Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
03-10-1999 Packet
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Meeting Date: March l0t 1999 Item Number: 2. Sub, iect: County Administrator's Comments - Chesterfield Business Council Retention Committee Update to Board of Supervisors County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator' Board Action Requested: Summary of Information: The Chesterfield Business Council Business Retention Committee visited existing businesses in Chesterfield County throughout 1998. The purpose of these visits was to interview the companies to find out their impressions of the business climate in Chesterfield County. Mr. Steve Erie, Chairman of the Business Retention Committee, will be reporting on the visits made during 1998 and summarize the findings. Agi9f2lerk ~ PreparerS, ~/'~ ~ ~/~t4f',, James'C.. Dunn Attachments: ~'] Yes Title: Asst. Director~ Econ. Development 001 : I CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page, 1 of~ Meeting Date: March 10, 1999 Item Number: 5. A. Subject: Resolution Recognizing Charlotte L. Lancaster Upon Her Retirement County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Adoption of the Attached Resolution Summary of Information: Preparer: Richard ~McEl~sh, P.E. Attachments: Title: Director. Environmental Engineering # Yes ~-~ No .- 00~ WHEREAS, Charlotte L. Lancaster will retire from the Chesterfield County Environmental Engineering Department on March 31, 1999 and has provided twenty-five years of outstanding service to the citizens of Chesterfield County; and WHEREAS, Mrs. Lancaster has exhibited growth and flexibility in her position, seeing it evolve from a strictly manual drafting position to a highly technical and specialized position utilizing geographic information system technology; and WHEREAS, Mrs. Lancaster was instrumental in developing and implementing the manual updates to the 1980 Census Bureau GBF/DIME file from 1981 to 1989, until the County's conversion to the automated LandTrak system which she has maintained from 1989 to present, and in developing and implementing the Environmental Engineering "Kitty Fund" with profits going to a credit union account to fund department activities; and WHEREAS, Mrs. Lancaster created the format and layout of the annual County Map Guide, completed all the graphic work required to produce the Map Guide and its associated product, the County Wall Map, from the map's inception until 1996 when those products became semi- computerized; and WHEREAS, Mrs. Lancaster has managed the input of all acreage parcel splits; street centerline and address ranges; and state route number additions to the geographic information system; and WHEREAS, Mrs. Lancaster had, before the widespread use of computer technology throughout the County, provided graphic arts and drafting skills to a variety of departments at their request for special projects; and WHEREAS, Mrs. Lancaster served as the Environmental Engineering representative to the Chesterfield Employees' Association from its inception until 1991 and served as the United Way coordinator for the department from 1985 to 1991; and WHEREAS, Mrs. Lancaster has provided personal customer service to the citizens of Chesterfield County in a manner that exhibits professionalism, courtesy, dedication, and quality; and WHEREAS, Chesterfield County and the Board of Supervisors will miss Mrs. Lancaster's diligent service. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors publicly recognizes the outstanding contributions of Mrs. Charlotte L. Lancaster and extends, on behalf of its members and the citizens of Chesterfield County, their appreciation for her service to the County, their congratulations upon her retirement, and their best wishes for a long and happy retirement. AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that a copy of this resolution be presented to Mrs. Lancaster and that this resolution be permanently recorded among the papers of this Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County, Virginia. CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of_t_ Meeting Date: March 10. 1999 Item Number: 5. B. Subject: Recognition of Firefighter David D. Conyers Upon His Retirement After 25 Years of Dedicated Service to Chesterfield County County. Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Adoption of attached resolution. Summary_ of Information: Stephen A. Elswick Attachments: Yes ~-~ No Title: Chief of Department Resolution of the BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CHESTERFIELD COUNTY RECOGNIZING FIREFIGHTER DAVID D. CONYERS UPON HIS RETIREMENT WHEREAS, David D. Conyers, began his public service with the County as a firefighter in the Fire Department on June 1, 1973, and has faithfully served Chesterfield County for twenty- five years; and WHEREAS, by providing quality public service, David D. Conyers has symbolized the type of employee Chesterfield County seeks; and WHEREAS, David D. Conyers' desire to do a good job has been a primary factor that has permitted him to perform at a high level while always striving for excellence; and WHEREAS, David D. Conyers, displayed a caring attitude toward all of his customers, often going out of his way to help those in need, and demonstrated excellent teamwork skills by always being available to assist his co-workers, volunteers and the citizens of Chesterfield County. WHEREAS, David D. Conyers has been effective in working with all groups, including co-workers, volunteers and the citizens of Chesterfield County. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors publicly recognizes the contributions of David D. Conyers, expresses the appreciation of all residents for his service to the County, their congratulations upon his retirement, and their best wishes for a long and happy retirement. AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that a copy of this resolution be presented to David D. Conyers and that this resolution be permanently recorded among the papers of this Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County, Virginia. 0O5 Date: Subiect: CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA March 10, 1999 Page I of I Item Number: 6. A. Work Session on County Administrator's FY2000 Proposed Budget County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: ~ Board Action Requested: Hold a work session on the County Administrator's FY2000 Proposed Budget Summary of Information: This time has been set for a work session on the County Administrator's FY2000 Proposed Budget. This work session is the second of three work sessions during which staff will present proposed expenditures for FY2000. A presentation will be ~ade on the FY2000 Proposed Budget, including completion of the Human Services presentation and review of requested changes to the CIP. The Fire Department will also present a budget overview, including information related to Emergency Medical Services. Presentations from the Community Development Division, Schools and Constitutional Officers are scheduled for the afternoon of March 24, 1999. Preparer: L~,(j/~'~, [ .%1'(. [% ~ '"'] Title: Director, Budget and Manaqement Rebecca T. Dickson Attachments: Yes 007 OO9 '-0 ;> © 0 -+--, © ~ · · · · · 011 0 0 0~.3 o ~ 0 0 0 o 0 015 016 i · 017 el,~l (..) 0 c~ 0 O;85 026 0~8 029 ° ~ · · · · · · · PRAC's PRIORITIES l~rks md P~c~ufim Ad~ory ~m Prio~ti~d Addl~k List Bamtnll/Sofihfli Fidd & IVhintemme Im~v~ $30,000 Spring Footl~ll Le4~gm 6,600 Additional 1 ~hts Tune for Bmelafll/Soflhall 3,000 School Facility Rental for Omateading 1,500 Top hiority Itt~m Tolal $44,200 NEED A LITTLE HELP Human Services Division I P~ks ~i 03~ CO INUATION FROM FEBRUARY 24, ~999 MEETING HISTORIC CHESTERFIELD COUNTY MUSEUM · Museum Visitation increased to 17,026 from 16,689 despite closing 1917 Courthouse 2x week... · Opened new temporary gallery with 4 new exhibits. · New exhibit on History of County for 250th - Lord Chesterfield - Tobacco Road HISTORY IS IMPORTANT! ! County Museum .................. ? ............ : .............. ! FY2000 ! ___C_h__a_n_g__e. ~ FY98 FY99 Biennial FY2000 From FYg9 .......... ~.u_aJ ......... _A~!. _o_p_t_e~__:. ~_pI a n_n~..d__ __P_.r 0_~.d_: Adopted '.Personnel $131,761 $136,300i $136,300 $150,000 10.1% Operating 5,480 0i 0! 0 0.0%i Capital _0! _0! 0! _0! 0.0%i Total $137,241 $136,300 $136,300 $150,000 10.1~-~ Revenue 49,7881 53 700 0i 57,900 7.8% 7 · " 033 HISTORIC CHESTERFIELD COUNTY MUSEUM · 250th Anniversary activities/Phase I museum improvements underway.., with the $38,000 approved last year... · Phase II funding included in CIP ($46,000) · Need to fund phases III for museum improvements: cost $162,500 (CIP). EXTENSION SERVICES · Keep Chesterfield Clean Won Statewide Award... · Dupom Square/ESL program receives Robert Wood Johnson grant fimding · Master gardeners, money management programs helping seniors oa4 Keep Virginia Beautiful Clean Award: Education Category Dawn Lerda and Ellis Britton a~d Lt. Governor Hager MONEY 2000! Extension Servi=es FY98 FYgg : Biennial ~ From ~ O~ra~ng 170,~ 180,~0 193,700 1~,200 3.8~ 1 DUPONT OSCARS! Limited English Speaking iC~pitzl Change O~ FY98 i FY99 i Biennial FY2000 From FYgg Aotual !Adoptedi Planned Proposed Adopted Personnel $0 $0i $34,300} N/A Operating Oi Oi 5,7001 O~ !Total $0 $0! $40,0001 N/A Revenue 01-- 0! i 20,000i N/A Net Cost $0! $0! $0', $20,0001 N/A JUVENILE PROBATION INCLUDING VJCCCA · VJCCCA fund from state responding to needs of juvenile offenders... · DCJS funding research studies on recidivism... · Space issues will be resolved by new JDR Courthouse now under construction. 2 Juvenile Probation FY2000 Change FY98 FY99 Biennial FY2000 From FY99 Actual Adopted Planned Proposed Adopted Persondel $35 $0 $01 $2,400 Operating 67,988 68,700: 70,500! 71,100i 3.5% :=Capital 0! 01 _0i 2,100! N/A! !Total $68,023 $68,700 $70,500 $75,600: 10.0%i !Revenue Net Cost 23,031 13,000_!____J1.~.~3~0.!_ _~! 6.~..000 23.1% $~,992: $55,700 $57,200 $59,600 ?.0%~ Virginia Juvenile Community Crime Control (VJCCCA) FY2000 Change! FY98 FY99 Biennial FY2000 From FY99 '~ Actual Adopted Planned Proposed Adopted Personnel $726,468 $981,300 $945,400:: $869,000 -11.4%i Operating 380,3841 590,100 590,100 690,700 17.0%1 _Cap_i~_l__' . ___3_1724 ....... _~64..,200 ...... _74_z200' 40,000 -37.7%i Total $1,137,976 $1,635,600 $1,599,700~ $1,599,700 Revenue 1;137,976 1,599,700 lr563,800! lr599,700 Net Cost $0'~ $35,900 $35,900! $0 0.0%~ -100.0%; 087 JUVENILE DETENTION HOME · State studying funding formula changes: the state presently funds 50% of all costs. · Design contract approved for expansion project: adds 58 more beds beginning in 2001 · Present facility is 31 persons over rated capacity of 33: may need funds to use other residential facilities. Expansion done in 2001 Juvenile Detention Home iOperating Change $1,359,600! 283 500~ 4.4% FY98 FY99 Biennial FY2000 Aotual Adopted Planned Proposed Adopted Personnel _. $1,___2~7..8_, 76__?..~ $1,306,400:$1,306,400 4.1% 240,4871 271,500! 278,200! Capital i _____3,,~20~____.0_; 0! 0! 0.0% Total $1, 522, 976 : $1,577,900: $1,584,600! $1,643 1001 4.1%! Revenue 901,584 843,500: 86,41700! 887,900: 5.3%: Net Cast $621,3921 $734,4001 $719,900~ $755,2001 2.8% 4 0;38 YOUTH GROUP HOME · Currently operating at total capacity which could portend expansion needs in the furore. · Youth Group Home recently received 100% perfect score for state licensure! CSA COMPREHENSIVE SERVICES ACT · Budget predicated on successful launching of Medicaid funding by state for therapeutic foster care and residential services. · New software management system being implemented. · Will propose operating a new CSA group home for autistic kids to save funds... 5 039 Teamwork Works! i Personnel !Operating iTot~l Comprehensive Servioes Ao~ A~ual Adopted FY2000 Biennial FY2000 Plannad Proposed Change From FY991 Adopted $96,023 $106,600 $107,8001 $85 8001 -19.5%; 3,167,888 3,540,100~ 3,637,300 2,772,800. -21.7% $3,265,877 $3,646,700 $3,745,1001 $2,858,900; -21 'Revenue 3,323,984 3,149,100 3246600 2365600 -24.9% Net Cost i ($58 108) $497,600 $498,500; $493,300~ -0.9% COMMUNITY CORRECTIONS · Criminal Justice Board will study adult drag court (cognitive) feasibility. · Day Reporting Center successfully started. · Studying criminal'justice information systems with DCJS grant. Studying recidivism of young adult population with state research grant. 6 040 Leading by Innovation i Personnel Community Corrections Services I FY2000 ~ Change FYi8 I FY~ i Biennial FY2000 . From FY~i Aatual L Ado~d,, i Planned Proposed I Adopted ~.r:~,529~: $70~,700i $710,s00~ ~73,s00 -4.5%~ [Operating 155,331! 257,500; 298,1001 307 9001 19.6%1 !Capital -100.0%i 6,897 33,400~: O! $627,757i $996,600! $1,008,7001 $9--~1,500~ iTotal -1.5%: iRevenue -1.5% ($25,550):~ $0i $367,900: inet Cost $0 0.0% Pretrial Services ~ FY2000 ,. Change FY98 FY99 Biennial FY2000 ~From FY99 Actual Adopted i Planned Proposed i Adopted : Personnel $201,541 $308,0001 $309,400 $252,300! -18.1%~ !Operating 63,184 38,7001 41,000 32,800~ -15.2%1 iCapital 0! _0i 0! 0i 0.0% !Total $264,725: $346,7001 $350,400 $285,100' -17.8%! !Revenue -17.8%1 Net Cost 267, 27._2.~ ..... 346,7001 341,800 2.~8_5_,_!00 -- ($2,546)~: $01 $8,600! 0.0% 7 041. Community Corrections Services Options Grant ~ FY2000 ~. Change ~ FY98 FY99 Biennial FY2000 From FY9g i Actual Adopted Planned Proposed Adopted ~-r-~;~-I---':--~~-! ....... ~'0~- ........ ~4~-:'[~-0'i ...... ~;~'2-~ .......... ~':~ iOperafing 7,.4671 7,900 8,100 7,000 -11.4% Capital O! 0.0% iTotal 0i 0~ $469791 $49,500 $49,9001 0~ $49,200 -0.6% Revenue 46, 9791 49,500 36~ 9001 49,200: -0.6% Net Cost $0~, $0 $13,000 $0 0.0% Model Program Domestic Violence Coordinator (CCS) , FY2000 ~ Change FY98 FY99 Biennial FY2000 From FY99! Aotual Adopted Planned Proposed l Adopted Personnel $37,746 $41,600 $41,8001 $44,100 6.0%1 8,649~ 5,800 5,600 6,700 15.5% !Operating Capital 2,949 Oi O! _0! 0.0%~ $49,343: $47,400 $47,400. $50,800 7.2% iRevenue 63,358 47,400 47,1001 50,800 7.2% iNet Cost ($14,015) $0 $300 $0 0.0% 8 VICTIM WITNESS Space needs are the only key issue: if more space is secured the state will pay for an additional caseworker. Helping Victims Vi~m/Witness Grant FY2 i Ch~,nge FY~ Biennial FY2000 From FY99 Adopted Planned Proposed Adopted FY98 Antual Personnel $170,3681 $244,200{ $244,900i $261,600 7.1% Operating 18,680i 22,500i 40,8001 26,100 16.0% i~pital 13,708i _.17,500 0! 0 -100.0%! $202,755i $284,200 $285,700; $287,70~' .......... ~-~; !Total i_R~_ ..?_.n..u_e .... 207,015! 237,8001 2___~_,_ _4~._0~ _.__.2...3..3 ~'.0..0..! ........ -~1:7_.%_! iNet Cost ($4,260)! $46,400 $41,300! $54,000: 16.4%~ 043 YOUTH SERVICES. · Community risk assessment and resources studies have been completed. · 6 Year Implementation Team Process has begtm... · Results from the Committee on the Future report this Spring .... · Youth Forum successfully held... Getting youth engaged... Youth Services Change FY2000 FY98 FY99 Biennial FY2000 From FY99 Antual Adopted Planned Proposed! Adopted Personnel $112,2521 $109,600! $110,100 $113,800: 3.8% Operating 11,533 29,700; 30,2001 33,200 11.8%. C~pit~l 0~, 0~ 01 0! N/A' $139,300 $140,3001 $147,0001 5.5%~ Total $123,785~ Revenue 123,7851 33,3007 31,100! 33,300~' . O: _0.~.: Net Cost $0:: $106,000 $109,200~, $113,700i 7.3%: 10 O44 Human Services Administration · Follow-up on citizens survey to address: - Access for the Handicapped to facilities and programs - Programs for Youth (after school) - -Programs for Seniors · Staff support for Youth Matters COLLABORATION FW8 Aotu~l Human Servioes Adminisl~ation Adopted Biennial Planned FY2000 Proposed Change From P~_er_~n__nel $189,529! $170,1001 $170,100 $174,900i 2.8% Operating 39,9731 31,100i 36,500 31,400 1.0% IC,,pi*-~ oi 4,000! o; 800 -80.0% !T'~ota--~ ~~-~' $205,200! ,206,600~ $207,100' 0.9% !Revenue 11 045 The End (f'mally!) THE HALE-BOPP COMET 12 O46 EMS Task Force Final Report March 10, 1999 "The Past" History of System · Burackcr Study- 1987 -Patient cam issues -Issues impacting thc volunteer system History of System · Enhancements of the Buracker Study · Established several staff positions · Efficient tiered-response system · Delivery of quality training programs · Development of cooperative working relationships · Evolution of a model EMS system 2 "The Present" Components of the Pre-Hospital EMS System · Bensley-Bermuda Volunteer Rescue Squad · Chesterfield Fire Department · Ettrick-Matoaca Volunteer Rescue Squad · Forest View Volunteer Rescue Squad · Manchester Volunteer Rescue Squad County Demographics · The County's population is increasing by approximately 3% per year · The fastest growing segment of the population is 60+ years of age · EMS calls have increased 19% since 1994 System Growth/Future Demands · Integrate system · Address Priority 1 BLS response times (<6 Minutes) · Construction of bond fire stations · Appointment of new staff positions · Address an increase in operational expenses EMS Study · Contract issued to David M. Griffith and Associates in August 1997 · Study initiated in November 1997 - Focus group sessions Presentation made to the Board of Supervisors in July 1998 - Mr. Ramsey appointed task force EMS Task Force · Task Force initially met September 2, 1998, with Mr. Ramsey in attendance - Charge WAS to review the recommendations of the consultant, determine their feasibility, and make recommendations based on that analysis - Charge WAS NOT to resolve the specifics of how each accepted issue was to be implemented 5 EMS Task Force Members · Deputy Chief Paul Mauger, Team Leader, Council Member · Mr. Rick Morrow, President of Forest View Rescue Squad, Council Chairman · Battalion Chief Gene Reams, EMS Director, Council Member · Dr. Alfred Gervin, Fire Department Medical Director · Mrs. Rose Wilson, Ettrick-Matoaca Rescue Squad EMS Task Force Members · Firefighter K.C. Sehlhorst, Fire Department · Mr. Warren Short, Forest View Rescue Squad · Mrs. Kathy Langley, Manchester Rescue Squad · Captain Bill Harding, Fire Department · Firefighter Jamie Thompson, Enon Volunteer Fire Department · Ms. Bonnie Hoskins, Bensley-Bermuda Rescue Squad 6 EMS Task Force Members · Mr. John Kirtley, Fire Department ALS Training Coordinator · Mr. Kip Causey, Bensley-Bermuda Rescue Squad, Council Member · Mr. J.C. Phillips, Citizen at Large, Council Member · Dr. Frank Ramsey, Chippenham/Johnston-Willis Hospital, Council Member · Mr. Ron Hall, Manchester Rescue Squad, Council Member EMS Task Force Members · Mr. Jesse Croom, President of Ettrick-Matoaca Rescue Squad, Council Member · Senior Captain Paul Newton, Co-Director Emergency Communications Center, Council Member · Major Buck Maddra, Police Department, Council Member · Ms. Linda Sayles, Southside Regional/John Randolph Hospitals, Council Member · Ms. Tonya Hyatt, Fire Department, Recording Secretary EMS Task Force · Members were divided into sub-groups: - Organization - Planning/Communications - Service Costs - Medical Direction/Training/Quality Assurance - Emergency Services EMS Task Force · Focus was on: - Patient care - Personnel safety - System integration and cooperation · Commitment was to work toward what was best for the system, not an individual agency's concerns or desires 8 TASK 47 Total Recommendation 6 Priority Recommendation EMS Task Force Priority Recommendations · Full component system integration · Continue the work already in progress 9 More Efficient, Cooperative Team Effort EMS Task Force Priority Recommendations Further explore the feasibility of establishing a revenue recovery system · Conduct internal/external study to answer questions and make a proposal · Bill for emergency service, subscription program, non- emergency transports and managed care 10 EMS Task Force Priority Recommendations Hire a full-time Operational Medical Director · A number of issues could be resolved and implemented more expeditiously if a single O.M.D. was utilized - Establish Protocols - System-wide Quality Assurance Issues - Research - Full Component System - If adopted, initiate the RFP process immediately EMS Task Force Priority Recommendations Designate the Fire Chief as the primary system-wide EMS Official · Constant in the system · Provide focus · Liaison between the EMS Advisory Council and the County Administrator - If adopted~ implement immediately 11 EMS Task Force Priority Recommendations Restructure the EMS Advisory Council - Serve as a strategic body for EMS system planning and management in cooperation with the Fire Chief · Many of the EMS Task Force recommendations give charge to the EMS Advisory Council on further exploring and implementing the recommendations - If adopted, implement immediately EMS Task Force Priority Recommendations Embark on a major volunteer recruitment and retention effort - Study to be conducted, has never been done - Funds are already appropriated for a study - If adopted, initiate the RFP process immediately 12 Summary · The commitment and focus needs to be on enhancing the system and successfully managing its growth · New staff positions - Operational Medical Director - Quality Assurance Coordinator with dedicated staff · Additional funding whether through revenue recovery or an increase of"in-kind" allocations to the participating agencies e:~ ~ ~ ~ · om r~ om · ~ 0 0 ~ 0 o C)o ~ , · · · · · · o o ~ (D *mi ell Z o W LU Z UJ U.I *mN *,mi · · · · · · · · · · 0 C)/ 0 © 0 · · · · · Meeting Date: CHESTERFIELD COUNTY ~ BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA March 10, 1999 Item Number: Page i of_L ~.~. Subject: Work Session on the County's 1999-2000 Community Development Block Grant and HOME Annual Plan County Administrator's Comments: CountyAdministrator: BoardAction Requested:,. Hold a work session on the County's 1999-2000 Community Development Block Grant and HOME Annual Plan and set a public hearing for March 24, 1999 at 7:45 p.m. to consider the County's 1999-2000 use of CDBG and HOME funds. Summary of Information: The County's Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) and HOME Annual Plan for 1999-2000 is required to be submitted to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) by May 15, 1999. A Proposal Review Committee has made its recommendation for the County Administrator on the County's 1999-2000 CDBG and HOME funding. The attached material is the Proposal Review Committee's recommendation and the recommendation from the County Administrator. A public hearing is scheduled for March 24, 1999. The Board of Supervisors is scheduled to adopt the Plan on April 14, 1999. After adoption the Plan will be submitted to HUD. HUD then has 45 days to review and approve the Plan. Preparer: ' Thomas Taylo~ Attachments: Yes ~ No Title: CDBG Director O83 · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · -_.. © = I I I I I I I I I I I ~1 I I I I I I I I I I I I ! I I I CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Meeting Date: March 10, 1999 Item Number: 8.A. Sub_iect: Nomination/Appointment of Preservation Committee Members County_ Administrator's Comments: County_ Administrator; ~ Board Action Requested: Nominate/Appoint the following to the Preservation Committee for a three year term. Summary_ of information: The Preservation Committee is appointed by the Board for a three year term. The members of this committee assist in the administration of the provisions of the Preservation Ordinance. The members of the Preservation Committee are appointed as At Large members and will serve from March 10, 1999 to March 12, 2002. Under the existing Rules of Procedure, appointments to boards and committees are nominated at one meeting and appointed at the subsequent meeting unless the Rules of Procedure are suspended by a unanimous vote of the Board members present. Nominees are voted on in the order if which they are nominated. Preparer: ~E. j~~__ Title: Director of P10lming Thomas C:DATA/AGENDA/1999/MAR 1099.3/GOK Attachments: Yes [~ No BOARD OF SUPERVISORS HARRY G. DANIEL CHAIRMAN DALE DISTRIC~ ARTHUR S. WARREN VICE CHAIRMAN CLOVER HILL DISTRICT J. L. McHALE, III BERMUDA DISTRICT RENNY BUSH HUMPHREY MATOACA DISTRICT EDWARD B. BARBER MIDLOTHIAN DISTRICT CHESTERFIELD COUNTY P.O. Box 40 CHESTERFIELD, VIRGINIA 23832-0040 (804) 748-1050 LANE B. RAMSEY COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR MEMORANDUM: TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Members of the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors Thomas E. Jacobson, Director of Planning March 1, 1999 Nominations for the Chesterfield County Preservation Committee The Preservation Committee members are appointed At Large to serve a three (3) year term. The current term expired on March 9, 1999. The following members have agreed to be reappointed to serve a'3 year term from March 10, 1999 to March 12, 2002: Mary Ellen Howe, James V. Daniels, J. Carl Morris, G. W. "Skip" Wallace, Bryan Walker, Douglas Woolfolk, John V. Cogbill Providing a FIRST CHOICE community through excellence in public service. 103 CHESTERFIELD COUNTh BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 3 Meeting Date: March 10~ 1999 Item Number: $. ~. Subject: Streetlight Installation Approvals County. Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: This item requests Board approval of Streetlight Installations in the Bermuda, Matoaca, and Midlothian Districts and reports on streetlights that have received administrative approval based on qualifying petitions and no associated installation costs. Summary of Information: Streetlight requests from individual citizens or civic groups are received in the Department of Environmental Engineering. Staff requests cost quotations from Virginia Power for each request received. When the quotations are received, staff re-examines each request and presents them at the next available regular meeting of the Board of Supervisors for consideration. Staff provides the Board with an evaluation of each request based on the following criteria: 1. Streetlights should be located at intersections; There should be a minimum average of 600 vehicles per day (VPD) passing the requested location if it is an intersection, or 400 VPD if the requested location is not an intersection; Petitions are required and should include 75% of residents within 200 feet of the requested location and if at an intersection, a majority of those residents immediately adjacent to the intersection. CONTINUED NEXT PAGE · a~c~ M. Mc.,F~sh, P.F~. Title: Director, Environmental Engineering Attachments: Yes --~No 104 CHESTERFIELD COUNT~ BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 2 of 3 Summary of Information: (Continued) Cost quotations from Virginia Power are valid for a period of 60 days. Thc Board, upon presentation of the cost quotation may approve, defer, or deny the expenditure of funds for the streetlight installation. If the expenditure is approved, staff authorizes Virginia Power to install thc streetlight. A denial will cancel the project and staff will so notify the requestor. A deferral will be brought before the Board again when specified. BERMUDA DISTRICT: Hidden Creek Court and Walthall Creek Drive, Walthall Creek Subdivision Cost to install light: $1,834.33 Meets minimum criteria Howlett Line Drive, northwest comer of 13919, Walthall Creek Subdivision Cost to install both lights: $ 246.32 Does not meet minimum criteria for intersection Howlett Line Drive, northwest comer of 13901, Walthall Creek Subdivision Cost to install both lights: $ 265.69 Does not meet minimum criteria for intersection Bermuda District Streetlight Funds Balance Forward $14,240 Requested Effective Expenditure Remaining Balance $1,834 $12,406 $246 $12,159 $266 $11,894 CONTINUED NEXT PAGE CHESTERFIELD COUNT~ BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Summary. of Information: (Continued) Page 3 of 3 MATOACA DISTRICT: * Candlelamp Lane, Install two lights, one at 9801 and one at 9811, and upgrade the existing light in the cul-de-sac from 5000 lumens to 8000 lumens Cost to install 2 lights and complete 1 upgrade: $1,318.06 None of these requests meet minumum criteria for intersection or vehicles per day Matoaca District Streetlight Funds Requested Balance Forward Expenditure $31,637 $1,318 MIDLOTHIAN DISTRICT: Effective Remaining Balance $30,319 Robious Road entrance to the James River High School Fieldhouse Cost to install light: $1,810.74 Meets minimum criteria Midlothian District Streetlight Funds Requested Balance Forward Expenditure $57,784 $1,811 Effective Remaining Balance $55,973 ADMINISTRATIVELY APPROVED STREETLIGHTS: The following streetlight requests have been administratively approved on the bases of qualified petitions and no costs associated with their installation: Bermuda District: Wood Duck Lane, north cul-de-sac Lewis Road, vicinity of 13501 Harrowgate Road, vicinity of Grace Lutheren Church Dale District: Crossvine Road and Shamrock Drive Matoaca District: Church Road and Hickory Road Church Road, vicinity of 18704 Church Road, vicinity of 18800 STREETLIGHT REQUEST Bermuda District Request Received: June 15, 1998 Estimate Requested: June 15, 1998 Estimate Received: February 18, 1999 Days Estimate Outstanding: 248 Cost to install light: $1,834.33 NAME OF REQUESTOR: Sidney Aron, Secretary Walthall Creek Homeowners Association ADDRESS: 1508 Clear Springs Place Colonial Heights, VA 23834 REQUESTED LOCATION IS THE INTERSECTION OF: Hidden Creek Court and Walthall Creek Drive REQUEST IS NOT AT AN INTERSECTION. REQUESTED LOCATION IS: POLICY CRITERIA: Intersection: Vehicles per Day: Petition: Qualified Qualified Qualified Staff or Requestor Comments: Requestor states: "We are requesting a pole and light at this intersection because it is a school bus stop. It is very dark when the school bus picks up in the morning which is unsafe for children." 107 Strew?Light Request Map 'March 1~ 1999 17ti~ ttu~ i~ a copyrigigt~ protltu~ of ~ ant~rf~ County atS O~. Street Light Legend existing light requested light 1'= 721.31f~et This map shows citizen requested streetlight installations in relation to existing streetlights. Existing streetlight information was obtained from the Chesterfield County Environmental Engineering Department. 10S STREETLIGHT REQUEST Bermuda District Request Received: June 15, 1998 Estimate Requested: June 15, 1998 Estimate Received: February 18, 1999 Days Estimate Outstanding: 248 Cost to install light: $ 246.32 NAME OF REQUESTOR: Sidney Aron, Secretary Walthall Creek Homeowners Association ADDRESS: 1508 Clear Springs Place Colonial Heights, VA 23834 ~ REQUESTED LOCATION IS THE INTERSECTION OF: REQUEST IS NOT AT AN INTERSECTION. REQUESTED LOCATION IS: Howlett Line Drive, northwest corner of 13919 POLICY CRITERIA: Intersection: Vehicles per Day: Petition: Not Qualified, location is not an intersection Qualified Qualified Staff or Requestor Comments: Requestor states: "There are many children, walkers, and bicyclists in Walthall Creek. This area is very dark and a hazard to pedestrians and drivers" Staff notes that this installation is located at the south end of a roadside barrier. 109 STREETLIGHT REQUEST Bermuda District Request Received: June 15, 1998 Estimate Requested: June 15, 1998 Estimate Received: February 18, 1999 Days Estimate Outstanding: 248 Cost to install light: $ 265.69 NAME OF REQUESTOR: Sidney Aron, Secretary Walthall Creek Homeowners Association ADDRESS: 1508 Clear Springs Place Colonial Heights, VA 23834 ~ REQUESTED LOCATION IS THE INTERSECTION OF: REQUEST IS NOT AT AN INTERSECTION. REQUESTED LOCATION IS: Howlett Line Drive, southwest corner of '1 $90'1 POLICY CRITERIA: Intersection: Vehicles per Day: Petition: Not Qualified, location is not an intersection Qualified Qualified Staff or Requestor Comments: Requestor states: "There are many children, walkers, and bicyclists in Walthall Creek. This area is very dark and a hazard to pedestrians and drivers" Staff notes that this installation is located at the north end of a roadside barrier. 110 StreF'Light Request Map March 10 1999 EDGE Street Light Legend existing light requested light This map shows citizen requested streetlight installations in relation to existing streetlights. b2risting streetlight information was obtained from the Chesterfield County Environmental Engineering Department. 111 STREETLIGHT REQUEST Matoaca District Request Received: February 3, 1999 Estimate Requested: February 3, 1999 Estimate Received: February 11, 1999 Days Estimate Outstanding: 8 Cost to install 2 lights and upgrade an existing light: $1,318.06 NAME OF REQUESTOR: Rick Hall ADDRESS: 9811 Candlelamp Lane Chesterfield, VA 23832 REQUESTED LOCATION IS THE INTERSECTION OF: REQUESTS ARE NOT AT AN INTERSECTION. REQUESTED LOCATIONS ARE: 1. Candlelamp Lane, southwest corner of 9801 2. Candlelamp Lane, southwest corner of 9811 3. Upgrade the existing light in the cul-de-sac of Candlelamp Lane from 5000 lumens to 8000 lumens POLICY CRITERIA: Intersection: Not Qualified, none of the locations are at an intersection. Vehicles per Day: Not Qualified, less than 400 VPD at all locations Petition: Qualified Staff or Requestor Comments: Requestor states: "We, the residents of Candlelamp East Subdivision request the installation of additonal lighting between Spring Run Road and the one existing light at the end of Candlelamp Lan:e. This request is due to a growing problem of property damage and the non-resident use of Candlelamp Lane's dark and remote stretch of road as a parking area during the late hours of night. "Recently, destruction of mailboxes was again reported to the police. Also vehicles leaving ruts and trash along the road's edge have been the elements creating this request. "This is a unified request by the homeowners of this neighborhood in developing a safer, more peaceful subdivision to live in." Stree~ Light Request Map March 10, 1999 t~ ~ Count~ atS O~e. Street Light Legend ~ misting light ~ requested light This map shows citizen requested streetlight installations in relation to existing streetlights. Existing streetlight information was obtained from the Chesterfield County Environmental Engineering Department. 113 STREETLIGHT REQUEST Midlothian District Request Received: January 21, 1999 Estimate Requested: January 21, 1999 Estimate Received: February 24, 1999 Days Estimate Outstanding: 34 Cost to install light: $1,810.74 NAME OF REQUESTOR: James River High School PTA ADDRESS: 3700 James River Road Midlothian, VA 23112 REQUESTED LOCATION IS THE INTERSECTION OF: Robious Road entrance to the James River High School Fieldhouse REQUEST IS NOT AT AN INTERSECTION. REQUESTED LOCATION IS: POLICY CRITERIA: Intersection: Vehicles per Day: Petition: Staff or Requestor Comments: Requestor states: Qualified Qualified Qualified "This intersection is unlighted but sees lots of activity at night due to events at the fieldhouse. A light at this location would make approaching it much safer." 114 Strew. Light Request Map March 10, 1999 ~l~i~ rnap i~ a eopyrighted product of Street Light Legend ~ existing light ~ requested light This map shows citizen requested streetlight installations in relation to existing streetlights. Existing streetlight information was obtained from the Chesterfield County Environmental Engineering Department. 115 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS, AGENDA Date: March 10, 1999 Item NUmber: 8. c. 1. Page 1 of 2 Subject: Contract Award for the James River Industrial Center Industrial Access Project County_ Administrator's Comments' County_ Administrator: Board Action Requested: Center Industrial Access Project. The Board is requested to award a contract for the James River Industrial Summary. of information: In July 1998, the Board authorized staffto advertise a road construction contract for the James River Industrial Center Industrial Access Project. The project was advertised on January 30, 1999. Bids were received on February 22, 1999. Stanley Construction submitted the low bid of $375,295. The bid is approximately twenty-two percent below the County's estimate. The bid results are listed on Attachment 'A.' The project budget is shown on Attachment Recommendation: Construction. Staff recommends the Board award a construction contract to Stanley District: Bermuda Preparer: R.J. McCracken Agen3 81 Attachments: Ye Title: Director of Transportation # 116 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 2 of 2 Meeting Date: March 10. 1999 Numb~tr Bud,qet and Manaqement Comments: As indicated by the attached chart, the total budgeted appropriation for this project is $1,400,000. The sources for that appropriation are: $5,000 in Transfer from the General Fund, $450,000 in anticipated VDOT reimbursement, and $945,000 in developer contributions. The current unencumbered/unspent balance is $1,348,119; therefore, sufficient appropriations are available to award the construction contract in the amount of $375,295. Preparer: Rebecca T. Dickson 117 JAMES RIVER INDUSTRIAL CENTER INDUSTRIAL ACCESS PROJECT FEBRUARY 22, 1999, BID RESULTS CONTRACTOR TOTAL BID 1. Stanley Construction 2. Sanford Brothers 3. Blakemore Construction 4. Bishop & Settle 5. Interstate Construction 6. Richard L. Crowder Construction 7. William T. Cantrell 8. F.G. Pruitt 9. Shoosmith Brothers, Inc. 10. S.W. Rogers 11. J.H. Martin Contractors 12. B.P. Short 13. Shirley Contracting 14. J.E. Liesfield Contractor $ 375,295 $ 385,250 $ 387,000 $ 394,000 $ 427,325 $ 431,000 $ 457,204 $ 485,200 $ 486,211 $ 495,000 $ 498,352 $ 536,961 $ 544,650 $ 547,198 ATTACHMENT A 118 PROJECT CONSTRUCTION BUDGET Eligible Ineligible Bid 9226,750 9148,5z~5 Construction Contingency 931,000 922,000 Construction Administration 913,595 0 Construction Engineering 928,560 919,040 Total 9299,905 9189,585 FUNDING SOURCES Eligible Ineligible Preliminary Engineering 0 Developer O* Bond 0 N/A 0 Construction 9226,750 VDOT unmatched 9148,545 Developer Construction 931,000 VDOT unmatched 922,000 Developer Contingency Construction 913,595 VDOT unmatched 0 Administration Construction 928,560 VDOT unmatched 919,040 Developer Engineering APPROPRIATIONS/TRANSFERS Jul 29, 1998 95,O00 Industrial Access Account Aug 26, 1998 9450,000 Anticipated VDOT Reimbursements Aug 26, 1998 9945,000 Anticipated Developer Reimbursements Total 91,400,000 *Developer paid ATTACHMENT B JAMES RIVER INDUSTRIAl. CENTER W CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page, 1 of 1 Meeting Date: March 10, 1999 Item Number: 8.C.2.a. Subject: Request Permission to Install a Proposed Concrete Pad Within a Variable Width Water and Sewer Easement County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors grant A/H-Sigma Richmond, L.L.C. permission to install a concrete pad within a variable width water and sewer easement; subject to the execution of a license agreement. Summary_ of Information: A/H-Sigma Richmond, L.L.C. has requested permission to install a concrete pad within a variable width water and sewer easement, as shown on the attached plan. This request has been reviewed by staff and approval is recommended. District: Clover Hill Preparer: John W. Harmon Attachments: No Title: Riqht of Way Manaqer 121 VICINITY SKETCH REQUEST PERMISSION TO ..~STALL A PRCPOSED CONCRETE PAD , 2HIN A VARIABLE WIDTH WATER ADN SE~ER EASEMENT A/H-SIGMA RICH~OND LLC 122 COU Il. CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Meeting Date: March 10, 1999 Item Number: 8.C.2.b. Subject: Request Permission for a Portion of an Existing Dwelling to Encroach Within a Variable Width Drainage and Sewer Easement County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: BoardActionRequested: Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors grant Mark L. Johnson and Tina L. Johnson permission to have a portion of an existing dwelling encroach within a variable width drainage and sewer easement; subject to the execution of a license agreement. Summary_ of Information: Mark L. Johnson and Tina L. Johnson have requested permission for a portion of an existing dwelling to encroach within a variable width drainage and sewer easement as shown on the attached plat. This request has been reviewed by staff and approval is recommended. District: Clover Hill Preparer: ~ ~J. ~,-~ John W. Harmon Attachments: Yes No Title: Riqht of Way Manaqer VICINITY SKETCH O?° "70 AREA TO BE LICENSED ,Z_zp:t- ~ ~ t3L,L:1C~ "C", PH,~. ~ -~-.~, - Date: / ..... Scale:/"-~ Job · PLANNERS · ARCHITECTS · ENGINEERS · SURVEYORS · 501 Branchway Road · Suile 100, Richmond, Virginia 23236 · 794-0571 · Fax 794-2635 11038 Lakeridge Parkway, · Suite 1 · Ashland, Virginia 23005 · (804) 550-2888 · Fax (804) 550-2057 126 Meeting Date: March 1 O, 1999 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Item Number: 8.C.3. Subject: Request for a Permit to Stage a Fireworks Display at the Sunday Park Peninsula of Brandermill on July 4, 1999 County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Summary. of Information: Mr. Mike Divita and Ms. Dianne Sindelir, of the Brandermill Community Association, have requested permission from the Board to stage a fireworks display at the Sunday Park Peninsula at Brandermill on July 4, 1999 at dusk. Mr. W. G. Bulifant, III, of Dominion Fireworks has previously conducted similar displays elsewhere in the County and will personally discharge the fireworks. Mr. Divita and Ms. Sindelir have submitted evidence of a fireworks liability insurance policy in the amount of $2,000,000 which names the County as an additional insured. Lt. Randy Picardat, of the Fire Marshal's Office, has reviewed the request and has indicated that the proposed display meets all applicable criteria under the Fire Prevention Code. Steven L. Micas 1205:43819.1 Attachments: [~ Yes INo I# I Application for Fireworks Display (Print or Type All Information) Date of Application: February 3, 1999 Event Name: Brandermill's Fourth of July Parad~Date: Time of Fireworks: 9: 00 p.m. / dusk Rain Date: Event Location: Sunday Park Peninsula in Brandermill Shooting site/Display area: Sunday Park beach area (include map) Sponsoring Organization: Brandermill Community As~qc~i af Person In Charge of Event: Mike Divita/Dena Sindelir Mailing Address: 3001 East Boundary Terrace City: Midlothian State: VA Work Phone:' 744-1035 July 4, 1999 __Zip: 23112 HomePhone: 744-3946 Person Coordinating Fireworks: Mike Divita/Dena Sindelir (for the sponsor) Mailing Address: 3001 East Boundary Terrace City: Midlothian State: VA Work Phone: 744-1035 __Zip: 23112 Home Phone: 744- 6022 Company Responsible for Shooting: Dominion Fireworks Mailing Address: P.O. Box 3015 City: Petersburg Work Phone: 733-6792 Shooters Name: State: VA Zip:, 23805 Atler Hours: 452-0595 W. G. Bulifant, III Note: 1. 2. 3. Date: Attach a list of fireworks to be used in the display. Attach a copy of the certificate of insurance. Include a site drawing noting discharge site, spectator viewing area, parking, and any nearby structures. Should you have any questions, call the Fire and Life Safety Division at 748-1426. Return application to: Chesterfield Fire Department Fire and Life Safety P. O. Box 40 Chesterfield, VA 23832 Applicant's Signature: .~r,~. ,~ PfintName: ""~"~x J./~, ~ /~ ! il:l- ; l/J4 . .,(,~ ~ 4 i t~, .~, _ ,,~r f,,c. ****************************************************************************** (office use only) Remarks: ~ ~ ~/c ,' ~ ~ ~a ~ g~e.r, aa~ Site suitable for display pending County Attomey and Board of Supervisors approval. Site unsuitable. Fire Official~~~~ Event Representative: Date: Date: PRODUCER INSURED Britton-Gallagher & Assoc. 6240 SOM Center Rd. Cleveland, oH 44139L2985 Dominion Fireworks, Inc. P. O. Box 3015 Petersburg VA 23805 216-248-4711 THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AMEND, EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW. COMPANIES AFFORDING COVERAGE COMPANY A Nobel Insurance Co. COMPANY B COMPANY C COMPANY D THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED, NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES. LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS. TYPE OF INSURANCE POLICY NUMBER GENERAL LIABILITY EXVAO00103 COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY __ CLAIMS MADE L~ OCCUR OWNER'S & CONTRACTOR'S PROT AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY ANY AUTO ALL OWNED AUTOS SCHEDULED AUTOS HIRED AUTOS NON-OWNED AUTOS GARAGE LIABILITY ANY AUTO EXCESS LIABILITY UMBRELLA FORM OTHER THAN UMBRELLA FORM WORKERS COMPENSATION AND EMPLOYERS' LIABILITY THE PROPRIETOR/ PARTNERS/EXECUTIVE OFFICERS ARE: OTHER EXVA000102 EXVAO01161 POLICY EFFECTIVE DATE (MM/DD/YY) 7/15/98 7/15~98 , ~ 7/t.~i98 POLICY EXPIRATION DATE (M M/DD/~7 7/15/99~/ 7/15/99 7/15/99 / LIMITS DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS/LOCATIONSfVEHICLES/SPECIAL ITEMS DATE: JULY 4,1999 ADDITIONAL LOCATION: BRg2q-DEI~III~ LAKE ( CHESTERFIF_~D, VA. ) GENERAL AGGREGATE $ 2000000 PRODUCTS - COMPIOP AGG $ Z000000 PERSONAL & ADV INJURY $ 1000000 '-'ACH OCCURRENCE FIRE DAMAGE (Any one fire) MED EXP (Any one person) 1000000 50000 5OO0 COMBINED SINGLE LIMIT 10O0O00 BODILY INJURY (Per person) BODILY INJURY {Per accident) PROPERTY DAMAGE AUTO ONLY - EA ACCIDENT EACH ACCIDENT AGGREGATE EACH OCCURRENCE $ 4000000 AGGREGATE $ 4000000 WC STATU- OTH- TORY LIMITS ER EL EACH ACCIDENT EL DISEASE - POLICY LIMIT EL DISEASE - EA EMPLOYEE INSURED:#1 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY, VIRGINIA SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE BRANDERMILL CO~Vi~ITY ASSOCIATION 3001 BOUNDARY TERRACE EXPIRATION. DATE THEREOF, THE ISSUING COMPANY WILL ENDEAVOR TO MAIL ]Vji[~ :. ,,. ,., 30 DAYS WRITTEN NOTICE TO THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER NAMED TO THE LEFT, ~LOr~IAN~. VA. 23112 .: 'BI-Jr: FAILURE TO MAI~/~UCH NOTICE SHALL IMPOSE NO OBLIGATION OR LIABILITY ~ ~ ~ OF ANY KIND UJ~N THE COMpANy, ITS AGENTS OR~ REPRESENTATIVES. BRANDERMILL. JULY 4,1998-99 D.R. HUNTER 15' TRUCK 160 3 iNCH 8O 4 iNCH 25 5 INCH 15 6 INCH 100 3 INCH 50 2.5 INCH FINALE FINALE 1999 add 40 3 inch 1999 add 20 4 inch 1999 add 10 5 inch 1999 add 10 6 inch 1999 add 200 salutes w/tails (This will include 100 from 1998) ADDITIONAL SALUTES IN FINALE: 208 BOX SALUTES W/TAILS iNSURANCE LIMITS: FIVE MILLION TOTAL COST: $7,000.00 NOTE: ALL SHELLS ASSORTED BRAN.DERMILL Comrnun~ty Association SWIFT CREEK RESERVOIR Fireworks to be displayed from this location BIKE TRAILS Meeting Date: CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA March 10~ 1999 Item Number: Page I of I 8 .C.4. Subiect: Contractual Agreement with Youth Matters and Appropriation of Grant Funds County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: The Board is requested to authorize the County Administrator to execute the agreement with Youth Matters and to appropriate the grant funds. Summary of Information: Youth Matters is an initiative of the Greater Richmond Chamber of Commerce, funded by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. Their priorities are to help youth reach their full potential by improving educational achievement, developing stronger families, and encouraging stronger neighborhoods. This agreement will provide $20,000 for the calendar year 1999 to match. $20,000 funded by the County to expand programs at the Dupont Square Learning Center and at other locations within targeted areas. The Extension Service will coordinate these programs. Continued funding of this program, both the grant as well as the local share, will be included in t~FY2000 proposed budget. f Rl'~hard A. Nunn~lly / / Attachments: Yes THIS AGRF. F. MENT ~nade as of the __ day of , 1999, by and between the COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD, VIRGINIA ("County"), a political subdivision of the Commonwealth of Virginia; and YOUTH MATTERS, an initiative of the Greater Richmond Chamber of Commerce. W!!ISESSETH_: WHEREAS, YOUTH MATTERS is a foundation sponsored by the Greater Richmond Chamber of Commerce whose primary purpose is to help youth reach their full potential by, among other methods, improving educational achievement, developing stronger families, and encouraging stronger neighborhoods; and WHEREAS, the County shares YOUTH MATTERS' goal of assisting youth in the community and through the County's Department of Extension Services has established community-based programs designed to achieve these shared goals; and WHEREAS, YOUTH MATTERS wishes to support the County's initiatives in the community; NOW THEREFORE, the parties agree as follows: 1. YOUTH MATTERS hereby grants to the County the sum of Twenty Thousand Dollars ($20,000.00) ("Grant"). 2. In consideration of the Grant, the County agrees as follows: a. To establish and support a position of Community Liaison to facilitate the coordination of services between targeted neighborhoods in the County and local government, business and community partners; 1 o 0600:43950.1 Co eo To develop and utilize a community needs assessment to identify assets and needs in the community; To facilitate the delivery of services to targeted communities as determined jointly by the County and YOUTH MATI'ERS; To meet regularly with YOUTH MATTERS staff to assess the progress of programs initiated under this Agreement; To provide regularly written reports to YOUTH MATTERS which shall include: (1) the number of youth served by programs initiated under this Agreement; (2) the number of volunteers involved in programs initiated under this Agreement; (3) the number of families involved in programs initiated under this Agreement; and (4) other information as mutually agreed to by the County and YOUTH MATTERS. The County's obligations under this Agreement shall continue only for so long as the Grant is sufficient to support such obligations, or the Grant is renewed. YOUTH MATTERS and the County agree that the validity and construction of this Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the Commonwealth of Virginia. This Agreement contains all the terms and conditions agreed upon by the parties hereto. 2 6. This Agreement shall not be modified unless in writing and signed by the parties hereto. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the County and YOUTH MATTERS have executed this Agreement as of the date first written above. COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD, VIRGINIA Approved as to form: By: Lane B. Ramsey County Administrator Michael S. J. Chernau Senior Assistant County Attorney YOUTH MATTERS By: Executive Director 0600:43950.1 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of Meeting Date: March 10. 1999 Item Number: 8.C.5.a. Subject: Recognition of Lieutenant Vaughan E. Culbreath Upon His Retirement After 25 Years of Dedicated Service to Chesterfield County County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Adoption of attached resolution. (Consent Item) Summary_ of Information; Stepher~ A. Elswick Yes I I No Attachments: Title: Chief of Depi~rtmen~ Resolution of the BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CHESTERFIELD COUNTY RECOGNIZING LIEUTENANT VAUGHAN E. CULBREATH UPON HIS RETIREMENT WHEREAS, Vaughan E. Culbreath began his public service with the County as a firefighter in the Fire Department on March 1, 1974, and has faithfully served Chesterfield County for twenty-five years; and WHEREAS, by providing quality public service, Vaughan E. Culbreath has symbolized the type of employee Chesterfield County seeks; and WHEREAS, Vaughan E. Culbreath's desire to do a good job has been a primary factor that has permitted him to perform at a high level while always striving for excellence; and WHEREAS, Vaughan E. Culbreath, displayed a caring attitude toward all of his customers, often going out of his way to help those in need, and demonstrated excellent teamwork skills by always being available to assist his co-workers, volunteers and the citizens of Chesterfield County. WHEREAS, Vaughan E. Culbreath has been effective in working with all groups, including co-workers, volunteers and the citizens of Chesterfield County. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors publicly recognizes the contributions ofVaughan E. Culbreath, expresses the appreciation of all residents for his service to the County, their congratulations upon his retirement, and their best wishes for a long and happy retirement. AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that a copy of this resolution be presented to Vaughan E. Culbreath and that this resolution be permanently recorded among the papers of this Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County, Virginia. Meeting/Date: CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA March 10, 1999 Item Number: Page ~ of z 8.C.5.b. Subject: Recognition of '~ational Library Week" County Administrator's Comments: CountyAdministrator: BoardAction Requested: Consent of Resolution Summary of Information: WHEREAS, our nation's public, school and academic libraries provide all people with books, computers, videocassettes, audio tapes and other resources to enrich their lives; and WHEREAS, librarians protect the right of all Americans to read, learn and connect to information representing all points of view; and WHEREAS, libraries are vital to building a nation of readers and creating a lifelong love of reading among our children and youth; and WHEREAS, millions of Americans rely on libraries for their only access to computers and the Internet, allowing them to get connected to our global society; and WHEREAS, librarians provide the essential support and education needed by children, teenagers and adults alike in their search for knowledge, information and entertainment; and Preparer: Robert E. Wagenknecht ~ Yes No Attachments: Director of Library I# 134 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page z of z Summary of Information: (Continued) WHEREAS, Libraries and library supporters nationwide are celebrating "National Library Wee~'with the theme "Read! Learn! Connect! @ the Library". NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that Chesterfield County proclaims April 11-17, 1999,'~ational Library Wee~'in Chesterfield County, Virginia and encourages all people to "Read! Learn! Connect!" by exploring the riches available at our libraries; AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that a copy of this resolution be presented to director of library services, Robert E. Wagenknecht, and that this resolution be permanently recorded among the papers of this Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County, Virginia. '135 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page ~ of ~ Meetin~ Date: March 10, 1999 Item Number: 8.C.6. Subject: Approval of Utility Contract for Birkdale Onsite Trunk Sewer Phase III - Contract Number 98-0379 County_ Administrator's Comments: Connty Administrator: Board Action Requested: Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors approve this contract and authorize the County Administrator to execute any necessary documents. Summary of Information: This project includes 1,669 L.F.± of 15" oversized wastewater lines. The developer is required to have an 8" wastewater line to serve his development, therefore, staff has requested the wastewater line be oversized to provide service to adjoining properties. In accordance with the ordinance, the developer is entitled to refunds for the cost of oversizing the wastewater lines. Developer: Contractor: Milhaus Corporation Piedmont Construction Company, Inc. Contract Amount: Estimated Total - Total Estimated County Cost: Wastewater (Oversizing) Estimated Developer Cost Code: (Refund thru connections - Oversizing) District: Matoaca $81,499.35 $9,606.50 $71,892.85 5N-572VO-E4C Preparer: Title: Assistant Director Attachments: Yes No # 136 CONTRACT NUMBER 98-0379 HULL U.S. ROUT~ 560 ~0,4D TH I S PROJECT lOYAL VICINITY SCALE: l" = MAP 2,000' BIRKDALE ONSITE TRUNK SEWER - PHASE III 137 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page ~ of ~ Meeting Date: March 10, 1999 Item Number: 8.c. 7. Subject: Approval of Revised Sewer Contract for Harrowgate Place Off- Site Sewer Extension - Contract Number 98-0164 County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors approve this revised contract and authorize the County Administrator to execute any necessary documents. Summary_ of Information: Due to an unexpected increase in offsite and oversizing costs because of rock excavation, this contract has been revised to reflect a cash refund for the oversizing and additional work. In accordance with the ordinance, the County may permit a cash refund for the oversizing and additional work. Typically, cash refunds are permitted in situations where the developer is not able to generate enough connection fees to recoup the amount of refunds he is eligible to receive for the oversizing and additional work, therefore, staff is recommending that a cash refund be permitted. Preparer: ~' Title: Assistant Director Attachments: Yes No 138 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page ~ of ~ Summary of Information: (Continued) This project includes the extension of 2,696 L.F.± of 18", 1,139 L.F.± of 15" and 448 L.F.± of 8" off-site wastewater improvements. The developer is required to have an 8" wastewater line to serve his development. Staff has requested that the wastewater lines be oversized to provide service to the adjoining properties. In accordance with the ordinance, the developer is entitled to refunds for the cost of the additional work, oversizing and off-site improvements. Developer: Contractor: Savage & Lennon, Inc. RMC Contractors, Inc. Contract Amount: Estimated Total - Total Estimated County Cost: Wastewater (Oversizing) Wastewater (Off-Site) Wastewater (Additional Work Estimated Developer Cost Code: (Cash refund - Oversizmng and additional work) (Refund thru connections - Off-Site) District: Bermuda $283,366.60 $37,612.01 $78,393.50 $3,570.00 $163,790.49 5N-572WO-E4C 5N-572VO-E4D CONTRACT NUMBER 98-016q 5 ' SCN~ O~ ~ ~ ~ HARROWGATE PLACE OFF-SITE SEWER EXTENSION 140 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Meeting Date: Subject: March 10~__1999 Item Number: 8.C.8.a. Approval of the Purchase of Right of Way and Easement for Spring Run Road Improvements from Larry E. Newcomb County_ Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Staff requests that the Board of Supervisors approve the purchase of right of way and easement for Spring Run Road Improvements and authorize the County Administrator to execute the deed. Summary_ of Information: Staff requests that the Board of Supervisors approve the purchase of 0.041 acres of right of way and a 10' Bell-Atlantic easement for $1,000.00, for improvements to Spring Run Road in conjunction with development of the Spring Run Road Elementary School. Approval is recommended. District: Matoaca Preparer: c~. ~,-A~ 7~.~ John N. Harmon Attachments: Yes No Title: Riqht of Way Manaqer 141 VICINITY SKETCH APPROVAL OF THE PURCHASE OF RIGHT OF WAY AND EASEME~ FOR SPRING RUN ROAD IMPROVEMENTS FROM LARRY E NEWCOMB )<% .~ER£ORD CHURCH ,DOWNS J ~-L 14~ 1 ELLIOTT, WILLIAM T. & SALLIE D, LOT 34 LARRY E. NEWCOMB DEED BOOK 2126 PAOE 1791 13650 SPRING RUN ROAD PIN 730-664-4078 LOT 35 DEDICATION .AREA: 1797.764 Sq.Ft. .041 Acre BOUNDARY INFORMATION AS SHOWN WAS TAKEN FROM. PLAT BY LANDMARK SURVEYORS, INC. DATED 9-16-86, REV 9-26-86. z / · 3664668.8283 ,/w -t664671.7541 L. PROPOSED 10 BE_LL/__. /,, ~ ~ ~ ~ 15' PRESCRIPTIVE m ~ ~ ~ ~EMENT FROM C/L ~ ~ C/L AS ESTABLISHED BY PROPER~ p~ ~ OF ~NDMARK SURV~S T R/W LINE ESTABLISHED BY TIMMONS APRIL, 1977. NOTE: 15' PRESCRIPTIVE EASEMENT IS BASED ON FIELD SURVEY. PLAT SHOWING A STRIP OF LAND BE ,DEDICATED TO THE COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD AND A PROPOSED 10' BELL ATLANTIC EASEMENT ACROSS THE PROPERTY OF LARRY E. NEWCOMB LOCATED IN THE MATOACA DISTRICT OF CHESTERFIELD COUNTY, VIRGINIA SCALE:~ ·I 20 , AU~ ~ROC~OUGH & ASSOCIATES, LL.P. DATE: dUNE 26, i998 PO BOX aSO0 CHESTER VA. REV: dULY t4l t998 CS0-486! 97-36A 143 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Meeting Date: March 10, 1999 Item Number: 8.C.8.b. Subject: Approval of the Purchase of Right of Way and Easement for Spring Run Road Improvement from William T. and Sallie D. Elliott County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Staff requests that the Board of Supervisors approve the purchase of right of way and easement for Spring Run Road Improvement and authorize the County Administrator to execute the deed. Summary of Information: Staff requests that the Board of Supervisors approve the purchase of 0.305 acres of right of way and a 10' Bell-Atlantic easement for $5,647.50, for improvements to Spring Run Road in conjunction with development of the Spring Run Road Elementary School. Approval is recommended. District: Matoaca John W. Harmon Attachments: Yes No Title: Riqht of Way Manager VICINITY SKETCH APPROVAL OF THE PURCHASE OF RIGHT OF WAY AND EASEMENT FOR SPRING RUN ROAD IMPROVEMENT FROM WILLIAM T & SALLIE D ELLIOTT N 145 -'r' -i'- a3t:3, fl fl II fl 146 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Meeting Date: March 10, 1999 Item Number: Subject: Acceptance of a Parcel of Land for Revised Hopkins Road Extended from Miles & Wells County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors accept the conveyance of a parcel of land containing 3.20 more or less for revised Hopkins Road Extended from Miles & Wells, and authorize the County Administrator to execute the necessary deed. Summary of Information: It is the policy of the County to acquire right of way whenever possible through development to meet the ultimate road width as shown on the County Thoroughfare Plan. The dedication of this parcel conforms to that plan, and will decrease the right of way costs for road improvements when constructed. District: Bermuda Harmon Attachments: Yes No Title: Riqht of Way Manager ¥ICINITS' St<ETCH ACCEPTANCE CF A PA~CEr OF LANE FCK 55¥ISE~ HCP~.INS ~.OAD E~TENDEE FRO~ ~II, FS & WELLS ~OR ~ HOLLY ¥ TERR AR~Ofl M,LIN FARM FIELD OR 1-19 ~'~: 12-16-97 h .sc,,~: 1" = 2o0' I /~ ~ D~IEILL &:/=//~, LTD. ~ NO.: RC4890380~~~ ~e ~e ~e ~ ~ I ~o II :, ,~ _~ II I · ~" I/ · .%E,. ~ /I I 'ii;i," . u.~.~ '~ ' ' - /"' ~ ... // ~ : Ii X : MATCH LINE - SEE SHEET ~e ~e P~ANNER~e ~ · 0~ ~~~· ~220 · (!~04) ,.I20-2~t~7 · TAX (,~04) CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Meeting Date: March 10, 1999 Item Number: 8. ¢. 9. b. Subject: Acceptance of a Parcel of Land Adjoining Chester Road and Perrymont Road from Premier Partners, Inc. County_ Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors accept the conveyance of a parcel of land containing 0.6318 acres adjoining the south right of way line of Chester Road (State Route 145) and the West right of way line of Perrymont Road (State Route 1625) from Premier Partners, Inc., and authorize the County Administrator to execute the necessary deed. Summary of Information: It is the policy of the County to acquire right of way whenever possible through development to meet the ultimate road width as shown on the County Thoroughfare Plan. The dedication of this parcel conforms to that plan, and will decrease the right of way costs for road improvements when constructed. District: Bermuda John N. Harmon Attachments: YesI Title: Riqht of Way Manaqer 151 VICINITY SKETCH ACCEPTANCE OF A PARCEL OF LAN~ ADJOINING CHESTER ~.CAD ANE PERRYMONT ROAD FROM PP~,MIER PART~ERS INC 152 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Meeting Date: March 10, 1999 Item Number: 8.c.10. Subject: Vacation and Re-dedication of a Drainage Easement Across the Property of LaVerne C. Cole County_ Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: ~ Board Action Requested: Authorize the Chairman of the Board and County Administrator to execute a drainage agreement and maintenance contract for the vacation and re-dedication of a drainage easement across the property of LaVerne C. Cole. Summary of Information: On September 15, 1998 a drainage agreement and maintenance contract, was recorded in deed book 3367, page 392, which conveyed a drainage easement according to a plat by Timmons, dated August 21, 1998; however, the easement should have been granted according to a plat by Timmons, dated October 20, 1998. The relocation of this easement has been reviewed by staff approval is recommended. District: Bermuda Harmon Attachments: YesI INo Title: Riqht of Way Manager ,--, %'ICINITt SFS~%CH VACATION ANE ~5-DEEICATION CFA D~AIN~GE E~SEMES2 ACRCSS TD5 P~C~F'E5%k OF LAVE~SE, C COLE 9 G CURV~ TABLE DEL IA RADIUS ARC CHORD 24'24'05' 160.55 68.`78 67.86 16' MOOREs CEMETERY '~ GPIN: 7976555955 I HOME DEPOT USA, INC~ DB 316B, PG 85 ' GPIN: 7986551741 I DB 3248, PG 474 N: , EXIS nNG 50' D.B. 2974. PG. 8J7 DEPOT USA, INC. i GPIN: 7986551741 16' DRAINAGE DB 3248, PG 497 SEMENT " 3. 89 - ' ' °' ,, LA VE~EN£ C~ C~ 27~ ~ST HUNDR~ ROAD ~N: 797~556717 LINE TABLE LINE BEARING =DISTANCE LI N 77~7°51' E 20,7.91 L2 S 10'41'42' E 16.01 LJ N 77"07'51~ E 203,90 L4 S !0'45'28" E ~6.01 L5 S I0'42'16' E 4.68 PLAT SHOWING A DRAINAGE EASEMENT (DAGMTM) ACROSS THE PROPERTY OF LA VERNE C. COLE BERMUDA DISTRICT ,., CHESTERFIELD COUNTY, VIRIGN[A PREVIOUS JOB NO.. 'IMMO]V'$ PRINCE 4.411 CROSSINGS GEORGE, V~RGINIA TE: 98 SCALE: I'~I00' DRAWN BY.. AW~ CHECKED BY: Y/MN CALC. CHK.:. JOB NO.: JN: 17768-ES CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Meeting Date: March 10, 1999 Item Number: 8.C. 11. Subject: Conveyance of an Easement to Bell Atlantic-Virginia, Inc. Approval to Install Underground Cable on County Property and County_ Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Authorize the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors and the County Administrator to execute easement and license agreements with Bell Atlantic-Virginia, Inc. to install underground cable on County property to serve the new Spring Run Elementary School. Summary of Information: Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors authorize the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors and the County Administrator to execute easement and license agreements with Bell Atlantic-Virginia, Inc. to install underground cable on County property to serve the new Spring Run Elementary School. This request has been reviewed by staff and approval is recommended. District: Matoaca Preparer: J~~hn W Attackments: Yes Title: Riqht of Way Manaqer 157 VICINITY SKETCH CONYEYANCE CF AN E~SE~E[~.T ~O BELL ATLAN~'IC-,VIRGINIA IN~: AND APPRO~AL TO INSTALl UIiE'ERC-KOUKD CABLE ON COUKTt PRCPERTI [£ · ~ ii I I I III ~ 11 II II I J II I ~ I NORTH 16 WL EASEMENT '~15' J~ELL ATLANTIC EASEMEN1-- I I I PLAT SHOWING BELL ATLANTIC-VIRGINIA, INC. EASEMENT GRANTOR: County of Chesterfield PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION: Spring Run Elementary School 13901 Spring R~ad DISTRICT: Matoaca BIA JOB I !~0. NO: 82933RIV DATE: 2 - 12 - 99 COUNTY: Chesterfield WIRE CENTER: Bethia PREPARED BY: CDI I JBD R/W PERMIT NO: B C--, - ~01 9 ~'~ I II STATE: Virginia CD! W.O. NO: 981996 SCALE: Not To Scale SHEET 3 OF 5 DENOTES LOCATION OF 1._~5' BELL ATLANTIC-VIRGINIA, INC. EASEMENT AS SHOWN HEREON. II I 159 0~ LzO xoOz z // / / // // Meeting Date:March 10, 1999 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Item Number: Page x of_2t_ 8.C.12. Subject: Additional Vocational School Grant Funds for FY99 County Administrator's Comments: CountyAdministrator: BoardAcfion Requested: The School Board requests the Board of Supervisors to appropriate additional grant funds for vocational education for FY99 in the amount of $105,426 to the Instruction appropriation category in the School Grants Fund Summary of Information: Chesterfield County Public Schools (CCPS) receives supplemental grant funds during the fiscal year in addition to the funds budgeted on an annual basis that must be used for specific purposes. CCPS has received notification of additional State, Federal and local funding for the Vocational Education program for FY99 and these funds need to be appropriated in order to use the funds for the purpose for which they were intended. A description of'each grant funding follows. Preparer: ~~~~ Title: '- WXl±i~ ~ ~osneru ar. 1 Attachments: Yes ~-~ No Superintendent CHESTERFIELD COUNT~''~ BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 2 of ~ Summary of Information: (Continued) Notification has been received from various sources of vocational education funding for fiscal year 1999. Below is a brief description of each funding amount. FY99 Integrated Manufacturing Technology Grant (State) $ 75,000 CCPS was awarded a sPecial'State grant of $75,000 from the State Department of Education on .September 2, 1998 for an integrated manufacturing technology ~og~m!.; Th~!~peri~d!~of this grant is August 3~?~1998 through June 30, ii1999 and thesei~f~ndSimust be spent on iht~grated manufacturingtechnologY~ .... ~'~'equlpment.~ FY99 Carl Perkins Vocational Education Grant 20,502 (Federal) ?-~'"~ ......... ' ..... ......... ~,~ :, ' ~ CCPS receivedState Superi~tendent's Memorandum #133 dated September .ll,,...~.199~..~awardlng,the. schoo~.system $420,502 of Carl Perkins Vocational Education federal funding for the fiscal year 1999. The FY99 School Board Financial Plan included an estimated award of $400,000; therefore, the balance of $20,502 needs to be appropriated so the funds can be spent as intended. FY99 Carl Perkins Vocational Education (Reimbursement) 9,924 The lead bilingual interpreter in the vocational program at the Chesterfield Technical Center is shared between Chesterfield (60%) and Hehrico (40%). Henrico reimburses cCpS ~for their share of the cost and for FY99 this amount is $9,924 to cover salary~and benefits for this empii°yee. . 162 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 3 of 3 Meeting Date: March 10. 1999 Number Bud.qet and Mana,qement Comments: This School Board request is to increase the Instruction appropriation by $105,426 for FY99 for the Integrated Manufacturing Technology Grant ($75,000)and the Carl Perkins Vocational Education grant ($30,426). In addition, $9,924 in reimbursement funds from Henrico County for the shared cost of a bilingual interpreter needs to be appropriated. The Integrated Manufacturing Technology grant is a new grant award for FY99. An estimate for the Carl Perkins grant was included in FY99 adopted budget; however, notification of additional funds has been received. Rebecca T. Dickson Title: Director, Bud,qet & Management 163 VIRGINIA: At a regular meeting of the Chesterfield County School Board held Thursday evening, February 25, 1999, at seven-thirty o'clock in the County meeting room at the Chesterfield County Courthouse Complex PRESENT: Thomas L. Wootton, Jr., Chairman Elizabeth B. Davis, Vice-Chairman Dianne E. Pettitt James R. Schroeder, D.D.S. Marshall W. Trammell, Jr. WHEREAS, Chesterfield County Public Schools (CCPS) has received notification from the State Department of Education of additional State ($75,000) and Federal Carl Perkins ($20,502) funding for the school system's vocational education program; and, WHEREAS, CCPS has also entered into an agreement with Henrico County to share our lead bilingual interpreter for the English as a Second Language (ESL) vocational program ($9,924) for FY99; and, WHEREAS, all of these funds need to be appropriated to the School Grants Fund in order to be used for the purpose for which they were intended; NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that on motion of Mrs. Davis, seconded by Mrs. Pettitt, the School Board requests the Board of Supervisors to approve the appropriation of the following funds to the Instruction appropriation category in the School Grants Fund: Grant Title Funding Source Amount Integrated Manufacturing Technology Carl Perkins Vocational Education Carl Perkins Vocational Education State $ 75,000 Federal 20,502 Local Reimbursement 9,924 Total Instruction Appropriation Increase in School Grants Fund $ 105,426 P~i~B~ / Wiiliam C. B[sher, Jr., Sup~tendent CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Meeting Date: March 10, 1999 Su~ect: Set Public Hearing for Zoning Ordinance Amendment Relative to Bon Air Village County_ Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Page 1 of 1 Item Number: 8. c. 13. Board Action Requested: The Planning Commission and staff.recommend the Board of Supervisors set April 14, 1999, for a public hearing on the. attached Zoning Ordinance Amendment relative to Bon Air Village. Summary_ of information: This is an ordinance which will establish special village zoning regulations for the commercial area of Bon Air. Similar in structure to the other Village Zoning District ( Chester, Ettrick, and Midlothian) yet, these regulations are specifically tailored to the specific conditions and character of Bon Air. It reduces the minimum setbacks and parking requirements and provides architectural standards for new construction. Preparer: Affected property owners and Bon Air business and civic leaders have held several meetings to discuss and provide input to the attached ordinance. An explanation of the proposed ordinance standards is also attached. Thomas E. Jacob~ Title: Director of Planning Attachments: Yes PROPOSED BON AIR VILLAGE ZONING STANDARDS November 10, 1998 Chesterfield County Planning Department Special village character zoning standards are proposed for the Bon Air commercial area, similar to the other village areas. These standards will guide the design of new development to create a design character which is unique to Bon Air. The smaller scale building appearance of Bon Air should be retained with a building orientation to the pedestrians along the front of the buildings. The tighter building form of the older buildings should be retained through zoning setback reductions from the current post development zoning standards. These standards shall be placed in the Village District Standards of the Zoning Ordinance(Chester Village Core provisions will apply except as noted) Proposed Street Section - Bon Air ~ tree .f' ~ ~,~Mas onry wal ~/or hedge Rig ht-of-Way ARCHITECTURE: No architectural style should be mandated because Bon Air has a variety of architectural styles among its substantial buildings. Rather, an architectural requirement should be adopted which provides for the design of buildings to be compatible with area buildings of high quality using traditional and historic ornamentation. The new Exxon and CVS buildings are examples of this approach. The Bon Air Village Area is proposed to be included in Section 19-611 (b): ..... "Buildings shall possess architectural variety but shall be compatible with existing structures, especially nearby structures of high historic interest." PARKING: The sidewalks planned for Bon Air will allow customers to park at one business and walk to nearby businesses, similar to shopping centers. Therefore, the shopping center standard minus 10% (4.0 spaces/1000sq, ft.) is recommended for retail and office uses. In addition, the requirements for other uses should similarly be reduced by 10%. Off site parking is to be allowed at churches or other available parking lots through a lease system if located within the village boundary or within 1000 feet of the village boundary. 166 SIGNS: The village sign requirements should be adopted for Bon Air. PEDESTRIAN SCALE DECORATIVE STREET LIGHTS: These lights are being installed in conjunction with the VDOT street and streetscape project. REAR AND SIDE SETBACKS: Reduce to O' where adjacent to non-residential zoning or use. Parcels which are adjacent to property designated as residential use on the Comprehensive Plan, except property occupied by non-residential use, will have the following requirements: a 15 foot side yard setback with landscaping B a 25 foot rear yard setback with landscaping B either or both setbacks may be reduced to 0 feet through construction of a wall of similar material as the main building or location of a main building wall with no openings adjacent to the residential use.(note: fire and building codes may require more expensive construction techniques when these setbacks are reduced) FRONT SETBACK: Minimum setback shall be 0'. (Buford Road is 70' ultimate ROW, Forest Hill Avenue is 90'). Since the existing R/W is 60', there will be generally a 5' green' space behind the sidewalk along Buford Road and a 15' green space behind the sidewalk along Forest Hill for new development subject to these requirements. LANDSCAPING: One large deciduous tree for each 50' lineal feet of road frontage. Three foot high decorative walls or hedge to be required where the parking lot is in front of the building ( Landscaping G as amended). The trees shall be located as close to the street as permitted by the location of the aerial utility lines. The location may be close to the dedicated R/W or located within the dedicated R/W with VDOT approval. HEIGHT: A maximum of three stories or 45 feet, whichever is less, is recommended. These standards will apply to the Bon Ak commercial area centered around the intersection of Forest Hill Avenue and Buford Road See attached map. 167 AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE CODE OF THE COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD, 1997, AS AMENDED, BY AMENDING AND RE-ENACTING SECTIONS 19-606, 19-607, 19-608, 19-609 AND 19-612 AND ADDING SECTION 19-613 CREATING DESIGN STANDARDS FOR THE BON AIR VILLAGE BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County: (1) That Sections 19-606, 19-607, 19-608, 19-609 and 19-612 of the Code of the County of Chesterfield, 1997, as amended, is amended and re-enacted to read as follows: Sec. 19-606. Areas of applicability and exemptions. The village district shall include all lands specified in this section. OOO The Bon Air Village, comprised of all that area shown on the map entitled "Bon Air Village Zoning District" prepared by the Chesterfield County Planning Department and dated December 9, 1998. Sec. 19-607. Implementation of plans and guidelines. In acting upon any zoning approval, development approval, historic district, landmark or landmark site designation; or other decision under this article; which decision will impact a designated village district, the responsible body, officer or agent shall review such decisions for conformity with all and any officially adopted plans and guidelines for development within such districts and the following ordinances. Sec. 19-608. Exceptional development standards. (a) Parking: Parking requirements in the village district for indoor commercial recreational facilities; self-service gasoline stations; office buildings of up to 26,500 square feet; restaurants, including fast-food and drive-in restaurants; retail stores; personal services; repair shops; banks; greenhouses; nursery centers; and lawn and garden centers shall be based on the requirements for shopping centers or similar retail groups of buildings as set forth in section 19-513. Improved, designated parking spaces in a public right-of-way may be counted toward the required number of parking spaces so required when more than one-half of each such space adjoins the site. Further, the required number of parking spaces may be reduced by ten percent if the development contains a sidewalk or other pedestrian walkway system that connects to existing walkways or that may be connected to future walkways. In addition if approved by the Director of Planning, in the Bon Air 1014:43141.1 1 2/22/99 9:35 AM (ghh) Village, a business may reduce the required number of on-site parking spaces by pro-rata if it has an agreement with another entity permitting off-site parking on a lot located within the B0n Air Village boundaries or within 1000 feet of the Bon Air Village boundaries. All other requirements of division 1, subdivision II of this manual shall apply as described. In the Ettrick Business Core, the following uses shall be exempt from the requirements of Section 19-513 and 19-509(b): offices having a gross floor plan area which does not exceed five thousand (5,000) square feet, restaurants and retail uses, including personal services, repair shops, specialty shops and contractor offices without heavy vehicles or equipment. 000 Street tree planting; Within the Bon Air Village, it is the intent of perimeter landscaping G. as detailed in section 19-518(g)(9), to require the installation of street trees to increase the aesthetic appeal of the village, encourage high-quality development, provide shade for pedestrians and improve the quality of the environment, TO this end, the following standards shall be met when utilizing perimeter landscaping G: (1) The requirements of § 19-518(g)(9)(a) and (c) shall be met. The requirements of § 19-518(g)(9)(b) shall be modified to require continuous three (3) foot high hedge forms a decorative wall for the entire width of a parking lot only if the parking lot is located in front ora building. Trees shall be installed behind the sidewalk, If it is determined during the site plan process to be impractical to install trees behind the sidewalk, they may be installed between the street and the sidewalk. If it is determined during the site plan process tO be impractical to locate large deciduous trees due to conflicts with utility lines the trees may be relocated or if that is impractical, small deciduous trees may be substituted. Trees installed shall be suitable for use as street trees and shall be selected for their ability to survive under adverse growing conditions as well as their aesthetic value. While the intent of this section is not tO require a single species to be planted throughout the entire village, the director of planning may require a particular species in a particular location based on existing area landscaping, The minimum acreage requirements set forth in sections 19-105(i) and 19-11 l(a) for R-TH and R-MF districts shall not apply within the Chester Village areas. Buffers and screening in the Ettrick Village Core: Buffers required by section 19-523 shall not apply. If parking is provided on any property in an O, C or I district adjacent to an R, 1014:43141.1 2 2/22/99 9:35 A~M 169 R-TH or R-MF district, a 1 O-foot wide buffer shall be provided. This buffer shall include an evergreen hedge with a minimum installed height of four feet or a solid fence or wall six feet in height. Along side property lines that abut property in R, R-TH or R-MF districts, this buffer may be reduced to a width of three feet in accordance with Section 19-609(g)(2). Sec. 19-609. Setback requirements for O and C Districts. OOO Bon Air Village: The minimum setbacks for all buildings, drives, and surface and deck parking areas shall be as follows: Front and corner side setbacks; The minimum front and corner side setbacks shall be 0 feet. Side setbacks: Except as noted below, the minimum side setback shall be 15 feet with the installation of perimeter landscaping B for property adjacent to any R, R- TH, R-MF District or any property designated for an R, R-TH or R-MF District on the comprehensive plan or any property used for residential purposes. This setback may be reduced to 0 feet upon installation of a wall, 8 feet in height, made of material similar to the principal building or by locating the main building's wall (.with no openings) adjacent to the residential property, When abutting an O, C or I District or property occupied by an O, C or I use, the minimum setback shall be 0 feet. Rear Setbacks; Except as noted below, the minimum side setback shall be 25 feet with the installation of perimeter landscaping B for property adjacent to any R, R- TH, R-MF District or any property designated for an R, R-TH or R-MF District on the comprehensive plan or any property used for residential purposes. This setback may be reduced to 0 feet upon installation of a wall, 8 feet in height, and made of material similar to the principal building or by locating the main building's wall (with no openings) adjacent to the residential property, When abutting an O, C or I District or property occupied by an O, C or I use, the minimum setback shall be 0 feet. (2) That Section 19-613 of the Code of the Count. of Chesterfield, 1997, as amended, is added to read as follows: Sec. 19-613. Signs, The applicable sign standards for property located within a village district are contained in 1014:43141.1 3 2/22/99 9:35 AM l?O § 19-644. (3) That this ordinance shall become effective immediately upon adoption. 1014:43141.1 4 2/22/99 9:35 AM 171 Attachment Sec. 19-610. Setback requirements for I Districts. (a) All village areas, except Chester: The minimum setbacks for all buildings, drives and surface and deck parking areas shall be as follows: (1) Setbacks along major arterials: The minimum setback along major arterials for buildings, drives and parking areas shall be 75 feet in I-1 and 1-2 Districts and 90 feet in I-3 Districts with the installation of perimeter landscaping B within the setback. However, in I-1 Districts this setback may be reduced to 50 feet with the installation of perimeter landscaping C. (2) Front and corner side setbacks: The minimum setback along rights-of-way other than major arterials for buildings, drives and parking areas shall be 40 feet in I-1 Districts, 60 feet in 1-2 Districts and 90 feet in I-3 Districts with the installation of perimeter landscaping A within the setback. However, in I-1 districts this setback may be reduced to 25 feet with the installation of perimeter landscaping C. .(b) Chester Village District areas: Ail requirements shall be the same as noted in subsection (a) except that landscaping in front and corner side yards shall be perimeter landscaping G. Sec. 19-611. Architectural treatment. (a) Within the Ettrick Business Core: New development shall be compatible with the pedestrian scale and historic village character of Ettrick. New or altered buildings should be generally consistent in height, scale, massing (shape) and materials with existing structures in the village. The intent of this section is to insure functional and visual compatibility, not to specifically encourage imitation of past architectural styles. (b) Within all other village districts: No building exterior (whether front, side or rear) shall consist of architectural materials inferior in quality, appearance or detail to any other 1014:43141.1 5 2/22/99 9:35 AM Attachment exterior of the same building. Nothing in this section shall preclude the use of different materials on different exteriors (which would be acceptable if representative of good architectural design) but rather, shall preclude the use of inferior materials on sides which face adjoining property and thus, might adversely impact existing or future development causing a substantial depreciation of property values. No portion of a building constructed of unadorned cinder block or corrugated and/or sheet metal shall be visible from any adjoining A, R, R-TH, R-MF or O District or any public right of way. Further, buildings shall be designed to impart harmonious proportions and to avoid monotonous facades or large bulky masses. Buildings shall possess architectural variety but shall be compatible with existing structures, especially nearby structures of high historic interest. New or remodeled buildings shall enhance an overall cohesive village character as reflected in existing structures. This character shall be achieved through the use of design elements--including, but not limited to, materials, balconies and/or terraces, articulation of doors and windows, sculptural or textural relief of facades, architectural ornamentation, varied roof lines or other appurtenances such as lighting fixtures and/or planting--as are described in the applicable adopted plans and guidelines. Sec. 19-612. Heights. The maximum height of all buildings within any O, C or I district shall be as specified in this section, except as provided in section 19-507 and 19-507.1 (1) Midlothian Village Core, Chester Village Corridor East: No structure shall exceed a height of two and one-half stories or 30 feet, whichever is less. (2) All other village district areas: No structure shall exceed a height of three stories or 45 feet, whichever is less. (3) Generally: No structure within 200 feet of any property in an R, R-TH or R-MF district shall exceed a height of two and one-half stories or 30 feet, whichever is less. However, if there is an existing dwelling more than two and one-half stories in height within 100 feet of the district, the height of the structure may be increased to the height of the dwelling. 1014:43141.1 6 2/22/99 9:35 AM · ' 1'73 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 2 Meeting Date: March 10, 1999 Item Number: 8. ¢. 13 Subject: Set Public Hearing for The Route 285 Corridor Plan and related Zoning Ordinance Amendments. County_ Administrator's Comments; County_ Administrator; Board Action Requested; The staff recommends the Board of Supervisors set April 14, 1999, for a public hearing on The Route 288 Corridor Plan and related Zoning Ordinance Amendments. Summary_ of information; The Planning Commission has recommended The Route 288 Corridor Plan, the Water and Wastewater Ordinance Amendment and the Design Standards Ordinance amendment to the Board of Supervisors. The Plan replaces a portion of The Upper Swif~ Creek Plan, and reviewed part of The Midlothian Community Plan. With the construction of Route 288, change is coming to the northwestern part of Chesterfield County. The Route 288 Corridor Plan provides a guide for development in the area surrounding the extension of Route 288. Important issues addressed in The Route 288 Corridor Plan include: · Attracting high quality economic development proposals to the area. · Updating the County's Thoroughfare Plan to reflect the road network necessary to serve future development in this area. · Maintaining[ the health of the Swift Creek Reservoir as a drinking water source for County residents. Preparer: · ~~ Title: Director of Planning Thomas E. Jacobs'~ C:DATA/BOS/1999/MAR1099.2/GOK Attachments: Yes ~ No CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 2 of 2 Meeting Date: March 10, 1999 Item Number: Summary_ of Information: (Continued) Major recommendations of The Route 288 Corridor Plan include: Provide land uses that maximize economic development opportunities in the area for the future of the County and the region - Approximately 2800 acres have been designated for industrial, office and other employment uses. Adopt standards to increase the quality of development in the area. Promote ongoing efforts to protect water quality in the Upper Swift Creek Reservoir and its tributary streams. Adopt an ordinance that will require new development to utilize public water and sewer. Create a historic designated area around Hallsborough Tavem and Bethel Baptist Church that will protect these structures for the future. Outstanding Issue: The original staff version of Tho Route 288 Corridor Plan recommended Regional Employment Center as the land use for the area around the 288/60 interchange. However, the land owner requested that the Plan allow high-end retail uses on the northwest quadrant of Route 288/60. The Planning Commission, after extensive discussion, decided that they would include a note (Note 2, page RT22) to allow high-end retail at this location. The Midlothian District Planning Commissioner voted against the Plan as a result of this decision, and supports instead, a more detailed Appendix C (which is attached). The Bermuda District Planning Commissioner abstained on the vote for the Plan. Attachments: Draft version of Th~ Route 288 Corridor Plan as recommended by the Planning Commission Draft Ordinance amendments Proposed Appendix C: Alternative language to Note 2 of the Land Use Categories (page RT 22, Chart 3). · " 175 AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND TIlE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS MANUAL OF THE CODE OF THE COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD, 1997, AS AMENDED, BY AMENDING SECTION 19-518, 19-580, 19-581, AND ADDING SECTIONS 19-590.1 19-590.2, 19-590.3, 19-590.4, 19-590.5, 19-590.6, 19-590.7, 19-590.8, 19-590.9 and 19-509.10 RELATING TO DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS IN TIlE REGIONAL EMPLOYMENT CENTER AREA OF THE ROUTE 288 CORRIDOR PLAN BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County: (I) That Sections 19-518, 19-580, 19-581 of the Development Standarcls Manual of the Code q£ the Coun.tv of Chesterfield, 1997, as amended, are amended and reenacted to read as follows: Sec. 19 - 518. Plant material specifications. OOO (g) Perimeter Landscaping. Landscaping shall be required at the outer boundaries of projects or i~n~l in the required yards ora lot, parcel or development, except when driveways or other openings may be required. There shall be different landscaping requirements in yards and parking areas, as identified herein and in the particular districts, which shall be provided as follows: 000 (11) Perimeter lw~dscapingL' At least one and one-half (1.5) times perimeter landscaping C (option I) 000 Sec. 19-580. '~ '- -~ ,.,~.,~.~, ,.~,,,, ,,~,,, ~,,~L~.,... Specified Areas. The Highway Corridor District shall include those lands identified on the zoning district map that include: (al) The Jefferson Davis Highway corridor; and (bii) The Route 360 corridor. The Employment Center District shall include all lands identified on the zoning district map that include; ILD Regional Employment Center. 1014(05):23327.1 Revised 2/10/99 at 1:45 p.m. 176 Sec. 19-581. General development standards. ":-' ....... ~ .... -'~ -- "'"-'-:-'- Except for the deve{oument standards contained in the Highway Corridor District and the Employment Center District. which shall apply to property within those distr}cts, all applicable county-wide, emerging growth or post-development standards shall be met. 000 (2) That Sections 19-590.1, 19-590.2, 19-590.3, 19-590.4, 19-590.5, 19-590.6, 19-590.7, 19-590.8, 19-590.9 and 19-509.10 are added to the Development Standards Manual of the Code of the Count. qf Chesterfield, 1997, as amended, to read as follows: ARTICLE III. DEVELOPMENT REQUIREMENTS - OFFICE, COMMERCIAL, AND INDUSTRIAL DIVISION 2. DEVELOPMENT REQUII~MENTS -SPECIFIED AREAS Sec, 19-590.1, Purpose and Intent of Employment Center District; The purpose 0f~hi~ division is to provide standards that will encourage and enhance the development of quality office and industrial parks. The intent of this division is to establish special re_malations which mandate specific land use regulations and development standards and requirements to produce compatible land use patterns; treat? aesthetically pleasing developments: encourage the use of quali _ty materials for building construction: provide continuity_ and sufficient levels of landscaping and lighting throughout each deyeloprn~nt, and promote improved pedestrian and vehicular circulation while maintaining flexibility where possible. Sec. 19-590.2. Design Standards for Off-Street Parking in the Employment Center District. (a) Su~_ace Treatment: With the exception of areas where track mounted equipment is stored. parking areas and driveways shall be paved with concrete, bituminous concrete or similar material. (b) Number qfSpaces: The required number of parking spaces may be reduced by ten (10) percent if the development includes a pedestrian way that connects to an existing or proposed pedestrian way. or that may be connected to a future pedestrian way. Sec, 19-590.3. Yard Requirements in the Employment Center Distri~:t, l014(05):23327.1 Revised 2/10/99 at 1:45 p.m. 2 177 (?,) Setbacks Along Major Arterials excluding limited access roads: All buildings, drives and parking areas shall have a minimum seventy-five (75) foot setback from the proposed rights-of-way of ma_ior arterials, excklding limited access roads, as indicated on the comprehensive plan. Within these setbacks, landscaping shall be installed in accordance with perimeter landscaping I. (~b) Front and Comer Side Yards ,~etbacks Along Collector Streets: The front and comer side yard setback for buildings, drives, and parking areas shall be a minimum of forty (40) feet from the proposed rights-of-way 0fcollector ~treets. as indicated on the comprehensive plan. However. in an I-2 district, setbacks shall be increased to sixty_ (60) feet. and in an 1-3 district, setbacks shall be increased to ninety (90) fe~, Within the$~ ~e~backs, landscaping shall be installed in accordance with perimeter landscaping C. (c) Other Front and Comer Side Yards: Th~ front and comer side yard setback for buildings. drives, and parking areas shall be a minimum of twenty-five (25) feet from proposed rights-of-way except those indicated as limited access, major arterials, and collector streets on the comprehensive plan. Within these setbacks, landscaping shall be installed in accordance with perimeter landscaping Sec. 19-590.4. Exterior Lighting in the Employment Center District. (a) Street Lighting: Street li~ting shall be installed at all comers of street intersections. Street lights shall be high cut off' shoq~-box ~tyl~ lighting fixtures. (b) Lte_hting Within a Site: Parking lot and access lighting within an individual ~ite shall be high cut offshoe-box style lighting fixtures and shall not exceed thirty. (30) feet in height and designed to minimize light spilIover into residential areas. Sec. 19-590.5. Outdoor Storage in the Employment Center District. (a) Amount: Outdoor storage, if permitted by the underlying zoning district as accessory_ to a permitted use. shall be limited to no more than 50% of the gross floor area of the principal use, (b) Screening: All outdoor storage shall be screened from view from any adjacent properties and public ri~ts-of-way. Screening shall be accomplished by building design or by the use of durable architectural walls constructed of comparai~le materials to the principal bpilding arid v~ing a design compatible to the principal building on the property. Sec. 19-590.6. Screening of Solid Waste Storage Areas in the Employment Center District, All solid waste storage areas shall be screened from view of adjacent property_ and public fights-of- way by a masonry_ or concrete wall which is constructed of comparable materials to and designed to be compatible with the principal building that the solid waste storage area serve~, 1014(05):23327.1 Revised 2/10/99 at 1:45 p.m. 3 Sec. 19-590,7, Architectural Treatment in the Employment Center District. Architectural treatment of buildings, including materials, color and style, shall be compatible with btlil~lings located within the same project or within the same block or directly across any street. Compatibility. may be achieved through the use of similar building massing, materials, scale, colors or other architectural features. Nothing in this section shall preclude the use of different materials on different building exteriors but rather, shall preclude the use of inferior materials on sides which face adjoining property_. No building exterior (whether front, side. or rear) shall consist of architectural materials inferior in quality_, appearance or detail to any other exterior of the same building, No building exterior (whether front, side or rear) shall be constructed of metal or unadorned concrete block. The exterior of outbuildings shall not be constructed of materials inferior to those of the primary, building and shall be architecturally consistent with the primary, building. Mechanical equipment, whether ground-level or rooftop, shall be screened from view of adjacent property_ and public fights-of-way and designed to be perceived as an inte_m-al part of the building. Sec, 19-590,8, Heights in the Employment Center District. Except as outlined in sections 19-507 and 19-507,1. the height of any building within any O or I district shall be permitted to be a maximum of 150 feet in height, The height of any other building or structure shall be as specified in § 19-598. Sec. 19-590.9. Loading and Storage Areas in the Employment Center District. Buildings adjacent to limited access roads shall be oriented such that loading and storage areas are located internally. This shall be accomplished through the use of building orientation and site design. Sec, 19-590,10, Design of BMP's in the Employment Center District. Any BMPs required for water quantity or quality control shall be designed as retention basins and shall be landscaped or otherwise improved so that the facilities become visual enhancements. BMP's shall include landscaping adjacent to the BMP's. gently sloping banks, and aquatic, and where appropriate, sub-aquatic plantings. Any fencing used shall be of an omamental design. At the time of site plan review, a plan depicting these requirements shall be submitted for review and approval. (2) That this ordinance shall become effective immediately upon adoption. 1014(05):23327.1 Revised 2/10/99 at 1:45 p.m. 179 AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE CODE OF THE COUNTY OF CHESTE~IF. LD, 1997, AS AMENDED, BY AMENDING AND REENACTING SECTIONS 17-9 l, 18-63 AND 18-64, RELATING TO WATER AND WASTEWATER CONNECTIONS IN THE ROUTE 288 CORRIDOR PLAN AREA BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County: (1) That Sections 17-91, 18-63 and 18-64 of the Code of the County of Chesterfield. 997, as amended, are amended and reenacted to read as follows: Sec. 17-91. Size of lots served by conventional septic systems. (a) In any subdivision utilizing conventional septic systems the average lot size shall be no less than 40,000 square feet, at least 90 percent of all lots in the subdivision shall be at least 40,000 square feet in size, and no lot shall be less than 30,000 square feet in size. In addition, all lots in the subdivision shall have a minimum lot width of 120 feet measured at the building line. This subsection shall apply to any property for which residential zoning is obtained after February 23, 1989; however, this subsection shall apply to every residential lot which is recorded after January 1, 1991. (b) No subdivision of land within the Southern and Western Plan Area for which residential zoning is obtained after ~'-- -~'--~' ~- ~ .... ~'--' .... L .... :- - [1u 1993] ,,~ ~,.~,v ~ ~,,~L~ ,~. ~,,~ ~..~,o~,.,~,,, ne 23, may utilize conventional septic systems unless all lots in such subdivision are at least one acre in size and located in those areas designated in the county's comprehensive plan for single-family residential use in the lowest density category. (Areas colored tan on the Southern and Western Area Land Use Plan.) (c) No subdivision of land within the Route 288 Corridor Plan Area for which residential zoning is obtained after (effective date) may utilize conventional septic systems unless all lots in such subdivision are at least one acre in size and located in those areas desi~ated in the county's comprehensive plan for single-family residential use in the lowest densi~ category_, (Areas colored tan on the Route 288 Corridor Plan area), (Code 1978, § 18.1-55) OOO Sec. 18-63. Mandatory water connections in certain areas. (b) 000 All structures which are located on property that is included in the Southern and Western 1014:23333.1 1 12/9/98 4:40 PM Area Plan described in the subdivision ordinance and which received zoning approval after June 23, 1993 shall connect to the water system. However, the following structures shall not be required to connect unless connection to the water system is otherwise required by law: (1) Temporary. manufactured or mobile homes ~~:m~; (2) Structures that were authorized by conditional uses or special exceptions which were renewed after June 23, 1993; (3) Structures that are authorized by conditional uses or special exceptions that were granted after June 23, 1993 if the use that is permitted by the conditional use or special exception is incidental to a principal use that was previously allowed with a private well; (4) Governmental structures and institutional buildings; and (5) Residences-that are located on lots that are exempt from the requirements of the subdivision ordinance. ~ All structures which ar~ located on prq~p?r~_ that is included in the Route 288 Corridor Plan Area as shown in comprehensive plan. and which received zoning approval after (adoption date here'~ shall connect to the water system. However. the following structures shall not be required to connect unles~ connection t0 ~h~ water ~ystem is otherwise required by law: (1) Temporary. manufactured or mobile homes: (2) Structures that were authorized bv conditional uses or special exceptions which were renewed after (adoption date here): O) Structures that are authorized by conditional uses or special exceptions that were granted after (adoption date here) if the use that is permitted by the conditional use or special exception is incidental to a principal use that was previously allowed with a private well: (4) Govemmentat ~tructures and institutional buildings: and (J..) Residences that are located on lots that are exempt from the requirements of the subdivision ordinance. (ed) For purposes of this section "structure" and "institutional building" shall have the same meaning as in the zoning ordinance. (de) The planning commission may gram exceptions to subsections (b) and itc) during schematic plan, site plan or tentative subdivision review. The Planning Commission may also grant exceptions to subsections (b) and (c) to an applicant who files an application with the planning department on a form prescribed by the director ofplanni~ng and who pays a fee of $260.00 to the planning department, if the applicant is not su~ect to the schematic, site plan or subdivision review process, iftThe planning commission shall finds that: (1) The use of a private well will not adversely affect the ability to extend public water to other property; (2) The use of a private well will not encourage future development that is inconsistent with the comprehensive plan; and (3) The use of a private well is not reasonably likely to adversely affect the public health, safety or welfare. The planning commission may impose conditions to mitigate the impact of any exception that it grants. 1014:23333.1 2 12/9/98 4:40 PM (Code 1978, § 20-43) Sec. 18-64. Mandatory wastewater connection in certain areas. (a) All structures which are located on property that is included in the Southern and Western Area Plan described in the subdivision ordinance and which received zoning approval at~er June 23, 1993 shall connect to the wastewater system. However, the following structures shall not be required to connect unless connection to the wastewater system is otherwise required by law: (1) Single-family dwellings on lots which are at least one acre in size and which are located in areas that are designated in the comprehensive plan for single-family residential use in the lowest density category (areas colored tan on the Southem and Western Area Land Use Plan); (2) Temporary. manufactur¢~l or tVl~obile homes; (3) Structures that were authorized by conditional uses or special exceptions which were renewed after June 23, 1993; (4) Structures that are authorized by conditional uses or special exceptions that were granted after June 23, 1993 if the use that is permitted by the conditional use or special exception is incidental to a principal use that was previously allowed with a septic system; (5) Governmental structures and institutional buildings; and (6) Residences that are located on lots that are exempt from the requirements of the subdivision ordinance. (b) All structures which are located on property_ that is included in the Route.288 Corridor Plan Area as shown in the comprehensive plan. and which received zoning approval after (adoption date here) shall connect to the wastewater system. However. the following structures shall not be required to connect unless connection to the wastewater system is otherwise required by law: Single-family dwellings on lots which are at least one acre in size and which are located in areas that are designated in the comprehensive plan for single-family residential use in the lowest density_ category. (areas colored tan on the Route 288 Corridor Plan area) Temporary_ manufactured or mobile homes' (3) Structures that were authorized by conditional uses or special exceptions which were renewed after (adoption date here); Structures that are authorized by conditional uses or special exceptions that were _eranted after (adoption date here) if the use that is permitted by 1;he conditional use or special exception is incidental to a principal use thal; was previously allowea with a septic system: (5) Governmental structures and institutional buildings: and (6) Residences that are located on lots that are exempt from the requirements of the subdivision ordinance. For purposes of this section, "structure," "single-family dwelling" and "institutional 1014:23333.1 3 12/9/98 4:40 PM building" shall have the same meaning as in the zoning ordinance. (ed) The Planning Commission may also grant exceptions to subsections (b) and (c) to an applicant who files an application with the planning department on a form prescribed bv the director of planning and who pays a fee of $260.00 to the planning department, if the applicant is not sub_iect to the schematic, site plan or subdivision review process, iftlhe planning commission shall finds that: (1) The use of a septic system will not adversely affect the ability to extend public sewer to other property; (2) The use of a septic system will not encourage future development that is inconsistent with the comprehensive plan; and (3) The use of a septic system is not reasonably likely to adversely affect the public health, safety or welfare. The planning commission may impose conditions to mitigate the impacts of any exception that it grants. (2) That this ordinance shall become effective immediately upon adoption. 1014:23333.1 4 12/9/98 4:40 PM 153 Appendix C The primary purpose of the Regional Employment Center (the "REC") is to encourage the expansion of the local tax base with the development of office, research and development facilities, warehouse and other light industrial uses, as well as retail necessary to support those uses. The REC represents one of the County's last opportunities to establish and promote a large, regional employment center. Planning the development of this area is important to the county and its citizens. Typical stdp retail development, if allowed, could overwhelm the Route 60/Route 288 corridor and frustrate the goals of the REC. But, this does not mean the REC should be devoid of retail development. An employment area of the magnitude suggested by this Plan must allow and provide for retail services needed to support businesses and employees within the REC. Such a design can also create a symbiotic relationship that helps reduce traffic congestion on Route 60 and Route 711. In addition, a convenient, well designed, and attractive shopping complex and lifestyle center within the Northwest quadrant of Route 288 and Route 60 can stimulate economic growth by expanding and diversifying the local tax base. However, any new retail development that simply duplicates the existing retail development by drawing essentially from the existing market area would not be beneficial to the overall tax base of the County. Ample additional areas for future retail development have already been designated and allowing typical retail to continue to creep down Route 60 would only serve to cannibalize exiting retail and frustrate other Plans which already provide for additional retail. Instead, a lifestyle center would be desirable if it did not replace existing retail but was instead designed to attract shoppers from a different and wider (regional) market. The lifestyle center could serve as a focal point for the REC, contribute to the local ambience, and create a "sense of place." Consequently, a high fashion and regional-scale lifestyle commercial development (in addition to any permitted supporting and associated/integrated neighborhood scale retail uses) would be appropriate within the northwest quadrant of Route 288 and Route 60 based on the following criteria: 1. The majority of the proposed major tenants are classified as high end/high fashion companies. Examples include, but are not limited to, Nordstroms, Bloomingdales, Neiman Marcus, Lord & Taylor, and Saks Fifth Avenue. A focus should also be on tenants with a "flagship store" strategy. 2. "Flagship Store." Flagship stores are larger and have a broader scope of merchandise than a prototypical regional mall store. These retailers may combine multiple divisions or merchandise collections within one store. These types of stores are also strategically located to draw customers from a larger geographic base. Usually, although not exclusively, flagship stores have one large store to serve a large metropolitan region. 3. High-end home furnishings or home accessory tenant. 4. Entertainment tenants such as movie theaters, other performance venues such as community stage theaters, or theme destinations entertainment retailers. 5. Related uses such as offices, hotels, upscale restaurants, residential units, and other entertainment uses could also be included within such a lifestyle center provided they are integrated into the complex. If properly integrated or planned, such a complex could also contain some neighborhood retail uses. 6. Route 288 adjacent to the Regional Employment Center should be open to traffic before any regional retail center is opened. 7. This high-end retail development should complement the employment center and not overwhelm it. 8. Design standards should incorporate architectural compatibility within the lifestyle center. 9. Any associated and supporting retail use should avoid typical "strip commercial" characteristics and provide architectural compatibility, interior circulation, pedestrian access features, and other design elements to better integrate such uses into the REC. THE PLAN FOR CHESTERFIELD The Route 288 Corridor Plan EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The newest gateway into Chesterfield County, the Route 288 Corridor, will provide unmatched economic development potential for northwestern Chesterfield. Currently, this area mainly contains agricultural uses and vacant land. Over the next several years, with effective planning and the support of local property owners and citizens, this area can become one of the region's premier office and light industrial employment centers. Important Issues addressed in the Route 288 Corridor planning effort include: · Recognizing the key strategic location of the Route 288 Corridor for future economic development in northwestern Chesterfield County. · Updating the County's Thoroughfare Plan to reflect the road network necessary to serve future development in this area. · Maintaining the health of the Upper Swift Creek Reservoir as a drinking water source for County residents. · Attracting high quality economic development proposals to the area. · Providing adequate public facilities to address the impact of new development. Key Findings include: · Vacant Land: The area is largely undeveloped and zoned for agriculture at this time, with only three subdivisions and a few other residences scattered throughout the study area. · Potential for Change: With the construction of Route 288, the area will see tremendous change over the next several years, from development of infrastructure to the development of new office parks and light industrial uses. · Swift Creek Reservoir: A model developed by a member of the County's Watershed Committee found that existing and projected land uses in the watershed would result in an in-lake phosphorous concentration of .0493 milligrams/liter (mg/I). A consultant-conducted study found that the land use modifications anticipated by this Plarl would result in an in-lake phosphorous concentration of .0501 mg/I, a 1.5 percent increase over the concentration predicted by the original watershed committee model. VVhile both the original model and the consultant's study evaluated the impact of several land use scenarios on phosphorus concentrations in the Reservoir, the values reported in this discussion refer only to average lot sizes of one half acre. This residential density was used because it is considered to be the most likely to be implemented. · Public Facilities: There are limited public facilities and utilities in the area. As development occurs, public utilities will have to be constructed by the developers. · Historic Resources: There are four (4) historic resources in the study area; only one (1) of them, Hallsborough Tavern, is designated as a County historic landmark. All four (4) are in good condition. · Emerging Opportunities: This area, due to its proximity to an excellent transportation network, regional employment centers and a well educated work force, is poised to become another regional employment center. Major Recommendations of The Plan: · Provide land uses that maximize economic development opportunities in the area for the future of the County and the region. · Adopt standards to increase the quality of development required in this area. · Promote ongoing efforts to protect water quality in the Upper Swift Creek Reservoir and its tributary streams. · Adopt an ordinance that will require new development to utilize public water and sewer. ° Create a historic area around Hallsborough Tavern and Bethel Baptist Church that will protect these structures for the future. DRAFT 2/23/99 THE PLAN FOR CHESTERFIELD The Route 288 Corridor P/an Table Of Contents Introduction The Citizen Participation Process Existing Conditions and Important Issues Emerging Opportunities A Plan For Action Goals Recommendations The Land Use Plan Page RT 1 RT 2 RT 3 RT 13 RT 16 RT 17 RT 20 Map A B C D E F List of Maps Base Map Approved Area Developments Existing Generalized Land Use Historic Resources Character Type Map The Route 288 Corridor Land Use Plans and Thoroughfare Follows Page RT 1 RT 4 RT 5 RT 10 RT 12 RT 21 DRAFT 2/23/99 THE PLAN FOR CHESTERFIELD The Route 288 Corridor Plan INTRODUCTION The Route 288 Corridor Plarl area (as shown on Map A), located in northwest Chesterfield County, is an area that is currently used primarily for agriculture, large lot residences or vacant land. With the construction of Route 288, many changes will occur in the area. Route 288 will bring regional access, connecting western Chesterfield with Powhatan, Goochland and Henrico and providing opportunities for the entire County. Route 288's importance to the region is vital. The limited access highway will connect to Powhite Parkway, extend through Chesterfield, with new interchanges at Lucks Lane/Center Pointe Parkway, Woolridge Road Extended and Midlothian Turnpike. It will go through Powhatan County, cross the James River, connecting with the West Creek development in Goochland County and Interstate 64. Chesterfield County residents and businesses will then have direct access to Goochland and western Henrico County. This access will provide additional opportunities for economic development in the Route 288 Corridor area that were not present previously. Development that occurs as a result of Route 288 must be guided to ensure that full advantage is taken of this unique opportunity for Chesterfield. This area is an important part of Chesterfield County's economic future. This Plar~ seeks to maximize the opportunities presented by the construction of Route 288, providing a guide for positive development of the area. How This Plan Works The Route 288 Corridor Plan, once adopted by the Board of Supervisors, will become part of The Plan for Chesterfield, the County's comprehensive plan. The Plan for Chesterfield is used by County citizens, staff, the Planning Commission and Board of Supervisors as a guide for future decisions in the County, including, but not limited to, decisions regarding future land use, road networks and rezonings. Once The Route 288 Corridor Plan is adopted, it will replace parts of The Upper Swift Creek Plan (1991) and The Midlothian Community. Plan (1989). The adoption of The Route 288 Corridor Plat1 will not, however, change any of the current ordinance requirements adopted to protect water quality in the Upper Swift Creek watershed. The Route 288 Corridor Plan makes no recommendations to change land uses in The Midlothian Community. Plarl, but there are proposed amendments to the County's Thoroughfare Plan within The Midlothian Community Plar~ area that are recommended. A Plan for Action The following main components are found in The Route 288 Corridor Plar); · Existing Conditions and Important Issues: This information forms the factual basis for the goals, recommendations and implementation strategies found in the Plan. · Emerging Opportunities: This section highlights changes that will be brought by Route 288 and the opportunities that are associated with its construction. · Goals: These are general statements about what is desirable for the future - what the Plan attempts to accomplish. · Recommendations: These are statements on ways to reach the goals and what actions should be taken to achieve them. · The Land Use and Transportation Plan: The Plan will be used as a guide for future development decisions. DRAFT RTl 2/23/99 ~ la la ~ Study Area Boundary No Scale Prepared by the Chesterfield County Planning Department November, 1998 Revised Draft (Map A) IRt.288 Corridor Plan THE PLAN FOR CHESTERFIELD The Route 288 Corridor Plan THE CITIZEN PARTICIPATION PROCESS The Importance of Citizen Participation In order for any plan to stand the test of time, citizens must support it. Citizen support for a plan and its concepts is built through a process of citizen involvement where citizens' viewpoints, questions and concerns are considered and taken into account. This Plan seeks to build upon the interests of citizens in the County, present and future. Public Involvement To respond to the high level of citizen and community interest in this Plan, numerous meetings were held with citizens, community groups, property owners and individuals. A mailing list was maintained of all property owners in the area, as well as anyone who requested information about the Plan or attended any meetings about the Plan. At two (2) informational meetings held in Summer 1997, approximately 180 citizens attended to find out more about the planning process and the study area. Over the course of the next ten (10) months, approximately twenty (20) smaller meetings were held with interested citizens to keep them informed about the planning process. In June 1998, the concepts of the Plan were reviewed with citizens for their input at four (4) public meetings, with a total attendance of approximately 200 people. Citizens shared ideas with staff throughout the planning process and offered staff suggestions to make this Plan one that will be successful in the future. The Route 288 Corridor Plan's successful implementation will be a joint effort by the County and community. DRAFT RT2 2/23/99 THE PLAN FOR CHESTERFIELD The Route 288 Corridor Plan EXISTING CONDITIONS AND IMPORTANT ISSUES Extensive analysis of existing conditions in the Route 288 Corridor planning area, including valuable information generated through the citizen participation process, forms the foundation for identifying key planning issues and factors. Information about the Route 288 Corridor was gathered from many sources, including field surveys and County records. An understanding of the characteristics and trends that influence development potential in the area provides a sound basis for planning and policy decisions that will shape the Route 288 Corridor's future. Key findings from the research include: · The majority of the land in the planning area is currently vacant or held in large agricultural or residential parcels; · Numerous proposed large scale development projects are zoned in or near the planning area that could have a significant effect on future growth and traffic patterns; · The area has important environmental features, including the Upper Swift Creek Reservoir watershed, streams and wetlands. Demographic and Economic Information Demographic and economic information was obtained from 1990 U. S. Census data. The data was updated where possible by using field surveys conducted by the Chesterfield County Planning Department to determine the number and type of houses in the area. Estimates of population were then based on the observed number of houses multiplied by the number of persons per household in 1990. · Population: The population of the planning area in 1997 was approximately 1,040 people, .4 percent of the 1997 Planning Department's County-wide estimate of 250,000. Income and Unemployment: 1990 Census data shows unemployment in the planning area was 2 percent, below the County-wide figure of 3.3 percent. The estimated 1990 median household income of the planning area was $66,535, above Chesterfield's $43,604. The poverty level was 2.7 percent compared to the County's 6 percent. Chart 1 Home Ownership Comparisons Study Area BOwner I Countywide ~ 0% '10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Source: Chesterfield County Planning Department/U.S. Census (1990) · Community: The community is very stable as the area is rural and has seen slow growth. Chart 1 shows that 96 percent of the planning area's residences are owner-occupied. Land Use The Route 288 Corddor planning area consists mostly of agricultural uses and vacant land. Land use data was gathered from an existing database of County real estate tax records and field surveys. There DRAFT RT3 2/23/99 THE PLAN FOR CHESTERFIELD The Route 288 Corridor Plan are 526 parcels in the planning area. The combined area of those parcels is approximately 6,943 acres; 2.4 percent of Chesterfield County's 285,702 total acres. Large Tracts: There are thirty-three (33) parcels that each exceed fifty (50) acres, and combined account for about 5,022 acres or 72 percent of the planning area's acreage. Approximately 67 percent of these parcels are zoned for agriculture and approximately 72 percent are currently vacant or used for agriculture. These tracts are located throughout the area and present opportunities for future large scale development projects. Existing Zoning: The zoning of property determines the uses that are allowed on that land. For example, property that is zoned for residential land uses will have a zoning category that begins with R. The number following the R represents the required lot size for the category (R-7 requires a minimum 7,000 square foot lot, R-9 requires a minimum 9,000 square foot lot and so on). Agricultural (A) zoning allows large lot residential uses and farm uses. It may also be the zoning category for land that has not yet been zoned to another category for development. Table 1 shows a breakdown of zoning categories for the Route 288 planning area. As shown in the table, the majority of the land in the planning area is currently zoned A. The few office and commercially zoned areas are primarily Table 1 Zoning Analysis Percentages given are rounded. Zoning Acres Pct. A (Agricultural) 4,900 71% R-7 (Residential) 481 7% R-9 921 13% R-'IS 177 3% R-25 33 0% 0-2 (Office) 149 2% C-2 (Commercial) 3 0% C-3 75 1% I-1 (Light Industry) 204 3% Rt. 288 Study Area 6,943 100% Source: Chesterfield County Planning Department located along Midlothian Turnpike with a concentration just before the Powhatan County line. Most of the industrial zoning is in the Sommerville development located on Midlothian Turnpike. r Table 2 Approved Future/Adjacent Developments Because most of the existing zoning in this area was zoned through a Conditional Use Planned Development, specific uses allowed may not be reflected through the underlying zoning category. Name Zoning and Acreage per Category Comment Acropolis ~69 iO-2 iMixed -Use development allowing office and commercial i iuses' ~'~i~'~'~'~'~i~ ...... i~'~ ............. ?~.~.~.~i.7~.~.¥~.~.~.~:~.~7~:~.~.~.~.~;i~.;~a:~.~a.~i~.~;F~.~i~i~.~i~i~i~a ......... iC-3 (41), 0-2 (400) ~mmercial uses. ~T~i~'~"T~'~ ............. ~'~:~'~f~:'~)~"~:~'~'~'~'~:'~"~:~'~:~' ........... ~'~'~a:'0';~'~i~'~i"~'~i~"~;~'~;'~;"~a ........ ~mmercial uses. This development also includes the . ~Midlothian ~mpus of John Ty er Communi~ College. ~;;~;'~[~;'""~?~'~' ......... ~'~:~'~'~'~:~';'~:~'~ ................................ ~'~'~a:~;;'~;~i;'~'~i'~'((~i~';~i~'~[~'~;';~'~'~'~a ......... ~mmercial uses. '~"~;; ........... T~'6 ............. ~.~:6..(T65~..~:~.~..~T~T~:f~..B.6:~.;t~¥;~a:.~;~.a.;;~i~b.~.~G.~gi~.~;R[i.~.[;.~.~ ................ ~ ~R~F (21.3), 0-2 (16.6), C-3 (56.7) ~mmercial outdoor recreational and publi~semi-public .... : : U~. ~;'~ii¥; ....... T~'6 ............. ~iq' ....................................................................... T~';';a:'~;;'~;~;i;~'~;~i'~'[(~;i~";;;~'; ~[~'i;'~'~;'~i~'~i ....... 'iadustdal and ~mmercial uses. limited commercial uses. Source: Chesterfield County 151anning Department Approved Area Developments: There are seven (7) major approved developments in, or immediately adjacent to, the planning area and near the proposed extension of Route 288 (see Map B). These seven (7) developments are Acropolis, CenterPointe, Charter Colony, Greensprings, The DRAFT RT4 2J23/99 DEVELOPMENTS Virginia ..... -.~- ~ "Midl~[hian Nurseries :Village~' Square ~. Charter %,~>,.. -_ INPIKE ~ Charier Co.o., .l,lothlan .. :~ :q: ~ College Charter COlony Note: The boundaries shown are approximate and for general reference only. Prepared by the Chesterfield County N Planning Department A November, 1998 No Scale Brandermill ~mill THE PLAN FOR CHESTERFIELD The Route 288 Corridor Plan Grove, Sommerville and Waterford. All of these projects have seen limited development or have not begun to develop. Land Use Analysis This land use analysis reviewed the existing use of property in the Route 288 planning area in 1998 (see Map C). It does not analyze what the land is zoned or what the property is designated for in the future. Undeveloped and Agricultural Land: This category includes vacant land and agricultural uses as well as residential uses on parcels ten (10) acres or greater. It accounts for 200 parcels and 6,285 acres, approximately 90 percent of the total acreage in the planning area. These parcels vary in size and are located throughout the planning area. Most of the land is zoned for agricultural or residential uses. Table 3 Existing Land Use Percentages given are rounded. Land Use Acres Percentage Undeveloped and 6,285 90% Agricultural Residential 445 6% Commercial 107 2% Industrial~Office 81 1% Public,Semi-Public 24 1% Total 6,943 100% Source: Chesterfield County Planning Department Residential: This includes all parcels currently used for homes on less than ten (10) acres. Residential land uses comprise 445 acres (6.4 percent) of the planning area. Approximately one-third of the residences are scattered on agriculturally zoned parcels of less than ten (10) acres in size. The remaining are in residential neighborhoods. Currently there are three (3) neighborhoods in the area: Huguenot Ridge, located on Huguenot Springs Road; Buckingham Manor, on Otterdale Road; and Otterdale, also on Otterdale Road. Huguenot Ridge has thirty (30) approved lots, six (6) of which have been developed. Buckingham Manor has developed thirteen (13) of its eighteen (18) approved lots, while Otterdale Subdivision has developed 137 of its 140 approved lots. Commercial: Commercial uses account for approximately 1.5 percent of the planning area's land use (107 acres). These uses are located along Midlothian Turnpike. The primary commercial uses are Watkins Nureery and Windy Hill Sports Complex. Watkins Nureery grows and sells plants for landscaping purposes and plans to relocate before the construction of Route 288. Windy Hill Sports Complex is on the west-bound side of Midlothian Turnpike just past Huguenot Springs Road. The complex has batting cages, miniature golf, a driving range and has recently added a nine-hole golf course. Industrial: Industrial and office land uses account for 1.2 percent or eighty-one (81) acres of the planning area's uses. These uses include the Sommerville Industrial and Office Park and a Virginia Power substation on Dry Bridge Road, one-half mile south of Midlothian Turnpike. It has several high voltage transmission wires leading to it through several properties. · Public/Semi Public: See Public Facilities on page RT 7. Environmental Factors In guiding future land use decisions in the planning area, environmental features should be considered. Swift Creek Reservoir Waterehed: The portion of the planning area south of Midlothian Turnpike is located in this 41,950 acre watershed and contains two (2) of the nine (9) major tributaries that drain to the Swift Creek Reservoir. Located west of Route 288 between Route 360 and Genito Road, the Swift Creek Reservoir covers 1,700 acres. One of Chesterfield County's three (3) principal water sources, it produces approximately eight (8) million gallons of drinking water per day for 30 percent of County citizens. The Reservoir also functions as a recreational and aesthetic resource for residents of DRAFT RT5 2/23/99 Dn~ft (M~p O) Rt. 288 Corridor Plan Existing Land Use Residential Commercial Industrial Public/Semi-Public Vacant/Agricultural Study Area Bour~dary No Scale Prepared by the Chesterfield County Planning Department June, 1998 THE PLAN FOR CHESTERFIELD The Route 288 Corridor Plan surrounding areas. At this time, the Reservoir's overall water quality is good. However, only a small portion of the Reservoir's watershed, approximately 12 percent, is developed. The remainder of the large watershed area has been recommended by County plans for significant future growth. Without adequate management, such growth could result in the generation of large amounts of nutrients and pollutants on the Reservoir. These could cause taste and odor problems in the treated water, excessive algae blooms and depleted oxygen levels, affecting fish and other aquatic organisms, the aesthetic value of the Reservoir and its viability as a drinking water supply. Further, nutrients and pollution in the Reservoir may have an economic impact as well. As water quality decreases, the cost of treatment can increase. To address all of these concerns, in 1997, the Board of Supervisors adopted a Watershed Management Plan for the area. The Watershed Management Plan includes an in-lake phosphorous limit and establishes measures such as a reduced phosphorous standard for new residential development and the construction of regional Best Management Practice(BMP) basins to filter pollutants to meet this limit. Watershed Standards and The Route 288 Corridor Plar~: Early in the planning process, citizens expressed concern about the continued health of the Upper Swift Creek Reservoir. Their concerns focused on higher intensity uses that may be allowed as a result of this Plan. In order to respond effectively to these concerns, the Environmental Engineering Department contracted with a consultant to update the land uses in the water quality model used by the County and the County's Watershed Management Committee to reflect the recommended land uses in The Route 288 Corridor Plan. The results of this modeling showed that the land use modifications anticipated by this Plan would result in an in-lake phosphorous concentration of .0501 milligrams/liter, a 1.5% increase over the concentration predicted by the original watershed committee model. VVhile both the original mode~ and the consultant's study evaluated the impact of several land use scenarios on phosphorus concentrations in the Reservoir, the values reported in this discussion refer only to average lot sizes of one half acre. This residential density was used because it is considered to be the most likely to be implemented. Tributary Streams: The Swift Creek Reservoir Watershed contains nine (9) tributary streams that lead to the Reservoir. Two (2) of these, Tomahawk Creek and Little Tomahawk Creek, drain to the Route 288 Corridor planning area. Tributary streams are important to the health of the reservoir because they can convey pollutants to the Reservoir. Further, the streams are also important environmental resources. The direct benefits of the streams include providing wildlife habitat and aesthetic value to an area. Stream water quality can be adversely affected as a result of sediment, metals and bacteria running off parking lots and other paved surfaces. In particular, the high levels of imperviousness (surfaces which do not absorb water) typically associated with commercial and high density residential growth can adversely affect streams by increasing the volume of water draining to them. This can result in a number of impacts, including stream bank erosion and sedimentation, resulting in negative impacts on aquatic organisms in the streams and affect aesthetics as well. VVhere appropriate, stream buffers can provide protection of wetland and floodplain areas which, in turn, serves to control both the quantity and quality of stormwater runoff. Topography and Soils: The topography of the planning area consists principally of flatlands and rolling hills typical of the Piedmont physiographic region. Soils in the planning area can be characterized as moderately to well drained. There are some areas, however, that are characterized by clayey or hydric soils, which do not drain well. Existing Regulations to Protect the Reservoir: The Chesapeake Bay Preservation Act, Upper Swift Creek, Floodplain and Erosion and Sediment Control Ordinances are the regulations that limit the amount of pollutants entering the Reservoir from both non-residential and residential growth. As a DRAFT RT6 2/23/99 THE PLAN FOR CHESTERFIELD The Route 288 Corridor Plan means of further reducing the amount of pollutants, the recently adopted Watershed Management Plarl for the watershed establishes a stringent phosphorus standard for new development and recommends the installation of a series of regional retention basins to filter a significant portion of the pollutants in stormwater runoff from developed land. Existing Regulations to Protect Streams: The two (2) measures to protect the streams are the County's Erosion and Sediment Control and Chesapeake Bay Preservation Act Ordinances. The first Ordinance limits the amount of sediment that is allowed to enter a stream during construction activities. The second Ordinance establishes Resource Protection Areas (RPAs) adjacent to perennial streams. The establishment of RPAs is intended to ensure an adequate buffer between environmental resouroes (such as wetlands and streams) and development. RPAs reduce and filter the pollutants in stormwater runoff. The RPA boundaries in the watershed were established by delineating an area measured from the limits of the 100 year floodplain where available or from the edge of hydric soils. As it is currently written, the Chesapeake Bay Preservation Act Ordinance allows these RPA areas to be reduced by permitting the area to be "redelineated" by measuring the area from field-delineated wetlands rather than the floodplain. In most cases, these redelineations result in a reduction in the RPA, thus affording less protection for the streams. Further, 100 year floodplain areas adjacent to non-perennial streams can be cleared. Public Facilities Facilities: There are no parks, schools, fire or rescue stations currently located in the planning area boundaries. However, the County's 1995 Public Facilities Plan recommends construction of an elementary school in the southeastern part of the planning area by the year 2015. A community park and a fire station are also planned within the planning area. John Tyler Community College: John Tyler Community College-Northern Branch will be located in the southwestern quadrant of the intersection of Charter Colony Parkway and Woolridge Road Extended. Public WaterAiVastewater Systems Existing Water and Wastewater Systems: The use of public water and wastewater systems is currently recommended for ali development within The Upper Swift Creek Plan. Provisions of the County Code and conditions of zoning, tentative subdivision and/or site plan approval may require the use of public systems. Due to the variability of construction costs and other factors, specific water and wastewater line extensions needed for future development should be discussed far in advance with the Utilities Department. Information relating to water and wastewater infrastructure may be found in The Water and Wastewater Facilities Plan. The planning area is served by several large water mains, a twenty-four (24) inch line along Midlothian Turnpike (Route 60) and a twenty-four (24) inch line along Coalfield Road. The area is also served by an existing water tank at Huguenot Springs Road. That portion of the planning area located south of Midlothian Turnpike is served by a sixty (60) inch wastewater trunk along Genito Road, the Upper Swift Creek wastewater pumping station and the Bailey's Bridge pumping station. An eighteen (18) to twenty-seven (27)inch wastewater trunk along Little Tomahawk Creek has been DRAFT RT7 2/23/99 THE PLAN FOR CHESTERFIELD The Route 288 Corridor Plan extended to serve the John Tyler Community College-Northern Campus and adjacent properties. That portion of the planning area located north of Midlothian Turnpike is served by a twenty-one (21) to thirty (30) inch wastewater trunk along Michaux Creek and by the Michaux Creek wastewater pumping station. These two (2) facilities are supported by a thirty/thirty-six (30/36) inch wastewater trunk located along the James River. That area of the Plan bordered by Midlothian Turnpike, Huguenot Springs Road and the Chesterfield/Powhatan County line cannot be served by a direct gravity line extension from the Michaux Creek system. The topography of this area dictates that it naturally drains west toward Powhatan County and would require the construction of a small pumping station to access the public wastewater system. Existing facilities are sized to provide capacity consistent with those land uses reflected in the Plan. Should more intense land uses be pursued which would be considered heavy water users and wastewater generators, detailed analyses may be necessary to address impact on the existing public water and wastewater systems. Future Water and Wastewater Systems: The County's long-standing policy "Growth Pays For Growth," as reflected in the County's Upper Swift Creek Plan is applicable in the Route 288 Corddor planning area as well. Unless the construction of a new facility is undertaken by the County (including upgrading of pumping stations and construction of water tanks) to address system reliability or water quality concerns, the majority of future water and wastewater facilities depicted on the County's Water and Wastewater Facilities Plan are anticipated to be constructed by private development interests. Current County policies may provide some rebating of construction costs to developers for off-site extensions and line over-sizing. Development within the planning area will require the extension of major water mains as well as smaller lines to serve specific sites. Major lines proposed include sixteen (16) inch and twenty-four (24) inch lines along Otterdale Road, north and south of Old Hundred Road, along Old Hundred Road, east and west of Otterdale Road, a twenty (20) inch line along Mt. Hermon Road and a twelve/twenty (12/20) inch line between Robious Road and Midlothian Turnpike. A water tank, to be located in the vicinity of DuVal Road, should provide additional system support for the planning area. The extension of major wastewater trunks, as well as sub-trunks, and collector lines wilt be required for development within the planning area. Major trunks proposed include an eighteen (18) inch to twenty- seven (27) inch trunk along Tomahawk Creek and an eighteen (18) inch to thirty-six (36) inch trunk along Swift Creek. These trunk extensions will begin at the existing sixty (60) inch trunk along Genito Road and will require smaller extensions along several upstream tributaries. Sub-trunk extensions from the Little Tomahawk and Michaux Creek trunks will be necessary to serve specific development sites. Upgrading or expansion of the Michaux Creek, Upper Swift Creek and Bailey's Bridge wastewater pumping stations will eventually be necessary as development occurs within the planning area and within The Upper Swift Creek Plan area. The proposed new and expanded facilities are sized to meet the capacity requirements anticipated by those land uses reflected in the Plan. However, should more intense uses be pursued which would require much higher water demands and generate much higher levels of wastewater flows, detailed analyses may be necessary to address system capacity issues. These analyses would need to address the ability of current water sources and treatment plant sites to meet these potential higher demands and flows. Transportation Existing Conditions: Much of the Route 288 Corridor is served by two-lane roads, such as Huguenot Springs Road, Otterdale Road, Old Hundred Road and Coalfield Road. Charter Colony Parkway, a new two- lane facility, was recently completed from the vicinity of Midlothian High School south to Coalfield Road. Midlothian Turnpike (Route 60) is the major EastNVest road in the Corridor and is a four-lane highway with a median. Traffic signals are located at its intersections DRAFT RT8 2/23/99 THE PLAN FOR CHESTERFIELD The Route 288 Corridor Plan with Old Hundred Road and Otterdale Road. The following are average daily traffic volumes on some of the major roads in the corridor: Midlothian Turnpike, west of Winterfield Road Charter Colony Parkway, south of Midlothian High School Coalfield Road between Queensmill and the YMCA Huguenot Springs Road Mount Hermon Road between Old Hundred and Hallsboro Roads Old Hundred Road between Dry Bridge and Otterdale Roads Otterdale Road between Midlothian Turnpike and Otterdale Road 23,465 (1997) 2,615 {1997) 15,370 (1997) 1,160 (1996) 340 (1996) 4,260 (1997) 2,150 (1997) Coalfield Road, which originates in the Village of Midlothian and is the primary north/south traffic carrying facility in the Corridor, is the only road that is currently operating at capacity. A Norfolk Southern rail-line runs east and west through the Corridor, south of and parallel to Midlothian Turnpike. According to the Virginia Department of Transportation's (VDOT's) Rail and Public Transportation section, this line carries two (2) trains per day. The design of Route 288 from the Powhite Parkway through the Corridor to the northern County line has been completed. Ultimately, Route 288 in the Corridor area will be a four (4) lane, interstate-style limited access facility with interchanges located at Lucks Lane/Centre Pointe Parkway, Woolridge Road Extended and Midlothian Turnpike. CollectodDistributor (C/D) roads will be provided throughout most of the Corridor. These CID roads will run parallel to the mainline lanes and will allow vehicles entering and exiting Route 288 to do so without interfering with mainline traffic. The initial phases of construction will result in a four (4) lane facility between Powhite Parkway and Midlothian Turnpike and a two (2) lane facility north of Midlothian Turnpike. Right-of-way acquisition is currently underway. First phase construction of the section between the Powhite Parkway and Midlothian Turnpike is scheduled to begin in the Fall of 1998. First phase construction of the section north of Midlothian Turnpike is scheduled for the Spring of 2000. In 1989, the Board of Supervisors adopted a County-wide Thoroughfare Plan. Changes to the 1989 Thoroughfare Plan will be necessary due to the Route 288 project and approved development in the area. Other Road Projects In The Route 288 Corridor Area: In addition to Route 288, the following are other road projects in or adjacent to the Route 288 Corridor: 1. Old Hundred Road - Between Dry Bridge Road and Otterdale Road, Old Hundred Road has narrow travel lanes and inadequate shoulders. This project will reconstruct two (2) lanes to provide adequate travel lane and shoulder widths and will improve vertical and horizontal alignments where necessary. Although this project is in the current Six Year Construction Plan, construction funds have not been allocated. 2. Woolridge Road Extended - A short section of Woolridge Road Extended has been completed connecting Charter Colony Parkway, south of Midlothian High School, with Coalfield Road at the YMCA. A further extension of Woolridge Road will connect Coalfield Road at the YMCA with Midlothian Turnpike, east of the Village of Midlothian, at the existing intersection of Midlothian Turnpike with Walton Park Road and Old Buckingham Road. When completed, this road will provide a southern Midlothian bypass and should divert a significant volume of traffic from the section of Midlothian Tumpike that passes through the Village of Midlothian. Construction is underway and should be completed by Fall 1999. 3. Charter Colony Parkway - To improve access to Midlothian High School and the future John Tyler Community College campus, westbound dual left-turn lanes and a traffic signal will be installed at the Midlothian Turnpike/Charter Colony Parkway intersection. Additional lanes will be constructed on Charter Colony Parkway, south of Midlothian Turnpike and across the DRAFT RT9 2/23/99 THE PLAN FOR CHESTERFIELD The Route 288 Corridor Plan frontage of Midlothian High School, to provide left-turn Janes at school entrances. Construction of this project is anticipated to begin in 1998. Historic Resources This area of Chesterfield County has many significant historical structures (see Map D). Most are still in use today and have been well preserved. Information on historic resources was taken from Jeffrey O'Dell's 1983 book, Chesterfield County: Eady Architecture and Historic Sites. The following list of historic sites includes all of those inventoried in the book which are still existing in the planning area. All of these structures are located near Midlothian Turnpike and are part of what was a small hamlet which centered around Hallsborough Tavern. Bethel Baptist Church (100 Huguenot Springs Road): This structure was erected in 1894 behind Hallsborough Tavern and is the only nineteenth century brick church in Chesterfield County. The building is a Gothic Revival structure with a steep, gable roof sheathed in slate. Chapel Hill (194 Huguenot Springs Road): Built in 1903 by Dr. W. D. Sydnor, this house is a central passage plan I-house featuring a front-cross gable, intedor end brick chimneys and octagonal-roofed turrets. Hallsborough Tavern (16300 Midlothian Turnpike): This structure was originally built by James Howard around 1810 to serve as a tavern and retail store. The next owner, Austin Spears, added a two story wing in 1832 to accommodate guests. This structure eventually served as the area's post office. This building has been altered several times since its original construction. Currently, it is being used for retail purposes. D RAFT RT 10 2/23/99 Study Area Boundary No Scale Prepared by the Chestedie!d County Planning Department November, 1998 Revised Draft (Map D) IRt. 288 Corridor Plan Bethel Baptist Church Chapel Hill Hallsboro Tavern Mt. Sinai Baptist Church & Cemetary THE PLAN FOR CHESTERFIELD The Route 288 Corridor Plan Mount Sinai Baptist Church (200 Old Hundred Road): Erected in 1884, this was the first church built to serve the area's African-American community. Construction funds were raised from donations and festivals. The original structure underwent major remodeling in 1948 and again in 1969. Land Character Types Based on field surveys, information provided by County Departments, maps of existing land use, the location of significant water bodies and Chesapeake Bay Resource Protection Areas, a character type inventory of the planning area was conducted as a means of classifying land areas (see Map E). Four (4) character types depict the visual environment of the planning area. Below are the character types, their definitions and significance to the area. · Forested Description: Managed forests and natural wooded areas which include a mix of pine and hardwood. Significance: Forest land is significant both environmentally and aesthetically. Environmentally, forests protect the soil, produce oxygen, provide opportunities for recreation and play a role in a variety of natural environmental systems. Forested land contributes to the rural and natural "feel" of an area and may buffer different land uses from one another. · Agriculture and Open Space Description: Cropland, open fields, pastures and recreational areas. Significance: Agricultural land uses are particularly significant to the visual quality and ambiance of an area because of the seasonal changes and variety. The textures and colors of the open fields are particularly attractive from rural roadways, especially in areas with rolling terrain. · Residential Description: Subdivisions are a grouping of suburban type housing linked by a planned road network and are marked with an identifiable entrance. Strip residential development consists of homes located along roadways, generally fronting arterials and collectors in a linear configuration. Significance: Although the planning area remains relatively undeveloped, consisting of only three (3) neighborhoods, growth is expected to occur in the next few years as the completion of Route 288 nears. · Office, Commercial and Industrial Description: Most of these uses in the planning area, which includes Watkins Nursery, are rural, family-owned businesses or are buffered and blend in with the character of the surrounding area. The exception to this is the Virginia Power substation which is significantly screened from view by forested areas. DRAFT RTl 1 2/23/99 /..,.,., THE PLAN FOR CHESTERFIELD The Route 288 Corridor Plan Significance: Currently, these uses account for a very small portion of the development in the planning area. However, upon the completion of Route 288 and other transportation improvements, these types of uses are expected to increase and become dominant in the area. DRAFT RTl 2 2./23/99 Revised Draft (Map E) Corridor Plan Map Forested Agricultural/Open Space Residential/Churches Office/Commercial/Industrial ~.~.~,~ ~ ~ ~'T~'~ 9tudy Area Boundary No Scale Prepared by the Chesterfield County Planning Department January 11, 1999 THE PLAN FOR CHESTERFIELD The Route 288 Corridor Plan EMERGING OPPORTUNITIES The completion of Route 288 from the Powhite Parkway to Interstate 64 will greatly accelerate development activity in all of northwest Chesterfield County and throughout the region. Not only will this new highway open up access to a relatively undeveloped part of Chesterfield, it will provide a direct link across the James River to Goochland County's West Creek Business Park, home of the proposed Motorola semiconductor plant and western Henrico's business district. Effective planning in this area will assure that, as growth occurs, it is properly guided, taking advantage of a prime opportunity for needed economic development, while maintaining environmental preservation and the County's high quality of life. Chesterfield and The Metropolitan Region's Economy Chesterfield County has historically been a "bedroom community" for the Richmond metropolitan area, providing a greater proportion of places to live than places to work. This has a large fiscal impact on the County, since the cost of providing services to residential development is greater than what it pays the County in taxes (see Chart 2). Business revenue to the County provides most of the additional funds necessary to provide residential services. Therefore, a balance between economic development and residential growth is important. $1,165 Chart 2 Share of Cost of County Services Per Chesterfield Household $642 · Taxes Paid by Household rlTaxes Paid by Business · Other Sources $1,930 Source: Chesterfield County Budget Department In 1997, the Chesterfield Planning Department analyzed the County's Comprehensive Plan to determine the number of acres that should be recommended for office and industrial use to meet long-range economic goals for the County. This analysis compared the County's existing share of the region's economic base and the amount of land recommended for office and industrial use in the County's adopted Comprehensive Plan. Using a moderate level growth forecast covering the period to 2044, the analysis identified a land use plan deficit of approximately 2,250 acres of land recommended for industry and 4,350 acres of land recommended for office use, totaling 6,600 additional acres necessary, but not yet designated for, office and industrial uses in the County's adopted Plans. Jobs and Location Chesterfield needs more businesses to balance residential growth and provide quality jobs for its citizens. Not all jobs are created equal; attracting "basic secto¢' jobs, like those associated with corporate offices and light industry, will be of greater benefit to the citizens of Chesterfield County. These jobs are higher paying, with better benefits, and generate spin-off employment in other economic sectors, such as retail and service. Quality jobs are especially important in the Route 288 Corridor planning area, as most of Chesterfield's workers live in the northwestern part of the County and most of Chesterfield's major employers are in the eastern part of Chesterfield. DRAFT RTl 3 2/23/99 THE PLAN FOR CHESTERFIELD The Route 288 Corridor Plan Timing of Development Typically, the demand for residential construction in highway corridors precedes the market for corporate office and light industrial uses. This area is anticipated to have residential demand due to the development of employment centers at West Creek in Goochland, large employment centers in western Henrico and a scarcity of land designated for residential development in Goochland and Henrico. With the construction of Route 288, Chesterfield County will only be a short commute over the new James River bridge. There may also be interest in retail development along Midlothian Turnpike, as businesses consider the potential of attracting commuters from Route 288. However, commercial development is already developed nearby at Chesterfield Towne Center, with additional space already planned and zoned at the Route 288~360 interchange area and east and west of Midlothian Village. Planning and Design Issues The future design and configuration of development in the Route 288 corridor is critical to Chesterfield County. Well-planned and constructed development, consolidated and coordinated to the maximum extent possible, will promote a stronger tax base, an aesthetically pleasing environment and the cost effective provision of County services. Most quality, large-scale suburban office and light industrial development in the Richmond region is found in "corporate parks," such as the Arboretum and the Boulders off Midlothian Turnpike in Chesterfield County, Innsbrook in Richmond's west end and the new West Creek Corporate Park in eastern Goochland County. Common to these developments are basic features that characterize good design and planning including generous landscaping, well designed entrances, use of curbs and gutters along streets, a mix of building heights, effective lighting and parking. Many of these corporate centers have their own strict development standards but, at the same time, incorporate enough flexibility to accommodate market demand. In many cases, a combination of local zoning requirements, improvements proffered by the center's developer at the time of rezoning and deed covenants established by the developer combine to ensure good design and planning. Well-designed corporate centers play an important part in the success of attracting desirable economic development in a regionally and nationally competitive environment. Haphazard and incremental commercial development, especially industrial uses characterized by prefabricated metal buildings, inadequate landscaping and outside storage visible from public areas, can be detrimental to attracting new businesses to an area. DRAFT RTl4 2/23~9 THE PLAN FOR CHESTERFIELD The Route 288 Corridor Plan Another important factor to successful corporate park design is finding parcels of land large enough to accommodate a large-scale plan of development. Property owners interested in developing their land often find it is more profitable to group together a number of smaller adjacent parcels into one (1) significant holding. When the market is right, this approach can attract quality, large-scale corporate park development and discourage the piecemeal commercial "stripping" of development along major highways. Where practical and appropriate, the design of commercial uses can incorporate elements from nearby historic buildings, creating a common area theme that helps contribute to community continuity. Effective design also takes into consideration adjacent land character types. DRAFT RTl 5 2r23/99 THE PLAN FOR CHESTERFIELD The Route 288 Corridor Plan A PLAN FOR ACTION L Goals The vision of the Route 288 Corridor Plan is to effectively guide future development in a way that promotes maximum benefit to Chesterfield County's current and future citizens, while recognizing the importance of property rights, healthy neighborhoods, environmental preservation and the County's high quality of life. The goals listed below foster this vision and establish a framework for the Plan's more specific recommendations. A. Basic Principles 1. Recognize the pdme importance of the Route 288 Corridor to Chesterfield County's economic future. 2. Take advantage of the benefits to Chesterfield County that Route 288 will have as a primary component of the region's transportation system. 3. Chart a future for the area that takes into account both the interests of the current community and the long-term welfare of all Chesterfield citizens. B. Orderly Growth 1. Guide each type of development to the most appropriate area by following the County's Comprehensive Plan. 2. Discourage development that may be detrimental to long-term economic and environmental goals. 3. Minimize the cost of public facilities by promoting orderly and efficient development. 4. Only approve development proposals supported by public utilities. C. Transportation 1. Provide a safe, efficient and cost-effective transportation system. 2. Control development densities within the Corridor so that smooth flow of traffic is provided on Route 288 and on major arterial and collector streets. 3. Provide for the construction of additional major arterial and collector streets as development occurs to mitigate the increase in traffic generated by development in the Corridor. 4. Properly locate and limit the number of access points to major arterial and collector streets. 5. Encourage pedestrian activity at appropriate locations in the Corridor. D. Economic Opportunities 1. Maximize the economic development potential of the Route 288 Corridor as a prime location for basic sector employment, such as corporate office and light industrial uses. 2. Take advantage of the potential for spin-off economic development from other major employment centers in the region, especially those opportunities for high-tech industry and corporate office centers. 3. Work to provide more basic sector jobs closer to the population centers in northern Chesterfield County. 4. Identify large parcels that are suitable for industrial development. 5. Protect sites identified for industrial use from encroaching residential and retail development. 6. Identify and market parcels appropriate for economic development. E. Resource Protection 1. Maintain the environmental quality of the area. DRAFT RTl6 2J23/99 THE PLAN FOR CHESTERFIELD The Route 288 Corridor Plan 2. Protect water quality in the Upper Swift Creek Reservoir watershed, as well as in the area's perennial and non-perennial streams. 3. Encourage development to accommodate and preserve existing landscape where possible. 4. Protect historic resources in the area bY promoting historic designation of identified structures and encouraging development to preserve historic structures. F. Housing 1. Promote housing development that will meet the needs of future residents and businesses. 2. Where residential development is appropriate, strive for a mix of housing options that will complement the County's economic development initiatives. G. Community Character and Design 1. Enhance the aesthetic quality of the area through quality design. 2. Encourage public safety through the effective design of development. 3. Encourage development design that promotes community character. II. Recommendations The following recommendations are the specific actions required to carry out the Route 288 Corridor Plan. These recommendations, combined with the land use plan that follows, will help guide the future of the Route 288 Corridor area. However, these recommendations will require cooperation between businesses, industries, residents and government to make them successful. A. Land Use 1. Land Use Plan: Follow the land use recommendations of the Route 288 Corridor Plan to guide future decision making. Aggregation: Through the zoning process, encourage owners interested in selling smaller land parcels in the Route 288 Corridor to join with adjacent property owners to aggregate land holdings large enough to accommodate a large-scale plan of development. Incompatible Uses: Residential land uses should be discouraged in areas designated for non- residential areas in this Platt (areas designated for light industrial, office or commercial land uses) and vice versa, except where those uses are permitted by right. B. Quality Design Large-Scale Development: Encourage large-scale development projects of quality design which follow an office park-planned development approach (i.e., Arboretum, Moorefield, Boulders). These projects should also include an internal road network and controlled access. Design Standards: Adopt amendments to the County's Design Standards Manual creating an overlay district for the Route 288 Corridor Plan area in all Regional Employment Center land use areas (see Map F) which would: a) Increase landscaping required in front and corner setbacks for new development. b) Require curb and gutter in all new developments. c) Allow building heights of up to 150 feet. d) Require new development adjacent to Route 288 to orient buildings so that the views of buildings from Route 288 will not be of loading docks, storage areas, etc. e) Require developers to design attractive wet ponds for Best Management Practices (BMPs) that can be incorporated into developments as amenities. DRAFT RTl 7 2/23/99 THE PLAN FOR CHESTERFIELD The Route 288 Corridor Plan f) Enhance requirements for quality architecture. g) Require developments in I-2 Districts to pave their parking lots. h) Limit outdoor storage uses in I-2 Districts. i) Encourage pedestrian access in and around projects and a plan for linking pedestrian access to adjacent properties. 3. Safety: All development proposals should be designed to accommodate public safety needs. Urban Design: The area closest to the Route 288/60 interchange may be appropriate for an urban or neo-traditional scaled and designed development. This concept may include reduced setbacks, formal landscaping, pedestrian access, superior architectural design and other features that are representative of this urban or neo-traditional design. A quality development of this type could be submitted and processed through the County's CUPD (Conditional Use Planned Development) process. C. Economic Growth Proactive Zoning: Because of the economic development opportunities available in this area, not present in other areas of the County, there may be situations where the County would like to encourage development. Additional study of proactive rezoning should be conducted following the adoption of The Route 288 Corridor Plan. 2. Opportunity: The Department of Economic Development should continue to identify prime sites in the area and pursue proven developers to build quality office and business parks. Jobs: The Department of Economic Development should determine which types of economic activities (i.e., corporate and divisional headquarters, research and development, light manufacturing, distribution, back office operations, office/office showroom, etc.) will create the best job opportunities (payroll) for County citizens and generate significant tax revenues to Chesterfield County and pursue those uses for the Route 288 planning area. Marketing: The Economic Development Department should develop and implement a marketing plan to capitalize on location advantages of the Route 288 Corridor, such as its proximity to workers, John Tyler Community College, major roads and Motorola's West Creek Campus. D. Public Facilities Utilities Study: A detailed utilities study should be undertaken to address possible demand/capacity issues, if uses are pursued that are more intense than those reflected by the Plan. 2. Water/Wastewater Ordinance: The County should adopt an Ordinance for this area requiring mandatory hook-up to County water and wastewater at the time of development. 3. Policing Office: As the surrounding communities grow and develop, an appropriate location for a policing office should be identified and permitted in a central, strategic location. 4. Fire/Rescue Facility: A fire/rescue station is planned within the area of Midlothian Turnpike and Route 288 to meet the existing and future demands for service and response time standards. E. Transportation Thorou~_hfare Plan: Amend the County's Thoroughfare Plan in the Route 288 Corridor, as shown on Map F, and use the amended Plan as the guide for transportation recommendations on development proposals. D RAFT RT 18 2/23/99 THE PLAN FOR CHESTERFIELD The Route 288 Corridor Plan Mitigating Road Improvements: Development proposals within the Corridor should provide mitigating road improvements, to include right-of-way dedication, construction of turn lanes, installation of traffic signalization and shoulder improvements. Access to Arterial and Collector Roads: Through the zoning, site plan review and subdivision review processes, control access to major arterial and collector roads through shared access, adequate access separation and traffic control devices to maintain orderly and efficient traffic flow. 4. Traffic Noise Abatement: Provide setbacks for future sound-sensitive land uses, such as residential development along Route 288, to reduce traffic noise impacts. 5. Pedestrian Access: Develop a network of sidewalks, in accordance with the County's Sidewalk Policy, to provide for pedestrian travel. Route 288 Funding: The funds that have been allocated for the Route 288 project will provide a four (4) lane facility between Powhite Parkway and Midlothian Turnpike and a two (2) lane facility north of Midlothian Turnpike. The County should aggressively pursue completion of Route 288. F. Environmental Resources Vegetation: Through the zoning process, encourage developers to disturb as little landscape and plant life as possible around the entrances and fringes of the project area and bodies of water to preserve the area's environmental character and the natural erosion and pollutant controls provided by the undisturbed vegetation. Upper Swift Creek Ordinance: Review and consider the following in conjunction with the Watershed Management Plan and Maintenance Program for the Swift Creek Reservoir: a) Restrict reductions in the pro-established Resource Protection Area (RPA) boundaries. b) Prohibit tree removal, clearing or filling in the 100 year floodplain adjacent to perennial and intermittent streams. c) Limit clearing and construction on slopes greater than 20 percent within, or contiguous to, Resource Protection Areas (RPAs). Regional BMPs: If development does take place on a site that iS expected to be served by a regional BMP facility, staff will assist the developer in identifying a regional site and will attempt to facilitate discussions among the developer and other landowners for a regional facility. However, staff will not require a regional facility unless the developer and other landowners agree on a voluntary regional approach. If such an agreement is not reached, the developer will be required to provide a BMP facility for his own site. New Development Prior to the Regional BMP Master Plan: New development that takes place prior to the adoption of the Regional BMP Master Plan (Watershed Master Plan and Maintenance Program) currently being developed for the Swift Creek Reservoir Watershed must be encouraged to construct regional BMP facilities where there are technically feasible sites and the County should take reasonable steps and actions to protect and promote those sites. When the BMP Master Plan is adopted, new development must comply with the BMP Master Plan. The County should adopt the BMP Master Plan as soon as possible. Future Water Quality Technologies: For rezoning requests in the Upper Swift Creek watershed portion of The Route 288 Corddor Plan area, developers should be encouraged, through the use of voluntary proffers, to conform to possible future water quality protection measures and/or technologies. DRAFT RTl 9 2/23/99 THE PLAN FOR CHESTERFIELD The Route 288 Corridor Plan G. Housing and Community 1. Housing Types: Evaluate whether revisions to the County's residential zoning ordinances wou~d encourage a mix of housing options for new workers, complementing the County's economic development initiatives. H. Historic Resources 1. Preserve Structures: Bethel Baptist Church and Hallsborough Tavern, historic structures, should be preserved. Any adjacent development is encouraged to be architecturally compatible. Historic Area: Create an area around Bethel Baptist Church and Hallsborough Tavern, as shown on Map F. Any development in this area is encouraged to incorporate the design characteristics of these historic structures to preserve the historic character of the area. The goal of this area is to maintain the sense of place at this intersection created by Hallsborough Tavern and Bethel Baptist Church: a) On the north side of Midlothian Turnpike, development is encouraged to incorporate design features from the existing historic properties, including building scale, architectural design and texture. Further, development in this area is encouraged to incorporate pedestrian access and sidewalks. b) On the south side of Midlothian Turnpike, properties adjacent to Midlothian Turnpike are encouraged to be similar in scale and architecture to Hallsborough Tavern and Chapel Hill. Development in the remainder of this portion of the historic district may be larger in scale but not overwhelming to the smaller-scale development. Historic Designations: The Chesterfield County Preservation Committee should work with the property owners of Bethel Baptist Church and Chapel Hill to have these properties designated as County historic landmarks. Historic and Cultural Significance: The Chesterfield County Preservation Committee should recognize Mount Sinai Baptist Church and Cemetery for their historic and cultural significance to the County, including a plaque at the site explaining the story and significance of the church and initiate steps to designate it as a historic landmark. IlL The Land Use Plan The land use plan for the Route 288 Corridor is a guide for future change. The land use plan illustrates the recommended future development pattern for the Route 288 Corridor area (see Map F). This map will be a useful guide for the future land use and rezoning decisions. Land use categories, their definitions and key features of recommended uses are presented in Chart 3. Successfully implemented, this land use plan will: Target key land in the northwestern part of Chesterfield County for office, light industrial and corporate park uses; in turn, strengthening the County's tax base and providing new employment opportunities. Promote a land use development pattern that takes best advantage of Route 288's links to the region's transportation system while, at the same time, providing effective transition between new uses and adjacent communities. In the portion of The Route 288 Corridor Plen area that drains to the Swift Creek Reservoir, maintain the current in-lake phosphorous limit and the reduced phosphorous standard for new residential development, as outlined in the County's 1997 Watershed Management Plan. DRAFT RT20 2/23/99 THE PLAN FOR CHESTERFIELD The Route 288 Corridor Plan The land use plan offers guidance to County staff, elected officials and citizens as new development proposals are brought forward and evaluated. For example, if a landowner is interested in developing his vacant property, which is currently zoned for Agricultural (A) uses, the land use plan will be consulted by staff as they determine their recommendation for the rezoning. If the rezoning request does not comply with the land use designation on the land use plan, staff is not likely to recommend approval of the request. Generally, the land use plan does not recommend changes to the zoning of any land. However, as outlined in the land use recommendations, if the Board of Supervisors chooses to rezone property in this area, this land use plan will be used as a guide. DRAFT RT21 2/23/99 THE PLAN FOR CHESTERFIELD The Route 288 Corridor P/an Chart 3 LAND USE CATEGORIES The categories shown on Map F are described below. Because land use plans are a general guide for recommended future growth, all uses that could possibly be developed cannot be listed here. More detailed information on potential uses can be found in the corresponding categories (i.e., 0-2) of the Chesterfield County Zoning Ordinance. · Residential (One (1) dwelling or less per acre): Residences, and under certain circumstances, places of worship, schools, parks and other similar public facilities. · Residential (One (1) to two and a half (2 1/2) dwellings per acre): Residences, and under certain circumstances, places of worship, public schools, parks and other similar public facilities. · Office/Residential Mixed Use: Professional and administrative offices (0-2), residential developments of varying densities, and light industry (I-1). Under certain circumstances, supporting small-scale, retail uses may be incorporated into a larger development. · Office: Professional and administrative offices (0-2). Under certain circumstances, supporting small-scale, retail uses may be incorporated into a larger development. · Convenience Commercial (not shown on Plan): Limited retail, service and office uses (C-1 and O-1) mainly serving nearby neighborhoods or rural locations, generally located at the intersection of through streets (the intersection of two (2) collectors or a collector and an arterial as designated in the Thoroughfare Plan), provided adequate spacing is provided. In developing areas, they should be planned in conjunction with new residential projects. · Neighborhood Mixed Use: Neighborhood-oriented commercial uses (C-2), including small shopping centers. · Light Industrial/Flex: Offices, warehouses and light industrial uses (I-1 and some I-2 uses), including research and development uses as well as flex space. Under certain circumstances, supporting small-scale, retail uses may be incorporated into a larger development. · Regional Employment Center: Office, research and development uses, warehouses and light industrial uses (I-1). Moderate industrial uses may be appropriate in some locations if appropriate access, buffering and land use transitions are provided. Under certain circumstances, supporting ......... s.m..al!-.s.c.al.e; .re.t.a!l .u.s.e.s.m..ay..b.e.i.n .c .or.p.o.r .at.e.d.i.n!o..a.la. r.g.e.r .d.e.v.el.o.p.m.e.n. t: ................... Midlothian Area Community_ Land Use And Trans.oortation Plan: The shaded area on Map F shows recommended land uses from this Pler~, as adopted in 1989 and amended in 1992. It is shown here for information purposes only and is not recommended for revision. · Residential Medium Density (1.01 to 2.5 units/acre): Housing types will be predominantly single family detached units and may also include schools and playgrounds, places of worship and isolated neighborhood service uses. · Planned Transition Area: This area is appropriate for mixed-use development that contributes to an overall transition to a smaller-scale, pedestrian-oriented environment in Midlothian Village. Pdmary uses will include office, medium-density housing (7-14 units/acre), personal services and community facilities. · Suburban Commercial District: Suburban, auto-oriented design district to include retail shopping centers, office-service establishments and similar uses. Note 1: The existing single family residential uses should be maintained and protected until appropriate redevelopment occurs in compliance with the recommended regional employment center land use designation. Zoning standards and proffers shall be used to protect the residential character until the property owners develop this area for the planned land uses. See Appendix B for the properties covered by this note. Note 2: A regional scale high fashion mall or lifestyle center can be appropriate at this quadrant if: · integrated with the regional employment center uses, · the majority of the anchor stores serve a metropolitan-wide market. Neighborhood retail uses may be appropriate if integrated with the other designated uses. DRAFT RT22 2/23/99 Appendix A TECHNICAL MEMORANDU~,~ ~HtLL PREPARED FOR: PREPARED BY: DATE: Kramer Model Update for 1-288 Corridor Changes Joan Salvafi /Chesterfield Counn' And.rea Ryon/CH2M HILL Fernando Pasquel/Cl-I2M HILL March 3, 1998 In 1994, Mary, K. ramer, a member of the Chesterfield Coun ,fy Watershed Management Committee, developed a spreadsheet model (Kramer model) to evaluate the imp.acts of development within the Upper Swift Creek watershed on water quahty in Swift Creek Reservoir. The purpose of Mrs. Kramer's modeling effort was to evaluate if a phosphorus export goal of 0.22 lb/ac/yr from new residential land uses and 0.45 lb/acre/yr from new nonresidential land uses was sufficient to prevent in-take vhosvhorus concenrranons/rom exceeding 0.05 rog/L, a ievei considered suirabie to conrroiling eurrophicanon in the reservoir. For existing land uses, watershed pollutant loading factors from two different sources were used: Swift Creek Reservoir Watershed sVadv (CDM, 1989) and CBLAD's factors listed in the Chesterfield County, Calculation Procedures Manual. The empirical Reck.how r~,!~tionship for southeastern U.S. reservoirs was used to estimate the median summer in- lake total phosphorus concentration. Mrs. Kramer analyzed six different scenarios existing land use · zoned land use · proposed land use (zoning plus additional proposed projecrs~ · proposed land use with remainder of Counn' bulk out with ~= acre residennai lots · proposed land use with remainder of Counn' buiit our with i acre residential lots · proposed land use with remainder of Counn' built out with 0.5 acre residential lots Since the Kramer model was developed, zoning changes within the 1-288 corridor have been proposed. Because these changes include shifts from residential uses to non-residential uses, total phosphorus loads calculated in the Kramer model would be expected to increase with the new land uses. To evaluate these changes, the model was re-nm with the proposed 1-288 corridor land use changes. A meeting was held with Planning Department, Department of Environmental Engineering, Economic Development Department and CH2M HILL staff to identify, the differences between the land uses in the existing Kramer model and the proposed land uses in the 1-288 corndor. The modifications to the model required to reflect the new 1-288 corridor land uses are summarized in Table !. WOC/030398~.~OC 131400 FOR ~-2~ CORRIDOR CHANG£S TABLE 1 - CHANGES IN LAND USE BETWEEN KRAMER MODEL AND PROPOSED 1-288 CORRIDOR DEVELOPMENT Subtract ! Add 300 acre Watkins commercial properly i 1408 acres moderate industrial land use 300 acre commercial deveioDment along Rou[e 50 i 420 acres light inciustnal land use t682 acres of 2.2 du/ac resiDentIal area I 454 rmxed use land use Equivalent Changes for Residential and Nonresidential Land Uses Subtract ! Add 600 acres nonres~demial and 1682 acres of res~oenuat I 2282 acres of nonresidential These modifications were made to the model in order to evaluate the impact on phosphorus loads. The change was applied to the following 4 cases: · proposed land use (zoning plus additional proposed projects) · proposed land use with remainder of County built out with 5 acre residential lots · proposed land use with remainder of County built out with 1 acre residential lots · proposed land use with remainder of County built out with 0.5 acre residential lots The total phosphorus loads and the resuidn§ phosphorus concentration in the reservoir are sixown in Table 2 £or the original Kramer model and for the modified model. In addition, the % differences between the original calculations and the modified calculations are shown. TABLE 2 · MODEL RESULTS FOR ORIGINAL AND MODIFIED MODEL Proposed Proposed with Proposed with Proposed with 5-acre build-out 1-acre build-out 0.5-acrs build-out Loading factors based on 1989 Swift Creek Reservoir Waterst~ed Study Waterstqed Phosphorus Ioaa (Ibtyr) Odginal model 10,525 16,801 16,221 16,221 Modified model 10,912 17,188 16,608 16,608 % change 3.7 2.3 2.4 2.4 Phosphorus concentration ~n reservoir !mg/Ll Odginal model 0.039 Modified model 0.040 % change 2.3 0.056 0.051 0.049 0.056 0.052 0.050 1.4 1.5 1.5 Loading Pactor~ based on CBLAD Watershed Phosphorus Load (lblyr) Original model 8,992 Modified model 9,379 % change 4.3 14,254 14,254 14,254 14,641 14,641 14,641 2.7 2.7 2.7 Phosphorus concentration in reservoir (rog/L) Original model 0.039 Modified model 0.040 % change 2.6 0.055 0.050 0.049 0.055 0.051 0.050 1.6 1.7 3.1 ,','DC/030398ME.DCC For the proposed zoning condition, zorung modifications in the 1-288 comdor increase the annual phosphorus load to the reservoir approxurtately 4 %. This change increases the calculated phosphorus concentration m the reservoir from 0.039 mg/L to 0.040 mg/L, an increase of 2.3 - 2.6 percent, which is approximately 80% of the 0.05 rog/L goal. For the three build-out conditions, the calculated in-take phosphorus concentrations were near or above 0.05 mg/L for the ong~nai Kramer model. The modifications increased these estimated concentrations between 1 to $ %. · NOC~)30398ME.DOC 3 Appendix B CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Meeting Date: March 10; 1999 Item Number: 8. c. 14. Subject: Consideration of an Application for a Three (3) Year Federal U.S. Department of Commerce: National Telecommunications and Information Administration Grant for Telecommunications and Information Infrastructure Assistance Program (TIIAP) County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Authorize the Police Department to apply for a Federal U.S. Department of Commerce grant which will provide funding for digital telephones to the Police Department and to appropriate the necessary funds when approved. Summary of Information: The purpose of this grant is to obtain the vitally needed digital telephone communications equipment essential to maintaining the high standard of confidentiality of information being called into the Police Department's Records Management System (RMS) and to expedite the reporting of information into the RMS System so the police officers can spend more time on the streets performing their duties of protecting the citizens and property of Chesterfield County. This grant will provide federal funds of approximately $424,200 with an in- kind county match. Preparer: ~ ~ Title: Chief of Police Colonel Carl R. Baker Attachments: Yes No CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 2 of 2 Meetino Date: March 10. 1999 Number Bud.qet and Mana.qement Comments: This item requests Board approval for the Police Department to apply for and appropriate, if received, grant funding from the Department of Commerce. This grant will provide funding totaling $424,400 towards the purchase of 400 digital phones ($39,600), associated estimated air- time usage ($255,000), and 36 months for the monthly service fee ($129,600). The local match totaling $535,300 is an in-kind match including discounted costs on air-time usage ($280,500), discounted costs on the digital phone ($40,000), discounted monthly service fee ($100,800), tower space for antennae ($60,000), and land for tower sites ($54,000). The subject grant is for a three-year period during which time all ongoing operating costs will be covered. Prior to grant expiration, FY2003, funds will need to be identified for the ongoing costs. Ongoing costs for the County will include the discounted air- time(S85,000), and the discounted monthly service fee ($43,200), totaling $128,200. Preparer: Rebecca T. Dickson Title: Director, Budget & Mana,qement CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Meetin~ Date: March 10, 1999 Item Number: $. C. ]_5. Subject: Amendment to Highway Priority List to Include Removal of Tolls for Powhite Parkway Extension County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: The Board is requested to approve an addition to the Highway Priority List for removal of the tolls on the Powhite Parkway Extension. Summary. of information: Mr. Warren asked staffto prepare an agenda item to add removal of the tolls on the Powhite Parkway Extension in Chesterfield County to the Highway Priority List adopted by the Board at the February 24, 1999 meeting. The Technical Committee of the Richmond MPO recently recommended a list of priority projects to the MPO which included the removal of the tolls on the Powhite Parkway Extension in Chesterfield County. Recommendation: Staff recommends the Board approve the addition of the removal of tolls from the Powhite Parkway Extension to the Highway Priority List. District: Countywide Preparer: Title: ~.J. McCracken Agen382 Attachments: Yes ~-~ No Director of Transportation CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS RECOMMENDED PRIORITY LIST OF HIGHWAY PROJECTS February 24, 1999 COST IN PRIORITY PROJECT DESCRIPTION FROM TO MILLIONS C. Route 1 1-95 $2.1 4 Route 60 6 Lanes Courthouse Rd. Old Buckingham Rd. $11.0 1-295 Interchange Meadowville Rd. -- $20.0 Powhite Pky. 4 Lanes Route 288 Coalfield Rd. $5.0 ICentralia Road Ilntersect. Impr. 1Route 10 IChester Rd. I $4-01 8 New Freeways PreL Engr. & A. Coalfield Rd. Route 360 $1.5 (Powhite Pky. Ext., Right-of-Way B. Powhite Pky. Ext. 1-95 $4.5 EastJWest, C. East/West Freeway 1-85 $1.0 North/South) 9 New Freeway Prel. Engr. 10 Route 360 6 Lanes Signalization Var. Locations Sight & Sound Powhite Pky., Barriers Route 288, Park/Ride Commuter Facilities Parking Lots 1-95 1-295 $0.8 A. Winterpock Rd. Woodlake Pky. $4.8 B. Woodlake Pky. Otterdale Rd. $10.3 Countywide -- $1.0 Countywide -- $15.0 Countywide -- $0.5 14 Remove Toils Powhite Pk¥. Ext. $60.0 TOTAL $235.5 Project included in VDOT's Current Six Year Improvement Program. * Route 360 from Swift Creek to Winterpock Road - P.E. only, no Construction Funds * Route 10 from 1-95 to Meadowville Road - P.E. only, no Construction Funds Project Recommended to be Added CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Meeting Date: March 10, 1999 Item Number: 8.a.16. Subject: Change Effective Date of Subdivision Ordinance Amendment Regarding New Road Stripping Rules. County. Administrator's Comments: County_ Administrator; ~'~ Board Action Requested: Refer attached Subdivision Ordinance Amendment to change the effective date to the Planning Commission for public hearing and recommendation and set Board public hearing for April 28,1999. Summary_ of information: The attached Subdivision Ordinance amendment will rescind the definition of frontage and subdivision adopted by the Board of Supervisors on November 12, 1998, and reenact these new standards with an effective date of the date of adoption (public hearing set for April 28, 1999). The purpose of review is to consider the appropriate effective date of these standards, not to review or modify the adopted standards. New design standards were adopted by the Board of Supervisors for "road-strip" lots on November 12, 1998. These lots are large lots in the Agricultural Zoning District that are exempt from subdivision requirements. There have been difficulties in the implementation of these standards. Several parcels have been surveyed and divided, however the recordation of several lots did not occur until they were sold. Preparer: Thomas E. Jaco~f~ Title: Director of Planning C:DATAJAGENDA/1999/MAR 1099.4/GOK Attachments: Yes ~No CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 2 of 2 '~ AGENDA Meeting Date: March 10, 1999 Item Number: Summary_ of Information: (Continued) Therefore, the division of large land tracts that were designed before the adoption of the new standards have lots which have been sold to new prospective homebuilders which cannot meet these standards. Citizens have purchased lots for which the County cannot approve their building permits applications. See attached map. The owners of Lots 13 and 14 cannot meet the adopted standards while adjacent lots 10, 11 and 12 meet the adopted standards. Several solutions are possible: 1. The property owners can combine and purchase additional property to meet the current standards, 2. The property owners can rezone and subdivide the property, 3. The County could rescind and readopt these' new standards, therefore changing the effective date of the new standards to a future date. In the Agricultural districts, property owners have the right to subdivide their property as they so choose. There is no review nor approval of rural land splits by the Planning Department before recordation, as is required through the subdivision review process on residentially zoned property. Prepared by 500 0 IOO0 AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE CODE OF THE COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD, 1997, AS AMENDED, BY AMENDING AND REENACTING SECTION 17-2 RELATING TO THE DEFINITIONS OF FRONTAGE AND SUBDIVISION BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County: (1) That Sections 17-2 of the Code of the County of Chesterfield, 1997, as amended, are amended and reenacted to read as follows: Sec. 17-2 Definitions. In the construction of this chapter, the definitions contained inthis section shall be observed and applied, except when the context clearly indicates otherwise: OOO Frontage: The continuous length of the property line of any lot, lots, parcel or tract of land measured along a single public street, road or highway against which the land abuts. 000 Subdivision: The division of any parcel of land for residential use, into two or more lots any one of which is less than five acres, or which has road frontage on which its access is located of less than 300 feet or 250 feet if an shared access shared by no more than two lots or parcels is used, or which does not maintain a minimum width of 300 feet. or 250 feet if an access shared by no more than two lots or parcels is used, for a depth of I000 feet or that n~cessary to create a 5 acre parcel, for the purpose, either immediate or future, of transfer of ownership or development for residential use including condominium development. "':--:~,,v,~,~.--' .... ,~"'-,,.~,-- j .,~"-- ~'.~ ............ t,~,, },,~ of _C.~ranting or extinguishing .... : ..... :-' _ ~L,,.~..~..~.~ of easements, and divisions of land not directed al~ the creation of lots or parcels for sale resulting from augmented estates, creditor/mechanics' lien suits, condemnations., assignment~, involuntary. _Dartitions-..iudicial sales, ~,~ ~,~,,,~ ~,,,,.~,,~,, or ~,~,,~, ~,~ ,~.~,..,,~ ~h~ lien priorities-property oftiens, plats of confirmation and ooen space r rements sera[wu umsatws a ut ll,[~ creation - e, ............. ,_ ~,, ,,~ ,,, ~,,,,,.~,= for sale, shall not be considered as an act of subdivision, as long as such division is not done for the purpose of circumventing this chapter. The term "subdivision" shall not include a single division of land into parcels where such division is for the purpose of a sale or gif~ to a member of the immediate family of the property owner including a partition of property owned by immediate family memlp~rs. Only one such division shall be allowed per family member and shall not be for the purpose of circumventing this chapter. For the purpose of this subsection, a member of the immediate family shall be defined as any 1014:44069.1 1 person who is a natural or legally defined offspring, spouse, sibling, grandchild, grandparent or parent of the owner. With respect to family subdivision all applicable requirements of the zoning ordinance shall be met and the proposed tot p~trcel shall conform to the design standards set forth in this chapter. (2) That this ordinance shall become effective immediately upon adoption. The original adoption of this ordinance on November 12, 1998 shall be void. 1014:44069.1 2 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of Meeting Date: March 10, 1999 Item Number: 8.C.17. Subject: Revoke Authorization for Sprint PCS to Apply for Communications Antenna on Robious Water Tank and Withdraw Application County_ Administrator's Comments: County. Administrator: Board Action Requested: Mr. Barber, Midlothian District Supervisor, requests the Board to 1) revoke its authorization for Sprint PCS to apply for substantial accord and a conditional use planned development with height and setback exceptions for communications antenna to be installed on the Robious Water Tank and 2) to withdraw the pending applications for such substantial accord and CUPD approval. Summary_ of information: On September 23, 1998, the Board of Supervisors authorized Sprint PCS to apply for substantial accord and zoning approval for communication equipment on the Robious Water Tank. Subsequently, Sprint PCS paid the appropriate fees and filed Case 99PD0218 and Case 99SN0193. Several meetings have been held and significant opposition exists to the proposed communication equipment from the surrounding neighborhood. These cases have been deferred twice by the Planning Commission at their January and February meetings due to neighborhood opposition. The Planning staff has recommended approval of both cases. The Sprint communication equipment is proposed to be located on an existing water tank located just west of Comer Rock Road in Roxshire Subdivision. It is in the middle of a solid and stable residential neighborhood. See attached map. Preparer: Attachments: Yes ~No Title: Director of Planning C :DATA'AGENDA\ 1999LMAR 1099.5 \GOK 99PD0218 2 IAL ACCORD Meeting Date: March 10, 1999 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page __ Item Number: 1of 1 8.C.1 8. Subject: Transfer of Bermuda District Three Cent Road Funds for Thomas Dale High School Graduation Party County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Transfer $1,000 in Bermuda District Three-Cent Road Funds to the School Board to be used for the Thomas Dale High School 1999 Graduation Party. Summary of Information: Mr. McHale has requested that the Board transfer $1,000 in Bermuda District Three Cent Road Funds to the School Board to be used for the Thomas Dale High School Class of 1999 Graduation Party sponsored by Thomas Dale High School. The transfer must be contingent on the money being placed in school operating accounts to be applied to appropriate after-graduation activities. The School board must also write checks directly to vendors who will be supplying goods or services to after-graduation events. The balance in the Bermuda Three-Cent Road Fund account is $7,937; use of $1,000 will leave an available balance of $6,937. Preparer: {/(..~ ~/.~ ( Title: Rebecca T. Dickson Attachments: · Yes [] No Director, Budget and Management 0407:43581.1 1# THREE CENT ROAD FUND This application must be completed and signed before the County can consider a request for funding with Three Cent Road Funds. Completing and signing this form does not mean that you will receive funding or that the County can legally consider your request. Virginia law places substantial restrictions on the authority of the County to give public funds, such as Three Cent Road Funds, to private persons or organizations and these restrictions may preclude the County's Board of Supervisors from even considering your request. What is the name of the applicant (person or organization) making this funding request? If an organization is the applicant, what is the nature and purpose of the organization? 4(c(Also attach organization's most recent articles of incorporation and/or bylaws to application.) What is the amount of funding you are seeking? O,N,] Describe in detail the funding request and how the money, if approved, will be spent. FOO_h ~.'TO. FOP.. 'THE-. /~iC~HT. f e,o .ol, nlo'recy 1 ,0oo. Is any County Department involved in the project, event or program for which you are seeking funds? If this request for funding will not fully fund your activity or program, what other individuals or organizations will provide the remainder of the funding? 0407:23380.1 'tH;S d,,.op y Page 2 If applicant is an organization, answer the following: Is the organization a corporation? Is the organization non-profit? Is the organization tax-exempt? Yes v'/ No Yes V/' No Yes L./ No What is the address of the applicant making this funding request? What is the telephone number, fax number, e-mail address of the applicant? Signature of applicant. If you are signing on behalf of an organization you must be the president, vice-president, chairman or vice- chairman of the organization. Signature Title (if signing on behalf of an organization) Printed Name 0407:23380.1 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 1 of 1 AGENDA Meeting Date: March 10, 1999 Item Number: 8.C.~L9. Subject: Transfer $4,000 from the Clover Hill District Three-Cent Road Fund to the Parks and Recreation Department to Purchase Playground Equipment for Providence Elementary School County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: The Board is requested to transfer $4,000 from the Clover Hill District Three-Cent Road Fund to Parks and Recreation to purchase playground equipment for Providence Elementary School. Summary_ of Information: Mr. Warren is requesting that the Board transfer $4,000 from the Clover Hill District Three- Cent Road Fund to the Parks and Recreation Department to purchase playground equipment for Providence Elementary School. This request originally came from the Providence Elementary PTA. The County is legally prohibited from giving money to a PTA organization but it can use public funds to improve County property. It is legally appropriate to use public funds to improve Providence Elementary School property which is owned by the County. The balance in the Clover Hill District Three-Cent Road Fund account is $41,047; use of $4,000 will leave an available balance of $37,047 Rebecca T. Dickson Attachments: [] Yes I~ No Title: Director, Budget and Management 0414:43893.1 I# 'THREE CENT ROAD FUND This application must be completed and signed before the County can consider s request for funding w~"th Three Cent Road Funds, Completing end signing this form doss not mean thst you will receive funding or that the County ;sn legslly Gonsider your raquest. Virginia Ilw plaoss substantial rsstrictlons on the authority of the County to give public funds, sUGh as Three Cent Road Funds, to private persons or organizations and these resU'icflon8 may preclude the County's Board of Supervisors from even considering your request, What is the name of the applicant (person or organizatiOn) making this fun(ling request? if an organization is the applicant, what the nature end purpose of the organization? (Also attach organization's most recent articles of incorporation and/or bylaws to application.) What is the amount of funding you are seeking? M~/-//( 04:20 ... Describe in detail the funding request and how the money, if approved, will bo spent, Se 16 any County Department involved in the projeot, event or program for whi;h you are seeking funds? If this request for fundlng will not fully fund your activity or program, what other individl~al$ or organizations will provide the remainder of the funding? Page 2 if applicant is an organization, answer the following: IS the organization a corporation? Is the organization non-profit? Is the organizatiOn tax-exempt? Yes No Yes~ No_ _ _ e e What is the address of the applicant making this funding request? What is the telephone number, fax number, e.mail address of the appllc, ant? Signature of applicant, if you are signing on behalf of an organization you must be the president, vice-president, chalrmln or vioe- chairman of the organization. Title (if signing on behalf of an otganlzation) Printed Na~e Mr. Art Warren Clover I-t~ll Represenlalive Board of Supervisors ChesT.erfield County February 25.1999 Dear Mr. Warren, Thank you tbr your response to my January 29, 1999 letter. The playground figures .are in, so I am finally ready to proceed with the process of getting it purchascd and installed. Enclosed is a copy of the playground proposal from MIRACLE. The total cost for the playground equipment is $15,300 and we feel the layout is an excellent selection of pieces for the money. The plastic timbers for the playground will cost $1.490. The wood timbers for the bus loop area and ground cover for both areas will cost $2,412 (these figures were provided by Mr. Sadler from Parks and Recreation). The total cost of the playground equipmen_t is $19,202.00. Currently we have $12,150 in money we have raised and donations. We anticipate making :$3.000 next month in our Silent Auction. If the county would provide us with the remaining $4.000. the Providence Elementary PTA could order and install the new playground equipment this spring. Please use your influence with the county and any help we can get in our efforts to fund the new equipment would be appreciated. If you need any additional information or have any questions. please do not hesitate to contact me. Thank you fbr your assistance and support of Chesterfield County's public schools. Sincerely. L. Brookmke ' Providence Elementary PTA 2305 Krossridge Ter. Richmond. VA 23236 804-276-1512 M~R-03-~999 11:42 ~04 674 5388 95X P.02 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 1 of 1 AGENDA Meeting Date: March 10, 1999 Item Number: F.8.C.20 Subject: Authorization for the County Administrator and the Chairman to approach the Postal Service to conform current zip codes to the boundaries of the County County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Authorize the County Administrator and the Chairman to explore opportunities to revise zip codes to conform to jurisdictional boundaries Summary. of Information: Members of the Board have expressed concern that the large number of Postal Service zip codes that service Chesterfield County and at the same time reference adjoining localities continue to cost the county because of misdirected tax payments. In addition, new citizens tend to be confused about their residence and proper place to vote because of the overlapping zip codes. '"'~even L. Micas 0800:44086.1 Attachments: U]Yes .No I# [ CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page _1 of _1 Meetin Date: March 10, 1999 Item Number: 10. A. Report On: Developer Water and Sewer Contracts Background: The Board of Supervisors has authorized the County Administrator to execute water and/or sewer contracts between the County and the Developer where there are no County funds involved. The report is submitted to the Board members as information. Summary of Information: The following water and sewer contract was executed by the County Administrator: Contract Number: Project Name: Developer: Contractor: Contract Amount: District: 98-0160 Rite Aid @ Courthouse and Route 360 A. H. Sigma Richmond L.L.C. Chesapeake Excavation and Utilities, Inc. Water Improvements - Wastewater Improvements - Prepared By: Matoaca ~Jr. $7,000.00 $3,000.00 County Administrator: Attachments: Yes No 190 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Meeting Date: March 10, 1999 Item Number: 10.B. Su~ect: Status of General Fund Balance, Reserve for Future Capital Projects, District Road and Street Light Funds, and Lease Purchases County Administ~tor's Commen~: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Summary of Information: Preparer: ~ '~ msey~ ' Lane B. I~a Attachments: Yes [-~No Title: County Administrator CHESTERFIELD COUNTY GENERAL FUND BALANCE March 4, 1999 BOARD MEETING DATE 07/01/98 10/28/98 10/28/98 10/28/98 10/28/98 11/12/98 DESCRIPTION FY99 Actual Beginning Fund Balance Designation of FY98 expenditure savings to address County Unified Pay Plan in future years Reappropriation of FY98 expenditure savings to the Fire Department ~'or u~e in FY99 Designate net school FY98 expenditure savings for school uses Reappropriation of FY98 County expenditure savings for Unified Pay Plan in FY99 AMOUNT (1,885,893) BALANCE $33,760,968 $31,875,075 (141,300) $31,733,775 (2,092,918) $29,640,857 (700,000) $28,940,857 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY RESERVE FOR FUTURE CAPITAL PROJECTS TRADITIONALLY FUNDED BY DEBT March 4, 1999 Board Meeting Date Description FOR FISCAL YEAR '99 BEGINNING JULY 1, 1998 Amount Balance 4/8/98 FY99 Budgeted Addition 8,150,000 8,411,790 4/8/98 FY99 Capital Projects (5,918,800) 2,492,990 6/24/98 Transfer for Clover Hill Sports Complex, Phase II acceleration of soccer fields, baseball fields, and parking (460,000) 2,032,990 7/29/98 File tracking system in Clerk of Circuit Court's office (50,000) 1,982,990 8/20/98 Designation for potential reduction in grant funds for the Henricus Land purchase (230,000) 1,752,990 10/14/98 Transfer for construction of Phase II of Public Safety Training Center at Enon (70,000) 1,682,990 10/28/98 Transfer funds for County match of DCJS grant for Criminal History Record System Improvement to provide video arraignment capabilities. (contingent upon grant approval) (74,977) 1,608,013 11/12/98 11/24/98 11/24/98 12/16/98 Transfer funds to the Chesterfield Historical Society for museum improvements for the County's 250th anniversary Transfer funds to County Capital Projects to fund construction of soccer field lighting at Manchester Middle School Transfer funds to cover costs of security system for Information Systems Technology. Designation for FY2000 road projects local match: (38,000) 1,570,013 (50,000) 1,520,013 (115,000) 1,405,013 Board Meeting Date 1/27/99 2/10/99 2/24/99 2/24/99 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY RESERVE FOR FUTURE CAPITAL PROJECTS TRADITIONALLY FUNDED BY DEBT March 4, 1999 Description Walton Park Sidewalk Point of Rocks Road Bike Trail, Phase I Centre Street Streetlight Cogbill Road Sidewalk Salem Church Read Sidewalk Designation for potential expenses related to the Year 2000 project Transfer funds to bury overhead utility lines along Jury Drive Transfer for Circuit/General District Courthouse space needs assessment Transfer for requirements analysis for the financial and human resources/payroll system Amount (52,800) (48,ooo) (8,000) (26,000) (15,200) (lSO, OOO) (loo,ooo) (75,000) (15o, ooo) Balance 1,255,013 1,105,013 1,005,013 930,013 780,013 Accounting Department February 28, 1999 SCHEDULE OF CAPITALIZED LEASE PURCHASES Date Original Began Description Amount 12f88 '12/93 09/96 APPROVED AND EXECUTED Airport State Poliee Hangar Additions $128,800 County Warehouse 331,200 Total 460,0O0 Real Property Lease/ Purchase School Technical Center Printing Press Date Ends 12/00 17,510,000 12/01 80,649 11/99 Outstanding Balance 02/28/99 $ 29,745 76,486 106,231 6,990,000 16,329 TOTAL APPROVED AND EXECUTED $18.050.64~9 $7,112:560 PENDING EXECUTION Building Construction, Expansion and Renovation - Certificates of Participation - $26.8 million Approved August 27, 1997 *Second Refunding of Certificates of Participation, Series 1985 196 ~leeting Date: March 10, 1999 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Item Number: 14. Page 1 of 1 Subject: Resolution to Recognize Philip Morris U.S.A. for Their $50,000.00 Grant to the Fire Department to Assist the Fire and Life Safety Training Trailer Project. County_ Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Adoption of attached resolution. Summary_ of Information: The Philip Moms U.S.A. Grant will assist the fire department in the purchase and operation of a Fire and Life Safety Tra/ning Trailer project. This trailer will be utilized by the Fire Department to teach practical fire and life safety training programs to school students. In addition, the trailer will be utilized at many special events in Chesterfield County throughout the year. This grant will provide $50,000.00 toward the project. Preparer: ~ A~)~, Stephen A. Elswick Yes ~ No Attachments: I I Title: Fire Chief BOARD RESOLUTION RECOGNIZING PHILIP MORRIS U.S.A. WHEREAS, THE LOSS OF LIFE AND PROPERTY DUE TO FIRE OCCURS PRIMARILY IN OUR HOMES; WHEREAS, THE MAJORITY OF HOME FIRES ARE PREVENTABLE; AND WHEREAS, THE GOAL OF FIRE AND LIFE SAFETY EDUCATION IS TO REDUCE LOSS OF LIFE, SERIOUS INJURIES, AND LOSS OF PROPERTY; AND WHEREAS, THE MOST IMPORTANT GOAL OF FIRE AND LIFE SAFETY EDUCATION IS TO CHANGE UNSAFE FIRE AND SAFETY BEHAVIORAL PRACTICES. THIS IS ACCOMPLISHED BY TEACHING CHILDREN AND ADULTS HOW TO IDENTIFY AND ELIMINATE POTENTIAL FIRE AND LIFE SAFETY HAZARDS, AND TEACH THEM TO ALWAYS FOLLOW PROPER SAFETY TECHNIQUES SUCH AS: THE IMPORTANCE OF PROPERLY OPERATING SMOKE DETECTORS, PRACTICING HOME ESCAPE PLANNING, FOLLOWING SAFE COOKING PRACTICES, THE PROPER USE OF 9-1-1, AND THE IMPORTANCE OF PROPERLY DISPLAYED HOUSE NUMBERS; AND WHEREAS, THE RESPONSIBILITY OF PROTECTING AND EDUCATING CHESTERFIELD COUNTY CITIZENS LIES WITHIN THE HEART OF OUR COMMUNITY; AND WHEREAS, OUT OF THIS SPIRIT OF COMMUNITY, THE CHESTERFIELD FIRE DEPARTMENT AND PHILIP MORRIS USA HAVE FORMED A LIFE SAVING PARTNERSHIP TO ASSIST IN PURCHASING A FIRE AND LIFE SAFETY TRAINING TRAILER TO ALLOW THE CHILDREN OF OUR COUNTY TO PARTICIPATE IN PRACTICAL LIFE SAFETY TRAINING; AND WHEREAS, PHILIP MORRIS USA HAS DESIGNATED CHESTERFIELD COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENT AS THE RECIPIENT OF A $50,000.00 GRANT TO HELP PURCHASE AND OPERATE A FIRE AND LIFE SAFETY TRAINING TRAILER. THIS VALUABLE TEACHING TOOL WILL BE UTILIZED 1N ALL CHESTERFIELD COUNTY ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS, AND ALSO MANY COMMUNITY EVENTS THROUGHOUT CHESTERFIELD COUNTY, WHICH WILL GIVE THE FIRE DEPARTMENT THE OPPORTUNITY TO REACH 50,000 CHILDREN; AND NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, THAT THE CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS PUBLICLY RECOGNIZES PHILIP MORRIS USA FOR THEIR GENEROUS CONTRIBUTION TO THE CHESTERFIELD COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENT, AND ACKNOWLEDGES THEIR COMMUNITY SUPPORT IN HELPING CHESTERFIELD REACH THEIR GOAL OF BEING THE SAFEST AND MOST SECURE COMMUNITY OF ITS SIZE IN THE U.S.A.. 199 Meeting Date: CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA March 10, 1999 Page 1 Item Number: of 1 15. Subject: Hearing of' Citizen on Unscheduled Matters County_ Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Summary. of Information: Mr. David R. Cosby has requested the opportunity to address the Board regarding the business plan of First Tee. (See attached letter.) The lease between the County and First Tee provides that Richmond First Tee must submit a business plan to the County. (See attached '[1 12.) Once a lease is approved by the Board, normally the administration of leases is handled by the County Administrator. Lade B. Ramsey Attachments: · Yes [] No Title: County Administrator 0800:43863.2 DddC0s 5821 Kingsl~md Road Richmond, V~. 23237 4 Tuesday, Feb ) 999 Janice Blaldey Deputy Clerk To The Board Of Supervisors County of Chesterfield P. O. BOx 40 Chesterfield, Va. 23832 Dear Ms. Blakley By this letter I hereby request to be allowed to speak before the Board of Supervisors at their next scheduled meeting. The topic that I wish to speak on is the business plan of The Richmond First Tee for the proposed Iron Bridge Park golf come. Due to my work Schedule I request that I be allowed to address the Board after 7:00 PM. I am looking forward to hearing from you in the near filture. David Cosby 743-0754 201 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Meeting Date: March 10, 1999 Item Number: 16.A. Subject: PUBLIC HEARING: Ordinance to Vacate Portions of a 16' Utility Easement Across Lot 7, Block D, Chatham, Section B County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors adopt an ordinance to vacate portions of a 16' utility easement across Lot 7, Block D within Chatham, Section B, shown on the attached plat. Summary of Information: Paul R. Hetterich and Elizabeth A. Hetterich have submitted an application requesting the vacation of portions of a 16' utility easement across Lot 7, Block D, Chatham, Section B. This request has been reviewed by staff and approval is recommended. District: Midlothian Jo~n W. Harmon Attachments: YesI Title: Right of Way Manaqer VICINITY SKETCH ~, PH: OKE'INANCE TO VACATE PC,K~IONS OF A 16' UEILITY EASEMENT ACRC~S LOT 7 BLOCK D CHATHAM SECTION E PAUL R EF~TERICH & E[IZABE~'5 A HS~TERICH r. UG- ' ILL :- -- ~'~. ~ ~ ~ . · ~.- ~- ~ ;~ ' MOBILE HOME' / · " _WLLAGE ~ / ~ ~ >~ Arc il age > . ~ 8 ~ 0 For i...04 r eo-~.t-M~ kJ~;.~t~ ~outt~ t~y Homes P.OI HELEN P* ~ARLICK GPIN:?54-?I2-8955 08.2574 PG 112 8 NOTI~: tuPROVE~NTS NOT SHOiJN COMMON~tALTH OF VIRGINIA CREEK lO0' DRMNAOE EASEUENT Pi). )4 PG,63 PAUL R, HETIERICH ELIZABETH A. HETTERICH DB.)g46 PO,lO40 7 ACRES./- lO0 REAR .2]T.5 ...... No.I~40 ~INSLOW ROAD 105.00' S II'O0'QO'E V I RG I N I Aw~NsL°w SURVEYS JEFFREY K. FLOYD CERTIFIED BY 001905 VIRGINIA CERTIFICATE NO, I No.1350 WtNSLOW ROAD GALE C. COLE V,C,TOUBERLIN gPIN:?S4-?I2-82B4 gB.1968 PG.I§91 6 LIUITS OF lO0 YEAR FLOOD PLAIN AS SHOWN ON SUBDiVISIQN PLAT N0 t400 NINSLOW ROAD 410.05' TO THE N/LINE OF TRENT ROAD EXT'D. ROAD VIRGINIA SURVEYS P,O BOX 118 CHESTERFIELD VA. 23832 (804) 748-g481 JOBNO. 99024368 $CALE 2-23-99 DATE ,~05 P. 0. Box 85333 An Affiliate of Media General Richmond, Virginia 23293-0001 (804) 649-6000 Advertising Affidavit (This is not a bill, please pay from invoice) CHESTERFILD CO RIGHT WAY RIGHT OF WAY DEPT IAccount Num.I 220686 Date 03/03/99 CHESTERFIELD, VA. 23832 Date Code Description Ad Size Total Cost 03/03/99 121 TAKE NOTICE: THAT ON MARCH 10, 1999, AT 1 x 27 248.94 That on March 10, 1999, at 7:00 p.m. or as soo~ thereafter as ma~ be he~rd, the Board of $upervi. regumr meeting place m me Bom. d Room of Ches~erf~d C,m.,nt~, Vir- gin.'.~, will .consider the following oroJ~Fice Tot adoption: AN O.RDINANCE to vscate a por- tion m s 16' utility easement with- B, Lot 7, as shown on a i~at by J.K. T~mmons, dated March 30, 1965, recorded April 21 1965 i~ the Clerk s Office, Circuit Court, C~estedieid County, Virgima, n Deed Book 14 at Page 63. Thg.. compmm text of the proposed o~ainance and co'm,ayance is o~ !Jle i~ ..U'm office pf the Right of way Manage~ ~ Chesterfield County, Virginm, ~ may be! examined by aJI interested partiesi between the r,)urs of 8:30 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. Monday through Erid_~. HERE Richmond Newspapers, Inc. Publisher of THE RICHMOND TIMES-DISPATCH This is to certify that the attached MEETINGS - COMING EVENTS was published by Richmond Newspapers, Inc., in the City of Richmond, State of Virginia, on the following dates: 02/24/99 03/03/99 RECEIVED 0 8 1999 The first insertion being given .... 02/24/99 UTILITIES DEPT R/W SEC? Sworn to and subscribed before me this Virginia City of Richmond My Commission expires 03/31/01 - Superviso.?J - THIS IS NOT A BILL, PLEASE PAY FROM INVOICE. THANK YOU CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Meeting Date: Match 10, 1999 Item Number: 16. B. Subject: PUBLIC HEARING: To Consider the Conveyance of Right of Way and Easements for the Walmsley Boulevard Road Improvement Project County_ Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Staff requests that the Board of Supervisors approve the conveyance of right of way and easements to the Commonwealth of Virginia and utility easements to Virginia Electric and Power Company and Bell Atlantic-Virginia, Inc. and authorize the County Administrator and Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to execute the deed and easement agreements. Summary_ of Information: The Virginia Department of Transportation has requested the donation of right of way and easements for the Walmsley Boulevard Road Improvement Project. Staff has requested that VDOT reimburse the County the cost to advertise the public hearing; to provide temporary security fencing during construction; and, to reinstall the permanent fence upon completion. This request has been reviewed by staff and approval is recommended. District: Clover Hill Preparer: ~~ -z.].~~.~ John W. Harmon Attackments: ~Yes NO Title: Riqht of Way Manager P. O. Box 85333 An Affiliate of Media General Richmond, Virginia 23293-0001 (804) 649-6000 Advertising Affidavit (This is not a bill, please pay from invoice) CHESTERFILD CO RIGHT WAY RIGHT OF WAY DEPT Account NumI 220686 Date 03/03/99 CHESTERFIELD, VA. 23832 Date Code Description Ad Size Total Cost 03/03/99 121 TAKE NOTICE: THAT ON MARCH 10, 1999, AT 1 x 20 92.20 ~ NOTICE That o~ March 10, 1~, at 7:00 be heard, the Board of Supervi- sors of Che~tedleld Couot~ at ils I r~]ulm' meetin~ p~ace in the Board Pzfom of Che~erfield Co~ty, Vlr- or r~nt o~ way a~d eesemants to tbe Wrg~a D~o~nmeot of Tram-, portation for Im~rovemants to Information regarding this of the Ri~ of Way Manager in partiea between the hours of 8:30 la~m. and. 5:00 p.m., HERE Richmond Newspapers, Inc. Publisher of THE RICHMOND TIMES-DISPATCH This is to certify that the attached MEETINGS - COMING EVENTS was published by Richmond Newspapers, Inc., in the City of Richmond, State of Virginia, on the following dates: 03/03/99 The first insertion being given .... Sworn to and subscribed before me this ~.t.\ I~,,.ll . Notary' Public ~a~e~ ow v~r~n~a City of Richmond My Commission expires 03/31/01 03/03/99 RECEIVED C"~--~ - ,-~,-: !;-!'~q 0 8 1999 UTILITIES DEP% R/W SECT. THIS IS NOT A BILL, PLEASE PAY FROM INVOICE. THANK YOU CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Meeting Date: Subject: March 10, 1999 Item Number: 16.C. PUBLIC HEARING: To Consider the Conveyance of a 6.2 Acre Parcel of Land to Miles and Wells County_ Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: ~ Board Action Requested: Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors authorize the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors and the County Administrator to execute a quitclaim deed to convey a 6.2 acre parcel of land to Miles and Wells. Summary of Information: Miles and Wells, a Virginia general partnership has requested the quitclaim of a 6.2 acre parcel of land acquired for the Hopkins Road Extension. A relocated parcel of land has been dedicated to replace this right of way. Staff has reviewed the request and recommends approval. District: Bermuda J~hn W. Harmon Attachments: Yes No Title: Riqht of Way Manaqer PUBLIC HEARING: VICINITt SEE~CH TO CONSIDER %B5 CONVEYANCE CF A 6.2 ACRE PARCEL CF LANE, TO MILES ~NE WELLS ,ANO~G PL ~' ' ' ~ HOIJ.¥ ZOS · ~. / \ ~-ATE: 12-16-97 ,J~ No.: RC48003gOq , \ \ \ \ MATCH LINE - SEE SHEET 2 ,/ · O~A/OO~Fg~q~/lq~e ~U/T~'220e /~~ 2323~J Z tiN[ - SEE SHEET ! Z ./ ~'~A~: 12-- 16--97 ~'~ scA~: ,-_ 200. _~ ~~ JOe NO.: RC48903802~ P. O. Box 85333 An Affiliate of Media General Richmond, Virginia 23293-0001 (804) 649-6000 Advertising Affidavit (This is not a bill, please pay from invoice) CHESTERFILD CO RIGHT WAY RIGHT OF WAY DEPT Account Num.] 220686 [ DateI 03/03/99 CHESTERFIELD, VA. 23832 Date Code ' :. Ad Size Total Cost 03/03/99 121 TAKE NOTICE: THAT ON MARCH 10, 1999, AT 1 x 24 110.64 TAKE NOTICE: T/lat on Maroh 10, 1999, ~t 7.00 p.m. or a~ soon tberedtef as may t~e heard~ the Board of Superv~ sors,of Ches~rfietd County at its ~ of Chesfedie~cl Co~ty. Vir- ginia, will consider the cqnve~ t of a 6.2 acre parcel of iand as DeBell, Elkin & Titus, Ltd,, dated November 1 1990, recorded Janu- a_~ 30, 1991 in the Cle~k's Office. Circuit Co~rt, Chestedieid County, Virginia, in De~ I~ 2134 at Page 440. ' Th~ complete text of the proposed ~ is o~ lite i~ tbe office of the Right of Way Manager in _~C~s, terfiald ~,ou~'~ty, Virginia, and may ~e examined by ~ ~nterested parties between the hours of. 8:30 &n~ and 5:00 p.m.. Monday th...~r~h Friday HERE Richmond Newspapers, Inc. Publisher of THE RICHMOND TIMES-DISPATCH This is to certify that the attached MEETINGS - COMING was published by Richmond Newspapers, Inc., in the City of Richmond, State of Virginia, on the following dates: 03/03/99 EVENTS The first insertion being given .... Sworn to and subscribed before me this ~,- ur ~c~c:i _. ! t.J, ,~ . . Notary Public b~ate 'Of wrg,n,a City of Richmond My Commission expires 03/31/01 03/03/99 UTiLiTiES DEP!. RAN SECT Supervisor~J THIS IS NOT A BILL, PLEASE PAY FROM INVOICE. THANK YOU CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 o fl MeetingDate: March 10, 1999 Item Number: Subject: PUBLIC HEARING: To consider the Abandonment of Fitzhugh Street, State Route 1312 16.D. a Portion of County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Staff requests that the Board of Supervisors adopt the attached resolution to abandon a portion of Fitzhugh Street, State Route 1312. Summary of Information: On January 27, 1999, the Board authorized the posting and publishing of notices to abandon a portion of Fitzhugh Street, State Route 1312, as shown on the attached sketch. This abandonment is for the Matoaca Supermarket Development. This request has been reviewed by County staff and the Virginia Department of Transportation and approval is recommended. District: Matoaca · Harmon Attach_merits: Yes No Title: Right of Way Manager CHESTERFIELD COUNTY: At a regular meeting of the Board of Supervisors held at the Courthouse on March 10, 1999 at 7:00 p,mo Resolution and Order WHEREAS, the Virginia Department of Transportation has submitted a sketch to the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County depicting a portion of Fitzhugh Street, State Route 1312, to be abandoned from the secondary system of state highways; and WHEREAS, pursuant to a resolution of this Board, January 27, 1999, the required notices of the County's intention to abandon a portion of Fitzhugh Street, State Route 1312, have been given in that: on January 29, 1999, a notice was posted in at least three places along Fitzhugh Street, State Route 1312; and on February 24, 1999, and March 3, 1999, a notice was published in the Richmond Times Dispatch having general circulation within the County announcing this Public Hearing to receive comments concerning the proposed abandonment; and on February 2, 1999, notice was sent to the Commissioner of the Virginia Department of Transportation; and WHEREAS, after considering all evidence available, this Board is satisfied that no public necessity exists for the continuance of the section of Fitzhugh Street, State Route 1312, extending from its intersection with Pickett Avenue, State Route 600 a distance of 0.03 miles, and hereby deems that section of road is no longer necessary as a part of the Secondary System of State Highways. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors hereby abandons the above described section of Fitzhugh Street, State Route 1312 and removes it from the secondary system of state highways, pursuant to Section 33.1-151, Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended. AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that a certified copy of this resolution be forwarded to the Resident Engineer for the Virginia Department of Transportation. AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors does hereby request that the Commissioner of the Virginia Department of Transportation certify, in writing, that the portion of Fitzhugh Street hereby abandoned is no longer deemed necessary for uses of the secondary system of State highways pursuant to Section 33.1-154 of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended. Certified By: Lisa Elko, Acting Clerk to the Board of Supervisors l :~CSA\WP~eaolufionWITZHU GH 11'-~-', , An Affiliate of Mecli~ General Richmond, Virginia 232@3-000 (804) 649-6000 Advertising Affidavit (This is not a bill, please pay from invoice) CHESTERFILD CO RIGHT WAY RIGHT OF WAY DEPT 220686 Date 03/03/99 CHESTERFIELD, VA. 23832 Date Code ~ Description ' :' :Ad Size Total Cost 03/03/99 121 TAKE NOTICE: THAT PURSUANT TO SECTION 33 1 x 22 202.84 TAKE NOTICE: That m~mJmt to Sectkm 33.1-151 of ~11e Cede of ~g~J~ a notice that at a re~a~ mee{ing to ROOm On MARCH 10, 1999~ at 7:00 p.m. it wilt co,skier · resolu- tion and o~ to abandon a por- ~tkm d F~'~gh Street, ~ Route 1312, as shown ~n a ske Iwhich ts attac~ed to this ~ reso~tk:m: [ The comp~ text of the pro!~ : orde~ ts o~ file tn l~e office of the ,, Right of Way Mmqager m .Chest?' fle~d C,o~mty, Virginia, a~m may examined by all intefeated pan~ be~mer~ the hours of 8:30 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., M(mday through Friday. HERE Richmond Newspapers, Inc. Publisher of THE RICHMOND TIMES-DISPATCH This is to certify that the attached MEETINGS - COMING EVENTS was published by Richmond Newspapers, Inc., in the City of Richmond, State of Virginia, on the following dates: 02/24/99 03/03/99 The first insertion being given .... Sworn to and subscribed before me this o~._q, qR' 'S;at~ otL)vir~ia ' ' City of Richmond My Commission expires 03/31/01 RECEIVED C: .,r_ STER,-"-' ~' '*'~' O 8 19c)9 02/24/99 UTILITIES DEPT. R~;,/SECT Supervise'U THIS IS NOT A BILL, PLEASE PAY FROM INVOICE. THANK YOU CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1. of 1 Meeting Date: March 10, 1999 Item Number: 16.E. Subject: Public Hearing to Consider an Ordinance Amending the County Code by Updating References tc State Law to Reflect the Recodification of Title 15.2 of the Virginia Code and the Consolidation of the Uniform Statewide Building Code County_ Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: {~ Board Action Requested: Summary. of Information: Last year, the General Assembly recodified Title 15.1 of the State Code which affects localities, into a new Title 15.2. There are several references to former Title 15.1 in the County Code which need to be converted to 15.2 references. Additionally, the Uniform Statewide Building Code, which was previously contained in two volumes, has been consolidated into a single volume. County Code references to the two volumes of the Uniform Statewide Building Code also need to be updated to reflect this consolidation. The attached ordinance updates these state law references in all chapters of the County Code except for the subdivision ordinance and zoning ordinance. Updates to the subdivision and zoning ordinance have been referred to the Planning Commission for a recommendation in accordance with state law. None of the proposed changes would substantively change the County Code in any way. Steven L. Micas 0505(00):43673.2(43589.1) Attachments: I Yes [] No I # AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE CODE OF THE COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD, 1997, AS AMENDED, BY AMENDING SECTIONS 2-12, 2-31, 5-1, 5-2, 5-3, 5-5, 5-8, 5-10, 9-57, 10-21, 11-76, 16-31, and 18-67 TO UPDATE REFERENCES IN THOSE SECTIONS TO TITLE 15.1 OF THE VIRGINIA CODE AND TO THE UNIFORM STATEWIDE BUILDING CODE BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County: (1) That Sections 2-12 2-31, 5-1, 5-2, 5-3, 5-5, 5-8, 5-10, 9-57, 10-21, 11-76, 16-31, and 18-67 oft he Code of the Count. q£ Chesterfield, 1997, as amended, are amended and reenacted to read as follows: Sec. 2-12. Compensation for members of advisory boards. The board of supervisors may provide that members of designated advisory boards, committees, authorities and commissions, created by the board pursuant to Code of Virginia, § 15.1-33.2 15,2-1411 shall (i) be reimbursed the actual expenses incurred by them while serving on such advisory boards, committees, authorities and commissions, and (ii) be compensated for their services at a rate not to exceed $50.00 for attendance per meeting and not to exceed a total of $3,000.00 per calendar year, unless otherwise permitted by law. 000 Sec. 2-31. Created. There is hereby created a political subdivision of the state with the public and corporate powers stated in the Industrial Development and Revenue Bond Act (Code of Virginia, tit. 15. I, c|i. 3-3 15,2, ch,49 [§ 15.1-1373 15,2-4900 et seq.]), including such powers as may hereat~er be stated in such act. 000 Sec. 5-1. Applicability of Virginia Uniform Statewide Building Code, Voluine I and Volume H. The Virginia Uniform Statewide Building Code, Volain¢ I,,,,,~-~- J ','-',,,,,., ...... II, shall apply to all buildings and structures which are constructed, altered, repaired or converted in use and to all equipment associated with such buildings and structures. Sec. 5-2. Local building department. The county shall at all times maintain a local building department. The local building department shall 0505:43589.1 1 administer, supervise and enforce the Virginia Uniform Statewide Building Coder-V~Mm~, ....... ,j_.. ,~:.__ ,~_~_ ,t_, ...... ,-~ ........... ,_-, .......... , ..... :,J,------: ........... '-'-J- Thelocal · building department shall have an executive official in charge, who shall be referred to as the building official. The building official shall supervise all employees of the department and may delegate his duties to appropriate qualified employees of the department. The building official and all other employees of the local building department who administer, supervise and enforce the Virginia Uniform Statewide Building Code, ·It'-'o,~,.~ ...... I ~.u-~- j ·It'-',.,,~,,.~ ...... ", shall be certified in accordance with the Virginia Certification Standards. Sec. 5-3. Other rules and regulations. Subject to the approval of the board of supervisors, the building official may promulgate other rules and regulations which are necessary to administer and enforce the Virginia Uniform Statewide B ildi g Code u n , It ~JIL~III~ 000 Sec. 5-5. Permit fees. (a) Generally. Except as provided in this section, every applicant for a building permit must pay the fees set forth in this section before the building official issues a building permit that is required by the Virginia Uniform Statewide Building Coder-Vvtnm~. If an applicant must pay an additional fee because of an increase in the estimated cost of work, the building official shall not issue an amended permit for the additional work until the applicant has paid the additional fee. OOO (d) Fee exemptions. (1) Applicants for building permits shall not be required to pay fees if the estimated cost of construction is less than $500.00 and construction does not require any other permit under the Virginia Uniform Statewide Building CodeT-Votum~. 000 Sec. 5-8. Board of building code appeals. (a) The county shall at all times maintain a board of building code appeals, which shall consist of 13 members, at least four of whom shall be tradesmen, as that term is defined in Code of Virginia, § 54.1-1128. The board of building code appeals shall hear appeals of decisions of the building official in accordance with Code of Virginia, § 36-105, and the Virginia Uniform Statewide ildi gC d ·'-' ......... ~·'-' ....... ~ 0505:43589.1 2 000 Sec. 5-10. Violations and penalties. No owner or any other person, firm or corporation shall violate any provision of the Virginia Uniform Statewide Building Code, Voluni¢ I or Volarn¢ II. Any violation shall be a misdemeanor and any owner or any other person, firm or corporation convicted of such a violation shall be punished by a fine of not more than $2,500.00. If the violation concerns a residential unit and if the violation remains uncorrected at the time of the conviction, the court shall order the violator to abate or remedy the violation. Except as otherwise provided by the court for good cause shown, any such violator shall abate or remedy the violation within six months of the date of conviction. Any person convicted of a second offense committed within less than five years after a first offense under this chapter shall be punished by a fine of not less than $1,000.00 nor more than $2,500.00. Any person convicted of a second offense committed within a period of five to ten years after a first offense under this chapter shall be punished by a fine of not less than $500.00 nor more than $2,500.00. Any person convicted of a third or subsequent offense committed within ten years after an offense under this chapter shall be punished by a fine of not less than $1,500.00 nor more than $2,500.00. Notwithstanding the foregoing, those provisions requiring a minimum fine shall apply only to convictions for building code violations which cause a building or structure to be unsafe or unfit for human habitation. OOO Sec. 9-57. Motor vehicles owned by members of volunteer rescue squads, members of volunteer fire departments and auxiliary police officers. (a) Motor vehicles (i) owned by members or auxiliary members of a volunteer rescue squad or volunteer fire department or persons appointed to serve as auxiliary police officers pursuant to Code of Virginia, § 15.1-159.2 15,2-1731 or (ii) leased by members or auxiliary members ora volunteer rescue squad or volunteer fire department if the member is obligated by the terms of the lease to pay tangible personal property tax or the motor vehicle hereby constitute a separate classification for tangible personal property taxation, subject to the standards, conditions and requirements provided in this section. 000 (c) To qualify for separate classification under this section, the motor vehicle must: (1) Be owned or leased by a member or auxiliary member of a volunteer rescue squad or volunteer fire department or owned by a person appointed to serve as an auxiliary police officer pursuant to Code of Virginia, § 15.1-159.2 15,2-1731; 000 0505:43589.1 3 (d) Any member or auxiliary member of a volunteer rescue squad or volunteer fire department or person appointed to serve as an auxiliary police officer pursuant to Code of Virginia, § 15.1-159.2 15.2-1731, who seeks to have a motor vehicle separately classified for a tax year under this section must, prior to January 31 of the tax year, furnish the commissioner of the revenue with a certification, signed under oath by the fire chief or head of the member's volunteer organization or department stating that: 000 Sec. 10-21. Required. Pursuant to the authority set forth in Code of Virginia, § 15.1-29.9 15,2-922, smoke detectors shall be installed in (i) buildings containing one or more dwelling units which are rented or leased; (ii) hotel or motel rooms and (iii) rooming houses used to provide overnight sleeping accommodations. 000 Sec. 11-76. Procedure for siting approval. (a) No later than 120 days after the county receives a completed application, as provided in section 11-73, the board of supervisors shall hold a public hearing concerning the approval or disapproval of the siting of the proposed solid waste management facility. Notice of the public hearing shall be provided in accordance with Code of Virginia, § 15.1-431 15,2-2204. 000 Sec. 16-31. Application; fees. (a) Each application to vacate a street, alley, road, easement, public way, plat or portion thereof pursuant to Code of Virginia, § 15.1-481 or 15.1-482 15,2-2271 or 15.2-2272, shall be submitted to the right-of-way office for administrative review prior to submission to the board of supervisors. Such application shall be made on forms provided by the right-of-way office. 000 Sec. 18-67. Creating tax assessment and development utility districts. The board of supervisors may wholly or partially pay for the cost of extending the utility system by creating a tax assessment district pursuant to Code of Virginia, § 15.1-239 15,2-2404 et seq., or a development district pursuant to Code of Virginia, § 15.1-466(A)(I0) 15,2-2243. Any such district that the board creates shall be created by an ordinance that shall not be set out in this Code but that shall be kept on file in the office of the director. 0505:43589.1 4 000 That this ordinance shall become effective immediately upon adoption. 0505:43589.1 ~ P.O. Box 85333 An Affiliate of Media General Richmond, Virginia 23293-0001 (804) 649-6000 Advertising Affidavit (This is not a bill, please pay from invoice) CHESTERFIELD CO.BO.SUPV ATTN FAITH DAVIS BOARD OFSUPERVISORS P 0 BOX 40 CHESTERFIELD VA 23832 220806 o3/o3/99 03/03/99 121 TAKE NOTICE TAKE NOTICE THAT THE BOARD O 1 x 28 258.16 Richmond Newspapers, Inc. Publisher of THE RICHMOND TIMES-DISPATCH This is to certify that the attached MEETINGS - COMING EVENTS was published by Richmond Newspapers, Inc.. in the City of Richmond, State of Virginia, on the following dateS: 02/24/99 03/03/99 HERE The first insertion being given Sworn to and subscribed before me this St~i/~ia Notary Public City of Richmond My Commission expires 03~31/01 02/24/99 Supervis~/ THIS IS NOT A BILL, PLEASE PAY FROM INVOICE. THANK YOU CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Meeting Date: March 10, 1999 Item Number: Su~ect: Adjournment and Notice of Next Scheduled Meeting of the Board of Supervisors County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Summary of Information: Motion of adjournment and notice of next scheduled meeting on March 1999 at ~?r5 p.m. Prepar~~,--~ ~-~-~ Li$~ H. Elko Attach m e nts: Yes No Title: Acting Clerk to the Board