01-22-1992 Packet
./""
./"/
~~.
~
CHESTERFI ELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVl SORS
AGENDA
".. "
MEETING DATE: January 22 1992
ITEM NUMBER:
2 .
SUBJECT:
Recognition of the Chesterfield County Employee-of-the-Year
for 1991.
COUNTY ADMIN IS TRATORt 5 COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
Each year departments are requested to nominate one candidate
to represent their department for the Employee-of-the-Year Award, a
program initiated by former County Administrator Melvin Burnette.
Departmental nominations were submitted to the Employee-of-the-Year
Selection committee (Frederick W. Willis, Jr. and Bob Huebner, both
of the Department of Human Resource Management; Pauline Mitchell,
Director of ~~ws_ and Public Information; and Sandy Krumpe, Vice-
President of the Employees. Association). The committee selected
the one candidate whose performance and individual contribution to
the mission of the department and service within the community set
him or her above his or her fellow employees. A listing of the
sixteen employees nominated" is attached.
;
All candidates will be at the Board meeting to be recognized
for their accomplishments. The Employee-of-the-Year will be
announced at that time.
.r
PREPARED BY~ ~~
Frederick W. Willis, Jr.,
Director.
Human Resource Management
ATTACHMENTS: YES ~
NO 0
SIGNAT URE :
c#x
COUNTY ADM I NI STRATOR
00 001
\
~ ';S.9891
\~
e
e
Chesterfield County
Employee of the Year Award
1991 Nominees
Ann T. Smith, Building Inspection
David Phillips, General Services
Wanda Jenkins, Parks and Recreation
Deborah stone, Budget and Management
Shari Rumble, Accounting
Barry Arnold, Sheriff
William Wright, utilities
Janice Rasnake, Real Estate Assessor
Jean Joyner, Treasurer
Joyce Bellamy, Nursing Home
Michelle Harris, Library
Jo Carol Mayton, Purchasing
Diane Price, MH/MR
A. Marie Smith, Police
Perry Hornbarger, Fire
Karen Thompson, License Inspection
00 002
~
"'lo
t; ...
~<\. "
J~ II ·
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AG E NOA
..... ..". ~...
;\
MEETING DATE: January 22, 1992
ITEM NUMBER:
3.A.
SUBJECI:
Request Planning Cormnission to Recommend Appropriate
Watershed Studies
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
~rJ>>CUl
-d arI-~r8. ~4-
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
BACKGROUND:
Members of the Board of Supervisors have requested a review of
water quality standards and strategies for the Swift Creek, Lake
Chesdin, and Falling Creek watershed.
Chesterfield County has adopted cQuntyv.lide water quality
requirements .as a result of the Virginia Chesapeake Bay
Preservation "Act. In addition, stricter standards have been
adopted for the upper Swift Creek watershed.
The development of strategies to preserve 'and improve the water
quality of lakes and reservoirs often involve complicated
technical analysis. The correct technical studies required
depend upon the physi-cal condi tions of the water body and the
community objectives for its long term use.
PREPARED BY~
Thomas E. Jac on
Director of Planning
ATTACHMENTS: YES B
NO D
SIGNAT URE :
C~IN1STRATOR
. . ~~ ~ ~ i_
00 003
2JAN2292/A:AGENDAZ/gok
008-9891
*.~
.:...1.
e
e
AGENDA ITEM
REQUEST PLANNING COMMISSION TO
RECOMMEND APPROPRIATE WATERSHED STUDIES
JANUARY 22, 1992
PAGE 2
technical analysis. The correct technical studies required
depend upon the physical conditions of the water body and the
community objectives for its long term use.
The following section provides a brief description of relevant
physical factors of each water body and its watershed.
1. Swift Creek Reservoir
o Watershed is primarily forested, however includes
residential communities of Brandermill, Woodlake,
Deer Run and others
o Significant development planned in watershed
o Major County drinking water supply
o "The existing water quali ty wi thin Swift Creek
Reservoir appears satisfactory for water supply
uses. Because improving wa ter quali ty in this
water supply is not a practical goal, a pr irnary
goal of maintaining future water quality in Swift
Creek Reservoir at or near existing levels appears
to be reasonable." (CampI Dresser & McKee, Feb.
1990)
o
Chlorophyll a *
average
13.6 ug/l growing season
2. Lake Chesdin
o Large watershed - Chesterfield County only a small
portion of basin. See attached map.
o Modest development occurring within watershed
although significant long range. development in
Chesterfield County anticipated_ Forest land
(71.6%) and agricultural land (22.7%) primary
watershed land uses.
* A common pigment found in all 'types of algae. It is a common
indicator of nutrient enrichment and lake water quality.
2JAN2292/A:AGENDAZ/gok
00 004
.~~
e
e
AGENDA ITEM
REQUEST PLANNING COMMISSION TO
RECOMMEND APPROPRIATE WATERSHED STUDIES
JANUARY 22, 1992
PAGE 3
o Major County drinking water supply.
o Lake Chesdin contains a high levels of nutrients
and algae. Agricultural runoff is prime source of
nutrient enrichment (60%). (F.X. Browne and
Associates, April, 1991)
0 Chlorophyll a 18 ug/l stUdy per i.cd mean
(1990).
3. Falling Creek Reservoir
0 Watershed located in northeastern Chesterfield
County and is over 80% developed.
o " . . .. persistent water quali ty problems exist in
Falling Creek Reservoir and that a continued
decline in water quality can be anticipated.
These problems originate, in part, from the
physical character and setting of the reservoir,
and also from the effects of extensive development
throughout the watershed. Current development
trends within the Falling Creek Reservoir
watershed are likely to add to water quality
problems unless stringent storm-water management
is mandated for new development; however, the
impact on the reservoir from existing development
is probably greater, and will be much more
difficult to address. (Virginia Council on the
Environment, June, 1990)
o Former County drinking water supply
o
Chlorophyll a
20 ug/l average (1989)
The Planning commission could assist the Board of Supervisors by
assessing:
1. current physical, chemical and biological data on these
water bodies,
2. existing and planned watershed development ,
3. community objectives,
4. other relevant factors.
They could recommend necessary studies~ staffingl and resources
needed to develop water quality strategies for each watershed.
2JAN2292/A:AGENDA2/gok
00 005"
\&.
e
e
AGENDA ITEM
REQUEST PLANNING COMMISSION TO
RECOMMEND APPROPRIATE WATERSHED STUDIES
JANUARY 22, 1992
PAGE 4
Staff assistance for the assessment would be provided by the
Utilities and Planning Departments and the County's Environmental
Coordinator.
The Planning Commission should prepare a written assessment and
recommendation for consideration by the Board of Supervisors.
RECOMMENDATION:
The Board of Supervisors should request the Planning Commission
to identify needed information, studies, and resources required
in order to develop three reservoir water quality strategies -
one each for Swift Creek Reservoir, Lake Chesdin, and Falling
Creek Reservoir.
2JAN2292/A:AGENDAZ/gok
00. \006
o
~J-
LaJZ
li:1JJ
O:~a::
wZI.&J
1-0::1-
(l)Wz
LaJ>w
~ou
oC!)
o
%
o
::E
:z:
(.)
.a::
>-
l-
%
::J.
o
U
o
(,)
a::
z
"'"'
:c
"
1-~~
<Ii- ...
~~o'"
0"
'-...,
,
l............
-)
I
/
/
I
t ""
l_..J~~~
(,0
H , 'I
>-
J-
Z
=:J
o
U
C/')IJJ
~2
ulL.
-l1.
Q:o
1-1-
I-U'J
UJo
LLQ..
Ou
IJJ-
C!JD:
<0
-It;
-1-
-:c
>
C
-l
L.LJ
i:i:
a:
w
t-
en
W
~
U
~
-..
o
Q
~
~
"
Q
~-
r.LJ~ ;.
\.!:7-t
-T'
n.n
()D?
. .,
... f,'-.
OJ
~~
::-:
en
-t
o
Z
ITI
i
:0'
%
01"1
ecn
c:-I
ZITI
-1:0
-<:!!
",
r-
c
00 rttJB
i. -!,~.''''- .3-
r,
Iii. II
805-9891
j.g~
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
MEETING DATE: January 22, 1992
ITEM NUMBER:
3.B.
SUBJECT:
Streetlight Installation Cost Approvals
COUNTY ADMINISTRATORI S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
The Chesterfield County Streetlight Policy was revised by the
Board of Supervisors on August 22, 1988.
Streetlight requests from individual citizens or civic gLOUPS are
received in the Department of Environmental Engineering. Staff
examines each request and presents them at the next available
regular meeting of the Board of Supervisors for consideration.
Staff provides the Board with an evaluation of each request
relative to' the three evaluation criteria set forth in the
Policy:
1. Streetlights should be located at intersections;
2. There should be a.minimum average of 600 vehicles per
day (VPD) passing the requested location if it is an
intersection, or 400 VPD if the requested location 1s
not an intersection;
.J
CONTINUED NEXT PAGE
ATTACHMENTS: YES J(
~E~EOBY; ~~~~~~
Richard M.~Elf1Sh, P.E.
Director
Environmental Engineering
NO 0
/.
~
SIGNATURE:
COU~INISTRATOR .
,~oo .009
f
'"
e
e
Streetlight Cost Approvals
January 22, 1991
Page 2
3. Petitions are required and should include 75% of
residents within 200 feet of the requested location and
if at an intersection, a majority of those Les1dents
immediately adjacent to the intrersect 1on.
If a location is apPLoved by the Board, an installation cost
quotation for the 1nstallation 1s requested from Virgin1a Power.
Once a quotation has been received, it is forwarded to the Board
for the1L next scheduled meeting. Cost quotations from Virginia
Power are valid, in general, for a period of 90 days. The Board,
upon presentation of the cost quotation may then approve, defer,
or deny the expenditure of funds for the streetlight installa-
tion.
BERMUDA DISTRICT:
Location apPLoved at the November 13, 1991, meeting:
15910. GaLY Avenue
Cos.t 'to 1nstall st reet light: 9770.00
Does not meet minimum criteria for intersection or
vehicles per day~
CLOVER HILL DISTRICT:
Location approved at the October 9, 1991, meeting:
InteLsect10n of Tall Hickory Court and Tall Hickory Drive
Cost to install streetlight: 92,485.00
- Meets minimum criteria.
The Department of Environmental Engineering has received
written notice of oppos1t1on.(copy attached) to this
installation from one homeowner residing at the intersec-
tion.
00 010
c~;
~
e
e
Board of Supervisors Agenda Item
Subject: Streetlight Installation Cost Approvals
Date: January 22, 1992
Page 3
BUDGET AND MANAGEMENT COMMENTS
The current balance in the Bermuda District Street Light Account is $11,050. The
cost of installing the street light requested is $770, upon which the balance remaining
would be $10,280. The current balance in the Clover Hill District Street Light
Account is $11,421. The cost of installing the street light requested is $2,485, upon
which the remaining balance would be $8,936.
es . L. Stegmaier, Director
udget and Management
00 011
B0126_wpl/Bos #4
e1hRGINIA POWER
-
Schede Completion Date Let~
Fa t. ~/1..2./Ci z M~
CNR 48
(Cu 5tO mer's Ad dress)
[tv,:;! Co - ~. A. L~q~~L
p 0 ~OX ~(J
C ~ '7 telL fit tel, 0 Z,3&3~
Date
(
/3 112-
,
Dear Custom er:
Thank you for your request for electric service at
/5 ;1 0
(, 4 '/-v-(
5 IY-e 12- l-
f .~~ JA-t-
The necessary engineering and construction work is being scheduled to provide for connection of your service by
(This scheduled compietion date may vary sHghtly in the event of bad weather).
/ 3 (
I n order for us to be able to prov,de service by the above scheduled com pteHon date. it will be necessary that you complete the items checked
betow by
'/1->
o InstaJI eye bolt.
o Instalt meter base and custome(s conductors.
o 0 bta i n elect rica~ ins pechon.
o Site graded to within 6" of final grade.
D Sign underground agreement and return to Virgjnia Power.
Q-B,ght of Way Easement. ~v-~~ c'*,,5Ic~
~her:
r~1177o
If your schedule will permit completion of these items before the required date. please contact me by calling 7 5 I - l{ () .3 1 .
extension . If your schedule wW not permit comp~etion of these ttems by the required datet the connection of your service will be
rescheduled. This eQuid mean a substantia~ delay in the final compietion date at this work.
Should there be any questions. or if , can be of any assistance1 pJease caJJ me~
Sin7i1 r1W) ~ {l;l~
Se rvice Re presenta t ive
r'\ .'\
r- .'
L--l
j
Please refer to Project Number utI/I 0 0 5 LI ~
when contacting Vjrgin,a Power about your service.
o O~ 012
Distribution: White - Customer: Canary - File
.
.
...
.
VlRDlllIA PDf/IEIIIIWJRTII CARDUMA POWER
Vicinity Map
Map No. J.. (;1 t1 q
_~~~~.-D -~~ ! '~~~~:~~~~~~1~ _ ~'.~~_-:~~~~i~;:~~~~:~~-~~~~~_:~- ~~-~-:_~~~~~~-:_--~ ---=::~~~~~.~~~=:~~~-_~~~_~ ~-_..-
- ~ - t.. ~ 10- . ~---=-IL(J "1 L Vlif] 4"-"-.-" ..-- --~------:-~--~-- _nn__~ ~- ----.. -.. I>- . . '-...---- -=--
- '-~-...: -X~~.-.~.- :--~._-=~~~~.--~~~J~~~il~-:~t~:: - ~-~~-. ~~~::~~~.-~~~~~:~--~ ~' is-'
- ~
p j~~~6~e~Q5:t:__n~~~_.:~.~-=-==::-. ~ ~ ~-_.~--~--~----~- --'-._--==-~----J --
11...-.---.--..5-i.l)-- .... II - - 1-1IJ-\l---J.-t.tJ-P.P.~.~P-bE:k;-~--.- -_n-___ ._.._~---- · ----~
- n.___u.._. ------- -------..---~ (j"r---cra::.---r;,---7J:.--' : .---\ - ---- ~~------~- ~-n-~.~
-_~____.-----___ _<<..25 . _ ~ L~
----A:~--~--1"2
. .. --- t.A-
C
.-:.
t-
t-~_
!;i-1..J-~ ~=
-~:5'~__C; 7. . _~ ~
/ 7.3 _
77 (j .---
. I
l
Phone No..
~ ;l-
Easement No.
Sponsor
Address
ISCfto
G a "''-1 A-t~
0..
CARS Device No~
F7
Customer ~f,... ~ 5
Project No.. 0 7
Circuit No"
?3b
'i3~
Substation
Form No. 727345(Ac:x' SO)
.
; ~~ ~I)I) . t fid/( ;t/;iall 7ll171fJikC
. : tiel It. l! bit l}l. i 7 rp/Il in -13 1 r~;
t- ~
...
December 26, 1991
Richard Leonard
Administrative Anal yst Engineering
Chesterfield Cotu1ty
P. o. Box 40
Chesterfield, Virginia 23832
Dear Mr. Leonard:
Thank you for your letter of request regarding estimate number 05-110-663. We
have canpleted our estimate to install 1-8000HPSV at Tall Hicko:r:y Court.
The cost to the County for the installation of this light is $2, 485, described
as follows:
Total cost of job
$2,358
Less revenue credit
at 4: 1 ratio
$432
Cost to County
$1926 + TERF $559 = $2,485
This cost will be effective for ninety days from the date of this letter. If
\\e do not receive your authorization to proceed with this ~rk within the
ninety day I;>erioo we will cancel this project. Should you require this YJOrk
to be perfo~d at a later date, please make a new request and a new cost will
be sul:mi tted to you.
The necess~J engineering and construction vtork is being scheduled to provide
for connection of your service by March 10, 1992. (This connection date may
vary slightly in the event of bad weather.) In order for us to be able to
provide service by the aOOve cormection date, the i terns checked below must be
canpleted by February 19, 1992.
X letter of authorization returned to virginia Power
X ~xm~~ State Highway Pennits (~~ill be submitted once
we receive authorization)
Should there be any questions, or if I can be of any assistance, please do not
hesitate to call me at 379-4816.
C!r;~
R. e. ~ester
Senrice Representative
cc: Mr. H. C. Stickley
00 014
.
.
1- . ".,..
!Ken/9?gEnn. 9.fyricX:.
13001 'Tal[ J{id;pry Ct
~ 'V'fll23112
.
: dt-?:)t:-- fY}f(, A~8
.
~ J.~~~r ~
:~11~ ~ ~ ctYJ
: 11-2-0-9 I, cP {)AI CLi ~
:~ ~ &rw;/,~61-~~
: h.~ ~ crdJ At.eJ ~~
:~~ ~ CJL~
~7 ~JkJ~~
4 ~. JY(pedc
~ ~ '-............ '-... ~ ,....f ~ #.__
/~/~'$ ~
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . .
00 'Ol~'5
3.C.
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVI SORS
AGENDA
MEET ING DATE:
January 22, 1992
ITEM NUMBER;
3.C.
SUBJECT:
Appropriation of Funds for Repairs to Cedar Springs Road
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
If the Board feels that this project should be done and since Matoaca 3~ funds
are depleted, the County.Administrator should be instructed to handle this within
his budget authority.
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
The Hoara 18 requested to appropriate $1,500 for the maintenance of
Cedar Springs Road.
BACKGROUND: Mr. Colbert has received a request from citizens to repair
Cedar Springs Road. Cedar Springs Road is a dirt road located within a
County right-of-way and is not a part of the Virginia Department of
Transportation's Secondary Road System. Approximately 16 families use
Cedar Springs Road for access. To repair the road, two (2) inches of
stone should be added at a cost of $1, 500 . These repairs will not
bring Cedar Springs Road up to state standards.
The County has no formal program for maintaining County owned
rights-af-way. When requests for maintenance are received from
citizens, the requests have been reviewed by the Board on a case
by case basis. If the condition of the road would hamper the
provlslon of emergency services, staff has recommended that the
County provide repairs with the funds for the repairs provided from the
magisterial district's 3e road fund, however, the Matoaca District
39 Road Fund currently has a $9 balance.
RECOMMENDATION: If the Board wishes to perform the Ce~ar Springs Road
repairs, $1,500 needs to be appropriated.
PREPARED BY~
~
ABO
ATTACHMENTS: YES fit
R.J. McCracken
Director of Transportation
NO []
SIGNATURE:
CO~N1STRATOR
00 01'6
BQS-9891
--l
- - - - - r = =1- - i ~
I
II.
a ~. ,
IILL..U
14
--------
4 ./
C/// \06
~ \(.0-
f')t
----------- ---
/---------------
...--
__ 6' 40
6&'\0
64')0
6
It\
. ___-------- 9
.l:.--------~- . \ B
I
I
,
]2 6156
~- ------------ '
----------
/
I
I I
I I
I
/'
00
N
, --------
_/~
. ------
~, ~ 11
12
---
---------
.--------
II
/'
./'
./'
-----......
--
15
~
I
.
I
~-
O~7
/'
/;/~/'
./ /~
rI'''
~;~::::~
f::::j LOCATION OF
jiiifi!i!!: :~g~s~~CEMENT
/'
18
6'00
Ii )u I
--/'~
J. D~ I~
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF'SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
MEET ING DATE: ~T~nl1r1 ry ??, , qQ 2
ITEM NUMBER:
3.D.l.
SUBJECT:
State Road Acceptance
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR. S COMMENTS:
Re.~d J)~
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
The Commonwealth Transportation Board requires all Boards of
Supervisors to request, by resolution, what roads are eligible
for inclusion into the State highway system. This process starts
with the submission of road and drainage plans to the Department
of Environmental Engineering and Virginia Department of
Transporta tion. Once the plans are approved for construction,
the subdivision is recorded. This allows building permits to be
issued by the Building Inspection Department.
After there are enough qualifying homes (VDOT requires three
occupied dwellings per street), the developer will request a
discrepancy list from VDOT I Environmental Engineering and the
Utili ties Department. The developer then completes the
discrepancies, if any, and obtains a letter from VDOT,
Environmental Engineering and Utilities stating the roads have
been completed per the approved plans. The subdivision section
is then placed on the Board Agenda for final approval_
The appropriate, information is then forwarded to VDOT, by
Environmental Engineering, and then the Commonwealth Transporta-
tion Board Formally assigns the Route numbers to the new streets.
ATTACHMENTS: YES Jt
NO C
PREPARED BY~
Richard M. P.E.
Director
Environmental Engineering
(continued on next page)
SIGNAT URE :
~
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
.~oo 018--'.
BOS-ga91
.
.
,.'" .-.
Board Agenda Item
Environmental Engineering
Page Two
Subject: State Road Acceptance
It is at that point that the VDOT officially takes over the
streets for maintenance of potholes, snow removal, maintenance of
culverts, roadside ditches, etc.
The following are those subdivisions that have been approved for
State acceptance by VDOT, Environmental Engineering and the
Utilities Department.
Bermuda:
Hamlin Estates
Dale:
Branch's Trace, Phase 3
00 Ot9:.
.
.
,;/ - ..
MEMORANDUM
TO: Board of Supervisors
FROM: Environmental Engineering
SUBJECT: State Road Acceptance - Hamlin Estates
MEETING DATE: January 22, 1992
Hamlin Terrace
Hamlin Circle
Hamlin Way
H~rvILI~ E!::i'-~'-E:!3
--
~
t)(
..
· t
~
\ i
~
~
."
..
00 .0-20
.. .....,~... . .
MEMORANDUM
TO: Board of Supervisors
FROM: Environmental Engineering
SUBJECT: state Road Acceptance - Branch" s Trace, Phase 3
MEETING DATE: January 22, 1992
Pine Orchard Drive
EJf=:l~Nc:I-tE:!3 .Ftt=\CE
~H~SE :3
------1'
~. _~.'- I
.~
POCOHONTAS
:STATE F';4;::?K
\
"
0-0 021,~
,.)
:5 t Dt :J t
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVl SORS
AGENDA
( ft
MEETING DATE:
January 22, 1992
ITEM NUMBER:
3.D.2.
SUBJECT;
Agreement for Maintenance of a Sto~ater Drainage System
and Best Management Practice Facility for Crown service
Station VA - 58.
COUNTY ADMIN IS TRATOR1 S COMMENTS~
R~ A~ovo-f
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
Stormwater runoff from developing area's poses two coricerns.
First, development tends to change the hydrologic characteristics
of a given watershed, affecting the volume and runoff rate which,
if not managed, can cause considerable downstream damage.
Second, evidence indicates that this runoff may be more harmful,
from a pollution standpoint, to state waters than sewage or
industrial discharges. Stormwater management facilities combined
with Best Management Practices (BMP's) are utilized to lessen the
water quality. and quantity impact caused by stormwater runoff.
Best Management Practices. refer to those controls that have been
proven in the past to be effective and may include structural
( pond and lake s ) and non - s truct ur al f ac i 1 i ties such as
maintenance operations and procedures, management techniques and
reduction of paved surfaces.
Stormwater management facilities (structural BMP's) are commonly
used to attenuate the peak runoff rate of stormwater and provide
(Continued)
ATTACHMENTS: YES ft
NO 0
PREPARED BY; f~./I)~~/
RiChard~. McElfish, P.E.
Director
Environmental Engineering
SIGNATURE:
~
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
00 022
BOS-9891
e
e
Board Agenda Item
Environmental Engineering
Page 2
SUBJECT: Agreement for Maintenance of a Sto~ater Drainage
System and Best Management Practice Facility for Crown
Service Station VA - 58.
for precipitation of suspended particles or sediment. This is
accomplished through the use of three general types of
facilities, detention, retention, or infiltration.
1. A detention facility detains stormwater for a given
period of time in order to release it at a rate that
will not exceed any downstream capacities or otherwise
cause erosion. These facilities are normally dry
except during rain events and shortly thereafter.
2.
A retention facility serves the same
detention facility except that there
pooling of water (lake or pond).
purpose as a
is a permanent
3. An infiltration facility allows allows stormwater to
soak into the ground and, thus, requires specif ic sandy
soil types that are normally only found in the eastern
portions of the County.
The County's involvement in stormwater management is driven
by a variety of forces, among which are: state erosion,
sediment control requirements and the Chesapeake Bay
Preservation Act (CBPA), the EPA National Pollutant
Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) mandates, Flood Plain
Management Ordinance and Upper Swift Creek Ordinance.
Ultimately, the purpose of this involvement is to prevent
loss of life or property and deterioration of water quality
within, around, and downstream of development.
A large majority of all ponds and lakes constructed in both
commercial and residential settings over the last fifteen
( 14+) year.s -.are . designed ..for ~ ei ther water.... , quanti ty and/ or
quality control. We currently have seventy-three (73)
approved and constructed structural Best Management
Facilities.
The Board of Supervisors is requested to allow staff to proceed
wi th the execution of a Stormwater Management System and Best
Management Practice Facili ties Maintenance and Indemnif ica tion
Agreement with Crown Central Petroleum Corporation. In a form
approved by the County Attorney.
Due to the limited available capacity of the downstream drainage
facilities and cost associated with upgrading those facilities,
00 .0-23
e
e
Board Agenda Item
, Environmental Engineering
Page 3
SUBJECT: Agreement for Maintenance of a StoLmWater Drainage
System and Best Management Practice Facility for Crown
Service Station VA - 58.
the developer opted to detain water onsite. A detention basin
was designed by a professional engineer to accommodate the storm-
water runoff which was approved by the County.
The Maintenance Agreement consists primarily of a final
inspection report, preventive maintenance inspections ever three
(3) years and indemnification agreement for the County. The
responsibili ty for the integri ty of the basin falls wi th the
developer of the property and any subsequent owners. The
County's only involvement is the assurance that the maintenance
agreement is being followed by the owner.
The agreement has been approved as to form by the County Attor-
ney's Office and has been executed by the developer.
DISTRICT: Bermuda
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors authorize the
County Administrator to execute the maintenance agreement with
the developer as approved by the County Attorney's Office.
00 024
e
e
AGREEMENT FOR MAINTENANCE OF
STORM WATER DRAINAGE SYSTEM
AND BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICE
FACILITY
THIS AGREEMENT, dated as of the 18th of December, 1991, by
and between CROWN CENTRAL PETROLEUM CORP., a MARYLAND corporation
(the Corpor a tion), and the COUNTY' OF CHESTERFIELD, VIRGINIA, a
political subdivision of the Commonwealth of Virginia (the
County), recites and provides as follows.
RECITALS
CROWN' CENTRAL PETROLEUM CORP., a MARYLAND Corporation, is
the owner of certain real estate shown as Tax Map No. 116-7(1)3,
situated in Bermuda District, Chesterfield County, Virginia,
known as CROWN SERVICE STATION VA-58 which is to be developed as
a commercial site.
The CORPORATION owns a storm water drainage system
consisting of a DETENTION FACILITY as shown and described on the
plans entitled, "CROWN SERVICE STATION VA-58", dated December 18,
1991, or as shawn on all subsequent revisions therefore, made by
POTrS, MINTER AND ASSOCIATES, PC, a plat of which is attached
hereto as Exhibit A.
To comply wi th the rules and regulations of the County
pertaining to CROWN SERVICE STATION VA-58, the CORPORATION has
agreed to maintain the DETENTION FACILITY (herein referred to as
the "FACILITYU) in accordance wi th the terms and condi tions
hereinafter set forth.
MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT
NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the mutual
covenants and undertaking of the parties, the parties hereby
00 02.-5
....
e
e
(b) The inspec~ion repor~s shall be submitted in writing to
the County wit:hin 30 days af-:er each inspect.ion; the report.s
shall include the following:
(1) The date of ins?ection;
(2) Name of inspec~or;
(3) The condition of:
( i ) 'I egeta tion ,
(ii) Fences,
(iii) spillways,
(iv) 2mba~~en~s,
(v) Reservoir area,
(vi) Inlet an~ outlet channels,
(vi~) Underground drainage structures,
(vii~) Se~~ent load,
\x~) Gates an~ Valves or,
(xl Any other item that could affect the
proper f\l..~ction of the "FACILITYII.
(4) Desc=iption of needed maintenance;
( c 1 The CORPORATION agrees to perform promptly all
needed maintenance repor~ed by the Inspec~or.
4: . RI GETS OF THE COUNTY IN THE EVENTS OF DEFAULT BY THE
CORPO~T;rON
In the event of any default or failure by the
in the performance of any of the covenants and warranties
pertaining to the maintenance of the "FACILITY", in accordance
wi th the terms and conditions thereof which continues for a
period of thirty {30l days after notice in writing thereof given
to the CORPORATION as provided by the County t the county
shall have the right at its option, to enter upon the prop~rties
owned by the CORPORATION referred to above and, for the
account of the CORPORATION maintain and" repair the
facility, as provided herei~, and all costs thereof shall
constitute a lien upon the properties owned by the
CORPORATION Nothing herein shall obligate the County to
CORPORATION.
maintain the tlFACILITY".
3
.00 026
"\.,
e
e
agree as =~l:ows:
1 . l'!AI~IT~~~.NC::: OF '!':-:E ftF:;C:::~!"
r:'~e
CORPORATION
agrees
~hat
~ -
...;..-
shall
main.~a.in.
.-
indetini tely t.1.e 11 FAC::'I':"'I" in a manner fJl/hicb. will pe=mi t tne
.. FAC! LI~tI ~:J per:: orrn t~e pu=~os as = or whici i ~ was des ignec. a..TlC.
c~ns~=~c~;c, and i~ ac=~rdance w~~~ ~he s~andards by which ~t was
designe~ an~ cons~=~=~ec, al: as shown anc desc=~=e~ on ~he pl~~.
Spec~=ical:y, ~he
CORPORATION
agrees tha~ i~ shall:
( i ) re!:'lo....,e s.:..l to anc. O"C~"'l2!"" cie~= is =rom t~e u FAC::':~!" so a.s
to ma..:.n ~a.in
t.he
e l;~la 't:.on
.--
-..,.,-
-:.ie b01:~orn at
tie
":~c:~:~!tI
as
shown an t~e approved plans.
(iiJ plan~ and mow grass or m~t=;n a vege~a~~?e cover an
the slopes s-...:.rr::n.:~.~c.i:lg ~j,e fI:AC:~:~fI and
( i.:.:. ) main::.a.in in good. orde.1:" and repai= ~e ;r:..::.c.:.pal and
emergency spillways which se~~e as the ou~=low devices,
for
....
\-.:le
nFAC:I.:~".
2 . =!1trlL :NS?EC':'ICN RE?OR':S
The
CORPORATION agrees
~ha tit. will he. ve t~e
tha~, u~on comple~~on of
the
Co 'U...."1 ~ 7
30
design engineer c2r~.:E7
CAys of c=m'Plet~.~n bat
in
'tFAC:L:::T'Y" ,
wr:. t:":lg to
~~e
1'~:-; .- ~ .; ...,.
... - ----
....
~.:le
tlFAC:LI~" .:.s cons-::~...lc-:'ed in ac::~rc.ance - wi ~h 'C:te a~rovec. plans
and speci=~=ations.
3.. !NSPEC':':ON FOR PP..E"lENTA~ MAINTENANCE
{ a} The CORPORATION agrees to cause inspec-:ions to
be made of the ItFAC!LITY" by a Professional Engineer reqis-::ered
in Virginia retained by the CORPORATION at its expense, and
approved by the County. The inspection shall occur during the
last 60 days of the first: year of operation and at least once
ever). 3 years t~ereaf~er.
2
.00 0,27
e e
.....
- ..
I~-iDE!ll~:=: C;.~':: ':N C F CCTn'in::"!
TZ1e
CORPORATION
hereby agrees
t:J.a~
shall
save,
hold ha.=:nless,
-...--"':
~....-
i:lc.emn.i=7
.....
,-ne
Co U-'1 -=::-. = :: ,~rn an c..
aga':':lS~
.... 1 ,
~--
liabilit.y, losses, clai..'!ls, de:nanc.'s, cos-::s and. ex;e:lses ar:..si:lt;
from, or out af, and Qe=aul~ or fa~luze by ~~e
CORPORATION
to
maint.ain
.....
~:le
"~""~-T-""""U
.. .""'\ '-- -....... - -
i:l
ac:::~rd.a.nce
.. .. ~ ......
w....;.. _..
t~e
~er:ns
2-"1 Co
condi~~cns se~ ===~~ herei~ or by aC~3 of ~~e CORPORATION
.. -
ar:.s~ng !:==m,
or ~u~ ai,
.t-~Q
"-..- -
c~ns~~~c~~an, ope=a~~an,
r01"""'i-';-
_:-c._-
or
rnai:lt:.ena!lce of -:.=:e II=AC:L:~".
6 .
':~e ;a=~es
..... c:: - =:a ~ ~
...__ _ 'WfIttJ
e.x;::-essly do
~~~ ~n~;~~ =y exec~~on
--
-...I -
t;us ~g=e~rnenx. to ==eat:e in ~"le p~lic or allY ;rle!!'..ber tjereof, any
. ..
r:..g=."Cs as
. ." .
a -:..::..:...= :: ~ a..=-:.y
be~e==-c.:.==::
""'-
-...
=- t:::'=:':: = .:...:. ad. an yo ner !l 0 't a.
par~7 hereof to ma~:l~ain a sui~ for any da~a;es ;~su~~~ to ~e
te~s or provisions of t~s rtgreeme~t.
7. T~e foregoing ag=ee~en~s shall be c~venan~s which ~~ wi~h
~~e land an~ shall ~=u=e to ~he bene=~t of anc shall be =~~g
upon t~e par~~es hereto, ~~ei= reS?ec~~ve suc:essors an~ assigns,
and all subsequent owne=s of the proper~y.
B. Upon execu.~icn of this .Zl.gre""'ment, it shall be recorded ~
the Clerk's Of=i=e
of t~e
f""':; _ -. ~ .: ....
'- _.i. -.-...:., -.
Co~ of C~es~2==ield CO~~7,
Virginia, at the
CORPORATION
e~e.:lse..
IN WI '!NES S wr..L~OF , the C:lr;orat~an has caused this
Agreement to be s~gne~ in its names by a duly au~~or~zeci officer.
;.fJ;
.!-i ... ""'t'T.o,..' J
:~_; r '.:J{~a(s ~o ~~~;1 e.. J~
c, ,0' {N(...1~ I -
k .... . vi'"
cE16tant Cou~t'v~ ~..;.t
v ,oC'".l..~ 0 rn l
CROWN ~T~ PETROLEUM CORPO~TION
By: I~- (UA..~f/~ '-I ~
,
Ti tIe R. D. MCMULLEN, VICE PRES IDENT
CoUNTY OF CEES~~.:--<-~~;o, VIRGINIA
By:
Lane Ra.msey
County Adminis~=ator
4
00 028
{.
J
"-
1
It
It
Approved as ~~ f~r~:
Coun-=7 At.-:.or:ley
C:-'-''''~
_J..rL_....
MARYLAND
CITY
OF
OF BALTIMORE to-w:.:. :
/; / {;^ ) t ^ v
(. :'. .< ~ /P ,1_ _ "_ . I t.. J'l..-L. f-
~... . c.... ~
a ~ 1 0 ~ a=-.:'J' ~''':= :...:. =
.. 'oil'!
a...'1 Co
::,::r
:.~e
- I
CITY ane.
signee.
S t~ ~= af :;r;said, c.~ ~e!"e=::~ cer-:~=~~ ~:~.:.a:: R. D. MCmILLEN
whosa :lame a~I.~==S:"cie!l~ 0::: CROWN CENTRAL PETROLEUM CORPORATH
~~ t.~e : ==e;-=i.:lg a.::.=. ~_~exec. .~= .:.::.=.::.; ::e:=..=':'::'g cia -ce an
-=.:le
i (~.tf-
cay
~-
. ~ ,
,.... Ql"" ~ll. ",. '-~ ,
1--.
~ """ 0/
-~~I
~as a=~~=~l=~;e~ ~~e same
be! or e me irl my j ur :..sCi.c-=.ion a=:: r esaic...
Given ~~cie= ~y ~~~ ~~s
My C=mrnission e~i=es:
I~~da~. of
- ..
"7 ./ I / '-.i )
-/"'1 - /. '-
~<::: o.....-......~
, 0 ;~;
, --
/'
/ I: I-
I/ /~ _~~
---.....
<. < :Sd'.J-~...:{
"""'----
No~arI P~lic
STA~ OF V:~G:N!A
CO~!/C=TY OF CEES~~~:~~.n, t~-wit:
I
- ,
a notarz ?U=lic in and for t~e
County ~~d State aforesaid, do hereby cer~i=y ~hat Lane Ra~sey,
C~un~7 A~~i~~5~=a~=r, whose n~~e is signed t= -ie fore~cing and
annexed wr.:.. ~~:lg bear.:.ng da ~e on t.j.e day of
19_, has acknowledged t.~e sa.rne before me :.=. my ju..r.:.sCi.c-:ion
aforesaic..
Given ~~der my hand ~~is
My c~mm~ssion e~ires:
day of
, 0
I - ....
Nota.:-! Public
t "I
~...:..
00 0:29
'Y'" -,
''''\ ~.~
;' ..' ~
'..... ' . .... . ~
, l/"-i 5ITE I~
~ J( (~\I .~
) ,/\.a.
~
.
ai
C:.
~!
~,
04J1
~
~
{"l
\
~.,
-1\
Q\
~
~
" !']
\ r i
,...I
t~
;...
Ul ;~
5" :h
- I
/+-,
~
. .-0\
\~
')
. \ "
J ct:" I
"',
j
.-.......
e.i ~
~ ~j J
Hu ry ~ 'ar--J
---!?~~D ~ ~~ '=:1"
\-___, _ _ 0190 'l-, ~
~ - __ 't
-- ----1 ~ ~
. ~_ /Q ntJ)
--------:( .
/'
/
~t
DlI ;"
~V
~~
U1tJ
"'1~
~r~
. I ::
Ci~
...... .J
'-Ir-
E
'""'"'
J
-I
tx\
REV. No.1 DATE
~~
L.
'tb
\C'"
\~ T
'.,/\ ~
~~ \. ~
.-.-"' \ - \ Ilf
. ..-roo ~ \~r- \, f
A/ J e\ . ~L --(,,~;
...-.. -- '..t" . ~ ~ ~
.^'<~ ~ ....~ ~
, I ,~
~~
Jo
/
9-.~ ty
"tB
:> ,
, ~,/
,: ,,/ "-
X . \'\ \ "'"
'V \ I
/ \ \ j
\~
VICINITY SKETCH
I
/
J:j
. ....
\~
~
-.0
- -..,......," . ?~
~l-L- & - i
-- . -' -.........
CROWN CENTRAL PETROLEUM CORPORATION
.--..
PRODuCflit:. . g.ff=+;..jf R~ . -",^.a.Uf f E ~~ C' PE tlOU: UN PIIOOUCT S .. NC PE TRoe HE MIC Al ~
i OG)WN
G~"-'f""". DH leg . (>I'o.lf l'o.,Ion.... ( MA.RlE ~ . p c eo:t. T 168 . 8Al 'IMOlilf M"1l'l' L ""'0 21703
CROWN SERVICE STATION VA -58
STATE ROUTE 10 - HUNDRED ROAD
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY. VIRGINIA
SCAlf: f' = 2000' ~)A TE 12 -1'7 - 91
Sf A TID""'"
Nt) MaE;-
VA-58
~I~:~~ AS
I r - ~ ,- j( E .
I . ~ ~~ -
i PE.
iN'::
l D~ AWI~(,
I ~uMBf;'
on 030
.II
.
. ",
I .J!,......." r.....~ ~... ~ l...-.":";"'.t'": (,'''' ,;
F l O.J..,; .... I f1~ m rn I....U 07"; .....
; , ~. ,.~",,"
~ ~ ,... Ii. ....;;,... II! '."
! : ; :-.. P r- ..
....... '1'Y\ ,":11' ""'"
n.". r)P-1."" H '!'
. ,-;' - ? A .. .,.';.t ~ ~.lf.'" ~ ' ....
~ ... I _ ~ r .r ..
1'.)0 00".
/l eJJ- 4 ~ '(XJ"W - -
. . n - A~:--'-- ~-:.~ ~ ~.' ,~-. .:..:...-
.
~
. ,.-
2
'k,....
:';'.1
.... .
~t.
\~
"'"
Ei
'::J
L"
...,,)
\ ~l
c
t:
,1-
"~
r ,
. ...... --.,. III...
~ . ...fI . ;
. .
. ~ I'
t. )
t ......,,~~~.
..- ..........-
:.,....~ -. ",":r ~
It" .... ~::.~.~~ ~ c c. ."'_ ...~
) -.. '. ~. ' T"'P~ , t
-~ .
->
~ t \ i'.
, ~
'1 · -. ." t : i
~ t:
I .
1 ~... I
i .
~ ~u~-- --......
( ....::-- ,.,.: -,.-- ~ \
T"f' m g~n'
..,.. - .-.
" t r ~.... ~V'.
. ..... . .
. - · i
~ )
-, t
- L -.:'..
_ t
.. ~4;J
.~- ,-
'i" ~
a." ._____ t ... ..
~~.~ .. I
..: I ..
. .
--- .. .# ...~ . ........ I
~ j .. . I..... ,.. .~
.~~.~. ~::
: ..'",....
;., .,. ~ ,'" ,. h.:.,. 1 tit
-
l
.. :.,,-~...,
. I "".' .r I.. .. ..,' ,................
:f...........:"~.
ROUTE
10
HU NORED
RORO
CROWN CENTRAL PETROLEUM CORPORATION
~I
.)
PIOouCEIl:~' . II f Flf'ooIE Il'~ . M"'Rlnflil~ Ol pf TROt E UN' PIltQOU C T!l ....ND PfTROCHf"""'rC.....Ls
GENERAL OFFICE ~ . ~f NOIUM (HAILES,. "c &ox , \68 . 8Al TlMOD!: M,"'n...llo,j~ '] t103
RE\.... NO !
CROWN SERVICE STATION VA -58
STATE ROUTE 10 - HUNDRED ROAD
CHESTERFIE LD COUNTY, VIRGINIA
1" = 40' DA T: 12 -, 7 - 91
f Drf,6.wn..-G
~ NUMBE;;
SCALE
So T A nor-..
NUMBE;f
VA-58
~ ...
~ t""'"~
,AO
I :~fC(E::
! ~ ~
I RE\.-.
! ~C
DAT~
DliiIt.w","
00 031,
J. b, 3.
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVl SORS
AGENDA
MEETING DATE:
January 22, 1992
ITEM NUMBER:
3.D.3.
SUBJECT;
Refer Revised Zoning and Subdivision Application Fee
Schedule to the Planning Commission
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR' 5 COMMENTS: I
R~ 1ltJ: iL k ~d
b jJ~ ~
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
BACKGROUND:
The County Administrator plans again this year to recommend an
increase in the County zoning and subdivision fees during the
budget deliberations. The increases are intended to maintain the
same level of funding of the development review process as in the
past.
In order for the Planning Commission process to be completed in
time for the April public hearing, this item should be referred
to the Planning Commission now.
The Planning Department has conducted a study of the cost to the
Department of reviewing and managing zoning and subdivision
applications. Significant findings of this study were:
o Current fees do not cover the Planning Department t s
cost of reviewing development applications. Current
PREPARED BY~
Thomas E. Jaco
Director of Planning
ATTACHMENTS: YES II
NO [J
SIGNAT URE :
~
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
IJAN2292/A:AGENDA2/gok
00 032
BOS-9891
.
e
AGENDA ITEM
REFER REVISED ZONING AND SUBDIVISION APPLICATION FEES TO THE
PLANNING COMMISSION
JANUARY 22, 1992
PAGE 2
rezoning and other development fees are estimated, to
generate $438,000 for the 1992-93 Budget Year.
Planning Department direct development review costs are
estimated to be $700,000 - $800,000.
o There has been a substantial increase in work involved
in zoning type requests with complex issues and/or
controversy.
o Public involvement in the development review process
has significantly increased. The cost of public
involvement is estimated to be 30-35% of the total
review cost.
o The cost to review a small case generally exceeds the
fees charged; larger scale rezoning request revenues
exceeded costs.
o Administrative requests can be processed for less cost
than cases involving public hearings (i.e., the average
cost for reviewing commercial and industrial site
plans, which often involve complex design issues, is
$1,160 compared to $1,236 for an average single mobile
home permit. Over $500 of the cost of the mobile home
case is associated with the cost of the public
hear ing) .
See attached table which details the current fee, estimated
department review cost, and the proposed f~e amendments.
The last major revision to the County zoning and supdivision fee
schedule was in 1987.
RECOMMENDATION:
Refer the attached zoning and subdivision application fee
schedule ordinance amendment to the Planning Commission for a
public hearing and recommendation.
ATTACHMENTS:
Fee Restructuring Proposal
. Ordinance Amendment
IJAN2292/A:AGENDAZ/gok
00 03.3
e
e
~
w
CI.l
0
Qp...
~o
8p::tCl)
U~~
W ~
~r::I~ 0 0 0 0 0 0
~~ 0 0 0 0
,....-l \CI 00 N
11'11, ...
> ~ f'o. . \0- N
~ -ER- 0\ ~ ........
~ ~ 1""'"'t
-tR-
tIJ
~
Q ~
~ ~
E-t~
U~~
~ Z a 0 0 0 U1 0
~~~ ..:t N 00 00
o>~ M 1""""4 ~ r"'
p::;~ ...
~~ 111 C'\ \C 0
U -tA- C"') ~ r-.....
-foR- fA-
Q)O""-..
~oo Ia4
~ rJ N U') CU
< en ~ .+J
tI.l ~ ..........j.JN~
0 ~ L11 UlN Cl3 0
~ ~ -4" H.fA-aJ l.()
0 ~.n ~ 0
p:; ~ 4-t"d Q) = = = = = = ...
~ + ~~ N
tf] (J) CU-+-J -EiA-
C-' 0 o~
Z p.. Lf)+J en ...
H 0 0 aJ cu
~ p:: 4'\ ~ ~ t-.a
P-I N 0 U CJ
E-t -tIT 4-l t1j ~
0
~
p:;
E-i
U1 -4-1
~ t)
~ ..T"""I
~
~ ~ Q) +J
~ $..4 ~ tI1
~ aJ Q) aJ U QJ Q) tJ OJ ...-1
~ $..i ~ m ~ ~ co ~ -ro
tI) rJ CJ U -- tJ tJ ......... tJ.
~ ro ~ ro U") ro co Lf) CU ~
~ ......... ......... ......... \0 ......... -..... \0 .......... 0
~ OU1 0 ~ 0 0 -EA- 0 4-1
~\O N N U1 LJ1
e-. -EA- <tIT -toA- + -tR- -EA- + -64- Q)
~ Q,)
++ + 0 + + 0 + 4-4
ga '" O"e
00 11'") N U'1 U') N l..t1 aJ
::J ,...... ...::r ...:t ...:t ...::r ~ Ul
U M f'.. '-0 ,.....j ~ \0 ......-4 '" ctS
-f:A- ~ ~ -EA- -tA- ~ -ER- .f#T ~
...-.. ....-.. ,,-...., ~
fJl tIl fJ) U)
t.-4 ~ ~ l-l
OJ Q) 1""""4 Q.l al
4-4 44 ~ 4-4 4--e
b.O b.Q4-I 0.04-1 .,... OO~ 004-t
~ s:: 0 ~ 0 $..4 ~ 0 !: 0
..r{ .r-t ~ .,..., It-I .J.J .ri ,.., -..-I ,....
d ~~ ~P-i en r;::0-.I ~Oo-l
~o 0 0 ;j 0 0
<N N..c N~ "0 N.,C N,.C ~
"'-'" en UJ ~ tn tn 0
.....-t 1""""1 ct! 1"""'1 ctS H r-I to r-I ttI ..1""'1
,.....;t co <<5 U caU rot) cOU ~
ctS C ...-I C ~ "'" s:: ~ .r-i
)..I 0 ro 0 0.0 0 on r-I 0 bQ 0 OQ '0
;j .. ..-t ..l""'4 "r-! i:: "-r-I c:: nj .r-I ~ "T"""I ~ ~ btJ
...~ ~ +J ..1""'1 +J .T"""I .."", 4.J .... .ioJ .r-t 0 ~
~ ..-t .r-t ~ · ~ "'d .. r-6 '"d CJ ..1""1~ ..1""'1 "tj U .,-4
;1'"d Q) '"d ~ "'0 ;;1 J-I '"d ;j '"'(j ;:j ~
0 CJ t: --0 ~r--i ~r-! Q) ~r-t ~,...-i ""d 0
t..? 1ZI .."", 0 ..,-.I 0 (J 0 (J ~ 0 (J 0 \J ~N
~ J-tU tI'l U >< Co) ~ u >( 0 c: Q)
~ ~ (1)-- Q) ......... ~ ..........1--1 0 ......... !::a -.... H ~4Q
< "l""I < :3 ~ :3'-' ~~ t) 3:"'-' :3~
u ~
0
~ ISJ ~ ..--. ...-.. ...-.. 00 034
~ <JJ t'd ..c tJ "'0
~ ~ ~ '-' ""--' ""'-""
e e
co
1""""'1
~
~ ~
..........
U) ('f')
0 0\
OP-4 c.!)
~o g
E-4~Ul 0 Lt1 0 a 0 0 a 0 o 0 If'')
U~~ .,.....4 rl If) L1"l 1.f") 1.1") Or---O\ ~
~ ~ 00 ....:t t.f) 0 ...0 M 0000 .........
l-j~~ 4\ ~ .. ~ ~ '" U
~~ (""") ~ ..:t M f'., 1""""'1 Nt'-o......-l ~
-EI7 -&')- ,.......t ~ 0\ r'1 ...;t -tA- L./'"j
~~ -tIT -EFt- -fA- -M- ~ -f:A-
~
p::;
tI)
~
Q ~
~ ~ 0 ~ 0 t..f1 0 I..t1 0 0 COli')
f-I~ ..-I rl 00 M M If") NOCO
U~~ 00 "t 0 ...:t 0'\ M f"'o-. 1""""'1 00
~ Z ~ '"
....,~~ C"'1 "'f ...:t 0 \0 ...-. CXJQ'\Q\
o>~ ~ ~ ....-4 ....-1 ...:t ~ ...:t ~ 1""""'1
~~ -fA-. -fA- -fA- ~ -tA- ~
P-4~::J
C,,)
s::
0
~ .1""1 Q)
C]) 4J ~
QJ 0'0 ~ "M C)
~ ~O U "'t:5 ro
tJ CJ N (tj ~
tf) cU ro --...... 0 ......... ~
~ -- ......... +J I..t"1 tJ 0 +J+J
~ LI) 0 tIl~ 0 M 0 0
~ 4 C"1 H-tA- ...c= N .......... ,...... rl
-ER- -tA- -~ ~ CJ -ER- U1 ......... ...........
0 4-4"1j QJ ~ t""""I 00 M
~ + + ~4J Cl) + -EA- -EA- -&q-
tJ1 Q.) tQ4-I
0 0 o...c m 0 0 +++
~ Ln o +J Ul Q) L..t1 11") N
0 0 U1 U1 .......t C) ~ 0 ~ 0 0 1.l') Lf'") Lf)
~ ...:r ....:t ~ t--.I ~ Q) .... I' .> 0 N N r"..
P-4 N L..t'1 N ...:t 0 tJ..c N ......& If) LI) NN't
-tA- -tA- -fA- -fIT 4-ool ctJ 4-J ~ -EA- '* ~ ~~~
U'}
.~
~ .,.-4
aJ c:
=' (:
+J tV 0
.r-t N ~ ..,..
1:: tJ Ul OJ
;1 ~ Clj ttt ;..... +J
tf.) .......... Ul ......... tJ d 0 ~
~ o --+ t..rl CJ ro r-f 0 1-J
~ N \0 0 .......... ..........~ 0
~ -EA-$..4 * U'") If) ......... r-I
(1) ,..c: LI) r-I CX) "
E-t +.i-J + CJ -E:A- -ER- -64- "
Z t.H ~ 'iR-
~ 0 ctt 0 CU + ++
~ r-..... r---. +
g; O~ If''') t..t1 0 U'1 0 0 0 U") 0
~ ..r-I ..::r ...:t ...:1 '" I'- 1'0 ~,.......l.t"")
Co) ........ C LrI N M f"., 't Lf"l f'.. (""'")('"l"')\O
-EIt-~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ -EIT -fJT .f:A- -tA- ~
~
CU
~
Q)
f/J J:: :J s:
~ en ..~ Q) QJ
0 ~ aJ ~ ~ r:.= Z~
"M r-t S CO 0 0 ~ I I
.;.J .l"""I 0 r---t ..f""I ..,-i ro ,.......J,..-J
e t:I:: ..,-4 ~ 001'-4 n1 m
Ul Cl) CU ..c "'tj +oJ "M 1-1 "M ~ :> ~
Q) rJ 44 QJ 0 Q) ~ "'tj~ ~ 00 tJ 0 0
Ul >< 1"""'1 x: C QJ s:: Q) aJ H ;.... Q)4-I ;... ~~
~ ~ Q) .1"""1 c:: e 0 c: S aJ ctj~O 0 ~o..ro
~ ,....-I ..0 ,......J nj O-t U ~ Cot ~ 0 tV 0..0..>
r-I f""""I c.. 0 cU 1"""'1 0 cd 0 .w ~ Q) 0 ~ c <<0
0 <<J ~ .1'""4 ::r: ~ Ul ~ .......I ~r-lr-l 0 10J 0 0 ~
c..? C .1""'1 +J Q) C1l oJ ~~ aJ rJ] 0 +J "r-1 11) Q) 0..
~ 0 tJ r-1 ~ ~ e ~ :> tV :> r-I OJ +J < aJ C) ~ > > ~
E-4 "r-I Q) :s Q) t1J 0 al Q) ~t.HQ) r-l tJ :> OJ ..~ ..r-I .~ -<
< +J x: Z P::=r: ZO OA < ~ ..r-I ~ :> +J~
t..J "M 00 m ~4-J .T"'1 ..r-I <<! C'dr-t
"'tj "M ~1""1 ~O "d +J .;..J nj
~ ~""d ~ ...-.. ..-.. ...-.. ~ ,-...., ~ s:~ ..c ~ ~ ~
~ o ~ ro ..0 tJ "'0 Q) 4-4 C1j 0 Q)l4-4 ::J Q) Q) .~
~ u m '-" """-' ......, "'-' ......., ........, ::> <NP=1 0 U) E-i~~OO 035
.,; e .
co
,.......
~
~
~ --...
~ M
en 0\
0 ~
Q~ @
~O ..x
E--t~tI) 0 0 0 Lf) 0 0 0 0 0 U1 ~
t.J~~ 0 Lf1 r---.. 0 0 0 0 CO '-
~ ~ 00 '" C"'1 l.f") 0 lI1 I.l) 00 (.)
,...,~~ ~ ..... ~
~~ \0 1""""'1 CO 0 Ll1 ~ N 0
0'\ N -ER- t"'1 ...:t -fA- ~ rf'")
~~ -EA- -EiA- -EFt- -fAo. ~
~ -ER--
tI)
~
~ ~
~ 0 0 0 l/1 0 0 0 0 0 0
E-I~ f""""'! t'o 0 ~
UOE-t r-I -.::t l.1") L..f')
~ZZ fIl,
'rJ~~ 0 0\ t'-- ,......
o>~ ..-4 -ER- -tIT ~
~~ ....-t ..:1
p...p::jp -EA- ~
t)
Q}
Q.l t.-.
r-! 1040 CJ
Q) t'd OJ UL1'1 ro
~ 4J ~ rG '-
Cf] tJ 4-J CJ ""'-.. .u U')
~ ctJ ~ ~r-l ~ 0 tnN
~ --.... M fJl e "-... Lf)}..l-fR-
p:.., 111 M ,Q U1 -tA- ~...... J..I
N tIJ CU ;S ~ 4-4re Q)
~ -fA- Q) ~ tn -EA- + ~ .f-J
~-4-J QJ Q) cO 4-1
CJ) + =' .1""1 H + U'1.l:: cd lI") VJ
0 r-I 8 --... N4-J U] (],) N CU
P-.+ 0 tJ..Q 0 0 0 Q) ~ 0 U1 0 "ri M
0 U1 = ;j l.I1 0 .. ~ $-t QJ \0 L.r) $-4 0
~ " .'r"4 rJl N Lf) ........ 0 t) ..c: N '1""""'1 ....-I ct3 1..(') 1"tj
~ .tFJ- ~ -EA-- -tA- -EA- 4-l cU ~ ~ .E:FJ. ~ > ~ Q)
:>
.r-i
Q)
C,)
aJ
~
"d UJ
QJ ~
~ 0
"T"""I ~r-1
Q) e QJ +J
~ .1""'1 ~ rc
CI.l U~ CJ CJ
~ C1S ~ cIj bD .1""'4
~ ........;:j~ ........ c: f-I
~ Lf") en l.l1 ~..-I 0..
..:: U)T"""'i ,....., ~ 0..
E-& -f:R-aJ "' -EA- ~ m
Z 'O~ co
~ + ;:t +J + r-I Ul ~
~ r-I .T"""I ~ Q) 0
0- tJ = 0 0 9r-4
NS::.c N \0 ,... ~
U 00 ~,.-Rj ~ '" N nj CJ.)
-fRo- "-" U) 0 -E:R- -tA- 0 0 >- 0 .0
9
M 01'\. ~
.. ro Q)
,.....-I "T"""I 00"'0 ~
~ +J ~ ~ 0
...-t ~ 0 cu
$..4 Q) ~ bJl bIJ
.i-J"'C ~~ ~ ~ c:
tIl ~r-I ~ "T"""I ..c 9r-4
::1 (J] td O.f""'f ~ en "d
ro (l) 1""""4 40J J..I Ul ~ c= -r1j e
{:: ~ p.. .4-J oJ ~ cu "'d 0 Q) cu
"1"'4 ... en 4-J O,.....i ~ ..r-t +J 0..
~ aJ~ ~ ~ ;:j 91""4 ~r-I P-t 0 .i-J f/J Q)
..r-""I -ioJC"') ~ rn r-i '"l;j rJl ~ tJ ctt QJ ~ "'C
M ..r-I ~r-1 Q) d ..~ ~ .r-t ~ U tJ ;::J aJ
ro S U)+J S C1j ~ ..~ ,.-1 CJ 0 -< .,.-i Q4+J -i-J
)-I ..,-t cd ~ +..I ~ r'G OJ r-t Q) r:: m tn
~ tJ4-4 "'C' ~ en a.., I.p..f 4'l; r:::: Q ~ M ,.0 f...l nj e UJ
U] ~ 1 tJ.) <orl ;::s I r-I 0 0 ctI :=' tJ .,..-t C)
~ d QJ ~r-4 +J4-.oI -r; CJ .l""'I ro ...... 0 .4-J ~r-t p... fJ) "1""'1 4-J 1""""1
~ rc ~~ +J '"d ..,-t +J ~1""1 .i-J ~ rJ ~ ~T""""I U)
E---t ,...-I "M "tj < +.)1"""'1 U ::s OJ ~ 4-t m CJ.. ~ Q) Q)
< ~ 0 ~ e c (Ij :=' lo..I +J rl ~ C1j 0 ~ 0.. ;j ..c
u u rn ~ 0 H e e Q) ..,.., C'd ...,... +J U'J $..4 ro ,..,...-l ~
Q) (1) ::s ~ 0 Q) ~~ WQ U) ~ Q) QJ CO OJ ~
~ +J 3~ .i-J rn Q) .~ ~ :3 0.. .0 0.0 1""""1 4-t Q) 4-J :> (lj
~ <0.,..,4 aJ ~ ~,..( tV,.;.O ro CJ CU o C Q.4-t ::1 ..,-t C'd <lJ,.c: 0 OJ X
~ Ul Z cd en ~'-' ~ U)Z tJ <or-! <( 0 u:l CI1 CJj Q~ E-4P::l -;c 00 0'36
e
e
AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE CODE OF THE COUNTY OF
CHESTERFIELD, 1978, AS AMENDED, BY AMENDING AND
REENACTING SECTIONS 18.1-9, 21-9, 21.1-17 and 21.1-280
RE~ATING TO APPLICATION FEES IN CONNECTION WITH LAND
USE AND DEVELOPMENT
BE IT ORDAINED
Chesterfield County:
by
the
Board
of
Supervisors
of
( 1) That Section 18.1-9 of Chapter 18.1 of the Code of
the County of Chesterfield, 1978, as amended, is amended and
reenacted as follows:
Sec. 18.1-9. Fees.
The fees for processing
shall be payable upon submission
for tentative or final approval
following:
subdivisions by the
of the pIa ts to the
and shall be equal
county
county
to the
(1) Fer-~~entative approval $345~e8 $ 225.00
Plus, per lot. . . . . . 15.00
( 2 ) Fel'-rRenewal of tentative
approval . . . . 3il8..S8 225.00
Plus, per lot . . . . . . 8.00
( 3 ) Final approval .. . . 65":"88 475.00
Plus, per lot .. . . iI..88 3.00
( 4 ) Appeal of decision of
Director of Planning. 260..00
00 037
.
.
(2) That Section 21-9 of Chapter
County of Chesterfield, 1978, as
reenacted to read as follows:
21 of
amended,
the
is
Code of
amended
the
and
Sec. 21-9 Fees for hearings.
The cost of each hearing requested pursuant to the
provisions of this chapter, including advertisement when
required, shall be as follows and shall be deposited
simultaneously with the filing of the application or
petition:
fa+--aef1:i:ft~-:-
t~t--A~~ie~i~~~ai-fA+--~-.-.-.-.-.-.-~-.-$--3~8~e8
Pi~s7-~e~-ae~e-.-.-.-~-.-.-~-.-.-.------%e~ee
f~+--Resiaeft~~ai-fR-887-R-48;-R-~57-R-%57
R-i~7-R-9,-R-~7-R-~H7-R-MF/-MH-i-----645~ee
Pi~~,-per-aere-.-.-~-.-.-.-.-.-----%8.6e
W!~n-eefta~~~eaai-~eft~ft~-~-.-.-~-.-.--~,~98.ae
Pi~s7-~e~-ae~e-.-~-.-.-.-~-.-.-----65~e8
f3+--eemmere~ai,-eff~ee7-ifta~se~~ai--~-.----6~5.ee
PitlS7-~er-ae~e-.-~-.-.-.-~-.-7-----58~ee
W~eft-eefia~~~onai-~eRift~-.-~-~-.-.-~-$~7~ge.e8
Pi~s7-pe~-ae~e-.-.-.-.-.-.-~-.-----65.ae
fat--ee8a~e~efiai-~ses-a~a-s~ee~ai-exee~e~ea~:
f~+--M~i~!~ie-~affiiiy-e~-~we-~affiiiy-.-.-.-$~,e~e.ee
Pi~s7-pe~-ti8~~-rOr-eaea-~ai~
ar~e~-~he-~irs~-ewe-t~7-ti8i~5------~8.ae
f~t--Meciie-fteffieS~
a.--New-.-~-.-.-~-.-.~~-~-.-.-.-.-.----5457ee
~.--Reftewai-.-~-.-.-~-~-.-.-~-.-.-~----%45.ge
t3t-Pia8ftea-aeveie~ffiea~~
a.--New-.-.-.-.-.-~-.-.-~-~-.-.-~-.-$378~e.ee
P~~s7-pe~-ae~e-~-~-.-.-~-~-~-~-----65~ee
8R-:
Per-M~l~~~am~iy-er-d~pieK
aweii!n~-~fi~~-af~er-~fie-~~~s~
ewe-f~7-~fti~B--~-.-.-~-.-.-.-~-----~8~ee
~~--AMe8e-eeRa~~iea-er-~ia8Re6
aeveie~me8e7-eaeft-eeeas~e8-.-~-.--~45.88
f4t--Aii-eefte~~--.-.-~-.-.-.-.-.-.-~-.-.----4~8.ee
P%~~7-~er-ae~e-.-.-~-.-.-.-~-.-----55.ee
2
PC/BUDG93/JAN19
00 038
.
.'
(a) Amend condition of zoning, Conditional Use,
or Conditional Use Planned Development not
including any change in use
or in bulk regulations. . . . . . .. $2,050.00
fe+-Varfaftees-.-~-.-~-T-~-.-~-.-~-.-~-.-~-.------5~B.ee
fa+ (b) Appeal to decision of Director
of Planning . . . . . . . ~~e.ae
500.00
3
PC/BUDG93/JAN19
.
00 039.
~
.
e
(3) That Sections 21.1-17 and 21.1-280
the Code of the County of Chesterfield,
are amended and reenacted to read as follows:
of Chapter
1978, as
21.1 of
amended,
Sec. 21.1-17. Fees for hearings.
The cost
provisions of
required, shall
simultaneously
petition:
of each hearing requested pursuant to the
this chapter, including advertisement when
be as follows and shall be deposited
with the filing of the application or
fat--ceft!ft~~
fit--A~r~e~i~~~ai-+A+---------$3~e.ae7-~i~s-$~e.ae
~e~-ae~e
Wi~h-eefta~e~eaai-~enift~--$~4e.e8,-~i~s-$65.ee
~e~-ae~e
f~t--Res~ae8~~ai-tR-887-R-4e
R-~5,-R-i5,-R-~~7-R-97
R-~7-R-~H7-R-MF7-MH-i,
MH-~T--------------------$645~e8,-~iHS-$~8.ee
~er-ae~e
Wi~h-eeaa~~~efta%-~eaift~--$~7~ge.ee,-~i~s
exei~a~ft~-~~erre~~-o~----$65.ee-~er-aere
eash-aftafe~-aea~eae~eR
ei-ia8a-er-~e~seaai-~~e-
~er~y
W~eh-eefta~e~eftai-~6R~ft~--$645.887-~i~s-$~8.e6
iftei~aia~-~rer~er5-ei----pe~-ae~e
ea~h-aftafer-aed~ea~iea
e~-lafta-e~-~erBofiai
~re~e~~y.
t3+--eeffiffiere~ai-err~ee7-ift----$645.8a7-~iMS-$~8~e8
d~s~r~ai-----------------~e~-ae~e
W~~h-eend~~ieRai---------$~7~ge~ee7-~~~S
~eft~a~-exeitia~ft~---------$65.e8-~e~-aere
~rerfe~s-e~-easft-aftafe~
ae6~eaeieft-or-iaft8-e~
~erseftai-pre~er~y
Wieh-eeRa~~~eaai---------$645.e8/-~i~s-$5e~e8
~en!a~-~8eitt6~ft~---------~e~-aere
~~eErers-er-easft-aftafer
aeaiea~~e8-e~-iafta-er
pe~se8ai-~re~e~~y.
f4t--Amefta-eefta~e~08-e~-------Base-ree-~e~
~eaift~-------------------a~~~~~e~-~a-whieft
ieeateo
4
FC/BUDG93/JAN19
00 040
e
(a)
Zoning reclassification:
(l) Without conditional
use planned development
(2) With conditional use
planned development
(b) Conditional uses and special
exceptions:
(1) MUltiple-family or
two-family
(2) Manufactured homes,
mobile homes:
a . New
b. Renewal
(3) Planned development
a.
New Without zoning
reclassification
b.
With zoning re-
classification
57
c. Amend condition
of planned develop-
ment
(4) All others
(c) Amend condition
of zoning, other than
condition of planned
development
5
.
$2,050.00,
plus $45.00 per acre
for the first 200 acres
and $22.50 per acre
thereafter.
$4,100.00, plus 30.00
per acre for the first
200 acres and $15.00 per
acre thereafter;
$~7e~e~ee $.2,050.00,
plus $~8.e9 $45.00
acre
$545.00
$245.00
$378~e.8e $4,100.00,
plus $65.88 $30.00
per acre o~-$~a.ee
~e~-ffi~ie~iam~iy-e~
a~~iex-aweii~ft~-~ft~~
af~er-~fte-~~r~~-ewo
f~t-~ft~es for the
first 200 acres and $15.00
per acre thereafter
$4,100.00, plus $30.00
per acre for the first
200 acres and $15.00 per
acre thereafter.
$":f45..88-eaeh
eeeasion $2,050.00
each condition
$4~8~e8 $1,450.00,
plus $55~ee $20.00
per acre
$2,050.00
PC/BUDG93/JAN19
00 0.41
ill .1'..
e
.
t~, Cd) Variances
$570.00
faT igl
Appeal to Board $~~e.ee
of Zoning Appeals
relative to decision
of Director of Planning
$500.00
(f) Sign Permits
(g) Substantial Accord
Determinations
$150.00
$1,525.00
(h) Deferral requests
by the applicant
$50.00 per
request
Sec. 21.1-280. Fees.
In addition to any other fees required by the county,
fees shall be payable to the county treasurer and submitted
to the planning department upon filing as follows:
fa7--eeMMe~eiai,-ifta~Be~~ai,
ifts~~~~~ieRai-~-.-.-.-~-.-~-.-~-.-~-.--$-8~8~e8
PiHs7-~e~-ae~e-~-.-.-.-.-T-~-.-~-----45.8e
f~+--Mei~!~am~iy-res~ae8~~ai-.-~-.-.-.-.-.----8~87ee
Pi~S7-~er-aere-.-.-~-.-~-~-~-.-.-----~e.ae
fet--Mas~e~-s~~e-~iaft--.-7-.-.-.-.-~-.-~-.----5~e.ee
tat--Revisea-s~~e-~iaft-.-~-.-~-.-~-~-.-.-.----31e.8e
(a) Site plan:
(1) Original submittal, in-
cluding up to two (2) $750.00, plus
resubmittals..................$25.00 per acre
(2) Third and Subsequent $250.00 per
Resubmittals..................resubmittal
(3) Major ad;ustment to
approved site plan,
including up to two $500.00, plus
resubmittals..................$25.00 per acre
$250.00 per
(4) Minor adjustment to submittal or
approved .site plan............resubmittal
6
PC/BUDG93!JAN19
00 042
. .I..
.
.
.. . ~ ....
fe,. ( b )
Schematic plan-:-
$1,025.00, plus
$50.00 per acre
for the first 50
acres and $25.00 per
acre thereafter
fi+--M~i~~~am~iy-aRa-eeWftfte~se
resiaeft~!ai-.-.-.-.-~-.-.-.-.-$3~e.ee
PiHs7-~e~-Mfiie-~-~-7-~-~---~5~ae
f~7--eemme~eia~7-~Ra~~e~iai-afta'
in5~~~~~~eRa~-.-.-~-.-.-~-.-.--9~8.8a
PiHs7-~e~-aere-.-~-.-.-.---~5~ae
f~t (c) Appeal to decision of director
of planning . . . . . . . . . 260.00
(4) This Ordinance shall be effective upon the date of
adoption.
7
PC/BUDG93/JAN19
00 04-3.
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPE RV I SORS
AGE NDA
MEETING DATE: lT~n'l~ry?? ~ ' q q?
ITEM NUMBER:
10 il.,J4~ bki#l-;Af/
;t1ern J
.3.:tJ. J.j. a. ·
SUBJECT;
Refer to the Planning Commission for a Public Hearing
to Consider Amending Article III, Division 2, of the
Code of the County of Chesterfield, 1978, as amended,
Relating to Term Limits for the Historic Preservation
COUNTY ADMIN IS TRATOR' S COMMENTS: Commi t tee
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
The Historic Preservation Committee was established in 1987.
The Committee makes recommendations to the Board of Supervisors
regarding the designation of historic districts or landmarks
which have important historical, architectural or cultural
interest. Since its inception, the Commi ttee has reconunended
numerous sites to the Board for historic designation. Sites
reconunended ..include Falling Creek Ironworks, Bellwood Officer 1 s
Club, Castlewood, Eppington, and Magnolia Grange. The effect of
a historic designation is to preclude destruction or exterior
alterations without the approval of the Committee.
Currently, - the Code limi ts representatives from serving on
the Historic Preservation committee for more than two (2)
consecutive three-year terms. The ordinance. requires that the
Commi ttee be composed of at least one archi teet or landscape
architect; one contractor: one member of a local historial
society; and one person with expertise in the field of historic
preservation. -Given the limited number of individuals qualified
to serve on the Committee, the Committee has recommended that th~
ter~ limitation be deleted from the ord~n ce. (See at~b ched
ordlnance) .
PREPARED BY; ~ -
ATTACHMENTS: YES 0
NO 0
Steven L. Micas
County Attorney
0600:1757:B44
SIGNAT URE :
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
BOS~9891
01;";; ...
~ .,;,;."..;..
.
.
~......
I
AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND ARTICLE III, DIVISION 2, OF THE
CODE OF THE COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD, 1978, AS AMENDED
RELATING TO HISTORIC DISTRICTS AND LANDMARKS
BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of
Chesterfield County:
(1) ..That Section 21.1-25 and 21.1-26 of the Code of
the County. of Chesterfield, 1978, as amended, is amended and
reenacted :as follows:
Sec. 21.1-25 Creation of Preservation Committee
For the purposes of assisting in the administration of
the provisions of this Division, there is hereby created ,a
Preservation Committee. Such Committee shall be composed of
seven members appointed by the Board of Supervisors. At
least one (1) member shall be an architect or landscape
architect, ~ one (1) member shall be a contractor, one (1)
member shall be a representative of a local historical
society and one (1) member shall be a person with
professional expertise or training in the field of historic
preservation and historic landmarks. Members of the
Preservation committee shall be appointed for three year
terms...!... - a1t6: - ne - member - shaii - serve - fe~ -mere - t:han - ewe - fr}
eeHseeHeive-te~ms~
0603:279.txt
1/16/92
- 1 -
./ ~;
'f
J. J 1 L/- ~ a.
,"
..,
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
MEETING DATE: January 22, 1992
ITEM NUMBER;
~ >t f:j ft''1
3.D.4.a.
SUBJECT:
Set a Public Hearing to-Consider Amending Article III,
Division 2, of the Code of the County of Chesterfield,
1978, as amended, Relating to Term Limits for the
Historic Preservation Committee
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR1 S COMMENTS~
t-k ft-Lr ~ pfUItM.- ~ r{~ ~ ~
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
The Historic Preservation Committee was established in 1987.
The Committee.makes recommendations to the Board of Supervisors
regarding the designation of historic districts or landmarks
which have important historical, architectural or cultural
in tere st. Since its incept ion, the Commi t tee has. recommended
numerous sites to the Board for historic designation. Sites
recommended include Falling Creek Ironworks, Bellwood Officer's
Club, Castle~ood, Eppington, and Magnolia Grange. The effect of
a historic designation is to preclude destruction or exterior
alterations without the approval of the Committee.
Currently, the Code limits representatives from serv~ng on
the Historic Preservation Committee for more than two (2)
consecutive three-year terms. The ordinance requires that the
Committee be composed of at least one architect or landscape
architect; one contractor; one member of a local historial
society; and one person with expertise in the field of historic
preservation. Given the limited number of individuals qualified
to serve on the-Committee, the Committee has recommended that the
term limitation be deleted from the ordinance. (See atta"ched
ordinance). ~__
PREPARED BY~~' ~O\.n
Steven L. Micas
County Attorney"
YES"
NO 0
ATTACHMENTS:
0600:1757:B44
SIGNATURE:
COU~'N1STRATOR
00 044
805-9891
_/' <
--...
'',) """iI4
.
.
;:,
AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND ARTICLE III, DIVISION 2, OF THE
CODE OF THE COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD, 1978, AS AMENDED
RELATING TO HISTORIC DISTRICTS AND LANDMARKS
BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of
Chesterfield County:
(1) That Section 21.1-25 and 21.1-26 of the Code of
the County of Chesterfield, 1978, as amended, is amended and
reenacted as follows:
Sec. 21.1-25 Creation of Preservation Committee
For the purposes of assisting in the administration of
the provisions of this Division, there is hereby created a
Preservation Committee. Such Committee shall be composed of
seven members appointed by the Board of Supervisors. At
least one (1) member shall be an architect or landscape
archi teet, one ( 1) member shall be a contractor ,one ( 1 )
member shall be a representative of a local historical
society and one (1) member shall be a person with
professional expertise or training in the field of historic
preservation and historic landmarks. Members of the
Preservation Committee shall be appointed for three year
terms~ - a-nel - no -member - shB: i 3: - serve - fer -m6:t'e - -efton - ewe - f~t
eefl~ee~~~ve-~e~m~~
0603:279.txt
1/16/92
- 1 -
00 045
3t D. 1./; b ;
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
February 12, 1992
MEETING DATE: ITEM NUMBER: 3 · D. 4 · b.
Set a public hearing date to consider the conveyance of
SUBJECT; leases of real property in the Chesterfield parks system
for operation of food concessions by athletic
associations
COUNTY AOMINISTRATORt 5 COMMENTS:
I(~ +k. It,
..
ten- ~ ~
SUMImRY OF INFORMATION:
The Board of Supervisors is requested to set a public hearing
date of February 12, 1992 to consider the conveyance of leases of
real property in the Chesterfield park facilities' system for
operation of food concessions at the sites listed on the
attachment.
BACKGROUND
There are currently 11 food concession stands located at youth
sports complexes throughout the county. These concession stands
have traditionally been operated by volunteer youth sports
organizations who play on the adjacent facilities.. These
organizations help to fund their purchase of uniforms, bats and
balls, football equipment, etc. through revenues collected from
concession sales.
The first concession stand operated in the county parks system
was opened in the mid 1970's at Rockwood Park. It was operated
by the Chesterfield Baseball Clubs, Inc. In 1980-81, the first
formal lease agreement for use of the property was approved by
the Board of Supervisorsw During the next 10 years, another-l1
concession buildings were constructed. Four of these buildings
were constructed with donations from youth sports organizations
PREPARED By;iM!L~ LJ . t~ ':ittd7;
ATTACHMENTS: YES '"
NO 0
SIGNATURE:
~DMINISTRATOR
00 048
805-9891
Fe
e
Operation of Food Concessions
February 12, 1991
themselves utilizing revenue from concession sales. Eleven of
these concession buildings have always been operated by youth
sports organizations. The 12th building, which is located at the
Iron Bridge adult softball complex, is operated by the Parks and
Recreation Department.
Each athletic association enters into a standard concession lease
agreement with the county. At one time the agreement was for a
three year period. The county has shortened this period over the
years and staff is currently recommending a one year lease which
will allow the staff to better enforce the terms of the
agreement. The lease calls for a sum of 10% of the gross
receipts from all concession sales to be paid on an annual basis.
Athletic group must agree to:
-pay rent on a specified schedule
-keep and maintain separate books and records on the
concession operation
-submit all books and records to the Parks and Recreation
Department when requested to do so
-submit payment and annual financial report on receipts
and disbursements
-install necessary equipment and keep facility staffed
during business hours
-keep and maintain the concession clean and in a good
state of repair
-keep current health and sanitation permits
-keep adequate fire, hazard and liability insurance
-hold the county/department harmless of and from all
claims, suits, damages, costs and expenses arising out
of or in any way relating to the groupts operation of
the facility.
-conserve energy by shutting down all major equipment
during the off-season
The department-needs-acce.ss to these buildings for safety,
security, and maintenance. Some groups object to this access, but
this provision must be retained.
The Parks and Recreation-Department provides-electricity, water
and sewer facilities and regular trash collection.
RECOMMENDATION
Although there have, on occasion, been some problems with
non-payment of rent, lack of adequate organization records, and
limited county access to concession buildings, staff believes
that organizational operation of concession is the best and most
economical way to provide needed food service at county
recreational sites.
00 047
. ..
e
e
In addition, concession sales are a major fund raiser for the
youth sports organizations and these funds are an important part
of the county's overall recreation resources. Accordingly, staff
recommends that the Board of Supervisors approve this request and
set a public hearing date to consider the leasing of county
concession buildings to youth organizations.
Attached to this item is a listing of all concession building
sites and the current operators of those sites. Also attached is
a form lease agreement.
])iJ-fnl:J- (!j6iV Hill
00 048
e
.
Real Property (Facilities)
Current Lease Holder
Bensley Concession Building
Chalkley Athletic Complex
Rockwood Park
Point of Rocks
Ettrick Park
Bensley Athletic Assoc.
Chalkley Athletic Assoc.
Chesterfield Baseball
Clubs, Inc..
Chesterfield Girls
Softball
Enon Athletic Assoc.
Ettrick Youth Sports
Assoc.
Harrowgate Athletic
Assoc.
Huguenot Little League
Matoaca Athletic Assoc.
Chesterfield Baaseball
Clubs, Inc.
Chester Sports Boosters
Bird Athletic Complex
Harrowgate Park
Robious Athletic Complex
Matoaca Park
Iron Bridge Park
Goyne Park
00 049.
e
e
LEASE AGREEMENT
THIS AGREEMENT, made this
day of
,199 by and
between the COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD t VIRGINIA ("Lessor") and
(flLessee").
WHEREAS, Lessor owns and operates a recreational park in
Chesterfield County, Virginia, known as
, located
in Clover Hill District t in which there has been constructed a concession
facility, and
WHEREAS, Lessee desires to operate the concession facility to offer
food, beverages and other products to the general public using such
facility.
WITNESSETH:
That for and in consideration of the mutual covenants herein con-
tained t Lessor hereby grants and the Lessee hereby accepts a nonexclu-
sive
lease
to
operate
the
concession
facility
located
at
upon the following terms and conditions:
1. The lease herein granted shall be effective for a period of
one year, commencing on January 1, 199_ and ending December 31,
199 unless terminated sooner by Lessor due to any default by the
Lessee which is not cured within thirty days after Lessee receives written
notice of such default.
2. Lessee shall pay to Lessor a sum equal to ten percent (10%)
of the gross receipts from all concession sales, including credit sales t and
said payment shall be made payable to the Treasurer of the County of
00 0 &.0
e
.
Chesterfield and delivered to the Director of Parks and Recreation I County
of Chesterfield, Virginia, ( "Director"), on Decem her 31 of the current
year; provided, however t that Lessor, upon giving Lessee thirty (30)
days written notice, may increase the percentage of gross receipts payable
to Lessor to the level Lessor deems necessary to cover Lessor's actual
costs relating to the operation and maintenance of the concession facility.
3 . By acceptance of this Lease, Lessee covenants with Lessor
the following:
a. To pay rent promptly as established herein.
b . To keep and maintain separate, adequate books and
records pursuant to the operation of the concession facility. Said books
and records to be submitted to the Director along with the December 31
payment in each current year.
c. To submit, at reasonable times when requested by the
Parks and Recreation Department of the County of Chesterfield, ("Depart-
ment") t all books and records pursuant to the operation of the concession
facility.
d. To submit to the Director along with the December 31
payment in each current year, an annual fina.ncial report of all receipts
and disbursements pursuant to operation of the concession facility.
e. To install, at the Lessee's expense t all necessary
equipment, approved by Lessor, for operation of the concession facility
and to keep same adequately staffed during business hours (I
0903:6057:57
- 2 -
00 061
.
e
f . To keep and maintain the concession facility and
appurtenances thereto neat, clean, and in a good state of repair; normal
wear and tear excepted.
g. To secure and keep current all necessary health and
sanitation permits required by law, and any and all other licenses or per-
mits as may be necessary or required by law for the operation of the
concession facility.
h. To secure and keep in force adequate fire and hazard
insurance upon the contents, and public liability insurance naming the
County as co-insured in an amount not less than $500,000, and to provide
the Director with a Certificate of Insurance which indicates that the Coun-
ty is so named and so insured.
i. To indemnify and hold Lessor harmless from any and
all claims, suits, damages, costs and expenses arising out of or in any
way relating to Lessee's conduct and operation of the concession facility,
and from any damages, claims or suits based on personal injury or proper-
ty damage caused by Lessee's negligence.
j . To keep the area in and around the immediate vicinity
of the concession building free of litter and debris..
k. To file for the Director's approval, a schedule of
items to be sold for human consumption and the prices to be charged,
prior to the commencement of operation. Upon approval, neither the items
to be sold nor the prices shall be altered, amended or modified without
prior approval of the Director.
0903:6057:57
- 3 -
00 062.
.
e
1. To immediately report any theft of merchandise, per-
sonal property, cash t checks or credit slips to the police and the Direc-
tor.
m . To assist in the conservation of energy by shutting
down all major equipment during the off season.
4 . Lessor and Lessee mutually covenant and agree that:
a. Lessee has inspected the concession facility and agrees
to accept same in its condition as of the date of this contract. Lessee
shall not make any alterations or additions to the leased premises without
the prior written consent of Lessor. All alterations t changes and improve-
rnents built, construct~d or placed on the leased premises by Lessee, with
the exception of fixtures removable without damage to the premises and
movable personal property shall, unless otherwise provided by written
agreement between Lessor and Lessee, become the property of the Lessor
and remain on the demised premises at the expiration or sooner termination
of the Lease. Lessee agrees that the cost of any replacement keys and
changing of locks after Lessor's initial provision of same will be borne by
Lessee.
b . Lessor shall not be liable for damage to any property
or injury to any person in J on or about the concession facility from any
cause whatsoever.
c. Lessor shall have access to concession facility at all
times, and shall have first priority for use of said facility in the event of
0903:6057:57
- 4 -
,-
00 063
e
.
a scheduling conflict between Lessee and Lessor. Lessor shall give Lessee
at least 30 days r notice of Lessor's intent to use said facility.
d. Lessor shall provide, without additional cost to Lessee,
electricity, water and sewer facilities, and regular trash collection.
e . Lessee shall not assign this Lease nor sublease the
Leased Premises without the prior written consent of Lessor, which will not
be unreasonably withheld. Any attempted sublease or assignment without
the consent of the Lessor shall be void and of no force or effect.
f. All items of indebtedness or damage under these cove-
nants shall be considered as items of rent and Lessor shall have the same
liens and the same remedies for the collection thereof as are provided
herein and by law for the collection of rent.
g . Upon the breach of any covenant contained herein or
the abandonment or vacation of the premises by the Lessee, or the failure
to p~ovide the required Certificate of Insurance, books, .records, financial
reports or payments, the Lessor may, at its option, immediately terminate
this Lease, and shall have the right to enter the premises at once and
take possession thereof, including improvements erected thereon. Such
termination or possession t however, shall not deprive the Lessor of any
other action or remedy for possession, rent or damages.
h. In the event the demised premises are condemned, in
whole or in part, or otherwise acquired by a public authority, this Lease,
at the option of the Lessee, may thereupon be terminated and the Lessor
shall not be liable for any inconvenience or damage to the Lessee caused
0903:6057:57
- 5 -
00 064
It
.
thereby. The Lessor reserves the right to condemn as provided by law
and such action by the Lessor shall constitute a means for termination of
this Lease without penalty.
5 . Lessor and Lessee agree that this Agreement constitutes the
entire agreement, understanding and representation, express or implied t
between the parties. This Agreement supersedes all prior written or oral
agreements or proposals between the parties.
6 . This Agreement shall be governed by the terms herein. Any
dispute concerning this Agreement shall be resolved in the Circuit Court
of the County of Chesterfield. This Agreement is deemed to have been
made in Virginia and shall be construed under the laws of Virginia.
7 . This contract is expressly contingent upon the approval of a
resolution duly adopted by the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield Coun-
ty t which approves this contract and authorizes its execution by the
County Administrator.
WITNESS the following signatures and seals:
LESSOR:
COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD t VIRGINIA
By:
Lane B. Ramsey
County Administrator
0903:6057:57
- 6 -
00 055
.
Approved as to form:
Barbara E. King
Assistant County Attorney
ATTEST:
0903:6057:57
Title:
.
LESSEE:
By:
- 7 -
00 056
::1
3 t D. 5.
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVI SORS
AGENDA
January 22, 1992
MEETING DATE:
ITEM NUMBER;
3.D.5.
SUBJECT: Approval of Utilities Contract for Conner Office Warehouse
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
R~orKhJU+(d 11~
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
Staff requests that the Board approve the contract for 89-0837,
Conner Office Warehouse.
BACKGROUND:
This project includes the extension of 1373 L.F. + of sewer mains;
1160 L.F. + water lines of which 165 L.F. + of the-S" water line is
off-site. -Staff:is.recomrnending approval of the refund.
Developer:
Contractor:
Douglas G. and Jean C. Conner
Excalibur Construction Corporation
Contract Amount: Estimated Total $51,552.00
Total Estimated County Cost:
Water (Offsite) $ 1,417.35
(Refund thru connections)
Estimated Dev~loper Cost: $50,134.65
Code: (Offsite) SH-58350-890731E
PREPARED BY~
ATTACHMENTS: YES"
NO [J
J. E. Beck I Jr.
Assistant Director
of Utilities
SIGNATURE:
~
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
00 05Z
805-9891
..
f
t""+"'
<1.
..
.
Agenda Item
January 22, 1992
Page 2
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the ,Board approve this contract and authorize
the County Administrator to.execute ~ny necessary documents.
.
DISTRICT:
Midlothian
00 058
. .
-
..
-..
.
.
BACKGROUND: Information regarding refunds.
Chapter 20 of the County's Code provides refunds to developers
provided the water and/or wastewater extension meets the
necessary requirements. Refunds began in the late 1950's and
early 1960's primarily to offer certain incentives to
encourage orderly expansion to the utility systems, to promote
development, and to. make service more accessible' 'and '-.available
to areas without public utilities.
In 1985, the department made recommendations for eliminating
refunds for offsite extensions except for .the overslz1ng~
costs, however, the resulting goal obtained was a
restructuring of the refund provisions in effect at that time
by providing less refunds. This resul ted in a reduction in
the Developer's eligibili ty to receive refunds for offsi te
costs (excluding oversizing). The purpose for the
restructuring was to encourage "in-fill" development within
existing available utility systems rather than "leap-fragging"
growth.
The County's current "Refund Policy" allows for certain types
of refunds which are classified into three (3) categories
listed in IIpriority" order:
A. Additional Work: Extension of the water or
wastewater system that the County required of a
developer to serve properties beyond the property
being developed at the developer's expense provided
that the developer be eligible to receive a refund
of 100% of the cost of such extension and shall be
repaid prior to the repayment of any other costs
subject to being refunded.
B. Oversize Work: Extension of the water and
wastewater line which is larger than the line needed
to serve the developer's property (calculated with a
minimum line size of eight inches in diameter).
This. refund amount is second. in the order of
priority which means that once the cost of the
addi tional work (if any) is refunded, the cost of
oversizing will be refunded next.
c. Offsite Work: Extension of a water or wastewater
line between the existing line and the developer's
property. Refunds are recommended for Board of
Supervisors approval pursuant to the latest County
Code and administrative policy and are last in
priority for receiving refunds a
00 059
~ .
..
.
e
CONTRACT # 89-0837
~EHENGE
I
t
~
CONNER OFFICE WAREHOUSE
00 0.60
N
3. j)~ to ~
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
January 22, 1992
MEET ING DATE :
ITEM NUMBER:
3.D.6.
SUBJECT: Approval of Utilities Contract for Deer Run, Section 7
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
Re.~ I+~
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
Staff requests that the Board approve the contract for 91-0201, Deer
Run, Section 7.
BACKGROUND:
This project includes the extension of 13,906 L.F. + of sewer mains;
9,750 L.F. + of water lines, of which 140 L.F. + of 16" water lines
is oversized. The developer is required to have- an 811 t\7ater line to
serve his development, therefore, staff has requested the water
lines be oversized to provide service to the adjoining properties.
Under the ordinance, the developer is entitled to refunds for the
cost of oversizing the water lines.
ATTACHMENTS: YES _
NO D
PREPARED BY~
(
J . Beck, Jr.
Assistant Director
of Utilities
SIGNAT URE :
c-ftJf
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
00 081.
BOS-9891
"-- .........;.... ~.. ~.
e
e
Agenda Item
January 22, 1992
Page 2
Developer:
Contractor:
William B. and Gene H. DuVal
Coastline Contractors, Inc. (Sewer)
and
Bookman Construction Company (Water)
Contract Amount: Estimated Total
Total Estimated County Cost:
Water (Oversizing)
(Refund thru connections)
Estimated Developer Cost:
Code: (Qversizing)
$368,477.00
$ 6,481.40
$361,995.60
SH-58350-890732E
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the Board approve this contract and authorize
the County Administrator to execute any necessary documents.
DISTRICT:
Matoaca
00 O~2
.. .~- ."!......
e
e
BACKGROUND: Information regarding refunds.
Chapter 20 of the County's Code provides refunds to developers
provided the water and/or wastewater extension meets the
necessary requirements. Refunds began in the late 1950's and
early 1960ls primarily to offer certain incentives to
encourage orderly expansion to the utility systems, to promote
development, and to make service more accessible and available-
to areas without public utilities.
In 1985, the department made recommendations for eliminating
refunds for offsite extensions. except for. the. oversizing
costs, however, the resulting goal obtained was a
restructuring of the refund provisions in effect at that time
by providing less refunds. This resulted in a reduction in
the Developer's eligibility to receive refunds for offsite
costs (excluding oversizing). The purpose for the
restructuring was to encourage "in-fill" development wi thin
existing available utility systems rather than "leap-frogging"
growth.
The County's current "Refund Policy" allows for certain types
of refunds which are classified into three (3) categories
listed in "priority" order:
A. Addi tional Work: Extension of the wa ter or
wastewater system that the County required of a
developer to serve properties beyond the property
being developed at the developer's expense provided
that the developer be eligible to receive a refund
of 100% of the cost of such extension and shall be
repaid prior to the repayment of any other costs
subject to being refunded.
B. OVersize Work: Extension of the water and
wastewater line which is larger than the line needed
to serve the developer's property (calculated with a
minimum line size of eight inches in diameter).
This refund amount is second in the, order of
priority which means that once the cost of the
addi tional work (if any) is refunded, the cost of
oversizing will be refunded next.
c. Offsite Work: Extension of a water or wastewater
line between the existing line and the developer's
property. Refunds are recommended for Board of
Supervisors approval pursuant to the latest County
Code and administrative policy and are last in
priority for receiving refunds.
00 063
.c. _-"'. -"'::~
~.
e
e
CONTRACT # 91-0201
\~~C~/l
[JeeR RlJn
$X.~' - 7
. e,ek. ~
. ( ..0
c. .
/
~. ;"
. I
I
/
uJ
,..
/
. /~{
. ~ .
. - .
.. .~.
.. . :.......~
.t
DEER RUN, SECTION 7
00 064
j.j)J 7.
...
~".. .
....t-~ ._ _w
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
January 22,' 1992
3.D.7.
MEETING DATE:
ITEM NUMBER;
SUBJECT:
Award of Construction Contract for Project #89-0918 Water
Rehabilitation - Phase II
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
Re~ AwCV\.cl. 6 ~o..c:k
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
This project involves replacement of old water lines which are not
of adequate size to provide fire protection and which are frequently
failing causing interruption of service to customers. Lines to be
replaced are located in Wake Avenue, Milo Road, Shop Street, werth
Street, Central Avenue and the Chesterwood area.
Bids were received ranging from $298,952.00 to $452,759.00. The low
bidder was Richard L. Crowder Construction. This project is part of
the approved Capital Improvement Program and funds have been
appropriated.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the Board award the construction contract to
Richard L. Crowder Construction and authorize the County
Administrator to execute the necessary documents.
DISTRICT:
Bermuda
Clover Hill
Dale
ATTACHMENTS: YES JIS
PREFMED BY~ ~/~.....J-
Craig S. Bryant
Assistant Director
of Utilities
NO []
SIGNATURE :
~
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
00 065
. ~
805-9891
~_ f:J;'
,....
e "
e
HENRJCQ
COUNTY
PRINCE
GEORGE
COUNTY
PffiRSBURG
VICINITY MAP
2 3
J MIlES
6
00 066
N
o
J-
jlj)~8~
'\. '
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVl SORS
AGENDA
MEETING DATE: January 22, 1992
ITEM NUMBER:
3.D.8.
SUBJECT: Request for permission to Encroach on an Existing 8' Alley
Easement
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
RI!,c-~ a'r
SUMMARY OF INFORMAT ION:
Mr. and Mrs. John F. McKain have requested permission for a portion of
a garage to encroach on an existing 8' alley easement on Lot 11, Block
AI Marlboro Subdivision, as shown on the attached plat. This request
has been reviewed by the necessary County staff.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff reconunends that the Board authorize Mr. and Mrs. McKain to
encroach on the 8 ' alley easement, as. shown on the attached plat
subject to the execution of a license agreement, which provides that-
they will be responsible for any damage done to the structure caused by
County maintenance of the drainage improvements located wi thin the
easement.
DISTRICT: Dale
PREFMEtr"8Y~
John W. Harmon
Property Mgmt. Supervisor
Utilities - Right of Way
ATTACHMENTS: YES ~
NO D
SIGNAT URE :
~
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
00
808-9891
V ll.; i.N 1..L- I ~I\..ri-l.-l.,;n
REQUEST FROM MR. WRS. McKAIN TO ENCROACH O~ EXISTING EASEMENT
.-. .. .. t ON' La,.., BLOCK A, MARLBORO SUB~SION
;. ..-
N
TRAMP~
FAF
00 068
........,1
--.. ....
..
~ +'
e
e
OfcUncr: John r. & Mar4 Lou ILl. /v1ck:aln
Ll.8. 83=3 p- 51'7
iJoi-/
8;
8'
LOT Ie
Date:/e./Ca ~I
Scale: } 11-=80 I
Job NO..:../9/JOB8B
Lo t G' \
1
JlL:D9055'-30"kJ-- /OO.Oc;;
I Lo t B
1-..
/0000" .~~
. ~~r~ALTH O..~. ~4..
.c::r ~ II .... 0'" t./:.. "ll
1ft- ~ J""" ..- ~ ~ "$,
{t~~'~~~t
.q No. 1613 :-
.. 'Q.
. ~
,
8
(\j
~
,6tt-/sf-i179 F\' Cj//e4
12a0cflT)en~
Lot / /
Bloc J::.. J~"
~ I
8' 5'
-POR\\c:.-..\ O~ bb...~e:.
\,r.l\J. \~ 'E:.l-l~~\J.e..~ \t-l
8 ~oor t:-...\..L€.'\ ~et-\e.~T
f
~
~
,
fQ
..
,
~
I
i-----------
.,
:Jt:c, (j; II
elJ./5i7ng iJIdeJJ //79 2.-5'
L.
,
q,
~
\()
-5G8 ~Gr45;C
?c:j€LICjMf:;/fT
50 .; eJcu
p~-r 5HOLU/rtCr
~ '0 ejLLeY ~,e/VIeNT
-::.J . ljc.e~ ~-r /1)
BLOCJC I~" ) M~BoeD
D?9L,e D/5Te/GT
CHE;5TJ5JeFJ15L,Q Cct.JIi7Y; V I.eGIf'f /Lj
· PLANNERS. ARCHITECTS · ENGINEERS. SURVEYORS.
501 8ranchway Road. Surte 100 . Richmond, Virginia 23236 . 794-0571 . Fax 794-2635
1514 East Parham Road. Richmond, Virginia 23228 . 262-6048 . Fax 264-3037
....
8
~
~
LOT /0
+4O.eB~ ro ,cll-t
of Lancers
Blvd. e!t f 'd~
~
dt D ~ 9,
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVI SORS
AGENDA
-(-
MEETING DATE: January 22, 1992
ITEM NUMBER:
3.D.9.
SUBJECT: Request to Quitclaim Portions of Easements no longer
necessary in conjunction with the James River Trunk Sewer
Project
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR1 S COMMENTS:
Re,~ II~
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
George F . and Suzanne Y. Hoover have requested the qui tclaim of a
portion of a 20' sewer easement and portions of two 40' temporary
construction easements a~ross their property .off of Old Gun Road West,
as shown on the attached plat. The portions of easements are no longer
needed, due to the realignment of the James River Trunk Sewer. This
request has been reviewed by staff and approval is recommended.
RECOMMEND.ATION:
Staff recommends that the Board authorize the Chairman of the Board and
County Administrator to execute a quitclaim deed to vacate a portion of
a 20' sewer easement and portions of two 40 I temporary construction
easements across property owned by George F. and Suzanne Y. Hoover.
DISTRICT: Midlothian
PREPARE
f1J-J~~
ATTACHMENTS:
YES'
NO [J
John W. Harmon
Property Mgmt. Supervisor
Utilities - Right of Way
SIGNATURE:
Cd~MINISTRATOR
00 0.70"..1
BOS-9891
V 1 Llr;1.l J. I. L)n",.r.r ~ \....0
REQUEST FROM MR.~S. HOOVER TO QUITCLAIM.TIONS OF EASEMENTS
NO LONGER NECESS IN CONJUNCTION WITH JAM IVER TRUNK SEWER
/<<.;. ... ... ) {
...
:N
.00 07'J;
- ..,.
..~
1 ~.
.
0:,"-
' . ,....
.. .. ~
r'1
E~ ~ ~
~~ ~
~Cf ~
~~ ~
~~ ~
~ ;
~ ~
~ ~
C) ~
~ ~
t
t
"I
~VJ
}. ~
Q~
9
~~
~~';l
~~i
~~
~i'
E
()
~
).
.:Q
VI
r9~
}. ,.
..... :"l
'i'J ~
...
tl'l
:g
~
~
i
~~
n~~
~~~
~).~
Villi
~"'<
'~)
~fl
I
I
.......------..----
~a
~~
t)C)
~t~.
~~
)::l~
r~
~
~~~
~~~
~bi~
~~~
it .-"
Q~Jl.
~
~
~
~~
~~
ii
~~
~t
~"ot ~
\ ~
;'<.. I
~ \'vpt /' / '----;
-;0 ~ >~~
ce~~
~~~ ~d~~E~
~ <?"O 51"
\.II-
..--~I~....,r
I
41..\~
,~"S?' "
..!~iq
~WI~E
;i E~~~
s# f)~~
~~.
.
~
l.'l
00
072
s ~J;>. JO '
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVl SORS
AGENDA
January 22, 1992
MEETING DATE:
ITEM NUMBER;
3.D.10.
SUBJECT; Acceptance of a Parcel of Land- for Wylderose Drive and an
Extension of Wylderose Court from Oliver D. Rudy, Trustee
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
R~ It~
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
Staff requests the Board to accept the conveyance of a parcel of
land, containing 1.33 acres, for Wylderose Drive and an extension of
Wylderose Court from Oliver D. Rudy, Trustee, and to authorize the
County Administrator to execute the necessary deed. This dedication
is a requirement for the Planning Department for the Summerville
Development. The roads will be constructed at the developers'
expense and the deed will not be recorded until construction is
complete or bonds posted to ensure completion.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the Board accept the conveyance of this parcel
and authorize the County ,Administrator to execute the necessary
deed.
DISTRICT:
Midlothian
ATTACHMENTS: YES"
NO D
John W. Harmon
Property Mgmt. Supervisor
Utilities - Right of Way
SIGNATURE:
~
COUNTY AOMIN1STRATOR
00 073
808-9891
'" (~
)-'
-r,
VICINITY SKETCH
ACCEPTANCE OF AAulCEL OF LAND FOR WYLDERA DRIVE AND
./ .EXTENSION~~WYLDEROSE COURT FROM O~. RUDY
POWERHAM !l
~
:ta::--:
b,
!I
II
I
l
\)
'---
\
ri War7 \
Midlothi~ __ _ _ ES / \
11
00 074
.- f.'
-.- i
4.;
h~ ~.u\JL.:u
~.~~ l~. ~~
~ l.- ~ U ~-;:;..-
~ S 8 o~ #/;~.-
lQ~ ,p /"
0--.~V
~\
~ -;/ ~ \ ~~
/ ~8
/~ ~~
/' &
~
t
E
~
l)
Q
~
.~
~
~
l;f,
.
.
f
,
.
;}.....
~=t::
~
q)
~
.Q
i...-~
.R~
.~SA
Q?"
~~
€lJ
CI
~lJ
~! ~
E ~
8
~
U
\l
Q
~
C:)
Q
".JN1.~~.s -
~
u
0
m
-;;
:t
~
~
~
..t::
-~
~
e
Q '*
...
~
o
~
~
m
D..l
~~
~~
~Jt
~~~
~~~
E g.t
QotJ
B ~..
VI ~ Q
~\~ ~
4: e (1.
~ 1:1i
~i~
~S
00 075
808-9891
""
.
- ...
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGE NDA
MEETING DATE :
January 22; 1992 ITEM NUMBER: a..p. II.
SUBJECT:
EMERGENCY ITEM Bingo/Raffle Permit
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
The County Attorney's Office has reviewed the following
application for bingo/raffle permit and has determined that the
application meets all statutory requirements:
Organization
~
Bingo/Raffle
Year
Bensley Athletic Association, Inc.
Saturdays from 5:00 p.m. to
12:00 p.m.
1992
ATTACHMENTS: YES C
PREPARED BY: I ~
Steven L. Micas
,County Attorney
NO []
0903:bingo21:30
SIGNATURE:
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
....
& .
APPLlCAI'I R A PERMIt m OONDUC't lINGO CAKES OR RAFFLES
The under.lgned app1 ic..tlon. pur.uant to 118.2-340 .1, !! !!!l. of the Code of Virgt nla. reque. tl the Board 0 f
Supervl.or. of OIelterfleld County to tlwe . pemit to eGnduet blll10 J.De' _' rafflu _' or both L.
tfuring the /99/-/11J..ealendar ,ear. nil ~pltc.tton I. for a hew ____._O}: renewal ____ pet'llllt. In
aupport of this application: the applicant offer. the followinR information und~r oeth:
1.
1'rop~r _ of ora.nlutton:. B~J]~/(' tj. I1lA !€-i/~ 11~>-5..c!J.c~f(CJ.[J , rN(' , ·
Addnu of orpntuUon'. be.dquuten: (fl () :=5 Q G-Rl t'J. +Ov\ . fd ' .
2.
3.
Address were all records of receipt. and diabur.ement. are peraanently filed:
4030 Ge; h-\-o (\ KA. K I~ N'\.Q ~J I ~~ d 32'5<{
f ( · r\
Jl_~ 8!Jd address of owner of tbe property de.erlbed In 3 above. It') h 1'"\ ..J- N\ f\- Y.' Y\ -e t-:f> ,'r~~ OJ
&,CJ30 G~'h-:bD. ~ J ~cl. rAf'lN c\ , Vrr-- ;;;(5 d 3l[
~ - .. . - . ... ~- J
4.
5.
Address or addre.sel Where bingo lame' viII be beld or raffle dr~lnll conducted:
~/~ t+ (I bv€-~-I- !),Jf
/S'6(j g
J~l"sat\. DflVI s ~ I cjJe..&f.f"~\-~JJIU4.
;23~3 ~
ROtE: tHIS PERMI! IS VALID ONLY AI I'HE ABOVE LOCA710N.
6.
D.lte. or day. of weelt and tl- wen blnso I_e. cr ...ffle. will be be ld at the above address (es) :
So-III r cd O-j
S!b rs~ YY\
+-a f;).~ 00 f ~ ·
S/oQiJ~
i/
7.
%LIte patron. are .dmltted and ..1ea bea1n:
I.
Date wen organization v.. founded:
/9S~
9.
.... Jour or.lnizatlon been in exlatence and llet "gularly In DJe.ate1"fleld County for two years
baedlately prior to ~kiDJ thil applleationt Yea ~ "0
10.
I, your Orlanl!ation eurrently and b.. fOUT arB_nizltioD alvays be~n operated in the past .1 .
non-profit organization! Yea ~ No
u.
Internal Revenue Code leetlon for tax-exempt .tatu. ...., p-etec! (if applicable)
St.u the .peeifle type and JII1~Olll! of your or.anti.uon: ill 11 N - ;0 r-o -f}; I )lcJ U +11
SpOf-'f-c, lli So~t~-\-(~ A J f /YJ~.;'d-e n PP(H-~(rrl-~ i:1 ~ r
Y^Lrt--R ~ fo.rt,Q.,lfll.J--p'((\ Or~~'LLej. Sp(')r-t-S
13. If renewing a permit. were flnanelll report. filed on time and in compliance with applieable lesal
requirement.? Ye.....L. No
12.
14. Lilt below aTOI' receipts, if any. from all .ouree. ret.ted to the operation of bingo games or inltant
bingo by e.ltnd~r quarter for the 12.month period immediately prior to the date of this .ppl1catlon:
l"'t"~qtr,::!;S.;- 0 2nd qtr: S c:J
. ,:,,\.~ - w~ L~:.~/t;,? '''-:,
1.S~',Cj9fiii:er'.~ ";9f~:6r~:~nization: .
IT ~1 i~ f, -. "~)"~ ~ ~. .
" .n ~ -::, 'rea td~7!t: .:::: '; ~ bI. Vrs..t
\:', f ~"',~:--, ') r '-:) '-.;-" Q.l .:7 0 \ ,_', --' ~ ) \ .
"~.::::~::~~~!~~.!"I:I!l:t~~iit: {.I 'tn ~ ieN!.e.rq ~ <;;
,.....:.:J,~~.~.~.~..,ry.;. Be.. U~$~ ~~tt
. tnuurer : /IA 1\-'" I Y\ {l -.Qo ~. -~
3rd qtr: S .~ 4th qtr: S ()
R~~
ill!:!!.!. BUI. Phone
:?o-e I D v~~ RR
30 r 3 D t);;dltS W 7V? --00
Rome Phone
7'13 - <11;2 7
7f( 3 --6{j Z.2
~ ~ 3' 0 G~Ln {.e" ~J.
16. Member authorized within the organization to be responsible for condu~t and optrltlon of bingo lames or
r.fll~l: Name: Leu ~'(--r-{s I Addres.:
Hom! Ielephone Number Busine.. 7el!phone Number:
17. Do you, and each officer, director .nd member of the organization fully understand the following:
A. It 18 . viol.tion of lev to enter into - contract with any person, firm, association, organization
(other than an~ther qualified organization pursuant to 119.2-340.13 of the Code of Virginia),
partnership or corporation of .ny classification whBtso@ver, for the purpos! of organizing.
..naging or conducting bingo lames or_. raffles 7 Yes ~ No
-ovt:r-
cdl166B=C42
B.
the organization ~.t "int~and flle with the County's Intern81~it Dep.rtmen~ ~ompl~te .,
records of receipts and dlaburaements pertaining to bing~ lames .n~ffles .. required by S~at~
and Coun~y Law. and that auch record. are lubject to audit by the COUnty'. Internal Audit
Department? Yes ~ No_
c.
!he ot'gen1zatlon DJlt remit an eudlt ~ee of 1% of grOIS receipt. with the Annual F1n,anclal Report
bot later than November 1 unless Bross receipts are less than $2,000? Yes ~ No ~. ·
D.
!he organization must furnish _ complete list of its ~mber5h1p upon the requeat of the County
Internal Audit Department or.other des18hated representative of the Board of Supervisors?
'Yes' ~ 'Ho ~~ ~ . · '.'" I " .' . , .',
r
E.
- , ,.. '. 'I, r
Any organization found. In violation of 118.2-340.10 of the Code of VlrRinla. authorizing this
permit is subject to hav1ns .uch pe~it revoked and any organization or per'on. .hareholder,
-sent. member or employee of luch oraanlzation who violated 118.2.340 or Article 1.1 of Chapter ~
of ~1t~e 18.~ f;)f the Code of;Vlralnla. ":'8' b~ .i\!11ty of ~ f~l~ny? ~e.., ~ _ .~o _~ - '
F..
7he,organ~zatlon must pro~1d~ ~ltten notification to the County Internal Audit Department of any
ch~nge in elected offlc~rB or b1nao ~halrper8on during the ~.l~ndar ye~T eoveTed by this permit?
Yes V ~_, No _ ~ . - J \' \ ~ _'_: ~ . .' I.' '-. j. .' l " ~. .
18. Your organization ~ attach. copy of the prganiz8tion'. charter, articles of incorporation, bylaws,
or other legal documents which de~tribe the specific purposes for which the organization 18 chartered
or. ,or&an~~ed a.nd must' complete ~~e._ Resolut~on below. .
19. ,'Your organization ~ submit a check in the amount of $25.00 payable to treasurer. Chesterfield County
al an .ppl1cation fee.
20. Additional pages Where necessary to fully compl~te this application may ~e -ttached.
21. Have you and each officer of your organization read the attached permit and do you and each officer
Agree on behalf of the organization to comply v~th each-of the conditions therein?
Yes~No_ :
/' .
22. Submit this application to the Chelterfield County Attorney's Office by aail to: P. O. Box 40,
Chesterfield. Virginia 23832 or by hand to; Route 10 and Lori Road~ Administration Bldg) Room 503.
23. 1 hereby .wear or affirm under the penalties of perjury as .et forth in 118.2-434 of the ~
Virginia. that all of the above questions have been completely anBWered and that all the statements
herein are true to the best of my knowledge, information and belief?
WItNESS the fOll~lng__.iB~t..UTe. a:d .e.l.~ .'_/._..~_~'. _. ...._
Signature ~f A;ppll~ant. ~ _ ~.
. -
, ,P~+r2.l ~l6--- ,?e.-nd e..-~<j t~s S
VJ~,.e ~ PresiJef)r '
36/ ~ DrJN'dits 'K'cfJ
7{/3 - 3 GI () Home Phone: '7 C/3 --() 0 z 2-
Name:
, ,
71tle:
Address:
Business Phone:
SIATE OF VIRGINIY).dA ~ /'
--etfl/COU~_OF l..-T~/~Wit: . .
Subscribed and sworn to before me, ~ ~e~~~,6. Notary Public in and for tbe
~County and State aforesAid, this ~ ay o~) 19 ~/ .
~'_~~#A~
., \ . otary Public. . .'
- +. - - __'-'1'--- ............
My. Commission Ex'pires: "~Ay Commj~jon 8qJires Aunust 3"Jt.199li' ,.-.
~ ,- j' ~
\ "
~ t" t.' "
....,...,. - _ -.......t.... .;..:..,,;;....~--... - '-
- I
BE-
RESOLUTION
RESOLVED TII;S aL ~,~;; of JdJ ; 1931 (date resolution paued). ~~~~,e.CI~
is hereby authorized to apply to the Chesterfield County Board of
orBanintion for the 9/9,;)", calendar yeu.'
cd11668:C42
.."
e
.
CHESTERFIELD roUNIY
lINGO/RAm!
PERMIt
By Resolution of the Che8terfield County Bo.r~ ~1 IS~~~i.or. duly .dopted on
penilisdon 18 hereby granted to !3€.1\.3"-e..c1 ~ ~ A-sSc!lC. J Wt;. to eonduct tBth"j7\ ~'~-e...,s
duril1l the c.alendar fur t-Cf.-.CZr-L ,- 19 ~9 :J. 11I1S PERMII WILL EXPlJU: .ON DECDmER 31,
thi. permllsion I. cranted subject'to the folloviDl condition.:
1. Exe~pt for reasonable .nd prope.T operating coati and pT1 zel t DO 'P1rt of the !Tos s receipts derived by your
or,anlzltiDn ~y be used for any purpose ather than (I) tho.e llwful religious, ehlrlt8ble, co~nlty Dr educa-
tional purposes for Vhtch your Orlanl%ation is .peclflcll1y chartered or organized and (11) expenses T.tlating to
~he acquilition, construetion, ..intenanee. Dr repair of any interest in the real property involving the opera-
tion Dr JOur or.aniz8tlon ADd u.ed for 1.vful relll~ou.. charitable. community or educational purposes.
2. Your or.lnlzatfon Ihall Dot enter into - contract with Dr Dthervtle employ for compen.ltlon any person Dr firm,
...oelation. organiz.tion (other than another q~11fled organization 'J'Urauant to 11B. 2-340.13 of the: Code of
Vir~tnl., 1950. .. amended). p.rtnt.r.bip Dr corporat ion of any ela.. iflu.t1on whatsoever. for the purpose of
oralnlz1ng. ~n.llnl or conductina blDIO lamel or raffles.
3. Ho person, except a bona fide eember of your organization who shall b.ve been a member of the organizatIon for at
leaat ninety (90) day. prior tD lueh ~.rtict~.tioft. .hall p.T~te1~.te in the man.gement, op~r.tfon or eonduct of
any bingo IRae or raffle; provided however, that the .pouse of any bona fide member or a ftreflshter or rescue
.quad member employed by . political .ubdlvls1on with which the volunte~r firefighter or re.eue Iquad ~mber Is
.Is.oelated IMY participate in tbe operation and conduct of a bingo lame or raffle if .. bona fide member 1s
. PTelent. In addition, no per.an .hall receive .ny remuneration for participating in the ~nalement. operating or
eonduct of any auch aame or raffle.
.. Your orSlnlzatfon ahall not ntet' into any eontTaet vi th OT othervlle employ Dr cO'Ir'I'pen,a te any member of your
Dreanlz.ticn regardins the ..1e of btnao auppl1e. or equipment.
5. Your orlanlzltion Ihall hot 8Vard any biulO prlz~ eoney or eertbandlle valued in excel. of the fOllowing amounts:
(a) no b1nlO door prize .hall exeeed twenty-five dotler. ($25.00), (b) no r~l.r bingo Dr .peelal lame Ihall
exceed one bundred' dol tars ($100.00). and (c) no bingo j.ekpot. Df any nature vhat,of!ver. Ihall uce@d on@
~~ou.and dollar. ($1,000.00). nor .b.l1 the tot.l ~ount oi.binlo jaekpot prizes awarded in Dne calendar day
exceed one thousand dolla!'. <Sl,OOO.oo).
Your OrRanl!ltton ah.tl not award any raflle prize or prizes valued at more than one hundred thousand dollars
(S100,OOO.00) durina anyone ealendlr year. In no event ahall your organlt8tlon join with any other crgani!8tlon
in .,t.bIilhing ~r contrlbutina to the ..lntenanee Df any j.ckpot. ·
&. YOUT cTSlnlz8tlon ahatl ~lnt.tn a record in VTltin& or the date. on vhleh bingo 1. played, the n~ber of people
In attend.nee on each date .n~ the amount of the receipts and pritts p.td on each aueh day. Your crganization
shall .110 maintain a reeDrd of the name and .ddress of each individual to Whom . door prize, regular or special
bingo lame prize or jackpot from the playing of bingo 1s .warded, .1 well A. the amount of such Avard. The
organlt.t1on shall .110 ~int.tn an itemized record of .11 receipts and disburl~entl. including operating costs
and use of proceeds incurred in Dperatlna bingo cames.
7. Your organlt8tlon shall not pllc.e ar permit to 'be pI aced any sl gn or signs 8dvertis ing Iny bingo tarn@ on the
~remlsts or ~ithtn one hundred (100) ,Irds of the exterior of the preMises vhere such blngo I~ 1s to be con-
ducted.
_ ^' f'r"ft _
e
Records or all bingo .n~ r.ffle reeelptl and dilbursements shall be kept and Ih.l1 be filed .nnual1y ~de; oath
with the County Int@rn81 Audit Department on a form furnished by that department. Your report .hall be submitted
to Internal A~dlt not later than the flrlt day or November or each ~.lend8r yeer for Vhtch . permit has be~n
issued and yo~r report Ihall be a utter of public record. Each repo~t ahaIl includ@ I record of the gross .
receipts and disbursements of your Drganization for the yelf period vhteh e~enced on the flrlt day of October
of the previous year .nd ended September 30 Df the current year. In addition, if Jour Drllnlz.t1on', gross
receipts exeeed $50,000 during any calendar quarter, you must file an additional aeeounting of all receipts and
disbursements during auch quarter DO later than 60 dey. fol1ovtng the last day of auch qU8rter.
.
"-
ANY ORCANlZAnON VIOLAIING nits COh'DlnON SHAU BAVE ns PERHlT AumuITlCA.ll\. ~"\)nD.
No person Ihait pay Gr Tetelve for ule of any premise' to conduct any binRo'l.amtl or ~.ffles . 8um of mon@y in
excel. of the current fair ~tket value of the premise. and in no event .hall luch .um of money be based upon or
determined by . percent.Be of the proeeedl derived from tb. bingo lame. or raffles.
J. Your organizatlon Ihall bot hold blnlo .amel IDOre frequently than tvo ealenc1ar days In eny DIU! calendar \leek
unless - .peel.1 permit I. ITanted by the Icard of Supervlaors of Chesterfield County fOT more frequent lames.
1. Your orlantz8tlon li authorized to pllY inltlnt b1nso .. . part ~f -the bl~BO tames; provided h~ver, that:
Cal Instant bingo may be conducted only at auch time al . regular bingo lam!, as defined in 118.2.340.1(2)
of the Code of Vfrainia, l. in ,rogre.. .nd anly at luch locations end .t auch times .. are .peclfled
in the bingo permit application; .
(b) Your orsanizatlon Ih.ll not derive more thin thirty-three .nd one-third percent (3) 1/3~) of tts ITOSS
reeetpts from the blnlo leel by the playing of "inatant bingo" or "bingo in any rotation";
ee) lour oraanization shall malnt.in complete and accurat! ~ecords of the dlt~, quantity and card value of
instant bingo supplies purchased .s well as the name and address of the supplier of such instant bingo
lupplfel. Your organization shall alao maintain I VTltten invoice or re~elpt from a non-member of the
ar8.nl~.tlon verlfy1ns any info~tlon required by. law; and
(d) tcur orcanizatlon .hall hOt .ell an instant bingo card to an Individual below sixteen years of age.
. .
2. In addition to the conditions contained in this Permit. your orgent%ltton .hall cettply vith all provisIons of the
Code of Vlr,lnla and the Code of the County af Chesterfield, 1978, 8' amended, Tegarding Bingo Cames and Raffles.
J. The BOlrd of Sup@rvllDrs illY de!'!y. euspend or -revoke th I! perm! t of your or gan iz I t ion for any non "ccnnp l1an ce wi th
the conditions of tbe Code Df the County of Chesterfield or the Code of Virginia.
It. M"l PERSON, SHAREHOLDER, AGENI, HEKBER OR EHPLOYtE OF YOUR OJtGANIZAnON VIOLAtInG ANY OF THESE CONDITIONS SHALL
IE ClJIlTY OF A HlSDD-ItAHOR AND UPON CONVIctION ntEREOF SHAU. BE SUBJECt TO A nHE or NOT HOR!: THAN ONE THOUSAND
DOLL.ARS OR to ro"TII1rliENT 1ft n!!: anmrt .JAIL !OR NOT tIlJU; THAN nTE'LVE HONTHS OR 80tH. A VIOLArION or rolIDITION 1
ABOVE SHAU BE PUNISHABLE BY IKPRlSONHrh't OF NOT LESS ntAN ONE YEAR, NOR HORE iRAN n\'E YEA.RS OR BY A nNE OF NOT
trJRE tHAN ONE tHOUSAND DOLI.ArtS (It COf\"FlNEHEf17 IN nlE COUNIY JAIL FOR. NOT KJRE ntAN n.riVE ItJNIRS oi- Barn.
s. THIS rm'1IY KUSI !E RENntD K! THE END OF EACH CALth'DAR YEAR BY tHE BOARD or SL'P[RVISORS.
6. TBtS PERMII IS VALID OOLY AI nil tocA7iON PROVIDED ON tHE PERMIt APPLlCAI'tltN m HOLD BIHOO CAHES AND RAFFLES.
7. THIS PERMIT OR A COPY THEREOF HUst BE POSIT.D ON THE PREMISES WHERE BIt;GO GAMES OR RAFFLES ARE (XnIDucn:D. nil!
PER.'1IT IS Not ASSIGNABLE.
BOARD or Sl'PERVlSORS
By
OtA 1 RMAN
Attest:
co~~ ADHINlSIF~IOR
,-
"Ci
l ~
~.~,. 1
, it
e
e
~
pg. 1
REVISED BY-LAWS OF THE
BENSLEY ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION, INCORPORATED
PURPOSE - Promote activities for the children of the Bensley
Elementary School District and to encourage good sport-
smanship and fellowship with proper adult supervision.
'. .
ARTICLE I - MEMBERSHIP
SECTION 1 - A member is defined as anyone eightteen (18)
years of age or over who has paid his/hers membership fee as
required by the Association. And whose membership has not been
suspended or terminated by the Board of Directors.
SECTION 2 - The Dues for membership shall be proposed
annually by the Board of Directors and approved by the membership.
Dues shall be due and payable on or before the first membership
meeting of each year for that calendar year, whereas late member-
ship must be paid by the first membership meeting in October for
eligibility to vote for the Board of Directors and Officers for
the next Fiscal Year.
SECTION 3 - Members may be suspended or expell~d as pro-
vided in Article III, Section 12, and shall not upon such suspen-
sion or expulsion be entitled to the return of any portion of dues
paid. No member shall be deemed to be in good standing who is
delinquent in the payment of dues or who is then under suspension.
While under suspension a member shall not use any facilities of
the corporation.
."'\ .
SECTION 4 - Memberships may not be transferred and may be
terminated by notifying the Secretary of the corporation. Term-
ination of a membership sha,11:not entitle a member to any portion
of dues paid.
ARTICLE II - MEETING OF MEMBERS
SECTION 1 - A monthly meeting of the Corporation shall be
held.
SECTION 2 - Special meeting of the members may be called at
any time by the President or the Boards of Directors or by a
petition signed by one-third of the membership entitled to vote
as prescribed in Section 4 of this article.
SECTION 3 - Members must be notified of all special meetings.
SECTION 4 - Each member shall be entitled to one (1) vote
at the meetings of the corporation, whether in person or by proxy.
SECTION 5 - A quorum at any meeting shall consist of one
forth (~) of the members.
SECTION 6 - A roll call will be taken at each membership
meeting.
I ,i
.
e
ARTICLE III - BOARD OF DIRECTORS
SECTION 1 - In accordance with Article 4 of the corporation's
Charter, the Board of Directors shall consist of Eleven (11)
directors elected as provided in Section 2 of this Article.
SECTION 2 - Eleven (11) active members of the Corporation
shall be elected to the Board of Directors at the last monthly
meeting (1976) of the membership. Of these members four (4)
shall serve a term of one year. and four (4) shall serve a term
of two (2) years and three (3) shall serve a teDm of three (3)
years. At the last monthly meeting (1977) of the corporation and
at the last montly meeting of each fiscal year thereafter, four
(4) Directors shall be elected for three (3) years, except for
every third (3rd) year, three (3) directors will be elected.
SECTION 3 - Active members in good standing, members ~o
have attended four (4) membership meetings for that calendar
year) shall be eligible to serve as members of the Board of
Directors.
SECTION 4 - Meetings of the Board of Directors shall be
held at such time and place as a majority of the Directors may--
from time to t~e appoint or as may be designated in the
- notice calling the meeting:
~SECTION 5 - A majority of the Board of Directors in office
shall be necessary. to constitute a quorum for the transaction
of business and acts of a majority of the Directors present at
meeting at which a quorum is present shall be the acts of
the Board of Directors; provided, however, that if all the
Directors shall severally or collectively consent in writing
to any action to be taken by the corporation, such action shall.
be as valid as.though it had been authorized at a meeting of
the Board of Directors.
SECTION 6 - Vacancies in the Board .of Directors shall be
filled by the vote of the membership at the next monthly
Membership Meeting, to serve for the completion of the te~
vacated~
SECTION 7 - Meetings of the Board of Directors shall be
presided over by the President, and in his absence, the Vice
President, and if neither the President nor the Vice President
is present, the directors present shall elect a presiding
officer f~r such meeting. The Secretary or in his absence a
director apponted by the presiding officer, shall record
minutes of all meetings of the Board of Directors.
SECTION 8 - The Board of Directors shall submit to the
active members at the February meeting a report showing the
pg. 2
. ~
.
~
f
e
e
financial statement setting forth the transactions of the
pre~ious year and summit, for approval by the majority members
present and voting a budget for the coming year. And at the
October meeting a slate of membership.
SECTION 9 - The Board of Directors shall have the power
to make or authorize all emergency expenditures necessary or
desirable for the operation of the Corporation.
SECTION 10 - The Board of Directors shall have the power
to employ or authorize the employment of all employees of the
Corporation and to fix their compensation, and to do or cause
to be done all the other things necessary ,for the operation
and maintenan~e of the corporation.
SECTION 11 - The Board of Directors shall have the power
to borrow for operating expenses from accredited lending
institutions only_
SECTION 12 - The Board of Directors shall prescribe rules
for the operation of the Corporation's facilities and perform
such other duties, not expres,sly prohibited herein, as they
in their discretion may deem to be for the best interest of the
Corporation.
SECTION 13 - The Board of Directors shall have supervison
over all committees and power to direct their effort to alter
or amend any rules or regulations prescribed by any committee.
SECTION 14 - The Board of Directors shall secure the
fidelity of. the Treasurer of the Corporation and may secure
fidelity .of the other officers or employees by bond or other-
wise and in such amount as shall be deemed proper.
SECTION 15 - The Board of Directors shall require an
audit to be made of the accounts of the corporation for each
calendar year. Such annual audits may be made by an Auditing
Committee appointed from the active membership or by indep-
endent accountants engaged for that purpose, if the Board of
Directors deems such action advisable.
SECTION 16 - Each person now or hereafter a director or
officer of the corporation ( and his heirs, executors and
administrators) shall be indemified by the corporation against
all costs and. expenses, including all attorneys' fees, imposed
upon or reasonably incurred by him in connection with or
resulting fram any action, suit, proceeding, or claim to which
he is or may be a party by reason of his/her being or having
been a director of officer of the corporation or at its request
or any other corporation (whether or not a director or officer
at the time such costs or expenses are incurred by or imposed
pg. 3
J
\
I
j
i
t
!
f
t
~
~
~
J
f.
t
r
~
I
t
e
.
upon him), except in relation to matters~s to which he shall
have been finally adjudged in such action, suit or proceeding,
or upon such claim to be liable for misfeasance or non-feasance &
in the performance of his/hers duties as such director.or
officer. In case of settlement of any such action, suit, pro-
ceeding or claim, such person shall be entitled to such indem-
ification (including the amount of settlement) as to any
particular matter, if (1) The Corporation shall receive the
opinion of independent counsel that such person was not liable
for the alleged misfeasance or non-fea~ance with respect to such
matter and that the terms of settlement, with respect thereto,
are not unreasonable, or (2) the active. members (other than
directors and officers entitled to indemification in connection
with acts or ommissions involved) present at an annual or
special meeting shall approve the settlement. The foregoing
indemnification shall not be exclusive of any other rights to
which he/she may be entitled.
SECTION 17 - The Board of Directors shall secure for the
protection of the Corporation public liability and property
damage insurance and other fo~s of insurance in such amounts
as may be deemed necessary to fully cover complete operations
of the corporation.
SECTION 18 - All checks or demands for money and notes of
the corporation shall be signed by such officer and officers or
such other person or persons as the Board of Directors may from
time to ttme determine.
ARTICLE IV - THE OFFICERS
SECTION 1 - The officers of the corporation shall consist
of a President, Vice-President, Secretary, Treasurer, Equipment
Manager and Sports Directors. Active members in good standing
(members who have attended four membership meetings for that
calendar year) shall be eligible to serve as an officer.
SECTION 2 - The officers of the corporation shall be
voted upon by the membership at the December meeting of each
fiscal year. The officers shall serve a term of one fiscal
year or until relected or their successors are appointed by the
Directors. Any officers relected or appointed by the Board of
Directors or by the membership may be removed at any time by the
affirmative vote of a majority of the whole Board of Directors.
If the office of any. officer becaomes vacant for any reason,
the vacancy shall be filled by the Board of Directors.
SECTION 3 - The President shall preside at all meetings of
the Board of Directors and Membership; he shall in conjunction
with the Secretary sign all contracts and papers relating to
the affairs of the corporation; he shall make all appointments
pg. 4
t~l~~l
L)~
. .,~-
e
.
pg. 5
to cammittees, either from the Board of Directors or the Mem-
bership , subject to confirmation by the Board of Directors,
and shall perform all other acts properl~"belonging to his office
including executive supervison of all activities of the
corporation and the employees thereof.
SECTION 4 - The Vice-President shall assume the full
responsibilities, duties, and obligations of the President
during the absence of the President.
SECTION 5 - The Secretary shall keep minutes of all
. .meetings. of the membership and the Board of Directors, shall
· tain a membership record containing the names and addresses
of each .member; shall attest signature of the officers of the
corporation when required on contracts or other papers relating
to the affairs of \the Corporation and shall have custody of
. the Corporate S~al; and shall perform all other functions normally
devolving upon such office.
SECTION 6 -.~The Treasurer shall maintain a record of all
financial transactions of the Corporation and be prepared to render
an accounting at any meeting of the membership or the Board of
Directors as may be requested; shall be responsible for the receipt
of all monies due the corporation and deposit same in banking
institutions approved by the Board of Directors; shall sign all
checks and make all disbursements on approved billings and
vouchers; shall maintain such other records as may be. required of
h~ by the Board of Directors, and shall perform all other
functions normally devolving upon such office.
SECTION 7 - The Equipment Manager shall purchase equipment,
uniframs, trophies, etc. in the amount not to exceed two hundred
fifty dollars ($250,00) per sport without approval of the
membership; . issue and cO,llect said equipment.
(\-U J l-~: L-
SECTION 8 - The Sports Director will appoint or handle the
~ction of insurance-money; recommend the coaches for the
approval by the membership; give assistance to and see that the
affairs of the teams and coaches are carried out in accordance
with the rules of the Association; and shall perform all other.
functions normally devolving upon such office.
ARTICLE V - STANDING COMMITTEES
SECTION 1 - The Pres iden t may from time to time, wi th the
approval of the Board of Directors, appoint such standing
committees as he may deem appropriate; -
ARTICLE VI - FISCAL YEAR
SECTION 1.- The Fiscal year of the corporation shall begin
e
.
on January first and end on December thirty first of each
calendar year.
ARTICLE VII - AMENDMENTS
SECTION 1 - The By-Laws may be amended at any regular
meeting of the corporation by vote of the membership present
providing written notice of the amendment has been given to
each member at least thirty days prior to the date of the meet-
ing at which action is taken.
ARTICLE VIII - BY-LAWS NOT LISTED
.SECTION 1 - Any rule not covered in these by-laws the
Roberts Rules of Order apply.
pg. 6
, .... .
It
.
pg. 7
AMENDMENTS OF THE
REVISED BY-LAWS OF THE BENSLEY ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION, INC.
ARTICLE IV - THE OFFICERS
(passed December 7, 1976)
SECTION 2 - The officers of the corporation shall be voted
upon by the membership at the December m~eting of each fiscal
year. The officers shall serve a term of one fiscal year or until
relected of their successors are appointed by the Directors. Two
or more offices may not be held by the same person. Any officer
elected or appointed by the Board of Directors or by the membership
may be removed at any time by the affirmative .vote of a majority
of the whole board of Directors. If the office of any officer
becomes vacant for any reason, the vacancy shall be filled by
the Board of Directors.
ARTICLE III BOARD OF DIRECTORS
(passed January 4, 1977)
SECTION 11 - ~he Board of Directors shall have Lhe power
to borrow for operating expenses from accredited lending institu-
tions only.
ARTICLE I - MEMBERSHIP
(Passed March 4, 1986)
SECTION 1 - A member is defined as anyone eightteen (18)
years of age or over who has paid his or her membership fee as
required by the Association. And whose membership has not been
suspended O~ terminated by the Board of Directors.
ARTICLE II - MEETING OF MEMBERS
(passed March 4, 1986)
SECTION 1 - A monthly meeting of the Corporation shall be
held.
t
~
- .~
SECTION 3 - Members must be notified of all special meet-
ings.
ARTICLE III - BOARD OF DIRECTORS
(passed March 4, 1986)
SECTION 8 - The Board of Directors shall submit to the
ac ti ve members a t the February meeting a report showing the finan~.. --: :-
cial statement setting forth the transactions of the previous
year and summit, for approval by the majority members present
and voting a budget for the coming year. And at the October meeting -
a slate of membership.
SECTION 9 - The' Board of Directors shall have the power
to make or authorize all emergency expenditures necessary or
desirable for the operation of the Corporation.
,.. ~.. · iii
e
l ~
.....
.
ARTICLE ,IV - THE OFFICERS
(Passed March 4, 1986)
SECTION 1 - The officers of the Corporation shall consist
of a President, Vice-President, Secretary, Treasurer, Equipment
Manager and Sports Directors. Active members in good standing
(members who have attended four membership meetings for that
calendar year) shall be eligible., to serve as an officer.
SECTION 2 - The officers of the corporation shall be voted
upon by the membership a~ the December meeting of each fiscal
year. The officer~ shall serve a te~ of one fiscal year or until
relected O~ their. successors are appointed by the Directors. Any
officer relected or appointed by the Board of Directors or by the
membership may be removed at any t~e by the affirmative vote
, of a majority of the whole Board of Directors. If the office
of any officer becomes vacant for any reason, -the vacancy shall
be filled by the Board of Directors.
SECTION 7 - The Equipment Manager shall purchase equipment,
uniforms, trophies,'etc. in the amount not to exceed two hundred
fifty dollars ($250.00) per sport without approval of the member-
ship; issue and collect said equipment.
- .
SECTION 8 - The Sports Director will appoint or handle the
collection of insurance money; recommend the coaches for the
approval by the membership; give: assistance to and see that the
affairs of the teams and coaches are carried out:in accordance
with the rules of the Association; shall perform all other
functions normally devolving upon such office.
ARTICLE VII - AMENDMENTS
(passed March 4, 1986)
SECTION 1 - The By-Laws may be amended- at any regular meet-
ing of the corporation by vote of the membership present providing
written notice of the amendment has been given to each member
at least thirty days prior to the date of the meeting at which
action is taken.
pg. 8
t
1
i
~
t
I
~
~
~
~
l
f
I,
. t
t.
t.
l.
~
~
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
'.
MESTERFIELD COUNTY
P.o. Box 40
CHESTERFIELD, V1RGINIA 23832-0040
. )
.
)11. !1Cf!4 k
~
,. '.\
.....
Y'
I\~U
')
HARRY G. DANJE~ CHAIRMAN
DALE OlsmtCT
ARTHUR S. WARRENt VICE CHAIRMAN
CLOVER HILL. OISTRICT
J. L MCHALE, III
BERMUOA DISTRICT
...
WHALEY M. COLBERT
MATOACA orSTRICT
EDWARD B. BARBER
MIOl..OTl-tIAN OlSTRlCT
~ LANE B. RAMSEY
V COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
January 16, 1992
The Honorable J. c. tlJackJl McHale, III
Bermuda District Supervisor
5641 Teterling Court
Chester, VA 23831
HE: Mobile Homes' in I'B" and I'M" Zoning Districts
Dear Mr. McHale:
To summarize our recent discussion, this is to advise that there are
approximately 24 mobile homes in the old business (B-1, B-2, B-3 and B-T) and
industrial (M-I, M-2, and M-3) zoning districts. The County Attorney is of the
opinion that the new zoning ordinance prohibits the Board from renewing the
permits for these mobile homes without first rezoning the property to the tlnew
zoning ordinance" or amending the zoning ordinance.
Based on a review of both possibilities, a copy of which is attached, I would
recommend the Board consider amending the zoning ordinance to allow the
consideratio~ of mobile home permits for those mobile homes curr~ntl~ lo~a~e~ in
liB" or. IIMII zonIng districts;ll
~ If it is your desire to follow this recommendation, the Board should direct the
11 Planning Commission to hold public hearings and forward a recommendation to the
~". Board on a' zoning ordinance amendment which would allow the consideration of
mobile home permits for existing mobile homes in B-1, B-2, B-3, B-TJ M-l, M-2
~and M-3 zoning districts.
If it is your desire to rezone individual properties in lieu of amending the
zoning ordinance, I will require the individual property owners to file rezoning
applications when their mobile home permits expire unless the Board wishes to
rezone their properties through your own applications..
With either option, the three mobile home renewals on your January 22nd. zoning
agenda (91SR0284, 91SR0285, 92SROI08) need to be deferred until the ordinance is
amended or the properties are rezoned.
'\ -
e
'"
j/ctuJ du cdJ ~
.
1YVt. IY1 ~
/
(UJk flc d7J ~ 20
J}n - IY7
AU) -' 5
. V6-tt-tJ,ti
if,jJ.
\.
CHESTERFI ELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
\
\
MEETING DATE: January 22, 1992
ITEM NUMBER:
4. A.
SUBJECT:
Consideration of Annual Adjustment In Cash Proffer
Policy for FY92 (Deferred from May 22, 1991).
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR- S COMMENTS:
8~J d]1 ~ fJ~ J tk,., ~ P'trfA
~~~ ~ ~ tb :JI3,OGIO.
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
On May 8, 1991, the Board of Supervisors conducted an annual work
session on cash proffers to review FY92 facility cost calculations.
An adjustment in the per lot cash proffer amount was to be
considered. Action on the issue was deferred until the May 22, 1991
meeting, at which time the item was deferred to January 1992.
staff will present information regarding the cash proffer program
including legal constraints, policy considerations, program
chronology, policy issues, and capital facility cost calculations.
"
PREPARED BY:
ATTACHMENTS:
YES V NO 0
SlGNAT URE :
did((
COUNTY ADM.I Nl STRATOR
00 07.6
B0124/Bos #4
BOS~9891
.
.
CASH PROFFERS
DEFINmON
Voluntary cash payments to the County proffered by a landowner seeking
rezoning. The purpose of a cash proffer is to recover the cost of capital
improvements generated by new development.
LEGAL CONSTRAINTS
1. Must adopt a local cash proffer ordinance providing for the acceptance of
cash proffers~ (Cash proffer ordinance adopted August 1989).
2. Cash proffer can only apply to needs created by the new zoning, cannot
apply cash proffers to existing costs or service deficiencies.
3. Amount of the cash proffer must be reasonably related to a capital need
created by the rezoning.
4. Cash may only be accepted when the future improvements to be funded by
the proffer are listed in the Countyts Capital Improvement Progr8.IIl.
5. If cash is not used for proffered purpose, it must be retuITIed to the
applicant.
POLICY CONSIDERATIONS
1. Without a cash proffer policy, all proffers will be analyzed on a case-by-case
basis thereby affecting consistent treatment of developers and preventing
a fair opportunity for developers to analyze the financial feasibility of their
projects.
2. Purpose of a scheduled cash proffer policy is to put developers on notice of
the County.s expectations prior to deciding on the feasibility of their
projects.
3. There is no "right" answer for a cash proffer methodology. Any policy must
only meet a "reasonablenessH test, that is there must be Usome" rationale
for the approach chosen even though people Inay disagree about the nbestn
approach..
4. uSimple" does not equal Uillegalu.
5. While the ordinance was amended to allow for the acceptance of cash
proffers, the adopted cash proffer policy itself is not part of the ordinance.
Consequently, the policy would be eligible for changes and 8.IIlendments
without a public hearing. (It should be noted that a public hearing was
held In connection with adoption of the policy).
00 077
P027.wpl/Proffer
u1-
.
.
CASH PROFFERS
CHRONOLOGY
July 1, 1989 - Legislative Authority effective.
August 1989 - Local Zoning Ordinance adopted.
Fall 1989 - Staff developed proposed methodology, facility cost numbers, and
policies regarding a cash proffer program to present to the Board in January-
January, 1990 - Work session with the Board of Supervisors in Williamsburg to
discuss staffs proposed methodology, facility cost calculations and policies
regarding a cash proffer program.
January 24, 1990 - First zoning case approved with cash offered for roads and
schools.
February 14t 1990 - Public hearing to consider adoption of a policy relating to
cash proffers; public hearing closed; adoption of the policy deferred 30 days.
March 14, 1990 - Residential cash proffer policy adopted. Policy included three
year Hphase-inft of the per lot amounts with a cap. A work session was scheduled
for March 21, 1990 to discuss cash proffers for commercial/industrial
development.
March 21t 1990 - Work session with the Board held to discuss cash proffers for
commercial/ industrial development. Board adopted policy to accept cash proffers
for fire protection for commercial/industrial development.
Januaty 9t 1991 - Work session with the Board to review cash proffer policy..
May 8, 1991 - Annual work session with the Board to review the updated facility
costs per dwelling unit for schools, roadst parks. libraries, and fire stations to
determine if an adjusbnent in the per lot cash proffer amount was appropriate.
Action deferred to May 22, 1991.
May 22, 1991 - Action .on an adjusbnent in the per lot cash proffer amount
deferred to January 1992. (This was not a public hearing).
August 28, 1991 - Policy amended to change time of payment of the cash proffer
(see Present Policy #6 for details).
P028.wpl/Proffer
-. 2 --
00 078
.
.
CASH PROFFERS
APPROVED LOT I CASE INFORMATION
1. 25,000-35,000 potential residentlallots have already been zoned but are
not subject to cash proffers.
2. Approximately 12,000 potential residentlallotst not included in the range
referenced above, applied for rezoning between March, 1989 and June 30,
1989 and would not be subject to cash proffers. The Magnolia Green case
wWch represents 4,886 potential lots is included in the 12,000. Proffers
(other than cash) were negotiated in this case.
3.. It190 potential residential lots are subject to cash proffers (applied for
rezoning after July 1, 1989 and have received zoning approval).
4. 30 commercial/industrial cases are subject to the fire protection proffer
(applied for rezoning after July 1 t 1989 and have received zoning approval) .
P029.wpl/ProfIer
-3-
00 079
.
.
CASH PROFFERS
PRESENT ADOPTED POLICY
A. Underlyinfl Assumptions of Adopted Policy
1. Revenues generated by growth, i.e. residential and commercial real
estate taxes, sales taxes, feest etc go to pay the normal operating
costs of providing services for new residents, but that there is
nothing left over to pay for the cOast of capital facilities needed to
seIVe these new residents.
2. Countywide averages, where possible, will be used to determine the
cost per dwelling unit of a public facility.
B. Adopted Policy Items
1. Methodology
The staff approach to determining the cost of public facilities related
to growth has been to simplify the calculations by making the above
assumptions: that any revenue derived from growth will pay all the
normal operating costs for services to new residents and relying on
the use of Countywide averages where possible.
There are five "components" involved in calculating what a new home
will cost the County in terms of providing public facilities such as
schoolst roads, parks, etc. The components are as follows:
a. Calculation of demand generators (such as number of people,
or number of students) associated with a new dwelling unit..
Staff uses the weighted average of single family and multi-
family persons per household (2.83 for FY92) and an average
number of students per household (..57 for FY92).
b. Calculation of existing service level standards for each type
of facility for which a cash proffer will be collected. Examples
of service level standards are: 5.52 acres of connnunity serving
park land per 1 tOaD people. 2.11libraty books per person, and
101 square feet of space per elementaty school child. The
documentation of actual or existing service level standards is
the most time consuming component of calculating facility
costSoa
c. Calculation of the gross cost of public facilities. The term
gross cost is used because a credit for anticipated future
revenues from a new home will be applied against the gross.
P030.wp 1 /Proffer
-4-
00 080"
.
.
Adopted Policy Items Continued
cost (d). For example, to calculate the gross cost of park
facilities, multiply the average persons per household by the
cost per acre of park/ and plus improvement cost per acre of
park land times the acres per capita.
clIO Calculation of a credit to apply against the gross cost for each
facility. Chesterfield has issued and will .continue to issue
general obligation bonds to finance the construction of public
facilities. New residents will pay real estate taxes to
Chesterfield. A portion of these real estate taxes will go to help
retire this debt. So that new residents are not udouble taxed"
(once through payment of a cash proffer and again through
real estate taxes) a credit is computed for each facility.
e. Calculation of the net cost per facility or maximum cash
proffer. This is the gross cost (c) per facility minus the
applicable credit (d) per facility.
2. Cash proffers must be used to fund projects in the Capital
Improvement Program.
3. The following capital improvements will be funded by cash proffers:
schools, roads, parks, libraries and fire stations. The cash proffer
program does not presently include capital improvements such as
jails and landfills.
4. Cash proffers will be applicable to all residential rezoning requests.
5. Cash proffers for commercial/industrial rezoning requests will be
applicable for fire protection only since commercial/industrial
rezonings do not directly create the need for schoolst parks and
libraries 10
6. At the present $2tOOO cash proffer levelt- an administrative allocation
of the proffer was approved as follows: 40% of the $2,000 is
allocated for roads and 60% of the $2,000 Is allocated for schools,
parks, libraries, and fire stations. This allocation is based on the
percentage of the total net cost of that facility and would apply in
instances where the full proffer amount is offered..
-5-
P030.wpl/Proffer
00 08.1
.
.
Adopted Policy Items Continued
7 . Payment of the cash proffer must occur prior to or at the time of
building permit application. Originally. the policy required that
payment of the residential cash proffer be bonded at the time of
subdivision recordation and that the proffers be paid within two
years thereafter, or at the time of building permit application,
whichever occurred first. The requirement that proffers be paid
within two years of subdivision recordation was included to help
ensure that new facilities would be available near the time they
would be needed for new residents. Bonding was required to enforce
the two year payment provision. On August 28, 1991, the policy was
amended to eliminate the bonding provision and the two year
payment provision. ~
8. As noted under "Legal Constraints" t there must be a relationship
between the rezoning itself and the need for a pu bIle facility. In order
to illustrate this relationship, geographic service areas or districts
were established across the County..
Since parks, libraries and fire stations selVe the entire County, the
geographic seIVice districts for these facilities were determined to be
Countywide.. Rezoning requests can be analyzed on a Countywide
basis to determine whether they create a need for additional facilities.
With respect to high schools and middle schools, the County is
divided into two geographic service districts: north of Route 360 and
south afRoute 360. With respect to elementary schools, the County
is divided into 8 zones corresponding to the current high school
attendance zones. .
To detennine road costs, two geographic service districts, one north
of Route 360 and one south of Route 360, were established. These
seIVice districts were used in calculating a road cost per dwelling
unit. The Transportation Department then identified 19 trafllc sheds
across the County. Money collected from a development within a
particular shed will be spent on improvements within that shed.
9.
In some instances, a rezoning applicant may wish to donate property
either in lieu of the cash proffer or as a credit against a portion of the
cash proffer. Property designated for donation (excluding roads)
would need to follow the Countyts "Procedure for Acquisition of
Private Property for Pu bIle Use. U Credits may be given for usable
land or improvements donated to the County with the following
provisos: (i) credit for a land or construction contribution will not
exceed the calculated cost of the facility required by the rezoning and
-6-
P030.wp 1 /Proffer
00 082
.
.
Adopted Policy Items Continued
(il) credit for roads will be allowed for "off-site" land contributions or
improvements. The value of the donated land will be based on the
acquisition cost of the property not to exceed the cost per acre used
in the calculation of the proffer. If the value of a donated parcel Is
significantly more or less than the value used to determine the
proffer, then the proffer would be recalculated. In the case of off-site
improvements, the value of such improvements would be the
estimated cost if constructed by a governmental entity.
10. Cash proffers not used for intended purposes within 15 years of
receipt will be returned..
11. Adjustments in the cash proffer amount will be considered every
fiscal year in May. Staff will recompute facility costs and credits
based on the current methodology and recommend adjustments.
Any adjustments would be effective July 1 of the new fiscal year. The
next annual update will occur in May, 1992.
P030.wpl/Proffer
-7-
.00 083
.
.
Adopted Policy Items Continued
The charts below summarize the net cost calculations for FY92 for all facilities in
the proffer program, including roads. As noted in #8 above, two different road
costs were calculated: north of Route 360 and south of Route 360. Detailed
information follows at the end of this package for each facility.
FY1992
SUMMARY OF AVERAGE NET COST CALCULATIONS
PER DWELLING UNIT
Gross Cost Credit Net Cost
Schools $ 5,927 $3t382 $2,545
Libraries 165 43 122
Parks 467 270 197
Fire Stations 305 138 167
*Roads-South of Rt.. 360 3,890 1,496 2,394
Total $10,754 $5,329 $5,425
FY1992
SUMMARY OF AVERAGE NET COST CALCULATIONS
PER DWELLING UNIT
Gross Cost Credit Net Cost
Schools $5,927 $3,382 $2,545
Libraries 165 43 122
Parks 467 270 197
Fire Stations 305 138 167
*Roads-North of Rt. 360 4, 789 2,555 2,234
Total $11,653 $6,388 $5,265
-8~
00 084
Proffer. wp 1 /Proffer
.
.
CASH PROFFERS
SAMPLE PROFFER LANGUAGE
A. Residential
Depending on the time of payment, applicants are asked to agree to the
follOwing cash proffer amounts for infrastructure improvements within the
service district for the property:
a. $2,000 per lot, if paid prior to January 1, 1992; or
b. The amount approved by the Board of Supervisors not
to exceed $3,000 per lot, if paid between January 1,
1992 and June 30, 1992, inclusive; or
c. The amount approved by the Board of Supetvisors not
to exceed $4,000 per lot, if paid between July 1, 1992
and June 30, 1993, inclusive; or
d. The amount approved by the Board of Supervisors not
to exceed $4,000 per lot adjusted upward by any
increase in the Marshall and Swift Building Cost Index
between July 1, 1992 and July 1 of the fiscal year in
which the payment Is made If paid after June 30, 1993.
B0125.wpl/Bos #4
-9-
.00 085
.
.
(B) Commercial
Prior to obtaining a building permit, applicants are asked to agree to
accomplish either (a) of (b) for fire protection.
a. The owner, developer or assignee(s) shall pay to the
county $150 per 1,000 square feet of gross floor area
adjusted upward or downward by the Salne percentage
that the Marshall Swift Building Cost Index increased ~or
decreased between June 30t 1991 and the date of
payment. With the approval of the County's Fire Chief,
the owner, developer or assignee(s) shall receive a credit
toward the required payment for the cost of any fire
suppression system not otheIWise required by law which
is included as a part of the development.
OR
b. The owner, developer or assignee(s) shall provide a fire
suppression system not otheIWise required by law which
the County's Fire Chief determines substantially reduces
the need for County facilities otheIWise necessary for fire
protection..
B0125.wpl/Bos #4
-10-
0008()
.
.'
COST CALCUIATIONS FOR
SCHOOLS, PARKS, LIBRARIES, FIRE STATIONS
-11-
00 087'
e
tut;
zo
u
~~G;~I
LO .,- ~ ,-
C\I
f8-
~:........:.~.:.,.~
~ ~.~.:,-:~:..~.:...:-
~t;lf
E~+O';:~
~.~~:
~l.~~~
~:~~:~:~;~~
~~:~~~:"'J'~.~+:~:
":.:::::.:.::.:;;::"
CIJ
Z
0
I-
:5
~
() J--. C\J M o CDj M
-l
< 0 CC"'f" "C"'J M
C'") C\J,.... co
U W '" C':)
t- a: iFF -&7
CfJr- 0
OZCfJ
'-':;C
r-
W(!J<
ZZO
-0:
W-I
C\J(Ij..J~
~<WZ
~C:~Q (l)J- l"-Ln f'.. gl ~
[tWO=:3 Cf)(jJ C\l co co (C
>a:-.J 00 OJ ..- 'V co
<we.) a:U LO c.o
Ll.c...X <!l -69- &7
o W
>
a:
<
::;:
~
~
CIJ
CJ)
Z
o
CIJ(jJ r-
..JH:! <
00:001-
O<~cn
:cCI:a:W
()~<a:
cn...Ja.u.
...J
<:
r-
o
r-
-12-
e
90. 088
e e
Public Schools
Cash Proffer
Methodology
Maximum
Gross Cost
General
Credits
Number of
Stud ents
Number of
Housing Units
Cost per Student
times
Acreage
Per Student
times
Land Cost
Per Acre
School-Age
Children Per
Housing Unit
plus
times
Square Footage
Per Student
times
Capital Cost
Per Square Foot
Percentage of
Children
jn Public School
-13-
Maximum
Cash
Proffer
Maximum Gross
Cost
GeneraJ Credits
00 089
e
e
@9Jfqg!~
ALL GRADES
0657
COSTS: ElEM ENT ARY M 100 LE HIGH
STUDENTS PER HOUSEHOLD 0..29 0.13 0615
STANDARDS
ACRES/STUDENT 0.026 06025 0.043
SCOST/ACAE 14,814 14.814 14.814
SQ.FT JSTUOENT 101 110 136
$ 8 U I LD I NG CO ST ISQ.FT ~ · 85 87 95
$ GROSS COST
S2~ 60 1
S1 .292
$2.034
@liff~l~gt}~
YEAR
AMOUNT
CREDITS:
$WGTEO AVERAGE ASSESSED VALUE
$AVERAGE ASSESSED SINGLE FAMILY
&A VERAG E ASSESSED M U L TJ-F AM IL Y
REAL ESTATE T.A.X RATE
PERCENTAGE TO CREDlT
REAL GROWTH RATE
DISCOUNT RATE
$1 OS. 006
$115.500
$36~ 386
1.09
20.SsoAJ
7.00%
7.00%
1
2
3-
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
$241
258
276
296
316
33B
362
387
414
444
475
508
543
581
622
TOTAL
NPV
S8,082
!t~~~E1a~~f~
AVERAGE CASH PROFFER:
~fgltl1lml
-INCLUDES ALL.. CONSTRUCTlON COSTS INCLUDING FEES, FURNISHINGS~
AND CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT. CONSTRUCTION COST DATA OBTAINED
FROM COMPLETED PROJECTS, RECENT 8IDS~ AND .1991 MEANS CONSTRUCTlON
COST DATA" REFERENCE BOOK
APRIL 23. 1991
FILE=SCHCREO. WKl
00 090
-14-
e
e
SCHOOL FACILITIES
BUILDING AREA AND SITE SIZE
ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS
SQUARE
~ SUI LOIN G FOOTAGE ACREAGE
1924 BEULAH 63.800 16.604
1931 GRANGE HAll 66.902 18.580
1937 MATOACA 51 .930 7.554
1954 BENSLEY' 45,000 , 2.000
1959 CURTIS 75t661 15.206
1959 HARAOWGA TE 70,837 41 .000
1959 J.G. HENING 69.733 20.274
1961 ENON 62? 671 12.500
1962 BON AIR 59.405 1 9.830
1962 CHALKlEY 74.134 20.000
1962 CRESTWOOO 6S~S47 17.900
1964 A.M. OA VIS 70,381 '4.399 ..
1964 FALLING CREEK 72.970 20.000
1966 SELLWOOD 57, SS6 18.585
1967 EITRICK 75.759 5.002
1967 J.B. WATKINS 74,553 21.720
1968 REAMS ROAD 65.56.5 15.970
1970 ROBIOUS 64 .362 13.000
1970 SALEM 65,095 30. 130
1975 GREENFIELD 63.917 '6.460 ·
1975 HOPKINS 64.172 12.465
1975 C.C. WEllS 69.037 12.700
1978 W.W. GORCON 57.740 17.448
1985 GATES 96,943 , 9.61 6
1985 SWIFT CREEK 69 .380 13.534
1986 CLOVER HILL 70,408 , 4.642
1988 PROVIDENCE 70 ~ 408 15.000
1987 CRENSHAW 70,408 1 9.673
1987 EVERGREEN ;7.000 20.974
1987 JACOBS ROAD 70,408 20~O70
1990 WOOLfUOGE 73~969 24.400
1990 ECOFF 7~~9es 266800
TRAILER SPACE 66.035 N/A
TOTAL ELBAENTARY SCHOOLS: 32 2.276~956 57 4.036
· ACREAGE ADJUSTMENT MADE FOR ATHLETIC COMPLEX AREAS
ALREADY ~NCLUOED UNDER COMMUNITY SERVING PARKS
-LAND PURCHASED FOR 8~ WEAVER AND A. SMITH NOT lNCLUOEO
IN ACREAGE TOTALS
-15-
00 091
e
e
MIDDLE SCHOOLS
YEAR BUlLO ING SCUARE .
FOOTAGE ACREAGE
1911 HIDLOTHIAN 136,798" 22. Tf2
'948 CARVER 87,985 16.049
1949 CHESTER 101;784 27.743
1963 MA TOACA 101,270 30.000
1966 FALLING CREE){ 111,548 34.620
1968 PROVIDENCE 123,491 16..536 1ft
1971 ROBICUS 136,085 27.000 .-
1971 SA LEM 135, 123 34. 180
1979 SUI FT CREEX: 132, 093 38..815
TOTAL MIDOLE SCHOOLS: 9 1 , 066, 1 n 247.715
HIGH SCHOOLS
SQUARE
YEAR 8UIlOIJ4G FOOTAGE ACREAGE
1963 MA TOACA 116,204 80.742
1963 MEADOUSROOK 186,704 50.989
1964 MAHCHESTER 166, 193 63 .370
1964 THOMAS DALE 153,463 40.000
1972 CLOVER HILL 197 f 093 49.430
1975 CHESTER TECH. 106, 199 21 .460
1978 L.C. BIRD 231,000 74.491 *
1978 MONACAN 211,428 62...717 ..
1984 MIOLOTHIAH' 232,556 68.390
iOTAl HIGH SCHOOLS: 9 1,600,840 511.589
*AcaEAGE ADJUSTMENT MADE FOR ATHLETIC COMPLEX AREAS
ALREADY INCLUDED UNDER COMMUNITY SERVING PARKS
.LANO PURCHASED FOR RlVERTOH AND SAlLEY BRIDGE (MIDDLE AND HIGH)
NOT INCLUDED IN ACREAGE TOTALS
APRI L 23, 1991
FILE:SCHFAC.UK1
~16-
00 092
e
e
PUBLIC SCHOOLS BUILDING AREA AND SITE SIZE
ELEMENTARY M!QQh5 HIGH
1990 TOTAL SQUARe FOOTAGE 29276~ 956 1 ~O95~661 1 t632~232
1990 TOTAL ACREAGE 574.04 247.72 511.59
NUMBER OF SCHOOLS 32 9 9
SQUARE FOOTAGE PER SCHOOL 71 ~ 155 12L740 181 ~359
ACREAGE PER SCHOOL 17.939 27.524 56~843
NUMBER OF STUDENTS (1) 22.481 9.987 12~ 012
SQUARE FOOTAGE PEA STUDENT 101 '10 136
ACREAGE PER STUDENT 0.026 0.025 0.043
(1) ENROLLMENT FIGURES PROVIDED BY SCHOOL'S PLANNING AND
EVALUATION DEPARTMENT AS OF 9/28/90
-17-
00 093
w
a:
o
-<
a:
w
a..
J-
C/J
o
"
c
z
:5
...J
o
o
J:
&J
0:0
US~
><
J:
o
II:
~
c..
e
r-w
UJa:
00
0<
a:
w
a..
--NC)CD
"""10 CD 01'
U'11OU).,.....
,..: O~ o. ,,'" CO~
---.....~N
...~* ~
II
-o~,....o
"'V.-MO
,..:.~~1tiN
NNC\I-C
--
ZU'J
-a::
~:s
- -J
a:O
C.c
~
fD 'Ii2" 0 0 CO
o CD co C'? CD
--CO<o..-"'IlT
'4'"' a" v'"' 0'"' N
"lOlONCD
.,. N C\I co ..0
~ ..,. .,. ..". ('r.4'"
4fI!lo
~I
mNCOCCO
,-lOM,.....f,Q
COatOCDV
o. .,: O. N ('04"
U)"I:I"vr--m
v N N ,.... l.O
~ "' ...,. "" ~,.;
M--
~I
..... """" .... .,...
q;iu;itDtD
C\I ('\,I '" N
.. ""'" ..... --
CDCZlOJC,O
CQ Q3I co <0 Q)
all CD CD CD CD
-- ..... -- .....
~I
~
<!J
J:
~f
-I"
0:
~ g~
w e:E
...J:tww
. w t: (!] ...J
::Ew:EO~
wCJUJa:
ujQ<CIlB
lL.a:~>l-
u..-1 wO:
OO~~W
U~-'<~
w><coCC
e
"lIf
;;
"f/I'-
.;
w
"
<
a:
w
>
<
c
w
0
:J
...J
()
~
Jo-
0
Z
<!J
Z
0
Z
<(
aJ ...J
M en
C"') =:J
,.... Q
0 [JJ
0) 0 ~
Q3i a: ~
a: a: 0
LU 0 --
CO u... m Z
~ CI) OJ<
--J
W W NI
C,,) a: NU
W 0 ...JU} 00 094
c < ~~
a: 0
rp 0-_
CJ <u..
-1.3-
e
Community Parks
Cash Proffer
Methodology
Maximum
Gross Cost
General
Credits
Number of Housing Units
Persons per
Household
Acres of Park Land
per 1,000 People
divided by 1,000
times
Land Cost per Acre
plus
Improvements Cost
per Acre
-19-
e
Maximum
Cash Proffer
Maximum
Gross Cost
General Credits
00 .0.95
@mt]
::OSTS:
)~SONS PER HOUSEHOLD
iTANOAADS
ACRESlCAPlT A
SCOSTJACRE
SIMPROVEMENTSlACRE
; GROSS COST
;REDITS:
IElGHTEO AVERAGE ASSESSED VALUE
AVERAGE ASSESSED SINGLE FAMILY
A V~AGE ASSESSED MULTI-FAMILY
,EAL ESTATE TAX RATE
ERCENTAGETO CREO~T
EAL GROWTH RATE
lSCOUNT RATE
IERAGE CASH PROFFER:
mt@!,j
'AIL 22~ 1991
LE.: PAAKCREO.WK1
0.0056
$1 1 ~226
.$'89119
~1&~~@1
$106.006
$1'5.500
$369386
1.09
1.66%
7..00%
7.00%
2.&3
e
YEAR
,
2
3
4
5
6
7
a
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
TOTAL
NPV
e
AMOUNT
19
21
22
24
25
27
29
:31
33
3S
38
40
43
46
50
483
if#t1#~
-20-
00 096
e
~
ACRESOFCOMMUNITYSER~NG
AND SPECJAL PURPOSE PARK LAND
2!IE
ACREAGE
.\PPOMATOX RIVER CANOE LAUNCH
3ENSLEY PARK
3tRO COMPLEX
:OALFlELD SOCCER COMPLEX
:OURTHOUSE COMPLEX
JAVlS COMPLEX
lUTCH GAP BOAT LANDING
=? PING TO N PLANT A no N
TIRICK PARK
TIRICK RfVERsrOE
~=RNBROOK PARK
..J RT STEVEN S
'JATWALTHALL
.QYNE PARK
.~EENAELO ATHLETIC
ARROWGATE PARK
S~RICUS HISTORICAL PARK
UGUENOT PARK
~aNBRIDGE PARK
ATOACA PARK
:ONACAN HIGH COMPLEX
':J [NT OF AOC KS
.=\OVlOENCE COMPLE<
:JBIOUS COMPLEX
jCKWOOO PARK
'COOLAKE COMPLEX
5
13
30
34
4
10
4
44
24
8
e
2
2
33
4
29
32
56
367
43
10
188
16
20
163
j!
1.168
26
JMBER OF SJTES
)PULATION (1990)
211~300
:RES PE1=I1.000 PEOPLE
5.52
toalOUS LANOING NOT lNCLUDEO IN ACREAGE TOTALS-NOT FUNCTIONAL
'RIL 22. 1991
~2 P ARKACRE. WK1
TYPE
SPECIAL PURPOSE
COMMUNITY SERVING
COMMUNITY SERVING
COMMUNITY SERVING
COMMUNlrf SERVING
COMMUNITY SERVING
SPECIAL PURPOSE
SPECIAL PURPOSE
COMMUNITY SERVlNG
SPECIAL PURPOSE
S?EC~AL PURPOSE
SPECIAL PURPOSE
SPEC~AL PURPOSE
COMMUNITY SERV'NG
COMMUNITY SERVING
COMMUNITY SERVING
SPECIAL PURPOSE
COMMUNITY SERVING
COMMUNITY SERV'NG
COMMUNITI SERVING
COMMUNITY SERVING
COMMUNrrf SERVING
COMMUNITY SERVING
COMMUNITY SERVING
COMMUN'TI SERVING
COMMUNITY SERVING
-21-
e
00 097
e
e
~
COST OF COMMUNITY SERVING AND SPEC1Al PURPOSE
PARK IMPROVEMENTS
n'PE OF FAC1UTY
~
!m.!I
INVENTORY
Re'LACEMENT COST
3ASKETBALL $25.000 COURT 20 S500~OOO
:ONCESSION 8UILO~NGS $SO~OOO BUILDING 12 $960.000
.={ESTAOOMS $' sa ~ooo SETS OF 2 19 $2.,850,000
\tA1NTENANCElSTORAG E $200.000 B UILDfN G 13 $2~ 600 .000
.:)fCN Ie SHELTERS $18~OOO SHElTER 19 S342~ 000
.='u.y EaUIPMENT $15.000 PLAYGROUND 13 $195;000
::ANoe LAUNCH $:30.000 LAUNCH 1 .$30,000
~RCHERY RANGE S15,000 RANGE 1 $15.000
30AT RAMP $25.000 RAMP 1 $25.000
=iTN ESS TRAILS $20.000 TRAIL 4 sao.ooo
NTERPRE11VE C ENTER (PO R) $120.000 CENTER 1 $120.000
lATURE CENTER (ROCK) $120.000 CENTER 1 $120~ 000
-ENNIS COURTS $27,000 COURT 70 $1,SgOfOOO
JNUGHTED ATHlETlC FlELOS (1) $75.000 AELD 58 $4.3.50.000
J GHTEO A THLETtC FIElD S (1) $150.000 FIElD 47 $7.050.000
TOTAl $21.127.000
NUMBER OF COMMUNrrf SERVING ANO SPECIAl PURPOSE PARKS 26
AVERAGE COST PER ACRE $B12.5n
TOTAL ACREAGE 1. 1 66
AVERAGE COST PER ACRE $18,119
q ATHLETlC FIELDS ~NCLUOETHOSE USED FOR BASEBALL.
SOCCER. FOOTBALL AND SOFTBALL
PAIL 22. 1991
iJe:P ARKF AC. WK~
-22-
00 098
f-W
cna:
00
tJ 011(
a:
w
a..
e
to-......lO_.~
,...Oall--"'tf'\l')0
~ ItI (I'] CD N M \0
In. en. .,.: cPi N ri CO
-.,.-.-,...-(\1
..,. ~ ... ~
~I lZ) ,.... N . M 0 M W
\0 C'<iiI .,... ,.... Q) (!J
<
a:
w
>
<
~ tn o M ~ (II') M--O
~ o CO) CD -C?I,(J. 0
w :s NN",",=--N\O
(.) N -. N- ~- C" --.. ~~
a: -.l ""'l"QN1.O to 0 CD
0 co - .,. ... .. v ....
a.. c ~ ... .,...:
i ~
w
a:
0
-< il
a: 0 = CO 0 0 -- 0'
o ..,. N 0 OlO 0
W o N ~ CO 0 '" I,Q
a.. o. O~ 'Z:). ...: o. .,.: ..;
t- O 0-""" M 0 CO
(J) U')"~~-"'T'"
0 ~ ... ...,.:
tJ ~
0
z
:i
~
a:
<
Q.
~l ,.... 0 4:1 ~ (Ii)
c ~ ,...: ai
l'-oo a CD 0 0
--
o
w
en
<
J:
a:O
Ujg;
> a...
~j
CD--NMtOOO
,....=cocacaO)~
QI a ~ Q3i a:I aJ CD
- -- ..... ""'" .,...
~
WWa:
t-"Cl<
OOO~
ffia:~6
~~za:
~OO~
:la:cc......
~ _W
z
CJO
:z~
CO
ZO
<<
...J f
>00<
W~CJ
u5Q~
zool-
wOO
1l1a:::E
.
~m~(
j;j
~~:'f.
~:~::'
~:~
tit~
co
Pi
CI)
-
o
OJ
~
a:
w
aJ,
::::;:
w
Q
w
Cl
a:
CJ
-23-
~
:::
~
en
mO
OJ {J
-~
..a:
N <
~Cl.
o:w
Q.,~
<u..
00
098
e
Libraries
Cash Proffer
Methodology
Maximum
Gross Cost
General
Credits
Number of Housing Units
Persons Per
Household
Square Feet of Library
per Person
times
CapitaJ Cost per
Square Foot
plus
Volumes per Person
times
Average Cost per
Volume
plus
Acres of Ubrary Land
per 1, QC() Pea p Ie
divided by 1,000
times
Land Cost per Acre
-24-
e
Maximum
Cash Proffer
Maximum
Gross Cost
minus
General Credits
00 100.
Us"RAl'1fES:
~~
COSTS:
f'ERSONS PER HOUSEHOLD
STANDARDS
30.FT JCAPITA
3UILDING COST/SO.FT-
.1.C RESlCAP1T A
)cOST/ACRE
IOLUMESlCAPIT A
)COSTNOLUME
~ GROSS COST
:RED ITS;
'WGTHED AVERAGE ASSESSED VALUE
'AVERAGE ASSESSED SINGLE FAMILY
"AVERAGE ASSESSED MULTI-FAMILY
~E.AL ESTATE TAX RATE
'e.=tc ENT AG E TO C~EO IT
lEAL GROWTH RATE
IISCOUNT RATE
IERAGE CASH PROFFER
.mll[~I!@
e
2.83
0.28
$108
o ~000096
SSg~950
2.11
$10.50
~~&~i3l65j
$106~006
$115.500
$36.388
1.09
0..25%
7.00%
7~OO%
YEAR
1
2
3
-4
5
6
7
a
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
IUfLDING COSTS DERIVED FROM .MEANS BUILO'NG CONSTRUCTlON COST
ATA. 1991- ANO CENTflAL LIBRARY BID AND INCLUDes ALL FEES AND FURNrSHINGS.
)RIL 22. 1991
~E.; UBCAED.WK1
TOTAL
NPV
-25-
AMOUNT
3
3
3
4
4
4
5
5
5
6
6
6
7
7
!
$77
m~!t~l
e
.
00 101
e
LIBRARY FACILmeS
SQUARE
Ll8RARY FOOTAGE ACREAGE ·
CENTRAL 22.810 7~30
3CN AIR 8 ~OOO 3.51
M 10 LOTHIAN 8 ~50O 2..25
r-A ?RAC E 8,000 1..75
:HESTER 4,500 1.SB
:TTRICK 8.000 3.93
TOTAL 59 ,810 20.32
~ENON (2.0 ACRES) AND WEST BRANCH (4~72 ACRESj NOT
INCLUDED IN ACREAGE TOTALS
~PULAT10N (1990)
211 .300
;CUAAE FEET PER CAPITA
0..28
;APfTAL COST Pen SQUARE FOOT
$108
~CRES OF UBRARY LAND PER 1,000 PEOPLE
o. '0
~CFiES PER CAPITA
0.000096
AND COST PER ACRE
$58.950 ·
'OLUMES AT 12131/S0
446,060
OLUMES PER PERSON
2..11
VERAGE COST PER VOLUME
$10.50
-AND COST DERIVED FROM BON AIR PURCHASE (S42..900/ACRE) AND ENON
'U ACHASe ($75~OOOI ACRE)
~RIL 8. 1991
L.E: USFAC. WK1
.
. .
-26-
00 102
e
Maximum
Gross Cost
Functional
Population
(Demand Units)
Number of
Residents
Number of
Households
times
Square Feet of
Non-Residential
Building
divided by 1,COO
Persons per
Household
times
Employees
per 1,OCO
Square Feet
Fire Stations
Cash Proffer
Methodology
Square Feet of
Fire Station
per Demand Unit
times
Capital Cost per
Square Foot
plus
Acres 01 Fire
Station Land
per Demand Unit
times
Land Cost
per Acre
plus
Equipment Cost
per Demand Unit
-27-
.
General
Credits
Maximum
Cash
Proffer
General Credits
00 103
~I
li'.I~II.llf~riikif,i~J
PERSONS PER HOUSEHOLD
COSTS:
STANDARDS
SO. FT JOEMANO UNIT
CAP!TAl COST PER SQ. Fr.
ACRESIOEMANO UNIT
COST PER ACRE
SeOUIPMENTIOEMANO UNIT
$ GROSS COST
:REDITS:
rNG"TED AVERAGE ASSESSED VALUE
SAVERAGE ASSESSED SINGLE FAMILY
iA VERAGE ASSESSED MUL TI-F AMJL Y
~EAL ESTATE TAX
JERCENTAGETO CREDIT
=:tEAL GROWTH RATE
JISCOUNT RATE.
A~GECASHPAO~
~WS~~m
PRIL 26~ 1991
.LE;FJRECRED. WK1
e
2.83
0.62
$121
O~00018
$35~525
$.27
.r~g~~
$1 06~006
$1 , 5.500
$:J6,386
1.09
0.85%
7.00 %
7.00%
YEAR
1
2
3
4
5
S
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
lS
TOTAL
NPV
-28-
AMOUNT
[ii.f~~~r45
.
$10
11
'1
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
21
22
24
~
$248
00 104
e
.
AAE STATIONS
lBAAND UNITS
JOPU LA TIO N: 2111300
lUMBER OF JOBS IN THE COUNTY (1): 76.963
JUMBER OF EMPLOYED PERSONS
!V1 N G IN THE CO U NTY (2): 103,565
ERCENTAGE OF EMPLOYED PERSONS
.lV1NG IN THE COUNTY WHO ALSO
/0 RK IN THE CO U NTY (:3): 27%
UMBER OF PERSONS WHO 80TH LIVE
AND WORK IN THE COUNTY: 27t963
(1037565 · 27%)
JNCTIONAL DEMAND UNITS: 260~300
.1 1 ,300 + 761973 - 27,963)
) AVERAGE FOA SECOND QUARTER ENDING JUNE 30~ 1990
PROVIDED BY PLANNING DEPARTMENT
) AS OF OECEMB ER :30. 1990 PER VIRGINIA
EMPLOYMENT COMMISSION
) ~NFORMAT10N ON COMMUTING PATTERNS FROM THE '980
CENSUS. SIMILAR iNFORMATION FROM 1990 CENSUS
NOT AVAIlABLE UNTlL 1992
'JRIL 171 1991
LE:AREDEMU.WK1
00 105
-29-
"'II
'~a;~
==
,....'.,
_=-=
.~.
<1-
"t;4
'luij
::.:
~
-.....-....(
e
.
,....to- ,... c:a Nl""'" - .
cnO OC..,....NO N
o a ;:;;;;;; ....
CJ\.L.
....Jw
<a:
~<
a..::J
l~ g
c::
W
.Q.
WW 0 o co 0 = 0 ~~ ,...,....0 co ~
c::" Q) 0,..... c C Q 0 C3 c: caMW1 -- N
<< CD '"" CD M -- l.Q ,.... 00 Q OIl 0 I.Q
:JJ- ,..: o. 00. m. ~~ o. 0< o. ,.: M- o. ~.
gg - ..- "'NfoO N t'1
C ..... ... ... .,. ""
zw
u. jC-
....cn
en a:
OJ
O-J
-'0
~o
~~
"
Q')
)-
'"
o
tJ
-I
<
J-
a:
<
o
~ ~I
<
o
~ il
a:: 0
tij~
> a..
:J
o
"
o
~2~2~~
C) 010 cQ~CJ
fIJ. .. aJ~ aJ. tn. N
...,. -- 0 ... N -
CO-OCNm
.,.--
.... ... ... .,.. ...
W
t!I
<
a::
w
>
<
tnOtOQ),......
t.n It) .... to =- ~
~ co ..... CD 0 co
ft:j ..: .,,; ~: tri ,...-
a CO\Ot,Qo
V1 aJ ,..... I,Q ,....
... ........... .
... ... ""
~~~;ai;
m <D 0 C\I NW
..,.. ....
.... N M CD m CD
ca ca <<I 0::;1 = ca
aJ CD CD (II CD aI
,... -
>
Z
<
a..
:::
o
o
r--. ... CD "I/f'
- In
o
o
c
o.
Ig
~
...
!!
z
o
~
<
1-
ctJ
-<
:E~
t;:s
O...J
00
C
~
J-
U1
o
t.J
C
Z
::s
Q~ CQ
Zo
:So
G)
~
M
<:;
en
a.
--
en
z
a:
::J
1.1..
o
t-
ea
.....
en
o
o
....
z
w
~
a..
5
o
w
a
z
<
(I)
='l
J-
-<
a:
<
a...
a..
-<
..
a:o
~~
>~
o
u
o
~ il
a:
w
aJ
~
W
o
w
o
a:
u
..30-
w
c:J
<
w
a:
o
<
C"'J~"'~"":N"""
NNN... Mui
0",,"0 0
aI ~ r-. ,....
CI:llI .... N c:D
.. fIJ""'~ C"'J-
- ~ ""
..
"" "' .....
53fiig2gfa~
~~:. ~.~=.
zz:~r;z"""
00 ... o~
co Q
o 0 ~
.,....: cae
CDCDONNN
- ---
gJ:~:::~
~~~~~~z
>
z
-<
a..
:::f
o
u
,..... ..". 011 ~ Wl
N
M
w
c:J
<
a:
w
>
<
CD
CD
>
a:
-<
~
a:
aJ
LU
U.
=
C
w
II:
a:
=.l
o
o
o
w
en
<
:J:
o
a:
=:J
a..
t
w
CI)
-<
.,..
Oil:!
a:("J
:J ~
a..
o 0
z <"
< CD
-4
00:
<UJ
o c:I
a:~
(l) 0
:ILU
-< c
we:
a:(J
~
:;:
-a..:
g <
Q
r-.. ~
....JU:
a:tii
Cl.=
<u-
00
1-06
~ 3/
~~
Ct,l
Ct.I
<
?~
I
I
~
:~..
::t"
~~*
Ig~f
:~~
tu
Uk
u..
w
c:
:3
o
r.o
o
o
~
tt:
w
Q..
W
~
...J
~
o
w
C/)
tI) -J
W :(
~ Gj
< c::
III
C'OD
e~~
~I
~ ~ ~
..
~I
~ ~ ~
lit
Ib
...,. ... ..".
N tv C"Il
..
::
~ ~ ~
..
N N N
..
~
~gg
..
..
2
..
o
m ~ !
...
lib ~ &D
...
.....
~~::
...
lID
~ ~ !!
...
16
~~~
...
...
tit
~
.,.
22~
...
c. C. DI-
..
000
g g g
~ ~~-
_..It
w
a:
o
....
Q';l
t::
w
.cD
.::e
:7J
...J
o
~ ~
CD Z
~C:~
ft~~
~ffi~
<00-
::Io~
g ~_c
5~-J
=0<
~=:>
~CI)O
=-
~ ~
= :- I ~
e
e
f~~~=~2:~
e NC"II ~h
~ ~ & ~
~~~~~~~2e!~~!
E ~ a
f'!I ~ r'J fI'J
t") t') C") f"I
C'WNNN
ip',I .,
C'" C'?
al ('Il
~g~~~
.............................
l'III '" at N f'ol C\l C'Il N aI C'III I'll W C\j
~g~g:~
I:V N
C\I iN
c;C;NoNNNNNNCW~;C'f
g ~ g g
~~~~==
:::
g g
o 0 C 0
N C'V ('Il N
g g g
~~~
:::e::::~""
.....::::::::
=::~~~~~~=~CI..e!
::!~:::.:
~~:2~~~==~~IltID..
:::::::::
~e!2~!!~~~~~~~2
~~~~~~~~~~~~~
=
::2~~ee~~~~~2~
= = =
o 0 0 D D 0 0 Q 0 0 . ~ ~
g g g g g g g g g-g 8 g g
ceo 000 0 C 0 coo 0
o. e. o. c. 0" 0 0 0 C o. o. 0" 0
coo 000 0 0 coo 0 0
;;;;;;;;;:;;;;;;;
-1
<
g
UJ
:1
:E
o
(J
..J
<:
tu
c:
..4-
g
.,J..J
< <
.a:ir:
.--t-
CI) O'J
:;:,=>
00
;z w
=~~g~C'
a~~~O;t
~::~;:r5g
~~~~~g
UlW(I')=:J. .w
ffiffi~~~~
oo:::::!::e~
---
~Ii~t
t: * . .
dggg
COooo
000 0
000 0
0..000.
e.~~~
ggg~e
coco:!
...J...J...J...JO
55555
.a:Ja:l!CQ.CD=
~~~~Ul
U:~ii:Li:~ ~
~~OO~e~
~~~~t~S
~~~~~~~
wwwwwu.:>
OOClO:iOcn
=
CI
t,b
;;
w
o
~
~
m
.....
E
w
<<:
o
I.L
o
...
o
S
;,
u
':i.
o
t:t
o
u...
CD
:z.
o
;::
Q..
:f
:)
0)
f1)
<
Q#.~'#
0.$0 0. 0
.moo
-0"':"':
w
~S
~~
l- C)
~g
LtJw
.c... C5
o ~
C:z
o.w
~ffi
C::.a.
w
w......
~~
~....
=z
~5
o u
c:: (J)
o C
.
u;
W
t-
O
2
5
~
....
o
g = ~
Zc.. ~ ~
~it ~
~~ ce ~
88 ~ 5
1oi.U1 ~ U.
~~ w~ 2
<z ~5 ~
5~ 9~ ~
caW Cl..c 0
gtt; ~z t-
~~ ~ffi ffi
c:= Ow....:::
wt-~o:Z-c....
D..:Z~:'t;w5
~w~~ffi~E
wt:i'o ..(!l:o
5~Q~~~~
~ffiE~t~Cl)
~=W<:'Iz~
~:3;:!lEQ~
Om~=~b~
52%582;:
;::~QOm~U)
<o(....zw-w
Eo~~gog
~5~~b~G
~~~~~~~
~c. ...
z
o
o
w
00
<z
CC <
z =(
Q<
I-ti
:5,e:
5C:
~ 0
< "".
Uw
w~
t: 0
::E..J
o c...
c:::E
~~~
...JwW"
~ Co. !:
~tiQ
<w$
> Ll. to-
< W z
b~tf
:z: ::> ::>
~g:::
01( 0 ""
Q ~ ~
00 107
-31- .
e
.
m ~J ~ 0- DIo iCl ~ II) ! .. 0 ::: ~ N .2 ~
CI) C) CO ... ,... N :! ~ ~ tIi
0 ;; C'\I N N tv n C') " ... c till
l::
0
0 ~l :f ID ~ C? ... ~ ... 5 ." rw Do .... 0 t':I ,.... N ~ :! m ....
Z rW ~ t'4i 0 N 0 0 C'i N W cr; e; cW 'P N C\t
< 0 0 0 M:I ...
.. 0 .n
::E 0 (')
w 0 ..,.
c
E: e
....
z 5
~ :5
- - a; e 0
w - ~ t: t: .... :( z
cr t: en ::f <
0 d d c:i 0 w ~ ~
- .- d 0 0 w
tu 0) (iO co CD ED LL. c= E 0 ....
c: 0 0 0 0 w cr Z
w C) 0 0 0 ....
w c QI C 0 -:r. .CI.. w ::.
.... CI), Co c~ o~ o. 0 Z 0 c.. w 0
II w :f St. Q ~ :. 3 0 0 0 c:: z
c: ;l -' ;:;. ~ .... z 0 <
~ i ~ - ~ <
..J 0 ~ 0 C' :S :c:
0 0 ~ a: c:: z z z e: ~ to- cr w
m ~ < t- t- o 0 0 :0 =z 0 II) ~ z W Q
*~~~ < . (3 en- S ...J 0 Co. r::
0 .... en ::. ...J .J ...J -1 W 0
0 co z c: ~ 0 5 ::; :3 5- ....J < c: to" i= ~ w
~ ...J a: ~ w 0 5 0 ~ < '" tL
II < ::f ~ ~ w = G:l CD G:I m r::: c: l- 0 l-
E: w ~ ~ ~ ~ g U) w w w w 0 &.I.. W C') (J En
c: t- W 0 Q. 00
w W 2: < 0 : < :=J r::J 0 u u 0 0 ~ Ll... t- W 0 0 .108
Q.. ... W I- (.\ E ~ Q. tE Q ~ ii: u:: ~ LL en t; .a:. :z 0
-... - < 0 C/) :> z LI. u.. LL u.. e ~ z. '" it :S ......
en ':i w ...J :;; ..J W Ui 0 0 0 0 ... w 0
tv C c:. < < I- 0 < 0 IoL. U tL Z
W 0 ~ ~ c: 0 c: ~ -J ...J ...J ...J C. 0 ~ 0 W W
Z ~ fjj < ~ g -l tr.I UJ -' 0
>- Z c: ..... u.. ~ ~ ~ ~ 0( UI W D.. c: < C') ~ ~
.~~~:~~::: 0 ..J 0 c::: tP) W u Z ::E < .... a...
-oJ < c.. ..J I uJ W :::I ::> W W W w 3 0 ~ ::> ~ w 5
~~~~~~ 0.. -J Q < z z z :z Z c:: ..,. Z % u: CD c: w
~ 5 :> w w ~ < ~ Lv LV w w W 1.l. :J "" 0 u ~ 0
~ 0 :i 0) -32-
w c: m ~ 0 z 0 0 ~ (:) 0 0 0 .:J: 0 m < U) (,) -< w
.
.
TRANSPORfATION CALCUIATIONS
-33-
00 109
.
.
TRANSPORTATION CASH PROFFERS
The average cost of transportation improvements per neW' single
family. dwelling unit is listed in Attachment A. The amount is
based upon the costs to upgrade the existing road network to
accommodate buildout of ~he current land use plans. .
The cost for upgrading existing roads was developed utilizing the
total average' daily traffic, capacities, and construction costs
shown in Attachments A, Band C. Boundaries for individual
improvement sheds are identified in Attachment D. Recommended
shed improvements are identified in Attachment E.
The cost to upgrade roads currently deficient was excluded from
the . improvement cost. The cost for upgrading the powhite
Parkway, Route 2881 Chippenham Parkway, 1-95 and I-295 was also
excluded.
d
.?o.r
5/2/91
"transcp/cash proffers
-34-
00 11:0
I~~i~_:~
.
.
,c(
f-of
Z c.J ~i .,.. ~
~ ~ 0\ t""I
~ t-' H I&.. f""I N
:c ~ z ~~
u ...., N N
..:: UJ ~ U> 0
E-t
~
-::
E-4 \0 II)
..... 0'\ III
C ~ &.n
~ .-( N
C) U)- IJ)
>t
~
t-t
~~ 0 C\
~ ~ 0'\ D:)
Ir... CO ,....
.tI:I 0 ...
~ " I"") ~
O~ U). U)o
2;
M
to to
Eooot
UJ ~
0
tJ
:c C It) 0
U) ~ \0 an
-=: :I: ,.., ~
CJ UJ CI)- C/)o
Z
0
.....
~
~
0 t") 'l>
~ ....... r--
en ~ ,.,., ......
~~ a. ",
~ M
M 1""'1
f-.t
0 f'9l N
f-t
to 0 0
E-t U'l Ul
Z r-- f'
p,.. ~
0 ,..... .-;t
~ t-t 0
8> CD ~
[IJ 0
Oc:: ,.., a-
U 0.. N an
N 0'\
....
..-4
CJ) V).
:c :r: ~
~I fool E-c ~
0::- 0 (J)
0 0 U
% U) f-ol
00 111
-35-
to
+J
t:
QJ
E
..c
o
I'd
..&.J
~
<
.
.
a
~
>r 8
~ U
::>
~ c::
E--ICCQ
0 QCI)tz:ltil~
~ ~ZCQC
en OOHHH
~ ~ a:tJ>>>
t:JHHH
~ ClD:;CCC ~~r.l
H :z; j~~
0 H~t=Qlit~
tI) E-ijZZZ
= ~ j~j
0 ~\Cct)
~ X
IiJN~\POJ
~
>l ~ 0000 00
~ oooo~ 000::
~CJ ~ oooct:J tJJ OO~
-- .. -. ..> ~ -.. .... >
G Q COtnl..OCOO CDf'O
~ 8 f"""iNM ~ 1C')CX)
~~ I I I I I e I I J
~ ~ O,....{~P'""I.-( o f'"""C M
0.0 0 0 00
0000 00
~ .. .. " "" -.
~ COLOtOCD cor--
~NM 1t')CX)
N
M
.......... ~
e m
-r"l -.........
14 0
M
,....-t ...........
o ~
> 0
~
+J ·
01 >
Q) aJ
J..4 p:;
-36-
00 112
.
U
.LJ
C
OJ
=
J::
0
ro
+I
+J
<
Q)
,...;
Q) ....., Q} OJ CD
f""'1 IS .--t .-( r""'(
.....; "- ..,; .....c ......c
E C IS E E
" 0 ~ ........... ..........
t: ....-( t:: I: ::
0 ...-i 0 0 0
--f"i ,.....c ....-( ....; .....,
,...., ....., ,..; ~ ~
,..; S ,...( ,....J ...-4
-,., ~ ..,..., ~
E to ~ e e;
t1)
E-4 N C"'1 en ~ co
U) U; (/)- <n- it)- <J>
0
CJ
Z
0
H
E-ot
CJ
::>
~ 'C
E-t ro
tJ) 0
Z ~
0 U) tI1 >,
U Q) OJ OJ ra
c .c c ~
C to as ItJ OJ
< ,..-( ...-I ,..., QJ
0 I J,..(
a; N ~ \0 ~
~ tn 0 0 Q.l Q)
,cC .c +J +J C .c:
CJ -f-[ ru It!
H +' 'tS "d ..-I P"""I
c.. UJ rc to J I
~ ....; 0 0 ~ 'IIIQ"
&1 >< '-' .L.I
(1J ~ ):
OJ Q) Q) m
~ C C C C
0 lU ca
:5 ,....; r-i +J ...,
~ J I 0 0
~ N CIft ::3 ::1
Ul J..i J-l
C C C ~ +J
0 Q) OJ UJ UJ
0 'C "0 C C
Q) .....t -...; 0 0
tl: ~ ~ U (J
-37-
.
M
0'\
...........
o
M
ri "'"
M~
'-0
m
t'- ·
o >
r-ofQJ
0'\0:;'
00 113
o
....
z
w
~
:z:
u
~
f-
.e:::
'" f~ '.I r --''\_
I~' } ....
t~:-.~. / rt
\Z;::'~-~1':~~.<"c. ~. ~ \.
A +.' ~'\'. ~ ... tt--_ ~
, . -.'rr
j" =--..J.T~~_JI
I ,~
~ ~ Sb' ~ i~. \.,
· .~ i:~ ,,-:.Yll~~/ ;. \. "---:"'''!;,--:,.,
= . (,,~ ~ ~f('.;" .. ..\::.7---\\-..,
- ~r.:. ~ ) "'I~ V -...... ...---
~ ("~~~/~~~~~'~~~....,.~ -r.tj~~~~
\ . \~'.:\ r.d' ~ :,V't: ~ 7~~ ,,' ~ .J \.
~--l ,A ~i;~~!o~ ~ ~~.;:~~tr;AI ~~" "~ ;Y~~" ~~~;
. -' ~-~, ~ ~ 7.... ri; ~ I ...~~ ~ ~..,;,.,A,f2' ~. +. \
-'" ~4 ""'"""=---- r&"-J'\L k.:." JP-i w""I~i:/ Ii~ ------ ~-~ , tp:. l'f'o _
-..:f.~:'...1L ~ -.: - ~::"I' ....! ~'!'" ~ - ~ (T ' ~
~ . L... t t1 'L,i ,= \. ". . ~~ LA' ~~.- \
~ ft. a ~~ ,-T;.!1i l-rl"..... ., C ~.t.: ~'Q .\ " . -- 0#'& ..;r:......
/:~~I \.tl,.. .~, ~. ~;::~~.. '", _... -.. ~-J
/~_.~~"C l ';3 ~ ~ 'nI'" '-:: t":I ~<!:J J ~ L""'( ~ / J. .~. ..: rt- J
~ ~ .W ~ a..",,", i"~.~"1ti;1 ~.~ -k::.; " ... ,,/ _~R'
..~.,.~ , .,. . I , 7- '..~.' t~'l --..D11 ri
~~ ..... v 6l.:!:!.",---~ ~~ ~, . :J.... d;._.~' .'..... ~=...~
~ II,. lID' ., J J. ~ ;r "~ ~ I ~ ('"~.. · . _ ..li. Ifl1
~ l t"~ ~ fi;F ~ . - Q . f . ~ '. . · .. · . _ \. ... ~~., _ .' j \ L.- - ~ 1
~~tr;(!::'" "~ . ' / 1, -': , ..:),. 'i; ~. -7 ~ ....' ~~-\
~ ' ..-....a.. 1; #" ". ... :./ -~ ~ - ~...~J=7-'
~ ~ ~ -,.. ~.-~. I .:A; '.S"7mt/~ I ) I .... - ---, ~~~ ~ \
'\'1 .-.r 1 ~~ IIY"\ iI~~/ . ~ ~r.. . \ ".... .. ~-_
- ,t)~" ~ .....r 7'\ ~~~:IJ W1 --. ~ '.i~..... -~ ( ... -..,......:... ;.... ~
1- .......n" , ~ Lr\Ij ~1 ~ 117 ~ ~ ". " ..,.oj '. ' .
, ~::\..\M Kr- ~-.~.., ~ -- . 1'. .; ~ ~ ~"'..' .. ..' .' ~ j... ~ ......1
~...-ft.op .~ t.~ :-.~ ~ ~. ~ "'- . ~. .. ." .. i~ .. ,_. ~
~+' ~ · ~~l__-" _~ 'Y ~. / J...... .~: ; . '" 1.,.. ........ tOI .. 1 ~. S
i:J,-.,. ~~I -- .~... , ~~ .... - C'. J." - r ~
'Ri~.:. ~..:ti; ~.TJ: ~~,'~~. ~ ,~ i ~ : ~--). !.\ I...~. \. ~ j
\ ~ ~ -:: _~~\ ~ ~ "_ . ~ .. (~~ I ... ~l .. (-.
l~- 1. "ij"..:fll~" 'r".... ./.. ';~ ~~- -.' . ~ 0 - I"'~~ ,- ~ - .;,....'
-'. J~~P~ ~ ~(~ j -'n~l~~~ n.~. 0; t ' ~ ,"" \,'" ;'~.l ~. ~ if
~ (1;'..r;( W ........... \.' 1< . ,.......'..T.tj:.. . - .., Ito"liiil:::: '., ..... . .'
. ...' ~ ~ \Y\f "",,"",~l :I: p - 1~~~."'.~ ..+:.. .. .~.. I-JJ \ . "'. ~ /r-
... ~~jJ)f~""" ~ t-- L- ~_: ~ ~ 'If ~~ ~ ~~. . !\.... I I ...::.. _--:;,. ;;;-..,~t.
.~-,:.~tr~~~~.jIE ~ ~~1~ l...:~~ ~,:~: ,-:-;r..', ~(:!t/--_. r .1, ~ ~
-"- ~~;a~~t\~l~ Z".' -~~. '3r::: ~. - . ~l
._. ).)~.,;;;; . " ~ ..: ~ --I . F -;- or ~~ ~...A:.-" J. ../ ~. ..~. ..'\
., ~ l{~. J. Jrsr- ~ · Joe ; :.~. . .- f'~' '-. _ t"'l ~l.>:'"p
I ~ ~~j~.. ,I - ~. _;~ ~ljj ~. ~...~" ";'~~,.; .. / ) /" '\.' _.r ~.~ . ...
-.-.t:'''.~)'Df:- . t. C ,... ~< \T" ~ .. J ~ : ""'",_ .;" / ...... ,,,lo'.V
~-I' , ~ r. --,",:-.~~ ~-". ....,. .... ~
\ ~ " .. ~"....I ~ ~, /'~ ~ ~. "-:: -:..l-l \.. ) ... i _.j t~.l
\' . J' ~.,:: 7 .. I '~t · \. ~: ~ ~ \ .... ... ...................
.. " , ~\ Y ~ · ~ if. :....,.-......::' .~ ~ J '\ - _' -w '
'. ,"~'!~', ~ ~ - ~~f', · · .;~)
, . I \ .' \ ,- ~ ~
f 'i. · J ' r~: \ . "'::.- ,-. -' ( 7:..\1~
rH ,,' --.. '''';'. .. ~/. '~": ~---;~.."~ /....... .;;;;-- ~- ...
f!1 ~ ,'" .. '. "--""
.. " \ .. .. ~ ~ '."-'-
f ''''"-.- _. W ." "."~. ~.
11 ',.... ./\ \ ~ ' ~~~
,. 11 - \ \ .,' ::-'':-1 -..
I E l J 1 \ \i ~~.
I! i ! \ ,....~.~.. '''-,
rId J \ \" ...") ~/
1111 U II. i /l _ . I ,
_ i t
~ ~ - I
-b2 .f.
! i i ~ i
~ .1.1-4
3= i i!ll
; ~nu~
.
.
>-
I-
~
~~ f lK~i
:>-
c::
<:
o
Z
'.::J
o
m
c
z
::>
o
u
C
...J
W
-
u..
c:
W
I-
.00
W
:I:
U
w
"
cd:
LL.
J:
G
::::>
o
a::
o
:I:
t-
z
~
..J
c..
Q
W
~-t
00
-38-
I
<I
I
I
t
.
I
I
.
I .
f
.
r
11
.
IJJ
I-
Z
W UJ en
::: IJJ L&J C/)
.."". Z Z LtJ
c:; < ct Z
<t ..J -=:
l- -J -J
~ V (D :z. -----
m
- I
- I
.
-
. I
-
.
- I
.
,
'-
00 11,5.
0>
........
en.
N
......... ..
-39-
>-
,
....-
1
Z III
::> 0::
0 c:t
U u..
....-:
t
CI -
C5 Z
..J
W. ::> c::t
- 0 ..J
u..
e:: c::: 0..
!.U .0
r- .,..
en -
r-
UJ
...... '
J
---
() '.
.
~.... .
t< ~::~.~, ~ . ~
. \~ t ~ ........
~.-".' .............:..~.............
, . ~~
f .\ ';
..-- I~. \
{ '. '.. . - I
\-,--..~~ I ,
-.....,: '.----./
. . ......, ! .::- .;~;,;.
fl
[I
il
il
~!
r ~
!j
I J
r'
~f
t'
,
f
i::.
_l-
B ; ~
E 5 ~
: ~ :-......: ~..... J !
f _...,...... . .
!,~€'_:.. ;Jf
I'.. ~,~;/! ~
~r
~
>-
0:
<t
)-0
zZ
Lr.J~
::0
wa:l
>
00
t:t:UJ
a...:J:
:;Ecn
-1:-- !.
.
I
-
-
-
-
-
~..
('S
\
00 116
..--it
.... ,~
..- :t
,..
--
r.t
11 6 ·
.
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVI SORS
AGENDA
MEETING DATE; January 22, 1992
SUBJECT;
AP PO INTME~lTS
ITEM NUMBER;
4.B.
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR' 5 COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
Attached is a list of appointments deferred from the
Board meeting on January 8, ~992.
PREPARED BY~
ATTACHMENTS: YES 0 NO []
~9891
SIGNAT URE ;
C~INISTRATOR
00 117
.
.
~~ CAPITAL AREA TRAINING CONSORTIUM
r-,
One at-large appointment from County with term until
December 31, 1994
SHOULD BE DECEMBER 31, 1992 - CONSORTIUM AGREEMENT OF 7
LOCALITIES CALLS FOR BOARD MEMBER
COMMITTEE ON THE FUTURE
One from Clover Hill with term at Pleasure of the Board
COMMUNITY SERVICES BOARD
still checking on le~~ty of Mrs. Brenda Johnson's one year
appointment v "
RAYMONT FOUNDATION
One from County at-large with term expiring December 31,
1992
111.0. PlI/I'L ~~
PERSONNEL APPFALS BOARD
One from County at-large with term expiring December 31, 1994
V(W<. I.J.~
SOLID WASTE COMMITTEE
Two from Midlothian with term expiring December 31, 1992
One from Clover Hill with term expiring December 31, 1992
TRANSPORTATION SAFETY
One from County at-large - Pleasure of the Board
AIRPORT ADVISORY BOARD
One-from Midlothian with term expiring February 14, 1992
\.
'\.
00 118
-1-
. e.
.
t,
-:..~ KEEP CHESTERFIELD CLEAN CORPORATION
.~ One from Midlothian with term expiring January 31, 1993
COMMISSION ON SOIfrUNDATIONS
Need to appoint Bob Olsen, Midlothian
Need to appoint Rick Phelps, Clover Hill
Need to appoint Robert Karnes, Matoaca iIY'I/J f-
One from Dale - ~ ~aXL (cJrJlt) {tuJ5L-J t r..)'trt
One from Bermuda - t,)4Y'"1. w~ (~ ~
Others as determined~1 Board
Terms - undetermined
Mr. Daniel plans to nominate Mr. Russell Mait representing
the Dale District. (Resume ,attached)
METROPOLITAN ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL OPERATING COMMITTEE
JAMES COX - TERM EXPIRES FEBRUARY 5, 1992 and he does not
wish to be reappointed.
One from County-at-large ~
Two year term for appointment C1~
Mr. James Spencer has contacted the County Administrator and
expressed a desire to be considered for this appointment.
{
APPEALS PANHEL PURSUANT TO VIRGINIA SET OFF DEBT COLLECTION ACT
JAMES E. HARRIS - PLEASURE OF BOARD
~y LOU LYLE, DIRECTOR OF ACCOUNTING - PLEASURE OF BOARD
SAMUEL H. WEST - PLEASURE OF BOARD
v
RICHARD
CORDLE, TREASURER - PLEASURE OF BOARD
V ~~tA-d~
trw1
00 119
-2-
...... \.
. e,
.'
t1
I
RUSSELL B. MAlT
'\
EDUCATION:
BS - Chemical Engineer, University of Virginia, 1978.
Masters of Business Administration, University of Richmond, 1983.
SOCIETIES:
American Institute of Chemical Engineers
Air and Waste Management Association
Alpha Chi Sigma
SUMMARY OF EXPERIENCE:
Mr. Mait has twelve years of hands-on experience in developing and
directing environmental programs for industrial facilities in the
chemjcal and aluminum industries. Experience and responsibilities have
included: regulatory compliance in areas of air, water, and waste;
negotiating and securing permits and compliance orders; analyzing,
commenting, and testifying on proposed legislation and regulation;
management and design of capital projects; operation of industrial
wastewater treatment facilities, solid waste disposal facilities,
hazardous waste storage and neutralization facilities, and nonhazardous
1 andfi 11 s.
He has additional experience in process development and improvement for
the chemical and tobacco industries, in the fields of separation and
drying technologies.
DETAILED EXPERIENCE:
1992 - Present
Malcolm Pirnie, Inc.
Senior Project Engineer:
Industrial services development, with focus on waste minimization and
pollution prevention. The objective is to offer clients the opportunity
to achieve pollution prevention with the combined benefits of
productivity improvement, return on investment, and the minimization of
risks and liabilities. Projects involve hazardous waste, wastewater, and
air emissions.
1989 - 1992
Reynolds Metals Company
Manager, Solid and Hazardous Wastes, Corporate Environmental Control
Department:
Directly responsible for coordination and development of the company's
solid and hazardous waste program for all Reynolds locations.
Accountabilities included: development of corporate guidance, policy,
and training programs, commenting on proposed legislation and
regulation; conducting compliance reviews of company and vendor
facilities; negotiating and securing permits, del;stings, regulatory
exclusions, .compliance orders; directed site assessments, remediations,
and closures.
00 ..120
t.~i..
. ."
.
~J..
;,
.
)
1980 - 1989
Hercules Incorporated
Environmental Coordinator, Hopewell Plant: 1982 - 1989
Responsible for all plant environmental operations, programs, and
projects, and served as the primary plant contact with Federal, State,
and Local regulatory agencies. Supervised an environmental staff of 17
environmental engineers and state certified operators and laboratory
technicians. Specific responsibilities included: operation of a
biological wastewater treatment facility and solid waste disposal
facilities, compliance monitoring programs for a NPDES permit/ Tox;c
Management Programt Pretreatment permit, plant air emission permits,
RCRA groundwater requirements, and UST integrity testing; overall
project responsibility for plant capital environmental projects, RCRA
Part A and B permitting, RCRA Oelisting, RCRA TSO closures, RCRA
Corrective Action, and UST closures.
Environmental Engineer, Hopewell Plant: 1980 - 1982
Responsible for plant industrial hygiene activities,noise abatement
program, and TSCA compliance. Prepared environmental permits, and
environmental monitoring and annual reports. Developed and implemented
new programs to comply with new regulations.
Process Engineer, Hopewell Plant: 1980 - 1980
Managed projects in the areas of product quality, energy savings, yield
improvement, equipment testing, new product development.
1978 - 1980
Philip Morris Incorporated
Project Engineer, Philip Morris Research Center:
Directed projects in the development of new tobacco processes for
industrial application. Projects involved laboratory development, pilot
plant testing, optimization and scale up.
AWARDS:
Hercules Incorporated Performance Award, 1985.
u. S. PATENTS:
"Recovery of tobacco From Stemmery Discards",
No. 4,340,142, July 20, 1982.
IIDielectric Heating of Tobacco Bales", - in print 1980.
PUBLICATIONS AND PRESENTATIONS:
Mait, Russell, Bt 1987, "Hazardous Waste Regulationsll, Presentation to
Department of Justice, Bureau of Prisons, Petersburg, VA.
00 .121
-"I
. ..
.
.. ~
'~~
:i
Mait, Russell B., Hoskins, Lor; J, 1991, lIRCRA Annual Hazardous Waste
Training Manuall1, manual produced for Reynolds Metals Company, Richmond,
VA.
Mait, Russell B., Hoskins, Lor; J, 1991, uRCRA Annual Hazardous Waste
Training Videoll, video produced for the Reynolds Metals Company,
Richmond, VA.
Mait, Russell B., 1991, UReauthorization of ReRA - A New Challenge", a
presentation to management and staff of the Reynolds Metals Company.
Mait, Russell B., 1992 II Used Oil Regulation Summary and Impact Report",
internal report for the Reynolds Metals Company, Richmond, VA.
PROFESSIONAL COMMITTEES:
Solid Waste Task Force,Environmental Affairs Committee, Aluminum
Association, 1991.
Environmental Affairs Committee, Virginia Manufacturers Association,
1986-1989.
Technical Advisory Committee, Hopewell Regional Wastewater Treatment
Facility, Hopewell, VA., 1982-1989.
Editorial Advisory Board, "Environmental Management Report", Government
Institutes, Inc. Washington, D,C., 1987.
OFFICE:
Malcolm Pirnie, Inc
11832 Rock Landing Drive
Suite 400
Newport News, VA 23606
804-873-8700
804-873-8723 (fax)
HOME:
8402 Copperpenny Terrace
Chesterfield, VA 23832
804-276-0253
00 122
e
e
BOARD OF SUPERVtSORS
HARRY G. DANIE~ CHAIRMAN
DALE DtSTRICT
ARTHUR S. WARREN. VICE CHAIRMAN
CLOVER H1Ll OJSTRrCT
J. L Me HALE, III
BE AMUOA OlsmlCT
WHALEY M. COLBERT
MA TOACA OISTRrCT
EDWARD B. BARBER
MIDLQTHJAN DISTRICT
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
P.o. Box 40
CHESTERFIELD, VIRGINIA 23832-0040
LANE B. RAMSEY
COUNTY A OM I N ISTRA TOR
MEMORANDUM:
TO:
The Honorable Member of the Board of Supervisors
Thomas E. Jacobson, Director of Planning~C'~
January 22, .1992
FROM:
DATE:
RE: Appointment.to Richmond Regional Planning District Commission
~ the.ir January 21,. 1992 meeting the Planning Commission recommended the
(' ~~ard of Supervisors' appoint Phillip G. Cunningham to the Richmond Regional
Planning District Commission for a two year term.
cc: Richard F. Sale,'.Deputy County Administrator for Community Development
,
~}
. 'It
~.
t.
e
5~ It ~
CHESTERFI ELD)~~':: COUNTY
'. ~
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
REPORTS
MEETING DATE: January 22 I 1992
REPORT ON:
I ~
'5 . A.
status of General Fund Balance, Reserve for Future
Cap i tal proj ects I D i st;- ict _~o~d and streE?~_. Li_g!l~ _
. Funds, Lease Purchases:
ATTACI~MENTS: YES _ NO D
SIGNATURE:
~ Ifi~i~.;.,. I
. ."if..) 1: ' .
~ ~ ~\ r
. ..
. -...... ~ I . .___ ...-... ......
.;
"';
r/4f
COUNTY ADM I N I STRATOR
. . :,,::,. )'~:;.: ~ . '.
00 123
f/Il "1
e
e
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
GENERAL FUND BALANCE
January 15, 1992
Board
Meeting
Date Description Amount Balance
07/01/91 FY92 Beginning Fund
Balance $15,426,215
08/28/91 Loan to Midlothian Vol-
unteer Fire Dept. for
building addition ( 45,000) 15,381,215
10/23/91 Appropriated funds for
temporary position in
Planning Dept. for
Riverfront Plan research
contingent upon $150,000
to $250,000 match from
private sector 50,000) 15,331,215
12/11/91 Approriated funds for FY92
lease agreement for Coal-
field Soccer Complex 13,000) 15,318,215
gfbal
00 124
Board
Meeting
Date
11/22/89
12/13/89
06/30/90
06/13/90
06/27/90
06/27/90
12/12/90
06/30/91
03/13/91
07/01/91
e
It
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
RESERVE FOR FUTURE CAPITAL PROJECTS
TRADITIONALLY FUNDED BY DEBT
January 15, 1992
Description
Amount
FY89 Excess revenue
$2,119,900
FY90 Budgeted addition
1,881,500
Designation from June 30,
1989 Fund Balance
1,500,000
Purchase of land-Cogbill Road
630,000)
Purchase building at 6701
West Krause Road
400,000)
Budgeted addition of excess
revenue
2,100,000
Purchase medical building for
future library site
735,000)
Funds to purchase land for
park on Lake Chesdin
C 600,000)
Budgeted but not appropriated
funds to purchase land for
school and park sites (2,000,000)
Fill dirt for cover repair
at Fort Darling Landfill 180,000)
Budgeted addition from FY91
revenues 4,000,000
Designated but not appropriated
funds to cover construction
contract for MH/MR/SA building
if bonds are not sold in
fall, 1991 (1,806,800)
Regional Jail Authority as
approved in the FY92 Adopted
Budget (which will be reim-
bursed) (1,000,000)
Balance
$2,119,900
4,001,400
5,501,400
4,871,400
4,471,400
6,571,400
5,836,400
5,236,400
3,236,400
3,056,400
7,056,400
5,249,600
4,249,600
00 125
.'\
."
e
e
08/28/91 Provide funding for improve-
ments at Northern Area Landfill
to allow reallocation of
General Fund dollars to
recycling programs 315,000) 3,934,600
08/28/91 Additional funding for
Bon Air Library expansion 275,500) 3,659,100
08/28/91 Add back MH/MR building
funds which were previously
deducted for construction 1,806,800 5,465,900
11/27/91 Appropriated funds for T.V.
arraignment equipment but
holding in reserve account
until prices and all costs
are confirmed 115,000) 5,350,900
rfcip
00 126
. e
Q) 0 t-I \.C CO N 0
Ul t> Lt1 N M M rl 0
c: 0 ~ M N l" t.n
+J res ...
r-I M t-f M rl M M
..c: I'd r-I M M M M M
j:Q
bl
....-I 0 C'\ ~ N 00 0
[J) if) ~ CO \.0 00
~ roro -.::::r 0 H N r-.....
~ OJ
::1 Ul N N N N 1""""1
tLr:::>
+J
Q) ~
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ul (1) .r-I 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 +J Lfl Ln Ll") U1 Lfl Lf)
Z ~ Nm ... ..
::> C'\ "r-f M M M M M M
rx.. +J >t""" 1""""1 M r-i 1""""1 1""""1 M
JZ..~
8 Ul 0
:I::N ~
c.!JC'\ P-E
H C'\ 0..
HM F:(
8 "
~-.::r
Mr-i
p::; (]) M 00 N m 0 r::t:
8:>t 0 M qt ............
U)~ c: 0 \.0 Z
nj (J) ct1 ... ...
0:::1 r-i \0 M
ZC:: "d ('(j N
~cd CO
t'J s::
~
r::t: :j 0 0 0 0 N ,c:C
0 Vl L.[) 0 L.{') 0 N ...........
0:: tL. '0'0 r-I rl 1...0 M N Z
s:: Q.l
8 ::j [I) M \.0 M Ln CJ'\
U ~:::> N ~ .--I Ln M
H "d
0::
8 rd c:
UJ 0 0 0 0 0 0
H 0 ..M 0 0 0 0 0
0 +J \0 \0 \D \0 \D
~ n:1
N -.-I Ln ll'l U1 L.t'1 Ln
CT\)....I M M r-l M M .ex:
+J >-0.. ............
Ji.lO Z
c: ~
P..
Q.) P...
<
U
+:
M co N m N
[I} )..I LO M m 0 N
Q) ).-f CU U1 Ln \..D L1) ~
cO :>
OJ wo l/) \.0 m en M ,c:C
~1 M r-I M N ............
~ ~ Z
~ ~
,.c: o ~
.. r-I (1j
E-i ~u
p..
,....; (])
r-i c: "0
..r-t rd ...-t
+J ::r: "r-I ~
0 <<j m ;::
.r-I ro H U 4J ~
H =' OJ tlS 0 +.J
+J S :> Cl) 0 .....-i C
U] ~ 0 rl +' ra ::1
-,-i (IJ r-f ctf ctS .rl 0
Q ,:Q U ~ ~ ~ ()
00 127
1".'
!~
~
-... .. 1.
Date
Lease
Purchase.
Began
12/83
7/87
7/87
....,:...,.... ~:.J'I ......,:":I'i.I' ~
10/87
6/88
J-;\.
e
:. ;
e
- ;
.P:repared by.."
'. ." "Accounting Department
". " .December- 31, 1991
, "
./. rI' ~ .
-. .I' ... oj ~ ...~- ."
- t ""~~L-:-:. .
, . . ~~~~ ~~f.;; ~~!~ ~
~ ~ _' :J, '\ ,-
~ I .. ~ ..11r-:
SCHEDULE OF CAPITALIZED-LEASE PURCHASES
, "
Descrintion
.-... ~ .
" -
APPROVED AND EXECUTED
Copie~s
School Vehicles
School Telecommunications
Equipment
Jail-Addition
Data Processing
Human Services
Courts Building
800 MHz Equip~ -
Rescue Squads .
800 MHz Equip. -
Sheriff
Fire Pumpers
Fire ~tation Apparatus,
'and Furnishings ~ _
A T & T. Phone Equip.
Filing System- '
Treasurer
(Unallocated)
~'.
'.-
Original
. Lease
Purchase
Amount
Da te .
Lease
Purchase
Ends
Outstanding
Balance
12/31/91
$ 30.500 8/92 $' 5,084
259 I 500 .- 6/92 25,363
239,046 7/92 32~977
245,385 12/01 191,836
1,839,219 1,437,848
4,489,377 3,509,668
16.796~O19 13 ~ 130'. 648
23,370,000 18,270,000
- "85,000
140,000
264,000
" ' 1,428 ,000
9.46 I 400
40,000
83~6do
2,987,000
6/93
28,408
46 ,572
88,015
248,640
305,486
9,014
o
726,135
_/:;
r
00 128
Da te ' . ~
. . Lease - .,
-.. - _ Purchase
': Began'
10/88
12/88
3/89
8/89
12/89
10/90
--
.
,;. ~ ".~.Jr I. v
~ ~..:::.$rl:r t.~;}~ ::." .'P..-
\--.-:\;~~~,~~:;':- '
. .
: - Descrip'tio~s .
School Copier
A~rport State Police
.Hangar Additions
and, County Warehouse
Geographic Inform~tion
. System. ("GIS ") ..;~~~
. Automated Mapping
System
Data ~rocessing'Equipment
Data Processing Equipment
Mental Healtht Mental
Retardation and
Substance Abuse
Computer Equipment
TOTAL APPROVED
AND EXECUTED
,.
- . ~
- Original. ;, _ . Dat~. .
.. '. - Lease '. . ~ase-'.
. I:' Purchase , .." . Purchase
.. . Amount ; _ Ends
$ .' . 21, 600
128,800
331~200
460,000
3,095,000
183 ,43'0
2,015,570
96.500
$32,758,146
None
PENDING APPROVAL AND/OR EXECUTION
a:caplease.doc~11
"-.,
',-
~i
-/..
- .9/93
12/00
1/98
8/92
1/95
7/93
t ;:';.::.. r ~ ~I
-'Outstand'ing :;.~;~~~i:-
Balance. '.... ~':~:'.'~~:\~'
12/31/91 .' .' .
$'
9,148
110.397
283..877
394,274
3.095,000
33 f 552'
1,264,222
65.500
.$23 , 921', 255
00 129
s ~.
~ ~.
.. ',. . ............
.
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
REPORTS
January 22, 1992
MEETING DATE:
5.B.
REPORT ON: Roads Accepted into the state secondary System
ATTACHMENTS: YES ~ NO 0
SIGNATURE:
+ .!~~S\; _
+ .
'II ;;.
t :~;;'
".,.
.
t;'
~
COUNTY ADMI NISTRATOR
~. ~:~:V.rl' . . . .
00 130~.
..;;, ~_.
.'
.
COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINIA
RAY D. PETHTEL
COMMISSIONER
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
1401 EAST BROAD STREET
RICHMOND, 23219
January 9, 1992
Secondary System
Additions
Chesterfield County
Board of Supervisors .
County of Chesterfield
P. O. Box 40
Chesterfield, VA 23832
MEMBERS OF THE BOARD:
As requested in your resolution dated December 13, 1989, the
following additions to the Secondary System of Chesterfield County
are hereby approved, effective December 23, 1991.
ADDITIONS
LENGTH
DEERWQOD. SECTION C
Route 3000 (Buckhorn Road) - From Route 3001 to 0.44
mile South Route 3001
0.44 Mi
Route 3746 (Trophy Lane) - From Route 3000 to 0.07
mile East Route 3000
0.07 Mi
Route 3747 (Trailbrook Drive) - From Route 3000 to 0.24
mile Southwest Route 3000 0.24 Mi
Sincerely,
t ;fJ. {J-UflrL
~ D. Pethtel
Commissioner
00 131
TRANSPORTATlQN FOR THE 21 ST CENTURY
-. r
.
31C.
~
MEETING DATE:
January 22, 1992
s.c.
.,
i
r
I
l
l
\
l
J
,
i
~
r
I
f
j
~
~
t
,
!
~
of
}'
i
~
CHESTERFI ELD.#~;' COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
REPORTS
REPORT ON:
Report of Water and Sewer Contracts by Developers
BACKGROUND:
The Board of Supervisors has authorized the County Administrator to
execute \\Tater and/or sewer contracts bet",,'"een the County and the
Developer in which no County funds are involved.
The rep~rt i.s submi tted to the Board members so they \\rill be aware
of deve lopmen t s uti 1 i zing pub 1 ic "'fa ter and / or se\\rer \\Ti thin the ir
districts.
The following utility
Administrator:
contract was executed by
the
County
'.
i
!
~
i
i
!
I
J
I
I
I
I
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
..,
1. Contract Number:
Project Name:
Developer:
Contractor:
Contract Amount:
District:
89-0367
Meado~brook ~arms, Section D
RO\\Te Associa.tes, Ltd. .
J. S~even Chafin, Inc.
Water - $26,577.50
Sewer - $37,347.44
. Dale
.
'.;"
PREPARED BY:
/ j . E. Beck
~sistant Di ctor
of Utilities
ATTACHMENTS; YES 0
NO .
SIGNATURE:
COU~IN1STRATOR
00 132
"j J. IJ ~
..
. .
CH~STERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVI SORS
AGENDA
.
MEETING DATE: January' 22 II 1992
ITEM NUMBER:
12 . A.
SUBJECT:
Resolution Recognizing Herbert M. Shelton Upon His
Retirement
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION;
WHEREAS, Herbert M. Shelton retired from the Chesterfield
County Police Department on January 1, 1992; and
WHEREAS, Herbert M. Shelton has provided 31 years of quality
service to the citizens of Chesterfield County; and
WHEREAS, Herbert M. Shelton has served the County in the
capacity of Patrol Officer, Detective, Sergeant, and Lieutenant;
and
WHEREAS, Herbert M. Shelton has, for the last several years,
overseen the investigation of many major crimes, including homicides;
and
WHEREAS, Herbert M. Shelton has significantly impacted the safety
of the community by arresting or causing the arrest of major criminals
during his long tenure as a Supervisor and Commander in the Crimes
Against Persons Unit within the Police Department; and
ATTACHMENTS: YES_
NO C
~~
PREPARED avK J
Frederick W. llis, Jr.
Director, Human Resource
Management
.... .
SIGNATURE:
'~
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
00 133
,/ f-\
e
e
~
~
Resolution Recognizing Herbert M. Shelton Upon His
Retirement
WHEREAS, Herbert M. Shelton has provided the Chesterfield County
Police Department with many years of loyal and dedicated service;
and
WHEREAS, Chesterfield County and the Board of Supervisors will
miss Herbert M. Shelton's diligent service.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that this Board of Supervisors
publicly recognized Herbert M. Shelton, and extends on behalf of its
members and the citizens of Chesterfield County their appreciation
for his service to the County.
AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that a copy of this Resolution be
presented to Herbert M. Shelton and that this Resolution be permanently
recorded among the papers of this Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield
County.
00 134
/cR.8.
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
.,. ~ r- w',
January 22, 1992
MEETING DATE:
ITEM NUMBER:
12.B.
SUBJECT: Resolution Recognizing John L. Wyatt Upon His Retirement
on January 3, 1992
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMAT ION:
Whereas, Mr. John L. Wyatt retired from the Chesterfield County
Department of Utilities, on January 3, 1992; and
Whereas, Mr. Wyatt has provided 28 years of quality service to
the citizens of Chesterfield County; and
Whereas, the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors and all
fello\\T employees: will certainly miss Mr. Wyatt I s service i and
Whereas, Mr. Wyatt was employed as one of three Construction
Inspectors and started \-lorking wi th the County in March of 1 963 ;
and
Whereas, Mr. Wyatt has inspected many of the ~ajor collector
sewer lines, pumping stations, water lines and water tanks in all
sections of the County; and
Whereas, Mr. Wyatt has been
inspectors and supervising these
continued to grow; and
instrumental
employees as
in training
the County
new
has
PREPARED BY~
()~ttu~
(
ATTACHMENTS: YES"
NO C
David H. Welchons
Director of Utilities
SIGNATURE:
~
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
00 135
BOS-9891
~........... If, -.
.",. ~
f;
e
e
Board Agenda item
January 22, 1992
Page 2
Whereas, Mr. Wyatt by his continued interest in his work and
expertise and kno\\11edge of the \\Tater and se\\Ter systems of the
Utility Department has thus made a significant contribution toward
providing quality service to the Citizens of Chesterfield County.
Now, Therefore, Be It Resolved, that the Chesterfield Board of
Supervisors publicly recognized Mr. Wyatt and extends on behalf of
its members and the citizens of Chesterfield County their
appreciation for his service to the County.
And, Be It Further Resolved, that a copy of this Resolution be
presented to Mr. Wyatt and that this Resolution be permanently
recorded among the papers of this Board of Supervisors of
Chesterfield County, Virginia
00 136
7
~!.
~~OS-9891
/~, t I
.. :.. , I -
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
MEET ING DATE :
January 22, 1992
ITEM NUMBER:
12.C.
SUBJECT:
Resolution - Dr. Robert B. Straube
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
BACKGROUND:
Dr. Robert Straube was recently appointed State Health
Commissioner by Governor Wilder. Dr. Straube served as Director
of Chesterfield's Health Department for nearly two years in
1986-87.
BOARD ACTION REQUESTED:
Adopt attached resolution commending Dr. Straube for his
accomplishments.
~E~EOBY:~~~~
Robert L. Masden
Deputy County Administrator
ATTACHMENTS: YES ~
NO [J
SIGNATURE:
~
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
00 137
/ ~
!J.~ -- )
v~ ~'
~
.
.
Dr. Robert Straube
WHEREAS, the Honorable Robert B. Straube, M.D. was appointed
State Health Commissioner on December 1, 1991; and
WHEREAS, prior to his appointment as Commissioner, Dr.
Straube served the State of Virginia in various capaci ties of
major responsibilities including Deputy Commissioner for
communi ty Heal th Services, Medical Epidemiologist, Director of
Health Hazard Control, Director of Preventive Medicine; and
WHEREAS I Dr . Robert Straube served the ci tizens of
Chesterfield County as the Director of the Chesterfield Health
Department from March 1, 1986 to September 16, 1987; and
WHEREAS, Dr. Straube was instrumental in helping plan and
construct our Human Services Building which currently houses the
Chesterfield County Health Department; and
WHEREAS, Dr. Straube has provided outstanding leadership in
health services delivery in Chesterfield County and throughout
the State of Virginia.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, by the Board of Supervisors
of Chesterfield County that Dr. Robert B. Straube is hereby
commended for his outstanding services to the citizens of
Chesterfield County and the State of Virginia; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors extends
its heartiest congratulation on his appointment to the high
office of Commissioner of Health for the State of Virginia.
00 138
BOS-9891
/,2. J).
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
MEETING DATE: January 22, 1992 ITEM NUMBER: 12 . D.
SUBJECT: Resolution Recognizing February, 1992 as Black History
Month in Chesterfield County
COUNTY ADMINISTRATORt S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
The Board of Supervisors is requested to recognize February as
Black History Month. The Parks and Recreation Department is
planning several activities to commemorate this historical month.
BACKGROUND
February is noted as Black History Month nationwide. It is a
time to highlight the accomplishments of African Americans.
Progr ams that" educa te and entertain are he Id throughout the
month.
Last year, Chesterfield County recognized February as African
American History Month. Major cultural and educational programs
highlighted the accomplishments of Black Americans. This year a
similar calendar of activities is planned to help educate the
community and engender cross cultural cooperation and
interaction.
PREPARED BY~
M . D. " e t e ,,- S tit Jr.
Director, Parks and Recreati n
ATTACHMENTS: YES"
NO 0
SIGNATURE:
~ 00 139
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
..- '.--:.a.
e
.
~
A kickoff event featuring the world renowned Spinners will open
the month-long celebration. Carter G. Woodson, a Virginian,
started the celebration in 1926. It has grown to be the largest
ethnic celebration in the county.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors approve and adopt
the attached resolution recognizing February as Black History
Month in Chesterfield County.
00 140
...
e
.
,..-'. .'~
Resolution Recognizing February, 1992
as Black History Month in Chesterfield County
Whereas, in 1991, Chesterfield County, with the generous
support of local businesses and institutions, was the only local
government in the Commonwealth to hold a month-long celebration
to commemorate the vast accomplishments of African-Americans; and
Whereas, African-Americans have made significant
contributions to the building of America from pre-ColumbUS to the
space age; and
Whereas, the county is cognizant of the contributions of
African-Americans to the building of this country and
Chesterfield County; and
Whereas, in 1926, Dr. Carter G. Woodson, historian and
native Virginian, set aside February as a time to formally
acknowledge the tremendous contributions of African-Americans to
the world and our nation's heritage; and
Whereas, Dr. Woodson's dream to commemorate the history,
struggle, challenges and achievements of African-Americans has
become the largest ethnic celebration in Amer.ica; and
Whereas, Chesterfield wishes to again provide a medium to
enhance an appreciation for the diversity of our community and
workforce; and
Whereas, the intent of the celebration is to educate,
entertain, provide for cross cultural interaction among citizens
of Chesterfield and heighten appreciation for the role of
African-Americans in shaping American history.
Now, Therefore, Be It Resolved that the Chesterfield County
Board of Supervisors recognize February as Black History Month
.. and.... hereby.. encourages all. citizens to join ..in the "Celebration of
Heritage and Achievement" throughout the month.
DO IlfO./
805.9891
/ ), I E ~ Ii 4t 3/ 'II
. ;.
. . ~ ...,..
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
MEETING DATE:January 22, 1992
ITEM NUMBER: 12. E. 1. 2 . 3.. 4 ·
SUBJECT:
Resolution Recognizing Matthew J. Davis, Joseph T.
Schmierer, Randy Johnson, and Matthew J. Thysell upon
Attaining Rank of Eagle Scout
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
Matthew J. Davis, and Joseph T. Schmierer, III, Beulah united
Methodist Church, Troop 880, and Randy Johnson, and Matthew J.
Thysell, st. John's Episcopal Church, Troop 819, have attained the
rank of Eagle Scout. They will be present with members of their
family to be r~cognized.
PREPARED BY~
ATTACHMENTS: YES"
NO D
SIGNATURE:
~
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
00 141
.
.
."
IiV
RECOGNIZING JOSEPH T. SCHMIERER, III
UPON HIS ATTAINING RANK OF EAGLE SCOUT
WHEREAS, The Boy Scouts of America was incorporated by
Mr. William D. Boyce on February 8, 1910; and
WHEREAS, The Boy Scouts of America was founded to promote
citizenship training, personal development and fitness of
individuals; and
WHEREAS, After earning at least twenty-one merit badges in a
wide variety of fields, serving in a leadership position in a
troop, carrying out a service project beneficial to his
community, being active in the troop, demonstrating Scout spirit
and living up to the Scout Oath and Law; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Joseph T. Schmierer, III, Beulah United
Methodist Church, Troop 880, has accomplished those high
standards of commitment and has reached the long-sought goal of
Eagle Scout which is received by less than two percent of those
individuals entering the scouting movement; and
WHEREAS, Growing through his experiences in Scouting,
learning the lessons of responsible citizenship and priding
himself on the great accomplishments of his County,
Ty is indeed a member of a new generation of prepared young
citizens of whom we can all be very proud.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Chesterfield County
Board of Supervisors hereby extends its congratulations to
Mr. Joseph T. Schmierer, III and acknowledges the good fortune of
the County to have such an outstanding young man as one of its
citizens.
00 1.42
.
.
....-.:,...,.
RECOGNIZING MATTHEW J. DAVIS
UPON HIS ATTAINING RANK OF EAGLE SCOUT
WHEREAS, The Boy Scouts of America was incorporated by
Mr. william D. Boyce on February 8, 1910; and
WHEREAS, The Boy Scouts of America was founded to promote
citizenship training, personal development and fitness of
individuals; and
WHEREAS, After earning at least twenty-one merit badges in a
wide variety of fields, serving in a leadership position in a
troop, carrying out a service project beneficial to his
community, being active in the troop, demonstrating Scout spirit
and living up to the Scout Oath and Law; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Matthew J. Davis, Beulah united Methodist
Church, Troop 880, has accomplished those high standards of
commitment and has reached the long-sought goal of Eagle Scout
which is received by less than two percent of those individuals
entering the Scouting movement; and
WHEREAS, Growing through his experiences in Scouting,
learning the lessons of responsible citizenship and priding
himself on the great accomplishments of his County,
Matthew is indeed a member of a new generation of_prepared young
citizens of whom we can all be very proud.
HOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Chesterfield County
Board of Supervisors hereby extends its congratulations to
Mr. Matthew J. Davis and acknowledges the good fortune of the
County to have such an outstanding young man as one of its
citizens.
00 143
.
.
...". ,r
~ MATlHEW J. rmYSEU.
UKIf HIS ATrAINnG RANK OF FAGrE sa:ur
WHERI?AS, '!he Boy Scouts of America was incorporated by
Mr. william D. Boyce on February 8, 1910; ani
~, '!he Boy Scouts of America was fourrled to promote
citizenship trainin;J, J:1ersonal development and. fitness of
individuals; ani
~, After e.a.mi.n;J at least twenty-one merit badges in a
wide variety of fields, servincJ in a leadership J.X>Sition in a
trcxJp, carrying out a service project beneficial to his
canmumity, :being active in the troop, demonstrating Scout spirit
ani living up to the Scout Oath ani law; ani
~, Mr. Matthew J. '!hysell, st. John's EPiscopal
Olurch, Troop 819 I has accomplished those high standards of
ccmnni:bnent ani has reached the lorg-sough.t goa.l of Eagle
Scout which is received by less than two J:1ercent of those
individuals entering the ScoutincJ moverrent i ani
~, GrQVincJ through his experiences in Scouting,
le.a.mi.n;J the lessons of responsible citizenship ani priding
himself on the great accomplishments of his County,
Ma.tt:hew is Weed a member of a new generation of prepared YO'1.Jn;J
citizens of worn we can all te very proud.
1Ui, ~ BE IT RESlLVED, that the Olesterfield County
Board of SUpervisors hereby extends its congratulations to
Mr. Ma.tthew J. rrhysell and acJmowledges the gcxxl fortune of
the County to have sum an outstanding young- man as one of
its citizens.
00 144
.
.
...:. "f
RECOGNIZING RANDY JOHNSON
UPON HIS ATTAINING RANK OF EAGLE SCOUT
WHEREAS, The Boy Scouts of America was incorporated by
Mr. William D. Boyce on February 8, 1910; and
WHEREAS, The Boy Scouts of America was founded to promote
citizenship training, personal development and fitness of
individuals; and
WHEREAS, After earning at least twenty-one merit badges in a
wide variety of fields, serving in a leadership position in a
troop, carrying out a service project beneficial to his
community, being active in the troop, demonstrating Scout spirit
and living up to the Scout Oath and Law; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Randy Johnson, st. John's Episcopal Church,
Troop 819, has accomplished those high standards of commitment
and has reached the long-sought goal of Eagle Scout which is
received by less than two percent of those individuals entering
the Scouting movement; and
WHEREAS, Growing through his experiences in Scouting,
learning the lessons of responsible citizenship and priding
himself on the great accomplishments of his County,
Randy is indeed a member of a new generation of prepared young
citizens of whom we can all be very proud.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Chesterfield County
Board of Supervisors hereby extends its congratulations to
Mr. Randy Johnson and acknowledges the good fortune of the County
to have such an outstanding young man as one of its citizens.
00 145
e
,.
, .. ~ ..
_ J,. _
-'\
,
----- -....: -=- -- .......---.. ..... _ . t
.~. '
$-
fl1iJ~J Jo It #SoAl
1fi.p, 8/~ 5 I. Jdhp'r
~r --~ ...
C?I'~~~
tJA't. Ol ~
~;2'~~~
_-~=~_.-~~o.~ c_".::l_-- _~~:
~~. .;: ~ .
e
00 146
. ...
e e
;VI )tflrl,evJ 3. DA lllS
J;s:ep~ T 5~ rn ;e get<.)TII
\' ~ ,.
y
"--wC) up) <?~ 0
lSeu-AA~ UN t'-~'tl) )/)'?'PYi'QJ I ~ ~
ct
Jf)~ ~~ ~.
7 :-1)0
e e
(t ,
.r .
.J .J 17)1 se / I
l;1oop g/15~ ~
4, ?:(J()pM,
i:" . ..-' - .I" ~
BQS.9891
i..;..
.-l\
~~
/3.11.
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
MEETING DATE: January 22, 1992
ITEM NUMBER~
13. A.
SUBJECT: HEARINGS OF CITIZENS ON UNSCHEDULED ~mTTERS OR CLAIMS
!tir. John E. Dyke, Regardil~lg. Ches,terfield Coun ty I S New
Footings Requirement~-Reiated to rTew I-Iousing Costs
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
See attached.
ATTACHMENTS: YES"
PRE~ED BY~
NO Cl
SIGNAT URE :
~
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
(){) /~
~~
("
.
.
~
- ~"'
'f
ENDICOTT CONSTRUCTION CO., INC.
P.o. BOX 357
MIDLOTHIAN, VA: 23113
January 15, 1992
Mr. Lane Ramsey
Chesterfield County Administrator
Chesterfield County, Virginia
RE: Chesterfield County's new fnotings requirement related to new
new housing costs
Dear Lane:
I have been one of the few builders who got a building permit under the
new footings requirements. I found the resulting delays excessive, the
extra cost resulting from the new requirements gigantic, and the
resulting benefits to my customers of this expenditure of money virtu-
ally non-existant.
The problems started when I applied for a permit for constructinn of a
4500 square foot house with attached garage in 8 platted subdivision of
200 exist;ng homes, all having been approved for septic systems inclu-
ding my lot. I was told that because my tax grid map touched a rough
outline of the Triassic Basin or that the county thought this Boil was
poor that I had to have 8 80i1 test made and obtain a letter from a
certified professional engineer suggesting 8 footing design compatible
with the 80ils found, regardless of whether the 8011s proved to be
good, bad or indifferent.
If no poor soils were found. the cost of these teste and the necessary
letter from an engineer would be $ 600-700. If there were problem
soils, the design cost would be more. Each engineer has his own '.pet"
footing design which he uses freQuently 80 that by definition our
requirement that an "engineer's letter be submitted automatically
guarantees that al' footings wi'11 be either wider, deeper in the
ground, thicker, re;nforced and stronger concrete that the One and Two
Family Code requires. Such was my case.
Some marginal 80il was found at one corner of the proposed house site.
Because of this, my. engineer required the whole footing be ubeefed up",
not just in the area where the marginal 80il was found. What did this
a11 mean? .
1 .
The foot i ng was to be 24 u x 12 U rather than 18" x alt as the
code required.
2.
It was to- be dug 48'. in the ground rather than the 24" code
requirement.
00
147
3. 3 15 steel rods applied to footing. The code requires none.
4. 3500 lb./square foot concrete rather than 2500 lb./square
foot that...the code requi res.
r-
".""""
-.
TEL No.804-794-7454
.
Jan. 4.87
6:26 P.02
"'
.804-794-:-745
rr
What did this extra'footing design mean in dollars and cents? This new
footing design 'cost in excess of $ 9860. than the same house I built 12
months ago. See Attached cost breakdown.
Since the price level of housing remains depressed. I will be unable to
pass on this extra cost to my customers. Is this a better footing than
I used a year ago?" Are three coats of paint better than two? Yes.
But is the huge cost differential worth it? Will this "beefed up"
footing guarantee no future Boil related problems? My engineer won't
guarantee it nor will I. There are Bome in the engineer;ng community
who feel that this .extra width and depth footing compared to code foot-
ing size may create. its own problems by exposing more surface area of
the footing to what~ver movement the Boils may make.
Where will this 80ils policy lead us? It will lead me away from the
western half of Chesterfield County because I can not afford to pay
this extra footing cost and not recoup it from my customers. Will my
customers be willing to pay this huge extra cost with no clearly def-
ined extra value. benefit or guarantee attached? I think not. Do we
want this soils policy to force builders away from where we have com-
mitted 60 many dollars to infrastructure, IE. schools, roads, sewers.
etc., to those other areas of the county where we don't have the
infrastructure to handle the projected growth? Do we want to force our
builders to quit building in Chesterfield County and go to other
counties where these excessive soil requirements are not a problem? Do
we want those builders who stay to be at 8uch a large competitive dis-
advantage against either other metro counties or other parts of our own
county?
What can we do to solve this soil problem 80 that we can continue a
balanced program of healthy growth?
1. Require soil tests only in areas clearly within the defined
Tr;assic Basin or those aress with known soil problems.
2. Require an engineer's letter only if these 80il tests show
poor soi '.8.
3. Define the 80ils problem. We need to know Quickly what
footing problems we have and exactly what caused them. Were
they caused by poor footing design, poor footing installa-
tion. prolonged drought. homeowner changes, building on
improper 80;1 such as fill or expansive clays.
/
How do we find out?
1 .
Convene your soils committee as 800n 8S possible. It should
be made up of an equal balance of informed citizens (not
those with an axe to grind), builders, developers, profes-
sional engineers (with housing experience, not bridge build-
ers), 80i"18 engineers, and bu; lding inspection officials.
These members should be nominated because of their expertise
in home building, residential design, 9011 analysis, etc.,
not for pOlitical reasons.
00
14,8
'-8 b 4 - 794 - 7 4-:;
I" 6'
T~O.804-794-7454
.
Jan. 4,87 6:28 P.03
r~
"
2. Hire a professional engineer with residential experience.
Have him .investigate the worse footing failure cases or 8
good sampling thereof and report back to the Board of Super-
visors concerning the causes and possible remedies.
3. When the 'extent of the problem is defined then specific
changes in designs or inspections can be implemented by the
Building Inspection Department to cure these specific defi-
ciencies, .1f any.
Once we know what the Bpec1fi~ problem areas are we can take steps to
address the problem "areas and expensive blanket reQuirements on all
housing may not be neces8~ry
As 8 concerned builder, I and our Richmond Home Builders Association
will be happy to help find these solutions.
Very truly yours,
~~
John E. Dyke
00 '149
.....
TE'~O.804-794-7454
.
Jan. 4,87 6:28 P.04
...... .
804-7~4#-745
'i
4600 Square Foot House
Attached two car garage
Foot; ng: 24 II x 12 It. 48 n deep, 3 15 rods, 3500 1 b. concrete
EKtra costs over normal hcode" footing
1. Engineer's letter and 80i1 tests
2. Dig footing wider and dA~~er and install steel
600' x 3.00
$
1200.
1800.
3. Three extra courses of block
462 . 2.50 x 3
3465.
4. Steel
1200.
5. Extra concrete for larger footing
23 yards x 52.. per yard
6. Stone dust to"backfill walls
11 96 .
600.
7. Extra foundation grading
600.
TOTAL EXTRA COSTS OVER SAME HOUSE LAST YEAR
$ 9861 .
00 150
~ ~.....
.
~
.." ..
ENDICOTT CONSTRUCTION CO., INC.
P.o. BOX 357
MIOLOTHIAN, VA: 23113
January 15, 1992
Mr. Lane Ramsey
Chesterfield County Administrator
Chesterfield County. ,Virginia
RE: Chesterfield County.s new fnotings requirement related to new
new housing costs
Dear Lane:
I have been one of the few builders who got B building permit under the
new footings requirements. I found the resulting delays excessive, the
extra cost resulting from the new requirements gigantic, and the
resulting benefits to my customers of this expenditure of money virtu-
ally non-existent.
The problems started when I applied for a permit for con8tructi~n of a
4500 square foot house with attached garage in a platted subdivision of
200 existing homes, all having been approved for septic systems inclu-
ding my lot. I was told that because my tax gr;d map touched a rough
outline of the Triassic Basin or that the county thought this Boil was
poor that I had to have a 80i1 test made and obtain a letter from a
certified professional engineer suggesting B footing design compatible
with the Boils found, regardless of whether the soils proved to be
good, bad or indifferent.
If no poor soils were found. the cost of these tests and the necessary
letter from an engineer would be $ 600-700. If there were problem
soils. the design cost would be more. Each engineer has his own I.pet"
footing design which he uses frequently so that by definition our
requirement that an ~ngineer'8 letter be submitted automatically
guarantees that all footings wi'l1 be either wider, deeper in the
ground, thicker. reinforced and stronger concrete that the One and Two
Family Code requires. Such was my case.
Some marginal 80i1 was found at one corner of the proposed house site.
Because of this, my engineer reQuired the whole footing be IIbeefed up",
not just in the area where the marginal 60il was found. What did this
a11 mean?
1. The footing was to be 24" x 1211 rather than 1811 )( SU as the
code required.
2. It was to be dug 4811 in the ground rather than the 24u code
requirement.
3. 3 .5 stee 1 .. rods app 1 i ed to foot i ng . The code requ i res none.
4. 3500 lb./square foot concrete rather than 2600 lb./square
foot that the code requires.
6. Backfill with stone dust against the foundation.
804~.l9~:-7 4~
T~No.804-794-7454
J_ 4.87 6 : 26 P. 02
;,
What did this extra footing design mean in dollars and cents? This new
footing design cost in excess of $ 9860. than the same house I built 12
months ago. See Attached cost breakdown.
Since the price level of housing remains depressed, I will be unable to
pass on this extra cost to my customers. Is this a better footing than
I used a year ago? Are three coats of paint better than two? Yes.
But ;s the huge cost differential worth it? Wi" this IIbeefed up'.
footing guarantee no future 80il related problems? My engineer won't
guarantee it nor will I. There are Bome in the engineering community
who feel that this extra width and depth footing compared to code foot-
ing size may create its own problems by exposing more surface area of
the footing to whatever movement the 80ils may make.
Where will this Boils pOlicy lead us? It will lead me away from the
western half of Chesterfield County because I can not afford to pay
this extra footing cost and not recoup it from my customers. Will my
customers be willing to pay this huge extra cost with no clearly def-
ined extra value, benefit or guarantee attached? I think not. Do we
want this 80;ls policy to force builders away from where we have com-
mitted so many dollars to infrastructure, IE. schools, roads, sewers, ~~
etc., to those other areas of the county where we don't have the
infrastructure to handle the projected growth? 00 we want to force our
builders to quit building in Chesterfield County and go to other
counties where these excessive soil requirements are not a problem? Do
we want those builders who stay to be at 8uch a large competitive dis-
advantage against either other metro counties or other parts of our own
count)'?
What can we do to solve this soil problem 60 that we can continue a
balanced program of healthy growth?
1. Require 8011 tests only in areas clearly within the defined
Tr;assic Basin or those areas with known Boil problems.
2. Require an engineer's letter only if these 80i1 tests show
poor soils.
3. Define the 80i1s problem. We need to know quickly what
footing problems we have and exactly what caused them. Were
they caused by poor footing design, poor footing installa-
tion, prolonged drought, homeowner changes, building on
improper.soil such as fill or expansive clays.
How do we find out?
1. Convene your soils committee as 800n as possible. It should
be made up of an equal balance of informed citizens (not
those with an axe to grind), builders, developers, profes-
sional engineers (with housing experience, not bridge build-
ers), so;ls engineers. and building inspection officials.
These members should be nominated because of their expertise
in home building, residential design, 80il analysis, etc..,
not for pOlitical reasons.
804-794-745
,~ III .,
T~O.804-794-7454
J~ 4,87 6:28 P.03
(i
2. Hire 8 professional engineer with residential experience.
Have him investigate the worse footing failure cases or 8
good sampling thereof and report back to the Board of Super-
visors concerning the causes and possible remedies.
3. When the extent of the problem is defined then specific
changes in designs or inspections can be implemented by the
Building Inspection Department to cure these specific def;-
ciencies.- if any.
Once we know what the specif;~ problem areas are we can take steps to
address the problem areas and expensive blanket requirements on all
housing may not be neCes6~ry
As a concerned builder. I and our Richmond Home Builders Association
will be happy to help find these solutions.
Very truly yours,
~~
John E. Dyke
804- ~94~-7 45
T~O.804-794-7454
J~ 4.87 6:28 P.04
. J ...4
:;
4500 Square Foot House
Attached two car garage
Footing= 2411 x 12u, 4811 deep, 3 #5 rods, 3500 lb. concrete
Extra costs over normal "bode>> footing
1. Engineer's letter and 80il tests
$
1200"
2" Dig footing wider and dA~~er and instal' steel
600' x 3.00
1800"
3~ Three extra courses of block
462 ct 2.50 x 3
3465.
1200.
4. Steel
5. Extra concrete for larger footing
23 yards x 52'~ per yard
6. Stone dust to backfill walls
1196.
500.
7. Extra foundation grading
600.
TOTAL EXTRA COSTS OVER SAME HOUSE LAST YEAR
$ 986 1 .
BOS-9891
"
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVI SORS
AGENDA
MEETING DATE: January 22, 1992
13.B.
ITEM NUMBER~.
SUBJECT:
HEARINGS OF CITIZENS ON UNSCHEDULED MATTERS OR CLAIMS
Request of Veterinarians to Discuss Assessment of
Business License Taxes
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR1 S COMMENTS;
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
A group of thirteen veterinarians and an accountant have
asked to speak to the Board concerning their business license tax
assessments and a recent audit of veterinarian businesses
conducted by the Commissioner of Revenue. A copy of the group's
letter request is attached.
Title 58.1, Chapter 35 of the Code of Virginia, 1950 , as
amended, authorizes localities to adopt business license tax
ordinances. The County first adopted a business license tax
ordinance in 1962. Under State law the Board of Supervisors is
authorized to establish by ordinance which business
classifications will be taxed and at what tax rate. Most
businesses in the County are taxed under one or more of the
following classifications: 1) wholesale or retail merchant; 2)
pe rsona 1 service, 3) pro fes 5 iona 1 servi ce and 4 ) con tr actor s .
However, once the business license tax classifications and tax
rates are set by ordinance, the Commissioner of Revenue is solely
(Continued)
PREfMED BY~
ATTACHMENTS: YES ~
0403:6068:30
Lane B. Ramsey
County Administrator
NO 0
SIGNATURE:
~
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
00
.
.
....::: .............~~..it
January 22, 1992
Page Two
responsible for making the business license tax assessment on
each individual business. The Board has no legal authority to
become involved in the assessment process.
In the latter part of 1991, the Commissioner of Revenue
conducted an audit of veterinarian businesses and concluded that
previous license tax assessments of these businesses were
incorrect. Pursuant to County ordinance, the Commissioner
subsequently corrected these assessments and corrected tax bills
were issued. The group of veterinarians asking to address the
Board disagrees with the Commissioner's corrected assessments and
recently on January 14, 1992 the Commissioner and the
veterinarians met to discuss the veterinarians' concerns. If the
veterinarians continue to disagree with their assessments, they
may contest the assessments in the Chesterfield County Cireui t
Court under a procedure established by State law.
As a matter of law, the Board cannot change the assessment
decisions made by the Commissioner of Revenue. The Board could,
however, amend the business license tax ordinance to 1) eliminate
the license tax classification under which veterinarians are
taxed (professional service) or 2) reduce the current tax rate of
$.58 per $100 of gross receipts for the professional service
category. Either of these changes would affect all professional
service providers in the County (i.e., doctors, lawyers,
accountants) .
0403:6068:30
00 152""".
-.
.
-": ";1' '- ~
.,-,7- .
~ .
. '
Mr. L~ne Ramsey
County Administrator
P 6 B o"x 40. . .,
Chesterfield.. Va. 2)832
1'-1'5-92
Sir.
.' .,' ,
W'e.l would like to be added, to + the. agenda ,to speak. 'before
the Board of Supervisors at t~e January 22 meeting.
The topic of discussion'will- be the audit performed'
on the veterinarians of Chesterfield County by the~ office.-
.of the Commissioner of Revenue.
We'.hope that the Board of Supervisors will be able to C~l.,.~l
clarify th~ Code pertainin~ to.the collection of rev~nues
when applying for a business licensei
~ .
, .
~~ry 1. ?i"trik Lurl KIlo .Io~nim:tl Hoopi t'al
Charles Hickey Pocoshock Animal Hospital
Mitch Ted~schi Cloverhill Animal Hospital
. " ~illiam Dunnavant Ironbridge Animal Hospital
. Owen McFadden Midlothian Animal Hospital
John Terrell Sycamore Animal Hospital
Richa~d Kitterman Oxbridge. A~imal Hospital
Qlenn Deckert Baldwin Creek Animal Hospital
David Moore - Hu~enot Road Animal Hospital '
Michael. Anthony Stonehenge Animal' Hospi t'al/Swift Cree'k.,
Carter Burkey Bermuda Hundred" Animal. Hospital
Nick Elam Elam Animal Hospital '
Richard Jord~n Town and Country Animal Hospital'
.'Ralph,Amernick Ralph Amernick &C6.
The above is' a list of speakers, wishing to address
this subject. If there are any questions please
.at 276-5554, my office.
0.'1 ()IJ. · .
of ~~
I ' , .
D~. Cary~Za: i
00 1.53
~
'.
It/- .
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
MEETING DATE: Januarv 22, 1992
ITEM NUMBER ~
14.
SUBJECT=
Public Hearing to Consider the Sale of a House Located
at 3415 Logandale Avenue to Satisfy a Debt to the
Nursing Horne
COUNTY ADMINISTRATORt S COMMENTS~
R~J A~
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
As a condi tion to admission to the Nursing Home I patients
and their families are required to sign contracts obligating
themselves to pay for the costs of all services not covered by
Medicaid or insurance. There are occasions when the federal
government retroactively disqualifies patients from the Medicaid
program resq.l ting in unpaid bills for which indigent clients
typically have no resources to pay. In order to pay those bills
and become eligible for Medicaid, patients on occasion will
convey all their assets to the County when there are no other
sources of payment. In all instances, the County attempts to
liquidate the assets as quickly as possible.
The house of a former patient, Gladys Clary, was conveyed to
the County to satisfy a $34,000 debt for services she received at
the Nursing Home when she was retroactively declared ineligible
for Medicaid. The County presently has a contract for the sale
of the house to Ms. Roseella Patterson for $33,000. Because
Gladys Clary also owed approximately $24,000 to Chippenham
(continued)
PREPARED BY:
.~~
Steven L. Micas
County Attorney
ATTACHMENTS: YES 0
NO pit
0600:1722a:b44
SIGNATURE:
cI<<
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
00
808-9891
-. --. __.~ 1 ~.
1"
f
--
.
.
January 22, 1992
Page 2
Public Hearing
Hospital for a pre-existing debt, the County
approximately 50% of the proceeds of the sale
$16,000 that will be returned to the Nursing Home.
will receive
resulting in
Recommendation: Staff recommends that the sale of the
property be approved.
0600:1722a:b44
00 155~.
~...
.. ~
v.
lit
\
00ARD OF SUPERVISORS
MAURICE B. SULLIVAN. CHAIRMAN
MI DlOT HIAN DISTR1CT
c. P. CURRIN~ JR.. VICE CHAIRMAN
BER MUDA D~STRICT
G. H. APPLEGATE
CLOVER H~Ll DISTRICT
HARRY G. DANIEL
DALE OISTA'CT
JESSE J. MAYES
MA TOACA DISTRICT
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
.e CHESTERFIELD COUNT'
P.o~ Box 40
CHESTERFIELD, VIRGINIA 23832-0040
MEMORANDUM
Richmond News Leader
Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors
January 7, 1992
Meetings and Coming Events
One (1) time, Tuesday, January 14, 1992
Please confirm by calling the Clerk to the Board
of Supervisors Office at 748-1200. Also, please
fax me a computer printout of the ad--Fax number
748-3032.
PLEASE SEND TEAR SHEET WITH BILL.
~
jb
...
Dolezal
to the Board
Attachment
LANE B. RAMSEY
COUNTY ADMINISTRA.TOR
~...
e
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
P~O. Box 40
CHESTERFIELD, VIRGINIA 23832-0040
e
-,.
)
~OARD OF SUPERVISORS
MAURICE B. SULLIVAN. CHAJRMAN
MIDLOTH!AN DISTRICT
C. F. CURArN. JR.. VICE CHAIRMAN
BERM UQA DISTRICT
G.H.APPLEGATE
CLOVER Hill DJSTRICT
HARRY G. DANIEL
DALE DISTRICT
LANE B. RAMSEY
COUN TV ADM fN ISTRA TOR
JESSEJ.MAYES
MA TOACA DISTRJCT
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Progress Index
Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors
FROM:
DATE:
January.?, 1992
SUBJECT:
Meetings and Coming Events
One (1) time, Tuesday, January 14, 1992
Please confirm by calling the Clerk to the Board
of Supervisors Office at 748-1200. Also, please
fax me a computer printout of the ad--Fax number
748-3032.
PLEASE SEND TEAR SHEET WITH BILL.
"an S. Dolezal
to the Board
jb
Attachinent
.r.
~
.
;
"e
e
TAKE NOTICE
Take notice that the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield
County, Virginia, at a regular meeting on January 22, 1992
at 7:00 p.m. in the County Public Meeting Room at
Chesterfield Co~rthouse, 'Chesterfield, Virginia, will hold a
public hearing ".to consider the conveyance of property
located at 3415 Logandale Avenue, RiChmond, Virginia, to
Roseella Patterson.
I
~ - Richmond e
Newspapers, 1])1/(0
e
An A ffil iate of Media Gen era I
P.o. BOX C-32333
RICHMOND I VIRGI NIA 23293-0001
804-649-6000
COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
ATTN: JOAN DOLEZAL
~I. O. BOX 4()
CHESTERFIELD VA
23832
DATE
CODE
DESCRIPTION
CREDITS
TOTAL
INCHES AMOUNT
() 1 / 1 L"
B
LEGAL NO.r I CE
CONSIDER CONVEYANCE
3415 LOGANDALE AVE:
13
1
$42.38
!
~
'- "IMe~~,
: Take notice that the Board of Su- '.
. pelVisorn of Supervisors of 9hes~
tert.eld County, Virginia. at a regu- '.
: tar meeting on January 22, 199.2
at 7:00 p.rn, 1n the County Pu~lIc .
Meeting Room at Ch9S~e~I~ld .
CourthOuse, Chesterf,ield. V~rgln.fa. :
win hoid a pubUc heanng to consld- .:
er the conveyance of property lo-
cated 3t 3415. ~dale Avenuej
Richmond, Virgtma. to Roseella
Patterson.
!
l
This is ~o certify that the att~ched LEG~L NOTICk
was published by Ri~hffiond Newspapers, Inc., in the C~ty
of Richmond,; State pf Virginia, on ~he follo~ing dat~s:
I
I
Richmond Newspapers, Inc.
. Pub~isher of,
THE RICHMONb TIMES-D~SPATCH
THE RICHMOND NEWS L~ADER
T i rnes-Di spat ch
~
N~ws Leader
()1/14/92 .
j
The first
!
i "("Isert i CIYI t:-e i rfg
. t
9 1 V Eo YOr. . . .
i
(11114/92
Sworn.to and. SUQ~~ri1b~q9~fore
rne t hIS ! JAN b 1 ~l ;
QJ/Z rf7 4J~~~-/
f 1 Notary PUpllC
state of Vir~inia '
City of Richmond
My CCorllrllissiCly., expit~es -8.EP 3 0 1995
I
I
I
WHEN REMITTING PLEASE R~FER TO YOUR CUSJOMER # 220806 I
j i1@iftoo, ~ c::> Ii
$42.38
..
. -... ".. ~.. ~...I""). ~ ~ ~ t - ..
'::' ...... : ...) ( " .. r~" .;. .,,"
"... ~:. ~ y-v /) /j.. <. ~ <'" ~~ ' f " ~.""-~. .
/...., ~.,j oJ. ,(j n ;:....,~r ~~l-'4... ..::;y...,~+..v.... ~
% CASH DISCOUNT IF PAID ON
OR BEFORE 15th OF THE SUCCEEDING MONTH.
NO DISCOUNT ALLOWED THEREAFTER.
! r .~. . ~ ~ :: ~ '~..: ..'~~ ~~ ~~t.~~~. =,:(,,!.~~, 1:~~ ~")}J
~"~~ ~~J~~~~:' ~ 1~: ~~