2024-09-25 MinutesBOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES SEPTEMBER 25, 2024
09/25/2024 Page 1 of 63
A video recording of this meeting may be viewed at
https://www.chesterfield.gov/244/Agendas-and-Minutes.
Supervisors in Attendance:
Mr. James M. Holland, Chair
Dr. Mark S. Miller, Vice Chair
Mr. James A. Ingle, Jr.
Ms. Jessica L. Schneider
Mr. Kevin P. Carroll
Dr. Joseph P. Casey
County Administrator
Mr. Holland called the meeting to order at 2 p.m.
1. Approval of Minutes
On motion of Mr. Ingle, seconded by Ms. Schneider, the
Board approved the minutes of the August 28, 2024,
Board of Supervisors meeting, as submitted.
Ayes: Holland, Miller, Ingle, Schneider and Carroll.
Nays: None.
2. Requests to Postpone Agenda Items and Additions, Deletions or Changes in the Order of Presentation
There were no requests to postpone agenda items and
additions, deletions or changes in the order of
presentation.
3. Everyday Excellence - Constituent and Media Services
Mr. Dave Goode, Director of Constituent and Media
Services, introduced Ms. Crystal Dabney, Assistant
Constituent and FOIA Liaison, who was present to be
recognized for providing exceptional customer service.
He shared details of a complimentary voicemail message
Ms. Dabney received from a citizen who requested
assistance with litter pickup. He stated this was one
of many examples of Ms. Dabney's consistent practice
of providing outstanding customer service to the
county's residents.
Ms. Dabney expressed appreciation for the recognition
and shared her commitment to being respectful to and
understanding the needs of county residents who
contact her, thereby ensuring a positive interaction.
Board members expressed appreciation for Ms. Dabney's
professionalism and dedication to exemplary customer
service.
4. Work Sessions
A. Transportation Update
Ms. Chessa Walker, Director of Transportation,
provided the Board with a Transportation Update. She
09/25/2024 Page 2 of 63
stated updates from the Central Virginia
Transportation Authority (CVTA), Virginia Department
of Transportation (VDOT), and Greater Richmond Transit
Company (GRTC) would be forthcoming at a Board of
Supervisors meeting in the near future. She discussed
the process to develop infrastructure, which includes
identifying a transportation need, prioritizing
improvement projects, defining the project scope,
securing funding, performing preliminary engineering,
performing right-of-way tasks, and construction, all
resulting in a completed project. She provided details
of the various funding sources utilized based on
project type. She also provided an update on Smart
Scale and transportation projects. She reviewed agenda
items on the Board's Consent Agenda for the evening.
She provided an update on tolls on Powhite Parkway.
She discussed completed projects, including the Route
10 Superstreet, Route 10 (Whitepine to Frith)
Widening, Elkhardt Road and Bike/Ped Improvements,
Hopkins/Chippenham Park and Ride and Sidewalk, and
additional Hopkins Road area improvements. She
provided details of the Community Connectivity
Sidewalk Fund (CCSF) and related projects such as Deer
Run Road and Evergreen Parkway Sidewalks and Bon Air
Bike/Ped Improvements. She reviewed roundabout
projects which are either part of other larger
projects or standalone projects. She discussed
initiatives at Ettrick Train Station.
Discussion and questions ensued relative to the
information provided during the presentation.
B. Historical Recognition Plaques - Board of Supervisors
Update
Ms. Mary Romanello, Stegmaier Fellow, provided the
Board with an update on a project to install plaques
recognizing past and present members of the Board of
Supervisors and County Administrators in the Public
Meeting Room. She also gave a preview of the Board of
Supervisors web page containing images of and
information about Board members.
Discussion and questions ensued relative to the
information provided during the presentation.
C. Mental Health Support Services Update
Mr. Gib Sloan, Chair of the Community Services Board
(CSB), and Ms. Kelly Fried, Executive Director of the
CSB, provided the Board with an annual update. Mr.
Sloan asked CSB members in attendance to stand and be
recognized. He expressed appreciation to the Board for
its continued support. He shared an email written by
Ms. Fried summarizing the recent Commission on
Accreditation of Rehabilitation Facilities (CARF) re-
accreditation.
Ms. Fried asked members of her senior team in
attendance to stand and be recognized. She reviewed
Mental Health Support Services' (MHSS) mission and
provided statistics of individuals served in FY2024.
She provided details of FY2025 budgeted revenue. She
discussed FY2024 key highlights, including
09/25/2024 Page 3 of 63
implementation of Netsmart's NX Electronic Health
Record, National Association of Counties (NACo) awards
for suicide awareness and secondary traumatic stress,
peer services, problem gambling, housing partnerships,
and permanent supportive housing outcomes. She shared
a permanent supportive housing success story. She
announced September is Recovery Month and discussed
substance use trends. She provided the Board with an
update on Chesterfield Recovery Academy. She stated
September is also Suicide Awareness Month and shared
statistics of 5-Year Summary of Attempted and
Completed Suicide Numbers. She provided details of
Youth Mental Health initiatives and 988/Marcus Alert
Outcomes. She recognized many partners and thanked
them for their support.
Discussion and questions ensued relative to the
information provided during the presentation.
D. Consent Agenda Highlights
Mr. Matt Harris provided details of various consent
agenda items on the evening agenda.
5. Reports
A. Reports on the Status of District Improvement
Operating and Capital Funds, General Fund Unassigned
Balance and Debt Policy Ratios, and Investments
The Board approved the Reports on the Status of
District Improvement Operating and Capital Funds,
General Fund Unassigned Balance and Debt Policy
Ratios, and Investments.
6. Fifteen-Minute Citizen Comment Period on Unscheduled Matters
Mr. Herbert Loveless addressed the Board relative to
projected costs of Dominion's natural gas plant and
geothermal energy.
Mr. David Stritzinger expressed concerns relative to
interactions he had last month after he spoke at the
citizen comment period.
7. Closed Session
A. Closed Session 1) Pursuant to § 2.2-3711(A)(5), Code
of Virginia, 1950, as Amended, to Discuss or Consider
Prospective Businesses or Industries or the Expansion
of Existing Businesses or Industries Where no Previous
Announcement Has Been Made of the Businesses’ or
Industries’ Interest in Locating or Expanding Their
Facilities in the Community, 2) Pursuant to § 2.2-
3711(A)(3), Code of Virginia, 1950, as Amended, to
Discuss the Acquisition by the County of Real Estate
for a Public Purpose, or the Disposition of Publicly
Held Real Property, Where Discussion in an Open
Meeting Would Adversely Affect the Bargaining Position
and Negotiating Strategy of the Public Body, 3)
Pursuant to § 2.2-3711(A)(29) to Discuss the Award of
a Public Contract Involving the Expenditure of Public
Funds Where Discussion in Open Session Would Adversely
09/25/2024 Page 4 of 63
Affect the Bargaining Position or Negotiating Strategy
of the Public Body, 4) Pursuant to § 2.2-3711(A)(1),
Code of Virginia, 1950, as Amended, Relating to the
Performance of the County Administrator and County
Attorney, and 5) Pursuant to § 2.2-3711 (A)(1), Code
of Virginia, 1950, as Amended, for Discussion and
Consideration of Prospective Candidates for Employment
for the Position of Chief of Police
On motion of Dr. Miller, seconded by Ms. Schneider,
the Board went into Closed Session 1) Pursuant to §
2.2-3711(A)(5), Code of Virginia, 1950, as Amended, to
Discuss or Consider Prospective Businesses or
Industries or the Expansion of Existing Businesses or
Industries Where no Previous Announcement Has Been
Made of the Businesses’ or Industries’ Interest in
Locating or Expanding Their Facilities in the
Community, 2) Pursuant to § 2.2-3711(A)(3), Code of
Virginia, 1950, as Amended, to Discuss the Acquisition
by the County of Real Estate for a Public Purpose, or
the Disposition of Publicly Held Real Property, Where
Discussion in an Open Meeting Would Adversely Affect
the Bargaining Position and Negotiating Strategy of
the Public Body, 3) Pursuant to § 2.2-3711(A)(29) to
Discuss the Award of a Public Contract Involving the
Expenditure of Public Funds Where Discussion in Open
Session Would Adversely Affect the Bargaining Position
or Negotiating Strategy of the Public Body, 4)
Pursuant to § 2.2-3711(A)(1), Code of Virginia, 1950,
as Amended, Relating to the Performance of the County
Administrator and County Attorney, and 5) Pursuant to
§ 2.2-3711 (A)(1), Code of Virginia, 1950, as Amended,
for Discussion and Consideration of Prospective
Candidates for Employment for the Position of Chief of
Police.
Ayes: Holland, Miller, Ingle, Schneider and Carroll.
Nays: None.
Reconvening:
On motion of Ms. Schneider, seconded by Mr. Holland,
the Board adopted the following resolution:
WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors has this day
adjourned into Closed Session in accordance with a
formal vote of the Board and in accordance with the
provisions of the Virginia Freedom of Information Act;
and
WHEREAS, the Virginia Freedom of Information Act
effective July 1, 1989 provides for certification that
such Closed Session was conducted in conformity with
law.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, the Board of
Supervisors does hereby certify that to the best of
each member’s knowledge, i) only public business
matters lawfully exempted from open meeting
requirements under the Freedom of Information Act were
discussed in Closed Session to which this
certification applies, and ii) only such business
matters were identified in the motion by which the
09/25/2024 Page 5 of 63
Closed Session was convened were heard, discussed or
considered by the Board. No member dissents from this
certification.
Mr. Ingle: Aye.
Ms. Schneider: Aye.
Mr. Carroll: Aye.
Dr. Miller: Aye.
Mr. Holland: Aye.
8. Recess for Dinner with the Community Services Board
On motion of Mr. Carroll, seconded by Dr. Miller, the
Board recessed for dinner with the Community Services
Board in Room 502.
Ayes: Holland, Miller, Ingle, Schneider and Carroll.
Nays: None.
9. Invocation by the Honorable Jessica L. Schneider, Clover Hill District Supervisor
The Honorable Jessica L. Schneider, Clover Hill
District Supervisor, gave the invocation.
10. Pledge of Allegiance Led by Matt Harris, Deputy County Administrator
Deputy County Administrator Matt Harris led the Pledge
of Allegiance.
11. County Administration Update
The County Administration Update consisted of the
following:
• An update provided by Chelsea Buyalos, Executive
Director of the Perkinson Center for the Arts and
Education;
• Recognition of Dalila Medrano, Multi-cultural
Engagement Coordinator, for being recognized at
Festival Salvadoreño held by Coco-Sal RVA for her
valuable contributions to the Salvadoran
community;
• Recognition of Stephanie Brown, Director of
Procurement, for being one of three finalists for
the National Institute of Governmental
Purchasing's 2024 Procurement Manager of the Year
Award;
• An update provided by Dr. Casey on the Police
Chief Recommendation Committee; and
• An update provided by Rachel Ramirez, Executive
Director of the Lifelong Learning Institute.
12. Board Member Reports
Board members announced and provided details of
several community meetings and county-related events
they attended recently.
13. Resolutions and Special Recognitions
09/25/2024 Page 6 of 63
A. Recognition of Chesterfield County Centenarians in
Honor of National Centenarian Day
The Board recognized the following Centenarians who
will be 100 years of age or older in 2024:
• Robert Brown, Bermuda
• Alfred “Happy” Hunter, Bermuda
• Gladys Kelly, Bermuda
• Eva Mowen, Bermuda*
• Norma Schott, Bermuda
• Arlene Stanton, Bermuda*
• Phillip White, Bermuda
• Anita DiGiacomo, Clover Hill*
• William May, Clover Hill*
• Frances Rogers, Clover Hill*
• Lee Beale, Dale*
• Margaret Brennan, Dale
• Anna Marie Browder Snelling, Dale
• Julia Mayfield, Matoaca
• Maria Thomas, Matoaca*
• Mary Elizabeth Dunn Gaskill, Midlothian
• Sarah Harrison, Midlothian*
• Mary Hollyday, Midlothian*
*These Centenarians were present to receive the
recognition.
B. Recognition of Plant the Moon Challenge Winners
Ms. Dot Heffron, Chair of the School Board, introduced
Ms. Belinda Henriques and several of her students, who
are part of Meadowbrook High School's Team YAPPERS.
Also present were Dale District School Board
Representative Dominique Chatters, Interim
Superintendent Dr. John Murray, and Principal Dr.
Craig Reed. Ms. Heffron provided details of the team's
participation in the Plant the Moon Challenge, which
is a global science experiment to investigate how
vegetables might grow on the moon or on Mars. She
stated in the spring of 2024, Meadowbrook High School
achieved the best crop growth of any high school team
in the world. She further stated NASA will use data
from the challenge when Americans return to the moon.
Board members congratulated Ms. Henriques, Team
YAPPERS, and Meadowbrook High School for excellence in
teaching and learning through the Plant the Moon
Challenge.
C. Recognition of 2024 Virginia Association of Counties
Achievement Award Winners
Mr. Dean Lynch, Executive Director of the Virginia
Association of Counties (VACo), presented five
achievement awards earned by the county.
• On behalf of Community Engagement and Resources,
Ms. Dalila Medrano and Ms. Jackie Carter accepted
the award for "Enhancing Access to Citizens".
09/25/2024 Page 7 of 63
• On behalf of the Sheriff's Office, Ms. Kerri
Rhodes accepted the award for "I Never Thought It
Would Be Me".
• On behalf of Mental Health Support Services, Ms.
Kelly Fried accepted the award for "Secondary
Traumatic Stress Breakthrough Series".
• On behalf of Schools, Dr. Belinda Merriman
accepted the award for "Student Equity with
College Access Tools".
• On behalf of General Services, Mr. John Neal and
Mr. Jason Stone accepted the award for "Workplace
Violence Prevention and Intervention Program".
Board members congratulated the award recipients and
thanked them for being the personification of
excellence.
14. New Business
A. Appointments
1. GRTC Transit System Board of Directors
On motion of Dr. Miller, seconded by Mr. Carroll, the
Board nominated and reappointed Mr. Jim Ingle, Ms.
Barbara Smith, and Mr. Dave Anderson to serve on the
GRTC Board of Directors, whose terms are effective
October 21, 2024, and expire October 20, 2025.
And, further, the Board authorized the County
Administrator or his designee to appear at the annual
meeting and vote on behalf of the county for the GRTC
Directors appointed by the Chesterfield County Board
of Supervisors, by the Richmond City Council, and by
the Henrico County Board of Supervisors.
Ayes: Holland, Miller, Ingle, Schneider and Carroll.
Nays: None.
2. Health Center Commission (HCC) for the County of
Chesterfield
On motion of Mr. Ingle, seconded by Dr. Miller, the
Board nominated and appointed Ms. Jene Wood (Clover
Hill district) to serve as an at-large representative
on the Health Center Commission for the County of
Chesterfield, whose term is effective immediately and
will expire June 30, 2027.
Ayes: Holland, Miller, Ingle, Schneider and Carroll.
Nays: None.
B. Consent Items (14.B.1. - 14.B.12.)
1. Adoption of Resolutions
a. Resolution Recognizing Corporal Eric M.
Becker, Police Department, Upon His
Retirement
On motion of Ms. Schneider, seconded by Dr. Miller,
the Board adopted the following resolution:
09/25/2024 Page 8 of 63
WHEREAS, Corporal Eric M. Becker retired from the
Chesterfield County Police Department on October 1,
2024, after providing over 25 years of quality service
to the residents of Chesterfield County; and
WHEREAS, Corporal Becker began his career with the
Chesterfield Police Department as a Police Officer and
faithfully served the county as a Police Officer,
Senior Police Officer, Master Police Officer, Career
Police Officer and Corporal; and
WHEREAS, Corporal Becker also served during his tenure
as a School Resource Officer, Firearms Instructor,
DUI/DUID Instructor, General Instructor, UOB Evidence
Technician, and Bike Patrol Officer; and
WHEREAS, Corporal Becker earned a Life-Saving Award
for actions he took when assisting other units at the
scene of a vehicle that had left the roadway, striking
a tree and pinning the doors partially closed which
left passengers trapped, he and several others were
able to open the passenger door, cut seatbelts off of
the trapped occupants and remove them from the vehicle
before it became fully engulfed in flames; and
WHEREAS, Corporal Becker was presented with an
Achievement Award for actions he took while working
off duty when he responded to a robbery in progress of
a nearby business after being notified by an employee
who had been able to escape, confronting the robber
exiting the back of the building and apprehending him,
resulting in a full confession and the money returned
to the business; and
WHEREAS, Corporal Becker was presented with an
Achievement Award for assisting Training Staff with
navigating and managing the schedule for mandatory and
significant training events and basic academy classes,
despite the COVID-19 Pandemic, ensuring that
approximately 150 officers who were unable to attend
in-person were able to receive the training in a
remote format and all required in-person training was
rescheduled to have the least impact on patrol
manpower, assisting with the redesign of the LawFit
obstacle course to meet adjusted health protocols,
ensuring annual mandatory firearms qualifications
could be performed for Chesterfield County Police
Department and neighboring departments, overall
resulting in the department not having to request any
training extensions due to the pandemic and no
employee contracting COVID-19 as a result of a
training event; and
WHEREAS, Corporal Becker consistently assisted Fire
and EMS when on patrol, allowing them to provide
better aid to those in need and in the community; and
WHEREAS, Corporal Becker utilized his strong
interpersonal skills, nurturing the bright minds of
those in his school, strengthening the relationship
between Chesterfield Police Department and
Chesterfield County Public Schools, and maintaining a
09/25/2024 Page 9 of 63
positive attitude and approachable demeanor; and
WHEREAS, Corporal Becker was repeatedly recognized for
his active participation in voluntary school and
department events and routinely adjusting his schedule
to accommodate the needs of school and department
staff; and
WHEREAS, Corporal Becker is recognized for his strong
work ethic, punctuality, thorough investigation
skills, his teamwork, communication, and human
relations skills, all of which he has utilized within
the Police Department and in assisting residents of
Chesterfield County during his career; and
WHEREAS, Corporal Becker has received numerous letters
of commendation, thanks and appreciation from
supervisors and residents for services rendered; and
WHEREAS, Corporal Becker has provided the Chesterfield
County Police Department with many years of loyal and
dedicated service; and
WHEREAS, Chesterfield County and the Board of
Supervisors will miss Corporal Becker’s diligent
service.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chesterfield
County Board of Supervisors recognizes Corporal Eric
M. Becker and extends on behalf of its members and the
residents of Chesterfield County, appreciation for his
service to the county, congratulations upon his
retirement, and best wishes for a long and happy
retirement.
Ayes: Holland, Miller, Ingle, Schneider and Carroll.
Nays: None.
b. Resolution Recognizing Master Officer Joseph
M. Redmon, Police Department, Upon His
Retirement
On motion of Ms. Schneider, seconded by Dr. Miller,
the Board adopted the following resolution:
WHEREAS, Master Officer Joseph M. Redmon will retire
from the Chesterfield County Police Department on
October 1, 2024 after providing nearly 22 years of
quality service to the residents of Chesterfield
County; and
WHEREAS, Master Officer Redmon began his career with
the Chesterfield Police Department as a Pre-Certified
Officer in 2002 and continued to serve as a Police
Officer, Senior Police Officer, Career Police Officer
and Master Police Officer; and
WHEREAS, Master Officer Redmon also served during his
tenure for seven years as a School Resource Officer,
was a member of the Special Response Unit and was
trained as a patrol rifle operator; and
WHEREAS, Master Officer Redmon was recognized in a
09/25/2024 Page 10 of 63
letter by Grange Hall Elementary School
representatives who expressed their appreciation to
him for responding while he was off duty to an
electrical fire at the school and taking control of
the scene by directing traffic and providing
instructions and support to students and parents of
students at the school; and
WHEREAS, Master Officer Redmon was an operator and
instructor for Project Lifesaver, a program
established to save lives and reduce potential injury
for adults and children who wander due to Alzheimer’s,
Autism, Dementia and other related disorders; and
WHEREAS, Master Officer Redmon spent time during his
off duty hours volunteering at the Chesterfield County
Youth Academy to reach out to children to allow them
to see “beyond the uniform” in their daily
interactions; and
WHEREAS, Master Officer Redmon is recognized for his
teamwork and his communications and human relations
skills, all of which he has utilized within the Police
Department and in assisting residents of Chesterfield
County during his career; and
WHEREAS, Master Officer Redmon has provided the
Chesterfield County Police Department with many years
of loyal and dedicated service; and
WHEREAS, Chesterfield County and the Board of
Supervisors will miss Master Officer Redmon's diligent
service.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chesterfield
County Board of Supervisors recognizes Master Officer
Joseph M. Redmon and extends on behalf of its members
and the residents of Chesterfield County, appreciation
for his service to the county, congratulations upon
his retirement, and best wishes for a long and happy
retirement.
Ayes: Holland, Miller, Ingle, Schneider and Carroll.
Nays: None.
c. Resolution Recognizing Corporal Brian S.
Bailey, Police Department, Upon His
Retirement
On motion of Ms. Schneider, seconded by Dr. Miller,
the Board adopted the following resolution:
WHEREAS, Corporal Brian S. Bailey will retire from the
Chesterfield County Police Department on October 1,
2024 after providing over 33 years of quality service
to the residents of Chesterfield County; and
WHEREAS, Corporal Bailey began his career with
Chesterfield County in 1990 with the Maintenance and
Logistics section of the Fire Department joining the
Police Department as a Recruit in 1996 and faithfully
served as a Police Officer Senior Police Officer,
Master Police Officer, Career Police Officer,
09/25/2024 Page 11 of 63
achieving the rank of Corporal in 2011; and
WHEREAS, Corporal Bailey also served during his tenure
as a Field Training Officer, Hostage Negotiator,
Marine Patrol Officer, Drug Court Officer,
Breathalyzer Operator, and was a dedicated School
Resource Officer for over 14 years; and
WHEREAS, Corporal Bailey earned a Life Saving Award
for his effort to deliver CPR to a male who had
collapsed at a local convenience store thereby
stabilizing him and received a Rescue Certificate for
following up on the male victim’s female companion who
was passed out in her vehicle at the same location,
recognizing that she was in an overdose situation and
administering two separate doses of Narcan to revive
her as Fire and EMS arrived; and
WHEREAS, Corporal Bailey was presented with a Unit
Citation recognizing his contribution to the success
of the SWAT and Hostage Negotiation Teams over a 10-
year period, responding to over 150 high-risk and
barricade situations, rescuing over sixty-five people
and achieving state and national recognition for the
negotiation team’s unique partnership and working
relationship with the Chesterfield County Mental
Health Department; and
WHEREAS, Corporal Bailey received two Unit Citations
for the dedication, attention to detail and high
volume of work the School Resource Officers
consistently achieved while serving at their various
schools; and
WHEREAS, Corporal Bailey was a certified responder for
Project Lifesaver, a program established to save lives
and reduce potential injury for adults and children
who wander due to Alzheimer’s, Autism, Dementia and
other related disorders; and
WHEREAS, Corporal Bailey was often cited by his
supervisors while serving as a School Resource Officer
for being a positive role model who has excelled at
developing relationships with students as someone they
can look up to and trust; and
WHEREAS, Corporal Bailey is recognized for his strong
work ethic, his teamwork and his communications and
human relations skills, all of which he has utilized
within the Police Department and in assisting
residents of Chesterfield County during his career;
and
WHEREAS, Corporal Bailey has received numerous letters
of commendation, thanks and appreciation from
supervisors and residents for services rendered; and
WHEREAS, Corporal Bailey has provided the Chesterfield
County Police Department with many years of loyal and
dedicated service; and
WHEREAS, Chesterfield County and the Board of
Supervisors will miss Corporal Bailey's diligent
09/25/2024 Page 12 of 63
service.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chesterfield
County Board of Supervisors recognizes Corporal Brian
S. Bailey and extends on behalf of its members and the
residents of Chesterfield County, appreciation for his
service to the county, congratulations upon his
retirement, and best wishes for a long and happy
retirement.
Ayes: Holland, Miller, Ingle, Schneider and Carroll.
Nays: None.
d. Resolution Recognizing the Chesterfield
Chamber of Commerce on its 25th Anniversary
On motion of Ms. Schneider, seconded by Dr. Miller,
the Board adopted the following resolution:
WHEREAS, the Chesterfield County Chamber of Commerce,
organized in 1999, is celebrating its 25th year of
service to the businesses and communities of
Chesterfield County; and
WHEREAS, one of the county’s strategic goals is to
have a vibrant economy that includes economic
opportunities, business and visitation, quality jobs,
and diverse business; and
WHEREAS, the county’s businesses provide needed goods
and services, employment opportunities, a tax base
that helps maintain the county’s extraordinary quality
of life, and more; and
WHEREAS, the Chamber is dedicated to creating and
supporting the entire business community to build a
foundation that forms a healthy, successful and
vibrant county; and
WHEREAS, the Chamber’s mission is accomplished with
advocacy, education, exposure to evolving industry
standards and meaningful engagement; and
WHEREAS, the Chamber endeavors to improve the ability
of its members to succeed and has conducted such
things as classes and other learning opportunities to
enable chamber members to interact with the county’s
diverse populations; and
WHEREAS, the Chamber regularly hosts a variety of
networking events that provide its members with
opportunities to share ideas and resources and to
learn from each other in order to be mutually
successful; and
WHEREAS, in these ways and others, the Chamber is a
strong voice and advocate for business and a link
between businesses and the community; and
WHEREAS, the Chamber has partnered with neighboring
chambers and military units to promote regional
efforts aimed at helping local businesses and military
bases; and
09/25/2024 Page 13 of 63
WHEREAS, the Chamber now has more than 1,359
businesses as members, and includes solopreneurs and
small, medium and large businesses located in the
area.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chesterfield
County Board of Supervisors recognizes The
Chesterfield Chamber of Commerce upon it 25th
anniversary and extends on behalf of its members and
the citizens of Chesterfield County appreciation for
the valuable work it performs for the betterment of
Chesterfield businesses and the community.
Ayes: Holland, Miller, Ingle, Schneider and Carroll.
Nays: None.
2. Real Property Requests
a. Acceptance of Parcels of Land
1. Acceptance of Parcels of Land Adjacent
to Genito Road from FC Richmond
On motion of Ms. Schneider, seconded by Dr. Miller,
the Board accepted the conveyance of two parcels of
land containing a total of 0.422 acres adjacent to
Genito Road from FC Richmond and authorized the County
Administrator to execute the deed.
Ayes: Holland, Miller, Ingle, Schneider and Carroll.
Nays: None.
2. Acceptance of a Parcel of Land Adjacent
to Bermuda Hundred Road from CRDR
Management Meadowville LLC
On motion of Ms. Schneider, seconded by Dr. Miller,
the Board accepted the conveyance of a parcel of land
containing 0.026 acres adjacent to Bermuda Hundred
Road from CRDR Management Meadowville LLC and
authorized the County Administrator to execute the
deed.
Ayes: Holland, Miller, Ingle, Schneider and Carroll.
Nays: None.
3. Acceptance of a Parcel of Land Adjacent
to Midlothian Turnpike from PTM LP
On motion of Ms. Schneider, seconded by Dr. Miller,
the Board accepted the conveyance of a parcel of land
containing 0.018 acres adjacent to Midlothian Turnpike
from PTM LP and authorized the County Administrator to
execute the deed.
Ayes: Holland, Miller, Ingle, Schneider and Carroll.
Nays: None.
4. Acceptance of Parcels of Land Adjacent
to Old Bermuda Hundred Road and
Ramblewood Road from SSD Investments
LLC
09/25/2024 Page 14 of 63
On motion of Ms. Schneider, seconded by Dr. Miller,
the Board accepted the conveyance of two parcels of
land containing a total of 0.97 acres adjacent to Old
Bermuda Hundred Road and Ramblewood Road from SSD
Investments LLC and authorized the County
Administrator to execute the deed.
Ayes: Holland, Miller, Ingle, Schneider and Carroll.
Nays: None.
b. Conveyance of Easements
1. Designation of a Parcel of Land for
Cosby High School
On motion of Ms. Schneider, seconded by Dr. Miller,
the Board designated a parcel of land containing 0.059
acres as public right of way for Cosby High School.
Ayes: Holland, Miller, Ingle, Schneider and Carroll.
Nays: None.
c. Requests for Permission
1. Request Permission to Allow a Proposed
Private Water Service Within an
Existing Private Water Easement to
Serve the Property at 3820 Old Gun Road
West
On motion of Ms. Schneider, seconded by Dr. Miller,
the Board granted permission to allow a proposed
private water service within an existing private water
easement to serve property at 3820 Old Gun Road West
and authorized the County Administrator to execute the
water connection agreement.
Ayes: Holland, Miller, Ingle, Schneider and Carroll.
Nays: None.
2. Request Permission to Allow an Existing
Private Water Service Within a Proposed
Private Water Easement to Serve the
Property at 8700 Dorsey Road
On motion of Ms. Schneider, seconded by Dr. Miller,
the Board granted permission to allow an existing
private water service within a new private water
easement to serve property at 8700 Dorsey Road and
authorized the County Administrator to execute the
water connection agreement.
Ayes: Holland, Miller, Ingle, Schneider and Carroll.
Nays: None.
d. Requests to Quitclaim
1. Request to Quitclaim a Portion of a
Sewer Easement Across the Property
Owned by Old Hundred Trace Va LLC
On motion of Ms. Schneider, seconded by Dr. Miller,
the Board authorized the Chairman of the Board of
09/25/2024 Page 15 of 63
Supervisors and the County Administrator to execute a
quitclaim deed to quitclaim a portion of a sewer
easement across the property owned by Old Hundred
Trace Va LLC.
Ayes: Holland, Miller, Ingle, Schneider and Carroll.
Nays: None.
3. Accept and Appropriate Grant Funds from the
Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) and
Virginia Department of Aviation (DOAV) for the
Design of the Chesterfield County Airport Runway
Extension Project
On motion of Ms. Schneider, seconded by Dr. Miller,
the Board accepted and appropriated grant funds from
the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) and Virginia
Department of Aviation (DOAV) for the design of the
Chesterfield County Airport Runway Extension Project.
Ayes: Holland, Miller, Ingle, Schneider and Carroll.
Nays: None.
4. Authorization to Proceed with Design-Build
Procurement for the Otterdale Road at Swift Creek
Drainage Project
On motion of Ms. Schneider, seconded by Dr. Miller,
the Board authorized staff to proceed with the use of
design-build procurement for the Otterdale Road at
Swift Creek Drainage Project.
Ayes: Holland, Miller, Ingle, Schneider and Carroll.
Nays: None.
5. Authorization to Proceed with Cosby High School
Access Improvements
On motion of Ms. Schneider, seconded by Dr. Miller,
the Board authorized staff to proceed with the Cosby
High School Access Improvements.
Ayes: Holland, Miller, Ingle, Schneider and Carroll.
Nays: None.
6. Approval of Amendment of the Route 1 Incentive
Policy
On motion of Ms. Schneider, seconded by Dr. Miller,
the Board approved an amendment to the Route 1
Incentive Policy permitting submittal of a plan of
development by December 31, 2024.
Ayes: Holland, Miller, Ingle, Schneider and Carroll.
Nays: None.
7. Adoption of the 2025 Legislative Program
On motion of Ms. Schneider, seconded by Dr. Miller,
the Board adopted the 2025 Legislative Program.
Ayes: Holland, Miller, Ingle, Schneider and Carroll.
Nays: None.
8. Authorize the CSB to Create Four Full-Time
09/25/2024 Page 16 of 63
Positions in the Permanent Supportive Housing
Program through Funding as Part of the FY25
Performance Contract from the Virginia Department
of Behavioral Health & Developmental Services
On motion of Ms. Schneider, seconded by Dr. Miller,
the Board approved the creation of four full-time,
fully-funded positions in the Permanent Supportive
Housing program to support unmet needs of providing
wrap-around services to individuals with Serious
Mental Illness.
Ayes: Holland, Miller, Ingle, Schneider and Carroll.
Nays: None.
9. Set Public Hearing
a. To Consider Continuation of Lease of
Henricus Historical Park with the Henricus
Foundation
On motion of Ms. Schneider, seconded by Dr. Miller,
the Board set October 30, 2024, as the date to hold a
public hearing to consider continuation of a lease of
Henricus Historical Park with the Henricus Foundation.
Ayes: Holland, Miller, Ingle, Schneider and Carroll.
Nays: None.
b. To Consider a Lease of County Property
Adjacent to the Meadowville Wastewater Pump
Station at 1398 Bermuda Hundred Road
On motion of Ms. Schneider, seconded by Dr. Miller,
the Board set October 30, 2024, as the date to hold a
public hearing to consider the lease of county
property adjacent to the Meadowville Wastewater Pump
Station at 1398 Bermuda Hundred Road to American
Tower.
Ayes: Holland, Miller, Ingle, Schneider and Carroll.
Nays: None.
c. To Consider Code Amendment Relative to
Chesapeake Bay Preservation Areas (Mature
Trees and Climate Resilience)
On motion of Ms. Schneider, seconded by Dr. Miller,
the Board set October 30, 2024, as the date to hold a
public hearing to consider a code amendment relative
to Chesapeake Bay Preservation Areas (Mature Trees and
Climate Resilience).
Ayes: Holland, Miller, Ingle, Schneider and Carroll.
Nays: None.
d. To Consider Code Amendment Relative to
Public Notice
On motion of Ms. Schneider, seconded by Dr. Miller,
the Board set October 30, 2024, as the date to hold a
public hearing to consider a code amendment relative
to public notice.
09/25/2024 Page 17 of 63
Ayes: Holland, Miller, Ingle, Schneider and Carroll.
Nays: None.
e. To Consider Code Amendment Relative to
Vested Rights and Nonconforming Uses
On motion of Ms. Schneider, seconded by Dr. Miller,
the Board set October 30, 2024, as the date to hold a
public hearing to consider a code amendment relative
to vested rights and nonconforming uses.
Ayes: Holland, Miller, Ingle, Schneider and Carroll.
Nays: None.
10. Acceptance of State Roads
On motion of Ms. Schneider, seconded by Dr. Miller,
the Board adopted the following resolution:
WHEREAS, the streets described below are shown on a
plat recorded in the Clerk’s Office of the Circuit
Court of Chesterfield County; and
WHEREAS, the Resident Engineer for the Virginia
Department of Transportation has advised this Board
the streets meet the requirements established by the
Subdivision Street Requirements of the Virginia
Department of Transportation.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that this Board
requests the Virginia Department of Transportation to
add the streets described below to the secondary
system of state highways, pursuant to Sections 33.2-
705 and 33.2-334, Code of Virginia, and the
Department’s Subdivision Street Requirements.
AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that this Board
guarantees a clear and unrestricted right-of-way, as
described, and any necessary easements for cuts, fills
and drainage.
AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that a certified copy of
this resolution be forwarded to the Resident Engineer
for the Virginia Department of Transportation.
Project / Subdivision: Greenwich Walk at Fox Creek Phase 4 Type Change to the Secondary System of State Highways: Addition Reason for Change: New Streets Pursuant to Code of Virginia Statutes: §33.2-705, 33.2-334
Street Name and/or Route Number
► Hallowell Ridge, State Route Number 8196
From: Citory Way, (Route 8590)
To: 0.01 miles east of Citory Way, (Route 8590), a
distance of 0.01 miles
Recordation Reference: Plat Book 275, Page 2
Right of Way width (feet) = 43
09/25/2024 Page 18 of 63
► Hallowell Ridge, State Route Number, 8196
From: Citory Way, (Route 8590)
To: 0.05 miles west of Citory Way, (Route 8590), a
distance of 0.05 miles
Recordation Reference: Plat Book 275, Page 2
Right of Way width (feet) = 43
► Citory Way, State Route Number 8590
From: Lewisham Drive, (Route 8194)
To: Hallowell Ridge, (Route 8196), a distance of 0.20
miles
Recordation Reference: Plat Book 275, Page 2
Right of Way width (feet) = 43
Ayes: Holland, Miller, Ingle, Schneider and Carroll.
Nays: None.
11. Approval of a Contract for the Purchase and
Installation of Diesel Exhaust Extraction Systems
to Applied Resource Technologies, LLC for Fire
and EMS Stations
On motion of Ms. Schneider, seconded by Dr. Miller,
the Board approved and authorized the Procurement
Director to execute a contract and all necessary
change orders up to the amount budgeted to Applied
Resource Technologies, LLC, for the purchase and
installation of diesel exhaust extraction systems for
Chesterfield County Fire & EMS stations.
Ayes: Holland, Miller, Ingle, Schneider and Carroll.
Nays: None.
12. Approval of the Purchase of a Parcel of Land for
the Lake Dale Emergency Communications Tower
On motion of Ms. Schneider, seconded by Dr. Miller,
the Board approved the purchase of a parcel of land
containing 28 acres, more or less, from Shoosmith
Bros., Inc. for the Lake Dale Emergency Communications
Tower.
Ayes: Holland, Miller, Ingle, Schneider and Carroll.
Nays: None.
15. Fifteen-Minute Citizen Comment Period on Unscheduled Matters
Ms. Courtney Bernhardt expressed concerns relative to
the Chesterfield Energy Reliability Center and the
types and amounts of emissions from the plant.
Mr. Glen Besa expressed concerns relative to Dominion
Energy receiving preferential treatment and requested
a hearing on the zoning and suitability of the site.
Mr. Christian Martinez Lemus expressed concerns
relative to the Dominion Energy plant, potential
increases in electric bills, high risk from pollution,
and how the project contradicts Virginia's clean
energy laws.
09/25/2024 Page 19 of 63
Mr. Danny Castillo expressed concerns relative to
energy spikes, AI (artificial intelligence) queries,
data centers, and big tech.
16. Deferred Items from Previous Meetings
There were no deferred items from previous meetings.
17. Zoning Cases
A. Withdrawals
There were no withdrawals.
B. Deferrals
1. 23SN0041 - North Hallsley - Midlothian
In Midlothian Magisterial District, North Hallsley is
a request to rezone from Residential Townhouse (R-TH)
to Residential (R-15) on property fronting the west
side of Old Hundred Road north of Scottwood Road, also
fronting east and west sides of Scottwood Road, as
well as fronting the eastern terminus of Allsdell
Road, Brightwalton Road, Dunleer Way, Saville Chase
Road, and Saville Chase Trail. The 301.96-acre
property is proposed for a maximum development of 340
dwelling units.
Ms. Wilson introduced Case 23SN0041. She stated Dr.
Miller is requesting deferral to the Board's October
30, 2024, public hearing.
Mr. Holland called for public comment on the deferral.
Ms. Patty Friedman stated she supports North Hallsley.
She asked the Board to start preparing the
infrastructure to be able to support these kinds of
neighborhoods.
There being no one else to speak to the issue, the
public hearing on the deferral was closed.
On motion of Dr. Miller, seconded by Mr. Carroll, the
Board deferred Case 23SN0041 to its regularly
scheduled Board of Supervisors meeting on October 30,
2024.
Ayes: Holland, Miller, Ingle, Schneider and Carroll.
Nays: None.
C. Consent Cases
1. 23SN0062 - Caliber Collision Boulders -
Midlothian
In Midlothian Magisterial District, Caliber Collision
Boulders is a request for conditional use to permit
automobile repair (including body, major engine, or
transmission) plus conditional use planned development
to permit exceptions to ordinance requirements and
amendment of zoning district map in General Business
(C-5) District on 4.27 acres known as 7522 Midlothian
09/25/2024 Page 20 of 63
Turnpike. Density will be controlled by zoning
conditions or ordinance standards. The Comprehensive
Plan suggests the property is appropriate for
Community Business use. Tax ID 762-707-5631.
Ms. Wilson introduced Case 23SN0062. She stated the
Planning Commission and staff recommended approval,
subject to the conditions in the staff report.
Mr. Holland called for public comment.
There being no one to speak to the issue, the public
hearing was closed.
On motion of Dr. Miller, seconded by Mr. Carroll, the
Board approved Case 23SN0062, subject to the following
conditions:
Conditions
1. The Property shall be designed in general
conformance with Exhibit A, Conceptual Site Plan
entitled “Caliber Collision” dated May 17, 2023, last
revised August 1, 2024, prepared and submitted by Bret
Flory of Cross Architects, PLLC., as well as the
Textual Statement dated 8/2/2024. (P)
2. Within 90 days of approval, the Applicant shall
enhance the landscaping along Midlothian Turnpike to
Landscape C, as defined in the Ordinance. The enhanced
landscaping along Midlothian Turnpike will be
coordinated with the future sidewalk project and the
exact location will be determined at the time of final
site plan approval. (P)
3. Within 90 days of approval, the Applicant shall
enhance the landscaping along Boulders Parkway to two
(2) times Landscape C, including the architectural
features as detailed on Exhibit A. (P)
4. Within ninety (90) days of approval, the
Applicant shall replace the existing wooden fence
located along the northern property line with a new
pressure treated wooden privacy fence that is six (6)
feet in height. (P)
5. No inoperable vehicle or vehicle awaiting repair
shall be located on any portion of the Property that
is visible from any public right of way. (CE)
Ayes: Holland, Miller, Ingle, Schneider and Carroll.
Nays: None.
2. 23SN0087 - Meadowville Road Rezoning - Bermuda
In Bermuda Magisterial District, Meadowville Road
Rezoning is a request to rezone from Agricultural (A),
Neighborhood Business (C-2), and Community Business
(C-3) to Community Business (C-3) with conditional use
planned development to permit exceptions to ordinance
requirements and amendment of zoning district map on
5.46 acres known as 27, 101, 107, 109, 111, and 121
Meadowville Road, and 108, 116, 200, and 204 East
09/25/2024 Page 21 of 63
Hundred Road. The Comprehensive Plan suggests the
property is appropriate for Community Business use.
Tax IDs 814-652-5387, 6781, 7781, 7994; 814-653-4407,
5807, 6613, 7317, 7920, and 8631.
Ms. Wilson introduced Case 23SN0087. She stated the
Planning Commission and staff recommended approval,
subject to the conditions in the staff report.
Mr. Holland called for public comment.
There being no one to speak to the issue, the public
hearing was closed.
On motion of Mr. Ingle, seconded by Mr. Carroll, the
Board approved Case 23SN0087, subject to the following
conditions:
Proffered Conditions
The Applicant in this case, Emerson Companies, LLC,
(the “Applicant’) pursuant to Section 15.2-2298 of the
Code of Virginia (1950 as amended) and the Zoning
Ordinance of Chesterfield County, for itself and its
successors or assigns, proffers that the use of the
property under consideration in this case (the
“Property”) will be according to the following
conditions if, and only if, the request submitted
herewith is granted with only those conditions agreed
to by the Applicant. In the event this request is
denied or approved with conditions not agreed to by
the Applicant, the proffer conditions shall
immediately be null and void and of no further force
or effect.
1. Master Plan. The Master Plan for the
Development of the Property shall consist of the
following:
A. The Textual Statement dated September 10,
2024.
B. The conceptual layout last revised
September 9, 2024, entitled, “MEADOWVILLE TRIANGLE
BERMUDA DISTRICT, CHESTERFIELD COUNTY, VIRGINIA
CONCEPTUAL – MEDICAL OFFICES” prepared by Townes Site
Engineering (referred to herein as “Concept Plan A”),
the conceptual layout last revised September 9, 2024,
entitled, “MEADOWVILLE TRIANGLE DEVELOPMENT BERMUDA
DISTRICT, CHESTERFIELD COUNTY, VIRGINIA CONCEPTUAL –
RETAIL DEVELOPMENT” prepared by Townes Site
Engineering (referred to herein as “Concept Plan B”),
and the conceptual layout last revised September 9,
2024, 2024, entitled, “MEADOWVILLE TRIANGLE RESTAURANT
DEVELOPMENT BERMUDA DISTRICT, CHESTERFIELD COUNTY,
VIRGINIA CONCEPTUAL - RESTAURANTS” prepared by Townes
Site Engineering (referred to herein as “Concept Plan
C”). The Property shall be designed and developed as
generally depicted on Concept Plans noted above or
another concept plan that is approved by the Planning
Commission at the time of site plan approval.
Whichever of the foregoing four (4) alternate concept
plans is selected shall be referred to as the
09/25/2024 Page 22 of 63
“Selected Concept Plan,” and the exact location of the
lots, buildings, parking, public road accesses, shared
accesses, common areas, and other improvements may be
modified provided that the general intent of the
Selected Concept Plan is maintained, as approved by
the Planning and Transportation Departments.
C. The conceptual shared access layout last
revised September 9, 2024, entitled, “MEADOWVILLE
TRIANGLE DEVELOPMENT BERMUDA DISTRICT, CHESTERFIELD
COUNTY, VIRGINIA SHARED ACCESS EXHIBIT” prepared by
Townes Site Engineering (referred to herein as “Shared
Access Plan”). The Property shall be designed and
developed, with respect to shared accesses, as
generally depicted on the Shared Access Plan. The
exact location of the lots, buildings, parking, public
road accesses, shared accesses, common areas, and
other improvements may be modified provided that the
general intent of the Shared Access Plan is maintained
as approved by the Planning and Transportation
Departments. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary
in the Shared Access Plan or Selected Concept Plan,
the Owner/Developer shall permit properties adjacent
to the west of the Property to have shared access
through the Property, provided that the owners of such
properties shall be solely responsible for all costs
associated with establishing such accessways,
including without limitation, costs for design,
permitting, and construction. (P)
2. Connection to County Water/Sewer. The Applicant
shall connect the Property to County water and sewer
at time of construction. (U)
3. Access.
a. The exact location of each vehicular access
shall be approved by the Transportation Department:
1) East Hundred Road (Route 10): Direct
access to/from the Property to Route 10 shall be
limited to one (1) access. If the access aligns with
the existing signalized crossover/median break, then
the access shall be designed to prohibit vehicles
exiting the Property from traveling east on Route 10,
as approved by the Transportation Department.
2) Meadowville Road: Direct access
to/from the Property to Meadowville Road shall be
limited to two (2) accesses. One access may align
with the existing eastern crossover/median break along
the Property’s frontage to Meadowville Road, provided
the access and/or the crossover are designed to
prohibit vehicles exiting the Property from traveling
west on Meadowville Road, as approved by the
Transportation Department. The westernmost access
shall be limited to right-in and right-out movements
and located a minimum of one hundred (100) feet
west/south of the existing western crossover/median
break along Meadowville Road, unless otherwise
approved by the Transportation Department.
Notwithstanding anything to the contrary that is shown
on the Selected Concept Plan, if requested by the
09/25/2024 Page 23 of 63
Owner/Developer and approved by the Transportation
Department, one (1) additional access may be permitted
from/to Meadowville Road.
b. At time of plan review, if required by
the Transportation Department, prior to final site
plan approval, access easement(s), acceptable to the
Transportation Department, shall be recorded from the
Route 10 and/or Meadowville Road accesses to serve the
adjacent properties to the west, south, and east. (T)
4. Road Improvements. To provide an adequate
roadway system, the Owner/Developer shall be
responsible for the following road improvements. The
exact design of these improvements shall be approved
by the Transportation Department. If any of these
improvements are provided by others, as determined by
the Transportation Department, then the specific
improvement(s) shall no longer be required by the
Owner/Developer of the Property.
a. Construction of additional pavement along
the westbound lanes of Route 10 at the approved access
to provide a separate right turn lane. This
improvement shall be completed prior to issuance of a
certificate of occupancy for development of the
property that will be served by and will construct the
Route 10 access.
b. If the Route 10 access utilizes the
existing signalized Route 10 crossover/median break,
then the Owner/Developer shall construct crossover and
traffic signal modifications at the existing
crossover/median break to accommodate the property
access. Improvement shall be completed prior to
issuance of a certificate of occupancy for development
of the property that will be served by and will
construct the Route 10 access.
c. Construction of additional pavement along
the eastbound lanes of Meadowville Road at each
approved access to provide a separate right turn lane.
Improvement shall be completed prior to issuance of a
certificate of occupancy for development of the
property that will be served by and will construct
each property access.
d. Dedication to Chesterfield County, free
and unrestricted, of any additional right-of-way (or
easements) required for the road improvements
identified above. (T)
5. Architectural/Design Elements. All
Architectural/Design Elements below are considered
minimum standards for the development of the
Property.
A. Style and Form.
i. Commercial office buildings shall
have an architectural treatment and materials
generally consistent with those depicted in the
conceptual elevations submitted herewith as EXHIBIT A,
09/25/2024 Page 24 of 63
but variation from the conceptual elevations shall be
permitted as approved by the Planning Department at
time of site plan review.
ii. Retail buildings shall have an
architectural treatment and materials generally
consistent with the buildings currently existing in
the Ironwill shopping center located at 9821, 9836,
9949, 9951, and 9959 Iron Bridge Road or the Rivers
Bend shopping center located at the intersection of
Rivers Bend Boulevard and E. Hundred Road, which
existing buildings are depicted in the conceptual
images submitted herewith as EXHIBIT B. Variation from
the conceptual images shown in EXHIBIT B shall be
permitted as approved by the Planning Department at
time of site plan review. (P)
6. Pedestrian Circulation Within Property to
Meadowville Road. At time of plans review, the
Owner/Developer shall be required to provide
hardscaped pedestrian walkways within the Property,
with the exact locations approved by the Planning
Department. (P)
Ayes: Holland, Miller, Ingle, Schneider and Carroll.
Nays: None.
3. 24SN1151 - Royal Farms at Rivers Bend Setback
Exception - Bermuda
In Bermuda Magisterial District, Royal Farms at Rivers
Bend Setback Exception is a request for conditional
use planned development to permit exceptions to
ordinance requirements and amendment of zoning
district map in a Community Business (C-3) District on
3.76 acres known as 210, 220, 230 East Hundred Road
and 13200 Rivers Bend Blvd. The Comprehensive Plan
suggests the property is appropriate for Community
Business use. Tax IDs 814-652-9588; 815-652-0686,
1474, and 1995.
Ms. Wilson introduced Case 24SN1151. She stated the
Planning Commission and staff recommended approval,
subject to the conditions in the staff report.
Mr. Holland called for public comment.
There being no one to speak to the issue, the public
hearing was closed.
On motion of Mr. Ingle, seconded by Mr. Carroll, the
Board approved Case 24SN1151, subject to the following
conditions:
Conditions
1. Conceptual Plan. Development of the Property
shall generally conform to the Conceptual Plan
(Exhibit A), titled “Royal Farms Store # 453, Shared
Access Exhibit”, prepared by Kimley Horn last revised
July 26, 2024, with respect to vehicular access. The
layout on the Conceptual Plan is conceptual in nature
and may vary based on the site plan depending on final
09/25/2024 Page 25 of 63
engineering and environmental studies or as otherwise
approved by the Planning Commission at the time of
plans review. (P)
2. Setbacks. The parking setback along the northern
property line shall be a minimum of ten (10) feet.
Parking setbacks along all other property lines and
building setbacks along all property lines shall meet
the requirements of the Route 10 East Design District,
as specified in Sec. 19.1-382 of the Zoning Ordinance.
(P)
3. Screening. The parking setback along the
northern property line shall be improved with an
opaque structural fence at least six feet (6’) in
height, or alternative screening as approved by the
Planning Department at time of site plan review. Such
screening shall be maintained for so long as the
adjacent parcels are occupied by a residential use.
(P)
4. Access Easement. Prior to final site plan
approval, an access easement, acceptable to the
Transportation Department, shall be recorded to/from
the Rivers Bend Boulevard access across the subject
property to the adjacent property(ies) to the west.
(T)
Ayes: Holland, Miller, Ingle, Schneider and Carroll.
Nays: None.
4. 24SN1087 - Branders Bridge Rezoning - Bermuda
In Bermuda Magisterial District, Branders Bridge
Rezoning is a request to rezone from Residential (R-
12) to Agricultural (A) plus conditional use to permit
a second dwelling and amendment of zoning district map
on property known as 13609 Branders Bridge Road. The
7.14 acre property is proposed for a maximum of two
dwelling units. The Comprehensive Plan suggests the
property is appropriate for Suburban Residential II
use (2 to 4 dwellings per acre). Tax ID 785-646-8847.
Ms. Wilson introduced Case 24SN1087. She stated the
Planning Commission and staff recommended approval,
subject to the conditions in the staff report.
Mr. Holland called for public comment.
There being no one to speak to the issue, the public
hearing was closed.
On motion of Mr. Ingle, seconded by Dr. Miller, the
Board approved Case 24SN1087, subject to the following
conditions:
Conditions
1. Occupancy Limitations. Occupancy of the second
dwelling unit shall be limited to the occupants of the
principal dwelling unit, individuals related to them
by blood, marriage, adoption or guardianship, foster
children, personal guests, and household employees.
09/25/2024 Page 26 of 63
(P)
2. Deed Restrictions. For the purpose of providing
record notice, prior to the issuance of a certificate
of occupancy for the second dwelling unit, a deed
restriction shall be recorded setting forth the
limitation in Condition 1. The deed book and page
number of such restriction and a copy of the
restriction as recorded shall be submitted to the
Planning Department. (P)
3. Dedication. In conjunction with any subdivision
plat or within sixty (60) days from a written request
by the County, whichever occurs first, forty- five (
45) feet of right of way on the south side of Old
Happy Hill Road and forty- five (45) feet of right of
way on the east side of Branders Bridge Road, measured
from the centerlines of those roads, shall be
dedicated, free and unrestricted, to and for the
benefit of Chesterfield County. (T)
4. Access. There shall be no direct vehicular
access to/from Branders Bridge Road. (T)
Ayes: Holland, Miller, Ingle, Schneider and Carroll.
Nays: None.
5. 24SN1096 - Boschen Woods Phase 2 - Dale
In Dale Magisterial District, Boschen Woods Phase 2 is
a request to rezone from Agricultural (A) and
Residential (R-15) to Residential (R-15) and amendment
of zoning district map on property known as 8410 Beach
Road. The 5.53 acre property is proposed for a maximum
development of 4 dwelling units. The Comprehensive
Plan suggests the property is appropriate for
Residential Agricultural use Tax ID 763-661-8201.
Ms. Wilson introduced Case 24SN1096. She stated the
Planning Commission and staff recommended approval,
subject to the conditions in the staff report.
Mr. Holland called for public comment.
There being no one to speak to the issue, the public
hearing was closed.
On motion of Mr. Holland, seconded by Dr. Miller, the
Board approved Case 24SN1096, subject to the following
conditions:
Proffered Conditions
The Applicant hereby offers the following proffered
conditions:
1. Master Plan. The Textual Statement, last revised
August 1, 2024, shall be considered the Master Plan.
(P)
2. Utilities. Public water systems shall be used
for all new residential dwelling units. Existing
residential structures on the property may continue to
utilize existing well and septic systems; provided
09/25/2024 Page 27 of 63
however, water service connection shall be provided
for the existing residential structure and shown on
the subdivision construction plan for future
connection if or when desired. (U)
3. Conceptual Plan. The site shall be developed in
general conformance with the Conceptual Plan (Exhibit
A), titled “Boschen Woods Phase 2”, prepared by Balzer
and Associates last revised May 28, 2024, with respect
to the general layout of roads and lots. The layout on
the Conceptual Plan is conceptual in nature and may
vary based on final soil studies, RPA lines, lot, and
road design, building footprints and other engineering
reasons. If adjustments are deemed to be significant,
the Conceptual Plan shall be presented to the Planning
Commission for final approval. (P)
4. Dwelling Size. For any newly construction
dwelling units, one (1) story dwelling units shall
have a minimum gross floor area of 2,000 square feet
and dwellings with more than one (1) story shall have
a minimum gross floor area of 2,500 square feet. (P)
5. Density. No more than four (4) dwelling units
shall be developed on the Property. (P)
6. Transportation.
a. Prior to any site plan approval, in
conjunction with recordation of the initial
subdivision plat, or within sixty (60) days from a
written request by the Transportation Department,
whichever occurs first, forty-five (45) feet of right-
of-way along the northern side of Beach Road, measured
from the centerline of that part of Beach Road
immediately adjacent to the Property, shall be
dedicated, free and unrestricted, to and for the
benefit of Chesterfield County.
b. The developer shall provide the following
road improvements with initial development of the
Property:
i. Widening/improving the north side
of Beach Road to a twelve (12) foot wide travel lane,
measured from the centerline of the road, with an
additional four (4) foot wide paved shoulder plus a
four (4) foot wide unpaved shoulder and overlaying the
full width of the road with one and one half (1.5)
inches of compacted bituminous asphalt concrete, with
modifications approved by the Transportation
Department, for the entire Property frontage; and
ii. Dedication of Chesterfield
County, free and unrestricted, of any additional
right-of-way (or easements) required for the
improvements identified above. (T)
7. Access. Direct vehicular access to Beach Road
shall be limited to the existing residential driveway
that serves the existing home on “Proposed Lot 1
Section 2,” as generally shown on the Conceptual Plan
(Exhibit A). If the property is redeveloped, as
09/25/2024 Page 28 of 63
determined by the Transportation Department, or direct
vehicular access is provided to Boschen Woods Place
for the existing home, then the existing Beach Road
access shall be removed and there shall be no direct
vehicular access to Beach Road. (T, P)
8. Subdivision Design Elements:
a. Driveways: All portions of driveways and
parking areas shall be brushed concrete, stamped
concrete, exposed aggregate concrete, asphalt or
decorative pavers.
b. Front Walks: A minimum of a 3-foot-wide
concrete front walk shall be provided to the front
entrance of each dwelling unit, to connect to drives,
sidewalks or street.
c. Front Foundation Planting Beds:
Foundation planting is required along the entire front
façade of all units and shall extend along all sides
facing a street. Foundation Planting Beds shall be a
minimum of four (4) feet wide from the unit
foundation. Planting beds shall include medium shrubs,
spaced a maximum of four (4) feet apart. The plant
materials used should visually soften the unit corners
and complement the architecture of the home at their
mature sizes. Planting bed deviations may be approved
by the Planning Department at time of plans review due
to unique design circumstances. (P)
9. Residential Architecture and Materials: The
following shall only be applicable to new
construction.
a. Style and Form. Unless significant
deviations are approved by the Planning Commission
during subdivision plan review, the architectural
treatment of the single-family dwellings shall be
generally compatible and consistent in quality with
the single-family dwellings shown in Exhibit A.
b. Materials. Acceptable siding materials
include brick, stone, masonry, fiber cement siding
(such as HardiPlank, HardieShingle, and HardieTrim),
or engineered wood siding (such as LP SmartSide),
premium quality vinyl siding with a minimum thickness
of .044 inches or other comparable material as
approved by the Planning Director at time of plans
review. Dutch lap and plywood siding are not
permitted. Other materials may be used for trim,
architectural decorations, or design elements provided
they blend with the architecture of the dwelling.
Where a dwelling borders more than one street, all
street-facing facades shall be finished in the same
materials.
c. Foundation Treatment. All exposed
portions of the foundation, except for exposed piers
supporting front porches, shall be faced with brick or
stone veneer a minimum of sixteen inches (16”) above
grade.
09/25/2024 Page 29 of 63
d. Repetition. Single family detached
dwelling units with the same elevations, not including
the same style (Craftsman, Farmhouse, etc.), and color
palette may not be adjacent to each other on the same
street.
e. Step-down Siding. For dwelling units
stepping the siding down below the first floor shall
be permitted on the side and rear elevations that do
not front on a street, with a maximum of two (2) steps
permitted on any elevation. A minimum of 24 inches of
exposed brick or stone shall be required, unless a
lesser amount is approved by the Planning Department
at time of plans review due to unique design
circumstances.
f. Roof Materials. Roofing materials shall
be standing seam metal or dimensional architectural
shingles or better with a minimum 30-year warranty.
g. Porches and Stoops.
iii. Front Porches: Where elevated
more than sixteen (16) inches, front entry stoops and
front porches shall be constructed with continuous
masonry foundation wall or on 12”x12” masonry piers.
Extended front porches shall be a minimum of five (5)
feet deep. Space between piers under porches shall be
enclosed with framed lattice panels. Where provided or
required by code on elevated porches, handrails and
railings shall be finished painted wood, vinyl or
metal railing with vertical pickets or sawn balusters.
Pickets shall be supported on top and bottom rails
that span between columns.
iv. Front Porch Flooring: Porch
flooring may be concrete, exposed aggregate concrete,
or a finished paving material such as stone, tile or
brick, finished (stained or painted) wood, or properly
trimmed composite decking boards. All front steps
shall be masonry to match the foundation.
h. Garages. Front loaded garages shall use
an upgraded garage door. An upgraded garage door is
any door with a minimum of three (3) enhanced
features. Enhanced features shall include windows,
raised panels, decorative panels, arches, ornamental
hardware or other architectural features on the
exterior that enhance the entry (i.e., decorative
lintels, shed roof overhangs, arches, columns,
keystones, eyebrows, etc.). Flat panel garage doors
are prohibited.
i. Heating, Ventilation and Air Conditioning
(HVAC) Units and House Generators. Units adjacent to
public right of way shall be screened from view by
landscaping or low maintenance material, as approved
by the Planning Department. (P)
10. Minimum Lot Size. Lots shall be a minimum of
30,000 square feet in size. (P)
Ayes: Holland, Miller, Ingle, Schneider and Carroll.
09/25/2024 Page 30 of 63
Nays: None.
6. 24SN1106 - Midlothian Restaurant and Cigar Bar -
Midlothian
In Midlothian Magisterial District, Midlothian
Restaurant and Cigar Bar is a request for conditional
use to permit a cigar lounge accessory to a restaurant
(Recreational Substances, Retail, On-Site Use), and
amendment of zoning district map in the General
Business (C-5) District on 0.45 acre known as 8700
Midlothian Turnpike. The Comprehensive Plan suggests
the property is appropriate for Community Business
use. Tax ID 756-705-6558.
Ms. Wilson introduced Case 24SN1106. She stated the
Planning Commission and staff recommended approval,
subject to the conditions in the staff report.
Mr. Holland called for public comment.
There being no one to speak to the issue, the public
hearing was closed.
On motion of Dr. Miller, seconded by Mr. Carroll, the
Board approved Case 24SN1106, subject to the following
conditions:
Conditions
1. Recreational Substances Use. Recreational
substance use (Retail, On-Site only) shall be
permitted on the Property – for the sale of Cigars
only. Further, this use may be located on the Property
within 2,000 linear feet of an existing recreational
substances use, see Exhibit B. (P)
2. Hours of Operation. The hours of operation shall
be limited to Monday thru Thursday, 4pm to 12am, and
Friday thru Sunday, 12 pm to 12 am. (P)
3. Window Advertising. Window advertising is
prohibited. (P)
4. Accessory Lighting of Windows and Doors.
Accessory lighting of windows and doors that include
the use of colored lighting shall be prohibited.
This condition shall not prohibit typical lighting of
windows and doors for the purposes of providing
security or customer/employee safety. (P)
Ayes: Holland, Miller, Ingle, Schneider and Carroll.
Nays: None.
7. 24SN1107 - A1 Door Company Exception to Parking
Setback - Dale
In Dale Magisterial District, A1 Door Company
Exception to Parking Setback is a request for
conditional use planned development to permit
exceptions to ordinance requirements and amendment of
zoning district map in Light Industrial (I-1) District
09/25/2024 Page 31 of 63
on 1.81 acres known as 7901 Reycan Road and 7741
Whitepine Road. The Comprehensive Plan suggests the
property is appropriate for Industrial use. Tax IDs
765-671-1576 and 2886.
Ms. Wilson introduced Case 24SN1107. She stated the
Planning Commission and staff recommended approval,
subject to the conditions in the staff report.
Mr. Holland called for public comment.
There being no one to speak to the issue, the public
hearing was closed.
On motion of Mr. Holland, seconded by Mr. Carroll, the
Board approved Case 24SN1107, subject to the following
conditions:
Proffered Conditions
The Applicant in this case, pursuant to Section 15.2-
2298 of the Code of Virginia (1950 as amended) and the
Zoning Ordinance of Chesterfield County, for itself
and its successors or assigns, proffer that the
property known as Chesterfield County Tax
Identification Numbers 765-671-1576-00000 and 765-671-
2886-00000 (the “Property”) under consideration will
be used according to the following proffer(s) if, and
only if, the request submitted herewith is granted
with only those conditions agreed to by the
Applicants. In the event this request is denied or
approved with conditions not agreed to by the owners
and Applicants, the proffer shall immediately be null
and void and of no further force or effect.
1. Master Plan. The Textual Statement dated August
7, 2024, together with the Concept Plan referenced in
the Textual Statement, shall be considered the Master
Plan. (P)
2. Landscaping in Parking Setback. To partially
screen the parking area that serves the Property,
landscaping shall be provided within the parking
setback along Reycan Road (Route 737) as generally
shown on the Concept Plan, or as otherwise approved in
writing by the Director of Planning at time of Plan
Review. (P)
Ayes: Holland, Miller, Ingle, Schneider and Carroll.
Nays: None.
8. 24SN1128 - McDonald Commercial Kennel - Clover
Hill
In Clover Hill Magisterial District, McDonald
Commercial Kennel is a request for conditional use to
permit a commercial kennel and amendment of zoning
district map in an Agricultural (A) District on 4.87
acres known as 11707 Genito Road. The Comprehensive
Plan suggests the property is appropriate for Suburban
Residential II use (2 to 4 dwellings per acre). Tax ID
741-685-0617.
09/25/2024 Page 32 of 63
Ms. Wilson introduced Case 24SN1128. She stated the
Planning Commission and staff recommended approval,
subject to the conditions in the staff report.
Mr. Holland called for public comment.
There being no one to speak to the issue, the public
hearing was closed.
On motion of Ms. Schneider, seconded by Mr. Ingle, the
Board approved Case 24SN1128, subject to the following
conditions:
Conditions
1. Use. This conditional use approval shall be for
a commercial kennel incidental to a dwelling. (P)
2. Non Transferable Ownership. This conditional use
approval shall be granted exclusively to Jessica
McDonald and shall not be transferable nor run with
the land. (P)
3. Frequency of Care. The applicant may care for a
maximum of one (1) mother dog and her litter at a
time. (P)
4. Staff. No staff from outside of the home shall
be permitted to work in this business. (P)
5. Sanitation and Waste Management. Any waste
created by the mother dog and litter shall be cleaned
regularly and disposed of in a proper manner. (P)
6. Improvements. There shall be no exterior
alternations or additions to accommodate the
commercial kennel. (P)
7. Time Limitation. This use shall be permitted for
a period of three (3) years from the date of approval.
(P)
Ayes: Holland, Miller, Ingle, Schneider and Carroll.
Nays: None.
9. 23SN0089 - TFC Old Stage Road Solid Waste
Transfer Facility - Bermuda
In Bermuda Magisterial District, TFC Old Stage Road
Solid Waste Transfer Facility is a request for
conditional use to permit a solid waste transfer
facility and amendment of zoning district map in a
Heavy Industrial (I-3) District on 14.97 acres known
as 12200 and 12300 Old Stage Road. The Comprehensive
Plan suggests the property is appropriate for
Industrial use. Tax IDs 802-657-9750 and 803-657-0311.
Ms. Wilson introduced Case 23SN0089. She stated the
Planning Commission and staff recommended approval,
subject to the conditions in the staff report.
Mr. Holland called for public comment.
09/25/2024 Page 33 of 63
There being no one to speak to the issue, the public
hearing was closed.
On motion of Mr. Ingle, seconded by Mr. Carroll, the
Board approved Case 23SN0089, subject to the following
conditions:
Conditions
1. Master Plan. The Master Plan for the Property
shall consist of the Conceptual Plan (Exhibit A).
Development of the Property shall generally conform to
the Conceptual Plan, titled “Old Stage Road Solid
Waste Transfer Station - Conceptual Plan”, prepared by
the LaBella Associates, dated January 15, 2024 and
last revised in February 2024, with respect to the
general layout of buildings, parking, access, and
setbacks. The layout on the Conceptual Plan is
conceptual in nature and may vary based on the final
site plan depending on final engineering and
environmental studies or as otherwise approved by the
Planning Commission at the time of plans review. (P)
2. Use. In addition to the uses permitted,
restricted, and prohibited by Case 00SN0126, a
conditional use for a solid waste transfer facility
("the facility") shall be permitted on the Property.
The use shall be located on the Property as generally
shown on Exhibit A. (P & CE)
3. Compliance with State Standards. Prior to the
issuance of a building permit for any solid waste
transfer use facility, the applicant shall provide
copies of all plans and permits approved by the
Department of Environmental Quality for such facility
to the Planning Department. (P)
4. Days and Hours of Operation. The transfer of
solid waste disposal on the Property shall be limited
to Monday through Friday, between the hours of 6 AM to
12 AM. Saturday operations shall be limited to the
hours of 8 AM to 2 PM. No Sunday operation is
permitted. (P & CE)
5. Site Improvements & Operation.
a. All employee and vehicle (including
truck/equipment) parking areas shall consist of
concrete or asphalt pavement.
b. Any private drive aisle used to support
truck traffic for this use shall consist of concrete
or asphalt that supports a minimum of 80,000 pounds of
compression. No gravel drives or parking areas shall
be permitted on the premises.
c. A filtered ventilation system and/or a
positive aroma misting system shall be installed with
this use. Use of the system(s) shall comply with the
approved Odor Management Plan.
d. Cleaning of the facility’s floor and the
trench at each receiving bay door shall be performed
daily, except when the facility is closed.
e. Bay and structure doors for this portion
of “the facility” shall be closed once daily debris is
09/25/2024 Page 34 of 63
removed and cleaning of the facility floor has been
performed.
f. No waste shall be left on the floor of
facility, nor shall any waste be stored outside of the
building after hours of operation have concluded. (P &
CE)
6. Waste Acceptance & Transfer. Any waste processed
by the facility shall be limited to household waste
only. No hazardous or medical waste shall be processed
as part of this use. In addition, waste that was
collected from outside the Commonwealth of Virginia
and transported to the facility by commercial or
government haulers shall be prohibited. (P & CE)
7. Fugitive Dust and On-Site Trash Mitigation Plan.
A plan for regular removal of trash, litter, dust and
debris from the Property and its frontage along Old
Stage Road shall be submitted in conjunction with the
submission of the site plan for review and approval.
(P & CE)
8. Odor Management & Vector Control Plans. An odor
management plan for regular measures to mitigate
potential odors from the use, including the frequency
of on-site cleaning of the facility and the use of a
filtered ventilation system and/or a positive aroma
misting system, shall be submitted in conjunction with
the submission of the site plan for review and
approval. A vector control plan for the facility shall
also be submitted in conjunction with the submission
of the site plan for review and approval. (P & CE)
9. Adopt-a-Highway. Any solid waste transfer
facility shall apply to the Virginia Department of
Transportation to enroll in the "Adopt a Highway"
program for the length of Old Stage Road from Route 10
to Osborne Road. This condition shall be deemed
satisfied if the recycling facility operator has
applied and been approved to participate in the
program, per the condition of zoning from Case
00SN0126. (P)
10. Submission & Notice of DEQ
Permits/Inspections/Complaints. The owner/operator of
the facility shall provide the following documentation
to the designated Chesterfield County representative:
the Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) permit
for the facility, notice of any DEQ inspection within
24-hours of the inspection, a copy of the DEQ
inspection letter to the County within ten (10) days
of receipt, and notice of any odor complaint with a
response by the owner/operator to the complaint. (P &
CE)
11. Inspections for Solid Waste Transfer Facility.
The owner/developer/operator shall allow County
inspections of the solid waste transfer facility at
reasonable times and with reasonable notice throughout
the life and post closure of the solid waste transfer
facility to include observing the taking of any and
all samples of air, waste, surface water, leachate, or
groundwater at the solid waste transfer facility. The
09/25/2024 Page 35 of 63
purposes of such inspection(s) shall be to ensure
compliance with all County, state and Federal
ordinances, statutes or regulations. (P & CE)
Ayes: Holland, Miller, Ingle, Schneider and Carroll.
Nays: None.
D. Discussion Cases
1. 24SN1135 - Love Commercial Kennel - Matoaca
In Matoaca Magisterial District, Love Commercial
Kennel is a request for conditional use to operate a
commercial kennel and amendment of zoning district map
in an Agricultural (A) District on 10.09 acres known
as 13551 Cedar Creek Road. The Comprehensive Plan
suggests the property is appropriate for Rural
Residential/Agricultural use. Tax ID 701-638-5538.
Ms. Haley Gist provided the Board with an overview of
Case 24SN1135. She stated the Planning Commission and
staff recommended approval, subject to the conditions
in the staff report.
Mr. Holland called for public comment.
There being no one to speak to the issue, the public
hearing was closed.
On motion of Mr. Carroll, seconded by Mr. Ingle, the
Board approved Case 24SN1135, subject to the following
conditions:
Conditions
1. Use. This conditional use approval shall be for
a commercial kennel incidental to a dwelling. (P)
2. Non Transferable Ownership. This conditional use
approval shall be granted exclusively to Mark and
Carrie Love and shall not be transferable nor run with
the land. (P)
3. Number of Dogs. Excluding the applicant's two
personal dogs, the business shall be limited to the
keeping of four (4) dogs at a time. (P)
4. Employees. Employees of the business shall be
limited to the applicants. No staff from outside of
the home shall be permitted. (P)
5. Outdoor Time. Any outdoor play time for the dogs
shall be supervised and within the existing run area.
Dogs must be on a lead, leash, or tether when not in
the run area. (P)
6. Improvements. There shall be no exterior
alternations or additions to accommodate the
commercial kennel. (P)
7. Breeding. No commercial breeding of the dogs may
occur. (P)
8. Time Limitation. This use shall be permitted for
09/25/2024 Page 36 of 63
a period of three (3) years from the date of approval.
(P)
Ayes: Holland, Miller, Ingle, Schneider and Carroll.
Nays: None.
2. 24SN1097 - Hickory Road Solar Farm - Matoaca
In Matoaca Magisterial District, Hickory Road Solar
Farm is a request for conditional use to permit a
large scale solar energy facility plus conditional use
planned development to permit exceptions to ordinance
requirements and amendment of zoning district map in
an Agricultural (A) District on 22.67 acres known as
8010 Hickory Road. The Comprehensive Plan suggests the
property is appropriate for Residential Agricultural
use. Tax ID 770-624-Part of 0068.
Mr. Richard Saunders provided the Board with an
overview of Case 24SN1097. He stated the Planning
Commission and staff recommended approval, subject to
the conditions in the staff report.
Mr. Luis Gonzalez provided details of the applicant's
request. He reviewed citizen concerns that were
brought up at the community meetings and how those
concerns were addressed. He also reviewed the benefits
of the project to the community.
Mr. Holland called for public comment.
Ms. Chloe Hodges, appearing on behalf of Energy Right,
stressed the importance of property rights when making
these decisions.
Mr. Patrick Brueggemann, appearing on behalf of the
International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers (IBEW)
Local 666, stated solar power can create jobs for
communities and give Chesterfield residents a pathway
to a good career with great wages and benefits.
Ms. Elinor Harper expressed concerns relative to the
drastic modification of landscape views when a solar
farm is built as well as the impact on property
values.
Mr. Jerry Turner expressed concerns relative to the
35-year life expectancy of the equipment, bonding, and
decommissioning.
Mr. Gonzalez provided a rebuttal to citizen comments.
He reviewed efforts to engage the community and
provide studies and reports; changes to the site plan;
and the decommissioning bond.
In response to Mr. Carroll's question relative to the
decommissioning bond, Mr. Gonzalez stated the net
present value includes a 25 percent buffer on labor
cost as well as a three percent depreciation rate.
Mr. Carroll inquired about what assurances could be
given that the buffer would shield the view from the
road.
09/25/2024 Page 37 of 63
Mr. Gonzalez stated the assurances that could be put
in place were compliance with the zoning ordinance
requirements as well as the increased density required
for some commercial uses. He further stated proper
maintenance, proper planning, and ensuring that they
reach desired density would properly conceal the view
shed.
There being no one else to speak to the issue, the
public hearing was closed.
Mr. Carroll inquired of Mr. Saunders if he was
confident that the view would eventually be blocked
from people driving by.
Mr. Saunders stated the requirements in the ordinance
for the road buffer are intended to fully screen from
the road, and the applicant is not seeking any relief
from that requirement.
In response to Mr. Carroll's question relative to
whether the panels rotate with the sun and track from
east to west, Mr. Saunders answered affirmatively.
Mr. Carroll stated any glare from the panels would not
necessarily point south, but rather east to west.
Mr. Ingle stated he would like to see an imposed
condition that, in the event the current buffer does
not shield the view from Hickory Road, the applicant
would install additional plantings to assure that
happens.
Mr. Carroll inquired of Mr. Saunders if staff would
need that condition imposed in order to be able to
enforce what Mr. Ingle suggested.
Mr. Saunders stated he was confident with the
requirement that it would be fully screened, but he
encouraged inclusion of the condition if it would make
the Board feel more confident.
Mr. Justin Vandenbroeck, appearing on behalf of ESA,
discussed establishing a timeline for plant growth.
Mr. Ingle stated he was less concerned about people
driving by and more concerned about the neighbor. He
asked Mr. Vandenbroeck to agree that if additional
plants are needed, they would be willing to add those
plants.
Mr. Vandenbroeck stated they could work in good faith
on that. He clarified that currently there is no
residence on the primary parcel referenced by Ms.
Harper.
Ms. Schneider expressed concerns over who determines
there are not enough plantings and how long would ESA
be required to keep coming back.
Mr. Holland stated it was his impression that staff
thinks it is adequate.
09/25/2024 Page 38 of 63
Mr. Carroll stated staff has assured him they are
confident they can enforce the ordinance and the
conditions in the report.
In response to Mr. Carroll's question relative to
fencing, Mr. Vandenbroeck stated they often leave them
open for wildlife passage.
On motion of Mr. Carroll, seconded by Ms. Schneider,
the Board approved Case 24SN1097, subject to the
following conditions:
Conditions
1. Conceptual Plan. Development of the Property
shall generally conform to the Conceptual Plan
(Exhibit A), titled “ESA Hickory Road Solar Farm –
SITE PLAN”, prepared by Uneclipsed Energy last revised
May 31, 2024, with respect to the general layout of
access points, anticipated location of transmission
lines and other utility connections, general location
of solar equipment and supplementary facilities to be
placed on site, and buffers. The layout on the
Conceptual Plan is conceptual in nature and may vary
based on the site plan depending on final engineering
and environmental studies or as otherwise approved by
the Planning Commission at the time of plans review.
(P)
2. Gravel Access Drives. The surface treatment for
access drives shall be either asphalt or gravel. Any
gravel drive shall be well-graded crushed run
aggregate (21B or equivalent) in lieu of pavement. All
drives shall be designed to meet minimum access
requirements for emergency equipment. (P & F)
3. Setbacks. The minimum setback between the
operational area, as defined in the Zoning Ordinance,
and the eastern and western property lines shall be
one hundred (100) feet. The minimum setback between
the operational area and all other property lines
shall be as specified in the Special Limitations for
Specific Uses in Sec. 19.1-52 of the Zoning Ordinance.
(P)
4. Buffers. The minimum buffer width between the
eastern and western property lines and the operational
area, as defined in the Zoning Ordinance, shall be one
fifty (50) feet. The minimum buffer width between all
other property lines and the operational area shall be
as specified in the Special Limitations for Specific
Uses in Sec. 19.1-52 of the Zoning Ordinance. Buffers
shall comply with the requirements of Perimeter
Landscaping C and the requirements of buffers in the
Zoning Ordinance. (P)
5. Dedication. Prior to any final site plan
approval or within sixty (60) days of a written
request by the County, whichever occurs first, forty-
five (45) feet of right of way along the north side of
Hickory Road, measured from the centerline of the road
immediately adjacent to the property, shall be
dedicated, free and unrestricted, to and for the
09/25/2024 Page 39 of 63
benefit of Chesterfield County. (T)
6. Road Improvement. In conjunction with initial
development of the solar facility, the owner/developer
shall be responsible for relocating the existing ditch
to provide an eight-foot (8’) unpaved shoulder, with
any modifications approved by the Transportation
Department, for the entire property frontage. (T)
7. Public Liaison. The applicant will designate a
person who will act as a point of contact between
citizens and construction crews (“Public Liaison”).
The contact information for the Public Liaison will be
posted at each access point, as published on the
Project’s website, and provided to Chesterfield County
staff. (P)
8. Fencing. A woven wire fence, a minimum of eight
(8) feet tall, shall be permitted to secure the
project area. (P)
9. Landscaping. For any landscaped areas, priority
shall be given to the use of native plant materials as
identified in the Chesterfield County Plant Material
List and as approved by the Planning Department at the
time of site plan approval. Virginia native grasses
shall be used for permanent ground cover and
supplemented with pollinator- friendly species. (P)
Ayes: Holland, Miller, Ingle, Schneider and Carroll.
Nays: None.
3. 23SN0095 - Woodpecker Road Solar Facilities -
Matoaca
In Matoaca Magisterial District, Woodpecker Road Solar
Facilities is a request for conditional use to permit
a large scale solar energy facility plus conditional
use planned development to permit exceptions to
ordinance requirements and amendment of zoning
district map in Agricultural (A) and Residential (R-9)
Districts on 124.52 acres fronting approximately 50
feet on the west line of Woodpecker Road, 425 feet
south of Ettrick Landing Drive. The Comprehensive Plan
suggests the property is appropriate for Suburban
Residential II use (2 to 4 dwellings per acre). Tax
IDs 789-619-4223; 790-616-Part of 9556; 790-618-0133
and 9437; 791-617-Part of 8164 and 792-616-8597.
Mr. Joe Feest provided the Board with an overview of
Case 23SN0095. He stated the Planning Commission
recommended approval, but staff continues to recommend
denial.
Mr. Holland called for public comment.
Mr. Bryan Jake-Schoffman with RWE appeared on behalf
of the applicant. He provided the Board with
additional information about the case. He discussed
neighbor outreach and feedback; all-terrain solar
trackers, and project benefits.
Mr. Patrick Brueggemann spoke in support of the case.
09/25/2024 Page 40 of 63
Ms. Chloe Hodges appeared on behalf of her colleague,
Blake Cox, who is in support of the project.
Mr. John Upton spoke in support of the project and
stated solar farms make good neighbors.
Mr. Kerry Hutcherson appeared on behalf of some
landowners whose properties are to the west. He stated
his clients are benefited by an access easement that
has existed since the 1880s, and they are working
through some specifics of how to preserve the access
while also allowing the solar facility to move
forward.
Mr. Jim Whelan spoke in support of the project.
Mr. Brennan Miller spoke in support of the project.
Mr. Stan Birch, one of the landowners who has the
easement, stated he is for the project as long as the
30-foot easement and 15-foot driveway are adhered to.
Mr. Jerry Turner stated he wants to make sure the
county is not on the hook in 25 years to clean up the
facility.
In response to Mr. Carroll's question relative to the
decommissioning bond, Mr. Jake-Schoffman stated he did
not have the exact figure, but it is closer to
$300,000 with a contingency plan of 25 percent, an
adjustment for inflation, and a check every five years
from a PE-licensed engineer by the DEQ and state who
has to verify their numbers and valuations for net
present value.
There being no one else to speak to the issue, the
public hearing was closed.
Mr. Carroll reviewed the zoning history of the
property, which is now zoned Agricultural (A). He
stated his motion would be to approve Case 23SN0095
subject to the replacement of Condition 4, and then he
would support all of the conditions. He further stated
Condition 4 would read as follows: Prior to site plan
approval, the Applicant shall provide a permanent
access easement appurtenant to those three parcels
identified as GPINs 7876185596, 7886190260, and
7886202413 that provides ingress and egress between
those three parcels and the Property's access point to
Woodpecker Road (the "Access Easement"). The Access
Easement shall have a width of up to thirty (30) feet
to provide for a private access road with a width of
up to fifteen (15) feet in width. The private access
road shall not be deemed a "drive aisle." The Access
Easement and private access road may encroach as much
as twenty (20) feet into the 100-foot buffer described
in Condition 8 and shown on Exhibit A. Nothing herein
shall prevent the Applicant and the owners of those
three parcels identified as GPINs 7876185596,
7886190260, and 7886202413 from agreeing on an
alternative route to grant the Access Easement or a
smaller encroachment into the 100-foot buffer. The
09/25/2024 Page 41 of 63
Access Easement route shall be delineated on the
approved final site plan.
Mr. Jake-Schoffman stated the applicant agreed with
the condition.
On motion of Mr. Carroll, seconded by Ms. Schneider,
the Board approved Case 23SN0095, subject to the
following conditions:
Conditions
1. Uses. The large-scale solar facility (“the
facility”) shall be limited to the portion of the
Property zoned Agricultural District. Uses permitted
on the Property shall be those uses permitted by-right
or with restrictions in the Agricultural District. In
addition, a large-scale solar facility may also be
permitted subject to the following conditions of this
zoning request. (P)
2. Conceptual Plan. Development of the Property
shall generally conform to the Conceptual Plan
(Exhibit A), titled “Woodpecker Road Solar Facility -
Conceptual Plan”, prepared by VHB last revised July
22, 2024, with respect to the general layout of access
points, anticipated location of transmission lines and
other utility connections, general location of solar
equipment and supplementary facilities to be placed on
site, and buffers. The layout on the Conceptual Plan
is conceptual in nature and may vary based on the site
plan depending on final engineering and environmental
studies or as otherwise approved by the Planning
Commission at the time of plans review. (P)
3. Gravel Access Drives. The surface treatment for
access drives shall be either asphalt or gravel. Any
gravel drive shall be well-graded crushed run
aggregate (21B or equivalent) in lieu of pavement. All
drives shall be designed to meet minimum access
requirements for emergency equipment. (P & F)
4. Access Easements. Prior to site plan approval,
the Applicant shall provide a permanent access
easement appurtenant to those three parcels identified
as GPINs 7876185596, 7886190260, and 7886202413 that
provides ingress and egress between those three
parcels and the Property's access point to Woodpecker
Road (the "Access Easement") . The Access Easement
shall have a width of up to thirty (30) feet to
provide for a private access road with a width of up
to fifteen (15) feet in width. The private access road
shall not be deemed a "drive aisle." The Access
Easement and private access road may encroach as much
as twenty (20) feet into the 100-foot buffer described
in Condition 8 and shown on Exhibit A. Nothing herein
shall prevent the Applicant and the owners of those
three parcels identified as GPINs 7876185596,
7886190260, and 7886202413 from agreeing on an
alternative route to grant the Access Easement or a
smaller encroachment into the 100-foot buffer. The
Access Easement route shall be delineated on the
approved final site plan.(P)
09/25/2024 Page 42 of 63
5. Dedication. Prior to any final site plan
approval or within sixty (60) days of a written
request by the County, whichever occurs first, forty-
five (45) feet of right of way along the west side of
Woodpecker Road, measured from the centerline of the
road immediately adjacent to the property, shall be
dedicated, free and unrestricted, to and for the
benefit of Chesterfield County. (T)
6. Public Liaison. The applicant will designate a
person who will act as a point of contact between
citizens and construction crews (“Public Liaison”).
The contact information for the Public Liaison will be
posted at each access point, as published on the
Project’s website, and provided to Chesterfield County
staff. (P)
7. Landscaping. For any landscaped areas, priority
shall be given to the use of native plant materials as
identified in the Chesterfield County Plant Material
List and as approved by the Planning Department at the
time of site plan approval. Virginia native grasses
shall be used for permanent ground cover and
supplemented with pollinator- friendly species. (P)
8. Enhanced Setback & Buffer. The facility and any
associated drive aisles shall be setback a minimum of
150 feet from the shared property line with GPIN 787-
617-9329. In addition, a 100 foot buffer shall also be
provided with the required setback as shown on Exhibit
A. (P)
Ayes: Holland, Miller, Ingle, Schneider and Carroll.
Nays: None.
4. 23SN0114 - Collington Neighborhood Recreational
Facility - Matoaca
In Matoaca Magisterial District, Collington
Neighborhood Recreational Facility is a request for
conditional use to permit a recreational neighborhood
facility and recreational equipment parking and
storage and amendment of zoning district map in a
Residential (R-25) District on 17.74 acres fronting
approximately 800 feet on the south line of West
Hensley Road, 345 feet southwest of Brandyfield Place.
The Comprehensive Plan suggests the property is
appropriate for Residential Agricultural use. Tax ID
726-656-4760.
Mr. Feest provided the Board with an overview of Case
23SN0114. He stated the Planning Commission and staff
recommended approval, subject to the conditions in the
staff report.
In response to Ms. Schneider's question relative to
tent camping, Mr. Feest stated tent camping would be
allowed to the rear of the property, just tents, and
chaperoned.
Mr. Carroll added that tent camping would be for
Collington residents only, and Mr. Feest concurred.
09/25/2024 Page 43 of 63
Mr. Holland called for public comment.
Mr. Will Shewmake, appearing on behalf of the
applicant, provided the Board with additional
information about the case. He discussed amendments
made to the case following the community meeting held
on March 14, 2024, and following the deferral at the
August 24, 2024, Board of Supervisors meeting.
In response to Mr. Ingle's question relative to the
proffered conditions being in the advertisement, Mr.
Shewmake stated all of the proffered conditions were
included before the advertisement went out.
Ms. Inez Costa-Clubb expressed concerns relative to RV
(recreational vehicle) boat storage, trailer parking,
the number of vehicles in a small area, and the impact
on residents in Brandy Oaks.
Mr. Shewmake provided a rebuttal. He stated the
applicant would be improving the aesthetics along
Hensley Road with 50-foot landscaping and fencing. He
further stated there is ample room in the front where
there is already gravel to have 35 vehicles. He stated
with the 100-foot buffer, they are not going to be
seen by anyone in Brandy Oaks. He further stated they
took out uses they thought would have an impact, and
that serves a very valuable purpose not only to
Collington but the greater community. He stated it is
not going to impact them given the buffers they put
in.
There being no one else to speak to the issue, the
public hearing was closed.
Discussion ensued relative to what would happen to the
land if the HOA (homeowners' association) were to sell
it.
Mr. Carroll inquired of Mr. Shewmake if the applicant
would consider making the zoning nontransferable if it
sells the land.
The Board took a brief recess while Mr. Shewmake
contacted his client.
Upon reconvening, Mr. Shewmake stated the applicant
had no problem with Mr. Carroll imposing the condition
that the zoning is nontransferable.
Mr. Carroll made a motion, seconded by Mr. Holland,
for the Board to approve Case 23SN0114 subject to the
conditions in the staff report and an imposed
condition that the CUPD is non-transferable.
Mr. Carroll provided an explanation for conditional
use permits and how a conditional use can be pulled
for noncompliance.
In response to Ms. Schneider's question relative to
who would be managing the property, Mr. Carroll stated
it would be managed by the HOA.
09/25/2024 Page 44 of 63
Mr. Holland called for a vote on Mr. Carroll's motion,
seconded by Mr. Holland, for the Board to approve Case
23SN0114 subject to the following conditions and one
imposed condition:
Conditions
1. Conceptual Plan. Development of a neighborhood
recreational facility (the “Facility) shall generally
conform to the Conceptual Plan titled “Collington
Neighborhood Recreational Facility Plan”, dated June
24, 2024 (Exhibit A) with respect to the general
location of uses (“Areas”), buffers and tree retention
areas. The Area limits may be modified provided their
relationship with other Areas and adjacent properties
shall be generally maintained. (P)
2. Use of Facility. The Facility shall primarily
serve the residents of the Collington Subdivision and
their guests and will not be open to the general
public for commercial purposes. Nothing herein shall
preclude the Collington Homeowners’ Association from
charging fees to residents who may use this facility.
(P)
3. Types of Facility Uses. Use of the Property for
a neighborhood recreational facility shall be limited
to the following active and passive amenities.
Provided, however, other recreational uses of the
same general characteristics as those listed herein
may be allowed as determined by the Director of
Planning in consideration of impacts on neighboring
residential properties. Further, permitted
recreational uses shall not include swimming pools:
a. Play fields.
b. Play courts.
c. Miniature golf.
d. Dog park.
e. Community garden.
f. Picnic pavilions.
g. Tent camping for Collington youth, their
chaperons and guests, limited to two (2) events per
year and two (2) nights per event. Each event shall be
chaperoned by adults.
h. Recreational vehicle and boat storage.
i. Walking trails. (P)
4. Sporting Events. The Facility shall not be used
for sports tournaments other than those events
primarily serving the Collington neighborhood. (P)
5. Recreational Vehicle and Boat Storage.
a. Use of the storage area shall be limited
exclusively to residents of the Collington
Subdivision.
b. Access to the storage area shall limited
to between the hours of 6:00 a.m. and 9:00 p.m.
c. No vehicle repair or maintenance shall be
permitted.
d. All stored recreational equipment shall
09/25/2024 Page 45 of 63
be operational and properly licensed. No inoperable or
junk vehicle storage shall be permitted.
e. Any discharge from recreational
equipment, including but not limited to, wastewater
(effluent), oil, or other engine fluids/lubricants
shall be prohibited.
f. A combined maximum of thirty-five (35)
recreational vehicles and boats shall be permitted in
the storage area at any given time.
g. No overnight stay shall be permitted within
any recreational vehicle located in the storage area.
h. The recreational vehicle and boat storage
area shall be secured with fencing a minimum of six
(6) feet in height, and a gate. The exact treatment
and height of this fencing shall be determined at the
time of site plan approval, provided that the fencing
located along West Hensley Road shall consist of an
opaque design made from vinyl or other composite
materials. (P)
6. Public Address System. Public address systems
shall not be permitted. (P)
7. Lighting. Exterior lighting for use of the
Facility during overnight hours shall not be provided
except where security lighting is provided. (P)
8. Buffers. A fifty (50) foot buffer shall be
provided along West Hensley Road and a seventy-five
(75) foot buffer shall be provided along all property
lines adjoining residential uses, except as noted
herein. These buffers shall comply with the
requirements of the Ordinance for fifty (50) foot and
seventy-five (75) foot buffers respectively. Provided,
however, a 100-foot buffer shall be established
between any recreational vehicle storage area and
property lines adjoining residential uses with such
buffer complying with the requirements of the
Ordinance for one-hundred (100) foot buffers. Except
for the removal of noxious vegetation or vegetation
that is dead, diseased or dying, removal of vegetation
within these buffers shall be prohibited. No buffer
shall be required along that portion of the property
which is contiguous to GPIN 727-657-9945 (Richmond
Kickers Soccer Facility.) (P)
9. Public Water. The public water system shall be
used for all non-residential structures requiring
domestic potable water service. (U)
10. Access. Direct vehicular access from the
Property to West Hensley Road shall be limited to one
(1) entrance/exit with the exact location of this
access approved by the Transportation Department. (T)
11. Development Standards. Development of the
Property for a neighborhood recreational facility
shall comply with the building and parking setback
requirements of the Emerging Growth District for O and
C Districts. (P)
Imposed Condition
09/25/2024 Page 46 of 63
12. Non-Transferable Ownership. This conditional
use approval shall be granted to and for Collington
Homeowners Association, exclusively, and shall not be
transferable nor run with the land. (P)
Ayes: Holland, Miller, Ingle, Schneider and Carroll.
Nays: None.
18. Public Hearings
A. To Consider an Application Filed by TFC for a Solid
Waste Transfer Facility on Old Stage Road
Mr. Stephen Donohoe introduced the public hearing for
the Board to consider an application filed by TFC for
a Solid Waste Transfer Facility on Old Stage Road
(24A71020). He reviewed the process for Article VII
review and approval. He stated staff recommended
approval.
Discussion ensued relative to DEQ (Department of
Environment Quality) review.
Mr. Holland called for public comment.
Ms. Renae Eldred expressed concerns relative to dirt
on the roadway from the facility. In addition, she
stated the facility should not smell.
Mr. Donohoe stated there are two conditions in the
conditional use that the Board approved earlier
(23SN0089) that address Ms. Eldred's concerns.
Discussion ensued relative to whether a suitability
form needs to be completed for this type of facility.
There being no one else to speak to the issue, the
public hearing was closed.
On motion of Mr. Carroll, seconded by Mr. Ingle, the
Board approved application 24A71020 for solid waste
management facility siting filed by TFC (Tidewater
Fibre Corporation) Recycling for siting approval of a
solid waste management facility, specifically a
municipal solid waste transfer facility, at 12200 and
12300 Old Stage Road.
Ayes: Holland, Miller, Ingle, Schneider and Carroll.
Nays: None.
B. To Consider Conveyance of Easements to Verizon
Virginia LLC
Ms. Lynn Snow, Real Property Manager, introduced the
public hearing to consider conveyance of two easements
to Verizon Virginia LLC across property in Point of
Rocks Park.
Mr. Holland called for public comment.
There being no one to speak to the issue, the public
hearing was closed.
09/25/2024 Page 47 of 63
On motion of Mr. Carroll, seconded by Dr. Miller, the
Board authorized the Chairman of the Board of
Supervisors and the County Administrator to execute an
agreement with Verizon Virginia LLC for underground
easements across property in Point of Rocks Park.
Ayes: Holland, Miller, Ingle, Schneider and Carroll.
Nays: None.
C. To Consider Conveyance of an Underground Easement to
Virginia Electric and Power Company at Elizabeth Davis
Middle School
Ms. Snow introduced the public hearing to consider
conveyance of an underground easement to Virginia
Electric and Power Company at Elizabeth Davis Middle
School.
Mr. Holland called for public comment.
There being no one to speak to the issue, the public
hearing was closed.
On motion of Mr. Ingle, seconded by Mr. Carroll, the
Board authorized the Chairman of the Board of
Supervisors and the County Administrator to execute an
agreement with Virginia Electric and Power Company for
an underground easement across the Elizabeth Davis
Middle School site.
Ayes: Holland, Miller, Ingle, Schneider and Carroll.
Nays: None.
D. To Consider the Vacation of a Portion of a 16'
Drainage Easement Across Lot 25, Reedy Springs
Subdivision, Section A
Ms. Snow introduced the public hearing to consider the
vacation of a portion of a 16' drainage easement
across Lot 25, Reedy Springs Subdivision, Section A.
Mr. Holland called for public comment.
There being no one to speak to the issue, the public
hearing was closed.
On motion of Dr. Miller, seconded by Mr. Ingle, the
Board adopted the following ordinance:
AN ORDINANCE whereby the COUNTY OF
CHESTERFIELD, VIRGINIA ("GRANTOR") vacates to
ROGER S. MOORE and PATRICIA BOTTS-MOORE,
husband and wife, ("GRANTEE") a portion of a
16’ drainage easement across Lot 25, Reedy
Springs Subdivision, Section “A”, DALE
Magisterial District, Chesterfield County,
Virginia, as shown on a plat thereof duly
recorded in the Clerk's Office, Circuit Court,
Chesterfield County, Virginia in Plat Book 273,
at Pages 2-6.
WHEREAS, Roger S. Moore and Patricia Botts-Moore
petitioned the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield
County, Virginia to vacate a portion of a 16’ drainage
09/25/2024 Page 48 of 63
easement across Lot 25, Reedy Subdivision, Section
“A”, DALE Magisterial District, Chesterfield County,
Virginia more particularly shown on a plat of record
in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of said
County in Plat Book 273, Pages 2-6, by Balzer &
Associates, dated November 27, 2019. The portion of
easement petitioned to be vacated is more fully
described as follows:
A portion of a 16’ drainage easement, across
Lot 25, Reedy Springs Subdivision, Section “A”,
the location of which is more fully shown on
the attached sketch, a copy of which is
attached hereto and made a part of this
Ordinance.
WHEREAS, notice has been given pursuant to Section
15.2-2204 of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended,
by advertising; and,
WHEREAS, no public necessity exists for the
continuance of the portion of easement sought to be
vacated.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF
SUPERVISORS OF CHESTERFIELD COUNTY, VIRGINIA:
That pursuant to Section 15.2-2272 of the Code of
Virginia, 1950, as amended, the aforesaid portion of
easement be and is hereby vacated.
This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect in
accordance with Section 15.2-2272 of the Code of
Virginia, 1950, as amended, and a certified copy of
this Ordinance, together with the plat attached hereto
shall be recorded no sooner than thirty days hereafter
in the Clerk's Office, Circuit Court, Chesterfield
County, Virginia pursuant to Section 15.2-2272 of the
Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended.
The effect of this Ordinance pursuant to Section 15.2-
2274 is to destroy the force and effect of the
recording of the portion of the plat vacated. This
Ordinance shall vest fee simple title to the portion
of easement hereby vacated in the property owner of
Lot 25, within Reedy Springs Subdivision, Section “A”
free and clear of any rights of public use.
Accordingly, this Ordinance shall be indexed in the
names of the GRANTOR and GRANTEE, or their successors
in title.
Ayes: Holland, Miller, Ingle, Schneider and Carroll.
Nays: None.
E. To Consider the Vacation of 8' Side Yard Easements in
Woolridge Landing, Section 3
Ms. Snow introduced the public hearing to consider the
vacation of 8' side yard easements in Woolridge
Landing, Section 3.
Mr. Holland called for public comment.
09/25/2024 Page 49 of 63
There being no one to speak to the issue, the public
hearing was closed.
On motion of Ms. Schneider, seconded by Mr. Ingle, the
Board adopted the following ordinance:
AN ORDINANCE whereby the COUNTY OF
CHESTERFIELD, VIRGINIA ("GRANTOR") vacates to
LARRY HARRELL and SANDRA HARELL, STYLE CRAFT
HOMES INC. OF VIRGINIA, a Virginia Corporation,
and CHRISTIE RUDICH ("GRANTEES") 8’ easements
across Lots 1, 13, 14, 17, 18, and 29,
Woolridge Landing Subdivision, Section 3,
MATOACA Magisterial District, Chesterfield
County, Virginia, as shown on a plat thereof
duly recorded in the Clerk's Office, Circuit
Court, Chesterfield County, Virginia in Plat
Book 308, at Page 75-80.
WHEREAS, Woolridge Development LC, a Virginia limited
liability company and Style Craft Homes Inc. of
Virginia, a Virginia Corporation, petitioned the
Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County, Virginia
to vacate 8’ easements across Lot 1, 13, 14, 17, 18
and 29, Woolridge Landing Subdivision, Section 3,
MATOACA Magisterial District, Chesterfield County,
Virginia more particularly shown on a plat of record
in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of said
County in Plat Book 308, Page 75-80, by Balzer &
Associates, dated April 18, 2023. The easements
petitioned to be vacated are more fully described as
follows:
8’ easements, across Lot 1, 13, 14, 17, 18, and
29, Woolridge Landing Subdivision, Section 3,
the location of which are more fully shown on a
plat made by Balzer & Associates, titled
Compiled Exhibit Showing Portions of 8’
Easements to be vacated across Lots 1, 13, 14,
17, 18, & 29 in Woodridge Landing Section 3,
dated August 7, 2024, a copy of which is
attached hereto and made a part of this
Ordinance.
WHEREAS, notice has been given pursuant to Section
15.2-2204 of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended,
by advertising; and,
WHEREAS, no public necessity exists for the
continuance of the easements sought to be vacated.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF
SUPERVISORS OF CHESTERFIELD COUNTY, VIRGINIA:
That pursuant to Section 15.2-2272 of the Code of
Virginia, 1950, as amended, the aforesaid easement be
and is hereby vacated.
This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect in
accordance with Section 15.2-2272 of the Code of
Virginia, 1950, as amended, and a certified copy of
this Ordinance, together with the plat attached hereto
09/25/2024 Page 50 of 63
shall be recorded no sooner than thirty days hereafter
in the Clerk's Office, Circuit Court, Chesterfield
County, Virginia pursuant to Section 15.2-2272 of the
Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended.
The effect of this Ordinance pursuant to Section 15.2-
2274 is to destroy the force and effect of the
recording of the portion of the plat vacated. This
Ordinance shall vest fee simple title to the easement
hereby vacated in the property owners of Lots 1, 13,
14, 17, 18, and 29, within Woolridge Landing
Subdivision, Section 3 free and clear of any rights of
public use.
Accordingly, this Ordinance shall be indexed in the
names of the GRANTOR and GRANTEE, or their successors
in title.
Ayes: Holland, Miller, Ingle, Schneider and Carroll.
Nays: None.
19. Fifteen-Minute Citizen Comment Period on Unscheduled Matters
Mr. Jerry Turner addressed the Board relative to
developers trying to subdivide smaller lots and add
additional houses.
Ms. Janice Caldwell addressed the Board relative to
nuclear power as a cleaner option; ditches; drainage;
and sidewalks.
20. Adjournment
A. Adjournment and Notice of Next Scheduled Meeting of
the Board of Supervisors
On motion of Dr. Miller, seconded by Ms. Schneider,
the Board adjourned at 10:15 p.m. to interviews for
Police Chief on October 4, 2024, beginning at 8 a.m.
in Room 502 of the County Administration Building, to
then adjourn to the VCU Real Estate Trends Conference
on October 10, 2024, beginning at 7:30 a.m. at the
Henrico Sports & Events Center, to then adjourn to the
Greater Richmond Continuum of Care Regional Summit on
Homelessness on October 10, 2024, at 4 p.m. at the
Westin-Richmond, to then adjourn to the Board of
Supervisors Plaque Unveiling on October 23, 2024, at
10 a.m. at the Beulah Recreation Center, to then
adjourn to the regularly scheduled Board of
Supervisors meeting on October 30, 2024, at 2 p.m. in
Room 502 of the County Administration Building.
Ayes: Holland, Miller, Ingle, Schneider and Carroll.
Nays: None.
__________________________ ___________________________
Joseph P. Casey James M. Holland
County Administrator Chairman
09/25/2024 Page 51 of 63
Citizen Comments Received Through the Comment Portal September 25, 2024 Board of Supervisors Meeting
Comment Type Comment Name District
Unscheduled
matter
Subject: Why does Dominion
get preferential treatment?
hollandj@chesterfield.gov
Dear Supervisor Holland,
The residents of Chesterfield
County deserve a hearing and
a vote on Dominion Energy’s
dirty gas power plant. I do
not understand how such a
massive energy project with
all the air pollution it will
spew can be approved by the
county without any public
discussion by our Board of
Supervisors. This inaction by
the Board raises serious
questions whether Dominion
Energy is unfairly getting
favorable treatment when an
ordinary resident may be
subjected to a hearing if
they want to build an
oversized garage in their
backyard. This makes no
sense.
Duane
Brankley
Bermuda
Unscheduled
matter
The residents of Chesterfield
County deserve a hearing and
a vote on Dominion Energy’s
dirty gas power plant. I do
not understand how such a
massive energy project with
all the air pollution it will
spew can be approved by the
county without any public
discussion by our Board of
Supervisors. This inaction by
the Board raises serious
questions whether Dominion
Energy is unfairly getting
favorable treatment when an
ordinary resident may be
subjected to a hearing if
they want to build an
oversized garage in their
backyard. This makes no
sense.
On September 25th, I expect
the board to announce that it
will schedule a hearing and a
vote on Dominion’s dirty gas
plant.
Melinda
Lewis
Midlothian
09/25/2024 Page 52 of 63
Comment Type Comment Name District
Unscheduled
matter
I respectfully urge the Board
to have a hearing and a vote
on the proposed gas plant. If
we truly care about
Chesterfield’s citizens and
health of our environment, we
need to have, at the very
least, a public hearing. You
have a mass of citizens who
have educated themselves on
the dangers of this plant and
we urge you to do the same.
Rebekah
Kusterbeck
Clover Hill
Unscheduled
matter
Dear Supervisor Holland,
One of the most daunting
challenges in the fight
against climate change is
that it's easy to dismiss the
slow moving, happens-to-
other-people narrative. Sure
there are fires and floods,
but they are not happening in
Chesterfield County, whereas
the need for reliable
electricity is ever-present.
Sadly, that doesn't help with
the fact that the impact of
the changing climate -- slow
though it may seem -- is of a
magnitude well beyond the
experience most of us have
with modern life. Climate
change promises the end of
life as we know it --
certainly for our kids and
grandkids, but most likely
for ourselves as well.
This is where courageous
leadership comes in, and
where the Chesterfield Board
of Supervisors risks going
down as a gathering of
cowards. As many residents of
Chesterfield have pointed out
repeatedly at hearings,
citizens deserve a hearing
and a vote on Dominion
Energy’s dirty gas power
plant. In this country, the
public gets a voice in
matters that affect their
well-being, and here is your
chance to respond
appropriately to that voice.
Dominion Energy is collecting
favors denied to ordinary
citizens.
At your meeting on September
25th, I expect the board to
announce that it will
schedule a hearing and a vote
Thomas Beach Bermuda
09/25/2024 Page 53 of 63
Comment Type Comment Name District
on Dominion’s dirty gas
plant.
Sincerely,
Tom Beach
Unscheduled
matter
Chesterfield County needs to
have a zero tolerance policy
towards Route 60's lack of
pedestrian infrastructure. In
that it has been having a lot
of pedestrian deaths lately
due to Route 60's lack of
sidewalks and streetlights
and crosswalks. And
Chesterfield County could
easily use funds from all the
new data centers being built
in the county to crank up
building sidewalks along it's
pedestrian death hotpots such
as Hull Street Route 60 and
Route 1. A example is
Powhatan County is looking at
getting one data center and
it will raise $17 million by
itself but Chesterfield is
getting several new data
centers so one data center
would triple funding for
sidewalks which is currently
at 6 million. Or it could
take some funding from the
Powhite Parkway Extension
which is getting $150 million
for 2 miles and 350 million
for nothing but roads from a
road funding bond. But it's
at the point there should be
no excuse for no sidewalks or
crosswalks construction along
Route 60 and other major
roads.
Carl
Schwendeman
Midlothian
Zoning case
- 23SN0062 -
Caliber
Collision
Boulders –
Midlothian
Chesterfield County needs to
ask for a new sidewalk along
Route 60 and Boulders
Parkway. In that the current
proposed buffer landscaping
with no sidewalk along Route
60 will force pedestrians
into the shoulder of Route 60
with the traffic.
Carl
Schwendeman
Midlothian
Zoning case
- 23SN0041 -
North
Hallsley -
Midlothian
Chesterfield County needs to
ask North Hallsley to build a
new sidewalk along all of Old
Hundred Road from the old
opening of Hallsley to the
new opening of Hallsley. Due
to the strange layout of the
lot of land that only touches
Carl
Schwendeman
Midlothian
09/25/2024 Page 54 of 63
Comment Type Comment Name District
Old Hundred Road at two tips
of it but yet the land
follows Old Hundred Road and
will house a lot of houses in
it at 300.
Unscheduled
matter
I strongly feel that The
residents of Chesterfield
County deserve a hearing and
a vote on Dominion Energy’s
dirty gas power plant.
Dominion Energy has
repeatedly stated that this
gas plant is needed to serve
the electricity demands of
data centers mostly
concentrated in Northern
Virginia. Why should we see
our electric bills increase
to subsidize some of the
richest and biggest tech
firms in the world? As county
leaders, you have an
opportunity to keep our bills
from rising and ensure
Dominion doesn't build this
dirty gas plant in our
backyard.
Paul Price Matoaca
Unscheduled
matter
Chairman Holland, Members of
the Chesterfield Board of
Supervisors:
All of us need to take
responsibility for addressing
climate change, and the
Chesterfield County Board of
Supervisors may take
responsibility by denying a
permit for Dominion Energy's
CERC. As you should know, the
attorney for Friends of
Chesterfield is of the
opinion that the 2010
conditional use granted
Dominion Energy is not a
carte blanche for a new gas
plant 14 years later. It
makes no sense. We are
waiting on the Planning
Department to respond to a
July 24, 2024 attorney's
letter requesting written
zoning certification on the
500 Coxendale Road site
challenging the validity of
the county administration's
position that Dominion has
the required zoning.
Neither does it make sense
Glen Besa Dale
09/25/2024 Page 55 of 63
Comment Type Comment Name District
that a resident building an
oversized garage in their
backyard has to have a
hearing, but a 1000 MW
heavily polluting gas plant
gets a pass. That appears to
be preferential treatment to
a powerful, politically
influential corporate
monopoly.
Methane is a potent climate
pollutant, and the more we
use, the more that leaks into
the atmosphere worsening
climate change. This summer
was the hottest on record and
it seems like every year is a
new record. Dominion Energy
may be inclined to put profit
over the well being of the
people, but as elected
officials you have a greater
responsibility to represent
Chesterfield residents and
protect us from pollution.
With the disproportionate
impacts of this project on a
neighboring predominantly
lower income community of
color, the people of
Chesterfield County have a
right to be heard regardless
of whatever advice you may be
getting from county staff who
work for you. A VA DEQ
hearing on an air pollution
permit is no substitute for
county decision making on
zoning and suitability.
This methane burning
powerplant does not make
sense economically either if
one accounts for the social
costs of carbon pollution as
calculated by the US EPA.
That cost is over $190 per
ton of CO2. That means that
the CERC emitting 2.2 million
tons of CO2 per year shifts
costs of over $400 million
per year onto the public.
That does not include the
cost of building this gas
plant that will show up on
our electric bills as we are
asked to subsidize the
electricity needs of tech
firms which are the richest
corporations in the world.
09/25/2024 Page 56 of 63
Comment Type Comment Name District
How is that fair to your
constituents?
We deserve a hearing on the
zoning and suitability of
this site. It's just that
simple.
Sincerely,
Glen Besa
Unscheduled
matter
Dear Supervisor Holland,
The residents of Chesterfield
County deserve a hearing and
a vote on Dominion Energy’s
dirty gas power plant. Our
neighbors who live especially
close to the proposed gas
plant have endured almost
eighty years of toxic air
pollution from Dominion’s
coal plant which was just
retired last year. Why should
they, why should all of us be
subjected to another 30 or 40
years of toxic air pollutants
from this gas plant when
Dominion Energy can invest in
solar, wind, energy storage
and efficiency to meet our
future energy needs.
On September 25th, I expect
the board to announce that it
will schedule a hearing and a
vote on Dominion’s dirty gas
plant.
Whitney
McCrum-
Morrison
Bermuda
Unscheduled
matter
Subject: Don’t let Dominion
raise our electric bills for
a new gas plant
hollandj@chesterfield.gov
Dear Supervisor Holland,
The residents of Chesterfield
County deserve a hearing and
a vote on Dominion Energy’s
dirty gas power plant.
Dominion Energy has
repeatedly stated that this
gas plant is needed to serve
the electricity demands of
data centers mostly
concentrated in Northern
Virginia. Why should we see
our electric bills increase
to subsidize some of the
richest and biggest tech
firms in the world? As county
leaders, you have an
opportunity to keep our bills
from rising and ensure
Dominion doesn't build this
dirty gas plant in our
Duane
Brankley
Bermuda
09/25/2024 Page 57 of 63
Comment Type Comment Name District
backyard.
On September 25th, I expect
the board to announce that it
will schedule a hearing and a
vote on Dominion’s dirty gas
plant.
Sincerely,
Duane Brankley
Unscheduled
matter
The residents of Chesterfield
County deserve a hearing and
a vote on Dominion Energy’s
dirty gas power plant. I do
not understand how such a
massive energy project with
all the air pollution it will
spew can be approved by the
county without any public
discussion by our Board of
Supervisors. This inaction by
the Board raises serious
questions whether Dominion is
unfairly getting favorable
treatment when an ordinary
resident may be subjected to
a hearing if they want to
build an oversized garage in
their backyard.
Dominion has acknowledged
that this gas plant is mostly
needed to serve the
electricity demands of data
centers, largely located in
Northern VA. Why should we
see our electric bills
increase to subsidize some of
the richest and biggest tech
firms in the world? As county
leaders, you have an
opportunity to keep our bills
from rising and ensure
Dominion doesn't build this
dirty gas plant in our
backyard.
Our neighbors who live
especially close to the
proposed gas plant have
endured almost 80 years of
toxic air pollution from
Dominion’s coal plant which
was just retired last year.
Why should they, and all of
us, be subjected to another
30-40 years of toxic air
pollutants from this gas
plant when Dominion can
invest in solar, wind, energy
storage and efficiency to
meet our future energy needs.
The Virginia DEQ requires
Elysia Reed Bermuda
09/25/2024 Page 58 of 63
Comment Type Comment Name District
counties to determine the
suitability of major
pollution sources like this
gas plant in local
communities before it will
grant an air pollution
permit. Chesterfield has
greenlighted this gas plant
without determining the
suitability of the site and
its impact on the surrounding
community of largely lower
income and people of color.
Dominion’s gas plant raises
serious questions related to
environmental justice that
our county has an obligation
to consider in determining if
this site is suitable. There
are also serious questions
whether Dominion has
necessary zoning approval for
this gas plant.
Under the VA Clean Economy
Act, Dominion Energy is
supposed to phase out its
reliance on gas and coal
fired power plants by 2045 to
address climate change. This
new gas plant with an
expected operational lifespan
through 2060 and beyond is
inconsistent with that law.
With all the concerns raised
by residents regarding this
gas plant, why is the county
signing off on this project
that raises serious questions
as to its compliance with
state law? Residents deserve
to have their concerns heard
by their supervisors in a
county public hearing.
Unscheduled
matter
Subject: Dominion Energy's
proposed gas plant
Dear Supervisor Holland,
The residents of Chesterfield
County deserve a hearing and
a vote on Dominion Energy’s
dirty gas power plant. The
Virginia Department of
Environmental Quality
requires counties to
determine the suitability of
major pollution sources like
this gas plant in local
communities before it will
grant an air pollution
permit. Chesterfield County
Alisa Booze
Troetschel
Dale
09/25/2024 Page 59 of 63
Comment Type Comment Name District
has greenlighted this gas
plant without determining the
suitability of the site and
its impact on the surrounding
community of largely lower
income and people of color.
Dominion’s gas plant raises
serious questions related to
environmental justice that
our county has an obligation
to consider in determining if
this site is suitable.
Friends of Chesterfield has
also raised serious questions
whether a Dominion has
necessary zoning approval for
this gas plant. Chesterfield
County residents deserve a
hearing and a vote on both
the zoning and the
suitability of this gas
plant.
On September 25th, I expect
the board to announce that it
will schedule a hearing and a
vote on Dominion’s dirty gas
plant.
Cordially,
Alisa Booze Troetschel
Zoning case
- 23SN0114 –
Collington
Neighborhood
Recreational
Facility –
Matoaca
REGARDING: CASE 23sn0114- I
emailed my concerns to this
address for the July planning
meeting, but they were not
read or addressed. It was
acknowledged but not
addressed. I was at the
August meeting but the case
was deferred until 9/25. I
will be out of the country
that date, so I called one of
the Board members to discuss
the case and left a message,
but never heard back from
him. There hasn't been a lot
of Brandy Oaks people in
attendance, and I have to
wonder if it's because
they're discouraged because
no one seems to care and they
feel that it's a done deal.
Nevertheless, my concerns
are:
1. There are 17+ acres for
that property, so why can't
the RV storage area be
located far enough back from
the road so it cannot be seen
from Hensley road? That would
also eliminate the problem of
being adjacent to the
Velma Brown Matoaca
09/25/2024 Page 60 of 63
Comment Type Comment Name District
neighboring properties.
2. Collington said they will
put a fence around the
storage area that will be a
minimum of six feet high,
which obviously mean they
will settle for the least
expensive and make the fence
six feet. Upon further
research, I find that the
average RV is seven to twelve
feet high, so the vehicles
will be in plain sight. Can
they make it 12?
3. As it stands now, the
property is not maintained,
but the legal counsel for
Collington said at the July
meeting that the proposed
facility will benefit Brandy
Oaks residence because it
will be maintained as a
requirement of a Chesterfield
County code. Collington has
owned this property for nine
years and it has never been
properly maintained. That
being said, how can we trust
Collington to adhere to that
code, since they never have,
and Collington residence are
not impacted at all, This
code has never been enforced,
so who will enforce this now?
4. At the last meeting, a
Brandy Oaks Board member
talked about the
environmental hazard from
possible leaking vehicles
which is a great concern.
Should this occur Collington
won't be concerned because
it's not near their homes and
families. Brandy Oaks
residence won't have access
to the property, so we can't
report the issue, and who
would we report it to?
5. I am not against the
recreational facility,
however I think it is so
unfair that we have to
contend with this RV storage
eye sore while Collington
reap the benefits with no
negative impact. Move it away
from our homes and the county
road.
Velma Brown
Brandy Oaks Residence
(Clerk note: this comment was
09/25/2024 Page 61 of 63
Comment Type Comment Name District
received via email to the
Planning Department.)
Unscheduled
matter
Eryn Little continues to
remain without Access to
Education in simply, a Public
School, and this begins year
3. Not only has the School
Board lost Grant Funding
already, due to non-
compliance issues, there may
be quite a bit more
forthcoming. I have clear
evidence of inappropriate,
unethical, and unlawful
collusions which created and
have maintained this ongoing
issue of illegally denying
Access to Education to a
scholar with disabilities.
Unfortunately, some of the
same verbiage, tactics, and
massive resistance techniques
seem to have infiltrated some
of the departments in
Chesterfield County, as is my
understanding. Sadly, just
like as with the School
Board/School Division, there
are quite likely 'happenings'
in your organization as a
County Government that 'bad
actors' of course would not
want to be exposed or shared
with leadership positions. I
would argue that it is
imperative that Chesterfield
County Board of Supervisors
closely scrutinize Legal
Invoicing attributable to
Eryn Little billed to the
School Board in your role as
the 'provider and supervisory
ownership of taxpayer funds,
to infer how their
expenditures with Sands
Anderson and Blankingship &
Keith Law are proper use of
Taxpayer funding.
Wendy Little
(Eryn's Mom)
Wendy Little Clover Hill
09/25/2024 Page 62 of 63
Carey L. Allen
5939 E Stonepath Garden Drive Chester, VA
23831 careyallen69@gmail.com
804-640-3510
September 24, 2024
Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors
P.O. Box 40
Chesterfield, VA 23832
Dear Members of the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors,
I’m writing to express my support for the Woodpecker Road Solar project, an 8MW solar
energy facility in the Matoaca District. This project presents a valuable opportunity to
introduce clean energy to the area while preserving the district's rural character.
The project, developed by RWE, a well-regarded company with national experience, has
already been unanimously recommended for approval by the Planning Commission.
Commissioner Tommy Owens noted that the solar facility is a reasonable development
alternative for the property, ensuring minimal impact on the area's rural character.
This solar project is a more sustainable and less disruptive option compared to a residential
subdivision, which would increase traffic and strain public services like schools. Additionally,
many neighboring residents are in favor of the project, recognizing solar energy as a practical
alternative.
I encourage the Board to approve this project, as it strikes a good balance between
addressing our energy needs and maintaining the rural character of the Matoaca District.
Thank you for your time and consideration. I look forward to your decision. Sincerely,
Carey L. Allen
09/25/2024 Page 63 of 63