2024-10-30 Packet
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
CHESTERFIELD, VIRGINIA 23832
AGENDA
October 30, 2024
BOARD OF
SUPERVISORS
JAMES HOLLAND
CHAIR
DALE DISTRICT
MARK S. MILLER, Ph.D.
VICE CHAIR
MIDLOTHIAN DISTRICT
JIM INGLE
BERMUDA DISTRICT
JESSICA L. SCHNEIDER
CLOVER HILL DISTRICT
KEVIN P. CARROLL
MATOACA DISTRICT
JOSEPH P. CASEY, Ph.D.
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
2 p.m. Work Session - Administration Building, Room 502
1. Approval of Minutes
2. Requests to Postpone Agenda Items and Additions, Deletions or Changes in the Order of
Presentation
3. Everyday Excellence - County Attorney's Office
4. Work Sessions
A. Sports, Visitation & Entertainment Annual Update
B. Economic Mobility Update
C. Social Services Annual Update
D. Consent Agenda Highlights
5. Reports
A. Reports on the Status of District Improvement Operating and Capital Funds, General Fund
Unassigned Balance and Debt Policy Ratios, and Investments
6. Fifteen-Minute Citizen Comment Period on Unscheduled Matters
7. Closed Session
A. Closed Session 1) Pursuant to § 2.2-3711(A)(5), Code of Virginia, 1950, as Amended, to
Discuss or Consider Prospective Businesses or Industries or the Expansion of Existing
Businesses or Industries Where no Previous Announcement has Been Made of the Businesses’
or Industries’ Interest in Locating or Expanding Their Facilities in the Community, 2) Pursuant
to § 2.2-3711(A)(3), Code of Virginia, 1950, as Amended, to Discuss the Acquisition by the
County of Real Estate for a Public Purpose, or the Disposition of Publicly Held Real Property,
Where Discussion in an Open Meeting Would Adversely Affect The Bargaining Position and
Negotiating Strategy of the Public Body, 3) Pursuant to § 2.2-3711(A)(29), Code of Virginia,
1950, as Amended, to Discuss the Award of a Public Contract Involving the Expenditure of
Public Funds Where Discussion in Open Session Would Adversely Affect the Bargaining
Page 1 of 295
Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors Meeting
October 30, 2024
Position or Negotiating Strategy of the Public Body, and 4) Pursuant to § 2.2-
3711(A)(1), Code of Virginia, 1950, as Amended, Relating to the Performance of the County
Attorney
8. Recess for Dinner with the Chesterfield-Colonial Heights Social Services Board
6 p.m. Evening Session - Public Meeting Room, 10001 Iron Bridge Road
9. Invocation by the Honorable James M. Holland, Dale District Supervisor
10. Pledge of Allegiance Led by Matt Harris, Deputy County Administrator
11. County Administration Update
12. Board Member Reports
13. Resolutions and Special Recognitions
A. Resolution Recognizing Corporal D. Elliott Anderson Jr., Police Department, Upon His
Retirement
B. Recognizing Specialized Emergency Response Teams that Deployed to Southwest Virginia
During Hurricane Helene
14. New Business
A. Confirmation of the Selection of a Chief of Police for Chesterfield County
B. Appointments
1. Board of Building and Fire Code Appeals
2. Camp Baker Management Board
C. Consent Items (14.C.1.-14.C.7.)
1. Adoption of Resolutions
a. Resolution Recognizing Kenneth Hilscher, Utilities Department, Upon His
Retirement
b. Resolution Recognizing Battalion Chief Mark R. Berry, Fire and Emergency
Medical Services Department, Upon His Retirement
c. Resolution Recognizing Mrs. Jean Skinner, Department of General Services,
Administration Division, Upon Her Retirement
d. Resolution Recognizing the 175th Anniversary of Enon Baptist Church
2. Real Property Requests
a. Acceptance of Parcels of Land
1. Acceptance of Parcels of Land Adjacent to Whitepine Road from 8800
Whitepine, LLC
Page 2 of 295
Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors Meeting
October 30, 2024
2. Acceptance of a Parcel of Land Adjacent to Otterdale Road from
Windswept Development LLC
3. Acceptance of a Parcel of Land Adjacent to East West Road from
Watkins Center MOB, LLC
b. Conveyance of Easements
1. Conveyance of a 15' Easement to Virginia Electric and Power Company
for Beulah Recreation Center
c. Requests for Permission
1. Request Permission to Allow an Existing Private Water Service Within
a Proposed Private Water Easement to Serve the Property at 5020 Route
1
d. Requests to Quitclaim
1. Request to Quitclaim a Portion of a Temporary Reduced Imperviousness
Best Management Practices (BMP) Easement and a Sewer Easement
Across the Property Owned by Woolridge Vet Partners, LLC
2. Request to Quitclaim Portions of a 16’ Water Easement and a Variable
Width Sewer and Water Easement Across the Properties Owned by
Economic Development Authority of the County of Chesterfield
e. Approve a Lease Amendment for the Dry Bridge 911 Tower Site
3. Set Public Hearing for December 18
a. To Consider the Quitclaim of a Portion of Creekstone Point Avenue
b. To Consider the Exercise of Eminent Domain for the Woolridge Road (Route
288 to Old Hundred Road) Extension Project Right-of-Way and Easement
Acquisition
c. To Consider Approval of Lease Extension for 6737 Public Safety Way to the
Virginia Credit Union
4. Approve the Purchase of, and Initiate the Zoning Process for, a Parcel of Land at 15601
Route 1 for the Appomattox Police Precinct Project
5. Transfer Funds and Grant Authorization to Proceed with Rockwood Park Access Road
6. Acceptance of State Roads
7. Approval of Fifth Amendment to the Employment Agreement for the County
Administrator
15. Fifteen-Minute Citizen Comment Period on Unscheduled Matters
16. Deferred Items from Previous Meetings
Page 3 of 295
Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors Meeting
October 30, 2024
17. Zoning Cases
A. Withdrawals
B. Deferrals
1. 23SN0041 - North Hallsley - Midlothian
C. Consent Cases
1. 24SN1125 - Olson Home Based Surveying Firm - Dale
2. 24SN1129 - Holland Farm Animal - Dale
3. 24SN1143 - Cabral Dwelling - Midlothian
D. Discussion Cases
18. Public Hearings
A. To Consider an Ordinance to Amend the Zoning Ordinance Relative to Chesapeake Bay
Preservation Areas
B. To Consider an Ordinance to Amend the Zoning Ordinance Relative to Public Notice
C. To Consider an Ordinance to Amend the Zoning Ordinance Relative to Vested Rights and
Nonconforming Uses
D. To Consider Continuation of Lease of Henricus Historical Park with the Henricus Foundation
E. To Consider the Lease of County Property Adjacent to the Meadowville Wastewater Pump
Station at 1398 Bermuda Hundred Road
19. Fifteen-Minute Citizen Comment Period on Unscheduled Matters
20. Adjournment
A. Adjournment and Notice of Next Scheduled Meeting of the Board of Supervisors
Page 4 of 295
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Meeting Date: October 30, 2024 Item Number: 4.A.
Subject:
Sports, Visitation & Entertainment Annual Update
Board Action Requested:
Summary of Information:
This work session will review the Sports, Visitation & Entertainment Department's first full fiscal year and will
highlight updated tourism data, current and future venue development projects in conjunction with Parks &
Recreation, and the County's path forward in increasing quality of life and diversifying the economy and tax
base through visitor spending. This work session will also feature announcements about the 2025 Chesterfield
Restaurant Week, 2025 Chesterfield Outdoor Fest, and the launch of a multi-asset history campaign.
Attachments:
None
Preparer: J.C. Poma, Managing Director - Sports and Entertainment
Approved By:
Page 5 of 295
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Meeting Date: October 30, 2024 Item Number: 4.B.
Subject:
Economic Mobility Update
Board Action Requested:
Summary of Information:
Economic Mobility, also referred to as upward mobility, focuses on three areas: dignity & belonging, economic
success, and power & autonomy. The work session will open with an overview from Jovan Burton, Chair of
Greater Richmond Continuum of Care, followed by Kelly King Horne, Executive Director of Homeward. Next,
Karen O'Brien, Executive Director of Caritas and Beth Vann-Turnbull, Executive Director of Housing Families
First will present an update from their organizations' perspectives. The collective group will discuss economic
mobility as it relates to topics such as homelessness, housing, workforce development, etc.
Attachments:
1. Presentation
Preparer: James Worsley, Deputy County Administrator
Approved By:
Page 6 of 295
Economic Mobility
October 30, 2024
Page 7 of 295
Economic mobility refers to the
ability of individuals or families
to move up or down the
economic ladder over time,
which can be influenced by
factors such as education,
employment opportunities,
and wealth accumulation.
Economic
Mobility
Education
Healthcare
Income
Shelter
Social
Connection
Food
Page 8 of 295
Greater
Richmond
Continuum of
Care
Presentation:
Chesterfield
County
•Kelly King Horne, Homeward
•Beth Vann-Turnbull, Housing
Families First
•Karen O’Brien, CARITAS
•Jovan Burton, GRCoC Board
Chair
www.endhomelessnessrva.org
Page 9 of 295
Greater Richmond Continuum of Care (GRCoC)
4
Map retrieved from
http://www.richmondregional.org/
Page 10 of 295
Doing more together
•Through partnerships with the
coordinated and compassionate
members of the Greater Richmond
Continuum of Care, we have found
permanent housing for more than
13,080 unique individuals in the past
12 years (July 2012 to June 2024.
•Each day, GRCoC providers support
more than 1,000 regional residents
in shelter and permanent housing
programs.
Page 11 of 295
Page 12 of 295
Targeted
housing focus in
the midst of
multiple
systemic crises
(1) an affordable housing crisis,
(2) an epidemic of deadly drug
use, and
3) a mental health crisis
including rising rates of suicide.
Currently, America is in the grips
of three simultaneous, reinforcing
crises:
Taken from a 2023 SAMHSA report:
https://www.samhsa.gov/sites/default/file
s/intersection-recovery-housing-housing-
executive-summary.pdf
Page 13 of 295
Page 14 of 295
What works to
solve
homelessness?
?
Coordination of efforts across a community with a shared
goal of housing stability (and connection to resources and
services)
Clear pathway for people to get connected to resources
Targeted efforts to support
households least likely to seek
assistance
Street outreach
Dedicated call line
Triage through other services
Low barrier shelter programs
Housing-focused case
management; housing
navigation services
Understand housing history and barriers
•Credit; rental history
Focus on preferences within local
choices or options
Page 15 of 295
Bringing Families Home: Impact & Future Growth
Proven Success Since 2020
301
Family Members
Served
Including 189 children
75%
Housing Success
Rate
Permanent housing within ~60 days
<3%
End Up in
Shelter
Lasting solutions
New ARPA Investment Impact Through 2026
45+ Households 165+ People
Will secure stable housing CCPS students & family members
Sustaining this momentum requires ongoing support beyond
ARPA funding.
Page 16 of 295
Chesterfield & CARITAS
•5 – 6% of participants are CC
Residents
•10 yrs. of support
Annual Support 2014 – 2023 $30,000
per year; 2024 $50,000 per year
•This represents .5% of our annual
budget
•Cost to shelter, feed, case manage,
prepare for workforce, and place in
housing has increased significantly
Our Ask
•Fund proven programs
•Partner
Recovery Housing expertise
Workforce program
OUR GOAL
Every person leaves with more than
when they entered – more tools,
more resources, more support, and
more hope.
Page 17 of 295
Creation of a targeted
prevention fund (ex:
$250,000 for prevention
programs to stop county
residents from becoming
unsheltered)
Invest in Permanent
Supportive Housing
(regional gap of 350 units
currently)
Public support to maintain
service levels
$500,000 for emergency shelter
operations
$200,000 for 4 full-time housing
navigators
$90,000 to support outreach
services
Flexible funding to resolve
homelessness (ex: $200,000
to support exits from shelter)
40 households exiting shelter,
opening shelter beds for unsheltered
residents
Assumes avg. of $5,000 to help an
individual exit shelter
Source: GRCoC Investment Strategy; Homeward Gaps Analysis; www.endhomelessnessrva.org
Strategies to Reduce & Prevent Homelessness
Page 18 of 295
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Meeting Date: October 30, 2024 Item Number: 4.C.
Subject:
Social Services Annual Update
Board Action Requested:
Summary of Information:
On behalf of the Chesterfield-Colonial Heights Board of Social Services, staff will present information
describing performance achievements, community partnerships and collaborations, and FY24
accomplishments.
Attachments:
1. Presentation
Preparer: Kiva Rogers, Director
Approved By:
Page 19 of 295
Annual Social
Services Board
Presentation
October 30, 2024
Page 20 of 295
Creating
connections
that transform
lives
VISION:
Our vision is to be the leader in providing
exceptional and innovative social services.
MISSION:
In collaboration with individuals, families and the
community, our mission is to provide advocacy and
excellent services that encourage self-sufficiency;
preserve and restore families; and protect the well-
being of children, senior citizens and people with
disabilities
Page 21 of 295
Our Rockstars
16 Promotions 1st Family
Services
CDP
5 LPC
Graduates
$20,000
Grant
Award
2 Substance
Abuse
Fellows
Page 22 of 295
Employee
Wellbeing/
Engagement
•Board of Supervisor Tours
•Trauma Informed Leadership Team (TILT)
•Learning series
•Yoga offered in partnership with My
Fitness Matters
•Massages offered in partnership with
Chester Family Chiropractic Center
•Nursing mother space designed in
partnership with Clover Hill Church
Page 23 of 295
FY 24
Customer
Contact
Walk -Ins 27,984 visitors
10% increase
Switchboard Calls 116,581 calls
30% increase
DSS Docs Emails
72,542 email
documents
10% decrease
Page 24 of 295
Economic mobility refers to the
ability of individuals or families
to move up or down the
economic ladder over time,
which can be influenced by
factors such as education,
employment opportunities,
and wealth accumulation.
Economic
Mobility
Education
Healthcare
Income
Shelter
Social
Connection
Food
Page 25 of 295
Shelter:
Housing Prevention &
Rehousing
Page 26 of 295
*Experiencing
Associated
Risks
Court
Involvement
- Eviction
Evicted
Housing Insecurity Continuum
Doubled Up
Sleeping
in Car
Living in
Shelter
Hotel Living Outside
*Associated Risk factors- job loss, domestic violence, divorce, unaddressed mental health,
substance abuse, health challenges
Prevention & Housing
Page 27 of 295
Housing – Prevention
Assisted 715 individuals
served who were at risk or
lost housing during FY 24
Utility Assistance
Programs: Dominion
Energy Share, Energy
Assistance Program,
Percentage of Income
Payment Program (PIPP)
$300,000 continued
investment in eviction
prevention administered
by Area Congregation
Together in Service (ACTS)
Page 28 of 295
Housing – Permanent Housing Efforts
Member of County’s Strategic
Planning for Individuals in
Need or Transition
(S.P.R.I.N.T) Team
Collaborated to assist 715
individuals at risk of losing,
lost housing or in need of
housing assistance
448 Housing Choice
Vouchers Program
participants
$300,000 continued
investment in Housing
Families First’s Bringing
Families Home program
Page 29 of 295
Income:
Employment
Page 30 of 295
Employment
SNAP Education & Training (E&T)
1st Full Employment participant
Hosted Career & Resource Fair
Child Care Updates
Page 31 of 295
Impact Stories
•SNAP Education & Training
success story in collaboration
with Brightpoint College
•Virginia Initiative for Employment
& Work (VIEW) success story
Page 32 of 295
Healthcare:
Medical Assistance
Page 33 of 295
Congratulations to Benefit
Programs staff who processed
24,170 overdue Medicaid
renewals resulting from the
Public Health Emergency
declaration March 2020
24,170
Medicaid
renewals
processed!
Page 34 of 295
Healthcare: Medical Assistance
90,658 Medical Assistance
recipients – slight decrease in
recipients
30% increase in applications
- applicants could be new
applicants as well as those
reapplying
Page 35 of 295
Food: Supplemental
Nutrition Assistance
Program (SNAP)
Page 36 of 295
Food: Strategic Focus on Seniors
CDBG helped to expand
Chesterfield Food Bank
Outreach Center’s
services for seniors
Collaborative public and
private partner group
being established to
explore food insecurity
among seniors.
Page 37 of 295
American Public Human Services
Association
Economic Mobility & Well-being Conference
Page 38 of 295
Economic
Mobility:
Prevention
& Well-
being
•40% increase in Adult Protective
Services investigations - 1377
investigations
•21% increase in Child Protective
Services investigations and family
assessments – 983 investigations
and FAs
•13% increase in children served
through Children’s Services Act
(CSA) – 310 children served
Page 39 of 295
Mission In Action:
In collaboration with
individuals, families and the
community, our mission is to provide
advocacy and excellent services that
encourage self-sufficiency; preserve
and restore families; and protect the
well-being of children, senior citizens
and people with disabilities
Page 40 of 295
Collaboration allows us to merge our strengths and accomplish something greater
than we could individually.” - Unknown
Page 41 of 295
Closing Impact
Story
Page 42 of 295
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Meeting Date: October 30, 2024 Item Number: 5.A.
Subject:
Reports on the Status of District Improvement Operating and Capital Funds, General Fund Unassigned Balance
and Debt Policy Ratios, and Investments
Board Action Requested:
Accept the attached District Improvement Operating and Capital Funds, General Fund Unassigned Fund
Balance and Debt Policy Ratios, and Monthly Investment Reports.
Summary of Information:
The attached reports detail the proposed uses of District Improvement Operating and Capital Funds, the status
of the current General Fund Unassigned Fund Balance and Debt Policy Ratios, and Monthly Investment
Updates.
The Board is requested to accept these reports, and acceptance of the District Improvement Operating and
Capital Report will serve as approval for staff to expend District Improvement Funds for the proposed uses as
listed.
Additional financial and economic statistical information is available via the Key Financial Indicators
dashboard published via the County's website.
Attachments:
1. DIF Report and August 2024 Investment Report
Preparer:
Approved By:
Page 43 of 295
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
District Improvement Operating and Capital Funds
Monthly Report
Report Date: October 2024
The County annually budgets District Improvement Operating and Capital Funds for each of the five
magisterial districts that are used to improve the quality of life in each district. Two funding allocations
are established per district:
•$33,500 per district in the General Fund to provide funding for operational support (e.g.,
public events or programs, purchase of county-owned equipment, public school
programs, or other legally allowable expenses
•$500,000 per district in the County’s Capital Improvement Fund to provide funding for
long-term or large-scale expenditures (e.g., pedestrian improvements, improvements to
school amenities and facilities, park improvements)
If funds remain unspent at the end of each fiscal year, operational funds are automatically reserved to
be utilized in a future year, with capital funds automatically carrying over into the next fiscal year.
This report shows this month’s use of such funds as well as the current funding available for each district.
Requests to use funds for the current month are detailed below and listed as a proposed use on the
summary chart for that district. Upon Board of Supervisors acceptance of this report each month, staff
will execute the proposed requests.
Acceptance of this report by the Board constitutes Board approval of this request.
District Improvement Fund Balances and Requests:
Bermuda Operating Capital
Current Balance $98,506.87 $1,216,732.68
Field Lining Machine 2,100.00
AED Equipment for Multiple Public Facilities 10,500.00
Streetlight installation on Dell Hill Court 3,056.52
Remaining Balance $95,450.35 $1,204,132.68
Clover Hill Operating Capital
Current Balance $102,793.80 $796,820.00
AED Equipment for Multiple Public Facilities 10,500.00
Remaining Balance $102,793.80 $786,320.00
Page 44 of 295
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
District Improvement Operating and Capital Funds
Monthly Report
Dale Operating Capital
Current Balance $150,830.83 $1,022,200.00
AED Equipment for Multiple Public Facilities 10,500.00
Remaining Balance $150,830.83 $1,011,700.00
Matoaca Operating Capital
Current Balance $85,273.06 $971,586.99
AED Equipment for Multiple Public Facilities 10,500.00
Cosby High School Fieldhouse Paint and Flooring Repairs 55,000.00
Remaining Balance $85,273.06 $906,086.99
Midlothian Operating Capital
Current Balance $185,444.13 $905,518.00
AED Equipment for Multiple Public Facilities 10,500.00
Roxshire Park Construction 300,000.00
Remaining Balance $185,444.13 $595,018.00
Page 45 of 295
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
General Fund Unassigned Fund Balance
And Debt Policy Ratios
Report Date: October 2024
Ratio Actual
June 30, 2023
Planning
Cap
Planning
Ceiling
Debt as a Percentage of Assessed Value(1) 1.31% 2.50% 3.00%(ceiling)
Debt to Personal Income 3.47% 5.00% 6.00% (ceiling)
Debt Service as a Percentage of General
Government Expenditures
6.42% 10.00% 11.00% (ceiling)
Unassigned General Fund Balance as a
Percentage of General Fund Expenditures
8.71% 8.50% 6.50% (floor)
10 Year Payout Ratio 66.46% 65.00% 60.00% (floor)
(1) Ratio calculations include general obligation bonds, certificates of participation, taxable revenue note, development
agreements, public facility lease and obligations under capital lease. Excludes issuance premium or discount, Economic
Development Authority special assessment revenue notes and Enterprise Fund obligations.
63,004,400 63,004,400
64,800,400 70,800,400 73,800,400
86,050,400
-
10,000,000
20,000,000
30,000,000
40,000,000
50,000,000
60,000,000
70,000,000
80,000,000
90,000,000
100,000,000
2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025
Unassigned Fund Balance
Page 46 of 295
MONTHLY
INVESTMENT
REPORT
REBECCA R. LONGNAKER, CPA, MGT
TREASURER
P.O. BOX 70
CHESTERFIELD, VA 23832
Office: 804-748-1201
Email: longnakerr@chesterfield.gov
www.chesterfield.gov/treasurer
AUGUST 2024
This investment report for August 2024 is presented in
accordance with the Treasurer’s Investment Policy. The
objectfve of the policy is to obtain the highest possible yield on available
financial assets, consistent with constraints imposed by safety objectfves,
cash flow consideratfons and the laws of the Commonwealth of Virginia that
restrict the placement of public funds. All investments held are in
compliance with this policy.
Investments at a glance (as of 8/31/2024)
Total Value at Cost $1,455,356,923.92
Average Days to Maturity 534
Yield to Maturity 365 Day Equivalent 4.68%
Cash Balance $104,016,035.51
Cumulatfve Investment Earnings FY2025 (000’s)
Investment earnings through August 2024
far exceed prior years. Inflatfon has
remained high keeping short term yields
high. However, the Federal Reserve
reduced rates by 50 basis points in
September, and more cuts are expected
by year end. Investment earnings consist
of cash payments only and do not reflect
the impact of amortfzed discounts and
premiums, nor do they reflect unrealized
gains and losses. The current portiolio
consists of securitfes purchased at
premiums and discounts which will not be
recognized untfl maturity.
Portiolio Mix Balance
Local Govt. Invest. Pool (LGIP) $75,247,458.49
Virginia Investment Pool (VIP) $409,043,164.17
Federal Agency Discount $182,261,951.00
Federal Agency Coupon $182,250,000.00
Municipal Bond $5,019,850.00
Corporate Bond $576,493,982.77
Commercial Paper $0.00
Certfficate of Deposit $25,040,517.49
US Treasury Discount $0.00
Total $1,455,356,923.92
Investment Type Allocatfon
Local Govt Invest
Pool (LGIP),
5.17%
Virginia Investment
Pool (VIP), 28.11%
Fed. Agency
Discount, 12.52%
Fed. Agency
Coupon, 12.52%Corporate
Bond,
39.62%
Cert of Deposit,
1.72%
Municipal Bond,
0.34%
$3,619
$1,500
$2,226
$2,936
$6,814
$10,398
$0
$2,000
$4,000
$6,000
$8,000
$10,000
$12,000
FY 2020 FY 2021 FY 2022 FY 2023 FY 2024 FY 2025
Page 47 of 295
The 91-Day Treasury Bill, 2-Year Average Treasury and the Virginia Treasury Prime Liquidity are used as benchmarks for the
County’s portiolio performance. For the month of August, the County outperformed one of the yield benchmarks and two of
the year over year change benchmarks. Short term yields remain high to combat inflatfon and the portiolio is invested in lon ger
term investments with lower yields.
YIELD BENCHMARKING
CURRENT YIELD ONE YEAR AGO YoY CHANGE
Portiolio 4.68% 3.47% 1.21% pts
91-day T-Bill 5.30% 5.56% -0.26% pts
2-Year Avg Treasury 4.52% 3.05% 1.47% pts
Va. Treas. Prime Liq. 4.70% 4.51% 0.19% pts
Code of Virginia Treasurer’s Investment Policy
Investment Category Maximum
Maturity
Authorized
% Limit
Ratfng
Requirement
Maximum
Maturity
Authorized
% Limit
Ratfng
Requirement
Aug
Actual %
Local Government Investment Pool (LGIP) N/A 100% N/A N/A 100% N/A 5.17%
Virginia Investment Pool Trust Fund (VIP) N/A 100% N/A N/A 100% N/A 28.11%
Federal Agency Discount No Limit 100% N/A 5 Years 100% N/A 12.52%
Federal Agency Coupon No Limit 100% N/A 5 Years 100% N/A 12.52%
Municipal Bonds No Limit 100% N/A 5 Years 100% N/A 0.34%
Corporate Bonds 5 Years 100% AA/Aa 5 Years 100% AA/Aa 39.62%
Commercial Paper 270 Days 35% A1/P1/F1/D1 270 Days 35% A1/P1/F1/D1 0.00%
Certfficate of Deposit 1 Year 100% A1/P1/AA/Aa 1 Year 100% A1/P1/AA/Aa 1.72%
U.S. Treasury Discount No Limit 100% N/A 5 Years 100% N/A 0.00%
Compliance Report
Understanding Key Investment Terms
Local Government
Investment Pool (LGIP)
A State-administered fund that enables governmental entftfes to realize the economies of large-scale investfng and
professional funds management.
Virginia Investment Pool
Trust Fund (VIP)
A fund, administered by the Virginia Municipal League (VML) and Virginia Associatfon of Countfes (VACo), that
provides politfcal subdivisions of the Commonwealth of Virginia the ability to pool their funds and invest under the
directfon and daily supervision of a professional fund manager.
Federal Agency Discount Fixed income government agency obligatfons priced below par and maturing in more than one year.
Federal Agency Coupon Fixed income government agency obligatfons with a stated interest rate and maturing in more than one year.
Municipal Bonds Fixed income obligatfons of state and local governments with a maturity of one week to 30 years.
Corporate Bonds Corporate Bonds are debt securitfes issued by publicly-held corporatfons to raise money for expansion or other busi-
ness needs with a ratfng from at least two agencies of Aa by Moody’s Investor Service, Inc., AA by Standard and
Poors, Inc. or AA by Fitch, and a maturity of no more than five years.
Commercial Paper “Prime Quality” paper with a maturity of 270 days or less and rated at least prime 1, A-1, or F-1 by the major credit
ratfng agencies.
Certfficate of Deposit Negotfable certfficates of deposits of domestfc banks and domestfc offices of foreign banks with a ratfng of at least
A-1 or P-1 for maturitfes one year or less, and AA or Aa for maturitfes over one year and not exceeding five years.
U.S. Treasury Discount Fixed income government securitfes priced below par and maturing in less than one year.
Benchmark Comparisons
The Treasurer’s Investment Policy specifies limits on categories of investments to obtain diversificatfon and avoid incurring
unreasonable risk inherent in over -investfng in specific instruments. The County’s Investment Portiolio is in full compliance with
the Treasurer’s Investment Policy.
Page 48 of 295
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Meeting Date: October 30, 2024 Item Number: 7.A.
Subject:
Closed Session 1) Pursuant to § 2.2-3711(A)(5), Code of Virginia, 1950, as Amended, to Discuss or Consider
Prospective Businesses or Industries or the Expansion of Existing Businesses or Industries Where no Previous
Announcement has Been Made of the Businesses’ or Industries’ Interest in Locating or Expanding Their
Facilities in the Community, 2) Pursuant to § 2.2-3711(A)(3), Code of Virginia, 1950, as Amended, to Discuss
the Acquisition by the County of Real Estate for a Public Purpose, or the Disposition of Publicly Held Real
Property, Where Discussion in an Open Meeting Would Adversely Affect The Bargaining Position and
Negotiating Strategy of the Public Body, 3) Pursuant to § 2.2-3711(A)(29), Code of Virginia, 1950, as
Amended, to Discuss the Award of a Public Contract Involving the Expenditure of Public Funds Where
Discussion in Open Session Would Adversely Affect the Bargaining Position or Negotiating Strategy of the
Public Body, and 4) Pursuant to § 2.2-3711(A)(1), Code of Virginia, 1950, as Amended, Relating to the
Performance of the County Attorney
Board Action Requested:
Motion to adjourn to closed session.
Summary of Information:
Closed Session 1) Pursuant to § 2.2-3711(A)(5), Code of Virginia, 1950, as Amended, to Discuss or Consider
Prospective Businesses or Industries or the Expansion of Existing Businesses or Industries Where no Previous
Announcement has Been Made of the Businesses’ or Industries’ Interest in Locating or Expanding Their
Facilities in the Community, 2) Pursuant to § 2.2-3711(A)(3), Code of Virginia, 1950, as Amended, to Discuss
the Acquisition by the County of Real Estate for a Public Purpose, or the Disposition of Publicly Held Real
Property, Where Discussion in an Open Meeting Would Adversely Affect The Bargaining Position and
Negotiating Strategy of the Public Body, 3) Pursuant to § 2.2-3711(A)(29), Code of Virginia, 1950, as
Amended, to Discuss the Award of a Public Contract Involving the Expenditure of Public Funds Where
Discussion in Open Session Would Adversely Affect the Bargaining Position or Negotiating Strategy of the
Public Body, and 4) Pursuant to § 2.2-3711(A)(1), Code of Virginia, 1950, as Amended, Relating to the
Performance of the County Attorney.
Attachments:
None
Preparer: Jeff Mincks, County Attorney
Page 49 of 295
Approved By:
Page 50 of 295
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Meeting Date: October 30, 2024 Item Number: 13.A.
Subject:
Resolution Recognizing Corporal D. Elliott Anderson Jr., Police Department, Upon His Retirement
Board Action Requested:
Adoption of the attached resolution.
Summary of Information:
Corporal D. Elliott Anderson Jr. retired from the Police Department after providing over 26 years of service to
the residents of Chesterfield County.
Attachments:
1. Resolution-Anderson D. Elliott-Corporal
Preparer: Brad Badgerow, Acting Chief of Police
Approved By:
Page 51 of 295
RECOGNIZING CORPORAL D. ELLIOTT ANDERSON JR. UPON HIS RETIREMENT
WHEREAS, Corporal D. Elliott Anderson Jr. retired from the
Chesterfield County Police Department on October 1, 2024 after providing
over 26 years of quality service to the residents of Chesterfield County;
and
WHEREAS, Corporal Anderson began his career with Chesterfield County
Police in 1998 as a Recruit and continued to faithfully serve as a Police
Officer, Senior Police Officer, Master Police Officer, Career Police
Officer, and Corporal; and
WHEREAS, Corporal Anderson also served during his tenure as a Police
Recruiter, General Instructor, Crisis Intervention Team Instructor, Crime
Prevention Officer, Community Engagement Officer and Peer Counselor; and
WHEREAS, Corporal Anderson earned a Unit Citation while working under
adverse working conditions for his significant contributions during the
COVID pandemic, continuing to facilitate recruiting job fairs, in-person
presentations and virtual recruiting opportunities to fully staff three
basic academies launched during that period resulting in all authorized
Police Officer positions being filled for the first time in 25 years; and
WHEREAS, Corporal Anderson was presented with a Unit Citation
recognizing his work with Law Enforcement Explorer Post 609 youth by
providing opportunities for young adults to explore law enforcement
careers through active participation in daily Police activities, with the
youth achieving in one year nearly 1000 hours of police training and
volunteer work that was completed for the police; and
WHEREAS, Corporal Anderson received a Unit Citation for his
participation with the Media Production Team for positively affecting the
Police Department’s internal and external messaging through social media,
TV and radio and digital content formats; and
WHEREAS, Corporal Anderson earned a Chief’s Commendation for his
investigation of a resident who had placed over 280 calls for service to
Police during a 4 year period, determining that the individual was
substance impaired when calls were made and he worked with the court
system to get help and counseling for the substance abuse issue, improving
the resident’s life experience and eliminating the unnecessary calls; and
WHEREAS, Corporal Anderson received an Achievement Award as a member
of an action group charged with identifying and implementing significant
improvements to the police recruiting process that when completed led to
major reductions in police officer vacancies; and
WHEREAS, Corporal Anderson was the LGBTQ+ liaison for the police
department and was instrumental in building positive relationships with
the LGBTQ+ community, using those opportunities to recruit people and
bring them into the department; and
Page 52 of 295
WHEREAS, Corporal Anderson is recognized for his strong work ethic,
his teamwork and his communications and human relations skills, all of
which he has utilized within the Police Department and in assisting
residents of Chesterfield County during his career; and
WHEREAS, Corporal Anderson has received numerous letters of
commendation, thanks and appreciation from supervisors and residents for
services rendered; and
WHEREAS, Corporal Anderson has provided the Chesterfield County
Police Department with many years of loyal and dedicated service; and
WHEREAS, Chesterfield County and the Board of Supervisors will miss
Corporal Anderson's diligent service.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chesterfield County Board of
Supervisors publicly recognizes Corporal D. Elliott Anderson Jr. and
extends on behalf of its members and the residents of Chesterfield County,
appreciation for his service to the county, congratulations upon his
retirement, and best wishes for a long and happy retirement.
AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that a copy of this resolution be
presented to Corporal Anderson, and that this resolution be permanently
recorded among the papers of this Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield
County, Virginia.
Page 53 of 295
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Meeting Date: October 30, 2024 Item Number: 13.B.
Subject:
Recognizing Specialized Emergency Response Teams that Deployed to Southwest Virginia During Hurricane
Helene
Board Action Requested:
Recognize members of the Central Virginia Incident Management Team (CVIMT), Virginia Urban Search and
Rescue Task Force 8 (VATF-8) and the Virginia Helicopter Aquatics Rescue Team (VAHART) that deployed
to Grayson, Washington, and Wythe counties to assist those impacted by devastating floods resulting from
Hurricane Helene. Those being recognized include team members from Chesterfield Fire & EMS (CFEMS)
and the Virginia Army Air National Guard.
Summary of Information:
Attachments:
None
Preparer: Loy Senter, Fire Chief
Approved By:
Page 54 of 295
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Meeting Date: October 30, 2024 Item Number: 14.A.
Subject:
Confirmation of the Selection of a Chief of Police for Chesterfield County
Board Action Requested:
Confirm the selection of a new Chesterfield County Chief of Police, effective October 31, 2024.
Summary of Information:
In order to confirm the Board's public announcement, the Board must take a public vote selecting the new
Chesterfield County Chief of Police, effective October 31, 2024.
Attachments:
None
Preparer: Jeff Mincks, County Attorney
Approved By:
Page 55 of 295
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Meeting Date: October 30, 2024 Item Number: 14.B.1.
Subject:
Board of Building and Fire Code Appeals
Board Action Requested:
Reappointment of one member to the Board of Building and Fire Code Appeals.
Summary of Information:
The term of one regular member of the Board of Building and Fire Code Appeals that fulfills the registered
design professional position expires November 19, 2024. That member is Mr. Michael C. Bricker of the
Midlothian district. Mr. Bricker has expressed interest in reappointment to the Board of Building and Fire Code
Appeals.
Re-appointment of Mr. Bricker will maintain the composition of membership as previously established by the
Board of Supervisors for the Board of Building and Fire Code Appeals and will comply with Virginia law
regarding makeup of the board. Board members concur with the reappointment of Mr. Bricker effective
November 20, 2024, and expiring November 19, 2027.
Under the existing Rules of Procedure, appointments to boards and committees may be nominated and
appointed at the same meeting. Nominees are voted on in the order in which they are nominated.
Attachments:
None
Preparer: Ron Clements, Director
Approved By:
Page 56 of 295
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Meeting Date: October 30, 2024 Item Number: 14.B.2.
Subject:
Camp Baker Management Board
Board Action Requested:
Nominate and appoint Ms. Rachel Fenton as the Bermuda District Representative to the Camp Baker
Management Board with a term effective through April 30, 2025.
Summary of Information:
The Camp Baker Management Board has the responsibility of overseeing and monitoring the operation of
Camp Baker.
Due to the resignation of Ms. Carissa Russo, there exists a vacancy for a Bermuda District representative. Ms.
Rachel Fenton has expressed a willingness to serve in this capacity, and Supervisor Ingle recommends her
nomination and appointment. All Board members have indicated support for this appointment.
Under the existing Rules of Procedure, appointments to boards and committees may be nominated and
appointed at the same meeting. Nominees are voted on in the order in which they are nominated.
Attachments:
None
Preparer: Kelly Fried, Executive Director
Approved By:
Page 57 of 295
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Meeting Date: October 30, 2024 Item Number: 14.C.1.a.
Subject:
Resolution Recognizing Kenneth Hilscher, Utilities Department, Upon His Retirement
Board Action Requested:
Staff request the Board adopt the attached resolution.
Summary of Information:
Staff requests the Board adopt the attached resolution recognizing Kenneth Hilscher for over 41 years of
dedicated service to the Chesterfield County Utilities Department.
Attachments:
1. Hilscher - Retirement Resolution
Preparer: George Hayes, Director of Utilities
Approved By:
Page 58 of 295
RECOGNIZING KENNETH HILSCHER UPON HIS RETIREMENT
WHEREAS, Kenneth Hilscher retired from the Chesterfield County Utilities
Department on October 1, 2024, after faithfully serving the county and its citizens
for over 41 years; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Hilscher began his service to the citizens of Chesterfield County
in 1983 as a Meter Reader with the Department of Utilities in the Field Services
section; and
WHEREAS, in January of 1986, Mr. Hilscher was promoted to Senior Drafting
Technician within the Engineering Data Management section; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Hilscher developed the first Computer Aided Drafting program for
the Department of Utilities and subsequently established and applied drafting
standards for the department’s valve location diagrams; and
WHEREAS, in 1986, Mr. Hilscher designed the first logo for the Department of
Utilities, which was used until its retirement in 2024; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Hilscher utilized his drafting skills on multiple occasions to
assist the Chesterfield County Police Department in the processing of crime scenes
and the creation of presentation materials for court exhibits; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Hilscher helped promote the Department of Utilities’ first use
of electronic images, which led to the development of an electronic document
management system, the first in Chesterfield County; and
WHEREAS, in 1996, Mr. Hilscher was promoted to Engineering Assistant and began
his education and use of the department’s Geographical Information System, where
he interpreted engineering plans and electronically mapped water and wastewater
information; and
WHEREAS, in 1999, Mr. Hilscher was designated as the primary editor of easement
agreements for the Real Property Office of Chesterfield County; and
WHEREAS, in 2002, Mr. Hilscher was promoted to Geographical Information System
Specialist, continuing his support of the Real Property Office, and he also became
the Liaison between the Engineering Data Management Section and Real Property for
the next 23 years; and
WHEREAS, during his 41 years of service, Mr. Hilscher witnessed and helped to
support the evolution of the department’s use of a Geographical Information System.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chesterfield County Board of
Supervisors recognizes the contributions of Kenneth Hilscher, expresses the
appreciation of all residents for his service to the county, and extends their
appreciation for his dedicated service and their congratulations upon his
retirement.
Page 59 of 295
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Meeting Date: October 30, 2024 Item Number: 14.C.1.b.
Subject:
Resolution Recognizing Battalion Chief Mark R. Berry, Fire and Emergency Medical Services Department,
Upon His Retirement
Board Action Requested:
Adoption of the attached resolution
Summary of Information:
Battalion Chief Mark R. Berry retired from the Fire and Emergency Medical Services Department on
September 1, 2024, after providing 35 years of service to the citizens of Chesterfield County.
Attachments:
1. Consent Mark R. Berry (BC) 9.1.2024
Preparer: Loy Senter, Fire Chief
Approved By:
Page 60 of 295
RECOGNIZING BATTALION CHIEF MARK R. BERRY
UPON HIS RETIREMENT
WHEREAS, Battalion Chief Mark R. Berry retired from the
Chesterfield County Fire and Emergency Medical Services
Department, on September 1, 2024; and
WHEREAS, Chief Berry completed Recruit School #21 in 1989 and
has faithfully served Chesterfield County for 35 years in various
assignments as a Firefighter at the Dutch Gap Fire and EMS Station,
as a Lieutenant at the Bensley Fire & EMS Station; as a Lieutenant,
Captain, and Battalion Chief within the CFEMS’ Training and Safety
Division, as a Battalion Chief, North Division Commander and Shift
Commander for C-shift in Emergency Operations; and
WHEREAS, Chief Berry served as founding member of the CFEMS’
Technical Rescue Team (TRT)and served 10 years on the scuba rescue
(dive) team beginning in 1992; and
WHEREAS, Chief Berry served on the committee to develop and
implement CFEMS’ core leadership curriculums for supervisors, the
Applied Leadership for Company Officers (ALCO) and the Chief
Officers Development Program (CODP) beginning in 2002; and
WHEREAS, Chief Berry was awarded an EMS Unit Citation for his
involvement in the successful outcome of a pediatric patient at
the Chester YMCA on March 1, 1993; and
WHEREAS, Chief Berry was awarded a Unit Citation for his
involvement in the successful outcome of a family in distress on
the Appomattox River on April 16, 1994; and
WHEREAS, Chief Berry was awarded an EMS Unit Citation for his
involvement in the successful outcome of a drowning child on July
6, 1994
WHEREAS, Chief Berry was awarded the department’s first CFEMS
Medal of Valor for his involvement in the successful outcome of a
victim stranded within a Dominion Power smokestack at Dutch Gap
Power Station on October 25, 1994; and
WHEREAS, Chief Berry was awarded a Unit Citation for his
involvement in the successful rescue of trapped victims of a Park
Lee Apartment fire on April 12, 1997; and
WHEREAS, Chief Berry was awarded a Unit Citation for his
involvement in the successful outcome of teenagers stranded on an
Page 61 of 295
island on April 1, 2003; and
WHEREAS, Chief Berry oversaw the rescue of twenty-six
citizens from two deteriorating apartments overwhelmed by Falling
Creek flood waters during Tropical Storm Gaston on August 30, 2004;
and
WHEREAS, Chief Berry was instrumental in interviewing, hiring
and developing numerous employees that would later become Chief
Officers, Fire Officers and Firefighters through his oversight and
leadership of the applicant interview process beginning in 2006.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chesterfield County
Board of Supervisors recognizes the contributions of Battalion
Chief Mark R. Berry, expresses the appreciation of all citizens
for his service to the county and extends appreciation for his
dedicated service and congratulations upon his retirement.
Page 62 of 295
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Meeting Date: October 30, 2024 Item Number: 14.C.1.c.
Subject:
Resolution Recognizing Mrs. Jean Skinner, Department of General Services, Administration Division, Upon
Her Retirement
Board Action Requested:
Adoption of the attached resolution.
Summary of Information:
Mrs. Skinner retired from the Department of General Services, Administration Division on October 1, 2024,
after providing over 15 years of service to the citizens of Chesterfield County.
Attachments:
1. Retirement Resolution - Jean Skinner 2024-10-02
Preparer: John Neal, Director, General Services
Approved By:
Page 63 of 295
RECOGNIZING MRS. JEAN SKINNER UPON HER RETIREMENT
WHEREAS, Mrs. Jean Skinner retired from the Chesterfield
County Department of General Services Administration Division on
October 1, 2024; and
WHEREAS, Mrs. Skinner began her career in Chesterfield County
Government in the Planning Department on November 17, 2008; and
WHEREAS, Mrs. Skinner was promoted to the Department of
General Services on February, 2, 2013 as an Administrative
Assistant; and
WHEREAS, Mrs. Skinner’s commitment to a high standard of
personal and professional behavior contributed to the strategic
goals of the department; and
WHEREAS, Mrs. Skinner was a strong and steady performer for
the department and could always be relied upon to provide excellent
service; and
WHEREAS, Mrs. Skinner consistently maintained a positive and
hard-working attitude and promoted teamwork by example; and
WHEREAS, Mrs. Skinner was selected by her peers as the 2014
Employee of the Year for the Administration division; and
WHEREAS, Mrs. Skinner’s organization skills, flexibility,
institutional knowledge, and calm demeanor were strengths that
were displayed on a daily basis; and
WHEREAS, Mrs. Skinner completed the requirements for Level II
of the Career Development Path for the Administrative Assistant;
and
WHEREAS, Mrs. Skinner applied her skills, knowledge, and
experience to perform tasks effectively and improve customer
satisfaction; and
WHEREAS, Mrs. Skinner was a valued member of the General
Services Team and will be missed by her co-workers and customers.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chesterfield County
Board of Supervisors recognizes the outstanding contributions of
Jean Skinner, expresses the appreciation of all citizens for her
service to Chesterfield County, and extends appreciation for her
dedicated service to the County, congratulations upon her
retirement, and best wishes for a long and happy retirement.
Page 64 of 295
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Meeting Date: October 30, 2024 Item Number: 14.C.1.d.
Subject:
Resolution Recognizing the 175th Anniversary of Enon Baptist Church
Board Action Requested:
Mr. Ingle requests the Board of Supervisors adopt the attached resolution recognizing the 175th anniversary of
this historic church and its congregation.
Summary of Information:
Having been established in 1849, Enon Baptist Church located in Chester recently celebrated its 175th year of
ministry to the community.
Attachments:
1. Resolution
Preparer: Susan Wilson, Clerk to the Board of Supervisors
Approved By:
Page 65 of 295
RECOGNIZING THE 175TH ANNIVERSARY OF
ENON BAPTIST CHURCH
WHEREAS, Enon Baptist Church, located in Chester, was
organized on October 8, 1849; and
WHEREAS, the church was built on a one-acre tract given by
church founder, Rev. John Alexander Strachan; and
WHEREAS, in May 1864, during the Civil War, Union Army
troops under Maj. Gen. Benjamin F. Butler dismantled Enon Baptist
Church and moved the lumber to nearby Point of Rocks where they
used it to build a military hospital; and
WHEREAS, after the Civil War, members of the congregation
dismantled the hospital and used the materials to rebuild the
present Enon Baptist Church; and
WHEREAS, later, the congregation petitioned Congress and
was awarded compensation for the army’s destruction of the
building; and
WHEREAS, Enon Baptist Church became a member of the Southern
Baptist Convention of Virginia; and
WHEREAS, Enon Baptist Church has been a cornerstone of the
Chesterfield community, fostering fellowship, stewardship and
service; and
WHEREAS, the church's unwavering spiritual presence has
supported its members through 175 years of economic hardship,
societal shifts, global conflict, tragedy and sorrows.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chesterfield County
Board of Supervisors on behalf of the citizens of Chesterfield
County, recognizes and congratulates the congregation of Enon
Baptist Church on its 175th anniversary and wishes them continued
success and joy in all their endeavors.
Page 66 of 295
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Meeting Date: October 30, 2024 Item Number: 14.C.2.a.1.
Subject:
Acceptance of Parcels of Land Adjacent to Whitepine Road from 8800 Whitepine, LLC
Board Action Requested:
Accept the conveyance of two parcels of land containing a total of 0.336 acres adjacent to Whitepine Road
from 8800 Whitepine, LLC and authorize the County Administrator to execute the deed.
Summary of Information:
Staff requests that the Board of Supervisors accept the conveyance of two parcels of land containing a total of
0.336 acres adjacent to Whitepine Road from 8800 Whitepine, LLC. This conveyance is for the Whitepine
Logistics Center and has been reviewed by county staff.
Approval is recommended.
Attachments:
1. 8800 Whitepine LLC Dedication Sketch
2. 8800 Whitepine LLC Plat1
3. 8800 Whitepine LLC Plat2
Preparer: Lynn Snow, Real Property Manager
Approved By:
Page 67 of 295
RT 288
B E L M O N T R D
WH I T E P I N E R D
CORCORANDR
L
I
C
K
I
N
G
C
R
E
E
K
D
R
C O R C O R A N P L
C O R C O R A N C T
RT 288
Board of Supervisors M eeting - October 30, 2024Acceptance of Parcels of Land Adjacent to Whitepine Road from 8800 Whitepine, LLC
Chesterfield CountyReal Property Office
1 inch = 600 feet
µ
0.270 Acre Dedicatio n
0.066 Acre Dedicatio n
Page 68 of 295
Page 69 of 295
Page 70 of 295
Page 71 of 295
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Meeting Date: October 30, 2024 Item Number: 14.C.2.a.2.
Subject:
Acceptance of a Parcel of Land Adjacent to Otterdale Road from Windswept Development LLC
Board Action Requested:
Accept the conveyance of a parcel of land containing 0.206 acres adjacent to Otterdale Road from Windswept
Development LLC and authorize the County Administrator to execute the deed.
Summary of Information:
Staff requests that the Board of Supervisors accept the conveyance of a parcel of land containing 0.206 acres
adjacent to Otterdale Road from Windswept Development LLC. This conveyance is for the Westerleigh and
Otterdale Roads Roundabout Project and has been reviewed by county staff.
Approval is recommended.
Attachments:
1. Windswept Development LLC Dedication Sketch
2. Windswept Development LLC Dedication Plat
Preparer: Lynn Snow, Real Property Manager
Approved By:
Page 72 of 295
O T T E R D A L E R D
C A B R E T T A D R
BROADMOOR RD
WESTERLEIGH PKWY
CABRIO PL
CAMFIELD DR
O
TTER
D
ALE P
OINTE D
R
CABRIO CT
E L I N W O O D D R
K Y L O E L N
CABRETTA CT
CRESTWYCKE CT
C H E S L E R D R
LAUREL PARK DR
ELINWOOD CT
Board of Supervisors M eeting - October 30, 2024Acceptance of a Parcel of Land Adjacent to Otterdale Road from Windswept Development LLC
Chesterfield CountyReal Property Office
1 inch = 300 feet
µ
0.206 Acre Dedicatio n
Page 73 of 295
RYAN J. LEROW
D.B.10653, PG.857
710-681-3021
5001 Otterdale Road
3.975 AC.
P
e
r
m
.
V
a
r
i
a
b
l
e
W
i
d
t
h
E
s
m
t
.
(
D
.
B
.
1
9
7
3
,
P
G
.
1
9
0
7
)
1
6
'
S
a
n
i
t
a
r
y
S
e
w
e
r
E
a
s
e
m
e
n
t
(
D
.
B
.
7
4
4
3
,
P
G
.
2
3
)
Va
r
.
W
i
d
t
h
S
a
n
i
t
a
r
y
S
e
w
e
r
Ea
s
e
m
e
n
t
(
D
.
B
.
7
4
4
3
,
P
G
.
2
1
)
Pe
r
m
.
V
a
r
i
a
b
l
e
W
i
d
t
h
E
s
m
t
.
(D
.
B
.
1
9
8
0
,
P
G
.
5
5
7
)
Va
r
.
W
i
d
t
h
V
D
O
T
D
r
a
i
n
a
g
e
Es
m
t
.
(
D
.
B
.
7
8
7
5
,
P
G
.
9
0
1
)
15
'
P
r
e
s
c
r
i
p
t
i
v
e
E
a
s
e
m
e
n
t
15
'
P
r
e
s
c
r
i
p
t
i
v
e
E
a
s
e
m
e
n
t
WESTERLEIGH PARKWAY
(ROUTE 6495)
(90' R/W)
(D.B.7883,PG.563)
50
'
B
u
f
f
e
r
(P
B
.
1
7
9
,
P
G
.
9
5
)
WESTERLEIGH
COMMUNITY
ASSOCIATION, INC.
D.B.9282, PG.301
709-681-4334
16700 Westerleigh Parkway
1.523 AC.
1
6
'
S
e
w
e
r
E
a
s
e
m
e
n
t
(
P
.
B
.
2
2
4
,
P
G
.
1
)
16
'
S
e
w
e
r
E
a
s
e
m
e
n
t
(P
.
B
.
2
2
4
,
P
G
.
1
)
MARK A. CLINE
JERYLEE M. CLINE
D.B.10736, PG.257
709-681-5245
4813 Elinwood Drive
0.513 AC.
ANDREW R. WARTELL
ELIZABETH D. WEDDLE
D.B.10873, PG.543
709-681-6152
4807 Elinwood Drive
0.469 AC.
20' Verizon E
a
s
e
m
e
n
t
(D.B.10680,P
G
.
2
1
7
)
20' Dominion
E
a
s
e
m
e
n
t
(D.B.10682,P
G
.
3
4
4
)
ELINWOOD D
R
I
V
E
(
4
0
'
R/W)
(P.B.224,PG
.
1
)
V
a
r
.
W
i
d
t
h
V
D
O
T
D
r
a
i
n
a
g
e
E
s
m
t
.
(D
.
B
.
7
0
8
5
,
P
G
.
9
7
2
)
W
I
N
D
S
W
E
P
T
DE
V
E
L
O
P
M
E
N
T
,
L
L
C
D.
B
.
1
0
3
0
3
,
P
G
.
4
6
70
9
-
6
8
1
-
7
3
6
9
16
6
0
1
B
r
o
a
d
m
o
o
r
R
o
a
d
2.
3
8
4
A
C
.
WINDSWEPT
DEVELOPMENT, LLC
D.B. 10303, PG. 46
(NO TAX MAP #)
O
T
T
E
R
D
A
L
E
R
O
A
D
(
R
O
U
T
E
6
6
7
)
(V
a
r
.
W
i
d
t
h
&
P
r
e
s
c
r
i
p
t
i
v
e
E
a
s
e
m
e
n
t
)
(P
.
B
.
2
7
5
,
P
G
S
.
3
0
-
3
3
)
(
D
.
B
.
7
1
4
1
,
P
G
.
2
5
0
)
(
P
.
B
.
1
6
2
,
P
G
.
1
4
)
(P
.
B
.
1
7
9
,
P
G
.
8
7
)
(
D
.
B
.
7
8
8
3
,
P
G
.
5
6
3
)
(
D
.
B
.
1
0
1
0
5
,
P
G
.
8
0
9
)
LINE TABLE
LINE
L1
L2
L3
L4
L8
L9
L10
L11
L12
BEARING
N35°15'58"E
N36°02'49"E
N36°37'51"E
N37°14'08"E
S37°14'08"W
S36°37'51"W
S36°02'30"W
S35°16'14"W
N49°24'27"W
LENGTH
182.48'
160.52'
156.00'
50.29'
50.16'
157.26'
158.92'
183.77'
15.05'
DEDICATION
8,971.36 SQFT.
0.206 AC.
N: 3681249.52
E: 11709639.78
N: 3681239.73
E: 11709651.21
Centerline of Otterdale Road
(Route 667)
15
'
P
r
e
s
c
r
i
p
t
i
v
e
E
a
s
e
m
e
n
t
15
'
P
r
e
s
c
r
i
p
t
i
v
e
E
a
s
e
m
e
n
t
15
'
P
r
e
s
c
r
i
p
t
i
v
e
E
a
s
e
m
e
n
t
Var. Width SWM/BMP
Easement
(D.B.10379,PG.270)
L1
L2
L9
L1
0
L1
1
L
1
2
SHEET 2
SHEET 1
49
1
1
O
t
t
e
r
d
a
l
e
R
o
a
d
2.
1
8
A
C
.
0
SCALE 1"=40'
80'40'
YO
U
R
V
I
S
I
O
N
A
C
H
I
E
V
E
D
T
H
R
O
U
G
H
O
U
R
S
.
PLAT SHOWING
DEDICATION
ACROSS THE LANDS OF
WINDSWEPT DEVELOPMENT LLC
MATOACA DISTRICT
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY, VIRGINIA
10
0
1
B
o
u
l
d
e
r
s
P
a
r
k
w
a
y
,
S
u
i
t
e
3
0
0
|
R
i
c
h
m
o
n
d
,
V
A
2
3
2
2
5
TE
L
8
0
4
.
2
0
0
.
6
5
0
0
F
A
X
8
0
4
.
5
6
0
.
1
0
1
6
w
w
w
.
t
i
m
m
o
n
s
.
c
o
m
TH
I
S
D
R
A
W
I
N
G
P
R
E
P
A
R
E
D
A
T
T
H
E
CO
R
P
O
R
A
T
E
O
F
F
I
C
E
DATE:SCALE:
J.N.:SHEET OF
DRAWN BY:CHECK BY:
APR. 23, 2024
1 2
WRH
34050.020
1" = 40'
GFD
N
A
D
8
3
CO PROJ #23-0119
CO SITE #23PR0049
THIS PLAT WAS PREPARED WITHOUT
THE BENEFIT OF A TITLE REPORT.Page 74 of 295
FREDERICK MELVIN BOYD,
TRUSTEE
BOYD FAMILY TRUST
DATED OCTOBER 11, 2015
D.B.12151, PG.360
710-681-4854
4901 Otterdale Road
5 AC.
STUART I. RUTHERFORD
ILENE P. RUTHERFORD
D.B.707, PG.519
710-681-2258
4909 Otterdale Road
1.795 AC.
P
e
r
m
.
V
a
r
i
a
b
l
e
W
i
d
t
h
E
s
m
t
.
(D
.
B
.
1
9
7
2
,
P
G
.
3
2
7
)
P
e
r
m
.
V
a
r
i
a
b
l
e
W
i
d
t
h
E
s
m
t
.
(D
.
B
.
1
9
7
3
,
P
G
.
1
9
1
5
)
RYAN J. LEROW
D.B.10653, PG.857
710-681-3021
5001 Otterdale Road
3.975 AC.
P
e
r
m
.
V
a
r
i
a
b
l
e
W
i
d
t
h
E
s
m
t
.
(
D
.
B
.
1
9
7
3
,
P
G
.
1
9
0
7
)
1
6
'
S
a
n
i
t
a
r
y
S
e
w
e
r
E
a
s
e
m
e
n
t
(
D
.
B
.
7
4
4
3
,
P
G
.
2
3
)
Va
r
.
W
i
d
t
h
V
D
O
T
D
r
a
i
n
a
g
e
Es
m
t
.
(
D
.
B
.
7
8
7
5
,
P
G
.
9
0
1
)
15
'
P
r
e
s
c
r
i
p
t
i
v
e
E
a
s
e
m
e
n
t
15
'
P
r
e
s
c
r
i
p
t
i
v
e
E
a
s
e
m
e
n
t
15
'
P
r
e
s
c
r
i
p
t
i
v
e
E
a
s
e
m
e
n
t
2
0
'
D
o
m
i
n
i
o
n
E
a
s
e
m
e
n
t
(
D
.
B
.
1
0
6
8
2
,
P
G
.
3
4
4
)
B
R
O
A
D
M
O
O
R
R
O
A
D
(
R
O
U
T
E
7
7
1
)
(
5
0
'
R
/
W
)
(
P
.
B
.
1
5
,
P
G
.
9
6
)
15
'
P
r
e
s
c
r
i
p
t
i
v
e
E
a
s
e
m
e
n
t
ANDREW R. WARTELL
ELIZABETH D. WEDDLE
D.B.10873, PG.543
709-681-6152
4807 Elinwood Drive
0.469 AC.
V
a
r
.
W
i
d
t
h
V
D
O
T
D
r
a
i
n
a
g
e
E
s
m
t
.
(D
.
B
.
7
0
8
5
,
P
G
.
9
7
2
)
Var. Width SWM/BMP
Easement
(D.B.10379,PG.270)
W
I
N
D
S
W
E
P
T
DE
V
E
L
O
P
M
E
N
T
,
L
L
C
D
.
B
.
1
0
3
0
3
,
P
G
.
4
6
70
9
-
6
8
1
-
7
3
6
9
16
6
0
1
B
r
o
a
d
m
o
o
r
R
o
a
d
2.
3
8
4
A
C
.
WINDSWEPT
DEVELOPMENT, LLC
D.B.10303, PG.46
709-681-7369
16601 Broadmoor Road
2.384 AC.
O
T
T
E
R
D
A
L
E
R
O
A
D
(
R
O
U
T
E
6
6
7
)
(V
a
r
.
W
i
d
t
h
&
P
r
e
s
c
r
i
p
t
i
v
e
E
a
s
e
m
e
n
t
)
(P
.
B
.
2
7
5
,
P
G
S
.
3
0
-
3
3
)
(
D
.
B
.
7
1
4
1
,
P
G
.
2
5
0
)
(
P
.
B
.
1
6
2
,
P
G
.
1
4
)
(P
.
B
.
1
7
9
,
P
G
.
8
7
)
(
D
.
B
.
7
8
8
3
,
P
G
.
5
6
3
)
(
D
.
B
.
1
0
1
0
5
,
P
G
.
8
0
9
)
LINE TABLE
LINE
L1
L2
BEARING
N35°15'58"E
N36°02'49"E
LENGTH
182.48'
160.52'
15
'
P
r
e
s
c
r
i
p
t
i
v
e
E
a
s
e
m
e
n
t
Var. Width SWM/BMP
Easement
(D.B.10379,PG.270)
N: 3681731.93
E: 11709992.71
L2
L3
L4
L5
L
6
L7
L8
L9
L1
0
N: 3681722.91
E: 11710004.70
SHEET 2
SHEET 1
DEDICATION
8,971.36 SQFT.
0.206 AC.
T
O
D
D
R
U
N
E
Y
C
H
E
L
S
E
A
R
U
N
E
Y
D
.
B
.
1
4
6
2
6
,
P
G
.
9
3
3
7
1
0
-
6
8
1
-
4
9
2
4
4
9
1
1
O
t
t
e
r
d
a
l
e
R
o
a
d
2.
1
8
A
C
.
YO
U
R
V
I
S
I
O
N
A
C
H
I
E
V
E
D
T
H
R
O
U
G
H
O
U
R
S
.
PLAT SHOWING
DEDICATION
ACROSS THE LANDS OF
WINDSWEPT DEVELOPMENT LLC
MATOACA DISTRICT
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY, VIRGINIA
10
0
1
B
o
u
l
d
e
r
s
P
a
r
k
w
a
y
,
S
u
i
t
e
3
0
0
|
R
i
c
h
m
o
n
d
,
V
A
2
3
2
2
5
TE
L
8
0
4
.
2
0
0
.
6
5
0
0
F
A
X
8
0
4
.
5
6
0
.
1
0
1
6
w
w
w
.
t
i
m
m
o
n
s
.
c
o
m
TH
I
S
D
R
A
W
I
N
G
P
R
E
P
A
R
E
D
A
T
T
H
E
CO
R
P
O
R
A
T
E
O
F
F
I
C
E
DATE:SCALE:
J.N.:SHEET OF
DRAWN BY:CHECK BY:
APR. 23, 2024
2 2
WRH
34050.020
1" = 40'
GFD
0
SCALE 1"=40'
80'40'
N
A
D
8
3
CO PROJ #23-0119
CO SITE #23PR0049
THIS PLAT WAS PREPARED WITHOUT
THE BENEFIT OF A TITLE REPORT.
LINE TABLES ON SHEET 1
Page 75 of 295
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Meeting Date: October 30, 2024 Item Number: 14.C.2.a.3.
Subject:
Acceptance of a Parcel of Land Adjacent to East West Road from Watkins Center MOB, LLC
Board Action Requested:
Accept the conveyance of a parcel of land containing 0.021 acres adjacent to East West Road from Watkins
Center MOB, LLC and authorize the County Administrator to execute the deed.
Summary of Information:
Staff requests that the Board of Supervisors accept the conveyance of a parcel of land containing 0.021 acres
adjacent to East West Road from Watkins Center MOB, LLC. This conveyance is for the Watkins Centre
Medical Office Building and has been reviewed by county staff.
Approval is recommended.
Attachments:
1. WATKINS CENTER MOB Dedication Sketch
2. WATKINS CENTER MOB Dedication Plat
Preparer: Lynn Snow, Real Property Manager
Approved By:
Page 76 of 295
RT 288 RP
MIDLOTHIAN TPKE
E
A
S
T
W
E
S
T R
D
P E R I M E T E R D R
W A T K I N S C E N T R E P K W Y
B
R
A
E
T
O
N D
R
B I R C H M E A D O W R D
W A T K I N S V I E W D R
FL
O
W
E
RIN
G D
O
G
W
O
O
D L
N
MIDLOTHIAN TPKE RT 288 RP
W A T K I N S C E N T R E P K W Y
Board of Supervisors M eeting - October 30, 2024Acceptance of a Parcel of Land Adjacent to East West Road from Watkins Center MOB, LLC
Chesterfield CountyReal Property Office
1 inch = 300 feet
µ
0.021 Acre Dedicatio n
Page 77 of 295
Pa
g
e
7
8
o
f
2
9
5
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Meeting Date: October 30, 2024 Item Number: 14.C.2.b.1.
Subject:
Conveyance of a 15' Easement to Virginia Electric and Power Company for Beulah Recreation Center
Board Action Requested:
Authorize the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors and the County Administrator to execute an agreement
with Virginia Electric and Power Company for a 15’ underground easement for Beulah Recreation Center.
Summary of Information:
A 15’ underground easement, as shown on the attached plat, is necessary to serve Beulah Recreation
Center. This request has been reviewed by county staff.
Approval is recommended.
Attachments:
1. Beulah Recreation Center Dominion Energy Easement Sketch
2. Beulah Recreation Center Easement Plat 1
3. Beulah Recreation Center Easement Plat 2
Preparer: Lynn Snow, Real Property Manager
Approved By:
Page 79 of 295
H
O
P
K
I
N
S
R
D
B E U L A H R D
B
R
O
O
K
S
H
I
R
E
D
R
P
H
I
L
B
R
O
O
K
R
D
HARVETTE DR
P R E T T Y L N
M
E
A
D
O
W
B
U
R
M
D
R
C E D A R D A L E L N
F
U
Q
U
A
A
V
E
R
O
D
O
P
H
I
L
R
D
B R Y A N W O O D R D
S T A T E L Y O A K R D
H A R V E T T E C I R
Board of Supervisors M eeting - October 30, 2024Conveyance of a 15' Easement to Virginia Electricand Power Company for Beulah Recreation C enter
Chesterfield CountyReal Property Office
1 inch = 300 feet
µ
Proposed Virginia Electricand Power Co. Easement
Page 80 of 295
L
E
G
E
N
D
D
o
m
i
n
i
o
n
E
n
e
r
g
y
V
i
r
g
i
n
i
a
Page 81 of 295
L
E
G
E
N
D
D
o
m
i
n
i
o
n
E
n
e
r
g
y
V
i
r
g
i
n
i
a
Page 82 of 295
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Meeting Date: October 30, 2024 Item Number: 14.C.2.c.1.
Subject:
Request Permission to Allow an Existing Private Water Service Within a Proposed Private Water Easement to
Serve the Property at 5020 Route 1
Board Action Requested:
Grant permission to allow an existing private water service, within a proposed private water easement, to serve
property at 5020 Route 1 and authorize the County Administrator to execute the water connection agreement.
Summary of Information:
Finer Homes, Inc. has requested permission to allow an existing private water service, within a proposed
private water easement, to serve property at 5020 Route 1. This request is for an existing business whose parcel
was split by recordation of Falling Creek Section 2 Subdivision and has been reviewed by the Utilities
Department.
Approval is recommended.
Attachments:
1. Oriole Avenue Water Exception Sketch
2. Oriole Ave Water Exception Plat
Preparer: Lynn Snow, Real Property Manager
Approved By:
Page 83 of 295
05C
001
010
006
09B
00808A
001
007
02C
02D07D
001
002
013
05A
02B
007
016 014015
011004
008
012002
016
009
010
011
001
008
005
012
002
006
003
007
013
013
014
015
006
007
09C
013
003
011
010
012
010 011 012
017
005
017
014
009
11A
R
O
U
T
E
1
O
R
I
O
L
E
A
V
E
F A L L I N G C R E E K A V E
P A T E A V E
R
O
U
T
E
1
Board of Supervisors M eeting -October 30, 2024Request Perm ission to Allow an Existing Private Water Service Within a Proposed Private Water Easement to Serve the Property at 5020 Route 1
Chesterfield CountyReal Property Office
1 inch = 200 feet
µ
Property Requesting Water Exception
Page 84 of 295
Page 85 of 295
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Meeting Date: October 30, 2024 Item Number: 14.C.2.d.1.
Subject:
Request to Quitclaim a Portion of a Temporary Reduced Imperviousness Best Management Practices (BMP)
Easement and a Sewer Easement Across the Property Owned by Woolridge Vet Partners, LLC
Board Action Requested:
Authorize the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors and the County Administrator to execute a quitclaim deed
to quitclaim a portion of a temporary reduced imperviousness best management practices (BMP) easement and
a sewer easement across the property owned by Woolridge Vet Partners, LLC.
Summary of Information:
Woolridge Vet Partners, LLC has requested the quitclaim a portion of a temporary reduced imperviousness best
management practices (BMP) easement and a sewer easement as shown on the attached plats. These easements
are no longer needed. This conveyance is for the development of Otterdale Pet Wellness Center and has been
reviewed by the site plan team.
Approval is recommended.
Attachments:
1. Woolridge Vet Partners LLC Quitclaim Sketch
2. Woolridge Vet Partners LLC SEWER ESMT QUITCLAIM Plat
3. Woolridge Vet Partners LLC REDUCED IMPERVIOUSNESS ESMT QUITCLAIM Plat
Preparer: Lynn Snow, Real Property Manager
Approved By:
Page 86 of 295
W O O L R I D G E R D
G O S S A M E R D R
S
T
RID
E
R R
D
RAVENCHASE WAY
T H O R N A P P L E R U N
C A S S I A L O O P
R
O
H
A
N
P
L
R
O
H
A
N
C
T
T R A I L R I D E D R
G
O
S
S
A
M
E
R
P
L
M
E
L
R
O
S
E
H
O
L
D
A
L
Y
O
R
C
H
A
R
D T
A
V
E
R
N P
L
B
R
A
I
L
E
N
D
R
LILTING M
OON DR
B U G L E R S T R A I L L N
BIL
B
E
R
R
Y A
L
Y
S T R I D E R P L
S T R I D E R A L Y
T H O R N A P P L E A L Y
R
O
H
A
N
W
A
Y
G
O
S
S
A
M
E
R A
L
Y
K
N
O
T
G
R
A
S
S ALY
S W I F T P A D D L E T U R N
A V E N S W A T E R A L Y
W O O L R I D G E R D
Board of Supervisors M eeting - October 30, 2024Request to Quitclaim a Portion of a Temporary Reduced Imperviousness Best Management Practices (BMP) Easement and a Sewer Easement Across the Property Owned by Woolridge Vet Partners, LLC
Chesterfield CountyReal Property Office
1 inch = 300 feet
µ
Portion of a Temporary Reduced Imperviousness Best Management Practices (BM P) Easement to be Quitclaimed
Sewer Easement to b e Quitclaimed
Page 87 of 295
DATE:
SCALE: 1" =
JOB:
DRAWN BY:FJE
55230003.00
30'
08-19-2024
CHECKED BY:CMF
SHEET OF1 0115871 City View Drive, Suite 200 / Midlothian, Virginia 23113 / Phone (804) 794-0571 / www.balzer.cc
08-19-2024
j:
\
2
3
\
5
0
\
5
5
\
5
5
2
3
0
0
0
3
.
0
0
b
u
r
k
e
y
v
e
t
-
p
a
r
t
i
a
l
t
o
p
o
s
u
r
v
e
y
\
s
u
r
v
e
y
\
d
r
a
w
i
n
g
s
\
5
5
2
3
0
0
0
3
s
e
w
e
r
e
s
m
t
v
a
c
a
t
i
o
n
.
d
w
g
PLANNERS / ARCHITECTS / ENGINEERS / SURVEYORS
ROANOKE / RICHMOND / NEW RIVER VALLEY / SHENANDOAH VALLEY
Page 88 of 295
DATE:
SCALE: 1" =
JOB:
DRAWN BY:FJE
55230003.00
30'
08-19-2024
CHECKED BY:CMF
SHEET OF1 0115871 City View Drive, Suite 200 / Midlothian, Virginia 23113 / Phone (804) 794-0571 / www.balzer.cc
08-19-2024
j:
\
2
3
\
5
0
\
5
5
\
5
5
2
3
0
0
0
3
.
0
0
b
u
r
k
e
y
v
e
t
-
p
a
r
t
i
a
l
t
o
p
o
s
u
r
v
e
y
\
s
u
r
v
e
y
\
d
r
a
w
i
n
g
s
\
5
5
2
3
0
0
0
3
r
e
d
u
c
e
d
i
m
p
e
r
v
i
o
u
s
e
s
m
t
v
a
c
a
t
i
o
n
.
d
w
g
PLANNERS / ARCHITECTS / ENGINEERS / SURVEYORS
ROANOKE / RICHMOND / NEW RIVER VALLEY / SHENANDOAH VALLEY
Page 89 of 295
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Meeting Date: October 30, 2024 Item Number: 14.C.2.d.2.
Subject:
Request to Quitclaim Portions of a 16’ Water Easement and a Variable Width Sewer and Water Easement
Across the Properties Owned by Economic Development Authority of the County of Chesterfield
Board Action Requested:
Authorize the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors and the County Administrator to execute a quitclaim deed
to quitclaim portions of a 16’ water easement and portions of a variable width sewer and water easement across
the properties owned by Economic Development Authority of the County of Chesterfield.
Summary of Information:
Economic Development Authority of the County of Chesterfield has requested the quitclaim of portions of a
16’ water easement and portions of a variable width sewer and water easement, which are no longer needed,
and are shown on the attached plat. This quitclaim is needed for the development of Springrock Green and has
been reviewed by the site plan team.
Approval is recommended.
Attachments:
1. Economic Development Authority Quitclaim Sketch
2. Economic Development Authority Quitclaim Plat
Preparer: Lynn Snow, Real Property Manager
Approved By:
Page 90 of 295
M I D L O T H I A N T P K E
C H I P P E N H A M R P
C
H
I
P
P
E
N
H
A
M
P
K
W
Y
T I M P R I C E W A Y
B O U L D E R S P R I N G S D R
D
O
N
A
L
D
M
A
Y
J
R
D
R
S
T
O
N
E
B
R
I
D
G
E
P
L
A
Z
A
A
V
E
K
A
R
L
L
I
N
N
D
R
G
R
A
N
I
T
E
S
P
R
I
N
G
R
D
D
O
N
A
L
D
M
A
Y
J
R
X
O
C H I P P E N H A M R P
CHIPPENHAM RP
M I D L O T H I A N T P K E
C
H
I
P
P
E
N
H
A
M
P
K
W
Y
Board of Supervisors M eeting - October 30, 2024Request to Quitclaim Portions of a 16’ Water Easement and a Variable Width Sewer and Water Easement Across the Properties Owned by Economic Development Authority of the County of Chesterfield
Chesterfield CountyReal Property Office
1 inch = 300 feet
µ
Portion of 16' Water Easement to b e Quitclaimed
Portions of Variable Width Sewer and Water Easement to b e QuitclaimedPortion of 16' Water Easement to b e Quitclaimed
Page 91 of 295
Page 92 of 295
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Meeting Date: October 30, 2024 Item Number: 14.C.2.e.
Subject:
Approve a Lease Amendment for the Dry Bridge 911 Tower Site
Board Action Requested:
The Board is requested to approve a lease amendment with Dry Bridge Partnership for the Dry Bridge 911
Tower Site.
Summary of Information:
Since 1999, the County has leased the site for the Dry Bridge 911 Tower from Dry Bridge Partnership. Staff
has negotiated a lease extension to run through October 31, 2054. Rent will be $17,000 per year with 15%
increases every five years.
Approval is recommended.
Attachments:
1. Dry Bridge Vicinity Sketch
Preparer: Lynn Snow, Real Property Manager
Craig Willingham, Assistant Director, General Services
Approved By:
Page 93 of 295
D
R
Y
B
R
I
D
G
E
R
D
M I D L O T H I A N T P K E
H U G U E N O T S P R I N G S R D
M I D L O T H I A N T P K E
Board of Supervisors M eeting - October 30, 2024Lease Amendment for the Dry Bridge 911 Tower Site
Chesterfield CountyReal Property Office
1 inch = 400 feetharmonjohn 10-14-2024µ
Existing Dry Bridge 911 Tow er
Page 94 of 295
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Meeting Date: October 30, 2024 Item Number: 14.C.3.a.
Subject:
To Consider the Quitclaim of a Portion of Creekstone Point Avenue
Board Action Requested:
The Board is requested to set December 18, 2024, as the date to hold a public hearing to consider the quitclaim
of a portion of Creekstone Point Avenue.
Summary of Information:
Swift Creek Villas, LLC has requested the quitclaim of a portion Creekstone Point Avenue. The Board is
requested to set December 18, 2024, as the date to hold a public hearing to consider the quitclaim of a portion
Creekstone Point Avenue. This request has been reviewed by staff and the portion of road is no longer
needed.
Approval is recommended.
Attachments:
1. Creekstone Point Avenue Quitclaim Sketch
2. Crekstone Point Avenue Quitclaim Plat
Preparer: Lynn Snow, Real Property Manager
Approved By:
Page 95 of 295
O
T
T
E
R
D
A
L
E
R
D
B U G L E R S T R A I L L N
W O O L R I D G E R D
W I N T E R S P R E Y T R L
M A Y L A N D R I D G E L N
B L U E I R I S L N
C A L L A L I L Y D R
CREEKSTONE POINT AVE
F O X C R E E K X I N G
ROSEBRIER TER
MIDNIGHT XING
HEARTQUAKE TRCE
ARNICA TER
FIREFLY CIR
RUSTIC COVE CIR
HEATHWOOD CT
Board of Supervisors M eeting - October 30, 2024Set a Public Hearing to Consider the Quitclaim of a Portion of Creekstone Point Avenue
Chesterfield CountyReal Property Office
1 inch = 300 feet
µ
Portion of Creekstone Point Avenue to be Qu itclaimed
Page 96 of 295
Page 97 of 295
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Meeting Date: October 30, 2024 Item Number: 14.C.3.b.
Subject:
To Consider the Exercise of Eminent Domain for the Woolridge Road (Route 288 to Old Hundred Road)
Extension Project Right-of-Way and Easement Acquisition
Board Action Requested:
The Board is requested to set December 18, 2024 as the date to hold a public hearing to consider the exercise of
eminent domain for the acquisition of right-of-way and easements for the Woolridge Road (Route 288 to Old
Hundred Road) Extension Project.
Summary of Information:
In 2017, the Board adopted a resolution endorsing the revenue sharing application to fund the extension of
Woolridge Road from Route 288 to Old Hundred Road and preliminary engineering began the following
year. The project involves the construction of approximately 1.25 miles of four-lane divided roadway with
sidewalk and shared-use-path and twin 650 foot long bridges, traffic signals at the Route 288 interchange ramps
and a hybrid roundabout at the Old Hundred Road intersection. This will complete Woolridge Road as shown
on the county's throughfare plan.
The county's right-of-way acquisition consultant has been unable to acquire right-of-way and easements from
three of the eleven parcels required for the construction of Woolridge Road (Route 288 to Old Hundred Road)
Extension Project, and recommends the county exercise eminent domain so that utility relocation can begin and
construction can remain on schedule.
If the county proceeds with eminent domain, a certificate of take will be filed with the courts, which will allow
the county to immediately enter and use the right-of-way and easements, so the project can proceed without
delay. The county will then be obligated to purchase the right-of-way and easements from the property owners
as identified in Attachment A.
Sufficient funds are available in the budget to pay the anticipated condemnation costs.
Attachments:
1. Woolridge Road Extension - Project Map
2. Woolridge Road Extension - Attachment A
Preparer: Chessa Walker, Director of Transportation
Page 98 of 295
Approved By:
Page 99 of 295
Woolridge Rd (Route 288 - Old Hundred Rd) Extension Project
Ro
u
t
e
2
8
8
R
o
u
t
e
2
8
8
PROJECT
PARCEL
002
PARCEL
010
Old Hundred Rd
Wo
o
l
r
i
d
g
e
R
d
O
t
t
e
r
d
a
l
e
R
d
Ol
d
H
u
n
d
r
e
d
R
d
Ot
t
e
r
d
a
l
e
R
d
PARCEL
001
¯
0 0.2 0.40.1 Miles
V:\01 Transportation Projects\TD\Woolridge Rd Extension JL11831C2 (288-Old Hundred)\Agendas\Woolridge Ext Schedule ED Project MapPage 100 of 295
ATTACHMENT A
WOOLRIDGE ROAD (ROUTE 288 – OLD HUNDRED ROAD) EXTENSION PROJECT
PARCELS RECOMMENDED FOR EMINENT DOMAIN PROCEEDINGS
Parcel
Number Name Parcel ID (GPIN) Property Address Rights to Be Acquired
Original Offer
Date
Current Offer
Amount
001 Douglas R. & Susan S. Sowers 717696883400000 200 Old Hundred
Road FEE, PSDE, Gas Util, TCE 08/28/2024 $169,242
002 Roseland Crossroads, LLC 719697801200000 2041 Old Hundred
Road
FEE, PSDE, DOM, VDOT
Util, TCE 09/24/2024 $0
[due to Proffer]
010 Douglas R. & Susan S. Sowers 719694588500000 2411 Otterdale Road VDOT Util 02/06/2024 $400
Legend
FEE = Fee Simple Right of Way DOM = Permanent Utility Easement, Dominion Energy
PSDE = Permanent Slope Drainage Easement VER = Permanent Utility Easement, Verizon
Util = Permanent Utility Easement, VDOT, Gas, or Sewer TCE = Temporary Construction Easement
TOTAL PER
RECORDED
DEED
FEE R/W
TAKING
TOTAL
PRESCRIPTIVE
R/W
FEE
REMAINDER
PERMANENT
SLOPE &
DRAINAGE
EASEMENT
PERMANENT
COLUMBIA
GAS UTILITY
EASEMENT
PERMANENT
SEWER
UTILITY
EASEMENT
PERMANENT
VDOT
UTILITY
EASEMENT
PERMANENT
VERIZON
EASEMENT
PERMANENT
DOMINION
EASEMENT
TEMPORARY
CONSTRUCTION
EASEMENT
ACRES ACRES ACRES ACRES ACRES ACRES ACRES ACRES ACRES ACRES ACRES
001 Douglas R. & Susan S. 3, 4, 5, 5B 4.711 1.296 0.000 3.415 0.103 0.297 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.162
002 Roseland Crossroads, LLC 5, 5C, 6, 7 16.630 4.180 0.000 12.45 1.669 0.000 0.000 0.105 0.000 0.105 0.520
010 Douglas R. & Susan S. 3, 4, 5B 159.863 0.000 0.000 159.863 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.122 0.000 0.000 0.000
011 Stanley Martin Homes, Inc.4, 5, 5C 22.082 0.121 0.000 21.961 0.169 0.000 0.016 0.117 0.000 0.000 0.193
Landowner
Parcel
Number
Sheet
Number
RIGHT-OF-WAY AND EASEMENT DATA
Page 101 of 295
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Meeting Date: October 30, 2024 Item Number: 14.C.3.c.
Subject:
To Consider Approval of Lease Extension for 6737 Public Safety Way to the Virginia Credit Union
Board Action Requested:
Set a public hearing for December 18, 2024 to consider a lease amendment extending the existing lease of
office space to the Virginia Credit Union.
Summary of Information:
The Virginia Credit Union (VACU) currently leases 5,139 square feet of office space at 6737 Public Safety
Way (owned by Chesterfield County), to operate a local branch. This lease expires on December 31, 2024. This
month-to-month extension allows VACU to continue operating at this location until their new branch location
in Courthouse Landing opens.
General Services has evaluated this request pursuant to policy requirements and concurs that an extension is
necessary. The extension will maintain the current monthly rate of $6,083.48 throughout the month-to-month
extension.
A public hearing is required to consider the lease of County-owned property.
Attachments:
1. 6737 PUBLIC WORKS WAY (VACU-FIRST AMENDMENT TO LEASE AGREEMENT - EFF 01-01-
25)
Preparer: Craig Willingham, Assistant Director, General Services
Approved By:
Page 102 of 295
1
FIRST AMENDMENT TO LEASE AGREEMENT
This First Amendment to Lease Agreement (this “Amendment”) dated ______________,
2024, is entered into by and between the County of Chesterfield, Virginia (“Lessor”) and Virginia
Credit Union, Inc. (“Lessee”) to modify and amend that certain Lease Agreement dated December
7, 2020 (the “Lease Agreement”) by and between Lessor and Lessee.
WHEREAS, Lessor and Lessee entered into the Lease Agreement pursuant to which
Lessee leases the Premises (as defined in the Lease Agreement) from Lessor; and
WHEREAS, the term of the Agreement expires on December 31, 2024; and
WHEREAS, Lessor and Lessee wish to extend the term of the Agreement for up to twenty-
four (24) additional one (1) month terms.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements herein and
as stated in the Lease Agreement and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and
sufficiency of which is acknowledged, Lessor and Lessee agree as follows:
1. Extension of Term. At the expiration of the Lease Agreement on December 31,
2024, the term of the Lease Agreement will automatically be extended for twenty-four (24)
additional consecutive one (1) month terms (each such monthly term referred to as a “Monthly
Renewal Term”), unless Lessee provides written notice to Lessor of its election not to renew the
term of the Lease Agreement at least twenty (20) days prior to the beginning of the next Monthly
Renewal Term.
2. Rent. The rent payable for each Monthly Renewal Term shall be $6,083.48 per
month, and such rent shall be payable on the first day of each Monthly Renewal Term.
3. Governing Law; Forum and Venue. The Lease Agreement and this Amendment
shall be governed by the laws of the Commonwealth of Virginia, excepting its laws governing the
conflict of laws. Any disputes arising out of or relating to the Lease Agreement or this Amendment
shall be brought in the Circuit Court of Chesterfield County, Virginia, to the express exclusion of
any otherwise permissible forum or venue.
4. Lease Agreement in Full Force and Effect. Except as expressly modified by this
Amendment, the Lease Agreement is unmodified, and all other terms and conditions of the Lease
Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. To the extent any provision of this Amendment
conflicts with the terms of the Lease Agreement, the terms and provisions of this Amendment shall
control.
[The remainder of this page is intentionally left blank.
Signatures follow on the subsequent page.]
Page 103 of 295
2
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Amendment to be executed by
their duly authorized representatives as of the date first written above.
VIRGINIA CREDIT UNION, INC.
By:_______________________________________
Its:_______________________________________
ATTEST: COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD, VIRGINIA
____________________________ By: ______________________________________
Clay Bowles James M. Holland, Chairman
Deputy County Administrator Board of Supervisors
Approved as to form:
___________________
Meredith E. Carpenter
Senior Assistant County Attorney
Page 104 of 295
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Meeting Date: October 30, 2024 Item Number: 14.C.4.
Subject:
Approve the Purchase of, and Initiate the Zoning Process for, a Parcel of Land at 15601 Route 1 for the
Appomattox Police Precinct Project
Board Action Requested:
Approve the purchase of, and initiate zoning for, a parcel of land containing 52.8 acres from Stream Realty
Acquisition, LLC.
Summary of Information:
Staff requests the Board approve the purchase of a parcel of land and building from Stream Realty, LLC
containing approximately 52.8 acres (a portion of GPIN 8016381121) at 15601 Route 1, South Chesterfield,
Virginia 23834.
The County and owner have negotiated a purchase agreement in the amount of $1,200,000 for this property, the
independently appraised value of the property. This acquisition allows the County to begin the process of
transitioning the Appomattox police precinct from leased space on West Hundred Road in Chester to a County-
owned facility, approved as part of the 2022 bond referendum, that can better support their current and future
operational needs. Additional advantages include access to major roads of Route 1 and Interstate 95, visibility
from Route 1, and room for potential growth. Funding for the acquisition is available from previously
appropriated reserve funds. Any surplus acreage will be be considered for future County uses, availability of
wetland credits to benefit future projects and potential future sale.
Virginia law permits the Board of Supervisors to initiate zoning applications on the principles of public
necessity, convenience, good zoning practice and general welfare. Consideration of this request will provide for
a public process to review and determine the appropriate zoning for the proposed use and if any adverse
impacts would be generated on the property(s) by such zoning changes, on adjacent property owners, or the
County in general and, if so, to determine what conditions might alleviate any adverse impacts and enhance
land use compatibility.
Attachments:
1. 15601 Route 1 parcel map - 241021
2. Purchase Agreement - 15601 Route 1 - FINAL
Preparer: Craig Willingham, Assistant Director, General Services
Page 105 of 295
Approved By:
Page 106 of 295
11
Page 107 of 295
PIN:___________________
Document No: __________
REAL ESTATE SALES CONTRACT
This Real Estate Sales Contract (this “Contract”) dated as of _____________, ____, 2024,
is by and between [STREAM REALTY ACQUISITION, LLC, Texas limited liability
company] [SELLER TO REVISE TO FEE OWNER PRIOR TO EXECUTION OF THIS
CONTRACT], 15601 Route 1, South Chesterfield, VA 23834 (“Seller”) and the COUNTY OF
CHESTERFIELD, VIRGINIA, a political subdivision of the Commonwealth of Virginia (the
“County”).
WHEREAS, Seller is the owner of that certain real property located in Chesterfield County,
Virginia, designated as Tax Map No. 801638112100000 known as 15601 Route 1, South
Chesterfield, VA 23834, containing 134.92 acres, more or less (the “Parcel”);
WHEREAS, Seller desires to sell, and the County desires to purchase for public use, a
portion of the Parcel consisting of approximately 52.8 acres located directly north of Ruffin Mill
Road and shown on Exhibit “A” attached hereto (to be defined via survey as part of this
transaction) (the “Property”);
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing recitals, incorporated herein, the
mutual covenants herein contained, and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and
sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows:
1. PURCHASE AND SALE OF THE PROPERTY. Subject to, and upon the terms and
conditions set forth in this Contract, Seller agrees to sell and convey the Property to the
County, and the County agrees to purchase from the Seller the Property, together with all
of Seller’s right and interest therein, including all improvements thereon and appurtenances
thereto. The exact dimensions and acreage of the Property shall be determined by a survey
obtained by the County prior to closing.
2. PURCHASE PRICE AND DEPOSIT. The purchase price for the Property shall be ONE
MILLION TWO HUNDRED THOUSAND and 0/100 DOLLARS ($1,200,000.00) (the
“Purchase Price”). Within five (5) business days following the date that the last party signs
this Contract, the County shall deliver to ____________ (“Escrow Agent” or “Title
Company”) a deposit (the “Deposit”) of Thirty Thousand and No/100 Dollars ($30,000.00)
by wire transfer of immediately available funds. The Deposit, with any interest accrued,
shall be applied towards the Purchase Price and shall be non-refundable to the County,
except as specifically provided in this Contract.
3. CONVEYANCE OF THE PROPERTY TO THE COUNTY. Seller shall convey the
Property to the County at Closing (as defined in Section 4, below) by General Warranty
Deed. The deed shall convey good and marketable fee simple title to the Property to the
Page 108 of 295
2
County, subject only to restrictions and conditions of record not adversely affecting the
title. “Good and marketable fee simple title” shall mean that the Property is free and clear
of all liens or encroachments, but subject to agreements, conditions, and restrictions now
of record not adversely affecting the title that are not objected to by the County during the
Due Diligence Period (defined below). In the event that the County provides written notice
to Seller, prior to the expiration of the Due Diligence Period, of any title objection and
Seller is unwilling or unable to cure said objection within a reasonable time established by
the County in its written notice to Seller, the County may terminate this Contract by
providing Seller written notice, in which event the Deposit shall be returned to the County,
and after the return of the Deposit, neither party shall have any further rights or obligations
hereunder, except as expressly provided herein.
4. CLOSING. Consummation of the sale by Seller and the purchase by the County of the
Property (the “Closing”) shall take place in the office of the Chesterfield County Attorney
or such other location agreed to by the parties on or before the date that is 120 days after
the date of this Contract. Provided that the County is actively pursuing the due diligence
examination of the Property but for reasons beyond its control requires more time to
complete such due diligence, upon written notice from the County to Seller, the Due
Diligence Period shall be extended for up to 30 days. At Closing, Seller shall deliver a
properly executed general warranty deed to the County and the County shall pay the
Purchase Price to Seller.
5. DUE DILIGENCE. For a period of ninety (90) days after the date that the last party signs
this Contract (the “Due Diligence Period”), upon Board of Supervisors approval, the
County may perform or have performed such due diligence examinations of the Property
to determine its suitability for the County’s intended use including, but not limited to,
zoning, title examinations, surveys, appraisals, environmental site assessments, wetland
delineations, soil studies, and inspections of the Property to determine the status of title,
physical condition of the Property and its general environmental condition and compliance
with all applicable environmental laws and to determine any environmental conditions
existing outside the Property which may potentially affect the environmental condition of
the Property (“Due Diligence”). Seller will provide the County and its agents,
representatives, officers, and employees reasonable access to the Property to complete such
inspections and testing. If the County, in its sole discretion, determines prior to expiration
of the Due Diligence Period that the Property is not suitable for its intended use, the County
may terminate this Contract upon written notice to Seller, in which event the Deposit shall
be returned to the County, and after the return of the Deposit, neither party shall have any
further rights or obligations hereunder, except as expressly provided herein. If the County
terminates the Contract under this Section, it shall repair any damage to the Property
directly caused by the County’s inspections or testing.
6. CLOSING COSTS. Seller shall pay the cost and expense for preparing the deed, the
“grantor’s” tax on the deed and the cost of Seller’s own attorneys. The County shall pay
the expense of a survey, the cost of recording the deed and the “grantee’s tax” if not exempt,
the cost of the title exam and title insurance, the cost of the County’s Due Diligence of the
Property, and the cost of the County’s own attorneys.
Page 109 of 295
3
7. RISK OF DAMAGE OR LOSS; CONDEMNATION. The risk of damage or loss to
Property by fire, act of God, or other casualty shall remain with Seller until the execution
and delivery of the deed of conveyance of the Property to the County at Closing. In the
event any material loss or damage occurs prior to Closing, Seller shall immediately notify
the County, and the County may terminate this Contract by providing written notice to
Seller, in which event the Deposit shall be returned to the County, and after the return of
the Deposit, neither party shall have any further rights or obligations hereunder, except as
expressly provided herein. If Seller receives written notice of an intent to condemn the
Property or a portion thereof from a condemning authority, then Seller shall immediately
notify the County and the County may terminate this Contract by providing written notice
to Seller, in which event the Deposit shall be returned to the County, and after the return
of the Deposit, neither party shall have any further rights or obligations hereunder, except
as expressly provided herein.
8. SUBDIVISION OF PROPERTY. Within ten (10) days after the date that the last party
signs this Contract, Seller shall request approval from the Chesterfield County Planning
Department to subdivide the Parcel to separate the Property from the remainder of the
Parcel and create a new parcel composed of only the Property. Seller shall timely submit
all required applications, plats, and information to the Chesterfield County Planning
Department to obtain subdivision approval prior to Closing.
9. SELLER’S WARRANTIES AND REPRESENTATIONS. Seller does hereby make the
following warranties and representations to the County, which shall survive closing for a
period of twelve (12) months:
A. Seller is the owner of good and marketable title to the subject Property, subject to
existing restrictions and conditions and agreements of record, and Seller’s title has
never been disputed or questioned, nor does Seller know of any facts by reason of
which Seller’s title or possession might be disputed or questioned.
B. Except as expressly represented in the following sentence, the Property is not
subject to any leases, subleases or tenants in possession. So long as this Contract is
in effect, Seller shall not enter into any agreement granting to any person any right
with respect to or any interest in the Property, or any portion thereof.
C. There are no taxes, assessments or levies of any type whatsoever rising out of or in
connection with the Property or the operation thereof which are currently past due.
D. To the best of Seller’s knowledge and belief, there is no action, suit, or proceeding
pending, threatened, contemplated against, or affecting, either directly or indirectly,
the Property.
E. Seller has not received any written notice from any governmental authority of a
violation of any laws, ordinances, rules, regulations, or orders relating to, or
regulating, the ownership, use, maintenance or repair of the Property.
Page 110 of 295
4
F. To Seller’s knowledge, no condemnation proceedings relating to the Property are
pending or threatened.
G. Seller shall not encumber the Property or allow the Property to be encumbered by
any liens, judgments, or charges which may affect the marketability of the title,
except as may exist against the Property as of the date of this Contract, other than
voluntary mortgages connected to Seller’s purchase of the Property (if this Contract
is entered into prior to Seller’s purchase of the Property) and voluntary mortgages
connected to Seller’s financing of the development of other real property owned by
Seller adjacent to the Property (“Voluntary Mortgages”). All liens, judgments, and
charges encumbering the Property, including Voluntary Mortgages placed after the
date of this Contract, must be released at Closing (collectively, the “Must Cure
Objections”); provided, however, that Seller shall not be required to expend in
excess of One Hundred Thousand and 00/100 Dollars ($100,000.00) (the “Must
Cure Cap”) in connection with any Must Cure Objection that is not a Voluntary
Mortgage. In the event that Buyer raises a title objection, Seller shall respond
within five (5) business days as to whether or not it will cure such objection. To
the extent a title objection (including a Must Cure Objection) exceeds the Must
Cure Cap, Seller will still respond within the same five (5) business day period as
to whether or not it will cure the objection. If Seller responds that it will not cure
the objection, or if Seller fails to respond within five (5) business days, such failure
shall be deemed a rejection to cure the objection and Buyer shall have the right to
terminate the Contract, in which event the Deposit will be returned to Buyer, or
Buyer may elect to proceed to Closing. Nothing herein shall limit or relieve Seller
from curing all Must Cure Objections that fall below the Must Cure Cap.
H. To the best of Seller’s knowledge and belief, at all times, the Property and all
present and prior uses of the Property have complied with all applicable
environmental laws, rules and regulations.
10. CONDITIONS PRECEDENT TO CLOSING. The County’s obligation to close on the
Property shall be conditioned on:
A. The County obtaining approval from the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors
to purchase the Property, provided that such approval is obtained prior to or during
Due Diligence;
B. The County’s appropriation of sufficient funds to purchase the Property;
C. The County’s determination in its sole discretion that the Property is suitable for its
intended public use, provided that such determination is made as part of completing
Due Diligence;
D. The representations and warranties made by Seller in Section 9 shall be true and
correct in all material respects on the date Seller executes this Contract and shall be
Page 111 of 295
5
true and correct in all material respects on and as of the date of Closing with the
same force and effect as if such representations had been made on and as of such
date; and
D. Seller shall have performed in all material respects all covenants and obligations
required by this Contract to be performed by it on or before the date of Closing.
The Seller’s obligation to sell the Property shall be conditioned on:
A. The County shall have performed in all material respects all covenants and
obligations required by this Contract to be performed by it on or before the date of
Closing.
If the foregoing conditions to Closing are not satisfied, the County, or Seller, as applicable, may
terminate this Contract upon written notice to the other party, in which event the Deposit shall be
returned to the County, and after the return of the Deposit, neither party shall have any further
rights or obligations hereunder, except as expressly provided herein.
11. DEFAULT. In the event Seller fails to perform any of Seller’s obligations under this
Contract and such failure continues for ten (10) days after receipt of written notice of such
failure from the County, then the County shall be entitled to either (1) terminate this
Contract upon written notice to the Seller, in which event the Deposit shall be returned to
the County and Seller shall reimburse the County for the County’s actual out-of-pocket
costs incurred in connection with investigating the Property and preparing for Closing, not
to exceed $30,000 in the aggregate or (2) demand and compel, by an action for specific
performance or similar legal proceedings, the immediate conveyance of the Property by
Seller in compliance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement. In the event the
County fails to perform any of the County’s obligations under this Contract and such failure
continues for ten (10) days after receipt of written notice of such failure from Seller, then ,
as Seller’s sole and exclusive remedy, Seller shall be entitled to terminate this Contract
upon written notice to the County and retain the Deposit as liquidated damages.
12. NOTICES. All notices and other communication authorized or required by this Contract
shall be delivered to the addresses set forth below by hand, courier service, reputable
overnight delivery service guaranteeing next business day delivery, certified mail or
registered mail with return receipt requested. Such notices or other communications shall
be effective (i) in the case of hand delivery or courier service, on the date of delivery, (ii)
if by overnight delivery service, one (1) business day after deposit thereof, and (iii) if by
certified or registered mail, the earlier of the date upon which receipt is acknowledged on
the return receipt or five (5) business days after the date of posting with the U.S. Post
Office. The notice addresses for Seller and the County are the following:
If to Seller:
c/o Stream Realty Partners-DC, L.P.
1601 K Street NW, Suite 1100
Page 112 of 295
6
Washington DC 20006
Attn: Dale Todd, Charlie Smiroldo
Email: dale.todd@streamrealty.com, charlie.smiroldo@streamrealty.com
With copy to:
Grossberg, Yochelson, Fox & Beyda, LLP
Attn: Richard F. Levin, Esq.
1200 New Hampshire Avenue, N.W., Suite 555
Washington, D.C. 20036
Email: levin@gyfb.com
If to the County:
___________________________
___________________________
___________________________
13. TIME IS OF THE ESSENCE. Time is of the essence under this Contract.
14. ENTIRE AGREEMENT. This Contract constitutes the entire agreement between the
parties, and it is understood and agreed that all prior agreements and discussions between
the parties are merged herein. No representations, promises, or inducements not included
herein shall be binding on any party hereto.
15. AMENDMENTS. This Contract may be amended or modified only by an agreement in
writing signed by both parties.
16. BINDING EFFECT. The provisions of this Contract shall inure to the benefit of and shall
be binding on the parties hereto and their respective heirs, devisees, successors, and assigns
and the legal representatives of their estates, as the case may apply.
17. ASSIGNMENT. This Contract shall not be assigned by either party without the prior
written consent of the other party. Any assignment in violation of this clause shall be null
and void and of no legal force.
18. SEVERABILITY. Whenever possible, each provision of this Contract shall be interpreted
in such a manner as to be valid under applicable law; but if any provision is ruled invalid
or unenforceable, it shall be ineffective to the extent of such invalidity or unenforceability
without affecting or invalidating the remainder of this Contract, which shall be enforceable
to the full extent allowed by law.
19. GOVERNING LAW AND VENUE. This Contract is to be governed by and interpreted
under the laws of the Commonwealth of Virginia. Any action arising out of this Contract
shall be brought in the Circuit Court of Chesterfield County, and in no other forum.
Page 113 of 295
7
20. HEADINGS. The headings used in this Contract are for convenience only and are not to
be used to interpret the Contract.
21. COUNTERPARTS. This Contract may be signed in one or more counterparts, each of
which is deemed to be an original, and all of which together constitute one and the same
instrument.
[SIGNATURE PAGE FOLLOWS]
Page 114 of 295
8
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Contract to be executed as
of the day and year first above written.
Seller:
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA
CITY/COUNTY OF ___________________, TO-WIT:
I, , a Notary Public in and for the City/County
and State aforesaid, do hereby certify that <<seller name>>, whose name as Seller is signed to
the foregoing and annexed writing, has acknowledged the same before me in my jurisdiction
aforesaid.
Given under my hand , 2024.
My commission expires: .
Registration Number: .
NOTARY PUBLIC
Page 115 of 295
9
COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD, VIRGINIA
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
BY:
SENIOR ASSISTANT COUNTY DEPUTY COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
ATTORNEY
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA
CITY/COUNTY OF ___________________, TO-WIT:
I, , a Notary Public in and for the City/County
and State aforesaid, do hereby certify that ____________________________, Deputy County
Administrator is signed on behalf of the County of Chesterfield, Virginia the foregoing and
annexed writing, has acknowledged the same before me in my jurisdiction aforesaid.
Given under my hand , 2022.
My commission expires: .
Registration Number: .
NOTARY PUBLIC
125701.1
Page 116 of 295
10
Exhibit A
[SELLER TO REPLACE WITH SURVEY PRIOR TO EXECUTION]
Page 117 of 295
11
Page 118 of 295
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Meeting Date: October 30, 2024 Item Number: 14.C.5.
Subject:
Transfer Funds and Grant Authorization to Proceed with Rockwood Park Access Road
Board Action Requested:
The Board is requested to transfer funds and authorize staff to proceed with design of the Rockwood Park
Access Road.
Summary of Information:
The Board is requested to transfer $450,000 from the General Road Improvement Account for the design of the
Rockwood Park Access Road project. The project involves relocating the entrance to the park located on Hull
Street Road to align with Oxbridge Road. The access road is primarily proposed as a two-lane road with a
shared-use path. The road will be designed to allow future road connections from Rockwood Plaza and an
extension of Amberdale Drive. A pedestrian connection from the Amberleigh development will be evaluated
for potential inclusion in the project. Preliminary engineering will include determining the most feasible
alignment and the impacts to determine an anticipated construction cost before holding a public meeting to gain
input. Additional funds will be required for future phases.
Attachments:
1. Attachment A - Project Location Map
Preparer: Chessa Walker, Director of Transportation
Approved By:
Page 119 of 295
Page 120 of 295
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Meeting Date: October 30, 2024 Item Number: 14.C.6.
Subject:
Acceptance of State Roads
Board Action Requested:
Adoption of resolutions for the referenced state roads acceptances.
Summary of Information:
Clover Hill District: Wadsworth Drive (Portion)
Matoaca District: Loyal Avenue (Portion)
Wynwood at Foxcreek Section 16
Midlothian District: Garnett Lane (Remainder)
Attachments:
1. 2024-10-30 - Clover Hill - Wadsworth Drive (Portion)
2. 2024-10-30 - Matoaca - Loyal Avenue (Portion)
3. 2024-10-30- Matoaca - Wynwood at Foxcreek Section 16
4. 2024-10-30 - Midlothian - Garnett Lane (Remainder)
Preparer: Scott Smedley, Director of Environmental Engineering
Approved By:
Page 121 of 295
Page 122 of 295
Page 123 of 295
Page 124 of 295
Page 125 of 295
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Meeting Date: October 30, 2024 Item Number: 14.C.7.
Subject:
Approval of Fifth Amendment to the Employment Agreement for the County Administrator
Board Action Requested:
The Board is requested to approve the attached Fifth Amendment to the County Administrator’s Employment
Agreement.
Summary of Information:
Following the recent performance evaluation of the County Administrator, the Board voted to increase the
annual salary of the County Administrator by six percent effective retroactive to the biweekly payment issued
on September 1, 2024. Additionally, the Board agrees that Dr. Casey will receive a six percent salary increase
effective September 1, 2025. These salary adjustments are not inclusive of any future merit salary increases
which may be provided to County employees generally. All other terms of the Employment Agreement will
remain in place. The Fifth Amendment to the Employment Agreement is attached.
Attachments:
1. Fifth Amendment to Employment Agreement
Preparer: Jeff Mincks, County Attorney
Approved By:
Page 126 of 295
133995.1
Fifth Amendment to Employment Agreement
THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into as of this 30th day of October 2024, by and
between the BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD, the
governing body of a political subdivision of the Commonwealth of Virginia (“Board”), and DR.
JOSEPH P. CASEY (“Dr. Casey”):
WHEREAS, the Fourth Amendment to Employment Agreement established the annual
salary for Dr. Casey as of January 20, 2024; and
WHEREAS, the Board has voted to increase the annual salary for Dr. Casey by six percent
that will be considered his Compensation and Benefits retroactive to the biweekly payment to Dr.
Casey on September 1, 2024, and to further amend the Employment Agreement as described
below;
WHEREAS, the parties desire to amend the Employment Agreement to reflect the new
agreement of the parties.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Board and Dr. Casey agree to the following:
1. The Board agrees to pay Dr. Casey an annual salary that is six percent above his current
salary. The new salary will be effective retroactive to the biweekly payment to Dr. Casey on
September 1, 2024. In addition, the Board agrees Dr. Casey will receive a six percent salary
increase effective September 1, 2025. These salary adjustments are not inclusive of any future
merit salary increases which may be provided to County employees generally.
2. All other terms of the Employment Agreement not inconsistent with this Fifth Amendment
shall remain in full force and effect.
Given under our hands as of this ____ day of October 2024.
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE
COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD
By: _____________________________
James Holland, Chair
Approved as to form:
_________________________________
County Attorney
_________________________________
Dr. Joseph P. Casey
Page 127 of 295
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Meeting Date: October 30, 2024 Item Number: 17.B.1.
Subject:
23SN0041 - North Hallsley - Midlothian
Board Action Requested:
Summary of Information:
Attachments:
1. 23SN0041-PP
2. 23SN0041-Disclosure
3. 23SN0041-2024OCT30-BOS-RPT
Preparer:
Approved By:
Page 128 of 295
23SN0041 - Midlothian
Rezone from Residential Townhouse (R-TH) to Residential
(R-15) District.
North Hallsley
Case 23SN0041, in the Midlothian Magisterial District, North Hallsley is a request to
rezone to from Residential Townhouse (R-TH) to Residential (R-15) District. A
residential development containing a maximum of 340 single family dwellings is
proposed.
1Page 129 of 295
23SN0041 - Overview
1. Permit up to 340
dwellings
2. Single-family homes
with neighborhood
recreational uses
proposed
3. Part of the Roseland
Zoning Overlay District
4. Planning Commission
and Staff recommend
approval
Overview Slide.
2Page 130 of 295
23SN0041 – Zoning Map
The Property contains 301.96 acres and is zoned Residential Townhouse (R-TH)
District. Area properties are zoned a mix of residential and agricultural to the north,
south and east. Properties to the west are zoned for commercial or residential
townhouse uses as part of the original Roseland zoning approval.
3Page 131 of 295
23SN0041 – Aerial & Land Use Plan Map
The first image on the left shows the Property as being primarily vacant and
wooded. Adjoining properties to the south are developed with single-family
residences or common area inside the Hallsley subdivision. Properties to the west
remain largely undeveloped and were zoned with the original Roseland zoning
request. Properties to the east are developed with single-family residences or
remain vacant with access to Scottwood Road. An existing rail line borders the
property to the north.
The second image on the right shows the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Plan. The
Land Use Plan designation for the property is Suburban Residential I, which
suggests the Property is appropriate for residential development at a maximum
density of 2.0 dwellings per acre.
4Page 132 of 295
23SN0041 - Roseland Zoning
Overlay District
The Property was originally rezoned for residential use in August 2008 as part of the
original Roseland zoning request. However, development of this property and
others in the case geography have not occurred. To help facilitate new development
opportunities for properties within the original Roseland zoning case, the County
and stakeholders developed a new zoning overlay for these properties. The
Property is now located within the Roseland Zoning Overlay District. The intent of
the District is to allow for flexibility while maintaining the development concepts
envisioned by the original zoning approval for Roseland (Case 07SN0223). The
Property is within the Suburban Residential District, one of several use districts
outlined in the Overlay. The purpose of the Suburban Residential District is to
provide for lower density detached single family dwellings that are comparable to
those homes found in the neighboring Hallsley community. Permitted uses in this
district are limited to:
Single-family detached dwellings;
Recreational neighborhood facilities primarily serving the surrounding residential
community; and
Accessory dwelling units.
5Page 133 of 295
Development standards apply to each of the development tracts in the District. The
Property is designated as a part of Tract A. This portion of Tract A is limited to a
maximum of 340 single family dwelling units.
5Page 134 of 295
23SN0041 - Conceptual Plan
The applicant’s conceptual plan is shown in the current slide. The development
would include interconnected roadways that connect to the adjoining arterial
roadway (being Old Hundred Road and Brightwalton Road); pedestrian scale
streetscapes with street trees; design requirements for front porches or stoops;
sidewalks on both sides of internal streets (except as otherwise provided in the
District); the Main Line Trail and a linear park component that is internal to the
development; and programmable common area with neighborhood recreational
uses interspersed throughout the project.
6Page 135 of 295
23SN0041 - Proffered Conditions
1. Architectural/Design Elements
2. Road cash proffer plus transportation contribution
3. Utility cash proffer payment
4. Amenities
The applicant has proffered additional design requirements as part of this request.
These architecture and design elements are in addition to those elements already
required by the Roseland Zoning Overlay District. Design standards for dwellings
include defined styles and forms that are compatible to those found in Hallsley,
front elevation variation, specified building and roof materials (prohibiting the use
of vinyl siding), masonry foundations, and the treatment of garages, porches,
stoops, and chimneys/direct vent fireplaces
The applicant has proffered a road cash proffer in tandem with planned off-site
road improvements. In accordance with the Roseland Zoning Overlay District
Section, road improvements are identified to mitigate the traffic impacts of the
development. In addition to the road cash proffer payment and road improvements,
the applicant proffers to provide a transportation contribution payment of $2,440
for each primary dwelling unit, to cover the development’s portion of the
drainage/road crossing of Tomahawk Creek for the East/West Major Arterial
(“known as Roseland Avenue”).
Payment of a Utility Cash Proffer (UCP) payment has also been proffered for each
7Page 136 of 295
equivalent residential unit (ERU). This payment will go towards public water storage
and supply improvements needed for the public water system to address the
demands of the overall Roseland development.
Lastly, amenities have been proffered as well. A community pool and sheltered area
with bathrooms is proposed with phasing requirements in the proffered condiƟons.
7Page 137 of 295
23SN0041 - Updates to the Request
1. Relocation of recreational neighborhood area
2. Minimize tree removal near wastewater trunk line
3. Prohibit construction in FEMA floodplain
4. Drainage certification for individual lots
5. Two minor updates to the proffered conditions (4.c and 14)
Staff notes that the applicant has worked to address community concerns with the
proposal and provided staff with an updated conceptual plan and proffered
conditions for the proposal. To address community concerns, the applicant has
proffered a revised location for the neighborhood recreational area, a requirement
to minimize tree removal around the wastewater trunk line extension, prohibit
specific construction inside the FEMA floodplain, and require drainage certification
for each residential lot.
After the August 20, 2024 Planning Commission hearing, the applicant provided
staff with two updates to the proffered conditions for the Property. A clarification to
Proffered Condition 4.c (Utility Cash Proffer) was added and a correction to a
proffered condition reference in Proffered Condition 14 (Construction Access &
Signage for the Saville Chase Trail Extension) was submitted on August 22, 2023.
8Page 138 of 295
23SN0041 - Recommendations
1. Planning Commission – Approval.
2. Staff Recommendation - Approval.
•Use and density comply with Plan recommendation
•Provides connections and adequate transition
•High-quality, visually attractive housing option
•Traffic impact addressed with cash payments, transportation
contribution and road improvements
The Planning Commission recommends approval of the request. Staff continues to
recommend approval of the applicant’s request. The applicant’s request complies
with the Comprehensive Plan’s land use designation that supports suburban
residential uses on the Property. The proposed residential density of 1.13 dwelling
units per acre falls below the Plan’s maximum residential density of 2.0 dwellings
per acre. The development concept provides an amenitized residential community
with vehicular access to Old Hundred Road, Brightwalton Road, and the extension
of stub roads to the south and southwest (Hallsley Subdivision). Future connections
elsewhere around the perimeter of the development in the form of new stub roads
have also been provided. In addition, the development’s proposed site layout will
support the Plan’s guidelines relative to land use transition, compatibility of uses,
and integration of roadway and pedestrian facilities with existing area development.
Quality neighborhood design, recreational amenities, and architectural elements
proffered by the applicant would create a unique and high-quality development
that is consistent with the surrounding community.
The development’s traffic impact will be addressed by proffered cash payments, a
transportaƟon contribuƟon, and road improvements.
9Page 139 of 295
23SN0041 – Zoning Map
End of Presentation.
10Page 140 of 295
23SN0041
Page 141 of 295
Page 142 of 295
North Hallsley 23SN0041 Page 1 of 39
23SN0041 – North Hallsley
Magisterial District – Midlothian
Applicant – John Hauserman (804-643-4200)
BOS Public Hearing – October 30, 2024
Time Remaining
12 Months
Case Manager
Ryan Ramsey
(804-751-4474)
Request
Rezoning
A single family development with up to 340 dwellings is
proposed.
Planning Commission Recommendation
Approval
Staff Recommendation
Approval
The Property*
1222 Old Hundred Road
*See Complete Parcel List
Site Size
301.96 Acres
Comprehensive Plan –
Land Use Designation
Suburban Residential I
Plan Area
County Wide Plan
Figure 1: Aerial of Request Area – Click Image for Link to GIS
Figure 2: Area Map of Request & Land Use Plan Map
Rezoning from Residential Townhouse (R-TH) to Residential (R-15) District.
A residential development containing a maximum of 340 single family dwellings is proposed. A community comprised
of single family detached residences with associated neighborhood recreational facilities is planned. The applicant
intends to conform to the permitted uses and development standards provided in the Roseland Zoning Overlay
District. Total residential density for the project would yield 1.13 dwelling units per acre. The applicant’s conceptual
plan (Exhibit A) shows a total of 340 lots.
Summary of Proposal
Page 143 of 295
North Hallsley 23SN0041 Page 2 of 39
PLANNING COMMISSION - APPROVAL
STAFF - APPROVAL
The applicant’s request complies with the Comprehensive Plan’s land use designation that supports suburban residential
uses on the Property. The proposed residential density of 1.13 dwelling units per acre falls below the Plan’s maximum
residential density of 2.0 dwellings per acre. The development concept provides an amenitized residential community
with vehicular access to Old Hundred Road, Brightwalton Road, and the extension of stub roads to the south and
southwest (Hallsley Subdivision). Future connections elsewhere around the perimeter of the development in the form of
new stub roads have also been provided. In addition, the development’s proposed site layout will support the Plan’s
guidelines relative to land use transition, compatibility of uses, and integration of roadway and pedestrian facilities with
existing area development. Quality neighborhood design, recreational amenities, and architectural elements proffered by
the applicant would create a unique and high-quality development that is consistent with the surrounding community.
The development’s traffic impact will be addressed by proffered cash payments, a transportation contribution, and road
improvements.
NOTES FOR THE PLANNING COMMISSION AND BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
1. The property owner may proffer conditions.
2. Proffered conditions and a conceptual plan have been submitted by the applicant.
3. Both the Planning Commission and Staff recommend acceptance of Proffered Conditions 1-3, 5-13, and 15-17
offered by the applicant. Staff recommends acceptance Proffered Conditions 4 and 14, modified by the applicant
on August 22, 2024.
After the August 28, 2024 Board of Supervisors hearing, the applicant provided staff with updated proffered conditions
for the Property. A clarification to Proffered Condition 4.c (Utility Cash Proffer) and a correction to a proffered condition
reference in Proffered Condition 14 (Construction Access & Signage for the Saville Chase Trail Extension) was submitted
on August 22, 2024. A redline version of these changes to the proffered conditions is provided in this report.
After the September 25, 2024 Board of Supervisors hearing, the applicant is continuing to work with community
stakeholders and staff to address concerns expressed at the last public hearing. Additional revisions to the proffered
conditions are anticipated but have not been reflected in this staff report. Additional time may be necessary to finalize
any revisions to this zoning request.
Recommendations
Updates to the Zoning Request Since the August
& September Board of Supervisors Hearings
Page 144 of 295
North Hallsley 23SN0041 Page 3 of 39
Summary of Proposal .............................................................................................................................................................. 1
Recommendations .................................................................................................................................................................. 2
Updates to the Zoning Request Since the August & September Board of Supervisors Hearings .......................................... 2
Table of Contents .................................................................................................................................................................... 3
Planning................................................................................................................................................................................... 4
Current Zoning Map .............................................................................................................................................................. 10
Parcels in Application (The Property – Table A) ................................................................................................................ 11
Supplemental Analysis .......................................................................................................................................................... 11
Budget & Management ..................................................................................................................................................... 11
Community Enhancement ................................................................................................................................................ 11
Environmental Engineering ............................................................................................................................................... 11
Fire & Emergency Medical Services .................................................................................................................................. 12
Libraries ............................................................................................................................................................................. 12
Parks & Recreation ............................................................................................................................................................ 12
Police ................................................................................................................................................................................. 13
Schools .............................................................................................................................................................................. 14
Transportation - County Department of Transportation .................................................................................................. 16
Transportation - Virginia Department of Transportation ................................................................................................. 17
Utilities – Water and Wastewater .................................................................................................................................... 19
Community Engagement & Public Hearings ......................................................................................................................... 20
Proffered Conditions (8/22/2024) ........................................................................................................................................ 21
Proffered Conditions (8/22/2024) - Redlined ....................................................................................................................... 28
Conceptual Plan – Exhibit A .................................................................................................................................................. 35
Case Contacts ........................................................................................................................................................................ 36
Appendix ............................................................................................................................................................................... 37
Budget & Management ..................................................................................................................................................... 37
Community Facilities and Infrastructure .......................................................................................................................... 37
Fire & Emergency Medical Services .................................................................................................................................. 37
Schools .............................................................................................................................................................................. 39
Table of Contents
Page 145 of 295
North Hallsley 23SN0041 Page 4 of 39
Zoning History
07SN0233: Approved (8/2008)
Rezoning to residential townhouse (R-TH) of 1,189.9 acres and Community Business (C-3) of 211 acres with a conditional
use planned development for exceptions to Ordinance requirements. The proposal provided mix of residential,
commercial, office, and light industrial uses with traditional neighborhood design elements. Residential development
was limited to 5,140 principal dwelling units plus 400 secondary (carriage house) dwelling units. A minimum of 500,000
gross square feet of non-residential development was also conditioned. Conditions of approval addressed: a master
plan, road improvements and phasing requirements, access, density (Planning & Transportation limits), housing types
(senior and age-restricted housing), stormwater management, covenants, and a cash proffer payment.
Comprehensive Plan – Land Use Plan Designation
The Comprehensive Plan designates the Property for Suburban Residential I, which suggests the Property is appropriate
for residential development at a maximum density of 2.0 dwellings per acre.
Roseland Zoning Overlay District
The Property is located within the Roseland Zoning Overlay District (“the District”). The District was adopted on January
25, 2023 to provide master-planned mixed-use community with high-quality development standards. The intent of the
District is to allow for flexibility while maintaining the development concepts envisioned by the original zoning approval
for Roseland (Case 07SN0223). Guiding principles of the District include:
• Establishment of a Linear Park system along the Tomahawk Creek corridor.
• An interconnected trail network providing cycling and pedestrian opportunities throughout the community
including a “Main Line Trail” linking the Linear Park system together with surrounding development.
• An adequate road network to address traffic impacts and create a safe and efficient multimodal transportation
network that promotes context-sensitive and innovative design.
o The network should provide interconnectivity and high-quality streetscapes which serve as focal
features for buildings and open spaces.
• Buildings consisting of high-quality materials and design which provide visual interest and durability to stand the
test of time.
• Protection and preservation of environmentally sensitive areas using alternative stormwater systems, low-
impact development techniques and establishment of significant greenspace along major stream corridors and
throughout the overall community.
Conditions of Case 07SN0223 remain valid for properties in the District until a property or tract is rezoned. Any rezoning
request submitted on property located within the Roseland Zoning Overlay District boundaries must comply with the
standards required by the Chesterfield County Zoning Ordinance, unless otherwise granted by the Chesterfield
County Board of Supervisors where such approval would advance the guiding principles of the District. The previously
approved conditions of Case 07SN0223 will become void for any individual development tract once a subsequent
rezoning is approved by the Board of Supervisors.
Use Districts for the Roseland Zoning Overlay District
The Property is within the Suburban Residential District, one of several use districts outlined in the Roseland Zoning
Overlay District (Figure 3). The purpose of the Suburban Residential District is to provide for lower density detached
single family dwellings that are comparable to that found in the Hallsley community. Permitted uses in this district are
limited to:
• Single-family detached dwellings;
• Recreational neighborhood facilities primarily serving the surrounding residential community; and
• Accessory dwelling units.
Planning
Page 146 of 295
North Hallsley 23SN0041 Page 5 of 39
Figure 3 – Use Districts within the Roseland Zoning Overlay District(Figure 19.1-394.A. from the Zoning Ordinance). The Property is highlighted in
red.
Development Standards for the Roseland Zoning Overlay District
Development standards apply to each of the development tracts in the District. The Property is designated as a part of
Tract A (Figure 4). Tract A is limited to a maximum of 340 single family dwelling units. The Ordinance also provides
development standards for specific road improvements (including street trees, sidewalks and shared use pathways),
parks and recreational amenities (Linear Park, trail system and common area), and residential bulk requirements for lots
and detached dwellings in the Suburban Residential District. Further details on these requirements are provided in
Section 19.1-395 of the Ordinance.
Additional residential standards that apply to all residential buildings (and amenity buildings) include hardscaped
treatment for driveways, front porch requirements and treatment of the porch foundation, screening for heating,
ventilation and air conditioning (HVAC) units and generators, foundation plantings for front and side elevations visible to
a street, limitation on front-loaded garage widths, and provisions to encourage rear-loaded garages. Further
requirements for accessory dwelling units, buffers, public parks and recreational neighborhood facilities (public address
systems) are also addressed in Section 19.1-395.G.
The Property
Page 147 of 295
North Hallsley 23SN0041 Page 6 of 39
Figure 4 – Tracts in the Roseland Zoning Overlay District (Figure 19.1-395.A. from the Zoning Ordinance). The Property is flagged with a green label.
Proposal
A community consisting of a maximum of 340 single family dwellings is proposed (Figure 5). Single family detached
dwellings located on individual lots are planned. The development would include interconnected roadways that connect
to the adjoining arterial roadway (Old Hundred Road and Brightwalton Road); pedestrian scale streetscapes with street
trees; design requirements for front porches or stoops; sidewalks on both sides of internal streets (except as otherwise
provided in the District); the Main Line Trail and a linear park component that is internal to the development; and
programmable common area with neighborhood recreational uses interspersed throughout the project.
The Property
Page 148 of 295
North Hallsley 23SN0041 Page 7 of 39
Figure 5 – Conceptual Plan showing the layout of the subdivision, with lots, roadways, pathways, amenities, and environmental features.
Design
High quality residential development addresses the Comprehensive Plan goals for strong and sustainable neighborhoods
that are visually attractive, well-planned and well-maintained. Further, the purpose and intent of the zoning ordinance
to promote the health, safety, convenience and general welfare of the public includes the creation of convenient,
attractive and harmonious communities, protection against overcrowding of land, and protection of the natural
environment. As such, developments that promote unique, viable and long-lasting places and enhance the community
are encouraged.
The applicant has proffered design requirements as part of this request. Community design elements include a
conceptual plan layout (Proffered Conditions 1 & 2, Exhibit A – Figure 5) with specified areas for lots, roads and road
connections, pathways, common area and open space for active/passive recreation amenities. A community pool and
sheltered area with bathrooms is proposed (Proffered Condition 8). Amenities located in common areas would require a
homeowners’ association for long term maintenance of these improvements. These facilities would be under
construction prior to the issuance of the 62nd building permit. Lot and project design standards have been proffered to
include front walkways for dwelling units (Proffered Condition 3). Design standards for dwellings include defined styles
and forms that are compatible to those found in Hallsley, front elevation variation, specified building and roof materials
(prohibiting the use of vinyl siding), masonry foundations, and the treatment of garages, porches, stoops, and
chimneys/direct vent fireplaces (Proffered Condition 3).
Road Connections to Hallsley & Scottwood Road
The applicant’s Conceptual Plan shows several roadway connections to adjoining properties, including three (3)
connections to stub roads that exist within the Hallsley development. The applicant’s proposal includes a connection to
Alsdell Road (east), Dunleer Way, and Saville Chase Trail (Figure 5). The connection to Saville Chase Trail includes two (2)
road configuration options. The first option shown on the overall plan includes Saville Chase Trail being extended into
the Property as a new cul-de-sac. This extension of Saville Chase Trail as a cul-de-sac would not tie into the road network
Page 149 of 295
North Hallsley 23SN0041 Page 8 of 39
for the rest of the Property. Staff notes that this road configuration requires an exception be granted by the Virginia
Department of Transportation (VDOT) since it does not provide the necessary connectivity between residential
developments. VDOT has not granted this exception at time of zoning.
To address this potential design concern, the applicant has provided an alternative road layout as a second option
(Option B on the Conceptual Plan – Figure 6) that meets VDOT standards. Option B provides a through road connection
to the remainder of the Property being developed on the western side of the Property. The applicant has also proffered
to submit a waiver request to VDOT at time of preliminary plat or constriction plan approval (whichever occurs first) to
determine if the extended cul-de-sac option can be accepted. If the waiver is approved, the developer will be
responsible for providing this road design option (Proffered Condition 15).
Figure 6 – Highlight of Option B (right) as a possible road design for the connection to Saville Chase Trail in the Hallsley subdivision.
The Property is partially bisected by the existing right-of-way of
Scottwood Road (Figure 7). The applicant worked with VDOT
during the zoning process to confirm that a public road
connection from this development would not be required.
Therefore, the applicant’s proposal does not show a public road
connection to Scottwood Road on the Conceptual Plan.
However, a gated road for emergency access is shown on the
Conceptual Plan. This emergency access connection may be
required if an exception to Section 17-76 of the Subdivision
Ordinance (“Arrangement & Design”) is requested by the
applicant at time of preliminary plat review. The Ordinance
permits a maximum of fifty (50) lots to be served by a local
street with a sole access point. Additional relief to this
requirement may be provided from the Director of Planning or
the Planning Commission at time of preliminary plat review.
Figure 7 – Highlight of Scottwood Road and a possible
emergency access road that could be requested and reviewed at
time of preliminary plat.
Page 150 of 295
North Hallsley 23SN0041 Page 9 of 39
Phasing of Subdivision Development Adjoining Saville Chase Trail
Based on community feedback, the applicant has proffered a restriction that prohibits construction plan approval from
being granted before January 1, 2031 (Proffered Condition 13) for any future lots being served by Saville Chase Trail or a
subdivision section adjoining GPIN 708-700-4546 (shown on the Current Zoning Map). This delay will preclude land
disturbance activity in the vicinity of specific lots/parcels in the Hallsley subdivision.
Connection to Saville Chase Trail
In response to concerns expressed by area residents relative to construction traffic accessing the request property from
Saville Chase Trail, Proffered Condition 14 provides for the installation of signs and a barricade adjacent to the Saville
Chase Trail stub-out prior to site development. This temporary barricade would remain until removal of the barricade is
required by VDOT or the Transportation Department for public street acceptance. This provision does not apply to
construction traffic that is associated with constructing a dwelling as part of the extended cul-de-sac design. However,
construction traffic for dwellings as part of the through road design would be prohibited (Proffered Condition 14.a).
Signs would be installed by the developer at the Property line (Saville Chase Trail stub-out) to deter access by
construction traffic. Signage would be maintained by the owner/developer until road and infrastructure construction
activity has ceased on the Property.
To further address community concerns with this future road connection, the applicant has proffered to restore the
vacated temporary turnaround easement area of those lots fronting the current terminus of Saville Chase Trail
(Proffered Condition 16). This would include using equal or better lawn, irrigation, dwelling underdrains, or driveway
materials.
Common Area
The Conceptual Plan shows generally the location of lots, roads, sidewalks, amenity areas, common area, and open
space. Common area, as it relates to minimum area required and programming for these areas, will be further evaluated
and approved at time of plans review.
Findings
As suggested by the Comprehensive Plan goals and the Zoning Ordinance, the proffered conditions of this request
include quality design and architectural elements that are consistent in quality to that of the existing and planned area
development. The proposed residential use and density complies with the Plan’s land use designation. The Roseland
Zoning Overlay District will provide additional development standards to ensure high-quality development is developed
on the Property. The development’s proposed site design and connections for roadway/pedestrian facilities support the
Plan’s guidelines for land use transition and integration of roadway and pedestrian facilities with existing area
development. Staff supports this request.
Page 151 of 295
North Hallsley 23SN0041 Page 10 of 39
Current Zoning Map
GPIN
708-700-4546
Page 152 of 295
North Hallsley 23SN0041 Page 11 of 39
GPIN Address
709-700-8908 16707 SAVILLE CHASE RD
709-701-7328 16410 SCOTTWOOD RD
710-700-7596 16408 SCOTTWOOD RD
710-703-3345 16300 SCOTTWOOD RD
711-699-3470 (PART OF) 1222 OLD HUNDRED RD
711-700-1144 16407 SCOTTWOOD RD
711-701-5180 16301 SCOTTWOOD RD
712-699-7663 1132 OLD HUNDRED RD
No comment on this request.
No comment on this request.
1. The subject parcels are located within the Upper Swift Creek Watershed.
2. A Natural Resource Inventory (NRI) has been approved for the subject parcels.
3. To address citizen concerns with improvements inside the FEMA floodplain, the applicant has proffered to
prohibit the construction of buildings, parking or hardscape areas inside the floodplain (Proffered Condition 8)
4. Steep slopes are difficult to stabilize when disturbed, therefore, steep slopes should remain in their natural,
undisturbed state to the maximum extent practicable.
a. The applicant has offered Proffered Condition 9 to address this impact.
5. Increased runoff from new development may adversely impact downstream properties.
a. The applicant has offered Proffered Condition 10 to address this impact.
6. To address water quality concerns during construction, enhanced erosion and sediment control measures above
those required by state regulations shall be provided. These include the use of super silt fence, sediment traps
and basins sized 25% larger than the minimum standard, and the application of anionic polyacrylamide (PAM) or
an approved equivalent to denuded areas during construction.
a. The applicant has offered Proffered Conditions 11a, 11b and 11c to address these impacts.
7. To address potential impact of individual lot drainage, a certification for each lot will be required prior to
certificate of occupancy approval to show that 1) positive drainage away from the dwelling foundation is being
provided and 2) grading on the lot and the drainage infrastructure conform to approve plans (Proffered
Condition 17).
8. The project will be subject to the Virginia Stormwater Management Program Regulations.
Parcels in Application (The Property – Table A)
Supplemental Analysis
Budget & Management
Community Enhancement
Environmental Engineering
Page 153 of 295
North Hallsley 23SN0041 Page 12 of 39
Service Area
The Midlothian Fire Station, Company Number 5
Community Fire Protection Capabilities Assessment*
Insurance Service Office (ISO) Public Protection Classification (PPC) Class 10W
Anticipated Impacts On Fire & EMS
Call Load in Immediate Service Area During Previous Fiscal Year 1231
Projected Calls Generated Yearly by Proposed Development 51
Projected Call Load Increase in Immediate Service Area by Proposed Development 4%
Drive And Response Times
Response Zone/Response Time Goal* Rural/12
Minutes
Road Miles from Closest Fire Station 6.8 miles
Estimated Drive Time from Closest Fire Station1 12 minutes
Estimated Response Time for First Unit on Scene2 15 minutes
Additional Information
When the property is developed, the number of hydrants, quantity of water needed for fire
protection, and access requirements will be evaluated during the plans review process.
*Additional information relative to Fire & Life Safety’s Mission and Service Profile, Community
Fire Protection Capabilities Assessment, and Response Time Goals can be found in the Appendix.
1 Drive-time estimates are exclusive of potential delays due to weather, traffic, or blockage of response routes.
2 Estimates assume response units and personnel are in the station and available to respond at the time of an incident and include 1
min 30 sec for 911 call processing and dispatch, and up to 1 min 30 sec for firefighter turnout.
Nearby Facilities – Midlothian Library (6.8 miles)
1. While all county libraries could be potentially impacted by the proposed development, the Midlothian Library is
the closest library facility to the Property.
2. The Public Facilities Plan recommends a new library in the vicinity of Otterdale Road and Genito Roads to
address service gaps and demand issues related to increases in population anticipated in this area of the county.
Land for expansion or replacement of this facility or new facility has not been acquired.
No comment on this request.
Fire & Emergency Medical Services
Libraries
Parks & Recreation
Page 154 of 295
North Hallsley 23SN0041 Page 13 of 39
Division Beat District
Swift Creek 17 Midlothian
Road Miles from Closest Division Facility 7.9
Current Officers per 1,000 County Residents 1.49
Crime Rate for Group A Incidents1 per 100,000 Residents 3.8
Anticipated Increase in District Calls for Service 167
Average Response Time for Priority One Calls
Average Response Time / Priority One Time Goal2 4.49 Min. /
< 3 Min.
Planned Capital Facility Improvements
There are no new Police facilities planned for this area in the immediate future.
Additional Information
The proposed development is projected to generate an additional 167 calls for service, annually.
1 Includes crimes such as, but not limited to: assault, larceny, murder, burglary, and robbery.
2 Response-time estimates are exclusive of potential delays due to weather, traffic, or blockage of response routes.
Police
Page 155 of 295
North Hallsley 23SN0041 Page 14 of 39
This application is for a development containing a maximum of 340 single family lots. The total potential student yield
for this development ranges from 153 to 224 students at full build out.
Membership and Capacity Zoning Case: 23SN0041
Current
Enrollment
(09-30-2023)
Program
Capacity (1)
Program
Capacity
Percentage
Proposed
Number of
Units Housing Type
SGF 2023 (2) Anticipated Student Yield
Range
School
Specific Countywide
Average School
Specific Countywide
Average
Old Hundred
Elementary 991 933 106%
340 Single Family
0.36
0.20
122.00
68.00
- Multi-Family -
- - -
- Condo -
- - -
- Townhouse -
- - -
340 122
68
Midlothian
Middle 1,293 1,406 92%
340 Single Family
0.12
0.10
41.00
34.00
- Multi-Family -
- - -
- Condo -
- - -
- Townhouse -
- - -
340 41
34
Midlothian
High 1,986 2,040 97%
340 Single Family
0.18
0.15
61.00
51.00
- Multi-Family -
- - -
- Condo -
- - -
- Townhouse -
- - -
340 61
51
Notes:
(1) Program capacity is the maximum number of students the building can accommodate based on the Virginia Department of Education Standards
of Quality and the current school programming that may adjust the number of rooms used for core or grade-level classrooms in the overall building
design capacity. Program capacity numbers may be higher than previous years due to more spaces being designated/quantified for capacity uses.
Updated annually by CCPS on September 30.
(2) Student Generation Factor is the actual total number of students by grade level divided by the actual total number of housing units by housing
type. Based upon the average number of students per townhome dwelling unit for each of the school attendance zones where the proposal is
located. Updated annually by IST every December.
*The Strategic Information Sharing (StratIS) forecasting model predicts where students are expected to be living in the future; for clarification, this
model does not predict student enrollment as there are other programming variables outside of modeling capabilities (i.e. specialty programming,
waivers, or specialty centers) that effect actual enrollment figures.
Schools
Page 156 of 295
North Hallsley 23SN0041 Page 15 of 39
School Capacity Analysis
Old Hundred
Elementary:
Current program capacity at Old Hundred Elementary is at 106 percent. While the total potential yield
from this case could range up to sixty-eight (68) to 122 elementary students at full build out, the numbers
of potential students generated on an annual basis will change incrementally while this development is
under construction. This school is forecasting to be at 101.8 percent of program capacity by 2028. The
approved Capital Improvement Plan includes the Old Hundred Area Elementary School project that will
provide additional capacity and the opportunity to balance enrollment at the elementary school level.
Midlothian
Middle:
Current program capacity at Midlothian Middle is at ninety-two (92) percent. While the total potential
yield from this case could range up to thirty-four (34) to forty-one (41) middle school students at full build
out, the numbers of potential students generated on an annual basis will change incrementally while this
development is under construction. This school is forecasting to be at 76.8 percent of program capacity by
2028. The approved Capital Improvement Plan includes a renovation/replacement of the Midlothian
Middle facility that will provide additional capacity and the opportunity to balance enrollment at the
middle school level.
Midlothian
High:
Current program capacity at Midlothian High is at ninety-seven (97) percent. While the total potential
yield from this case could range up to fifty-one (51) to sixty-one (61) high school students at full build out,
the numbers of potential students generated on an annual basis will change incrementally while this
development is under construction. This school is forecasting to be at 102.2 percent of program capacity
by 2028. The approved Capital Improvement Plan includes the Western Area High School project that will
provide additional capacity and the opportunity to balance enrollment at the high school level.
Additional information on CCPS Mission and Capital Improvements can be found in the Appendix.
Page 157 of 295
North Hallsley 23SN0041 Page 16 of 39
In accordance with the Roseland Zoning Overlay District and Exhibit A, the property is anticipated to develop up to 340
single family lots/units. Based on those number of units and applying trip generation rates for a single-family detached
unit, development could generate approximately 3,100 average daily trips. The Comprehensive Plan, which includes the
Thoroughfare Plan, identifies county-wide transportation needs that are expected to mitigate traffic impacts of future
growth. The anticipated traffic impact of the proposal has been evaluated and recommendations are detailed in the
chart below. The traffic impact of this request will be addressed through cash payments and road improvements.
Recommendation Applicant’s
Proposal
Road Cash Proffer Policy:
An applicant may choose to address the development’s impacts on the county’s road transportation
network through dedication of property, construction of road improvements, or a cash proffer. In
accordance with the Policy, the traffic impact of the proposed development, located within Traffic
Shed 6, could be valued at $3,196,000 (340 single-family detached dwelling units x $9,400).
The applicant has proffered to construct off-site improvements along Old Hundred Road as noted in
the Road Improvement section below. Staff and the applicant agree that the estimated cost of the off-
site road improvement is $311,500. It should be noted, however, that the actual cost to provide these
improvements could be more or less than this amount. With staff supporting this reduction for the
off-site road improvement, the applicant has proffered to make payments of $8,484 for each primary
dwelling unit, which would total $2,884,560 (340 lots/units x $8,484). With the off-site road improvement
and the road cash proffer payments, the applicant will address the anticipated traffic impacts of the
development in accordance with the Policy.
In accordance with the Roseland Zoning Overlay District Section 19.1-395.F.a.ii., applicant may provide
other off-site road improvements identified in the Ordinance for additional road cash proffer payment
reduction. This can be determined after zoning approval.
Proffered
Condition 4
Transportation Contribution:
In accordance with the Roseland Zoning Overlay District Section 19.1-395.F.a., road improvements
are identified to mitigate the traffic impacts of the development. In addition to the road cash proffer
payment and road improvements, the applicant proffers to provide a transportation contribution
payment of $2,440 for each primary dwelling unit, which would total $829,600 (340 lots/units x
$2,440), to cover the development’s portion of the drainage/road crossing of Tomahawk Creek for the
East/West Major Arterial (“Roseland Avenue”). The payment is subject to cost adjustment as noted in
the Proffered Condition.
Proffered
Condition 4
Vehicular Access:
• Limited to one (1) access to Old Hundred Road.
• Vehicular access to Scottwood Road will be limited to emergency access only (gated), if required by the
Fire Department and as approved by the Fire and Transportation Departments.
• Connection to Alsdell Road-East (State Route 7448) and Dunleer Way (State Route 8384), state-
maintained stub outs. (As determined by VDOT, the property is required to connect to existing state-
maintained stub outs per VA State Code 24VAC30-92-S60 C-1.)
• Connection to Saville Chase Trail (State Route 8272), a state-maintained stub out. At the time of this
request, VDOT only supports Option B. (As determined by VDOT, the property is required to connect to
existing state-maintained stub outs per VA State Code 24VAC30-92-S60 C-1.)
Proffered
Condition 6
Transportation - County Department of Transportation
Page 158 of 295
North Hallsley 23SN0041 Page 17 of 39
Road Improvements - In conjunction with Old Hundred Road access or adjacent development to road:
• Construction of intersection control (roundabout, traffic signal, or alternative) at the Old Hundred Road
vehicular access.
• Left and right turn lanes along Old Hundred Road at the approved access. Turn lanes will not be required
if intersection control design will adequately accommodate turning movements (e.g., roundabout).
• Off-site: Widen/improve the west side of Old Hundred Road to provide a twelve (12) foot wide travel
lane, four (4) foot wide paved shoulder, four (4) foot wide unpaved shoulder, and overlaying the full
width of the road for the entire Property frontage (approximately 350 feet).
Road Improvement - In conjunction with Brightwalton Road access:
• Left and right turn lanes along Brightwalton Road at the approved access.
Proffered
Condition 7
Road Improvements and Phasing Plan (per Roseland Zoning Overlay District):
In conjunction with zoning application(s) for property within the District, a phasing plan shall be submitted
to and approved by the Transportation Department to address the required road improvements specified
in Section 19.1-395.F.a.i. to ensure an adequate road network. With the road cash proffer payment,
transportation contribution, and road improvements, the applicant has addressed the transportation and
phasing requirements of the District.
Proffered
Conditions 4,
6, 7, and
Zoning
Ordinance
Upcoming Road Projects:
Woolridge Road (Rt. 288 to Old Hundred Road) Extension: Revenue Sharing funds (fifty (50) percent state funds and
fifty (50) percent county funds) and CVTA funds will be used to construct an extension of Woolridge Road from Route
288 to Old Hundred Road. Right-of-way phase is underway with construction anticipated to begin in 2025.
Woolridge Road (Lacoc Road - Genito Road) Widening: Central Virginia Transportation Authority (CVTA) funds will be
used to improve the intersection of Woolridge Road and Watermill Parkway and widen Woolridge Road to a four-lane
roadway from Watermill Parkway to Genito Road. This will improve safety and support projected traffic volumes. A
second series of public information meetings were held in January 2023 to discuss the updated design elements. Right-
of-way is anticipated to begin this Summer with construction anticipated to begin in 2025.
Powhite Parkway Extension (Charter Colony Parkway – Woolridge Road), Phase A: Preliminary engineering is
underway to extend Powhite Parkway to Woolridge Road. Interchanges are proposed at Charter Colony Parkway and
Woolridge Road, with overpasses proposed at Brandermill Parkway and Watermill Parkway. A conceptual overview of
the corridor for the full extension of Powhite Parkway to Route 360 can be viewed at: Feeds • Powhite Parkway
Extension (chesterfield.gov)
Powhite Parkway (Woolridge Road – Route 360) Extension, Phase B: VDOT is conducting a NEPA (National
Environmental Policy Act) study for the Phase 2 portion of the Powhite Parkway Extension. The study will involve public
review and comment periods throughout 2024 and 2025.
The Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) has reviewed zoning Case 23SN0041 to rezone eight (8) parcels to R-
15 single-family residential. A review of the concept plan shows the construction of a roundabout leading to single-
family lots with multiple cul-de-sacs. The project also proposes stub connections to adjacent parcels as well as a
connection to Brightwalton Road along with cul-de-sac additions to existing sections of Hallsley (section 9).
Any improvements to public roads under VDOT maintenance shall be in accordance with the requirements of the VDOT
Road Design Manual for the functional classification and design speed of the road. All proposed sidewalks and/or
shared use paths proposed in VDOT right-of-way (ROW) shall be designed in accordance with VDOT standards. Any
Transportation - Virginia Department of Transportation
Page 159 of 295
North Hallsley 23SN0041 Page 18 of 39
proposed street trees within VDOT maintained ROW will need to comply with clear zone and landscaping requirements
detailed in Appendix A1 and Appendix B1 of the VDOT Road Design Manual. Any proposed access points that do not
meet the minimum spacing criteria for VDOT’s Access Management policy will require an Exception to be approved by
VDOT in order to permit and construct the access. During the plan review process, VDOT will require trip generations
and turn lane warrant analysis based on the proposed site improvements.
Continued coordination is recommended for any SSAR (Secondary Street Acceptance Requirements) exceptions and
roundabout design. A phasing plan should be provided prior to plan submission for review to ensure compliance with
SSAR requirements (compliance with connectivity requirements) for each phase of construction. Stubs for future
connections will need to comply with SSAR and VDOT Road Design Manual. All proposed subdivision streets to be state-
maintained must comply with all requirements of the 2011 SSAR Regulation, such as roadway width (with consideration
for on-street parking), pedestrian accommodations, public benefits, and connectivity requirements. The east cul-de-sac
of Alsdell Road appears to be an existing stub-out, as the plat for Hallsley – Section 25 shows a temporary turn-around
easement around the cul-de-sac; per the SSAR regulation, the proposed street network will need to tie into this existing
stub-out street. Per SSAR regulations, multiple connections in multiple directions shall be provided for the Seville Chase
Trail extension. This can be accomplished by connecting the extension to the northwest section. If this is not achievable
per reasons explicitly allowed in 24VAC30-92-60 C.2, then an exception will need to be submitted to the residency for
review.
Page 160 of 295
North Hallsley 23SN0041 Page 19 of 39
1. The request property is located within a mandatory water and wastewater connection area for new residential
development.
2. The applicant has provided proffers which address the impact of the proposed development on the public water
and wastewater systems, in accordance with the provisions of the “Roseland Overlay District”. Those proffers
include:
a. Use of the public water and wastewater systems.
b. Payment of a Utility Cash Proffer (UCP) payment for each equivalent residential unit (ERU) towards
public water storage and supply improvements needed for the public water system to address the
demands of the development.
c. Submittal of an Overall Water and Wastewater Plan for all acreage within the Roseland Overlay District,
which will identify a location for a 2-million-gallon water tank and be accompanied by a water and
wastewater system hydraulic analysis.
d. Responsibility for construction of any capacity-related improvements to the public water and
wastewater systems necessary to support the demands of the development.
e. Dedication of public water and wastewater easements, upon request by the County, in locations as
shown on the Overall Water and Wastewater Plan, and to provide access to properties outside the
development.
f. Design of the wastewater trunk sewer extension to minimize tree removal on the Property.
3. The Utilities Department supports this request.
Utilities – Water and Wastewater
Page 161 of 295
North Hallsley 23SN0041 Page 20 of 39
Community Meeting
8/22/2023 – Discussion Topics:
1. Street connections to existing subdivisions (Hallsley – Saville Chase Trail and Alsdell Road)
2. Design/size/price of homes in this development
3. Incorporation of this new development into Hallsley
4. Impact of new residential development on area roadways (including Scottwood Road), existing environmental
features, and wildlife
5. Concerns with construction traffic access
6. Potential impacts of this request on area schools
7. Proposed road improvements for Old Hundred Road
8. Location and connection points for the internal Main Line Trail
Planning Commission
6/18/2024: Citizen Comments: No citizens spoke to this request.
Recommendation: DEFERRED TO AUGUST 20, 2024 ON THE COMMISSION’S OWN MOTION WITHOUT
THE APPLICANT’S CONSENT.
Motion: Petroski Second: Sloan
AYES: Petroski, Sloan, Hardin, Hylton, Owens
8/20/2024: Citizen Comments: Six (6) citizens spoke to this request. Concerns relative to traffic on Old Hundred
Road, the proposed roundabout improvement on Old Hundred Road, access to Scottwood Road,
drainage concerns, location of a proposed wastewater line, and the future extension of Brightwalton
Road were expressed.
Commission Discussion: Mr. Petroski addressed questions and concerns relative to transportation
improvements (Brightwalton Road extension, Old Hundred Road improvements and timing, and the
proposed roundabout on Old Hundred Road) as well as the location of a proposed trunk wastewater
line. He also noted that the request will conform to the Roseland Overlay District requirements.
Recommendation: APPROVAL AND ACCEPTANCE OF THE PROFFERED CONDITIONS
Motion: Petroski Second: Sloan
AYES: Petroski, Sloan, Hardin, Hylton, Owens
Board of Supervisors
9/25/2024: Citizen Comments: One (1) citizen spoke to this request who supported the deferral. Concerns relative
to access and transportation improvements on Old Hundred Road were presented.
Recommendation: DEFERRED TO OCTOBER 30, 2024 ON THE BOARD’S OWN MOTION WITH THE
APPLICANT’S CONSENT.
Motion: Miller Second: Carroll
AYES: Holland, Miller, Carroll, Ingle, Schneider
Community Engagement & Public Hearings
Page 162 of 295
North Hallsley 23SN0041 Page 21 of 39
Staff Note: Both the Planning Commission and Staff recommend acceptance of Proffered Conditions 1-3, 5-
13, and 15-17 offered by the applicant. Staff recommends acceptance Proffered Conditions 4 and 14,
modified by the applicant on August 22, 2024.
The property owner and applicant in this case, Riverstone Properties, LLC, (the “Applicant”), pursuant to
Section 15.2-2298 of the Code of Virginia (1950, as amended) and the Zoning Ordinance of Chesterfield
County, for itself and its successors or assigns, proffers that the use of the properties known as Chesterfield
County Map ID Numbers 710-703-3345-00000, 709-701-7328-00000, 710-700-7596-00000, 711-700-1144-
00000, 711-699-3470-00000 (part of), 712-699-7663-00000, 711-701-5180-00000, and 709-700-8908-00000
(the “Property”) as a single family residential community will be developed according to the following
conditions if, and only if, the rezoning request submitted herewith is granted with only those conditions
agreed to by the Applicant. In the event this request is denied or approved with conditions not agreed to by
the Applicant, the proffers shall immediately be null and void and of no further force or effect.
1. Master Plan. The plan titled “North Hallsley Zoning Exhibit” dated March 20th, 2023 with revisions dated
June 19th, 2024, shall be considered the “Master Plan”. (P)
2. Conceptual Layout. The site shall be developed in general conformance with the layout depicted on the
Master Plan attached as Exhibit A. The layout on the Master Plan is conceptual in nature and may be
modified dependent on final engineering, environmental requirements, government requirements,
subdivision/lot layout, road layout, connecting roads, connecting road locations, open space, BMP
locations, amenity location at the time of Preliminary Plat, or as otherwise approved at the time of plans
review. (P)
3. Architectural/Design Elements. All Architectural/Design Elements below are considered minimum
standards for the Development of the Property.
a. Style and Form. The architectural styles shall be interpretations of traditional Richmond
architecture, using forms and elements compatible with those in Hallsley subdivision such as
Georgian, Classical Revival Colonial, Greek Revival, Queen Anne, Tudor, and Craftsman Styles.
b. Elevation Repetition. The same dwelling unit elevations shall not be located adjacent to or directly
across from each other along the same road. This concept does not apply to units on different
streets backing up to each other. Variation in the front elevation to address this restriction may not
be achieved by simply mirroring the façade but may be accomplished by providing at least three (3)
of the following architectural changes.
i. Adding or removing a porch or covered entry or increasing or decreasing the length of the
porch or entry.
ii. Varying the location and/or style of a front facing gable(s).
iii. Alternating the location of a garage.
iv. Providing different materials and/or siding types on at least fifty (50) percent of the
elevation.
v. Providing a different roof type/roof line.
vi. Providing a different architectural style.
Proffered Conditions (8/22/2024)
Page 163 of 295
North Hallsley 23SN0041 Page 22 of 39
c. Façade Materials. Acceptable siding materials include brick, stone, masonry, horizontal lap siding,
vertical siding, or a combination thereof. Siding shall be limited to cement fiber board only (such as
but not limited to HardiePlank). Vinyl siding shall be prohibited.
d. Foundation Materials. Foundations shall be brick or stone and shall extend a minimum of twenty-
four (24) inches above final grade, but in no event shall brick or stone be required to extend above
the bottom trim of the first-floor windows.
e. Roofs. Roof materials shall be standing seam metal or architectural dimensional shingles with algae
protection and having a minimum thirty (30) year warranty. Roofs or roof lines shall be varied in
color, height, or by a visual/material break between roofs.
f. Front Porches. All front entry stoops and front porches shall be constructed with a continuous
masonry foundation wall or on twelve (12) inch x twelve (12) inch masonry piers. Extended front
porches shall be a minimum of six (6) feet deep. Space between piers under porches shall be
enclosed (screened) with framed lattice, or vertical or horizontal panels. Handrails and railings shall
be finished painted wood or metal railing with vertical or horizontal pickets or sawn balusters.
Pickets and balusters shall have top and bottom rails that span between columns.
g. Front Porch Flooring. Porch flooring may be concrete, exposed aggregate concrete, or a finished
paving material such as stone, tile or brick, finished (stained) wood, or properly trimmed composite
decking boards. Unfinished treated wood decking is not permitted. All front steps shall be masonry
or stained/painted wood.
h. Front Walks. A minimum of a three (3) foot hardscaped front walk shall be provided to the front
entrance of each dwelling unit, to connect to drives, sidewalks, or street.
i. Garage Doors. Front loaded and corner side loaded garages shall use an upgraded garage door. An
upgraded garage door is any door with a minimum of three (3) enhanced features. Enhanced
features shall include windows, raised panels, decorative panels, arches, ornamental hardware or
other architectural features on the exterior that enhance the entry (e.g., decorative lintels, shed
roof overhangs, arches, columns, keystones, eyebrows, etc.) Flat panel garage doors are prohibited.
j. Direct Vent Fireplace. Direct vent gas fireplace boxes, which protrude beyond the exterior face of
the dwelling unit, are not permitted on front façades. All the exterior materials and finishes used to
enclose the fireplace box must match the adjacent façade. (P)
4. Road Cash Proffer, Transportation Contribution, and Utility Cash Proffer.
a. Road Cash Proffer. The Applicant, or assignee(s) shall pay $8,484.00 for each primary dwelling unit
(the “Road Cash Proffer”) to the County of Chesterfield for road improvements within the service
district for the property. Each payment shall be made prior to the issuance of a certificate of
occupancy for a dwelling unit, unless state law modifies the timing of payment. Should
Chesterfield County impose impact fees at any time during the life of the Development that are
applicable to the Property, the amount paid in cash proffers shall be in lieu of or credited toward,
but not in addition to, any impact fees, in a manner determined by the County. At the option of
Page 164 of 295
North Hallsley 23SN0041 Page 23 of 39
the Applicant, or assignee(s), the Road Cash Proffer payments may be reduced for the cost of off-
site road improvements, other than those improvements identified in the Road Improvement
Proffered Condition, as determined by the Transportation Department.
b. Transportation Contribution. A Transportation Contribution payment equal to $2,440.00 for each
primary dwelling unit shall be paid to the County of Chesterfield to cover the impact of the
development’s needed transportation/road improvements consistent with the Roseland Overlay
District requirements. Specifically, the Transportation Contribution is for the development’s portion
of drainage crossing of Tomahawk Creek for the East/West Major Arterial (“Roseland Avenue”).
Each payment shall be made prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy unless state law
modifies the timing of the payment.
The Transportation Contribution shall be adjusted annually on July 1st consistent with the Marshall
Valuation Services by CoreLogic, or its successor, to account for cost adjustments caused by various
economic factors. Specifically, the Comparative Cost Multiplier for the Building Class of Wood
Frame in the Southeast portion of the Eastern District shall be used. The January factor for the
current calendar year of April update shall be used to determine the factor that will be applied for
the next 12-month period. Adjustments will begin on July 1st following the approval of this request
by the Board of Supervisors until the Transportation Contribution payment is made.
Transportation Contributions shall be spent for the purposes proffered or as otherwise permitted
by law.
c. Utility Cash Proffer. In addition to connection fees and utility system extension costs as required by
the County Code, a Utility Cash Proffer (UCP) payment equal to $3,200.00 per equivalent
residential unit (ERU) shall be paid to the Utilities Department to cover the impact of the
development’s needed water storage and supply on the County’s public water system consistent
with the Roseland Overlay District requirements. Specifically, the UCP is for the development’s
portion of the overall cost of a two-million-gallon elevated water tank and approximately 7,300
linear feet of 16-inch waterline and a flow control valve along Old Hundred Road as programmed in
the Utilities Department’s Capital Improvement Project Program. Each payment shall be made
prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy unless state law modifies the timing of the
payment. For residential development, ERUs shall be consistent with the Utilities Department’s
application of Water Capital Cost Recovery Charges applied to new residential dwelling units per
County Code Chapter 18. Non-residential structures with water service shall pay a UCP to the
Utilities Department and shall be assessed one ERU for every 8,000 square foot of gross building
floor square footage or portion thereof. Each building floor will be counted separately and the
non-residential ERUs will be determined from the building permit application’s plan gross square
footage. Where buildings have multiple water service connections, there shall be a minimum UCP
of one ERU made for each individually served non-residential space under 8,000 square feet. The
Utility Cash Proffer payments as defined herein shall not apply to any residential, non-residential,
or common area/open space irrigation water services.
The UCP shall be adjusted annually on July 1st consistent with the Marshall Valuation Services by
CoreLogic, or its successor, to account for cost adjustments caused by various economic factors.
Specifically, the Comparative Cost Multiplier for the Building Class of Wood Frame in the Southeast
portion of the Eastern District shall be used. The January factor for the current calendar year of
Page 165 of 295
North Hallsley 23SN0041 Page 24 of 39
April update shall be used to determine the factor that will be applied for the next 12-month
period. Adjustments will begin on July 1st following the approval of this request by the Board of
Supervisors until the UCP payment is made. UCPs shall be spent for the purposes proffered or as
otherwise permitted by law. (B&M & U)
5. Utilities.
a. The proposed development will utilize public water and wastewater systems.
b. Overall Water and Wastewater Plan. An Overall Water and Wastewater Plan [Overall Plan] for all
acreage within the Roseland Overlay District shall be submitted to the Utilities Department prior to,
or in conjunction with the first tentative or preliminary plat and/or site or construction plan for the
request property. The Overall Plan shall include a recommended location of a minimum 2-acre site
for the placement of a 2-million-gallon elevated water tank acceptable to the Utilities Department.
A water and wastewater system hydraulic analysis will also be submitted with the Overall Plan to
determine water and wastewater infrastructure sizing, points of connection and interconnection,
and to verify the downstream sanitary sewer capacity. The Phased construction of the Overall Plan
improvements shall be allowed to meet the phased demands of the Property provided they will
meet the demands and needed fire flow of the proposed phased development of the Property.
c. Construction of any capacity-related improvements necessary for the public water and/or
wastewater systems to support the demands of the development shall be the responsibility of the
developer and included in the Overall Plan.
d. Following approval of the Overall Plan, upon request of the County, access to the property and
easements shall be provided, at no cost on standard County documents, in the location of
improvements shown on the Overall Plan, for the construction of public water and/or wastewater
lines independent of the timing of this development.
e. The developer shall design the on-site water and wastewater systems to provide water and
wastewater service to properties outside the development. The applicable utility lines and
easements shall be shown on the Overall Plan. Easements, water and wastewater extensions, or a
combination thereof shall be provided consistent with the Utilities Department’s standards and
policies in place at the time of the construction plan design.
f. The trunk wastewater line extension, as shown on Exhibit A, shall be designed to minimize tree
removal on the Property. Any existing trees within this area shall be preserved to the maximum
extent practical, unless otherwise approved by the Director of Utilities. (U)
6. Access.
a. Direct vehicular access from the property to Old Hundred Road shall be limited to one (1)
entrance/exit.
b. There shall be no direct vehicular access from the property to Scottwood Road, except for
emergency access only if required and as approved by the Fire Department and Transportation
Departments. (T)
Page 166 of 295
North Hallsley 23SN0041 Page 25 of 39
7. Road Improvements.
a. In conjunction with development of the property that includes access to Old Hundred Road or the
development of lots adjacent to Old Hundred Road, the following road improvements shall be
completed, as determined by the Transportation Department. The Transportation Department
shall approve the exact design, length, or other modifications of the improvements.
i. Construction/installation of intersection control (roundabout, traffic signal, or alternative
design) at the Old Hundred Road intersection, as approved by the Transportation
Department.
ii. Construction of additional pavement along Old Hundred Road at the approved public road
access to provide left and right turn lanes. If the intersection control design will adequately
address the turning movements (i.e. roundabout or alternative design), then turn lanes will
not be required, as determined by the Transportation Department.
iii. Off-Site: Widening/improving the west side of Old Hundred Road to a twelve (12) foot wide
travel lane, measured from the centerline of the existing pavement, with an additional four
(4) foot wide paved shoulder and overlaying the full width of the road with one and a half
(1.5) inch of compacted bituminous asphalt concrete, with any modifications approved by
the Transportation Department, for the property’s frontage (approximately 350 feet).
iv. Dedication to Chesterfield County, free and unrestricted, of any additional right of way
and/or easements required for the improvements identified above.
b. In conjunction with development of the property that includes access to Brightwalton Road,
construction of additional pavement along Brightwalton Road at the approved public road access
to provide left and right turn lanes shall be completed, as determined by the Transportation
Department, and dedication to Chesterfield County, free and unrestricted, of any additional right
of way and/or easements required for the improvement. The Transportation Department shall
approve the exact design and length of the improvements. (T)
8. Amenity. Recreational neighborhood area shall be located on the Property as generally illustrated on
Exhibit A and shall include an open or enclosed structure with a pool, and at least one (1) of the following
recreational amenities: sport court, play area, fire pit, outdoor game area, walking trails, sitting area, or
other similar improvements. Construction of the recreational neighborhood area shall commence prior
to the issuance of the 62nd building permit for a dwelling unit. Other recreational neighborhood facilities
and uses accessory to residential uses may be located elsewhere on the Property. The recreational
neighborhood area shown on Exhibit A shall prohibit the construction of any buildings, vehicle parking, or
hardscape areas within a designated FEMA floodplain. The term “hardscape areas” shall not prohibit
construction of neighborhood trails, pathway improvements, and/or retaining walls, if approved by
Environmental Engineering. (P & EE)
9. Steep Slopes. Steep slopes equal to or greater than twenty (20) percent shall remain in their natural,
undisturbed state to the maximum extent practicable, unless otherwise approved by the Department of
Environmental Engineering. In locations where the disturbance of slopes greater than twenty (20)
percent is unavoidable, enhanced erosion and sediment control measures, such as super silt fence (or
alternative as approved by the Department of Environmental Engineering) and the application of anionic
Page 167 of 295
North Hallsley 23SN0041 Page 26 of 39
PAM to denuded areas during construction and final stabilization, will be provided as directed by the
Department of Environmental Engineering at the time of site plan review. The Department of
Environmental Engineering shall approve the exact design and implementation of these standards. (EE)
10. Flood Plain. Post Development Discharge Rates, the maximum post-development discharge rate for the
100- year storm shall be based on the maximum capacity of the existing facilities downstream, and the
recorded 100-year backwater and/or floodplain shall not be increased. On-site detention of the post-
development 100-year discharge rate to below the pre-development 100-year discharge rate may be
provided to satisfy this requirement. (EE)
11. Upper Swift Creek Watershed. During construction of the development, Applicant shall endeavor to
minimize the impacts of the Upper Swift Creek Watershed with the use of the following enhanced erosion
and sediment control measures, and such other measures as may otherwise be approved by the Director
of Environmental Engineering at the time of plans review:
a. Super Silt Fence, or an alternative as approved by the Department of Environmental Engineering,
shall be provided as a perimeter control in locations where standard silt fence would have been
required;
b. Sediment traps and basins sized at least twenty five percent (25%) larger than the minimum
Virginia Erosion Control Handbook’s standard shall be provided; and
c. Anionic PAM, Flexible Growth Medium and/or a County-approved equivalent shall be applied to
denuded areas during construction and at final stabilization in the locations shown on plans
approved by Environmental Engineering at the time of plans review. (EE)
12. Geotechnical Report. A geotechnical engineering report prepared by a consultant who has had previous
mining/geotechnical experience in reclamation of mine shafts shall be submitted to the Environmental
Engineering Department prior to or in conjunction with any subdivision submission. Upon review by
Environmental Engineering, or its designee, the report may either be accepted, or revisions requested
and, if revisions are requested, the report shall be resubmitted in the same manner for review and
acceptance by Environmental Engineering, or its designee. The report shall include, but not be limited to
the following:
a. The location and analysis to include, but not be limited to, type (e.g. mine entrance shaft, air
vents, unsuccessful exploratory pits, etc.), size and depth of any mining pits or tailing heaps;
b. Fill-in/reclamation procedures; setback between the perimeter of any shaft; and any other
measures intended to protect the health, safety, and welfare of people and structures.
c. The impact of any horizontal shafts on construction and future health, safety and welfare issues;
d. The location and number of soil borings and depth necessary to confirm that building sites are not
impacted by any horizontal shafts; and
e. The allowable building envelopes and location based on the geotechnical recommendations.
All development on the Property shall comply with the recommendations of the accepted report.
Page 168 of 295
North Hallsley 23SN0041 Page 27 of 39
Prior to final subdivision approval, the developer shall submit to Environmental Engineering
evidence of compliance with the recommendation of the geotechnical report. (EE)
13. Subdivision Phasing. Construction plan approval for any future subdivision section with access to either (i)
Saville Chase Trail and/or (ii) adjoining GPIN 708-700-4546 shall not be granted before January 1, 2031.
(P)
14. Construction Access & Signage for the Saville Chase Trail Extension.
a. There shall be no construction vehicular access to/from existing Saville Chase Trail until the
road and infrastructure construction activity is complete, as determined by the Planning
Department. No construction vehicular access for the construction of future dwellings shall be
permitted if a through road design is selected. Nothing herein shall preclude vehicular
construction access from Saville Chase Trail for the construction of future dwellings on the
Property if the extended cul-de-sac design is provided.
b. Prior to any land disturbance on the property, temporary barricade(s) and sign(s) shall be
installed by the Owner/Developer at the Saville Chase Trail stub-out terminus at the Property
line to deter and prevent construction traffic, as defined in 14.a., from using the stub-
out. Sign(s) shall be posted in English and Spanish that is clearly legible from the public right of
way. Sign(s) shall be maintained by the Owner/Developer and shall remain until road and
infrastructure construction activity is complete, as determined by the Planning
Department. The temporary barricade(s) shall remain in place until removal of the barrier is
required by VDOT or the Transportation Department for public street acceptance. (P)
15. Waiver Request for Saville Chase Trail Extension. Prior to preliminary plat or construction plan approval for
that portion of the Property adjacent to the Saville Chase Trail, whichever comes first, the Developer shall
submit a request to VDOT for a waiver to allow the extended cul-de-sac design shown on Exhibit A. If this
waiver is granted, the Developer shall provide the extended cul-de-sac design. (P and T)
16. Vacation of Temporary Turnaround for Saville Chase Trail. Upon vacation of the temporary turnaround
easement for Saville Chase Trail in Hallsley, Section 25, the existing improvements within the vacated
easement area shall be graded and restored with equal or better lawn/sod, irrigation,
stormwater/dwelling underdrains, and driveway materials. (P)
17. Drainage for Individual Dwellings. A certification for individual dwellings shall be provided before the
issuance of a certificate of occupancy that certifies there is positive drainage away from the foundation,
and that grading on the lot and drainage infrastructure conforms to the approved plans. (EE)
Page 169 of 295
North Hallsley 23SN0041 Page 28 of 39
Staff Note: Both the Planning Commission and Staff recommend acceptance of Proffered Conditions 1-3, 5-
13, and 15-17 offered by the applicant. Staff recommends acceptance Proffered Conditions 4 and 14,
modified by the applicant on August 22, 2024.
The property owner and applicant in this case, Riverstone Properties, LLC, (the “Applicant”), pursuant to
Section 15.2-2298 of the Code of Virginia (1950, as amended) and the Zoning Ordinance of Chesterfield
County, for itself and its successors or assigns, proffers that the use of the properties known as Chesterfield
County Map ID Numbers 710-703-3345-00000, 709-701-7328-00000, 710-700-7596-00000, 711-700-1144-
00000, 711-699-3470-00000 (part of), 712-699-7663-00000, 711-701-5180-00000, and 709-700-8908-00000
(the “Property”) as a single family residential community will be developed according to the following
conditions if, and only if, the rezoning request submitted herewith is granted with only those conditions
agreed to by the Applicant. In the event this request is denied or approved with conditions not agreed to by
the Applicant, the proffers shall immediately be null and void and of no further force or effect.
1. Master Plan. The plan titled “North Hallsley Zoning Exhibit” dated March 20th, 2023 with revisions dated
June 19th, 2024, shall be considered the “Master Plan”. (P)
2. Conceptual Layout. The site shall be developed in general conformance with the layout depicted on the
Master Plan attached as Exhibit A. The layout on the Master Plan is conceptual in nature and may be
modified dependent on final engineering, environmental requirements, government requirements,
subdivision/lot layout, road layout, connecting roads, connecting road locations, open space, BMP
locations, amenity location at the time of Preliminary Plat, or as otherwise approved at the time of plans
review. (P)
3. Architectural/Design Elements. All Architectural/Design Elements below are considered minimum
standards for the Development of the Property.
a. Style and Form. The architectural styles shall be interpretations of traditional Richmond
architecture, using forms and elements compatible with those in Hallsley subdivision such as
Georgian, Classical Revival Colonial, Greek Revival, Queen Anne, Tudor, and Craftsman Styles.
b. Elevation Repetition. The same dwelling unit elevations shall not be located adjacent to or directly
across from each other along the same road. This concept does not apply to units on different
streets backing up to each other. Variation in the front elevation to address this restriction may not
be achieved by simply mirroring the façade but may be accomplished by providing at least three (3)
of the following architectural changes.
i. Adding or removing a porch or covered entry or increasing or decreasing the length of the
porch or entry.
ii. Varying the location and/or style of a front facing gable(s).
iii. Alternating the location of a garage.
iv. Providing different materials and/or siding types on at least fifty (50) percent of the
elevation.
v. Providing a different roof type/roof line.
vi. Providing a different architectural style.
Proffered Conditions (8/22/2024) - Redlined
Page 170 of 295
North Hallsley 23SN0041 Page 29 of 39
c. Façade Materials. Acceptable siding materials include brick, stone, masonry, horizontal lap siding,
vertical siding, or a combination thereof. Siding shall be limited to cement fiber board only (such as
but not limited to HardiePlank). Vinyl siding shall be prohibited.
d. Foundation Materials. Foundations shall be brick or stone and shall extend a minimum of twenty-
four (24) inches above final grade, but in no event shall brick or stone be required to extend above
the bottom trim of the first-floor windows.
e. Roofs. Roof materials shall be standing seam metal or architectural dimensional shingles with algae
protection and having a minimum thirty (30) year warranty. Roofs or roof lines shall be varied in
color, height, or by a visual/material break between roofs.
f. Front Porches. All front entry stoops and front porches shall be constructed with a continuous
masonry foundation wall or on twelve (12) inch x twelve (12) inch masonry piers. Extended front
porches shall be a minimum of six (6) feet deep. Space between piers under porches shall be
enclosed (screened) with framed lattice, or vertical or horizontal panels. Handrails and railings shall
be finished painted wood or metal railing with vertical or horizontal pickets or sawn balusters.
Pickets and balusters shall have top and bottom rails that span between columns.
g. Front Porch Flooring. Porch flooring may be concrete, exposed aggregate concrete, or a finished
paving material such as stone, tile or brick, finished (stained) wood, or properly trimmed composite
decking boards. Unfinished treated wood decking is not permitted. All front steps shall be masonry
or stained/painted wood.
h. Front Walks. A minimum of a three (3) foot hardscaped front walk shall be provided to the front
entrance of each dwelling unit, to connect to drives, sidewalks, or street.
i. Garage Doors. Front loaded and corner side loaded garages shall use an upgraded garage door. An
upgraded garage door is any door with a minimum of three (3) enhanced features. Enhanced
features shall include windows, raised panels, decorative panels, arches, ornamental hardware or
other architectural features on the exterior that enhance the entry (e.g., decorative lintels, shed
roof overhangs, arches, columns, keystones, eyebrows, etc.) Flat panel garage doors are prohibited.
j. Direct Vent Fireplace. Direct vent gas fireplace boxes, which protrude beyond the exterior face of
the dwelling unit, are not permitted on front façades. All the exterior materials and finishes used to
enclose the fireplace box must match the adjacent façade. (P)
4. Road Cash Proffer, Transportation Contribution, and Utility Cash Proffer.
a. Road Cash Proffer. The Applicant, or assignee(s) shall pay $8,484.00 for each primary dwelling unit
(the “Road Cash Proffer”) to the County of Chesterfield for road improvements within the service
district for the property. Each payment shall be made prior to the issuance of a certificate of
occupancy for a dwelling unit, unless state law modifies the timing of payment. Should
Chesterfield County impose impact fees at any time during the life of the Development that are
applicable to the Property, the amount paid in cash proffers shall be in lieu of or credited toward,
but not in addition to, any impact fees, in a manner determined by the County. At the option of
Page 171 of 295
North Hallsley 23SN0041 Page 30 of 39
the Applicant, or assignee(s), the Road Cash Proffer payments may be reduced for the cost of off-
site road improvements, other than those improvements identified in the Road Improvement
Proffered Condition, as determined by the Transportation Department.
b. Transportation Contribution. A Transportation Contribution payment equal to $2,440.00 for each
primary dwelling unit shall be paid to the County of Chesterfield to cover the impact of the
development’s needed transportation/road improvements consistent with the Roseland Overlay
District requirements. Specifically, the Transportation Contribution is for the development’s portion
of drainage crossing of Tomahawk Creek for the East/West Major Arterial (“Roseland Avenue”).
Each payment shall be made prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy unless state law
modifies the timing of the payment.
The Transportation Contribution shall be adjusted annually on July 1st consistent with the Marshall
Valuation Services by CoreLogic, or its successor, to account for cost adjustments caused by various
economic factors. Specifically, the Comparative Cost Multiplier for the Building Class of Wood
Frame in the Southeast portion of the Eastern District shall be used. The January factor for the
current calendar year of April update shall be used to determine the factor that will be applied for
the next 12-month period. Adjustments will begin on July 1st following the approval of this request
by the Board of Supervisors until the Transportation Contribution payment is made.
Transportation Contributions shall be spent for the purposes proffered or as otherwise permitted
by law.
c. Utility Cash Proffer. In addition to connection fees and utility system extension costs as required by
the County Code, a Utility Cash Proffer (UCP) payment equal to $3,200.00 per equivalent
residential unit (ERU) shall be paid to the Utilities Department to cover the impact of the
development’s needed water storage and supply on the County’s public water system consistent
with the Roseland Overlay District requirements. Specifically, the UCP is for the development’s
portion of the overall cost of a two-million-gallon elevated water tank and approximately 7,300
linear feet of 16-inch waterline and a flow control valve along Old Hundred Road as programmed in
the Utilities Department’s Capital Improvement Project Program. Each payment shall be made
prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy unless state law modifies the timing of the
payment. For residential development, ERUs shall be consistent with the Utilities Department’s
application of Water Capital Cost Recovery Charges applied to new residential dwelling units per
County Code Chapter 18. Non-residential structures with water service shall pay a UCP to the
Utilities Department and shall be assessed one ERU for every 8,000 square foot of gross building
floor square footage or portion thereof. Each building floor will be counted separately and the
non-residential ERUs will be determined from the building permit application’s plan gross square
footage. Where buildings have multiple water service connections, there shall be a minimum UCP
of one ERU made for each individually served non-residential space under 8,000 square feet. The
Utility Cash Proffer payments as defined herein shall not apply to any residential, non-residential,
or common area/open space irrigation water services.
The UCP shall be adjusted annually on July 1st consistent with the Marshall Valuation Services by
CoreLogic, or its successor, to account for cost adjustments caused by various economic factors.
Specifically, the Comparative Cost Multiplier for the Building Class of Wood Frame in the Southeast
portion of the Eastern District shall be used. The January factor for the current calendar year of
Page 172 of 295
North Hallsley 23SN0041 Page 31 of 39
April update shall be used to determine the factor that will be applied for the next 12-month
period. Adjustments will begin on July 1st following the approval of this request by the Board of
Supervisors until the UCP payment is made. UCPs shall be spent for the purposes proffered or as
otherwise permitted by law. (B&M & U)
5. Utilities.
a. The proposed development will utilize public water and wastewater systems.
b. Overall Water and Wastewater Plan. An Overall Water and Wastewater Plan [Overall Plan] for all
acreage within the Roseland Overlay District shall be submitted to the Utilities Department prior to,
or in conjunction with the first tentative or preliminary plat and/or site or construction plan for the
request property. The Overall Plan shall include a recommended location of a minimum 2-acre site
for the placement of a 2-million-gallon elevated water tank acceptable to the Utilities Department.
A water and wastewater system hydraulic analysis will also be submitted with the Overall Plan to
determine water and wastewater infrastructure sizing, points of connection and interconnection,
and to verify the downstream sanitary sewer capacity. The Phased construction of the Overall Plan
improvements shall be allowed to meet the phased demands of the Property provided they will
meet the demands and needed fire flow of the proposed phased development of the Property.
c. Construction of any capacity-related improvements necessary for the public water and/or
wastewater systems to support the demands of the development shall be the responsibility of the
developer and included in the Overall Plan.
d. Following approval of the Overall Plan, upon request of the County, access to the property and
easements shall be provided, at no cost on standard County documents, in the location of
improvements shown on the Overall Plan, for the construction of public water and/or wastewater
lines independent of the timing of this development.
e. The developer shall design the on-site water and wastewater systems to provide water and
wastewater service to properties outside the development. The applicable utility lines and
easements shall be shown on the Overall Plan. Easements, water and wastewater extensions, or a
combination thereof shall be provided consistent with the Utilities Department’s standards and
policies in place at the time of the construction plan design.
f. The trunk wastewater line extension, as shown on Exhibit A, shall be designed to minimize tree
removal on the Property. Any existing trees within this area shall be preserved to the maximum
extent practical, unless otherwise approved by the Director of Utilities. (U)
6. Access.
b. Direct vehicular access from the property to Old Hundred Road shall be limited to one (1)
entrance/exit.
b. There shall be no direct vehicular access from the property to Scottwood Road, except for
emergency access only if required and as approved by the Fire Department and Transportation
Departments. (T)
Page 173 of 295
North Hallsley 23SN0041 Page 32 of 39
7. Road Improvements.
a. In conjunction with development of the property that includes access to Old Hundred Road or the
development of lots adjacent to Old Hundred Road, the following road improvements shall be
completed, as determined by the Transportation Department. The Transportation Department
shall approve the exact design, length, or other modifications of the improvements.
i. Construction/installation of intersection control (roundabout, traffic signal, or alternative
design) at the Old Hundred Road intersection, as approved by the Transportation
Department.
ii. Construction of additional pavement along Old Hundred Road at the approved public road
access to provide left and right turn lanes. If the intersection control design will adequately
address the turning movements (i.e. roundabout or alternative design), then turn lanes will
not be required, as determined by the Transportation Department.
iii. Off-Site: Widening/improving the west side of Old Hundred Road to a twelve (12) foot wide
travel lane, measured from the centerline of the existing pavement, with an additional four
(4) foot wide paved shoulder and overlaying the full width of the road with one and a half
(1.5) inch of compacted bituminous asphalt concrete, with any modifications approved by
the Transportation Department, for the property’s frontage (approximately 350 feet).
iv. Dedication to Chesterfield County, free and unrestricted, of any additional right of way
and/or easements required for the improvements identified above.
b. In conjunction with development of the property that includes access to Brightwalton Road,
construction of additional pavement along Brightwalton Road at the approved public road access
to provide left and right turn lanes shall be completed, as determined by the Transportation
Department, and dedication to Chesterfield County, free and unrestricted, of any additional right
of way and/or easements required for the improvement. The Transportation Department shall
approve the exact design and length of the improvements. (T)
8. Amenity. Recreational neighborhood area shall be located on the Property as generally illustrated on
Exhibit A and shall include an open or enclosed structure with a pool, and at least one (1) of the following
recreational amenities: sport court, play area, fire pit, outdoor game area, walking trails, sitting area, or
other similar improvements. Construction of the recreational neighborhood area shall commence prior
to the issuance of the 62nd building permit for a dwelling unit. Other recreational neighborhood facilities
and uses accessory to residential uses may be located elsewhere on the Property. The recreational
neighborhood area shown on Exhibit A shall prohibit the construction of any buildings, vehicle parking, or
hardscape areas within a designated FEMA floodplain. The term “hardscape areas” shall not prohibit
construction of neighborhood trails, pathway improvements, and/or retaining walls, if approved by
Environmental Engineering. (P & EE)
9. Steep Slopes. Steep slopes equal to or greater than twenty (20) percent shall remain in their natural,
undisturbed state to the maximum extent practicable, unless otherwise approved by the Department of
Environmental Engineering. In locations where the disturbance of slopes greater than twenty (20)
percent is unavoidable, enhanced erosion and sediment control measures, such as super silt fence (or
alternative as approved by the Department of Environmental Engineering) and the application of anionic
Page 174 of 295
North Hallsley 23SN0041 Page 33 of 39
PAM to denuded areas during construction and final stabilization, will be provided as directed by the
Department of Environmental Engineering at the time of site plan review. The Department of
Environmental Engineering shall approve the exact design and implementation of these standards. (EE)
10. Flood Plain. Post Development Discharge Rates, the maximum post-development discharge rate for the
100- year storm shall be based on the maximum capacity of the existing facilities downstream, and the
recorded 100-year backwater and/or floodplain shall not be increased. On-site detention of the post-
development 100-year discharge rate to below the pre-development 100-year discharge rate may be
provided to satisfy this requirement. (EE)
11. Upper Swift Creek Watershed. During construction of the development, Applicant shall endeavor to
minimize the impacts of the Upper Swift Creek Watershed with the use of the following enhanced erosion
and sediment control measures, and such other measures as may otherwise be approved by the Director
of Environmental Engineering at the time of plans review:
a. Super Silt Fence, or an alternative as approved by the Department of Environmental Engineering,
shall be provided as a perimeter control in locations where standard silt fence would have been
required;
b. Sediment traps and basins sized at least twenty five percent (25%) larger than the minimum
Virginia Erosion Control Handbook’s standard shall be provided; and
c. Anionic PAM, Flexible Growth Medium and/or a County-approved equivalent shall be applied to
denuded areas during construction and at final stabilization in the locations shown on plans
approved by Environmental Engineering at the time of plans review. (EE)
12. Geotechnical Report. A geotechnical engineering report prepared by a consultant who has had previous
mining/geotechnical experience in reclamation of mine shafts shall be submitted to the Environmental
Engineering Department prior to or in conjunction with any subdivision submission. Upon review by
Environmental Engineering, or its designee, the report may either be accepted, or revisions requested
and, if revisions are requested, the report shall be resubmitted in the same manner for review and
acceptance by Environmental Engineering, or its designee. The report shall include, but not be limited to
the following:
a. The location and analysis to include, but not be limited to, type (e.g. mine entrance shaft, air
vents, unsuccessful exploratory pits, etc.), size and depth of any mining pits or tailing heaps;
b. Fill-in/reclamation procedures; setback between the perimeter of any shaft; and any other
measures intended to protect the health, safety, and welfare of people and structures.
c. The impact of any horizontal shafts on construction and future health, safety and welfare issues;
d. The location and number of soil borings and depth necessary to confirm that building sites are not
impacted by any horizontal shafts; and
e. The allowable building envelopes and location based on the geotechnical recommendations.
All development on the Property shall comply with the recommendations of the accepted report.
Page 175 of 295
North Hallsley 23SN0041 Page 34 of 39
Prior to final subdivision approval, the developer shall submit to Environmental Engineering
evidence of compliance with the recommendation of the geotechnical report. (EE)
13. Subdivision Phasing. Construction plan approval for any future subdivision section with access to either (i)
Saville Chase Trail and/or (ii) adjoining GPIN 708-700-4546 shall not be granted before January 1, 2031.
(P)
14. Construction Access & Signage for the Saville Chase Trail Extension.
a. There shall be no construction vehicular access to/from existing Saville Chase Trail until the
road and infrastructure construction activity is complete, as determined by the Planning
Department. No construction vehicular access for the construction of future dwellings shall be
permitted if a through road design is selected. Nothing herein shall preclude vehicular
construction access from Saville Chase Trail for the construction of future dwellings on the
Property if the extended cul-de-sac design is provided.
b. Prior to any land disturbance on the property, temporary barricade(s) and sign(s) shall be
installed by the Owner/Developer at the Saville Chase Trail stub-out terminus at the Property
line to deter and prevent construction traffic, as defined in 15.a. 14.a., from using the stub-
out. Sign(s) shall be posted in English and Spanish that is clearly legible from the public right of
way. Sign(s) shall be maintained by the Owner/Developer and shall remain until road and
infrastructure construction activity is complete, as determined by the Planning
Department. The temporary barricade(s) shall remain in place until removal of the barrier is
required by VDOT or the Transportation Department for public street acceptance. (P)
15. Waiver Request for Saville Chase Trail Extension. Prior to preliminary plat or construction plan approval for
that portion of the Property adjacent to the Saville Chase Trail, whichever comes first, the Developer shall
submit a request to VDOT for a waiver to allow the extended cul-de-sac design shown on Exhibit A. If this
waiver is granted, the Developer shall provide the extended cul-de-sac design. (P and T)
16. Vacation of Temporary Turnaround for Saville Chase Trail. Upon vacation of the temporary turnaround
easement for Saville Chase Trail in Hallsley, Section 25, the existing improvements within the vacated
easement area shall be graded and restored with equal or better lawn/sod, irrigation,
stormwater/dwelling underdrains, and driveway materials. (P)
17. Drainage for Individual Dwellings. A certification for individual dwellings shall be provided before the
issuance of a certificate of occupancy that certifies there is positive drainage away from the foundation,
and that grading on the lot and drainage infrastructure conforms to the approved plans. (EE)
Page 176 of 295
North Hallsley 23SN0041 Page 35 of 39
Conceptual Plan – Exhibit A
Page 177 of 295
North Hallsley 23SN0041 Page 36 of 39
Applicant
• Applicant’s Contact:
John Hauserman (804-643-4200)
jhauserman@riverg.com
District Planning Commissioner
• Frank Petroski (804-768-7558)
petroskif@chesterfield.gov
Staff
• Planning Department Case Manager: Ryan Ramsey (804-751-4474) ramseyrp@chesterfield.gov
• Budget & Management: David Oakley (804-706-2586) oakleyd@chesterfield.gov
• Community Enhancement: Ted Barclay (804-748-1802) barclayt@chesterfield.gov
• Environmental Engineering: Scott Dunn (804-748-1030) dunns@chesterfield.gov
• Fire & Emergency Medical Services: Anthony Batten (804-717-6167) battena@chesterfield.gov
• Libraries: Jennifer Stevens (804-751-4998) stevensj@chesterfield.gov
• Parks & Recreation: Stuart Connock (804-751-4484) connocks@chesterfield.gov
• Police: Jim Eicher (804-318-8693) eicherj@chesterfield.gov
• Schools: David Oakley (804-706-2586) oakleyd@chesterfield.gov
• Transportation - County Department of Transportation: Steve Adams (804-751-4461)
adamsst@chesterfield.gov
• Transportation - Virginia Department of Transportation: Dustin Dunnagan (804-674-2384)
dustin.dunnagan@vdot.virginia.gov
• Utilities: John Melis (804-751-4778) melisj@chesterfield.gov
Case Contacts
Page 178 of 295
North Hallsley 23SN0041 Page 37 of 39
County finance staff is responsible for managing the finances of the County and making recommendations to the County
Administrator regarding the allocation of available resources for the provision of services and capital facilities to serve
the citizens of the County. Finance staff will advise the County Administrator if changed economic circumstances require
adjustments to the County’s budget or capital improvement program.
Review the StratIS Dashboard for additional information regarding the following topics:
• Demand Indicators Report. Highlight of key community indicators and planning for future capital facilities.
• Chesterfield County School Enrollment and Capacity Report. Current and past student enrollment information.
Mission & Service Profile
The mission of Chesterfield Fire and Emergency Medical Services (CFEMS) is to protect life, property and the environment.
This requires a comprehensive portfolio of services aimed at preventing fires, mitigating the impact of fires and disasters
on the community, and providing a timely and effective response when fires, medical and other emergencies occur.
Community risks, population growth and demographic changes, service demands, and response times are reviewed
annually and the need for additional Fire & EMS operating and capital resources in support of the department’s mission
is evaluated during the county’s annual budget and 5-year Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) processes.
Community Fire Protection Capabilities Assessment
Chesterfield Fire and EMS participates in the Insurance Services Office (ISO) Public Protection Classification (PPC) program,
which rates a community’s fire protection capabilities in accordance with the Fire Suppression Rating Schedule (FSRS).
Using the FSRS, the ISO performs a comprehensive evaluation of a community’s fire department, water supply, emergency
communications and community risk reduction efforts. The resulting score establishes a PPC rating from 1 to 10, with
Class 1 being the best possible rating. Many insurance carriers reference a community’s PPC rating in establishing
insurance premiums. Generally, communities with a Class 1 rating enjoy lower insurance premiums than those
communities with a Class 10 rating. Chesterfield County has a current community classification of 2/2Y, however some
portions are classified as 10 or 10W based on the parameters indicated below.
Class 2 - within 5 miles of a fire station and within 1,000 feet of a fire hydrant.
Class 2Y – within 5 miles of a fire station but not within 1,000 feet of a fire hydrant.
Class 10W – within 5-7 miles of a fire station and within 1,000 feet of a fire hydrant.
Class 10 – outside of 5 miles of a fire station and not within 1,000 feet of a fire hydrant.
Appendix
Budget & Management
Community Facilities and Infrastructure
Fire & Emergency Medical Services
Page 179 of 295
North Hallsley 23SN0041 Page 38 of 39
Response Time Goals (Urban/Rural Zones)
Urban Zone
Fire and EMS response goal is 7 minutes from receipt of call in the Emergency Communications Center (ECC) to
arrival of first responding unit. Fire and EMS facilities should be strategically located to provide 4 minutes or less
travel time for the first arriving engine company at a suppression incident, and 8 minutes or less travel time for
deployment of an Effective Firefighting Force (first alarm assignment) at a suppression incident.
Rural Zone
Fire and EMS response goal is 12 minutes from receipt of call in the Emergency Communications Center (ECC) to arrival of
first responding unit. Fire and EMS facilities should be strategically located to provide 9 minutes or less travel time for the
first arriving engine company at a suppression incident, and 13 minutes or less travel time for deployment of an Effective
Firefighting Force (first alarm assignment) at a suppression incident.
Page 180 of 295
North Hallsley 23SN0041 Page 39 of 39
Mission
High performing, high quality public schools contribute to the quality of life and economic vitality of the County. The
comprehensive plan suggests a greater focus should be placed on linking schools with communities by providing greater
access, flexible designs and locations that better meet the needs of the communities in which they are located.
Capital Improvements
The School Board FY2025 approved five-year Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) continues to support the 2022 voter
approved bond referendum. The approved CIP will replace or renovate seven schools and construct five new schools to
add an additional capacity of approximately 8,500 seats countywide. The existing facilities that are part of the
replacement and renovation program are A.M. Davis Elementary, Bensley Elementary, Grange Hall Elementary, Falling
Creek Middle School, Matoaca Middle, Midlothian Middle, and Thomas Dale High. The five new schools include a
Western Area Middle School and Elementary School near Westerleigh Parkway which will open in 2025 and 2026,
respectively. A Western Area High School will also open in 2027 near Duval Road. A new Dale District and an Old
Hundred Area Elementary School are also scheduled to open in 2027, with sites to be determined. Information on the
CIP and School Board approved construction projects can be found in the financial section of the CCPS Approved Budget
for FY2025 or the County CIP Dashboard.
Schools
Page 181 of 295
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Meeting Date: October 30, 2024 Item Number: 17.C.1.
Subject:
24SN1125 - Olson Home Based Surveying Firm - Dale
Board Action Requested:
Summary of Information:
Attachments:
1. 24SN1125 - Disclosure
2. 24SN1125-2024OCT30-BOS-RPT
3. 24SN1125-PP
Preparer:
Approved By:
Page 182 of 295
P
a
g
e
1
8
3
o
f
2
9
5
P
a
g
e
1
8
4
o
f
2
9
5
Olson Home Based Surveying Firm 24SN1125 Page 1 of 10
24SN1125 – Olson Home Based
Surveying Firm
Magisterial District – Dale
Applicant – Randy and Jo Olson (804-691-1487)
BOS Public Hearing – October 30, 2024
Time Remaining
12 Months
Case Manager
Haley Gist
(804-748-1071)
Request
Conditional Use
Operation of a land surveying office from the home is
planned.
Planning Commission Recommendation
Approval
Staff Recommendation
Approval
The Property
4257 Inca Drive
Site Size
0.35 Acres
Comprehensive Plan –
Land Use Designation
Suburban Residential II
Plan Area
County Wide Plan
Figure 1: Aerial of Request Area – Click Image for Link to GIS
Figure 2: Area Map of Request & Land Use Plan Map
Conditional use to permit a business (land surveying office) incidental to a dwelling in a Residential (R-7) District.
The applicants currently reside within the existing dwelling on the property and propose to operate a land surveying
office from the home.
Summary of Proposal
Page 185 of 295
Olson Home Based Surveying Firm 24SN1125 Page 2 of 10
PLANNING COMMISSION – APPROVAL
STAFF - APPROVAL
As conditioned, staff finds the use will have minimal impact on adjacent properties and residential character of the area
will be maintained should this request be granted. As such, staff recommends approval of this request.
NOTES FOR THE PLANNING COMMISSION AND BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
1. Conditions may be imposed.
2. Conditions have been identified in this report.
3. Both Planning Commission and Staff recommend the conditions identified in this report.
Recommendations
Page 186 of 295
Olson Home Based Surveying Firm 24SN1125 Page 3 of 10
Summary of Proposal .............................................................................................................................................................. 1
Recommendations .................................................................................................................................................................. 2
Updates to the Zoning Request since the September Planning Commission Hearing ............ Error! Bookmark not defined.
Table of Contents .................................................................................................................................................................... 3
Planning................................................................................................................................................................................... 4
Current Zoning Map ................................................................................................................................................................ 5
Supplemental Analysis ............................................................................................................................................................ 6
Community Enhancement .................................................................................................................................................. 6
Environmental Engineering ................................................................................................................................................. 6
Fire & Emergency Medical Services .................................................................................................................................... 6
Police ................................................................................................................................................................................... 6
Transportation - County Department of Transportation .................................................................................................... 6
Transportation - Virginia Department of Transportation ................................................................................................... 6
Utilities – Water and Wastewater ...................................................................................................................................... 6
Community Engagement & Public Hearings ........................................................................................................................... 7
Conditions ............................................................................................................................................................................... 8
Conditions – Redlined .............................................................................................................. Error! Bookmark not defined.
Proposed Layout Plan – Exhibit A ........................................................................................................................................... 9
Case Contacts ........................................................................................................................................................................ 10
Table of Contents
Page 187 of 295
Olson Home Based Surveying Firm 24SN1125 Page 4 of 10
Comprehensive Plan – Land Use Plan Designation
The Comprehensive Plan designates the Property for Suburban Residential II, which suggests the Property is appropriate
for residential development at a maximum density of 2.0 to 4.0 dwellings per acre.
Proposal
The property is located in the Dale Magisterial District and occupied by an existing dwelling that was built in 1971. In
addition, the property is part of the Indian Springs subdivision, and the applicant has lived at the property since 1989.
The applicant has run a surveying business from a commercial location in Chester for over fifteen (15) years and is now
looking to downsize the business. As such, the applicant is proposing to run the land surveying office from his home. This
use shall be limited to only the applicants and is nontransferable (Conditions 1 and 2). The business will only be
permitted to operate Monday through Friday from 6 AM to 6 PM, and clients shall not be permitted on the premises
(Conditions 3 and 4). Staff of the business shall not exceed six (6) employees and no more than three (3) staff shall be on
the premises at any given time (Condition 5).
Figure 3 – The photo on the left is a street view of the dwelling, and the photo on the right is a close up of the front of the dwelling.
The applicant has indicated that this will solely be an office space for the land surveying business. As such, outdoor
storage of materials for the business shall not be permitted (Condition 6). In an effort to preserve the residential nature
of the property and surrounding area, no signage shall be permitted to identify the business (Condition 7). Business
vehicles shall be parked in the parking areas designated on the proposed layout plan in Exhibit A, and no more than
three (3) business vehicles shall be parked on the premises at a time (Condition 8). Lastly, a three (3) year time limit will
be placed on this request (Condition 9).
This zoning application was not a result of a Community Enhancement violation. The applicant came to the Planning
Department on his own good will to inquire about this type of home business and pursued this conditional use
application. Furthermore, as conditioned, staff finds the use will have minimal impact on adjacent properties and
residential character of the area will be maintained should this request be granted. As such, staff recommends approval
of this request.
Planning
Page 188 of 295
Olson Home Based Surveying Firm 24SN1125 Page 5 of 10
Current Zoning Map
Page 189 of 295
Olson Home Based Surveying Firm 24SN1125 Page 6 of 10
No comment on this request.
No comment on this request.
Service Area
The Centralia Fire Station, Company Number 17
Additional Information
This request will have minimal impacts on Fire & Emergency Medical Services.
Division Beat District
Falling Creek 55 Dale
Additional Information
This request is anticipated to have minimal impacts on Police.
This request is anticipated to have a minimal impact on the transportation network.
The Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) has reviewed zoning Case 24SN1125 which requests a conditional use
to permit the operation of a surveying firm. This request provides minimal impact to VDOT maintained rights of way;
VDOT has no issue with this request as parking is noted to be provided on-site and not along the roadway.
1. The residential structure on the requested property is connected to the public water and wastewater system.
2. The request will not impact the public water or wastewater system.
3. The Utilities Department supports this request.
Supplemental Analysis
Community Enhancement
Environmental Engineering
Fire & Emergency Medical Services
Police
Transportation - County Department of Transportation
Transportation - Virginia Department of Transportation
Utilities – Water and Wastewater
Page 190 of 295
Olson Home Based Surveying Firm 24SN1125 Page 7 of 10
Community Meeting
A virtual community meeting was scheduled for July 19, 2024; however, there were no responses to the meeting
invitation, and it was cancelled.
Planning Commission
9/17/2024: Citizen Comments: No citizens spoke to this request.
Recommendation: APPROVAL WITH CONDITIONS
Motion: Petroski Second: Owens
AYES: Petroski, Sloan, Owens, Hylton, Hardin
Community Engagement & Public Hearings
Page 191 of 295
Olson Home Based Surveying Firm 24SN1125 Page 8 of 10
Staff Note: Both the Planning Commission and Staff recommend the following conditions:
1. Use. This conditional use approval shall be for a business from the home to permit a home based
surveying firm. (P)
2. Non Transferable Ownership. This conditional use approval shall be granted exclusively to Randy and
Jo Olson and shall not be transferable nor run with the land. (P)
3. Hours of Operation. The business will operate Monday through Friday from 6 AM to 6 PM. (P)
4. Clients. Clients of the business shall not be permitted on the premises. (P)
5. Staff. Staff of the business will be limited to 6 employees. No more than 3 employees may be on the
premises at a time. (P)
6. Outdoor Storage. Outdoor storage of business materials shall not be permitted. (P)
7. Signage. No signage shall be permitted to identify the business. (P)
8. Business Vehicles. Vehicles of the business shall be parked in the parking area designated on Exhibit A.
No more than three (3) work vehicles shall be on the premise at a time. (P)
9. Time Limitation. This use shall be permitted for a period of three (3) years from the date of approval.
(P)
Conditions
Page 192 of 295
Olson Home Based Surveying Firm 24SN1125 Page 9 of 10
Proposed Layout Plan – Exhibit A
Page 193 of 295
Olson Home Based Surveying Firm 24SN1125 Page 10 of 10
Applicant
• Applicant’s Contact:
Randy and Jo Olson (804-691-1487)
randylolson757@gmail.com
District Planning Commissioner
• LeQuan Hylton (804-768-7389)
hyltonl@chesterfield.gov
Staff
• Planning Department Case Manager: Haley Gist (804-748-1071) gistha@chesterfield.gov
• Budget & Management: David Oakley (804-706-2586) oakleyd@chesterfield.gov
• Community Enhancement: Ted Barclay (804-748-1802) barclayt@chesterfield.gov
• Environmental Engineering: Douglas Miles (804-768-7797) milesd@chesterfield.gov
• Fire & Emergency Medical Services: Anthony Batten (804-717-6167) battena@chesterfield.gov
• Police: Jim Eicher (804-318-8693) eicherj@chesterfield.gov
• Transportation - County Department of Transportation: Steve Adams (804-751-4461)
adamsst@chesterfield.gov
• Transportation - Virginia Department of Transportation: Dustin Dunnagan (804-674-2384)
dustin.dunnagan@vdot.virginia.gov
• Utilities: Johnny Melis (804-751-4778) melisj@chesterfield.gov
Case Contacts
Page 194 of 295
Conditional use to permit a business from the home in a
Residential (R-7) District.
Olson Home Based Surveying Firm
24SN1125 – Dale
Page 195 of 295
24SN1125 – Overview
1.Conditional use to permit a
home occupation
2.A surveying firm office
incidental to a dwelling is
being proposed
3.Planning Commission and
Staff recommend approval
Page 196 of 295
24SN1125 – Zoning Map
Page 197 of 295
24SN1125 – Aerial & Land Use Plan Map
Page 198 of 295
24SN1125 – Layout Plan – Exhibit A
Page 199 of 295
24SN1125 – Existing Dwelling
Page 200 of 295
24SN1125 – Recommendations
1.Planning Commission – Approval
2.Staff – Approval
Page 201 of 295
24SN1125 – Zoning Map
Page 202 of 295
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Meeting Date: October 30, 2024 Item Number: 17.C.2.
Subject:
24SN1129 - Holland Farm Animal - Dale
Board Action Requested:
Summary of Information:
Attachments:
1. 24SN1129 - Disclosure
2. 24SN1129-2024OCT30-BOS-RPT
3. 24SN1129-PP
Preparer:
Approved By:
Page 203 of 295
24SN1129
Page 204 of 295
Page 205 of 295
Holland Farm Animal 24SN1129 Page 1 of 11
24SN1129 – Holland Farm Animal
Magisterial District – Dale
Applicant – Kristina Holland (804-914-3632)
BOS Public Hearing – October 30, 2024
Time Remaining
12 Months
Case Manager
Haley Gist
(804-748-1071)
Request
Conditional Use
The keeping of a farm animal (one pig) is requested.
Planning Commission Recommendation
Approval
Staff Recommendation
Approval
The Property
4903 Enchanted Lane
Site Size
0.62 Acre
Comprehensive Plan –
Land Use Designation
Suburban Residential II
Plan Area
County Wide Plan
Figure 1: Aerial of Request Area – Click Image for Link to GIS
Figure 2: Area Map of Request & Land Use Plan Map
Conditional use to permit the keeping of a farm animal (one pig) in a Residential (R-7) District.
The applicant plans to continue to keep a pig on the property.
Summary of Proposal
Page 206 of 295
Holland Farm Animal 24SN1129 Page 2 of 11
PLANNING COMMISSION – APPROVAL
STAFF - APPROVAL
The Zoning Ordinance limits the keeping of farm animals in a residential district to no more than six (6) chickens and no
roosters. The keeping of stock farm animals, such as pigs, is not permitted. However, as conditioned, staff finds the use
will have minimal impact on adjacent properties. As such, staff recommends approval of this request.
NOTES FOR THE PLANNING COMMISSION AND BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
1. Conditions may be imposed.
2. Conditions have been identified in this report.
3. Both the Planning Commission and Staff recommend the conditions identified in this report.
Recommendations
Page 207 of 295
Holland Farm Animal 24SN1129 Page 3 of 11
Table of Contents
Summary of Proposal ............................................................................................................................................................... 1
Recommendations ................................................................................................................................................................... 2
Table of Contents ..................................................................................................................................................................... 3
Planning ................................................................................................................................................................................... 4
Current Zoning Map ................................................................................................................................................................. 6
Supplemental Analysis ............................................................................................................................................................. 7
Community Enhancement ................................................................................................................................................... 7
Environmental Engineering ................................................................................................................................................. 7
Fire & Emergency Medical Services ..................................................................................................................................... 7
Police .................................................................................................................................................................................... 7
Transportation - County Department of Transportation .................................................................................................... 7
Transportation - Virginia Department of Transportation .................................................................................................... 7
Utilities – Water and Wastewater ....................................................................................................................................... 7
Community Engagement & Public Hearings ............................................................................................................................ 8
Conditions ................................................................................................................................................................................ 9
Proposed Layout Plan – Exhibit A .......................................................................................................................................... 10
Case Contacts ......................................................................................................................................................................... 11
Page 208 of 295
Holland Farm Animal 24SN1129 Page 4 of 11
Zoning History
74SN0070: Approved (7/1974)
Rezoning from Agricultural (A) to Residential (R-7) for a proposed use of a single family subdivision. There were no
conditions that accompanied this zoning case.
Comprehensive Plan – Land Use Plan Designation
The Comprehensive Plan designates the Property for Medium-High Density Residential, which suggests the Property is
appropriate for residential development at a maximum density of 2.0 to 4.0 dwellings per acre.
Proposal
The applicants have been keeping a pig on the property for the past two (2) years. A complaint was received by the
Community Enhancement Department that the applicant was keeping a farm animal within a residential subdivision. The
applicants indicated that they were unaware of any restrictions related to a farm use on their Residential (R-7) zoned
property. The Zoning Ordinance limits the keeping of farm animals in a residential district to no more than six (6)
chickens and no roosters. The keeping of a pig on a residentially zoned property requires conditional use approval. The
applicants have stated that the pig is housed inside the existing dwelling on the property and let out periodically for
bathroom breaks in the fenced rear yard. In addition, documentation has been provided to staff that certifies the pig as
an Emotional Support Animal (ESA).
Figure 3 – The photos of the pig inside and outside in the fenced rear yard.
Planning
Page 209 of 295
Holland Farm Animal 24SN1129 Page 5 of 11
Conditions to help mitigate potential impacts of a farm use on a residential subdivision include limiting the conditional
use approval to the keeping of this one pig. The conditional use shall also be non -transferable ownership (Conditions 1
and 2). In addition, if the conditional use is granted, it shall be for a period of three (3) years from the date of approval
(Condition 3).
Figure 4 – Image of the fenced rear yard where the pig will have supervised outdoor time and regular bathroom breaks.
Additional conditions require the pig to be housed within the existing dwelling and any outdoor time must be supervised
within the fenced rear yard that shall be kept free of debris and animal waste (Conditions 4 and 5). An aerial view of the
property reflecting the fenced rear yard can be found in the Proposed Layout Plan in Exhibit A. The pig shall not be
replaced, and the applicants must provide a health history of the pig to the Planning Department within thirty (30) days
of the conditional use approval if granted (Conditions 6 and 7). Lastly, the existing fence shall be kept in good repair to
prevent animals pushing through or digging underneath (Condition 8). The applicant has indicated the fence has been
reinforced with hog panels to ensure this condition is met.
Page 210 of 295
Holland Farm Animal 24SN1129 Page 6 of 11
Current Zoning Map
Page 211 of 295
Holland Farm Animal 24SN1129 Page 7 of 11
No comment on this request.
No comment on this request.
Service Area
The Centralia Fire Station, Company Number 17
Additional Information
This request will have minimal impacts on Fire & Emergency Medical Services.
Division Beat District
Appomattox 76 Dale
Additional Information
This request is anticipated to have minimal impacts on Police.
This request will have no impact on the transportation network.
The Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) has reviewed zoning Case 24SN1129 to permit a conditional use to
keep a farm animal. This request does not appear to impact VDOT maintained rights-of-way.
1. The residential structure on the requested property is connected to the public water and wastewater systems.
2. The request will not impact the public water or wastewater system.
3. The Utilities Department supports this request.
Supplemental Analysis
Community Enhancement
Environmental Engineering
Fire & Emergency Medical Services
Police
Transportation - County Department of Transportation
Transportation - Virginia Department of Transportation
Utilities – Water and Wastewater
Page 212 of 295
Holland Farm Animal 24SN1129 Page 8 of 11
Community Meetings
A virtual community meeting was held for this request on August 5, 2024. Sixteen (16) individuals attended, and
discussion topics included the following:
1. Support for the applicant to continue to keep the pig
2. Concern for the pig if it would have to find a new home
3. How the pig helps the applicant as an emotional support animal
Planning Commission
9/17/24 Citizen Comments: No citizens spoke to this request.
Recommendation: APPROVAL WITH CONDITIONS
Motion: Petroski Second: Owens
AYES: Petroski, Sloan, Owens, Hylton, Hardin
Community Engagement & Public Hearings
Page 213 of 295
Holland Farm Animal 24SN1129 Page 9 of 11
Staff Note: Both the Planning Commission and Staff recommend the following conditions:
1. Use. This conditional use approval shall be limited to the keeping of a farm animal (one pig)
only. (P)
2. Non-Transferable Ownership. This conditional use approval shall be granted to and for Kristina
Holland, exclusively, and shall not be transferable nor run with the land. (P)
3. Time Limitation. The Conditional Use shall be granted for a period of three (3) years from the
date of approval and may be renewed upon satisfactory reapplication and demonstration that
the keeping of one (1) pig has not proved a detriment to the adjacent property or the area in
general. (P)
4. Location. The pig shall be housed within the existing dwelling. Any outdoor time shall be
supervised within the existing fenced in rear yard. (P)
5. Sanitation and Maintenance. The fenced in rear yard shall be maintained in a sanitary manner
by keeping it free of debris and animal waste disposed of properly. (P)
6. Replacement of Animals. Shall the pig be given, sold or pass away, it shall not be replaced. (P)
7. Health. The applicants shall provide a history of the pig such as the age, sex, color, and size as
well as a photo to the Planning Department within thirty (30) days of approval of the
Conditional Use. (P)
8. Fence. The existing fence shall be kept in good repair to prevent animals pushing through and
digging under it. (P)
Conditions
Page 214 of 295
Holland Farm Animal 24SN1129 Page 10 of 11
Proposed Layout Plan – Exhibit A
Page 215 of 295
Holland Farm Animal 24SN1129 Page 11 of 11
Applicant
• Applicant’s Contact:
Kristina Holland (804-914-3632)
kristinaholland2014@aol.com
District Planning Commissioner
• LeQuan Hylton (804-768-7389)
hyltonl@chesterfield.gov
Staff
• Planning Department Case Manager: Haley Gist (804-748-1071) gistha@chesterfield.gov
• Community Enhancement: Ted Barclay (804-748-1802) barclayt@chesterfield.gov
• Environmental Engineering: Douglas Miles (804-768-7797) milesd@chesterfield.gov
• Fire & Emergency Medical Services: Anthony Batten (804-717-6167) battena@chesterfield.gov
• Police: Jim Eicher (804-318-8693) eicherj@chesterfield.gov
• Transportation - County Department of Transportation: Steve Adams (804-751-4461)
adamsst@chesterfield.gov
• Transportation - Virginia Department of Transportation: Dustin Dunnagan (804-674-2384)
dustin.dunnagan@vdot.virginia.gov
• Utilities: Johnny Melis (804-751-4778) melisj@chesterfield.gov
Case Contacts
Page 216 of 295
Conditional use to permit the keeping of a farm animal (one
pig) in a Residential (R-7) District.
Holland Farm Animal
24SN1129 – Dale
Page 217 of 295
24SN1129 – Overview
1.Conditional use to permit
the keeping of a farm
animal (one pig)
2.As conditioned, the use will
have minimal impact on
surrounding development
3.Planning Commission and
Staff recommend approval
of this request
Page 218 of 295
24SN1129 – Zoning Map
Page 219 of 295
24SN1129 – Aerial & Land Use Plan Map
Page 220 of 295
24SN1129 – Layout Plan – Exhibit A
Page 221 of 295
24SN1129 – Existing Dwelling
Page 222 of 295
24SN1129 – Pig
Page 223 of 295
24SN1129 – Recommendation
1.Planning Commission – Approval
2.Staff – Approval
Page 224 of 295
24SN1129 – Zoning Map
Page 225 of 295
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Meeting Date: October 30, 2024 Item Number: 17.C.3.
Subject:
24SN1143 - Cabral Dwelling - Midlothian
Board Action Requested:
Summary of Information:
Attachments:
1. 24SN1143_Disclosure Affidavit
2. 24SN1143-2024OCT30-BOS-RPT
3. 24SN1143-PP
Preparer:
Approved By:
Page 226 of 295
Page 227 of 295
Page 228 of 295
Cabral Dwelling 24SN1143 Page 1 of 12
24SN1143 – Cabral Dwelling
Magisterial District – Midlothian
Applicant – David Cabral (804-528-6576)
BOS Public Hearing – October 30, 2024
Time Remaining
12 Months
Case Manager
Richard Saunders
(804-796-7192)
Request
Rezoning &
Conditional Use Planned Development
Conversion of the existing building to a single-family dwelling is
proposed.
Planning Commission Recommendation
Approval
Staff Recommendation
Approval
The Property
6615 Elkhardt Road
Site Size
0.29 Acres
Comprehensive Plan –
Land Use Designation
Suburban Residential II
Plan Area
County Wide Plan
Figure 1: Aerial of Request Area – Click Image for Link to GIS
Figure 2: Area Map of Request & Land Use Plan Map
Rezoning from Neighborhood Business (C-2) District to Residential (R-12) District. A Conditional Use Planned
Development (CUPD) is also requested for an exception to the interior side yard setback requirement.
The existing building, which is currently vacant but has most recently been used as an office, is proposed to be
converted to a single-family dwelling.
Summary of Proposal
Page 229 of 295
Cabral Dwelling 24SN1143 Page 2 of 12
PLANNING COMMISSION - APPROVAL
STAFF - APPROVAL
The proposed single-family dwelling is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan’s Land Use Plan Designation for
Suburban Residential II uses. The conversion of an old commercial building into a single family dwelling will add a use
that is in compliance with the Plan, and should not adversely impact the residential area.
NOTES FOR THE PLANNING COMMISSION AND BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
1. Conditions may be imposed, or the property owner may proffer conditions.
2. Conditions are included in this report.
3. A conceptual plan has been submitted by the applicant.
4. Both the Planning Commission and Staff recommend the conditions identified in the staff report.
Recommendations
Page 230 of 295
Cabral Dwelling 24SN1143 Page 3 of 12
Summary of Proposal .............................................................................................................................................................. 1
Recommendations .................................................................................................................................................................. 2
Table of Contents .................................................................................................................................................................... 3
Planning................................................................................................................................................................................... 4
Current Zoning Map ................................................................................................................................................................ 6
Supplemental Analysis ............................................................................................................................................................ 7
Budget & Management ....................................................................................................................................................... 7
Community Enhancement .................................................................................................................................................. 7
Environmental Engineering ................................................................................................................................................. 7
Fire & Emergency Medical Services .................................................................................................................................... 7
Libraries ............................................................................................................................................................................... 7
Parks & Recreation .............................................................................................................................................................. 7
Police ................................................................................................................................................................................... 7
Schools ................................................................................................................................................................................ 8
Transportation - County Department of Transportation .................................................................................................... 8
Transportation - Virginia Department of Transportation ................................................................................................... 8
Utilities – Water and Wastewater ...................................................................................................................................... 8
Community Engagement & Public Hearings ........................................................................................................................... 9
Conditions ............................................................................................................................................................................. 10
Proposed Layout Plan – Exhibit A ......................................................................................................................................... 11
Case Contacts ........................................................................................................................................................................ 12
Table of Contents
Page 231 of 295
Cabral Dwelling 24SN1143 Page 4 of 12
Zoning History
72-2U: Approved (1/1972)
Use Permit to operate a real estate business.
74S050: Approved (6/1974)
Rezoning from Agricultural (A) to Neighborhood Business (B-1). Proffered conditions included limitations for access points,
signage, and new structures.
Comprehensive Plan – Land Use Plan Designation
The Comprehensive Plan designates the Property for Suburban Residential II, which suggests the Property is appropriate
for residential development at a maximum density of 2.0 to 4.0 dwellings per acre.
Proposal
The conversion of a vacant building into a single-family dwelling is proposed. The building on the property was originally
constructed as a single-family dwelling in the early 1950s and was converted into an office building in the 1970s after
originally being granted a use permit and later being rezoned to Neighborhood Business (at the time was B-1 and is now
C-2). The building has been vacant for several years.
The applicant proposes Residential (R-12) zoning, which permits the conversion of the building back to a single-family
dwelling. Additionally, the applicant requests a conditional use planned development (CUPD) for an exception to the
interior side yard setback requirement along the western property line. An image of the building is shown in Figure 3
and the layout of the property is shown in Figure 4 and as Exhibit A.
Figure 3: Image of Building from Elkhardt Road
Planning
Page 232 of 295
Cabral Dwelling 24SN1143 Page 5 of 12
Figure 4: Site Layout
Ordinance Exceptions
The Residential (R-12) District requires an interior side yard setback of ten (10) feet; the existing building is (0.1) of a foot
off the western interior property line, which requires a (9.9) foot exception.
Staff supports the requested exception as the existing setback will be maintained along the western property line. Any
additions or new structures will be required to meet the setback requirements at time of development.
Page 233 of 295
Cabral Dwelling 24SN1143 Page 6 of 12
Current Zoning Map
Page 234 of 295
Cabral Dwelling 24SN1143 Page 7 of 12
No comment on this request.
No comment on this request.
No comment on this request.
Service Area
The Manchester Fire Station, Company Number 2
Additional Information
This request will have minimal impacts on Fire & Emergency Medical Services.
No comment on this request.
No comment on this request.
Division Beat District
Falling Creek 59 Midlothian
Additional Information
This request is anticipated to have minimal impacts on Police.
Supplemental Analysis
Budget & Management
Community Enhancement
Environmental Engineering
Fire & Emergency Medical Services
Libraries
Parks & Recreation
Police
Page 235 of 295
Cabral Dwelling 24SN1143 Page 8 of 12
No comment on this request.
This request will have a minimal impact on the transportation network.
The Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) has reviewed zoning Case 24SN1143, to rezone the property and to
provide an exception to side yard building setbacks. This request does not appear to impact VDOT maintained right-of-
way (ROW).
1. The existing structure is connected to the public water system and served by a private septic system.
2. The request will not impact the public water system.
3. The Utilities Department supports this request.
Schools
Transportation - County Department of Transportation
Transportation - Virginia Department of Transportation
Utilities – Water and Wastewater
Page 236 of 295
Cabral Dwelling 24SN1143 Page 9 of 12
Community Meetings
A virtual community meeting was scheduled for August 27, 2024, however there were no responses to the meeting
notice and the meeting was cancelled.
Planning Commission
9/17/2024 Citizen Comments: No citizens spoke to this request.
Recommendation: Recommended approval with conditions.
Motion: Petroski Second: Owens
AYES: Petroski, Sloan, Hardin, Hylton, Owens
Community Engagement & Public Hearings
Page 237 of 295
Cabral Dwelling 24SN1143 Page 10 of 12
Staff Note: Both the Planning Commission and Staff recommend approval of the request with the following imposed condition.
1. Setback Exception. The side yard setback for the existing building along the western property line shall be (0.1) of
a foot, as shown in Exhibit A. Any new additions, buildings or structures shall meet the minimum setback
requirements of the applicable zoning district. (P)
Conditions
Page 238 of 295
Cabral Dwelling 24SN1143 Page 11 of 12
Proposed Layout Plan – Exhibit A
Page 239 of 295
Cabral Dwelling 24SN1143 Page 12 of 12
Applicant
• Applicant’s Contact:
David Cabral (804-528-6576)
davidcabral84@hotmail.com
District Planning Commissioner
• Frank Petroski (804-768-7558)
petroskif@chesterfield.gov
Staff
• Planning Department Case Manager: Richard Saunders (804-796-7192) saundersri@chesterfield.gov
• Community Enhancement: Ted Barclay (804-748-1802) barclayt@chesterfield.gov
• Environmental Engineering: Douglas Miles (804-768-7797) milesd@chesterfield.gov
• Fire & Emergency Medical Services: Anthony Batten (804-717-6167) battena@chesterfield.gov
• Police: Jim Eicher (804-318-8693) eicherj@chesterfield.gov
• Transportation - County Department of Transportation: Steve Adams (804-751-4461)
adamsst@chesterfield.gov
• Transportation - Virginia Department of Transportation: Dustin Dunnagan (804-674-2384)
dustin.dunnagan@vdot.virginia.gov
• Utilities: Johnny Melis (804-751-4778) melisj@chesterfield.gov
Case Contacts
Page 240 of 295
Rezone from Neighborhood Business (C-2) to Residential (R-
12) with conditional use planned development to permit an
exception to ordinance requirements for a single family
dwelling on 0.29 acre.
Cabral Dwelling
24SN1143 – Midlothian
Case 24SN1143, in the Midlothian Magisterial District, Cabral Dwelling is a request for
rezoning from Neighborhood Business (C-2) to Residential (R-12) plus conditional use
planned development to permit an exception to ordinance requirements. The
existing building is proposed to be converted to a single family dwelling.
1Page 241 of 295
24SN1143 – Overview
1. Rezone to Residential (R-12) plus
exception to interior side yard
setback to convert existing
building to single family dwelling
2. Conversion of an old commercial
building into a dwelling is in
compliance with Comprehensive
Plan
3. Planning Commission & Staff
recommend approval
Overview Slide.
2Page 242 of 295
24SN1143 – Zoning Map
The Property contains 0.29 acres and is currently zoned Neighborhood Business (C-2).
Properties to the west and south are zoned Residential (R-7). Property to the north is
zoned Agricultural (A). Chippenham Parkway and the City of Richmond are located to
the east of the subject property.
3Page 243 of 295
24SN1143 – Aerial & Land Use Plan Map
The subject property is outlined in white in the images above. Properties to the
north and west are developed with single-family houses. Properties to the south are
developed with single-family houses and a place of worship. The Land Use Plan
designation for the property is Suburban Residential II.
4Page 244 of 295
24SN1143 – Layout Plan
The layout plan on the left shows the location of the existing building, which will be
converted into a single-family dwelling. An exception to the interior side yard setback
requirement along the western property line is needed since the existing building is
set back only (0.1) foot. The photo on the right shows the existing condition of the
building, as seen from Elkhardt Road.
5Page 245 of 295
24SN1143 – Recommendation
Planning Commission - Approval
Staff Recommendation - Approval
Planning Commission and Staff recommend approval of this request. The proposed
single-family dwelling is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan’s Land Use Plan
Designation for Suburban Residential II uses. The conversion of an old commercial
building into a single family dwelling will add a use that is in compliance with the
Plan, and should not adversely impact the residential area.
6Page 246 of 295
24SN1143 – Zoning Map
End of Presentation.
7Page 247 of 295
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Meeting Date: October 30, 2024 Item Number: 18.A.
Subject:
To Consider an Ordinance to Amend the Zoning Ordinance Relative to Chesapeake Bay Preservation Areas
Board Action Requested:
Approve updates to the Zoning Ordinance Regarding Chesapeake Bay Preservation Areas (Tree Preservation
and Climate Resilience)
Summary of Information:
The Commonwealth of Virginia’s Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) is requiring updates to local
Chesapeake Bay ordinances for state code changes related to coastal resilience and adaption to sea-level rise
and climate change, and for the preservation of mature trees. Accordingly, Chesterfield County must update its
zoning ordinance to incorporate those changes. Subsequent to the Planning Commission's public hearing and
recommendation of approval at its August 2024 meeting, two typos were identified in the draft ordinance
amendment and have been corrected. In section 19.1-524.A.2, the reference to the Virginia Administrative
Code was changed from 9VAC25-830-55B to 9VAC25-830-155B. In section 19.1-254.C.1.f, the word
"adaptive" was changed to "adaptation."
Attachments:
1. Ches Bay ordinance amendment - October 2024 BOS
2. Staff Presentation
Preparer: Thomas Jenkins, Zoning Administrator
Approved By:
Page 248 of 295
AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE CODE OF THE COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD, 1997,
AS AMENDED, BY AMENDING AND REENACTING SECTIONS 19.1-247, 19.1-520
THROUGH 19.1-529, AND 19.1-570 OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE RELATIVE TO
CHESAPEAKE BAY PRESERVATION AREAS (TREE PRESERVATION AND CLIMATE
RESILIENCE)
BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County:
(1) That Sections 19.1-247, 19.1-520 through 19.1-529, and 19.1-570 of the Code of the County of
Chesterfield, 1997, as amended, are amended and re-enacted, to read as follows:
Chapter 19.1
ZONING
OOO
Sec. 19.1-247. Tree Preservation.
1. Preservation. Existing trees and shrubs within required setbacks along roads and
buffers shall be retained to provide continuity, improve buffering, and minimize new
landscaping that requires watering. At time of plan review, removal of existing healthy
vegetation may be approved to accommodate vehicular access or utilities that run
generally perpendicular through the setback or buffer, or as necessary to accommodate
healthy vegetative growth.
2. Credits for Preservation. Healthy existing vegetation may be credited toward
landscaping requirements provided it is reasonably distributed throughout the setback,
buffer or other required landscape area.
3. Root Protection Zone during Construction. Land disturbance other than for access
or utilities shall be allowed in setbacks along roads provided that such disturbance is
no closer to the tree than the root protection zone. The root protection zone is a one
foot radius around the tree for each inch of trunk diameter measured 4.5 feet above
grade. However, under no circumstances shall the root protection zone extend beyond
the road setback limits.
4. Upper Swift Creek Watershed Tree Canopy. Tree preservation shall be required in
compliance with Sec. 19.1-545 within the Upper Swift Creek Watershed.
5. Mature Trees. Mature Trees shall be protected during development and only removed
where necessary, including to provide for the proposed use or development.
OOO
Page 249 of 295
2
Sec. 19.1-520. Resource Protection Area Boundaries.
A. At a minimum, resource protection areas shall consist of lands adjacent to water bodies
with perennial flow that have an intrinsic water quality value due to the ecological and
biological processes they perform or because they are sensitive to impacts which may cause
significant degradation to the quality of state waters. In their natural condition, these lands
provide for the removal, reduction or assimilation of sediments, nutrients and potentially
harmful or toxic substances in runoff entering the bay and its tributaries, and minimize the
adverse effects of human activities on state waters and aquatic resources.
B. Resource protection areas shall consist of:
1. Tidal wetlands.
2. Nontidal wetlands connected by surface flow that are contiguous to tidal wetlands or
water bodies with perennial flow.
3. Tidal shores.
4. A vegetated RPA buffer area a minimum of 100 feet in width, located adjacent to and
landward of the environmental features listed in Section 19.1-520.B.1. through B.3.,
and along both sides of any water body with perennial flow. The full RPA buffer area
shall be designated as the landward component of the resource protection area.
5. Such other lands determined by the department of environmental engineering to meet
the provisions of 19.1-520.A. and to be necessary to protect the quality of state waters.
C. Designation of the components listed in Section 19.1-520.B.1. through B.3. shall not be
subject to modification unless based on reliable, site specific information as provided for
in 9 VAC 25-830-110.
Sec. 19.1-521. Resource Management Area Boundaries.
A. Resource management areas shall include land types that, if improperly used or developed,
have a potential for causing significant water quality degradation or for diminishing the
functional value of the resource protection area.
B. A resource management area shall be provided contiguous to the entire inland boundary of
the resource protection area. Resource management areas consist of one or more of the
following:
1. 100 year floodplains.
2. Highly erodible soils, including steep slopes.
3. Highly permeable soils.
Page 250 of 295
3
4. Nontidal wetlands not included in resource protection areas.
5. Land areas a minimum of 100 feet in width that are located adjacent to and landward
of every resource protection area.
Sec. 19.1-522. Chesapeake Bay Preservation Areas Maps.
Chesapeake Bay preservation areas include resource protection areas and resource
management areas. Subject to any adjustments by the director of environmental
engineering pursuant to Section 19.1-523, the boundaries of these areas are included as a
map layer in the County’s Geographic Information System (GIS) which is available for
viewing online at https://geospace.chesterfield.gov/in the department of environmental
engineering. This GIS map layer shall serve as the general determination of the extent of
the resource protection area boundary as defined in 9 VAC 25-830-80.
Sec. 19.1-523. Site-Specific Refinements of Chesapeake Bay Area Boundaries and Boundary
Adjustments.
A. As part of, or prior to, the zoning application or plan review processes, or during the review
of a water quality impact assessment pursuant to Section 19.1-524.E., a reliable, site-
specific evaluation shall be conducted and approved by the environmental engineering
department to determine whether water bodies on or adjacent to the proposed development
site have perennial flow. The Resource Protection Area boundaries for the site shall then
be adjusted, as necessary, based on this evaluation. Upon the completion of a countywide
map depicting streams with perennial flow, as identified utilizing a scientifically valid
method approved by the State Water Control Board, the site-specific evaluations shall no
longer be required.
B. The director of environmental engineering may adjust the delineation of any resource
protection area boundaries when an environmental site assessment prepared by a qualified
expert indicates a need for change based on the environmental features listed in Section
19.1-520.B.1through 19.1-520.B.4. The environmental site assessment shall be drawn to
scale and shall clearly delineate such environmental features. Wetlands delineations shall
be performed in accordance with the procedures specified in the most recently approved
edition(s) of the Federal Manual for Identifying and Delineating Jurisdictional Wetlands.
C. The director of environmental engineering may adjust the delineation of any resource
management area boundaries when an environmental site assessment prepared by a
qualified expert indicates a need for such change based on the environmental features listed
in Section 19.1-521.B. The environmental site assessment shall be drawn to scale and shall
clearly delineate such environmental features. Wetlands delineations shall be performed in
accordance with the procedures specified in the most recently approved edition(s) of the
Federal Manual for Identifying and Delineating Jurisdictional Wetlands.
Page 251 of 295
4
D. Any person aggrieved by the director of environmental engineering's decision concerning
the boundaries of a resource protection area or a resource management area may appeal
such decision in accordance with Section 19.1-30.C.
E. Boundary adjustments shall not be available to property that is undergoing redevelopment
if, due to previous development of the property, the Chesapeake Bay preservation area
features listed in Section 19.1-520.B. or Section 19.1-521.B. cannot be determined.
F. A Resource Protection Area designation may be deferred at time of plan review for a Line
Modification or Family Subdivision plat in accordance with Section 17-56.
Sec. 19.1-524. Resource Protection Area Regulations
In addition to the general performance criteria set forth in Section 19.1-525., the criteria in this
section are applicable in resource protection areas.
A. Land development may be allowed in a resource protection area, subject to the approval of
the department of environmental engineering, only if it is water dependent, constitutes
redevelopment, is a permitted encroachment established pursuant to Section 19.1-54.D., is
a road or driveway crossing satisfying the conditions set forth in Section19.1-524.A.4., or
is a flood control or stormwater management facility satisfying the conditions set forth in
Section 19.1-524.A.5.
1. A water quality impact assessment in accordance with Section 19.1-524.E.1. shall be
required for any proposed land disturbance.
2. A resiliency assessment as set forth in Section 9 VAC 25-830-155B, that considers the
potential impacts of sea level rise, storm surge, and flooding, shall be required for any
proposed land development in the RPA during the plan of development or project
review process.
23. A new or expanded water-dependent facility may be permitted, provided that:
a. It does not conflict with the comprehensive plan;
b. It complies with the performance criteria set forth in Sections 19.1-524.B. and 19.1-
525;
c. Any nonwater-dependent component is located outside any resource protection
area; and
d. Access shall be provided with minimum disturbance necessary. If possible, a single
point of access shall be provided.
34. Redevelopment shall be permitted in the Resource Protection Area only if there is no
increase in the amount of impervious cover and no further encroachment within the
Resource Protection Area, and it shall conform to applicable erosion and sediment
Page 252 of 295
5
control and stormwater management criteria set forth in Section 19.1-525 and the
Erosion and Sediment Control Law and the Virginia Erosion and Stormwater
Management Act and their attendant regulations and Chapter 8 Article V of this code
as well as all applicable stormwater management requirements of other state and
federal agencies.
45. Roads and driveways not exempt under Section 19.1-527.A.1. may be constructed in
or across Resource Protection Areas only if each of the following conditions are met:
a. The department of environmental engineering makes a finding that there are no
reasonable alternatives to aligning the road or driveway in or across the Resource
Protection Area.
b. The alignment and design of the road or driveway are optimized, consistent with
other applicable requirements, to minimize the encroachment in the Resource
Protection Area and adverse impacts on water quality.
c. The design and construction of the road or driveway satisfies all applicable criteria
of this chapter, including submission of a water quality impact assessment.
d. The department of environmental engineering reviews the plan for the road or
driveway proposed in or across the Resource Protection Area.
56. Flood control and stormwater management facilities that drain or treat water from
multiple development projects or from a significant portion of a watershed may be
allowed in Resource Protection Areas, provided that:
a. the department of environmental engineering has conclusively established that the
location of the facility within the Resource Protection Area is the optimum location;
b. the size of the facility is the minimum necessary to provide necessary flood control,
stormwater treatment, or both;
c. the facility must be consistent with a comprehensive stormwater management
plan developed and approved in accordance with Chapter 8 Article V Erosion
and Stormwater Management 9VAC25-870-92 of the Virginia Stormwater
Management Program (VSMP) regulations;
d. all applicable permits for construction in state or federal waters must be obtained
from the appropriate state and federal agencies, such as the U. S. Army Corps of
Engineers, the Virginia Department of Environmental Quality, and the Virginia
Marine Resources Commission;
e. approval must be received from the department of environmental engineering prior
to construction; and
Page 253 of 295
6
f. routine maintenance is allowed to be performed on such facilities to assure that they
continue to function as designed. It is not the intent to allow a best management
practice that collects and treats runoff from only an individual lot or some portion
of the lot to be located within a Resource Protection Area.
B. RPA buffer area requirements. The 100 foot RPA buffer area shall be the landward
component of the Resource Protection Area as set forth in Section 19.1-520.B.4.
Notwithstanding permitted uses and encroachments, as set forth in 19.1-524.C.and 19.1-
524.D., the 100 foot RPA buffer area shall not be reduced in width. To minimize the
adverse effects of human activities on the other components of the Resource Protection
Area, state waters, and aquatic life, a l00-foot wide RPA buffer area of vegetation that is
effective in retarding runoff, preventing erosion, and filtering nonpoint source pollution
from runoff shall be retained, if present, and established where it does not exist. The
planting of trees shall be incorporated into the reestablishment of the 100-foot buffer, as
appropriate to site conditions and in such a manner to maximize the buffer function as
determined by the Director of Environmental Engineering. Inclusion of native species in
tree planting is preferred. The following criteria shall apply to the 100 foot RPA buffer
area.
1. The 100 foot wide RPA buffer area shall be deemed to achieve a 75% reduction of
sediments and a 40% reduction of nutrients.
2. Where land uses such as agriculture or silviculture within the area of the RPA buffer
area cease and the lands are proposed to be converted to other uses, the full 100 foot
wide RPA buffer area shall be reestablished. In reestablishing the RPA buffer area,
management measures shall be undertaken to provide woody vegetation that assures
the RPA buffer area functions set forth in this chapter. Where such buffer must be
reestablished, the planting of trees shall be incorporated as appropriate to site
conditions and in such a manner to maximize the buffer function as determined by the
Director of Environmental Engineering. Inclusion of native species in tree planting is
preferred.
3. Existing vegetation in the RPA buffer area shall not be cleared or disturbed except as
provided in Section 19.1-524.C.and 19.1-524.D. and with the prior approval of the
environmental engineering department.
C. Permitted modifications of the RPA buffer area.
1. In order to maintain the functional value of the RPA buffer, existing vegetation may be
removed, subject to the approval of the environmental engineering department, only to
provide for reasonable sight lines, access paths, general woodlot management and best
management practices, including those that prevent upland erosion and concentrated
flows of stormwater, as follows:
a. In general, where the removal of trees within the buffer area is proposed, mature
trees shall be preserved and trimmed or pruned in lieu of removal as site conditions
permit and removal should be limited to the fewest number of trees feasible. Where
Page 254 of 295
7
tree planting for mitigation, conservation, landscaping, or for buffer
reestablishment is proposed, inclusion of native species in tree planting is preferred.
ab. Trees may be pruned, thinned, or removed if necessary to provide for sight lines
and vistas. If trees are removed, they shall be replaced with other vegetation that,
in the judgment of the environmental engineering department, is equally effective
in retarding runoff, preventing erosion and filtering nonpoint source pollution from
runoff.
bc. Any path shall be constructed and surfaced to effectively control erosion.
cd. Dead, diseased or dying trees or shrubbery and noxious weeds (such as Johnson
grass, kudzu, and multiflora rose) may be removed, and thinning of trees may be
allowed, pursuant to sound horticultural practices.
de. For shoreline erosion control projects, trees and woody vegetation may be removed,
necessary control techniques employed, and appropriate vegetation established to
protect or stabilize the shoreline in accordance with 9VAC25-830-155C.1.c the best
available technical advice and applicable permit conditions or requirements. The
removal of mature trees for the installation and maintenance of proposed shoreline
erosion control projects shall only be permitted as necessary and consistent with
the best available technical advice, approved project plans, and applicable permit
conditions or requirements. Inclusion of native species is preferred.
f. Adaptation measures proposed for location within the RPA shall meet the criteria
and requirements outlined in 9VAC25-830-155C.
2. On agricultural lands, the RPA buffer area shall be managed to prevent concentrated
flows of surface water from breaching the RPA buffer area and appropriate measures
may be taken to prevent noxious weeds (such as Johnson grass, kudzu, and multiflora
rose) from invading the RPA buffer area. Agricultural activities may encroach into the
RPA buffer area only as follows:
a. Agricultural activities may encroach within the landward 50 feet of the 100 foot
wide RPA buffer area when at least one agricultural best management practice
which, in the opinion of the local soil and water conservation district board,
addresses the more predominant water quality issue on the adjacent land is being
implemented on the adjacent land provided that the combination of the undisturbed
RPA buffer area and the best management practice achieves water quality
protection, pollutant removal, and water resource conservation at least the
equivalent of the 100 foot RPA buffer area. If nutrient management is identified as
the predominant water quality issue, a nutrient management plan, including soil
tests, must be developed consistent with the Virginia Nutrient Training and
Certification Regulations (4VAC 50-85) administered by the Virginia Department
of Conservation and Recreation.
b. Agricultural activities may encroach within the landward 75 feet of the 100 foot
wide RPA buffer area when agricultural best management practices which address
Page 255 of 295
8
erosion control, nutrient management, and pest chemical control, approved by the
James River soil and water conservation district, are being implemented on the
adjacent land. The erosion control practices must prevent erosion from exceeding
the soil loss tolerance levels, referred to as “T,” as defined in the National Soil
Survey Handbook of November 1996 in the Field Office Technical Guide of the
U.S. Department of Agriculture Natural Resource Conservation Service. A nutrient
management plan, including soil tests, must be developed, consistent with the
Virginia Nutrient Management Training and Certification Regulations (4VAC 50-
85) administered by the Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation. In
conjunction with the remaining RPA buffer area, this collection of best
management practices shall be presumed to achieve water quality protection at least
the equivalent of that provided by the 100 foot RPA buffer area.
c. The RPA buffer area is not required for drainage ditches associated with
agricultural land if the adjacent agricultural land has in place at least one best
management practice which, in the opinion of the James River soil and water
conservation district, addresses the predominant water quality issues on the
adjacent land.
D. Permitted encroachments into the RPA buffer area.
1. When the application of the RPA buffer area would result in the loss of a buildable area
on a lot or parcel recorded prior to October 1, 1989, encroachments into the RPA buffer
area may be permitted by the director of environmental engineering. A written request
shall identify the impact of the proposed exception on water quality, on public safety,
and on lands within the resource protection area through the completion of a water
quality impact assessment that complies with Section 19.1-524.E. and shall be in
accordance with the following criteria:
a. Encroachments into the RPA buffer area shall be the minimum necessary to achieve
a buildable area for a principal structure and necessary utilities.
b. Where practicable, a vegetated area that will maximize water quality protection,
mitigate the effects of the RPA buffer area encroachment, and is equal to the area
of encroachment into the RPA buffer area shall be established elsewhere on the lot
or parcel. Where established, such vegetated area shall include the planting of trees
as appropriate to site conditions. Inclusion of native species in tree planting is
preferred.
c. The encroachment may not extend into the seaward 50 feet of the RPA buffer area.
2. When the application of the RPA buffer area would result in the loss of a buildable area
on a lot or parcel recorded between October 1, 1989 and March 1, 2002, encroachments
into the RPA buffer area may be allowed through an administrative process in
accordance with the following criteria:
Page 256 of 295
9
a. The lot or parcel was created as a result of a legal process conducted in conformity
with the county’s subdivision ordinance;
b. Conditions or mitigation measures imposed through a previously approved
exception shall be met;
c. If the use of a best management practice (BMP) was previously required, the BMP
shall be evaluated to determine if it continues to function effectively and, if
necessary, the BMP shall be reestablished or repaired and maintained as required;
d. The requirements of Section 19.1-524.D.1 shall be met.
3. When the application of the RPA buffer area would result in the loss of a buildable area
on a lot or parcel created as the result of bankruptcy, condemnation or threat of
condemnation, judicial partition or judicial action relating to a decedent’s estate,
encroachments into the RPA buffer area may be allowed through an administrative
process in accordance with the requirements of Section 19.1-524.D.2.b., c., and d.
E. Water quality impact assessments and resource protection area restoration plans.
1. A water quality impact assessment shall be submitted to, and approved by, the
environmental engineering department for any proposed development within a
resource protection area, including any RPA buffer area modification or encroachment
authorized as provided by Section 19.1-524.D. and may be required by the director of
environmental engineering for any other development in Chesapeake Bay preservation
areas based on the site's unique characteristics or the intensity of the proposed use or
development. The purpose of the water quality impact assessment is to identify and,
where applicable, quantify the impacts of proposed development on water quality and
lands in the Resource Protection Areas consistent with the goals and objectives of the
Chesapeake Bay Preservation Act, this chapter, and to identify specific measures for
the mitigation of those impacts. There shall be two types of water quality impact
assessments: a minor assessment and a major assessment.
a. Minor water quality impact assessment. A minor water quality impact assessment
shall be required for a development or redevelopment which involves 2,500 square
feet or less of land disturbance. The minor water quality assessment must
demonstrate that the combination of undisturbed RPA buffer area, restoration
plantings, and identified best management practices or measures will be effective
in retarding runoff, preventing erosion, and filtering nonpoint source pollution from
runoff. The minor water quality impact assessment shall include a site drawing, to
scale if practicable, which shows the following:
1) The location of the resource protection area;
2) The location, nature and quantification of proposed encroachments into the
resource protection area, including type of material proposed to be used for
access paths, areas of clearing or grading, location of any structures, drives or
other impervious surfaces;
Page 257 of 295
10
3) Justification for the proposed encroachment;
4) Type and proposed location of any best management practice facilities or
measures;
5) Existing and proposed runoff outfalls from the property;
6) Location and density of existing vegetation on site, including the number and
type of trees and other vegetation to be removed in the RPA buffer area as a
result of the encroachment or modification; and
7) A restoration plan that includes the replacement of vegetation that has been
removed from the RPA buffer area. The type, quantity and density of
vegetation shall be capable of retarding runoff, preventing erosion, and filtering
nonpoint source pollution from runoff.
b. Major water quality impact assessment. A major water quality impact assessment
shall be required for a development which exceeds 2,500 square feet of land
disturbance. The major water quality impact assessment shall be prepared by a
qualified expert and shall include:
1) All information required for a minor water quality impact assessment;
2) A description of the proposed encroachment including:
o A description of the proposed improvements, including structures (including
the type and size), roads, access paths, irrigations systems, lighting systems,
and utilities;
o If an access path is proposed, an identification of the location of the path and
the materials that will be used for the path.
3) A description of the encroachment site's physical characteristics including:
o The site's existing topography, soil characteristics, erosion potential and
hydrology;
o A description of wetland areas including their functions and values;
o A description of streams and other water bodies;
o Location and density of existing vegetation on site, including the number and
type of trees and other vegetation categorized by type (e.g. shrubs, trees,
groundcover) within 50 feet of the proposed land disturbance.
4) A discussion of the potential water quality impacts of the proposed
encroachment, including:
o A quantification of any identified impacts on streams or other water bodies,
including potential erosion and sedimentation that could enter those waters as a
result of the encroachment;
o An identification and quantification of any impacts on wetlands, including
impacts on wetland hydrology;
Page 258 of 295
11
o An identification of temporary or permanent impacts to streams or other water
bodies;
o An identification of any areas to be disturbed outside the resource protection
area that have the potential to adversely affect the resource protection area;
o The limits of clearing and grading, and the percent of the site to be cleared;
o Where applicable, an estimation of the pre-construction and post-construction
pollutant loads;
o Estimation of the percent increase in impervious cover;
o A discussion of the number and type of trees and other vegetation to be removed
in the RPA buffer area as a result of the encroachment or modification;
o A discussion of proposed changes to the site topography and hydrology and the
impacts of those changes on water quality;
o A construction schedule, including the anticipated duration of construction.
5) A discussion of measures to mitigate the identified impacts, including:
o A Restoration Plan that includes the replacement of vegetation that has been
removed from the RPA buffer area. The Plan shall include the schedule for
replanting, which shall take into account the appropriate season for replanting.
The type, quantity and density of vegetation specified shall be capable of
retarding runoff, preventing erosion, and filtering nonpoint source pollution
from runoff. The vegetation specified plantings shall, to the maximum extent
practicable, consist of native species.
o A listing of proposed erosion and sediment control measures, including
additional measures that are beyond those required in chapter 8 of the code. A
listing of best management practices and measures to reduce impacts on water
quality;
o A discussion that demonstrates, in a quantifiable manner, that the combination
of revegetation and best management practices will achieve pollutant removal
that is equivalent to that which is achieved without the encroachment.
o A listing of other mitigation measures that may be required by the director of
environmental engineering.
F. Violations of this section may result in court action being taken to result in fines and/or an
order to abate the violation and bring the property into compliance with this section, which
may include the violator being required to submit a resource protection area restoration
plan and an appropriate surety in an amount to purchase and plant any vegetation required
by the restoration plan which does not survive for one year from date of planting. The
amount and form of the surety must be in a form approved by the county attorney's office
and may consist of a certified check, cash escrow, a surety bond, or a letter of credit from
a financial institution.
Sec. 19.1-525. General Performance Criteria.
Any use, development or redevelopment of land within a Chesapeake Bay Preservation
Area shall meet the following performance criteria:
Page 259 of 295
12
1. No more land shall be disturbed than is necessary to provide for the proposed use or
development.
2. Indigenous vegetation shall be preserved to the maximum extent practicable consistent
with the use or development allowed.
3. Land development shall minimize impervious cover consistent with the use or
development allowed.
4. All development exceeding 2,500 square feet of land disturbance shall be subject to the
site plan or subdivision review processes.
5. Any land disturbing activity that exceeds an area of 2,500 square feet (including
construction of all single family houses, septic tanks and drainfields, but otherwise as
defined in § 62.1-44.15:51of the Code of Virginia) shall comply with the requirements
of the local erosion and sediment control ordinance.
6. Stormwater management criteria consistent with the water quality protection
provisions of the Virginia Stormwater Management Regulations shall be satisfied.
a. The following stormwater management options shall be considered to comply with
this requirement:
• Incorporation on the site of best management practices that meet the water
quality protection requirements. For the purposes of this provision, the site may
include multiple projects or properties that are adjacent to one another or lie
within the same drainage area where a single best management practice will be
utilized by those projects to satisfy water quality protection requirements;
• Compliance with site-specific VPDES permit issued by the Department of
Environmental Quality provided the department of environmental engineering
specifically determines that the permit requires measures that collectively
achieve water quality protection equivalent to that required.
b. Any maintenance, alteration, use or improvement to an existing structure that does
not degrade the quality of surface water discharge, as determined by the director of
environmental engineering, may be exempted from the requirements. Any person
aggrieved by a decision of the director of environmental engineering under Section
19.1-525.6 may appeal such decision in accordance with the procedures provided
in Section 19.1-30.C.
c. Stormwater management criteria for redevelopment shall apply to any
redevelopment.
7. Where the best management practices utilized in a commercial development require
regular or periodic maintenance in order to continue their functions, such maintenance
shall be ensured by a maintenance/easement agreement, commercial surety bond, bank
Page 260 of 295
13
letter of credit or other assurance satisfactory to the director of environmental
engineering. Where the best management practices utilized for a residential
development require regular or periodic maintenance in order to continue their
functions, such maintenance shall be ensured by a commercial surety bond, bank letter
of credit or cash escrow in an amount equal to $250.00 for each dwelling unit in a
residential development. The requirement excludes apartment developments outside
the Swift Creek Reservoir Watershed. The form of any bond or letter of credit provided
pursuant to this section shall be approved by the county attorney.
8. Within the Upper Swift Creek Watershed, where the best management practices
utilized in a commercial development require regular or periodic maintenance in order
to continue their functions, such maintenance shall be ensured by a commercial surety
bond, bank letter of credit or cash escrow in an amount equal to $3,000.00 for each
impervious acre or fraction thereof. The form of any bond or letter of credit provided
pursuant to this section shall be approved by the county attorney.
9. Except as follows, RMA performance criteria shall not apply to land used for
agricultural purposes. Land on which agricultural activities are being conducted,
including but not limited to crop production, pasture, and dairy and feedlot operations,
shall have a soil and water quality conservation assessment conducted that evaluates
the effectiveness of existing practices pertaining to soil erosion and sediment control,
nutrient management, and management of pesticides and, where necessary, results in a
plan that outlines additional practices needed to ensure that water quality protection is
being accomplished consistent with the Chesapeake Bay Preservation Act and this
division.
10. The director of environmental engineering may authorize the developer to use a
retention or detention basin or alternative best management practice facility to achieve
the performance criteria set forth in this chapter.
11. The department of environmental engineering shall require evidence of all wetlands
permits required by law prior to authorizing grading or other on-site activities.
12. For sites subject to subdivision review, the subdivider shall post signs demarking the
limits of the RPA so builders and homeowners are informed as to the limitations
imposed on these areas. Specific plans for the exact number and placement of the signs
shall be approved by the director of environmental engineering.
13. Except for the Upper Swift Creek Watershed, all new construction and substantial
improvements of residential dwellings shall have minimum setbacks from an RPA
which encroaches within a lot or parcel that is the lesser of the applicable yard setback
requirement of the underlying zoning district or 25 feet. Specifically, setbacks shall be
measured from the closest boundary of the RPA to the principal structure and the
required setbacks shall be determined by the yard in which the RPA boundary is
located. In the Upper Swift Creek Watershed, all new construction and substantial
Page 261 of 295
14
improvements of residential dwellings shall have a minimum setback from the RPA of
35 feet.
14. Except for the Upper Swift Creek Watershed, all new construction and substantial
improvements of residential dwellings shall have a minimum setback of at least 25 feet
horizontal distance from the outer most boundaries of nontidal wetlands not located
within resource protection areas. In the Upper Swift Creek Watershed, all new
construction and substantial improvements of residential dwellings shall have a
minimum setback of at least 35 feet horizontal distance from the outer most boundaries
of the nontidal wetlands not located within resource protection areas.
15. All new construction and substantial improvements of nonresidential structures and
accessory buildings shall meet requirements of Section 19.1-503.A.7.
Sec. 19.1-526. Exemptions in Resource Protection Areas.
A. The following land disturbances in resource protection areas may be exempt from the
criteria of Section 19.1-524. provided that, in the judgment of the director of environmental
engineering, they comply with the conditions listed below: water wells, passive recreation
facilities such as boardwalks, trails and pathways, and historic preservation and
archaeological activities.
1. Any required permits, except those to which this exemption specifically applies, shall
have been issued;
2. Sufficient and reasonable proof is submitted that the intended use shall not result in an
adverse impact on water quality;
3. The intended use does not conflict with nearby planned or approved uses; and
4. Any land disturbance exceeding an area of 2,500 square feet shall comply with all
erosion and sediment control requirements of Chapter 8.
B. Silvicultural activities in Chesapeake Bay Preservation Areas shall be exempt from this
division's requirements, provided that such activities adhere to water quality protection
procedures prescribed by the Virginia Department of Forestry the Fifth Edition (March
2011) of Virginia’s Forestry Best Management Practices for Water Quality Technical
Manual, as amended. The Virginia Department of Forestry will oversee and document
installation of best management practices and will monitor in-stream impacts of forestry
operations in Chesapeake Bay Preservation Areas. This exemption shall not apply to land
disturbing activities on land in an agriculturally zoned district which is not used directly
for the management of agricultural crops, forest crops and livestock, or land which has
been rezoned or converted, or proposed to be rezoned or converted, at the request of the
owner or previous owner, from an agricultural to a residentially, commercially or
industrially zoned district or use.
Page 262 of 295
15
C. Nonresidential uses which are located over 100 feet from, and are not adjacent to, R, R-
MF or R-TH Districts, or any property used for residential purposes, schools, child care
centers, playgrounds, shopping centers, libraries, hospitals, public institutions or similar
facilities shall be exempt from the provisions of Section 19.1-550.
Sec. 19.1-527. Exemptions and Exceptions.
A. Exemptions. Public utilities, railroads, public roads, and facilities exemptions.
1. Construction, installation, operation and maintenance of electric, natural gas, fiber-
optic and telephone transmission lines, railroads and public roads and their appurtenant
structures in accordance with the Erosion and Sediment Control Law (§62.1-44.15:51
et seq.), and the Stormwater Management Act (§62.1-44.15:24 et seq.), or an erosion
and sediment control plan and stormwater management plan approved by the Virginia
Department of Environmental Quality. The exemption of public roads is further
conditioned as follows: optimization of the road alignment and design, consistent with
other applicable requirements, to prevent or otherwise minimize encroachment in the
Resource Protection Area and adverse impacts on water quality.
2. Construction, installation and maintenance of water, sewer, natural gas, and
underground telecommunications and cable television lines owned, permitted, or both,
by the county or a regional service authority shall be exempt from this division's
requirements, provided that:
a. To the degree possible, the location of such utilities and facilities should be outside
resource protection areas.
b. No more land than necessary shall be disturbed to provide for the proposed utility
installation.
c. All construction, installation and maintenance of such utilities and facilities shall
be in compliance with any applicable federal, state and local requirements and
permits and designed and conducted in a manner that protects water quality.
d. Any land disturbance exceeding an area of 2,500 square feet shall comply with all
erosion and sediment control requirements of chapter 8 of this code.
B. Exceptions.
1. Findings. Exceptions to the requirements of Sections 19.1-524. and 19.1-525. may be
granted, subject to the procedures set forth in 19.1-527.B.2. if a finding is made that:
a. The requested exception is the minimum necessary to afford relief.
Page 263 of 295
16
b. Granting the exception shall not confer any special privileges upon the applicant
that are denied by this division to other property owners who are subject to its
provisions and who are similarly situated.
c. The exception is in harmony with the purpose and intent of this division and will
not result in a substantial detriment to water quality.
d. The exception request is not based on conditions or circumstances that are
self-created or self-imposed.
e. Reasonable and appropriate conditions are imposed, as warranted, that will ensure
that the permitted activity will not cause a degradation of water quality.
f. The request is being made because of the particular physical surroundings, use,
shape or topographical conditions of the specific property involved or property
adjacent to or within 100 feet of the subject property, or a particular hardship to the
owner will occur, as distinguished from a mere inconvenience, if the strict letter of
this division is carried out.
2. Exception process.
a. Exceptions to Requirements of Section19.1-524.
1) A request for an exception to the requirements of Section 19.1-524., except for
an encroachment permitted under Section 19.1-524.D., shall be made in writing
to the planning department for action by the board of supervisors. It shall
identify the impact of the proposed exception on water quality, on public safety
and on lands within the resource protection area through development of a water
quality impact assessment which complies with Section 19.1-524.E. Exception
requests seeking relief from the best management practice facility safety
measures and design criteria required in Sections 19.1-550. and 19.1-551. shall
not require the completion of a water quality impact assessment if the request
is supported by documentation which demonstrates that the request will not be
detrimental to public safety and welfare.
2) The planning department shall notify the affected public of any such exception
requests and the board of supervisors shall consider these requests during a
public hearing in accordance with Va. Code § 15.2-2204, except that only one
hearing shall be required.
3) The board of supervisors shall review the request for an exception and the water
quality impact assessment and may grant the exception with such conditions
and safeguards as deemed necessary to further the purpose and intent of this
division only if the board makes the findings set forth in Section 19.1-527.B.1.
Page 264 of 295
17
4) If the board of supervisors cannot make the required findings or refuses to grant
the exception, it shall return the request for an exception together with the water
quality impact assessment and the written findings and rationale for the decision
to the applicant.
b. Exceptions to the Requirements of Section 19.1-525. Upon written request, the
director of environmental engineering may approve exceptions to the requirements
of Section 19.1-525 when the director finds that the criteria of Section 19.1-
527.B.1. have been satisfied.
Sec. 19.1-528. Improvement Sketches.
A. Uses Requiring Improvement Sketch. Except as provided in Section 19.1-544., an
improvement sketch shall be submitted and approved for any use in a Chesapeake Bay
preservation area which exceeds 2,500 square feet of land disturbance and for which
neither site plan nor subdivision approval is required.
B. Preparation and Submission of Improvement Sketch.
1. Requests for improvement sketch review and approval shall be accompanied by:
a. The applicant's certification that he will perform the measures included on the
improvement sketch; and
b. Copies of the improvement sketch, as required by the director of environmental
engineering.
For any land use or development described in Section 19.1-528.A. requiring a building
permit, the building permit application shall be accompanied by an improvement sketch
for review and approval. The applicant's signature on the building permit application
shall constitute his certification that he will perform the measures included on the
approved improvement sketch. For any other land use or development, the
improvement sketch shall be submitted directly to the department of environmental
engineering for review and approval.
2. When necessary and applicable, as determined by the director of environmental
engineering, every improvement sketch shall be prepared in the following manner and
show the following information:
o The boundary of the entire tract by metes and bounds;
o Parking areas and driveways;
o Recreation areas, common areas and open space;
o The area of the entire tract and impervious areas;
o Building restriction lines, including Chesapeake Bay preservation areas,
existing and proposed utility easements, and required setbacks;
Page 265 of 295
18
o Existing and finished topography with a maximum of five-foot contour
intervals;
o Storm drainage systems including natural and artificial watercourses;
o All existing and/or proposed improvements, including wells and primary and
secondary drainfields;
o The limits of any established 100 year floodplains and the location of mapped
dam break inundation zones;
o All buildings and structures;
o The limits of land disturbance;
o All erosion control measures;
o Pollutant removal requirement calculations; and
o Best management practices satisfying pollutant loading requirements.
3. The director of environmental engineering shall review the improvement sketch for
general completeness and compliance with the regulations and requirements of this
division.
C. Improvement Sketch Processing.
1. The director of environmental engineering shall approve or disapprove an improvement
sketch in accordance with the regulations and requirements of this division within 30
days of the improvement sketch's submission date, if practicable. Such approval or
disapproval by the director of environmental engineering may include approval or
disapproval of the building permit application.
2. Any person aggrieved by the director of environmental engineering's decision
approving or disapproving an improvement sketch may appeal such decision in
accordance with Section 19.1-29.C.
D. Period of Improvement Sketch Validity. An approved improvement sketch shall become
null and void if no significant work is done or development is made on the site within six
months after final approval. There shall be no clearing or grading of any site without
approval of an improvement sketch by the director of environmental engineering.
E. Minor or Major Adjustment in Approved Improvement Sketch.
1. After an improvement sketch has been approved, minor adjustments to the sketch
which comply with the purpose of this division and other provisions of this chapter
may be approved by the director of environmental engineering. Deviation from an
approved improvement sketch without the director of environmental engineering's
written approval shall void the sketch, and the applicant shall be required to submit a
new improvement sketch.
2. Any major revision to an approved improvement sketch shall be made in the same
manner as originally approved. For these revisions, the director of environmental
Page 266 of 295
19
engineering may waive any requirements of this division that he finds to be unnecessary
to insure compliance with this division's requirements.
F. Development to be in Accordance with Improvement Sketch; Prerequisite to Issuing
Building Permit.
1. It shall be unlawful for any person to develop, change, or improve any land or construct,
erect or structurally alter any building or structure for which an improvement sketch is
required, except in accordance with an approved improvement sketch.
2. No building permit shall be issued to construct, erect or structurally alter any building
or structure that is subject to the provisions of this division until an improvement sketch
has been submitted and approved.
Sec. 19.1-529. Nonconforming Uses, Vested Rights and Other Exceptions.
A. In addition to the requirements of this chapter, no use which is nonconforming to the
requirements of this division and located in a Chesapeake Bay preservation area, shall be
enlarged, extended, reconstructed, substituted or structurally altered unless the director of
environmental engineering grants an exception pursuant to Section 19.1-527, and also finds
that:
1. There will be no net increase in the nonpoint source pollution load; and
2. Any development or land disturbance exceeding an area of 2,500 square feet complies
with all erosion and sediment control requirements of Chapter 8 of this code.
This exception for nonconforming uses is not available for the expansion of accessory
structures.
B. This division shall not be construed to prevent the reconstruction of pre-existing structures,
including accessory structures within Chesapeake Bay Preservation Areas from occurring
as a result of casualty loss, unless otherwise restricted by applicable ordinance.
C. The provisions of this division shall not affect the vested rights of any landowner under
existing law.
D. The provisions of this division shall not be construed to require or allow the taking of
private property for public use without just compensation.
OOO
Page 267 of 295
20
Sec. 19.1-570. Definitions
Adaptation measure: A project, practice, or approach to mitigate or address an impact of
climate change including sea-level rise, storm surge, and flooding including increased or
recurrent flooding.
OOO
Canopy tree: A tree that typically reaches 35 feet in height or taller when mature.
OOO
Mature tree: A canopy tree with a diameter at breast height (DBH) of 12 inches or greater
or an understory tree with a DBH of four (4) inches or greater.
OOO
Storm surge: The resulting temporary rise in sea level due to the action of wind stress on the
water surface and low atmospheric pressure created during storms which can cause coastal
flooding. Surge is the difference from expected tide level. Storm tide is the total water level. The
Category 3 National Hurricane Center Storm Surge Risk Map shall be used for Resiliency
Assessments.
OOO
Understory tree: A tree that typically reaches 12 to 35 feet in height when mature.
OOO
(2) That this ordinance shall become effective immediately upon adoption.
133634.2
Page 268 of 295
Code Amendment –Chesapeake Bay Preservation Areas
•Mature Tree Preservation
•Climate Resiliency
•Resiliency Assessment for RPA –
Tidal Zones, Storm Surge, Floodplains
•Definitions
Page 269 of 295
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Meeting Date: October 30, 2024 Item Number: 18.B.
Subject:
To Consider an Ordinance to Amend the Zoning Ordinance Relative to Public Notice
Board Action Requested:
Approve updates to the Zoning Ordinance Regarding Public Notice.
Summary of Information:
The General Assembly passed an amendment to Code of Virginia § 15.2-2204 regarding public notice of various planning
matters requiring public hearings. The specific changes affect the publish date of the newspaper advertisements. Accordingly,
Chesterfield County must update its zoning ordinance to incorporate those changes.
Attachments:
1. Ordinance to Amend 19.1-42 regarding public notice 2024
2. Staff Presentation
Preparer: Thomas Jenkins, Zoning Administrator
Approved By:
Page 270 of 295
AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE CODE OF THE COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD, 1997,
AS AMENDED, BY AMENDING AND REENACTING SECTION 19.1-42 OF THE
ZONING ORDINANCE RELATIVE TO PUBLIC NOTICE
BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County:
(1) That Section 19.1-42 of the Code of the County of Chesterfield, 1997, as amended, is amended
and re-enacted, to read as follows:
Chapter 19.1
ZONING
OOO
Sec. 19.1-42. Notices and Posting.
A. Notice Generally and Contents of Notice. Unless otherwise stated in this chapter, the
planning department shall prepare a notice for each zoning approval, appeal of the planning
director’s decision, interpretation of a zoning district map, historic district or designation
of historic district or landmark sites, comprehensive plan amendment, ordinance
amendment, schematic plan, administrative site plan, or planning commission site plan.
The notice for the proposal shall identify the place or places within the locality where
copies of the proposal may be examined. No land may be zoned to a more intensive use
classification than was contained in the proposal made available for examination. Such
notices shall specify the time and place of any hearing at which persons affected may
appear and present their views.
For all applications, the notice shall include the land use and density, if any, recommended
in the comprehensive plan. For any application that includes a residential land use, the
notice shall include the proposed density and/or maximum number of dwelling units.
For administrative variances, the notice shall also state that the planning director will
approve or disapprove the application no sooner than 21 days of the postmarked date of
notice and advise the recipient of the opportunity to respond in writing to the application
prior to the expiration of the 21 days.
B. Newspaper. Notice of a hearing for the following proposals shall be advertised twice
once a week for two successive weeks in a newspaper published, or having general
circulation, in the county, with the first notice appearing no more than 28 14 days before
and the second notice appearing no less than seven days before the date of the meeting
referenced in the noticeintended adoption.
• zoning approval or zoning district map amendment;
• ordinance or amendment thereto;
• appeal of decision of the director of planning to the board of zoning appeals;
Page 271 of 295
2
• interpretation of the zoning map by the board of zoning appeals;
• comprehensive plan amendment; or
• a historic district or designation of landmark or landmark site.
For any proposed amendment of the zoning ordinance involving a change in zoning map
classification of 250 or fewer lots of land, or a change in the applicable zoning ordinance
text regulations that decreases the allowed density of any lot of land, the newspaper
advertisement shall include the street address or the tax map parcel number of the lots, the
approximate acreage subject to the action, and a link to a map of the subject area.
For any proposed amendment of the zoning ordinance involving a change in zoning map
classification of more than 250 lots of land, the newspaper advertisement shall include the
approximate acreage subject to the action, a description of the boundaries of the area
subject to the changes, and a link to a map of the subject area.
C. [RESERVED]
D. Posting of Property. The planning department shall post a notice of the application on the
land or building involved for each application for zoning approval, appeal of the planning
director’s decision, schematic plan, administrative site plan, or planning commission site
plan. The notice shall be posted at reasonable intervals along roads abutting the area subject
to the zoning request, or, if there is no abutting road, at the proposed road or entrance into
the area subject to the zoning request, in locations reasonably visible from existing roads.
The holding of a public hearing or the validity of action on an application shall not be
affected by the unauthorized removal of a notice which has been posted in accordance with
this section. Postings shall meet the following deadlines:
1. Administrative Site Plans. Posting shall occur at least 10 days prior to the approval
or disapproval of an administrative site plan; and
2. Administrative Variances. Posting shall occur at least 14 days prior to the approval
or disapproval of an administrative variance.
3. All Other Applications. Posting shall occur at least 21 days before the date of the first
hearing.
E. Notice to Subject Property Owners, Adjacent Property Owners and Specific Others.
1. Notice Recipients. For properties located within the county, staff will obtain the names
and addresses of property owners from the department of real estate assessments. For
property which lies outside the county, the applicant shall provide the planning
department with the names and addresses of those property owners which shall be
obtained from the real estate assessor’s office of the applicable locality.
Page 272 of 295
3
a. Zoning Approval, Appeal of the Decision of the Director of Planning, Historic
District or Landmark Designation, Schematic Plan, Administrative Site Plan or
Planning Commission Site Plan Applications. The planning department shall
provide written notification of these applications to the following:
• the owner of the subject property;
• except for Zoning Approvals involving a change in zoning map classification
of more than 250 existing lots, persons owning any adjacent property, including
property across any road, railroad right-of-way, or body of water;
• if the subject property is located at, or within 100 feet of, the intersection of any
2 or more roads or within 100 feet of the intersection of the right-of-way of any
2 railroads, the owners of property situated at all corners of the intersection;
• if the subject property is located within 0.5 miles of the boundary of an
adjoining locality, that locality’s chief administrative officer or designee;
• if the subject property is located within 3,000 feet of the boundary of a military
base, installation, airport, excluding armories operated by the Virginia National
Guard, the commander of the applicable military operation; and
• if the subject property is located within 3,000 feet of the boundary of a public
use airport, the owner of the airport.
b. Amendment to Condition of Zoning, Conditional Use, or Conditional Use Planned
Development. In addition to those persons outlined in 1.a., the planning department
shall notify in writing all owners whose property was subject to the original zoning
or condition provided such property is located within 1,500 feet of the subject
property.
c. Zoning Approval. In addition to those persons outlined in 1.a. and 1.b., if the
subject property is located within a development containing open space, the
planning department shall notify in writing any incorporated property owner’s
association within the development.
d. Zoning Ordinance Text Amendments Decreasing Allowable Density. Except for
the owners of subdivision lots having less than 11,500 square feet, the planning
department shall notify, in writing, the owners of property which may be impacted
by a zoning ordinance text amendment that would decrease the allowable dwelling
unit density of their lot.
e. Zoning Approval for a Communications Tower. In addition to those persons
outlined in 1.a., 1.b. and 1.c., the planning department shall notify in writing all
owners of property within 1,500 feet of the subject property.
f. Comprehensive Plan Amendments. The planning department shall provide written
notice of a proposed comprehensive plan amendment to the following:
Page 273 of 295
4
• if the proposed amendment impacts property within 0.5 mile of the boundary
of an adjacent locality, that locality’s chief administrative officer or designee;
• if the subject property is within 3,000 feet of the boundary of a military base,
installation, airport, excluding armories operated by the Virginia National
Guard, the commander of the applicable military operation; and
• if the subject property is within 3,000 feet of the boundary of a public use
airport, the owner of the airport;
• if the proposed amendment designates or alters previously designated corridors
or routes for electric transmission lines of 150 kilovolts or more, each electric
utility with a certificated service territory that includes all or any part of such
designated electric transmission corridors or routes.
2. Notice Deadline.
a. For those applications requiring notice to commanders of military operations or
owners of public use airports, the notice shall be postmarked a minimum of 30 days
before any hearing.
b. For those applications requiring notice to an electric utility or an adjacent locality’s
chief administrative officer or designee, the notice shall be postmarked a minimum
of 10 days before any hearing.
c. Administrative site plan and planning commission site plan notices shall be
postmarked a minimum of 10 days prior to approval or disapproval of the plan.
d. Schematic plan notices shall be postmarked a minimum of 21 days before any
hearing.
e. Administrative variance notices shall be postmarked a minimum of 21 days prior
to approval or disapproval of the variance.
f. All other required notices shall be postmarked a minimum of 5 business days before
any hearing.
3. Notice Mailing. The required notice shall be sent by registered, certified or first class
mail. If the notice is provided by first class mail, the planning department shall make
affidavit that the mailings were made and file the affidavit with the papers of the case.
If a public hearing is continued or deferred to a date that has not previously been
advertised, notice shall be re-mailed. If a public hearing is either continued, deferred to
a date that has been previously advertised, or if a public hearing is closed and the
decision deferred to a later date, notice shall not be required to be re-mailed.
4. Waiver of Notice. A person shall be deemed to have waived the right to challenge the
validity of proceedings for which written notice is required if the person did not receive
the required notice, but had actual notice of, or actively participated in, the proceedings.
Page 274 of 295
5
OOO
(2) That this ordinance shall become effective immediately upon adoption.
133632.1
Page 275 of 295
Code Amendment Relative to Public NoticeOctober 30, 2024
Page 276 of 295
Proposed Changes
B.Newspaper. Notice of a hearing for the following proposals shall
be advertised twice once a week for two successive weeks in a
newspaper published, or having general circulation, in the
county, with the first notice appearing no more than 28 14 days
before and the second notice appearing no less than seven days
before the date of the meeting referenced in the notice intended
adoption.
Page 277 of 295
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 1 2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19
CPC
HEARING
20 21 22 23
Newspaper advertisement date
Current advertising requirements
1st
newspaper
ad
2nd
newspaper
ad
DECEMBER
NOVEMBER
1st ad may
appear no
earlier than
this date Ads in two successive weeks
First ad is no more than 14 days prior to hearing
Page 278 of 295
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 1 2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19
CPC
HEARING
20 21 22 23
Newspaper advertisement date
proposed advertising requirements
1st
newspaper
ad
2nd ad
First ad is no more than 28 days prior to hearing
Second ad is no less than 7 days before hearing date
1st ad must
appear no
earlier than
this date
2nd ad must
appear no
later than
this date
DECEMBER
NOVEMBER
Two advertisements, not required to be in successive weeks
Page 279 of 295
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Meeting Date: October 30, 2024 Item Number: 18.C.
Subject:
To Consider an Ordinance to Amend the Zoning Ordinance Relative to Vested Rights and Nonconforming
Uses
Board Action Requested:
Approve updates to the Zoning Ordinance Regarding Vested Rights and Nonconforming Uses
Summary of Information:
The General Assembly passed an amendment to Code of Virginia § 15.2-2307 regarding vested rights and
nonconforming uses. The specific changes expand the criteria used to determine the conforming and
nonconforming status of a building or structure, specifically when a property owner incurs substantial
obligations or expenses in good faith reliance on the issuance of a building permit. Accordingly, Chesterfield
County must update its zoning ordinance to incorporate this change.
Attachments:
1. Ordinance to amend 19.1-3 regarding vested rights & nonconforming uses
2. Staff Presentation
Preparer: Thomas Jenkins, Zoning Administrator
Approved By:
Page 280 of 295
AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE CODE OF THE COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD, 1997,
AS AMENDED, BY AMENDING AND REENACTING SECTION 19.1-3 OF THE ZONING
ORDINANCE RELATIVE TO VESTED RIGHTS AND NONCONFORMING USES
BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County:
(1) That Section 19.1-3 of the Code of the County of Chesterfield, 1997, as amended, is amended
and re-enacted, to read as follows:
Chapter 19.1
ZONING
OOO
Sec. 19.1-3. Nonconforming Uses, Buildings and Structures--Excluding Signs.
A. Generally. Except as otherwise provided in this chapter, any lawful use, building or
structure existing at the time of an amendment of this chapter may be continued even
though such use, building or structure may not conform to this chapter's provisions and
shall be deemed nonconforming. A change in occupancy or ownership shall not affect the
right for the use to continue or the building or structure to remain. A building permit,
conditional use or special exception lawfully granted before June 24, 2015 shall not be
affected by this provision.
B. Enlargement, Extension, Reconstruction, Substitution or Structural Alteration of
Nonconforming Use. Except where otherwise provided, a nonconforming use, building or
structure shall not be enlarged, extended, reconstructed, substituted or structurally altered
except when required by law or lawful order or as follows:
1. The use is changed to a use permitted in the district in which it is located;
2. A nonconforming use may be extended throughout any part of a building or structure
which was arranged or designed for the use on or before June 24, 2015, provided there
are no structural alterations, expansion or enlargement except those required by law or
lawful order;
3. A building or structure that is conforming as to use, but is nonconforming as to the
requirements of this chapter, including floor area, lot, yard, road frontage, distance,
parking, loading spaces, fences, signs or height requirements may only be enlarged or
structurally altered if the alteration or enlargement complies with this chapter;
4. A nonconforming use which has ceased for more than 2 years shall not again be used
for a nonconforming use;
5. A nonconforming use may be changed to another use permitted within the same zoning
district where the nonconforming use is first permitted or to a use first permitted in a
less intense zoning district; however, if the use is changed to one which is first
Page 281 of 295
2
permitted in a less intense zoning district, it shall not later be changed back to a use that
is first permitted in the more intense district; and
6. Additionally, a nonconforming building or structure shall include those circumstances
where the county has:
• a. The county has issued a building permit or other permit authorizing
construction and the building or structure was constructed in accordance with
the building permit, and upon completion, the County issued a certificate of
occupancy; or
• b. a property owner, relying in good faith on the issuance of a building permit,
incurs extensive obligations or substantial expenses in diligent pursuit of a
building project that is in conformance with the building permit and the
Uniform Statewide Building Code (§ 36-97 et seq.); or
• c. the owner of the building or structure has paid real estate taxes to the County
for such building or structure for a period of more than the previous 15 years.
Any such building or structure may be brought into compliance with the Uniform
Statewide Building Code without affecting the nonconforming status of the building or
structure.
7. Additionally, a nonconforming building or structure shall include those circumstances
where:
• a. a permit was not required and an authorized governmental official informed
the property owner that the structure would comply with the zoning ordinance;
and
• b. the improvements were then constructed accordingly.
In any proceeding when the authorized county official is deceased or unavailable to
testify, uncorroborated testimony of the oral statement of such official shall not be
sufficient evidence to prove that the authorized county official made such statement.
8. A nonconforming building or structure may be repaired, rebuilt or replaced after being
damaged or destroyed by a natural disaster or other act of God or accidental fire
provided that:
• a. the nonconforming features are eliminated or reduced to the extent possible,
without the need to obtain a variance or other zoning approval;
• b. the requirements of the floodplain regulations of this chapter are met; and
Page 282 of 295
3
• c. the work is done within 2 years unless the building is in an area under a
federal disaster declaration and was damaged or destroyed as a direct result of
the disaster, in which case the time period shall be extended to 4 years.
For purposes of this section, "act of God" shall include any natural disaster or
phenomena including a hurricane, tornado, storm, flood, high water, wind-driven
water, tidal wave, earthquake or fire caused by lightning or wildfire. Nothing herein
shall be construed to enable the property owner to commit an arson under the Code of
Virginia and obtain vested rights under this section.
9. A nonconforming manufactured home within a manufactured home park may be
replaced with another comparable manufactured home that meets the HUD
manufactured housing code. In such circumstances, a single-section home may replace
a single-section home and a multi-section home may replace a multi-section home. A
nonconforming manufactured home located on an individual lot may be replaced with
a newer manufactured home, either single- or multi-section, that meets the HUD
manufactured housing code.
OOO
(2) That this ordinance shall become effective immediately upon adoption.
133633.1
Page 283 of 295
Code Amendment Relative to Vested Rights and Nonconforming UsesOctober 30, 2024
Page 284 of 295
Proposed Changes
6.Additionally, a nonconforming building or structure shall
include those circumstances where the county has:
a)The county has issued a building permit or other permit
authorizing construction and the building or structure was
constructed in accordance with the building permit, and upon
completion, the County issued a certificate of occupancy; or
b)a property owner, relying in good faith on the issuance of a
building permit, incurs extensive obligations or substantial
expenses in diligent pursuit of a building project that is in
conformance with the building permit and the Uniform
Statewide Building Code (§ 36-97 et seq.); or
c) the owner of the building or structure has paid real estate
taxes to the County for such building or structure for a period
of more than the previous 15 years.
Page 285 of 295
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Meeting Date: October 30, 2024 Item Number: 18.D.
Subject:
To Consider Continuation of Lease of Henricus Historical Park with the Henricus Foundation
Board Action Requested:
Hold public hearing and approve staff's execution of lease.
Summary of Information:
In 1993, the County and the Henricus Foundation (Foundation) entered into a Memorandum of Understanding
for the development and operation of Henricus Historical Park. In 2012, the County granted a leasehold interest
to the Foundation that expired on September 1, 2015. The lease was subsequently renewed and the term, as
well as all available extensions, have been exercised. Thus, a new lease is required.
Terms of the lease remain unchanged. This update allows for a ten-year term with the option to extend for an
additional ten years and the ability for either party to terminate with a one-year written notice.
Day-to-day operating responsibilities of the County and the Foundation are detailed in a separate community
contract agreement.
The Foundation is in agreement with the terms.
Attachments:
1. Lease Agreement - Henricus 2024-final
2. Advertising Affidavit
Preparer: Clay Bowles, Deputy County Administrator, Community
Operations
Approved By:
Page 286 of 295
0623:87416.1 1
LEASE AGREEMENT
THIS LEASE AGREEMENT (the "Lease") is made and entered into this ____ day of
______________, 2024, by and between the COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD, VIRGINIA
("County") and HENRICUS FOUNDATION (the "Foundation").
W I T N E S S E T H
WHEREAS, County owns land adjacent to the James River located in the County of
Chesterfield and the County of Henrico, known as Henricus Historical Park (“Henricus”); and
WHEREAS, the Foundation is a non-profit corporation established to generate public
interest in, and act to preserve, restore, reconstruct or otherwise maintain historical structures,
objects, works of art and locations, and to promote, encourage and carry on any historical,
interpretive, research or educational activities relating to the site of the “Citie of Henricus”; and
WHEREAS, County and the Foundation entered into a Memorandum of Understanding
dated July 28, 1993, a License Agreement dated August 5, 1996, an Operating Agreement
Concerning Henricus Historical Park dated September 1, 2015 (“Operating Agreement”), and an
Operating Agreement and Community Contract (“Community Contract”) dated
_____________________ all of which together memorialize and further delineate the parties’
intent to jointly develop and operate Henricus; and
WHEREAS, the Foundation has constructed a visitor’s center, an education center, and
made other capital improvements at Henricus, in addition to overseeing construction of several
other capital improvements at Henricus, all of which have become the property of the County;
and
WHEREAS, the Foundation, pursuant to agreements with the County, has primary
responsibility for operation of Henricus, pursuant to the agreed upon Community Contract; and
Page 287 of 295
0623:87416.1 2
WHEREAS, the Foundation has requested that the County grant it a leasehold interest in
Henricus, and the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors has determined, after a public
hearing, that granting the Foundation a leasehold interest in Henricus is in the public’s best
interests;
NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the mutual undertaking of the parties
contained herein, the County and the Foundation hereby covenant and agree, each with the other,
as follows:
1. Grant. The County hereby grants and conveys to the Foundation a leasehold
interest in the land and improvements known as Henricus Historical Park as delineated and
described specifically in Exhibit A excluding the property, if any, which may be owned by the
County of Henrico and the City of Richmond. The County will charge the Foundation no rent
for the Lease. In consideration of the Lease, the Foundation shall, for and on behalf of the
County, manage, maintain, operate, and improve Henricus for the use and pleasure of the citizens
of the County and all other interested persons upon the terms and conditions contained herein
and in accordance with the terms of the Community Contract which is hereby incorporated by
reference and attached as Exhibit B.
2. Term. The initial term of this Lease shall be for ten (10) years commencing on
November 1, 2024, and ending October 31, 2033 and shall automatically renew for one
additional term of ten (10) years unless terminated by either party with at least one (1) year
written notice.
3. General Provisions.
a. This Lease is not assignable by the Foundation without the prior written
consent of the County.
Page 288 of 295
0623:87416.1 3
b. The provisions of this Lease are severable; the invalidity of any provision
hereof shall not affect the validity of any other provision contained in this Lease.
c. This Lease may be simultaneously executed in two or more counterparts,
each of which shall be an original and all of which shall constitute but one and the same
instrument.
d. All notices shall be given in writing as follows:
If to Chesterfield County:
County Administrator
9901 Lori Road
Room 500
Chesterfield, Virginia 23832
If to the Foundation: George Drumwright, Chair
The Henricus Foundation
251 Henricus Park Road
Chesterfield, Virginia 23832
Witness the following signatures.
Page 289 of 295
0623:87416.1 4
COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD, VIRGINIA
By: ____________________________________
Date: ________________ Clay Bowles
Deputy County Administrator
Commonwealth of Virginia,
County of Chesterfield, to-wit:
I, ___________________________, a Notary Public in and for the County and State
aforesaid, do hereby certify that this day personally appeared before me in my jurisdiction
aforesaid ______________________________, for the County of Chesterfield, Virginia, whose
name is signed to the foregoing writing and acknowledged the same before me.
Given under my hand _________________________, 2024.
My commission expires:____________________________.
Registration Number: ______________________________.
__________________________________
NOTARY PUBLIC
The HENRICUS FOUNDATION
By: ____________________________________
Date: ________________ George Drumwright, Chair
Commonwealth of Virginia,
City/County of _____________________, to-wit:
I, ___________________________, a Notary Public in and for the City/County and State
aforesaid, do hereby certify that this day personally appeared before me in my jurisdiction
aforesaid, for The Henricus Foundation, whose name is signed to the foregoing writing and
acknowledged the same before me.
Given under my hand _________________________, 2024.
My commission expires:____________________________.
Registration Number: ______________________________.
__________________________________
NOTARY PUBLIC
Page 290 of 295
Lease of Henricus Historical Park - Page 1 of 2
[def:$signername|printname|req|signer1] [def:$signersig|sig|req|signer1] [def:$notarysig|sig|req|notary] [def:$date|date|req|notary] [def:$state|state|req|notary] [def:$county|county|req|notary] [def:$disclosure|disclosure|req|notary] [def:$seal|seal|req|notary]
AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION
State of Florida, County of Orange, ss:
Benjamin Revier, being first duly sworn, deposes and says: That
(s)he is a duly authorized signatory of Column Software, PBC, duly
authorized agent of Richmond Times Dispatch, a newspaper printed
and published in the City of Richmond, State of Virginia, and that
this affidavit is Page 1 of 2 with the full text of the sworn-to notice
set forth on the pages that follow, and the hereto attached:
PUBLICATION DATES:
Oct. 16, 2024, Oct. 23, 2024
NOTICE ID: J7c1uM1tzymamQAumseh
PUBLISHER ID: COL-7002569
NOTICE NAME: Lease of Henricus Historical Park
Publication Fee: 765.37
Ad Size: 2 X 34 L
Category: General Legal Notice
Under penalty of perjury, I, the undersigned affiant swear or affirm
that the statements above are true and accurate to the best of my
knowledge and belief.
[$signersig ]
(Signed)______________________________________ [$seal]
VERIFICATION
State of Florida
County of Orange
Subscribed in my presence and sworn to before me on this: [$date]
[$notarysig ]
______________________________
Notary Public
[$disclosure]
See Proof on Next Page
10/23/2024
Notarized remotely online using communication technology via Proof.
Page 291 of 295
Lease of Henricus Historical Park - Page 2 of 2
Page 292 of 295
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Meeting Date: October 30, 2024 Item Number: 18.E.
Subject:
To Consider the Lease of County Property Adjacent to the Meadowville Wastewater Pump Station at 1398
Bermuda Hundred Road
Board Action Requested:
The Board is requested to approve the lease of county property adjacent to the Meadowville Wastewater Pump
Station at 1398 Bermuda Hundred Road to American Tower.
Summary of Information:
Prior to the acquisition of property adjacent to the Meadowville Wastewater Pump Station, American Tower
constructed a tower on the site pursuant to a lease with the previous owner, Meadowville, LLC. American
Tower would like to maintain the tower at this location and has negotiated a new lease with the county. The
lease will be for five years with the first years rent being $28,800. Rent will increase 3% annually during the
initial term and the 5 five-year renewal terms. In addition, American Tower will pay the county a signing
bonus of $10,000 and collocation revenue of $200 per month for any additional carriers that collocate on the
tower. A public hearing is required to lease county property.
Approval is recommended.
Attachments:
1. Bermuda Hundred Road Tower Site Vicinity Sketch
Preparer: Lynn Snow, Real Property Manager
Approved By:
Page 293 of 295
N
I
-
2
9
5
S
I
-
2
9
5
I-
2
9
5
R
P
DI
G
I
T
A
L
D
R
BERMUDA HU
N
D
R
E
D
R
D
M E A D O W V I L L E T E C H P K W Y
N ENON
C
H
U
R
C
H
R
D
E
H
U
N
D
R
E
D
R
D
I-
2
9
5
R
P
N E N O N C H U R C H
R D
I -2 9 5 R P
Board of Supervisors Meeting - October 30, 2024To Consider a Lease of County Property Adjacent to theMeadowville Wastewater Pump Station at 1398 Bermuda Hundred Road
Chesterfield CountyReal Property Office
1 inch = 500 feet
µ
Bermuda Hundred Road Tower Site
Page 294 of 295
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Meeting Date: October 30, 2024 Item Number: 20.A.
Subject:
Adjournment and Notice of Next Scheduled Meeting of the Board of Supervisors
Board Action Requested:
Summary of Information:
Motion of adjournment and notice of Board of Supervisors' meeting at the Chesterfield Chamber Legislative
Breakfast on November 7, 2024, at 8:30 a.m. at Virginia State University, to then adjourn to the Powhite
Parkway Project Environmental Impact Statement Public Information Meeting on November 7, 2024, at 5:30
p.m. at Chesterfield Career and Technical Center, Hull Street Campus, to then adjourn to the regularly
scheduled Board of Supervisors' meeting on November 13, 2024, at 2 p.m. in Room 502 of the County
Administration Building.
Attachments:
None
Preparer: Susan Wilson, Clerk to the Board of Supervisors
Approved By:
Page 295 of 295