02-27-2002 PacketCHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Page 1 of 1
Meetin~ Date: Februar}/27, 2002
Item Number: 5.A.
Subject:
Resolution Recognizing David P. Hope Upon His
Retirement
County Administrator's Comments:
County Administrator:
Board Action Requested:
The adoption of
Summary of Information:
Police Major David P.
having provided over
Chesterfield County.
the attached
Hope
25
resolution.
will retire from the Police Department
years of service to the citizens of
Preparer:
Lt. Colonel Dennis G. McDonald
Title:
Deputy Chief of Police
Attachments:
Ycs
No
00000~.
RECOGNIZING MAJOR DAVID P. HOPE UPON HIS RETIREMENT
WHEREAS, Major David P. Hope will retire from the Chesterfield
County Police Department on March 1, 2002 after providing over 25 years
of quality service to the citizens of Chesterfield County; and
WHEREAS, Major Hope has faithfully served the county in the capacity
of Patrol Officer, Investigator, Sergeant, Lieutenant, Captain, and
Major; and
WHEREAS, in 1977, Major Hope was selected as Police Officer of the
Year; and
WHEREAS, Major Hope was one of three co-founders and advisors of the
Law Enforcement Explorer Post 609, and has served as General Instructor,
Firearms Instructor and Driver Instructor.
WHEREAS, Major Hope graduated from the 194th class of the F.B.I.
National Academy; and
WHEREAS, Major Hope received a Chief's Commendation for the bravery
and professionalism exhibited by him during the apprehension of a suspect
who had fired upon him and others while they were attempting to capture
a suspect who had tried to run down an officer with a pick-up truck; and
WHEREAS, Major Hope was commended for the publication of the
"Physical Fitness Assessment and Education Plan of the Chesterfield County
Police Department" article that appeared in the January 1981 issue of The
Police Chief Magazine; and
WHEREAS, Major Hope received a Certificate of Achievement for his
outstanding contribution in presenting "Community Policing" to the members
of the Chesterfield County Police Department; received a Certificate of
Achievement for his supervision of the Accreditation Team; and through
his leadership and guidance, a great deal of hard work and dedication was
put into the accreditation efforts by all team members, which resulted in
the Chesterfield County Police Department receiving accreditation; and
WHEREAS, Major Hope has provided the Chesterfield County Police
Department with many years of loyal and dedicated service; and
WHEREAS, Chesterfield County and the Board of Supervisors will miss
Major Hope's diligent service.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Chesterfield County Board of
Supervisors publicly recognizes Major David P. Hope, and extends on
behalf of its members and the citizens of Chesterfield County,
appreciation for his service to the County, congratulations upon his
retirement, and best wishes for a long and happy retirement.
AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that a copy of this resolution be
presented to Major Hope, and that this resolution be permanently recorded
among the papers of this Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County.
000002
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Page 1 of 1
Meeting Date: February 27, 2002
Item Number: 5.B.
Subject: Resolution Recognizing the Retirement of Mrs. Jean P. Joyner,
Sr. Customer Service Representative in the Treasurer's Office
County Administrator's Comments:
County Administrator:
Board Action Requested:
Request approval of the attached resolution honoring Mrs. Joyner.
Summary of Information'
Mrs. Jean P. Joyner provided over 25 years of service to Chesterfield
County. She will be retiring on March 1, 2002.
Preparer: Title: Treasurer
/ Rich~A. Cordle
Attachments'
Yes ~-~ No
#
000003
RECOGNIZING MRS. JEAN P. JOYNER UPON HER RETIREMENT
WHEREAS, Mrs. Jean P. Joyner will retire on March 1, 2002 after
providing over twenty-five years of dedicated and faithful service to
Chesterfield County; and
WHEREAS, Mrs. Joyner accepted employment with the Utility Department
originally in 1955 as a Supervisory Account Clerk, where she worked for
eight years until the birth of her daughter; and
WHEREAS, Mrs. Joyner returned to work for Chesterfield County in the
Treasurer's Office as a part-time Account Clerk in 1980 until she was
hired as a full-time Senior Account Clerk in 1985; and
WHEREAS, Mrs. Joyner has witnessed tremendous growth in Chesterfield
County and in the associated workload processed by the Treasurer's
Office; and
WHEREAS, Mrs. Joyner has actively participated in the development of
many of the automated processes implemented as a result of Chesterfield
County's growth, and was particularly instrumental in helping initiate
Chesterfield County's participation in the Commonwealth of Virginia's
Department of Taxation Set-Off Debt Program; and
WHEREAS, through her committed and unwavering dedication, Mrs.
Joyner has efficiently collected millions of dollars for Chesterfield
County through the aforementioned tax program; and
WHEREAS, Mrs. Joyner has worked tirelessly to offer uncompromising
customer service to the citizens of Chesterfield County; and
WHEREAS, Mrs. Joyner has consistently exemplified the qualities of
professionalism, trust, commitment, integrity, honor, humility and
teamwork in the performance of her duties; and
WHEREAS, Mrs. Joyner has demonstrated her commitment and loyalty to
Chesterfield County and the quality culture through her consistently
positive attitude and happy disposition that will leave a tremendous void
upon her departure.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Chesterfield County Board of
Supervisors publicly recognizes Mrs. Jean P. Joyner and extends it
appreciation for her twenty-five years of dedicated service to the
county, congratulations upon her retirement, and best wishes for a long
and happy retirement.
000004:
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Page 1 of I
Meeting Date: February 27, 2002
Item Number: 6.
Subject:
Work Session on County Administrator's FY2003 Proposed Budget
County Administrator's Comments:
County Administrator:
Board Action Requested:
Hold a work session on the County Administrator's FY2003 Proposed
Budget
Summary of Information:
This time has been set to continue work sessions on the County
Administrator's FY2003 Proposed Budget. This is the second of five
budget work sessions. On February 13th, staff presented FY2003
projected revenues and the Community Services Board budget. During
today's work session Human Services and School Board budgets will be
reviewed. On March 11th budget presentations for Social Services,
Police and Fire and Emergency Medical Services will be made.
On March 13th, a review of the County Administrator's Proposed FY2003
Expenditure Budget is scheduled, in addition to presentations for
Management Services and the Constitutional Officers. Presentations
from the Community Development Division and the Community Development
Block Grant Office are scheduled for March 27th.
Rebecca T. Dickson
Attachments:
Yes
Title: Director, Bud.qet and Management
~-]No
0005
0~50G05
I !
~ ?~ O0000S·
0
~ ~ 0 '
oo~o~o
0 o
4:;
{ {
000'02~S
.L 0
N,
000022
000029
CZ)
OGO030
*,mC
c~
0
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Page 1 of 4
Meetin~l Date:
February27,2002
Item Number: {,~,
Subject:
Advertisement of Tax Rates for FY2003 Biennial Financial Plan and Set
Public Hearings
County Administrator:
Board Action Requested:
Authorize Advertisement of Tax Rates, the proposed FY2003 Biennial Financial
Plan, FY2003-2008 Capital Improvement Program, FY2003 Community Development
Block Grant Program, and other ordinance changes and set public hearings for
March 27, 2002 for these items as outlined below.
Summary of Information:
Public hearings are scheduled for March 27, 2002 on proposed tax rates, the
Proposed FY2003 Biennial Financial Plan, the Proposed FY2003-2008 Capital
Improvement Program, the Proposed FY2003 Community Development Block Grant
Program, and other ordinance changes. Advertisement requirements differ
depending on the item.
The FY2003 Proposed Biennial Financial Plan will include a recommendation for
an increase in the following revenues to cover the cost of services.
Ordinance changes needed to achieve the revenues included in the FY2003
Proposed Biennial Financial Plan are outlined on the following page.
Preparer:
~t~,. ~ ~vv,~,~..~'~.bi¢~ .x_Title: Director of Budget & Management
Rebecca T. Dickson
Attachments:
Yes ~-~No
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OFSUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Page 2 of 4
Meetin l Date: February;27, 2002
Summary of Information (cont.):
These increases were presented to the Board at the revenue work session on
February 13th.
Utility Fee Changes:
The FY2003 Proposed Biennial Financial Plan includes a recommendation to
continue the phased-in increase in the water connection fee to provide
additional capacity.
The current rate structure requires that the cost of projects that provide
additional capacity to support continued development be recovered from
capital cost recovery charges. To provide the required funds, it is
necessary to increase the water capital cost recovery charge by $1,000.
Effective July 1, 2000, the Board of Supervisors approved the first year of
a four-year phase-in for this increase from $2,592 to $2,842. For FY2002,
the phase-in continued with a second $250 increase from $2,842 to $3,092.
For FY2003, staff is recommending a continuation of the phase-in with a third
$250 increase from $3,092 to $3,342 effective July 1, 2002. A final increase
of $250 is anticipated next year; however, an evaluation will be made prior
to making a recommendation to the Board of Supervisors.
Planning Fee Changes:
The FY2003 Proposed Biennial Financial Plan also includes a recommendation to
increase the current rates for many of the development review fees (including
rezoning, site plan, and subdivision reviews) in an effort to recover the
costs of performing development reviews. Staff is proposing to adjust these
fees annually for the next several years to attain the goal of covering
approximately 80% of the Planning Department's cost for these services. The
proposal also includes a few new fees to cover expenses not currently
recovered under the current fee structure, such as amending a condition of a
special exception and remanded cases. Staff is not proposing increases in
fees for items such as variances or mobile homes. The proposed increases are
shown on the attached sheet (See Attachment A) .
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Page 3 of 4
Meetin~l Date: February27, 2002
Summary of Information (cont.):
Proposed Tax Rates:
The Board must advertise a rate of assessment for each tax classification for
the 2002 tax year. Advertisement of a specific rate leaves the Board
flexibility to adopt any rate up to the advertised rate. The proposed tax
rates are:
Real Estate
Personal Property
Personal Property Tax for members of volunteer
Rescue squads, volunteer fire departments,
Volunteer police chaplains, and auxiliary police
Personal Property Tax for Wild or Exotic Animals
Personal Property Tax for Motor Vehicles that use
"clean and special fuels"
Personal Property Tax for Motor Vehicles, Trailers,
And Semi-Trailers with a gross weight of 10,000
Lbs. or more
Machinery and Tools
Airplanes
$1.08
$3.60
$0.96
$o.oi
$3.24
$0.96
$i.00
$o.5o
The Code of Virginia requires that public hearings on the budget and on tax
rates be held at different times but can be held on the same day. Therefore,
public hearings are planned to be advertised as follows:
Proposed Ordinance changes: 7:00 p.m.
Proposed Tax Rates: 7:10 p.m.
Proposed FY2003-2008 Capital Improvement Program: 7:15 p.m.
Proposed FY2003 Community Development Block Grant Program: 7:20 p.m.
Proposed FY2003 Proposed Biennial Financial Plan: 7:30 p.m.
Other fee increases included in the Proposed FY2003 Biennial Financial Plan
that do not require an ordinance change are:
Solid Waste
Staff is proposing an increase in the leaf vacuuming fee from $48 to $100 per
collection in order to expand the curbside recycling program to all single
family homes. Currently 3,500 households utilize the leaf vacuum service.
The cost per collection averages $177 while the charge per collection is $48.
Raising the leaf vacuum fee to $100 would cover about 56% of the cost
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Page 4 of 4
Meeting Date: February 27, 2002
Summary of Information (cont.):
for the service. The $100 fee would generate an additional $171,000 in
revenue. This revenue combined with expenditure savings within Solid Waste
will enable the county to expand curbside recycling to the 12,211 homes
currently excluded from the program.
000036
n-6~ -nm
oo ooo o ooo oo oo ooo oo goo~o o ~o
Z~
oO 0o0 oOOOO oo Oo oo ooo oo oo o 0 o
ZTM
oo ooo ooooo oo oo oo ooo oo ooo~o~ooooo~° ~R
Z~
oo ooo ooooo oo oo oo ooo oo ~g~g~gg~gg · ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ='='~'~'='T~'y~
-__88 888 ~ ~ ~ 888 8~ ~ 8 ~
88 888 ~'D'~' ~ ~ ~ ~§. ~
~ ~ 888 8 8888888o
000037
"11
o
=. ZTM
oo oo ~ oooo ooooo ~o~o~oo oo~ ooooo~~ ~
~ Z~
oo oo oooo ooooo oooooo ~ ~ooo
~ '"" o o ~, ~ ~ ~ ,'-, ~ ,.-, ,--, ~.~m~oZoZ ,.., >:>> ~
c'~' < < ~ c' c' c'"ff m "e' -- ~ c' c'~'~ ......
-~ _.-,. ~. ~ ~ "' '" ~ "'
~88 ~ .......... 8888 88888 8°° 888888== 888 8888
88 * <~ 8888 88888 8==oooo88 888 8888
~'~-
0000,38
"11
0
!
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Page I of 1
Meeting Date: February 27, 2002
Item Number: 8.B.~.
Subject:
Nominations/Appointments to the Youth Services Citizen Board
County Administrator's Comments:
County Administrator:
Board Action Requested:
Nominate/appoint members to serve on the Youth Services Citizen Board.
Summary of Information:
The purpose of the Youth Services Citizen Board (YSCB) is to advise the Board
of Supervisors regarding planning and policies affecting youth development
and to provide a community forum to focus on youth issues.
Clover Hill District. Supervisor Warren has recommended that the Board
appoint Lindsey Bottorf, a student at Monacan High School, to the Youth
Services Citizen Board effective immediately through June 30, 2002. Ms.
Bottorf meets all eligibility requirements to fill the vacancy and has
indicated her willingness to serve.
Under existing Rules of Procedure, appointments to boards and committees are
nominated at one meeting and appointed at the subsequent meeting unless the
Rules of Procedure are suspended by a unanimous vote of the Board members
present. Nominees are voted on in the order in which they are nominated.
Attachments: [--~ Yes
No
Title:
Director, Youth Services
#
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Page 1 of 1
Meeting Date: February 27, 2002
Item Number: 8.B.2.
Subject:
Nomination/Appointment to the DruG and Alcohol Abuse Task Force
County Administrator's Comments:
County Administrator:
Board Action Requested:
Nominate/appoint a member to serve on the Drug and Alcohol Abuse Task Force.
Summary of Information:
The purpose of the Drug and Alcohol Abuse Task Force is to study the nature
and extent of substance abuse within the County and to make recommendations
to the Board of Supervisors to prevent or eliminate such problems. The
terms of Task Force members are at the pleasure of the board.
Supervisor Warren has recommended that Dr. Bancroft Greene be appointed
representing the Clover Hill District.
Under the existing Rules of Procedure, appointments to boards and
committees are nominated at one meeting and appointed at the subsequent
meeting unless the Rules of Procedure are suspended by a unanimous vote of
the Board members present. Nominees are voted on in the order in which they
are nominated.
Preparer:
Jana D. Carter
Title: Director, Youth Services
Attachments:
[Yes
No
000040
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Page I of I
Meetin~l Date: February/27, 2002
Subiect:
Item Number:
Nomination/Appointment of Preservation Committee Members
County Administrator's Comments:
County Administrator: ~
8.B.3.
Board Action Requested:
Nominate/Appoint the following to the Preservation Committee for a
three year term.
Summary of Information:
The following members have agreed to be reappointed to serve a 3 year
term from March 12, 2002 to March 9, 2005: Mary Ellen Howe (resident
of the City of Petersburg), James V. Daniels, J. Carl Morris, G. M.
"Skip" Wallace, Bryan Walker, Douglas Woolfolk, John V. Cogbill
The Preservation Committee is appointed by the Board of Supervisors
for a three year term. The members of this committee assist in the
administration of the provisions of the Preservation Ordinance.
The members of the Preservation Committee are appointed as At Large
members and will serve from March 12, 2002 to March 9, 2005.
Under the existing Rules of Procedure, appointments to boards and
committees are nominated at one meeting and appointed at the
subsequent meeting unless the Rules of Procedure are suspended by a
unanimous vote of the Board members present. Nominees are voted on in
the order in which they are nominated.
Preparer:
Thomas E. Jacobson
Title: Director of Planning
C:DATA/AENDN2002/FEB27.3/GOK
Attachments:
Yes f'~ No
000041
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
KELLY E. MILLER
CHAIRMAN
DALE DISTRICT
ARTHUR S. WARREN
VICE-CHAIRMAN
CLOVER HILL DISTRICT
J. L. McHALE, III
BERMUDA DISTRICT
RENNY BUSH HUMPHREY
MATOACA DISTRICT
EDWARD B. BARBER
MIDLOTHIAN DISTRICT
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
P.O. Box 40
CHESTERFIELD, VIRGINIA 23832-0040
(804) 748-1211
LANE B. RAMSEY
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
Members of the Chesterfield County Board of S~ervisors
Lane B. Ramsey, County Administrator
February 27, 2002
Nominations for the Chesterfield County Preservation Committee
The Preservation Committee members are appointed At Large to serve a three (3) year term. The
current term expired on March 12, 2002.
The following members have agreed to be reappointed to serve a 3 year term from March 12,
2002 to March 9, 2005: Mary Ellen Howe (Resident of the City of Petersburg) James V. Daniels,
J. Carl Morris, G.W. "Skip" Wallace, Bryan Walker, Douglas Woolfolk, John V. Cogbill.
00004;2
Providing a FIRST CHOICE community through excellence in public service.
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Page 1 of 1
Meetin~l Date: Februa~ 27, 2002
Recognizing March 2002,as"Purchasing Month"
Item Number:8.c.
County Administrator's Comments:
County Administrator:
Board Action Requested:
Consent item resolution to declare March 2002~ as"Purchasing Month[
Summary of Information:
Purchasing associations throughout the world participate in Purchasing
month as recognition for the purchasing profession and its value to the
economic conditions within all localities, states, and nations. Public
purchasing requires: that ethical principles govern all conduct; a working
knowledge of a wide range of goods and services; up-to-date knowledge of
legalities and regulations; ability to communicate and skills to work with
a diversity of users and vendors; and technical knowledge in areas such as
purchasing methods, contracting, source selection, bidding, negotiation,
evaluation methods, scheduling, and contract administration. It is
requested that Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors participate in
supporting this recognition on a local basis.
Attachments' Yes ~ No
Title:
Director of Purchasing
000043
RECOGNIZING MARCH 2002, AS ~'PURCHASING MONTH"
WHEREAS, the purchasing and materials management profession has a
significant role in the quality, efficiency and profitability of business
and government throughout the United States; and
WHEREAS, the purchasing and materials management profession works
for private and public, and profit and nonprofit organizations; and
WHEREAS, in addition to the purchase of goods and services, the
purchasing and materials management profession engages in or has direct
responsibility for functions such as executing, implementing and
administering contracts; developing forecast and procurement strategies;
supervising and/or monitoring the flow and storage of materials; and
developing working relations with suppliers and with other departments
within the organization; and
WHEREAS, the purchasing and materials management profession has
tremendous influence on the economic conditions in the United States,
with an accumulative purchasing power running into the billions of
dollars; and
WHEREAS, purchasing or procurement operations range from departments
of one person to several thousand; and
WHEREAS, governmental purchasing and other associations around the
world are sponsoring activities and special events to further educate and
inform the general public on the role of purchasing within business,
industry and government.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Chesterfield County Board of
Supervisors hereby recognizes the month of March 2002, as 'lPurchasing
Month" in Chesterfield County and encourages all citizens to join in
commemorating this observance.
000044
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Page I of 1
Meetin~l Date:
February 27, 2002
Item Nu.m~er: ~,~,1,~,
Sub] eot;
Resolution Recognizing Marian E. Swam3 of the Department of General Services
Upon Her Retirement
County Administrator's Comments:
County Administrator:
Board Action Requested:
Adoption of the attached resolution.
Summary of Information:
Mrs. Marian E. Swarm will be retiring on March 1, 2002 after more than 15
Years of Service as a custodian with the Department of General Services.
Preparer~-~,. Pita'r°~\
Title: Director of General Services
Attachments:
Yes
No
000045
RECOGNIZING MRS. MARION E. SWANN UPON HER RETIREMENT
WHEREAS, Mrs. Marion E. Swann will retire from the Building and
Grounds Division of the Chesterfield County Department of General
Services on March 1, 2002 after more than sixteen years of superior
public service; and
WHEREAS, Mrs. Swann was hired in July 1985 as a part time Custodian,
and as a result of her positive attitude, superior customer service,
motivation and initiative, was placed into a full time Custodian position
in April 1986, after a very short time as a part time employee; and
WHEREAS, throughout her career, Mrs. Swann has maintained a personal
objective to ensure excellence and quality in the custodial services that
she provided in the Chesterfield County government facilities; and
WHEREAS, in addition to expert custodial skills, Mrs. Swann also
possesses excellent leadership skills that enable her to view situations
from a "Can Do" perspective that has paved the way for her to
consistently exceed the expectations of her job by always going the extra
mile in providing the best possible service to the employees and
customers; and
WHEREAS, over the span of her career with the county, Mrs. Swann has
frequently received recognition and compliments for the service and
assistance she provided.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Chesterfield County Board of
Supervisors recognizes Mrs. Marion E. Swann for more than sixteen years
of superior service to the county, and extends on behalf of its members
and the citizens of Chesterfield County, congratulations upon her
retirement and best wishes for the future.
0000, : ;
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Page 1 of 4
Meetin~l Date: February 27, 2002
Item Number:
8.C.l.c.
Subject:
Resolution, Appropriation and Transfer of Funds for Meadowville
Technology Park Industrial Access Road Project "L2"
County Administrator: ~
Board Action Requested: The Board is requested to adopt the attached
resolution asking the Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) to
approve industrial access funds for the reconstruction of Meadowville Road
east of 1-295 to serve the Meadowville Technology Park Industrial Access L2
Project, appropriate $450,000 in anticipated VDOT reimbursements, transfer
$950,000 from the Industrial Access Account, and authorize staff to award a
road construction contract to lowest responsible bidder up to $650,000.
Summary of Information:
The County is actively recruiting companzes to locate in the Meadowville
Technology Park east of 1-295. A new, improved access road is needed to
serve the park. The access road could be constructed utilizing VDOT
industrial access funds.
Under the VDOT Industrial Access program, the County can receive up to
$300,000 in unmatched VDOT funds (10% of the qualifying capital investment
up to $3,000,000) for the construction of industrial access roads. The
County may request up to $150,000 in supplemental funds (5% of the
(Continued on next page)
Preparer:
Agen516
Title:Director of Transportation
Attachments:
Yes
--~No
00O041
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Page 2 of 4
Summary of Information: (Continued)
capital investment above $3,000,000) provided the funds are matched on a
dollar-for-dollar basis from other than VDOT funds. Before VDOT will
authorize the industrial access funds, the qualifying capital investment
must be under firm contract or the County must provide VDOT a surety bond
guaranteeing that the investment will occur within five years of the
Commonwealth Transportation Board's allocation of the industrial access
funds. VDOT funds can only be used for engineering and access road
construction. Right-of-way acquisition and utility adjustments must be
financed from other than VDOT industrial access funds.
Since the County will be the "developer" for the park, the County will be
responsible for preparing construction plans and environmental studies,
acquiring right-of-way, mitigating wetland impacts and providing surety
bonds for the new industrial access roads. The County will also be
responsible for paying for the cost for utility adjustments and providing
the matching funds. Either VDOT or the County will construct the road.
This decision will be made at a later date.
The preliminary cost estimate for constructing the Meadowville Technology
Park "L2" access road is $950,000. Staff believes the County will attract
sufficient qualifying capital investment within five years to justify the
maximum VDOT industrial access fund allocation. If the development does not
occur, the County would have to reimburse VDOT for their industrial access
funds. The County will be responsible for providing the required $150,000
in local match and $320,000 in local un-matched funds. The County will also
have to provide a $450,000 surety guaranteeing the capital investment will
be made within VDOT's five-year time limit.
Recommendation:staff recommends that the Board take the following
actions:
Adopt the attached resolution requesting VDOT to approve industrial
access funds for the Meadowville Technology Park Industrial Access
Project "L2". The resolution guarantees VDOT that the County will
provide the necessary right-of-way, utility adjustments, and surety
for the project.
Appropriate $450,000 in anticipated VDOT reimbursements for the
construction of the access road.
o
Transfer, from the Industrial Access Account to the project, $150,000
for matching funds, $320,000 for un-matched funds, $30,000 for the
capital investment surety cost and $450,000 for the capital investment
surety.
(Continued on next page}
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Page 3 of 4
Summary of Information' (Continued)
o
Authorize the County Administrator to enter into the necessary
County/VDOT/Developer construction agreements/contracts, permits, and
surety agreements, acceptable to the County Attorney, in order to have
the access road constructed.
Authorize staff to advertise a road construction contract for the
access road and award a contract up to $650,000 for the Meadowville
Technology Park Industrial Access Road Project "L2" to the lowest
responsible bidder.
Accept the right-of-way for the access road and authorize the County
Administrator to sign the deed.
District: Bermuda
000049
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Page 4 of 4
Meetino Date: Februarv 27. 2002 Number
Bud.qet and Management Comments:
This request would transfer $950,000 from the Industrial Road Access
Account and appropriate $450,000 in anticipated VDOT reimbursements for
the reconstruction of Meadowvitle Road and related costs. This road
would then serve as an access road to Meadowville Technology Park. The
Commonwealth Transportation Board requires the County to post a surety
bond guaranteeing that the required capital investment would occur
within five years of the State's allocation of funds. Should the
required investment not have occurred by that point, then the County
would be required to reimburse the $450,000 of state funds. Due to the
requirements of the surety, funds for this reimbursement must be
transferred to the account at this time.
The request also includes the advertisement and award of a road
construction contract for this intersection not to exceed $650,000.
Preparer:
Rebecca T. Dickson
Title: Director, Budget & Management
WHEREAS, Chesterfield County ("the County") plans to construct a new
industrial park off of Headewville Road; and
WHEREAS, the industrial park requires the construction of a new road;
and
WHEREAS, the construction ef qualifying capital investment is expected
te occur within five (5) years ef the Commonwealth Transportation Board's
allocation ef funds for the construction ef an access read te the property
and is expected to satisfy VDOT's capital investment requirements; and
WHEREAS, Chesterfield County hereby guarantees that the necessary
right-of-way and utility adjustments for the new access road will be
provided at no cost to the Virginia Department of Transportation.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Chesterfield County Board of
Supervisors hereby requests the Commonwealth Transportation Board to
provide industrial access funding to construct an adequate road to the
industrial park.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Chesterfield Board of Supervisors
hereby agrees to provide a surety acceptable to VDOT, to guarantee
sufficient qualifying capital investment will occur within five years of
the Commonwealth Transportation Board's allocation of industrial access
funds for the access road.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Chesterfield County Board of
Supervisors hereby agrees that the new roadway so constructed will be added
to and become a part of the Secondary System of Highways.
Meadowville Technology Park Industrial Access Project "L2"
BUDGET
ACCESS ROAD
ESTIMATED
COST
Preliminary Engineering
Environmental/Cultural Resource Studies
Right-of-Way
Utility Adjustments
Access Road Construction
Construction Contingency
Construction Administration and Inspection
Mitigation
Capital Investment Surety Cost
TOTAL:
$50,000
$10,000
$0
$30,000
$65O,OOO
$130,000
$5O,OOO
$0
$30,000
$950,000
County
CAPITAL INVESTMENT SURETY
REVENUE
ACCESS ROAD
VDOT Unmatched
VDOT Match
County Match (IAF)
County Unmatched
County Capital Investment Surety Cost (IAF)
Developer Match
TOTAL:
$450,000
$300,000
$150,000
$150,000
$32O,OOO
$30,000
$0
$950,000
00005;8
MEADO~A/ILLE TECHNOLOGY PARK
NDUSTRIA ACCESS ROAD "L2"
IH DH S?RIAI. ACOE$ $
0.9 0 0~ t.8 Miles
~ .............................. ; I I I I II I
PROPOSED ACCE~ ROAD
N
S
0~0053
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Page I of 1
Meetin~l Date: February/13, 2002
Item Number: 8.c.[.~.
Subject:
Resolution Supporting Prayer in Public Schools
County Administrator's Comments:
County Administrator:
Board Action Requested:
Mr. Miller requested that the following resolution be adopted.
Summary of Information:
This resolution is in support of House Joint Resolution 81 introduced in
Congress on December 20, 2001 endorsing prayer in public schools.
Donald J. Kabel ! va ~
Title:
Director1 Public Affairs
Attachments:
Yes ~-~ No
RESOLUTION SUPPORTING PRAYER IN PUBLIC SCHOOLS
WHEREAS, our nation was founded on the precepts of freedom,
diversity and the right of all people to acknowledge God according to the
dictates of their conscience and beliefs; and
WHEREAS, while neither the United States nor any state shall
establish any official religion, but the people's right to pray and to
recognize their religious beliefs, heritage and traditions on public
property, including school property, shall not be infringed; and
WHEREAS, House Joint Resolution 81 was introduced on December 20,
2001 by a number of U. S. representatives, proposing an amendment to the
Constitution of the United States that would prevent any infringement of
a person's right to pray on public property, including school property;
and
WHEREAS, while this Board of Supervisors supports any person's right
not to pray or participate in any religious observance on public
property, including schools, it equally supports any person's right to
~ or participate in any religious observance on public property,
including schools; and
WHEREAS, the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors urges all
cities and counties across the United States to join in an effort to
reinstate voluntary prayer in public schools and uniting in a "grass
roots" movement for that purpose.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Chesterfield County Board of
Supervisors strongly supports House Joint Resolution 81 introduced in
Congress on December 20, 2001.
000055
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Page I of 2
Meetin~l Date: February/27, 2002
Item Number: 8.¢.~-.
Subiect: Appropriation of Funds for the Cloverleaf Mall Area Study from
Reserve for Future Capital Projects
County Administrator's Comments:
County Administrator:
Board Action Requested:
The Staff requests the Board of Supervisors appropriate funds of $50,000
from the Reserve for Future Capital Projects for consultant fees to
prepare a study to help develop a revitalization/development strategy
for the Cloverleaf Mall Area.
Summary of Information:
The goal of the Cloverleaf Mall Area Study is to identify the County's
long-term revitalization/redevelopment strategy, including the
development of proactive action steps, to address the deterioration of
the Cloverleaf Mall area (see attached map). The project will require
the assistance of a consultant.
The project will identify options for public and private actions
including, but not limited to, the following:
o Review and analyze the current "health" (current market situation,
fiscal, physical, etc.) of the study area
o Analyze revitalization/redevelopment tools available to the county
o Analyze the county's current capacity (fiscal and organizational)
to undertake a revitalization/redevelopment effort
o Prepare a cost/benefit analysis for various development scenarios
o Recommend a strategy for revitalization/redevelopment of the study
area
Preparer:
Thomas E. Jacobson
Title: Director of Planning
C:DATA/AG EN DN2002/FEB27.1/GOK
Attachments:
Yes
~--~No
#000O56
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Page 2 of 2
Meetin(3 Date: February 27.2002 Number
Bud.qet and Mana.qement Comments:
This item transfers $50,000 for FY2002 from the Reserve for Future
Capital Projects to the Planning Department to fund a study of
revitalization/redevelopment of the Cloverleaf Mall Area. The current
balance in the Reserve for Future Capital Projects is $1,886,312. If
this request is approved, the balance in the reserve for future capital
projects would be $1,836,312.
Preparer: ~~.<7~i~K~ Title' Director, Bud.qet&Mana.qement
Rebecca T. Dickson
000057
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OFSUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Page 1 of 2
Meetin~l Date: February, 27, 2002
Item Number: 8.c.3.
Subiect:
Proposed Amendments to the "Guidelines for Review of Substantial
Accord Determinations and/or Zoning Approval for Communications
Tower Locations"
County Administrator's Comments:
County Administrator:
Board Action Requested:
Planning Commission recommends the Board of Supervisors adopt the
attached amendments relating to the Tower "Siting Guidelines."
Summary of Information:
The Commission has recommended amendments
guidelines as follows:
to the towers
siting
o Towers to be unlighted unless determined to have minimal
adverse impact on area
o Towers be of a monopole design
o Other changes that reflect current practices (paving and
County's Communications System)
The proposed lighting revisions were prompted by concerns that FAA could
make a ruling that a particular tower having a height of less than 200
feet be lighted. Prior to that time, unless such a tower had been in
proximity to an airport, FAA had not required lighting. While the
standard conditions have typically allowed such lighting, it had
apparently been the Commission's understanding that most towers would
not be lighted. The proposed amendment would preclude lighting unless if
at the time of application, details are submitted which insures that
lighting would not have an adverse impact on the area.
Preparer:
Thomas E. Jacobson
Title: Director of Planning
C:DATA/AGENDA/2002/FEB27.2
Attachments:
Yes [---~ No
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Page 2 of 2
The other parts of the amendment address current practice to require
freestanding towers be of a monopole desiqn; change the reference to
the County's Communications system; and deletes reference to the
paving requirements since they are addressed in the Ordinance.
Representatives of the two (2) more active telecommunication
services providers have expressed concerns regarding the lighting
amendments. One (1) of the representatives has expressed concern
that initially FAA may not require lighting, but subsequent
regulations may require lighting. Should this occur, it would be
necessary to seek a zoning amendment.
Should such an amendment be denied, it would be necessary to
dismantle the tower, which is a major investment.
000060
Guidelines for Review of Substantial Accord Determinations and/or Zoning Approval for
Communications Tower Locations
(Note: In general, the following are the guidelines which will be used to deliberate a proposed tower
location relative to Substantial Accord and/or Zoning approval. Meeting these guidelines
will not automatically address site specific concerns. Additional conditions may be imposed
and/or recommended to address such concerns to further insure compliance with the Plan for
Chesterfield or the purposes of the Zoning Ordinance in the instance of a zoning action.)
Typically, the tower should be located in an area designated on the Comprehensive
Plan for general commercial, general industrial and agricultural/forestal use.
Typically, the tower should also satisfy the locational and design criteria for towers
outlined in the Public Facilities Plan. The Public Facilities Plan suggests that:
1)
The tower should, where appropriate, be located in the vicinity of other
existing towers and the tower should generally be designed to allow for
shared use.
2)
The tower should generally be located away from existing or planned areas of
residential, recreational and similar types of development. Specifically,
towers should generally be located away from agriculturally zoned land
identified on the Comprehensive Plan for residential use, residences on
agriculturally zoned land, residentially zoned property, villages, schools,
parks, community recreational facilities or similar development;
3)
Views of the tower from such existing or planned areas of development
should be minimized.
If a tower is to be located in the vicinity of existing or planned areas of development
or other high visibility areas, such as near the intersections of major roads or along
rivers, the tower should be architecturally incorporated in the design of an existing
structure, such as a church or office building, or possess design features that mask the
utilitarian nature of the tower. Otherwise, the tower should be located as remotely as
possible from existing or planned areas of development or other high visibility areas
and on property that is densely wooded with mature trees. Measures should be taken
to insure the preservation of a mature stand of trees around the tower. The stand of
trees should be of sufficient width, height and density to minimize views of the
tower. Further, any antennas or other tower-mounted equipment should be designed,
spaced, placed, and/or masked so as to minimize the visual impact.
Do
The tower should be located and/or designed so as not to create a hazard for air
navigation or affect the operations of the Chesterfield County Airport.
E. The tower should be located to minimize the possibility of any adverse impact on
existing or planned areas of development, the Chesterfield County thabti~f-~5,
~ Communications System and the County Airport. To address these
concerns, following is a list of conditions typically recommended for imposition on
tower requests:
1. There shall be no signs permitted to identify this use. (P)
The base of the tower shall be enclosed by a minimum six (6) foot high fence
designed to preclude trespassing. The fence shall be placed so as to provide
sufficient room between the fence and the property line to accommodate
evergreen plantings having an initial height and spacing to provide screening
of the base of the tower and accessory ground mounted equipment or
structures from adjacent properties. A detailed plan depicting this
requirement shall be submitted to the Planning Department for approval in
conjunction with final site plan review. (P)
o
The tower and equipment shall be designed and installed so as not to interfere
with the Chesterfield County D~:b"" end's,,, ~'.,,,~r~,~ Communications
System. At the time of site plan review, the owner/developer shall submit
information as deemed necessary by the Chesterfield County
Communications and Electronics staff to determine if an engineering study
should be performed to analyze the possibility of radio frequency interference
with the County system, based upon tower location and height, and upon the
frequencies and effective radiated power generated by tower mounted
equipment. Prior to release of a building permit the study, if required, shall
be submitted to, and approved by, the Chesterfield County Communications
and Electronics staff. (GS)
The developer shall be responsible for correcting any frequency problems
which affect the Chesterfield County Public Safety Tr,:nked Communications
System caused by this use. Such corrections shall be made immediately upon
notification by the Chesterfield County Communications and Electronics
staff. (GS)
5. The color and lighting system for the tower shall be as follows:
ao
The tower shall be gray or another neutral color, acceptable to the
Planning Department. (P)
b. The tower shall not be lighted.
(Note: At the time of application, if lighting is desired, detailed plans as to
the proposed lighting shall be submitted. Those details will be reviewed by
the Staff, Planning Commission, and Board of Supervisors to determine if
lighting would have a negative impact on the surrounding area. Generally.
if lighting is determined not to have an adverse impact, the following.
condition will typically be recommended: If ?.g~ted Lighting during
000062
daylight hours shall be limited to medium intensity strobe lights with
upward reflection and lighting during night- time hours shall be limited to
soft blinking lights with upward reflection.) (P)
c. The tower shall be of a monopole structure.
(Note: hit~a~4v~y,, At the time of application, if alternative treatment of
the tower is desired, or determined to be appropriate given the location
such as in a residential area, detailed plans as to the proposed alternative
treatment shall be submitted. Those details will be reviewed by the Staff,
Planning Commission, and Board of Supervisors to determine if the
alternative design would have a negative impact on the surrounding area,
Such treatments, which are designed to disguise the appearance of the
tower, may include masking devices, design features, or incorporation into
the architectural design of a building,) .rko_ ,.~,~,_ ^~, ..~, .......... ~.~
Any building or mechanical equipment shall comply with Section (area in
which located) of the Zoning Ordinance relative to architectural treatment of
building exteriors and screening of mechanical equipment. (P)
(NOTE: Section (area in which located) would require the screening of
mechanical equipment located on the building or ground from adjacent
properties and public rights of way. Screening would not be required for the
tower or tower-mounted equipment. Provided, however, that in I-2 and I-3
Districts, such equipment need not be screened from view of any I-2 or I-3
District or any public right of way which does not accommodate or is not
intended to accommodate through traffic movements.)
78.
At such time that the tower ceases to be used for communications purposes
for a period exceeding twelve (12) consecutive months, the owner/developer
shall dismantle and remove the tower and all associated equipment from the
property. (P)
(NOTE:
These conditions are subject to modifications that address site-
specific concems.)
000063
Guidelines for Administrative Review of Substantial Accord Determinations for
Communications Tower Locations
(Note: Meeting these guidelines should address most of the concerns that tower siting requests
typically generate. However, meeting these guidelines will not automatically address site-
specific concerns or grant Substantial Accord approval. Staff may, through the
administrative process, recommend that the applicant seek Planning Commission approval or
recommend appropriate conditions to insure that the tower site is in Substantial Accord with
the Comprehensive Plan.)
Administrative review of Substantial Accord Determinations for communications tower locations
may be performed if:
A. The tower site is zoned to permit the tower use.
Bo
The tower site location and/or surrounding land uses mitigate the impact of the tower on
existing and future areas of development, to include but not limited to: agriculturally zoned
land identified on the Comprehensive Plan for residential use, residences on agriculturally
zoned land, residentially zoned property, villages, schools, parks, community recreational
facilities or similar development. Specifically, administrative review will be performed only
if: a) an intermediate commercial or industrial use exists between the tower site and such
development; and b) the tower meets minimum setbacks from such development of forty (40)
feet plus one (1) foot for each foot the tower exceeds a height of forty-five (45) feet.
If the tower site is located a minimum distance of 1,000 feet from residences on
agriculturally zoned land, residentially zoned property, villages, schools, parks, community
recreational facilities or similar development, or a minimum distance of 500 feet from
agriculturally zoned land identified on the Comprehensive Plan for residential use, an
intermediate commercial or industrial use will not be required.
If the tower is incorporated into the architectural treatment of a permitted use, an
intermediate use or the 1,000 and 500-foot distance requirements will not be required. The
tower must still comply with the minimum setbacks specified above.
The tower site location and/or surrounding land uses mitigate the impact of the tower on high
visibility areas, such as along major traffic corridors, near the intersections of major roads or
along the James River. Administrative review will be performed only if: a) an intermediate
commercial or industrial use exists between the tower site and such high visibility areas; and
b) the tower meets minimum setbacks from such areas of forty (40) feet plus one (1) foot for
each foot the tower exceeds a height of forty-five (45) feet.
If the tower site is located a minimum distance of 1,000 feet from such areas, an intermediate
commercial or industrial use will not be required.
If a 100-foot buffer of mature trees at an elevation that will mitigate the view of the tower is
preserved between the tower and high visibility areas, an intermediate use or the 1,000 foot
distance requirement will not be required. The tower must still comply with the minimum
000064
setbacks specified above. To insure that the buffer of trees will mitigate the view of the
tower, the topography of the buffer area should be at no point lower than ten (10) feet below
the elevation of the base of the tower.
If the tower is incorporated into the architectural treatment of a permitted use, an
intermediate use, buffer or the 1,000-foot distance requirement will not be required. The
tower must still comply with the minimum setbacks specified above.
(Note: Buffers required by Ordinance or by conditions of zoning would remain applicable.)
The tower should be located and/or designed so as not to create a hazard for air navigation or
affect the operations of the Chesterfield County Airport, as determined by the Director of
Aviation Services.
If these criteria cannot be met, the Substantial Accord will be reviewed by the Planning Commission
through the public heating process.
(NOTE: Under the Substantial Accord Policy of Chesterfield County, the following
procedures apply:
Ao
An administrative finding that the tower is in Substantial Accord with the
Plan must be reviewed by the Planning Commission. The Commission may
affirm or vacate the finding.
If the Commission affirms the administrative finding, the tower is deemed to
be in Substantial Accord with the Plan. The Board of Supervisors does not
review this decision unless the decision is appealed by the applicant.
Bo
If the Commission vacates the administrative finding, a public hearing will be
scheduled before the Planning Commission which will then determine if the
tower is in Substantial Accord with the Plan.
The Commission's finding is then reviewed by the Board of Supervisors.
The Board may overrule or affirm the Commission's finding or refer the
matter back to the Commission for further public hearing. Also, the applicant
may appeal the Commission's finding to the Board.)
000065
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page I of 1
AGENDA
Meetin~l Date: February 27, 2002 Item Number: 8.C.4.
Subiect: Street-Name Change
County Administrator's Comments:
County Administrator: //'~~'~ ~
Board Action Requested:
The Board of Supervisors is requested to approve the renaming of Clearcreek
Lane to Clearcreek Place.
Summary of Information:
Walthall Creek, Section 5, was recorded in 1988 and included a stub road to
an adjacent parcel. The stub road was named Clearcreek Lane and was to
eventually tie into Woods Edge Road. When the adjacent parcel was developed,
the Planning Commission denied access to Woods Edge Road and Cedarcreek Lane
became a cul-de-sac. With the development of Walthall Creek, Section 16, the
new street will become a cul-de-sac. No homes will be affected by this
change. The Richmond Regional Planning District Commission (RRPDC), Crater
Regional Planning District Commission, and the GIS Section of the
Environmental Engineering Department have approved this new street name.
Staff Recommendations:
Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors approve renaming Clearcreek
Lane to Clearcreek Place.
Preparer: ,~.~/'/~,/C ~ Title: Director of Environmental Enaineerina
Richard ~cElfish - -
Attachments: I Yes ~---~ No #
~00066
14312
Scale:
Parcel Map of Chesterfield County
Chesterfield County assumes no legal responsibility
for the information contained on this map. This
map is not to be used for land conveyance.
Thc horizontal data is based on the VA State Plane
Coordinate system, NAD 1983. Thc topographic
information is based on 1989 photogrammetry and
N
NAVD29.
100 0 100 200 Feet
14aOl
14235
144O8
0194
144OO
6
339;'
14401
4
3
14412
7
2
555O
14418
8
6491
14413
7783
14419
14424
9O75
14425
9336
1612
1616
3
Printed by: ee Date: Thu Feb 14 19:45:42 2002
Copyright 2002. Chesterfield County
000067
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Page I of I
Meetin~l Date: February 27, 2002
Item Number: 8.c.5.a.
Subject:
Acceptance of Two Parcels of Land Along the South Right of Way Line
of Proposed Center Pointe Parkway Extended from Bon Secours-
Richmond Health Systems
County Administrator's Comments:
County Administrator:
BoardActionReques~d: Accept the conveyance of two parcels of land containing a
total of 0.081 acres along the south right of way line of proposed Center
Pointe Parkway extended from Bon Secours-Richmond Health Systems and
authorize the County Administrator to execute the deed.
Summary of Information:
It is the policy of the County to acquire right of way whenever possible
through development to meet the ultimate road width as shown on the County
Thoroughfare Plan. The dedication of these parcels conforms to that plan,
and will decrease the right of way costs for road improvements when
constructed.
District: Matoaca
Preparer: ¢~'~ '~J"-~'~'~¢"~ Title:
John W. Harmon
Attachments:
Ycs
Right of Way Manager
#
0006,
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Page I of I
Meetin~l Date: Februar~ 27, 2002
Item Number:
8.C.5.b.
Subiect:
Acceptance of Two Parcels of Land for Center Pointe Parkway
Extended from GC Real Estate Corporation
County Administrator's Comments:
County Administrator:
BoardActionRequested: Accept the conveyance of two parcels of land containing a
total of 2.970 acres for Center Pointe Parkway extended from GC Real Estate
Corporation and authorize the County Administrator to execute the deed.
Summary of Information:
It is the policy of the County to acquire right of way whenever possible
through development to meet the ultimate road width as shown on the County
Thoroughfare Plan. The dedication of these parcels conforms to that plan,
and will decrease the right of way costs for road improvements when
constructed.
District: Matoaca
Preparer: c~ '~J' ~"~"'"~ Title:
John W. Harmon
Attachments:
~'--] No
Ri.qht of Way Mana,qer
00O070
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Page I of I
Meeting Date: Februar~ 27, 2002
Item Number: 8.c.5.c.
Subject:
Acceptance of a Parcel of Land Along the South Right of Way Line of
Hull Street Road from Bi-State Properties
County Administrator's Comments:
County Administrator:
Board Action Requested: Accept the conveyance of a parcel of land containing
0.244 acres along the south right of way line of Hull Street Road (US Route
360) from Bi-State Properties and authorize the County Administrator to
execute the deed.
,Summary of Information:
It is the policy of the County to acquire right of way whenever possible
through development to meet the ultimate road width as shown on the County
Thoroughfare Plan. The dedication of this parcel conforms to that plan, and
will decrease the right of way costs for road improvements when constructed
District: Matoaca
Preparer: Title:
John W. Harmon
Attachments:
Ycs
J--]No
Right of Way Manager
00007;8
447..08
I ~,7,$0,~04.44 '
0B2257 PG549
L=i65.00'
R=200. O0'
T=87.52'
C8=S 07'35'06" E
CH= ! 60.36'
0=47' 16'07'"
HARSOURSIDE DRIVE
O001p/4772
%~0 ~ xp=18.47~ , ,
~ c~6.~o'
80 0 ~0
Scolo !" = 60'
COUN /Y .E/rE PLAN 10 I P~0212
COUNn' PbO,/PCr /01-004.$
El-STATE PROPERTIES
ii6100 MOCKINGBIRD LN.
084,559 PG287
PiN ji730-673- !465-00000
7. 953 ACRES
PARCEL ~"
616.5 SO, F~. OR
0.244 ACRE
II9 8E DEDIC~IED l'O
CHE'EP'ERFIE/..D COUNTY
3, 674, 198.50
~ I 1,72~,896.7§
769.85'
$ 08'04'85" E ?~7. Io'
MICHAEL 8c MYRNA McCAFFEREY
DO2125 PG823
PIN 729-674-8507-~000
13531 HULL STREET R~D
TO BE DEDICATED
~COU~.C~MMe~S TO CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
~ ~.. ~ ~rO~ msrmcr
JOBNO:~{:~:~3, 100103.00 CHESIERFTELO COUNr~, V/RClNIA
~00073
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Page I of I
Meetin~l Date: February 27, 2002
Item Number: e.c.5.d.
II II
Subiect:
Acceptance of a Parcel of Land Along the West Right of Way Line
Chester Road from R & L Enterprises, LLC
County Administrator's Comments:
County Administrator:
Board Action Requested: Accept the conveyance of a parcel of land containing
0.134 acres along the west right of way line of Chester Road (State Route
145) from R & L Enterprises, LLC, and authorize the County Administrator to
execute the deed.
Summary of Information:
It is the policy of the County to acquire right of way whenever possible
through development to meet the ultimate road width as shown on the County
Thoroughfare Plan. The dedication of this parcel conforms to that plan, and
will decrease the right of way costs for road improvements when constructed.
District: Bermuda
Preparer: ~~ ~I'. ~-,,-, Title:
John W. Harmon
Attachments:
Ycs
---]No
Right of Way Manager
# 4
R-
L.,119.62'
'~,-2'50'15"
T-,59.B2'
CB-S19'21'O7"W
C,-,119.61
R-24.15.41'
0 $0 L-334.99'
b-7'56'46"
T-187,76'
SCAI.~ IH FEET CB,-$24'44.'37"W
C,=$34..72
CURVE TABLE
CURVE RADIUS LENGTH DELTA TANGENT CHORD BEARINO CHORD
Cl 25.00' 40.01' 91'4.2'11" 25.75' N 27'55'0~" W 35.88'
C3 2426.61' 167,61' 3'57'27" 8~,~1.' S 2318'55" W 167.5~'
C4. 290.00' 2.02' 0'24'<~;)" 1,01' N 73'58'12' W 2.02'
C5 25.00' 32.5[!' 74'37'23"
ce 25.00, 0,16, 0.22'10- 0.08, s 83'51'21- E 0,16°
C7 290.00' 48,09' 9'30'04" 24.10' N 78'55'14' W 4.~.0~-'
PLAT SHOFING
0,505 AND 0.134 ACRES OF LAND
TO BE DEDICATED
TO THE COUNTY OF CHESTEP~EILD
BERMUDA DISTRICT
CHESTERFEILD COUNTY, VIRGINIA
PREVIOUS ~OB NO.
5~TE PLAN NO. 01PR0225
COUNTY PROJ. NO. 01-0104
TX o rs
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Page I of I
Meetin~l Date: Februar},, 27, 2002
Item Number:
8.C. 5.e.
Subiect:
Acceptance of a Parcel of Land Along the Northeast Right of Way
Line of Reams Road from P & R Associates, LLC
County Administrator's Comments:
County Administrator:
Board Action Requested: Accept the conveyance of a parcel of land of land
containing 0.936 acres along the northeast right of way line of Reams Road
(State Route 647) from P & R Associates, LLC, and authorize the County
Administrator to execute the deed.
Summary of Information:
It is the policy of the County to acquire right of way whenever possible
through development to meet the ultimate road width as shown on the County
Thoroughfare Plan. The dedication of this parcel conforms to that plan, and
will decrease the right of way costs for road improvements when constructed.
,Distr, ict: Clover Hill
Preparer: ~,~ ~1'. C~,-,, Title:
John W. Harmon
Attachments:
~"] No
Riqht of Way Mana.qer
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Page I of I
Meetin~l Date: February 27, 2002
Item Number:
8.C.6.
Subiect:
Request Permission for a Private Sewer Force Main to Encroach
Within a Sixteen-Foot Sewer Easement
County Administrator's Comments:
County Administrator: ~ .~.fi~r~
BoardAction Requested: Grant Jacob A. Lutz, III and Robin R. Lutz permission for
a private sewer force main to encroach within a 16' sewer easement; subject
to the execution of a license agreement.
Summary of Information:
Jacob A. Lutz, III and Robin R. Lutz have requested permission for a private
sewer force main to encroach within a 16' sewer easement as shown on the
attached sketch. This request has been reviewed by staff and approval is
recommended.
District: Midlothian
Preparer: c~/'~'~ ~'J" ~~"' Title:
John W. Harmon
Attachments:
¥CS
J--]No
Ri.qht of Way Mana.qer
000078
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Page I of I
Meetin~l Date: February 27, 2002
Item Number:
8.C.7.
Subiect: Conveyance of an Easement to Verizon Virginia Incorporated
County Administrator's Comments:
County Administrator:
Board Action Requested: Authorize the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors and
the County Administrator to execute an easement agreement with Verizon
Virginia Inc, to install underground cable to serve Winterpock Fire Station,
No. 19, 14010 Beach Road
Summary of Information:
Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors approve the conveyance of an
easement to Verizon Virginia Inc. to install underground cable to serve
Winterpock Fire Station, No. 19, 14010 Beach Road.
District: Matoaca
Preparer: ~"'~ '/'J' ~'~f~"~ Title:
John W. Harmon
Attachments:
[-~ Yes
No
Right of Way Manager
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Page I of I
Meetin~l Date: February 27, 2002
Item Number:
8.C. 8.a.
Subiect:
Request to Quitclaim a Variable Width Storm Water Management System
Best Management Practice Access Easement Across the Property of
Krause Partners
County Administrator's Comments:
County Administrator:
Board Action Requested: Authorize the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors and
the County Administrator to execute a quitclaim deed to vacate a variable
width SWM/BMP access easement across the property of Krause Partners.
Summary of InfOrmation:
Krause Partners has requested the quitclaim of a variable width SWM/BMP
access easement across its property as shown on the attached plat. A new
access easement will be dedicated. Staff has reviewed the request and
recommends approval.
District: Dale
Preparer:
John W. Harmon
Attachments:
~'~No
Title: Ri,qht of Way Mana,qer
'!
PLAT SHOI~ING A VARI,~I~ ~tlOT'l-I A~¢ESS EASEktEfilT
(7'0 0£ VACATKD) LYIN~ A¢CRO$$ TIlE I. AgDS OF
STEPHEN ~t I~.L. SIE~RIST AND IgRAI,~E PAf?DV£R~
000(
~83
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Page I of I
Meeting Date: February 27, 2002
Item Number:
8.C.8.b.
Subiect:
Request to Quitclaim a Variable Width Storm Water Management System
Best Management Practice Access Easement Across the Property of
Stephen K. and Marianne L. Siegrist
County Administrator's Comments:
County Administrator:
Board Action Requested: Authorize the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors and
the County Administrator to execute a quitclaim deed to vacate a variable
width SWM/BMP access easement across the property of Stephen K. and Marianne
L. Siegrist
Summary of Information:
Stephen K. and Marianne L. Siegrist have requested the quitclaim of a
variable width SWM/BMP access easement across their property as shown on the
attached plat. A new access easement will be dedicated. Staff has reviewed
the request and recommends approval.
District: Dale
Preparer: Title:
John W. Harmon
Attachments:
Ycs
~'~No
Ri,qht of Way Manager
000084
,!
fit
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Page 1 of 1
Meetin~ Date: February 27, 2002
Subject: State Road Acceptance
County Administrator's Comments:
Item Number:
County Administrator:
Board Action Requested:
8.C.9.
Summary of Information'
Be rmuda:
Clover Hill:
Dale:
Matoaca:
Midlothian:
Southcreek, Section 5
The Villas at Rivers Bend
Memphis Boulevard
Bel Arbor
Hampton Park, Section 6
Second Branch, Section 2
Salisbury Hatfield, Section 5, and a portion of Phase III
Richard ~cElfish
Attachments:
Yes ~--] No
Title: Director of Environmental Engineerir~g
000086
TO: Board of Supervisors
FROM: Deparmaent of Environmental Engineering
SUBJECT: Sta~e Road Acceptance - SOUTHCREEK, SEC. 5
DISTRICT: BERMUDA
MEETING DATE: 27 February 2002
ROADS FOR CONSIDERATION:
GREEN TRELLIS PL
MAJESTIC CREEK CT
MAJESTIC CREEK DR
Vicinity Map: SOUTHCREEK, SEC. 5
C 00087
TO: Board of Supervisors
FROM: Department of Environmental Engineering
SUBJECT: State Road Acceptance - THE VILLAS AT RIVERS BEND,
DISTRICT: BERMUDA
MEETING DATE: 27 February 2002
ROADS FOR CONSIDERATION:
VII J,&S CT
VILLAS DR
Vicinity Map: THE VILLAS AT RIVERS BEND,
000088
TO: Board of Supervisors
FROIXe ~ of Environn-en~ Engineering
S~: State Road Acceptance
DISTRICT: CLOVER HILL
MEETING DATE: 27 February 2002
ROADS FOR CONSIDERATION:
MEMPHIS BLVD
Vicinity Map:
Prock~ced by Cl~esterfield Cotmty
000089
TO: Board of Supervisors
FROM: Department of Environmental Engineering
SUBJECT: State Road Acceptance - BEL ARBOR, SEC 1
DISTRICT: BERMUDA
MEETING DATE: 27 February 2002
ROADS FOR CONSIDERATION:
BEL ARBOR DR
BEL JOUR PL
BEL LAC DR
RIVIERA CT
Vicinity Map: BEL ARBOR, SEC 1
000090
TO: Board of Supervisors
FROM: Department of Environmental Engineering
SUBJECT: State Road Acceptance - HAMPTON PARK, SEC. 6
DISTRICT: MATOACA
MEETING DATE: 27 February 2002
ROADS FOR CONSIDERATION:
HAMPTON GLEN LN
HAMPTON GLEN MEWS
Vicinity Map: HAMPTON PARK, SEC. 6
OOO091
TO: Board of Supervisors
FROM: Department of Environmental Engineering
SUBJECT: State Road Acceptance - SECOND BRANCH, SEC 2
DISTRICT: MATOACA
MEETING DATE: 27 February 2002
ROADS FOR CONSIDERATION:
BALTA RD
DEVETTE DR
DEVETI'E TER
Vicinity Map: SECOND BRANCH, SEC 2
000092
TO: Board of Supervisors
FROM: ~t of Environmental Engineering
SUBJECt: State Road Acceptance - SALISBURY-HATFIELD, SEC. 5 AND A POR'IION OF PHASE 3
DISTRICT: MIDLOTHIAN
MEEIING DATE: 27 February 2002
ROADS FOR CONSIDERATION:
KESNMO1Nrl' DR
SARUM TER
Vicinity Map: SALISBURY-HATFIELD, SEC 5 AND A PORTION OF PHASE 3
/
oUGHT ON o
RD.
HELMSL~y R~)
P~mOuced by Chesterfield
00009
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Page I of I
Meetin~l Date: February 27, 2002
Item Number: fi,~,,ll],
Subiect:
Approval of Utility Contract for Hampton Park, Section 17 Contract
Number 01-0421
County Administrator's Comments:
County Administrator:
Board Action Requested: Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors
approve this revised contract and authorize the County Administrator to
execute any necessary documents.
Summary of Information'
This project includes the extension of 1,117 L.F.± of 15" oversized sewer
lines. The Developer is required to have an 8" sewer line to serve his
development. Staff has requested that the sewer lines be oversized to
provide service to adjoining properties. In accordance with the ordinance,
the Developer is entitled to refunds for the construction cost of the
oversized improvements.
Developer:
Contractor:
Hampton Park Associates LLC
RMC Contractors, Inc.
Contract Amount: Estimated County Cost for Oversizing ........ $14,521.00
Estimated Developer Cost .................... $67,293.50
Estimated Total ............................. $81,814.50
Code: (Refunds thru Connections - Oversizing) 5N-572VO-E4C
District: Matoaca
Preparer:
Attachments:
Yes ~-~ No
Title: Director of Utilities
# ~'0094.~
VICINITY SKETCH
Hampton Park- Sec. 17
County Project # 01-0421
Hampton Park
Sec. 1 6
Hampton Park
Sec. 11
Proposed Hampton Park
Sec. 17
Proposed 1 5" Sewedine
County Project # 01-0421
Chesterfield County Department of Utilities
Development Section
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Page 1 of ~J
Meetin~l Date:
Subject:
Februar}/27, 2002 Item Number: S.C. ll.
FY02 School Board Grants Mid-Year Revisions
County Administrator's Comments: //~_~~
County Administrator: ~
Board Action Requested:
The School Board requests the Board of Supervisors to increase estimated
federal funds by $240,485 and local funds by $42,647 and increase the
Instruction appropriation category by $283,132 in the School Grants Fund.
Summary of Information:
Chesterfield County Public Schools (CCPS) includes anticipated grant funding
in their annual financial plan. In addition, staff applies for and receives
additional grants at various times during the fiscal year. School Board
staff has applied for five (5) additional grants for FY2002. CCPS has also
received notification from various sources for revisions to two existing
grants (Title I and Philip Morris Life Skills Training). CCPS has been
notified of one federal grant that was not funded for FY2002 (Middle School
Student Assistance) and this needs to be deleted from the file. The total
increase to the School Grants Fund is $283,132. No local funds are
involved.
A description of the five (5) new grants as well as a brief description of
the three (3) grant revisions is included on the following pages.
Preparer:., ~~
Billy [~tgannaday, jr., Ed.[~
AttachmentS: ' Yes I I
Title: Superintendent
No #
_.0096
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Page 2 of 5
Evaluation/Analysis
New Grants
FY02 Chesterfield Community High School Charter Grant (Federal) $ 130,000
The Charter School Expansion Act was passed on October 22, 1998. The
purpose of CCHS is to provide opportunities for innovative instruction and
assessment while offering parents and students options within the school
division. The program establishes high standards for students, teachers,
and administrators.
CCPS will use grant funds from the Charter School Expansion Act to develop
programs to further enhance student success on the Standards of Learning
(SOL) tests. Computer equipment and software will be purchased to remediate
and test students who are functioning below grade level in math, reading,
and language arts. Funds will also be used to support programs designed to
provide career exploration, college preparation, and student services that
will promote success after high school. Funds will also be used to provide
evaluation, teacher training, and to purchase science equipment, a resource
library, and other equipment necessary to start-up the charter school at a
new location. CCPS received notification from the State Department of
Education on January 30, 2002 of the approval of the Charter School
application submitted by Chesterfield Community High School (CCHS). The
Federal Title X grant award is $130,000 and the budget period is December
29, 2001 through September 30, 2003.
FY02 VAEL/Civics Grant (Federal Title II)
$ 74,567
CCPS received notification from the State Department of Education of a grant
award for the English Literacy/Civics Education program in the amount of
$74,567. Funds are distributed to localities to support projects that
demonstrate effective practices in providing and increasing access to
English literacy. The goal of this program is to increase the learning
opportunities available to Chesterfield's limited English-speaking
population in the areas of literacy and civics to better prepare them for
productive citizenship.
An ESL learning center will provide a central location for English classes,
fa~nily literacy opportunities, computer access, and information and referral
to governmental and health resources. Funds will be used to enhance
learning opportunities for the growing ESL adult population by leasing
additional classroom space, and providing access to information through
specialized software and dedicated computers, which may be checked out for
home use. Full-time staffing is required to make the proposed ESL Learning
Center an effective and valuable resource to the community, including hours
of operation that will make it accessible to those who work non-traditional
hours. A new family literacy component will also be offered to students and
parents in the area with the greatest number of limited English-speaking
0000 /
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Page 3 of 5
families. This class will be taught by an experienced ESL teacher and
offered to parents and students with transportation being provided through
internal services. The grant award period is January 1, 2002 through June
30, 2003.
FY02 Technology Literacy Challenge Grant 2000 (Federal Goals 2000) $ 57,700
Technology as a teaching, learning and communicating tool is noted in the
Chesterfield County Public Schools (CCPS) Six-Year Improvement Plan (1999-
2004). Computer technolo~3y is no longer viewed as a luxury'but a necessity
for current students to ensure their success in the future. Computer skills
are essential for all students whether they are going on to further
education or into the WOrkplace. Learning to use computers effectively
begins early in a 'student's career and is refined throughout the student's
school career.
Principals in CCPS overwhelmingly believe technology is instrumental in
changing teaching and teaching strategies. The majority of principals also
believe the use of technology contributes to student learning as well as
changing the school organization. Since 1993 technology has been a major
program focus. CCPS has provided a range of training to individual
instructional personnel based on needs. The professional development
program requires all full-time instructional personnel to complete a minimum
of ten hours of computer training per year. A train-the-trainer activity is
part of this program and has contributed to the success of the program.
Because ccPs hires appr°ximately 300 to 350 new teachers per year and
because CCPS employs over 5,000 teachers, the task of training all teachers
to be technology users isI ongoing and enormous. The training needs outlined
in the six-year technology plan are met with this project. The Technology
Team Literacy Project will target middle school teachers who teach core
subjects and who are members of teaching teams.
These funds will be used to train middle school team teachers and special
education teachers who support the teams. The grant will provide stipend
pay for teachers to be trained outside of regular school hours, contracted
services to train teachers in integration of technology with core subjects,
laptop computers that can be loaned 'to teachers, and evaluation of the
project. The sites included in the project are four middle schools
(including the alternative school). This project will be a portion of a
broader professional development program in CCPS.
FY02 Special Ed SLIVER Grant (Federal IDEA) $138,399
State Superintendent's Memo #60 dated December 14, 2001 notified CCPS of
their award for the. FY02 Special Education SLIVER grant in the amount of
$138,399. This is a s~b-grant award through the Federal IDEA grant to
assist localities in p~oviding direct services and in making systemic
changes to improve results for children with disabilities. These funds are
being offered to local'~ties to assist in improving .special education
programs within the co~text of the' performance goals and indicators of
Virginia's State Improvem.ent Plan for Special Education.
098
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Page 4 of 5
FY02 Capital Area Workforce Grant (Federal Title II)
$ 21,625
CCPS will receive, federal Title II funds in FY02 to begin this grant in the
amount of $21,625. CCPS will serve the vocational training needs of
County youth who are either in danger of dropping out of school or enrolled
in alternative academic programs such as the Pre-GED, GED or the Literacy
Development program. The program will be offered to 40 students five days a
week. The curriculum will include a range of job preparedness components,
focusing on building skills such as developing a work ethic, maintaining
relationships, and conflict resolution, as well as more practical skills
such as filling out job applications~ job interviewing, and'dressing for a
work environment. Limited computer training will be included to expose
students to the job-b~sed technology they are likely to encounter.
Transportation to and from non-school locations will be provided as part of
the program. The anticipated outcome for this program is improved job
readiness as well as ~increased ability to anticipate and meet the
requirements of the working world.
Total new grants
$ 422,291
Revise~ Grants
Title I (Federal)
$ 60,994
CCPS received notification from the State Department of Education, through
Superintendent's Informational memo #183 dated December 21, 2001, of the
final basic authorization and supplementary concentration grants for Title I
for FY02. These additional funds will be distributed to the individual
Title I schools for use in those programs.
FY02 Middle School Student Assistance Grant (Federal) ($242,800)
CCPS received notificati6n from the State Department of Education that our
grant proposal was not approved, for FY02. This grant needs to be deleted
from the system.
FY02 Philip Morris Life Skills Training Grant (Local donation)$ 42,647
On September 17, 2001 CCPS received a letter of intent from Philip Morris to
fund the second year implementation of the Life Skills Training program.
Funding in the amount of $42,647 will be used to support the following for
middle school students: purchase of teacher manuals, student workbooks,
relaxation audiotapes, and biofeedback videos; funding to provide training
for 10 teachers/staff (stipends .and conference expenses); and,
administrative fees and indirect~ costs. This program was initiated to
provide curriculum to the school.system.to help reduce youth smoking.
Total revised grant~
$(139,159)
Total InStructio~ appropriation increase
$ 283,132
00099
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Page 5 of 5
Meeting Date: February 27. 2002 Number
Budclet and Mana.qement Comments:
On February 12, 2002 the School Board took action to request that the
Board of Supervisors increase the instruction appropriation category in
the amount of $283,132 ($42,647 in local and $240,485 in federal grant
funds) for various grant revisions as described in the agenda item
detail. The School Board continues to apply for and receive grant
awards through out the fiscal year. Also, grant notifications have
been received that differ from the adopted estimated grant award
amounts or grant requests have been denied that require accounting
changes for record keeping.
Preparer:
Rebecca T. Dickson
Title: Director, Budget & Management
0~05.00
VIRGINIA: At a regular meeting of the
Chesterfield County School Board held Tuesday
evening, February 12, 2002, at seven-thirty
o'clock in the Public Meeting Room at the
Chesterfield County Courthouse Complex
PRESENT:
James R. Schroeder, D.D.S., Chairman
Elizabeth B. Davis, Vice-Chairman
Lloyd A. Lenhart
Dianne E. Pettitt
Marshall W. Trammell, Jr.
RESOLUTION
On motion of Mrs. Davis, seconded by Mr. Lenhart, the School Board requests the Board of
Supervisors to approve an increase of $240,485 of federal revenue and an increase of $42,647 of
local revenue for a total increase of $283,132 to the Instruction appropriation category in the School
Grants Fund for the following grants:
Grant Title Funding Source Amount
Chesterfield Community High Charter School
VAEL/Civics Grant
Technology Literacy Challenge Grant 2000
Special Education SLIVER Grant
Capital Area Workforce Grant
Title I
Middle School Student Assistance Grant
Philip Morris Life Skills Training Grant
Federal $130,000
Federal 74,567
Federal 57,700
Federal 138,399
Federal 21,625
Federal 60,994
Federal (242,800)
Local 42,647
Total Increase to Instruction Appropriation category in School Grants $283,132
Billy K. ~lay, Jr., Super~endent
ooo .oa.
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Page 1 of 2
Meetin~l Date: February 27, 2002
Item Number:
8.C.12.
Subject:
Set a Public Hearing to Consider the Appropriation of $1,101,080 Refund
Received from the Riverside Regional Jail Authority
County Administrator's Comments:
unty Administrator:
Board Action Requested:
Staff requests the Board of Supervisors set March 27, 2002 for a public
hearing to consider the appropriation of the $1,101,080 per diem refund
received from the Riverside Regional Jail Authority. The refund will be used
to offset the expected shortfall in the regional jail budget.
Summary of Information:
This item requests that the Board of Supervisors set a public hearing to
consider the appropriation of $1,101,080 received from the Riverside Regional
Jail Authority (RRJA) as a refund for per diem payments. RRJA generated
excess funds last fiscal year in the amount of $3,772,929. Excess revenue
was generated by the RRJA selling beds to federal agencies, contracting with
the State to hold inmates under the Jail Contract Bed program, and selling
beds to non-member jurisdictions.
The Authority voted to refund, to participating localities, $2,772,929, of
which $1,101,080 is Chesterfield County's share. The remaining $1,000,000
will be deposited into the RRJA expansion fund.
Preparer:
Rebecca T. Dickson
Attachments:
~-] Yes
Title: Director, Bud.qet and Manaqement
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Page 2 of 2
Meetin~l Date: February27, 2002
Summary of Information (Cont.):
The average daily population for Chesterfield County at the Regional Jail in
FY2000 was 232.4. In FY2001, the average daily population was 282.4. The
average daily population for the current fiscal year, through October, is
442.5. Required relocation of inmates at the local jail due to a renovation
project and more arrests and subsequent convictions are two factors
contributing to the uncharacteristically high population at the Regional
Jail. It is believed that if current factors remain constant, the average
daily population for the twelve-month period could easily be 429, at a cost
of approximately $5,791,045. The current fiscal year budget for per diem
payments, based on the Regional Jail's budget submission, is $3,713,900.
This would cause overspending of more than $2 million. The refunded $1.1
million will be used to offset a portion of the projected overspending.
It is uncertain as to whether revenue excesses and refunds will be generated
in the future. As the member jurisdictions continue to increase their
utilization of beds, it will gradually force the removal of the federal
inmates, Jail Contract Beds, and non-member jurisdictions in order for the
facility to accommodate the needs of its member jurisdictions.
00010~
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Page 1 of 1
Meetin~l Date: February 27, 2002
Item Number: 8.c.13.a.
Subject:
Transfer $500 Each from the Bermuda, Clover Hill, Dale, Matoaca and
Midlothian District Improvement Funds (Total of $2,500) to the Fire
Department for the Junior Safety Camp
County Administrator's Comments:
County Administrator:
Board Action Requested:
The Board is requested to transfer $500 each from the Bermuda,
Clover Hill, Dale, Matoaca and Midlothian District Improvement
Funds, for a total of $2,500, to the Fire Department to help defray
the costs associated with the Junior Safety Camp which will be
offered by the Department's Fire and Life Safety Division.
Summary of Information:
Supervisors McHale, Warren, Miller, Humphrey and Barber are
requesting the Board to transfer $500 from their respective
District Improvement Funds for a total of $2,500 to the Fire
Department to help defray the costs associated with a Junior Safety
Camp which will be offered by the Department's Fire and Life Safety
Division. This camp is offered to teach life safety issues to
young people ages 8 to 13. The two-day camp will teach young
people about fire safety, medical issues, and personal safety.
Individuals from various County departments will lead the
activities acting as role models and teaching the value of
teamwork. Two camps will be offered in the summer of 2002.
For information regarding available balances in the District
Improvement Fund accounts, please reference the District
Improvement Fund Report.
Rebecca T. Dickson
Title: Director, Budget and Management
0422:$6352. !
Attachments:
Yes ['~ No
DISTRICT IMPROVEMENT FUNDS
APPLICATION
This application must be completed and signed before the County can consider
a request for funding with District Improvement Funds. Completing and signing this
form does not mean that you will receive funding or that the County can legally
consider your request. Virginia law places substantial restrictions on the authority of
the County to give public funds, such as District Improvement Funds, to private
persons or organizations and these restrictions may preclude the County's Board of
Supervisors from even considering your request.
What is the name of the applicant (person
or organization) making this funding
request?
Chesterfield Fire & EMS
If an organization is the applicant, what is
the nature and purpose of the organization?
(Also attach organization's most recent
articles of incorporation and/or bylaws to
application.)
N/A
What is the amount of funding you are
seeking?
$2,500.00
Describe in detail the funding request and
how the money, if approved, will be spent.
see attached
Is any County Department involved in the
project, event or program for which
you are seeking funds?
If this request for funding will not fully fund
your activity or program, what other
individuals or organizations will provide
the remainder of the funding?
Fire & EMS, Chesterfield Police Dept.,
Chesterfield Extension Offices,
Chesterfield Parks & Recreation Dept.
Chesterfield Professional Firefighters
and camper registration fees.
0407:23380.
Page 2
If applicant is an organization, answer the
following:
Is the organization a corporation?
Is the organization non-profit?
Is the organization tax-exempt?
Yes
Yes ×
Yes ×
No
x
What is the address of the applicant
making this funding request?
Chesterfield Fire & EMS
P. O. Box40
Chesterfield, VA 23832
What is the telephone number, fax number, (804) 748-1360
e-mail address of the applicant? (804) ?68-8766 (fax)
Signature of applicant. If you are signing on
behalf of an organization you must be the
president, vice-president, chairman or vice-
chairman of the organization.
Signature
of
an organization)
Title (if signil~i Or~ behalf
Printed Name
OO0106
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Page 1 of 2
Meetin~l Date:
February 27, 2002
Item Number:
8.C.13.b.
Subject:
Transfer of District Improvement Funds to the School Board for Post
Prom Celebrations
County Administrator's Comments:
County Administrator:
Board Action Requested:
The Board is requested to transfer $1800 from the Bermuda
District Improvement Fund, $2300 from the Clover Hill District
Improvement Fund, $1800 from the Dale District Improvement Fund,
$2300 from the Matoaca District Improvement Fund, and $2300 from
the Midlothian District Improvement Fund to the School Board for
drug and alcohol free post-prom celebrations subject to the
conditions described below.
Summary of Information:
Each Supervisor has requested the Board to transfer funds from
their respective District Improvement Fund to the School Board for
drug and alcohol free post-prom celebrations at various local area
high schools. The requested amounts from each fund are as follows:
Bermuda: $1,000 for Thomas Dale High School, $500 for L.C.
Bird High School, $100 for the Governor's School and $200 for
the Community High School.
Total: $1800
Preparer:
Clover Hill: $1,000 for Monacan High School, $1,000 for Clover
Hill High School, $100 for the Governor's School and $200 for
the Community High School.
Total: $2300
~._ '~ ~% [i~~ /iUe~ Director, Budget and Management
Rebecca T. Dickson 0422:56354.]
Attach ments:
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Page 2 of 2
Meetin l Date: February 27, 2002
Item Number:
Dale: $1,000 for Meadowbrook High School, $500 for L.C. Bird
High School, $100 for the Governor's School and $200 for the
Community High School.
Total: $1800
Matoac~: $1,000 for Manchester High School, $1,000 for Matoaca
High School, $100 for the Governor's School and $200 for the
Community High School.
Total: $2300
Midlothian: $1,000 for James River High School, $1,000 for
Midlothian High School, $100 for the Governor's School and
$200 for the Community High School.
Total: $2300
One request is from the Governor's School, which is located in
Richmond and includes 200 Chesterfield County students. Since the
Governor's School is a regional public school facility and is
legally independent of the Chesterfield County School Board, the
School Board will have to take action to authorize the transfer of
the total $500 payment to the Governor's School. Accordingly, if
the Board of Supervisors approves the transfer of the funds to the
School Board, the money cannot be given to the Governor's School
unless the School Board also takes action to approve the transfer
to the Governor's School.
The remaining requests for funds originally came from each school's
PTSA or Prom Committee. The County is not legally authorized to
transfer funds to these organizations or committees. The County
is authorized to transfer funds to the School Board but only if the
transfer is contingent on the money being placed in capital
projects or school operating accounts to be applied to appropriate
school-funded post-prom activities. The school system must also
write checks directly to vendors who will be supplying goods or
services to post-prom events.
For information regarding available
Improvement Fund accounts, please
Improvement Fund Report.
balances in the District
reference the District
O0010S
District Improvement Funds
2002 After Prom Celebrations
Bermuda District $1800:
$1,000 Thomas Dale High School
$500 L.C. BirdHigh School
$100 Governor's School
$ 200 Community High School
Clover Hill District- $2300
$1,000 Monacan High School
$1,000 Clover Hill High School
$ 100 Governor's School
$ 200 Community High School
Dale District-S1800
$1,000 Thomas Dale High School
$ 500 L.C. Bird High School
$ 100 Governor's School
$ 200 Community High School
Matoaca District -$2300
$1,000 Manchester High School
$1,000 Matoaca High School
$ 100 Governor's School
$ 200 Community High School
Midlothian District- $2300
$1,000 Midlothian High School
$1,000 James River High School
$ 100 Governor's School
$ 200 Community High School
Note: 2/19/02- Waiting in applications from Monacan High School - due date was
Feb. 15.
000 0
FEB-~-~008 03:3EP FROM:COSTELLO 80q 37B??6q
DISTRICT IMPROVEMENT FUNDS
This application must be completed and signed before the County can consider
a request for funding with District Improvement Funds. Completing and signing this
form does not mean that you will receive funding or that the County can legally
consider your request. Virginia law places substantial restrictions on the authority of
the County to give public funds, such as District Improvement Funds, to private
persons or organizations and these restrictions may preclude the County's Board of
Supervisors from even considering your request.
What is the name of the applicant (person
.or orgaoization) making this funding
request?
If an organization is the applicant, what is
the nature and purpose of the organization?
(Also attach organization's most recent
articles of incorporation and/or bylaws to
application.)
What is the amount of funding you are
seeking?
Describe in detail the funding request and
how the money, if approved, will be spent.
Is any County Department involved in the
proiect, event or program for which
you are seeking funds7
If this request for funding will not fully fund
your activity or program, what other
individuals or organizations will provide
the remainder of the funding?
0407:233g0.1
FEB-lg-2002 10:~2 884 Z?B7764
O001.S-O
P.02
FEB-14-2002 11:45P FROM:COSTELLO 804 3787764 TO:?lTG29T P:2xl~
Page 2
m
If applicant is an organization, answer the
following:
Is the organization a corporation?
Is the organization non-profit?
Is the organization tax-exempt?
Yes No
Yes ~ No
Yes ~" No
What is the address of the applicant
making this funding request7
What is the telephone number, fax number,
e-mail address of the applicant?
Signature of applicant. If you are signing on
behalf of an organization you must be the
president, vice-president, chairman or vice-
chairman of the organization.
Signature
Title {if signing on behalf of an organization)
Printed Name
FEB-14-2082 18:47 884:3787?64
97~,
FE~-07-2002
P.02
DISTRICT IMPROVEMENT FUNDS
APPLI CATI O N
This application must be completed and signed before the County can consider
a request for funding with District Improvement Funds. Completing and signing this
form does not mean that you will receive funding or that the County can legally
consider your request. Virginia law places substantial restrictions on the authority of
the County to give public funds, such as District Improvement Funds, to private
persons or organizations and these restrictions may preclude the County's Board of
Supervisors from even considering your request.
What is the name of the applicant (person
or organization) making this funding
request?
If an organization is the applicant, what is
the nature and purpose of the organization?
(Also attach organization's most recent
articles of incorporation and/or bylaws to
application.) ~ ~.~-~u~rn~ 9 .~¢ ~o,~ ( / '5 o_.
What is the amount of funding you are
seeking?
'~ 6-00
.,
Describe in detail the funding request and
how the money, if approved, will be s, pent, f?')orZey u~'// ~d 5,~,~-/' o~q ~
and ~ic.~l-~ ~ 0 ~G ~oad~ ~.r ~ pr~
is any County Department involved in the
project, event or program for which
you are seeking funds?
if this request for funding will not fully fund
your activity or program, what other
individuals or organizations will provide
the remainder of the funding?
040'/;23380, l
O001 Lk
FEB-O?-2002 12:23 99Z P.02
if applicant is an organization, answer the
following:
is the organization a corporation?
Is the organization non-profit?
Is the organization tax-exempt?
Yes No
Yes ',/" No
Yes ~ No
P. 8;5
Page 2
What is the address of the applicant
making this funding request?
;:5'~_ //¥ /77o
What is the telephone number, fax number,
e-mail address of the applicant?
Signature of applicant, if you are signing on
behalf of an organization you must be the
president, vice-president, chairman or vice-
chairman of the organization.
J
Title (if signing on behalf of an organization)
5~ !t~ l~7,oney
Printed Name
0407:23380. I
FEB-O?-2002 12:24 ~u4 P.03
FEB--18--02 0~:29 PM
JPHILLIPS*HAI]LEY--ROMAi~q¢
.', &--;P '7~.P ;,.,-I I ~ ,C.~ ~' ' "~ ~'"
8047651888
g-.?,-. ~_ ~-~:;.I.....
DISTRICT IMPROVEMENT FUNDS
P.02
:. '.~2..'~Z
This applicatio,1 mu;; ba comi:le~ed a;,.d signed before fl';e Co-..~ty can cons;der
a r~ue=t for ~ndlng ~ith District im~rovement Funds. Completing and signing
· lotto does not mean that you will receive ~nding or that the County' ca~ leg~lbl
consider yot~ request. Vil'glaia iow pla:es substantial res[ricfions o~ the aut. hoHt~ of
the Cou,ly to g~e public funds, such as District Improvement Funds, to private
pomons or organizations and t~,ese tes~rict~ns may pfsclude the Coupe's ~ard of
8upe~isors from even considering you~ request.
What is The name of the app!ican= (person
or urgar, ization} making thi~ funding
r~quest?
? an o.'ganlzadon is tLe app[icapt, wh~t is
~he aature ~nd purpose o[ the orgarfization?
(Also a~ach orgsnlzation's most recent
er~iclos of ii~corporat~on and/or bylaws Lo
What Is The amobnt of funding you are
seekinG?
De,tribe in d~";~il the funciing (geld'est and
' ' '
project, ev~T
you are seekin~
I! this request ."or ;unding will not fully fund
your act!vit¥ or program, wh~t other
indivtd~ls or u~ganizations will p~ovide
tt',e remainder of the fu~dinU?
000 3-4
FEB-18-2002 16:88 884?631888 95% P.02
JPHILLIPS~'HADLEY--ROMA i nc
8047~1888
P.O~
Ir ~i~i~ilc~nt i~ nn o,'ganlza:ion, 3,qsvver the
~olmw[ng:
is tho or3anizadon a corporatlor,?
Is the organization nOn-profit?
Is the organization tax-exempt?
~'" "~Z: ~o~
9
Wh~t is Lhe address of the app1>.'~nt
mak!r.g this funding request?
Whet is the telephone number, fax number,
SignaTure of app(icant. If you are sl~nlng on
behalf of an organizaUon you mus~ be The
pres;dm~ vlce-pre~dent. ~airma. or vlce-
~,.~ ~'~:xc;~ ..................
~e (~ Cgni~,g o¢ beh~f of a~
~inm~ Name
TOTR~ P.{~3
00011~
FEB-18-2002 16:88 884?631888 95X P.03
DISTRICT IMPROVEMENT FUNDS
APPLICATION
This application must be completed and signed before the County can consider
a request for funding with District Improvement Funds. Completing and signing this
form does not mean that you will receive funding or that the County can legally
consider your request. Virginia law places substantial restrictions on the authority of
the County to give public funds, such as District Improvement Funds, to private
persons or organizations and these restrictions may preclude the County's Board of
Supervisors from even considering your request.
What is the name of the applicant (person
or organization) making this funding
request?
If an organization is the applicant, what is
the nature and purpose of the organization?
(Also attach organization's most recent
articles of incorporation and/or bylaws to
application.~,
What is the amount of funding you are
seeking?
dj 1000.
Describe in detail the funding request and
how the money, if approved, will be spent.
~ .... . .... ) ~
n e n't
Is any County Department involved in the
project, event or program for which
you are seeking funds?
If this request for funding will not fully fund
your activity or program, what other
individuals or organizations will provide
the remainder of the funding?
0407:23380.1
Page 2
if applicant is an organization, answer the
following:
Is the organization a corporation?
Is the organization non-profit?
Is the organization tax-exempt?
Yes No v//
Yes v/ No
Yes ~/ No
What is the address of the applicant
making this funding request?
What is the telephone number, fax number,
e-mail address of the applicant?
Signature of applicant. If you are signing on
behalf of an organization you must be the
president, vice-president, chairman or vice-
chairman of the organization.
Signature U
Title (if J
signing on behalf of an organization)
Printed Nam~
0407:23380.1 O0 0~[--
DISTRICT IMPROVEMENT FUNDS
APPLICATION
This application must be completed and signed before the County can consider
a request for funding with District Improvement Funds. Completing and signing this
form does not mean that you will receive funding or that the County can legally
consider your request. Virginia law places substantial restrictions on the authority of
the County to give public funds, such as District Improvement Funds, to private
persons or organizations and these restrictions may preclude the County's Board of
Supervisors from even considering your request.
What is the name of the applicant (person
or organization) making this funding
request?
If an organization is the applicant, what is
the nature and purpose of the organization?
(Also attach organization's most recent
articles of incorporation and/or bylaws to
application.)
I
What is the amount of funding you are
seeking?
..
Describe in detail the funding request and
how the money if approved, will be spent.
o
Is any County Department involved in the
project, event or program for which
you are seeking funds?
If this request for funding will not fully fund
your activity or program, what other
individuals or organizations will provide
the remainder of the funding?
0407:23380.1
O001i
Page 2
If applicant is an organization, answer the
following:
Is the organization a corporation?
Is the organization non-profit?
Is the organization tax-exempt?
Yes
Yes J No
Yes V'" No
No J¸
What is the address of the applicant
making this funding request?
What is the telephone number, fax number,
e-mail address of the applicant?
Signature of applicant. If you are signing on
behalf of an organization you must be the
president, vice-president, chairman or vice-
chairman of the organization.
Signature '
Title (if signing o~ behalf of
Printed Name
0407:23380.1 0 00..t ~ D
DISTRICT IMPROVEMENT FUNDS
This application must be completed and signed before the County can consider
a request for funding with District Improvement Funds. Completing and signing this
form does not mean that you will receive funding or that the County can legally
consider your request. Virginia law places substantial restrictions on the authority of
the County to give public funds, such as District Improvement Funds, to private
persons or organizations and these restrictions may preclude the County's Board of
Supervisors from even considering your request.
What is the name of the applicant (person
or organization) making this funding
request?
If an organization is the applicant, what is
the nature and purpose of the organization?
(Also attach organization's most recent
articles of incorporation and/or bylaws to
application.)
What is the amount of funding you are
seeking?
~ i',dO0. Oo
,,
Describe in detail the funding request and
how the money, if approved, will be spent.
Is any County Department involved in the
project, event or program for which
you are seeking funds?
If this request for funding will not fully fund
your activity or program, what other
individuals or organizations will provide
the remainder of the funding?
0407:23380.1
000 .20
Page 2
If applicant is an organization, answer the
following:
Is the organization a corporation?
Is the organization non-profit?
Is the organization tax-exempt?
What is the address of the applicant
making this funding request?
Yes No
Yes ~ No
Yes y/ No
What is the telephone number, fax number,
e-mail address of the applicant?
I
Signature of applicant. If you are signing on
behalf of an organization you must be the
president, vice-president, chairman or vice-
chairman of the organization.
Sig'nat~e
,L .d. ~//zp 77'~,4 '-Po=,/' ?~ ~,~,.=, rr==,.s
Title (if signing on behalf of an organization)
Printed Name
0407:23380.1
000121
COMMONWEALTH PACKAINR a ?1762D?
APPLICAT!ON
This al~lication must be coml~leted and'. sig~ed before (he County can consider
a reque~ for fund~nO wlth District Improvement:.l~unds.: Oompleting and'si§ntng.this
form does not mean that you w~ll:rece~ve;ifund,Jn.g oI :that.the County. can ileg.lly
consider your request...Virginia law places subStar~tial restrictions on the authoritY of
the County to give public funds, ~uch as ;District ' ' ' ~ '
tmprovemen! Funds, to private
persons or or§am:,ations and thase restrictions may preclude Ihs County $ Board of
Supe,visors from, even.'iconsiderinfl Your'reqUeSt.'i ~
What is the name of the appf, icant (personli
.or orgar~iza~,ion} .making-this funding
request? .: :
If an orga.r~izatio:n is the applicant,· what isi
the nature and Purpose of the organization?
(Also attach organizatio.n's most recent
articles.of incorporation and/or bylawS;, to.
applicatiOn ¢, ~)~ ~ ., 1.
'
What is the amount of funding you are
seeking? ~:'
Describe in detaii the funding requestand , ~
how,the m0ney, iif approved,'will be sPerttl. . I '
5, Is any County Department in,volved in' ~he
project, event or,! program for which
you are seeking ~unds?
6. If this request fo~ funding will not fully funnel
your act!vi~y or i~rogram, what· other '.
individuals, or organizations v~'li provide
the remainder oflthe funclf, ng~
0~07:233g0. !
P. 02
FEB-05-2002 10:4G 2312123
02/05/02 11:30 COMMONWEALTH PACKAING a 9176297 NO.16J ~OJ
0407:23380.1
If applicant is ah organization, answer the
following:
Is the organization a corporation?
Is the organization non-profi~?
Is the organization tax-exempt?
What is the address of the applicantI
making this run,ling request?
Wha~ ;s:t~e teilePhone numberl fax n~mb~r,
e-mail a~dd{ress Of the applicant7
Page 2
No
No
No
I ' I
S gnature ~of applicant,
FEB-SS-2082 10:47
If yob are sig. n on
behal[ of~an o,rgamzatlon you must Ibe: the
president, vlce4pres!dent, chairman pr Vice-
chmrman 'pr th~ organization.
8ignatu(~l ' ;
Printed N~me ' '
:
2312123 96X P.03
DISTRICT IMPROVEMENT FUNDS
APPLICATION
This application must be completed and signed before the County can consider
a request for funding with District Improvement Funds. Completing and signing this
form does not mean that you will receive funding or that the County can legally
consider your request. Virginia law places substantial restrictions on the authority of
the County to give public funds, such as District Improvement Funds, to private
persons or organizations and these restrictions may preclude the County's Board of
Supervisors from even considering your request.
What is the name of the applicant (person
or organization) making this funding
request?
Clover Hill High School
(CHHS) Post Prom Committee
o
o
o
o
o
If an organization is the applicant, what is
the nature and purpose of the organization?
(Also attach organization's most recent
articles of incorporation and/or bylaws to
application.)
CHHS Post Prom Committee is a
group of parent volunteers whose purpose is to provide a safe, alcohol and drug-free
celebration after the prom for the teenagers of CHHS. In support of our goal, we also
provide drug and alcohol awareness for the parents of CHHS students and the communi _ty at
large.
What is the amount of funding you are
seeking?
$1,000.00- $1,800.00
Describe in detail the funding request and
how the money, if approved, will be spent.
We request this funding to assist
our organization with the $1,800.00 fee charged by Robious Sports and Fitness Center for
rental of their facility for our post prom celebration. See also "Background Information"
submitted with this application.
Is any County Department involved in the
project, event or program for which
you are seeking funds?
No
If this request for funding will not fully fund
your activity or program, what other
individuals or organizations will provide
the remainder of the funding?
Parent and business donations,
community grants and ticket
sales
If applicant is an organization, answer the
following:
000 4
o
°
Is the organization a corporation?
Is the organization non-profit?
Is the organization tax-exempt?
What is the address of the applicant
making this funding request?
What is the telephone number, fax number,
e-mail address of the applicant?
Yes No
Yes X No
Yes X No
X
Clover Hill High School Post Prom
Committee, c/o Evelyn Tucker
6021 Clayville Lane
Moseley, VA 23120
Evelyn Tucker,(phone) 739-0014
(email) fiona44444~aol.com
Signature of applicant. If you are signing on
behalf of an organization you must be the
president, vice-president, chairman or vice-
chairman of the organization.
S~iihre. , .
Title (if signing on behalf of an
organization)
Printed Name
O001a$
Feb 19 02 01:54p
WRLTOM
(B04)37S-5511
~U~, ?~. ?'/~
I)ISTRICT IMPROVEMENT FUNDS
p.!
p.3
This application must be COmplete~ and signed betore the Counw can ~nsi~r
. mq~st ~ ~n~g wi~ ~ct I~m~nt Fu~. ~le~g and sign~g
form d~. not ~ ~t you will re~e ~n~9 or that the ~unw can le~l~
co,er ~ur mque~. ~wg~ law ~s substan~l ~=J~ns ~ the authoriW of
the County ~ g~ public f~ds, ~cb as bis~tict Improve~n~ Funds, m
Supe~ ~m e~ conMdering ~m request.
What is the name of the applicant (person
or organization) making this funding
request?
If an organization is the applicant, what is
the nature and purpose of the organization?
(Also attach organization's most recent
articles of incorporation andfor bylaws to
What is the amount of funding you are
seeking?
Describe in detail the funding request and *TI , ,
l$ any County Department involved in the
project, event or program for which
you are seeking funds?
If this request for funding will not fully fund
your activity or program, what other
individuaJs or organizations will provide
1he remainder of the funding?
~40733}Bg.j
0001Z6
FEB-19-2002 14:32 804 379 5511 96% P.O1
Feb ~S O~ Ol:5~p
If applisarrt ;s an organization, answer the
following:
Is the organization a corporation?
Is the organization non-profit?
is the organization tax-exempt?
(804)379-5511 p.2
Yes / No
Yes. .// No
Yes /' No
Page 2
What is the address of the applicant
making this funding request?
What i~ the lelephone ~lumber, fax number,
e-mall address of the applicant?
Signature of applicant, If you are signing on
bahai! of an e;ganizatioA you must be the
president, vice-president, chakman or vice-
Signa~m~~-~,~' " .
~iI~IG (.If ~g~g on ~f of an
PHnted Name
0407:2~3110.I
000:1..;Z7
FEB-19-2002 14:32 804 3?9 55;11
P. 02
CHESTERFIELD CE}MM HS Fax:8047455715 Feb 19 2002 10:55
DISTRICT IMPROVEMENT FUNDS
P. 02
This application must be Completed and signed before the CounW can consider
a request for funding with District Improvement Funds. Completing end signing this
form does not mean that you will receive funding or that the' County can legally
consider your request. Virginia !aw places substantial restrictions on the authority of
the County to give public funds, such as District Improvement Funds, to private
persons or organizations and these restrictions may preclude the County's Board of
Supervisors from even considering your request.
· 1,
What is t.he..n.¢me 0_f. t.h~ aj;lplic_ant (person
or organization) making this funding
request?
If an organization Is the ~applicant, what is
the nature and purpose Of the organization7
(Aisc attach organizatioa's most recent
articles of incorporation iand/or bylaws t ~ ,
What is the amount of funding you are "~ I 00 O, ~
seeking?
4. Describe in detail the funding request and
~¢_~ho..vv..~.he ~9_.n.,eY, ]f appr.o, ve,d, .wil!..be,,spent.
o¢ Cs') o '
5. Is any County Department involved in the
project, event or program for which
you are seeking funds?
0407:/3380.1
If this request for funding will not fully fund
your activity or program, what other
individuals or organizations will provide
the remainder of the fudding?
FEB-19-2002 20:12
8047433713
94Z
P. 02
£HESTERFIELD COMM HS Fa×:8047455715 Feb 19 2002 10:55 ?.05
L
Page 2
If applicant is an organization, answer the
following:
Is the organization a corporation?
Is the organization non-prOfit?
Is the organization tax-exempt?
Yes No X
Yes /~ No
Yes __ ,X~ No
What is the address of the applicant
making thls funding request?
What is the telephone nu.n~ber, fax number,
e-mail address of the appli~cant?
0407:23380.1
FEB-19-2082 18:12
Signature of applicant. If you are signing on
behalf of an organization you must be the
president, vice-president, chairman or vice-
chairman of the/organization.
Title (if signing on behalf of an organization)
Printed Name
8847433713
P.83
Feb
20 02 lO:27a Monacan High (804)378-2489 p.3
DISTRICT IMPROVEMENT FUNDS ~/~.
This application must be completed and signed before the County can consider
a request for funding with District Improvement Funds. Completing and signing this
form does not mean that you will receive funding or that the County can legally
consider your request. Virginia law places substantial restrictions on the authority of
the County to give public funds, such as District improvement Funds, to private
persons or organizations and these restrictions may preclude the County's Board of
Supervisors from even considering your request.
What is the name of the applicant (person
or organization) making this funding
request?
If an organization is the applicant, what is
the nature and purpose of the organization?
(Also attach organization's most recent
articles of incorporation and/or bylaws to -~0.~
application.)
What is the amount of funding you are
seeking?
Describe in detail the funding request and
.h.l~__~w thpmoney, ~ approved, will be spent.
is any County Department involved in the
project, event or program for which
you are seeking funds?
If this request for funding will not fully fund
your activity or program, what other
individuals or organizations will provide
the remainder of the funding?
0407:23380.1
000:1-30
FEB-20-2002 10:50 804 378 2489 P.03
F~b 20 02 10:28a Monacan High (80~]378-2~89 ~.~
Page 2
If applicant is an organization, answer the
following:
Is the organization a corporation?
Is the organization non-profit?
Is the organization tax-exempt?
Yes ..... No
Yes ~,~"' No
Yes No
What is the address of the applicant
making this funding request?
What is the telephone number, fax number,
e-mail address of the applicant?
Signature of applicant. If you are signing on
behalf of an organization you must be the
president, vice-president, chairman or vice-
chairman of the organjz.ation.
Title {if signing on behalf of an organization)
0407:23380.1
000:1-3 -
FE]~-20-2002 :10:50 1904 3?8 2489 96X P.04
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Page 1 of 3
Meeting Date: February 27, 2002
I
Item Number:
8.C. 14.
Subject:
Amendment to the Board Minutes of December 19, 2001
Count_v Administrator's Comments'
County Administrator:
Board Action Rec!uested:
Amend the minutes of December 19, 2001 as indicated below to reflect a change
in the resolution for Alexandria Station to correct the route number for
Ryanwood Court which was incorrectly reported by the Virginia Department of
Transportation.
Summary of Information:
FROM:
"On motion of Mr. McHale, seconded by Mr. Miller, the Board adopted the
following resolution:
WHEREAS, the street described below is shown on plats recorded in the
Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Chesterfield County; and
WHEREAS, the Resident Engineer for the Virginia Department of
Transportation has advised this Board the street meets the requirements
established by the Subdivision Street Recuirements of the Virginia Department
of Transportation. -
Preparer:
Richard ~cElfish
Title: Director of Environmental Engineering
Attachments:
['-~ Yes
No
#
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Page 2 of 3
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that this Board requests the Virginia
Department of Transportation to add the street described below to the
secondary system of state highways, pursuant to ~ 33.1-229, Code Qf Virginia,
and the Department's SubdivisiQn Street Requirements.
AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that this Board guarantees a clear and
unrestricted right-of-way, as described, and any necessary easements for
cuts, fills and drainage.
AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that a certified copy of this resolution be
forwarded to the Resident Engineer for the Virginia Department of
Transportation.
Type ChanQe to the Secondary System of State HiQhwavs:
Basis for Change: Addition, New subdivision street
Statutory Reference: §33.1-229
Project: Alexandria Station
AdditiQn
·
From:
To:
Ryanwood Court, State Route Number: 4518
Westfieid Rd., ( Rt. 1002)
Cul-de-sac, a distance of: 0.04 miles.
Right-of-way record was filed on 9/3/1999 with the Office Of Clerk To Circuit Court in Pb. 106; Pg. 85, with
a width of 40 Ft.
Ayes: Humphrey, Miller, Barber, McHale and Warren.
Nays: None."
TO:
"On motion of Mr. McHale, seconded by Mr. Miller, the Board adopted the
following resolution:
WHEREAS, the street described below is shown on plats recorded in the
Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Chesterfield County; and
WHEREAS, the Resident Engineer for the Virginia Department of
Transportation has advised this Board the street meets the requirements
established by the Subdivision Street Recuirement$ of the Virginia Department
of Transportation.
000 83
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Page 3 of 3
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that this Board requests the Virginia
Department of Transportation to add the street described below to the
secondary system of state highways, pursuant to ~ 33.1-229, Code of Virgini2,
and the Department's Subdivision Street Requirements.
AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that this Board guarantees a clear and
unrestricted right-of-way, as described, and any necessary easements for
cuts, fills and drainage.
AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that a certified copy of this resolution
be forwarded to the Resident Engineer for the Virginia Department of
Transportation.
Tvoe Chanae to the Secondary System of State Hi~lhwavs: Addition
Basis for Change: Addition, New subdivision street
Statutory Reference: §33.1-229
Project: Alexandria Station
·
From:
To:
Ryanwood Court, State Route Number: 4519
Westfleld Rd., ( Rt. 1002)
Cul-de-sac, a distance of: 0.04 miles.
Right-of-way record was filed on 9/3/1999 with the Office Of Clerk To Circuit Court in Pb.106; Pg. 85, with
a width of 40 Ft.
Ayes: Humphrey, Miller, Barber, McHale and Warren.
Nays: None."
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Page 1 of 2
Meetin~l Date:
February 27, 2002
Item Number: 8.C.15.
Subiect:
Authorize a Co-applicant for Case 01SN0121, which was Previously
Initiated by the Board of Supervisors
County Administrator: ~
Board Action Requested:
Authorize The Dankos Family Trust to be a Co-applicant for Case
01SN0121, which was Previously Initiated by the Board of
Supervisors.
Summary of Information:
On June 28, 2000, the Board of Supervisors initiated a zoning
application for that area identified on the attached map as Case
01SN0121. Mr. Warren requested that the Board initiate the
application because there would be benefits to the County relating
to improvements to Clover Hill High School and overall water
quality issues in the area. The case has been deferred several
times by the Planning Commission while the owners of the property
on which the Board initiated zoning discussed their proposal with
area residents and a representative of the commercial property to.
the west (see attached map-Dankos Property)
As a result of these meetings, it has been concluded by area
residents, and the Clover Hill Commissioner and Supervisor that a
coordinated development of the property with the Dankos property
would best serve the area. The most efficient and comprehensive
method to accomplish this goal would be to allow the Dankos
Preparer:
Thomas E. Jacobson
Title: Director of Planning
C: DATA/AGENDA/2002/FEB27.4/GOK
Attachments:
Ycs
~-~No
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Page 2 of 2
property to be included in the Board's application. The co-
applicant and would be responsible for all zoning fees related to
that part of the application.
Mr. Warren, Clover Hill Supervisor, requests that the Board of
Supervisors authorize The Dankos Family Trust to be a co-applicant
in Case 01SN0121 for the purpose of including additional property
to the west of the property on which the Board initiated zoning
action previously.
C'3 ~ ¢~-3
A
17~ C.U;P.D.
Sheet #: 15
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Page I of I
Meetin~l Date: February27, 2002
Item Number: 8.C. 16.
Subject:
Proposed Zoning Ordinance Amendment Relating to Lighting in A, R, R-
TH, R-MF or MH Districts for Non-Residential Uses
County Administrator's Comments:
County Administrator:
Board Action Requested:
Request that the Planning Commission study and recommend an ordinance
amendment for lighting standards in A, R, R-TH, R-MF or MH Districts
for Non-Residential Use and; allow Planning Commission to take time
necessary to complete the study and recommendation.
Summary of Information:
Mr. Warren has expressed concerns that the Zoning Ordinance does not
address lighting standards for non-residential uses in districts
other than in office, commercial and industrial districts. For
example, schools and churches in such districts have no lighting
standards so as to minimize the impact on adjacent residential uses.
Preparer
Thomas E. Jacobson
Title:
Director of Planninq
A:DATA/AG ENDA/2002/FEB27.4
Attachments:
[~-] Yes
No
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Page 1 of 2
Meeting Date: February 27, 2002
Item Number: 8.c.17.
Sub_iect:
Amendment to Board Minutes of January 23, 2002
County_ Administrator's Comments:
County Administrator:
Board Action Requested;
Amend the minutes of January 23, 2002 to clarify that the public hearing for
Case 01SN0189 remained open and was deferred until February 27, 2002.
Summary_ of Information;
Amend the minutes as follows:
There being no one else to speak to the request, the p~blic he&rin~ wa=
t-~=~-~ Mr. Miller closed the public debate.
o o o
Mrs. Humphrey expressed concerns that one property owner should not be
required to absorb the cost of the Powhite Parkway Extension. She stated
that funding for the larger road projects such as the Powhite Parkway
Extension and the Route 360 widening should be the state's responsibility.
Title:Clerk to the Board of Supervisors
Attachments:
Yes
No
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Page 2 of 2
She further stated that the applicant has offered an alternative that will
provide traffic relief for areas such as Woodlake, Foxcraft, Magnolia Green
and Route 360 West. She stated that she feels the road proposed by the
applicant will be in place much sooner than the Powhite Parkway Extension.
She further stated that because Mr. Barber and Mr. Miller have indicated
their desire for a deferral and Mr. Warren has indicated that he does not
support the proposal, she will request a deferral for 30 days and suggested
that the applicant continue to work with staff to resolve the issues raised.
On motion of Mrs. Humphrey, seconded by Mr. McHale, the Board deferred Case
01SN0189 until February 27, 2002.
Ayes: Miller, Warren, Barber, Humphrey and McHale.
Nays: None.
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Page I of 3
Meetin~l Date: February 27, 2002 Item Number:
Subiect: Developer Water and Sewer Contracts
County Administrator's Comments:
County Administrator:
Board Action Requested: The Board of Supervisors has authorized the County
Administrator to execute water and/or sewer contracts between the County and
the Developer where there are no County funds involved.
The report is submitted to the Board members as information.
Summary of Information:
The following water and sewer contracts were executed by the County
Administrator:
Contract Number:
Project Name:
98-0064
Bermuda Crossroads Market Place Shopping Center
Developer:
Bermuda Crossroads Marketplace LC
Contractor:
Gerald K. Moody
Contract Amount:
Water Improvements -
Wastewater Improvements -
$237,250.77
$94,017.64
District: Bermuda
Preparer:
Title:
Director of Utilities
Attachments:
~-] Yes
No
Agenda Item
February 27, 2002
Page 2
o
Contract Number:
Project Name:
Developer:
Contractor:
Contract Amount:
District:
Contract Number:
Project Name:
Developer:
Contractor:
Contract Amount:
District:
Contract Number:
Project Name:
Developer:
Contractor:
Contract Amount:
District:
Contract Number:
Project Name:
Developer:
Contractor:
Contract Amount:
District:
00-0156
Allgood - Deerleaf Court
Metro Concrete Company Incorporated
Mayton Construction Incorporated
Water Improvements -
Clover Hill
$5,630.00
01-0162
Sheetz-Huguenot Village
Huguenot Village Acquisition Company, LLC
Bookman Construction Company
Water Improvements -
Midlothian
$7,800.00
01-0210
First Market Bank @ Harbor Pointe
First Market Bank
Duke Contracting of Virginia, Inc.
Water Improvements -
Wastewater Improvements -
Clover Hill
$14,590.00
$1,490.00
01-0237
Goddard School - Krause Road
Katherman and Company, Incorporated
Bookman Construction Company
Water Improvements -
Midlothian
$35,800.00
000136
Agenda Item
February 27, 2002
Page 3
o
Contract Number:
Project Name:
Developer:
Contractor:
Contract Amount:
District:
01-0239
Founders Bridge, Section 1 (Chesterfield)
Gray Land and Development Company, LLC
Castle Equipment Corporation
Water Improvements -
Wastewater Improvements -
Midlothian
$75,780.00
$273,770.70
Contract Number:
Project Name:
Developer:
Contractor:
Contract Amount:
District:
01-0246
Providence Golf Course Water Line Extension
P. & R. Associates, LLC
Coastal Utilities, Incorporated
Water Improvements -
Clover Hill
$27,356.00
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Page I of I
Su~ect;
Status of General Fund Balance, Reserve for Future Capital Projects,
District Improvement Fund, and Lease Purchases
Coun~ Administrator's Comment~.
County Administrator:
Board Action Reauested'
Summary of Information.
Title: County Administr~,tgr
BOARD
MEETING
DATE
07/01/01
11/14/01
11/14/01
11/14/01
11/14/01
11/14/01
11/14/01
11/14/01
11/14/01
11/14/01 &
12/19/01
11/14/01 &
12/19/01
11/14/01 &
12/19/01
11/14/01 &
12/19/01
11/14/01 &
12/19/01
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
GENERAL FUND BALANCE
February 27, 2002
DESCRIPTION
FY2002 Actual Beginning Fund Balance
Designation for Health Center Commission
Designate excess revenue (County) for non-
recurring items in FY2003
Designate excess expenditures (County) for non-
recurring items in FY2003
Designate excess revenue (Schools) for non-
recurring items in FY2003
FY01 Results of Operations - Schools unspent
General Fund Transfer
FY01 Results of Operations - FY02 One cent tax
rate decrease - Jan. - June (County)
FY01 Results of Operations - FY02 One cent tax
rate decrease - Jan. - June (Schools)
FY01 Results of Operations - Schools - Bailey
Bridge Middle School Design
FY01 Results of Operations - Fire
FY01 Results of Operations - Police
FY01 Results of Operations - Libraries
FY01 Results of Operations - Environmental
Management Program
FY01 Results of Operations - CSA Shortfall
AMOUNT
(1,5OO,OOO)
(2,636,670)
(9,441)
(6,088,836)
(1,232)
(242,285)
(546,715)
(250,000)
(626,100)
(500,000)
(90,600)
(3o0,o00)
(286,635)
BALANCE
$48,351,214
$46,851,214
$44,214,544
$44,205,103
$38,116,267
$38,115,035
$37,872,750
$37,326,035
$37,076,035
$36,449,935
$35,949,935
$35,859,335
$35,559,335
$35,272,700
000139
Board
Meeting
Date
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
RESERVE FOR FUTURE CAPITAL PROJECTS
TRADITIONALLY FUNDED BY DEBT
February 27, 2002
Description
FOR FISCAL YEAR 2002 BEGINNING JULY 1, 2001
4/4/01
FY02 Budgeted Addition
4/4/01
FY02 Capital Projects
7/25/01
County's Master Plan Update
9/26/01
Video equipment for Circuit and General
District Courts
10/24/01
360 West Corridor Plan
11/14/01
Building Improvements (County Administration)
11/14/01
Security Enhancements (MI-I/MR and County
Administration)
Amount
8,800,000
(7,579,700)
(85,000)
(90,000)
(?o,ooo)
(17o,ooo)
(lO7,OOO)
Balance
9,988,012
2,408,312
2,323,312
2,233,312
2,163,312
1,993,312
1,886,312
000 140
000~.4~
Prepared by
Accounting Department
January 31, 2002
Date
Began
04/99
06/99
1/01
03/01
04/01
11/00
09/01
SCHEDULE OF CAPITALIZED LEASE PURCHASES
APPROVED AND EXECUTED
Description
Public Facility Lease - Juvenile Courts Project
School Copier Lease #1 - Manchester High School
Certificates of Participation/
Building Construction, Expansion and Renovation;
Acquisition/Installation of Systems
Telephone System Upgrade
School Copier Lease #2 - Manchester High School
School Copier Lease #3 - Chester Middle School
School Server Lease
TOTAL APPROVED
AND EXECUTED
Original
Amount
$16,100,000
43,587
13,725,000
1,222,411
20,268
20,268
278,372
$31.409.906
Date
Ends
11/19
05/04
11/21
03/05
03/06
09/05
07/05
PENDING EXECUTION
Description
None
Approved
Outstanding
Balance
01/31/02
$14,490,000
22,507
13,725,000
585,350
17,519
15,763
216,106
$29,072,245
Amount
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Page I of I
Meeting Date:
February 27, 2002
Sub_iect;
Roads Accepted into the State Secondary System
County_ Administrator's Comments;
Item Number: lO.C.
County Administrator:
Board Action Re~_uested:
Summary of Information:
Preparer: ~-~ ~
Lisa H. Elko
Attachments:
¥cs
Title:
Clerk to the Board
.~00~.44
9oo~.4~
~ 7
~0014
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Page 1 of 1
Meetin~l Date:
Subject:
February 27, 2002
Item Number:
Public Hearing to Consider Ordinance Approving the Joint Powers Association
(JPA) Agreement
County Administrator's Comments:
County Administrator:
Board Action Requested:
Adoption of an ordinance approving the
(JPA)Agreement following the Public Hearing.
Joint Powers
Association
Summary of Information:
Chesterfield County has, for more than 2 decades, partnered with other local
governments for the purpose of purchasing electric supply. Up until now,
this function was performed by a committee established by VML/VaCo. This
"Power Steering Committee" established a pilot program in 2001 to procure
power generated on a limited basis. This "Pilot JPA" resulted in savings of
over $39,000 for Chesterfield County. This "Power Steering Committee" is
being formalized into the Virginia Energy Purchasing Governmental Association
(VEPGA). To continue participating in this power procurement initiative, we
must join VEPGA, which is forming through the use of a Joint Powers
Agreement. The ongoing advantages include cost sharing for legal and
consulting fees, potential savings associated with aggregating purchasing
power, and leveraging the experience and knowledge gained by other
municipalities. Under the JPA, localities are required to hold a Public
Hearing and adopt an ordinance approving the JPA Agreement.
Preparer:
Francis M. Pita'r~
Title: Director of General Services
Attachments:
Yes [---] No
000~.48
AN ORDINANCE TO ESTABLISH AND APPROVE
A JOINT POWERS ASSOCIATION AGREEMENT
TO PERMIT JOINT PURCHASES OF ELECTRICITY
SUPPLY AND DISTRIBUTION
WHEREAS, the VML/VACo Virginia Power Steering Committee (the "Committee"),
composed of representatives of Chesterfield County and other local governments and political
subdivisions of the Commonwealth, has for over several decades negotiated on behalf of such
governmental units a standard form contract for their purchase of electricity supply and delivery
service from Virginia Electric and Power Company ("Virginia Power") as a sole source provider;
and
WHEREAS, political subdivisions of the Commonwealth of Virginia are authorized under
Virginia law to exercise jointly powers that they otherwise are authorized to exercise independently,
and the terms and conditions of such authorization are currently set forth in Sections 15.2-1300, et
seq. of the Virginia Code (the "Joint Powers Act"); and
WHEREAS, the Virginia Electric Utility Restructuring Act (the "Restructuring Act") further
authorizes municipalities and other political subdivisions in the Commonwealth to aggregate their
electricity supply requirements for the purpose of their joint purchase of such requirements from
licensed suppliers, and the Restructuring Act provides that such aggregation shall not require
licensure; and
WHEREAS, the Virginia Public Procurement Act (the "Procurement Act") exempts from
its competitive sealed bidding and competitive negotiation requirements (the "Requirements") the
joint procurement by public bodies, utilizing competitive principles, of electric utility services
purchased through member associations under the conditions set forth in the Procurement Act; and
WHEREAS, the Committee recommends that the aggregation and procurement of electric
000J.49
supply, electric delivery, and other energy-related services ("Energy Services") be effectuated as
provided in the Joint Powers Association Agreement, a copy of which is attached to and made part
of this Ordinance (the "Joint Powers Agreement"), in accordance with applicable provisions of the
Procurement Act, such as the utilization of competitive principles pursuant to an exemption from
the Requirements; and
WHEREAS, the Committee also recommends that the other services provided by the
Committee to its members be effectuated as provided in the Joint Powers Agreement, with such
services consisting of (i) assistance in implementing standard form contracts for the purchase of
services from incumbent electricity utilities, (ii) education of members regarding electricity
procurement issues, (iii) monitoring of legal and regulatory developments affecting the provision of
electricity service to local governments, and (iv) hiring of consultants and legal counsel to assist in
its provisions of the foregoing services ("Steering Committee Services ").
WHEREAS, it appearing to the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County that the joint
procurement of the Energy Services pursuant to the Joint Powers Agreement and the provision of
Steering Committee Services pursuant to the Joint Powers Agreement is in the best interests of
Chesterfield County.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
OF CHESTERFIELD COUNTY that:
(1) Competitive sealed bidding and competitive negotiation for the procurement of
Energy Services are not fiscally advantageous to the public because the procurement process for
Energy Services must be flexible enough to respond to quickly changing market conditions in which
energy prices can fluctuate considerably on a daily or even hourly basis.
2
000 0
(2)
Powers Agreement is hereby approved.
(3) The provision of Steering Committee
Agreement is hereby approved.
The aggregation and joint procurement of the Energy Services pursuant to the Joint
Services pursuant to the Joint Powers
(4) The Joint Powers Agreement and the performance of the terms and conditions thereof
on behalf of Chesterfield County are hereby authorized and approved.
(5) The County Administrator is hereby authorized and directed to execute and deliver
the Joint Powers Agreement on behalf of Chesterfield County in substantially the form presented at
this meeting and attached to this ordinance.
(6) The payment obligations of Chesterfield County pursuant to the provisions hereof and
the Joint Powers Agreement shall be subject to annual appropriation of requisite funds therefor by
the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County.
(7) This Ordinance shall take effect immediately upon adoption.
0422:56240.1 3
0002t5 .
An Affiliate of Media General
Advertising Affidavit
(This is not a bill Please pay from invoice)
P, O, Box 85333
Richmond, Virginia 23293~0001
(804) 649~6000
02/20/20()2
Date Code Description Ad Size Total Cost
TAKE NOTICF, TAKE NOTICF, THAT THE I~OARD O 2_00 x 23 00
454.4R
ATTACH
Media General Operations, Inc.
Publisher of
THE RICHMOND TIMES-DISPATCH
This is to certify that the attached TAKF, NC)T/'CETA~'F, NC)T'[Ct
was published by Richmond Newspapers, Inc. in the Cityof Richmond,
State of Virginia, on the following dates:
02/13/2002 02/20/2002
HERE
The first insertion being given ....
Sworn to and subscribed before
Notary Public
State of Virg]
City of Richmond
My Commission expires
02/] 3/2DD2
S u pervisor
THIS IS NOT A BILL. PLEASE PAY FROM INVOICE. THANK YOU
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Page I of I
Meetin~l Date: February27, 2002 Item Number: 18.
Sub!ect:
Adjournment and Notice of Next Scheduled Meeting of the Board
of Supervisors
County Administrator's Comments:
County Administrator:
Board Action Requested:
Summary of Information:
Motion of adjournment and notice of next scheduled meeting to be held on
March 11, 2002 at 5:00 p.m.
Preparer:~O~ ~~'~
Lisa H. Elko
Attachments:
[---~ Yes
Title:
No
~rk to the Board