03-11-1992 Packet
~
... ~-'~ .
~ ,
I .
~
I .
I
1
C'1 I
v
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOA~D OF SUPERVISORS
AG E NDA
MEET ING DATE :
March 11, 1992
ITEM NUMBER ~
2.
SUBJECT:
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS
COUNTY ADMINISTRATORt S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
See attachments.
PREPARED BY:
ATTACHMENTS: YES D NO D
78~
SIGNATU~
OUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
00 001
"t;
t
COMAJNWEALTH of VIR~IA
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT
P. O. Box 100
Chesterfield, Virginia 23832
MEMORADUM
TO: Lane B. Ramsey, County Administrator
FROM: William R. Nelson, M.D., Director~
DATE: February 12, 19~2
SUBJECT: Chesapeake Bay Local Assistance Board'
An exciting development has spun off from the septic system
maintenance ordinance. ~e ~he~~peake Ray Local Assistance Board
has select~d Chesterfield I s septic PUIDPout and mailltenance software
.~or a~~i~ition and distribution throughout Virqinia._ The County
has sold the software to the Assistance Board for" $8,000, who will
in turn, market the product to future users.
This program was develop itten by the microcomputer support
staff of 1ST ea ed b Mr. Kim DorWln. The principal programmer
involved was Mr. Joe Kennedy.
This means that Joe's handiwork, as a product of the County, will
be placed in every locality in the Commonwealth. ".Moreover, Joe has
been incredibly helpful in getting the system up and running
smoothly. I view this as a significant event and have enclosed a
draft letter of appreciatio~ for Joe for your consideration.
WRN/ajc
Enclosure
00 002
,. -
e
e
/
/
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BUDGET PRESENTATION
MARCH n 1992
. .
Members of the Board of Supervisors, it is a J'leasure for me to
stand before you ~oday and with staff present issues contained in the
County Administrator's recoll1nlended budget for 1992-93. Staff has
worked long and hard to introduce this budget to you.
This 1992-93 budget has been a :most difficult task. Last year, we
projected a slow 1991-92 year hoping that the recession would end soon
and that our revenue projections would be understated. The recession
didn't turn around and our projections have been on the mark. Again,
this year we have lllade what we believe are conservative projections in
a flattened econOlllY. The result of all this is that a county which is used
to 80/0 to 120/0 growth in revenue each year is facing two consecutive years
with little or no growth in revenue.
I'd like to highlight severallllajor points related to the budget and
then I'll ask Jay Stegm.aier to review additionallIlaterial with you.
1
"e
e
1. School Funding: The budget approved this past weekend by
the General Assem.bly will give the Chesterfield County
Public Schools $10,271,100 in new State and Federal funding
, ,.
for next year including $319,000 more than approved by the
School.Board on February 18. In addition to this increase,
the state has increased Chesterfield's allocation of state sales
tax by $282,500. While the county funding for schools was
not inc~eased except for debt service, the education budget
will receive a substantial increase with the state restoring
funds that were cut last year.
2.
Tax Rates:
The proposed 1992-93 budget does not
reCOIIllllend a tax rate increase. Assessments, however, will
be adj~sted to reflect lllarket conditions (inflation) which is
estiOlated to be about 1 0/0.
3. Capital Reserve: In 1989, the county began reserving funds
to pay for SOIne capital facilities on a pay-as..we-go basis. A
total of $11,601,400 has been set aside for facilities which
would otherwise have been paid for with bond funding.
2
:e
e
Today, - there is an uncolllnlitted balance in that reserve of
$5,350,900 and the proposed budget recommends adding
$2,600,000 to that reserve.
4. Nursing HODle: We are recommending to the Board of
Supervjsors that the Lucy Carr Nursing Hom.e be placed
under the supervision of a Health Center Conunission. The
Cornm.ission rnem.bers would be responsible for the operation
of the nursing hom.e, would be appointed by the Board of
Supervisors and would serve at the pleasure of the Board.
Advantages of doing this include: 1. More flexibility to
adjust costs to be :more in line with private nursing hom.es.
2. Flexibility to enter into agreements with llledical
universities to make the nursing home a teaching facility. 3.
The cur.rent subsidy can be elilllinated. The highest priority
in making such as change is that service to the patients will
not be-".~ dim.inished and if anything, im.proved and that
e:mployees will not suffer any losses.
5. Fees: -This budget recolIllllends adjustlllents of SOIne user
3
e
e
fees arid the establishlllent of som.e first tim.e fees. The
adjust:ments of fees are intended to :maintain a policy of lIuser
payll and to m.aintain the sallie revenue/cost ratio as in the
- "
past. Som.e new fees are recoInlllended, m.ost notably the
$3.00 fee in Parks and Recreation.
6. Building Inspection: This budget reconunends several
changes in the Building Inspection Office. Building related
fees are recom.:mended to increase and would be used to
provide "more training for building inspectors; staffing will be
adjusted to provide lIlore tillle on the job site to improve the
quality of inspections, and additional inspections will be
added to critical elelllents of home construction to give greater
assurance that code provisions have been lllet. This change
along '-with those already ilIlplem.ented should give
Chesterfield one of the most com.prehensive inspection
progra~s in Virginia.
7.
EconOlDic Developntent:
EconOlllic developIIlent is
extrexnely important to the future of the county. This budget
4
.e
It
reCOIlllllends two changes which will :make the county lIlore
com.petitive. 1. We're recom.lnending a change in the
Wholesale Business License tax to reduce the rate for those
, l'
businesses exceeding $55,000,000 in annual volulIle. 2. This
budget recom.m.ends the establish:ment of a closing account
which can be used in a case when a prospect will clearly be
lost without SOllle additional incentive.
These changes coupled with the current incentive progra:ms
(utilities and industrial access road) and an extrem.ely
cOlllpetitive Machinery and Tools tax rate will allow the
Econom~c Development Department to attract businesses to
Chesterfield who would otherwise locate elsewhere.
8. Salary AdjustDlent: Our most valuable resources in
government are the elllployees on the front lines delivering
services to county citizens. With no increase in funding, our
departnlent directors, constitutional officers, and elIlployees
have cOnllllitted to m.ake an already efficient governm.ent
m.ore ~fficient and will absorb the cost of a 50/0 salary
adjustment. The salary increase, if approved in the budget,
5
..e
e
will be given only upon a COlIlpetent perforlllance rating and
on the employees' anniversary date.
,.
In closing IllY portion of the presentation, I would like to cOOlm.end
the Board of Supervisor m.enlbers for the tim.e you've invested in the
budget process. I'd like to thank especially the Budget and Audit
COIIllIlittee (Mr. Daniel and Mr. McHale) for the guidance you've
provided.
I'd also espe.cially cornm.end the department directors and the
constitutional officers for the difficult COllllllitlllents made during the
budget process. These commitments were necessary in order to make
this budget work within fewer dollars in m.ost cases, and not seriously
reduce service levels.
I will now t~n over the presentation to Mr. Stegm.aier who will
give you more in -depth m.atters related to the proposed budget.
6
808-9891
CHESTERFiELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
MEETING DATE:
March 11, 1992
ITEM NUMBER ~
5.A.
SUBJECT:
Worksession on FY93 Proposed Budget
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
This date has been set as a worksession on the FY93 Proposed
Budget. Staff will give a presentation on the Proposed Budget
and departmental expenditures. Attached is summary information
on departmental expenditures. The Proposed Budget document has
been sent separately.
ATTACHMENTS: YES 0
PREPARED BY~
NO 0
1183
~~ 004
COUN"Tfv ADMINISTRATOR 00
SIGNATURE:
.
e
.
Total General Fund Expenditures
Per Capita Comparison
$600
$500
$400
$300
$200
$100
$0
1991
1992
1993
FY93 Constant Dollars
FY91 FY92 FY93
ACTUAL ADOPTED PROPOSED
Administration of Government 12,974,526 12t860,910 11,908,000
Assessment and CoUection of Taxes 5,777.283 5.838,125 5,583.000
Administration of Justice 2,296,093 2.177,330 2, 111 .500
Pubric Safety 42.927,992 43.709.913 41.935,000
Human Services 29.871,060 29,826,216 30.523,400
Community Development 7 ~275,349 7,131,461 6,982~ 100
Sanitation 2.348,036 3~ 183t039 3,284t400
TOTAL 103,470.339 104.726.993 102,3271400
popuration Estimates *. 211 ,300 217.400 227,161
Per Cap ita Cost 490 482 450
*. Source; Chesterfield County, Planning Department
00 005
.
-
Adm in i strat ion Ex pend i tures
Per Capita Comparison
$70
$60
$50
$40
$30
$20
$10
$0
1991
1992
1993
FY93 Constant Dollars
FY91 FY92 FY93
ACTUAL ADOPTED PROPOSED
Department
Board of Supervisors * $253,999 $275,724 $291,000
Clerk to the Board * 208,614 206,069 109.400
County Administrator 341,345 330,683 307,900
Budget & Management 642,971 618,827 581.500
County Attorney 711,828 586,121 610.300
Management Svcs~ AdminA 315,630 1931235 1 77. 1 00
G en er al Services · 745,863 703,697 749.300
BuUdings and Grounds 2,659 t 756 2,704.041 2,434,900
Aegistr a r 234,056 310.190 302,800
Information Systems Technology · 4,512,391 4,625,001 4,135,700
Accounting * 1,415,764 1 ,338,566 1,290,200
Intern al Audit 226,353 269.721 272,300
Purchasing 594.525 577.323 540,100
Leg is 1 alive Li aiso n 104,339 112,815 98,900
Volunteer Coordinator 7,093 81901 6,600
TOTAL ADMIN~ OF GOV'T: 12.974,526 12.860.910 11.9081000
Population Estimates. * 211 .300 217,400 227,161
Per Capita Cost 61 59 '\ 52
* Funds have been re-allocated between categories for FY93.
Refer to budget document for further delai rs.
* * Source: Chesterfield County, Planning Department 00 006
e
e
Assess ment \ Collect ion Ex p e ndi tures
Per Capita Comparison
$5
$30
$25
$20
$15
$10
$0
1991
1992
1993
FY93 Constant Dollars
FY91 FY92 FY93
ACTUAL ADOPTED PROPOSED
Department
Commissioner of Revenue 1,606.772 1,680,737 1.604,900
Assessor 1 ,776.528 1,767,159 1 .679,400
Lie ansa I nspect or 282,167 287,316 284,600
Treasu rer 2,111.817 2,102,913 2,014,100
TOTAL ASSESSMENT &
COLLECTION: 5 ,777,284 51838,125 5,583.000
, 1
Population EsUmates. * 211 ,300 217,400 ~ 227,161
Pe r Cap ita Cost 27 27 .~. 25
*. Source: Chesterfjeld County. Planning Department
00 007
e
e
Administration of Justice Expenditures
Per Capita Comparison
$14
$12
$10
$8
$6
$4
$2
$0
1991
1992 1993
. FY93 Constant Dollars
FY91 FY92 FY93
ACTUAL ADOPTED PROPOSED
1 .038,287 947,750 913,400
262.550 237t947 227,600
73.747 56,822 52,700
15,651 15.008 22,900
5,889 3.830 3,700
899 j 970 915.975 891,200
2.296,093 2,1n,330 2, 111 .500
211 ,300 217,400 227,161
11 10 9
Department
Commonwealth's Attorney
Cou rts;
Circuit Court
G e n eral 0 i 5t rict
JDR Court
Magistrate
Circu it Cou rt Clerk
TOTAL ADMINISTRATION
OF JUSTICE:
Populatjon Estimates..
Per Capi tal Cost
... Source: Chesterfield County. Planning Department
00 008
$250
$200
$150
$100
e
e
Public Safety Expenditures
Per Capita Comparison
$50
$0
1991
1992
1993
FY93 Constant Dollars
PUBLIC SAFETY:
FY91 FY92 FY93
ACTUAL ADOPTED PROPOSED
18,199,011 19,405 t 733 18,357,500
363.101 445,464 397 t 900
1 71207.184 17,532.797 16,522,800
5.956t047 5.538,699 5,986,600
1.202.649 787,221 670.200
42.927,992 43,709.913 41 ,935 ,000
211 ,300 217,400 227t 161
203 201 185
por fce
An i m aJ Control
Fire
Sh eri ff
Comm unlcations Center
TOTAL PUBLIC SAFETY:
Population Estimates. ..
Per Capita Cost
*. Source: Chesterfierd County, Planning Department
00 008.
e
e
Police Department Expenditures
Per Capita Comparison
$100
$80
$60
$40
$20
$0
1991
1992
1993
FY93 Constant Dollars
FY91 FY92 FY93
ACTUAL ADOPTED PROPOSED
Po! ice 18.199t011 19.405,733 18,357.500
Animal Controt 363,101 445,464 397.900
TOTAL POLICE DEPARTMENT: 18.562. 112 19.851 , 197 18,755.400
Population Estimates"" 211 t300 217,400 227. 161
Per Capita Cost" 88 91 83
*. Source: Chesterfield County. Planning Department
o 0 0 .1~ 0
$100
e
e
Fire Department Expenditures
Per Capita Comparison
$80
$60
$40
$20
$0
1991
1992
1993
FY93 Constant Dollars
FY91 FY92 FY93
ACTUAL ADOPTED PROPOSED
Fire Department , 7.207,1 B4 17,532,797 16,5221 BOO
popuraUon Estimates. III 211 .300 217.400 227, 161
Per Capita Cost 81 81 73
* * Source: Chesterfield CountYI PJanning Department
00 011
.
e
e
Human Services Expenditures
Per Capita Comparison
$160
$140
$120
$100
$80
$60
$40
$20
$0
1991
1992 1993
FY93 Constant Dollars
FY91 FY92 FY93
ACTUAL ADOPTED PROPOSED
227,897 195.305 .183,200
689,501 660.227 730,000
166,090 156,803 153,300
t
10,227.605 10,365.215 10,942,700
8,305,506 7,922,097 8,436,600
1,726,553 1,640,475 1,584.200
1,327,560 1,615,946 1 ,556.500
35,575 36,743 35.500
2,817 3,209 3.100
3.285 t 934 3,372,858 3,283,500
53,199 81 ,972 68,600
3,629,912 3,483.707 3.335,900
170.593 265,788 185,300
22,318 25,875 25,000
29,871,060 29.826,216 301523,400
211 .300 217,400 227.161
141 137 134
Department
Adm in istration
Human Resource Mgmt. *
News & Public In!.
Soci a r Services
Men t al H ealth/Ret ard at ion
Health
Juven He Detention Home
Probat ion
Coron e r
Lib rary
Law Lib rary
pa rks and Rae rea t i on
Extension Services
Agricu~tu rat Fair
TOTAL HUMAN SERVICES:
Population Estimates. *
Per Capita Cost
III Funds once budgeted in a miscellaneous category are now budgeted In HRM.
Refer to budget document for further details.
· * Source: Chesterfield County, Planning Department
00 012
'"
..
e
.
$40
Community Development Expenditures
Per Capita Comparison
I
1$33
I
$30
$34
$35
$31
$25
$20
$15
$10
$5
$0
I
1992
I
FY93 Constant Dollars
I
I
FY9~
ACTUAL
FY93
PROPOSED
1991
'993
FY92
ADOPTED
COMMUNllY DEVELOPMENT:
Community Developm ent Ad min. 412,944 377,672 360,300
Economic Development 1.083,194 1,019t579 975,800
Planning 1 .736,765 1 .693t571 1,638,200
Tr an sp ortat i on 354,596 345,276 339,400
Building Inspection 1,953,269 1,901,606 1,967,400-
Engineering 1 J 734,~81 1,793,759 1,701,000
TOTAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT: 7,275,349 7,131.461 6.982,100
Population Estimates. It 211 .300 217,400 227,161
Per Cap ita Cost 34 33 31
* * Source: Chesterfield County, Planning Department
00 0 1.3
~.
~
5, 13 f
~ Uf\ J'
~ 9& (J
~~; ;t:. ~
ftIIP
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVI SORS
AGENDA
~~J~
MEETING DATE: March 11, 1992
ITEM NUMBER;
5.B.
SUBJECT:
Work Session
VDOT 1992-93 Primary Road Funding
COUNTY ADMINISTRATORt 5 COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
The Board will be requested, later this evening, to approve a
priority list of highway projects and public hearing statement
regarding primary and interstate road construction
needs in Chesterfield.
staff will review the attached information at the work session.
AS5
ATTACHMENTS:
YES'
PREPARED BY~ ~
R.J. McCracken
Director of Transportation
NO D
.~
SIGNAT URE :
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
BOS-9891
.,... ...
v
,
"\
I .
II.
III.
e
.
PRIMARY/INTERSTATE PRIORITY WORK SESSION
March 11, 1992
VDOT Allocation Hearing
Funding
Typical Costs
IV. Projects currently in VDOT 6-Year Plan
v. Board Priority List
pipwk.doc
c
- 1 -
00 015
/
n
o
Z tI)
IA -< C
-4 tA ;JJ
::u ...... 0;'1
C 1"'1 :.
~ r %
o
Z
n
o Vl
:z rl
lA VI- n
......-<0
:O(ltZ
C -t 0
n M )0-
-t ~ XI
o -<
:z
e
..,. n z
~~~ ~~M
o 0 "V -t tn ::u
~~~-~~~
lI1Sa gr~
Z
()
o
z V10 "'(l
lA -< ;g
~ ~ i:
c P1 >>0
~ "C ~
5
z
;0"-""
~~
lTl -;l
ZI
~iii
....l
iIlc
:z
2. 0
o
..... ill
AI n
Pl:;o
~M
:;: !;
f9l M
00
C ,....
2: ""'l
-t""'l
;="~
'"'-l::!
........<
P\
..............
:g~
.........
CD
""
, . ,
p..... .. CD [II
"N~~
N~N
___ .......-4
ooo~
~-ofn
;~t:;i
Otn.....,.
:z XI-<
..V1
%
I/)
=i
2~
XI n
m:O
< c:
PlPl
:z C
C
,....
~ ,....
.x-
V) Vi .....
UI -t 0
..... z .....
~ c;') ~
z ~ i::
lit c::: )It
=4 5 ~
~ lit
~ Z ~
o n ~
-'tJ)
'" c .:;
;.. ~ ....\
l4 0 C
~'i S
~ :t; ~
;:: ~
'-.0
Vl
P1 Z
~ 0
5 Z
z g
S ~
,.., :a
Z C
~ !:l
tn 0
:( .z
~ =1
%: ,.."
~
~
Z
.-fI
0""
in ::0
....P1
~~
wy
C
.....
,...
o
J
o
~n::o
,....00
"Tlroac:
C:o::o-6
z-oo'"
o~Ol.A
2:Oa.
.....
n
o ..
z z ..
~ 0 n
~ ~ a
n~1.n
0. ;;u
z
n
o ;u
z '""
....... V) r
c: ~ ..
6 c i
V) n z
o Cl
z
"Tl P1
~~)(
r 0 ~
~ ~ Z
t.i1 t;)
:. ;0 '"1'l
n ~ 1) .....
g ~ s ~
:z i Pi r
""t Cl VI
-t
r:
olz
iiioLn
.....<"'0
:;0...,0
n'E::::D
-1fTl....
z.!:;
-to
z
:t
~
:r 'C
'f .,
~ -(
n
~ 0
.. 1::
en E:
"TI VJ. 0
_c.....z
'::'5:~
z ~
In r
:t X
o
o
-g r
o ~
'>>0
.... Z
TI :E
c ......
Z )r0-
o r
-4
:r
n
)10 0
i) "I:
-a iE
00
;>> z
.... :E
" ~
c ~
z r-
o i:
:J;:
i5
:I:
:t:
.
-<
VI
o
-t
:x:
I't1
:0
i:
o
o
M
LA
2
z
o
o Z
"'0 n
rf\ 0 r
~ ~ ~ ~
..... o-~ VI
Z c
n !l
o
z.
--i
::0
}>-
Z
If)
-0
o
::0
-t
}>
:j
o
z
-i
:::0
C
U')
-f
"
c:
z
o
~
a
Pl
<
.....r'fl
c: ,-
':it 0
c~
rt1
Z
....
n ;JJ
o 0
:0 C
2J ...
0- r'1
o u.
::a CCI
-
:I:
n
:t:
:(
~
00(
I:
..
Z
....
fY1
Z
..
Z
n
M
k"
o
'U
fYl
;;0
~
z
C').
~
c
z
o
f""l
)(
Vi
....
Z
a
o
f
r
,..
,..
o
r
::;
Pi
II'
):-
n
...-t
tn
o
"T\
(J:I
0.
lJ)
"V
I'9'l
n
j;
~
t.n
r1
us
36
z
z
-'
o
z
).
n
....
U1
o
..,
Vl
"'U
V)
M
tn
In
6
z
~
i ~
o"Q Z
~ ~ ~
;IJ ~ ~
n r ....
-t Pl ~
~ 0
z
"1;1
Zlo
i
~
~
.0(
x.
a
r
~
~
""'I(
--I
::0
}>
Z
If)
-0
o
:::0
--I
P
-i
o
Z
---i
;0
C
Ul
-t
-rt
C
Z
o
o
Ul
--1
::u
CD
C
--I
o
Z
00
016
~
"'n
n -
-!~
lED
~C~
-<I:;;
(3"-
- at
"e
'0" -I-
e C. rt
~:::!o
6~O
z
I I n 0
!:g~
t It Z aJ
.CD~!
-(Y.'~
~ 0-
c c;
t;
...
i
I · · B 2
~~~z~
" u ~ ~
!. CD _CD z
"'!l~cS Cl
,.., . :~<g8 :D ~
CD ~~M 0
t;~ - ",0 &II ow
u~~ ~~!Zb CI1 at
........ .... .i
212;t _J:~g ~!~~
mn 0--
~E~ SJ o :D
c: ..., ~~I:if ii-<
.... '1J
- Z E. m gvtf;.!i J'J VI
0,., C"'-
Z ..... 1:"[1 i ""'<
_% IIIVI' 1/1
i ....
.... ZI ....
Cl ZJ -c ~
...
< r
~
~
c
e
C
aJ
~i
RIn-
_..c.
.,.,
-4
,.,.
k
~
n
i
_0
i S - -
-&II
..c
1/1
....
,.,
E
e
--- --------"--- -------......--- --............. ----
C i ~C! i a~ n ~ ~n PD" !!Z,i
'WgDm~2J< ~ "Omi 'Vt, J;lgn
~",;c;q~ir "O.In~.ZIltPl
~......n~--cllliz; .........t1
crr~!;%n~....oc Oflr1!
t::. ,... ~ Z rl Ci ~ M III J: n x ~ I ~ ~
.... D Z J: JD ,." ... ~ ~ ... ;: ~ 0'"
I: Ii ~ VI ;; . t ~ ~ 0 i n f- IT.
..... 0 z .... - f'1 - 'an.........".....
,... In z..c Z "1 ~ ~. ~ g i5l1lr
~:! !('. '" h ....... lit 0
...~ _ - n VI ~ ~ 0
>>!: ~ t f c-'"
~i ~i ~f:
~ n r ..
-4 ,.,
z:
...
fW1
;10
~
i
...
- ,...
,,, ~ r
\II lit r I
~, ;: ~
& ~ D
~E~
E Iio Xl
c....-
..nn
~%......
i
("1
c
z
"1)
...
<
,..,
o
_111
..,.P1
· n
~i-
"0
-~
-c
i
.... i
P1 -t
;a f'l
~ ;0
-,.. ~
~ ~ ~
~ ~ _ r-
'" ....
U10
"!
-z
C1
n
o
Z
In
-t~
~~
~E__
i ~
~Cl
C
Z
c
vt
.., -
",
o
P1
~
,~
~
VI
~
c:
z
c
t
o
"'l ....
Fi...~
St ~.-
- z.
~ C'~
.. ;II .....
0........
n<n
o~;:::o-
c<:4f:
Zzr;
-0111
0.-4
i iD
..
a 'V z X
,Z) V1 :1)
~ 0 'V n ;m
-t < 0 1: i
>> ,., XI . .
n E ;: .. >>
..... ~ --'II -0( -0(
~ 0
z
o
<",.,
,"~i~
co>>- -
~ 1;P 6 '"
~gtu
~
3 -
:r
C)
J:
~
}>
-<
Ul
-I
;U
p
Z
Ul
-U
0 0
;U ---
Vl
--t -;
po ;0
--I -
0 W
C
Z -f
-
--I 0
;0 Z
C
Vl 0
-t ..."
" I
C -
Z C>
0 I
:f
;U )>
rfl -<
<
1'1
Z
C
rt"
Ul
00' 017
n
~
M
tJl
~
ta
hj
H
M
t-t
t1
tU
~
~
lO
...
t\.\
\0
t..n
lO
""
I-i
w
lJ1
CD
...
t\J
o
o
-..J
..
-.....t
OJ
OJ
'-J
w
U1
OJ
t-'
a
.....
f-!
In
U1
U1
,.....,
\D
I\J
Ul
tv
..........
N
o
.........
U)
tv
e
e
t-{j en ~ 'U H
tii M ~ Z
n H [1)
t1 0 ~ ~ 1--3 CI1
H S ~ ~
n
~ ...::: (J) ~
~ t< ~
t--3 ,~
tlj
[J)
H
t-3
N ~ N ..... >
\0 ~
111 0 w w ....... '-0
.... "'" .... ... """
In \.0 m 0 0 t...-l
'r
O'l ~ ~ lJ1 ....... t8 F:
'-I ~ '-I ...J Ln
N ........
~ N \0
U1 tP- Ul 0\ ..0 ts
""*' --.. .... .... ....
N ~ \.0 01 +:... I
N 0 0 .t.a. W \0
0 N ln' W 0 ~
-
tv P tv ...... ......
U1 111 m 0\ w to
~ "'" "'II .... ~ \0
OJ ~ w W U1 tJ.}. ITJ
'-l N .....J ~ ~ ....:
OJ Ul 0'\ W Ul \0 ~
~_. 0
tii
N ~ N ...... ..... ~
OJ J::l. 0\ m ~ \0
..... .... "'" .... ..... \0
Ul \0 N m ....... ~ t1
~ \.0 t.D 0\. -...J "I"'
N '.0 ~ N UI '-0 '
y)
....... '
tv ..... to..) t--' \0
m m '-.I '--1 Ul \.Q
.. .... ""II ... .... U\
0 I-J 0 0 l-J I ;-
Ul t~ w ~ N \.C
Ol t-J to lD U1 ~
,.
N ..... N P ...... ..
.'-0..
m ....J -...,J OJ W \0.:;
~ ..... ..... """ ..... '1'\
N ~ ~ m ~
~ 0\ N OJ In ~.
....... ....... m w 0
1-1 ..
...... t4~
w ~ lO lJ1 ...J
.p.. lD '.) OJ N 0:
..... .... """ ... ~ ~.-
lJ1 0 ...... OJ lJ1 .~
~ ~ OJ '-J 0
0 OJ '-J '-I 0
- 4 -
n
0
Z
C/]
~
~ ~
..-.. C~
(j) ....-..
() \D (JH
> \.0 :j(J
~ .........
I ~O ~
.-< \.0 ~Z ~
tI1 l~ i~ <3
> t""""t"
::r
~ >>-t ~~ Z
0 ~~ tj
> ~
t-' (JQ s.o tJ
::r d< ~
l-4 ....... g. (/)
0 \D ~ tT1 t-1
(j \.0 ~~ ~
> 0\ trt()
I
.-1 \.0 Zt-3
.-.. ~ ~
0
Z ~
C/) ::;d
0
~
00 018
e
tit
Interstate & Primary System-::
I _ . I. I I _. I I ~ - I I - . . - .' . . I
- .. I . I
- .. I ~
Transportatioq: Difilrict: Ricl1mQQd-.
Clleslerfield.
AJnelia
Nottoway
Dillwiddie
Lunenburg -
Brunswick '
..
MerJdenburg
- 5 -
Prince George
00 018
e
N
"
rv
o
..........
\.D
r-.J
6 -
e
n ~ ~ ~
0 }-'.. ..... en
::s ~ r:L n
fJJ ro (t) 0
rt ~ ::J ::s
t1 m
,:: ~ N rt
.0 I I t1
rt ...... t-' ~
~ III 0
::J ::t ::s rt
m ro (l)
~ (D
11 Ii >< .......
.p.. 0 0 ~. \0
I PJ DJ (J) \0
t-' IJ,J ~ rt M
PI .......
::s rt rt ~ t-3
CD 0 0 lQ t<
td
t-h m ~ tv H
Ii I ()
(1) ........ ~ t-' ~
CD PJ III s>> t"I
~ ~ ::t ~
III ro (0 m :;n
~ m tn 0
t; )11
0 0 C
Ii PJ
s:L n
::3 0
(D Z
:( en
.-3
~ ~
c::
n
1--3
H
0
Z
-(J) n
r.a -(J} -(J) -(J) 0
Ul m ~ N (J1
8
a s a a U1
1-'. ...... ...... ........
~ ~ I-' t---J
........ I-' ~ I---J
1-'- ....... ....- ......
0 0 0 0
::J ~ ::J ~
.......... ........... .......... ...........
s ~ s S
1--'. ....... .....- .......
...... ~ ~ .-.
(t) CD CD ro
00 020
e
~r-
(,
)
"
l
(
l))
-.-'//
. ~
f-~//
T:f(
~
/
r
.......
0_
Om
3:...,
I\J
..........
tv
o
..........
\0
N
- 7 -
e
,
\
\
'-
.... - -..
,
.~z
"
,
,
"
,
"
"\.
"-
,
"-
,
,
"
"
I ; ~ I
i I ·
nn
00
z Z
win
21 ;a
C c
~ rl
o 0
z z
(]] =t
~ =4
o :x:
z -
o z
Ul <<L!
X X
-< -<
JT\~
5i :IJ
'1J
~ ~
~ Z
c n
Z 0
o z
fllU1
::0 ~
n C
o n
z :i
r..n 0
-I :z
~ 8
Q s:
6 -n
z r
~
o
(J)
X
-<-U
rn::O<
)>s:o
::0 'l> 0
n:::O-t
0-<
z,
(/)-11
-1Z-<
::lJ-1lO
Cfll-
O::u f
-1(/)1"")
0--1-<
z~~
lJrrl
r
)>
z
00 021
e
e
.... .... ;-0 t.... ...... ..... ..... i
Ol 01 &A- U N .... 0 (XI Q'I "" N
"'0 ::0 :u ft ::0 ::0 ~ ~:o :u if D:ltll L? "U 02:; ::a 9 n :u
01 0 0 0 0 Q no 0 ...... 0 <0 0 0 0 I
., c ~ c: c c: .:: :1= ~ II ... .Q III C ~~ C ..,. -s:: e:
~ rt ('I ... rt rt rt !-t- t1 " Q. t1:J rt ::1 tt 'tII ... n
II fI II fD' II lD 1]11 " Q .... r1' ....... ..... ::r eI " rt to
:v " ~ II :E rt' >.... .. ::r
..... ...... u t... t-" 0'1 w II OJ. r-J. "Jrlo II II 'lJEn N :J 0 ,......
a.. QI. "" ... 0 0\ ~l.Q CQ t"'- en iI 'Uo m :J -= c
&I 0 .. UIi 0 ::ru. 01 ~ (I) rt ~ Q c: CD III CD
III ..... 0 .QII II.,.. I "
"'1 !. CII C '"'1 t1 JJ::r
I>> ....... ::I ... ~ rt "U :d
n t'l ...... 0.. II rt..... PI 0
t-'t- Qt l .. It Ot1 ., Ilf
.... tJ N ( ,< >teal ~ a.
~ c '0 QI :o~
rt '1 ut "'< All
..... ::J .... ~ '<
II Ii < +<
ra II
"
"Uno Ul 0'\ ;lJH HH 0'1 "-i ~96'd' ~~ !;1~" >;;01"1..,.... >- ::a rpQ .... Olo ~ t
1>>00 " tI::J tI ::J ::J i ....:J .., ~~.g~....
.~ D; J1 ..~ 1lIr1 'Urt t-"' - I'-" ~ It :s ~. J:. f: ~ .Q ..a.. t..... 44mt-> .... t.... t.... .......
111 (If ....C11 ....m DI rat D II II 1] rt :7 :J I>> ~-.... QIi :71-1,...111 ::J ,... I- ,.. Pi AI DI Qt
"'Crf ftI ::I ..... " 0., ::J :J ::J :I g '1 'tJ II ~. ...,. rt :s :J t-o.:J ~. rt :J .,..::>> .... rt :;, .....:1 .::. ::J ::J '::J
B~~ (t fI .alii <CIS fa II .. II UI . rt InID._II_ "'-tllIllG m , . II GI . II . II
t-" II a~ 1IC11 CD rI rI Dll gNI1 t'. l.) ..... II ,... ~ fI .... W .,.- 0 .. .... W II III Ui U.
t1 ...... ..... an ~ OI~ rtf'1l ., ::I rt.....t1:J ,,""....:J
Co, Q. .a " (t .. rt ~ Dlo:II .... . ..... PI ...... . .... AI .... . t'". II
0 1.1 ::r ::11 ~. :J t-I+ !I' o a:: B~ ~:=.B~ g5.8~
" rt eto Gg :1:11
tlI tra ::J '< '< ~
0
::0 ::d ~.lPO :u (l ~ n f) :c 9 n ;-i N n r:~~~ n ::0 "0 "U ,,:0 n :c
00000 ::r 0 ::r c :r . I 0 0 0 i ~ 00 :r
cacct: .... ~ II It ~ ...... .... \,0 '",l' ~ ttCrtC I:>> c CC t-I.
rtrtn::Jrt 'tJ n II UIo 'tJ " IJlI 'D ;:t fI rt II :JI. .... rt :r ~ rtr1 'tJ ~
IDlJlI~nI t"Q II rt rt III tog " "" .., II ~ ..,- ...... g. .... ... II II ro
n RI " II ~ II .. .~ n Itrt .... rt " It
.... ,.J ~... " U\ ::I N t1 t1 0 5 ::I ::Jw.." CD t--o fl- II l"j0\ g
oc:aO\~ 0 ::r ~ r1 ::J ~. 1110'10 .... 0 G'lO
coo. g, m :u ::u II " 0.. :JO::::l D. 0 .tit
a 0 0 EI EJ fII .Q .... P
rf &iii it :u
a. 0- ~
:.0; 0 x ::u 0 Q H H ~ H ';Q H ::0 H "'1::0 no
..... " or 0 .... . I . D I 0 . 0 I ...,. 0 0:1
:J rt ., .: a. ::J hot tv 01 1O C ~ t: l.Q < C ~: t1
.a . '"1 rt ...- to lQ D. UI r1 UII n UI mn
en '1 0 II Cd n- UIo UI 0 m lJ G- rtn
D- c. .! I::: a ~ ....... ::ZIP
Df DI N n l~ 0'1 a w. 0.,
.... .... 01 en ~ ..... "" 0 '1Q'1. C t.
" II rt CI;I ...- ...... 0 >to II ....
1;1 ~ .... lit II II
::u ~ .Q CD ....
0 0 ;u :J 0.
Pt " fL '"
0- n a
8
00
022.
;;--
"
I
f
.f
,
I
I
I
I
~}
I
,
I
I
I
I
I
I
_~~: ' J~ '-. ~
" ~. ......., ~~~' '"
~..... I - ~~ -~~
... 0 .J> · ,
It:' :
A J> "II l
I ~-L ~I I
, ~~;;; o.v~s @~, f~J
,':'r _ Hfj,' #o<>~ IiD_ ~ ~ - ..->
_ _ _ _ _ _ ) , 'f.l}'O , .,. .",. ~ I
~c~~~~'~;r'~
8~- &~~
___ _~f _\[
~'nl ~
.\ ~
F;~)
.~-~~
~~
~
r
e
z
r~
II
-~
(
"1
'-
j
\
\......
~.A~.~ -;
- 9 -
e
(~0
~. ~
:0 G')
~ . :!i
;u .......
5 ~
111 C
~ Z
o 0
r OJ
=i t
iii ::0
(JJ ili
iX
00 023
(d n
. a
t..n ~
. -g
...0 .x:.
ru ;0
~
""1;Jnn
Dol a CllI
..... ., I:
.-c- . :;$
.-. t= ...-
::J .,...-<
oJi:I fa .:
..., - .
~ :::-
'"
::u 11 .:;:11;, ""'U :::0
Q 0 0 0 0
~ (: t:: . c::
__ - __ ::1- __
tDl"Df1II::;':tD'
_ t'U (.LJ t1lI D"'-
C> 1O (I- .0-
.~-? ~-
-c:
....... ""'U
~ III
~. ;:.
-
-~
(:L
ra ,..
'"
l."
;;:0
o
~
tD
~
..,
fO
:=
.0
;::
.....
C'"1
~
~
...
::;:t
::t"
III
.
""'U
;lII!;"
-<
)III::
;.
..a
'"
~.
...
;-
:;:u
Q.
~
;:u
~
s=
orl-
rD
t.o.1
D"-
C')
ILl
.::J
nJ
..,
::0
Co
-=
-
fill
ru
GJ
c.u
~
....
"'
....
~
IIlI
:;
;::Q .
~
i:i
:::0
o
:.
ill
:;
#">
;:::u _
,. :::II
... .....
- ra
twO . ...,
..c ...
:s f1J
. n
fD ......
:::J .....-.
-- 0
~
.;;
-g ....
""'f ro
a ..,
< ...
ftlI tD
. t""II
t'D ...-
::::lI ~,
- 0
U1 ::I
~
::0
CII
~
m
...
t..n
n
;:r
ro
....
....
...
.....
:;:Q
~
:::u
CJ
II:
.....
...
n>
a:J
C:Q
e
::
~
a
~
.a
(t-
O
..,
:::J
n:I
."
X
J::
.clI
.:::
...
=-
~
::c
A.
:=
0..
tU
-=
"
~
:::I
o..CJ
:J""
...
.
::::u
ClI.
c;
::v
go
.::
.....
t&I
IA.J
Q-o
00
- .....
n ,
:::11" I'D
_. -a
-0 t.II
""CI
tI:I
,:::J
::r
..
~.
r-
..
cr
-=
....
=-
II=:
~
..
i
.n
n
::r
..;;'
"0
.g.
...
.
""U
:'I'C'"
....c
..
rt)
...a
iU1
(I:)
::0
o
~
III
ru
tQ
OD
~
::J
..
...
..
-0
vt
..
rv
...a
U't
-J
::.:
- ..
. .,
tu a..
.0 Qo
c.J1 .
~.
f'D
::u
a.
i
to
"'"
n
::r
..
:::I
..a
...
_.. n :10 ""'U
=:roo
o .... -= .
..... -a .... :::r
::r""Q f1J _ .
fUi fa .....
:;: s. ~ I'D
.. CO +0
...... ~
"'0 -::
,..
~
II::ID en
IIIol _.
".0
..... :7
;0 - ....
.... D""
lit
en
o
-=
~
Q...
rTI
&i
....
::
!
....
-n
...,
tal
~
:
-<
e
""'0
a
.
~
ro
-u
lI"fi'"
-::-
:u"'V......:.'lD",o....:=O"'V-P-
-.... ....... -+....
o.A to -oQ .. _.a ... -
=r_"':::r-...:r-...
_. :I _.. :::1 _It ;;J
J ".1:J!: J, ~:: J m::
..... ::I ..... :;, .... :::J
:!~ :L~ ~~
.,.~ ... ~.
"""'C .......:: -<
n
Q
&:
~
""'<
:.
a~
...
-rn"U
~?-i
., - _.
g..a':
~~"'"tJ
~fD~
ld ..
g.-
Oo
t
...u
t.J1
n
QI
.,
S
=..'
Q.
::Q
a..
;:0
o
~
RI
W
0'">
0-
o a=:
.c 0-
nI ...
-1 ......
::r
X- _
"a c.n
""CI CII
a -=
. -
::~
: ~
nil
:::tJ .
..... .,.
<"'<
~
::0
g
II::
....
JD
:;
...
(lJ
ut
:n
a
~
.....
fD
ru
Dl
CD
~.
;;
~
PO
....
-u
a
.
e:
-
JJ)
""1'l
)It"
~
:;:0
o
-=
...
I'D
..,..
00
n
~
""ICJ
~
...
='
::T
..
.
~
-::
w
0-
;;~
=-
AlII
U'I
""'U
CJ
.
~
......
,..
""'U
,.....
-<
::0 ::u
(:I C)
c: c
- -.
n;t fa
ta (h
g,o
~)'
C""'J
o
-=
::-
:;T
g
-=
U\
M
;:n
P-
..
::J
...
Ul
r, rJ
(:) ;T
-= f1II
... ton
.,.... -
::rf'P
g ..,
c: .....
J,n
.,.
. . . . . . . ~ . . * . . . . . . ~ . . . . . ~ . ~ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ~ . . . . . * ~ . - .
"f: ~ .
_. lI'r
,...... .....
.... . :v
....... -.
..... a..
fit ...
lit
""U C'"'J
lJ' go
.... .
~.
_. I::.
:::) -
...a ...
....
r
=
&?
ftt
~
rQ
""'II
~
i;
..,
.....
.i
..,
:;
:::c
~
0;
~ ::u ."
~~;
'0 -. ::r
""Q t1>> _ .
"' -
::I ru fa
:r CD
~C:O""tJ
..... :I'It'"
-<
~ .:
-<
("'"]
10
-=
~
-<
~.
g..
.,..
:;.
g,; tn
.. -+
"'l.O
..... ::r
..... -
ra
~ ....
(00
o
t:::
::J
D-
n
o
t::
::.
-<
~.
c:L
fa
w
..
aJI
~
'""
......
~
::t
f1:I
.,..
n
:r
"'P
-g
~
::i
:::)""'
...
.
"'U
~
-<
-
.
0)
..Q
U't
........
fill
~
en
n
~
"Q
"U
ro
::I
=
~
-<
Q')
III
~
g
::a
a..
N
:u
o
~
fa
tAJ
~
o
..
::I
...
lA
~
p,.
%:
~
:::J
a..
...
.,.
a..
:::0
p.
;::
I1J
..,
Q..
e.
fa
~
=
_ :::z;t
nO
RJ c:
::J --
...... 1D
...
10 -
....
lJ'J ...
~
~
:J
,.
.,.
("'l.
::1"
to
~
tv
.....
~
J3.
:c
....
...,
-t
o
.
~
~
.....
...
::n
0.
:;;
a'
c
.....
f1lI
~
~
....
=
~.
;::
U\
~
-u
'0
."
::I
::r
*"
...
"'U
~
-::
~
~
LC
VI'
0..
..,.
;;
:=u
?-
...
fU
...g
lJ1
=-
fO
...
Q..
o
.
~
......
fD
::u
~
f
xfTl-2.
S; :; d':
.,....-.
::r - =r "'T1
- -= _. ...
g!~i
_.. -u...
::r ~ -=
.....c '"
..:
.,.,
...,
i
.,
'-<
-.;J
.....
:!.
;:Q -U
- ... . ....
~ PO
::::r- -
:r~
~::t
f ~
a:-t
.,. ..
-...c
rn
=:31
j,.I:J
...
.-
...0
c.II
f'~~
~~~
c . ..,
..... :a- -..
ft) _. ....,.
...,... ~.
o.~
""13 a..
~
"""< :-J
"f""
""'
~
..
tv
...a
.....,
- ....... :::u
. , a
CU-obC
t.1I r..n .......
filii
U)
0<-
C)
10
en
-..J
..
ru
.u
UlI
~
...
JD
""
,..
~.
~
..g
.,.
;:II
...
.-
Q.-
0'
.
;S.
;;
:0
~
g-..
::u
c:)
c::
-
fD
<;
0-
Pol
=-
:J
~~
- ~
.,bg
'-" -
f1lI
- ~
, .
ru ~
...a c..I1
VI
ut
::u
o
~
rD
0"-
00
Ilk
~
...
eft
.x:
t=
..a
-=
...
=-
:.
:a
A.
c:::J
~
~
t:::
n
....
;.
~
:7
IU
.
~
~
......
~
-0
"g
f1I
:::II
:2"
~
.
""1'J
lW:"
-::-
;;-
:s
fD
'"
"""U
0-
.
=-:
....-
...
-U
...
.....c
..
-0
(.It
.:;
+cJ -
.... .,..
o -.
-< '"
f1l fD
. n
I'D .....
::::I .....
_0
an ::II
w
;u
00
~
...
.p-
ut
M
::r
...
::l.
f'II
"""'
;t.l
c:a..
;:U
CII
~.
tD
OJ
to
CO
~
..
'='
..
U'
~ ~
_ ""'D
a ::i 0
. -- .
~. .... =--
..... .., _.
-- n -
f'IlI :T fg
"'1J~--o
II'II"'".Q 1I'If""
-;:rg--::-
;;u
o
~-
....
0---
~
,.-01
.
..a
UI
"Tl ~
-. 0
-< -=
... ....
..."nIi
C '-I
., tt~
:-0.
X.
fU
~
o
S-
fU
n)
c:u
CD
r-
o
10
"0
;'
.u
....
*-
:::--~~~
~::::'C ("'"J'-"
o g 0' c:;
ll:: =: -= ...,
.... ..... ..... ::;I
...... . ... ro
=:r ;::::r....
o ru 0
CI:D~;Q
....a:JI,ftc..
fD let.
~ :;:ICI
A- Q,.
-= c::Jl
., .....
__ (:L
;a:
~ :t
"< (:l...
....
~~
o..~
aJ z::
... ...
~. ..
~ ~.
rb
:;:0 , -<
P..
:;:0
<:)
~
ru
c;
m.o
:::;lI
III
'"
n
~
-a
-Q
m
::II
~
....
.
~
.<
;:0
o
~.
tP
(.d
0'"
o
r-
ILl
::J
~
t"ft
OJ
<"
D.
00
"U
~
~l
~
-i
-<
-0
:;J3
c::J
"-/I
fT1
~
-..
I~
I~
It:3
l;g
10
IS
i~
I~
l~
· t:-
I~
I~
I t...1
i
l~
11:::.,
rtl
UI
r-1"
::u
-u
........
o
z
;:
CJI
::.:
-i
r;::I
~
q
~
-..
~
""U
~
....~
0"1
rl
-4
~;
m
UI
C"'")
~
"""r;J
~
c::: J
~
UI
-I
~
..,...
.....,
~I
".,
n
Q
=-
'2
m
oz::
c;
m
Cf
-u
::u
~
:::u
:J
-'1
~
~
~
Ul
-t
--<I
0-
024.
"',
-")f-
-- ..........
." ." ,!\ -... .... *'
I ~ \
, \\
I
f
,
I
I
I
I
I _ \ _
l{OO) ;u \ ~
1 ~ ." .....~ -""
I . · ..- .. '. : . '.'- ~\...........-- A
'" ;.. ..-....: r;;r '.... ell 0':1 \
· "',. . ill I
I ": .. !l (:, p+ \ ~_)
I ':. ,;.... i aJi :'", ( \ =-
' " .......'" ':lilt.. .
I · - ":.' ;;' \
I ; --" . .' ~X-~ ~ -t>
I .' .;?~."
I / 4...-
I _~- ~ ,," :.
' ~ ~,:l 'U I
- · 1" ;Ill I
--. , 5 r ~ r'
" " ") J> 3 , '
'- .. --~ - ~,.---~. ~'ri!ifJ~--:~,,;t
~ \ I /~~ /~ ~ - .- ~r-I~~. (~) (~
(:;. , /~P~. - c:E. -1 U lS\
. -______~'J .--,/ o''' ~ 'U UI
~ .-' ''3l: _____-.\.'11 " , l . (ii
I. -~ , .' \. ..~ :u %
'\ ' 'i- I Ie) ___ _:-=- _~_._-;_ ~ ~
\~-=-~~=:~~~~'~--~./~: ~l /f( i j
- e-,--.-~_ .'- --.. (<''\i 1(0 " -' \~X\l/ ~ t
---.-~--\'~~->II.) I (~y if' - - ~ ~
-. /-.---. ~!%'I ') III
- ~(/// rr.-~~~~~)
\ \._-.../' ..-j;...)\
-'_f'---"': :)(") 4.-.'l
,~-----
-z
J~
r
~-----n
_t~
'\ ~--:>.
\(:..-r,
)/,
[/ I
/. /~J~
l~t~
5)
~./[
l '.......
("'.J
~ (
\(
4'~,
l\J
.........
N
o
...........
lJ)
tv
e
e
~"V--f
f ~
</ i.)
"
I
\
\-
...... -.. --~
"-
"
"
- 11 -
00 025
e
e
VDOT 1992-93 PRIMARY ALLOCATION HEARING
APRIL 8, 1992
I AM HARRY DANIEL, CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD OF
SUPERVI SORS OF CHESTERFIELD COUNTY. I "APPRECIATE THE
OPPORTUNITY TO APPEAR BEFORE YOU TODAY TO PRESENT
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY'S PRIMARY AND INTERSTATE ROAD
NEEDS. WE WOULD LIKE TO, ONCE AGAIN,. SUBMIT, FOR THE
RECORD, CHESTERFIELD'S PRIORITY LIST FOR HIGHWAY
PROJECTS. 'A~L OF THESE PROJECTS ARE VERY IMPORTANT TO
THE COUNTY. IN THE INTEREST OF SAVING TIME, I WILL
ONLY SPEAK TO SOME OF OUR MORE URGENTLY NEEDED
IMPROVEMENTS.
WE FULLY SUPPORT THE WIDENING OF ROUTE 360 FROM TURNER
. ROAD
TO
GENITO
ROAD
CURRENTLY
SHOWN
IN
THE
DEPARTMENT'S SIX YEAR PLAN.
SINCE THE OPENING OF
ROUTE 288, ANOTHER SECTION OF ROUTE 360, JUST WEST OF
THE ROUTE 288 INTERCHANGE, HAS BECOME VERY CONGESTED.
DURING PEAK PERIODS, TRAFFIC ROUTINELY BACKS UP FROM
-OLD HUNDRED ROAD ONTO ROUTE 288. WE, THEREFORE,
RECOMMEND THAT YOU WIDEN ROUTE 360 TO ~IGHT (8) LANES
FROM ROUTE 288 THROUGH THE OLD HUNDRED ROAD
INTERSECTION.
THIS WIDENING SHOULD BE CONSTRUCTED AT
THE SAME TIME OR BEFORE YOU WIDEN THE SECTION OF
ROUTE 36'0 FROM COURTHOUSE ROAD TO WALMSLEY BOULEVARD.
- 1 -
00 026
e.
e
THE SECOND PROJECT I WOULD LIKE TO DISCUSS IS THE
CONSTRUCTION OF ROUTE 288 NORTH, FROM THE POWHITE
PARKWAY/ROUTE 288 INTERCHANGE TO ROUTE 60. WE HAVE
JOINTLY BEEN WORKING ON THE DESIGN OVER THE PAST
SEVERAL MONTHS. WE ARE CONFIDENT THE REMAINING DESIGN
ISSUES CAN BE RESOLVED ONCE THE FUNDING FOR THE
CONSTRUCTION IS COMMITTED. WE URGE YOU TO MAKE
FUNDING FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF ROUTE 288 NORTH A
HIGH PRIORITY. THE LOOPS AND. RAMPS AT THE POWHITE
INTERCHANGE SHOULD BE THE FIRST PHASE OF THE
CONSTRUCTION. PLANS FOR THE LOOPS AND RAMPS ARE
COMPLETED. THERE IS NO REASON THEY CAN I T BE
CONSTRUCTED TH! S SPRING SO THAT OUR CITI ZENS WON IT
HAVE TO CONTINUE TO USE THE INADEQUATE SECONDARY ROADS
IN THE AREA.
THE IMPROVEMENT OF THE CENTRALIA ROAD/CHESTER
ROAD INTERSECTION IS ALSO HIGH ON OUR PRIOIRTY LIST.
I AM SURE yOU ARE AWARE OF THE TRAGEDY THAT RECENTLY
OCCURRED AT THIS INTERSECTION. IT IS CRITICAL THAT A
TRAFFIC SIGNAL BE IMMEDIATELY INSTALLED AND ADEQUATE
TURN LANES PRIOVIDED ON ALL THE APPROACHES SO THAT
FUTURE ACCIDENTS WILL BE PREVENTED.
- 2 -
00 027
e
e
THE LAST PROJECT I WANT TO DISCUSS WITH YOU TODAY
IS THE WIDENING OF CHIPPENHAM PARKWAY FROM THE POWHITE
PARKWAY TO 1-95. WE ARE PLEASED TO SEE THAT
ENGINEERING AND RIGHT OF WAY ACQUISITION FOR THE
PROJECT IS INCLUDED IN YOUR SIX YEAR PLAN. WE URGE
YOU TO PROVIDE ADDITIONAL FUNDING SO THAT THE WIDENING
CAN BE CONSTRUCTED.
AGAIN I WANT TO THANK YOU FOR THE OPPORTUNITY TO
APPEAR BEFORE yOU. I WILL BE GLAD TO ANSWER ANY
QUESTIONS.
- 3 -
00 028
.\
l
~ ~ r :.
r. _ i ~ ... --.
805-9891
1J,/1 ,
.... .
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
MEET ING DATE :
March 11,
6.A.
1992
SUBJECT;
ITEM NUMBER:
EMERGENCY ITEM - Adoption of an Ordinance Amending ~
14.1-1 of the Code of the County of Chesterfield,
1978, as amended, Relating to the Incorporation of
all driving violations into the County Code
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: ~J ~
R4!:l:-~J.~ "1 CUI PNtVl.OJ b~ ".--- I
pubP~ ~j (~ fJld- '3,
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
Every year the Board of Supervisors adopts an amendment
to Section 14 .1-1 of the County Code, adopting by reference
into the County Code . all state motor vehicle offenses. The
effect of this incorporation is to allow County police officers
to charge motorists under County surrunonses for such violations
as reckless driving and failure to yield the right of way.
By charging local motorists under the County Code, all fines
are received py the County treasurer rather than being sent to
the State Literary Fund.. In order to keep the County Code
current, the Board annually must revise ~ 14.1-1 to incorporate
all changes made under State law during the previous year.
At the July 24, 1991 Board meeting the annual ordinance
amendment to ~ 14.1-1 of the County Code was undertaken to
incorporate the amendments to the state traffic code that were
enacted by the 1991 General Assembly, and also to incorporate
for the first time a juvenile drunk driving violation into the
County Code..
(continued)
PREPARED B~ I ~
Steven L.. Micas
County Attorney
ATTACHMENTS: YES.
NO [J
0600:257.1
SIGNAT URE :
~
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
00 0
J \
, .. ..... .
.
e
AGENDA ITEM
March 11, 1992
Page 2
The County's Attorneys office was notified recently that
certain individuals being charged under the County Code for
drunk driving are questioning whether the ordinance amendment
was properly noticed to the public. The public notice
emphasized the adoption into the County Code of the juvenile
drunk driving amendment, but not the general annual adoption
of the other amendments to the State Code.
Recommendation: In order to clarify any ambiguity in the
validity of the law, staff recommends that the attached
ordinance be adopted on an emergency basis.
0600:257.1
00 0 2.
\
.)
\
..
e
e
AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE CODE OF THE COUNTY
OF CHESTERFIELD, 1978 , AS AMENDED, BY AMENDING
AND REENACTING ARTICLE I, SECTION 14 ~ 1-1 RELATING TO
THE INCORPORATION OF ALL DRIVING VIOLATIONS
INTO THE COUNTY CODE
BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield
County:
(1) That Section
Chesterfield, 1978, as
read as follows:
14.1-1 of the Code of the County
amended, is amended and reenacted
of
to
See. 14 . 1- 1 .
Adoption of state law.
Pursuant to the authority of section 46.1-1313 of the Code
of Virginia, 1950, as amended, all of the provision and
requirement of the laws of the state ,contained in ti tIe 46. 2.L
afi6: article 2 of chapter 7 of titl~ 18.2 and article 9 of
chapter 11 of title 16.1 of the Code of Virginia, as in force
on July I, 1990 July 1. 1991, except those provisions and
requirements the violation of which constitutes a felony, and
except those provisions and requirements which by their very
nature can have no application to or within the county, are
hereby adopted and incorporated in this chapter by reference
and made applicable within the county ~ References to "highways
of the state 11 contained in such provisions and requirements
hereby adopted shall be deemed to refer to the streets,
highways and other public ways within the county. Such
provisions and requirements are hereby adopted, mutatis
mutandis, and made a part of this chapter as fully as though
set forth at length herein, and it shall be unlawful for any
person, within the county, to violate or fail, neglect or
refuse to comply with any provision of title 46. 2..L. er article
2 of chapter 7 of title 18.2 or article 9 of chapter 11 of
title 16..1 of the Code of Virginia which is adopted by this
section; provided, that in no event shall the penal ty imposed
for the violation of any provision or requirement hereby
adopted exceed the penalty imposed for a similar offense under
title 46.2~ er article 2 of chapter 7 of title 18.2 or
article 9 of chanter 11 of title 16.1 of the Code of
Virginia.
0600:260.1
00 0 3
.-
805-9891
{p,8.
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVl SORS
AGENDA
March 11, 1992
MEETING DATE:
ITEM NUMBER;
6.B.
SUBJECT:
Route 360 Widening
(Route 288 through Old Hundred Road)
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR' 5 COMMENTS:
R~c.~~cl ,4~
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
The Board is requested to adopt the attached resolution asking
the Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) to transfer
Route 288 North design funds to a Route 360 design project.
BACKGROUND: Traffic routinely backs up on Route 360 during peak
hours from Old Hundred Road through the Route 288 interchange.
These backups are expected to grow even worse in the future.
Route 360 needs to be widened to eight (8) lanes from the
Route 288 interchange through Old Hundred Road to relieve this
congestion. No funds are available in VDOT's primary six year
plan for this widening.
The design of the Route 360 widening could be funded with the
remaining Route 288 North revenue sharing funds (approximately
$142,000). The County will probably have to prepare the design
because of VDOT's commitments to other projects. Once the design
is completed, staff anticipates the $4 million construction cost
can be financed through future VDOT primary allocations and
developer contributions.
AS3
PREPARED BY: J! ~~r:k~n
Director of Transportation
ATTACHMENTS: YES B
NO Cl
SIGNATURE =
~
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
00 0
'f"t
e
.
. "
Agenda - Route 360 Widening
March 11, 1992
Page 2
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Board adopt the attached
resolution requesting VDOT to transfer the remaining Route 288
North revenue sharing design funds to the Route 360 widening
project from Route 288 through the Old Hundred intersection. The
County Administrator should be authorized to enter into contracts
with VDOT and/or private consultants for the design of the
Route 360 project.
A83
00 0 5
~"\
..
~
~.('
#
',..
....
#*-
~
.
.
~
.
.
.
.
:
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
:
.
. ./
....
.,."
.."
....
l~
... . . .' j( II ~:' /
~
\.
e
"; . .
r.......\
............~ ...... ~
.JlIIIII-;" ..... .
' .t~ \
\ ........ '. .
:. ~ .. \ :Lrt't\
'>- j--~_____ CO~olfYl'E~
,....:..t "f'-
of
0.,
0-
}....
~ ~i~--.__
.......,. .y "#, # ----------
-~~.~ o. n_ 4 ~#_;-~-~
-.It -- ---- '..i~ 0
J""_u ~- . -~-~- - ~--lr---~-
~\
::d :
o ':
~ i
trJ :v>
('~
......
.... ......'
~ T
....
.,
1......
~.'."
"""
##~ t,........#
'1'".."", #..'#
-'#
,..,
~
fj',\<~,;~;/:::>:,."," i:<<::.>"::. " """.. '. "." . .
.."".".:: :.~.'-' .":::. ...:::.:::." :: ro', ..-....." -:'. '\
.":: /""~~:~.' '. \\\\\): r-~~~: .)>:? <-. \ / ~ >.::
Z ".~..". "" . ".. b"."6"...
" : :~_.'. :". ::'~:~:' : \ ~-./ \::.: 872:
w
0\
o
:e:
H
o
tIj
~
H
Z
G'l
~ )
~-b
~
--
#
e
e
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY: At a regular
meeting of the Board of
Supervisors, held at the Courthouse
on March 11, 1992, at 3 p.m.
WHEREAS, Traffic congestion on Route 360, from the Old
Hundred Road intersection through the Route 288 interchange,
creates an unsafe condition; and
WHEREAS, This congestion is expected to grow worse in the
future; and
WHEREAS, Chesterfield County and the Virginia Department of
Transportation (VDOT) financed with "revenue sharing" funds
the design of Route 288 North, from the Powhite Parkway to the
Powhatan County Line; and
WHEREAS, The balance of the "revenue sharing" funds on the
Route 288 North design project is approximately $140,000.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Chesterfield County
Board of Supervisors requests VDOT to transfer the balance of the
Route 288 North "revenue sharing" funds to a Route 360 design
project for the widening of Route 360 to eight (8) lanes from the
Route 288 interchange through the Old Hundred Road intersection.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Board requests VDOT · s
authorization to proceed with the design if VDOT determines that
it cannot proceed with the design in a timely fashion.
Vote:
Certified By:
Theresa M. Pittsj Interim Clerk
to the Board of Supervisors
.00 0 7
805-9891
Ute./.
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVI SORS
AGENDA
MEETING DATE:
143rch 11, ..1992
ITEM NUMBER~
6.C.l.
SUBJECT:
Appointment to Youth Services Citizen Board
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
/J1.va., ~ lVo.o /J(~ J. ~ tL f).. - :1(,'C; 2. /I1~.
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
Miss Katie Johnson, 11440 Marsden Road, Chester 1 VA 23831/ Bermuda District.
Miss Johnson is appointed as a new youth member of the Youth Services Citizen
Board. She is a sophomore at Thomas Dale High Schooll serving as an officer
of her school's ecology club. She works with an animal rights group~ secves
her church in a leadership capacity, and plays all-season soccec.
PREPARED BY~ ~~d. &,,~
~t1&evtnr-.
ATTACHMENTS: YES C
NO II
SIGNATURE:
c/<<
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
00 0
..,
(p f e. J
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
MEETING DATE:
March :11, 1992
ITEM NUMBER;
6.C.2.
SUBJECT;
Appointment of 5 new members to the Drug & Alcohol Abuse Task Force
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: . ~_ I .-J
~ ~ ~ /Jt~c:t.Ud- d;p.. 01.:;1(,-9l.
~J/>J~~~~~:/tJ~
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
The following citizens are new appointments to the Drug & Alcohol Abuse Task Force:
Miss Anna Beth Caulder, 7504 Hadley Lane, Chesterfield VA 23832, Clover Hill District
Ms. Judith A. DiMeo, 10703 Gadwell Court, Chestecfield VA 23832, Matoaca District
Mr. Walter Nunnery, 9213 Great Bridge Road, Richmond, VA 23237, Dale District
Mr. Ben Patrone, 1406 paigewood Court, Midlothian, VA 23113, Midlothian District
Mrs. Carolyn Studdacd, 701 N. Pinetta Drive, Richmond, VA 23235, Midlothian District.
PREPARED BY~
~J.~ .
~. dftt.~ IY1 ~
ATTACHMENTS: YES []
NO lit
SIGNATURE:
~
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
00 0
BQS.9891
805-9891
:.
~ ~ Ci 3.
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
MEETING DATE:
March 11, 1992
ITEM NUMBER:
6.C.3.
SUBJECT;
Appointments to the Soils and Foundations Commission
COUNTY AOMINISTRATORt S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
At the January 2, 1992 meeting, the Board created a Soils
and Foundations Corrunission to study the issue of shrink/swell
soils in Chesterfield County. (See attached minutes). The
Commission was to be composed of citizens and industry
representatives; however, to-date, the Board has only appointed
five citizen members. Mr. Daniel has suggested that the Board
complete the . appointment process by making appointments from
the following. groups:
ATTACHMENTS: YES .8
0803:299.1
(Continued)
PREPARED BY~
NO [J
'YS-4
SIGNATURE:. ".
~OUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
00 01
~
,
"..
--
AGENDA ITEM
March 11, 1992
Number
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
15
.
~
--
Group
Chesterfield Business Council
Realtor
Builder
Soils Engineer
Financial/Mortgage Institution
~iVl1 Association
Ci tizens at large
Attorneys (could be
substituted for any of the
above who are attorneys.)
Existing appointees from each
magisterial district
TOTAL
The Rules must be suspended by unanimous vote if the Board
wants to nominate and appoint at the same meeting.
00 011
:- .
'.
.
III. APPOINTMENTS THAT SERVE FOR A FIXED TERM THAT MAY NOT BE
ALTERED BY THE BOARD
Mr. Daniel instructed the County Administrator to report to
the Board, at, the appropriate time, on the Central Virginia
Waste Management Authority.
When asked, Mr~ Micas stated committees whose terms have not
expired, as well as committees who serve at the pleasure of
the Board, could be brought forward at any time for
replacement of those members currently serving.
SHRINK/SWELL SOIL COMMISSION
Mr. Warren stated prior to the new Board taking office',
concerns had been expressed and addressed regarding damaged
foundations to homes within County and requested a commission
be created to address defining the problems regarding
shrink/swell soils including, but not limited to, the building
inspection aspect, the management responsibilities and to
generally investigate damage to homes and seek preventive
measures through stricter building requirements and developing
solutions to assist homeowners with their individual problems.
He stated he 'felt the commission should be an independent
group who would report to the Board on its findings over a
period of time. He recommended the commission be comprised of
at least one representative from each district and recommended
Mr. Bob Olsen and Mr. Rick Phelps be made a part of the
commission as well as additional members from the business and
housing communities and other aspects of the community to
obtain the best possible recommendations from the commission.
Mr. McHale stated the issue of shrink/swell soils had been
addressed by the new Board prior to taking office and he also
supported the creation of the commission. He further stated
he felt the commission should consist of a panel of citizens
affected by this issue as well as from the business community
such as real estate, banking and legal representatives and
should be charged with recommending solutions to the problem.
Mr. Barber stated he concurred with the creation of the
commission and,also felt it was the Board's responsibility to
address the problem adequately as the new Board had firmly
committed to the citizens to address and seek solutions to the
problem. He f~rther stated he felt the commission should act
independently but report to the Board on a regular basis and
should be charged wi th not only recommending solutions but
recommending preventive measures for the future. He noted he
felt the commission should develop a program on how it would
function with the Board's approval and should be comprised of
at least one representative from each district. He expressed
he felt the commission would not be short term and should
involve people from all aspects of the community. He noted he
concurred with Mr. Warren's recommendations for members to the
commission.
Mr. Colbert stated he concurred with the comments expressed
and recommended Mr. Robert Karnes also be appointed to the
commission, representing Matoaca District.
Mr. Daniel clarified Mr. Bob Olsen ~ould represent Midlothian
District, Mr. Rick Phelps would represent Clover Hill District
and Mr. Robert Karnes would represent Matoaca District. He
noted Dale and Bermuda Districts would submit representatives
for the commission at the. Board meeting on January 8, 1992.
He stated the purpose of the commission would be to
investigate and recommend solutions to the problem of
shrink/swell soils within the County and requested the
commission also include recommendations for legislation which
may by required at both state and local levelw
92-13
1/2/92
00 012
-
.
On motion of Mr. Warren, seconded by Mr. Colbert, the Board
established a commission whose purpose would be to investigate
and recommend solutions to the problem of shrink/swell soils
within the County and would include, but not be limited to,
recommendations for legislation which may by required at both
state and local level.
Mr. Barber expressed concerns as to legislation being
addressed possibly excluding other options and requested the
commission be instructed to submit to the Board, the direction
in which they would proceed with no limits at this point in
time and the Board would address at that time, the
commission's duties and responsibilities.
Mr. Daniel called for the vote on the motion made by Mr.
Warren, seconded by Mr. Colbert, to establish a commission
whose purpose would be to investigate and recommend solutions
to the problem of shrink/swell soils within the County'" and
would include, but not be limited to, recommendations for
legislation which may by required at both state and local
level.
Vote: Unanimous
Mr. Daniel, as Chairman, appointed Mr. McHale and Mr. Warren
to the School .Board Liaison Committee; Mr. Barber and Mr.
Colbert to the Benefits committee; Mr. Barber and Mr. Colbert
to the Space N~eds Committee; and Mr. McHale and himself to
the Budget and Audit Committee.
4. DEFERRED ITEMS
o REQUEST FOR BINGO RAFFLE PERMIT
Discussion, comments and questions ensued relative to the
requirement of non-profit organizations obtaining 50l(e)3 IRS
tax exemptions.
On motion of Mr. Barber, seconded by Mr. McHale, the Board
deferred consideration of a bingo/raffle permit for Poseidon
Swimming, Inc. for calendar year 1992 until January 22, 1992.
Vote: Unanimous
When asked, Mr. Micas advised the request could be deferred
unt~l the regularly scheduled meeting on January 8, 1992.
Mr. Barber amended his motion, seconded by Mr. McHale, to
defer consideration of a bingo/raffle permit for Poseidon
Swimming, Inc. for calendar year 1992 until January 8, 1992.
Vote: Unanimous
Mr. Micas noted the Board could consider flexibility regarding
the requirement of non-profit organizations obtaining 50lce)3
IRS tax exemptions in their proposed legislative package when
addressed later in the afternoon.
On motion of Mr. Barber, seconded by Mr. Colbert, the Board
suspended its rules to amend the agenda to add to existing
Item 5., another Executive Session Pursuant to section
2.1-344(a)(7), Code of Virginia, 1950, as Amended, for
Consultation with Legal Counsel Relating to Legal Challenges
to certain Pre-Existing Zoning. Vulcan Materials Company v.
Board of Supervisors, et. al. and Elliot v. Board of
supervisors.
Vote: unanimous
92-14
1/2/92
00 013
BOS-9891
&./),
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
MEETING DATE: March 11, 1992
ITEM NUMBER:
6.D.
SUBJECT:
Streetlight Installation Cost Approvals
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR1 S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION;
This item requests Board approval of various Streetlight
Installation Cost Approvals presented by Magisterial District.
Streetlight requests from individual citizens or civic groups are
received in the Department of Environmental Engineering-. Staff
requests cost quotations from Virginia Power for each request
received. When the quotation 1s received, staff re-exam1nes each
request and presents them at the next available regular meeting
of the Board" of Supervisors for consideration~ Staff provides
the Board with an evaluation of each request relative to the
three evaluation criteria set forth in the Policy:
1. Streetlights should be located at intersections;
2. There should be a minimum average of 600 vehicles per
day (VPD) passing the requested location if it 1s an
intersection, or 400 VPD if the requested location is
not an intersection;
CONTINUED NEXT PAGE
ATTACHMENTS: YES )(
PREPARED BY~ ftd;/I1c~4(
Richard ~MCElfiSh, P.E.
Director
Environmental Engineering
NO []
SIGNAT URE =
~
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
00 014
\ ..
\I . l,..-'"
.
.
Streetlight Cost Approvals
Meeting Date: March 11, 1992
Page 2
3. Petitions are required and should include 75% of
residents within 200 feet of the requested location and
if at an intersection, a majority of those residents
immediately adjacent to the intersection.
Cost quotations from Virginia Power are valid, in general, for a
period of 90 days. The Board, upon presentation/of the cost quo-
tation may approve, defer, or deny the expenditure of funds for
the streetlight installation. If the expenditure 1s approved,
staff authorizes Virginia Power to install the streetlight. A
denial will cancel the project and staff will so notify the
requestor. A deferral will be brought before the Board again
when specified.
BERMUDA DISTRICT:
* Intersection of Glen Oaks Drive and Old Centralia Road
Cost to install light: $362.00
Meets minimum criteria
CLOVER HILL DISTRICT:
* Intersection of Red Chestnut Court and Red Chestnut Drive
Cost to install light:. $3,647.00
Does not meet minimum criterion for vehicles per day
* Mid-point of Red Chestnut Drive
Cost to install light: $1,714.00
Does not meet minimum criteria fOL intersection, vehicles
per day, or petition
MATOACA DISTRICT:
* Intersection of Sacks Lane and Sasha Court
Cost to install light: $2,173.00
Meets minimum criteria. Requestor priority 1 of 6.
* Vic1n1ty of 4306 Sacks Lane
Cost to install light: $2,280.00
Does not meet minimum criteria for intersection or vehicles
per day. Requestor priority 2 of 6.
00 015
'.
111 .... ~
e
e
Streetlight Cost Approvals
Meeting Date: March 11, 1992
Page 3
MATOACA DISTRICT {cont~d):
* Vicinity between 20805 and 20807 Sasha Court
Cost to install light: $2,444.00
Does not meet minimum criteria for intersection or vehicles
per day. Requestor priority 3 of 6.
* Vicinity of 20904 Sasha Court in cul-de-sac
Cost to install light: $1,865.00
Does not meet minimum criteria for intersection or vehicles
per day. Requestor priority 4 of 6.
* Vicinity of 20812 Shaker Drive
Cost to install light: $1,766.00
Does not meet minimum criteria for intersection or vehicles
per day. Requestor priority 5 of 6.
* Vicinity of 20805 Shaker Drive
Cost to install light: $1,615.00
Does not meet minimum criteria fOL intersection or vehicles
per day. Requestor priority 6 of 6.
* Beechnut Avenue, upgrade streetlights located on poles RDSO,
SD62, TD43, and UD23 from existing 7000 lumen MV or 3300
lumen MV to 8000 lumens HPSV. This replaces a request for
the installation of a streetlight at 5725 Beechnut Avenue
denied at the January 8, 1992 Board meeting in lieu of
upgrading the existing lights on Beechnut Avenue.
Cost for RDSO 7000 lumen to 8000 lumen upgrade: $199.90
Cost for TD43 7000 lumen to 8000 lumen" upgrade: $199.90
Cost for 8D62 3300 lumen to 8000 lumen-upgrade: $180660
Cost for UD23 3300 lumen to 8000 lumen upgrade: $180.60
Total Cost of upgrades: $761.00
Existing streetlights, policy criteria not applicable.
00 016
..
Fl..
e
STREETLIGHT REQUEST e
Bermuda District
,. ~
..
REQUEST
RECEIVED: January 28, 1992
ESTIMATE
REQUESTED: January 29, 1992
ESTIMATE
RECEIVED: February 20, 1992
DAYS ESTIMATE
OUTSTANDING: 22
COST TO INSTALL STREETLIGHT: $362.00
NAME OF REQUESTOR: Lawrence Quigley
ADDRESS: 10403 Hamlin Place, Chester, VA 23831
PHONE NUMBER: HOME - 796-2814
WORK - 530-6284
o
REQUEST IS LOCATED AT THE INTERSECTION OF
Glen Oaks Drive and Old Centralia Road
c==J REQUEST IS NOT AT AN INTERSECTION. REQUESTED LOCATION IS
c==J A POLE ALREADY EXISTS AT THIS LOCATION
POLICY CRITERIA:
INTERSECTION:
VEHICLES PER DAY:
PETITION:
Qualified
Qualified
Qualified
COMHENTS: This is an entrance to the Glen Oaks subdivision.
Please see attached letter from requestor.
Attachments? Yes
'00 017
\
~~~
e
e
1 0403 Hamlin Place
Chester1 Va') 23631
January 25, 1992
Richard ~ Leonard
Chesterfield County
Envlornmantcl Engineering
P,O, Box 40
Chesterfield. Va 1.' 23832
Dear Mr. Leonard,
I am writing to request that you would p!ease consider our application for installation
of street lights at the two main entrances to the Glen Oaks 8ubdivision~ it is the general
opinion of the residents of Glen Oaks, that both of these intersections are very difficult
to see at night, therefore a dangerous traffic condition exists at both intersections,
I have ~nclo~ed the required streetlight requc:st form and pctH:ion for the internec:tion
of Centralia Rd. &: Glen Oaks Dr and also, the streetlight request form for the intersection
of Chester Rd, & Hamlin Ave. (I did not get a petition signed for this location because
there are no homes located within 200 feet of the intersection)~
sincerely~
T
Lowerence T~ Quigley
.. ~~
~
{ -
j
~
j
....... ....: -
./
f. - ~
00 018.
'. .
e STREETLIGHT REQUEST e
Clover Hill District
REQUEST
RECEIVED: September 17, 1991
ESTIMATE
REQUESTED: January 10, 1992
ESTIMATE
RECEIVED: February 14, 1992
DAYS ESTIMATE
OUTSTANDING: 35
COST TO INSTALL STREETLIGHT: $3647.00
NAME OF REQUESTOR: Fred Little
ADDRESS: 12906 Pecan Terrace, M1dloth1an, VA 23113
PHONE NUMBER: HOME - 744-1950
WORK - 755-5369
o
REQUEST IS LOCATED AT THE INTERSECTION OF
Red Chestnut Court and Red Chestnut Drive, Vicinity of 12915
c==J REQUEST IS NOT AT AN INTERSECTION. REQUESTED LOCATION IS
c==J A POLE ALREADY EXISTS AT THIS LOCATION
POLICY CRITERIA:
INTERSECTION:
VEHICLES PER DAY:
PETITION:
Qualified
Not Qualified, less than 600 VPD
Qualified
..
~....
COMMENTS: Location approved at the January 8, 1992, Board meeting.
Attachments? No
00 018
e STREETLIGHT REQUEST e
-Clover Hill D1st r ict
REQUEST
RECEIVED: September 17, 1991
ESTIMATE
REQUES~ED: January 10, 1992
ESTIMATE
RECEIVED: February 14, 1992
DAYS ESTIMATE
OUTSTANDING: 35
COST TO INSTALL STREETLIGHT: $1714.00
NAME OF REQUESTOR: Fred Little
ADDRESS: 12906 Pecan Terrace, M1dlothian, VA 23113
PHONE NUMBER: HOME - 744-1950
WORK - 755-5369
D
REQUEST IS LOCATED AT THE INTERSECTION OF
o
REQUEST IS NOT AT AN INTERSECTION. REQUESTED LOCATION IS
Red Chestnut Drive, mid-point, vicinity of 12906
D A POLE ALREADY EXISTS AT THIS LOCATION.
POLICY CRITERIA:
INTERSECTION:
VEHICLES PER DAY:
PETITION:
Not Qualified, location not an intersection
Not Qualified, less than 400 VPD
Not Qualified, less than 75% of residents
within 200 feet
COMMENTS: Location approved at the January 8, 1992, Board meeting
Attachments? No
00 020
/'
e
STREETLIGHT REQUEST
e
Matoaca District
REQUEST
RECEIVED: October 18, 1991
ESTIMATE
REQUESTED: NovembeL 20, 1991
ESTIMATE
RECEIVED: February 18, 1992
DAYS ESTIMATE
OUTSTANDING: 90
COST TO INSTALL STREETLIGHT: $2173.00
NAME OF REQUESTOR: Marion Vaughan
ADDRESS: 3512 South Street, Ettrick, VA 23803
PHONE NUMBER: HOME - 526-7118
WORK -
o
REQUEST IS LOCATED AT THE INTERSECTION OF
Sacks Lane and Sasha Court
c==J REQUEST IS NOT AT AN INTERSECTION. REQUESTED LOCATION IS
c==J A POLE ALREADY EXISTS AT THIS LOCATION
POLICY CRITERIA:
INTERSECTION:
VEHICLES PER DAY:
PETITION:
Qualified
Qualified
Qualified
COMMENTS: Location approved at the November 13, 1991, Board meeting.
This installation is Requestor's priority number 1 of 6.
Requestor also states: f1Location is a dark wooded area toward the
blind side of a house that was vandalized and broken in to in 1990.
Trash is often thrown along this area and the car that was involved
in the Ettrick Supermarket robbery was also abandoned in this dark
a rea. II
Attachments? No
00 021
....
e
STREETLIGHT REQUEST
e
Matoaca District
REQUEST
RECEIVED: October 18, 1991
ESTIMATE
REQUESTED: November 20, 1991
ESTIMATE
RECEIVED: February 18, 1992
DAYS ESTIMATE
OUTSTANDING: 90
COST TO INSTALL STREETLIGHT: $2280.00
NAME OF REQUESTOR: Marion Vaughan
ADDRESS: 3512 South Street, Ettr1ck, VA 23803
PHONE NUMBER: HOME - 526-7118
WORK -
c==J REQUEST IS LOCATED AT THE INTERSECTION OF
o
REQUEST IS NOT AT AN INTERSECTION.
Sacks Lane, vicinity of 4306
REQUESTED LOCATION IS
c==J. A POLE ALREADY EXISTS AT THIS LOCATION.
POLICY CRITERIA:
INTERSECTION:
VEHICLES PER DAY:
PETITIONr
Not Qualified, location not an intersection
Not Qualified, less than 400 VPD
Qualified
COMMENTS: Location approved at the November 13, 1991, Board meetlng~
This installation is Requestor's priority number 2 of 6.
Requestor also states: "Location is a dark and wooded area."
Attachments? No
00 022..
e
STREETLIGHT REQUEST
e
't .
Matoaca District
REQUEST
RECEIVED: October 18, 1991
ESTIMATE
REQUESTED: November 20, 1991
ESTIMATE
RECEIVED: February 18, 1992
DAYS ESTIMATE
OUTSTANDING: 90
COST TO INSTALL STREETLIGHT: $2444.00
NAME OF REQUESTOR: Marion Vaughan
ADDRESS: 3512 South Street, Ettrlck, VA 23803
PHONE NUMBER: HOME - 526-7118
WORK -
D
REQUEST IS LOCATED AT THE INTERSECTION OF
o
REQUEST IS NOT AT AN INTERSECTION. REQUESTED LOCATION IS
Sasha Court, vicinity of 20805 and 20807
D A POLE ALREADY EXISTS AT THIS LOCATION.
POLICY CRITERIA:
INTERSECTION:
VEHICLES PER DAY:
PETITION:
Not Qualified, location not an intersection
Not Qualified, less than 400 VPD
Qualified
COMMENTS: Location approved at the November 13, 1991, Board meeting.
This installation is Requestor's priority number 3 of 6.
Attachments? No
00 023
e
STREETLIGHT REQUEST
e
Matoaca District
REQUEST
RECEIVED: October 18, 1991
ESTIMATE
REQUESTED: November 20, 1991
ESTIMATE
RECEIVED: February ~8, 1992
DAYS ESTIMATE
OUTSTANDING: 90
COST TO INSTALL STREETLIGHT: S1865.00
NAME OF REQUESTOR: Marion Vaughan
ADDRESS: 3512 South Street, Ettrick, VA 23803
PHONE NUMBER: HOME - 526-7118
WORK -
D
REQUEST IS LOCATED AT THE INTERSECTION OF
o
REQUEST IS NOT AT AN INTERSECTION 6 REQUESTED LOCATION IS
Sasha Court, vicinity of 20904 in cuI de sac
D A POLE ALREADY EXISTS AT THIS LOCATION.
POLICY CRITERIA:
INTERSECTION:
VEHICLES PER DAY:
PETITION:
Not Qualified, location not an intersection
Not Qualified, less than 400 VPD
Qualified
COMMENTS: Location approved at the November 13, 1991, Board meeting.
This installation is Requestor's priority number 4 of 6.
Requestor also states: "This 1s a dead end circle with no sufficient
light."
Attachments? No
00 024.
.e
STREETLIGHT REQUEST
e
Matoaca District
REQUEST
RECEIVED: October 18, 1991
. ESTIMATE
REQUESTED: November 20, 1991
ESTIMATE
RECEIVED: February 18, 1992
DAYS ESTIMATE
OUTSTANDING: 90
COST TO INSTALL STREETLIGHT: $1766.00
NAME OF REQUESTOR: Marion Vaughan
ADDRESS: 3512 South Street, Ettrick, VA 23803
PHONE NUMBER: HOME - 526-7118
WORK -
c==J REQUEST IS LOCATED AT THE INTERSECTION OF
o
REQUEST IS NOT AT AN INTERSECTION.
Shaker Drive, vicinity of 20812
REQUESTED LOCATION IS
.c==J A POLE ALREADY EXISTS AT THIS LOCATION.
POLICY CRITERIA:
INTERSECTION:
VEHICLES PER DAY:
PETITION:
Not Qualified, location not an intersection
Not Qualified, less than 400 VPD
Qualified
COMMENTS: Location approved at the November 13, 1991, Board meeting.
This installation 1s Requestor's priority number 5 of 69
Requestor also states: IIThls location is very.dark and on a back
street with no 11ght.ll
Attachments? No
00 o 25ij.
{ "Ii.,.
e
STREETLIGHT REQUEST
e
Matoaca District
REQUEST
RECEIVED: October 18, 1991
ESTIMATE
REQUESTED: November 20, 1991
ESTIMATE
RECEIVED: February 18, 1992
DAYS ESTIMATE
OUTSTANDING: 90
COST TO INSTALL STREETLIGHT: $1615.00
NAME OF REQUESTOR: Marion Vaughan
ADDRESS: 3512 South Street, Ettr1ck, VA 23803
PHONE NUMBERr HOME - 526-7118
WORK -
c==J REQUEST IS LOCATED AT THE INTERSECTION OF
o
REQUEST IS NOT AT AN INTERSECTION~
Shaker Drive, vicinity of 20805
REQUESTED LOCATION IS
c==J A POLE ALREADY EXISTS AT THIS LOCATION.
POLICY CRITERIA:
INTERSECTION:
VEHICLES PER DAY:
PETITION:
Not.Qualif1ed, location not an intersection
Not Qualified, less than 400 VPD
Qualified
COMMENTS: Location approved at the November 13, 1991, Board meeting.
This installation 1s Requestor's priority number 6 of 6.
Attachments? No
00 026
~'"
e
e
..... :;
STREETLIGHT REQUEST
Matoaca District
REQUEST
RECEIVED: January 8, 1992
ESTIMATE
REQUESTED: January 10, 1992
ESTIMATE
RECEIVED: February 19, 1992
DAYS ESTIMATE
OUTSTANDING: 40
COST TO INSTALL STREETLIGHT: $199.90
NAME OF REQUESTOR: Whaley Colbert
ADDRESS I Board of Supervisors, Matoaca District
PHONE NUMBER: .HOME-
WORK -
D
REQUEST IS LOCATED AT THE INTERSECTION OF
o
REQUEST IS NOT AT AN INTERSECTION. REQUESTED LOCATION IS
Beechnut Avenue, upgrade existing 7000 lumen streetlight TD43
o A POLE ALREADY EXISTS AT THIS LOCATION.
POLICY CRITERIA:
INTERSECTION:
VEHICLES PER DAY:
PETITION:
Not Required, existing streetlight
Not Required, existing streetlight
Not Required, existing streetlight
COMMENTS:
This request replaces a request for the installation of a streetlight
at 5725 Beechnut Avenue~
Attachments? No
00 027
REQUEST
RECEIVED:
e e
STREETLIGHT REQUEST
Matoaca District
ESTIMATE
January 8, 1992 REQUESTED: January 10, 1992
ESTIMATE
RECEIVED: February 19, 1992
DAYS ESTIMATE
OUTSTANDING: 40
COST TO INSTALL STREETLIGHT: $199.90
NAME OF REQUESTOR: Whaley Colbert
ADDRESS: Board of Supervisors, Matoaca District
PHONE NUMBER: HOME.-
WORK -
o
REQUEST IS LOCATED AT THE INTERSECTION OF
Beechnut Avenue, upgrade existing 7000 lumen streetlight RD50
c==J REQUEST IS NOT AT AN INTERSECTION. REQUESTED LOCATION IS
o A POLE ALREADY EXISTS AT THIS LOCATION
POLICY CRITERIA:
INTERSECTION:
VEHICLES PER DAY:
PETITION:
Not Required, existing streetlight
Not Required, existing streetlight
Not Required, existing streetlight
COMMENTS:
This request replaces a request for the installation of a streetlight
at 5725 Beechnut Avenue.
Attachments? No
00 028
,4 ..
I ~
e
e
...... ....
STREETLIGHT REQUEST
Matoaca District
REQUEST
RECEIVED: January 8, 1992
ESTIMATE
REQUESTED: January 10, 1992
ESTIMATE
RECEIVED: February 19, 1992
DAYS ESTIMATE
OUTSTANDING: 40
COST.TO INSTALL STREETLIGHT: S180.60
NAME OF REQUESTOR: Whaley Colbert
ADDRESS: Board of Supervisors, Matoaca District
PHONE NUMBER: HOME-
WORK -
D
REQUEST IS LOCATED AT THE INTERSECTION OF
o
REQUEST IS NOT AT AN INTERSECTION. REQUESTED LOCATION IS
Beechnut Avenue, upgrade existing 3300 lumen streetlight 8D62
o A POLE ALREADY EXISTS AT THIS LOCATION.
POLICY CRITERIA:
INTERSECTION:
VEHICLES PER DAY:
PETITION:
Not Required, existing streetlight
Not Required, existing streetlight
Not Required, existing streetlight
COMMENTS:
This request replaces a request for the installation of a streetlight
at 5725 Beechnut Avenue.
Attachments? No
00 029
~ ..
......
.
e
....~ ,"
STREETLIGHT REQUEST
Matoaca District
REQUEST
RECEIVED: January 8, 1992
ESTIMATE
REQUESTED: January 10, 1992
ESTIMATE:
RECEIVED: February 19, 1992
DAYS ESTIMATE
OUTSTANDING: 40
COST TO INSTALL STREETLIGHT: S180.60
NAME OF REQUESTOR: Whaley Colbert
ADDRESS: Board of Supervisors, Matoaca District
PHONE NUMBER: HOME-
WORK -
D
REQUEST IS LOCATED AT THE INTERSECTION OF
o
REQUEST IS NOT AT AN INTERSECTION. REQUESTED LOCATION IS
Beechnut Avenue, upgrade existing 3300 lumen streetlight UD23
o A POLE ALREADY EXISTS AT THIS LOCATION.
POLICY CRITERIA:
INTERSECTION:
VEHICLES PER DAY:
PETITION:
Not Required, existing streetlight
Not Required, existing streetlight
Not Required, existing streetlight
COMMENTS:
This request replaces a request for the installation of a streetlight
at 5725 Beechnut Avenue.
Attachments? No
00 030
.;
e
.
Board of Supervisors Agenda Item
Subject: Streetlight Installation Cost Approvals
Date: March lIt 1992
Page 4
BUDGET AND MANAGEMENT COMMENTS:
The cost of installing the requested streetlights in the Bermuda District is $362.
The current balance in the Bermuda District Streetlight Fund is $7 t 164. If the
installations are approved, the remaining balance would be $6,802.
The cost of installing the requested streetlights in the Clover Hill District Is
$5,361. The current balance in the Clover Hill District Streetlight Fund is $8,936.
If the installations are approved, the remaining balance would be $3,575.
The cost ofjnstalling the requested streetlights in the Matoaca DlstrJctis $12f904,
however t the current balance in the Matoaca District Streetlight Fund is $11,238.
Funds are insufficient to install all of the requested streetlights.
~ '}Illes J. V Stegmai r t Director
Budget and Management
B0139.wp 1 /Bos#4
00 031
(p I ;;~ /4
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
MEETING DATE:
March 11, 1992
6.E.I.
ITEM NUMBER ~
SUBJECT:
Approval of requests by the Treasurer and the Clerk of the
circuit Court to participate in the County's Personnel System.
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:. ~ ~
R~ ~ff:cJ ~ ~. ~ ~ J /N~' ~. 0-/
~i;~ ~ 6M~ Jp:.
0l)VV~
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
S6.4 of the County Charter. states: IIEmployees of constitutional
officers ... may participate in the (County's) personnel system at the
discretion of the' board and upon concurrence of the constitutional
off icer. II S2 .1-114 . 5: 1 ee) of. the Code of Virginia provides that
constitutional officers may request that their employees be. included in
the jurisdiction's grievance procedure and personnel system.
Such requests are made when a constitutional officer personally. affirms
his or her des~re to participate in the County's personnel system during
the officer's term of office. Currently, the Commissioner of Revenue,
Sheriff and Commonwealth Attorney's employees are under the County's
Personnel Policies and Procedures. As newly elected Constitutional
Officers, the Treasurer has requested to continue inclusion of his
employees in the County's personnel policies and procedures, and the
Clerk of the circuit Court has requested that employees of her office
come under the County's Personnel POlicies and Procedures for the first
time. Their participation would further the concept of an equitable
uniform personnel system applicable to all county employees. Employees
of constitutional officers who join the Countyls system are covered by
our system dur ing. the term of the const i tutiona 1 off icer . When new
constitutional officers are elected they may affirmatively choose to
join the County system.
PREPARED BY: ~U
Frederick W. Willis, Dir- -or
Human Resource Management
ATTACHMENTS: YES 111
NO 0
SIGNATURE:
~
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
00 032
805-9891
.. lr
e
e
Recommendation: Pursuant to S6.4 of the County Charter, the Board of
Supervisors is requested to authorize the County Administrator to
approve requests from the Treasurer and the Clerk of the circuit Court
to have their employees included in the County's personnel system
conditioned upon their agreement to comply with the County's personnel
system.
In anticipation of this action, the FY93 budget will include funding to
address the fiscal impact of this change.
00 033
e
e
Office of County Treasurer
P. O. Box 70
Chesterfield, VA 23832
(804) 748-1201
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY, VIRGINIA
RICHARD A. CORDLE
COUNTY TREASURER
O. Hancock J. Hondefich
B. Johnson B. Tate
A. WheawUl
DEPUTY TREASURERS
MEMORANDUM
TO: Lane Ramsey I County Administrat r
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT: Request for Inclusion in the County's Human Resources
system
CC : Rick Willis, HRM Director
steve Micas, County Attorney
In accordance with the County Charter and the Code of Virginia, I am
requesting tl1at the employees of my office be subject to the Countyrs human
resource systems. I understand that relevant functions and activities
covered by this request are as follows:
RECRUITMENT AND SELECTION
o Requisitions, advertising, interviewing, selectiol1
EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY
o Affirmative Action Plan
COMPENSATION AND CLASSIFICATION PLAN
o Classify all positions and evaluate under Hay Job Evaluation methodology
o Add to Table of Authorized Positions and Pay Plan
o All salary adjustments under county compensation Program only
o Performance Management and Achievenlent Evaluation Programs as related to
salaries alld administration
o Establishment of new positions ~ reclassification of eXisting positions 1
deletion/abolishment of positions
00 034
01.
.
e
L. Ramsey
Page Two
EMPLOYEE RELATIONS AND DEVELOPMENT
o Policies alld Procedures including Grievance Procedure
o New Employees orientation
o Training and Development Programs
o Tllition Reimbursement
o Benefits
annual leave
sick leave
holidays (12)
medical alld dental (flexible compensation program)
Virginia Retirement System (retirement and life insurance), County
Supplemental Retirelnent
two deferred compensation plans (AETNA, PEBSCO)
disability insurance
other County benefits as approved
HUMAN RESOURCES INFORMATION SYSTEM
o Reporting requirements, Personnel Action Form, deadlines
o New system (includillg payroll)
WRITTEN HUMAN RESOURCE POLICIES AND PROCEDURES
o Administrative Procedures - 200 series
o Personnel Policies and Procedures
o classification and Compensation Plan (published annually)
Under this arrangment, I agree to observe all county policies and
procedures, relevant Federal and state laws, and County ordinances
affecting the management of the employees of this office.
I know that my predecessor requested that ill cases of exception, tIle
Treasurer would be the final arbiter in any controversy which arose. I
also make that same request.
This arrangement between the Treasurer's Office and the county is one that
I believe has been very beneficial. I have found the HRM Department to be
extremely cooperative and always willing to help in any situation I both as
Chief Deputy Treasurer and as Interim Treasurer.. They have proven to be an
excellent resource for guidance and advice and I look forward to cOlltinuing
this relationship..
Thank you for your consideration of this request.
00 03-5
". ..
.
COMMONWEA L TH OF VIRGI NtA
.
JUDY l. WORTHFNGTON
C LERI< OF C I RC UIT COU RT
aIirruit Cllourt of. <nlp~st.erfi.el.b caOU"t~
POST OFFICE BOX 12!!S
CHESTERFIELD. VtRGINrA
23932.012!!!1
\.
MEMORANDUM
'r(j ~
I,aIle B. Ramsey
County Administrator
Judy L. Worthington~~~
Clerk of the Circui~9~it
f'ROM:
DATE :,
January 6, 1992
I~i R..E:
Request for Inclusion in the County's fluman
Resource System
As mentioned to you -in a previous meeting, I am
very much interested in bringing the employees of the
Circuit Court Clerk's Office under the County's
personnel system. My purpose in doing so is to
provide fairness, consistency and protection to all
employees within the office, and to afford Clerk's
Office personnel the same rights and benefits as
other County and Constitutional Officer personnel.
On January 3, 1992 I met with the Director of
Human Resource Management to discuss my intentions
and the process for making a formal request. At that
time, I was also briefed on the relevant functions
and activities relating to such request, a copy
of which is enclosed.
Pursuant to this meeting and in accordance with
Virginia Code Section 2.1-114.5:1(C) and section 6.4
of the County Charter, I am formally requesting that
the employees of the Circuit Court Clerk's Office be
covered by the County's Human Resource System and
that you forward my request to the Board of
Supervisors for approval. If coverage is granted, it
is understood that all County policies and
procedures, relevant Federal and State laws, and
County ordinances affecting the management of my
'00 036
~J . , ..... .~
e
e
Page 2
employees will be observed. It is further understood
that I would be the final arbiter in any controversy
that may arise where a consensus could not be had,
taking into consideration that there may be grounds
for exception at appropriate times, and under
appropriate circumstances.
,.,
,.
\.~'"
I would like to take this opportunity to express
my deepest appreciation to the County's
administration for the assistance and courtesy
extended me since the November election. Such
support has been invaluable both personally and
professionally. I am honored to be a representative
of this County's government and look forward to
working as a team to enhance productivity and service
to the citizens of Chesterfield.
Thank you in advance for your Cooperation and
attention with regard to my request. Please do not
hesitate to contact me should you have questions or
need additional information.
c: Mr. Frederick ,Willis, Jr.
Attachment
.L-
t
j
00 037
~,E.-~~
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
MEETING DATE;
March 11, 1992
6.E.2.
ITEM NUMBER:
SUBJECT:
Allocation of Funds for Recreational Improvements at
Salem Church Elementary School
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
The Board of Supervisors is requested to allocate $2,500 from the
Dale District Three Cent Road Fund to pay for a portion of the
playground equipment installed by the Salem Church Elementary PTA.
BACKGROUND:
Funds are requested to-supplement PTA donations of approximately
$6,000. Older school yard playground equipment was considered
unsafe and was removed. PTA fundraisers for the newly installed
equipment have garnered approximately $6,000, but they are still
short $ 2 , 500 . Mr . Har ry Danie 1 , Board of Superv i sor s , Da le
District, has requested this allocation of funds.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors approve the transfer
of $2,500 from the Dale District Three Cent Road Fund to the Parks
and Recreation Department Playground Account- for playground
improvements at Salem Church Elementary School.
PREPARED BY:
ATTACHMENTS: YES 0
NO II
Rober L. Masden
Depu~. County
Admirlistrator
SIGNATURE:
c/!J(J.
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
00 0 3.8
808-9891
. -~.
.
.
~' ~...
...,. ;'.JII-
Board of Supervisors Agenda Item
Subject: Allocation of Funds for Recreational Improvemenb3 at Salem Church
Elementary School
Date: March 11, 1992
Page 2
BUDGET AND MANAGEMENT COMMENTS:
The Dale District Three Cent Road Fund has a current balance of $23,642. A
transfer of $2,500 to the Parks and Recreation Department will leave a balance of
$21,142 in the Dale District Three Cent Road Fund.
UUPM 9c;;147rc
JaInes J. L.fSu3gmaier, Dir r
@u'Ciget and'Management
BO 138. wp J/Bos#4
00 039
~ "f"]
...... ~....
808-9891
& .E.S\
t
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
MEETING DATE:
March II, 1992
6.E.3.
ITEM NUMBER;
Set public hearing for April 8, 1992 to consider
SUBJECT: changing wholesale business license tax: from a rate of
$ .10/$100 on all purchases to a rate of $ .10/$100 on
first $55,000,000 of purchases and $.05/$100 on all
purchases over $55,000,000.
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR- S COMMENTS:
R~d /}~ 8 tCTL ~ ~
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
BACKGROUND
Chesterfield County currently has a wholesale merchant business
1 icense tax of $ . 10/ $100 on gross purchases. The Department of
Economic Development's recent experience with large volume
wholesalers considering the Richmond area as a possible business
location has s~own that this tax rate makes us noncompetitive with
many Virginia. localities. Most localities have either a reduced
rate or a sliding scale so that as purchases increase the rate
decreases. By making Chesterf ield' s rate more competitive the
County greatly improves its chances of attracting large wholesalers
who build large facilities, make large real estate investments and
contribute significantly to the County by providing jobs and
payroll and by paying real estate and wholesale merchant taxes.
(see attachment of tax rates in other Virginia localities.)
PREPARED BY:
4;e.o/k
Gary R. McLaren
Director of Economic
Development
ATTACHMENTS: YES g/ NO C
SIGNAl URE :
~
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
00
v
I
.
.~
tio.
Agenda Item
March 11, 1992
Page 2
RECOMMENDATION
staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors set a public hearing
to consider changing Chesterfield County's wholesale merchant
business license to a rate of $.10/$100 on the first $55,000,000 of
purchases and $.05/$100 on all purchases in excess of $55,000,000.
This rate would not reduce. current revenues from this business
license category.
AGI2F78/bgt
BUDGET AND MANAGEMENT COMMENTS:
Based on 1990 information (for 1991 business licenses), one wholesaler reported gross
purchases slightly above $55 million. The impact of this proposed change on business
license revenue would be to decrease revenue by approximately $500.
00 041
BO 140. wp l/Bos #4
t..... .11 r..... !~:.~ "=" ...........,.. . -;j,."..tj,.... ... .~....~, .-............
.
.
AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE CODE OF THE COUNTY
OF CHESTERFIELD, 1978, AS AMENDED, BY AMENDING
AND REENACTING SECTION 12-128 RELATING TO BUSINESS
L I CENS E TAX ON WHOLESALE MERCHANTS
BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield
County:
(1) That Section
Chesterfield, 1978, as
read as follows:
12-128 of the Code of the County
amended, is amended and reenacted
of
to
Sec. 12-128.
Amount of tax.
For every license issued to a person engaged in business
of a wholesale merchant the amount of license tax to be paid
therefor shall be equal to twenty-five dollars ($25.00) on the
amount of purchases up to twenty- five thousand dollars
($25, 000 .. 00) throughout the preceding calendar year..L.. afid ten
cents ($O.10) on everyone hundred dollars ($100.00) of the
amount of purchases greater than twenty- five thousand dollars
($25 . 000 . 00) up to fifty- five million dollars ($55 ,000 .000 . 00)
throughout the preceding cal endar year and five cent s ( SO. 05)
on everyone hundred dollars ($100.00) of the amount of
purchases over fifty- five million dollars ($55 .000. 000 .. 00)
throughout the preceding calendar year.
0403:296.1
1
o 0 04.2
r c.o-" 'i - vc. l1Ul"i 1 U ' Co (
~
uc. r 1 ur C.vUi't. u c. v CL.Ur 1JI:.1'i 1
rnl\ llV. UUI1-Jf1UIO;;
r. UC
.
e
;
r,femorandurn
To:
From:
Dale:
Subject;
Research Staff. Research file UTaxes: Business License Tuft
10 Ann M. Draughn '--~ ..._~..[....
December 24_ 1991 -./
Business License Tax in Virginia. s Counties and Cities for the calendM Y Cc:1f 1991 or tax
year 1991 ~92
ThtPORT~NT NOTE:
If there are questions as to how an individual company will be clnssified and taxed regarding a
business license taX. the recornmendation of the De~ent of Economic Development (as advised
by the Virr.. in ia Department of T ax ntio n) is th~ll lhe company should con tact the conlm issioncr of
the revenue of lhe locaIHy(ies) in question ~nd obt:iin in writing how the company would be l.axed~
Counties. cilles. and lO~lns may impose loe.al license taxe~ on busines~es. Lr:ldes; professions. occupations. and callings. h10st business
license taxes arc based on "gross rcceipls." Un(ortunately. lhe definition of lhis concept is not provided in the license taX section of
lhe Codt of Virgi nia. and the Dcpartmcnl of Taxation has nol issued an advisory opinion on Lhe definition. Whotes:llers license fAxes
are usually based on gross purchases. No definition is provided for this concept either. The taXing systems used by localities vary.
Some localities mx businesses at :l set rare per S 100 of gross teceiptsot regardless of the vot umc of receipts.. Olh ers apply schedules
whiCh use different ratcs- depending on the volume of receiptS. Many localities apply minimum and maximum va.lues.. Still others
impose flat fees regardless of lhe volume of receipts or the type of business. .
A license tdX on merchanLS~ gross receipts or purchases is in lieu of a merch3ntsf capital L."\X. Thust a locality may impose one or the
olhcr. or, neither of the two. For the rox ye.ar 1991.92, 36 or the 9S counties and aU 41 cities imposed a business license tax.. Sit.
localities impose neither me business license nor lhe nlcrch:mlS t capit3.l {ax (the counties of Accomack. Bath. Halifax. Nclson(except
ConLrnC10f!), R~ppahannock, ilIld Washirlglon).. Sonle localities L.1X some classifications of businesses while not taxing other
c'assifical::ons. For example. Prince George Coun[y does not impose 'a business licen3C tax on wholesalers and disLributors~ The
localiues imposing a business license tax tend to be located in lhr~ geographic areas of the state: northern Virgi1\i~ central
Shenandoah Valley, and the southC3$tem section of the state encompassing the Richmond metropolitan area and extending southeast
t hrou g h the Ti d ev."a te r region..
The 1978 Yirsinia General Assem bly require.d the Virginia Depmment of Taxation to promulgate guidelines defining and explaining
the calegories of enterprises for the use of local governments in adminislering this taX. The resulting publicalion. .'GuidelinesK ~ was
upcbtcd last in July 1983. '
The 1991 DED t:.tx questionnaire requested information on five business ClrlSsifications. The classifications. their respective definitlon
from t-Guidelines". and their rate limitation as listed in th~ Code of Virginia are described below. Note that there is often IIno rate
provided" for some of lhe categories in some localities~ This may be due to several reasons, mOSt notably~ 1l13t the locality has not
encounlered this type of business [0 date. Clarifications for these categories in the localities will have to be. oblnined by caning the
conlnlissioner of the r~vcnue.
Some localiLies have J.at. rates that exceed the imposed tale limits. This is due to a granafather clause in the Code which permits
localities to maintain. under ceruin conditions. tax rales exceeding the rate limimtions established January 1. 1978~
Retailer:
Any person ~'ho makes sales of goods, wares. and merchandise for any purpose other tl1:m resale. but not including
SJ.1es III ""rholesale to instilutionaL commercial, and indusuial1J.Sers~ The. ra~e limitation is 62015100 gross receiDts~
M.ail Order:
No specific guideline-s are provided in "GuideliJles',~. LocaJities often tax the business at the mte for retailers or (Ot
who 1 esaJers d epe ndi n g on the n1 ail order bu s i ness.
Who I esaJ er::
Any person who sells to others for resale or 'ft.ho sells at \\'holes.o.l~ [0 institutionaL commercial. or industrial users.
.tGuidelines" proposes lhat "\\'holes.aler" is not susceptible lO a general definiLion which wilI cover all possible
siluatiQns~ The detennination of individual questions will depend upon the particulJr facts of the case.. The Tax
Comnlissioncr has lhe aU1horiry [0 issue an advisory opinion in spCt:ific cases. The rale limitation is .05/S 100 gross
purchJ ses ~
1
00 043
FEB-24-92 MON 10:28
DC:PT Ur i:CUN UcVJ:LUr'Mi:.NT
e
rAX NUt ~U4J(1~leo
.e
r'~ U:i
Fi n31\C iaJ S ervic es:
The rale limi~tion is .58/5100 gross receiptg~
B u si ne ss S erv ie es:
Any service rendered for compensation to any business. trade. OCCup:tlion. or government.:1.l agency. The rmt
lim itarion is .36/5100 gross receipts~
A license tax may not be levied on a manufacturer Cor the privilege of manufacturing and selling goods. wares. and merchandise :u
v.'holcsale at the pL'1ce of m:mu facture.
2
00 044
rc~-~q-~~ MUN lU:c~
County
UJ:PT Ur t.L;UN Ul:VELOPMJ::Nl
e
rAX NU. ~Uqj(lel~o
e
P. 04
Business License Tax in Virginia's Counties and Cities
(Calendar Y till 1991 or Tax Yc.3I 1991..92)
Type of
B usi ness
Accomack
Tax R~te per 5100 of Gross Receipts
.A.I bem arl e
All,eghany
A.melia
P.tn h erst
(businesses nor
subj eet lO a
merCM,nlS'
capital taX)
Appoma1tox
Atl in g ton
Augusta
re wI ers
m ai I order r lIITlS
who 1 esal ers an d di SU' i b U 1 or s
financial sCMces
bu sine ss s erY ic es
re tail ers
mail ord er finl\ S
wholCs.1lcrs and d istribulors
fin anci al se rvices
business services
retailers .,
mail order n.rms
\irtholesalers and disui butors
fi n anci al serv ices
busi n ess serv ic es
re w..i I crs
m ell order firms
who les.a 1 ers an d distributors
fina.."lcial services
bus i n ess s eN ic c.s
re uil ers
mi1il order finns
~~holes.:ller sand d i Sln bu to rs
fin:mci31 services
business services
re tai I ers
m ai 1 order fimls
who I es:llers and d i sui butots
financi al services
business servic es
retail ers
mail order firms
\\'holesa]ers and distributors
financial sen'ices
b usi n ess scIv ic e...~
retailers
mail order !inns
wholcs.:llers and dislributors
fi nanci at services
busi n ess servic es
none
none
none
none
nonc
~20
.20
~05 gross purchases
.58
.36
greater of S 15 or .1 OIS 1 00
gr~[er of S 15 or J 0/51 00
. OS gross purchases
greater of S 15 or t29/S 100
gre3ler of S 15 or .18/$ 100
~05
.OS
.05
.15
.09
nO rate provided
.31
no rnle provided
~50
.31
none
none
none
none
none
.20
.20 (rct1.il)
.08
.58
.35 (.36 for some specialized services including software progmrnming
or travel agencies)
~20
.25
.05
.25
.20
3
00 O~5
FEB-24-92 MON 10:29
DEPT OF ECON DEVELOPMENT
e
FAX NO. 8043718185
e
Business LIcense Tax In Virginia's Counties and Cities (coord)
(Calendar Year 1991 or Tax Ye41 1991-92)
County
Type of
B usi ncss
Tax R3tC per SlOO of Gross Receipts
P. 05
Bath
rc l3 il ers
mail order flIn1S
wholesalers and disttibutors
fi n:me i ~ SCIV ic es
business s erv ic es
BedIord
rC' t.:l il ~ rs
m Ji 1 order r Jftt'\S
t,\...holes:llers and d i slri b ul OfS
fin3Ilcial seIVices
business services
B ~ and
re tail ers
mail order rums
\I/holesalers and dislIibutors
financial services
bus in ess services
BOle tourt
re Lail ers
mail order firms
whole~1ers and di suic.urors
financial services
bus i n ess seevie es
Bruns\viclc
retailers
mail order flfIllS
,^'holes.alers and di strihulors
fi n ancial set\; c es
business services
Buch3n~
rera.ilers
mail order fun\s
who l e:).'1Jers an d di sui but ors
financi al services
bus i ness serv ices
Buckingham
reta it ers
mail order fmns
wholesalers :md distribulors
fi n ancia! se rvi c es
busjness services
Campbell
re tail ers
mail ord er fi nns
v.~hole~lets and distributors
fln:mciaJ services
business services
none
none
none
none
none
none
none
non~
none
none
none
none
none
none
none
.10
no rate provided
~05 gross purchases
no tale provided
..18
none
none
none
none
none
none
none
none
none ..
none
none
none
none
none
none
none
none
none
none
none
4
00 046
e
.
BusIness License Tax In VirginIa's Counties and Cities (confd)
(Calendar Yeu 1991 or Ta:r. Year 1991-92)
County
Type or
Business
Tax. Rate per Sl00 of GrosS Receipts
Caroline
retailers
m ai) order ft.rrns
whol~C\.31ers and distri butors
fi n nnci a.I services
business services
Carroll
retailers
mail ord er fim\s
wholt$.31ers and distributors
fin:mcial services
business services
Charles Cit):
retaiJers
m ail order r tl'TT'\S
y,.' ho 1 es:tJers an d di s tributors
financi al services
business. services
Charlone
re tail erS
mail order [ums
who) esa lers and distributors
fi nanc i a1 servi c es
business sen"ices
C hcs le rfi e 1 d
retailers
mail order firms
wh 01 esalers an d di sui bu t or s
financial s.:rvices
business services
C I ark e
re tail ers
m.1i1 order rums
wholesalers and disuiburors
financial seNic~s
busin ess serv ic es
Craig
re tail ers
mail order firms
\l.lhole~lers and distributors
financi al serv ic es
bu si n ess services
Culpeper
retailers
mail ard er firm s
Yt'hol esalcrs and distributors
fin:.lnciaJ services,
bus i ness services
lIS
no rate ptovided
.05
p49
.29
none
none
none
none
none
none
none
none
none
none
none
none
none
none
none
~20
.20
~ 10 gross purchases
~58
~36
$25 fee
S25 fee
S 25 fee
S25 fee
525 fee
none
none
none
none
none
none
none
none
none
none
5
00 047
FEB-24-92 MON 10:30
DEPT~ ECON DEVELOPMENT
FAX NO. 80~18185
Business LIcense Tax In Virginia's Counties and CIties (confd)
(CaJendar Year 1991 or Tax Year 1991.9:2)
County
Type of
Business
Tax Rate per $100 of Gross Receipt')
P. 07
Cumberland
retaUers
mail order rums
",~holeSJlers and distri butors
nnlIlcial services
bu si ne$S serv ic es
Dickenson
re tai i ers
m nil order firms
who lesalers an d disci b u tors
financial services
busines.s services
Dinwiddie
re tail ers
mail order fums
Vi holcsalers and disoi bulOrs
flnancjal services
business seI'"\>ices
Esse.x
re tail ers
m ail order finns
wholesalers &nd disaibucors
fi n anci:tl services
bus i ness s erv ic es
Fairfnx
re 1.3 il ers
m ail ord er fim\s
wholesalers and disLributurs
financ.ial services
busi ness serv ices
Fauq uie.r
retailers
mail order firms
wholes.alers and disuibutors
fin;:mcial services
b u si ness sen: ices
Flo)rd
retailers
m ail order fi nns
\l;i he 1 es.ale rs and di stri b ulors
financial services
business services
Fluvanna
reLa ilers
m ail order firm s
wholes~Jers and distributors
finnnci a1 servic es
business services
.05
.05
.05
.05
.05
none
none
none
non~
none
grea ler of 525 or ~ 16/S 1 00
grC3ler of $25 or .301S 100
greater of $25 or .051S 100
greater of 525 or ~451S 100
greater of $25 or .301S 100
none
none
none
none
none
.17
.17
.04 gro ss pure h ases
.16
.20
520 + ~ 101$ 100 on excess over $10.000
$20 + ..10/$100 on excess over S10JX)O
.05 gross purcha..~es
520 + .30/5100 on excess over S3.5oo
$20 + .20/S 100 on excess over $6,000
none
none
none
none
none
none
none
none
none
none
6
00 048
e
'e
BusIness License Tax in Virginia's CountIes and Cities (conc'd)
(Cal~nd:u Ye.ar 1991 or Tu YC3r 1991-92)
Count)'
Type of
Business
F iJ.okl in
Tax Rate per S 100 of Gross Receipts
reta.ilers
mail order firms
wholes~Jers and distTibutor~
financial services
bus in ess s~ ic es
Frederick
retailers
m J.i 1 order fi rms
whOies:lle:rs and disa-ibutors
fi n3ncial se rvices
business services
Giles
retailers
m ail order fimls
whol c.S:l.lers and distribu[ors
financial sc rvices
business se tv ic es
G 1 Qure stet
retailers
m ail order finns
"".holesalers and distri bUIors
fin anci aJ servi c es
business se.rv ic es
Goochland
re tail ers
m:li 1 order fImls
who 1 eSJI ers and di s 1ri butors
financi 31 se rvi c es
business services
Grayson
re tail ers
m ail order firms
'.Jholesalers atJ d distribulors
fi nan c ial servi c es
bus i ness serv ic es
Greene
retailers
mail order rums
wholesalers and disuibutors
financial se f\rjces
business serv ices
Greensville
re~ilers
mail order firms
whole~lers and dist.ri~utOfS
fin~ci al services
business services
none
non~
none
none
none
.20
.20
.05 gross purch~es
~58
.36
none.
none
none
none
none
gr~lcr of S30 or .10/S100 on lhe fltst $200J)OO + ~20/S100 on excess
greater of 53Q or .1 OIS 100 on the first S200 lJOO + .20/S 1 00 on exces-~
grea ter of 530 or .05/S 100 gross purchases
grealer of $30 or ~12/S 100
greater of 530 or ~ lOIS 100
grea leT of $25 or .101S 100 on [he first S25..ooo 1'" .05/$ 1. 00 on excess
g~ter of $25 or .10IS 100 on the rust S25~OOO + .05/S100 on c:<;cc.ss
greater or $25 or ..025/$100 gross purch~ses
gr~ter of 525 or .101S100 on the first S25,CXXJ + .15/$ 100 on excess
grc:ller of 525 or .1 OJS 100
none
none
none
none
none
.15
.27
.04 gross purchases
.44
.27
~ 16
.16
~ 05 gross purchases
.50
.40
7
00 049
r C.D-CY-~C nUl't J U I j 1
Utrl ur tvUN UtVhLUrntNl
1", U~
e
rH^ nUl OUqj{101~~
e
BusIness License Tax In virginlats Counties and Cities (coned)
(Calendar Year 1991 or Tax YeM 1991-92)
County
Type of
Business
Halifax
Tax Ra\e per S 1 00 of Gross Recei pLS
re uilers
m ai \ 0 rdcr firms
\\'holes.11crs and distributors
fi n an c ial servi c es
bus i n ess s erv ~c es
H anov er
re L:lil ers
nlail order finns
wh 0 I eSe'll ~rs an Ll d j str i b ut ors
fi nJn C i al services
business services
Henrico
re 14.'.1 ers
mai 1 order fl.ffi1s
"W'holes.Alers and disuibutors
financial services
business serv ic es
Henry
re la i1 ers
m ail order fi nn s
whole.~lers and disuibutors
finane i a1 servi c es
b usi n ess serv ic es
Highland
reUlners
m:ul order finn s
wholesalers and distributors
fi n anci al services
business services
Isle of Wight
re tail ers
mail order rums
'~..holesa1ers and distributors
finane iaI services
b usi ness services
James City
retailers
mail order finns
\\~ho 1 C~ lers and d i sui b ut ors
fi n anci 3.1 servi ces
business services
King and Queen
retailers
mail order firms
wholesalers and dislribulOrs
11 nanci al services
business services
none
none
none
none
none
none.
none
none
none
none
.20.
.20
S25 on the rust S 10.000 or gross purchases + .20fS 100 on excess up lO
55 m il~ + .17/5100 on the next 5S mil. + ~151S 100 the nex.t 520 mil. +
~05/S 100 on excess over 530 miL
,36
.20
S lOon the first S 5.(XX) + J 5/S 100 on excess
S lOon th~ fitsl $3~OOO + ,,15/$100 on excess
.05 gross purch:lseS
$10 on lhe first S2tCOO + .25/S 100 on excess
S lOon the first S3,000 + ..ISIS 100 on excess
none
none
none
none
none
~ 12
no t3te pray ide d
~os gross purchases
.36
.20
..10
.20
.05 geo 5S purchases
~58
~36
none
none
none
none
none
8
00 0'50.
FEB-24-92 MON .10:31
DE?T OF ECON DEVELOpMENT
e
FAX NO. 8043718185
e
County
Business LIcense Tax In Virginia's Counties and Cities (coned)
(Cal~ndM Ye3C 1991 or Tax Year 1991.92)
Type of
Business
Tax Rale per $100 of Gross Receipts
P t 10
King George
King \\'illiam
Lancaster'
Lee
Loudoun
Lo u i sa
Lunenburg
Madison
reuilers
mail 0 rdcr f1.rnlS
~~holesaters nnd distributors
finnncial services
business services
retailers
mail order firms
wholes:llers and di.snibulors
fin aIle ial servie e.,
b u si nes! set\' ices
retailers
mail order fums
\vholes::alers and d:stributors
fi nanc iaJ servic es
business services
retailers
rn a.i J order f u1rlS
\'/hote5:llers and dislributors
fin:lnciol servi c es
busin ess servic es
re tail ers
mail order ftrms
'Jl,' ho 1 cul e rs and 6i S tri b U lOrs
financial senices
business services
re tail ets
mail order firms
-N ho I esalers and di s tri bu tors
fi n JIlci at servic e.s
business servicts
retailers
mail order firms
y.'hotesaJers 8t'1d distributors
fi nanc.i 31 sc:rvic es
business services
re tail er s
mail ordc r firm s
wholesalers and distrihuI0CS
financial services
bu s iness scrv ices
gr~lter of $25 or .10/$ 100
grc:H er of S 25 or .1 01S ) 00
gre:1ICr of S25 or .05/$100 of gross PUrch3ses
grc~ller of 525 or .101S 100
gre.1 ter of $15 or ,1015 100
none
none
none
none
non~
none
none
none
none
none
none
none
none
none
none
$10 on the first S 50t.OOO + ~ 1 O/S 100 on excess
S 10 on the first 550,000 T .10/S 100 on excess
S 10 + ~05/S 100 of gross pun:h3.Ses
$10 on the first S 10.000 + .33/$100 on excess
S lOon the first S 1 0 ~OOQ + ..16/S 100 on excess
none
none
none
none
none
none
none
none
none
none
none
none
none
none
none
9
00 051
FEB-24-92 MON 10:32
DEPT OF ECON DEVELOpMENT
e
FAX NO. 8043718185
e
County
Business License Tax In VIrginia's Counties and Cities (cont'd)
(CaJ~ndar Year 1991 or Tax Y ~ ill' 1991-92)
Type of
Business
Tax Rate per $100 of Gross Receipts
P. 11
Malhe \\'S
1\ tee k1 en bur g
Middlesex
h1ontgomery
Nelson
New Kent
NonhJmp~on
Northumberland
re tail er s
mail order fim\s
wholesalers and dislribulors
financial services
business services
re 1O i1 ers
m oj 1 order f urns
wholesaJers and distributors
fi n:me i aJ seM c es
business services
re tai 1 ers
mail order fums
whole$~lers and distributors
fin anci al s ervic es
b u si ness serv ic es
re taU erg
m ail order firm s
whole~lers and distributors
fin an c i aJ s.ervi ces
business services
re tail ers
mail ord er finn s
\vholesaters and di~tributo!"S
fi nunc i aJ scrvi ces
bus iness s erv ic es
rebilers
mail order finns
\vholcsale.TS and distribulurs
fi nancial services
business services
re tail ers
m aJ] order firms
who I es.n.lcrs and dis rri but or s
fin:mcial services
bus i n ess serv ices
retnil crs
m ail or dOor finn s
wholesalers and distributors
fi nanciill servi ces
business services
.10
.10
S10
.10
~ 10
none
none
none
none
none
none
none
none
none
none
none
none
none
none
none
none
none
none
none
none
~20
~20
~05 gro 5S pun:hascs
.58
.36
none
none
none
none
none
none
none
none
none
none
10
00 05.2
FEB-24-92 MON 10:33
County
DEPT OF ECON DEVELOPMENT
e
FAX NO. 8043718185
e
Business License Tax in VirgInia's Counties and Cities (cant'd)
(Ca.! endar Ye..:'\t 1991 or Tax Y car 1991-92)
Type of
Business
Tax Rate per 5100 of Gross Receipts
P. 12
NOltow3y
(businesses not
subjcct to a
mere hln 1$.
capit.:1l tax)
Orange
- Page-
Pauick
Pi llSy 1 vania
powhatan
Prince Edward
Pri nee. G cor 8 e
re U1 i I ers
nl ail order firms
who1 csa leTS and distribu tors
financial services
business services
rctaile~
mail 0 rder firms
\\.'. ho] es.:ll ers and di s Lxi b u (OfS
fi n anc i a1 servi c es
business s erv ices
retailers -
mail order rums
Vi ho I esa 1 ers and d.i 5 tri b u to rs
fi n an cia! services
bus in ess servic es
re tail ers
mail 0 rder firm s
wholes:llers and distriburors
fi n :lnci at services
business services
re t.ai.1 ers
mail order finns
who 1 es 31ers and disrri but 0 rs
fi n:lIlciaJ services
b usi ness serv ; ces
retailers
mail order fums
\\~holes3Jers and distributors
financi al services
bu siness services
re~"1.i 1 ers
m nil order fi nns
who I es.a 1 ers an d di s tri bUlors
financial services
bus ioess serv ic es
re.13 i I ers
mJil order firms
who] cS:llers nnd distributors
fi n anci a1 ser\" ices
busi n ess s erv ices
greater of S 15 or .OSIS 100
.05 (rc.uil) or ~O 15 (\\rhole~le)
.015
.IS
.09
none
none
none
none
none
none.
none
none
none
none
none
none
none
none
none
none
none
none
none
none
S30 fee
S 3 0 fee
$30 fee
530 fee
S 30 fee
none
none
none
none
none
.15
.15
none
.15
.20
11
00 053
FEB-24-92 MON -10:33
DEPT OF ECON DEVELOpMENT
e
FAX NO. 8043718185
.e
Counry
Business License Tax in virginia's Counties and Cities (cont'd)
(Cat endat Year 1991 ot Tax Y e~ 1991-92)
Type of
Bus ioess
Tax Rate per S 100 of Gross Re.ceiplS
P. 13
Prince William
Pula.<:ki
Rappahannock
Richmond
Roanoke
Rockbridge
R ockin g ham
Russell
rc tailers
mail order fl.nns
wholesalers nnd distribulors
fi n:mc i Jl servi ces
bus i n e ss serv ices
rc t.3 it ers
m a.i I ora er finns
wholesalers and distribu[ors
fi n:mci:1.l services
bus incss serv ic es
re tailers
mail order f1l1115
wholesalers and disaibutors
financial services
business services
relaiie~
01 ail ord er firms
who lesale rs an d d j s ai bu tors
fi nan ci a1 servi c e.s
busiDess services
re tail ers
n1 ail order finn s
~.holcs:J.lers and distributors
fi nancial services
business sef'{ ices
retailers
mail order finns
,,,holes.alers and distributors
fi nanci al servi ces
b usi ness serv ic ~s
re t.3ilcrs
mail order firm s
wholeS3]crs and distributors
financi al see\' ic es
bus iness s erv ic es
re miters
mail order firms
wholesalers and distributors
financial services
b usi ness serv ices
.17
..17
.05 gross pure h ases
.33
~21
none
none
none
none
none
none
none
none
none
none
none
none
none
none
none
~20
.20
.OS gross purch:lses
650
.3A
~ 13
.13
~05 gross purchases
.23
.23
none
none
none
none
none
none
none
none
none
none
12
00 054
FEB-24-92 MON 10:34
DEPT OF ECON DEVELoPMENT
e
FAX NO. 8043718185
e
CountY
Business License Tax In VirginIa's CountIes and Cities (confd)
(Calendar Year 1991 or Tax Ye,ar 1991...92)
Type of
Business
Seolt
Tax R:lte per $100 of Gross Receipts
Shcnmduah
Smyth
SOUlhampton
S pOiSylvani a
Sr~rord
s urry
Sussex
rc lailers
m:tU order ft.rms
who 1 esal e rs and di s tri hur ors
linJIlciaJ services
business services
relailers
mail order firms
Vi ho 1 es.11ers and d is tri but ors
financial services
business services
ret:l il ers
mail order !inns
wholesalers and disaibulors
fin ancial servi c es
busi n ess s erv ic es
reta il c rs
n1 nil order f 1Ill\S
\vholes..11ers and di:ioibulors
fi n anc i al serv j c es
busi ness serv ic es
retailers
mail order finns
wh oles.olers and di 5lributors
financi a.l scr.ic es
business services
retailers
mail order fums
~N ho leSJ.lers and di sttib u tors
finsn cia} servic es
busi ness serv ices
remit ~rs
m ail order firms
who] esalers and distrib utors
fi nmlC iaJ servic es
bus iness serv ic es
reUlilers
mail order firms
wholculers and dis[fibulors
fin ancinl scrvi c es
bu si ness set\f ices
none
none
none
none
none
none
none
none
none
none
none
none
none
none
none
none
none
none
gr~ter of $25 or ~58J$1 00
gre.alcr of 520 or ~251S 100
$30 on the fi.rst $50.000 -+ .10/S 100 on excess
$30 on the rllst 550.000 + .10/5100 on excess
greater of 530 or ~0251S 100 gross purch3ses
S3Q on the rU,Sl 550,000 ~ .29/S 100 on exce~s
$30 on the rust $50,000 + .10/5100 on excess
none
none
none
none
none
$25 on lhe first $1.C()() + .15/S 100 on excess
525 on the first S 1.000 + ..15/$100 on exce~s
.05 gross purchases
$50
530 on Ule first $20.000 ..... ..15/S 100 on excess
none
none
none
none
none
13
P, 14
00 055
1- ~[J - c..,.. ve. l1Ul'L J U I .JY
Ul:.r 1 ur c.vun UC.VCLUfl1C.1'1.1
r. 1 ~
e
rn^ l'tu. OU~.J r i01U;J
e
Business License Tax in Vlrginiats Counties and Cities (conrd)
(Calendar Year 1991 or Tax Year 1991-92)
County
Type of
Business
Taze \Ir'ell
Tax Rate per $100 of Gross Receipts
r~lail ers
mail order flIlns
wholesalers and distributors
fi n anci::tl scrvic es
bus i n ess scrv ices
Warren
reL'lilcrs
mail order finns
", ho I es.11 e TS an d d isu-i b u [ors
fi n:ln C i31 servi ces
bus i ness serv ic es
Washington
retailers
mail ord er firm s
wholesalers and distributors
financial services
business servic es
Weslmoreland
re ta i] ers
mail order finns
wholc&11ers and distributors
financial services
bus iness seJ'1 ic es
Wise
re tailers
mail order fmns
whoJesalers and distribulors
fin:mcial services
busi ncss services
Wy(he
re tail ers
mai 1 order firm s
wholcS31c.rs and diSlributors
financim sef"\ices
business scrvic es
York
retailers
mail order firms
wholeS3lers and dislIibutors
financi:l1 services
bus iness s erv ic es
City
Alexandria
re Lailers
m a.i 1 order fi nns
who 1 esa)ers and d i S o-i bul ors
fi n anci al servic es
bu si ness services
none
none
none
nune
none
.12
.12
.03 gross p u rch 3Sc.s
~3S
.22
none
none
none
none
none
none
none
none
none
none
none
none
none
none
none
none
none
none
none
none
.20
.20
.05 gross p ute h ases
A58
.36
greater of $30 or ..201S 100
greJter of 530 or ~201S 100
greater of 530 or .05/$ 1 00
greater or $~O or .S8/S 100
grc.arer of 530 or .35/$100
14
00 056
r c.o- c:. Lf -;:'C llUn 1 U · ~O
City
u c. r 1 ur c.vVl'1 Uc. V .c. LVI l1L.l\ [
e
r n/\ n u. u u ~ oJ r 1 U 1 U ~
[. Uc.
e
Business License Tax in Virginia's Counties and Cities (cool'd)
(Calt;ndar Year 1990 or Tax Year 1990-91)
Type o(
Business
Tax Rate per $100 of Gross Receipts
Bedford
Bristol
Buena Vista
Ch:ulouesville
Chesapeake
Clifton Forge
ColoniaJ Heights
relailers
mail order firms
"lho)es;l}ers and disuibulors
fi n nnc ial servic es
busi ncss servic es
retailers
m ail order firms
Vtrholesalers and distributors
fi n ancial geM ces
business s ery ices
remilers
mail order firms
whole~lers and distributors
fi nanc i n1 servi ces
b u si ness servic es
rc t:lilers
mail order rums
\\'holesalers and distributors
fi n 3n ci a1 services
business services
re t.:lil er S
mail order rums
wholesalers and distributors
financial services
business services
retailers
mID 1 order firrt'ls
wholesalers and d istribulors
financi a1 serv ices
business services
re t3i 1 ers
mail order finns
\\~holcs.a}ers and dislribulors
fin:l11 ci al servic es
business services
S lOon the first S 8 ~CXXl + ~ 12515100 on excess
S 10 on lhe ft.rSl $4,000 + ~251S 100 on excess
S25 + ..10/S 100 gross purchases
$25 on the first $5.000 + .50/S 100 on ej(cess
510 on the first S4 ,C()() + ~2SIS 100 on ex cess
gr~ter of S30 or 20/S 100
gr~1tcr of $30 or ~201S 100
$25 + ..25/S100 on the flfst S500~OOO gross purchases + ~20/S100 on the
next S500.000 + .1515100 on the nex.t 51 mil. + .10/5100 on excess over
$2 mil.
~20
great er of $30 or .20/S 100 -
gre.a tef of S30 or .20/S 100
retailers taXed ~t retail rate on gross receipts, ",.holesalcrs at wholes31crs
rate on gross purchas cs.
$30 on the first S30_ooo gross purchases + ~201S 100 on excess
gr~ter of 530 or .58/S 100
greater of 530 or .36/$ 100
525 on first S2..ooo + .2.01S 100 on excess
$ 25 on fir st 52 J)OO + ~2QIS 100 on ex cess
S50 of fust S 10,000 gross purchases + .25/S 100 on next $40~OOO ..,.
.16/5100 on ex.c ess over S 50 1000
grealer of 530 or .36/S 100
greater of 530 or ..36/S 100
gr~ter of 530 or ..201S 100
gre.a ter of 530 or .20/S 100
S50 on first S 1 O~OOO gross purchases -to ..12;'$100 on excess
depend in g on lype~ license taX of S 30 or .58/S 100 on lhe flJ'SI S 1 miL ~
~ 12/5 100 on excess
~36 .on the flIst SSOOJ)(X) + JOIS 100 on excess
.20
none
625
~58
.36
.15
no rote provid cd
$20 on first $1 0 ~OOO gross purch3Ses + .11!$ 100 on the nex.t 5240.000
+ ..03/S 100 on excess over $250~OOO
~S7
.25
15
00 057
rc~-c4-~~ nUN lU:~tl
Ut~.l U~ t~UN UtVtLUrntNi
e
~, Uj
rHfi NU. ~Uqj{l~l~~
e
Business LIcense Tax in VirginIa's Counties and Cities (conl'd)
(Ca1~ndar Y~a.r 1990 or Tax Year 1990-91)
City
Type of
B usi ness
Covin gtcn
retail ers
n' ail orde.r flnns
wholes.nlcrs and distributors
fi n3nC i al servi c es
b US1 ness serv ic e.s
D:1n vi 11 e
retailers
mail order firms
whole.s.alers and distrihutors
financial services
business services
Emparl!
retailers
mail order firms
\S-rh 0 lCS3lers and di stri but ors
fi n J.nci al services
business services
Fairfax
re Lail ers
mail order firms
~.ho)e~lc:rs ana dislributors
fi n an ci al sc rvie es
bus in esS serv ices
Falls Church
retailers
mail order finns
wholesalers and disuibutors
fi nancial services
business services
Franklin
retail ers
m 311 ord er rums
who lesn]ers and distributors
financi.al services
business services
Fredericks bur g
retailers
mail order fim,s
wholcsnlers ~nd disuibutors
fi nancicl services
b usi n ess servic es
G a.la.x
retai]ers
m ail order firm s
whole$.3.1ers and distributors
financial services
busi ness serv ices
TtlX R:J.te per S 1 00 of Oross Re.ceipts
..20
.36
~ 12
~58
.36
.20
none
~ 15 gross purch:lses
.20
.36
. 620/5100 on the f1!st 5600.000 + t 151S 100 on .excess
none
no rate provided
.55
.35
gT~ter or $30 or 6201S100
gre:1ler of S30 or ..201S 100
grealer of $30 or .05/S 100
greJter of 530 or .401S 100
gr~ter of $30 or ,,27/$100
.19
.35
.08 gross purch~es
.54
..35
S20 on f1TS{ $2,000 .... .291S100 on excess
S30 on flfst S3.C()() + .44f) 100 on excess
S50 on first S lO~OOO gross purch:lSes + JOIS 100 on excess
$30 on first S3~OOO + .74/S 100 on exceA~S
$30 on f1fSl S3.().')O + .44/$100 on excess
gr~ter of $30 or ~201S100
greater of 530 or ~201S 100
greater of 530 or ~051S 100 gross purchases
greater of 530 or ~461S 100
gre.3ler of 530 or ,36/S 100
gre.artr of 530 or .20/5100
grc:lter .of 530 or ..201S 100
S 50 on l he first S 10 J 000 + ~ 175/5 100 on ex c ess
no rale provided
g red lcr of S 30 or .201S 100
16
00 058
City
e
e
Business License Tax In virginiats Counties and Cities (conl'd)
(Cal~ndar Yw ~190 or Tax Ye3I 1990-91)
Type of
B usi ness
Tax R ;lte per S 100 of Gross ReceiplS
H :lmpton
H :lrrisonh ur g
Hopewell
Lexing ton
Lynchburg
M:lnassas
Man :1.SS~ Park
Martinsville
rel.3.il ers
m nil order fions
v.'holes.n.lers and disuibutors
fin anci a1 s~rvi c es
business service~
retailers
mail ord er f l!lTlS
wholesalers and distributors
finnnci a1 services
bus i ness services
rela il ers
mail order firms
wholes.:llers: and dj.srributor~
finane i ill services
bus iness s eNtC es
reo tai 1 ers
m ai I 0 rder finns
wholesalers and distributors
fi nanc i al servic es
business ser\' ices
reta ilers
mail order rums
wholesolcrs and disuibutors
finane ial servic es
business s eN ices
retail ers
mail order rums
whole$.31ers and disuibutors
fi nan ci a] services
b usi n ess servic es
retail erS
mail order rums
~tholes31ers and disLI'ibutors
fin31lc i at servi c es
business services
retailers
n1 ail order fums
w holesaJers and distributors
fin anci at services
bu si n ess servic es
gretller of $30 or ;20{S 100 on first 5200.000 + ~24/S 100 on the next
$39..8 miL
gfe:tter of 530 or ..39/S 100
S 50 on f lfSt S 1 O~OOO gross pure hases + .15/S 100 on excess
no Ulte provided
grc:1ler of 530 or .47 IS I 00
~20
.20
. 17 gross purch ases
..58
no rat e provided
gr~ let 0 f 530 or ~201S 100'
no nte provided
greater of S 1 00 or .25/$ 100 gross purchases
g re...11 er of S30 or . 5&/S 100
grea l er of 530 or ~36JS) 00
gre41 tet of S30 or ~2 OIS 1 00
retailers at retail nue on gross receiptS, wholesalers at ~'ho)esa}e rate on
g tOSS pure hases
.05 gross purch~ses
greater of $30 or .58/S 100
greater of S30 or ..36/S 100
greater of $30 or .20JS 100
gr~ter of 530 or ~20/S 100 on the fltSt 520 n\it + ..OSIS 100 on the next
$20 mil. + ..OllSlOO on excess over 540 miL '
grea ter of 530 or .28/S1 00 gross pure h J..~S
gren.ter of S30 or ~581S 100
greater of 530 or .361S 100
greater of S30 or ..1 01S1 00
gr~ter of 530 or ~lO/$l00
S25 on lhe first S 1 0,000 + .10/S 1 00 on excess
greater of 530 or .35/$100
gre:ner oC $30 or ..22/S 100
~ 15
none
~ 05 gross p lJ rc h ascs
.18 .
~18
.20
retailers at retail rale on gross receipts~ wholesalers at wholesale rate on
gross purchases
..05 gross PUTch:lses
.20
.:16
17
00 059
FEB-24-92 MON 11:00
DEPT OF ECON l)~VtLUPM1:NT
It
fJ. Uo
rAX NUl eU4j(1~le~
e
Business License Tax in Virginia's Counties and CitIes (cont'd)
(Calendar Year 1990 or Tax Year 1990-91)
City
Tyr.e 0 f
Business
Tax Rale per 5100 of GrosS Receipts
NeVIlpen News
retailers
mail order rums
~'ho]csaJers and disuibulors
fln anc i nl servi c es
bus in (:ss serv ices
Norfolk
re ta il crs
mail order firms
w h ole ~l e rs an d d i stri b ulOrs
fi nanci a1 5en.;ces
business services
Norton
re lail ers
mail order firms
~'holesalers and distribulors
fi nan c i:1l servi ces
bu s i ness services
Pc lers burg
re uil ers
mail order rums
wholesalers and distributors
~
fi n :ll'lci aJ servi c es
business services
Poquoson
reta il ers
mail ord er finns
~'hole~ters Jrtd distributors
fi n me i al services
business services
Portsmouth
re tai1ers
mail order rums
whole.ul~rs and distributors
financial services
bu s i ness servic es
Radford
tet:lil ers
m ail order (inns
whole~lers and distributors
fi nanci~ se.rvic es
bu sin ess s ervic es
Richmond
re:~jJers
mail order rums
whole5:1lers and diSlributors
fi n an cial servi c es
bu si ness serv ices
$39 on the first $3J()() + .35/$100 on e:xcess
nO r3re provided
$50 on the firsl $1 O~OOO gross purchJSes + ~20/$1 00 on e~cess
no rale pro v ided
$39 on the firSl 53,OC>Q + .40/S 100 on excess
~20
.20
S50 + .15/S 100 gross purchases
.~8
.36
.20
no role provided
425 on lhe flt:it S 1 mil. gross purchases + .05/S 100 on excess
.50
..36
.24
.32
$35 on the f11S[ S4JXX) gross purchases + 4251S 100 on the next S961000
T .ISIS 100 on the next $ 1 OO~OOO + .101S 100 on excess over $200.000
$500 on the first S50..000 + ..501S 100 on excess
.32
gr~ter of S30 or .15/$100
no rate provided
405 g ro S s purch:) ses
greater of $30 or ..301S 100
greater of $30 or .3~/S 100
$50 on the first S5.c()() + .201S 100 on excess
$50 on the rust S5,OCJO -+ .20/5 100 on excess
S 5 0 on the firs t S S.(X)Q gross purch 3.Ses + _I51S 1 00 on exc ess
S50 on the first $5,000 + .591S 100 on exctss
550 on the flt5t S5.coo + .36/S 100 on excess
.135
no rat e provided
.068 gross p ute h ases
.365
~14
.375
.375
.22 grass p urch ases
no mte provided
.58
18
o 0 0 6.0
FEB-24-92 MON.11:00
Ci(y
DEPT OF ECON DEVELOPMENT
e
P. 06 .
FAX NO. 8043718185
e
Business LIcense Tax in Virginia's Counties and Cities (cont'd)
(Calendar Yeae 1990 or Tax Ye Sf 1.99()"91)
Type of
Business
Tax R~te per S100 of Gross Receipts
Roanoke
SoJcm
Soulh Boston
Sl3unlon
Suffolk
Virgin ia B cae h
Waynesboro
Williamsburg
retailers
mail order firms
~'hole$.3iers and distribUlors
financial services
bu s i ness serv ic es
re ta it ers
mail order fi nns
wholes..1lers and distributors
fin anc ial services
business services -
re tail ers
mail order finns
wholesnlers and disLributors
fin 3nci rU se rvi c es
business serv ie es
re lailers
mail ord er finns
who les:1 t ers an d d i stri b ut or$
fin:lIl ci al s eNic es
b usi n ess s ervic es
retailers
mail order rums
wholesalers and distributors
finan ci a.I servi ces
bus i ness s ervic es
retailers
m a.i 1 order !inns
wholesalers and distribulors
fin;l1lcial services
bu sincss services
rc tail ers
mail order firms
wholesalers and distributors
fi n ancinl servic es
bu si n css serv ices
remilers
mai 1 order finns
who] cSc11crs and distributors
fi n:m cia] services
bu si n e ss serv ic: es
~20
.20 On the fust $20 mit + ~05J$1 00 on the ne xl $20 mil. + .01 /S 100 on
excess over S40 miL
S44 + .26/5100 gross purchases
.58
.36
.20
.20
.13 gross p urch ases
.20
.36
.20
no rate pro\" ided
.20 gross purchtises
.5&
..36
.20
.20
S 100 on lhe rust S 1 OJJOO gross purchases + .50 on the next S40~OOO +
.12{S 100 on ex cess over S 50 JX)O
.40
f36
gren (er of $30 or .201S 100
.09 on the flISt $25 miL
gr~ler 0 f S 50 or .09 IS 100 g ros s purchase s
greJler of 530 or .58/S 100
grea ter of $30 or .5 8/S 100
..20
grea.ler of 530 or .20 on the first $.40 mil. + ~10/S 100 on !he next. 520
mil. ... ..05/S 1 00 on the next $40 mil. + .025/S 100 on excess over S 100
mil.
. 12 gross p ute h3Sl!S
gr~ter of $30 or .36($ 100
no rate prey ided
greater of 530 or .20/5100
gr~ter of $30 or .20/$100
S 50 + .15/S 100 gross pure hases
.58
.36
~20
.20
.05
.58
.36
19
00 061
FEB-24-92 MON 11:01
DEPT OF ECON DEVELOPMENT
e
FAX NO. 8043"r1818b
e
fl.U(
Business License Tax In Virginia's Counties and Cities (cont'd)
(Calendar Year 1990 or Tal Year 1990.91)
City
Type of
B usi ness
Tax Rate per $100 of Gross ReceipLS
Wine hCSl cr
retailers
mail ordtr finn s
wholesalers and distributors
fin~ci31 services
b usi n ess services
g~ler of $30 or .20/$100
gr~ter of 530 Of .25/S 100
$50 on the first S 1 O~OOO gross purch3Ses + .20/5100 on excess
.58
.25
S Qurce:
In July 1991.lhe Virginia Depanmenl of Economic Developmem sent a LU qucstionn3ire LO the Commissioner of
the Revenue. Director of Finance. or Supervisor of Assessments in each county and city in Lhe Sl.'lte. Their
comments on how business license taxes are imposed in their localilies are summarized in this table.
20
00 062
FEB-24-92 MON 11:01
DE?T OF ECON DEVELOPMENT
e .
FAX NO. 8043718185
e
P. 08
Memorandum
To:
Feorn:
Date~
S ubjec [:
Research Staff, research file, "Taxc.~: Merch3Jltst Capital--
10 Ann M. Draughn ,~" c-:>
Dee.ember 24. 1991 :J
Merchants' Capital Ta:t for the calendar Year 1991 or tax year 1991...92
Th1 pO R T ANT NOTE: 1 f th cre are q u es t ions as to how an indi vi dual co m pan y wi 11 be. c lassifie d and tax cd
regarding a merchn.nlS~ C3pital w:, the recomnlendation of the. Department of Economic
DeveJopment (as advised by the Virginia Department of Taxation) is that ale company
should contact lhe commissioner of the revenue of the locality(ics) in question and obtain
in wril in g how me company W QuId be taxed..
Localities may impose a taX on the capital of merchanlS. ~Capital" is defined as inventory of stock on hand. certain
daily rental passenger CMS. certain daily ren lal" propcrtyi and all other taXable tangible person:al property.. Money
on h~d and on deposit. and tangible personal property not offered for sale as merchandise are not considered capita1~
Goods imported in foreign commerce are not subject to the merchanlS t capital taX until [hey lose their SLatuS as
impons. This occurs when lhe psckage in which they were shipped is opened. \\'hen !he property has reached its
second place of rest or storage after being unloaded or sold. or when such goods have been committed by the
im porter 10 current 0 pern ti on need s.
Tax roles and assessment nuios may not be hi 2her than lhose in effect on January 1. 1978. Howeyer, both tax taleS
and assessment ratios are pennined lO be ~ than those in effect on January 11 1918.. There are no guidelines
in the tax code re gardin g the ~ci fic val ual io n of mere han ts · cap i tal other than lhe cons l i tl.1 tiQnal requ irement th al
personal propeny be assessed at · fair market val ue: However. this general valuation requirement doesn' t make
much sense, per set because of the difficulty of measuring this value, and because there are, by ddault. several
allo\\~able methods for valuing merchants' capit.3.l (Federal COflJOrate Income Tax Form 1120 describes allowable
methods for the valuation oC closing inventory Cor fcdetlllw:. purpoSCS)1l Thus, cornmisSloncrs of the revenue h~_ve
much flexibility regarding the valuation method used in their respective localities. The situs for assessment and
taxation is the locality in which the property is physically located on the locality's tax day (USl1111y January 1).
FiftY-lhree of Virginia: s 95 counties impose a merchantsl capital tax.. Of the remaining 42 counties which do not
impose the merchants' capitsl taX. 36 impose the business license tax: six counties impose neither Ihe merchants'
capital laX .!lQL the b\JSiness license taX (Accomack. Bath. Halifax. Nelson (except contrdctors), Rappahannoclc. and
Washington). None of Virginia's cities impose the merchilJllS. capit31~. Rather~ all 41 cities opt to impose [he
business license tax which is in lieu of a n1erc:h:mt's c.ap~t.al tax.. Thus. a locality may impose one or the other, Q!;,
neither of the two t)"pCS of taxcs~
Most counties (45 of 53) use original cost as the value used for the assessment of merchants- capitaL The effective
tax rate (on (he first S 100.000. to take into account the four counties using multiple assessment percenw,ges
dep'~nding On 'he amount of capital) for the 4S counties using original cost varies from a law of SO.20/$ 100 to a high
of S 1.55/S 100.. Counties used a ,^ride range of combinations of high nominal tax rate/low assessmenr (';ltjo co low
nomin al laX Tnt e/hi g h as sessm ent ratio to 3 un..in the varyin g e ff ec ti ve L3X ra les.
1
00 063.
FEB-24-82 MON 11:02
DEPT OF ECON DEVELOPMENT
e
FAX NO. 8043718185
e
P. ~09 --- _rH
Merchants' CapItal Tax in Virginia's Counties and Cities
(C:ucnd3.( 'It.at 1991 or T3X Year 1991-92)
Effective Tax
R:ue Per Sl00
Tax Rate Value Used Assess ment (Rates are not
County Per S 100 for Assessmenl Ratio Comptl~bJe · )
Accomack none
Albemarle none
AlJeghany none
Amelia none
Amherst S 3.95 on gin a1 COSt 20 % S ..79
A P porn:l t lox 1.00 original cost 85 .85
i\.t lin g Ion none
Augusta none
Bath none
Bedford 2.20 r air market value 20 .44
B ]arld ~73 on gi nal cost 100 ~73
B oletOurt none
Bruns",.ick 1.20 origi nal cost 100 1..20
Buchanan 2.00 ari gin3.l cost 10 ..20
B ucki ngham 1..00 original cost 100 1 ):>0
Campbell t 3.15 original cost 33.3 L05
Caroline none
Carroll 2.30 ori g inal COSl 30 .69
Ch:rrles City ~ 2.80 fair market value 100 2.80
Char10ne 3.20 f 3 it market vat ue 10 .32
Cheslerfield none
Clarke none
Crai g 3.50 original cost 25 .88
Culpeper 2.25 onginal cost 40 .90
Cumberland none
Dickenson 10.50 origin:ll cost 10 1.05
Dinwiddie none
Essex 3.75 ori gi n:1l cost (0 - SSOllOC(l) 50 % 1..88
(next $25.00)) 25 % .94
(next $25,0(0) 10 % ..38
(over 5100.000) 5 % .19
Fairfax none
Fauquier none
Floyd 3~50 original cost 15 ..53
Flu\'anna) 1..55 on gi n al coSt 100 1..55
FrnnKli n 5.40 original cost 20 1.08
Fred ~ri ck none
Giles 4.80 on gi nal cost 25 1..20
G\oucesler none
Goochland none
G ray son 6~70 ' ori gi na! CQS l 10 ..67
2
00 064
FEB-24-92 MON 11:03
DEPT i ECON DEVELOPMENT
FAX NO. 8043718185
e
P. 10
Merchants' Capital Tax in Virginia's Counties and Cities (cont'd)
(Cah:ndar YeM t 991 or T~:r. 'i ear 1991-92)
EfCCClive Tax
Rale Per S 100
T~ Rale Value lJsed Assessment (Rates are not
County Per $100 for Assessment Rati 0 Comparable · )
Greene none
G teens vii \ e none
Halifax none
Hanover S 2.60 on gin~ cost 10 0/0 $ 26
H~nrico none
Henry none
Highland 1900 ori gin al c:()~t 20 ~20
Isle of Wight none
James City none
King and Queen .65 . on gin oJ co st 100 .65
King George none
King William 3.90 oM ginnl co st 20 ~78
Lancaster LOO original eost 100 1.00
Lee 1~25 fa it mzk et va1 ue 30 .38
Loudoun none
Louisa .65 on ginJl cost 100 .65
Luncnburg 1~20 on gi nal COSt 40 .48
_ Madison 4.30 ori g in31 cost 20 ,&6
Mathews none
MeckJenburg 1.45 original cost 50 .73
M ddleseA 1.25 on g i naJ cost 35 ~44
Montgomery 6~O5 on g in at cost 20 1~21
Nelson none
New Kent none.
Northamplon 6.2S fair market va1 ue 10 ,,63
NoIthumberland 2.40 on gi n al cost 50 1,,20
NOllov.'ay none
Orange ~40 original cost 100 .40
Page 1.50 on ginal cost 20 ..30
Pa trick 3.50 on ginal cost 30 11005
Pit lSy 1 "an ia 2..7S ori ginal cOSt 30 .83
Powh3lan none
Prince Edvlard .70 on gin al CDS l 100 ~70
Prince George none
Prince William none
PUllSki 4.80 ori ginnl cost (0 .. S300JOO) 22 0/0 1~06
(over 53004000) 5 % ,,24
RappahJnnock none
Richmond 3~SO on gi n aJ cost (0 A S25,OCXJ) 50 0/0 1.15
(next 525.000) 30 % 1.05
(next S50.0c0) 20 % .70
(over $100.000) 10 % .35
3
00 065
FEB-24-92 MON 11:03
DEPT OF ECON DEVELOPMENT
e
rAX NU. 8043718185
e
P. 11
Mer'chants' Capital Tax In virglniats Counties and Cities (coned)
(Calendar YeN 1991 or Tax Year 1991-92)
Tax Rate
County Per $100
Roanoke none
Roc.kbridge none
Rockingham S .81
Russell 5.75
Scott ~72
She n3!1do aft 4f(J
SmyLh ..60
Southnm pIon .50
S palSY 1 vania none
, S tarf or~ ~50 .
Surry none
Sussex l~OO
Taz.cweU " 4~30
Warren none
Washinglon none
~' eslnlOfC land _50
'V\, ise. 4 2.85
Wythe 456
York none
Value U.std
Cor Assessment
Asses s ment
Ratio
Effective Tax.
Rate Pet S 100
(Rates are not
Comp31able · )
fair mJIket value 66 % S .53
fair marker val ue 20 1.15
on gi n a1 cost 100 ~72
on gi n:.tl co st 100 ~€lJ
on gi n al cost 100 ..50
original cost 100 .50
on ginnl cost 10() ..so
on gi nal cost 100 1..00
oei gi n 31 cost 20 .&6
100
(0-$300,000) 4S %
(next S 1 00,000) 3S 0/0
(excess over S400,COO) 2S '10
fair market val u e 100
~so
1_28
1.00
~71
.56
on gi n:ll cost
originl1 cost
The effective tax rate for each county was compuled by multiplying the assessment ratio by the nominal
ta.., rote.. There do not e'tist specific guidelines re.garding the valuation of merchants' capital.. Current
melhods are based on both original total capitalized cost and the depreciated (appreciated) cost (book value);,
. Because the relationship between the [\Va methods of valuing merchantst capital varies. comparisons of
effective tax rates are valid only among localities using lhe same assessment value method.
This locality also imposes a merchn.nts' capit:J.l tax on daily rental passenger cars and short term rental items.
This locality also imposes a merCh:lnLS' capital tax on accounts receivable less accounts p3yn.ble.
This locality also imposes a n1erchantS' capira) tax on the p~y~ble compensation to licensed ~es agents
of lottery tickets~
'1
This. locality also in'pose..~ a merchants' capi l3.l laX on daily renl:ll eq ui pmenL
Source; In July 1991. the Virginia Departmen[ of Economic Dev~lopment sent a tax queslionnnife to the
Commissioner of the Revenue, Director of Finance1 or Supervisor of Assessments in each county and city
in the Slale~ Their comments on how mcrchJ1lltS capital is taxed in their localities are summarized in lhis
table~
4
00 066
FEB-24-92 NON 10:26
DEP4IjF ECON DEVELOPMENT FAX NO. 4ij3718185
P. 01
..&.~}
,F -: ~tt .. ..... ~
~' . "
l. ,
,"" ~.~ .
. ..;,J e.
\ ':'.jr.. l~'~ ii
~~~!~a~~~
~~~.
COMMONWEliLTH of VIRGINIA
Deparrmem of Economic Development
L.. Douglas Wilder
Gov e roor
" FAX N"U1\1BER: (804) 371-'8185
DATE: 7-.-2.-1 -q L-
TO: -- G..~~ L~€..v-
FROM: 0V~A G ltLll~,r
~fO. OF PAGES (Including Title Page)
2. I + Lf -;:.. z.. s:-
\ ("~\
RE: h-tCQ.t-t.-~ ~--f!. S
FAX ~m1BER:
/qfo - 303~
~~ fA-t-~"0~ (~ ~ .€~ ~
---. ~
~ e.~:{.1 ct'~ 1: ~.-t Lo~!k.
G~ ~L
,
f\1ESSAGE:
..ll ~.t.-~
Wb.
00 067
FEB-24-92 MON 10:27
DE~F ECON DEVELOPMENT
FAX NO, ~3718185
P. U2
r.1 emorandum
To:
From:
Da te:
Subject
Research Staff. Re5e.arch file hTaxes: Business License T~"
Jo Ann ~1~ Drnughn "J ,._"~(.~
December 244 1991
Business License TalC in Virginia's Counties arld Cities for lhe calendar Yc.'U' 1991 or tax
year 1991..92
I1\1PORTANT NO~rE:
If there are questiolls as to ho..... an individual company win be c1:t~sified nnd taxed regarding a
business liccnse lax. lhe recommendation of the Depnrtment of EconomiC Developmcnt (~ .advised
by the Virr)nia Department of Tax;Uion) is lh,llthe company should coolact Ihe commlStnoncr of
the revenue of the locality(ies) in question aud obL1in in writing how the comp.Jny would be I.:lxed.
Counties. cities. and towns may iml)()Se local license tl'l\tS on businesses. Ir.1des. profcssions. occupations. and callings. Most business
license tnxe.~ ore based Oil "gross re(;eirls." Un(ortun3tely, the definition of this concept is not pro\'i~:d in the license ~ section of
the Code 01 Virgi'litJ, and the Dcpar1ment of Taxation has not issued an advisory opinion on the defimhon. Wholesalers license lAxes
are usuallj' based on gross purchases. No definition is provided for iliis concept either. The ta:dng systems used by localities VaI)'.
SOlne t()Calities w: businesses at a set tale per $100 of gross receipL~. regardless of the volume of rece.ip~. Olhers apply schedules
which use different rates depending on the volume of receipts. Many localities apply minimum and m:lXimum values. Still others
impose flat Cw: regardless of the volume of receipts or the type of business.
A license lax on merchanls' gross reeeit'ts or purchases is in lieu of a merchallls' capital tax. Thus. a locality may impose one or the
olher. or, neither of the two. For the lax year 1991-92, 36 of the 9S counties. and aU 41 citie~ imposed a business license lrot. SLx
loc.,litie.<l impose neither the business license nor the merchants' capiwlaX (the counties of Accomack. Bnm. Ha1if~. Ne1son(excepl
conII3ctors). Rnt'N.h:mnock. <,nd Washington). Some localities tax some classifications of businesses while nol taxing Olher
c1assificaL':ons. For example. Pri.nce George County does not imp3se a business license laX on wholesalers and disllibutors. The
localitiM imposing a businl?~g license lax rend 10 be located in thr~ ge.ographic areas of tlle stale: northern Virginia. centrnl
Shenandoah Valley, and the southe~\sten\ section of the stale encompassing the Richmond metropolitan area and exrending southe:!.!)[
through lhe Tide,^'aler region.
The 1978 Virsinia Oenen\l As.s.embty required the Virginia DepM1me.nl of Taxation to promulgate guidelines defining and explaining
the calegorics o( enterprises fot the use or local govemmenLS in adminislering thi.<; tax. The re.c;ulting publicalion. "GuJde1ines". was
Upd3lCd last in July t 983.
The 1991 DED t,1X queS'tionnaire requeskd in(oml3tion on five busin~ss c13Ssificatiotls. The classifications. thtir respeclive definition
from "Gujdeline~". and their rute limitation as liste.d in the Code of Virginia are described below. Note that lhere is often "no rale
provided" for some or the calegories in some localities. This may be. due to several reasons, most nOl.1bly, iliat the locnlily has not
encountered this type or busine!is to dale. ClarificalioM for these categories in the localilies will have to be obtained by calling the
cOfnnlissioner of the r~vcnue.
Some localities have tAA rates that exceed lhe imposed r<t1e limits. This i.~ due to a. gra.ndfalher clause in Lhe Code which pennits
localities to maintain. under cenain conditions. to",,, rates exceeding the tate limitations established January 1. 1978.
Retailer:
A.ny per~on \!"ho makes sales of goods. wares. and merchnndise fOJ any purpose other than resale. but not including
sales Dt wholesale to institutional. commercial, and induslria! users. The ra!c limilalion is .201S 100 gross receipts.
Mail Order:
No specific guideline.s are prOville.d in "Guidelines". Localities often tax the business at the rate. for relailers or for
who 1 esaJers d ere nd in g 011 I he nl ai I Of d er bu s i nes~.
Wholesaler:
Any penon who sells to others for resale or who sells at wholtsnle to inslitutiol\31. commercial, or industrial users.
"Guidelin~s" proposes thaI "wholesaler" is not susceptible 10 a general delinition which will cover all possible
situations. The determination of individual quts!ion~ will depend upon the partkubr f:lels of the case. The Tax
Comm iss ianer has the aulhorilY to issue an advisory opinion in specific cases. The rale Umit::llion is .05/$100 gross
purchases.
1
00 068
FEB-24-92 MON 10:28
DEP~F ECON DEVELOPMENT
FAX NO, 4Ij3718185
P. 03
Fi nftflC ial S e 1'-< lC es:
The rate Ii m i tation is 458/5 100 gross reee ipts t
Business Services:
Any service rendered for compens.:ttion to any busines~. t.rnde. occup31ion. or governmental agency. The rtlle
llm iltltion is .36/$ 100 gross recei pts t
A license tllt n13Y not be leyied on a manufactwer for the privilege or manufacturing and selling goods. wares. and merchandise al
,,~hoICS3.le at the place of m :l1lU fac I urc A
1
00 069
FEB-24-92 MON 10:28
DEFT ~CON DEVELOPMENT
FAX NO, 80~8185
P. 04
Business License Tax in Virginia's Counties and Cities
(Cftlendllt Ytar 1991 or Ts.x Yc:u 1991--92)
Type of
Business
County
Tax Rnle per SIOO of Gross Receipts
A c con\.~c k
Albemarle
Allegh any
Amelia.
AnI hers t
(bus ine sses not
subject lo a
nlerchants't
capital laX)
AppomaltOX
Art in glon
Augusla
re lail ers
m ai I order rlInls
",'holesalers and disuibutors
fi n nne ial services
bus;ne sS services
re tailcrs
"':lll or d er fi nus
wholcsn.lcrs and distributors
fin3Jlcial se rvices
business services
re ta i1 e rs
milil order flfms
'Atholcs.alers and disb+ibutors
Ii T1 anci31 services
busi ness s erv ices
retailers
",nil order fimls
~'hole.salers and distributors
fi nanci31 services
business services
re tail ers
"1m 1 order finns
\\'hol~s.31ers and d i slributors
financial se......iccs
bu s iness services
re lai I ers
m ai I order fim, s
wholeulers and distributors
financial services
bu s i nesg servic es
,etnUe~
nlail order Onns
\\'holesalers and distributors
fin ane i al se[\J ices
busi ness scrvi~e...~
rcta ile-fs
nlail order finns
wholesalers and dislributors
Ii nancjaJ services
bu si nes~ se rvices
none
none
none
none
nonc
.20
.20
.05 gross purch~ses
.58
.36
8r~\fer of $15 or .10/$100
gren1er or S15 or .l0r5100
.05 gross pun:hases
greater of S15 or ,291$ 100
gre3ler of $' S or .18/$100
.05
.05
.05
.15
.09
no rate provided
.31
no rnte provided
650
.31
none
none
none
none
none
.20
.20 (retail)
.08
..58
.35 (.36 fOf some specia1 izcd serv ices including software prograrnm ing
or travel agencies)
.20
.25
~05
.25
.20
3
00 070
FEB-24-92 MON 10:29
DEWF ECON DEVELOPMENT
FAX NO. 1371B18~
~4 Ub
Business License Tax In Virgln1a's Counties and Cities (coord)
(Caltndar Year 1991 or Ta,. Year 1991..92)
CountY
type Or
B usincs5
Tax Rate per SlOO of Gross R.eceipts
Balh
re 13 iI ers
mail order flrnls
wholeSt11ers and di stributorS
finaJ\ci31 services
business services
Bedford
rctnHers
"t3il order fi.nns
\\'hole~leT5 ant! dh;lribu(ors
financial services
business services
Blnnd
retailers
mail order rums
\vholesaters and distributors
fioane i at services
business services
Bolelourt
re tailers
mail order flrol.s
wholes.alers and di stribulors
Ii nancial ser\' ices
business services
Bruns\vick
retailer 5
mail order flITl1 S
\\'holesalers and di s ltihutors
financial services
busitlcss services
Buchanan
re rail crs
m ai 1 order r lflllS
whole-salers and dislributOTS
linancfal services
business services
Buckingham
retailers
muil order (lnns
whotes~l1ers 3Jld distributors
financial service.9
business service!;
Campbell
retailer s
mail order finns
vdlolesnJet~ and djstributors
flndIlcial services
busines~ ~ervice~
none
none
nont
none
none
none
none
none
none
none
none
none
none
none
none
.10
no rnte provided
.05 gross purchases
no fate provided
.18
none
none
none
none
none
none
none
none
none
none
none
none
none
none
none
none
none
none
none
none
"Q 0 071
FEB-24-92 MON 10:29
DEP4Iif ECON DEVELOPMENT
FAX NO. ~718185
Business LIcense Tax In Virginia's Counties and Cities (conrtd)
(Calend at Year 1991 or T 'J. V tEll' 1991-92)
County
Type or
Bus iness
Tax Rate per Sloo of GrDss Receipts
Caroline
re 13 il erS
mail order rums
wholcsnlers and distrihutors
financ i aI s~rvi.ces
bus;nts~ services
.15
no rate provided
~OS
.49
,,29
Carroll
re ta i 1 ers
nl ai t ord er finn s
wholesalers and di slIibulors
fi n an c ial servi c es
bus i ness serv ic es
none
none
none
none
none
Charles City
relailers
nlail order f1111\S
\\'holes3Iers and di stribulors
financi at se rvjce~
business services
none
none
none
none
none
Charlot le
re l~\ ilers
ntail order fl1TllJ
wholesalers and distributors
financinl services
b usi ness s erv ic tS
none
none
none
none
none
CtH~$ ~erfi eld
relailers
mail order firms
whol es.ale rS and di stIi bulor$
fin ane i a1 se TV ic es
business services
..20
.20
..10 gross purchases
.58
~36
Clarke
re tail ers
nlail order ftnn,Q
who I e sa I e ~ an d d j stri bu tors
fi n an c i aI servi c es
bus i ness sen.' ic e s
$25 fee
$ 25 fee
$25 fee
$25 fee
$25 fe,e
Craig
r eta iI ers
m ail order fi rmS
~. he Ie sn lers and dislributors
Ci 1l31l ci aJ se rv ices
bu .;i n e~ s. s erv ices
none
hone
none
none
none
Culpeper
IcrtJilers
n1 ai lord er firm s
\\'holes,alc.rs and distributors
fin:mcial services
busin~ss services
none
none
none
none
none
s
P. 06
00 072
FEB-24-92 MON 10:30
DEPW ECON DEVELOPMENT
FAX NO. 8~718185
BusineS9 License Tax In Virginia's Counties and Cities (confd)
(Calendar Year 1991 or Tax Year 199) -92)
County
~rype of
B usi ncss
Tax Rate per $100 of Gross Receiptq
C un, be rI and
retaiJers
m a.i 1 order funlS
v..holes.nlers and distribulors
Ii n IDe i at se~r i c tS
business serv ices
.05
~05
.05
.05
.05
Dicke n SOil
relal f er~
n\ nil order rum s
wholc~\lerg and di stri butors
finane ial services
business services
none
none
none
none
none
Dinwiddie
Ietailers
nl ai I order fi.rms
w holcsnters and distributors
financjaJ services
business services
8r~' ler of S25 or .16/$100
greater or $25 or .30/$ 100
greater of $25 or .05/5 100
greater of 525 or .45ts 1 00
greater of $2 S or .301S 100
Essex
re la. ilers
n, ail order fimu~
\If holesa Ie rs and di sui b ulors
fi n an c i aI seev] c es
busi nCS$ services
none
none
none
pone
none
Fairfax
rela iI erS
nlail order fimlS
~'holeS31ers and dj sLri butors
fi n ane i aI se rvic es
bus i ne~s. s erv ic es
~ 17
.17
.04 gross purch ases
.16
.20
Fa.uquicr
re taiJers
mail order fim)s
who 1 es.al ers an d di sLri bu I ors
Ii n me j aJ se rvi c es
business services
$20 + ..101$100 on excess over $10.000
$20 + ..10/$1.00 on excess over S 10J()()
.05 gross pure h ases
$20 1- .30/5100 on excess over $3.500
S 20 + .. 20/S 100 on ex cess over $ 6 ,(}(x)
Floyd
retailers
mail order finns
v.. hol es.aters and distri bulors
financial services
busines~ serv ices
none
none
none
none
none
F1uvanna
re Ij i JeTS
nl ail order fi nn s
who I esa 1 e rs and di ~ h"i bur ors
fi n3Jlcial services
business servicc5
none
none
none
no nt:
no n I~
6
P. 07
00 073
FEB-24-92 MON 10:30
DEPW ECON DEVELOPMENT
FAX NO, ~718185
P. 08
Business License Tax in Virginia's Counties and Cities (confd)
(CIl)cnd.,. Yt:ar 1991 or Tax YtM 1991.92)
County
Type or
B usine ss
F rdrl k.l in
rctallers
mail order firms
wholeS3.lers and distr ibutor~
financial services
busi ness serv ic es
Frederick
rtLailers
mail order (inns
w hoies.nlers and disrr j butors
fi f\anc i J.l se rvi ces
business services
Giles
re ta it ers
m a.i t order fi fill S
W h 01 C S;l Je nt and d is rrj b U f Drs
financi at sc rvices
business services
G louce$IC~I
re lai I er ~
mail order f"inns
\I,--holesalers and distri bulors
fi n anc i al se rv j c e s
business str'Viccs
Goochland
re laiJers
mail order fmns
\vholes.alers and distrihulors
financial services
bu siness serv ices
Grayson
Ie (ail ers
mail order filnl S
VI h 01 es.a let sand d is tri but org
fi nnn c i at servi c es
business services
Greene
re tail ers
n1m1 order fi.m's
wholesalers and di slributors
fi n:mcial services
busi ncss services
Greens vUle
ret:lilers
01 a..i I Dr d er finn s
wholes.JJers and di slribUlors
fi nane i at se rv ic es
b u.~ i ness s erv ices
Tax R~te per $100 of GfO~.i Recejp~
none
non~
none
none
none
.20
.20
~05 gross purchases
.58
~36
none
none
none
none
none
greater of $30 or .10/$ 100 on lhe ~rst 5200.000 + &20/$ tOO on e:xcess
greater of 530 or .101S 100 on the fir~t S200.0<)0 + ~20/S 100 on exces~
greater of 530 or ~OS/$l 00 gross purchases
gr~1ler of $30 or .12/$100
greater of S30 or .10/$100
greater of 52 S or ~ 10/$1.00 on the first $25 ~OOO "t ~051S 100 on excess
gre..lIer of $25 or .IOIS 100 on the rltSl $25.000 + .OS/S]oo on exc~S
gre.aler of $25 or .025/$100 gross purchases
gre~ter of $25 or .10,'S 1 ()() on the first S25t(X)() + .151S 100 on excess
grea tee of $25 or .10/$ (00
none
none
none
none
none
.1.5
~27
.04 g ros s p urcha ses
.44
.27
~ 16
.16
~ 05 gr 0~ i pure hn.ses
a50
..40
7
00 074
FEB-24-82 MON lU:31
Di:PT UF tCUN 1Jt.VtLuP['ll:.[~ l
e
r fiX NUt (j U q j I 1 () 1 () ~
e
r't U8
BusIness License Tax In virglnla's Counties and Cities (cont'd)
(C.alendar YeM 1991 or Tax Y tar 1991-92)
County
Type of
Busincs!1
H31if~
retailers
n1 ai lord er firol S
Vt'holes:11crs and di stti bulor~
financial services
business services
H :lnover
rel3.il ers
nlail older finns
wholesnlers and disu"ibulors
fi nanc i al se rvi c es
bus i ness scrv ic es
Hcnrico
rc l.a51ers
mai 1 order funlS
whole~,lers and disuibulors
fi n anc i al ser\' i c e~
bu si nc-s s serv ic e s
Henry
re la it ers
nl s.i 1 order fi rm 9
wholesnlers nnd dislriblltors
financi at services
bus in ess se rv ices
HighlJnd
Ie In i Ie rs
mail order finns
wholesalers and distributors
fi n anc i at servi c es
business servic es
Isle of Wight
t'e t 3 i I ers
mail order funls
",.holesalers and distributors
flnancial services
busines~ services
1 nnles Cily
re t3 Hers
mail order fimlS
\\f ho I csa1ers an d d i sui b u I ors
financial services
bu s j ncss .~ el"\ot ic es
King and Queen
ret3i1ers
mail order fim1s
wholesalers. and distributors
fi nanci €LI sc rv ices
bu s ioess serv ic es
Tax Rale per SI00 or GrosS Receipts
none
none
none
none
none
(tone
none
none
none
none
~20
~20
$25 on the fiIst S 10.000 of gross purchases + .201S 1 00 on excesS up to
$5 mil. + .11/$100 0[\ the next SS mil, + .15/$'00 the nexl $20 mil. +
.05/$ tOO on excess over 530 m \1.
.36
~20
$10 on the first $SJ~JO + J 5/$100 on excess
$10 on the first 53.000 + .15J$100 on excess
.05 gross purchnses
$10 on lhe first S2JOO + 425/$ 100 on excesS
S lOon the first $3.COO + ..ISIS 100 on excess
none
none
none
none
none
.12
1'\ 0 rote prov ide d
.05 gross purch3ses
.36
.20
.20
.20
.05 gross purchases
.58
.36
none
none
none
none
none
8
00 075
FEB-24-92 MON 10:31
County
DEPiljF ECON DEVELOPMENT
FAX NO. ~3718185
Business License Tax In "Virginia's Counties and Cities (cont'd)
(Caltndilt Year 1991 or Tax Y~a.r 1991..92)
Type of
Business
Tax Rate per SIOO of Gross Recei,,~
P. 10
King George
King \\'Hi iam
L ancnster
Lee
Loudoun
Louisa
Lunenburg
M3dison
retailers
mail order flflllS
'Aj holesalers and di stributors
fi n aile j aI sc rv ice s
business services
gre,ater of $25 or . 10;S 100
grC3ler of S25 or ~ 1 Of) tOO
gre..1tcr of $25 or .05/$1 ()() or gross pure hases
grealer of $25 or ..1015 100
gre;tter of $25 or llOlSlOO
J e tail ers
",:u I order firnls
wholesalers and distri bUlors
fi n 3flC i at se rvi c e.,
bu si n ess serv ic es
none
none
none
none
none
retail e rS
n\ail order fi.rms
\\" ho I e S(.\ 1 e rs and d i S lri bu rOTS
fi n an c i at se rvi c es
business service~
none
none
none
none
none
re tai I ers
01 ai J order r LffilS
\\, ho 1 eSj le rs an d d i S Lr i but aes
fi nMe i aI se rvic es
business services
none
none
none
none
none
retailers
m ai I order fifnl S
~.holeS31ers and di sUi ~U(ors
financiaJ services
busines~ services
S lOon the first $50~OOO + .10/$100 on excess
S lOon the first $50,000 + . t 0/$1 00 on excess
$10 + .05/S 100 or gross pun: h3Ses
$10 on the firs~ S 10.000 + ..33/$100 on excess
S 10 on the first S lOtOOO + .16/$100 on excess
reLailcrs
mail order finns
',..,holes.alets nnd distributors
financial services
b u ~ iness s erv ices
none
none
none
none
none
retaile,rs
nl ail order !inns
"J ho I e ~'l1 e rs an d d i s tri but ors
Ii nanc i 3.1 sc r\d c c.s
business services
none
none
none
none
none
retailers
mail order firms
wholesalers and distrihulors
linancinl services
hu sin ess scrv ices
none
none
none
none
none
9
00 076
FEB-24-92 MON 10:32
DEP4IjF ECON DEVELOPMENT
FAX NO. ~3718185
County
Business License Tax In Virginia's Counties and Cities (coned)
(Cal~nd&r y~v 1991 Of Tax Y'tM 1991~92)
Type of
B u~iness
Tax Rate per ~ tOO of Gross Receipts
P. 11
MJ.lhe \1-/S
?\.teck len burg
M.i dd Ie sex
~1ontgonlery
Nelson
New Kent
North~mp~on
Northumberland
retailers
mail order fimls
who I esale r sand d i s lri bu lorg
financial service~
busines:s services
JO
.10
510
~ 10
.10
re In i1 ers
m a.j I order linn.,
who lcs:llers and d i stributorg
financial services
busine..,s services
none
none
none
none
none
re la i 1 ers
mai 1 order rums
whole Sri Ie r 5 and d is tri bu l 0 rs
financial services
bu si ne ss s erv it es
none
none
none
none
none
re tail e rS
n\ ai 1 order firm s
wholes.nlers a.nd distributors
fin anc iaJ service.~
bu si ness serv ices
none
none
none
none
none
relui lers
nla..il order finns
wholesalers and distributors
fi nanc i at scrv ic e s
bu s i ness serv ic es
none
none
none
none
none
rebilers
nlail order firms
\vholcsalers and disuibull)rS
finane ial services
busin ess serv ic es
.20
.20
~ 05 gro!;s. pun: hases
~58
.36
rc la.i I ers
mail order fi rots
wholesn lers and distributor s
fi n3flcial sentices
bu sin ess serv ic e s
none
none
none
none
none
re ti! i I crs
mail order fitrYt~
wholesalers an d disuibulors
fin ancial servi ces
bu s i ncss services
none
none
none
none
none
10
00 077
FEB-24-92 MON lU~33
COunty
iJ l:Y W' l: l; uN U l: Ii l: L U ~ 1"[ t I ~ I
t't"ii\ HU t U U Y j { 1 u 1 0 ~
It
Business License Tax in Virginia's Counties and Cities (cont'd)
(Calendar Yecv 1991 or Ta~ Year 1991..92)
Type of
B usine 55
Tax Rate per 5100 of GrosS Receipts
i t 1 L
Notlo,,'ay
(busjnesscs not
subject to a
nlerchantst
capital taX)
Orange
Page
Pauick
Pi tlsy I vania
Powhatan
P ri nc e Ed \vard
Pt) nee. George
re la i lets
n,ail order fi nns
wholCS4\lcrs and distributors
financial services
business setviccs
retaile~
m ai I order fimls
\\tholesalers and di~lribu(ors
financial service.s
bus i ness s erv ic e,c;
re tail e.rs
mail order rlnns
\V ho 1 e &:, 1 ers an d di stri b u tors
fi n anc ial services
bus i ness serv ic es
re-ta.t 1 ers
mail order finn s
\\~holes:ders and distributors
fi n anci a1 seNic es
bu s i neS$ servic es
re tail ers
mail order finns
wholes31ers nnd disll'ibutors
n n anc itll servi c es
bus i nes s serv ices
re la i1 er s
mail order rums
'V,'holcsa]ers and di stribulors
financial service~
b u si n ess serv ic e5
relA.ilers
mail order firms
wholesalers and distribUlors
financial services
b us loess serv ices
re l3 i J ers
mail order (1 rn' s
whoJcsarers and distributors
financial services
bu s i ne.ss serv ic e~
greater of $15 or .05/$ 100
.05 (n~tnil) or .0 15 (wholes~le)
~Ol S
& 15
J)9
none
none
none
none
none
none
none
none
none
none
none
none
none
none
none
none
none
none
none
none
$30 fee
$30 fee
$30 fee
$30 fee
$30 fee
none
none
nont.
none
none
~ 15
.15
none
~lS
.20
11
00 078
FEB-24-92 MON 10:33
DEP~F ECON DEVELOPt1ENT
FAX NO, 13'718185
County
Business License Tax in vlrglnia.s Counties and Cities (cont'd)
(C",rtndar Year 1991 at Tax Year 1991-92)
Type of
B usin~ss
Tax R~\te per S 100 of Gross Receipts
Pri nee Will iam
PuJa.~l<i
Rappahannock
Richmond
R03J1oke
Rockbridge
Roc k.i n g h am
Russell
relaile.rs
m ail order flnlls
who tesalers and d i slri bUlors
fi n3Jlcial services
bu 5 i ne ss serv ic e~
J7
.17
~05 gross purchaSts
~33
~21
retailers
mail order finns
wholesalers and d is tri h u tors
Ci n:me i ill servic.es
business services
none
none
none
none
none
re la. i t ers
mail order fi.T1l's
whoJesalers and distribulors
fi nan cj aJ servi ces
business services
none
none
none
none
none
re li.l i I en;
nlait order firms
wholesn..lers and distributors
financial services
business services
none
none
none
none
none
reta iJ ers
01 ail ord er fi on s
\vholesnlers and distributors
fi n Me i n.1 scrv ices
bus iness 5 erv ices
..20
620
~05 gross purchases
.50
~34
.13
.13
~OS gross purchases
~23
~23
re la i) ers
mail order linns
\vholes.alers and dislribulOTS
fi n an ci aJ services
bu sine-ss services
re l3 i I ers
01 ail orde r firm s
\vhOleS3)crs and disui butors
fi n anc i al se ["\r ires
business services
none
none
none
none
none
retailers
m :li I ord~ r rirnls
wholesalers and distribotor~
financial services
bus in ess se rv ices
none
none
none
none
none
12
P. 13
00 079
FEB-24-92 MON 10:34
DEP'4!i ECON DEVELOPI'IENT
FAX NO. 81718185
County
Business License Tax In Vlrglnials Counties and Cities (conl'd)
(Calendar Year 1991 Of Tax Ytar 1991-92)
Type of
Business
l~tu R~te per SIOO of Gross Receipts
P. 14
SCOtl
Shrnanduah
SmYlh
Sou t hamplon
S pOLS)'lvani a
Sratford
Surry
Sussex
rc t.ailers
nlai I order r...nns
wholesalers and distrihutors
fin:mcl a) se rvices
business services
none
none
none
none
none
re L1iler s
mail order lions
\\'holes:llers and d istribul0r~
fi n noel at servi c es
businc~s services
none
none
none
none
none
re fa it ers
nlail order firms
wholesalers and distributors
fi n aIle ial sen; ces
business services
none
none
none
none
none
tetailc rs
nlail order finns
\l.1holeg.,.,lers and di~Di bulOr3
fi n anc i at se rv h:es
bu si n e.ss serv ices
none
none
none
grenter of $25 or ..58/$100
gr~ler of 520 or ~25/$lOO
S 30 on (he fi.rst S 50,000 .... 610/$100 on excess
$30 on the first $50,000 + ~ 10/5 100 on excess
greater of $30 or .025/$ 100 gloss purch3ses
$30 on the rust S50tOOO + ~29/$ tOO on e.xce~!l
$30 on the rusl $50.000 + .1 O/S 100 on excess
rc t3 il ers
Inail order finns
whole.~ 1ers a.nd dis lri bulors
flume i aJ se cvices
busine s s services
retailers
mn.il order fUlTl S
ON ho1t:s.nlers and distributors
finsnc.ial services
business services
none
none
none
none
none
re tai 1 ers
nl ai 1 order finns
wholesalers and distri bUlors
Ii nanc i nl se rvic es
b usi n e SS serv ic es
$25 on lhe first $1,000 + .151S 1 00 on excess
S25 on the first $1.000 + ..1 S/$] 00 on exce~s
~05 gross purchases
550
$30 on the first $20J)OO + ,,1S/SJ 00 on excess
rel4)i lers
nlail order rimls
wholcS3.1ers and distribulors
financial services
bus i ness serv ic. es
none
none
none
none
none
13
00 080
FEB-24-92 NON 10:34
DEP4IIf ECON DEVELOPMENT
FAX NO. ~718185
Pt 15
COunty
Business License Tax in Virginia's Counties and Cities (confd)
(C81~nda.r V tar 1991 or Tat YeN' 1991 ~92)
Type of
B usi ness
Tax R3te per $100 of Gross Re(eiplS
Tale \Ir' ell
\\0' arT en
Washington
We,st mo re 13 nd
'Yt'1se
Wylhe
York
~. ,
City
Alex nndria
felnil ers
mail order fUlllS
whotcsale.rs and distributors
fi n anc j n1 sc rv ices
business services
ret:.itcrs
nltU J order !inns
\\' ho 1 e sa Ie rs and d i su'i b ut or s
financial services
business services
retailers
nlajl order (inns
who] e ~lers and distributors
financial ~ervices
bu s iness serv ic es
re ta iJ ers
mail order {inns
whole sa lers and distributors
financial servjce~
business services
re tailers
olafl order fimHI
wholesaJers and di stribulors
financ ial services
busi ncs s serv ic es
felaiJers
mail order finns
wholcs...,lcrs and distributor s
floan c i 0.1 se rvic es
b usi n e ss scrv ices
reta Hers
n1ail order fimls
who 1 es..~ ler s and di s II i but or!
fi nanci at services
business serv ices
reUlilers
mail order finns
wholesalers and distribu10rs
financial servicc~
b U $ i ncss serv ie es
none
none
none
none
none
.12
& 12
.03 gross purchasr.~
&3S
.22
none
none
none
none
none
none
none
none
none
none
none
none
none
none
none
none
none
none
none
none
~20
.20
.05 gro~g pLlcchases
.58
&36
greater or 530 or &20/$.1 00
greater of $30 or .201S1 00
grtnter of $30 or .05/S I 00
greater of $30 or .58/$ 100
gre.J ler or S30 or .35/$100
14
00 081
FEB-24-92 MON 10:58
City
DEPT~ ECON DEVELOPMENT
p~ 02
FAX NO, 8ijj718185
Business License Tax in Virginia's Counties and Cities (cont'd)
(Calendar Yell 1990 or Illx Year 1990-91)
Type or
Busines!
Tax Rate per $100 of Gross Receipts
Bedford
Bristol
Buena Vista
C h 3I J ott es vi lie
Chesnpeake
Clifton Forge.
Colonial Heights
Ie L1.i Jers
mail order fiml S
"'1 ho 1 esa tees and d i $; lri but ors
fi n 31lC i aJ se rvic e s
bus i ncss s erv ic es
re lailers
nlail ord~.r rinns
\\' hotes\lers and di stributors
fi n anc laJ servi c eg
bu siness s erv ic. es
retflilers
mail order firms
\a.~holesolers and distributors
financi3..l services
business services
rc 1ai lers
nlaiJ order fUlns
,,'holesalers and distributors
fi n an ci aJ servi c es
bus i ne ss serv it es
re L:lilerS
mail order rums
wholesalers and distributors
finan c i at se rv ices
bu s iness serv ices
Ie t.a iI ers
m ail order firTrt~
\Ir'ho) es.1lers and di s tri butors
financial services
bu s i ness serv ic e.s
re t3 j I ers
mail order firms
\\' ho r esa 1 ers an d d i sui b ul oes
financiul set'\'ices
busines~ services
$10 on the first S 8 JX)O + ~ t 25/$ 100 on excess
S 10 on lhe nrsl $4,lXXJ + a251S 100 on excess
SZS + .10/S 100 grosg pwchnses
$25 on the first $5.000 T .501S 100 on excess
$10 on lhe firsl $4,COO + .2S1S100 on excess
greater of S30 or .20/S loo
gre.1ler of $30 or .20/S 100
$25 + .25/$ 100 on the flJ'st 5500,,000 gross purchases + ~20/S 100 on the
nexl $500.000 + .15/S 100 on the next 51 mil. + ~10/S100 on excess over
S 2 nliI.
.20
greater of $30 or .20/$ 100
greater of $30 or .20;$100
retailers ta.xed at relai! rute on gross recei plS. wholesalers at ~'holesalcrs
ra re 0 n gros S purchases..
$ 30 on 1 he fir st S 30.000 gross P ute h ases + .20/$ 100 on ex cess
gre:.\ter of 530 or .581S 100
greater of 530 or ,36/$ 100
S25 on first S2.(x)() + ~201S"1 00 on excess
$25 0" fitSl 52.000 + ,,20/S100 on excess
$SO of [lIst S 10.000 gross purchases + ~25rs 100 on next 540,000 +
. 16/5100 on ex cess over $ 50 I COO
grenter of 530 or .36/S 100
greater of 530 or ..36/$ 100
gre."lter of 530 or .20;1100
greiltcr or S30 or .201S I ()(J
S50 on first $10~OOO gross purchases..... .12/S tOO on excess
del)ending on type~ license taX of $30 or .58/S 100 on the rust S 1 miL +
.12/$100 on excess )
.36 on the flfSt $SOOJXX) + ..30/$ 100 on excess
.20
none.
.25
~58
.36
.15
no role provided
$20 on first SlOJX)O gross purch3.~es + .11/$ 100 on the next 5240.000
+ .03/S 100 on excess over $250.000
.S7
625
15
00 082
FEB-24-92 MON 10~58
DE~F ECON DEVELOPMENT
Pt 03
FAX NO. ~3718185
Business license Tax in Virginia's Counties and Cities (con"d)
(Calendar VC:al 1990 or Tax Y ~ar 1990-91)
City
Type of
Bu~iness
Tax Rate per $100 of Gross Receipr.s
Covington
r~ta tiers
nl ai I order finn s
whole~(lcrs and di sl1ibulors
fi n3nC i a1 serv ic es
bu 5 i ness serv ic es
Dnn vUle
Ie ta i.t crs
mail order firtns
\\'hoJe~le rs and d i su-i hlltors
fi nan c i al se rvie es
business services
EOlporia
re U1 iI ers
nl ail order fi em s
,,'holeSJlers and distributors
fi n ane j at se rvices
bu sin e sg, serviceg
Fa irrax
re la iJ er~
maj 1 order firms
\\'ho)e~~l~rs and dislributors
finnnci at services
busi ness ~ervices
Fans Church
re tn it ers
n1 ai I order fi ml J
who I esal e rs an d d i Slri b 1I tors
Ii nancial $ervice~
b u si neSS sc rv ices
Frankl in
retailers
mail order rums
who 1 e sa 1 e rs and d i s tri b u tors
financial services
bus i neS5 serv ices
Frederic ks bur g
r e ta it efS
m ni lord er fimls
who leu1 ers tin d di s rri b ut 0 rs
financi aI services
busines~ services
Ga1:lx
re {a i I ers
maH oJder fimls
\At' ho I c s...~ 1 e rs an d d i s tri b U lors
financial services
bu s i ne~s serv ic es
.20
..36
,12
.58
.36
.20
none
.15 gross purch~ls~S
~20
.36
.20/S 100 on lhe rust $600.000 . .1 5/$100 on excess
none
no rale provided
.55
~3.5
greater or $30 or .20/$100
gredler of 530 or .20/$100
grealer of 530 or ~05/S 100
grt.:lter or S30 or ~401S 100
gre..1ter of $30 or .27/$100
.19
.35
~ 08 gross pu rc h 3ses
.54
..35
$20 on fllS( S2tOOO + .29/S100 on excess
S 30 on rust $3.000 ... .4 4J$1 00 on excess
550 on first SlOJK)O gross purchases + .10IS lOO on e.xce.ss
530 on first $3,000 + .74/S 100 on excess
$ 30 on rust 53 ~(X)O + ..44/$ 100 on excess
gr~ler of 530 or .20/$100
greater of $30 or .20/$ 1 00
g rea I er 0 r $ 30 or .05/$ 1 00 gros s p urc h:l.~cS
greater of $30 or .461S J 00
gre3ter of $30 01 .361' 100
grC.3ler 0 r 530 or .20/$ 100
grcJter of S30 or ~20J$1 00
SSO on (he firs( $10.000 + .175/5.100 on excess
no rate provided
greater of 530 or .201S 100
16
00 083~
FAX NO. ~718185
P. 04
FEB-24-92 MON 10:59
DEPtlif ECON DEVELOPMENT
Business License Tax in Virginia's Counties and Cities (cont'd)
(CaJendar YeM ~ i90 or Tal Ye31 1990..91)
City
Type of
Business
Tax Rate pet 5100 or Gross Re(eiplS
Hnnlplon
re "'1. iI ers
mn..it order fimls
v,'holt$31ers and disuibutors
fi n an c i 301 sc rvi c es
bu siness seJVice~
H:lIT 'so n h u r g
re13i1ers
m 3i 1 order rums
wholesalers and dislri b"-ltors
fi n ane i al services
bu s i ness s ef\o' ices.
Hopewell
re ta iI ers
m:li I order fim)s
\vho\e~11er$ and d j stf.butor~
fi n anc i n1 sc rvi c es
bu ~ i ness set''\dc e s
Lexington
re la.i lers
",ail order firms
whoteS-t'llers and di~tributors
financial services
busine ss serv ices
Lynchburg
retailers
mml order run)S
wholcSfllcrs and distributors
financial services
husiness services
Man 3.) ~ as
re (3 iJ ers
nlail order flIms
wholesnters and di suibutors
fi nanc i aJ servi ces
business services
Man3.Ssas Park
relailers
mail order finns
'fttho1esnle.rs and di~lfibutors
fi nar' c i at servi c cs
bu sin ess serv ic es
Marti os ville
reLa..ilers
nl ai I orc.1er fi nnS
who I c ~11 ers an d d is tri but or s
financial services
business services
gre:tler of $30 or .20/$ 100 on firsl S200.000 + .24/S100 on the next
$39~8 mil.
gr~'!er of $30 or ~39!$lOO
$50 on first S lOJ>OO gross purchases + .15,1$ 100 on excess
no ratc plovided
gre!iler of 530 or .411$100
~20
~20
~ 17 810ss purchases
..58
no tale provided
gr~ler of S30 or ~201S tOO
no nle provided
grt<1ter of $100 or .25/S 100 grosS purchases
greater of $30 or 4581$100
gre3ler of 530 or A361S 100
gre~ller of 530 or .20/$ 100
retailers at retail role on gross receipts, wholesalers nt "rhole.s31e late on
gross pure h ases
~ 05 gross p u rch 3ses
greater of $30 or lS8/S 100
greater of 530 or ~361S 100
grr.ater of $:30 or ~20JS 100
gre~ler of 530 or .20/$100 on 111e fltst $20 mil. + .OSIS tOO on the next
$20 mil. + ~OllS 100 00 excess over $40 miL
g r ec1 ter of S 3 0 or t28J$100 g tOSS pure ha.~~
greater of 530 or ~S8/S 1 00
greater of S30 or ~36JS 100
gr(l.ater of $30 or ~ IOIS 100
greater of 530 or .10/$100
525 on the first SIO,ooo ... ~ 10/S1.00 on excess
gre.ater of 530 or ~351S 100
gr~ter or $30 or .22/$100
.15
none
~05 gross purchases
,18
~18
~20
retailers at rew.i1 rale on grOSS receipts, wholesalers at wholesale rale on
gross purchases
.05 gross pur,h~ses
~20
.36
17
00 084
FEB-24-92 MON 11:00
DEPT. ECON DEVELOPt1ENT
FAX NO. 8~718185
PI us
Business Ucense Tax in Virginia's Counties and Cities (collt'd)
(C.lendar Year 1990 or Tax year 1990-91)
City
Type or
Business
Tax Rate per SI00 or Gross Receipts
N~\\'port News
relail c rs
mail order fino $
\\'hole~llers and dislributors
Ii nanci 31 servic es
business se rv ice.s
Norfolk
Ie tai Jers
mail order firms
whole~lers and d istribulors
fi n3nci al se rvi ces
business services
Norton
retailers
mail order firms
~. ho 1 c s.nl e rs nnd d i s tri b u l 0 rs
Ii nMcinl services
bu si ness s erv ic es
Petersburg
re 1.3 il ers
mail order firms
wholesalers and distributors
finane i at services
business serv ice..C\
Poq 1I0S0 n
reta Hers
m a.i I order (inn s
"'he le~ lers and di sUi bu(ors
fi n ane i at se rvices
bus iness services
PoC1smoulh
re t3 it ers
n13il order f1ffns
whole~ers and distributors
financial services
business servic es
Radford
te13Hers
olail order finns
wholesnlers and distributors
fin~nci~ ~e.rvices
business services
Richmond
rCl3.i lees
mail order firms
wholesalers and distributors
n n anC i at servi ces
bu si ncss serv ices
S39 on the first $3JXlO + .35/$ 100 on e~cess
nO rnle provided
$50 on the first $10JXXl gfoss purchases + .20/$100 on e,-cess
no r:lle provided
$39 on the first S3JXJO + ..401S 100 on excess
.20
.20
S50 + .15/S 1 00 gro~s purchases
.58
.36
&20
no rate provided
.2S on the flfst $1 nlit gross purchases + .OSf$lOO on excess
.50
.,36
.24
.32
$35 on Ihe rust $4.000 gross purchaseS + .25/$100 on the nCltl S96,OOO
.,. .15/$100 on che next $100,000 + .lOlSlOO on excess over $200,000
$ 5 00 on the firs l S 50 lOOO + .501S 100 on excess
.32
gre3ter of S30 or .151$ 100
no rate provided
.05 groSS purchnses
greater of 530 or ~30!$lOO
grealer of S30 or ..301S 100
$50 on the firSl $SJXJO + .20/$ 100 on excess
$50 on the rust 55.(x)() + ~ 20/$100 on excess
S50 on the firSI SSJX>O gross purchases + .1515100 on excess
$50 on the first $5,000 + ~59/$lOO on e,;:cess
$50 on the fU'st $5.000 + ~361S 100 on excess
.135
no rat e provided
,068 gross pure h ascs
.365
~ 14
.375
.375
.22 grosg pUrCh3Se5
no nlte provided
~58
18
- 00 085\
FEB-24-92 MON 11:00
City
DEP.F ECON DEVELOPI-1ENT
FAX NO. ~3718185
P. U6
Business LicenSe Tax in Virginia's Counties and Cities (cont'd)
(Ca)~nda1 Yetu' 1990 or 1a.x Ye Sf 1990~9 t)
Type of
Business
Tax Rote per SIOO of Gross Receipt')
Roanoke
S 31cm
South Boston
S l:lunlOn
Surfolk
Virginia Brach
v..' aynesboro
William shutS
Ie tail ers
m a.i I 0 rdcr fiml S
\\'ho1e$.3'ers and distributors
fi n 3JlC i al s e rvir. es
bu s i ness scrv ices
re In H er~
mail ord er fl nn!;
who 1 e 5..11e rs and di s tri b uf ors
fi n we inl servi c es
business services
rc tai 1 ers
mail order !inns
wholesnlers and dislributors
fi n Jncit1l servic es
h u.s i ness serv ices
re tail ers
mSliI order {imls
who1eS31crg and distributors
fi n:lJ1 c i aJ s e. rvi c es
b u si ness serv ices
re In iI er s
mail order firms
wholesalers and dislributors
finanet nl servic es
business services
Ie III i I ers
mail order rimls
w holesa]ers and distributors
financinJ services
bu s i ncss serv ic es
rc lai 1 ers
mail order firm~
~f ho le~lers and distribulors
fin:mcial sCf\lices
business services
re ta i I e r~
mail orde.r finns
\\'ho) e~1lcrs nnd di st1ibut()r$
financial services
business scrv ices
.20
.20 on the first $20 mil. + _05/S100 on the next $20 miL + .01/$100 on
excess over $40 mil.
$44 + .26/S 1 00 gross purchases
~58
.36
.20
~20
.13 gross purchases
.20
.36
.20
no rate provided
.20 gross purchases
.5&
.36
.20
.20
~ 100 on lhe rust $10.000 gross purchases + .50 on the next $40.000 +
~ 12/$ 100 on ex cess over S 50 t ())()
.40
.36
grenter of $30 or ~201S 100
.09 on the rust $25 rnil~
gfe:1ter of 550 or .09/5 100 gross purchases
greater of $30 or ..58/$ tOO
greater of $30 or .581S 100
..20
grc.aler or $30 or .20 on the first $40 mil. +- .lOlS100 on the nexl $20
mil. + .05/S100 on the next $40 mil. + .02~/S 100 on excess over 5100
milt
112 gross putchn ~es
gr~ter of $30 or .361$.l 00
no rate provided
greater of $30 or .201S 100
gre~'er of $30 or .20/$100
$ 50 + . 15/S 100 gross pure hJses
.58
~36
~20
920
.05
~58
..36
19
00 086.
FEB-24-92 MON 11:01
DEPlIIf ECON DEVELOPMENT
FAX NO. 841j718185
P. 07
Business License Tax In Virginia's Counties and Cities (cont'd)
(CaJendar Year 1990 Of Tax Year 1990.91)
City
Type of
Business
Tax Rate per $100 of Gross ReceiplS
Wine he SI cr
rclailers
mail order finn s
wholesalers and dislributors
fi n :lnci at services
business services
greater of $30 or .20/$100
gre3ter of 530 or ~25!$1 00
$50 on lhe firSl $10.000 gross purch3Ses + ~20J$100 on excess
.58
~25
Source;
In July 1991, the Virginia Department of Economic Development sent a (aJ( ql.lcsuo0rl3ire LO the Commissioner of
the Re...enue, Direclor of Finance. or Su~(Visor of Assessments in each counly and ciry in lhe State. Their
comment.~ on how business license taxes are imposed in lheir localities are summarized in this table.
20
00 087
FEB-24-92 MON 11 :01
DE~F ECON DEVELOPMENT
FAX NO. .3718185
PI 08
Memorandum
To:
From:
Dn Ie ~
Subject
Research Staff, rese-arch file, "Taxe.~: Merchants. Capitar-
Jo Ann M~ Draughn .~\" c>
December 24, 1991 j
Merchants' Capital TallO for Ihe calendar Year 1991 or tax year 1991-92
IMPORTANT NOTE: IF there are questiol\5 as 10 how an individual company wilt be classified and t.'\xcd
regarding a merch:mls' capital lax. the recommendation of the Department of E.conomic
Development (as advised by the Virginia Department of Taxation) is that ltle comp:lny
should contact the commissioner or the revenue of the locality{ics) in qucslion 31ld oblain
in writ in g how the conlpany VI QuId be ta.xed.
Localities may impose a 1.'\X on the capital of merchants. "Capital" is defined as inventory of stock on hand, certain
daily rental passenger c:\tS, ctnaifl daily rental property. and aU other taxable tangible personal property. Money
on hand and on deposit. and t.'\ngible personal property not offered for sale as merchandise are not considered capital.
Goods imported in foreign commerce are not subject to the mercha.nt~' ca.pital tax unol they lose their statu!: as
impons. This occurs when the package in .....hich they were shipped is opened. when the property has reached ils
second ph,ce of rest or storage after being unloaded or sold, or when such goods have been committed by the
importer to curren t 0 perati on nee.d oS.
Tax 11ltcs and assessment ralios may not be hill:her than those in effect on January I, 1978. Howev~r, bolh taX rotes
a.nd assessmenl mtios are penuiued 10 be ~ than those in effect on January 1. 1978. There are no guidelints
in the tax code reg~di.ng the q'leeific: valuation of merchants' capital other than the. conSlit\ltion31 requirement thaI
pc~ona.l property be assessed at "fair market value.ft However. this general valuation requirement doesn't make
much sen5e, per se, because of the difficulty of measuring Chi! value, and because there are, by defaull. several
allowable methods for valuing merchants' capil.3.l (Federal Corpornle Income Tax Form 1120 describes a1.lowable
methods for the vaJualillll 0( closing Inventory for fede i1l.llaX purposes). ThUll, commissioners of lhe revenue h3.'iC
much flexibility regarding lhe valuation method used in (heir respeclive localities. The situs for assessment and
taxation is the locality in which the propeJ1)' is phySically located on the locality's taX day (usually January 1),
FifLY-lhree of Virginia's 95 cow\lies impose a merchants' capilall.'\X. Of the remaining 42 counties whiCh do not
impose the merchant$' capit9.1tlU, 36 impose the business license tax: six counties impose neither the merchants'
capital taX llQ! the business license taX (Accomack. Bath. Halifax, Nelson (except conrractors), Rappahannock. and
Wa<;hinglon). None of Virginia's cities impose the merchants' capital tax. Rather. all 41 cities opr to impose [he
business license tal. whic.h is in lieu of a merch3J1l's capital tax. Thus. a locality may impose one or the other. or,
ne i lher of the tw 0 types 0 r taxes..
Most counties (45 of 53) use. original cost as the value used for the llSsessment of merchants' capital. The effective
lax nIle (on the first $100,000, 10 rake into account the four counties using multiple assessment percentages
dependini on the amount of capital) for !.he 4S counlies u~ing original cost varies from a low of $0,20/$ 100 to a high
of $1.55/$100. Counlies used a wide range of combinations of high nominal taX rate/low assessment r~lio to low
notninal tax rate/high assessn\ent ratio lO au.a.in the varying effective lax nlte~..
1
00 088
FEB-24-92 NON 11 :02
DEP~F ECON DEVELoPtlENT
FAX NO, 13718185
P. 09
Merchants' Capital Tax in Virglnia's Counties and Cities
(C~~nd~ Ve.ar 1991 or Tax Year 1991-92)
Effective Tax
Rate Per S 100
Tax Rate Value Used Assessment (Rates are not
County Per S 100 for Assessln ent Ratio Compamble · )
Ac co [J\ ac k none
AHxnlarle nOne
Alleghany none
Amelia none
Anthersl S 3.95 on gi n aJ cost 20 % S ,,79
Apl,onl3flox 1.00 original COSl 85 ~85
Arlinglon none
Augusta none
Balh none
B edf ord 2.20 (air market val ue 20 ..44
Bland .73 original cost 100 ~73
BoletOurt none
Brunswick 1.20 original cost 100 1.20
Buchanan 2.00 original cost 10 620
B uckinghD...ln l~OO original cost 100 IJ)O
Campbell I 3~15 original cost 33.3 1.05
Carol ine none
Cmoll 2.30 original cost 30 .69
ChJ11es City 1 2680 fai.r market value 100 2~80
Charlotte 3.20 fair market value 10 ,,32
Chcs terfi el d none
Clarke none
Craig 3.50 arigina.l cost 25 ~88
Culpeper 2.25 origi oat cost 40 .90
C u nl be rl an d none
Dickenson 10.50 ori gi n al cost .to l~OS
Oi nwiddie none
Essex 3~7S original cost (0 - SSO~CJC(1) 50 % 1688
(next $25.000) 25 "0 .94
(next S2SJ)OO) 10 0/0 ..38
(over 510011000) S 0/0 .19
Fairfax hone
Fauquier none
Floyd 3.50 original cost 15 ..53
Fluvanna J 1.55 original cost 100 1.55
Franklin 5.40 ori gi n 31 cost 20 1.08
F reder! ck nOlle
Gi les 4.80 on g~ n;J) coSt 25 1.20
010ucester none
Gooc.hland none
Gra)~son 6.70 original COSl 10 .67
2
00 089
FEB-24-92 NON 11:03
r A X NUl d U q J {. 1 () l(J ~
e
OE~F Ecut'j lJl: Vl:Lu~l-ltN I
~ ..
r'. i U
Merchants. Capital Tax in Virginia's Counties and Cities (cont'd)
(Ca1endu YeM 1991 or T A:t Y r.Ql 1991-9"2)
Tal Rale
County Per SI00
Greene none
Grccnsville none
H3li fax none
Hanover S 2.60
He nrico none
Henry none
Highland 1.00
Isle or Wi ght none
James City none
King and Quee-n ~65
King George none
Klng William 3.90
LMcaster 1.00
Lee 1.25
Loudoun none
Lo ui sa .65
Luncnburg 1.20
Madison 4630
Malhewg none
Mecklenburg 1.45
Middlesex 1.25
MontgOlnery 6~O5
Nelson none
New Kent ~one
Northampton 6.25
NOflhu nl berland 2&40
NOI to\vay non~
Orange 440
Page 1.50
Pa tric k 3.50
Pillsylvania 2~7S
PO\'1hatan none
Prince Ed"AtMd .70
Prince Geolge none
Prince William none
Puln.ski 4.80
Rappahannock none
Richmond 3.50
Value Used
for Asse ss men t
Assessment
Ratio
Effeclive Tax
Rale Per 5100
(R ales are not
Comparnble · )
on ginJl cost
10 0/0
$ ~26
on gin al c:(j~t 20 .20
origino..l cost 100 .6S
on ginal cost 20 '.78
original cost 100 lJ>O
f:'lir nlD.1 ket value 30 ~38
0'; gin:J.l cost 100 .65
on gi oat cost 40 ..4B
original cost 20 .86
original cost 50 ..73
original cost 35 .44
origlnal cost 20 1.21
fair market value 10 ..63
ori gi nal co st SO 1~20
original cost 100 ~40
on ginal COSl 20 ..30
original cost 30 1.05
ori gl n 31 cost 30 .83
ori g i Tl n.I cosl 100 ~70
originnJ cost
(0 · S300JX)()) 22 %
(over $300.000) 5 %
(0 .. $ 25 J)()J) 50 '10
(next S25~OOO) 30 %
(next 550,(0)) 20 0/0
(over $100,000) 10 0/0
1.06
1024
1675
1.05
~70
~3S
on gi n aJ cost
3
00 090
FEB-24-92 MON 11:03
DEP4IjF ECON DEVELOPMENT
FAX NO. ~3718185
P. 11
. -N".:j
MerChantsl Capital Tax In virgInia's CounUes and Cities (conl'd)
(Calendar y ~v 1991 or ra~ Year 1991-92)
Tax Rate
County Per S tOO
Roanoke none
Rockbridge none
Rockingham S .81
R u~~cU 5.75
Scott .72
Shcnlndoah .60
SmyLh .60
Soulh3mpton .50
Spolsylvania none
Stafford .50
Surry none
S usse ~ 1.00
Tal,ewcU .. 4.30
Warren none
Washington none
,"' est n lOr C 1 and .50
\V ise · 2.RS
Wythe .56
YOlk nont
Value Used
(or Assessment
Assessment
Ratio
Effective Tax
Rnte Pet S 100
(Rates are not
Con\ parab Ie · )
fair market value 66 % S ..53
fail market value 20 1.15
original cost 100 .72
~rigjna.1 '"ost tOO ~OO
original cost 100 .(1)
original cost 100 .50
original cost 100 .so
original cost 100 - 1.00
angi nal cost 20 .86
100
(0-S300.ooo) 45 70
(next S 100,000) 3S 0/0
(excess over S400.cK)O) 2S 0/0
(nit market value 100
.50
1.28
1.00
A1t
&56
ori gi n at cost
originJ.l cost
The erre(tive tax rale (or e.3ch county was computed by multiplying the assessment ratio by the nominal
ta,;; mte. There. do not (!ltist specific p-uideliMs regarding the valuation or merchants' capital. Current
n\cthods are based on both original total cspit.'llized cosl and the depreciated (appreciated) cost (book value).
Because the relationship belween Ute (Wo methods of valuing merchants' capital vane!!. comp~lrisQns of
effective tax rates are valid Only Rnlong localities using Ihe s..1.Jlle assessment value nlethod~
Thb locality aho impOses a merch::mls' capibl ta.~ or daily rental pa~genger CaIS and short lenn rental items.
This locl'liity also impOses a merchOOLS' capit."ll tax on accounlS receivable less accounlS paynble.
This locality aha imposes a merchants' capital t.'\X on Lhe pa)'able compensation to licensed sales agents
of lolttry tickets.
This locality also ilnposes a nlcrchants. c~piL3l l~ on daily rental equipment
Source: In July 1991. lhe Virginia Department of Economic Developmenl senl a tlX questionnaire 10 the
Commissioner of !lIe Reveolle. Direclor of Fil1:1flce. or Superviwr of Assessments in each county and r:ily
in the Stale. Their comments on how mcrchant's capital is tnxed in their localities are SlJmmariz,ed in this
tab 1 e ,
4
00 091
805-9891
&- k, 1/.,
1
.; '.~
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
MEETING DATE:
March 11, 1992
(
; 6.E.4.
ITEM NUMBER~
SU8JECT ~.
Set Public Hearing to Consider Amendment to Zoning
Ordinance. Relative to Existing Mobile Homes
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR' 5 COMMENTS:
Re.Gq~
A~ ~1. {en ~ 4~.
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
BACKGROUND:
The attached amendment. would allow the Bo-ard of Supervisors to
.. consider appl'ications for permits .for existing mobile homes in
.. Busi-ness -. and Manufacturing' zoning --tii.s.t.r.icts .~~::.,!,...~This,. will permi t
. the owners of mobile homes located in these. districtOt pri'or. to
January 1, 1992, to file mobile homes applications under Chapter
21 .(the old Zqning Ordinance), rather than having to first rezone
the'property to a.new zoning-district under. Chapter 21~1 ,(the new
- . Zoning Ordinance).
'-When the new zoning ord'inance- - for. commercial. and industrial
development was adopted in 1989, the Board, at that time, did not
change the .status of previously zoned. business and .manufacturing
,., .property. Therefore,' a "dual" zo.ning ordinance'- current.ly exists.
The Board, however<,- did adopt st:rict ..rules to encourage property
- owners, to rezone to the new zoning' districts with modern
development~standards.
PREPARED BY~
Thomas E. Jacob
Director of Planning
ATTACHMENTS: YES II
NO [J
SIGNAT URE ;
~
COUNTY ADM I NI STRATOR
4MAR1192/A:AGENDAZ/gok
00 092
e
e
. \'"
~\
-- \ AGENDA ITEM
~SET.PUBLIC HEARING RELATIVE TO EXISTING MOBILE HOMES
-,.. "MARCH 11, 1992
PAGE 2
This amendment would not obligate the Board to approve any
particular request. The Board would still advertise each
request, hold-public hearings and retain the right to approve or
deny requests on a case by case basis.
On. February 18~, 1992 , the Planning Commission held a public
hearing~.- on .t.he-'.-..proposed amendment and recommend adoption,. of the
proposed ordinance-amendment.
RECOMM:ENDATION:
Sta.ff reconunend t.he <"Board. o.f -supe+r-vi.sors set April 22, 1992, for
a -public hearing to consider. the proposed ordinance amendment
relative to~ mobile -homes ~~.in ~~.B~'and.. M ...za,ni.ng .districts.
-4MAR1192/A:AGENDAZ/gok
00 093
e
.
; ~
.'
AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE ORDINANCE ADOPTED
APRIL 12, 1989 ENACTING CHAPTER 21.1 AND AMENDING
CHAPTER 21 OF THE CODE OF THE COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD1
1978, AS AMENDED, BY AMENDING AND REENACTING
SECTIONS l(B), l(C), AND 2 OF SUCH ORDINANCE
RELATING TO THE LAND USE APPLICATIONS TO
WHICH CHAPTERS 21.1 AND 21, RESPECTIVELY, APPLY
BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of
Chesterfield County:
(1) That the ordinance adopted April 12, 1989 enacting
Chapter 21. 1 and amending Chapter 21 of the Code of the
County of Chesterfield, 1978, as amended, is amended and
reenacted to read as follows:
(1) That the Code of the County of Chesterfield,
1978, as amended, is amended and reenacted as follows:
A. Chapter 21.1 is hereby adopted as follows:
B.---P~e~e~~Y-fe~-wn~eh-e-~e2onifi~-a~~~~ea~fen-is
f:t:3:eel - wi-eft - ~fte - eOttft-ey - afi:e~ - Ap~~r - i2, - 3:969, - 8het3:j: - },e
~eve~Red-by-~he-~~ev~~~On-ef-ena~~e~-r~~~.
trt--~ha~-ehap~er-zx7~-9fta~~-he-effee~ive-en-A~~~~
3:r,-3:989-:
000
Be Chapter 21 is hereby amended and reenacted as
follows:
000
c. Property for which a rezoning application is
filed with the County after -ehe - effee-e:i:ve - eiai:e - ef - efi:i:s
oreifiaHee April 12, 1989, shall be governed by the
provision.e. of Chapter 21. 1; provided, however, that
applications for permits for mobile homes existinq
continuously in the same location in B or M zoning districts
since on or before Januarv 1, 1992 I shall be qoverned bv
Chapter 21.
D. All property zoned 0, B or M on the effective
date of this ordinance, or after such date if a rezoning
application was filed with the County prior to the effective
date of this ordinance, may be developed in accordance with
Chapter 21.
(2) That this ordinance shall be effective on ~fte
daee-ef-aae~e~e8-~y-~he-Boa~d-ef-SH~e~v~~e~~ April 12. 1989.
(2) That this ordinance shall be effective on the date
of its adoption by the Board of Supervisors.
0705:291a.txt
1/28/92
- 1 -
00 094
~ ""
'of
(P.E.5~
... I
r~ , ~~.
'1J, ,
J
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVI SORS
AGENDA
, MEET ING DATE :
March 11, 1992
ITEM NUMBER;
6.E.5.
SUBJECT:
Refer to the Planning Commission for a Public Hearing to
Consider Amending Article III, Division 2, of the Code of
the County of Chesterfield, 1978, as amended, Relating to
Procedure for Designating Historic Districts
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR' 5 COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
The procedure for. designation of historic districts allows
applications for the creation of a district to be filed by sixty
(60) percent of the owners of all buildings within the proposed
district. This procedure does not allow owners of unimproved
parcels in the proposed district from having any input in the
designation process. Once a property is designated historic, there
are certain development restrictions that are imposed. Therefore,
the Preservation Committee believes that owners of parcels should
be able to participate in the process and adopted a resolution on
February 11, 1992 to request the proposed amendment. The amendment
would require a greater consensus of property owners before the
citizens affected by a district could apply for a designation.
PREPARED BY~~' -~
Steven L. Mi'cas
County Attorney
ATTACHMENTS: YES If
NO []
0600:83.1
SIGNATURE:
COU~~N'STRATOR
00
BOS-9891
II
, J I
e
e
';1-:" A
'. .
AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND ARTICLE III, DIVISION 2, OF THE
CODE OF THE COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD, 1978, AS AMENDED,
RELATING TO HISTORIC DISTRICTS AND LANDMARKS
BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of
Chesterfield County:
( 1 ) Tha t
Chesterfield,
follows:
Section
1978, as
21.1-26 of the Code
amended, is amended
of the County of
and reenacted as
Section 21.1-26. Procedure for desiqnation an historic district,
landmarks and landmark sites.
Applications for the creation of an historic district, or the
designation of landmarks and landmark sites shall be filed with the
director of planning, by the planning commission, board of
supervisors, the owner, contract purchaser with the owner's written
consent, the owner's agent or sixty (60) percent of the owners of
all buildings parcels within a proposed historic district. The
application shall be in such form and contain such information as
shall be prescribed by the director of planning. The board of
supervisors may establish application fees in order to defray the
cost of application review.
0600:84.1
00 096
(P · E f (n
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPE RV I SORS
AGE NDA
MEETING DATE: March 11, 1992
ITEM NUMBER ~
6.E.6.
SUBJECT;
Authorization of Ad Announcing April 1, 1992 Public
Hearing on FY93 Proposed Budget.
COUNTY ADMINISTRATORf S COMMENTS:
R~ /I-~ov-o/
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
Public hearings are planned for April 1, 1992 on the following (the
Code of Virginia requires that the hearings be held at different
times but can be held on the same day.):
o Tax Rates 7:00 P.M.
o Other Fee Ordinance Changes 7:10 P.M.
o FY93 Proposed Budget 7:20 P.M.
o Capital Improvements Program 7:30 P.M.
Tax Rates:
The Board approved the advertisement for the tax rates at their
February 26, 1992 meeting.
Fee changes:
The FY93 Budget is based in part on a number of fee changes which
require public hearings. The following proposed fee changes require
changes in County ordinances, and therefore must be advertised for
public hearing:
PREPARED BY~
ATTACHMENTS: YES f(
NO D
B0131/BOS #4
SIGNATURE;
~
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
00 09
808-9891
e
e
The Board of supervisors Agenda Item
Re: Authorization Ad Announcing April I, 1992 Public Hearing on
FY93 Proposed Budget.
March 11, 1992
Page 2
Fee Chanqes (Continued):
1. Zoning and SUbdivision Application Fees. Attachment 1
provides an explanation of proposed changes in these fees.
2 . Building Permi t Fees. Building Permit Fees last underwent
major revision in 1988. In order to cover the costs of
procedural changes being made to improve service, and to
bring fees in line with other cost changes occurring over the
past five years, a number of adjustments are proposed. For a
typical 2000 square foot home, the fee will increase 39% from
$199 to $276. Fees for commercial construction would
increase approximately 6.4%. More detailed information on
Building Permit fees will be delivered to the Board at the
next Board meeting.
3. utilities. A minor change is proposed for wastewater
customers who are not on the County water system. The change
would allow the current monthly charge to be prorated on a
daily basis. The typical monthly bill'will not change.
4. Treasurer Delinquent Tax Collection Charges. This ordinance
change will revise the administrative fee charged for filing
a warrant, before legal judgement is declared, from $10 to
$15 and for filing a warrant after legal judgement is
declared from $15 to $25.
Treasurer Returned Check Charges. This ordinance change will
revise the administrative fee charged for a returned check
from $20 to $25.
FY93 Budget:
The total FY93 Proposed Budget will equal approximately $430,004,400
for all funds. Attachment 2 provides a breakdown of this amount by
fund.
Caoital Improvement Proqram:
The County and utility Capital Improvement Programs will be
presented to the Board on April I, 1992 . A summary is attached.
See Attachment 3.
. B0131/Bos#4
00 098
e
p.TTAerENT 1
March 11, 1992
Set Public Hearing to Consider Revised Zoning and
Subdivision Application Fees.
BACKGROUND:
On January 22, 1992, the Board of Supervisors referred to the
Planning Commission the attached fee schedule for a public
hearing and recommendation. The Planning Commission held a
public hearing on February 27, 1992, and will hold a work session
and another public hearing on March 19, 1992. Following the
public hearing on March 19 1992 , the Planning commission will
forward their recommendation to the Board.
The Planning Department has conducted a study of the cost to the
Department of reviewing and managing zoning and subdivision
applications. Significant findings of this study were:
o Current fees do not cover the Planning Department's
cost of reviewing development applications.
o Current rezoning and other development fees are
estimated to generate $438,000 for the 1992-93 Budget
Year. Planning Department direct development review
costs are estimated to be $943,400.
o There has been a substantial increase in work involved
in zoning type requests wi th complex issues and/ or
controver'sy.
o Public involvement in the development review process
has significantly increased. The cost of public
involvement is estimated to be 30-35% of the total
review cost.
o The cost to review a small case generally exceeds the
fees charged; larger scale rezoning request revenues
exceeded costs.
o Administrative requests can be processed for less cost
than cases involving public hearings (i.e., the average
cost for reviewing commercial and industrial site
plans I which often involve complex design issues, is
$1,160 compared to $1,236 for an average single mobile
home permit. Over $500 of the cost of the mobile home
case is associated with the cost of the pUblic
hearing) .
See attached table which details the current fee, estimated
department review cost, and the proposed fee amendments.
00 099.
e
e
AT'rACHt1EI'JT 1
The last major revision to the County zoning and subdivision fee
schedule was in 1987.
RECOMMENDATION:
Planning staff recommends the Board set April 1, 1992 for a
public hearing to consider the attached zoning and. subdivision
application fee schedule ordinance amendment.
ATTACHMENTS:
Fee Restructuring Proposal
Ordinance Amendment
Budaet and Manaqement Comments
The Department of Planning has recommended a revised fee structure
and an activity level for FY93 that will generate approximately
$731, 000 in revenue. Budget and Management has worked with
Planning Department staff to calculate the estimated cost incurred
for each functional area related to the development review process
for FY93. The analysis illustrates that the total projected cost
for development review during FY93 will exceed the revenue
estimated by approximately $210 ,000 and this difference may be
larger if anticipated activity levels are not achieved. The
calculation captures only those direct costs incurred by the
Planning Department and does not allocate costs incurred by other
departments such as Transportation I Environmental Engineering,
Fire, and Budget which are supported by the general fund. If these
costs were allocated, the cost versus revenue gap would increase
further.
The Planning Commission is currently reviewing the revised fee
structure and is to decide on the fee issue at the Commission's
March 19, 1992 meeting.
At this time, the Board of supervisors"may elect to advertise the
revised fees as recommended by the Planning Department. After
review of the Planning Commission's recommendation, further
revisions to the fees can be made as long as the advertised fees
are not exceeded.
00 100
CI)
(2)
~
c
Q)
>
CD
a::
-c
c:
<C
rn
...
en
o
o
....
c:
Q)
E
...
I-
m
c.
aJ
C
OJ
c:
-2
1.=
co
~
e
e
ATTACHr.1ENT 1
==
G
>
G
a:
.!:
.! ~
..... 0
fII ca ~
; ~ 0
G -a ~
~ g ~ ~
~cn~N
(D co CJ en
... CJ) .!!- >
c;-e1L
o 0) c..-g
o c :e:::: IU
0.. ~ ~ _
o ... CD
o.E~>
~"i~u..
.... 0 0 0'"
~.! ~G)
~g~G:
i
u
..-
c
.
E
c:L
o
""i
>
II)
Q
G
::::J
c:
G
>
G
a:
.
II
U.
""
to
CD
o
D..
o
Q:
G
'"3
""CI
G
J:.
U
en
.
::l
s::
.
:-
c
a:
a-
t:
.w
CD
'.
w
l3
...
C
G
E
....
..
a
Q.
u
Q
"i
..,.
o
t-
O
..
o
u..
...
.
o
(J
II
1m)
Q
o
o
o
o
=
o
o
o
o
o
~
.....
.q)o
c-
O
o
o
o
~
.....
0(#
o
o
o
o
o
N
o
o
o
d
o
~
~
..
Q
o
o
0"
o
Q)
in'
o
o
o
o
o
CD
-f,I)
Q
C
o
C
o
"It
0-
C)
o
o
c'
o
N
..
....
-<no
.....
-v:r
o
..
M-
en.
>
u..
N
'"
>
u.
....
G)
>
.....
o
en
>
I!.
o
G)
CO
>-
u..
Q'j
CD
>
u..
CD
....
~
::::lI
o
E
-<
"'C
G)
......
o
4)
'0
....
D-
~
<
M
0)
>
u..
"'0
c:
GJ
N
m
>
l.L
o
LL
<t>
.r;
:c
~
'ij
>
<C
o
Z
en
CO
"0
C
ca
Q)
to
>
LL
o
u..
~
o
o
U
~
II)
'5
o
u:
...,
c:
D
E
Q.
o
"ii
>
II)
a
lD
o
z
00 ..101
~ I ~
e
e
ATTACHMENT 1
<uo-.....
~oo H
ONU1 en
CU . ..j,..J
I:f.] --.... ~ N 1.H
~ I.l'1 filM tU
~ ...::r ~~aJ 0
~ ~ .....-4 $...I tJ1
4-I~ aJ = = = = = = 0
~ + ~..c: -
OJ cQ+J N
en 0 ~ -6A-
a tt"\ Ul ~
Pol 0 cu oJ
0 ~ ,... ~ ~
p:; N 0 0 rJ
p.. ~4-f (tS a3
Q)O........
)..&00 ~
CJN1.t1 OJ
~ ctt .~
.........+JN4-t
E--J 111 Q1N as
~~~ ~ ~-ER--Q) 0
~ .,-t ,... Lf)
HHEo-+ 4-of~ <11 = = = = = = 0
E-+:>CI] + c..c ---
tI1~a Q) CO.;.J ~
e::J~U o~ .fA-
~ \/'l-t.-J UJ ..
< a a) al
CI) ... l-i ~ ~
0 C"I 0 CJ CJ
0... -fR- ~ ca ~
0
~
c..
~ ~
z (J
H ~
p:: ~
~ <U en .j.J
~ $4 en
U m cD aJ (J Q) cD CJ cD ..,...
::J '-i J,.., ~ (t3 ;... ~ <<J ,... ~
a::: CJ a {J .......... 0 t"J ""'""" CJ
~ en co ~ ctt Ll1 ctJ to tn as ,....
CI] ~ ~ .......... ........... '0 -..... -..... \Q ......... 0
~ Ot.t1 0 -fA- 0 0 .fIR- 0 4-t
p:; ~ ~....o N N U1 Ll1
~ -4R- -4R- + -fA- ~ + ~ QJ
~ e--- OJ
~ &1 ++ + 0 + + 0 + ,....
~ C'\ C'\
~ 00 IJ1 N 111 LI1 N 111 Q1
~ f'o. --.T -.:r ~ ~ -4' {J]'
..- C""1 ~ \Q .-+ \0 \0 ........ \Q en
u ..fA. ..fA. -tR-- -IA- ~ -tA- ~ ~ ~
,.,......, ...-.. ....--. ~
ttJ l'JJ tI] ~
~ }..I ~ ~
aJ OJ ,-t Ql a.t
\4..1 4-J a3 ........ 4-t
aa OQ~ tJQQ...t .,...t OQtJ,..f Q,Q 4-t
C t: 0 C 0 ,... c 0 c 0
....-t ~ 1-1 -1"'1 '""' .&.J ~,-t l-& ~ ~
C ~Q..+ CP-. U1 C~ C:~
~ c 0 0 :::1 0 0
<N N...c N..c '"0 N..c N ,.c ~
~ rn in c Q1 en 0
M ....-f as r-f ra H .......; co "1""""'1 co 4?""1
..--f ~ ~ 0 as c..J cttU ~ U .w
aJ c: I""""f C '" C C ......t
,.. 0 ~ 0 013 0 eo ~ 0 lJtJ a c.o "0
:2 ....... ...... ~...... c ~.,.. c- rrJ ..,.., C ~ ~ = otJ;
..,; .-J .u .w~ .u ~ -4 .u ..,.. .u .... 0 c:
:>-t .-t ....,... c .'1""1 "'C ....-i "0 tJ .....-4"'0 ..... "'e U.........
p:: ;:1~ OJ "0 ::: "'C ~ )..j "'C :: '"0 ;:I C
0 tJ C ~ eM ;::rl <1l C....., c~ ~ 0
0 UJ ~ 0 e" 0 C,j Q tJ ~ a u 0 u eN
J::J ~u fll 0 >< c..J c: U >< c.J C aJ
~ c: 0.0 .......... <1l ..........~ ~H 0 -.... ~ -.... ~ e ~
< -oot -< 3: ~ '3'-" 3'-' 0 3"-' 3'-" < 0
U c:
a
~ N ~ ~ -~ ",...... 00 102
C:J aJ m ~ c.J "'0
~ p::: "'-'" .........", ~ '-"
~ \
e e
A TT ACHf-1ENT 1
4
M
= ~
p:J
0 ~
"" ....-4 ill ---...
en +J 1-1 M
Q) 13)0 H '"" CJ 0\
~ ~O c.J "C crJ "
tJ UM ~ ~ 0
tU CO ......... a ~ .LJ: :J
tf.J ~ ............;.JLO tJ 0 ,w.a.J ~
~ Lf1 0 U]~ 0 r-I 0 0 -.....
-4" ~ ~..".. .J: N -.-... ....... M U
~ ~ ~ ..,...j H (J ~ U1 -..... ~ ~
40-4 "0 Q) co ,.....t co M
S3 + + a~ co + ~ -4A- ~
a.1 cO 4-4
t1l 0 o,.c ctI 0 0 +++
0 111 a~ fJ1 Q) Lt1 tn
Poot 0 1.11 LI1 ....... aJ J...4 <::) ~ 0 0 I.l1 L.t1 Ln
0 ... ..:t ...:t 411 ~ ~ <11 .. I' 0 C'CN~
p::: N t/1 N ~ 0 tJ,.c:: C"I ~ ~ U'1 NN~
C-4 ~ ~ -4R- ~4-f aI .;..J ....... -Mo -fA- -4I'r ~ .f!Ao ~
c::
0
'" ~ 11)
OJ ~ ~
Q.1 Ola ~ ....-t U
)..I HO CJ "'0 ca
tJ CJN ca t:
~ qJ cu -... 0 ""'" ~
-.... .......... ~ U1 CJ 0 .;.J~
trl- o U1,...+ 0 M 0 a
<:3: 04" M ).I ~ ~ ~ .......... r-""t r-t
~~ en ....... -fIA. ~ ~ 0 ...,. lt1 -.....-.....
HHe-+ '-'4 ~ QJ aJ ..... 00 M
E-+>cn +- + ~~ OJ + ~ ~ -IR-
CI]~O QJ cQ4-f
~~c..:: 0 0 ..c: ctt 0 0 U1 +++
LI1 0 .... (JJ Q.1 tt1 t.n N
0 1/1 111 -i Q) 1.& 0 "'-7 111 0 U'1U"1U1
'" N N .. J..l ,... aJ till 0 NNf'..
N 00- 00 ""1 0 ~~ N ...... ..... LI"l N(".I-:r
-6A- -.q- .fA- of.4. t,f.-t a:J+J -4A- ~ -tR-- ..fA- .fJ? ~ ....,q..
III
..l-J
ctJ..,... N
dJ C
::J ~
+J ~ 0
..,... N ~ 99""t
c: CJ en a2
:] .w ca ra ~ .4-J
__ rn -..... tJ (J 0 ~
en 0""'" tn U ct! n 0 .4J
~ N \0 0 ~ ......... ~ 0
~ .."..~ ~ LI1 lI1~M
)::.I Q) ..c:: U""l .,...... co~
+~ + c.J -4R- ~ .fIR- ""'
E-t 4-f ca 0M-
S 0 ~ 0 ~ + ++
~ '" +
p:: o.u t..n ~ 0 LI1 0: 0 0 ~o
t3 fiII.'f"""I " ...or ~ f'. ,...... r--. -.:r f"""oo l..t1
-t ~ U'1 ('l M '"' ~ "" r"' C"'1 M \C
U ~::!, ~ ..",. .fA- ..". -4R- 064- ..,.. -eA- ~ -6140
......1
ctt
:J
QJ
Ul ~ :J c
C rn 9f"'1 aJ <1J
0 :>... Q) c: c:: c: z.c::
.,...j .-t a OJ 0 0 C I I
~ ....-I 0 .,....., ..,... I..H ...... Cd ...... ,.....;
~ ........ ..., ~ 0 rn,..., ca co
.-..
rn a.I ...0 .-0 .u ...... ~ .-I p... :> >
Q] CJ ~ aJ 0 QJ C "'0"'0 ;: rn "'C cJ 0 0
fJ1 >< ~ ~ C QJ C <U Q] J-I s... r.n aJ~ ~ ~I""""l
::::J ~ aJ ~fI"'lI ~ e 0 c e aJ C'tS r-I 0 0 c.O-.co
~ ....., ..0 ,.....& en a.. u c a.. ~ 0 ca a.. a.. >
p::: ~ ,.-f c.. 0 tU ,....., 0 ctt 0 .w ~ QJ 0 J-I c:: -<< 0
a n:S t'tS ......t :E: ::I en 0.. r"""'1 "'d' ~ ...-t 0 .L.J 0 0 ~
t-' C ..r'I .4.J <IJ QJ t;jJ ~~ aJ ~ .w. .....Ii aJ aJ 0..
~ 0 tJ ..-I :J. c 6 ';J: :> OJ :> ,...., <U QJ C) U] > > 0..
~ .1""'l Ql - aJ OJ 0 aJ aJ E~ <1J ~ 0 :> OJ .fIIIIII ..,... ..-+ <
-< .u :i z p:: ..... :ZQ < 0 ~ c( c .~ ,... ::> -I-J +.J
.......
U .. ...-l en ::J .-.J .~ ..... cr] ~ r-"'i
"'0 ......i ~o "'::l .4-J .w ~
~ c"'C ..-. ,-.. ...-.. /"""". ~ ,......, ~ ~ ~ c r;:: c
~ 0 c: to ~ ~ "'0 OJ t.&-l \"C 0 aJ~ QJ dl .~ 00 103
~ CJ CCI '-" ~ .........., ""-" "-' >- <Np:: 0 en E- ~ ~
~ \
e
cu
QJ ~
M ~O tJ
CU CU m Cr./1 m
~ +J H ctJ ...........
en tJ ..u CJ ...........+JLI1
~ ctS ~ t:a 0 UJN
~ -...... M- ,--. a .......... .." J-4 -tR-o .
~ 111 (f.I ~ U1 ,-tR- 9f""4 ~
N cn~ ::: N 4-4"'0 aJ
~ ~cu cc tI] ~ + J:: .a.J
~.;..J OJ <U tU4-I
en + ;j +J ~ + U'1.c as
a ,....; ~ ---. C'l4ooJUIQ)
p... 0 tJ e 0 0 0 OJ )..I
0 Ll1 ~.a U'1 Q ~ lo.I l-oI cD
~ I"~ =' N U1 ,-t 0 u..c
~ '-' UJ ~ .4I.Joo .fA- ~ ca .;.J
o
'-0
N
~
1,("\
N
LI"l
~
~
e
ATTACHMENT 1
a
Ln
,......j
~
(11
a1
.......t
1-01
co
:>
o
\.l1
,.q..
Q)
Q) J..I
..-f l-IO CJ
QJ (Q QJ OtJ1 cu
~ .j.J ~ m .........
S1 u ~ tJ " J.J 1.11
< ~ ~ <<J a l'I.IN
~ -..... Cf1 tJ'J e -..... U1 ).I.-6fol- .,
<3 l.t1 ,-I ..a U'1 * .,... $..I
::c~cn N ttJ co ::s ('I 4-t "'0 aJ
HHE-t -640 al 40J rJ1 0614- + c ~
E-+>Cf.1 "'O.;.J OJ Q) ca ~
U]~O + ~.,.... '-+ + \I1.J:: ~ tn en
~~u -M 6 -..... N+J ~ Q) N aJ
0 tJ..o 0 0 0 aJ ,.. 0 11"') 0 -Pi tr)
Lf"J, ~ ;:] LJ1. 0 ... ,.. ~ aJ. \0 .. U'1 ~ N
.-..... ....-f t1.I N Lt1 t""""'I 0 CJ';: N ,....... .....-I ca -.:r
~'-' -tA-o """" -4A- t.t-4 CO+J -EA- ~ ~ ;:> ~
en
~
~
~
e-..
S
~
::J
tJ
Pd
QJ
~
........
as 5
J.-i"'"
CJM
co c:
--.... =,...--.
tI1 rn
....:-rn:r-l
-6R- OJ a3
"C.u
+ :J .u
r-t .....-t
o CJ e
MC~
00"""""::3
...,.. "'-' Q']
~
p:
o
~
~
e-.
<
u
'=J
'=J
~
.......t
... Cd
~~
co .;.J
..~ a
J..I OJ
~~
Ul~
:] (I]
"'C <U
C J-I
.,....
~
..,.....-j
....... ..-t
~ e
...,.... l"O
tJ~
~ ~
Q).....-4
~~
o ~
c.J e al
aJ
:J-~
aJ C .,...
Z co fn
en'
c
~
~
p..
aJ
J..,}
.,....,j
U)
o
c
~
r-t
~
Q)~
.jJ("'1
~
cnJ.J
fI1
1:]' ~
aJ..,-t
.L.J4--4
.u
"T"1'"d
e c:
..0 0
:t >-.
I;t] ell
Q,l..c
p:::~
Q)
~
CJ
cu
-.....
L.t")
.......
oM-
+
o
N
C\
.fA-
...
<U
CIJ"O
;:! ~
o <<I
..c
5
o
+J
oloJ
C
Q)
e
4-i
111
='
~.,..,
""C
-<
~
o
.~
C13
:L:
.....t
rei
"'"
~ en
..,; tU
.. CI1 ..w
~ ;J -..-I
rn ..... '"0 en
C ~ C
cr:t 6 ..,....,
rl cu
,:J..4-4
I
u~
"'P"'i .w
~ l""""'I
cu :J
e e
aJ
...c :J
u OJ
CZlZ
,....+
~
till c:
......., 0
aJ~
..,.,4 ..w
u ~
,. .oW
QJ ....-t
~ ~
o ~
c.J ~~
o
\0
N
~
00
~
..1""'4
C
c:
~co 1"Q
o .-1 ~
...,....0... 0
rn c.J
.f""t 'J-+ CJ
tJ 0 -<
aJ
~s... ,.......
o -ca
o.u ..,....
.u C'.J .w
QJ C
I"""""I)..J ..... ca
cu --+ .w
OJ a r;n
a.. ~
c.. u... :J
<0 CJ)
.0
otJ
~
.....-I
~
C
CD
~
~
o
en
00
..~
U)
rn
aJ
"'1"""1
~
co
::>
~
..0
aJ
c:
o
."
+J
m
tJ
.....
.-+
..Q
~
p...
-
ai
.L.J
r.n
CD
::%
C"..I-J
aJ C
J...i cu
U
al--t
,..... .-t
ct:J a.
}.I 0..
'-' C1:I
CJ
~~
,-..,
.-.. -
~
o
<U
,.......
'"
CI1
o
"'0
~
:>
..,....
en
CJ
Q)
~
CI1
C-
o
......t
.t.J
cc
U
........
.......
Q.
~
(U
l.I-t
o
~
~
..0.
5
E
c:
o
be
C
~
--c
c
aJ
0..
<U
"0
...
rn
en
OJ
,.....,.
~
~
t't]
z
~x
00
.....
M
g1
~
-....
~
0'\
c.:>
o
~
-....
t)
p...
M
104
e
e
ATTACH~1E~JT 1
AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE CODE OF THE COUNTY OF
CHESTERFIELD, 1978, AS AMENDED, BY AMENDING AND
REENACTING SECTIONS 18.1-9, 21-9, 21.1-17 and 21.1-280
RELATING TO APPLICATION FEES IN CONNECTION WITH LAND
USE AND DEVELOPMENT
BE IT ORDAINED
Chesterfield County:
by
the
Board
of
Supervisors
of
(1) That Section 18 .1-9 of Chapter 18.1 of the Code of
the County of Chesterfield, 1978, as amended, is amended and
reenacted as follows:
Sec. 18.1-9. Fees.
The fees for processing subdivisions by the
shall be payable upon submission of the plats to the
for tentative or final approval and shall be equal
following:
county
county
to the
(1) Fer-eTentative approval $345~ee $ 225.00
Plus, per lot. . . . 15.00
( 2) Fer-~Renewal of tentative
approval . . . . . . 3:;ZS..S8 225.00
Plus, per lot . . . . . . 8.00
( 3 ) Final approval . . . 65..98 475.00
Plus, per lot . . . it.sa 3.00
( 4 ) Appeal of decision of
Director of Planning. 260.00
00 105
e
e
ATTACHl.1EI~T 1
(2) That Section 21-9 of Chapter
County of Chesterfield, 1978, as
reenacted to read as follows:
21 of
amended,
the
is
Code of
amended
the
and
Sec. 21-9 Fees for hearings.
The cost
provisions of
required, shall
simultaneously
petition:
of
this
be
with
each hearing requested pursuant to the
chapter, including advertisement when
as follows and shall be deposited
the filing of the application or
fat--aef13:H.~-:-
t~t--A~~~e~ie~rai-fAt--.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-$--3~a.88
Pi~s7-~er-aere-7-.-.-.-~-.-.-.-.-.------~e.88
f~+--Res~aeR~~ai-tR-887-R-~a7-R-~5;-R-~5f
R-%~7-R-97-R-~,-R-~H,-R-MP,-MH-;-----645.88
Pi~~7-~e~-ae~e-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-----~e.88
W~eft-ee8ai~ieRai-2efti8~-.-.-.-.-.-7--~,~ge~8e
Pi~s;-~er-ae~e-~-~-~-~-~-.-.-.-----65.8e
f3+--eemme~eiai,-err~ee,-~8a~B~~~ai--.-.----645~ee
Pi~s7-pe~-aere-.-.-.-.-~-~-.-.-----Se.ge
W~~ft-eeftai~!enai-~eR~ft~-.-.-.-.-.-.-$i7~98.6e
Pi~B7-~e~-aere-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-----65~ee
fet--€efta~~~e~ai-~ses-afta-s~ee~ai-exee~eiefiS:
fi+--M~i~~~ie-~am~iy-er-ewe-~affi~iy-.-.-.-$i78~8.aa
PitiS7-~e~-~a~~-ier-eaeh-~aie
a~~e~-efte-ri~~e-ewe-t~7-~Ries------~e.ee
f~7--Me~iie-ReMe5~
a~--New-.-.-~-.-~-.-.~.-.-.-.-.-.-.----545~8e
5.--Renewai-.-~-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-~----~45.e8
t3+-Piaftftea-aeveiepffieft~~
a.--New-~-~-.-~-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-~-~-$378~8~ee
Pi~s7-~er-ae~e-.-.-~-~-.-~-~-~-----657ee
8R-:
Pe~-m~i~~~amiiy-er-a~~iex
-aweiiift~-~fti~-af~e~-efte-~~~~e
~we-f~t-Hfties--~-.-~-~-.-.-~-.-----~8.8e
h.--AmeRa-eefta~~~ea-e~-~iannea
aeveie~meft~7-eaeft-eeeas~en-7-~-~--~45.e8
t~t--Aii-eefte~~--~-.-~-~-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.----4~e.a6
Pi~S7-per-ae~e-.-.-.-.-~-~-.-~-----55.ee
2
PC/BUDG93/JAN19
00 106
,e
e
ATTACHMENT 1
(a) Amend condition of zoning, conditional Use,
or Conditional Use Planned Development not
including any change in use
or in bulk regulations. . . . . . .. $2,050.00
tet-Va~ia8ee~-.-.-~-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.------5~e.ee
fa7 (b) Appeal to decision of Director
of Planning . . . . . . . ~~8~88
500.00
3
PC/BUDG93/JAN19
00 107
e
e
ATTACHMENT 1
(3) That Sections 21.1-17 and 21.1-280
the Code of the County of Chesterfield,
are amended and reenacted to read as follows:
of Chapter
1978, as
21.1 of
amended,
Sec. 21.1-17. Fees for hearings.
The cost
provisions of
required, shall
simultaneously
petition:
of each hearing requested pursuant to the
this chapter, including advertisement when
be as follows and shall be deposited
with the filing of the application or
ta+--ae8~a~~
fi7--A~r~e~i~~rai-fA7---------$3~e~e87-~i~s-$~8.e8
pe~-aere
W~~h-eonaie~eftai-~enift~--$~48~ee7-~itiS-$65.8e
~er-ae~e
f~t--Resiaeft~~ai-tR-88,-R-4e
R-~57-R-~57-R-i~7-R-97
R-~7-R-~H7-R-MF7-MH-~,
MH-~t--------------------$645.ee7-~i~s-$~a~88
~er-ae~e
W~~ft-eOna~~~eftat-eeft~fi~--$i7~98~e87-~i~s
e~ei~a~ft~-~rerfe~S-ef----$65.e8-~e~-ae~e
easft-aftafer-aeaieae~eft
er-iana-er-~erse~ai-p~e-
~e~~y
W!~ft-eeftai~~eftai-~eft~ft~--$645.e8,-~i~s-$~e~98
~Rei~d!ft~-~~e~~e~B-ei----~e~-aere
easa-aftafer-aea~eae~ea
ef-iafta-or-perseftai
~re~erey.
f37--eemme~e~ai-err~ee7-~ft----$645~e87-~itls-$~e.e8
a~se~iai-----------------~er-ae~e
Wi~ft-eeftdi~~eaai---------$17~ge.ee7-~i~B
~eniR~-exei~aia~---------$65.ee-~e~-ae~e
~rer~e~s-er-easa-aftdfe~
aea~ea~iea-er-iaaa-e~
pe~~enai-~~e~e~~y
Wi~ft-eend~~ieaai---------$645.8e7-~l~~-$5a~ee
~eftift~-~nei~a~ng---------~e~-aere
~r~~~e~s-e~-eash-andfe~
aea~ea~~eR-e~-iafta-er
~e~SeRa%-~~eper~y.
f4t--Amena-eefta~e~eft-er-------Ba~e-~ee-rer
~e"~ft~-------------------di~~~~e~-~ft-whieh
leea~ea
4
PC/BUDG93/JAN19
00 lOB
e
(a)
Zoning reclassification:
(1) Without conditional
use planned development
(2) With conditional use
planned development
(b) Conditional uses and special
exceptions:
(1) Multiple-family or
two-family
(2) Manufactured homes,
mobile homes:
a . New
b. Renewal
(3) Planned development
a.
New Without zoning
reclassification
b.
with zoning re-
classification
}:,..
c. Amend condition
of planned develop-
ment
(4) All others
(c) Amend condition
of zoning, other than
condition of planned
development
5
e
ATTA.CHMENT 1
$2,050.00,
plus $45.00 per acre
for the first 200 acres
and $22.50 per acre
thereafter.
$4,100.00, plus 30.00
per acre for the first
200 acres and $15.00 per
acre thereafter;
$i,6~e~ee $2,050.00,
plus $~e.88 $45.00
acre
$545.00
$245.00
$37e~8.e8 $4,100.00,
plus $65788 $30.00
per acre e~-$~e.e8
~e~-mtti~~ram!iy-or
atl~iex-aweii~fi~-~ai~
af~e~-efte-~~~se-ewe
f~7-~Ri~s for the
first 200 acres and $15.00
per acre thereafter
$4,100.00, plus $30.00
per acre for the first
200 acres and $15.00 per
acre thereafter.
$=J45..88-eaen
eeeasion $2,050.00
each condition
$4~6.a8 $1,450.00,
plus $55..Se $20.00
per acre
$2,050.00
PC/BUDG93/JAN19
00 109
ot ~ ...
e
e
ATTACHMENT 1
tet (d) Variances
$570.00
t6t ~
Appeal to Board $~~8.6e
of Zoning Appeals
relative to decision
of Director of Planning
$500.00
(f) Sign Permits
(g) Substantial Accord
Determinations
$150.00
$1,525.00
(h) Deferral requests
by the applicant
$50.00 per
request
Sec. 21.1-280. Fees.
In addition to any other fees required by the county,
fees shall be payable to the county treasurer and submitted
to the planning department upon filing as follows:
fa7--eemmere~ai,-iftaHS~r~ai7
inse~~~~~oRai-.-.-~-.-.-~-.-.-.-~-.-.--$-8~e.8e
Pi~s7-~er-ae~e-~-~-.-.-~-~-.-.-~-----45.ee
fet--M~i~~ram~iy-~e~~aeft~iai-.-~-.-.-~-.-.----a~e.e8
Pi~s,-pe~-ae~e-.-.-.-T-.-.-.-~-~-----~6~e8
fet--Mas~e~-~~~e-~ia8--.-~-.-.-~-~-~-.-.-.----5~8.88
tat--Revi~ed-si~e-~iaR-.-~-.-.-~-~-~-.-.-7----3~8.ee
(a) Site plan:
(1) Original submittal, in-
cluding up to two (2) $750.00, plus
resubmittals..................$25.00 per acre
(2) Third and Subsequent $250.00 per
Resubmittals..................resubmittal
(3) Major adjustment to
approved site plan,
including up to two $500.00, plus
resubmittals..................$25.00 per acre
$250.00 per
(4) Minor adjustment to submittal or
approved .site plan............resubmittal
6
PC/BUDG93/JAN19
00 110
.
e
ATTACHMENT 1
tet (b)
Schematic plan-:-
$1,025.001 plus
$50.00 per acre
for the first 50
acres and $25.00 per
acre thereafter
f~t--M~~~~~am~iy-aRa-~ewfthe~se
~e~~aea~~ai-.-~-~-.-.-.-.-~-.-$3~e.8e
Pi~s7-pe~-~fti~-.-~-~-.-.---~5.ee
t~7--eeMme~eiai7-ifta~s~~~ai-afta.
ift~e~~~~fe8ai-.-~-.-7-.-.-7-~--9~e.ee
Pl~s,-~e~-ae~e-~-.-~-~-.---T5.8e
frt (c) Appeal to decision of director
of planning . . . . . . . . . 260 . 00
(4) This Ordinance shall be effective upon the date of
adoption.
7
PC/BUDG93/JAN19
00 111
It
e
ATTACHMENT 2
FY93 PROPOSED BUDGET
FUND TOTALS
General Fund $ 262,362,900
School Fund 229,155,800
Grants 836,300
Vehicle & Communications Maintenance 3,297,400
Risk Management 6,942,200
Airport 393,400
Nursing Home 6,035,600
Utilities 47,226,400
Less Interfund Transfers (126,245,600)
Total $ 430,004,400
B0136.wp]jBos #4
00 112
e
A TTe-1>1ENT 3
Chesterfield County, Virginia
Proposed Capital Improvement Program
for Fiscal Years 1993-1999
The Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County will hold a public hearing on
Wednesday, April 1 t 1992 , at 7 : 30 p ~ m. at the Chesterf ield County publ ic
meeting room for informative and fiscal planning purposes to consider the
County Administrator's proposed Capital Improvement Program (eIP) for fiscal
years 1993-1999.
The public hearing is held pursuant to Section 5 ~ 4 of the County Charter
allowing the public to question and comment on the proposed elF. All citizens
of the County have the right to attend and share their views thereon subject
to reasonable time limits as shall be determined by the Board of Supervisors.
These projects are in addition to the 1988 Bond Referendum Projects.
The County Administrator' 5 reconunended Capital Improvement Program (elP) is
prepared and published for information and planning purposes only. The
inclusion of a project or projects does not constitute a conunitment or
obligation on the part of the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County to
appropriate any funds for that project or purpose~ There is no designation or
allocation of any elP funds for any purposes until there has been an
appropriation for that purpose by the Board of Supervisors. The elP is for
informative and planning purposes and will not be approved, adopted, or
ratified by the Board of Supervisors at this public hearing.
Chesterfield County
Capital Improvement Program
Functional Area
Total
Libraries
Parks and Recreation
Public Safety
Regional Jail
Transportation
Drainage
Airport
Planning
General County
20,348,000
6,297,000
20,183,000
16,000,000
17,700,000
1,400,000
1,142,000
725,000
10,896,000
TOTAL COUNTY
94,691,000
Funding Sources
Available Debt (Above 88 Bond Referendum)
General Fund/Reserves
Cash Proffers
Private Sector Contributions
Revenue Bonds
58,048,000
20,676,000
14,100,000
725,000
1,142,000
94,691,000
1
PC!LCW2!PC132 0 0 113
e
e
SCHOOL PROJECTS
136,325,000*
Funding
Debt
Reserves
Cash Proffers
118,100,000
6,000,000
12,225,000
136,325,000
*School requests totaled 148,500,000. Funding available = $136,325,000.
ROADS (6 YEAR PLAN)
92,943,000
Funding Primary
Secondary
Revenue Sharing
51,925,000
38,018,000
3) 000, OOO*~t(
92,943,000
~.'*This represents the State portion of revenue sharing projects.
portion is included in Transportation section of County total.
County
ADDITIONAL INFOffi1ATION ON THE elP IS LOCATED IN YOUR BUDGET
BII1DER AT THE elP TAB.
2
PC/LCWZ/PC132
00 114
808-9891
{o.E.1.
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVI SORS
AGENDA
MEETING DATE: March 11, 1992
6.E.7.
ITEM NUMBER;
SUBJECT;
Re~ffirm/Resolutions and Special Recognitions from
Board of Supervisors Meeting of February 26, 1992
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
R~~d. f.)#,,~
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
During Mr. Warren's absence on February 26, 1992, the
Board adopted a resolution recognizing The Greater Richmond
Chapter of The American Red Cross on its 75th Anniversary.
The resolution should be reaffirmed as it included Mr.
Warren's signature for ceremonial purposes.
PREPARED BY;
ATTACHMENTS: YES-.
NO []
SIGNATURE:
.~
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
00 115
,,-
. BQS.9891
{P.Etf,
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVl SORS
AGENDA
~
MEETING DATE:
March 11, 1992
ITEM NUMBER ~
6.E.8.
SUBJECT:
VDOT 1992-93 Primary Allocation Hearing
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: J
f'~ Att1fe 5111 ~rk. ai7
o.! ~~ e
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
The Board is requested to approve the attached priority list of
highway projects and statement regarding Chesterfield's primary
and interstate road construction needs.
BACKGROUND: The Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT)
will conduct their annual "preallocationll public hearing at
10: 00 a. m. on April 8, 1992 I at the Richmond District Office.
The purpose, of the hearing is to consider input relative to
VDOT's 1992-93 allocations and update of VDOT's interstate,
primary, and urban systems six year improvement plan. The six
year plan identifies the road improvements VDOT intends to
construct within the next six years. VOOT's hearing provides the
County with the opportunity to recommend priorities to VDOT I S
Commonwealth Transportation Board (CTB) for Chesterfield's
primary and interstate road projects.
The priority list for highway projects approved by the Board on
March 13, 1991, is attached (Attachments A and B). Staff is
recommending several amendments as outlined below and shown on
Attachments C and D.
PREPMED BY:
r;L--
A82
R.J. McCracken
Director of Transportation
ATTACHMENTS: YES II
NO CJ
SIGNATURE:
d~
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
00
.
.
Agenda
March II, 1992
Page 2
. The widening of Route 10 from Chippenham Parkway to the
Chesterfield Courthouse has been completed or is currently
under construction. The Route 10 widening can, therefore,
be deleted from the primary/interstate priority list.
. The widening of Courthouse Road from Route 60 to Route 288
at Five Forks is a secondary project and will be addressed
in Chesterfield's Secondary six Year Plan. The Courthouse
Road projects can, therefore, be deleted from the
primary/interstate priority list.
. Route 360 from Turner Road through Old Hundred Road is
currently the most congested road in the County. Widening
this section of Route 360 to at least six lanes should be
the County's highest priority. VDOT's six Year Plan
currently includes widening Route 360 from Turner Road to
Walmsley Boulevard and from Genito Road to Courthouse Road
in 1992. Route 360 from Courthouse Road to Walmsley
Boulevard will be widened in 1995. VDOT's 1992 improvements
to the Route 360/Courthouse Road and Route 360/Walmsley
Boulevard intersections will significantly improve traffic
flow on Route 360 between Courthouse Road and Walmsley
Boulevard. The widening of Route 360 from Route 288 through
Old Hundred Road, where major backups occur during peak
periods, should, therefore, be a higher priority than the
widening of Route 360 from Courthouse Road to Walmsley
Bou"levard.
. The construction of Route 288 North from the Powhite Parkway
to Route 60 should be the County's second highest priority.
The County and VDOT jointly funded the design of Route 288
North. PUblic hearings were conducted this past summer.
Although several design issues remain to be resolved,
several compromises are available. The construction of
Route 288 North would help relieve congestion on area roads
(Coalfield Road, Genito Road, Old Hundred Road, Route 60,
Route 360, etc.) and help promote economic development. The
Powhi te/Route 288 interchange loops and ramps should be
constructed if funding is not available for the complete
construction of Route 288 North. The County should request
VDOT to construct the loops and ramps this spring.
. Improvements to the Chester Road/Centralia Road intersection
should be the County's third priority. The intersection is
very congested during peak periods and is unsafe. The Board
recently adopted a resolution requesting VDOT to provide
signalization and adequate turn lanes at this intersection.
VDOT's plans currently being developed for the intersection
will not provide adequate turn lanes.
00 117
e
e
Agenda
March 11, 1992
Page 3
. The widening of Chippenham Parkway to six lanes from the
Powhite Parkway to I-95 with interchange improvements should
be the County's fourth priority. Chippenham is carrying
between 55,000 and 60,000 vehicles per day. This volume is
expected to increase in the future. Funding for preliminary
engineering and right of way acquisition for the Chippenham
widening is currently in VDOT's six Year Plan. No funds are
programmed for construction.
. The widening of Route 60 to six lanes from Courthouse Road
to Old Buckingham Road should be the County's fifth
pr ior i ty . This sect ion of Route 60 carr ies approximately
35,000 vehicles per day. This volume is expected to
increase in the future.
. The widening of Route 10 to six lanes from Route 1 to 1-295
should be the County's sixth pr ior i ty . This section of
Route 10 carries as many as 32,000 vehicles per day. This
volume is expected to increase in the future creating more
congestion.
. Construction of a Meadowville Road/I-295 interchange should
be the County's seventh priority. The interchange is needed
to help promote economic development and to prevent
unacceptable levels of service in the future on Route 10,
Meadowville Road and Enon Church Road.
. Preliminary engineering and right of way acquisition for the
County's II outer be 1 tway" (powhi te Parkway Extens ion from
Route 288 to Route 360, East/West Freeway from Route 360 to
1-95 or 1-295, and North/South Freeway from the East/West
Freeway to I -8 5) should be the County I s eighth pr ior i ty .
The engineering is needed to properly identify the location
of the II beltway . II Right of way should be acquired where
growth threatens to infringe within the corridor.
. Preliminary engineering to consider the feasibility of a
connector between 1-95 in the Walthall area and 1-295 should
be the County's ninth priority. The eastern area of~ the
County -has been planned for major commercial/industrial
employment centers. When this development occurs, Route 10
(from I-95 to the Appomattox River) will be the only major
highway serving the area. Route 10 will not accommodate the
expected traffic from the commercial/industrial
developments. The extension of Route 288 from I-95 to I-295
would help reduce traffic on Route 10. However, the
extension of Route 288 would be extremely difficult to
construct due to environmental impacts. Route 895 will not
00 118
e
e
Agenda
March 11, 1992
Page 4
relieve the traffic on Route 10 according to VDOT traffic
studies. Extending the County Thoroughfare Plan's East/West
Freeway from 1-95 to I-295 will help reduce traffic on
Route 10. Engineering is needed to determine the
feasibility of this connector.
. street lights on Route 1 between Chippenham Parkway and
Kingsdale Road should be the County's tenth priority.
Route 1 has a high rate of pedestrian fatalities. street
lights will help make pedestrians more visible to motorists.
The County recently installed street lights in the Park Lee
area. Additional lights are needed on the remaining
sections of Route 1.
. The construction of Relocated Route 144 (Centre street
Extension) from Chester Road to the Harrowgate Road/Route 10
intersection should be the County's eleventh priority. The
County and VDOT are jointly funding the design of the
project. Public hearings on the plan are tentatively
scheduled for this summer. Approximately $2 Million in
additional funding is needed to construct the project.
. The widening of Route 360 to six lanes from Old Hundred Road
to Otterdale Road should be the County's twelfth priority.
This section of Route 360 is currently carrying
approximately 20, 000 vehicles per day. six lanes will be
needed to accommodate future growth in the area.
. The construction of Route 895 from Chippenham Parkway/I-95
to I-295 should be the County's thirteenth priority.
Route 895 will provide a more direct route from Chesterfield
County to Richmond International Airport.
. The construction of sight and sound barriers along Powhite
Parkway, Chippenham Parkway and Route 288 should be the
County's fourteenth priority. These barriers are needed to
reduce the impacts of the roadways on adjoining
neighborhoods.
. Preliminary engineering to identify potential park and ride
facili ty locations should be the County' s fifteenth
priority. These facilities will be needed in the future to
help reduce countywide congestion.
A comparison of the Board approved priorities and staff
recommendations is shown on Attachment c.
Attachment E shows Chesterfield's primary and interstate projects
included in VDOT's current six year plan.
00 119
e
e
Agenda
March 11, 1992
Page 5
staff and VDOT are currently developing an update of the 1990
Secondary six Year Improvement Plan and will forward it to the
Board for consideration within the next few months.
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends: 1) the Board approve the
amended priority list for highway projects, 2) the Chairman of
the Board present the attached statement at VDOT'S public
hearing, and 3) the statement and priority list be forwarded to
Chesterfield's Legislative Delegation.
00 120
~.
l
e
e
VDOT 1992-93 PRIMARY ALLOCATION HEARING
APRIL 8, 1992
I AM HARRY DANIEL, CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD OF
SUPERVISORS OF CHESTERFIELD COUNTY.
I APPRECIATE THE
OPPORTUNITY TO APPEAR BEFORE YOU TODAY TO PRESENT
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY'S PRIMARY AND INTERSTATE ROAD
NEEDS.
WE WOULD LIKE TO, ONCE AGAIN, SUBMIT, FOR THE
RECORD,
CHESTERFIELD'S PRIORITY LIST
FOR HIGHWAY
PROJECTS. ALL OF THESE PROJECTS ARE VERY IMPORTANT TO
THE COUNTY.
IN THE INTEREST OF SAVING TIME, I WILL
ONLY SPEAK TO SOME OF OUR MORE URGENTLY NEEDED
IMPROVEMENTS.
WE FULLY SUPPORT THE WIDENING OF ROUTE 360 FROM TURNER
ROAD
TO
GENITO
ROAD
CURRENTLY
SHOWN
IN
THE
DEPARTMENT'S SIX YEAR PLAN.
SINCE THE OPENING OF
ROUTE 288, ANOTHER SECTION OF ROUTE 360, JUST WEST OF
THE ROUTE 288 INTERCHANGE, HAS BECOME VERY CONGESTED.
DURING PEAK PERIODS, TRAFFIC ROUTINELY BACKS UP FROM
OLD HUNDRED ROAD ONTO ROUTE 288.
WE, THEREFORE,
RECOMMEND THAT YOU WIDEN ROUTE 360 TO EIGHT (8) LANES
FROM
ROUTE
288
THROUGH
THE
OLD
HUNDRED
ROAD
INTERSECTION.
THIS WIDENING SHOULD BE CONSTRUCTED AT
THE SAME TIME OR BEFORE YOU WIDEN THE SECTION OF
ROUTE 360 FROM COURTHOUSE ROAD TO WALMSLEY BOULEVARD.
- 1 -
00 121
e
e
THE SECOND PROJECT I WOULD LIKE TO DISCUSS IS THE
CONSTRUCTION OF ROUTE 288 NORTH, FROM THE POWHITE
P ARKWA Y / ROUTE 288 I NTERCHANGE TO ROUTE 60. WE HAVE
JOINTLY BEEN WORKING ON THE DESIGN OVER THE PAST
SEVERAL MONTHS. WE ARE CONFIDENT THE REMAINING DESIGN
ISSUES CAN BE RESOLVED ONCE THE FUNDING FOR THE
CONSTRUCTION IS COMMITTED. WE URGE YOU TO MAKE
FUNDING FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF ROUTE 288 NORTH A
HIGH PRIORITY. THE LOOPS AND RAMPS AT THE POWHITE
INTERCHANGE SHOULD BE THE FIRST PHASE OF THE
CONSTRUCTION. PLANS FOR THE LOOPS AND RAMPS ARE
COMPLETED. THERE I S NO REASON THEY CAN'T BE
CONSTRUCTED THIS SPRING SO THAT OUR CITIZENS WON' T
HAVE TO CONTINUE TO USE THE INADEQUATE SECONDARY ROADS
IN THE AREA.
I
THE IMPROVEMENT OF THE CENTRALIA ROAD/CHESTER
ROAD INTERSECTION IS ALSO HIGH ON OUR PRIOIRTY LIST.
I AM - SURE YOU ARE "AWARE OF THE TRAGEDY THAT RECENTLY
OCCURRED AT THIS INTERSECTION. IT IS CRITICAL THAT A
TRAFFIC SIGNAL BE IMMEDIATELY INSTALLED AND ADEQUATE
TURN LANES PRIOVIDED ON ALL THE APPROACHES SO THAT
FUTURE ACCIDENTS WILL BE PREVENTED.
- 2 -
00 122
e
e
THE LAST PROJECT I WANT TO DISCUSS WITH YOU TODAY
IS THE WIDENING OF CHIPPENHAM PARKWAY FROM THE POWHITE
PARKWAY TO I-95. WE ARE PLEASED TO SEE THAT
ENGINEERING AND RIGHT OF WAY ACQUISITION FOR THE
PROJECT IS INCLUDED IN YOUR SIX YEAR PLAN. WE URGE
YOU TO PROVIDE ADDITIONAL FUNDING SO THAT THE WIDENING
CAN BE CONSTRUCTED.
AGAIN I WANT TO THANK YOU FOR THE OPPORTUNITY TO
APPEAR BEFORE yOU. I WILL BE GLAD TO ANSWER ANY
QUESTIONS.
- 3 -
00 123
t"CJ :0 ::a :a ::a " ::a -" ~ ::c ttl(J) t'Il 'tI oz ::a 0 n ~
gJ 0 0 0 0 0 0 no 0 CD 1>>"- cu 0 < 0 0 ~ 0 0 I
'1 C C s: c c c ::rc .: p,I '1..c m :( CD t; G """A G C
~ rt rt rt" rt rt rt ~rt rt ~ '1::r rt :r '1rt rt' ra ., rt
...... II m .-0 lD m CD ~m d)- o lJ.rt ....... ~~ ::t (D "0 rt (Do
::0 'tJ ~ CD :E rt >....... CD :r 8
...... to-' U .... ... C'\ u mco N 11R'1 CD CD 't:Jtn I\Jo ::J 0 ....
Q, 0\- ,e. A. 0 0\ :31..0 CD ~ en m "Co CD :r c 0
CD C ~ U1 0 ::rUl (Q ..... en rt f"O o C Q) J:P rn
OJ ..... 0 I>> Elrt a CD
." e CD .c: ~ t1 1>>:1
PI ....... "' ~ t1 ~ (t ~ ::a
n t-t H ~ CD :( rtPIJ PI 0
...... ~ I m OJ Ot1 '1 s:u
..... D" N ( '< >c CD ~ g.
..... C \Q at CD .:
rt t1 c.n ~ :G( g,
...... ::J ..-..PI ~
m c <'<
CD a <<Ii
'1
~
fodno en "" ;:tH HH 0\ 0'\ ~ ".. H on:o--o :J:-::tI M"d. >~(IJ~. >::GtI]-"" ~ 0\ ... en m
1>>00 rt tD:J B:J ::s rt::roo n..- :J 11 n .....::1 t1 n t--:J t1
I1;C ., I--' SU(1' ~rT' ..... ...., l-' t-oII rt :r......c:a: ..a..a l"QiI.... .Q..al,Qm-...... ~..c..a.(I~ ....... """'" ~ t-oII
X' ::I CD II .....m J1 CD ~ QI 01 B1 (D (D f1j rt :r c:rc..-.-PI c 0" t--- ~ PI I:::r..........e>> t>> (>> OJ DI
..,..crt" CD ::I "''1 0'1 ~ ::s :s ::J '1 t1 "C CD t-'. .....rt'::::I:sI-::I ~ rt"::J ...,.:J t--rt::J.....:s :s :s :s :J
:f rt- ~ rt I'D ..am <UI (D. CD CD CD 0 (lid) rt m 1c..t'DSCD UIi IfOSRI In Imsm (D CD (U. (Do
~rD .... en :::J m CD m VI UI 1I1 fII :r :;SNCD ......0 iD ...... m 1-".0 tD ~.tn to- 0 iI ~- Ql tIJi (II (tI (Jl
'1 ...... .... ~ a n EI n p;I =" (Q ~ rt~ '1:J rtt"ttt1::S rt........,:s
b Q, ..Q ntrt CDrt' :3 ~Q) .... I ......p, ,..... a ~- PI ...... I ....A DI
CD ::r :3 t-. ::J .... '-A a... O~ ::s '1 o::t::Sl1 O~::It1
rt rf' ('to rtO CD :f DI \C"< :J GhQ to.( :sOt\Q~
en ta :J m :s '< ~ ~
~ R"
",,:t3.,,:::t1 0
0 ::a n n :c n n l-t t-l n H~~1"fj 0 ~ ." ~ ~:z:J n z
00000 ::r 0 ::r ::t' c ::r :T t 1 0 :so><o 0 0 0 0 o 0 ::r
cc:C~c .... ~ c co m ...a .... .... '-0 f\J C (t'Crt€ Dl c € :( C ~ ~A
rtrtrt:rrt " rt m U1 c "D -a U1 \0 :s &rtC'J::r ~ rt :r ::r rt'rt" pC g
CD t'D CD .... (b ~ m rt rt (tli fQ fO U1 rt '1CD::J~ ~ CD .... . ~. t'D CD "C
rt CD CD t'D :s CD I'D ~ n UJrT' ..... rr r1' CD m ~
.....NWEDO\ :::J N 11 t; 0 :3 ::I ;rwtJoot'D m .... m CD wo\ :J
omO\... 0 ::r CD rt :r :::r ~. DI 0\ 0 t-I 0 0\0 :r ~
030 PI CD :xJ " g, gI C. ::I 0 ::I SJ,. 0 DI
a 0 0 a a m ..a ....... a
~ OJ m ~
c. Q.
e
e
,...., ..... J-I
0\ U1 ~
....
u
I-" t-4 to-'
f\J ..... 0
U1 ".. \oJ
N
......
\D CD "
C'\
~ 0 ::c :::tI 0 Cl H .... :I t-t :;Jj ..... " H 1"Ij~ on
..... rr gI 0 ~ f1) t I CD I 0 I 0 I ....0 0:1
::s rt t1 .:: 0. ::J N N DI \0 G (I) 5: \0 <c C CD I~
Q ~ t1 rt t-~ '" \0 Co U'I rt U'I rt U1 tDrt t1U1
[no f1 0 CD ttI n- Ul U'1 0 CD CJ t'D rtrt
g, g. :( c 0 ~ ~ :rm
I>> l>> '-D N n u 0"1 OW o P1
10-' ~ g, CD ~ ~ 0\ 0 1'10\ CHt
CD ltJi r1' CD .... . ..... 0 X'O (II .....
m ::s ...... [II CD m
::z:t ::a ..a (D ....
0 0 ~ :r c.
PI PI S>>
Co Co. a
~
n-
IT
QJ
0
::r
~
m
~
IT
~
00 124
i
,--
"
,
,
I
,
,
I
I
I
I
~
I
I
,
I
,
I
I
I
I
,
-4IIIt ,
, ,
" --
tilt _I
I
,
~
~
rt
IT
PJ
o
::T
8
,(1)
:J
rt
OJ
z.
j
e
(
)
,
J
t
\
.....
-. -~
"
"
"
~
- ,.-,- -~~ -~....~
,- ~_ _ :., ' _I '....t (I) .". ~~.'
"', "..i .. , a I ....:
~ rI ~I
'.. ,~
..-' : -" l g · ~ :
I~ "l,,;~'" ........~ "'...., .. Q . ~
I ,... '"
,
f
I
I
.. ~ -"""
,
,
"
"
"
,
"
"
"
"
,
"
CD
~
~
en
ti
~
H
~
n
~
~
~
@E)
~
o
~
~
~ ~
~
o t-i
I"IJ
en ~
~ "
~ ~
C1
~ !
~ l<
t'tI
fi ~
e ~
g ~
o
~
en
~
~
l-I
en
o
~
=:1
~
~
::u
Jl\
"-
;0
6
I'll
~
~
r
~
""
en
(J)
Gi
=i
"'"
(J)
o
c:
z
o
aJ
J>
~
.:l]
m
:t1
(J)
.....
u
~
'J)
00 125 ~
c...~ rJ
I a
U'l =-
. ""'TJI
-0 :ll>
ru ~
~
;:~~
.... . II::
.-c'" . :::;I
_. II: ....-
::J .,..-<
o.ICll .,.. .:
.., .....'
~- :}
'"
:;:o::I.J;u,;::;lt)
Q a 0 a CI
-= t: C . c::
".,...",.. - =-..,...
~ In fU ::.: to
_ nJ (.I,J t'IlI
or;U(J- C
~.? ;:!..
"<
..,.... '"'U
~ ILl
n ....,
~~
:;:~
~, n.
RIi ...
en
;;;0
c::.
:.
fU
~
.....
fO
~
..c
;::
Vl
n
E
""CI
...
;:,
~
~
.
~
-<
~
;.
oQ
.,.
D..
PI
:0
;U
~
:;:
::u
o
~
...
rD
IAi
g.-
O
;"
='
tw
....
;:(J
o
~
...
ru
CO
0)
~
.....
It'
..,
D-.
:.
JIll
;;:Q .
fL
w
;;:0
o
J:::
.....
.a
...
-#'-
~-
I"D =-
.... --
-....
..... -.
Lb 1ft
==' I'D -
'= ~
:::I _ .
<!+ 0
=-
.;;'
"l:I ......
"'" rD
Go ....
< '"
to ....
. n
[~
VI =-
-
N
~
:.
....
:;:
U1
9
~
II'
.....
tD
..,
;;:Q
c:a..
::0
Q
~
fD
ru
tz)
CQ
. + + . . - . * . . . . + * . ~
~..
1-3
1-3
~
()
~
:s:
trj
z
1-3
n
"'T't ~
... ~
n -.
_. ...
--
.... . ;:Q
-- .....
,.... c..
Ilt ...
'"
--u n
at C)
"'1 .
~!
...a fD
~
..---
=
n
;:r
....
....
.,.....
t'D
..,
;:0
A.
x
~
"""
""1
10
.
..:.
=:
t'P
::c
~
rn
o :0 ""'D
:roo
...... 'J:: .
~ - ::r
"I:) tD _.
"' ...-
=' ru All
:::J""" ItU
....m""'U
.... :I'If""
-<
~ ..:
-::
("'"I
C
t=
~
-<
.:
0.'
n:I
~
t:D en
.. -.
....0
.... ;:r
.... . -
ra
~ ..
r.f)
D
,g
D..
n
o
lC
~
'<
.
;;:
.
:::
::0
o
~
...
000-
00
......
....
7:
U1
::z::
-=
~
,.::
III
:::II
:.
::u
A.
~
Po
tv
J::
n
:-.
::s
0.0
p-
IU
.
;:u
~
e
:;
::u
a
~
fill
W
0--
o
gJ;
-- .Q
""Cj U'I
-a
...
~
:J"""
PI
~
r--
~
cr
-=
.....
~
...Q
fC
.,.
g
-b.
~
tQ.
.s-
IIU
.
~
-::
-.......
.
I'U
-.Q
I;.J'I
i;I)
:::u
C\I
~
t'D
ro
tu
CO
..
=-
ra
'"
,
..0
LIt
..
ru
..,g
U1
'""
=-
- AI
, ..,.
ru a..
.u Qo
c..n.
~,
;"
~
~
-
~
m
....
n
=:J'
.,
::lI
-a
fit
Q. n :;lO -0
::roo
o _- e::: c
_'Q'" ::J"""
::a-"D f1II "'" .
... tW -
.... =' N ro
t,n::J'""CU
..co-n
. - ~
-0 -::
;I'll;'"
-...:
C %
.0( 0
"" ...
.., .....
:pe:
-0 rn
on a
: ~
::,,:Y
.... ""'"
: -
fa
~ .
...... .,
<-<
fa
...,
~ ::f .... ~ ~ -... ~ ~ ~
..a ... -..a t'D _ ~ .. -
::r_CW.:;l'""-.,=r-..
_.. ::::II __. ::11"""- :=I
J (Y1:= J rn~ J m::
..... =- ~ :=t ..... :::J
*=~ J:~ ~~
.,. ~- ....
"'""'t --< "'-C
~ U1
.. .... .
~ i.CI
-. :r
..... ......
nJ
....
...
(,1"1
o
-=
::I
A-.
~ r
n
C)
c:
:t
...,.-
-<
~.
D.
;0
;"C"~
::~~
.., - _.
n :lIU-
:;t""gf'll
~~"'U
.c fa ;II't"
.. -<
tAl ..
g-.
o
e
m
..
~
1C
~
"'V
Uo
!
-
...
""U
,....
-::
:;Q
Q
~
ID
~
..
ro
U9
:;:u
a-
t::
;;
ru
c;n
t;D
:;-
:t
to
U\
-u
u
.
~
.....
n3I
-n
x-
-...<
:;:lJ
o
~-
fa
0-
Q
w
r-JI
~
-g
fill
=-
;r
~
.
"'"0
"'"
-c
0-
;.
::;I
..
...
-u
Q
.
~
-
f\J
-U
""'"
"<
..
...0
'"
::u :::u
0, g
c:: ~
..... ......
1'1) tI)
~ 0.-
g... 0
0>
." :0
..... 0
<C C
I'D. .....
+ntl:l
a c....)
... D~
~ 0
...
n
o
!:;
-
:1"'
a
II:
&n
nJ
::::Ill
c..
..
:::J
,.
ut
(""l rl
CJ ;:r
-= ..
-t '"
.... ..,..
-:rtD
o ..,
c:: ......
U) -.
lit ...
. . . . * . * . . . . . - . . . . . . . . .~. . . ~ . . . . . . . . .
-
W
"I
to
-0
U1
;:
::II
...
'"
n
~
-u
-a
~
::I
::r
Di'
.
""U
""'
-::-
..
01
o.C)
lA
;;
:::J
..
U't
n
~
-.cII
"V
tD
::J
:;r.
illII
.
~
....c
en
rD
e.
......
o
:;::0
D..
N
;:0
ell
S.
I'D
W
1)-0
ClI
go.
..
:I
,..
....
~
0..
::%:
C
~
p..
...
fa
A,..
~
a..
~
~
A-
Pol
~
:;XJ
P-
:::
- ;;:0
no
I'D It:
:=t ......
..........
..,
ria -
,.fI-
~..r;-
ru
......
0.
=a
,..
....
n
;::r
I'IlI
~
ID
-.
:u
p.
;z:
~
.....
....
do
.
"g
~
....
.:n
Q"
~
:::u
o
S.
...
~
-I
fD
...
....
.lQ
;7
.....
In
9
""C
~
::r
~
.
""Q
~
--::
.;J"'Ii:
;'
..0
U'I
II;:L
...
:;
:;:u
g,.
..
ru
....0
~
::JI
r1II
...
P-
o
.
~.
-
...
.::;:u
CL
...g
z::
I
:;jiEm-%
o ... -0"
... .,.. (:J .
....."....
:r - ::r ..."
...... -= .... ..,
~:l:;:;
t::: 4+ .
........ -v"
:T ,... -<
"1' ton
~
....
...
.
~
-<
~
....
:.
.;::u-.::J
-. ....
..a ...
:::r -
J~
~=-
. o,g
a:....
... ..
....c
m
:::J
l.Q
.....
..
-a
t.II
~~:-"
;:::u "'D n
g 0 01
~~~
fIIi ... ' ......
..... -.
-...n:t
0, -
""U a..
:JIIII:"
-<~
. ~
rrl
=-
7
fU
..0
U1
- _ ;;:0
. . a
(Il ....I) -=
ItJ"I LIt g.
LaJ
go.
o
G:J
~
-
.
N
~
~
.....
~
n
:::J"""
IlU
::J
~
.,.
=-
fD
..
a.
10
.
::.
I'D
::0
~
"'T1
...,
'II
..
.
.,
-<
~
~
.....,
E
C2..
:::Q ~
c:t.
..
-0
U1
::0
IQ
c=
.....
tJt
W
0-
o
Q~
tit
::0
C
'~
f1J
~, 9
:. .c.
nJ ~
..
0-. :::J.
o ~
...
.
""'Q
~
-<
o
0'-
0-.
;"
;
IU
~
...
II'
~~
~
lo.D
t:::
..
:::I
g
""
~
f'-
_ ::u
t 0
....u~
LIt --
f1\I
7.
ru -0
..g ......
....,
~
Q:
~
~
::I
l.Q
~
...
..
::u
~
...
-
..
::)
..
...
--v
c
a
::
-
nJ
~
,.-
......0:
.
...0
l.II
.ii
... fQ
o ...,
.c f,ft
;: ~
tt) ....
==' ......
_0
U" ::::II
w
;:0
a
S-
f1I
...
VI
n
="
....
~
""
..,
;U
Q,.
::u
o
-=
;;'
N
a:J
CD
-r
;;
:::J
to
...
~ ~
""Vi _ -0
o=-o
. -..
=,"...:1""
-. .., -.
.... n .,.,...
lO:rtD
""O~-u
]IIOIf" o.CII II"f"
~~-:<
::u
(:i
~-
ra
0'.
0.
fU
::;p
o
II::
-
nJ
nJ
CD
tXlI
r-
g
o
-a
.::;....\
=-
'"'1:11
U'I
~~~~
n ;:0 rJ -i
i:I (:II Q ~
~ .:: -= ..,
... ..... ..... ;;I
_f1I....rG
=r ;;;r-""1
CII ru 0
,::ooc;:Q
",muo-a..
f1:I fD"
;:0 :::n
~ Po.
-:;Clm~
... - fit ...
_CL:::;II .-.
- _. -
"'::::1:_"'"
-- ~ 0 -~
I"IJ::I f1:I
-< 0.. ;\tJ.<
.... Q.
~ ~ <0 ~
<: """
0..;0 o.
-?-
;;It:I
CII
~
t'U
a..
:::I
....
'"
n
:;.
"1:3
"'C
f1)
:::f
=r
~
.
~
-<
::0
o
~.
111
(..I.)
0-
C)
r-
~
::I
111
..n
00
""U
~
t=)
~
-..
-<
"
;Q
o
L.4
,..,.,
n
-..
UJ
o
%-
::u
t::I
+-u
~
t::J
~
......
--<
:::
(J'J
-t
;:l:Io
I:JI
o
"""'U
-4
fI'1
t:.
:.s.
:Do
;U
n
.x
1Il::'
m
UJ
r1
~
--n
~
c:J
:z.
om
:::Q
o
=-
F
~
~
-t
o
~
~
:=;
~
-...
......;::
-u
~
--4
rn
1'"",
~f
1:::1
n,
U)
C-I
~
""0
~
<::J
;Z
in
--I
no
.,. '1
.,.,
~,.
""'
rJ
(:)
:It
2'
rT1
Z
e:II
"'
t::t
-u
:u
CJ,
::u
:-;
....::
~
~
~
tll
-t
~
CJi
126
,--
,*'"
,
I
f
,
I
I
I
I
I
!G
I
I
,
I.
I
I
I
I
I
,
I
- -~, I
." .I \
"0 '0, I
, I ~ j
tilt tit ~ I~
I OJ O)(~S~@. ~~
I ~~ liD.... - -. /
0\'0 __ ~_--:--._ / _
, ~ f ___ --= :;.:-
;' - ~~'.) ------0\1
~' 'i-, /.~, ~ /~ ~
-~~~,~~ ~
' l~ _~, ./r
I .~rc-
10 6. ~L21
:~'f 1
-@tUi~
rF:~')
~~
...JIIC..
;;
I.
~
rt
rt-
OJ
()
::r
:3
(0
::J
rt
a
Ze
e
(
)
,
I
\
\
.....
"'
..... - .........
,
"
"
"
,
,
,
1}
~~
"
,
I
. .,..-..../ "'t
- II" '" _.....
; ....... ,.., /_. '-...: (f').." + :~
, .. , ~ ~t - J I i~
: ~ !
:- 0 ";
" ~... :;""\,...... 1:J .~
.... ":.. ~ ..... ~ ':;lit 9' .:
.
,
f
i-
.
,. - --...
\
\
\@
~
1Py.~ 'If
I!~;
~
,
"
,
,
"
"
'"
"
@@
=
I
~
~
~
~
-0
~
:u
,.;:
..........
~
6
IT1
~
g
r
3
",
lI)
~
G)
~
..........
en
o
c
z
o
CD
"
::u
::0
m
;u
(J)
t-I
H
~
~
~
!
- ~
127 ~
en
00
(f)
I I - I -
. x
-
I .
. -<-0
.
I .
- 111::0
.
n n c n )>-<
.~~ 0 0 2 0 ::u5:0
z :2 0 z 0)>0
(J) (J) ('T1 (J)
...., -t ::c -I o::O-t
:0 ~ ;0
c c ("') c z-<
x- n n 0 n
'8 -i :j -I '"
0 z <5 (J'J-Il
~ xu> 0 en 2 --(Z-<
-t Z 2 --i
rt n - ;c 8 ;t]--I(j)
ri- a Z CD ~ c Crn_
OJ z :: rn ::f n s:
n d -t n::o f
(J') _ :c 0 -0
~ ~ F r -1U)fJ
S c - z 2 z (TI 0--1-<
m n 0 0 -I
::1 -t Z (J) ~ fT1 Z~<.D
rt" - tn X X 0
t:rj ~ 0 -< -< "l)rrl-..J
"'Tl I'Tl
0 0 rr1 l>
!4 0 1> :D r
~~ r ::0 :t:>
I"Tl r "
l> -0 r Z
:u r 1>
(,/) l> :2 00. 128
:2
e
e
~
z
......
- - -....
,
x
c:
r-
r-
"
"-
"
'\
,
"
"-
'"
'\
"-
"
"-
'-
~ .E.q, a..t
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
March 11, 1992
MEET ING DATE:
ITEM NUMBER:
6.E.9.a.
SUBJECT:
Change Order to Forterra Corporation Addition
And Renovation to Central Library
COUNTY ADMIN IS TRATOR' S COMMENTS:
R~
Aif~
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
This item requests the Board of Supervisors approval of a Change
Order to Forterra Corporation for the central Library bond
project to complete the following:
1. Clearing for the easement for Virginia Power.
2. Additional excavation and placement of selected
engineering fill.
3. Provide and place filter fabric and stone.
4. Pour .in place additional concrete for footing.
Total amount of this Change Order is $59,893.73. Forterra
Corporation was the successful contractor to perform the original
work for the sum of $2,120,000. Due to poor soil condition and
the need of providing temporary and lighting easement to Virginia
Power, it has become necessary to perform all above work.
This Change Order brings the total construction contract to
$2,179,893.73. Funds are available in the bond project account.
ACTION REQUIRED BY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS:
Approval of change order to
of $59,893.73.
William H.
Director
Services
ATTACHMENTS: YES D
NO Jl
SIGNAT URE :
~
COUNTY ADM I Nt STRATOR
00 129
BOS~9891
i>
tn~E~ 9, h.
, -'';''
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
MEETING DATE:
March 11, 1992
ITEM NUMBER:
6.E.9.b.
SUBJECT:
Change Order Number 1 to Airport Improvement Project
#3-51-0007-07/Grade Runway Safety Area
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
j(u.L)~d IJ~
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
This item request approval of a change order to the J.H. Martin
and Sons contract for runway grading at the Chesterfield County
Airport. This will accomplish the lowering of mainline
electrical cables below proposed grades, provide porous backfill
and stabilization fabric for an undercut area of proposed taxiway
liLli, and intercept subsurface drainage from two uncharted
underdrains from the runway.
This project is funded w{th 90t Federal, 5% state and 5% County
funds and project funds are available for this change order.
Action Reauired bv Board:
Approve change order number 1 totaling $16,857.50 as indicated
above.
ATTACHMENTS: YES 0
NO II
William H. Howell
Director of General
services
SIGNATURE =
~
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
00 130
80S-9891
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
March 11 1992
MEETING DATE: . I
6.E.IO.
ITEM NUMBER:
SUBJECT;
Award of Contract For Phas~ I (site work) for the
Public Safety Academic and Physical Training
Building
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
This i tern requests Board o,f Supervisors approval to award the
Phase I (site work) contract for the Public Safety Academic and
Physical Training Building to W. E. Duke and Sons in the amount
$678,641.
In FY91, management directed that the Public Safety Academic and
Physical Training Building project be broken into two phases due
to funding constraints. Phase I is the advanced si te work
cons i sting of.. the inf r as truct ure - requirements i . e., dr ainage
sewer, water, building pad and parking lots and overall clearing
and grading for the building which will be awarded in Phase II.
Phase II construction costs are estimated at $5,000,000.
This project is part of the 1988 Referendum for Public Safety
Training totaling $8.1 million. The overall Public Safety
Training concept has been split out to Public Safety Academic and
Physical Training Building to be located on the main Government
Center and the Training Center Offsite at Enon.
Funds for the advanced site" work are available in the project
accounts.
ATTACHMENTS: YES 0
NO ~
PREPARED BY~
William H. Howell
Director of General
Services
. '
SIGNATURE: ~
COUNT~ ~~OMINISTRATOR.
..
00 131
805-9891
~,
f .
~
.
e
.
, .
Board of Supervisors
Agenda
March 11, 1992
Award of Contract for Phase I (site work)
for the Public Safety Academic and Physical
Training BUilding
Page 2
ACTION REQUIRED BY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS:
e
Approve award of contract to W. E. Duke and Sons for the Phase I
si te work for the Public Safety Academic and Physical Training
Building in the amount of $678,641.
00 132
BOS-9891
{p , E .11 ~
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVl SORS
AGE NDA
MEETING DATE :
March 11, 1992
6.E.ll.
ITEM NUMBER:
SUBJECT:
State Road Acceptance
COUNTY ADMINISTRATORt S COMMENTS:
Re.~J
lJ~rXroA
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
The Commonwealth Transportation Board requires all Boards of
Supervisors to request, by resolution, what roads are eligible
for inclusion into the State highway system. This process starts
with the submission of road and drainage plans to the Department
of Envirorunental Engineering and Virginia - Department of
Transportation. Once the plans are approved for ~ construction,
the subdivision is recorded. This allows building permits to be
issued by the Building Inspection Department.
After there are enough qualifying homes (VDOT requires three
occupied dwellings per street), the developer will request a
discrepancy list from. VDOT 1 Environmental Engineer ing and the
Utili ties Department. The developer then completes the
discrepancies, if any, and obtains a letter from VDOT,
Environmental Engineering and Utilities stating the roads have
been completed per the approved plans. The subdivision section
is then placed on the Board Agenda for final approval.
The appropriate information is then forwarded to VDOT, by
Environmental Engineering, and then the Commonwealth Transporta-
tion Board Formally assigns the Route numbers to the'new streets.
(continued on next page),
P 111t!c-U!~
~ /
R~chard/M. McElfish, P.E..
Dl.rector
Environmental Engineering
PREPARED BY~
ATTACHMENTS: YES If
NO 0
SIGNATURE:
~
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
00 133
e
e
Board Agenda Item
Environmental Engineering
Page Two
Subject: State Road Acceptance
It is at t'hat point that the VDOT officially takes over the
streets for maintenance of potholes, snow removal, maintenance of
culverts, roadside ditches, etc.
The following are those subdivisions that have been approved for
State acceptance by VDOT, Environmental Engineering and the
Utilities Department.
Matoaca:
Ashbrook, Section 3
Chester, Section P
Deer Run, Section 5
Woodland Pond,. Section 4
Midlothian:
Dedication of Portion of Walton Bluff Parkway at
Walton Lake
Walton Park, Section R
00 134
e
e
MEMORANDUM
TO: Board of Supervisors
FROM: Environmental Engineering
SUBJECT: State Road Acceptance - Ashbrook, Section 3
MEETING DATE: March 11, 1992
Broadreach Drive
Halyard Terrace
Halyard Court
~~~~~~~~ ~~~.I~~ ~
/
u. s. ROUrE ~60
AMENDED
I. PLAT OF
i ASHBROOK
1 SE.73~!ON~
j
f
J
l
00 135
e
MEMORANDUM
TO: Board of Supervisors
FROM: Environmental Engineering
e
MEETING DATE: March 11, 1992
SUBJECT: State Road Acc~ptance - Chester, Section P
Percival Street
~~~~.~R ~E~IIO~ ~
< ~~ ~/
-~~. _--- ~~r --~1- ->r_ -'
'("A""~-.....C/~ _-tt.-~ ~_
- tfP .
~.~--:e
"" 'i~ .
Aif
4l
/
~/.A.// .,.- Y ~.,.c
./..,.,. ~G'oa-
'.
~ . -- ~-=~- ~-~
..s: c--: -< .
~~
~
d~"
lrJ/
/7;
.//"
//
\
"
00 136
e
e
MEMORANDUM
TO: Board of Supervisors
FROM: Environmental Engineering
MEETING DATE: March 11, 1992
SUBJECT: State Road Aqceptance - Deer Run, Section 5
Spotted Coat Lane
Spotted Coat Court
Key Deer Drive
Key Deer Circle
~E~~ ~~~ ~~C.I~~ ~
/: ct/oorl
1, /""5r'lf -> ~
) -- I
r II ~/_rl.~
,'-Ii II
/ .... ,,;,.I.,..
J ~ ~_.
/ ~~
\/rCfN'T Y
SCALE: r'. =2000'
'L
/
I
~?I'
(J
'Y.~
MAP
00 137
.e
MEMORANDUM
TO: Board of Supervisors
FROM: Environmental Engineering
e
SUBJECT: State Road Acc~ptance - Woodland Pond, Section 4
MEETING DATE: March 11, 1992
Whistling Swan Road
Whistling Swan Place
~ClC)J:)L-~I'J:O
S;E:C:. I (Ji'I
~ ClI'J Lt.
F"CllJ~
o~o
~
I
I
,...-J
/
/
I
S /--1
I I ,
L.' I
-I I
,
r ~J .J
t
\
\
'---.,
t
,
r~
\
,
,
\ '
\
,
c-<-
~~~
POCAHONTAS
STA TC PARK tk
FOREST
~-o
(<'c
~
~
/ WOODLAND r '~
t-.Ji POND f
\l.O"~
~
...po
""9'0
00 138
#
e
MEMORANDUM
TO: Board of Supervisors
e
FROM: Environmental Engineering
SUBJECT: State Road" Acceptance - Dedication of Portion
of Walton Bluff Parkway
at Walton Lake
MEETING DATE: March 11, 1992
Walton Bluff Parkway
r:.>E:I:>IC:~'-ICJI'J Cl~
~Cl~'-IClI'J elF"
~~~.~~ ~~~~r ~~R~~~~
1=\, I,.J~L- IClI'J . '-~I<E: .
~
., ~
I~ ~
~~
~~
~ ~
'~
(
00 139
e
e
MEMORANDUM
TO: Board of Supervisors
FROM: Environmental Engineering
SUBJECT: State Road Acceptance - Walton Park, Section R
MEETING "DATE: March 11, 1992
Queensgate Road
Shady Glen Drive
Dannyhill Road
Beauridge Court
1,.J~L-TCli'l P'~FlI<
!:3E:C:.Ic::J1'J ~
l
r
00 140
,.
808-9891
(p~ E. /rJ, ,
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
MEETING DATE: March 11, 1992
6.E.12.
ITEM NUMBER;
SUBJECT: Agr7e~ent for Maintenance of a Sto~ater Drainage system
Fac111ty for Dixie Electric Supplies.
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR1S COMMENTS:
R,r-~J J) ffhrxJ-~
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
r- ,
Stormwater runoff from developing area 1 s poses two concerns.
First, development tends to change the hydrologic characteristics
of a given watershed, affecting the volume and runoff rate which,
if not managed, can. cause considerable downstream damage.
Second, evidence indicates that this runoff may be more parmful,
from a pollution standpoint, to state waters' than sewage or
industrial discharges. Stormwater management facilities combined
with Best Management Practices (BMP's) are utilized to lessen the
water quality,-and quantity impact caused by stormwater runoff.
Best Management Practices refer to those controls that have been
proven in the past to be effective and Jl.lay include structural
(pond and lakes) and non-structural facili ties such as
maintenance operations and procedures, management techniques and
reduction of paved surfaces.
Stormwater management facilities (structural BMP's) are commonly
used to attenuate the peak runoff rate of stormwater and provide
(Continued)
ATTACHMENTS: YES.
PREPARED 8Y~ ~c-t:.tY~
R-c ard/M. McElfish, P.E.
Director .
Environmental Engineering
NO 0
SIGNATURE:
~
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
00 141
e
e
Board Agenda Item
Environmental Engineering
Page 2
SUBJECT: Agreement for Maintenance of a StoDmWater Drainage
System Facility for Dixie Electric Sup~ies.
for precipitation of suspended particles or sediment. This is
accomplished through the use of three general types of
facilities, detention, retention, or infiltration.
1. A detention facility detains stormwater for a ~ given
period of time in order to release it at + a rate that
will not exceed any downstream capacities or otherwise
cause. erosion. These facilities are normally dry
except during rain events and shortly thereafter.
2. A retention facili ty serves the same purpose as a
detention facili ty except that there is a permanent
pooling of water (lake or pond).
3. An" infiltration facility allows stormwater to soak into the
ground and, thus, requires specific sandy soil types that
are. normally only ~ound in the eastern portions of the
County.
The County's involvement in stormwater management is driven
by a variety of forces, among which are: state erosion,
sediment control requirements and the Chesapeake Bay
Preservation Act (CBPA) , the EPA National Pollutant
"Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) mandates, Flood Plain
Management Ordinance and Upper Swift Creek Ordinance.
Ultimately, the purpose of this involvement is to prevent
loss of life or property and deterioration of water quality
within, around, and-downstream of development.
A large majority of all ponds and lakes constructed in both
conunercial and residential settings over the last fifteen
(14+) years are designed for either water quantity and/or
quality control. We currently have seventy-three (73)
approved and constructed structural Best Management
Facilities.
BACKGROUND:
Due to the limi ted availabl'e capaci ty of the downstream
drainage facilities anq costs asso~iated with upgrading
those facilities, the developer opted to detain. water
on-site. A detention basin which was designed by a
professional engineer to accommodate the stormwater runoff
and approved by the County.
00 142
e
e
Board Agenda Item
Environmental Engineering
Page 3
SUBJECT: Agreement for Maintenance of a Sto~ater Drainage
System Facility for Dixie Electric Supplies..
The maintenance agreement consists primarily of final
inspection report, preventive maintenance inspections every
three (3) years and an indemnification agreement for the
County. The responsibility for the integrity of the basin
falls with the developer of the property and any subsequent
owners. The County's only involvement is the assurance that
the maintenance agreement is being followed by the owner.
The agreement has been approved as to form by the County
Attorney's Office and has been executed by the developer.
DISTRICT: Matoaca
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors authorize the.
County Administrator to execute the maintenance agreement with
Dixie Electric Supply Corporation as approved by the County
Attorneyls Office.
00 143
-
...
:{
v ~
I-
-
c1\
-
=r
)<
\-LJ
00 144
"-
"-
"
"
..
(r
r - ....._-~..Ii....,.....
~ /9 "P4
"\
'"
",
\-
\
......
.......
"
.........
.........
..........
........
..........
........
.........
.........
...............
'-......
...........
.........
:"\
" iI.J --- "
~,~ :::
" " 0). ~
No A. __
" il' 4:'
'- -.... ~ o.lIJ ~
'~ "-
.tV .........,g
f i ~r -
\O/~
......... " r;
'\'\9
"
~
~
1
.......
.............
..........
..........
.........
............
.........
..........
.........
..........
............
........
-------
.........
"
"
...........
.........
..........
.........
........ "-
"'-
.........
...........
........
...........~
..........
..........
.........
.......
........ '~"
...........
........
.........
........
....... 6cf'
"-.....~
............
OS'€,
'- -- ~..............-...
I€f;
"
.........
""""-
.............
"
........
---
.........
......
..........
, ............
- --
~-
jtL
~~
~~
-... ......... ......... -...... ~ ~
1~~
~1:U)
1JI\f1
~" 7.~
"-...
.y
!-@
HI...... - .......
~ E"'€e-
//~PI "!.l:t 6/12
j~ < . .:roag <:7-,.
-o~ . -l.1Y.!1J-v~~d'S>p.. .
- ...( b" /11' ...,." I .;y ...i. N
".~ ~ a C).ElL n :>3
-...
....... c:?F or
"
z,(
00
145
~~r;...13.
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
MEETING DATE: March 11, 1992
ITEM NUMBER,:
6.E.13.
SUBJECT:
Award of Wastewater Contract No. 88-0132 for the
Construction of the James River Trunk Sewer Project
Odor Control Facility
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR1S COMMENTS:
R~A~
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
The .James' River_ Trunk Sewer project is a Capital Improvement
project that will provide public wastewater conveyance for
approximately 8000 acres in the northern area of the County.
This project construction has been separated into two (2) phases,
Phase I being the lower portion generally routed'along- the James'
River, and Phase 2, the uplands portion routed within and
generally along the, Chesterfield County line from the James River
to Michaux Creek. As part of the Virginia State Department of
Health approval '.for. this project, the State requires that prior to
making any customer connections an Odor Control Facility be
constructed to eliminate both odor and associated corrosive gas
from the conveyance system. In accordance with the State's
requirement, the Odor Control Facility has been designed,
advertised and bid. Staff requests that the Board award Contract
No. 88-0132 for the construction of the James River Trunk Sewer
Odor Control Facility to Gulf Seaboard General Contractors, Inc.
in the amount of $413,000.00. The bid opening was held February
26, 1992. A total of 15 contractors submitted bids ranging from
$413,000 to $540,000. The amount of the bid is consistent wi:th
the engineer's estimate. Bid amount is based on a set lI.uni t pr. e
bid" consisting of estimated quantities and final constr ctio
PREPARED BY~
ATTACHMENTS: YES II
. Edward B ck, Jr.
Assistant Director
of Utilities
NO 0
SIGNATURE:
~
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
00
805-9891
r
.'
.
.;..0'.
~(
Agenda Item
March 11, 1992
Page 2
costs are determined by the actual q.uanti ties installed.
for this facility are appropriated in the current
Improvement Program.
Funds
Capital
RECOMMENDATION:
Recommend to award contract to Gulf Seaboard General Contractors,
Inc. in the amount of $413,000.00.
DISTRICT: Midlothian
o 0 14 '-i'
()
...
"(':>
--t
::0
C
Z
^
in
m
~
m
:n
::IJ
o
C
--1
rn
& ~E ~ It/.
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVl SORS
AGENDA
March 11, 1 992 .
MEET ING DATE :
ITEM NUMBER:
6.E.14.
SUBJECT: Award of Wastewater Contract No. 88-0132 for the James
River Trunk Sewer Phase 2
PREPARED BY~
ATTACHMENTS: YES B
NO C
. Edward Bee , Jr.
Assistant Director
of Utilities
SIGNAT URE :
(~
COUNTY ADM I NI STRATOR
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS;
Rec~d If~
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
The James River Trunk Sewer project is a Capital Improvement project
that \\rill provide public waste\\Tater conveyance for approximately
8000 acres in the northern area of the County. This project
construction has been separated into t\\l'O (2) .phases. Ppase I,
currently under construction, is the lowland phase of the project
generally routed along the James River from the
Chesterfield/Richmond City line to the Chesterfield/Pownatan County
line. Phase 2 is the upland phase of the project routed within and
generally along the Chesterfield County line from the end point of
Phase 1 at Robious Road near the Chesterfield/Powhatan County line
to Michaux Creek and then along Michaux Creek to the existing
Michaux Creek Wastewater Pumping Station. Phase 2 of this project
has been designed, advertised and bids \\1ere opened February 27,
1992. Staff requests that the Board award Contract No. 88-0132 for
the construction of the James River Trunk Sewer Phase 2 to H. Hamner
Gay and Company, Inc., in the amount of $1,608,602.00 plus up to 10%
to cover any changes in e~timated quantities. A total of seven (7)
contractors submitted bids ranging from $1,608,602.00 to
$2,209,322.41. The amount of the low bid reflects a v ry
808-9891
00
.....
~;:.. ..
.
.
v
Agenda Item
March 11, ]992
Page 2
competitive amount below the engineer's estimate. Bid amount is
based on a set "unit price bid" consisting of estimated quantities
and final construction costs are determined by the actual quantities
installed. Funds fqr this project are appropriated in the 'current
Capital Improvement Program.
RECOMMENDATION:
Recommend approval to award contract to H. Hamner Gay 'and Company,
Inc. in the amount of $1,608,602.00 plus up to 10% to cover any
changes in estimated quantities.
DISTRICT:
Midlothian
00 150
._~' L '.
. -, I ~ I I
;.t..: .; I
~ '..
/-~.:~4~' -
,>~'"J ~ TI\
II ~ ~ (,..
~' :fr
"- ....ll.. ~,~ II
()
....
~
-i
:::0
C
Z
^
in
m
:f:
m
:0
:n
o
c
"""""
If'
r'
~t E. /5.tl.
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVl SORS
AGENDA
MEETING DATE: March 11, 1992
ITEM NUMBER:
6.E.15.a.
&!BJECT: Request to Quitclaim a portion of various easements across
property owned by Breckenridge Associates at Breckenridge
Shopping Center
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR1 S COMMENTS;
Rec~J J}~~
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
Breckenridge Associates has requested the quitclaim of various County
owned sewer, water and drainage easements across property owned by
Breckenr idge Associates at Breckenr idge Shopping Center , located at
Jefferson Davis Highway (Route 1) and Ironbridge Road (Route 10)
intersection. Easements needed to replace these have been dedicated.
Therefore, the original easements are no longer needed. This request
has been reviewed by staff and approval is recommended.
RECOMMENDATION: .
Staff recommends the Board authorize the Chairman of the Board and
County Administrator to execute a quitclaim deed to vacate various
easements across property owned by Breckenridge Associates.
DISTRICT: Bermuda
PREPARED
ATTACHMENTS: YES I'
NO [J
John T. Hewitt
Acqu. · lons Supervi or
Right of Way nivis10n
Department of Utilities
SIGNATURE =
~
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
00
805-9891
r'
____ VICINITY SKETCH A.
REQUEST. TO QU1TCl-WJA A PORTION OF VARIOUS E~MENTS ACROSS PROPERTY
"''J!
f >
...'
~~~
(
~
(-,L_~ ___
\
\
I
1/
I
D
()
U
/
/
Ii
// /f \
, r ~ \
~ \..r~
//'~
/" )'
(
Ie IO!
.t=;"//
/ J.... /1
( ; .98 99"G"~
/'
/"......
u
C'.~rF 'l,.5
~
...--. '---....,
'____- ..r
.--=
'7
r
./
t ;
<f~<r.,
Q
I~
~ -':;\, ~
l~
Jg ;J -1\
"aoR:}-1~ -.j~.r'e III [\
- - n-3S\ \v: t I'
~, ,,~ ,-'c, / I
~-- c.? ~s"';""f'j l' I c~ RC:EVI ~ W I:) j 6 HA.J.oi I LTO N D ~
'..J ! 2 _ CH~ C LE. V I (J'Ii' C, II 7, KIN G 5 CC L.i R'1l'
3. C:;URTi....)..."H) ~~,
.. LA" (V r (... CjJl.1' .
- ~ ~;;~~~:r/ III
~.""-..yft5.. '(1)/ J ]'Ii~
& \...~:...~::-- - /~ lD'
, 2'i -: "\~ ~ - .>' \ li I "", :' 1 [\
-'~ ~,~~.,;~~\af~:~i J '&1!r! i
o"_~ _/~~~~_-;, <Sl-=~'~' \:~~~~!!L/0c~"c"" " .~
, ~ -;:: ~ r r j ''- \, ~~
I ::; , - - ::' "i ~~\l" 1:. 'is-:., , I !; ( : ".';;,,,.... <9.:; > -
_.,,' ,,'''' ~ ~ f. J" _,~~ '~., ".;; i,i" 0;-' 0...
':'- :::12l -~:.. ~\\ [:
~ ,,' C.
4;\h '1,
\\ H ..-...... ~ , 0 5Q ..' ~~~ J
\~0.'." -~:;\"\JC~
............
...---...
~ '" I
\ \-\l..J
"\.......,~~I:~J
.,~ ~ I
,~ I
I
.......-------;:-~I;
~
I
i..
!~
r 0- JZ
. " I l~
~
":\c 1 I ~ ~ ::
-, I
" t' \
- ,
L..),.
e",,_
~~ "v~;t;~
:-
....... _I.......l
- ..,j
\
\ f
~
Q. ~
?I'~ <v="
i.J~
v' o;;r
9_.....: "OJ:.
~..:::d'~... ....
n
1': ,/
~-,~, ct
(- w
:
r"" q
~ a.
\
.1
-:;
~;=-~~;Q~\
~
: ~~~.""A'
~- -"",*,---
jl~
.~- ~
>>7
Il~-<l<:
~~~:,1- ;:;Ci.
:~,~~s ~ -=-.....
00
42
~
.....--
H
Q
153
. - f t
i ; ~ . - '-'_"'~.' ""':~.' . ~~.:~~ .""..... "~ -...
<;' I _' ,,,,i:~;' t '"'", - -------
F;. ,_~.D-~ .~!_~ .~~'
~.~_ ' ..,..___.-r - '''~ .......... - - - '......J. .- - - -
,'-- " -, '.. "<.~;',-':""':'-_-:_-------:-l-('S~----~I:::::_,::::.:;_
I . .... ..... J ' I - ~-,1'.
/ / .:; ~- -t ~ ~.~ .....~~~~~ :1:: : ; ~~ -~-- -: .-::'F.1"
I'" .;; ~,. ~. :u ~ -"" ...: .... ': _':".... r I ,- "'~J........ ~ l' I : I
. , ;. , ~_'. ! ,I- .... '. '-I:' ~ 11 . I .o../ I
"::.~ :....; ~J' //J. 10 C:-i~~f ' ~, I 11
~. ' ."oJ tori/ II I;' L... '01 ( t ~ .., I'D ~.r._' ti,L, ~. yJ
,/.Y ,: r~JI~ : ",.,~ ~ ,~ · '-- ~.-: : /.1_
. '~........( OUIk' -.J J-"n J ;~ ;, S. , ,I : '
_,,11- J r ,_a . '-'l'" ~ I'
,,1:' . 1I l,;l.J
.c ,. / If.? ,~: J j 11
~ ,Vl i . : .. I ,/ / / ; . I ~ · J ;,' ,
.. ::u ". ~o. I , ~ "1T,." CO 1 , ,~ l~ :>; I · I ,
~o 'I /// 1.j ~~f: '!II
: c j o..; .-..1 :.' .J--. . " " , : I I 1 ~
. ---f ~ ,L ~ ~'? 1 I ./ :- ( I i r: j '.; I
J ~ . U' .:-- I 1 .-, ' W.' /" , J ~. .~~ .,...' ( J ~ J J
c...... -..J \-) , I, . : / ,. ,. / rJ-. Lt. .o;.''';"-J.:..: t
a. -i I ' ,. '" /" . 0: I"', IT! 1
i_)' I f / I
- .' ~. .., i r /.... ~ "1'. : I ~- "1)'1, J J f.-.,:- ob w~.~
Jr '( t \ ~ , ' I ; ..; ,. / ~ ~ ' i I ~) l l. 'It,~ .
1 :", [.:..;~.:,'~ I /' ! ,',/ · '," ,J.! ;'.:'7";"@q-.:'.",'
~;; , ~~ ^_ _: .::/~ I J . / / J I ,1 I~" r I .,.', ;,
<- · (!/!' . - " :.-: :..>~ ( ." ," " 'iL _ _ ,- 1. --:.: f /~;, J;r' .,' '
r'....-- .. .,..j -- . L_...._ " \..,..\ ....r,'".... r-~-" I~r .
- -.. _ -,.. -. __ ('~' ~ = 'J [ - : _ -=- ~ -..~ - __ _ _ J I _ _ - - -~-=", _ I... ~..... '(.. -/ ,_ _ , j
-. __ - ~ '"'" _ - ~ _ . '- . - ......J , .... .... -. - - - ~ >. - - '... \ . \ -~ r' I' " 19.-'1 . P
- -~::- ~- - - -: __ ~ '_ - - -: ~.~ :--~ ._~ ~ _ _ 3~ - -~~-: '\ \, \ .. ~\', t , 'f.
.: \" - -. .~ ~ ...... ___ -, .-f" -. -"" - - . '.. \ \ \ ), j i ~ +
- ::..... ~ - ~.J 'J) ~- - '7" - ~ _/ r--'': ~:C~'l r \. i ~. \ I" \ ;;-J J \ ;' r .~ ..
(. l~.- (.;: .,'. _~' _ "I. '. \ ~, "'l- . .. 'I _ . .') J I ~ J
\ . \' \ " . I. ~ l ~~ '\ \ \ "l" . \ ~,.:1 ~...,' ~~ : ,.
-t \ \ " I ; l \ \ \ , . '~1 ,
i~J \ \ I - I \ ' \ n..l( ~ ~ I ~ - \ ~ \ I J I I
~ - I \ \ , ' J ~A.:r. -~ \' ' ... . \ \ t ~ t I
.. l \ ~\ I I: l\.\ ." \ . \ tt(" 'j
_ \ ,~:I._. \.\ ... \../ [1
~ t.'-, \ \ \ l.~ I ~ ~ ' \ \ ,: j' I .'
/ -=----=-~w~_'.~r-.-_.r.-_.,....--.:' '.\ I : ~ l "( \ ~ ,} It.... ~l Jf~' - - , "
. -. .~ .. ~.... ) l, l \'..\ . ~\\'~.. .:":.:--~: ...>; :; . ~ ~ . -
--J ~l' j I ; ~ \ \ \ \', \ \ ......... :... -.. ':" .... ... ./:t ...:::'
I I \ \ ,-~ u - , - .. ....l"
p .~ ' .. = ..... .....~ \ \ , ....., ~l . \~_.\ l.. .... - :.......t,t,l"f J L"
~ J . ..... Io:r... (.;~ . tJ 1oiI' II J ~ 1 7 J -
j I J " .~ { .... .... ~..... ~,~ \', roo .,.' ~ ..,. r - ... .... .... ..... ....
.... '\ '\ ',,\ ~\l~. ~ ~ .... .... .:... ........ ...,
\ J ~ ; :,i ~~
_ ....... ~ '\;''\ ::~:'1\ \ ", '," . I "
\ , ,.. ~ ~: / ~.~ L.::: ~,':
,.~.. '~.. '1 ~ ~ ,. ~,... . '\ '. \ ' . .'
\ ), I;: ;~; '::
\ ~: ;~...;: \. \. ~~ ~ -.. '" .' U l,~~.~ .~::
. , ". ~. '.': ~ .. ."
L I ....' , ~J ..., ".1. lit
~:~,~: .' ......po/. "~
~~ .... ....: ...\... " ~,~
, (.:
--- ....
~1L
";'
~
tl"]
'/ ~
()
-, ~
"< CJ
~ :t..-
~ '--l -j
--.
~ ~ ~~1
::0 C/)
I---,. ;~
........ 0
C"") .. ~a,.
::t: ':2: ~
~ :t. VI ~;.; ~
......... ::n
a ...
'< CJ ~ ::~
:s <-:
~t:::J tJ ~ ..
"-l
~ ~l .,
..- CJ f.;)
~J "---l (I)
(J vi (".J r I ~
~.~ ... r) r.,
'/ -. :-
.......: J- t'.-~
~ C.I) ...., ~.~
c:: to=]
::0 ~)
~ ~I
~ \) ~;
-
a r.
;0
~
t..,
;r: .
~
~~
t::.l
'.,
f..J
:.:;
r.t.
Q:j,
o
())
I
o
.\
~-
{. ..
~t.~r[1'~:~;;~~~
() t& ~.- t -j j'
.~ ~~ ~-~. ,-:,..j
1t...... l' I ~ L~'(--
...--- ~
(-.. '-',
\. r- --j
----
~ .
t.:o ~ -
~~~ ~~
~ '0 t-~ ~ ~
:.... ~ ~ N "1 .,
\:::J ...... ~:. ~ ~ f'\.
t:1 Ol ~1 ~; ~:) ~.. '" ~
~ I ~ ~ ("ol ~ . i r.)'-~ r ~ ~ .
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . wl.~ . ,r.;,
r') ~ ~ C':.::I ~ d l;J ~ c" :..~ 1'\, ~
>1 'i- ~~ t"') '1 ~ ~~~ ~,.: ~I~ c~. t ~i
~ ~) S) ~ ~'" ~ ~ ~~ t~ ::~ t"-.' ~:
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~.~ ;.; ~~ t ~
~ R- ~ ~ {~i ~ ~ ~;'t..: t.i ~~ ~ ~
S. tQ c:j ~ ...'1 ...., ~, ~: ~.l ~.) t'r; ~~
?-i ~ :tJ t .. t"1 ~ - '.. .- . ~
t; ...... ... ~ : ~1 t::::I a. -t ~ r'- r, ~ l.. ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ill ~ g ;j ~i r~ ~ '~i
.:::j ~ ~ t-., r-~: . ,:-1
~ ~ ~ ~:1 ~.-!
"'":::: r ~ t.... (....J
~ ~....... :'3 ~~l :~~
~ ~~ t-.r~ ~ ~~
~:4~ {.!
....,
~ ~ 4111
11 J.
'l . .
fl.
~~ 1:,:-: ~ ~ ~ .'.
~:~ d ~ a..
lot ... ~ ,.-: ~ 3, ~ ()
, ..
=s:
:-0
~ ~ ~ I, ., i., ~
~ ~ : : . i ~ ~.: ~.& (j ';tj
~ ~
:.n f.I1
~ ~
tl'l ~
~ -.
~
-.
o
~~ :: :-: t: R ~ lii ; ~ ~ ~ 5 : :: t: t : -: ~ : :: ~ :: ;: : i :: = ~ ~ ':, : : J~ r- ~
... L~ . .II ... :t..~ ':::iI _ ~. " - a ~ .. . .: .. ... . <II ... ~;: ..... :;:t:.... Go'" tJ ~
._ ~ v ~~ ~.- ~. ~. ~
C)
~~~~~;).~=).s.~~ n,
.............~...""IlI...Il......I:_.......1I;"Ir;.-It... '1.-.... 'I ~
~- 2 ~ ~ i i ~ ; ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ; 2 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ;: ~ ~ f~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ :: ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~:: ~ ~ ~ e~ ~: :So ~I ~
. ~ ~ ~ ". " - ~ . . - -.. ... - . .. - - ,.. . -,~ ::,
~i;~~~~~=~~i~~~~~~:~:~~~~~~~!~:~:t
1
~ t
I
i
:~.cr';1;:cr1r::~Q~f;l:;r:!l~El:itf:I~'::-(:::.le I~r~~'lt~~"t,,~~~ ~:':'1S; .~u ~~~~"'C:'~~~~ .
~ ~ ~ ; ; ~ ~ ~ ; ~ ~ ; ; ; ~ ; ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ : ~ : ; ~ : ~ ~ ~ ~ : ~ ; ;;~ ~+ ~ :: ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ; ; : ~~ ~ ~C) I
. ./ . _ _ _ 1 _ . . ., _ .. . .. . ."., ... ~.. ., . · " . · · · , - , · . - · - ~ - -- - · · " · · '''':::''.
~ :~ ~ : ~ 5 :. ~ :' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ E ~ ~ E ~ ~ :. ~ :. :. :. : ~ : ~ ~; ':; ~.; ~ ~ ~ "~ ~ ~ I I~
~ ~ ~ \I,):;:
I ~ \. ~~ l
,:ti I
-- ': ' " ~ ~ : :: ~ i i :: ~ ': .;: :~ '; ., .; ~;~ ':.: ::: : ~ : ~: i ~ :~ ': ; : ~ ~ : ':.: S I
. ;~l
'. _I
-.
...... '
i
I
. :r -" ~ 1" .; ...
~
~~
l___--.
~
.. I ......
~ ~ ,~ ,~. I
-~ ~ ~ I I
_ i
- ni
t'~i
~ I
.. . r- 4
~ ~t
: tl"ll
.~
I"'r)
}/l
.~ ;- I (
. I
. f
, I
. l
I
.......
, ,-,
/
(~;
I..:
~
/
~ a,
I") ..
,5"-
-( .
- 1..
. .- I "
".Ip' " ~
~ .o.r:--.... J~
J. (;,
., _ AlA ref(
L ,'! ,'f.~
· .\T[ SHerr 2 )F
.... .... './. ,
.... .... .) ."'~ /)
.... ,"" .... .'#"....! /
.... '- I
.,f
t "
00
154
'* ."
...
~~) A-
I'
r - - - ._
,
j
t
- ,
"'\...
~
~ ~'-
t:j ......~
~ '<: ' .
..., t'2:....:;
~ ~...;
~ ::0'>
"":l ::0 V) ;::
~ ~ ~ 0
~ '<:
>:::t...lIJ
-.. -
~f)~
~ ::r: ~.
. ~ t,:,
-~~
~r,U)
~t:5VJ
...... 0
~ < .~
: ~.~ ~
~ c::~
Q ::Ovj
~ ~.
~ ~~
O<J
~.
VJ
~
0(
\I .
~
~
..
Q
';~.\ . .
\ \..-'
,..-A ,
.- \ '~~ ... #I
::. ~-l .-'VI ~ "_
\ , .
\' .
,\, "
, ,
OF 2 ~.
\ \ \'
\\ ~I
,I \'
,
,
,,=~
..~o
~!1
-a
tb~ =~
~~h- ~~
1""0~~ ~~
~ ~~~ ~~
~ ~~~ -.~
~ ~~ ;:;t::; ~
~ ~~~~~ ~~~~~~
_~ ~~s~ ~~~~~~~~
.-~ ~ r V"i 'i :... ~ ~ tj:, ~
r':I 'a ~~~~!"'-i~'
~ ~~:~~~~~~~~~ ~
~ S"'-I~ -~~~~;;;:.~,
~~~~~~~~~n;~~
:-ii\a~G'""".l::t..::~~ ~:s
~co~~~~:...'~~~ ~
V1 t;A:-o~~~~~~~!:;~~
~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~
r-- ~~~~~ ~~~~~"S
~ ~~ ~ ~~~~-~
....... ~~~ ~~~.
h ~~ ~:..;:
~ ~~,~ ~~
'" ~ .teI ~ ~ ~
~ ~~ ~~
:.: ~ ~~..~
\....
a t:~
!>t r~ ~
~ ~~i ~
~ -.A ?o3
f. r-.. ~;
~ ~
\
.,.
""',
l~~i
~,~~
-=. Oliil
G'\
~-
~
.(
,-.
...
~.I
I~
:/
~
I ...
. ..
....
...
.....
...
~/
.~-/
).~../
~/
~ .
/
e
I.
~ s -s.~
i ~ I
~ i ~
... t: t! \';I
~ ~ ;
~ ~ ..
_... r-
l I ~
. ~
l"l
l
I
I
~
~
"3
~
'S
~
~
~
~~~U .~ll
i i ~ i ~fi:; ; '! :. ~ i, \~
~~~;' 1$ :;;~ ~
. It)
.- ~~ t(: ~ ~d- ~
i '8 .: "~._~j,, : : ;;:: ; l03l~
,.tl'll: !o I \ .
; !~ ! I~
::0 I IV)
;~ l !~
ill1 Il~
~ !~ 1""'1
l~
I~ 11
~ee~t'4~e4~,:!.~.::tl~i):~~e~lbl~
...~~~.~.~~_~~_~~~~~M~_~.~~_~.~MM-
~~~~~=It=::~~:~~-~~~~:~~~:=~~~~~~~
_~~~.G~t~Y~~~.~~.2.t~~b~~ti22.t..:1
~~~~~~~;~~~~~~:~S~~~~~~.:::~~~~ ~:~~;1 C)
. ~ l~
~ii~~~~~~~;iii;~~;iE~;~~~~~~~~~~~~!~j~
~~~~Jt~ ~
..........P_.... ~ ao- P II' If... ~...., r~ ....lI' II" ~ It liIlt It ~ Ir~ ~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~;~~~~~~~!!~~~~ ~r,i
I-.e--w~~~.-~t~~------~.~~- ;---~
~e':::~~~~;;~~~~;;iii~;~:;i;~~e~;
~~i ,.1-1-' ~~~ I: ':~Gli.-l;~'IJ:te!ijGtiv=~::~~ ~
~~_.~~_~.~~"~~~..~M._.......,~......"=".~~_M_.---~
i;:~~i;2~~~:~~!!ii~:~~~~=i~!~!!!::I~l:(=~:~~~~;:i~I~~
~~~~~~:~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~:~:~:~ : ~~~:~ .~~~
...............,.......,..........110....... I I i ~~
. . I ~
_:~==k.:~~:~~~~cew~~~:;~~-:~:~~~'eE'II.c.i~r!..~~eR~
~.~..~.~~~_2_.~~~-~-.~_t:nS~._~~a.h-~1I.1'.lt..~~=~~latA
r~ av~ .~!-e~-.tt. ~z-: I~. .~ ~
, ~ ;: ... ~~
-. & -t
o 155
------ ..~ .--.-....
----- - ...~'-
d,~ E~ 15~b~
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
j"'1 Ir]
MEETING DATE: March 11, 1992
ITEM NUMBER:
6.E.lS.b.
SUBJECT: Request to Quitclaim Easements no longer necessary in
conjunction with the Genito Estates Sewer Project
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR' S COMMENTS:
Re,~J ,411^~
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
R. E. Collier Inc., has requested the vacation of portions of a
variable width sewer easement and a 10' temporary construction
easement, across lot 5, block D, Genito Estates, Section B, and lots 1
and 2, Genito Estates, Section A, Resub. of lot 1, block D, dedicated
in deed book 2133 at page 1957. Also, R. E. Collier, Inc., -and Lois Y.
Wilkinson have requested the vacation of a 16' sewer easement and two
101 temporary construction easements, across lots 5 and 5B, block D,
Genito Estates, Section B and lots 1 and 2, Genito Estates, Section A,
Resub. of Lot 1~ block D, dedicated in Deed Book 1962, at page 1686,.
and in Deed Book 1964 at page 173. These easements and portions of
easement are no longer necessary due to the dedication of new easements
for the Genito Estates Sewer Project. This 'request has been reviewed
by staff and approval is recommended.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the Board authorize the Chairman of the Board and
County Administrator to execute quitclaim deeds to vacate the easements
to the owners.
DISTRICT: Clover Hill
ATTACHMENTS: YES II NO C
~EFMED B~ h J~
~
John W. Harmon
Property Mgmt. Supervisor
Right of Way Division
Department of utilities
SIGNAT URE :
~
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
00 156
805-9891
VICINITY SKETCH
C.. REQUEST BY L. rAAUDLE AND R. E. COLLIER,Ac., TO QUITCLAIM
EASEMENTS IN CON.CTION WITH THE GENITO ESWTES SEWER PROJECT
(I
,-.
(..."
.--'
/~ .
"..---- ,
:a.L. ---:\" ~ . n-..... J ::t. :"'~...-...J...L.~:... i
'I
!
If
00
157
~...
(I
a
<{
o
it
>--
W
~
~~
2 1:t-
i 8
~
· tn
o -
Vl
t
5
POi2.."ON 0 r E"A.5E H E..tJ.T
TO E" ,... c.A \'tC. u
R. &:. <:"0 l. L f E" .1 IN C .
DB. '''113 p~. Ie:02.
4e-12 (4)-B-D-S
pR.OPOse D VA",'-"Sl...5 W1t:.Tl'\ ~w
S QWC.~ ......N 0 '0' CIOi........,..."-..ac:, .,.,0.... t--
--- ^' 60. oS' -.......
---~-__ CS 'lo- k.r -
__ -~-___ t5.6S"
--- -.- ----
-....-...
tv 60.
o~,
SO....\.y
~
N
.
9
z
~
---.
---
--.
LOl
Lor
o
t{
- ------ ~
E~:~::G:~~~ 1 @
tq: C; ~~ ~~~t.)_C;TI~tL}~~~!i M~~! _ - >
1, 5 ~e: IS!! () t5.oOi( I~--+ PAC!iC 1'13 <
5 e DE.~ b I!l.oo...;, t..,.. 2.. p......e c. '~6G t.. I
1.I [!
~ ~
Z
S
~
56
-.~-
---
LOIS Y. \N'L..KINSoN
DEI. 1370 P6, e. 13
-1(. ~'2('-+)-B-D-SB
4
GE N I TO
ESTATES
R. E. co L LIe. R ; . Nc:..
ce. 118.9 P" 1202.
4e -t 2. (:O-A - b-I
SEC.8 BLK. D
SEC. A Blk. D
leo,oo~
110.00'
S 7'1- 33'''3 lOW' -l-
PLAT SIH)t~ I ~U: V AR I AnLE \~ I nTH SEl.JER
RASf'lIENT AND J o. CONSTRUCT J ON EASEHRNT,
CLOVER 111 LL U I STR 1 CT I CUESTERFl EI.n COUNTY t V I RG lNIA
D;Hll for thls (llnt lakp.u from
Cen t (n F.s t n tes "Au Sewer
ExtcnRlon Plan by J. K~ Tlnunons &:
^ ~ !i ,,(' . i P. c. t d n t ~ d I I - 1'1- 90 .
UTILITIES DEPARTMENT
CHESTE R FIELD COU NTY VIRGINIA
s CAL!. 0fUM'N IV
It' == 50' 0 t>R5
0lIl.... tt .
o 158
.....
e
e
.~ .
\: .t-
I
OWNER: L.L. CAUDLE
08. 1135 PC. J40
SEe nON ~A I
~
~
~
o PERMANEN T
o TEMPORARY
WlNTERH
(i:l7~t;f~ COURT
PLAF SHOfYIHC A /6 I S.FlYZR EASZHE.N7' &
10 ~ CONSTRUCTION ffASE'UEN7:5' ACROSS rHg
PROPKR7'Y OF L_L- CAUIJLZ
TAX MAP NO.: 48-12(3)10 ~ (4)50
CLoveR HILL DISTRICT
CHESTE:RFIE~D COUNT(, VIRGINIA
J:K l'LVUOHS & A9S0CfATES, PC:
S.NCINESRS ",. SURV.nv.as - PLtNH.l'RS
nl N. COURTHOUSE RD. RICHMOND. VA
8803 STA.PLES MILL RD. HENRICO co.~ VA
2430 PACEJ-IURST DRIVE UIDLOTHIAN, VA
411 E. 8ROADW~ r HOP8'IaL. VA
0..4 TF:: 4- 28- dB SCALE.. I · ~ f 00'
ORA YfN BY: G..$: G. DESIGN BY: G.S.G.
CHECKeD BY..c;....!./C- CALC CHK...
JOB NO.: 50179-2
: PRE:VIQUS JOB NO.
15.
u ' E , /~ ~
....
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPE RV I SORS
AGE NDA
/
March 11, 1992
MEETING DATE:
ITEM NUMBER:
6.E.16.
SUBJECT: Request from Danbur Properties, Inc., to Aid in Acquiring
a Sewer Easement
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: ~
IJ~~ ~ 1~'~~ ~ -': ~ c.~
~~AM J5 ~ ~{:;;Jdu ~ ~
~ o.J- ~~ 1 ~ ~. .
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
Mr. James V. Daniels of Danbur Properties, Inc., requests aid in
acquiring a sewer easement across the property of Bettie J. Preston,
et aI, to serve Winfree Colony, a new subdivision located west of
Petersburg Street and north of Ashton Creek.
It has been the policy of the County to assist developers to obtain
water and/or sewer easements if the developer, after making
re a sonab Ie e f for.t s ,. is unabl e to acqu ire the nece s s ary ea semen t .
The Board may use its power of Eminent Domain if staff is unable to
negotiate a reasonable settlement. The developer is responsible to
reimburse the County for the expenses incurred to obtain the
easement.
BACKGROUND:
Mr. Daniels attempted to acquire the entire 3.36 acres for inclusion
in his proposed subdivision. When this failed, he made an offer of
$1000.00 to purchase the sewer easement consisting of 0.10 acre in
ATTACHMENTS: YES II
NO D
PREPARED BY; ~~~tr ~
. l'
John T. Hewitt
Acquisitions Supervisor
Right of Way Division
Department of Utilities
SIGNATURE =
..~
COUNTY ADM I NI STRATOR 0 0
BOS~9891
.. e.
e
".
Agenda Item
March 11, 1992
Page 2
permanent easement' and 0.13 acre in temporary construction easement.
The offer was made by certified mail on January 31, 1992. None of
the QvJ'ners responded.
The sewer easement will allow sewer service to be extended to the 23
lots in Winfree Colony and will benefi t the Preston property when
developed.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recorrunends that the Board authorize the Acquisitions
Supervisor to aid Mr. Daniels in acquiring this easement, subject to
Danbur Properties, Inc. I executing' a contract agreeing to pay for
all the cost involved in the acquisition.
DISTRICT:
Bermuda
00 161.
VICINITY SKETCH
FROM DANBUR PROPER TIE
NC.
-'. 7;.^-
. ~oI""..rti
~Jy
E~ (.n~ ~1t
ftJ w i:~ , ~.!
00
162
II. ~
~
GAY FARMS
SECT10N 6
8
c
365/508.348
If 795263.404
--
EX. IS" SE';;- - - -
08 123SEpR EASEMENT
Q. 262
5
J-
Z
W
~
W
U)
"..........<[ vi
w "0
z .....:1'<}
0 CN
~ 20
u O.
J
W 0: ~g
~
OM Ul U)o
Z WI~
ov 0 0.: 0 If)
NN U
.0) 0... 9 N
{ON r-
OO 0:: . (5 .
z <:( J,~
0:: W ~fil
0
n. - I
~ f- to 0
w r :::::- Q)
r- W ~CD
ffil-o
CHESTERMILL
BLOCK A
6
189.33' ALONG P Il OF LOT
TO THE WESTERN R/W OF :E.:ELROS~G ;~ESTER MfLL
4'4.46' AL ONG THE' WESTERN R/W OF P I THENCE.
TO THE SOUT ETERSBURG S T
PETERSBURG ~fEST INTERSECTJON OF DANIELS ST. AND
----. '
\
S 03-24'53" E --
J~L. _LONGEST 8. R.M. PHJLLrpS
TM H6-J3-0r-OO-OOO-002
DB 646 Pg. 256
..:_:1 i~~\ ~-:~i:'L:{!f<>(~~~t:~t
- -" . If: f,.ct.: T I'~;Y/' n
./~/i':~~:'~~:n .;'~> ~;._
\'/~.'~'.'~.~-;:~ \ ,.. /1 d/(l ~'0.../--;J
~J..' / / \..-l- -~
<< ...... - .
// "c. '.':._ 0' _.~1 ~
- - !.' ~~! [::_!~;>.,-'./.,
PLAT
OF
16~ SANJT ARY SEWER EASEMENT 8,
10' TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT
BERMUDA DISTRICT
CHES TERFIELD COUNTY. VJRGIN'A
ATTN.
SCALE: In ::: 50. DE CEMBER 10. 1991
CHARLES C. TOWNES 1 ASSOC1A TES. P .c.
CIVL ENGINEERS PLANNERS LAtIl SUAVE YOR S
RICHMOND VIRGINIA
DRAWN BY RCE CHECKED BY F /8
COMPUTED BY APPROVED ~'J15r TIM 0 0 16 3
~ ..
(P ( E f /7 Cl t
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVI SORS
AGENDA
MEETING DATE: March 11, 1992
ITEM NUMBER:
6.E.17.a.
SUBJECT: Acceptance of a Parcel of Land along U. S. Route 1 from The
Southland Employees' Trust
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
Re,~~ A~~
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
Staff requests the Board to accept the conveyance of a parcel of
land, containing 0 . 014 acre, a long U. S ~ Route 1 f rom The Southland
Employees' Trust, and to authorize the County Administrator to execute
the necessary deed.
BACKGROUND:
It is the poliqy of the County to acquire right of way whenever
possible through development to meet -the ultimate road width as.
shown on the County Thoroughfare Plan. The dedication of this
parcel conforms to that plan, and will decrease the right of way
costs for road improvements when constructed."
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the Board accept the conveyance of this parcel
and authorize the County Administrator to execute the necessary
deed.
DISTRICT: Matoaca
PREPARED BY.
ATTACHMENTS: YES'
NO 0
Joh T. Hewitt
ACqUl tions 'Super sor
Right of Way Division
Department of Utilities
SIGNATURE;
~
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
00 164
BOS-9891
.!,-.
,~ ACCEPTANCE 0
~ "I.
."\1.; , I r),.,
I ..... .....
.. .)..
, ...l,)'" o~~.....{
~<"k";Q
'\. ...t.~~..t "',.r(".,.
.\ v( (O~1.
~ ~~
,0;,.
,fI .
....... 0;, F
-$;
~ (\
7 iJ
"A,
133
r~
,.~
'\t
'1
I, IJ t. ~~ r...JW"ooo qO
?: ~,..:.qTI~~G.lLE RO_
~,;',...)QI ~ €: ~ QO,
I
I
I. ,
( 1
.,
I>,
r;;:UI
~'._~\. ~
.... ....,~
"...~ :". .
...." "(
.,~-' ~~
, ". .. "-:~;~ f,
"'~('o, .....).~.
\\
";~ \
,p";}~~ ~~, \
..~O ("loA \. \ ~
po. "'"------.....
, ... ~'~
~~ ') lj t'.J t
BE.~M (IDA
.-9 VN ..1 Q r S
M' ....H~. S
-:-~
.to
~ r
c: ~;";~-:;l \ '
~.~
'" l).
l:'I
......
I
~
~
@Ql}
?
oJ'
(" .-
~.
19(Jpr:-
If I
j i a. S I
'''''/((
\
\" 'O~
- ..... -'"\ (?
\ ~..)
.t.L':.....lS:)
::: .- E: .,..,. C .:l" l...
~ESE"A~Ct-o
,
\ l.-tJ.:3S
... ..... ,.....'\,- .....--...
"
,
\
\
\
\
......
/
~ff
\ ~ /
\ ~~ ,::.:~"'"
.... ~\:" -
~ ,- -
8tl :oCO. ' '2 . :::-"
.- (Q \
,1: I '
E /Y ,
;:~I ~
I _.101_ \
.::: .,:: _ ,::- :: ~ ~ i ':""
f ~I
t-~. l;'~~
~I
:tj :
.....
(
I
\
('
'----)
I
t
../
~
1'""T;
:::0
In
\Xl
c:
/
~I/)
!t'\
\ ,\
\\\ ~
,~\~~
\ z \~
~ (l" ,
/
v'~;' -
I~,fl I~I:"":. ,:
.; \ ':'lo - ~ '- ~ -; ~.:
:...::-
<~...
............ ,j
......... F ....
<::'" I ,~
.........../..:::
I
t
t
\
'",
.'"
~?
" c::;-'~) )1
~ \ __r!(~
~.- 'Ir
V~~~;r
~. } - .,,-J ..... -=:/1
-'/'~ '---- \
Ii ~~"\~ 0 ~!f{~
\\,:, ~ ,;' // i ~ I
~ \, , ..~. l.
~::
/ J
I
I
.......-
"-'....
"\<'-
/
/
..:.v.,~
~o/
-/k.~ ~ 4
.'Yo
/
/
/
I
f
,.-
. r1-
'i'
~r-, ,-.
-,-- ~l~;f~~'-'~ .
/ /!;~7"
~,
~ ~ ~
CO \\\
~
c
,............
'\
C
::J
\-
------
----
=-"
\
~lIo\R'C X OR~
~.
Q
it
, ~c
\. I hQ:-
rL
~ t
~ '\
.1 ", 1\' '\ n
~ _ ,J ,\:, U
\"
~ '.
.~
~
w
00
:N
165
'l:'
tJj /
?J fJ . jl Idr'
k't / Jr' CL//I-;;S r ~ /
~\/~D fli' __
~:/e ~ ~f.1 / .-'"
A' ./U). ~ - 'l~ yv~ I
6J..j0 ~O/()IJ/ ' -;'8;1
1~DD I /80. ~&t;;
~/ 6 ~ (3 v~/){J
~\J G ~~~ftf'~
\l' 4 ;J1~utl
~ /fI/-S/ fJ;J.
,-
AF' q (,620
~
~
'tt\
~
~
~
~
~
e
e
- ~ "i'f
'llt,hLTJ/ O.J~
()~ t/:,
~\.:. ,.~. J h
:;r C' ~
~. "~Rl '. no " ~J~
~ II' r No. ;.. ~
1'(+
tA1- 0 t
.}1 4."
"l':,/~I .J+ ....
I!- \) t- ,,".
~~ I:A Nt) ~ ...,IT
'L.. ~"" _~~............--
:fbv;l/7/a/7d E~k9'6'6'6'
"7/-:
,04 /a1/~ /j'. 3'5ciJ
./a'K /Vr~/ /I/o. /-1Z9-/1'l)8
'"
~
\
~
"
~
~
Ch.
~'\ .
~
'\
t
~
~ ~ I
~ ~1
~\S
~~
&/4 /?t1. ~ j!"x./j.1: I
;},~ .1J dd ~ ~ /()' ,e0~;11.9~8
/Afdfi:PlerY , ~ ~ ,t?g'.891,1l)'
~8 q/ ,~ ,
__ Z()5~'5~ . .
0'-P;58' ,A/ ~~ ' ,
/&~ G1~ :;.... A/ /~ 4~5 5cJ ~ ~ 6/S77 /f7H/
6l~j}(
,I. 1
~~"~. .
tJ;/; ~D
~ ~800 I
~ r ,
~/ :f1otJJ1///Tf /P-&t2 7t3 & .o6'o}~L1r6'd ;S
C~6":i'/6',,-/J6'/d' c:bU/77 &rt:?6'.1' m6' #~/~
a/ .:1.b.v/--7.0.1n~Y C~-0Y6'ef:? 7/: .m /0& Ah/t1U'~a
L?:i/r;"y 67/ ~c&&r&/rJ6'Y ~0'/7~ Jf'i//7/4.
b: ~ A't:Jur€ /
(6/6'/ ./6/7c2bk Md/h M(/)
( ~/~/mar6' /Zt1 '~){/)
.:?&/k/770&/ /2; /99/
2C4'k~~ /'~ 40 ~
llUIJlE. 'fA YL()U ANI) JJUHYEA n~ INC.
ENGtNEERS AND &URVEYOnG
~ '1 nUi EARC H ROAD
ntCnMO"'~O. VHtGINIA 2323~
rA/ 5/LJ~tJ/
00 166
.--\
&,. Ei /1 bf
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGE NOA
MEETING DATE: March 11, 1992
ITEM NUMBER:
6.E.17.b.
SUBJECT: Acceptance of a Parcel of Land along Rhodes Lane, State Route
631, from Ronald C. and Sarah Marie W. Jeffers
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR- S COMMENTS:
R~~ A~
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
Staff requests the Board to accept the conveyance of a parcel of land
along Rhodes Lane, from Ronald C. and Sarah Marie W. Jeffers, and to
authorize the County Administrator to execute the necessary deed.
BACKGROUND:
Rhodes Lane has been included in the Virginia Department of
Transportation's. six year construction program. The dedication of this
parcel conforms "to that plan, and will decrease the right of way costs
for road improveme.nts when constructed. .
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the Board accept the conveyance of this parcel
and authorize the County Administrator to execute the necessary deed.
DISTRICT: Matoaca
PREPARED BY~
ATTACHMENTS: YES II
NO C
oh T. Hewitt
Acquis. ions Superv sar
Right of Way Division
Department of Utilities
, ,
SIGNATURE:
~
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
00
805-9891
'f
.1
_I ·
VICINITY SKETCH
EL OF LAND ALONG RHOD
STATE ROUTE 631
!
-.
l.n
x
~C/
~;
~ '
o i
J
1
t
~
. i
r
~
i
~
.(-jl
I ~
j -
. !
, - . -...
-. : ol
00 168
ACCEPTANCE
VICINITY SKETCH
eEL OF LAND ALONG RIl
ii
x
~OI'
:.7..
26
~ .
i
I
- "I
I~
1 "
\
~ - -----
I.. 1-
00 168
fa, r;. /7. b.
l, i ~ ~ /7, {!.
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
...1 .
MEETING DATE: March 11, 1992
ITEM NUMBER:
6.E.17.c.
SUBJECT: Acceptance of a Parcel of Land along Woodpecker Road from
Oliver D. Rudy, Trustee
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR' 5 COMMENTS:
Re~J
f.)ff'l~
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
Staff requests the Board to accept the conveyance of a parcel of land
containing 1.275 acres along Woodpecker Road from Oliver D. Rudy,
Tr~stee under the provisions of a certain trust agreement dated March
20, 1988, and designated Nash Road/Woodpecker Road Trust Agreement, and
to authorize the County Administrator to execute the necessary deed.
BACKGROUND:
This dedication 'is a zoning requirement .for the Highlands Development.
and meets the ultimate road width for the County Thoroughfare Plan.
Some improvements will be made by the developer and right of way costs
will be decreased for future improvements. '
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff reconunends that the Board accept the conveyance of this parcel
and authorize the County Administrator to execute the necessary deed.
DISTRICT: Matoaca
ATTACHMENTS: YES II
NO C
PREPAREOClN~
John W. Harmon
Property Mgmt. Supervisor
Right of Way Division
Department of Utilities '
SIGNATURE:
~
COUNTY ADMIN1STRATOR
00
BOS-9891
,-
:~1
.a VICINITY SKETCH ~
ACC~PTANCE OF ;WARCEL OF LAND ALONG WO~CKER ROAD FROM
c..
fir sot
--r------- \.
t" ~.
~ \ /ce~
~ /L_. _./~
.-~t 1.,..
l "
1_~ Branch
i i ~ -~_. -" ,-"-",--
~
i
I
I
. I
I --1'
I~/ '\
) ~
~- .-.
\__ r ,__)f
--
~~
~
,- -
.::, '\:.
~'
:~.
---- '
~~.
~
~('l
,0
~~
j ~_" " ,r--'
L akuWar.garei -- ........,-
~ -'---7-- -'.. ',- '. !
.~"'""7' "/___-", :
-----"
./ ;
.~/ :
X:y
7" '
// !
J
._._._._ .., - . ------ ,. --- --- .----..------.--. -.-~~~-$t-..-
j'
. I
i/
~
~
J
- -~-I
i
I
~~- .-. -~:..~-\ .-'cr---:-._. ~
------~.. - ~-l
...; .- l
.-....
-=~~ ;
..... ---'"
'^-r--..-
('- :
~.
~
~~..- :
_',~.t:,:~~ .
-,"oJ -.
:'-:.V
:1~"t-f~'~
.~~' f-~?" '.~ . '~:i;;.-:i
\.
RffDy
.,,0,
~~.
,
I
I
I
i
I
If
00 170 -
-1
Q~
, "
.
':.<::V1~CbQ)01:l.tI
~~~~~~5 %
~~~~~q~
~~~ ~f')
f\.I ~~
~~
(;}Q
qCl;
;0
<.U tM loA ("." ('" IQ 0-. ~
~.2.~.~~~~
()
~
tI:l
:-<:
~
<
~~
:.....--..
""'!. ~!
ci
a
b
~
~
~
~
~
b
~~
l\):h
-....J~
01r)
~~
C)
~::
~t:o
(I) ::
&)
~
r';t
~
Q
("'.
~j
hi
'II
0).
tu
0)
Co,)
Cl
~
~
0'
, t
j l
I I
I ,
I j
r ,
j 1
r I
j I
, j
J ,
j I
I j
j ,
, I
I ,
I j
j ,
- I ( t< ~ - ----.- - ----------.
r I cRfJ .-~~~---
Jr~
l~j .
r j
j
(j'). ~N
C") ;l... CIJ 0,
~b~~
2S2~1+
~~~~
~;<:oQ
~bd~
:-u
hlo
::>(t::
-o~
).. ,tl
~9
~:! ~
~0
-,~';;:
~~
2~
.~. r;.t
L.I ".
g~
~~~
)o:;Q)~
~a()
~~g
~iE~
9~~
::;:- ~
wll
. b::O
0;:;:;:(;)0
! f'l ~
L.liij.
co :-1
w,.:b
~
~1
'.I
_f~~l '0~ ~\
1~ \p'
') ~
/
E8
~Sl ..
~p .,
~~
,~
-.""<.
~)j
--:)c:
........{J)
!.ft1
L.,j n.
I -520 9tJt R-22Dj-OO.
rv26 I, 71' tJo. rJ'J2'~8~
~~
':n,.
~~
or)
~
~t-.
tJ..
~~..
D:j-
U)~
l-f~ 00'
.-s JI.'6'26 W
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
/
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
f
I
I
I
I
I
I
/
,
I
I
I
.--j
fi!)~
~
r
..... "
,.. o..J'
v~
~ ',p
~~- ~~
q. +"'d'
oS'Jb::'Cb.
"'0..
VI
~
......c
~<.,;
8 ....
.f"l
~e
~Si
~~
r-::tJ
'6
-. .--.c
~~
:::-c:.
...........<.1)
~M
wtli
00
171
~
C)
~
&:: b
~ ~ ~
~~ b a b
);..
~?>: 4 r) ~~O)
~ ~ QV)~
~~ t:J ~l:10)
):.. -.
;cV]~ VJ
?i ~ ~~'-l~
~.o ~ b~Cl1~
~ ~ ........
~).. N C"l C1 ~
~~:t.. .'J ~ ~t:t:J~~
~~~ to * Ot--tC"J
l;,Q ~ tJ) ~ VJ
""-l a CJ ~~
~t"'])...
""'--4'1r., V:l ~ :V)a
~~~ CI) ~ ~~a~
(] ~
2~q ):... :u V) :;~~
t-o
),.Vj~ ~ '"J-.l h3 .?;
10-...,
c-:~ ~ ~~~~
~0} b
..." b ::t:..
~~ C") ~ :>
t'oJ a ~ttJ8
0(") gs ~~
~'
lI.l ~::j ~
~~ b
-:;:: Cl
~
a
;-. ~
~ ~
0)
N
W
'>J
0
I
.......
(Pt€~ I?d.
....
I
f
,.
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVI SORS
AGENDA
MEETING DATE: March 11, 1992
6.E.17.d.
ITEM NUMBER:
SUBJECT: Acceptance of a Parcel of Land from Oliver D. Rudy, Trustee
COUNTY ADMINISTRATORt S COMMENTS:
R~ t+'f'i~
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
Staff requests the Board to accept the conveyance of a parcel of land
on Woodpecker Road containing 59.300 acres from Oliver D. Rudy, Trustee
under the provisions of a certain trust agreement dated March 20, 1988,
and designated Nash/Woodpecker Road Trust agreement, and authorize the
County Administrator to execute the necessary de'ed.
The dedication of this parcel is a requirement of Planning for the
Highlands Development
RECOMMENDATIONS:
Staff recommends that the Board accept the conveyance of this parcel
and authorize the County Administrator to execute the necessary deed.
DISTRICT: Matoaca
PREPARED
ATTACHMENTS: YES II
John W. Harmon
Property Mgmt. Supervisor
Right of Way Division
Department of Utilities
NO C
SIGNATURE:
~
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
00
BOS~9891
J'
_ VICINITY SKETCH ~
!fACCEPTANCE OF A.ReEL OF LAND FROM OLIV~. RUDY, TRUSTEE
first
''"'
\
\.".
I \ -~~-i: ·
L \.... ~..->:
~_.. ~ ~, ';f
i
~- .l}T.-'!!J.c~
;j .- -'-
. j I
'.-...../.,,)
i
I
I
l
~ j
[ .;-)",
~J . ') ~
'---- -
--
+
-~~
~
,- -
~
~'
~
~
l"Oc--
,0
~~
r' :-
t~. ~.,
Lak~ar.ga'-et'" -~--,
~# -...........~ ..... '",
~------.
.' .-:::.~ ..............._-. :
,,/" l
~-- ,
I
l
I
i
,_. - -- '-1
f
!
~
....~
.k~
~~.
y
// :
. _ _ _n _ _ _ __ _ ~ _ _. ___:.~. _ ___ __~~.__-.._ : _ _ _____ ,j;~/~_ n_ _ _~ ;''t'~<-'':: /-'-.-~'"2. _~:~'-' __ "~':':-_;'7: j
Ii - \
/1 .' __;.f ~
,II' ~~; '.::::'~:". t-d' '~ ~i \
# MEOr I
~:----
\.;:
~,
~
~"~' i
N
00 173
C"I
~
tu
:-:c:
1
t
t't']
~;-.
~~
r:;~
~~~
~.o
~ ~
k:~CI)
Q~~
8~~
. ~ tj
-..::~;t...
......C)lJ:l
~~~
~-Q
........ )...
~V)~
~~
~.
~:-n
~~
V}
~
~
Ol
f\J
~
~~
Cl
I
"'"
;-.
...
r
~
~l<I~~~:otlll
': L~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ %
~~.3~~~.~
~"1~ ~~
~~"'1 ~f""Ij.
l\.:I t<~
y.~
00
qq
~~~~~~;::~
.~. ~t ~ ~ ~. ~ ti1
~ ~ ~I
:..~ ~
'!. '!
~
a
to
D:j
~b
~~
~~~~O)
~~;2C1)~
~~~~C'.J1
~"'"1~~"'-1~
~~b~CJl~
.~Q~~~~
C:OilOr:-.CJ
~~Cju)~UJ
~ ~ :V)~
~~t:tJ~a~
l;-i :lJ CI) :: ~ ~
~ ~ ~ "-J ~
.- ~ ~ no ".......
t"-1 ~ r...- t-. .... .I
H" b ~ .. ~
N 8 ~ ta"~b
c ~ ......J ...
0. ~ t"-t ..
;10
~()
a
~
~
~
.
::0
~
C)
b
~
C)
F:;
~
:tJ
!2
b
~~
lU~
"1~
tr)CJ
):..~
CJ
?J;
~to
(I] ;:
V)
'"'i
;t..
r"::
~
Q
t:
~
hJ
~
O:l
l\)
0)
(.,,)
C)
~
~
Ee
~~ .
~p
~::o
,~
-~"""'<
~~
::--c:
. 'IV)
~~
l ~!j2o. SIB' R..220,).00'
r 0= 261. n . &- U "J2 58
D~
fr)h
...... [Il lJ)
hl:i;:r:
~Il)~
~gg
1I:';'t)
:o?:iD;:g
9~~~
:::::. .:ti
l..l'll
lh.::t)
!~g
....Qi
~~
V)
-1
~~
.~
w~
Q(J
a~
)::;..t-.
C'")~
~~
~~.
C/).
6'
f I
j r
I j
, ,
I j
r ,
j l
I I
I j
J I
I j
r I
j j
l ,
j j
I r
I l
I I
j I _-"- - -.-- -- --______ .
: l~i c~ft~ ------- - _
I f
I j
j ~
(I) :tJ N
() ~- t~ Crl
~bV) .
2~~~
~~~4
~~bQ
~~d~
:-0
~o
::..:t:
"tl~
J:,.. :Q
~~h:l
rl"}
r- ::tI
~~
..... .~(
l~~
.~~~
"'- V)
-~. ft1
~lll
j
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
j
I
I
I
I
j
I
/
I
I
I
I
_._ _J
!i!)~
~
'''OJ DO'
- !i 31.r6 '20 W
I
I
I'
I
I'
/
I
I
I
/
VI
~
~5
Q'"
Q .
~
I
~a
),;:t:
~~
~~
PJ:u
'5
- ~"<
~~
~c:
"-111
.!.~
~nl
00
174
(P4!C, /3,
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVI SORS
AGENDA
MEETING DATE: M3.rch 111 1992
ITEM NUMBER:
6.E.18.
SUBJECT; Conveyance of an Easement to Virginia Electric and Power
Company
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR' 5 COMMENTS:
RUA~ A~.
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
Staff requests the Board to authorize the Chairman of the Board and the
County Administrator to execute an easement agreement with Virginia
Electric and Power Company to install overhead cable within variable
width and 20' easements at the Thelma Crenshaw Elementary School. This
request is for relocation of facilities due to the Route. 654 Bailey
Bridge Road Project. This has been reviewed by staff and approval is
recommended. ·
RECOMMENDATION: .
Staff recommends that the Board authorize the Chairman of the Board and
the County Administrator to execute the. easement agreement with
Virginia Electric and Power Company for overhead cable within variable
width and 20' easements at the Thelma Crenshaw Elementary School.
DISTRICT: Matoaca
PREPARED
fP Jd-~
ATTACHMENTS: YES II
NO D
Jo n W. Harmon
Property Mgmt. Supervisor
Right of Way Division
Department of Utilities
SIGNAT URE :
~
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
00 175
BOS-9891
~.
A VICINITY SKETCH .
CONVEYANCE OF AN .,SEMENT TO VIRGINIA ELEC AND POWER COMPANY
. AT THELMA CRENSHAW ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
"-
~
C',../- . f1...... C'r
I J~ \~.- ~~~~M ! -i?
'; ... ~ .,!iIT 0-': ~ r. ~() l ^
;: ~so~j ~ ~
';J:l n.1 ~ '\~
'AMj .. LJ ~r-'~r.'7 ~'t j~ \~
~!. -A --.:;: ;\~
I ~'l.:: I fit i~\
i Richmond ./ \ QUA lLA
/' ; i1;; FARMS
.\
'G.:~\
;5.\
u_ _______,.\__:_________--:- ~
\~Ol'"
~ ....-11
(~~.~ .~""J
I .,"'v
.~!fl )
..~':i' /1
. ',.{i
/tfi'
~~
"""';'0
~l
k1i
fl
. ~-t I
~\
__ d's.; . \
-..:::;:::...." \
I~'-.:'~t j":~~~~.,~i,:::!:.' /~~~~_-(.!" ,...~, r., ....!~
It .,(.: 1"" L.rr~l \. ~-::."f:" L,t~ f' ^ ..D 0 C. 'A.
~' ,/:r(" ('::;':'..,1 "'. (~~..-'....'..~..t~ ~~~, :.\,(:&'.' :... ~ .:
II '("{-. ~ ~- - \ (~.,.'I~~J\ [ I' _ ('. { ;',r. ,. .
J ~:,-;-,",.,-~ uti ~.~ ' I:;..,~<...~~.f,-i' r r'-':'-: -t-,-r{-_;;i- ~l
.. _~l~~{.r~St;(1f.:'-. _.f;/;~J.~~~!Ff~:;.:;~f;~~;) ~I
~kFf:.r. 71~:;-'L:_:;-..: r0:f--c 'J ',:- ~((C-~rfiaI8 M i
, .~ I t~...r - r~ '\-:..r It{ .' ;. : '-, · '~.'.. !:< - _t ~~. ~ I~:.. f- r., \..., >, ~. " :~ Pac I
i ! ~
Ii
I
paCAHONTA~
! "" CRE "i
I . -\ OJ.~ -9-
~j
I.
I
H
.....--.....
r
1
~
\l\"
~
. ,
'\ P
tl..._~~~
- i .\"'~
\
'}~ I
-' '\..
'~ I
~
'~\,
00
If
176
,.
e
Rt 651
Claypoint
Road
20'
e
County of Chesterfield
(003, 049)
;
~
Legend
NO SCALE
_ _ Location of Boundary Unes of Right of Way
FOtm No. 12048;C:Jln 891
{FOf I'1'WK I"f 975S6030}
Page _ of _
jO'I"'I' "'1
j (~-~, /:-..; .- ~-:~ t3 1
I ::""'IL'L\LS . ~
VDOT 0651-020-266, C501
.
Plat to Accompany
Right of Way Agreement
COR 16
.......1I'OInII
VlI'ginia Bectric and Power Company
District
CHESTERFIELD
DIstrict- Townsh Ip-BorO\JQh
Clover Hill
Office
Central Division
Estimate Number
07-009-202
Date J -'8 -9 I By C Uh CL
County-C1ty .
Chesterfield
Plat Number
0090-0402
Grid Number
L2144
CC (..A{ '-
State
VA
BOS-9891
14 /I.
,I ~
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
MEETING DATE: March 11, 1992
7.A.
ITEM NUMBER;
SUBJECT;
DEFERRED APPOINTMENTS
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR1S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
Nominations/appointments for the Solid Waste Committee were
deferred from the Board meeting on February 26, 1992. The Board
needs to nominate/ appoint two persons from Midlothian District
and one person from Clover Hill District with terms. expiring
December 31, 1992.
PREPARED B~
ATTACHMENTS: YES C
NO II
SIGNAT URE :
~
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
00
.,'
~ ~:h 4 ~
'7J 8 ~ ) ~ I d ~
r.a
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVl SORS
AGENDA
~
MEETING DATE:
March 11, 1992
ITEM NUMBER;
7.B.l. & 2.
SUBJECT;
Request of Veterinarians to Discuss Assessment of
Business License Taxes
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
This matter was deferred from the February 12, 1992
meeting of the Board .of Supervisors ~
A group of thirteen veterinarians and an accountant have
asked to speak to the Board concerning their business license
tax assessments and a recent audit of veterinarian businesses
conducted by. the Commissioner of Revenue. A copy of the
group's letter request is attached.
Ti tIe 58 .1, Chapter 35 of the Code of Virqinia 1 1950, as
amended, authorizes localities to adopt 'business license tax
ordinances. The County first adopted a business license tax
ordinance in 1962. Under State law the Board of Supervisors
is authorized to establish by ordinance which business
classifications will be taxed and at what tax rate. Most
businesses in the County are taxed under one or more of the
following classifications: (1) wholesale or retail merchants,
( 2 ) personal se rvi ce , ( 3 ) prof e s s ional servi ce and ( 4 )
contractors. However, once the business license tax
classifications and tax rates are set by ordinance I the
(conti~ED BY:
Lane B . Ramsey
County Administrator
ATTACHMENTS: YES C
NO II
0400:273.1
SIGNATURE:
~
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
00 179
808-9891
l .
.' . ...-oJ
e
e
fA
AGENDA ITEM
March 11, 1992
Page 2
Cormnissioner of Revenue is solely responsible for making the
business license tax assessment on each individual business.
The Board has no legal authority to become involved in the
assessment process.
In the latter part of 1991, the Commissioner of Revenue
conducted an audit of veterinarian businesses and concluded
that previous license tax assessments of these businesses were
incorrect~ Pursuant to County ordinance, the Commissioner
subsequently corrected these assessments and corrected tax bills
were issued. The group of veterinarians asking to address 'the
Board disagrees with the Commissioner's corrected assessments
and recently - on January 14, 1992 - the Commissioner and the
veterinarians met to discuss the veterinarians' concerns. If
the veterinarians continue to disagree wi th their assessments 1
they may contest the assessments in the Chesterfield County
Circuit court under a procedure established by State law.
As a ma t t er 0 f law, the Board cannot change the
assessment decisions made by the Commissioner of Revenue. The
Board could, however, amend the business license tax ordinance
to (1) eliminate the license tax classification under which
veterinarians are taxes (professional service) or (2) reduce
the current tax rate of $.58 per $100 of gross receipts for
the professional service category. Either of these changes
would affect all professional service providers in the County
(i.e., doctors, lawyers, accountants).
0400:237.1
00 180
~,
~ ~.' ~. I,.t/
~I~
e
, . ( . ~
.~"
e.
~'
,t
~~:jr. IJan e i.{ rlms e ~r .
~o untv i\cl minis t ;:a tor
1) G [.~x l~O -
CI18s"tC?rfield. .....;1. 23832
1-15-92
Sir,
t-~J e \vould 1 ik e to be add ed to the a:'..enda to spea}~ l~efo re
the 11oa_rd oJ~ S u!){?r,T isors at the January 22 meetin[~.
rrhe tonic of discu::;sion v/i11 he the c.ludi t per~formed
()rl the ~Jet~rinari.at1S of Chesterfield County l)y the office
of t11e Com-.l1 iss i oner' o.C Revenlle t
We hope that the Board of Supervisors will be able to
elar i fy thc~ Code. J)e]~tainin 'f to the collec t ion of revenues
when appl~)'ln;'. for ~l business license.
Cary L II Za v il~ Eon J.\. ir Animal. Hospi tal
Charles Hickey Pocoshock Animal Hospital_
Mitch Tedeschi Cloverhill Animal Hospital
~'J ill iam Dunnavant Ironbr id r e Animal Hos pi tal
Owe n .'ie L"ad den ;'~'1 id loth ian i\ n i Inal lio s pita 1
John 'rerrell ~)ycarnore i\nimal Hos!Ji tal
Hicha~~d l',:it"terman Oxl)ridre t~nimal llospital
(,lenn Uec]cer't Laldwin Creek J\.nimal l-lospi tal
Dav id -".,~oor e li u? enot H oad r\nimal llospi tal
1\1ichael J\nthOt1Y Stonellen.~,':e Animal Ilospi tell/Swift
Cartei.' Durl~.ey J'.ermuda r[undred l\nimal Hospital
N ic]( '~laln Elam llnimal Hospital
j{ichard Jo'rdan Town and Country Animal tlospi tal
:\alph /~merllick Halph l\merniclc &Co.
The above is a list of speat~ers wishillr to address
this subject. - If there arc any questions please ca
at 276-5554, my office.
ere e I'\:
C..,"
( ()O "(
lJ ->,-.f,.,.r.~ '~
Dr. Cary Zl~iQ
,me
/
"./"
00 181
1l C,
:.. ~,."..
.
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
,.~
..'4:.
SUBJECT:
MEETING DATE: March 11,1992 ITEM NUMBER: 7.C.
Deferred from February 12, '1992, a Public hearing
to consider the conveyance, of leases of real
property in the Chesterfield Parks system for
operation of food concessions by athletic associations.
COUNTY ADMINISTRATORt S COMMENTS:
tJ.e. ~ ~ P.tR ~~~ .6 ~
zt" ~ ~C7t 3 ~... / ...~
-:tlcJ ~ ~ ACJ-4/l.A ~
~ J.>e. ~~ A4<d ~ ..u....
SUMM{RY OF INFORMATION:
The Board of Supervisors ("the Board") is requested to approve the
conveyance of leases of real property in the Chesterfield park
facilities' system for operation of food concessions at the sites
where lease holders are willing to abide by the provision of the
lease and sign the document.
~
c/
~.
BACKGROUND
In the past the Parks and.Recreation facilities have been operated by
athletic associations. The Parks and Recreation Department ("the
department") h.as found most of the association's services to be
satisfactory and in compliance with most provisions of the lease
agreement which expired December 31, 1991. (See- page 2 for
additional background information)
RECOMM:ENDATION
The Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors approve those
requests on concessions where lease holders are willing to sign
the leases.
Staff further recommends that any individual or .association
unwilling to sign the lease at this time be provided the
opportunity to resolve the concerns individually and sign the
lease. PREPARED BY: ~~-</!~
ATTACHMENTS: YES K
NO 0
SIGNATURE:
~
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
00 182
805-9891
-'"I
e
e
'..
Additional Background
Information
February 12, 1992
BACKGROUND
This publi~c hearing was deferred from the Board. of ~upervisors
meeting of February 12, 1992. At that meeting representatives
from one association expressed concerns related to notification of
the public hearing and content of the revised lease.
Since that time, staff met with those persons and showed that
public hearing notices were advertised, an announcement of the
hearing was made at a meeting of sports associations and a copy of
the. existing lease was included in a manual provided to all
associations. The meeting resolved the allegations brought up at
the February 12, 1992 meeting and brought about a consensus with
the majority of leas~ holders.
Staff has mailed a copy of the revised lease to each association,
notif'ied them in writing of the rescheduled public hearing and '
wi 11 f allow wi th calls to reso 1 ve any pending issues. Another
letter was sent to association officials with a lease to be signed
and returned for execution by appropriate County officials.
The lease is the same for all concerned parties. This provision
for uniformity of requirements on the part of. groups is the only
equitable way to operate similar properties. Uniformity in
leases, wi thout special arrangements for some associations or
individuals, is' the key to maintaining the level of control
necessary for access, maintenance, safety and other factors
necesary for the County to keep a handle on -this process.
The department wishes to enter into a long term lease agreement
with athletic associations shown on the attachment for the
operation of food concessions. A public hearing and approval of
the Board is necessary to execute the lease agreements.
There are currently 11. food concession stands located at youth
sports complexes throughout the County. These concession stands
have traditionally been operated by volunteer youth sports
organi z a tions who play' on the adj acent f aci Ii ties. These
organizations help to fund their purchase of uniforms, bats and
balls, football equipment, etc., through revenues collected from
concession sales.
The first concession stand operated in the County parks system was
opened in the mid 1970's at Rockwood Park. It was operated by the
Chesterfield Baseball Clubs, Inc. In 1980-81, the first formal
lease agreement for use of the property was approved by the Board
00 183
e
e
",
Additional Background
Information
February 12, 1992
of Supervisors. During the next 10 years, another 11 concession
buildings were constructed. Four of these buildings were
constructed with donations from youth sports organizations
themselves utilizing revenue from concession sales. Eleven' of
these doncession buildings have been operated by youth sports
organizations. The 12th building, which is located at the Iron
Bridge ~adult .softball complex, is operated by the Parks and
Recreation Department.
Each athletic association enters into a standard concession lease
agreement with the County. At one time the agreement was for a
three year period. The County has shortened this period over the
years and staff is currently recommending a one year lease which
will allow the staff to better enforce the terms of the agreement.
The lease calls for a sum of 10% of the,gross receipts. from all
concession sales to be paid. on an annual basis.. Athle.tic group
must agree to:
pay rent on a specified schequle
keep and maintain separate books and records on the
concession operation
submit all books and records to the Parks and Recreation
Department when requested to do so
submit payment and annual financial. report on receipts and
disbursements
install necessary equipment and keep facility staffed during
bu~iness hours
keep and maintain the concession clean and in a good state of
repair
ke~p current health and sanitation permits
ke~p adequate fire, hazard and liability insurance
.hold the County/department harmless of and from all claims,
suits, damages, costs and expenses arising out of or in any
way relating to the group's operation of the facility.
conserve energy by shutting down all major equipment during
the off-season
The department needs access to these buildings for safety,
security, and maintenance. Some groups object to this access, but
this provision must be retained.
The Parks and Recreation Department provides electricity, water
and sewer facilities and regular trash collection.
00 184
e
e
RECOMMENDATION
j
Although there have, on occasion, been some problems with
non-pa~ent of rent, lack of adequate organization records, and
limited I County access to concession buildings, staff believes that
organizational operation of concession is the best and most
economical way to provide needed food service at County
recreatioinal sites.
In addition, concession sales are a major- fund raiser for the
youth sports organizations and these funds are an important part
of the County's overall recreation resources. Accordingly, staff
recommends that the Board of Supervisors approve this request.
Attached to this item is a listing of all concession building
sites and the current operators of those sites. Also attached is
a form lease'agreernent.
00 185
.
e
PUBLIC IIEARING FOR OPERA'rION OF FOOD CONCESSIONS
J:!nuary 8, 1992
Real Property (Facilities)
Bensley Conunun i ty Bu ildillg
Chalkley Athletic Complex
Rockwood Park
Bird Athletic Complex
Point of Rocks
Ettrick Park
llarrowga te Pa~k
Robious Athletic Complex
Ma-toaca Park _
Iron Bridge Park
Goyne Park
Current Lease llolder
Densley Athletic Association
Cl1al kley Atllletic Ansae ia tion
CItes terf ield Baseball Clubs, Inc.
Cl1esterf ield Girls Sof tba11
Enon Athletic Association
Ettrick Youth Sports Association
Ilarrowga te AthIe tic 1\sBocia tion
Iluguenot Little League
Matoaca Athletic Association
Chesterfield Baseball Clubs, Inc.
Chester Sports Boosters
00 186
.
.
LEASE AGREEMEN'f
TillS AGREEMENT, made tIlls
day of
, 199
by and
between tile COUNTY OF CIIESTERFIELD. VIRGINIA ("IJessor") and
("Lessee") .
WHEREAS t Lessor owns and operates 8 recreational park in
Chesterfield County. Virgillia, known 89
I located
in
District, in which tJlere 1189 been constructed a
concession facility. and
WIIEREAS, Lessee desires to operate tile cotlcessioll facility to offer
food, beverages ond otl1cr products to the general public using Buell
facility.
WIT N E SSE T II :
That for and in consideration of the mutual coveilants herein con-
tained. Lessor Ilereby grants and the Lessee Ilereby accepts a nonexclu-
slve
lesse
to
operate
{lIe
concession
facility
loco te d
at
upon tIle following terms and conditions:
1. TIle lease Ilerein grantee) 811011 be effective for 8 period of
one year t commencing on January 1 t 199 _ and ending December 31,
199 unless ternltllated sOotIer by Lessor due to any default by tIle
Lessee whicll is not cured wltllln tl1lrty days after Lessee receives written
notice of such default.
2. Lessee el1811 pay to Lessor 8 sum equal to ten percent (10%)
of the gross receipts from all concession Bales. includlrig credit Bales. and
said payment shall be made payable to the Treasurer of the County of
00 187
.
.
Chesterfield and delivered to the Director of Parks and Recreation, County
of CJlesterfleld, Virginia, ( "DIrector"), on December 31 of' tIle current
year; provided. however. that Lessor. upon giving Lessee thirty (30)
days written notice t may increase the percentage of gross receipts payable
to Lessor to the level Lessor deenlB necessary to cover Lessor's actual
costs relating to .the operation and maintenance of the concession facility.
3. By acceptance of this Lease, Lessee covenants witll Lessor
the following:
8. To pay rent promptly 88 establtslled llereln.
b. To lteep and nlalntaln separate, adequate books and
records pursuant to the operation of the concession facility. Said books
and records sholl be submitted to tIle Director OIOllg witll tIle December 31
payment In eacll current year.
c. To submit, at reasonable times wIlen requested by tIle
Parks and Recreation Departmen t of tIle County of Chesterfield t (" Depart-
mentll), all books and records pursuant to the operation of the concession
facility.
d. To submit to the Director along witll tlte December 31
payment in each current year. an annual financial report of all receipts
and disbursements pursuant to operation of tIle concession facility.
e. To Instoll, at the Lessee's expense. all necessary
equipment. approved by Lessor t for operation of the concession facUity
and to keep Borne adequately staffed during bUBlllesB hours.
0903:6057:57
- 2 -
00 188
e
.
f. To keep and maintain the concession facility and
appurtenances tllereto neat t clean. and In a good state of repair; normal
wear and tear excepted.
g. To secure and keep current all necessary Ilealtll snd
sanitation permits reqlJlred by law, and any slId all otller licenses or per-
mits 8S may be Ilecessory or required by low Cor tile operatIon of tIle
concession facilIty.
h. To secure arId keep In force adequate fire and 118zard
insurance upon tile contents. and public liability Insurance naming the
County 88 co-Insured In an 81nounl not less tllon $500,000, and to provide
the Director with 8 Certificate of Insurance whlcll Indicates tl18t the Coun-
ty Is so named and so Insured.
I. To Indemnify and 110ld Lessor 11arlnless from any and
all claims, sults, domages. costs and expenses arising out of or In any
way relating to Lessee's conduct and operation of tIle concession facility,
and from any damages. claims or 8ults based on personal Injury or proper-
ty damage caused by Lessee's Ilegligence.
j. To keep tile orea in and arotJnd the Ilnlnedlate vicinity
of the concessIon building free of litter and debris.
k. To file for tile Director's approval, n sclledule of
Items to be sold for Iluman consumption and tile prices to be cJlsrged,
prior to the commencemellt of operation. Upon approval t neither tIle Items
to be 8ol~ nor the prIces Sl1811 be altered, amended or modified wltllout
prior approval of the Director.
0903:6057:51
- 3 -
00 189
.
.
1. To Immediatel)' report any theft of merchandise, per-
sonal property II c8sll, checks or credit slips to the police and tIle Direc-
tor.
m. To assist in tIle conservation of energy by sllutting
down all major equipment during the orf season.
4 . Lessor and J...essee nlutually covensllt and agree thot:
8. Lessee ]18S inspected tIle concession facility and agrees
to accept saIne in Its cOJlditlon 8B of tIle date of tIlts contract. Lessee
s]1011 not make any alterations or additions to tllC leased premises witll0Ut
the prior written consent of '.lessor. All alterations t cllangeB and irnprove-
menta built, constructed or placed on the leased premises by Lessee. witll
tIle exception of fixtures removable wltllout damage to tIle premises and
movable personal property shall t unless otherwise provided by written
agreement between Lessor and Lessee, become tIle property of the Lessor
and remain on tIle demised premises at tIle expiration or sooner terrnlnation
of the Lease. Ilessee agrees tflat tIle cost of arlY replacelnent keys and
changing of locks after Lessor's Initial provision of Borne will be borne by
Lessee.
b. Lessor sllall not be liable for damage to any property
or injury to any person In, 011 or about tIle concession facility from any
cause whatsoever.
c. Lessor shall have access to concession facility at all
times t and 811811 have first priority for use of said facility ill the event of
0903:6057:57
- 4 -
00 19'0
.
.
8 schedtllfng confUct between l,essee and Lessor. Lessor 811811 give Lessee
at lenst 30 days' notice of Lessor's Intent to use said facility:
d. Lessor shall provide, wltllout additional cost to Lessee,
electricity t water ond sewer facilities. and regular trash collection.
e. Lessee al1811 not 8sslgn tIlts Lease nor sublease the
Leased Premises witllout the prior written consent of Lessor t wllleJl will not
be utlreasonably wIthheld. Any attempted Bublease or assignment without
the consent of tIle J..eSBor sholl .be void 811d of no force or effect.
f. All Items of indebtedness or d81noge under tllese cove-
nants 8]1811 be considered 88 itelDs of rent and Lessor s]lsll Ilave the same
Dens and the same remedies for tIle collection tllereof 88 are provided
hereitl and by law for tile collection of rent.
g. Upon tIle breacll of any covensllt contatl1ed herein or
the abandollmen t or vacation of tile p remises by the I..essee. or tile failure
to provide tile required Certificate of Insurance, books. records, financial
reports or payments, tIle Lessor nl0Y. at ItB option. Ilnmedintely terndnate
tIlls Lease, and shall have tile rlgllt to enter tile premises at Ollce and
take possession tllereof. including improvements erected tllereon. Suetl
termination or possession, 11owever. stloI! not deprive the Lessor of any
atller nction or rcnledy for possession, relIt or damages.
11. In tIle everlt tIle denllsed prenllses are condelnned J in
wllole or In part-, or otllerwtse acquired by 8 public autllorlty. this Lease,
at the option of tile Lessee, may tllereupon be terminated and tIle Lessor
S11011 not be lIable for any inconvenletlce or damage to tIle Lessee caused
0903:6057:57
- 5 -
00 191
.
.
thereby. The J.lessor reserves tIle right to condemtl 8S provided by law
and Buch action by tIle Lessor s11al1 constitute a means for. terminatiorl of
this Lease without penalty.
5. Lessor and Lessee agree that tIlls Agreement constitutes tile
entire agreement, understanding and representation, express or implied t
between the parties. This Agreement supersedes all prior written or oral
agreements or proposals between the parties.
6 . This Agreemerlt shall be governed by tIle terms llerein. Any
dispute concerning this Agreement shall be resolved In tIle Circuit Court
of tile County of Chesterfield. This Agreement is deemed to have been
made in Virginia and el1811 be construed under the laws of Virgillia"
7 . This contract Is expressly contingent upon tIle approval of a
resolution duly adopted by tIle Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield Coun-
ty, which approves this COlltract and 8utllortzes its execution by tile
County Administrator.
WITNESS the following slgllstures and seals:
LESSOR:
COtJNTY OF CIIESTERFIELD t VIRGINIA
By:
IJOlle B. Rnlllsey
County Adnllnlstrator
0903: 6057: 57 .
- 6 -
00 192
. .
.
~
Approved 88 to form:
Barbara E. King
Assistant COUllty Attorney
ATTEST:
0903:6057:57
By:
Ti tIe:
LESSEB:
.
- 7 -
00 193
. I'~
/'
r~
~'
e
g,lJ.
e
CHESTERFI ELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVI SORS
AGENDA
REPORTS
MEETING DATE: March 11, 1992
B.A.
REPORT ON:
. ATTACHMENTS:
status of Gene~al Fund Balance, Reserve for Futur~
Capital Projects, District Road and street Light
Funds, Lease Purchases, and School Board Agenda
YES g~". - NO [J
SIGNATURE:
~
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
00
f '"
.
e
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
GENERAL FUND BALANCE
March 3, 1992
Board
Meeting
Date Description Amount Balance
07/01/91 FY92 Beginning Fund
Balance $15,426,215
08/28/91 Loan to Midlothian Vol-
unteer Fire Dept. for
building addition ( 45,000) 15,381,215
10/23/91 Appropriated funds for
temporary position in
Planning Dept. for
Riverfront Plan research
contingent upon $150,000
to $250,000 match from
private sector 50,000) 15,331,215
gfbal
00 195
~ .. .... ..
Board
Meeting
Date
11/22/89
12/13/89
06/30/90
06/13/90
06/27/90
06/27/90
12/12/90
06/30/91
03/13/91
07/01/91
.
e
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
RESERVE FOR FUTURE CAPITAL PROJECTS
TRADITIONALLY FUNDED BY DEBT
March 3, 1992
Description
Amount
FY89 Excess revenue
$2,119,900
FY90 Budgeted addition
1,881,500
Designation from June 30,
1989 Fund Balance
1,500,000
Purchase of land-Cogbill Road 630,000)
Purchase building at 6701
West Krause Road 400,000)
Budgeted addition of excess
revenue 2,100,000
Purchase medical building for
future library site 735,000)
Funds to purchase land for
park on Lake Chesdin 600,000)
Budgeted but not appropriated
funds to purchase land for
school and park sites (2,000,000)
Fill dirt for cover repair
at Fort Darling Landfill 180,000)
Budgeted addition from FY91
revenues 4,000,000
Designated _but not .appropriated
funds to cover construction
contract for MH/MR/SA building
if bondsJ are not sold in
fall, 1991 (1,806,800)
Regional Jail Authority as
approved in the FY92 Adopted
Budget (which will be reim-
bursed) (1,000,000)
Page 1 of 2
Balance
$2,119,900
4,001,400
5,501,400
4,871,400
4,471,400
6,571,400
5,836,400
5,236,400
3,236,400
3,056,400
7,056,400
5,249,600
4,249,600
00 196
....
08/28/91
08/28/91
08/28/91
11/27/91
rfcip
.
e
Provide funding for improve-
ments at Northern Area Landfill
to allow reallocation of
General Fund dollars to
recycling programs 315,000)
Additional funding for
Bon Air Library expansion 275,500)
Add back MH/MR building
funds which were previously
deducted for construction 1,806,800
Appropriated funds for T.V.
arraignment equipment but
holding in reserve account
until prices and all costs
are confirmed 115,000)
Page 2 of 2
3,934,600
3,659,100
5,465,900
5,350,900
00 19ft
~. . e
-. Q) qot '-D (Y) <X) N 0
00 0 \.0 M 0'\ M r-I 0
~ l""""'I 0'\ \..0 N r-.... U1
+J ct:S "'"
r-I r-- CO en M M ('Ii
,.c: rt1 rl M rl
r::Q
0\
.rl \D ~ r I" N 00 a
Ul M \.0 0 \.0 00
H rou M t.11 00 N ['-.
~ Q) ....
::j Ul \.0 qt M N M
~::>
+J
(]J c:
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ul Q) ...-1 0 0 0 0 0 0
Q +J U1 tn to If) If) Lf')
Z ~ Nrd
::J 0'\ - rt M f""") M M M ("I')
[L, +J >--~ r-I M M rl M r--I
C:t.I~
E-t Ul 0
::r:: ~
C!) p..
H p..
...:IN .c(
rn
8m
ClJrl
PtJ
~ ... ClJ ('f) co N rn 0 r=:(
8M U M qt ..........
(/] s:: 0 \.0 Z
,.c: rn ro
QO ,...-t \.0 M
~~ ro ctS N
00
:::: c::
Q
r=:x: ;j 0 0 0 0 N rc(
0 tfl Ln a U1 0 N ............
~ rx.. 'Ore rl f""""i \.0 1""""1 N Z
J:: (])
8 ::I U) rl lO rl Lf) 0"\
(J ~:::> N qt r-t L.t1 M.
H rtj
~
E-t rd c:
en 0 a 0 0 0 0
H 0 "r-i 0 0 0 0 0
Q +J \.C \.D \..0 \.0 '-.0
~ rtS
t\1 . r-I m L.() LO to Ln
m~ M 1""""1 r-I r-t rl <
+J ~A ............
~ 0 Z
s:: ~
~
Q) ~
~
()
~
M 00 N C"\ N
U} ~ LO M 0"\ 0 N
Q) H Q) LO Ln \0 U1 \..D
ru :>
Q) IDO L.{) \.D 0". en M .:(
:>-1 M M M N ............
~ :>1 Z
~J-t
,.c: o ~
· r-I ctj
E-t ~u
P-i
r-i (])
r--t a:: ~
-rl m ~r-f
+J ::r: -..-I ~
0 ftJ C(j ,.c:
.r-i roo ~ 0 +J :>t
~ ;j Q) cd 0 -+J
+J E :> Q) 0 rl ~
Ul ~ 0 .......4 +J '0 ~
.,.-f Q) ..-i rd cO ..r-i 0
0 OJ U 0 ~ :E: U
00 198
:- - ~.
.
e
"':"tt
Prepared by
Accounting Department
February 29, 1992
SCHEDULE OF CAPITALIZED LEASE PURCHASES
Date
Lease
Purchase
Began
Descriution
Original
Lease
Purchase
Amount
Date
Lease
Purchase
Ends
Outstanding
Balance
2/29/92
APPROVED AND EXECUTED
12/83 Copiers $ 30,500 8/92 $ 4,067
7/87 School Vehicles 259,500 6/92 10,242
7/87 School Telecommunications
Equipment 239,046 7/92 23,709
10/87 Jail Addition 245,385 12/01 191,'836
Data Processing 1,839,219 1,437,848
Hwnan Services 4,489,377 3,509,668
Courts Building 16~796~O19 13~130.648
23,370,000 18,270,000
6/88 800 MHz Equip. -
Rescue Squads 85,000 6/93 28,408 /
800 MHz Equip.. - I'
Sheriff 140,000 46,572
Fire Pumpers 264,000 88,015
Fire Station Apparatus
and Furnishings 1,428,000 248,640
A T & T Phone Equip. 946,400 305,486
Filing System-
Treasurer 401000 9,014
(Unallocated) 83~600 0
2,987,000 726,135
c
~ ~ ".
I'J!
00 199
~
.
e
<;.Jlt
Date Original Date
Lease Lease Lease Outstanding
Purchase Purchase Purchase Balance
Began Descriptions Amount Ends 2/29/92
10/88 School Copier $ 21,600 9/93 $ , 8, 781
12/88 Airport State Police
Hangar Additions 128,800 106,349
and County Warehouse 331~200 12/00 273~470
460,000 379,819
3/89 Geographic Information
System (IIGIS") -
Automated Mapping
System 3,095,000 1/98 2,650,000
8/89 Data Processing Equipment 183,430 8/92 22,520
12/89 Data Processing Equipment 21015,570 1/95 991,827
10/90 Mental Health, Mental
Retardation and
Substance Abuse
Computer Equipment 96~500 7/93 50.161
TOTAL APPROVED
AND EXECUTED $32,758,146 $23,137,261
PENDING APPROVAL AND JOR KXEGOTION
None
c:caplease.doc
00 -200
.
e
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOL
CHESTERFIELD, VIRGINIA
March 10, 1992
School Administration Building
The Public Meeting Room
9901 lor; Road
Chesterfield, Virginia 23832
5:00 p~m~
7:30 p"m~
SCHOOL BOARD MEMBERS
Jean P. Copeland-Chairman, Matoaca
Timothy Carter Brown-Vice-Chairman, Midlothian
. John A. Cardea, M.D., Clover Hill
. Elizabeth B. Davis, Dale
Marshall W. Trammell, Jr., Bermuda
. Thomas R. Fulghum, Superintendent
AGENDA
EXECUTIVE SESSION OF THE SCHOOL BOARD
5:00 P.M.
SCHOOL ADMINISTRATION BUILDING
7:30 P.M.
REGULAR SCHOOL BOARD HEETING
THE PUBLIC HEETING ROOM
A. Call to Order, Roll Call, Flag Salute - Mrs. Copeland, presiding
B. Acceptance of Minutes
February 25, 1992 (Regular Meeting)
c. Agenda Approval
D. Awards and Recognitions
#86 Recognition of Eskimo Pie Corporation Program with Bailey Bridge
Middle School
E. Superintendent's Report
#77 Student Housing Update for 1992-93 School Year
#87 Review of Midyear Budget Review Management Actions
F. Action Items
cloo ./
-.
e
1. Consent Agenda
Human Resource
#82 Recommended Personnel Action for 199]-92
Ooerations and Finance
#83 Request Approval of Petty Cash Reimbursement for February,
1992, Disbursements
#85 Waiver Requesting 1992-93 School Opening Before labor Day
G. Non~Agenda Items
H. Discussion Agenda. (No public testimony will be accepted on discussion
agenda items.)
#84 Meals Tax/CIP Reserve Fund
#88 Discont,inuance of National School lunch Program in Chesterfield
County High Schools
I. Announcements, Communications, School Board Comments
J. Executive Session (personnel, legal, land/property acquisition,
discipline)
K. Adjournment-
General I nformat; on
The Chesterfield School Board meets on the second and fourth Tuesday of
each month with the exception of July when it meets on the second Tuesday,
August when it meets on the Fourth Tuesday, November when it meets on the
second Tuesday, and December when it meets on the second Tuesday, The first
meeting of each month begins at 5:00 p.m.; the second meeting of the month
.starts at 7:30 p.m. All meetings are open to the public and are held in the
Public Meeting Room; 9901 Lori Road, Chesterfield, Virginia. If the place or
time ;s changed, the public will be notified.
Following is the procedure by which the public may speak before the
school Board at any of the above meetings:
1. Persons wishing to be heard on attion items must notify the
Superintendent's office by 2:00 p.m. on the day of the meeting.
2. Persons who have requested to offer public testimony will be heard
when each item is considered.
3. Persons to be heard on non-agenda items will be heard during the
specified section of the meeting.
2
,)00 .a
.
e
4. It;s requested that an individual conduct his/her presentation in
three minutes; representatives of a group may speak for five
minutes.
5. Public delegations. Public delegations or their representatives
are required to submit in writing their request for hearing and
their proposals to the Superintendent at least five days prior to
the meeting at which they wish to be heard.
3
~~.~
, 'j
, \
, ('" .. \ ,
fa
:_e.
8 t 6.
e
CHESTERFI ELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
REPORTS
MEETING DATE: March 11, 1992
.
a.B.
REPORT ON: Roads Accepted into the state Secondary System
. ATTACHMENTS: YES iii 'NO l1
SIGNAT URE :
COU~INISTRATOR
';"" A .,
: 'Of
. ..
.
.'
COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINIA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
1401 EAST B R DAD STREET
RICHMOND. 23219
RAY D. PETHTEL
COMM I$SIONER
February 18, 1992
Secondary System
Addition
Chesterfield County
Board of Supervisors
County of Chesterfield
P. O. Box 40
Chesterfield, VA 23832
MEMBERS OF THE BOARD:
As requested in your resolution dated December 11, 1991, the following
addition to the Secondary System of Ch~sterfield County is hereby approved,
effective February 11, 1992~
ADDITION
CREEKWOOD - SECTION J
Route 3170 (Litchfield Drive) ~ From 0.03 mile South Route 4695
to 0.17 mile Southeast Route 4695
Sincerely,
~ iLlidId
~y D. Pethtel
Commissioner
TRANSPORTATION FOR THE 21ST CENTURY
LENGTH
0.14 Mi
,00 202
.~-..;~~-_.. ,:.;
,.....
~.
-,
~.e\
e
CHESTERFI ELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
REPORTS '
MEETING DATE:
March 11, 1992
S.c.
REPORT ON: Report of Water and Sewer Contracts by Developers
BACKGROUND:
The Board of Supervisors has authorized the County Administrator to
execute water and/or sewer contracts between the County and the
Developer in which no County funds are involved.
The report is submitted to the Board members so they will be aware
of development utilizing public water and/or sewer within their
districts.
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
The following water and sewer contracts were executed by the County
Administrator:
1 .
Contract Number':
Project Name:
Developer:
Contractor:
Contract Amount:
District:
2.
Contract Number-:
proj ect tJarne:
Developer:
Contractor:
Contract Amount:
District:
ATTACHMENTS: YES 0
90-0472
Mayfair Estates, Section G
~1r. Irvin G. Horner
Piedmont Construction Co., Inc.
Water - $31,967.50
Sewer - $34,504.95
Clover Hill
89-0154
Martin Office Complex
Mr. Charles Martin
Brians Water Tap Service
Water - $23,000.00
Sewer - $ 2,768.72
~1idlothian
I
~K
PREPARED BY: I
U E. Beck, Jr.
Assistant Director
o~ Utilities
NO .
SIGNATURE:
~
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
00 2.03
.J. .~l.':_~,.... .
~
;" "
~
e
Agenda Item
March 11, 1992
Page 2
3 .
Contract Number:
Project Name:
Developer:
Contractor:
Contract Amount:
District:
4.
Contract Number:
Project Name:
Developer:
Contractor:
Contract Amount:
District:
5 .
Contract Nwnber:
Project Name:
Developer:
Contractor:
Contract Amount:
District:
e
91-0006
Antler Ridge, Section 4 @ Deer Run
William B. & Gene H. DuVal
J. Steven Chafin, Inc.
Water - $21,671.00
Sewer - $40,728.00
Matoaca
89-0709
Ascot Forest Subdivision
Rowe Associates, Ltd.
J. Steven Chafin, Inc.
Water - $34,096.00
Sewer - $43,232.00
Bermuda
91-0123
Whitten Brothers Jeep/Eagle at
Johnston willis Drive
Whitlow Properties, Inc.
Brians Water Tap Service
Water - $7,494.00
Private Sewer - $1,000.00
Clover Hill
00 204
.f
.;.
"
,.;
/"
/d~ 11.
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
MEETING DATE :March 11, 1992
ITEM NUMBER:
12.A.
SUBJECT:
In'troduction of the 1992 Utilities Department Poster
Contest Winners.
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
The Director of Utilities will introduce the eight (8) winners of
the Utilities Department's annual poster contest.
The theme of this year's Utilities Department annual poster contest
is "Quality Drinking Water: Don't Take It For Granted." This is a
major educational and pUblic relations event sponsored by the
Department of Utilities each year. Not only does it bring
recognition to the department, it helps students and their
parents realize what is involved in producing clean water.
The contest was open to all sixth, seventh and eighth grade
students in the Chesterfield County School system. Each of the
ten county middle schools was allowed to submit ten posters to the
Utilities Department for final judging. Altogether 1,151 posters
were submitted to the schools for preliminary judging.
ATTACHMENTS: YES!(
PREPARED BY; ~ ~ ~
John M. Bragg
Assistant Director of Utilities
NO 0
SIGNATURE:
..~
COUN-tV ADMINISTRATOR
00 205
805-9891
.-
~ ~
/
e
e
The Director of utilities will introduce this year's winners which
are listed below:
1st Place:
($150 Savings
Bond)
2nd Place:
($100 Savings
Bond)
3rd Place:
($75 Savings
Bond)
Erin Mitchell, 6th grade; Midlothian Middle School
Teacher: Mike Garbini
Supervisor: Ed Barber
Carolyn Nehls, 6th grade; Midlothian Middle School
Teacher: Joyce Moldovan
Supervisor: Ed Barber
Matthew Sholley, 8th 'grade; Robious Middle School
Teacher: Barbara Kittle
Supervisor: Ed Barber
Honorable Mention:
($50 Savings Bond)
Jenny Jacobs,
Teacher:
Supervisor:
6th grade; Carver Middle School
Carlton. Smith
Whaley M. Colbert
Jaime Cortes, III, 7th grade; Falling Creek Middle
School
Myron Boston
Harry G. Daniel
Teacher:
Supervisor:
Jennie Bajnai, 7th grade; Swift Creek Middle School
Teacher: Janet Pittman
Supervisor: Arthur S. Warren
Joe Rudzik,
Teacher:
Supervisor:
8th grade; Providence Middle School
Delores Richardson
Arthur S. Warren
Sarah Dierse,
Teacher:
Supervisor:
8th grade; Midlothian Middle School
Joan Groves
Edward B. Barber
Best in School:
Bailey Bridge Middle School:
Marvin Julian Boyd, 8th grade
Teacher: Margaret Powers
Supervisor: Whaley M. Colbert
Matoaca Middle School:
Larry Harris, 7th grade
Teacher: Sandra Neace
Supervisor: Whaley M. Colbert
Chester Middle School:
Laura Davis, 7th grade
Teacher: Linda Miller
Supervisor: J. L. McHale, III
-2-
00 206
.
~ /
e
e
~
Also:
Erin Mitchell
Matthew Shelley
Jenny Jacobs
Jaime Cortes
Joe Rudzik
Jenny Bajna
Midlothian Middle School
Robious Middle School
Carver Middle School
Falling Creek Middle School
Providence Middle School
Swift Creek Middle School
A special teacher recognition award will be presented to Joyce
Moldovan, of Midlothian Middle School, whose students submitted the
most posters for preliminary judging# Moldovan's students
submitted 136 entries. Swift Creek Middle School will also be
presented with a recognition award for the school submitting the
most posters for preliminary judging. Students there entered 391
posters in the contest.
Posters were submitted to the Utilities Department by Providence
Middle School, Carver Middle School, Robious Middle School, Falling
Creek Middle School, Chester Middle School, Swift Creek Middle
School, Midlothian Middle School, Bailey Bridge and Matoaca Middle
School.
-3-
00 207
.. \
1 "
\..,.';' A ...
JJ,/;~
l
CHESTERFI ELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
,
Y"'''r1
+ ;'
MEETING DATE: March 11, 1992
ITEM NUMBER:
12.B.
SUBJECT:
Resolution Recognizing James H. Johnston, III
Upon His Retirement
COUNTY ADMINISTRATORI S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
WHEREAS, James H. Johnston, III retired from the Chesterfield
County Police Department on March I, 1992; and
WHEREAS, James H. Johnston, III has provided 29 years of
quality service to the citizens of Chesterfield County; and
WHEREAS, James H. Johnston, III has served the County in the
capacity of Patrolman, Detective, Lieutenant, captain, and
Major; and
WHEREAS, James H. Johnston, III has significantly impacted
the safety of the community by implementing new and innovative
practices during his tenure as Commander of the Personnel and
Training Unit, the Records and Communications Division,
Investigative Division, and as the Bureau Commander for
M~na~ement: and Support Services Bureau; and
I ~ :
ATTACHMENTS: YESi_r;l-,>' NO"
PREPARED BY~~~ ~
Frederick W. Willis, .
Director, Human Resource
Management
SIGNATURE:
~
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
~
~~
e
e
Resolution Recognizing James H. Johnston, III Upon His
Retirement
WHEREAS, James H. Johnston, III has provided the
Chesterfield County Police Department with many years of loyal
and dedicated service; and
WHEREAS, Chesterfield County and the Board of Supervisors
will miss the diligent service of James H. Johnston, III.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that this Board of
Supervisors publicly recognized James H. Johnston, III, and
extends on behalf of its members and the citizens of Chesterfield
County their appreciation for his service to the County.
AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that a copy of this Resolution
be presented to James H. Johnston, III, and that this Resolution
be permanently recorded among the papers of this Board of
Supervisors of Chesterfield County.
00 209
,
;! -. ~
, ..~~~
/cJ I e ~
....J f
..... ~...'
. "'1
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
~
MEETING DATE: ,March ll'~ .1992 ~
ITEM NUMBER:
12.C.
SUBJECT:
Resolution Recognizing captain Edward R. Anderson upon His
Retirement
COUNTY ADMINIS TRATOR' 5 COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
WHEREAS, captain Edward R. Anderson will retire from the Fire
Department, Chesterfield County, on March 1, 1992; and
WHEREAS, captain Anderson has provided twenty-three years of
quality service to the citizens of Chesterfield county; and
WHEREAS, captain Anderson developed a microcomputer-based parts
inventory system for the fire maintenance garage that significantly
improved the record keeping on stock parts and which more effectively
documents maintenance repair costs; and
WHEREAS, captain Anderson streamlined our system of requisitions
and work orders for fire maintenance and fire station logistics making
the system more efficient; and
WHEREAS, captain Anderson collected and analyzed data wi th the
microcomputer program that enabled him to make recommendations for
operations improvements; and
WHEREAS, Chesterfield County and the Board of Superv,isors will miss
Captain Anderson's diligent service.
PREFMED BY: ~~~
Frederick W. Willis, Jr., Di ector
Human Resource Management
ATTACHMENTS: YES 0
NO II
SIGNAT URE :
~
COUNTY ADM I NI STRATOR
00 210
805-9891
.
_4.'.. ....\.
"~
e
e
~
~
,
· " '.~-
Resolution Recognizing captain Edward R. Anderson upon His Retirement
Page 2
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that this Board of supervisors
publicly recognizes captain Edward R. Anderson and extends on behalf
of its members and the citizens of Chesterfield County their
appreciation for his service to the County.
AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that a copy to this Resolution be
presented to captain Anderson and that this Resolution be permanently
recorded among the papers of this Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield
County, virginia.
/
00 ;21.1
lA, D,
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVI SORS
AGE NDA
""....
MEET1NGDATE~ March 11, 1992
ITEM NUMBER:
12.D.
SUBJECT: Resolution recognizing Safeco Insurance Company.
COUNTY ADMINISTRATORt S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
The attached is a resolution recognizing Safeco Insurance Company for their
contribution of $10,000 for the renovation of the railroad caboose into a
classroom where child safety programs will be held.
The caboose is located in Satety Town which is directly adjacent to the School
Board warehouse facility.on Krause Road. .
PREPARED 8Y~
ATTACHMENTS: YES""
NO 0
SIGNATURE:
~
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
00 212
. t
e
e
.~ .
RESOLUTION
of the BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CHESTERFIELD COUNTY, VIRGINIA
RECOGNIZING SAFECO INSURANCE COMPANY' S CONTRIBUTION TO CHILD
SAFETY EDUCATION
WHEREAS, SAFECO Insurance company, had a desire to assist the
Chesterfield County Police Department and the citizens of Chesterfield
County in promoting the safety of their children; and
WHEREAS, Safety Town has historically been a center for child
safety education in Chesterfield County where child oriented traffic
and crime prevention programs have been presented both in a tradition-
al class room setting and outside in the realistic life sized storefront
IISafety Town"; and
WHEREAS, the railroad caboose has heretofore been an ornament
giving realism to the children's safety learning, but has never before
been used to its fullest potential as an innovative and imaginative
setting in which children can be taught to be safer from the threat of
injury while playing, walking, or riding their bicycles or to avoid
the dangers of drugs or of becoming crime victims; and
WHEREAS, SAFECO Insurance Company through its monetary
contribution made it possible for the railroad caboose to be
renovated, complete with safety and crime prevention murals depicting
McGruff and law enforcement officers as the children's protectors and
friends, accessible to all children including the handicapped; and
converted into a fascinating and useful classroom for the children of
Chesterfield County; and
~, without the help of SAFECO Insurance Company, this dream
might never have been realized.
HOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Chesterfield County Board
of Supervisors does hereby extend its thanks to the SAFECO Insurance
Company for making such a kind and generous contribution to the safety
of the county.s children now and in the future. For the children
taught in this fantastic learning environment will be able to teach
their children to have a happier, safer, and more crime-free life.
00 213
t ~~-:-I, .- ....7.
808-9891
.. ,
/J,. /Ct
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVl SORS
AGENDA
MEETING DATE :
March 11, 1992
ITEM NUMBER:
12.E.
SUBJECT;
Resolution Recognizing April 26
"Volunteer Week"
May 2, 1992 as
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
Mr. Tim Holtz, Volunteer Center Associate f.or United Way
Services, has requested the Board adopt a resolution recognizing
the week of April 26 - May 2, 1992 as "Volunteer Week". Mr.
Holtz will be present at the meeting to accept the resolution.
(See attached.)
PREPARED BY~
ATTACHMENTS: YES II
NO 0
SIGNATURE:
~
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
00 214
) ..-"...;;.. ..')
e
e
VOLUNTEER WEEK PR<X:LAMt\TION
~, our nation was fOW1ded u:pon a spiri t of action and
involvenent, and the talents and energies of American
volunteers continue to be one of our greatest resources; and
WHEREAS, to build a society that is fair and just for all, we must work
together in a spiri t of love, respect, and cooperation; and
WHEREAS , America cannot look to goverrnnent alone to solve all of its
societal problems; and
WHEREAS, volunteerism is increasingly recognized as an iInportant
partner in doing the work or t.J.~e nation; aliG.
WHERF.AS, participatory citizenship is needed today more than ever to
canbat growing human. and social problerru3, to renew our relief
that these problems can be solved, and to strengthen our sense
of camumi. ty: and
WHEREAS, anyone can be a vollUlteer and bestOW' rich benefits uI?On
his/her neighbors, offering hope and widened horizons; and
WHEREAS I volunteering offers all citizens the opportunity to overcane
apathy by linking their talents and resources with others' in
order to address the major issues facing our ccmnunities, such
as substance abuse I education, hl.ll1ger, harelessness, and
assisting elderly citizens; and
WHEREAS, rrcre and nnre, volunteers and volunteer efforts are growing in
urnna tched numbers; and
WHEREAS, it is fitting for all citizens to join in this celebration of
our rich volunteer heritage and to give special recognition to
the dedicated volunteers and volunteer programs which
contribute L.~easurably to Camu:Ll1ities ~hrf)ughOllt our
city or county;
NOW, THEREFORE, I, (name/title) do hereby proclaim
April 26 - May 2, 1992
as
VOLUNTEER WEEK
in (locality name), and urge my fellow citizens to observe this week in
the appropriate manner. by seeking out an area in the carmunity in which
they can, by devoting a few hours of their time .each week I give aid and
support to serre deserving individual, group, or cause.
Signed this
day of
no 215
~ ':l' ~~~'e . .~."
_, f.,
e
e
UNITED WAY
S E R V ICE S
February 26, 1992
Theresa Pitts
Chesterfield County
P.O. Box 40
Chesterfield, Virginia 23832
Dear Ms. Pitts,
I have been serving as the Volunteer Center Associate for the Southside
Virginia area with united Way Services for only three weeks nay. In my
short tenure, though, I have wi tn.essed. the great impact and contribution
ma.de by volunteers in the life of the County of Chesterfield.
Certainl y, Chesterfield has much to be proud of with respect to the
selfless carmitment of such a large portion of its citizenry.
In light of the ccmmmi ty invol vernent evident in your county and in
light of the burgeoning service ITOvement nationwide , it is my request
that the County of Chesterfield and its elected officials fonnally
recognize April 26 - May 2, 1992 as VolW1teer Week. In doing so, notice
would be served. that volunteers and volunteerism are essential parts of
any carmunity--especially the camnunity known as Chesterfield!
Thank you for your St1pIX)rt of and attention to this very i.mt:xJrtant week
of celebration and recognition. If you have any questions or concern.s
regarding this matter, please contact me at the address/phone number in
the l:ottan right corner of this page. Also, I would enjoy receiving the
official proclamation in person if possible, just please infonn me of
the date, place, and time. (If, of course, this is not }?Ossible, please
mail it to me.) ,
I appreciate,your time!
7~~-
Tim Hal tz _
Volunteer Center Associate
Enclosure
00 216
Serving Charles City, Chesterfield, Colonial Heights, Dinwiddie, Goochland, Hanover, Henri~o, New Kent, Petersburg, Powhatan, Prince George and Richmond
224 East Broad Street
P.o. Box 12209 · Richmond, Virginia 23241-0209
(804) 771-5820 · FAX' (804) 225-7344
233 South Adams Street
P.O. Box 227 · Petersburg.. Virginia 23804
(804) 861-9330 · FAX# (804) 861-0156
.......'-i ...
". _~ ..., '!!I ~
808-9891
+ /~.
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVl SORS
AGENDA
MEETING DATE: March II, 1992
13.
ITEM NUMBER;
SUBJECT;
HEARINGS OF CITIZENS ON UNSCHEDULED MATTERS OR CLAIMS
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR' 5 COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
Mr. Stan Johnson has re~ested to address the Board
regarding soil conditions within the County. See attached.
PREPARED BY~
ATTACHMENTS: YES B NO [J
SIGNAT URE :
~
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
00 21 ~7
.. ,
~ ...... _ ...~. \"-..J,
e
--
3~5-92-
'\
~l-, .
-_tkf- 8C4rLf-~~
t.'".(
_ -r~~t)~_~_~~~_;a_-6_c~ .'-_ ~_~~
-~-~~_~~~~~1~ -7-~
---~ ----;7.v~ ~:7--~~./~f.._&ty~")-~ - .- - - -- --
---~._~-~~'7-~-.'~~_~~~~_U4-
-.'- - -.--- - -
----td-~---~--~-~-4~~-,.uJ;-~~~a-~-----
,----J(d-~--~-~-.-td~--k:L-~~--(~-~)~
- -- -u-~- -~-_t:U--d)- - .-.. - -1i;_-Lf?LtPt-~-C-/8~-/j,j~--
--~-- .~-- --t4u---'110~6-- /
- --~--{rj~-~-L-~~-U4-o/--U~-f_d:u--4L~ ----
~ ~_ t-7'~~-~~~(JlL_/?e4J_b:7"_.Ay-~-~
-_--~-_fk_-~ ~:,{~-~ - -. -'. ~--~o/-?tU<) '.
~--~--I/,~'7.'da-_-~_6-Jd~~~_~-~-~-j,-~-t: .
,.-- - .--~-k:.t~~~_~-dM-~-_~k~~--~-.~
, c ~
__-ttf-.Ik-,~~'_~~--~~tfe~~-~-~ . ---
--,----~- .~~., r-~-~--~_k-~.-~-~------
_ _ __~__ ~__ _ · _ _kz_~~--~ _~~-/nU:eS!~
____~ _/~_e4__V~_~~-
....... ......_ __ - _"__------.,...... .. -.- .......- .--__ ------._---....-+0- ... ...... - I
.....------ --............-.--- -- -- ... ......-.... .
.- -._-,_7le-_~-~_~_~~_a.~;{~'~-r~~---~---
. -.- - .-~-~.-j&f~,5-~~.9-~~~ ~~~~~----
--. -. -kw-M:-- _~u _~__~-~ ~_~Ud!-_~4-__c::~-::_:~:'_
~ ,- ,
- --~-- ---~- -L--~.--a- -~-*~~-~~ -~----
. -Ik _ -71~tntd. ~~_ __~- --cf -~--~.6kf-~~iJ Q _2).~_
; -
-, _J .... -If .......
e
e
..
_~n_d.;k'LIj_ _ ~----~;o;L~-/-L~-~ L~
~__wid~_."- _~4L t1Yj~~__~_<<-__~4.~
_~ -Io__~~- ~~ ~- ~ frdM-r -e,.t ~
---- _L~vt/k ?i__~_~_~_~ ~ ~i-~-~
-- --~-~-~_~ ---d-~--~---~ ;r_b~ --~ ~ .
.-~~-_. -__ . .__1d4~7k_,A.ld~~~~ ~
__--d~-wL--~H---.--,r-~-.a - _ . "__L~ ~ -~
.--.- ~~-~-_!tJ~_. -.Plr-- - __ _$_~~_d~_~
__ ___-Id{j.4(~~tb_~_ -a4-_~-~H_Jj _itu.-_-_j~--~ ~ -----
- - .~ _~_~--Au~- --~--do/JoSr<:L-b7--o/F~-d------
..-- -~.--~f1;-~th-_-_~--~-- _.-r-~- ---
:~~~~-:4- ~--;;::;e~~~~---~--~~~nd7:!:1 Z7
.n.-_bd--.-~---"~--/v--~'-~- -- --- - ---.
- -_-~-_~__~):tK~~.~ ---~ . - H
-----~L _~_?td. _~-~h-~-.. _ _. - .. -~
-- --~---d--~-~:I"-&--t'~-/-~ - - -~:I-
___~-~--~--~--~-~~}ji-~~
___.~~~_~L~-
----~~~ ---~~_._-- -- , ---~--
__ _. 7geOPOSEb. Sot_U]J tJ/L - _. __ _ _ . _ ~__
----
, -
----...-~ ~ --. - __.... ~ ---...- ....- .... - _".I' ~...............__ ___. _ -.......... _ _.... __....... __ ... _...... _ ... __ -..... ...... _ ...... -. _ ......_ _ _.__._-- ____
-- .
---~--~-~-~--~ift ----
--- - --/h.- ~__d__S5IL_Ub~__:e~~~~~~~-----
----- -- ~ -- ~S8fl ~L~'~5' - --~ - -~_:iJ-&h~'1_~-;r --
_u~-_-_~_~&___at/7~__~_ u~__5Incl_~ -h, _~___
H - u-l4e- ~ ~~p ~~. - ~__~_~_~hYJ~ ~Jl'--
-----_ -~-- ~_- ~ ~ ptrlJd ~/~?Ji_~~~--
f
_.~. ..""l"
e.
e
~~~I.s~._~_tv:!l4_~-~t-~J-~ ~~. -.- ~
--.~t-~~-~~~~-~~-~-~~~ .
-~----ffL~c~~~-~4-~-(r~c~ ~
--~- ~~--~~~--d- _1ke;,_~_.f'{IL~_~'; ~ ~ ..
~/J;wai7-~_.-~~"&~t?:e-_-~-p--~-~-~-.a~ ~ ~;---
- -....... -------" ---- ------ ...---- -----........-...... -- . - ----- -.......... --- .........-- -....- ---- ----
___._.~_S~_ ~:S-/a:I,-~_M- _~_?:W-~Jt9W_-~
___. -----~.J-- _.-6__ _U4~ __~p~-~--c~d IM-_-~~-a------
__~._ __u~~-_~M_-~_~--_/,;-__~_ ~ V;~)t<(Ltlssoa'a:l1'tM.______
-------ofr-~--~.- _h. -~-'1hz?~~_::z---
__on -4D.$e~Lu.~__-~- -~---~ be. ~___ _. _-4-_ ---
.--_ -~--~---~-7UJ-/:----~--.~.----- _-____,_-___
__--- ~_- ~~~-~~_--~--~-ad~s-alL.r.~--
----a-~--~~-Itu:-~~-_i~~S:-~-k-4-~.----
--~k..--74..e.-of!d:_~'r~~--aJ-~- ____ _ ~e-_.____-
-~~rrlfir/~-~-~--c~-f-~-~-~-
____~---tk.---~s..
=j)~--~;~--~~-~-~Y-~ -t4_--~4~~_~.-_~d---==~~~~.
---~d-Ikr--M-- ~-- ~~-.1 -~~_-b_~_ - - ~ ~- --.~----
-.L--- --~---f-tk--~--~~;r--- -- - --- ---~---
- ___ ___~&S6?1.__~_ _ _~.fi~- -~_ -~~37!&~~~- uJ_ __
__ _ .___. _'*'~----~u-I:~-- ?IU__ ~_~~--~-~-.-
-~--~--~--~--.~.-~_ a.~____
----~e-/-~-~~-~~7- ~~-~ - - - -"00-220-
-- -;u;L~T:::---_- -- -- - -- - tJtft---- ar-~~~-d-~ ~------ ~---
--~-.--'$;(!~P---Ikr ~:s:~ r--~-~'2/.L-~.-- - -
t .
.-: ., ,. lit..
~. --
e.
e
~~~~~
f~i_~~__- ---4m-'7-IM,----~~ .~~;1t~7t'~),,< ~...
---~-- .---' . ,-
-- -E77'
--d~~
. .
____::e-1~.~-La--~--1~---~ -k M.tL ~_~_~_~~____
_ _ __ ~__~_~ca..rJ?-_~-_~V=t.".s-~_S_.-_:L_C4~~ ~ q ~_
__ _ _ r:e~ ~~_~_~____a.:t_-,230~L3_Q\_c:r.v.:_~___ _~_
--~F--a.f:-_L3~~l.3_~_~_. . .. ----
----- ----- -.---- ---,--------
-~- 0 0--.2 2.-1-.- .
H__ -- _nn__ _ ~._~
"'.' ................ ~..
SINCE
..,.
.
FROEHLJNG & ROBERTSONi INC.
FULL SERVICE LABORATORIES · ENGINEERS & CHEMISTS
"OVER ONE HUNDRED YEARS OF SERVICE"
e
'881
Richmond, Virginia
November 11, 1991
No.
S-55-119
Report of:
Potential Volume Change Tests
Made for:
Graham Henderson & Associates
13715 Sutters Mill Circle
Midlothian, Virginia 23112
Attention.: Mr. Graham Henderson, P.E., L.S..
proj ect:
Johnson - Windy Ridge, Woodlake
'{ll crth QU3.il Hollo"',{, Brnndcrrnill
Date Made:
November 7 and 8, 1991
Upon authorization from Mr. Graham Henderson, three PVC tests were performed on bag
samples submitted to our laboratory by Mr.. Henderson..
"[he test results are as follows;
TESf RESULTS
Sample Depth Swell Index Pressure PVC
Johnson
#1 58" 4419 5.7
Johnson
#2 54H 3866 4.9
~:lr 451t 3338 4.3
_ #1
Severity
Critical
Critical
c: ri t; (" ::11
II
Very truly yours,
John P. Cassidy, Manager
Geotechnical Department
JPC/rw
HEADQUARTERS: 3015 OUM8ARTON ROAD. BOX 27524. RICHMOND. VA, 23261.
TELEPHONE AREA CODE (804) 26J*2701
BRANCHES: ASHEVILLE. NC . BALTIMORE. MD. CHARLOTTE. NC.CHESAPEAKE. VA. '
eRGlET. VA. FAYETTEVILLE, NC . FREDERICKSBURG, VA. GREENVILlE, SC.
RAlElGH. NC . HOANOKE. \fA . STERUNG. VA . SALISBURy. MO
~~l~
CHARTER MEMBER CHARTER MEM8ER M EM BE:::: S I NC E , 904
e
e
t
SilELL Dma vs pOn:HTIAL VOUIHE CHANGE
~ 8000
I I - r I /
70001 /
I /
I
1
-6000 /
5000 /
~ V
. ~/
.u
t.I...I I W
..
C'" :to
:::I --4000
......... --
..:J ~t.y
.-1
~
>C V
~
~ /
:: -3000
...... ~I /1
......
~
c:J
:J / /
en
2000 ~
I .~r
I
1000 :1 /
/ ~
/
,200 / ~
. i.----
---
00 ~
2 - 3 4 - 6 7 8 9 10 II .~
~C.F~::C:3.~rRina 11 pri ti ca J Very Cri.tic.al >
1 ~
Potential Volume Change (PVC)
From "FHA Soil PVC Meter Publication," Federal Housing .Administration
Publication No. 701.
.PVC'Test
Client:
Project:
F&R No:
Sample:
Depth:
Graham Henderson & Associates
Johnson - Windy Ridge, Woodlake
5-55-119
Johnson ff2
541f
Swell Index Pressure (PSF) = 386~
PVC: 4.9
Severity: Critical
...,.- .~ J
e
e
'-
SVEll nrna VS PO"InITIAL VOLDliE CHANGZ
_ 8000
~
70001 /1
V
- 6000 /
I V I
/ .
5000 j
/ I I I
,,-... ~/
.
.:..J ...., 1 I
~ ~
.
r:::- ~
~ -4000
........... J I 1 I
.:::.
,-I I:-t~
~
~ v I j I
~
-.II I
:: -3000
p....t / II 1 I I
,......
,...6
~
:J /
(lJ
2000
V .~pll ,
I
/ );
1000 /
1 v I I
/ 1/
200 / _ ~ _V
OO./'" 2 .3 4 5 ) 7 8 9 10 J,l ~
~cF~O~cal.l1ian'inalr CriticaJ VerY Critic..al '"
"T '~ ~ ,
Potential Volume Change (PVC)
From "FHA. Soil PVC Meter Publication," Federal Housing Administration
Publication No. 701.
.PVC Test
Client:
Project:
F&R No:
Sample:
Depth:
Graham Henderson & Associates
Johnson - Windy Ridge, Woodlake
5-55-119
Johnson #1
58"
Swell Index Pressure (PSF)
PVC: 5.7
Severity: Critical
4411
~ ~
'A-' ;::\.
S 804 8737777
11/ '::"(/'::ll e 1b: 4:J
1\.X SENT
~ $tc~:JiA#s.,,~. ~-"-
_,""_'- !~ME _,_
7), C. h . AVnRY pXwln~
'PGS
~
L.~. UU~~UN ~U!LUC~ !NL.
11~26~91 1~:91 P0&
tJ~l
le: Boil StUdy i
wot 35 ..ott~n,a'l
w1nly aiel,., wOocllJlca
r'~ He.! a-51-t~. !
Gentloman.
"a h.. ob.erYe" .it. conClit1onl an" ..mpl"ct .ail. 'Iat .t.b.
.~ov. .1t. .. rou r.qu..t.d. W. ..t with y~u~ hom. b~r.r~.t th.
.it. on KOV.~.~ let ~"1, i
Tn. hou.. w.. Qompl.t.~ .n~ w.. a basic ,two .to~f .~fuat~.
with. Ittaahe<< ;.raqa In4 a rtar OtCk. Tn. lot 8l0Ped. .119bt~y from
r~ont to ba~k. rootln,., wh.re .xpo.e~, app.a~'d ~o b. 24f1noh..
~ioY tb. 9roun~ .u~t.e.. !
Hand aUi.~ bor1nia wer. .4vAnQ'~ .~ tb. r1Vht front _,d l.ft
rear oorn.r. ot the houla. Thl loil. w.~. ,.n.tally ..n4~ .i~tr
~e4 al.y.. · ·
('Ol\+~ rM S fes-
· dOI\E!.. "i
G.r..h~ U~
aa...<< on .i.1lar t..ts n..rby and in lIiwh>>.r~:{ Woofl., it,
.PP.'N t11at the .0118 art ~.oo)\lhV ..nc!i.~ tow.teS th. w..t .J.d. ot\
Wao41ake with 1... ..ver. volum.-ohmnq_ cnaraoteri.t1o.. I
I<i ince th- houlu. i. com l.te'" W& cannot oQrnraent. on ~ootiD9
oon. Q , e'i, co ng a ep., OD .n; .p ., . 0..
w lei' I.ver. .oil. problaml, the ri.k of dil'lintLal
..t~l'~.n~ pro~~.m. _hQuld ba 1.... 80m. ot.the lte~ .c W.
typ1Dally aU9f..t to m1n1mize tbe ~tt.ot of v.r1_tionl in ~oun4
~QiltUrQ hive al.etdy bl.n don. at eh1* hou... w. nc~.4 th~ ~oOf
quttlra and down.pouts hay. been 1nstlllea and .toun~.t1on ~rain.,
are lMin; 1nat.llecS. .: " '..,
Hf4OQUAfti...I: '011 bUM'A~YON "OAO" DO): ITAU. "'C"MONO. V^J llJil8'.
TSLIPHONI AI\IA i t~) ~1"'2 7n1
I.U.MOHO AiHIV' NO eUL. TfM~ M . CH .--LOTTi. NOt ""K t. VA.
0.-01.'. YA. '4~WlJVJJ.ll, He,'A 'CXlO~,,~ VA. ~=VJ\..t..'1 Ie.
AALI"OH. Nt;. ROlHOkl. VA. ITe"J.t . VA . IALIS_UIllV, MD
m-~l!([~'
,
Em-.
aHOWHOZ~-W.~ m~ITT .n, ~~-__
rf R 5,-, [ t-e.s+s ~~ -flo". Dub.s~ ,~ ~ ~
(9rcL-L.-W~~(~JUUA')~ S1n1 te-S+S-A40 ~ ~ F.R~;
COI\.fi~ ~{.ef"" +e.~+S. Mor+,~ ~ 8-l-;11 Je.o",te..cP.. LoaM,.
t1
,. ,
. \:,~
/' ...
8
804 8737777
11/'::'(/'='1_ 1b:4b
11 7390899 DOBSONRICHHOND
P04
~.~. UU~~UN ~UILU~ IN~.
11/26/91 12: 86
~t'I~
w. would .u99c.t .om. ~9'r.clinw o:t" ~.lDr\c!.Qiap1"9 of tal. tr-ont
rard i~ ord.~ to d~Ai~ .u~t.c. wat.r away t~om the ho~.., fo..
soil oDuld be a~4.4 at ~h. t~ont wI1l inolU41n9 unt.~ tb.i front
.too" then a al1fht ..al. oou~d. ~. Q~t. $.J\to tb. yard- IJ:Q\lnd Jto 1:b.
.ide of the hou.-. At tne r1;ht aid.. y.r~ vater '.bould no~ d~.th
onto ill. ..pbDlt d.1v,wlY, A ...1- ahoulc1 .,.$on ~t'ain water I.J:O\Ind
.nd awar from the hou... Aa fauna.ticr. dra1nl (p.2:forati) art
1nstal1e4, root drain. aould b. pipla in the .am. ~itoh to 1 ad the
wate.. .""at :rom toot.t.nqil. A,l.o, w. typioally .au'I;..t no t . .. or
lar,. ahrub. within 15 t.et of the h~ul.. .
~ Th... .uQo..tiona should help to minimize 80m. at ~h. D~~bl.ma ~
.*aoCl.~.<< with the.. 100.1 .011., ~
v.~ tr~ly ~~ur.,
fROIHLlNQ , ROallrtoM, ~MC.
.~
.~k
k. C16ft 16", P. I.
S.nior Via. .r..id.nt
~ if
.'
i u'
~~
~
r
~~
~.
~~
I.
~
:.: +
~
: :
~ .
r-
.
l
L
!
I
I
!
i
[.
I
J
h
.~ .
\
1
!
j .
8
DEC-13-1991
e
14:33
FROM ~ US MORTGAGE
TO
98042306820
P..02
.;. .
PHH US MORTGAGE CORPORAtION
2780880 ~
SI:R.U:l Q. nm:N, 'lmFSA..DlS:N
6 F ANrASY TRAIL
FIEICImR, NC 28732
DESCRIPTION OF REQUESTED CREDIT:
1.. In compliance with RegUlation "B" (EQual Credit Opportunltv Act). you are adVised that your recent application for
an extens; on or renewal of c:redi t has been deel i ntel by the Lender. The dec ision to der. y you r appl icati on was based on
the fal' owi ng principal reasons:
A. CREDIT
. ( ) No credit file
( ) I nsuffieient cred i t references'
( ) I nsuffi cient erect it file
( ) Unable to verify credit references
( ) Garnish men!. attachment, foreclolu re,
re po sse 1$ ion or suit .
· ( Tax or other Ii ens
( Excessive obi igations
( De I i nquent credit obI igations
( ) Bankruptcy
.B. EMPLOVMENT STATUS
( J Unable to verify employment
( ) Length of employment
( ) T empotary or irregular employment
C. INCOME
( ) I nsufficient income
( ) Unable to verify income
2. OlSCLOSURE OF USE OF INFORMATION OBTAINED FROM AN OUTSIDE SOURCE
( ) Oisclosu re inappl icabl e . t
( ) In compliance with Fair Credit RepOrting ACt, Section?615.. your 8J)plieation was decrlned either wh.olly or partly.
because of: '.
Information obtained in B report; from a consumer reporting agency:
LENDER:
LOAN NUM8E~:
APP lJ CANT {S) :
AOOR ESS!
OATE:
12/13i91
D..
RESIDENCY
( ) Temporary resid B nCS
( ) Too short a peri ad of residence .
( ) Unable to verify residence
~I
OTHER
) Insufficient Liquid A$Set$ to close the loan
) Denied by: ( J FHA I ) VA
( ) FNMA/FH LMC ( ) private mortgadB
insurer
( . ) Credit appll catlon t "complete
toe) I nadequate collateral
( ) We do not grant credit to any DPpl icant 0 n the
terms and co"~ition$ you request.
· ( ) Withdrew a ppl ication
lOC) ~!'ROPER1Y DOES NOT ~1EEI BUILDThTG CODES
( )
....:
(FUL.L NAME.OF CREDIT BUR~AU)
(AD D R ~55 & T Ii LKPHO Nfi NO.)
t f you contact the a bove agency, you h Bve 'the right to Inspect end receive a co py of your report. .1 n addi t ion, you
are entitl ed to II fur I di eel osure of the nat\lre and su bstance of a II' info rmation (except med ica I) on you j n sa id
age nCY.$ fi les.
( J I nformat io n obtained from an outside source other than a consumer reportl n9 agency II V ou have the right to
make a written request of us for disclosure of the nature of this jl,formation. However. to be honored, such
written request must be rec:eived by us within 60 days from the date you receive this notice. Mail the request to
us at the address on the face of this letter..
3. The Federal Equal Credit Opportunity Act prohibits credItors from dIscriminating against credit applicants on the basis
of race .. color, rei igi on. national or igi n, sex. marital status, age (provided that the appl icant hat the capacity to enter into
a binding contract); because all or part of the applicanf's income derives from any pubUe assistance program; or because
the appl (cant has in good fa ith e)(etcised any right under the Co "Su mer Crod it Protection Act. The Federal Agency that
administers compliance with this law concerning this creditor is the Federal Trade Commission, Equal Credit Opper..
tuhhy, Washington. D.C. 20580, (202) 724-1140.
4. Should you have any additional information which might assist us in evaluating your creditworthinen.. pleasR Jet us
know ~ Thank you for apply Ingj l. .
Notice ( ) delivered or ~) mailed on 12/13/91
· f "'dl~t" It.",s not found on st.tement Of
roa50ns fOI at!v.,.. action eoftt;llnod on tn.
Ample fOrM fOUow~.,.g S9Gtfon 202..9,~(b) (2).
800_lI.lA,6-0963
Phone Number
WHITE. Applicant . YELLOW · PUe
~~!~f!I!-!!f .P! R~2!f! FOR CREDIT DEHW.. TtRMINATION. ~ C=HMGI
BY:
~IOC
Lender's Ad dr~$S
PI Nt< · Qua thv Control
TOTAL P.02
~';I
808-9891
rj
I
/,-/,1{.
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
MEET ING DATE:
March 11, 1992
ITEM NUMBER;
14.A.
SUBJECT:
Public Hearing for Proposed Amendment to Streetscape
Standards for Midlothian Village Districtu
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
R,~ ft~~ 1 ~
p/wcbf'l.~ ·
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
BACKGROUND:
On December 17 I 1991, the Planning Commission held a public
hearing as requested by the Board of Supervisors to consider a
draft Zoning Ordinance Amendment establishing.unique streetscape
standards for the Midlothian Village District.
The Planning Commission voted to recommend apPI'oval of the
attached amendment which requires compliance with these
standards. If approved, all new development within the
Midlothian Village District (see boundaries map) will be required
to conform to the Village of Midlothian Streetscape Plan
requirements for installation of trees and low plant materials,
sidewalks, light fixtures, benches and trash receptacles.
This public hearing followed the completion of a contract for
professional services approved by the Board on Octoaer 24, 1990.
.The consultant team worked closely with staff, citizens, business
owners, the Virginia Department of Transportation and utili ty
companies to prepare detailed plans and specificati9ns for the
installation of aesthetic improvements in e Village of
PREPARED BY~
Thomas E. Jac son
Director of Planning
ATTACHMENTS: YES II
NO []
SIGNAT URE :
~
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
00
lMARl192/A:AGENDA2/gok
"
It
e
;-r-
AGENDA ITEM
PUBLIC HEARING FOR PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO
STREETS CAPE STANDARDS FOR MIDLOTHIAN VILLAGE DISTRICT
MARCH 11, 1992
PAGE 2
Midlothian wi th special emphasis along a 1. 2 mile segment of
Route 60. The products include a set of plan drawings for
Midlothian's Village District (see boundaries map) and a
technical manual containing drawings and specifications of the
plan IS reconunenda tions for trees, plants, sidewalks, benches,
decorative lighting, etc. These documents have been reviewed by
staff and approved by the thirty (30) member Midlo"thian Citizen
Beautification Advisory Committee who contributed toward their
development.
As a result of extensive community participation, the Village of
Midlothian Volunteer Coalition was formed on July 10, 1991, for
the purpose of implementing this streetscape plan. As funds are
raised, such improvements will be made on public as well as
private land. To date, nearly $20,000 in grant funds have been
awarded by the Virginia Department of Forestry for project
construction and over $10,000 has been contributed by the
Chesterfield Business Council, local businesses, civic
organizations and individuals.
The Village of Midlothian Volunteer Coaliti-on reconunends that
these landscape and streetscape standards be adopted as part of
the Zoning Ordinance so that developers of new buildings within
the Midlothian Village District will install trees and low plant
materials, sidewalks, light fixtures, benches and trash
receptacles according to the plan's construction drawings (sample
attached) . Copies of these detailed drawings are available at
the County Planning Department and from the Village of Midlothian
Volunteer Coalition.
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended the Board adopt the proposed amendment to the
Zoning Ordinance relative to development, standards in the
Midlothian Village District.
Attachments:
Proposed Zoning Ordinance Amendment
Midlothian Village District Boundaries Map
Sample Technical Manual Construction Drawings
lMAR1192/A:AGENDA2/gok
00 223
..n:.... ..
e
e
'V
AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE CODE OF THE COUNTY OF
CHESTERFIELD, 1978, AS AMENDED, BY AMENDING AND
REENACTING SECTIONS 21-67.33.1 AND 21.1-255.4 RELATING
GENERALLY TO DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS IN VILLAGE DISTRICTS
BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of
Chesterfield County:
(1) That section 21-67.33.1 of Chapter 21 of the Code
of the County of Chesterfield, 1978, as amended, is amended
and reenacted to read as follows:
section 21-67.33.1.
requirements.
For ya~a -- ~eql:l~~ement9 setbacks and landscaoinq
reauirements within such setbacks I see chapter 21.1, article
6, division 4, section 21.1-255.5 for B Districts anaL
Section 21.1-255.6 for M Districts and sections 21.1-255w4
and 21.1-255.8 for Band M Districts.
lia~a
Setback
and
landscaoing
(2) That section 21.1-255.4 of Chapter 21.1 of the
Code of the County of Chesterfield, 1978, as amended, is
amended and reenacted to read as follows:
Sec. 21.1-255.4. Exceptional development standards.
000
(b) Landscaoinq. For landscaoinq within setbacks
along major arterials and within front and corner setbacks
alona riqhts-of-way other than major arterials, all
development in the Midlothian Villaqe District shall conform
to the recommendations set forth in The Villaqe of
Midlothian Technical Manual dated September 1991. In all
other Villaae Districts, Agt least one (1) large deciduous
treel as defined in section 21.1-224(b) (2), shall be
included in each landscaped area, in lieu of the one (1)
small tree required by section 21.2-225(b).. All other
landscaoinq requirements of sectiona 21..1-225, 21.1-255.5w
21.1-255.6 and 21.1-255.8 shall apply a~-aeseri},ea in all
Village Districts.
0700:265.txt
(12/4/91)
-1-
00 224
",.
~ ._<".~~ ..
e e
:1 Key Map - Village Boundaries
\
~
'Ci1
--
....
o
~
~
0.)
~,
-t
~O"
00 225
The Village of Midlothian
Page 4
0 I
~ .'
..J
~
.....
Q
~
0 0
c: \.Q
OJ tlo.. I a
>- > I
~t: , .....
. ,... 0 q----I' 0
~ == -5
0 0 :::t
"'0 0
... ~
0
~ L? oj
>
II ~c
0 ......l 0
"tj ,g =
~ 0
~ '" "'tI'
0 ~ loll
0
(.) "S (;)
GI
CL. .....J
>- oS
QJ c
0 >..
~ "0 ""
u ~
... ~
0 u :a
......, "5 g..
0 >--
~ c
ill 0
-0
fa ,..... u
~ QI w
~ -- -; B
~ \ c: ....
ftI
f-t ill C)- o
)..f ~
(Tj \ 0 f
Q "r"""4
O-c - -- , -l
tb Q)
\ P..
~ dl\ iii >..,
~ S f-4
0 L Ji
\
,....-t - ---l
0 \D
U &\ M
QJ
J-4 ~
QJ - - - -- -- -- - - -- - - - f--4
......
H
ftS
~ J:
U ~
~
~
,..., ::;
'f"""( ~
p... l1J --.
ro ~ ':::li
~ ~
~ ~
r-- ~
~
~ '--
Q) I J rr ~
~ ilAf.JO UOP.l~O a, 00 l") ') 6
~~
e
..... -~ .
.....
.....
'"I
~
Qt
t:S
~
I
I
--
.w_ _ _ ____
............ ..........
''-. '1""~ e e
- , -4:
~ J
... Type 1 Village Fringe Rt. 60
..
Columnar Trees with DayliIies and Sidewalk
(outboard side of ROW)
3 t Otto Luyken Cherry Laurel
. .
12'
12'
Reference Details
Tr~e Planting
Shrub Planting
Daylily Planting
Bulb PLanting
Daylily Bed CUTVI1 Geom~rry
Daylily Planting Location Guide Village Fringe
DaylilylBulb Planting Plan I Village Fringe
DaylilylBulb Planting Plan I Village Fringe
DaylilylBulb Planting Plan I Village Fringe
DaylilylBulb Planting Plan I Village Fringe
Light Fixture
Sidewalk with Planted Utility Strip
Curb Cut for New Sidewalk
Specifications
Plant List
Route 60
Y~Jlow
Gold
Pink
- R~d
Hornbeam
Grass
01.
23'
Page Number
30
3 1
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
46
49
5 1
53
54
00
227
])"",,..,,,, 7'
The Vi llall(e of Mid faf !ria 1"!
/4,f;t
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVl SORS
AGENDA
.......
1.0 ~
MEETING DATE: March 11, 1992
14.B.
ITEM NUMBER;
SUBJECT: PUBLIC HEARING: To Consider the Conveyance of Right of Way
Along Claypoint Road and Bailey Bridge Road to the Virginia
Department of Transportat~on
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR' 5 COMMENTS:
R~ t),~
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
Staff requests the Board to approve the conveyance of right of way and
temporary construction easements at the The~a Crenshaw Elementary
School for the consideration of $8,276.00 to the Virginia Department of
Transportation for road improvements along Claypoint and Bailey Bridge
Roads and to authorize the County Administrator to execute the
necessary option and the Chairman of the Board and County Administrator
to execute the necessary deed.
The conveyance and the consideration have been reviewed by necessary.
staff and approval is recommended.
RECOMMENDATION':
Staff recommends that the Board approve the conveyance and authorize
the County Administrator to execute the necessary option and the
Chairman of the Board and County Administrator to execute the necessary
deed upon approval by the County Attorney's Office.
DISTRICT,: Ma toaca
,.I
ATTACHMENTS: YES .
NO C
PREPARED B~ ~LJ-z.lr-/L/'YI
'V
John W. Harmon
Property Mgmt. Supervisor
Right of Way Division
Department of Utilities
SIGNAT URE :
~
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
00
BOS-9891
,___ VICINITY SKETCH
PUBI,.IC HEARING TO WNSIDER THE CONVEYANCE .IGHT OF WAY ALONG
CLAYPOINT ROAD AND BAILEY BRIDGE ROAD TO VDOT
. ,. jV" ,-x '~.. 1.:;1
,v .,,'~% /,~, 'f'.e,,~./
o ~r ~ i 0 -
,'~ .~\~ l"1:.~,r;
'-'. I ~ . / I
, ~'- ..,~.!j;'- ~
) -- ".l p""";; ~'< :
! MAYFAIR
I ESTATES
{ '.~
\
n..__ _ . ')\,"_~ a_~____.__~___ ~_.
,,,-{~ ~,o~ j
~,VI..
(~'=o ~)t
~:./))
:i
~
:'__~~ O~~{:~lkGS~:;' "
I
i
l
.f;J. i
~f ~ j
( Ii I. #;
# POCAHONTAS~\~"t
~t9 ~_// II , I ACRES~ ~:
~ . JJ I ":"'\~ ~ I
. 11- ._, f !' C'-fti
j 1 I i
@\ ~51 ~. ---;'-'.- ..;. -';~. :liD
, tis. V \, _.0.9 ..: .. ~ ::~_ ~ :: F" ~,..~" ~ ,.~.~. ~f .1" j
~--~-Jr7J~ 1P. .. ~o/' 1 ~', ,_.... -,' '-f .. . ';..
.t~:01F " ~{~ ~~:!;::l;;.));.~ ~'(i(~i
~/ '.:n< i-:,>",~'I'~ \ I'~~~;~')" ~.J~~: . ~/'~-(.,.~, f" t- '-1u > l' ~
'<>1.....,,- ,'-'; ,....; , ~. f- '. " · \ ---r-C r -,' ,', '-' - ,. -,.( ~~- :
~'~{t~~( ~~U~h~~P(::.7/;~1~~.\~, i ,: i
C'h~~"~.;-"; ~"'1. ,...,...: .._ t ." ("~~.":.r-' ,....-f...or: ~ _._~;;
/; -'.rr.eE1.~(,r'{'r:"';": ..:",:.i.('(';,- -~.. jI:(;~I."'~., ,(,~ ra :/ .
,~~.Ll ~- fJ.... .;":, t ......... ,...~-...:..... (').~, .f. :' ~ '. _ =.: Oafe MI
, .</ /~:!~ ,.-;.:(... 1.1 " ,."~.., ~ :... ~~-;' _\" :- ~.:.-1- j':-,_ .:. ~. ',:,1 Pa[
~,
1\
1/
~ ~
)-
/i{
I
I
l
\ l~
l......~-~ ~
\~
~\~
~
~,.i
(.
j
,'~\ I
:~~ I
,
](
~
i:
,
00
22
.:' /<
IX I
:T~?I i-
~J~;
.....,
'. ~
i....
Jt:: ~
(;J :'l
o ,/
~3 f2
(./
" ,
I.
I~~~ i __.J
l-t J.. fL': j ~<
C
r~~
0-
C
C
d1
l;:
II" l' .-. .; _ f[~~ C '" P
\J:I p~)V'j ~ .'
..j J ()
J-'~?:~.3~yl, 1) ~,
"~~' '~1. 'y}"'I/ ~r:.. :J..J G{~_l
:;;l~::~:- : .:; ,. I) I.J (':i'J''r,"J
_))_1 ~ : ~~:_, -~o~ ;:'~::
/ ?- .... "-
/ 1/ .. -- :::: .~ ,......, \
/ f/ 1;/ "':'''',\ '\\\ "
{' ~ ~\
, \\ "~ \
It \\ \\ \
\ \ \\ \\ \
\:\\ ~\ \\ \
\\ \ \
\ \ \\ \\ \,
\\ \\ \\ \
\\ '\1 '\'
\ \ '\\ - \\ \
\\ \ \
\\ '\\ \
--u\ '..;', -~.\", \~\ ''\\ \
\\ \
\\ \
\\ \
\\ \
\\ \
\\ '\\ \
\\ \\ \
\\ \\ \
\ \ . ~ \
t~ U \
:P"'" Il II I
r II II 1
t1l II II I
P' I; II j
I:' /j /
// /;
_'~ I ~ I
:::.' ~; ... -:::: ..~ ~. --. (j /
p;/-;..//
-;./ ./
..:. -. .;.: ....:; -=- t - -. ~:-.~;..' ~- 6]
fl!
...-/
\~
\/
\
t1f'\
~
,I ~ I L ...-
(. ,
b "
~ ~l .~-
L ~- f.
~ ';,~ J :i:
~~ ~;
('L :;,...
-1
~~1
f" .
r '? tjl ': ~
"":,. ~.
, , \
~ ~ ~ f
L t\ ! , i
; ~ ~'; ~'~'
. -. ~~h~.". r:,~~.I~: .;~ I~ .
'.L',{:~p~~;~;~.' :
,...,,_ .;'\.u1."''':l5
I
(?
1;
() (1J.
6l ~I
::J 1~~
.....J ..-(1
1') (is
(...
-(] 0
Cl
;;, ~i /
/~
l' ~
C t)l
c~ 9
o
1;~ IV
()J i v
~i~ / / L/Y/
0Y!./~ \':)
y~"", Q. <::...!H~"~{~'Q.,\ \::.~"'l:;::,,,""<;.(I_ ,--, .
V\\d _ \~ ~ ~..~_ \I..~Q.. \.. \ ~ G>j~'.l
~~~C'l1o~ o;,Q.~& _ ~~ \\~~\... .'-.Q.<'C...
~\.~,\\ll.L. ':i\~.l.y.., ~ l~..r::. "",".::I ~ ~ :'::.';'\. e c..,.....t...
.-.:,: '" f\~ \~.. ~\\ - \~~ \ \~ Q" L\ ~
. d .() ...{J ,p (' /I 0 (7 q ,
L ., ('" ,{) ,0 r .A 0 ~ .1... ~ · ~ I
( . n .,...( j J r - r' /' (,' ~ r~
II I' ~/ . ~ )"1./ -: UJ J if S ..-.; ~
U) (I ~ :/ lJ b (7 0 ,~ J. <t 0 1)
:.j () / .r ~Yo J r :)?"o 1; fI q ~
} cI rt tP - r l p ()) (f r:. .;- c
J .~ ~S ~)\ ~~ ;p , ~ ~t '
o : ()' Cl .1.0 r; .
.;1 ~ I; ~.J
.J LT
....-1
I~J
\... " l;}:.
( ;-~)
\...:.., ~-
(fl
P ~
C)~
(jJ~
/IP
.Jl !J
r....O
r.J (.'
f r~
.' '/1-; r~~ ~~. ~....j, ..
/
.()
(:1 J
~l ~?
~ ~:--
r ~~''''
~ (J.
)t :..
& j
~
, ~
jJ r-'/ ,. L. ('
J~~q ~
~~ ~ ~.' ~l b
~ ~ ..' :.1
. J~-:;
~ ~ .~ .It
. ~ '~
~J~[i
~ ~~O
.' ,.; ~
II'
..a
{7
r"" .
/
(ji
..
d'
J
(;-
r; ;}
I),f')
;r {O
.j(
..iC-
(" 11
0-
~ :.
.; ~ 0.
a Q ~
. 0 ~
~ ~ ~
b 3
:I 0
~~ .g,
~ ;;
::r
:
~
~o..
~
.I
~}.
.gr
?' ,.
F
.:;:
.J
_I
o
....,
-Q
/" ;:
~
~ jJ. ,.)~
;..rf~ -j r f
-n.....f"'-~l.
-- ~
C
r~J-: : ~
('\ j in S
f~~t
. (" uy 4'l
G ~. ~9 ."
~ffr;
~ C-~ (;
a 1'.-' ....J
'" jJ...-~
1-'
..... Ul -i
::r:c:o
rn [JJ
'_ D
0' nl rn
rHnCl
.o""""""c
J'>. ,.
:0--.....,
.-...jO........ :
~()O "
2:J::'Z
-..;.p .
:::: ~,
~-::
010
~ n.
UlQ
..:J ::-" ~
.1"1 :U
f1l r:) ,
~I
m
QC
-Ii
m '-1
n :U
pll-
VI """l L
~~ ~~~
~L
~ ~:
2
-..../
808-9891
/11 C a
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVI SORS
AGENDA
MEETING DATE: March 11, 1992
14.C.
ITEM NUMBER:
SUBJECT; PUBLIC HEARING: Ordinance to Vacate a 5' Easement
COUNTY AOMINISTRATOR't S COMMENTS:
I<lj..O~J A~
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
Mr. Richard J. Grecki has submitted an application requesting the
vacation of a 5' easement across lot 96, Summerford Subdivision,
Section A. This easement is no longer needed since cable will be
installed in the front of the lot. This request has been reviewed by
staff and approval is recommended.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the Board adopt. the ordinance to vacate the
easement across lot 96, Summerford SUbdivision, Section A.
DISTRICT: Ma toaca
PREPARED
fL2~.m~~
ATTACHMENTS: YES If
n W. Harmon
Property Mgmt. Supervisor
Right of Way Division
Department of Utilities
NO 0
SIGNATURE;
~
COUNTY ADM I NI STRATOR
00 231
~ ..
. VICINITY SKETCH
REQ\JEST _FROM MR. ECKI TO VACATE AN EASE
T ACROSS LOT 96
:@J
{.
I.....
F~.
J 4. Ro.A/ .
: \\ It lWtt,ltGtON:
t 'l\~; ~~r'l(W, a~~
l,~ f9. r ;I
, .., "'0.;. I . <7,,/ ~ ':";
t,~ ~~F ~ ~?" . >~ _
\ " '\ o;r;~"""'+4", -:~
. - ------ ..u_ -- . \~ ~~~)'~f)~--- Un ::\ -- --
-..' " ~,t"~,r~ J Sg )S~ "t -~
.,~ ......J >IJ(""l ~~ ~ .~ '
~ 3 i a: ~/I ~ ~ ~ . ' ~
i'l & I~ to') ,;:; ~ !'~ __ _. "~~
I ~tlHlGHGAn. ' .--'
J r:r' HilL CT
@
.....~'"::.:
~/
~V
~~
vtl
A}'
..iE-"~- '- - u. .
.";'~~~~~~
..::7
~V'.~~-
jf
_.$-- +
/~.,~.
-~. - ~-- ~,-;;;r- -- ,. --- - -.- - --- .--- _._~ ---- --. - &..-
.;
/
-~!J
:,."')'
._~~;:t
.i
-~
~_a~ .,
0lil(" --~-- '.~
~ ~;-
.:: J
~~~.
.. ~~.
I _.~A/; _~ _..._.
\~~
l'f
00 232
~ ;
'!) I
I
I
:"htS 'S Iv ~f'1Ttr.,. 1"'.' I In~a. .n .CCu...e 'lehJ .s..J. ~ If" of 1ne D'emrSes sno." ne,eoo_ 0'1.. ClU .mOlOtl.menl, .na ..s.men,s known at ""'.br. ;ill. snown ".,eo": that
'''e-,. i" no enCfOclCnm .nts OV 1m pro~emen' s e .1,"11"' trom .a(J~OtnmQ ,,'em'SI! or t, "m S u Creer c rltmt '!i.S upon Jdro rn In g p t.m.s.. othe, I" an snown n.rlOn. Th'l-
~ w.1 hnq u _ __ ... ___ ....1 run a HUD .J~ n rH19a 11000 ".l ",rei a'e.. .
PropOsed
--
Lor 95
l(j
~~
C)
?()~ 5" \\j
~
41
~
1
EA~e:I-Je:NT TO
& " ,c:..ATEl;)
r\~
I~~~
0~1;.1 93DZ
0BSt>~J StlMMJ5eL,oo.c
O~0 . P~E
Date: e-<;-'31
WT 9Gl.. S'ECT/Or/_ /~..
SUMMe~rOIE'JJ
CheSterfield Counrl./~ Virginia
Scale: /'1~50'
Job No.:J~//0041
~
B'
~ -,
/ ~ /' s-e:: k../e r
-h, Cosernen r
.....
a
~
'-'0 I '3'7
· PLANNERS · ARCHITECTS · ENGINEERS. SURVEYORS.
501 Branchway Road · Suite 100 · Richmond, Virginia 23236 · 794.0571 . Fax 794-2635
,q E FLEeTING T'CJh40RROW
, Richmond _
Newspapers, ff1J11fo
A n Affiliate of Media General
e
P.o, BOX C-32333
RICHMOND, VIRGINIA 23293-0001
804-649-6000
CUSTOMER
ACCOU NT NU MBE
22(>8()6
DATE
()3/()4/92
COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
RTTN: JOAN DOLEZAL
~I. O. BOX 4(1
CHESTERFIELD VA
DATE
CODE
23832
DESCRIPTION
RUNS
CHARGES
CREDITS
TOTAL
INCHES AMOUNT
LINES
29
189. e)8
(.)2/26/
LEGAL NOTICE
VACATE 5 EASEMENT ON
LOT 96 SUMMERFORD
TAKE NOTICE:
That on the 1 tth day of March
1992, at 7:00 p.m. or as Soon
thereafter as may be heard, the
Board of Supervisors of Chester-
fi eld Cou nty a t ~ ts reg u lar meetrng .
place.in the Board Room of Ches~. ~
1erfield County, VlTgjnia. will con. ~
. sider the following ordinance for t
adoption:" .
AN ORDINANCE to vacate 5'
easement on lot 96, Summerford
SubdMsion, Section A, Clover Hill
District, Chesteriield. Virginia, as
shown on a p'at thereof by Batzer
& Assoc., tnc.. dated September
19, 1990, duly recorded in the
Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court
of said County in Plat Book '74,
Pages .10-15.
The complete text of the proposed
. ordinance and conveyance is on
~l file in the office of ,the rroperty
i Management Supervisor In Ches-
. terfield Coun t virginia1 and may
< be examined ~y alllnterested par-
i ties between the hours of 9:00
i a.m. and 5:00 p.m., Monday
. throuFlh .Frird~y+ ~ . ~ .
1
2
Richmond N~wspapers~ Inc.
r:'ub ~ i sher clf:
THE RICHMONp TIMES-D~SPATCH
THE RICHMOND NEWS LEADER
~ ~
. ,
This is to cert~fy that the att~ched LEG~L NOTIC~
was published by Ri~hmond Newspaper~, Inc., ~n the C~ty
of Richmond, State bf Virginia, on ~he faIloring dat~s:
I
i
i
~
I
:
T i rnes-Di spat eh
,
i
;
News Leader
()2/2$/92
()3/C)4/92
The fir-st
i Yls~rt i Clrf be i Y"Jg
I
. ~
9 1 V ~ Y"t. . . .
I
()2?,26/92
Sworn to and;subscr~bed before
this
<tlld~/
Nc~t a "r"'Y j:1u ~ 1 i e-
State of Virginia '
C i t Y Ct f R i eh rncq",d
My commissioh expires
!
i
!
--....."..,.....--~ ...j. ,--*'~
My Com m fssi on Expires Ju ne 30, 1996
. l
I
WHEN REMITTING P~EASE REFER TO YOUR CUStOMER # 2~0806 !
'U@lf{OO, ~ ~ I
189. ()8
f /'.'''.' 0 ~ " ;~.;- (,) (I \;. \ 0- A o'j
( /'- ~~ . ~'" I..... " ~~ 1{~ {'....... ~. ~ AJ: -\ t"":,~ ~:Z (to ~ <;r "J1.. <'f,\ r.( ~ .-,. ~.r~
j<.>v"jJ.~ \J,1I' ",,'.n)"/ vvi" -) ",'-)'0.jJ Jt~~ Q i'~ ~~~~>' Wlt,.o..)- v v
...
~~ ,~. ~~.~ i~
0/0 CASH DISCOUNT IF PAID ON
OR BEFORE 15th OF THE SUCCEEDING MONTH.
NO DISCOUNT ALLOWED THEREAFTER.
&_"'''.~-!'~'''':'. '~'~'~.T"1 ~l' J~Tfl\ro ~.. ~ ^ T~~"':1'~'
:~"~ l 1"~',:"~ :1',,11: I~~ ~\'~'-.n'~ j',./~lJ.\1 ':'~'.I~
. ......!.. .V... ...... l..;., 'Ut .... ..J- . '\ ~..:.l ~' .. ,...) . L..':. ~r. ~4. -'~ _!.;. "
. ~ #j
14jj)~
i.
f'
CHEST~RFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERViSORS
AGENDA
MEETING DATE: March 11, 1992
14.D.
ITEM NUMBER;
SUBJECT: PUBLIC HEARING: Ordinance to Vacate a 16' Easement
COUNTY AOMINISTRATORt 5 COMMENTS:
R~I 4~
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION;
Mr. and Mrs. Kevin B. Clasbey have submitted an application requesting
the vacation of a 16' sewer easement across lot 31, Southshore
SUbdivision, Section A. This easement is no- longer needed due to the
dedication of a new easement. This request has been reviewed by staff
and approval is recommended.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recormnends that the Board adopt, the ordinance to vacate the.
easement across lot 31, Southshore Subdivision, Section A.
DISTRICT: Clover Hill
ATTACHMENTS: YES pi
PREPARED~-J 6Y~
John W. Harmon
Property Mgmt. Supervisor
Right of Way Division
Department of Utilities
NO L1
SIGNAT URE :
~
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
00
BOS~9891
. VICINITY SKETCH
REQUE~T FROM MR.. S. CLASBEY TO VACATE A
WER EASEMENT ACROSS LOT
... 1./
,
/@J
/-
l!~ <::
\i-
~\L
- i] a. RO,.,ol ~
J ~ ~~ l~EAMJ~GTO~:
.~~ ~ 8t1?~()~ ~j.J
t \r ~ ()4/ PKWY ~
~\~ 4'-9a f. / ' BIRKDAL ~ : \ ! i
\ ~~. ff<' '~~! : " /~
, r~..r!'4r1t4,~ <_-. " ~~
\ I~ ~ ' . ~~\ I -
).~ - ~O~~(~fi~~~1J:~l;- r :~ ,--- -----~1~/" -- --- ......~_."..
'\ $'11 ,~.i g #L~,~ i P: ! !
~ Ire: V) ~~, I .~~ j .
~L ~ ~~ ~ j..,,;~ ''''-~ ',~:, . :
; $J~GAn. ----\ \~ f :
I o::Y Hill. CT '-~ , i i
@ ," .
,j~' _ __ n <~~;;~~~___":_~_______"
f
;..J"
~}I
?"
~~..,
n,
~ t : .
} ,i
+
~g.
______~_ m '
----....- - -.. ....--
~:o!
.._.:;;::;J, ~.- .--- ---._ ~ ..-.. ._ __
If
00
235.
e
· 110re: /G~ S'eUJer t:;5rn~t: ro b:e vacored I 7otJ- MapFlo..:G./-/4{/)-B
.; waG de:::iicC7/ed In .oB.~p /580. -...
OlUner: Kevin S. ec6heJlQ D. C/~tpe4 ___.~.--... Ch
~.B. 'Et:::eJCJ p./~o. ~O... "- (:
(~ "
~(j / J~ ~ V Q
(;V./ . ... ~ rf1J;;:::0 -. U c::
(l) ~ /... .. -.,fer ~p./6go ~ ~
f).. · '6e;v-J~ ---- ~
~ '{/ ,/ ) · "" i6t~L~&O':'-- --- m
Q ()y ~. · :.tJ?:b--- ___" -----... (j
t"J ~V 1/fJ: ~.--- "" / s ~
~ 0 i/( ~ " ~~
. '\ ,0lc.y':1.:" I "J(pV "... GlQ
J\ - 0/ · / 0
_ 0) ~. I-" I .11/1
- ~ ~~ ~ W 3/
~o' f. I \;-lfJ
ciS'z" .. ~
~"2-~a." I' @
- prot... - -:JZ... .
~/miT5 ~ /00 Year ~
Flood PIOin~'"
" .. \ ...
.. .
... .. .. .. .. .
. ~.
~r width tlaQ
5/ope flGDroin. f55m~
.........
o
c:
~
Qj
LO
1]
~
3:A
· PLANNERS. ARCHITECTS. ENGINEERS. SURVEYORS.
501 Branchway Road. Suite 100 . Richmond, Virginia 23236 . 794..0571 . Fax 794-2635
1514 East Parham Road. Richmond, Virginia 23228 . 262-6046 . Fax 264-3037
Date:o=r /~ ICJ91
Scale: /1,.. /00/
Job No.: t=-G56- /
i:l' E F LECT I NG T 0 pr.,.+OR~ a w
00 236
RitClhmond .
NeW5paper5, lI1J1ltCo
.
An Affiliate of Med ia General
P.o. BOX C-32333
RICHMOND t VIRGI NIA 23293-0001
804-649-6000
COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
ATTN: JOAN DOLEZAL
~I. O. BOX 4()
CHESTERFIELD VA
23832
DATE
DESCRIPTION
CHARGES
LINES RUNS I
CREDITS
TOTAL
INCHES AMOUNT
~
()2/26/'32
i
I
I
I
I
I
I
LEGAL NOTICE
VACATE A 16' SEWER
EASEMENT ON LOT 31;
2'3
~.
Co
189. ()8
Richmond Newspapers, Inc.
~'ub ~ i sher elf'
THE RICHMONp TIMES-D~SPATCH
THE RICHMOND NEWS LEADER
i
..
TAKE NOTJCE;
That on the , 1 th day of March
1992, at 7:00 p.m. or as soon
thereafter as may be heard, the
Board of Supervisors of Chester.
field County at its regular meeting
place in the Board Room of Ches-
terfield County, Vi rginia, will con-
sider the following ordinance for
adoption: '
AN ORDINANCE to vacate a 16'
sewer easement on Lot 31 ,
Southshore Subdivision; Clover
Hill Oi st ri ct, Ches te rfi e Id, VI rglni a,
as shown on a plat thereof by
Balzer & Assoc., Inc., dated Octo-
ber 17, 1991, duly recorded in the
, Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court
of satd county in Plat Book 77,
Pages 71 & 72.
; The complete text of the proposed
. ordinance and conv~ance is on
~:n~ ~~ee~ff~ o:Vi~O~ ~rc;~
. terf~el~ County, e:.ginial and may
~:sex~~:~n brh~" hn~~:s~fd ~:~o t
: a.m. and 5~OO p.m., Monday i
. }...~~OUOh Fridav. ~m ,... ...;, .
J
I
I
~
i
I
This is to certify that the att~ched LEGAL NOTICE
was published by Richmond ~ewspaper~, Inc., ~n the C~ty
of Richmond, 'State bf Virginia, on ~he following dat~s:
) I '
,
N~ws Leader
C)2/2~/92
()3/ ()4 /92
I
i
f
- ,
T i rnes-Di sp~tch
"rhe f i t"'st
i
i rJs~"'"Iot i C.YI be i )'"1 9
!
9 i v ~ yo,. . . .
~
I
!
02~,::p/'32
and~subscr~bed before
State of Virginia
C i t y c. f Rich roc-rid
j
._,........-+-- .
My Commf$sion txp'res June 10t 1996
My commission expir~s '
~ :'. /,'. ~':'<", :...'
'. , f"~ ~ t.... I " ';. /' 1"'
,~ ~:~.~.~ :~';: ,,~~- ~.:r:' ~::~ t:~ ':. . - -'
I
i
I
. I
CUSTOMER # 220806 I
'U@U'B{!, @X\Ilg c::::> I 1 8'3. 08
WHEN REMITTING P~EASE REFER TO~YOUR
.# "T ~ 1". ~ +...... I """.." ~ /
0/0 CASH DISCOUNT IF PAID ON
OR BEFORE 15th OF THE SUCCEED1NG MONTH.
NO DrSCOUNT ALLOWED THEREAFTER.
_ . ~ ~ + .~ .~. ~ ~;.~ :!:;~ '~-~ :i... ~ =/~l.::~~~ =-: ~>!~ ~ ~ ~
.' ~ ]~}:~ ~~ =~.~~:,.
jl{ic/hmond e
Newsptf7lpers, Info
An Affiliate of Media General
.
P.o. BOX C-32333
RICHMOND, VIRGINIA 23293-0001
804-649-6000
COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
ATTN: JOAN DOLEZAL
~I. o. BOX 4CJ
CHESTERFIELD VA
LEGAL .NOT I CE
CLAYJ:'O I NT ROAD &
BAILEY BRIDGE ROAD'
DATE
I
i
02/26/9~
j
B
,
!
""AKE NOT1CE:
That on the 11 tn day 01 March
1992, at 7:00 p.m. Or as soon
thereafter as may be heard. the
Board of Supervisors of Chester.
fietd COunty at its regular meeting
. - place in the Board Room of Ches-
,. terfjeld County, Virginia, will con-
sider the conveyance of a variable
. width right of way containing
1 0.621 acres, ~Iong CI8ypoint Road
, and BaHey Bridge Road, to the Vir - l
~jnra Dep ratmen t of T r ansp<? rta. r
, tron, located in Matoaca Olstrrct, (
r Chesterfield County. designated"'!
as a porUon of County tax map 63! .
-9(1) parcel 15. ~ l
A more particular descrlpUon ofl
the parcel to be conveyed and fur-
the r tmo rma !ton is on Ii I e tn the of - :
fice of the Property Management
S~p~ryjsor in ChesterfIeld County,
VtrQlnla and may be examined by
. , aU Interested parties between the .
. , hours of 9;00 a.m. and 5:00 p,m.
, Monday through Friday. t
. r..~.. ."" ~:......... ~ .. .. i:l"'r'l!..
23832
DESCRIPTION
26 i:::
16'3.52
CHARGES
!LINES RUNS
CREDITS
TOTAL
INCHES AMOUNT
Richmond Newspapers~ Inc.
I='ub i i sher elf;
I .
THE RICHMOND TIMES-DISPATCH
THE! RICHMO~D NEWS LEADER
!' '
This is to certify tha~ the attached LEGAL NOTI
was publishe~ by Ri~hMond Newspapers, Inc., ~n the C
of Richmond, i State bf Virg~nia, on the follo~ing
~r i r(l~s-D i sp~t eh
~ ;
News Leade~"\
()2/26/92
()3 / ()41 '32
The first
!
\. I
ins~rtion ~eing giv~n....
i
()2J26/92
)
f
, .
Sworn to andlsubscrlbed before
this
Nc.t ary
State of Vir~inia
City elf R i Ch~llt:'rld
My commission expir~s
~
My Commlssi on txpfres Jtm~ ~n _ 1 ~~A
i
WHEN REMITTING P~EASE REFER TO YOUR
! ..
CUSTOMER # akOB06 I
'U@U'1J:fl, ~ c:::J I 169. 52
~ ".. .. .~
.. i I"~ ".... .~. r-... ........ ".... r-l"'... ~ ~
. r~ ., _ ......... I ~ ~i'./ iJ#. )
'.jI ~-""~.I~"'''''''''''''~~
:~..'~::'~-:,~' :-;/: .. ~J~: ~::~:_'::' ::':... .:.~
~~. i~!:j"~. :.~TG ~~~~i}~' ~~=~;~:,'
0/0 CASH DISCOUNT IF PAID ON
OR BEFORE 15th OF THE SUCCEEDING MONTH.
NO DISCOUNT ALLOWED THEREAFTER.
. i
" . ..,.
I .' 01
'~~.'"
e CHES'TERFIELDCOUNTI'
P.O. Box 40
CH ESTERFI ELD, VI RG IN IA 23832-0040
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
HARRY G. DANIEL. CHAIRMAN
DALE DISTRICT
ARTHUR S. WARREN1 VICE CHAIRMAN
CLOVER HIll OJSTAJCT
J. L MCHALEt IU
BERMUDA DISTRICT
WHALEY M. COLBERT
MATOACA orSTRrCT
EDWARD B. BARBER
MIDLOTHIAN DISTRICT
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Richmond News Leader
~
rf!
po ..,
- ~-'
,
II
;:
,,"
~:
..~:
. ...
FROM:
Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors
'l.
. ~.-
DATE :
February 14, 1992
SUBJECT :
/" : ~ ~ ... ._~;~. .. ;.. ..
Meetings and Coming~"'Everits' '\
," ~ . /' ... ,-:
/~ I ./"/ -
. t I
1\ \.,
. '\ . j .
One (1) time, Wednesd~y," -'Fe_b_ruary 26, 1992
\ · . :c;~-- \ . .
.... " .. ......-~~~../
'/'
,
...
Please confirm by calling the Clerk to the.Board
of supervisors Office at 748-1200. Also, please
fax me a computer printou~of the ad--Fax number
748-3032. ~ 0
,
PLEASE SEND TEAR SHEET WITH BILL.
. ,
~ .
...
J~ALJ;J., 7n. 'fJ.cta-.
Theresa M. pitts I
Clerk to the Board of Supervisors (I~~erim)
jb
Attachment
LANE B. RAMSEY
co U NTY A DM I N I STRA TOR
I
i
'l ~
, ,
I
", I}
~'!I'
- L
....~
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
HARRY G. DANJEL. CHAIRMAN
DALE DISTRJCT <
ARTHUR S. WARREN1 VICE CHAIRMAN
CLOVER HILL DISTRICT
J. L Me HALE. III
BERMUDA OJSrn,CT
WHALEY M. COLBERT
MA TOACA DISTRICT
EDWARD B. BARBER
'-AIDLOTHrAN DISTRICT
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT :
e CHESTERFIELD COUNT!'
P.o. Box 40
CH ESTER FI ELD, VI RG IN IA 23832-0040
MEMORANDUM
Progress Index
Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors
February 14, 1992
Meetings and Coming Events
One (1) time, Wednesday, February 26, 1992
Please confirm by calling the Clerk to the Board
of Supervisors Office at 748-1200. Also, please
fax me a computer printout of the ad--Fax number
748-3032.
PLEASE SEND TEAR SHEET WITH BILL.
J~?n. :I'~
Theresa M. pitts
Clerk to the Board of Supervisors (Interim)
jb
Attachment
LANE B. RAMSEY
cou NTY ADM IN ISTRA TO R
, J
..'
~ ....
It
e
TAKE NOTICE
Take notice that the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield
County, Virginia, at a regular meeting on March 11, 1992 at 7:00
p.m. in the County Public Meeting Room at Chesterfield
Courthouse, Chesterfield, Virginia, will hold a public hearing to
consider the conveyance of the following leases of real property
in the Chesterfield parks system for operation of food
concessions by athletic associations:
Real Property (Facilities)
Current Lease Holder
Bensley Concession Building
Bensley Athletic Assoc.
Chalkley Athletic Complex
Chalkley Athletic Assoc.'
Rockwood Park
Chesterfield Baseball
. Cl.ubs', Inc.-
Bird Athletic Complex
Chesterfield Girls
Softball
Point of Rocks
Enon Athletic Assoc.
Ettrick Park
Ettrick Youth Sports
Assoc.
Harrowgate Park
Harrowgate Athletic
Assoc.
Robious Athletic Complex
Huguenot Little League
Matoaca Park
Matoaca Athletic Assoc.
Iron Bridge Park
Chesterfield Baseball
Clubs, Inc.
Goyne Park
Chester Sports Boosters
Copies of the leases are on file in the County Administrator's
Office, Room 505, 9901 Lori Road, Chesterfield, Virginia, and may
be examined by all interested persons between the hours of 8:30
a.m. to 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday.
Ric!hzmond! e
Newspapers, i1J1lfo
An Affiliate of Media General
e
P.o. BOX C-32333
RICHMOND T VIRGI NIA 23293-0001
804-649-6000
COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
ATTN: JOAN DOLEZAL
1=). o. BOX 4()
CHESTERFIELD VA
DATE
CODE
23832
DESCRIPTION
CRED ITS
TOTAL
INCHES AMOUNT
CHARGES
LINES RUNS
(12/26/
B
LEGAL NOTICE
CONSIDER CONVEYANCE
FOLLOWING LEASES
\ T8k~ ~o~~~g~il;ard Of~. :
pervlsors of Chesterfield County, .
Vi rgl nia. at a regular meeti':'Q on
March 11 1992 at 7:00 p.m. .n the .
. County PUbUc Meeth1g Room at
Chesterfield Courthouse. Chester..
field. vlrgrnfa, wW hold a public
hearing to consider the
cooveyance of the toUowin~ ~aases
of rear property in the C hes tarfle'd
parks system for operation of
food concess~on$ by ath'etlc
assodatlons: ,
Ben%ia~~m~~ ~ CAJr- .
rent Lease Holder: Bensley A th!et-
Ie Assoc.
Chalkley Athletic Complex A Cur-
rent Lease Hotder: Chalkley Athlet-
~~~ Park . Current Lease :
Holder: Chesterfield BassbaU
Clubs, ~nc. . .
Bird Athletk: Complex . Current
Lease Hotder: Chesteriield Gir1s
SoftbaU
Po~nt of Rocks - Current Lease
Ho1der: Enon Athletic Assoc.
Ettrtck Park - Current Lease
Holder: Ettrlck Youth Sports
Assoc. .
Harrowgate Park 4 Current lease
Ho'der~ Harrowgate Athletic
Assoc. . .
Rob~ous Athletic ComPlex.. Cur- .
rent Lease HOlder: Huguenot Litt1e
League '
Matoaca Park - Current Lease".
He'd.r: Matoaca Athletic Assoc.
lton BrldQl!! Park. Current lease
Holder: Chesterfleld BQSobaU
ClubS. Inc, '
G9)'n8 Park - Current tease
. Holder: Cheater Sports Boosters '.
'Coples of the teaaes are on ilia ~n .
the COlI ntv Admintstrator's Office, [.
Room 505, 9901 Lori Road. Ches.
18rf~eld. V~rginia. and may be
examined by aU interested per-
sons be1Yleen the hours 01 8~30
8.m. to 5:00 p.m.. M~mday
. ..thro~h ~!id~. I ........ .~
54
1
1 76. (>4
Ric~mond N,wspapers, Inc.
J:' u b ~ ish e.,.... CI f
THE RICHMON~ TIMES-DISPATCH
THE. RICHMOND NEWS L~RDER
. ,
This is ~o cert~fy tha~ the att~ched LEGAL NOT!
was published by Ri~hmond Newspaper~, Inc., ~n the C
of Richmond, State pf Virg~nia, on ihe fol1o~ing
~ ~
T i rnes-D i spa t ch
News Leade~
()2/2~/92
The first insertion bSing giY~n.... 02126/92
I
nl t his ar'dF~Db2c:r ~W berClre
,~~ 7 -~u$&V
, ~,tary Public
State of Vir~inia' !
City of Rich~ond
M .. l .
Y commlsSlOr explr~s
WHEN REMITTING P~EASE REFER TO'YOUR CUSTOMER # 2~0806
,
~ .. ',,:-..i' Jv.. /
, , ,~ ,. - ./ ' ~..t . ,
~. ~.- ~/~':.'--I'?i~ ,'>/:~:~'r::>: ~~
1i@ij'm @J!l3 c::> I 176. 04
- j~~.' ::' :~:?G ~ ~/~ ;~I~~ ~~=,'~ ~~~.:
0/0 CASH DISCOUNT IF PAtD ON
OR BEFORE 15th OF THE SUCCEEDING MONTH.
NO DISCOUNT ALLOWED THEREAFTER.
e
e
,... ~
.-'BUndi~;:kJ~gt~;;Athl'e-' :\
~}i~l<As~9.c~;; .;c;.~'al k Ie y \
~ AthletIc - Complex-
'Chat kley~;.~\ Athletic-' 1 As"':. . .
. see: ; ,:F. Roc k wo_cd' -- Park -'.' i
Ch'es ('erfi.e ld,"j B a.seba! 1. _' j
Clubs'~.~."lnc~;. Bird Athletic : ~
Ccunplex -Chesterfie ld 'I
Girls ~.,SoftDall f.' point of j
Rocks':' Enon' Athletic . As- ~ ; II
.soC~; ,.'.Ettrick.. P_a~~-Ettrick
.,Y outh"'. Sports.. Assoc.;
'H ar r,Q w g a [e ,-P ark.:,",
Harrawgate Athletic., As- .
. SQC~: :., . Robious Athletic,.:
Complex-Hugu~not . Littl~\ I
;'.Le.ague;-. Matoaca . Park-.
~. Matouca 'Athletic Ass.oc~; ~
~) ro~p.t . ~,~i_d ge '.~-~~rk~- '.
Chesterfleld,~ Baseball'.
:~ Cl utis, Inc. ;., Goyne. ~ Park:= I
'~,. Ch~~t~r. ,~~~. , B~st~rs; .! ; - ~ t
'. ~ Copies of the, lease.s ~ are' ..i
_ .. - -------:-~~ .. on. file'" in~.'" the;-:: County ;, ~t
.,' . TAKE NOTICE . Administrator' s ..~ O"ffice;.' t
. .; :;:. .?...1~ .. ,..... .:. .t~.' Room~" 50S.; ~'990'L~-:~Lon .. .',
Take nCitice. that ,the . Road~' ~. Chesterfield~. 'Vir- ...
Board, of Superviso~s !-'f .' ..ginia,\~L and may; be'.~ exa~ '.-
Chesterfield" County~ Vlr-. mined. by. all --interested
$inia., ~t 'a regular meet- ~ pers~n,s b~twe,en ~he, -
l n g.~' 0 n ~ Marc h: 1 1 ~ -:. hourst l~(~~:.:S:~3~ a-:m. to__
1992 at 7:00 AP.m. In ~h~ '. ~ 5; OO\l :p r~... ;.~.~ ~.on day
County - P_ubhc. . Mee~lng through_>fn~ay ~..' ..~. . -
Room. ~ at~ -.Chesterfl e Id ~ .', l~, :! ~':.~~':"':...i. ,~~.""4,~'1 _.. .
Courthouse. Chesterfield... n2l26/9:2. ;~..: ~.:. ;'; '~~~:::.', :.
Vir in i a ~ will h old a. r '. ,.,- , .~ ..~. .' ~
pubfic, hearing to con-' !
sider ~ the conveyance of 0- ~
the .:following leases of -J
real~' property in the i
.~:. ~ - Chesterfi~ ld par ~s s Y s- I
~~~ tem~. for: oper.atton of 1
food concessions by ath- ~
letic 'associations: ~: I
Real Property"".
(Facilities); .
, Current Lease
,H5)~d~r ., .
Bensley Concession
r-
.j
. -~.;::'--
'-.D
rv
-.,..
:;
:;0
1
CT\
,-..
... ~
c~
-
'.~~
-..- ("l.
c-, rn.
c --::
rn 4:_
~c.~
~
=
r
C)
I ".... ..
.i
. .t ~;
,1ri~ARD OF SUPERVISORS
HARRY G. DANIE~ CHAIRMAN
DALE DISTRtCT
ARTHUR S. WARREN. VICE CHAIRMAN
CLOVER Hill O'STRJCT
J. L MCHALE, 111
BERMUDA DISTRICT
WHALEY M. COLBERT
MA TOACA DISTRICT
EDWARD B. BARBER
M~DLOTHJAN DISTRICT
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT :
e CHESTERFIELD COUNTft
P.o. Box 40
CH ESTER FI ELD, VI RG IN IA 23832-0040
MEMORAHDUlI
Richmond News Leader
Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors
February 14, 1992
Meetings and Coming Events
One (1) time, Wednesday, February 26, 1992
One (1) time, Wednesday, March 4, 1992
Please confirm by calling the Clerk to the Board
of Supervisors Office at 748-1200. Also, please
fax me a computer printout of the ad--Fax number
748-3032.
PLEASE SEND TEAR SHEET WITH BILL.
JI ~.AI~ ~ in. '--P.
Theresa M. pitts
Clerk to the Board of supervisors (Interim)
jb
Attachment
LAN E B. RAMSEY
cou N TV ADM I N I STRA TO R
. ~... .
\ .,~
./ "BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
HARRY G. DANIEl. CHArRMAN
DALE OtSTRICT
ARTHUR S. WARREN, VICE CHAIRMAN
CLOVER HJLl DISTRICT
J. L MCHALE, III
BERMUDA DISTRICT
WHALEY M. COLBERT
MATOACA DJSTRJCT
EDWARD Bt BARBER
M~DLOTHIAN DISTRICT
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT :
e CHESTERFIELD COUNT~
P.o. Box 40
CH ESTERFI ELD, VI RG IN IA 23832-0040
MEMORANDUM
Progress Index
Chesterfield County Board of supervisors
February 14, 1992
Meetings and coming Events
One (1) timei Wednesday, February 26, 1992
One (1) time, Wednesday, March 4, 1992
Please confirm by calling the Clerk to the Board
of Supervisors Office at 748-1200. Also, please
fax me a computer printout of the ad--Fax number
748-3032.
PLEASE SEND TEAR SHEET WITH BILL.
J~ 7r}. ~du;
Theresa M. pitts
Clerk to the Board of Supervisors (Interim)
jb
Attachment
LANE B. RAMSEY
COU NTY A OM I N I STRA TOR
. \.....~:...
e
e
~ '
.. I
TAKE NOTICE
Take notice that the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield
County, Virginia, at a regular meeting on March 11, 1992 at 7:00
p.m. in the County Public Meeting Room at -Chesterfield
Courthouse, Chesterfield, Virginia, will hold a public.hearing to
consider an ordinance to amend the Code of the County of
Chesterfield, 1978, as amended, by amending and reenacting
Sectiong 21-67.33.1 ,and 21.1-255.4 relating 'generally to
development standards in village districts.
Copies of the ordinance are on file in the County Administrator's
Office, Room 504, 9901 Lori Road, Chesterfield, Virginia, and may
be examined by all interested persons between the hours of 8:30
a.m. to 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday.
/'_.
. I