The URL can be used to link to this page

08-22-2007 Packet .~~. ~ . -. ; ~~~ CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 2 Meeting Date: August 22,2007 Item Number: 2.A. Subiect: County Administrator's Comments County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: (lJ (j Board Action Reauested: No action required Summary of Information: Virginia was host to the 72nd Annual Conference and Exposition of the National Association of Counties (NACo) held July 13-17, 2007 at the Richmond Convention Center. This year's conference coincided with the 400th Anniversary of the English Settlement at Jamestown. More than 3,500 local government officials from across the country attended the conference. Over 400 volunteers from Chesterfield County and other localities in the region contributed to the success of the conference. Mr. Stegmaier will personally thank the volunteers for representing the Commonwealth of Virginia and share with the volunteers an email received from James D. Campbell, Executive Director, of the Virginia Association of Counties (see attached) . Preparer: Paul W. Mauaer Title: Fire Chief Attachments: . Yes DNO # 000001 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 2 of 2 Thank you. . .Thank you. . . Thank you! You upurple shirted people greeters" were absolutely terrific !!!! Your friendly smiles, your warm welcomes, your helpful attitudes were the talk of the conference. From my experience with more than 20 NACO conferences, I have never heard such raving compliments about the hospitality and friendliness of the host community. Thanks to you, the greater Richmond Region.... and Virginia, "raised the bar" and set a new standard for this national conference. On behalf of the Virginia Association of Counties, thank you for making the 2007 NACo Conference a tremendous success. Jim James D. Campbell Executive Director Virginia Association of Counties 1001 E Broad St Suite LL20 Richmond,VA 23219 jcampbell@vaco.org 000002 =- , -- ....... - --- . CIa II, . ,. ~........ ~ ~u t;r~ ~~'-^Y ~ .- ~ 'I- '\ M.... -- ~ -j; ~ L.... ~ ~ ,""I ~ Ii ' L.: .. :.r? - ijf w ~ ~ ~~ . .~i~ I J ;::~Ifj.--l! 1 ~1/1 mIlt'- .: ~ ~ 11:....... J ~ ~ ~~:...I to. .. .. ~"!'I~ ~- la ~ I II :~ I ~ '~:..G. :;-.1, . .. r 1.:1' ~ ~ ..-:. :l1l:I II ~ ~ Ir,,:a." .......r. ~j ~ .~.. , "fN..":O"~ '~.i ~' .. ~ i :=..::-.:." ... 'i;I' r:'=!:. ..... ~. 1 ~ ..1 ......fr:- :a.....f~. ~ iE ,'" .... u.., _ -= ~ :II. f!. ~~ ...: 'L' L' '!:" =~ ~ - ... · '1.....1., ~ ._v P'YZ~ $. .r-:'.I4*'~ ~..... .-..;.;'~ . ~ . ~.~, .. ..,; d ..... .. ll. · 'u y [I'j:-:i'lll CT....- ~... _ . fWiI... :"'..'.:" ;:-: '. 'f.... ~ "i'\.':- ~. ~ · ~ ' ... "- ~ ^' 'Iil"i ;.. ~. .~~.... ~ '-'W:' ~ . ~ ..:-- ... .-. -!: .-...j - ~ .'. :., ~ .:0- ~ , ~ ~ W · ,t:: ~..~: L.....:r&r ~ ~ 'I: _ to . ...... ....... __----1-4"". .... .... _ _ ~ ............ . · .!' .I.w.:." · a.:- 'I _ I .... ..~......~ . ... ,~. ... ~~~ ~~~t~, .' - ~a.-..~- - ~.I.:. .- - ~ i: I I. , .. :. . 1 ...... .. II.~"" ... .-.-: 111". ~:=: . ~~ ~ ~ ..~ ~~ 1 1 ~ ~ ~ .. ,. - ;-: iiI[.'II :.J--=-- ~ . -.=-- ~, ~ t.. ~: ~~:i . " ...' II'"_~.. .."J 1:. ~, ~ ....... . . ijI~ ,~ ..... - ~ .,w !tw! ~.'--:-:'i: jlM 1 :-... I~'I ... ~M""~" III ~-_ ...,~. .~~ ~ ~J ~...W: -..1 ~~ t.: ~1 · jI.:"IiT.iI .It"!,.. r: 1 ~.. ~ · I .,/ L ":' ~...., ''=-... ~ ~~ jI.~~ ~~~ 1 ..... I- ~ a~ ~..... ~ .. --.&." . Llfj- -- -. -~ Ii I r, ,- ::I"'M-=:I ---- ... T. ...... .=...; ... .i "TWII '-~r. ~ , . ~ ~ ~- ~~ tj I~ ~ iJ :-: ~ ~, ~ !i ~ " ~ :I,. :7t; I~ II .. .,. '! ~ e:.!III Ii . ~ ~. ~r: -- ~ I . __..... ~ ,v; I II . !~ 'I :J ,."'III . ~ ... ~ ~ -: ,.... ;:\ ~ :-. . L- ... :. ....... ~r, .I~' I ~ .1.(, ~ ~ ". ~ ~ . I · ~~.- · :....~j I ~Irrt.. ~ IJ~~~~~ )~ ~4(L: [ 1 k-~~~ , ;IIr).kt':-='~ · l""1li -- r!:.... ~ I..I~" ~ J!!t if.:..:.-:: -'i. ~~ . - ~.; . .....:" ": : :1"1 .... ~ · = · · ~ · ."-t.v. or · i ~ .... ::.... 'II; =-- , - .dII .: I. .1:'iII"Ii.~. . .-..~ .~~ . =---.,', ~iJ-.lTJ ,/' ::.... L " ~ .-t: -\: g ~'r) ~ I..... ...o"'r'" ~ w _ ~~ ........""!-. ~;;-. ....:.-- 1".:i12i...-:z'Jl": iJ. ~ ~ ~~: ;;.. ..~. .:.. ~ ~ ~.:~ I: '-:"1! ..~~. ~ r~ r" """"";Iof,. ~ .. II: ~ ~~ ~..~t~~ \r.i -=-::.. ~ ~ ~ ":':. ;.-..... ~ ~ ) l~ ~r:)I~""" rIa- -- ".... ,I ~ ........-: - .~ I" : I&f& ,.:~W II ~ ~",~ e:-: IL _,~ ~ .I; P:iI ~ ~ r" ~ - p ~ ~~. . I-r:s. ~~ ~ ___.}. I L.l~ ~ ItI ~''::p''I ~ :-1'ij ~ t ~.,tI ~ · L~I~ ..;- , ~ :-DII' .. __ ---=--~ ~.... ~ . II ~~ I "i.tl"j I · 1 ~ .... ::aJ -. Ill.. -L"I :::..... :- I : .. .~ ~~.- ..~~~~ ,1~ ~~'~"'!f ~""'I ....... "I . .. I ~ ~:!: ~.. ...... ... '-"'I~ ~ r_":;;.I ~"..J l :!' ~ ;r. ~I':-: .. DI ru f !II . ~ nI . 'rtt .r) ill -.., w ~ ~ :JI:l I ~.. rl ~ [ ~. ~ I .. '-- I::II'~ r~. III: c.~=::. "9 'I. i"~1 I...'~.. &-iI:1 ~;; .!II. io( I. !~~-= ~~~~, ~=---~r - 6 =-- .1'. ~ "Zri ";-.~; i }'!; ~. 1-- .I~ _~ . ::-~:. .. :..-" .~ . ~~~ . IJ . ...L. ..: ~ .., ~.q (1 ~:1.1. ~.~Li. ,I ~. _~ Ir~..... ~--: ~~ .NI:I .., s::: CD E ftS Q. CD ~ Q) (,,) ::J '- 1:: = ~ 1:: 0 en Q) 0 LL. Q) en E c "E E 0 rJ) Q) Q) Q) ti Q) ->, :; Q) en rn tJ) 0) 0) U) E Q) CL'I Q) .ex: CO CL'I c: c: CO (.) 0 tJ) c: a. Q) '- 0 c .~ .~ CL'I '- ro tJ) Cl B CO ro Q) ro E 2 c: co ~ :2: Q) Q) - c ~ (f) en en Cl <( ~ Cl m ~ ~ w c: c :2; (i) >, E 03 U'J (ij (ij .~ "i:: C "i:: Q) ro c: :::J :g Cl E C') ::J E '0 '- '0 ro c: Q) :c (.) ~ "'0 Q) :l "'0 (.) 0 .0 0 CL'I m .: ::J Q) ::J rn ::J '- 0 0 :l Q) :5 en ::J en c::: c:: LL. D.. en m ~ m u: U CJ CJ U) CD ~ 0 a. CI) CI) fh CI) Cf) rn CI) CI) rn rn U'J U'J U'J UJ t/J U'J tJ) E CD CD Q) CD Q) Q) Q) ~ ~ ~ Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) >- >- >- >- >- >- >- >- >- >- >- >- >- >- b b ~ ~ >. ~ >. >. >. >. >. ~ >, >. ~ >. >. r::::: c: c: r::::: C c: C C C C C c: "E C c C C ::J :l :J ::J :J :J ::J :J :J ::J ::J :::J ::J :J ::J ::J :::J - 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ca <-> <-> CJ <-> CJ CJ <-> 0 0 CJ CJ CJ 0 CJ U 0 U CJ "'C "'0 "'0 "'C "'C "'C "'C "'C :2 "'C "'C "'0 "'0 "'0 "'0 "'0 ""0 0 Cii Q) Q) Cii Q) Q) Cii CD Q) Q.i Q.i Cii Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) 'E 'E 'E 'E 'E 'E 'E 'E if: 'E 'E 'E 'E 'E 'E 'E 'E CD Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) (],) Q) Q) Q) CJ.) Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) .... .... (;) en (;) (;i .... +'" +'" 1;) (;) (;) en U) U) en Cii CI) tJ'J rJ'J rJ'J rJ'J Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) CJ.) Q) Q) ..r::::: ..r::::: L:. ..c ..c L:. ...c ...c ..c .r:. ..c ..c ...c ...c .r:. .r:. ..c 0 0 U <-> U U <-> () <-> 0 0 () 0 CJ CJ 0 0 :> :> :> :> > ~ 0 :> 0 ~ > ~ 0 :> > > > :> 0 ~ :> 0 0) 0 0 > 0 0 > "'C Cl 0 ~ "'0 ~ C) 0 0 > > C) 0) 0 (i) "'0 "'0 ~ CD "'0 ~ ~ 0 0 "'0 Q) Q; "'0 Q.i "'0 "'0 0) "'0 "'C ~ If CD "'C CD "E Q) "'0 "'0 C) Q) CD 'E t CD 'E co CD co "'0 fti "'C (1) 'E 'E Q) t 'E "'0 'E 'E co (j) Q) Q) 'E 1;) Q) 'E t Q) w E Q) (j) (j) Q) 1;) Q) CL'I CL'I Q) If: Q) +'" Q) 1i) Q) en Q) Q) 'E 'E 1;) 1;) J::. rJ) Q) CJ.) U; ...c Q) en U; (;) Q) Q) I@ Q) .r:. J::. Q) 0 ..c C1) (1) Q) (;j OJ OJ Q) U) ..c 0 0 Q) ...c @ 0 J:: ...c: .r:. f1) en ..c ..c Q) (,,) @) @) ..c 0 @) @ (,,) 0 .r:. CL'I CL'I (.) (,,) .r:. "C @ (.) ~ rh @) @ 0 ...c J:: @) @ (.) '- ~ E @) ..0 0 @) (.) (,,) OJ "~ c: (.) LL ~ '- '- @) E c: E :e c: 0 rJ) '- E E @) c c: 0 ~ 0 0 tJ'J Q) ~ :i2 0 ..0 ~ C'G tJ'J C Q) Q) ..... fh ~ E Cl "'0 E :: c c: :i2 '2: a:s tn c r.J) a. ..0 .2 ca Q,) c (ij c: .r:. .J::. "'0 c: N ::J 0 ";t E '- "- co Q) 0 0 ~ 0 '- '0 m C) " .c: .r:. ...c .r:. .2. --, .2. ...:s::: ~ ~ ~ .2 '- '- OJ -, E '- ~ c: ... c: E """") >. ~ c c: Q) :i:: CD 0 ~ c 0 0 '2 ...:s::: a. CD n:s ~ UJ ~ '- "'C C Q) UJ tn tJ) C n:s E c ..0 .2 C> 0 c 0 I "'C C C c: ~ N Q) :::J a C) ro E "- .r:. ..c :.s2 0 Q) c: rJ) :J C) co I ..c co 0 0 "'C --; ~ (/'J .~ -I 0 '- ~ '- 10 3: ....., --, ::J ::J 0 C co ro m Q) ~ Q) Q) Q.i >. "- " E I m 0 Q) >. -, (/'J .....J -I co co Q) I 'c U; '0 m m ..0 E c ~ Q) >. e c ..c ~ >, Q) ..c rn "- J:: ...:s::: Co ~ c 'C ~ .2 c >. 0 0 co Q) 0 ~ OJ 0 .r:. co m 0 ctS cu c::: co 0 -, :2: :2: ....., CJ () 0 LL. 2 :2: I- U. 0:: C") 1:: c '0' o .ex: 6- (/) -I ~ U U. LL o >- """ ~(/)g =:>D::N o w - Owr--- t-~ LLZ' Q::>M ....JT""" 20>- O>....J - :J I- --, ~ U o en (/) <( ....J <C Z o i= .ex: 2 w ~ ...J :- w .., > """ o o ~ T""" ""'- ro 000005 .,~ .. ~ .. ~ ," !,.~ rA .. .~ !II ~ .. '...&.I " .r. ~ -=- ~~ ~ ~ ., ..... ~ .1 ... ...... 0': AI--......- - ~ "I · ~ .A~ .. ....... . " ...... .. --- .- I P' .. g~ r I:i i ... I .. ~ ,. ... :. ... r- ........i:. :..J . ~ ,la, e; I. ...~ ~ 5Ii ~ ~. .\~t~ ~~ , ;:&.ib.:JI =' ~ ~ "-~~ " J f;:.1 1 .1iI ~ :!II : -i} ,~fi' ... 1 .111"- , ~ fA I ~ r. ...,.... -.. ...it...,: .: _ , ... .. ~ ,:1... ~~. .......... ... -... ... - ..... .. ~ .., .......... ~ ~ -. .Y....-- -........ .1 ....,...... ... .:r:.~ .. . .- · -S'.:,.I 6"~... r ... ... -"-'--"- ..... '... ~ -:,..; ., .. :...~:. ..... I.~ -= ~.1fP ~ ...... _ .. ~ I)}I: . .... · I" .......,...,... _ _ _ · _ ....... i... ~ - 11M _ . "\ -.. I _ ..~ I ~ . . - --:J. --. ~~ ... : I ~I .. ~ :.:..-: . ,.. :If , I .. ~i ~ I ~ ~ I~ ~ '" ~ ~~ ~ rJ . I ; ) ~ ~ - ~ ~~. ~ ~~ ." 1I:iI I-~ i~ ~~) ~ :\~ ~ ..;~=- · I LI:'- =- I j If: I .. ~ ~~ J :- ' - I..... . ' ~ rj'. ~._l" t=:-.. ~~~rj ;~~ iii !J~ II~ ~rr.... ~ 1:"1 ~\rr( I e ~ ~. ~~."Ii. ~ --'~:".. ,., :111: ~~ ?;m ~ 'i.=-.. :;.,. ir ~: - ~ ":" w-: ~....~: I .:-; ~... .... .. :~-.. ~ .~ M~....-: I.' ~':1'''' ~ - J' 'b:-S t; pi . ~~-.- - .. -.. I · .. . V ~)' '- -:;:"P ....... ::":. -. ...: 1,.___:. ":t. 11.1" : .=-. '1;-' ~ r ~~A. ~~~~ . ~~ ~~N~ '-'" ~IJ ~. -.~ .. ":4' Ii! i: I:: ~ a II"': '" ~~ ::i~ ....... - E.,. ~ ...- .....~ =E .... . ..... gr ... .. =- ~ ~. f 'I ill I ,. ~ i: VIlli ~.,-....... I II n, I ~ . .:. . I ..... ..~ ......1 :-..: .: ~ ~. .~"'I'~ -:-- - ~I ~-~''r-~ '!f :0:-...1. JI ~~~ =.- JI ., ~I~~ .... ~~ .~~~~ ~ - "'~caa:r --= · · ->= r ... c: CD E 1::= CG c. CD C "'C L- eo ~ c:: 0 m Ow 0 "'- ~ tJ) CI) Q) o~ L- tJ) 0 tJ) c:: en r./) CI) o~ Q) ::> :5 Q) 0 0 0 "~ Q) "2: "'0 E "~ o~ U) "ii L- "'0 Q) ~ Q) 'E ~ <{ Q) en en ([) ::::I r./) >. r./) "E (f) Ci :.c ro en tJ) ~ c ~ ::::I CO "0 CO "0 ([) CO ::J 0 00 ~ o~ Q) <.J 0 0 .s:::. L- :5 0 :5 0 0 CJ) u: c (f) t) l- t) <: (f) ", r./) r./) tJ) 0 tJ'J rn en U'J tJ) tJ) Q) QJ Q) CD ~ Q) CD ([) Q) Q) CD >- >- >- >- >- >- >- >- >- >- ~ ~ ~ ~ >. >. ~ Z' ~ ~ >, C C C c: C "E "E c "E c: "E ::J ::J ::J ::J ::J ::J ::J ::J ::I ::::I ::::I 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 () 0 U U U U U () U U "'0 "'C "'C "'0 "'0 "'C "'C "'C "'C "'C "'0 Q) Qj Qi Q) Q) (i) Qi "ii (i) Q) W 1: 1: 1: 'E 'E if 'E t if 'E 'E Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) OJ Q) en (j) en 1i) U; en 1i) (;) (;) (;) -+-' r./) Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) .s::. .s::. .s::. ..c .s:::. ..c ..c ..J:: ..c ..c ..c: 0 () 0 0 U U U U U U U > > > 0 E :> 0 Ol > 0 ~ > CD 0 > > & 0 en 0 c:: "'C > ~ 0 0 ~ "'0 C!> m 0 OJ C) "'C "'C "ii "'C ~ 'E q> (3 "'0 "'C (i) (i) 1: ca ro m "'C W 'E Q) "'C Qj if: Q) 0 Q) Q) @) 'E 'E Q) en 'E E en 1: Q) 1;) if r./) ~ Q) 1i) Q) Q) 0 Q) Q) Q) -+-' a> Ci) 0 ..c Q) =c U'J -+-' r./) Q) ..J:: @) 0 U; Q) U'J Q) ..c: ..c 0 Q) @) C Q) ...c 0 @ ..c Q) eo ..c ...c 0 0 @ Q) 0 @) 0 "m c. .J:: 0 @ 0 ~ "S;:: @ c: 0 r./) ~ ~ ;" <<I ~ ro @ Q) ro Q) CD :0 t :J ..c ~ :E :E r./) E Q) oN C) F ..c ca E ~ 0 ::J "ii E "2> "~ C) .c E ~ 0 C) ro res ~ L- Oi:: :J ca .a c: > S: a.. S: S: ~ N -+-' ..c ~ c: C) "- m "i:: :c Q) ..c c S Q) E ~ C) 0 tJ) - 0 Q) :J .!!l. .!!l. :E :E ....-... ro CD Q) ::J '- I- "w ca G3 ~ C) C) ~ ..c E I- .::.:: > "i:: 'C :::J <<I tJ) ::> ns S ns S $ E >- E c: ca :g (i) co E oN Q) Q) ~ c:: N c g. E '0 Q) ca 0 0 1U c: ca r...... >. 0 ..c en 0 ca c: ~ ~ m 0 """") I- Z CL """") a.. <t: ~ ....., <.0 0' () <{ ~ en ...J ~ U u.. LL o ~ I'"- zwg ~~N o W - UW"" I--r- u..Z' O::>M ...JT""" zO>- O>.....J - ::> I- ...., ~ o o en en <: .....J <: Z o i= <C z CD CD >. o Q. E w ~ c; u o ...J .; E w "- CD CD ... C ::J "0 > 000008 t- o o ~ T""" ....... IX) .~ u CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Meeting Date: August 22,2007 Item Number: 2.B. Subiect: County Administrator'S Comments County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Q) () Board Action Reauested: Summary of Information: A presentation will be given by staff regarding the drought conditions in Chesterfield County. Preparer: Lisa Elko Title: Clerk to the Board Attachments: DYes .NO # 000009 .~\ Q.~ ~ II ~ -. - -- " . ;~~~7# CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Meeting Date: August 22, 2007 Item Number: 5..A. ~ Subiect: Resolution Recognizing Mr. Lane B. Ramsey, County Administrator, Upon His Retirement County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: ~ Board Action Reauested: Adoption of attached resolution. Summary of Information: The Board of Supervisors will recognize Mr. Lane Ramsey, County Administrator, Upon His Retirement. Mr. Ramsey served the ci tizens of Chesterfield County for 35 years. He began work with the county as an accountant in 1972 and rose through the ranks, serving as assistant director of accounting, budget director, budget and accounting director, and assistant county administrator before being appointed as county administrator. His contributions to the citizens of Chesterfield County are many and the impact of his work will be felt for many years to come. Preparer: Marilvn Cole Title: Assistant County Administrator Attachments: . Yes DNO I # 000010 I RECOGNIZING MR. LANE B. RAMSEY UPON HIS RETIREMENT WHEREAS, Mr. Lane B. Ramsey was first employed by Chesterfield accountant in January 1972 after having served honorably in the UaS. Army, tours of duty in vietnam; and County as an including two WHEREAS, Mr. Ramsey was appointed as Assistant Director of Accounting in March 1974; three years later, he was promoted to Director of Budget; became director of Budget and Accounting when the two departments were consolidated in May 1981; and was reclassified as Assistant County Administrator for Budget and Staffing in January 1987; and WHEREAS, in April 1987, Mra Ramsey was appointed as acting County Administrator by the Board of Supervisors; and in September 1987, when Chesterfield County had a population of 181,500, Lane B. Ramsey was appointed as County Administrator, and held that position until August 13, 2007; and WHEREAS, during his 20 years as County Administrator, Mr. Ramsey has successfully worked with many Board of Supervisors members, and with wisdom and dedication, has managed the day-to-day operations of a vibrant, growing county that now is home to 306,000 residents, and has overseen an extensive list of award-winning county government services and programs; and WHEREAS, under his direction, Chesterfield County has earned a national reputation as a desirable, well-managed, diverse, innovative locality that is a leader among local governments in America; and WHEREAS, Mr. Ramsey's leadership has been instrumental in building a financial system that is one of the finest in the country, resulting in Chesterfield County's attainment and retention of AAA bond ratings from Standard and Poor's, Fitch and Moody's, the nation's three foremost bOI).d-rating agencies, a distinction held by fewer than two dozen of the nation's local governments; and WHEREAS, because of Mra Ramsey's emphasis on total quality and customer service, in 1994, Chesterfield County was awarded the U. Sa Senate Productivity and Quality Award, and followed this with being selected twice for the Award for Continuing Excellence; and WHEREAS, Mr. Ramsey has worked with five Superintendents of Schools to help build one of the best school systems in the nation, which is now one of the largest in Virginia with more than 60,000 students; and WHEREAS, Mr. Ramsey has been devoted to Chesterfield County employees, particularly to their training and development needs, and was instrumental in creating a learning organization through the development of Chesterfield University; and WHEREAS, a strong indicator of a locality's true success is how its residents feel about it; and WHEREAS, Citizen Satisfaction Surveys have consistently shown that nine out of ten Chesterfield County residents rate the county's quality of life as ngood" or uexcellent," and find the county to be safe and a wonderful place to raise their families; and WHEREAS, CNN/Money magazine named the county the u16th Best Place to Live in America"; and 00001.1 WHEREAS, Mr. Ramsey's leadership has garnered similar kudos and respect for the county from the business community, as evidenced by the results of the county's Business Satisfaction Survey; and WHEREAS, Lane B. Ramsey's national reputation for leadership in local government led to his selection as the winner of the prestigious 1997 National Public Service Award from the National Academy for Public Administration; and WHEREAS, a hallmark of Mr. Ramsey's tenure has been his strong commitment to regional cooperation, as evidenced by his service on the boards of the Greater Richmond Convention Center Authority, which he chaired in 2002 and again in 2007: the Appomattox River Water Authori ty, which he currently chairs; the South Central Regional Sewer Authority, for which he also served as secretary and treasurer; along with serving as chair of the university of Virginia's Institute of Government Advisory Committee; and also past service in a variety of other state and regional organizations: and WHEREAS, during his tenure, the county adopted its first annual budget to top $1 billion; experienced more than $2.5 billion in business investments, including welcoming Northrop Grumman as the largest business investor in the county's history; was twice named "One of the 100 Best Communities for Young People" by America's Promise-The Alliance for Youth: became the second locality in the nation to achieve ISO 14001, the international standard for environmental management systemsj was recognized several times for its leadership commitment to its employees serving in the reserve components of the u. S. military: and attained vast numbers of other awards and instances of special recognition; and WHEREAS, Mr. Ramsey retired on August 13, 2007; and WHEREAS, it is unlikely that anyone person will ever again exert the insightful, long-tenured and exemplary leadership of Chesterfield County that has exemplified Lane B. Ramsey/s service. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors, this 22nd day of August 2007/ publicly extends to Mr. Lane B. Ramsey the sincere appreciation of the residents and business community of Chesterfield County, and conveys to Mr. Ramsey and his wife, Paula, all best wishes for a long, well-deserved and happy retirement. AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that, in recognition of his outstanding leadership, the Board of Supervisors has directed that the county's Main Administration Building be named the Lane B. Ramsey Administration Building in honor of Mr. Lane B. Ramsey, who served as County Administrator for twenty years. AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this resolution be presented to Mr. Ramsey in recognition of his outstanding public service from January 1972 until August 13, 2007. 00001.2 .-~ ',~ j .~~ CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Meeting Date: August 22,2007 Item Number: 5. e# Subiect: Resolution Recognizing Firefighter Douglas K. Hanky, Chesterfield Emergency and Medical Services Department, Upon His Retirement County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: [) U Board Action Reauested: Adoption of resolution. Summary of Information: Staff is requesting the recognition of Firefighter Douglas K. Hanky, Chesterfield Emergency and Medical Services Department- for 27-1/2 years of , dedicated service to the citizens of Chesterfield Councy. Preparer: Matthew A. Coffin Title: Lieutenant-Communitv Programs Attachments: . Yes DNO # 00001.3 RECOGNIZING FIREFIGHTER DOUGLAS K. HANKY UPON HIS RETIREMENT WHEREAS, Firefighter Douglas K. Hanky will retire from the Fire and Emergency Medical Services Department, Chesterfield County, on September 1, 2007; and WHEREAS, Firefighter Hanky attended Recruit School #10 in October of 1979 and has faithfully served the county for nearly twenty-eight years in various assignments as a Firefighter-Paramedic at the Buford, Chester, Dale, Dutch Gap, Ettrick, Matoaca, and Rivers Bend Fire and EMS Departments; as a Flight Medic with Medflight One-Virginia State Police; and as a Fire-Public Educator in the Fire and Life Safety Division of the Fire and EMS Department; and WHEREAS, Firefighter Hanky was a member of one of the first flight crews in the establishment of Medflight 1, a collaboration between the Fire and EMS Department and Virginia State Police, on April I, 1984; and WHEREAS, Firefighter Hanky was recognized as an effective team member at emergency scenes, including key tactical positions that prevented the spread of fire and loss of life where lives and property were at risk; and WHEREAS, Firefighter Hanky was recognized on October 6, 1998 with a Fire and EMS Unit Citation for his role in the rescue of three individuals, one of whom was pregnant, from a capsized canoe in the Appomattox River; and WHEREAS, Firefighter Hanky was recognized on March 28, 2000 for his role in the successful resuscitation and treatment of a female patient in cardiac arrest who was treated and later released from the hospital; and WHEREAS, Firefighter Hanky was responsible for the successful delivery of a newborn baby girl in April of 2000, during a emergency medical incident in a Matoaca residence; and WHEREAS, Firefighter Hanky has had an active role in the education of well over 6,000 elementary school students, and countless numbers of employees, adults, and senior citizens as a public educator; and WHEREAS, Intervention instrumental children; and Firefighter Hanky is certified as a Juvenile Firesetter Specialist with the National Fire Academy and has been in the counseling of Juvenile Fire Setters and troubled WHEREAS, Firefighter Hanky has led the delivery of the Cadet Safety Camp, a collaborative effort by the Fire, Police, and Sheriff's office, for three consecutive years, providing safety training to a total of 178 children in that period; and WHEREAS, Firefighter Hanky has been recognized repeatedly by teachers, students, and parents with the Chesterfield County Public School system for his dedication and delivery of fire and life safety education. 000014 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors, this 22nd day of August 2007, publicly recognizes the contributions of Firefighter Douglas K. Hanky, expresses the appreciation of all residents for his service to the county, and extends appreciation for his dedicated service and congratulations upon his retirement. AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that a copy of this resolution be presented to Firefighter Hanky, and that this resolution be permanently recorded among the papers of this Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County, Virginia. 000015 . CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Meeting Date: August 22,2007 Item Number: 5.c... .-.....--..... Subiect: Resolution Recognizing Mrs. Sandra W. Coleman, Office of the Commissioner of the Revenue/ Upon Her Retirement County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: m {/ Board Action Reauested: Adoption of the attached resolution. Summary of Information: Mrs. Sandra W. Coleman will retire from the Chesterfield County Office of the Commissioner of the Revenue after providing 28-~ years of service to Chesterfield County citizens. Preparer: JoseDh A. HorbaL MCR Title: Commissioner of the Revenue Attachments: . Yes DNO # 00001.6 RECOGNIZING MRS. SANDRA W. COLEMAN UPON HER RETIREMENT WHEREAS, Mrs. Sandra W. Coleman will retire from the Office of the Commissioner of the Revenue on August 31, 2007; and WHEREAS, Mrs. Coleman began her public service with the county as a clerk-typist in the Office of the Commissioner of the Revenue on February 1, 1979, and has fai thfully served Chesterfield County for twenty-eight and one-half years; and WHEREAS, Mrs. Coleman, through hard work and dedication, progressed from the position of clerk-typist to her current position of administrative supervisor; and WHEREAS, Mrs. Coleman grew with the office and demonstrated flexibility and the highest level of service while displaying dedication to three different commissioners over her tenure; and WHEREAS, Mrs. able to respond manner; and Coleman, when met in a professional with and sensi ti ve si tuations, was confidential, yet caring, WHEREAS, Mrs. Coleman was able to take a job with oft,en complex duties and make it seem simple; and WHEREAS, Mrs. Coleman's vast knowledge, years of experience, and tireless dedication to supporting and achieving the goals and objectives of the Office of the Commissioner of the Revenue have enabled her to make a significant contribution to the success of this office; and WHEREAS, more than anything else, Mrs. Coleman has been a loyal friend to many, often a guidance counselor of sorts to the department, even humorously unpredictable, but with a friendly and caring attitude that will be sorely missed. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors, this 2200 day of August 2007, publicly recognizes the contributions of Mrs. Sandra W. Coleman to the citizens and administration of Chesterfield County; and extends appreciation for her commitment to the county, congratulations upon her successful career, and best wishes for a long and happy retirement. AN'D, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that a copy of this resolution be presented to Mrs. Coleman, and that this resolution be permanently recorded among the papers of this Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County, Virginia. 00001.7 I=-~ l. i~ - CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Meeting Date: August 22,2007 Item Number: 5.. D. Subiect: Recognition of 2007 NACo Achievement Award Winners County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Reauested: Summary of Information: Annually the Board of Supervisors recognizes county departments that receive Achievement Awards from the National Association of Counties (NACo). We are proud to announce that Chesterfield County is the recipient of 8 Achievement Awards this year. Public Affairs also received 11 awards from the National Association of County Information Officers (NACIO). Representatives from the appropriate departments are present to receive awards (see attached) . Preparer: Marilvn E. Cole Title: Assistant County Administrator Attachments: . Yes DNO # 000018 DEPARTMENT Circuit Court Judy Worthington Fire DeDartment Francis Kinnier, Jr~ Joe Newsome Human Resource Manae:ement Margaret Brogley Librarv Michael Mabe Mental Health Support Services Larry Barnett Police DeDartment Mary Garber Utilities DeDartment Fred Angel 2007 NACo ACHIEVEMENT AWARDS Chesterfield County, Virginia 16 Submitted - 8 Winners PROJECT Web-Based Marriage License Application The Citie of Henricus: Providing 21 st Century Fire Protection in 16th Century Buildings Accelerated Emergency Medical Technician- Intermediate Course Year of the Older Adult Family Worklife Program "So Many Books. . ~ So Little Time" Readers' Advisory: Connecting Books & Readers Mental Health Peer-Provider Program Cadet Safety Camp Identifying the Cost of Customer Services 000019 ":i11B!J)~'~ 1M.. .~ ll~') ~ !j8GIN_ ,.., CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 1 of 1 AGENDA Meeting Date: August 22,2007 Item Number: 8.A.1. Subiect: Nomination/Appointments to Various Boards and Commissions County Administrator's -Comments: County Administrator: fJ:J {/ Board Action Reauested: Summary of Information: Due to the retirement of Mr. Lane Ramsey as County Administrator, the following appointments are needed to various Boards and Commissions. See attached list. Preparer: Lisa H. Elko Title: Clerk to the Board Attachments: . Yes DNO I # I . 000020 BOARD APPOINTMENTS GREATER RICHMOND PARTNERSHIP Unspecified Term Mr. Jay Stegmaier, Alternate SOUTH CENTRAL WASTEWATER AUTHORITY BOARD Unspecified Term Mr. Jay Stegmaier 000021 ~ .~~~: . ~ CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 2 Meeting Date: August 22,2007 Item Number: 8.A.2. Subiect: Nominations/Appointments to the Youth Services Citizen Board County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Reauested: Nominate/appoint members to serve on the Youth Services Citizen Board. Summary of Information: The purpose of the Youth Services Citizen Board (YSCB) is to advise the Board of Supervisors regarding planning and policies affecting youth development and to provide a community forum to focus on youth issues. Matoaca District Supervisor Humphrey recommends that the Board nominate and appoint Janet Hall, an adult from the Matoaca District, to the Youth Services Citizen Board for a term from July 1, 2007 through June 30, 2010. Ms. Hall meets all eligibility requirements to fill the vacancy and has indicated her willingness to serve. Preparer: Jana D. Carter Title: Director, Juvenile Services Attachments: DYes .NO 000022 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 2 of 2 Bermuda District Supervisor King recommends that the Board nominate and appoint Christian Garland, a student at Thomas Dale High School, to the Youth Services Citizen Board for a term from July 1, 2007 through June 30, 2008. Mr. King also recommends that the Board nominated and appoint Mark D. Waitkus, an adult from the Bermuda District, to the Youth Services Citizen Board for a term from July 1, 2007 through June 30, 2010. Ms. Garland and Mr. Waitkus meet all eligibility requirements to fill the vacancies and have indicated their willingness to serve. Under existing Rules of Procedure, appointments to boards and committees are nominated at one meeting and appointed at the subsequent meeting unless the Rules of Procedure are suspended by a unanimous vote of the Board members present. Nominees are voted on in the order in which they are nominated. 000023 .~~ ~~I II ~~~rJ CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Meeting Date: August 22,2007 Item Number: 8.A.3. Subiect: Initial Appointments to the Lower Magnolia Green Community Development Authority Board County Administrator's COrJIments: County Administrator: W Board Action Reaue~: The Board is requested to appoint the following individuals to the Lower Magnolia Green Community Development Authority Board: 1. Art Heinz, President, Heinz Insurance, Inc.; 2. Deborah Girvin, Vice President of Human Resources, Shamin Hotels; 3. Robert M. (Mac) Bullock, Director of Operations, Getloaded.com; 4. Worth (Buddy) Whitfield, IBM; and 5. Manuel Flores, Brig. General U.S.Army (Retired) Summary of Information: A separate item on today's agenda requests the Board to hold a public hearing to consider a petition to create the Lower Magnolia Green Community Development Authority, and adopt a related ordinance. Upon adoption of the ordinance, this item requests the Board to appoint the above individuals to serve on the Lower Magnolia Green Community Development Authority Board. The Articles of Incorporation of the CDA (approved as part of the ordinance) detail the powers and duties of the CDA Board. The individuals presented for appointment have agreed to serve for an initial term of four (4) years. The Board of Supervisors concurs with these appointments. Under existing Rules of Procedure, appointments to boards and committees are nominated at one meeting and appointed at the subsequent meeting unless the Rules of Procedure are suspended by a unanimous vote of the Board members present. Pre parer: Rebecca T. Dickson Title: Deputv County Administrator Attachments: DYes _NO I # 0000241 1 '- ~ ..~ ~l..i i '; - CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 2 Meeting Date: August 22, 2007 Item Number: 8.A.4. Subiect: Nomination/Appointment to the Community Criminal Justice Board County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: flJ Board Action Reauestel It is requested that the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors approve the following nominee for appointment to the Community Criminal Justice Board (CCJB) for the remainder of a two-year term according to the adopted by-laws of the Community Criminal Justice Board. Appointments correspond to prescribed positions in the Code of Virginia. Summary of Information: The Community Criminal Justice Board (CCJB) serves the 12th Judicial Circuit Court consisting of Chesterfield County and the City of Colonial Heights. The purpose is to provide for the development, evaluation and planning of community programs and services for the court in diverting offenders from local correctional facilities. At the June 14, 1995 Meeting, the Board adopted a Resolution entitled Joint Resolution Providing for the Implementation of the Comprehensive Community Corrections Act (CCCA) and the Pretrial Services Act (PSA)i Establishment of the Chesterfield County and City of Colonial Heights Community Criminal Justice Boardi and provisions for Joint Exercise of Powers. The resolution designated the Membership by position, according to the Code of Virginia. The Community Criminal Justice Board members serve for two-year staggered terms; thus ten members are appointed each year. Preparer: Rebecca T. Dickson Title: Deputv County Administrator Attachments: I Yes DNO 000025 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 2 of 2 It is requested the following individual be appointed to serve the remainder of a two-year appointment that began July 1, 2006 and ends June 30, 2008. Colonel Thierry G. Dupuis (Citizen Appointment) Under the existing Rules of Procedure, appointments to Boards and Committees are nominated at one meeting and appointed at the subsequent meeting unless the Rules of Procedure are suspended by a unanimous vote of the Board members present. Nominees are voted on in the order in which they are nominated. 000026 Chesterfield County, Virginia Lane B. Ramsey, County Administrator 9901 Lori Road - P.O. Box 40 - Chesterfield, VA 23832-0040 Phone: (804) 748-1211 - Fax: (804) 717-6297 - Internet: chesterfield.gov BOARD OF SUPERVISORS KELLYE. MILLER Chairman Dale District RENNY BUSH HUMPHREY Vice Chairman Matoaca District R. M. "DICKIE" KlNGt JR. Bermuda District ARTHUR S. WARREN Clover Hill District DONALD D. SOWDER Midlothian District TO: Honorable Members, Board of Supervisors Jay Stegmaier, County Administrator FROM: Rebecca T. Dickson, Deputy County Administrator for Human Services DATE: August 14, 2007 SUBJECT: Community Criminal Justice Board (CCJB) Appointment It is requested that nominee, Colonel Thierry G. Dupuis be appointed to the Community Criminal Justice Board (CCJB) for the remainder of a two-year term that runs from July 1,2006 through June 30, 2008. The nominee would fill one of the two Chesterfield citizen positions on the CCJB that was vacated by the retirement of Colonel Baker. Colonel Dupuis- has indicated his willingness to serve if appointed and the Community Criminal Justice Board is recommending him. Nominees are also reviewed and appointed by the Colonial Heights City Council since each appointee must be approved by both localities. Providing a FIRST CHOICE community through excellence in public service 000027 IJ~' ) .~ CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Meeting Date: August 22, 2007 Item Number: 8.A.5. Subiect: Appointment of Trustees to the Supplemental Retirement Plan (Plan) County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: fJ1 Board Action ReauesteF" The Board of Supervisors is requested to appoint a new Trustee to the Supplemental Retirement Plan. Summary of Information: The Plan provides supplemental retirement benefits to long-term employees in management and leadership positions. The primary responsibility of the Trustees is to administer the Plan for the exclusive benefit of the Participants and their Beneficiaries, subject to the specific terms of the Plan. The Trustees shall have the power and discretion to construe the terms of the Plan and to determine all questions arising in connection with the administration, interpretation and application of the Plan. The Board of Supervisors shall appoint three (3) or more persons to serve as Trustees at the pleasure of the Board. Mr. Jay Stegmaier will step down as a Trustee of the Plan on August 31, 2007. Richard Cordle, Mary Lou Lyle and Craig Bryant will continue to serve as Trustees. The Board of Supervisors is requested to appoint Thierry Dupuis as Trustee, effective September 1[ 2007. Chief Dupuis has indicated his willingness to serve. Preparer: Karla J. Gerner Title: Director. HRM Attachments: DYes .NO # 000028 .lEth~ ~ ~ , Ii . P!~f1 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 2 Meeting Date: August 22,2007 Item Number: 8.B. Subiect: Streetlight Installation Cost Approvals County-Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: 9J Board Action Reauested: This item requests Board approval of new streetlight installations in the Dale and Midlothian Districts. Summary of Information: Streetlight requests from individual citizens or C1V1C groups are received in the Department of Environmental Engineering. Staff requests cost quotations from Dominion Virginia Power for each request received. When the quotations are received, staff re-examines each request and presents them at the next available regular meeting of the Board of Supervisors for consideration. Staff provides the Board with an evaluation of each request based on the following criteria: 1. Streetlights should be located at intersections; CONTINUED NEXT PAGE Preparer: Richard M. McElfish Title: Director, Environmental Engineering Attachments: II Yes ONO # 000029 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 2 of 2 Summary of Information: (Continued\ 2. There should be a minimum average of 600 vehicles per day (VPD) passing the requested location if it is an intersection, or 400 VPD if the requested location is not an intersection; 3. Petitions are required and should include 75% of residents within 200 feet of the requested location and if at an intersection, a majority of those residents immediately adjacent to the intersection. Cost quotations from Dominion virginia Power are valid for a period of 60 days. The Board, upon presentation of the cost quotation may approve, defer, or deny the expenditure of funds from available District Improvement Funds for the streetlight installation. If the expenditure is approved, staff authorizes Dominion Virginia Power to install the streetlight. A denial of a project will result in its cancellation and the District Improvement Fund will be charged the design cost shown; staff will notify the requestor of the denial. proj eC,ts cannot be deferred for more than 30 days due to quotation expiration. Quotation expiration has the same effect as a denial. DALE DISTRICT: . Not in a recorded subdivision, on Nash Road I in the vicinity of 10705 Cost to install streetlight: $448.88 (Design Cost: $110.92) Does not meet minimum criterion for intersection ~, MIDLOTHIAN DISTRICT: . In the Highland Hills subdivision: South intersection of Ben Nevis Drive and Robert Bruce Drive Cost to install streetlight: $1,686.20 (Design Cost: $221.84) Meets minimum criteria For information regarding available balances in the District Improvement Fund accounts, please reference the District Improvement Fund Report. 000030 STREETLIGHT REQUEST Dale District Request Received: March 19,2007 Estimate Requested: March 191 2007 Estimate Received: August 81 2007 Days Estimate Outstanding: 142 NAME OF REQUESTOR: Mr. Jack Yeratt ADDRESS: 10701 Nash Road Chesterfield. VA 23838 REQUESTED LOCATION: Nash Road, on the existing pole in the vicinity of 10705 Nash Road Cost to install streetlight: $448.88 POLICY CRITERIA: Intersection: Not Qualified, location is not an intersection Vehicles Per Day: Qualified Petition: Qualified Requestor Comments: "The section of road just south of Morissett Road to Applewhite Lane has four private driveways intersecting with Nash Road that have little or no light and are considered unsafe property entrances from Nash Road. Entrances are unsafe any time of day, but especially during the absence of light. The current use of tape, etc., for markings are insufficient methods for drivers to discern property entrances. North bound vehicle lights does not make it easier and it is impossible to detect the presence of wildlife when entering property. . . example, recently when exiting Nash, unseen deer activity was encountered immediately (like a vehicle length off the road). It could have been ugly if the activity had been different. This activity could not be seen when exiting Nash. Also consider, it would be almost impossible for unfamiliar drivers to the area to find entrances to these properties with our hills and ravines." 000031. Street Light Request Map August 22, 2007 --J ~ ! ~ ~ t ~o '?J~~ co.r. MORRrSE"TT RD . tP f? :t- ~ This map is a copyrighted prod uct of th e Ch esterfie Id County GI S Office. N Street Light Legend t existing light e requested light This map shows citizen re qu ested stre etlight installatio ns in relatio n to existing streetlights. Existin 9 streetlig ht info rmation was o bt a i n e d fro m th e C he st e rti e Ide 0 un ty Environ menta I Engin eering 0 ep artme nt. {....~. '\ 625 o 1.250 Feet 000032 STREETLIGHT REQUEST Midlothian District Request Received: January 17,2007 Estimate Requested: January 17, 2007 Estimate Received: July 22, 2007 Days Estimate Outstanding: 181 NAME OF REQUESTOR: Ms. Christine Billings ADDRESS: 8229 Robert Bruce Drive Richmond, VA 23235 REQUESTED LOCATION: In the Highland Hills subdivision, at the south intersection of Ben Nevis Drive and Robert Bruce Drive. Cost to install streetlight: $1 ,686.20 POLICY CRITERIA: Intersection: Qualified Vehicles Per Day: Qualified Petition: Qualified Requestor Comments: "Purpose is to prevent vandalism and prevent cars from driving off road into deep ditch - - both of which have occurred at this location." 000033 Street Light Request Map August 22, 2007 &Ofv :"\ .4 IF? STA..nO~ c -rJlo ~ ~ tP ,;.. "Y'.,A ~ ~ z ';tl Q:) m ~ co ';I) c o (n o ~ I3~NDi.;M~~f:? f:?o ..A C~ ~ 'Y ~ G~~N Cc 1\ lJ~ BeN 1Itf2 ~s Off -<<0 00 ~~ CIA ~ 'tro"tl- t\~ o~ :e.O ROBERte~UC ~ This map is a copyrighted product of th e Ch esterfie Id Co unty 81 S Office. N This map shows citize n re qu ested stre et Ii 9 h tin st all a ti 0 n sin rela ti 0 n to existing streetlights. Street Light Legend t existing light e requested light Existin 9 streetlig ht info rmation was obtained from the Chesterfield County Environ menta I En gineering 0 epartme nt. "~.- . t,:. :#..' . '-, , 410 205 o 410 Feet -,- .~ 000034 8 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 2 Meeting Date: August 22, 2007 Item Number: 8.C.1. Subiect: Authorize the Receipt and Appropriation of Grant Funds in the Amount of $84,000 from the Commonwealth of Virginia Department of Health, Office of Emergency Medical Services County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: 0'\ () Board Action Reauested: Authorize the Fire and EMS Department to receive and appropriate $84,000 in grant funds from the Commonwealth of Virginia Department of Health, Office of Emergency Medical Services. Summary of Information: The Board of Supervisors is requested to approve the acceptance and appropriation of $84,000 in grant funds from the Commonwealth of Virginia Department of Health, Office of Emergency Medical Services to help fund the purchase of eight Zoll defibrillators which are valuable, life saving equipment I which will further enhance the delivery of Emergency Medical Services to the citizens of our county. The grant has a local match requirement of $84,000, which will be funded from the FY08 Revenue Recovery operating budget. Preparer: Paul W. Mauoer DYes Title: Fire Chief Attachments: .NO 10000j51 8 ""'~~ CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 2 of 2 Meeting Date: August 22,2007 Budaet and Manaaement Comments: This item requests that the Board authorize the receipt and appropriation of a State grant in the amount of $84 1000 which will be matched with Revenue Recovery funds to purchase eight defibrillators (at a cost of $21,000 each). Five additional defibrillators will be purchased during FY2008 with Revenue Recovery funding which will equip all the ambulances with the newest technology available. Preparer: Allan M. Carmody Title: Director. Budaet and Manaoement 000036 ~ - CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 1 of 1 AGENDA Meeting Date: August 22,2007 Item Number: 8.C.2.a. Subiect: Resolution Recognizing Firefighter J. Kirk Seither, Chesterfield Fire and Emergency Medical Services Department, Upon His Retirement County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: (f) (T Board Action Reauested: Adoption of resolution. Summary of Information: Staff is requesting the Board of Supervisors recognize Firefighter J. Kirk Seither's retirement on August I, 2007 after serving the county with dedicated service for 25 years. Preparer: Paul W. MauQer Title: Fire Chief Attachments: . Yes DNO #1 00003~'~ 1 RECOGNIZING FIREFIGHTER J. KIRK SEITHER UPON HIS RETIREMENT WHEREAS, Firefighter J. Kirk Seither retired from the Fire and Emergency Medical Services Department, Chesterfield County, on August 1, 2007; and WHEREAS/ Firefighter Seither attended Career Recruit School #12 in 1982 and has faithfully served the county for over twenty-five years in various assignments as a Firefighter at the Dutch Gap, Dale, Centralia, and Enon Fire and EMS Stations, and was also assigned to the Rivers Bend Fire and EMS Stationj and WHEREAS, Firefighter Sei ther served as a back-up flight medic with the initial crew of the Virginia State Police Med-Flight medical evacuation helicopter at the inception of that program in the Commonwealth of Virginia; and WHEREAS, Firefighter Seither was involved in many successful fire and emergency medical incident scenes, including service as a member of the county's SCUBA Rescue team where he was part of a boat crew that on August 18, 1985 rescued a citizen stranded on the top of his automobile after it was swept off the roadway by the rapidly flowing flood waters of a rain-swollen powhite Creek; and WHEREAS, Firefighter Seither was recognized with a Life Save Award for the professional care he rendered to a patient suffering from an obstructed airway at the patient's home in the Greenleigh Trailer Park on March 18, 1995; and WHEREAS, Firefighter Seither development program and attained specialist in February 2001; and participated in a position as a the career firefighter WHEREAS, Firefighter Seither has continued for these many years of service to demonstrate performance meeting the highest expectations of Chesterfield County and the Fire and EMS Department. NOW, THEREFORE/ BE IT RESOLVED that the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors recognizes the contributions of Firefighter J. Kirk Seither, expresses the appreciation of all residents for his service to the county, and extends appreciation for his dedicated service and congratulations upon his retirement. 0000'38 ..~ I , ! I .,!tJ -~~g CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Meeting Date: August 22, 2007 Item Number: 8.C.2.b. Subiect: Resolution Recognizing Firefighter Marvin James, Chesterfield Fire and Emergency Medical Services Department, Upon His Retirement County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: ~ U Board Action Reauested: Adoption of resolution. Summary of Information: Recognizing Firefighter Marvin James, Chesterfield Fire and Emergency Medical Services Department, upon his retirement on September 1, 2007, after providing 21 years of service to the citizens of Chesterfield County. Preparer: Paul W. Mauaer Title: Fire Chief Attachments: . Yes DNo # 0000.39. RECOGNIZING FIREFIGHTER MARVIN M. JAMES UPON HIS RETIREMENT WHEREAS, Firefighter Marvin M. James will retire from the Fire and EMS Department, Chesterfield County, on September 1, 2007; and WHEREAS, Firefighter James attended Recruit School #17 in 1986 and has faithfully served the county for over twenty-one years in various assignments as a firefighter at the Bon Air Fire and EMS Department; the Airport Fire and EMS station; and the Matoaca Fire and EMS Department; and WHEREAS, Firefighter James was involved and recognized for the extrication of a victim who had fallen seventy-five feet inside of a smoke stack at the Dutch Gap Power Station in October 1994; and WHEREAS, Firefighter James was recognized in September 2002 with an Emergency Medical Services award for his role in saving the life of a citizen suffering from cardiac arrest; and WHEREAS, Firefighter James was involved and recognized for the successful extrication of a horse that was stuck in mud on a Matoaca Road farm in May 2004. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors recognizes the contributions of Firefighter James, expresses the appreciation of all residents for his service to the County, and extends appreciation for his dedicated service and congratulations upon his retirement. 0000-40 ~ ~ CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Meeting Date: August 22,2007 Item Number: 8.C.2.c. Subiect: Resolution Recognizing Mr. William F. Moss, Utilities Department, Upon His Retirement County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: c0 () Board Action Reauested: Staff requests the Board adopt the attached resolution. Summary of Information: Staff requests the Board adopt the attached resolution recognizing Mr. William F. Moss for 31 years of service to the Chesterfield County Utilities Department. District: Preparer: Roy E. Covinaton Title: Director of Utilities Attachments: . Yes DNO # 000041k I RECOGNIZING MR. WILLIAM F. MOSS UPON HIS RETIREMENT WHEREAS, Mr. William F. Moss has served the County of Chesterfield as a faithful employee of the Utilities Department since his original hiring on October 13, 1976; and WHEREAS, the expertise developed by Mr. Moss during his tenure as a waterworks operator at the Falling Creek and then Addison/Evans Water Plants has enabled him to make significant contributions to the operation of these two facilities; and WHEREAS, Mr. Moss has willingly shared his accumulated knowledge and expertise with his younger, developing colleagues to aid them in their growth and development; and WHEREAS, Mr. Moss has always presented the citizens of Chesterfield County with the highest level of customer service and a patient and genteel demeanor that reflected positively on a competent and caring Chesterfield County workforce; and WHEREAS, the gentlemanly temperament and true concern for his co- workers demonstrated by Mr. Moss during his years of employment with the Utilities Department have resulted in his being a well-liked and valued colleague. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors recognizes Mr. William F. Moss for his outstanding contributions, expresses the appreciation of all residents for his service to the county, and extends appreciation for his dedicated service, congratulations upon his retirement, and best wishes for a long and happy retirement. 000042 ~ - :%-~~ CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Meeting Date: August 22,2007 Item Number: 8.C.2.d. Subiect: Resolution Recognizing September 24, 2007, as "Family Day" in Chesterfield County County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: ~ r Board Action Reauested: The Board of Supervisors is requested to adopt the resolution. Summary of Information: Chesterfield County will join states and localities across the nation in recognizing September 24, 2007 as "Family Day - A Day to Eat Dinner With Your Children." Family Day was established by the Center for Addiction and Substance Abuse at Columbia University. It focuses attention on research findings that show children in families that frequently eat dinner together are much less likely to use tobacco, alcohol or other drugs. President Bush, governors and local officials across the country are encouraged to recognize Family Day. Youth Planning and Development and SAFE are promoting awareness of Family Day in Chesterfield County. Preparer: Jana D. Carter Title: Director. Juvenile Services Attachments: . Yes DNO I # 000043 RECOGNIZING SEPTEMBER 24, 2007, AS "FAMILY DAY - A DAY TO EAT DINNER WITH YOUR CHILDREN" WHEREAS, the observance of uFamily Day - A Day to Eat Dinner with Your Children" provides a unique opportunity for families in Chesterfield County to join one another at the dinner table as a means of strengthening family relationships; and WHEREAS, parental influence is known to be one of the most crucial factors in determining the likelihood of substance abuse by teenagers; and WHEREAS, surveys conducted by the National Center on Addiction and Substance Abuse have consistently found that children and teenagers who routinely eat dinner with their families are far less likely to use cigarettes, alcohol and illegal drugs; and WHEREAS, meal times offer opportuni ties time together, providing a basic structure encourages lasting relationships; and for families to spend that strengthens and WHEREAS, young people from families who almost never eat dinner together compared to those that do are 72 percent more likely to use cigarettes, alcohol and illegal drugs; and WHEREAS, the correlation between family dinners and reduced risk for teen substance abuse is well documented; and WHEREAS, Chesterfield County Youth Planning and Development and SAFE, Chesterfield's substance abuse prevention coalition, are promoting the importance of family dinners to parents in Chesterfield County, Virginia; and WHEREAS, the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors recognizes that eating dinner as a family is an important step toward raising drug-free children. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors recognizes Monday, September 24, 2007, as "Family Day - A Day to Eat Dinner With Your Children," to recognize the positive impact of strong family interaction on the well being and future success of the young people in Chesterfield County. 000044 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Meeting Date: August 22,2007 Item Number: 8.C.2.e. Subiect: Recognizing Mr. Joshua Phillip Logan Williamson and Mr. Max William Hrank Upon Attaining Rank of Eagle Scout County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator::;) V Board Action Reauested: Adoption of attached resolution. Summary of Information: Staff has received a request for the Board to adopt a resolution recognlzlng Mr. Joshua Phillip Logan Williamson, Troop 879, sponsored by Saint Mark's United Methodist Church, and Mr. Max William Hrank, Troop 800, sponsored by Bethel Baptist Church, upon attaining the rank of Eagle Scout. Pre parer: Lisa Elko Title: Clerk to the Board Attachments: . Yes DNO # 000045 WHEREAS, the Boy Scouts of America was incorporated by Mr. William D. Boyce on February 8, 1910, and was chartered by Congress in 1916; and WHEREAS, the Boy Scouts of America was founded to build character, provide citizenship training and promote physical fitness; and WHEREAS, after earning at least twenty-one merit badges in a wide variety of skills including leadership, service and outdoor life, serving in a leadership posi tion in a troop, carrying out a service proj ect beneficial to their community, being active in the troop, demonstrating Scout spirit, and living up to the Scout Oath and Law Mr. Joshua Phillip Logan Williamson, Troop 879, sponsored by Saint Mark's United Methodist Church and Mr. Max William Hrank, Troop 800, sponsored by Bethel Baptist Church have accomplished those high standards of commitment and have reached the long-sought goal of Eagle Scout which is received by only four percent of those individuals entering the Scouting movement; and WHEREAS, growing through their experiences in Scouting, learning the lessons of responsible citizenship, and endeavoring to prepare themselves for roles as leaders in society, Joshua and Max have distinguished themselves as members of a new generation of prepared young citizens of whom we can all be very proud. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors hereby extends its congratulations to Mr. Joshua Phillip Logan Williamson, Troop 879, sponsored by Saint Mark's United Methodist Church and Mr. Max William Hrank, and acknowledges the good fortune of the county to have such outstanding young men as its citizens. 000046 .-'- II II i -- . >> . ~G(N.~~. CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Meeting Date: August 22, 2007 Item Number: 8.C.2.f. Subiect: Resolution Recognizing Major Warner w. Williams, Police Department, Upon His Retirement County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: ((J L Board Action Reauested: The adoption of the attached resolution. Summary of Information: Major Warner w. Williams retired from the Police Department after having provided over 27 years of service to the citizens of Chesterfield County. Pre parer: Colonel Thierry G. Dupuis Title: Chief of Police Attachments: . Yes DNO # I 0.00047 I RECOGNIZING MAJOR WARNER M. WILLIAMS UPON HIS RETIREMENT WHEREAS, Major Warner W. Williams retired from the Chesterfield County Police Department on July 1, 2007, after providing 27 years of quality service to the citizens of Chesterfield County; and WHEREAS, Major Williams has faithfully served the county in the capacity of Patrol Officer, Sergeant, Lieutenant, Captain, and Major; and WHEREAS I Maj or Williams was selected as Rookie of the Year for the year of 1980; and WHEREAS, Major Williams has also served the Police Department as a member of the Tactical Team, PERT Coordinator and SWAT Team Commander; and WHEREAS, Major Williams was a graduate of the first Police Executive Leadership School and is also a graduate of the FBI National Academy and Chesterfield County's Total Quality Improvement Program; and WHEREAS, Major Williams has served as Division Commander for four divisions of the Police Department, and has served as Maj or of all three sworn Bureaus; and WHEREAS, Major Williams has and appreciation for service Chesterfield County; and received numerous rendered from letters of thanks the citizens of WHEREAS, Major Williams has provided the Chesterfield County Police Department with many years of loyal and dedicated service; and WHEREAS I Chesterfield County and the Board of Supervisors will miss Major Williams' diligent service. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors recognizes Maj or Warner W. Williams, and extends on behalf of its members and the citizens of Chesterfield County, appreciation for his service to the county, congratulations upon his retirement, and best wishes for a long and happy retirement. 00004"8 U.m " ~.<.~ ~U CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Meeting Date: August 22,2007 Item Number: 8.C.2.g. Subiect: Resolution Recognizing Firefighter Kevin Goins, Chesterfield Fire and Emergency Medical Services Department, Upon His Retirement County Administratorls Comments: County Administrator: OJ u Board Action Reauested: Adoption of attached resolution. Summary of Information: The Board of Supervisors is asked to recognize Firefighter Kevin Goins, Chesterfield Fire and Emergency Medical Services Department, upon his retirement on May 1, 2007, for nearly 30 years of dedicated service to the county. Attachments: Paul W. Mauoer . Yes Title: Deputy Fire Chief Preparer: DNO I 000049 RECOGNIZING FIREFIGHTER KEVIN R. GOINS UPON HIS RETIREMENT WHEREAS, Firefighter Kevin R. Goins retired from the Fire and EMS Department, Chesterfield County, on May 1, 2007; and WHEREAS, Firefighter Goins was hired as a dispatcher in the Emergency Communications Center known as "Fire Alarm Headquarters" in 1977; and WHEREAS, Firefighter Goins transferred to the maintenance and logistics section of the fire department in 1978j and WHEREAS, Firefighter Goins attended Recruit School #9 in 1978 and has faithfully served the county for nearly thirty years in various assignments as a firefighter at the Manchester, Chester, Buford, Midlothian and Beach Fire and EMS Stations; as a firefighter at the Manchester, Chester, Buford, Midlothian and Beach Fire and EMS Stations; and WHEREAS, Firefighter Goins was recognized as a third generation member of the Chesterfield Fire Department at emergency scenes, including a key tactical position at the Smith fire that prevented the fire from spreading to other parts of the building. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors recognizes the contributions of Firefighter Kevin R. Goins, expresses the appreciation of all residents for his service to the county, and extends appreciation for his dedicated service and congratulations upon his retirement. 000050 .- ~' , " , - -'. -:. ~ ~H CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 2 Meeting Date: August 22,2007 Item Number: 8.C.3. Subiect: Authorize the County Administrator to Renew a Health Care Contract with Anthem Blue Cross and Blue Shield and a Dental Care Contract with Delta Dental Plan of Virginia for 2008 County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: <~' .. . >-.. Board Action ReauesteJ( The Board of Supervisors is requested to authorize the County Administrator to renew the county's contract with Anthem Blue Cross and Blue Shield (Anthem) and its contract with Delta Dental Plan of Virginia (Delta Dental) for 2008 at the rates attached. Summary of Information: With the technical assistance of Wachovia Employer Solutions, a national benefits consulting firm, county and schools staff recently completed the rate renewal process for the 2008 employee health and dental programs. In order to continue to provide employees with quality health and dental care options, it is recommended that the county renew its current contracts with Anthem and Delta Dental. Under the proposed 2008 program, employees will have the choice of three different Anthem health plans (two HMOs and a PPO) and two dental plans (basic and comprehensive). Health care rates will increase 5.5%, and dental rates will increase 7.0% in 2008. Members of the joint Board of Supervisors and School Board Benefits Committee were briefed on these issues and recommend approval to the full boards. The School Board will approve a similar agenda item on August 28, 2007. Pre parer: Karla J. Gerner Title: Director, Human Resource ManaQement Attachments: . Yes DNO I # OOOOS:!. CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 2 of 2 Meeting Date: August 22,2007 Budaet and Manaaement Comments: This item requests that the Board authorize the County Administrator to renew the health care contract with Anthem Blue Cross and Blue Shield and renew the dental care contract with Delta Dental Plan of Virginia for calendar year 2008. The proposed rates in the attached schedule represent an increase in calendar year 2008 health care costs of 5.5% and an increase in dental care costs of 7.0%. The proposed health care rate increase of 5.5% is less than what was projected during the FY2008 budget process. Actual expenditure savings and corresponding recommendations will be evaluated with the annual year end process. Preparer: Allan M. Carmody Title: Director, Budaet and Manaaement 000052 .~..~ .~ - .'(~ ~~~~ CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 2 Meeting Date: August 22,2007 Item Number: 8.C.4.A, Subiect: Request for an Entertainment Festival Permit for the Chesterfield County Airport Festival and Airshow for October 20 and 21, 2007 County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: ()j (J Board Action Reauested: The Board of Supervisors is requested to grant an entertainment festival permit to the Chesterfield County Airport Festival Airshow for October 20 and 21, 2007. Summary of Information: The Chesterfield County Airport proposes to conduct a Festival and Airshow ("Airshow") at the Chesterfield County Airport on October 20 and 21, 2007 at 7511 Airfield Drive, Richmond, VA 23237. The Airshow will be sponsored by Uppy's Convenience Stores, Inc., Shamin Hotels, Enterprise Rental Car, Clear Channel Radio, Delta Airport Consultants and Dominion Aviation Services. The Airshow will continue to pursue additional sponsors over the course of the next couple of months. All net proceeds will be donated to the United Way. The Airshow is working with vendors to sell Airshow related memorabilia, as well as a variety of food. Pre parer: Steven L. Micas Title: County Attornev 0505:75912.1 Attachments: . Yes DNO # I 00005'i CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 2 of 2 The show will begin at 9:00 a.m. and end at 4:00 p.m. each day. General Admission tickets will be sold in advance for $10.00 per adult and $15 at the gate with children under 12 admitted free. The promoters estimate that ten to twenty thousand visitors per day will attend. There will be no parking on site for the general public. Parking will be available at the County Courts Complex, The County Administration Complex, L.C. Bird High School, O.B. Gates Elementary School, and the Chesterfield Tech Center. School Board Transportation will provide shuttle bus service from those parking areas to the Airport. The Airshow will consist of aerobatic teams, parachute teams, military fly- bys, a jet-powered ambulance, World War II military aircraft, a wing walking act and many more exciting performers. Also scheduled are a NASA education display, the Denny Hamlin Fed Ex show-car, and other ground displays. There will be a classic Mustang car show administered by the Richmond Mustang Car Clubs. Activities for children in the "kids zone" include a rock climbing wall, a space simulator, and a parachute packing lesson. A Federal Aviation Administration representative will be on site to assist. All Airshow acts have submitted proof of their insurance. The Airport's application and the plan for the event, a copy of which is attached, meet the requirements of the County Code regulating entertainment festival permits. In addition to the County Attorney's review, Charles Dane, Director of Aviation Services has met with public safety, Health, and Risk Management staff in order to ensure a safe and successful Airshow. Airshow plans developed with staff assistance include measures to ensure public safety, fire prevention, medical protection, sanitation, traffic control, insurance coverage and security. If the permit is granted, staff will monitor compliance with all conditions imposed during the two show days. 0505:75912.1 000055 1;. .. Chesterfield County-, Virginia Memorandum COUNlY ATTORNEYIS OFFICE D~~ TE: .July' 12, 20,0'7 -TO: STELL'.PART-H,E:~IO'S FROM.:. C:IIARLE,SE..- DANE, _~URPO'RT l\L\N;..\G'- , :$[TBJE'CT:: ,RE:QITE$T FOR _FE'S'TIV~L-- }>E'II~~f~T We. would like to request your assistance: With obtaining a festiv,al permit for the Cheste-rfiel,d :Gou:ntyR-eglonal :Air' Show :th~twe:~:re planning,. Chesterfield' 'County Airport ,is ~he-a:ppl.ica:nt as well as,the: e"e.nt' promoter~ Th~ Festiva:I/AirshowwUI :be in,pa'rt $pon'$or~d: by tJ-pp)ls Conve.nience,S_to"res, Sha'rhin Hotels" 'Entet:prise, :R'e,ntat Car, Clear C'hanne.J. ,R,adio, Detta Airport Co,n'u:ltantsa,nd 'Dom'inlon Avi'atiqn - Seryices,~ We .~ncon,tinlJe- to pursue additionals:p.o,ns:ors over t'he co:l1rse of the '-next cou'ple ofmonths~ Tickets' willo6st :$1-0: i,n -adva:n.ce' -an'd $t5 at the_ gate withchildre'n und,er 12a,dmitted "free. AU netproceeds-wili -be donated to' Urlited: VVay. ' -The event will be: he:ldS,aturday" October20th., and, Sund:ay. O~o'ber 2t-t2007, at :7511 Airfield Dtive, Richmond, VA 23237~. The' s:hoW wil1::beg'inat.g.::OO a..m., and end: at4:--QO p.m. each day._ There: wi 1.1 -be -no,patking on -site -for the, general, pubHc~ H_oweve.r, p_arkil1g will be av'ailable . at the County .CourtsComplex1The.Co:unty Ad rn i nIstrati on- Co.mp'lex,.. L.C. Byrd High School". 0-.8. 'G,ates Elementary -$choolt, and:, the. Chesterfield-technical Center" Schoo'l S:oard T.ra,ns'p:o'rtation. will :pro'vide- shuttle busses. from: those 'pa_rking. areas to theai:rport. W~ :anti~ipate ten to tvve,pty thousa,nd' visitors- each day '" Security.and crowd control wiU be_prov_ided by: the.Cheste_meld 'County :'Police ,Departme'nt. Also availabJewillbe the Vlrginj~ StC3~~poncea-nd: C,M,I Ait P$trot.:both located ,at theaJrport~ Cheste:rfield'F:ire, and EMS, -Station 1:-5- -an-d, tn:e, ,Sta:te _:Police MecHcal Eva,cuation H-eJieopter are both located on s:ite 'and.'wUrbe,av~iI~ble immediate-Iy'for med:ic&lJ em.erg_encie$ thrQ_ugho,lJt otheeve_nt. We. a-re working with. ve'nd:orswho win...s'ell :Ai't Sho~l rel,ated .m:ernorabUia,_ as .weUasa vari-etyoffood.: . P(9viq~g-a FIRSTQI-lOtCE-$q~l.1tlity thr$'t~gh :e~cellen~. in',P1JPli(:?'~ervig~' 000056 .. .. ,Ente:rtalnment will :~onslst of: ae.rob~tie tea_rns to inclu.de lh:ree time 'world: champion Patty Wag:staff, the Army Golden'Knig_htsparach:ute -teams-~ military fly-bys:. :ajef powered:am'bul'~nce:, V\Mtlrm'ilitary' ~Jrcraff, 'a: 'vvtng -walking act., qnd many _moree"citi"nQ'perforrners ..Aisoscbed,ule"d:,;s A NASA_edu,catio,n, disp.lay) the' Detln:y H:amU"n -:Fed Exs.how"c;at~ 'ti:nd-; 'other .sroundd-l$:plays'~We. vvitla_lso' h~v'ea_ cl_tJssic mustaI'lQ" csr-show' that wUI:be administered: :by :th~Ri_c-hrnQnd_- Mu.sta_ng:- Car Club$~ There Will be, activitie$,,:for chndr~n:,itJthe t'~id$ zon~.t-tp inclUde a Joc.k:cUmbingWalttl_ spa.ce sJm-u-lator~ a:nd-.a parachutepackin.g.lesson:. ' Mair 'bQ$8 hafS 11-e~,ncQt1tracted- tQ:directthe. A.irSllQ:'\~f a.ctsand Ute airspa,ce\,ra:iye~requ_est lla:~ been slJbtnitte:cj to~n~~p"pro~veQ _by the,: FAA. 'Margaret Morrison ITomthe FM'\vill b~ on site to assist 4 Airshow,aets have' submitted . proof oftlleir - -_in.surallce~ We will 'send a cO"Qut)tall,e.inail to:$Qlicit '~Qlunteets. and we e'xpectll_p, to:'2'O(l\Tolunt~.ets'" iftl,,_e: P-a$t-t\\lD $how~ afe any ,in_dicat-iQtt~\11e will alsQbave v~Oltlnteer$., ,tr9Dl tb'e Civil Air Patrol an4 th':e nlenlbers oftlle Young 'Eagles Club.. We: are ~rotkll).g: -closely' ,~rith the Che:StertleldC,Oullty Fir-e .,and Police Dep:artmetit$,. Public: Aftairs,,: Scho,ol13oatdTr4J.~PQrtatioll, Ri~ '~lal1~em'en(, :.l'~.r~ and RecteatiQn~. General S'wvices Radi.o SllQP and,Pril1tSb('fp, 'Virginia pe-parttllentQf Tt"1l$]?ortattQ.n-.a.t14' -DominiQ1.1 Aviatio'n Services an'.d others.:: to plan.1his:evenf.. .Our intent is '10 provide' a uT;ond:erfulexperien.ee" to the. citize118 of:C.llest.erfield C:oultty .and the. Richmond Re,~.on. P1;Qvi4ing,a FlRST 'GIiOICE-. 9Q@1?~ty thr~i~ :e;~~~Ue1+~.'itl:Jj1JP1ic.-:$erviqe- 000057 B.~ ~~lP CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 2 Meeting Date: August 22, 2007 Item Number: 8.C.4.b. Subiect: Request for a Music/Entertainment Festival Permit for Chesterfield Berry Farm on Saturdays and Sundays between September 22 and October 31, 2007 County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: f):J Board Action Reauested: The Board of Supervisors is requested to grant a request for a music/entertainment festival permit for Chesterfield Berry Farm for Saturday and Sundays between September 22 and October 31, 2007. Summary of Information: Chesterfield Berry Farm proposes to conduct outdoor music during the October season on the lawns of the Chesterfield Berry Farm which is located at 26002 Pear Orchard Road, Moseley, Virginia. The music will be held on Saturdays and Sundays from September 22, through October 31, 2007. A Pumpkin Festival will be held on October 13 and 14, 2007 which will also include music. The Berry Farm opens at 9:00 a.m. Music will begin at 11:00 a.m. and end at 4:00 p.m., with all other activities ending at 6:00 p.m. Preparer: Steven L. Micas Title: County Attornev 0505:76209.1 Attachments: . Yes DNO # 000058- CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 2 of 2 Chesterfield Berry Farm is both the applicant and event promoter. The Berry Farm is currently seeking corporate sponsors to help offset the major costs of the event. All net proceeds from the music series will go to the Berry Farm. Chesterfield Berry Farm will assume full financial responsibility for the Festival and music series. Nick's Karaoke will be playing music on all weekends except for the October 13 and 14 Pumpkin Festival, which will feature a live band. The band has not yet been hired. No separate admission fee will be charged for the music or pumpkin festival. It is anticipated that approximately 3,000 people will attend the event during the Festival hours. Chesterfield Berry Farm has facilities where food, water, and soft drinks will be available for purchase during hours of operation. Portolets remain on the location throughout the season and are serviced twice a week by Nes services. Chest~rfield Berry Farm has clean-up and trash disposal. There is ample parking, and off-duty police officers will assist with parking, crowd control and other security needs. Emergency medical and fire department officials have been made aware of the event and are available to render service if needed. The music/entertainment arrangements have been reviewed by the County Attorney's Office and meet the substantive requirements of the ordinance. These arrangements provide adequate measures to insure public safety, fire prevention, medical protection, sanitation, traffic control, insurance coverage, relevant permi ts and securi ty. The Berry Farm has sponsored similar festivals in the spring and fall of the past three years. All of these events have been safely conducted in accordance with County requirements. Although the Board of Supervisors may require a bond to insure compliance with the permit, the Board traditionally has not required a bond except when the event occurs on County property. Staff recommends that the Board not require a bond. 0505:76209.1 OOOQ59 August 6, 2007 Stylian P. Parthemos Chesterfield County Administration Building, Room 503 P.O. Box 40 Chesterfield, Va 23832-0040 COUNlY AnoRNEY'S OffiCE Dear Mr. Parthemos, Thank you for your time in regarding our application for a music and festival permit. Chesterfield Berry Farm, located at 20501 Skinquarter Rd., Moseley, Virginia, is both the applicant and event promoter. We will receive all net proceeds from our music and our Festival series except for our St. Judes Weekend in which some of the proceeds will go to the charity. We plan to have family oriented outdoor music during our pumpkin season on the lawns of Chesterfield Berry Farm which is located at 26002 Pear Orchard Rd. Moseley, Virginia. The music will be held on Saturdays and Sundays from September 22, 2007 thru October 31,2007. We also plan to have a Pumpkin Festival on October 13 and 14, 2007. The Pumpkin Festival and music series is to help promote our pick your own pumpkins. Chesterfield Berry Farm opens at 9:00am with music beginning at 11 :OOam. Music will end at 4:00pm and all other activities will end at 6:00pm. Chesterfield Berry Farm is assuming full fmancial responsibility for the Festival and music series. We are currently seeking corporate sponsors to help offset some of,our major costs. We are currently in the process of acquiring a band for our Pumpkin Festival Weekend. Nick's Karaoke will be playing music all other Festivals. We will not be charging admission for music on Saturdays and Sundays. We anticipate having 3000 people on the farm during the Festival hours. We have existing portolets at Chesterfield Berry Farm and they will remain there throughout our Pumpkin season. They are serviced twice a week by Nes services. Chesterfield Berry Farm currently has clean-up and trash disposal. We have dumpsters located on the farm and Tranium picks up the trash twice a week. Lodging will not be a necessity for our Festivals. Chesterfield Berry Farm has facilities where food, water, and soft drinks will be available for purchase during hours of operation. 000060 We are alerting the Manchester Rescue Squad and Clover Hill Fire department of our event's dates and times. We will work with our security officers in the event of an emergency to notify the proper emergency medical personnel. Adequate parking will be available in the Chesterfield Berry Farm parking lot with any overflow parking in our fields next to parking area. Outdoor lighting will not be used during our events as our events occur during day hours. Music both live and taped will be played in such a manner that the sound will not be a nuisance to adjacent property owners. Heavy evergreen buffers are already in place between Chesterfield Berry Farm property and adjacent property owners. All sound issues are under direct control of Shannon Mangnuson (General Retail Manager) with Chesterfield Berry Farm. We have an agreement in place with the Chesterfield County Police Department to employ off-duty police officers who will assist our staff with parking, crowd control and all other security components of our Festival and music series. Chesterfield Berry Farm carries a general $2 million liability insurance policy to insure against injury or damage. Statements authorizing Chesterfield County principals to enter the property during our music series or Festival are attached herewith. Our application fee is attached. I trust that the above information is adequate to meet the county's requirements for approval of our Entertainment Festival permit. Please call with any questions or concerns. Thank you for your assistance. Sincerely, ~..' Shannon Mangnuson General Retail Manager 000061. August 6, 2007 Chesterfield Berry Farm authorizes Chesterfield County principals to enter the property before or during our~"~J season. l) N\ ptL\\ () ~~ Aaron Goode President _. ,..., - ~ OUUUb~ U-~ ~~ I ... _ il -- . I jJ .~-1:~ ~. CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 2 Meeting Date: August 22, 2007 Item Number: 8.C.5. Subiect: Consideration of Increasing the Motorola, Incorporated Contract purchase Order, and Transfer Appropriations from Various Departments County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Qj () Board Action Reauested: Authorize County Administrator to approve Change Order 14 to increase the Motorola contract purchase order (#685506) by $175,802 and transfer $160,092 in appropriations from current year operating department sources. Summary of Information: An increase in the Motorola purchase order is requested in order to purchase additional CAD 'workstation client licenses, mobile computer applications licenses and associated mounting hardware for Emergency Communications, Fire and Police. The increase in the purchase order will allow the county to obtain favorable pricing already established as a result of the original project and equip new positions and activities already funded in the FY08 adopted budget. Preparer: Stephen E. Davis Title: DeS Proiect ManaQer Attachments: DYes .NO # .- 000063 6-~, ._~iJ CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 2 of 2 Meeting Date: August 22, 2007 Budaet and Manaaement Comments: This item requests the Board to approve a change order for Motorola, Inc. in the amount of $175,802 for additions to the CADs system in the Police, ECC and Fire Departments. In addition, the item requests the transfer of funds to the project to cover the additional costs. The execution of this change order is a result of planned increases in staffing and funding that has been made a part of the FY2008 budget. The change order also allows the county to obtain favorable contract prices from Motorola. There are sufficient appropriations in the FY2008 budget of the departments affected as well as in the CADs capital project to fund the improvements. Preparer: Allan Carmody Title: Director. Budaet and Manaaement 000064 ti)- .~--~: , ~ ~~~ CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 1 of 1 AGENDA Meeting Date: August 22, 2007 Item Number: 8.C.6. Subiect: Independent Evaluation of County Practices and Procedures Request for Proposal County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Q)) Board Action ReQUest~: Approval to proceed with an independent evaluation request for proposal. Summary of Information: The Board of Supervisors approval is requested to proceed with advertising a Request for Proposal (RFP) for an independent evaluation of county management practices and procedures, contracting procedures and processes, and to identify opportuni ties and make recommendations to make the county more efficient in spending taxpayers' money. Staff was asked to prepare a timeline for completing such an analysis concurrent wi th the change in leadership, and in time to be available as soon as feasible for the Board's review in 2008. A description of a timeline, scope of work, and anticipated outcomes is attached. Preparer: Lou Lassiter Title: Internal Audit Director Attachments: . Yes DNO 0000651 I TIMELINE August 22, 2007 BOS approval with ability to proceed with RFP September 7, 2007 RFP on street October 10, 2007 Responses to RFP due November 14,2007 Contract Award November 15, 2007 - February 15, 2008 Field Work February 28, 2008 Final Report Due KEY OBJECTIVE Perform an evaluation of county's management practices and procedures, contracting procedures and processes, and identify opportunities and make recommendations to make the county more efficient in spending taxpayer's money. SCOPE OF WORK 1. County Management practices and procedures - Compile information, present conclusions and make recommendations for improvement as needed for the following areas: Conduct general review of major organization wide county management practices and procedures to identify gaps and opportunities for improvement. Use State APA FY06 Comparative cost information to benchmark the costs of services provided by Chesterfield on a per capita/student basis to other Virginia Local Governments with populations over 100,000. Identify service areas that are higher cost than the average that provide opportunity for cost savings. 2. Contracting practices and procedures - Compile information, present conclusions and make recommendations for improvement as needed for the following areas: Review current contractual procurement, policies and procedures of the County and School System for compliance with Virginia Procurement Act. Determine if current procurement practices are designed to achieve the best value in spending taxpayer money while maintaining compliance, efficiency and effectiveness in the procurement process. Identify innovative approaches to public procurement that are permitted in Virginia that are not being used by Chesterfield County/Chesterfield County Public Schools. 3. Cost saving and efficiency - Compile information, present conclusions and make recommendations for improvement as needed for the following areas: Identify further efficiency opportunities for the County which have been implemented by other local governments and proven to save taxpayer resources while maintaining a high level of service. Specific opportunities presented should have documented costs projections verifying how they can be performed at a lower cost than currently provided by the County. 000066 Expected Outcomes List of improvements or gaps in major organization wide practices and procedures. Independent assessment of the cost of services compared to other Virginia Local Governments of similar size and a list of areas where cost savings may be needed. ConfIrmation that contractual procurement policies, procedures and practices are in compliance with the Code of Virginia. Identification of procurement practices that could save taxpayer resources or be innovative in their approach. List of other opportunities that could be implemented to save taxpayer resources. 000-06.7 . ,~y,.~ CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Meeting Date: August 22,2007 Item Number: 8.C.7. Subiect: State Road Acceptance County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: a1 Board Action ReqUest" Summary of Information: Bermuda: Matoaca: Walthall Ridge Fox Club Parkway and Village Square Parkway Preparer: Richard M. McElfish Attachments: I OQQ.Q68 , I Title: Director, Environmental Enaineerina II Yes DNa # ~ ..- i~ ~ . I I ; ~ . ~ ..-, - ..-a.;- . 1.._: Lr" 1Iig:j . ~.... .. . ~ .. '.. : .., .. L-' .. --:, -- ..- ..~~ ..:1:- ,or ~~~~r1 a -..: I ~~ l. .. ......... ' .... ~ - . _ :.5 r;il'i'" !..3 ,~~ ~~IM ~.Ir:-... , ..:-- w. ..~ - ~-i1 ~, ~ -..;::i I II "'IIQ ~I -- 'r- ~~.;-; - ~ ) ; - C'i'*' ~ ., .,~ '.-,:II~' ':"Jt:'-- L ~ 'f -", !!! ,.i I. :or.) WI - ~ iIIL - 7\ .~.. ~ ....;:!:..I ,. "1l ,_ ':w"~~ r.-- ~:s-.~ ~:':~ " "- f" / f..o oC: .. ~ ......, "I",;' h ...y.~ a f':"'! .. ~ ~~ :c:t :i :JIO.l "fI' Pl-, ,~_~.. ......-'- I.... ~ ~~ ~ '7-':'~ II. ... ~ ~~ ~ _ ~ "I9r ~ .'iit"S:) ~~ ';;. - .J' .. ',I'll .... P'" ~I ,. _..0- !;-.: I~~ ___ "" '(.L- .... ,rlII 1::. '- ~ ~::!i IJ :t.1f IIfS - ~ .... '- :. ~ ~'. 1"'_ ~ ~ -...: ~~ I I. ~~ 1-.11: .. , . ri"thI ; ~ -=-: "'II ~ ~ ...:H-- ~ , -..:5 I...F: ... 1"..1'" c" ..' i l co '(~, 'r t . -'"" ..-"<' - ~,.., . ~ :::;;: --=' " Er.:' ~ '" i ~ ._ ~ ....":.:. _ ........' .-. I ~ - . , 'D:I< cor ..... ~ ::'i ': '..;:F:' ... -- . ~ -.... ---.... .I. ~ ~ " I ~ [J ~ "~ . ....~:: ;.'::="~~"; :.dT:; ~ ~ ~v, t' . ':. ~ i" ~.... .... .....J"I L~ '... ..~.., .;,;.' ~..:. f:"~')' ~ V:- ~ ~.. Sla t __ . .;:~~-=--~ '... ~ ..:-i k*N~"5~iJ.~ --:r;;r'-tr~~":I 0;0\ iii .~ ~"-- ~ :. ~ j.r:.r:. ~ ~ ~ :-- ~ T-O:,,- ": ;;. - L.. ~. · ~~.~ ,~. ;.'" .,. ~ IJ:OJ ':: ~ . .....OtP;Ir, I"~ _ .":'-. -,.:-:: ~~ I L ~ ~ "ow __ _'~ .~ ~.... _ ~ ~~ _T .... l~ .,0,1- ~ ..:~ ' ~,~ ,.. _ ,_. .. oIJ~-~ .. _ f":.::r'" -: -.....~ I" ,.... -0; .'~ i~+~~ '....- ~~ ' -'~~ 9if~jl~9f:.~ 6-i:-~:-: . · ". ~N1~r~ -r- _ _ ...... ~ -:.:.. ..i . ~ - ... · ~ '. PJ" '. ..,.:j';.::: ~~. ~ -- . ~ i;:i." ....-- ~ 'iI ,.. ,....:1 ..' 1'01 .. .,..;:u ..,' ~ · 't....., · "'-":I-:,p ~ \ ~. '. j.. \,1- .~~"~~"-F"'~ ~H/~~ :11T:~1 ~ !~~ ~-~~~~. :::'~"~...i~~ i_~:J:"~~. .J,fJj'. .... _ \I .,..~~ lor> :i ElL -.; . ~~I jl.I, , ~ -;-= -.,..:.. ~ ~. :;-J....1i ~ ~~. :.,~ '-'. .. ~ '~~!l!lI" .. ~ ._~~~~~~fi. ;.!~:..'" .~ ..-,~ f' "I L ~ ~. _ - ...,.-... ,":'" '""". · -.r: t:z..... .:" if""' (.IrJ J.l': :.... ......~ ~ . .. ...... . ~ _ _~ ... .. Po ~ .~ .1.... ."..... r. ~ f"i I, i ~ :~'::'~ ~:~._" .. . ~.~ ~, ~Si~~ ~ ":o/!?r~ t::.it*~ ~ ...~8 ~~' ~); · : &, , ;:. ":...i-; - ,::) '-:; ~ '-r-<m ~ · ..;.:.. ,r 1::-'. =:' ~:; · ;~- ~~~ ~ JI 1. ,: !'I'" ~ ~ . j ~;f::i'l I iiJ -'~:-II h ~ -.;-- ~~ iii ~'y'",:~ ~ II! . ": ~ ~ ...... C'; L"j ~ · ...".... .' L-o : ~ ~ ... ll' . .... ,e ~n~~:';S.!JI 'J' =.Y,:. j, :..~) ;.__ . .~_ k ~ '-'~ -. ~v,t!i~~ ~.~ ~~~ IIJ_::.': ,.... '!r ,L\:':!:. ~ ~ '!: I ~I: ~ ...r .' .- rl'~ ~ ~.I r. :-::"): ~. v. - ...~. _ -: I~.( h:"~M~ ~ ~,I'" ,-" 7..:fi': ,.,:'.~ · '" ,t: ~ ;r;~~1.: L; ~r....U' ...r-- ' r~' .......,,~.. 1.L'~" '.--=' ~ ....- · :-~~~"'"--w. ~ 'f ..' ~ ~ '..... . -- -..~.., _L --f.('" .' ~ ~ 'x ~'.:'i" · . v..~..." :': r.... 'C F.i: ~ ~ . r:'~~:- ".....:)e.~ ..- ~-!: 1.% ~ .'-:"'T ~ ,I;.:!'i9, l.~: ~ - -. ..~' - -"II: -. .... ~~~ ~ · _ . . ~ ~ II ...~ ~ L ~ _ - ~ 'JII:r: ;a..;;...~':;.<.: J ~ ~ · 0': .. ~=-:'~ rv: ;:n.:." .::rt:.~ -: );,~...-;i ) , ~fl. ~f~~~~~ ,,"~fi! -' "\~B:.' ~"":. ~~~ ~ ~":I · .)~ \: ...... I';" ~:-... ::~~ --. ~ ~ .._~ ,.: ~ ~':tl" ~ \. '.~ )~~ ~,~ ' ::ii _.. =-- · ~.~~: :? ~ '. I-; ~~.. ; ~ ~-=-.M. -. - , .' . ~,~ _' ~ _ ~ ... .. 0'1 y~::I.-... -F ~ ~ ~~~~. rr .-1... "':-= ... · .... - · -i -.,!' J: ~: ~ ~ ~... ~ ~~~'.. .;. ';'.;i~~ ~ II.i .... .~;~_ . ~- _-.;i' :.r" "~ . '. ',' .1~:_l;.l,~,~. .~~. ..' :.1..' ~...~.... ~ .::! · '~I~ ~t ~ '~.-.E . '_..a' ~.... .i;-..... ~ -0':.... : 11 If' -.. ' .. '..r; : ' I"i"'. ~ . ~ 7.: · .,,:.-: · ~ < .... 'r." , '.J ~ ..." :".'" · · ~ ~ ~~.. 1,,":.. W" ~,.._'~ ~~ C.3oL It: ~ '-r:.1Io , ':'iIt..,,(' )...~'.i.. · -;~ '?~..tj!' -' -: \~~. ... r~ ':':;. · ~.~ . . ~ ~ . I:;i; I J~ W _ :: ~_.... _ :".... ~ · "'-, ~~~ · · "';-:.- ~','" ~. : ": .....~' ~.,::~ J .. ~ .~;t .::,' ~-:;:r: ~~~r;. J.:.::.;'tr. · .' ~ - .;- ~.. - ~ ~ ~ ~ · ~. ... ~:' · .. - ---= ~ ~ .~. ~.' ~ .:ij .... . ~: ,~. ~ ~ 'ili""'- ~ j -.'r\. t, ~ ) \f ....... AP '.~ ':..-:Ir.' .' r -', ..,;p.... -!. Ii: · ,\, ~ - .1 ....; .!.' : ~ ........ ~ ~. . ~ ~ '..-5\ =--..::' .........' .... ~ ~ · 1\0 :I: i!.S · ': .,....,.r.... - : .':' " I{i: . _ '1i' ...i.,~.. :1i[:.. : .;/~~..r~;:: ~~~ir-' ~~ ~-~F:~~~~'~~~-pt; · · )r:..,' .~"I:.";~ ~ J '"...~.;-;t .. ~. _ (.-'J" ';::r-r 0:' . :: :~~~ ~:'-: . : r.... ~ .,;-=::' .,7'1 ~ -: ~~ ~ ~ ~...~ ~-; ~I : - x.-::;':- :: ~.~ J" -... ~t:. ... .... ___ _...;. I ..... . ':L' ~ +rf' .' ..... L..r"'!:. · jr'f-..... : : ,'I . ~ ~.' : I . _... ~. .- ,," ~~~ ~~. · :~.:.-:,' ~~:,:r.31 ' .--=~......,...;..c . ,p' ...- .. . . .,. ~ " .' ...... ~ ... .., , - - ): ..~. '.:' ....' . :;~- , ~ """='.. . ~ ... ..., 'tf!r..' ~:-.: ~ - '.... · ~. ... ~ ~ ... . . ).;. ft. · ~ -. . ._. :.......... v':K " · ; · ~'!' :-~;~). J:. '- ... .' ...~. j .;: ": ..- .F -: ~... ~ i · - ~ . ..~. ~'\ TO: Board of Supervisors FROM: Department of Environmental Engineering SUBJECT: State Road Acceptance - Fox Club Pkwy and Village Square Pkwy DISTRICT: MATOACA MEETING DATE: August 22,2007 ROADS FOR CONSIDERATION: FOX CLUB PKWY AND VILLAGE SQUARE PKWY Vicinity Map: Fox Club Pkwy and Village Square Pkwy \j\LLAGE: SQ UA.R/2 ,t:)f'; ~J- coseY RO I I ~ ~\..~\J ~\.f\ ~ ~\,: o"V :<:-0 C:JU Q 00 ~ ~ 'V "v ~ >- 1. DOGWOOD VILLAS DR ~ 2. DOGWOOD PARK DR a.. OJ .:J -J U ~ ~~W/~ Prod uced By Chesterfield County GIS 000070 U--<~ I 'I ,_ n -~ CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 2 Meeting Date: August 22, 2007 Item Number: 8.C.8.a. Subiect: Award of Construction Contract for County Project # 05-0301, Belleau Drive Route 789 Water Line Replacement County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: (Jj Board Action ReauestedV' The Board of Supervisors is requested to award the construction contract to Southern Construction Utilities, Inc. in the amount of $260,507.33 and authorize the County Administrator to execute the necessary documents. Summary of Information: This proj ect consists of construction of approximately 2,925 feet of 8-inch and 555 feet of 6-inch water lines and associated appurtenances. Staff received eight (8) bids ranging from $260,507.33 to $789,999.75. Southern Construction Utilities, Inc. submitted the lowest bid in the amount of $260,507.33. The County's engineering consultant, R. Stuart Royer & Associates, has evaluated the bids and recommends award of the contract to the low bidder. Funds are available in the current CIP. District: Midlothian Preparer: Georae B. Haves P.E. Title: Assistant Director of Utilities Attachments: DYes .NO ,~ # 000071 8jju; ,I . ~.fj _ __. ~ ] -~ ~~ CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 2 of 2 Meeting Date: August 22,2007 Budaet and Manaaement Comments: This item requests that the Board award a construction contract to Southern Construction Utilities, Inc. in the amount of $260,507.33 and authorize the County Administrator to execute the necessary documents. Sufficient funds are available in the Belleau Drive project budget to cover the cost of the construction contract. Preparer: Allan M~ Carmody Title: Director. Budaet and Manaaement 000072 ~~ - CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 2 Meeting Date: August 22,2007 Item Number: 8.C.8.b. Su biect: Award of Construction Contract for County Project Number 04-0162 - Ironwood Road Special Tax and/or Assessment Water and Sewer District County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Reauested: Staff recommends Board of Supervisors award construction contract for the Ironwood Road Special Tax and/or Assessment Water and Sewer District to R. M. C. Contractors, Inc. in the amount of $117,516; and authorize County Administrator to execute any necessary documents. Summary of Information: This project includes 575 L.F. of 6" water line, 1,240 L.F. of 8" sewer line, 340 L.F. of 6" sewer line for laterals and will provide water and sewer service to properties along Ironwood Road. The bids have been reviewed and it is recommended to award to the lowest bidder R. M. C. Contractors, Inc. Preparer: William O. WriQht Title: Assistant Director of Utilities Attachments: . Yes DNO # 00007 .-~ ,I , ~I " -- - kl :., -= If ~!G..!" CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 2 of 2 Meeting Date: August 22,2007 Budaet and Manaaement Comments: This item requests that the Board award a construction contract to R.M.C. Contractors, Inc. in the amount of $117, 516 and authorize the County Administrator to execute the necessary documents. Sufficient funds are available in the Ironwood Road water and sewer assessment districts budgets to cover the cost of the construction contract. Pre parer: Allan M. Carmody Title: Director. Budaet and Manaaement 000074 0 N 0 0 0 'n ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ \0 t.r) M ~ N 00 1""""'< 0\ t"- ~ ~ 0\ Q'\, 'n 0 ~ \0"" 00 ~ N II) t"-"" 0"" 00"" 00 0"" N \C II) ..... M t.r) lr) 00 ~ ~ 0"\ = I .- ~ .- ~ ~ N I QO ~ ~ ~ Qt"7 Qt"7 Qt"7 ~ "'l!!t = In ~ i.: N I ~ l""-- "Q = 5 ~ ~ = "'0 "0 ""0 "0 "'0 Z (J c:: $:: ~ c:: c ~ Q) 0 0 0 0 0 ...... = ...c .D ...0 ...0 ...0 ..c ~ ~ u ~ c;n"" 00"" 00"" 1:J:l"" CI:I "" tI.l"" . ...., 0 ~ Q) Q.) Q) Q) Cl) Cl) I- Z ~ ~ >- >- > > ~ >-:. Q ...... ~ = == = = U E--t Ji:1 tI1 = t1J Z 0 H E-t j =' M 0 t"- M lr) ...... ~ t"'-- \0 ~ 0 ......... N ["--. I( 0'\ """" \0 0 ...... 00 ~ 0'\ t"- M E-t ~ V) M \0 ..... 0 0 ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ V) .- lr; ..... ~ U 0 0 0 0 ..... 0 0 E-t )loiiiiiii t"'-- t'-- ["--. t"- t'-- r- ~ =: N N N N N N ~ 00 0 'i'-'l U Q ~ ~ Z ~ ~ rz:I ~ H r.I'1 J%.f rJ:1 ~ ~ IZ1 rJ:1 E-i 00. t1J -< rz:r ~ = ~ U ~ ~ rJ:1 Q Z -< " ~ ~ ~ ~ < ~ = ~ Q N -< @ 0 l""-- U " = C 1--4 Q = tr.!"" N 0 ~.... u .~ 0 ~ c:: ::= ~ 1--4 .p ...... u c:ili i;'-I c:: ~ Z = 1--4 t:: .s 0 '=IJ .9 t:: = 00"" ..... .9 " ~ u u U < cj toe ..... .... 0 :s ~ u t:: ..... t:: ~ 1--4 U .b 1--4 t:: :s ~ ~ ;.... tI.l c:"" 0 ........ .u QJi ~ ..... t:: U U"J e c 0 0 t:: ~ = 0 U r:/'J Q.) 0 <<: .S U ~ U ...... Z t:: o(! r/'J ...... QJi rj 0 t:: ~ ~ tI.l ;>. ~ "- ~ 0 t:: Q) Q.) ~ ~ :.g tI.l :> ....t:: "'0 . .." "'0 ....... - 0 ~ - ;::3 Cl:I '- = ~ Cl) 0 d 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ rJ) 000075 .~I ~ CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Meeting Date: August 22,2007 Item Number: Se',9.a. Subiect: Acceptance of a Parcel of Land Along the North Right of Way Line of Midlothian Turnpike from Westchester Office Partners, LLC County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Cl1 Board Action ReQUe~ Accept the conveyance of a parcel of land containing 0.019 acres from Westchester Office Partners, LLC, and authorize the County Administrator to execute the deed. Summary of Information: Staff requests that the Board of Supervisors accept the conveyance of a parcel of land containing 0.019 acres along the north right of way line of Midlothian Turnpike from Westchester Office Partners, LLC. This dedication is for the development of Shoppes at Westchester Phase 1. Approval is recommended. District: Midlothian Pre parer: John W. Harmon Title: RiQht of Way Manaaer Attachments: . Yes DNO 000078 ~I illl~ I II I ,. I I I I ~ fa If l H - ii ! JII~, full bl, Mil I i l "'" '1'- ..,.,., ~ ~ 'tt..;;;"" .r:=:~ Ii ~ ~ ~ ~..!~ mlI'fD:) 3Hl 1211 _lOD7.31l tla! ~ .IMl:I!Q7ta' i .. -.!. ~';'" J(J Jin HI." 3HJ. N'J tJ.WC1 f1Nn A ~ "'j.~'~ IIEl ~ ~ ! lli ~ ~ a ~~*. :MnrJtU SB'1IWi:I ~ ~ J1fII '3 ! I il ~ ~ ~ 1'-.)'- I~ !I.. :~Il !~;l 3 ~ @. \! I r~ i f!1 "~I ;~ I~! ;11 ~ a ~ i i~ ~ 0 ,~~~ 1~~;lil 0 " ;:., ...~ -- 03~ ~~ ~~ :& ~ _i!Ui;1 ~ -- ~ C e (.) (/) ,Ll"'I~t ~IIC"" ~ !I!III:~ IiI g~ I I l! , l$ i I' ~ !~: I! I 121~11~ .i ~ .. ~ /", ""~~ ~ ...,. ~,~~ ~~~ ~o)',., ..q;,- II J , , I , J , ' I I' I . l i I tff" ,1= ~ ~. ~..~.'.!..".:.-.~.:.~ ~~ I~! 'I! ~f::\j . Ji .. q: '1'- ~i'l ~ ~~.~;;~ ~~I~I }(11\ ~nlh lid, ~ III '::'.~."..-.'A..."".;\..'. ..\ t t/'\-"I \ ~ .. . ',r'i L . I~ \"">f.' ~ ~ spa ~\'~.~.. :::..,.1. A.... \ ~ "/"','.:\\ ~ , -r', . ,"" ).-\ l ~'U:,\ - t::;'I"~-~ ..,,4\_ "\,\, H6SYJ1~'F L~1.. -.iI.".. "~1. -:,:.\ ~ ~/~":;~;\ ~. ~*'ll I; ~ ~~~n. iK.'......'.:.'..:.t:.1..J.:1.. ~~~Irto ~...t'l, ~~~.~., H..<..._...'........I_.).' ~~ _ .~~ 1t~: .il:) 3 ::It' .(.....N:,::,~',J .:--..;.... ":'--:..1 lU I ~ I,f...r! .. · J I ~'f,---,:-'fJ ~ I J! ~ ~ I II t:l;:::rJ ~ II;J ii !}l g:t! .fl. J"'.'.;..'.<.':'-:.'.'.:~.'.~...Iltd ~ ~ ~l fll II ~~":>l~ 1<11 El~I" i. ;[ii,f ~" il!! {~.. J. ....i.:./J.~' 4.. / "" i 1m t. ~~.~...;l~;t9 tlJ Ii <''tJ I i l'PJ;, .I_h -~~ ~.J!~i7> i~! ~ ....~...>f.:...-~,..11 R~ ~ t! ';~?&/ ~b~ ~ - 1. ~ I r ~, I I ~ .t' f I ~ ;u 000080 B,--~ \-_~:l , ~~l!) CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Meeting Date: August 22,2007 Item Number: 8.C.9.b. Subiect: Acceptance of Parcels of Land for Watkins Centre Parkway and Along Midlothian Turnpike from BEP Limited Partnership County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: ~ Board Action ReqUeste~ Accept the conveyance of three parcels of land containing a total of 1.874 acres from BEP Limited Partnership, and authorize the County Administrator to execute the deed. Summary of Information: Staff requests that the Board of Supervisors accept the conveyance of five parcels of land containing a total of 1.874 acres for Watkins Centre Parkway and along Midlothian Turnpike from BEP Limited Partnership. This dedication is for the development of Shoppes at Westchester Phase 1. Approval is recommended. District: Midlothian Preparer: John W. Harmon Title: Riaht of Way Manaaer Attachments: . Yes DNO # 00008:1 ~ 'M · ~ ~....-:.. ...:.. '~I...: 'I .... ..... . .~ ~. . ... a=;~ ~~ ! ~~.I. ~ ~ . J 1t-~. ~ ~~. - -i--:. "': .. :. -=..1 ~I. :.. ~ ~ . ..-: t · Io'i ~...~ ~ ~ ~~ .~ ~~ ~ 'I _~ .__ .. I .iii :iI! I' ~ ~;i~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ , I~~ I ~F.~t.~ ,~ ~ .. ~.. -+- ~ . L ; 9 ~J;fI.....:I:oJ j'. " · ~ ~ ...."t :r:... =-' __~ I. ~ ~~ ~ n~ .. ~:I. ..~M ~. .ffi .~~~ ~~~~..I~ ,rl?~ ~ . ... .:. ~ II'}.. ~ : '-" . .... J...... . . · ",.. ..... ~ ........... -: .. ---= ~ . ~ : · ~ .~.: ..... .... rI' -. .. l"r .- .. ~ · .au-..... · ~~_.I (g ............... ~ -. ..~.. ....r- ~(:to ... . ILl n-:i:I ~ ~i I ~..~ 1I'.n~ =i ' ~i;.. ;.. ~ -= .~ ...- . ..... _II ~. 'I ~ j --= ..... r L I. j ~ =;t:~ .~'':: L ~ -. -. -" ~ :...:.. ~.. ....... ..... -..- rc.. ..,~.- r( -. - - ::-.. ..~ . T ....r _~ II': rf.1)..~} I ...., -.~. ~ ~. :.....r-r1- ~ .3) ai~~~; ~~:rI~~~;;.?-.~ ~~;1~m;~ ..~..i L-. ~\:~ ~~~Y-!j~R -ri~ 'l-,..~~.\ , jl1:.~.. :~~~ ~~~i'~W.' -~.j") -f :.r~i;"'...~--. .~:::~.~ · -. -~?j ,..... ~ .: · : .-..... I..-.r.:.. .. :.0.... i 7;61 ~ · ~ J;i... ~ 'ifl . I... '-:... I~ 1 ~ k:l~ ~.: fr. f. ..~. ....r .1 -":"::f;: 'If . _ 1 : -=.. .1 -: "'..1:-': ..-:.. ~ · .. _ =-= _.....1 :- ~ : 1"1":.1 ~ :II.. ~,- oj '-:-. ~ ....' --=- ...... ~ ..lrIi ~....' .:: -...:: .. 1 :... I" .~. 1 "':-:'.: .,... .. · J.:.: .. .1 ~I' 1111, Ji II Ii! 1 ~ ii I111 III! 11111 1111 Mil. - ~ ~; ~ f.t:: ~ fl ~&l'" i fS ~lr)jt ~ a:: "' -....;.. 4f~"C) ~ I ~ ~i~~ o~~~ ~~~~ ~ ~ '1; -~ i 1~ <~ ~~ ~ ,.: s. VIN/t)HIA '/.LNfKX) 073l:RI3J.S3H:) .J.~SIO !MHJ.07OJlt- lTBI:IlI!JJ1DH: ./Q _ . .IJNf1()f) 3Hl Ql tmM3lO:iO is Qi iJIt:/N'iJIU JMH./J1'1t1Iff .:10 !INI1 HJJJON 3HJ. NO tJNU.7 /JfN7 .I) satW' ,,'d'Z 9NIW.l.OJ S73fJWrJ 3AU DNIMOH$ Jr1d I',.' i ~.~ H i J;I!I ~" .t'....~ _ *o~.IJ- - 'Qb~_ ~.~ 'II.~ .tG?P. ~~ a"?>~ ~~ w;: ~'Vfi" ~ ..(~< .~ ~~ ~....., ~ ~ b~ S1 h~). . ~ ~~~~ul ~~U~~I ~i ~~~ S~~hh_ i!:1~~ . _ M,~~=:~~ I It t )rI1-- ~ It ~!III~~ ~ - · ~\1~ .~3dii:::;~::: I... ,_ I I~!t ~ i ~ ~ ;5 ~~. !!~ ~ ~~~' ~~ i~~ ~~ />t 1\ - ~ 4j ~ ~ ~ - S $t::~ (,i~~~ ~ ~~~-l~ ~ ~ ~ 1/~\rJn~~ i- &;~l', l/.., \ ! ct .!t- ~ (J ;', r1 .r::- v \ I~~ ~~ \ ~ ~ ,./\. \ ~. \ _ 111 , ~~- ?:. \ \'" ~-Q/1:" \ ~.> ....~ \ ~ vw'" \) N8S:O;;34"E ~ I _ fJ6.2tf.' ~~~I ~ I~~PJ. ~ '. ~~. n~~~~l . ". ....~! ,t~-t~,,~ ~~.. ... ... .... l.!'" m ~ ~ ~ I h ~ -"""'- :r...~ ~~... (I' x S _'~'W2sg,15' .~~~~ ~~ ~<-::~~~':r ~e ~~,.f;: ~~ %,~ ~~t. ~~ . ~ 3 ~I '~,,--4<, ~~ :~ ij, ~ ~ y'~i~~~ r~~' ~ I .%.~ ~~~r ~ ~~ ~5 ~ ~ lh~i-", ~ ~~ . ~~ ~ ..' ',/}~'~tl_; ~~ ~~ i~ ~r~~~~ I~ '->~I I~~~ ;,]!!;1~fl: -_\f~~~""#~~ZJA_~ . riff ~ff ~,.~ .. . . .. ~.. o;~~!lli-- Y ........- 7~.(~~' ~ij ~~;;" I.,' ~~.'if .~~~~ i~' 'r' . I />cz,,--/ 0:'5' <it ~~~$ ~'" ... ...... ~ "tt!~ t -" .....LtO \ir"::~ , ~~ R ~ ~~ ,"8 ~..I ~ ... -....~ . ..../ ~ " ;::~ ~l (ti~ ~ ;,(,1) tc)OJ S 8 ~S~!'l~~ ,,"~l ~~ -" ~I~' ..;;~. '~l~ '!iJtU'''~~~;:~~~-'-'?%;~ '-'-~""'i~"'~ . ~tJ . ..<>>~ ~~. 5! rJ. " <ot;O'C2 ~_..... _'''-./ ~~ I ~ ~~ . ~ct: ~ / ~~ J /) / ~~~~:!i'!3S~~~~~~~~ I UI~~ ~ ~ . ~ !i I~ III :!; ~ ~ <::i ~1i:S <::i ..; ~ lti ii!iiiii ~ .LC"'i'lr ~80.WN o :.; ~~~~ ~rg~~ ti. ~~~!ia-e 1~~t5 ~~ ~~t ~f9S ,,~ ..... Q:~~~ i~ ~ b , lILt -~ \i; i o$@1: / C"; ~<".t;~ r.".p4'" . ~oS' <".9.t ij II' '-> f;j ~ '. ~ ~ . ....~'u ...:- ~. :h~l~ ~ ~ ~!~~ .. ~ ~ ~~i. ~l,' ~ JI:' III ~~' ~ ~~ ~~~ ~~. '\ i~~~ ~~ ~~~ h~ 7to~ ~~ I~ ! ,. .~,..~ ~ ~~ <'" . ~ :i ~ i .. .' , ~J ~ - ~~~~~ ~~~~'~ ~~:d ~~~~.. . !:!~- ,. . ~ ~ ~I~ ~ ~ 1:; tj l:l t ~I~ ~ !:i ~ ~ ~ ~I~~ i.~ ~I~ ~Il " ~~I~IN ~ ~ ....'L... 'b~:l!il"'o::l 'IIl_...._ ~...... ~.. 1:: bi"t:; - ~ ~ ~i ~ ~~ tt~t~ tli.~~ ~~i IttI 'fr\D,~I~tr5~ ~ ~~ . ~1~il~~:~;~II~jll;:~;.;I~;!;~ ~~ I~~~~~~ ~k'l~ I~ i~~I~ ~~~ ~I~t~_~ ~I~~:~I~:I:!~I~~~~I~ . ~1~S8,~ ~~;~I~~ " a~ I~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~'_ ,11111; ~ _, ~ ~ ~ I~~- I~ .I~~I~ ~. ~~~ . ~ ~I~I" ~i~ ~ ~ ~R:l~ 2 I~~~,~:~~I~~I~I~~~;~I~~_~I~~I~~ 5~~o~~~~~~~5~~a~~~~S85aa ~ <'" 't--.. ~ .s ;~. ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ L_ ;8 8 I") ~ 0 0 ,..... II 0 ~ :. ~ (]) a 01_ ~ . I. ./ ; ~I I I I I. I I I I / I I /- I f ~l. .'.-- --.... .- ..-'.._- -.to\i:' _....'... ~~~~ -. ::1~i~ i~~O :s ,I ~ ~~ - ~.........o. fJ.~ ~ ~ il!~t5' 00008-3 .~~ , ,:', 'j,~ !1~~2) CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Meeting Date: August 22,2007 Item Number: 8.C.9.c. Subiect: Acceptance of a Parcel of Land Along the North Right of Way Line of Midlothian Turnpike from Branch Banking and Trust Company of Virginia County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: ~ Board Action Reauested: Accept the conveyance of a parcel of land containing 0.121 acres from Branch Banking and Trust Company of Virginia, and authorize the County Administrator to execute the deed. Summary of Information: Staff requests that the Board of Supervisors accept the conveyance of a parcel of land containing 0.121 acres along the north right of way line of Midlothian Turnpike from Branch Banking and Trust Company of Virginia. This dedication is for the development of Shoppes at Westchester Phase 1. Approval is recommended. District: Midlothian Preparer: John W. Harmon Title: Riaht of Way Manaaer Attachments: . Yes DNO 000084 ~~ r~ I:"f'" ......:!II-.... :II ~ ~ ~ '~1 - ~ -. ,... -.cr. ~ , · ,.. ~ ! ~ .1 I ~ .;:..~ ~ 11- r..B'I:- ~.. ~ :. a-... ~ : ~ (~~ ,li :.r:_. "'II: -fl:~~I) · .~ =-t-" L.........~ .Jt" .. .~ ...... -....:::1.... .......-..:::: ... I=- ~ - . .. ----- -_:~ ~ ~ N:i~ ~!II ~ -~--i ~ ? ~ . 4 jI-:. IJ ~ ~ ~ ~ J~ ~ ~ L ....~ .ill :- ~ 1:1 .. ~ J.. . ':J~ :.... ... LI.M:. . ~ . · · ~ ~~t ., -..... .. ... ~I -..... 11 --'1E .. r ' . .~...... ..: . ~ 'J. 1 I ~ .. -l:.:~ . ,'t.! · ;at' iii III J ( "'J · ,,,!- :~ .:.... .~ 111.1 ~ ..... · .. t r~ ~ :~ ~~ c .~i1 ~~ - .. ~ ~" - ..-.. .... ~ , :-"II KI"'""':-" , . I j}~ ~I ~ ii::.. · ( I ~~~ i .::: 1 =01 ~~... .." ~~ ..::I ~:i": ~ ... ~ ...L · ~ ~ .::. L · r. - ..... - J J...r.. ~ .. i.; ~ ~\ ?;;...... ~ ~ :J!. it . ~ ~ ~ .~ IIIIL :.:;. ~ '-'. ~. ,.. .-- .~. ~ .... =-- · J: .. .: r:h'" i.L!:.2:........ ........... - - ..... If':o I. - -- ~ ~ ~ .- ::::".r - * );_ ~ ~ ~ ~. .' - ~~ ~~;., w...lif~ ~.- ~~ ' A '"' II';~ W - 7="YRL~ ~. . -:J'I ~ ..-. I r.-~ ~~.. . ~_ I *. ~.~ ;:::. =~ ~ ~ ~ -:- L. ........,- :- ..;.. :.. 1 . · · ;. · · W T: : · 1:Jij;- ~. !J ~ !': ,~ N ;J~:.i-3 ;'=:'5 ~)."\o.:' ... · ? f. - ~ i-- ~ ~. ~ ~ i, 1101 .. :..:. 'Y! .. J. r - 0":. ... ~.......... ':J ... · . i'f..C.: ..1 .F:. r J :.I: ... ..... }#, .. ~ ~ 116 · - ~ Y;,- ~ · .-::.. ~ -- -~... · -= II --. ~ NI.. r. - .. · :; -. ... i!:" ....~ .r -" ~ .:.. ti ~ ~'.l" - - .. ~ ~ :'I. I"L ~..i .. I J ~ · ~.. - - . ... ~I . r ":J. -'-":-.-a: I'l: i...II!!" ~ .::: - .:; Ail ~ . ~ ..... -:Ii:;" · ~~ · ~.r_ -'11:"'" r ~ . rr:-;. - ~~ ~ I;" ~;I=:i~ :.r · · · i :~ }...:;, ":r~.. ...~. J .. ~. J::i ~ · ..:. ..~ ..~ ,._ j ~ ...11: .. : ~ ~~ ~~~I l? - ~ · .... ~~ :" :... ,:;--;;::.7 v PI:. .a.......... .. :-1"... "I ,/'.. .:, ~I"~ ....~. :~.~..~ -.=1 - · · ('Y I/i:. · . ..1;'. .~~. .11. -. .--. · -; ; - ..: ..... .0) · ". · ~ t:. .. =.. "-!'.5L ~ ~ -_~_~ ,.... ... .. · ,. : :;?:i. .:it i ., .....,,... ....... BI .. - ' ....t-.. ~.. . ..... · · ,,:I · ..Jit. -= ~ f-:~/.~).J5:~ .i.1.~~~~.~~g~~..~~- ~~~.~. :..... y~~~ ~~v ;..~&4~~~.i.:~t? ..~ · ~~~.r~~:~r.:.:~. "_L~ ~.~:..?M:"~- ... .!.... ..... i) r;-. .... .- .;..,jj r- ~ I.. -.. ....&.... _":"'\.:."......11 ~~:~... ~ · ... -z... .. .- ~......-.:- · ~ I ..... -. r:.+ . ..... · · . .:- .... ....: · · ._... · :..::":-~ i . - Ii.... :-'...1 r":-. .. ~. ..... :...... .. _. · ..... ~.. "V"I,. _ · . .: · ... . ........... "I .:. .. y . .. ~ - .. ... .. <<r.-=:....: ... . . ... ... ~I' i 1111, Ii P I II I ~ ii fill 1111 Mllllli Mli ~3JU=~~~ I ilii'I!i~litS" '1-'I~~'1 .:10 3Nf7 HJJ/ON 3HJ. NO 1JNII.,7 tJIrN7 it) S:;W::W. "O.Z ,,~ SNm'.l.OJ S730WrI 3N:/ DNMf(JH$ .LfI1d -- ~ ~~ ~' ~! ~ eJ~~;s ~ ~1<1~~ ~ ~~:: (') -...:. :ct 0.. '( ~ ~ ~~ S! o~~~ g~~~ 1~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~, ~~~ ~ "-'o:z..._ r~.. &',9. t!"'.f. rV/+ -~~~ ~ .~~~ ....~ ~~ ,;)> t:M.~ .~?' ~ ~ ~< ;y.:)- O4i;?...~.i90 -t'~ ~ i b.1tt ~ ~~h .~ . ~~~5~d i~~!i~~1 1~!lUt ~"I ~ ~ ~ (}j~ I ~ :~~J~ R~ ~t~ Q!~ ~~ I~~ I~~ ~~ l~ ,n w Ila ~ *~! i~19 ~ ! ::,~.... _ ....~It'\l~....:!..... ~ :t " "Jt.l ~" .I~ tu ~ ~M'S~~- ~M ;1~~lt~1 ;ia~ ~.~~~~ ~ ~~~ ~~!S~~~~~:r~~ I ~ ~ t~ ~ to ~ 1~1~I~n ~ ~ i il~~~i ~ ,. ~~ .' ~ Im~ ~ ~of ~ ~Il!l ~~ ~ 5 .......~ to,~ ~ ~ I "1 ~ ~ I~~ ~ ~ ~<~~ II ~ ~ ({ 'i' ~ ~ 8 ~::~ ~~~~ ~ \ ~~~~~J ~~:~~ / A/ ,~&!-c!1 ~~ ~~CS~, ;'. h' .r:.-" . v \ IIi ..~ \ ~Sflt . \ ,\~ ':)'. \ - v ~ ' ~..>> ~~ " \ N85"7jii,J4 'F.' --- 1 _ 95.24' _ . /, ~_. $Iv. v::." . ..:% . t~ ~~~ l'"~ ~ .~~~ tl'~ ._~~~~~.. bJ. ,~~~~<~ fJ~~"~ ~-%il~ .-:-~"""" (/ " <.&.<:'$>;~ '" ,,,.' / ~ ~..<~ '~4~~ -;/: 3 ~~s.t! ~ b ~.s" % ~ % ' - ~ /J - a i;)~~ ~~:~~~~~ r~'nill~ .$@. 1"/ C"'.... ...e ~<'<.9Js, Cr,.. '~oS'" <".9 ~ /...1 ~I~' ~~~I~~I~ ~ .~ ~~~'~ ~~~~~~i~~,~~t~~~~~~~i~~i~~ i~~~ ~ ~ .~.~ ~~~ ~~~~~J~~ ~~~~~~~;~~~ ~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~; ~~~Ii.~~'~~t~'~~ ~ i ;: ~ ~ ~I~ ~I~ ;; :-- :. ~ . .to' S ~ .r.o ~ ~~.~~~ ~N ~ i ~~~~L~~ ~~i~~~ I~ ~~~~~;*~ I~~~~ ~~~ ~_~~~~~~ . i~~'~ 1~~.I~~i~~I~ 'aSS '~~~~~~~~~,~I:~~~ ~I ~ ~ ~. I'J_ ~ 1, " l..' I,~.. ~iql~ ~~~~~.~~~~~~~~~~ - ~:~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~5~B5~~~~e~~~a U~l~ ~-~~'i~ ~.~ . ((f ~fSl(}~ .@~~~I~~ -!~~. ~~ ~ i ~ ~. t ~i ~ .~~ ~~h ~~~~~ ~~~~.~ )..~~..~ ~8~~~ "- ~ "S I. ;;:g ii .......... c:>. -~ ~ C) if5~ i i -~ ~8~ (l) o 01_ ~ I- i . 8. 'I I - I I I I. I I I I I I II I I ( ~ ~ ~ ~~"28AI5' m~ _~ rt~ ~ '<&-. ~~ ~ i~ ~i '"' ~ CO~~{St:~~ ~"tl. a; ~ ;e ~ ,. ?~ ~ ~ ~~.....,: ~ Ii! ~. il~~::; ~ ~. ~~'.-$~ ~- U Ii ; ~ ~ .... ;t ;"\ ~ "'1n.. 3: - Si t:$ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ -~ ~ s: ~ ~ t1 \, '- l::i ~ ~IRb ~ "';- ~. r."~.I~ ~._J. --~~':~~7s~ :l_-;~~~~>~~ /:1 ~d I.':... .~....i )l"i~il!i~".. .':" ~ '" t! ~ _ ~ e ..... ~.... L 10 \ i.'.. ~ ~. i, ~ ~ ~...." ,.~ ~~ ;:~ a tl it ~~~~I/>" . ,,<b / ~~ . ~ ~ //1 ~ f . n~. ~.~.~.. .~i~ 'lUi~'~ "~;~:~~~~~--7.~;#-, .. .. ..-. j!1 . ..- . ~~ '--""""~~'n--"--' - ~O~ '''lo~ ~~ i~ ~ r ~ -.l ~ 'W~ ~ ~~; .t:s>.k~ '\ / ~ ~" ~ ~~ / fS ,""l ~ :a / I~PS, ~) .LZ~/r 3.,t'('90.ggN (.J j I~.~~ ~"'~ '::1 <a"'-li~ rr~ ... ~~~ ~~ ~~~ ~'"S ~~h ~ i& ~ CE ~ - ~~ i ... >- ~4 0- v' 000086 ~il~~~ I ~" \ __ ~)I Ii l~~!l.",. CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Meeting Date: August 22, 2007 Item Number: 8.C.9.d. Subiect: Acceptance of a Parcel of Land Along the South Right of Way Line of Craig Rath Boulevard from Centex Homes County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: 0. Board Action ReQUeste'i' Accept the conveyance of a parcel of land containing 0.252 acres from Centex Homes, and authorize the County Administrator to execute the deed. Summary of Information: Staff requests that the Board of Supervisors accept the conveyance of a parcel of land containing 0.252 acres along the south right of way line of Craig Rath Boulevard. This dedication is for the development of LEC Apartments. Approval is recommended. District: Ma toaca Pre parer: John W. Harmon Title: Riaht of Way ManaQer Attachments: . Yes DNO I # 000087 I 1 P ~/ L · .. ~ Id~ . ~ .. ! . .. ~~ ~:-" ~ i r I .. ~ ... t ~~~ 11:1'" ~ .. ~. J ~ r r .. r II' -- ~ -:I . ~ -:1 {I -.;: ~L.I . ~ ~ r ~ ~:""I ~~~ :., ~ ~ ~ J :. . - ~ ..!] :I ~ }. ......... .......--..-.."IE: - ~ a ~ ~ ( .. "1":1' ~ f: ~ :.. . ...... I -.. .. ~":~ . I ti~ · ) i~. ~ r S .~.t~~ -I.. . ' IJ ~ . !. rIr.r~~ ol "I ':1....1 . ..:-"~~-i:.~ · : ........ ~ ~.~ it - ...."fI:~~ ~ ':'~.Y ~...-~..:.. r_ -_~.. ;:.c~~. ~-:.. ~ to :- :k tr -=r:.... ~ ":..I ......~ ~ ~ ~..... -':1Ii :- "I ~): ~ ~ -=: ~ ~ :-'~':1 ":" ~ ~ · ~ : r-:.::,.I:;' ~ ~ =-:::i ~ .. L ~? ... ~.::-I .. .: ~ =-- J:"" ~ i II: - J · .-5!:. ... ... I..A'""'"("Y: ~.: .. . -,.:;,:.. {II f.~ ~~ ~ .....:"'" :.- II.l' I .'Ii': ~~ L.. '" f1!'J ..=::r- i", '=-' ,;l:M.. ':':= ~' r _ 'WI:! . ... F~..... ~.:.. ~-! '. · ) f' (~"1.- ~ ...:.-.~ ~ .~... ... ~~~~ ~ I ri"".:l I ~::.. :v:ti "": ~ ~~ ~ .....:!... ~ ~"'i A! & ~ F. \;" S~ _~ ~ .:- - - :"-"_ ... ~ -:- ,\:J... -: ~"I.. ;. ~....~ :"-1 ~ -,..;-- ~. ~ ;.- ...P....:.. -; ~ 4F.: ",:. ....... It; b- .:. -i:. r --:- II.. · .. - ... :r. -1. .:1... .......:~ ... 'I(::!".. .. ! . :;..~ I ~.yo ~ 1 -. .... ::E I i~ ~~ L . "I:" ~I II'" I .. .-1 ... lEI ,:,>>. J ....~: ~ .~ I.'J .. -:. I:" -=.... ~ I f .. -... .~ ;...~ · · 1"1:1.:'- .. ~":~ ... ... -ir...-i .. ~I. ~ ~ Jill Ai!! iii! 11.,1111, I ~ .' II !11I tlUIlb!lll1 Mil . (,;: ......~ Itt 1'41 ... ~~ :i!!!!!I!~!!!!~i:!,~!! ~IIII liil I I! ~ ~~~ 0 ~~I~~':~:~ )~.~ · ~~! ~~~~~~~ · · - ..~~ 1~~I~~~)j~ilil :iilllill~lllillll~li~~I;illl,I~11 !III~~J~~~I ~St::::: :!~~I::I:o'~'::~I~:: w~~~~~~S~I~5~~~,S!S~!~S 9~~!~~!~5S ~I~!I~I~~ ~ei~I~~9~ ~ l Tl i<<l~:~I. ~I~ ... ... . '\~~~1~ h~%lh~li~I~I~'~~ .... . .... .\~, '"''t.~~ \~~;: ~~ 5 t; tl tl ~ M \) lHI H ~ 9.""> -~ ~~ f("'~l&> ~ .........r......II.....~:>i.r..~'.\.~m~'\O.>- ~".,~, ~~~ ~ \ >~" .~~ ~n ~4>"" ..... ';!1.'%- '!" I m I Ii!' :~~:;:~;< -~'\., ~~~;o> ~ . ~ .~I!!I i ir...... "~~... "" ~~ ~~ Ii\. ~ ~ I II I ! \>. -'- - r>. . =l.-<..:.\. V"l:; li! I \ ~ ~.~ i~ i Ill' l'>~>,- ......~ ~ 'i'~"6 ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~~~l~. ii, It/~ ...~-~~>, 't~~ ~~~:tl~ '<:i . Y'~ j.,. ~~~ ~ Q I i -~7 ...~ /"'':~ " ~i~ 2~~ d ~1l>1l> ~ ~ I, ~ ~~0 ~ '" .!. !i:,,~ ~ ~ l!!:" ~U U ~ . II \ .~.:F ~~~ . <:::--" . ,,\ i~~ ~ Q II ~ I ~ ,.... ''', '~, '\ "\ Cj ~ ~ ~ ~ ld I! p. ~ Cd ~"........ .~.. \ ~~../~ ~ : Ii :J ~ ~ ^"<'" 't'~~' 'J..I ~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ II ..~_~tLVLillfJII~.._...!~ ;""'1 '~\ . ~~ / / ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i I;. lilT.::.:-:-RWTrUMS- ~.... e... '\:\ 'f! ~ ~ ~ ~~(S~"l~"~' ~ ~ -\.\ /-,^, ~~~ I ;; : ~ I )11 ~1~ ", '"!Ict \, \..... /! ' . i~I~' : i I~., I ':"t.1 \~~~~f: ,"1;. ~ ~ it N i! ~ '0 / /, '-:.". , ~ ~ ~: <ll · II i ~ ~ : : '\ \ ~:.. ..\ ." l4> '90'~ I i I I d 'ii! ~ lli \ \ "I \ :- "\ , ~.r'r ~p. ~~/ ~~ ~ei,~~.. ~ t' II ~~ in~i k? I \ g_ '{<: ~~"'\ ~ S ~'! ~ .:' ..... ~ 1 1- ?; i I; . ~y~Y,- \ \: ~ ~ ~ ~ '" . ~ ~3tt;: "t; "~~~ lii ~ll ie' ' r, ~ l I lii~~ 0 '. fijf~~ T ~ ,,~'- ~l i- \ Iii m ~ ~.~"J' I \ ~ 0 ~ ct: t;:. G Q ",' ."', ~l I It ~ '\: f,)' \ \ or- ~ I!! ~)I II ~ ~lou ~'/~ 1\ ~i II 1lI i I \.~ r .. .: \ ~ $J I '.' Iii;! I ~ \...... 1!j ~ ~~~ 1__..JJ_t_i__.......:~:...._~~ ~ \ ~ ~ ~ ft~ r.;.- ~... ~ r-..--r"..,.--:1----t.tQ Cff!1ll \ I 1"- ~ \ I ~ j{~? I ~ ''l!-~ l' fIE . n.- ~~ .~ l~ .\ idi ~"" · " ~...- ~118.~~ ~ AVII.OL \ \ ~~ 0_.] ~~\::;;i~:=====::~q!r · l~ ~:..,.....lj.,~~ OII;~ = ~~~ ~~&;~ ~:. ~.. /' ,...... "" ''''i f ~ 1~.~ s ~ i ~ ~ ~ ~ --./ I;~l <l . ;~~~ rlMf>>JlA~ Jvw.~ I ! ; 11'00 I I' ~ g ,.-' ~ 1.0 073I.:IIJ3l$3JC so JJNI1(X) 3HJ. at (J3jy:)J(B(] ~.. &; ~ 8 i a i ~ ,. u.. ~ ~ :16 OJ. JJHSJDNJWd fBJW7 ~w:JOSSY 0NY1 - ~ . - B ~ 9 ft B ;.. i 0 . ~ fu V~~T~ III~~~~ i~n ~T"" ~80 ~1~li~li Ii !il~l~ 1~1~ !~I~ I\... ~ Ii t~!!!i ld'" . .~N. it! t ~~~~ ~ ~ d . ::I .....,.. . ;,j G woo a ~1~ I~~ 000089 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Meeting Date: August 22, 2007 Item Number: 8.C.9.e. Subiect: Acceptance of a Parcel of Land for Wilfong Court from William B. and Gene H. DuVal County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: fi!:J Board Action Reauested: Accept the conveyance of a parcel of land containing 1.902 acres from William B. and Gene H. DuVal, and authorize the County Administrator to execute the deed. Summary of Information: Staff requests that the Board of Supervisors accept the conveyance of a parcel of land containing 1.902 acres for Wilfong Court. This dedication is for the development of Wilfong Court Road Plan. Approval is recommended. District: Clover Hill Pre parer: John W. Harmon Title: Rioht of Way Manaoer Attachments: . Yes DNO # 000090 · L" ... II. ..... ft. .. · , , ;F/~ ~~~ · -:-. II ~, ~~:. n r:I "I :.-:.C '':~ !.::"~~"'..:. :~i-~~~ ;:-~~ ~:~. ; t ...... M _\. i. ~ ~l ""II: .. ~ .J~.:t-; .:..:.. IlL - ---:::., . ~~~ . - -:; ~ .'=1 M ..Iii ~! ~ ~~~ t. ~.:I ~~ ... ....~ 'I.....:. .... ;to -.IJ r ~ ~;1~~~" ~I ~ ~ ~ ! "I .J r.. 1 ~,~.). ~ ....:.. · :- ~ -:.,- · ~ ft,( ~.. - · i:::i. ~ :-. :=f II r h L;...II DI L.:J ,., Ii 1_ I!II :.. ~ -:-... :.J - :t:..... I' -::. ~.. \Ii., - ...:.:l ~ Ii\:.~ I . =-i .. ,II · ~,;;;: ~ lI;1 :.i.-. ~ ~ ... . -:."1 ..~ I-=":' ~ I _.~.r:~ II ~ II -I~ ~.I.I I ~ ._...1 .. : I . I ~~ , c .... · ~ ~ ~ .. , ... . .. -!.:~ ~!~-. -.:1 k ~ ..Y.. i ~..: --- "' -- ~ ~"":=I ,~~ ~~~~;?; ~f~-:/' vJi~ ~ "i. ~~~ :;.:-~,... .' ~~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~: ~~~. ". f: ...: -.; ~~.... -..; 3; =:.i:-r ~-:.'. ~C · ..r ~ .-: :.r - ~.~ ..~ . , ~~ .;, ~:.I ~ .~-:' I ~... I ~I I :.c-:. .. ~-.. ' ... - r-......: I -[I ~~ ...:...- ...J ~ rw:- "'= :.J ..... ... .. . r - -~~f' . -~.~' ~ .~~ .. ... ~ II I .. .'" IS:' - . -=....... -.r "" "E .. L. 1""1 ~~ ~~~ ~i ~... - ~;.i ;-- ~ ...... ~ ~ .-:. J :~ ~ I ... Tt" ... ... 1.it3!II.:I:: -I '.Ii .. ~I ... - ':.:1- , 1 f.-'.} L -:- I ~. ~ .. ~ 1.1. ,.. · ~ ~ ~ ,.. r.,.. .. = b =.;.... I~ '"'" ..---. i: I - I ~1.1'~lI' r ~ ~ r:- rI :...11" I: oc ~ "I ~ J I~.'" ~ ... ~ I :: -.:: .:. ~.....-- .... ..:::. ~ . ~ , . .1 I..~~ .... =- -~. -I~._~ L 1 r.r , P.~ Ia ::-.. "II r.. m.. r; .. ~.-:I .... ~ r~ I.. ~:.t ~ ~ ~ - ~ .~~t-;: i r~~~~~ .~/~.) i~ ~ J ~J :n J lrL~j~"':~ fL' ~. r~.5!~ .~~.., ".n ~1 ~ , 1 -- -:: -- · ----- ~ '~ -- -=--, ..... ~~ · ~...: ~ .. . ... -:. ... 1: \& ~ ~ 1:1 ...~.~., ~:.~ ..~ ~.J~ ~~ ~ ~n.:.."~ · I~r.~ ~. .. .C--'" ~~ ."i ... .~~ ;'4. ...t!...~ · · Pt..~~ - ... -... ~ - r. · · t ....; -r: · · r 'L' .llh ,,~... ~..... r~ ~. ~ ~. U.'. , · ~ ~. -" .... ..'?l.: ~ , ::. \ - 'i · L~. ~~;;..4 .-=.........., - ~~ ~ ~.... . i... ... 'a · ~ """.~: .. of'! .. .... ~" ...." ~.' ~_.", 1:..:1 1..-.:.:. ~ .. ~ ."w ~ <<. ~ --- ...i: ... ...' ~:~ - ":-..r II. :IQT"" :!I ~ . ... · ~ r. __ ... ~~..:... .. i'" · ;, ~ =-.... ~ · · ........ · : t... . ... · :. _ .ft ~~ ~ ~ .I: ~ ~ · ~ · · ."K .. ~ ..~. · · .":.:--r r::.:~ .. : .".... 1 .. 1 ~~.- .,,,,,:~. : "I .. - ~':~I (~:. :: ~ _ .. ~.I:": t~ ~ti .,..~~ ~ AI ~ ~ 11 ."": ~ .... rl..:T-," ~ ~ "I~ t....s... .~ t.. I ~;:, ...........t-,~ i ~,1: ").. ~ ..... J J"" ." .... :(.r". ... ~i"- ...... "-:.. .*. ;-.r.~ ~ TI '.::-.' .(.... ~_.. ~ i>.!JV~..:-~~. ~~...: ~ ~... -. - ..~..::;r, · ".".: · I ~. ~.....~... _ . .1." ...... ~ f ... . .. \: I Y1 .. ~ ~ ..... -:i.... -:.. "7. ~ ... .......~ "I'': ~: L~:- .::0 L ... 1--.. 'I ..,: ~ ~:\.,o ~ ...... . -'iII:".ft. ~~ ...: ~ ~ - ~ "I .::.;~ =. ~'r) ;f..~ :"~. ::. "%.~ r -:.. .::r.:J ..;.;"""i":.r ~ '.~. ~:::' ~ "1:.~ %.~~ .-.:;-)[.,:.~. ~~.i : {'..,~.; r~ .~.;.:.~~,..: -f.~.jJ (.~~:.. ~.< V . · ::i _ ."1 ~. :::.: J .::~..: ~..: I~ ~:":.:.I=..j..;-.: 1-: ~........ ~:-: ........ ~ .....":1 1 .... ~,;: .";: ~~ "'=-=- F - -"='II. 7 ~;..:. . I $~ I.... ~" 1 "I ~ r ~. ~ ~ . ~.. :". ~ .. · :-. I' ~. .. ... .. .. · ,.. 'I _." (:. "I I...." .. ..... .... ... .. 1 ....v.." · :t: ,... . · ..-' .~=ttjI ~.F.,... : "!":-. .. . . · I.'S.... . · 1 -"." ."So:.. :. ".... ~ I. . ". . ~. . ~ -: . _ . ~. . '\ Po: ~~ r~ ~ · 9 ~ 1 i. ~ ~.iHJIII 1M; j .III JIIIIJIlI ~.II !Ihlll! IUh Ilh ulll .., W'N/9b'1A 'lJNf1(X) a7;gW3JS3~ .J.:)INJSIO 77/H- lI3A07:J 073/.:ltl3J.S3HO .JO .J..J.NfIOO 3H./. OJ. (J3J.~ N OJ' ONY7..:JO SR/!)~ m6-J !.JNJMOHS.J.J/'kI tU'//JWo:J _ '1_ ,~ ~ ~ t t.i S. Ii) to; g II H !b ~ '-. ~ I. ~ ~ ~ Cs ~ ~ ~ i ~ ~ <J (l) ) I I I I C() IJ6tI '!Jd 'fJOLJ ,'60 I I .. ~#rJrl3~~ L:tl' ': / / i~l~ II VfNlOl:M.so H17V3JHNOf.f~ .:I/N / / / ~ I ~ I, II I:Q.,;.,.. .,.3-...--../; /.., 1,1 / I 'H " ,."" I I i",,~ - \ ,,"---..' _ .I I ~R~ \ I ~ ~~~ \ I ~ _-...... _ ~ , I L_____--- -------fi--' I --......-.....- ' .._------- ________ ~__.,J .:-.-~____:__ . . ~ ~~ -, -- . ':'ir~. ~',.~~ I: ~~II . ------::::---:...'...':..>....~~. ' ...- ~ >C ~iii ~t\ ~~~ ,-;,-.."' >~...~. '.J~ . . '- : R, ~:R ~ \ ==-"-"-if=~ ~ '\,\ ;;:~ ~. ....\'dlf,.. -..~. 'L-rl- - ~~I'~ ~, '~\ ~~ ~~."'" ..... . ~.~. _---~L- vdll..;ti \, I~\ ~~ ~ -t<;'~<fo . 256.82 ".l>//IJ ~<" h ..;<\ "^~ ~~, ..: .....- :t" N,r1i'01-- _"QN.. ....... '''.' "'"' fa).. \ \ \ \ ~~ '\ OJ ~ ~ -- _---ur.--- ~ -~ \ \ ~' , Iii \";- u ;.// / /........ ;~7 -7 --_~.Oc -<'d?:t:Q \\ " ~'\, )c; I') ;i ~ ~ !:: / -:'-:':':"G~ t \" Il,::::::::: ~ /;" \ \~'K ~, ~~ta ~~ ~ ~fj,,- "\ . \ \ ..... 9) I-.: ~ '\ ~'\ \ , ~ ~~~ I ~~ ~~w~ ~_~'<-) ~w ~~ r.i ~~ \> <<;') i~~ ~/ il!~ {141~ ll/ ~i:d i~~ ~l~ ~~ ~i~1 \~\]A( ~~~ ~ ~" f; 1 1;:>:111 ~ ill'" ~81:l~~ · ~~ ~:!l ~ :e",,,.. \ \'0\ \ ",::; ~ Qo\ JiJ I ~~CI ~ & /' ~ & 10 ~ \ \\~,\ ~i~~ C;~f"'l\ N~~' C; ~ \\J'\ ~~ /"" ~ lJX__ ,~ ~ ,~'O,t: 4.'i!.~t'$JN \~~\\ 1<r;:;~ ..// . ~~~ ~, ~ ~'$ ,~' ,~ // u~ 'f N.. ~ ~ ;> ~ / ~~~~ . ~~ll! 1< ~I ~ ~~'- \ ;R / ~~~~ " '" W ~~ I~iil ~f?S ~ ~ ~ ~' ~d~ "'.> <? 2:"~le ~~.~ ~; ~~ ~ ~i ~ !~l~~~; ~i~i / / :~~~ ~ ~~~~ v ~ ~: ~~ ju ~. ~ ~ ~I'~"~ ~ I. /" nh ~~ -J;"6L~ ~~ iii Fl... !ll.~ ~ f:lj ~~t ~I M :i~" ... ~ ." ~~ ~rox.IGW ): - i ~~ rc~ ~ ~a; iB~tk ~~ , ~'. ~~ ,-:~'~'- /" ~~ ~~~ ~,~ ~~~f I~ ":~ ~~ ~ ~~~ '..... 7 ! ~.. ".... ~ I iiR ~ ~ ~ "0 '!'\'''''. ~ 4""" ~ I 'IS ..: ~ toma~ '-...." ~~-----w- ~~ . J ~ ~~ . ~ ..... -.;: "........... .t2J'~' .ii:' 'i '" -~-" I .... "" ~ ~ \ ,; -" . N1 f;29.AJ~~ ~ . Pi & -"---.~.. _"_ /..... it '" (~ _ ,G &. ~~~L'G.( -'--.----., '. ff ~~; ~ ~ .~ ~ 1:: ~ ~ 9'(01-\\ '\' . i:!;6'e".{OS' -___ q?q;-J '" '" !ll ra ~'J t;: , 691....j6 \ \. ~~ .OOit9r ~LOEJ ----- f ' ~ '" i....,~~H2~ ~ ~~~ 1'!J1.... I I)~ (,) ~ _ ' .LON ~ "f. ~ ~ ~ 91 . Iii OPIf'l: .:'I t,.ltIE \ \ ' ::::I ~ I 2 =t lia <;.) ;: ~ ~ ,[ ~ ~ lu ~ p~c"" , '" ~ \ \ ~ ~ ~ '" 0: ~ I <s.... dlo!. t:j" ~ ~ Il:l Ol-E I~:e~/\ \ ml:! 7~ ~~' I ~ I tI ~~ ~ ,,\I / ~~2 >: ~\\ ~;~~ :~~~ ~~t i ~~i u l:113" I ~~lll ~~ \\ ~~~~ ~~~~ ~S I ~ I ;<~.t~~ fi:lll g!3 / ~~~ ~~ I ~\\ . ~li!~ c; ill: I~ ~~~~ I li@~~:t ~~::... .... ~ , a \ \ ~ ~ ...J <!! ~ ~, ~ ~ 1 \ ~ ~ I I ~ 0; ( '" ~le \ \ ~~;/\ !~~~ \ lX::,~~~;>::~ ~~~ \ ;S~li \ \ ~ ~~~~ \ h~~; ~~51 !~V' / i~~: \~"""<.:''''' ~~~ \ ~~f ~~i . ~~;i; ...,_......_" \ ~ ~i, ~ I . il5ti1f5 ........................... _-____ .\ ..~~ " / _--_.. ..... :.--__---- -----__ \ ~C'\~ __..... ~ ...._::---- ----______ \ ;et;;;~ ~ ~PY30Z000~fX) \ 6Mp\fM(J()()HX) ..G1b'I7S \ &mId PIX'8 1;J #WIIfM omoo,.(J:) \ nJac:J Vr ~ ~ ' I~ I:":~' :!: ~. \..,~ ~ ,\. ti It,\; I~~ ~I~."'" ~ ~ ~ ~ ,~ a ~1~lfil~ .... &.; ....I~ ~:~ 5 I ~ ~!~;i ~ ;tl:; ;';'1; ~I~ I tit '" ~ ~ ~ '" ~.~ ~ tl~ n~ ~'~~~ij~~i~ ~I~~~~s~~~~~~~ ~:::...~~~~:::~~~~ i ~ i; i ~I~ ~''<, · 'Ii ~I~ ~.. 0.':..:.... ir,~ b ~. ~ I~ ;; ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ <:lle ~ I~ ~ ~ ~.. ~ ~ "". ~u~~~n~t~t~~~ ~ ~ 0 ~ 0 -.c- II ~'-< : .... , I~~~~~~~a~~~~q~~~~~~~e~~~~;~~~~~~~ea~~ ~~I~~~~~I.~~~~~~~~~~~;~g~~~~~~~~~~~~~ i ~~~~~~~ ,~ ~ ~IS~'~~SS ... ~ ...~ ~:--~:. .. .. ~\;~ ~~ ~~ II'~~ ~~~I~.~~~~&&~~~~~ ~ ~~~~~~~~ ~!~Sg~~~~~~~5S35~~~~~~5~35~!~ ~ ~\A ...~ ~o o..lI,. j~ ~.f'y~ Q . o~~ ~ 111 JIIi .....~';i ~ '\ i~~~~ ~03 t'\._ ~~ ~~ " <=:l ~~ 8~ 000092 .-~ . ~~. ~ ~~~ CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Meeting Date: August 22,2007 Item Number: a.e.9.f. Su biect: Acceptance of a Parcel of Land for Roundabout Way from the Health Center Commission for the County of Chesterfield County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: q..1 Board Action ReauesteC( Accept the conveyance of a parcel of land containing 0.183 acres for Roundabout Way from the Health Center Commission for the County of Chesterfield, and authorize the County Administrator to execute the deed. Summary of Information: Staff requests that the Board of Supervisors accept the conveyance of a parcel of land containing 0.183 acres for Roundabout Way. This dedication is for the development of Springdale at Lucy Carr Village. District: Dale Preparer: John W. Harmon Title: Riaht of Way Manaaer Attachments: . Yes DNO # 000093 8"'IJ.~ ... -~;-~"I ~~: . :: ...~: It ~ t: .. ... ..... I ~ . ... ... .-...:::I --" ....... -. r I :..:! =-:..: r I:\! - :.: . "!I! ..: ~ :II: ... ~ .-':--' ......... . [I ... I-:L - · .. "L. r - (.... .. ". .... -. .x... 'II ~. , ~ . -r.r ~~. .. ..:.J_~ .. .s~. ~ "'."'.11. ...... --: ;1-. _t !I.I ~ I la..:r:-. j~ := r: 11 t I~ ::-=:~... ,~ ~ .. ~:=I ~. I ~.... . ~ ~~~ I ~~. I~~~ ~fm~ ~~} I" ~..11 . L ~.... .-..-...... - ..&.. - ... .. .. , ~ ~ -- ~ ~ . .. 'j... ..~ ~.Ii I . ~~ ---;;;.. 1"PI . .......~ IJ.I . IX:.r ~ . ;.. ~.~ I . ,I ~ ~~ ~ ~~~ m 10: ~.. ..~ ~~ ~~' .... ~ [ . ~ t: , t' _ ~~ ~ " ~ ~ iii, ~ ~ ~ Ei ~ iiP! · .:. I:R'I:II.- ...:. ... ~- ~ ~ .. I · c...u ... · il~ rt.-:~ ~ llt~ ~~)t ~ - .... IDII ~ , , i~~ '"! ~~~ ~. .II 'lt~ .:.-. ,/"00 "r;. ~ ~ .... .:.:... ~y "J ~~; I ;~.. ~ g ~ ~ ~ ~--r ~ ~~~ &~~ .) ~.[. ~~~1 .. ~...... ..~~ ... i ill r I. i - ~r ~ - .: II; .?1JtI -=-.. IQ ~ oJI -I.... I ..~.. =- ~ ~ ;1l~~~ ~ i~ ~ ~ ~ i"':'" · : ~~" .~ ~~ W.....:::~ ~~~ .. :~- ..~ .~ ~ ~~ :..:.. -ft4 -=" ..--' · ... ~". - ~ I'. ~-:-.. -..:.. . ~ -'t,,;'; rn"/. ~~ I!I-..: '.:J .... u~.":.Pi-=.:: ~ -: 1Iz." I" ;x-. II :.: r.J r-.... .... iT.... ...-:-:....:: ~ ~"S ~ -=:.. .JtL.~-:~ 1IJ1' ~.~I~ ~...~ ;IrI I: ... .. '. _ II: ~ or:. ~ ' .: LI ~~, :;: it -:;r 'I....~ t:J~ I~ ~ ~~ =-~"lI :.:L i... .:t~~ .. A: L"-'" :-:.. ,. ..... , I: -liIt'i """ - · 1:IiI ~.. ~ ~ _..... - ...J: ~ . ..' ~ · r. ~ ~ t :, "iI ~ '. - ~ p:;:' ..~r.;:. i:: t ~ '" 1. riIiiIi: ~ ...~ IiI.i ...: r - - .:r.:u.. , ~ W2L:":'" ~ ;:.t:!- ~~. -:" ~,.._. ~ ~ · ~ .): - - · 1P: ~, ~ ~.. · .. , '~"""I ~,- r--?~ · ....- -t:~.- -.. .r. .:~. ~J.", ... 1=1 ~.~.-........ - '.. .. ..: .i"t-.. I;.. ~ .~'! --;:;" IL'~' .' ~... t i': ~' t. · t.. V ~ ~ · ~ ~~. ~ &:Ji- ~ .:.: ~ ,t... · ~~''':'""!.~ z, tt...:..... t ~ -, : ~. I" · i:. .. ..'....-.. ~ ; :.ri="J' " r · t<<... or:: N.. ..,... -..-.::~ .. ~ ~ r.l~ · -: : ....."1 -:. .:-... ",," .. .~' - -.-~. · ~ · =1"'1 ~ · · .... · ..:. ..... ~...i.. ;. ......... ~"( fI+rI:<<:". ~ -t....... -= ......., ~ ~ · ~." -r"...:- .:"..":'.1 ~ .."...... ....~ :-.............. -: .....:-.r ..:..: ...!Jt'-.:...." ~.:~ . .":" P: .r,: ~ -":-. : ...... . . ..... ..... 'Y' . · ""f"-"o'" :- ..... .... -. i-"'-": . .. ... I..:c. . -... . ... . -.: .... I=:. . ... . · .. ~ · =--.. -:..: .... LII · .":-. .... -t.." . -.." rI"'"rI: ~ .: -=:- ~.---= -= . -. . ,:1+.. · ~ :. ......-.. ... .. - ~ IjIII' 'I ,,-.:.:. .1 ..I.. '::'..!l ~ ....I :.:""- ~l." .... :1. . ~; v. ..":. ... : I · . . .. ,l':'-:' -.: I : : ~ . .. i"l-..-: ~~~f ~~I ):Jil ?~ ;;..1; ~:~ . I. 1-":- I ... ~~~. ;.0. rt ~ '7 ~.-.,.r ~.~~~j ... ~ -r;. . ~ 'I" .L .... ~..~.;:.- ~I ~~~... s . .... I"'KEo ..1 ~~~I' ~I . -. ... ~;I" . :- "'-"J$. .. · I... .. .. .:I · . - ...... - . .. · If"~.... -..: _. \ -: :- -: I. _ ... to). ..,: " .... .. .:E COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD DEED BOOK 2839 PAGE 274 DEED BOOK 2976 PAGE 97 TAX-ID: 771665335400000 9520 GOVERNMENT CENTER PARKWAY COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD DEED BOOK 929 PAGE 104 TAX-Ie: 773665252300000 COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD 9501 GOVERNMENT CENTER PARKWAY DEED BOOK 2839 PAGE 274 DEED BOOK 2976 ~AGE 97 TAX-IO: 771665335400000 9520 GOVERNMENT CENTER PARKWAY N8S.21'30"E J"~ 19. <r, /~.. e- G') ~ m ~ ~ ..~ 3: ;e>m ~M~ ~~n (;')c:m V) ~rrtz 9 b.;:r1 ~ J1~::c N ::e t:n ""'0 ~ > )> ~ ~ ~ ~ N 3665431.24 E 11771445.48 I 1 ! L3 I I \ I I 1 Z I 9 I .r:. I co \ c5 I VI I .;.' I I I I \ I ~ I t:n \ OJ ....-------~-__J \0.. HEAL TH CENTER COMMISION FOR THE COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD DEED BOOK 2839 PAGE 274 DEED BOOK 2976 PAGE 97 TAX-ID: 771665924100000 9530 GOVERNMENT CENTER PARKWAY PROPOSED DIVISiON LINE PER PLAT BY TIMMONS GROUP ENTITLED "PLAT SHO\NING 21,515 ACRES OF lAND LYING AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE SOUTH LINE OF COURTHOUSE ROAD AND THE EAST LINE OF COURTS COMPLEX ROADtl DA TED JUNE 03, 2005, LAST REVISED MARCH 23. 2007. V) ~ 0 .,: ():I.. . 0 ...... t"..1.. 00 ,,; VJ f; N :;c a; m ~ ~ I 1 I I I , I \ \ ..... _.....-- - -- --- - --1 , ! I ! ~ \ \ ~ APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF \, 20' VIRGINIA POWER EASEMENT .......... DEED BOOK 3145 PAGE 906 N 3665214.07 E 11771488.78 ---------..---- co IV o CD U'!. L2 --------..-...-- .................... - - - - - - - - -- - - - - -- - -- 60 40 20 0 30 60 120 HEALTH CENTER COMMISSION FOR THE COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD DEED BOOK 2610 PAGE 910 DEED BOOK 2976 PAGE 93 TAX-1D: 77166S37010000Q(IN PART) 6800 LUCY CQRR BLVD, GRAPHIC SCALE 1 INCH = 60 FEET LINE TABLE LINE BEARING L' 500-02'2,"E L2 SaS.11'S7"W L3 NOO.02'21lOW L4 NBS-21 '30"[ 0lS1 ANCE 1.99' .36.50' 1.53' 36.51' LUCY CORR BOULEVARD NO STATE ROU TE NUMBER 50' &: VARIABLE 'MOTH RIGHT-OF-WAY .!~..... . t;.. ~~ Of;' t-; #- ~. \\ .' 'Jdw~EDUNEVANT >: . \ Lie. No. 2287 1 "';-1 7-11-07 ~o~ .Z.D SUR~~'" ....... NOTES: 1. CURRENT OWNER: HEALTH CENTER COMMISSION FOR THE COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD OEED BOOK 2610 PAGE 910 DEED BOOK 2976 PAGE 93 TAX-IO: 771665370100000(IN PART) 2. THIS PLAT IS 8ASED ON A CURRENT rlELO SURVEY. 3. THIS SURVEY WAS PREPARED WITHOUT THE BENEFIT OA A TITLE BINDER, THEREFOR ALL EXISTING EASEMENTS MAY NOT BE SHOWN. 4. . DENOTES veOT (RM-2) ROD & CAP TO BE SET UPON COMPLETION OF ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS. COUNTY PROJECT # 06-02.35 COUNTy srTE /I 07PR0103 PLAT SHOWING 0.183 ACRE OF LAND LYING WEST OF GOVERNMENT CENTER PARKWAY TO BE DEDICATED ACROSS THE PROPERTY OF HEALTH CENTER COMMISSION FOR THE COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD THIS DRAWING PREPARED AT THE CORPORAft omc! YOUR VISION AOiIEVEC THROUGH OURS 1001 Boulders PkwyJ SUb 300 I Richmond,. VA 23225 TEL 804.200.6500 FAX 804.560.1016 www.tlmmons.com Srte Development I Relrdentlal I Infrutructure I Technology DALE DISTRICT DATE: JULY 11, 2007 SHEETl OF 1 DRAWN BY; MRJ Chesterfield CountyJ Va SCALE: AS SHOWN J.N.: 23794 CHECK BY: MPJ TIMMONS GROUP....;... 000095 B~1!-~ '~ ~ II ~. ~~lJ CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Meeting Date: August 22, 2007 Item Number: 8.C.9.g. Subiect: Acceptance of a Parcel of Land Adjacent to Pine Grove Avenue from Riley E. Ingram, Sr. County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: C41..- Board Action ReQUesta Accept the conveyance of a parcel of land containing 0.003 acres from Riley E. Ingram, Sr., and authorize the County Administrator to execute the deed. Summary of Information: Staff requests that the Board of Supervisors accept the conveyance of a parcel of land containing 0.003 acres adjacent to pine Grove Avenue. This dedication is for the development of Brookside, Lots 1 through 4 and 9 through 16, Block c. Approval is recommended. District: Matoaca Preparer: John W. Harmon Title: RiQht of Way ManaQer Attach ments: . Yes DNO # 000096 ... II I ~ :-~ ~~~-.r- i-- .'..6"- .:~ :r:'1 · .JIIIE" ___. .. · i _.. ~ ~ -~ I ~ ~ r I~ ~ ~ [I ;;, ~ !rO ~ .~ 1-:-; · - I ~h ;:. .... t · II: ., . '.I ~,. J..... .~ I.... . III ~ ~M: ~. ~ It ;}....~ I ~~ ~ '\.a -= . ..""~. .~. ~ ~j . ..::,. ~ .. · Ii Iii... ... .. II ~~:E ,...: . I .. _. ...=... ~... . 1 :... . . ~....... ~.-I ~ i"- t .~ . III . ,. - .LA . ~ l.'--' I ~ .,} T r;...iI ..~ ~ '"- ~!I: lPI:"1: I. ,~ ~ ...r: r- ---"- .... ....... . ... I II ~ - IC'.. ~ ~ ~:.--' ..--. ..:-::-=r ,........ t...o ~~ J I ~ ~ .. ~ur I~~ :;ri p: · ~."": ~ ..::...~ ,.: ~-=" I... ~.-----. II....... , ..~ -;. .11:1. J I.." ~-y .mI _ L. 'I~;"(I .. J~ .;:;. -:v I · I ". ~. .. .u. · :\.." ~ " :- ~Ii ; -PI ~: iv- Ii J: ~ -:::. ,..,. 'I .J~ .~~pl::- i.l5. ~,i,.:..~~;tl:l~ ~:: - II ~: IIIII-'" - ~ =- ..: lI"I !ii' -:.. l...1 ~'.1 i: I ... }/ ..;.r .. p .... - ..... "'r · -- - .1, ....:~. · ....-:-; --:-.. - ~tI 1t~ ,2 ~~. 0 .~~~W.:'~ $ ...... - - · · ("(H ..~ iJ ~ ~ . :'Iii · -... ?i · .. I..]. ~ '".1 ~ I :- · . . ~ _-:=--. - 1121 .2 ., -----..-.. ....... I II' I. ~ · .....:!E~ ~ ~.;-)II ~ .,"-' ~ ....'IIL ~ - jIIiI L · ' · ,,;.. · ~ - ~ -=-.~...... 'dI. L..fl-: ,. IT. -: _ ~ I( 1It'. -.:l..... .. ~ '"~ r. iI,! '-~ y-.ii,j ~ir.:-~ .~ . .:w, .. I....~ ..;. I....... r... ~ · 1.1 '" ~~. ..r!," .-=-- _L': ~ "'. ~ _ )~ ~ ~~ ~.~:JI ~~ ~lip li.'~~ ~rL~ :':J~'~ ~ i ;~ ~ I~~ ~~ ~.,.,:'=-=' ~ ...: ~ \.i ~!.:..::-';'.~!:: ~ 1_ III~I~ ~~ .: R~ ,~"-' ~5 ~ !,}):-I: .-...~--= ~r ~ . ~:!,. :" ~ ..... ..... :. "(i ~ it .. __ ,__ ~ ~ 'ft.r~'f!..... 1: Iii ';" ~ ro&!A'l ~ - -:.idI . J~ · ~ ~ -"'r ~.. ~ 'i.:~ _ I ...... fI"~'.-.-:I .~ ; ~JI ~:.. ~...:.: ,J;~ ~~WJ.~~~ .~.~. I I ~ · ~ .:- iii .~ , · '-" - --- LV' ~ ... ' ,:.,., t~~ : ' it. ~ i ..-..- ~:i;.. ~ i ~~...~~: . ' '~~~l; I ~ _ ~::..!i ~~... :. ~ .1- r.I.._~. , . ~... --~ ... · T: ~ ,-'-'"--. .~7 · ~~.-: ~;!' ~ .~ i7f~~~ ~ · · "i)L ;. ~ ':'. ~ ~ ~ '? N. · ~~ ~ 7'~ + PI' J- ~ - -c: ",iff !j - or::::.- _....~f.1!~. ~ h ~~;;,~}'!, ... 0,) .. ...-:. ..!. It'-: ~ "I ~ ~.. -.... -.... ~\Ir I -. ~{~ ~ .~ ~.::J~';'. ~ ~~ .. "Xf];/i~.:)..~~ i~ _ .- ~~ \~ ~i1~~-I ~~ti:!.~ .. ..~~1 ~ ~..~~:~.'~~~..~ F~~~~ ~~~~ ..... .. -'=. ...J:.r...:r....j:- _. .J31..-f.:. - I .,. .. ~r#f~. ~"W~ .. ~1.-~~~~~.:,1-. :-r..~ · · .'I....... · .~ , .).~ ~I. - ~ · .... ... .. ~ .. ~... :,. ~ .: ~ ':"r ,. " 1'_ - ~.. . ~ ~ -. .~. N .. ~ R ~ i : ~ .. _ :I'~"C ~ ~:.;::. ...;::::: 1;".:-. 1/(.. ; _ .,' ~ ,~ .:r · ~~ · ~ ~ ........:, ~ '~ +-"(;. ~ ..' ..;c -:.. .I~ . . r . , . . _ ,..... ,. ~ "T · _ ~ ~ . , .... · I., ~'.' · / ~ I . .; ~ ~ '-: ' -= : ' ,.. ..: ..:" - ~ ~ :,..-_ r,!. ....... _ ' ~.., ~ ' ~ ... ~ · " ~: i" . i.: ..~.;.:.. :..7:.:: Ii ' I ~~ L-~_ LOT 9 22,50"00 S.F. R/W -134.13 S.F. LOT 9 22,366.87 S.F. REMAINING w :) Z w ~cn Lt13: Y.I :::" > W cr: o ~.o ~ ~ LO ~ W Z .... a. ~ ~ ~ Based on graphic determination this property -Is In zone l'A3&C" of the Hud defined ftood hazard area as shown on F.E,M.A. Flood Insurance Rate Map, Community Panel #510035 0158 B dated 3/16/83 This survey was prepared without the benefit of a title binder and may therefore not show all existing easements or other pertInent facts which may affect the property. CHORD BEARING S 69.49'21" W CHORD 35.36' PINE GROVE AVENUE ROUTE 1159 50' R/W 600.00' TO N 43458737.95 WELDON STREET E 141572343.82 600.00' S 65l9.:-40" E 275.00' 0.003 ACRE PARCEL N 43458725.76 . E 141572310.64 o ;j GPIN: 797621582300000 r-.... RILEY E INGRAM SR. ~ 18820 WELDON STREET 0.8. 7177, PG. 370 9 OW 0: d Nt O. 1O~ :.t N Z BROOKSIDE P.8. 8, PG. 58 o 20 40 ~ I SCALE IN rEET PLAT SHOWING 0.003 ACRE PARCEL'TO BE DEDICATED TO CHESTERFIELD COUNTY LOCATED ON LOT 9, BLOCK D BROOKSIDE MATOACA DISTRICT CHESTERFIELD COUNTY, VIRGINIA IA PlUIICI! 1!OIUiI! OPPICI! YOUR VISIcm ACHIE1IED niROUGH OURS. 4260 CrossIngs BlVd I PrInce George, VA 23875 TEL 804.541.6600 FAX 804.751.0798 www.tlmmons.cam SIte Development I Ralclentl8. I InfrMtructure I Technology COUNTY PROJECT #05-0355 DATE: NOVEMBER 7, 2006 SCALE: 1"=20' REV: MARCH 15, 2007 J.N.: 66743-RW DRAWN BY: JNL CHECK BY: WMN TIMMONS GROUP ....;... 000098 .~.~ "_ II ~~ - - - - I ~ - 0 ~ ~ CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Meeting Date: August 22, 2007 Item Number: 8.C.9.h. Subiect: Acceptance of a Parcel of Land Along the South Right of Way Line of Craig Rath Boulevard from Swift Creek Associates, Limited Partnership County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: kli/ (/ Board Action ReauesteCl: Accept the conveyance of a parcel of land containing 0.001 acres from Swift Creek Associates, Limited Partnership, and authorize the County Administrator to execute the deed. Summary of Information: Staff requests that the Board of Supervisors accept the conveyance of a parcel of land containing 0.001 acres along the south right of way line of Craig Rath Boulevard. This dedication is for the development of LEe Apartments. Approval is recommended. District: Matoaca Preparer: John W. Harmon Title: RiQht of Way Manaaer Attachments: . Yes DNO # 00009~~ HN~ 'J.lNI1OO 013/iJH3J.S3H0 I ! 8 E~:i;Fw~. ~;;I a l~li~i~ ~ ~. .~~ . ~~~c::~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ i~ ih~ i T"" :ajg !~,il!~I~ 2l1t,:\1~ I~- ~1~,~I~i~I~!~'~~'.'~~ ~ Ii t ~~~!Ii~ ~~ '\ ~~~~~ ~ ::I v'" g wo:) g ~I' ~ ~ J~IIIII I JillllllJIII. ~ . . ' II !Ib 111I!uh Ibl ..Ih " ..~ il~ ~ -IIIUUIU 1IIIi ,I ~lilll;~lfllli Ii ~ ~ ~I~ i ~ ~~ ~~,~ : ~ ~~~~~~; i~~~ .. ~k IIJllllliiiiiiliiiliii ~~!~,!I!!I!!~!!:I::I!I!~!'!!I!!!!!I"~'!I!II~s~:I;;;:;;;;'I;i~'::~I:; ..\:~~~",\~ ~ ~ ~ I~ 5i~ 15 ~ ~I. sl~ ~I~ ~ '\', l__~.. !II. ~ .::: 0::: i:::: ~ '.. \ ~ \ ,,;:o~ '... . "~, 'P: \~ ..~~ ~ ~ ~ tl tl ,Hl ~ b tltl ~ i:i ~ ......."'~ ~ %~~ "'l''''''l'~~~'lrfu~~:~:\\:''~ ~~S~ \ . I I, II \ I rl,,'''...~<~~~~?;.,~~, r>~~~ ~~~% ~ ~..,. . ~ i>. "'~"><, ~~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~Ih~ ~.. I. :!'717 ~I~ ./ . '<::-" ~ \. ~~~ t,,~ ~ 1- ~ ~ "~>" '\ ~~~ ~ ~ . ~~ I! II ~ ~I~ "<~". "f~~"'b>~ \ I I ~~~ ~! ~ a II ,~ ~. 'j....l ~~! <e ~ I ~ ~ II .--_..ti"IRU.f;f.llt,jlL~{,~ 5 a .\\ { I ~ ~ l:! ~h i~ I!i: ~-;-iS..i"1~s.L ~ h\\;'Y.. ~i~ ;1;1' i I \: ~ I ~ ' .,~ \~:ij "", '" ~. h~ I i I~ f6 ~ IF\ " , ~ , ~ .. lli · II ~ ~ ~ Ii , J '......\ ~"" e- . <> j~ U~L~W ~ i~i ~ ~ ~ ! ~ (( \~~" . \\.. lll~*:lIR I" III ! ~~ i~ ~h~ : I " ~~~~U I 11 iA~ ~I III i FJ \ \ "'::::'" A, I . 1111 II!l l!l ~ I J \ \ a ".. ....~" ~ I ~ ~ ~ I I I <0 ~ " , i'.... .......>>,,;~ iil,..!~ i ~ s 1. f ; ~ '\:'" Y;-,soJ ~ ~d",t';. I ~i ~ ~ I I ~l ~~ _.... i -'~<..' .! l' ~.9G:'o.r. \ i~ · ~.~, I LI-L--J ~~, ~~ "l,^ , ~$ I! l!! III Sl~ 8 ~ u . \ \ ~ ~ ~. ~" · &. 'd ~I\ <:, It~!~ ~~ ~I ,I I~ , I dli~ 7 /\'7/ Ii ~~~ '" '" ~~~, ~ '~~~ ~I ~I Ie ~-;'f i ~ !\ \ \ . &i~S 8 0 ~~.!L~ t!1 ",,' ~I li~ I ~ :J"=. ;'4'" I \ ~ ";: S! m I ~ I 1I11I1 ~.. · ., ~' 1 \ ~ i ~ 11 iii I \ '!. ~! ~q 1 1: ~ ~ ~ I Iii I ~ \, ~ ~ ~~ 1____iJ..tj~_....~t~:-.. 11 ~ ff ..~ t\. j;;' l~~ ---->>..,-- .--"C4O ,.J--; "'-~ ~ !;. it;' {~' oJ .~~.~~- 1,,,E> I l ~~~ J2 1(> . ~ ~ ~ ' ~ ~= (118.1 U i \ B.: ~ 0 Q". .!. ~ lilt · I ..... c;.+(1'lf;J.l M ,tU \ \ :1t ~~ 0 I 0 ~ i ~ ~ ~ .... I. \ 9>9HlIION 31YJS ~ . . (f) ~21:\,:::1>====>,,~~ · I. '......."./jI,~ 01178 HJ.~ 0/,,2/:) ~~~~ ~.I //.~/ -,,<=:) I ~ilil~~. ~I!: !S~Q;1;' I !~I! ~ ~t ... ~~~ I~~ 0001.01 UO~IE--~ ~ - ~ , ~-. 0:" i&J. ~!f!CI~ CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Meeting Date: August 22,2007 Item Number: 8.C.9.i. Subiect: Acceptance of a Parcel of Land Along the West Right of Way Line of Watkins Centre Parkway from Village Bank and Trust Financial Corporation County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: ClJ tJ Board Action Reauested: Accept the conveyance of a parcel of land containing 0.002 acres along the west right of way line of Watkins Centre Parkway from village Bank and Trust Financial Corp., and authorize the County Administrator to execute the deed. Summary of Information: It is the policy of the county to acquire right of way whenever possible through development to meet the ultimate road width as shown on the County Thoroughfare Plan. The dedication of this parcel conforms to that plan, and will decrease the right of way costs for road improvements when constructed. District: Midlothian Pre parer: John W. Harmon Title: RiQht of Way ManaQer Attachments: . Yes DNO # 0001.02 i~~. "1'. I : rIa- .~~~ . ~~ ~I' ~. ~ ~r:. - t 1 ~J ~ ~ ~ L &I ... ... I ~I .~ .;~. t 1 ~ ... -.. -- -~ ~ ~~tI.~ ----- -- ~ i-i m t ~_ .";;/P. ~~L i ~i ~ f~ ~~ ~;~ ~~I r",' i I ~ i ~ I ~ -: ~ ....: . ~I!~~ ~~ J. ~i~ ~:!!! I~ . ~ ...-..:.- Y'P~t; I. t~ I~ ...~ . ~ "W..J;II .~~I ~ .~ r [I r~ ~i ~ tI:~ ~ ~ ' ~.. . ~. 1 ~~ ,. II · ~ I~ ~ ~ l~ ~ ~~ r I ~ ~ I. ~ . .. .-J 1 ~ - ....... _~ L.I ~ .- ~ ~ 'r}&!~ ( r.. ~ I. .,. ....... i:..... .. .1 f4- ~~~ I r~ J I .~ I~"- . ...~ ~~ or ... ._,1 ..;;= .. -:::~.. .~~ .... ::..~;J.~: . ~. ". . · ::rF .: ..- .;:;~ .. ~ ~8 \ .. { · .::.:..;: ~ Hili ~ . :'Ii .... t~. ::'j..~"1 l; / : tiJ. ftI;:, :-... . P · ~ -3l:1li · .... LI LI. r:....1~ ...~ : ... fI ""T · I(_fillii:":-i ....~ .,. it.. =- ~.. "~I ~ ------- 1t~ .J" ......... .l:~ ~ J! ~~~~ -~,~ ~ ~ I r.n.... ~-... ~......... -.-.-.~-NJ'[", i:u.1i; .iIIl_...~" ... 3'i~ d...:: . I.r ..........~XJ. =:r ~ _ '. . ... I ... · .~/.f'" J. - ,},;. ~ ~ ..!: ... ~ n-..'W'. ",.. - ...- If r ~ · - . · :...-.. .:... I .. .... '-.1, ~... ~ ..... ~ '=1:". -'iJ ~ i:i:..:I =-- ............ .&- ~ ~~I""- ~ ;.'! ~ ... ......... - .. .+ ~ ~ ~."!" m '':'''' ~ : ~ !-= ~. .~.... ~.~ .~. - .~.~~tIl(~;-i1:ir ...:. ~' .... ..~t~.. ........ rp"'''' ... .... ... .... .. ."\.K:. ~ . ~ ~ ~ · -. · =- ~ :.._:W:~ ... -I;.? ~ . "i..l1: 1: . AI:.. 1 ~ r Ii.f ~~ · .. · :. I t... . ..~...,. ~:;-.: ........ . · :' "~.Ti'l'.:- ... ~ .'1l., .; J .:- ~'1:-i . .. _...= ~ -. ... I ~ =- ~ ~. ......i: · ~ ... ~I.... .;...~ 1'1 ~.. ~. ... ~--;. ;1.\ -g, ~ J :.. · .. :-~-:. ~. -...:.....:.1-. i ~.... · ~ { .... ...:....:..."1 -:- (.... 'T:<";'.. ~~.:. _ :-=- ":. · :..... :I=i..I;j i. ....l..... _ t ~ _ I .J.. ~ -..r.:Ii:;. Jj;:::.: it--. .. ~ n i:.:- · .'''- :.:..... ~. . .. . ... . .. l"" I ( .:: ... r .. -.;-. .... ..- i.iI _ .... .~-..- .. .... . - . ... . .: ~ . . -=- . ... IlL.. ... . - , ":.. "1'.: ~.llb,..'JIIIJill.n..I'i.lflllli .1;-1-1. ~. -;:~~::~38 .1.,: ti Iii ~.~ , , · ,. J 'ft'.. '. O.l <INY/-.:JO 3bt>>' 8f)()YJ -OIW NOIJ.~ ~ , ai - Cl) i . , - a' l i r . JSfIIJ,l 0Nr .JIIMI ..lW77It .:10 SOW1 3HI. fJNISSOI!O . . .. ,.. ... II .1. .fhtuh alII nlh .. qf,y~ ~ ==.~ == JI'7d III ~ I ~ ~~ r I: .&7 ~ ~ ..'t... ";...~ ..:in . s; , ~.. ~ .. ~ ,.--, ! ii ..~.. .. t: ,,~~ \' ~t'Ii tt~~_tr<!~~~~~~ t~~ . , ..= ~ N ... """ Oi( G,r'l h ~IE ~I"- . '-' .... r 1:-..._ ~l~ ~ ~,[.J ~~ t ~I l.:1~ """ .. .. .. ~~Pf.:'4' !)J -., ~It ~!& r:;:r..: · I-~ ~ tl~ ~ ~ ~ L.--~l I ,... 6'1 ~IISI _' ~ ~~~ '1 --...I !5 as S~ ~~ ~~ ~; ~~ !! !~ !! ........ "''''''' II~ 1I~ ~~ ~~ ~"kJ .Nt ~l~ ~~ ~. . !~ .' ~ ;~ ~~ .. ~ ~; h ~ ~11Ii ~i~ ~:~ ~&1 ~~ 'If '.... "'IC ....-.l 01"= ~~ ~.... ~~ ~~ ~~ ~. iLl laJ !~~ ~t;t tJt it!4 ~I~ ~~ lt~ j::~ It ~~ ~I In .~~ ~g ~i~ ~~ ~~ ..... ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ '~~ ~~ ~~ !la '" ~:... ~~ I':.~ i" ~ IIn ~ ...lr\ ~~ CI1UJ <1ltii c:;~ ~,~ ~~ :!;~ ~' '" ~~ ~:::~ ~;! ~! ~~ ~~ 5S 35 ~~ ~~ ~~ ......... ....~'-oI ....~ ....,.... ........ ~ ~ =,-' ~.., r 11 11 ,I " II II 11 ,I ~ i~~~ ~ ~:,~ II- ~~~~ ~ ~i~- ~ ~~~~ ~ ~~<t ij ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ l:i C$ IrS :>.. CQ !::J ~~ ~~-, ~~I !il ll~ ~e~ :!I 10.. ~~~ ~~~ d~ ~ t: t: s; ~ ~ ~ i() IC"J to") ~ ~ ~ ~ i! ~ Ii . ~ ~ ~ ~. \;1; ~ ~ ~ lC R. 8 ~ ,... ;1; . LL ~ i 0,- b fit 1"- . IIt./do' ~ . _?l.I.. 0..9 ~' 4~ --YC'~ ~nov ~ Nj,oh #:. sn - 8~:&b' ..,.~o 70J1' ' ~ ~~. .~~ C')f-... ~M ~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~ g~ ~ -~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~ 80 "C) n -- ~ ~ - ~ '3;C:{"7 ~~ .... m -lI,~">1 f). --:;~.. j);~ ~ > ~~~ ~ / fJ ....,),~ I~ ~ ~~ i /~ I "'t~ ~~~~~/1 ;.;t I I J.o.. 1~K1 II ~ ~E' ~ II ~ i8~ ~ / /$1 ~'~ ~ ~ ... ~ II" a:ce~~t: /! ill~~~~~~~~ ~V iU~~I~~~~m 1"( ~ .... '" c:s G ~ .:E I I~ ~ ~ ~ ~... ~ G ~f~ I ~~ lIi~~ ~ / 1$ 11iJ ~ f ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ /~ /~ CC ! ~ lI) "- ~ :.t:0::~:; ~;~~~ @~:~~ .~ ~:'U ~ f o co ~ (S ,0.011 ~ . ,01 "Nit' ~8".IJ8N ~ ~~~. ~~?,; ~ !lullUn LID :fU OLPC :00 OOOOO-t6{,~-ilOL-, IL :Nk:/9 :)77 ON'Jl1 SNIJiJ. VoM 3>1fdN<ItlJ. NWHJ.01(ltJ'( 6t!"St o ~ ~, I iE~ Q) kt'o a ~ (j U) ! s' t 'C! m i f I ~ I ! I '" :g ! 0001.04 .._-~~ I . -. - __ I --- - 1 ~!~- CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Meeting Date: August 22,2007 Item Number: 8.C.9.j. Subiect: Acceptance of Parcels of Land Along Conifer Road and Old Hopkins Road from Terraforge, Incorporated County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: (Jj Board Action Reaues~ Accept the conveyance of acres from Terraforge, execute the deed. six Inc · , parcels of land containing a total of 1.396 and authorize the County Administrator to Summary of Information: Staff requests that the Board of Supervisors accept the conveyance of six parcels of land containing a total of 1.396 acres along Conifer Road and Old Hopkins Road. This conveyance is for the development of Silverleaf Sales and Recreation Center. Approval is recommended. District: Dale Pre parer: John W. Harmon Title: RiQht of Way Manaaer Attachments: . Yes DNO 0001.05 / i~~~I. ii~r~ ~~~I . I,.:-~;o+ . ~~~.. crl~~ . Q ~ CHORD-BRN N 86i9~JO" E , , "- , " , " " , , (f) VARIABLE WID TH SEWER EASEMENT 0.8. 1587, PC. 1785 CORNELIUS J. CULLEY &- DONNA J. CULLEY 0.8. 2205. PC. 1965 GPIN: 783675809600000 VARIABLE WID TH , SEWf:R EASEMEN T " ", 0/.8. 1590, PC. 1591 , , , , " " TERRA FORGE, IN . , ~ " O.B. 6721, PC. 5 'N: 3675796.19 A PORnON OF E: 11783698.25 'PIN: 783675747900000 , , " " 15' WA TER LINE " " EASEMENT /1' ',', 0.8. 927, PG. 284 1'/ " /p.\ S' ~_ " , ,'eJ \ .s?~ ',./ \ \ ~ \ \ I ($'"".rJ /1' , \.... · ...J';.... ~ , \.. ~... <<' ;' " \ b 0 ~/ , \ r-.... Ift\ ,Cl \ It) Cl) \1&1 " 0 Q;) 0.091 /"~ \~ ACRE' b'" ~ ~ S) N:367S7S4.91 \. /cD ~ :,,~" ~Ol>fo'rl<O \'" E: 11 783786,02 \% ,,"~,,~ ~~ <<' ~ ~ ~\~ ~a ~<;J (J:'~ ~~ ~ \ c,~~ ~<Q'V (/!) TERRA FORGE, INC. \ / 't'~ 0.8. 6721, PG. S \ ~ A PORnON OF \ GPIN.' 783675747900000 \ '7900 CONIFER ROAD \ \ @ rERRAFORGE, INC. \ D.. 8. 6720, PC. 995 \ GPIN." 783675658000000 \ \ , " /'" , , , , , , , , , , ~ ", ~ ~ U'.,.A ~ " Q '"'V o.."'YA 0 ' CS' ~ ~;;o , iJ. ..()....~ ~ ~ \ ~ ~ -r-!. ~ , '~o~~a~ \ o ~:.A (1;::" U\ \ ~~c, ~~~ \ ,..A A'\.:o.o ..A. \ ~ ....:..p ~ CV"-~ " ~~L.~~~' . o~ ~ \ C' -.. 0 \ ,~ \ ~ \ :;,..to \ \ \ \ \ \ , \ \ \ \ , \ , , \ \ \ , \ \ COUNTY PROJECT NO.: 07-0008 COUN TY 51 TE: PLAN NO..' 07PR0242 THIS SURVEY WAS PERFORMED WITH THE BENEFIT OF AnTLE BINDER SUPPLIED BY TRANSNA nON nTLE INSURANCE COMPANY COMMITMENT NUMBER BTOS-0742(SC) DA TED SEPTEMBER 16, 2005. ~ . " N I C ..... i ~ ! Q Z ~ fO ~ ~I '; I) i en, 8 I o 8 I 8 co ~ >.. I ~ ~ PLAT SHOWING 0.091 ACRE OF LAND LYING ON THE NORTH UNE OF OLD HOPKINS ROAD, STATE ROUTE 637 DALE DISTRICT * CHESTERFIELD COUNTY, VIRGINIA FLOOD ZONE C - PANEL NO: 510035 0059 B THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT I MADE AN ACCURA lE FlELD TRAVERSE OF THE PROPERTV SHOWN. TO THE BEST ex: MY KNOM.EDGE AND BEUEF. THE ..IMUM FtELD AND OFFICE PROCEDuRES F'QR BOUNDARY SURVEYS ESTABLISHED BY THE COMMONWEAL 1H OF VIRGINIA HAVE BEEN COMPLIED WITH. ~ ~ KOONTZ-BRYANT, P .c. SITE DEVELOPMENT SOLUTIONS 1703 N. PARHAM ROAD, SUITE 202 RICHMOND, VIRGINIA 23229 (804) 74()..92QO (804) 740..7338 Fax kbpC@koontzbryant.com ~ KOONTZ - BRYANT. P.C. DATE: MAY 15, 2007 CHKD BY: JOB NO: 4600-216 SCALE: 1" =50' DRAWN BY: MRS 4600RWOED-2.DWG I 100 150 I o so 0001.08 CURVE: CI LINE L1 L2 LJ L4 LS DELTA CHORD BRNG 15.45' DETAIL (NO T TO SCALE) L2 (I) " MINNIE. J. CORNELIUS J. CULLEY &- DONNA J. CULLEY 0.8. 2205, PG. 1965 PIN: 783675809600000 " " ~ Q- - ~ VARIABLE WID TH SEWER EASEMEN T O.B. 1590. PC. 1597 (l) TFRRAFORGE, INC. D.B. 6720, PC. 995 GPIN,. 783675658000000 /7871 OLD HOPKINS ROAD PARCEL F " 0.0390 ACRE \ TERRAFORGE, INC. D.B. 6721, PC. 5 GPIN: 783675747900000 COUNTY PROJECT NO.: 07-0008 COUNTY SITE: PLAN NO.: 07PR0242 THIS SURVEY WAS PERFORMED W7THOUT THE 8~NEFl T OF A TI TLE BINDER. EASEMENTS MAY EXIST THAT ARE NOT SHOWN ON THIS PLA T. o . ~ i o "" i ~ ~ Q Z 8 U) -;. :a , 9 i j ,. ~ 8 t ~ I 8 ~ >. J ~ ~ PLAT SHOJYING TWO PARCELS OF LAND LYING ON THE NORTH UNE OF OLD HOPKINS ROAD, STATE ROUTE 637 DALE DISTRICT * CHESTERFIELD COUNTY, VIRGINIA FLOOD ZONE C - PANEL NO: 510035 0059 B TMS IS TO CERnFY THAT I MADE AN ACCURA IE FIELD TRAVERSE OF THE PROPERTY SHOIIN. TO THE BEST Of MY KNOWLEDGE AND BEIJEF'. THE MINIMUM FIELD AND OF'F1CE PROCEDURES FOR BOUNDARY SURVEYS ESTA8USHED BY 1HE COMMONWEAL TH ~ VIRGINIA HAVE BEEN COMPLIED NTH. ee~ KOONTZ · BRYANT, P.c. Ir'AI ~ KOONTZ-BRYANT, P.C. SITE DEVELOPMENT SOLUTIONS 1703 N. PARHAM ROAD, SUITE 202 RICHMOND, VIRG1NIA 23229 (804) 140-9200 (804) 740-7338 Fax kbpcGkoontzbryant.com DATE: MAY 15, 2007 CHKD BY: JOB NO: 4600.201 SCALE: 1" =60' DRAWN BY: MRS 460QRWDED-l.DWG I 120 180 I o 60 000109 RADIUS DEL TA LENGTH 289.30' 37-27'58" 189.17' 409.90' JO-.3S'OgH 218.82' 432.50' 1673'45" 722.51' 367.50' 1522'45" 98.64' 8.47' 1252.92' OO~.J"5" 5 APPROXIMA TE LOCA nON LT',E Q OF SEWER EASEMENT \ L2 ~ \\ L 0.8. 1593, pc. 161 \~ L3 N:J676268.93 '\ \ PARCEL A L4 E 11784340 74 \\ '2 L5 I L6 \ ~, L=221.40' I n R=419~90' L7 I :~ 6=30i2'35" : ~. :1 CHD LEN=218.84' 18.4'% · ., CHD 8RNG=S 38~4'08" W N: 3676110.67 L E: 11784275.27 ", 10' VDOT ~ , "-.. SWPE 8e DRAINAGE ~ ~ ~ ~ ... t:i EASEMENT ~ <0 Q:- t') ~ l4 L6 (2242.7 SQ. FT.) tJ; kt is ~ tJ: l\.a ,,~ ~ ~ ",. ~~~ ~~ o~ gs Q;: ~ ~ ~ <0. !t ~ CiS ;., ~ -0.. ~~;;! ~ ~ (J V) Q: ~~ ~ l()~ l ACREAGE SUMMARY PARCEL A= 0.030 ACRE PARCEL B= 0.165 ACRE TOTAL: 0.195 ACRE PARCEL A 0.030 ACRE TERRA FORGE, INC. D.8. 6720, PG~ 987 A PORnON OF PARCEL ID: 7856 76431200000 (7701 CONIFER ROAD) CHD BRNG N 36-50'48" E S .J7i 7'44'" W S 81-S4'46" E N 81.29'16N W S 21-48'32" W DISTANCE 17. 01 ~ 24.46' 15.96 ' 14. 79' 20.52' 12.01 ' 55. 95 ' CHD LEN 785.82' 276.23' 122.10' 98.35 ' 8.47' BEARING N 55:34'47" E N 18tJ6'SO" E 5 06.S4'39N E N 03-79'10" W 5 06-54'39- E N 0.3i9'10" W . N 04.49'10. W PARCEL B, 0.165 ACRE TERRAFORGE, INC. D.B. 6720, PC. 987 A POR nON OF PARCEL 10: 785676431200000 (7701 CONIFER ROAD) TERRA FORCE, INC. 0.8. 6720, pc. 987 A POR nON OF PARCEL 10: 785676431200000 (7701 CONIFER ROAD) N: 3675656.54 E: 1 1 784243. 07 1..J'~ ~,..)o ~.. TERRA FORGE, INC. D.B. 6727, PG. 1 PARCEL ID: 784675105200000 ~ . "0 wi I c ..... i ~ U) ~ c z 8 rD ~ 'i5 t 9 i } ii\ 8 1 8 o I g U) .... ~ I ~ i: <..> "" /O"".<S'\f~... ~.. ..-. "'0 /~ COUNTY PROJECT NO.: 07-0008 COUNTY SITE PLAN NO.: 07PR0242 ~ PLAT. SHOWING TWO PARCELS OF LAND AND A 10' VDOT SLOPE 1& DRAINAGE EASEMENT LYING ON THE EAST UNE OF CONIFER ROAD, STATE ROUTE 640 THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT I MADE AN ACCURATE FIELD TRAVERSE OF THE PROPERTY SHOWN. TO THE BEST Of' MY KNOWLEDGE AND HEUEF. THE MINIMUM FIELD AND Of"FICE PROCEDURES FOR BOUNDARY SURVEYS ESTABUSHED BY THE COMMONWEAL 1H OF VIRGINIA HA~N COMPuEO WITH. &;. ,~ KOONTZ · BRYANT, P.C. 100 I 200 300 I o FLOOD ZONE C- PANEL NO: 510035 0059 B ~ ~ KOONTZ-BRYANT, P.C. SITE DEVELOPMENT SOLUTIONS 1703 N. PARHAM ROAD, SUITE 202 RICHMOND, VIRGINIA 23229 (804) 740-9200 (804) 740-7338 Fax kbpC@koontzbryant.com DA TE: JUNE 5. 2007 CHKO BY: KAB JOB NO: 4600-216 SCALE: 1 It :: 1 oot DRAWN BY: tv1RS 4600RWOEO-4.DWG 000110 ~~~\I ~~'~II ~ CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Meeting Date: August 22, 2007 Item Number: 8.C.9.k. Subiect: Acceptance of a Parcel of Land for the Extension of North Bailey Bridge Road from Shamrock Associates, LLC County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: ():j Board Action ReClue~: Accept the conveyance of a parcel of land containing 0.909 acres from Shamroack Associates, LLC, and authorize the County Administrator to execute the deed. Summary of Information: Staff requests that the Board of Supervisors accept the conveyance of a parcel of land containing 0.909 acres for the extension of North Bailey Bridge Road. This conveyance is for the development of CVS/Pharmacy Store No. 1979. Approval is recommended. District: Clover Hill Preparer: John W. Harmon Title: Riaht of Way ManaQer Attachments: . Yes DNO 00011.1 CURVE C1 C2 C3 RADIUS 570.04 490.00' 440.0Q' CURVE TABLE LENGTH CHORD DIRECTION 42.19 N09-S5'5S"E 401.99' N42.17'3.3"E 371.99' S41-34'30"W N 3683880.75 E 11742021.64 G.H. SADLER O.B. 866 PG. 227 #11515 GENITO ROAD ZONED: A N 3683651.47 E 11741511.58 /,' " -J ,/ ~.r.u ,~ f2 ~";- t.. co ~ ~~ . "OJ '" 0"- J:,:Z o ~ ~ -! 80:: -J1l)8w ffi;:.J~~ (I) ....0::: ii:d~aJlt) Q..c.f"')>-() f5f'~~" 1-1{) _0 ZrD:;;:~~ w<O" 0 mt:qc;;;N ~Q~~ . < z q '-0 I.L. N oJ tit o '< 0_ Q::g~ ~~o: O:=JjE ~oc CD~~ >- ~o: I..J.J ;5 ~ -J en :> - '-' '< QJ PROPOSED V AR. WIDTH R~ rlDENING 0.909 ACRE LINE. L1 L2 L3 L4 L5 L6 LINE TABLE BEARING LENGTH N5.311'4J"W 87.47' N8211'1S"W 23.56' N82i 1" 5"W 17.92' N07-4S'41-E 194.06' S09-OO'37"W 59.76' 517-21 '1S"W 176.13' 00 0< 00 U""'OO:: ~~gt- ..,-.......~LO ~c.:)~o::o ct:a..~t;.. ~~~::I~ <(r--rt::)O ~-:u:J:N ott!g~ mO U') x,- ~~ PROPOSED PARCEL 'B' 5.654 ACRES PROPOSED l Q I ~J . ~ I PROPOSED PARCEL 'A' I I 2.345 ACRES .LiJ ~15' VA. POWER !{j J EASEMENT ~ D.B. 4672 PG. 6.32 k} o Z I ~ (, .......... ,./ /" /' ... ~ ."!>'O "'/.t' S) b,cS "'tl ~O~ '2.9J9J .~O '2.6 ~'f.,'f.,-(" ":>60 /S6~ ":J\'\' s~o~t/~l \-' 'V.Sl'\brO . NOTES: 1. COUNTY PROJ. NO. 07-0183 COUNTY SITE NO. 07PR00351 2. OWNER &: PARCEL NUMBER SHAMROCK ASSOCI A TES, LLC 0.8. 6418 pc. 812 TAX, 10: 741683683700000 IN PART #3851 NORTH BAILEY BRIDGE ROAD ZONED: C5 o 100 ~ SCALE IN FEET 200 I PLAT- SHOWING 0.909_ ACRE TO BE DEDICATED TO THE COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD CLOVER HILL DISTRICT CHESTERFIELD COUNTY, VIRGINIA J~NINGSTEPHENSON,P.C. 10180 STSUH'lES1TE 103M1LL ROAD ~ DATE: 07-10..07 ~ --- ~~ GLEN AUEN. VA 23060 LAIfD SURVEYORS PHONE - 804-545-8~ alUNNllRS FAX - 804-S4S-6259 DRAWN BY: DL SCALE: 1 n = loot l.N.: 05-578 CHECK BY: OL 000:11.3 ~~ - ~!1'1~ CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 2 Meeting Date: August 22, 2007 Item Number: 8.C.10. Subiect: Approval of Lease Assignment to Crown Communication, Incorporated County Administratorls Comments: County Administrator: 01 Board Action Reauestrr Authorize the County Administrator to execute a lease assignm,ent in a form approved by the County Attorney. Summary of Information: On April 11, 2007 the Board approved a lease with New Cingular Wireless for a communications tower at the County Fairgrounds/Salem Middle School. New Cingular Wireless requests approval to assign the lease to Crown Communication, rne. Crown Communication will assume all obligations and liabilities in the agreement. District: Dale Preparer: John W. Harmon Title: RiQht of Way ManaQer Attachments: [] Yes .NO # 0001-1.4 f&.-~~~.I ~) ~~,f9 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Meeting Date: August 22, 2007 Item Number: 8.C.11. Subiect: Approval of a Sales Contract Addendum for Harrowgate Road Fire/Emergency Medical Services Station County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: \t) Board Action ReQUest~ Approve a sales contract addendum for the purchase of 5.8 acres, more or less, from the Trustees for the Colonial Heights Assembly of God Church, for the Harrowgate Road Fire/EMS Station, and authorize the County Administrator to execute the addendum. Summary of Information: Staff requests that the Board of Supervisors approve a sales contract addendum for the purchase of 5 .8 acres, more or less, part of PIN: 798631691400000, from the Trustees for Colonial Heights Assembly of God Church to extend the closing date by thirty-one days to September 27, 2007. The contract calls for closing by August 27, 2007; however, the church is not able to meet this date. There is no cost to the county for this extension. Approval is recommended. District: Bermuda Pre parer: John W. Harmon Title: RiQht of Way Manaaer Attachments: DYes .NO # 0001.1.5 <<~~, ~'~1 Sj CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Meeting Date: August 22,2007 Item Number: 8.C.12. Subiect: Designation of Right of Way for Roads Within Lucy Carr Village County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: gi Board Action Reauested: Designate right of way for roads within Lucy Carr Village and authorize the County Administrator to execute the Declaration. Summary of Information: In order to provide state maintenance for roads within Lucy Corr Village, it is necessary that 5.200 acres of county property be designated as public right of way. Approval is recommended. District: Dale Preparer: John W. Harmon Title: Rioht of Way Manaaer Attachments: . Yes DNO # 0001.1.6 - - ....... -- - ........... -" r-- r1',.rI'/ ~.. .~. __ ".. ...... .... - ,,:.. · .. ..~ · r. r. "'~I -..... . -.....:. =---= L Ip: - ..:.. II" I"'. · :" .............!' . ..-:..-.: ~ r.-- -:- r:. ;..) ~ \(.--= - .1" r- ..~~,.......~ ~1:~~R'" ~'::un~ ~~~t lIS }..e~..:...::, ~ r;'~~ ~ ~ or Ji ..... .I' ........ __. J .... ~ :.... .. '.. .... ..... -- · :.:.I . ~ ..: ~r:;-- %. ~I. :. ~~.;Ff...;' -r-~i ::-:~=~~ .. ... .... . "iIo. ~ ~:,.... r/. i"-: ~ ~ .. ........ · ~~ .:o:,:?-' zr. IIJ ~ .~ ~ ....' ro...~ ~!:.. ~~'*'~~ ~ .;; ~.='I""'F-i ~J!:~ ... ~I)i ~ 't3JI ... ~ - ~. - .. ~. r I .. ~-.. .....:..) ~tv ~.i(f ~ -:-: 1I:f.::: 0"~~ ~...-::?=-~ : - . . ~k~ · - II .1 · .-. · · .......::. .... :=-'-...:. · · ~ 1-:. .I' ~ ~~ t~. ~.~~: ! '" #~~.~~. . . I"'~.~. ..~ .~. .........- . LIL .1....... ~ . _~_. I ~ . ..I~.:;: . .. ., .... .. . ...... .n ~...~~. · y. ...(~ · ':.~ I e. ~ L. ,,~.=-- .... "_ ~-. ~~~1;~~.~j · ~~.... ~.. .. i .1'- ~..- ...::1} I. .. .I' .' ir=- .; :.-:::t-i( ~ . ::~ ::'!-- ==-: ~ \: 1.:. ~ t ~,:,i':: I'~ ,: ~ it!. -, llll .f!.'~.~. ~l I ~ 'I .~:,.;, '~:i;':~ ~ ;.. . tf~-~ ::<-: ~ ~ ~ ~,.4I ~.:~i..'~' ~~~; . ~::. .. iii ~(4::l~ :~-==::; ~I ~ ~~ . ...... ."." ~ ~,. - . .II II - .6" =-: :\- ~~ I~~ Uv .1, ~ .. iii . 0/ ~ { " ~~; I." ~.~ I~ 4~ ,~~ t.~ ") f!~_ I~! ~)H Ii! '!?' .-- :&: r/ · J:P.~ ~~~- . .~ .q-r ~ .~rI' ~ -:; ; I""f - ~-. . 'i'~~ ~ -..:' ~. ':'".J, ~~. ~" t:.~,;. ](.' ~"L' · .,.... .. ~ -. 4 It ~:"~~ . (~~~~?~~~ · .:. 1 ~ .r r!;:-":~ ::';... ~ :Vl'-.:-~ ~ ~~f .'.. -t:-~:-=I ~ i) .}:i: . ~ ":- ~~ .:!' ~I .,'1 ;;:: i y.( r 3 ~ \-.1 · ~ I ~;:.r!~ · t l~~ ...~ ~ ~ ... .~~i~j~ ~ ~~~ t~~. ' .. J · ~. . "'-..:Ii r- : · .......... ... ::;.... 1=-':;" ..~. .!' r.... - ~ t; ,.,. ~~1'';-~~; :"~~ It .-:JL::;~ ~":: . ... · .I' ... . _........ ~r ~'~i~' ~ :i~~~ ~"S~ .. ~.~ ,,:~ (~ . -..:........I:;~ - ".N'.... ~.:- :J'j ....1 :.- .. I~ ..-. ~'~ ~ ~ :0.':- -.. ~~/&~ ~. - ~~~.~ ~~~j ~ ~ -== ~~ ~ 7:ot ~~N'. ~r:r '. ... :.. -=- - · .... .IIi-. ~ .~:." (: · - .1'.$ . -:: ..-.: -.... .ii~. -.:.. .. ~ S'~~).~ ~.~(~ --~ .. .~".~~r:'" .- :--.. :-"...: .. "';1.1. .. .. :: -:. "=~ .~ ~~A ~~~~~~~. ~ "~:.t ~~ .~~~~~\~~~~~~~ Pi ~ ~ ~:J:; ~~~ .~..d...:.~ 1-:-~ ~ ~ ~ -:-i=---;' ! ~. ~~~ ~ ~ ~~. ~:::' ~ 1 :...... - ..J.'X)J,1'- !"iIRl!II... .... iI.... - .. r:Mi :~ ~-; . ~~~:* ir;~s;',*~ ~ · :' ~:~~~ J }.o', ilr ..: ~ ...; ,.' · ..... · : ~ M~i .::- \:. , .... : ~ t- .,:. -' · ~tffi.:.' .t1 ~i ;::.. I .~:..."I:: ~ · .;.. J. .. "-:-'I'-!.:i · .Ji J"-=.-.!.. - .....- - =- ~ t .... ~....... IrI' II ~ t -....... -=.r':IIfI C! "I::. 1:1( :. ... .... . ~.: _.....~~ ...r.. -: .,: --:-rr- =- - L... I".rt.:..:. ..- r: ~ -: ~ !all ~ ~ ! ~ . .. 'I: _t ~". ~?I" '~~ I .~I~ ~~.~~_ ~.r;;.~~ ~~.~} ! ~~-~:-2' p. --. ~~ h:-.. .......-: t ~~rt-a-1\~~~ :,":-,--.:,:=::.i. V(.. \. lY~ :'f== .. I!II ~ ~... ~ .. -.: " , · '.:.;. ~_Ji~ ...~'TI....~ ~ ii.:"')-=-':, 'J '. ~ \ ~ i:- r:..~ - ...~~ I !I"" :-=. ... · ~ - ..:a.. Ii.. . · ':1. ~ ~- .. ~.,.-..T1 ) · ... :".. .A:-f. 7 .:.:." i . I';" L IIr" ... ~ ... :~................ :::. 1.. "-A-.~ _=f k r ~......:. ..1,--:1 r :..~ ..';L...W. .1''' ...y..,g~. w.- ~~-.J I:...... .i--:- · .......... ..' " i" - ~ -: i :" · .: :^ ~ f.,. ... .-. I ~ ~i. · '!". =... ~~~ ~ :..;.'~ ,'2":;. ~. :"~ :~.... I · ~'!= ~. · ~ ~.~ ":"" \ ...." ~ ~. '" ~.::i'o-. f ~ t'" ....: i;~~': ~#.:~ :~~ ~~~ - .~;~3:;~~~~~\4~ ~.r'~'I~ .... ,":'. · ~ .....f. :~:+. Jl ~ ~~ .-: :--:~ ~ ~ ..-~, ~:~W.jr;"~"R:'~~~:~' ~')'~~ I ...L i:-- ~: .. -.....-...:.. .... T I .... "PI ..: · ~ ~ ~f~:I~ )?(: ~ .. .I' .. · .L(...~ ~.f - -:.. -::- ~~ .... ...:-.. :: . . ,. ... ~~ .1'....... :. · .. =-JI= · i... .. · · 'J. ~ ~_. · ;t. - · ~ · .. .~ ~ .It!.. · - , rtI:'". -:. .. =- · .. .r....-;..~.... -: ~:~, .:- , ........ ..... --' ... ~. -. .I' L __ · - · ._ -r:. ..... ~.~, ..}j ~ --.i .... · .I' :.; · . I ~ of. ~ V.. -!tP.:.: ~ .:-:;) :.L ~...: -: . .... I . !-.-:..- --',.' .. .~~. . - r ;--;..: .. ..: ~~ ~ ~ t:. .-7r--: . ...iII .. I. .. ~ ;.~:' '~1: :~;r 11,.. .. .I' · .11:1 , t:.. .: :'; - ~ i . ...- .;,. ". i:-. · - .. .::I ~.. . "".:.-') ~. 11 ~rI' ~... ==-.1' .. · .. ~ '~~:'~ :~~ "J"':I~.~' .: ~;!i ~ :. . ~...:::\:"::,, _ ... (-= r .",. ~ .. ~ . - ~ -,._-.~" I;:.. \, .. ~ · ..1' · · .. · .I' ~ ... r: .. .. "'=..::" · ~ ...... -f.. ".I' · ..... · -. · · .. ..... ... .. I: ~-... t:..,..) I . .. ... :.r. ~.rI'.~...... ~ .. ..1' ~ -.I .. ... ~ .-:.~ . ~....--=-_~......... *~:~ ~. ....!! :_~;.~ ~I :. ~ .... ~,..... ..:.t...":j ~.::a. -'4: ~:~ : ~~. : "A "..$. ..."'1J.I- ..,.-= ) ~rI'.JII] *. · ."1... ~ · .I' .~... t ~ · .I' · --=-- ~... · :-. ... r;1 -: ~:~ JP "i"-"": i iI: ... .';' . ~ ~ .....1' · · ..--...- ... ..1;,:... ... ~. C p .. .... ~ · r.... .1'.. · ' t.L...L~ ~ .1'. ;. ...( ~ ~ · -f!.. ... .":' ~ · .. ~~. ....,. ..:.: -.).JI,,:r:- · · ~ · .u.: .. .. "i ...... :: ~i · -: :. r~ .~"'.:.I..~ ~,.rI'~..-.I:. ~.~ ~^-~., .....-&::-.. :~rI':Ji~ ..~, ~'ti,~.-=_- :: .:.: ~_r- .Z-:~-....::~. r1'.~_.. .!...:.... jI · .:.-:.. .. II . ... .. -"rr' , .I' .. :'I' - ~. · .... .. · ~ J' .. -....... · ~ · ............ .. L I - r'" ........-r-.. ....... --=:I .1'.. -....1..... ~ -.' '. ~ ._~.- ": .. - .-:'" .~.. ~. -:..~~~.... _ .. .... -:. ..... ' ". ..,). i....... .~":- 'W'. .~~ .--:';...... =""'.. ... -F;~.""" · ""7 · ..1. · =- .",.,;.,.... · · · ~ ~ -L: .. · , ... i II' - ......:..+11-. · · -:J ~ .1'': = .', I-.: ~ ~~ ',..~'..... -. -...; ..,... -. y. · · .. ...... ---:... :. ,. .. ~ .::. _ . ,} E. . .r. - - ... - ~ ... ~ _~,-":_,}! ~ ............ .. .... .: .,... ...... .,.- ..... . .1'.. .. ~ ~ -=: .I' 1!' - :""1:-:'-: F'."'{( : ~ · -.=- ';.-:'.:,,:::i:::"7=:. -=: ~ ~ -.... ,. :.}-}_~., .I' ~ ~-: ~ ..,-I':'~ - .. i ~ :-:-~...~ ~ .::... =-,Ja ":- .. .ir:... .. -:-.-=--... -:- -:.,. I - ...~--.:-,I.. .~' 1---= -. ....~ ^!~~ ~ . :"'~I ~ - -:--. ...;,L__ .l/:r:. .I' :J.. ~-.;...~. ... · : .. · :.. .I' · ... · . i- · .I' V -: :,. ... I'" '.I'. · ..... C" · ~... ;J:. ;. ::..-..!A F- · =-If ,~.-:, "ii ...,.. . .. ~.:," ~ ii =-= ;.......,;. .. .I' ~ · I :.:-:-a. · · . I:.. :.. .....: .. .: ~. .. .~.. "1- ..:: ~..:... i . -. ; '. :.. .,: .. :",.", :..:..... "rI"... · .. ~ : .:r ~.J ~ . .. ";:... .I' .... ......... ":-". .. · ~ ~. .. .. :.. I~: r \ .. · .I' .1.. ....... ~. · i :. .:.. y-. .. = . . .,," . ...". .....-i _ . ..1' -=- · ... :...~ - . . ..-' _..... . · : . P........ . ....Il" ............ . r.... .... .....,;. ~ · · ..... v... .. . ~ ... "'! ... · · · · · -.. · .1'... · . -;"L)t. .I' · -. · ~ ... .-. · --a. =- · ....,. ... .1(.1.. .1.. .. - ~.. t. ..1'.... .._.~rI'~ "'==.. .. ~."..r.=. .... .~ ". .=.r .. .-...... {".. · · -.. · ....- .. ~ · · · · .. ..... -- -.. ..' -... .... -..1' · -. .. · .. ........ ... ... :.- ... . _-..1'.....:, .I' ....... .'.1'. · -.: .,.rI' _ .,. -.:. .... . :: .. .._. :.r-- · I ... ~ =- ."....-. ;... ...:rI',..... f..:. : .... .. ... ... '" -....... _: .. . ":rI'1Ii..... .. · · ....... - ..... · .r · r · i --:- :.. :.- · .. · · - ~ · · ... .... · :.;- .. ....1'. .1'.. · ..: ".- . ... " ..; ~ -. ~:.. ..:.. .. ..: · .I' iIo · -... -. dnOll!)SNOWWI~ to w <CO:I:c Wc(J- C>OLLirl Za::O~ ~gx~BJ ~~i~la :I:::So~::J: U'lLLUo...~ ~Ol/)WO ::lc.nli:I:> a...w~1-1-- O:::OUlZ ~U~=>> oU-cE:8 oou N <C ui Vi ~ 1/0'#111& z -' " <<"1$;':"> ~~~~~~ ~~~~" \.~~ -".- '*~ "~~~~.~-t/ ~~~/":s- \ \ ' ----___ ~~ \\ I \\ II .., \ \ I I .-It} \\1/1 ~~ y\ ::f~ ~I )(\ ~!iS /... / / \\'<," ~~ /... 1/, ~~ <( Q W ... '-- ~~ ~ --.,.- .... . ..... ~~~~ ~~~~ ~i;~ ~F""~ w~S8 _/ WaQ~ / ~~e~\./ / / / /- \/ / , 12&26" / > iiSll i~ ~ ~~$::! ~i~::I s~al ~ /" / / ,/ / / ; / .. ""O~ d~0l8i m!!!~ R~~;s~ ~llf; i~g!1 ~ ~ .....>- ~I i~:;!~ ~I ~iil~ ~~~r:;S ~~~J gi 5 l:;i ~ a:I po> ~ 9~ ~I ~ i~b . ~~;..- o ~ CJI ti ~i~ I ~a I ILl ~~ 8l!lr::: 8~i ~ ~ t!i g ga, ~ ~ (..j i I;;t Q.~B~ ()' !~I~ ~SSI~ ~ S~~e \ S '3 \ \ ~ (~\ ~ ~ \ ~~ ... ~CI) ~ ~~~ ~ ~f~ i ':j~~ i~~ >>-g llCo <<I::i ~o ~ >>1 >-: VI In III ltn ~ ~~~~~~ ~ .~ t~S~~~ l~ U') "'::0'=00 wi .i :~;;;i~ ~ ~ :::~:~ s "- ~;I~ :o:ibi $:~e: irrg~ eVl'tl~::; ~ecre ~~~~ .....~lt2 a::~~~ !~ ~ ~ ':' 'r~ ~ ". ~~ :It 8~:: ~ ~~~~ !i 8~~~: ~ ~t!;~ w ~ o.~ ~ ~ ~~ Ul ~ ~ ~ ~S ~!i ct.o..~a~t!!. " a:C1j ltiD:: ~ ~~~5aB " ~~tlr;~~ .~ 25~9Sa~ ~~ ~(Siii!~t;~S''' l5UJ';:~ &5ilol; ~~:~~"~~w Q ::I 7:- ~ ~;I~~i ~~ ;Ii ~ 18 ~ ~ ~il~~~~ ,~8m LA.~D! :iii~ &~a~~~ ~~~~;g ~I ~ ..... ,.. ;~ a i ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ A. 11. a.. ~ ~)-,;; .l; ~ .5 llI! i~ al ~~:;;19...8 iil l! lI! Ii!! ~~!~ ~iiil ~ iHI CS!I ~~...s :lJi~ is F <It; :~~ ~ft:~ :CRG ~ ~ _I ~I I.. l: lie ~119 -< ~a ~>- b~ ~~~g ~~~S ; i~!1 .. ~ i~ ~~ ~ ~ i~ ~~ i : UJi I~ ~ j!: ~i!i.S N ri . -----. t! -L<3.: ~~! ~ r_ ~~~~ (~~\- . ~Jl<Q ~~i' t \~~ \~ '6'~\ ;p~\ \~ '-~ 8) 1 // ~...../~/- c" . ./':/' ~/.... ~\..,/ ~// ~ "z ~ a! i % 1!2~t ,. ~ ~ 5~~ (ft"';Q 2 ::E ..., S.., t c ~~ tiS i= r::l: ~@ ~ -< ~ u i~ rn () :E ~~ Q.. < P::i a: '" :ilg ~I~ ...... ---/"--- 00011.8 e.",. ~ __, 11 :. - - -,? # ..~~ CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Meeting Date: August 22,2007 Item Number: 8.C.13. Subiect: Approval of a Contract for the Donation of a Parcel of Land to the County Adjacent to Magnolia Grange County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Reauested: Approve a contra.ct for the donation of a parcel of land containing 0.4 acres, more or less, adjacent to Magnolia Grange from Magnolia Investment Associates and authorize the County Administrator to execute the real estate contract and deed. Summary of Information: Staff requests that the Board of Supervisors approve a contract for the donation of a parcel of land containing 0.4 acres, more or less, adjacent to Magnolia Grange (10026 Iron Bridge Road). The existing driveway to Magnolia Grange is located on this parcel. Acquisition costs, including a Phase I ESA and survey are estimated at $5,000.00. Funds are available in the General Fund. District: Dale Pre parer: John W. Harmon Title: RiQht of Way Manaaer Attachments: . Yes DNO # OOO:11.~t _L- .- _ I - ~~'~~ -......--.- ~ K . :. I l' :.. . ill rI' l .. ,.~ .~ ~ ~ .-;! ~ ~ . ~ -- . ~~~ .... L' --.or I fiI ~. - ...:-: ~~ ~I=- ~ _~ ;... ~ ~;!. 1~=" I~~ ~. ~ r.;Ij. _t :.:~ ~ ~~ ~ 0; 1"'- i;i:" ~ l. ~~ L ~~ ;a~' ~ ....;J~ ~~'~~ · .. ~ ~.I~~tf ~ · l.rI'r.N ~ I~ ., J'" ~ ~ ~!'1 ."i:-.'''' J --;:( :'i1"" ~ II · W ...- ....., * ~. · ~~ · · ~ '~ ~~ -.:;.: -;-... ~ I t'I ~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ .q.. ~jf,-::..... ,I' , ~ ']~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~.' Ii' r;' :.0. ~ ,....,.. ," ."" _ j K'" .I, ~ ~ ' .., \; 1-" ~...... · '~ ~ t ~ ~ ~ .~~ ::; """ :. · 51 - - ~:... ~. - "4'II.i...1t.;_-i2:,. ..........:.:'i."!S ~ :'1!-" ' ~~~~.i.~~~~~~ ~~:1 ~~.... ~~~~.~.(~J ~~)~~~.r~~:td~, 51 V~~~ ~ ~~~~"=:1Ltr~~j, I. ':j~ ~:I '-l~' :1... "'.;:r.. ,~'!:1~.t,ip)j:-r: ~~I rJ~I'rI'... ~~ S ..-:.-~).~ nL~ . -I?L -. ._~~ S~:t;:~ .~ _...~ ~ .".:f..h~~~iJ '" ~~~~,;i}:::Ji_-s:..~F~ ., ""'.:~ 'II.1..!i.l . . ~$~~1"':yI) ~ ':'j.~,~_rY:-._.. .~:i!.': ~ · ~.:."'{. 1 .t ~ -..: -;'l ~ :ofrl' -: .. ~ -: _~-: ~ =--_ ~ i:11. .~r"-': ~ ~ ~ .-~'I.. i( 1 ..... . .:-r- ~ J t. ::-1: ~ i .~ · : -:"1 .. · >!- ~ ~;t I~ r - :.:-:- ~ 1i',.. -;. -( ... :.. ~ ... - :-.~. · f ~ ..:. f.-. · :." "':J.~ 6J!~~ ~~tl \ ,,'-:- -. .~ -~ CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 1 of 1 AGENDA Meeting Date: August 22,2007 Item Number: 8.C.14.a. Subiect: Set Date for a Public Hearing to Consider Adoption of a Resolution Approving a Regional Water Supply Plan County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: 00 Board Action Reauestg Staff requests that the Board of Supervisors set September 26, 2007 as the date for a public hearing to consider adopting a resolution approving a Regional Water Supply Plan. Summary of Information: The Virginia General Assembly has mandated the development of water supply plans for localities throughout the Commonwealth. Chesterfield County and its fellow members of the Appomattox Regional Water Authority (ARWA) have elected to participate in developing a regional water supply plan. The firms of Black & Veath/Wiley and Wilson were selected to develop this plan. Staff comments, as well as citizen input were incorporated into the document. This plan is now complete. Local approval of the document is required prior to submittal to the Department of Environmental Quality for state regulatory approval. District: Preparer: Rov E. CovinQton Title: Director of Utilities Attachments: DYes .NO # 0001.21. .~ ~ ~~~ CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Meeting Date: August 22, 2007 Item Number: 8.C.14.b. Su biect: Set Date for a Public Hearing to Consider an "Ordinance Adopting Restrictions on Use of Public Water During Drought and/or Emergency Conditions" County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: ~ Board Action Reauested: Staff requests that the Board of Supervisors set September 26, 2007 as the date for a public hearing to consider an "Ordinance Adopting Restrictions on the Use of Public Water During Drought and/or Emergency Conditions". Summary of Information: The Virginia General Assembly has mandated the development of water supply plans for localities throughout the Commonwealth. Part of the water supply plan requires that the locality adopt appropriate ordinances to restrict the use of public water during drought and/or emergency conditions. Adoption of this ordinance will satisfy these requirements for the water supply plan. District: Preparer: Rov E. Covinoton Title: Director of Utilities Attachments: DYes .NO # 000:122 6-~ , <iJ CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 2 Meetina Date: August 22, 2007 Item Number: 8.C.14.c. Subiect: Set a Public Hearing to Consider Adoption of an Ordinance Establishing a Special Assessment for the Lower Magnolia Green Community Development Authority and Approval of a Special Assessment Agreement with the Lower Magnolia Green Community Development Authority Regarding the Financing of Certain Infrastructure County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: ()J Board Action Reauea: Set a public hearing date for September 26, 2007 to 1) consider adoption of an ordinance establishing a special assessment for the Lower Magnolia Green Community Development Authority (CDA) i and 2) approval of a Special Assessment Agreement between the Board of Supervisors, the Lower Magnolia Green CDA and Owner(s) of Property within the CDA District. Summary of Information: Today's agenda includes an item requesting the Board of Supervisors to hold a public hearing to consider the adoption of an ordinance to create the Lower Magnolia Green CDA. Additionally, a separate item is on today's agenda requesting the Board to make initial appointments to the Lower Magnolia Green CDA Board. The CDA Board is scheduled to meet on August 28, 2007 to request that the Board of Supervisors, through adoption of an ordinance, establish a special assessment on property within the CDA District for the purpose of financing certain transportation improvements benefiting property within the CDA District. Preparer: Francis M,. Pitaro Title: Actina Deputv County Administrator Attachments: DYes _NO I # 000:12* CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 2 of 2 Meeting Date: August 22, 2007 Summary of Information (continued} The special assessments will be established and apportioned in accordance with the Rate and Method of Apportionment of Special Assessments, which is scheduled to be approved by the CDA Board on August 28th. The special assessments shall be liens on the taxable real property in the CDA District. The proposed ordinance will authorize a Special Assessment Agreement between the Board of Supervisors I the Lower Magnolia Green CDA and land owner(s) within the CDA District, that approves the issuance of the Authority's bonds to finance certain infrastructure within the CDA District. The Board is requested to adopt the proposed ordinance after the public hearing is held. Upon adoption of the ordinance, the Lower Magnolia Green CDA will move forward to issue its bonds to finance the infrastructure improvements. The establishment of a special assessment on property within the CDA District and the actions contemplated by the Special Assessment Agreement will provide for needed infrastructure improvements to serve the residents and businesses in the District, as well as residents and businesses in the surrounding community as necessary to meet the increased demands placed upon the County as a result of development within the Lower Magnolia Green Property. Additionally, this action will permit these infrastructure improvements to be constructed more expeditiously than would otherwise be possible. 0001.24 .-~~ ~ I ~. _'. . _ )1 ~-- -~ - ,~f{CRI!~ CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Meeting Date: August 22, 2007 Item Number: 8.C.15.a. Subiect: Request permission to Install Private Water Services Within a Private Easement to Serve Properties at 14021 and 14031 Happy Hill Road County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Q1 Board Action ReaueU- Grant Franklin M. Sheffield and Beverly L. Sheffield permission to install private water services within a private easement and authorize the County Administrator to execute the water connection agreements. Summary of Information: Franklin M. Sheffield and Beverly L. Sheffield have requested permission to install private water services within a private easement to serve properties at 14021 and 14031 Happy Hill Road. This request has been reviewed by staff and approval is recommended. District: Bermuda Preparer: John W. Harmon Title: RiQht of Way Manaaer Attachments: . Yes DNO # 000:125 14011 Franklin M. Sheffield Jr. GPIN 7936448053000000 14011 Happy HiD Road D.B.2523, PG.762 FOREST HEIGHTS P.B.7, PG.J8B :: r:i ~ 14005 William F. Sheffield OPIN 793644603900000O 14005 Happy Hill Road , D.B.660, PG.316 / / / /~ / ~~ litf / Jiii Q qj"~ ,~ ~ ~ '" ~- d/ ~ji~C:J. ~~ ~ ~ ~ !Q" D~ ..1.1)'-/ ~ ~ ~ !\r ~/ t3~ --.; ~ ~ (( (b. I ~/ ~. 14101 · cf/~ ::e~'j;,~.); O~.,ji'$f?~ ~ /~~' ~~~. ~~() I It.t ..~ o~ ~ ~ tV'" 14009 Franklin M. & Beverly L. Sheffield GPIN 79364475300000o 14009 Happy Hill Road D.B.191S, PG.112 PROPOSED 10' x SO' PUBLIC WATER EASEMENT 3700 RESUBDlVISION OF IDr 26 FOREST HBlGHTS P.B.43. PG.38 ~ . V ~ "~~ ~"R !J: ". .. ~lI:~ " ;/ ff 3705 PLAT SHOWING A 10. X 50. PUBLIC WATER EASEMENT, ACROSS THE PROPERTY BELONGING TO FRANKLIN M. & BEVERLY L. SHEFFIELD BERMUDA DISTRICT, CHESTERFIELD COUNTY, VIRGINIA. o 25' 50' I I I SCALE 1-=50' {\t\, t'\/ 14109 100' I INFORMATION ON PLAT BASED ON SUBDIVISION PLAT FOREST HEIGHTS P.B.7, PG.166 RESUBDIVlSION PLAT OF FOREST HEIGHTS PART OF LOT 26 P.B.43, PG.38 PARCEL PLAT 0.8.1915, PG.112 PARCEL PLAT 0.8.1882, PG.1294 PARCEL PLAT D.8.2523 PG.762 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY GIS SYsTEM CHESTERFIELD COUNTY, VIRGINIA UTILITIES DEPARTMENT DATE: 8-1..2007 SCALE: 11t~50' DRAWN BY: VAG CHECKED BY: WOW TILE NUMBER: 790-642 COUNTY PROJECT NUMBER: 2007-0106 000:127 .-='~ ~ I ~ __ - 'I ~~~~~ CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Meeting Date: August 22,2007 Item Number: 8.C.15.b. Subiect: Request permission to Install Private Sewer and Water Services Within a Private Easement to Serve Property at 4236 Curtis Street County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: ~ f/ Board Action Reauested: Grant Kevin P. Houghton permission to install private sewer and water services within a private easement and authorize the County Administrator to execute the sewer and water connection agreement. Summary of Information: Kevin P. Houghton, has requested permission to install private sewer and water services within a private easement to serve property at 4236 Curtis Street. This request has been reviewed by staff and approval is recommended. District: Bermuda Preparer: John W. Harmon Title: RiQht of Way Manaaer Attachments: . Yes DNa # 0001.28 ! ~ ;~.:.)1t::r~1~.1~ ~ r/ _..L.. - - . ~ ) I I i ~ Ii'. ~~I.I II I 1 · ---==r · :r- I ~ ;:]~ "I !I . I ~,J .~ ~ ............... . 11.; . --+=- ~ ~ ~ I .. ;. .... - ~ I ~ II"I~~ I rt I ~ . ~ I P( 1 2 I , ~ II : . .t... I .l~ ,t ~J :.~ J i "2i II} E ~,~ ~ L" J QIl! ~v:c::. r:: rIJ I ~ ~~. . - ~ ~ . 11...._ ... -=:.: PI ........ Pi ... to... ...... · :..-:JI .1')51' .1IirI _.~ r !I :t ..~ .-:1' ~ ~I ~\~~ ~~ ra I -=..~ ~ I ~~l.I..~ I · ..rI'~... .. ~ ........ ... ~ t.~ ~I I r:J ~ -n. , r'oC. ..-:: ~ . ~ ~ IiII..::. -..-. "~rI':.t ~. -. - JI iI - ~~~ ~ =~..::r.:J ~iI.: I II~ ~ ~ . ~.~.. ~~~I~ _.. ~.~ ~.. ~. - ~ :}. 'fiI1~ .I.IZ.Qt ~ ~1'''' ::..--;:tr J .... : -= =-=,J~ . rI' ... ~ ~ ~ II:1II . ................. ~ ~ ~..i- rY"'".:.:;... - .. rr , .--=t. · · ~r/ ;tI ~ J ~ ~ :I · :-f._,....... ..... .-. ...... .. .... ........ - ~}... .-::::~~:t: ~ :'- i:'j.~ - ~~ 1. - ~J~ · ).'L~ .;;:o.J:.*~:t?J~irii. ~~. .J ~rr:.~f::'" .....~~.. r_ "'~~51~.tt:.~.... - ~ - '~I~ :.......:-: l.~~ .~.r:o-::-~ J".~"" ~.~~~;7ff~ ..!.~r-;::. V~~tr;::4~., -~ 1~~~.~~~~#-;A~'Jjl ~.... Ii - is. .;.... ~ 0.....~1 .+ ~ -:: j; .. =:1 It'I ~..IP! ~ II' -..-~... - ~ r" ~~~ ~ . ~ "\. ( rI'. : ~f...... ~. \ : rI' ~.... ~~, .. . .. rI' ~.I ~~: rI' I ~: t. J : '!t "....h.' III ",:d ( ~'!'... r. ..... -; Ij........ !F"' . ~... ~..;. ~ ..;.:.....1:. ~.. -::- ~ .. . · ..... :..: ~....-... .-.. ,. .. rI .I":'" .... -i" .. .. · ~~ · -..L .II ~ -:..":" I.... If' - ill. 1"'1 . ... -". :.. ....:... .-... rI'............:...... .. I .... ....... ",'JOI rI' J .- -:: ~ ...~ .. ....... ":.. .-....... _ -... · "L .. . · r' · . .....:.. · -::-i-'t ...::........ rI' ~ · ~ . .. I 'H =:~ I "rI' :.- . -)~~~ . -( ..-: - ........-.. - . ~.... ' -...~ "1.1 .... .r:: -. ~ ~'. : .. ..:-:V-. . rw;~ 379 7IK '. 318 · 378 1K tI} 381 CURTIS · smBT JO'zlS' PlJBUC vT.anr~~1ruvA2!l U1.1LlTY IiA.sBMBNr ' . ACROSS LOT 371- _1JLOCK "M" ''PLAN 0pi:Bi$fBR" '. .IIBRMt1DA DIS71l1CT' CIIIlS'l'BR1'lB COVNTY, VJRQINlA 1NS ...,. II su&Jrar 7D AHV EASDII'H7I " IffcaID AND C1IHIlt PEIf7INrNT 'AOTS ' IfICH A n.r EMCH lIGHT &VSCLOIE. HARVIY L. PARKS, INC.. 45D11t: HUNDRED ROAD ClG7E'If. VA. 141-8141 741....fml! y, ,"w n l- '''' ~J..Cl PfA 0001.30 . CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Meeting Date: August 22,2007 Item Number: 8.C.15.c. Subiect: Request permission to Install a Private Water Service Within a Private Easement to Serve Property at 13300 Hensley Road County Administrator's Comments: County Admin!_~trator: qj/ Board Action Reauested: Grant patricia A. Hamilton, permission to install a private water service within a private easement and authorize the County Administrator to execute the water connection agreement. Summary of Information: patricia A. Hamilton has requested permission to install a private water service within a private easement to serve property at 13220 Hensley Road. This request has been reviewed by staff and approval is recommended. District: Bermuda Pre parer: John W. Harmon Title: RiQht of Way Manaoer Attachments: . Yes DNO # 0001.31. I Q ~ 134~O 1:5420 SPRING RUN ROAD R T. 654 30' RIW -N840I2'W 356.711 PROPOSED 10' x 10' PUBLIC WATER EASEMENT (SEE DRAWING "A") t 3421 Raymond C. & Jane H. Hughes GPIN 732662329600000 13421 Spring Run Road DB.2170, 10.1414 ~ i'J 0(;;; -,ILllJ ~ ,,..,.,,, ~ f~ I /~ /~ /;-} -1V1/o<6 'w 52) 2. Raymond C. & Jane H. .~, Hughes OPIN 732662037800000 13302 Hensley Road D.B.2200, PG.124 13300 Patricia A. Hamilion GPIN 732662123900000 13300 HensleY Road D.B.221S. 00.480 1~220 Gloria B. Easterling I GPIN 732662443400000 13220 HeDs1ey Road D.B.2200, PG.498 PLAT SHOWING A 10. X 10. PUBLIC WATER EASEMENT, ACROSS THE PROPERTY BELONGING BENJAMIN SCOTT AND MARY A. FORD MATOACA DISTRICT, CHESTERFIELD COUNTY, VIRGINIA. 13400 ROD 13401 o I 50' 100' 200' I I I SCALE 1-=100' CHESTERFIELD COUNTY, VIRGINIA UTILITIES DEPARTMENT DATE: 7-31-2007 SCALE: 1"=100' DRAWN BY: VAG CHECKED BY: WOW TILE NUMBER: 730-662 COUNTY PROJECT NUMBER: 200' t - 03~ 7 INfORMA TlON ON PLAT BASED ON PARCEL PLAT 0.8.2202. PG.1193 PARCEL PLAT 0.8.2170, PG.1414 PARCEL PLAT 0.8.2200. PG.124 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY GIS SYSTEM 0001.33 . CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Meeting Date: August 22,2007 Item Number: 8.C.15.d. Subiect: Request permission to Install a Private Water Service Within a Private Easement to Serve Property at 13220 Hensley Road County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: 01...- Board Action ReauestV Grant Gloria B. Easterling! permission to install a private water service within a private easement and authorize the County Administrator to execute the water connection agreement. Summary of Information: Gloria B. Easterling has requested permission to install a private water service within ~ private easement to serve property at 13220 Hensley Road. This request has been reviewed by staff and approval is recommended. District: Bermuda Preparer: John W. Harmon Title: RiQht of Way Manaaer Attachments: . Yes DNO # 000:134 ... - :.. "-t -.1-- ..I ..........L. L - I t 1 I ~ -.. 1 I 1 1 I I ~ ~ IJ ~ ! ~ ~ ~ -~ ... . I J' ~ II ~)~ I -.. I .J ~ a. .. ~ ~" ...... CI:~~"; P-'SII. "I".....I_~. - r. _ ... =- I .. .. 1 ~.. _. ..1 ~ -.J.I' :tII .... ra-: !II · ~,. ~I I ~. ~':' 1.~!f ~ ;'... - .I.I!J~~ :.:- ~ ~ :J.... '::.:.. ---.~ ~ ~.W':'~,rJ=~ !J= · U2i ... :.;~ : -- ........ ~ '."'. "I~I tilt-:.. "1"1 ' ..... L .J. ~.;L :-=-- .... .....1 ~..: ~ ;J~ ~~n1'" _...: l:1li. -I\i. "~.. ~ (I ~... --:.~~~ 'I~........--:"'~~'::' -..!~ ~...,\~~.~ .. ..~:{ rJ ~ ~"i~.....~-:g~I~ B '," ~.~~ ";r.I~:-::". .. .... ...... .:..-:. II'" .., ..,.. .. II.: ~ ~ .. :.. ~ I ~... ~ · ~:W ~~ ..~~ "I "1 f= ~ - ~ ~. ..... ..."1".... 1..1.{".!.i-::i ".,1. ,...'~T'I J 5..... . .-r:--- II: ~ r.1I:r.... r:.., ~..~... ........ r_ ~ -:... " ~ JI..!" _ I.~..)-., I r/ i. . ~~ .. '''~~I' ~~ .~~~~ 3.-11 i"- ":.~ .. ~) ?:-. '!.i ~ ...~g. .;. ..r:. .. :I ci ~ 13430 13400 SPRING RUN ROAD RT. 654 30' RIW - N840JZ'W 356.71' PROPOSED 10' x 10' PUBLIC WATER EASEMENT (SEE DRAWING itA") ROO 1:5421 Raymond C. &: Jane H. Hughes GPIN 732662329600000 13421 Spring Run Road D.B.2170, 00.1414 f;J o~ ! LIJ.J ~ ,'" 13401 /:'/ ,i / I // o I 50~ 100' 200' I I I SCALE 1-=100' -Nl/o<6'W 5272 Raymond C. & Jane H. .~, Hughes GPIN 732662037800000 13302 HCDIlcy Road D.B.2200, PG.l24 13300 Patricia A. ~on OPIN 732662123900000 13300 HensleY Road D.B.2215, PG.480 13220 Gloria B. Easterling t GPIN 732662443400000 13220 Hensley Road D.B.2200, PG.498 PLAT SHOWING A 10. X 10. PUBLIC WATER EASEMENT, ACROSS THE PROPERTY BELONGING BENJAMIN scan- AND MARY A. FORD MATOACA DISTRICT, CHESTERFIELD COUNTY, VIRGINIA. CHESTERFIELD COUNTY, VIRGINIA UTILITIES DEPARTMENT DATE: 7-31-2007 SCALE: 1"=100r DRAWN BY: VAG CHECKED BY: WOW TILE NUMBER: 730-662 COUNTY PROJECT NUMBER: 200 t - 03~ 7 INFORMATION ON PLAT BASED ON PARCEL PLAT 0.8.2202. PG.1193 PARCEL PLAT 0.8.2170, PG.1414 PARCEL PLAT 0.B.22oo. PG.124 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY GIS SYSTEM 0001.36 6) CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Meeting Date: August 22, 2007 Item Number: 8.C.15.e. Subiect: Approval of a Request from R. L. Dunn for an Exception to the Use of Public Water for a Proposed Residential Structure Located at 8521 River Road County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: ~ Board Action Reauested: Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors approve R. L. Dunn/s request for an exception to the use of public water. Summary of Information: On August 81 20071 staff received a letter from R. L. Dunn requesting an exception to the use of public water for a proposed home to be located at 8521 River Road. Under Section 18-61 of the Chesterfield County Code I the Board of Supervisors may grant an exception to the requirement to use public water when a new residential structure requires an onsite water service line of more than 1/000 feet. The line will be greater than 1/000 feetl therebYI qualifying this situation as an exception to the use of public water. District: Matoaca Preparer: Attachments: William O. Wright . Yes Title: Assistant Director of Utilities DNO # 000:137 rI' .~fIj ~ ...-~ :~ .. -: I ..... .....-.- .. __ 1 .. I .~ t ~~ ~ ~~ -~ iJ: 1'...":1 -=-- L' . " r.ij.;--'-& :~~~ ~ :::..~.~:. '-:-j I :~ ~ .. - ,..~~ - L ':!a'~ L "I :"II .... iiL :i ~ ~ ~I ,-=":L T'1~:'r )) 101 · ~ !!: .. ..... I:;. :::; P". ~ " ~ ~ .!. I.... ~~; ~~E ~ ~. .t .. . 1."""1 II%"'- ... 4 "'~I!-1 Lr m-t.;w;o HI ... i'. ~ I -... . .. - 011' .:.J"II" ~ I. ... .::-:- . ... -- ~~ ~ f" :E .... -- .... .. . .~ - -~ :E .. I" . .j ~ -7 . . :-1............ .. .. .. .. ......- . .~ ....-. ~_ II- :;. I rr. ria ......... i.J.... ........... .... · 1...,-. "":I: .!.. _ ..... ' .. ... ~ ~- ~ I · .... LI..-. .... .. :" r. . I~ T ,. II ~~ .. t Ii T.:"" =-..., ~:". J ~ . . I. ':-II.. ~ -~ :1. .~ . . .1 .. rI' ... August 8,2007 R.L. Dunn III 8521 River Road Petersburg, VA 23803-1025 Bill Wright Dept of Utilities Chesterfield, 'V A 23832 Reference permit #2007-08-07-039 Dear Mr. Wright Steve Blackburn advised me to request a variance on not hooking up to county water. My new home will be an estimated 2~833 feet from River Road.. Two years ago department of utilities told me that I did not need to hook up to COWlty water. I then applied for a well permit and had my well installed. Please fell free to contact me at 804-586....9321. Sincerely; R.L. Dunn 0001.39 .~ , ~~~!~~ CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Meeting Date: August 22,2007 Item Number: 8.C.15.f. Subiect: Request permission for a Proposed Fence to Encroach Within a Variable Width Storm Water Management System/Best Management Practice Easement and a Sixteen-Foot Sewer Easement and a Fifty-Foot buffer Across Lot 2, Mineola, A Resub of Lots 6 and 71 Section E County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: OJ Board Action Reauest~ Grant Joseph Stover and Terrica Stover, permission for a proposed fence to encroach within a variable width SWM/BMP easement and a 16' Sewer Easement and a 50' buffer across Lot 21 Mineola, A Resub of Lots 6 and 7, Section E, subject to the execution of a license agreement. Summary of Information: Joseph Stover and Terrica Stover, have requested permission for a proposed fence to encroach within a variable width SWM/BMP Easement and a 16' Sewer Easement and a 50' buffer across Lot 2, Mineola, A Resub of Lots 6 and 7, Section E. This request has been reviewed by staff and approval is recommended. District: Bermuda Preparer: John W. Harmon Title: Richt of Way ManaQer Attachments: . Yes DNO 000140 Lo~1 / mJ!'n:'V~e""As en 4P1;2 .:. ..~tVJ.dI!JGfJ '7" ~~ r!I~ D_/Dft.:r/~ MfNI!::OLt!j Scale:~' C/1t!;SJerfleld Courr/1h VJfghia .(ci1i ~Jf6!~-s'~19". ,~ c.t~;..eJr FiAAJ,r .. · PL.AtMi!As · ARCHITECTS. ~EERs · SURVEYORS . 60181lfidh4lJ' Ac.I- Bulla 100 · RId...... VIrgIftIa 21231S. 7II4-OS71 ..FM 784-2835 11038~ PMavaV. -"1 · A8hIIncI, ~ 23Da5. (804) 6iN1188. F8lC (804) S5O-2057 0001.42 I-~~ ~ I ~ _ _ ~ . CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Meeting Date: August 22, 2007 Item Number: 8.C.16.",. Subiect: Request to Quitclaim a Portion of a Twenty-Foot Sewer Easement and a Ten-Foot Temporary Construction Easement Across the Property of Leroy B. Vaughan County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Q1. Board Action Reaueste~~ Authorize the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors and the County Administrator to execute a quitclaim deed to vacate a portion of a 20' sewer easement and a 10' temporary construction easement across the property of Leroy B. Vaughan. Summary of Information: Leroy B. Vaughan has requested the quitclaim of a portion of a 20' sewer easement and a 10' temporary construction easement across his property as shown on the attached plat. Staff has reviewed the request and approval is recommended. District: Midlothian Preparer: John W. Harmon Title: RiQht of Way Manager Attachments: . Yes DNO # 0001.43 -~ -- --:..~ - m1 'CS:iIiI ...:...j I I J~ .. .......... ...-:-. I~ ...:.. ~~~ :... ~ ::I . ,. .~ ~ ; I': :. 1 I" . I ~"iLi!t ~ .... : * ...~ ... :.: ~ -:- ;, ~ ~r. · ~ ~ ~~~ -. i.I .~ 1 .... .. r.I'~ ~ ~ I a.: ~ .. . .. I II.: U ..;ci, ~ rI' .... :.- .:-:: L ~ ~ i - · ., · "I - ~.., ~..... ..... ... I.....,.. .- - .....,; . I ill ~ ," ... .. ~.... ... . r II:J 1:1.. ~iI...-:III f. .:::Eirl. L:...... .YlII" IWiQIoI .. ".J L1 ~1I1iI ~ .:.:, ."-' ... = I: .,.. · ,. ~ :.,.. .... J ~~irjj'-", I ~ ;-;; . ..... Do ~." u :-: '1"1 ~~ '.I L ~~ aI III ~ 71"-. - -N....-.....;I' .~. T. !::-:- _.::-~ "~'^:. ""::-li ,.,........... :t..~ . .. iii: J. !iLti.. ~ dI 'K. ~ I ~ rI' · "~W ~ ............ .. .. ...~. '''' I~ ...... · :"l1lI =I ~ ~ :.. 'b i -.:~... IIIIIIC": -,;;:- ... ~ it! ~.; !A - ~ ~ ...,..... ~ :.- ~ ;,......11 .. ~ ~.... ..1:." ... .... ...... ~ Ii-..... ....... ,. ~....... "" . ..., IIIfi ~. ~ ~. ~- ;.t:.. . ~... -,-;r'~ _ 9 ~ ~ t;-:.;. ~,} .. r:..:. ~.. ;.: = IIJI::!~ ... _ ~ ...r. . I . . ...-.....J . ill r t=.'" CII p:r ~~ 1 ~ - to. I::i:-l I i~~ ~.u .~ ~ ~ .::. iI .... ~J ~ ":II ! ~ ~PilM ~;~~ "~1:~~ ;.- - I ...1. .: ~ '.. : ~~JIII' !III! I Iii a 111;11111"1. . . 073~;:=; S~ 3H1 ..1 ~ ~ ; I ~ - II III JJi lal I If I ill . fJNISSOlKJCl3l\l'::lllX 38 Q1 lN31GSY3 H3IIt3S J ~ ~ ~ ~ . . . . .. ill filii d I II IS ! .. AJMIIN$,(it 1f.:lO NOIJ.LlIOd If !JNIMOHS llf7d ! ~ S: '" 8 ~ r- ~i8' ! d lL.. o~ :z 0 ooD.. ~ ~,- q8~ ~ii h~. 0') 0 f ~ I~~ Ie a I . ~.~~ it ~ ~ (0 ~ Ilill ~I~ ~ i~ J- (J l.LJ 6" "0 !~~ I ~ ~~ ~ Q: 0 .i !s... ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a.. ~~il;1 il ~~ ~i ~ " Ii z :::> ~ :: ~~ e ~ ~ . ~ t ~ 0 u ~ Q) 0 u (f) ilr ~~ml Kf'i:(;) ~c4lt):t 5~~~ I\!- ~' \" ~~ OJ'~'/ (f a . lZi~~~ ~h~ !~~~ ~~~ " ,.~~~ .~I ~ii ili t ~ tt !I') .~ ~ ~ t ( ~ ~ 8 s OCr ! ~ I i ~ i ~ I ; ! OO()1.~5 ~!~~ ~~~I ~~~~ ~O'I ~ .... ~~~ R 1 r _ -) ~~,~ CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Meeting Date: August 22,2007 Item Number: 8.C.16.b. Subiect: Request to Quitclaim Two Sixteen-Foot Water Easements Across the Property of Commonwealth Golf Properties L.L.C. County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Qj U~ Board Action Reauested: Authorize the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors Administrator to execute a quitclaim deed to vacate 2 16' across the property of Commonwealth Golf Properties L.L.C. and the County water easements Summary of Information: Commonwealth Golf Properties L.L.C. has requested the quitclaim of 2 16' water easements across its property as shown on the attached plat. Staff has reviewed the request and approval is recommended. District: Clover Hill Preparer: John W. Harmon Title: Riaht of Way Manaaer Attachments: . Yes DNO # 000:146 ill11hJ '~I j II' 11'1 J III1 ~ i i !lil I'I! lu,r !ll. Mil it I~ ~~i. lu~;;it ~8U~;;. !~!!&t~l!11!!;1!~4:S II ~... t ! '.: ~:;~:I:!i~~~~~S!::::!~ ~ ........- .UIIIItXJ ~ tK ..... . fK ...... ...... .., AU ~ ~"" I : i : ',' ~I~I ! i ~ ~ ~ I II U ~ @ ; i T"" ~~~ ~ . ~ i .- ! ~~I ~ la~ m i~'~1 ~~I~~I 'I il:; ~ lu !U: IIG .~ ~I~ ~il; ~~ !JfJ II li~:! i~ I;!II i 1;1 ~di iii 0 '-=t s ~ ~ t uj I I 'I j . 000148 IC\~ '~). ~!1ItJrI CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 2 Meeting Date: August 22, 2007 Item Number: 8.C.17. Subiect: Award of Construction Contract for County Project #06-0377, Phase II Modifications Proctors Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Q() / )- Board Action Reauesbfd: The Board of Supervisors is requested to award the construction contract to Mid Eastern Builders, Inc. in the amount of $28,330,000 and authorize the County Administrator to execute the necessary documents. Summary of Information: This proj ect consists of construction of a new thickener building, a new digester building, two new digesters, a holding tank and various modifications and demolition of other buildings at the Proctors Creek Wastewater Treatment plant, with various civil, mechanical and electrical work. These processes are utilized to properly treat wastewater sludge within the treatment plant prior to ultimate disposal. Staff received three (3) bids ranging from $28,330,000 to $34,439,075. The lowest bid, in the amount of $28,330,000, was submitted by Mid Eastern Builders, Inc. The County's engineering consultant, R. Stuart Royer & Assoc., has evaluated the bids and recommends award of the contract to the low bidder. Funds are available in the current CIP. District: Bermuda Attachments: Georae B. Haves . Yes Title: Assistant Director Preparer: DNO # 000:149 ~ WI CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 2 of 2 Meeting Date: August 22,2007 Budaet and Manaaement Comments: This item requests that the Board award a construction contract to Mid Eastern Builders, Inc. in the amount of $28,330,000 and authorize the County Administrator to execute the necessary documents for the Proctors Creek upgrades project. The recommended bid amount is approximately $4.8 million (20.5%) higher than what was originally budgeted for this phase of the project. While the recommended contract amount exceeds estimates, staff recommends proceeding using funds that are currently appropriated and planned for subsequent phases of this project. The increase in costs can be attributed to additional work identified during engineering, various economic factors such as the cost of construction materials, and the effects on the construction market of a statewide requirement to meet more stringent Chesapeake Bay Act water quality standards by January 2011. It is estimated by the state Department of Environmental Quality that economic factors could increase the cost of wastewater treatment plant projects by as much as 20 percent statewide. Staff is developing measures, including expanded marketing initiatives, to help minimize pricing variances on future phases of the Proctors Creek upgrade project. Staff will make any necessary recommendations to meet subsequent funding requirements as additional pricing information becomes available. Preparer: Allan M. Carmody Title: Director, Budaet and Manaaement 0001.50 . CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 3 Meeting Date: August 22, 2007 Item Number: 8.C.18. Subiect: Authorization of Change Order for Construction of the Route 360 (Swift Creek to Winterpock Road) Combined Widening Project Noise Wall County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: qJ {l Board Action Reauested: The Board is requested to authorize the County Administrator to execute a change order, up to $1 .5 million, for the construction of a noise wall on the Route 360 (Swift Creek to Winterpock Road) Combined project. Summary of Information: In May 2006, the Board approved the contract award for the Route 360 (Swift Creek to Winterpock Road) Combined Widening project. The road construction phase of the project has gone extremely well and is nearing completion. The Federal Highway Administration, as part of their approval of the project, required a noise wall to be constructed at the Thornridge subdivision. The noise wall was not included in the project contract. The estimated cost of the wall at the time of the contract award was $486,000. Construction plans for the wall and other specific details were not available at the time. Detailed plans have now been completed. Our contractor's price to construct the wall is $1,478,776. (Continued on Page 2) Preparer: R.J. McCracken Title: Director of Transportation Agen666 Attachments: . Yes DNa # 00015.1 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 2 of 3 Summary of Information: (continued) Staff believes the initial estimated cost for the wall did not accurately reflect the true price of wall construction and did not cover all the required work. In additionl specific site conditions (rock, restricted work areal proximity to power lines, grading I etc.) add to the complexity of the wall construction. Staff believes bidding the wall as a stand-alone project will not result in a significant reduction in the price and would delay construction of the wall. Therefore I staff therefore recommends the contractor's price be accepted, and the wall be constructed as a change order to the existing Route 360 contract. FHWA and VDOT will also have to approve the noise wall price. VDOT's obligation to reimburse the county under the project agreement, as previously discussed with the Board, is subject to state appropriation of the funds and approval by the Commonwealth Transportation Board. VDOT has thus far reimbursed the county for our expenses in accordance with the agreement. Staff believes VDOT will continue the reimbursements. Sufficient funds remain in the project contingency to cover the increase in the noise wall cost. No additional appropriations will be required. Recommendation: Staff recommends the Board authorize the County Administrator, subject to VDOT and FHWA concurrence, to execute a noise wall change order up to $1.5 million. District: Clover Hill and Matoaca 000152 8 ~d~ CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 3 of 3 Meeting Date: August 22,2007 Budaet and Manaaement Comments: This item requests that the Board approve a change order in the amount of $1.5 million for completion of a noise wall on the Route 360 road project. Sufficient funding has already been appropriated for the Route 360 project. Preparer: Allan M. Carmody Title: Director. Budoet and Manaaement 0001_53 '. p. r- ~.:. If~ ~:J.~ - ..-=- ,..1 I;j _ ..~ ~ W-l.. ~l ~~ 'tJ!."~ II) ~ ~;;f. I :tl tJ;. .,. ~.~..,Il ~-=! - , u ~ ~ ~ L-.'.:i-;.- ~.-..,( r · "; ~~~>>f~ ~, ~ -. Jil: t) I.~':: ,~. L1 . ~ I '!II A~...:;i; ..~ 'E I ~ a-:-.z · ~~~~ ~_ ,- ~'~~. .~%~:I ~)i":f~ . ~ ~ II' - . ~ "J'I; iI.. '.ol.:! 7......, (~~l !'IiiI~'" ~ ~~~ ~ ~ ~ ._ ) i ,.~ ~ .. .., '" " ,--._ LG :}..:;J ~ ~;- ~ ~~.~ __ 4r-(:": ~~~~~ ~.. L~ ( d &:~~. -~~~ "':~l ~ · ._"t. ~.. ~~;n~ . ~"W":..L~- "'-\ l' . .. . · .' '~1" - r -.... .,. .. ~ ~ =--- . ':...... ~ ..~ . :!~. ...... ~. ~ ru. -.:. .(1 I..:-=- ~ ="- - ,. ~ L · ~. ...... _~ ~ ~ ~ ~.~. ~ ~ -::I.' · ~ ..",; I ~" '";I.: . ~ ~ d~',;..... ..,... · - M .p~ · ~!? L ~ · '; '=":.;". 'i . · · ~ ~ "J · U>:'...:....,. 'r.~:'-. .. "~ · ~ 1r ~ . [ ~ -,... U:tsi ...t:.I'I ~~~. ~: ~ ~"""'11: ..~VS.;~ li ... ~ I 'l ").'f j.'J '" -. .~. ~) i;:'" ,~~...':;;;.:1~:~i'~~ ~~~ ~tl1 ~ . i... ? f~ 0. 1~.Ic L'~" ~ 1~-or1D! F ~~ i ,': · ".f C'" ?\"" I....:.. '=1 ~ ~ ~ ',~ ~ TI..!i: ' · ...~. i ~~~l.r--J r ~::: .tJ) ~ If -( ~ .. Po'''' ..:..:.;~ II If:I1IS!I ~1..-r ,'I!;: ;:!'Ill I ;:["=' '" '..:: ~ 1ii:- I P I ~ ~ ,i;,r::;.:r ..... _,;.. . :.. . _' ~. ~~ ~ iii:; ';..., ." ... ,}o. '!I . i-..:o: ... .. .. -="1 ~_ ~. ..... rJ.:f.. ~ ~ ~' ~-.;/~C ~' ~ ."'_" 1':':1' lo!"P.. ~ · :"1: I.. :). ~p.'~j~'./~r~~ J4;~l~~:';~-'=~ -:~. '~.f.~~~ ~ ..-))'~"':~ff~~fr;~~d~}1s-rltr NW ~;~. z:: ~ "II~ ~ ~ ...... ~ ~ 'n.. .~~I=;' ~ ~ ~ I _~ ~'~:' ~ 1'1':" ~~~ : ~~I:' :..~"'-/.. t ~ J.""": . ~.: ~ ~ '-:.~'" ~.~ S ~ .:....~,; · 0:1'<< .~ · =t ,~ ~.;:.: -t ~ .-;1"./1 ~ · ~~I:i' ~ · J ~. ~ · ~"'....' .. oA' . II .~.~. .' I ..... :.. · ~~l' . .~. . .. . .. · =t. - ~-- . - I .I IJ:' 1"-": 11~ I'" l'~gr-; · ~( ~ lIP ... Ii ~~'p .- --, ~- ... ~ ~ ...:.. 'I .:= . .-:~~ I[ U1~.ri~. ~fi ~ ~. .l1~ l~~. ~~-=iI:~ ~~ ~II~ !to .... ..... 'I -: ....l r-.:'1 ~ ....~~, - -'or 1 ;.j~~ r.., . ~ r i ":-"t' · ~ ~ ~ ...,..i'..... :t.- _ . .. .. I:.I:~. . .. . ...:~.. -=,--:.'$.. . ..- . ... 1 :.. · Ii"- ..... -..,; I .. .- : ... .., . .... L ...... rv L .1"':"' R ...: ,. _ :Z" ~ :"-I .;, ~ - "t ..... r:I. ~~ II J.... L fiii ,'~ ~~5 ~;.- ~~-~~:~~~ ~ ~'- --- . I .- - ~ ~~..:-, Jr-:~ .. ./ - ~ .( .j . ... I - -:-i I - .., I: ...&.::- =-.. 1"'..- - ... ~ I&) CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Meeting Date: August 22,2007 Item Number: 8.C.19.a. Subiect: Initiation of a Conditional Use for Matoaca High School for a Computer Controlled Vari~ble Message Electronic Sign County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: gJ Board Action ReauestedV Initiate a Conditional Use for Tax ID 783-626-4767 to permit a computer controlled variable message electronic sign; waive the disclosure requirements; and appoint Bill Carlson, Athletic Manager for Parks and Recreation, as the Board's Agent. Summary of Information: The Honorable Mrs. Humphrey has requested that the Board initiate a zoning application for Matoaca High School to allow a computer controlled variable message electronic sign. Pre parer: Kirkland A. Turner Title: Director of PlanninQ Attachments: DYes .NO 0001.55 I~ ,\ Ii CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Meeting Date: August 22,2007 Item Number: 8.C.19.b. Subiect: Initiation of a Conditional Use Planned Development Application for Cosby High School for a Computer Controlled Variable Message Electronic Sign County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: C~ () Board Action Reauested: Initiate a Conditional Use for Tax ID 714-672-8571 to permit a computer controlled variable message electronic sign; waive the disclosure requirements; and appoint Kirkland A. Turner, Director of Planning, as the Board's Agent. Summary of Information: The Honorable Mrs. Humphrey has requested that the Board initiate a zoning application for Cosby High School to allow a computer controlled variable message electronic sign. Pre parer: Kirkland A. Turner Title: Director of PlanninQ Attachments: DYes .NO 0001.56 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 2 Meeting Date: August 22,2007 Item Number: 8.C.20. Subiect: Acceptance of a Department of Criminal Justice Services (DCJS) Grant and to Appropriate $100,000 for the Operation Expenses of the Community Corrections Services Dual Treatment Track County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Reauested: The Board of Supervisors is requested to accept and appropriate $100,000 from the Department of Criminal Justice Services (DCJS) for the operation of the Community Corrections Services Dual Treatment Track. SUmmary of Information: The Dual Treatment Track (DTT) grant provides $100,000 and will reduce the total cost to Chesterfield County in FY08 to operate the DTT from $338,100 to $228,100. The grant will allow for the continued operations of the Dual Treatment Track that provides the General District, Circuit and Juvenile & Domestic Relations Courts an alternative for adult persons diagnosed with co- occurring disorders. The CCS Department and Chesterfield County Mental Health provide services jointly. The grant provides partial funding for one of two Mental Health Clinicians assigned to the Dual Treatment Track and a portion of the DTT operational costs for fiscal year 2008. A request will again be made to the General Assembly for full funding in FY09. Preparer: Rebecca T. Dickson Title: Deputv County Administrator Attachments: . Yes DNO # 0001.57 I~ I~' I~l fi~~ CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 2 of 2 Meeting Date: August 22, 2007 Budaet and Manaaement Comments: This item requests that the Board authorize the acceptance and appropriation of state grant funds from the Department of Criminal Justice Services for the Dual Treatment Track program in the amount of $100,000. The grant provides the partial funding of costs associated with the treatment of adult persons diagnosed with co-occurring disorders. Funds reserved at June 30, 2007 in the amount of $175,000, contributions from Community Corrections Services of $14,119 and the Mental Health Department of $65,201 complete the funding. The total cost of the Dual Treatment Track program is $354,320. Preparer: Allan M. Carmody Title: Director, BudQet and Manaaement 000:158 I~ Q - CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 2 Meeting Date: August 22, 2007 Item Number: 8.C.21. Subiect: Transfer a total of $2,400 in Midlothian District Improvement Funds to the Police and Parks and Recreation Departments and to the School Board to Defray the Costs of the Midlothian Village Day Festival County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: G\ Board Action ReauesteV The Board of Supervisors is requested to transfer a total of $2, 400 in Midlothian District Improvement Funds to the Police and Parks and Recreation Departments and to the School Board to rent space and equipment and to provide services for the Midlothian village Day Festival. Summary of Information: Supervisor Sowder has requested the Board to transfer $2,400 in Midlothian District Improvement Funds to pay a portion of the costs incurred by the County to supply equipment; police and parks and recreation services; and school space for the Midlothian village Day Festival on October 20, 2007. The Festival is a long-standing event that is co-sponsored by the County pursuant to a written agreement and is open to the general public. The Police and Parks and Recreation Departments and the School Board have traditionally given assistance to the Festival and the requested funds will help defray the costs incurred by these departments to rent equipment and space and provide services and facilities, which the departments previously planned to provide. $300 of the amount will be transferred to the Police Department to provide uniformed officers. $1,675 will be transferred to Parks and Recreation to Preparer: Allan Carmody Title: Director Budaet and Manaaement 0425:72841.1 Attachments: . Yes DNO 000159 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 2 of 2 rent tables, chairs, a stage platform and other equipment, and to publicize the event as well as cover the expense of a U-Haul trailer to transport the items to the festival site. $425 will be transferred to the School Board for the cost of renting Midlothian Middle School and providing custodial services. This request originally came from the Midlothian Junior Women's Club. The County is legally prohibited from donating money to this organization. The Board is authorized, however, to defray the cost incurred by County departments and the School Board for civic events which the County has traditionally sponsored pursuant to a co-sponsorship agreement and which are open to the general public and serve a community-wide audience. For information regarding available balances in the District Improvement Fund accounts, please reference the District Improvement Fund Report. 0001.60 Page 1 DISTRICT IMPROVEMENT FUNDS APPLICA TION This application must be completed and signed before the County can consider a request for funding with District Improvement Funds. Completing and signing this form does not mean that you will receive funding or that the County can legally consider your request. Virginia law places substantial restrictions on the authority of the County to give public funds, such as District Improvement Funds, to private persons or organizations and these restrictions may preclude the County's Board of Supervisors from even considering your request. 1 . What is the name of the applicant (person or organization) making this funding request? Midlothian Junior Woman's Club (MJWC) 2 If an organization is the applicant, what is the nature and purpose of the organization? (Also attach organization's most recent articles of incorporation and/or bylaws to application. ) MJWC is a non-profit civic organization that is composed of women dedicated to service of the community through various community projects. 3. What is the amount of funding you are seeking? $ 2400-please see attached breakdown 4. Describe in detail the funding request and how the money, if approved, will be spent. The funding will be used to defray some of the costs of a stage, table and chair rentals, rental of the Midlothian Middle School and fee for security for our annual Fall Festival in October 2007- Dlj~ 2D 5. Is any County Department involved in the project, event or program for which you are seeking funds? Yes, Department of Parks and Recreation, Chesterfield County Police Department and the Midlothian Middle School 000:161. Page 2 6. If this request for funding will not fully fund your activity or program, what other individuals or organizations will provide the remainder of the funding? Community Sponsors/Patrons and the Midlothian Junior Woman.s Club 7. If applicant is an organization, answer the following: Is the organization a corporation? Yes o No ~ Is the organization non-profit? Yes Is the organization tax-exempt? Yes ~ ~ No No o o 8. What is the address of the applicant making this funding request? 1218 Ryanwood Court, Midlothian, VA 23113 9. What is the telephone number; fax number, e-mail address of the applicant? 804-379-3420 HOME. 804-560-4638 OFFICE, 804-347-8860 CELL, 804-560-2290 FAX. manclygambacini@verizon.net Signature of applicant. If you are signing on behalf of .n organization you must be the president, vice-pre.ident, chairman/director or vice-chairman of the organization. / bCl/dkl~' Signature 2nd Vice President Title (if signing on behalf of an organization) Mandy Gambacini Printed Name July 27. 2007 Date 0001.6'2 MJWG summary of Festival 2007 Expenses Expense Item Rental of Midlothian Middle Fee for off Duty Police Officer stage from Parks and Recreation Tables and Chairs from Parks and Rae Dumpster Rental Total Upfront Festival Costs Cost $ $ $ S $ 425.00 300.00 900.00 400~OO 375.00 $ 2,400.00 000:163 .... -. _ _.............. ___ '^ ^ ...-.,.. ^ ^ · ...... . ^ ^., I ^ It> J . ^ ~~ Ii CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 3 Meeting Date: August 22, 2007 Item Number: 10.A. Subiect: Developer Water and Sewer Contracts County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: ~ l,/ Board Action Reauested: The Board of Supervisors has authorized the County Administrator to execute water and/or sewer contracts between County and Developer where there are no County funds involved. The report is submitted to Board members as information. Summary of Information: The following water and sewer contracts were executed by the County Administrator: 1. Contract Number: Project Name: 97-0002 Magnolia Lakes Developer: Contractor: Tascon Ironbridge, LLC Buchannan and Rice Contractors, Inc. Contract Amount: Water Improvements - Wastewater Improvements - $411,559.33 $365,902.39 District: Bermuda Preparer: William O. Wrioht Title: Assistant Director of Utilities Attachments: DYes .NO # 0001.64 Agenda Item August 22, 2007 Page 2 2. Contract Number: Project Name: Developer: Contractor: Contract Amount: District: 3. Contract Number: Project Name: Developer: Contractor: Contract Amount: District: 4. Contract Number: Project Name: Developer: Contractor: Contract Amount: District: 5. Contract Number: Project Name: Developer: Contractor: Contract Amount: District: 03-0289 Mt. Pisgah United Methodist Church Trustees, Mt. Pisgah United Methodist Church J. R. Caskey Incorporated Water Improvements - Wastewater Improvements - Midlothian 05-0097 Rossington, Section 2 Centex Homes Castle Equipment Corporation Water Improvements - Wastewater Improvements - Bermuda 05-0403 Holly Haven and Holly Haven Section 2 D. K. Walters Builders, Incorporated Perkinson Construction Company Water Improvements - Wastewater Improvements - Bermuda 06-0096 Chester United Methodist Church Additions and Renovations Chester United Methodist Church R & D Construction and Excavation Water Improvements - Bermuda $29,550.00 $2,619.00 $151,804.00 $276,323.00 $14,543.00 $7,825.00 $14,316.00 000165 Agenda Item August 22, 2007 Page 3 6 . Contract Number: Project Name: Developer: Contractor: Contract Amount: District: 7 . Contract Number: Project Name: Developer: Contractor: Contract Amount: District: 8 . Contract Number: Project Name: Developer: Contractor: Contract Amount: District: 06-0312 Cambria Cove, Section 1 Centex Homes Castle Equipment Corporation Water Improvements - Wastewater Improvements - Matoaca 06-0409 Colony Park B. B. Hunt LLC Rhyne Contractors, Inc. Water Improvements - Wastewater Improvements - Matoaca 07-0010 Woodmont, Section B, Block H, Lots 7 & 8 Water and Sewer Extension Jeffrey T. & Emily E. M. Wright Couch Construction Company, Inc. Water Improvements - Wastewater Improvements - Midlothian $116,528.10 $335,906.67 $31,591.00 $23,232.30 $7,900.00 $35,900.00 000166 ~1 - CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Meeting Date: August 22, 2007 Item Number: 10.B. Subiect: Status of General Fund Balance, Reserve for Future Capital Projects, District Improvement Fund, and Lease Purchases County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator:~ Board Action Reauested: Summary of Information: Preparer: James J. L. Steamaier Title: County Administrator Attachments: . Yes DNO I # 000167 I BOARD MEETING DATE 07/01/07 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY UNDESIGNATED GENERAL FUND BALANCE July 25, 2007 DESCRIPTION AMOUNT FY2008 Beginning Budgeted Balance *Pending outcome of FY2007 Audit Results BALANCE $50,945,000 * 0001.68 Board Meeting Date 6/30/2007 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY RESERVE FOR FUTURE CAPITAL PROJECTS July 25, 2007 Description FY07 Ending Balance FOR FISCAL YEAR 2008 BEGINNING JULY 1, 2007 4/11/2007 4/11/2007 FY08 Budgeted Addition FY08 Capital Projects *Pending outcome of FY2007 Audit Results Amount 15,521,300 (14,889,300) Balance 1,097,798 16,619,098 1,729,798 0001.69 t)J)"'" = c: .- ;.... ~ 0 = ,.. Q.) ~< ~~ = ; ,.... 0 ~~ = c: 0.-0 ~ = a ~ ~< jIIIIIIM ~ oc 00. Q Z ;J ~ ~ Zt'- ~= ~= ~N >M' ON ~ ~ ~ = ~ gf ~< ~ u ~ ~ ~ 00 ~ Q "C ~ ~ ...... ~ c: ~Q ~ 0 ~.... = ,.. = c: ~ Q.) ~ QlO = = 0 = .- N ~ > .- ~ ,.. ~ ,.. c: U = = In r,j ~ fA o ~ ,.......t ",,'" ~ o o Vl 00 ~ ~ o ~ ,.......t "" t.r) fA ~ f'4') f'4') = f'4') 'f"""'II o o o t.n... 00 ~ "" M 00 ,.......t 00 f'4') = N r,j N 'f"""'II "" ~ ~ o o o t.r) 00 ~ (".l l.r) ,.......t 0'" 00 N ~ f'4') ..; = 'f"""'II o o o l.r) 00 ~ (".l ~ 00 l.r) l.r) 'f"""'II ~ ~ ~ ~ = = In ~ 'f"""'II \0 00 o ~... o o ~... (".l o o o Vl 00 ~ o o t.n... M ,.......t t"- N ""... ,.......t l.r) Q.) ,.... = "'Ct .- ,.... ~ c: .- ~ = c: .- .... "C ~ ,.= ~ ~ = - c: .... .- ~ 0 ,.. s ;.... Q.) 0 ,.... = .... ....... "'C = ~ ,.. 0 ,.... c: ~ c: .- 0 .- ,.... ~ ~ Q = U Q U 0001:70 Prepared by Accounting Department July 31, 2007 SCHEDULE OF CAPITALIZED LEASE PURCHASES APPROVED AND EXECUTED Outstanding Date Original Date Balance Began Description Amount Ends 7/31/07 04/99 Public Facility Lease - Juvenile Courts Project $16,100,000 11/19 $10,465,000 01/01 Certificates of Participation - Building Construction, Expansion and Renovation; Acquisition/Installation of Systems 13,725,000 11/21 9,125,000 03/03 Certificates of Participation - Building Construction, Expansion and Renovation 6,100,000 11/23 5,140,000 03/04 Certificates of Participation - Building Construction, Expansion and Renovation; Acquisition/Installation of Systems 21,970,000 11/24 19,690,000 10/04 Cloverleaf Mall Redevelopment Project 9,225,000 10/08 9,225,000 11/04 School Archival/Retrieval System Lease 21,639 01/08 4,362 12/04 Energy Improvements at County Facilities 1,519,567 12/17 1,383,317 12/04 Energy Improvements at School Facilities 427,633 12/10 306,953 05/05 Certificates of Participation - Building Acquisition, Construction, Installation, Furnishing and Equipping; Acquisition/Installation of Systems 14,495,000 11/24 13,465,000 05/06 Certificates of Participation - Building Acquisition, Construction, Installation, Furnishing and Equipping; Acquisition/Installation of Systems 11 ~960..000 11/24 11~155~000 TOTAL APPROVED $95.543.839 $79.959.632 AND EXECUTED PENDING EXECUTION Approved Description Amount Certificates of Participation - Building Expansion/Renovation, $22,600,000 Equipment Acquisition 0001.71. o ~ CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Meeting Date: August 22, 2007 Item Number: 14.A. Subiect: Resolution Recognizing Mr. John Grohusky for His Service as a Member of the John Tyler Community College Board County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: QJ () Board Action Reauested: Adoption of attached resolution. Summary of Information: The Board is requested to adopt the attached resolution recognizing Mr. John Grohusky for his service as a member of the John Tyler Community College Board. Preparer: Lisa Elko Title: Clerk to the Board Attachments: . Yes DNO # 00017~ RECOGNIZING MR. JOHN GROHUSKY FOR HIS SERVICE AS A MEMBER OF THE JOHN TYLER COMMUNITY COLLEGE BOARD WHEREAS, Mr. John Grohusky has served on the John Tyler Community College Board from March 1998 to June 30/ 2007; and WHEREAS, Mr. Grohusky served as Vice Chairman of the Board for two years and Chairman of the Board for two years; and WHEREAS, Mr. Grohusky regularly represented the College at the General Assembly/ at statewide events, and at Virginia Community College System events; and WHEREAS, Mr . leadership from experiences; and Grohusky a broad provided wise counsel base of business to and the College's manufacturing WHEREAS, Mr. Grohusky regularly interacted with students and faculty of the institution in order to be better immersed in the issues of the day and the life of the College; and WHEREAS, Mr. Grohusky led the Board in assisting the College in the areas of facilities management/ curriculum development, and student services; and WHEREAS/ Mr. Grohusky was an untiring and constant advocate for John Tyler Community College and Virginia/s community colleges generally. NOW/ THEREFORE/ BE IT RESOLVED that the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors/ this 22nd day of August 2007/ publicly recognizes Mr. John Grohusky and expresses appreciation for his service to the Board of John Tyler Community College, and to the citizens of the Commonwealth of Virginia. AND / BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that a copy of this resolution be presented to Mr. Grohusky and that this resolution be permanently recorded among the papers of this Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County/ Virginia. 000:173 I~~ tli ~~:I Ii CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 1 of 1 AGENDA Meeting Date: August 22, 2007 Item Number: 14.B. Subiect: Resolution Recognizing the Richmond Kickers Youth U12 Girls Elite Soccer Team for Their Outstanding Accomplishments, During the 2006-2007 Seasons and for Their Excellent Representation of Chesterfield County County Administrator's Comments: G~ u Board Action Reauested: County Administrator: The Honorable Donald D. Sowder has requested that the Board of Supervisors commend and recognize the Richmond Kickers Youth U12 Girls Elite Soccer Team for their superior achievements and representation of Chesterfield County. Summary of Information: Under the guidance of Mr. Sean Kastetter and his staff, the Richmond Kickers Youth U12 Girls Elite Soccer Team finished their regular season with a 10-0-4 record and tournament championship victories in the Potomac Memorial Day Tournament and the Kickers Club Invitational. The U12 Kickers Girls Elite Soccer Team were the champions in the VYSA State Cup Championships, and they represented the Commonwealth of Virginia in the United States Youth Soccer Region 1 Championship in Portland, Maine. Preparer: Michael S. Golden Title: Director-Parks and Recreation Attachments: . Yes DNa 0001.71 1# RECOGNIZING RICHMOND KICKERS U12 GIRLS ELITE SOCCER TEAM AND STAFF FOR THEIR OUTSTANDING REPRESENTATION OF CHESTERFIELD COUNTY WHEREAS, participation in co-sponsored sports has integral part of Chesterfield County's educational, emotional development for athletesj and long been an physical and WHEREAS, Mr. Sean Kastetter, Head Coach of the Richmond Kickers Youth Soccer Club U12 Girls Elite Team, has won his first State Cup Title in Virginia Youth Soccerj and WHEREAS, under Mr. Kastetter and his staff's direction, the 2006/2007 Richmond Kickers Youth Soccer Club U12 Girls Elite Team finished their regular season with a 10-0-4 record and the tournament season with championship victories in the Potomac Memorial Day Tournament and the Kickers Club Invitationalj and WHEREAS, the U12 Kickers Girls Eli te Soccer Team season champion in the Virginia Club Champions League, in the Spring 2007 seasonj and was Fall 2006 and runner up WHEREAS, the U12 Kickers Girls Elite Soccer Team competed in the VYSA State Cup Championship and were the champions, outscoring opponents 11 goals to 5, with a 3 to 2 win over VA Rush Academy White in the State Championship matchj and WHEREAS, the U12 Kickers Girls Elite Soccer Team represented the Commonwealth of Virginia in the united States Youth Soccer Region 1 in Portland, Mainej and WHEREAS, the team members included Blaire Amis, Allison Bortell, Tessa Broadwater, Miranda Carlson, Gina D'Orazio, Blayne Fink, Jayden Metzger, Elizabeth Patrick, Alexandra Pinkleton, Rachael Seiler, Chloe Starnes, and Elena Wirz. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors, this 22nd day of August 2007, publicly recognizes the Richmond Kickers U12 Girls Elite Soccer Team and staff for their outstanding representation of Chesterfield County. AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors, on behalf of the citizens of Chesterfield County, does hereby commend the Richmond Kickers U12 Girls Elite Soccer Team and staff for their Commi tment to Excellence and Sportsmanship, and hereby express their best wishes for continued success. 000:175 . . CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Meeting Date: August 22,2007 Item Number: 14.C. Subiect: Resolution Recognizing Mr. John Caleb Dodgen, Troop 800, sponsored by Bethel Baptist Church; Mr. Matthew Christopher Lennon and Mr. Christopher Lee Pherson, both of Troop 806, sponsored by Woodlake United Methodist Church; and Mr. Michael James McCabe, Troop 880, sponsored by Beulah United Methodist Church, Upon Attaining Rank of Eagle Scout County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Q:l. Board Action Reauestef~ Adoption of the attached resolution. Summary of Information: Staff has received requests for the Board to adopt resolutions recognizing Mr. John Caleb Dodgen, Troop 800, Mr. Matthew Christopher Lennon and Mr. Christopher Lee Pherson, both of Troop 806, and Mr. Michael James McCabe, Troop 880, upon attaining the rank of Eagle Scout. All will be present at the meeting, accompanied by members of their families, to accept the resolutions. Preparer: Lisa Elko Title: Clerk to the Board Attachments: . Yes DNO I # 0001. 71 WHEREAS, the Boy Scouts of America was incorporated by Mr. William D. Boyce on February 8, 1910, and was chartered by Congress in 1916; and WHEREAS, the character, provide fitness; and Boy Scouts of America citizenship training was and founded to build promote physical WHEREAS, after earning at least twenty-one merit badges in a wide variety of skills including leadership, service and outdoor life, serving in a leadership position in a troop, carrying out a service proj ect benef icial to their communi ty , being active in the troop, demonstrating Scout spirit, and living up to the Scout Oath and Law Mr. John Caleb Dodgen, Troop 800, sponsored by Bethel Baptist Church; Mr. Matthew Christopher Lennon and Mr. Christopher Lee Pherson, both of Troop 806, sponsored by Woodlake United Methodist Church; and Mr. Michael James McCabe, Troop 880, sponsored by Beulah United Methodist Church have accomplished those high standards of commitment and have reached the long-sought goal of Eagle Scout which is received by only four percent of those individuals entering the Scouting movement; and WHEREAS, growing through their experiences in Scouting, learning the lessons of responsible citizenship, and endeavoring to prepare themselves for roles as leaders in society, Caleb, Matthew, Christopher and Michael have distinguished themselves as members of a new generation of prepared young citizens of whom we can all be very proud. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors, this 22nd day of August 2007, hereby extends its congratulations to Mr. John Caleb Dodgen, Mr. Matthew Christopher Lennon, Mr. Christopher Lee Pherson and Mr. Michael James McCabe, and acknowledges the good fortune of the county to have such outstanding young men as its citizens. 000:177 ~~ Ell ~J!Y:';/} CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 2 Meeting Date: August 22,2007 Item Number: 16.A. Subiect: Public Hearing to Consider Adoption of an Ordinance Creating the Lower Magnolia Green Community Development Authority County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: d Board Action ReauestU' Hold a public hearing to consider adoption of an Ordinance creating the Authority. Additionally! staff requests authorization to proceed with design work associated with the widening of Woolridge Road across Swift Creek Reservoir! from the terminus of the CDA road improvements to Genito Road. Summary of Information: In June, the Board scheduled a public hearing to consider the adoption of an ordinance to create the Lower Magnolia Green Community Development Authority that encompasses the proposed Magnolia Green development. The landowner has submitted a petition requesting that the Board create a CDA to fund road improvements to serve the development and surrounding area. The petitioning landowner is the owner of the Lower Magnolia Green property! and the district covered by the CDA would include only the Lower Magnolia Green property (see attached map of the District). The advantage of a CDA is that road improvements can be constructed immediately, in advance of available public funds! paid for with bonds! and the bonds are repaid through assessments on the property contained within the CDA. Preparer: Francis M. Pitaro Title: ActinQ Deputv County Administrator Attachments: . Yes DNa # 0001. 78 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 2 of 2 The petitioning landowner proposes to use the CDA to construct up to $27.1 million in road improvements to Otterdale Road, Woolridge Road and Hull Street Road: Otterdale Road will be widened from two lanes to four lanes for a distance of approximately 1.18 miles, from its intersection with Hull Street Road to its intersection with Woolridge Road. Woolridge Road will be widened from two lanes to four lanes for a distance of approximately 2.73 miles, from its intersection with Otterdale Road up to, but not including, the western terminus of the causeway over Swift Creek Reservoir. Hull Street Road will be widened in an area that is generally adjacent to the Lower Magnolia Green development, and a traffic light installed, when needed. County participation in the project will include: Acquiring the right of way and easements required for road improvements to Otterdale Road, Woolridge Road and Hull Street Road. Obtaining all permits required from VDOT. All wetlands permitting and mitigation requirements. The County intends to widen (concurrent wi th the CDA road improvements) Woolridge Road across Swift Creek Reservoir, from the terminus of the CDA road improvements to Genito Road. The total cost to the County for the above tasks is estimated at $12 million. Source of funds for the County's participation will include state reimbursement for Route 360 Project (2004 Bond Project), available cash proffers and the Utilities Capital Improvement Program. At this time, staff requests authorization to proceed with the design work associated with widening of Woolridge Road across Swift Creek Reservoir. Once design work is completed, a request will be brought before the Board to appropriate state reimbursement funds and to transfer Utilities CIP funds, in order to proceed with right of way acquisition and road construction. In order to create the CDA, the Board must hold a public hearing and adopt an ordinance, a draft of which is attached. If the Board creates the CDA, the Board will then appoint five members to serve as the CDA's board of directors. 000:179 1 l~l. ~~. :{~~. ~I..-- ~ ' I) ? 1 .' ~ · _ r · _2 ;:'1 ...~ ... I - .. II:. - . ~ (""I.-.. · · I _ .- .....-......... )~. . .. .j ..~, ~. 'Zi"J; .~ ~~ ~~ I~ ~~\ :~ I.. :t;. I :J . .~~ :2~"::: ~~I~~ r~*~-l~ 4~~:':"~~~;i~~?~~~{~7J.~~.~/H~: I. I :.. Iii ~. · .:I., -=. · -9.. . ~ .. :-. · ~ r :-rl1 ..1;;. .. · · .: · · H ~ I \..:...:;.. _ :. - .. .. · - t- ~ .&;~ · : ~: .:. --I ~. ..::..:-:: ~ ..*1- .;~ ~~. \.. I .... ~=!I - t....'-.--:LI: · A. 1;.-. .. -=cr. r · .. .... Q; ~ · I ;-a.. - z:i ......~r r.. .t- '" .. - .~ ~ L .,;.. r::.::- . .. ~1~.: .~..: .. :-. ;:r -f.::- ;. .. r ~ ..I( ~::: ... - . . .:I - ~ J. r..... · ...:.. -..: ... I~ · I "-.1-_... y · .. . ra...:.... ,.- · ~ rA.. .--,....: . - - · - ~,... ~f;'. -. ~ PI ..::-.i.... ........ - ) t" .::l ~ '".-:,. ~~ ~:.!! !Ii ~ ~ ~~... .,;...., .... ~.~y.. . ..:..... g..-:- I! ~III- ....~ ~~..I(: ..:.i-: - ~ ~ :[ y;[ -.v :"I. ~ -' L -;~~r"" ;-.;; I:;; .. -:;;:l ...... 1-:1 ,~ ... I . -I.: . I 'I . ~. · :. J I ~_""1II1 . .....~... ~.. ...(... . .;...~....: tIfQ .;:.~~ . .. ~i: ~ ....... ~ ~...." I I. · It-~..c ~~ (p~~! ~~~~ _"I ~~~~ ~:~ ~~.'i ~ !If~.I..,..~ 1':'-1 ~~.:"'~~I~~S II.'~ .. r::~'" 11J3~~.'; ..~ ~ .... .... · ~~ Im~ ~ ~ 11t.~ .~J.j.. --- ~(;] ... 'jj ~ r ~ ... .. .: II_.J . .... · . .'IIi i~ I L ~.I rt~ .I~ ~ y: (l1li · rt . .1 ~ ~ .- J ~... I..... ~~~ ~ ..~~ :-'~~>:~ ~ r. r. .=..::-:- ~ .. ~ ~ ~ ....,~ ....::1 r ~ _ ~~ :t.:! ~.~ ~ ~ ,,~ r :I: ~ t ~ .....~ r;~ 1th....1 I ~.li=I ":'1 H I t 1I::v:.: ..:r: =-:- ~~; tI C" ~. ~ I ~.. 'I r .~ 'W-: ~ -' ... -"':-t. ~+tJ ~ :- ~-=:=~ ~(~~~ ....,W }. . 1- , ~~._"? .: ~\~.. ~ ~.. TL ~... 9. ..... :.~ ~ ~ ~ .::;, - ,.-: S "I ~ ~ ~ iiY_ : r~~ ~ .:1 · r:.. .. ... '1 too ~ ~ i--'I'" .~..l-...r ~~.. .. _, .: ~ =-:.... I" : .. ... ~. ...", I":- · -.L. ~ ,~ ~ .... .... - ~.1.1 ~:": + ~~ ~ - :'I~~ .. ....... ,.. - ~..:. u~ ~ _ I ~ ::... ~...'~,,::~_. ;~ d ~ ~J~"..I~~ LI_~. ~ ~:I ~:~J:- ~ ; ~ ~.~ ... :t..:~ .... I~~. ~ ~ ., ~~ ~.J..:. ~ ~ · tfJ ...~:. IrI ~ .... -....,' ....~..." ~ :-IL...... · -$.A= . ... · .. (.. l'" oil ~~ .i" · :" ( . . ~ -~. · · -...::.. ...ob.... I~ ~. ........ ..c": ~!II ~ :;_. .-. ...~ WZ ~ ~ , __._ ~.. .i="- -. .. · I . ... .... , .. :. I . I: ... 'I -i 1.-.: 1"1 l1li .. .. ~ ...... _____ f: ~ :I ~. ~ ... ...:. .::-' ~ .. ~ ~J~ ;.~ ~~"!l~ =.~ {~ .1..l ~t...~~ ~-:~.y=~_. ~ :~~~~~ I~~J:IIA ~~~ ..~~t .; ..-1 . ~ ... ~ -..;., . ..... :..: ~~ .., · .~!~. · ~...~ '. 1 ~ "i" ri;;:, :!r( , .. ~ :.t.... 'k...':' I;: - -- II: I ~ .J .. 18. oQo::. ~ -:"t .. ~. :::;r. ~ .......:l"= - ~ ~ : r):: -. ...:!J -..... ..:..::.-. ~ ~ · ... - '2 · ). ~ lJ · 'I. of, I · ~~ -:Jf ~:~ ~., ~~....- ~ ... ~ ~ l ~:! .:~..- i~..: J~.=. .. ~ II. ..~. ___.. .....~. :.. ~ 'I ;r;.. _ ... · ..,... I. .. ...... ~ . ;l~ ..-T::.~~' ;:. .:-- ,.~ · · "~r.. ~ . .. . _. .. . ... I · . r. ...~.- - .:.. . ...... -.:.. II" · 'I'" .- ~: .. , -.;- .. :....,) ~.:- ~.. :... : :- ~ .-: . : .:: .: .. :.':... - -=-.",. · ,.. ~ =- · I ...'~ ~..';;. . =- ~ 'I--:V; 1 . :7Ll..... ,!'. r--. ~.. I: .. ~-.:- · A._~~" \ ~ ......r: I. - ~. ,.:...;.:..u... ~. , ~.. .r;,... - -) =: ~ Y.. .. .. ...... ~ ---= · :.. · · ... .... . .; ...~ !! ... ~...-. - · . (: :-.r :: ~ .11 J ..:- r · .. -::- -.; .... - ...... r ~F -.~ · ~I.,.!.;........ .... -~ p-~. :.:: I.. .._ .--="":w -- ~. - · ... --=.... .i -.::. .-f...... _. .,~.. ..' ~.... .1 ~ I" . ~ I -.--._r..:. 'I · ..L . .:- ..~ .... _ .. ... . ", · · ~ .. J.:! ". ....:...,.. I ~I ... .~ · .. I. ~ T :p · 1 ... ~.. ............ --7:.. -..1... 1 .. · -....... r) ." . .... ~ ~. .~. - ~:::'}j.I; ~ < 1; , ...!.1 ~ -:i -: .;.. ::-~ - ~ .; 1\,.-" ,.. ~ · ':- .~ -:. ~: · ':' - ~ ~... 1''- · · .. ; ~.~ · ~:.. jt~ ~~ =-.:. i..r.; ~ ~~~ · ;" .;. ~ If : ~ ~~ ~ -":.: ~~:. ~ ~ ~ ~ ' ..;!j. ~ ~ Wi, -; :~r ~~....~. ~ ~...~ ~ ~ .;~~ >..' ~ ... .. .11. I;:: ....~'I ~--IV'. ":'.'I~(... ~ J=-.. ...~;--". .'1 : 1~ l:...T ..I. ...:.).-.:.;"~i-~:' __:..;; _~~ I~'I -: ~:. "+:.:'1 I"~ ' .. .:. .. · ... ..... ~. ..% .~. .... ~ .. ....... --<"J'. . r:,::'" .. - · I ~ =-. ...:- - ..~ ~..... ...........:.:.. ="""" · ... · · · : I.! ~ - .. .. · I: .. ... ~. ...~ .. ~;JI"~ ..... ... .. .: :.:- :....:( = ;.: ~ ~ .IIr .. .~ ..~ ... .........-...s..&2I. ~_ ~ ...... .. ..... '!: .. d :".. .. · ,. - .....1..:. : · ... .. ..l:1li.-. · F- ......... I ~ - .. I _.......... .....~ ~.~ _ ~ .. .-:. . - -~ ~ no . . h ; j .. .... r.. .:- .. ~ ~ . ~.; l : ~.I"n ~::;. :,:~..-.:(1:: ?~ ~ .:~ ::: ... I" . I: .-;.~ ~ ~~. . · ...:. ~ .. . ~ --:. i. ... ~ ~. .. :. · ....... ..:-... I ....- c. I .. . .. I . -. _ . J. ..... w. '-'-.r~'::: ~ .. · .-[.-. - · ... · . ~:, ~ · rr- .. - .._.... .~ · · · - . ~ - .... I I" ......... -. -.... I.... I ~ ..... i..I: .. I. 1'1. ...... . . r I -:.. . · .. · · -... I,.r- :-.-.. · -:.,.~ ~ .;",... .'1 · ..._ I -~. .-. r'"1............. ... .... .. IL .. ..., - ::. .:.,,.... S. I .. -.. · .. - ......... ~ · T .:.. .... .. .. i" - .. · I ..... · ~. .. ~:f': -\, : =-...... .. :-...... .-: . · · · ... · .. .... .. I .... .. I )-.Ii ... . ..... ... ..1-. . ~ "r · · . r. . - ..~.. 'I - "= I .. .. : -:-.. .:. · · ...:-- I · 1 -- :.... .. 'I .-: · .. .:. 'I : ...;-..- .i.~: · .. .. ~ . "I · - ~ :,:. ~ .. !t~; ... .. I I.~ wi- · I~' . i .(... 'I' -: . -:_ . I · · 1-:- ~~ -i~ . ~~ .. :" :r..!: .. '-~.~ ..:li :'" ._~gI . " .... .. ~J=::: ~: .~- ~~I~ ~!;T ~ ;;-:'" j~ - :iI .-. a AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE CODE OF THE COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD, 1997, AS AMENDED, BY ADDING CHAPTER 9, ARTICLE XVII, SECTIONS 9-240,9-241, 9-242, 9-243, 9-244, 9-245, 9-246, 9-247, 9-248 AND 9-249 CREATING THE LOWER MAGNOLIA GREEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County: WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County, Virginia (the "Board") has received a petition (the "Petition") from Magnolia Green Development, LLC (the "Landowner") for the creation of the Lower Magnolia Green Community Development Authority (the "CDA"), and the Landowner has represented that it owns all of the land within the proposed CDA district; and WHEREAS, a public hearing has been held on August 22, 2007 by the Board on the enactment of this Ordinance and notice has been duly provided as set forth in Section 15.2-1427 of the Code of Virginia of 1950, as amended, and Sections 15.2-5104 and 15.2-5156 of the Virginia Water and Waste Authorities Act, Chapter 51, Title 15.2, Code of Virginia of 1950, as amended (the "Act"); and WHEREAS, the Board proposes to create the CDA in order to provide the infrastructure improvements described in the Petition; and WHEREAS, the creation of the CDA to assist in financing the infrastructure improvements described in the Petition in connection with the proposed development within the CDA district will benefit the citizens of Chesterfield County, Virginia (the "County") by providing needed infrastructure improvements to serve the land within the proposed CDA District and the surrounding area and by promoting increased employment opportunities, a strengthened economic base, increased tax revenues and additional residential, commercial, office and recreational opportunities, and will meet the increased demands placed upon the County as a result of development within the CDA district; and WHEREAS, the Landowner has waived in writing its right to withdraw its signature from the Petition in accordance with Section 15.2-5156 of the Act. (1) NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CHESTERFIELD COUNTY, VIRGINIA, that Sections 9-240 through 9-249 of the Code of the County of Chesterfield, 1997, as amended, are hereby enacted asfollows: Section 9-240. Creation of Authority. The Lower Magnolia Green Community Development Authority (the "CDA") is hereby created as a political subdivision in accordance with the applicable provisions of the Virginia Water and Waste Authorities Act, Chapter 51, Title 15.2, Code of Virginia of 1950, as amended (the "Act"). The CDA shall have the powers set forth in the Act. Section 9-241. Boundaries of CDA. The CDA boundaries shall initially include the property identified in Exhibit A, as attached to this Ordinance and presented to the Board upon \4647664.3 000:181 the creation of the CDA. The Board, at the request of the Landowner, in accordance with the Petition has excluded from the CDA district approximately 236.342 acres to be used for the construction of a golf course. In accordance with Section 15.2-5157 of the Act, a copy of this Ordinance shall be recorded in the land records of the Circuit Court of Chesterfield County for each tax map parcel in the CDA district and the CDA district shall be noted on the land records of the County. The Board, upon the request of the CDA or the Landowner or its successors in interest, may, by adopting an amendment to this Ordinance, release or exclude from the CDA district (i) at any time before the issuance of the CDA's bonds (the "Bonds"), areas designated by the CDA or the Landowner or its successors in interest, not to exceed a total of fifty-five (55) acres and (ii) at any time after the issuance of the Bonds, additional portions of the land within the CDA district as long as only de minimis portions of land not to exceed twenty-five (25) acres are released from the CDA district. Changes in the CDA boundaries pursuant to this Section shall not be made unless the CDA, the Landowner or its successors in interest has provided the County with evidence from an appropriate economic and financial consultant that such proposed reduction in the size of the CDA will have a minimal impact on the amount of the assessment necessary to amortize the anticipated Bond indebtedness. Section 9-242. Facilities and Services. The CDA is created for the purpose of exercising the powers set forth in the Act, including financing, designing and constructing, certain infrastructure improvements, as more particularly described in Exhibit B attached hereto as a part hereof (the "Improvements") in connection with the development of a mixed-use project consisting of residential, commercial and office components, with recreation facilities and other amenities (the "Project"). The CDA shall have all the powers provided by the Act. The CDA shall not provide services which are provided by, or obligated to be provided by, any authority already in existence pursuant to the Act unless such authority provides the certification required by Section 15.2-5155 of the Act. Section 9-243. Articles of Incorporation. Attached hereto as Exhibit C, and presented to the Board at the time of the adoption of this Ordinance, are the proposed Articles of Incorporation of the CDA. The County Administrator is authorized and directed to execute and file such Articles of Incorporation on behalf of the Board with the State Corporation Commission in substantially, the form attached as Exhibit C, with such changes, including insubstantial changes to the boundary description of the CDA district described therein, as the County Administrator may approve. The County Administrator is authorized to approve such changes or corrections to the Articles of Incorporation prior to filing with the State Corporation Commission as do not change the purpose or function of the CDA as set forth in this Ordinance and in the Petition. Section 9-244. Capital Cost Estimates. The Board hereby finds, in accordance with Section 15.2-5103(B) of the Act, that it is impracticable to include capital cost estimates, project proposals and project service rates, except as preliminarily summarized in the Petition. Section 9-245. Membership of the CDA Board. (a) The powers of the CDA shall be exercised by an authority board consisting of five members. 0505:75457.4 2 000:182 (b) All members of the CDA board shall be appointed by the Board by resolution in accordance with the provisions of Section 15.2-5113 of the Act. (c) The initial members of the CDA board shall be as set forth in the Articles of Incorporation for the terms set forth therein. (d) Each CDA board member shall receive such compensation from the CDA for his or her services as a CDA board member as may be authorized from time to time by resolution of the CDA board; provided that no CDA board member shall receive compensation in excess of $300 per meeting attended unless authorized by resolution of the Board. Section 9-246. Plan of Finance: Issuance of Bonds. (a) The improvements, services and operations to be undertaken by the CDA, as described herein and in the Petition, shall be funded from all or some of the following sources: (i) the Bonds to be issued by the CDA and (ii) special assessments to be levied pursuant to Section 15.2-5158A5 of the Act as more particularly described in the Petition and in a Special Assessment Agreement to be entered into by the CDA, the County and the Landowner or its successors in interest. Portions of the Lower Magnolia Green Property which are dedicated for public purposes or which are conveyed to an owners association as open space or common areas shall not be subject to assessment. (b) Upon the enactment of this Ordinance, the CDA will engage a professional administrator to prepare, with the assistance of the County, an assessment roll for all parcels of land within the CDA district. Such administrator will annually prepare a report which details the amount of the special assessment owed by the owner of each parcel of land within the CDA district. (c) The Bonds to be issued by the CDA may be tax-exempt or taxable and will not exceed a maximum aggregate principal amount of $35,000,000. The Bonds shall be issued as soon as can practically be achieved (anticipated to be during the first quarter of 2008) and the proceeds from the sale of the Bonds will be used to pay the costs of the Improvements as described herein and in the Petition, the costs of issuing the Bonds and funding any required reserves, and paying capitalized interest on the Bonds for a period of up to thirty-six (36) months after the issuance of the Bonds. If there are any proceeds from the sale of the Bonds remaining after the payment of these costs, such excess proceeds shall be used to prepay a portion of the Bonds. If the proceeds from the sale of the Bonds are insufficient to pay these costs, the Landowner shall be solely responsible for paying any deficiency, subject to the limitation contained in Exhibit B to this Ordinance. (d) If the CDA encounters problems in issuing the Bonds due to adverse market conditions, the CDA shall give notice to the Petitioner and provide the Petitioner with an opportunity to assist in issuance of the Bonds. (e) Any bonds issued by the CDA or any other financing arrangements entered into by the CDA will be debt of the CDA, will not be a debt or other obligation of the County and will not constitute a pledge of the faith and credit of the County. 0505 :75457.4 3 000183 Section 9-247. Recordation of Ordinance. In accordance with Section 15.2-5157 of the Act, the Board hereby directs the Clerk of the Circuit Court of the County to record an abstract of this Ordinance in its land records for each tax map parcel included in the CDA district and to note the existence of the CDA district on the land records of the County a Additionally, all subdivision plats on property located within the CDA shall contain a note referencing this ordinance. Section 9-248. COIDoliance with Representation of Petition. The promises contained in the Petition having provided the inducement for the Board to create the CDA, compliance by the Landowner with those promises is essential to the orderly development of the land contained in the CDA. Accordingly, the failure of the Landowner or its successors in interest to perform any of the obligations or comply with any of the promises of the Petition, including the Exhibits to the Petition, shall constitute a violation of County ordinance and until bonds have been issued pursuant to Section 9-246 of this ordinance, no building permits, other than the first 1,379 residential permits, shall be issued for any property located in the CDA while any such violation of this ordinance continues. This provision shall not apply to permits for Phase I of the Conceptual Plan for Lower Magnolia Green dated February 1, 2007, prepared by Timmons Group, entitled "Lower Magnolia Green Conceptual Plan" (the "Conceptual Plan"). Section 9-249. Conditions. In satisfaction of the requirements of Paragraph 4 of the Petition, the Board, by its adoption of this Ordinance, confirms the matters set forth in Exhibit D attached hereto as a part hereof. (2). This Ordinance shall take effect immediately. 0505 :75457.4 4 0001.84 The undersigned Clerk of the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County, Virginia, certifies that the foregoing constitutes a true, complete and correct copy of an Ordinance enacted at a regular meeting of the Board of Supervisors of the County of Chesterfield, Virginia, held on August 22, 2007. Clerk, Board of Supervisors, Chesterfield County, Virginia Exhibits: A - Initial CDA District Boundaries B - Description of the Improvements C - Proposed Articles of Incorporation D - Matters Confirmed by Adoption of Ordinance 0505:75457.4 5 0001.85 Exhibit A LEGAL DESCRIPTION All those certain parcels of land lying and being in Chesterfield County, Virginia, and being known, numbered and designated as Parcel "A ", 1664~283 +/- acres, Parcel "B", 122~976 acres and Parcel "cn, 109.331 acres and as shown on that certain plat of survey entitled "ALTAJACSM LAND TITLE SURVEY SHOWING 1896.590 +/- ACRES OF LAND LYING NORTH OF HULL STREET ROAD, U.S. ROUTE 360", dated March 10,2006 by Timmons Group, which plat of survey is recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Chesterfield County, Virginia in Plat Book 164, pages 87 through 94~ BEING the same property conveyed to Magnolia Green Development, LLC by deed from Salvatore J. Cangiano, dated March 16, 2006, recorded March 17, 2006 in Deed Book 7007, page 1800. Tax Man Parcel Number Owner Acrea1!e 703-667-2227 Magnolia Green Development, LLC 1664~283 703-667-2274 Magnolia Green Development, LLC 122.976 698-669-6309 Magnolia Green Development, LLC 109.331 Less and except a total of 236.342 acres designated as Parcels A through I on the Plat Showing Nine Parcels of Land Lying North of Hull Street Road, dated June 20, 2007 prepared by Timmons Group, which plat is recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Chesterfield County, Virginia in Plat Book _, pages _ through_. 0001.86 Exhibit B DES'CRIPTION OF THE IMPROVEMENTS Primary Improvements The realignment, reconstruction and widening, including required utility relocations, engineering design and related consulting services, of Otterdale Road from its intersection with Hull Street Road (Route 360) to its intersection with Woolridge Road, approximately 1.18 miles and Woolridge Road from its intersection with Otterdale Road up to the western terminus of, but not including, the existing causeway crossing the Swift Creek Reservoir, approximately 2.73 miles, as further shown on the map attached hereto as Exhibit C-l (the "Primary Improvements"). These portions of Otterdale and Woolridge Roads will be expanded to four lanes as median divided roadways, with turn lanes, substantially in accordance with the design specifications shown on the plan dated March 22, 2007, prepared by Timmons Group, entitled "Woolridge Road Typical Sections, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit C-2 as a part hereof (subject to modifications mutually agreed upon by the County, the Petitioner and the CDA), and shall include construction of required stormwater management basins. Landscaping shall include seeding of grass within the median and areas disturbed by construction activities and such other reasonable landscaping requested by the County up to $350,000, if sufficient bond proceeds are available. No sidewalks or bike lanes shall be installed and utility work shall be limited to relocation of existing facilities. $25,000,000 of the proceeds of the bonds will be allocated to the costs of the Primary Improvements. In addition, any remaining proceeds after payment of all other costs of the CDA, including construction of the Additional Improvements (as described herein) to the extent of the proceeds allocated thereto, shall be available for payment of the costs of the Primary Improvements. The County will be responsible, at no cost to the Petitioner or the CDA, for (i) obtaining all rights of way and easements required for construction of the Primary Improvements, including required utility relocations and required stonnwater management basins which may include off-site basins -and basins designed to accept stormwater run-off from property in the watershed but not included in the CDA, (ii) obtaining all permits required from VDOT for the Primary Improvements, including providing any bonds required in connection with such permits, (iii) all wetlands permitting and mitigation requirements for the Primary Improvements from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and the Virginia Department of Environmental Quality, including providing any required bonds, and (iv) payment or waiver of all County fees relating to the approval of all plans relating to the Primary Improvements. The Petitioner will be responsible for providing plans, satisfactory to the County, for the necessary right of way acquisition and construction both of the Primary Improvements and the Additional Improvements. The plans shall include, but not be limited to, utility relocation plans, storm water management basins, wetland delineation and mitigation and all other customary right of way acquisition and construction plan requirements. The plans will be provided to the County in a time frame acceptable to the County. The Petitioner shall also provide any re-design of the plans required by any governmental entity, including the County, provided that the County shall complete its review of each set of plans and make any 0505:75585.5 1 000:187 comments regarding redesign within thirty (30) days after the plans are submitted to the County and shall use diligent efforts to cause VDOT to so the same. The County shall have eighteen (18) months from the time it receives from the Petitioner plans sufficient for the acquisition of right of way for the Primary Improvements in a form that can be approved by VDOT (approximately 80% complete) in which to acquire the right of way and easements and obtain the permits (the "Right of Way Acquisition Period"). The 18-month period shall begin to run from the date when the County's Director of Transportation certifies that he has received plans which are in approvable form. If the County has not obtained the easements, rights of way and permits within the Right of Way Acquisition Period, the County will be responsible for payment of all costs relating to the Improvements in excess of that portion of the bonds allocated to the Primary Improvements or otherwise available to pay the costs of the Primary Improvements or, if the County is unable or unwilling to pay such costs, the Improvements will be modified, as directed by the County, as necessary to limit the costs to be paid by the CDA for the Improvements to such amounts. Generally contemporaneous with the construction of the Primary Improvements and subject to appropriation by the Board of Supervisors, the County, at no cost to the Petitioner or the CDA, shall construct an extension of Woolridge Road from the terminus of the Primary Improvements across the Swift Creek Reservoir to Genito Road as a four lane roadway. In order to maximize the benefits of the CDA to the County, the CDA will agree that any portion of the Primary Improvements which are to be constructed by others pursuant to zoning conditions or other commitments to the County may be excluded from the Primary Improvements to be constructed by the CDA at any time within nine (9) months after establishment of the CDA provided that the County agrees to cause the construction of such excluded Primary Improvements to be completed by the date projected for completion of the Primary Improvements by the CDA. In such event, the CDA shall pay to the County the net savings from elimination of such portion of the Primary Improvements which funds shall be used by the County for the extension of Woolridge Road across the Swift Creek Reservoir to Genito Road or for the costs incurred by the County relating to the rights of way and approvals to be obtained by the County for the Primary Improvements. Additional Improvements The CDA shall also construct additional improvements (the "Additional Improvements") consisting of (i) improvements to Woolridge Road from approximately station 10+00 to station 12+00 at the Woolridge Road entrance to Magnolia Green in accordance with the plans dated September 14, 2001, last revised July 31, 2006, prepared by Timmons Group, entitled "Woolridge Road Extension To Magnolia Green" (ii) improvements to Route 360 consisting of an additional lane of pavement along the west bound lanes of Route 360 and intersection improvements at the Chain Tree Parkway entrance to Magnolia Green from approximately station 10+40 to station 12+50, all in accordance with the plans dated December 3, 2003, last revised April 20, 2007, prepared by Timmons Group, entitled "Weeping Willow Drive & Chain Tree Parkway", (iii) improvements to Route 360 consisting of an additional lane of pavement along the west bound lanes of Route 360 in an area beginning at the western 0505 :75585.5 2 0001.88 terminus of the lane identified in (ii) and extending approximately one thousand feet west of Site Road D identified in the zoning of the Magnolia Green property, the exact location of such improvements to be mutually agreed upon by the County and landowner, (iv) improvements to Route 360 consisting of improvements at the intersection of Route 360 and Site Road D identified in the zoning of the Magnolia Green property (not to exceed 200 linear feet from the Route 360 right of way), the exact location of such improvements to be mutually agreed upon by the County and landowner, and (v) a traffic signal at the intersection of Hull Street Road and the Chain Tree Parkway entrance to Magnolia Green (across from Baldwin Creek Road) if warranted (estimated cost $200,000). A maximmn of $2,100,000.00 of the proceeds of the bonds will be allocated to the costs of the Additional Improvements and the Landowner will be responsible for payment of any additional costs of such Additional Improvements. General All work to be performed by the CDA and the County is to be performed as soon as practical in accordance to a schedule to be agreed upon by the CDA and the County and diligently pursued to completion. The Petitioner acknowledges that construction of the traffic signal described as Additional Improvement number (iii) cannot take place until VDOT has approve placement of a traffic signal at that location based upon VDOT standards for the placement of traffic signalization. 0505:75585.5 3 0001.89 Exhibit C PROPOSED ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION 000:190 ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION OF LOWER MAGNOLIA GREEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY The undersigned, pursuant to Chapter 51, Title 15.2 of the Code of Virginia, adopts the following Articles of Incorporation for the Lower Magnolia Green Community Development Authority and states as follows: Article I Name The name of this Authority is LOWER MAGNOLIA GREEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (the "Authority"). Article II Ore:anization Pursuant to an ordinance adopted by the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County, Virginia (the "Board of Supervisors") on August 22, 2007 (the "Ordinance"), the Authority shall be organized by the County of Chesterfield, Virginia (the "County") under the Virginia Water and Waste Authorities Act (Chapter 51, Title 15.2 of the Code of Virginia of 1950, as amended) (the "Act"), as a political subdivision governed by the laws of the Commonwealth of Virginia. Article III Members The affairs of the Authority shall be conducted by an authority board of five members ("CDA Board"). The initial CDA Board members are as set forth in Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated by reference. All subsequent members shall be appointed by resolution of the Board of Supervisors. Each member shall serve a four year term, except the initial members who shall serve the terms of office set forth in Exhibit A. The election of officers of the Authority shall be as set forth in the By-Laws of the Authority. Qualifications and appointment of members of the CDA Board shall be consistent with the requirements of the Act. The CDA Board shall have the powers and duties set forth in the Act and in these Articles of Incorporation and the By-Laws, to the extent that such powers and duties are not inconsistent with the Act. \4647657.3 000191 Article IV PrinciDal Office The Authority's principal office shall be 6700 Otterdale Road, Moseley, Virginia 23120. The Authority may conduct its business and maintain offices for such purposes at such other places within or without the County as may from time to time be deemed advisable by the CDA Board, and not in conflict with the requirements of the Act. Article V Authority District The land initially encompassed within the Authority is set forth in Exhibit B attached hereto (the "Initial Authority District") provided that the Board of Supervisors by amendment of the Ordinance, may release and exclude from the Authority district: (i) at any time before the issuance of the Authority's bonds: . land containing up to fifty-five (55) acres may be released and excluded at the request of the Petitioner, the Petitioner's successors in interest or the CDA Board; and (ii) at any time after the issuance of the Authority's bonds: . de minimis portions of the land containing not more than twenty-five (25) acres may be released and excluded at the request of the Board of Supervisors, the Petitioner, the Petitioner's successors in interest or the CDA Board. Changes in the Initial Authority District shall not be made unless the Petitioner, the Petitioner's successors in interest or the Authority has provided the County with evidence satisfactory to the County from an appropriate economic and financial consultant that such proposed reduction in the size of the Initial Authority District will have a minimal impact on the amount of the assessment necessary to amortize the anticipated bond indebtedness. Article VI Purooses and Powers The Authority is organized for the purpose of exercising all powers granted by the Act, including financing, planning, acquiring and constructing the infrastructure improvements -2- 000:192 generally described in the Petition to create the Authority attached hereto as Exhibit C. The Authority shall have all powers granted to a "community development authority" under the Act. Article VII Not-for-Profit The Authority shall not be organized or operated for pecuniary gain or profit. No part of the net earnings of the Authority shall inure to the benefit of, or be distributable to any member, director, officer; or any other private person, except that the Authority shall be authorized and empowered to pay reasonable compensation for services rendered and to make payments in furtherance of the purposes set forth in Article VI. Article VIII Amendment of Articles These Articles of Incorporation may be amended at any time and from time to time by the Board of Supervisors as now or hereafter prescribed by the Act. Article IX Relrlstered Office and Reeistered Aeent The address of the initial registered office of the Authority is c/o Edward B. Kidd, Troutman Sanders LLP, 1001 Haxall Point, Richmond, Virginia 23219. The initial Registered Agent of the Authority is Edward B. Kidd, whose business address is identical to that of the initial registered office and who is a resident of Virginia and a member of the Virginia State Bar. Article X Initial Members The names and addresses of the initial members of the CDA Board are as set forth on Exhibit A. Article XI Indemnification -3- 000:193 (a) For purposes of this Article XI the following definitions shall apply: (i) "expenses 11 include counsel fees, expert witness fees, and costs of investigation, litigation and appeal, as well as any amounts expended in asserting a claim for indemnification; (ii) "liability" means the obligation to pay a judgment, settlement, penalty, fine, or other such obligation; (iii) "legal entity" means a corporation, limited liability company, partnership, joint venture, trust, employee benefit plan or other enterprise; and (iv) "proceeding" means any threatened, pending or completed action, suit, proceeding or appeal whether civil, criminal, administrative or investigative and whether formal or informal. (b) In every instance in which the Virginia Nonstock Corporation Act, as it exists on the date hereof or may hereafter be amended, permits the limitation or elimination of liability of directors or officers of a corporation to the corporation, the members, directors and officers of the Authority shall not be liable to the Authority. (c) The Authority shall indemnify any individual who is, was or is threatened to be made a party to 'a proceeding (including a proceeding by or in the right of the Authority) because such individual is or was a member, director or officer of the Authority or because such individual is or was serving the Authority or any other legal entity in any capacity at the request of the Authority while a member, director or officer of the Authority, against all liabilities and reasonable expenses incurred in the proceeding except such liabilities and expenses as are incurred because of such individual's willful misconduct or knowing violation of the criminal law. Service as a member, director or officer of a legal entity controlled by the Authority shall be deemed service at the request of the Authority. The determination that indemnification under this paragraph (c) is permissible and the evaluation as to the reasonableness of expenses in a specific case shall be made, in the case of a member or director, as provided by law, and in the case of an officer, as provided in Section (d) of this Article; provided, however, that if a majority of the members of the Authority has changed after the date of the alleged conduct giving rise to a claim for indemnification, such determination and evaluation shall, at the option of the person claiming indemnification, be made by special legal counsel agreed upon by the CDA Board and such person. Unless a determination has been made that indemnification is not permissible, the Authority shall make advances and reimbursements for expenses incurred by a member, director or officer in a proceeding upon receipt of an undertaking from such member, director or officer to repay the same if it is ultimately determined that such member, director or officer is not entitled to indemnification. Such undertaking shall be an unlimited, unsecured general obligation of the member, director or officer and shall be accepted without reference to such member's, director's or officer's ability to make repayment. The termination of a proceeding by judgment, order, settlement, conviction, or upon a plea of nolo contendere or its equivalent shall -4- 000194 not of itself create a presumption that a member, director or officer acted in such a manner as to make such member, director or officer ineligible for indemnification. The Authority is authorized to contract in advance to indemnify and make advances and reimbursements for expenses to any of its members, directors or officers to the same extent provided in this paragraph (c). (d) The Authority may, to a lesser extent or to the same extent that it is required to provide indemnification and make advances and reimbursements for expenses to its members, directors and officers pursuant to paragraph (c) of this Article, provide indemnification and make advances and reimbursements for expenses to its employees and agents, the members, directors, officers, employees and agents of its subsidiaries and predecessor entities, and any person serving any other legal entity in any capacity at the request of the Authority, and may contract in advance to do so. The determination that indemnification under this paragraph (d) is permissible, the authorization of such indemnification and the evaluation as to the reasonableness of expenses in a specific case shall be made as authorized from time to time by general or specific action of the CDA Board, which action may be taken before or after a claim for indemnification is made, or as otherwise provided by law. No person's rights under paragraph (c) of this Article shall be limited by the provisions of this paragraph (d). (e) The rights of each person entitled to i~demnification under this Article shall inure to the benefit of such person's heirs, executors and administrators. Special legal counsel selected to make determinations under this Article may be counsel for the Authority. Indemnification pursuant to this Article shall not be exclusive of any other right of indemnification to which any person may be entitled, including indemnification pursuant to a valid contract, indemnification by legal entities other than the Authority and indemnification under policies of insurance purchased and maintained by the Authority or others. No person, however, shall be entitled to indemnification by the Authority to the extent such person is indemnified by another, including an insurer. The Authority is authorized to purchase and maintain insurance against any liability it may have under this Article or to protect any of the persons named above against any liability arising from their service to the Authority or any other legal entity at the request of the Authority regardless of the Authority's power to indemnify against such liability. The provisions of this Article shall not be deemed to preclude the Authority from entering into contracts otherwise permitted by law with any individuals or legal entities, including those named above. If any provision of this Article or its application to any person or circumstance is held invalid by a court of competent jurisdiction, the invalidity shall not affect other provisions or applications of this Article, and to this end the provisions of this Article are severable. (f) No amendment, modification or repeal of this Article shall diminish the rights provided hereunder to any person arising from conduct or events occurring before the adoption of such amendment, modification or repeaL [REMAINDER OF P AGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK] -5- 000:195 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned incorporator has executed these Articles of Incorporation as of the _ day of August, 2007, as duly authorized by Ordinance adopted by the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County, Virginia on August 22, 2007. By: County Administrator, County of Chesterfield, Virginia -6- 0001.96 Exhibit A Names and Addresses of Initial Members Art Heinz President Heinz Insurance InCa 9321 Waterfowl Flyway Chesterfield, Virginia 23838 (804) 216-1442 Dale Residence Deborah Girvin Vice President of Human Resources Shamin Hotels 11300 Taylor Road Chesterfield, Virginia 23838 (804) 777-9000 x124 Matoaca District Robert Ma (Mac) Bullock Director of Operations Getloadedacom 14221 Chepstow Road Midlothian, Virginia 23113 (804) 521-1718 Midlothian District Worth (Buddy) Whitfield IBM 3223 Regatta Point Court Midlothian, Virginia 23112 (804) 651-3521 Clover Hill District Manuel Flores Brig. General V.Sa Army (Retired) 2348 Coxendale Road Chester, Virginia 23831 (804) 748-6912 Bermuda District -7- Term of Office Commences Expires August 22, 2007 August 22, 2007 August 22, 2007 August 22, 2007 August 22, 2007 June 30, 2011 June 30, 2011 June 30, 2011 June 30, 2011 June 30, 2011 0001.97 Exhibit B Description of Initial Authority District All those certain parcels of land lying and being in Chesterfield County, Virginia, and being known, numbered and designated as Parcel "A ", 1664.283 +/- acres, Parcel "B", 122.976 acres and Parcel "C''', 109.331 acres and as shown on that certain plat of survey entitled "ALTA/ACSM LAND TITLE SURVEY SHOWING 1896.590 +/- ACRES OF LAND LYING NORTH OF HULL STREET ROAD, U.S. ROUTE 360", dated March 10, 2006 by Timmons Group, which plat of survey is recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Chesterfield County, Virginia in Plat Book 164, pages 87 through 94. BEING the same property conveyed to Magnolia Green Development, LLC by deed from Salvatore J. Cangiano, dated March 16, 2006, recorded March 17, 2006 in Deed Book 7007, page 1800. Tax MaD Parcel Number Owner Acrea2e 703-667-2227 Magnolia Green Development, LLC 1664.283 703-667-2274 Magnolia Green Development, LLC 122.976 698-669-6309 Magnolia Green Development, LLC 109.331 The property to be included with the Authority district is also illustrated on the drawing attached hereto as Exhibit B-1. Less and except a total of 236.342 acres designated as Parcels A through I on the Plat Showing Nine Parcels of Land Lying North of Hull Street Road, dated June 20, 2007 prepared by Timmons Group, which plat is recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Chesterfield County, Virginia in Plat Book _, pages _ through _. -8- 0001.98 Exhibit C Petition to Create Authority -9- 0001.99 Exhibit D MATTERS CONFIRMED BY ADOPTION OF ORDINANCE 1~ The Improvements shall be deemed to be in-kind contributions pursuant to the zoning conditions applicable to the Lower Magnolia Green Property, the cost of which will be applied to the $1,600 per residential lot cash proffer for road improvements as provided in the zoning conditions. 2. The Improvements shall be accepted by the County in satisfaction of all requirements, if any, applicable to the Lower Magnolia Green Property relating to the construction of (i) any portion of the extension of the Powhite Parkway and (ii) any off site improvements other than those improvements specifically described in Section 3C(4) of the 1991 Textual Statement approved by the County in connection with the rezoning of the Lower Magnolia Green Property in 1991. 3. The Department of Transportation has concluded that no further traffic studies will be required in connection with the development of the Lower Magnolia Green Property. Accordingly, no reduction in densities will be permitted or required under the zoning conditions within the Lower Magnolia Green Property as a result of traffic conditions. 4. Subject to the condition set forth in the letter dated June _, 2007 from the County's Director of Planning regarding subdivision and zoning requirements applicable to the Lower Magnolia Green Property, the development of the Lower Magnolia Green Property and the application of conditions of zoning applicable to the Lower Magnolia Green Property will not require any information from or action by (joint or otherwise) the owner or owners of any other property. 5. The obligations of the CDA will be independent from the obligations regarding the development of the Lower Magnolia Green Property and none of the work to be performed by the CDA will be conditions to the development of Lower Magnolia Green Property or the issuance of any approvals required for development of the Lower Magnolia Green Property. 6. The dedication of land required from the Lower Magnolia Green Property for school, park, library and fire station/rescue squad purposes being limited to (i) an elementary school site containing approximately 22 acres at the location shown on the Conceptual Plan (with the boundaries to be adjusted and the size of the site increased if a standard elementary school consistent with the requirements described on Exhibit D-1 attached hereto cannot be accommodated within the 22 acre site), (ii) a site for a library and a fire station containing approximately 10 acres within Parcel M as shown on the Conceptual Plan, (iii) a park site containing approximately 15.8 acres within the northern portion of Parcel CA as shown on the Conceptual Plan and (iv) in the event that public transportation is available in the area prior to 2010, a site for pickup and discharge of passengers that includes parking, at a location and in a size to be agreed upon by the Landowner and the County, in accordance with paragraph 3C(7) of the 1991 Textual Statement, it being agreed that the obligation to provide a pickup/discharge site would be satisfied by the execution of an agreement with the County for the joint use of 000200 commercial property along Route 360 providing for park and ride parking. No later than July 1, 2014, the Landowner shall provide road access to the 15.8 acre park site by a road accepted into the state highway system for maintenance. 7~ The amount paid in assessments to the CDA shall be in lieu of or credited toward, but not be in addition to, any impact fees which might be imposed by the County with respect to the Lower Magnolia Green Property. 8~ The County having confirmed that it is the intent of the current Board of Supervisors that the CDA be in lieu of any service district which might otherwise be imposed on the Lower Magnolia Green property, if a service district is to be considered by the Board of Supervisors that will affect the Lower Magnolia Green Property, the County Administrator shall recommend to the Board of Supervisors that the amount paid in assessments to the CDA be credited on a pro- rata basis toward any assessment imposed pursuant to such service district. 2 000201. -...--.......- /'.... GhesledieldlObserver Your Community Nl'II'Jflafll'l" Since /995 P.O. Box 1616, Midlothian, Virginia 23113 . Phone: (804) 545-75(Xl . Fax: (804) 744-3269 . Email: news@chesterficldohscrver.com . Internet: www.chcsterficldobserver.com ADVERTISING AFFIDAVIT Client Chesterfield County Board Of Supervisors NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ON PROPOSED ORDINANCE CREATING THE LOWER MAGNOLIA GREEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Notice is hereby given that the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County, Virginia (the "County") will hold a public hearing in accordance with Section 15.2-5156 of the Code of Virginia of 1950, as amended, on an ordinance (the "Ordinance") creating the Lower Magnolia Green Community Development Authority (the "CDX'). The Ordinance authorizes the creation of the CDA for the purpose of financing various infrastructure improvements in connection with development of a mixed-use project consisting of residential, commercial and office components, with recreation facilities and other amenities consistent with the Conceptual Plan for the Lower Magnolia Green Property dated February 1, 2007, prepned b} Timmons GroUD, entitled "- "Lower Magnolia Green Conceptual Plan." The CDA will encompass approximately 1,89~ acres i~ the aggr~gate, located in the Matoilca MagJstenal Dlstnct north of Hull Street Road (U.S. Route 360), approximately five miles west of State Route 288. A complete copy of the Ordinance and a copy of the Petition to create the CDA are on file in the County Administrator's office. The public hearing will be held on August 22, 2007 at 6:30 o'clock p.m., local time, in the County Public Meeting Room at the Chesterfield Administration Building, Route 10 and Lori Road. Chesterfield, Virginia. If further information is desired. please contact J. Harris Payne. Jr., Budget Manager at (804) 717-6398 between the hours of 8:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday. Description Ad Size Cost (per issue) $375.00 CHESTERFIELD OBSERVER This is to certify that the attached legal notice was published by Chesterfield Observer in the county of Chesterfield, state of Virginia, on the following date(s): 7/18/2007, 7/25/2007 & 8/01/2007 cQnd day of Lower Magnolia Green 1 col. x 9.5" , o,.............'?Jy ...- ..... '" Fl y p'J ...... -~,#.,. I.'......, ,""" The hearing is held at a public facility '", designed to be accessible to persons with BILL. PLEASE PAY FROM INVOICE. THANKYOU. disabilities. Any persons with questions on . , The Observer, Inc. Publisher of Sworn to and subscribed before me this ALl,gLlS t- dJ~-t Legal Affiant ,2007. the accessibility of the facility or need for reasonable accommodations should contact Lisa Elko, Clerk to the Board, at (804) 748- )vember 30, 2010 1200. Persons needing interpreter services for the deaf must notify the Clerk to the Board, no later than August 17. 2007. ~ ~61 ~n.~~ CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 2 Meeting Date: August 22, 2007 Item Number: 16.8. Subiect: Public Hearing to Consider the Upper Swift Creek Plan Amendment and Companion Ordinance Amendments County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: m........... {/ Board Action Reauested: Adopt the Upper Swift Creek Plan amendment and companion ordinance amendments. Summary of Information: At a Planning Commission meeting on July 19, 2007, the Planning Commission recommended the following: The Commission recommended the following amendments to the Upper Swift Creek Plan amendment: 1. Amendment to the Plan to provide level of service standards for roads. 2. Amendment to the Plan to provide level of service standards for public schools. Preparer: Kirkland A~ Turner Title: Director of PlanninQ Attachments: . Yes DNO # 000202 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 2 of 2 3. Amendment to the Plan relative to the Plan amendment to allow additional commercial uses for properties located on the south side of Route 360, between Route 288 and Winterpock Road between the AT&T Easement and Route 360, provided there is a buffer between commercial and residential uses. The Planning Commission then recommended denial of the Upper Swift Creek Plan amendment. The Commission recommended the following relative to the companion ordinance amendments: 1. Approval of amendments to the Subdivision and Utility Ordinances requiring mandatory water and wastewater connections for areas of the Plan geography suggested for uses other than deferred growth. 2. No recommendation on amendments to the Subdivision and Utility Ordinances prohibiting water and wastewater connections within the deferred growth area. 3. Denial of amendments to the Subdivision and Zoning Ordinances increasing buffers along arterial roads for residentially zoned properties. 4. Denial of an amendment to the Zoning Ordinance relating to water quality. The Upper Swift Creek Plan amendment, once adopted, will guide future development within the Plan geography in a comprehensive manner that embodies the principles of the Introduction of the Plan. The companion ordinance amendments, once adopted, will implement several of the goals and recommendations of the Upper Swift Creek Plan amendment. 000203 Chesterfield County, Virginia MernoranduIn DATE: AUGUST 10, 2007 TO: THE HONORABLE MEMBERS OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS FROM: KIRKLAND A. TURNER, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING SUBJECT: UPPER SWIFT CREEK PLAN AMENDMENT AND ASSOCIATED ORDINANCE AMENDMENTS In anticipation of your August 22, 2007, public hearing, please find attached the Upper Swift Creek Plan amendment and supporting documents, together with the associated ordinance amendments. Specifically, attached are the following: . The Upper Swift Creek Plan amendment, together with supporting documentation regarding the land use, transportation and water quality recommendations of the Plan amendment. Some of the background information is briefly summarized in the draft Plan document under the heading: 'Summary of Key Findings and Recommendations'. . Amendments to the Subdivision and Utility Ordinances requiring mandatory water and wastewater connections for areas of the Plan geography suggested for uses other than deferred growth. These amendments are similar to those previously adopted for other areas of the county and would implement Land Use Goal 1, Recommendation C of the proposed plan amendment. . Amendments to the Subdivision and Utility Ordinances prohibiting water and wastewater connections with the deferred growth area. These amendments would implement Land Use Goal!, Recommendation B of the proposed plan amendment. . Amendments to the Subdivision and Zoning Ordinances increasing buffers along arterial roads for residentially zoned properties within the Upper Swift Creek Plan amendment geography, from fifty (50) feet to 200 feet. These amendments would implement Land Use Goal 4, Recommendation B of the proposed plan amendment. . Amendment to the Zoning Ordinance to reduce phosphorous loading for development withing the Upper Swift Creek Watershed. Vested developments would not be affected. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact Jimmy Bowling by phone at 748-1086, or by email at bowline:i@chesterfield.gov. 1 000204 Blank page , 2 000205 Chesterfield County, Virginia Memorandum DATE: AUGUST 10, 2007 TO: THE HONORABLE MEMBERS OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS FROM: KIRKLAND A. TURNER, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING SUBJECT: UPPER SWIFT CREEK PLAN AMENDMENT AND ASSOCIATED ORDINANCE AMENDMENTS - PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDA TIONS On July 25, 2007, you set a public hearing for August 22, 2007, to consider the Upper Swift Creek Plan amendment and associated ordinance amendments. In anticipation of your August public hearing, the following summary of the Planning Commission's recommendations is provided. The Planning Commission, at a public hearing on July 19, 2007, made the following recommendations. Plannine: Commission recommendations - Unner Swift Creek Plan amendment The Commission recommended the following amendments to the Plan (see detailed language on pages 2 and 3): . Amendment to the Plan to provide level of service standards for roads . Amendment to the Plan to provide level of service standards for public schools. . Amendment to the Plan relative to the Plan amendment to allow additional commercial uses for properties located on the south side of Route 360, between Route 288 and Winterpock Road between the AT&T Easement and Route 360, provided there is a buffer between commercial and residential uses The Planning Commission then recommended denial of the Upper Swift Creek Plan amendment. 3 000206 Planninl! Commission recommendations - associated ordinance amendments The Commission recommended the following: . Approval of amendments to the Subdivision and Utility Ordinances requiring mandatory water and wastewater connections for areas of the Plan geography suggested for uses other than deferred growth. . No recommendation on amendments to the Subdivision and Utility Ordinances prohibiting water and wastewater connections with the deferred growth area. . Denial of amendments the Subdivision and Zoning Ordinances increasing buffers along arterial roads for residentially zoned properties. . Denial of an amendment to the Zoning Ordinance relating to water quality. Detailed Language Following is the language of the Planning Commission's recommended amendments to the Plan: Transportation -Recommendation A (page 11) All rezoning applications are expected to pass a test for Adequate Road Facilities. A proposed rezoning does not pass the test for Adequate Road Facilities if the nearest major road and/or existing signalized intersection that will carry the majority of the traffic expected to be generated by the future development on the property proposed to be rezoned will have a Level of Service ("LOS") of "E" or "F". The LOS shall be determined by the Chesterfield Department of Transportation or designee based on current traffic studies and other reliable traffic data. Further, a proposed rezoning will pass the test for Adequate Road Facilities only if roads to be impacted by the proposed development have adequate shoulders, or where roads with -inadequate shoulders are carrying, or are projected to carry, less than 4,000 vehicles per day. Goals and Recommendation - Schools (Insert on page 22 after Water Quality Recommendations) School Goal: Provide adequate facilities to relieve overcrowding and to respond to new growth. Recommendation - a~ All residential rezoning applications are expected to pass the test for Adequate School Facilities~ A proposed residential rezoning will pass the test for Adequate School Facilities if all public elementary, middle and high schools that would serve the future development on the property proposed for residential rezoning currently have adequate capacity to accommodate additional students to be generated by the proposed rezoning. Schools shall be responsible for determining 1) the current enrollment for each school; 2) the capacity of each school; and 3) the anticipated impact of the proposed development based on the maximum number and type of residential dwelling units or lots, including proffers for limited or delayed development. 4 000207 b. If any of the applicable public schools which would serve the future residential development on the subject property exceed 120% of capacity at the time of the review of the subject rezoning request, the proposed rezoning does not pass the test for Adequate School Facilities~ In addition, the proposed rezoning will not pass the test for Adequate School Facilities if the anticipated enrollment at any school to serve the subject rezoning will exceed 120% of capacity upon the development of 1) the property proposed for rezoning; and 2) all unimproved residential lots in the service area shown on approved preliminary site plans, preliminary subdivision plans and construction plans. c. When the capacity of any public school in the service area is determined to exceed 1200/0 under the conditions described above, and where such school is expected to be improved to less than 120% of capacity within one year of the date that the Board of Supervisors is scheduled to consider the subject rezoning request, the residential rezoning will pass the test for Adequate School Facilities. Land Use Plan map: On the south side of Route 360 (between Route 288 and Winterpock Road) Commercial uses including neighborhood convenience, retail, restaurant and personal service uses are appropriate for properties between the AT&T easement and Route 360 provided there is a buffer between the Commercial and Residential uses. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact Jimmy Bowling by phone at 748-1086, or by email at bowlingl@chesterfield.~ov. 5 000208 Blank page 6 000209 Upper Swift Creek Plan (Proposed) A proposed amendment to the Upper Swift Creek Plan, first adopted by the Chesterfield County Board of SupeIVisors on February 13, 1991. Status of This Proposed Amendment Version: Proposed plan amendment recommended by Planning, Transportation and Environmental Engineering Department staff as of April 3, 2007~ This is a proposed amendment to the Upper Swift Creek Plan, first adopted by the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors on February 13, 1991, then amended by the Board on March 15, 2000. The supporting documents referenced in this plan are not part of the plan and will not be published in the Plan for Chesterfield, but will be available through other sources. For more information on the status of the proposed Upper Swift Creek Plan, see the Planning Department website at www.chesterfield.aov/olan or contact project manager Jim Bowling at Bowlinai@chesterfield.Qov or 804/748-1086. Note: This section will be removed from the plan upon adoption Summary of Key Findings and Recommendations . Balanced, Orderly Growth: The proposed Upper Swift Creek Plan balances the demand for residential, commercial and industrial growth in the Upper Swift Creek watershed with a recommended orderly development pattern based on three important concepts: a deferred growth area in the northwestern part of the planning area, mandatory utilities extension ordinances for development outside the "deferred growth" area, and a prohibition on extending utilities into the deferred growth area. . Economic Development: The proposed Upper Swift Creek Plan encourages economic development by recommending that many areas along Hull Street Road and around interchanges be reserved primarily for employment and other revenue generating uses. . Residential Development Potential: Analysis undertaken in the development of this plan identified 16,186 dwellings in the planning area as of December 31, 2006, and projected that about 15,256 additional dwellings could be built on vacant land already zoned for development as of that date. This same analysis projected total residential build out for the planning area at about 51,094 dwellings under the 1991 Upper Swift Creek Plan, and about 43,434 dwellings under this new plan (not including any subsequent development in the recommended deferred growth area, other than the suggested development recommended by this plan). . Unzoned land Recommended For Residential Development: Under this new plan, only about 11 percent (4,956 acres) of the total parcel acreage within the Upper Swift 7 00021.0 Creek watershed remains vacant and agriculturally zoned, but recommended for development. . Deferred Growth: This area, which totals about 4,900 acres, is recommended for primarily very low-density (non-subdivision) uses, with other types of development deferred until the plan is amended through a subsequent review. . Water Quality: The plan recommends future land uses and initiatives that, combined with established and planned best management practices, are projected to result in Swift Creek Reservoir phosphorous levels not exceeding the established 0.05 milligrams per liter standard. . Transportation: This plan identifies transportation needs and recommends modifications to the county's Thoroughfare Plan. . Forested Views: This plan promotes protection of scenic resources by recommending consideration of ordinance amendments to increase buffering along arterial roads. . Mandatory Utilities Extension: The plan recommends that the utilities extension policy recommen~ed by the 1991 Upper Swift Creek Plan be made mandatory through the adoption of county ordinances to require water and wastewater system connections for most types of development. I. Introduction In April of 2003, the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors asked County staff to undertake a review of the adopted Upper Swift Creek Plan in response to concerns regarding the impact of growth on infrastructure, water resources, and the environment. In particular, development trends within the planning area generated interest in reviewing recommendations of the plan, first adopted in 1991. The Upper Swift Creek Plan is a tool that the county can use to shape the pace and pattern of development within the plan geography over time. Other tools are needed to address present, or near-term, growth issues. The plan also implements, updates, and refines selected recommendations of the 1991 plan based on what the county has learned and the area has experienced since that plan's adoption. The 1991 Upper Swift Creek Plan had as its goals: 1. Maintenance of Swift Creek Reservoir's water quality. 2. Balance between residential and commercial growth. 3. Conservati.on of environmental and aesthetic resources. 4. Variety of housing types and opportunities. 5. Provision of high quality, yet efficient public facilities. 6. Phased growth 7. Access to both active and passive recreational opportunities. The 1991 plan pursued these goals with recommendations for land use, phasing of development and public facilities. The county has subsequently implemented many of these goals through ordinance (such as the Historic Districts, Landmarks and Landmark Sites Ordinance, the Chesapeake Bay Preservation Areas Ordinance, and the Upper Swift Creek 8 00021.1. Watershed Ordinance), through amendments to other elements of the comprehensive plan (such as the Water Quality Plan and the Public Facilities Plan) and by using the adopted Upper Swift Creek Plan as a guide in the zoning process. The Upper Swift Creek Plan amendment, as outlined herein, continues and expands upon this work. Planning Area Boundaries The Upper Swift Creek Plan includes most of the geography of the 1991 Upper Swift Creek Plan. That small portion of the 1991 plan physically separated from the planning area by the 1998 Route 288 Corridor Plan is not included in the geography of this plan, but is included in the pending Robious Area Plan. The planning area includes most of the Upper Swift Creek watershed located within the jurisdiction of Chesterfield County. Magisterial Districts The Upper Swift Creek Plan geography lies within the Matoaca Magisterial District (about 82 percent of the planning area geography), the Clover Hill Magisterial District (about 14 percent of the planning area geography), and the Midlothian Magisterial District (about four percent of the planning area geography). How this Plan Works Chesterfield County's comprehensive plan, The Plan For Chesterfield, is used by citizens, staff, the Planning Commission and Board of Supervisors as a guide for decisions affecting the county, including, but not limited to, those regarding future land use, transportation networks and zoning actions. However, the Upper Swift Creek Plan represents only one part of the county's comprehensive plan. It is one of about twenty area, corridor and village plans, each of which focuses on managing and directing the future pattern of development within a specific geography of the county, taking into account the unique development pattern and development history of the area. As any plan geography is but one part of the larger community of Chesterfield County, the needs of a specific area must be considered within the context of the needs of the county as a whole. Other components of The Plan For Chestetfield are countywide plans, which address issues and needs on a countywide basis. These include: the Thoroughfare Plan, the Water Quality Protection Plan, the Public Facilities Plan, the Bikeway Plan and the Riverfront Plan. Some of these plans, such as the Public Facilities Plan, require a countywide review process to determine how limited county resources should be distributed. 9 000212 Background Analysis The Planning Department, in conjunction with other county departments, assessed existing conditions and development trends within the planning area. The results were summarized and shared with public officials and interested citizens throughout early phases of the plan development process. The following assessments and analyses serve as the basis for the Goals and Recommendations of this plan, and are available for review as supporting documents, A through I. . Supporting Document A - Upper Swift Creek Plan Amendment: Existing Conditions and Issues . Supporting Document B - Upper Swift Creek Plan Amendment: Land Use Analysis - Residential, Office, Commercial and Industrial . Supporting Document C - Upper Swift Creek Plan Amendment: Transportation Options . Supporting Document D - Technical Memorandum: Upper Swift Creek Plan Total Phosphorus Loading Analysis for Planned Land Use Scenarios . Supporting Document E - Existing Conditions, Environmental Inventory . Supporting Document F - Assessment of Biology, Habitat and Chemistry of Streams in the Upper Swift Creek Watershed, Chesterfield County, Virginia. . Supporting Document G - Upper Swift Creek Watershed - Riparian Buffer Analysis . Supporting Document H - Technical Memorandum: Construction Site Sediment and Total Phosphorus Loading . Supporting Document I - Education and Outreach Program Citizen Participation Planning Department staff, together with representatives of other county departments, met with area residents, community groups, property owners and businesspersons throughout the winter, spring, and summer of 2004 to discuss amending the 1991 Upper Swift Creek Plan. These meetings included: an education component on the comprehensive plan and its relationship to zoning, land development, and existing and future land use patterns; opportunities for citizens to share their concerns about existing development conditions and their desires for the future of their community; and opportunities for county staff to explain the limitations and opportunities, inherent in the plan amendment process, to address citizen concerns and desires. II. A Plan for Action The Upper Swift Creek Plan will help guide future development in ways that balance the interests of Chesterfield County's current and future residents, landowners, businesses and development community. Specifically, the Code of Virginia defines the primary purpose of the comprehensive plan as follows: To guide and accomplish a "coordinated, adjusted and harmonious development" of county lands "which will, in accordance with present and probable future needs and resources, best promote the health, safety, morals, order, convenience, prosperity and general welfare" of county citizens. The Upper Swift Creek Plan makes no attempt to determine the current or short-term marketability of anyone parcel for anyone use. Rather, it attempts to anticipate future needs for broad categories of 10 000213 uses throughout the planning area for the next twenty years. In addition, the Upper Swift Creek Plan does not rezone land, but serves as a guide for making decisions relative to future rezoning applications~ Finally, the plan attempts to suggest the proper relationship of land uses to one another and to the wider community~ Market forces (availability and price of land, location, character and age of competing businesses, site specific characteristics such as topography and visibility from roads, accessibility to roads, area demographics, etc.) will determine the desirability of a specific use on one parcel over another, as well as the timing for developing such use, based on the principle of 'highest and best use'. The zoning process will determine the appropriateness of such use on a case-by-case basis by applying principals of desirable land use development patterns and adequacy of public facilities embodied in the comprehensive plan. The Upper Swift Creek Plan does seek to promote a balance between residential, commercial and industrial growth. Such balance contributes to the area's long-term economic strength, to revenue generation, and to fostering a greater sense of community by recommending future land uses that encourage housing, services, and employment, which can interrelate to create a sense of place. To these ends, the Planning Commission and Board of Supervisors have incorporated into Land Use Plan amendments guidelines that promote development patterns, which facilitate the orderly, harmonious, predictable and efficient use of the 446.5 square miles of land and water within its boundaries. These guidelines, as they apply to specific plan areas of the county, are embodied in the goals and recommendations of adopted plan amendments. Goals and Recommendations - Land Use land Use Goal 1 : Promote orderly development patterns. The foundation of The Plan for Chesterfield is orderly development as an overall approach to managing the county's future growth. Orderly development means that future growth should be directed into appropriate locations within existing, developed areas with fringe development being an orderly extension beyond current developed areas. The Plan for Chesterfield strives to manage growth by fostering an orderly and generally predictable pattern of development and promoting a timely, orderly and efficient arrangement of public facilities and services to serve existing and future development. Recommendations A. Deferred Growth: Adopt the Deferred Growth area shown on the land use plan map for the western portion of the Upper Swift Creek Plan geography. Public water and wastewater should not be extended into this area until the plan is amended through a subsequent review. Providing a Deferred Growth area in the western portion of the plan geography will promote orderly development by discouraging leapfrog or sprawl development and promote efficient delivery of infrastructure to support growth. Activities within the Deferred Growth area should be limited primarily to agricultural and forestall uses with single-family residences permitted along existing area roads on large 11 000214 parcels. Other types of development should be deferred until the plan is amended through a subsequent review. The Deferred Growth area would discourage a leapfrog development pattern, with new subdivisions interspersed with undeveloped land. This pattern of development could overburden other public facilities, such as roads and schools, and adversely impact ground and surface water quality in the area for those area residents dependent on wells and septic systems. Adopting the Deferred Growth area in the western portion of the plan geography will reinforce current practices to promote orderly development and efficient delivery of infrastructure to support growth. B. Delay Utility Extensions: Adopt ordinance amendments designed to prohibit expansion of the public water and wastewater systems for uses within the deferred growth area until the plan is amended through a subsequent review. Development within the deferred growth area should be delayed until the plan is amended through a subsequent review. Prohibiting public water and wastewater extensions within the deferred growth area would be one means of ensuring that development is limited primarily to agricultural and forestall uses, with single-family residences permitted along existing area roads on large parcels, until such time that the status of the deferred growth area is reviewed through a subsequent plan amendment. c. Subdivision and Utilities Ordinances: Adopt ordinance amendments to require mandatory connection to the public water and wastewater systems for most types of development. Use of the public water and wastewater systems will allow a flexibility of development that would not otherwise be possible. This flexibility could include residential development of a wider range of densities and configurations than would be possible without public water and sewer, as well as some control over the timing of development as new residential projects would have to wait for water and sewer extensionsa Use of water and wastewater is currently negotiated through the zoning process. Amending the utilities and subdivision ordinances to require mandatory use of water and wastewater would eliminate the need for such negotiations. In addition, extensions of water and wastewater services would continue to be used as a tool to phase, direct, and/or pace development. land Use Goal 2: Promote economic development opportunities. The Plan for Chesterfield encourages the designation of key locations for economic development. Once area major arterial roads are built or committed for construction, the areas suggested in the Upper Swift Creek Plan for Regional Mixed Use and Regional Employment Center uses will have access to markets. Vacant land in these areas, as well as improved properties with potential for redevelopment, should be reserved for employment generating uses. Commercial development serving these uses and larger markets would also be appropriate near the interchanges. New residential development, as well as piecemeal, strip commercial development should be discouraged in these areas. 12 000215 Recommendation A. Employment Generating Uses: Use the plan to discourage residential and retail commercial development from locations the plan recommends for employment generating. uses. Retail and service uses that serve primarily surrounding employment center uses may be appropriate when part of a larger industrial and/or office development. The scale and mix of such retail and service uses should be proportionate to the needs of the primary employment center uses and should not be built until the employment center uses have developed to a density sufficient to support such retail and seNiee uses, without sueh retail and service uses having to rely on larger markets for financial success. Employment generating uses produce tax revenues, which defray the costs of providing services to county residents. In addition, such uses provide residents with jobs both within the county and close to home, thereby reducing commuting distances, travel timer air and water pollution and travel expenses. This, in turn, enhances the quality of life for working citizens and their families. Generally, residential and retail commercial development in proximity to interchanges, together with potential pressure for additional non-employment development in other parts of the planning area may, if not properly evaluated, limit opportunities for development of employment generating uses. However, opportunities will arise over time for development of new employment generating uses in areas where adequate access and mitigating road improvements can be provided. Commercial nodes that support employment generating uses could be incorporated into the design of larger projects, further contributing convenience and to reducing travel distances. This strategy may require that pressure to develop in some locations, for uses other than employment generating uses, be discouraged until market conditions become conducive to employment development However, such delay will benefit the community in the future by promoting, over time, a better-balanced development pattern. land Use Goal 3: Promote a greater variety of residential types. The Plan for Chesterfield encourages provision for a variety of residential areas, thereby allowing residents a choice of neighborhood and living environments. Recommendation A. Residential Amendments Project: As part of the Planning Department's on-going Residential Development Amendments project, consider various clustering, conservation/subdivision, traditional neighborhood design, and rural residential subdivision options as possible new Zoning Ordinance residential categories. The Planning Department has embarked on a project to update the residential portion of the county's zoning ordinance. Considering additional development options as part of the Residential Development Amendments project will offer opportunities to develop neighborhoods of unique character and sensitivity to the environment, while allowing reside~tial development to occur at densities suggested by the comprehensive plan. Some of these new residential types could include standards designed to better 13 000216 preserve some of the existing natural and forested character of many properties as future residential zoning and subsequent development occurs. Options to achieve this goal could include, but should not limited to, various clustering and conservation/subdivision configurations, increased setbacks and buffering along area roads to encourage preservation of forested views along roads, and connectivity between natural areas, between natural areas and neighborhoods, and between neighborhoods~ The existing forested landscape, stream valleys and natural areas of much of the planning area have scenic and passive recreational value which many residents and visitors find attractive. Opportunities exist to preserve the existing visual appeal of forested areas within the planning ar~a, and to provide connectivity between natural areas and neighborhoods, as new development occurs. In addition, opportunities exist to create a greater variety of housing types and lifestyle choices for county citizens. B. Residential compatibility: Continue to use the zoning process to encourage new residential subdivisions with sole access through an existing or planned subdivision to meet or exceed the average lot size of, and have a density equal to or less than, the existing subdivision. The Plan for Chesterfield encourages actions that stabilize and improve the health of existing. neighborhoods in order to forestall decline and blight and contribute to the overall health of the larger community. Residential developments of varying densities and lot sizes encourage variety in residential areas and offer County citizens a choice of neighborhoods, living environments and lifestyles. New subdivisions developing within the study area increase the availability of housing in this part of the county. However, such residential development should be designed to protect existing neighborhoods and enhance the larger community. land Use Goal 4: Preserve, protect and promote identified historic, scenic and natural resources. The Plan For Chesterfield encourages the preservation of historic, scenic and natural resources. Recommendations A. Adaptive Reuse of Historic Structures: Encourage the preservation of historic structures and sites by allowing adaptive reuse that is compatible with existing and anticipated area development. Specifically, historic structures may be appropriate for office or light commercial uses if the properly owner retains the structure, is willing to have it designated as a Chesterfield County historic landmark, and mitigates impacts of commercial use on surrounding properties. However, such designations should be exclusive of property required for future infrastructure improvements, such as road rights-of-way. Many sites within the planning area have historic significance. These include 19th and early 20th century homes and structures. The Plan For Chesterfield encourages the identification and preservation of lands, sites and structures that have historic 14 000217 significance. Protection of such structures and sites through adaptive reuse offers opportunities for preserving, presenting and interpreting the county's historic heritage~ The 1991 Upper Swift Creek Plan identified 21 historic sites and structures for consideration for preservation. Since then, five of these resources have been lost, and others are degraded and could be impacted by development. However, a number of 19th and early 20th century structures (homes, churches, stores, etc.) remain, providing opportunities to preserve a sense of continuity for the community and contributing to the area's distinct sense of history and place. B~ Forested Views: Adopt ordinance amendments to increase buffering along arterial roads in order to ensure that new residential developments along forested corridors preserve existing forested vistas adjacent to, but outside the ultimate rights of way o~ area roads. The 1991 Upper Swift Creek Plan suggested that development throughout the area should preserve existing natural settings and vistas. It further suggested that the natural forested corridor along Genito Road, west of Swift Creek Reservoir, should be maintained with special design standards and with deep, densely wooded buffers. An ordinance amendment would better promote this recommendation as development occurs. As the county continues to grow and develop, the forested character of some areas in the county, including much of the planning area, will be impacted by anticipated changes in land use patterns. However, by continuing the work begun with the 1991 Plan, opportunities exist to ensure that the existing forested vistas, as viewed from area roads, are preserved. c. Conservation/recreation corridors: Use the plan to identify conservationl recreation corridors. The planni~g area has several stream valleys with significant, undeveloped RPAs, much of which is currently protected from intense development by the county ordinances, as well as by state and federal regulations. These regulations are designed to preserve environmentally sensitive areas such as wetlands, wildlife habitat and floodplains, as well as to preserve mature trees and native vegetation. In addition, such corridors provide visual and distance separation between residential and non-residential development, as well as provide area residents and the employees of area businesses with opportunities for exercise, recreation, relaxation and education. Some Resource Protection Areas (RPAs) and other environmentally sensitive areas are already zoned and/or developed for residential and commercial uses. However, many others are relatively undeveloped and may provide opportunities for open space preservation and recreational activities through various cooperative public/private efforts~ Land Use Goal 5: Encourage land use transitions. The Plan for Chesterfield encourages land use transitions between less intense uses, such as residential neighborhoods, and more intense uses, such as commercial and higher intensity 15 000218 regional and employment generating uses, as a means of promoting orderly development patterns that are designed to protect neighborhoods. Recommendation A. Land Use Transitions: Use the plan to suggest land use transitions, including higher density residential and office uses, between lower density residential development and commercial and higher intensity employment generating uses. A hierarchy of land uses, from more-ta-Iess intense uses, provides the best protection to residential neighborhoods. Other protections (buffers, orientation of uses, and design standards which reduce nuisances such as noise, and light, etc.) are supplemental mitigation to the primary protection provided by physical separation between incompatible uses. Therefore, transitional uses contribute to the overall appearance and livability of the community. Portions of the existing land use pattern within the planning area, particularly along Route 360, are characterized by residential areas adjacent to older commercial strip zoning and land uses. In some instances, these residential areas do not have the benefit of buffers or other mitigating design features to lessen the impact of adjacent, commercial activity. However, in many places, encouraging greater depths of non- residential zoning can afford opportunities to provide land use transitions between more intense., uses and residential neighborhoods. In other places, where such depth is not available, developers may be able to work with nearby residents to incorporate design features that mitigate potential adverse impacts on nearby neighborhoods. 16 00021.9 Goals and Recommendations - Transportation The automobile is and, for the foreseeable future will remain, the predominant mode of transportation in the Upper Swift Creek Plan area and in the county as a whole. Most roads in the Upper Swift Creek Plan area are substandard, and will have to be improved to accommodate even minor increases in traffic resulting both from development within the county and in the surrounding regions. The county's Thoroughfare Plan identifies the future road network needed to accommodate future traffic volumes. It has been the county's policy for development to construct planned roads (other than freeways) to help mitigate their traffic impacts. State funding has been used to improve existing roads. Funding from the Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) has been inadequate to address existing needs, and the prospects for additional state funding are uncertain at best. Alternate funding sources continue to be investigated to address the shortfall between needs and funding. Transportation Goal: Provide a safe, efficient, and cost effective transporlation system. The county's Thoroughfare Plan, which was originally adopted by the Board of Supervisors in 1989, identifies right-of-way classifications of existing roads, and right-of-way classifications and general alignments of future roads. As development occurs in the Upper Swift Creek Plan area, in other areas of the county, and in the region, road improvements will be needed in this area to accommodate increasing traffic volumes and reduce congestion. Recommendations A. Thoroughfare Plan Modifications: Approve modifications to the adopted Thoroughfare Plan as shown on the map in Supporting Document C: 1. Increasing the recommended right-of-way width on the proposed North/South Major Arterial ("Woolridge Road Extended") between Route 288 and the proposed EastlWest Major Arterial just south of Powhite Parkway Extended from 90 feet to 120 feet. A six-lane road will be needed to accommodate future traffic volumes on Woolridge Road. The additional right-of-way is needed to accommodate the six lane road; 2. Increasing the recommended right-of-way width on the proposed EastlWest Major Arterial north of Hull Street Road, connecting Otterdale Road and a large planned development (Magnolia Green)" from 70 feet to 90 feet. This wider right-of-way will better accommodate traffic generated by the proposed land uses in this area; 3. Decreasing the recommended right-ot-way width of Watermill Parkway trom 90 feet to 70 feet. A grade-separation of this roadway is planned at the future Powhite Parkway Extension. With the construction of Woolridge Road Extended, the existing two-lane road will be adequate to accommodate the projected traffic volumes; 4. Deleting the proposed interchange on Route 288 south ot the Genito Road overpass, and the East/West Major Arterial connecting the interchange to Old Hundred Road to the west, and to Warbro Road to the east. The interchange was originally planned to help promote economic development. However, the land uses being developed around the proposed 17 000220 interchange are lower in density than were anticipated I and the interchange is no longer needed; 5. Deleting Hensley Road between Spring Run Road and Springford Parkway. This section of Hensley Road has been constructed into a cul-de-sac at its western end as part of a recent development project; 6. Deleting the proposed East/West Collector connecting Otterdale Road with Fox Club Parkway. As a result of a recent zoning case, this proposed Collector will not connect with Fox Club Parkway; 7. Deleting the proposed East/West Major Arterial connecting Winterpock Road to Spring Run Road just south of Hull Street Road. and replacing it by adding McEnnally Road between Winterpock Road and Spring Run Road as a 90 foot Major Arterial. This change is the result of approved zoning cases; 8. Deleting the proposed North/South Major Arterial that extends west from Otterdale Road north of Genito Road, crosses Powhite Parkway Extended, and connects to the proposed East/West Major Arterial. This change is the result of approved zoning cases, and is recommended due to topography and existing development; 9. Realigning the western section of the proposed East/West Major Arterial that currently aligns with Lacy Farm Road to the north, closer to the Norfolk Southern railroad line. The realignment is being considered in conjunction with a proposed zoning, and at the request of the developer and residents along Lacy Farm Road; 10. Realigning Powhite Parkway Extended and the proposed interchange in the Genito Road area. The realignment was requested by residents in this area (see Supporting Document C - Map: Realignment of Powhite Parkway Extended and Genito Road Proposed Interchange); 11. Realigning the intersection of the eastern end of Mount Hermon Road with the proposed North/South Major Arterial. The existing intersection is adjacent to the Norfolk Southern railroad crossing. Greater separation will better accommodate increased traffic volumes as the area develops; 12. Realigning the East/West Major Arterial connecting Otterdale Road Extended with Winterpock Road further to the north, and deleting the southern section of the North/South Arterial connecting this road with Beach Road. This change is the result of a zoning case in this area; 13. Realigning Mount Hermon Road north of Genito Road, and Mount Hermon Road Extended south of Genito Road. This realignment is necessary due to the location of a Church on the south side of Genito Road, and is consistent with the development of Horner Park; 14. Changes in the road network based on Magnolia Green development that include: 1) adding a proposed 70-foot North/South Collector connecting Duval Road west of Otterdale Road with the proposed East/West Arterial to the north; 2) shifting the alignment of the proposed Powhite Parkway; 3) relocating the proposed interchange on Duval Road to the proposed east/west major arterial; and 4) realigning other planned roads within Magnolia Green~ These roads are shown on the Magnolia Green Master Plan; 18 000221. 15. Adding Ledo Road as a 70 foot Collector~ This change is recommended due to the proposed land use in this area; and) 16. Providing cul-de-sacs on Otterdale Road at the Powhite Parkway Extension. This section of Otterdale Road has very poor alignment and no shoulders. The cost to reconstruct the road would be excessive. The proposed EasUWest Major Arterial and Woolridge Road Extended, which will be constructed in conjunction with new development, will better accommodate increasing traffic volumes. B. Development Conforming To Thoroughfare Plan: Continue zoning and development review practices to encourage development proposals to conform to the Thoroughfare Plan with respect to the construction of road improvements and the dedication of right-of-way. c. Mitigation of Traffic Impacts: Continue zoning and development review practices to encourage development proposals to include mitigation of their traffic impacts by providing road improvements and controlling the number of direct accesses to major arterial and collector roads. D. Bikeway Plan: As improvements are provided on roads identified in the county's Bikeway Plan, continue,to consider incorporating bicycle facilities. Staff has evaluated the ability of the current Thoroughfare Plan, when fully in place, to accommodate the traffic generated by total build-out of the county~ From a road capacity standpoint, the Thoroughfare Plan network, when completed, will adequately accommodate build-out traffic volumes. While the Thoroughfare Plan, when fully developed, will be adequate to accommodate "build- out" of the county, most of the existing road network requires complete reconstruction today in order to accommodate even minor increases in traffic. Most of the existing roads in the Upper Swift Creek Plan area are currently unsafe. The roads have no shoulders, poor vertical and horizontal alignments, and must be improved to safely accommodate increases in traffic. According to the Growth Analysis Report, the Planning Department has estimated that build-out of the entire county could take at least 50 or more years. Staff has estimated that it could cost approximately $3 billion countywide to upgrade existing roads, excluding freeways, to accommodate the increased traffic resulting from build-out. Approximately $400 million of those road costs would be in the Upper Swift Creek Plan area. Improvements to some of these existing roads may be provided in conjunction with development projects. Other improvements will need to be funded through public sources. Based on current VDOT revenue forecasts, the county anticipates receiving an average of only about $27 miUion per year in the coming years, countywide, to improve both Primary and Secondary roads. The prospects for additional state funding are uncertain at best. Even if the county were to receive $27 million a year for the next 50 years, there would be an anticipated shortfall of approximately $1.6 billion. A shortfall in funding for road improvements is not unique to Chesterfield County. It is impacting other localities around the state, and around the country~ Some of the road improvement funds available to the county are being used in the Upper Swift Creek Plan area. There are currently several road improvement projects, in and adjacent to the 19 000222 plan area, that are in the Secondary and Primary Six Year Improvement Plans, or that are otherwise funded: Hull Street Road - widen to 6 and 8 lanes from Swift Creek to Winterpock Road. The project is funded with state funds and county bond proceeds. Construction is anticipated to begin in the Spring of 2006. Hull Street Road - a project to add a fourth westbound lane on Hull Street Road from Route 288 to Old Hundred Road/Commonwealth Center Parkway. Construction is planned for Spring 2006. Bailev Bridae Road - three spot safety projects and one reconstruction project at various locations between Route 288 and Spring Run Road. One project has been completed~ Anticipated construction start dates for the remaining projects range from Summer 2006 to Spring 2010. Sorina Run Road - improve curves between McEnnally Road and Bailey Bridge Road. Anticipated construction start date is Fall 2007. Woolridae Road south of Crown Point Road - improve curve. Construction is anticipated to start in 2008. Several potential options have been considered for supplementing the road improvement funds received from the state. These options are outlined in the Supporting Document C: Upper Swift Creek Plan Amendment: Transportation Options This plan makes recommendations on modifications to the county's Thoroughfare Plan. Winterpock Road is currently identified as a 90 foot Major Arterial. Staff has identified the need for Winterpock Road to be six lanes wide (120 foot wide right-of-way) to accommodate traffic volumes at total build-out of the county. However, most of the property along Winterpock Road has already been "roadstripped". Changing the recommended right-of-way width on Winterpock Road from 90 feet to 120 feet to accommodate the future six lane widening could adversely impact current residents along the road. Staff will only seek the wider 120 feet of right-of-way in conjunction with new development proposals. Almost all roads in the county are the responsibility of and maintained by VDOT. However, Woolridge Road over Swift Creek Reservoir is a county road. The county has no road maintenance budget and no formal maintenance program. This section of Woolridge Road has three box culverts that are over 50 years old. The pavement section is substandard, primarily consisting of asphalt placed on top of soil. Any improvements to this section of Woolridge Road, estimated to cost between $8 and $9 million, would have to be funded by the county. The county's Thoroughfare Plan includes the extension of the Powhite Parkway from its current terminus, through the Plan area, to Hull Street Road. During the design and construction of the extension, the County should coordinate with the appropriate Federal and State agencies and private entities to ensure that the highest water quality standards and practices are employed so that the quality of the Swift Creek reservoir will be preserved. 20 000223 Rail Service One railroad line passes through the Upper Swift Creek Plan area. This Norfolk Southern line is currently in Lise, for limited freight service. The Richmond Area Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) recently commissioned a report on the feasibility of providing Light Commuter Rail transit service in the Richmond region. A section of the Norfolk Southern line east of the Plan area was recommended for use. The last recommended station was in the Midlothian Village area. There have also been discussions concerning a more regional rail passenger service. One part of the service would utilize the Norfolk Southern line to accommodate the Richmond to Lynchburg route. Improvements to the rail line would be necessary before the service could be initiated. There have been discussions about providing commuter rail service that would utilize the improvements to the line to extend commuter service further west than the Village of Midlothian. One of several proposed stations in the county would be located along Mount Hermon Road near County Line Road. The line would provide commuter rail service between western Chesterfield County and the Richmond International Airport. The proposal has not progressed beyond the discussion stage~ Public TransDortation The Chesterfield County Coordinated Transportation Program, Access Chesterfield, provides transportation services for any Chesterfield County resident who is disabled, or over age 60, or who meets federal income guidelines regarding poverty levels. Transportation providers are contracted by the Chesterfield County Access Chesterfield program to provide transportation service within the, Chesterfield County, Richmond, Petersburg, Hopewell and Colonial Heights metropolitan areas~ The program offers advance reservations for ride sharing with other passengers. RideFinders provides numerous transit programs and services in the Richmond region, including organizing vanpools in response to commuters' requests. RideFinders' vanpools presently serve locations in the county such as Brandermill and Midlothian. RideFinders also provides a matching service to assist commuters in organizing carpools. Bikewav Plan The county's Bikeway Plan was adopted by the Board of Supervisors in 1989. The purpose of the Bikeway Plan is "to designate a coordinated system of bike facilities to connect county and state parks with other high bike traffic generators such as schools." The Bikeway Plan is not intended to designate roads that are appropriate for bicycle travel, but to identify routes where bikeway facilities should be provided in conjunction with future fo"ad improvement projects. In the Upper Swift Creek Plan area, Old Hundred Road, Genito Road, Spring Run Road, Bailey Bridge Road, and a section of Otterdale Road are designated in the Bikeway Plan as part of the "bikeway network". In accordance with the Bikeway Plan, staff will consider including bike facilities along these roads in conjunction with future road improvements. Park-and-Ride Lots The Transportation Department has, on occasion, requested that developers consider including facilities to accommodate "park-and-ride" lots or commuter drop-off lots. These are areas that 21 000224 could be used by commuters to provide convenient places for carpoolers and vanpoolers to meet and park their cars. Developers have been reluctant to designate these areas, due to the requirement that additional parking areas also be provided. The Transportation Department will continue to request these areas when large-scale development occurs along major commuter routes. However, there is no intention at this time to make these areas a requirement. 22 000225 Goals and Recommendations - Environmental Quality The boundary of Upper Swift Creek Plan amendment encompasses a portion of the 64.0 square miles (approximately 42,000 acres) that makes-up the Swift Creek Reservoir Watershed. The watershed is located in the northwest corner of the county. The headwaters of the watershed approximately 7000 acres are located in Powhatan County. The watershed drains to the Swift Creek Reservoir, one of the county's three drinking water sources. The Reservoir produces approximately eight million gallons of water per day (design 12Mgal/day), providing drinking water to 30 percent of the county's citizens. The rolling hills, hardwood forests, 1 ,lOO-acre Swift Creek Reservoir and eight major tributaries draws citizens to live, work and recreate in the region. Approximately 7000 acres or 20 percent of the 35,000 acres contained within the county's portion of the watershed is developed~ The remainder of the area has been recommended by county plans for significant change over the next 20 years. Because of this growth, continued vigilance and improved practices and standards should be encouraged to ensure that development within the watershed contributes to the maintenance of water quality of the reservoir and tributary streams~ To address the problem of urban runoff, under the Clean Water Act, in 1992, the U~S~ Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) issued municipal storm water regulations. These regulations require large municipalities, including Chesterfield County, to obtain and comply with National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit to discharge storm water. In 1996, Chesterfield County obtained a Virginia Stormwater Management Program (VSMP) permit (also known as a municipal separate storm sewer system, or MS4, permit), issued through the Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation (DCR). The permit requires the county to implement effective management practices and enact a local stormwater program to include education and outreach, public participation and involvement, illicit discharge detection and elimination, construction site runoff cantrall post-construction runoff control, and pollution prevention. Environmental Goal: Maintain state and federal water quality standards of Swift Creek Reservoir and its tributaries. This goal reflects the importance of protecting the Swift Creek Reservoir Watershed and its resources to preserve the reservoir as a viable source of drinking water. In addition, protecting the natural resources associated with the Reservoir (Le. wetlands, streams, ponds, and lakes) provides for abundant habitat for wildlife and outdoors activities including fishing, hunting, birdwatching, and boating~ 23 000226 Recommendations: A. Promote land uses and development standards that are consistent with the protection of critical natural systems within watershed and that will facilitate maintenance of state water quality standards for area streams and Swift Creek Reservoir. In 1997, the Board of Supervisors adopted a Watershed Management Master Plan for the Swift Creek Reservoir Watershed. The Watershed Management Master Plan includes an in-lake phosphorous limit and establishes measures such as a reduced phosphorous standard for new residential development and the construction of regional Best Management Practice (BMP) basins to filter pollutants to ensure that the 0.05 mg/L in-lake phosphorus limit is maintained under suggested land use conditions. The limit was a threshold intended to protect general water quality and to ensure the viable use of the reservoir as a drinking water source. Without adequate management strategies for the reduction of nutrients to Swift Creek Reservoir, a variety of detrimental water quality and treatment problems are possible. These include excessive algal blooms, taste and odor problems, and depleted oxygen levels, all of which lead to increased cost of water treatment. Additionally, the adverse effects of pollutants on fish and other aquatic organisms may limit the reservoir as a recreational water body. The regional Best Management Practice strategy has been met with resistance by state and federal agencies. Therefore, other means of protecting water quality need to be developed and employed as a means of protecting the watershed, its resources and the Reservoir. The following recommendations will be implemented as part of the modifications to the county's Watershed Master Plan. · land Use Plan: Adopt a land use plan that is projected to result in future development that will have less of a water quality impact than the current Upper Swift Creek Plan (adopted in 1991 and amended in 2000). Annual total phosphorus loads were calculated for four scenarios, testing different residential densities for the future Upper Swift Creek Plan. In-lake phosphorus concentrations were predicted for each scenario. The results of this modeling showed that the land use modifications of the preferred land use plan anticipated by the recommended Upper Swift Creek Plan would have less impact on area water quality than the current, adopted plan. Modeling of the proposed land use scenario indicates that the incorporation of the deferred growth area is critical for the maintenance of the phosphorous levels within the Reservoir (see Supporting Document D). B. Protect and preserve the critical natural systems and areas within the watershed!1 which currently provide maintenance for water quality. While there has been a significant focus on the protection of Swift Creek Reservoir for the past fifteen years, there has not been adequate attention to the protection of other important environmental resources such as wetlands, riparian corridors and stream systems located within the watershed (Supporting Document E)~ The functions of these features are significant to watershed health, and any loss of these features will contribute to water quality degradation. While state and federal agencies regulate impacts on those resources, they are often impacted by permitted activities, and the mitigation of the impacts is allowed to take place outside of the county. Identifying the location, health, and loss or gain of these features is important to management of water quality. 24 000227 . Maintain GIS layers identifying the location of critical systems. . Evaluate these systems and identify those that are more critical for water protection or would benefit from rehabilitation. . Mitigation for loss of resources should be required to take place within the watershed where the impact has occurred. . Measures are needed to ensure that new development reduces the impacts to wetlands and streams and that the day-to-day activities of both residential and commercial uses lessen their impact on the important resources~ c. Improve, restore and prevent further degradation of those resources that are degraded. The report Assessment of the Biology, Habitat and Chemistry of Streams in the Upper Swift Creek Watershed, Chesterfield County, Virginia (Supporting Document F) presents the physical, chemical and biological water quality data collected by Chesterfield County's Water Quality Section from 2002 to 2005, focusing on the streams of the Upper Swift Creek Watershed. Monitoring information is necessary to assess the overall effectiveness of the water quality management strategies. Information generated from the county's water quality monitoring programs should be used to identify systems, which are in need of restoration or rehabilitation. This information should be used to prioritize those systems so that limited resources may be targeted to areas that would benefit the most . Stream and Wetlands - Restoration is a collection of methods for improving degraded conditions or preventing the degradation of a stream or wetland. The county should continue to actively pursue compensatory mitigation projects as well as grant funding for stream and wetland restoration. . . Riparian Buffer - The Chesapeake Bay Preservation Act requires riparian buffers along streams having perennial flow but does not necessarily address the condition of that buffer or its ability to maintain water quality. As part of a grant, to address the quality of riparian buffers, the county has recently completed an inventory of the riparian buffers within the Upper Swift Creek Reservoir Watershed (Supporting Document G). This inventory focused on the extent and quality of the stream buffer, to include vegetation types and tree canopy coverage~ As part of the grant, a new GIS layer has been developed that will facilitate the identification of buffers that would benefit from or require restoration. This knowledge will aid in directing funds and potential grant funding to buffer areas where water quality would benefit the most from buffer enhancement. Currently, restoration of these features requires cooperation of landowners. While many landowners recognize the benefits of these improvements, placing these environmental features within open space or easements of future development projects will ensure better protection and facilitate future projects~ D. Maintain bio'logical and habitat diversity and promote habitat connectivity by protecting undisturbed land corridors between watersheds and sub-watersheds within the Swift Creek Reservoir Watershed. 25 000228 As a result of the Resource Protection Area (RPA) regulations, each of the major tributaries within the watershed has a riparian corridor along their banks. However these RPAs do not provide enough land to promote habitat diversity and connectivity between neighboring watersheds. · Preservation of natural areas within and between residential developments will help maintain connectivity. . Educational efforts and enhancement of stewardship conservational roles on the part of the homeowners will help the county promote natural diversity and maintain connectivity of habitats. E. Minimize stormwater runoff through construction site design and site control. The erosion of land as a result of stormwater flows is detrimental to water quality because of the displaced sediment that is deposited into streams. The deposition of sediment loads is of particular concern during construction activity. Areas under construction are characterized by high production of suspended solids caused by erosion of unprotected, exposed soil during rain events. Excessive pollutant loads can be produced from construction areas if proper erosion- control practices are not implemented. Even with proper implementation of erosion-control practices, as required by the county, Total Suspended Solid (TSS) loads from areas under construction are significantly higher than loads from stabilized areas. The impacts of this sediment on the receiving waters include: deterioration of aquatic habitat, deterioration of aesthetic value, loss of reservoir storage capacity, and accumulation of bottom deposits that inhibit normal biological life. In addition, sediment is a primary carrier of other pollutants, including phosphorus. In order to understand the impact of sediment runoff from construction sites in the Upper Swift Creek Reservoir Watershed, modeling of two sites was conducted. Using this information it was determined that in a typical year the watershed could see the delivery of 720 to 3,400 tons of sediment inputs from unprotected construction sites. Erosion and sediment controls are predicted to reduce the annual load to between 230 and 1 ,350 tons per year. If the county can maintain effective erosion and sediment controls, then, in accordance with the predicted association with TSS delivery, approximately 460 to 2,780 pounds per year of phosphorus would reach the reservoir. The Management Plan and updated modeling indicate the required maximum limit in the range between 25,000 and 26,000 pounds of phosphorus per year at projected build out of the watershed. In terms of the annual phosphorus-loading goal, the phosphorus associated with construction sediment is approximately 2 to 11 percent of the annual goal for the reservoir. Without erosion and sediment controls, the range is 1 ,500 to 6,970 pounds per year, or approximately 6 to 27 percent of the annual goal (see Supporting Document H). · Erosion and sediment control practices can reduce TSS exported from construction sites by an order of magnitude. It follows that, to protect the Swift Creek Reservoir and its tributaries, particular attention should be paid to the implementation and enforcement of erosion and sediment controls. . To ensure the protection of water quality, when a project is near or adjacent to sensitive resource features or waterbodies, additional measures that exceed the state minimum standards should be required of development, to include VDOT road projects. 26 000229 . Monitoring of the watershed tributaries during storm flows would be used to assess the need for additional measures. F. Promote and encourage development standards for new development and redevelopment that minimize the environmental impact of improvements. Opportunities exist to promote and encourage new development and redevelopment methodologies using pollution prevention practices, source control measures and reduction of impervious areas. Currently these measures may be considered during the zoning process. With future development, the county should consider the development of ordinances that will consistently apply water quality treatment measures. . Low Impact Development (LID): LID employs a collection of techniques, which reduce pollutants and controls runoff by mimicking predevelopment site hydrology to store, infiltrate, evaporate and detain stormwater runoff. This control and reduction is achieved by minimizing impervious cover, conserving natural areas, and providing additional distributed stormwater management. The following are examples of LID: i. Biorentention practices are the development of shallow landscaped depressions that capture runoff and filter it through a prepared soil mix. ii. Stormwater infiltration practices capture and temporarily store runoff allowing it to infiltrate into the ground over a period of days. iii. Stormwater treatment practices are a series of structural and non-structural practices that compensate for hydrologic changes related to land development by reducing runoff volume and improving water quality. By controlling the quality, quantity and velocity of runoff, the health and supply of surface and ground water sources are better protected from the impacts of development caused pollution. . Development Site Design: Better site design minimizes land disturbance, preserves existing vegetation, and minimizes impervious cover through application of a series of development principles. Examples of these principles are outlined below: i. Minimization of clearing and grading reduces the area exposed to stormwater thereby reducing sediment discharge and the need for additional E&S measures. iL Reducing pollutants generated by encouraging designs and containment structures that allow for pollution prevention and spill contingency plans. iii. Remediation or interception of pollutants by employing, after development, site- specific treatments of areas that have greater pollution potential iv. Tree Save/Preservation/Planting is often not fully recognized for its stormwater benefits. Trees intercept and slow the fall of rainwater, helping the soil to absorb more water for gradual release into water resources. Increasing throughfall area 27 000230 prevents flooding, filters the water, releases water into the atmosphere, and reduces stress on the stormwater system. Based on these benefits developers should be encouraged to preserve a percentage of each lot or development to remain in a natural state. Additionally, these areas should allow for the green space habitat and wildlife corridors between neighborhoods and sub-watersheds. G. Promote citizen's group participation and education to aid in the protection of the Swift Creek Watershed. This goal recognizes the importance of the involvement of citizens to aid in the protection of water quality. Because citizen involvement is important to water quality, the county should encourage citizen groups and individual citizens to engage in activities that improve watershed awareness and active stewardship (Le. litter clean-up campaigns and buffer management). . Develop and distribute educational information and sponsor local watershed clean-up initiatives that would result in an overall improvement of the quality of the natural resources ~ith the Upper Swift Creek Region. H. Promote watershed awareness and stewardship of residents, community associations, businesses and visitors through education programs, recreational opportunities, and participatory watershed activities. Citizens and businesses privately own the majority of the watershed, including most of its natural resources. Effective private stewardship of the watershed is an integral part of its protection. It is intended to expand the current educational efforts, as required under the county's VSMP permit (Supporting Document I), within the Upper Swift Creek Watershed so as to encourage responsible environmental stewardship at the individual citizen level. As the watershed becomes more urbanized, water quality resources will come under new pressures. Currently, stormwater data from the Brandermill and Woodlake subdivisions indicate elevated levels of nutrient inputs during the Fall and Spring seasons that most likely a result of lawn care. As new residential developments are built, this trend is expected to continue. This data suggests citizens living in the watershed should be educated on nutrient pollution, to include education on the proper techniques for home and lawn care. In addition to educational efforts, the county also promotes active participation in watershed activities such as stream and lake monitoring, riparian buffer planting and stream clean-ups. Passive and active recreational activities, such as hiking and boating, are another way to raise watershed awareness through trails, nature centers and fishing tournaments. . Education and Outreach (on-going program): Publications and programs should be developed to specifically address the challenges and issues of the Upper Swift Creek Watershed, stressing the importance of protecting the Swift Creek Reservoir as a primary drinking water source. The citizens of this watershed should have a heightened awareness of the watershed in which they live and their personal effects on the water quality. This can be accomplished by working the various audiences. This could include: Working with the county schools to develop a special curriculum for schools in the use, develop a county-sponsored volunteer program specifically for watershed residents and to encourage homeowners associations to include water quality measures such as RPA-Buffer 28 000231. Management and yard maintenance language in their covenants especially for citizens on and around the lake. . Stormwater Management and Source Controls: For existing developments, identify areas where stormwater maintenance and retrofitting may be possible and necessary to maintain water quality. Develop a mechanism to make funding available to implement these retrofits. Successful retrofit projects will be limited by environmental factors, monetary concerns and public support Some of the retrofit strategies are outlined below and should also be considered in new development projects: a. Rain barrels and dry wells for citizens' homes and businesses b. Bioretention facilities, where soils permit c. Outfall controls (end of pipe treatments or facilities that divert smaller storms, provide energy dissipation, and/or treatment of stormwater) d. Retrofit culverts and drainage systems e. Retrofit and/or construct stormwater facilities f. Wetland and Stream Channel protection g. Manufactured BMPs (non-residential areas only) Financial Strategies: Develop an affordable and effective watershed management plan by devising strategies that build upon existing regulations, programs, and policies, take advantage of established monetary resources, and better target the management budget for more expensive land acquisitions and structural stormwater practices~ Increased coordination between agencies with jurisdiction in the watershed, such as VA Department of Transportation (VDOT), County of Powhatan, VA Department of Forestry, VA Department of Environmental Quality, the Army Corp, public utilities, and the county will be more effective in implementation of the watershed plan. 29 000232 Upper Swift Creek Plan land Use Categories (See accompanying land Use Plan Map) General Note: Suggested densities of development include all property suggested for such densities regardless of any development limitations that may exist or may be anticipated (such as planned roads or other public facilities, environmental or topographic features, areas suggested on the plan for conservation/recreation, etc~) General Note: Density of development for residential and non-residential zoning requests that include areas suggested on the plan for conservation/recreation should be calculated on the gross acreage for all property included in the request, including areas suggested for conservation/recreation, based on the recommended densities of the plan. General Note: The boundaries of conservation/recreation areas depicted on the plan are generalized. Residential (2.0 or less dwelling units per acre): Residences, places of worship, schools, parks and other similar public and semi-public facilities. Note 1 on land Use Plan map: Projects that drain away from Swift Creek Reservoir would be appropriate for densities of up to 2.2 dwelling units per acre. Office/Residential Mixed Use: Professional and administrative offices and residential developments of varying densities. Supporting retail and service uses would be appropriate when part of a mixed use center of aggregated acreage under a unified plan of development. (Equivalent zoning classifications: R (various), 0-2) Note 4 on the land Use Plan map: Regional mixed use may be appropriate in the northwest quadrant of the Route 288 /Hull Street Road interchange, based on existing, planned and/or proffered road improvements, as well as provision of adequate design standards to address land use transitions, design compatibility, visibility from area roads, etc. Deferred Growth: Primarily limited to agricultural and forestall uses, isolated single- family residences on large parcels, places of worship, and other similar semi-public facilities~ Other types of development, including public facilities such as public schools and parks, as well as the extension public water and wastewater services, should be deferred until the plan is amended through a subsequent review~ (Equivalent zoning classification: A) Community Mixed Use: Community scale commercial uses, including shopping centers, and service and office uses that serve community wide-trade areas. Residential uses of various types and densities may be appropriate if part of a larger mixed-use project and the design is integrated with other uses. (Equivalent zoning classification: C-3) Note 2 on the land Use Plan map: Community Mixed Use Node: Community scale commercial uses including, but not limited to, shopping centers, service and 30 000233 office uses' that serve community wide trade areas. Residential uses of various types and densities may be appropriate if part of a larger mixed use project and the design is integrated with other uses. The size and location of centers, and the mix of uses, should be determined in part by market area, availability of adequate access to the transportation system, and availability and suitability of land. In general, however, community-scale mixed use centers should be located at the intersections of major arterial roads. Intersections should be analyzed to determine which quadrant is best suited (through detailed analysis of land assembly, access or impact on residential uses) for a center, and the center should be located only on the superior site. Commercial uses should be located at one corner of the intersection and be surrounded by office and residential use transitions. (Equivalent zoning classification: C-3) General Business Mixed Use: General commercial uses including, but not limited to, automobile-oriented uses and light industrial uses. (Equivalent zoning classification: C-5) Note 6 on the Land Use Plan map: Properties not currently zoned for General Business Mixed Use should, at the time of zoning, be aggregated to sufficient acreage to ensure that development is oriented away from area roads~ Regional Mixed Use: Integrated office, regional commercial, higher density residential and light industrial park uses incorporated into a mixed use center of aggregated acreage under a unified plan of development. (Equivalent zoning classifications: C-4, 1-1) Note 3 on the Land Use Plan map: Outside storage might be appropriate in this area if such outside storage is oriented internal to a project and away from roads. Employment Center: Integrated corporate office, research and development, and light industrial uses on acreage of sufficient size to allow a unified plan of development. Moderate industrial uses may be appropriate when designed, located and/or oriented to ensure compatibility with less intense uses, and where appropriate access and transitions are provided. Retail and service uses that serve primarily surrounding employment center uses may be appropriate when part of a larger industrial and/or office development. The scale and mix of such retail and service uses should be proportionate to the needs of the primary employment center uses and should not be built until the employment center uses have developed to a density sufficient to support such retail and service uses, without such retail and service uses having to rely on larger markets for financial success. (Equivalent zoning classifications: 1-1, 1-2, 0-2) Convenience Commercial (not shown on Plan): Small scale uses, such as limited retail and personal services, when located within planned residential areas and designed to attract customers primarily from immediate. neighborhoods only. Typically, such uses should: be planned in conjunction with residential projects in order to insure compatibility; be limited in size and acreage; be located at the intersections of collector streets, or between residential neighborhoods and higher intensity uses and/or arterials; and provide transitions through consideration of appropriate uses, building scale, architecture and site design. Such areas require detailed analysis to ensure compatibility; therefore, individual locations cannot be depicted on the Land Use Plan map. (C-l) Public: Significant publicly owned properties (county, state and federal), including schools, parks, cemeteries and other public facilities, as well as publicly owned vacant 31 000234 land. Should such land be redeveloped for other uses, the appropriate uses would be those that are compatible with surrounding existing or anticipated development, as reflected by existing land uses, zoning, and/or the recommended land uses on the adopted comprehensive plan. Conservation/Recreation: Lands adjacent to water bodies with perennial flow that have an intrinsic water quality value due to the ecological and biological processes they perform or are sensitive to impacts which may cause significant degradation to the quality of state waters. Recommended land uses are those in conformance with the Chesapeake Bay Preservation Area, Upper Swift Creek Watershed, and other environmental provisions of the Chesterfield County Zoning Ordinance~ Where appropriate, some areas may be suitable for limited pedestrian and bicycle trails, or for other passive recreation activities. 32 000235 III . ~ i:: tI .. }. ~ ~ III ,,"1. IJ ~ .)I~ -: I.i III ~ it .J .~... :f ~ ...~ a ._~~~~~t ~: . ~~i~ ~"::I. ~~ ~ ~.w.~ ~ ~ .. ( I · - .;; ";r. ~. . ~ 1.1 . ~ :.~ ... .., __ -:-.. ~ :-:;::;." J~ ~ .. .. ~ ... ~ 1.1 II~. I ... ...... [~IIII:- I:.IIMI ::i. ~ ~. ~ :r ., '" ....~ ~:=-. ;_ I........... - ~ ~ ~. ~ .... ~. '. · ~ :. ~ I ~ ~J ~ ~L - _ ... _ ... ... . ..... · u. -, .. _ i....:.-... a; ;~.. ".I".!II -: .... II: In: :-.-:" ,.1r:" .... I-: ~ ~i :,;~. :.r~:. ~ ~~;;..." ",~~~~,W::;Ji~ tr-. ~ ~""~~'it~.:!.~::; ~:i~ F-II ~ ( ........- ~:"I ~ ~~ ~ ., .- ~ ~ .~: ... I ... ... II ~ iIi ~~ ~~ =:. IfI 1"1 · ~~ ~.I~ ] ~. ~ Ir:!~~~ ~ :-:. r... .~ .~.. -I.:. i I ~ 4: ~.~"--:-:... t- 11:.... or. ~ 'f r ~ ~ ("f") Q) b.O ~ O-i ~ C\S :c 000237 Supportin2 Document A (Revised & updated: 4/3/07) Upper Swift Creek Plan ADlendDlent Existing Conditions and Issues A. Plan Boundaries The boundaries of the Upper Swift Creek Area Plan are the Route 288 Corridor Plan to the north, the Southern and Western Area Plan and Central Area Plan to the south, Powhite/Route 288 Area Plan the to the east, and Powhatan County to the west A small portion of the adopted Upper Swift Creek Plan lies north of Midlothian Turnpike and east of Route 288, and is physically separated from the bulk of the Upper Swift Creek Plan by the Route 288 Corridor Plan. B. Maeisterial Districts The Upper Swift Creek Plan lies within the Matoaca Magisterial District (about 82 percent of the study area geography), within the Clover Hill Magisterial District (about 14 percent of the study area geography), and within the Midlothian Magisterial District (about 4 percent of the study area geography). C. Plan Status The study area of this plan amendment includes most of the geography of the current Upper Swift Creek Plan (adopted in 1991). That small portion of the 1991 plan physically separated from the study area by the Route 288 Corridor Plan is not included in the geography of this plan amendment, but will be included in the Robious Area Plan amendment currently lll1der review. The study area includes the majority of the Upper Swift Creek watershed within the jurisdiction of Chesterfield County. The geography of the plan amendment is approximately 57 square miles in area, comprising approximately 13 percent of the land area of the county. D. ExistiD!! ZOniD!! aDd Land Use Patterns Existing zoning and land use patterns within the study area reflect predominantly a mix of residential and agricultural zoning and uses. Most of the area's commercial zoning and uses are located along Rt. 360. Rt 360 provides a major east/west vehicular access, linking the study area with the rest of the county to the east and with Amelia County to the west. Route 288 provides a major north/south vehicular access, linking the study area with the rest of the county to the north and south as well as access to Powhatan and Henrico Counties to the north. Powhite Parkway provides additional major vehicular access to the northeast portions of Chesterfield County and to the City of Richmond. Planned improvements to Powhite 1 000238 Parkway will further enhance vehicular access between the study area and the surrounding region. As noted herein, the study area includes the majority of the Upper Swift Creek Watershed that lies within the jurisdiction of Chesterfield County. This watershed supplies Swift Creek Reservoir, currently a significant source of drinking water for the county and a major amenity for area residents. As of December 31, 2006, approximately 45 percent of the study area was zoned agriculturally, of which 60 percent had minimal improvements. Residential zoning accounted for approximately 47 percent of the land within the study area, of which 58 percent was minimally improved. Office, connnercial and industrial zoning accounted for about 8 percent of the area, of which 65 percent had yet to be developed. Residential zoning within the study area, as a percentage of overall zoning, is higher than the countywide average (47 percent for the study area compared to 35 percent countywide). The overall density for residential development is about the same as that for residential development in the county as a whole. The study area includes existing and planned residential neighborhoods of varying ages and char~cter, including: single family residences (including mobile homes) on acreage parcels; single family residences in subdivisions; townhouse subdivisions; and multi-family dwellings. An examination of land use data identified 16,186 dwelling units within the study area as of December 2006. The 2006 data also suggests that there was enough vacant land already zoned for residential use within the study area to permit the development of an additional 15,256 dwellings. Under the current adopted plan, 19,652 more dwellings could also potentially be built on agriculturally zoned vacant land recommended by the plan for residential development, for a potential adopted plan build-out total of about 51,094 dwellings (a 215 percent increase over the number of dwellings in 2006). Analysis of the proposed Upper Swift Creek Plan, projects a total of 43,434 dwellings by plan build-out, not including any subsequent development in the recommended deferred growth area. Significant public/semi public uses within the study area include: Homer Park; Clover Hill Library; Alberta Smith, Clover Hill, Spring Run, Swift Creek, and Woolridge Elementary Schools; Swift Creek Middle School; Clover Hill and Cosby High Schools; a temporary policing station; Clover Hill and Swift Creek Fire Stations; and Manchester Volunteer Station. Harpers Mill Elementary School is under constmction~ Semi-public uses include area churches, a private school (Millwood School), and golf courses. Swift Creek Reservoir provides a visual amenity to the public - however, access to the Reservoir for recreational purposes is restricted and generally not available to the public at large. 2 000239 E. DeHloe:raphic Information The following information comes from 2000 Census data and Chesterfield County's land use database for 2006 (through December 31,2006), together with additional information on population and housing gathered from county assessment records and studies. 1. Population A review of Chesterfield County's Land Use database for 2006 suggests that the number of people living in the study area increased between January 1, 1994 and December 31,2006, from approximately 27,900 to approximately 42,375, or an increase of about 52 percent. Estimates of countywide population growth for the same time period indicate that county population grew by about 35 percent. Most of this population growth has occurred in new subdivisions developing west of Wood lake and south of the Rt. 360 commercial corridor, as new households continue to move into the area. The study area population estimate represents approximately 14 percent of the county's estimated total population for 2006. Given that the study area includes approximately 13 percent of the area of the county, the population density of the study area is comparable to that for the county as a whole~ 2. Household Income The 2000 Census year estimated household income for census tracts that encompass the study area was approximately $71,682, or approximately 122 percent of the Chesterfield County average of$58,537 for the 2000 Census year. 3. Housing The study area has a mix of older and newer neighborhoods and a mix of housing types. The average assessment of single-family residences in 2006 was $264,295, compared to a county average of $227,347. The average age of residences was estimated to be about 16 years, compared to a county average of24 years. 4. Residential Development Patte111s Residential development within the study area is characterized primarily by single-family residences on acreage parcels, by single-family and townhouse residences in subdivisions, and by apartments and condominiums in multi-family complexes. The following generally summarizes residential development within the study area: . Single- family residences on acreage parcels front most of the arterial roads in the western and southern fringes of the study area. 000240 3 . Single-family and townhouse residences in subdivisions include a mix of older and newer neighborhoods, with most new single-family subdivisions developing west of Woodlake and south of the Rt. 360 commercial conidor. . Several multi-family complexes are within the study area. These are primarily located along, or in proximity to Rt. 360, and within, and north ot: Brandermill and W oodlake. F. Commercial Development Pattern Commercial uses within the study area consist primarily of businesses on parcels fronting Rt. 360, with a significant node of commercial, office and industrial development in the vicinity of the Gentio Road/Old Hundred Road intersection. G. EInPlovment and Jobs In the second quarter of 2003, approximately 19,448 employed persons resided in the study area. During the same period area businesses generated approximately 7,182 jobs. These estimates suggest the study area is a net exporter of workers, by a ratio of about 2.7 workers living in the area per job within the area. H. Tax Revenue It is difficult to obtain information about tax revenue generated for specific geographies of the county~ However, a review of county assessment data for land and improvements (December 31, 2006) suggests that the study area is a net generator of real estate tax revenue. Specifically, county assessment records indicate that land and improvements within the study area account for approximately 16 percent of total assessed taxable value countywide. As noted herein, the population of the study area is approximately 13 percent of countywide population estimates. These estimates suggest that the study area generates slightly more per-capita real estate tax revenue than that generated countywide. A further analysis of real estate assessment records suggests that approximately 10 percent of the county's assessed value for all office, commercial and industrial improvements (exclusive of land value) are located in the study area. This might suggest that 10 percent of the office, commercial and industrial development of the county is located in the study area, which, as noted herein, includes 13 percent of the county's land area and 14 percent of the county's population. I. EnviroDDlental Features As noted herein, the study area includes most of the Upper Swift Creek Watershed and Swift Creek Reservoir. The Swift Creek Reservoir is approximately 1700 acres in surface area and serves as a source of water for Chesterfield County citizens. The reservoir also supports fish and other aquatic life. In addition to the reservoir, there are tributary streams and adjacent wetlands in the study area. There are also non-tidal 4 000241 wetlands throughout the study area that are not associated with any of the streams or the reservoIr. The complex of streams and wetlands in the watershed provide wildlife habitat, support aquatic life, serve as a recreational resource and add to the aesthetics of the study area. The tributary streams also have floodplains and Resource Protection Areas (RP As) adjacent to them (approximately 14 percent of the study area). The floodplains and RPAs protect the streams by filtering out pollutants in stormwater runoff. These areas are identified in the Water Quality Protection Plan as environmentally sensitive features, and land uses and activities within them are limited by county ordinance. Additional environmentally sensitive areas may exist in the study area; however, these areas have not yet been calculated~ Further analysis of these features would occur with new development. The study area is generally characterized by flat to gently rolling topography typical of the Piedmont and Triassic physiographic regions. Soils in the area can be characterized as moderately to well drained. There are some areas, however, that have clayey or hydric soils, which do not drain well. Significant slopes and erodible soil conditions exist along some stream banks. J. Utilities Public Water and Wastewater Service The area encompassed by the Upper Swift Creek Plan amendment is supported by public water and wastewater infrastructure that has been planned to accommodate future growth while maintaining quality service for existing residential, commercial and industrial areas. Water System The County's public water system is an interconnected system which draws treated water from three sources: the Swift Creek Reservoir, the City of Richmond, and the Appomattox River Water Authority (ARWA) at Lake Chesdin. While the amount of water taken from Swift Creek Reservoir is anticipated to remain at a constant rate, existing long-term contracts with the City of Richmond and the ARW A insure that sufficient water will be available to meet the domestic and fire protection demands of future as well as existing development in the Upper Swift Creek watershed. The existing water system consists of transmission and distribution lines, booster pump stations and elevated storage tanks. The County's Water and Wastewater Facilities Plan reflects that development in the upper portion of the Upper Swift Creek Plan amendment area will be served by water line extensions from an existing 24" line along Rt. 60, and by the existing Huguenot Springs and Midlothian tanks. Water lines will need to be constructed along Old Hundred Road, Otterdale Road north of Genito Road, and Mt. Hermon Road. Development in the central 000242 5 and lower portion of the Plan area will be served by extensions from existing 24" lines along Rt 360 and Spring Run Road, by existing 16" lines along Winterpock Road, Genito Road and Woolridge Road, and by the existing Clover Hill and Physic Hill tanks. Water lines will need to be constructed along Rt. 360 west of Hampton Park Boulevard, DuVal Road, and Genito Road west of Otterdale Road. It is anticipated that those lines will be constructed by private developers. The County's Water and Wastewater Facilities Plan reflects a future water tank west of Otterdale Road, between DuVal Road and Genito Road, and on Rt 360 in the vicinity of Grange Hall elementary school. The Water and Wastewater Facilities Plan also reflects future construction of the "Southwest Corridor Transmission Line", which will begin at the ARW A treatment plant at Lake Chesdin, follow River Road to Riverway Road, run along RivelWay Road to Beach Road, run east along Beach Road to the future Otterdale Road Extended, run along Otterdale Road Extended through the Southern Land Sales tract, and connect to a future water line along Rt 360, west of Winterpock Road. This transmission line, along with two new pump stations and a ground storage tank, will move water from the ARW A facility into the western Rt. 360 corridor, will feed the future "Grange Hall" tank, and will support existing development as well as future growth reflected by the Upper Swift Creek Plan. Wastewater System The "backbone" of the public wastewater system that serves the Upper Swift Creek Plan area is the Upper Swift Creek Transport System, which was completed in 1990. This facility includes a 60" diameter trunk along Genito Road at the upper end of Swift Creek Reservoir, the Upper Swift Creek Wastewater Pump Station located north of Genito Road at the mouth of Little Tomahawk Creek, and dual force mains which convey wastewater east to the Bailey's Bridge Road Wastewater Pump Station. At the present time a single force main conveys wastewater from that location east to the Proctors Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant. The County's Water and Wastewater Facilities Plan includes future expansion of the Upper Swift Creek pump station, replacement of the Bailey's Bridge Road pump station with a much larger facility, and construction of two additional force mains to convey wastewater to the treatment plant. Construction of the new Bailey's Bridge Road pump station and the additional force mains began in early 2004 and completion is projected for late 2005. These system upgrades will insure that adequate capacity will be available in the downstream facilities to support future growth reflected by the Upper Swift Creek Plan. The Water and Wastewater Facilities Plan reflects future large wastewater lines that will be necessary along Swift Creek, Tomahawk Creek, Otterdale Creek, Horsepen Creek, and Blackman Creek. Extensions of existing wastewater lines along West Branch Creek, Spring Run Creek, Dry Creek, and Fuqua Branch Creek will also be needed. It is anticipated that those lines will be constructed by private developers. The Upper Swift Creek Transport System was designed and constructed to support future development in the Upper Swift Creek watershed based on the higher land use densities 6 000243 as reflected in the Powhite/Route 288 Development Area Plan, which predates the Upper Swift Creek Plan. With adoption of the Upper Swift Creek Plan in 1991, and the subsequent plan amendment in 2000, significantly lower residential development densities were recommended, which have been consistently followed for developments approved by the County over the past thirteen years. These lower densities have made available a limited amount of system capacity within the Upper Swift Creek Transport System, which is not anticipated to be utilized by development within the Upper Swift Creek watershed. Future extensions of wastewater lines needed for development of the Magnolia Green site will be oversized to include that additional capacity. Future lines constructed within Magnolia Green, along Blackman Creek and its tributaries, will also be oversized to include the additional capacity, and will provide access points for a very limited area along the south side of Rt. 360, at the southeast and southwest quadrants of the future Powhite Parkway interchange. This area is in the upper end of the Appomattox River watershed. Development in this limited area would require the construction of one or two strategically placed pump stations, with force mains extending across Rt. 360, in order to access the public wastewater system and utilize that additional system capacity. Creation of Water and Wastewater Assessment Districts The County does not have funds appropriated for the extension of public water and wastewater service into areas of existing development Since 1989 the County's policy to address requests for service has been to pursue the creation of "assessment districts". If the majority of property owners in a specific area desire public water and/or wastewater service the Board of Supervisors may hold a public hearing, and consider the creation of an assessment district. If approved, the Board will appropriate the funds for that specific project and all owners, whose property abut the utility line, will be assessed a share of the total project costs as a means of reimbursing the County. The assessment will be recorded as a lien on the property, and the owners can pay the assessment in one lump sum payment, or choose bi-annual payments for up to a 20-year period. Property owners aged 65 years or older who occupy a dwelling on their property may request that their assessment payments be deferred until such time as the dwelling is no longer occupied by an owner aged 65 or older, or is sold or otherwise conveyed to another person. At that time the suspension of payments would cease, and the entire assessment, plus any accrued interest would be due. K. Police Service There is a temporary police precinct serving the area. It is anticipated that this facility will become permanent by 2007 - 2008. The need for additional police service facilities is addressed in the Public Facilities Plan, which was updated in 2004. L. Fire Service There are two fire stations and one volunteer station within the study area. The need for additional frre service facilities is addressed in the Public Facilities Plan, which was updated in 2004. 7 000244 M. Schools The study area lies within the Alberta Smith, Clover Hill, Evergreen, Grange Hall, Spring Run, Swift Creek, Watkins and Woolridge Elementary School zones, the Bailey Bridge, Midlothian and Swift Creek Middle School Zones, and the Clover Hill, Manchester and Midlothian High School zones. Cosby High School opened in 2006 - 2007a Harpers Mill Elementary School is scheduled to open in 2007 - 2008. The need for additional school facilities is addressed in the Public Facilities Plan, which was updated in 2004a N. Libraries The study area is served by the Clover Hill and Midlothian Libraries. The need for additional library facilities is addressed in the Public Facilities Plan, which was updated in 2004. o. Parks and Recreation Homer Park and the Clover Hill Athletic Facility are located within the study area. The need for additional park facilities is addressed in the Parks and Recreation Master Plan and Public Facility Plan, which was updated in 2004. 8 000245 Continued development in the western portions of the county is putting pressure on the existing road network to accommodate increased traffic from new residents and businesses moving into the area~ The following Tables list the most recent Average Daily Traffic (ADT) volumes on Primary and major Secondary roads in the Plan area: PRIMARY ROUTES. TRAFFIC VOLUME HISTORY Upper Swift Creek Plan Area Updated: May 2005 35,898 9 000246 Secondary Road Traffic Volumes Upper Swtft Creek Plan Area Updated: August 2005 ~r~@j%1P~rmr{~i@mi~@~' y, ,. " Mt: .:~~~~~rt~:~:::~:~tiiiiiiiiiiWiiimii1iii:i1i1ii ::::{W$.ik:::: ii:i:Ji~t.:~:~:~: .:~:~:~:~na~:~:~:~ ~W:l[~1i: ~:~:~:I&If.j>i:i:; t>:inD~ti:i:iii .:"'"'~;I::ji~: ..l~=~~~ :::~ -! 11.~46 ~:~~ : 8,~8 .. ~)i)i);jijjji;ji@;" ftami:~~JbWij ..... .... 1 217 . 1,000 1,300 - )j)fjiij@jjj .;:... _~a~~LBijMt .: : 553 510 985 - - I ~3?;~11~1:'~:4 21.~72 19,000 2;i~0 ~ 2~8 iUi! w~..~.~.~!.eSw.Wi~ - 13,376 - - - .i@ijimu@ijij ija~nm::~tW:..~ttiKfflm1~ll:":::::'::::: 14,481 - - - - - j)j@.j@jj) ~~~:e~*tjiw: .' 10,838 - 11,227 l 13,603 1 - - t . i@i1imm@i@ 1'.el~.~~~:.~~li~t~1@11~1}I:1):l1ti 3,759 - - 5.372 4,937 I ==11 ::~::=:=~ ~:~~: : :; ~:::~ : 2,9~7 I :~ ~ !~; ~! ~ ~ i 4%1#1%%.1: :~r ~-::.:::: tf~~;::::::::::::::::::::::~t:::::::::;~~~~::::::::::::::::::::::itmj)1)1)1)I1Ii:)1iI1 3,718 - - 3,976: - . I X~~t\tK\\%\SY tt~ .:.'~-: T x~:::::::~::::~:::::::r:::::::j::if::::::::::::\~::::::::::::::::::::::;iUiWi1i1i:i1i:.. - - - 950 - ~ * #b....4lXtS\:b mr""~v x::::::::~:::'::':::::)r::::::::::'::)iI&~f.iW1.)1i1i1iWi1i1i1i:i:i: 466 - I 470 440 - t ~ :-')\\Th%R S ~. 4@ x::::::::~::~:::::f:::::::::::'::)::f::::::::::::::::::::::;1)iiffiniiii)1)1i1i1i])1i1i1)1ir - - - 240 . . .'.:.'::::::::m ,,:,,:::::~::x ~ * :::::::::::::~::xijMiitei1IHii~1)1i111i1i11ji11j11i:i1i1i1i1: 182 - - - - 207 ':::"'::::::~::::~'~::"~":m~x _4lli ~x .::::::.'::::.'::.ffiijimftim@ii~111i1111ji:i1iji1i1i1i1i1i1i:i1i ~ - ~ 420 - - ..;:.:...:...~:.':...m~::::"~:. .w. P' x . 0 . .:~;::.~~~~~~~miIo#IIiM/?i111i:i1i1i1i1i:i:i1i:imi:m:i 4,662 - 5,802 5,831 - - "'M"'"'"'''iili'ltillii%f lII"fUliR$W 5,659 - 6,301 7,067 - - .....:.:.:..: . ':~::w/..~~<~.~:~.. X' .::::~:::~:::::.'.$W~m~r::::.5ht<<r::::..:.:.:::...: ...::::::i1~~~::::::::~::::i:m _ - 15,605 _ _ .....~..:.:.~:.:.~ ......w. ,~:.x w///..w..; "~f(tw?~ [@" . :~:.::::::..':'::.~~;im~r.:....tmmttpitti~~i111i:i111imm:i:i:i 8,391 - 11, 135 ~ - - .....:.:.:.....:..<- ............ ':::::Y"::-'~~~@?g:@' w/;Y////. 0 w":::...:.:::~~...:.:::::::~~~~:~.'.:::::.:.~..:~~iml~gGitdi1iii1i:i:i:i 13,859 . _ _ _ _ I =:.=rrrrrlrrrlrrrlrrlrl~ rrr=:r;~~~==::: 1;~6 - 1,1~ ~:~~~ 8~8 1,1~O =:'==I::==::~III.H U : - 1,100 ~:~:: 9;6 :! ':::_IOO~J.iiaWi1@@jjj1ijj);jijjjijj1jjjjjWj jjj;j;1~ijjijijjj WQtriM1tjififfifMin::~l !m::.: ~ - 1,885 1 ,855 2,853 - :"':::::::::~::::~:::::::ir::'::::::ii;i_jjjji;j@jj;ji1i1ij;jijjj~jij;ji 1ijjj;1jiiijjjjj@ m~jr~:.Rdi~f&j~~.~~::'::":':":", ~ . - 6,495 - - :::::::.::::m::ul 8,~2 7,942 : 9,~6 10,~43 :~::~~; There are several roads in the plan area that have no shoulders, and that currently carry 4,000 or more vehicles per day. To accommodate this existing volume of traffic, these roads should be improved to 24 feet of pavement, with an eight foot paved shoulder, with vertical and horizontal alignments improved as necessary. The following Table lists Levels of Service on roads in the Plan area, calculated using the most recent available data. Level of Service "E" represents roads that are currently at capacity. Level of Service "F" represents roads carrying traffic volulnes that exceed the ideal capacity of the road (also see the attached map). 000247 10 Upper Swift Creek Plan Primary and Secondary Road Levels of Service Updated: September 2005 'k1MWi!%iii I111~itlilf~__.i......................... ... ......111 1.lllrlll~~~~=: I :..~\x:'.unt .m~.m~ ~;r~:~~~::.::~:~:::::::::q~:fi~~mlufj1~iiR1;;i;e~iIj~];j~.:..<:j]. 2 101819 E .~~~.~ '-ll~~ :@.N~~ ~1~I~i~:M::~:Plf~i~f~If?~i:iji1Iili~~:fj~i:~i~ribMIIWli/~;:'l~lk 2 8.688 E .~~*~.~=1t\T it.1 ;~!~i~i~t:::~::~:~;:~::~:!;~~Ij~!~~_tiijij~~~"IljjiIllu~~;1:~~~~~~~. 2 3,453 D ~~~~~ ~~~~\%~::~t: tLDtt' !i!1i~~B~~!.tiI_~!~iil~:i:~]~i:ij:m$~~i_~~~i~~1i~~~!~~~~~;~i~!~~~~~1~1mlill 2 911 B :~ :.~ .~~t\litKt~mfu\: ~W~iii1R I{Rti.~~~_~jaljIll._j~~lilt:~~~:~:;;~fl&~: 2 5,460 D !m~~:::~:~:::~:::~:::~~;::~~~:~:~:::~::::W'J#?_f* @ ~J0 :~:~'~'!NF';':::':::::'::'::'~':::::':~::::\11Id11.I~t~i:::~:::;t:m~::~::~::~::::~?~:~~:::::~:::.:::.:::1~11j:~.~;1i1i11111!111!111!1! 2 1,300 B 11!1!111_mW:~I:~i:~~;f.JtrJ%~ ~ .:::~c:if.:lmi.'rffli~_~~~al~]1;.1I11_1:~:;.~:j:j:1111111111111111 2 985 B ~~!~i~i:t;::::~:::~~:::~:~:::::~::~:~:~:~:~:~::::::::::~?~~rj* ~iw2%? );~~W$~' :~::::~_iM:ji.~~~illiIlll1~i~:::::::i:;~;:i:::::i:::::::~:m;:~j;:~;;j~f~;.;:;:~.~;~.1111111111111111 2 7,970 E i[6~!~:::::::= JfI'J:;"::=~:=il : ~~::~~ I ~ 11~111~1B~1~.lltl~0f(g fxrGtm (:'iouiifIRjriti6ri::_ji~~jjjm;im.~]~N~;~...::111111111;1~111~ 2 228 A 11111111_~m.:;m.~;i;@:jjjjjj~;j:~ ;jjji~ii1j:;:~:~;;:; Hal~r.o ROOd & Moomthiar:fWbKe 2 635 B lEE IIi. =~==:~:::~:::R_ : ~:::;: : _111"_<. SiitffiJQrtfiiIEP!WiWI'.mJ eRuad 2 13.603 F ==I; !!=~a:~~~=6~ ~ :::~ ~ 111111111~111.1:~;~~~;~j~ji]ijr;~;;~;~~~:~;~;~;j;i;~1~:~!~~~;; ;1!~~~!~;~m;~;;:~~~~~ WiWUJ!iimim Rda(U& _. 1i~d 2 4,483 D =II;; ::!~:~:ij~~:~:::U=: ~ 1~::9 ~ jjr:l~;:;;!'~;l~ii;i~~ ii:;ii i;~;;=;;i~;;i:~;;..rr{f ~ ~: ;~: ~ m ?~~~\W~~~~Mt$tt ~[t.~{ ~iii~I&.IalJ~!i.~!Wlm{~.ijti~~~illi~ijij{j:)t:::. 2 i 440 B ?:~:j~*:~~~~\l~~mM RBUi :~;~:1;~.8III.~!~ijIAI.61~!.~i1RIi~~ji~iijrjjij1'? 2 j 220 B I :~~it.l\Th~ ~1~.itI ~~~i~;~a_1Mili~;aimt~:~&i~..;~~;ialf'~i1ji:~';:1~t~;i. 2 207 A ~\_11tIt mBI@ ~;~j.j~~Haii~~iil1W~~;ijoo~JIIEw:~~jjlirr/\:::. 2 5,831 E i*~~~'x:~:~~~~~~::@::@.mL ::~=T ::'::;~~~~_~~.rgija_i!:':::';~::::~:::::::::;:;:;:~.\~\;:Af&~ 2 7,067 E I:;:;::: :=;::~::.=~:. ................. ~ ~~::~: : :X' :::: :::: m m 11 000248 Traffic Accident Statistics.. Reported Crashes 2002,2003, and 2004 { Accident statistics provided by the Ch-asterfield County Police Department) 283 327 310 920 36.8% 153 173 205 531 21.2% 145 165 171 481 192% 42 50 sa 148 5.9% 30 31 26 87 3.5% 3 27 8 38 1.5% 3 4 2 9 0.4% 42 50 36 128 5.1% 38 71 158 6.3% 11111:::::]]]J1]:j]11111111111.111111111111111111111111111111 m..::j:j:: The Upper Swift Creek Plan area includes one of the most highly congested road corridors in the County. Drivers on Hull Street Road (State Route 360) between W oodlake Village Parkway and Swift Creek experience extensive travel delays during several hours of the day, and especially during the morning and afternoon rush hours. Virginia's Surface Transportation Assistance Act (STAA) Truck Routing Map designates Hull Street Road, Route 288, and Powhite Parkway as "Non-Interstate Qualifying Highways". This designation allows oversize vehicles and tandem trailers to use these roadways. Hull Street Road is a major regional east/west truck route. Recent traffic data provided by VDOT indicates that trucks make up approximately 8 percent of the daily traffic volume on Hull Street Road. The Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) Six-Year Improvement Program includes a project to widen Route 360 to six (6) and eight (8) lanes from Winterpock Road to Swift Creek. Widening of the westbound lanes was scheduled to begin in 2005; however, after tvlo advertisements, bids received were too high. Staff hopes the project will be under construction next year. Additional funding for the second phase, widening of the eastbound lanes, is identified in the FY08 and FY 09 years of the current Program~ This second phase is included in the recent county bond referendum. 1~he county hopes to accelerate the project and have it under construction by Spring 2006. Additional projects in the Plan area include: 13 000250 1. A project to reconstruct two substandard curves on Spring Run Road between McEnnal1y Road and Bailey Bridge Roada Construction is scheduled to begin in Fall 2007. 2. A project to improve two substandard curves on Bailey Bridge Road. The county is managing these projects. Construction is anticipated to begin in Summer 2006a 3. A project to reconstruct Bailey Bridge Road as a two-lane road from Claypoint Road to Manchester High School. The project is not anticipated to begin until Spring 2010. 4. A project to make spot safety improvements on Woolridge Road south of Crown Point. The county was successful in obtaining federal safety funds for this locationa Construction is expected to begin in 2008. 5. A project to add a fourth westbound lane on Hull Street Road from Route 288 to Old Hundred Road/Commonwealth Center Parkway. Construction is planned for Spring 2006. The section of Woolridge Road that crosses the Swift Creek Reservoir is not currently in the State Highway System. This is one of a relatively few major Secondary roads in Chesterfield County that are not maintained by VDOT. Maintenance of this short section of roadway is the responsibility of Chesterfield County. VDOT assigns a "Sufficiency Rating" to major culvert and bridge structures based on several factors, including structural adequacy, functional obsolescence, and essentiality for public use. If the Sufficiency Rating for a culvert or bridge is less than 80, but more than 50, the structure is eligible for rehabilitation funding. A structure rated less than 50 qualifies for rehabilitation or complete replacement. Based on information provided by VDOT, four structures in the plan area are rated between 50 and 80: 1. Wo,odlake Vil1a€!e Parkway (70.0) - over West Branch Creek, north of Village Square Parkway 2. Old Hundred Road (65.0) - over Nuttree Branch, between Brandermill Parkway and Millridge Parkway 3. Otterdale Road (52.1) - over Otterdale Branch, just south of Genito Road 4. Mount Hermon Road (50.7) - over Swift Creek, just south of County Line Road Two are rated at less than 50: 1. Genito Road (41.6) - easternmost structure over Swift Creek Reservoir 2a Genito Road (29.3) - westernmost structure over Swift Creek Reservoir 14 000251, In addition, there are several bridges within the plan area that have vehicle weight limits, which restricts their use by heavy truck traffic. There are two at-grade railroad crossings in the plan area. One crosses County Line Road north of Mount Hermon Road, and one crosses at the intersection of Mount Hermon Road and: Hallsboro Road. Railroad crossing gates were recently installed at these crossIngs. The County's Bikeway Plan was adopted by the Board of Supervisors in 1989. The purpose of the Bikeway Plan is "to designate a coordinated system of bike facilities to connect County and State parks with other high bike traffic generators such as schools." The Bikeway Plan is not intended to designate roads that are appropriate for bicycle travel, but to identify routes where bikeway facilities should be provided in conjunction with future road improvement projects. Several roads in the Upper Swift Creek Plan area are included on the Bikeway Plan. Bike facilities were included in the widening of Genito Road, from Route 360 to Fox Chase Lane, and in the intersection project at Genito Road and Woolridge Road. Through truck traffic is prohibited from using Old Hundred Road to travel between Midlothian Turnpike and Genito Road, and between Genito Road and Hull Street Road. In order to violate these prohibitions, trucks must travel the entire length of the restricted route without stopping for business purposes. Trucks that have business along these routes are authorized to use the roads. 000252 15 Blank page 000253 16 Supportine DOCUDlent B (Revised & updated: 4/3/07) UDPer Swift Creek Plan ADlendment Land Use Analysis - Residential, Office, Commercial and Industrial A. Purpose of Analvsis This analysis attempts to anticipate the need for residential, office, commercial and industrial land within the study area based on potential market demand and community- wide, land use planning practices. Specifically, real estate professionals often analyze potential uses for property based on the principle of "highest and best use", a term often defined as 'the legal use of a parcel of land which, when capitalized, will generate the greatest net present value of income'. Implied in the term is the notion that markets forces (supply, demand, competition, etc.) can best determine how land should be used. However, "highest and best use" is only one principle applicable to a land use analysis. Another, equally important principle is "most appropriate use" which, borrowing from the Code of Virginia, might be defined as 'a coordinated, adjusted and harmonious development of lands within a jurisdiction which will, in accordance with present and probable future needs and resources, best promote the health, safety, morals, order, convenience, prosperity and general welfare of that jurisdiction's citizens' . Consideration of both principles is appropriate in a land use plan analysis. This analysis makes no attempt to determine the current or short-term marketability of anyone parcel for anyone use. Rather, it attempts to anticipate future needs for broad categories of uses throughout the study area over time~ In addition, this analysis does not attempt to suggest the specific relationships of these uses to one another within the study area, or within the wider community. These relationships are best determined by means of a Comprehensive Plan amendment. Private market forces (availability and price of land, location, character and age of competing businesses, site specific characteristics such as topography and visibility from roads, etc.) would decide the desirability of a specific use on one parcel over another, as well as the timing for developing such use, based on the principle of 'highest and best use'. The zoning process would determine the appropriateness of such use on a case-by-case basis by applying the guidelines for desirable land use development patterns as outlined in the plan. Demand for additional, or differently located, land in any zoning classification or land use category is influenced by many factors, some of which are hard to quantify or predict. In addition, limitations on the types and quality of readily available data, together with differing opinions on the significance of this data and how best to analyze, interpret and use it, further complicate the task of predicting future land use needs. For these reasons, 17 000254 this analysis must be viewed as one of many tools used to craft a land use plan amendment for the Upper Swift Creek Plan study area~ B. Study Area Boundaries and Existing Conditions The boundaries of the Upper Swift Creek Area Plan includes the Route 288 Corridor Plan to the north, the Southern and Western Area Plan and Central Area Plan to the south, Powhite/Route 288 Area Plan the to the east, and Powhatan County to the west. A small portion of the adopted Upper Swift Creek Plan lies north ofMidlothian Turnpike and east of Route 288, and is physically separated from the bulk of the Upper Swift Creek Plan by the Route 288 Corridor Plan. The Plan geography is approximately 57 square miles in area, comprising approximately 13 percent of the land area of the county. The study area of this Plan amendment includes most of the geography of the currently adopted Upper Swift Creek (adopted in 1991). That small portion of the 1991 Plan physically separated from the study area by the Route 288 Corridor Plan is not included in the geography of this Plan amendment, but will be included in the Robious Area Plan amendment currently under review a The study area includes the majority of the Upper Swift Creek watershed within the jurisdiction of Chesterfield County ~ Existing zoning and land use patterns within the study area reflect a mix of residential and agricultural zoning and uses, with commercial zoning and uses along Rt. 360. Rt. 360 provides a major east/west vehicular access, linking the study area with the rest of the county to the east and with Amelia County to the west. Route 288 provides a major north/south ve,hicular access, linking the study area with the rest of the county to the north and south, and also provides major vehicular access to Powhatan and Henrico Counties to the north. Powhite Parkway provides additional major vehicular access to the northeast portions of Chesterfield County and to the City of Richmond. Planned improvements to Powhite Parkway will further enhance vehicular access between the study area and the surrounding region~ C. Zoning Activity within the Study Area: Analysis of past zoning activity is one way to anticipate future demand for residential, office, commercial, and industrial zoning and land uses within the study area~ Specifically, land is typically rezoned with an expectation, on the part of the owner/developer, that it can be developed in the future for uses within the new zoning category. The following table summarizes zoning activity within the study area between Januaryl, 1993 and April 1, 2007: Acrea e 3,970 acres 1 7 acres 157 acres 23 acres 18 000255 28 acres Zoning activity within the study area since 1993 has significantly increased the inventory of residentially zoned land, followed by slight increases in commercial and office zoned land. The following table summarizes net zoning gains/losses within the study area between January 1, 1993, and April 1, 2007: Industrial - 35 acres CommerciaVoffice + 216 acres Residential + 3,964 acres Agricultural - 4,155 acres Data compiled from Chesterfield County Planning Department zoning database from January 1, 1993 through Aprill, 2007 The following table summarizes the breakdown of zoning acreage and land usage within the study area as of December 31, 2006: Upper Swift Creek Plan - Zoning and Development %of Developed Minimal % Minimal county- (as improvements improvements wide ofl2/31/06) * * by zonmg cate 0 Agricultural 16,400 45 11 6,458 9,605 60 Residential 17,233 47 6,848 9,337 58 Office & 2,108 6 661 1,026 61 Commercial Industrial 716 2 151 501 77 Data for zoning compiled from Chesterfield County GIS data for 3/16/07 Note: This data is a reflection of base zoning only and does not factor uses that may be permitted through CUPD (such as commercial uses on residentially zoned property, etc.) Data for development compiled from the Chesterfield County Planning Department land use database for 2006 (12/31/06) Acreages do not include land in rights of way. 19 000256 *Recorded as tvacanf or lwater' in DPD06 land use database. Zoning - Countywide (3/16/07) County.. Zoning A ole R Zoning Zoning - Upper Swift Creek Plan amendment geography (3/16/07) use Plan amendment.. Zoning A ole R Zoning Zonins; activity - - Conclusions: Based on zoning activity over time, the demand for residentially zoned land is strong, followed by the demand for commercially zoned land. Current zoning activity, as judged by zoning cases within the Plan geography currently 20 000257 pending before the Planning Commission and the Board of Supervisors, suggests that the demand for residentially zoned land will continue to remain strong in coming years. E. Residential Development Activity within the Study Area: Another way to anticipate future demand for residential, office, commercial, and industrial zoning and land uses is to examine development activity in recent years. The influx of new families into the area and the development of new housing units in subdivisions and apartment complexes suggest a demand for residential land uses. Site plan approvals for offices, businesses, and manufacturing facilities suggest a demand for office, commercial and industrial land uses. Projecting population growth in and around the study area can also suggest future demand for housing, jobs, services and retail trade. The following table estimates population growth rates between January 1, 1994 and December 31, 2006 for the study area and the county as a whole: Chesterfield Coun Po ulation Growth, Janua 1, 1994 to December 31,2006 Area 1994 2006 % Increase Stud Area 27,900 42,375 52 Coun ide 226,900 305,886 35 Data for population compiled from estimates in the Chesterfield COlUlty Planning Department land use database for 2006 (12/31/06). Residential development within the study area is characterized primarily by single-family residences on acreage parcels, by single family and townhouse residences in subdivisions, and by apartments and condominiums in multi-family complexes. 1. Sio21e Familv A review of Chesterfield GIS data from January 1, 1994 through December 31, 2006 reveals an increase of 5,486 single-family residences (on acreage parcels and in single- family subdivisions) within the study area during this time period, from 8,192 residences to 13,678 residences, or an increase of about 67 percent. A similar review for the entire county during this time period for single-family residences reveals a countywide increase of about 37 percent. According to the Residential Report, as of December 31, 2005, the study area had an inventory of about 4,749 undeveloped lots in recorded and tentatively approved subdivisions (approximately 27 percent of all lots within the study area). For the same year, the county as a whole had an inventory of 19,719 such lots (approximately 19 percent of all lots within the county). 2. Multi-familv~ Condominium~ and townhouse 21 000258 A review of Chesterfield GIS data from January 1994 through December 2006 reveals an increase of 1,033 multifamily, condominium, and townhouse residences within the study area during this time period, from 1,475 residences to 2,508 residences, or an increase of about 70 percent. A similar review for the entire county during this time period for multifamily, condominium and townhouse residences reveals a countywide increase of 51 percent. According to the Residential Report, as of December 31, 2005, the study area had 269 undeveloped units in multi-family, condominium and townhouse developments (about 11 percent of all such units within the study area). For the same year, the county as a whole had an inventory of 3,046 undeveloped units (approximately 14 percent of all possible multi-family, condominium and townhouse units within the county). F. Office~ Commercial and Industrial DeveloPlDent Activity within the Study Area: 1. Office Development In recent decades, major office zoning and development activity (office park use) has occurred in the northern portions of the county, along Midlothian Turnpike and the Powhite Parkway corridor. In addition, many properties zoned for such use a decade or more ago have yet to begin developing. However, with the recent completion of improvements to Rt. 288, it is anticipated that such development will occur within, and in proximity to, the northern portions of the study area, in the vicinity of the Powhite Parkway/Rt. 288 interchange. As Powhite Parkway is extended to Rt. 360, additional office-type development should ,occur in proximity to this intersection. 2. Commercial Develooment Commercial development patterns in the study area are primarily characterized by commercial zoning and uses along the Rt. 360 corridor. Some of this existing commercial development consists of small businesses on parcels having depths of 200 to 300 feet. An exception to this pattern is the Genito Road/Old Hundred Road intersection, which has developed as a significant node of commercial and office uses. a. Commercial - - Shopping Centers The study ~ea includes several convenience scale, neighborhood scale, and community scale shopping centers and one power center. In addition, there are several planned community scale shopping centers currently under review or anticipated for review in the near future. These shopping centers have overlapping market areas. 22 000259 An analysis of commercial development within and surrounding the study area suggests that most of the area's current need for retail services is provided by shopping centers and other types of commercial establishments located inside and outside the study area. Specifically, in addition to the shopping centers located within the study area, much of the study area lies within the market areas of several other shopping centers and major retail concentrations, including Chesterfield Crossing and Chesterfield Towne Center. While most retail development within the study area is healthy, some exhibit symptoms of declining retail viability ~ The demand for additional shopping center space in the future will be closely tied to market area growth. Specifically, convenience scale shopping centers typically draw most of their customers from an area of about 1.5 miles in radius (shopping center trade area). Neighborhood scale shopping centers typically have a trade area of about three miles in radius, and community scale shopping centers have a trade area of about 4.5 miles in radius~ Power and,regional centers have trade areas of about 7.5 miles in radius. Super regional centers typically have trade areas of about fifteen miles. While many of the services provided by various types of centers do not translate into competition between types, some services do. In addition, centers of a type that have overlapping trade areas often compete for the same markets. At present, the study area seems to be more than adequately served by existing and planned shopping centers. Increases in population within the market areas of potential shopping center sites generate most of the demand for additional shopping center space. Other factors affecting the demand for additional shopping center space include market competition, both within and outside the study area, and anticipated area industrial employment Specifically, existing and future shopping center development outside the study area could lower future shopping center demand within the area through competition for the same markets. Conversely, increases in population and industrial employment from new industrial development within, and in proximity to, the study area would have a positive impact, as a significant amount of retail sales would be generated by new area residents as well as by employees who live outside the corridor's market area but who will shop within the area on their way to and from work. The location of any new shopping center(s) within the study area would also be influenced by: the availability of suitably zoned land; parcel size, configuration, access and visibility; environmental constraints such as floodplains and wetlands; and by guidelines for desirable land use patterns as embodied in the county's Comprehensive Plan. The current Upper Swift Creek Plan (adopted in 1991) suggests locations for new shopping center development in the western portion of the study area, to serve the needs of anticipated area residential development. b. Commercial - - Freestanding In addition to existing and planned shopping centers, commercial development within the study area is characterized by freestanding commercial uses along Rt. 360 and in proximity to the Genito Road/Old Hundred Road intersection. Included among these uses are: small retail and convenience stores; contractors offices, shops and storage yards; motor vehicle repair; motor vehicle service stations; personal services and professional offices; fast food 23 000260 restaurants; a hotel; mini-storage and office-warehouses; a commercial outdoor recreational establishment, among other uses. About half of these uses (by acreage) have developed since 1994. The demand for additional freestanding commercial space is determined in part by the type of use occupying the site. Some freestanding uses, such as department and discount stores, have market areas similar to community scale shopping centers. Other uses, such as home centers and motor vehicle sales, draw from larger areas, to include countywide and even regional markets. Still other uses, such as convenience stores, fast food restaurants and automobile service stations, depend in large part on traffic generated by other uses, such as nearby shopping centers and employment centers, and on commuter traffic passing through the study area. The location of any new freestanding commercial space would also be influenced by: the availability of suitably zoned land; parcel size, configuration, access and visibility; and environmental constraints such as floodplains and wetlands. 3. Hotel/Motel At present, there is one hotel/motel within the study area, located at the intersection of Rt. 360 and Old Hundred Road. A site for another is currently under review, located further west along Rt. 360 in the vicinity of Woodlake. Recent hotellmotel development activity within the study area and along Rt. 360 at or near the intersection of Rt. 360 and Courthouse Road (east of the study area), suggests there may be a potential demand for additional hotellmotels in this portion of the county. 4. Industrial Development Most industrial zoning and land uses within the study area are located around the PowhitelRt. 288 interchange and the intersection of Genito and Old Hundred Roads. 24 000261. Land use - Countywide (12/31/06) County .. Land uses acre!! Land use - Upper Swift Creek Plan amendment geography (12/31/06) Upper Swift Creek Plan amendment · land uses ~ 15000 sooo land uses 25 00 262 blank page 26 000263 ~orting Document C (October 2005) Upper Swift Creek Plan Amendment: Transportation Options Maintenance and construction of Chesterfield County's road system is the responsibility of the Commonwealth of Virginia. Funding from the Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) has been inadequate to address existing needs, and the prospects for additional state funding are uncertain at best. Alternate funding sources continue to be investigated to address the shortfall between road needs and available funding. Several options have been considered for supplementing the state road funding. The following options are available to supplement state and local funding but would not be sufficient to address all of the county's needs. Options include, but are not limited to: . Transportation Service District in the Upper Swift Creek Plan Area: This would provide for an additional tax levy against real property in the service area. An assessment rate between $0.10 and $0.15 per $100 of assessed value would be required to finance $90 to $120 million in road improvements. It is estimated that this would equate to an additional $200 to $300 per year on the median tax bill of the single family property owner based on the January 2005 assessments, and greater impact for commercial and multi-family property owners. The amount of additional taxes is subject to many variables: changes in assessed values, amount financed, frequency of debt issues and overall debt repayment requirements. . Use of Cash Proffers for Road Debt Service: The 2004 General Assembly ,established local authority to use cash proffer revenues for the repayment of bonds. Discussions with rating agencies indicate unfavorable bond ratings on cash proffer backed debt due to the uncertain long-term reliance on this revenue stream. . General Obligation Bonds for Roads: Voters overwhelmingly approved the issuance of $40 million in general obligation bonds for roads in the 2004 referendum. One of the bond projects was in the plan area -- the widening of Hull Street Road between Swift Creek and Winterpock. Bonds are repaid from locally generated revenues. Additional referenda on general obligation bonds could be used in the future to fund road improvement projects. However, the county's available debt has been allocated through 2011, and there is no capacity to issue additional debt until that time~ . Reprioritization of Local Capital Improvement Funding Sources for Road Projects: The Board of Supervisors annually adopts a Capital Improvement Program (CIP) allocating funding sources to many competing 27 000264 -~-- 1- . -- jI ~ ~~~ .....~~. ,. ... a -. ~ ~r' ~ - ! .~ I ' ~ .. :rl L. . 1:- Ii .... - ., ~ t =~ -. ~ · r ~ x~ ~ I;~ l~' ~.~ " ...... ..... ~ II.J:! ~ i ~ m" ~ Ij . ":' ":t ft ) ~~ 'J~' ~ J . ~..~ ~ -;:: - .... 9 ~ ~ ~ n -"~ ~; :;, ~ r _~ 'J:ij. ;~ ) ~ ~.;:-:: .7d 1 ~ : ~ .Y~ ~ } .! .~ 5 ~ ~ ~ . ) "':1 5!;. ~~ t : J -:-" ~;I ..... -J ~' .. ~ ~ ... ~ :,:.!; 2 iI · I ,-.... "i.~.~I:::: ..... ~. I~'"L ~ · ~ "~II"''' ~ i ~I :;. . I ~ -~"'~_..~~J ~ _i . _ ... . .I . . ~,~ _ .. ~....~ : r.;.~.....- .... .... · ____ ... · : tr. : f:~ I. _ .,. ~ · . -: 'Ii:( r ISIIi.I.i ........ .... ~. ..... PII r ... R 1 .. ~.JY: ;.~ .l , L"'''' I p::r """':.l1li ~ I J - · · ~ ... DE- - : ~ o.~ ~ ~ ~.'J ~ t~~ ':Ii,.. _ ..... ... :... 1"Ior ... H""X- :.: J \ ";.. I........ ~. .-"iII ~ ~ ~ ~ : ~~ ~r.3.It .1;,' 1:11 11-: 01 .......... )1_' I~~;':' ~ tI .. .. or~. l-i~~..' I ~ ~ .II: ~ ~ ~..~ ~ .r.... -i:31l ~ .. - ... ~ -. .... ~ ' ...... 1-:-:1.... · -- ....- ^ "^ -.. 1 L'" - .---.'" ".'1" .:.. ~I: ..:i ~ ..: :.I ..T"'?.liIii. 2 M ~ _:':i ....... -. .. r PI ........ ... -.;; ... · - - r'lll .. ~ . n. ~ i1.'3~~.-~ '-Y ~.,~~ .~.,J0'~;;,,~~~'{i.~~r:5~~ ~~;::~I'(l~i; ~~~~~- ~.':::' ~--............;o:-:. .,::I'._~ ~MiH.. I ... .:;W; .~ IIW- . .~. .:~.... "-" "11.1 It. .~~:i ~ ~-~Itt'" -I.!:-v _ ~ .:~ - r- - . --.-. "Ii."~ ~I ~~....... .r:-" ;...~ ~ ~ Blank page 30 000267 Chesterfield County, Virginia Melllorandulll DATE: JULY 3, 2007 TO: CHESTERFIELD COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: STEVE SIMONSON, CHESTERFIELD COUNTY TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT SUBJECT: UPPER SWIFT CREEK PLAN AMENDMENT - ADDITIONAL MAP SHOWING THE REVISED ALIGNMENT OF THE POWHITE P ARKW A Y EXTENSION AT GENITO ROAD Please find attached a map showing both the current and proposed alignments of the Powhite Parkway Extension where it crosses Genito Road. The map also shows a very approximate "potential interchange area". The interchange area is not based on any specific design work, but simply shows an area that has been utilized for similar interchange construction in other areas of the County. It is our intention to add this map to "Supporting Document C" of the Upper Swift Creek Plan Amendment. 31 000268 # \# ~ .! ~ 32 000269 Supporting Document D TECHNIC',AL MEMORANDUM CH2MHILL Upper Swift Creek Plan Total Phosphorus Loading Analysis for Planned Land Use Scenarios PREPARED FOR: Chesterfield County Tim Hare - CH2M HILL Jamie Lynn Conner - CH2M HILL Dan Medina - CH2M HILL August 15, 2005 PREPARED BY: COPIES: DATE: Contents Co n tents .................... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ~ . . . . . . . 33 Executive Summary...~................................................................................................... .33 Introduction...... ~................ ~............................................................................................ .33 Land Use Scenario Formulation and Data Development .....~........ ...........................34 Land Use Scenario Formulation............................................................,......,........ ~34 Methodology for Impervious Fraction Calculations..... .............. ...... ........... .........35 W a~ershed Modeling.. ~,.....,.,... .. ~.... ............. ................................. .......... ............. ............. .35 P8 Modeling...............................................,. ~.. ~.. ~........................................................... .35 Reckhow Modeling.........................................,.. ~,.. ~,.. ~,. ~........................................... .38 Conclusions...,......,....,..,..,................................................................................................. . .39 References................................,.,.........,...,....................................................................... .,.. .41 Appendix A ........... .......... ,.................................,......,................ ~,... ~ ~.................................. .42 Executive Summary Annual total phosphorus (TP) loads were calculated for four scenarios, testing different housing densities for the future Upper_Swift Creek plan. In-lake phosphorus concentrations were predicted for each scenario~ Load reductions to achieve the desired in-lake concentration of 0.05 milligrams per liter (mg/L) for total phosphorus were calculated for each scenario~ The Planning Department's Preferred Alternative, Scenario B (2 dwelling units per acre) can be met using the 1999 management plan's best management practice (BMP) mix. Introduction In 1999, CH2M HILL and Timmons Group working with the County of Chesterfield, Virginia, developed the Watershed Management Master Plan and Maintenance Program for the Swift Creek Reservoir Watershed (Management Plan)~ The Management Plan was developed in response to citizen and County staff concerns that future development in the Swift Creek Reservoir watershed would lead to eutrophication and degraded water quality in the reservoir. The Swift Creek Reservoir serves both as a drinking water supply and a recreational destination. Part of the Management Plan entailed using the P8 Urban Catchment Model 33 000270 (Walker, 1990; Walker, 2000) to determine the annual TP loads and flows from the reservoir's 10 tributary watersheds and from the areas that contributed direct runoff. The results of the P8 modeling effort were in turn used as input for a predictive model developed by K. H. Reckhow (Reckhow, 1989). The Reckhow Model was used to predict the mean TP concentration in the reservoir during the summer. In 2004, CH2M HILL was contracted to update the P8 tributary models and the Reckhow Model based on current land use. In 2005, CH2M HILL and Timmons Group were tasked with evaluating four different land use scenarios in support of a revised Upper Swift Creek Plan. This technical memorandum (TM) discusses the steps to collect the required data, and evaluate the scenarios using the P8 and Reckhow models. The TM compares the results with those developed in 1999~ Land Use Scenario Formulation and Data DeveloDment Land Use Scenario Formulation The existing land use from 2004 was adopted as the base land use. Since the 2004 land use was based on tax records and current use, it provides an accurate portrait of the watershed. The County desired to model the impacts of four different scenarios on water quality. As was the case in 1999, each scenario's projected planned land use was based on the conversion of vacant land to another land use, typically residential. It was assumed that the planned land use for Powhatan County in the upper portion of the watershed would be the same as 1999. Each scenario would look at the following different residential densities: . Scenario A - 2.2 dwelling units per acre (du/ac). . Scenario B-2 du/ac. . Scenario C -1.5 du/ac. . Scenario D - 1.0 du/ac~ Scenario A uses the housing density from the 1999 study instead of the 2.0 du/ac adopted in 2000 in order to maintain continuity with the 1999 results. All four scenarios have identical non-residential land use. Conversion of vacant parcels was guided by the geographic information system version of the County's development potential database. Two fields in this database were used to determine whether an individual parcel was to be converted. The first was the field LND _ USE _ 03, which indicates the actual land use for a given parcel in 2003. All parcels with VACANT in the LND USE 03 field were identified as candidates for conversion. - - The second key field was ZONE _ 03, the existing zoning for the parcel. Vacant parcels zoned "A" indicate parcels that are subject to future development, but no such development had been officially identified for the parcel. The next step for the vacant Zone A parcels was to check the development potential database to determine whether the parcel was projected for residential or commercial development If it was projected for commercial development, then the parcel was identified as commerciaVlight industrial (eLl). If the parcel was projected for residential development, then it was assigned the appropriate land use code based on the scenario's residential densities. Vacant parcels that are zoned for any nonresidential category were projected to the corresponding land use. Residential land use was assigned to vacant parcels zoned for residential based on parcel size and the approved number of units. 34 000271. Certain parcels in the database were designated by the Planning Department as Deferred Growth Area parcels~ The Deferred Growth Area parcels all have a maximum housing density of 0.2 du/ac and are all greater than 4.5 acres. These parcels are located in 6 of the 11 contributing watersheds including: . Blackman Creek . Horsepen Creek! Deep Creek . Otterdale Creek . Swift Creek . Turkey' Creek . The direct runoff component, which corresponds to runoff directly reaching the reservoIr Methodology for Impervious Fraction Calculations One ofP8's input parameters is the impervious fraction for each subwatershed~ Impervious fractions were assigned to most land use categories based on the 1999 and 2004 modeling efforts. Impervious fractions for the converted residential areas were assigned based on the values in Table 1. TABLE 1 Impervious Fraction Revisions Upper Swift Creek Plan Modeling Support Scenario Residential Impervious Fraction Density (du lac) A 2.2-4.0 0.35 B 2.0 0.34 C 1.5 0.31 D 1.0 0.15 B, C, D Defe~red Growth 0.2 0.05 Areas Additionally, the new land use (eLl) was assigned an impervious fraction of 0.90. Using the revised impervious fraction information, the impervious fractions were calculated for each subwatershed. Watershed Modelint! P8 Modeling The 11 P8 models (10 tributary and 1 direct runoff to the lake) developed for the 2004 existing land use were modified to reflect changes in land use according to each scenario. The only change to each model was an adjustment of the impervious fraction for each subwatershed to account for land use changes~ The remaining data, including precipitation and temperature, were identical to those used in the previous modeling efforts in 1999 and 2004. Table 2 compares the land use scenarios among the three modeling efforts (1999, 2004, and current). Included in the table is a description of each scenario's development. TABLE 2 Scenario Summary Upper Swift Creek Reservoir Watershed Management Plan 35 000272 Modeling Scenario Description 1999 Existing land Use 2004 Existing land Use 1999 Projected Planned Land Use 2005 Scenario A Projected Planned land Use 2005 Scenario B Projected Planned Land Use 2005 Scenario C Projected Planned Land Use 2005 Scenario D Projected Planned Land Use Existing land use at the time of the original study. Land use updated to 2004 including existing BMPs. Planned land use projected by the original study. Based on converting vacant land to 2.2 dulae Planned land use projected by converting vacant land from 2004 Existing Land Use to 2.2 du/ae. Maintains continuity with 1999 study. Planned land use projected by converting vacant land from 2004 Existing Land Use to 2 dulac, additional conversion of 4,079 acres to RR (Deferred Growth Areas). Planned land use projected by converting vacant land from 2004 Existing Land Use to 1.5 dulac, additional conversion of 4~079 acres to RR.(Deferred Growth Areas) Planned land use projected by converting vacant land from 2004 Existing Land Use to 1 dulac, additional conversion of 4,079 acres to RR.(Deferred Growth Areas) Notes: RR = rural residential Table 3 summarizes the previous modeling efforts, breaking down by tributary watershed the TP annual loads calculated for the 1999 Existing Land Use, 2004 Existing Land Use, and the 1999 Projected Planned Land Use scenarios. TABLE 3 Summary of Previously Modeled Total Phosphorus Annual Loads Upper Swift Creek Reservoir Watershed Management Plan Watershed 1999 Existing land Use 2004 Existing land Use 1999 Projected Planned land Use TP Annual Load (Ib/yr) 12,189 14,547 43,508 The results of the tributary model runs for Scenarios A through D are summarized in Table 4. The total TP annual load for Scenario A is significantly greater than any of the other scenarios. The overall TP annual loads from Scenarios Band C are similar to each other and to the 1999 projected planned land use. Scenario D is 11 percent lower than the 1999 results. The annual loads by tributary watershed are shown in Figure 1. It is clear that several watersheds are projected to experience denser development than what was anticipated in 1999. This effect can be seen where the annual load for Scenario A exceeds the annual load for the 1999 projected planned land use by 10 percent. This is the case with Turkey Creek, Otterdale Creek, Horsepen Creek! Deep Creek, and the direct runoff component. The total annual flows generated by each scenario are similar. 36 000273 All four scenarios and the 1999 planned land use total flows fall within 3 percent of each other. TABLE 4 Summary of Total Phosphorus Annual Loads and Flows by Scenario with Deferred Growth Areas Upper Swift Creek Reservoir Watershed Management Plan Scenario A Scenario B Scenario C Scenario D 1999 Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Planned Planned Planned Planned Planned Land Use land Use land Use land Use land Use Total TP Annual Load (Ib/yr) 47,674 42,784 42, 181 38,926 43,508 Total Annual Flows (ac-ft) 100,923 99,376 99,186 98,214 100,392 37 000274 ~ I r ..:.~ :I. i · ~ . .. i I ........ ~ ~ ~.;.. ..... . :........-.. . ..... t..II 'Ji ~ -..... ~ n. · ~ -::;f ~ (~' 1 ~ . 1~ ~ ~ I~ ~ ~ "~"J ~J , .. . ...... .. Ii II! J U"I...2 ~... ~ 1" 11 ~..:.:..."I L'. 117'~ ~ ~ ..:;-II~~ 'E~ ':101 ~ ...... ~ .. ,I · ~ I'" "~I ... ~ ... ~\~1 !. -=,0': ~ ~ ~ 'J ~ ~ .fs....... ..mr I:II:;.:~ ~~ ~ F oJ x~ · ,.~::: ~..-. ~ : ~ · .nw.... II: .:LIIIl I~ h -::-:-.-l.~ ~" i'-~fJ t ~ =..1 ...:~ . · -~;:-.. : -! IrL -:;:~... .... L: Il.' 'L ~ ~.:; ~ ~."" ... I .. ~ rv ....... .... ~ v: 5 +a..... I ...)~ ~ ..II ..~ 'r1:-~{,f; ~'':I.~ ~ ~-=.--::..: .:r~I~ ~i$.~':~RI...-:!-I~li~_..~os-..I.~~"'.J:- ~.. ~~~11~":"~~.~:"~.-i=-~.."'I:...... ... .- ... ~~~ jII~-..-1 .J 1''' ~:.. :II. ._ ~. ... .... .... If · .. ...:. ".-!:. ~ ~ ~ Ii:.! "..1 · , J -=.......... .... ~ ~ I-I:t.;!i; .... ~ .. ~ "!'.I~ r~ -:- , ... J:........I. ~ ~...;::,.. ~- :.-= . ~ -~~.: !I ~~ r ~."I 1 :. "l1.~ iI"- ~~ 1 I .. - - . · : ---::r :..r-... .v: ~ ~ .=~ ~ .. TABLE 5 Load and Reductions Required to Meet Reservoir Total Phosphorous Limit (0.05 mg/L) Upper Swift Creek ResefVoir Watershed Management Plan Annual TP Load Reduction Required to Required to Annual TP Achieve 0.05 mg/L Annual Load Modeling Scenario Load (Ib/yr) (Ib/yr) (Ib/yr) 1999 Existing Land Use 12,189 N/A N/A 2004 Existing Land Use 14,547 N/A N/A 1999 Planned Land Use 43,508 25,402 18,106 2005 Scenario A Projected Planned Land Use 47,674 26,104 21,570 2005 Scenario B Projected Planned Land Use 42,784 25,767 17,017 2005 Scenario C Projected Planned Land Use 42,181 25,725 16,456 2005 Scenario D Projected Planned Land Use 38,926 25,513 13,413 The increase in impervious TP associated with the new land use eLl results in an increase in more than 4000 pounds ofTP per year. As an extra precaution, the County may want to consider additional onsite BMPs for these areas. The onsite BMPs could remove the TP load from imperviousness greater than 55 percent at all future CLl sites. 40 000277 ~ t -.. -. .-_.- - iI~ - ~ ... II ~ -- ~E :1' , I~; ~~ II ... . . ..... )I ... :"a.i.... ::.1-:::~ "II iI :I . ill 4II!I:tI. r"" .. It.I. r-:-: ~.. .t ;'01 .., .. ~ ". .. I ..... I~ ...... 'H ;. .. -:....~ -... . ~~ , , ...:~ ... ..... ~: i - .............. ~ I , -: t'"2. ~ · 11-1 .~~ i.~ .. · ~'li i~ ~- L.I:I "" · .. .mii ill ~ ~ . ::ip'J a:~S ~: .. r. ~~ ~ ~ ~ 'r ..~~ I ji ~~ ::;: :"'I . ~ ~ -. ~ I ,~ ~ L I I ~ ~ ::::.:::F ~~ .. lr L~ ~ ~ .... ."-i ~-, ~ ..... .....r: iJ II "':" ,...., ..1i . ..: I:. ~ !.I r I E ~~ ( ~ : ~ ;[ ~ ~~~..i~ - .... iIAIE".... _ ~ ~ .. ~..! I::; ..-~., .)~~ · r ~ ~ =:: r?I:IIlO _ _ ~ _' h. ~ .~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ · ~II~ ," ;-;~l~i~ ~ ~I .... ~ p=: · r/ II ___ _ I.:j \I:. · :"I" ~ Ell. ~_: ~ ~...I~~.~~ - . ~.~! I").. ..,;, ~:.j :n _....~'SoI ...I~ · ~III ~:::-' .:. II. r ~ ~!'\!:I~-~ ':'I~~: ~ I "1 -...: ~ --...'" . ~... to::r or __ ;:. .. _ ~ __ ... ~!"I r =I" .~ I'" ~ .! '...-= ~~ .:. ~~ 'I ~ ~~~ :~~~~. ,~.~.. .~... :- ~I.~"" .. ... ....-: ' .,.. . .-y. ~:"II ~~ ;... ~.. -.....t"- - · . · '.1"'.... ~, . oJ I'-: II' I..:=i .JE ~ .::: tt.. r-:: ~ ~ :'(! ~ 1.-x. -. ...... ~ .. - --. .1'_ ~~ . II! g ~ ~ ..... : \f" ~:~' -.:"I · "'. =-i ~:II Ili!a..::" ~ , "'0 -: ~ I ~ ".. ~ .. _ I :- .:::I tJ=II. · ~ tt - -- I ......: -:. __ -' - ~ :':::JII r.-.- ~~. -:: I · :...",J" ..... .. · ..... t !P,s ~. ~ _ ~ - . t ~.: ...... 2:- ...___:1 ~ ~ ~~ ~ .":"II:.wkIr 0 :...:.:... ~__~ I,~ ~ ~::: ' - K' -. - ~. "I .. · ~~..w.~~..t ~"-"l ~ ~ i ~ II ..;-::' J ;r:li"!r:~ .~."'-- ~ :r~'fJ~~ t~~~-~ ~.~~}.,[ .:-U";..t:1:;;r"' ~~ :;Jt ~ ~~!. -~~} I ,:?:-"~..:.-~ i~ ~ ........ ~ - ... '....... ~.'~I W:-~_~L. ~~ I-i ;p~~-:';':''''' ..... .......-. ~( .-.; .......- 1:-" . f;.~~. !.. ~ .,... I~ ta ~~~~r I(J.o".: ..i-(:"'2~.~.."i~~~~~4 {-..~~ 'j ~"""...7-:1~=,,~J ~~. .,~ ':P<<) r..:. .~ r....~~:"~.:.. !.:,.;;:.." - :i- "I ...., ~-:"r I Eli.. !I:I ..;.. -aJ ~ ~...!:~ ~ ~~..-.~ .,~.~:~ ~ ~~... ~.~ ..... ~:J II.~ Jill ~ ~_~ ~ -.-= ~ ~::~. -!J. ":I .J: ~ ~ ~ ... ~ ~~ -4.~" ~... _ __ .. . :..'~:,,~;;a. -:::.:. p" ~~.-:... - .~.......... ~ ...... ~ f'J:: -=-~, ~~.. -= _ ~ ... - . ... ..,...... r Af.:";: ~.... :..to ,. :-~... .-:-!~~."I~'...~":-:..: ~~. -.."'Q ~:~~~~~~-....---- : ~ ! ~ ~I"~" . r:-:= ..... ~ @ ~-.M ~~ ..:';:.~~~~r' .tr:.:-....iI.. - p.r - ....M4. : I.~J~I~. ~ -G.I:! ~ -..:;r; .... -~ ~ ~ ~.. :.!I~ ~. .~~.. r.J-. ~ I -.:. -~.. f ~. · - r r::.: p:-I ~ II - ~~ .1- ~ ~...... ~ ~ . j\fi.":~;. I _*.II~:::: !I~~~ .~"':~~:-~-""'~~:::~~fI.-i.~~t :;J1t:i~~.;r~~~ ....~I.,~.!i..~f-f,~~ ~~.~ ~~~. ~ ~~~~~~1~11. "!JI .. · · I -I ... ~ l::"; ., ... r:. iH.Ii: -.. ~ If -.J . tj' .... ~ I ~. :.r.. ~- · ....... ~ ... ~ ~ !'I . rI' ..~ r/:' J f.J r. "", ~~. - ~~~ ~,;. ." r/ .. · ' """'_ ;:-R~'" .. ~.'. ..:. -::--..:.- ~ ~ · ~~~~:~ ~ . i!=I? ~ ~ t I · , .. ~ J:. ...r:-_ -tot ... ... ": .J. .. r/ ,. ~ t.. · N' · .. - . ..;1 ZI ~.:r.o ~ -==--r..... .. ~ -.. _ _ ~ ~ r::.w... : I. .... ..f. r.: :: ... \:.. .;: ..:. t-.c -:-- ~: :":".. :.-.1 :a-~.:.... .:1'... ~ _~ ~.: _7.1.,. -:. I ~:. .. '. .. :~:- ,. ~ il... ,,=: ~ ~ ~ ...., ~ -i" ~ ~ (..' '" -::: :::..:..... · ~ .I ..1 I ~.:.. ..-i} Appendix A TABLE A-1 Summary of Previously Modeled Total Phosphorous Annual Loads, by Watershed Upper Swift Creek Reservoir Watershed Management Plan 1999 Existing land 2004 Existing 1999 Projected Use land Use Planned land Use Watershed (Ib/yr) (I b/yr) (I b/yr) Little Tomahawk Creek 754 1 ,270 2,810 Tomahawk Creek 934 1,573 6, 138 Swift Creek 3,542 3,163 10,376 Turkey Creek 751 750 2,665 Otterdale Creek 709 1,630 2,933 Horsepen Creek I Deep Creek 1,662 1,566 6,256 Blackman Creek 1,006 1,019 6,021 West Branch 580 742 1,371 Dry Creek 504 904 2,004 Fuqua Creek 415 248 1,010 Direct Runoff Component 1,333 1,682 1,924 Total 12,189 14,547 43,508 TABLE A-2 Summary of Previously Modeled Annual Flows, by Watershed Upper Swift Creek Reservoir Watershed Management Plan Watershed 1999 Existing land 2004 Existing Land 1999 Projected Use Use Planned Land Use (ac-ft I yr) (ac-ft I yr) (ac-ft I yr) 5,415 5,621 6,442 8,047 8,196 9,873 24,670 24,546 27,095 6,121 6,060 6,732 5,362 5,560 5,963 7,996 8,021 9,849 8,246 8,166 9,522 4,290 4,351 4,752 4,372 4,548 4,975 Little Tomahawk Creek Tomahawk Creek Swift Creek Turkey Creek Otterdale Creek Horsepen Creek I Deep Creek Blackman Creek West Branch Dry Creek 000279 42 TABLE A-2 Summary of Previously Modeled Annual Flows, by Watershed Upper Swift Creek Reservoir Watershed Management Plan Watershed 1999 Existing Land 2004 Existing Land 1999 Projected Use Use Planned Land Use (ac-ft I yr) (ac-ft I yr) (ac-ft I yr) 3,571 3,567 3,840 10,805 11,576 11 ,347 88,894 90,212 100,392 Fuqua Creek Direct Runoff Component Total TABLE A-3 Summary of Total Phosphorous Annual Loads by Watershed Upper Swift Creek Reservoir Watershed Management Plan Watershed Scenario A Scenario B Scenario C Scenario D 1999 Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Planned Land Planned Land Planned land Planned land Planned land Use Use Use Use Use (Ib/yr) (Ib/yr) (Ib/yr) (Ib/yr) (Ib/yr) Little Tomahawk 3,030 3,033 3,033 3,026 2,810 Creek Tomahawk Creek 6,348 6,316 6,223 5,722 6, 1 38 Swift Creek 10,632 8,840 8,760 8,334 10,376 Turkey Creek 2,855 1,003 996 938 2,665 Otterdale Creek 4,035 3,281 3, 179 2,589 2,933 Horsepen Creek I 6,256 Deep Creek 8,795 8,628 8,401 7,241 Blackman Creek 5,888 5,630 5,601 5,448 6,021 West Branch 1,959 1,958 1,947 1,873 1,371 Dry Creek 1 ,401 1,392 1,365 1 ,225 2,004 Fuqua Creek 491 489 475 400 1,010 Direct Runoff 1,924 Component 2,240 2,213 2,201 2,131 Total 47,674 42,784 42,181 38,926 43,508 43 000280 TABLE A-4 Reckhow Model Results Upper Swift Creek Reservoir Watershed Management Plan Modeling Scenario Predicted In Lake TP Concentration (mg/L) 0.031 0.035 0.074 0.078 0.073 0.073 0.069 1999 Existing Land Use 2004 Existing Land Use 1999 Planned Land Use Scenario A Scenario B Scenario C Scenario D 44 000281. Supporting Document E Existing Conditions Environmental Inventory The Upper Swift Creek Plan is one three plans for the watershed area draining to the Swift Creek Reservoir. The Upper Swift Creek Watershed is rich with natural resources that if managed properly should provide for the water quality benefits needed for the preservation of the Swift Creek Reservoir. An environmental resource inventory (ERI) was performed as part of the Watershed Management Master Plan (2000). Many of the ERI features are continuality updated, to reflect additional data and changing field conditions. The ERI is a planning tool that includes information about and location of the physical and natural features that are determined important within the boundaries of the watershed. By using this tool to identify natural resources that help maintain water quality, the county can protect the tributaries and the Reservoir in an efficient, cost effective manner. Swift Creek Reservoir Watershed Boundary: The watershed covers 61.5 square miles or approximately 42,000 acres with portions of three magisterial districts overlaying its boundaries. Generally located west of Route 288 between Route 360 and Genito Road, 85% (35,000 acres) is contained within Chesterfield County with the remaining 15% in Powhatan County. The delineation of the watershed drainage boundaries is important because that boundary defines the portion of the County to be considered when~ establishing protection measures for source water (drinking water). The watershed can be divided into eight sub-watershed areas. By segmenting the delineation, management efforts may be targeted to those areas that are most vulnerable to water quality degradation and therefore are the highest priority to protect or restore. Moving downstream the, those stream segments that are closest to the Reservoir will have the greatest impact on its water quality, while those stream segments at the top of the watershed may have less of an impact on water quality (see Figure 1). Hydrology (Tributary Streams): The Swift Creek Reservoir Watershed is made of a network of eleven streams over 248 miles long that combine to form eight sub-watersheds, which flow directly into the Reservoir: · Little'Tomahawk Creek · Tomahawk Creek · Swift.CreeklTurkey Creek · Otterdale Creek · Horsepen Creek/Blackman Creek/Deep Creek · West Branch · Dry Creek 45 000282 · Fuqua Creek The Swift Creek/Turkey Creek system drains the largest area (35 percent or approximately 14,700 acres) and the Fuque Creek drains the smallest area (4 percent or approximately 5880 acres) of the watershed. The networks of streams carry drainage from groundwater and storm flows. The physical and chemical degradation of these systems will result in increases pollutant loads, significantly affecting the water quality downstream. These effects of degradation can be further exacerbated if the stream systems become unstable and disconnected from floodplains and wetlands (see Figure 2). Geologic Features: The Upper Swift Creek Watershed is located in the Richmond coalfield, situated on a structural basin filled with Triassic-age sediments~ This basin extends to parts of Goochland, Henrico, Amelia, and Powhatan Counties. The watershed contains the part of the Clover Hill Mining District as identified in the Virginia Division of Mineral Resources Publication 85 "Mining History of The Richmond Coalfield ofVirginia~" Mining operations in the watershed consisted of Coate's Pits and Hill Shaft, which were the northernmost workings in the District. Both operations were shut down by the mid 1800s. Another geologic feature of note is the existence of petrified wood formations found primarily in the Otterdale and Tomahawk Creek watersheds~ The watershed also contains a large number of established spring fed ponds typically found in the upper reaches of sub-watersheds. Many streams in the watershed have been found to have their origin at or near groundwater springheads. While not unique to this watershed, these ponds and springs illustrate the importance that groundwater resources have played in the history of the area (See Figure 3). Wetlands: W etlands ~e those areas that are inundated or saturated by surface or groundwater at a frequency and' duration sufficient to support a prevalence of vegetation typically adapted for life in saturated soils conditions. These wetland resources are especially valuable for the protection ,and preservation of terrestrial and aquatic habitats and wildlife. In their natural conditions they provide flood control, water quality and maintain stream flow. Often these wetlands can be damaged by alterations to their associated streams. For example, down cutting, caused by increased storm flow volumes to a stream can lead to a draining or a drying of the wetland, reducing its quality and the overall water quality of the stream. Providing additional forested buffer for wetland resources will work to keep these systems intact, protecting the water quality of the Reservoir. Wetlands account for approximately 5289 acres or 12 percent of the total acreage of the Swift Creek Reservoir Watershed. The greatest wetland acreage is concentrated at the lower stream reaches, near the head of the reservoir. Acreage decreases progressively upstream and is minimal at the headwaters. The greatest wetland acreage and diversity are associated with Swift Creek (approximately 853 acres or 16 percent) while the least 000283 46 acreage and diversity is associated with Little Tomahawk Creek (approximately 146 acres or 3 percent). The Horsepen Creek/Blackman Creek/Deep Creek system accounts for approximately the second largest wetland acreage (approximately 519 acres or 10 percent) within the watershed (see Figure 4). The dominant wetland type found is palustrine forested or bottomland hardwood forest. Bottomland hardwood forests are flat lowlands along streams or rivers usually on alluvial floodplains that are periodically flooded. They generally have a linear form as a consequence of their proximity to streams. Many of the stream systems in the watershed are associated with high quality wetlands~ Swift Creek, Horsepen Creek and Blackman Creek contain a combination of large forest wetlands, high quality scrub-shrub and emergent wetlands~ Reservoir" Lakes & Ponds: The Swift Creek Reservoir was constructed in 1966 and includes aI, 700-acre impoundment with 5.0 billion gallon capacity. Its mean depth when full is nine feet The plant has a production capacity of 12 Mgal/Day. An additional 221 acres of impoundments (ponds and lakes) can be found throughout the Swift Creek Reservoir Watershed. These ponds were created as recreational or farm ponds facilities~ As development occurs these facilities will have storm water treatment potential. Topographv and Soils: Soils have inherent characteristics that control their ability to retain or transmit water, and their stability. The Swift Creek Reservoir Watershed lies west of the Fall Line within the Central Piedmont Physiographic Province. The topography of the planning area consists principally of flatlands and gently rolling hills typical of this region~ The Soil Survey of Chesterfield County, Virginia (U~S~ Department of Agriculture-Soil Conservation Service [USDA-SCS], 1978) indicates the dominant soil association found within this area is Creedmor-Mayodan. This association is formed from material weathered from Triassic sandstone and shale compressed together (see Figure 5). The soils can be characterized as well drained clayey to gravelly clayey. They are low in organic-matter content, low in natural fertility, and can be strongly acidic. The soil survey also identifies eight hydric soil series within the watershed that are associated with floodplains, drainageways, and depressions and their runoff potential (see Figure 6)~ Knowledge of soil sciences is an important factor in determining the amount of erosion and stormwater runoff that could occur during development. This knowledge is also important for the application of available land management techniques and alternative stormwater treatments. 47 000284 Flood Plains: Flooding is a natural process that protects stream channels and beds form erosive forces during elevated storm flows. When inundated, the floodplain acts as a natural flood and erosion control, decreasing the magnitude of floods downstream. Decreasing the magnitude of flooding is beneficial for landowners in riparian areas and aquatic wildlife. In addition, the floodplain protects water quality by filtering runoff and promoting groundwater recharge. Finally, floodplain wetlands act as nutrient and sediment sinks, which also improves water quality in streams. This land area serves many functions and provides important habitats for wildlife (see Figure 7). Stream Corridor Buffer: In respons.e to the Chesapeake Bay Preservation Act of 1988, Chesterfield County enacted the Chesapeake Bay Preservation Ordinance in 1990 (Ordinance). The ordinance protects environmentally sensitive features from improper development that would contribute to the significant degradation of the water quality of the County's waters, which drain into the Chesapeake Bay~ Chesapeake Bay Preservation Areas include Resource Protection Areas (RPAs) and Resource Management Areas (Rl\.fAs), which are subject to the criteria set forth in the Ordinance. RP As are environmentally sensitive lands at or near the shoreline that have an intrinsic water quality value due to the ecological and biological processes they perform or are sensitive to impacts that may cause significant degradation to the quality of County waters. In their natural condition, these lands provide for the removal, reduction, or assimilation of sediments, nutrients, and pollution runoff entering the Chesapeake Bay and its tributaries. Rl\.fAs are land types that, if improperly used or developed, have a potential for causing significant water quality degradation or for diminishing the functional value of the RP A. The RPA boundaries include 100-foot-wide buffers adjacent to and landward of the nontidal wetlands. The County has generally mapped RP A boundaries within the Swift Creek Reservoir Watershed according to hydric soil maps from the Soil Survey of Chesterfield County, Virginia. The RP A boundary extends 1 00- feet outward from the hydric soil boundary. In 2004, amendments to the Ordinance required site-specific determinations of perennial flow which thereby requiring buffers to be located along these stream s~gments. The County Resource Protection and Boundaries map identifies this buffer (see Figure 8). The area ofRPA within the Swift Creek Reservoir Watershed, as of July 2006, was approximately 8.52 square miles or 5,454 acres. This includes 149,934 feet or 28.4 miles of perennial stream. Rare" Threaten and Endangered SDecies: 000285 48 Identification and protection of areas that contain rare, threaten and endangered species require special concems~ As described in the assessment conducted in 2000, Swift Creek Watershed has no federally endangered species known to exist within its bounds. Several species of plants are considered state-rare with one amphibian (Barking Tree Frog) considered state-threatened. The Bald Eagle was the only species considered both state and federal threatened. Wildlife: A vast array of wildlife to include deer, beavers, fox, hawks, eagles, ospreys, waterfowl, and heron rookeries are found along the Reservoir, wetlands, and forests throughout the watershed. A state birdwatching route cuts through the center of the watershed along Genito Road. The Reservoir has an abundant population of fmfish, which includes the highest number of state citations for Chain Pickerel in 2005 Protecting contiguous forest and riparian corridors from development and encroachment is fundamental to maintaining a healthy wildlife population throughout the watershed. Cultural Resources: Background research to locate and identify documented cultural resources in the Swift Creek Reservoir Watershed was conducted by CH2M HILL in 2000. This information was used to develop historic contexts for evaluating the archaeological and architectural resources located in the watershed. Information on documented cultural resources was obtained from the Virginia Department of Historic Resources (VDHR) in Richmond, Virginia. Figure 9 shows the location of historic structures and documented archaeological sites in the watershed. Due to the rich natural resources of the area many of the historic structures located in this area can be found associated with these resources in the form of spring houses, mill runs, and earthen dams. 49 000286 -... ~ 1'1" . . .. ~~ .'1 !IIr ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ . ~ ... - ~. I ...:. ~ __~.. ~. . '.. · ----........... -.:. II .~ .1- ~ II!" if J I..,." . ~ i - ~r:..-..... -:.... ~p :-1.1= III. IJ r~ .. ""l1lI -=-- EI ~ -..:i __ _I :I-::i t"i .- - r .. ... ...... ~..... ~ ~ I. :M . t=:'r..~~ ~ ... _-- ~ ~ ~ . II] =- · · ., ~ .J T ~ .... ~ .J ........ ti I' · mt i.~'" ~ D ~ II!:!I ~-...... ~~ ~ ~ 5ij-~~ ~~~ ~ ~r- ~~ ,~ ~ ~ 2. l2.. '- -. i: iIIi , ~ -.::. ~. ~:r r ~~ ,. ,11: J-: ~ I ., .~~~ ~ ~ ~ ..-.... ~~~ii ~, 'i':I ~J i ;SS ~..... -.. · ~ · J ,} ~ ~i . r, r~ .:.:J ~ i ::. !l1.... L ~ I )I .. ~ 7": ..~ ..........;...... ....... ~ .~I1.~r::,I'~..~ ~ ?!.I L ~.~:::~ ..~E 2:r.r. ~ ~ ~..i,!~~1I_...... ~ .:~ .~ t' ".:.-}f'; -;: ~. I ~!jp .. -:-. . ~~:~ r .;;:..-=..1.. ..'1;:.L ]t.l 'II ~ ~r:. .r."~..... ~~-:- ~ 1 · · rJ '1 '!i ~:-1 ~.:f4.:..... ..-.::-.~ ~ - ~ .-:.:. ~ - ... -.; J . .\ ~~.~ I.~I ~~ .-~~~ .-- I . 1 I=ii ~III~ .... ...... II .;'1 ~~ ~ Jill':' J:II?! - ~ I ;;. ::i:~-~ ~,... ........ - ~ I-=-"oi. ....... ~ ==--. , . I -:II~ ~ :::~.~ ~ ! iI~~ I~ ~ ~ ~ ~I ' ...~ ~ ~I i~~ ~ jI. J S ..i-iI!:.J I --= II! ~ :r, ~.. ~ ~~ ,J ~~ ' I ? q:E~\.t ~~_ ~ .. ~ r ~ .. :s.1.:o~ ~;-r a ~.. . -.. ..~-~ ....-- · ~~ ~ f ~ ~:::. ~..~.: .:.... · 1 ~. ~~J~ ~~ ~ iiK "jjl~ ....... ;l.1.:!.... it; Ii..;bl. . .-:.. ~ .....; .J;~" .. ~ ~~"tJ .. ;,... ..~ ... =' ..rk .. !I ....:~~....trt'! . 1 :II" ... ~ ~ .... _~i-JI.'" ~ ~ ..~. :2: &'; · r I -. ~ .........""i.. J '1[- '-~:'8-:-j :rn: ~.. ) ~. .--",,"!k. !!: .... . ~~ .~ ""~jit , "!. ~~ft'f':i!f'" · Ie I!l':::-,."t"..~ .r~ I - ~;j!Ii.i:A, ~ ..... ... .~:"tf2~.,x.. · · t ~~ .:to. ~ ~ iili2 I f~ ~ t ... ~ jI~1 ~I~ -: 31 ~~t,7.' ~ t"" r ~~ .:i-': .IA -.:~,;.. ~r ~~~ .~~.~I ~W-n. r......:I..-"Qo.. ~ _"*... U ~ ~'I ..1." I :.,.~ .. ... · 7'Ii.J ~ t ..... ~ ... ~ LJ.:.Ii, :..... ~ .. · r""I"III - :r., ~ =- ... ~ · .l1l:;I' · ~ ~ ~,.p.. ...~...... _ =-I-l' ~ r+ I -.., :-.- If-. ,.... . ~ ... 1 I'" 1 ~ ~~. · ..... ... ..1 _ ~ I .. i ~...:;:.... ~..,:i:..... ...;:Ji ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~.-"'-1'~ ~ ~~...~ ":i-~l.il~. = ~ J ~=-:- ~.:. ~~; ~~ ~ ~ L f. 1 11i ~1I.. ... 'J,C;; . . ~~. - .: ~. ~ ... II \ --= ':'1i~ .... of ~ '- ~ IL.. J":. 1 ~.... ~ .Il · -:.~ p ..;; ...... ---- -r/" ~:.... F- ~ - ........ ..,. ~ ~..].I I ~ .':...1 : rt. ~ # l1li.:. .... I :.:.-. · t& .. .e.. "J ,j .. · ." ".. : .. ::I ~ )., Pi ., ~ ~ . ' :..--=: f _11 ," F '^" '-Z:JJ iL - ~ -= ... -:,} .... ~ 1-111 ~:.-. ... _ · ....... 10:1........ ~~ ........:...I.!'" ..}. -............. yo--=:.. .... ~~ , PI .r(. r PII",~,; r ..- 17 ". iII~:N.1-%I -....: Ii: · .. ....~ -.; · - III III J'~. '1- : ~. -....... - - :i!'...~ (..M , L. "T_:!!....~ Y i;" ~....,.. ri ~ ~ ~~ · ..I:"~ ~::L ... ",I ~ J .:.IIIIi:i!- ~'I ~.-~....~ ::;.~.{~~ ~ I ~.. ~~~~~~' ~-1~~ ~l'k.li~iI'~~ ~~ f}.i~~--!j:. ~~.;-~~i~ ~~~:,=,,"~.;.~. k;;r;.~~ i .r:';-:-.f"~~I"t."""~"~r ~ 1 11;;rtt~::I~ I~!.. ~~~~-;=;-~ -. ~~ ~1~\..""...w~~:.; "~.~".t:l ~ b..7~- ~,.. -:-.. ~ ~~~ A .J .~ :I': 1..::':- · -' .... .. l1"li ~r.... ~ . ~ 1:. ~ .1.I'r ..,....... r ...,'" ..... .!i:.! ~ : 1 _ i~ I-=:-.S ~ I~ ==' .I~" 1Ii~. -.~.. "'-:r:-...~~) 1 :t!ll~~:"I:W I. ~~ /:titi2,.: ~':"l. ~ ~:~ :']'1~II.1~:.. I..t(~J =- ~~~.~~:\..:.."'~ .. \..;.:~..~.W~ i"'~~.~:-~='" ., ~.:;.~~r~.:''''~.:----:.-i~ :3;-1i;:~......::. _~, i :. "'~..-.~ 7'-: .1..:. I~.r ~.. ~-;;. ".:... .-:-=:. r/' ii:~~..I. ,L:.~ : ..~~~ . ~_-.. ..,;..r..{.... -;-.,..j.:: ~.. 'Io~ .~ ;51I~~I::--,=---~ .. · I · r..... '.. -= I · _ _po: ': "i.^. ... '... -:. · I, I" ':." .. it.-: -.1.--= ~ ~ r ...,. Co r..... _ .. ~ . ~"'I_ ~... f J~ .:--.:. ~."i. ....:~.I... _"-!" _II".!'.. I .. . ..... -=-.. .. i..::.. A ..!: ::c--.: : .": I. ~:.... (. .~~~r' ~ , --- I!........ r................ ~...L....r..l........ .......:.. _.: :!.~I ~ I .. 1ft: :, ..;. "II. ~ I ~ ~.- 'II~ ~ ; ~~ .~ ~ ~ . ~ ,...... . III.,. .r .~~ iiIIiJ.~ ;~ ~ II..~ . !~ -III:!!:--~ ~ , :: ~ ~~~ -:: I' -- ~.. I: ~ ~ ~ I ~~ ~..~ II ~Ir:~~ ~ ~!I ~ :;.. , · III .. 'L.: :r: IJ iii I" ~ - III -:11 '" - - - , r =.;:x ~ . ~ I ~!~ i ~~I :- ..... ... r + - .. ~ -:. OIl .r .. .... 1 I - ~~ 'L ~ ; ..,. Q .. I~ .J {J ~:I E. !! . ~ t ~ . iiijl ~ ::..~- . 3~~ ~ -: O'>f.;~ ~ · '" ~..~ 1:... :€"~ i; /, "f.; I 'I~_'~ ~.~ _ :I .~ 511 ,..-:~ _~:1II 1~ ~ G.\!~ :-Ji IoIIi .d: L_ --------' .:t!=I "U , _ . [l ~ . t tI ...:-i~ ~ ~ · U ~ I .~ _ """'-'E~ ;;ILKJ ~ -"~ ~ 8~ I !~~, ::... ~.~ '= ~lo ~ t:: ~:J ~ Ii ':"'~~~Ir ~ ~1~ :.1'= ~-a ~I~i.~ (-~ ~ 111~ ~~ iJ!lM.?i ~ ;~~I,}o oj ~I ~ ii!:.1 ~ ,:;;dIJ ~ ",. r-.~ ~~ Ii..:l I~- I I~ ~~7'" ~~'-' ... :-..~.. ~t1" I~ tt II I :I =- ~... ...... ... L ..""1 - - - - 'IZII" .... ~. I.....t' - :. ~ :Ii) ..:. ~ .,.. ~ .. .... ..... IIIIIiI · :::L 11:1 I '".""L"' .... ~,... _.Jt:. .. I" -. .. ~ · ... y ..... .. ~ .... I ~ :~ 11 1"1 rr". ~ pi" ....,. ~.r :--;. --:-.~ :t~ ~ 1/'1 .___ ..:.1 ~,. ~ i:tii' ;.;. r: ~. ~ I. .J ...... ~ r. ~ t i ::::i..:-I: - :!I ' I -.... .....- -:-. .. ~~ ~. ~. ... I. r _.... ~~".\::. ~ .- · !=I! ~ ........ ~? ~ 1 - I ...-;. ... .. ..htII' ...:. .~ I ~. -... ""!I-~ ~ I ~ ;..K: ~ -~~~ i-=I ii. ~II. S I' ~ I III~ :i. 1 m;:-.... t.:-. 1 J 1: ., ..."'1-....... ~ ~ ' '. .. -... ... ~") iI ;! _.... ... .. ~ Isr _ ~ ~.. ~ ~ \"i- ~ I ~ fI.:~.~..-,: ~ '-~-"'11~~ _.r~:JIi ~.,. ~ .~""I ~ J_: ~~ ... I" .' ...:... ..... ~ If.:=-.~ ~"I:~~:':;'; . ') m , w::.t ~;~::. ~ ~11~"" ~...~ t't~: I. ...= "J . ~:r-i:/.9'.i.. "~.o:I~'" . .'C.~ ~~~ ~ ;~~ ... · -~ ~ ..1 u.:: II. . II -:: ~ · r iL P:-( .- .~ .-;; - -.1. ,............. -....:. ~..... -:...J 't ....., ~ ~ I.\. !.r-.~-.. ... .J!:B .:;wI ...,..... .JJ · '!I:J · , --.. --..... .. .. .... ..... :- I · ~...- ...-;;; -:.... ... ~ r-- ~ -..: ~ . :. &.: · 3.... ...... n. :...:-:.. 1'=1~" ---:-..-:=. ~ ~ ....~ ~ ~~ ~~ :1". r\. · .r 1:. I:" -..J.!!i! :::.~. · ~~- - t:J.1 .,r ~ ~I ~ ~.. .. .1 :11 I ... .~-::II . .. . · ... · - ~ 1 ill . .L.. ~ ~ ~ "Ii;I I..:t . .:'-.: .III t;t ~ .. ~ ~ - - 21........ -- .:.. - · · ...: :.::. ...-.-. I ...,.. -F JI .. ... .:r-. . 'T - ~ · · II .1".:";',. I .-: - -:-:: ..: I:;: ~ .=.a!l...... -a ~ j:-- .oW ' ~ I~ -m ~ ... IT.....' .......=....:.. t:r .:- ... ~ ~ v:;UII .. · · ~ .... ~ f\I\ "'i ~ Rr .. - · ~t~~~~"1 :~~"'~.:~"t-"-~.~"':"".N ,"~~.~~..fdr.r~~~~..~~. f~"I.L~}11l::. · ~.I:~~).:Ii ~~~~~ I}" }_hl~8-:.... :J;.;-:'; ~~~.,~. ~..r::--,t.~f r-~. .....~~r~~~ I ,~~-l :I, ....1;. · · ~ ~ -, · -'CI: "i~~ ~ ~ · ~ -.; ;f.1 · ~~ :'^ .... · ~... ':.n:. ,-. . '-.tt. ~ ~;; · ~ ~. .... .... ~ ~ ~ ..._~;~~w. ~ ..- .r:.~ '. 1: ~".:~I:t'~~_=!:.:, -:-,j.....; _...~....-..... ~.....~~.".--:-. r !.~ .,.r..t :"::'~"I .. :-i... .1 .,:.. I: ~:=-,..::! ..':.r~. _ ~ ~ ~III ~ I~~ I "'III ~..., ,~~ i.. -: "I .. J ?t~~)1~~ 'J ~ ~. I ~ .. :. Qi;::,;: -:--E' I~ ~ I.. ~ :;.~..:::' ~] ~ .1:1 .. ~ ~L "IIi.. -i~- ~ ~- ~ .~~~"::' '~ I-i Li~ .?L"'-: I .. :;. ..... .. · i-. -JJ .. . II-: ~ -- - ~ _...: ;.: I. . I: .;ll'..". I~I-I ... .. .. I r.... · ' .::i-wi .. ~~ . ..... _ r /-. r'" .. III d :-11 ~.: I ~ -... ... .... - , ... -....... ....... - .~ .~ ~ ..... .. ~ - -~/.-.. ...~-:-.y~ :.i-:.~m~t!~ LL ........ . ~ . fI on;... !!,g~.":'1II EN . . '_I ~.~ :-. ~II:~. m -: J ..., n -,-' ~ .....~ · ~ . .II II.. ....., .. "'K-I. I~ ~.;- , ~ .":i '~ ~.. ~ ~. -::.~ ~ 1J 7t.:~.,"'. :..- -:i!i=- ~ - -- ~ ~ il ,,-: ~ I:; ::: f:I:II..: ~.I!=:=..:::-.:.. .-=-- .. -:,: ... ..~ ~ :" !i 1'-: ~ · .. ..~~... r ~ "': -, .-..1.. ~:i: :. ~ ~ ..:.: . ~ 11:..-: ~ ~s.::.. E~~ -.--.i..!. to:::"":"* or · ~.... ~ -: ~ '- ~I ':Ii3 ~. J.. · ~ ~ .. ~ r""-:-, E........ . .-- ,,=;..: :'1 i ""::;}I i2-.:.. ~ ~ . ~-:L: "II ~ ...:-:.? }I ~ :: - -:....~ f - II-: ~~ i.-~ ~"~!Io -... ~ ..,.-~~ ~ ~ J.i;.l ].~ ..~ ..~ y ~-~.; .. ~ R ..~ 1 ~\:~:. -: . ~ -1:a I-J ~ .. .. .... . --- 7' .I' .... ... ~.,j. ~ t!., ~t.. - ~.-"; ~ ~ f i ...' -.:~ l ~~.7 ~r - ...-- .. - ~ ~ ':iI ff-- ar..n.- r"""':""I ~.. 1:.1 · ~ ~ ~ ~ -~~r~~~ (l ~ ~~.~~~ ~ 1 {D ~~ ,ffi~}. ~ f ~~:.! '\1 I ~.~~ ~;~.L(:~~ ~Wf '~~~i:~~~I:'"' ~~;i ~~~.~~W~ :;-iL~ ~\I.ijl .. · . 'fi"<- · ;91:..: ~ fr: ~ ~ ~ ~ ""~I t. · ... ......... ~ ... ...... 1 ";I. ..5.' J'- - i ,} · .. 1 ~. :r--.""':":"I. .. ,.._ t~ '.. 1. '"/. ,jl ~ ~.....'" - -: ~ 2 · ~ ~ ~ II. ,. :-.:... --- -- .- ~ J ... ~ ~..... L, .. ~j. 1 · . .i .:Ii III ~ ~~ .... ~ ~ h ~~ ~~..~~~~- ~ ~ tr~.1Ij ~L~ ~~ ~q .:..... ...&:L"- . ~ ::- .:J t"~ _ 1. :. t _ - ~.....:. fJ:~ f~J II ':I I'" · · ~ ~ l J~......:J ~ ~...- · I .' ~ "!J!i ~ ~ ==.......... ~~ J ~ ~i.J ~ J "!.-::.~r 1-. ~ ~ ::::.~. :.; ~... :R:I ~ ~,~ ~. ~ ~ :-:).: _.."1 ~.....I:;- I . ~. :.L: _ ~;. ~ ~: =-I r .AL.. :.-~. ~::~J I" ~~. ... .: .. .:1tI...~~. ..... . . -: ..... -:....~ ~ . ..... .. ... ~ r. :'01.. ~(~ .=:.. . ::-~~.. ~ ~ Ii'. II. .... ~ -rf.. .. r'Ii .. ::;:~. _ " ...~., · ... .. .r::~~ .. JoIIIIL- ... ----- ~ .. 1 ..IIi. · .. . -.::-.... ll' ":'i":~. ~'! ~ 1Ii.... """'" .... - ,. Po. ~ ....... . ..~ · .~. .. ~~) c ~ I~~" .'P: 2:/:.'-~"1i~ - .. ~~ ._~II~ ~~ ~: · - t ~ ~, Iti~/1Ii: r~.... ~",,::....: I' ~ :\oj 2;hi.f!1:.:>~~;;<tt 'IT - ~ ~ · .. I"" ~:o""i :,:.: ... '~ """C'=: -..' ....~ .... - ) ~. I.:... ~" v. ..;" ~ ~. ~:.I · ~... , itl""" ~ - _I ".j L'" ~ ..~~"t~:/~~~~~:\~I ~,~~.........~~..~~,.. ~~I.~~~ (..- ~~\~ .;{.~ ~/; ~~...~~.~,: ~l 1) ~1 ~~?~ ~ ~ ~~f: $~;c:.'~~ ~ L,,~": 1 I_~I... .:. 't II f I'Ii-~~If~ ~:; ..-, ~ · ~'iI..;.. ~P;:.~'~~~ ~.~f1: .-t-::(~~i ~ ~.rr.,v.l:;f 10: .E~~ ~ 'H....... .- .....:~-J ~":.II~h':'~'I~ .-- · 11=#3..... .:.:wf":- II:~U).- · ~"'I6!iI~:I~. ?~~~ . -=.::-... ..-.a"o". "l............._:.~ ~II ' ~~ .~~ ._;,IA . : "'~_'~:/~- .. _ · ~~~'~ 'M ~=~~_.. .-..~ -... :":'~ L... _.:. ,~.!: t. ~: ") ?,i:.:':";I~ ~ · r. · J ..... ~ ..~ · · ":.- ~ -,-,r.lt;"r::-!:I-'. ~ .:..r .. - · '2" :J.". _ ..... ... ,. .. · ~ %: rl:: ...~ -:: ~ .~ ..1:1;'- tool:.. ~ --. -, · ~ .J-t-..~.. · ...... ....~.t: ~ I',......~, C" ,''' .. ~ .. iJL. .:-..~ ~ · .. ;; . .... ~ · :. ... L. ~ ...... · ,. ~. ....,.. · .. i -.;; . .. T.. .::: -: ry ........ :.l...... ~ .. . ~ r... · ":- .=..:..... ::- 11"1: ..-..:r 1 ~. S~,." · .. · ... _ ~ :t: ....ro-.: -... ~.:." ~., .: ~ ~:::. .1 :. ./.-1 -,} } · i _ -: --!-- ~~_"'I: ._~...!: :;.z:~~ · ........ ... .R ~ ~ ~ -.J i: "i' . -... .t:.. ::-1. ~ -:."Y. ~;r. ::;.. ~ ;. .... ~...." · ....;~ .-.t-._i .-:~ .....~-........L.~ ... ;~:.~. :~~...~ i?W:..~ .. .: ::~.:::. ~.J.,} ~ ~ .. ~ ~. --;-:.. · · --." ,- ~Jb.=I!. 1 'i.... -R~ ~~ ~ ..... ~. - or .-.. ~" -~ · ... ..~... · -:v:: .1';" ~ fn&..': · i)- - · · · .. · -=.. : o;I~ ,}::.:- :L:-: ! .. ~... .: -.... ~ ; ~ :;;.. t · .~ ...... ,.... -=i ~.. ......- -:J... /.. .:/ 1 : IJ,. } It -r I . · .....: ..... .-:: =-- .....:. ....... :-t: ": i'I .1 ~. .r:. --: ~... -= ~ -. .. . : · -: =- -. ...:: .; - ~:: u.: ZL" .,,1' .... ~~: ,,~ 1..;... ~ ~.~: ..;.. .~:.II ~..-= ~ -:I...: .:...""(. ..1. tfF: .:. ..~ . ':" =:-.-: :....;:'-= --=zY... ~.._ r. .... .... ..:}i ~ .~-, .:. ~ ~... _ :.... . 'i' ~.II . -.r-; ;.- -: .>> ., --~ -:1Ii, .:.: ................ ... -- . , ~ '-~~ I; ...q-: ~~ r ;;& ~ Ii!-~ .. 'I: i -: ....,~. ~.~~..,.;, ~ ~ ~ ~~~. ~~~~ · ..Jii, . -===.... !P'. t. ~ .:. ... . _I :~~, , I::' ' E.:' I. ~:r. r - <<'I..... I. j:-S ...... ..: :... .... --.. .-.:J:. r: ....... ~ ./. ~ ~~ ~~ lll: ~:~~ . ~ ~~ Jill - - - - .- .......-"lIo .. -.-;II -~ - ........ ........ -.-..... - - 1- ~ · ~~ .... · I':; .....:.-..:- ... --- ..........-.. --- :;, ':I!~ . ~ _ r.... 'I" ~I ~ .... r .- I:.7i ~::-... '4.1:. ---- - -=. -.' .... I "I ~ .. -..-... -~": ..-.::J:: ~. F ;.. .... ~... .R1ft .. ._~~(R - ~ ~ ..~~. ~ ~i'" r~ f.i · -- to. !!IF -- .........,. rl1 E! 1 ~... .r ~ ..... ~ ~.~ ~ ~n ~.. --!-.. ......- - ~...r~ ~ I ~J --=?J"." .,.-~ .~~ '~-:'i:~ ~ iIIr rJ . I ... .- ..: ~ '$J ~ .-.,. ~ II PI. J -......... .- ~J ~ :--..~ .:." )JI~. I L ~ r-; ~ .~':."!I ~ !:.II.: J ~ ~ .U ~ '.1 ~~t.. ' . ~~ ~~ -~ J · I . ... . -=-- ... -....:. l. r. · 1:1 ,.r..... ~ ~ .~J.t.~ ~ J ...... ..,j. I ~ WrJi: .... . .. ... ,. ~~. .. ~lt~ ~i~ .. .. ':.I: I ~~ -: . ~ ~' ~ II:. ~ · -:. -:-:r- · .. .-.EI ~ 'I . . ... -. l-- ., . !iii '.:.5=. .... ~ ~~~-'" '" ~ ~ :.; .~.~ ~~:I~~ .It! i:I :::--:: ."1 .:-II C'I.... 401:.Z:1i: .... , I ~ ---: ~ .~ li .-..- ~ I~; i~ ~.~ ~~..~ ~ i!: ~!:iG : ~ ~ iJ\.~ -- .~:~I ~ :-:. ~ ..~ ~ ..... .... I~ ~~ , -- ~ ~ i ;, . "'t fI .:.:.. .. ... .~ f-i ~ ~ . ~ ~~ {, , . I' 3 ~ ~ ~ -- S~ ~ ~~;! t.J~.~~. ~ II .., , ~ ~ ~ ~~~i ~ [ .. ~ ~ :::':':~ ~ :.:J ( ~"..oiI ~ ; : ~ i ~~ · ~ ~ _ ~ ~ r .......... .. ') I 1!.I..t ... - ...... .. ...... -: ~ -... .l.: :: ]:::111 . 01 ..-:. --y ~ I ~ I U .:...: WE-::1 I -- ....... ~.....:.:. J;' ~ · .. L' -.: ~ -- p-.: ~.. rlllf I ........ .... ... - ~ ....-: . 'E .., pi =JI - r:l..::i · :- 1 ...... ~ ... 'I" .~~.1Ii ~::1 ~ II' ~ U ... ~ ~ i'.:IE 1(- ~.. -.3 ~ .-: .. ":. I m .. .. ."1 ~ . I · ill. J .... IIJ ~ :"I ... ............ L - rJ r:: .} .. r.J · II!!" · ..... · I · L: . ..... ~............ g .;. ..::. PI 1"-"!IoI .... ~. .: -"tt >: · aK:: { .:11 '1_ .... ~~- --! ."1 ...... .... ....,/ _-. .. ...,iJ . ~~. - .......... ~ ;Q · r: .... ~ - ~ . T. ......:11 ~ ~ I I ..... i"I"": - ~ ..::... ~.....~..., _ -r =..::: 1 ~~~ . ~ :II! 10=' .-.;1 Ai I J . -.-. ".. ~ .:... ...,;- ;:.1 ~::: ...... ~:.o.-... .... JJ. ... · · . ~. "'" .!: r:r ..! ~.~ ~.1,~.~-~ ~ or.: ~ r ~~~. ~~... J ! ,'I .. .... ~~ ~ :'I ..I~ ,~ ',Ia. -:.II ~ ~ .~ ~ -~, ~ ..-:rIll. ;0:-:. ~ )~. ..."1 [. ~...~ ;.,:-;.: · .: ~ 1i :;:.::. Ii" ~ :l ~ Iol t ~~ ~ ~ _~ '" ~- ~. -:- ~ -c r..:;- :.::: ~ :.t · *-:~ ~ '... to ~ r.~ ~ .....~ . ~ ~ ~ 11;' :i')-.:."1"~ ~ ~~. \"'* ~ ~,-. -.. -";] ~.. } r"!II=j.r~-:=.!.:I~~~~. ,q ':"" ~~l ;.3.;. ~.I-:"'. .~-Q-J. ~.I~~ r.. ~I::iI~ ':.. H.;~m'y~.... ~.,. "'rt-:i..J..: .-..?- k~~.:i~ ).~~ · _-i1~.- :-- 1\:':- ~ nv ..:.-....~...:.j! ~~~.i-": .'.~~~~~ 1 ~ .:':..~.. ...~~ -: ....A...y ~....:.i: .......~. 11:'~.~ _ ~~....~ .......~ r~- ....1":" ''''''10 ............~.-'...~~. ~ :: ~.-:....... .--:{7.... · . ~ - ~.-(....,r.1 :..v ~i:I · ..rr=-+-:,...i!- Y-:. rI'r" ~ ; ~ ' W. ..~ ~ : ~""I r:.. ':".-... ~ ~~.;;2'...:. i ~ · .. .~.: ~ 't ~ · ... . .::. ": . · ~ r -.- · -)0 ~. .. ~ . i.. ...... -= :..":~ : - ..~ :,....r. r:: .-=-"7. t-!r ..L ~ -::. "M ..... ..-. : . .I. ~ ~ -=..:-=- .: .(.~ · ~.~. . :.~ ~ t ~~.: : -: .:"1 ~ I~" ..... .i · ... : · ... : -::- :. ..;.!-'II. . . .."i" J ...... "-::=... .. . -) .. (. t Executive Summary: ... ~...... ................................... ~.................. a...... .a.........................2 Introducti on: . . . . . . . . . . ~ ~ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . - a a _ _ . . . . . . . . . . ~ ~ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3 Results: ._........._.__........ _..................... ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~.~................ .aaa_aa........ ~ ~................................ 7 Discussion:................................ ~. ~.. ~ ............... aaa.aaaaaaa..... ~ ~ ~ ~.......................... .aaaaaa.......lS Re ferenc es: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ~ . ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . . . _ _ _ . . . . a a a a a _ . . _ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . - a a a a - . . . . . . . . . . . . . .22 List of Maps 'I Tables and Figures: Map 1. Upper Swift Creek Bioassessment Sites, 2002 - 2005 ................................ 7 Map 2. Most Recent Water Quality Assessments ....................................................22 Table 1. Site Locations and Physiographic Data.................................................... 6 Table 2. Summary of Bioassessment Scores, 2002 - 2005.....................................18 Table 3. Summary of Habitat Assessment Scores, 2002 - 2005............................19 Table 4. Streams in Upper Swift Creek Watershed with low pH............................ 19 Table 5. Sites at which fecal coliform densities were ?400 MPN/100m................20 Table 6. Streams with elevated nutrient concentrations, 2005...............................20 Table 7. Index of water quality categorical scores, 2002 - 2005. ..........................21 000297 60 Executive Summary This report presents the physical, chemical and biological water quality data collected by Chesterfield County's Office of Water Quality over the period of 2002 to 2005 focusing on the streams of the Upper Swift Creek Watershed. Over the past four years, 10 sites have been monitored and assessed in the Upper Swift Creek Watershed. Most recent biological assessments indicate that the majority of the streams investigated in the Upper Swift Creek Watershed are "Slightly Impaired." Declines in biological condition have been observed at Turkey Creek (B-002 and B-012), Tomahawk Creek (B-030) and Little Tomahawk Creek (B-OI0 and B-036). Bioassessment scores have improved at the Tributary to Swift Creek (B-O 11) over the past three years. Habitat assessments since 2002 have demonstrated that the majority of the streams investigated in the Upper Swift Creek Watershed possess either "Partially Supporting" or "Non-Supporting" habitat. The most heavily impacted stream is Little Tomahawk Creek. Improved habitat assessment scores have been observed at four sites since 2002 (B-O 11, B-028, B-034 and B-035). A comprehensive suite of chemical parameters has been collected since 2002 to provide a general water quality "snapshot" at the time the biological and habitat assessments are obtained. 0 For the past four years, instream measurements of dissolved oxygen, conductivity, total dissolved solids and temperature have been normal. Observations of pH have shown several streams to have values less than 6.0 units~ Fecal coliform densities observed in the tributaries of the Upper Swift Creek Watershed have largely been below the Virginia State one-time sampling standard of 400 MPN/I00ml. Most recent data (2005) indicates elevated phosphorus and nitrogen concentrations at six sites in the Upper Swift Creek Watershed (table 6). An index of water quality using the biological data, habitat assessment and select chemical parameters was used to provide for an overall evaluation .of stream health in the County~ In 2005, poor water quality was present at both the upper (B-OI0) and lower (B-036) portions of Little Tomahawk Creek. The best water quality has been consistently observed at the Otterdale Branch site for the past three years. In 2005, improvements were noted at the Tributary to Swift Creek (B-OI0) site. 61 000298 Introduction: This report presents the physical, chemical and biological water quality data collected by Chesterfield County's Office of Water Quality over the period 0[2002 to 2005 focusing on the streams of the Upper Swift Creek Watershed. As a component of Chesterfield County's VPD'ES Permit V A0088609, Watershed Assessment and Stream Protection (WASP) Program, investigations are conducted each spring throughout the County to assess the condition of its waters. Since this watershed-based approach to sampling began in 2002, sixty-three stream segments have been assessed. During this period, ten sites have been monitored and assessed in the Upper Swift Creek Watershed. Five of these sites have data for all four years while the others are represented by periods of one to three years. With the exception of sites B-035 and B- 036, all streams in the Upper Swift Creek Watersheds have been used, in conjunction with streams in the Middle and Lower Swift Creek Watersheds, to compile a reference condition to which streams throughout the county can be compared. These sites, as well as others in the program, were selected by a careful review of maps produced from the County's Geographic Information System~ At each site, biological and habitat assessments followed the guidelines outlined in the Environmental Protection Agency's Revised Rapid Bioassessment Protocol (EPA, 1999). Physical and chemical water quality was determined by in stream measurements and laboratory analyses of collected samples~ The aforementioned assessments and data have been used to produce an overall index of water quality for the streams of the watershed. Table 1. Locations and years for which data is available for sites in the Upper Swift Creek Watershed Site Number Stream Station Location Years Monitored bv OWQ B-002 Turkey Creek Upstream of Mount Hermon Road 2002 - 2004 B-O 1 0 Little Tomahawk Creek Across from JTCC @Charter Colony Parkway 2002 - 2005 8-011 Tributary to Swift Creek Downstream of Mount Hermon Road 2002 - 2005 B-O 12 Turkey Creek Downstream of Mosley Road 2002 - 2003 B-013 Blackman Creek End of Ledo Road 2002 8-028 Otterdale Branch At Clover Hill Athletic Complex 2002 - 2005 8-030 Tomahawk Creek Downstream of RR Crossing off Dry Bridge Road 2002 - 2005 8-034 Swift Creek Downstream of Otlerdale Road 2003 - 2005 8-035 Horsepen Creek Upstream of Otlerdale Road 2004 - 2005 8-036 Little Tomahawk Creek At Old Hundred Road 2004 - 2005 62 000299 IIt:11.....~~~~.=-- ~. " ~ r-: ~:J ~ · · ~ :.... .;,r i: ... ! ! .. :- "I .- I: L.I; . ~......~ I ...... .... .JI .. ~=:"lf2i ,'[.f; III~~~ .~ , ~ j "..~ -- --~ ~ --=-:- , . 'II '~i r LI. III . ~ ... ~' ~ .1. .. III" -.::.;-=<<: ... ~'... ...,r ~ It ~ i .. . I"W I~ I i "T · ~L. ~ ~ ---- ~ ~ . - .. 'rI ~::.. ~ ;~.I ~ lto."", ~ I ; ;-I :-!-iI=.: ~ it ~ ~ .... .: . . I ., i LJJIIIIIl Jifl t - ~ ':=:.1 ~ .. .~ ~ . ~ ..1" .....1 ~ ~ L..... ~, I .:ra.1 ,.' ~ p:j ~~ __11 ' ~..- ~,~, /' '_I =- !:I: -!:." ~ ':.: iii ~ _ I 'II........ " __ ~ r _'~ ~ ~ ~ p; 111 :~ ~~~~I'?, ~~ ~ ~ ~ , '8' _.-.; "!;' ,,- ~ ='".t..... ~.. · ~ ~~ ~ ~ I t ~ ~ ~ ill ~ ~ ~ h L"'~: ~L :~f. ,~ .~:t~''h:U :r:!9; · ,--- '- ,.., r ~'. ~ '~' ~ II ~ f:'It: ,1;L~: ~ ~ .iIB.;;; . . ;r-_~ ~;'f jI,;.,.;..... I - I ",yo: ~ ~ ) ~ ~ ~~~~ ~ ~ jL;~~:::; , r' '::.:~:!fA~~ t - ~ ~I ,_ ~," i-~ .._.... ~.. ;JL.. 'oJ TlIS l t ~ ) . \., ..... . . . . ~ . ..:w~ ~..'~ _ '!..Ill .~. -- -::- ....",_..~ ...., La..~ ~%'.~_: .~'~~t.R'"r-. .. 'If":..w;.,. F_. 1"1 ~ ~'2'-WII'"':: l ",n......i[~ '.~s..~;~~... '.L~"1.. :1::'\ o:.....~~::'=-~.~ .' ;:;- ~ ~ -.i. r. ~{.~~~"!. ~.. :i'": ._'f.::.::i: !"'W:.~ .. ... l,'-, .. ~.::. ~..~ 'r .:;t,I!If~ s. ~~ ... ..'~.:-:;' :!'t! ='r. ~ ...:). ~ il. \ p;o ~:::t'I iQ.;It, ..:.: n.l ') . . ~. -. .' ~ , -. ~ ~rA ~ >I': trri_ .., ~r-}l 'JI'... - -- I :'."( ,.,~: ~ ~;:'.L ... ~~ ';IiI,!:'-;. -.:.l::'f. r:n. ~ _L-..-.. _-:n:'" ..;.....c -: ':- ~... r .J::~ -:-:q: -';J;j Io::i:' ~"R ~ (~I if~ ~ "l-ii: ~ ~'.'~ ~ ~ ~.~ 'r.:-~ ,.... ~; ~":i_~~...~ ,.. '. ;'. _ '.1.. ~ ~'~ -' · ~...:!':" · "-:,; ~r d,:- ~,~ ~.,: ...~~'. :.. · · ~... · ~~I ~ ~.' . ... \.~ \.~~. '.. ~,~~ ... 'i< ~: t t= ~ ~ ~. · i:" ~..~' e I (.... -r~..~"::' ~1- ~ - .: '-.:, ....... ~':.., ~ ~: ~ ~~ ... i- -:: ':' ":'-.1 ': . _~ -:::-. ~ ~: '" .. _... 'r -:. ; ~ .~~ "1' ~.~~ ~~. .~"::.~ ...~-s.:' {;':..1;.~.\" .... -'F-r~ ;':;"0::{i.~'lI'~ 'fj..j; .:~:~ ~--.Ji:.~.:-;:.t-;.h/i:'= P.: '. - ~'; :::.: .:::. · · · '''''';' J.... '-. ":;'':. ~ ~ r'~'~ ~'- . ~ ~.. ~ r-'r7 ..:.- r: · · - -.; ~ "~',":fI:;:... '.:ti. -:~ ~ :. ~ ~ -:;.'" L'......,.-:... }.;.o.. · ..... ':-1- -... ..... .....". ~ ..... i.)..:;-..,. ~ - ~ #: .- ~ '.' · ~: .....: ..~ . J. ~ . :"I~ ..:. :: '':'' ~~........ ~. '-:',",= ~ Jr:.., ~ r ' .. . x--. \., : '$' iii' ~ · · ... .J,o _ ... · -. -~. ..... ~ y.. _ ...... . _ . .,:_1' . . _ _.... _ ~ .. : I. ,:,.. ,0 .... : ~. ii . FP .. -;... r ... "... .., -r .. . , ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ --:Ii ~, ~G a:::: ..a.:.":"I" ,.1;1 Gr~ ,- ~ ~. Q 1..:,. ~ ~ ,,,...... - . .. -, . .::I _' ...., ~.. -.;;; ;4.:.: II , '~ ! i If. ~~~ II tIiI::.. ......r... · _ T ~ :=-i ~. =.IE'" _ . ..,f4 ~ - ........... ...... J ...:J: ~ P:-". I .. , ~ --= -- :.. ~ =l i- :.: i-: ~.::.a:.. ... ?b .J ~ r ...... - -:,.rr. .:r. ~ ~ ~ .~.... _~ :t · - ~~.... ~: ~ .:.. L'" :~ :. t ,. II. ..)- -. ~ -: -Ii' .. ~...... ., I ~ "!l. - ......... ~ ;. . .~ .:; "I ~~ ...: ....IJ ~ .~ ~ to: :"!I r;I ...31:-: . . '-! ... iIIr.~ ... ......... I l1li2 "I' ........... :;:. III: 'I: __ ..:- r 7. ~ . .... - ...~ ~ ~... .. ....... 1:-"... ~ · - · ...~ i ;.: II .: ..... , ..' -,,:.;.. ~ ...1 "'" :",..:r.. ?:.~~.. .::1. I. '1~. ~ ..... ~~ III r...i:"-.il L E:.-r-:III ..,.. ~.. ~ =:.:. .. -:.:; .:....;... I~ ~ ~~ II... :lJ-. .... ... ...:.t~~ 1" ~ ....:.id.- -1 ! ~ ~ ..'~. _ ill r1 .!".. ~ ~.. ~ '1"1 ~,:. ......~..--:- · ~ ~ ~ ... iI:"""-" ~ ,.....-=. &:i ~ ~ ..... ..:.I.I)iIf.. .:~- r:.~ -...0. ~.. ---- .~ ~I: ~ .... w.:..... · -:.J.i.~ ".-:~ ~. I ~. · .- :I~ .- ~ ~ 1I ;a.r ~ - . .. ~ . ..:~ if r · '\j;:"': ;n " ~.. (". u.. "'--'- "II;:.F..iI ~ :g. I: .... '2 ,: . ~ ~ ~ I ~ r: /l!I ~w-. ::"Ii ..:.. -..:::. ~ I III ~: ~ ~ lEI -: i "':'II ..... ~ I I i , ~~ ~ ~ I .. ~ --: ...:.. ~ .. · r'- ~ ~I ..~~J I; .. .." I, ~~ ~I _"-i ;-I.~ t' .. ..-.: ~ ~ 1 UII , ~~~~~ ... · ~ 9"1 -...:. ~ -~":.-w ~~ ~ .... ~- .(,~. E. ., ~ :i. J .. ------.. Ii 1 ......,...\-" ~~ ;..~~, ~. . . ...... ~, ... :t W ".. ......... .. ~.f\..~;~1:.-:-" ~~ ~ I ) I ~ .. .. I. ..., . ill. :-: UI:-. . tII 11111 ~Ir H " ... ,I 91 ~ ~ "'J '.-. -.- 1 .. .-:~ -... -:: . l! ~i .". ~ t ... ~~ .. " "ill' ... ....... .. 'or ~ I~ -;.0' I II ,~~ ., · ~ .. III "'" - !JI= ~ ~ :.. ~II · II "li~t ~ ~ II ~. 01 ~ .. ... ::"" 1.1 II .. J.. -I, ~~ , ..... ... ..-.: ~'-=-rl~ .. --... ~ ... .. .... ... I"' ... - -:' -:~3 t.li! ~ ~~ .~~ .~ ~~-~~:~ ..._ ~J. ~~'-:~~~; .~i~~~~ Ji .a !":.., ~:-:. .... -:.rI..-:" .J:IIII ~~ .-.In?3l:'>> - _ ~ .:.~....,...~. - r- ;:.::~:: - . -= ... ~ .. · r __.. -.. :.p. .-. · .....,--.: li.M t! .. ~~.. · ............ -=- /l:'ZIfIII 'I! . ~ ..:. ~ -... ~ .... .. il"l ~~ .. ;r .. r ~ . ;,w .:R .. ~ ~ ~ t II 1 L~. .. I..: 1 ~ ~ :: :.-.~ I' ~... . II :, il!1 ~ ~-" ~ )~ ~ ~- I ~ ~ '~~:Q :il, ~~.:~ , '#P" -. :.:~ l.:~ ~ "'"'J~"" 1 ~~;;$ r~ ~-~~.;:.~~ ~U'>>~~~PJ ;.~~ O:~f_~~ ~ ~~~ ~1';.1iI .. ~ . ~--:-~ III ~....".~r~~... :1;;1 i.~.I~. .I~~ .,.. "IIJ~~..... ...{.-J ~I ~ , ~..... ~ A .r ~..~ ....... ~. ~ to "l1li ~ ~~ 1.1 ~ ~.. ..... --r :ii. .. ~~ ~.:(:t:~" -..r L l ~ J r..- or'" iKi it. ~ ,~.. ~ .111:.... :I~" -:. .:I.i...:-. -: · :j -:J ~ ~ :N-i~- 1.. . ~ - -.r:e~"'~ ~ ....--. ~ r-~,~}.~~:Ii~~~ ';".~~?:Jji!~L""l~!lPE).~~ --""1~~~~,. .....I\--&:~I~.I~-. ... :-I. II" :-r. :.:.... - E . Y.o::i.:..:.I -.=I ~ I........ fa. u.~""" ~rJ · ... -.. .",..~ .:.. ~ :- 0... -w...... ...~ ... rJ -:-. ......... _ .. ...- or. . · 0 ,jJ _.,. ."1. :-o"iil. ;,J -;'.IF' .......... .1'" ........ -I;t .... .- I -: . ....... -.:: ......... 0 ,: .-.PI . ~:.. :- ... , .. .. -... ,;.~.. . ..} .: .a,- ~ ~ -:..- L :.. !;~ ~ W. ~--... ..... ....-.- .. '..wi · ~ .., ...&..-. "I ~ I ~ -.-.. .h '!..... .... ;:~ ~~~ I:I~I .- .. "-: ~:i;.. 'iIL...~ -:: I (... .. . .....~ -.. .rp. · .J:.- .... ... I · ....:.-- ":1-. ;--:. :=,.. ~ -,...-.1 .-..: i ~ I: · .. ...........-:: ...- '- --- -- .:.. - . ~ --...... ... .. ~ ... ,~ f :~i_ ~ ir:.. Ii'. I:::.::: . I 1 I .,. ~ ...... ~ ... ... ---:,;: .. .......... - ~ i I" )I ~~ ~ ~ 2~~ ~ · .. ~ .:........2J!ii I :-...: ........ w .. I .. J ~ · -tii: II! 2l1....-l J :.~~:-. :;: - .... ~l 11:.. 1 r./. ~ ..IIi:I .. ~ I ..-'",j. .i~i.' :-....~: ~ =- I. -.. ');j I. . - i€- ~t.. - Q ...- ..1-'" I~ ~ .. ~ ~ ~. p-: ...; · . ":... .'J ~I .1.- ~~ ~~~ ~II .. .- · ... .-J i J 1 - ..: · =i- i5~1 F ,.,.~ ~ ~ ~ .-..._-: .. i :' ~ ~ ..~ ~ -. ~ .. -:...:L..=............ -:..! I~ ~ t":I :.: .: ~ ~ I 11~.~;~~r;;i_~~ ~- < "';~ " ~, .;o,r..l:.l~; ~;S ~~~ -...r'Mf:.... ~Ia i, ." q..Ji11 ; t :.:.,...i" ,-=. d~ ill. r .. -: I ., · ~, ~ I. ~. _ II ~ III .. ~.... ..... R .....;--:- ;', -:il: , .. J:.:i ~'.. -"'( !II"C:i --.:. I r iI ~ ..3i-. "Pi · ~ J.:II...... _.~ J r:. :-; , U --.;.. =a. ~::M; .. ~ _~ ... -..:: ..::.: I" ~ 11 ~.. I , "':'-::I:Di h,.3oii ";'1 ~ ~ . "':.E... _ ....~~I~ ~ :J "J~~ ~$.-:.~ ~. ~'~ ~ '.l1!~.. !!:~;. I ", ~r- .. ~:....,:--:."":'.. .. ...............1 ~:;S1.. -::.... I-=:I-~" --. I. ~.:J' p- J ~ ~ rY ....'...... ....,.-.::........ · ... ~ .. " :~,. :<<f. ~~~~t~~~~\~;'~J :.1'~:i'~,,:::;;~{ ,'"':): ;.},~ ~~r~~~%~.r';:~ ~ ",~~~7t(~~;'~' ~~.~ · ___ L." ..~~.... ........ II.. r-. --.g. . - - . 1..:...Jo1:oI 1 :-:-......::1 ...... ~.. -:----... - .. iii ~-.J.'11 ~. ~~ .!t.~ I!!IF ! [: .. . ...... --_. ~ ~ ~ ~Ij, ~ t', i a ... .. .. ~ .... . ... 11:1 :- -..J~ ~ ..... .. :-. .a.:. 1 ! ... I':" . ...~ Ii~~ ; ~ ~ ~.. ~ , :. .-.-.. ....... ~~ r I) --l1li I ... .. ~ r: ~;:; ::.. ~.... ... ::- [.: ~- ..:1 ~ ~ . ... :: 1.1::... !i! ..M;i . ~I ~; ~ [ ~ i ~ ~I~ " I, u ~ '.. ~ t iI ~;~ '.~ .. .. i Ii 5.! ..:.. .:-. ~ I :III( · ~ . ....... ... I!.I ~ :J]I ~ "'~L.-=i r. I riC f'" ~ II .... ~ ~~ "!.I · · ...... ~ it N :: ".1.1 \~ I 1- I~ ~ ~ ....k!~~" r .... ... ~:II ::r:- ~ ~I= 11'1-.. J ~ ~. 1 i!!::- ~ ~ \=--- ..-=,;" t: · _ z.. .. ..... -. ~....-" ~~ .~ ~ ~~ ' ~,; ~ ~ ~ ~ . 6"L"O -. ....... ...... -. ' ::;. ::-: - ,dI ...... f ~ ' ~ ~ ~_.:\, , 11.- I ~:--..:-=( ~ . ~ f.iQ.""" - ."10 I ... .:........ ~ .... ..:~,~ ..... ~- _.. · 1If-" - ~ :I -.. r:. r:-i. ~ ~\~ ~ r .:.-. ~..~ ~...I [:. ::-:.~.!.- ~ f J~~ · -:.-r ~........ =-:.. ~ c.;- ~ ~~:~ ~ Jt! - -.. ... ~ I ~ 1 :; ~:~ ~ 4..~ ~ .. ~. .... ~ ~ ~ . _...i r.:l ;r-.II:. -~:~.... ~ ''tI:- ...-....:.IJI Fit.. =..t.- iT - ..::;: L ';U!- ~.."'...I ..~. ~ I S1~~.. - ~~~.:t~~ · , ~ ~..~--=.~ :~. -:-:-:'I~~ :. ~~~:"~'.~~.:J.~).t.5~"--=-..~lI:~~ ~... :" ~~r..f' · r, ... , .J L ..+.. ~I .. ~:&"'~ . ~ ... .II rl. .-t: ....r:;. · ~ 6~ I. i! ... iK T ~::rz: -: " ~- r 1...:.a..V r--... ~ ~..:- ~ ",F"'-::~. ~ C. I .I)...... ~~. · ~ I:-..! .. -:Z. it. 1_" · ~ ~-I~.; Iii. it....}.. r (:;)... ~ .7. -:: - '...1 . ~:;r:- I....... ~ Ii.. . c:: I~t --= - r J.. ~ 'I: ~ .. ~~~... &:Y-I: ~ 1:1: ::il~.'::'-~ . ......~..,..~. ... · "~i.. · I~ ...1 ~:.;-~ r--':~~.".":i.~~----:.:~ _ ~ · · - ~ : ~ .. ..~. ... .... .. .. .rI../L- ... .. ... - ~ ~ i;- :.-: :.II If":'" ... - .. . ... .. I ... I ~ j.t~ ~ "./.'~: ~ -':::.. ~ ::: ,; 'j'.: _ '""f~ "':L:~:~': , :,II ~':'-"~ ,';.. , ,,'~ : ~ ' ~...~.-. ~t~' :;-:': . ,) =.-. I.: ,~ i'~ '!. ,',;')0 l,...r. ~ ~ ~~,~ Hr-:. lr='i' f, ~ J , .r:..,.,=1;t'P · -= -:-. ....::- ~ .. r ~ .. : .,;........ .:-1._ I. · ~ r: I .... . .. ~ - ....::!- ,/.........1' .. . ~ I a.( .. ....r . ... · rI- .. .. ..... · :. . ii.. ~............ --::- ~ .-"'-: {.. ' -! <... ..... ',1'''' -.:-to..-..=. · I. . .. r .... . . I... _ . .... _". ''r:.''''. .,:.. I. .......L.: ... 11-.,.... I .. . . .. "': . .... . _ ... ~ _ . . , · .......1.: .. ~;.i!.: I . .. · "... I · · -.;'T ~~ ~~ .- ... .. ... .... =- ~ . ... ~ I "J . IT I .. t. "I I ~... ~~E I""j · r. ~ !f 1:~ I." ~ . i....~~ ~ ~ ~~~~ ~ I I \!:Wf~ It I' ~ ~~~J~" ~I.~~ I ~~~;"%W~tE ~~ ~) l1li ~.RI:I .. QI:: f:. 'I" . "!"'I"."-.. IIIiiiW II. '~ m "lKIC::I !Ii: ~.~ ~r: ...- 1"'1" ... rJP'IIf.J .. iJ. II ~ t.- ..... I -'11" ~ =-J?:- ~ II ,... -........ ....... : /: -: ...ow:. ~ J: , ~ ~;. ~ ~ ' ~ .~ i~; j ~ ...I.....-.:.L ~ X t - ~.... ~ -II ~ 'h: ~ ~ r2! ~1 ~~ ~.I .IJ ~ .~"IV .... · .... .~:....., ..~ 1.1 .... ~.JIII.:.... ~: ..~ · . I · ----: ....... . ~ ill . ~ ~ J ~ fa. · I .. . ] . II 1....i: ~ ::. .. . J , It L.:. ~ )r ~~.. ~~ ;.'j ~I r .. :....1: ... =J · 1/ .r .. (:r:~ TJ-. ... .. . ~ .... .~:=- -. - ~.~ "'~j..r,~..... I'~~)~)~~ If .. i ~;.~, n I: .. "J ~ ~ ~ ~ - - - ......... , . 11:1"'1".: .:: ... Ii ~.~ -. , .-::; · . _ ........ It"'". .... -...... ..-..- .....,I~ ...... I ~_ ~. , ~_ '""2.:-;" , Q H-' , I". r~ ."',j'.' r ~ ~ ~::.j ~ ~~ ~~ L "I ~ -:. ~ ~ .... ..... ...... .... :..: ~ :i( I-! II ~ ii' '\" I . ~ ~ I' .. ., .... -..-. 1:1 ::. "II.. ~ "iL ",.:1 J.1 -:"ID.. Ir J: !I:~... 0:0'" ;1 ~ U ---. L [ "'IiI II .: a IIIIIi : ~ ( :-: .. , ~~ l I ~ .... :711.. .-:1 i~ ~ . ~ "I ~ ,. II j.I . .... ... .. - ..... ~ .. -. ~) ~~ ..; t I ~~ III ~ ... ~ ~t n ~:.I.~ ~ ~ .1'1 I. , ~ ~ .. ~ I: ~ ~ ,,~ :.I · ~ E ?!i _t.. ......... i : .rP..J:. ... -L.. . --;.... -~. ~ ':i"~ ~ ~ ~ ::: ~ . 'lit I · . :Ii s-.-: .. .. : hr~~ ~- . '"C. .. ..~~ ~~~ - ~. ri ~~ ~ ~.. :1":::= r. ' ~ ' ' :-;!:;:n ~ r..:. .Q, ~I:"" :'!.. I ~ L. __....... r · ~~ rr-.=.::......, · '''-; -r.....:I ~.- ~.. J ..: a ~.. J :"I. · ... ... 1 ~ ) ~:.::.:-r :!.:- 'l:1"~oI ~ ~ · . "'1 (.~rr:J ::6jlil r ~,. ~ =-::'~'.. .. =1 ~I~i'l1 ~ -.. ~ ~ .. ~~~1~r1r~"'.""_..~~""f1. ~:l .. ~:E .:.:J ~ .~ - ;.. ~ ~.-:oJ~ ~ ..=..,j __ r~ I~.... ~... · · ;,;)i. d .:.. ...,. ~] ~ ... ~ ~ ~. ...: .. -.: ;;; ...... .E.~I :~ · ~ ~... ~:..:~. ...,.. ..... - .. . , L:" ~ .. h":"I :I ~:.. ~~., . . LI . ...... _ .. .. 1 · Q.. ~ - , - .... . ......... ... I: , ..... .... - -._ . _ ~ I . .~ :;.r... ~ ~ ,~_....... .. ..... _ 1.11 -""= =ill ~I .:I ~ .... _ :'i t -;.;. · ... ,Ii =::'J: ~~ \- :)1,;.'....., '- ~ ~ ....'. ":.. ""]~I~ _ ~ ~ ~i':l ~i,.J-' :.J. ':;I~.. ,~' '~.f ? ~ :-~L~ *: 1 ~ ~I ~~'"~. ~....... ~ ~~ Ilra..~ =-..~-M;IIi:~1 ~~ ~-, ~I';::J n~-=1I1 JI;I!i~":: r. ~.,j .~~......~ ... W=.r=J.':' ..., .. ~ ~ Hj..,;...."";...~ J~ )~~~, .... .:..1..... 'j.,,: ~~~ ~"".:J~JJ · ~= . '~-:~I:;-;;~ .:t- ~-:.. J. rA"Yi -'I.e'i S 1).1 ...~. ~nr...~ 1;::.1 ........ ..~. -..a=i~-~~ I' f1~1 , _ ~~ r. ~... · ... · ~.... _ ~-=;.~~ ~.~..~ ~~ Ii-~' ~ .~: ,1;"-!~u.;::~~ 'i.' / ' ,:II......... ~~ , ~, ":~...:..: r _':" Vl~ ,_~', ,.-:.r ,~'i~. · · · ,~~. ... .. -. ~ I' ..:..;" I. k".. .=..=III. I . · '- .. ~. ~ ...... . ~r...- r:" - . p:""" If........ -.:. .. EI I" =-=->: ..:". : I t ..J- ..: ~ ...,.r/..:... ~ } . a:r ifI · J~ .1 -:-...71:" ~ .t ~ i. .. ~.. · ~ It'""'" .... I~ . ~::..... .... :"'-III.:-...~ ~ ..' :::i :... ~~ "Iif :..1"-.. :....... - ::'11-' ...Pi. ~ .r:~. :.!.:. ...: .. -=;., .... : .1 I! ~~ · -L... ~ :II.... ~__ .. - . - .. - - ~ II Ii tI . iI ~~ ~ ~ .. ~ -.. . ~, ~ .-.;:.. - ~R 1m ~ 'L ! I II:J"L .. . ~ ~ ... - - -- - Ir . - r: -"C.-.-- I .i .. t :..~ I; :r:. _..r ~ ~I f I' . ~{~. ~~ II/~~ ~ I · I--..~.,."....:-I . :{r-... ..... . tl. r~. ~~.. ~ ., )' .. I.. Ii ,~~ 1.~' rl:.,1. .... \ I - ,. J :~" :s:'I (:: -i~:.:. ., Ii I ~ ~iA" :< I ~:-.:.. ~ J . ~ -.... .... . :- ~ ...... :.: ~~:~ :.. T-:.....;::. ~ j ~ II: ~~,::j:I ~ :---. 1. .... "\.':-r:: - ..:.. ~ ~r.;. ".-:1 ~: ,. ; , ~ii ',~. _ ~ J .... ~':....... ~ ~ t'". ~ ~ I ........... ~ =-?! ,.. -- ~ I ... I · I ~ ~ M ... ~.. ~ ~ -- ~ ~ :.:.: ~ ~ ~ . ~."'!'"I ."1 ... _ .... ...;.. · · .II .. . ....... .-II · ~ I '" 1J" .::111' .. ... .:::v: ~ I~....... ~ iIi ~ ...... ~ ~ ~', (-E II :.:. I'r 1 - - n ~ ....:...c: .nor ...... ~... ~ "--" ..1 ~.,! .. .... --= r, ..... - .... .. ,....... 1"1 ....... .. "I .... .... " .... .J 'IIi: -:III ... ..... ,..--......... -_"I -....... .... ~ ... . .. ..... ~fI. Iii. =--n - :II ~ r"'I .. ..... '," . ~ ~ W:"". ....-., ~i1jJ. ~ ........... 5I'jIII'" ... ~ ... -.... 'I:: ~ ~ ....-..-:::.... ~~ .-=I=-- ...... ~ ... fJ...-:r ~ ~ ftPL. · . , ~ ~~:~~~ ~ ~.~ JJ~ .....-.-......~~iJ ,~~ ~;6a .- · ~ .":11": ~ - I, H) "('W · · i~~..1 . + · ~~ "-:-:3...: ~~ '... ~ .... J Ii:: t ~ ; ~ ~ ~, . - ~. I ~ ~ ~li . . ~ lI"f ~ . -:... ~ t ~k ...~.. , I~~'~ .. ...~t ~~ .,,~. ~ :. I . ......... .., · :w -,.. I ~ 1,E~ ;..-c ~~ :'.:iI ~. · A "Il ~....:--::'.... ~. r:.w .-=...-::,.. . -#J .~..-L ~ J .. . I ........ - ....::. .~ ~ ~ Q ~ ~ ,il~~... _ q~ * ~I,.h~ ...1-:. t~~ _~. .--:; ~ I" I -I · ~ r~ ~~.; --- ~ .~! '. ~ ~~~... ~., \-= (. ~ ~ tj;., ....- i ... ~ ............ ..... J ,~ · f 1M ~~ I ~.:= -i rl "::r ~L ~ _~ ..: l.~r.::!I · '1 .. w. ~~:..I :, . ,:-~ , E -.... - .. ~... :. ~ ~.... I . ~ I I II IU I r I :- .. 02'1 .~ ~ .. - liI~ /...j ~ ~ ' ~ -.. ::I :.":I. -:.- ill .. -..___ ~ II:L... , ~ ~ )~~ i :~ - ~ ,'I ~...~ ~J:j I l . ~ ~ ~ I .~ ~c _. ":"""L J.!iI rd~~ · · ~""~:1 .) ............J ~ },!l ~ I~ ;J{j~ 0:0,,' ~... ... ,~ ~ ~>.) ~ I · ~ p!... ,. ~ r .lCrK. · ~ .. -,::a","" _~ :!i- ~~ --.-... .. ~ro · --1:.i ~ ~ .. ~ ..,Jj ~ . -..,:.- - .- .( ~'A. (I v.. J ,.::..-.,1 ~~ y. .... ~.. .O._~"'nto: ~ ~ -r r:.:-- .. -..;ij ~ ~ ..........,. .... _ .... _ ..: 'rI' "':'". .. _... T I,~ =.1:-. -:..,..-,.. .-.n. - ..... I. -r'-'" ~. B-Oll Trib to Swift Creek 0.081 0.057 B-028 Otterdale Branch 0.055 0.037 0.05 B-030 Tomahawk Creek 0.035 0.04 0.25 B-034 Swift Creek 0.054 0.046 B-035 Horsepen Creek 0.058 0.03 0.03 Typically, total suspended solids measurements at the time of sampling within the Upper Swift Creek Watershed have been less than 20 mg/L. The greatest total suspended solids concentrations observed have occurred at the upper Little Tomahawk Creek site (19.0 mg/L, 2005), Tomahawk Creek (25 mg/L, 2004) and the Tributary to Swift Creek (26 mg/L, 2004). Since 2002, the majority of Biological Oxygen Demand determinations have been less than 3.0 mgIL. The greatest BOD value recorded in the Upper Swift Creek Watershed has been 13.8 mg/l and occurred at the upper Little Tomahawk Creek site (B-OIO) in 2005. Hardness measurements during the past four years have indicated soft water (<85 mgIL as CaC03) throughout the Upper Swift Creek Watershed. 'An.index of water quality using the biological data, habitat assessment and select chemical parameters was developed to provide for an overall evaluation of stream health in the County. The chemical parameters used were those that possessed a Virginia State Water Quality Standard (PH, Dissolved Oxygen and Fecal Coliform). The index generated a numerical score that corresponded to a level of quality for the stream segment. The results of the analysis are outlined in table 7 and are reflective of all monitored streams in the watershed for the period of 2002 to 2005. A map depicting the most recent assessments is presented on the following page (Map 2). In 2005, poor water quality was present at both the upper (B-OIO) and lower (B- 036) portions of Little Tomahawk Creek. While chemical water quality was relatively good at these sites, "Severely Impaired" biological communities combined with "Non-Supporting" habitats were the reasons for the assessment. The upper (B-OI2) and lower (B-002) reaches of Turkey Creek also were evaluated as having poor water quality in 2004 and 2003 respectively. Once again, biology and habitat were the deciding factors. The best water quality has consistently been observed at the Otterdale Branch site for the past three years. In 2005, improvements were noted at the Tributary to Swift Creek (B-OIO) site. 77 00031.4 .:;.~~ III ~ ..:. ~J - ----- .... .......:.. I ~ .....&.... . .. , ~-:-_~:I JIII!l ~ ::..~n . -. . . a-6:':' ~ e.., ,~e JJ ~ ~ ~, ~ 1 .. J!.:;. . .. --. -.: T " ~ ~_... ~~.. .. .. '1-. .b~~.~ 1 ~I ~:..:.. .......~ 1" E ~ .i-~~ if.:~~ iii D i ~ .. . 0'11:' rl ~.i~ tI' r .-.;r ...,.. ~ J · it ~ ,JI ~~ .,.. -rti I ... l.r. ... ~ . - -,." ~ ----- ~. ..... ~ _I . I I..:.i: ~ · ~I ~..:!I':.....I ~ I ~..irIII~." ~ t.:~~-F:lr!~.~ ~;:=-~t .. I.AI..~':': . ~ · . ~ .'~ . - ~~~ i ~..~ -- c-.......?.. ~~~~~ :...._71. I~~~ , ~ -.... _.. . _:. ~~ _ ---~ ~ ~ ..(~Ti~ :--: " I.: IJ ~:I ,- ,~~LI"'. ~I.E"""... ): ~~~~: ~ ~ . ill ~ p · , ~ 1/ II:: .... J ..... ~"'%I....... -: .. -:. -1"=.. ~ q 1""1:-.":1: ~ . ~.:.. ~ iiI' :.-. i ~ III .:,r ..:, 't ~ ~--:- ~ ~ ~~ :J;i.!1-"~ It fJf'" ,.'I ~ ~.. .:. ~ : ~ II~; ~ ::':1-.', ~.~ I! ~~ ~ ~~~~ ~1 ., ~ ~ ~~i.Z;;;~ ~~ ~ ~,~ 'I~ 1 ~ '~_. hi . . )'"' f _ t!'J" _ Lr:-:Ii ,~ -.i ~ ~ I'!I ~'.,; ~ -, . ~ " ~ ~ I I 'iii! ' r. ~ ::; ~ r ~ ~ '...... ' ~ .. ~ ,~ or.. ~.::.. ;;;;: u - "~;:: -:-- L ...: ~ $ ~;.. , ." ~ ,-..: :-I. r~ ~ Ii ~ tI -.r-::. -. ~ . ~ . ~, II · v:".-...J , ~. ... . II' ...!..I..... J~~ "II · t.t;D ~....... :::. ......... ~ I...~ ~ I~ ... ~ m~ I"" "':'~J ....... ~ i-:i · ... :--.:; ~ /I.. n ' -:: II · . ~ :I:-" I ~ , -'II ~.. I. 1""1:1 LJ::' · .ri- .- . ~ Ii; ~ ~..:w ~. ..~.0~ ..,;.,1. ...~~ -:- - ~ ~ ~~... - -~.~.a-~" · . ~ i ~~ ..1 :... .... · -:...JIIR..Jo" _ 1 f51:"': -=..:II.... .. . ; ~II: ~ IIIi.iI! (I - ~ ~ . ~.r: ~::":I.:L ( ~ ..s:-=,.~' ..... -~ ~. '---...... ... .~: I. - .... i.. ~ ~i1, - ~,I;.~' ',~ '" · "~j:Ii -1,:' ...;r.... rt7' J.::... ':;"" r ~!:"" ~ ,c. .~ ~ ~ - ~ ',j? ,.r' ~~ , ~ rJ ~ ' '. E"~ ~ '~Ii:."'.r: ;.,t;-'I ~ I · I"' 01- ,I ~ ~~X ~ 4~ ;;;: ~ ....,' ~~:c.;:::'~'L ~,j~ '~J. ~ tJ ~~11~i'l ~,~ ~ ~,J~. E", ;,. " I ? _~~' I ~ 1 ~ II ' .. Jt.... _ ,. __ ~ t;;i _ ~ ~...... .....)l P 1III:..:I.:-.r.III I.. 11-.. . ..' ~~ .~ _:;.:... ~E ~ ~ ;1"'. I 1 ...... ii: .::I ~~. ~ ~~ ~~ Y!I ~ ~.~ ~J It ~... -:-~;:: _~. J5PiI:I -.:: <M';':': ' . :-; =:::':J iii J r:.: -;.. ...., "'~ .. :.:. !I~ _~ ..:.J ~I ~ .. W ~ - .:-.~ v:- :.. II ;~ ~ ~"'I. ~ r ~~ ..., C III: .~ ~.-=I: v~ :.. ~L 1'- ~ ~ ~ ..1 ~ · !II~- ... -.:. .. "i. ! .~. ... ~ .,.:- --- ..3_..... W II =Ii.......:. . · -==--.. ... - - ..-,..n:. r"III"II ~. 01. ~."-:-.II ..:: ~: · ':.. IW iLl ..... r I ~~ .. -:- ~ - .. . · ~ r}.r:. -r ':':":1' ,] ,~.... I:n.... o.:i. ~ -I ~ iE. - ,~i:i.. r ~ if: ~.'!,; ti ' , ~ :.i!":.4 ..... - - : .~ ~ -.u Ii ~ I ~~~~~~V'~~~~-::",' h~~ .v.,-d.~. -:..- ',....!Ii....k -.....~~_.. .~~ ~II.: .vfr.. ~~~~~~. .:"~;~b~~ ... Ii-' I. · · ~ .II 0~ I ., - t =l: · · ~ ~.I .~..; · · - r..k. IS ...::! ":".!1~1 . · ..-: ~ I:'" . r.. .~: ~ ~ .. j I .~ ~.. -..:. L: 11 r 1- , ~ ..'~ -=... .. '::i .. ~ ~ .......:.. · ~ :: ~I ~ ., -: Ii ~ ( ~ 'Y-i:. ~ ...-.-. :.:: ,'. ., :1 ~ h:: . I :;... .... '.. -- ~ - ~ ' uS' ~ ~...,'JI:U' " - 'r" .~ ~ ~ fr. ';, ( ,~~:.. :.r ~ ~ ~ ;::;;{': , ~:.~'i#Ii;t:A; -..'....... .~ ~ ~ ~~~t=:=:..~~,%~~~~ ~.. .J~!."";..:.!:"", :....~j''.f~/'~~..,c:t:,.....,.iI:i-": ...'....~..,~,::\I"~~.~i;'~':-~)- ~ rj.~~1l~ ,L~~ ~51 ;..:f, ~ ~ ~"'= L - ... T.-;;:..... ~. ~.;:,.; 'I. ' ' ~ '1' ~' ~,~.~ ~ .., tj ,-, ?-'..4-:'" --.: !I,':"5 ~;:..:.... ~::........ I '..........=:- ~'" r.. :~ ~~;~:lt..~1' 'i.-!.d::... h ~.1-:;!;I :.-:"~~:_ ~'- ~~~-'~ ../ ,i%''''~1--=-......:~~~-:.;.-.J. ~..::w~-=f,,(i: '~~~~ '-~ ~ ",) :.. ~~ ... ~...5 ~.. ~ ',.;;i:. [ W _L;:.': .. ". ~ ~'i':i,_~~ iM:::-!::: ~ ~ ik."~1.. ;;: "1- "-=?I ~. ~ ~ .:!.:..~ ~ .: ::"_t :.: -::.'L ~::-'.1 t ....""i ..:.,:,~,tr~~.b::''''):~~! ..-:'J'" .~~'<.,... .. 'r .....: ,::'t-~"':""'3I!!.':F,:~J:I. ~1~~~r..:i1. · ~":~;-:~~.~..-i. ) -~ii~~ ~ ): -:h.:.~...~ :.-r: ~~... ... ,....:J.:~I..:-!I...:....,..::t~.._.. ~:... ~I ~~.i-J n..:-. - ~ ~..iI!t ~ ....... · .1::-..- · :"" ',x. ~ -;':-L ~ ' )~ 1- ~ ~ ','L\... ~) ..;.. ~,.,. ~~ ;" ".".i:. ~i':JJ. ... Pft:~'I,... ~ ~~ ':' ~ r ~"-::I ~I -' ~~, (., . _-'l.....j~,t~t e ,.;....;-1 r:-.;: , .... ~ L.. ' ~' -:. .rJri:" '...::-=; ~.;:... '~ -I 6:.. ~ ~ ... .11...'1: "'i 1.:'~"":e:''''-~.. ~~ ~ ~'~ 4:l' ~1t 1.:1. '~~. : J~ :.:- ';.. fr i;r ?...:~ ~:..~ 'l~.: ~..""" ~ ~T...:.. ~:'" =:;; ~.L"j.;' L ~ '1Jt( ~,v:'/ i :{ s.~" L!~.I,:, ..;:'?-} t~ .;.,,:.:~. "~):::Lt~ "'~' ,...., -: .~f'il l .ik..."1i JJ....% ~..(I:ItI:...- ~{ ~ -1j"':l · .~~. - .~"'If-.. ~~~~~ ~I ~ · ""1 ;- M. ~.. ' · ...v-.... · .tj.. .....J q; 1 · · · - · ....-...: ... ... · · "'-::-'.J . ... - :- =--. .:.... . .. · .. i ~ -:... i.. .... i"" ....... {!- 1-:- .., I .... ....-.. ..... ~....... :I ,'=:"'.t I .. ~ I......... _ · 1 .... jt. : l..-r ..... "':II"W't · r/' · _..: I I.... ......~........ ... II · ... ... -:.. .....I.:: ,. r. .. ":.I · I .. ....... · .. r ..... ... -+...... ___ - . I · _ ;:..... "_I~. r _ . I...... "'f:... .... _ · · .. Map 2. Most recent water quality assessments of WASP monitoring sites in the Upper Swift Creek Watershed' 79 00031.6 ( \ f \ Stream Classification D Vary Good ~ Good ITlI3 Fair _ Poor \ ~ /---./ .J -~ L. _ '....l.I~re.h9d BOI.!f~-dHi Chesterfield County Stream Assessment N 2005 ~ Swift Creek 80 00031.7 References: Barbour, M.L., J. Gerritsen, B.D. Snyder and J.B Stribling. 1999. Rapid Bioassessment Protocols for Use in Streams and Wadeable Rivers: Periphyton, Benthic Macroinvertebrates and Fish, Second Edition. EPA 841-B-99-002. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency; Office of Water; Washington, D.C. CH2M Hill, 2000. Chesterfield County VPDES Permit Implementation; 1999 Annual Bioassessment Report. Annual Report to Chesterfield County, Virginia. Chesterfield County Office of Water Quality, 2005. 2004 Assessment of the Biology, Habitat and Chemistry of Select Streams and Watersheds of Chesterfield County, Virginia. Chesterfield County, Virginia. Chesterfield County Office of Water Quality, 2004. 2002-2003 Assessment of the Biology, Habitat and Chemistry of Select Streams and Watersheds of Chesterfield County, Virginia. Chesterfield County, Virginia. Chesterfield County Office of Water Quality, 2002. Chesterfield County Water Quality Section Field and Laboratory Instrument Standard Operating Procedures. Chesterfield County, Virginia. V ADEQ, 2004. Water Quality Standards 9 VAC 25-260-5 Virginia Water Quality Standards. Virginia Department of Environmental Quality, Richmond, Virginia. 81 00031.8 Blank page 82 000319 .~,. Pi. ._~~ ...~I. .. J .,. ....... ':J'" '" I ~ 1 .. I ~ '.M . .. · ...~. ~ 11'1 ~ ~I~ ;..;: n: ~~ r1:::: vi. I ::..::.! r:~ ~ ~f ~ .~l"!l ! ~,~ ~.~ I 1CHS.1=i( . ~.... . ~ ~ 0I;;;i ... _"IV ... ~ ~ ~ ~~ ! ~1~ ~ ~ ~~;J ~ .. -:: J..L~..:.:t 1 ......... .. ]I _. ~ ~ :-.I ~ ~ ~...t!. ~:-:::'Ilf - I!: "-: ~.. ........ P:"- I ~"..I';'rI ;..':J 1111 I~I" ~.r~ Ii...I ... ~!i'l ~ .:>11'1" '~ ~ I~~.~ ~.r:-:.l'" ......, ."T ~ 1.1.:.... --:1 i ........ . r-...-.r "L ~~~~ I(~,,:,: . I' ~.. .. .~ rr=' · :P- d'l. . III ... .,d ~ I - .. ... II iSi -I~~- .~~ ~ ~I~" ,- ~ ~~' I ,- ik.: : T ~ ._ :- _ ~ of "I ,~~ '~~:'J~ ~ - ~ ~~ ~i. II . U ~ ~ ....=~ iI\~ ~ · ~~ ~ ~ .:-I i:I .... -=..: ~' ~4~: ~.J ~..... I=- ~ II:!: .... .- i .... · '. ~ ~ y~~.l:''' " iJ~~~r;.~~k~ ~. ~.-: ~fIi'" '-I:~ IJ ~ :&. · : ..... v:" -:;..:: ... ~;.. .J!.. :--.. .. I. -=it "t: II- -: .- 1 .. ;c-: ~ II · ,."'s zY :-:-:1 .. , ~ ...~.... . .... :. .... ::::..~ ..I. ... ~ l',:,- ' '~: :~:'.i:~ ,;",':: ,~ ~ ~ 5 -~ ~ ,pi, ;.&.. ., 'II: 1 I ..., ~.~ I .. '... ~. ~ ~::...:-tt.,,~ ~.} .:~: ~ ~'L: " ~ .~~':~ ~ ~ .. ' ,:~ ~~~"~~~"~~::~~:"1 ~~.. ~, . . . I. )II'" ...~. ., ~..- , .. ... . .. . -. .... 1'. ~. - ~ ....... J.: '. .... ,. I I : r :' ~ _ ~ ."111 .. 'Ir .. .~~-~. hj'!:'~ ~~"I'~u~,~~t.-J:'i'~' ~ .~~~~ ~ ~ I{": _,.. " .-I~ J Ill) ~ ~ · i- .... _ :-: ........ II ~ ~:"i~. · ,-. .~...! .. ~~...i--:J -. =-........ r- . --=I ~ _ ..: - II' ....... I Pi. _ 17"....... .y ~ ~ ~ ~ .')aII ~J1 ~::..t1 ill · - ~ ~.~ t . ~~ .. I,.. -.. ~ · .: _ . . .:... ill : IIJI.. ' ~..~~. i1 ..y.. -'J.: ~ - -- .... r.-: T):Q..:., · I. : :J 1 ~. I. I:. ~ ..... OJ 1 · ~....... -r: ~.". ~ r.:. I ~"'-: r ... I ..-. II~ ~ ..~ .... . ..I L .J ... .... . i: U ..II!I:.::- ~ ::-.. ...... · II - "-: :,.It to: Iii... .1: .11.:. ... . ~ '-' . ~. .... ~ .. I!I ~~- ~.~ ...: iii ~ I . . ::!i ... ~ _ L ~ ......~ oJ ~:::....~~ . "';-:-1 .:.. ~I ~ p.. "II"'i-I t ;JI...II! L 1ft.. -....... 1 lIII r -:. ~ · n ..... ~ ~:. =-=- L' .......- V ~ \i.,jJ .. ~ ~ f .!J~ ;,~ ~ "I~ -~ .. ~ ~ ~ ~ ....,. ..... ~ ~ I If III ... ... · ~ · =-.... ... =-:i" ':1... .. .. - ..~ r. 01 .r: .. .... _.. ..... I .:-- 1 r..l I(. ~ ~ .,. l1li . I:. Ii;:. ... ~ ., P!I.' ill -. . U ":a I -.:.. III.. ~ ~iI~. .1'"' M~ p =:='.. ~ :~ 'r 11.~ ~ ~ ;. ~ Lr ..;.: J~ ...,.. r .. .. .J j; ~ ~ 1 . · . ~., ~ · Pa:;;E~ ..... .. a.. ~ . ~ ~J :..... .. · . ':I .-...E. · ..... _ ' pi - ............ :-- 1 ... ~1 ...... ~ ~ ~ .. !:I . .. . ~ ~ ~. ..~.t~ L1 -li:-] ~ ~::--... ~ :t'Ii.:.'s.- ~.{~:'~ i1 ~ t..~ ~:! .~ ~ ~- ... ' b ".~-~.~.M~~~ · ~ :-:~. "~~r::- 1.1 :-)~I · 1::5 .x - ,.. iIiI! -. to. "". · ~~. ~~. ...... r. ., ~~'IIi~ ~... I ~.... ., 1 ... i:s =:-., ;t~ :~~ ~ .~ ,,f~~ ~~...~~~~ ,~.J: .....;: .-~ .A.~ -1 I P~~~"':"I: ~.. ~ ~ ' ~~~:3.~~-' ~.,if;,~~~~~~.iI ~ te. ~ t( 9' ~ ,,U ~ ~ /f.f{ t-' !. ~,~:jl"'~ :.Ii'! I.... /'] ill ~ . L:.~' .'_. M"i ~ I." ::.1 · J !!tJI .. .... ....., ~.,'" "1"1"1 . r ... . I.&. r-_ - .:= --. ,.. 'Ii < 1 I' ... ....... - IV ~ :!.I... !) ,Eli' I~ ~u.. ~ L ::! . ~-; ~ I!!I"...... ~ I!.. .. ::'I" :1!. 'E.&I' ~ .. I .",.~ ...~-5 .-.. ~ ..!j - !i -.,.... _ .r ~. '~~ _ ____. I .... ~ :11- .~ ~ -=;---=-~.-~ ~ :~ i ~... _.~ . ....:;~ r.. !!I:r~ ~ ,~ ~ r: i ~ "I iJ ~,~ t;~! ~ - .:.. .......,. ~I ~~...z.:~.s" ~ .... __ ... .II :'"11:::111 ... ~~ .~. ~~r~ ~ ~ ~ :.. ~t~/~~~~yl · ~r~'~, W ~j ~~L.)~ ~.~I -."-.. ..'!I!tbjf~~~~~~ .~.. ..: -~~ . -:-. ~ .~~~~....::: ~ ;~: · ..'1"V~~ ~- .:..:! ~ t .~~=J;""r:r. ~ ...1.... · M 1I!i-r:" ~ ~.I ~ Ii- m. · :..i.: ~. i.... -.-.,1:.1.. I -... .: .I~~ ~.... ..~....It~....~~ t'":1." - ..:a. "'_"ll .......... .'::4. ~ ~ .. ::.-:\.- I ... r ..: t ... ---=... ~ .: "IW ", ... .... ..:i-:-.... ~ ~. ",... .....~ .:~ I ~ -:II r · .. .........-..;; ~ · .. "I'p .... .. · --.-- - · - ~ :.;t. · · ~ · .. ..' · . -..... 1 .. I ~.. .. ...-1:1.... I. :-::.- ~ ~.. · · - - ~:. ...... ".1"'1""1' J-. · "1' · :-.:.. · L*:~~:[:~, -~" f- "'~',~ .~~ '''~~_i~,4~~{5~:'~~ ' .. r.- ,.. ,.., cl~t '- ,/~~:~~ '~~)~~~hh.~~~~t.i; " ~:" \ ~~ ,J:. ~.:1 _,s ..- ......~ I ~. I..... _ _ .,., t.. =- ~ .... --.-..--.;.1 1-' - . .,.... ., I.. ~ .:-.r ...~:-....... III ----: n' ~ .. ....- ..... ~ -...:.... -....1.. .. -;,... ... r - · I .... - ... .: IIII.LIIII .- .1 I" ~ 'II'" ,J~ - II ,.. ., .... ... -- ..... .....;. = Po ==- ... ~I ~-.. :I:; r" 01 .... ....::. L..IoI __, -= ~~ 'L .:t ~ ;r. 1 ........... ~ ~oi=-- ...= , Wi _;.. Ii.. 'I ,~~,p=:{.r ~~ :.:.... · . ...1,)): ~~!:.~~. ~~ji~~i .. ~:J~~~,h ~.~~N ~~~~ . ~ ,..-~-- ~.. ..::i ~ "'1 :.: -: ~ rIJ" }~I", -.. ~~'-;;o;~,:, ~:r:" ~~i.' -.: ~}~;'=:1 ~! , ~. .~ ~....~ . .. ~ · · ~,:. 11(' .. 'II.E. :...- · . ..~ .. ... "i ~ --: ..- zr ....;.. ::, >- -::: './...-.:, J 'J ~:oc; 1:; ~-' .L 1"'1!:!I.'" ...... ...., I~ ~ .. ;~I ~ :~:. ...-...... ...-.'.. -: . ,. 4 II . ~ . ~I~ ~ , ,~~.~?!: . 1.1,,_ ~~" L. ..... .. ~~ : ..::I ... . ~~~ ~ .. ,t/t: ~ i ~ &L. ~~/I I 7'" ~.. '~r~ t "i~ ~ ~ Iii; 7 .~ ~_~ ~~~~~ ~ ~(. ~ I~ ~" . - ':;;II?I ,-. ~~.: ~ ~ II ,~ I_II ~ ~~!~i' ' i~ II, ~ ~ ~Hl ...~~-S11 ~r-{. . ~l ~..~'~~ · Pi 1Jt~ ~ .. -, ~ 111C ..... -.~n.'" ... . --- .~ 'I .. ] ~ ~ J.~.::-": .~ I~ r... ~.. '.::. ~~ I:. .. · ,~. · ... I.: 1.1 II:J PI -:- ....-c--:-.. . ~ 11.' ... .. iI !..:-:: ~ L;.. _ 1lI"'. L' ttZ ..".., . ~"] .. 1=1.' ~ .:.:.~. ~ .II ~ ....~ II: r.u ri 1 ~ .....~. .... .I~ ~ ..-:: ~ ~... I ...., to;." , /I' fI 'Ii Z r." ~ ... 'f I- - 12' iY"'I'.. _ " ,1'1/: ....... ... ~ rr:J;)~ :~,!::~'f ~~~~~"'~"i" ~ u 'L ~~~'=-~~ ~.!L; .' ~ i ~_~~ - ~R :'~~~ ~ a;[-&::II-. '~:o:~~_...... - J: T....~.=. · - ~ ~~ ~ .....Ii; (;: ~ I ~ -.: -~-J::i I~" -:. · ... . ~."':I ~ "!J r ~-,.. 'fa ~~~..!..... ~ ~ .......... S:~, -"':~~.. ~-:~'/; ..'( , ~:,......-, '1" ~': 1 ~r:;;:~ ":~~.CI~~"'~~): ~~l1i " ' ' J;-,;_, ~ r. ~........ : (:1:.'::' ~..:. r: .r..Jy ~ rJj 't.. ...,...-::. _ ...... I ... ~ _ _ It is important to keep in mind that the report above only analyzes 321 acres of riparian buffers which accounts for only six percent of land cover in the Swift Creek sub-watershed of the Upper Swift Creek Watershed. Even with the small amount of coverage this report shows the potential savings, both economically and ecologically, are enormous~ Land Cover Change Analysis: CITY green also allows users to analyze potential future changes in land cover~ The user can specify land coverage percentages and the program will report changes in water and air quality as well as economic values. For example, the county may be considering new developments or agriculture expansion in the Upper Swift Creek area that affect land cover. The program then allows us to determine the impacts of the development by changing the percentage of land cover. Therefore, based upon the prior percentages in figure 4, we shifted the land cover percentages to make crop lands account for 26%, decreased the tree cover to 330/0, and increased open space or grass cover to 30% to create a hypothetical situation if development occurred. In turn, the land cover changes allow us to see the impact on water and air quality. The results were impressive. With the decrease in tree cover from 82% to 33%, the stormwater savings decreased from $4.5 million infigure 2 to $2 million (see figure 7). Figure 7. - Stormwater Example - The report shows the significant loss of water quality due to a decrease in tree cover. Stormwater Air Pollution Removal l.Vearest Air Quality Refer'ence Ciry: 'Vashingtou DC Lbs, Removed'\/)" Dollar Value em'bOll .l,,!ono)..-ide: O::one: .Nitrogen Dioxide: Pm#clllare .lylatter: SulfiJl' DioJ.lde: 472 3.679 1.887 3.113 1509 5201 $11,304 $5.797 $6.386 $1.133 I21ah:. Carbon Stors!!e and Seauestration 10,661 $24~821 Total Tons Stored: Total Tons Sequestered (Annually): 4,554.28 35.46 Figure 8. - Analysis shows a significant loss of air pollution removal. Although these numbers are remarkable they do not tell the whole story. The CITY green program that creates these reports is formatted for general land covers, not riparian areas. Therefore, it likely that riparian land covers have a more drastic impact on water quality than the CITY green software indicates. Besides pollution removal riparian forests also serve to maintain 86 000323 stream temperatures through shading, stabilize the stream banks, and provide erosion control. In addition, CITY green does not calculate the economic impact of cleaner water on recreation, the fishing industry or drinking water filtration. Simply put, the numbers generated by CITY green are likely on the low end in terms of ecological services and the dollar value of the services. 87 000324 Page break 88 000325 Supporting Document H TeCHNICAL MEMORANDUM CH2MHILL Construction Site Sediment and Total Phosphorus Loading PREPARED FOR: Chesterfield County Tim Hare - CH2M HILL Cheri Salas - CH2M HILL PREPARED BY: COPIES: Laurens van der Tak - CH2M HILL DATE: August 15, 2005 Contents Contents............................... 0.................................... 0.00..00.0......0..0..0.......................0........ 89 Introduction................................................................ 0................................................... 89 Soil Loss......... 0...................................00.0........0..0........... 0......0............0....................................... 90 Pilot Sites......................o... 0..00......................................0......00.0.............. 0..0.................................... 90 Soil Loss Computations................................................................................................... 0.............0 90 Erosion and Sediment Control.................................................... 0..0................................... 92 Sediment and Total Phosphorus Delivery.................................................................... 93 Sediment Deli very ..... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0 . . 0 .. . 0 .. . . .. . . . .. . . .. . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . .. .. . . . . . 0 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 93 Phosphorus Delivery................................................. 0...0......0.......0.. 0.......0................................. 96 Conclusion.............................................................................. 0...00............................................... 97 References........... 0......0......0..00...0...0......0......................................... ............0...............0............... 99 Appendix A....................................o............................................................................................. 100 Introduction Chesterfield County staff and residents are concerned that the extensive planning involved with managing the Upper Swift Creek Reservoir watershed will be rendered ineffective by large amounts of construction-related sediment and associated total phosphorus (TP). During a previous study of the watershed, the Watershed Management Master Plan and Maintenance Program for the Swift Creek Reservoir Watershed (CH2M HILL, 2000), a simple modeling exercise was used to estimate the annual construction sediment and phosphorus load to the reservoir. The results indicated up to 8,000 tons per year of sediment and 798,000 pounds per year of TP could be released by construction activities. CH2M HILL has been contracted to conduct a more refined assessment of construction-related loads within the reservoir. The purpose of this technical memorandum (TM) is to describe the approach to and the results of estimating sediment load and TP load generated by construction activity within the Upper Swift Creek Reservoir watershed in Chesterfield County, Virginia. The assessment was conducted in three main steps. 89 000326 1. Compute soil loss for two pilot sites, with and without erosion and sediment control, and determine average annual soil loss per acre based on the results from the two pilot sites 2. Apply the average annual soil loss to the Swift Creek Reservoir watershed based on land anticipated to be developed within each tributary watershed 3. Determine sediment load delivered to Swift Creek Reservoir based on standard sediment delivery ratios and extrapolate the associated TP load The result of this analysis was an estimation of the annual amount of sediment and TP reaching the reservoir from construction-related activities. The remainder of this TM describes the three steps in the analysis, the results, and provides conclusions about how these results impact the previous watershed management plans. Soil Loss Pilot Sites Two pilot sites were selected by the County to represent the range of development potential within the reservoir watershed. Figure 1 shows the locations of the two pilot sites. The Cosby Road High School site is a 63-acre site dedicated to a high school and associated support facilities. It was selected to represent typical commercial and institutional sites, where significant site grading would be required to create level land needed for the facility. The site was modified to reduce the existing 5 to 10 percent slopes to nearly flat slopes for use in constructing the school and associated parking lots and sport fields. The Millcrest at the Brandermill site is an 8-acre section of an existing subdivision. It was selected as a representative plan for residential development. Site grading is limited to creating roads and infrastructure, with limited modification to the residential lots. Soil Loss Computations Soil loss during construction was computed using the Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation, Version 2 (RUSLE2), a computer program developed by the U.S. Department of Agriculture -- Agricultural Research Service and Natural Resource Conservation Service (NRCS) to estimate soil erosion due to rainfall and runoff~ The program was developed to examine erosion due to agricultural activities; however, it is also applicable to construction activity due to the significant land disturbance involved. RUSLE2 is frequently used to estimate erosion for preparing erosion and sediment control plans for construction sites. 90 000327 FIGURE 1 Location of Pilot Sites 91 000328 RUSLE2 is based on the USLE equation, and automates the computation of coefficients reflecting regional climate, land slope, slope length, soil type, and land management, as follows: aj = 'ikj1iSciP i where, allan the ith day: ai = average annual soil loss ri == erosivity factor lei = soil erodibility factor Ii == soil length factor S == slope steepness factor Ci = cover-management factor Pi == supporting practices factor Land slope and slope lengths were computed for each drainage area defmed in the erosion and sediment control plan. Both existing and proposed slopes were evaluated to determine the range of soil loss rates. The drainage areas, slope lengths, and slope steepness for each subbasin for the two pilot sites are summarized in Appendix A. According to the construction plans, the soils at the Millcrest site are dominated by Mayodan gravelly sandy loam at a 12 to 20 percent slope (soil type 151D). Based on the site location and County soil maps, the soils at the Cosby Road High School site are dominated by Mayodan gravelly sandy loam at a 2 to 6 percent slope (soil type 151B). County-specific climate and soils data were available from the NRCS online database (NRCS, 2005) and are directly accessed by the RUSLE2 computer programa Land management parameters are associated with conservation tillage and crop rotation activities. These are not applicable to construction activities, as land is assumed to be bare during construction. The default construction management inputs were selected, which equate to no vegetation or conservation activities (ci=l, Pi=l). Erosion and sediment controls were considered in a separate analysis. The results from RUSLE2 for the two pilot sites indicate that the average annual soil loss rate will range from 7 to 33 tons per acre per year. The results for individual drainage areas for both proposed and existing site grading are provided in Appendix A. The results of this first step assume that the entire site is disturbed throughout the year and that no erosion and sediment control practices were used. Erosion and Sediment Control The sediment control devices proposed on the two pilot construction sites included sediment basins and sediment traps. Literature values from the Center for Watershed Protection were used to determine the percent removal of sediment from the runoff. These values are summarized in Table 1 for the two practices used on the pilot sites, and several additional practices for reference. The reported average percent reduction was applied to the soil loss from the drainage area served by each device and summed to determine the total sediment load discharged from each site with sediment controls. The reduced soil loss rate ranges from 2 to 13 tons per acre per year, when sediment control devices are included. The results of individual drainage areas for both proposed and existing site grading are provided in Appendix A. 92 000329 Other potential sediment control devices that could be considered include silt fence and hay bales. These were not proposed on the pilot sites and are not included in this analysisa These devices are typically used on small areas of disturbance, but tend to be less effective than sediment basins and trapsa Although these devices can have significant localized impacts, it was assumed that from a watershed basis, the variation resulting from these devices was within the range of uncertainty of the results. Erosion controls include temporary seeding of dormant areas, tarps over staging piles, and sod or seeding of completed grading a It was determined that the most effective means of approximating the impacts of erosion control measures was in the amount of time over which land was assumed to be bare, which was taken into account in the extrapolation of soil loss rates to the watersheds. TABLE 1 Percent Reduction in Sediment Load Due to Erosion and Sediment Controls Device Low High Average Sediment Basin 55 100 70 Sediment Trap -7 100 60 Filter Fabric Fence 0 100 70 Vegetative Filter Strip 20 80 70 Seeding (after vegetative establishment) 50 100 90 Sod 98 99 99 Source: EPA, 1993 Sediment and' Total Phosphorus Deliverv Sediment Delivery Once the annual soil loss rate was calculated for 1 acre of land disturbed for an entire year, the results could be applied to construction throughout the watershed. Developable area was calculated for each tributary watershed based on the existing 2004 land use and the build-out land use plans developed to assess the future Upper Swift Creek Land Use Plan. Annual average area disturbed was calculated by dividing developable area by the period of development, 25 years. Average sediment load was then calculated by multiplying the annual area disturbed by the soil loss rates calculated in Section 2 and by the fraction of the year a typical area remains disturbed. A factor of 0.75 was used in this analysis, meaning the typical area is disturbed for 9 months. Table 2 summarizes the annual area disturbed and resulting soil loads for each tributary watershed. 93 000330 TABLE 2 Total Sediment Load from Proposed Development by Tributary Watershed Upper Swift Creek Plan Modeling Support Total Area Annual Average Annual Sediment Annual Sediment Disturbed Area Disturbed Load no ESe Load with ESe Tributary Watershed ( ac/yr) (ac/yr) (ton/yr) (ton/yr) Little Tomahawk Creek 1 ,229 49.2 260 - 1,220 80 - 490 Tomahawk Creek 2,017 80.7 420 - 2,000 140 - 800 Swift Creek / Turkey Creek 4,640 185.6 970 - 4,600 31 0 - 1,840 System Otterdale Creek 1 ,543 61.7 320 - 1 ,530 1 00 - 61 0 Blackman Creek I Horsepen 5,446 217.8 1,140 - 5,400 370 - 2,160 Creek I Deep Creek System Dry Creek 1 ,044 41.8 220 - 1,040 70 - 410 West Branch 674 26.9 140 - 670 50 - 270 Fuqua Creek 769 30.7 160 - 760 50 - 300 Direct Runoff Component 947 37.9 200 - 940 60 - 380 Total 18,310 732.4 3,830 -18,160 1,230 - 7,260 Notes: Total area disturbed is for Chesterfield County only. Land disturbance upstream in Powhatan County is not included in this study. ESC = erosion and sediment controls The average sediment load is the sediment leaving disturbed areas in construction sites. It is not the amount of sediment reaching the reservoir. A large percentage of the sediment load that is dislodged from the land is removed from the tributary flow prior to reaching the reservoir, primarily due to settling during overland and in-channel flows. One method of determining the fraction of sediment load that reaches the reservoir is the application of a sediment delivery ratio (SDR). The SDR used for this study is based on the NRCS National Engineering Handbook (SCS, 1983). Section 3, Chapter 6 of the National Engineering Handbook presents the SDR as a curve in Figure 6-2. A recent study by U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Region 4 (Greenfield, 2001) converts the curve to the following formula: SDR = O.417762A-O.l34958 - 0.127097 where A is the watershed area in square miles. Most of the reservoir's tributaries drain directly to the reservoir and are independent of each other. The best approach to determine the portion of sediment load that reaches the reservoir is to calculate separate SDRs for each tributary. Turkey Creek is included in the Swift Creek system. 94 000331 Blackman Creek is included in the Horsepen Creek! Deep Creek system. Table 3 includes the tributary watershed areas and their corresponding SDRs. Note that the Swift Creek system only includes that part of the watershed within Chesterfield County. Applying the tributary SDRs to the average sediment dislodged from the surface results in the sediment loads that are predicted to be delivered to the reservoir each year. These loads are included in Table 4. TABLE 3 Tributary Watershed Sediment Delivery Ratios Upper Swift Creek Plan Modeling Supporl Tributary Watershed Little Tomahawk Creek Tomahawk Creek Swift Creek I Turkey Creek System Otterdale Creek . Blackman Creek I Horsepen Creek I Deep Creek System Dry Creek West Branch Fuqua Creek Direct Runoff Component Drainage Area (sq. miles) 3.70 5.67 21.76 3.86 11.58 3.06 2.90 2.38 7.03 SDR 0.223 0.203 O. 149 0.221 0.173 0.232 0.235 0.245 O. 194 As an example, this paragraph carries a single watershed through the analysis. Dry Creek is predicted to have 1,044 acres of developed land, which equates to an average of 41.8 acres of land developed per year over the 25-year development horizon. Of this, 41.8 acres times 33e06 ton/ac/yr without erosion and sediment control (ESe) times 0.75 (the portion of year land disturbed) results in 1,036 tons of sediment dislodged from the surfacew Using the SDR for Dry Creek, 1,036 tons per year times 0.232 results in 240 tons of sediment delivered to Swift Creek Reservoir per year. 95 000332 TABLE 4 Sediment Delivery to Upper Swift Creek Reservoir Upper Swift Creek Plan Modeling Supporl Tributary Watershed Little Tomahawk Creek Tomahawk Creek Swift Creek I Turkey Creek System Otterdale Creek Blackman Creek I Horsepen Creek I Deep Creek System Dry Creek West Branch Fuqua Creek Direct Runoff Component Total Sediment Delivery no ESe (ton/yr) 60 - 270 90-410 140 - 680 70 - 340 200 - 930 50 - 240 30 - 160 40 - 190 40 - 180 720 - 3,400 Sediment Delivery with ESe (ton/yr) 20 - 1 00 30 - 160 50 - 270 20 - 140 60 - 370 20 - 1 00 10 - 60 10 - 70 10 - 70 230 - 1 ,350 Phosphorus Delivery Sediment in runoff is a known source of TP. If one can determine the relationship between sediment and TP, then the construction sediment loads delivered to the reservoir can be used to predict the accompanying TP load. The Chesterfield Department of Utilities has established in- stream monitoring stations for each of the main tributaries. These monitoring stations are typically located in the lower part of each tributary watershed, in a reach that has little or no influence from reservoir tailwater. CH2M HILL used the monitoring data collected from 1974 to 1997 to calculate the ratio between total suspended solids (TSS) and TP. The average TSS/TP ratio was calculated from wet weather flow data from the nine monitoring stations. Base flow data was not included in the calculations. The average TSS/TP ratio was 1,009. The resulting TP loads delivered to the reservoir is summarized in Table 5. 96 000333 TABLE 5 Total Phosphorus Delivery by Tributary Watershed Upper Swift Creek Plan Modeling Supporl Tributary Watershed Little Tomahawk Creek Tomahawk Creek Swift Creek I Turkey Creek System Otterdale Creek Blackman Creek / Horsepen Creek I Deep Creek System Dry Creek West Branch Fuqua Creek Direct Runoff Component Total TP Delivery no ESe (Ib/yr) 120 - 540 180 - 810 280 - 1350 140 - 670 400 -1840 100 - 480 60 - 320 80 - 380 80 - 360 1,440 - 6,750 TP Delivery with ESe (I b/yr) 40 - 220 60 - 320 100 - 540 40 - 280 120 - 730 40 - 200 20 - 120 20 - 140 20 - 140 460 - 2,690 Conclusion A typical year in the watershed could see the delivery of720 to 3,400 tons per year of sediment from unprotected construction sites. Erosion and sediment controls are predicted to reduce the annual load to between 230' and 1,350 tons per year. The actual load reaching the reservoir is probably somewhere between the two rangese This is due to a number of factors, including portions of projects that are not protected by erosion and sediment controls, the challenge of properly maintaining the control facilities, and the occurrence of larger storms that exceed the design capacity of the controls. The amount of sediment predicted to reach the reservoir is significantly less than the 8,000 tons per year, as estimated in 1999. The differences between the two estimates can be eXplained by different techniques, development periods, and TSS/TP ratios. If the County can maintain good erosion and sediment controls, then the predicted TP delivery to the reservoir is 460 to 2,780 pounds per year. The Management Plan and updated modeling both point to the required goal in the range between 25,000 and 26,000 pounds of TP per year at proj ected build out of the watershed. In terms of annual TP loading goal, the TP associated with construction sediment is approximately 2 to 11 percent of the annual goal for the reservoir. Without erosion and sediment controls, the range is 1,500 to 6,970 pounds per year, or approximately 6 to 27 percent of the annual goal. Based solely on annual loading rates, the current assimilative capacity of the reservoir should be able to accommodate the additional TP from construction sites if erosion and sediment controls are properly installed and maintained (Figure 2). In time, this could become an issue if erosion and sediment controls are not properly installed. However, the timely establishment of the BMPs identified in the Management Plan will further reduce the construction site TP load reaching the . . reservoIr. 97 000334 References CH2M HILL. 2000. Watershed Management Master Plan and Maintenance Program for the Swift Creek Reservoir Watershed, Chesterfield County, Virginia. May. Greenfield, James M. 2001. Sediment Tool, A Simple Method for Erosion and Sediment Delivery Estimation, Water Environment Federation TMDL Science Issues Conference. May. NRCS. 2005. http://fargo.nser!.purdue.edulrusle2_datawebIRUSLE2 _ Index.htm? action=Go+to+the+officia I+NRCS+RUSLE2+website. April 4. Soil Conservation Service (SCS). 1983. U.S. Department of Agriculture, National Engineering Handbook, Section 3 Sedimentation, Chapter 6 Sediment Sources, Yields, and Delivery Ratios. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). 1993. Guidance Specifying Management Measures For Sources of Non point Pollution in Coastal Waters, Office of Water, EPA 840- B-92-002. January. 99 000336 Appendix A TABLE A-1 Milcrest RUSLE2 Input Data and Results Upper Swift Creek Plan Modeling Supporl Existing Condition Area, ac Slope Slope, Wft Soil Loss Soil Loss, E&SC TSS Soil Loss Length, ft Rate, Tons/yr Removal, % wiESe Tons/AclYr (Avg) (Mid) ST-1 2.3 180 O. 1 00 35 81 60 32 ST-2 2.8 250 0.088 32 90 60 36 ST-3 1.3 190 0.094 32 42 60 17 ST-4 1.5 150 O. 1 00 33 50 60 20 Total 7.9 33 261 ton/yr 104 ton/ac/yr 13 Proposed Condition Area, ac Slope Slope, Wft Soi I Loss Soil Loss, E&SC TSS Soil Loss Length, ft Rate, Tons/yr Removal, 0/0 wIESe Tons/AclYr (Avg) (Mid) Area A 1.08 130 10.4 33 36 60 14 Area B 0.66 150 8.7 26 17 60 7 Area C 1.4 158 8.9 27 38 60 15 Area D 0.85 170 7.4 23 20 60 8 Area E 0.52 160 6.3 18 9 60 4 Area F 1.34 120 9 25 34 60 13 Area G 0.3 50 10 22 7 60 3 Area H 0.3 , 60 10 23 7 60 3 Area I 0.27 20 10 16 4 60 2 Area J 0.35 30 10 18 6 60 3 Total 7.07 25 177 ton/yr 71 ton/ac/yr 10 Range across site conditions wlo ESe 25 to 33 T I Ac/y Range across site conditions wI ESe o to 35 T/Ac/y Average across site conditions wlo ESe 29.1 T I Ac/y Average across site conditions wi ESe 12 T / Ac/y 100 000337 TABLE A-2 Cosby High School RUSLE21nput Data and Results Upper Swift Creek Plan Modeling Support Existing Conditions Slope E&SC TSS Soil Loss Area, Length, S lope, Soil Loss Rate, Soil Loss, Removal, 0/0 wiESe ac ft Nft Tons/AcNr Tons/yr (Avg) (Mid) SB1 8.05 490 26 209 70 63 SB2 5.69 670 0.051 21 119 70 36 SB3 9.55 535 0.080 36 344 70 103 SB4a 8.33 480 0.054 21 175 70 52 SB4b 4.16 230 0.087 30 125 70 37 SB5 9.85 450 O. 1 00 26 256 70 77 ST1 1.50 290 0.079 29 44 60 17 ST2 2.00 340 0.077 30 60 60 24 ST3 1.80 170 0.073 22 40 60 16 ST4 1.30 190 0.071 22 29 60 11 ST5 1.50 340 0.035 12 18 60 7 ST6 1.80 280 0.060 20 36 60 14 ST7 1.49 290 0.088 34 51 60 20 ST8 0.80 200 0.075 26 21 60 8 Total 57.82 26 1526 ton/yr 487 ton/ac/yr 8 Proposed Conditions Slope E&Se TSS Soil Loss Area, Length, Slope, Soil Loss Rate, Soil Loss, Removal, 0/0 wIESe ac ft ftIft Tons/AclYr Tons/yr (Avg) (Mid) SB1 5.90 400 0.038 13 77 70 23 SB2 3.46 180 0.019 5 17 70 5 SB3 11.24 380 0.017 4.9 55 70 17 SB4a 10.60 390 0.034 12 127 70 38 SB4b 5.30 260 0.023 6.7 36 70 11 SB5 7.48 160 0.013 3.3 25 70 7 ST1 2.90 230 0.015 4 12 60 5 ST2 2.90 '230 0.015 4 12 60 5 101 00.0338, TABLE A-2 Cosby High School RUSLE21nput Data and Results Upper Swift Creek Plan Modeling Support ST3 2.90 490 0.020 6.2 18 60 7 5T4 2.00 170 0.020 5.3 11 60 4 Proposed Conditions Slope E&SC TSS Soil Loss Area, Length, Slope, Soil Loss Rate, Soil Loss, Removal, % wiESe ac ft ftlft Tons/AclYr Tons/yr (Avg) (Mid) ST5 2.00 260 0.014 3.7 7 60 3 5T6 1.39 300 0.028 8.7 12 60 5 ST7 1.50 80 0.029 7 11 60 4 ST8 1.50 , 30 0.033 6.5 10 60 4 ST9 2.00 420 0.020 6.1 12 60 5 Total 63.07 7.0 440 ton/yr 142 ton/ac/yr 2 Range across site conditions wlo ESe 7 to 26 T I Ac/y Range across site conditions wi ESe o to 15 T/Ac/yr Average across site conditions wlo ESe 17 T/Ac/y Average across site conditions wi ESe 5 T I Ac/yr 102 000339 Supporting Document I Education & Outreach Program Introduction: The Education and Outreach Program plays an important role in the Office of Water Quality. An informed citizenry is one of most important tools in maintaining and improving water quality. As more citizens move into Chesterfield County, our environmental resources are impacted by the increase in impervious surfaces; storm flows and lawn care practices. The Education and Outreach Program can be categorized in the following areas: general, targeted and volunteer activities. General education and outreach occurs on a daily basis as staff interacts with the public. All staff members utilize the OWQ publications and website as tools. The OWQ receives over 1000 citizen requests per year. Other general outreach occurs by participating in events such as Earth Day Celebrations, attending homeowner's association meetings and water quality monitoring day. Targeted outreach focuses on a specific audience or a specific issue. Local educators are an example of a targeted audience that the Office of Water Quality often serves. Other targeted outreach topics have included neighborhoods that exhibit high levels of nutrients, specific watersheds with issues and perennial flow determination with the private environmental community. Finally, volunteer activities are available for citizens who show an interest in the environment and water quality and want to actively participate in a program. These programs include citizen monitoring, storm drain marking and cleanup efforts. General Education & Outreach: Publications: The Office of Water Quality developed the Water Quality Watch Fact Sheet series in 1997 for general outreach and education that describe a variety of surface water quality issues in Chesterfield County. The purpose of the fact sheets is to promote awareness of Chesterfield's water bodies, water quality problems, and measures the county is taking to address these problems. The:fac~ sheets target both the general population as well as the business community. In addition to the original series, the Resource Protection Area Restoration Guide was created in 2004. This guide includes step-by-step instructions on the proper restoration of a riparian zone that has been disturbed. This guide contains information about Resource Protection Areas (RPAs), planting guidelines as well as an approved plant list. The manual and plant list was developed with input from representatives of the Chesapeake Bay Local Assistance Department, The Virginia Department of Forestry, and Chesterfield County. The manual was developed as a part of a Small Watershed Grant from the Fish & Wildlife Foundation. A series of "Fast Enviro- Facts" fact sheets was also created in 2004 to answer questions commonly asked by citizens. These fact sheets addressed issues such as iron bacteria blooms, foam in creeks and why tree tubes are important in RP A plantings. The Office of Water Quality partners with several other organizations for publications. For proper lawn care techniques relating to water quality, the Chesterfield County Cooperative Extension Service provides numerous brochures and fact sheets. The Friends of Chesterfield's Riverfront publishes a brochure with public access points to water and the Friends of the Lower Appomattox River recently developed a similar publication for the Appomattox River. The Office of Water Quality has found much success in partnering with other organizations for the development & publication of print and internet 103 000340 resources. Several other publications are available from the Office of Water Quality, but are discussed in the "Targeted Education & Outreach Section". A list of all water quality publications can be found in the table on the following page. 104 000341 ial Type Lead Group Target Group Chesterfield County Office of Water Quality website: Web site Office of General http://www,chesterfield.gov/communitydevelopment/waterquality/ Water Quality public Chesterfield County Resource Protection Area Restoration Guide Booklet Office of General Water Quality public Chesterfield County Resource Protection Area Restoration Guide F act Sheet Office of General Chesterfield County Stormwater Management Program Water Quality public Chesapeake Bay Resource Protection Areas The Streams of Chesterfield County Homeowners Guide to Flood Plain Management Business & Industry Guide to Chesterfield County's Illicit Discharge Ordinance Household Guide to Chesterfield County's Illicit Discharge Ordinance Chesterfield County's Stormwater DrainalIe System What is this Orange Slime in my Creek? Fast Enviro Office of General YVhat is this Foam in my Creek? Facts Sheet Water Quality public What are those Tubes in the Field? Pocochsock Creek Community Partnership Brochure Office of Watershed Water Quality Citizens Don't Feed the Lake Brochure Office of Ci tizens Water Quality who live near lakes Storm Drain Markers Plastic Office of General marker Water Quality public adhered to storm drains EcoMasters Interactive Office of 6th grade CD Water Quality lead science teachers Watersheds & Water,Quality in Chesterfield County Power Point Friends of 6th grade Presentation Chesterfield's students Riverfronts Chesterfield Extension Website: Website Chesterfield General http ://11-WW. chesterfiel~. f!ov/HumanServices/ExtensionServices/exthome. asp Extension Public Six Steps to Cleaner Water'(lawn & home) Brochure Chesterfield General Extension Public Home Landscape Practices to Protect Water Quality Brochure Chesterfield General Extension Public Chesterfield County - Did you Know? (Fact sheet on lawn care) Fact Sheet Chesterfi e ld General Extension Public Lawn Care Clinics (5 clinics in addition to being online) Power Point Chesterfield Interested Presentation Extension Public 105 000342 Website: The Chesterfield County Office of Water Quality website, which can be found at http://www~chesterfield.gov/communitydevelopment/waterquality, also serves as a valuable tool for general education & outreach. The above-mentioned publications are available online in a PDF format, a:s well as general water quality information, technical reports and staff contacts~ Many citizens utilize the website to gather information related to various ordinances or to view water quality data. Activities: The Office of Water Quality staff participates in many activities that serve as general outreach and education. These activities range from appearing on local cable television shows to participating in regional educational events such as earth day and Virginia Water Quality Monitoring Day. Written press is another general educational outlet use at both the local and regional level. Staff also responds to citizen inquiries, both via the telephone and by making field visits. The staff also will attend various civic meetings as requested such as homeowner association meetingsa Targeted Education & Outreach: Targeted education & outreach occurs for several reasons. There may be a specific audience, such as local educators, that are seeking specific information~ Another type of targeted education & outreach occurs as a result of a situation or event. The Perennial Determination Workshop would be an example of this type of targeted education~ Whatever be the case, targeted education & outre~ch is very valuable and results are often immediate and measurable after the education event occurs. Educator Training: The Office of Water Quality, in partnership with Friends of Chesterfield's Riverfront plays an active role with the Chesterfield Public School System. Both organizations work with the Science Lead Instructors in developing curriculum, the grants administrator in securing funding and one on one with teachers. Each year, the OWQ and Friends trains teachers in water related SOLs at teacher in-service workshops. These organizations also assist teachers in developing Chesterfield related lessons regarding water quality and give advise on local field trips. Thousands of dollars have been secured in grant funding to assist the CCPS with water quality education. One example of a recent grant was the 3-year BayScaping initiative funded by NOAA-B-WET~ This grant funded the installation of a native BayScape at all elementary & middle schools in the county as well as curriculum development on how to utilize the areas as a meaningful watershed experience (MWE)~ In addition to technical expertise and grant funding, the OWQ also loans equipment to teachers to enhance their curriculum~ The Enviroscape, which depicts non-point pollution and water quality monitoring equipment are among the most popular 106 000343 items on loan. By working with the local educators, the OWQ is able to reach perhaps the largest and most important audience in Chesterfield County, the youth. Targeted Watersheds: Pocoshock Creek: The Office of Water Quality performs physical, chemical and biological stream sampling in its comprehensive monitoring program, the Watershed Assessment and Stream Protection Program. From this collection of data, stream segments are then categorized into general health parameters ranging from "bad" to "excellent" ~ After identifying the health of the stream and its watershed, management strategies are applied. Pocoshock Creek was identified as having "poor" health and a Detailed Watershed Investigation was conducted in 2004 to identify the areas of concern. To complement the scientific monitoring and investigation, an educational & outreach component was developed. The "Pocoshock Creek Community Partnership" was formed as a mechanism to communicate with the community members of the watershed, including homeowners and businesses~ A brochure was developed and published with funds from the Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation for this target audience that identifies the limits of the watershed and steps they 'can take to improve water quality. Don't Feed the Lake: Every water source in Chesterfield County is valuable, but our drinking water sources are especially valuable. A publication titled "Don't Feed the Lake" was developed in the late 1980's to inform citizens on how their lawn care practices could affect the water quality of the reservoir. This publication was updated and revised with funds from the Virginia Division of Chesapeake Bay Local Assistance. The development of this brochure was a partnership of the OWQ, the Cooperative Extension Office and the Friends of Chesterfield's Riverfront~ This brochure also has a link to a "Clean Lakes" website hosted by the extension office that provides additional information to interested citizens. Perennial Steam Determination Workshop: This workshop was a result of the 2001 revisions to the Chesterfield County Chesapeake Bay Preservation Area Designation and Management Regulations that required field determinations of perennial streams. After the adoption of these revised regulations, the Office of Water Quality identified an area of concern: the inconsistent application of the protocols developed for use in conducting field determinations of water bodies with perennial flow. While workshops and training sessio~s had been conducted to train staff from localities on the use of these protocols, there had yet to be a training opportunity in Virginia for the consultants who, in most cases, actually perform the determinations. To address this "gap" in training, Chesterfield County's Office of Water Quality conducted a Perennial Stream Determination Workshop in August 2005~ Funding was provided by the Virginia Division of Chesapeake Bay Local Assistance. Dr. James Gregory from the North Carolina State University and the author of the North Carolina Stream Identification Protocol provided detailed training on the use of this field indicator method both 107 000344 the classroom and in the field. Larry Eaton of the North Carolina Division of Water Quality will also assisted by providing training on benthic macro invertebrates. This four-day workshop had 41 attendees from both the private sector as well as localities. Results were immediately noticed by the staff. Volunteer Activities: Volunteering in an Office of Water Quality program is an excellent way for a citizen to be able to "do something" for the environment. V olunteering can take several forms - either in the form of a long term commitment through water quality monitoring or during one time events such as cleanups and plantings. Both types of volunteering foster a sense of pride in our citizenship and encourage those citizens to take a personal role in their environment. V olunteer Monitoring: The volunteer monitoring data are currently being used to complement the data being collected as a part of the annual bioassesments, field monitoring and storm drain screenings. Objectives of the volunteer monitoring programs are to: . Enhance public education activities and promote stewardship · Involve a cross-section of County citizens . Complement the monitoring requirements of the County's VPDES permit . Provide a team of citizen "stream watchers" who can identify water quality improvements or degradation in their community 108 000345 I ~ ~-;::. .""""- .;;.~ - :.~ .. ___ __ II. --;-. - I... :,. .. ..... - -- '- ... .......... ~ ~ . ., . ..... ~ '3i~~- ~ "o;;~ ~ - ) I - ... ~ ~ __ ... J ...... ~ ~ I ~ ~ II" oil 1~ .. .... . ~ .... .."........ - ... .~~ ~ II =i -. i!l ~ ~~ ~~ . I~ ~ ~l ...."]~ ~ I.... Z IRI ~~'I:.. . .. ...... J 11:. ~ ~ ~ ~'..! LI · ~ ~fll ) ~:- ~ ~. '7 ~ .. .. )' ~,~ I~II - ~fJ ~ ~~ - .... :l: .:::: :-,:-: L I ,. -==- - r.. ..... ~ ~ ~ II 6 ~ I.....r::; !: I! ~ 1.2- J r LJ ill: ~ · . , -II"L L I~ :- .~~j. .. Il- r ').~~~'~~ .~' ~ ~,f~~ t ~ !~I~ ~ ~:;-.!li~~ - -. _ 1"1.-._ ~ltII"'''ill I ..... ~~ :. I ~ ~ ~ ~ · ~.r.::f! :~~~ - n ~,.m ~ ~ ~~1~~~ ~~ ~~ f ....:... -: + ~ it:l I .::.- ~ .. ~ ~ ~~ ~~~, ~~ ~~ ,~ " ~ '::.., ~ · ~ .....~: ... L . fJ i ~-"~~~ ~ ~',~~~h ........ 1- ~~ I .... tI. -.L. ~ ~.:.:-. i"ti-;; i5.~'- ',' -~~r -~' ~i ~~:~'~.J'~ , .~~ - - -~t.,:J ,,~-~:i ~ "I:-i :.a.... -: I I\:-. .. \1 =~ .-: .~~~~ 1 .::.....1""-: ~ ~!;:. -. ~. 1 ~ .1 .fI ~~ ~0t;' -=, -; -- ...... ... It · .. II'" -J .. IV ri~. :.:... ;r .. ~ I ..... 1 ... V.. -=. - ... - J ... .." .. .I I :.-:v-?t-. -. ... ... · -: I I. t 1"- I ~ ~ f. -:- -: .-" .rs_ ~~:II~ :-:......: ~... _1....1 .. ~ ~ ~- ~.~ i:'~. . · ~ -: - ~ -p _:... ....... ~ ... .....: :". ~ . "~.i.. _ ! t~1-: ~ I~ ~ ."... -::w.... ... ~~ ...~... I ~;~.. ~ ~,....... II --1:---; ~., l:;.p~, . .: I ~~. ~. ..::. ~ ~ r;x.:. - ~ _ i.:~ I 1 ~ · j.7 ... .:-; .. 2'"". ...... .~~~ ~... ... .. E ~:a. ~ rl -.f^ .....-:-,::...,.... ~~.. .. ..... .. ..-: ~ ~ ,/' 11::1'::';'" · i. · .... ~~~ ~ ) 1) l -.. CI -;-~~ :-1: y IIIi ....: ~:. .-... · ~..,. ~ ~~. : . · ';-:".i. r.. ...-:- 1 ~ ~ ?: .... ; · ' , , :' :\',.;~ ....;-~ I ' , 1';:.., ~,: ~ .. " LL....... ~..... (, ':, ~Y:'g I ~~ ~ ' '\fI:::" I fII: -. · .. r~ .I- -...II :. ~~I :':E.r:r.~ ~~'~.:i~~"'..rt':..~ ...~ ...j :~"4:$~ -i:r.5iJ W'~,fi'f~r::.-I';:"l!"':"'::-, --hi: ~~..~ ;: '~;;..:-: 'U~ i~~ .. -=: ~I~~:~ 1 --=.. . -I.., --..... ~ . ... ... ... :-" ~. .. ..... ~ i!!:: :A:::- ':-)i ~ ... ~ IT-. .. .-I..:kr!IiI.: I · .. I. ~ · ~...: - - Z-r.:- ~ I.~ ~ ~ If. I.. ~ ~ :: y: ~r ~ · ~ .. ....::... ;. --t.. ~-!= .. ~ ..;.:.. =-:-D · -:-- :.~. ~ ~ ; L:~:" ~ -.. .,. .....1 -= r. ,-..... .......:. II .. ... 1~"" · :::..... : I.. : ;r;. .., -... . .. .:..-.. ....... _ 'I.a. .... . ~, _ ..... · - · _ . .. . jJ · _ .., - .. ..!i. :.... . I _ _...... .... L.i .. .. . I. .. I.!!I . rI'II' · . ... .. .... I . (6) sites are being chemically tested every week by a team of 14 volunteers. These sites were selected with input from OWQ. One of the volunteers enters data for the group and acts as the QAlQA. Data is housed in the Alliance for the Chesapeake Bay database and all data is accepted by the DEQ. Volunteer Cleanup Efforts: The OWQ actively participates in the James River Regional Cleanup, hosted by the James River Advisory Council. This event takes place the second weekend of June and attracts over 300 citizens in Chesterfield County. The county offers 3 -4 sites in various locations along the James River and its tributaries for citizens. Over 300 bags of trash were removed by the volunteers at this one day event. The OWQ also hosts targeted stream cleanups as the need arises. For example, a community cleanup was held along Pocoshock Creek after staff identified an illegal dumping area. Local businesses of the watershed donated lunches and citizens from the watershed attended the event. Volunteer Riparian Buffer Plantings: Riparian buffers are among one of the most valuable resources in protecting water quality. Unfortunately, many riparian buffers have been altered and are not functioning to their full potential. Several riparian buffers in Chesterfield County have been restored with the aid of volunteers. These projects were funded by a Chesapeake Bay Small Watershed Grant and volunteers performed the actual planting with the aid of Maters Gardeners for planting quality. In addition to these sites performing an ecological function, they also have educational signage and are located at parks for maximum educational visibility. Volunteer Riparian Buffer Monitoring: The Volunteer Riparian Buffer Monitoring program is the newest volunteer program and was implemented in May 2006. This program tracks the progress of restored riparian buffers in the county. Funds have been secured for this program from a National Fish and Wildlife Foundation Chesapeake Bay Small Watershed Grant. Organizations will adopt a riparian buffer and make yearly surveys, gather plant survival data and take photographs. Storm Drain Marking: The Storm Drain Marking Program was piloted by purchasing two thousand markers with funding from the Chesapeake Bay Small Watershed Grant administered by the National Fish and Wildlife Foundation. These markers include the name of the river, stream or reservoir to which the area drains as well as the anti-pollution message of "No Dumping!" and the County's illicit discharge hotline number. After a successful pilot period, Chesterfield County received a second grant to purchase an additional 10,500 markers and expand the program countywide. Various groups have participated in this program including local schools, shopping centers and scout groups. When utilized as a scout project, an "educational component" is encouraged. The scout 110 000347 is encouraged to research nonpoint source pollution and develop educational materials for the community. These activities will not only educate the citizens and build communication skills for the youth, but also ensure success in markers being left on the storm drains. To date, approximately 3000 markers have been applied in over 400 neighborhoods. This covers six of the ten major watersheds in Chesterfield County. Upper Swift Creek: All of the above mentioned categories of education and outreach would be valuable to implement in the Upper Swift Creek, but a targeted education & outreach approach with a strong volunteer base would have the greatest impact. Publications and programs should be developed to specifically address the challenges and issues of the Upper Swift Creek Watershed, stressing the importance of protecting the Swift Creek Reservoir as a primary drinking water source. The citizens of this watershed should have a heightened awareness of the watershed in which they live and their personal effects on the water quality. This can be accomplished by working the various audiences. Several ideas include: working with the CCPS to develop a special curriculum for schools in the USC, develop a county-sponsored volunteer program specifically for watershed residents and to encourage homeowners associations to include water quality measures such as, RP A language in their covenants. The citizens of the Upper Swift Creek Watershed need to feel that they are supported and encouraged by Chesterfield County in their efforts to maintain and improve the environmental resources. 111 00034B Blank page 112 00034.9 Subdivision & Utility Ordinance Amendments - Mandatory Water & Wastewater AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE CODE OF THE COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD, 1997, AS AMENDED, BY AMENDING AND RE-ENACTING SECTIONS 17-72,17-84,18-63 AND 18-64 RELATING TO MANDA TORY SEWER AND WATER CONNECTIONS IN THE UPPER SWIFT CREEK PLAN AREA BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County: (1) That Sections 17-72, 17-84, 18-63 and 18-64 of the Code of the County of Chesterfield. 1997, as amended, is amended and re-enacted to read as follows: 000 Sec. 17-72. Improvements--Required. 000 (k) Connection to the county water supply system shall be required in any of the following circumstances except as may be waived by the planning commission per County Code section, 18-63: 000 ill When a lot is located within the area of the Upper Swift Creek Plan and sut!gested for any use other than Deferred Growth., unless residential zoning was obtained for such subdivision prior to (date of adoption). 000 (n) Connection to the county wastewater supply system shall be required in any of the following circumstances except as may be waived by the planning commission per County Code section 18-64: 000 ill When a lot is located within the area of the Upper Swift Creek Plan and suggested for any use other than Deferred Growth.. unless residential zoning was obtained for such subdivision prior to (date of adoption). 000 113 000350 Sec. 17-84. Standards for lots and parcels served by onsite sewage disposal systems. 000 (g) No subdivision orland within the Upper Swift Creek Plan for which residential zoning is obtained after (date of adoption) may utilize onsite wastewater disposal systems unless all lots in such subdivision are at least one acre in size. 000 Sec. 18-63. Mandatory water connections in certain areas. 000 ill All structures which are located on property that is included in the Upper Swift Creek Plan and su~(!ested for any use other than Deferred Growth and which received zoning aporoval after (date of adoption) shall connect to the water system. However'l the following structures shall not be required to connect unless connection to the water system is otherwise required bv law: ill Temporary manufactured or mobile homes; ill Structures that were authorized by conditional uses or special exceptions which were renewed after (date of adoption); ill Structures that are authorized by conditional uses or special exceptions that were granted after (date of adoption) if the use that is permitted by the conditional use or special exception is incidental to a principal use that was previously allowed with a private well: ill Governmental structures and institutional buildings: and ill Residences that are located on lots that are exempt from the requirements of the subdivision ordinance. fej ill For purposes of this section "structure" and "institutional building" shall have the same meaning as in the zoning ordinance f!:) (g) The planning commission may grant exceptions to subsections (b) and (c) during schem8;tic plan, site plan or tentative subdivision review. The planning commission may also grant exceptions to subsections (b), (c), aOO-( d) and ( e) to an applicant who files an application with the planning department on a form prescribed by the director of planning and who pays a fee of $260.00 to the planning department, if the applicant is not subject to the schematic, site plan or subdivision review process. The planning commission shall find that: (1) The use of a private well will not adversely affect the ability to extend public water to other property; 114 000351 (2) The use of a private well will not encourage future development that is inconsistent with the comprehensive plan; and (3) The use of a private well is not reasonably likely to adversely affect the public health, safety or welfare. The planning commission may impose conditions to mitigate the impact of any exception that it grants. Sec. 18-64. Mandatory wastewater connection in certain areas. 000 @ All structures which are located on property that is included in the Upper Swift Creek Plan and suggested for any use other than Deferred Growth and which received zoning approval after (date of adoption) shall connect to the wastewater system. However'l the following structures shall not be required to connect unless connection to the wastewater system is otherwise required by law: ill Temporary manufactured or mobile homes~ ill Structures that were authorized by conditional uses or special exceptions which were renewed after (date of adoption)~ ill Structures that are authorized by conditional uses or special exceptions that were granted after (date of adoption) if the use that is permitted by the conditional use or special exception is incidental to a principal use that was previously allowed with a septic system; ffi Governmental structures and institutional buildin~s~ and ill Residences that are located on lots that are exempt from the requirements of the subdivision ordinance. Bit-W For purposes of this section, "structure," "single-family dwelling" and "institutional building" shall have the same meaning as in the zoning ordinance. W.iD. The planning commission may grant exceptions to subsections (a), (b).1 an6: (c) and (d) during schematic plan, site plan or tentative subdivision review. The planning commission may also grant exceptions to subsections (a), (b).1 an6: (c) and (d) to an applicant who files an application with the planning department on a form prescribed by the director of planning and who pays a fee of $260.00 to the planning department, if the applicant is not subject to the schematic, site plan or subdivision review process. The planning commission shall find that: (1) The use of an on-site disposal system will not adversely affect the ability to extend public wastewater sewer to other property; (2) The use of an on-site disposal system will not encourage future development that is inconsistent with the comprehensive plan; and 115 000352 (3) -"The use of an on-site disposal septic system is not reasonably likely to adversely affect the public health, safety or welfare. The planning commission may impose conditions to mitigate the impacts of any exception that it grants. (2) That these ordinances shall become effective immediately upon adoption. 116 000353 Subdivision & Utility Ordinance Amendment - Prohibition of Water & Wastewater in the Deferred Growth Area AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE CODE OF THE COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD, 1997, AS AMENDED, BY ENACTING SECTIONS 17-72.1,18-64.1 and 18-64.2 OF THE SUBDIVISION AND UTILITY ORDINANCES RELATING TO UTILITIES IN THE UPPER SWIFT CREEK PLAN. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County: (1) That Sections 17-72.1, 18-64.1 and 18-64.2 of the Code of the County of Chesterfield, 1997, as amended, are enacted to read as 10 llows: 000 Sec. 17-72.1 Imnrovements--Prohibited. (a) All structures which are located on property that is included in the Upper Swift Creek Plan and suggested for the Deferred Growth area shall be prohibited from connecting to the county water system.. to any non-governmental public water svstem.. or to any private water supply system designed to serve more than one lot. (b) All structures which are located on property that is included in the Doper Swift Creek Plan suggested for the Deferred Growth area shall be prohibited from connecting to the county wastewater system"! to any non-governmental public wastewater system.. or to any private wastewater supply system desig:ned to serve more than one lot. 000 Sec. 18-64.1. Prohibited water connections in certain areas. All structures which are located on property that is included in the Upper Swift Creek Plan and suggested for the Deferred Growth area shall be prohibited from connecting to the county water system'l to any non-governmental public water system.. or to any private water supply system designed to serve more than one lot. Sec. 18-64.2. Prohibited wastewater connection in certain areas. All structures which are located on property that is included in the Upper Swift Creek Plan suggested for the Deferred Growth area shall be prohibited from connecting to the county wastewater system" to any non-governmental public wastewater system" or to any private wastewater supply system designed to serve more than one lot. 117 000.35,4 (2) That this ordinance shall become effective immediately upon adoption. 118 000355 Zoning Ordinance Amendment - Buffers AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE CODE OF THE COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD, 1997, AS AMENDED, BY AMENDING AND RE-ENACTING SECTIONS 19-520,19-522 and 19-523 OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE RELATING TO BUFFERS BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County: (1) That Sections 19-520, 19-522 and 19-523 01 the Code of the County of Chesterfield. 1997, as amended, is amended and re-enacted to read aslollows: Secs. 19-520. Purpose and intent. (a) Buffers shall be designed to provide a horizontal distance and open space between certain uses; preserve vegetation; provide transition and separation; reduce noise and glare; aa4lef maintain privacy~ and/or oreserve existing forested vistas adiacent to arterial roads. Buffers shall provide intermittent visual separation between uses. 000 Sees. 19-522. Buffer and screening requirements. (a) Buffers: Buffers shall be provided as shown on the buffer width matrixes in section 19-523. Landscaping shall be accomplished within required buffers as follows: 000 (5) A 200-foot buffer shall consist of an unbroken strio of open space and shall be planted at three times the density of perimeter landscaping C. 000 Sees. 19-523. Buffer width matrix. (a) Buffers between adiacent properties: The required width of buffers shall be determined from the following matrix. The left column of the matrix represents the zoning of the lot on which the buffer must be provided and the top column of the matrix represents the zoning district of property contiguous to the zoning lot. The interior numbers in the matrix represent the width in feet of the required buffer on the zoning lot. However, whenever the primary use on a parcel zoned 0, 119 000356 C or I is a single family residential subdivision, adjacent parcels shall be required to apply the buffer matrix below as though the property is residentially zoned. 120 000357 BUFFER WIDTH MATRIX A* R-7/88 R-TH/R-MF MH Districts A* + + R-7/88 + + + 50** R- TH/R-MF + 50** MH Districts + 40 0-1 + 50 0-2 + 40 C-l + 50 C-2 + 75 C-3 + 75 C-4 + 100 C-5 100 100 I-I 100 100 1-2 100 100 1-3 *Note: In all zoning districts expect industrial zoned districts, buffers are only required adjacent to property zoned "A" when the property is vacant and its designation on the comprehensive plan is for residential uses. Property zoned 1-1 through 1-3 require a buffer when adjacent to property zoned "A" that is occupied by a residential use or the property is designated on the comprehensive plan for residential use. **Note: Where property zoned R-7 through R-88 is adjacent to property zoned R- TH, R-MF, or MH, a buffer shall be required on the R-TH, R-MF, or MH property. No buffers are necessary between any single-family residential districts unless required by the board of supervisors, planning commission (modification to development standards and requirements only) or board of zoning appeals. b. Buffers adiacent to streets: The required width of buffers shall be determined from the following matrix. Arterial Streets Upr>er Swift Creek Plan area R-7/88/R-TH 200 121 000358 Other areas 50 R-7/88/R-TH Collector Streets R-7/88/R-TH 35 Residential Collector Streets R-7/88/R-TH 30 Local streets to negate double frontage condition R-7/88/R-TH 20 (2) That this ordinance shall become effective immediately upon adoption. 122 000359 Subdivision Ordinance Amendment - Buffers AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE CODE OF THE COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD, 1997, AS AMENDED, BY AMENDING AND RE-ENACTING SECTIONS 17-62, 17-70 AND 17-83 OF THE SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE RELATING TO BUFFER CONDITIONS IN THE UPPER SWIFT CREEK PLAN BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County: (1) That Sections 17-62, 17-70 and 17-83 of the Code of the County of Chesterfield, 1997, as amended, are amended and re-enacted to read asfollows: Sec. 17-62. Standard conditions. 000 (h) Any ,required buffers are subject to the requirements of section 17-70 (a) and (b )~ 000 Sec. 17-70. Buffers and Special Setbacks. w Buffers and special setbacks outside the Upper Swift Creek Plan geographv" or within the Doper Swift Creek geography for lots which have a tentative olat approved prior to (date of adoption). L W For lots which have a tentative plat approved after February 27, 2001, buffers shall be exclusive of easements which are generally parallel to the buffer, required setbacks and street cut and fill slopes, and shall be preserved in an undisturbed condition unless otherwise approved by the director of planning. Easements crossing buffers shall generally be at right angles or shall cross the buffer so as to have the least impact to the buffer~ 2. fb) Post construction vegetation within the buffer shall meet a standard of not less than one and one half times the perimeter yard landscaping "C" quantity requirements as defined in County Code section 19-518 prorated for every 25 feet of depth. If insufficient vegetation exists within the buffer as determined by the director of planning, the subdivider shall submit a landscape plan to the director of planning for review and approval prior to release of the final check plat review comments. The subdivider shall install the required plant material prior to recordation. If conditions do not exist for good plant survival as determined by the 123 000360 director of planning, surety shall be provided to the county in the amount sufficient to guarantee the installation approved by the director of planning and in a form as indicated in section 17-73(a). The planning department shall hold any required surety. Any such installation shall be completed prior to state acceptance of the subdivision's streets. ~ ts1 Buffers of the following minimum width shall be provided adjacent to existing and proposed streets with the following classifications: a. fB Arterial streets--50 feet. b. ~ Collector streets--35 feet. ~ ~ Residential collector streets--30 feet. d. f41 Local streets to negate double frontage condition--20 feet. 4. W Adjacent to limited access streets, a setback distance of 200 feet, exclusive of required yards, shall be provided from the limited access street right-of- way, unless a noise study demonstrates that a lesser distance is acceptable as approved by the director of transportation. Natural vegetation shall be retained within the setback area unless removal is required to install noise attenuation measures or is approved by the planning commission. ~ fej Setbacks from temporary turnarounds easements shall conform to permanent cul-de-sac right-of-way standards. 6. ft) A minimum setback for all structures of 20 feet shall be provided from any petroleum product transmission pipeline easement or 35 feet from the pipeline whichever is greater. 000 !h1 ~Buffers and special setbacks within the Upper Swift Creek Plan geography for lots which have a tentative plat approved after (date of adoption). ill For lots which have a tentative plat a-pproved after (date of adoption)" buffers shall be exclusive of easements which are generally parallel to the buffer (except for buffers along arterial streets which shall allow within the buffer a maximum of 100 feet of total easement width generally parallel to the buffer" so long as easements are located a minimum of 25 feet from subdivision lot lines)" required setbacks and street cut and fill slopes" and shall be preserved in an undisturbed condition unless otherwise approved by the director of planning. Easements crossing buffers shall generally be at right an~les or shall cross the buffer so as to have the least impact to the buffer. 124 000361. ill Post construction vegetation within the buffer shall meet a standard of not less than one and one half times the perimeter yard landscaping "C" quantity requirements as defined in County Code section 19-518 prorated for every 25 feet of depth. If insufficient vegetation exists within the buffer as determined by the director of planning,! the subdivider shall submit a landscape plan to the director of planning for review and approval prior to release of the final check plat review comments. The subdivider shall install the required plant material prior to recordation~ If conditions do not exist for good plant survival as determined bv the director of planning'! surety shall be provided to the county in the amount sufficient to ~arantee the installation approved bv the director of planning and in a form as indicated in section 17-73(a). The planning department shall hold any required surety. Any such installation shall be completed prior to state acceptance of the subdivision's streets. (3) Buffers of the following minimum width shall be provided adjacent to existing and proposed streets with the following classifications: W Arterial streets--200 feet .oil Collector streets--35 feet. 10 Residential collector streets--30 feet. @ Local streets to negate double fronta~e condition--20 feet. (4) Adiacent to limited access streets'! a setback distance of200 feet'! exclusive of required yards'! shall be provided from the limited access street right-of-wav" unless a noise study demonstrates that a lesser distance is acceptable as approved by the director of transportation. Natural vegetation shall be retained within the setback area unless removal is required to install noise attenuation measures or is approved by the planning commission. (5) Setbacks from temporary turnarounds easements shall conform to permanent cul-de-sac right-of-wav standards. (6) A minimum setback for all structures of20 feet shall be provided from any petroleum product transmission pipeline easement or 35 feet from the pipeline whichever is greaterw 000 Sec. 17-83. Minimum requirements. 000 125 000362 (c) If a subdivision borders on or contains an existing or proposed arterial or collector street, the director of transportation may require the subdivider to limit access to said street(s) requiring a local street design utilizing a series of cul-de- sacs and/or loop streets. The lots shall only be entered from such a local street, and a buffer as required in section 17-70 (a) or section 1 7 - 70 (b) shall be provided along the lot lines adjacent to the arterial or collector street. (2) That this ordinance shall become effective immediately upon adoption. 126 000363 Chesterfield County, Virginia Memorandum DATE: WL Y 3, 2007 TO: :CHESTERFIELD COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: RICHARD MCELFISH, DIRECTOR OF ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING SCOTT FLANIGAN, WATER QUALITY MANAGER SUBJECT: PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO ORDINANCES RELATING TO WATER QUALITY IN THE UPPER SWIFT CREEK WATERSHED The Planning Commission scheduled a public hearing for July 19, 2006 to discuss the attached proposed amendment relating to water quality in the Upper Swift Creek Watershed. The watershed consists of land in the county located upstream of the Swift Creek Reservoir Dam. The proposed amendment will promote development standards that are consistent with the protection of critical natural systems within the watershed and facilitate the county's water quality goals for area streams and the Swift Creek Reservoir. The proposed amendment would require that the post-development total phosphorus load for all land uses within the watershed, except agricultural practices, shall not exceed 0.16 pounds per acre per year. Vested developments would not be affected. This new standard recognizes the importance of protecting the watershed by ensuring that development within the watershed contributes to the maintenance of water quality. Staff will be available at the July 17, 2007 work session to further discuss the proposed amendment. Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend approval of the proposed change to the Board of Supervisors. c: Lane B. Ramsey, County Administrator M.D. "Pete" Stith, Deputy County Administrator for Community Development Kirkland A. Turner, Director of Planning 127 000364 AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE CODE OF THE COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD, 1997, AS AMENDED, BY AMENDING AND RE-ENACTING SECTION 19-238 OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE RELATING TO WATER QUALITY REQUIREMENTS IN THE UPPER SWIFT CREEK WATERSHED BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County: (1) That Section 19-238 of the Code of the County of Chesterfield. 1997, as amended, is amended and fe-enacted to read as follows: Sec. 19-238. Development regulations. 000 (d) (1) Stormwater runoff shall be controlled to achieve the following: a. For any new use or development, the post-development, nonpoint- source pollution runoff loads of phosphorous and lead shall not exceed the following: (i) Phosphorus: 1. The post-development total phosphorus load for all land uses except agricultural practices residential uses located in areas identified in the Midlothian .(\rea CotBfllUnity Plan for 10\Tl density residential (1.01 to 2.0 units per acre), in the Route 288 Corridor Plan for Residential (1 to 2.0 dT,,"/ellings per acre), and in the Upper ST,,"/ift Creck Plan for single family residential: (2.0 units/acre or less), shall not exceed ~ 0.16 pounds per acre per year. ~ The post de",elopmcnt total phosphorus load for all other uses shall not exceed 0 .15 pounds per acre per yeaf. 000 (2) That this ordinance shall become effective immediately upon adoption. 128 000365 Statement PreQented at the Board of SuperviQorQ Publie Bearing Regarding the Pruposed Upper Swift Creek Plan Revision By Ryland Reamy - President - Brandermill Community Association August 22, 2007 Mr. Chainnan: Members of the Board: Mr. Stegmaier: I am Ryland Reamy? a resident of Chesterfield County and President of the Brandennill Community Association. On behalf of the BCA's Board of Directors and the residents of Brandermill, I am speaking to advocate deferral of action on the current version of the Upper Swift Creek Plan Revision and remand to the Planning Commission for resolution of the many pending issues. In addition, action on all pending zoning CAses involving properties in the geographical area included in the Upper Swift Creek Plan should be deferred until the Plan is approved. For important and valid reasons, at their July meeting, the Planning Commission concluded that, in its present fonn, the proposed plan was fundamentally flawed. Numerous issues remain unresolved regarding: . the steps needed to ensure that the Swift Creek Reservoir will remain viable as a critically needed source of drinking water, . the need for, size and location of the proposed deferred growth area, . the inadequacy of current funding mechanisms to pay for the projected requirements for transportation, schools and other elements of infrastructure which will be needed to support further growth in the affected area, etc., . the specific ordinance, policy and practice changes needed to effectively monitor and enforce the provisions of the plan to ensure the desired outcomes. Unless these issues are resolved satisfactorily and effectively, it is certain that the consequences will be significantly adverse for all stakeholders: · Approving further development without adequate protections of water quality and the environment or without adequate and equitable mechanisms to fund the infrastructure needed to support it will inevitably lead to a lower quality of life, overcrowding of public facilities, loss of a critical source of drinking water and higher taxes and fees for all individuals and businesses. . Approving plans, ordinances, policies and practices which have the practical effect of limiting economic development and the availability of affordable housing would also have seriously negative consequences for everyone. Therefore, it is critically important that you: . allow the Planning Commission and Staff sufficient time to resolve the pending issues and . defer action on all pending residential zoning cases in the Plan area until these issues are more fully resolved. To do otherwise in the face of the likely adverse consequences, would significantly erode the confidence of Chesterfield County's citizens in their elected leadership. In the event that there are pending cases which you do not have the authority to further defer, we strongly advocate that they be subjected to the provisions of the Upper Swift Creek Plan Revision and accompanying ordinances proposed by the Planning Commission or that these cases be denied. It is vitally important that growth in the USC Watershed and throughout the county not be allowed to adversely affect the environment, availability of clean drinking water, quality of life, quality of education, safety or tax burden on the citizens of Chesterfield. It is also imperative that the growth management tools employed by the county not impede economic development. Although the current version of the revised plan is a good step in the direction of achieving the desired outcomes, much remains to be done to ensure that unintended consequences do not result from its implementation. Please ensure that the additional steps required to prevent this from happening are given your highest priority. In conclusion, large numbers of the county's citizens and members of the business community are becoming increasingly dissatisfied with the ineffectiveness of the ordinances, practices, decision making processes and funding mechanisms currently being employed to manage growth. Providing ample evidence that significant change is needed are: . the increasing congestion on our highways, . overcrowding in our schools, . escalating transportation funding shortfalls, which now exceed $1.5 billion, and . inequities in current infrastructure funding methodologies. As a result, your constituents are acutely interested in and paying close attention to the decisions being made by the leadership of Chesterfield to more effectively address growth related issues. Weare confident that as our elected leaders you will want to be responsive to these concerns and effective in taking the required corrective actions. Thank you. TO THE CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS: In case the Public Hearing for the Upper Swift Creek Comprehensive Plan revision does not come up on the schedule before other duties require me to leave, I would like to register my presence at the meeting tonight. NAME: & J~W _ ,~Y-<J ADDRESS .40!r! ~ ~ ~. '-I~A~ . OlJL ~;;IJ ~ DATE August 22. 2007 "" I (we) ask you, in the name of responsible growth in Chesterfield County, to vote tonight to remand the Revision of the Comprehensive Plan in our area back to the Planning Commission to address serious issues that have not been resolved fairly for all stakeholders. I (we) also ask you to defer all zoning cases in the Swift Creek Watershed until the Revised Comprehensive Plan and supporting ordinances are in place. I understand that you have the legal authority to defer cases for as long as one year. 1 (we) also ask you to remember that adequate infrastructure provision in the Comprehensive Plan in our area has unique problems because we have the added responsibility of taking care of the Swift Creek Reservoir in all of our land uses. The drinking water in the Reservoir is for all of the public, not just the residents of the watershed. Signed ~~~~ ( OPTIONAL: ADDITIONAL COMMENTS ~ TO THE CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS: In case the Public Hearing for the Upper Swift Creek Comprehensive Plan revision does not come up on the schedule before other duties require me to leave, I wo~ld like to register ~ presence at the meeting tonight. I / j,/ /." NAME: '/ ;11'-' ;1 It. /I.'/l ;- I/-rf <'0> ADDRESS LJU /lj /1/1..'/11\,1;;; c1,;v-e <~,r, . ']" .."; l _OJ ....) j" , I ,~ oJ t i .~"" DATE August 22, 2007 I (we) ask you, in the name of responsible growth in Chesterfield County, to vote tonight to remand the Revision of the Comprehensive Plan in our area back to the Planning Commission to address serious issues that have not been resolved fairly for all stakeholders. I (we) also ask you to defer all zoning cases in the Swift Creek Watershed until the Revised Comprehensive Plan and supporting ordinances are in place. I understand that you have the legal authority to defer cases for as long as one year. I (we) also ask you to remember that adequate infrastructure provision in the Comprehensive Plan in our area has unique problems because we have the added resDonsibility of taking care of the Swift Creek Reservoir in all of our land uses. The drinking water in the Reservoir is for all of the public, not just the residents of the watershed. Signed ........... ." /i/! ; 1<'-"-' -.,.) " ~ .1/ ',' \ A ", ",',.......//,~, /' y _. ~. ~ ,-)(,n~/// /.,~. ,,' .... l""",....... ; .-/ OPTIONAL: ADDITIONAL COMMENTS ~ TO THE CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS: In case the Public Hearing for the Upper Swift Creek Comprehensive Plan revision does not come up on the schedule before other duties require me to leave, I would like to register my presence at the meeting tonight. NAME: JltiLtJ itJ,li$o J ADDRESS -'1016 ;11e,iYee" eU~ ~~ ~3/1'L , DATE August 22, 2007 I (we) ask you, in the name of responsible growth in Chesterfield County, to vote tonight to remand the Revision of the Comprehensive Plan in our area back to the Planning Commission to address serious issues that have not been resolved fairly for all stakeholders. I (we) also ask you to defer all zoning cases in the Swift Creek Watershed until the Revised Comprehensive Plan and supporting ordinances are in place. I understand that you have the legal authority to defer cases for as long as one year. I (we) also ask you to remember that adequate infrastructure provision in the Comprehensive Plan in our area has unique problems because we have the added resoonsibility of taking care of the Swift Creek Reservoir in all of our land uses. The drinking water in the Reservoir is for all of the public, not just the residents of the watershed. . Signed ~/d~ OPTIONAL: ADDITIONAL COMMENTS - TO THE CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS: In case the Public Hearing for the Upper Swift Creek Comprehensive Plan revision does not come up on the schedule before other duties require me to leave, I would like to register my presence at the meeting tonight. NAME: M 14 veL c t\u2cA-- ADDRESS ,.B7VD LlJ'l tJ'"f7!;ef::et<wfL( gLD4 e Hl{JbtJY'd1HV vA 23// L t DATE August 22, 2007 I (we) ask you, in the name of responsible growth in Chesterfield County, to vote tonight to remand the Revision of the Comprehensive Plan in our area back to the Planning Commission to address serious issues that have not been resolved fairly for all stakeholders. I (we) also ask you to defer all zoning cases in the Swift Creek Watershed until the Revised Comprehensive Plan and supporting ordinances are in place. I understand that you have the legal authority to defer cases for as long as one year. I (we) also ask yOU to remember that adequate infrastructure provision in the Comprehensive Plan in our area has unique problems because we have the added responsibility of takina care of the Swift Creek Reservoir in all of our land uses. The drinking water in the Reservoir is for all of the public, not just the residents of the wate Signed '22.. icoc(. 2'tJe' OPTIONAL: ADDITIONAL COMMENTS ~ TO THE CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS: In case the Public Hearing for the Upper Swift Creek Comprehensive Plan revision does not come up on the schedule before other duties require me to leave, I wo, UI',dli;lkO register "Arlr sence t the meeting tonight. /; 1 . ,} NAME: /!/;;~" ~ " ~c/ ADDRESS 3r~;;'~""~ l&A,-~ <:7o,d.cL. (1)uru+ ~ (\ ',')Lmf1/.AfV/ DATE August 22. 2007 I (we) ask you, in the name of responsible growth in Chesterfield County, to vote tonight to remand the Revision of the Comprehensive Plan in our area back to the Planning Commission to address serious issues that have not been resolved fairly for all stakeholders. I (we) also ask you to defer all zoning cases in the Swift Creek Watershed until the Revised Comprehensive Plan and supporting ordinances are in place. I understand that you have the legal authority to defer cases for as long as one year. I (we) also ask yOU to remember that adequate infrastructure provision in the Comprehensive Plan in our area has unique problems because we have the added resoonsibility of takino care of the Swift Creek Reservoir in all of our land uses. The drinking water in the Reservoir is for all of the public, not ;ust the residents of th ~:t, rsh . L ! /~ '\ Signed t1Jux/J.. < \ ) / OPTIONAL: ADDITIONAL COMMENTS P TO THE CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS: In case the Public Hearing for the Upper Swift Creek Comprehensive Plan revision does not come up on the schedule before other duties require me to leave, I would like to register my presence at the meeting tonight. NAME: VA fL11i.5 1J1I-'-'SdlV ADDRESS t.J ~/(J /{O Ty /Zlt:S (10V,z: T/Cte.;e. :!- 8 f /Z- r DATE August 22, 2007 I (we) ask you, in the name of responsible growth in Chesterfield County, to vote tonight to remand the Revision of the Comprehensive Plan in our area back to the Planning Commission to address serious issues that have not been resolved fairly for all stakeholders. I (we) also ask you to defer all zoning cases in the Swift Creek Watershed until the Revised Comprehensive Plan and supporting ordinances are in place. I understand that you have the legal authority to defer cases for as long as one year. I (we) also ask you to remember that adequate infrastructure provision in the Comprehensive Plan in our area has unique problems because we have the added resoonsibility of takino care of the Swift Creek Reservoir in all of our land uses. The drinking water in the Reservoir is for all of the public, not just the residents of the watershed. Signed~/<?~ OPTIONAL: ADDITIONAL COMMENTS ~ TO THE CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS: In case the Public Hearing for the Upper Swift Creek Comprehensive Plan revision does not come up on the schedule before other duties require me to leave, I would like to register my presence at the meeting tonight. NAME: Fe Rl\CtS-r CLA(~'f ADDRESS "3>s. IL.\ S 14 (~ II (l W Fe ~. D I If", ( "<: f'l\ I Pl\:. il \ I Iv"! V /? :<.'3,) } 'e.L) DATE August 22. 2007 I (we) ask you, in the name of responsible growth in Chesterfield County, to vote tonight to remand the Revision of the Comprehensive Plan in our area back to the Planning Commission to address serious issues that have not been resolved fairly for all stakeholders. I (we) also ask you to defer all zoning cases in the Swift Creek Watershed until the Revised Comprehensive Plan and supporting ordinances are in place. I understand that you have the legal authority to defer cases for as long as one year. I (we) also ask you to remember that adequate infrastructure provision in the Comprehensive Plan in our area has unique prOblems because we have the added resoonsibilitv of taking care of the Swift Creek Reservoir in all of our land uses. The drinking water in the Reservoir is for all of the public, not just the residents of the watershed. Signed ....J der-I/L,:;>"'-~t" ~f..,A.t'1" OPTIONAL: ADDITIONAL COMMENTS - TO THE CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS: In case the Public Hearing for the Upper Swift Creek Comprehensive Plan revision does not come up on the schedule before other duties require me to leave, I would like to register my presence at the meeting tonight. NAME: t\;~ tfwnh:,(..~ ~ ADDRESS 2;3''-1 Sh.['lllOV1.l~1 rril n~ " I ,,), n)1, J [,1(h {r:-i:.i U 11. G" :::>(L)...-; 'v DATE August 22. 2007 I (we) ask you, in the name of responsible growth in Chesterfield County, to vote tonight to remand the Revision of the Comprehensive Plan in our area back to the Planning Commission to address serious issues that have not been resolved fairly for all stakeholders. I (we) also ask you to defer all zoning cases in the Swift Creek Watershed until the Revised Comprehensive Plan and supporting ordinances are in place. I understand that you have the legal authority to defer cases for as long as one year. I (we) also ask you to remember that adequate infrastructure provision in the Comprehensive Plan in our area has unique problems because we have the added resDonsibility of taking care of the Swift Creek Reservoir in all of our land uses. The drinking water in the Reservoir is for all of the public, not just the residents of the watershed. Signed ~"l :t{;;' ,,(; ~ .'~."'" .f '..1:: .~ ....J .. r' f., OPTIONAL: ADDITIONAL COMMENTS ~ TO THE CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS: In case the Public Hearing for the Upper Swift Creek Comprehensive Plan revision does not come up on the schedule before other duties require me to leave, I would like to register my presence at the meeting tonight. NAME: eJ t2 Il L ~ f Vii 7? JC} 'I r / E t!J . - ADDRESS "32 o! ~jal/fTlVjMd 1./11 h?lffjp. ~ DATE August 22. 2007 I (we) ask you, in the name of responsible growth in Chesterfield County, to vote tonight to remand the Revision of the Comprehensive Plan in our area back to the Planning Commission to address serious issues that have not been resolved fairly for all stakeholders. I (we) also ask you to defer all zoning cases in the Swift Creek Watershed until the Revised Comprehensive Plan and supporting ordinances are in place. I understand that you have the legal authority to defer cases for as long as one year. I (we) also ask you to remember that adequate infrastructure provision in the Comprehensive Plan in our area has unique problems because we have the added responsibility of taking care of the Swift Creek Reservoir in all of our land uses. The drinking water in the Reservoir is for all of the public, not just the residents of the watershed. Signed OPTIONAL: ADDITIONAL COMMENTS ~ TO THE CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS: In case the Public Hearing for the Upper Swift Creek Comprehensive Plan revision does not come up on the schedule before other duties require me to leave, I would like to register my presence at the meeting tonight. NAME: J~ ShCM;;dZM ADDRESS 54 .~ :?' (~{''l+' ~, v'2,- ~iJ(\dl7€ bl\J'n C / \V\ \d \0 th~ a ~1, \jA. ~3 \\ 1... DATE August 22, 2007 I (we) ask you, in the name of responsible growth in Chesterfield County, to vote tonight to remand the Revision of the Comprehensive Plan in our area back to the Planning Commission to address serious issues that have not been resolved fairly for all stakeholders. I (we) also ask you to defer all zoning cases in the Swift Creek Watershed until the Revised Comprehensive Plan and supporting ordinances are in place. I understand that you have the legal authority to defer cases for as long as one year. I (we) also ask you to remember that adequate infrastructure provision in the Comprehensive Plan in our area has unique problems because we have the added responsibility of takina care of the Swift Creek Reservoir in all of our land uses. The drinking water in the Reservoir is for all of the public, not just the residents of the watershed. Signed ~' ['g- .,. J 9 1l4L; ~ lU~/-.,f,"" ,. c; r: () Z /2hC/7 OPTIONAL: ADDITIONAL COMMENTS - TO THE CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS: In case the Public Hearing for the Upper Swift Creek Comprehensive Plan revision does not come up on the schedule before other duties require me to leave, I would like to register my pre,nce at the meeting tonight. NAME: 1 h ~e (h ~v\ C -( IV'1 dt< .., ADDRESS-L/ D J... (l{ 1'\ r I :: fI.l$ 1J DATE August 22. 2007 I (we) ask you, in the name of responsible growth in Chesterfield County, to vote tonight to remand the Revision of the Comprehensive Plan in our area back to the Planning Commission to address serious issues that have not been resolved fairly for all stakeholders. I (we) also ask you to defer all zoning cases in the Swift Creek Watershed until the Revised Comprehensive Plan and supporting ordinances are in place. I understand that you have the legal authority to defer cases for as long as one year. I (we) also ask you to remember that adequate infrastructure provision in the Comprehensive Plan in our area has unique problems because we have the added responsibility of taking care of the Swift Creek Reservoir in all of our land uses. The drinking water in the Reservoir is for aI/ of the public, not just the residents of the watershed. Signed d-<//J, ~rz~L OPTIONAL: ADDITIONAL COMMENTS ~ TO THE CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS: In case the Public Hearing for the Upper Swift Creek Comprehensive Plan revision does not come up on the schedule before other duties require me to leave, I would like to register my presence at the meeting tonight. ", NAME: ,--,! IA.M . ~ .) ) A . ,. : .' I -- ADDRESS I. r '\ . ~ i ./t.11 I ( . / 4-.,...,!: , , j Vi; DATE August 22, 2007 I (we) ask you, in the name of responsible growth in Chesterfield County, to vote tonight to remand the Revision of the Comprehensive Plan in our area back to the Planning Commission to address serious issues that have not been resolved fairly for all stakeholders. I (we) also ask you to defer all zoning cases in the Swift Creek Watershed until the Revised Comprehensive Plan and supporting ordinances are in place. I understand that you have the legal authority to defer cases for as long as one year. I (we} also ask you to remember that adequate infrastructure provision in the Comprehensive Plan in our area has unique problems because we have the added resDonsibility of taking care of the Swift Creek Reservoir in all 9f our land uses. The drinking water in the Reservoir is for all of the Dub/ie, not just the residents of the watershed. Signed I ./". , /1"'/ "'-'-' OPTIONAL: ADDITIONAL COMMENTS ~ TO THE CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS: In case the Public Hearing for the Upper Swift Creek Comprehensive Plan revision does not come up on the schedule before other duties require me to leave, I would like to register my presence at the meeting tonight. NAME: E''Jr, /il/ A:',~ic/~-r; ADDRESS /~~C:) (;///:/; /. /, <. /// / ' . DATE August 22. 2007 I (we) ask you, in the name of responsible growth in Chesterfield County, to vote tonight to remand the Revision of the Comprehensive Plan in our area back to the Planning Commission to address serious issues that have not been resolved fairly for all stakeholders. I (we) also ask you to defer all zoning cases in the Swift Creek Watershed until the Revised Comprehensive Plan and supporting ordinances are in place. I understand that you have the legal authority to defer cases for as long as one year. I (we) also ask you to remember that adequate infrastructure provision in the Comprehensive Plan in our area has unique problems because we have the added resDonsibility of taking care of the Swift Creek Reservoir in all of our land uses. The drinking water in the Reservoir is for all of the public, not just the residents of the watershed. Signed /-~/ ~//'-', .. I / / -:,;;1"7 ' -7' .#? / ,. /' ,..<' .,..' f /'; ,,/'.'/' ,/. {jI \ ":u,,. t. //t-." OPTIONAL: ADDITIONAL COMMENTS - TO THE CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS: In case the Public Hearing for the Upper Swift Creek Comprehensive Plan revision does not come up on the schedule before other duties require me to leave, I would like to register my presence at the meeting tonight. NAME: J;., / ;' i'9 M / L e)/ ADDRESS 57&0 ##/Jt:?vf R'dye I?t /h~'~?Drh,R~ V~ ,..2:1'//<- DATE August 22. 2007 I (we) ask you, in the name of responsible growth in Chesterfield County, to vote tonight to remand the Revision of the Comprehensive Plan in our area back to the Planning Commission to address serious issues that have not been resolved fairly for all stakeholders. I (we) also ask you to defer all zoning cases in the Swift Creek Watershed until the Revised Comprehensive Plan and supporting ordinances are in place. I understand that you have the legal authority to defer cases for as long as one year. I (we) also ask you to remember that adequate infrastructure provision in the Comprehensive Plan in our area has unique problems because we have the added resoonsibilitv of taking care of the Swift Creek R~servoir in all of our land uses. The drinking water in the Reservoir is for all of the public, not just the residents of the watershed. Signed ~~~ OPTIONAL: ADDITIONAL COMMENTS ~ TO THE CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS: In case the Public Hearing for the Upper Swift Creek Comprehensive Plan revision does not come up on the schedule before other duties require me to leave, I would like to register my presence at the meeting tonight. NAME: -:pAul D /(;/~t ADDRESS 5" 700 /-If1'" J, "'" ,.. R i ~ ~ K,,( #,.J! loT:: hiA-<J U It- :n mOo DATE August 22. 2007 I (we) ask you, in the name of responsible growth in Chesterfield County, to vote tonight to remand the Revision of the Comprehensive Plan in our area back to the Planning Comm"ission to address serious issues that have not been resolved fairly for all stakeholders. I (we) also ask you to defer all zoning cases in the Swift Creek Watershed until the Revised Comprehensive Plan and supporting ordinances are in place. I understand that you have the legal authority to defer cases for as long as one year. I (we) also ask YOU to remember that adequate infrastructure provision in the Comprehensive Plan in our area has unique problems because we have the added responsibility of taking care of the Swift Creek Reservoir in all of our land uses. The drinking water in the Reservoir is for all of the public. not lust the residents of the watershed. Signed P..JftX4 OPTIONAL: ADDITIONAL COMMENTS - !:' .. Gb8S1erlield: Bbserver Your CommuniTY Nl'WJpapl'r Sinci' /995 P.O. Box 1616, Midlothian, Virginia 23113 . Phone: (804) 545-7500. Fax: (804) 744-3269 . Email: news@ehesterficldobservcr.eom . Internet: www.chesterficldobserver.eom ADVERTISING AFFIDAVIT Client Description Ad Size Cost (per issue) Chesterfield County Board Of Supervisors Upper Swift Creek 12 Page + 3" $685.00 The Observer, Inc. Publisher of CHESTERFIELD OBSERVER PUBLIC NOTICE Take notice that the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfidd County, Virginia, at a regular scheduled meeting on August 22, 2007, at 6:30 p.m. in the County Public Meeting Room at the Chesterfield Administration Building, Rl. 10 and Lori Road, Chesterfield Virginia, will hold a public hearing wher~ persons affected may appear and present their views to consider: This is to certify that the attached legal notice was published by Chesterfield Observer in the county of Chesterfield, state of Virginia, on the following date(s): 8/08/2007 & 8/15/2007 Sworn to and subscribed before me this /5+h day of ATTACH AD HERE ALl9Lts+- ,2007. Q?dv~i; My commission expires: November 30,2010 Commission LD. 7040138 ~ RtM\((~n&u- 'lS ~~ THIS IS NOT A BILL. PLEASE PAY FROM INVOICE. THANK YOU. '11f "SI'''' - Aug. 15,2007 - page 23 Comprehensive Plan Amendments: The Upper Swift Creek Plan amendment, an amendment to The Upper Swift Creek Plan and the Thoroughfare Plan, parts of The Plan For Chesterfield. After a public hearing, the Board may make changes to the proposed Plan. The Upper Swift Creek Plan amendment area is generally bounded to the north by properties along Midlothian Turnpike, County Line Road, Mount Hermon Road, Old Hundred Road, Otterdale Road, Charter Colony Parkway, Route 288 and Lucks Lane; to the south by properties along Hull Street Road, Baldwin Creek Road, Beach Road, West Hensley Road, Spring Run Road and Bailey Bridge Road; to the east by properties along Route 288; and to the west by properties along Moseley Road, Genito Road and the Chesterfield County/ Powhatan County boundary. The Upper Swift Creek Plan amendment, if adopted by the Board of Supervisors, will become part of The Plan for Chesterfield, the County's comprehensive plan. The Plan for Chesterfield is used by County citizens, staff. the Planning Commission and Board of Supervisors as a guide for future decisions affecting the County including, but not limited to, decisions regarding future land use, road networks and zoning actions. Once the Upper Swift Creek Plan amendment is adopted, it will replace most of the Upper Swift Creek Plan (adopted in 1991 and amended in 2000). The majority of the Plan area is contained within the Matoaca Magisterial District, with small portions of the Plan area located in the Clover Hill and Midlothian Magisterial Districts. The Plan does not rewne land, but suggests Ordinance amendments and other actions. The Upper Swift Creek Plan amendment is an update and a refinement of the current adopted Upper Swift Creek Plan. Major land use recommendations include: a deferred growth area in the westernmost portion of the Plan geography; regional mixed uses and employment center uses adjacent to existing and anticipated major interchanges; community mixed uses at existing and anticipated arterial road intersections; employment center uses, regional mixed uses; general business mixed uses, community mixed uses and office/residential mixed uses along Route 360; conservation/recreation uses along area streams; residential uses of 2.0 units per acre or less for other areas of the Plan geography that drain to Swift Creek Reservoir; and residential uses of 2.2 units per acre or less for other areas that drain away from the reservoir. eIIuI,mt" Ob.tn'F - Aug. 15, 2007 ' from LE~ALNOTICES,page 23 Other major recommendations inclu,de: ordinance amendments to prohibit expansion of public water and wastewater systems for uses within the deferred gro~ area' ordinance amendments to reqUire man'datory connection to the public water and wastewater systems for most types of development outside the deferred gro~ area; consideration of varIOus clus!enng, conservation/subdivision, tra~ll1o~al neighborhood design and rural resldenl1al subdivision options as new orc;Unance categories; encouraging new resld~n~lal zoning with sole access through an eXlstmg or planned subdivision to meet or e~ceed the average lot size of, and hav~ a density ~~ual to or less than, the existmg subdlVlslOn; encouraging preservation .of historic structures and sites by allowmg adapl1ve reuse' ordinance amendments to increase buffe;ing along arterial roads in order to ensure that new residential develop~ents along forested corridors preserve eXlst~ng forested vistas adjacent to, but outSide the ultimate rights of way, of area ro~ds; identification of conservation/recreal1on corridors; discouraging residential and retail commercial development, oth~r th~ retail and service uses that serve pnmarily surrounding employment center uses, from employment generating areas; encourage higher density and office uses between lower density resldenl1al deve~opment and commercial and higher mtenslty employment generating uses. Transportation recommendations inc~ude: (1) increasing the recommended nght- of-way width on the f.roposed North/ South Major Arterial ( Woolndge Road Extended") between Route 288 and the proposed East/West Major Arterial just south of Powhite Parkway Extended, from 90 to 120 feet; (2) increasing the recommended right-of-way width on the proposed East/West Major Arterial north of Hull Street Road, connecting Otterdale Road and a large planned development (Magnolia Green), from 70 to ,90 feet; (3) decreasing the recommended nght-of-way width of Watermill Parkway, from 90 to 70 feet; (4) deleting the proposed interchange on Route 288 south of the Gemto Road overpass, and. the ~ast/West Major Arterial connecting the mterchange to Old Hundred Road to the west, and to Warbro Road to the east; (5) deleting Hensley Road between Spring Run Road and Springford Parkway; (6) deleting the proposed East/ West Collector connecting Otterdale Road with Fox Club Parkway; (7) deleting the proposed East/West Major Arte~ial connecting Winterpock Road to Sprmg Run Road just south of Hull Street Road, and replacing it by adding McEnnally R~ad between Winterpock Road and Spnng Run Road as a 90 foot Major Arterial; (8) deleting the proposed North/South Major Arterial that extends west from Otterdale Road north of Genito Road, crosses Powhite Parkway Extended, and connects to the proposed East/West Major Arterial; (9) realigning the western sectIOn of the proposed East/West Major Arterial that currently aligns with Lacy Farm Road to the north, closer to the Norfolk Southern railroad line; (10) realigning Powhite Parkway Extended and the proposed interchange in the Genito Road area; (11) realigning the intersection of the eastern end of Mount Hermon Road with the proposed North/South Major ~rterial; (1.2) realigning the East/West Major Artenal connecting Otterdale Road Extended WIth Winterpock Road further to the north, and deleting the southern se~tion ~f the North! South Arterial connectmg thiS road WIth Beach Road; (13) realigning Mount Hermon Road north of Genito Road, and Mount Hermon Road Extended south of Genito Road; (14) changes in the road network based on Magnolia Green development that include; (a) adding a proposed 70 foot North/South Collector connecting Duval Road west of Otterdale Road with the {'roposed East/West Arterial to the north; (b) shifting the alignment of the ~roposed Powhite Parkway; (c) relocating the proposed interchange on ?uval ~oad to the proposed east/west major artenal.an~; (d) realigning other planned roads Wlthm Magnolia Green; (15) adding Ledo Road as a 70 foot Collector; (16) providing cul- de-sacs on Otterdale Road at the Powhite Parkway Extension. Other transpo~at~on recommendations include: (1) contmUlng zoning and development review practices that encourage development proposals to conform to the Thoroughfare Plan with respect to the construction. of road improvements and !he. dedlcat~on Jllliij;; :;: acre per rear. Vested developments would not be lItfected. projected to rt:suh in"1uture development that will have less of a water quality impact than the current Upper Swift Creek Plan (adopted in 1991 and amended in 2000); protect and preserve critical natural systems and areas within the Upper Swift Creek watershed by; (1) maintaining GIS layers identifying the location of critical systems (2) evaluating these systems and identifying those that are more critical for water protection or would benefit from rehabilitation and (3) mitigating for loss of resources within the watershed where impacts occur; developing measures to ensure that new development reduces the impacts to wetlands and streams and that the day-to-day activities of both residential and commercial uses lessen their impact on the important resources; improve, restore and prevent further degradation of those resources that are already degraded by actively pursuing compensatory mitigation projects for streams and wetlands, by funding stream and wetland restoration, and by directing funds and potential grant funding to buffer areas where water quality would benefit the most from buffer enhancement; maintaining biological and habitat diversity by promoting habitat connectivity and by protecting undisturbed land corridors between watersheds and sub-watersheds within the Swift Creek Reservoir Watershed through preservation of natural areas within and between residential developments to help maintain connectivity, and by developing and implementing educational efforts and enhancement of stewardship conservational roles on the part of the homeowners to help the county promote natural diversity and maintain connectivity of habitats; minimizing stormwater runoff through construction site design and site control by (1) implementing and enforcing of erosion and sediment controls (2) developing additional measures that exceed the state minimum standards for development, to include VDOT road projects, to ensure protection of water quality when a project is near or adjacent to sensitive resource features or water bodies and (3) monitoring watershed tributaries during storm flows to assess the need for additional measures; minimize the environmental impact of improvements by promoting and encouraging new development standards for new development and redevelopment, such as Low Impact Development (LID), new bioretention, stormwater infiltration, stormwater treatment, and site design practices, minimizing clearing and grading, site designs and containment structures that allow for pollution prevention and spill contingency, remediation or interception of Iollutants, and tree save, preservation an planting strategies; promoting citizen's group participation and education to aid in the protection of the Swift Creek Watershed by developing and distributing educational information and by sponsoring local watershed clean-up initiatives; promoting waters~ed awareness and stewardship of reSidents, community associations, businesses and visitors through education programs, recreational opportunities, and participatory watershed activities. The revised Plan amendment also provides that commercial uses are appropriate for properties located on the south side of Route 360 between Route 288 and Winterpock Road between the AT&T Easement and Route 360 provided there is a buffer between commercial and residential uses. The revised Plan amendment also ;n....l"JP-"!' !"Irf"tvi~inn-.: !"p1MinfJ to lpvpl of Ayyoehtted OfdinmceAmendmentJ: An ordinance to amend the Code of the County of Chesterfield, 1997, as amended, by amending and re-enacting Sections 19-520, 19-522 and 19-523 of the Zoning O~dinance relating to buffers. Specifically, this amendment would: (i) include preservation of existing forested vistas adjacent to arterial roads within the stated purpose and intent of buffer requirements, (ii) establish a 200-foot buffer requirement category consisting of an unbroken strip of open space planted at three times the density of perimeter landscaping "C" of the Zoning Ordinance and (iii) establish within the Zoning Ordinance separate standards for the width of required buffers adjacent to streets for Residential (R) and Residential Town House (R- TH) zoned properties. These proposed street buffer standards are equal to the current standards of the Subdivision Ordinance, except that within the Upper Swift Creek Plan Area the 200 foot buffer will be required along arterial streets for R and R- TH properties. An ordinance to amend the Code of the County of Chesterfield, 1997, as amended, by amending and re-enacting Sections 17-62, 17-70 and 17-83 of the Subdivision Ordinance relating to buffers within the Upper Swift Creek Plan amendment geography. Specifically, this amendment would establish in the Subdivision Ordinance a 200-foot buffer requirement along arterial streets, as described in the p~op,osed ordinance amendments above, WIthm the geography of the Upper Swift Creek Plan amendment area and, also, would allow for certain utility and other easements to run parallel within the buffer under certain conditions. An ordinance to amend the Code of the County of Chesterfield, 1997, as amended, by amending and re-enacting Sections 17- 72 and 17-84 of the Subdivision Ordinance and Sections 18-63 and 18-64 of the Utility Ordinance relating to mandatory sewer and water connections within portions of the Upper Swift Creek Plan amendment geography. Specifically, this amendment would require connection to the county's water and wastewater supply systems when. with certain exceptions, a lot or structure is located within Upper Swift Creek Plan amendment geography and suggested for any use other than Deferred Growth. An ordinance to amend the Code of the County of Chesterfield, 1997, as amended. by enacting Sections 17-72.1 of the Subdivision Ordinance and Sections 18- 64.1 and 18-64.2 of the Utility Ordinance relating to utilities within portions of the Upper Swift Creek Plan amendment geography. Specifically, for structures located within the Upper Swift Creek Plan amendment geography and suggested for Deferred Growth, these amendments would prohibit connection to (i) the county's. water and wastewater supply systems, (ii) any non-governmental public water and wastewater systems, (iii) any private water supply system designed to serve more than one lot and (iv) any private wastewater supply system designed to serve more than one lot. An ordinance to amend the Code of the County of Chesterfield, 1997, as amended, by amending and re-enacting Section 19- 238 of the Zoning Ordinance relating to water quality in the Upper Swift Creek Watershed. Specifically, this amendment would require that the post-development For further information, contact Jimmy Bowling at 748-1086 or bowlingj@ chesterfield.gov. For information about water quality proposals. contact Dick McElfish at 748-1038. Discussion may include all of the recommendations listed above. After the public hearing, appropriate changes or corrections may be made to the proposed amendments. Copies of the above proposals and related information are on file in the County Administrator's Office (Room 505) at the Chesterfield County Administration Building and in the Planning Department at the Chesterfield County Community Development Building. 9800 Government Center Parkway (I" Floor), Chesterfield, Vuginia, for public examination between the hours of 8:30 a. m. and 5:00 p. m. of each regular business day. Detailed information is available in the Planning Department and on the Planning Department Internet site. The hearing is held at a - public facility designed to be accessible to persons with disabilities. Any persons with questions on the accessibility of the facility or need for reasonable accommodations should contact Lisa Elko, Clerk to the board, at 748-1200. Persons needinll interpreter services for the deaf must notity the Clerk to the Board no later than Friday, August 17,2007. IJ-~ ,~ ~I. I I :: M~~}t~ CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of l-a Meeting Date: August 22, 2007 Item Number: 16.C. Subiect: Public Hearing to Consider an Ordinance to Establish the ~Knollwood Drive Water Assessment District" County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: ff1 Board Action Reauested: Staff requests that the Board of Supervisors adopt the attached ordinance to establish the "Knollwood Drive Water Assessment District", appropriate funds in the amount of $166,300.00 for the project from the water fund balance, and set the interest rate based on the index of average yield on United States Treasury securities adjusted to a constant maturity of one year as made available by the Federal Reserve Bank at the time the assessment ordinance is adopted. Summary of Information: Several property owners on Knollwood Drive! in the Bon Air Terrace subdivision! in the Midlothian District! have approached the County with a request to have the public water system extended to serve the existing homes on a portion of Knollwood Drive. Those property owners have requested that a twenty-two (22) lot assessment district be established to fund the necessary water line extension. A boundary map and vicinity map of the proposed water assessment district is attached. If an assessment district is created! the County will initially pay all engineering, easement acquisition, construction and other costs to extend public water lines and will then recoup the cost from the property owners. The water assessment on each lot may be repaid in a lump sum or over a 20- year period in semi-annual installments. The property owners will also pay interest at a rate which will be the index of average yield on United States Treasury securities adjusted to a constant maturity of one year as made Preparer: William O. WriQht . Yes Title: Assistant Director of Utilities Attachments: DNO # 000366 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 2 of.:a available by the Federal Reserve Bank at the time the assessment ordinance is adopted. Property owners aged 65 years or older, who live on their property, may have their assessment payments deferred until they no longer own the property. A lien in the total amount of the assessment for each property will be recorded. The total estimated cost for the proposed water line extension is $166,300.00. The proposed ~Knollwood Drive Water Assessment District" would include twenty-two (22) lots, with the assessment per lot being $7,559.10. The Utilities Department has received signed survey forms from the owners of twenty (20) properties indicating their support, which represents 91% of the properties to be included in the proposed assessment district. A list of the property owners and assessments is attached. 000367 U-~' , - -, --. -~' ; ~~ CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 3 of 3 Meeting Date: August 22,2007 Budaet and Manaaement Comments: This agenda item requests that the Board hold a public hearing to consider an ordinance to establish the Knollwood Drive Water Assessment District. This item also requests that the Board authorize the appropriation of funds in the amount of $166 ,300.00 for the water line extension proj ect and set an interest rate at the index of average yield on United States Treasury Securities adjusted to a constant maturity of one year as made available by the Federal Reserve Bank at the time the assessment ordinance is adopted. Funding in the amount of $166,300.00 is available in the water fund balance to appropriate to the water line extension project. Preparer: Allan M. Carmody Title: Director, Budaet and Manaaement 000368 AN ORDINANCE CREATING THE KNOLL WOOD DRIVE SPECIAL TAX OR ASSESSMENT WATER DISTRICT, IMPOSING ASSESSMENT AGAINST LAND OWNERS IN THE DISTRICT AND PROVIDING FOR SUSPENSION OF PAYMENT FOR CERTAIN ELDERLY OWNERS BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County: (1) follows: That the Knollwood Drive Special Tax or Assessment Water District is created as Section 1. Definitions. In the context of this ordinance, the following words shall have the following meaning: District: Knollwood Drive Special Tax or Assessment Water District. Map of the District: The map entitled "Knollwood Drive Water Assessment District" prepared by the County Department of Utilities, which map is on file with the director of utilities. Section 2. Establishment of the Knollwood Drive Special Tax or Assessment Water District. Pursuant to Code of Virginia, Section 15.2-2404 et seq., there is hereby created in the county the Knollwood Drive Special Tax or Assessment Water District. The area of the district shall be and the same is hereby fixed within the boundaries depicted on the map of the district. Section 3. Construction of certain water facilities in and adjacent to the district. The utilities department shall cause to be constructed in and adjacent to the district the water line and appurtenant facilities depicted on the map of the district. Section 4. Taxes or assessments upon owners of property located within the district. The cost of construction of the water line and appurtenant facilities located within the district shall be apportioned among the owners of property abutting the water line. The amount of the tax or assessment charged to each such owner shall be one twenty-second (1/22) of the total cost of the improvements constructed within the district, including the legal, financial and other directly attributable costs incurred by the County. The one twenty-second (1/22) charge shall be assessed against each lot located in the district. The amount finally taxed or assessed against each landowner shall be reported to the treasurer as soon as practicable after completion 0500:75757.1 1 000369 of the water line and appurtenant facilities located within the district, and the treasurer shall enter the same as provided for other taxes. Section 5. Installment payment of assessments. Any person against whom an assessment provided for in this article has been finally made shall pay the full amount of the assessment provided for in this article, on the due date of the first tax bill on which such assessment is shown. In no event, however, shall any part of the assessment be due prior to the completion of the water line and appurtenant facilities constructed pursuant to this article. As an alternative to payment as provided above, a person against whom an assessment provided for in this article has been made may pay such assessment in forty (40) equal semiannual principal installments over a period of twenty (20) years, together with simple interest on the unpaid principal balance at an annual rate equal to the index of average yield on United States Treasury Securities adjusted to a constant maturity of one year as made available by the Federal Reserve Bank on the date when this ordinance was adopted. The first of such installments shall be due on and interest on the unpaid principal balance shall accrue from the date on which the full amount of the assessment would otherwise have been due as provided above. Section 6. Suspension of payment of assessments. Payment of assessments otherwise due under this ordinance shall be suspended for any owner who owned property on the day the ordinance creating the assessment district was adopted and who occupies a residential building located on the property and is 65 years of age or older. However when the property is no longer occupied by a person who is 65 years of age or older or is conveyed to another person or persons, irrespective of the age of the person or persons to whom the property is conveyed, the suspension of payments shall cease and the entire assessment, including accrued interest, shall be immediately due and payable. It shall be the obligation of any such owner to provide a driver's license or other photo identification establishing proof of age satisfactory to the director of utilities in order for such suspension to become effective. Section 7. This ordinance shall not be set out in the County Code but shall be kept on file in the office of the director of utilities. (2) This ordinance shall be in effect immediately upon its adoption. 0500:75757.1 2 000370 ProDosed "Knollwood Drive Water Assessment District" Owner na me ProDertv Address GPIN Assessment Vicheth K. Yuan and S.C. Miem 1306 Knollwood Drive 747-711-1872 $7,559.10 Hiroko O. Tomlinson 1312 Knollwood Drive 747-711-2180 $7,559.10 Henry and Nina P. Overby, Jr. 1313 Knollwoad Drive 747-711-4169 $7,559.10 Katherine E. Smith 1318 Knollwood Drive 747-711-2586 $7,559.10 Osman Cedilla Diaz 1400 Knollwood Drive 747-711-2993 $7,559.10 Ronald A. and Joyce T. Clark 1401 Knollwood Drive 747-711-5182 $7,559.10 James E. and Carolyn M. Collins 1406 Knollwood Drive 747-712-3300 $7,559.10 Louise Smith Farmer 1407 Knollwood Drive 747-711-5489 $7,559.10 William A. Keirn 1412 Knollwood Drive 747-712-3707 $7,559.10 Albert 5. and Phyllis D. McIntire 1413 Knollwood Drive 747-711-5797 $7,559.10 J. Carol Whitmore 1418 Knollwood Drive 747-712-4015 $7,559.10 Ashok Bhaisora 1419 Knollwood Drive 747-712-6204 $7,559.10 Vicky C. Worsham 1500 Knollwood Drive 747-712-4627 $7,559.10 Lafayette Investors LLC 1501 Knollwood Drive 747-712-6915 $7,559.10 Maurice Rhett Costello 1506 Knollwood Drive 747-712-5133 $7,559.10 Timothy E. and Tina E. Haskins 1507 Knollwood Drive 747-712-7223 $7,559.10 Elizabeth B Unroe 1512 Knollwood Drive 747-712-5540 $7,559.10 Marian A. Knowles 1513 Knollwood Drive 747-712-7630 $7,559.10 Susan E. Murphy (see Note 1) 1518 Knollwood Drive 747-712-5848 $7,559.10 1600 Knollwood Drive 747-712-6255 Eva 5. Burd 1612 Knollwood Drive 747-712-6969 $7,559.10 Robert A. and Brenda S. Brandau 1615 Knollwood Drive 747-712-9057 $7,559.10 Robbie and Trina Sutherland 1616 Knollwood Drive 747-712-6662 $7,559.10 (Note 1: This property owners' house encumbers both lots, as it straddles the common property line. The Utilities Department has considered this as a "single lot" in setting up the assessment district. The County tax assessment for 1518 Knollwood Drive is for the house and that lot. The tax assessment for 1600 Knollwood Drive is for that lot only.) 000371. '- , . \.1. ' August 14, 2007 t Chesterfield CoUnty Utilities Department POBox 608 Chesterfield, Virginia 23832-9998 Dear Mr. Phelps: I would like to take this opportunity to express my appreciation to Chesterfield County for helping the property owners on Knollwood Drive take positive steps in obtaining public water supplies. My wife, Carolyn, and I purchased our house at 1406 Knollwood Drive from her father in the 2003 timeframe. Her father purchased the home from the builder in the 1950s, and some member of her family had always lived in the house. During our remodeling project we were reminded of the occasional water problems experienced during drought conditions. In addition, we had an abandoned oil tank that was close to the well removed, although water samples indicated the well water was safe. We are convinced the accessibility of public water enhances our property and we look forward to connecting to the supply. Again thank you, and if we can provide additional information to support this special tax district please do not hesitate to contact us. Sincerely, Cc: Mr. Kelly E. Miller, Chairman, Chesterfield Board of Supervisors Mr. Donald D. Sowder, Midlothian District Supervisor 11800 FIRCREST PLACE. MIDLOTHIAN, VIRGINIA. 23113 ~ Bhesledield' Observer- Your Community Ni'w.lpapa Sinei' /995 P.O. Box 1616. Midlothian. Virginia 23113. Phone: (804) 545-7500. Fax: (804) 744-3269. Email: news@chcstetficldobscrver.com. Intemct: www.chcstcrficlclobscrvcr.t'om ADVERTISING AFFIDAVIT Client Chesterfield County Board Of Supervisors TAKE NOTICE Take notice that the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County. Virginia, at a regular meeting on August 22, 2007. commencing at 6:30 p.m.. in the Public Meeting Room at Chesterfield Courthouse, Chesterfield, Virginia. will hold a public hearing to consider the enactment, pursuant to ~15.2-2404, et. seq., Code of Virginia, 1950. as amended. of an ordinance to establish the Knollwood Drive Special Tax or Assessment Water District, to construct certain water facilities therein, and to impose certain taxes or assessments upon the owners of property located therein. The proposed ordinance provides for the creation of the Knollwood Drive Special Tax or Assessment Water District. which contains twenty-two (22) residential lots on Knollwood Drive in the Midlothian Magisterial District. The District is depicted on the Map of the District referred to below. The ordinance further provides for the construction of certain water facilities within the District. and for the imposition of certain taxes or assessments upon the owners of the property located within the District to fund the cost of constructing such water facilities. Enactment of this ordinance will result in special taxes or assessments against the owners of property located in the District. A list of the owners of property located in the District and of the amount of the special tax or assessment to be made against each owner is set forth below. Landowners may appear at the public hearing and, if they wish. show cause against the assessment. Copies of the ordinance and Map of the District are available for public viewing between 8:30 a.m. and 5:00 p.m.. Monday through Friday. in the Chesterfield County Administrator's Office. ROPOSED "KNOLLWOOD DRIVE WATER ASSESSMENT DISTRICT" Description Ad Size Cost (per issue ) Knollwood Dr 1 co!. x 13" $520.00 The Observer, Inc. Publisher of CHESTERFIELD OBSERVER This is to certify that the attached legal notice was published by Chesterfield Observer in the county of Chesterfield, state of Virginia, on the following date(s): 8/08/2007 & 8/15/2007 Sworn to and subscribed before me this /5+h day of AL9-6-+ ,2007. tJ) dJJ;;;i Legal Affiant My commission expires: November 30,2010 Commission LD. 7040138 (SEAL) _",I1U,..,_, ",,~'~ L. (""J11/ ...,' ..,~ ........ . ~ ", ~ .v .", 1"\ N W J: :". .-0 ",., :/ :'5rl' ~~v ~<"" 0 ~ 1.::.0. ~ ~.. ~ f~.-:':o :t~ ~ ~f;'" : U Or -:: ,~..... : : : f. . " ... i % . ..... 1,;) ..\\~.'" ,. i ~ ~ I ~ ,t V ~ ~';, '0.,.......... ~ .....' ::;"'j ARY ~'V ,~\\" .11,1.,1,...",.",'''.... THIS IS NOT A BILL. PLEASE PAY FROM INVOICE. THANK you. -*~N1uI~ t\W~ _ Owner Name/Tax ID Property Address Assessment Vicfieth K. Yuon and S. C. Miem 747711187200000 1306 Knollwood Drive $7,559.10 Hiroko O. Tomlinson 747711218000000 1312 Knollwood Drive $7,559.10 Henry and Nina P. Overby, Jr. 747711416900000 1313 Knollwood Drive $7,559.10 Katharine E. Smith 747711258600000 1318 Knollwood Drive $7,559.10 Osman Cedilla Diaz . 747711299300000 1400 Knollwood Drive $7,559.10 Ronald A and Joyce T. Clark 747711518200000 1401 Knollwood Drive $7,559.10 James E. and Carolyn M. Collins 747712330000000 1406 Knollwood Drive $7,559.10 Louise Smilth Farmer 747711548900000 1407 Knollwood Drive $7,559.10 William A. Keirn 747712370700000 1412 Knollwood Drive $7.559.10 Albert S. and Phyllis D. McIntire 747711579700000 1413 Knollwood Drive $7,559.10 J. Carol Whitmore 747712401500000 1418 Knollwood Drive $7.559.10 Ashok Bhaisora . 747712620400000 1419 Knollwood Drive $7,559.10 Vicky C. Worsham 747712462700000 1500 Knollwood Drive $7.559.10 Lafayette Investors LLC 747712691500000 1501 Knollw"od Drive $7.559.10 Maurice Rhett Costello 747712513300000 1506 Knollwood Drive $7,559.10 Timothy E. and Tina E. Haskins 747712722300000 1507 Knollwood Drive $7,559.10 Elizabeth B. Unroe 747712554000000 1512 Knollwood Drive $7,559.10 Marian A. Knowles 747712763000000 -1513 Knollwood Drive $7,559.10 Susan E. Murphy 747712584800000 747712625500000 1518 Knollwood Drive 1600 Knollwood Drive $7,559.10 Eva S. Burd 747712696900000 1612 Knollwood Drive $7,559.10 Robert A. and Brenda S. Brandau 747712905700000 1615 Knollwood Drive $7,559.10 Robbie and Trina Sutherland 747712666200000 1616 Knollwood Drive $7,559.10 . CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 2 Meeting Date: August 22,2007 Item Number: 16.0. Subiect: Public Hearing to Consider Amending Section 9-132 of the Chesterfield County Code Relating to the Collection of Fees for Courthouse Security County Administrator's CDt1r1ments: County Administrator: \JD o Board Action Reauested: Public hearing to consider amendments to Section 9-132 of the Chesterfield County Code relating to the collection of fees for courthouse security. Summary of Information: The current County ordinance imposes a $5.00 fee in each criminal and traffic case when a defendant is convicted of a violation of any statute or ordinance. Under State law, the fees collected are remitted to the County Treasurer and must be appropriated by the Board to the Sheriff's Office for funding courthouse security personnel, and, upon request of the Sheriff, equipment and other personal property used in connection with courthouse security. The 2007 General Assembly amended the State Code to allow an increase of this fee to $10.00. The Sheriff's Office supports the proposed increase in the fee to $10.00 to further enhance its efforts to provide courthouse security. On June 27, 2007, the Board voted to hold a public hearing to consider amendments to the County Code reflecting the fee increase. A copy of the proposed ordinance is attached. Preparer: Steven L. Micas Title: County Attornev 1305:76064.1(75980.1) Attachments: . Yes DNO # 000374 AN ORDWANCE TO AMEND THE CODE OF THE COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD, 1997, AS AMENDED, BY AMENDWG AND RE-ENACTWG SECTION 9-132 RELATWG TO THE COLLECTION OF FEES FOR COURTHOUSE SECURITY BE IT ORDAWED by the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County: (1) That Section 9-132 of the Code of the County of Chesterfield 1997; as amended, is amended and re-enacted to read as follows: Sec. 9-132. Collection of processing fees for persons admitted to jail following conviction and fees for courthouse security. (a) (1) In addition to any other fees prescribed by law, a $25.00 processing fee is hereby imposed on every individual admitted to the county or regional jail following conviction in a district or circuit court. (2) This processing fee shall be ordered as a part of court costs collected by the clerk, deposited into the account of the county treasurer, and shall be appropriated to the sheriff to defray the costs of processing arrested persons into the jail. (b) (1) In addition to any other fees prescribed by law, a fee of ~ $10.00 is hereby imposed in each criminal and traffic case in which the defendant is convicted of a violation of any statute or ordinance. The clerks of the district and circuit courts shall charge and collect this fee as a part of the fees taxed as costs. (2) After collection by the clerk of the court in which the case is heard, the fee shall be remitted to the county treasurer and held subject to appropriation bv the county treasurer to be appropriated by the board of supervisors to the sheriffs office for funding courthouse security personnel, and, if requested by the sheriff, equipment and other personal property used in connection with courthouse security. (2) That this ordinance shall become effective immediately upon adoption. 000375 1305:75980.1 Cb..dield' Observer Your Community NeIV.\/Japl'T Since /995 P.O. Box 1616, Midlothian. Virginia 23113 . Phone: (804) 545-7500 . Fax: (804) 744-3269 . Email: news@chesterficldobserver.eorn . Internet: www.chesterlieldobserver.com ADVERTISING AFFIDAVIT Client Chesterfield County Board Of Supervisors TAKE NOTICE Take notice that the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County, Virginia. at a regular scheduled meeting on August 22, 2007, at 6:30 p.m. in the County Public Meeting Room at the Chesterfield Administration Building, Rt. 10 and Lori Road, Chesterfield, Virginia. will hold a public hearing where per~on.s affected may appear and present theIr VIews to consider: An ordinance to amend the Code of the County of.Chesterfield. 1997, as amended, by amen?ing and re-enacting Section 9- 132 relating to the collection of fees for cour00use sec~rity. After the public heanng, appropnate changes or corrections may be made to the ordinance. A copy of the ordinance is on file in the County Administrator's Office and the Clerk to the Board's Office (Room 504) at the <::hesterfield County Administration Buil~g.. Chesterfield, VIrginia. for fublic examInatIon between the hours 0 8:30 ~.m. and 5:00 p.m. If further information IS needed. please contact the County . Attomer's Office at 748-1491 between the hours 0 8:30 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. 1h~ hearing is held at a public facility deSl~~ to be accessible to persons with disabilltie~. ~y persons with questions on the accessIbilIty of the facility or need for r~asonable accommodations should contact LIsa Elko. Clerk to the board, at 748-1200. Persons needin~ interpreter services for the deaf must notity the Clerk to the Board no later than Friday, August 17,2007 Description Ad Size Cost (per issue) Court fees $114.40 1 col x 4.5" The Observer, Inc. Publisher of CHESTERFIELD OBSERVER This is to certify that the attached legal notice was published by Chesterfield Observer in the county of Chesterfield, state of Virginia, on the following date(s): 8/08/2007 & 8/15/2007 Sworn to and subscribed before me this IS+h day of ALtpST ,2007. dJ d ;;d/;:$ . Legal Affiant My commission expires: November 30,2010 Commission J.D. 7040138 (SEAL) ,.,,\11"11' II III :\", I\. L I", . ,"...\.,. ../ '" /.... ~,' ..'"~'" .,...... '\.". "" . ~ J~~ or lll"'. V.A' I ~ ~ .'~\.P\rt "t:" o. .....-:. ~O..T-. ~v ~.. _ ~ i ~~ ...~ (.A... 0; 'i~:O ~-: z : 0 0" ::s:. ': :: ... . .- ~ \ : I ." . . " ,~ ... J", \~....; '- .', ..-... , '" " .-. , " VJ-. ......... ~v ...' ::..'"" 04 Ry ~\) ",.", '".''''')!.H''~ -'ii' THIS IS NOT A BILL. PLEASE PAY FROM INVOICE. THANK YOU. e ~~ CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 2 Meeting Date: August 22,2007 Item Number: 16.E. Subiect: Public Hearing to Consider Amendments to Chesterfield County Code Section 14-9 Relating to Carrying Loaded Firearms on Public Highways and Providing for a Penalty County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Qt () Board Action Reauested: Public hearing to consider amendments to Section 14-9 of the Chesterfield County Code relating to carrying loaded firearms on public highways and providing for penalty. Summary of Information: The current County ordinance regulates the carrying of loaded firearms while standing or walking on any part of a public highway when the person is not authorized to hunt on the private property on both sides of the highway. The ordinance also provides certain exemptions from its provisions. The 2007 General Assembly amended the State enabling legislation to restrict the County's ability to regulate this activity. The County now has the authority to regulate only when the person is carrying the loaded firearm for purposes of hunting. Also, the State Code provides specific exemptions for persons carrying loaded firearms in moving vehicles and for citizens acting at the time in defense of persons or property. Preparer: Steven L. Micas Title: County Attornev 1305:76063.1(75981.1) Attachments: . Yes DNO # 000376 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 2 of 2 On June 27 I 2007 I the Board voted to hold a public hearing to consider amendments to the County Code reflecting the changes made to the State Code. The proposed ordinance incorporates the requirements of the State Code and must be adopted if the County wants to continue to regulate this activity. A copy of the proposed ordinance is attached. 1305:76063.1(75981.1) 000377 AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE CODE OF THE COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD, 1997, AS AMENDED, BY AMENDING AND RE-ENACTING SECTION 14-9 RELATING TO CARRYING LOADED FIREARMS ON PUBLIC HIGHWAYS AND PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County: (1) That Section 14-9 of the Code of the County of Chesterfield, 1997, as amended, is amended and re-enacted to read asfollows: Sec. 14-9. Same--Carrying loaded firearms on public highways. (a) No person shall carry or have a loaded firearm in his possession~ for the purpose of hunting~ while standing or walking on any part of a public highway within the county when such person is not authorized to hunt on the private property on both sides of the highway along which he is standing or walking. The provisions of this section shall not apply to (i) persons carrying loaded firearms in moving vehicles; (ii) persons acting at the time in defense of persons or property; or (iii) persons carrying firearms as permitted pursuant to the pro'lisions of Code of'lirginia, SS 18~2 287~1 and 18.2 308.1 persons carrying loaded firearms for purposes other than hunting. (b) Any person violating the provisions of this section shall be guilty of a misdemeanor punishable by a fine of not more than $100.00. (2) That this ordinance shall become effective immediately upon adoption. 1305:75981.1 000378 GhBSl.llield Observer -- ~ Your Community Nl'lrs/m{Jer Since 1995 P.O. Box 1616, Midlothian, Virginia 23113 . Phone: (804) 545-7500. Fax: (804) 744-3269' Ernail: news@chestertieldobserv.:r.com . Internet: www.l"hesterticldobserver.com ADVERTISING AFFIDAVIT Client Chesterfield County Board Of Supervisors TAKE NOTICE Take notice that the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County, Vuginia, at a regular scheduled meeting on August 22, 2007, at 6:30 p.m. in the County Public Meeting Room at the Chesterfield Administration Building, Rt. 10 and Lori Road, Chesterfield, Vrrginia, will hold a public hearing where persons affected may appear and present their views to consider: An ordinance to amend the Code of the County of Chesterfield, 1997, as amended, by amending and re-enacting Section 14-9 relating to carrying loaded firearms on public highways and providing for a penalty. After the public hearing, appropriate changes or corrections may be made to the ordinance. A copy of the ordinance is on file in the County Administrator's Office and the Clerk to the Board's Office (Room 504) at the Chesterfield County Administration Building, Chesterfield, Virginia, for fublic examination between the hours 0 8:30 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. If further information is needed, please contact the County Attorney's Office at 748-1491 between the hours of 8:30 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. The hearing is held at a public facility designed to be accessible to persons with disabilities. Any persons with questions on the accessibility of the facility or need for reasonable accommodations should contact Lisa Elko, Clerk to the board, at 748-1200. Persons needinj: interpreter services for the deaf must notily the Clerk to the Board no later than Friday, August 17, 2007. Description Ad Size Cost (per issue) Firearms 1 col x 4.5" $114.40 The Observer, Inc. Publisher of CHESTERFIELD OBSERVER This is to certify that the attached legal notice was published by Chesterfield Observer in the county of Chesterfield, state of Virginia, on the following date(s): 8/08/2007 & 8/1512007 Sworn to and subscribed before me this J 5+h day of Augus+ ,2007. CjJ 2:Ja~ Legal Affiant Jo My commission expires: November 30,2010 Commission LD. 7040138 (SEAL) ,,\\\\'" 'UII." III ,,\\...~ L I", ~ '{" : ~ ~ ..... ..... G'. "J' fl ~,,'~CMW4"":~ ~~:~ <',.A'. ~ 'i...V.:o ~:; t ..;! . OF : = ~t. . :: , ... \.. 1/ \":t-./ j ".. .. \. ~ ...... 0)' ....... \ \'QV " , .t~RY l''-' ,,\\'" ~I""'ff "..tt'~' \' THIS IS NOT A BILL. PLEASE PAY FROM INVOICE. THANK YOU. ~t&1~J!'~~'1 ~ . -~. -- J ~, ~ ~!!\~ CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Meeting Date: August 22, 2007 Item Number: 16.F. Subiect: PUBLIC HEARING: Ordinance to Vacate a Sixteen-Foot Drainage Easement across Lot I, Block H, Mayfair Estates, Section B County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Q1 . I; Board Action Reaueste~:' Adopt an ordinance to vacate a 16' drainage easement across Lot I, Block H, Mayfair Estates, Section B, as shown on the attached plat. Summary of Information: Raymond Cecil Kovas, Sr. and Laura L. Kovas have requested the vacation of a 16' drainage easement across Lot 1, Block H, Mayfair Estates, Section B. This request has been reviewed by staff and approval is recommended. District: Dale Preparer: John W. Harmon Title: Riaht of Way Manaaer Attachments: . Yes DNO # 000379 ....: R: ~ ... ~ ;:~jj~ (:.II ~ ~ ~ ~, J:3 '1~~ .:;; ~ ~ .J! ~ ~I ~ 4j;....~~'. ::. . I' .j L ~ ill ;- to .... r 1:11'. ~~ ~.-..:I II ~")-~ I.. J. .. -..:.. -= .. _ ~ !Ii ~ .. I (L ...... · ~ g.1.. .r.... ... -.. rI4 · _ ...::...... ~ L ~ ......... '::I l' ,) - ~ ~ ~ ~Il ~:. ~a,~ I ~~~ ~ ~~ ~.. ..=-=..~~. ~~. 1 i~~~ ~ =-. -:t... "Ji!1'I: ..: ~ . :.." ""; ~ .1... h- -- ...... .. W!l' .... ~ ~ ~ ' ': ., , I~{~~I~~ .~ III ~ ....1 ...-- _ ...",..... 1::.._. ...::... _ 1:61... .... ...:---.... · _ ~:;:-;-~ ~ t!. ...., iI[..-;-. . "'I:: ... -:... r .. .. LJ -..... """I I h. ...... ..."\. I.... ~ ... · . "':1 . -. ~ =t. =.i,.: · ~... .. -1:. ' .... _ ...-_~ F",. I"';!.. I' .. -:-.. ~... ..... ..... n ''I" .Eo' _ _ _ :.:- r · -;.L-.- =:.. ..... _ _...... :--.:-&-" _......-: :. -:- 3" . · r: ......,....- _ · .. ~ - · .... .. .-- ---- ~ ~ _:1~ l I I I ~ ~~ II . ~ I" It: t~ ~~i-=:i ..\~ ~.. . · -:: ~, ~ ~ri Raymond C. Kovas, Sr. Laura L. Kovas 9807 Kendelwick Dr. DB'. 7821 PO. 651 PIN: 751683297000000 HOfF:: THIS PROPERTY IS LOCATED IN ZONe -'- AS SHOWN ON FEUA COMMUNITY PANEL NO. 510035 0052 B F"ALLING CREEK FARMS (EFFECTIVE DATEI MARCH 16, 1983) SECTION 'G. BLOCK .E- LOT 1 8' EASEMENT FOR DRAINAGE AND UTILITIES. ROD FDt 0.64' Nt" OF' CORNER ~ U t--fW ~>" -' ........ ~ W~o "~~~ Z W ~ L=39.27' R=25.00' T=25.00' ~...........---~..............----....---~---..~~~~ S 01-49'50" \J~ 135.00' ----,---~l I t 8' I I t 48,3' I >L,,~ I ... \ f) .". I'" ~ I.. 9 .,../ ~_(:. 0'" ,..,. ~ftt.Vv I q ~( ~~'\: ~~ If) - {,t ~ 'i..'(A.~ I C: ~ I ~ ~"'s I Z I I 1l I , I I I .-..aIIIIIII ............. -- ~,.-... ... o ci \0 LOT 1 LaJ 0.54 ACRES lIEMFF<S)=208.5 f ~ ~ CD ..... (I) TWO STORY FRAME 'WITH BASEME-blT 48.4' __ _ _ __ __ ~fAT~D~. _ 8" ----"-- - ------- .--. .---. -... --.. ...-. 8' - - _______ ..... ~ " ..... ~ ..... ...--- - b 16 ~ DR -;t';;;; ............. Lf) ~ EA ~ NAGE ('j ....... .--. ~ SEMENT CD , 110.00' N 01-49'50" E MAYFAIR ESTATES ~ DUNRA VEN ; ROAD (50' RI 'J) -DRAINAGE AND LOT GRADING PLANJ COUNTY 'PROJECT ND. 02-0346 <SEWER EXTENSION) 8' 8' JlROD FD. T--- l I I 8' I Y /'~ l.&J l::J1- <tz Zw ....-t;:E <(w O!"'" c::a4: ~w ...... r3 't f-" <C p:a · t-..~ V) "C\J w6~ O! ..... u""'" ~ t- CO <[ U -I.J LLWIXl )-(1) <C :J: PLA T SHOWING IMPROVEMENTS ON LOT 1, BLOCK uH", PLAN OF uMAYFAIR ESTATES", SECTION "Bu, JHE DALE DISTRICT OF CHESTERFIELD COUNTY, VIRGINIA. NDTEi THIS SURVEY IS tOR ONSTRUCTIDN LOAN PURPOSES NL Y. NDTEt ALL IMPROVEMENTS NOT SHOWN AT THIS TIME. a<<afID: ACK TIll. fs to certIfy that on MARCH 1... 2007 r mode an occurote Field Survey of the premises ItIoWn hereon: thot aU ;mprovtmentl and "..menta known or viIIible ore shown her.",: that ttt... are no encroachments by Im~t. .Ither from adJoInfn9 pntm.... or 'rom lubject premi.. upon adjoining pre mi..,. other thon - shown helWOrI.. PorrB, JIlN'tBB IUId ASSOClA'l'BS. P.C. ~ Ltmd SurnT0Z'8. LalJd PJIIlUl.,.., 38BO Courtl1oue Roed 1 RlclJmond. VJ.rz1DIa B8B3tJ (804) 7'a-BB7B Dot.~ 3-1-07 Sca~: 1 '=30' J.N. 0212-04 000381. Ch,estel1i,eld Observer' . - . '-~ . . ....,..- ._.,.~. ';1'";.1: _",>>-, '.'. ._,~'" Your CII"'mZm;t..... Nt'u',\papcr Since 11J95 P.O. R", 1616. Midlothi"n. Virginia 2.111:1. Phon~: (X().J1545-751J(). Fax: (XII4) 7.14-.n6~. Email: n\'ws@ch<,t<rliddoh,,"TV<r.com.lnlcl11ct: wwW.chc'lcrlicldob,"rvcr,\'<lm Client Chesterfield County Right Of Way 'fAKE NOTICE lhal on August 22. 2007. al 6:30 p.m. or as SOon thereafter as may be heard. the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County at its regular meeting place In the Public Meeting Room of Chesterfield County. Virginia. will consider the (ollowing ordinance (or adoption: AN ORDINANCE to vacate a 16' drainage easement ."TOSS Lot I. Block H. Mayfa:!r Estales Subdivision. Section B. as shown on a plat by Fosler & Miller. dated May 10. 1972. recorded May 22. 1972. in the Clerk', Office. Circult Court. Chesterfield County. Virginia. In Plat Book 19, at Page 19. The complete text ofth. proposed ordinance i, on file in the office of the Right of Way Manager 10 Chesterfield County. Virginia. and may be examined by all interested parties between the hours of 8:30 a.m. and 5:00 p.m.. Monday through Friday. ADVERTISING AFFIDAVIT Description Ad Size Cost (per issue) Mayfair Estates 1 col x 2.5" $100.00 The Observer, Inc. Publisher of CHESTERFIELD OBSERVER This is to certify that the attached legal notice was published by Chesterfield Observer in the county of Chesterfield, state of Virginia. on the following date(s): 8/08/2007 & 8/15/2007 Sworn to and subscribed before me this 15+h day of A~+ ,2007. ad ;{ :2/ki;) Legal Affiant My commission expires: November 30, 2010 Commission J.D. 7040138 (SEAL) \\\'\''''11'""" \,\\'\ ~ L f", ,~,~ ,\.... . ( " ,.~ ~\\- ......... ". ", 'l ~. .... ON l'{f. ....1.1".(> \. I:: Q .'~\...~ "('. 0" 'i":l:~' ..A'.: ltt~' io OF ~: ~ ~ ,.. . .. ~.,.\ I '''L''' .. ~ ~.: \~.. ". '/ \\\ .... r .... . ~ (,')- ......... '0" .,' "'" ./lily pI.) ...... ."",.,,"..,,'0'.' THIS IS NOT A BILL. PLEASE PAY FROM INVOICE. THANK YOU. liiitB -~ . _. . J IJ CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Meeting Date: August 22, 2007 Item Number: 16.G. Subiect: PUBLIC HEARING: Consider the Exercise of Eminent Domain for the Acquisition of a Parcel of Land Along Meadowville Road and Bermuda Hundred Road from Mercer P. Faw County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Q~ Board Action Reauest~ Authorize the County Attorney to proceed with eminent domain for the acquisition of a parcel of land along Meadowville Road and Bermuda Hundred Road (portion of PIN: 817654276000000) and authorization to enter and take such property prior to eminent domain proceedings. Summary of Information: On July 31, 2007, an offer of $1,021.201 which includes $0.00 in damages, was made to Mercer P. Faw for a portion of PIN: 817654276000000. The offer to purchase this property has not been accepted, no counteroffer has been made and County staff. and the owner cannot agree on the compensation to be paid or other terms of the purchase. This parcel of land was set aside by Woodvale Investment Corporation as additional road right of way along Meadowville Road and Bermuda Hundred Road in 1965 but was never dedicated. It contains approximately 0.78 acresl is approximately 2700' long, varies in width and lies between the public roads and fourteen homes. There are seventeen properties in violation of the zoning ordinance because they have no public road frontage and one owner whose building permit application cannot be approved without this acquisition. Therefore, it is necessary to proceed with the use of eminent domain for the benefit of these landowners and the public. Staff will continue to negotiate with the owner in an effort to reach an agreement. District: Bermuda Preparer: John W. Harmon Title: Rieht of Way Manaaer Attachments: . Yes DNa # 000382 ~I'il ..~ ~... ..~~. r .. . ... I ..:.~..... T ... · ..::I ....... ....... III. -: ................. · --=' L~ ...... IIII' _...Jj......-r :-- I ~ ~ '" , ' .. ...-.-...... .r 'L ~ ~ jjI; :&...r:"" . ~: ~~ r ~~~~~'. ~ ~ --::-....: iIi rt: · · · . 'tI.... .~ ..-: ;:.:-" I ~ -=. ~ ~ ~~ - '; -",~ n'~~ ~1It~ ~ f'; I .~ t'J-:":"T Mi ~ ~ ~.., L.: WLI :Ii · ~;~" tl ;~ ~ i 1_:- J "II · '7 :E :"I ....- ..... ..... . I . . . ~ ~ ..~ .~ Iii ' " I ~ IJ ~ t~ ~~ I ~ ~ ~I · I -=-L .1 I ~... ~ I~I .... ... III ~ ~ , ~ , !!:I ~ I 5 !, 'I' PI.-ear r I I :./ l 1 ti .: ~-~ i:JI ~ ~~ ~ ~ I . , t~~~ Ii -:s.i . ;:--Ir:iJ:I iI-:--." i-:~::. '!.I..... · ... ~:.... ~ nr: .: ~. E ~1 ~r ~ .-~:M -:::.... · ~..: F .:!"!:!. :II ....-.;u . ~ 11::--.: ..ilIfII. .: . · I · ~..:. i 1I::11.:JII ~ - ...- ~ It _ ... :.IJIlI~," ... .. . ..~.... I!:: ....: ~ I - II f-! III ... :-r .. · I ~ I ~; ., ::.... ~ =l' · ~ II ~- ... .i.Z:. -:-- I.. ..... r-~. ~ ~...: i" · ~ :r ""Ii--= .. -::- . J:" · rIJ.I. .....::11 ~ -. I ~ I .. ~,I ~ "'1=1'" ',-, r. I!i:: ::' Jo' , . ~ f.: ~ - '=' 11;1 ~ ..."..zi ~...:- I . .JI.tiI, '.-;.' , of. .",. - ... ~ .. . , ., .;II II' , , ~ ~ 112 ~ "LE......"., ~ 'I ~~ ..~/ ~' :J' ~ -. no.... , - ,.... , r:JI. ~ Lr:: ~ ~ >~I~~ J~, ,w.i~:r _~;~ ~ ,~l;i-x ~~ ~ · ~ ..~~ · : If'... fl! ~\~""i.i~ ~ :-l":: Pi: - ';-i - &:'~ ~ ... '~~.; ,... ~ ~ ~. ..; art;. ~ rM ~I' ,} :-- II7f ..~ II ~ ~ I. ~.. "!Ii ,... ~L~, ~. r ~~? ~:... -~~ ~~-:... I ij:$'. .~" ... . ... - - !.5 p r. :} ~"fI!J.IJ I~:;':j ... ... .:;..., · _ .~_""1.1i:li.. ... . ".-:i:r."~,;il~."'" ..~ .r;(-~ ..~ ~ ,. ' =::: ':J.. ..~~ ~ i~l~ "!"'r ~.. II. I ~ .. r , ~.:.:- \:".:~ /:....... · ~:-:E.. ~~_. ~... ....-:rr".. : ..... ... j __ r ~ I' ~ -:-. ~..'--"~ .-1. II ~~.~ I~ ~ ~~:,~lJ b1~) ,..}~~?;(..~.~i~~, ~;.~ ~~3tSi:~~,~'~~2~1 ~~:::.-: :1"'":1 1.1 ..... -- ~............. ~:..:.... J!....- ...... ~ 1~.d""~~[Y. · .....:- . .....~ · ~::..' ~. ~:" ......;i.. f 'tl..:-tP.......... ~ -:-. .-.--...... .-:--~. I ... :~' ,"'..., ?!if'" '" 'l:~. r T ....p.,... · ... ___ r-:....I .. ."). I I .... .. ...... · I" ...-.: ~ .. · -::. .. I. I · I "': · I ... . -:"11 a.:-. . · · . · ... .. . ... I L' ~ ~ ,..,:. .....: ~ ~ " ,,~ yi"- "~~ -,' ~ ~ ' ,..~ '...;;.....~ ~ ~' ',~ ;-' .- ~!,.... , i.- ~ ~ 9 ,r..: :-1. J.. ',:.' ~: ~~I~'C ...: .. .Y - · .1. ....~.{ ....~.... -.....: . · . I....~.~. ..\: 1- ...'...... .~!. ...:.d...........: I _....... ...:.". ~ .. ~.:;-f .. :=-.. 1.:- ~ 7 r · --=---- ..... · .. -,"".. .:"111. .~. .. ~ ~... · .. .. · ........ ~ .. .. ~..:.. .. · . . · .. 1:-... .. : · .;.:..: ..... ~:.~.......:I. .. ~I ~ r:i y~ ...'~. .'01. ..., ...:.,,;.-t.:.. .. ~.?t.. r:) -) ::~=-; ...: =~.=- .:..:. ~.: ~: · "'" ~ ~ r-:.:..:. . ~........ .,:.. .:): I" r ~ =- ...:1-.. ~ .... ,.. ........:- .... rr ...:.: r.... .. . I ~. . u ~.. .... · R:...i' ~ 'II ~. ~...... 1If'.,.... J, .... i. · .. .. -: .: .. ) L --=:"1: ' · ~ .. iI. I. · .. -- .. I .. r · .. · ... :.... .:- tt'"".. I. ...'..... ...... .. ., .... · . :. . ."!\r. :.. ~ :- -= .. : ~ : ' . : r .. .:.:..... . :.r' · ..~.. · I ". ...... ~ ...;". ~ \ ~ ..,.; .. ...--:;. r,...". ~ .:. .,.. :... .. ..: ~ :: ..~. .I .: ,: .::.: · · ... ... : . ". .... :."... -=- --. '~~1 ~~~:~~~. I ~. =.- .. ~.)r.- ,--:~ .. .... I -.:r:. ... iI...~':'. ~.~ . ..::: , -:...:]11:'""... . ~. . . -:.~. .r ~ - ,~,tt '1-r -: ~.':t. :.-;.". . .... ... .. :. .\. . :. : .:.i.\:. :.:. .;'1: r ...... I . ......... I.... .. .. ~............ : .1. Ches.lerfield Observer Your COIfllmmily NelopllJ'c'r Sinn' 1995 ().o. Rox 1616, Midl(lthian. Vir~jllia 2.'\llJ.. Ph(Irk:: (XO-l) 545-7500. Fax: (So.n 7-W-.r!6<J. Email: ncwS@cht.'sh..rtieldohsc-n'a.cof1l -Int\.'mct: WWW.dll.:~I~l'liddtlhscn:erxlllII ADVERTISING AFFIDAVIT Client Description Ad Size Cost (per issue) Chesterfield County Right Of Way Eminent Domain I col x 2" $90.00 The Observer, Inc. Publisher of CHESTERFIELD OBSERVER This is to certify that the attached legal notice was published by Chesterfield Observer in the county of Chesterfield, state of Virginia, on the following date(s): 8/15/2007 TAKE NOTICE That on Augusl 22, 2007, at 6:30 p.m. Or as soon thereafter as may be heard, the Board of Suyenisors of Che,'terfieJd County al its reguJilr meeting place in the Public Meeting Room ofChestertield County. Virgin~" will consider the exercise of eminent domain fur the acquisition of a portion of PIN: 81765427600000o, Sworn to and subscribed before me this ~ 5 +h day of Info~m~tion regarding Ihe proposed acqUlSll10n is on file in the office of the Right of Way Manager in Cheslerfield County, Virginia. and may be examined by all Interested panies betWeen the hours of 8:30 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday. A~us+- ,2007. t:J ./,:2fbt; Legal Affiant Joann My commission expires: November 30, 20 I 0 Commission I.D. 7040138 (SEAL) ,'\'\\"'~"'L~""""'",. ", "",\ ........ (.~. ". ~'i' .., "W '. 1.'...0' $ ~,",~C" f'4'" 0..... iQ...~. ().\. ; f-~.o ~.- : : <> of : '.:: /.~ . ~ 1 ~ i \ '\ .....J'IR \lI.':'/(J i/ ." (1,. ....... to --.' ~I"" .,., Ry ~~ ,...",...,-' " ~"#""'t..t"'\'~~:'" THIS IS NOT A BILL. PLEASE PAY FROM INVOICE. THANK YOU. .------..,' ~ 1 ~ _. - I ~ - -~ "!t!!iJ,t}Jl'~ CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Meeting Date: August 22,2007 Item Number: 16.H. Subiect: PUBLIC HEARING: Consider Leasing Space on the County's Bon Air Tower County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: # Board Action Reauested: Approve the leasing of space on the County's Bon Air Tower to TTM Virginia! Inc. Summary of Information: Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors approve the leasing of space on the County's Bon Air Tower. The lease term is for five years at $24,000 per year with three 5 year renewal terms with 15% rent increases. Since the tower is located on State property, half of the rent will be paid to the Department of Juvenile Justice. District: Midlothian Preparer: John W. Harmon Title: RiQht of Way Manager Attachments: DYes .NO # 000384 Cbeslll1ield: Observer You,. Community NCIr.'if1t.lpa Sillcr! /995 P.O. Hox. 16th. Midluthian. Virginia 2.111.' . Phon\.': (~(I.t) 545-7500. Fa\(: (NO..n 7..J4-.l169' Email: ncw<~chc...tcrtid(h)hscr\.(.r.com . Inll'nU:I: WW\\',(:hestedh..ldol't:o-C'rvl:r.l'ut11 Client Chesterfield County Right Of Way TAKE NOTICE 1hal on AUl\ust 22. 2007, al 6:30 p.m. or as ooon the~afi.r as may b. heard, the Board of Sup.moors O{Ch.sl.rfield Counl)" allls r.gular m.eting plae. in the PubUc M.eting RoomofChest.rlieldCOUIlIy, Virginia wjJJ consid.r th.l.aslng of spac. on 11$ Bo~ Alr Tower a11900 Chatsworth Av.nue. InformaUon regarding the proposed I.... is On tile in the offic. of the RJght of Way Manag.r ill Chest.rlidd County. Virginia, and. may be exarnmed by all intere..ted pan,.s between Ihe hours of 8:30 a.m. and 5;00 p.m.. Monday through Friday. ADVERTISING AFFIDA VIT Description Ad Size Cost (per issue) Bon Air Tower 1 co!. x ] .5" $67.50 The Observer, Inc. Publisher of CHESTERFIELD OBSERVER This is to certify that the attached lega] notice was published by Chesterfield Observer in the county of Chesterfield, state of Virginia, on the following date(s): 8/15/2007 Sworn to and subscribed before me this /5-#1 day of Acsus+- ,2007. r;./o1dkt Legal Affiant J My commission expires: November 30, 20] 0 Commission I.D. 7040138 (SEAL) \,""""'"h. "",\ L "'/~~ "" ~\~ ....:. (~,:'" .;f v:.....bIU./t>.. JCI '-::, Igo~~'_~\;; 4(.\.~o~ ~"';)fCi :t1'~' = . . C OF . , ::\ ~, \ .: ~I ~. .... b \'\." {J f/ THIS IS NOT A BILL. PLEASE PAY FROM INVOICE. THANK YOU. 6=~ . 'I -~ CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Meeting Date: August 22, 2007 Item Number: 19. Subiect: Adjournment and Notice of Next Scheduled Meeting of the Board of Supervisors County Administrator's Comm,ents: County Administrator: g- Board Action Reauested: Summary of Information: Motion of adjournment and notice of the Board of Supervisors meeting to be held on September 26, 2007 at 3:00 p.m. in the Public Meeting Room. Preparer: Lisa Elko Title: Clerk to the Board Attachments: DYes .NO I # 0003851