR SUPPORT TO THE
CHESTERFIELD EMERGENCY PLANNING COMMITTEE
WHEREAS, WRIC TV 8, Leslie Pallotta, Johnston-Willis
Hospital, and William D. Jacobsen have developed, produced
and aired public service announcements to assist with
emergency preparedness for Chesterfield County citizens; and
WHEREAS, WRIC TV 8-ABC-Nationwide Communications,
Incorporated located at Arboretum Place in Chesterfield
County, Virginia, is a leading television network in
Chesterfield County and the state of Virginia; and
WHEREAS, WRIC TV 8 has produced and aired four, thirty-second
public service announcements to educate the citizens of
Chesterfield County on emergency preparedness; and
WHEREAS, Leslie Pallotta, Morning and Noon News Anchor, has
donated many hours of her time to produce the public service
announcements for the Chesterfield Emergency Planning
Committee; and
WHEREAS, Johnston-Willis Hospital, located at 1401 Johnston-
Willis Drive in Chesterfield County, Virginia, is a community
leader in the field of community education in Chesterfield
County and one of the leading hospitals in Virginia; and
WHEREAS, Johnston-Willis Hospital has donated the funding to
produce four, thirty-second public service announcements to
educate the citizens of Chesterfield County on emergency
preparedness; and
WHEREAS, William D. Jacobsen, Associate Administrator, has
donated many hours of time to produce the public service
announcements, and has worked with the Chesterfield Emergency
Planning Committee for over two years and as a Public
Information Subcommittee Chairman for over one year; and
WHEREAS, the public service announcements cover critical
topics such as the difference between a tornado watch and a
tornado warning, advising citizens to find out where their
local emergency shelter is located, what to do if there is a
chemical leak in the area, and reminding citizens to check
their smoke detector batteries; and
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Chesterfield County
Board of Supervisors on behalf of its members, recognizes
WRIC TV 8, Leslie Pallotta, Johnson-Willis Hospital, and
William D. Jacobsen and expresses its appreciation for their
valuable assistance and donations to the Chesterfield
Emergency Planning Committee and to the citizens of
Chesterfield County.
009
AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that a copy of this resolution
be presented to WRIC TV 8, Leslie Pallotta, Johnston-Willis
Hospital, and William D. Jacobsen and this resolution be
permanently recorded among the papers of this Board of
Supervisors of Chesterfield County, Virginia.
010
,..<t--
--
-
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
August 24, 1994 AGENDA
Page ~of.2-
Meeting Date:
Item Number:
G.
Subject:
Work Session Relative to the sign Ordinance and Set Public Hearing to
Amend Zoning Ordinance Relative to Signs
County Administrator's Comments:
~ ~ ~ {~{Yf<( Ck> ~ ~M.
CountyAdministrator: 11t#1R~ r L#-
BoardAction Requested:
Staff recommends the Board of Supervisors hold a work session on August
24, 1994, and set September 14, 1994, for a Public Hearing to amend the
Zoning Ordinance relative to signs.
Summary of Information:
In September, 1992, the Planning Commission initiated a comprehensive
evaluation of the County's sign standards by appointment of a Committee
comprised of business and residential leaders, sign company officials,
and two Planning Commissioners.
The Sign committee met 15 times over an 18 month period and, early in
the process, identified that existing standards were inequitable,
confusing and too diverse. The committee prepared a purpose statement
and goals to guide the preparation of the new ordinance and sought input
from the Retail Merchants Association of Greater Richmond, auto dealers,
movie theater operators and others. The committee also recognized a
need for a commitment from the County to enforce the sign ordinance once
it is adopted and developed alternatives to portable signs to allow
businesses to advertise special events in an effort to reduce the
constant enforcement activity associated with temporary portable signs.
After three public hearings and numerous work sessions, the Planning
~::~~~~~ I~r~~mmended approval of the attached zoning ordinance
p ~ _A Title: Director of Planning
reparer: 'I'hol'l\a~ E. J =-- 3MJa2.4~.4/A.}.CEtIDA.4,'ge]t
1# u
. Yes
D No
011
I
Attachments:
-.
-
,~f.
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Page ~ o~
Summary of Information: (Continued)
At the Planning Commission's last public hearing the following changes
were requested by business interests, however, the items listed below
were not recommended by the Committee or the Planning Commission:
permit off-site directional signs advertising
residential property for sale (these signs have
been permitted in the past and are prohibited in
the recommended ordinance);
permit electronic message center signs similar to
the ones at Southern Electronic and Richmond Honda.
The Commission recommends these signs be banned.
Operators request these signs be allowed with a 4
second message change interval. The sign committee
recommended a 15 minute interval.
Please see the following attachments for other summarized information
and the proposed ordinance:
A. Purpose and Goals of Sign Committee
B. Sign Committee Members
C. Summary of proposed Sign Ordinance changes
D. Draft Sign Ordinance
1#
012
PROPOSED REQUIREMENTS TODAY'S REQUIREMENTS
- Two different standards. - Three different standards.
- Sign standards regulated by use of property. - Sign standards regulated by zoning of property.
- Total sign area permitted for a site is calculated - Total sign area permitted for a site is calculated
same Countywide. Based on building frontage differently depending upon location, i.e., area
only. is based on building frontage if in a shopping
center, lot frontage if not.
- The permitted aggregate sign area applies to - The permitted aggregate sign area includes
building mounted signs only. The guaranteed freestanding sign area in addition to all
freestanding sign area is not deducted from this building mounted sign area.
amount.
- Requires submittal of a sign package which - Sign package required. No limitation on
describes colors and letter styles Countywide. colors or letter styles.
- If applicant disagrees with Director of - Appeal is filed with Board of Zoning Appeals.
Planning's decision regarding a sign package,
an appeal may be filed to the Planning
Commission.
- Improved description of method for calculating - Different formulas for sign area calculation.
sign area. Dependent upon type of project and zoning
classification.
- Sign area for movie theaters increased to a - Limited to 100 square feet.
maximum of 200 square feet.
- Sign area for hotels on interstate highways - Li m i ted to 1 00 sq uare feet.
increased to 150 square feet.
- Provides for temporary use of banners, yard - Prohibited.
sale signs and open house signs.
- Exemption from sign permit process for - Where sign is allowed, permit required for any
banners and certain real estate signs. signs in excess of eight (8) square feet.
- Greater diversity in style of freestanding sign. - Must be monument style.
A particular style is not required.
- Requirements are more uniform Countywide - Different standards based on location and
and more simply written to ease use and zoning classification.
understandi ng.
- Any new tenant in a building which has larger - All signs must be brought into conformance
non-conforming sign existing advertising other with Ordinance requirements.
tenants may install sign for its space in 013
accordance with the proposed Ordinance.
SUMMA~ OF PROPOSED SIGN ORDINANC ~HANGES
......
-
ATTACHMENT A
-
-
PROPOSED BONUS PROVISIONS
... Freestanding sign area may be increased by 25% if an interchangeable copy sign is
included.
... Buildings which border either roads accessible by the public or parking areas on both
the front and rear sides, may have sign area increased by 100%.
... Bonus of 75% additional building mounted sign area within freestanding projects
when freestanding signs are not used.
... Buildings on corner lots may have sign area increased by 50%.
... Increased minimum guaranteed sign area for building mounted signs to thirty (30)
square feet when individually mounted or painted letters are used.
NOTE: Bonus areas are calculated based on maximum permitted sign area for a
building before any increase through a bonus is added.
~ .;
,"
014
-
-
PURPOSE:
To prepare an Ordinance for the regulation of signs which permits desirable identification, promotes
com patibility of signs with their surroundings and minimizes unnecessary sign proliferation.
Specifically, the committee shall evaluate the diverse standards that exist today, identify problems
and inconsistences with these standards and recommend simpler, more consistent standards in
keeping with the spirit and intent of other zoning standards.
GOALS:
. To simplify and unify sign requirements Countywide to the greatest extend possible while
recognizing the need for special sign requirements for the County's unique village areas.
. To facilitate effective communication between the public and businesses through signs that
are appropriate for the type of road on which they are located.
. To encourage a viable economic environment through the location and design of adequate
businesses signs.
. To protect pedestrians and motorists from distractions or hazards caused by the
indiscriminate placement or use of signs.
. To maintain properly values by eliminating signs that are incompatible with surrounding
land uses.
. To encourage quality sign design to promote a better visual environment.
ATTACHMENT B
01.5
Mr. phil Cunningham
Mr. Harry Marsh
Mr. Ed Face
Mr. Paul Grasewicz
Mr. Alexander Sadler
Mr. Bobby Simmons
Ms. Lois Marsha
Ms. Terri Pruitt
Ms. Joanne Cash
Mr. Tommy Williams
Mr. Russell Miller
Mr. Bill Rapp
ATTACHMENT C
""..
..........
SIGN ORDINANCE COMMITTEE MEMBERS:
Chairman
Vice-Chairman
Bermuda District Representative
Clover Hill District Representative
Dale District Representative
Matoaca District Representative
Midlothian District Representative
Home Builders Association of Richmond
Richmond Board of Realtors
Sign Company Representative
Large Business Representative
Small Business Representative
016
-
-
(1) That Sections 21.1-265 through 21.1-270.1 of the Code of the County ofChestetjield,
1978, as amended, are hereby repealed.
(2) That Sections 21.1-270.2 through 21.1-270.15 o/the Code of the County ofChestetjield,
1978, as amended, are added to read as follows:
Division I. - Generallv
Sec. 21.1-270.2. Puq;>ose and Intent.
(a) The purpose and intent of this article is to regulate the use of publicly visible displays
or graphics; to protect and enhance the character of roadways and surrounding areas; to prevent
diminishing property values due to excessive signage; to safeguard the public use and nature of
roadways; and to minimize visual distractions to motorists along public roads.
(b) The regulations are specifically designed to:
(1) Promote maximum legibility of signs and to prevent their over-concentration as well
as excessive height, bulk and area.
(2) Promote the safety of persons and property by requiring that signs not create a
hazard due to collapse, fire, collision, decay, or abandonment; do not obstruct fire
fighting or police surveillance; and do not create traffic hazards by confusing or
distracting motorists or by impairing the driver's ability to see pedestrians, obstacles
or other vehicles, or to read traffic signs.
(3) Enable customers and other persons to identify and locate a business or service.
Sec. 21.1-270.3. General Reeulations.
The following regulations apply to all signs and are in addition to the regulations contained
elsewhere in this chapter.
1-."
(a) Applicable state and federal sign requirements shall be complied with.
"
(b) Sign Permits Required and Permit Process
(1) A county sign permit shall be required for all signs over eight (8) square feet in area
unless otherwise provided in this article.
(2) No sign for which a permit is required shall be erected without a permit.
(3) Application for permits shall be submitted on forms obtained at the Office of the
1000:4553.8
(Clean version of 4553.7)
- 1 - ~
017
ATTACHMENTD
--
Building Official. A permit will not be granted for a sign unless the applicant meets
the requirements of this article. Each application shall be accompanied by scaled
drawings based on a survey plat, showing the location of the sign and property
identification by tax map and parcel number. Such applications shall include plans
showing the size, dimension and height of the sign. In the case of projecting sign
structures, complete specifications and methods of anchoring and support shall be
required. Each freestanding sign structure which requires a sign permit shall have
the permit number and date of issuance permanently affixed to the sign by the
owner in a location clearly legible from the ground. If deemed necessary by the
Director of Planning, upon erection of any sign (building mounted or freestanding),
a survey plat certifying the location, height or area of the sign shall be submitted
to the Planning Department verifying compliance with these requirements.
(4) Filing Fee
A non-refundable Planning Department filing and administrative fee shall
accompany all sign permit applications.
(c) Prohibited Signs
(1) Signs Creating Obstructions Prohibited.
a. Sign structures shall not obstruct any window, door, fire escape, stairway,
ladder or opening intended to provide light, air or ingress and egress for any
building or structure.
b. Signs shall not be erected so that sight lines from public rights of way to other
signs are obstructed. Information regarding adjacent existing signs shall
accompany sign permit applications as requested by the Director of Planning.
(2) Unsafe and Dangerous Signs Prohibited.
a. Whenever a sign or outdoor advertising structure becomes structurally
unsafe through damage, deterioration, infestation, improper maintenance or
any other reason and endangers the safety of a building or premises or
endangers the public safety, the Chief Building Official shall order that the
sign be made safe or removed,in accordance with the requirements of the
Virginia Uniform Statewide Building Code and Article I of Chapter 6 of
this Code.
b. No sign shall be erected, used, operated or maintained in such a manner
that, by reason of the position, shape or color, it may interfere with,
obstruct the view of or be confused with any authorized traffic sign, signal
or device.
1000:4553.8
(Clean version of 4553.7)
- 2 -
018
.-
c. No sign shall be constructed, erected, used, operated or maintained which
displays lights resembling or seeming to resemble lights customarily
associated with danger or such as are customarily used by police, fire, or
emergency vehicles.
d. Sign lighting shall be positioned and shielded so as not to impair the vision
of any motor vehicle operator or obstruct firefighting or police surveillance
or cause any direct glare into or upon any property other than the property
to which the sign may be accessory.
(3) Other Prohibited Signs.
In addition to any other signs which are prohibited by this article, the following
signs are prohibited:
a. Portable signs.
b. Any sign placed on utility poles or stop signs except for approved banners
erected on approved supports. Signs may be attached to trees only on sites
which are experiencing land disturbing activities.
c. Any moving or sound-producing sign intended to attract attention regardless of
whether or not the sign has a written message or whether all or any part of the
sign moves by any means, including, by rotating, fluttering or being set in
motion by movement of the atmosphere. This includes, but is not limited to,
hot or cold air balloons, inflatables, pennants, streamers, tinsel, propellers or
discs. This paragraph does not apply to the hands of a clock operating as such.
However, within Village Districts, the Director of Planning may approve such
signs for a period not to exceed two (2) days for special community events if
notified in advance in writing.
d. Flashing signs.
e. Any sign displayed on a stationary vehicle when said vehicle is used primarily
for the purpose of and serving the function of a mobile or portable sign,
including, but not limited to, the parking of a vehicle for a period of more than
twenty-four (24) hours except when such vehicle is parked in the driveway of
the residence of the operator or when the vehicle is parked to the side or rear
of a commercial building and is not visible from adjacent public roads or is
loading or unloading.
f. No freestanding sign shall be constructed so that any portion of the sign or its
supports shall overhang any portion of a building.
1000:4553.8
(Clean version of 4553.7)
- 3 -
019
-
g. Changeable signs - computer controlled variable message electronic signs.
(d) Signs not Requiring Permits.
(1) The following signs may be erected without a sign permit but shall be in
accordance with the structural and safety requirements of the Uniform Statewide
Building Code:
a. Official traffic signs, warning signs, SIgns maintained by law or
governmental order, rule or regulation.
b. Any sign or portion of a sign used to identify a street address provided that
no numeral or letter is used as the name of the business.
c. Any sign inside a building or other enclosure which is intended for viewing
by patrons within the building or enclosure and which is not visible from
the exterior of the building or enclosure.
d. Non-illuminated signs, not more than three (3) square feet in area,
prohibiting trespassers, hunting, fishing, solicitors or parking or announcing
adoption of highways for litter control, posted property, crime watch areas
or the towing of unauthorized vehicles.
e. Works of art or the architectural features or characteristics of a building
that do not include or imply a commercial message. These include wall
murals or paintings, decorative flags, crosses, or flames, provided that they
do not exceed a height of forty (40) feet.
f. Traffic control signs on private property. These signs include but are not
limited to stop, one-way, do not enter and restricted parking signs.
g. Handicapped parking and access signs.
h. Flags, emblems and insignia of any nation, political unit, government,
campaign, or an educational, charitable, religious or similar group,
provided that no flag pole shall exceed forty (40) feet in height. In
addition, one flag which identifies a business, public or private organization
may be permitted when displayed in a grouping with any governmental flag,
provided no flag pole shall exceed forty (40) feet in height.
1. Under-canopy signs within shopping centers. Each store shall be permitted
one (l) sign not to exceed eight (8) square feet in area in front of its main
entrance located under and attached to the roof canopy and mounted
perpendicular to the store front. This sign shall not require a sign permit
1000:4553.8 - 4 -
(Clean version of 4553.7)
020
-
and shall not be deducted from the sign area permitted for the store.
J. Decorative flags at private residences and in shopping centers and office
parks, provided that they do not exceed a height of forty (40) feet or an
area of fifty (50) square feet:
1. Where a shopping center or office park uses a common logo for
identification, multiple decorative flags may be displayed in the
development. However, flags advertising individual tenant names
and/or logos or conveying a commercial message shall not be
permitted.
11. Decorative flags displaying seasons, holidays or special occasions may
be displayed.
111. Each flag must be individually attached to a pole, mast-arm or other
device.
k. Yard sale signs not more than four (4) square feet in area. Such signs shall be
limited to a maximum of one (1) off premises and one (1) on premises. Signs
must be removed within forty-eight (48) hours after the event.
1. Temporary real estate signs advertising the sale or rent of the residential
premIses.
1. Temporary on-site real estate signs advertising the sale or rent of the
premises shall not be illuminated, shall be maintained in good condition and
shall be removed within ten (10) days after the transfer of title or rental of
such property.
11. Temporary off-site and on-site real estate signs may be placed on private
property directing the way to premises which are for sale or rent that are
open to the public for inspection. Such signs shall be erected only while
the building is open to the public for inspection and shall be removed when
the agent or owner closes the building for public viewing. Each real estate
agent or owner shall be limited to one (1) sign per street intersection and
one (1) sign per premises being rented or sold. The message shall be
restricted to "open house" , a directional arrow, and the real estate company
or owner's name, logo, phone number and the hours the building is open
for inspection.
111. Any permitted temporary real estate sign shall not exceed six (6) square feet
In area.
1000:4553.8
(Clean version of 4553.7)
- 5 -
021
-
m. Directional signs advertising special community events provided that they do not
exceed four (4) square feet in area, there is not more than one (1) per street
intersection and they are removed within forty-eight (48) hours after the event
takes place. Before these signs may be installed, the Director of Planning must
be notified in writing of their location, message and length of display.
(2) The following signs shall be permitted in public rights of way subject to approval by the
Virginia Department of Transportation.
(a) Public signs posted by or on behalf of a government body.
(b) Signs which direct or regulate pedestrian or vehicular traffic.
(c) Bus stop signs posted by a public transit company or a government.
(d) Information signs of a public utility regarding its poles, lines, pipes or facilities.
(e) Directional signs indicating the location of churches, schools, hospitals, parks,
scenic areas, historic areas, train stations or airports.
(3) Banners:
(a) Banners do not require a sign permit. Before a banner can be used, the applicant
must notify the Director of Planning in writing, of the size, area, proposed location
and manner of fastening of the banner and receive approval thereof. Any banner
installed without prior notification to and approval of the Director of Planning shall
be removed immediately upon notification by the Planning Department and no other
banner shall be displayed on site for ninety (90) days.
(b) A single banner not to exceed fifty (50) square feet in area may be used to advertise
a new business which has not installed its permanent signs provided the banner is
not used for more than thirty (30) days.
(c) A single banner not to exceed fifty (50) square feet in area may be temporarily used
to advertise special events provided the banner is not used for more than fourteen
(14) days.
(d) The area of these banners may be increased in accordance with the following:
1. One (1) square foot for each two (2) feet of store frontage in excess of 100 feet
provided that no banner shall exceed 150 square feet in area.
11. One (1) square foot for each fifty (50) feet the store is setback from the nearest
1000:4553.8
(Clean version of 4553.7)
- 6 -
022
-
public road provided that no banner shall exceed 150 square feet in area.
111. No more than 250 square feet within village areas when used to advertise
community events and displayed across public roads.
(e) The time periods in paragraphs (b) and (c) shall be counted consecutively and a
banner shall not be erected more than four (4) times a year on the same property.
(4) Any displays which contain political, campaign, religious, educational or charitable
messages or which advertise events for non-profit organizations, provided that, such
displays shall not exceed eight (8) square feet in area, shall not exceed a height of five
(5) feet and, if applicable, shall be removed within thirty (30) days of the event they
advertise.
Sec. 21.1-270.4. Non Conformine and IIlee:al Siens.
(a) If any condition imposed or accepted as part of any land use decision by the Board of
Supervisors is more restrictive than a requirement specified in this article the condition
shall control.
(b) Any sign not lawfully existing prior to (insert effective date) and which could not have
been erected in accordance with the provisions of the ordinance then in effect, shall not
become a legal sign by the enactment of this article and shall be removed.
(c) Any sign lawfully existing prior to (insert effective date) but which could not be erected
in accordance with the requirements of this section, shall be deemed to be a non-
conforming sign and may continue subject to the following conditions:
(1) The sign must be properly maintained.
(2) The sign must be in a safe condition.
(3) If a non-conforming sign is enlarged, changed or altered structurally, the sign must
comply with all of the requirements of this article except as provided in paragraph
(d) below.
(4) No non-conforming sign shall be repaired or refurbished at a cost in excess of
thirty-five (35) percent of the replacement cost of the total sign structure, unless it
is brought into conformance with the requirements of this article. Normal
maintenance and copy change of outdoor advertising signs shall not be deemed to
be repair or refurbishing costs.
(5) Nonconforming signs and their structures which are either destroyed or damaged to
1000:4553.8
(Clean version of 4553.7)
- 7 -
023
--
the extent of fifty (50) percent or more of their appraised value shall not be rebuilt
or repaired except in conformance with this article.
(d) Any non-conforming sign may have a new face substituted for its old face without
effecting its non-conforming status. Further, any new tenant in a multi-tenant building
may erect new building mounted signs in conformance with this article without affecting
the non-conforming status of other signs on the building. Any tenant wishing to modify
existing signs, except to reface the signs, shall bring the modified signs into
conformance with this article.
(e) Any business which has closed shall be required to remove any on- or off-premises signs
associated with the business within twelve months of the end of the calendar year during
which the business closed.
Sec. 21.1-270.5. Outdoor Advertisine Si2ns.
(a) Outdoor advertising signs shall be prohibited unless otherwise permitted within this
article.
(b) All nonconforming outdoor advertising signs existing on and after July 22, 1992, may
remain in place after becoming nonconforming, provided that they are maintained in accordance
with this article, and provided further that after an outdoor advertising sign has been
nonconforming for seven (7) years, it shall be removed.
Sec. 21.1-270.6. Sien Desien and Setbacks Requirements.
(a) With the exception of signs permitted to be placed in the right of way as per section
21.1-270.3(d)(2), all signs, including directional signs, shall be set back at least fifteen (15) feet
from all property lines, unless a greater setback is specified, or unless otherwise specified in this
article. However, along public rights of way, this setback may be reduced to a minimum of
twenty (20) feet from the edge of pavement or face of curb, but in no case shall the sign be set
back less than one (1) foot from the property line provided the owner of such sign shall relocate
the sign to conform to the requirements herein at such time that the adjacent road is widened.
Within the Village District, the sign setback shall be five (5) feet from the right of way line.
Along roads which have proposed right of way expansion as delineated in the Comprehensive
Plan and such right of way has not been acquired, signs may be located within the proposed
right of way provided the owner shall relocate the sign in accordance with the requirements
stated herein once the rights of way are acquired.
(b) Sign Package Required: A comprehensive sign package for all signs within a proposed
development shall be submitted to the Planning Department for approval. The sign package
shall provide detailed renderings to include colors, sizes, lighting, and location for all signs
within any development.
1000:4553.8
(Clean version of 4553.7)
- 8 -
024
-
-.
(1) A unified system of signage and graphics shall be provided within an individual
development. The letter style, graphic display, and color of all signs and graphics
within a shopping center, office, business, commercial or industrial park shall be
similar. Area, location, material, and color shall be compatible with buildings and
site design.
(2) The developer shall determine that either sign cans, canopy or awning signs or
individually mounted letters shall be used within the development.
(3) The developer shall select three (3) colors to be used by tenants and out-parcels.
Where sign cans are used, the background colors shall be similar.
(4) Notification of these determinations shall be submitted in writing to the Planning
Department for approval.
(5) Sign packages for developments shall be submitted in conjunction with the first site
plan submitted for approval within the project. In the event the applicant disagrees
with the decision of the Director of Planning regarding the sign package, the
applicant may file an appeal to the Planning Commission in accordance with the
process as specified in section 21.1-275(d).
(c) Changeable Copy Signs.
(1) Changeable copy cannot be incorporated into a sign face unless the changeable
component of the sign face occupies less than half the total area of that sign face
except for movie theater signs.
(2) If changeable copy is used, it shall be located adjacent to or integrated into the sign
face.
(3) Lettering of changeable copy shall be of a single, simple, easily legible lettering
style and shall be of uniform color and size throughout the changeable copy portion
of the sign.
(d) Grass, live groundcover, shrubs and trees consistent with other site plantings, shall be
provided around each individual permanent freestanding sign. The landscaping required
by this section shall be depicted on site or landscaping plans.
(e) Illumination.
(1) External lighting shall be limited to light fixtures using white, not colored, lighting
and shall not be blinking, fluctuating, or moving. External lighting shall be
provided by concealed and/or screened spots or floods and shall be arranged and
1000:4553.8
(Clean version of 4553.7)
- 9 -
025
-
-
installed so that direct or reflected illumination does not exceed 0.5 footcandles
above background measured at the lot line of any adjoining residential, townhouse
residential, multi-family residential, or agricultural district or public right of way.
(2) Internal lighting shall be limited to internal light contained within translucent letters
and/or logos and internally illuminated sign boxes, provided the background or field
on which the copy and/or logos are placed, is opaque. The area illuminated is
restricted to the sign face only. The direct or reflected illumination shall not exceed
0.5 footcandles above background measured at the lot line of any adjoining
residential, townhouse residential, multi-family residential or agricultural parcel or
public right of way. Changeable copy boards may have a translucent signfield.
Sec. 21.1-270.7. Limitation on Specific Si2ns.
(a) Window signs: Signs attached to doors or windows which are legible from outside the
building shall not exceed an area greater than twenty-five (25) percent of the total window or
door area of anyone face of the building.
(b) Directional Signs: Directional signs such as enter, exit, employee parking, or shipping
and receiving shall be limited to no more than two (2) per public road entrance which shall be
legible from the adjacent public road. Business logos may be permitted on directional signs
provided the logo(s) does not occupy more than 25 % of the directional sign face. Business
names will not be permitted. These signs where provided shall accurately indicate actual traffic
patterns.
(c) On-site Directory Signs: On-site directory signs shall be limited to no more than one
(1) per vehicular entrance into the project. On-site directory signs shall either be screened by
landscaping or located so that they are not legible outside a project. These signs shall not be
included in calculating the number of freestanding signs permitted or in calculating the total
aggregate sign area.
(d) One (1) detached order board is permitted for each stacking lane for businesses with
drive-through facilities. These signs shall not be included in calculating the number of
freestanding signs permitted or in calculating the total aggregate sign area.
(e) Scoreboards and other signs advertising goods, services or products shall be permitted
within ball diamonds, ball fields, racetracks, stadiums, arenas or other facilities accommodating
sporting events or activities. Where such signs are not visible from off the property, there shall
be no limitation of size or height. When such signs are visible from off the property, they shall
not exceed sixty-four (64) square feet in area each. In addition, they shall be attached on the
interior of a fence or wall enclosing the facility and shall not exceed the height of the fence or
wall. However, where a fence or wall is not provided, the scoreboard or sign shall not exceed
a height of eight (8) feet and shall be located so that it is not intended for view off the property.
1000:4553.8
(Clean version of 4553.7)
- 10 -
026
-
-
(f) Multi-tenant office buildings which only provide common entrances for all tenants shall
be permitted a maximum of two (2) building mounted signs, no more than one (1) of which shall
be visible at one time from off the property. Additional building mounted tenant identification
signs not to exceed three (3) square feet in area or mounted no higher than the main entrance
shall be permitted provided the total area of all signs does not exceed the area permitted for the
building.
(g) Barber poles which are used to advertise establishments which cut hair shall be permitted
to revolve only when such poles are located within village districts. Such poles shall be building
mounted and not freestanding.
Division II - Buildin~ Mounted Si~ns
Sec. 21.1-270.8. Determination of Buildin~ Mounted Si~n Area.
(a) The total building mounted sign area permitted for any project, development or use shall
be calculated at one (1) square foot for each one (1) linear foot of building frontage,
provided that a minimum of twenty (20) square feet but no more than 150 square feet
shall be permitted. For buildings having frontage exceeding 150 feet, the permitted
building mounted sign area may be increased one (1) square foot for each additional
three (3) linear feet of building frontage. On individual sites or outparcels where
freestanding signs are permitted by another section, the permitted building mounted sign
area may be calculated at 1. 75 square feet of sign area for each one (1) linear foot of
building frontage provided a freestanding sign is not erected. Where individually
mounted or painted letters are used, the minimum area shall be increased to thirty (30)
square feet. Building frontage shall include canopy lengths in the case of service
stations and other uses providing drive-up windows.
Sec. 21.1-270.9. Calculation of Buildin~ Mounted Si~n Area.
Building mounted signs shall be calculated as follows:
(a) Projecting signs. The area of a projecting sign shall be calculated as the area of a
rectangle which encompasses the extreme limits of each individual sign face including
all advertising surfaces, background, framing and ornamentation which is visible from
any direction at one time.
(b) Canopy or awning signs. Canopies or awnings that are internally lighted and covered
with fabric, plastic or other similar translucent material that transmit light shall be
considered signs and shall be prohibited regardless of whether or not sign copy,
characters or logos are displayed upon them. Canopies or awnings containing lighting
fixtures which illuminate only items below the canopy or awning, but not the canopy or
awning itself, shall not be considered signs unless the canopy or awning contains sign
1000:4553.8
(Clean version of 4553.7)
- 11 -
027
-
copy, characters or logos. Canopies or awnings that have no internal lighting shall not
be considered signs unless the canopy or awning contains sign copy, characters or logos.
Where canopies or awnings contain sign copy, the area of these signs shall be measured
by calculating the total area of the surface upon which the sign copy is located.
(c) Individually mounted or painted letters. The area of individually mounted sign letters
or painted letters applied directly to the building face and which are not further
emphasized by an architectural or painted element of the building shall be calculated as
the sum of the area within a series of rectangles which encompasses each individual
letter or logo.
(d) All other building mounted signs. The area of all other building mounted signs... to
include signs written in cursive, shall be measured as the area within a single rectangle
which encompasses the extreme limits of all letters, logos, advertising surfaces,
background, framing, ornamentation or sign cans. Letters and logos not attached and
not provided on sign cans, boxes or awnings may be separately calculated by enclosing
them within their own rectangle.
Sec. 21.1-270.10. Sinele Family Residences.
(a) Signs used for the purposes of displaying the name of a house or a home occupation for
a single family residence shall be non-illuminated and no larger than one (1) square foot
10 area.
Sec. 21.1-270.11. All Other Buildinl:s.
(a) Where the side or rear lot line adjoins a residential, townhouse residential, multi-family
residential or agricultural district, the building mounted signs shall be attached flat
against the building and shall not face the adjacent lot in such districts unless such sign
is located at least 150 feet from such district.
(b) Signs may be mounted perpendicularly to a building provided that no sign shall project
more than thirty (30) inches from the building, roof or canopy system, exceed a face to
face thickness of six (6) inches or exceed the height of the soffit.
(c) No building mounted sign shall project above the roof line or parapet wall of any
building.
(d) On all commercial buildings which border roads or driveways or parking lots intended
for use by the general public on both the front and rear sides, the sign area for a single
tenant which extends from front to back of the building may be increased by 100%
provided that the sign area exposed to any single street or view is not increased beyond
what is normally permitted. This bonus shall be calculated based upon the maximum
1000:4553.8
(Clean version of 4553.7)
- 12 -
028
-
-
area of building signs permitted before any other bonus area is added.
(e) The maximum aggregate area of building mounted signs may be increased by fifty
percent (50 %) for buildings on lots located at the intersection of public roads provided
that the sign area exposed to any single street is not increased beyond what is normally
permitted. This bonus shall be calculated based upon the maximum area of building
signs permitted before any other bonus is added.
Division III. - Freestandine Siens
Sec. 21.1-270.12 Freestandine Sien Desien.
(a) Monument, pylon or mast arm style freestanding signs may be provided. All structural
supporting elements of freestanding signs shall be covered with a material having a
similar color and finish to the building which it advertises.
(b) Any freestanding sign in an 0-1 or C-I District shall conform to the Village standards.
(c) Any sign area may be increased by twenty-five percent (25 %) if an interchangeable copy
sign is included, except for those signs advertising movie theaters.
Sec. 21.1-270.13. Calculation of Freestandine Sien Area.
The area of a freestanding sign face shall be computed by means of the smallest square,
circle, rectangle, triangle, or combination thereof that will encompass the extreme limits of the
writing, representation, emblem, color, or other display, together with any material or color
forming an integral part of the background of the display or used to differentiate the sign from
the backdrop or structure against which it is placed, but not including any supporting framework,
bracing, or decorative wall or fence when such wall or fence otherwise meets these or other
regulations and is clearly incidental to the display itself. For a sign consisting of two (2) or
more sides, where the interior angle between any of the sides exceeds ninety (90) degrees, the
third and each succeeding sign face shall be counted when calculating sign area.
Sec. 21.1-270.14. Calculation of Freestandine Sien Heieht.
(a) Where the sign location lies below the road elevation nearest to it, the sign height shall
be measured from the average road grade of the nearest travel lane to the sign to the top
of the highest attached component of the sign or structure.
(b) Where the sign location lies above the road elevation nearest to it, the sign height shall
be measured from the normal finished grade of the site to the top of the highest attached
component of the sign or structure. Artificially increasing the height of the sign by
1000:4553.8
(Clean version of 4553.7)
- 13 -
029
-
"""....
berming or mounding dirt or other material at the sign base shall be prohibited.
Section 21.1-270.15. Freestandine Identification Si2ns.
Freestanding signs may be provided for the following circumstances as described below.
Area is measured in square feet and height is measured in feet. If a site fronts along two (2)
major arterials as indicated on the Comprehensive Plan, a freestanding sign may be permitted
on each major arterial.
(1) The following freestanding project identification signs are permitted:
a. Mixed use or multi-subdivision community identification signs.
1. When the development occupies 50 acres or less:
Countywide
Area Hgt.
Village
Area Hgt.
50 15
32
8
11. When the development occupies greater than 50 acres:
Countywide Village
Area Hgt. Area Hgt.
100 20
32
8
111. A fifty (50) square foot freestanding SIgn may be permitted at each
secondary entrance to the development.
b. Commercial/industrial project identification signs. These include shopping
center, office park, medical park, commercial park and industrial park
identification signs. when they identify a project 300,000 square feet or greater
of gross floor area.
Countywide
Area Hgt.
Village
Area Hgt.
100 20
32
8
c. Residential community identification signs. These include single family
subdivision (including individual subdivision identification signs within multi-
subdivision communities), townhouse community, apartment community and
1000:4553.8
(Clean version of 4553.7)
- 14 -
030
-
condominium community identification signs. One such sign shall be permitted
for each separate street entrance to the development. One (1) such sign shall
be permitted on each side of an entrance if both signs are attached to an
ornamental wall or feature. Sign area is calculated by number of units. Area
allowed is twenty (20) square feet for each 200 dwelling units in subdivisions
or projects with a guaranteed minimum area of 32 square feet and a maximum
of 100 square feet.
Countywide
Area Hgt.
32
15
Village
Area Hgt.
20
7
(2) The following freestanding building and use identification signs are permitted:
a. Residential building identification signs. These include historic buildings or
markers and historic single family building name signs. These must appear in
the County of Chesterfield, State of Virginia or National Historical Register.
Countywide
Area Hgt.
16 8
Village
Area Hgt.
16
8
b. Multi-family building name signs.
Countywide
Area Hgt.
16 8
Village
Area Hgt.
16
8
c. Other places of lodging to include group care facility, group homes, rest homes
and nursing homes.
Countywide
Area Hgt.
50 15
1000:4553.8
(Clean version of 4553.7)
Village
Area Hgt.
24
8
- 15 -
031
-
d. Hotels/motels
-,
When they front on interstate highways:
Countywide
Area Hgt.
150 20
Village
Area Hgt.
24
8
When they front on other highways:
Countywide
Area Hgt.
75 15
Village
Area Hgt.
24
8
e. Restaurants associated with hotels/motels.
When restaurants are freestanding buildings:
Countywide
Area Hgt.
20 8
Village
Area Hgt.
20
8
When restaurants are located within the hotel/motel:
Countywide
Area Hgt.
None None
Village
Area Hgt.
None None
f. Boarding houses or bed and breakfasts.
Countywide
Area Hgt.
16 8
Village
Area Hgt.
16
8
g. Public/semi-public uses. These include churches, schools, libraries, fire
stations, parks, rescue squads, water or sewer treatment facilities, cemeteries.
1000:4553.8
(Clean version of 4553.7)
- 16 -
032
-
-
When they front on roads which are at least four (4) lanes wide:
Countywide
Area Hgt.
50 20
Village
Area Hgt.
24
8
When they front on roads less than four (4) lanes wide:
Countywide
Area Hgt.
32 20
Village
Area Hgt.
24
8
h. Recreation/entertainment facilities.
Neighborhood recreation facilities:
Countywide
Area Hgt.
32 15
Village
Area Hgt.
24
8
Movie theaters (sign area is calculated by number of screens provided). Area
allowed per screen is twenty (20) square feet. Theaters are guaranteed a
minimum area of fifty (50) square feet and a maximum of 200 square feet.
Countywide
Area Hgt.
50 15
Village
Area Hgt.
24
8
Stadiums, arenas, places of public assembly with fixed seats.
Countywide
Area Hgt.
50 15
1000:4553.8
(Clean version of 4553.7)
Village
Area Hgt.
24
8
- 17 -
033
-
_.
Golf courses, driving ranges, miniature golf courses.
Countywide
Area Hgt.
50 15
Village
Area Hgt.
24
8
Indoor/outdoor health, fitness, social, recreational, fraternal clubs and lodges.
Countywide
Area Hgt.
50 15
Village
Area Hgt.
24
8
Bowling alleys, skating rinks.
Countywide
Area Hgt.
50 15
Village
Area Hgt.
24
8
1. Hospitals, funeral homes.
Countywide
Area Hgt.
50 15
Village
Area Hgt.
24
8
J. Office and business buildings. These include professional, services, retail
stores, personal services, repair shops, banks, savings & loans, credit unions,
kennels, sit-down and fast-food restaurants, child and adult day care centers.
When they are freestanding:
Countywide
Area Hgt.
50 15
Village
Area Hgt.
24
8
Offices and industrial buildings when they are located within office or industrial
parks.
1000:4553.8
(Clean version of 4553.7)
- 18 -
034
Countywide
Area Hgt.
32 8
-~
Village
Area Hgt.
24
8
All other buildings when they are located within shopping centers or business
parks:
Countywide
Area Hgt.
20 8
Village
Area Hgt.
20
8
k. Greenhouses, nurseries, lawn and garden.
Countywide
Area Hgt.
50 15
Village
Area Hgt.
24
8
1. Vehicles, sales, service and rental.
Vehicles sales:
Countywide
Area Hgt.
50 20
Village
Area Hgt.
24
8
Service stations, car washes, vehicle rental and vehicle repair:
Countywide
Area Hgt.
50
15
Village
Area Hgt.
24
8
m. Warehouse and wholesale. These include mini-warehouses, warehouses,
wholesale houses and distributors.
Countywide
Area Hgt.
50 15
1000:4553.8
(Clean version of 4553.7)
Village
Area Hgt.
24
8
- 19 -
035
-
-
n. Industrial. These include manufacturing and fabrication and assembly uses,
contractor's building and storage yards.
When the facility occupies 25 acres or less:
Countywide
Area Hgt.
50 15
Village
Area Hgt.
24
8
When the facility occupies greater than 25 acres:
Countywide
Area Hgt.
100 15
o. Transportation uses.
Village
Area Hgt.
24
8
Taxi companies, train stations, bus stations and airports.
Countywide
Area Hgt.
50 15
Truck terminals.
Village
Area Hgt.
24
8
When they occupy 25 acres or less:
Countywide
Area Hgt.
50 15
Village
Area Hgt.
24
8
When they occupy greater than 25 acres:
Countywide
Area H gt.
100
15
1000:4553.8
(Clean version of 4553.7)
Village
Area Hgt.
24
8
- 20 -
oaG
-
p. Farming uses.
Farm I.D. signs. Signs displayed for the purpose of farm identification shall
be located on the farm premises, shall be setback at least fifty (50) feet from the
nearest corner of a street intersection, shall be painted or printed, and the total
aggregate area of all signs shall not exceed twelve (12) square feet.
Countywide
Area Hgt.
Village
Area Hgt.
12 10
12
7
Farm product signs. One (1) temporary sign advertising the sale of farm
products grown or produced on the premises; provided such signs shall not be
illuminated, shall be painted or printed, maintained in good condition, and shall
be removed within ten (10) days after the end of each season.
Countywide
Area Hgt.
Village
Area Hgt.
12 10
12
7
q. Freestanding directory/menu board signs.
Directory signs. A shopping center, office, industrial, commercial park or
similar group of buildings may have one (1) freestanding on-site directory sign
near each major entrance along a public road. Such sign(s) shall be limited to
identifying and providing directional information to the individual businesses
located within the development. These may include logos and/or business
names of individual businesses in the development.
Countywide
Area Hgt.
Village
Area Hgt.
20
8
20
8
1000:4553.8
(Clean version of 4553.7)
- 21 -
037
-
Menu/order boards. These may only be provided for buildings with stacking
lane windows. One may be provided for each stacking lane and shall be located
so that it is not legible from off the property.
Countywide
Area Hgt.
Village
Area Hgt.
30
6
12
6
r. Directional Signs.
On-site directionals. Directional signs indicating location of truck entrances,
employee parking, shipping and receiving, and similar activities; provided that
all such signs are located on the property of the business.
Countywide
Area Hgt.
Village
Area Hgt.
4
5
4
5
Off-site directional signs. Temporary off-site real estate signs, placed on
private property, directing the way to premises which are for sale or rent that
are open to the public for inspection shall be erected only while the building is
open to the public for inspection and shall be removed when the agent or owner
closes the building for public viewing. Each real estate agent or owner shall be
limited to one (1) sign per street intersection and one (1) sign per premises
being rented or sold. The message shall be restricted to "open house", a
directional arrow, the real estate company or owner's name, the logo, phone
number and the hours the building is open for inspection.
Countywide
Area Hgt.
Village
Area Hgt.
4
7
4
7
Church, school, hospital, park, library, scenic area, historic area, train station,
and airport signs. Any such signs and mounting shall not exceed seven (7) feet
in total height and not more than one (1) sign pertaining to a single place shall
be displayed along anyone (1) street. However, where there is a major
arterial, as designated by the Comprehensive Plan and the road has been
1000:4553.8
(Clean version of 4553.7)
- 22 -
038
..-
constructed as a four lane facility, two (2) directional signs may be erected
along such road provided there is not more than one (I) on each side of the
road.
Countywide
Area Hgt.
Village
Area Hgt.
7 7
7
7
(3) The following on-site real estate/construction signs are permitted.
a. Residential development project. One (1) temporary on-site real estate sign,
advertising a residential development project, provided such sign shall be
removed when ninety (90) percent of the dwelling units in the project are
occupied.
Countywide
Area Hgt.
Village
Area Hgt.
32 10
32
7
b. Commercial development project and construction/use/business/ designer
advertisement signs. One (1) temporary sign may be installed and maintained
on the premises for the purpose of advertising the use to be made of the
building or structure and the businesses and firms developing the building or
structure. Such sign may be installed only when actual construction is started
and shall be removed upon occupancy of the building or structure.
Countywide
Area Hgt.
Village
Area Hgt.
32 10
32
7
1000:4553.8
(Clean version of 4553.7)
- 23 -
039
-
---
c. Impending development sign. A single sign notifying that a development is
coming soon. This sign must be removed before erection of any other
commercial development or construction sign and in no instance shall be
permitted to remain longer than three (3) years.
Countywide
Area Hgt.
32 10
Village
Area Hgt.
32
7
d. Sale or rent of parcels of land with or without buildings in 0, C or I Districts.
One (1) temporary real estate sign, advertising the sale or rent of the premises
is permitted. Such sign shall be located on the premises and shall be removed
within ten (10) days after the transfer of deed or rental of such property.
However, if a sign no greater than 16 square feet is provided a County sign
permit shall not be required.
Countywide
Area Hgt.
32 10
Village
Area Hgt.
32
7
e. Sale or rent of residential premises sign. One (1) on-site temporary real estate
sign, not exceeding six (6) square feet in area, advertising the sale or rent of the
premises shall be permitted, provided such sign shall not be illuminated, shall
be maintained in good condition, and shall be removed within ten (10) days
after the transfer of title or rental of such property. However, if the property
fronts along a major arterial and is designated on the Comprehensive Plan for
non-residential use, the temporary sign shall meet the requirements for such
signs in the office, business and/or industrial districts.
Countywide
Area Hgt.
6
7
Village
Area Hgt.
6
7
With a maximum of two (2) riders.
Countywide
Area Hgt.
8
7
1000:4553.8
(Clean version of 4553.7)
Village
Area Hgt.
8
7
- 24 -
040
-
.-
f. "Open house" sign, on-site. Temporary on-site "open house" real estate signs
for residential premises for sale or rent. Such signs shall be erected only while
the home is open to the public for inspection and shall be removed when the
agent closes the house for public viewing that day . The message shall be
limited to "open house", the real estate company or owner's name, logo, phone
number and the hours the house is open for inspection.
Countywide
Area Hgt.
6
7
Village
Area Hgt.
6
7
(4) Permitted village entryway signs.
Countywide
Area Hgt.
70 12
Village
Area Hgt.
70
12
(5) Permitted civic community service organization and public interest signs.
a. Civic community service organization sign and home of the month/business of the
months signs.
Countywide
Area Hgt.
8
5
Village
Area Hgt.
8
5
b. Displays which contain political, campaign, religious, educational or charitable
messages or which advertise events for non-profit organizations.
Countywide
Area Hgt.
8
5
Village
Area Hgt.
8
5
(3) That Section 21.1-281 of the Code of the County of' Chesterfield. 1978. as amended. is
amended as follows:
1000:4553.8
(Clean version of 4553.7)
- 25 -
041
-
-
.-
Sec. 21.1-281 Definitions.
Awning - A shelter projecting from and supported by the exterior wall of a building
constructed on non-rigid materials on a supporting framework.
Copy - The graphic content of a sign surface in either permanent or removable letter,
pictographic, symbolic, or numeric form.
Flag - A piece of fabric or any non-rigid material of distinctive design, with colors, patterns,
etc., used as a symbol (as of a nation) such as the American flag or Commonwealth of Virginia
flag or which has a commercial message or logo or which is used as a signaling device to attract
attention and is usually displayed hanging free from a staff to which it is attached.
Pennants - A long piece of fabric or other non-rigid material that has small triangular shaped
flags attached to it.
Pole cover - Cover enclosing or decorating poles or other structural supports of a sign.
Roofline - The top edge of a roof or building parapet whichever is higher, excluding any
mansards, cupolas, pylons, chimneys or minor projections.
Sight distance triangle - A triangular area that is included between the lines of an intersecting
public street or private driveway and a straight line connecting them at a point twenty (20) feet
distant from the existing or proposed right of way line or private driveway intersection. The
driveway for a single-family or two-family residence shall not be subject to the above.
Sign - Any display of letter, figures, designs, devices, pictures, logos, emblems, insignia,
numbers, lines or colors or any combination thereof, visible to the public for the purpose of
making anything known or attracting attention.
Sign, awning - A sign painted on, printed on, or attached flat against the surface of an
awmng.
Sign, banner - A SIgn made of fabric or any non-rigid material with no enclosing
framework.
Sign, building mounted - A sign attached, erected, or painted on the outside wall of a
building and supported by any part of a building such as a wall, roof, window, door, canopy,
awning, arcade or marquee.
Sign, canopy - A sign affixed or applied to the exterior facing surface or surfaces of a
building or freestanding canopy.
1000:4553.8
(Clean version of 4553.7)
- 26 -
042
-
Sign, changeable - A sign whose informational content can be changed or altered by manual
or electric, electro-mechanical, or electronic means. Changeable signs include the following
types:
1. Manual: Signs whose alphabetic, pictographic, or symbolic informational content can
be changed or altered by manual means.
2. Electrical: Signs whose alphabetic, pictographic, or symbolic informational content can
be changed or altered on a fixed display surface composed of electrically illuminated or
mechanically driven changeable segments. Includes two (2) types:
a. Fixed Message Electronic Signs: Signs whose basic informational content has been
pre-programmed to include only certain types of information projection, such as time,
temperature, date.
b. Computer Controlled Variable Message Electronic Signs: Signs whose informational
content can be changed or altered by means of computer-driven electronic impulses.
Sign, construction - A temporary sign identifying an architect, contractor, subcontractor,
and/or material supplier participating in construction on the property on which the sign is
located.
Sign, detached - A sign attached to a flat surface such as a fence or wall and not part of a
building.
Sign, flashing or continuous reader board - Any sign displaying flashing or intermittent
lights, or other lights of changing degree of intensity, brightness or color, or electronically
moving copy. This definition shall not apply to signs which display public service information
such as time, date or temperature.
Sign, freestanding - A non-movable sign supported by a fence retaining wall, or by upright
structural members or braces on or in the ground and not attached to a building.
Sign, illuminated - A sign with an artificial light source incorporated internally or externally
for the purpose of illuminating the sign.
Sign, mast arm - A freestanding sign with a single, unenclosed upright. The sign face is
mounted under a (generally) horizontal arm mounted to the upright.
Sign, nameplate - A non-electric on-premise identification sign glvmg only the name,
address, and/or occupation of an occupant or group of occupants.
1000:4553.8
(Clean version of 4553.7)
- 27 -
043
-
_.
Sign, outdoor advertising - A sign, including billboards and painted walls, used as an
outdoor display for the purpose of making anything known, the matter advertised or displayed
not related to the premises where such sign is located or to which it is offered.
Sign, portable - A sign which is not permanently affixed to the ground, to a building, or
other unmovable structure and is designed or constructed in such a manner that it can be moved
or relocated without involving any structural or support changes and is in one of the following
forms: signs with attached wheels, sandwich boards, gas or hot or cold air filled balloons,
inflatables, ribbons, string of flags, tinsel, pennants.
Sign, projecting - A sign which is attached to and projects more than eighteen (18) inches
from the face of the wall of the building.
Sign, pylon - A freestanding sign that is supported by one (1) or more poles or posts or
other uprights and where the sign face is not encased within a structure.
Sign, real estate - Any sign which is used to offer property for sale, lease and/or rent and/or
development.
(4) T hat t his 0 r din a nee s h a I I bee 0 m e e f fee t i v e
1000:4553.8
(Clean version of 4553.7)
- 28 -
044
-
-
~\~h;~ C~~ ~i;hrJ
"
Part 1
Selection of a reasonable minimum standard for the duration of
messaqe "on-time" should be correlated wi th the length of the
messaae or messaae element. Experience of state highway aqencies
indicates that comprehension of a message displayed on a panel of
three lines havina 20 characters per line is best when the on-time
is 15 seconds. In contrast, the customary practice of signing
which displavs time and temperature is to have shorter on-times of
3 to 4 seconds (Report No. FHWA/RD-80/05l).
A simple format for the most efficient presentation of information
from an electronic displav to the travelina public is to allow two
(2) seconds per line of COpY. The Richmond Honda sign is a two
line displav so messaae chanaes have been programmed on four (4)
second intervals.
Since the average glance duration is generally accepted to be 0.3
second. the Richmond Honda display time per messaqe of four (4)
second intervals will require less than 10 percent of the driver's
available visual search time.
To use significantly greater or lesser message change frequency
would be to disregard not only the safety information contained in
numerous federal reports and academic studies, but also the
outstand ing safety record of these displays operating wi thin a
myriad of communities and applications across the nation.
Since all sian codes regulate an industrv recognized by federal
law, it is essential that terms familiar to that industry be used
in the code. The use of clear and precise language is crucial.
Definitions which are vaque or overly inclusive will be useless or
may cause leaal and administrative difficulties.
Accordinq to federal law and Virqinia law the electronic changeable
messaqe siqn is plainlY distinauished from that of a flashing
and/or animated siqn.
The Federal Htqhway Beautification Law, which regulates outdoor
advertisina on interstate and federal and primary highways in the
US. specifically allows for electronic changeable message signs
"advertisinq actJyt_~J~~" conducted on the property on which they
are located. (Sec. 131(c)(3) Hiahway Beautification Act of 1965,
Title 1, Public Law 89-285, October 22, 1965, as amended.) The law
reads, "s ians, displays or dev ices erected wi th the purpose of
their messaae beina read from the main traveled way shall be
limited to sians, displays and devices, including those which may
be changed at reasonable intervals by electronic process or by
remote control, advertising activities conducted on the property on
which they are located."
--
Part 2
The Code of Vi rg inia S. S. 33.1-369 reads, "No advert isement or
advertising structure shall be erected, maintained or operated
which involves motion or rotation of any part of the structure,
moving reflective disks, or displays an intermittent light or
lights visible from any highway. The prohibition of this
subsection shall not apply to an on-premises advertisement or
advertisinq structure with the message changed by electronic means
or remote control, programmed or sequenced to change no mOre than
once while visible to a given motorist traveling at the posted
speed."
A flashina sian is a sian which seeks to attract attention to
itself or its fixed messaae by means of a sequential or
intermittent display of liaht. In this context, the flashing mode
of operation is employed primarily as an attention arresting
device. Electronic changeable message signs also utilize a
seauent ial display of 1 ight, but only as a means to ef fectuate
chanqes in "pixel" configuration on the display background. This
seauential action involves certain individual "pixels" being turned
off. while other individual "pixels" are turned on, which results
in the message change. Flashing, on the other hand, would involve
the action of rapidly turning the same "pixels" off and on.
Al though true flashing can be made part of the program of an
electronic changeable message sign, it is not central to the
operation of the medium.
Continuous reader board displays present messages as a train of
words moving continuously across a display from left to right. Run-
on sign displays are also called moving message or continuous
message or traveling message displays. A common example of run-on
messaqes is the special message bulletins frequently shown at the
bottom of a television screen.
Research has indicated that traveling messages or continuous
messages are not suitable for displaying messages to the traveling
publ ic at highway speeds, and are therefore not recommended.
Although continuous and/or traveling messages can be made part of
the program of an electronic changeable message sign, it is not
central to the operation of the medium.
The Richmond Honda display utilizes sequential formatting and is
accomplished by dividina the message into parts. Each. part is
exposed in seauence for a set per iod of time to present safe,
efficient and easy to read information to the traveling public.
Thus, in its primary role of providing changeable information, the
electronic display at Richmond Honda should not be considered to be
a flashing and continuous reader board sign. This display
technology has been exhaustively tested and successfully regulated
on it-s own merits, and should not be restricted by earlier,
outdated definitions.
-
_.
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Page -2. of2-
Meeting Date:
August 24, 1994
Item Number:
7.A.
Subject:
DEFERRED
Consideration of Request of Comcast Cablevision of Chesterfield County, Inc. for a Renewal of its
Cable Television Franchise and Adoption of Amendments to Chapter 7 of the Coun1;y Code Related
to Providing Cable Television Services in the County
County Administrator's Comments:
countyAdministrator:k$R~ y../.ti
BoardAction Re-.uested:
Summary ofInformation:
This item was deferred from the July 27 meeting to allow Comcast and County staff to
finalize the terms of the franchise documents, in particular clarifying how access charges for
institutional network (INET) services will be calculated.
Negotiations with Comcast have not been concluded at the time the agenda is being sent.
As soon as Comcast's corporate position has been ascertained, we will deliver a more complete
agenda item.
Preparer
Title:
County Attorney
0603m44.2(AgreempZ741l1. "'d~~5 7/l7R 1) I
Attachments:
DYes
. No
-
-
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Page ~of3-
Meeting Date:
August 24, 1994
Item Number:
7.B.
Subject:
DEFERRED
Approval of an Amendment to the Moral Obligation Agreement with Richmond Metropolitan
Authority (RMA) for Refinancing Bonds for The Diamond, and Authorization for the Execution
of Refinancing Documents
County Administrator's Comments:
~~
countyAdministrator:~~~)1r~
BoardAction Requested:
Staff recommends that the Board approve the Amendment to the RMA Moral Obligation
Agreement relating to The Diamond and authorize execution of refinancing documents.
Summary of Information:
In August 1989 the Board of Supervisors approved a moral obligation agreement in which
the Board agreed to pay one-third of any revenue shortfall if the revenues of The Diamond were
insufficient to pay both 1) operating expenses of The Diamond and 2) debt service on RMA's
$3,810,000 Series 1984 Stadium Bonds which financed construction of the stadium. Henrico County
and the City of Richmond are also parties to the moral obligation agreement. The RMA is
proposing to refinance the Series 1984 Stadium Bonds. The Series 1984 Bonds are currently
secured by the revenues of The Diamond, the moral obligation agreement and a separate letter of
credit. The proposed refinancing of the 1984 Bonds will carry a significantly lower interest rate and
will eliminate the letter of credit so that the primary security for the Series 1994 Bonds will be the
moral obligation agreement.
Savings to the County will occur both from a lower interest rate and elimination of fees paid
to the letter of credit in force. The Series 1994 Bonds will reduce interest payments by $817,025
over the next ten (1 s eli . ate $184,529 in letter of credit fees over ten (10) years, for
ontinued)
County Attorney
Title:
Preparer:
1103:7421.1
1#
046
Attachments:
DYes
. No
..
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Page ..L oU
Summary of Information: (Continued)
a total reduction in debt service of $926,554 over the next ten (10) years (after deducting $75,000
for the cost of issuing the Series 1994 Bonds). While the RMA will realize this debt service
reduction, the effect on the County's moral obligation is less direct, and depends on other revenue
and expense items for The Diamond, such as the renewal of the agreement with the Braves and
the renewal of skybox leases, all of which expire in December of this year. Therefore, the County
cannot assess the impact of the proposed refinancing on the annual amount the County
appropriates to The Diamond, except that it will reduce the debt service portion of the moral
obligation payments.
Staff recommends that the Board approve the refinancing and the Amendment to the Moral
Obligation Agreement. Staff also recommends that the Board authorize the County Administrator
and his designated staff to execute necessary refinancing documents.
I # 047
-
-
6)
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Page L of A
Meeting Date: August 24, 1994
I tern Number:
7.C.
Subject:
Deferred Streetlight Installation Cost Approval
County Administrator's Comments:
~~
countyAdmlnistrator:1ur"~ f' J.:IIl
BoardAction Requested:
This item requests Board approval of a deferred Streetlight Installation Cost in the Clover Hill District.
Summary of Information:
Streetlight requests from individual citizens or civic groups are received in the Department of
Environmental Engineering. Staff requests cost quotations from Virginia Power for each request
received. When the quotation is received, staff re-examines each request and presents them at the next
available regular meeting of the Board of Supervisors for consideration. Staff provides the Board with
an evaluation of each request based on the following criteria:
1. Streetlights should be located at intersections;
2. There should be a minimum average of 600 vehicles per day (VPD) passing the requested
location ifit is an intersection, or 400 VPD if the requested location is not an intersection;
CONTINUED NEXT PAGE
Preparer: J?)J)lIJc ~...<'
Richard M:"'McElfish, P.E.
Title:
Director
Pn,,.ironrnent~l Pnglnppring
Attachments:
. Yes
D
No
1#
048
I
-
-
i
I
Page ~ orA
6)
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Summary of Information: (Continued)
3. Petitions are required and should include 75% of residents within 200 feet of the requested
location and if at an intersection, a majority of those residents immediately adjacent to the
intersection.
Cost quotations from Virginia Power are valid for a period of 60 days. The Board, upon presentation
of the cost quotation, may approve, defer, or deny the expenditure of funds for the streetlight installation.
If the expenditure is approved, staff authorizes Virginia Power to install the streetlight. A denial will
cancel the project and staff will so notify the requestor. A deferral will be brought before the Board
again when specified.
CLOVER HILL DISTRICT:
* Deferred from the February 23, 1994, Board meeting:
Pecan Terrace, in cul-de-sac
Cost to install light: $ 1,763.00
Does not meet minimum criteria for intersection or vehicles per day.
Clover Hill Streetlight Funds
Requested Effective
Balance Forward Expenditure Balance Remaining
$28,124.00
$1,763.00
$26,361.00
049 I!
1#
STREETLIGHT REQUEST ~
Clover Hill District
REQUEST
RECEIVED: September 17, 1991
ESTIMATE
REQUESTED: January 10, 1992
ESTIMATE
RECEIVED: July 15, 1992
DAYS ESTIMATE
OUTSTANDING: 187
COST TO INSTALL STREETLIGHT: $1763.00
NAME OF REQUESTOR: Fred Little
ADDRESS: 12906 Pecan Terrace, Midlothian, VA 23113
PHONE NUMBER: HOME - 744-1950
WORK - 755-5369
c==J REQUEST IS LOCATED AT THE INTERSECTION OF
o
REQUEST IS NOT AT AN INTERSECTION.
Pecan Terrace, in cul-de-sac
REQUESTED
LOCATION IS
c==J A POLE ALREADY EXISTS AT THIS LOCATION.
POLICY CRITERIA:
INTERSECTION:
VEHICLES PER DAY:
PETITION:
Not Qualified, location not an intersection
Not Qualified, less than 400 VPD
Qualified
COMMENTS: Location approved at the January 8, 1992, Board meeting.
Deferred from the August 26, 1992, Board meeting to the February 24,
1993, meeting.
Deferred from the February 24, 1993, Board meeting to the August 25,
1993, meeting.
Deferred from the August 25, 1993, Board meeting to the February 23,
1994 meeting.
Deferred from the February 23, 1994, Board meeting to the August 24,
1994 meeting.
Cost quoted is the latest received from Virginia Power.
Attachments? Map
050
~-'reetlight Request M~~}
8/24/94
~
<J
~
~
~
12>
~~
~
~~
&-
~
~
CHESTNUT CT
This map i.. " ('.Opyright~A product of
the Chesterfield Counry GIS Offi<:e
Streetlight Legend
~
~-
~
[+] existing light
.J requested light
Sc:ALE 1 ; 4985
"11.32 206.F'Ii
[-::-:~__.__~_.__ _.=1
1 -"., 411..12 ,..,
MARKEl 5
c:;.
~
t"'f"\
~
This map shows citizen requested
streetlight in..'1tallations in relation
to existing streetlight.'!.
Existing streetlight infonnation was
obtained from the Chesterfield County
Environmental Engineering Department.
ifU.72
-
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Page :L of..tZ.
Meeting Date: August 24, 1994
Item Number:
8.A.
Subject:
Streetlight Installation Approval
County Administrator's Comments:
~~
County Administrator: ~R~ 'j-Ja-
BoardAction Re~uested:
This item requests Board approval of a Streetlight Installation in the Matoaca District.
Summary of Information:
Streetlight requests from individual citizens or civic groups are received in the Department of
Environmental Engineering. Staff requests cost quotations from Virginia Power for each request
received. When the quotation is received, staff re-examines each request and presents them at the next
available regular meeting of the Board of Supervisors for consideration. Staff provides the Board with
an evaluation of each request based on the following criteria:
1. Streetlights should be located at intersections;
2. There should be a minimum average of 600 vehicles per day (VPD) passing the requested
location if it is an intersection, or 400 VPD if the requested location is not an intersection;
. CONTINUED NEXT PAGE
~ ~ .
Preparer: 1l11Jl' ~
Richard M. cElfish, P.E.
Title:
Director
ERyifGmlleRt:d ERgiReeriRg
I #
052
I
Attachments:
. Yes
D No
-
.-
6)
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Page ~ of3-
Summary of Information: (Continued)
3. Petitions are required and should include 75% of residents within 200 feet of the requested
location and if at an intersection, a majority of those residents immediately adjacent to the
intersection.
Cost quotations from Virginia Power are valid for a period of 60 days. The Board, upon presentation
of the cost quotation, may approve, defer, or deny the expenditure of funds for the streetlight installation.
If the expenditure is approved, staff authorizes Virginia Power to install the streetlight. A denial will
cancel the project and staff will so notify the requestor. A deferral will be brought before the Board
again when specified.
MATOACA DISTRICT:
*
Weldon Street, mid-point, vicinity of 18921
Cost to install light: $ 0.00
Does not meet minimum policy criteria for intersection, vehicles per day or petition.
Mataoca Streetlight Funds
Requested Effective
Balance Forward Expenditure Balance Remaining
$19,508.00
$0.00
$19,508.00
I # 053
STREETLIGHT REQUEST
Matoaca District
REQUEST
RECEIVED: December 21, 1993
ESTIMATE
REQUESTED: February 9, 1994
ESTIMATE
RECEIVED: July 21, 1994
DAYS ESTIMATE
OUTSTANDING: 162
COST TO INSTALL STREETLIGHT: $0.00
NAME OF REQUESTOR: Sheila B. Soloe
ADDRESS: 18921 Weldon Street, Colonial Heights, VA 23834
PHONE NUMBER: HOME - 526-6149
WORK - 275-2631
D
REQUEST IS LOCATED AT THE INTERSECTION OF
o
REQUEST IS NOT AT AN INTERSECTION. REQUESTED LOCATION IS
Weldon Street, on existing pole at midpoint of street
o A POLE ALREADY EXISTS AT THIS LOCATION.
POLICY CRITERIA:
INTERSECTION:
VEHICLES PER DAY:
PETITION:
Not Qualified, location not an intersection
Not Qualified, less than 400 VPD
Not Qualified, less than 75% of residents
within 200 feet of location
COMMENTS: Requestor states: "We would like this light in the middle
between two intersections."
Attachments? Map
054
::-reetlight Request Mt~.,
8/24/94
PINt
(;~o~
'(11'
~
~"
#
~~
e:.-:
u.J
.....
......
u.J
....,
This map i.< " copyrjgh1~d product of
the Ch"./eTjidd County ars o.flice
~
Streetlight Legend ~}
It] exi,'(tinR light 1
[_I requested light ,
This map shows citizen requested
streetlight installations in relation
to existing streetlights.
Existing streetlight information was
ohtained from the Chesterfield County
Environmental Engineering Department.
lMtt.76 49..7.3lt
fIIIfi.7f>
~
~
fc .
BCALE I : nUl
[=-=~~~-=--~.............-
1 - => 1166. 76 ,..,
55
-
-
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Page --1..of....L
Meeting Date:
Auqust 24, 1994
Item Number:
B.B.I.
Subject: Request New position
County Administrator's Comments:
~~
countyAdministrator~l2~ Iftc. ~
!/
BoardActionRequested: To appropriate additional state revenue of $15,500
and authorize creation of a Full-time Senior Office Assistant position
for the Pretrial Release Program.
Summary of Information: The Department of Criminal Justice Services has
increased the Pretrial Release Grant Budget for Fiscal year 1995 from
$109,400 to $124,900. The additional $15,500 will allow for an upgrade
of an existing part time position to full time. The heavy work load in
the Pretrial Release Program warrants full time support and a full time
Senior Office Assistant will allow the Program to better meet our pro-
gram goals and requirements.
The Pretrial Release Program interviews offenders who are held in a
Pretrial status, record checks are conducted, information verified, and
a report is provided to the Court to assist the Court in making more
informed bond decisions. Pretrial Release supervises defendants who as a
condition of release must report for drug screening, alcohol testing and
supervision. Cases are monitored until their return for trial. In
FY94 a total of 1,529 interviews were conducted and a total of 272 cases
were placed for supervision.
The Senior Office Assistant provides critical support to the program,
runs record checks and assists with client contacts in the absence of
.
a casemanager.
Preparer:
~ 1-)
~ .. _ D (/' -t.-.--
f-~ ~ "< ~'Lu~"t--....
Glen R. Peterson
Title:
CDI Program Director
Attachments:
DYes
. No
I #
.'
056
@ ..._~__c
CHESTERFIELD COUNT\
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Page l- of..L
Meeting Date:
lU1g:11~T 14, 1994
Item Number:
8.B.2.
Subject:
Application for a Section 319 Non-Point Source Program Implementation
Grant, FY 1995.
County Administrator's Comments:
~~
County Administrator. U"~~ ~
BoardAction Requested:
Appropriation of match funds in the amount of $15,000 to support a 319
Non-point Source Program Grant proposal, to be spread over two fiscal
years.
Summary of Information:
Section 319 of the Clean Water Act requires EPA to make grants to
states to implement non-point Source Management Programs. Non-point
source refers to drainage that does not go through industrial outfalls bu
emanates from roofs, roads, lawns, parking lots, etc. Accordingly, the
Department of Conservation and Recreation requested proposals for
potential proj ects. One of the categories eligible for funding under
this program relates to the implementation of demonstration projects
such as retrofitting or constructing innovative Best Management
Practices (BMP) facilities. Staff has submitted a proposal for $50,000
to fund a demonstration project involving the retrofit of an existing
BMP facility located adjacent to the Harbour pointe Shopping Centre on
Route 360 in Midlothian. The purpose of the proposed retrofit is to
improve the pollutant removal efficiency of the facility as well as its
aesthetics. Area residents have expressed serious concern about the
pond's aesthetics and ability to remove pollutants. The project cycle
would be from bruary 1995 - January 1997. If awarded, EPA will award
60% of the pr ect co t, or $30,000. Therefore, $20,000 would .have to
be provided a loca match. It is anticipated that $5,000 of this
Title:
Environmental Coordinator
Engineering
Attach
. Yes
D No
1#
057
-
-
)0
.
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Page -l... oi.L
I
I
,
I
Summary of Information: (Continued) J
match will be in the form of in-kind services by the Environmenta
Engineering Department and other sources. In addition, attempts arq
being made. ~o encourag~ the developer responsible for the const7"uctiorf
of the fac~l~ty to prov~de'part of the local match. For the port~on not
contributed by the developer, it is anticipated that the Environmenta
Engineering and Utilities Department budgets will be contributing equa
components of the match spread over two fiscal years.
1#
058
I ,
I
,
-
-
~
~
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Page -L oLi.
Summary of Information: (Continued)
Budqet and Manaqement comments:
The attached grant, if granted by the Environmental Protection
Agency, would cross fiscal years 95 and 96. The total grant is
for $50,000 - $20,000 of which is to be derived from local sources.
$5,000 of the total $20,000 local match is composed of in-kind
services which involve review work that is normally done by a
contractor. Environmental Engineering will do this review work and
then charge the grant. The remaining $15,000 in local funding will
be split among the Environmental Engineering and utilities
Departments. Both departments will absorb these costs for both
years that the grant will be in process. The local costs of this
grant are as follows:
FY95:
FY96:
In-Kind services
5,000
Environmental Engineering:
3,750
3,750
utilities:
3,750
3,750
------
------
------
------
TOTAL:
12,500
7,500
/"'.
(
. a:..,.,.-t.;... ;I
Il ~-i / -,
I! . /i A
'-..' {-.'.i~~'l./ ~~_~
....
&ames J.-stegmaier, Director
Budget and Management
1#
059
I
Project Name: Retrofit of Existing Urban Best Management
Practice Facility
APplicant:
Chesterfield County
P. O. Box 40
Chesterfield, Virginia 23832
NPS Category: Urban
POSI
Category: Demonstration Project
Funds
Requested: $30,000.00
Total Project
Cost: $50,000.00
060
Page 1
a. Executive Summary
Chesterfield County is proposing to use Section 319 funds to
convert an existing wet pond Best Management Practice (BMP)
Facility into a stormwater wetland system. The facility is
(Harbour pointe village) is on a commercial site located on
Route 360, approximately one mile west of Route 288 in
Midlothian. The site is in the Swift Creek Reservoir Watershed.
The stormwater wetland system will serve as a demonstration
project to illustrate innovative BMP technology. The objectives
of the project are to improve the facility's pollutant removal
efficiency and its aesthetic value.
The project's concept was developed by the residents'
association representing the adjacent property owners who
became concerned about the adequacy of the facility in removing
pollutants from stormwater.
Given the
and the
improving
critical
project.
potential adverse impacts on the downstream channels
site's close proximity to Swift Creek Reservoir,
the facility's pollutant removal efficiency is of
important. This is the primary objective of the
The second key obj ecti ve is to improve the pond's aesthetic
value. It is proposed that aesthetics will be improved by
reducing the height of the structure's embankment and exposing
the visual amenity created by the wetland.
In converting the wet pond into a stormwater wetland, two design
options will be considered. The first option would involve the
installation of a shallow marsh with a sediment forebay and a
micropool. The second option involves the construction of a
pond/wetland system consisting of two separate cells -- a deep
pond leading to a shallow wetland.
Both designs are taken from the document entitled "Design of
Stormwater Wetland Systems" written by Thomas R. Schueler. Both
options would involve relocating the existing riser and reducing
;the embankment's heights. Figures illustrating the design
concepts, as taken from the above cited manual, are attached.
b. Project Justification
Background
The project involves the retrofitting of an existing wet pond
facility into a constructed stormwater wetland. The pond is
served by a commercial site encompassing a 7.2 acre drainage
area. The si te is currently under construction. This
construction is the second phase of a multi-phased commercial
development including retail, fast food and business uses. The
061
-
Page 2
first phase of the development involved the construction of a
shopping center. This second phase is directly adjacent to the
shopping center.
The development is surrounded on the north and east by a
residential community known as Harbour pointe. This community
is represented by the Harbour pointe Residents' Association who
developed the concept for this project and are in support of the
grant proposal. The entire complex is located on the northern
side of Route 360 in Midlothian. According to the County's
Comprehensive Plan, this corridor is slated for a mix of
commercial and industrial uses.
Importantly, the subject site as well as the surrounding area,
is part of the Swift Creek Reservoir Watershed. consequently,
pollutant loads from any development in the watershed will drain
into the Reservoir -- which is the source of roughly 50% of
Chesterfield County's water supply. Therefore, it is critical
that pollutant loadings to the Reservoir be reduced to the
maximum extend practicable. This Watershed has been given a
high priority ranking in the Department of Conservation and
Recreation's "Nonpoint Source Pollution Watershed Assessment
Report".
1. Project Description
As stated in the executive surrunary, the two objectives of the
project are to increase the pond's pollutant removal efficiency
and improve its aesthetic value for area residents. It is
critical that pollutant removal be maximized given the
facility's proximity to the Swift Creek Reservoir, and to
m~n~m~ze the impacts on the downstream channels. It is
important to note that the subject stream channels pass close by
residences. The area residents view the existing pond's
embankment as an eyesore to the community due to its heights.
The retrofitting of the existing wet pond into a constructed
stormwater wetland will involve three primary tasks. In the
first task, two wetland systems, a shallow marsh and a
pond/wetland system, will be evaluated to determine which of the
designs best meets the project objectives. This task will also
involve undertaking the detailed engineering of the selected
design alternative and the development of a pondscaping plan.
The second task will be the actual conversion of the facility
into a wetland system. The third task will involve the
monitoring of the facility after it becomes operational. These
tasks are described in more detail below.
Task 1
The first element of this task ~tlill be the evaluation of the
shallow marsh and pond/wetland systems to determine which of
062
.-
-
Page 3
these best meets the project objectives. It is the intention of
the County to utilize the services of a consultant withtletlands
and engineering expertise in determining which design to use.
The same consultant will develop the detailed engineering plans
for the selected alternative. Figures illustrating the two
designs being considered, as taken from the Stormwater Wetland
Systems Manual, are attached.
As currently designed, the treatment volume required in order to
conform with the Chesapeake Bay Preservation .Z\ct, is 24,893
cubic feet. As designed and constructed, the volume provided is
24,893 cubic feet plus approximately 37,462 cubic feet of dry
storage for Peak storage for the 100 year storm plus an
addi tional volume to the top of the embankment for a total of
79,063 cubic feet. As certified in the field, the top of the
embankment is currently at elevation 255.5. The bottom
elevation is 247.5. The phosphorus removal efficiency of the
facility, as listed in the Chesapeake Bay Local Assistance
Department Manual, is 40%. It has been estimated that the area
required for the establishment of the shallow marsh would be
approximately 17,000 square feet, and approximately 11,000
square feet for the pond/wetland system. Estimates show that in
reducing the embankment and excavating the embankment I s inside
slopes there is more than adequate area to install either
wetland design while meeting both the Chesapeake Bay and
stormwater quantity requirements.
The basic design concepts that will be used for the wetland
system will be to establish a system of deep pools and high and
low marsh areas to improve the phosphorus removal efficiency of
the facility. In determining the allocation of these areas,
the table entitled "Guidelines for the Allocation of Depth Zones
and Treatment Volume in Stormwater Wetland Systems: from the
Stormwater Wetlands Systems Manual will be followed. Further,
the wetlands consultant who will be designing the facility will
be directed to insure that the design meets the sizing criteria
included in the above referenced manual. The facility will
incorporate such pollutant removal pathways as sedimentation,
physical filtration by plants, and biological and chemical
uptake of the wetlands.
The stormwater wetland's design will also include the reduction
of the height of the embankment from an elevation of 255.5 to
one of 250 or 251. In addition, the inner part of the
embankment will be excavated to reduce the width of the top of
the bank and assure that the facility will have enough volume to
contain the 100 year storm. Portions of the pond bottom would
be excavated to incorporate the establishment of small permanent
pools and high and low marsh areas. The size of these areas
will depend upon the wetland design chosen during this Task. If
the pond/wetland design is chosen, a safety bench will be
incorporated into the area of the deep pool.
063
-
-
Page 4
The pond design will
the establishment of
the relocated barrel.
into a level spreader
also incorporate relocating the riser and
a channel leading out from the outlet of
Currently, the existing structure drains
then into several braided streams.
Finally, a pondscaping plan will be developed during this Task.
The pondscaping plan will include measures to enhance the
aesthetics of the existing facility. In particular, the plan
will call for plantings for the basin's south slope (which faces
residences) and appropriate trees on top of that slope in order
to provide screening from the existing shopping center.
Task 2
The first part of the implementation phase of the project will
involve construction activities including the reduction of the
embankment, the excavation of the inside of the embankment and
relocating the riser structure. Prior to the initiation of the
construction, all appropriate erosion and sediment measures will
be put in place. In reducing the height of the embankment by 4
- 5 feet, the top of the structure will be too wide. The
excavation of the inside of the embankment after it is lowered
will have the two-fold benefit of reducing the width of the top
to approximately 8 feet and ensuring that the storage capacity
of the facility will be enough to contain the 100 year storm.
The next phase of this Task will be to install either the
pond/wetland or shallow marsh system. As has already been
stated, this will involve the excavation of portions of the
existing facility for the placement of deep pools and high and
low marsh areas. The allocation of these areas will depend upon
which design is selected.
The final phase of implementation will be the additional
landscaping prescribed by the pondscaping plan.
All phases of construction will be overseen by the wetlands
consultant who designed the system.
Task 3
This task will involve the monitoring to determine the pollutant
removal efficiency of the facility. The monitoring will involve
taking grab samples during storm events from the inflow and
outflow points and having the samples analyzed for total
suspended solids and total phosphorus. Samples will be taken
from at least one representative storm event for each of the
four seasons. The sampling program will be initiated after
construction in the contributing drainage area has been
completed and the area stabilized.
064
-
Page 5
Relationship to Identified NPS Priority
and APproved Management Program
One of the stated NPS priorities is the support of the
implementation of the Chesapeake Bay Preservation Act and the
use of tools to improve nonpoint source components. This
project addresses this goal because it will demonstrate the
effective use of specific, more innovative pond design criteria.
The use of these more innovative design elements will have the
effect of maximizing the pollutant removal efficiency for the
BMP facilities being required in conformance with the Chesapeake
Bay Preservation Act. This is no small factor considering that,
for Chesterfield County along, some 160 BMP facilities have been
constructed since the County began implementing the Bay Act in
1990. Since the entire County is designated as a Chesapeake
Bay Preservation Area, and since there is a great deal of
developable area within the County, we can expect that many more
BMP facilities will be built in the coming years. This grant
will help us show that the use of innovative designs which
maximize pollutant removal is in fact feasible and practicable.
The project also addresses another NPS priority in that it
represents the use of a relatively new BMP technology. Our
experience with this technology will be transferable in that it
will be made available to other localities within the State.
As can be seen in the Project Description, the project involves
the installation of one of the designs contained Thomas R.
Schueler's "Design of Stormwater Wetlands systems". While the
use of constructed stormwater wetlands is not an entirely new
idea, it is not an approach that is widely used in the design of
BMP's. Yet, these systems have the dual benefit of, in many
instances, improving pollutant removal efficiency and enhancing
the aesthetic quality of a BMP. Gi ven the proximity of many
BMP's to residences, the aesthetic enhancement is an important
consideration. This project will show those who wish to design
more traditional BMP's that constructed stormwater wetlands are
feasible.
2. Responsible Parties
The responsible party for the project is Chesterfield County.
While the specific design of the proposed facility will be
undertaken by a consultant with both wetlands and engineering
expertise, the County will maintain oversigh"t responsibility.
Although there are no other agencies involved with this project,
we will keep representatives of the Chesapeake Bay Local
Assistance Department apprised during the design and
implementation phases of the project. As stated in the
executive summary, the concept for this project was presented to
the County by tl.e adj acent residential community, which is
065
-
-
Page 6
represented by the
letter of support
attached.
Harbour
for the
pointe Residents'
project from the
Association.
Association
A
is
c. Goals/Milestones
Milestone #1
The County is proposing that the project run for a two year
budget period, i.e. February 1995 - January 1997. As discussed
earlier, the first Task of this project will include the
selection of either a shallow marsh or pond/wetland design for
the constructed stormwater wetland. Inherent in this task is
the goal of choosing the design that enhances the pollutant
removal efficiency over what the current facility is designed to
achieve. The second goal is to improve the existing pond's
aesthetic value. The second part of this Task will involve the
detailed design of the retrofit and the development of a
pondscaping plan. The County will utilize the services of a
consultant with both wetlands and engineering expertise and who
has had specific experience with the design and installation of
these types of facilities. Our goal is to assure that the
result is a high quality and effective design.
We anticipate performing Task 1 in the first year of the
project, from February of 1995 to January of 1996.
Milestone #2
The second Task involves the implementation of the project as
designed in the first Task. The first phase of the
implementation will be the reduction in the height of the
embankment, the excavation of the inside of the embankment and
the relocation of the riser. Prior to this construction phase,
all appropriate erosion and sediment control devices will be put
in place. Once the construction has been completed, the shallow
marsh or pond/wetland can be installed. The goal is to reduce
or eliminate the amount of construction that is done in wet
weather, thereby diminishing the potential for sediment loss
during construction and preventing impacts on downstream
channels and Swift Creek Reservoir to the greatest extent
practicable.
Milestone #3
This task involves the implementation of a sampling program to
determine the pollutant removal efficiency of the facility
compared with the more traditional types of BMP's. As described
earlier, grab samples will be taken from the facility's inflow
and outflow points during a series of storm events. These
samples will be analyzed for total suspended solids and total
066
--
Page 7
phosphorus. The results of the sampling program will be used by
the County to determine the effectiveness of the facility and
will be made available to the Chesapeake Bay Local Assistance
Department staff and other localities within the state
interested in utilizing this kind of facility.
Responsible Parties and Time Schedule for Implementation
Task #1 - Section of Design, Development of Detail Design
The party responsible for the implementation of this Task will
be the County of Chesterfield. The County will utilize the
services of a consultant with wetlands and engineering expertise
during this Task. This Task will be completed during the first
year of the project, from February 1995 to January 1996.
Task #2 - Construction of stormwater Wetland
The party responsible for this task will be the County of
Chesterfield. The wetlands/engineering consultant will also be
used to oversee the wetlands construction/i~stallation
activities. The overall time frame for these activities will be
from January of 1996 through ,June of 1996. The window of
opportunity for the establishment of wetlands planting is
approximately from April through June.
Task #3 - Monitoring
The party responsible for the monitoring component will be the
County of Chesterfield. It is anticipated that the samples will
be taken by County staff and that the analyses will be performed
in the Swift Creek Water Treatment Plant Laboratory. This Lab
is State certified. This Task will be undertaken July of 1996
through January of 1997.
d. Budget
1.
Total Budget
Federal Match
Local Match
Source of Local
$50,000.00
30,000.00
20,000.00
Match Chesterfield County
.~pproximately $5,000 of the Local Match will be provided by
documentable, project related in-kind services. These services
will include in-house engineering staff time during the design
of the proposed facility and affininistration of the project as
well as the use of the Swift Creek Water Treatment Plant
Laboratory and staff for the monitoring component of the
project.
067
2. Budget Components
-Demonstration Project Design
$ 8,000.00
-Excavation/Construction
$22,000.00
$15,000.00
$ 3,000.00
-Installation of Stormwater Wetland
-Monitoring Program
-Staff (In-House Engineering Review
Administration)
$ 2,000.00
Page 8
068
-
-
Meeting Date:
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page ~of2
AGENDA
August 24, 1994 Item Number: 8.B.3.
Subject:
School Auditor Position
County Administrator's Comments:
~~
County Administrator: ~~ ~
BoardAction Requested:
Ltf(L
Transfer $35,400 from the General Fund, Internal Audit Department to the
School Fund Operating Fund, Administration.
Summary ofInformation:
The FY95 Adopted Budget included $35,400 in the Internal Audit Department
for an auditor position. The purpose of the position was to increase
audit coverage for the school system. The School Finance Division and
the Internal Audit Department, have agreed to a reporting structure that
calls for the position to be paid out of the School Board Budget. This
arrangement has been approved by the Board of Supervisors/School Board
Liaison Committee, the school superintendent, the County Administrator,
and Cooper & Lybrand, the County's external auditors, with the
understanding that the structure will be re-examined in one year.
Preparer: C,,",, 1;1 ~i<0.. TItle:
/ Jaques J. . Stegmaier
~
n;,...~("'t-I"'I""
.
"Rl1nlJ~t- ;:!nn M;:!n;:!lJ~m~nt-
Attachments:
DYes
. No
1#
, 069
I
--
-.
~I~r(j:,
.~ 'B
~. ~~~,~
~~~
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Page ~ of2
Summary of Information: (Continued)
In order to charge the costs of the position to the School Board budget,
$35,400 needs to be moved from the Internal Audit Department and
appropriated in the school fund as follows:
General Fund
Revenue
Expenditures
Internal Audit Department
Transfer to Schools
Total
o
Q
o
($35,400)
35,400
o
School Fund
Transfer from General Fund
Administration, ATT. & H.
Total
$35,400
o
-
35.400
o
35,400
35,400
1#
070
I I
,...... ......
Meeting Date:
August 24, 1994
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page -Lof2-
AGENDA
Item Number:
8.B.4.
Subject:
Authorization to use balance of a $25,000 previously appropriated from Utility Inducement
Fund for payment of water and wastewater capital recovery charges for Hill Refrigeration to
refund Hill Phoenix, Inc. for payment of sewer assessment and development district fees
County Administrator's Comments: on tax map parcel #150-9-1-7.
~~~
CountyAdministrator: ~~~ f ~
BoardAction Re<luested:
Summary of Information:
As part of an economic development inducement package to bring Hill Refrigeration, Inc. to
Chesterfield County, the Board approved on July 27, 1994, using up to $25,000 in the Utility
Inducement Fund to payoff water and wastewater capital recovery charges that the Hill
project will be assessed. The Utilities Department has estimated that the capital recovery
charges for the project will be approximately $21,000.
On August 9, 1994, Hill was acquired by Phoenix Refrigeration System, Inc. and the plans
for the size of the project doubled. Hill will now build a 460,000 square foot plant and will
hire approximately 500 employees.
As further inducement for the project and in consideration of the increased size of the
project, Hill has asked that the unused portion of the $25,000 authorized for capital recovery
charges be paid directly to Hill to defray part of the approximate $42,000 Hill has paid to
the County in order to release sewer assessment liens on the site.
Preparer: ~): 7~
ary . Mc en
Title:
Director of Economic Development
1107:7453.1
1#
071
Attachments:
DYes
. No
..
6)
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Page 2 of2.
Summary of Information: (Continued)
Staff recommends authorizing the County Administrator to pay Hill the unused amount of the
previously authorized $25,000 as a refund for sewer assessment payments. The Utilities
Department estimates that the amount of refund will be approximately $4,000.
1#
072
I
-
-
August 24, 1994
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Page 2:.- of~
Meeting Date:
Item Number:
8.B.5.
Subject:
Create Active Code Enforcement Program in the Jefferson Davis Highway
and Ettrick Areas.
County Administrator's Comments:
~~
County Administrator: J1,~~9'1. h, ~
. ;)
BoardAction Requested:
Authorize an increase in the Planning Department personnel complement
for an additional Zoning Inspector position.
Summary of Information:
This request is for an additional Zoning Inspector within the Planning
Department to establish a new program of acti ve zoning enforcement
within the Jefferson Davis corridor area as recommended by the Jefferson
Davis Highway Plan and to add acti ve enforcement to our current
complaint based program in Ettrick.
This position will be funded through the Community Development Block
Grant program. No General Fund money will be used.
Approximately 80% of the current zoning enforcement program is in
response to citizen complaints. The remaining 20% of the program
involves the active pursuit of zoning violations in commercial corridors
along Routes 10, 60, 360 and landfills throughout the county. No active
program currently exists along the Jefferson Davis highway commercial
corridor or nearby residential neighborhoods or in the Village of
Ettrick.
Pr~arer: ~ (Q!:
Title:
Director of Planning
2AU02494 ,'A. AOENDA4/ go){
1# 07'3
Attachments:
DYes
. No
-
-
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Page ~ oU
Summary of Information: (Continued)
The Jefferson Davis Highway and Ettrick Village Plans contains numerous
goals and actions concerning code enforcement such as:
preserve existing, sound neighborhoods;
revitalize the existing business corridor;
control deterioration through code enforcement;
assist business persons in resolving code
enforcement and aesthetic issues;
address code enforcement relating to how this
service could be improved in the area;
work on code enforcement and appearance issues that
contribute to negative perceptions;
support code enforcement that will relieve the area
of negative influences caused by deterioration;
improve the overall aesthetic environment of
Ettrick neighborhoods;
encourage citizen participation efforts to improve
the overall aesthetic and environmental quality of
Ettrick.
The work program for this new position will differ from our typical
enforcement activity in that a significant effort will be spent on
coordinating public activity within the residential and commercial
communities. By explaining the community's goals as set forth in the
Plans, locating assistance for individuals in need, and encouraging
active participation by neighborhood and business groups, staff feels
the communities will progress beyond correcting code violations and move
into improving the aesthetics and quality of their areas.
The Planning Department's four (4) existing zoning inspectors received
1578 complaints in FY94. Without this requested position, the Planning
Department cannot provide the recommended level of code enforcement
without curtailing other active enforcement activity or reducing our
level of service to citizen complaints.
1#
074
-
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Meeting Date:
August 24, 1994
Item Number:
Page ..Lof~
REPLACF.T'1ENT
8.B.6.
Subject: Amendment to Minutes of June 22, 1994
County Administrator's Comments:
'1'< i).e t1/ll);r) c-~-(- (.I ·
1\,
County Administrator:
.'~:k
BoardAction Requested:
Amendment to minutes of June 22, 1994.
Summary ofInformation:
At the Board meeting on June 22, 1994, the Board held a public hearing
to consider granting Chesterfield Cablevision, Incorporated a renewal
of its cable television franchise and to adopt amendments to Chapter 7
of the Code of the County of Chesterfield, 1978, as amended, relating
to providing cable television services in the County. Presentations
were made by Mr. Mike Chernau, Assistant County Attorney, and Mr. Buck
Dopp, General Manager of Comcast.
In transcribing the minutes, staff inadvertently referred to comments
expressed by Mr. Chernau as those of Mr. Dopp, therefore, staff
requests the Board amend the minutes as follows:
Preparer:
~~'1!1..\-fJl~~ts
Title:Clerk to the Board of
Supervlsors
1#
Attachments:
DYes
. No
at',
-
-
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Page 2- 0l.2.
Summary of Information: (Continued)
FROM:
"Mr. Mike Chernau, Assistant County Attorney I stated this date
and time has been advertised for a public hearing to consider
granting Chesterfield Cablevision, Incorporated a renewal of its
cable television franchise and to adopt amendments to Chapter 7
of the County Code related to providing cable television services
in the County. He further stated staff has negotiated an
agreement with Comcast which will provide the County with the
most powerful cable system in the Richmond metropolitan area and
greater broadcast potential than any system in the region and
briefly reviewed the agreement. He then introduced Mr. Charles
"Buck" Dopp, General Manager of Comcast.
Mr. Dopp stated in exchange for a 15-year renewal with
Comcast, Comcast will upgrade its system to 750 mhz or 100
channel capacity within three years; provide expanded
governmental, educational, and public access channels; provide a
Public Safety Channel and equip the new Public Safety Training
Center with the capability of broadcasting training material over
the subscriber network to remote locations; construct a return
line from Manchester High School and provide equipment to allow
production and broadcasting of educational programs over the
subscriber network; connect the new James River High School and
Fire Station Number 15 with basic service at no cost; and
purchase a teleprompter for its studio on Ironbridge Road. He
further stated Comcast has also agreed to provisions in the
amended ordinance which will strengthen guarantees of high
customer service standards; make line extensions easier and
quicker than under current requirements; and will require Comcast
to submit to performance reporting requirements and public
evaluations every two years. He stated if the County commits to
purchase the requisite terminal equipment and pay the rates
calculated, Comcast will commit to provide Institutional Network
(INET) services. He further stated Comcast's goal is to provide
a broad array of services that will allow customers to choose and
requested the Board to accept Comcast's franchise proposal."
TO:
"Mr. Mike Chernau, Assistant County Attorney, stated this date
and time has been advertised for a public hearing to consider
granting Chesterfield Cablevision, Incorporated a renewal of its
cable television franchise and to adopt amendments to Chapter 7
1#
I
-
-.
.~~.
- ~
",.
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Page .2- oU
Summary of Information: (Continued)
of the County Code related to providing cable television services
in the County. He further stated staff has negotiated an
agreement with Comcast which will provide the County with the
most powerful cable system in the Richmond metropolitan area and
greater broadcast potential than any system in the region and
briefly reviewed the agreement including Comcast providing
equipment to allow production and broadcasting of educational
programs over the subscriber network and purchasing a
teleprompter for its studio on Ironbridge Road. He then
introduced Mr. Charles "Buck" Dopp, General Manager of comcast.
Mr. Dopp stated in exchange for a 15-year renewal with Comcast,
Comcast will upgrade its system to 750 mhz or 110 channel
capacity within three years; provide expanded governmental,
educational, and public access channels; provide a Public Safety
Channel and equip the new Public Safety Training Center with the
capability of broadcasting training material over the subscriber
network to remote locations; construct a return line from
Manchester High School; and connect the new James River High
School and Fire station Number 15 with basic service at no cost.
He further stated Comcast has also agreed to provisions in the
amended ordinance which will strengthen guarantees of high
customer service standards; make line extensions easier and
quicker than under current requirements; and will require Comcast
to submit to performance reporting requirements and public
evaluations every two years. He stated if the County commits to
purchase the requisite terminal equipment and pay the rates
calculated, Comcast will commit to provide Institutional Network
(INET) services. He further stated Comcast's goal is to provide
a broad array of services that will allow customers to choose and
requested the Board to accept Comcast's franchise proposal."
I
1#
,- -
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page --L of --L
AGENDA
Meeting Date:
August 24, 1994
Item Number:
8.B.7.a.
Subject:
Set public hearing to consider the conveyance of a parcel in the Chesterfield Airport Industrial
Park and to authorize the County Administrator to renew an option agreement
County Administrator's Comments:
~ ~ ~ ~ L.,;& Ir ~ ~ft /1<iy
County Administrator: ~1'{>~. ~ L~C2-
Board Action Requested:
Staff recommends the Board of Supervisors set September 28, 1994 as the public hearing date to
consider the conveyance of a parcel and renewal of an option agreement for that parcel in the
Airport Industrial Park.
Summary of Information:
On February 9, 1994, the Board of Supervisors approved an option agreement with Childress
Klein Properties (CKP) for the conveyance of approximately 3,8 acres at the end of White Bark
Terrace. CKP is currently working with a prospect who has asked CKP to develop a proposal for
a 25,000 square foot office building. In order to position their proposal, CKP needs to verifY that
the land will be available, thus their request for the option.
CKP wishes to renew the option agreement for 6 months, while the prospect continues the admin-
istrative work necessary to facilitate the project If the option is exercised, the property will be
sold for $45,000 per acre.
AGI4AG13/jal
Preparer: ~~,;e>. ~;t..---
Title:
Director
Attachments: II Yes
D No
1#
078
-
-
White Bark Terrace Option Site
Property Description
All that certain tract or parcel of land containing approximately 3.8 acres, located in the Dale
Magisterial District of Chesterfield County, Virginia at the Chesterfield Airport Industrial Park,
which parcel fronts approximately 30 feet on the cul-de-sac of White Bark Terrace, and is bor-
dered on the northeast by property owned by the Chesterfield County Industrial Development
Authority, on the southeast by Johnson & Bloy Canada, Inc., on the southwest by Route 288, and
on the northwest by property owned by Dennis H. Owens and W.G. & H.J. Lindsey, and is shown
on the attached plat. Includes parcel 79-6 (3) 43 and the portion of 79-6 (3) 11 described above.
AGI4AG 13/jal
079
---- -- -- -_.:~ -------~........-.-----------_...._-~----- ------ -- ----
wJ~s ERN
RE RVE
PLA ICS
'eM
I
I
.,
JAMES
R.
NEWEL,
2/27/7!l c:i
2.0AC . a::
.)-
'0
1 z
I~
I~
I ~
, l!J
12M
REYNOLDS
METALS
CAN DIVISION SM
HEADQUARTERS
s"
- - - - - - - - - - - - --- -- -
MARSHALL JAMES M 8 J RICHIE R.W. ADAMS C.C
COLE, JR. K. ASSOCIATES 8 8 PROPI
RICHIE L.A. LEHMAN
12/28/72 COX 10/30/85 II/a
12/30/86 2.525 AC 2.52 AC 4/16;135 5/9/78 2.52 AC 2.2
3.00 AC 1.262A 2.526 AC
1262AC
15M
15"
16"
IS"
V.E. 8 P.
PACE
5/3/79
1.420A
8M
SKEANS
8
SKEANS
4/8/81
I. 04 Al
SEALEZE
12/Z8/84
Z.064AI
---'
---- .
--
--
--
--
--
--
-- 8
----- E. '2.8
_---------. 00 \J \'. ,
-- {'
--
--
--
---
6M
12"
ReA
PARTNERSHIP
3/19/84
1.805 AC
F 8 R
ENTERPRISES
5/17/74
1.43AC
MARSHALL W. COLE, JR.
8
M. B. CO L E
6/26/74 3.36AC
8"
/2"
FRITO - LAY
8/31/81
2.595 AC
L.P. LUCORD,JR.
3/10/87
2.81Z AC
CHESTERFIELD IDA
5 . 57 AC
/2"
Dennis H. Owens
2.6 AC
3.8 AC
.
STRAHAN
a LACQUER
CORP.
10/IZ/82
1.82AC
W.G. 8 H.J. LINDSAY
11/10/88
I. 946 AC
080
--
-
Meeting Date:
August 24, 1994
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Page ~of2
Item Number:
8.B.7.b.
Subject:
Set a Public Hearing for September to Consider an Amendment to the Lease between the County
and the Chesterfield County Fair Association, Inc. to extend the lease term from December 31,
1999 to December 31, 2009.
County Administrator's Comments:
~~~ ~~ lr~ ('r(/5C/y
CountyAdministrator: 7Juf~,(I~, F--.II;
BoardAction Re~uested:
Set a public hearing for September to consider an amendment to the lease between the
County and the Chesterfield County Fair Association, Inc.
Summary of Information:
On December 19, 1989 the County and the Chesterfield County Fair Association, Inc.
("Association") entered into a long term lease of the fairgrounds property. The current term of the
lease will not expire until December 31, 1999, but the Association has asked the County to extend
the term until 2009 so that it will run concurrently with the term of the lease recently granted by
the Board to the Central Virginia Model Railroaders.
The Association is willing to assist in the financing of the model railroad exhibition building,
but can only do so if the term of its lease expires at the same time as the model railroaders' lease.
Staff recommends setting a public hearing to consider approving the amendment to the
Association's lease extending the term to December 31, 2009.
Preparer:
County Attorney
1107:7164.1
1#
081.
I
Attachments:
DYes
. No
-
-
-
Meeting Date:
J\ugust 24, 1994
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Page 1-of..2...
Item Number:
8.B.7.c.
Subject:
Set a public hearing for September 14, 1994 to consider amendments to Chapter 19.1 of the
Code of the County of Chesterfield relating to regulation of taxicabs.
County Administrator's Comments:
~~. ~ ~ ~ M.r h~ t'( /ti"1
CountyAdmlnistrator: ~~ ~/H-
BoardAction Requested:
Set a public hearing for September 14, 1994.
Summary of Information:
Chesterfield, Richmond and Henrico have been asked by the Richmond Regional
Planning District Commission to adopt changes to the uniform taxicab ordinance recommended
by the Capital Regional Taxicab Advisory Board. The most significant change relates to the
age limitations for vehicles being used as taxicabs. The Taxicab Advisory Board has
determined that the present five (5) year age limitation on vehicles used as taxicabs is too
restrictive. Mter surveying other communities, the Taxicab J\dvisory Board recommends that
the ordinance be changed to state that no vehicle which is older than ten (10) model years
or which has greater than 300,000 miles shall be used as a taxicab. The Advisory Board
believes this new standard will better balance the concerns of the taxicab industry and safety
concerns of the public.
The other changes will (i) add additional safety related requirements for equipment in
each taxicab; (ii) strengthen enforcement provisions for violations of the ordinance; and (iii)
add Hanover County as a recognized reciprocal jurisdiction.
Preparer:
Attachments:
. Yes
D No
County Attorney
0607:7424.1(7431.1) I #
082
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Page 2... of.2.
Summary of Information: (Continued)
Staff recommends that a hearing be set for September 14, 1994 to consider the
proposed amendments.
1# 083
-
AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE CODE OF THE COUNTY
OF CHESTERFIELD, 1978, AS AMENDED, BY AMENDING
AND REENACTING SECTIONS 19.1-1, 19.1-3, 19.1-4, 19.1-5, 19.1-10,
19.1-14, 19.1-26, 19.1-30, 19.1-36, 19.1-37, 19.1-40 and 19.1-49
RELATING TO TAXICABS AND OTHER VEHICLES FOR fiRE
BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County:
(1) That Sections 19.1-1, 19.1-3, 19.1-4, 19.1-5, 19.1-10, 19.1-14, 19.1-26, 19.1-30,
19.1-36, 19.1-37, 19.1-40 and 19.1-49 of the Code of the County of Chesteifield. 1978, as
amended, is amended and reenacted to read as follows:
Sec. 19.1-1 Definitions.
For the purposes of this chapter, the following words and phrases shall have the
meanings respectively ascribed to them by this section:
000
For-hire car. for-hire vehicle. taxicab. Words used interchangeably meaning A~
passenger-carrying, self-propelled motor vehicle maintained for hire by the public and
operated upon the streets of the county in the transportation of passengers for
compensation, not operating on a regular route or between fixed terminals and having a
seating capacity of not more than six (6) passengers but excluding common carriers of
persons or property operating as public carriers under a certificate of public convenience
and necessity issued by the State Corporation Commission or under a franchise granted by
the county.
000
Taxicab. .f~ for hire passenger carrying, self propelled motor vehicle, not operating
on a regular route or between fixed terminals and having a seating eapa-city of not more
than six (6) passengers.
Sec. 19.1-3 Certificate of public convenience and necessity.
(a) Required. It shall be unlawful to operate or cause to be operated within the
county any for-hire car unless a certificate of public convenience and necessity has been
issued to the owner thereof by the chief of police covering the operation of such vehicle and
unless the conditions, regulations and restrictions set forth and prescribed in this chapter
have been complied with by such owner. An owner shall operate under only one certificate.
and +.1he certificate shall provide for the operation of a specified number of for-hire
vehicles~ aRd-i.It shall be unlawful to operate or cause to operate more vehicles than the
0603:7431.1
- 1 -
084
~
-
number provided in the certificate. Additional for-hire vehicles may be operated by a
certificate holder only upon written application on a form provided by the chief of police,
approval of such application, payment of fees provided hereunder and compliance with all
other provisions of this chapter.
000
(g) Minimum specifications for vehicles. It shall be unlawful for a certificate
holder to place into service a for-hire vehicle unless the vehicle is a four-door, hard top
vehicle and meets or exceeds the following minimum specifications:
1. Head room: Front thirty eight (38 inches, rear thirty eight (38) inches.
2. Leg room: Front forty one (41) inches, rear forty ORe (41) inches.
3. Shoulder room: Front fifty seven (57) inches, rear fifty seven (57) inches.
4. Hip room: Front fifty five (55) inches, rear fifty fhe (55) inches.
5. Entrance height: Front thirty fiye (35) inches, rear thirty fiTle (35) inches.
1. Wheel size: Fourteen (14) inches
6.2. +He Wheel base: One hundred six (106) inches.
3. Curb weight: 3400 lbs.
Official interior dimensions from the manufaeturer must be submitted to the ehief
of police by the certificate holder prior to plaeing any vehicle into serviee.
(h) Age and Mileage Limits of Vehicles Under Certificate: It shall be unlawful
for a certificate holder to place into service a for-hire vehicle which either is more than ffle
~ ten (10) model years old at the time it is placed into service; or which has more than
three hundred thousand (300.000) miles at the time it is placed into service. however, once
properly placed in service a vehicle may continue to be used as a for hire vehicle indefinitely
by the same certificate holder if such vehicle otherwise meets the requirements of this
chapter and if the certificate under which it is operated docs not lapse, is reneYNed annually,
and is oot revoked. Effective January 1. 1995. it shall be unlawful to operate any vehicle
for-hire which either is more than ten (10) model years old or which has more than three
hundred thousand (300.000) miles.
Sec. 19.1.4 Inspection of vehicles.
Every for.:hire vehicle eaf for which a certificate has been granted by the county shall
be inspected by the chief of police, or some member of the division of police designated by
him or such other reputable agency as the chief of police may prescribe, at regular intervals
of at least every twelve (12) months, and at such other times as the chief of police may
prescribe. If such vehicle shall be found to be in an unsafe, unfit or unclean condition, or
to have tom seats or upholstery or to have inoperable air conditioning or heating
equipment, the owner thereof shall be notified by the chief of police at once of such defect
and such vehicle shall not be operated thereafter until such defect has been remedied. If
0603:7431.1
- 2 -
085
upon inspection it is found that the odometer of a vehicle has been unlawfully tampered
with. the vehicle shall be permanently rejected for use as a for-hire vehicle.
Sec. 19.1-5 Assignment of color scheme, number. etc.. by chief of DoUce.
(a) There shall be displayed on every for-hire eaf vehicle lettering clearly showing
the name and number of the owner thereof and indicating that such vehicle is a for-hire car.
Taxicabs shall use only the words "taxi", "cab" or "taxicab" to indicate that such vehicle is a
for-hire car. The color scheme and the size, content and character of such lettering and the
position thereof on each such vehicle shall be assigned by the chief of police and no vehicle
shall be operated under the provisions of this chapter unless and until such assigned
specifications have been complied with. Taxicabs in serviee under a valid certificate on the
effective date of this pr<YRsion shall be brought into eomplianee ','lith all eolor and signage
specifications no later tban January 1, 1993. The failure of any owner to complete with such
assigned specifications also shall constitute a violation of this chapter.
000
10 If a vehicle is for any reason taken out of service as a vehicle for-hire on a
permanent basis. the owner of the vehicle shall within seventy-two (72) hours remove the
assigned decal along with all other indicia of the vehicle's use as a vehicle for-hire.
W.U:U It shall be unlawful to operate a vehicle which does not meet the
requirements of this section.
000
Sec. 19.1-10 Roof Ue:ht: failure. etc.. to use.
Each taxicab shall be equipped with a light prescribed by the chief of police mounted
to the roof of the taxicab which shall indicate to the public that the vehicle is or is not under
hire. The roof light shall be lit when the car is available to the public for hire. Rooflights
and meters shall operate by use of one switch only so that the light will automatically be lit
when the meter is not running. It shall be unlawful for a driver to fail, refuse or reflect
neglect to operate such roof light or to operate such light in a misleading manner. Such
light shall be inspected during such inspections provided in Section 19.1-4. Any taxicab
found to have a defective roof light shall not be operated as a for-hire car until such defect
is corrected.
000
Sec. 19.1-14 Limitation on number of llasseneers in front and rear seats.
0603:7431.1
- 3 -
086
It shall be unlawful for a driver to transport in a taxicab more than tv-.'{) (2)
passengers in the front scat Of more than four (4) passengers in the fear at the same time
the number of passengers for which the vehicle is equipped with operable seat belts that
have been lawfully installed which. in any event. shall not exceed six (6) passengers.
000
Sec. 19.1-26 Certificate holder to have telephone listine.
Every certificate holder shall provide and maintain at all times in the Greater
Richmond telephone directory a listed telephone in the name in which the certificate holder
is doing for-hiring business, by which calls may be made for for-hire service, which telephone
listing~ lif the certificate holder operates five (5) or more for-hire cars, the telephone listing
shall also appear in the Greater Richmond classified telephone directory. In the event there
has not yet been an opportunity to publish the listing in the required directories. the
telephone number shall be available from the Greater Richmond directory assistance
service.
000
Sec. 19.1-30 Record of calls to be kept.
(a) The owner and the drive of a for-hire car shall keep a "manifest", which shall
be a permanent record of the transportation of each passenger. Each manifest shall include:
000
ill The date and time each shift beings and ends.
000
Sec. 19.1-36 Revocation of permit.
Subject to the provisions of Section 19.1-42, the permit of any driver of a for-hire car
shall immediately become void and shall be immediately surrendered upon the occurrence
of any of the following:
000
All drivers and certificate holders shall notify the chief of police within fifteen (15)
days of the occurrence of any event enumerated in subsection (a). (b). (c). Cd). (e) or (i)
above.
0603:7431.1
- 4 -
087
-
Sec. 19.1-37 Issuance of Dermit after refusal: reissuance after revocation.
Except as provided in section 19.1-38 below, any person refused a driver's permit
under the provisions of Section 19.1-35 or whose driver's permit is revoked under the
provisions of Section 19.1-36 shall not be eligible for issuance of a new permit until such
time as the grounds for refusal of a permit under Section 19.1-35 no longer apply; provided,
however, that if a driver's permit is refused or revoked for knowingly making, or causing to
be made, either directly or indirectly, any false statement, or for making a charge above or
below the rates prescribed by Section 19.1-8, or a driver's permit is revoked under Section
19.1-36(d) or (e). such driver shall not be eligible until twelve (12) months from the date
of refusal or revocation.
000
Sec. 19.1-40 Revocation of certificate of Dublic convenience and necessity.
Subject to the provision of Section 19.1-42, the certificate of public convenience and
necessity shall immediately become void and shall be immediately surrendered upon the
occurrence of any of the following:
000
(b) The chief of police determines, after investigation, that the certificate holder
is in violation of Section 19.1-26, 19.1-30 or 19.1-31, and the certificate holder knowingly
fails to comply with such sections with thirty (30) fifteen (15) days after notification of such
violation;
000
Sec. 19.1-49 RecilJrocity.
Upon a find by the chief of police that the City of Richmond, Henrico County,
Hanover County and any county or city contiguous to Richmond~ eF Henrico County~
Hanover County or any of them has adopted an ordinance containing provisions comparable
to the county ordinance and providing for reciprocity with the county, then vehicles for
which a person holds a current and valid certificate of public convenience and necessity
issued by the City of Richmond, Hemico County, Hanover County any county or city
contiguous to Richmond~ eF Hemico CountY.. Hanover County or any of them and drivers
who hold a current and valid permit issued by the City of Richmond, Henrico County,
Hanover County any county or city contiguous to Richmond~ eF Hemico County. Hanover
County or any of them will be deemed to have complied with the certificate and or permits,
as the case may be, issued by the county which such city or county certificates or permit
issued by the City of Richmond, Henrico County, Hanover County any county or city
contiguous to Richmond~ eF Henrico County~ Hanover County or any of them will be
0603:7431.1
- 5 -
088
deemed to have complied with the certificate and permit requirements of this chapter and
shall be deemed to possess comparable certificates or permits, as the case may be, issued
by the county which such city or county certificates or permits issued by the City of
Richmond, Hemico County, Hanover County. any county or city contiguous to Richmond...
ffi' Henrico CountY.. Hanover County or any of them shall be valid in the county where the
holder of such certificate or permit has applied for and been refused a permit or certificate
by the county, or has had such permit or certificate revoked by the county under the
provisions of the chapter and is not eligible for issuance of a permit or certificate by the
county.
000
(2) That this ordinance shall become effective immediately upon adoption.
0603:7431.1 - 6 -
089
.-
-
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Page lof-L
Meeting Date:
August 24, 1994
Item Number:
8.B.8.a.
Subject:
Request for Permit to Stage Fireworks Display at the Southside Speedway on September 2,
1994
County Administrator's Comments:
~~
countyAdministrator:'~~ ~~-- .12 ,l1Jrf..
~~tI
BoardAction Requested:
Staff recommends that the Board approve this request subject to conditions required
by the Fire Department and the Fire Prevention Code.
Summary of Information:
International SportsjSouthside Speedway has requested permission from the Board of
Supervisors to stage a fireworks display at the Southside Speedway on September 2, 1994,
with a rain date of September 4, 1994. Southside Speedway has conducted similar displays
on the same property each year for at least the last four (4) years without incident.
Southside Speedway has obtained a liability insurance policy naming the County of
Chesterfield as an additional insured party in the amount of $1,000,000, which coverage has
been approved by Risk Management. Capt. David Creasy of the Fire Prevention Bureau
reviewed this fireworks request and indicated that it meets the criteria under the Fire
Prevention Code.
Preparer:
~~. I.uh~
:steven L. MIcas
Title:
County Attorney
1103:6780.4
I #
096
Attachments:
DYes
. No
"-
-
MAY-10-1994 13:28 FROM ~HESTERFIELD FIRE DEPT
5/92
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
HARRY G. DANIE.L. CHAIRMAN
0AlE OISTl'lICT
ARTHUR S. WARRel, VICE "CHAIRMAN
CLOVEF1 HIll. OfS'mlCT
J. L MCHAlE. III
BeI'lMUOA OISTRlC1'
WHALEY M. COLBERT
'-l"TOACA 0IS1'F11CT
EDWARD 6. 6AH1::lER
MIOLOTHtAN OISTRlCT
TO
3589880 P.01
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
P.O. Box 40
CHESTERFIELD, VIRGINIA 23832-0040
Application for Fireworks Display
(Print or Type All In~ormation)
LANE B. RAMSEY
COUNTY ^OMINIIOTA^TOI'1
July 5, 1994
Date of Applic~tionl
Event Name: Holiday 150 w/Fireworks
Dat~:
Sept 2, 1994
,
Rain Date:
9/30/94
Time of Fireworks: 10:30pm/llpm
.. 1
Southside Speedway
Event L"ocation:
Usual infield area of track.
(include map)
Sponsoring Organization: International Sports/Southside Speedway
..~ ~
Shooting site/Display area:
Joseph E. Baldacci, Jr.
Person In Charge of Event:
Mailing Address:
3200 W. Moore St.
city:
Work Phone:
Ri chmon d
State.
23230
Va.
Zip:
730-2851
358-9875
Home Phone:
'W.G. Bulifant III
Person Coordinating .!fireworks: Dominion Fireworks, Inc.
(for sponsor) Mailing Address: P.O. Box 3015
City: Petersburg
Work Phone: 804-733-6792
Va.
Zip: 23805
804-452-0595
State:
" Home Phone:
Compa.ny Responsible for Shooting: Dominion Fireworks
Mailing Address: Same as above
City: State: Zip:
Work Phone: After Hours:
Shooters Name Dominion Fireworks Staff TBA.
",,-_.'I'~
IUSHt-fo
~
:'!'
CJJ
U)"
c<\
I
...0
~
(j
~
~
~
~
'J
,~
~
~ :t~
()~ ~tt
x.J ffi '"
"~.,:::~
....... !~
...........1
TOPS 14
H'-'~- ;:;;-34 WED
l::S : 4;:;;
P.02
-
~UG-02-1994 15:45
...'Itlrfleld Ftr~ Fr~u.
1 804 768 8'766 P.B2/02
Note%
1. Attach a, 11$~ ,()f fJ.,x€lwo.;tk,s to b~ used in the display.
2. Atta.oh a copx :of "tne oe.~.t:ifioate of insurance.
3. Include asj..it.~ dra~'11n9 :noi;:ing discharge site, spectator viewing
area,. pat~j.ng,: and. any n:~a.lr'by st;r:uctures.
4. Should yo~ have any ~l~~tions, call the Fire Pravention Bureau
at 748...1426. '
'5. Retu~n appl~cation to:
Ch~s~: rf1e"lq. fite pr~vlifnti<m
P . o. ,Bo::.( -4 Q ,
Cheelterf1eld." VA 23832
Da te:. "P"" J: ~ 9L~ A1"p,li~Zj\l1t ' $
pr i~ll tiN fdrb~=
. -
.~~ ~~~~.
13,,~ '--C)A ~('_ I
"
kxx.xxx.xxx.x.X ~~~'-"f"'--"~"~~~,;v~~"'~"-~ -'-
, " .~~JOP9'J(~~~7,xXK.x~;XX.x.KXXXXXXXXXXXXJI.:xxxxXJqOOOOOOt
C'l..... ~~~ -~~ \ . \ ,,,; :(Qf.flo~ use only)
,:) ~6t'- r--.t;~~-ONS ..
-- Rem~s ;r-~~~ :,7i ..~ 9)~i~<.: :\~y,~~1'1w 0 ON .qJ.JA~~"+ r{?f:?,~'r ~~~.!l'f
~~~ 1l't:_~.~.~~,1t."::'l.:f~~..~tfL~....t1t!.,,q I n;t:wl....'q ALL v~~~
} .............~;::....'. I'," ,. ~, .
t~~~ A(ff~ "1ll:.-6t~-~<"t ~r,~~~~~;vd rnc1I1'M:f!ii v-ehv:(~,'
r~t2.0NIV.J: AIJI.d. .fJ.ft;~~#~4~'i~;.~t!QftL~~K..'2'.( 7il~tJ r;,f~.4 ~
ri'Jl~t.. ~-N4"~~i/~'4/f#.~~4tL~~.Ji!J';6f ,Ii. j!~ ..~ ·
~, Site suit,~,bJ:e'fO~' ~iS. :t?J.$.Y pending County Attorney and ':Soard.
of Supetvisor9'hpp~Qv~1.
Site un~uitab~e.
Event R~pres~nt~tiyez
, , ..,.',t
Data:.. 2's-<3 -9~.
p- .-:$ . 9J<-'
Fire
--
-
AGREEMENT fi ·
DOMINION FIREWORKS '~~..,
PETERSBURG, VIRGINIA ."J' :\~..
THIS AGREEMENT Made this 27th
day of
Apri 1
A.D., 19~, by and between
DOMINION FIREWORKS, Inc., Party of the First Part, and Southside Speedway
hereafter designated as the Party of the Second Part, providing for an exhibition of fireworks to be given at
Souths ide Speedway Located in Chesterfield Countv. Virginia
on the evening of September 2.1994 RAIN DATE 9/30 at Sauthside Spwy
designated by said party of the Second Part and approved by said party of the First Part.
In a location to be
The parties hereto mutually, agree, each with the other, as follows:
1. The said party of the First Part agrees to furnish an exhibition of fireworks substantially In accordance with pro-
gramme submitted, and the party of the First Part shall supply a sufficient number of personnel to execute the display.
2. The party of the Second Part agrees to furnish and set up rope lines for the protection of the public and agrees
to furnish ample pollee protection to the party of the First Part for the protection of Its property and the firing of exhibl.
tlon without Interference from the public, and agrees to procure any and all necessary permits and licenses which may
be required by any governmental agency. The party of the Second Part also agrees to furnish lumber, If needed, to erect
display.
3. The party of the Second Part agrees to pay the party of the First Part, or his order, the sum of
$3,000.00 DOLLARS. The party of the Second Part Is responsible for any governmental taxes. The se-
cond party agrees to pay a 15% deposit of the contracted price.
4. Party of the (First) (Second) Part to furnish Public Liability and property damage Insurance of $1,000,000 C.S.L.
Minimum, naming party of (First) (Second) as additional Insured.
5. Ralnouts will be charged at 15% of the contracted price. Cancellations without a rain date will be charged at 25%
of the contracted price.
6. Both parties agree that the distance from the firing site will comply with all National Fire Prevention Association
Standards (N.F.P.A. Section 11.23) and any local law that may be different.
7. The party of the second party agrees to provide a fire truck and trained firefighters to be present when the fireworks
are fired.
8. The balance of the contracted price will be paid the night of the display, terms will be cash or cashiers check
made payable to Dominion Fireworks, Inc.
9. The second party agrees to furnish one (1) adult eighteen years old or older for every 100 feet radius of the firing
site, to keep restricted area secure.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF:
DOMINION FIREWORKS, INC.
By r//./7, 7?/./~4L ///
Date April 27,1994 -
INI'ERNATIONAL SPORTS, me. t/ a Sauthside Spwy
-,
By
, ate
--&/""l_ / ~ _ ~
l..UI''t I J.1'tUt:. rl'.'-'I' I ,'c....." ...--- . . ......-
---.,.... .~ """"utns"'A_'~" '.' '"
. -. . - -. "". . .. :~,. 1 TT~ "^'" ~ ...,~~. . . t '
. . . .3 International' S. ts, InC~" .[
.' e:Bltj~Ry'_""tJ~EB~QE . '. E~CEaS_CO~EIH~ue; , . --,...-.--_..____.~-.-..--
CO'MF'AN Y; I....U...E L_l.DiAAr.. .nt.ELC.Q~ :""~_ __.~-~_'":"~------_.':"- .:..... -..--:.. -.. -....-.---.-..-.---
-----~r~~.~X~------- ---~---------------- --~----------------.
PO LICY NUt; E:e:R~ T' _ _..,__ :S...IilZ i;l:"'~~_'H_ .----- -, -;-,~ -:... --'-- -- .--'---- -.,... - -.- ....- -- --.....-...- -.".-- -..-
LI AF!L ITY LIMI l. ' .' ' . '.'. ..'. ' .... .
I1I/F-'D Occu no. IOtnc. t _....t1...QQ~h.~. Q~Ca.L!-_~ ,--":".i---.:..:..,.------.~~--_r. .-.-:-1----.--- -.._.._.___.!_..
A99re;atel __.l...Qo.O~.QQO-__tL_- . " .' .' . ) "
. '.' '.' Ex~e~G of' .' _ El(c~~,; of
, -~_._~~~---~~--~~~--.--~!--------~---~--
C L j3SS It F'r ad uc t. . . .;._....i_...~-:-_:__~___.Li::...__~ ..--.t-ll~.- ...--.-.,..- -..."'.----.-
POLICY F'E~~~~l' .' ',7/1:5/114 . .' 0/00/00 . 0/00/00
Tot 7/1:1/'10 . . :..' " '.:O/O,~/OO" 0/00/00.
, " .' . ' . ." It .~. COM1HNED SlNOl.'E LIMIT
Itn 'IMe eVG:nt of any mc1'te,~'I.iL chan9Q In, or- cancelLation of said pollcy(ll2s),
Ithe Company will endeavor to give wrltt.n n~tlce to1he ~.rty wh~m this cer-
Itlficate Is Issuod,. but f.tllur'e,'to glvGP such no.'tIce sh.jlLL Impose no ti.3blllty
lor otlllgc1tlon upon it". Company. ;', . " .
j NAM~ & ntlllRESS OF CIERtIFl.CAT.E. t10~DER: .... DATE OF DISpLAY: 6!P.t~.~,1994 or9/30 !
; ~-""hsu- ~_u ." ..'. " RAIN DA'tE* . 9/30/..9.4_____, '
I;)VU'- ..LUltl ..,~n....r . " ..." " ..DISPLAY AMOUNT:" , .
I P.O.Box 9156 . , l;-OCAT JON OF D ISF>LA:'" l Sout:hs~ Speedway located
I R.ic:h'rrm,' Virginia 23227 in Chesterfield county, Virginia
lIt Is a cDndltlon of th~poLlcY,1h<lt all dl~plliYS be! rfiPorted 10 'Hle Company at
!.e"~5t 24 hours In adv.ance of the dIsplay data.' . . . ,.'
jThls eer.tif Icatlf neither affll"m.atlvely no,- nega'tI'veLy amends'! &jetends or alters
i the o:::ovel-age ..f10~ded by.th& polJcy(Je~) .deipcV"lbed'he,-son. NolEt In tho) event
'1' that rain or Imclement wQ~thGr. prohlblt& thl$.dlspl~Yr' t6V9rage wrLl apply
on Oil sUb$l?'1.U{;fnt dale on which .1he dlmpta)' fs heldt, w(Thln HHit'ttnr.s 01 the
iPollcY cQntract~ CLeanupand.~ollclh9 ~f.t~e:'dlsp dy.re,th~_re'pon~lbl llty ,
lot .the sponso'-IB.' '. ". . .' . .' ." , . , !
ITh~ fol towl Og' ar~ addltJonaL Ins~rQd$~ ,anY.falr. orexhlbltlon,' ~~soclatlon
'5Pon~or lu9 organlz~tlon or committeE,' the "bWner Qf lessee uf any premises used
(bY H!e Named InGUriild, Or: any public iuthorlty'gr<lintlng a permlt:to the Nam~d
i Insu~ed, but only a~ respects Icc.ldents arlsln9 outof ne~lIgenc~.of th~. .
I Ndmt.1rJ Insured or th~ Named-~d'~ emp~oyees'actl..f\l3' 1.1'1 the com-sa ~nd scope
lof their enlp\oYlftQnt. ALso! a~ .additionaL Named 'Insun~d, any Ir)d~pe"dll1it Con-'
I tractor who fl\-,'i:..'the display 0" beb.alf of. 'the 'Named Insured. 'fryls Insurance
IdOf.?!;; Tlot 'appLy to .any fAI.tun., 'to pollee or c,'oanup- the display, or lIC1blLl'ty
i a r I 5 I n~ the nl . 1 '" 0 m , '.. . '. . . , . . . .' ;
! Thls,ce,-tlflc~t, 'I..-.not v.alld ':1nLe'is an or.lglnal sl~.n..l~u,-e app~ars b~low.
( COP J es Not V", ,l. I d ). " . ' ,. J '. ....', ',' , . .
I' .. . . '. . . . ..' . . ." .
I CoV(:~rdge undl;Y' th9 pollC;y I. cOlldl.tloned upon full compLlianee by alL Insur'eds
wi \h d II applicable Natltonal Fire Protectlo AssocIation' FPA) codes and
I st(~ndal-ds In reffG-ct at ~the ,.tlme ,of t.he::dl~p .~y_..'.', "."' :...' .
I ~- t..:.-- ~J~Del.'2:!..._1'-?~lf"h'----'--';"':" " - -- '" --'r~i ._!~
; lJd e OT ~e\-dflcate H.6uance or zee natul" . "
j . ',. ..., .
I
!
.. .
'. .
. ;
L_._
A . ALLIED SPECIALTY INSURANCE, INC. .
) " ..
.
.
-
..........
TO: Capt. Dave Creasey
FRo1: Ibninion Fi..r'e\oJOrks
DATE: August 111994
MESSAGE: Certificate of insurance for SOuthside Speedway firework
display Sept. 2,1994. Also shell count and size to be fired .
AJso I will rreet with owner in the rrorning at 9:00 A.M.
Aug. 02 at the main gate to decide on a better location.
If posible, could you please rreet with us?, if not I will give you
a CRJJ. i
I
I
I
Shell Count
Shell Size
80
3 inch only
? ~ g:':':-""' ~'7 h h'''': , '~-'. .,"" or, ..... 'I ",r ~ " 'r. '
, ' , , , ' \' '" .'..,' , "
" ALLIED'"SPEctAL TY INSURANCE. ,'INC." ,\
" ,104:5 1 Ou L l' B O'JJ Lev.nd '.., ,
' Treat.ur&, Is.LandiFL 33706' '"
Toll 'reg 1-800-237-3355 N~tlonaL
1-~OO-2a2-6776 Florida .
't
, .
~''-'--I
',Cert,lf 'c,at@ Numbor': 00005
I , ,
CE~TIFlhA':E OF INSURANCE' " , ' '.
("" " FIREt.lORKa D.tSF-LAY,' ','
NAME &' AtlPfU:SS OF ,INSURED
~?S~.N~~~. ~~~gwoRK~, I~~,.,'
Pet~r~bur9~ VA 23~05', -
, \ " ,
, " ~J)D IT IONAL' INSURE 1'1 ,
11 COunty of. Cheetm-:f:leld, Virg.1n:1a
12 Southside' Speedway,',. ! , ~ '
'3 InteI'1'U!ltional SpOrts, lne~ '
. ~ EX'C[gg COUr:I<Ailt:' '
, ,
" E:Rll~h~fiX_CQ~EB:tM]E
I
,i
!
-
-
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Page ~ ofJ:....
Meeting Date:
August 24, 1994
Item Number:
8.B.B.b.
Subject:
Request for Permit to Stage Fireworks Display at the Woodlake Pavilion/Amphitheatre on
September 4, 1994
County Administrator's Comments:
~~
County Administrator: ~....f I ~ {L,- ~
t/
BoardAction Requested:
Staff recommends that the Board approve this request subject to conditions required
by the Fire Department and the Fire Prevention Code.
Summary of Information:
The Woodlake Community Association has requested permission from the Board of
Supervisors to stage a fireworks display at the Woodlake Pavilion/Amphitheater in Woodlake
on September 4, 1994, with a rain date of September 5, 1994. The Woodlake Community
Association has conducted similar displays on the same property each year for at least the
last five (5) years without incident. The Woodlake Community Association has obtained a
liability insurance policy naming the County of Chesterfield as an additional insured party in
the amount of $1,000,000, which coverage has been approved by Risk Management. Capt.
David Creasy of the Fire Prevention Bureau reviewed this fireworks request and indicated
that it meets the criteria under the Fire Prevention Code.
Preparer: B
Title:
County Attorney
1103:6780.5
I #
097
Attachments:
DYes
.
No
_.
-
::J/92
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
HARRY G. DANIEL, CHAIRMAN
DALE DISTRICT
ARTHUR S. WARREN, VICE CHAIRMAN
CLOVER HILL DISTRICT
J. L MCHALE, III
BERMUDA DISTRICT
WHALEY M. COLBERT
MATOACA DISTRICT
EDWARD B. BARBER
MIDLOTHIAN DISTRICT
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
P.O. Box 40
CHESTERFIELD, VIRGINIA 23832-0040
=~El.iJ-C'
~~ o.~
c.> ,.t,
I~...)
~,~U/
.J:'~~~
Application for Fireworks Display
(Print or Type All Information)
LANE B. RAMSEY
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
Date of APPlication:Ot:) III vNi ~ . SwvM-<-l
Event Name:JtjCY\NMr ro",~,~c, ~~~ Dat;! ~L-f ,[1'i'-{
~,'45ffV'- R~in DJ: 5ff(,~ /9CN
--1f~lM-.f:" 4\"lIjoJ/~ r.--
Shooting site /Disp lay area: --\" re, '" eLl ~~bh+ BJ\lfd...t of'JJo""'II~'" '\ itti.>>rt.s
(1.nCIU~ map) ~. ()a\M C~as~ ~.tI\.
Sponsoring Organization :~Cr)()/~~ ~ jf.Jjf\b t Ci\~ ~ n;~~\
. . s~odA ,O"'-J w.e~'\1)
~~OJllS
Time of Fireworks:
Event Location:
Mailing Address: \
Ci ty: ~r A {CJiV,f a '\
.
Work Phone:~
State:
Zip: d3[(a-
Home Phone :7~ '1 - 9g~
~
~~l'deJo~
"-
Person In Charge of Event:
Person Coordinating Fireworks: tSuho~ ~~~
( for sponsor) M~ilin'f\A~dress: JJ0 lBoX' S, 15
CHy: i:i~~ State: Q4-
Work Phone: Home Phone:
l'
\S\^"t \
Zip: d._:sBo5
73-'- C?1J- rr fJU6~~S\(P
Company Responsible for Shooting:
Mailing Address:
City:
State:
Zip:
Work Phone:
After Hours:
Shooters Name
-
-
Attach a
used in the display.
Attach a copy of the certificate of insurance. - Bltbhl\ -b- ~tef> tfff'-fo
~VL.
Include a site drawing noting discharge site, spectator viewing CfRQS~1
area, parking and any nearby structures. C~~
Should you have any questions, call the Fire Prevention Bureau' ff're~\I"
at 748-1426.
Al~ '-RflWot~5Sl\ct\0;\i1 k
~ 3 "sWl5, iACll(J.~ -R(\~JL,
list of fireworks to be
Note:
l.
2.
3.
4.
5. Return application to:
Chesterfield Fire Prevention
P.O. Box 40
Chesterfield, VA 23832
Print Name:
Date~ #,!Ht/
Applicant's
Remarks:
,..-- .
~~te suitable for display pending County Attorney and Board
of Supervisors Approval.
Fire
Date:
.7-:J9-fY
Site unsuitable.
Event Representative:
Dat,e:
07/28/94 15:07 ~8e47395157
,-
w. C. A.
@l:1\?l
-
WOODLAKE COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION
14900 Lake Bluff Parkway · Midlothian. VA 23112
~: ~ I ~1 &gl (qqi
-r;: ~VL C~aJ1/~~~
~. ~ McJq~Jk<- ~ . . - l~tF..
n \J -~ JPINi\Ill'-S
i(t;: List-~BRuJarl81 wI f;'~
'--- JpMJ PJldrJ
r
". S~ ~/ZQ.. F ~ ~W(jt~' -IP.EW:J~
. ~ k S;~* 01\ +~V'L~ I 1111
\0, \\ Qtl k "3 ,'I\(J .sWts-
ctfPY'aJirvvJcl1 I So ~MI s %1.
-u; sko~ w;1\ (q~t ~d- {d.-IS fY\}l\k .
g~gl~ se.~J .Gkoti8~
(804) 789-4344 · FAX (804.) 739-5157
MElIIBI!;R COMMUNITIC ABSOCI^TIONS INSTITI J'TF.
-----~~^---~.._,-----_._--_._---_. -
I
I
- -
ALLIr SPECIALTY INSURANCE, INC.
10451 Gulf Boulevard
Tn:~.as un? Is l.a nd t FL 33706
Tol.L Free 1-800-237-3355 National.
1-800-282-6776 FLorida
Certificate Number; 00004
CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE
FIREWORKS DISPLAY
NAME & ADDRESS OF INSURED
DOMINION FIREWORKS, INC.
P.O. Box 3015
Petersburg, VA 23805
fR 1M AR 'i.,.~ CO !lie: RA GE
CO MPAN n I.t.t.:! it: .t.~" In Sl:U r.a Dc:. e.." en ,I.
PO LICY NUM BER: :::: =~~:':::::~.1L: G2 :!2Q~',r:.= :::::: :~~ ~=
LI ABIL ITY LIMIT;
BI/PD Occurrence: __~1&QQQLQQQCaL~___
Aggregate: __~liQQQigQQ---~---
CLass B F'\~ od uc ts
PO L:rCY PER IOD:
Fl~om;
To;
$
7/15/94
7/15/9:1
ADDITIONAL INSURED
#1 Chesterfield County, Virgmia
#2 Woodlake Carmunity Association
#3 Mr. Frank Hancock, The Lakes on 360, Inc.
E~ CE SS _C O~ER AGe:
-..------------------
"-_._---_._~---~~--------
-.- .......... ............ ..-- ......... -....... --...... ..................... ....-- ....
M_,_._,__"M_"__'~~_-""'_______
-~.....-"------_.---_._---
---~------------~--- ---~-----------_!_-
Excess of Excess of
___I____________!___ ___I____________!-_
___~________________ ___1____-_---------
0/00/00
0/00/00
0/00/00
0/00/00
* - COMBINED SINGLE LIMIT
In the l~vent of an}I m.aterial chang~~ int 0\" cancellation of said policy(ies),
the rompany wilL endeavor to give written notice tothe party whom this cer-
tificate I'!',; issuedr but fal lUl"e to giv(o? such notice sh..lI.l impose 110 liabi tity
() l~ () b I. i 9 a"\' ion up 0 nth e Co mp any.
NAME ~ ADDRESS OF CERTIFICATE HOLDER; DATE OF DISPLAY; _~pt~I 4,1994
RAIN DATE: ..september 5,1994
Woodlake Corrmunity Association LaC AT ION 8~ Sb ~~ ~L ~~?U NT: $
1~900 L~ Bluff Parkway On the waterfront on the property of Mr. Frank Hancock
I~l~::~t~lc~~~{n~~.t i2;*1~)'r the po L I cy ~~ate~ tip 1i~pC?lro~ t?~ )~~5T.\fj&1~,o Vffl e Company at
I.e-as'\: 24 hOUi"S in advance of the dispLay elate.
This certificate neither affirmativeLy nor negativeLy amendsr extends or alters
the cOVel"age affoi"ded by the poticy(ies) deSC1"ib(?d hel"(eon. NOTE: In the event
that r-a in or imclement weather prohibits this display, coverage wilL applY
on a subse~uent date on which the display is heLd, within the terms of the
policY conti"act. CI.(;)<itnllp and pOlicing of the displ.ay ai"e the n.?sponsibiLity
of the sponsors.
Ttle fo I. lOl.>i i ng al"e iHI(j it i 0 \"fa L i nsun~ds; any f..~ i i~ t or"€-xh i bit ion, i:\SSOC i at i (} n
!::.pOTl';Oi" in9 organi z<':lti on or committee, the owner (H 1.~?sse(-2 of any Pi"emises used
by the Naflif."ld InSUi"ecl, or any pubLic au.tho)"ity (.H'anting a penfllt to thf? Named
Insu.d?dt but Ofll.y as l"espec'ts accidenh:, ar'ising outo-f nE~gligence of the
Named Insured or the Named Insured's emptoyees acting in the course and scope
of their' employmellt. Also, as ddditional Named Insuni'd, any Independant Con-
tractor who fires the dispLay on behalf of the Named Insured. This insurance
does:. not .:IPply to any fal lt1)~e to polic(-? Oi" cleanup the displ.aYt Oi" liability
arising there from.
Th is certificate is not valid unLess an oi"iginal signature appears below.
(Copi es Not Val iel)
COVe.~I~.ag(~ under th(~ poLicy is conditioned upon full compli neE- by all. insul-eds
wi th i:\ 1.1. applicabl.e National Fii~e Pi"otectioTI Assoc:iation NFF'A) codes and
st""dards in effect .1' the time of the di-pbay, ~
Da F0'-() fj~t.,!~tr:f1'c:r(~!it~;sua.nce.".-"-' Au'thoi:Tie<r S i g~.f~~
/\
~" ALLIED SPECIALTY INSURANCE, INC.
07/28/94 15:07
'lt8047395157
W. C. A.
@002
-
AGREEMENT
DOMINION FIREWORKS
PETERSBURG, VIRGINIA
THIS AGREEMENT Made this
25!Q.
day of
,"luly
A.D., 19-9.L, by and between
DOMINION FIREWORKS, Inc., Party of the First Part, and Wocxllake Ccmnunitv Association
Chesterfield Comtv. Virginia
hereafter designated as the Party ot the Second Part, providing for an exhibition of fireworks to be given at
'!'he Lake at Woodlake on t~ oropertv of Mr. Frank H:mC".DC"...k:
on the evening of Seotenber 4,1994 RAIN DATE September 5.1994
designated by said party of the Second Part and approved by said party of the First Part.
in a location to be
The parties hereto mutually, agree, each with the other. as follows:
1. The said party of the FIrst Part agrees to furnish an exhibition of fireworks substantially In accordance with pro.
gramme submitted, and the party of the First Part shall supply a sufficient number of personnel to execute the display.
2. The party of the Second Part agrees to furnish and set up rope lines for the protection of the public and agrees
to furnish amp'e pollee protection to the party of the First Part for the protection of Its property and the firing of exhibi-
tion without interference from the public, and agrees to procure any and all necessary permits and licenses which may
be required by any governmental agency. The party of the Second Part also agrees to furnish lumber. If needed, to erect
display.
3. The party of the Second Part agrees to pay the party of the First Part, or his order. the sum of
~ 00 DOLLARS. The party of the Second Part Is responsible for eny governmental taxes. ~
~~-
4. Party of the (First) (Second) Part to furnish Public Liability and property damage Insurance of $1,000,000 C.S.L.
Minimum, naming party of (First) (Second) as additional Insured.
5. Rainouts will be charged at 15% of the contracted prIce. Cancelletlons without a rain date will be charged at 25%
of the contracted price.
6. Both parties agree that the distance from the firing site will comply with all National Fire Prevention Association
Standards (N.F.P.A. Section 11.23) and any local law that may be different.
7. The party of the second party agrees to provide a fire truck and trained firefighters to be preaent when the fireworks
are fl red.
8. The balance of the contracted price will be paid the night of the display. terms will be cash or cashiers check
made payable to Dominion Fireworks, Inc.
9. The second party agrees to furnish one (1) adult eighteen years old or older for every '00 feet radius of the firing
site, to keep restricted area secure.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF:
DOMINION FIREWORKS, INC.
By W. fl. J3d~:aL-
Date JlllY 25,1994
By
Date
CB EXEC.I2ROP.
CB EXEC,PRQP,
VI~4.0~'''''''' 4-V.".
TEL No.
TEL -.!o .
U 1,1\;1'1'';' .:J I
N. I.. ....
Jul 22,04 15:18 No.013 P.02
J u J-? 2 I 04 1 4 : 30 No,. 009 P. 02 .
ItJ V\)~
W:OOD~~ CO~rx..ASSQClAIlQN
14g00 we Bluff Park wit}' .. Midlothian. VA 23112
July 21, 3 ~94
pa,o.....1(, /.J..4..Nc oC,J(. ( ~ ~ 11:1 '.J :1~" Su",'"
CJ ~t."LV'~ #Y~J"J " . .
7. "g Ylf~.r , ~lIV (owners oC Hull SllCCt'Ro.d Pro""rty ore Swift Creek Reo.rvlllt)
C/o Phil Blythe.
Coldwell Banker Executive Pro~nies
1500 Huguenot Road, Sulle. 104
Midlothlan, VA 23113
. , Dear C \o..lA..rt,,,,,, t/
. -
(owners or Hull Street Road Property orf Swill Creek RtSCNCljr),
This letter Is to confirm )'Our ~pproval for Domlni(,''ln FIreworks lo diflcharge fi~work.c;
from your propeny . spcclncally off ~ dirt road neate-Sl to the walerfroul, across the Jake
from the WOOdlake Pavilion/Amphitheater ar~. Thi~ would talee plllee on Sunday,
September 4, 1994 belween the h()u~ or 7pm Hod 1 Open, Shoul~ there. be fain on that
Sunday, Dominion Fir~work! wnuld U$~ lhfLt propeuy on the fullowing US;" Montla)\
September 5, 1994 between the hours of 7pm Ilncf lOpm.
DomInion PjreWork.~ will be flamIng the WoodJake Community Assochtlion Gnd YClurseJf,
'f~tA'tIAI '" ~ u .:t:~ _ In il$ Certfflcl\te of Insurance.
PJl;oele slga below LO indicate your approval, .and return thi" to our omc.:e ASAJI'. The
WoodlAke Commutlity MsoehUion Is hx:.ated at 14900 Lak~ Blufr PQrKwJlY, Midlothlan,
VA 23112. Our ttJephone numoor is 739-4344 and OUt FAX 1/ is 739.5157.
Many thanks for eVerything, and we hnpe to relum (he favor in tho ni!lilt futur~.
A CC4fflC"l a Lf ·
I
Co()rdicator
D,n-: ~ 1/1-"fr1.
~
(SO,,) 739.4344 . FAX (BO~' 739.t'ilI\7
..r"
"".'
//
-
/
r
~
I
~
r
,;""
A
~~o
'\
~-,
I
I
~/
. ~ /
'Vi
tv
~
/
\~~ //
. ~\J /
(). 09<Q Gf:. <.,//
I, ~/fl.. _//'::"--'~f(!!,
\ .' ..' 'II
\ .
.,. ~ -- '.."..~~ ,~~._..,""'~ , ',', . -
~1lI
.""-_....:'~.."'...' """ ......
'.- . rIiSL
.... -""-"'.,.y
c p LJ.-'Oo.-; w ~
"---- -,,' .
~ ~f>.\:vt- __
A(I\P~\/
~L,_,_-
,.............
--
.---
-'-'
.' ----.'IV
/~'/eT) ~ 7f'
/ 0 ~') / ./
..W{ /6' /
/// 'Y0001Xf/,kE
/,,-- / 99<;
~
~
ct
....j
e
Q~
()~
f""'\ ~~
,~~~
., .. .; I ~ .. .1
...
-
~~
...
14 ~
114
r>4 Q., .
~ ~~
CJ Q~ f-..
~ ~tt :t
1>1 ~~ ~ lu '\',
... (fJ 'I)
it: 4L ?>--: .:;)
CO ~l: >- -::t 1
. ~~~ ~
~~ J 'j
<t 0
~~~ }
\~
/7
IJ
o
.~~
~~
\~
C>.-
0;1,
\
\
\
\,
'.
G
"'\,'\.
\
\
\
,
\
-
CHESTERFIELD COUNT~
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Page .2.- of2-
Meeting Date: lJll]llst 24, 1994
Item Number:
8.B.9.
Subject:
State Road Acceptance
County Administrator's Comments:
CountyAdministrator: ~~ f-~
BoardAction Requested:
Summary of Information:
BERMUDA:
Cameron Hills, Section E
Hartland and a Portion of Preston Place, Section 1
DALE:
Holly Trace, Section C
Meadowbrook Farm, Section D and a Portion of Rock Spring Farms,
Section B
MATOACA:
Village Square Parkway, Phase I
Village Square Parkway, Phase II
Preparer:
Title:
Director
Environmental Engineering
Attachments:
. Yes
D No
1#
098
-
.
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Summary of Information: (Continued)
MIDLOTHIAN:
Salisbury Michaux, Section B
Salisbury Michaux, Section C
I
,
j
I
Page -L oU I
I
I
i
,
1#
099 ./
.....
TO: Board of Supervisors
FROM: Environmental Engineering
SUBJECT: State Road Acceptance - Cameron Hills, Section E
MEETING DATE: August 24, 1994
Okwna Drive
Cameron Hills Section E
/'
-
-----:~
('
i
\
'\
\/1
:J
i
~
,
i
Vicinity Map Scale 1 "=2000'
1.00
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
MEETING DATE:
-
Board of Supervisors
Environmental Engineering
-
State Road Acceptance - Hartland and a Portion of
Preston Place, Section 1
August 24, 1994
Burnettedale Drive
Burnettedale Court
Hartland and a portion of
Preston Place Section 1
y
/1
_..s:.s:rif,.t!'
,/
"i/~"A'~"; ~;1"'G
"'\
-e~,p
/'C/N/TY ,-5.<.e/;:';""" ...
/"" ~ .c?~<:11
Vicinity Map Scale 1"=2000'
101.
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
-
Board of Supervisors
Environmental Engineering
-
MEETING DATE:
August 24, 1994
State Road Acceptance - Holy Trace, Section C
Holly Trace Court
Husting Terrace
Husting Road
Oldbern Road
Brenspark Road
Oldbern Court
Holly Trace, Section C
THOU4E
...,
...
.:J
,
51'
102
-
TO: Board of Supervisors
FROM: Environmental Engineering
SUBJECT: State Road Acceptance - Meadowbrook Farm, Section D and
a Portion of Rock Spring Farms,
Section B
MEETING DATE: August 24, 1994
Melbeck Road
Country Manor Lane
Melbeck Circle
Meadowbrook Farm Sec.C and a
portion of Rock Spring Farms. Sec.B
,eoad
Ccx;Jbill
V/G/N fTY McjP
:x:o.t: /"cCCO'
Vicinity Map Scale 1 "=2000'
103
-
-
TO: Board of Supervisors
FROM: Environmental Engineering
SUBJECT: State Road Acceptance - Village Square Parkway,
Phase I
MEETING DATE: August 24, 1994
Village Square Parkway
Village Sq uare Parkway Phase I
U. S. pout. ,JIJO
r;..J srr-I RotId
'-
Vicinity Map Scale 1 "=1000'
104
-
-
TO: Board of Supervisors
FROM: Environmental Engineering
SUBJECT: State Road Acceptance - Village Square Parkway,
Phase II
MEETING DATE: August 24, 1994
Village Square Parkway
Village Square Parkway Phase II
,...~\.J... (l
:,. (\.-' N..\
, "'y .~I,J'
r:r ~~
t.C-;
~../
/).5. /?oule .}eO
HvJl StlW"l R(1tIIi
Vicinity Map Scale 1 "=1000'
105
.'-"
~>
TO: Board of Supervisors
FROM: Environmental Engineering
SUBJECT: State Road Acceptance - Salisbury Michaux,
Section B
MEETING DATE: August 24, 1994
West Salisbury Road
Christendom Court
Gildenborough Drive
Gamelaw Court
Domfront Court
Salisbury Michaux Section "B"
.:....
'. ".",
. 'j. c.
. '.'
.' a
'.f"
.. ... li. .,.
tj..
.... '.. .
.,
;
. TURNPIKE
'<':'}i
Vicinity Map Scale 1 "=2000'
lOG
-
-
TO: Board of Supervisors
FROM: Environmental Engineering
SUBJECT: State Road Acceptance - Salisbury Michaux,
Section C
MEETING DATE: August 24, 1994
J
0-
J
Newgate Road
Ethelred Court
Salisbury Michaux Section "e"
f
SAL./SBURY
J,//CHAUX "c"
U.5. R7E. 50
Vicinity Map Scale 1 "=2000'
107
~
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Page --1 of I
Meeting Date:
August 24. 1994
Item Number: 8.B.IO.a.
Su bject:
Award of Sanitary Sewer Contract Number 910141 for the
Construction of the Route 10/Landfill Drive Area Sewer
Assessment District Project.
County
Adm~~
Administrator. ~~~A(P r!1J12--
County
Board Action Requested:
Staff requests that the Board of Supervisors award the contract to T & E
Construction Co., Inc. in the amount of $243,824.25, appropriate
$100,000.00 from wastewater fund balance and authorize the County
Administrator to execute the necessary documents.
Summary of Information:
The Route la/Landfill Drive Area Sewer Assessment District is a sewer
extension project which will provide wastewater services to seven
properties along the west side of Route 10. Five responsive bids were
received ranging from $243,824.25 to $348,608.00. The low bid was
submitted by T & E Construction Co., Inc.. Funds were previously
appropriated for this project based on preliminary design. The cost of
easements and the low bid for construction exceeded estimates to
adequately fund this project and an additional appropriation of
$100,000.00 is requested.
Title:
Preparer. 6~ {~~
ary Beasley
Senior Enqineer
Attachments:
. Yes 'ONO
1#
108
. . .....
.;.}:o~; - ~ {'::t.'::nr/: .~ I. . _ l./ /. );( ;~.;:;: _
".v'," ~ "'..X' r ! ., ~" -. ~~ '. -iJ ,..
-'~' 'q):~'~f~~~l~;
'\ Cne"'ter"e'd /,,,.~ .'"'~~ "' .
4~S::: ~,_ - ",.~ ,1;:[ ~::~~~" I'i~:~~;;:; . ~~ {~!./
~~~ -;&"-"~' ?" J. ,
. ;~: ~:q~~,.,. ::i.:~' ..... ~~\ ' .
C 'I.. ~~.:.;:~.........~ \. I'
. ~--~ ~ ,c.~ :~ :','";'
~f '- ' .;-J
. .J. ~/~-- 11 \ ;~.:.-:..::......
I ~ -. "'- "-~_'_n "
. \ : -: ~~ -- . -- :- . . ~ !4~~
/0" '';\J~'::e~''': r:';~ ~--:
, . ,~:::;.~,. :~ // '.-:-:;::.
~J~. ~ ; r):J ~ .~
" . .y. . . ~~')'sl7~iY ;~fL
'?~<. r.="-0'.' I "'. -,-~.."
- , i ,'=""----.; "';':, j ~ ( ''':-''
.,;/' ............... ". \ ' " .:;.." /"...--""
/ '" ~, \ \~
.. ''------<::. "- \ \ i . , .
"~I (".. ( Cc "- -;Y - 'i-); #~~ ~..~.:. .
, '~-.\ .,,' ,.:--- ,~....
~ il 2i'~ ,'.....
d(' R' ":,:.\ .:...
. -~ 1 '.l~( /--....
:f!,") \ /~~
.. I \ ,. -;~~-:.:.;:':.--
/_~~ \,. .- .-.
// r ~'H3~<-'-~":"~;
! ,,-/ /'1
/ . ~ .
~ .: i ',(
( s..~'
~'''I:
l:. ,.
)0' ?
Vi
./
. ...
..
..
-
CONTRACT 0IDMBER 910141
~-=~
"
:_>
;;f ~
,--
~
,
/
/
/
..,.
...?
.".
.~,
\
lvI
L/
:J
/ / r:..
/ '
/
/
/
/
/
/
I
i"-, /'
! ,"'\
! ~ "
: m".....
~";>"".. .
'0
~~._~.
"
-
..,.:---
......
-
114
i-
:,-
\
.\~~
.~
!30
ROUTE 10/LANDFILL DRIVE AREA SEWER ASSESSMENT DISTRICT PROJECT
109
-
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Page --.:. of ~
Meeting Date:
Auqust 24. 1994
Item Number: 8 . B . 10 . b .
Subject:
Award of Construction Contract #94-0115R swift Creek Water
Treatment Plant Expansion Joint Replacement
County Administrator's Comments:
/~~
County Administrator: ~~ ~ r ~
Board Action Requested:
staff requests that the Board of Supervisors award the construction
contract in the amount of $67,375.00 to the second low bidder, Eastern
utilities, and authorize the County Administrator to execute the
necessary contract documents.
Summary of Information:
The expansion joints on the concrete spillway of the dam at the Swift
Creek Water Treatment Plant require rehabilitation and replacement. The
necessary work to complete this task must be accomplished while the
reservoir level is below the overflow elevation (water not running over
spillway) .
Preparer:
We have received three (3) bids for this project: $15,168.00,
$67,375.00 and $161,210.00. The low bidder submitted an alternate to
the material specified. We have compared the two (2) products and
determined that the alternate material is not "or equal". Therefore, we
recommend that this contract be awarded to the second low bidder,
Eastern utilities, utilizing the method and material that was specified
in the RFP. Funds for the project are available in the current Capital
Improvement Budget.
~J
/' -J ~/ .,.J
'c;~. B~
Title: Director of utilities
Attachments:
. Yes DNO
I # 1.1.0
-
...-.
.\\\\'-~
~
THIS SITE
POCAHONTAS
STATE PARK
VlCINITY MAP
SCALE: 1" == 2.4 MILES
1.11
-
-
_::::.:!= :;1/'
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Page ---1 of --.....L
Meeting Date:
August 24. 1994
Item Number: 8.B.lO.c.
Subject:
Award of Water Contract Number 930093 for the Construction of
the Jahnke Road Water Line, Phase II
County Administrator's Comments:
~~
County Administrator: '~~h~
~~
JI
Board Action Requested:
Staff requests that the Board of Supervisors award the contract to G. L.
Howard, Inc. in the amount of $794,505.00 and authorize the County
Administrator to execute the necessary documents.
Summary of Information:
The Jahnke Road Water Line, Phase II is the second of two capital
improvement projects which will transport water from the City of
Richmond to Chesterfield County pursuant to the agreement between the
County and Richmond. Additional supply will increase the County's
current capacity by up to 20 million gallons per day in 1996. The
project is designed to transport water from the intersection of Dwayne
Lane and Winslow Road to Pocono Pumping Station. Staff requests that
the Board award Contract Number 930093 for the construction of the
Jahnke Road Water Line, phase II to G. L. Howard, Inc., the lowest
responsible bidder, in the amount of $794,505.00. The bid opening was
held August 4, 1994. A total of four (4) contractors submitted bids
ranging from $794,505.00 to $1,309,345.00. Funds for this construction
are appropriated in the current Capital Improvement Budget. This bid is
consistent with the engineer's estimate.
~ Title:
Preparer: , '1 ~d' Q. 'I
ary Beasley
Senior Enqineer
Attachments:
. Yes DNO
1#
112
-
-
CONTRACT NUMBER 930093
JAHNKE ROAD WATER LINE, PHASE II
113
-
-
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Page --.1 of -L
Meeting Date:
AUl:ust 24. 1994
Item Number: 8. B .11. a.
Subject:
Change Order #2 for County Project #90-0385B
Jahnke Road Water Line, Phase I
Administrator's Comments: ~ ~
7Jd(~ ~~ Jz- L!t,/L
Administrator:
County
County
Board Action Requested:
Staff requests that the Board approve Change Order #2 for construction
with the contractor, G. L. Howard, Inc., in the amount of $79,831.00 and
authorize the County Administrator to execute the necessary contract
documents.
Summary of Information:
Change Order #2 includes additional work and materials required to
extend the 36 inch water line under Buford Road. The change order is a
result of field conditions that could not have been anticipated during
the design process. Funds for this change order are available in the
current Capital Improvement Budget.
Title:
Senior Enqineer
preparer6 D&
Gary Beasley
Attachments:
DYes _NO
1#
.:L1Lf
-
-
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Page -2- of2-
Meeting Date: August 24, 1994
Item Number:
8.B.ll.b.
Subject: Change Order to the APAC Contract for Lori Road Improvements
County Administrator's Comments:
CountyAdmlnistrator: ~/lJk~ tv ),$
BoardAction Requested:
Approve change order to APAC - VA, Inc. Lori Road Improvements in
the amount of $18,440.
Summary of Information:
The Board of Supervisors awarded a contract to APAC - VA, Inc. in
the amount of $51,732 in June 1994 for improvements to the
intersection of Lori Road and Lucy Corr Drive. The attached
change orders exceed the "not more than 25% Rule" per the State
Code Section-11-55 and therefore requires Board of Supervisors
approval. New contract amount will be $70,172. The change orders
will facilitate pedestrian uses between the government complex,
maintenance buildings and Branche's Trace by constructing
sidewalks and adding additional curb and gutter to the county
garage area. Funds are available.
~
Preparer: .... //
p-, .
Thomas H. Spence
Title:
Acting
Director. General Services
Attachments:
[J Yes
. No
I # 115
I
-
-
~
~
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Page -L otL
Summary of Information: (Continued)
Budget and Management comments:
Funds in the amount of $18,440 are available in the Jail Annex
project to cover the cost of change orders for the improvements
to the intersection of Lori Road and Lucy Corr Drive. These
funds are available in the Jail Annex project due to the fact
that the utility connections cost less than initially budgeted.
/r,; /,." U
" " / 'v' ., "
'~}11'/j( '"",,/I Ji;~;'[hU.{-1,'
James J.vL. ste maier, Director
-13udge~ & Management Department
1#
1.:1. C:,
I
-
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Page 1. of 1.
Meeting Date: Auqust 24, 1994
Item Number:
8.B.12.a.
Subject:
Approval of Utilities Contract for Virginia Trunk Center - SOl
West Hundred Road - Contract Number 92-0108
County Administrator's Comments:
E~~
County Administrator: ~~~ ~
Board Action Requested:
Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors approve this contract and
authorize the County Administrator to execute any necessary documents.
Summary of Information:
This project includes the extension of 972 L.F.~ of 15" oversized
wastewater lines. The developer is required to have an S" wastewater
line to serve his development; therefore, staff has requested the
wastewater lines be oversized to provide service to adjoining
properties. In accordance with the ordinance, the developer is entitled
to refunds for the cost of oversizing the wastewater lines.
Developer:
Contractor:
Virginia Truck Center of Richmond, Inc.
Piedmont Construction Company, Inc.
Contract Amount: Estimated Total -
Total Estimated County Cost:
Wastewater (Oversizing)
(Refund thru connections)
Estimated Developer Cost
Code: (Oversizing)
District: Bermuda
$41,179.25
$8,359.20
$32,820.05
5N-572WO-E4C
Preparer:
(. ., /) .1 /.)
I j \.:' If '
t\l (./;If'-'l 'J. i tho /vy,zr'
David A. Knapp I J'-
Title:
Senior Enqineer
Attachments:
. Yes DNO
1#
11:7
-
~
.-
~~
CONTRACT NUMBER 92-0108
\\l.\'\~",.. \~~.,. .'~' ~~ //
~\\\., 0~."~~"'- = . /(:
":~:~\~~~~vV' ~ !/'77)
'\"~~~ ~~~ ~
----../'~... -
'../ ~
'" "--/...
BEK'MUDA
PAR l<.
INDlJ<5Tl<\AL
PA!2: \<.,
VIRGINIA TRUCK CENTER
801 WEST HUNDRED ROAD
\
1.18
-.
-
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Page 1. of 1.
Meeting Date:
Auqust 24, 1994
Item Number:
8.B.12.b.
Subject:
Approval of Water Contract for Windsor Park, Section 2 -
Contract Number 90-0424
County Administrator's Comments:
~~
County Administrator: l/u/I'..(R~ /JL- ~
Board Action Requested:
Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors approve this contract and
authorize the County Administrator to execute any necessary documents.
Summary of Information:
This project includes the extension of 2,505 L.F.I of 12" oversized
water lines. The developer is required to have an 8" water line to
serve his development; therefore, staff has requested the water lines be
oversized to provide service to the adjoining properties. In accordance
with the ordinance, the developer is entitled to refunds for the cost of
oversizing the water lines.
Developer:
Contractor:
Milhiser Halsey Land Development
Lyttle Utilities, Inc.
Contract Amount: Estimated Total -
Total Estimated County Cost:
Water (Oversizing)
(Cash Refund)
Estimated Developer Cost
Code: (Oversizing)
District: Matoaca
$64,450.50
$11,094.15
$53,356.35
5B-572WO-E4C
Preparer:
(" - I ! c'
,\J.;\ /e I/vi \,_ ,j \
. (.,~ ../ ~ ~.,' . Vf/L.(t .-?l-t-/
1/'-
David A. Knapp
Title:
Senior Enqineer
Attachments:
. Yes DNO
1#
119
-
-
CONTRACT NUMBER 90-0424
\ S'~
~co
" YY-o
/
~
"'~
)
\
WINDSOR PARK, SECTION 2
120
-
-
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Page i of ~
Meeting Date:
Auaust 24. 1994
Item Number: 8.B.13.a.
Subject:
Request for permission to Construct a 12' All Weather Driveway
within an Existing 50' Right of Way Known as Summit Acres Lane
County Administrator's Comments:
~~
County Administrator: ~~~ ~ J-fl#-
Board Action Requested: Staff recommen~ that the Board of Supervisors
grant to SLAt Inc. permission to construct an all weather driveway within
an existing 50' right of way known as Summit Acres Lane; subject to the
execution of a license agreement.
Summary of Information:
SLAt Inc. has requested permission to construct a 12' all weather
driveway within an exiting 50' right of way known as Summit Acres Lane.
This request has been reviewed by staff and approval is recommended.
District: Midlothian
pr.par.r~/fl-J. ~
John W. Harmon
Tide:
Riaht of Way Manaaer
Attachments:
.yes DNO
1#
-121
-
-
VICINITY SKETCH
REQUEST FOR PERMISSION TO CONSTRUCT A 12' AL_
AN EXISTING 50' RIGHT OF WAY KNOWN AS SUMMI~
SLA INC
WEATHER DRIVEWAY WITHIN
ACRES LANE
x
... .....--.
........,.;,.,
-
.... j .
(ll~P 2':' "?-I 0.1: 101'1'
-
P.l
l~.. ~ I. ,,""r '''''10 .ccu'''' h.1d ""'r ,I ,h' ..,,,,... ,h."" .",,," N. bll' CII'fl",.d ""U' mr ,,""Yl,'oo: 1.,1 ." ,,,,p,,,.,,.m,"II"~ Yl.1>" .,,.,.... .1
'"''''',"''' "0'. "",,",''''' ,n.,'.'" "'.0 ..c.OI<""'..II or ''''p....m.nll ,,,... Iro.., .41'''''"0 po,""'"'' hom ,,,,,,..,p.,""'" 0"'" """ .no.... ..,.."
OK/ner' Irb~ N. 8rolUn Jl/~~GW~-:Ja~:!1:tb:/ 't.fIJ~1'
.t:J.~.r[ge p.8eOjlL..J,e3.(j,5 pelQ eu"m-PnI.1f'.5?oO!l5 ~/(jcffi:d1V't:J o.~,~ ~
7't11./-tv'ap No.I"',/I(!)eo) c'qlt: ~.fr;'lH. ~
I)br'~' Clover" /1//1 7f~/O <"\C1e.v"'Cv,lnc, ~rnii~;If" rJO. 0
rICJ-!?10:!J4 f(ff""'-'IYxx:i.(Unabk:: todcfer'r17lhe. tbcaf/Or, "Ill.... rl!t41
6') of Vq:x:= b:rrnt rcif~ccd /17 1:H!J.E:'B~p.{021 B'.4Q .. VV/ft B
UI?;>-??/)L, 1J,fj.$S8 p~~7'.) r1~O I rlif' ",'
~tt"H~'Cls:....:. -...... Mon~f,
~1>.rJ.TH 0./1' ~ b . {d.
~ t .0
(~ '(1'
j/J ,'J-;A .~ ::J
8 oward L Vanoe ~\( 1\0
. No.1 B!l4 , I l;L l~f'
"'2,.:... Z q -9 '1 ~b.{r)
-l-1lvJJ ~~r} {~d
. fttt~.t i~ c1
0" f' ~fJ
f (').~
Of' \.~(O)
o
VI///A ~LctA-h'<'T--- ~' ~~ C:;~/a~.,4'~
~ / fr)YC<~
&!f:& g~OM!1~::lZrfJagf3u~bA:dNtJRA 'LZEQ
.e~ ^" Midlofh1an ol5trlc'l' Ul \.
Che6kr!lefd county., VIrginia
~........-_...-----
(j;.~e dcre:s
. (VQconr)
.LJj
'f-.
L-)w
l
i-c.onllhe
dP o.!l'
_ t'G-\<'
O'''b'b ,~/,tr,~
..e(; /",,"~o.s ~
:0 ~
'~O,~ ~O:<t ?t:b'
'<.I ~Q
Dala:
a-f:'?J.~-1-
Seale:
/"-/00' .
Job No.:
~1-O!J I
i , IJ
1.23
501 Bran
PosHr' brand rl1)( tranamlllal rnomo 7lrn
\
RI!.~\..!.Ct,p."o TOMO"~OW
-
.....~
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Page -L of ---L-
Meeting Date:
Auaust 24. 1994
Item Number: 8.B.13.b.
Subject:
Request permission to Encroach wi thin a Drainage and Utility
Easement Across Lot 3, Block K, Forest Acres, Section C
County Administrator's Comments:
~~
Connty Administrator: ~~~ r-
Board Action Requested: Staff recommends that
grant Leisa D. Wamsley permission to construct
a portion of the easement; subject to the
agreement.
LItf2-
the Board of Supervisors
a split rail fence within
execution of a license
Summary of Information:
An application requesting permission to encroach within the easement was
received from Leisa D. Wamsley. Environmental Engineering has reviewed
this request and feels that the flow of water through the easement will
not be affected.
District: Clover Hill
Preparer: ";:;;.~.J rd.-"..,
John W. Harmon
Title:
Riaht of Way Manaaer
Attachments:
. Yes UNO
1#
124
-
VICINITY SKETCH
REQUEST PERMISSION TO
EASEl-1:ENT ACROSS LOT 3
LEISA D WAMSLEY
ENCROACH WITHIN A DRAINAGE AND UTILITY
BLOCK K FOREST ACRES SECTION C
~ oJ """hRRAHO-= '~l;~;?~}~~~fi~~:~~',~:~~ IGil1 ~I ~\~~Plr",-~~.if i
~~ \\ j:; if'...J!:o" j\', @a.-:..", t] "'''''~/1'~' 1:= \ ~RI
~ ~~ \ i~ ~ BRIARCLI ?RI~~j' .1:~)p ~7 P'~~:::JG iflE" >Ii . ~7cj
; J':?:. ASHLEY \ !" '" \\ ~II 'c= 'Rea%s' El--=-, ~ i Q 4C
l~ WOOD '..J Church of ,~ i~~)1.,ff. \ ES ""Ill> """l~f}~r;' ) ?'c:l~
~f ~ i Epiphany r1 ",- I~,~r~-, j ,~ \ ! '~/'!tI}- ,
~7p;:~.",._L~_=,-,,-_~' oc:",~~~O:>:.:f:(;> I :.rJ1} \f\ II {jff/'k"J;. , .~_ &o&~ 'j'-('
;Z:::'m-~~fll!!,---"'1;"'-'-- OR-="-'--'" .'" c;. "':.~'vI....3!LJ,'$2 . .~ -- .. - ;.: ,pc, (,s~'~"'''-_' - """" . ~t:=-':
:- ~\rz" ~ "''''U' i.';. _ ;:-~ ,:;,~ - !!'?;~ '\, \' ?A~~,KLN.GSWOQO L. ':
!", :;0 \~ "7 /"l'/}tr,.;,/.i~~~ ~.,.- ;;:::'-J.9 :;) ~."'" ('("Ir!>' r~t
fNfCROf\\;':.I'I,.:!.;r,,_ - ...~'<;}' ';,~ ~.;~."" ;<~ \,:1 I =.~A--~l' :, ~';.:/ ,;;"'~'/J.j, 647
._<=-' ",," " _//1>:// ~ THEMEADO"""' :;iff ~,,,, O~;.:
1 \ ':J-g \;-,~ .?{,,'?-~. _,;...-..,__-:;;.... ",y :y"C'"> ~, 't~ il -r-".1:. ,~G~. q.."",It -',
h ~\t~;:;\~ONACAN (7~:~::"~ !LJ?~ ~!I!~\~'(~~,,~J,{~ ~ ~
I \ J-.,., ( HILLS >:;,,:,,1 ,::; 1 rlC~llf 07 :,~ \",? ~//fr4;."
\ H ~ "';l \,;t ,qo ~ ),fJl~~UTH 18 \, ~ ,J \ 3\~~:,\) t-<J
\~,\\o~ ..,~ 0"~... v~'!fpr ~Oi :I~.--?"/' '~'''...",~'':: WINT
o~''O '" ,. ~=" ... fRANCI!("@ 1"" ~5-- V' - HILL
~\\l5I~c~.-"J'/-': _1'-_ _:-=dl 688 ,! ..~.,' ""'''''''', ~'t-, ----""-n< .-- .,
I : I.. 1\,.- \'~ '_, ~ I ~ ,~ -- C1:\ i ~ ~~:> ::, ~"_,;-P
'I ~\)",\\.~\~ "\~ ,1:~~rcp ::: ~f '~,\, ~,\\)i\)~\ R!L:,~~\~ ;?1t,;~~ :l'~
, 'tlov0\.\\,~ ('/>I:,.lCJR' '(f.!( I - ~"'"---"" - ':::-... I rlO .~
,~., _" H'EA'--BEPIDG- .?u:/-- g:;:;::::. "'~. ?-~~ ,,~..f...I.~.
'__-': oC'~ '~,%-l_JEAST!i.JFF OR ~ I \ I ~ ',z. '~ ~Q,;;-If:::: '::':.~ <{..~ -:7 ..:.-IY~:~I
\:O,r-.;;::<:.,.9. ~~ 1::'?t?~~~~-,',J 'I .i~ .~..;;y .?"'?"/'"-:-
,.o,,7J. ~ ~~..., t{Cl::" ..,o::.~=~ :;. ,~~,,y ;'~~' / ,~..../-::/<.,;
{'!' ~ ~;.~/'lf'~~ 0 ,i;'" ',(p.'1VH RO :'~i-::::- ,.":1"":'\ "??,' ~.... ~...:
J \~....,':~ 'I" -90 "J';:~~. C : '3: ~/j A,'. ! ESl: AC ~:::1'~ "l /.. - r cP'" --~~~~/
~i\'~~ ~ ':::) 2 ;:1;'(; :4J ~ ~: f" '~I::L~~~',) / ,,) ;...."" _ '~~r~j, -. ('/~
~5&\\~ 1:S\lc0'(j: ,MANSFiELD( .., ~~EcRYST1ff.c'~10~;: ,;' ~ ;~~~_. ,'~-t:"
~"'720'~ ~~. s~~ , _C_R,~~Ci ,flP1 ~,t).A&MS,--~_!)~ OR ~ ' ;.-it' ~ ''1,,) i.~.1 '~
~ PJ!ll:'i" .- ,! ;;p IS\" ~Y\ r~~~STSUCHW:-~"~ - 2-
RiDGE;::. ~": '" c.J/~-:-/. ,,1'\ ;;':,"0' J\ I ~~ ~)o~' ~~.~.. '~y" ,,~'! ::'
iTERR H~:>?OWao~.QR; '.1 ~IO"" v1z q~/'~I --' ~~~VI..- 0~/" i
;cr ~ ,~:;; , , ,.3:t' <$'/ '? - ~I: o~t,I!l~,~ i! '?;"'.. A~ / -
.:S ~ ;=:~. ~~ . -:. ~~ \~T-"'-'\~ / ~ @ ~.
',~ ,,>(.1 Fj", , I~ t ,;JUOA ,;ntr31 "(. RUNNYtAED~~~f I,}~~f " 67, <?">(
t", 7.',~""" - .;1 " , , '" ',,'/l~~ I. '~R,"~':s?~~\. ~ /"" ~:';l
. _, " ~. :'" y~~\", COD ~~:~ :!'s /,~ DA~S "'",/ ,~''';
I ,;.~, ''-) 1I,T',',iO" ~',V,k,I.~Gb-,'/l ,- . ~ A ~ ~6'~'S9_, - L.' ,DW G',~+J!\ " ,c\~~'::P
J--'':', ,,~ . ~-'- \\.t<~1 _' .'-= ,~llqEl!.r:s.~ ..ild'" l-,,~,,[f'.>__2j;~'oy' .
: ~ - ,4V', ',"~f'f~'f.?1. ~-~. :r--~~...:i f ~~0-[. <l'J'" ...~ /.'/' WagstaH C".
~....~ ' "~' <J' q,~a"'1- i,.. r" Co 10
~ ~ ,~~ 1'01: '; '9 r 0
i:?~~r.1' c('-9t'...r'1-- '"dS71i.,
-?, l" 0- ~ ~(.E:~;;;
'i<' CASTLE "1- '~J',"rl :t ,,;:<.\
GLEN E:i'~,r,:<,~~/.~\
G({!{C;"o;-~ "''0 BEXlE
'> -=::>~ WEST
~'\ _~,,",\i\i
~~'-"
~:::;::. ,
,
~.op..O
,,;<Ill
/
\\ :::;
;\ ~
~~LS~,~ ~
eyA\~ ;
ffr 4'Y"\'
LOC'"HjRA~
..!,QEH BA~I" '~,~.i
~., "
.~" ,",~~f1iGI'_('~,::: ASf1.C..;n.
-~~~_.. ..,~
-..", ~ v,', ,--
, '-. :I"~ ;~l '
:,._,~.:'.;" " " ,c, Jff .
.. "7'", ~
:._~-,_" ,~~ ,- 'c' '.......-, -
~.. ',~. ..~O~KW.OOJi..:: ':, Gregorus, P
r. .. ,; J-:',
@"RC
i'.
PARK""
.-;- ".--
~
:>-J WILLIAM
GWYN
E.STATES
1f
125
'....., ....-:
LJP.'
~ V"e ~
~ '9-7 ~
~ \
..... ~\
~~ ~\j :i' \
""~ 'r
"..; ~ ~ ~ ~ \
~ ~ ~?~ ~. .
\.'\) ~~ ~ ~ \
.. ........." ~ \J'\
~
-
r'
~/~'r?tvI&
4r- P;z./IIF'rt Fel'lee /4. ~I
v., -;,.
~~\
~rt
I
1
I
I · ',.'
'" .:
:!"\ --. -..... ~.
~ ~ ~'- ~
~~
,
,
,
,
,
....
,
,.
/
1-3 ()()i"tJ
ro ::r 0 .
I ~ ro s:: 0
ro rn =' .
I '0 rtrt
I ::r ro '< tt
0 H 0
i =' HlO~
I ro /-'. Hl
ro >l:>
I Z I-'()C
I 0 p..::r
. .. ro
I rn
I <:rt
-..J /-,.ro
,:::. H H
OJ lOHl
I I /-'. /-'.
I-' =' ro
I w /-'. I-'
- - --..- 0'1 PJp..
~ I-'
N
W
OJ
~~~ W
N
~ \ '
~
~..
~
....,,-~
~~
.....
~
.....
:--\-
.......
~.
'^
126
-
-
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Page .i of ---L..
Meeting Date:
AUQ'Ust 24. 1994
Item Number: 8. B.l). c.
Subject:
Request to Quitclaim a Portion of a variable Width Drainage
Easement Across Property Owned by Trivon Development, L.P.
County Administrator's Comments:
~~
County Administrator: ~~.(?~ r- L,faz
Board Action Requested: Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors
authorize the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors and the County
Administrator to execute a quitclaim deed to vacate a portion of a
variable width drainage easement across Trivon Development, L.P.
Summary of Information:
David Warriner of Jordan Engineers, on behalf of Trivon, has requested
the quitclaim of the portion of easement across Trivon's property, in
proposed Roxshire, Section 13. The portion of easement is no longer
needed. This has been reviewed and approved by staff.
District: Matoaca
preparer:~7J.0?LhI
John W. Harmon
Title:
Riaht of Way Manaaer
Attachments:
. Yes DNO
1#
.:l~~
,"""
-
VICINITY SKETCH
REQUEST TO QUITCLAIM A PORTION OF A VARIABLE WIDTH DRAINAGE EASEMENT
ACROSS PROPERTY OWNED BY TRIVON DEVELPPMENT LP
ll/Illr, ~~
",/fO!; ,- ,,,<
'",,';;'4
.S'", '~,"~
~r' ,"
,-''''~
4'
-,;;
"_=_PIf /
-:~.
/
..
~ ;::::=' ---- .
---' '
Iisbury cc :______________ /
.{'
I
;
,~
If
128
...
-
7
~ 48 ~
!ZJ ....
~w
~ 8 ':i
~n.
!Z] G .
~ C)',::
~~
s "6
~o
49 C)CD
C)fi'I
~w
~ ct:.D
9 ~ ~S(.
ct:. n.
~ co C)
~~
~ ~4.
~ ~
~
10
I~
,;
~
m/VON DEVELOPMENT, L.P. <::I
PART OF 0.8. 2104, PC. 451. lIS
I
f-..<o
C'5<;:)
~lt)
~ti,
:<:Cl..
l.,j
~.
l:5o,
,,~
~~
~ ~
Clctl
Io-:'tl
1q ~
l.,jCl
PORT/ON TO BE VACA!FD
EXST. VAR. mOTH DRAINAGE: &- SEWER
EASEMENT. DEED BOOK 2057, Pc. 24 AND
DEED BOOK 2037. Pc. 266.
---
N8-1'31 "J'O.W
N/I .
r ED/Tli R JOHNSON
SURVEY PLAT
SHOWING A PORTION OF AN EXISTING
VARIABLE WID TH DRAINAGE EASEMENT
TO BE VA CA TED. L OCA TED ON
TAX MAP PARCEL NO. 8-14-1-10
MIDLOTHIAN MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY, VIRGINIA
SCALE': 1>>= 100' DA TE: JUNE 22, 1994
REV J&Y~. /99~
I
I
i29
JORDAN CONSULTING ENGINEERS, P. C.
2540 PROFESSIONAL ROAD
RICHNONO, VIRGINIA 23235
I/Inn~a,. ~ II"ID
.IInn~DrJ ~ rcn
~Qnl:rA C"1' n~
,.......
-
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Page --1... 0 f -L..
Meeting Date:
Auaust 24. 1994
Item N urn ber:
8.B.14.
Subject:
Conveyance of an Easement to Virginia Electric and Power
Company
County Administrator's Comments:
~~
County Administrator: ~~ J2~ -t:- ~
Board Action Requested: Authorize the Chai an of the Board of Supervisors
and the County Administrator to execute an easement agreement with
Virginia Electric and Power Company to provide overhead power for service
to mobile classrooms behind Meadowbrook High School.
Summary of Information:
Staff requests that the Board of Supervisors authorize the Chairman of
the Board of Supervisors and the County Administrator to execute an
easement agreement with Virginia Electric and Power Company to provide
overhead power for service to mobile classrooms behind Meadowbrook High
School.
District: Dale
preparer:~~' 6f'~
John W. Harmon
Title:
Rioht of Way Manaoer
Attachments:
. Yes UNO
1#
130
- -
VICINI'I'Y SKETCH
CONVEYANCE OF AN EASEHENT TO VIRGINIA ELECTRIC AND POWER COMPANY
OVERHEAD POWER FOR SERVICE TO MOBILE CLASSROOMS BEHIND
MEADOWBROOK HIGH SCHOOL
11
131
I,... .....--
0\1,... ____
~:-~-
-----------.
Legend
_ ---t - Location of Boundary Lines of Right of Way
,
r
I
I
I
+
,
I
I
I
\\
\
\--J "
t9_\
Hi
I
Form No. 720489(Jan 89)
(Formerly 97556030)
-
~
--~
~.---
---
---
-----
c~
-----
--
'(\\0r\
~ \'(..00 ,L
':-\t:..~DOvJ SL--000 L.-
~
l~~
~ ,-t
C6" -'
- -,
=. -=-_ -=- = _ __J
}l..\
c. ..-..... . ...--..--.---]
~ .) - ,,':;
t; ~ ,I; ~ ~'.,J~:;_.~_.___._-_..-
._..-.~ ....-----.....-
l'
I
\ 1
. .' ---
c-==-~-= -= ---
; 1 a-IT
:"(-------- r 4D~ ~
1
-?'
60
.
Plat to Accompany
Right of Way Agreement
COR 16
VIRGINIA POWER
Virginia Electric and Power Company
District
1ERs BIJKb
District - Township-Borough
State
y
,-
S (J~ ~
Office
"PETE Rs, ~ V R.-b
Estimate Number - '2
o z.. - YO"1- \\ '::> ~
Date By
,-Z:z. -Cl4 W.
County-City
C HE~TER. t=IEL D
Plat Number
..
-
-
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Page -L of -L
Meeting Date:
AUQ'Ust 24, 1994
Item Number: 8. B .15.
Subject:
Acceptance of a Parcel of Land from Chesterfield Mall
Associates, containing 0.272 Acres for Dedication of Proposed
Koger Center Blvd.
County Administmtor's Comments:
~~
County Administrator: ~~-€ ~ j>- l...t!I2.
Board Action Requested: Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors
accept the conveyance of this parcel of land, and authorize the County
Administrator to execute the necessary deed.
Summary of Information:
Staff requests the Board of Supervisors accept the conveyance of a parcel
of land containing 0.272 acres for the dedication of a portion of
proposed Koger Center Blvd. This dedication is necessary for the
development of Lowe's.
District: Midlothian
prepar~,,,p;t5Y~
ohn W. Harmon
Title:
Riaht of Way Manaaer
I- 1.33
Attachments:
.Yes DNO
,~
-
VICINITY SKETCH
ACCEPTANCE OF A PARCEL OF LAND FROM CHESTERFIELD MALL ASSOCIATES
CONTAINING 0.272 ACRES FOR DEDICATION OF PROPOSED KOGER CENTER BLVD
p----- 67
. ~
~ RIVER OAKS
f;j
.N
~O
.J::;-
t:
~
~
1.34
-
-
I"W N ;"4t1f. C - '''1.,,'
9: :<to.
\<I\r~
.
: 10'
l
l i
i ~
.:--'"
: I
! ~ ~
! ~ ~
: t;
i :..
V~
~ a
\ ~~~
\--e~~
'. ?jc;~
\. :t:
f
~~
R.~
;.'"
q-
\
OJ'
":l
_\1
!;!
a
~
'"
::=
~~ g
~~b~
~~~g
B13J..o
I>:~~
il~~
111\IIV"
J,dIJII J1 ,~V,\.S
,J'lI 1 '~~lI11iJoll
Lt~v(JlI wo-
a
~S~
;~~d
~~~C1~
~~ -.
I
I
I
I
I
!
I
il!
I
I I'
~l~
::I~
~I~
i
i
~~ i
~: I
~~ ~~il =J!} ''1'---
". 1.tf'!:1":~1.::-k-: - ~~. ---
;~~~- I
I
0-
IUP 8J
hJ
'i!:..ilJ'"
~~~tl
~>:i:1l~
~~~l;j
a~ ~
::: ~
b ~
;.. b t"-C)
., :>- "i .... ~o
~ ~ r, Q::o~~ ~ 2a ~
!.1 :!: :0.. '"-3oc;)tJj 'r~ S
- ~ ~ ~:t>. '.n,:t>. &1b,~"
a @ bt:lo::o::o'"-3
... '"-31~~~lJ) ~U~~
~ (,j!-o !:l ~
. f"! . o ~::t;
"'c3 lJ)'"-3....).:O ~~i~~
1>]"1 - l"J~ '-3'"-3~Oc;)~ ~~ ~1Ij
C! ~ ii; ~ ::tlt:l ::t:;:r.. ?=:~~
1')...1l; .... ~~ t>j~~ - c;) aa ~
~~~ ~ :t>.:t>.lJ) <i:::' :e
~I>] 8::olJ)~t>:J(.:) 8
.~~~ t:l:.s ~ n
8~ C::o'"-3 ~'u --.. ~..
. :0.. ~C::t"-~~~
""" c" ~t:l i'j ~iiiii~~i~iij~il~!il~ii~iii~
~~W ~~~~ ~ ~
t;) 0'*10 t>j t>:J ~ ~
~~~ .""<:"1 ~_o::Ol:l::
"'l>ij"1 ~~ .~._~~ ~~~.... ~ ~~ ~~~~
)..~~ .....1") (""}.t>,.~t>:J~ .f!: ~~ ~ ~ U .. ~
~"1 :J:::'l~:J:,. 0 ~
.:tJ t>J'"-3 lJ)::O~ ~ l!. It
!- c" f> c" -. Ujoc;)~:t>.t-o .. 8
'" ~ ~ ~ '"-3 c::l:l::~:J:,. .
~ ~ !;; :0.. ~l:ot>jt>j'"-':~ I ~~~~=~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~5~ 1t15
.. ~~~~ ~ ;; ::t .' _~ 'llil..rt~ "~,, <t '1 . .
'" ~ -
I .... oClj !J
<) ~ I ~
.. . ~ "-'l !:i' e ~ lH~ ~ -.
C t"-
O - b ...~ .~
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Page .L of--1.
Meeting Date:
August 24, 1994
Item Number:
ADDITION
8.B.16.
Subject:
Set a Public Hearing Date to Consider Installation of Speed Humps
on Whitepine Road, Green Cedar Lane, Chester Forest Lane, and
pine Glade Lane
County Administrator's Comments:
County Administrator:
,~
1:__ .
BoardAction Requested:
The Board is requested to set September 14, 1994, as a public
hearing date to consider the installation of speed humps on
Whitepine Road, Green Cedar Lane, Chester Forest Lane and pine
Glade Lane.
Summary of Information:
BACKGROUND: Mr. Daniel has requested a public hearing be
scheduled on September 14, 1994, for citizens who have requested
the installation of speed humps on Whitepine Road near Ironbridge
Park, Dale Woods, and Hunting Creek Subdivisions and on Green
Cedar Lane, Chester Forest Lane, and pine Glade Lane in Treemont
Subdivision.
RECOMMENDATION: If the Board wishes to pursue the public
hearing, September 14, 1994 should be set as the hearing date.
Preparer: jJlllJ~ Title:
IfJJ. McCracken
Attachments: DYes . No
Director of Transportation
I # I
-
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Page .! of 2.
Meeting Date:
Auqust 24, 1994
Item Number:
lO.A.
Report On:
Developer Water and Sewer Contracts
Background:
The Board of Supervisors has authorized the County Administrator to
execute water and/or sewer contracts between the County and the
developer where there are no County funds involved.
The report is submitted to the Board members as information.
Summary of Information:
The following water and sewer contracts were executed by the County
Administrator:
l'
1.
Contract Number:
Project Name:
89-0885
Riverton, Section A
Developer:
Riverton Associates
Contractor:
Coastline Contractors, Inc.
Contract Amount:
Water Improvements -
Wastewater Improvements -
$42,731.70
$66,767.00
District:
Midlothian
Prepared By:
,L {I ./1 I ./
/;j Li.rv'-1- t.~ ../! } 1"1 -v('<cfJ'1'
.f ,-
David A. Knapp ,
County Administrator:
Attachments:
.Yes DNo
1#
1.36
Agenda Item
August 24, 1994
Page 2
2. Contract Number:
Project Name:
Developer:
Contractor:
Contract Amount:
District:
3. Contract Number:
Project Name:
Developer:
Contractor:
Contract Amount:
District:
4. Contract Number:
Project Name:
Developer:
Contractor:
Contract Amount:
District:
......,.
92-0206
Southeastern Engineering Sales
Port Walthall Drive
Southeastern Engineering Sales, Inc.
J. Steven Chafin, Inc.
Water Improvements -
Wastewater Improvements -
Bermuda
93-0152
Harbour Pointe Village, Phase II
Brandermill Development Company, L.P.
R.M.C. Construction Company
Wastewater Improvements -
Clover Hill
93-0202
Robious Forest
D M W Enterprise LLC
Coastal Utilities, Inc.
Water Improvements -
Wastewater Improvements -
Midlothian
$11,608.00
$1,800.00
$20,931.00
$20,114.40
$11,561.30
137
-
-
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
REPORTS
Page ~ o~
Meeting Date: August 24, 1994
Item Number:
lO.B.
Report On:
status of General Fund Balance, Reserve for Future
Capital Projects, District Road and street Light Funds,
and Lease Purchases
County Administrator: ~~~
Attachments: . Yes D No
1#
-138
BOARD
MEETING
DALE
07 III 1 /94
07/27/94
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
GENERAL FUND BALANCE
August 12, 1994
-
DESCRIJ~TIOM
AMQl!NI
FY95 Budgeted Bcginning Fund Balancc*
Fund Economic Marlict Analysis and
Survcy for Ccntral Arca Phlll
. Pcndin~ outcomc of annual audit proccss.
(38,000)
BALANCE
$21,415,90(}
21,377,900
139
-
-
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
RESERVE FOR FUTURE CAPITAL PROJECTS
TRADITIONALLY FUNDED BY DEBT
August 12, 1994
Board
Meeting
Date Description Amount Balance
FY89 Excess revenue $2,119,900 $2,119,900
FY90 Budgeted addition $1,881,500 $4,001,400
Designation from June 30, 1989 $1,500,000 $5,501,400
Fund Balance
11/22/89 Purchase of land-Cogbill Road ($630,000) $4,871,400
12/13/89 Purchase building at 6701 West ($400,000) $4,471,400
Krause Road
06/30/90 Budgeted addition of excess $2,100,000 $6,571,400
revenue
06/13/90 Purchase medical building for ($735,000) $5,836,400
future library site
06/27/90 Funds to purchase land for park ($600,000) $5,236,400
on Lake Chesdin
06/27/90 Budgeted but not appropriated funds ($2,000,000) $3,236,400
to purchase land for school
and park sites
FOR FISCAL YEAR '91 BEGINNING JULY 1. 1990
12/12/90
Fill dirt for cover repair at Fort
Darling Landfill
($180,000)
$3,056,400
06/30/91
Budgeted addition from FY91
revenues
$4,000,000
$7,056,400
03/13/91
Designated but not appropriated
funds to cover construction
($1,806,800)
$5,249,600
140
-
-
contract for MH/MRlSA building
if bonds are not sold in
fall, 1991
FOR FISCAL YEAR '92 BEGINNING JULY 1. 1991
07/01/91 Regional Jail Authority as ($1,000,000) $4,249,600
approved in the FY92 Adopted
Budget (which will be reimbursed)
08/28/91 Provide funding for improvements ($315,000) $3,934,600
at Northern Area Landfill
to allow reallocation of
General Fund dollars to recycling
programs
08/28/91 Additional funding for Bon Air ($275,500) $3,659,100
Library expansion
08/28/91 Add back MH/MR building funds $1,806,800 $5,465,900
which were previously deducted
for construction
11/27/91 Appropriated funds for T.V. ($115,000) $5,350,900
arraignment equipment but holding
in reserve account until prices
and all costs are confirmed
03/27/92 Add back funds previously deducted $2,000,000 $7,350,900
to purchase land for school
and park sites
03/27/92 Funds designated for interest ($1,400,000) $5,950,900
cost in FY94 due to accelerated
1988 School bond issue
04/08/92 Designated but not appropriated ($2,314,800) $3,636,100
funds for CenterPointe Fire
Station construction in FY95
FOR FISCAL YEAR '93 BEGINNING JULY 1.1992
04/08/92
FY93 budget addition
$2,600,000
$6,236,100
$5,236,100
04/08/92
FY93 Capital Projects (revenue
sharing roads $500,000; indus-
trial access $300,000; drainage
$200,000)
($1,000,000)
:141
-
04/08/92 Funds to convert Meadowdale ($1,386,500) $3,849,600
Boulevard building into Hopkins
Road Library
04/08/92 Funds to construct lights along ($500,000) $3,349,600
portions of Jefferson Davis Hwy
05/13/92 Funding for emergency access for ($80,000) $3,269,600
Millside subdivision contingent
upon necessary right-of-way
acquisition
07/22/92 Funding for design phase of Jail ($500,000) $2,769,600
Annex
07/22/92 Funds to purchase Castlewood ($315,000) $2,454,600
08/31/92 Budget Change Request to fund ($14,000) $2,440,600
wetland study of property on
Cogbill Road
09/09/92 Supplement to finish improvements ($13,400) $2,427,200
to intersection of River and
Walkes Quarter roads
09/09/92 Funds for Charter Colony Parkway ($140,000) $2,287,200
09/09/92 Sidewalk at Enon Library ($20,000) $2,267,200
11/12/92 Designated and appropriated, if ($326,000) $1,941,200
needed, funds to cover shortfall
in construction of Public Safety
Training Building
11/24/92 Increase from FY92 Results of $661,550 $2,602,750
Operations
12/09/92 Unappropriated funding for TV $115,000 $2,717,750
arraignment
12/09/92 Appropriated $1,941,200 balance ($2,717,750) $0
plus $661,550 addition from FY92
ending fund balance and use of funds
previously appropriated for TV
arraignment $115,000 for Jail Annex
12/09/92 Unappropriated funds from 11/12/92 $139,980 $139,980
142
- -.
appropriation for construction
of Public Safety Training
Building
12/09/92 Appropriated to cover shortfall ($139,980) $0
in construction of Jail Annex
06/30/93 Enon Library Sidewalk- $13,401 $13,401
project complete
06/30/93 Funds which were not needed for the $186,020 $199,421
Public Safety Training Building.
Interest on the bonds was
sufficient to cover this appro-
priation.
FOR FISCAL YEAR '94 BEGINNING JULY 1.1993
05/12/93 Appropriated FY94 funds for Cedar ($35,000) $164,421
Springs Rural Road addition (FY94
Secondary Road Improvement)
07/01/93 FY94 Budgeted Addition $3,500,000 $3,664,421
07/01/93 FY94 Capital Projects ($2,793,000) $871,421
07/28/93 Appropriated funds to cover entire ($80,700) $790,721
cost of Keithwood/Hylton Park
Drainage project.
08/25/93 Supplemental revenue sharing match ($200,000) $590,721
for FY93 to fund Ledo Road
09/08/93 Supplemental appropriation for ($91,000) $499,721
Charter Colony Parkway
10/13/93 Transfer for Northern Area ($370,000) $129,721
Landfill
11/23/93 Transfer from fund balance $2,800,000 $2,929,721
as per Section 18 of the
FY94 Appropriations Resolution
11/23/93 Transfer for Phase I development ($660,000) $2,269,721
of the Warbro Road Athletic
Complex
12/15/93 Designation for John Tyler ($2,269,721 ) $0
committment pending decision
1.43
.- .-
on Bond Keferendum date.
04/27/94 Reduce designation for John $49,400 $49,400
Tyler Community College by
$49,400 to $2,220,321
04/27/94 Designate funds in order to ($49,400) $0
begin advance work needed to con-
struct the Christmas Mother and
County Warehouse (These funds
will be returned after July 1)
OS/25/94 Reduce designation for John $500,000 $500,000
Tyler Community College by
$500,000 to $1,720,321
OS/25/94 Transfer funds to begin repairs ($500,000) $0
on the EttricklMatoaca and
LaPrade branch libraries
06/08/94 Release funds designated for $1,720,321 $1,720,321
John Tyler Community College
06/08/94 Loan to Health Care Commission ($1,000,000) $720,321
06/22/94 Transfer to Midlothian Branch
Library to fully fund project ($490,100) $230,221
FOR FISCAL YEAR '95 BEGINNING JULY 1. 1994
07/01/94 FY95 Budgeted Addition $4,850,000 $5,080,221
07/01/94 FY95 Capital Projects ($3,675,000) $1,405,221
07/01/94 Return funds advanced $49,400 $1,454,621
to begin construction on
Christmas Mother
Warehouse.
07/27/94 Transfer to Clover Hill Sports ($200,000) $1,254,621
Complex
144
- -,
QO .., N QO .., ~
0 N .., 0 0
Vl - Vl Vl - Vl
" c\ <:Ii a\ c\ r: M
u - N !"l - !"l -
c::
"
..
::tl
r <::> <::> <::> <::> <::> <::>
I
'"
"::::l ;:;
c::
::l ;:'3
(..;.,
(/J
I-
:I: 0 <::> <::> <::>
<::> i7i <::> <::> <::> i7i
(!) Vl Vl Vl If)
c:: M M M M M M
0 - - ... ... -
.~
...J 'f) .~
(/J C\ e..
>-
Cl (..;., ?
Z l- e..
Q.
:J W -1.
ll. W
I- 0:: QO .., N QO .., <::>
:I: I- <::> N .., <::> <::>
(!) <::> '-0 <::> <::> \0
~ ..0 -f ..0 ..0 M
..J (/J " , ~ N N
'O:t " f~
;... ~
I- 0)
0) " ".
W V C
W "'"
-
0:: N
I- "'" -.!
en -
I/)
Cl ~
Z Ol
<( ~ I"'l QO !"l 0\ 0\ -1.
<( -.
If) Vl <::> 0 Vl Z
Cl In ~ 0\ .., C"I.
<( en " ..0 M -f M ...
~ - !"l '-0 !"l I"'l
0 Cl
0::
Z ::tl
l-
t) :J
0:: Ill. 0 <::> <::> <::> 25 -1.
I- <::> Z
Vl. <::>
en Cl '" - 0
] . - ...
Cl "
<( '"
;:>
0
0:: -< iii
0 ~ ~ l/)
<::> <::> Z
'I- ~ '-0 ;;::; '-0 ~ I:C Q)
vi' vi' In In In <.l
Z ... - ... - ... e
Vl .~
W C"I Q..
;;... ....
I. :e
U e..
Q. ::s
-1. III
W -
-1. III
W I"'l QO ,.., C"I 0\ ::s
'f' In ~ <::> <::> lI'l Z t::
0:: ;; ..,. ,.., QO !"l
, ~ M r: c\ ..0 ..0 t::
" ff
:I: ;;... .. - - .., ... N III
.~ " is "-
I- V 0
....
::... Q)
_.-l E
0
<.l
....
QJ ::s
"'C 0 ("")
C ~ 0:1 ~
(Il .- ,~ t:: ~
... "'C I (Il :e rn
C,J ::J .... C,J J:: >. a:;
';: QJ (Il ... ... in t:
E 0 c
... > ~ 0 Q) Q) QJ
III .... 0 ... "'C ::J .... a. ~
QJ (Il (Il 0 0 1il
0 en () 0 :2: :2: () :z: ..
u
145
Date
Beqan
12/88
03/89
12/89
10/92
10/92
10/92
09/93
12/93
03/94
......
-
Prepared by
Accounting Department
July 31, 1994
SCHEDULE OF CAPITALIZED LEASE PURCHASES
Description
APPROVED AND EXECUTED
Airport state Police
Hangar Additions
County Warehouse
Total
Geographic Information
System ("GIS") -
Automated Mapping
System
Data Processing Equipment
School Copier
School Copier
School Copier
School Copier
Real Property Lease/
Purchase
School Computers
and Printers
TOTAL APPROVED
AND EXECUTED
Original
Amount
128,800
331,200
460,000
3,095,000
2,015,570
22,797
23,322
18,750
36,605
17,510,000
22,591
$23,204,635
None
PENDING APPROVAL AND/OR EXECUTION
Date
Ends
12/00
1/98
1/95
9/97
10/97
10/97
8/98
12/01
7/95
outstanding
Balance
07/31/94
83,595
214,958
298,553
1,760,000
28,654
15,534
16,614
13,399
32,502
16,545,000
22,591
$18,732,847
146
......
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Page -L of-1.
Meeting Date: Auqust 24. 1994
Item Number:
l5.A.
Subject:
Resolution Recognizing Mr. Michael Brian Kelley, Troop
800, Upon Attaining the Rank of Eagle Scout
County Administrator's Comments:
County Administrator:
BoardAction Requested:
Summary ofInformation:
Mr. Barber requests the Board adopt a resolution recognizing
Mr. Michael Brian Kelley, Troop 800, sponsored by Bethel Baptist
Church, upon attaining the rank of Eagle Scout.
He will be present, accompanied by members of his family, to
receive the resolution.
Resides in: Midlothian District
Preparer: :VA /).t!..,;!,I .J 'In, 'P-r;i;ta..
Theresa M. Pitts
Title: Clerk to Board of Supervisors
Attachments:
. Yes
D No
I #1.49
~.
RECOGNIZING MR. MICHAEL BRIAN KELLEY UPON
HIS ATTAINING RANK OF EAGLE SCOUT
WHEREAS, the Boy Scouts of America was incorporated by Mr.
William D. Boyce on February 8, 1910; and
WHEREAS, the Boy Scouts of America was founded to promote
citizenship training, personal development, and fitness of
individuals; and
WHEREAS, after earning at least twenty-one merit badges in a
wide variety of fields, serving in a leadership position in a
troop, carrying out a service project beneficial to his community,
being active in the troop, demonstrating Scout spirit, and living
up to the Scout Oath and Law; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Michael Brian Kelley, Troop 800, sponsored by
Bethel Baptist Church, has accomplished those high standards of
commi tment and has reached the long-sought goal of Eagle Scout
which is received by less than two percent of those individuals
entering the Scouting movement; and
WHEREAS, growing through his exper iences in Scouting, learning
the lessons of responsible citizenship, and priding himself on the
great accomplishments of his County, Michael is indeed a member of
a new generation of prepared young citizens of whom we can all be
very proud.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Chesterfield County
Board of Supervisors hereby extends its congratulations to Mr.
Michael Brian Kelley and acknowledges the good fortune of the
County to have such an outstanding young man as one of its
citizens.
1.50
'-,'
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Page ....L ofL
Meeting Date: Auqust 24. 1994
Item Number:
IS.B.
Subject:
Resolution Recognizing Ms. Pamela K. Bomboy as the 1995
Chesterfield County Teacher of the Year
County Administrator's Comments:
~~
countyAdmlnistralor:~~F~ j LtL--
BoardAction Requested:
Summary of Information :
Mr. Warren has requested the Board adopt a resolution
recognizing Ms. Pamela K. Bomboy as the 1995 Chesterfield County
Teacher of the Year.
Ms. Bomboy will be present, accompanied by members of her
family, to accept the resolution. See attached.
Preparer: \.-~U Yn - YJ~
Theresa M. Pitts
Title: Clerk to Board of Sllpprvi f':orf':
Attachments:
. Yes
D No
I #
151
-
-
RECOGNIZING MS_ PAMELA K. BOMBOY AS THE
1995 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY TEACHER OF THE YEAR
WHEREAS, the Teacher of the Year Award Program recognizes
teachers who represent the best in teaching across the
Commonwealth and Nation; and
WHEREAS, Ms. Pamela K. Bomboy was selected to represent
Chesterfield County in the 1995 Virginia Teacher of the Year
Program selection process; and
WHEREAS, Ms. Bomboy has taught science at Providence Middle
School since 1985; was a Librarian at Davis Elementary School
from 1982 to 1985; and has been in the teaching field for the
past nineteen years; and
WHEREAS, Ms. Bomboy received a Master's Degree in Library
Science from the University of pittsburgh and a Master's Degree
in Science and social Studies Education from Virginia
Commonwealth University; and
WHEREAS, early in her career, Ms. Bomboy taught in a three-
room school in the Cumberland Mountains of Kentucky where she
discovered that "nature provided a marvelous classroom;" and
WHEREAS, with a grant from the Greater Richmond
Environmental Action Trust, Ms. Bomboy has established an outdoor
classroom in a wooded area behind Providence Middle School where
she teaches her students environmental stewardship; and
WHEREAS, Ms. Bomboy will represent Chesterfield County by
competing for regional and State honors.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Chesterfield County
Board of Supervisors hereby acknowledges the good fortune of the
County to have such an outstanding individual as one of its
teachers.
AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors
hereby congratulates Ms. Pamela K. Bomboy for being named the
1995 Chesterfield County Teacher of the Year and acknowledges her
dedication to teaching.
1.52
-
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Page -1... of..L
Meeting Date:
August 24, 1994
Item Number:
16.A.
Subject:
Public Hearing to Consider an Amendment to Section 8-12.7 of the Code of the County of
Chesterfield Relating to Interest Paid on Tax Refunds.
County Administrator's Comments:
County Administrator: ~~ h'~ 4A- ~
/I
BoardAction Requested:
Adopt amendments as proposed.
Summary ofInformation:
The County historically has not had a clear policy on paying interest on erroneously assessed
tax refunds resulting in an inconsistent treatment of taxpayers. Under the existing practice, interest
is not paid on refunds in most cases because the amount of tax collected is minimal and the money
has been held for a short period of time. But in special cases, when a large amount of tax has been
assessed due solely to an error of the County Assessor or Commissioner of Revenue and held by
the County for a long period of time, the refund is paid by the Treasurer with interest. A rate of
ten percent (10%) is sometimes used because that is also the rate charged by the County for taxes
paid late. In other cases, a rate equivalent to the rate received by the County from investing the
tax receipt is used.
State law allows the County to adopt an ordinance providing for the payment of interest for
tax refunds. Staff recommends considering amending the County Code to codify the existing
practice. Under the proposed amendments, tax refunds shall be paid by the Treasurer only when
(i) the tax was erron~o essed due to the fault of the Commissioner of Revenue or the Real
County Attorney
0603:7115.2(7102.1)
1#
'153
Preparer: c-
Attachments:
. Yes
D No
.'
, ~-....,.i
~/J
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Page .2... of..1....
Summary of Information: (Continued)
Estate Assessor; (ii) the tax has been held for greater than thirty days; (Hi) the amount of interest
exceeds $100; and (iv) that the interest paid shall be at a rate equal to the interest rate the County
received by holding the funds in the County's investment portfolio, provided such rate does not
exceed ten percent (10%). As this amendment will simply codify existing practice, the Treasurer
anticipates no significant financial impact as a result of this amendment. The amendment will
apply to refunds paid by the County voluntarily as well as to refunds paid as a result of judgments
or settlements of erroneous assessment litigation. Currently, there are approximately four
erroneous assessment cases pending, one of which is in the process of being resolved and would
be affected by the adoption of this ordinance.
This is a public hearing to consider the attached amendments.
I # :154
AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE CODE OF THE COUNTY
OF CHESTERFIELD, 1978, AS AMENDED, BY AMENDING
AND REENACTING SECTION 8-12.7 RELATING TO
TAX REFUNDS
BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County:
(1) That Section 8-12.7 of the Code of the County of Chesterfield. 1978, as amended,
is amended and reenacted to read as follows:
Sec. 8-12.7. Refunds.
(a) If the commissioner of revenue or the real estate assessor is satisfied that he has
erroneously assessed any taxpayer with a local tax, he shall certify to the treasurer the
amount erroneously assessed. If the tax has not been paid, the taxpayer shall be exonerated
from payment of the tax. If the tax has been paid, the tax together with applicable penalties
and interest shall be refunded to the taxpayer in accordance with Code of Virginia, section
58.1-3990.
ill All erroneously assessed taxes refunded under this section which were
erroneously assessed due solely to the fault of the commissioner of revenue or the real
estate assessor and not due to the fault of the taxpayer in filing his return and were held by
the County for more than thirty (30) days shall be be repaid pursuant to Code of Virginia
section 58.1-3991 with interest. The interest paid under this subsection shall be paid at a
rate equal to the lesser of (i) the average interest earned on the County's investment
portfolio as reported in the treasurer's quarterly reports to the board for the periods of time
such taxes were held by the County or (ii) the rate imposed by the County for delinquent
taxes. Such interest shall run from the date such taxes were required to be paid or were
paid. whichever is later. and shall only be paid if the amount of interest owed exceeds one-
hundred dollars ($100).
(b~) No tax refund shall be made under this section if the request for a refund was
made more than three (3) years after the last day of the tax year for which the tax was
assessed.
(00) The refund procedure established by this section shall not apply to refunds
resulting from the decision of the commissioner of revenue to reclassify a business for
business license taxation. Such refunds may, however, be processed in accordance with Code
of Virginia, section 58.1-3980 and 58.1-3981.
(2) That this ordinance shall become effective immediately upon adoption.
0603:7102.1 - 1 -
1.55
Richmond
I Newspapers,Inc.
^
~
An Affiliate of Media General
P.O. BOX 85333
RICHMOND, VIRGINIA 23293-0001
(804) 649-6000
A
220805
DATE
08/10/94
COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
ATTN: JOAN DOLEZAL
P.O. BOX 40
CHESTERFIELD VA
23832
DATE
DESCRIPTION
CHARGES
CREDITS
TOTAL
INCHES AMOUNT
Il!II t!!I~ ,~ ~ ~- ....,.,.
w ,.. --.......... -~~ _~~,- ~ "'""-_.-- ""'I":""~ ~ ~ ~ -....,.
LINES RUNS
08/03/94 121
LEGAL NOTICE
SECTION 8-12.7
RELATING TAX REFUNDS
22
2
159.84
RichMond Newspapers, Inc.
Pl..lbl i shet~ of
THE RICHMOND TIMES-DISPATCH
IMf~
Take notice that the Board of Suo
pervisors of Chesterlield County.
Virginia, at a regular meeting on
August 24, 1994 at 7:00 p.m. in
the County Public Meeting Room
at Chesterlield Courthouse, Ches.
terlield, Virginia, will hold a public
hearing to consider an ordinance
to amend the Code of the County
of Chesterfield, 1978, as
amended, by amending and
reenacting Section 8.12.7 relating
to tax refunds.
A copy of the ordinance is on file
in the County Administrator's Of.
fice, Room 505, 9901 Lori Road,
Chestertield, Virginia, and may be
examined by all interested par-
sons between the hours of 8:30
a.m. to 5:00 p.m., Monday through
Frida.
This is to certify that the attached LEGAL NOTICE
was published by RichMond Newspapers, Inc., in the City
of RichMond, State of Virginia, on the following dates:
08/03/94
08/10/94
The first insertion being given....
08/03/94
HERE
Swclrn to a)'"'~UttI~sr.tl~~d befm~e
Me this
a~~~4~'
Notary Public
State 0 Virginia
Ci ty of Richmcl)'",d
My Comrn i ss i 0)'"' ex p i t~es My Commission Expires SePtember 30. 1995
'"
Ol
"'
WHEN REMITTING PLEASE REFER TO YOUR CUSTOMER # 220805
~
159.8it
o
o
I
o
...
o
o
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Page .1. of~
Meeting Date: August 24, 1994
Item Number:
16.B.
Subject:
Public Hearing to Amend FY95 Through FYOO Secondary Road six Year
Improvement Plan and FY95 Secondary Road Improvement Budget to
Include Congestion Mitigation/Air Quality Projects
County Administrator's Comments:
CounlyAdminislrator: ~~~ ~ 4if;-
1/
BoardAction Requested:
A public hearing is scheduled to discuss the addition of
congestion Mitigation/Air Quality projects to VDOT's FY95 through
FYOO Secondary Road six Year Improvement Plan and FY95 Secondary
Road Improvement Budget.
Summary ofInformation:
BACKGROUND: In May, 1994, the Board adopted VDOT's
Secondary Road six Year Improvement Plan and FY95 Budget. The
Plan identifies major construction projects anticipated in the
next six years. The Budget identifies specific project
allocations for the fiscal year. Subsequent to the Board's
approval of the Plan and Budget, VDOT determined that Congestion
Mitigation/Air Quality (CMAQ) projects must be included in the
Plan before secondary road funds can be utilized to provide the
"local match." An amendment is proposed to the Plan and Budget
to add the Providence Road/Elkhardt Road intersection improvement
project. The intersection project was previously approved by
the Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) at the County's
request. A "blanket" CMAQ project covering future undesignated
CMAQ projects should also be added to the plan to avoid
unnecessary plan amendments as new CMAQ projects are approved
each year.
(Continued on next page)
Preparer:
;e )JA.e.tA<k-,tvJ
, k
R.J. McCrae en
Director of Transportation
Title:
Attachments:
. Yes
D No
I #
1SG
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Page ~ of~
Summary of Information: (Continued)
RECOMMENDATION: staff recommends the Board adopt the attached
resolution approving the addition of the Providence RoadjElkhardt
Road CMAQ project to the Secondary Road Six Year Improvement Plan
and FY95 Budget. A "blanket" CMAQ project should also be added
to the Plan.
1#
157
II
~-
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY: At a regular
meeting of the Board of Supervisors
held at the Courthouse on
August 24, 1994, at 3:00 p.m.
WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors on May 25, 1994, approved
a Secondary Road six Year Improvement Plan and FY95 Budget; and
WHEREAS, in 1993, the Metropolitan Planning Organization
approved the County's request for the Providence RoadjElkhardt
Road intersection to be improved as a Congestion MitigationjAir
Quality (CMAQ) project; and
WHEREAS, the Virginia Department of Transportation has
informed the County that the Providence RoadjElkhardt Road
intersection project must be added to the Plan before Secondary
Road funds can be used for the required local match for CMAQ
projects; and
Whereas, undesignated CMAQ projects are anticipated in
future years of the Plan.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board approves the
addition of the Providence RoadjElkhardt Road CMAQ project and
blanket undesignated future CMAQ projects to the Plan.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, the Board approves the addition of
the Providence RoadjElkhardt Road CMAQ project to the FY95
Budget.
Vote:
Certified by:
Theresa M. Pitts, Clerk
to the Board of Supervisors
'158
-
-
.'
6~
($~/,t;,:.
l~ ~;tV
COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINIA
DAVID R. GEHR
COMMISSIONER
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
P. O. BOX 35044
RICHMOND. 23235
August 5, 1994
JAMES R. SMITH, JR.
'...... -.-. SIDE NT ENGINEER
.- (0
1/
~
Rr~O \.--
AUG , 0 ~~
,TRANSPO 1994..
DE.PItRr.~rA nON
1.1eNT ,/
,q; , . /.'
~..~;;rrrTrr\--\ ~'.
Mr. Lane B. Ramsey
County Administrator
County of Chesterfield
P. O. Box 40
Chesterfield, VA 23832
REFERENCE: Public Notice
Revised Secondary Improvement Budget
Fiscal Year 1994-95
Chesterfield County
Dear Mr. Ramsey:
Would you see that the attached notice is posted at
the Courthouse on or before August la, 1994.
Thank you for your assistance concerning this matter.
WTR: 19m
Attachment
CC: Mr. R. J. McCracken, w/attachment
fJ IJ &-
J f4v 1ft! bt
r ,fit- f'
#
.,AI
TRANSPORTATION FOR THE 21 ST CENTURY
-
PUBLIC NOTICE
The Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors and the
Virginia Department of Transportation will jointly hold a
public hearing on Wednesday, August 24, 1994, at 7:00 P.M.
The Public Hearing will be held in the Board of Supervisors
Room. The purpose of this Public Hearing is to revise the
Secondary Construction Improvement Budget Fiscal Year
1994-95 to provide funding for a CMAQ project for
improvements of Providence Road at the intersection of
Elkhardt Road. Interested citizens may present comments
regarding the additional funding for the improvements of
the above project. Information concerning revisions to
this budget is available at the Virginia Department of
Transportation, Chesterfield Residency Office, located on
Speeks Drive off Route 360.
DAVID R. GEHR
COMMISSIONER
to) /.,/
~
\/
-
........
r- :
~'-'"
cP ,
.:::;l3.., ,
C--\).:
.---"". c.t2 rir
~~ ,.
COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINIA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
P 0, BOX 35044
RICHMOND,23235
JAMES R. SMITH. JR.
RESIDENT ENGINEER
August 5, 1994
,.
'-' ,
qu
Mr. Lane B. Ramsey
County Administrator
County of Chesterfield
P. O. Box 40
Chesterfield, VA 23832
il'<'I!,
" to,
"t,
, r '.
REFERENCE: Public Notice
Revised Six Year Secondary Improvement Budget
1994-95 tbrougb 1999-2000
Cbesterfield County
Dear Mr. Ramsey:
Would you see that the attached notice is posted at
the Courthouse on or before August la, 1994.
Thank you for your assistance concerning this matter.
Sincertiiel~~' "
',) __/.../' -1.,,'
f(/-T<< -
w. T. ey )lds
Assistant Resident Engineer
WTR: 19m
At tachmen t
CC: Mr. R. J. McCracken, w/attachment
\1. 1/ b. !A(!
111,0 '1 c.r I
I ,. 1 ~j', '
TRANSPORTATION FOR THE 21ST CENTURY
.-
PUBLIC NOTICE
The Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors and the
Virginia Department of Transportation will jointly hold a
Public Hearing on Wednesday, August 24, 1994, at 7:00 P.M.
The Public Hearing will be held in the Board of Supervisors
Room. The purpose of this Public Hearing is to revise the
Six Year Secondary Construction Budget to provide funding
for a CMAQ project for improvements of Providence Road at
the intersection of Elkhardt Road. Also, funding in the
amount of $20,000 is to be budgeted in each fiscal year for
future CMAQ projects throughout Chesterfield
County.
Interested citizens may present comments regarding the
additional funding for the improvements of Providence Road
and future CMAQ projects in Chesterfield County.
Information concerning revisions to the Six Year Secondary
Construction Improvement Budget 1994-95 through 1999-2000
is available at the Virginia Department of Transportation,
Chesterfield Residency Office, located on Speeks Drive off
Route 360.
-
.-
COMMONWEALTI-I of VIRGINIA
DAVID R. GEHR
COMMISSIONER
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
POBOX 35044
RICHMOND. 23235
JAMES R. SMITH. JR.
RESIDENT ENGINEER
August 5, 1994
Richmond Newspapers, Inc.
333 East Grace Street
Richmond, VA 23219
Gentlemen:
Please publish the following Public Notice in your
newspaper:
"The Chesterrield County Board or Supervisors and the
Virginia Department or Transportation will jointly hold a
Public Hearing on Wednesday, August 24, 1994 at 7:00 P.M.
The Public Hearing will be held in the Board or Supervisors
Room. The purpose or this Public Hearing is to revise the
Six Year Secondary Construction Budget to provide runding
ror a CMAQ project ror improvements or Providence Road at
the intersection or Elkhardt Road. Also, runding in the
amount or $20,000 is to be budgeted in each riscal year ror
ruture CHAQ projects throughout Chesterfield County.
Interested citizens may present comments regarding the
additional runding ror the improvements or Providence Road
and ruture CMAQ projects in Chesterfield County.
Inrormation concerning revisions to the Six Year Secondary
Construction Improvement Budget 1994-95 through 1999-2000 is
available at the Virginia Department of Transportation,
Cbesterrield Residency Of rice, located on Speeks Drive ort
Route 360".
Please publish this notice on Wednesday, August 10,
1994 and Wednesday, August 17/ 1994. Please confirm by
calling the Chesterfield Residency Office with the Virginia
Department of Transportation at 674-2800.
Also, please remit the bill to the Virginia Department
of Transportation in care of James R. Smith, Jr., Resident
Engineer, P. O. Box 35044, Richmond, VA 23235. We would
appreciate a copy of the ad notice along with the bill.
Sincerel~'
j(/--r;' .
W. T. R yno ds
Assistant esident Engineer
/
,kITR : 1 gm
Ice: Mr. Lane B. Ramsey
Mr. R. J. McCracken
Ms. D. R. Kinton
TRANSPORTATION FOR THE 21 ST CENTURY
-
,,,,,*,,
COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINIA
DAVID R. GEHR
COMMISSIONER
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
POBOX 35044
RICHMOND. 23235
JAMES R. SMITH. JR.
RESIDENT ENGINEER
August 5, 1994
Progress Index
15 Franklin Street
Petersburg, VA 23803
Gentlemen:
Please publish the following Public Notice in your
newspaper:
"The Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors and the
Virginia Department of Transportation will jointly bold a
Public Hearing on Wednesday, August 24, 1994 at 7:00 P.M.
The Public Hearing will be held in the Board of Supervisors
Room. The purpose of this Public Hearing is to revise the
Six Year Secondary Construction Budget to provide funding
for a CMAQ project for improvements of Providence Road at
the intersection of Elkhardt Road. Also, funding in the
amount of $20,000 is to be budgeted in each fiscal year for
future CMAQ projects throughout Chesterfield County.
Interested citizens may present comments regarding the
additional funding for the improvements of Providence Road
and future CMAQ projects in Chesterfield County.
Information concerning revisions to the Six Year Secondary
Construction Improvement Budget 1994-95 through 1999-2000 is
available at the Virginia Department of Transportation,
Chesterfield Residency Office, located on Speeks Drive off
Route 360".
Please publish this notice on Wednesday, August 10,
1994 and Wednesday, August 17, 1994. please confirm by
calling the Chesterfield Residency Office with the virginia
Department of Transportation at 674-2800.
Also, please charge this bill to Account No. 1409 and
remit to the Virginia Department of Transportation in care
of Mr. ~Tames R. Smith, Jr., Resident Engineer, P. O. Box
35044, Richmond, VA 23235. We would appreciate a copy of
the ad notice along with the bill.
~~
w. /. ey
Assistan
Engineer
jWTR: 19m
CC: Mr. Lane B. Ramsey
Mr. R. J. McCracken
Ms. D. R. Kinton
TRANSPORT A nON FOR THE 21 ST CENTURY
-
-
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Page --L of ----L-
Meeting Date:
AUQ'ust 24, 1994
Item Number:
16.C.
Subject:
PUBLIC HEARING: Request to Quitclaim Portions of an Existing
Variable Width Right of Way known as Whitten Parkway
County Administrator's Comments:
County Administrator: ~~~ r ~
Board Action Requested: Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors
authorize the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors and the County
Administrator to execute a quitclaim deed to vacate portions of a
variable width right of way known as Whiten Parkway.
Summary of Information:
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. has requested the quitclaim of portions of Whitten
Parkway. These portions of right of way are no longer needed because
additional right of way, known as Walmart Way, has been dedicated. This
has been reviewed and approved by staff.
District: Midlothian
Preparer:
~~~. ryf~
ohn W. Harmon
Title:
Rioht of Way Manaoer
Attachments:
.Yes UNO
1*
159
-
-
VICINrrry SKETCH
PUBLIC HEARING: REQUEST TO QUITCLAIM PORTIONS OF AN EXISTING
VARIABLE WIDTH RIGHT OF WAY KNOWN AS WHITTEN PARKWAY - WAL-MARTSTORES INC
160
If
J.
\
,l
'G) zt.J1,Q.?;L~;:' ..
,- ~-t../,~-~-")-v/.~' \I'l'
QYIZ8,:uA e..
:~;(:'\ ~ L"619~d N3J-l' \
,\~ . ~ ~M>f~NJJ,?~3.
,,,t~\
m'l' ,
'~EfN (J\, \~.)
~/ '\
\
\
P"1J
C));.
-~
~g
),......
~c)
I1j .
....1O....lJt
t..,lr1L.1O
!::iPP!\:.
~~&~
~~~~~G~~
&&~~&~qq
~s~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~&q&~~
"'I"''''''
!"';-.I!O!'l
~l~ ~.~
~e~~~~~~
~~~~~~~~
!>l
I ~ I;~
CIJ n.J' (\:,
(:) ~
~
~
.~~
~ ~-=~
,>.\J)~
:A1~
~J 0
." c.
-'~
:u 11",
".
~'2~
~
~
~, '.J
I"~
U
~.
~ Ii ~ ~
." ~
(lJ ~
I:> ~~~
~
~J ~ ~ ~
C) ~~ ~ ~ ~~~
~
~ ~ ~~~
..l>.: '<: ~ ~~~
l'oJ~ .'0 q
~~~ Ie ~~~
<0 ~~~
~~~ ",
~~~ ~ ~~~
..:l." ~~~
;:::~~ '0 tj
~~~ ~ ~ I~~
... ~
~~:to,; '" ~
~~~ .... ~ ~~~
~M I:::l ~~~
..~ <; ~ ~~~
~!) ': ~
~ ~
&:: .'<: ~~~
~ ~
'-. ~ ~ ~ ~
:<; ~ ~ tS
:.:
'"
~
"
~
&""'i
-
-
-- ~-
HAJJ c Q NORTH
[lJ
a
~
'"
"
a
~:
~~
/)..
"'''''''
~
~{
t;"i
~
""........ /~?
./ ~o.
.... ~
..,
"
x ~
~ ?k
P ~~
zlQ-l
o Vl
. d
m 1:)
I ''l
o ;n
-~~
....\;~
),.~....
:>!v ~~ "
x ~
-U r-
" I
::0",
g ~-
,- "
z -<
"
~ ~
'.
'i'
..,
oj
.......' C)
~- 1
'.JJ
'"
~
~
cJ d---~
03S0dO
__-M/cJ
-----..
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
~ ~
,) ~;
,.
~-; 3;::
p ~
"
?5 ~
~ ~~~
,1\.)0!1
::: ~Yl
Y'
I
/
/
~~
~<:
ii1i::~
1):b ~
Fl~
9~
""
/
\
i.
\ "~I
\
/
/
i
-:::
~
~
'"
\
\
;'
..
,
/
/"-
'"
~
, '
''-\
\
\
\
\
\
\
'1~2/."" - - - J
--,\ ~ ';'" ~~
~~ ~ "''.0 ~fi
f'\J ~ .....(', ~_
~g Q ............ (be
~Ci ~ '---, ~~
C) Q .........::tJ
~~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~
,.e__
~" ~~
\201
.~ ~.;:
:!
"O~8 "/
~~~~ \ ' "
\ i~~~__i___-_;:--,J\,------- ..---
~ ~ /' --1-- lO~~~ \ t)~
-,.-. ::r: \ ~~ro,5l- I ~~ ~
~ ~ ~~, \ ~?E U1 11 ll) tJ
~ ~;~ \ \ "lJ ~ I'li
;;:; :;;:~.., '-J'\ 0) i ~~ I\J CJ \)
~~~6A:-" \ g:~ ~ ~ ~
" ~ ~~~ S}L::t:' 0<=2
\~ ~~~ l ~ N
, . --.."'{)'~
i, ~ ~ ~
l--- - -- - Hl V3H )l:)V1a <::: ~ f::
\ (W~ .0;;) avO/:J ___---- '~
~_.-
\
\
61.
.....
-
TAKE NOTICE:
That on the 24th day of AUGUST 1994, at 7:00 p.m. or as soon thereafter as may be
heard, the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County at its regular meeting place in the Public
Meeting Room of Chesterfield County, Virginia, will consider the conveyance portions of right
of way located off Walmart Way, located in MID LOTHIAN District Chesterfield County.
A more particular description of the portions of right of way to be conveyed and further
information is on file in the office of the Right of Way Manager in Chesterfield County,
Virginia, and may be examined by all interested parties between the hours of 8:30 a.m. and 5:00
p.m., Monday through Friday.
-
-
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Page ---L of -1-
Meeting Date:
AUQ'Ust 24. 1994
Item Number:
l6.D.
Subject:
PUBLIC HEARING: Ordinance to Vacate a Portion of an 8 '
Easement across Lot 42, Arbor Landing Subdivision, Section 8
County Administrator's Comments:
County Administrator: ~~~~ .4- Li!J:L
Board Action Requested: Staff recommend/! that the Board of Supervisors
adopt an ordinance to vacate a portion of an 8' easement across lot 42
Arbor Landing Subdivision, Section 8.
Summary of Information:
Mr. Franklin E. Weigand, Jr., on behalf of Hayden Homes, has submitted an
application requesting the vacation of a portion of an 8' easement across
lot 42, Arbor Landing Subdivision, Section 8. The vacation of the
portion of easement is necessary in order to construct a dwelling on the
lot. In addition to this vacation, a special exception was granted since
the house will not meet the 20' horizontal distance off the flood plain.
Staff has reviewed this request and recommends approval.
District: Bermuda
preparer~/LJd 0'1"-<'>1
John W. Harmon
Title:
Riaht of Way Manaaer
Attachments:
.Yes DNO
1#
1.62
-
-
VICINITY SKETCH
PUBLIC HEARING: ORDINANCE TO VACATE A PORTION OF AN 8' EASEMENT
ACROSS LOT 42 ARBOR LANDING SUBDIVISION SECTION 8
FRANKLIN E WEIGAND JR/HAYDEN HOMES
j
1
J
1
I
~l
~, .
JOIl-
fDR
'i>'l!
;?
~ f""EDENSHIRE
i"'t
~
?f
163
J
-
'1''"''5 ,$ 1(' (p'!,f.,. t,.,.., &'" Icc""r,toe "e~ su'vev O' 'he D,..m,ses ,\I\Ow" ~(a'~()"" ....!. t~~1"': L'''''O'"''__r-, \Jon.' ,.,,, s""~''''t~lon ~"..1 eil ImO'Ovft"",,"I!lo ar"1j ....Isrt/le f'\I,o..nce Of
ea5>emt!n!s I'," 5"0...n r,""if'Of" i!InC ~"'.1 thft, e are t'l(; erlCfCachmt>n,s 0", 'mp,oy,,r"t!l"l'S ell"'''' "()fTl ACto.n'f'll$ ;J'"m'SP!I O' I,om SunlftCI D'e"''''~fl'5 om"" lr"l.", Sh{'l....... nfHf'H)r ~ "'lIS
'u'."ey ....J5 p.,tdO'I't'\ftO .....ttlOul the [)fin.", 01 a lillt! repor! an<115 Su[),@(110 ,,.,IOfmahO" ....1"\1(1"1 mlly be (:IlsCloSp~ by S,i.JC" ThIs dwelling ''5 ,n J:EUA de.one<] 1~Q('>c 10"" .____
/&/;50;17 f./
lD
C\J
"
&
~gZ'
..........
J..., 0 t 4-3 t
~
(\j
(\)
"
6)
B ~
'7. GO '1-0 5/~ 0-1=- ~
dr-bor J..of7-.l . ') I;":'
ctf-.-;-d. Wlre.or ~
~<J)
\U .(
(J),
G-..
g.<o
I... ~
Q.Q
Lor 4/
-
Vor./dldf-h
v.oOT l:Jro/n.,b;;mt
L"'45.0
,e-=355.QO'
· PLANNERS. ARCHITECTS. ENGINEERS. SURVEYORS.
501 Branchway Road . Suite 100. Richmond. Virginia 23236 . 794-0571 . Fax 794-2635
1514 East Parham Road. Richmond. Virginia 23228.262-6046. Fax 264-3037
eeFLBo-r IOrlff,,e;1Li
.00T 42, BecT/ON 8
Date:j-c/-34- _tje130e ALjNOING
Scale: /"=BO' Chesterfield County, virginia
Job No.: I~/ Ocr<1-3
1II€f'"\,.EC"'t"'-"C;. TO...-o"'Iq'OVlf'
1.64
-
~
TAKE NOTICE:
That on the 24th day of AUGUST 1994, at 7:00 p.m. or as soon thereafter as may be
heard, the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County at its regular meeting place in the Board
Room of Chesterfield County, Virginia, will consider the following ordinance for adoption:
AN ORDINANCE to vacate a portion of an 8' easement,
BERMUDA District, Chesterfield, Virginia, as shown on a plat
thereof by E. D. LEWIS & ASSOCIATES, P.C., dated JUNE 30,
1989, duly recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of
said County in Plat Book 65, Page 16.
The complete text of the proposed ordinance and conveyance is on file in the office of
the Right of Manager in Chesterfield County, Virginia, and may be examined by all interested
parties between the hours of 8:30 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday.
~-
_.
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Page -L of ---1-
Meeting Date:
Auaust 24. 1994
Item Number:
16.E.
Subject:
PUBLIC HEARING: Ordinance to Vacate a Portion of Harbour
Pointe Road within Land's End Subdivision
County Administrator's Comments:
County Administrator: ~~~ 1u-- ~
Board Action Requested: Staff recommendst{hat the Board of
adopt an ordinance to vacate a portion of Harbour pointe
Land's End Subdivision.
Supervisors
Road wi thin
Summary of Information:
The Chesterfield County Planning Commission has requested the vacation of
a portion of Harbour pointe Road within Land's End Subdivision. Staff
has reviewed the request and recommends approval.
District: Clover Hill
preparep#f}-J t?i2-~
John W. Harmon
Title:
Riaht of Way Manaaer
I- 165
Attachments:
. Yes DNO
-
-
PUBLIC
WITHIN
VACATE A PORTION OF HARBOUR
t
,
J
1
I
!
i
I
~
~
~Q"""/.
+
/,/
:If
166
"
-
I
o,oenre
.l..
~
\J
Ql
h
<()
C)
~
Cl
~
!'late' Q Cl?G> OC. o-f9'Den.
Sp::r= "("1",,-, d04pbr "Lanc:l.<ng
~o ae I'di:er> lor ad::liT/o,-,o /
ri9nr t:#f JL.IO'I.
Iv
4-
<()
~
()
i..
-l.
o
It)
5
I./-Llac.
4-<13.030'
_S5c!J~aeo.JU
Clover
;-1///
17/9/7
SCh 001
/
LAND 's
END
'. '~
- t ....~,;') lO l- -\ b-\: :_'t' ".
'L\
representative
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
PLANNING COMMISSION
/... 'f~, ,'~M
94TS0204 -I
167
....
......,
TAKE NOTICE:
That on the 24th day of AUGUST 1994, at 7 :00 p.m. or as soon thereafter as may be
heard, the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County at its regular meeting place in the Board
Room of Chesterfield County, Virginia, will consider the following ordinance for adoption:
AN ORDINANCE to vacate a portion of a 50' right of way known
as Harbour Pointe Road, Land's End Subdivision, CLOVER HILL
District, Chesterfield, Virginia, as shown on a plat dated
AUGUST 11, 1981, duly recorded in the Clerk's Office of the
Circuit Court of said County in Plat Book 39, Pages 53 & 54.
The complete text of the proposed ordinance and conveyance is on file in the office of
the Right of Manager in Chesterfield County, Virginia, and may be examined by all interested
parties between the hours of 8:30 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday.
g:\cSa\wp\irby\harbour.wp
1 L