Loading...
70-13CS " " . , , , , , , ~'* , , , , . , . , ~F<lr office only . . , .CASE NO. 70_/3C3 . , . , "'REVIEW BY p, C, . . . . . , . . . . , . . . . . . , , . . APPLICATION FOR AMENDMENT TO THE CHESTERFIELD COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE C}, TELEPHONE NO. ~ The followin~ information 1s to be typed or printed 3, J; ;YLt./'p// qr Rd.I'- 1/ p !led #ll ./)~tf,~ !Ii '7/ / NAME OF PRESENT OWNER OF PROPERTY ON WHICH THIS REQUEST WILL 1) A) B) MAILING ADDRESS: NAME OF APPLICANT: D) OCCUR: J. J. Mitchell. Jr. E} MAILING ADDRESS: F) TELEPHONE NO.: .. *" *. ". "." 2) IF THE APPLICANT IS NOT THE OW~~R OF THE PROPERTY IN QUESTION, EXPLAIN: (Copy of pending contract or option agreement shall be attached hereto and made a part of this application.) Applicant is owner " '" '" '" * " * '" " " '" 3) LOCATION OF PROPERTY IN QUESTION (Following information to be obtained by the applicant from the Office of the County Asseasor) A) ~UGISTERIAL DISTRICT Bermuda B) TAX MAP NO. E) BLOCK NO. r' II;~- C) SEC. NO. D) SUBDIVISION NO, F) LOT OR PARCEL NO. rJ) STREET ADDRESS A PLAT OF THIS PROPERTY SHALL BE ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART OF THIS APPLICATION SHOWING THE FOLLOWING: LOCATION BY REFERENCE TO NEAREST ROAD INTERSECTION DIMENSIONS OF SITE ........... ..... (PAGE 1) " , . . ~) THE PET!TIONER REQUESTS THAT THE ZONING ORDINANCE BE Al4ENDED TO RECLASSIFY THIS PROPERTY FROM Agriculture NO.lNAME TO IndustriM NO.lNA . . * * * * * . . * * 5) STATE THE REASON FOR THIS REQUEST: The prop~rtv ho~ been ~pt1~ned to an inaustr;aJ compar,y for the pUrpose or ~rectinR ~ nl~nt to be used as a light m~tal rnanufaoturinR faei.litv * * * * * * * ~ . * * 6) STATE HOW THIS REQUEST WILL NOT BE MATERIALLY DETRIMENTAL TO THE ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS OR TIm SURROUNDING NEIGHBORHOOD: The propos€d in<lustry has agr0.,{j to leave standillg " bQundrv of timber around the manufacturing plant to serve as a buff~r for the protection of the surrounding property. The material to be manufactured in this plant will be light ga~e metal and trr~ operat~ng noise will not be objectionable beyond the property boundries. * * * * 4 * * . R R * 7) STATE ANY EXISTING USE PERMIT OR VARIANCE GRANTED PREVIOUSLY ON THE PARCEL IN QUESTION: NONE ~ * * , . ~ " ~ If * . 8) EXISTING LAND USE: Timbered and r."t ir. ~<,ti".. n~". (PAGE 2) . . 9) GIVE NAMES OF ALL OWNERS ADJACENT, ACROSS THE ROAD OR RlaHWAY AND FACING THE PROPERTY AND ANY OWNERS ACROSS ANY RAILROAD RIGHT_ OF WAY FROM SUCH PROPERTY. IN THE EVENT THE PROPERTY AFFECTED IS SITUATED AT OR WITHIN 100 FEET ON THE INTERSECTION OF ANY TWO OR MORE ROADS OR HIGHWAYS, AT OR WITHIN ONE HUNDRED FEET OF THE INTERSECTION OF ANY ROAD OR HIGHWAY WITH A RAILROAD RIGHT- OF-WAY OR AT OR WITHIN ONE HUNDRED FEET OF THE INTERSECTION OF THE RIGHTS-OF-WAY OF ANY TWO RAILROADS, GIVE NAMES OF PROPERTY OWNERS AT ALL CORNERS OF ANY SUCH INTERSECTION. A) PROPERTY OWNER'S NAME: J. Newsom MAILING ADDRESS: Route #1, Col",.,iaJo F\ei"llts. Va TAX 14AP NO.: SEC. NO.: SUBDIVISION NO.: BLOCK NO.; LOT OR PARCEL NO" B) PROPERTY OWNER'S NAME: Jasper Scott MAILING ADDRESS: TAX MAP NO.: BLOCK NO.: RQute #1. Colonial Heights, Va. SEC. NO.: SUBDIVISION NO.: LOT OR PARCEL NO.: c) PROPERTY OWNER'S NAME:C. W. Fisher MAILING ADDRESS: Rout" 1/1, Box lOll. Colonial Ilej",,,~~ Va. TAX MAP NO.: BLOCK NO.: _SEC. NO.: SUBDIVISION NO.: LOT OR PARCEL NO. : D) PROPERTY OWNER'S NAME:Donald Deems MAILING ADDRESS: TAX MAP NO.: BLOCK NO.: Route 1>'1, 8"" lO?C. Colon;"l H"igh~~, )If'.. SEC. NO.: SUBDIVISION NO.: LOT OR PARCEL NO.: (PAGE 3) " . . E) PROPERTY OWNER'S NAME: H, M, P"rr~$ll MAILING ADDRESS: Route #1. e"" 107 Col"ni~l l-lp,\;"t~, V., TAX MAP NO.; SEC. NO.: SUBDIVISION NO. ; BLOCK NO.: LOT OR PARCEL NO,: F) PROPERTY OWNER'S NP.ME: F, W, Fiala MAILING ADDRESS: Route itl, B" 1il7A, Colonial Bel "ht~, Yo. TAX J1AP NO.' SEC. NO.: SUBDIVISION NO.: BLOCK NO.: LOT OR PARCEL NO. : 0) PROPERTY OWNER'S NAME: W, H, Smith MAILING ADDRESS: Route "', Box 1078, Colonial Heights, V., TAX MAP NO.: SEC. NO.: SUBDIVISION NO.: BLOCK NO. , LOT OR PARCEL ~W, : H) ,PROPERTY OWNER'S NAME: L, C, Griffin MAILING ADDRESS: Route n, 00" 107M, Colonial Heights, Vo, TAX MAP IIO. : SEC. NO.: SUBDIVISION NO. : BLOCK NO.: LOT OR PARCEL NO.: 1) PROPERTY OWNER'S NAME: B, ", Goodyear MAILING ADDRESS, TAX MAP NO.: BLOCK NO, : Route #1, Box loeB, CO'QniaJ Hej~ht~, Va. SEC. NO.: SUBDIVISION NO.: LOT OR PARCEL NO.: J) PROPERTY OwllER'S NANE: Va. Dr!- (/'//'lJd1/1/; lri:J i..f:. z/;ucrf cr., MAILING ADDRESS: 13.,: 39/) 9~j/'{)Q.. TAX NAP NO.: SEC. NO.: SUBDIVIS!ONNO.: BLOCK NO.: LOT OR PARCEL NO.: (PAGE ~) , . . . 10) THE APPLICANT HEREWITH DEPOSITS THE SUM OF TWENTY DOLLARS ($20.00) ATTACHED TO THIS APPLICATION, TO PAY THE COST OF ADVERTISING NOTICE OF THE HEARING OF SAID BOARD TO ACT ON THIS REQUEST. CHECK OR MONEY ORDER MUST BE MADE PAYABLE TO, TREASURER, COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD. IIWE HEREBY DEPOSE AND SAY THAT ALL OF THE ABOVE STATE~ENTS AND THE STATEMENTS CONTAINED IN ANY EXHIBITS TRANSMITTED ARE TRUE. Feb,'uary 27 19....12... U~ (Same name as used in item i-A, page 1.) MY COMMISSION EXPIRES :J..bCi , ~ SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME (PAGE 5) '10~f3C. AppomatloMasin Industrial Developmel Corporation ..C~HH '1IIlC'~G ,,. M(l~"(l, nun 13'.1911 P. O. BOX 707 P~lERS~URG. VA. 23a03 March l2, uno TO. CHESTERFIELD COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION FROM, The Appomattox Basin Industrial DeveLopment Corporation BY, W. H. Caldweli The Appomattox Basin Industrial Development Corporation t~roug~ its program ~as been instrumental in jnteresti~g a man~ ufacturing company jn locatin~ a plant in Chest~rfiola CQUnty on property own~d by Mr. J. J. Mitchell. Application has been rnad~ by Mr. Mitch~ll for rezoning this site from agriculture to ''''''''.If,,cturin~. Mr. Mitchell has r.,,~ questeo that ABIDCD r~present ~im at thjs hearing. The company,that has taken an option on Mr. Mitchell's lano anQ is planning to lco~te a manufacturing facility there, is a suhstantial company with other plants anti thts is ~n expansion of tbeir program. The plant propC5~0 to be located here will fab- ricate small and meotum si~e metal components. Th~ cpe~ation wl11 not create any coer or smoke that could be objectionable to the surrcunding area. 1'he operation will,""'''" some metal ",or)dng equip- me"twhichwill rnake a certa:tnarnount otnoise but not unduly louo. Inorocr to ellrninate "'" much of this noise as possible, the oom9any plans to leave a hut fer strip of forost a~ound the plant "ndan.l'noisoc,"""teoby the plant sllouldnot be hea,.d beyono this boundry, It is their plan to operate one S hours shift ~ach oay and, as tar as they "now now, there will not be any "xtra shifts or night operations. Tlte employment in the plant will be in tlte neighhor~ bootio! I()Oat th"beginning, as SOOn as it can be built up to that amount, and eventually through expansion may reach as much as 300. The necessary arrangements will be made to dispose of any sew~ge wast" thet are present and, we are lold that, th~re is no jn(jus'trial waste f~om the operaticn. It is our hope that you will give favorable oonsid~ration to this sO that we Can ado anotltor manufacturing plant to the grcwing list in Chesterfield County. R711J;!JJ!~ W. !1ff:'CRawell, E",ecutivo Directol' WIlC/rnlb ~ . . Route 1, Box 108 Colonial Heights, Virginia ['larch 17, 1970 Nr. Howard A. Mayo, Jr:. County Planner Chesterfield Courthouse Chesterfield, Virginia 23832 SUBJI3CT, Case 10-13C Dear Me. Mayo: In connection vlith Case 70-13C I would like anSwerS to the following: 1. Ex,"ctly what type operation is to be placed on t(le 50 acre parcel? 2. Villat offect will this have on my property, tax-wise Or value-wise? J. What type of (1ois", is involved'? Will this be only Juring daylight working. hours? Will the,e be shift work with continuous noise and heavy traffic? If there is to be a great deal of noise as I believe there will be, is there any stipulation for sound-proofing the building7 4. \'lhat will be the traffic situation? vthy:is it not possible to use a back road for this operation and thus eliminate the, traffic on the street in front of our hon":!,,? 5. If the gas line is to be used for a road, how close to my PCC>98rty will the entrance to this come? G. How will drainage be handled? If a road is constructed behind my property wnl my property be endangered with flooding during a heavy rainfall? 7. Win lights from this operatio" be So bright as to be a nuisance to my household? 8. How will sewage be handled? 9. Will there .be any smoke Or odors? 10. What type of personnel will be employed? 11. Since the ope4ation originally had stated they required 30 acreS and have now acquired 50! acres, ~Jny is it not possible the plant be located further back from Pine Forest Drive which would be less of a nuisance to the 4esidents as well as .to tilE; office personnel of the State Highwi'lY Shop? . . Mr. Howard A. Mayo, Jr. March 17, 1970 12. What assurance do I have that trees will remain or that the ut.11103t will be done to ensure a neat appearance? If this zoning is approved and the intended plant is built here, can the residents of this area be assured the operation will come under strict regulations to abide by \~bat th",y say they will do: Can oUr interests be insured by provision of a conditional uSe permit? Y2L::;jP~ Charles W. Fisher :?ll~.f2s~ ~ .,. .. 107-1.\ Pine l'"rest Driva eoloni&llieights (Chastsrfield CQun~y) Vi,..~illia 2}8J4 Mr. l!.o_rd A. l1ayo, Jr., Se<:retary Chesterfield County Planning Commisei'm. Cheet"rl"ield Courlhouse, Virginia 23832 -, Re: {'D-13C _ FezonillR -:rec;u-est of J, J. Mitchell of property 011 Pine Forest Drive Dear Mr. Hay,,: Thi~ is io- advise_ that J a'" n>j""M~ j", rezoning of th!> abeve properly t" InduEtria.l (M) M requested by Mr. J. J. Mitchell for tM following "(',>;3sons: 1. Pine Forest..D:rivil is adaildllndst"N..t ending at the Virgil1ia State flighwayDepartment; therefore, r feeJ-th"-t PiM F(},....st Drive cannot a""ommodateanotherco"",,"l"cialest,,blislment. 2. Residenc'!~ on both sid,," of Pin" Forost Drive w.;,uld be g:reatly arhetoobyan'indushyinth..are<\. 3. exN-rPin P""Slmt. nezoniTlf\ of the propel'ty,.,ould give>th" developet the right to anydhection he eh,","s"s re~ardless of ,mlit h" might "-t,ipuht,,, at Mo'''' ", c.ould If this jl1'opert~. is a11ow<0 like...iseblloo",,, industrial. to be rezonedoth.er pl'Jpal'tyinthe .5, Aplantintbisareat-JOuldfW""tlyreducethevalueofUJYl'roperty for the following reasons. a.ltwoulcibslocatedaorossthestreetfromroyhouse. b. H,' ohildren hav" to walk to !fllrighway to catch th", scho"l bus by way of Pine F,"rest Drive. Wtth the ioe""""" of t"arHc by)O(Y,t the:i.r safety ""ulcl l:avery much in danger. c. ThodrainagefromfjlHigh.;ayand'.>/altha11Roadnry.,,,,-ns through <fey fNmt yard, no''''.ing wtt.h a wrmal.,..aJn. Wtth addiE,,,,<<l industrial plant and proposed streotthis drain<<!!:e ~ould be gre<<tly increased. d. Th<lnois"ofpr"s"ine~punchingllla"hine",plusthe illcreasedshiftlngcftrainS1:Ol.\ldcreate()bj"ctio""l!l<>ise, I have my life sIlvings in my home and. ha',e spent com;iderable time and ll10ney tr:> improve it and this pl"'nt wonld dec,.."ase the value "t "- time ,men properly is increasing, m"king it irnpracticalt.o sell. Ifslllthataral;Ontn. of this property and an Jnd=try in tho aroa would cost me ""''lVenl thousand ~ oolhrs, Very truly yours, ~ C.&7/' ~ifri~/?~ . liowm:dA lJayo Jl' County Plalmel' Chesterfield Courthouse Chesterfield, Virginia . '7rrJ c. - J March 1970 Dear Sir: aeterenceyourletterconcerningtherezoningrequt.stbyJ.J.J;\itchel1 cas~ number 70-1JC. Based on the ve:ry limited infom.atiorl axailable to "1e concerning this request and Until:! havs satisf3.CtoI'y answers to the following questions, r bave.no alternative but to object to this rezoning. -- -l.1'ihat exact type "f industr,1willbe placed on the property? 2. Will the type power used in the JUa;;uf:mtllring process of this indlls~ry create noise. pollution. or emit gaseous 01' offensive oders1 3. Will there be shift work involved? , 4. With Pine For~st Drive to be used as the main ""trance to &ld. frop the plant, will the gtnet reqlli:re 'I'l'ideing?'i1hat if t1'll.ckg use the II8.lllB entrance" 5.Hon-muchtraff'iccanbeeXl'",ctedonthisstrtletatsl'>,.ii'tehangir.g til''''? 6."""""ffectwillthisrs",minghaveonth""alneofm:rproperty? 7. Will this :t'e"onil1g effect llIY ,,""""'s1 If' so, in what way? Yours1':r'u~ 4au4/ d~ . . Pim,fcr"st Dri.',,, Coloni1tl H"igbt~ (Chest<n'field County) Vii'!!inia 23834- Mr. HOWerd A. !J"-yo,Jr".SlOq',,tary Che~ter~i~ld Ccurrty P1runhin~ Commissien' Chest..rfieldCcurthouse,Vil'ginia 2J8}2 Re' ?O-ljC':' flezonil1l'; l'enu"i;t , 0' J. J, Mitc""U__of' piop",,-ty "l'l Pin..fOl'ast Dri"" DaarNr,lful.;n: X 9,PP<>so l'..~o"i~'of th.. above property fl'oroAgriculti..l1""l to rnd\1~tl'i;;l (M) fo!' tne "fonowing reasonS; 1. I do "'ot f""l that ",n industry ~st"b1i1hm"mt should be placed in ~ re$identi~l ~re~. 2. Pine forest Drive i~ a dea6 !,nrl street and th",'eforo a v""y quiet stl'eetat pr"ssnt. ). A "lant in this are" ""vld ""due" the v~h" of my property, I have Ii"'''' in this """" for several year5 and have put ,;,o1>s:iderable tin.. and money into A home ,mieh loan enjoy. 4. The incraMed noise of <>'1> industry",wllld b" ""ry objectionable. .5. The traffic on Pi"" For.est Dl'iw, ."ould increas<'J by }OO%. V"q trulY.Y<:lurs, ~ . ff ~ ;to //~ - .4~<-<'~ 'dj}-&--cY-<~' ,/errmrdJ.GOO arY ./~/ ~/F6/3 I , ~ I I t ~ I I ~, I ~, I ~ iF- 11 I it I t i~ : :~ I ~ I ~ Ie;- ~ !~' ~ {. I <>" ~ i\ *-.~ r,,~ '(J .~~ , ~ . ~. . ~ ' t~ . . "O,,18fll~ C\i J~A 1970 '~" ,,Il!J:CEIVCD c': I wmrulJf.""." =1 \ '?J f.j/fS1tfffil"lJ(lfm:/!JRS ~ ,~,~~:qy)~~",/ ''!(~!'!!'\GV'~- .LC-~~7--/C/uv--~~---~~~- ~O~CL..y::L-.0.---~/~~L~L<=v_p""'~ rr , -~2.~~~-"'-r"",-~.~..,/~-,,,~ -~!..,~~-?----~---- --~----~-- -~-~-~~rtbTo<v,~~;t ,.,..~~;tr'd .2*_~~. ~_~~~L~~ __., _~I.d.L,.~~_____ ____.__.__ -- -- . 7~~<.<V_Z:C'udy__; ____;?lj.-v/;;;:?~~ (J d:~-~0 . . U _--72~/ ~~~ . - Appomattox4lasin Indnstrial Developme'Corporation MON~ O' BUlln, NO lH MON~ol H~'" '>'_3071 P. O. BOX 707 PETERSBURG. VA. 23803 AprJ:l 7, ).97Q TO: CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS FROM, The App<>matt"x Bastn Industrial Development Corporation BY, W. H. Caldwell The Appomattox Basin Industr;al Development Corpo~atio~ through its program has heen instrumental in tnteresting "- man- ufacturing company in locating a plant in ChesteT:field County on prope~ty owned by Mr, J. J. Mitchell. Application has l>"cn ma(le by Mr. M;:toh"ll fo>, ""zoning th1s site f.."", agriculture to "'''nufacturing. Mr. Mitohell has re- quested that ABIDeO represent him at this hearing. The company, thnt has taken an option on Mr. Mitchell's land and is planning-to lo",atea "'anufact"ring facilityther", is a substantial company with other plants and this is an e~pansion of their program. The plant proposed to be located herc will fab- ricate small and medium s~ze rneta~ components. The operation w~ll not create any odor or amoke that could be objectionable to the aurround;.ng area. The operatinn will have some metal working equip- ment "hich will make a ce,.taJ;n amount of noise but not unduly loud. In order to eliminat€ as much of thJ;s noise as p05siole, the company pian" to leave a buff",. strip of forest around the plant an1 any nois" oreated by the plant should not be hear1 beyond this boundry. It is the;r plan to operate one 8 hour sh;ft each day and, as Ier as they kno~' nOl\l, there will not be any extra st.i fts or night operations. The empioyment ~n the plant will be in the neighbor- hood of 100 at the beginning, as soon as ~t oan be built up to that amount, and eventually tbrough eKpansion may reach as much as 300. The necessary arrangements will he ma1e to dispose of any sewage waste that ayC present and, wea,'e told that, therei5no industrial waste from the operation. It is our hope that you will give fevoraele consideration to this so that we can add another manufacturing plant to the growing list in Chesterfield County. \'/HC/mlh Respeetfu~, I? ti ~ 17/'/ n~~ W~rialdwell. r:"e()utiv,;, Director