Loading...
93SN0196 ~ ' . ''\. , . . .'.1a) 18, 1993 CPC june23,19938S REQUEST ANALYSIS AND R.ECOMMENDATION 93SN0196 Jim Andelin MatoacaMagi5terialDistrict We5t line 01 8eaver Bridge Road REOUEST: Conditional Use Planned Development to permit indoor/outdoor recreational facilities lor a public zoo in an Agricultural (A) District with exception to paving requirements for driveways and parking areas. PROPOSW LAND USE: A public zoo with a gift shop,concessiOrl facillties and other3ccessoryuses isplanrled. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENOA nON RECOMMEND APPROVAL SUBJECT TO THE CONDITIONS AND ACCEPTANCE OF THE PROFFERED CONDITION ON PAGE 2. STAfF RECOMMENDATION Re<:ommendapproval for the following reasons: A. The proposed zoning and land use generally conforms with the Western Area land Use and Transoortation Plan, which desigrlate; the property and surrounding area for agricuitural/forestal use. In addition, the proposed Southem and Westem Area Plan. as approved by the Plarlning Commission, designates the area as a rural conservation area. The proposed land use generally confOrms to the adopted and proposed plans. Both the adopted and proposed plans anticipate minimal development in thearea forthe foreseeable future. Therefore, the use should not impact development in the near fllture. B. The conditions recommended herein and the proffered condition address treatment and delineation of parking areas and driveways, to insure ease 01 ingress and egress while maintairling the agricultural character of tl1earea; limited siglklge; and transportaUon improvements to minimize tl1e impact on the public road ,yslem. (NOTE: CONDITIONS MAY BE IMPOSED OR THE PROPERTY OWNER MAY PROFFER CONDITIONS_ THE CONDITIONS NOTED WITH "$TAFF/CPC" WERE AGREED UPON 8Y BOTH STAFF AND THE COMMISSION. CONDITiONS WITH ONLY A "STAFF" AR.E RECOMMENDED SOLELY BY STAFF. CONDITIONS WITH ONLY A "CPC' ARE ADDITiONAL CONDITIONS RECOII.WENDED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION.) CONDITIONS (STAff/CPO 1. (sTAFF/CPQ 2. (STAFF/CPC) 3. (STAFF/CPQ 4. (STAFF/CPO 5. Driveways and parking areas ,hall comply with Section 21.'-219 (d) (}) and (4) of the Zoning Ordinilnce relat"rve to surface treatment and delineationof,uchareas. (P) The applicant 5hall provide sufficient parking to accommodate the demands of the I.lse. If it is determined that insufficient parking exists to meet the use demands, additional parking shall be provided, as deemed necessary by the Planning Department. (Pl On-site signs shall be as permitted lor any club, church, school, or other public or semi-public: institution located along a major arterial. (PI A second pond shall be constructed downstream of any ponds or lakes utilized for waterfowl grazing or which receive runoff Irom other animal impoundment areas so as to control the impact on water quality downstream. (E) Prior to issuanceofa buildingpermit,theowrrer/developershillls ubmit a security plan to the Planning Commission for approval. (CPO PROFFERED CONDITION (STAfF/CPC) location: Prior to site plan approval, forty-five (45) feet of right of way on the west side of Beaver Bridge Road measured from the centerline of that part of Beaver Bridge Road immediately adjacent to the property shall be dedicated, free and unrestricted, to and for the benefit of Cheslerf,eld County. GENERAL INfORMATION West line of Beaver Bridge Road, south of Huil Street Road. Tax Map 88 (1) Part of Parcel 10 (5heet 27). , . ;~ 2 93sN0196NJP!JUNE231 . . " . . Existing Zoning: A )jzg: 49.4 acres €xiSlin!:! Land Use: Vacant AdiacentZoning & Land Use: North -A; Public (sc:hool) or vacant South - A; Vacant East - A; 5ing!e family residential or vacant West - A; Vacant PU8L1C FACILITIES Utililies: The public water and wastewater systems are not available to the request site. HealthOeoanmel1t Asoil sdentlst must locate drainfield sites for the intended use to b e approved by the Health Department. All State and County codes must be met and the County Code would limit water usage to 3,000 gallons per day. This site is located in the Triassic Basin and getting an adequate slJpply of well water could be a problem. Prior to obtaining a building permit, a well must be dug and the well mU5t produce adequate water. Envlronmentll: Orainall'eand Ereslor'!: The request property drains to Sappony Creek and then south to the Appornattox River. No existing or anticipated on-oroff"site drainage or erosion problems. Itmay be necessary to acquire off-site easements io control runoff. However, on 49 acres of little impervious material" adequate outfalls should be available, A second drainage basin should be provided downstream of all ponds or lakes utilized for 3 93SN0196M'P!JUNE231 waterfowl grazing or which receive runoff from other animal impoundment areas so as to control the impact on downstream water quality. (Condition 4) Fire Service: Clover Hill Fire Station, Company iP. The proposed zoning and land uses will not generate additional need for fire protection services. Transoortltion: Traffic generation information is not available for the proposed use; a zoo. Traffic generated by this development will be dist(.buted along Beaver Bridge Road which had a 1990 traffic COUrlt of 495 vehicle; per day. The Thoroughfare Plan identifies Beaver Bridge Rood as a major arterial with a recommended right of way width of ninety (90) feet The applicant has proffered to dedicate forty-five (45) feet of right 0/ way measured from the centerline of Beaver Bridge Road in accordance with thatPlall, (Proffered Condition) The Virginia Department of Transportatiofl (VDOT) has indicated that the developer will be required to construct a commercial entrance onto Beaver Bridge Road. This request will not limit developmerlt to a specific density; therefore, it is difficult to determine mitigating rood improvements. At time of site plan review, specific recommendations will be provided regarding internal traffic circulation and mitigating road improvements which may include construction of adequate turn lanes. LANO USE General Plan; Lies within the boundaries of the Western Are.a land Use and Transoortation Plan. which designate, the property foragricu!turallforestal use. Thepropo>edSouthem and Western Area Piarl. as re<:Dmmended by the Planning CommiSSion designates the property as a rural conservation area wi!h uses limited primarilytoagr iculturaland forestal uses with isolated single family re,idencesor large parcels. Area DeveloomentTrends: Area property is characterized by single lamlly residences along Beave r Bridge Road and larger vacant tracts adjacent to the subject property, all zoned Agricultural (A). Property to the north, along Route 360, is zOrled agriculturally and occupied by Grange Hall School. , 93SN0196!WP!JUNE231 . . " . . Based Orl the adopted and proposed plans for the area, limited development is antidpated until adequate public facilities are available. Specifically, the plans suggestagrkultwral.typeuses in the foreseeable future. Therefore, the proposed use, which could be considered a semi-agriculturai.typeoperation, should have a minimal impacron anticipated land uses in the near future and generally conforms to the plans. Site Design: The proposed use is located approximately 1,200 feet off of Beaver Bridge Road,at its closest point on a wooded site. So as to il'lsure ease of il'lgress and egress while mail'lta;ning the agricultural character of the area, parking areas and driv ewaysshall be surfaced with a mirlimum of six (6) inches of #21 or #21A stone and be delineated bya permanent means. (Condition_1) Conclusions: The proposed zoning and land u.seconforms to the adopted Jrldproposed land use plans. As previously noted, both the adopted and proposed land use plans for the area suggest minimal area development. Further, both plans suggest agricultural-type uses. The use proposed generally conforms to this designation. The recommended conditions and proffered condition address surface treatment and delineation of parking areas and driveway-5, signage and transportation improvements. Therefore, approval 01 this request is recommended. CASE HISTORY Planning Commission Meeting (S/l B/93); The applicant accepted the recommendation. There was opposition present. Concems were expressed relative to traffic impact; security of animals; and potential vermin and noise problems. It was noted that staff had received one letter In support of the request. It was the consensus of the Commission that Condition 5 addressing security meaSures should also be imposed. On motion of Mr. Gulley, seconded by Mr. Easter, the Commission recommended approval of this request subject to the conditions and acceptance of the proffered condition on page 2. AYES; Messrs. Gulley, Easter, Cunningham and MlIler. 5 93sN0196M'P/]UNE231 A8SENT: Mr. Marsh. The 80<lrd of Supervisors on Wednesday, June 23, 1993, beginning at 7:00 p.m., will take under consideration this request. & 93SN0196fNP/Jl,INE231 . . J ~ ' II I~ '" N ~ A I ) \ :"",' -_..,....-;':' ( !\ A I , ,I I. I:k .. ,~ ) /' /-", , . N ~.:: ',,' . I I /0 , > ~ ) " , c 'G>l , , , / . / . """"" "",'"'~..." '''-' "e", ~4{'\. "'~ P Y(/ "" 'I j N / ~' ~, ) , , 1 , , v ) ) , .-- , o . /~." ~', ! ., l' ,~ "I:',5NO I %-!